20072133 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring and As Built Report_20120109

D - z133
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Report
Final
Glade Creek
Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project Number: 854
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Submitted to
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 2011
-#.-
E 1a fi e ht
"'OGRAM AIV 9 _
H Y 2012
1652 Mail Service Center NC��
Raleigh, NC 27699 NHANCE�EjSE STEM
J

Monitoring Firm
5 A �•'
, E UIN
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828- 253 -6856
Project Contact: Win Taylor
Email: wingequinoxenvironmental.com

Table of Contents
Page
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................ ............................... 1
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .............................................................. ............................... 2
2.1 Location and Setting ....................................................................... ............................... 2
2.2 Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................... ............................... 4
2.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ................... ............................... 4
2.4 Project History, Contacts, and Attribute Data ............................. ............................... 7
3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA ...................................................................... ............................... 10
3.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability ..................... ............................... 10
3.1.1 Dimension ............................................................................... ............................... 10
3.1.2 Pattern and Profile ................................................................. ............................... 11
3.1.3 Substrate ................................................................................... .............................I1
3.2 Hydrology ......................................................................................... .............................11
3.3 Vegetation ...................................................................................... ............................... 11
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN ........................... .............................12
5.0 PROJECT MONITORING AND AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ..... ............................... 12
5.1 Feature Monitoring Details .......................................................... ............................... 12
5.1.1 Stream ..................................................................................... ............................... 12
5.1.2 Hydrology ............................................................................... ............................... 12
5.1.3 Vegetation ............................................................................... ............................... 12
5.1.4 Permanent Photo Locations .................................................. ............................... 13
5.1.5 Visual Assessment .................................................................. ............................... 13
5.2 As -Built Conditions ....................................................................... ............................... 13
5.2.1 Streams ...................................................................................... .............................13
5.2.2 Vegetation ................................................................................. .............................13
5.2.3 Permanent Photo Stations ....................................................... .............................14
6.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................... .............................22
Appendix A. Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B. As -Built Plan View
Appendix C. Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Appendix D. Longitudinal Profile Plots
Appendix E. Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix F. Permanent Photo Station Photos

Figures
Page
Figure 1. Vicinity Map 3
Figure 2. Project Components and Assets Map 6
Tables
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
5
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
7
Table 3.
Project Contacts
8
Table 4.
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
9
Table 5.
Baseline Stream Data Summary
15
Table 6.
Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
17
Table 7.
Vegetation Plot Attribute Data
19
Table 8.
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
20
Table 9.
Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
21
M

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project includes portions of Glade Creek and an Unnamed Tributary (UT) and involved the
restoration and preservation of 3,562 linear feet of stream and 0.26 acre of wetlands. The goals
of the project included channel stabilization and preservation, channel feature and aquatic habitat
restoration and rehabilitation, riparian buffer rehabilitation, and existing wetland preservation.
Project objectives to accomplish the goals involved constructing a channel with an appropriate
pattern, longitudinal profile, and cross - sectional dimension for the impaired stream and re-
establishing a continuous wooded riparian buffer along stream banks. Additionally, structures
were installed to enhance the aquatic habitat within the restored reaches.
For monitoring purposes the project site was delineated into three primary stream reaches that
include Glade Creek, Unnamed Tributary Lower (UT- Lower), and Unnamed Tributary Upper
(UT- Upper). A total of 2,558 linear feet of restoration were implemented on Glade Creek. The
UT -Lower reach included 265 linear feet of restoration and the UT -Upper reach included 784
linear feet of stream preservation.
The primary focus of the revegetation element of the project was to restore natural plant
communities within the riparian corridor. Planting plans for the two planting zones were
implemented to reflect both the Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest (Shafale and Weakley 1990)
and the species already present on site. Additionally, invasive species control was implemented
during construction to minimize the impacts of multiflora rose Rosa multiflora on the restored
plant communities.
Two separate wetland areas were identified within the project site, which included one along
Glade Creek and one along LIT 1- Upper. These wetlands most closely resemble the High
Elevation Seep community (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). All wetlands within the project
boundary were considered functional and were preserved through inclusion within the
conservation easement boundary.
Annual monitoring will begin in 2011 and will include stream and vegetation monitoring
components as established within this document. Annual monitoring will occur for five years or
until project success criteria have been achieved.
Glade Creek Final I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Location and Setting
The Glade Creek Restoration Site is on a parcel owned by Stephen W. Faw (Figure 1). It is
situated within the Little River watershed (14 -digit HUC - 05050001030020) of the New River
basin cataloging unit (8 -digit HUC — 05050001). The Little River watershed was identified by
the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) as a Targeted Local Watershed
with significant stream and wetland restoration needs (NCEEP 2009).
The Glade Creek stream and wetland project is part of the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Little River and Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP).
The Little River and Brush Creek Watersheds (HUCs 05050001030020 and 05050001030030,
respectively) were selected for the LWP study due to the presence of High Quality Waters
(HQW) and abundant opportunities to conserve water quality by restoring riparian habitat on
unforested stream buffers. The watersheds also contain rare bog habitat and significant trout
populations.
The LWP assessment uncovered the following functional stressors within the study area:
• Unforested buffers;
• Livestock access to streams;
• Severe erosion on stream banks;
• Land - disturbing activities on steep slopes; and
• Non -point source pollution from the Town of Sparta and surrounding areas.
Detailed stream and wetland assessments for the Little River and Brush Creek LWP identified a
variety of mitigation opportunities throughout the study area that would benefit the aquatic
resources of the watersheds. Stream and buffer restoration and enhancement in particular offer
opportunities to remediate serious stressors to the watershed functions of habitat, hydrology, and
water quality. The Glade Creek project was designed and implemented to specifically address
LWP goals and watershed -level stressors including inadequate riparian buffers and
sedimentation. In addition the project was aimed at restoring aquatic habitat functions in trout
waters.
The site is located in Alleghany County, North Carolina approximately 4 miles south of Sparta.
Prior to project implementation, Glade Creek and the downstream portion of the Unnamed
Tributary channel were unstable, exhibiting mid - channel sediment bars, incised beds, and steep,
eroding, unvegetated banks throughout. The upper portion of the Unnamed Tributary and the
small, existing wetlands within the project extent are fully functional and will be preserved
within the conservation easement boundary.
Glade Creek Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program C and is
en
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
;� --�~ < �` ' :`^ ��\ _� •�� '- - , tt ` - - bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site
( •• •: � =�-�'� ld �- �' % � �J may require Traversing areas near or along the easement
(�,J - j18 �l _�. �•� -',�- �_,'�` L _ boundary and therefor access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal
�"' .�� l' (r ,.'�, -, �� _-� \` �� \� �t h ,� ' • '" agencies or their designeestcontractors involved in the
development, oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is
permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles.
Any intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of
these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior
coordination - -F� 'th NC EEP
AN
21
- `-Ly\.
21 ao
v/
" \ 1 `� ' �1' �• i � rl 1, � V �'..5�,- �<Jl
4 ;err Glade Creek �f
L +, _ ��� � , �7 ', �" Stream Restoration Site -AU
,-
fs `iEtle
Cm y
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Made crew C- r
�rY Stream Restoration Sire �W
/ - -- - 1 - - - -'--
,, Glade Creek 1N1 E Er+'�aaste nt
111ap�s
Stream Restoration Site " " - - - "•` PROGRAM
'act -cawr F- -,MC —W N
Directions: The project site is located in Allegheny County, Project No. 854 0 1,500 3,000 6,000
North Carolina, approximately 4 miles southeast of the town of Feet
Sparta. From the south and east, the site can be accessed by
exiling Interstate 77 North at the US 21 Bypass exit in Elkin.
Proceed on US 21 towards Sparta for 23.1 miles to Dewitt Alleghany County, North Carolina 7.5 Minute Series
Road. Turn left on Dewitt Road and travel 0.7 miles to the site Glade Valley Quadrangle
entrance on the left at 541 Dewitt Road.

2.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives stated in the Glade Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2007) are as
follows:
Project Goals:
• Rapidly stabilize the channel of Glade Creek relative to natural processes;
• Rapidly stabilize and preserve the channel of the Unnamed Tributary relative to natural
process;
• .Restore and rehabilitate channel features and aquatic habitat in Glade Creek and the
Unnamed Tributary;
• Rehabilitate the riparian buffer along both streams; and
• Preserve the existing wetlands onsite.
Project Objectives:
• Restore approximately 2,430 linear feet of stream channel on Glade Creek;
• Restore approximately 275 linear feet of the Unnamed Tributary;
• Preserve 570 linear feet of the Unnamed Tributary; and
• Preserve the existing 0.33 acre wetlands within the project site.
2.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Prior to project implementation, Glade Creek and the downstream portion of the Unnamed
Tributary channel were unstable, exhibiting mid - channel sediment bars, incised beds, and steep,
eroding, unvegetated banks throughout. Approximately 62% of the Glade Creek channel within
the project boundary had a Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) rating of High, 33% had a rating
of Very High, and 5% had a rating of Moderate (Rosgen 2001). The estimated total sediment
export per year for the Glade Creek reach was 619 tons, based on the Rosgen (200 1) sediment
export curves. The UT -Lower reach had a BEHI rating of Very High, and the estimated total
sediment export per year for the reach was estimated at 72 tons. Additionally, approximately
70% of the channel along Glade Creek had bank height ratios (BHR) of 2 or more and all of UT-
Lower reach had a BHR of >2.
Work on Glade Creek and UT -Lower involved restoring a total of 2,823 linear feet of C stream
type utilizing a Priority Level 2 approach (Rosgen 1997). This approach was used to restore the
unstable channel geometry, sinuosity, and steep stream banks. In order to provide stabilization
to the newly graded channel, especially along the outside of meander bends, in- stream structures
including log vanes, root wads, and large woody debris bundles were utilized. Rock structures
such as cross vanes and steps were incorporated into the restored reaches to provide grade
control. The floodplain bench and upland planting zones were targeted for revegetation to
establish native plant communities.
The project also included the preservation of 784 linear feet of stream within the UT- Upstream
reach. Additionally, the two fully functional wetlands identified within the project site were
preserved through a permanent conservation easement. The project components and summations
are reported in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2.
Glade Creek Final 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

U .~
rte-. O
. N
y C
N G
Q U
c U
� Q
c
0
m
c
ti
c
0
U
c
E
C
O
c
w
x
0
c
o-
W
by
c
� O
00
0o c
0
o �
z„
U •�
.0 N
o �
a �
O
�
ti
0 w
CC
O
O
U
4z
o
v
p
ti
o
Gw
o
z
O O
icd- Q'
M
Vl
00
r
V
�
N
00
tZ
N
p
7
z ❑
;, �
N
co �
a•
0
4' c
z
O
w
b
O
c o
g
g
9
s
3
U
C
O
O
u
D
O
0
0
0
a
4
o
�
z
o
o
�
j
'C
ir"
r
7
N
N
p\
A
Z
o
z
z°
W
°^
c
u •C
a
°
in
O
0o
N
r
O
i0
CC
cC
O
�p
�
N
U
O
O
o0
O
C
0
�
o
b
C
o
o
W
o
c
o
*
00
°-
+
c
o
op
z
b
r
�
�
N
�
G
O
O
�
c
v
F
F
❑
c
o
Y
aci
a°i
a°i
v
�
O
O
y �
•Q
ca
�
R%
�
cd
cd
U
�
c
E=F°-
4rzc���3
rx
rxwwwc�a
x
wz
U .~
rte-. O
. N
y C
N G
Q U
c U
� Q
c
0
m
c
ti
c
0
U
c
E
C
O
c
w
x
0
c
o-
W
by
c
� O
00
0o c
0
o �
z„
U •�
.0 N
o �
a �

N
t, AN 'jam'_` ,
. r1f,
Y.
1` Mm

2.4 Project History, Contacts, and Attribute Data
The NCEEP contracted Biohabitats Southeast Bioregion Inc. (Biohabitats) to provide design and
construction management services. The Restoration Plan was completed by Biohabitats in
December 2007 ( NCEEP 2007) and construction was initiated in September 2010. Project
construction and planting were completed in Apri12011 and baseline monitoring efforts were
initiated.
The project activity and reporting history are detailed in Table 2. Project personnel and contact
information for the design and monitoring components is presented in Table 3. Table 4 presents
background project attribute information for the site.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Glade Creek / Project No. 854
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Miti ation Plan
June 2007
Dec 2007
Final Desi - Construction Plans
Aug 2007
Dec 2008
Construction
N/A
Aril 2011
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
Sept - Nov 2010
March -Aril 2011
Permanent seed mix applied
N/A
Sept - Nov 2010
March -Aril 2011
Planting
MaY 2011
May 2011
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline
May 2011
Dec 2011
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
N/A - Item does not apply.
Glade Creek Final 7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 3. Project Contacts
Glade Creek / Project No. 854
Designer
Biohabitats Southeast Bioregion Inc.
8218 Creedmoor Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
Primary Project Design POC
Kevin Nunnery (919) 518 -0313
Construction Contractor
Yadkin Valley Construction
2961 Old 60 Highway
Ronda, North Carolina 28670
Construction Contractor POC
Terry Benton (336) 984 -2219
Planting Contractor
Foggy Mountain Nursery
2251 Ed Little Road
Creston, North Carolina 28615
Planting Contractor POC
Glen Sullivan (336) 384 -5323
Seeding Contractor
Yadkin Valley Construction
2961 Old 60 Highway
Ronda, North Carolina 28670
Seeding Contractor POC
Terry Benton (336) 984 -2219
Seed Mix Sources
Hanes Geo
(336) 747 -1600
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Glen Sullivan (336) 384 -5323
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y1) - 2011
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2012
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y3)- 2013
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y4)- 2014
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Monitoring Performers (Y5)- 2015
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation M onitormg POC
Glade Creek Final 8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Glade Creek / Project No. 854.
Project Information
Project Name
Glade Creek
County
Alle han
Project Area (acres)
15.86
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
Latitude 36.468090 / Longitude -81066384
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
New River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -d it
05050001
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -d it
05050001000801
NCDW Sub -Basin
05 -07 -03
Project Drainage Area (acres)
3,443
Project Drainage Area Percentage of In-pervious Cover
<l%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Deciduous Forest Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Glade Creek
UT -Lower
UT -Upper
Length of Reach (linear feet)
2,558
265
784
Valley Classification
-
-
-
Drainage Area (acres)
2,922
521
520
NCDWQ Stream Identification Score
59
50.5
50.5
NCDWQ WaterQuality Classification
C -Tr
GTr
GTr
Morphological Description (stream type)
C
C
Evolutionary Trend
Underlying Mapped Soils
Alluvial
Alluvial
Alluvial
Drainage Class
Soil H dric Status
-
-
-
Slope
0.0075
0.0075
0.0075
FEMA Classification
-
Native Ve etatation Community
Northern Hardwood Forest & Rich Cove Forest
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
145%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1 (Glade Ck)
Wetland 2 (UI)
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.178
0.085
Wetland Type
Riparian
Riparian
Soil Series
Toxawa
Soil H dric Status
Hy dric
Source ofHydrology
Hydrologic I airment
Native Ve etatation Community
High Elevation See
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
0.00/0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
N/A
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
N/A
Endangered Species
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Flood lain Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Glade Creek Final 9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
3.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability
Considering the typical 5 -year timeframe for mitigation monitoring, the determination of success
for stream projects is often based primarily on the degree of morphological stability. The
complete absence of any change over these timeframes will certainly be interpreted as stability,
but is not a pre - requisite. To the contrary, it is typical for streams to demonstrate variation over a
5 -year monitoring period in the form of sustainable rates of change or stable patterns of variation
(dynamic stability). Considering the young state of woody buffers and the fact that design
parameters are estimates and therefore never a perfect match for the watershed regimes, restored
streams typically adjust or shift to some extent after their exposure to varying flows in the years
that immediately following construction. However, these changes should be moderate and
exhibit little discernable trends. Annual morphological variation is to be expected, but over time
and with buffer development should generally demonstrate a reduction in amplitude and
demonstrate dynamic maintenance around some central tendency that represents acceptable
distributions for design parameters and/or stable stream types. Key among these are parameters
that indicate lateral and vertical stability and intended levels of floodplain connection. If trends
or patterns become evident, they should be modest or indicate migration toward another stable
channel form. Lastly, all of this must be evaluated in the context of hydrologic events to which
the system is exposed over the monitoring period.
3.1.1 Dimension
Dimensional stability of the channel will be based on comparisons of overlays of annual cross -
section plots and their calculated parameters to the as -built conditions, design distributions, and
distributions for stable stream types. Parameters such as cross - sectional area and the channel's
width to depth ratio should demonstrate modest overall change and patterns of variation that are
in keeping with the previous description of dynamic stability. The stream dimensions should not
demonstrate trends of enlargement either through downcutting or widening, however, modest
year -to -year variation or oscillation in channel elevation or width demonstrating maintenance
around baseline or design distributions is acceptable. Changes from depositional processes
resulting in the development of constructive features on the banks and floodplain, such as an
inner berm, channel narrowing, natural levees, and general floodplain deposition will be
acceptable forms of change and indicative of stability.
The entire project will also be visually cataloged for areas of bank instability and presented as
proportions of overall bank footage. The overall proportion, severity, spatial distribution, and
temporal trends in this parameter will be assessed to serve as an additional indicator of
dimensional stability. In general, stability proportions (stable bank/total bank) below 85% would
be of concern. Considering temporal trends, a higher percentage in a given year may also be of
concern if it represents a data point in a trend of decreasing stability. Bank instability dominated
by surface scour versus mass wasting would be an example of differing severity and the latter
would be more concerning than the former. Erosion in meanders versus riffle reaches would
generate differing levels of concern because erosion in the former is more likely given greater
Glade Creek Final 10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

bank shear stress, whereas instability concentrated in riffle /run reaches might be more indicative
of an overall design flaw.
3.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Reach profiles should not exhibit any consistent trends in thalweg degradation over any
significant continuous portion of its length. Some aggradation will be acceptable and will not be
actionable unless it is apparently causal for widening/bank erosion. Over the monitoring period,
the profile should also demonstrate the maintenance or development of bedform (facets) in
keeping with reference level diversity and distributions for the subject stream type. It should
also provide a meaningful contrast in terms of bedform diversity against the pre- existing
condition. Bedform distributions, riffle /pool lengths, and slopes will vary, but should do so with
maintenance around design/as -built size distributions. This requires that the majority of pools
are maintained at greater depths with lower water surface slopes and riffles are shallower with
greater water surface slopes.
3.1.3 Substrate
Pebble count data should indicate the progression towards or the maintenance of the known
particle size distributions from the design phase. The absence of any significant trends in bed
aggradation or deposition should represent stable conditions in terms of sediment input and
transport functionality.
While stream projects are designed to transport bedload in equilibrium and carry overall
sediment loads at bankfull, fines can be transported even at low discharges. Channel instability
upstream of the project can also lead to sediment deposition in the restored project reach as storm
events recede. This can have the effect of obscuring bedform and fining of riffles especially in
the first few years after the implementation of a stream project. In many cases subsequent
narrowing and reduction of width /depth ratios as a project develops /stabilizes can then increase
transport efficiency and return bedform to intended distributions, but some fining can persist due
to upstream disturbance.
3.2 Hydrology
A minimum of two bankfull events must occur within separate years during the five -year
monitoring period.
3.3 Vegetation
The success of the riparian and wetland vegetation plantings will be determined by planted stem
densities within established monitoring plots. Survival of planted woody species must meet a
minimum survival success criterion of 320 planted stems per acre through year three and 260
stems per acre after year five. (USACE 2003)
Glade Creek Final I I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
During annual monitoring efforts any potential constraints to project success criteria will be
documented and reported. Maintenance recommendations will be based on the severity of the
problem and in consultation with NCEEP. In the event that maintenance activities are deemed
necessary, corrective measures will be documented within the annual reports.
5.0 PROJECT MONITORING AND AS -BUILT CONDITIONS
5.1 Feature Monitoring Details
Features established for baseline data collection and future annual monitoring purposes included
stream cross - sectional and longitudinal profiles, substrate assessment sites, stream hydrological
monitoring stations, vegetation monitoring plots, and photographic monitoring stations
(Appendix A — Monitoring Plan View).
5.1.1 Stream
Eight permanent cross - sections were established throughout the project site. Cross - sections
transecting four riffles and two pools were established on the Glade Creek reach. Cross - sections
for the Unnamed Tributary consisted of two riffles. Cross - section locations were marked on
both banks with rebar and PVC conduit with fluorescent pink flagging tape. Cross - section data
will be collected annually to document changes in dimensions such as area, width to depth ratios,
and entrenchment ratios.
Longitudinal profile monitoring reaches were established for the majority of the restoration
reaches and included a total of 2,811 linear feet. The Glade Creek profile reach included a total
of 2,548 linear feet while the Unnamed Tributary reach included a total of 263 linear feet. The
beginning and ending locations of the longitudinal profile reaches were marked on both banks
with rebar and PVC conduit with blue flagging tape. Annual measurements will be compared
with as -built conditions to document trends in the stream profile occurring throughout the
monitoring period. A total station will be used to collect annual cross - sectional and longitudinal
profile data. Visual monitoring will be conducted for all additional stream segments.
Bed material composition will be documented through annual pebble counts at each of the eight
cross - section locations. Annual pebble counts will be collected utilizing methods adapted from
Harrelson et al. (1994).
5.1.2 Hydrology
One crest gauge was installed within the project site at the downstream end of Glade Creek.
Crest gauge readings will be collected during each site visit to document bankfull events.
5.1.3 Vegetation
A total of six vegetation monitoring plots were established based on the CVS -EEP protocol (Lee
et al. 2008). They are comprised of four standard 10 x 10 meter and two non - standard 5 x 20
meter plots. Approximately 0.025 -acre in size, vegetation plots were established and data was
Glade Creek Final 12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

collected to document baseline vegetation conditions. Annual monitoring will determine the
success of planted vegetation and the overall trajectory of woody plant restoration and
regeneration at the project site. Plots were placed within the riparian planting zone to capture the
dominate vegetative community within the project site. Vegetation monitoring plot corners were
marked with rebar, metal t- posts, and PVC conduit. Plot corners and planted stems were also
marked with fluorescent orange flagging tape. The vegetation plot origin was labeled with the
plot number. Data for the baseline report were collected according to the CVS -EEP Level I
protocol and entered into the CVS -EEP Data Entry Tool (Version 4.2). Subsequent annual
monitoring data collections will follow Level II (Lee et al. 2008).
5.1.4 Permanent Photo Locations
Permanent photo stations were established at each cross - section to digitally document annual
conditions. Each vegetation monitoring plot includes a photo station taken diagonally from the
origin towards the opposite plot corner. Additionally, seven permanent photo stations were
established throughout the project area to provide representative digital documentation of stream
features and vegetation conditions. Permanent photo stations were marked with rebar, labeled
wooden stakes, and red flagging tape.
5.1.5 Visual Assessment
Visual stream assessments will occur during annual monitoring to summarize performance
percentages of morphological and structural feature categories. Visual vegetation assessments
will occur to catalog the extent and type of vegetation issue areas as compared to the total
planted acreage within the project site.
5.2 As -Built Conditions
The project's as -built conditions are included in Appendix B — As -built Plan View.
5.2.1 Streams
Baseline stream monitoring data were collected in May 2011. Data are summarized in Tables 5
and 6, while cross - section and longitudinal profile graphics are located in Appendices C and D.
In general, the restored and enhanced stream pattern was similar to the proposed design. The
design Rosgen classification was a C4 for the Glade Creek and unnamed tributary reaches.
Based on the as -built conditions, the restored reaches classify as C stream types.
5.2.2 Vegetation
Baseline vegetation monitoring data were collected in May 2011. Vegetation plot attribute data
are included in Tables 7 and 8, whereas individual plot photos are included in Appendix E.
Individual plant species by plot and plot means are reported in Table 9. Stem counts for each of
the eight vegetation monitoring plots were recorded by species.
Approved substitutions from the proposed planting plan included Southern crabapple Malus
angustifolia for flowering dogwood CornusFlorida, redbud Cercis canadensis for sourwood
Oxydendrum arboretum, persimmon Diospyros virginiana for American hornbeam Carpinus
caroliniana, and red chokeberry Prunus virginiana for serviceberry Amelanchier arborea.
Additionally, mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia was planted in addition to the Rhododendron
Rhododendron sp. The planted area consisted of approximately 4.31 acres, which combined
Glade Creek Final 13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

with the undisturbed forested areas within the project site results in a total of 14.24 vegetated
acres within the easement area.
Results from the baseline data indicate a planted stem density ranging from 567 to 931 stems per
acre. The average stem density for the entire restoration site is 715 stems per acre; of these,
100% were noted to have either good or excellent vigor values. In addition, invasive exotic
plants such as oriental bittersweet Celastrus orbiculatus, Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera
japonica, Japanese barberry Berberis thunbergii, Japanese spiraea Spiraea japonica, and
multiflora rose Rosa multiflora were recorded at the project site.
5.2.3 Permanent Photo Stations
Photos were collected during April 2011 at the seven permanent photo stations established
throughout the project area to provide representative digital documentation of baseline stream
and vegetation conditions (Appendix F — Permanent Photo Station Photos). Representative pre -
construction photos are included in Appendix F.
Glade Creek Final 14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 5. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Glade Creek / Project No. 854 - Glade Creek (2,558 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Desi n
As-Built/ Baseline
Dimension &Substrate - RUfle
LL
UL
Fq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (R)
-
-
-
-
447
-
-
-
-
-
307
-
-
-
-
-
340
-
352
432
449
477
59
4
Floodp rune Width (ft)
-
45
-
-
-
-
-
70
-
-
-
-
-
>76
-
688
891
890
1094
225
4
Bankfull M can Depth (fl)
-
-
-
-
141
-
-
-
-
-
190
-
-
-
-
-
156
-
09
12
12
13
02
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
23
-
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
17
I8
19
19
01
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
-
-
63 0
-
-
-
-
-
574
-
-
-
-
-
530
-
416
49 1
463
622
9 1
4
Width/Depth Ratio
-
317
-
-
-
-
-
164
-
-
-
-
-
220
-
276
390
369
622
113
4
Entrenchment Ratio
-
60
-
-
-
-
-
2 3
-
-
-
-
-
>2 2
-
1 5
2 1
2 2
26
05
4
Bank Height Ratio
1 2
-
-
3 0
-
-
-
1 0
-
-
-
-
-
1 0
-
1 0
10
10
1 0
00
4
d50 (rranl
-
12 5
-
-
-
-
-
580
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Profide
Riffle Lengh(ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
146
353
318
549
131
18
Riffle Slope(ft /ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0002
0011
0010
0025
0006
18
Pool Lenyxh(ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
72
417
446
749
228
30
Pool Max Depth(ft)
-
57
-
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
-
-
-
44
-
32
41
41
56
07
31
Pool Spacing (ft)
110
-
-
228
-
7
-
224
-
-
-
-
91
-
155
10 7
84 5
98 5
162 5
51 0
29
Pool Volume (ft')
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft).
77
-
-
184
1
8
1 90
1
104
-
-
55
-
134
1 593
76 7
74 5 1
92 I 1112
2
1 12
Radius of Curvature (ftl
34
-
-
118
-
8
76
-
-
135
-
-
53
-
172
417
579
503
1010
1780
IS
Rc Bankfull Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MwnderWavelengh(ft)l
I
1
1 66 1
-
403
1
1 10
1 -
1 350 1
1 -
1 -
-
136
1
261
1163 9
223 6
230 7
259 1
28 34
13
Meander Width Rano
36
-
-
18 7
-
-
29
-
-
34
-
-
1 6
-
4 0
1 6
I S
1 7
2 1
026
4
S ubstrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
-
-
25% /9% /49 %/16% 2%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /BC%
-
-
d16/135/d50 /184 /195 /di° /&I(iiini)
0136/087/125/114 / - / -/-
017/29/58/180/300 / -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ftt
041
-
039
036
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
I1
-
10
21
Stream Power (Transport Ca Wit ) W /mi
-
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Dnonalge Area (mii)
46
68
Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<1%
Q%
Ros6e, Classification
C, 41F4/C,4
C4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
3 3
N/A
3 8
Bankfull Discharge(cfs)
267 - 352
200
375
200
Valley Length (ft)
2,180
-
2,180
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,569
-
2,555
2,558
Sinuosity
1 18
1 10
1 17
1 17
Water Surface Slupe(ft /ft)
-
-
-
00055
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0 005
0 014
0 004
00050
Bankfull Floodplain A= (acres)
-
-
-
Prop onion Over Wide ( %)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Inci —it Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
Very High - Moderate
-
Channel Stabilay or Habitat Metnc
-
-
Biolog -1 or Other
-
-
- Informatwn unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
N.
V .-A
Glade Creek Final 15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 5. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Glade Creek / Project No. 854 - Unnamed Tributary (265 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curse
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference
Reach Data
Design
As- Built/ Baseline
Dimension &Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
N
Mtn
Mean
Max
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width(ft)
-
-
-
-
126
-
-
-
-
-
307
-
-
-
-
120
-
173
181
181
189
N/A
2
F loodprone Width (ft)
13
-
-
25
-
-
-
70
-
-
-
-
144
-
33 5
37 7
37 7
41 8
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft)
-
-
-
-
08
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
rSD
-
-
07
-
07
08
08
08
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
-
10
-
12
13
13
13
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 111)
9 9
-
-
-
-
-
57 4
-
-
-
-
8 2
-
I2 7
13 0
13 0
13 2
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
-
16 0
-
-
-
-
-
16 4
-
-
-
-
IS 0
-
22 7
25 5
25 5
28 3
N/A
Entrenchment Ratm
1 1
-
-
2 0
-
-
-
2 3
-
-
-
-
>2 2
-
1 9
_2 l
2 1
2 2
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
-
>2 0
-
-
-
-
-
1 0
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
1 0
10.
10
1 0
N/A
2
d50 (mm)
-
27
-
-
-
-
-
58
Pra le
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
58
103
103
146
40
6
Riffle Slope(ft /ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0001
0017
0015
0034
0011
6
Pool Length(ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
36
133
108
295
85
9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
35
-
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
I8
27
26
34
05
7
Pool Spacing(ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224
-
-
-
-
31
-
56
55
341
315
598
208
7
Pool Volume(ftal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
57
-
-
79
-
7
1 90 1
-
-
104
-
-
30
1
1 45
1 28 61
343
1 3611
37 I
1 3 51
1 5
Radius of Curvature (ft)
I7
-
-
71
-
10
76
-
-
135
-
-
27
-
33
17 I
19 B
1951
22 5
2 21
5
Rc Bankfull Width (ft)
_
-
-
-
-
-6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MwnderWavelengthffl)l
I
1
1 66 1
1
93 1
1 6
1 - 1
350
1
1 -
1 -
-
75
-
84
664
1 77 7
1 8271
839
1 978
3
M eander Width Ratiol
I
1
1 45 1
1
63 1
1 -
1 29 1
-
1
1 34
1
1 25
1
1 38
1 9
1 20
1 20
1 21
1 N/A
1 20
Substrate, Red and Transport Parameters
Ri %/ Ru % /P % /G % /S%
-
-
24%/11%/47% /16 %/2%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
-
-
d16/d35 /150 /d84 /d95 /dt ° / di' (nun)
03/11/27/85/115 / -/-
017/29/58/180/300 / -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
052
-
0 17
030
M dx Pan Sae (mm) Mobilaed at Bankfull
15
-
3
65
&ream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m'
-
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (rtu'1
08
68
Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<I%
'1%
Rosgea Cldss[ficdtion
C4
C4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
2
N/A
24
Bankfu0 Discharge (cfs)
76-98
20
375
20
Valley Length (ft)
175
-
226
Channel Thelweg Length (ft)
300
-
275
265
Sinuosity
171
110
122
117
Water Surface Slope(ft /ft)
-
-
-
00064
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0 011
0 014
0 006
00058
Bankfull Floodplarn Area (acres)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide ( %)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEH[
Very High
-
Channel Stdbihry or Habitat Metnc
-
-
Biolopeal or Other
-
-
N/A -Item does not apply
No_-
Applicable.
Glade Creek Final 16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

n.
c
v
b
Q
z
rC. O
. N
bOA N
ti
U
Q U
b N
cOd Q
C
O
M
O
C
0
U
c
0
O
W
x
0
c
a-
W
0
by
C
C V O
Li+ 0op
X rO
U- Z
cd
U •�
0. �Q
O
O
M
M
eq
o
�
o
V
U
�
M
D,
N
vi
O
N
Q
vii
O
'�
00
N
O
n
Q
kn
�
� w
;01
Q v
V n
V O
/.
y U
U
U
a U
iyr i,
00
cq
A 800
�
w
•a vj QI
a�
� �
d
y
.M-i
�
U
O�
O�
�
r
M
O
DD
Q
y
O
N
00
M
r
41
O
O
O\
Q
_
_
b
O
CIO
3
Ica
o
?
un
3
lu
X
acli
o
v
C1
Q
v
Gq
�
X
�
X
q
U
A
U
n.
c
v
b
Q
z
rC. O
. N
bOA N
ti
U
Q U
b N
cOd Q
C
O
M
O
C
0
U
c
0
O
W
x
0
c
a-
W
0
by
C
C V O
Li+ 0op
X rO
U- Z
cd
U •�
0. �Q

Table 6. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Glade Creek / Project No. 854 - Unnamed Tributary (265 feet)
Cross - Section 7
Riffle
Cross- Section 8
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,604
2,602
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.3
18.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
33.5
41.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1_3
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
13.2
12.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.7
28.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
13.2
12.7
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
rviH - item aoes not apply.
Glade Creek Final 18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Attribute Data
Glade Creek / Pro'ect No. 854
Plot ID
Community Type
Planting
Zone ID
Reach ID
Associated
Gauges
CVS
Level
VP 1
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
Glade Creek
N/A
I
VP 2
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
Glade Creek
N/A
I
VP 3
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
Glade Creek
N/A
I
VP 4
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
Glade Creek
N/A
I
VP 5
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
Glade Creek
N/A
I
VP 6
Piedmont /Mountain Levee Forest
1
UT -Lower
N/A
I
Glade Creek Final 19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Glade Creek / Project No. 854
Report Prepared By
Kevin Mitchell
Date Prepared
5/12/2011 16:57
Database Name
Equinox -201 I- A- GladeCreek- MYO.mdb
Database Location
Z: \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \Glade Creek \Glade -MYO -201 1 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
D16TNK71
File Size
148082944
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEEI'S IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary ofproject(s) and project
data.
Project Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED sterns per acre, for each year. This excludes live
stakes
Project Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes,
all planted sterns, and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc ).
Vigor
Frequency distribution ofvigorclasses forstems forall plots.
Vigor by Species
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with numberof occurrences and percent of total stems
impacted by each.
Damage by Species
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Species
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and
missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
854
project Name
Glade Creek
Description
River Basin
New
Length(ft)
Stream- to-Edge Width (ft)
Area (s q m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
6
Glade Creek Final 20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc,
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

..C. O
N
N
y E
U
Q U
C/O-Q�
C
O
m
y
c
0
U
c
U
E
O
F.
G
W
x
0
c
O'
W
on
c
O
O
Oc O
z�
U •�
U y
2
cc
S, 4
0.
b
x
O
e
m
C
0.
x
�
N
�
O
p�
e
�
O
4
�
x
p
av
e
F
—
e
a
_
o0
a
�
`
a
4
M
e
�
y o
e
4
�
�
aLu
m
c
4
a
y
N
OM•
O �
O
U
O
e
M
N
P
�
F
C
4
W
ww
'a
e
u
C
x
4
V
E
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
`"
rn
ai
vi
vsi
vLi
F
a�
F
F
F
vi
N
U
O
C
L
C
E
C
L
G
L
a
G
L
9
O
a
¢
u
v¢
3
z
F�<
c
o
z
0
9
3
C
�
c
a
y
v
L
0.
a
-_:
E
r
�
�
5
�
a
�
°
•o
..C. O
N
N
y E
U
Q U
C/O-Q�
C
O
m
y
c
0
U
c
U
E
O
F.
G
W
x
0
c
O'
W
on
c
O
O
Oc O
z�
U •�
U y
2
cc
S, 4

6.0 REFERENCES
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, CO.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2009. New River Basin.
Restoration Priorities. Raleigh, NC.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). December 2007. Restoration Plan.
Glade Creek Stream Restoration. Alleghany County North Carolina. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorpho logical Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. In:
Wang, S.S.Y, E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. pp. 12 -22.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A Practical Method of Computing Streambank Erosion Rate. Wildland
Hydrology, Inc. Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of Natural Communities of North
Carolina, 3rd Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDEHNR,
Division of Parks and Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality. Wilmington, North
Carolina.
Glade Creek Final 22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0

Appendix A
Monitoring Plan View

3
a,
c
�L
O
C
O
M�-
N
E C
x C O
C%3 O - fC
CL co `° 2
Q 2 m
O ° ai N V!
coo cr a v C. m —
N a) o -NO m co
m > c N
C w a 0 -t= n in ` 0 0 0
H Y J U
oil
4
0
w
w
U
z
0
a °
c o
� a
A �
a> O
r.
tz o
p� N
a)
O
z
< o
O C :
0. e
aW
z a
w
a z
CC
a
U
w
cn
�z
w
o
Va
one
N
Q1
C
U ° �
ci
O
th
in
Q
b
N
�
Q
N
O
O
N
o
a
o
cc
C
m
N
U
j)
O
a
0
C
C
.0
a
0
o)
rn
sm
o
o
a��i
c
>
-j_
a
U
C
U
U
C
�
4
0
w
w
U
z
0
a °
c o
� a
A �
a> O
r.
tz o
p� N
a)
O
z
< o
O C :
0. e
aW
z a
w
a z
CC
U
cn
�z
w
o
Va
one
U ° �
ci
th
� QI
u
'o
a
y
o
CC
c
H Oct
W

Appendix B
As -Built Plan View

m O U) s
edgo- �Y s �o Y z Xzz} F— LL
o wO �z
w�Kpo Z'
v�( = g, U ~� FOO 2 d sx a
a w z w m a m w $• �, ° v �e O R O g z LLl n�augp�
Q�� >- • s�
onmdr `��...... d.
? "" N _ o i o �" J O
S °EE" ww a" mom 4 OWV
yaS�no �O>�teV d P 5k �W UQ 0 iyt
- aaomoo 1`®e1 e Sde3 CO
rc ` � uunn
N
z
_O
I~i ~
a
^U
N
J
It w
N H
U
a m�
Z F (n
r d LL }
J
Z
N m
= O �Oz
N
WII (n C7
Q p w
Y =
(L W CL
mcn z z �z}
z x OOm
x p
N oo j u) w(n
~ p w w Z m U J p
W m (n (A Q 0 <
LLJ � LD L7 L7 L7 L7 L7 (n (n Q i (O x W-
>- >
Z Z Z Z Z Z m w z F LL p
(n Lf) ��a r33333 >- OQZ Ww CO LL W W m LL
LL
=QOOOOOOrr(' W dQ�Um
W
O NOOOOOO 0QJW
LdZmmmmmmm0 p mWQ3
X GJ
J W O O O O O O m m z LL w H-
�C7000UUU i Q m m O U z
W WWWWWWW(nNJ w u) WD
0 �JmmmmmmQQLL LL (n (n W O�
z C01�000'm� > 0JpmHQ
Woo
— JOU>
OU) w > p �
m >0°POR-
0<60w�-w
(nz< w 0 0
- Z r (V c7 V 10 z
F w \
m of Z
O "r
2 '
S .• ij.
o
Ilk, I N�iYU'I �V:
o
W
/1•/ -- a m=
l�
r /
W
U) o w ma
y I
In
0
C�
V a IIA,.
w
m�
U� / X
N w a
a
4 J W Q
1 w
N Z Q
O U
ft
u m O
OLL,� N
L w - x
W Wow H
W w J N W
N � =per O
w?¢wma
ww
h 0 3 O J H
Z } H U
tr X ❑
Ir 3�0 z<NfO F�
z) 3
LL U ❑0w ~ Q
>a�
m �
F.O�a�P y Cl( 3�jza<o
R - o Fw- Uo4 n NOO �
m z��_n9z
Z NO O =w.00E,2
U �g Mw Z owz
> p� O g w w w o l w w
LJ U Y Y w� Q Y
F Z W 0 Q Q W W Q
H Q O Ir T f 0 ^m
J J ❑ LL.-N M «NO
f
m
7
N
N
°o

\
�
0
2
I
O
-i
_
z
$
-j
. !
}
\
k
\ \
2
2% �g
§
\�
e
\
_
) (
§
(
\
\
£
§ \ §
w2Z }�
2
�
O
\\
§ ( /
\ }
\ }
\
°
z
\/
/
Z
&
/ \g j)
m
§
/I
§ § §
a!=
}LLJ
!/\
A !I}
■© !
L w o zy
5z
c0
2 0
/
§
`
\
Of
Of &f
\ (
/|/
) /)i
\
)
(n a.
Cl)
g
\
« 0 ±2
ƒ d
e 2
j
j
j
§ )
§0
m
;
\
�
0
2
I
O
-i
_
z
$
-j
cl
{
LU
z Go
\ \ \
§ § §
� )
§
0 \ \
\ \ \
�
»
2 §
§ ) k
\ ( � \ (
I r ) 2 § w Z )
d \ \ \ § \ \ k
) ) ) \ § K § ) )
\ �
;
\
k
\ \
!
§
&
e
\
_
) (
§
(
\
\
} §
§ \ §
)
§
§ /
\ §
§ ( /
\ }
\ }
\
°
z
?
- - -
Z
§ §
§ §
§ § §
cl
{
LU
z Go
\ \ \
§ § §
� )
§
0 \ \
\ \ \
�
»
2 §
§ ) k
\ ( � \ (
I r ) 2 § w Z )
d \ \ \ § \ \ k
) ) ) \ § K § ) )
\ �
;
,|
§
\
k
§
\
/
) (
§
\ \
\ /
(
\ \
§
\ }
\ }
\
} }
Z
§
4
}LLJ
§
/
§
`
\
\ (
\
)
(n a.
Cl)
k=
e 2
j
j
j
§ )
§0
af
}
,|
§
k
§
\
/
) (
§
\ \
\ /
(
\ \
\ }
\ }
\
} }
,|
§

z
oo
o .7 aq�I
A i
0
w
m
rn a
ci
u•
m o
o a
w i°
n o.
Y
`—
v_� tz
z
—
w
\
W =
d'
z
LL
O
\
y Z O
0
H
CJ
3z
F
r
s
e
f N
a
o
w
m
z
z
z
zd
za
N s E �C7 ld Z
y N R LL �l 0
gg
gcfi$c �Emi$ Z. fiN Ucn� ZU
OIXO 5z
° `gig '9 7 d:�....sy�,
s (9 U U
N -
�� °� iP a W 2 LU
;p 2F _� �Sd 15 �� UQ y w z d'po3y3•r
0 .gi E
40 1
uj
7,
♦ R
i•��.�gjctl
,i
r /r
r •
- r
• r Ii!
�``v
'r
Vm &
<e" -e�4�
f�
fg
m
8^
!%
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
0
Co
0
3 )g
g^
�g
8 /
J /
Oa /
U O O
jX� /
m m w
O O
/
z
oo
o .7 aq�I
A i
Y
m
\
LL
O
\
0
H
'r
Vm &
<e" -e�4�
f�
fg
m
8^
!%
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
0
Co
0
3 )g
g^
�g
8 /
J /
Oa /
U O O
jX� /
m m w
O O
/
z
oo
o .7 aq�I
A i
m
V)
N
o°

Z Cl)
V 2 (103 9:(j 0
�elz cma z U-
z
all LWLI 0
A R I I
0 s cl) (Ir
7 '111 1
LLJ LZU
W own
U N
MI
0 L) W
�o
WLU
of
co
Hg
lb
LLJ
00. 8
CD
N C\4
40
o
LLI
0
LU
2�
§ LU
0
LLI
z M 0
< ';D
Q JZ
N
0
C",
8 vo ',
cr- S�
1 W
H LL —i
M=
cl 401-
0 LU
�C) LO) WW F-
0 :D cD
Ir -1j:
W W
z Ix
5 z CL
LLI
Q- cn w Lf) 0 o W 0
1-- 0 L)
0) m
CO U- z
o 2
cl
W c!) Z 0
z
We :ZS
Q t7
CO LL
z
0 Ecul U)
L) w
z
z
W
ea` a55 V 2 FR co
W W L"
n U-
0
T -4 R cl Iq Uj
U-
lZ go
z M
i'I \ 0 =D
— - - - — - --- - - - - - - - R
LU
ui �P
=) CO
CZ
Z CO
0
W
Im
W j
gig
o
9N
LU
so
Z F5
LL
65
W
W W Z
8 W W W 1'. P,
> > >
��o�m�m�m�m�m�m�

r-
z
W Y
z U
Z O
O
J W
m
z'
h
Q
W
�s
U N z�
UI
b
0 i,
9�
Lu
W
(7
Z
W
m Q
U
CL
W
Q
co
h UJ Y
U
O
Y
�a
O
O\
/d
�IIIr
�:m
i5 w
ui
C
W O
ui
o-
J
�
h UJ Y
U
O
Q
8
00
8 LU m
02
p
k
4
R
LL
n c
i'
o
N
o�S(q
i4
�yQ�n �zy
ui43 M
jod$;�� o
3R ---
Y m
o
0 jga oy
¢�qjj o
� qy Amy
o 0
O w
m a
co
ti'i
LL W
p U
m<
4.1
m<
p H.
O U
m<
m<
m<
m<
W0
S
a
y
W
W
/d
�IIIr
�:m
i5 w
ui
C
W O
ui
PF
0
W
U
W Z
H �
LL- w
O
N J
0 U)
U) -.1
Fit
in =w
J
All
E
°u) a c9 t�
8 Y�Z OZ Z U-
0
Lo
LLJ
a' U'
WJ r
A `� �W to 0
Z O Lu
ow
w LL O w
a
!E R
aw�CaDi
w0ZZ'
H5UO,
H CO W U
Z U < LL.
a
m
N
0
o-
J
�
h UJ Y
U
O
Q
8
00
8 LU m
02
p
O W
LL
w
H W L
O a OW
�)
�+
O
WO W
CD
~ Z
co vJ
W
� Q
W =
W
O w
m a
co
PF
0
W
U
W Z
H �
LL- w
O
N J
0 U)
U) -.1
Fit
in =w
J
All
E
°u) a c9 t�
8 Y�Z OZ Z U-
0
Lo
LLJ
a' U'
WJ r
A `� �W to 0
Z O Lu
ow
w LL O w
a
!E R
aw�CaDi
w0ZZ'
H5UO,
H CO W U
Z U < LL.
a
m
N
0

ZI
O
J
W
p
Q
p
ow Q s
z
` -
p p W Z
`p Z Z _
O O O
Z Z
a w
\ <
, S
9
<
w
-
S o
S F
Z
U)
U)
a 0
z
�
> a
O
�C7
WgZ ZZ
LL
IQ
o
2 sa s_o
RI
A
T
w
O
oO
LwJ Oizz
>
5
m Q
m Q
m Q
m Q
As sps�
WF Z
0 rc
Q }
wp
>
z Q
S
S
S
v
W :
g
N w
wz
3 O
p gZ
o
N d€
Yi
a
z�
JQO �W
c7w() _�
O
e
w
jw
a
N
z
oa000
z
>
w
>d
z
Q
z
U'
0 rcEam$
(n
ff
r
s
ZI
O
J
W
p
Q
p
ow Q s
z
0 Lou
Z W
p p W Z
`p Z Z _
O O O
Z Z
a w
\ <
, S
9
<
w
-
S o
S F
8 8
----
0 2
a 0
z
�
�
1
IQ
o
R
T
w
O
z
m Q
m Q
m Q
m Q
m Q
WF Z
¢
r
m
z Q
S
S
S
v
v
N w
wz
3 O
o
F r
w
jw
a
N
z
oa000
z
>
w
>d
z
Q
z
U'
\1
ca
LU
_ �Sit�tri;
r.-
•
Ipt
Y
O o
0
<%
p
p
Q
p
p
Z
Q
p
O
O
Ix
0
O p
w w
Z M
a O
C7 w
O
J p
0
A
z ,
1
m
K
O
0 Lou
Z W
p p W Z
`p Z Z _
O O O
Z Z
a w
\ <
, S
" Q ~
��
Z Z
5133HS 33S - 05 +5 'b'1S - NIIHOlb'W
W
o0>o
0 ca°
0
O p
w w
Z M
a O
C7 w
O
J p
0
A
z ,
1
m
K
O

z CO
Z L
aF �
1► w0(n � L
3: c O
W w i
e
pp
uj
0 ------- 0
0 105 CO 11 w
•
•
O
z N
I.6g 6Z
I 6ZZZ
0)
J I
w
00 4.1
fsC
0I
J i
E
/ <qb
II
ZO
6
LU
C3 1
N J�C
190
00
w=
�F
a
�r
4t,
i Zoo
I
/Z W
8 a w
I / O
LL
3
w
(�
I d
N /
m
1�
Yf Yf
A
h O
O A
A
i =
m -z o
8111111
�w
M
i
M
Oil
c
ffi
1-- ypyp11
U
m<
m<
m<
m<
LL W
O U
m<
m<
O U
m<
AS
c�
O
ig
N
R
•
•
O
z N
I.6g 6Z
I 6ZZZ
0)
J I
w
00 4.1
fsC
0I
J i
E
/ <qb
II
ZO
6
LU
C3 1
N J�C
190
00
w=
�F
a
�r
4t,
i Zoo
I
/Z W
8 a w
I / O
LL
3
w
(�
I d
N /
H
zM
we
PEP
C)
°~
.Z
N
i =
m -z o
�w
��
�1l l
9
his
�S
W
0
cr co
w �
a w
o�
poi
w Q w
O
w
z
m d U
K
t R sg
SS o$_C�Ji
,rz, yS.i
gf�e:
i
a
r
m
8

o� U t
_ CD
E a �
Za@ YlZ NZ Z LL
E O
C �
� � _ � w0� oZ � C)j ww° °
W� °� °Z o
C �y uuu�u
N N iE� ,r l [�a JvWw xw w _
r�
w
=0
Ln
L
Y �
Z
LOa6l S
age
u�
°oz. 4,
ON
-Vi
'I�
Fo• ! u
m 2
ry
o 0
0 o
h v;
ry ry
o ry
m
m�y
m ry
m
o`
m v�
vv`
♦
m m
o�p
m3(�
m m
m m
ry
v
qy$m$�
rig
o
0
}jQ
c
�
�y
I
�gQq{
#�j
yq�p
H+
m <
+H+<
m<
SI
lV
i
a
F fJ
a
w
-90 :co
..10 SOoOZ N —
LU
LU
I
O mss' 8
Fwd
O Wy
LU C
Z
Z W
r
i
m
7
0
°oz. 4,
ON
-Vi
'I�
Fo• ! u
m 2
LU
LU
I
O mss' 8
Fwd
O Wy
LU C
Z
Z W
r
i
m
7
0

I P O_ u)
$yy a ss ]]CC
Ftttttg1111 �
€8 _ wpb 3:z O
e oo Z)
Uw LU
"B �� fla 8p a WwQ ¢} mrn b
m PH gyp � 0�� }a (�(n
E. o i JQ� �= Q(n
7{ @ �1 g3 c 't Fc`j
E; o 'a l �' +1 V O W w O €' m
`gi- �I i. a � �W UQ
$3 s
4
$R�
m �
z
R $ R
� g
gg R � IB
i
8 8 8 8 8g g
R 8
O
t
O
- - F
w
N
Z
2
a
U
Q
Fs]
8 R 8 = 8 A
0 0 0 0
H r R
SOT
R R 9 8
R 8 8
R
JR
R r ... _
I
R

s=
��
a5
moo
=
-
Z
O U)
P:(!) =Z
w z
�0� Oj
)U) w�
Z
JU
�W
-
Ai
-
R
O
Y
^�
m
mEZ
a "
�O
xe
_ i
r
Q�� ��
J .0 ww
wW
LU Iii
<U)
O
a
��►
UQ
g
r
it
F81
g g
�
$
8
g
F81
N
N
r
�
m
W"
F81
FM
ui
� � r
s
s
a
_.
s
s
s
a
>e
s
Fal
F81
s
r r
R 8 R
r
M
u-i
+
N
I
0
w
N
..
Fsl
w
Z
U
Z
8
R
9
5?
$
$
R.
$
.....
a
FR
a
�
a
- _
s
a �

i
i
i
I
I
i
k
I
I
k
t
kk
k\
r�w
e�
r�o
w i �
D zi�f
C Q�qu
O
a 5
synapp_
U 2WZg�
a =xzR
z
ILL'imis
o a
TsE
g�
a��FFnFFFFFF
W
'n nF'n FFF
rz
g
NOO
ibs
i
Z
w n
N
e9sga .aa aaa
�:d"2A2ee2lli li
;aaa .o
€llll ]i 11 li
ll
........
�II tllYli tl tit
22222:
Z
ram
p s
$ €!
E
7
azw
c2 w
@�
co.c 4
y
°Z =z
z�
Is
�q�g3�����
2
x
p2pgY�5gg�
68 e8 ��E�
gS� i5i5�
i Ba S
�g€€ikgt
R 1e it 11a
E;�
Y33aoaea ®asap
aeaaaaa
aaaaeaaae�
w a
Zy
Egg
�r
3`3`3RRRRRRRRR
RRRRRRR
RRRRRRRR
Y
W� ZY
r
zZr0
NOr
0 0
�Z
m
Mu
z��
0tq
ac
6z
00
zz�
=gt=
€}ie
�oz�8WW
ca mjE2= m _
'-
ai�"t=ir
ggyiF
08a o
N
= »s
��
ry =g!c
N
$i4
do
W
rn a c
c saF;
Egg^
O�
` i9 uy y
LLJw0 Z}
ga
Z
F
Q
_ a
A
i
Q�Q
Nnmu
9 n
as F o
O W C7
i-
xw
d
:�iacwrr�+'s
m'
O C � "H
HIM
U)
Y NN
i
i
i
I
I
i
k
I
I
k
t
kk
k\
r�w
e�
r�o
w i �
D zi�f
C Q�qu
O
a 5
synapp_
U 2WZg�
a =xzR
z
ILL'imis
o a
TsE
g�
a��FFnFFFFFF
FFFnnFF
'n nF'n FFF
rz
g
NOO
ibs
i
w n
N
e9sga .aa aaa
�:d"2A2ee2lli li
;aaa .o
€llll ]i 11 li
ll
........
�II tllYli tl tit
22222:
O
ages c
p s
$ €!
E
7
azw
c2 w
n
co.c 4
y
g,
www<
B
a$
Is
�q�g3�����
2
mf
[EZ5
p2pgY�5gg�
68 e8 ��E�
gS� i5i5�
i Ba S
�g€€ikgt
R 1e it 11a
E;�
Y33aoaea ®asap
aeaaaaa
aaaaeaaae�
w a
Zy
Egg
�r
3`3`3RRRRRRRRR
RRRRRRR
RRRRRRRR
�y a6
c �
zZr0
NOr
0 0
�Z
m
Mu
z��
0tq
ac
O w
N W
00
zz�
=gt=
€}ie
�oz�8WW
ca mjE2= m _
'-
ai�"t=ir
ggyiF
08a o
N
W W
0
_ N N
m
W
O
N
!!! !!
!
!! !!!
!p!
L.O. !!
ter'
i
Y
rz
g
NOO
ibs
i
w n
N
o
3
e€
9
O
ages c
p s
$ €!
7
azw
c2 w
�F
co.c 4
y
Ilk
11111
�
8
2
j.
'
v
g
.�gg8
$LLB
z
U
W
q��a
�0�11w���
w a
Zy
0
w
X-0C
OHO C
C LL q
mZ
�y a6
c �
zZr0
NOr
0 0
�Z
m
Mu
z��
0tq
w ci m m
y iY
$eo¢R
O w
N W
00
zz�
�5
P
zU)
�oz�8WW
ca mjE2= m _
'-
ai�"t=ir
ggyiF
08a o
N
= »s
��
ry =g!c
N
$i4
do
N
W W
0
_ N N
m
W
O
N
!!! !!
!
!! !!!
!p!
L.O. !!
ter'
i
a
s
N
9
0
Y
rz
g
NOO
i
w n
N
o
FNrZ E
zZaa
NN WZ
O
ages c
z =-WDI
1J
azw
c2 w
�
co.c 4
y
y F
NFU
v
g
.�gg8
$LLB
z
U
W
q��a
�0�11w���
w a
Zy
0
w
X-0C
OHO C
C LL q
mZ
�y a6
c �
zZr0
NOr
0 0
�Z
m
Mu
z��
0tq
w ci m m
y iY
$eo¢R
O w
N W
00
zz�
�5
P
zU)
�oz�8WW
ca mjE2= m _
'-
ai�"t=ir
w 5n
08a o
N
= »s
r iL CO
z
co CL
N
a
s
N
9
0

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos

w
� M
U
O
i.
U
O
N
O
rr
0
r.
O
O
O
Q
0
T
O
o �
0
O
R
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
pO
00 P �O V1 7 M N .• O O
N N N N N N N N N
(;aa3) uoi;enal:4
M�
FBI
O
N
O
0
r0 O
. N
to N
V
Q U
b N
c�C Q
C
O
m
7
ti
C
O
U
a
0
L_
7
W
K
O
W
I
O
U
hq
p d• O
0
u" 00 G
X �O
U � G
uz„
U
U U
m o
5 aGa

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

O
O
a
C
O
a
c
0
U
c�
ti
O
U
O
O O
� U C
O O
U
U
x
b
G
0.
Q
N N N N N N N N N
(;aa3) u04enal:4
0
N
O
00
0
O
O
O
0
C �
. N
Oq a`i
Q U
'C N
ro
Q
c
0
7
C
O
U
C
U
C
O
a.
C
W
x
0
a
Q'
W
O
w
o
�
I
a�
I
a�
�
O
C
C
N
O
U
�
�
O
O
1
+
T0
0
N
+
O
O_
+
O
H
El
O
U
C
C � O
0
u" 00 C
v
°' o
U Z v
U •�
�d .0 y
C7a`oo

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

O
O
a
73
c
0
c%
G
O
U
O
N
y
0
U
w
� M M
U � +
O �
U
U
x
b
C
a
a
d
N N N N N N N N N
( ;aa3) uouenaj:j
O
00
+
0
tn
n
0
O
+
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
w
o �
O .fir
a
0
0
0
N
+
O
O
N
+
O
+
O
_O
+
O
p�
O
pO
� O
O
N
I
I
I
0
N
0
0
'i
..0. O
. N
•y t
d
Q �
cp
C
O
7
O
U
A
c
E
0
c
w
x
0
a
c
W
cv
O
by
C
6 C
G � O
k 0 'C
O
y O
U Z
U .0
'O 'O
y
� o^ cc
a
c7`X

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

y
O
O
s
0.
�o
0
a
c
0
0
U
�O
U c �
^O v
O y A
y �
U
U
x
N
a
Q
C\ 00 l- �o N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N
(;aa3) uo►;enaj:j
O
00
0
0
0
r
0
O
O
0
0
0
0
o �
w
+ C
O �
O
O
0
N
+
O
O
N
+
O
+
O
O
+
O
o�
O
H
E'
� O
0
N
4.
C1
I
I
I
O'
N
O
O
I
. N
oq v
.N A
v
Q �
b v
c Ca
c
0
c
0
U
IM
C
E
C
O
w..
C
W
x
0
c
o-
W
0
U
O
N
C
0000 C
Y O
� o �
U Z o
U •CN U
C7 a tb

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline —May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -1 l Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 4 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 10, 2011
C -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

0
0
s
a
b
G
O
a
G
O
U
y
ti
0
U
O
O 00
a�
y�"rl
R C%] O
L �
U
U
x
b
G
a
a
O 9` 00 h �o M V M N
O o 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 �z o 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N
(;aaj) UOIjRAaj:j
0
M
+
O
N
+
O
0
0
0
0
00
0
o ,^
+
o w
O
o �
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
N
+
O
_O
+
O
pO
t
0
N
I
I
I
0
N
O
o
. N
bGA N
Q
C O
� Q
G
O
O
G
O
U
a
E
G
0
G
W
x
0
G
o-
W
M
U
O
cV
O
bq
G
C � O
u" 000 C
�O
„off
U Z
U
N O
Claw

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
C -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 5 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
C -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

0
0
0.
O
a
G
O
U
N
H
O
A
cu
C
N
� a R
N
L +
U c 0
N
O � O
L
U
U
x
C
a
Q
�D �p � 0 10
N N N N N N N N N
(;aa;) UOljf3naj'3
0
M
+
O
N
+
O
+
OO
0
0
O
0
o w
C
O
o
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
+
O
O
+
O
h4
!d
N O
0
N
w
I
I
I
O
N
tn
e
.. o
. N
bC0 N
Q E
b N
CN L'
C
O
0
y
C
O
U
C
O
C
O
4.
C
W
x
0
c
a~
w
U
O
W
C
C � O
W 00 C
Y� O
� o �
�zG
U •�
C
C7 a t�

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline —May 11, 2011
C -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
C -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

O
O
CL
C
C
H
O
a
c
0
U
N
N
y
0
V
C
VIM
F y �
� o �
L
U
V
x
b
a
Q
N N N N N N N
(;aa3) UOIWAai:j
O
O
O
O
O
tn
M
+
0
C
.. O
. N
dD a`i
'y L
N
Q U
C �
cO A
c
0
cC
C
C
Q
V
C
N
E
c
O
c
W
x
0
o-
W
tn
0
0
^, o
0
N
0
v
on
c
c c o
w 00
x o
e o
Uz
� � y
c..
o
�
I
N `'
C
O
o
t
U
O
O
O
0
0
0
tn
0
0
^, o
0
N
0
v
on
c
c c o
w 00
x o
e o
Uz
� � y

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline —May 11, 2011
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 7 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

0
0
a
b
c
as
ti
0
a
0
U
N
N
N
N
0
U
40
E
�aN
U oo 'n
C
0
L
U
U
k
C
a
d
�o N 7 M N
1 10
N N N N N N
(;aa3) UOIIUA3j:4
0
0
tn
a
+
O
0
0
M
+
0
�r
0
. N
ao i
a�
Q U
c �
cO A
c
0
co
3
N
0
U
0
c
0
W
x
0
c
c
W
tn
e
►7
�d
0 0
0
N
0
as
as
oq
c
ca 'v
c v o
� o
�� y
0
C7aai
M
00
+
O
�
tn
o
cq C
N
+
O
O
+
O
I+
0
0
r.
e
tn
e
►7
�d
0 0
0
N
0
as
as
oq
c
ca 'v
c v o
� o
�� y
0
C7aai

Appendix C
Cross- Section Plots and Photos
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Cross - Section Plots and Photos
(Looking Downstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Unnamed Tributary Downstream — Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Baseline — May 11, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
C -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile Plots

0
a
4:
O
0.
ro
c
=o
Y
0
h
N
"O O
�a
t7 �
n
Ilp
a
Q
XO
^ �O
V/
�O
tie
�O
W
L
U
OHO �
O
w
�O
w
C
1e
r
O
N
O
00
b R I I
a �
e >�O
�O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o a a a a
in to in
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Oaa;) uorjena«
c^
pp N
OO
N
N
Q d
C Q
C
0
`S
r/71
O
U
c
0
W
0
a
'a
W
a
0
d
"di
fs. 00 G
y O
uz
ld • ^' (A
0
�7r�oa
i I
I
I--
I
I
i
I
�
- - --
- --
-
- -• a
li I
a�
X
I
�
�
.11 -
---
- - --
-
1xing
f
I
�
y
>
i
i
I �
•-- '- - - -- - - - -•
x
a
aNi
�I
I
•-- ---- - - - - -•
N
x
t�
I
I
I
�
XO
^ �O
V/
�O
tie
�O
W
L
U
OHO �
O
w
�O
w
C
1e
r
O
N
O
00
b R I I
a �
e >�O
�O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o a a a a
in to in
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Oaa;) uorjena«
c^
pp N
OO
N
N
Q d
C Q
C
0
`S
r/71
O
U
c
0
W
0
a
'a
W
a
0
d
"di
fs. 00 G
y O
uz
ld • ^' (A
0
�7r�oa

N
_O
a
w
7d
G
C
O
D G +
o
O
Q
O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N
O
Cn
V7 °
N p
O
(;aa3) UOIJVA913
tih
Ox
O
Ox
1
;i
� I
C �
O
w � �
3
0
N
O
i
O
tih
,yx
�O
ti
,yx
C
r... O
N
bA a`i
N
N
A�
b^
� Q
C
m
7
N
C
O
U
C
O
E
C
O
V
a
W
x
O
C
.3
Q
W
i A
0
c
C � O
i1. ; r-
�e O
u z
� O
t7 a` w

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Baseline — May 5, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Baseline — May 5, 2011
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Baseline — May 5, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Baseline — May 5, 2011
E -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix E
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Baseline — May 5, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Baseline — May 5, 2011
E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Permanent Photo Station Photos

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 1
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
F -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 2
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
F -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 3
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
F -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 4
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
F -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions looking upstream from Photo Station 5
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
F -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Glade Creek
Pre - construction conditions looking downstream from Photo Station 5
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
Glade Creek — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Downstream — April 28, 2011
F -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
Unnamed Tributary Lower
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 6
Unnamed Tributary Lower — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
Glade Creek Final
Project No. 854
Baseline Monitoring Year 0
F -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix F
Photo Station Photos
L,
IQ-
Mar -08 -2007
Unnamed Tributary Lower
Pre - construction conditions in proximity to Photo Station 7
Unnamed Tributary Lower — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream — April 28, 2011
Glade Creek Final F -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 854 December 2011
Baseline Monitoring Year 0