WI0500328_FINAL EVALUATION_20120613

•
RECEIVEDlfENR!DWQ
June 13, 2012 UN 13 ?') COVIDJEN
.J.I.
UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-OWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
RE. Final Project Evaluation for UIC Tracer Injection Permit W10500328, Mallinckrodt LLC, Raleigh
Pharmaceutical Plant, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. EPA ID No. NCD 042 091 975,
To UIC Program Staff:
Mallinckrodt LLC is pleased to submit this Final Project Evaluation Report for the referenced UIC Permit
Application (Type 5T—Tracer injection)for our Pharmaceutical Plant located in Raleigh, North Carolina.
The purpose of this work was to define the potential groundwater velocities within and outside of a
geologic feature near the primary sources of contamination. ARCADES used the data from this tracer
injection permit as a basis for an additional injection Well Permit(WI0500499) submitted to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NDENR)— Division of Water Quality (DWO)
on March 23, 2012 that will be used to test the efficacy and establish a design basis for a in situ reactive
zone (IRZ) strategy for the site. The results from this work will be used to help develop corrective action
alternatives for the Site as directed within Mallinckrodt's Hazardous Waste Management Permit issued by
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Waste
Management, Hazardous Waste Section (HWS).
1 certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction and supervision
in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage
the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering this information, the information
submitted is; to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
If you have any comments pertaining to this UIC Permit Application, please contact Tim Roberts at (919)
878-2895, or Donald R. Malone, ARCADIS at(919)415-2275.
Sincerely,
Mallinckrodt LLC
LJ - -
R. Scott Warlick,
Plant Manager
Attachments: UIC Permit Final Project Evaluation for Tracer Injection Permit WI0500328
(2 paper copies and 1 CD containing PDF version)
CC' Katherine O'Neal, NCDENR HWS, Raleigh, NC (2 paper copies)
Karen Burke, Mallinckrodt, Hazelwood, MO (1 paper copy and 1 CD containing PDF version)
Tim Roberts, Mallinckrodt, Raleigh, NC (1 paper copy and 1 CD containing PDF version)
Donald Malone, ARCADES, Raleigh, NC (1 paper copy)
Submitted via Hand Delivery
MALLINCKROGT,LLC 919-878-280o[T]
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL 919 878 4700[FI
RALEIGH,NC
27616-3116

•
A R CA D IS
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,
Infrastructure•Water•Environment•Buildings Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Aquifer Protection Section Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
UIC Program Tel [phone]
1636 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 www.arcadis-us.com
Subject: ENVIRONMENT
Final Project Evaluation Report for UIC Permit W10500328
Mallinckrodt LLC, Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant,
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
EPA Hazardous Waste Facility ID No. NCD 042 091 975
Date:
June 10, 2012
To Aquifer Protection Section:
Contact:
In accordance with Part VII of Underground Injection Control (UIC) Permit No. Donald Malone
WI0500328, this Final Project Evaluation Report summarizes the tracer compound
injection activities and findings at the Mallinckrodt LLC (Mallinckrodt) pharmaceutical Phone
plant in Raleigh, NC (the Site). The location of the Site is shown in Figure 1. All 919.415.2275
tracer-related injection activities have been completed; therefore, the referenced UIC Email:
permit can be closed upon North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural donaid.malone@arcadis-
Resources (NCDENR), Aquifer Protection Section, UIC Program concurrence with us.com
the information contained herein. As required by the UIC permit, the Injection Event
Record was submitted on July 1, 2011. Our ref:
NC107014.0006
The initial UIC permit application was submitted to NCDENR on December 9, 2010.
Additional boring logs and a revised Site Map was then provided to Mr. David ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,
Goodrich, NCDENR, on March 18, 2011 and April 8, 2011 in response to his request Inc.
for further information. NCDENR subsequently issued UIC Permit W10500328 on NC Engineering License#C-1869
April 27, 2011 to inject Fluorescein as a tracer to confirm groundwater flow behavior NC Surveying License#C-1869
downgradient of the former Fire Training Area (Figure 2).
Introduction
The results from this work will be used to help develop corrective action alternatives
for the Site as directed within Mallinckrodt's Hazardous Waste Management Permit
issued by NCDENR, Division of Waste Management, Hazardous Waste Section.
The Site carries the Hazardous Waste Facility EPA ID No. NCD 042 091 975.

0
ARCADIS
Aquifer Protection
Section — UIC •
Program
June 11, 2012
The UIC permit was used to conduct several single-well tracer tests to define
potential groundwater velocity ranges within and outside a geological feature below
the Site that is acting as a preferential migration pathway for groundwater impacted
with the following constituents of potential concern (COPCs): 1.2-dichlorethane (1,2-
DCA); 1.2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP); acetone; methyl isobutyl ketone; phenol;
benzene, toluene. ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX); aniline, and nitrobenzene. The
presence of this preferential migration pathway is evident from the long and narrow
BTEX; 1,2-DCA; 1,2-DCP; and aniline isoconcentration lines shown on Figures 3
through 8, respectively. Potentiometric surface maps of the shallow and deep
aquifer zones are included in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. Groundwater
potentiometric surface elevations are included in Table 1; and historic groundwater
data from Site monitor well data are in Table 2.
Previous field work completed under the Interim Remedial Measures Work Plan
(ARCADIS 2008)for the Site included electrical resistivity(ER) testing to map
potential subsurface high-permeability zones that could be creating the very long and
narrow isoconcentration trends within the surficial aquifer. Three initial ER transects
(Figure 11) were installed at the Site during the week of May 24, 2010, which
identified several large conductive features in all three ER pseudo sections. These
features are likely relict structures of the interfacial contact between the Rolesville
Batholith and the Raleigh Gneiss, due to varying degree of weathering along the
contact boundary. Two additional ER survey lines were installed and tested during
the week of November 5, 2010, which were located immediately north of the central
manufacturing area near the former BQ Pond and south of Durant Road. Conductive
features were identified similar to those in prior surveys. The results of the ER
surveys indicate that a very long and narrow high conductivity zone exists below the
facility which potentially extends several miles, or more, north and south of the
facility. A copy of the report Two- Dimensional Resistivity and Magnetic Geophysical
Investigation (ARCADIS 2010) is included in Attachment 1.
The data from the ER transects were used to select the locations and screen
intervals for two new multi-purpose monitor wells B1a and B3a, which were used for
the tracer injections. Well construction logs are included in Attachment 2. The
tracer studies have now been completed, and have allowed ARCADIS to map
groundwater velocities within the high conductivity geologic feature.
G.1EN45MdlinckroQl(GroundvaterANC 107014 0006(IRAs at Fire Training AreaARepMs1UIC Pennrt Eeaee ae for Tracer StutlylTaetlProJed EvaIuatlon for Tracer Injections-5-10-2012- Page:
2I8
F...

• •
ARCADIS
Scope of Work
A single single -well tracer test was conducted in four ex sting monitor wells (FT-1S,
FT-2D, PP-1S, PP-3S) and two new multipurpose wells identified as B1a and 83a
(Figure 12). The purpose of this work was to define the potential groundwater
velocity (i.e., flux) within the geologic feature, as compared to wells outside of the
feature. The methodologies used to conduct this study are described below.
Background Information
The use of single -well point dilution tracer tests are becoming more common to
discern the actual flux occurring in a well and/or aquifer. Tracer testing theory has
been developed by several authors including Drost et, al. (1968), Gaspar and
Oncescu (1972), Grisak et al. (1977), and Hall (1993). The methodology generally
includes the injection of a tracer compound into a well or borehole, and then
observing the subsequent decline of tracer concentration in the well over time.
Single -well tracer tests directly measure groundwater flux through a well: and
therefore, are generally considered a reliable technique to understand aquifer
characteristics and solute transport parameters. The observed flux (q,,,,) in the
monitoring wells can be determined by:
qw = r * in(C-1) / (4t) (1)
where r is the well radius (i.e., effective well diameter), C is the observed normalized
tracer concentration (observed concentration divided by the initial concentration), and
t is the time since the initial tracer injection. Based on the qw value and the well
construction, the flux of the formation (qa) can be calculated by:
q„=qw/a (2)
The a term is a complex function of the well's construction, which represents the flow
focusing effect of the borehole, as follows:
Aquifer Protection
Section — UIC
Program
June 11,2012
G.1EMhMallinekrodt{GroundalleIVIC 107014.0006 (fRMs M Rre Training Areaj4Rapataii C Permit Evaluation for Tracer StudylText'Projed Evaluation tor Tracer Injections - 5-10-2012 -
Final r,nf.4vs
Page
3/8

•
ARCADIS
Aquifer Protection
Section - UIC
Program
June 11, 2012
S
• ,C _
2
7
K3 r1 KZ r1 K31 r1 r,�1 + 1 + +— 1- + 1 --- - + � K2 + - -
r2
K, rr K1 r, Kz 1 13 r3 Kl j.r3 r3
t
(3)
The terms r,, r2, and r3 represent radii of the inner well, outer well, and the borehole,
respectively. The terms K1, K2, and K3 represent the hydraulic conductivities of the
well screen, filter pack, and aquifer formation, respectively. The hydraulic
conductivity of the aquifer formation (K3)was determined based on the results of
aquifer testing presented within the Corrective Measures Status Report(ARCADIS
2011). A summary of hydraulic conductivities from that work are provided in Table 3.
Methodology
The single-well tracer tests were conducted in four wells suspected to be in the high
permeability geologic feature (PP-1S, Bla, FT-2D, and B3a) and two wells
suspected to be outside the feature(PP-3S and FT-1S). The locations of these
monitoring wells are highlighted on Figure 12. ARCADIS specified the use of
fluorescein dye because it is readily used in groundwater dye tracer studies due to its
properties:
• relatively inexpensive to purchase and to analyze;
• greenish-yellow fluorescent dye that can be seen with the naked eye;
• dissolves in water at concentrations that do not significantly change the
density of water; and
• behaves conservatively(i.e., no mass loss through reactions or partitioning
with vapor or solid phases).
On May 16, 2011, ARCADIS added the tracer to the monitor wells using practices
that ensure even mixing throughout the entire water column, without significantly
raising or lowering the static water level in the well. This was performed by lowering
a pump to the base of the well, and then pumping the water to the top of the water
column well to establish a recirculation loop. Tubing from the pump was connected
to an above-ground mix tank, which was equipped with a bulkhead fitting and ball-
valve assembly to regulate flow from the mix tank. Also, polyethylene tubing was
G:IENNMarlawkrodi(Groundyater}WC107014.0006(iRMs el Fire Trairurp lvee)lRepalslUPC Permit EvalwBon for Tracer StudylTezt1Proled Evaluation for Tracer irjediona-5-10-2012- paged
Final ppq.doci
4/8

•
ARCADIS
Aquifer Protection
Section — UIC
Program
June 11, 2012
connected to the valve assembly and then extended down the well to the top of the
water column in the well.
ARCADIS calculated the volume of the well, and then measured the actual flow rate
to attain a recirculation rate of approximately two to four well volumes. Tracer was
added throughout the first well volume to evenly distribute it through the water
column. Once the recirculation was completed. a bailer was slowly lowered into the
well and moved up and down the length of the water column to further mix the tracer.
Once the water column was mixed, a grab sample was collected, which represented
the baseline tracer concentration prior to starting the test.
ARCADIS' monitoring program consisted of collecting grab samples from the well for
tracer analyses each day, for the next 3 days; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and then in
February 2012 to determine whether fluorescein readings have returned to
background levels within the wells and/or migrated to other areas of the Site. The
tracer test monitoring program was designed to provide a representative average
tracer concentration at each well location, rather than an in-well vertical profile of the
tracer concentration. Therefore, prior to each monitoring event, a bailer was slowly
moved up and down through the water column a total of six times to gently mix the
water column, and potentially minimize the effects of stratification within the wells.
All samples were sent to Ozark Underground Laboratory, Inc. in Protem. Missouri
under chain of custody control. Fluorescein dye concentrations were determined by
a Shimadzu RF540 spectrofluorometer.
Results
The governing equations presented above were utilized to calculate the groundwater
flux in the aquifer. based on the tracer washout rates observed at each well. Table 4
summarizes the overall results from the tracer tests. Spreadsheet calculations and
graphs depicting tracer washout curves for each well are presented in Attachment 3.
Based on the results from this work, the maximum expected overall groundwater flow
rate within the feature is expected to range from 0.6 to 0.9 gallons per minute (gpm),
which is relatively low. but is still estimated to be almost an order of magnitude higher
that wells outside of the highly conductive geologic feature (e.g., 0.07 to 0.1 gpm).
Groundwater flows within this flow regime (i.e., 0.6 to 0.9 gpm) are generally
conducive to in situ remedial strategies. Therefore, ARCADIS and Mallinckrodt are
proceeding with plans to design and implement additional Interim Remedial
G.1E5DWAaY.dWoet(Grpageater5NC1D7014.0066(I06 at Fee Tiring Area(WepertSLLAC Peet Evaluator.for Tracer Study Text1Proj$0 Evaluation for Tracer iryectio.s-5-1a2Cl2• Page-
5/8
Final lie[leoce

•
ARCADES
Aquifer Protection
Section — UIC
Program
June 11, 2012
Measures testing activities at the Site. Consistent with the evaluation process
presented within the Corrective Measures Study Work Plan (ARCADIS 2007),
ARCADIS will continue to assess the status of each Solid Waste Management Unit,
leading to the development of the corrective measure alternatives specific to each
area of the Site. A primary component of this strategy will include the installation of
an in situ treatment strategy using enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD) in the
former Fire Training Area located in the downgradient portion of the Site, to control
the potential for off-site migration of COPCs in groundwater.
A background sampling event was conducted February 23. 2012 to determine if
fluorescein concentrations had returned to background levels. Results from this
sampling event are included in Table 5. The laboratory report from this event is
included in Attachment 4. Four of the six wells used in the tracer study, two within
and two outside the high conductivity geologic feature, had fluorescein
concentrations above laboratory detection limits. The fluorescein remaining in wells
may be due to either (i) stratification of fluorescein concentrations due to variations in
hydraulic conductivity across the well screen and/or(ii) lower groundwater velocities
that did not yet promote complete flushing of the tracer from the wells. Five monitor
wells not included in the previous tracer study were also tested to measure
background fluorescein concentrations; however, no peaks were detected within the
standard fluorescein emission wavelength range in these wells.
ARCADIS submitted a new, separate UIC permit application to NCDENR Aquifer
Protection Section, UIC Program on March 27, 2012 to perform in situ treatment of
the COPCs in groundwater in the area of the Site known as the former Fire Training
Area. The proposed injections will utilize a dilute molasses solution to promote ERD
and/or anaerobic biodegradation of the COPCs in groundwater. Additional tracers
(i.e., eosin and rhodamine) will be used in the injectant solution to evaluate injection
hydraulics, and the rate of degradation versus washout of the molasses within the
treatment zone. In addition, groundwater samples will be collected to further
evaluate continued reductions of the fluorescein tracer compound in monitor wells
PP-1S; Bla, PP-3S, and FT-1S concurrent with the performance monitoring program
of the in situ UIC permit.
Conclusions
ARCADIS has completed the work specified in the UIC permit application and is now
requesting NCDENR to terminate UIC Permit W10500328. All wells used in the
tracer test study will continue to be used to monitor groundwater quality for the
GlENWArdirrokrocl lGrourdwaMNC
a107014 0006{IRlfsa Fae Tramp AreapiRaporislIAC Parn9 Ewe erer lot Tracer SludylTee11Pro{ed Evaluation for Tracer Iryc eona-5-1 D-2012- Page.
6/8
Finer GP().docet

•
ARCADIS
Aquifer Protection
Section - UIC
Program
June 11, 2012
development of corrective action alternatives at the Site and therefore will not be
abandoned.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS GSM of North Carolina, Inc.
OgY\-4,1 -6PPM 0.CL-01\
Donald Malone, PE
Principal Engineer/Sr. Project Manager
Copies.
Karen Burke — Mallinckrodt LLC
Tim Roberts— Mallinckrodt LLC
Katherine O'Neal — NCDENR - HWS
GIENNMdknrkrad IGrourdvrate)WC107014 0006{IRMs at Fre Tommy Area)at. otstUIC Pormit Evaluator for Tracer SfudylTerttProject Lveruat orl for Tracer Inieotions- -10-2012- Page,
7/8
F mai real rtne,

•
ARCADIS
Aquifer Protection
Section — UIC
Program
June 11, 2012
References
ARCADIS. 2007. Corrective Measures Study Work Plan. September.
ARCADIS. 2008. Interim Remedial Measures Work Plan. November.
ARCADIS. 2010. Two-Dimensional Resistivity and Magnetic Geophysical
Investigation, Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant, Raleigh, North Carolina. July
26
ARCADIS. 2011. Corrective Measures Status Report, Mallinckrodt LLC Raleigh
Pharmaceutical Plant, October.
Drost. W., D. Klotz, A. Koch, H. Moser, F. Neumaier, and W. Rauert, 1968. Point
Dilution Methods of Investigating Ground Water Flow by Means of
Radioisotope. Water Resources Research, 4(1), 125-146.
Gaspar, E and M. Oncescu, 1972. Radioactive Tracer in Hydrology. Elsevier
Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Grisak, G.E.,W.F. Merritt, and D.W. Williams, 1977. A Fluoride Borehole Dilution
Apparatus for Groundwater Velocity Measurements. Can. Geotech J., 14,
554-561.Hall, S.H., 1993, Single Well Tracer Tests in Aquifer
Characterization. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, Spring, 118-
124.
Hail. S.H.. 1993. Single Well Tracer Tests in Aquifer Characterization. Ground
Water Monitoring and Remediation, Spring, 118-124.
GIENVIMailockroc l(Grourdaater)INC107014.0006 jIRMs at F,ra Training Araa)t a natUIC Famine Evaidation for Tracer Etudy5TexltProject Evaluation for Tracer Injections-5-10-2012• Pages
8/8

ARCADIS •
Tables

0
Table 1. Groundwater Potentiometric Surface Elevations,June 2008,
Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant,Mallinckrodt,Inc.,Raleigh,North Carolina
Well Screened Groundwater
Installation Total Depth Interval TOC elevation Depth to Water Elevation
Well ID Date (ft bls) (ft bls) (ft me!) (ft btoc) (ft msl)
FT-1S Jul-89 32.00 22 - 32 276.43 25.17 251.26
FT-1 D Aug-89 69.00 59 - 69 276,65 25.45 251.20
FT-2S Jul-89 32.00 22 - 32 278-21 24.93 253,28
FT-2D Aug-89 46.50 36 - 44 277.97 24.70 253.27
GW-1 Mar-98 32.00 22 - 32 278.64 21.20 257.44
GW-2 _ Mar-98 15.00 5 - 15 260.64 8.23 252.41
GW-4S Mar-98 20.00 10 - 20 260.93 22.30 238.63
GW-4D Mar-98 80.00 70 - 80 261.02 22.45 238.57
MA-3S Jul-89 32.00 22 - 32 278.35 16.14 262.21
MA-3D Aug-89 55.50 45.5 - 55.5 278.24 15.70 262.54
MA-4S Jul-89 32.50 22 - 32 278.75 19.70 259.05
MA-4D _ Aug-89 49.00 39 - 49 277.93 18.91 259.02
MA-5D Sep-04 47.00 37 - 47 271.22 16.89 254.33
OS-1 Sep-88 35.00 23.7 - 33.7 279.85 23.61 256.24 ,
06-2 Sep-88 37.00 21 - 31 275.60 19.60 256.00
08-4 Sep-88 32.00 21 - 31 278.13 20.97 257.16
OS-5S Sep-88 42.00 30.5 - 40.5 283.18 31.39 251.79
0S-5D Jul-89 68.10 59 - 68 282.57 31.06 251.51
OS-7S Sep-88 27.00 15 - 25 265.67 18.55 247.12
0S-70 Jul-89 51.00 40.5 - 50.5 265.86 18.79 247.07
OS-12D Sep-03 61.40 51.4 - 61.4 270.96 19.80 251.16
05-128 Sep-03 142.00 137 - 142 270.92 19.45 251.47
0S-130 Aug-04 61.50 51.5 - 61.5 268.61 19.40 249.21
OS-13B Aug-04 132.50 127.5 - 132.5 268.21 18.79 249.42
PP-1S Jul-89 26.00 16 - 26 251.61 12.56 239.05
PP-1 D Aug-89 68.00 59 - 68 251.26 12.30 238.96
PP-35 Apr-91 26.00 16 - 26 255.21 20.41 234.80
PP-30 Apr-91 76.00 66 - 76 254.75 20.93 233.82
PP-7 Nov-91 69.00 5 - 69 254.78 14.20 240.58
PP-9 Nov-91 73.50 9.5 - 73.5 251.50 18.51 232.99
PP-12 Dec-92 26.00 16 - 26 255.17 19.12 236.05
PP-13 Dec-92 16.00 6 - 16 253.73 6.72 247.01
PP-14 Dec-92 28.00 18 - 28 251.83 11.04 240.79
PP-15 May-93 117.00 _ 97 - 117 256.03 17.03 239.00
PP-17 May-93 108.00 85 - 105 253.88 5.80 248.08
PP-18D Sep-00 45.00 35 - 45 245.49 11.18 234.31
PP-190 Sep-00 63.00 53 - 63 242.56 12.51 230.05
PP-20D Sep-00 72.50 62.5 - 72.5 247.40 17.90 229.50
TP-1S Sep-88 37.00 24.2 - 34,2 278.78 24.48 254.30
TP-1D Jul-89 53.00 43 - 53 278.63 24.23 254.40
TP-2 Sep-88 32.00 18 - 28 272.05 16.32 255.73
TP-2D Mar-98 80.00 ' 70 - 80 273.20 18.31 254.89
TP-3 Jul-89 45.00 35 - 45 287.36 30.08 257.28
TP-45 Aug-89 40.00 30 - 40 288.91 30.47 258.44
TP-4D Jul-89 60.50 _ 50 - 60 288.55 29.74 258.81
TP-5D Jun-04 73.20 67.7 - 72.7 ' 290.58 32.95 257.63
WW-1S Sep-68 28.00 16.3 - 26.3 262.22 14.13 248.09
W W-1 D Aug-89 58.00 48 - 58 261.73 11.82 249.91
WW-2S Sep-88 25.00 14.5 - 24.5 248.93 16.52 232.41
WW-2D Jul-89 69.50 57.9 - 67.9 248.68 16.22 232.46
WW-75 May-92 25.00 15 - 25 _ 266-33 13.49 252.84
WW-7D May-92 81.00 70 - 80 266.03 13.32 252.71
WW-9S May-92 25.00 15 - 25 255.23 15.60 239.63
WW-9D May-92 70.00 60 - 70 _255.46 , 15.84 239.62
ft bls feet below land surface
ft msl feet above mean sea level
ft bloc feet below lop of casing
NA Not Available.
NM Not Measured,
Page 1 of 1

Page I of 6
Table 2, Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mallinckrodi,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina
3C0C2I, SampleLocatioa FT-1S Fr-ID FT-2S
Standard' Datc Sampled, 8/10989 8/202001 8271002 6r1912008 8/1/1989 8/20/2001 827/2002 923/2003 6/192008 8/1/1989 8'20'2001 9.23.2003 9 15'2004 6.19'2008
Field Parameters
Temperature NE NM 17.6 17.7 18 47 NM 38.9 18.7 18 6 18.64 NM 179 18.6 49.4 1975
pH(standard units) 6 5-8 5 5 20 S.60 5.46 6.00 6.50 4,60 4.86 4.99 5.28 6.40 6.30 6.26 5.90 6.46
Dissolved Oxygen(mg.L) NE NM 0.70 0-14 0.32 NM 0.60 0-21 0.41 0.4t NM 0-90 0.33 0.15 0.48
Specific Conductance(pS/an) NE 94 190 181 153 2.200 1.670 5,220 4,260 4.461 570 700 1,152 1,330 1,429
Turbidity(NTU) NE NM NM NM 13.5 NM NM NM NM 2.47 NM NM NM NM 1.93
ORP(mV) NE NM .63.0 2.6 -32.8 NM 1.0 -9.8 -196 -60.6 NM -94.0 -31.2 -77.A -110.9
Volatile Organics(USEPA Method 8260B)ue/E .r
Acetone 700 Nit <50 <50 <25 NE <250 5O00 <2 t' 1.400 3 i 1'- - 1 6,400 < 0
610 0
54
1 <5.0 <5.0 5.0 L. ..- :' _ 0. . S.-;,A ..- - 55 J
6
Benzene -" 17 :5
2-Butaaorc(MEK) d 2;,� NR <25 <25 =!9 NE J<120 <1,200 25 �`1.000 NR
Carbon Disulfide -00 NR <50 <5.0 <2 NR <25 <250 <1.0 200 NR <5.0 <1.0 <25 <10
Chlorobenrne 5.3 NR NR NR <1 NR Ni NR NR <100 Nit NR Nit NR <5
Chloroe[hane 2.500 NR <10 <10 <1 NR <50 c500 3.0 <100 NR <1,0 1.8 <25 9.8
Chloroform 70 <5.0 <5.0 5.0 <1 <5.0 <25 <250 <1.0 <100 <5 0 <5.0 <3 0 <25 <5
cs-1,2-Diehloroethene 70 <5,0 <5.0 <5.0 0.33 J <5.0 <25 <250 <1.0 <100 129 I <5.9 50 <50 35
1,1-Dichloroetbane 70 NR Nit Nit t NE NR NR NR <100 \i. Nit NR NR <5
<1.0 <100 i033 130 120 I 32
an 1,2-Dichloroetbe 0.38 3.0J I <5.0 <5.0
1.1 iA <25 <250I .s C _
1,1-Dichloroethene 7 4.0 J <5.0 <5.0 <I 29 <25 250 -]0 <100 36 •..
1,2-Dichlaropropanc 0.51 1.0 J 1 <5.0 <5.0 0A1 J 11 <25 <250 <1.0 <190 1.004i J 88 1,500 1,800 1 530
Ethyibenzene 550 1.0J <5.0 <5.0 <1 890 _ 70 <250 75 160 35 <5-0 310 270 270
Methylene <5 <5 -5.0 <25 250 L 5.3 I <500 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <120 <25
y NE Nit0 <25 25 <i0 NR <120 <1,200 1,100 <1.000 NR <25 39 <250 50 J
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone(MIBK) 100 NE NR NR <1 NR Nit Nit NR <100 NR NR NR Nit 11
� NE NR NR
Styrene
Terrachloroethtne QJ <5 <5.0 <5.0 <] <5.0 <25 250 <1.9 <100 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <25 <
Toluene 1.000 1.0 J <5.0 <50 <1 1,000 780 890 970 I 9,100 66 <5.0 340 170 360
trans-I.2-Dichloroclhcne 100 NR NR NR <11 NR NitNR Nit NR NR i 00 NR NE NR NR 2.4 J
1.1.2-Triehioroethane NE NR NR NR NR NE NR NE <5
Triehioroethene 2.8 11 I 5.0 <5.0 <1 `_5 -. ._ <25 250 -1.0 "I00 5 I <5.0 <1.0 25 <5
Xylenes(Total) 530 6 <10 <10 <2 �.._ �..�; 340 <500 280 I 680 260 10 L 71P° I 650 1.200
Semi-Volatile Organics(USEPA Method 8270(1 u4r1_
e NE <10 =20 <20 NA 3,800 8,900 10,000 3,600 15,000 <10 20 49 78 NA
BAu{chloroisopropyl)ether NE NR NE NR NA NR Nit NB NR <190 Nit Nit NR Nit NA
NE Nit NR Nit NA
4-Chlaroaoiline NE NE NR NR NA NR NR NR NR
<10 <10 <940 NR <10 <10 31 NA
2.Methyl henol ienc NE NR N<10 NR NA NR
NE° NR NR <940 NR NR NE Nit NA
2-Methylphcnol NE NR NR NR NA NR
3&4-Methylphenol NE <10 <10 NA NR <100 42 35 <940 NR <10 <10 <10 NA
;S U�3t, NA
2-Nitroaniline NE NR <50 <50 NA Nit <500 <50 <50 <4,700 NR <50 <50 <50
Nitrobenzene NE <2 <10 <10 NA <2 <100 <10 <10 <940 <2 <10 <10 <10 NA
2-Nitro phenol NE NR NR NR NA NR NR NR NR <940 NR NR NR NR NA
Phenol ;60 NR <10 <10 NA NR <100 <10 <10 P's -jCiAllalW
NR <10 <10 <10 NA
Dissolved Gases(AM24GAX)nit
Ethane NE
NA NA NA <0025 NA NA NA NA <0.025 NA NA NA NA <0.025
Ethene ?tiE NA NA NA <0.925 NA NA NA NA 0.22 NA NA NA NA
24
Methane 'xi. NA NA NA 2,800 NA NA NA NA 3,300 NA NA NA NA 13,000
Propene
NE NA NA NA `0.050 NA NA NA NA <0.050 NA NA NA NA 370
Other Analyses incl.
Amminira(US I.CA Meth
NE NA 31 NA NA NA 1,200 NA NA N. NA 360 NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPAMedhod350.1) NE <0.1 NA 0,64 NA 4.70 NA 630 130 1i0 0.3 NA NA 0.053 NANA
Chloride 250 14 9.8 NA NA 160 38 NA NA N;, 66 41 NA NA
Iron(Total)(USEPA Method 6010B) NA NA NA 13 NA NA NA NA 410 _ NA NA NA NA 13 _
03 � 91
Iron(Dissolved)(USEPA Method 6010B) 0-3 NA .`r,-",1.- r:'',: { NA t 12 NA NA I 950 410 NA _. NA >10
"-` <.050 NA �050 NA
Nitrate-N 10 <0.1 <0.050 <0.050 NA <9.1 <.050 <0.050 0.056 NA <Q,7
Sulfate(USEPA Method 300.0) 250 10 <5.0 <5.0 93 21 100 160 150 I 860 1 ci 0 NA 16 NA NA5. 10
NE NA <1.0 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA
Total 20 NA
Total Organic Carboy NE NA 11 5.5 NA NA 1,400 770 NA NA NA 4 NA
Footnotes on last page.
G:sENV,Mallutekrodt(Groundwater),NC107014 0006(IRMs at Fire Teaming Area)`Reports`.111C Permit Evaluation for Tracer Study,Tables`Table 2. Hatoncal Data.zls

Page 2 of 6
Table 2. Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mallinckrodt,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina -
NCAC 2L FT-2D MA-3 MA-3D MA-45
Standard° 8'1:1984 8I20'2001 8282002 9/23/2003 9/152004 619t2008 8/27/2902 922+2003 620i2008 8127/2002 922+2003 6/202008 828/2002 922/2003 6120+2008
Field Parameters
Temperature NE NM 19.0 18.4 18.4 19.4 20.11 26.3 25.0 40.62 27.0 24.4 32.43 24.3 26 25.45
pH(standard twits) 6.5-8 5 6.00 5.90 6.00 628 6.00 6.35 4.2 4.36 7.28 4.3 5.07 6.63 6.39 6.27 6-20
Dissolved Oxygen(mgt) NE NM 0.30 0.25 0.37 0.09 0.37 0.10 0.27 0.14 1.06 0.57 0.24 0.10 0.20 35.01
Specific Conductance(I Slam) NE 430 700 1,042 1,163 1,540 965 7,100 5,510 18.091 11.120 2.650 2,902 1,411 2,000 5.270
Turbidity(NTU) NE NM NM NM NM NM 1.58 20 25.2 607 55 24.5 4.35 120 25.8 19.9
ORP(my) NE NM -18.0 24 -4,6 60.7 24.4 114 92.1 -211.8 92 43.9 -227 5 -44 153 -14.8
Volatile Organics(USEPA Method 8260B1 u /L
r e
Acetone 700 NR <50 NR <25 -25 <25 250 <500 <500 Q.500 <1,000 NA <5,000 <2,500 <2,500
Benzene 1 8 I [8 I NR <1.0 I 25 I 3.4 570 I 28 f 120 <100 S$ NA <500 <100 I 350
2-Butanone(MEK) 4.200 NR <25 NR <10 <10 i G <120 <200 <200 <1,000 <400 NA <2.500 <1,000 <1.000
Can Disulfide 709 NE <5.0 NR <1.0 <1.0 - <25 <20 <40 <100 <40 NA <500 <100 <200
<25 <20 <20 <100 <40 NA <500 <100 -100
NR <1.0 <1 <20 <100 <40 NA <1,000 <100 <100
Chforot>Zozrnc 50 NR Nit <1.0 <3 <50 <20 NA <25 <100 <I lHl
Chloror 2.00 NR <10 NR
Chloroffoormm 70 6.0 16 NR 7 16 0.95 J <25 <20 <20 <100 <40
cis-1,2-Dich1oroethene 70 4 <5 0 NR <1.0 <2.0 1.1 NR <40 <20 NR <80 NA NR <200 <100
1.1-➢iehloroeihane 70 NR NE NE NE NR < l NR NE `20 NR NR NA NR NR <100
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.38 3 I 25 I NR I 53 I 110 I 52 <25 <20 <20 <100 <40 NA 20 0 <40 NA 50 <100 <100
1,l-Dichloroelhone 7 -5.0 <5.0 NR <1.0 440 I 661 NR
<20<25 <20 <20 <R <40 NA NR <100 100
l,2-Dichlorepropane 0.51 62 I 52 I NR I 30 I <25 <20 <20 <100 <40 NA <500 <100 <100
Erhylbettzene 550 <5.0 <5.0 NR <1.0 9.9 0.90 J <100 <I00
Methylene Chloride 4.6 <5.0 I 5.4 I NR <5 <5 0 <5 33 I <100 <100 <500 <200 NA <500 <500 <500
Methyl Isobut Ketone(MIBK <10 10 <10 <120 <200 <200 <1,000 <400 NA <2,500 <1.000 <1,000
y } 1v0 NE <25E NR
Styrene ]UO NE NR NR NR NR <] NR <20 <20 NR <40 NA NR <100 <100
Tetrachloroethene 0,7 5 I <5.0 NR <1.0 I 25 I 2.3 <25 <20 <20 <100 <40 NA <500 <100 <100
Toluene 1,000 1 <5.0 NR 4.4 1.9 1.7 950 940 r 3,300 6,900 I 1,600 1 NA 11.000 I 7,200 I 10.000
trans-Tricb1oh edits< NIl NR NR NR NR
Np <1 NR NR <20 NE NE NA NE NR --IUL•
1.1.2-Trichloroc[hant '�;✓ TJA NR NR NR NR <] NR NR <20 Nit NR NA NR NR <IDO
Trichloroetbene 28 6 I <5.0 NR <1.0 2.7 1.1 <25 <20 <20 <100 <40 NA <500 <100 <100
Xyienes(Total) 530 I.1 <10 Nit 11 110 13 <50 <40 <40 <200 <80 NA <1,000 <200 <200
Semi-Volatile Organics f1/SEPA Method 1327QC)ug.L.
Aniline NE <10 <20 20 <20 <20 NA 86.000 32,000 86,000 5,000 64,000 00,000 31,000 24,000 52,000
Bis(chloroisopropyl)ether NE Nit NR NR NR NR NA NE NR <9,700 NR NR <19.000 NR NR <9,700
4-Chloroaniline NE NE NR NR Nit NR NA NE NR <19,000 NR NR <39,000 NR NR <19.000
Hens<blorobutadiene NE NR 31 <10 22 350 NA NR <2.000 <9,700 NR <4,000 <19.000 NR <2,000 <9.700
2-Merhylphenol NE NR NR NR NR NR NA NR NR <9,700 NR NR <19,000 NR NR <9,700
<500 <2,000 <9,700 <100 <4.000 <19,000 <4,000 <2.000 <9.700
3&4-aniline nol 35°NE35' NE <10 <105 <105 <105 NA < <49,000 <500 <20,000 <97,000 <20.000 <10,000 <49.000
2-Nitroaailine NE NR <50 <50 <50 NA <2.500 10.000
Nitrobenzene NE 130 <10 <10 <10 <10 NA 7,300 2.000 <9.700 1,900 5,400 <19,000 43,000 26,000 44,000
2-Nirrophcnol NE Nit NR NR NR NR NA NR NR NR NR <19,000 NE NR <9,700
Phenol 30; NR <10 <10 <10 <t0 NA <500 I 2400 I 6,500.1 <100 1.== ';.---,1,- : - <4.000 <2.000 11?`':"
Dissolved Gases 1AM2 GAX1 ug<L
Ethane NE NA NA NA NA NA <0.025 NE NR <0.025 NR NE NA NE NR <0.025
Edirne NE NA NA NA NA NA 0.12 NR NR 0.13 NE NR NA NE NR <0.025
Methane NE NA NA NA NA NA 11,000 NR NR 7.5 NR NR NA NR NR 7,300
Pro NE NA NA NA NA NA 0.099 NE Nit <0.050 NR NE NA NR NA <0.050
P�
Oth
A1kQ � 3.800 NA710 NA220 NA
Ahalirei[y{mg/LCaCO,) NE NA 290 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPA Method 350.1) NE ,1._111 NA NA 1.20 046 NA 1,200 4.7 1,600 190 490
930
Chloride 250 at• 34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Iron(Total)(USEPA Method 60100) 03 N N.O NA NA NA 1.0 NA NA 17 NA NA 30 NA NA I 17
Iron(Dissolved)(USEPA Method 6010B) 0 3 N I 032 I NA I 15 I >I 1.2. NA I >50 4 14 NA I 37.5 3 i NA 11.5 19 -
Nitrale N 10 n,2 <.050 NA <.05 <0.050 NA 0.29 1.6 NA <0.050 <0.050 N.0 <0.050 '0(ISC, NA
Sulfate(USEPA Method 300.0) 250 28 22 NA 19 31 39 1,300 I 700 I 3,900 160 I 1,900 I 12,000 520 I 310 I 2.200
Sulfide NE NA <1.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Organic Carbon NE NA 3 NA NA NA NA 5,900 140 NA 600 560 NA 560 340 NA
Footnotes on last page.
60ENV.Mallmckrodt({3touudwatet)/NC107014,0006(IRMs et Pine Training Area)Jtepom\UIC Permit Evaluation for Tram-Stud)<Tables/Table 2_ Historical Data.xls

Pege 3 of 6
Table 2. Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mallinckrodt,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina t
NCAC 2L MA-4D 0S-4 OS-75 OS-7D OS-13D
Standard° 8/28,2002 9,222003 620/2008 827/2002 9123/2003 6,20.2008 823.2002 9<172003 6/172008 8/26/2002 91712003 6/172008 0 1a 2<52 6/19,2008
Field Parartxters
Temperature NE 24.5 25.5 24.79 28.7 281 22.84 19.2 20.2 18.10 18 6 19.2 17.34 20.8 17.42
pH(standard writs) 6.5-8.5 6.21 6.97 6.87 621 6.22 5.22 5.93 5.77 6.36 6.34 6.45 6.33 6.64 5.82
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/1) NE 3.69 0.17 1-78 0.36 013 0.76 0.10 0.23 0.78 0.28 0.28 0.68 3.80 7.08
Specific Conductance(pS(cm) NE 1,313 2.470 2,872 767 887 5.575 611 490 464 1,497 1,924 740 165 49
Turbidity(NTU) NE 22 32.4 174 65 24 13.2 12 50 0.58 31 9.7 34.5 NM 274
ORP(mV) NE -21 53.5 96.9 -55 -45.4 55.6 210 101.6 -75-11 -60.0 .25.8 -131.1 129.3 -25.2
Volatile Oreawea(USEPA Method 8260131 ue/L
Acetone
200 <50 <620
<500 50 82 460 -50 <25 NA 50 25 <25 <25 <25
a' <5.0 37 27 48 42 NA 70 I 49 !1 <1.01
Benzene '=?�.. <10 22J <25 <IC NA <25 <10 10 <10 <10
2-Bvtanone(MFKI 4'DD <25 <250 <20D <25
Carbon Disulfide 700 <5.0 <25 <40 3.0
<1.0 <20 <5.0 <1.6 NA <5 <1 <2 <1.0 <2
Chlorobmzzme 50 <5.0 <25 <20 <5.0 <1.0 <10 <5.0 <1.0 NA <5 <1 <I <1.0 <1
Chloroethanc 2 800 <10 <25 <20 <10 <1.0 <10 <10 <1.0 NA <10 <1 e 1 <I.0 <1
<I <1.0 <1
<5.0 <25 <20 <5.0 <1.0 <10 <5.0 1.1 NA <5 <1 <1
Chloroforms-12.D 0 N <20 NR <1.0 <I <I <2.0
cis-l2-Dichloroethme 70 NR <50 <]0 NR <2.0 NA NR
I
1,I-lhchloroctlzane 70 NR NR <20 NR NR <10 NR NR NA NR NR e.1 NR <I
1,2-Dichloroethene 0.38 <5.0 <25 <20 <5.0 <1.0 <10 <5.0 I 13 1 NA 7.7 I <1 <I <1.0 <I
1.1-Dichlarocthenc 7 NR <25 <20 NR <1.0 <10 NR <1.0 NA NR <1 <I <1.0 <1
1,2-Dichloro ro ane 0.51 <5.0 <25 <20 <5.0 <1.0 <10 68 I 50 I NA 17 I 11 1 2.9 <I.0 <,
Ethylbenzene P 550 <5.0 <25 <20 <5.0 28 21 <5.0 <1.0 NA <5 31 5.9 <1.0 <I
Methylene Chloride 4.6 <5.0 <25 <100 <5.0 <5.0 <50 <5.0 5 <II <.6 <5.0 <5
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone(MIBK) NI <25 <250 <200 <25 <10 <100 <25 O <I <10 <10
<I0 NA <
Styrene 101) NR <25 <20 NR <1 II <10 NR <1.0 NA NR <1 <1.0 <I
Tetraddoranhme 0.7 <S,p <'; <20 <5.0 4.0 <10 <5.0 <1.0 NA
<5 <1 <1 <1.0 <I
190 11 <1.0 <I
Toluene
1_000 65 L 1,400 I 2,800 190 `�: `" :- .-.� 190 <1 <i NR
trans-1,2•T)isbloroeahme 1fr0 NR NR <20 NR NR <.lfl NR NR NA NR <1 NR <1
1.1,2-Trichloroethane NE NR NR <20 NR NR <10 NR <1.0 NA NR NR <i
Trichloraethene 2_.8 <5.0 <120 <20 <5.0 <1.0 <10 <5.0 <1.0 <1
Xylenes{Total) 530 <10 <50 <40 15 92 150 1S 7.0 NA <10 140 16 <2.0
Scan(-Volatile Organics(USEPA Method€2 i 0C;14c-1.
Aniline NE 760 35,000 33,000 <20 NR 6,800 <100 <200 <19 21 440 710 NA <19
Bis(chioroisopropyl)ether NE NR NR <9,700 NR NR <970 NR NR <9.7 NR NR <97 NA <9.4
4-Chloroaniline NE NR NR <19,000 NR NR <1.900 NR NR <19 NR NR <190 NR <19
Hexachiorobutadiene NE NR <2,000 9.700 NR NR <970 NR <100 <9,7 NR <100 <97 NA <9.4
2-Methytphenol NE NR NR <9,700 NR NR <970 NR NR <9.1 NR NR <97 NA <9.4
3&4-Methylphenol --2 035 s <40 <2,000 <9,700 <10 NR <970 <50 <100 I 9.0 J <20 <100 <97 NA <9.4
2-Nitroaniline ,NE <200 <10,000 <49.000 <50 NR <4.900 <250 <500 <49 <50 <500 <490 NA <47
Nitrobazzatc NE 480 2,600 <9.700 <10 NR - so430 <9.7 130 <100 <97 NA <9.4
2-NPhenol hma]
NE NR NR <9.700 NR NR -,, NR NR <9.7 NR NR <97 NR <9.4
Phenol 30C <40 �=`�- `.--I '.4900 J <10 NR I 550 J <50 <100 2.1 J <EO <100 541 NA <9.4
possohved Gases(AM20GAX)uel-
Ethane 6.1. NR NR <0.025 NE NR NA NR NR <0.025 NA NA NA ER NA
Etheoe NE NR NR 0.22 NE NR NA NR NR <0.025 NA NA NA NR NA
Methane NE NR NR 12,000 NE NR NA NR NR 9,500 NA NA NA NR NA
Propene NE NR NR <0050 NP. NR NA NR NR <0.050 NA NA NA NR NA
Other Analyses mo/1
Alkalinity(mg/L CaCO,) NE NA N.'t NA NA NA NA NA NA EA NA NA NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPA Method 35011) NE49 39u 400 130 NM NA 0.58 0-49 NA 4.5 24 NA NA NA
Chloride 250 NA \.9 NA NA NA NA NA +. NA NA NA NA NA NA
Iron(Tote()(USEPA Method 6010B) 0-3 NA NA 10 NA NA NA NA NA 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA
Iron(Dissolved)(USEPA Method 6010B) 0.3 NA I 6.0 11 NA NM NA NA I 3.0 r 0.71 NA 75 NA NA NA
Nitrate-N 10 6.8 <1 <0.050 NM NA 0.24 0.15 NA <0.050 <0.050 NA NA NA
Sulfate(USEPA Method 300.0) 250 140 I -630 I 650 <5.0 NM NA 68 64 79 92 55 NA NA NA
Sulfide NE NA NA �.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Organic Carbon NE 30 480 N., 66 NM NA 3.2 4.7 NA 12 210 NA NA NA
Footnotes on last page.
G.ENV•Mallinckrodt(Groundwater)\NC107014 0006(IRMs at Fre Training Area),Reports/UlC Permit Evaluation for Traces Study`Tables\Tabk 2- Historical Dataals

Page 4 of 6
Table 2. Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mallinckcrodt,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina _
NCAC 2L OS-13B PP-IS PP-35 PP-4D PP-9 PP-12S PP-13
Standard' 9/14/2004 6,1912008 823,2002 6/172008 823I2002 6/17/2008 823/2002 6/19/2008 826/2062 6/17/2008 917/2003 6/17/2008 8/23/2002 6,19/2008
field Parameters
Temperature NE 16.9 16.22 17.7 18.41 17.4 17.55 19.3 16.69 20.1 2460 17.9 19.21 17.6 15.63
pH(standard units) t 5.8 5 6.72 5.68 5.90 6.02 5.04 4.71 9.09 6.18 6.18 6.81 5 77 2.45 5.33 5.75
Dissolved Oxygen(rngt) N Er 4.19 6.56 0.13 076 6.22 4.83 8.70 8.16 1.37 4.51 0.24 0.64 4.30 2.20
Specific Conductance(pS/cm) NE 186.2 69 564 541 52 58 103 70 1.213 1,693 174.3 157 91 86
Turbidity(NTU) NE NM 46.6 8.9 3.94 26 1.82 250 10.3 5.7 1,000 14.0 40 3.68
ORP(mV)
NE 127.4 -18.] 175.0 -14.7 304 348.5 140 -28.3 -57.0 -46.5 123.3 264 1 338 53.0
Volatile Organics fUSEPA Method 8260A)nP/I
Acetone 700 <25 5.6 J -500 <7_, <50 <25 <50 <25 - <50 <25 - <25 5.7 J <50 <25
.B enzine I <1.0 <1 23 62 <5.0 <1 <5.0 <1 21 I 51 <LQ 0.97 J C5.0 <1
2-Butanone(MEK) 4.200 <10 <10 <25 <10 <25 <10 <25 <10 <25 <10 <10 <10 <25 <10
Carbon Disulfide 700 <1.0 <2 <S <Z <5.0 <Z <5.0
<2 <5 <2 <1,0 <2 <5.0 <2
.Chlorobenzene 50 <I.0 <1 <5 <1 <5.0 <I <5.0 r 1 <5 0.48J <1.0 <I <5.0 <1
<I <10 <1 <10 <I <L0 <I <10 <1
CLhroethane
2.800 <1.0 <1 < <1 < <5 <I 2.8 0.36J <5.0 <1
LylChloroform70 <1.0 <1 <55 <1 <5.0 <7.5 <5.0 ]
,cis-1,2-Dichtoraethene '0 <2.0 <1 NR 1.5 NR <1 NR <1 NP 22 4.5 9.2 NR <1
3.1-I3icliloroetbanc 70 NR
<1 NR <I NR <1 NR <1 NR <I NP <I NR <1
-
1,2-Dichloroethanc 038 <1.0 <1 <5 I 83 <5.0 <1 <5.0 <1 16 1 LI 18 1 36 <5.0
1,I-Dichloroet hene 7 <1.0 <1 NR 'I NR <I NR <1 NE • I _ <I.0 <I NR <I
i,24Dichloro o ne 051 <1.0 <1 28 ! 15 <5.0 <1 <5.0 <1 15 4 3.5 1,7 I <I <5.0 <I
Ethylbmzene 556 <1.0 <1 <5 0.51 2 <5.0 <1 <5.0 <1 56 43 5 <1.0 <1 <5.0 <1
Methylene Chloride 4.6 <5.0 <5 <5 .-5 <5.0 <5 <5.0 5 <5
<10 <25 <10 <25 <IO 45 <10
5
<25 <10 <10 <10 <25 <10
Methyl]sobmy]Ketone 11+'111BK) NE <10 <1 NR <1 NR <I <1.0 <I Nit <1
Styrene 100 <1.0 <1 NR <] NR
Tetrachioroethene 0.7 <1.0 <1 <5 <1 <5.0 <I <5.0 <1 <5 <I <1.0 <I <5.0 <I
c1 <5 250 <1.0 0.32J <5.0 <1
1,000 <1.0 <1 <5 it <5.0 <1 b.0 <1 NR 2.0 NR <1
Toluene <1 NR
trans-T2-Doroeshaxeeae N 100 Nit <1 NR <1 NR <1 NR <1 NR -I Ni <I Ni <I
E,1,2-TrichWroethane N£ NR <I NR
Trichloroethene 2 8 <1.0 <1 <5 <1 <5.0 <I <5.0 <1 <5 <I 1.5 2.8 <5.0 <1
Xykaes(Total) 530 <2.0 <2 <10 1.9J <10 <2 <10 <2 <10 190 13 7.7 <10 <2
$emi-Volatile Organics fUSEPA Method 8270C)oil I
Aniline NE NA <19 <200 <19 <20 NA <20 NA 76 2,600 <20 NA <20 NA
Bis(chloroisopropyl)ether NE NA <9.7 Ni <9.7 NR NA NR NA NR <190 NR NA NR NA
4-Chloroaniline NE NR <19 NR <19 NR NA NR NA NR <390 NR NA Nit NA
Hexachlorobuladiene N"E NA <9.7 NR <9.7 NR NA NR NA NR <190 <10 NA NR NA
2-Methylphenol NE NA <4.7 NR <9.7 NR NA Nit NA MR <190 NR NA NR NA
3&4-Methylphenol 35/0_035• NA <9.7 <100 <97 <10 NA <10 NA <20 <190 <10 NA <10 NA
<970 <50 NA <50 NA
2-Nobenzene
e NE NA <49 <500 <49 <50 NA `50 NA 60 <SO NA <10 NA
Nitrobenzene NF NA <9.7 1,400 2-OJ <10 NA <10 NA <10 <190
2-Nitrephenol NTE NR <97 NR <9.7 NR NA NR NA NR <190 NR NA NR NA
Phenol 300 NA <9.7 <100 0.73J e10 NA <10 NA <10 210 <10 NA <10 NA
Dissolved Gases(AM20GAX)ug/L
Ethane
NE Nit NA NA <0.025 NR NA NR <0.025 NA NA NR <0.025 NR NA
Eihene NE. NR NA NA <O.p25 NR NA NR <0.025 NA NA NR <0.025 NR NA
Methane NE NR NA NA 15,000 NR NA NR 11.1 NA NA NR 12,000 NA NA
Propene NT NR NA NA <0.050 NIt NA NR <0.050 NA NA NR <0.050 NR NA
Other Analyses PIO
Alkalinity(mg'l.CaCO,) NE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPA Method 350.1) NE NA NA <0.03 NA <0.3 NA <0.03 NA 31 NA 41.030 NA <0.3 NA
Chloride 250 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Iron(Tote!)(USEPA Method 6010B) 03 NA NA NA I.I NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Iron(Dissolved)(USEPA Method 6010B) 03 NA NA NA 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.1 NA NA NA
Nitrate-N 10 NA NA 0.056 NA 0.9 NA 2.3 NA <0.050 NA 2.0 NA 2.8 NA
Sulfate(USEPA Method 300.0) 250 NA NA 39 30 <5.0 NA <5.0 NA <5 NA <5.0 NA <5.0 NA
Sulfide NE NA NA N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Organic Carbon NE NA NA 5 NA <1.0 NA <1.0 NA 29 NA <1.0 NA <1.0 NA
Footnotes on last page.
G:1ENV,Mallinekrodr(Grounthvater)NC107014.0006(IRMs at Fire Training Area)Reports UIC Permit Evaluation for Tracer Study.Tabies Table 2. Historical Dataxls

Page 5 of 6
Table 2. Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mallinckrodt,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina
NCt,t'21 PP-14 Pp-lOIs TP-IS TP-ID TP-2D
vIn:71.0' 6'19.'2008 11/292000 3'12001 t•. I7:00,, 522,2002 9119.1003 6/19,2008 9/19.'2(103 6,19/2008 827/2/302 9,2212003 6/22/2001 6118.2008
Meld Parameters
Temperature "0 16.14 NM NM 18.69 19.9 19.1 22.80 18.9 18.22 48.6 18.2 11.2 15.15
pH(standard units) _ .. 6.13 5.90 6.20 5.56 4.70 4.72 624 6.23 3.79 5.63 6.09 6.36 6.04
Dissolved Oxygen(tart) `.0 0.49 NM NM 1.81 0.19 1.15 0.12 8.01 0.56 0.17 0.27 0.20 0.48
Specific Conductance(0Slcm) \E 246 390 362 416 800 133.5 28.681 28.600 8,391 48,100 28.300 26,400 48.936
Turbidity(N"TU) NE 2.40 NM NM 22.2 50 53.8 8.04 14.2 25.9 26 24.2 NM 35.3
ORP(mV) NE 9.6 125 25 -59.8 373 107.5 -105-3 13.6 156.8 -25 83.7 -32 14.3
Volatile Organic/(USEPA Method 8260E111.L
Acetone 700 - 25 <50 50 <25 <50 <25 q <25 12 J 4,100 I 13,000 1 12,000 21,000
Benzene 1 2.6 6.3 I 6.6 ] 2.4 <5.0 <1.0 . . LOS <1.0 L _ 1.1 <100 I00 <100 7.9 J
<10 <200 <10 <I0 600 <i,000 <1,000 1!0 J
2-Bmanane(MEK) 4.200 <10 <25 <25 70 <40 <IA) <2 100 <100 <100 <40
<1.02
Carbon Disulfide 700 <I <5 <5 <1 <5.0 <1.0 <20 <1.0 <I 100 <100 <100 20
CChlloroethane e 95 <! 1 NR
t�toroethane 2.8Ci0 <I <]0 <10 <I <10 <1.0 <20 <1.4 <1 -200 <100 <100 <-20
Chloroform 70 1 5 <5 <5 <I <5.0 <1.0 <20 <1 0 <I 160 I 12A I 140 I 130
as-],z-Dichloroettterze 70 <1 <5 0.66 J
<1 I NR <2.0 <20 <2.0 <I NR <200 <200 <20
1,1-Dichloroethane 70 • 1 NR NR <1 NR NR <20 11R <I NP. NR NR <20 _
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.38 13 17 I 14 1 <1 <5.0 '1.0 <20 <1.0 I 1.2 <100 r 100 E 110 I 58
NE 'R <I NR <1.0 <20 '1.0 .,1 NR <I DO -100 410
1,2-Dichlororzhene ...
],2-Dichlaropropane <5.0 4.0 � `:'-�'_ : <1.0 L 0.61 J <100 I 370 I 310
0.51 0.3fi.I 19 1 15 � 4.0
- < <I <5.0 <1.0 46 <1.0 1.7 <100 <160 <100 58
MEtethylene
4.650 <5 8' I 4.7 J I <5 <5.0 <5.0 <100 <5-0 5 120 I <500 <500 l 100
Meth lets Chloride
MethylYlsat 1Ketone(MIBK NE <k0 <25 <15 <10 . <25 <10 850 <10 <1G 2,800 12,000 8,600 1E.000
tY ) <20 <1.0 <1 NR <100 <100 <20
<3 NA NR <1 � NR <1.0
100 <100 <20
Styrene <1 <5,0 <LO <20 V-0 <1 <100 <1�
Toluen< roethenc .00 <I <5 <5
Toluene 1.000 <1 <5 <5 OASJ <5,0 <1G I l,100 23 4.9 330 I, 1,900 j 1.700 I 1,700
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 CI <5 <5 <1 NR NR <20 NR <I NR NR NO <7C'
< <20 NR
<I NR NR NR21
Lichloroeih<ncthaue NE <I Nit5 .5 1 NR NR <20 <1.0 <1 <104 <100 <100' ,2
?g cl <5 c5 <1 <5.0 <1.0 210 320
Ty1enen(Ti a1 <2 <10 <10 1.1 J <10 <2.0 240 1.9 J 6.3 <200 230
Xy]mes(Total) 530
Senn-Volatile Organics(USEPA Method 8270C1 va:-I.
Aniline NE <20 <20 <20 <19 <20 <20 NA 20 11 J 55 2,400 4,200 15,000
Bis(chloroisopropyl)ether NE <10 NR NR <9.7 NR NR NA NR <9,4 NO NR 1,200 <IA00
0
4-Chloroandine NE <20 NR NR <19 NR NR NA NR <19 NR NR NR
Hexachkorobutadienc NE <10 NR NR <9.7 NR <10 YPhNA NR <9.4 NR NR <<2250 <970
2-Meth 1 enol NE <10 NR NR <9.7 NR NR
3&4Methylphcnal 3 '0035* <10 <]0 <10 <97 <10 <10 NA <14 <9.4 <10 Q00 Q54
2-Nitroaniline NE <51 NR NR <49 <50 <50 NA 50 7.6J <50 <1,000 <1,200 <4,900
Nitrobenzene NE 50 200 640 14 <10 <I 0 NA <10 2.7.1 <10 <200 <250 <970
2 <10 NR NR <9.7 NR NR NA NR 6.1 J NR NR NR
Phenol <
tropheaol NE;ixi <i0 <10 <10 <9.7 <10 <10 NA <10 20 110 200 <250 f 1,300
Dissolved Gases(AM200AX)taRTI.
Ethane NE NA NA NA <0.025 NR NR <0.025 OR <0.025 NR NR NR 0.039
Ethene NE NA NA NA 0.032 NR NR 0.31 NR <0.025 NR NR NR 23
Methane NE NA NA NA 1,700 NR NR 330 NR 5.1 NR NR NR 110
Propene
h'E NA NA NA <0.050 NR NR 0.21 NR <0.050 NR NR NR 2.7
Other Analyses me:l,
Alkal6sity(mg1L CaCO3) NE NA 110 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPA Method 350.1) NE NA 0.436 NA NA 25 28 4,400 1.800 1,000 4,700 5,500 NA 8300
Chloride250 NA 29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA
Iron(Total)
( otal)(USEPA Method 60108) 03 NA �z NA 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7
40
Iron(Dissolved)(USEPA Method 6010B) 0,3 NA 1.2 I NA 1.7 NA 0.10 NA NA NA NA I >50 1 NA 710
Nitrate-N 10 NA 0.21 NA NA 58 59 I NA 18 NA 1.1 <0.050 NA NA
Sulfate{USEPA Method 300.0) 250 NA 27 NA 53 300 170 NA 8.500 NA 46,000 I 26,000 I NA I 42,000
Sulfide NE NA <10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Organic Carbon NE NA 2.5 NA NA 1.2 1.7 NA 22 NA 1211 360 NA NA
Footnotes on last page.
Gi;\ENV1MaUmckrodt{Groundtsater)5NC107014.0006(IRMs at Fire Tra®g Area)Reports UIC Permit Evaluation for Tracer Study Tabies-Tabk 2. Historical Data.xls

Page 6 or6
Table 2. Historical Groundwater Data,Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant
Mal linckrodt,Inc.Raleigh,North Carolina
NCAC 2L TP3 TP-SD W1E-I S W W-I D WW-7D
Standard' 8r2712002 9/23/2003 6+182006 6.22'2004 6�18(200R N'29+29D2 9�19+2003 611RI2008 8r7812002 9r192003 6182001 8R9Q002 9t192003 6,1912008
Field Parameters
Temperature NE - 18.4 20.1 21.85 19 9 20.02 18.6 19.5 19,61 20.1 20.1 17.81 19.9 19.3 19.07
pH(standard units) 6 5-5 5 5.79 6.09 6.31 7.40 5.79 5.98 6.09 6.41 6.94 7.09 749 6.99 6.95 7,11
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L) NE 6.89 2.91 0.85 0.1 0.28 0.23 0.29 0.24 0.13 0.23 0.56 0.09 0-25 0.17
Specific Conductance(pStcm) NE 670 537 634 13,460 20,049 4,210 3,530 5,063 9,320 9,530 5.574 6.63 5,040 4,587
Turbidity.(NTU) NE 15 5.38 9.2 NM 4 1000 550 31.2 29.3 50 50.5 19.6 75 83.4 40.2
ORP(mV) NE -228 13.8 -28,6 -131.9 485.9 -65 23.6 -115.5 -123 -36.8 -223.8 -103 15.8 -120.7
Volatile Organics fUSEPA Method 8260B1 u$!L
Acetone 7G0 <100 <25 25 240,000 180,000 <50 <100 6.63 <500 '25 <25 <500 <500 1_1,
Beene 1 <10 <1.0 I 3.5 -s<( 1.200 75 i 84 I 25 85 I 130 I 29 <50 I 28 I 30
2-Butanonc WOK) 4.200 <50 <10 =i0 <5,000 <10,000 <25 <40 <10 <250 41 <10 <250 <200 ..50
( <2 <500 <2,000 <5.0 <4.0 <2 <50 <10 1.5 J <50 <20 <10
700 <10 <1.0
Carbon enuene 5D <10 34 31 <500 <1,000 <5.0 <4.0 <1 <50 <1.0 <1 <50 <20 <5
Chlorocthanee
Chlaroethane 2.800 <20 7.9 15 <500 <1,000 <10 <4.0 <1 <100 <1.0 <I <100 <20 <S
Chloroform 70 <10 <1.0 <1 <500 <1,000 <5 0 <4.0 <1 <50 <1.0 <1 <50 <20 <5
cis-1chloroethene 70 NE 2.8 1.5 <1.000 <1,000 NR NR <1 NR NR <I NR N E <5
I,i-DDiehl ichloroethaac "0 NR NR 0.52J NE
1,2-Dichlorocthane 03A 200 j 480 I 1,100 470 3 _I <1,000 <5.0 <4.0 <1 <50 <1.0 <1 <50 <20 <5
1,1-Dichloroethene 7 NR <1.0 ' 1 5;1' 1,000 NR <4-0 <1 NE <1.0 <I NR <20 <5
1,2-Dichloropropanc 0.51 250 1 130 r 230 760 450J <5.0 <4.0 <1 <50 <1.0 I <50 <20 <5
Methylene
ene
550 33 1.7 0.82 J 3,100 2,500 20 38 4,9 110 ISO 58 380 340 340
Mcehy]meChSoride 4.6 <10 <5.0 <5 <2.500 <�5,0(Nl <5.0 <20
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone(MIBK) NE <50 <10 <10 9,600 10.000 <25 <40 <10 <50 20 <10 <250 200 <50
Styrene 100 NR <1.0 .. I <500 - 1.014 NR <4.0 <1 NR <1.0 <1 NR <20 <5
Tetrachloroethene 0-7 <10 I 1.7 I 2.9 <500 1.0(5 <5-0 <4.0 <1 <50 <1.0 <1 <50 <20 <5
Toluene I.000 <10 I i' 1 15,000 I 9,800 _ 38 140 0.66 J 1,200 I 1,800 J 28 iiiiM 1,000 32
trans-1,2-Dichleroethene 100 NR NE 1.1 NR <1.000 NR MR <1 NE NR <1 NR NE <5
1,12-Triobloroethane NE I NE NR <I NR <1,000 NE NR <1 NR NR <1 NR NR <5
Trichlorocthene 2.8 1 <10 I 6.4 I 3.9 <500 <1.000 _ <5.0 <40 <1 <50 <I.e <1 <50 <20 <5
Xylenes(Total) 550 29 5.8 2.3 16,000 1 11.000 320 420 84 470 I 640 1 250 1,600 # 1.400 I 1,400
'emi-Volatile Organics(USFPA Method 8270C)ue_I. !1
Aniline NE Tf <20 <20 NA 62,000 64,000 670 9,200 140 130,000 130,000 79,000 7,200 32,000 27,000
Bis)ch(oroisopropyl)ether NE NR NE NA <4,000 <4,900 NR NR <10 NR NR <4,700 NR NR <2,000
4-Chloroanilnie NE NR NR NA NR <9,700 NR NR 8.8J NR NR <9,400 NR NR <4,100
Hexachlorobutadicnc NE NR <70 NA <4,000 <4,900 NR <1,000 <10 NR <10,000 <4,700 NE <5,000 <2.000
2-Me[hvlphertol NE MR NR NA 4203 <4,900 NE NR
<10 NR NR <4.700 NR NE <2.000
3&4-Methylphenel 35:0.035< <10 <10 NA <4.000 <4,900 <10 <1,000 <10 <10 <10,000 <4,700 <400 <5.000 <2,000
2-Nirroanilinc NE <10 <100
<52 <50 <50,000 <24.000 <2.000 <25,000 <10,000
Nitrobenzene NE <50 <50NA NA <ta,000 <2000 <4,.000 <50 900 <10 <1,000 <IO<5.000 <10 <10.000 <4.700 <400 <5.000 <2.000
2-Nitropherwl I NE NE NE NA NE <4,900 NR NE <10 MR NE <4,700 NR NR <2,000
Phenol 500 <10 <10 NA . <4.000 <''.r 6
_ <10 <1,000 14 <10 I 11,000 ' ,2 I ' - 1
Dissolved GasesfAM20GAX1 ue'1.
Ethane N'E NR NR <0.025 NR 0.06 NR NR 0.045 NR NR 0.13 NR NR NA
Ethene NE NR NE 0.43 NR 4.1 NR NR 0.076 NR NR <0.025 NR NE NA
Methane NE NR NR 900 NR 1,600 NE NR 3,400 NE NR 24,000 NR Nit NA
Propene <SE NR NR 0.084 NR 5.7 NR MR <0.050 NE NR <0.050 NR NR NA
Other Analyses mg'i 1
Alkalinity(m81L CaC:O,) NE NA NA NA NA `•5. 'A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ammonia(USEPA Method 350.1) NE 7.6 8.7 II 2,400 2.u05 200 310 220 560 1,500 340 600 420 390
Chloride 250 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 450 1 NA NA
Iron(Total)(USEPA Method 6010B) 03 NA NA 47 NA 32 NA NA 32 _ NA NA 2.3 NA NA NA
Iron(Dissolved)(USFPA Method 6010B) 0.3 NA I 60 42 NA 0.6 NA r >'50 23 NA I 7.5 0.54 5.8 1 7.5 I NA
Nitrate-14 10 <0.050 <0.050 NA 1.7 5A <0.050 <0,050 NA <0.050 <0.050 NA •0.050 <0.050 NA
Sulfate(USFPA Method 300-0) 250 52 52 89 4,300 I 6.800 <5.0 <5.0 10 1,500 I 4,000 I 250 '5.0 <5.0 NA
Sulfide NE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Organic Carbon NE I 3.7 2,5 NA 790 NA 95 110 NA 380 550 NA 270 200 NA
Footnotes on lest page.
G:+ENVsMaltinclvorh(Grotmdwater)1NC107014.0006(IRMa as Fire Training Area)'RcportsUIC Permit Evaluattsu for Tracer StudyTables'Table 2. Historical Datazls

Page 1 of 1
Table 3. Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Slug and Recovery Tests
Mallinckrodt LLC, Raleigh, North Carolina
Well ID Test Method Hydraulic Conductivity
(feet/day)
Wells within the Highly Conductive Geologic Feature
B1a Slug Test 3.0
B3a Slug Test 0.05 '
FT-2D Slug Test 5.4
OS-7D Slug Test 8.6
OS-7S Slug Test 5.9
PP-1S Slug Test 3.2
PP-82 Recovery Test3 6.2
PP-8 Recovery Test4 7.0
Wells outside of the Highly Conductive Geologic Feature
FT-1 S Slug Test NM5
PP-3S Slug Test 8.66
PP-4D Slug Test 0.91
PP-4S Slug Test• 0.86
Notes:
! 4 1. Hydraulic conductivity estimate is relatively low,compared to other wells within the feature.
2. PP-8 is an active recovery well that had a well seal and hard pipe plumbing,with wires. -
Therefore,slug could not be inserted into the well. •
3. Determined by Bouwer and Rice rising-head test(1976).
4. Determined by the Theis(1935)nonequalibrium pump test method.
5. Well FT-1S had a bent casing,and slug could not be inserted into well.
6. Hydraulic conductivity estimate is relatively high,compared to other wells outside of the feature,possibly
because another parallel geologic feature is present at this well location.
I I
i f
I ,
f

i
Page 1 of 1
Table 4. Results from Tracer Wash-out Tests and Potential Flow Rates in Feature,
Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Raleigh, North Carolina
Well
Screen Estimated Flux in Effective Area of Groundwater Flow
Well Interval Aquifer(ft3/ft2-day) Feature(ft2)1 Rate in Feature (gpm)
(ft bls) min max min max min max
Tracer Wells in Feature
PP-1S 16-26 0.028 0.028 4,125 6,375 0.60 0.93
B1 a 35-45 0.0003 0.0031 4,125 6,375 0.0064 0.10
FT-20 36-44 0.0018 0.0018 4,125 6,375 0.040 0.06
B3a 40 -50 0.0004 0.0008 4,125 6,375 0.0086 0.027
Max range: 0.6 0.9
Wells Outside of Feature
PP-35 16-26 0.0034 0.0034 4,125 6,375 0.07 0.11
FT-1S 22-32 0.0001 0.0003 4,125 6,375 0.0021 0.0099
Max range: 0.07 0.1
Note 1: Area,na,=55 ft wide by 75 ft deep
Area,,,,,= 85 ft wide by 75 ft deep

Table 5. Results from Background Fluoroscein Sampling Event on February 23,2012
Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant, Mallinckrodt,LLC,Raleigh,North Carolina
Peak
Well Well Screen Interval Wavelength Concentration
(ft bls) (nm) (ppb)
Tracer Wells in Feature
PP-1 S 16-26 508.4 8.53
B1aS 35-45 508.5 28.6
FT-2D 36-44 ND <0.002
B3aD 40-50 ND <0.002
Wells Outside of Feature
PP-3S 16-26 509.4 3.58
FT-1 S 22-32 508.5 266
Monitor Wells to Measure Background
0S-3 24.4-34.4 512.28 0.094 J estimated value
OS-12D 51.4-61.4 ND <0.002
I OS-12B 137-142 ND <0.002
PP-18D 35-45 ND <0.002
PP-20D 62.5-72.5 ND <0.002
a: Peak waviength and its location does not meet all QA/QC criteria for this dye. Therefore,
an estimated value is provided.

ARCADIS
Figures
G:IENNMaainckrodi(GraurztwaterJ NC107014.0006 f IRMs al Fire Traorng Are0ReportsVUIC Permit Evaluation for Tracer Si Tex Projeca Evaluation for Tracer
Iniarlinns.5.1/).7(112.Fires/irIl r

y__) -;-..- A.,__s,_.\1_,-;. ,; ..,(_,,,,,„\. 11K,...._.-___-",y)01 (. 1.P i -\ . - uW"., Nly-71
..... _ )1AN;-vin.e—rt-,,,_)N.,..-1S .'
---z" -\, c.- ) ' -1P‘\,. I Niiii- j-•. --- r'-'1--\ I- 2001 ; I 1\ kl":4;1V1P1/111"'I ''/ ' '
; --ci; 7 ), i ii0D ..., .9 . .. ,,...../ ..-L--i 4_ :.!A.Viti,........dith are 111.2,k.,k ...x.A1-._ ,... A.,. _
1,'S. V....__,, - • . - \ AralikidiV
E.. -,±.-----2,5--',-.p-=-,•,,i,,,:,-e---,,,i-,,, ,--.„.--.'-.7...--'\/7../...__',f..-.._-,Il l
1.._._,_,,__-...;.-...„..„:-;;":......I,,„_"..,
--_--*1
041,.,1:14„.'.-.I7h1 nt,
};- -. �)1 n ,yam }-,_ . /' \•
„•,-.
-'
_ . , , / 7
„ ,, ue/
, , /;-,- '5_ --) dr) )4( (1, --' flet'. --4,. L},0 /
..tc
./. ,,,._A
..,.
e �. J l 11,, 1 �.. - ,rew
. * T jVLl. a�/ �� '"tip
- /`sue C r.�.` , :'r> ,
-ter- -= �� /� l
SITE ( •
_'"` -+ LOCATION -� ►'-+r - / - "-�
i1# 1 ' I � f•- ' -�T '1 1 se it
D f -
'...) ji..f ' '
4 0 '
._
g ,N4•.... ,----- -1'.. ' , \AL._ r ) itil . _
m .
p ,. '�` �� , , ! r ,. 1 _,1 l( pair ,�
0 ge," ,....,..:..., .0 11.
' �� �,_ J/ f r * _ - ■ ', -} tea,
C7 �.. I 'r'^,' _ ■ , i �/ a r- set 15 $`des
will `
'`\ ('''., \'-li r IF If A • ±1 ) 11--)) tA 4 j, so
•
•ram �, , ..•�, `J/'� - /i l •�Lor , l ■' �- YJ L�
•
,,,, ,
o . ate- ;J ,^ 11�. 1..; �} e• -�' • •s = `r '1}' rn • :,,, - _ r t-'?I512V;q: `,-A.i--a-l-Ca-HP7 P1,/---c)l.--Vi-))ff,11_:-.•\-,7...) Th,,i,-..-.?',\.,,,,,..,If''
-i5,.
J _max
i • 2'I \''•---i'"114.711',..r---- jj- Nk----\,. ii Jo;
°.:1a
I�C „— '-„-/-V;i,.t,,.v',T„,4...,./,:,••1",-•,i
r,N ram" l �`,e-.i.—,
._ t -_
.r..).c:----/•,..,..1) -,.k,-..e Il)i-.
_N.ik
5 _
i f r0i-.---)_--
_4_.14v2•1'1
1..e l.„'1 i.\-\,'....O._.
/ J�y �i�i11 1 ,, , , �� -- a\ !p� lF
0 1 r_, / 1/ .. i." 0„ J 1, 11 4 , ' i
f, I. . F ) r�
/ i ._.,
llr/ ' lw
'‘,4410711W - 1 i
- _- 4 s - \ ►' r Isf__ -'\ )L am,
' ; \ ,.4 -i / , :','t- lit
' -.... -- \--)04. /--- / /.45it, 111%)111:.„Ire-ilill,r4 \ _
—Alit - 't 1 I„ f:re f , i :L.:a -*— ,. ' 'G
i x ¢�`� - - - ,•,+•. ,1. ,., -,. .r. ��++� `till+ .�. •. . 1,
ki
�' __ rj/ \1 'r ■ + �,_ .rF-F ,,yam _
9 ahR a_-"'G ..■ 4 - Ii-1 :� �i��� a�� 1�, ..}F._.. f 'r —`r'�ti •` r\ /�
7 s 1 \ MALLINCKRODT, INC
ri i . County RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
g S Location RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
YI UIC PERMIT
me a 1/2 1 IJILE
s
[--I I—{ 1-1 E I [—I SITE
8 sc 1000 0 1000 2000 3009 4000 LOCATION
1 HHF-1 I 1 l 1
s FIGURE
SCALE1:24000 ARCADIS
.Ti Contour Interval 10-foot Datum is Mepn Sea Leve U.5.G.5. 1
7.5 Minute Series Wake Forest, North Carolina Topographic Quadrangle.

I e / / / - �� \��\\ \\\ L
I NOISE
If
\`
i ./ ''....•1. GAF-2
4 Clwlol M4 Goff Ca,M 4
•LPG-PZ S/ /`` I/ •\
. ///\\
m \zD. b1R. b1R. S-7 LC AubmnetWR•LLC Propwl / \ // \\
27
pp.�`g PP-T2° �g a T �,., > MLC AWatlwllw,LLC Property /
\�3-1s P-1 % \ /// \\
S PP. • ,: NIP s D /. \\
V.
E-IY (�p.DRGPSfi -29
/ ^` I/ / \• (iAT� /
C1 /' " °FIGP30e / =..„0;1 { •1 SYORAGE
eJ ' p 1 piGP Z1 pACd 11 -.11 \ 4 •�•.� - ,1.
6 ORC>pZ CFfiP-Tae.•79 a 6, d
pp AR A3R1[i�P.V B ➢MG1qP-T �IXtCP-6 `•PP-13 11GU]U'
V \MLC Aula„pt1'�,LL PrwR.Yr'P//� -T18 GP-N Boncrzlucr-1 °aGPs •°8-0 "• �� -•_= TANKS r ` `�` •---,•�• 1
lii
PP-21n -zte�°AGPTs ap dgM dR oAGP� /p PP �l-l.s,� �,. MA3°t- 34 11E II 7•' 'y _ ^'�•
_ ANFF2-,
GP-,R ORGP-10 °cP- p°RQ PP-t° 'PPB '�+ �1--MTOR➢(aEN I _,[ '4 \
CI `�� `\� °NGPTp� �oaOP-ze OfWp.ta PP.tw �- Qg7o 7ANK5 `fir,S.J �_1'4 l TP,an `~ "`'s lt, \ OW4W1
Z8 .Sw w.wmv A,+e GAGP3 PP/1 r'P-6 °62 J i=_ •\�L,1� .)S NF-P2s p GW.:,
SW-6 nRAp-1e ,s9 �d�9ri / l 8 l.-._.� c rat rs. 1 �� [ w� u`wgw-tom
PP-1 9 9 — ....
., 1,r, Qpf ila I P L� I; a; )I® •\ y�� \\
PP-,�° }�pm.cw., z %op,_,, ! 1 1---6 i;_ter I�' y,+, TP:s°o if Pae swxL \��r a•Ii'. cw rva\\ \`\
°AGP-te"^ •1 f`�1 ,11 l rn�s No8.D1Nc 1� Gwss-z`Z....-
. \
'" % I MEDICAL ' 11f nA MIL -g _ ' ■ 4la ma) pp�}01l\ \• �Gww \ \
30 I PLANTIMACINGFT-�D Y f�... Au !f LET,..� ,:, ;4 •-s�:_�lf ,`/' uw-0S - �� \
Vacant M�inelv°tl1 PrpprtY PP 9m `PPJO ! PLANT •4tl'i- _" _ •T ii"g.91 _ i 1 �:--� \''® �NF72 \\
' / p� I r - � wfw� u4r \[J I��7 IYASi 1, A \ �0a \\
)L' 4in _. _ \ pp����
I ( �� 51A DT ° Tw.ta • /� NF.Pyt GW-1° \ -...^VY
/
b r'`` % %/ I II. WAR41M= OS A.' ., 1 w — if (wNa �\ 1'
us \ ' 4 _-- 1 &.�� �R���- 1 T'D, �.ii _",� `S -1D rlFsza• �� _ AF{1�r
I I I •I I ' I■+■*`•�. y�� � �-- I y���N R6-1 B0 ibd "CS-
fT1IS1 p �l �`
YeetnF Md4lnekrRM PfpparL / / •°8-„ 1.- f - I I I / lif
�m lam+-; �w,Y-i wATiR Pdl° , � 0.Ow-tm �I �11
•
a \ c FRACERTESTING AREA _-__---- f .. �.u1 ., -----j.t ME.z+z7 .: f
I •` -. , -If-r• Tw-It •ww-si 'awl°,_ 1➢s t- I 14
! /� `�.__.�.—. _r�,_�, / �/' F---.-.-. 1l ''�gr�r• �'"m"'it Sri iv:* �_� •�N if li
\ Ill I 4 { I I 1 aA-W .. �.�.Pz�aoS,[p)°w�N-7°t}AP' ±p �.s i -� / ANF�2-s
y `` t 190 I tet Y i . . ` - 14 1
- Il ' r"_� , [,I I I I s.�y + sEt ` 2➢`IC ? ���� wW-zs 'EfAa
_ lI a-7 os-1 \ ___ t r LkL
wAm rLa Map e y\`r,.{ "`---333 e1 -15 "' 1\
• _ l 'f5' P-/5 NMI-1R
-I I �,y - ! i�� "-- [ueweE1,er wanE1Z ]t+w" °® { ':, \��
� �� y�ea
0 f E7 r----$ {�-..-- [WIPYEN, 1YCNf-'M'-19� -�� /
K r` m�46 war, f µ� 1 PZa 1 Q -p
-� I _ P254W-t __ �Z�•� �TW{ ��
to- •
1 / .—• __._.—.—.__.—. TNc�•B,N's eTwa Brm.,Q _-����� .
/-- - TWA._. ,Y°p ;TWe -- 1 `�
* -,,
RE
If
LEGEND
>-
Ell BUILDIIG VITN PLANT
DESIEtED aa°rG MM9ER
CL
SURFACE WATER BODY
CREEK/STREAM
J Mq STQiiCAI FEATURES
d �//\\
ml FENCE LINE
h -1--T.- RAILROAD �l /
—E— ELECTRIC LINES G
!7 ___-__ PAVED ROAD
6
LIPAVED ROAD
M ® UTILITY TwER MALLiNCKR00T, INC.
BEDROCK MMIMIORIMG ALL
a • c9s-sa FT au)
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
4 S SNALLw MouT1xING WELL
w Q ua-,s FT BLS)
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
s oWEB 0.113aTORING;+Eu - 111C PERMIT
W o W e GRQANIVATER RECOVERY YELL
c •• $WLLLOV DRIVEN TEMPORARY VELL f
CCp a A pLE2p1ETER SITE LAYOUT
u
X ABANDONED SNALLOW NOMATOR WELL WITH MONITORING WELLS
rn
ETTVtLL
FIGURE
i}s'' �((, SURFACE AR cAD i s
SCALE IN FEET
w_

\ \\
1 Ji /7 .,,,,,,,.
i \
Cheviot ME God Cowie \ /
/ i \ �
S 2T SS Y / \
R \�. S T9•• PC-PZ-2 S 7 S-0 < tC Patan ve,ILC Pmpelq / +� / \\
PP • �� •S-7 ram..' Pcrza P' '-> sac Aualll�s,LLD AVM). // \ // \\\
PP-zm •sTs a a
i T.,,./
IS
o 11 SA\�
SrialtAGE
•
\ EARN
/'' A L�-T7 _ ` +•� �GW-TB GW� 1.•
•
;j PP-215 .�/ IfiPP-T3 \ GW-1 ERG1_ •'ate` .70
1
' ALC I�urmoaw, Prnatdy /Q Ci / PP- TANKS , r 1 _ ._'� ti \
\ PP-sTo l+S`PP-2Te PPS Q 28 MA 6n �„ i ® I Tee •Nr az-T
��. Q PP-Tn /PPS i" 7D PRCOUCTS
,mil_ !TANKS
�`� �� PP-T� /PP-,b 0� � oars s,`r jy�' i i = ®�� V- ��:'��•• •
l 66PPs 49EN
Ilk
`, : ._yA 1 t _ �� ;7P•z
7114 -
d P Pra �-/,i -�L. _ __ g{ m ,+r ' 11' 1 •I' _ /C aBur
PP-I2 Q S� P O to �I I Q p.6 i 1:Amp, — w \
�a PP-Tao--0 $Q�1 •PPTS / 1 --�®I� i` �•+ �:.D III ' �1 - j®
,�" �p/pig // I 1\ 1.' � � �°-�'11 . I lrf \jp-4b� 47�,. �, ,' �\
I vocal Yti�odl Prop AeT / I Pr-T`n®1 Pr; +'7 �Op �' to \
- /- / ! J I �� � � �i~nw''ram _�+A+ a
W ,5 ,�..., . CAM�0
/ ,:. L.� .� _--, S,AAdT '::�:... y •. C� <d NP�Z•3
ci
Former
- - - 1 -— ? mot w T e.a.PmeMAIN
Vimt6YlsKrinteRepeat / /` •OaT, �Iw I I ! t l \342��y ) 1 _ l T�we�aai
4 `/ �.� oa,2H3 \ Tm—.—� ---/ / �.1.,, q if , 10,350�Y o I `�y�y-is_ - -� �yyr,\\ Toys
4.
// ��� --�- - oW-rao 111\ w S I mom. "rlr I I Entinta
1 wz,� Pza~-\ . is: & sAar ' 1 i 80 k)'s[s2- %
_ _' i I > __.... WASTE Pno �uQ P-o ice) I Q� - (
,!'-( OaT \.�;— 6 I `,ems PZ-09-4AVS"S
�a 21)
�` � -Ir_ ` 6 1 I - • l�1 �l^^� /_ -Y ", �J • EWRGENCY
- /////'fy®Jjy�y�
"� ,, WSW.T IIS d 19 ©Pza
`� u J
o --- L - I �Pza'
10c Oa
,,./ SYIti6117/ ______________ - - -
`P� LEGEND
i g • BEDROCK MONITORING WELL (55 - 530 FT BLS)
Q SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (13 - 45 FT BLS) , r
® DEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - 10O FT BLS) '
e GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL MALLINCKRODT,CAL
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
a • SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL RAL€IGH,NORTH CAROLINA
o 2 • PIEZUMETER
/ UTILITY TOWER UiC PERMIT
o v —E— ELECTRIC LINES
_ FENCE LINE
Total BTEX Concentrations
Q j I I I I RAILROAD
c w 1,BE6 JOKE 2008 TOTAL BTEX CONCENTRATION, pg/L
in Shallow Groundwater
—
.� ii: 49 2003/2004 TOTAL BTEX CONCENTRATION, pg/L
(Phase 11 RID
1O0 TOTAL BTEX TOLUENE,
CENTRATION CONTOUR, pg/Lal
6 2OG 400 ARCAD
1S IFIGURE
$TEX BENZENE, TOLUE,r£,ETHYLBENZENE aNp %YLENE S FEET 3

J 1
1 / -"---., 0,„
//// \
•
siamapn 5-19 -N__ 7/:"'
/
PGAZ2 &V / / '\ \\
,20• (.79. S,B 84 < M X laroreae.ILCPeepoq / y\ / \\
pp- PA-pp 4,s47 za MILC Automats*.LEG PrspaM1Y /`
N�S15 • f�T• / '\ \\
o 13 sit s+�' /P z / /PP 4s i, 4 14 _ \ /�
______ ___.
/ 40 — ,most 1( ` GATOR
_____
/' tT INN
iii \cr/Q PP-21S �� TAB —;GIM�t RGMICA�adr PeW°eb' -21D 'Z+B p PR74 111 l Former1 ~-' _,, . \ ♦NF-PZ-t
'" `, c5 �PP-10 PP-al/'a
PP-1-1-16-iiklit'll -. .4p.4iiiiirow...?._.,„„-e--- _ . <5 H'RF Ce+-J�os-Vll }� ream Arts '` ` _ ��
/.. tr...--4,..
20860
1,2
,,__ ___„.. .._
t „FL., _2., ,_,„,i_ ,
.. ......_,CM- • A
•
tAsie�N.lY,d,oa Ptcparq a . I
• 6 (
% P- � O le .7 E \ !16 I
• , © —VA---'' i . 't
SS
TP s
\
.; t �Trrs
PP: / PLAN! 10110®FT-t<*Sr - i �li3.;
! ! — __ �
Ili
40.
VI F � G = / '+I /
ML
�: I �� . - A
! ' 51NQT A
! - . MNt : 00 - 3
y / -.\ 5,
w- - '
OW-45
� / / _ /I
� I `" '
/ ` =_�� I I- ''R" te�� 7� 'I r ` !wolf-
> Pepnp •08 t1 I• I �1088 f I. s` tFrew' t' uf'wsr ' ' 1 Ytw-t '•FC,M itli .• -to
` I.
f- L � II e wt WAT3FWroNo
� Ost2B •
- +
1251 -1 :, w75- _ ww-1os +
1/ ��� osi3o rl� 1 F I I Pz4 9,80z x'� i 1 _ � w
N i^,tom <5 • ___, I � 7' w/.BTE PM Zig1 0 • 17-41'�+��I , f
g 1 ()s+3i \. s}! r I _ w PZ-5s—ww-tts Q� �m
ti. i Tom' Ts GDwe+ o
�� ' ' ' 011 ( — �I � 5� /(_I ~~�r 006;0ac' ENLYEaunk/Ese .n Q/
�r I - sync - ©_�
liThZ-i
•
5 .5••'`L — m •— os es asp
o uS -�—�-� I r -- --
e mil_Z *
4
tI D us
--x
'. LEGEND y
M • BEDROCK MONITORING WELL (95 - 530 FT BLS) rli,
Q SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (13 - 45 FT BLS) ,
® DEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - 100 FT BLS)•• GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELLfMALL INCKRODT,INC.
SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
i$
me • PIEZOMETER RALEIGH,NORTH PERMIT
r
® UTILITY TOWER
i o w E— ELECTRIC LINES
DF g .-II—X— FENCE LINE Total BTEX Concentrations
�,Fs -5--r-�� RAILROAD
p iO'1i0 .JJt4 non TOTAL BTEX CONCENTRATIONS, Ng/L in Deep Groundwater
cg - log 2003/2004 TOTAL BTEX CONCENTRATIONS, P9/L
Il (Phase II RFU
20 TOTAL BTEX TOLUENE,
ETHYL
TIONENZ CONTOUR, LEN 0 200 400 ARCADIS I FEGURE
tt
u BTEX BENZENE. TOLUENE,ETHYLBENZENE AND %YLENE
= x SCALE IN FEET 0
0.

\ 1
1
•
•
_11' i/ N
•
CtrHot Ms filar caw.. % \ V,/.....:74
st.IhmF-21 ,9: 4/ _ % \ \�i
♦ -2
\sas s_,e� ps,e-z sT <31&T ' �'/ /\\
MLC Automodee,LLC Propel '\ %PP 7 "lc NdardY�.LLC P111pMa ///
�.— r /�—`�� // \\
5f5 35f39 � /`` PPS ,./__ _ \ \
i et... „C ........
PPS i •— • = I `` QATOR
ii
ea
_ 44......, 1v P0.13 L Kl •,•"� sF • r 713 1
Mlc AutrwoB,s, PP-21s ~ �� <1k1 TAWS - SOY, , ERG '`�•�,_._
G<1112 1JlV.
��C�l_ 6 �PP-11) �$/PP-6 36 YI1454:44-, o PRODUCTS <�r 1 Fo^^sr �� — +1 ♦NF�Z-t
per_ Mro„0ae1 reFaT: �— _
w �� P�iaD - __ + \Q&7D Hvoaeoa+ _ll___- _ — i � 'a .z ��
`` ��PP-t `'?t 10—Pp.7 Ds713 l • V / - I i TP-2D r�<7f<1 �•(
rf.� /6.311 �' Pas/ 1315Q �71� l r TP2 —)v it" \ _ .ss ♦
f11W - DPI ... l —_ •�- 2411A , 1 NP pz z
/ " +•-� • ,� 1 I. . ��: SURREY
_ /pRY i _ _ _L, ire I
vP,2� C —= f� I'`r ; r C ei �i..: d I G1,11 II � Ilk .,' --� 'PGw`cS/ k \
` PP.,RD 361<1 •pP,s -., ' I.` NI-_,`/ . 1 : ;IV 1'ear' ll y, i_ P<�< // FT-tD , iFT-20 ! a-.-I I 410 W <T 14•_;-�, ) -1D .I \,
Want r $ 11 1 ! •
AFT- i""t \�
g OPP,2aD D / I •
1.1 1 -__ 's dos-a — _~ 110 — _ 1
TBY
/ ........\\ L.� ii 97 5,IWT �Iv`T ..0 u... _=+o;r 3Qr
NF-PZ.9
/ `1 1 w ? "'!. i I f \�
•
\ // TDB„ y _ I I 242.
I `——— �, '/! �. 3{ � 1 eDPu,e twi<1 Fwst, `. , Gow-,o
R. -...„..„&i.......p,...,. I 4744 I , wATet P(111D
/^ ,`.` osi2$ \ t2D—:=� — / --1 T� OQt�l,l! �ww7s �CrweD.• ���
�/ —'—k. o ,D jti `1ti ' 1 ` ' •� ' IsPU. � p7J -41°61-j � " `- _ aids
r. ` \�\- = 1 ®i I ins)- I I ,rAsrevAn RESPONSE \ pins--ww-i1I W.'. (�1VA ,
Jlr
�'�.� Jjejil....... li / (-1 "� r '�. tee ,a � f
i .1
l 08-0,st-8D
LEGENDni Ina 1-----;------------ If
/ M
Yi • BEDROCK MONITORING WELL (95 - 530 FT BLS) US
Q SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (13 - 45 FT BLS)
%{ O DEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - 106 FT BLS)
e GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
• SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL )
♦ PIEZOMETER 1
1-2 ® UTILITY TOWER MALLINCKRODT,INC
# I E— ELECTRIC LINES RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
` : —•—_— FENCE LINE J RALEIGH,IN NORTH
CAROLINA
T-1 -1 -.= RAILROAD
o r1,3I15 ,JUPE 2008 1,2-DCA I. 1,2-DCP CONCENTRATIONS, pg/L
a.U 13/5U 2P�haseb I R.U�A & L2-DCP CONCENTRATIONS. pg/L
tS10 COMBINED L2^DCA IP-DCP [SOCOHCENTRATilN'IS, pg/L 1,2-DCA and 1,2-DCP Concentrations
`s pj pp �' ISO D�NTRATIDN CONTOUR INFERRED FROM PHASE II RFI in Shallow Groundwater
tl gl I l,2-DCA 1,2-➢1CHLOROETHANE
1 1,2-DCA 1,2-➢ICHLDRPPRCPANE D 2D0 400 F IGURE
NOTE _ I\RCADIS 5
l'i u 1, NORTH CAROLINA 2L GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR 1,2-DCA IS 038 pg/L.
g t, yy 2. NORTH CAROL 2L GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR 1,2-DCP IS 0.51 pg/L. SCALE IN FIST
\ \--I S2 ,

J77 \ \
/ \ \i ...---) 17 \
Clrwol Pia Ga9 Coast / % •\ /~ \----k7"....\
S14 through 84, /-` % �\ \J//
N . &6
S20 PC -2 8-9 / \ \\
. 8-19, S18 b7 ' 'J ACC AiAprGSve,LLC Piopw� •N
/ \�
PP PP 22D Z PGfZa ',` WC JlulomalFw,LLC PA)pMa •
ii SN -t / i .2".•': /
PP45 . 1
....?....„._-_,..- --. 1 L-__,
\ EARN
Ow2B [
i `': L
L , ro12i10i
�1k1•I�PP t4 ---
MA-50 ,,,, Tannin PRs �� A NE-P2-1
wl► 1112T� ! O PP,D /PP$ PPi1 <1f<1 �_ _
PP 1 1 - ��..� _ , ' I( ' 1 �� - MW WASTE ~
8.419.5 \ _-_ _ I x.agile— ro - al i + GTP-ji - i' =1•r u/ 3
I
. 1 ,...
// /i i ��,r ,r _;, g , TP '"�° tti
1hnM W9ndovet Property ,pv-ss / I . . - 1 ,:, PT•1D,1,d 52/6 AIMA 1/ - "-4D !�TP-10 �r:):\\-0431\
pPP-sm DPP-x, // _ <1Q01rE�F rL,s 5�J66 _ ` U; �t;1210.8
is
_ ,: k.
/ / I - w! EHouSe osdG •
. i awns
/ \\�� --�I it _ r �-,�p!— r �� ' 1vw s
i ".....,
/ �" —4—_— I II I [ <401<44 p , } I sc 1 B.O. u•ar ` G aw-te
i ` vim+rlr�,modl P�wlr / % •oe,t �1- -- _ 1 I I _ J f — —— `ww' �� t _
,ww-tP wATe1PONo
/ _. o �+� iD . !i i __:eilc:� wE x2T .4...
4.
ti / \.` OS12B 1m—.-� _ ]� o <201<20 j f i •1tw-S �wweo` -ios ++
•
1r.-fir <1!<t !11�� 4 ROB
1 i ntz,ucoous Pz� '7 f<5!<5sl In 0�� �� y(Z ww
`tea-'f8,174.., os t \.-—. I——— {�11 �j i_arp.olip.- -__
waa1w tEsPormA
` orff—iPz t w D770gy ..
`✓ 9 l 5� / �. ossa „cx &ate
in Jii.Mir .�'O1T� \ill QPZ.6 •
i 1 as5s as-so
1 • a ,
D
I I L - _
a /
Lt
�� LEGEND O
P
� • BEDROCK MONITORING VELL 095 - 530 FT BLS) 1111 US
9 Q SHALLOW MONITORING WELL <13 - 49 FT BLS)
i- 0 DEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - 100 FT BLS) ®�
a GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
. SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL
• PIE2OMETER1 1El UTILITY TONER MALLINCKRODT, INC-
1
1 —e— FENCE LI L1NES RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
—:-, - FENCE uNE RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
-4--1--4-1— RAILROAD UIC PERMIT
''- g 581410 JUNE 2008 1,2-DCA 11,2-DCP CONCENTRATIONS, ,g/L
a.•G g 11127 2PNw5
2OO R -DCA i 1,2-DCP CONCENTRATIONS, yg/L
1,2-DCA and 1,2-DCP Concentrations
10 COMBINED 12-DCA t L2-DCP ISOCONCENTRATIONS, yg/L
a �,y, ,^ _ IS OCONCENTRATION CONTOUR INFERRED FROM PHASE II RFI in Deep Groundwater
204)
Pi
$ 1,2-DCA l,2-DiCHLOROETkANE '
1,2-DCA 1,2-DICHLOROPRUPANL ELG 1RE
NOTES 0 200 400 0 AR�s([/�A��
I. NORTH CAROLINA 2L GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR F.2-�A IS 0.3$ pg/L. o
tw YI 2. NORTH CARDLINA 21_ GROUNDWATER STANDARD FM 1,2-DCP 1S 0.51 KO-. SCALE IN FE-i \ \--j
(7

1
,/, /! 1
\•
\\
J If/ \
i p
Cheviot HMIs Golf Cane /eelY +\ ��
51 S14 tiva-2 S1B ' '\ \��
PGPZ-2 S-3 ' /
Z \ �` StB. 5-18. S7 ,PC�23 < lEC AWomdw.ll.0 Pow*, •
N AP- PP-220 $.17 KOAulemoWe,LLC Rnmelq \ // \\
�- �3-15.�8 8-10 1
PgC�2 1 ,,,�888,,,,9999 B a /! ///
/*/-: '--.1 _ \
�QFi9 13 8-11 >i, P-2 J / /' — Y •` / �-
•
i/ 1
BARN
° n _clurr s_ .� a -78 ciYH p"F�
'
i ��PP-13 L 1 T*ES _�_(r�s G� ro 1
1LCA bosoNte, Properb Q ` / ill
\ �/ ��2 B /Q <20 MA-sa n AIN , Q0� f 1fr r 7 as __ 1 �NF�z-a
1�� O vP10 i' KYCROGEN
-JL _ I 1
osTse.
_
-01'0-2 lk,
t V1g PP.s 7 t18 fid.
— Y 'r -- '+1 r 1 //� ��r y- ` r �z 2
0 7 pa 1 ® __ — 1 I'-'7 �_ /; AAwASTe1
E' PP-129 p •3 — 4 — �IT
— ClW �I �'; 0 ,,Far°Nr+ ~- 1 !` MLI.44 ' a.--./ 1 /' , +sa,r" l 'l ..1 . -a a+ g � O � RxW ; 11 a �1ra - n�+ 111 >� . I ' K'"rP-as 2vo \
p�P� i PT-1 + PT J'..1 l! Si �d �'•-' JP-Io �! 0
!, 0
verall►Yldood PN:9017 ` // 1�PT,-S --_ - 1/i ` -
if -200
J �7—�rtw x c
Q.
n // ` �_ f ! — — IrUo CE= �! -- -- 5vw S G -48
a / \ -- - I 1 !II-1...."-M"'"•71;17::- ,,, I f6G-tCalmer "14U W-1ov1i�e►alGwlaoar / �s•os n f II 1 JJ i� as voc1 1 `` �` --Y4_�! 8 .)i/ - - wE.aPO/ .. os,zg / -1 -/:,
os,2n — 4 '- � f wwrs ww-0o_ ww-1os
ii=�`k,4 r n�iso I SI tl I i i�■i '� a� .. �It _ t w•w7n} eASINszw D � �soz i
// r-�r /V. f ��\ _ l I-- I I � wAs1>rho sFaPo�e1+ ��Pzao Pz it �wa_1,s O.
(gym
-- N'.."1/47, 11 I 1 r____Ii.,..... 1 : c �� L- } (,1 � — ♦l- NORTH 5. GC Q�
IM______IL 11,w8w i p
Illili[ I
I. I us
E Er Ike r •
-I us
f7/------------
LEGEND )
e • BEDROCK MONITORING YELL (95 - 530 FT BLS) �f F
o GI SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (13 - 45 FT BLS) II
p DEEP MONITORING WELL C42 - 100 FT BLS) MALLINCKRODT,INC.
I e GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
q 1
ij • SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
pp ♦ PIEZOMETER U1C PERMIT
8 1;' 0 UTILITY TOWER
IQI — r— ELECTRIC LINES Aniline Concentrations
2 -.—a... FENCE LINE in Shallow Groundwater
w1, +-I -1 -f- RAILROAD
g, a;' 86,000 JIVE 2008 ANILINE CONCENTRATION, pg/L
78 2003/290A ?INE CONCENTRATION, pg/L 0 200 400 FIGURE
I :ii /00 . ARCADIS 7
■

J, 1
, / i ,,, ,,„ \
! / \
J % \
c�` / /4,4;::-.
W "41 / \
Q,e+iat HY.Gal,Cons5-14 rwuan 5-79 \ //
i ♦S"21 S5 54 /
PC-PZ-2 s-s / < /
S2n s-18 S-18 S-I MI.0 Aula oha,LLC Rawly '\ \\
PP •PP—♦ +•7 .PGPtS �.0 N,b11,OVn4,LLC F19p�10� /+ •\ // \\
nPP Sl b 15`*s 9-0 P"i / \\ /---------,--, / / \\\
/it .."'?
_� / -44-__•----. GWJ6 r
p 1
a , MC A,runNYA FAWN' / PP-219 7 / PP-14 � l WAS - �Formar �� +�, 1 �NF?Z-1
210#PP-258 ;0$ _ M.46�fJ�� / �^`I I HYDROGeaf 7enrur+PdS '�
a � <20 O 7`\ J� _ TANKS I �.,t ,11,
ui
51P(
-- . - 11 �r�' NF-PZ"2
- •ary PP-i PP-18 _ ' 1 I ( - / RAW W ii
yFC //4�l Gf f.� ��1f I
o PP-,'Z a -r, - _ r •• p ' t�V 'i pT�! �� liFamr�1-44. \ \y
d PP.180 -PiPP,s 4 4.ter` } I t t , ® jf ' I iti f l°'1
ca.
. ' lN,AG FT-40 \� ET., �I I . -7 ' �, 1�P!`_" P�� Z--. GI
w_ii, 1\ \,
Va(w81Yi motlt P, � I f --200
PLANT 15,000�F�- < 0 ~ ��;,7` 35,000 11 .
/..---7 ..... , r _.____ on.,.._—.7--...a. ;72 ...NA.1 700 V\EDI
6 f \ \ 51 51AlClT -- �a Yam'i �atrn...�..,,; � 1,p� G f,�<20 NF-PZ-
N ^ ff / ��" 205
-JI !r___-� I 05 i' 1 .-1 ' V 10•!-zzw__
3 / ` f ` I I I I �-� rp I I `.'-
re vacs%N ar,x om Prop.ny I •OS 1, ~r—————I I I 000 - i_/ �ILJ "3' _ I f ' Oil w�(IERFLU ND
/^ \.\ OS 126 WE XV
12p—,�;\ �-_. . �'.Al; ., 33,000 j11 •,�,,." _ t0s 44
��` osign II y I ° " . 1fit �1� � 27,D001 II n (-e207- --soa- %
x �' "v /jam` 7---/ 09- '\, V 1L. " Pz..,WW-ns ( ,
zi,........
,,
QE)WW0 •
g ( _ r„r — ley •:20 EMERGENCY,'
Ea,BLDG
a e n0 — �
wsw1 ,i1,,,,noi I p
F� �'
- w..,,.-. __.L co __ l �_� I (_ ., t , QQ OS6S OSSF7
—- 1 TPLB
iI Pow
i LEGEND ______-----
e$° • BEDROCK MONITORING WELL (95 - 530 FT BLS)
o E Q SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (l3 - 45 FT BLS) I
O PEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - I00 FT BLS)
1 s, e GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL MALLINCKRODT, INC.
3 1 • SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL RALEIGH RALEIGHPHARMACEUTICAL
PLANT
NORTH CAROLINA
aIEZO ETER
UIC PERMIT
UTILITY TOWER
®
E o w —E— ELECTRIC LINES
1g -.—r- FENCE LINE Aniline Concentrations
2 3 , I 1 ( RAILROAD
S Co '15.000 JUNE 2008 ANILINE CONCENTRATIONS,pg/L in Deep Groundwater
c a it <20 2003/2004 ANILINE CONCENTRATIONS, pg/L11
,j
� (Phase II sr')
u 10 ANILINE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR, pg/L 0 �ALE IN ; _ Rc1ElS I FIGURE
E 'A oII 8

/ 4-
MLC Automotive,LLC Property }/ v.\ %1 \\ --011111111 .
4.
x
}/ PPS '�• x x \ GATOR / \
a / PP-4D % ,_` x STORAGE
? sa, , x 0S-1 i 2 1 BARN
IS.. / i
256.24
p`) /- f _''�`�x , Gw-7: cw s�cwyaD
x
a �a pp At. PP-17 P' x�+ I.PP - GW 7��• 2471 iJui:
ANKS --W257.44��
R r- P• 1. OS-2 Former •l ♦NF-PZ-1
} 240.79 A-5D[n IR 256.OU 1 i Tannin Pits 1 x - y.-1D '"$ Pp : P DUCrS —J HYDROGEN -1----*
1 '--
`� x
QQ •-- 1* H i ROGEN TANKS p a�
F- PP-18D �O5-7D / I� Li'� T. D W-2 r
- -1S `_�� O pp-7 \ {\ O -7S iiIIIR ! ! ' + t`_ 1 r ® �25x.41 •
239.05 PP-5 �' 247.12 IIIr ! ( i = TP-2 y
\ '�GWti'S��GW-3D ©G
KPP-10 e MNm -- I y �x , 255_\73 �� ' NF-PZ-2
k P 9 P 1/ x��� O L71 r�+r.+ LTP 3fir \� i�Bli s K ` —e,„,
E pp-12 d G P 1 —x�" l�iw Elii� 11�1 i P �� :Mall ®257.2a _I F.. 1-1 --1\ re / al\ / \
235.05 p. 15 -� .,�r `r I1 E I r �'r'' I .LUDGE GW-5�
/ 2s ■ i l I �i] ! rP as I •LDfNG » TP S •
` I EDlc ��253.28Igr tJ
. �� R 7. i li �T? D25844- fND 1�26Gw�s MAGFT11N FT-2D �� ,x ( _: xx_� J•CA gI [EE3Ei9_imrr er 11 : I o _ /� �� NF-PZ�
•
c PP-3D + } 251.26� io S _ _ — , Y 1zg4 2 el ma. ) . ill as lio
i IIk . �'
\ L 5 51A/QT ■ 7f►1y � �w+�_=a4t�i�r'"` �1��■Aw `. 41:31GTD
_. NF-PZ-3 OGW-11D
G W-4S
�� 238.63
a /21- / , ` — - i WARE _4USE „g_4`E�� 1 AIM W WI- x
/ h + 257.16iR�n�., 1Cf1 ' o :;1 El
I'' o �1-1 � NF-P2
N ' ! (. , iQs • MA-3D ■ 201 + I 1 Farm. �248.09 *` GW-10
/ 1 I..x # I i SG-1 W 0
a r 0S-11 1 I 111
SHOT W-1 BQ.' 0 1.En FLliSH
% (3 I i — t MA-3� 06 Para 1 r AMID ♦ GW
26421 MA 45 x s w.l.zaz.z
\ r . 0S-12: l —— _/ _1� _~ �259.45i'A ao 11
252-7S I
WW-1( c++N * _ -OS-12D;,f x — MR — ® ri BASIN#1r 4
a x _ _x Ih l 'tI v I i _! I p Vyyy_ • 9S 1` CSy `��. Y— �N M —tit - �1 '71I�f ,. " � LD + �� }_�- �. �NF-?Z-5
�* 1 g oa+ 0 -13D 11�y— I, a Ilia.`:�i� Z_8. 3' J! I B s -SG/ ww_zs + /�Q
rf. — 232.41
E 1�. r QS-13 — I �� ■� RESPONSE Z-B - 11S • f 9
x-�'`_x- 0 1— _ ��� NORTH SHED ?-" LY Pi^wT �1IVW_11D �/ wyy_2D- O
_b } i - . / M _,.... 251.79 3OS-5D EMERGENCY --- [•:
L � � * fl I r �1\152008) �/ EQUIPMENT
O :STEW -
w WSW-1 y secuarcr/ I 0 PZ-5 Pc
.______=!L rEe
\. WI-lousy
` -� _ � _ - l ` I �o —Y G _5 GUARO
OssS�
` - - x�=—= x �z
us --x—x�.Yx — �\
. 1 _ ---x_xx x�
x
x~xixx = x�Y�xrr' x Ww-i2D[� �'�
5 ! U5 x�.—x�x� O _ o ��
E 0 7 °
pr.--,71 ......_
....._ ,..,
_ ,c,„,
, ,
. , -_,,,....../4" .,;.• \
st LEGEND �.
MALLlNCKRODT,INC.
wanm vim,tm RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
a i s O SURFACE VAT*]an • IEDR=PORTFRtiG WELL RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
cgs-530 FT ILS)
SIALLw wartRDE%nu UIC PERMIT
C
a3-45 FT KS)
r /--� (asmm&FEAnRES GROUNDWATER POTENTIOMETRIC
o a i x F♦ LIlE (1Fkp IQ8 YELL
-4--I- e A,ER a+ YELL
SURFACE MAP OF THE
€< _E_ LDES • QMuw>u+ 0 300 600 SHALLOW AQUIFER
_ A.
I F3GURE
—== PAVED MAD
ROAD SCALE IN FEET ARCIDI S U
II if
W LL¢ -
a E E
[� x

* ' — *\ � \ \/ /
MC Automotive,LLC Property /} \ / / —41
t
r
I */+�'1=max_ \ \
/ pp-0s / s_ r` * // \\
x
/ ~� �r� r \ GATOR
/i PP-4D I/ �x l STORAGE
Y/ N x�OS-1 ,4 1 BARN
i
256.24
+�,� / x x çWTB Gw-8B GVY-SD
•
PP- 7 h ��`, ` 1
n o i3 N N LIQUID A•' 'ES, x x x G -7DD {
N , `*• L t uNi TANKS -=�GW-1 NE'GI, x� � 1
ri
r _ o f
I+ p I 257.441 x—
P-14 _ OS�!0 !I C5 4 Former �-- x ♦NF-PZ-1
_ aR Tannin Pits �, s'i� x�x * (II-)
PP,-14 r 256 r 0 PRODUCTS HYDROGEN `��` a ��
% ' 4 0 4 P' 1 t Q 7D HYDROGEN -�� TANKS
P -18D o t. It --II- TP-2D �G -2 r I \
0 2 '.05 PP-15 1 O pp-7 24 7 Z O -7S Y i t ® 26 4
1 Mir I f �+ ,255.73 DTP-2 ' = ;Gw-3s. GW-3D
P• 10/ ®, 40.7= mimu��� 17_6_�`~ ..._ f! =_- , 1 i �� 11 \ g NF-PZ-2 �G
PP-9 •P ■ ///'~~ f rI I I� W_ T= w
236.05 \ s.�F I^� - n���y.1 >ri '+ I
LTPit0 pp1.�- •P•S — � i l II 1 l LLlI �irl�� I �u"m J f 1 F. r f- - S(. G. •N/ r �\ ���t \\
2 1 1 @F1 j ' TP SD I j 3'�'] I r ,
PP / \�1 �1'0 -b MI f r �' �'`I 257:z8� x1 SLUDGE T 1 '
FDIC \ \\ 2� f» 8 E... _.r ) / �e , iC� '4S --I ,OLDING x ®Gw-5D�`�ti
f • TP�D GW-5S ��
A t44.. Y x�, OND I �� P D \ ,6
W PP- / IGI FT110 1J FT;2D .III
_f
ova m,
5 'P 3D Iiii
ANT 253.29yy 1 _257.2B s I`1. 258.4�4 /�-. .30 NF-PZ�
Igh 0 ......, RW-2 C , $ \ '‘Iii‘ vie011ik
o \ 1 51M:1T . ■... ara - 0 GW�D •
a / 51 i � Y��1l�I ►►ne immagik =wi�mm m�,�lik � (C235.63 NF-PZ-3 O Gw-11D
I - 4 AREHOU- OS _lit° H� Ua,.
t \ Y�11r� a• rGVJ-05
, i tad N `� I -- j 2$7. �EI�j kii. A`` �`f li i-_'_ _ - �w .r
ti J / / a �' I f � i..i. IuIA-3�� 201 ��f � I iSG-1 Ior W 1 •k♦ IQ GW-10 NF-P[
4 / ! •262.21', o _ f I - ;;d N
•OS-11 W I I o i� '�IRVy_ 8 Q D USN>P
/ r I ! MA-3 11�� SHOT but
= co �. `f� 7 6cooro ATE' PON� Q
1 .E. -2.7
l G a� .,, .. I f GA
lall
_ !I Wwa's x ,o Sze _, -— — - � 25i�• 1 ` ' ` -sD 1cs +fir
�` _ .—_- - t 251 os�26 x — "1 = r� ���1 a - �_! �. B ost n�� ► 248.09=. _-_� •�
m - o x y x sarrr �� i ♦N F-PZ-5
r C RIFI.' it)D +
.... �r^9`a O^il3D S,` y + a R N (���i■�� � O 2.8�1 . Ea 23f.fU -SG-2- +/ C psw !�r / Pa N O ,325 .26 ` ` __ II �,� WASTEPAU `� P ez ! :5 �Gia WW 2SWc _e.�,_'4"s I T x.� yam.-k I- -1. (- l�ti� � NORTH - *•, • 15 wrs,erx�n B_ -11�7 N-11D WW-2D 09�
co
}l �� J Os-sD 7/232.41
{ EMERGENCY O - \' .•: ��
�a. �", . ,� I © f c — 4�52( ) i 251, Ea B�LDc
sEcuam 0 PZ-5
" .. ,.. d Cl wsw-1 W o
j• V \. HOUSE/ 1 !'
____L
H 3
e
m _ f
Vf 14�=max-� _
C.L.;''.'W,A-v =teani ,
.—x -' ,, ■�y� WW-12De �/
x /
t$ ei )-1-
--...4
LEGEND [ __ Jt \
9 d IllaBBIGvrnt t�wrt ` MALLINCKRODT, INC.
a 0 >£srpxrm■)87®16 maceUTD miry T4VFIt RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
ttT v� RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
n gW wMWATER� s WATER (95-S30 rf ' UIC PERMIT
F, owirricm G N Imm YELLYELLa
o -_�' : "S "°�`E"" „ >�/arum + i GROUNDWATER POTENTIOMETRIC
- a — x— MICE LPE (42-E16 FT LA
SURFACE MAP OF THE
=t } RAMA° e F N°"A1Ot RECOVERY WELL
0 goo 600 DEEP AQUIFER
o c a —E.— ELECTRIC LINES • SWUM RIMEN TflFblART vE3s -
PAVED MAD
s • p�IER I i FIGURE
WAVED WA
IN FEET J ARADIS
O
t j �� {
uu x

CITY.Augusta,GA DIViGROUP.ENV/GIS DB B.Altom LO'A.Saul PIC: PM-D.Malone TM J.FORD
PROJECT NC010714 0006.00402 PATH G'SGIS4Mallinckrodt4MapDocs5F2 NC10714_UIC ER Transacts.msd Date Saved.3/8/2012 7-15'.09 PM
el.✓' , 1F •`�`�iR+le '.a`t.l (VIAL Tank#1 'S s w, .. ►'°�,.
\*ir Imo, ,N . _ _ ' ^ I''�
ie
r.._
_ • _ ,_ *:',.. ' '
F' -YRB- IV' rgge Tank+ t', it• '
, y ,4. t-., �, ,� F, Former B.D. Pend,
•
��y�•'.• �,a •,*"�ii a ..t' 3 III- �. L (ems ' ,
pi)
IF
i� •' � fi { L4 A N.
y I a
'" .�y a Sludge Holding Pon , . '1 1 ..--_-. _r a
- 1,....,,....,,. ., ..,., , , ii •
4F • 1
' '•• 'l N•:::" ' :S1' 4'' :' ; / . illa.
r' •-'.+ i ,M. el. ,.,itt,
• . i r•y Jr. , + 1 (. I f 1
yy
f ,t+r • T
;_ �'tf r!t!, 1.4 I
Ir
, , -dow...1 ._ ..71,-. '',/
1 t
t .
Formerr,annin Pit-� ��1:-J\ r' �1' t' +
• . ,, I L.iji0L- .. ..:J. .,- '• it • P
i ''
•
r .pr .r7r .7 :!. 'rS+1 s'r-� i eel i{ t
n ...... ri 0 "71,
r , .III •'•
_�''`F L. 1 ti 1` r q
..4411
.:""*. ' 3
.- —
' r 'w ll
, ,^ '�Jrc ; i'er r
. - A NVit • l'fr__
. rir- • .0,43 , ', : , 4,L 71 .• V-.
.. .. - . �- Fo • ( Training A ea Warehouse 51 31 • r , r
f P i '"'• pry +
� , • t• `r •
..,,...--;4•..•\t-,s.'• ,: , . . -z,„.%„;fiik - , .. . ., ,,, • . F. I.,,r..,:• .‘
J1 Y 4 L3 E ;A •• �/ f
f I :'
wits •fy N-+ . �49' • ''ry�. . !y�* K� ' a ` ^' .
•,, 0 1'' .. ! ` ' R
_
y ,
f
. x y� . �, � ' r '(). �cr� f .'•. ;,
l •{ �a5�4p� .v• � t 7 .
• aSDO' . � ,':•3. 4`'�' 4,{.I) ,,, '4 , ,
� ,f Kw- + emeco• ,� 50 r'. • ^� .e . .1�'4' " • YF
• • + r �.
i. .. 4, *y5' ` . CV G �9 r. ' • "' .. �s! - r
•
..., .- 4. 4 • ' * '''''',Itlir' ''•'•':- .-• . -'A . -74,'..: - ' .... ,_,, .. .4. - . '•1 '.. - ,'.., ' .-le ..... it 410,p
*"C‘ ? T
' 117yolo . • 0
. "- + .k !. imaging t. O •iia
. . 'i G" `' it R� ' ~', .'�� " ;79 —Plant ,. • 4, -r ,.+a . 1� _ ' }
t.
t to �t 4. t 'r, 1; tollk '�,' �. : r, ` r
r ,r,�'j1 �,`r,i. 1 •'+Ae • 1i.t r y' �' +AI *► lt 4 "
L....4 OPilki
Fr2
1� ▪ �r y Ft. 300xp:' ,. --ry ;,;;9 ":� `r 2 r
i •
r �pyyA. `� •
Durant Ad. Pumping System Lz e •
•ic 7s' "„ 14~ ' • ,.. , . ..,, i• .
f t.' r / f ` L2-1; 800' '. i! ..% *y, ,f t-. r '' ..
w +./,. el- a!y, t f. • L2 E'w K ! t+ f 1 !Joe-, .
i‘ . 4, • V. ...,_ -.
J 'J•F nJ r..-i" mot+ ..i. - �' .. , 1•A. !< • y ,L 1, Ikrt
74,4:.*1,1 ,,:..iiikki a I .4. -n-h. . 4 '''
q• w, A ti 4.1!'�, #;11...
.. _ w- -. , ''i y,�0, >r •J /.lei 1 _,r rr :ill; • ' �.
011?"1".
1111;:• *.,,
•
: r*0 '' .'4'" _ 250 Sao 1 n • i. x '
' g ,yM v: ' t'. .+.1;'•4.-„ , N ' ' MALL1NCKROaT INC.
r> , � � � " : * vfi.13 � RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
SCALE IN FEET A+ . a 5 `y - r ' ,' . ' • \ a"11 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
k1b;'. UIC PERMIT
LEGEND : .: : ;i„�;".; ,•.,: . .i • + �" I
Apparent Alignment of Gephysical Anomaly # ' ER Transect Line Locations
-►. may. 0 CKP WOO OO zoo A00'450' -r r s+ ',0
_a -- Transect Line jWO. w '
;. is
Apparent Width of Geophysical Anomaly •{ !, ,! -•• FIGURE
L3-A Identified Geophysical Anomaly * :�S a' 'vy + + 'k,`�r� „� l t ARCAD1S ^ 1
•a K - ,....4.4, L5-B LS-GA. .:+ .'
. } . .r «•7J :� -, r... ?1

�1 x�x
/ i �
� x
A
` x
.r ) � / =` �x x
GPP-4S i — — � '�= �
= � x`x—
/
O � x—x
} PP-4D_>- - x—_ i
x
,/ / � � -�—x OS-1 j
/t= �'�� ,_ _"~IjiL
�c \` / x
„PP-17 \ �_ x x
* /
}�� PP-13 II \ P -ESA E�f x—x
/ �Y x
F. _/ ' —� GW-1` RGy �'`_
i 4 x-
I IOUID —
�� /Q PP-14 MA-5D n OS-2r K5 J I I — = _
AIR
o '' PP-1D PP"8 PP-6 .x\ ' PRODUCTS I — _�
W O PP-11-'� HYDROGEN _ JL _HYDROGEN 11
PP-18D / �/ OS 7D — ~ TANKS 1 / --, r-
e. + TP-2D
PP-1 S 0 PP-7 k 0S-7S flt 1......i."" ° - f y + �\ 4---- I -
PP-5/ * I
S _ / /
PP-10 e = 1 1 _� ,� _ Pl{RKING AREA + / 4 x
PP-9 PP-16 '- 1 ❑ I/ _ _ _.� — — __ , �! 7- - ~�
< I ` x�x�K~` xi — [� ,1oo
9 TP-3 it f --- -__.! 1 f'
w PP-12 0 PZ-3 \ — —x x L xf
O I 0 f _ 1 r r / _
i ���r - +r ® O❑, i r ^ POND 1 x
PP-19D 0 1 1:11 c] - ,I 1 1 ��
PP-15 / \ I _ - �' o ' -TP-5D N r SOUTH +
B1 a i B3a PFT-2s ] >2 .-0 0 ,� r s
a } / 1 \ , ❑ r Q Q , f I!
i. // / I ; \ \ 1 FORE i f S „ V/ I , 903 . �} + TP-4S i H
6. / I MEDICAL PT-1D \ \I RJ �� .�. ElO +TP-4D O--___PP-3S / IMAGING /FTDIT AREA / 1 961 i
PP3D
PLANT MEDICAL IMAGING ' I 4 / 1♦:CILERHOUSEa rrg I� i. �x--X=
O PP-20D // ) PLANT PROPERTY ) FT-1 S-- — —` 0 S_3 O - y— �_ ► i -
/ � r-xO / L - �Jx _ � MA-2 A MA-17l
h \\ \ Lx�,��+ Imo_ �� y 51 A/11T 1 — �M �� (ZQ')
]03
// �`\_ �'- II I 1 — — — ——� 1I d WAREHOUSEOS-4 {�� rr.~ 100 r 1 - ❑ — —
I I — I04 1 01 : :.
// — — J — LI I �� IeOa 102 00° MA-3D • 01 200 204 205
M I I
( I l_ oo � ■•��// k� 0 OS-11 1 I I I A — /IIII MA-35 V k �„ - r
w ,dt Property _1 t [ 1 — J o e �0. • ■mo01 o
��+. 1 pf \ _ _ / - - - - �� 414MA-�45 MA-4D
._.,____
�z�r
/ N`X 6"HIGH EN CHAIN-UNIX z OS-120 ) L - — -— _ -- / \ D
_________ ___
..____„
I \�_ o�Pe r`-r..._x--X"�%—�—X f�-Y' Y —_x_x I ! \ V} M +
i / - on _ Y4 1 SOUTH
I it I EMERGENCY I ! 9.
� Air ,x G. x
m Hgraees ! �`p-r `_`^r _� 40-5173D [ Il 1 I�QUIPMENT.-o // --`_ , 1* \. -/ , I SLDG ! ` HAZARDOUS SI
� I OS ——— I f WASTE PAD RE
_ r '�x�l I — — — ., tiJ OS-5S� SI
U '
` I �� �j d OS-5D NORTH
6 > / c°rterPrppen — EMERGENCY f; Y ❑ Jones et oI. Propertyf l l
E. r 1 rni ir
II 52 908)- EMERGENCY/
0 0. L E G E N D r _� `xl
s¢ + 1 ` O z �I, y NIALLINCKRODT LLC
�i • BEDROCK MONITORING WELL (45 _ 45 FT BLS) n WSW-1 I 4 `W', SECURITY
c g 0 SHALLOW MONITORING WELL (I3 - 45 FT BLS) C 'I. �' ` 1 GUARD RALEIGHLE PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT
W , _ HOUSE RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
o N 1/ e DEEP MONITORING WELL (42 - IOfl FT BLS) _ - 1 PHASED IRM COMPLETION REPORT
i c w e GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL - _ _____L_____
- �4+
o . SHALLOW DRIVEN TEMPORARY WELL - - _ _ - _ 4 -- I MONITOR WELLS USED
s A PIEZOMETER FOR CONDUCTIVITY TESTING AND
s w0 ® UTILITY TOWER US j x�rx—x--x
3l ii' — [— ELECTRIC LINES / l ' TRACER TESTING
e g —x FENCE LINE FIGURE
sc5 I I i I RAILROAD I SCALE IN FEET r �_ _- 0 ARCAD1S 1 2
%E I

ARCADIS
Attachment 1
Geophysical Study
Update dated
December 17, 2010
G EM/ekeleverod IGroubrelerpNC107014 0006(RPM a[Fee Trarreng AreaMeportslUlC Perrrit EvaWake ro Traon StWrTex3vlgai Evalvabm b Tracer!rt.:e es•3-27.2912.Draft cloak

ARCAD1S
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27507
MEMO Tel [phone]
To_ Copies. Fax [phone]
Don Malone
Joe Quinnan
ARCADIS G&N!of North Carolina,Inc.
NC Engineering License#C-1869
NC Surveying License#C-1869
From
Alan Pinnix
Boyce Clark
Date: ARCADIS Project No.:
17 December 2010 NC107014.0005
Subject:
Geophysical Study Update, Mallinckrodt Raleigh Pharmaceutical Plant, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update of new results for a
geophysical survey conducted on November 5 and 6, 2010 at the above referenced
facility. This memorandum is a supplement to the Two-Dimensional Resistivity and
Magnetic Geophysical Investigation (ARCADIS July 2010) report that discussed the
results of an initial geophysical survey conducted at the Site during the week of May
24, 2010.
Background
In May 2010, three 2-dimensional electrical resistivity surveys and a single
magnetometry survey were conducted at the above referenced site. The primary
objective of the initial survey was to identify the location, depth, and/or orientation of
the subsurface geological feature(s) that are causing the unique migration patterns
for the Site constituents dissolved in groundwater_ The original proposed
geophysical surveys included both a magnetometry survey and an electrical
resistivity survey. However, the magnetometry survey was conducted first to attempt
to confirm whether a diabase dike could be present. Following the determination that
diabase was not present at the site. magnetometry surveys were not conducted on
the other two lines,
G tNVWIaNinckrodl(Groun0water)WC107014 0005(W-Res Cheractenzabon)\ER Survey Results1Decernber 20105Deoernber 2010 Geophy,cs Mertes docx
1/5

ARCADIS
Three resistivity survey lines were conducted at the Site along transects to the long
and narrow dissolved-phase groundwater plume to evaluate the potential for and to
determine the location of subsurface geological conditions that are creating a
preferential migration pathway below the Site.
Based on the results of this work, ARCADIS determined that several large
preferential migration pathways exist below the Site. These pathways were generally
located orientated north to south, exist at approximately 30 to 50 feet below land
surface (ft bls) and align with areas containing groundwater impacted with 1,2-
dichloroethane; 1,2-dichloropropane; aniline, nitrobenzene, and other constituents.
Based upon the confirmation of north to south trending preferential pathways a
second supplemental geophysical survey was conducted in November 2010. This
survey was conducted to determine if the linear features extended further north
beneath the main manufacturing area and also south of Durant Road. The results of
this investigation are presented in the following sections.
Resistivity Survey
The second resistivity survey was conducted the week of November 1, 2010. The
Site layout. location of monitoring wells, and all geophysical survey lines for the
property are shown on Figure 1.
Two additional geophysical transects (Lines 4 and 5) totaling approximately 1,290
linear feet were completed at the Site during this event. Line 4 was oriented east-
west north of the main manufacturing area (Figure 1). The line originated south of
the Raw Waste Surge Tank and north of the Sludge Holding Pond. The line then
extended east to the south of the MASL tank#1, crossed under the railroad spur and
then extended the width of the former B.Q. Pond prior to terminating at an asphalt
road that leads to Building 15. This orientation represented the greatest potential for
getting a continuous line of data across the site due to site limitations (roads,
buildings, piping, rail spur, etc).
Line 5 extended west to east in the large wooded tract south of Durant Road. The
line was started approximately 300 feet west of the intermittent stream to cross the
area historically exhibiting impacted groundwater_ To the east of the stream, the line
was extended another 250 feet east in the direction of Capital Boulevard (Figure 1).
1ENVYAepinekrodl(GroundNeler)NC107014 0005(Kr-Res Chereaenzalion)ER Survey ResultstDecember 201CDecernber 2010 Geophysics Marna doer
2/5

ARCADIS
Electrical Resistivity Technique
The electrical resistivity method involves the measurement of the apparent resistivity
of subsurface soils and rock as a function of depth and/or position. The resistivity of
soils and rock is a complex function of porosity, permeability, ionic content of the
pore fluids. and degree of clay mineralization.
During a resistivity survey, current is injected into the earth through a pair of current
electrodes and the potential difference (voltage) is measured between one or more
pairs of potential electrodes. The current and potential electrodes are generally
arranged in a linear fashion with the geometry of the current and potential electrodes
being referred to as an array. Common arrays include the Schlumberger array
(normal and inverse), and the dipole-dipole array. Similar to the initial event. both the
dipole-dipole and inverse Schlumberger arrays were used in this study.
The resistivity equipment used during this investigation consisted of an Advanced
Geosciences, Inc. (Austin, Texas), SuperSting"' R81IP memory earth resistivity
system with a 112-electrode switch box, electrode cables with a 3-meter connector
spacing, and stainless steel electrodes.
Upon completion of data acquisition, initial and terminal electrode locations for each
line as well as electrode locations in areas with significant topographic changes were
marked with flags and general elevation changes recorded. These data can be used
to establish elevation changes along the transects so that the geophysical data could
be corrected for terrain during processing. The terrain change along the transects
was minimal for Line 4 so no topographic correction was needed. Terrain correction
was made for Line 5.
Resistivity data were stored in the internal memory of the SuperSting R8/1P and
downloaded to a laptop computer upon completion of each survey. Field data files
were assigned a name that included Line name and array type. Preliminary
modeling of the field data was conducted in the field in order to optimize the
subsequent data collection
Survey Line 4—Electrical Resistivity Results
The inverted resistivity model for data collected along Survey Line 4 is presented on
Figure 5. A quality assurance check of the dataset indicated high quality data for the
eastern section of the line Between the 0 mark and approximately 300 feet data
were collected; however, the data was dropped out during data processing due to
GLLd 1 I,r,ck,od1(Groundwater)hNC107014 0005(Hi-Res Characlenrzahon)1ER Survey ResulfslDeeerr ber 20101December 2010 Geophysics Mema deux
3/5

ARCADIS
apparent interferences most likely related to the existing MASL tank area and
lagoons. As this location represented the greatest likelihood for success in the
northern manufacturing area, a second line was not attempted. Between the 300 foot
mark and the 750 foot eastern end of the line, high quality data were obtained.
Processing of the data indicated a single large conductive feature at the approximate
600 foot mark of the line. This line is close to the location of former recovery well
RW-1. The geologic feature (Labeled 4A) was located at approximately 30 to 50
feet bls. This feature is consistent with both the depth and orientation (north to
south) of suspected conductive features seen in other transects.
The location of anomaly 4A is in consistent alignment with historic groundwater maps
depicting constituents of concern in this portion of the site trending north to south.
Survey Line 5-Electrical Resistivity Results
The inverted resistivity model for data collected along Survey Line 5 is presented on
Figure 6. A quality assurance check of the dataset indicated high quality data for the
majority of the line. The data removal was uniform throughout the dataset except for
the area approximately 320 feet down the line, which corresponds with the crossing
of an intermittent stream channel. The primary geologic features apparent in the
pseudosection are three highly conductive areas (labeled 5-A through 5-C), located
from 30 to 50 feet bls. All three conductive features are consistent with the response
of material with higher water saturation than the surrounding material. The large
feature labeled as 5-C may appear larger than it actually is due to interference
(saturated soils)from the intermittent stream channel. The location and depths of
these features line up exceptionally well with features in the other survey lines. In
particular, the features match up well with survey line 2 located north of Durant Road
(Figure 7).
Conclusions
The resistivity results of all five lines completed to date are consistent with the current
conceptual site model that a fault, fracture, or more likely a linear, heterogenic,
partially weathered zone is trending north-south through the Site. The large
conductive feature present in all five pseudosections is approximately the same size
and depth on each line. The conductive features are presented in plan view on
Figure 7 and labeled.
G:SENVWtalhnckrodl(Groundwater)NCl07014 0005(Hi•Res Chmaderue5on)\ER Survey ResuhslClecem6er 20101December 2010 Geophysics Memo duct
4/5

ARCADIS
The results obtained from this geophysical survey correlate well with historic
groundwater data and the prior resistivity survey conducted in May 2010. These
results further strengthen the conceptual model for the site and suggest these
features likely play a significant role in controlling the groundwater flow direction at
the site. Additional investigations are planned in early 2011 to evaluate and compare
the hydraulic properties of the aquifer within and outside of the geologic feature
including:
• Installation of soil borings within and adjacent to the primary geologic feature
within resistivity survey Line 3 (Figure 1) to evaluate soil types grain size
variances, and distribution of chemical constituents.
• Conversion of two of the borings within the primary geologic feature into
multi-purpose monitor wells.
• Hydraulic testing within the two new wells, and other select wells within the
geologic feature.
• Single-well tracer testing using fluorescein dye to evaluate groundwater flux
within and outside of the geologic feature.
An underground injection control (WC) permit application was submitted to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) on
December 9, 2010. ARCADIS anticipates NCDENR requiring at least 60 days to
review and approve the permit application. Therefore, the tracer testing likely will be
conducted February 2011. This schedule is dependent on NCDENR's review and
approval of the document In the mean time, ARCADIS is planning to install the soil
borings and multi-purpose wells at the Site during the week of January 10, 2011.
G',1ENVM4aginckrodt(Groundwaler)WC107014 0005(Hi-Res Charaderizetion)5€R Survey ResulislDecemhei 20101Decemher 2010 Geophysics Memo.doce
5/5

:,••-,Lo • • • Arr. 4.74111 .
. Ille0.1.11 1... 11.1
• • ,, ME OEM . 'tfi •
Iffi L •4 I • i r,,0,.: •••....
Po,d NO rm.-- . ;
• •••• 1% ''..;" ;444;‘,.,._•4' -•\ , r,,, ,,.( ',, ••
'4, I 0^1..r E.,02 . .-.--.
• ,4 riv :-1 :',4,'`Vsk' ' .1 .`• ' • .ii," -' •••••• ''''' Nif ''ft.'••, .le';,14W .... •-..,t , ...,•' v,..,... • ,',..''.„ ',1. 'i , 4 . . li • ,' ,1•.! 1 ..." ` • . ,,, 5 .•
.11
r. '4:kk li 'f i?c. .. V. i.,,,,%. ' . ,•le.i. ....a.. • ' , ,... . r
,...9.9. :1, C...4.1.4"....• ' .. 7".•-' . • ..,4c'st..: -, .: . r .•
150 200' 25(7' .30 0 350.,ap' i•.0,,z. . ,
'it."' . Id • . ,
• .41.
--.,:j,',.4.1•:, •1), 4 , ,..:- 4,4,. ,.ir •' -r.
,LAigh,, ... ",..4I*• 4, 450 500 55o.-.,
''''.2, •
, S
, . .. .
.... ,t• criciusay 7,
, .
. ... ... . ....__ .4 I .
.41.
II:r
, •
, .
... 4. ....1 , ••• -s ' .",,,.-e: . SURVEY 1...!1gE 4 . '
. „.I 4 11-4.---. ` ". *4•• • 1 fe.
. . .
_
- • ...t6r...1.4,.:44;,"..--:'
.,. • .„ ,
f '.. i.
,..
t,......,,,, ,,.,,,,
, .
. • 4 R. ,. r, .
, • , ..
/ 4, '.,' •', # r.
rk
Irr.'" , ,- , >it'.••
1:1 A„, . r
. ,
r ,,,;t - . ...f ••• e IL •141Wiii.:r• ,-Nt'F.
...
• -... 40 .1r , .
It‘. "li_.I tik 'I, 1- •... ,4
, ..4 ,,,, . , . ,'A ‘ e •• "460 # • --'-; r- -• e 0, - • -„. , ;, , .,. .
'1' ..N:5 PI;r,..1. k • :1
311 . 4... . ,..?• ,oul -... •• •
r , .1 ''rritr:N14•:,. • • ....t. tIt 'wit.- •,,r- s,.. .„-•-,.r, .,. *11.• 1 1 ' "•,.."
.-• - - 'i...r.z- „•.: -:;,,P-, .: r . *
i )r . . -• - •,.i• r. • „\.• r .; r , ...:•,,,o,
,.. _ ..
.,.... .
: • ...• .. ' .i ,. • ', It. ii .._ . , ., 1 ... .,,,,,,,-- ',:•:". .,,,...._.., ....t: ,..k , , %. ••••*!::-
..-.
ir 4i-',. .........• ,. „ ..., .,..,_ ,
I ,
:• 4 .1,.., 1 714 rin
...
... , . 4
- ' . t • ,. -I i
•,,„,--, - ,• -;:, .*..-.,," , ---- . .. . r, .. __;-, . • Virei ' . ,'''i, ' i . ,,)7..
. ..!,.. .,•• ..
1 .
,. . — .,.1. ,...,.,
, ,••.
-e-74711°,, ''
.,,.3 4 ,. •••
it, ;;....A ''il , • f-
• -....1. 4i. ,' ,
1..- . ' •6° , kt:-..i 447 , ,f rr , 1 r- -It AO. p ••
. ,i.
(--- • _ ., ....a ,.., i
' 1. _ .3 4-
k ., ‘ I 1 Ii4 ,1.,_
. . . 4 ,';17; •.
...t , ,
. ' --- ' :7.,,-- 4- _. 7
,,- • • , it . . T I - -"- ft i I ' '‘'.- i•
.
,
.
.4. -, 4,ik. i • . , r r- , , I., , . — .: .
,,,, ___, , . -,-,. . 1
,
..
. I , • :4 ' '\\
--I . 'e'r.r• ' • .4. 11 ',4 • q ''`'e`oW,1•., •• : ; '
,
4., r, .e- er .. , ii. 4, . 1 4 ,
I
• r'' ' V. f i , ` 1 „. f'
, row.,-.--i. •. •.4"114410, . ., 1 . ,t,4(11. .11 , Tr ,
'(
, . • 41
.-'''•`• ., .
I'r' • ilx..., .. .
. it ,
.1'..-
.. ... . ... . .
• '14 I '
•for •,•• • •ei ,, i',• I r
',.'•••,:-.4•7 / ,fif. .
J-Li5r• Kik. . 1-.,_, .i':,i,
, .. ' 4 .„,,,,-. •:.•-• - . . ..
,
yr • •--.* y•I`Pk,- ,... , 1 • .1..„1,.4i.ittii-ji ill ... ., 1
1 - r ?, ii_-7--, • • - . -,....',!-- )1, . ..
• ......
1 •,..___. 4*A,.
,,-{7....1 — -, ,-.; "•*. 'isz,_ '• , _,....,_.._..... '•"*""...--4.--.1-.... -rt ,fr-1..! , • '
.4 . . 7 —, ' — '-. ,,c, rV e•' • .4„. - •••. .,.• • ,•••• It • ' • , \ r, p ' , •- we. ., ', 1 arm , ,
. -.:... , ,•„.•.._.•, ,, . 1 1 r
%., 041r....„ -•
.!;',4.. ' .
...''.-;00„*. '''t ' AA-,.• •,`t. :; _ 1"'• IL„ Irr - -.7 4 tk.-" :. '14" -" ,r
. .
, - ..e..5.. :,.. ,,
. • --- ' .4k..' -, .r. :•14' - ' il.'`Ik, ..." • • 'la
- •4. a -,1, ,, ifk ,. , '',/_•
----.41111111511.5511114 t 4.41.„ .
/
••• ,,, 1..q ...
: :: ' -..e416 'A :.,. , 4 r- ' ' 4'' . . 4 • . .
• ___ ,
/ ...
.'•,„,, CI."Iv ' ••• k
,.• i,,,ie • . ...
..
. •
t.
' et Os•I
.. •‘ .....••,, „ ,--•• , e I,4
... ...
Ili ' .ii•'' * •-• _. .. .'
‘0, A-••-:. •,,,_•:,• i, ... .
• --.
i•IC ,--
, •••.,,,,, 2 ...... . - • '', . • • .iho
z• •tii
* •I .•
- - • •
• ,. .
,,.1 y.... -- d- . "..,,, 4. ••. , •i••
.m....\L If FT-2S'''' .."'r-T 2D 4. i I 11 i H
f• e'••, T‘
IL :p•L., ":,• ' ,a„4; - AO. ,
40 . ,,,iiir.k .: „
1..401;
Tw. ,. • : . ,m. ..-
-zi ••.. • .-4-,0.- . . - ., , tt•,. ...3
••
' SURVEY LINE 3 '' .. •. •116 • ', ,
Irtiiik
' I, • 'N.% 'IZ 4 •1
'I,'' ' . ''' ' ' ' •-k' ' .4.!,.' .„,..ir,-.', :°-,, .: ....• :, ..•
IT ,.,-- - ii• •• • ••• •• ,.. -
I h • ri' .1e, ; * • ' '
i . -i/ ,. ,
%:-.•
.
1-t if •litv,
;i . ...
- ;111.4;410:-•• .„,-1- ....4„...- 1/"' • .'7.. ...... - .o. ,•;‘6. 4.et...,. . • _ .-, G,% ., r , • ' . r ?,- 4.- , • ,i 1:1 MID. - . ; r•l• - .,
. , 1.•
•
''' .- — - ''-'''., ''r ' - . FT-IS• ', .. ` • r I
. 11.-..-- -,. • . • ,. , - • • — . ,
,
-- - - i -.4."•A •04, -
L., --1-1.35-,-• • __4•;4•1•,,,,. .v - _,,,•
_ ..,4„.„.....--,,,,„ - 1', . • • • ,.
• •• , • Z
,, • • ,7' • - --' -
- , :: - -----ipa !'" " ••I‘:-1.•4' .4.. : ioow 1°92 -• -st,7 ';'a1,. . .• ,:::drIS-, -.'• ;;:i..1-4, " I!'it'•',,,r ''' . : . ' ...%.4..lir, •-1 --,1%.-Ihr• # *. „.,rpm cip 950'
.
' °•.•" "; :44••'-'1b°-.1a:'..111,7 ....- WCPC7a51.u"
CZ)133, .• "' ' OS:130 t
' 'k. • 'Cr -.0i..1'44114,••• • .4).- i,.. it,
er:PcDeu . •••• :r :Ico r
,..,,• .t. . ..19,'7' ''. 4,,r .19 • 'at,. • • ., .,.. '. eria 11234IP- -44. 7,41t.%‘..--le..N.p* •,,,---. ‘7"• v ',, • .,.1/4 .. WE,CO Ai-; ,.
-7,'•",. • : '':' 114 '", .:•:'" . ' . , ,, ,,q7",1',C, -• •• '11,4r ,
...1 '. [a ‘ „
.., ''-.. ....4' .le '.474i• ' '.4,;', '1 ,k ' ' • ' ' ','s • i ,' i•AL . '• ' > , • -• .t ''' 1.,,..41 . -,,L . .. - •••
t• • • , .• t, . i• 4 i
.
,
.. - P 4 . et, ,44 .Kir.31 ••-• • • "" "` ' • _ ........ .41, - ..- . . , .. - - . •-,..L.fely1 - -,', • ie' , tf. , •
•' "".' •-1..Y . ''' --C' ' .\ " ..,0' . •••IK4pr•• 4 .} • • •' • -•.% ''. • .Ai; , 9 7'9' * •• Z .*4• .I'. ' ; . .. -.. . ' 'OW . ' \ " . ‘0'.' :V.4i,-1.4 ...„4•-•• ',. .A.9..0k II* -.r. *".•'' ' , ...4.1" • ''' .. ' k
r rr:r • .,'1-'• - - -K.- . FSLIRVEYL,INE2 !.:v,1:-.4,,• ...,..„11:10A.''''"%. ;41
0..., - • iv -,1.-.- -
• • r 7. L.'-,.•.....,
• . ..... It. . i•
•,.... • tr• &a . 11.-j.... -..,-....." 9-,
I '1'.'#11r2g221114)4 . I
• • • .
-_, s , ..., ....4,-, - ' ,-r• • r- . .
, • .,._ , wsw_., , •
. . — . ,_-.. .. , .. •
j, i, ',.. 04,14-; y .,,,,,..4-- - - . .,,. ..,•,.. li 'Al
,...,. , „ ., . .
.. . ,.-• . ,.,
. , j., iv.. 4, ..r
-- .'
.. .. .
. ,.. .
4, . . ,..4.14,,,-"'
• -?7'•
'r.Ttfr •"'
. .. ..,
_ rti4, , Asi.,r,) ...... , .. .....,.,,
, - ,.. I.
- '
. ...
,•
. 1k.
L..y.„. ,..., , .. ...,..., ....• lei.-
v. /9 * • V.Ai ' . Alk
, 'S-.. ,''4.1 ,.„. ••. ii;
4: • . ;, "„y•, •l':-. .-1,••• ..k... ' *" '.0.
.
, ih..
*.k. * ', * • d'. ' , -.* SURVEY LINE 2 ..
.,„... .-..4. . • L.' . S ''' . 4r,_. .L. C • %I.
14, ,ji..„:; :14,,,e. .„„„.. ---1-., PP-11 ' pp.6
ve; 10.9
• flr,
-3 CI:7350'
/
4 : ' • ••4; --.. .; • I • . ''
* ''..: ' ' 1*
400' oni/ - - . • r' - .•. , ,0
r — • . A : f / • --- _ k ; , i . . 0. ri 1
t.-...
..
- ,...... r. q,....• ,,b,... , vt,-,--,-A. - .. i : • PP-1 7
a, to
. l'"•:-.1, ..,. ' , ,,,.."; .,. .1. ...10,.; ,..... . PP 14 „„,„. ,. ..,,,.....,___,....n
1.„
IZ, . .-4•• .s....; .44, • -• ,-;, ill:, ,„,,, ,,ik;,•.7 , 4.• •14. ,- ,
Cf12,1"
04't, . ••:" ,''• ., '°` ;.„,,.,7•44..'", '''' • • or'.. _...
-:'.. 7 . ' ., -',..„._/ -"‹• -.4Ii, •1, ...,,,t,,,. .. PR-87. ...:' , 1(0 ° ,•\* Irk ,., '
. ..
,loiyA4 ?: 4%,.. . ..• 'I . • '": I •'‘' , C%Ck`*•,.. ei:PriValif' '1'44 ..9.,..' . : ...-....1 .. ' ' i .'
'..4. ....At'L0,114.-'• '/*Sri •14, .• . .
• l' ''' It .41' ''',., tSt° .4 .
pp,9 riXti ' ...?
.: ;, .. , . -4 '' • -•• .- itc. -- - ' 10 - ,
At .„ . , ..„, ,,., _,.. t. .4. , • •14, -.„.) i
,. . - . 4..-
' .
' •4,4 PP-5 -, ', .. ••
PP-12 --- +.4-7' ',. ., • 4- / . iii, IN ••,e . . ' • A'.
'' "' Iiiii
. . 13P-1D PP-1S PP-16 '''''''-` - • PAD •! '"'.` " '' 404 '- ,'
x411P1'7*.• , . ' • OS 11 a
., ,.
.
_..._....
., ; ',„f -,1 "-', , . . • ' , t * •
1 - •- '
. . , .
.,., .
.7..' --i*AA ' 7,- - "'''' ., ., •
•
y j... .. .4. wx., . ,,,.,_„"„..zt..64,.... _,,,, ,,.,..., . , . '' ',..07 1'7-'7' 1 :.' •ilk, ;' '-Ai-
e
sy , ,! . i•r_r•-"I,- ',..,... ,_. • ..' ,.• • .
•,A k L . ,
•If
'' ''Ir• '''.0**'. . ' . ...*9 • :'2'9•*.r 51'.1.- ... ...P. "'• ,k ' '
. I*'''''.4'1*.•'.0.- •::'.;-;'''-4:le....' ' ' . . '••••• . -"' *•'-' . :r f:' ' . '„ .'' •.,. • ;-.4-,` ""'• ''''..,it\. ""' ,P.''-,' ''%' i ..i, --4.1.....
a•-
•,1 •'I''' f , 444:T ..i',... , ,...I
• 104 i- ', •.d...
.,
.• 9., . • . . . i ,.. N, -
lit4,/..*.4?-.* •"" --.4.-1::4- •••-1 '•-•' e'•‘ ''_ '-N ., . I: • . - . . i 1 11_, 40 ••••-• •,,,••
. . -•,•
— • i
•-!"),1'.' f.,....,!..'..- •' •-'' % 7 7' 7 ' .' • '.4- . . • . r,a• -41i7: •• ' .... 0 • lk •.4, ...;• ' r••••,...i;:••
. • • -.. , r4.,:-.1.a , ''.1 •"...
. 1A14.114
C.A_,4 i.'.,.-'tr-'.....':r"".•.,...
„....i:...;,11.-.•;
•.,•••-•-.".
,..4,-,..:,•,m''
•.if.-,,: ;A;;...t-i.•k•.4...,.
•. e.y.'t 4ir-c-4ka.,,•o•-,•4•1,,t 1 Vcr.•j y,.'.•,e.1E44\.V• , ,.'•.'
,•.,„-
:
4-,
.t' 5.',0",....„C.•.•1
•,O„,M; "
, 0
, ' a.-M%.t•,,..'.;;';..r.)!f.4,1,O,.`.,•..-
•.•.•r•.A--..
.k.,.r,-...i4'.c-,,f....•4.,.•
.„•.
\•.','.,'.-.,,..•.,1,-........''.-..
0 suRvEvLiNE5 ,' , ‘ _ , .•..,..,.r..,..._..',
er
,.1,a,'•"'4.1.'!.:\,'-
..,.0-
,"••'
,•..4..*•9,', • .•\t,i.•,,.
..a•1•.•...'i•,.1
X.'.;".•1'''f•4•,,1-,.7o5li.4h4-e'v7y.'r.'0t„i-'.-;-
•„
.r..
•
.•...•,,
.44... -A ., • . f • *-
. ..,
. ..,
. -' . • - 3 s' I .i'it
PROJECT MANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Dan Malone
ARCAD1S Resistivity Survey Line Locations
DATE DRAWN
MALLINCKRODT INC. 12 13.2010 JWC
0 125 250 500 RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
imam Feet RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA NC107014 0005 00200 1
maw 'immimmommailmm ,
u\prclectsMallinelcrod1lOutputTINALFteURESTlGUREOS 42 ad
U 5prorecislMallinckrodKArcMaalFIGURE01_42 rnxd

Inverted Resistivity Pseudosection - Inverse Schlumberger 1 Dipole-Dipole Merged Array
Utility lines(water/steam)
10 deep
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 500' 600' 700' 800' 900' 1000' 1095'
Ohm-m 100000
,, - 6700
Q _ T
6 L -c
Vali
_ - 445
a
II 120 -
4, I
180 - - 30
240
Iteration = 7 RMS = 5.39% L2 = 3.17 Electrode Spacing = 9.84 ft
PROJECT MANAGER DEPT MANAGER
Don Malone
Magnetic Response and Electrical Resistivity Pseudosection MALLINCKRODT INC. DATE DRANMBY
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT 07.20.20t0 SDR
,, Survey Line 1 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
ARCADES NC107014000500200 2

Inverted Resistivity Pseudosection - Inverse Schlumberger I Dipole-Dipole Merged Array
Utility lines(watertsteam) MWPP_1•
MWPP-17. 'Chain Link Fence MWPP-8 MWPP-9 rnder9round utility(gas)l
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 500' 600 700' 800'815'
Ohm-m 100000
0 -
A • - 6700
L2-Ei L2-D .-
50 - .- - -_ L2-C L2-E
L2-A ,00.---
45
100 - •-
a
0 1 -- ' - 30
150 -
2--
200
Iteration = 8 RMS = 5.53% L2 = 3.26 Electrode Spacing= 9.84 it
Magnetic Susceptibility Response - Vertical Gradient
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 50 0' 60 0' 70 0' 80 0' 815'
2500 - I I I
,I
2000
t 1500 - i
• 1000 ,!
H 500 • Piii
o - AL
c 0 1co
Z -500
-1000 -
-1500 I T 1 f 11 1 T 1 T 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 .I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I
PROJECT MANAGER' DEPT MANAGER:
0- .. ',
Don Makone
Electrical Resistivity Pseudosection and Magnetic Susceptibility Response MALLlNCKRODTINC. DATE DRAWN BY
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT Drzozoro SDR
Survey Line 2 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
ARCADIS NC107014 D005 00200 3

Inverted Resistivity Pseudosection - Inverse Schlumberger I Dipole-Dipole Merged Array
Utility lines(water/steal _MW-X MW Y
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 500' 600' ,� 700' 800' 815'
1 I I Ohm-m
40000
+10 �. - - - - -. -- - 0
do.
11116,33 -
L3-A - 4229
_ -
83 - = - 447
_
a
Q 134 , - - _ 47
185 5
Iteration = 8 RMS = 3.04% L2 = 1.02 Electrode Spacing = 9.84 ft
`PROJECT MANAGER DEPT.MANAGER:
Don Malone
Magnetic Response and Electrical Resistivity Pseudosection MALLINCKRODT INC. DATE DRAVNVBY
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT 07 20 2010 SOB
l Survey Line 3 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
ARCADIS NC107014.0005.00200 4

Inverted Resistivity Pseudosection - Inverse Schlumberger I Dipole-Dipole Merged Array
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 500' 600' 700' 750'
Ohm-m
0 , 5000
Fes' {
21 i �
r.
Data Loss
71
.c 43
t KAI
❑ 8
86
Iteration = 6 RMS = 10.74% L2 = 11.70 Electrode Spacing = 9.84 ft
~
PROJECT MANAGER: DEPT.MANAGER0
Dan Malone
Electrical Resistivity Pseudosection MALLINCKRODT INC. DATE: DRAWN BY:
RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT 1z.1o.2010 SDR
Survey Line 4 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
ARCADIS NC107014.0005.00200
I ,

Inverted Resistivity Pseudosection - Inverse Schlumberger I Dipole-Dipole Merged Array
Intermittent Stream Channel
0 100' 200' 300' 400' 500' 540'
Ohm-m
0 . , 0 - 10000
:.. � ), [ 2060
21 �.. . . `
z,� � � 424
43h X
d g021
_s=
N e.X. -
64 4h h;
87
:.. 18
8fi
Iteration = 7 RMS = 5.79% L2 = 3.72 Electrode Spacing = 9.84 ft
PROJECT MANAGER: DEPT.MANAGER:
Don Malone
Electrical Resistivity Pseudosection MALLINCKRODT INC. DATE: DRAWN BY:
0 RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT 12.10.2010 SDR
Survey Line 5 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER:
ARCADIS NC107014.0005.00200

•�. .�, - ...y,� , "t r ♦ ', r: "i ,,,'�.:,, 1 ; �, ' re-- w, i Po�1d Nn �`rihr r^.
\ " } + "S' t' l ` '" M ti' 44 a • , ,+r •
I.arl!1?r E.cicts *..
.,
10
..
.._, .:
:.,..:,....:., a • ,. .0t.,
�,' J y ',r l 1b• , ',• - _ - . i�` ; R#' .�{ w rJ1 •
550' 1 1 ef�!� 1._ . ,
4
' 1 '1: • n "'�ti - a '+ .r.:r ��Y r 750' a ,tfir
j .
-:,./
, -,.,- r*' , SURVEY LINE 4 ' I '�6
M. .64
tipt,:or„....._ 11 I '. .''' . ' , ' • .- .
...,_„„il Air * ,.... •., It . i ,i..; ' , 4.
•
e ' 1 ,..,:. ,'ltiii•-4,,..,,,,'1:.:.r.,:::ti, , :s'‘, - I ' ' : ..— -.!— i -1 *.: , , • - , .-.1 L • iik,.., t ,
f(f i Y� ^�;
.fir •floi:if i r ;UM, , 1 , . 1 1 1 I..
r •i 4.'°s' a IT'r J �� - LL as •
� y 1. ,.','..:,..,,,i...6',.., 2 #•'''. .
•
lipgihr,fkrh, ,
i.z......J.---...-.;:. ... ,,,,F ...,..,...,..,..
1 le
1 ' 14r.1 r -, ? zir.____. f ,47rtii..A. . . 1 \ , .0, .
1.4{ .^ i� • - ;� _t `- .h 1r
• •�s'w. r. '3r •, re �', 1�.
14,
•
-.,-,- ..,, iji. ' = '2.' - .'',"'t• '' 2,111.• _
xi,
V ,
inc.
\ 4,
--: \,.....,..„,- ,m ••■••14
! ter "� \ ykti ! y f''
•
I 44.'44. 'b'•ati „� SUR1/EY LINE 3 i .�.• ti 1 1 f
i+ P.
S j� 9 '_ F :„Iii,i,
i UT
::-•
•A •,G;/ ;X�3-•te a - is "�r.$ C w 1 �co 900' 950' -+ \` l •
• -
••• r.+ '�4 ! 0441.J - ,� '� "1' Wile11 �15�,r 1/ tea • 1 ,.
'•. �.. �1y��1'}4� eXP ram` 1 I
,,.,.- • w..•r'. ..Stir .a9 ,; /r}� 11 C17".!JmeC3,1�J„ ' 1 1 Ise `5 1., 4. ,�• r '
„tiek
offm
a . V. •,. .. . +10.., . , . . _ ' bjeri '. ' ger 7ain agxEs
,7 •
• .., , ,
, „
,... _•......,, ...:: ,.. , .44, v.t:. .71..(‘ -,. ri- ,. -: -
'' SURVEY LINE`1 • 1 `, 1-'''••3i *;I ' ' Ih
,.,. .s..'.I..,",,, ',-' !,, ;,i.
„1 •+ j "J f �` r{. 9 + . ;1 ' IErf tom,
r ., • r �` di r ., ,. ' a
f fiF.b _ ,_�111 - 4 • `` .• 1 '.. \Sf`�!'i t, •
y .� 1j{}` o f rA;.
' 'P.-11
1. • A .—. 100'� - 1 ... "e • 4 WMM. rr ��, I
°t f � SURVEY LINE 7 �� E9 617 ! ►`� .y S` •I
it sat„ti — • , _ '1-
"'.�.� 1 1 L. .t ! •''
•
'°Ss f 1 �r�!e E
i�i,�, 1, 1 ... a
Y� •A:t a� i♦ ' ', �. }r} L�-A ��.11 1`..l ' .' �I Itt"ire 4
, , t,_
` w1 �'. r ;• Y L2-G 800'� r.
k:-..pir- », 4 ' - ` 3" 11. _ -i4, 4 •1. .: •i r` � r"r .r p }, ,{
, s<•T. a� T ''a t►5 1 • r• J
•*. t i .� r . " , _'�."• . .:.- • ,, A( r M 1^ a` • ,.
,ip!4„,.
•. .
..,
• ,......
.,.
•
• .,..
..,. .. ,
•
. .. ..
...
1r4 .
4 11, • '' L , -k, r ..z,,,,
;et
4.
•
, + •
rit i� -It. 1 'r � ` k yAhi >... .fl' - r r4 1T' Y\ . -. •.
.t ": yrff r •M
Y k r ix �. • I, iiR r S•
:. lc. ;. ,,t,,... .;,-...... 4... ...; ._ •i4-ar „:„.• .6 ik •, i ..'. zt, , ' -4.e ' 4.; , 'NI Z , . igj ,i. ...i• .. ,, ,i .'','V'. .
..,T....',
P. ,r''J...':.vr••-i.k:!`4.I4•iini..i.1\-rpif.,•:I`/..'-i,.1y
,,z..i_'414.f k,
,.1',' .._.,.-
'..t.
•
•..:,-r-,.',-:*. ,r7:9 7.. 1
{ •
I1 a"�, �l
SURVEY LINE 5 �1` r N.
1
PROJECT MANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER
Don Malone
glt ARCAD1S Resistivity Survey Line Locations
DATE DRAWN
MALLINCKRODT INC. 1215.2010 JWIC
0 125 250 500 RALEIGH PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT PROJECT NUMBER FIGURE NUMBER
,.,��� Feet RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA NC107014 0005 00200 1
UVprojects\Mallinc rodt\Ard1ap1FIGURE05_Y2mxd U.WrojectsVNallinckrotl110utput1FINALFIGURES\FIGURE05_v2.pol

ARCADIS
Attachrnent 2
Well Construction
Logs
GrERv HaNlnckrodl{Grourdwele0C107014,00DE{iRMs at Fre Traming/vear4ReportsWlC Parma Evaluation for Tracer StudylTextVPT ecl Evaluation for Tracer Irecdons-3-27-2012-Ikaft.doct

ARCADIS WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG- UNCONSOLIDATED
2.Sft Project Mallinckrodt Well BIA 5
LAND SURFACE
Town/City Raleigh,NC
County Wake State NC
8 inch diameter Well Contractor Certification# 2487
drilled hole
Well casing,
2 inch diameter, Installation Date(s) 3/15/2011
Sch.40 PVC
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger
Backfill
©Grout Portland Cement- Drilling Contractor Parratt Wolff
Bentonite Grout
Drilling Fluid N/A
31 ft*
Development Technique(s)and Date(s)
Bentonite slurry
33 ft* pellets Electric Submersible Pump with Surging,3/15/2011
Fluid Loss During Drilling N/A gallons
35 ft*
■ Water Removed During Development 60 gallons
■
■ Static Depth to Water NM feet below M.P.
■ Well Screen.
■ 2 inch diameter Pumping Depth to Water NM feet below M.P.
• Stainless - 10 slot
■ Steel Pumping Duration 0.5 hours
■
■ Yield >2 gpm Date 3/15/2011
■
■
• II Gravel Pack Specific Capacity NM gpm/ft
NI■
i ©Sand Pack
it •Formation Collaspse Well Purpose Monitoring Well
■
■
■ `
■ 45 ft*
Remarks
• 45 ft'
Measuring Point is
Top of Wet Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
Depth Below Land Surface
NM=Not Measured
Prepared by Josh Frizzell
G:IEm\CommonlField Forms\B1 A&83A.xlsx

RECEIVED
•414 NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD MARS r r11t
' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality AN
-•- ,"" WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION# 2487 Ott
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS FT.Above Land Surface-
Arnold Chapel 'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual)Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
Parratt-Wolff. Inc. a. HELD(gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST TWA
Well Contractor Company Name
5.01 Millstone Drive f. DISINFECTION:Type NIA Amount
Street Address g. WATER ZONES(depth):
H llaborouah NC 27278 Top N/A Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town State rip Code Top Bottom _ Top Bottom
(919 ! 644-2814 Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number Thickness/
2 WELL it/FORMATION: 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT:# Top 0 Bottom 35.0 FL 2" SCh4Q PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT app bia) Top Bottom Ft
SITE WELL ID Alt applicable)B 1 A `3 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring alfMunicipaVPlthfc0 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
IndustrIal/Commercial❑ Agriculhaal p Recovery 0 Injection o Top 0 Bottom 31.0 Ft. Portland Tr6mie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ gist use) Top 31.0 Bottom 33.0 Ft Bentonite Tremie
DATE DRILLED ED 3/15111 Top Bottom - Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: S. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
8801 Capital Boulevard Top 35.0 Bottom 45.0 Ft. 2 in. _.010 in. SS
(Street Name,Number,Comm+oly,8ulxrmidon,Lot No.,Panel,ZIP Code) • Top Bottom Ft In. in.
CITY: Raleigh COUNTY Wake Top Bottom Ft in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC!LAND SETTING (streak appropriate bat)
cSlope pvalley 0Flat QRi� ❑O 10.$AND/GRAVELPACI(:•
LATITUDE 35 53 '705.OD°° -DMS OR 3XJ000OOOCXX DOD 4 Slza MaterialTop 33.0 3c►tttlm r+.j 0 FL Sand
LONGITUDE 7B - 33 • 835A000 -DNS OR 7XJOD000000t DC) Top Bottom -Ft
Latitudellorgilude solace: MPS rliropographic map Top Bottom Ft
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo mac andattached to
this form Knot using GPS) 11.DRILLING TAG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Mallinckrodt Facility 30.0 / 32.0 Gray/white.wet.very dense
Facility Name Fealty tDt#(if applicable) / SAPROLITE
8801 Capital Boulevard /
Street Address m ..
Raleigh NC 27616 /
City or Town State Zip Code /
/
Contact Name /
/
Malang Address /
/
City or Town State Zip Code 12 RE/LARKS:
U
Area code Phone number
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE watt WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
6.WELL DETAILS: -ISA,. 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
•,_i f i HAS BEEN TO THE WELL°mem
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 45j.,0' f 31 II
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO LI s �1
S NA RE OF CERTIF WELL CONTRAG'foR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 30.0 FT. Arnold Chapel
(Use.}.if Above Top of wing) PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Form GW-I b
Submit within 30 days of completion to:Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Rev.2/09
1617 Mall Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone:(919)807r6300

ARCADIS WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG- UNCONSOLIDATED
2.5 ft Project Mallinckrodt Well B3A
L4N0 SURFACE
Town/City Raleigh,NC
County Wake State NC
8 inch diameter Well Contractor Certification# 2487
drilled hole
Well casing,
2 inch diameter, Installation Dates} 3/14/2011-3/15/2011
Sch 40 PVC
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger
Backfill
XQGrout Portland Cement- Drilling Contractor Parratt Wolff
Bentonite Grout
Drilling Fluid N/A
35 ft`
Development Techniques)and Date(s)
Bentonite slurry
37 ft" �X pellets Electric Submersible Pump with Surging,3/15/2011
Fluid Loss During Drilling N/A gallons
40.5 ft'
Water Removed During Development 30 gallons
■
■ Static Depth to Water NM feet below M.P.
Well Screen.
■ 2 inch diameter Pumping Depth to Water NM feet below M.P.
■ Stainless 10 slot
■ Steel Pumping Duration 4 hours
■ Yield 0.5 gpm Date 3/15/2011
■
■
■ Gravel Pack Specific Capacity NM gpmlft
■
©Sand Pack
■ Formation Collaspse Well Purpose Monitoring Well
■
■
■ 50.5 ft"
Remarks
52 ft'
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
Depth Below Land Surface
NM=Not Measured
Prepared by Josh Frizzell
G:VEnvSCommon4Field romis\D1A 8 D3A.xlsx

e,' 4
f'f 1 N
NONRESIDENTIAL ONRESIDE'NT�L WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
i 1 `'
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
, a :4. WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION f# 2487
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0 FT.Above Land Surface'
Arripld Chapel *Top of casing terminated al/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(individual)Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
Parratt-Wolff. Inc. e. YIELD(gpm): N/A_ METHOD OF TEST N/A
Weil Contractor Company Name 501 Millstone Drive f. DISINFECTION:Type N/A Amount
Street Address g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Hillsborough NC 27278 Top N/A Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town State Zip Code Top Bottom Top Bottom
(919 ) 644-2814 Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#: Top 0 Bottom 41.0 Ft. 2" SCh40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(irapplicable) Top Bottom Ft _
SITE WELL ID#(it applicable)B3A t Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring li"Municipal/Public p 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural Q Recovery 0 Injection❑ Top 0 Bottom 33.0 Ft. Portland Tremie
InigationD Other CI (list use) Top 33.0 Bottom 37.0 Ft Bentonite Tremie
DATE DRILLED 3/14-3/15/11 Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
8801 Caoital Boulevard Top 41.0 Bottom 51.0 Ft 2 in. .010 in. SS
(Street Name,Numbers.Communityy,Subdivision,Lot No.,Potosi.Zip Code) Top Bottom Ft in. in. �._--
CITY: Raleigh courrrY Wake Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
°Slope ❑Valley QFlat 0 Ridge °Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 -53 '705.0000 "DMS OR 3x.x3000000ac DD Depth Size Material
Bottom 51.0 Ft #1 Sand
LONGITUDE 78 a 33 • 635.o000 "DMS OR 7x.700000000C DO Top Bottom Ft
Latitude/longitude source: [PPS Vropographic map Top Bottom Ft.
(location of wall must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) 11.DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Mallinckrodt Facility 39.0 / 41.0' ,Light brown.wet.dense.
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 1 SAPROLITE:little silt&gravel
8801 Canital Boulevard /
Street Address I
Raleigh NC 27818 /
City or Town State Zip Code /
_ / •
Contact Name 1
/
Mailing Address /
/
City or Town State Zip Code 12.REMARKS:
U
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS" I DO HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C.WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 51.0` 7Rt}I727ps 1.TOTHEWELL OWNER. 3lDATE
p,Il? _b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES p NO pi/ NATUREOOE CERTI IED WELL CONTRALT�OR�T DA TE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 30.0 FT. Arnold Chapel
(Use+`if Above Top of Casing) PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Form GW-1 b
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Rev.2/09
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone:[phone]

ARCADIS
Attachment 3
Single Well Tracer
Test Analysis Tool
G1ENWdaminc rotll(Grormdwater1 1070140006(IRMs at Fee Training AxeaMe,orts\llIC Permit Evaluation 1pr Tracer StucylTex11Peciect Lealuaton for Tracer 1r*eckns-3-27-2012-Orel docx

Single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
Site/Project#: Mallinckrodt-Raleigh,NC
Well ID: B1aS
Analysis byldate: Kim Heinze,06/29/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
Fill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields. Iterate as necessary.
Goverinq equation
r*tn(C-1) q
a
8
If - (—rri
2 r2 1(2 r ]2 2 2 2 2 2
1 l + KZ 1 4. ) _ a Ki- 1 —(---frl
2 l +(1 —ICK:)11,-3) +(;) } K [(Lri
—1;
Input data
symbol unit Estimate 1 Source
Well diameter r inch 2.00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0.083
Outer well radius r2 feet 0.099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0.333
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube k1 feet/day 4252 i e.from Dorst et al.
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain k2 feet/day 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 2.97 i.e.slug test result on 5/16/2011
Estimation of alpha
First Term under fraction bar - 1 77 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0.14 Low High
alpha • - 4.19 i 0.000 1 0.01
Estimation of qwl qa Transport Velocity(ft/day)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day 0.0130 31.0557 0 3106 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 feet/day 0.0012 2.8667 0 0287 Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve qa 1 feet/day 0 0031
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) qa 2 feet/day 0 0003 Transport Velocity(ft/yr)
11335 3 113 4 Upper Section of Curve
1046 3 10 5 Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of 1

B1a5
1.0 f
►
Field data
o ►
W ► --- Fitting curve -
7-
Upper Section
W ►
► ——— Fitting curve -
Lower Section
O
ra
a)
C 0.1 -
O ►
u ►
u ►
Io ►
aA ►
N
R ►
L ►
+�O
L
►
►
0.0 1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)

!Single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
Site/Project#: INallinckrodt-Raleigh,NC
Well ID: B3aD
Analysis by/date: Krm Heinze,06/29/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
Fill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields.Iterate as necessary.
Goverinq equation
r*1n{C-I) q N,
q = q
4! p =
a
a =_
8
z 3 ^2 � 2 - 2(1 + K). i +(_rrl ) + K- 1 - i +(1 - K ) (rrt + r ) + K +_ rr11 —(rr2)
Input data
symbol. • unit Estimate f Source
Well diameter r inch 2.00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0 083
Outer well radius r2 feet 0.099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0.333
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube Ic1 feetlday 4252 i.e.from Dorst et al.
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain k2 feet/day 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 0.05 i.e.slug test result on 5/16/2011
_Estimation of alpha
First Term under fraction bar - 1 72 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0 15 Low High
alpha • - 4 29 I 0 000 I 0 01 1
Estimation of qw/qa Transport Velocity(fVday)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day 0.0036 8.3927 0 0839 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 feet/day 0.0019 4.4295 0 0443 Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve qa 1 feet/day 0.0008
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) qa 2 feet/day 0.0004 Transport Velocity(ft/yr)
3063 3 30.6 Upper Section of Curve
1616 8 16.2 Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of 1

f
B 3 a D
1.0 1_
\
` —41—Field data
W `\ --- Fitting curve -
O \ Upper Section
W �w� _
0 �wk.� ——— Fitting curve -
•
Lower Section
C
♦ ..\ .
T.
•
C \• ��+.
a \• �J ♦ �`
C0.1 - •`\ "► _
U \ - `ram ;
L \
10 \
L S. •
'Q
QJ ♦
N \
•ru `\
C S.
L S.
o `\
Z `
\
♦
•
•
•
•
•
•
0.0 - S.
.'
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)

single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
Site/Project#: Mallinckrodt-Raleigh, NC
Well ID: FT-1S
Analysis by/date: Kim Heinze,06129/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
Fill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields Iterate as necessary.
Goverinq equation
r*1n4C-1) q "'
g„, _ 4t q u =
a
8
a . _ _
2 2 i 2 2 .,2 2
K2 � 4. (—v2� Kt (r2 ( K.,)11.F3 1 r3 Kt (r3) - 13.)
Input data
symbol unit _Estimate'ISource
Well diameter r inch 2.00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0 083
Outer well radius r2 feet 0.099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0 417
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube k1 feet/day 4252 i.e.from Dorst et al.
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain k2 feet/day 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 1.30 i.e.well broken,so estimated K based on slug test result from well Ba3D on 5/16/2011
Estimation of alpha
First Term under fraction bar - 1.74 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0 10 Low High
alpha • - 4.35 I 0 000 I 0 01
Estimation of awl as Transport Velocity(ft/day)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day 0 0015 3.3359 0.0334 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 feet/day 0.0004 0.9893 0.9099 Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve qa 1 feet/day 0.0003
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) qa 2 feet/day 0 0001 Transport Velocity(ft/yr)
1217.6 122 Upper Section of Curve
t 361 1 3 6 Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of I

FT-1S
1.0
`... —0—-Field data
O `.
W .
› `.` --- Fittingcurve-
W `..` Upper Section
-- `.i ——— Fitting curve
c -- `. Lower Section
�_+ —-
fp L -`.----
C
CIJ v �.`
C
O %
V
L
U ,.
V .
co �.
L
a; .
pa
.
E .
O ,
z `
0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)

'Single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
Site/Project#: Mallinckrodt-Raleigh,NC
Well ID: FT-2D
Analysis by/date: Kim Heinze,06/29/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
Fill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields.Iterate as necessary.
Goverinq equation
r*1n(C-1 q N,
9. = 41 qa
cx
a :_ _
K3+ rt 2 K2 2 rK3strZ}I{2 KZ rt rl{p2 r2 2
1 1 + K7 � 1 + r2 { K1 � T(-1.1
r�� +1 1 —K2� p3 L ` Y9 f + ICI (r3/ — r3
Input data
symbol unit Estimate 1 Source
Well diameter r inch 2.00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0.083
Outer well radius r2 _ feet 0.099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0 271
r
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube k1 feet/day 4252 i.e.from Dorst et al,
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain k2 feeVday 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 5 39 i.e.slug test result on 5/16/2011
Estimation of alpha
First Term under fraction bar - 1 81 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0 20 Low High
alpha • - 3 98 [ 0 000 I 0 01 I
Estimation of ow/ca Transport Velocity(ft/day)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day 0.0070 17.6 0 18 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 . feet/day - - - Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve qa 1 feet/day 0.0018
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) qa 2 feet/day - Transport Velocity(ft/yr)
6418 64 Upper Section of Curve
Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of 1

FT-2 D
1.000 4
—r—Field data
0 ---- Fitting curve-
•.� Upper Section
W 1,
0
C 0.100 - . . -- �*►%
,� -- -..., -- `°., - - -
')w
++ . .
C
a) 1.
U __ i%
0
U
W ..
v V .s
r.2 ..♦
1- 0.010 - ...
-a
a
Ni
to
z
0.001
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (days)

'Single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
'Site/Project#: Mailinckrodt-Raleigh, NC
Well ID: PP-1 S
Analysis by/date: Kim Heinze,06/29/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
fiill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields. Iterate as necessary.
Goverinq equation
r*1n(C-l) q
qw . 4t q Q = "'
a
a :_
8
2 • 2 2 2 (( 2
1 + K2il
} 2) + K1 t - r2) + ( K )-2) r) +(r3) { KF + (.--ri)�� — r3�
Input data
symbol unit Estimate 1 Source
Well diameter r inch 2.00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0.083
Outer well radius r2 feet 0.099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0.417
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube k1 feet/day 4252 i.e.from Dorst et al,
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain _ k2 feet/day 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 3 15 i.e.slug test result on 5/16/2011
Estimation of alpha
First Term under fraction bar - 1 77 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0 10 _ I ow High
alpha - 4 28 I 0 000 I 1
0.01
Estimation of awl as Transport Velocity(ft/day)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day, 0 1200 281 2.8 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 feet/day , - - - Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve - qa 1 feet/day 0.0281
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) _ qa 2 _ feet/day - Transport Velocity(ftlyr)
r 102420 1024 Upper Section of Curve
Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of 1

PP-1S
1.00
Field data
-- Fitting curve-
ILI
Upper Section
w
O
at
= 0.10 -
O
V
L
U
CD
L
U
N
To
E
16
Z
0.01 t-
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)

'Single Well Tracer Test Analysis Tool
SitelProject#: Mallinckrodt-Raleigh,NC
Well ID: PP-3S
Analysis by/date: Kim Heinze,06/29/11
Test Date: 5/16/2011
Directions
Fill in the BLUE fields,the tool will compute values in GREEN fields.Iterate as necessary.
Goverine equation
r*ln(C-1) q
4w. = 4t qQ
CC
« :s
8
( 2 t 2— 2 . 2 2 2
f l K32 [t I K2 I — xl j
II ��I — Ft +EE(r2 + K2 + 1;3
rl 12rli
t K2 I,"J 4- Kt r2 K2A I, )2
f r3 Kt ) —)rs!
Input data
symbol unit Estimate 1 Source
Well diameter r inch 2 00
Inner well radius r1 feet 0.083
Outer well radius r2 feet 0 099
Bore hole radius r3 feet 0.417
Hydraulic conductivity filter tube k1 feet/day 4252 i.e.from Dorst et al.
Hydraulic conductivity filter grain k2 feet/day 99 i.e.from lab data at another site
Hydraulic conductivity formation k3 feet/day 8 57 i.e.slug test result on 5/16/2011
Estimation of alpha _
First Term under fraction bar 1.86 Mobile Porosity Estimates
Second Term under fraction bar - 0.10 Low High
alpha • - 4.08 I 0 000 I 0 01 1
Estimation of wa 1 as Transport Velocity(ft/day)
Groundwater flux in the well-upper section of curve qw 1 feet/day 0 0140 34.2852 0 3429 Upper Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the well-lower section of curve(if applicable) qw 2 feet/day - - - Lower Section of Curve
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-upper section of curve qa 1 feet/day 0 0034
Groundwater flux in the aquifer-lower section of curve(if applicable) qa 2 feel/day - Transport Velocityjftlyr)
12514 1 125 1 Upper Section of Curve
- - Lower Section of Curve
Page 1 of 1

PP-3S
1.00
-+-•Field data
-u ! ---- Fitting curve -
>- Upper Section
W
>-
C
0
IP
to
L
C
C 0.10 -
O
u
16
U
co
I`L
a)
N
f0
E
L
O
z
0.01 --
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)

ARCADIS
Attachment 4
Tracer Test
Laboratory Analytical
Report
Gt{MAIAeiNntluod{GrounduaterANC107414.0006 QRMs at Fre Training AreajlReportslUlC Pemtil Evaluator for Tracer StudytTexProject Evaluation for Tracer Injectiore-t-27-2012-Dra0.doox

tit
GROUND
LABORATORY 1572Aley Lane•Protein,MO 65733•[phone]•fax[phone]•abntactOo aekimderg)oundlab.com
Certificate of Analysis
Date of certificate: March 8,2012 Samples collected by: ARCADIS
Client: ARC'ADIS-US Date Samples Shipped: February 27,2012
Project: Mallinckrodt Tracer Testing Date Samples Rec'd at OUL: February 28,2012
Project Number: NCI07014.0005 Date Analyzed by OUL: March 6,2012.
Contact Person: Alan Pinnix([e-mail]) Included with certificate of analysis: Table of
Mailing address: 801 Corporate Center Drive,Suite 300 results and copy of sample collection data sheet
Raleigh NC 27607
Results for water samples analyzed for the presence of fluorescein dye.
Peak wavelengths are reported in nanometers(am);dye concentrations are reported in parts per billion(ppb).
OUL Station Station Name Dateffime Fluorescein Results
1 Number Number Collected Peak(nm) Cone.(ppb)
V5723 I BIAS _ . 2123/12 0940 508.5 28.6
V5724 2 B3aD 2/23/121005 ND
V5725 3 FT-2D ,2/23/12 1025 ND
{_I V5726 4 FT-IS 2/23/12 1125 , 508.5 266
V5727 5 0S-3 2/23/121225 512.2** 0.094
V5728 6 0S-12D 2/23/121435 ND
j I V5729 7 OS-12B • 2/23/12I500 ND
V5730 _ 8 PP-18D •2/23/121540 ND •
V5731 9 PP-20D 2/23/121605 ND
V5732 IO PP-IS 2/23/121630 508.4 8.53
V5733 II PP-3S 223/121715 509.4 3.58
Note: Dye concentrations are based upon standards used at the OUL. The standard concentrations are based upon the as
Li sold weight of the dye that the OUL uses.if the client is not using OUL dyes,the client should provide the OUL
with a sample of the dye to compare to the OUL dyes.
Footnotes: ND=No dye detected
-A fluorescence peak is present that does not meet all the criteria for this dye. However,it has been calculated as a
positive dye result.
1 I Thomas.1.Aley,PHG and RG
.7.rro_4;;Free....
t:ldocslcoalARCADIS Mallinckmdt NC 06.xls
oft

OZARK UNDERGROUND LABORATORY, INC.
1572 Aley Lane Protem,MO 65733 [phone] fax[phone] email:[e-mail]
SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA SHEET for FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS
Project: CovidienfMallinckrodt Week No: NA pies Collected y: ARCADIS
Samples Shipped By:a -( -Gra Z/Z /t. Samples Received By: pie)0 e'i .cL 1 (V—
Date Samples Shipped: 02/27/2012 Date Samples Received: 2_1 Jf Time Samples Received: ,f L1, Return Cooler? Yes ® No .
Bill to: ARCADIS Send Results to: A1an.Pinnixaarcadls-us.com,donaId.malone(karcadis-us.com
Analyze for: X Fluorescein ❑ Eosine ❑ Rhodamine WT ❑ Other Ship cooler to: 801 Corporate Center Dr.,Ste 300,Raleigh,NC 27607
Are these samples from a mine? ❑yes X no
OUL Please indicate stations where dye was visible in the field OUL
use only use only
for field technician use- use black ink only
#CHAR LAB STATION STATION NAME PLACED COLLECTED N
REC'D NUMBER NUMBER WATER
U�czkr 1-4 Numbers DATE TIME DATE TIME REC'D ('Y
r7 .3 i 8Ia.5 `
0 V5
L�jl�. a�a �
a V57L+ z 8.3ap o
r
V5T)5 3 L�ctS
-FT-Z� " 1023 I
o _V5'7. d0 if -FT-is It u Z5 C
o V57j-7 S os-S _ « 'Lag 1
_ 0 .V51 -8 _ G as-12..D 0 14?a5 I
V57J-Q 4 _ O-126 _ to lsmp I
_ o V57'io 8 _ PP- IS o It isgo i
0 V573 i 1 .PP-zQl `' Itoos _
0 V5'?3a to PP- is lta3a i
V5733 it , PP- 3S` u u -+s
( }
COMMENTS
This sheet filled out by OUL staff?Yes ❑ No x Charts for samples on ts page proofed by OUL: a)
OUL OUL Project No. 10' Date Analyzed: Analyzed By: Gii�- CJteL. :
Page 1 of 1 (SOL
OZARK UNDERGROUND LABORATORY,INC.