Complete File - Historical_20171231 (6)

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
March 4, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. J. Frank Harrison, III
Meadow Wood Farms, LLC
Post Office Box 31487
Charlotte, North Carolina 28231-1487
RE: Approval to Impound
Meadow Wood Farms Dam
Union County
UNION-089-L
Dear Mr. Harrison:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
This concerns the subject dam recently constructed pursuant to issuance of an Approval to
Construct on November 6, 2002, Approval to Construct - Addendum 1 on July 30, 2003 and
Approval to Construct - Addendum 2 on August 17, 2004 as required by the Dam Safety Law of
1967. Record Drawings and the engineer's certification were received on November 18, 2004.
Mr. Clay E. Sams, PE, certified the dam. Also, Check No. 7293 in the amount of $4739.23
serving as the additional application -processing fee was received on February 7, 2005.
Land Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office made an inspection of this dam on
December 21, 2004. The dam was found to be in general conformance with the approved plans
and specifications, and you may impound water subject to the following stipulation:
It is recommended that the inspection program outlined in the Operation.& Maintenance
Plan of Appendix 6 include inspection of the areas of seepage.
The Land Quality Section staff will make periodic inspections of this dam to assure that the dam
is being maintained in good operating condition. These inspections, however, will be relatively
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 -919-733-4574 / FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Harrison
March 4, 2005
Page 2 of 2
infrequent. It is advised that you closely inspect and monitor your dam, and that you notify your
engineer and the Division. of Land Resources if you see or suspect any problems concerning its
safety.
Sincerely,
-e 'K, �-
Maxwell R. Fowles, PE
State Dam Safety Engineer
MRF/TVI
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, PE - Regional Engineer
Mr. Clay E. Sams, PE
Mr. D. Rex Gleason PE Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mr. Larry Snyder

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
February 7, 2005 WIsiUN OF LARD) RESM11epili.
LAND QUALITY 5EUiON
f
Mr. Russell G. Colbath, PE ' F� 200Y
.
Water Resources Director
City of Monroe i5,'tsr
'r J ir4!i R I/P
Post Office Box 69 N
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
RE: Approval of Repairs
Lake Twitty Dam
State I.D. UNION-012
Dear Mr. Colbath:
This letter concerns the subject dam, which is located on Stewarts Creek in Union County and
was repaired pursuant to an Approval to Repair issued on December 11, 2002 as required by the
Dam Safety Law of 1967. The engineer's certification and record drawings were submitted
under cover letter dated January 28, 2004 and. received by the Mooresville Regional Office on
February 2, 2004. At the request of your office, inspection of the dam was postponed until the
summer of 2004, but heavy rains delayed the inspection until the fall of 2004. The inspection by
Land Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office on September 29, 2004 found that
the record drawings were incomplete. These findings were discussed with the engineer -of -record
on October 18, 2004 and revised record drawings were submitted under cover letter dated
November 1, 2004 and received by the Mooresville Regional Office on November 3, 2004.
Additional information was received on December 9, 2004.
The engineer's certification, dated January 28, 2004 indicated that the replacement of the 30-inch
mud valve had not been completed, but had been scheduled for the summer of 2004. However, it
is our understanding that the City of Monroe would like to abandon the plans for replacement of
the valve. Although it is generally undesirable to have a continuously pressurized conduit
penetrating the dam, the original construction drawings indicate that the pipe is completely
encased within the concrete portion of the dam. As.a result, it is unlikely that the current
configuration threatens the safety of the dam. Therefore, the repairs are approved as completed
and shown on the record drawings received November 3, 2004.
Geological Survey • Land Quality - Geodetic Survey
Division of Land Resources • 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North' Carolina 27699-1612
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 -
919-733-38331 FAX: [phone] Internet: www.dlr.enr. state.nc.us/dlr.htm
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Colbath
February 7, 2005.
Page 2
You are encouraged to update your Emergency Action Plan at least annually. If we may be of
assistance, contact Mr. Clinton Cook, PE in the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] .
or Mr. Maxwell Fowler, PE in the Central Office at [phone].
;Sirely, D. Simons, PG, PE
tor and State Geologist
7DS/MRF/COC
cc: Mr. Anthony D. Greiner, PE
Mr. George L. Eller, PE
Mr. Donald L. Cordell, PE
Mr. G. Douglas Miller, PE
Mr. Clinton O. C. Cook, PE
Regional -Water Quality Supervigor-or_

Nov. 11,. 2004
Mr. John Lesly
Division of Water Quality _
919 North Main :Street .°
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Lesley;
BROOKS
FOOD GROUP
Lj
RECF I
/
DEv � / 2004
NC,DEPT: OF EMMOR+ FAENfi
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
€' 00.RESVILLE RFSIOM OFFICE
This is a follow to the conversation I had today with Ms. Karen Patterson of
your Response Center. As today is a Holiday I was unable to communicate
directly. - -
At approximately 9:00 AM today we had a spill incident in our parking lot.
While a truck was unloading soybean oil to our tank, a valve cap on the
truck came off and allowed approximately 2200 gallons of that oil to spill
into the parking lot. The oil was immediately contained on the asphalt/grass
and gravel lot by diking and applying absorbent booms. None of the oil left
the site or was: allowed to enter a storm drain or other waterway.
At,approximately 11:00 Am Mr. James Farley of Containment Control Inc.
arrived on site, surveyed the situation and ordered personnel and equipment
to abate the spill. The asphalt will be chemically cleaned using a pressure
washer and the residual collected. The grass and gravel will be scraped up
with a bulldozer down to a level that shows no residue and disposed of
properly.
Please let me know if you require any further information.
Sincerely,
<3
John C. Blackford
Maintenance Manager
Q0:ISZi,,rsonreet, Monroe, NC 284 • ph: 704.289.8300 0 www.brooksfoodgrotip.com

rvucuaci r. nanny, vuvciuur
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
OT
co �
Mr. Jim McClain, President
Carolina Concrete, Inc.
1316 Indian Trail-Waxhaw Road
Mathews, N.C. 28105
Dear Mr. McClain:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 3, 2004
Subject: Carolina Concrete, Inc.
Case No. PC-2003-0321
Violations ofNPDES Permit and
N.C. Water Quality Standards
Union County, N.C.
On November 1 ", 2004, Mr. Eddie Weatherman with Carolina Concrete, Inc., met with
Messrs. Rex Gleason and Samar Bou-Ghazale of this office to discuss the civil penalty
assessment and continuing violation's at the Carolina Concrete facility in Matthews, N.C.
During this meeting Mr. Weatherman agreed to the following:
1- Carolina Concrete Inc., will remove deposited concrete from the unnamed
tributary to Davis Mine Creek.
2- Carolina Concrete Inc., will divert the wastewater from the truck rinsing area
into the settling pond.
It was also agreed that completion of the above items will be accomplished by December
31, 2004.
At the meeting Mr. Weatherman asked if the penalty of $8,105.17 ($7,800.00 plus
$305.17 in enforcement costs) assessed on January 13, 2004 could be reduced due to the
anticipated expenses associated with the stream cleanup. It was agreed that the penalty could be
reduced by 20 percent provided that Carolina Concrete agree to immediately implement the
aforementioned actions. Payment of the penalty totaling $6545.17 ($7,800 X 80% = $6240 plus
$305.17 in enforcements costs) should be remitted as soon as possible to close out the subject
case.
Subsequent to completion of the stream cleanup, this office will conduct a follow-up
inspection to assure compliance. Failure to correct the noted problems at Carolina Concrete will
NooletllCarOlina
lvlltllCll4
N.C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

result in fitrther recommendations for enforcement for any continuing .violations.
If you have any, questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazale
or me at this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Cc: Mr. Eddie Weatherman, Carolina Concrete, Inc.
Bob Sledge, DWQ
SBG

F WA-r Michael F. Easley, Governor
�� TQ William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
G� 1� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(� t
r J Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
(a f\ Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 8, 2004,l-W, ®FF9Ce
Jack M. Hamby, Mayor
317 N. Borne Street
Waxhaw, North Carolina 28173
Subject: NPDES Application �A MIN
Town of Waxhaw
Additional Information Request
Dear Mr. Hamby:
After a review of your permit application materials I found that with changes to Section 7,
there is sufficient content to continue with the review and drafting of your permit.
Appendix A. BMPs and Measurable Goals for Public Involvement. BMPs for Public
Involvement and Pat t�icipafion Program should provide opportunities for the public to participate
in program implementation (i.e., volunteer program / community involvement: organize and
implement a volunteer stormwater related program designed to promote ongoing citizen
participation).
Appendix A. BMPs and Measurable Goals for Illicit Discharge Detection and
Elimination. There is no BMP for dry weather flow (i.e., implement inspection program to detect
dry weather flows at system outfalls and establish procedures for tracing the sources of illicit
discharges).
Appendix A. BMPs and Measurable Goals for Illicit Discharge Detection and
Elimination. There is no BMP for public reporting (i.e., establish reporting mechanism for the
public to report illicit discharges).
Appendix A. BMPs and Measurable Goals for Pollution Prevention and Good
Housekeeping. The BMP for staff training should include training on good housekeeping
procedures as well (i.e., The town will develop training materials and educate all employees in
pollution prevention technique and good housekeeping procedures).
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
1-877

Appendix A. BMPs and Measurable Goals for Pollution Prevention and Good
Housekeeping. Add BMP for review of regulated industrial activities (i.e., conduct annual
review of stormwater pollution prevention plans).
Please provide the requested information by Friday, August 6, 2004. If you have any
questions about this request don't hesitate to contact me at [phone], ext. 545.
Sincerely,
Mike Randall
Environmental Engineer
cc: Stormwater and General Permits Unit
(MooresviIIeTRegional=Office

W A r�. Michael F. Easley, Governor
O 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1 QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources \O
Vj 7 Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
- d d Division of Water Quality
0 Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 20, 2004
5366 aCENED
Mr. Kyle Bilafer
RE 0"";
Tyson Foods, Inc. MAY 2 5 2004
PO Box 965 NC DEPT. OF EI\1i/1RONNIENT
Monroe, NC 28112- AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection P40ORESliILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Dear Mr. Bilafer:
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on May 11, 2004 by Mr. David
Livingston. Where deficiencies are cited in this report, a response is required as well as for
all lettered comments and/or recommendations. Within thirty days of receipt, please supply
this office with a written item for item description of how these deficiencies, comments
and/or recommendations were corrected. If the deficiencies cited in the enclosed report are
not corrected, enforcement actions will be recommended. For certification maintenance,
your laboratory must continue to carry out the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 2H
.0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this
office. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an
electronic copy of this report by email, or if you have questions or need additional
information please contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: David Livingston
Mooresville Regional Office
NCDENR
C. Division of Water Quality Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623 [phone]
FAX: [phone]

LABORATORY
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE NO:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
OF INSPECTION:
'ALUATOR:
On -Site Inspection Report
Tyson Foods, Inc.
P. O. Box 965
Monroe, NC 28112
#5366
5/11 /04
Field Initial
David G. Livingston
CAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED:
INTRODUCTION:
Mr. Kyle Bilafer and Ms. Anita Jordan
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H
.0800 for the analysis of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory is spacious and well equipped. All facilities and equipment are well maintained.
Records are well kept and most data looked good. Some further quality control procedures need
to be implemented.
III. DEFICIENCIES, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
GENERAL
(A) COMMENT: Not all of the laboratory benchsheets were signed or initialed by the analyst.
REQUIREMENT: The analyst must sign or initial all benchsheets and log books.
am
(B) COMMENT: The laboratory is calibrating the pH meter but not documenting the process
appropriately.
RECOMMENDATION: Document the true value of the calibration buffers and check buffer along
with the actual value found on every analysis day. The pH check. buffer (pH 7 buffer) must read
within +/- 0.1 pH units for the instrument to be considered calibrated.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
This consisted of comparing data with the values obtained on laboratory bench worksheets.

Page 2
Tyson Foods, Inc. #5366
CONCLUSIONS:
i
Correcting the above cited comments and implementing the. requirements/recommend,
will help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements. Please res�
to the le
ttered comments. I
I
Report prepared by: David G. Livingston Date: 5/12/04

T He DEPT. OF SNIRG ek L
� 1, � ,.� • ��'�.;�`s i� * �';x ;s;�;g�.
ATAI,­eAn-A Mission FEB 3 2004
i
Division of Water Quality January 30, 2004
Mr. John Lesley
j 919 N. Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Report on fuel spill
Dear Mr. Lesley,
On January 28, 2004 at approximately 10:30am, Mr. John Benner pulled his F-350 Ford
pick up truck into the parking lot at the Language Service Center building at JAARS Inc.
located at 7406 JAARS Rd. Waxhaw, N.C. 28173. John parked his vehicle at the LSC
parking lot on the west side of the building. John proceeded into the LSC building to start
his day. Within a few minutes another employee noticed that fuel was leaking from an
auxiliary fuel container in the back of John's truck.
I was notified of the spill within minutes. Union County volunteer Fire Department
personnel who work at the LSC building were notified, and were on the scene within 5
minutes. The -spill was stopped and contained within a few minutes. The fuel on the
parking lot was `quickly cleaned up with oil dry absorbent. I would estimate 2 to 3 gallons
of fuel spilled onto the asphalt lot. There is a storm drain located within 25 ft. of the spill
area. The fireman placed absorbent tubes at the closest access point below the drain grate
within 250 ft of the spill. The lot was cleaned first with the oil dry and then with a fire
hose and small amounts of residue material were absorbed by the tubes. We feel
confident that the residual fuel was contained and it presents no environmental issues
resulting from this minor spill.
The absorbent tubes were disposed of by Circle Environmental Inc. located in Lancaster,
SC. The certificate of disposal is attached.
Sincerely,
Kirk Flanegan
Director of Operations,
JAARS Inc.
Box 248, Waxhaw, North Carolina 28173-0248 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Serving Wycliffe Bible Translators and the Summer Institute of Linguistics
i

r
0
CERTIFICATUO-F
INCINERATION
Circle Environmental, The undersigned certifies that
the waste described below lias,:,been incinerated in accordance with U. S.
EPA and State W�
ent Regulations.
NArh w j AC
Generator /:Location
Date
Materials Dropped. Off - .
Description
Circle Environmental
.236 Storage. Road I Lancaster, S.C. 29720
1-800-23074143 / Fax :[phone]
EPA ID.Number SCR000005140
73

t
.� �-

OG ;�I A. 1 �A Michael F_ Easlcc. Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i— Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
—i Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Deputy Director
Division of Rater Quality
January 22, 2004
Mr. James Moms and Mrs. Emma Morris
c% Emma Boyce
Post Office Box 212
Matthews, North Carolina 28104
Subject: Heating Oil Discharge from
Leaking Above Ground Storage Tank
Indian Trial Residence
Street Address Unknown
Union County, N.C.
Dear Ms. Boyce:
This office was referred a complaint by the Division's Groundwater Section (on January 15, 2004)
regarding a leaking above ground storage tank (AST) at an abandoned house in Indian Trial, N.C. The
property owners were identified,as James and Emma Morris. This office was unable to contact the owners
via telephone. If an oil discharge has occurred or continues to occur on this property, the discharge must be
ceased immediately. In addition, the contaminated soil must be properly removed and disposed, with all
affected areas being restored as nearly as may be to the conditions prior to the discharge. The discharge of.
oil and/or the failure to immediately cease the discharge and properly clean up the affected areas can subject
the responsible party to civil penalties of up to $5,000.00 per violation, per day. Penalties could also be
assessed for the responsible parry's .failure to report the discharge to this office.
It is requested that you (as an owner) respond, in writing, to this letter, indicating the actions taken
to cease .the discharge and the actions taken to cleanup and dispose of the contaminated soil. Please address
your response to Mr. Wes Bell by no later than February 11. 2004.
Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at [phone].
Sincerely, !
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water_ Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Union County Health Department
NorrhCarolina �,��
,%Vatl[rallt,� NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality,. Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville WC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

�oF warF,�Q
� r
Mr. Andrew Adams, Owner
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Dear Mr. Adams:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENSta
T to of North Carolina
AND NATi.IRff- RE�ilrpss, Jr., Secretary
L10i)�{ artment of EnviroMedp ta�,�Jatural Resources
W. Klin1ek, P.E., Director
"s Division of Water Quality
December 22, 2003
DEC 3 C 2003
_ BSI
Subject: Return of NPDES Permit Application
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
WWTP Permit Request
NPDES No. NCO087858
Return No. 2206
Union County
The Division of Water Quality received Equipment & Supply, Incorporated's application for
a discharge permit on September 26, 2003, as submitted by your consultants, Eagle Engineering,
Incorporated. The application is lacking complete information and is being returned to your
consulting engineer. Although much information was included with the application, the initial
review of the project indicates that the information listed below must be provided before a permit
can be developed for the project. The Division of Water Quality has been under increased scrutiny
with regard to new applications for discharges into waters of the state, and requests that you and
your consultant provide greater documentation and justification for the proposed permit.
The following items need to be revised or. clarified before the Division may proceed forward
with the project:
Connection to .POTW. Please explain the statement regarding the cadmium level. If
cadmium data is available for the contaminated groundwater, please provide the data (only
data regarding organics was found in the document). Also, please provide the City of
Monroe Draft Flow Acceptance Permit, it did not appear to be in the document. Please
provide information from the City regarding costs, because the synopsis in Part II is
somewhat confusing. In the details of the costs for connection, clarification is needed
regarding the recurring costs. Specifically, please provide documentation from the City
that these are recurring costs - "Wastewater Availability Fee" and "Service Connection
Charge", (Items 10 and 11 of the Preliminary Costs). Also, please provide documentation
from the City regarding overall sewer rates and charges (as outlined in Items 12 - 14 of the
Preliminary Costs). Sources for cost estimates on equipment should be stated in the
document (if costs are not readily available, please state if estimates are based on similar
work with similar projects). Why are utility costs for connection to the City more expensive
than operation of the treatment system and direct discharge to surface water? Does the
City require that the remediated groundwater be treated or can the contaminated
groundwater be pumped and discharged to the City directly?
2. Land -based Disposal. Please have a Licensed Soils Scientist evaluate the potential for
land -based disposal (spray or drip irrigation). It is unclear from the documentation
provided if land -based disposal is an option (the focus in the document seemed to be
subsurface disposal). Loading rates should be provided by the soil scientist (if this can be
done based on the information already available in conjunction with the County Soils
Report, that will be acceptable). As stated in the Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Guidance, if insufficient land is available, determine if any additional land could be
acquired.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
FAX [phone]
On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/

Mr. Adams
Page 2
Even if insufficient. land is available, the cost of the alternative (including total land cost
necessary for the land -based disposal option) should be provided in the document. This
requires the amount of wettable acres provided by the soil scientist. Land costs as
estimated by a real estate agency should be documented and provided. If land cannot be
acquired - this should be explained in the EAA.
Two copies of the document are being returned to :your consultant (and one copy will be retained
in the NP,DES Unit). You and/or your consultants may contact me at [phone], ext. 510
should you have further questions regarding the project. If this document is modified and
resubmitted within the next six months, no additional application fee will be required.
Sincerely,
Susan A. Wilson, P.E.
NPDES Unit
cc: C-M oresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES file
Jeremia S. Murphy, EJ. (w/two documents)
Eagle Engineering
310 Indian Trail - Fairview Road
Indian Trail, NC 28079

�OF WATF9Q
Michael F. Easley, Governor
0
7
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Y
Alan W. Klimeck, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 28, 2003
Town of Wingate
Post Office Box 367
Wingate NC 28174
Subject: Incomplete/ Inadequate Engineering Certification
Glencroft Subdivision, Phase 1
Permit Number WQ0021355
Union County
Dear Dryw Blanchard:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit can not accept the submitted engineering certification for the
subject permit due to the following reasons:
The Division no longer accepts typed certification letters. Only the approved Engineering
Certification Form provided as the last page in the issued permit is accepted.
® Record drawings are not present.
Pump station calculations are not present. These are required upon completion of all projects
issued a permit through the Division's fast track process.
Project changes are not evident in the record drawings or provided in written form nor is there
any indication that the project was completed with minimal changes that are in conformance with
all statutes, regulations and our Minimum Design Criteria (if applicable).
Partial or full certification is not indicated on the Engineering Certification Form or record
drawings.
PE seal, signature or date is missing from the Engineering Certification Form, record drawings
and/or pump station calculations (if applicable).
The record drawings do not show all of the required information (i.e. plan/profile of all sewer
lines, all treatment component locations and sizes, site map, etc.).
Inspection frequency is not specified on the Engineering Certification Form.
Other:
Please make the appropriate corrections and resubmit the entire engineering certification package
with a copy of this letter. Receipt of engineering certifications in no way absolves the Permittee's
responsibility to ensure the project meets all statutes, regulations and design criteria associated with the
project. If you have any question regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 919-733-5083,
extension 502.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood \\\\\\
Environmental Engineer
cc: Mooresville Regional Office; Water -Quality Sectionz'
ISTeighborhood Designs, 2649 Brekonridge Centre Drive , Monroe NC 28110
Central Files - WQ0021355
lie ®Epp. ar, , _e , �` •.
ANnnaa-..__.
T C
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu[j
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Town of Marshville
Mayor Larry Smith Jr.
Mayor Pro Tenn Scott Mangum
Council Member Margaret Bivens
Council (Member Dora Bridget
Council Member Denise Whitley
Council Member Franklin D. Deese
� wvi4
August 4, 2003
Town Administrator Carl Webber
Park Director_lim Chaffin
Chief of Police Mike Gaddv
Public Works Director Bivens Steele
Tax Collector Carolvn I laigler
Town Clerk Scott Howard
U:,+,.u/'�s. or- 1°�INIROi'L�>ii�ai�Tya
AUG 0 6 9-003
Mr. Reynaldo S. Barron
Union County Environmental Health
i 500 N. Main St. Suite 36
Monroe, NC 281 I "l't
1 fM•,
Via facsimile 704-283-382.5
Dear Mr. Barron:
I am in receipt of your letter of July 31, 2003 regarding your July 23, 2003 response to a report of a sewer
spill east of the Food Lion Shopping center on US 74 in Marshville. Mr. Bivens Steele made me aware of
Your phone conversation of July 28, 2003 but indicated that you had only reported evidence of past spills.
Neither Mr., Steele nor 1. were aware of any report of"leakage from one union in the sewer line itself'
until otii August 4, 200Y receipt of your letter.
I have directed-Mr. Steele to immediately inspect all high priority aerial sewer lines in -the vicinity of the
Food Lion Shopping Center on US 74 in Marshville. I would like for you to visit with us in Marshville so
that we may jointly inspect this area and you can point out any deficiencies you observe and / or the
location of any deficiencies you observed previously.
We will be meeting with our consulting engineering firm regarding previous issues involving this area of
our sewer collection system at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday August 5, 2003 here at the Marshville Town Hall
and invite you to join us. I am faxing this letter to you for your ' mediate notification.
Sincere
Cc: Bivens Steele
Sonja Williams
Mooresville Regi'onal'Offce
D.E.N.R.
919„North.Main Street
Mo' oresvilleNC, 28115
Carl Webber
Town Administrator
201 %Vc,t .Main titrrrt .Marshville North C,nolina 2ti10,
I'hunc I0}-62I-2;1 Fax [phone] cnriil: m.irshyillcrudasia.net

Foodsk�a,�T_ Signature
2701 SIMPSON STREET • MONROE, NC 28112
[phone]
August 1, 2003
Mr. John Lesley
Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
NC DEPT. 0 M!V; n�?�
AND NAT*
i
U
'AUG 0 6 2003
Dear Mr. Lesley:
Per our telephone conversation, I am writing you to inform you of a spill we had on our
property today.
Early this morning we were cleaning out a truck that contained water mixed with some
non -hazardous food -grade material. Some of the liquid spilled and ran into a storm water
drain and'then to a dry, non -flowing creek bed. We were able to clean up the entire spill.
Please let me know if you require further information.
Sincerely,
Janet Hudson
Human Relations Manager
QUALITY

NiOD C0UDtyfDViP0DMCD181ffC81Ih
500 N. Main cat. - 60e 36
Monroe, NC 28112
A Divieion of the Union County ffcalth Dcpertscnt
Phone: [phone] A (704) 2833825
July 31, 2003
Mr. Bivens Steele, Director .
Town of Marshville Public Works
201 West Main Street
Marshville NC 28103
Dear Mr. Steele:
On July 23, 2003, I investigated a citizen complaint of a sewage spill from the sewage
line just East of the Food Lion Shopping complex on Highway 74 East in Marshville. At the time
of my inspection, I observed minimal leakage from the cracks in the concrete, as well as evidence
of past spills and overflows from two access lids. I also observed leakage from one union in the
sewer line itself. The spillage appeared to flow down toward the adjacent creek. Untreated
sewage poses both a health and environmental hazard. The pools of water. formed by the spills
create a condition favorable for mosquito breeding as well.
During our phone conversation of July 28, 2003, you stated that you were aware of the
situation, and had addressed it on different occasions in the past. You stated that you had been in
contact with Sonja -,Williams 'of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources in regards to.reporting spills and solving this problem.
This issue warrants your diligent and continued attention. A speedy solution to this issue
is prudent. If I can assist you in any way, please call me at 704-292-2596.
Sincerely,
Reynaldo S. Barron .
Environmental Health Specialist
Environmental Health Division
RSB jmm
r�F EFiyiRd�� '
�c . Ms. Sonja Williams k1C�EPi• RES'
Mooresville Regional Office P'"I Sp 4�J 1 OFF10
N.C.D.E.N.R.
919 North MainStreet
1Vlooresville NC 28115'
`
VINJE
c�t

4
MEMORANDUM
TO: FILE �,,/`
FROM: CLINTON COOKS /� 'V-
SUBJECT: BOREN BRICK DAM
DATE: 4 2/03
CC: JIM SIMONS, MELL NEVILS, DOUG MILLER, SUSAN YATES, ZAH[D KHAN,cREr,,
'GlEA50N' Y
I performed an inspection of a dam within the Boren Brick Facility in Union County on
March 13, 2003. The inspection was performed in response to a request from Jim Simons,
PG, PE (Director - Division of Land Resources). This memorandum was prepared in an
effort to document the site inspection and its findings as well as any actions that were taken
after returning to the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) on March 14, 2003.
I received a call from Jim Simons GS) between 6:00pm and 7:00pm on March 13, 2003.
JS explained that he had received a call from Emergency Management concerning a dam in
Union County. JS explained that the dam was 5 to 6 feet tall and impounded enough water
to cover an area of between 5 and 10 acres and that the water surface in the pond had begun
to rise after the spillway had been blocked to contain a chemical spill. JS also explained that
severe storms were expected in the area and that a house trailer may be located in an area
that could be impacted by failure of the dam. Mr. Simons indicated that someone from the
MRO should visit the site to determine if the dam was considered a hazard to the homes or
roads downstream. JS also directed me to contact Emergency Management in Raleigh after
someone from the Land Quality staff had been able to assess the site. After ending the call
with JS, I contacted Mark Adkins (Senior Geologist - Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.)
to determine the location of the dam and to schedule a time and location for an on -site
meeting. However, I could not. reach Mr. Adkins. As a result, I called Susan Yates
(Environmental Technician V - responsible for Union County) to determine -if she was
familiar with the site and was available to assist me with the inspection. Susan Yates (SY)
was not available so I left a message with a relative. I then received a call from Mr. Adkins.
He indicated that the dam was located within the Boren Brick Facility (Kendrick Mine) in
Monroe and that he could have someone at the site within 45 minutes. I then called SY to
let her know the situation and to ask if she could meet at the site. SY indicated that she
could be on the site in 30 minutes and that she would call me after inspecting the dam and
downstream areas. I informed SY that I would be leaving my house and that she could
reach me on my cell phone.
I arrived at the MRO at approximately 9:00pm. Upon arriving I contacted Zahid Khan
(Acting Regional Engineer) to inform him of the situation. I then called SY to request an
update. SY indicated that the house trailer was close to the channel downstream of the dam,
but that two roads were located between the dam and the trailer. The first road was

considered a "haul road," only used by the mine and the second, which was downstream of
the first, was (SR 1378). SY also indicated that the pond's water surface was at the top of
the dam, but that it was difficult to determine the height of the dam because there was a
small pond or detention basin located at the toe of the dam in question. SY and I
determined that the dam and associated pond were shown on the USGS maps (specifically
the dam was located on the dividing line between Bakers and the Matthews Quadrangles),
which I had in the office, but that the dam was not currently on.the dam inventory. After
speaking with SY, I contacted JS to update. I told JS that the dam was not on inventory and
did not appear to pose a threat to the home or roads downstream, but that I was planning to
visit the site as a precaution. JS instructed me to contact Emergency Management to inform
them of the situation and to let them know that we had someone at the dam. I did so and
the Emergency Management coordinator indicated that C.W. Adcock with the Union
County Emergency Management had been at the site since approximately 7:30pm. I
informed the Emergency Management coordinator that I did not believe that Mr. Adcock
was currently on -site and that perhaps he had been to the site earlier.
After arriving at the site (approximately 10:45pm), I spoke with Mr. Jack Garvey
(representative of Boren Brick) and Mr. Todd Spanish (Staff Geologist - Engineering
Consulting Services, Ltd.). I immediately asked Mr. Garvey what had been spilled. Mr.
Garvey indicated that he was not sure what was spilled, but that it was believed that the
chemical had been released from the northern most fuel storage tank (shown on the map of
the Bakers Quadrangle). SYlater informed me thatMr. Spanish had indicated thathe was unsure as to
the type of material spilled. An inspection of the dam revealed that the small earthen channel,
which functioned as the spillway had been filled in an attempt to confine the pollutant to the
pond. It also appeared that water or other liquid continued to enter the pond from the
south. These two factors caused the water surface to rise to the crest of the dam, as SY had
indicated. In fact, the water was beginning to move over the dam in a few areas. The crest
was also observed to be clear of all vegetation. Mr. Garvey indicated that the crest had been
cleared of debris so that fill could be added to the crest in order to provide additional
storage. This cleared debris .(e.g. trees and bushes) had been piled on the toe and
downstream slope, which made inspection of these areas very difficult. However, it
appeared that the dam was less than 5 feet in height and would not release enough water,
even with a complete failure, to damage the toad downstream or the house trailer below the
road. The inspection did reveal that in an attempt to provide a secondary pollutant spill
control measure, the Boren Brick personnel had blocked the culvert under the haul road.
This could cause the storm water runoff to overtop the haul road during a large storm event.
Because of the location and orientation of state road (SR 1378), water could flow over the
state road as well. However, considering the height of the dam, any additional water released
by a dam failure during a large storm event would not cause significant additional damage.
As a result, the dam should not be considered high hazard and should be considered exempt
from the Dam Safety Law of 1967.
Before leaving the site, Mr. Mark Adkins arrived. I explained to Mr. Adkins that I did
not believe that the dam presented a threat to the road or the downstream homes, but I
encouraged Mr. Adkins to notify the downstream residents of the spill so that they could
take any necessary precautions. Mr. Adkins indicated, as Mr. Garvey had earlier, that the
1)

downstream residents had not been notified. He also indicated that the residents were using
wells as their primary source of drinking water. Before leaving the site, pump trucks from an
environmental cleanup service had arrived and were in the process of setting up to pump
water from the bottom of the lake in an effort to provide additional storage. I also informed
the Emergency Management coordinator that I would be leaving the site and that the dam
did not appear to present a threat to the downstream residents.
Upon returning to the MRO on March 14, 2003, I notified JS and Mr. Mel Nevils, Jr.,
PE (Section Chief - Land Quality Section) of my findings. Both recommended that I
contact the Water Quality Section to inform them of my findings. In an effort, to complete
this task, Zahid Khan and I met with Mr. Rex Gleason; PE (Regional Engineer — Water
Quality Section). I explained to Mr. Gleason that both SY and I had observed numerous
dead fish floating on the lake and had detected a very strong smell in the area surrounding
the pond. I also explained that SY believed that the chemical smelled like some sort of fuel
while I believed it smelled much more like an acid. Mr. Gleason asked me if I had seen any
signs of oil on the surface of the water. I indicated that I had not. I did, however, observe
booms floating on the surface of the pond. I explained to Mr. Gleason that the
environmental cleanup consultant, Mr. Adkins had indicated that the incident had been
reported to Mr. Alan Johnson (Water Quality Section) several days earlier. Mr. Gleason
indicated that this was probably an oil spill and that he would like to discuss the situation
with Mr. Johnson. Mr. Gleason, Mr. Khan and I proceeded to Mr. Johnson's office. Mr.
Alan Johnson indicated that the incident had been reported several days earlier as an oil spill,
but that since the facility personnel could locate no signs of oil on the ground's surface, they
had concluded that the contaminate had originated from beneath the ground and was
therefore considered a Ground Water issue so the case had been referred to the Ground
Water Section.
I then proceeded to discuss the situation with Mr. Chuck Pippin (Ground Water
Section). Mr. Pippin indicated that the Ground Water Section would be working with the
consultant to cleanup the spill and that the case had been assigned to Peggy Fleming
(Ground Water Section).

MAR.20.2003 1:04PM ECS CHARLOTTE
ENGINE, ERING CONSULT
8702 Red oak Boulevard
suite A
charlotte, NC 28217
[phone]
To:
Mr. Allen Johnson
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
From: Mark S. Adkins, P.G.
ECS Job # 08;2591 ¢oxen Brick Fuel Oil Release - Assessment
to Fouow.'Via:
[�X Mail
NO.323 P.1/11
Fax Cover Sheet
Date: March 20, 2003
#, of Pages (incl. cover) 7
(oC�P
Fax: [phone]
FedEX)UPS Courier N/A
Urgent FIReply, ASAP
Dear Mr. Johnson:
IX For Your Review XX Please Comment
Attached is a copy of the °5-pay" report for. the referenced site. The hard copies with Supporting
figures and documentation will follow via mail. Please call if you have any questions,
Sincerely,
Mark S. Adkins, P.G.
Principal Environmental Geologist
Pnvironmental Services Manager - Charlotte

MAR.20.2003 1:04PM ECS CHARLOTTE
NO.323 P.2i11
ENGMERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical a Construction Materials • Environmental March 20, 2003
Mr. Allen Johnson
North Carolina ]department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street .
Mooresville, North Carolina 2811.5
Subject; Report of )Fuel Oil Release to Watershed V Detention Poled
Boren Clay Products Monroe Plant
2304 Brickyard Road, US Mghway 74
Monroe, North Carolina 2811
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. is pleased to submit this required 5-Day Report on. behalf
of Boren Clay Products, Inc (Boren) with respect to a discovery of impact to a watershed
detention pond by a subsurface fuel oil release at The referenced site, This report is being
submitted pursuant to, your request from a telephone notification of the release provided to you by
Boren on March 12, 2003, 'This 5-Day report includes a description of the fpllowing items: 1)
release discovery background information; 2) measures taken, to mitigate downstream migration
of contamination; and 3) results of preliminary assessment activities to evaluate the source of the
release, .the magnitude and extent, and to perform• appropriate corrective actions to minimize
additional impact to surface water features and groundwater at the site.
RELEASE DISCOVERY BACKGROUND
The morning of March 12, 2003, Mr_ Ani Keck (Monroe Plant Manager for Boren) informed Mr.
lack Garvey (Boren $nvironmental Manager) of an observed fish kill in Watershed V detention
pond at the Boren Brick facility located in Monroe, North Carolina. The subject site is shown on
Figure 1. Tire location of Watershed V detention pond is identified on Figure 2. Upon -further
investigation, diesel fuel odors were smelled in the southeast area of the pond. Additional fish
kill was also noted at ether locations along the shores of the lake.
The referenced detention pond is located generally west-northwest of four existing aboveground
diesel fuel storage tanks (Photograph 1). The diesel fuel, storage tanks locations are shown on
Figure 2. Two of the diesel fuel storage tanks,.a 300,000 and a 210,000 gallon capacity tank, are
out of service and were reported to be empty (Tanks 7 and 8 shown on Figure 2). Storage Tank
No. 9.shown on Figure 2 (150,000 gallons capacity) is presently in Service and supplies a nearby
24,000�gallon tank (Storage Tank No, 10 on Figure 2). The 24,000-gallon tank provides fuel via.
underground line to a kiln building located about 100 feet to the east.
in respogse to the detected fish kill and petroleum odors, and in accordance witlr requirements of
the site $pill Prevention and Countermeasures Control (SPCC) Plan and storm -water .permit,
Boren sealed the pond outlets to prevent runoff into adjoinin detention basins, farther
8702 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite A, Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] • FA'X [phone] • www.ecsiimited.com
Abcrdaeo, PADIF - Atlanta, GA • AMtu1, TX - Baltimore, MD • Cbentilly, VA . Charlotte. NC' Chicago. IL • Cornc►ia, GA* • Dalles, TX
Danyillc, VA • Frederick, MD • Ftodr dcklburg, V,A • Gmanpboro. NC • Greenville, SC • Norfglk, V A - Orlando, FL • Research Triangle Park, NC
Richmond. VA , Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX Wllllambburg, VA Wilmington, NC Wlnchuter, VA
*Teatiap Sorvlce; Only

MAR.20.2003 1:04PM ECS CHARLOTTE NO.323 P.3i11
NCDENR — 5-Day Report 1190rch 20, 2003
Friel 011 Relep,se to Watershed V Deteplion Pond ECS Pwjert M2591
poren Clay Products Monroe Plant
downstream and potentially off property. Upon arrival to the site by Mr. Garvey in the afternoon
of March 12, a " ruiribow" sheen was visible on the pond. The area containing the sheen was
estimated to be about 200 feet in length and about 15 feet in Width. The Source of the fuel oil
contamination was unknown At that time, Photographs 2 and 3 show views of the detention pond. .
including the observed fuel oil sheen.
DOWNSTREAM DISCHARGE WTXGATION
An evaluation of the pond outlets was performed. The Site watershed map (Figure 2) 'showed one
outlet from Watershed V detention pond to be at the West side.. The outlet discharges into an
extension of Watershed V that receives runoff from the active mine site to the southwest. The
West extension of Watershed V detention pond discharges into a culvert which flows under a haul
road to northwest of the main pond body and into the Watershed X detention basin (see Figure 2),
The upstream side of the culvert adjacent to the haul road was blocked with plastic boards and
soils.
A second identified potential discharge outlet for the main body of W ater$hed V detention pond
Was a concrete spillwaylocated at the downstream (north) end of the pond. The spillway
discharges into Watershed IV detention basin (see Figure 2 and Photograph 4). Two culverts
discharge water from Watershed IV detention basin into 'Watershed X detention basin to the
north-northwest via dxW culverts located under the existing haul road. Outflow from 'Watershed
X detention basin (which receives discharge from Watershed V, Watershed V west extension and
Watershed IV detention basin) discharges downstream via two gravel -encased perforated riser
barrels (Photograph 5). The dual culverts that discharge from Watershed IV detention basin were
blocked using the same procedures described for Watershed V detention pond west extension.
REGM,A.TOYtY NOTIFICATION
Initial notification of the fish kill, diesel fuel impact discovery and preliminary response actions
were reported to NCDENR the afternoon of March 12, 2003. According to the notes of Mr. Jack
Garvey, NCDENR was notified of the presence of fuel oil in a detention pond at the site, The
size of an observed rainbow sheen was reported to be about 200 feet in length and about 15 feet
wide. The presence of dead small fish was reported (Photograph 6). Sealing of the pond outlets
as described above was also reported. Mr. Garvey reported that there was no readily visible
evidence of contamination exiting the pond and flowing downstream. The NCDENR was further
apprised that ECS had been engaged to performed assessment of the source, nature, magnitude
and extent of impact by the detected diesel fuel release. A & D Environmental and Industrial
Services, Inc. (A 3t V) was engaged to perform fuel containment and cleanup on the water
surface of the detention pond. NCDENR was informed that A & D was sehedyled to mobilize to
the site on March 13, 2003. In response to notification by Boren, you requested a dead fish count
and preparation of a $ Day report of activities. In addition, you requested continued containment
of potential discharge from the detention pond.
2

MAR.20.2003 1-05PM ECS CHARLOTTE NO.323 P.4i11
NCDENR — 5-Day Report lWarch 20, 2003
Fuel Oil Release to Warershed V Detention Pond
Boren CIay Produds Monroe Plant Ec$ Project M2591
CONTAMINATION CLEANUP ACTIVITIES
On March 13, 2003, A & D began placing oil -absorbing booms on the water surface of
Watershed V detention pond to contain the oil and facilitate vacuuming any free-floating product.
The main body of Watershed V detention pond was boomed as shown on Figure 3. Photographs
7, S, 9 and 10 show views of the pond after boom placement, The far southeastern corner of
Watershed V Detention Pond contained free product floating on the water surface. The free
product was generally limited to adjacent to the bank. A & D placed absorbent blankets on the
free product present along the bank in that area (Photograph I I).
BCS personnel collected surface water samples at the two Watershed V detention pond outlets, at
a riser'barrel location in 'Watershed X detention basin, and at the Boren Clay Products property
boundarydownstream; tp the northwest. The general sampling points are shown on Figure 3. The
water samples were apalyzed by EPA Methods 602 and 625 for volatile and semi -volatile
petroleum constituents, No petroleum constituents were detected in the analyzed water samples.
The analytical results for the initial surface water samples collected at the site on March 13 are
attached to this report,
The water level in Watershed V detention pond_ was observed by Mr. Garvey to be rising as a
result of blocking of the discharge points, which . resulted in a concern for spill over into
Watershed V detention pond west extension and into Watershed IV detention basiA. Based on the
results of consultations, ECS and Boren personnel determined that the most effective mitigation
of potential overspill was pumping from the bottom of the pond near the north concrete spillway
and discharge over the levee into Watershed IV detention basin. Permission for the discharge
was solicited from the NCDENR DWQ and received from W. Steve Lewis at approximately
7:00 PM on March 13, 2003,
Mr. Garvey of Boren, and ECS personnel Mark Adkins and,Todd Spanish met with NCDENR,
Division of Land Resources — Dam Safety Section representatives Clinton Cook and Susan Yates
late in the evening oq March 13, 2003 to evaluate dam conditions relative to the potential Ior
overspill and/or failure. Based on a reconnaissance, the Dam . Safery Section representatives
determined that the integrity of the dam was presently intact; however, also opcouraged the
approved pumping discharge from Watershed V detention pond. Pumping discharge from the
pond was commenced at about 12:15 AM on March 14, 2003, The discharge was visually
monitored constantly for the initial approximate 10 hours of p=ping activities for potential
diesel fuel contamination impact to Watershed IV detention basin. Photographs 12 and 13' show
discharge into Watershed IV detention basin on March 14, 2403. The discharge has been
monitored for diesel fuel contamination periodically during the day and night since initial
continuous monitoring activities were discontinued about mid -clay on March 14. No obvious
evidence of fuel oil contamination was observed in Watershed IV or X detention basins during
the initial constant monitoring or during the initial periodic monitoring through the weekend of
March 14 through 16.
Due to. anticipated rain events on the weekend of March 14 through 16, two additional pumps
were added to discharge from Watershed V detention pond. The evening of Friday March 14,
2003, a surface water sample was collected at the downstream property line to monitor potential
downstream migration of dissolved petroleum in water. The water sample was submitted for the
same analytical parwnetors as those previously described. No petroleum constituents were
3

MAR.20.2003 1:05PM ECS CHARLOTTE NO.323 P.5i11
NCDENR — 5-Day Report March 20, 2003
Fuel Oil Release to Warershed VDerentlaa Pon4
Boren Clay Products Monroe Plant ECS Project 1y12591
detected in the water sample obtained. The water sample analytical data reports are attached to
this report.
The anticipated heavy rain events occurred.over the weekend of March 15 and 16. The resultant
of the rainfall was an increased volume of free product discharging at the southeastern corner of
Watershed V detention'pond (Photographs 14 and 15). The free product was contained initially
by absorbent booms at an approximate W-ft radius out from the shoreline. Containment booms
were maintained at the same point about 50 feet out frot n the shoreline as originally placed on
March 13, The inflowipg free product has been periodically suctioned off of the water surface by
A & D since the observations on MMarch 16.
Precipitation events have continued to. occur since March 15; resultipg in the necessity to
continue pumping water from Watershed 'V detention pond. On Match 16, a fgel oil sheen was
observed on the water surface of 'Watershed TV detention basin. The source of the sheen was,
unknown but suspected to have been influenced by the heavy 'rainfall on the Weekend of March
15 and 16. b1 respopso to the observed -sheen; ECS collected surface water samples from
Water9W IV and X detention ponds and at the downstream property line. Analytical testing of
the surface water samples obtained did not detect petroleum constituents. The water sample
analytical data reports are attached to this report.
Absorbent booms werq maintained at the discharge points from both detention ponds to minimize
the potential for downstream migration (Photographs 16 and 17). Surface water samples have
been collected at the same points since the observation of the sheep on Watershed IV detention
pond. The' results of the subsequently collected water sample analyses will be forwarded to you
at a later date.
Discharge of water from Watershed V detention pored continued unabated since the observation
of the sheen on Watershed IV detention basin due to the continued rainfall events and water
levels in the pond. Og March 19, 2003, the pond water surface was lowered to a level such that
potential overflow was not considered to be an immediate concern. Pumping was discontinued
until a rise in the pond level is again observed.
RELEASE SOURCE EVALUATION
in the evening of March • 12, 2003, Boren Clay Products personnel begap removing bolts on the
top caps of the three lArgest diesel fuel storage tanks to evaluate the presence/ab$ence of contents
and estimate a volume of fuel present. On March 13, 2Q03, the two out -of -service tanks (Storage
Tanks 7 & 8 on Figure 2) were found to be empty, The third storage tank contained an estimated
50,000 gallons of product. Boren personnelalso excavated an area of the diesel fuel underground
pipeline where a 90° fitting had been repaired in recent months to evaluate potential
contamination release evidence. The fitting was found to be loose with evidence of product
ieaj age into underlying soils. The valves connecting the line to the aboveground storage supply
tanks were closed upgn discovery of the compromised line connection.
On March 14, 2003,L an evaluation of potential source locations and magnitude of subgrade
impact was begun. The preliminary contamination assessment was perfo=d by drilling three
continuous -flight auger, borings at the locations shown on Figure 3. One boring (B4) was
.19

MAR.20.2003 1:05PM ECS CHARLOTTE
NCDENR - S-Day Report
Fuel Oil Release eo Water9hed V Detentipri Pond
Boren Clay Prodyep Afonroa Plant
NO.323 P.6!11
lWarch 20, 2003
ECS Project M2591
advanced in the vicinity of the location where the leaking 900 fitting was discovered on March 13.
The boring was drilled to a depth of about 30 feet below existing, grade. The upper approximately
10 feet of the boring encountered fill materials that contained diesel fuel contamination. Residual
soils were encountered below the upper fill. No groundwater or free product was observed at the
time of drilling. The boxing was left open to allow for inflow of groundwater, if any. Several
hours after completion of drilling in boring B-1, groundwater was observed at a depth of about 15
feet below existing grade. Approximately one-fourth of an, inch of free product was measured on
the groundwater surface. .Upon discovery of these conditions,,.a PVC pipe was installed in the
open borehole to a depth of about 25 feet below existing grade. The upper approximate 10 to 15
feet of the pipe was manually slotted to serve as an intake screen. Small gravel to coarse sand
was place in the annular space between the borehole wall and the pipe to serve as a filter pack to
minimize intrusion into the well by fine sediments.
Two additional borings were drilled to the west-soutl►west of the. aboveground storage tanks (B-2
and B-3 as shown on Figure 3): Boring B-2 was drilled to a depth of about 23 feet below existing
grade, A mixture of brickbat and soil fill was encountered to a depth of about four feet. A
detection of slight petroleum odors were noted in the fill materials, A, temporary well was also
installed in the borehole to depth, of about 20 feet. Periodic monitoring of groundwater in the
temporary well over an approximate 20our period did not yield evidence of free product. The
boring/well has since been destroyed by exploration trench excavation activities, described below.
Boring B-3 was termipated at a depth of about 18 feet below existing grade wits no observation
of free product or groundwater. The borehole was then baekfilled after completion of drilling.
Based on the observations of up to about 10 feet of mixes} brickbat and soil fill in the boring
drilled at the fuel oil line area and in the borings drilled along the bank above Watershed V
detention pond, an evaluation of -potential product migration in fill was ,jointly determined
between ECS and Boren representatives to be appropriate. The fill condition evaluation was
performed by digging exploration trenches at the locations shown on Figure'I Chi March'17, one
test trench was excavated in the area of Boring B-2 along the top of the ba4k'4bove'Watershed V
Detention Pond. The excavation encountered an apparent abandoned concrete pipe of about one -
to -two feet diameter, A uuxture' of fuel oil and water was observed seeping, from around the
outside of the pipe and from the interior. Photograph 18 shows a view of the concrete pipe. A
second trench was excavated on March 18 to the east of the aboveground storage tanks (see
Figure 3) to evaluate the lateral extent of the concrete pipe in the direction of the discovered line
leak location. The concrete pipe was again encountered in the excavation with evidence of fuel
oil movement laterally along the outside of the pipe. A break in the pipe was also observed
allowing penetration of fuel oil into the pipe,
The bottoms of the excavations below the pipes were lined with plastic to collect inflowing fuel
oil and contaminated water. The collected fluids are periodically suctioned out of the sumps by'A
& D.
Assessment of the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination impact is presently ongoing
concurrent with mitigation of free product migration both andergroupd, and in Watershed V
detention pond. The location of boring and temporary well B-1 is being over drilled to install a
six-inch, diameter outer casing through the upper fill. After the grout in the casing is allowed to
set for an approximate 24-hour period, the existing boring will then be reamed to approximately
six inches diameter to facilitate the installation of a permanent inner well. The well will be
installed to a depth of about 24 feet in consideration of a depth to groundwater of between about
15 and 17 feet. The well will be purged to remove potential contaminants that may have been

MAR.20.2003 1:06PM ECS CHARLOTTE NO.323 P.7i11
NCDENR — 5-Day Report Mach 20, 2003
Fuel Oil Release to Watershed V Ddentlon Porid
Boren Clay Products Monroe Plant ECS Project M2591
introduced froria drilling activities and to establish reconnection with the aquifer. The well will be
monitored for the potential presence of free product. if free product is detccte4, the well will be
sampled and analyzed for dissolved petroleum constituents. A program of farther soil and
groundwater assessment will be developed in part'frorn the findings obtained from -the test
trenches and permanent monitoling well. .
CLOSING
It is our pleasure to prgvide this information to NCDENR on behalf of Boren clay Products, Inc.
We are available at you convenience to discuss the contents of,this report or other aspects of the
project,
Sincerely,
gNGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
�tutntr,�t
•,`e
Mark $. Adldns, P.G.
- SET =
1764
Principal Environmental Geologist
% 4`��,
Attachments
�
''r, S7EpH
•.•`�•
6

MAR.20.2003 1:06PM ECS CHARLOTTE NO.323 P.8i11

MAR.20.2003 1:06PM ECS CHARLOTTE
NO.323 P.9i11
74
0 ty n b6°
_r 1� rr
'F, P`• /( j -'� y ,%�� '`' ( `''/s i! k _ ,i 11 I Y' 1 ' (" . \ I
� �1'.•/ yu'1 Vn •;�c .h"„—� _ �a / .. _ I �.r _� 4' �. ` _ r' 11"' t 1 1
It
Ax
it
kw
tZ
it i��'•�•: �' 1 V// ") "�'•v_ ,� y(a t�a�'
`1 r , .� �. 1 /, • •7 .arm ° /.`/ �. \ • �ui1h6 � � �'� - 11 11Ca h
\ ,. r _ / ... \�� l ( ti w . _ *�?•. Gib' I �!,
1
_ lI (- ' , I `'� V
� / i�- :,��.�•� --- •-1/ 64° l - ((�119 � '� �����, •� Gbh \l
650'r
SOURCE:
United States Geologic Survey 7•5-
Minute Series Topographic Map:
Matthem* and Bakers, North Carolina
Quadrangles, dated 1971 and photon
revised 1987/19W
SCALE: 1 "=2000'
[,I
-Cswo
ENGINU'RING
CaO N,9 11urfN(I
,Z;ERVIC:E' -),LTD
FIGURE lA
SITE AREA TOPOGRAPHY
BOREN CLAY PRODUCTS
MONROE PLANT
2304 BRICKYARD ROAD
MONROE, NORTR CAROLWA
ECS Prom MU591

MAR.20.2003 1:06PM ECS CHARLOTTE
NO.323 P.10i11
� 1
i
I)ISCHA OF- RIS PIPM
1W�
WATERSHED
i
PIPES
SPILL®VA
�ATERSHED V
1 UNLEADED GASOLINE - 550 GALLONS
2 KEROSENE 260 GALLONS
3 WASTE OIL - .925 GALLONS
OILY WASH WATER - 11,000 GALLONS
A HWY DIESEL - 24000 GALLONS
5 NON-HWY DIESEL - 11000 GALLONS
6 HYDRAULIC OIL - 280 GALLONS
7 DIESEL FUEL - 210000 GAL0NS
8 DIESEL FUEL - 300000 GALLONS .
9 DIESEL FUEL - 150000 GALLONS
10. DIESEL FUEL - 24000 GALLONS
11 DIESEL FUEL, - 4000 GALLONS
12 BRICK 04 - 1000 GALLONS
13 DIESEL FUEL- - 4000 GALLONS
14 DIESEL. OIL (UST) PENDING FINAL CLOSURE
15 BRICK OIL - 55 GALLONS
15 HYDRAULIC OIL - 210 GALLONS
17 BRICK OIL 55 GALLONS
18 BRICK OIL - 55 GALLONS
19 GARAGE AREA - MISC CONTAINERS
20 DIESEL FUEL. - 11.00 GALLONS
21 tiYD OULC OIL S - 2E10 GALLONS
LUB22 BRICK OIL - 500 GALLONS _—
/ is 1 r'l
Notes:
SOURCE; r- — -
Site Plan from Spill Prevention Control PMMSLTD
Countermeasures Plan Provided by Boren _ -- - --- -
Clay Products, Inc.
CONSULTING(
SCALE: 1"=2000' SER,VICES,=
FIGURE 2
SITE PLAN
BORED CLAY PRODUCTS
MONROE PLANT
2304 BRICKYARD ROAD
MONROE, NORTH CA,ROLINA
ECS Project M2591

MAR.20.2003 1:07PM ECS-CHARLOTTE
i
XIWATERSHED X
I
FREE
NO.323 P.11/11
PL _ ..
QQ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE POINT
*BORING
TEST TRENCH LOCATION ,
r ~� ABSORBENT/CONTAINMENT BOi
)Votes:
r j
SOURCE:
FIGURE 3
ASSESSMENT POINT LOCATION
C
SWEP
PLAN
Site Plan from Spill Prevention Control
BOREN CLAY. PRODUCTS
Countermeasures Plan Provided by Boren
--- --
MONROE PLANT
Clay Products, Inc.
—
2304 BRICKYARD ROAD
CONSULTING
MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1"=2000'
SERVICES,LTD
ECS Project M2591

B
•] I 9K0111 l I wm-o IC :A 9: [N=1:1•
C=U11-1A[y'1Y[•
U=N7•lIMNJ1IA►,ION mms.'1111y1I► iI_\

August 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1
2.0 DEFINITIONS
1
3.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
3
3.1 Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation Facility
3
3.2 Crooked Creek Water Reclamation. Facility
3
3.3 Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
3
3.4 Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
4
3.5 Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
4
3.6 Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
4
TABLE 3-1
5
TABLE 3-2
6
TABLE 3-3
7
TABLE 3-4
8
TABLE 3-5
9
TABLE 3-6
10
4.0 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT
11
5.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
11
Union County Wastewater System Page i Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
1.0 INTRODUCTION
House Bill 1160, the Clean Water Act of 1999, was ratified by the North Carolina
General Assembly on July 20, 1999 and signed into law by the Governor on July 21,
1999. This legislation placed significant reporting requirements on entities that own
or operate wastewater systems. This Performance Summary is intended to
establish compliance with said rule.
The Union County Public Works Department is charged with the management,
operation and maintenance of the County's sanitary sewer system. During the
2001-2002 fiscal year the wastewater system was comprised of 6 wastewater
treatment plants (WWTP), over 60 wastewater pumping stations and over 320 miles
of pipe with over 12,000 connections. In addition to the 6 WWTP's which have a
combined rated treatment capacity of 4.9 million gallons per day (MGD), the
County, through contractual agreement, has 1.95 MGD and 3.0 MGD of purchased
capacity at the City of Monroe WWTP and Charlotte's McAlpine Creek WWTP
respectively.
Public Works' Mission Statement is as follows:
Develop water, sewer and solid waste infrastructure that supports residential,
commercial, industrial and agricultural needs while meeting Federal/State
regulations and providing our customer base with acceptable levels of service at
cost effective rates
2.0 DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Performance Report the following definitions apply:
• Aerobic — A condition in which atmospheric or dissolved molecular oxygen is
present in the aquatic environment.
• Automatic Telephone Dialer or ATD — A device connected to the telephone
system that will alert programmed telephone numbers of equipment status.
• Biological Nutrient removal — The process of removing nitrogen and
phosphorus from wastewater using biological processes as opposed to chemical
means.
• Biosolids — A primarily organic solid product, produced by wastewater
treatment processes that can be beneficially recycled. The word biosolids is
replacing the word sludge.
• BOD — Biochemical Oxygen Demand — The rate at which organisms use the
oxygen in water or wastewater while stabilizing decomposable organic matter
under aerobic conditions. The BOD Test is a procedure that measures the rate
of oxygen use under controlled conditions of time and temperature. BOD is
typically used to express the "strength" of wastewater.
Union County Wastewater System Page 1 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
e CI-2—Chlorine Residual — The amount of chlorine present in the final effluent
after disinfection. Typically measured in micrograms per liter or milligrams per
liter.
e D.O. — Dissolved Oxygen — Molecular (atmospheric) oxygen dissolved in a
liquid.
e Effluent — Treated wastewater flowing from the treatment system.
e Extended Aeration — A type of wastewater treatment facility in which the
wastewater is retained and treated for a minimum of 24 hours at design flow
before discharge occurs.
e Impeller- A rotating set of vanes in a pump designed to pump or lift water.
{ e Fecal Coliform — The coliform (bacteria) found in the feces of warm blooded _
animals. The presence of coliform-group bacteria is an indication of possible
pathogenic bacterial contamination.
e MGD — Million Gallons per Day — Volumetric measurement of flow converted to
j millions. Example .150 MGD x 1,000,000 = 150,000 gallons per day (gpd).
e NH3— Nitrogen as Ammonia — A compound found naturally in wastewater.
The compound is produced by the deamination of organic nitrogen containing
compounds.
e NPDES Permit — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -
Permits, required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of
1972, which regulate discharges to surface waters.
e pH — The expression of the intensity of the basic or acidic condition of a liquid.
e Pump Station —A holding tank with pumps that forces wastewater uphill when
flow by gravity is not possible.
e SBR — Sequencing Batch Reactor — A type of wastewater treatment facility
that treats and discharges water in batches as opposed to continuous flow.
e Telemetry — A system -by which information pertaining to remote equipment
status is transmitted via radio waves to a central location.
e TSS — Total Suspended Solids — Particles suspended in a liquid.
e Turbidity — The measurement of the clearness or cloudiness of a liquid.
Union County Wastewater System Page 2 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
3.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
(Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
During the 2001-2002 fiscal year the Department of Public Works operated and
maintained a total of six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Although each Permit
requires facility visitation daily, excluding weekends and holidays, Public Works'
wastewater treatment facilities are checked 7 days per week 365 days per year. All
treatment facilities are equipped with emergency back-up power generators. Each
treatment facility is equipped with either telemetry or an automated telephone dialer.
In addition to telemetry or ATD, each facility has both audible and visual trouble
alarms. Wastewater treatment plant staff rotate "call duty" for after hour situations
that may arise.
A brief overview of each facility and Performance Summary Graph for each facility
is provided herein.
3.1 Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation. Facility
Permit No. NC0085359. Twelve Mile is an extended aeration facility utilizing
biological nutrient removal and tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via
UV (ultraviolet light). Twelve Mile effluent is discharged into Twelve Mile Creek,
which is part of the Catawba River Basin. The facility is permitted to discharge up to
2.5 MGD of treated wastewater. Twelve Mile is located at 3104 Providence Road
South and serves Wa .huev as wall as por ions of Indian Trail and Stallings. With
over 3900 effluent monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.9%
compliance with permitted monthly average limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002.
Please refer to Table 3-1.
3.2 Crooked Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. NC0069841. Crooked Creek is an extended aeration facility utilizing
tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via chlorination/dechlorination.
Crooked Creek effluent is pumped over 17,000 feet to discharge into the North Fork
Crooked Creek which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. This facility is
permitted to discharge up to 1.9 MGD of treated wastewater. Crooked Creek is
located at 4015 Sardis Church Road and serves the Indian Trail, Lake Park and
Stallings areas. With over 2600 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained
100% compliance with permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer
to Table 3-2.
3.3 Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NC0072508. Hunley Creek is a Sequencing Batch Reactor.
Disinfection is accomplished via ch lori n ation/dechl ori nation. Hunley Creek effluent
is discharged into Goose Creek, which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. This
facility is permitted to discharge up to .231 MGD of treated wastewater. Hunley
Creek is located at 6913 Stevens Mill Road and serves the subdivisions of
Shanamara, Hunley Creek and Stevens Mill. With over 1000 monitoring tests
Union County Wastewater System Page 3 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
performed, this facility maintained 99.9% compliance with permitted limits for the
fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-3.
3.4 Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. WQ0011928. Olde Sycamore is an extended aeration facility with
tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via UV (ultraviolet light). This facility
is permitted to discharge up to .150 MGD of treated wastewater. Olde Sycamore is
located within and serves the Olde Sycamore Golf Community located off Highway
218 and Rock Hill Church Road. Olde Sycamore effluent is discharged to a
manmade impoundment where it is then pumped onto the Olde Sycamore Golf
Course as a source of irrigation. This facility maintained 100% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-4.
3.5 Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NC0069523. Tallwood is an extended aeration facility with tertiary
filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via tablet chlorination. This facility is
permitted to discharge up to .05 MGD of treated wastewater. Tallwood is located
within and serves the Tallwood Subdivision off Brief Road. Tallwood effluent is
discharged to Clear Creek, which lies in the Yadkin. Pee Dee River Basin. With over
1200 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.9% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-5.
3.6 Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. N,,nO35812. Grassy 3; anch is an extended aeration Facility with tertiary
filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via UV (ultraviolet light). This facility is
permitted to discharge up to .05 MGD of treated wastewater. Grassy Branch is
located at 1629 Old Fish Road and currently serves the Unionville Elementary,
Piedmont Middle and Piedmont High Schools. Grassy Branch effluent is
discharged to Crooked Creek which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. With
over 950 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.8% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-6.
Union County Wastewater System Page 4 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-1
Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: NCO085359
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
2.5 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
17 ugA
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov: Mar. 10 ppm
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 pprn
(Nov.-Mar.)4 ppm
TSS
30 ppm
Fecal
200 m/100mi
DO
> 6 ppm
% Efficiency
100 0% .10
800%-
60 0%
200/o Will W
Of nearly 3920 tests performed, Twelve Mile VWVfP maintained
an average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal
year ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 5 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-2
Crooked Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: NCO069841
Fiscal .Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
1.900 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
17 u I
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov: Mar. 10 ppm
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 pprn
TSS
30 ppm
Fecal
200 m/100mi
DO
> 6 ppm
% Efficiency
20
rZpQp�p��p�o°pQ�GA�a� QQ�A'oOSOO`L
Of nearly 2670 tests performed, Crooked Creek WWI P maintained a
100% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year ending June
2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 6 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-3
Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit #: NCO072508
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.231 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
20 ugA
BODs
30 pprn
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 pprn
TSS
30pprn
Fecal
200 m/100mi
DO
> 5 PpM
% Efficiency
100.0%
60.0% 20.0% HIM
0.0%2M _
'JpPJ�4�o0
�o, OPG,o,�� ,
Of nearly 1335 tests performed, Hunley Creek WWTP maintained an
average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year
ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 7 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-4
Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: WQ0011928
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.150 MGD
pH, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
BOD5
10 PPM
NH3
4 pprn
TSS
30ppm
Fecal
14 m/100mi
Turbidity
10 NTU
% Efficiency
0/6-
. 9Y''"�i{���2`fS�t �Y '�'h 9 1 •!a'u. M" Via. G.,..
80.0
0.0%
A- K,'
Of nearly 1200 tests performed, Olde Sycamore WWTP
maintained a 100% compliance to permitted parameters for
fiscal year ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 8 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-5
Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit #: NCO069523
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.050 MGD
pH, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov: Mar. 10 pprn
NHs
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 pprn
TSS
30 pprn
Fecal
200 m/100ml
DO
> 6 pprn
% Efficiency
80.0%
o12
20.0%
O� Off' Off' Off' O`�' Off' Off'
Of over 1240 tests performed, Tallwood WW rP maintained an
average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year
ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 9 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-6
Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit #: NCO085812
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.050 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
17 u A
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov: Mar. 10 ppm
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
Nov. -Mar. 4 ppm
TSS
30 ppm
Fecal
200 m/100mi
DO
> 6 ppm
% Efficiency
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
4.0.0%
20.0%
I
0.0%
[1 [1 (
[1
Poi ��� oG �o Qmc ����0rs��� PQ� ��a so
�
z
�
� .1 � h
Of 955 tests performed, Grassy Branch maintained an average
99.8% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year ending
June 2002.
Note: No flow for month of July 2001 due to school summer
vacation.
Union County Wastewater System Page 10 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
4.0 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT
Biosolids are managed and disposed of in accordance with Permit No. WQ
0007486 issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Biosolids are stored at both the Crooked Creek and Twelve Mile Creek
WWTP's. The solids are aerobically digested and then applied as "fertilizer" to
permitted sites. The solids are considered stabilized, and thus suitable for land
application, when the volatile solids content is reduced by 38%. If this 38% volatile
solids reduction can not be achieved, then alkaline stabilization, injection or
incorporation is employed to ensure Permit compliance. The biosolids program was
compliant with all applicable rules for the 2001-2002 fiscal year.
5.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
(Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Currently the Department of Public Works operates and maintains over.60
wastewater pumping stations and nearly 320 miles of pipe with approximately
12,000 connections. The pumping stations are equipped with both audible and
visual alarms. In addition to audible and visual alarms, many stations are equipped
with ATD's or telemetry. All stations without ATD's or telemetry are checked daily,
including weekends and holidays. Pump stations with ATD's or telemetry are check
once per week at a minimum. Emergency back-up power is available via a
combination of permanent and portable generators. Wastewater collection staff
rotate "call duty" for after hour situations that may
Public Works maintains emergency response equipment in a ready state at all
times. This emergency equipment varies in nature from spare electrical parts and
plumbing supplies to vacuum trucks and backhoes. Worker safety is of utmost
importance. Safety equipment such as night lighting, gas monitors, and reflective
cones/signs are also maintained in a ready state.
Public Works has ongoing programs to identify and correct problems associated
with the inflow and infiltration of storm water into the sanitary sewer system.
Additionally, Public works has ongoing programs to inspect and clean sanitary
sewer lines.
During the Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the County's wastewater system collected and
conveyed for treatment in excess of 1.3 billion gallons. Of the 1.3 billion gallons of
wastewater handled, 12 spills with a combined estimated volume of 1.8 million
gallons spilled from the system. A brief description of each spill is presented below:
➢ On October 29, 2001 Union County personnel responded to a report of a
sanitary sewer overflow off Mclendon Drive in Stallings. Public works staff
removed concrete and miscellaneous construction debris from the sewer line.
An estimated 400,000 gallons of wastewater entered a wet weather tributary of
Union County Wastewater System Page 11 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
Davis Mine Creek. Twelve (12) fish were retrieved from a quarter mile stretch of
the creek. Public Works staff dammed Davis Mine Creek with sandbags in an
effort to contain the spill. In excess of 384,000 gallons of wastewater was
pumped back into the sewer system. Lime was spread over the affected area as
part of the remediation efforts. The spill was not of magnitude to cause
endangerment to human health. The North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality was notified of the incident.
➢ On January 20, 2002 at 9:30AM a sanitary sewer overflow was discovered at
manhole 13 in the Trellis Subdivision. Upon investigation it was determined that
the spill was caused by a power failure at the Trellis pump station. As a result of
the spill, 630 gallons of untreated wastewater entered an unnamed tributary of
Ray's Fork. The area was remediated and lime was spread on the affected
area. A report was submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
➢ On January 23, 2002 at approximately 8:00 AM and ending at approximately
1:30 PM on January 26, 2002 an estimated 835,00 gallons of wastewater and
storm water combined spilled from a portion of the of the Union County Sewer
System. The estimated volume is cumulative and is the result of a series of
intermittent wastewater spills that occurred within a contiguous system serving
portions of Eastern Union County. The intermittent spills were the direct result of
storm water from heavy area rains entering the sewer system. All wastewater
pumps and associated equipment were operating properly and at capacity.
Untreated wastewater entered both Rays Fork and New Salem Branch in the
Marshville\Wingate area. Stream samples taken during the event indicated that
wastewater was not present in sufficient quantity to result in the immediate
endangerment of human health or the environment. Public Works staff
monitored the sites "around the clock". Remediation efforts at the spill sites
included the removal and proper disposal of paper and plastic products and the
spreading of lime (lime is used to neutralize pathogenic organisms and the like).
Public Works has an ongoing program to identify and correct any defects in the
wastewater system that would result in storm water entering. The North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately 12:30AM on February 7, 2002 and ending at
approximately 12:15AM on February 9, 2002, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County sewer system. The spill is
attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 509,565 gallons spilled from
a manhole off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Rays Fork. All
wastewater pumps and associated equipment was operating properly and at
capacity. Public Works diverted all available resources to the area in an effort to
determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system. Based on
the findings, appropriate corrective actions are being taken. Stream samples
taken 2\7\02, and follow up samples taken 2\12\02, indicated that the spill posed
Union County Wastewater System Page 12 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
no immediate risk to human health or the environment. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately at 8:00 PM on March 2, 2002 and ending
approximately 2:40 PM on March 3, 2002, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County Sewer System. The spill
is attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 89,800 gallons spilled
from a manhole off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Ray's Fork. All
wastewater pumps and associated equipment was operating properly and at
capacity. Public Works diverted all available resources to the area in an effort to
determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system. Appropriate
corrective actions have been taken. Stream samples taken 3\3\02 indicated that
the spill posed no immediate threat to human health or the environment. The
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately 8:00 a.m. March 21, 2002 and ending at
approximately 4:00 p.m. on the same day, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County Sewer System. The spill
is attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 7,000 gallons spilled
from a manhole located off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Ray's
Fork. All wastewater pumps and associated equipment were operating properly
and at- capacity. Pubiic VJori s diverted all avaiiablia resources to the area in all
effort to determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system.
Appropriate corrective actions have been taken. Stream samples taken the day
of the spill indicated there is no immediate endangerment to human health or the
environment. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality was notified.
➢ On January 5, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurring at manhole #15 on
Lake Park outfall was discovered. An estimated 840 gallons of untreated
wastewater spilled. A build-up of gravel and miscellaneous debris in the sewer
line caused the spill. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of
the State.
➢ On January 30, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow at manhole #9 on Bob White
Circle was reported by a customer. The cause of spill is attributable to the
buildup of grease and solids in sewer line. Approximately 270 gallons spilled on
the roadway and roadside. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter
waters of the State.
➢ On February 12, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the JARRS Pump
Station. The cause of the spill was determined to be a tripped power control
breaker. Approximately 750 gallons spilled around the pump station. The area
was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of the State.
Union County Wastewater System Page 13 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
➢ On May 31, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the Springhill Pump
Station. Weekend "call" personnel responded to a high-water alarm. The cause
of spill is attributable to low incoming power voltage. Approximately 500 gallons
spilled around the station. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter
waters of the State.
➢ On June 29, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the Springhill Pump
Station. Approximately 300 gallons spilled around the station. The cause of the
spill is attributable to area thunderstorms and consequential loss of incoming
power. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of the State.
If there are questions or comments about this report, please contact the Union
County Public Works Department at [phone].
Union County Wastewater System Page 14 Performance Summary FY 01-02

i
(I, August 2002
V
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
(FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002) D 0 d
S E P - 6 2002
QEPIR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH

August 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1
2.0 DEFINITIONS
1
3.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
3
3.1 Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation Facility
3
! 3.2 Crooked Creek Water Reclamation. Facility
3
3.3 Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
3
3.4 Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
4
3.5 Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
4
3.6 Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
4
TABLE 3-1
5
TABLE 3-2
6
TABLE 3-3
7.
TABLE 3-4
g
TABLE 3-5
g
TABLE 3-6
10
4.0 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT
11
5.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
11
Union County Wastewater System Page i Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
1.0 INTRODUCTION
House Bill 1160, the Clean Water Act of 1999, was ratified by the North Carolina
General Assembly on July 20, 1999 and signed into law by the Governor on July 21,
1999. This legislation placed significant reporting requirements on entities that own
or operate wastewater systems. This Performance Summary is intended to
establish compliance with said rule.
The Union County Public Works Department is charged with the management,
operation and maintenance of the County's sanitary sewer system. During the
2001-2002 fiscal year the wastewater system was comprised of 6 wastewater
treatment plants (WWTP), over 60 wastewater pumping stations and over 320 miles
of pipe with over 12,000 connections. In addition to the 6 WWTP's which have a
combined rated treatment capacity of 4.9 million gallons per day (MGD), the
County, through contractual agreement, has 1.95 MGD and 3.0 MGD of purchased
capacity at the City of Monroe WWTP and Charlotte's McAlpine Creek WWTP
respectively.
Public Works' Mission Statement is as follows:
Develop water, sewer and solid waste infrastructure that supports residential,
commercial, industrial and agricultural needs while meeting Federal/State
regulations and providing our customer base with acceptable levels of service at
cost effective rates
2.0 DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Performance Report the following definitions apply:
• Aerobic — A condition in which atmospheric or dissolved molecular oxygen is
present in the aquatic environment.
• Automatic Telephone Dialer or ATD - A device connected to the telephone
system that will alert programmed telephone numbers of equipment status.
• Biological Nutrient removal — The process of removing nitrogen and
phosphorus from wastewater using biological processes as opposed to chemical
means.
• Biosolids — A primarily organic solid product, produced by wastewater
treatment processes that can be beneficially recycled. The word biosolids is
replacing the word sludge.
• BOD — Biochemical Oxygen Demand — The rate at which organisms use the
oxygen in water or wastewater while stabilizing decomposable organic matter
under aerobic conditions. The BOD Test is a procedure that measures the rate
of oxygen use under controlled conditions of time and temperature. BOD is
typically used to express the "strength" of wastewater.
Union County Wastewater System Page 1 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
• CI-2—Chlorine Residual — The amount of chlorine present in the final effluent
after disinfection. Typically measured in micrograms per liter or milligrams per
liter.
• D.O. — Dissolved Oxygen — Molecular (atmospheric) oxygen dissolved in a
liquid.
• Effluent — Treated wastewater flowing from the treatment system.
• Extended Aeration — A type of wastewater treatment facility in which the
wastewater is retained and treated for a minimum of 24 hours at design flow
before discharge occurs.
• Impeller- A rotating set of vanes in a pump designed to pump or lift water.
• Fecal Coliform — The coliform (bacteria) found in the feces of warm blooded
animals. The presence of coliform-group bacteria is an indication of possible
pathogenic bacterial contamination.
• MGD — Million Gallons per Day — Volumetric measurement of flow converted to
millions. Example .150 MGD x 1,000,000 = 150,000 gallons per day (gpd).
• NH3— Nitrogen as Ammonia — A compound found naturally in wastewater.
The compound is produced by the deamination of organic nitrogen containing
compounds.
• NPDES Permit — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -
Permits, required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of
1972, which regulate discharges to surface waters.
• pH — The expression of the intensity of the basic or acidic condition of a liquid.
• Pump Station —A holding tank with pumps that forces wastewater uphill when
flow by gravity is not possible.
• SBR — Sequencing Batch Reactor — A type of wastewater treatment facility
that treats and discharges water in batches as opposed to continuous flow.
• Telemetry — A system by which information pertaining to remote equipment
status is transmitted via radio waves to a central location.
• TSS — Total Suspended Solids — Particles suspended in a liquid.
• Turbidity — The measurement of the clearness or cloudiness of a liquid.
Union County Wastewater System Page 2 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
3.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
(Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
During the 2001-2002 fiscal year the Department of Public Works operated and
maintained a total of six (6) wastewater treatment facilities. Although each Permit
requires facility visitation daily, excluding weekends and holidays, Public Works'
wastewater treatment facilities are checked 7 days per week 365 days per year. All
treatment facilities are equipped with emergency back-up power generators. Each
treatment facility is equipped with either telemetry or an automated telephone dialer.
In addition to telemetry or ATD, each facility has both audible and visual trouble
alarms. Wastewater treatment plant staff rotate "call duty" for after hour situations
that may arise.
A brief overview of each facility and Performance Summary Graph for each facility
is provided herein.
3.1 Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. NC0085359. Twelve Mile is an extended aeration facility utilizing
biological nutrient removal and tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via
UV (ultraviolet light). Twelve Mile effluent is discharged into Twelve Mile Creek,
which is part of the Catawba River Basin. The facility is permitted to discharge up to
2.5 MGD of treated wastewater. Twelve Mile is located at 3104 Providence Road
South and serves Waxhaw as well as portions of Indian Trail and Stallings. With
over 3900 effluent monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.9%
compliance with permitted monthly average limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002.
Please refer to Table 3-1.
3.2 Crooked Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. NC0069841. Crooked Creek is an extended aeration facility utilizing
tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via chlorination/dechlorination.
Crooked Creek effluent is pumped over 17,000 feet to discharge into the North Fork
Crooked Creek which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. This facility is
permitted to discharge up to 1.9 MGD of treated wastewater. Crooked Creek is
located at 4015 Sardis Church Road and serves the Indian Trail, Lake Park and
Stallings areas. With over 2600 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained
100% compliance with permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer
to Table 3-2.
3.3 Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NC0072508. Hunley Creek is a Sequencing Batch Reactor.
Disinfection is accomplished via chlorination/dechlorination. Hunley Creek effluent
is discharged into Goose Creek, which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. This
facility is permitted to discharge up to .231 MGD of treated wastewater. Hunley
Creek is located at 6913 Stevens Mill Road and serves the subdivisions of
Shanamara, Hunley Creek and Stevens Mill. With over 1000 monitoring tests
Union County Wastewater System Page 3 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
performed, this facility maintained 99.9% compliance with permitted limits for the
fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-3.
3.4 Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. WQ0011928. Olde Sycamore is an extended aeration facility with
tertiary filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via UV (ultraviolet light). This facility
is permitted to discharge up to .150 MGD of treated wastewater. Olde Sycamore is
located within and serves the Olde Sycamore Golf Community located off Highway
218 and Rock Hill Church Road. Olde Sycamore effluent is discharged to a
manmade impoundment where it is then pumped onto the Olde Sycamore Golf
Course as a source of irrigation. This facility maintained 100% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-4.
3.5 Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NC0069523. Tallwood is an extended aeration facility with tertiary
filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via tablet chlorination. This facility is
permitted to discharge up to .05 MGD of treated wastewater. Tallwood is located
within and serves the Tallwood Subdivision off Brief Road. Tallwood effluent is
discharged to Clear Creek, which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. With over
1200 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.9% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-5.
3.6 Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NC0085812. Grassy Branch is an extended aeration facility with tertiary
filtration. Disinfection is accomplished via UV (ultraviolet light). This facility is
permitted to discharge up to .05 MGD of treated wastewater. Grassy Branch is
located at 1629 Old Fish Road and currently serves the Unionville Elementary,
Piedmont Middle and Piedmont High Schools. Grassy Branch effluent is
discharged to Crooked Creek which lies in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. With
over 950 monitoring tests performed, this facility maintained 99.8% compliance with
permitted limits for the fiscal year 2001-2002. Please refer to Table 3-6.
Union County Wastewater System Page 4 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-1
Twelve Mile Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: NCO085359
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
2.5 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
17 ug/I
BOD5
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov.-Mar.10 pprn
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
Nov. -Mar. 4 ppm
TSS
30 ppm
Fecal
200 m/100ml
DO
> 6 ppm
% Efficiency
100.0%
80.0%4
40.0%
20.0 /o
►. �. �. ►. ►. � �, �. A�, off, ,oti off,
'�?\ Q��G,p� OG��p,QpG' ja�•�0���c PQ��a� �O�
Of nearly 3920 tests performed, Twelve Mile WVVrP maintained
an average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal
year ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 5 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-2
Crooked Creek Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: NCO069841
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
1.900 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
17 u I
BODS
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
Nov.-Mar.10 pprin
NHa
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 ppm
TSS
30ppm
Fecal
200 m/100ml
DO
> 6 ppm
% Efficiency
100.0%
80.0%
60.0 /0 s n <� � ,
20.0 % Mfk z"T1To-r . pxl
0.0% r A M"61
Of nearly 2670 tests performed, Crooked Creek WWTP maintained a
100% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year ending June
2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 6 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-3
Hunley Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit #: NCO072508
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.231 MGD
H, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
Cl2
20 ugA
BODE
30 PpM
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 pprn
TSS
30 pprn
Fecal
200 m/100ml
DO
> 5 ppm
% Efficiency
100.0% - - -"�:
80.0%
0
60.0 /o
,ys- ^CKro
2O.Oo 0 i`� .. `�:'.r��
0.0 /o
JOB �O� R� O�,G, O� O� JO
40
Off'` ao Op 1 e<e
Of nearly 1335 tests performed, Hunley Creek WWTP maintained an
average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year
ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 7 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-4
Olde Sycamore Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit #: WQ0011928
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.150 MGD
pH, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
BODs
10 PPM
NH3
4PPM
TSS
30ppm
Fecal
14 m/100ml
Turbidity
10 NTU
% Efficiency
100.0% �—�
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% nn nn nnnn
`O� D 3D 0� �(�
�y
OG�' � PQ
�Yi ! � '� ��. ��'s�Ah'�`?"�t'��ri�i ''�k "skid tl��•d�� "�'4"� 1,
Of nearly 1200 tests performed, Olde Sycamore WW'rP
maintained a 100% compliance to permitted parameters for
fiscal year ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Pale 8 Performance Summary FY 01-02
Of nearly 1200 tests performed, Olde Sycamore WW'rP
maintained a 100% compliance to permitted parameters for
fiscal year ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Pale 8 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-5
Tallwood Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit #: NCO069523
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.050 MGD
pH, Max.
< 9 SU
Min.
> 6 SU
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 pprn
Nov: Mar. 10 ppm
NH3
(Apr. -Oct.) 2ppm
(Nov.-Mar.)4 ppm
TSS
30ppm
Fecal
200 m/100ml
DO
> 6 pprn
% Efficiency
100.0% ,± yy,, �JJ Yva
a a� AM nat 5 i�� MINININ
° its n% 34L`'r
20 0%
0.0% t ik _n z a. ,NMI
O� 0� O V Oy
�� Q�ogeQ 0'o, p`'-0�<,z"ai
Of over 1240 tests performed, Tallwood WWTP maintained an
average 99.9% compliance to permitted parameters for fiscal year
ending June 2002.
Union County Wastewater System Page 9 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
TABLE 3-6
Grassy Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit#: NC0085812
Fiscal Year: 2001-2002 Effluent Limits
Parameter
Limit
Flow
0.050 MGD
pH, Max.
< 9su
Min.
> 6SU
C12
17 ug/l
BODs
(Apr. -Oct.) 5 ppm
(Nov: Mar.)10 ppm
NF13
(Apr. -Oct.) 2 ppm
(Nov. -Mar.) 4 ppm
TSS
30 ppm
Fecal
200 gm/100ml
DO
>: 6 ppm
% Efficiency
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
PAS
20.0%
0.0%
115� -A' 1 11�< S� V , A'
0 0 �a0��
�z
Of 955 tests performed, Grassy Branch maintained an average
99.8% compliance to permitted parameters for
fi
scal year ending
June 2002.
Note: No flow for month of July 2001 due to school summer
vacation.
Union County Wastewater System Page 10 Performance Summary FY 0 1-02
fi

August 2002
4.0 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT
Biosolids are managed and disposed of in accordance with Permit No. WQ
0007486 issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Biosolids are stored at both the Crooked Creek and Twelve Mile Creek
WWTP's. The solids are aerobically digested and then applied as "fertilizer" to
permitted sites. The solids are considered stabilized, and thus suitable for land
application, when the volatile solids content is reduced by 38%. If this 38% volatile
solids reduction can not be achieved, then alkaline stabilization, injection or
incorporation is employed to ensure Permit compliance. The biosolids program was
compliant with all applicable rules for the 2001-2002 fiscal year.
5.0 SYNOPSIS OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
(Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Currently the Department of Public Works operates and maintains over.60
wastewater pumping stations and nearly 320 miles of pipe with approximately
12,000 connections. The pumping stations are equipped with both audible and
visual alarms. In addition to audible and visual alarms, many stations are equipped
with ATD's or telemetry. All stations without ATD's or telemetry are checked daily,
including weekends and holidays. Pump stations with ATD's or telemetry are check
once per week at a minimum. Emergency back-up power is available via a
combination of permanent and portable generators. Wastewater collection staff
rotate "call duty" for after hour situations that may occur.
Public Works maintains emergency response equipment in a ready state at all
times. This emergency equipment varies in nature from spare electrical parts and
plumbing supplies to vacuum trucks and backhoes. Worker safety is of utmost
importance. Safety equipment such as night lighting, gas monitors, and reflective
cones/signs are also maintained in a ready state.
Public Works has ongoing programs to identify and correct problems associated
with the inflow and infiltration of storm water into the sanitary sewer system.
Additionally, Public works has ongoing programs to inspect and clean sanitary
sewer lines.
During the Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the County's wastewater system collected and
conveyed for treatment in excess of 1.3 billion gallons. Of the 1.3 billion gallons of
wastewater handled, 12 spills with a combined estimated volume of 1.8 million
gallons spilled from the system. A brief description of each spill is presented below:
➢ On October 29, 2001 Union County personnel responded to a report of a
sanitary sewer overflow off Mclendon Drive in Stallings. Public works staff
removed concrete and miscellaneous construction debris from the sewer line.
An estimated 400,000 gallons of wastewater entered a wet weather tributary of
Union County Wastewater System Page 11 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
Davis Mine Creek. Twelve (12) fish were retrieved from a quarter mile stretch of
the creek. Public Works staff dammed Davis Mine Creek with sandbags in an
effort to contain the spill. In excess of 384,000 gallons of wastewater was
pumped back into the sewer system. Lime was spread over the affected area as
part of the remediation efforts. The spill was not of magnitude to cause
endangerment to human health. The North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality was notified of the incident.
➢ On January 20, 2002 at 9:30AM a sanitary sewer overflow was discovered at
manhole 13 in the Trellis Subdivision. Upon investigation it was determined that
the spill was caused by a power failure at the Trellis pump station. As a result of
the spill, 630 gallons of untreated wastewater entered an unnamed tributary of
Ray's Fork. The area was remediated and lime was spread on the affected
area. A report was submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
➢ On. January 23, 2002 at approximately 8:00 AM and ending at approximately
1:30 PM on January 26, 2002 an estimated 835,00 gallons of wastewater and
storm water combined spilled from a portion of the of the Union County Sewer
System. The estimated volume is cumulative and is the result of a series of
intermittent wastewater spills that occurred within a contiguous system serving
portions of Eastern Union County. The intermittent spills were the direct result of
storm water from heavy area rains entering the sewer system. All wastewater
pumps and associated equipment were operating properly and at capacity.
Untreated wastewater entered both Rays Fork and New Salem Branch in the
Marshville\Wingate area. Stream samples taken during the event indicated that
wastewater was not present in sufficient quantity to result in the immediate
endangerment of human health or the environment. Public Works staff
monitored the sites "around the clock". Remediation efforts at the spill sites
included the removal and proper disposal of paper and plastic products and the
spreading of lime (lime is used to neutralize pathogenic organisms and the like).
Public Works has an ongoing program to identify and correct any defects in the
wastewater system that would result in storm water entering. The North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately 12:30AM on February 7, 2002 and ending at
approximately 12:15AM on February 9, 2002, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County sewer system. The spill is
attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 509,565 gallons spilled from
a manhole off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Rays Fork. All
wastewater pumps and associated equipment was operating properly and at
capacity. Public Works diverted all available resources to the area in an effort to.
determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system. Based on
the findings, appropriate corrective actions are being taken. Stream samples
taken 2\7\02, and follow up samples taken 2\12\02, indicated that the spill posed
Union County Wastewater System Page 12 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
no immediate risk to human health or the environment. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately at 8:00 PM on March 2, 2002 and ending
approximately 2:40 PM on March 3, 2002, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County Sewer System. The spill
is attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 89,800 gallons spilled
from a manhole off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Ray's Fork. All
wastewater pumps and associated equipment was operating properly and at
capacity. Public Works diverted all available resources to the area in an effort to
determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system. Appropriate
corrective actions have been taken. Stream samples taken 3\3\02 indicated that
the spill posed no immediate threat to human health or the environment. The
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality was notified.
➢ Beginning at approximately 8:00 a.m. March 21, 2002 and ending at
approximately 4:00 p.m. on the same day, a combination of storm water and
wastewater spilled from a portion of the Union County Sewer System. The spill
is attributable to heavy rains in the area. An estimated 7,000 gallons spilled
from a manhole located off Walkup Ave. in Monroe. The spill entered Ray's
Fork. All wastewater pumps and associated equipment were operating properly
and at capacity. Public Works diverted all available resources to the area in an
effort to determine the storm waters entry point into the wastewater system.
Appropriate corrective actions have been taken. Stream samples taken the day
of the spill indicated there is no immediate endangerment to human health or the
environment. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality was notified.
➢ On January 5, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurring at manhole #15 on
Lake Park outfall was discovered. An estimated 840 gallons of untreated
wastewater spilled. A build-up of gravel and miscellaneous debris in the sewer
line caused the spill. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of
the State.
➢ On January 30, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow at manhole #9 on Bob White
Circle was reported by a customer. The cause of spill is attributable to the
buildup of grease and solids in sewer line. Approximately 270 gallons spilled on
the roadway and roadside. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter
waters of the State.
➢ On February 12, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the JARRS Pump
Station. The cause of the spill was determined to be a tripped power control
breaker. Approximately 750 gallons spilled around the pump station. The area
was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of the State.
Union County Wastewater System Page 13 Performance Summary FY 01-02

August 2002
➢ On May 31, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the Springhill Pump
Station. Weekend "call" personnel responded to a high-water alarm. The cause
of spill is attributable to low incoming power voltage. Approximately 500 gallons
spilled around the station. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter
waters of the State.
➢ On June 29, 2002 a sanitary sewer overflow occurred at the Springhill Pump
Station. Approximately 300 gallons spilled around the station. The cause of the
spill is attributable to area thunderstorms and consequential loss of incoming
power. The area was remediated. The spill did not enter waters of the State.
If there are questions or comments about this report, please contact the Union
County Public Works Department at [phone].
Union County Wastewater System Page 14 Performance Summary FY 01-02

J�
ty
FqCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
February 14, 2003
Mr. David L. Guy
Starwood Carolina LLC
11520 North Community House Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina
RE: Approval to Modify
Quellin Subdivision Dam
Inventory Number: Union-085
Union County, N. C.
Dear Mr. Calloway:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
"!VISION OF LAND RSS;�Ip e
LAND QUALI TY S,-,^•�
FES 21 2003
DEPARTMENT OF Et -, -, - 1�11Y?tl3G
I!+UD>U{it,+Rfif NESpfIRO;.�
Thank you for the opportunity to review the information regarding the referenced dam. This
information was received in our office on November 8, 2002 under cover letter dated November 7,
2002. Based on our review of this information, our office concurs that a low hazard classification is
presently warranted based on the proposed modifications to the existing dam and downstream areas,
and thus, an exemption can be granted.
However, the following comments are offered:
The Pond Modifications plan for the dam indicates that the emergency spillway
(trapezoidal earthen channel) will be located in fill and is also activated even in very
small storm events. It is recommended that the emergency spillway be located outside the
embankment fill and raised to an elevation such that it would not be activated any more
often than the 50-year storm. Also, it is highly recommended that the channel be armored
with non -woven geo fabric, 57 stone and rip rap.
2. The approved Erosion and Sediment Control plans do not address the modification to the
existing dam. A revised Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan may be required.
3. Please note that significant changes to the dam or downstream areas during construction,
beyond those presented in the Pond Modifications plan and Dam Failure Analysis and
Downstream Flood Study, may require that the hazard classification or exempt status be
reevaluated.
Geological Survey • Land Quality - Geodetic Survey
Division of Land Resources - 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919-733-38331 FAX: [phone] Internet: www.dlr.enr. state.nc.us/dlr.htm
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

February 14, 2003
Page 2 of 3
Please contact Mr. Clinton O. Cook, EI, Assistant Regional Engineer, at telephone number (704)
663-1699 or me at [phone] should you have any questions of if we may be of further
assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Maxwell R. Fowler, PE
State Dam Safety Engineer
Land Quality Section
MRF/TVI/COC
cc: Mr. Doug Miller, PE
f 1VIr: Rex _D.-Gleas_o_n, PE
�Mr. Sean T. Calloway, PE

A�A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
`James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
February 19, 2003
Mr. Brad Cardwell
Centex Homes
5350 77 Center Drive, Suite 10C
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
RE: Approval to Impound
Providence Glen Dam
Union County
Catawba River Basin
Dear Mr. Cardwell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
uiVrsroN OF LAND RESUUC
LAND QUALITY SCCrIUy
g Ci��
2001
rC'NT 0,
41m i�',I UR f
h� 0; trf;
This concerns the subject dam you recently modified on a tributary to the
West Fork of Twelve Mile Creek in Union County pursuant to the Approval
to Modify issued on September 17, 2002 as required by the Dam Safety
Law of 1967. "As -built" plans and the engineer's certification were
received on January 10, 2003 for all work except the piezometer
installations. The piezometer installations were subsequently certified on
February 14, 2003 by Mr. Christopher J.L. Stahl, PE. Also, Check No.
227489 for $1443.56 serving as the additional application processing fee
was received on January 10, 2003.
Land Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office made a final
inspection of this dam on January 28, 2003. The dam was found to be in
general conformance with the approved plans and specifications except
that the piezomenters had not been installed. These were subsequently
installed and certified by Mr. Christopher J.L. Stahl, PE. On receiving the
piezometer certification by email on February 14, 2003, 1 gave verbal
approval to begin impounding water. This letter serves as written
confirmation that the Approval to Impound is issued.
A healthy stand of perennial grass shall be established on all graded
areas. Any erosion features that develop shall be repaired.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 0919-733-4574 / FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 1a 60/ Post`Consumer Paper

Mr. Cardwell
February 19, 2003
Page 2
The Land Quality Section staff will make periodic inspections of this dam
to assure that the dam is being maintained in good operating condition.
Th'et'& insoections, however, will be relatively infrequent. It is advised that
you` closely„ inspect and monitor your dam, and that you notify your
engineer and the Division of Land. Resources if you see or suspect any
problems_ concerning its safety.
Sincerely,
Maxwell R. Fowler, PE
cc Mr. Christopher J.L.Stahl, PE
MTFReI eason; PEA
Mr. G. Douglass Miller, PE

J
Roger Spach
From: _ Roger Spach
Sept: Monday, January 27,. 2003 8:14. AM
To: Barry Shearin (E-mail); Bill Baird (E-mail);. Bill Brewer (E-mail); Brenda Welborn (E-mail);
Callie Dobson (E-mail); Caorl M. Patrick (E-mail); Carol Hamilton (E-mail); Carol Rogers (E-
mail); Carol Rogers (E-mail); Carol Rogers (E-mail); Carol Rogers (E-mail); Carol, Rogers (E-
mail); Carol Rogers (E-mail); Darlene Kucken (E-mail); Dave Casner (E-mail); David
Saunders (E-mail); Donna Davis (E-mail); Eric Rogers (E-mail); Gisele Comer; Greg Greene
. (E-mail); Hal Bryson (E-mail); Jason Walser (E-mail); Jason Walser (E-mail); Jay Sauber (E-
mail); Jeff Dennard (E-mail); Jim Behmer (E-mail); John Mease (E-mail); John Melvin (E
mail); John Murdock (E-mail); John Ritchie (E-mail); John Vest (E-mail); Johnny Wear (E-
mail); Jon C. Dyer (E-mail); Kathy Southern (E-mail); Kelly Craver (E-mail); Ken Chavis (E-
mail); Kenneth Gentry (E-mail);,Kevin Redding (E-mail); Kim Hinson (E-mail); Larry Ausley
(E-mail); Larry Coble (E-mail); Lauren Elmore (E-mail); Leon Gatewood"(E-mail); Mark Tye
(E-mail); Melani Byrd (E-mail)- Michael Parker (E-mail); Michael Swan (E-mail); Michelle
Woolfolk (E-mail); Mike Lamberth (E-mail); Ray Furr (E-mail); Ray Furr (E-mail); Ray Furr
(E-mail); Ray Furr (E-mail); Ray Furr (E-mail); Ray Furr (E-mail); Ron Hargrove (E-mail); .
Ron Lewis (E-mail); Russ Colbath (E-mail); Scott Frederick (E-mail); Scott Fredricks (E-
mail); -Shannon.Thornburg (E-mail); Stan Webb (E-mail); Stephen Lamb (E-mail); Steve
Cibik (E-mail); Steve Levitas (E-mail); Steve.Raybum (E-mail); Tim Fitzgerald (E-mail);
Todd Kennedy (E-mail); Wess Hare (E-mail); Wilce Martin (E-mail)
Subject: Yadkin Pee-dee River Basin Association Meeting January 31, 2003
>A'Reminder that the YPDRBA meeting scheduled to be held on January 17 was postponed until
iJanuary 31 at-10:30 A.M.. It will be hosted by Union County. Directions are given below.
Directions
> From Charlotte:. Take Hwy 74 east'to Monroe. Exit right at the second
> overpass to Highway 601 North, Hwy 20.0 south (aka Skyway Dr).. At the top of
> the exit ramp turn right. At the 4'th traffic light (:9 miles from 74),
> Union County Court House will be on the right. Turn left onto Church
> Street. The Public Works Building is the second.building on the left, 400
>. North Church St.
> From Concord: Take Highway'.601.south to Monroe. Highway 601 croses over
> Highway 74.. After crossing Highway 74 continue straigth. (now on Highway
> 2.00 South, Skywway.Drive). At the 4'th traffic light _(.9 miles from 74),
> Union County Court House will be on the right. Turn left onto Church
> Street. The .Public Works Building is the second building on.the left, 400
> North Church St.
j_ > From the East: Take Highway.64 to Monroe.. Exit right,at the first overpass
> to Highway 601 north,now Highway 200 South, Skyway Dr. At the top of the
> ramp; turn left, crossing over Highway 74. At the 41th traffic light (.9
1..> miles from 74), Union ounty Court House -will be on the_,right. Turn left
> onto Church Street.,. -The Public Works Building is the.second building. on the
> left, 400 North Church St....`
Mail:
0 0 GV LLE PEOIOWAL UN'RaE
UK 2 9 2003

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Nr
Cfi�'wT.
,
June 26, 2002 i�RGC f '' ,_;a; <«,oi, C
Jon C. Dyer
Union County Public Works
400 North Church Street JUL 0 2 2002
Monroe, NC 28112-4804
Re: Union County Wastewater Improvements, Project Number 1102
Dear Mr. Dyer:
We appreciate your patience in the review of the Endangered Species survey conducted by the Catena Group during April
2002. The submitted report was reviewed by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(F&WS).
The WRC and F&WS concur with the findings of the survey. A continued commitment to the use of appropriate measures to
minimize impacts to aquatic health and remaining mussel populations in the creek as outlined in the biological conclusion
section of the report is critical to the continued health of the Crooked Creek ecosystem. WRC is particularly concerned with
how the High Quality Water sedimentation and erosion control measures will be implemented at the crossing site, and what the
schedule may be for the routine inspections of the pipeline. Please share with the WRC any details regarding additional
precautions taken to ensure that'potential spills are avoided or contained.
The F&WS is particularly concerned about the impacts to other mussel species in the direct vicinity of the crossing, and in the
downstream plume of the disturbed site. The Federal species of concern, the Carolina creekshell and the Savannah lilliput are of
particular interest to the F&WS. The F&WS desires to have the biologist who performed the study for the Catena Group on site
during the construction so that if additional mussel populations are identified, they can be successfully relocated out of the
disturbed area.
Officials from WRC would like to be present for the construction of the crossing, particularly the first day of the construction
activities. Please coordinate directly with WRC officials to arrange site visits during the construction activities. When a date is
agreed to, please notify me of this date in order to re -cord the activity in the file.
Finally, the Division appreciates the cooperative spirit expressed by the County in working through this issue. It is important,
however, to consider any and all mitigative measures utilized at this specific creek crossing for future work in this watershed.
The mitigative measures included in this project when implemented in other projects throughout this watershed will provide
valuable benefits to the overall quality and health of the Crooked Creek drainage system.
If there is anything I can assist you with, please do not hesitate .to give me a call at [phone], ext. 366.
A
erel
i�r"
Milt Rhodes
Watershed Planner
cc: r__Rex Gleason,_bWQMooresvilldRegionaI-0_f_ficel
John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Kim Colson, DWQ Non -discharge Permitting Unit
Mark Cantrell, US Fish and,Wildlife, Asheville Office
Danielle Pender, Wildlife Resources Commission
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

aQ Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
f i Z Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
GROUNDWATER SECTION
June 5, 2002
- 11 I III I I:
Parkdale America, LLC #21
Post Office Box 37
Mineral Springs, North Carolina 28103
Attention: Shane Trull, Plant Manager
RE: Notice of Violation of Permit Conditions
Permit N° WQ0007199
Union County, N.C.
Dear Trull:
A review of the subject permit and your April 2002 compliance monitoring data indicates
that you are in violation of the following permit condition:
Permit Condition N° IV.1- If Total Organic Compounds (TOC) concentrations greater than
10 mg/L are detected in any downgradient well, additional sampling and analysis must be
conducted to identify individual constituents comprising this TOC.
The TOC concentrations in downgradient wells MW-2 and MW-3 _were above 10 mg/L.
You are requested to resample all the monitoring wells for TOC within 30 days. If TOC is above
10 mg/L in any well, you are requested to collect and analyze samples for volatile and semi -volatile
organic compounds using Methods 6230D and 625 respectively. Please submit the results for this
sampling and analysis to the Mooresville Regional Office within 30 days of sampling. It should be
noted that the violations cited above and any additional documented violations could result in the
initiation of an enforcement action by this Office in accordance with General Statute 143-215.6A,
which provides for a $10,000 assessment of civil penalties for each violation. Each day that the
violation continues may be considered a separate violation.
MCDENR
Customer Service Division of Water Quality / Groundwater Section
1 800 623-7748 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Internet: http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us

Parkdale Mills
June 5, 2002
Page Two
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, contact Peggy Finley at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Matthew J. Heller, P.G.
Regional Groundwater Supervisor
cct=Rex.:Crleasori - Mooresville Water Quality Section
Groundwater Section, Permits and Compliance Unit - Raleigh
MAF/parkdale.nov

O�O� W ArFRQG (� ,�,/ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
> Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 30, 2002
Mr. William Hood, Owner
Details Unlimited
721 Charlotte Avenue
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Subject: Illegal Discharge
Details Unlimited
Union County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Hood:
Attached is a copy of the Report of Investigation prepared by Wes Bell of this Office regarding the
discharges of washwater that were reported to this office on April 16, 2002.
This report is not being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because no discharges of
washwater could be found at the time of the investigation. However, you indicated that previous
washwater discharges had occurred without proper containment and disposal. Please be advised that
NCGS 143-215.6A provides for a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000.00), or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation, per day when the violation is of a
continuing nature, against any person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required
by NCGS 143-215.1. Penalties may also be assessed for any damage to the surface waters of the State that
may result from the unpermitted discharge.
As noted in the complaint investigation *report, your facility has access to the city sewer --system;
therefore, the washwater discharges from your business need to be disposed in the city sewer system.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at [phone]. -
Sincerely,
D. Rle�xG�l /aso, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Union County Health Department
20.
I NIL-1aE
N. C. Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT OF: Complaint Investigation
DATE OF INVESTIGATION: May 6, 2002
INVESTIGATED BY: Wes Be111')PTIME SPENT: 4.0 hours
PLACE VISITED: Details Unlimited
PHYSICAL LOCATION: Monroe, Union County
MAILING ADDRESS: 721 Charlotte Avenue
Monroe, N.C. 28110
TELEPHONE #: [phone]
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin -Pee Dee
PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Mr. William Hood, Owner
REASON FOR VISIT: Investigation of complaint regarding discharge of vehicle washwater.
COPIES TO: Union County Health Department
REPORT:
On April 16, 2002, this Office received a report that vehicle washwater was being
discharged into a creek from the Details Unlimited business site in Monroe, Union County. The
complaint was investigated by Wes Bell of this office on May 6, 2002.
Mr. Bell met with Mr. Hood at the Details Unlimited business site. According to Mr.
Hood, vehicles are washed adjacent to his shop without collection or proper treatment/disposal of
the washwater. The washwater flows over a paved surface approximately 40 to 60 feet into a
creek. No vehicle washing was occurring at the time of the inspection. According to Mr. Hood,
the business site has access to the city sewer system.
Mr. Hood's business includes a mobile washing service. Mr. Bell advised Mr. Hood of
the Division's policy regarding mobile.washing operations. Mr. Hood was informed of the
violation of environmental law regarding the discharge of washwater without adequate collection
and disposal. In addition, Mr. Bell suggested that Mr. Hood collect and dispose of the washwater
in the city's sewer system. Mr. Hood was very courteous and helpful throughout the
investigation. A follow-up investigation may be necessary to verify that adequate collection and
disposal of the vehicle washwater has been implemented.

/ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
J I Gregory J..Act ng Director
Division of Water Quality
i
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
NCDOT
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
IRE: Monroe Bypass; R-2559 B&C
Union County
DWQ# 02-0672
May 7, 2002
NND
MAY 1 0 2002
DWQ received the application for the above mentioned project on Apri129, 2002. We will begin our
eview and processing of this application. However please be aware that DWQ cannot complete processing of
this application until we receive a copy of the Public Notice issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers and 2)
the issues relating to cumulative impacts are -adequately addressed as discussed in our meeting on April 9, 2002.
DWQ is committed to working with you, the City of Monroe, Union County and your consultants to
address the cumulative impact issue. As agreed in our April 8 meeting, we will need copies of all relevant local
existing stormwater and related land use management programs. To date we have not received these materials.
Please send three (3) copies of this information to me so.we can accelerate this process.
I can be reached at 919-733-9464 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
e)lL XaL,TfA
John Dorney
Water Quality Certification Program
cc: Mike -Parker; DWQ--Mooresville Regional Office'
Milt Rhodes, WQ Planning
Steve Lund, Asheville Corps of Engineers
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ
Central Files
File Copy
AMA
MEW
N. C. Division of water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)'
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),(http://h2o.einr.state.nc.us/newetiands

��r
a =
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
NG DEPT. OF E�JVI;-(MAIC-9T
61A10 k-R: -1.i-
May 1, 2002 6 (;t�I S`J?l.= — v-Fi('r.
HAND DELIVERED N _N
Dr. John R. Sheaffer
Sheaffer International - Marshville LLC
40 Shuman Boulevard, Suite 201
Naperville, Illinois 60563
MAY 0 3 2002
Dear Dr. Sheaffer:�.-
4' Pria T__. .
You are hereby notified that in accordance with the North Carolina Clean Water Act of 1999, S.L. 1999 c. 329, s.
11.2, an application for coverage under a Wastewater Collection System Permit for your SHEAFFER INTERNATIONAL
collection system must be submitted. Upon receipt of this letter, your facility has sixty (60) days to submit the attached .
application and all supporting documentation (15A NCAC 2H .0227). Failure to submit the application as required may
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due
date of the application.
This permit is for the operation and maintenance of your collection system. The person responsible for the .
wastewater collection system should review and complete this application and review the permit shell. This application and
draft permit shell are available electronically on our web site at http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/ndpuapps.htmi. It is
suggested that the permit shell be reviewed in preparation for completing the permit application as the information requested
is used by the Division to determine the current status of the collection system operation and maintenance program and
additional steps that may be necessary to achieve compliance with this permit. The original application signed by an
authorized signing official, two copies of the signed application and three copies of any attachments must be returned to
I complete the application package (i.e. all application materials submitted in triplicate). Please note the requirements for an
authorized signing official on the last page of the application. If you are the mayor or manager, you are the authorized signing
official for this applicationunless otherwise delegated. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTN: M. Doklovic
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Marie Doklovic at [phone] extension 371 or E-
mail at [e-mail]. You may also contact Rex Gleason with the Mooresville. Regional Office at (704) 663-
1699.
Enclosure
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville RegionaliOffice
Sincerely,
for Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
RM
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
DENR Customer Service Center
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax _(919) 715-6048
Telephone [phone]

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
April 22, 2002
John Wheland Homes of N.C., Inc.
8325-D Arrowridge Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
RE: Wheland Homes Subdivision Dam
Union County
Catawba River Basin
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the information regarding the proposed
dam. This information was received in our office on March 4, 2002.
Before beginning construction work on the referenced dam, 5 sets of plans and
specifications for construction work must be filed with the Division of Land Resources
for approval pursuant to Title I5A, Subchapter 2K of the North Carolina Administrative
Code.
Please -contact Clinton Cook or me at telephone number [phone] should
you have any questions concerning this matter. We look forward to receiving final
design documents from you.
Sin Alk
-G. ouglas ler, P. E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
COC/
cc: Mr. James D. Simons, P.G., P.E.
Mr.-D.-Rex Gleason, P.E.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

�OF W ATF9Q � Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
'OA(�1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
p Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 17' 2002 OID ! 14TURAL RFSt:i RCE-
P:dnfa.`°I
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Department of Transportation
P D and E A Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Subject: Project: US 74 Monroe Bypass
TIP #: R-2559 B and C
County: Union
I
APR 1 8 2002
SL
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(NCWRP) is willing to accept payment for stream and wetland impacts associated with the subject project.
Please note that the decision by the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not
assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of
Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to
determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit and 401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you, the stream restoration that is necessary to satisfy the
compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum
amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet)
Wetland
(acres)
Riparian Buffer
(ft2)
Impact
7,375
6.75
Mitigation Maximum
14,750
13.50
The stream and wetland mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality
Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit
03040105 of the Yadkin River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the
Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal Braswell at (919)
733-5208.
Sincerely,
M w
Ronald E. Fe ell,
Program Manager
cc: Rob Ridings, Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Lund, USACOE
-- _._
CRex�Gleason,_MRO
file
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 [phone] Customer Service
320 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Fax: [phone] 623-7748
BENE

GOULSTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
...............................................................
THE LEADER IN FIBER LUBRICANT TECHNOLOGY
V, February 15, 2002
Reference: Reported discharge and subsequent corrective actions
Ms. Dee Browder
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
919 N Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Ms. Browder:
Introduction :
FEB 9 2002
This report details the reported discharge on February 11, 2002 at Goulston Technologies, Inc. Goulston
personnel discovered and reported a discharge into Bearskin Creek on above date at approximately 8:30
am. Flow of process discharge was stopped immediately by Goulston personnel. This discharge was
reported to Wes Bell at NCDENR at 10:45 am.
Investig_ation and Actions:
Goulston's Maintenance personnel investigated and determined the cause of the discharge to be a leaking
underground process sewer pipe. Goulston's process sewer discharge consists of distilled water with
< 1000 ppm soluble detergents and organics from wastewater treatment processing, as well as city water
from demineralized water manufacturing. The sewer pipe connects to the City of Monroe's sewer system.
The leaking water entered an underground storm sewer which discharges to the shores of Bearskin Creek.
Oil absorbent booms were placed at the edge of Bearskin Creek at the point of entry. Two dead fish were
recovered inside the oil boom area. Hazy water was collected and pumped into containers and returned to
Goulston's wastewater treatment system for processing. Approximately 550 gallons were collected. The
underground pipe was located and the source was found to be a rubber connection sleeve to a concrete
manhole. The old manhole and old pipe were removed and discarded. The pipe was replaced with welded
stainless steel pipe. The new pipe was joined to the existing main pipe via ductile iron repair coupling. A
form was constructed and the.entire coupling was encapsulated with epoxy concrete to eliminate the
potential for future leaks. The pipe work was completed and process sewer flow resumed on February 14,
2002. At Goulston's request, Pace Analytical was contracted to measure dissolved oxygen in the creek.
The results are attached.
Conclusions:
This discharge was the result of age deterioration of the manhole connection sleeve. By eliminating the
manhole and the rubber connections, the potential for leaks has been drastically reduced. Goulston expects
no such events in the future.
Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Regards,
O.
Veronica Mc
HSE Manager
Enclosures
0 N. Johnson St., Monroe, NC 28110, USA Phone [phone] Fax [phone] http://www.goulston.com
Box 5025, Monroe, NC 28111-5025, USA

.Feb,15 2002:; 8:55AW. 'PACE ANALYTICAL
aceAnal]ffical
www.pacelabs,com
Goulston Technologies
700 N. Johnson St.
Monroe. NC 28110
Attn: Ms Veronica Mcki,nhiy
Phone: [phone]:,;•`•
No,3982 P. 2/6
Lab Project Number: 9230194
Client Project ID: Field
Pace Analytical Services, Inc,
980010nceyAvenue, Suite 100
Nuntersville, NO 28078
Phone: [phone]
Fax.- 704,875.9091
Lab Sample.:N6- 922089883
Project Sample Number: 9230194-001 Date Collected: 02/12/02 14:15
Client••Sample ID: DRAIN OUTFALL
Matrix: Water
Date Received: 02/12/02 16:30
'Parameters
Results
Units Reoort Limit Analyzed
CAS No, Ftnote Reg Limit
"Field Services
i Field Grab Data
Method:
Collected 8y
CJF
02/12/02
CJF
Collected Date
02/12/02
02/12/02
CJF
Collected Time
14.15
02/12/02
CJF
Field pH
7.54
Std., Units 02/12/02
CJF
Field Dissolved Oxygen
10.30
mg/l 02/12/02
CJF
Date. 02/14/02
Laboratory Certification IDs REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
NO Wastewater 12 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
NO Drinking Water 37706 without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc,
SC 99006
�a0 p aCEp�q��
ow!■ 11�1�
Page. 1
Labors Certification IDS
KY Drinking Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 213
FL NELAP E87627

.Feb .15. 2002" 8:56W."'-PACE ANALYTICAL
�.f.',i{9• r
aceAnalyticafm
www,paceiabs.com
No.3982 P. 3/6
Lab Project Number: 9230194
Client Project ID: Field
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800ftceyAvenue, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Phone_ 704.875.9092
Fax. - 704,875.9091
Lab Sample No: 922089891
Project Sample Number:
9230194-002 Date Collected: 02/12/02 14:20
Client Sample ID. DOWN STREAM':
Matrix:
Water Date Received: 02/12/02 16:'30
Parameters
Results
Units Report Limit Analyzed CAS No. Ftnote Reg Limit
Fi el d Servi ces , :: •'
Field Grab Data—'..,
Method:
Collected 6jr.'"
CJF
02/12/02
CJF
Col eci e, i;;D�te
02/12/02
02/12/02
CJF
Coll,,e6tbi Time
14:20
02/12/02
CJF
Field pH
7.22
Std.. Units 02/12/02
CJF
;�.Jield Dissolved Oxygen
8 27
mg/1 02/12/02
CJF
N
Date. 02/14/02 Page. 2
t
Laboratory Certification IDs Laboratory Certification IDs.
NO Wastewater 12 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS ati
KY Drinking Water sooso
NO Drinking Water 37706 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full: VA Drinking Water 213
SC 99006 without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. FL NELAP E87627

Jeb.]5, 2002: 8:56AM'`:PACE ANALYTICAL
41
aceAnalyiical""
www.pacolabs.com
5
No,3982 P. 4/6
Lab Project Number: 9230194
Client Project ID: Field
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800KinceyAvenue, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Him.- 704.875,9092
Fax:[phone]
Lab Sample No: 922089909
Project Sample Number:
9230194•.003 Date Collected: 02/12/02 14,28
Client Sample ID: UP STREAM-";.,
p
Hatrix:
Water Date Received. 02/12/02 16:30
Parameters
Results
Units Report Limit Analyzed CAS No. Ftnote Rea Limit
Field Services-'
Field Grab Data:•;..•
Method:
Collected By.
CJF
02/12/02
CJF
Col Iecred,l)ate
02/12/02
02/12/02
CJF
Collected Time
14:28
02/12/02
CJF
F-Iel-d pH
7.13
Std. Units 02/i2/02
CJF
''Field Dissolved Oxygen
10 39
mg/l 02/12/02
CJF
Date. 02/14/02
Laboratory Certlflcation IN REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
NC Wastewater 12
NC Drinking Water 37706 This report shall not be reproduced, except In full,
SC 99006 without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
0 - CO,
Page. 3
Laboratory Certificatlon IDS
KY Drinking Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 213
FL NELAP E87627

,Feb,lS, 2002>p 8;56AM•'`�'-PACE ANALYTICAL No.3982 P. 5/6
e,}'
+, +; Pace Anoiytical Services, Inc.
5 9800 KinceyAvenue, Suite 100
aceAr�aly ical Huntersville, NC 26078
„'• ; Phone., 704, 875.9092
www.paceiabs.cam . ' ' ` ' Fax: 704.875,9091
Lab Project Number: 9230194
Client Project I0: Field
PARAMETER FOOTNOTES
ND Not detected at,•or above adjusted reporting limit
NC Not Calculable'
J Estimated: "cgncentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit
:l.
I
Date. 02/14/02
Laboratory Certification IDs
NC Wastewater 12 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
' NC D[Inking Water 37706 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Sc 99006 without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
e
Page. 4
Laboratory Certification IN
KY Drinking Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 213
FL NELAP E87627

/�a�eA_
nalytical
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY I Analytical Request Document
The Chairt-o/-Custody is a LEGAL DocumENT All relevant -treids mast Wc-ompleted accurately,
T
Required Client Intcrrrration Section A Required Client tnforrnatbri Section B Page: j of To Be Completed by Pace Anatptiml and Client Section C o
Caraparry Report To: Quote REference
Gn I
Teel „ Client lnlormatirn Check uoWcorin :
Ad&ess
Wo313e To:
REquested Du© Data:
'TAT
ProjW Manager
SN0
P.O.
• Turnaround times less tlran 14 daps subject to
Project R.
l3baratory and contraclual ottigatiaws arid map result in a
F1ush Turnaround Surcharge.
Pr•:ject Name:
Profile a.
Turn kouni Tim ITAT) h caIsndar days.
Fhr,ne
`
V
Project Nunbor
RequcsDad An2rtysis: a
�
Section C Required Client Inlorriaticn:
Valid Matrix Cudes.l
-
p
p
Preservatives
-
_Il1ATRnr CODE
WATER, V!T
w
w
w �
W
w
w 1-
W
�
0, Y
o
SAMPLE I D
Solt SL
a
a
�
�-0
OIL OL
U
o _
.J.1
c
Z
�'
49
One character per box. -
1NIPE WP
AIR AR
-x
O
O
o
o
m
W
(A-Z, 0-9 / -)
WSSUE TS
Q
U
c
C,
Z
U
O
m
a
�f
F
Sample IDs PAUST BE UNIQUE
OTHER oT
2
mm 1 dd 1 yy
hh: mm alp
=
z
Z
Z
Remarks / Lab ID a
i u a o
��
.a
ion R;ta
,�
40
4:
max,-
1
;v
.OL30-:.
Sample Condition
Sample Plotes Itern PIO. Re 11 nq LI is hed 3 y Com pan V
Date
Tim Accepted By Q jDate JTirne
Temp in 'C.
Received on jCE.
Y / N
Sealed Cooler:
Y / N
T
Samples Intact
Y / N _
Additional Comments: i SAMPLER
Q-
NAh11E AMID SIGNATURE
PRINT
a
NamEA-
?,, 7 - Y' ,rQ N k
or 8A4AP
RATE Signed: Wbl t D YYj
SIGNATURE
2 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS Pace Analytical Services, Ire. Form C0001.02100

Feb X5 02 12:59p
p.i
Veronica McKinney
GOVLSTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Health.
ep BoxgpZS Environmental Manager
Monroe, NC 28111-5025 LISA
704-2894464 FAX [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Ms_ Dee Browder
Company: NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Fax No. 704-663-6040
From: Veronica McKinney
0
Total Pages: 7
Date: February 15, 2002
Subject: Reported. discharge and subsequent corrective actions
A copy of the report detailing the reported discharge on February 11, 2002 at Goulston Technologies,
Inc. is attached. You will receive the original report by mail.
Should you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to calf me at 704-289-6464.
Regan s,
Veronica McKinney
Health, Safety & Environmental Manager
M

Feb ,15 02 01:00p p.2
GOULSTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
......................................TEELEADERINFIBERLUBRICANTTECHNOLOGY
February 15, 2002
Reference: Reported discharge and subsequent corrective actions
Ms. Dee Browder
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
919 N Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Ms. Browder:
Introduction :
This report details the reported discharge on February 11, 2002 at Goulston Technologies, Inc. Goulston
personnel discovered and reported a discharge into Bearskin Creek on above date at approximately 8: i0
am, flow of process discharge was stopped immediately by Goulston personnel. This discharge was
reported to Wes Bell at NGDENR at 10:45 am.
Investigation and Actions:
Goulston's Maintenance personnel investigated and determined the cause of the discharge to be a leaking
underground process sewer pipe. Goulston's process sewer discharge consists of distilled water with
< 1000 ppm soluble detergents and organics from wastewater treatment processing, as well as city -water
from demineralized water manufacturing. The sewer pipe connects to the City of Monroe's sewer system.
The leaking water entered an underground storm sewer which discharges to the shores of Bearskin Creek.
Oil absorbent booms were placed at the edge of Bearskin Creek at the point of entry. Two dead fish were
recovered inside the oil boom area. Hazy water was collected and pumped into containers and returned to
Goulston's wastewater treatment system for precessutg. Approximately 550 gallons were collected. The
underground pipe was located and the source was found to be a rubber connection sleeve to a concrete
manhole. The old manhole and old pipe were removed and discarded. The pipe was replaced with welded
stainless steel pipe. The new pipe was joined to the existing main pipe via ductile iron repair coupling. A
form was constructed and the entire coupling was encapsulated with epoxy concrete to eliminate the
potential for future leaks. The pipe work was completed and process sewer flow resumed on February 14,
2002. At Goulston's request, Pace Analytical was contracted to measure dissolved oxygen in the creek.
The results are attached.
Conclusions:
This discharge was the result of age deterioration of the manhole connection sleeve. By eliminating the
manhole and the rubber connections, the potential for leaks has been drastically reduced. Goulston expects
no such events in the future.
Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Enclosures
/00 N. Johnson St., Monroe, NC 28110, USA
PO Box 5025, Monroe, NC 28111-5025, USA
Regards,
yW R•. -
Veronica McKinn
I-ISE Manager 'Vi
Phone [phone] Fax 704:296.6400
hrtp.-//vrw%v.goulston.com
G'�

. Feb .15 02 01:00p
p.3
Feb .15- M 2;- 8:55Alf " P"CE ANALY—ICAL
No•3982 P 2/6
'
FareAnalyflsal ServlGeS, MD.
A80DKInceyAvenUe, Suite 100
,. • �
t
� 1 •,
Huntersvilla, NC 28078
aceAnaly�lcal ; '
Phone: [phone]
www pasefabs.com "
Fez' 704,875.9091
Goulston Technologies "'
Lab Project Number.
9230194
700 N. Johnson St,
Client Project ID:
Field
Monroe. NC 28110
Attn: lis veronica Mctfinney
Phone: [phone]' '
Lab Sampls-N&:' 922089BB3
Project Sample Number: 9230194-001
Date Collected: 02/12/02 14:15
Client.•Samp�le ID: DRAIN OUTFALL
Matrix: Water
Cate Received: 02/12/02 16:30
Parameters Results Units
Report LIWT Analyzed
CAS No. F no a Rea Limit
.,,'."Field Services
- Field Grab Data Hethod:
Collected By CJF
02/12M CJF
Collected Date 02/12/02
02/12/02 CJF
Collected Time 14.15
02/32102 CJF
Field pH 7.54 Std., Units
02/12/02 CJF
Field Dissolved Oxygen 10.30 m911
02112102 CJF
J;
C"
Date. OZ11s102
Laboratory Certification IDs REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
NO Wastewater 12 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
NO Drinidng Water 37706 vAthout the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
SG 99008
�f"147C:71�ts
Page. 1
aboratory Certification IDS
KY Drinking Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 2.13
FL NELAP E87627

Feb. 15 02 01:00p
;p.4
Fab•15• 20,32": 8:5601" }"PACE ANALYTICAL
No•3c82 P- 2/5
�•
PaCe Aaalylleal ServlCO, MC.
>.•
,,:: ;•;;" . • • • :J •
9500 KlnceyAvenoe Suite 700
.
Nunfersville, me 28078
ace AnalyticalN •
Phone: [phone]
wiYw pat818b5.co+er.
Far. 704.875.9091.
Lab Project Number,: 9230194
Client Project ID: Field
Lab Sample No. 922089891
Project Sample Number: 9230194-002
Date Collected: 02/12/02 14:20
Client Sample I0. DOWN STREAM-
Matrix: Water
Date Received, 02/12/02 16:30
Parameters P,esults Units .
Report Limit _ Analyzed
GAS No. Ftnote Reg Limit
Field Services:
Field Grab Data•• Method:
Collected L}q.`• CJF
02/12/02 CJF
Collected bate 02/12/02
021W02 CJF
CalJektW Time 14:20
02/12/oa cil:
Fl-ela pH 7.22 Std. Units
02/12/02 CJF
,�•y5l=ield Dissolved Oxygen 6 27 mg/l
02/12/02 C_IF
•t,f
• . 5
J�
Gate. 02/14/02
Laboratorl Certification 10s REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALY60-31
NC Wastewater Wafer 377Q6 12
rink;n NC Drinking WThis report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
SC 99008 withouttle.wriiten consent of Pace Analytical Services, l:ic..
9
Page. 2
Laboratory Certification IDs
kY Drinking Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 213
FL NELAP E87627

. Feb,15 02 01:00p
p.5
Fab .15. 20127 8:56AM"..",-:0ACE AHALYT!CAL
No,3982 P- 4i6
e.r
..
Pare Aaalyi/cal 8av/ces, Inc.
9800 KfnceyAvenue, Suite 100
ica1
{'``
liuntersville, IVC 2807E
,,.
•:: aceAnal
704.075.5000
' wWw.pacelabs.eom ';
Fax.•704.675.9091
Lab Project Number: 9230194
Client Project ID: Field
Lab Sample NO: 922089909
Project Sample Number: 9230194.003
Date Collected. 0211210E 14.28
Client Sample ID: UP STREAK.."..?
Matrix: Water
Date Received. 02/12/02 16:30
rlx•,
Parameters " "'
Results Units
Report Limit gnalyzed _ _
CAS No. Ftnate Reg Limit
Field Services-:-:.'
Field Grab Data.;'..
Method.
Collected Eft.,"'
CJF
02/12/02 CJF
Collected Date
02/121C2
92/12/02 CJF
Collectid Time
14:28
02/12/02 CJF
Fie1•d•PH
7.13 Std. Units 02/12/02 CJF
;:Field Dissolved oxygen
10 39 mg/l
02/12/02 CJF
I
Date. 02/24/02
P19¢. 3
Laboraton►Cenifleation IN
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALY�
Laboratory. Certification
IDs
NG Wastewater 12
This report shall not be reproduced, except In full,
- KY Drinking Water
VA Drinking Water
90090
213
NC Drinking Water 37706
without the written consent of Pace Analydcal Services. Inc.
FL NELAP
E87627
SC 99006
s

Feb, 15 02 01:00p p.6
. •_feb•• 2G0?�� 8:55AMr� PACE ANALYTICAL NO.3982 P• 5/6
la
Pace MalyticalServices, [no.
.,
9800 li>RceyAvenae, Suite 100
aAnalytical" ' `;; � Nurrtersvflle, NC 28078
ce ";' • hone:704,8759092
;..
• www. pateleDo. ccr� ,, .: = : � Fax: [phone]
Lab Project Nunber: 9230194
Client Project I0: Field
PARAMETER FOOTNOTES ,.•;''';''
ND Not detected ator above adjusted reporting limit
NC Not Calculatiierr"..•
J Estimated'cgncentration above the adjusted method detectlon 1101t and below the adjusted reporting limit
m
Date. 02I14l02
Labom-aty rLgrtificafiori ID s REPORT OF LABORATORY MUMS
NO Wastewatcr 12 This report shall not be reproduced, wept in full,
NO Drinking Water 37708 without the written consent of Paco Analytical Services, Inc.
SC 99006
�r .ecp
Page. c
Laboratoly Certlflcarlon ID&
KY otinkirig Water 90090
VA Drinking Water 213
FL NELAP E67627
9

i
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document
!95ceAnatVtjca1
Trio Charm-o/-Custady is a LEGAL. DoCUMENX An retevantlWds must be compfetedamrafely.
552208
itequired diem lnlcrmvk= Section A Required alent Wwlatlon: Section B Page' of To Be Completed by Peae Arwdjw and aim Section C
Caapery Report To:
Quote Rr(erenea
10) lee t K `
atem Irdarmeticn neck trlcantw
Address
"TAT
ProjcotMenager
ROL
• Turnsrwnd Nmes km llun 14dEgs grge:112
Praiser A '1 l
is omlary andcwtmarwlobllgaEnu and nWmadl in
Idjsft Tumarawd SumfwUp.
L
_
Prajeel N.><nc:
profits M
Tum Aro¢nd lirm ITAT) r calendd daya. -
Fame
Projed M mher.
Raquesbd Analysis:
(
]_ 6
-
q
Section o Required Clidntlnlelelalion:
Yard MRtfix C1.Am.+-
p Ip
Preservallves
•
S IUI V L E I' D
1ATfUR
•1VATER-
SOIL't'.;
Ct7t7E
_ V!T
r.'.' SL'
WQ
W
v
e[ W
W
ulO
W
FI
y
�
•p
a
A
OIL
OL
p�
F'�
c
_
One character per box.
WIFE
AIR
_
WP
AR
Ts
X
9
8
I
= O
(A-z, 0-91 )
a
i
_
z
�' Remarks
Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE
OTHER
CT .
mm l ddl yy
M mm oip
_ _
3
as 1.1 0,2
is
NIT
a
r:
i Temp In'C.
Received on ICE. Y / N
Sealed Cooler: Y / N
Samples Intact Y ! N
Additional Comments:
F,
MAAM
516NRTURE al ;
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
fr$ " k
Pace Analyllml Sere( Inc. Form CDC01 02100
-o

TOWN OF WAXHAW
P. O Box 6 MAYOR
�
ieeu JACK M. HEMBY 317 N. Broome St. —Waxhaw, N.C. 28173
TOWN COMMISSIONERS
Telephone [phone] — Fax [phone] DAVID G. BARNES
WM. GARY UNDERWOOD�
Hours: Mon.-Tues.-Thur.-Fri. — 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. DOY N.,NEWELL
N.C. DEPT. OIL Sy MEICHAEL SIMPSON
Wednesday — 8:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon M Ot�lPilRNT, JJEALt17i flTER E. McMANUS II
iQATIJ! 7 i`?7QCIi�CEM TOWN CLERK
9 .�I BONNIE B. McMANUS
JUL 1 6 1998 TAX COLLECTOR
July 15, 1998 I J�J g� (� V ANNA H. HARTIS
MCCiMllk �c��3�`�,L *1K
Mr. Rex Gleason � .%�
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
The Town of Waxhaw has received several complaints about a house located on 711 Sharon
Drive, Waxhaw (i.e., Tax Parcel # 5-114-82, owned by James & Ruth Wall, 206 Charleston
Street, Monroe, NC 28112). There appears to be some contaminated water (i.e., possibly straight
sewage) running out of a pipe in the front yard into the road right-of-way. Could you investigate
the site to determine what violations may exist.
Call Anthony Roberts or me at [phone] to verify receipt of this letter and to apprise us of
-what steps are being taken ,to address the situation. If needed, one of us can meet you on site to
determine what can be done. Correspondence can be sent to Anthony or me at:
Bill Duston or Anthony Roberts
Centralina Council of Governments
PO Box 35008
Charlotte, NC 28235
Fax: [phone]
Sincerely,
V��
Bill Duston
Waxhaw Town Planner
cc: -Mayor Jack Hemby.
Anthony.Roberts , :

UIV'P 010
GROUND WATER DIVISION T62 y ;
35 00 40
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
SO 34 02
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES.
RECORD OF GROUND WATER POLLUTION SOURCE
RECORD BY: _Michael R. Groves DATE2/10 76W.D. PERMIT NO.
TOWN: Monroe COUNTY: Unigxl
LOCATION (SKETCH ON BACKS: Intersection of SR 1169 and i7S
OWNER(S) OF FACILITY OR INSTALLATION: Rainwater Gas & Oil Co.
TYPE SOURCE: (LAND FILL, LAGOON, ETC) Hydrocarbon Spill
CHARACTER AND QUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS: 7600 gallons of regular. gasoline
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY .(SKETCH ON BACK): Tanker accident during rainstorm. _
Gasoline spilla& into ditch .and flowed into stream. Runoff from rain flushed
gasoline from ditch into stream.
HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS AT SITE : C1ay saprolite, argillite' bedrock
POLLUTION CONFIRMED BY ANALYSIS? no DATE ANALYST:
MONITORING FACILITIES INS-TALLED: no
SAMPLING SCHEDULE:
none
NEAREST STREAM: UT Stewarts Creek DISTANCE 500'
NEAREST WATER SUPPLY WELL: unknown DISTANCE
ANALYSES AND OTHER DATA AVAILABLE:
REM ARKS:- Most of gasoline should be recovered from stream but possibility still
remains for some gasolins to. infiltrate into. bedrock and groundwater.

.� .
�,,
ri
��i
�.
��
� ���
i
�i����f,� �7(1

February 10, 1976
MEMDRANDUM TO: John'C. Murdock, III
Water -Quality Section
FROM: Michael R. Groves
Groundwater Section
SUBJECT: Oil Spill on January 27, 1976
Rainwater Gag and Oil Co.
11nion County
The 7600 gallons of gasoline spilled during the traffic accident
-will probably have little effect on the -groundwater of the area. The
fact that the accident occurred during a rainy period when the top
layer of the soil was saturated and the gasoline ran directly into a
ditch and theca into a creek reduced the chance for infiltration 'into
the ground, It is possible that a small amount will percolate into
the groundwater, but most should be recovered from the stream.
cc: Lee Laymon

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Micheal K. Shalati, Director
Union County Public Works Department
P.O. Box 987
Monroe, NC 28211
A 4
C) E N F1
DEC 23 1997
N'Sla'J f f MWt` N!"I n€gym t""w o"M
Subject: Application No. WQ0014771
Additional Information Request
Southbrook Subdivision, Phase I
Sewer Extension
Union County
Dear Mr. Shalati:
The Non Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. The following items must be addressed before we can complete our review:
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0219 (1) (1), the Division requires that a value of 120 GPD
per bedroom, with a minimum value of 240 GPD per unit, be used to calculate the estimated
volume. of wastewater generated for residential dwelling units (DU). The flow used of 190
GPD/unit is a flow reduction which was allowed only to CMUD facilities. Union County does
not presently have an approval from the Division of Water Quality for a flow reduction.
Therefore, please indicate the specific number of -bedrooms per DU, and recalculate the total
flow volume estimate using this figure. If the recalculated value is different from that originally
calculated, please revise page 2 of your application and forward 3 signed and sealed copies of
that page to my attention.
2. The plans submitted shows a standby emergency generator to be located on site, however a
generator is not mentioned anywhere in the specifications or the application. Please specify
what the intention is of Union County in regards to the inclusion of the on site generator.
Refer to the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. Please
submit two (2) copies of all information to my attention at the address below. Also,
please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before January 23, 1998 will subject
your application to being returned as incomplete, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0208.If you have
any questions on this matter, please call me at [phone] ext. 544.
Si rely,
' / VE
Randy L. Kepler, P.E., Env. Engineer
Non Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: . Mooresville R6gioiial_O' fi(f& Wdfer,QtUity,1
Raid Qubbaj,'BurnellAssociates
Permit File WQ0014771
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

6-
y
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 1997
MEMORANDUM
To: Ruth Swanek
Jim Blose
Through: Jay Saub
From Jim Fisher
Subject: Goose Creek Study
Yadkin River Basin
Subbasin #030712
4IY�Jt;'j �
P.r
DEC k 1997
Attached is a summary of an Intensive Survey conducted on Goose Creek in the
Yadkin River Basin. The study consists of two time -of -travel dye studies, a mid flow study and
a low flow study, with their accompanying physical and chemical data. The stream reach for the
study was from SR 3125 (Mecklenburg Co.) to SR 1547 (Union Co.), a distance of 12 miles.
The mid flow study was conducted on August 5-7, 1997, at a flow of 6.47 cfs in Goose Creek at
US Hwy. 601. The time -of -travel for the mid flow study was 115 hrs. 15 min. (4.8 days) for the
12 mile reach, at an average velocity of 0.16 fps. The low flow study was conducted on August
26-29, 1997, at a flow of 0.96 cfs in Goose Creek at US Hwy. 601. The time -of -travel for the
low flow study was 278 hrs. 15 min. (11.6 days) for the 12 mile reach, at an average velocity of
0.07 cfs. If you have any questions on any of the information provided in the attached report,
please call me at 919 / 733 - 6510.
cc:Rex -C .
Environmental Sciences Branch
Water Quality Section

c
Stevens Creek & Goose Creek
Water Quality Studies
August 1997
Introduction
The Modeling / TMDL Unit of the Water Quality Planning Branch requested an
intensive water quality survey of Goose Creek from its headwaters to its confluence with the
Rocky River at a low flow period of less than 2 cfs at US Hwy. 601 and a mid flow survey
of at least 4 cfs higher. The study reach was from SR 3125 (Mecklenburg Co.) to SR 1547
(Union Co.), a -distance of 12 miles. The data collected is to be used to calibrate a QUAL2E
wasteload model for Goose Creek and similar low -flow streams in the Yadkin 12 (030712)
sub -basin.
Study Dates
• Mid Flow Study on Goose Creek (6.47 cfs. at US Hwy 601) - August 5-7, 1997
• Low Flow Study on Goose Creek (0.96 cfs. at US Hwy. 601)- August 26-29, 1997
Sampling Sites (See Figij;•e 1)
The sampling sites in hydrologic order are as follows:
Station 1 Stevens Creek at SR 3125 (Thompson Road)
Station 1.5 Stevens Creek at confluence with Goose Creek (borders ShannamaraGolfCourse)
Station 2 Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Road)
Station 2.5 Goose Creek at confluence with Stevens Creek (borders Shannamara Golf Course)
Station 2.8 Effluent - Union Co. Hunley Creek WWTP
Station 3 Goose Creek at SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road)
Station 4 Goose Creek at SR 1525 (Mill Grove Church Road)
Station 5 Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Road)
Station 6 Goose Creek at SR 1533 (West Duncan Road) (borders Charlotte National Golf Course)
Station 7 Goose Creek at N.C. Hwy. 218
Station 8 Goose Creek at U.S. Hwy. 601
Station 9 Duck Creek at SR 1600 (Hopewell Church Road)
Station 10 Goose Creek at SR 1547 (Brief Road)

Figure 1 -'
'• � ABARfaU
UNI ' ,• STANL
Mi Hill
M KLENBU
/'
ro
C,
I
10
:
'
s
�
.b
?j8 I OJ
5���a•
o�Q 2 S' /''
8
7
�Q.3 tG • �PP� / L.5 �`�
`fig,
I C .
V3
c
i
/ 2.8
r 3
h
rCD
yQ
1004
0 sampling Site
¢
CO
Goose Creek Time -of -Travel Study 1997
WWTP
Mecklenburg and Union County, North Carolina
1
0 1 2 MilesL
PP

'r-
Sampling Site Descriptions
Station 1. Stevens Creek at SR 3125 (Thompson Road) near Hoods Crossroads
Stevens Creek at this location is near its headwaters and is a clear fast running brook with a
course sand and rock substrate. The headwaters contain 13 to 15 small farm ponds once
rural farm land but now contain numerous subdivisions. The stream width is 8.7 ft with an
average depth of 0.4 ft. and red clay banks 6 ft. high with a tree canopy overhead of about
95%. The road crossing is two culverts about 5 ft. high.
Station 1.5 Stevens Creek at confluence with Goose Creek
This site is located northeast from the 4th hole of the Shannamara Golf Course. Stevens
Creek at this location is a clear pool / riffle stream with a rocky substrate. The stream width
is 16.8 ft. with an average depth of 0.3 ft. and steep stream banks 8 ft. high.
Station 2. Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Road)
Goose Creek at this location is a clear water pool / riffle stream with a rock and sand bottom.
The stream is 6 ft. wide with an average depth of 0.5 ft. and steep 6-7 ft. high red clay banks
with a canopy of about 100%. The road crossing is a narrow concrete bridge.
Station 2.5 Goose Creek at confluence with Stevens Creek
This location on Goose Creek at its confluence with Stevens Creek is also northeast from the
4th hole of the Shannamara Golf Course. The stream width is 11.8 ft. with an average depth
of 0.4 ft. and steep banks. The stream is a pool / riffle system with clear water and a
substrate of rocks, gravel, and sand. There was evidence of fairly new erosion along the
golf course
Station 2.8 Effluent from the Union County Public Works Hunley Creek WWTP at SR
1524 (Stevens Mill Road) This facility was formerly Fairview Dev�eloperswgunly.,�reekSubdivision. The wastewater treatment plant is a 6-0'=}5 mgf. �ackag%e plant nsisting f a
wet well, flow metering, flow equalization, an aeration / settling basin with decant, aerated
sludge digester, chlorine contact chamber, and post aeration. The Effluent limits are BODS
11 mg/l, TSS 30 mg/l, NH3 1.6 mg/l (Summer), 5.3 mg/1 (Winter), and Fecal Coliform of
200 mg/l . This wastewater treatment plant is located at the rear of the Hunley Creek
Subdivision.
Station 3. Goose Creek at SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road)
Goose Creek at this site is a clear fast runninc, stream with a rocky substrate and good slope.
The stream is 10 to 15 ft wide with an average depth of 0.5 to 1 ft. and steep wooded 3 to 4
ft. high banks. The road crossing at this site is a concrete bridge. The above mentioned
WWTP is located 250 ft. upstream of this bridge. This site was not used as a station because
it is too close to the outfall from the Hunley Creek WWTP.
Station 4. Goose Creek at SR 1525 (Mill Grove Church Road)
Goose Creek at this site is a clear pool / riffle stream with good slope and a sand and rock
bottom. The stream width is 11.4 ft. with an average depth of 0.73 ft. and steep 6 ft. high
banks with a canopy of about 80%. The road crossing is a wooden bridge.
Station 5. Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Road) near the Mint Hill - Matthew's Airport
Goose Creek at the bridge is slowed or backed up, and there is a bridge pool, with a log jam
on the upstream side of the road and a log jam downstream. Downstream of the bridge, the
stream meanders through sandbars. The stream width is 14.5 ft. with an average depth of
0.7 ft. over a sandy mud bottom. The banks are steep sand clay, 6 ft. high, with a tree
canopy of about 80%. The road crossing is a big culvert.
I 2

Station 6. Goose Creek at SR 1533 (West Duncan Road)
Goose Creek at this location runs through the Charlotte National Golf Course, which uses
the stream for irrigation. There is a 2 ft. high boom dam upstream of SR 1533, where water
is pumped from the stream to a pond which is used as source water for the irrigation system
on the golf course. The pumping rate from the stream, estimated by the superintendent, is
7,200 gpd. with the pumping time being from 0700 to 1600. The stream width is 28 ft. with
an average depth of 0.8 ft. and steep 6 ft. high banks with a canopy of about 70%
downstream and open areas upstream on the golf course. The road crossing is a concrete
bridge.
Station 7. Goose Creek at NC Hwy. 218 near Fairview
Goose Creek at this site is a muddy, barely moving stream, with a deadfall and log jam
upstream .and' a bridge pool at the bridge. The stream width is 35.6 ft. with an average depth
of 1.2 ft over a muddy sand bottom and steep 4-6 ft. high banks. The bridge crossing is a
concrete bridge in a curve.
Station 8. Goose Creek at US Hwy 601 near Fairview
Goose Creek.-t this site is a clear pool / riffle stream with a rocky substrate. The stream
width is 22.5.ft. with an average depth of 0.34 ft. The banks are sloping off a grass field on
the left bank and are a steep 4 ft. high on the right bank. The road crossing is three culverts
with water in two of the culverts and the third blocked by sand.
Station 9. Duck Creek at SR 1600 (Hopewell Church Road)
Duck Creek at this site is a muddy stream with no flow. The stream width is 40 ft. with a
depth of 1-1.5 ft. and banks 4-5 ft. high. The road crossing is a wooden bridge.
Station 10. Goose Creek at SR 1547 (Brief Road)
Goose Creek at this location is a shallow slightly muddy, pool / riffle, rocky stream, with
sandbars. The stream width is 27.7 ft. with an average depth 0.69 ft. and steep banks 4-6 ft.
high. The creek in this area has a wide stream bed with the stream meandering through sand
bars. The road crossing is a wooden bridge.
Parametric Coverage
Physical and chemical parameters requested by the Modeling Unit were selected to:
• Determine the significance of upstream, major tributary and effluent BOD loads.
• Determine the significance of run-off flow.
• Estimate velocity, width and depth of stream sections.
• Determine the relationship between BOD contributions and instream water quality
through the application of a QUAL2E model.
• Incorporate model results into the Yadkin River basinwide model to provide adequate
wasteload allocations for the entire basin.
Parameters Sampled
Time -of -travel dve study - tracer study done with a red fluorescent dye, Rhodamine
WT (20% solution) injected into the stream and sampled for peak dye concentrations.
Stream discharge - cross -sections and instantaneous flow measurements.
Field parameters - Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Temperature (Temp.), Specific
Conductance @25°C (Sp. Cond.), and pH.
3

Chemical parameters - Ammonia (NH3), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), Nitrites +
Nitrates (NO2+NO3), and Total Phosphorus (P).
Oxygen demanding substances - 5 day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) and
long term Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODLT)•
Collection Methods
Physical and chemical parameters were collected by accepted water data acquisition
methods, N.C. Dept. DENR, Standard Operating Procedures Manual, Physical and
Chemical Monitoring, February, 1996 The physical parameters, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, specific conductance, pH, and flow measurements were measured in -situ. Dye
samples were either hand sampled or collected by Isco automatic sampler. Chemical samples
were collected as grab samples.
Field Instruments
Field measurements were taken with Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) Dissolved
Oxygen / Conductivy meters model 85, Dissolved oxygen meters model 55, and YSI
Conductivity meters model 30. The pH meters used were Hanna model H1931. The flow
meters were Scientific Instruments model 1205 mini meters. The automatic samplers were
Isco model 2700 and model 3700. The fluorometers were Turner Designs model 10-005 R
and model 10-AU. All meters were checked for calibration prior to sampling.
Flow Measurements
Flow measurements were done by wading in the stream and measuring the cross
sectional area with a tape and flow rod, and the instantaneous velocity with a vertical axis
current meter (pygmy meter).
Chemical Analysis
All chemical analyses were performed in the Division of Water Quality Central
Laboratory in Raleigh. Samples were hand delivered to the Lab by the sampling crews.
Dye Analysis
All dye samples were analyzed in the field with battery powered Turner fluorometers,
which were checked for calibration prior to running the samples.
Discussion of Data
Mid Flow Study August 5-7, 1997 Flow in Goose Creek - 6.47 cfs. at US Hwy. 601
(See Table 1)
The first study on Goose Creek, the mid flow study (6.47 cfs. at US Hwy. 601) was
conducted from August 5 thru August 7, 1997. For the time -of -travel dye study, the total
study reach was divided into four smaller sub -reaches, with dye dosed into each sub -reach.
The sub -reaches were as follows:
51

15t. sub -reach - Station 1 Stevens Creek at SR 3125 (Thompson Rd.) to Station 5 Goose
Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.), a distance of 5.7 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach
was 50 hrs. 30 min. at an average velocity of 0.18 fps. The flow regimen in the reach was
0.88 cfs at the beginning of the reach and 2.51 cfs at the end of the reach.
2nd. sub -reach - Station 5 Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.) to Station 6 Goose Creek
at SR 1533 (West Duncan Rd.), a distance of 0.9 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach
was 7 hrs. 30 min. at an average velocity of 0.18 fps. The flow regimen in the reach was
2.97 cfs. at the beginning of the reach and 3.17 cfs. at the end of the reach.
3rd. sub -reach - Station 6 Goose Creek at SR 1533 (West Duncan Rd.) to Station 7 NC
Hwy. 218, a distance of 2.3 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach was 25 hrs. 45 min. at
an average velocity of 0.13 fps. The flow regimen in the reach was 3.75 cfs at the beginning
of the reach and 4.93 cfs at the end of the reach.
4th. sub -reach - Station 7 Goose Creek at NC Hwy. 218 to Station 10 Goose Creek at SR
1547 (Brief Rd.), a distance of 2.0 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach was 19 hrs. 30
min. at an average velocity of 0.14 fps. The flow regimen in the reach was 4.93 cfs at the
beginning of the reach and 7.06 cfs. at the end of the reach.
Physical / Chemical Data
The physical and chemical data collected during this mid flow study are presented in Table 2
and are discussed below.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) - Instream DO values during the study averaged 7.6 mg/l (86%
saturation) and ranged from a low of 6.3 mg/1 at Goose Creek at NC Hwy 218 to a high of
9.0 mg/1 at SR 1525. Attached algae (not sampled) increased the DO levels in the stream
during the day. A low DO value of 34°=ntg/1'was noted in the effluent of the ley
,-W.,TP-.upstream of SR 1524. A low DO value oft5 3I:EJ1'a_lso_was noted -at Duck Creek.
Temperature - Instream temperature values averaged 21.9 °C and ranged from 19.4 to 23.7°C
depending on the time of day.
Specific Conductivity - Instream conductivity values averaged 118 µmhos and ranged from
85 to 134 µmhos with a general increase from upstream to downstream. The effluent from
the Hunley Creek WVVTP.was-47-4 µmhos.
pH - Instream pH values averaged 7.3 and ranged from 6.9 to 7.8 depending on the time of
day and amount of attached algae in the stream.
Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3) -- Instream Ammonia values averaged 0:01 m&
C-reI and ranged from
<0.01 to 0.03 mg/l. The Hunley ek WWTP_had_an ammonia value of-0.05 m-Jl.
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) - Instream TKN values averaged0.23 m,,A and ranged from
0.1 to 0.4 mg/I. The Hunley Creek-WW-TP had a TKN_value_of_ 1-.0-m.Jl.
Nitrite & Nitrate Nitrogen (NO2+NO3)j Instream NOx values averaged 1.0 mg/l and
ranged from 0.21 to 1.6 mg/l. The Hunle--y-Creek WWTP-had-a-NOX valde-W14mg/l.
Total Phosphorus (Tot. P) - The instream phosphorus values averaged 0.16 mg/l and ranged
from 0.02 to 0.28 mg/l. The Hunley`C'reek-!W-WTP-�had--T_ot._P value-of-4-4 mg/l.
5

Table 1
MID FLOW STUDY
STEVENS CREEK / GOOSE CREEK TIME -OF -TRAVEL 08/05/97
auo-rieacn r
Station
Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mile
Time of Travel
Cumulative
Peak/Dose Date & Time
Discharge
Velocity
miles
from station 01
hours minutes
Time of Travel
cis
It/sec
01
Stevens Creek at SR3125 (dose 500 ml)
0.00
0.00
Dose 8/5/97 1030
0.88
02.5
Stevens Cr..20' ups from confluence with Goose Cr.
1.40
1.40
10hrs. Omin.
10hrs Omin.
Peak 8/5/97 2130
1.95
0.21
04
Goose Cr. at SR1525
3.00
4.40
31hrs. Omin.
41hrs. Omin.
Peak 8/7/97 0430
3.30
0.14
05
Goose Cr. at SR1004
1.30
5.70
9hrs. 30 min
50hrs. 30min.
Peak 8/7/97 1400
2.51
0.20
Sub -Reach 2
Station
Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mlle Time of Travel
Peak/Dose Date & Time Discharge Velocity
miles
from station Oi hours minutes
cis It/sec
05
Goose Cr. at SR1004 (dose 250 ml)
0.00
5.70
Dose 8/6/97 1130 2.97
06
Goose Cr. at SR1533
0.90
6.60 7 hrs. 30 min. 58hrs.
Peak 8/6/97 1900 3.17 0.18
Sub -Reach 3
Station Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mlle Time of Travel Peak/Dose Date & Time
Discharge Velocity
miles
from station 01 hours minutes
cis It/sec
06 Goose Cr. at SR1533 (dose 300 ml)
0.00
6.60 Dose 8/6/D7 1115
3.75
07 Goose Cr. at Rt. 218
2.30
8.90 25hrs. 45min. 83hrs. 45min. Peak 8/7/97 1300
4.32 0.13
auo-neacn 4
Station
Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mile
Time of Travel
Peak/Dose Date & Time
Discharge
Velocity
miles
from station of
hours minutes
cis
It/sec
07
Goose Cr. at 218 (250 ml)
0.00
8.90
Dose 8/5/97 1400
4.93
08
Goose Cr. at Rt. 601
1.10
10.00
12 hrs. Omin.
95hrs. 45min. Peak 8/6/97 0200
6.47
0.13
10
Goose Cr. at SR1547
2.00
12.00
19hrs. 30min.
115hrs. 15min. Peak 8/6/97 2130
7.06
0.15

r
Table 2
Mid Flow Study
Stevens Creek / Goose Creek Physical / Chemical Data
Station
Location
Date
Time
D.O.
Temp
Spc. Cond
pH
NH3
- TKN
NO2 + NO3
P total
(mg/L)
(°C)
(limhos)
(su)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
1
Stevens Creek at SR3125 (Thompson Rd.)
8/5/97
1 030
7.2
22.7
90
7.8
<0.01
0.2
0.21
0.02
1.5
Stevens Creek at confluence with Goose Cr.
8/5/97
1 220
8.0
21 .8
102
7.6
(borders Shannamara Golf Course)
8/5/97
1715
7.6
22.7
103
7.3
<0.01
0.2
0.80
0.14
8/6/97
0930
8.7
19.7
104
7.3
2
Goose Creek off SR1004 (Lawyers Rd.)
8/5/97
1130
7.1
20.4
85
7.8
<0.01
0.2
0.79
0.04
2.5
Goose Creek at confluence with Stevens Cr.
8/5/97
1230
7.9
21.3
1 1 0
7.7
0.01
0.1
1.10
0.03
(borders Shannamara Golf Course)
8/5/97
171.5
7.5
22.7
102
7.2
"
8/6/97
0030
8.0
19.4
100
7.3
2.8
Effluent - Union Co. WWTP
8/7/97
0930
3.4
25.7
474
6.7
0.05
1.0
14.00
4.40
3 _ ._ .
Goose Creek at SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Rd.)
-
-
-
.
4
Goose Creek at SR1525 (Mill Grove Church Rd.)
8/5/97
1610
8.1
22.3
124
7.2
"
8/6/97
10.30
9.0
21.1
126
7.1
"
8/7/97
0900
-
-
-
<0.01
0.1
1.20
0.28
5
Goose Creek at SR1004 (Lawyers Rd.)
8/5/97
1640
6.6
23.6
123
7.7
"
8/6/97
1130
7.2
21.2
114
7.1
"
817/97
1200
-
-
0.02
0.3
1.20
0.26
6
Goose Creek at SR1533 (West Duncan Rd.)
8/6/97
1 ? 25
8.4
22.1
123
7.2
<0.01
0.2
1.10
0.21
(borders Charlotte National Golf Course)
8/6/97
1715
6.9
23.2
1 1 3
7.8
<0.01
0.4
0.91
0.24
7
Goose Cr. at NC Hwy. 218
8/5/97
1430
7.4
23.0
133
7.2
0.02
0.2
1.60
0.22
"
8/6/97
1345
6.4
21.7
115
7.0
"
8/7/97
1030
6.3
20.7
125
7.1
"
8/7/97
1310
6.8
21.5
124
7.0
0.01
0.3
0.86
0.17
a
Goose Cr. at US Hwy. 601
8/5/97
1 620
8.1
23.2
130
7.2
<0.01
0.3
1.20
0.15
"
815/97
1730
7.6
23.1
130
-
"
8/6/97
0910
7.0
21.2
134
6.9
9
Duck Cr. at SR1600 (Hopewell Church Rd.)
816/97
1 050
5.3
20.4
125
7.2
0.02
0.3
0.95
0.07
10
Goose Cr. at SR1547 (Brief Rd.)
8/5/97
1710
8.2
23.7
132
7.4
"
8/6/97
0950
7.7
20.6
134
7.3
"
016/97
1545
8.5
23.1
133
7.3
0.03.
0.2
1.20
0.12
"
8/7/97
0910
7.4
20.3
133
7.1

Low Flow Study August 26-29, 1997 Flow in Goose Creek - 0.96 cfs at US Hwy. 601
(See Table 3)
The second study on Goose Creek, the low flow study (0.96 cfs at US Hwy. 601)
was conducted from August 26 thru August 29, 1997. For the time -of -travel dye study, the
total study reach was divided into six smaller sub -reaches, with dye dosed into each sub -
reach. The sub -reaches were different than the mid flow study and as follows:
1st. sub -reach - Station 1 Stevens Creek at SR 3125 (Thompson Rd.) to Station 1.5 Stevens
Creek upstream from its confluence with Goose Creek, a distance of 1.4 miles. The travel
time for the sub -reach was 30 hrs. 45 min. at an average velocity of 0.07 fps. The flow
regimen was 0.18 cfs. at the beginning of the reach and approximately 0.57 cfs. at the end of
the reach.
2nd. sub -reach - Station 1.5 Stevens Creek upstream from its confluence with Goose Creek
to Station 5 Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.), a distance of 4.3 miles. The travel time
for the sub -reach was 72 hrs. 15 min. at an average velocity of 0.09 fps. The flow regimen
was 0.57 "cfs. at the beginning of the reach and approximately 1.47 cfs at the end of the
reach.
3rd. sub -reach - Station 5 Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.) to Station 6 Goose Creek
at SR 1533 (West Duncan Rd.), a distance of 0.9 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach
was 13 hrs. 45 min. at an velocity of 0.10 fps. The flow regimen was 1.25 cfs. at the
beginning of the reach and 1.00 cfs at the end of the reach.
4th. Sub -reach - Station 6 Goose Creek at SR 1533 (West Duncan Rd.) to Goose Creek at
NC Hwy. 218 a distance of 2.3 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach was 63 hrs. 30 min.
at an average velocity of 0.05 fps. The flow regimen was 0.83 cfs at the beginning of the
reach and no flow measurement was done at the end of the reach on this dye study.
5th. Sub -reach - Station 7 Goose Creek at NC Hwy. 218 to Station 8 Goose Creek at US
Hwy. 601, a distance of 1.1 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach was 43 hrs. at an
average velocity of 0.04 fps. The flow regimen was 1.65 cfs at the beginning of the reach
and 0.96 cfs at the end of the reach.
6th. Sub -reach - Station 8 Goose Creek at US Hwy. 601 to Station 10 Goose at SR 1547
(Brief Rd.), a distance of 2.0 miles. The travel time for the sub -reach was 55 hrs. at an
average velocity of 0.05 fps. The flow regimen was 1.43 cfs. at the beginning of the reach
and 0.83 cfs at the end of the reach.
Physical / Chemical Data
The physical and chemical data collected during this low flow study are presented in Table 4
and discussed below.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) - Instream DO values during the study averaged 7.8 mg/1(85%
saturation) -and -ranged from --a low of 5.9 mg/1 to a high of 12.2 mg/l. A low DO-valueio, �7-7
mgf l-was-noted-at Duck Creek.
Temperature - Instream temperature values averaged 20.4°C and ranged from 19.1 to 23.4C.
Specific Conductivity - Instream Conductivity values averaged 149 µmhos and ranged from
100 to 186 µmhos.
R

pH - Instream pH values averaged 7.4 and ranged from 6.7 to 8.3.
Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3) - Instream Ammonia values averaged 0.013 mg/l and ranged from
<0.01 to 0.03 mg/l. The effluent from the Hunley Creek WWTP had an ammonia value of
0.08 mg/l.
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) - Instream TKN values averaged 0.2 mg/1 and ranged fro
0.1 to 0.3 mg/l. The Hunley Creek WWTP had a TKN value of 1.1 mg/1.
Nitrite & Nitrate Nitrogen (NO2+NO3) - Instream NOx values averaged 1.16 mg/1 and
ranged from 0.31 to 2.4 mg/l. The Hunley Creek WWTP had a TKN value of 9.2 mg/l.
Total Phosphorus- (Tot.P) - Instream phosphorus values averaged 0.24 mg/l and ranged from
0.02 to 0.60 mg/1. The Hunley Creek WWTP had a Tot. P value of 5.1 mg/l.
5 Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) - Instream BOD5 values averaged 1.12 mg/l
and ranged from 0.92 to 1.54 mg/l. The Hunley Creek WWTP had a BOD5 value of 4.09
mg/l.
30 Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD30) - The instream BOD30 values averaged 3.17
mg/1 and ranged from 2.67 to 4.10 mg/1. The Hunley Creek WWTP had a BOD30 value of
10.45 mg/l. y
Individual flow measurement calculations with cross sectional area information are presented
for the readers use in the appendix.
7

Table 3
LOW FLOW STUDY
STEVENS CREEK / GOOSE CREEK TIME -OF -TRAVEL 08/26/97
Sub -Reach 1
Station Location Distance Between Sites Stream Mile Time of Travel Cumulative Peak/Dose Dale & Time Discharge Velocity
miles from station 01 hours minutes Time of Travel cis It/sec
01 Stevens Creek at SR3125 (dose 500 ml) 0.00 0.00 Dose 8/26/97 1115 0.18
1.5 Stevens Cr.,20' ups from confluence with Goose Cr. 1.40 1.40 30 hrs. 45min. 30 hrs. 45min. Poak 8/27/97 1800 0.07
auo-rieacn
Station
Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mlle
Time of Travel
Peak/Dose Date 8 Time
Discharge
Velocity
miles
from station of
hours minutes
cis
ft/sec
1.5
Stevens Cr.,20' ups from confluence with Goose Cr.
0.00
1.40
Dose 8/26/97 1245
0.74
04
Goose Cr. at SR1525
3.00
4.40
50hrs. 15min.
81hrs. 00min. Peak 8/28/97 1500
1.47
0.09
05
Goose Cr. at SR1004
1.30
5.70
22hrs 00min
103hrs 00min Peak 8129/97 1300
0.09
ach 3
Station Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Mlle Time of Travel t Peak/Dose Date 8 Time
Discharge Velocity
miles
from station 01 hours minutes
cis ft/sec
05 Goose Cr. at SR1004 (dose 250 ml)
0.00
. 5.70 - . • Dose 8/26/97 _1215
1.25
06 Goose Cr. at SR1533
r 0.90
6.60 13hrs. 45m1n. 116hrs 45min. Peak 8127197 0200
1.00 0.10
Sub -Reach 4
Station Location Distance Between Sites Stream Mile Time of Travel Peak/Dose Date 8 Time Discharge Velocity
miles from station 01 hours minutes cfs ft/sec
06 Goose Cr. at SR1533 (dose 300 ml) 0.00 6.60 Dose 8/26/97 1130 0.83
07 Goose Cr. at Rt. 218 2.30 8.90 63hrs. 30min, 180hrs. 15min. Peak 8/29/97 0300 0.05
Sub -Reach 5
Station Location
Distance Between Sites
Stream Milo Timo of Travel Peak/Doso Date 8 Time
Discharge Velocity
miles
from station 01 hours minutes
cfs It/sec
07 Goose Cr. at 218 (250 ml)
0.00
8.90 Dose 8/26/97 1100
1.65
08 Goose Cr. at Rt. 601
1.10
10.00 43hrs. 00min. 223hrs. 15min. Peak 8/28/97 0600
0.86 0.04
Sub -Reach 6
Station Location Distance Between Sites Stream Mile Time of Travel Peak/Dose Date 8 Time Discharge Velocity
miles from station 01 hours minutes cfs It/sec
08 Goose Cr. at Rt. 601 1.10 10.00 Peak 8/26/97 1500 1.43
10 Goose Cr. at SR1547 2.00 12.00 55hrs. 00min. 278hrs. 15min. Peak 8128/97 2200 0.83 0.05

Table 4 Low Flow Study
Stevens Creek / Goose Creek Physical / Chemical Data
Station
Location
Dale
Time
D.O.
Temp
Spc. Cond
pH
NH3
TKN
NO2 + NO3
P total
BOD5
BOD30
(mg/L)
(°C)
(µmhos)
(su)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
1
Stevens Creek at SR 3125 (Thompson Rd.)
8/26/97
1420
7.5
19.3
107
6.7
"
8/28/97
0930
6.8
20.3
110
7.2
<0.01
0.2
0.39
0.02
1.02
2.67
1.5
Stevens Creek at confluence with Goose Creek
8/26/97
1245
9.2
19.7
125
7.8
(borders Shannamara Golf Course)
8/27/97
0930
8.1
19.1
131
7.5
"
8/28/97
0845
7.9
19.4
133
7.3
<0.01
0.2
2.40
0.32
2
Goose Creek off SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.)
8/26/97
1400
8.7
19.6
100
7.1
"
8/28/97
0915
7.0
19.6
113
6.8
0.03
0.1
1.10
0.05
1.54
4.10
2.5
Goose Creek at confluence with Stevens Creek
8/26/97
1245
8.5
19.3
103
7.6
(borders Shannamara Golf Course)
8/27/97
0930
8.4
19.2
106
7.4
8/28/97
0815
8.1
19.6
109
7.2
<0.01
0.1
1.20
0.05
2.8
Effluent - Union Co. WWTP
8/28/97
0900
-
-
0.08
1.1
9.20
5.10
4.09
10.45
3
Goose Creek at SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Rd.)
-
-
-
4
Goose Creek at SR1525 (Mill Grove Church Rd.)
8/28/97
1030
7.9
21.1
171
7.0
I 0.01
0.2
2.00
0.60
1.15
3.15
5
Goose Creek at SR 1004 (Lawyers Rd.)
8/26/97
1115
7.7
19.9
151
7.5
"
8/28/97
18/26/97
1345
7.2
22.1
186
7.3
0.02
0.3
1.70
0.49
0.92
2.71
6
Goose Creek at SRI533 (West Duncan Rd.)
1140
9.8
20.7
172
7.5
0.01
0.1
1.40
0.36
(borders Charlotte National Golf Course)
8/26/97
1430
12.2
23.4
173
8.3
8/27/97
0915
7.8
20.0
159
7.2
"
8/27/97
1015
7.3
21.3
176
7
Goose Creek at N.C. Hwy. 218
8/26/97
1115
6.5
19.1
168
7.1
0.01
0.2
0.85
0.21
"
8/27/97
1000
5.9
20.2
170
-
8/27/97
1535
6.3
21.1
168
-
"
8/28/97
1245
5.9
22.1
168
7.4
0.01
0.2
0.81
0.22
8
Goose Creek at US Hwy. 601
8/26/97
1500
8.5
21.6
170
7.4
8/27/97
0925
6.6
19.6
168
7.4
"
8127/97
1545
8.4
22.2
166
7.4
"
8/28/97
0900
6.5
20.0
167
7.5
0.02
0.3
0.58
0.16
0.96
3.03
9
Duck Creek at SR1600 (Hopewell Church Rd.)
8/27/97
1335
3.7
19.6
138
10
Goose Creek at SR 1547 (Brief Rd.)
8/26/97
1 600
9.8
22.7
160
7.8
"
8/27/97
0845
7.1
19.4
165
7.3
"
8128/97
1000
7.7
20.5
167
7.G
0.02
0.3
0.31
0.10
1.13
3.35

Appendix

r
y
0
--j
?
W
�
NOo0O\
�
A
.
Appe wp
'
D0
00000�00000
o
,� p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
CD
CD
CAD
Oo
-'
CCD
00000000000
C
tAI✓
U
N
W
P
lA
:P
W
W
N
W
N
f-
¢�
to
C)
OOOOOOOOOIJO
001—CD
O
CD
CCDn
'
CAD CCDD
CD CD
LA
►--NNNN��N�--
O
p
�
OON
LA
-.3
�O1,Ooo
cn
G
On
CD
CD
C]
CD
0
0
0
0
0�--
0
0
"I
Col
0
0
En
O
CD
CD
�o00CDb CD
O O O O O O O O O O O
CDCD
pi
00000000000
On
y
�p o.
OIQ
C�CA W �(-AW ONO0000CD
�
ca. O
CD
00000000000
O
K
W :A. " :P :P CN :A ON
a
trCD P
0o0000cAO00 cn
dc
x.
OOOo0000000
N
E4
0 Ao.
OON NN NN W tvO(q
0
{��D Aoo
Oo0Nrn PcnrnC)CD W
nip
1�tnNO
'11 () -r1
OD CCql CDRD
cnC�
CD p
n �
w
CD
CL
IOICD LA OIOIOIOIO
OOOo0oo00000000
P 'vn in 'v :k :P LA LA O\ 'v, 'v, :P :.P :P t N
O O O O 00 O O CC) O o O t J W CDO
-Ph.Oo 0� iP N a, IdN N N �O 0 0o W
r
o�
0
w
7r
•�
w
N � 2
o'
F
C/)
C
0ol'-,
w
CD
C►-
Ut`
I,)
y
w
o
LA
CAD
CCD CD
CD CD r--
'-' ' t O
W
O
Cn
F�
ICIwIwIwINICI�IwIC=>CD
NI
I
ICICDcn
I
I
0 0 0 PIP 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C)
Vi O\ (-A In In LA Vi LA (A LA LA LA .tA LA LA i!,
C n
Vi00000000000000 Vi
G
OOo000o0000.000000y
CCD
CDw
CD
CDa. a
N" W W.W N W W W N N r O O
ram',
CD
t� y o
d0
Oro W ONWOW 00000CDw00wO�C
-el
CD n
O � �., ..
�
000000000C) 000000
0 CD
�e
S. q p,
tJ V.) IJ IJ IJ lJ Iv W iN iJ IJ IJ N N
C
" (M CD
C
IQ O (-It (-It -P (.A LA 0 k.0 In �-- IQ O " 0 0',En
d�
co
n
OOOOo00000000000
OOWoo
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOpq
CD
p'
tJ 00rn�
IQONC\C\OOOO0000�PN DO ON
CD
N00oo
CD C'D (-D ^
C/D �
.Gl
CD C
CL

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 2
Location: SR 1004
Date: 8/5/97 1130
Bank 1: 1 Feet
Bank 2: 7 Feet
Enter values:
istance I Depth I Revolutnsl Seco
2.50
0.30
0
40
3.00
0.40
6
40
_
3.50
0.48
8
40
4.00
0.52
14
40
4.50
0.58
18
40
5.00
0.72
12
40
5.50
0.64
12
43
6.00
0.60
16
40
6.50
0.60
6
40
7.00
Total Width:
6.00 feet
Total Area:
2.50 Feet Squared
Calculated Discharge:
0.66 CFS
Calculated
Velocity:
0.27 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d
vel x area
Nidth
IVelocityl
Area I
Discharge
0.75
0.00 0.08
0.00
0.50
0.00 0.15
0.00
0.50
0.15 0.20
0.03
0.50
0.20 0.24
0.05
0.10
0.35 0.26
0.09
0.50
0.45 0.29
0.13
0.50
0.30 0.30'
0.11
0.50
0.28 0.32
0.09
0.50
0.40 0.30
0.12
0.50
0.15 0.30
0.05
Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 2.5
Total Width:
11.80 feet
Location:
100ft ups from confluence/Stevens
Total Area:
4.60 Feet Squared
Date:
8/5/97 1205
Calculated Discharge:
1.13 CFS
Bank 1:
1.5 Feet
Calculated Velocity:
0.25 Feet/sec
Bank 2:
13.3 Feet
Enter values:
Distance I Death IRevolutnsl Seconds Wi
5.00
0.30
7
40
6.00
0.50
7
40
8.00
0.50
11
42
10.00
0.70
12
40
12.00
0.50
12
41
13.30
i
i
rev/sec w x d vel x area
'elocityl Area Discharaf
1.50
0.18
0.45 -
0.08
1.50
0.18
0.75
0.13
2.00
0.26
1.00
0.26
2.00 _
0.30
1.40
0.42
1.65
0.29
0.83
0.24

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 4
Location: SR 1525
Date: 8/6/97 1030
Bank 1: 0.8 Feet
Bank 2: 12.2 Feet
Total Width:
Total Area:
Calculated Discharge:
Calculated Velocity:
11.40 feet
7.82 Feet Squared
3.30 CFS
0.42 Feet/sec
Enter values:
rev/sec
w x d
vel x area
Distance
I Depth
IRcvolutnsl
Seconds
I Width
Ivelocityl
Area
Discharge
1.50
1.00
2
40
0.60
0.05
0.60
0.03
2.00
0.80
10
40
0.50
0.25
0.40
0.10
2.50
0.70
13
40
0.50
0.33
0.35
0.11
3.00
0.70
20
40
0.50
0.50
0.35
0.18
3.50
0.90
28
40
0.50
0.70
0.45
0.32
4.00
0.90
30
41
0.50
0.73
0.45
0.33
4.50
1.00
42
40
0.50
1.05
0.50
0.53
5.00
1.00
32
40
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.40
5.50
1.00
28
40
0.50
0.70
0.50
0.35
6.00
0.90
26
42
0.50
0.62
0.45
0.28
I 6.50
0.90
18
42
0.50
0.43
0.45
0.19
7.00
- =0.85
0
40
0.50
0.00
0.43
0.00
7.50
0.80
0
40
0.50
0.00
0.40
0.00
8.00
0.70
2
40
_ 0.50
0.05
0. 3'5
0.02
8.50
0.70
4
40
0.50
0.10
0.35
0.04
9.00
0.70
8
41
0.50
0.20
0.35
0.07
9.50
0.50
24
40
0.50
0.60
0.25
0.15
10.00
0.40
26
40
0.50
0.65
0.20
0.13
10.50
0.50
14
40
0.50.
0.35
0.25
0.09
11.00
0.25
0
40
0.50
0.00
0.13
0.00
11.50
0.20
0
40
0.60
0.00
0.12
0.00
12.20
i

d
r
o cfn
(n!�
W
N
OO\7\JOOOO-1
N
'11
oGoo(-,OV,OV,
oV,oCnOV,oCAO
V,OV,0CnOLi
�
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
G
O
G
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
d
00
CD
(D
00
f +
y
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
-P
G
O
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0�
O
CIN
•P
w
•P
V,
--1
00
\J
�10
�10
00
00
�O
m
00
lJ
�D
%lO
\0
00
--j
LA
LA
n
O0000v,
OCR,
OG
GOo--]
000
•P0OCD
000CDC)
O
��
PiO-]
CD
CD
CD
<
CD CD
CD CD -
O
G
�
N
P
01%
m
ON
m
ON
oO
(a,,
C
P
-P
U
tN
Q\
ON
P.
-P
•P
F-
O
Do
O
C/]
C/]
CD
n
00oo00tNON - PONO-PW �• 0 Wr Noo
i
C
O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�
n
� o o � (-A•v, (-A . v, v, A ' A 'v, ' A •v, ' A LA " " •v, •v, 'v, v, 'v, *"
n r_
OOO V,000 _')O GOOo00000000000CnCD
n
c O o 0 o O G CDO CD0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rD
N
� n y
W W P P P W W W W .p. N W Lo N W W W N N N G
"
Cc
n
a y O
V, O V, CDLA O W O I-) L: O\ (.n W 0 --a�l ON -,1 V, W --.a •p• o o
O i
X
J
a
O O o 0 0 0 G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G O G CD 0 0 0"
p c;
O-wNNNN(.J-P�4�!, -P-P•P•P•Pif,r���'--A•AWNN
C
�1 00 O W W '-A W (l, O Cn CJ, Cl, 4�, -P�, Cl, N A Cl, m V CJ, O Cl, 00 00
b<
0
O O O O O O G G O 0 0 0 0 0 O O G O G o G o 0 o C
O N 00 Al
'v,
O O �-. O -- — -- -- �--• �-- �--. �--• �--. �--�--. �--. .--. �--. •-. � O O O
tra
co
w \J �O
Cll \J G C O P DO C;N O
CD
W --1 W O
�
fin-
0 CD
CDcc"^
CD
CD
a

V
d
r
td td o C/)
P.
W
W
N
N
OC�J�o00oO
�-1O\O\CnN
A
A
W
W
NN�-
-
x
Cn
O
to
O
Cn
O
Cn
O
Vi
O
lrn
O
(-n
O
In
O
V1
0
VI
O
V1
0
V1
0
V1
0
LA
CD
O
C
o
C
O
C
O
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
O
0
C
C
C
0
0
0
0
0
N~
b
O
CD
CD
pp
'-
cn
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
CD
6
C�
O
CD
CD
C
C:)
c)
F
�l
C
�
0
IQ
Ili
.A
ON
CN
V
�O
110
OO
O0
00
00
--]
ON
-1
-j
1
ON
(n
.P
W
N
n
00
DO
W
COON
W
CF--o000NO0O
ONC
.A.Oocn00
cD
CD
x
CD
<
CCi:,
• •
O CD
'D (D �-
O
r--
F
F -
. +
F�
• -
�-
N
IN
F-
F-
F-
IJ
F-
�
O
OO4�,
POUF-
W
D\Cn
D\rnut�]OF
ONCn00J00ON00000N
cn
C/)
CD
O
Ut
--P
CD CD CD CDC O 0 CD0 G C O 0 CD0 0 CD0 0 CD0 0 0 0 0 C
cn
I
C1.
o.000.0000000000000000000000
C�
(-A (.A v, (-A 'V, in cn Cn in v, '-A 'V, cn (-n cn to in to cn Ln 'v, in Cn cn cn iA
i7
C C O o 0 o C C o C o o C C C C 0 0 0 0 o C C O C C
CD
0000000000.0000000000000000�y
tea.
oCNNNW �W 4�:, .AW A( -A Ln-P�6W-P.P4�,.-P-PCA-PW
C o o C cn o0 0o w o 00 C o 0o w O w O m cn w v, C cn o v, 0
T
CL - O
cD c, �.
�p>
00oo0ooCOoOOCCC000O0000000�
N W W .1, p .P -Pl. !A �� W W W W W W N N 0 0 0 0
c.
- W r
`< CD >J
P P NO C V��JO�-OO�O�-tn�JUCD0,CD N�,.om cn
d�
C
CD
n
X
O C O C O O O O O O C C O O O O O O O C C O O O O C
O N W
COCOO --- --� --- -- - -N OOCD OD 'D
j
�D
Wcn�cn
C CD IQ W 00 N W (n 0% l.n 0, ON C.n W o0 O -P N 10 `1 In 4. .A. N N
CD
Cn J O
n
0 (D
CD p
n r
G

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 6
Location: SR 1533
Date: 8/6/97 1145
Bank 1: 1.5 Feet
Bank 2: 29.5 Feet
Enter values:
Distance I Depth IRevolutnsl Seconds
3.00 0.80 7 40
4.00
0.80
10
43
6.00
0.80
12
41
8.00
1.00
19
4.1
10.00
0.65
9
41
12.00
0.65
7
44
j 14.00
0.70
11
-- 42
16.00
1.00
6
43
18.00
1.00
4
42
20.00
1.00
7
40
22.00
1.10
5
45
24.00
1.00
0
40
26.00
0.50
0
40
28.00
0.45
0
40
29.50
Total Width:
28.00 feet
Total Area:
21.74 Feet Squared
Calculated Discharge:
3.75 CFS
Calculated Velocity:
0.17 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
Vidth
I Velocity)
Area
I Discharge
0.75
0.07
0.15
0.01
1.00
0.18
0.80
0.14
1.50
0.23
1.20
0.28
2.00
0.29
1.60
0.47
2.00
0.46
2.00
0.93
2.00
0.22
1.30
0.29
2.00
0.16
1.30
0.21
2.00
0.26
1.40
0.37
2.00
0.14
2.00
0.28
2.00
0.10
2.00
0.19
2.00
0.18
2.00
0.35
2.00
0.11
2.20
0.24
2.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
1..00
0.00
1.75
0.00
0.79
0.00

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 6
Location: SR 1533
Date: 8/6/97 1715
Bank 1: 2.1 Feet
Bank 2: 13.4 Feet
Total Width:
Total Area:
Calculated Discharge:
Calculated Velocity:
11.30 feet
4.38 Feet Squared
3.17 CFS
0.73 Feet/sec
Enter values: rev/sec w x d vel x area
Deoth I Revolutnsi Seconds I Width IVelocitvI Area Discharge
3.00
0.40
16
40
0.50:
0.40
0.20
0.08
3.50
0.38
40
40
0.50
1.00
0.19
0.19
4.00
0.40
20
40
0.5,0
0.50
0.20
0.10
4.50
0.37
38
40
0.50
0.95
0.19
0.18
5.00
0.37
28
40
0.50
0.70
0.19
0.13
5.50
0.37
40
40
0.50
1.00
0.19
0.19
6.00
0.28
38
40
0.50
0.95
0.14
0.13
6.50
0.63
38
40
0.50
0.95
0.32
0.30
7.00
0.38
34
40
0.50
0.85
0.19
0.16
7.50
_0.38
30
40
0.50
0.75
0.19
0.14
8.00'
0.46
26
40
0.50
0.65
0.23
0.15
8.50
0.42
30
40
0.50
0.75
0.21
0.16
9.00
0.48
28
40
- 0.50
0.70
0.24
0.17
9.50
0.40
34
40
0.50
0.85
0.20
0.17
10.00
0.40
34
40
0.50
0.85
0.20
0.17
10.50
0.45
34
40
0.50
0.85
0.23
0.19
11.00
0.51
30
40
0.50
0.75
0.26
0.19
11.50
0.50
32
40
0.50
0.80
0.25
0.20
12.00
0.42
24
40
0.50
0.60
0.21
0.13
12.50
0.30
14
4.0
0.50
0.35
0.15
0.05
13.00
0.20
0
40
0.45
0.00
0.09
0.00
.13.40

r
tz
r
wtd ocn
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
N)
IQ
IQ
P-3 pFS Es F'
N
O
00
ON
P
N
O
OO
P\
I�
N
O
oo
O\
A
N
C)
d ^• In
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
'-' O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N~
O
CD
0xo
-
��r-
ter-
�+��--
p
U
W
LA�
CD
C7
to
'�
to
Cn
-P
�
N
.A.
-A'
�A-
-A•
to
IQ.P
W
to
•P
00
J
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
CD
rv'
00
CD
C
chi)
CD CD
CD CD �-
O
r' 4�,
O
R
O
N
to
to
(-A
J
O\
ON
to
O\
Ll,
O\
r
O
(:D
C13
'^
V)
cD
O O O O ON W W O\ N O O O O cn O O O
i
Q-
- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�3-
n
to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 Cn
n In
to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)0 0 0 0 C)
C)
CDCD
n
oCD. oo0000o0000C:)00000y
CDa
a•dcj0 ..
000W NNto.{ptoW toNtokoWOO
2,0
'<
0 =r
O N W W Iv tN N N IN N N W N N IQ N �--
.
x
.-�
---I oo O C) 00 00 -P 00 00 00 00 C::)A 00 ON C:) o0 N
p
a
-• (To 0
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b
�
cn
000000000CD00000000
or�rna
O Nwww WQv -I,. P Pw N-PN000pq-a
CD
Oo00o00W00W ONtntn"ONW0000
CD
�W0o0
C/) n 0
�
c
CD .O
C)
a.

C7 bd bd 0 C/)
O\
PNO0oON-PNOOOON
Pt")
O1om--laN(h?W
0
-— A� t
t:��'�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
N �_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
00
0
d�
b
�xCD
cnN
CnNNNN�
NN�,O
OOOOOOOOtn
A
00000N
KNOW
W
NN.PW
000CA
(A
CD
Nt,)
O
CD
CD
C
cn
..
CD CD
CD Q
~
00
O
G
OW.P.P(.ArnONONONrn�1O\-P-PW
W
NNNNOO
CD
n
pI
P
P
P
-P
-P
-P
•P
�
4�:,
�
.A
.P
•P
-P
•P
-P
.7A
•P.-P
•P
4�1-
-P
t�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 818 8181c, 0 0 0 0 0
1
Q.
�--• N N N N N N N N N N N F--• �--�--r-�--r-� �--• �--�-'
�'
t7
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LA 0 0 0 0. O O O O O
n �'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n �
OooO0000CDC) 000000CDC)C)
on
� CD y
CDDOOOWv,v,v,v,cnOovi0000OOv�cn(.nclCDC)
C.•O
..
CD
�O•0:660 P P P PwN P PcnwwNN PwNN�D
w
a
^
C n
O O O O O O O O O CD. CD O O O N O 0 0 In Cn O O
d
�
cn
2.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C�
O O Vi
W W W W w:P1.Lo 0000000Qq
CD
�'
W UO�
CDmmC)0oNO�cn 1NOW tNOIItn W o%,DC)N �lrn00
cD
�N) NO
� c) -rj
CD (D
C4
CD
CD
CL

� N N
N O
i O O
goo
>CnO
�lgw limit
7C!]L --]
r
bd w 0 C/]
�Ft.
N~�
CDN
O
O
�--�
cn
C7
0 o
" rn(ACD
oo�
I
W
C N O %lo
O
O
�+ CIOW �l
R
CCCDD
CD CAD CCDD
CA
�--
i--•
r--
N
r-
N
N
ET
P�]ONooOkO�
NO
(ON
CT00
cn
[�
Cn
n
Q'
.P..P
.P
-P
-P.-0,
P
P
.p
4"
P...
P
P
P
.P
O
a.
O
C7, W O N -- o— o O N V i O O
c
C
NNNNNNNNNNN►-+�--�0�.�"
(7
OOOOOOOOOOotnO00o
OOOo 000000 Q00-0 Cn
0 �
00000poopoopoo0�6,3-
C)-+NN-P-P•PlnLA(A.A•W P--00
Y
(OD
\0CTCn\,O P%000WLAM1,0 WOO
Cy.O
CD
k
CD
�-
0 CD O O O
CD
c). EL
oO 00 :-1 tJ .P oN bN 0o rn 00 00 ill)0o r] -P
p
o
f CD P a.
Opo0o000o0000OW
de
x
0000OOoo0000oo0jo
�
o�]o
O�--��--�c.wornvv�m"Om pPi-OOCD
WONT]
�] W MP - mrn tJ P �O CT, --] �— O Op'
%O O\ W O
CD C7
(D
CCDD CD r?
C
En Cn
CD `p
'
n G
W
CAD
CL
td t d 0 cn
N
!�-
N
PNOooQ.
N
N
�--
i-•
r-
PNOooM
�-
I--
-P,W
Ei
0
Ppp' ppp' to
7C7C��'w
c.n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
N �,, ��
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C)
0
t7i
CD
CD
xcn
�0000opooC)CDC)
10
�
C
N
LA
n
NW
1J000
-PCn.�•A-P•A�NNN
tJ
0000000
¢�
�--�
�
Cn
Nam]CD
�O�
.1
�O
O�
WCD
Q
CO
cn
(DD C(D
CD f
N
W
W
N
W
.P
•P
W
W
W
G
p
00
00
P
•P
Or\
00
M
O
00
•P
[n
C/)
Cn
O
n
a
00
•P
•P
•P
-P
�
-P
-•P
�P
J�
�
-P
•P
Q-
..
51 CD1 51 61 61 C51 0 (51 CDI o N O
N
NOOOOOOOOOCn O
n;v.
-cn O O. Ot O O O O -O O O.- O--
Gti
n G
w.
000000 -,!- o000
0
1
y
w CD
cD a y
tJ --1 00 00 m I'O �--• O lO o0 m W
,�•
t� H O
OOCn(.nCnCnC!nOcncn00L"
...O
CD n �•
n
po.oo00000C=)CD
a
CL
tJ orn m O o0 00 00 00 00 .• W tJ
C
a
r' UQ (D r'
00o0o-P.000o000
�?
t7
�
x
o0ooO0o000oo��
orn�]tIJ
O -P rn 0o VA :-] �o 00 :-] W N O
pcl
co
00 -P M LA
CTtJ00tn VAOI\NOrn•P-rnJ
CD
Cn-1 NO
CD oil CID CD ccn (-D ^
.
CD Cn
n G
C�
C�
C.

Stream: Stevens Creek Sta. 1
` Location: SR 3125
Date: 8/26/97 1440
Bank 1: 1 Feet
Bank 2: 6 Feet
Enter values:
Distance I
Depth
IRevolutnsi
Seconds
1.50
0.10
10
40
2.00
0.20
0
40
2.50
0.30
0
40
3.00
0.25
14
40
3.50
0.20
24
40
4.00
0.20
8
40
4.50
0.20
8
40
5.00
0.15
10
40
5.50
0.05
2
40
6.00
Total Width:
Total Area:
Calculated Discharge:
Calculated Velocity:
5.00 feet
0.83 Feet Squared
0.18 CFS
0.21 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
ocim tirea wisc
0.50
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.50
0.35
0.13
0.04
0.50
0.60
0.10
0.06
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.02
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.02
0.50
0.25
0.08
0.02
0.50
0.05
0.03
0.00
Stream: Stevens Creek Sta. 1.5 Total Width: 6.50 feet
Location: Stevens Cr. at confluence with Goose Cr. Total Area: 2.29 Feet Squared
Date: 8/26/97 1245 Calculated Discharge: 0.74 CFS
Bank 1: 0.5 Feet Calculated Velocity: 0.32 Feet/sec
Bank 2: 7 Feet
Enter values:
istance I Depth IRevolutnsl Seconds
1.50
0.26
16
40
2.00
0.32
15
40
2.50
0.37
12
41
3.00
0.40
3
40
4.00
0.45
10
42
4.50
0.40
20
40
5.00
0.44
22
40
5.50
0.42
30
40
6.00
0.50
10
40
6.50
0.48
0
40
7.00
-
Width
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.7.5
0.75
0.50
0.56
0.50
0.50
0.50
Velocity
0.45
0.40
0.38
0.29
0.08
0.24
0.50
0.55
0.75
0.25
0.00
wxd velxarea
Area
0.06
0.13
0.16
0.19
0.30
0.34
0.20
0.22
0.21
0.25
'0.24
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.16
0.06
0.00

t
Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 2
Location: SR 1004
Date: 8/26/97 1400
Bank 1: 1 Feet
Bank 2: 6.3 Feet
Enter values:
Distance
l Depth I
Revolutnsl
Seconds 1
2.00
0.25
4
40
3.00
0.49
6
40
3.50
0.50
8
40
4.00
0.42
6
40
4.50
0.54
8
40
5.00
0.55
9
40
5.50 0.52 11 40
6.00 0.44 11 40
6.30
Total Width:
5.30 feet
Total Area:
2.06 Feet Squared
Calculated Discharge:
0.40 CFS
Calculated Velocity:
0.19 FecUsec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
h
I Velocityl
Area
I Discharge)
1.00
0.10
0.25
0.03
0.75
. 0.15
0.37
0.06
0.50
0.20
0.25
0.05
0.50
0.15
0.21
0.03
0.50
0.20
0.27
0.05
0.50
0.23
0.28
0.06
0.50
0.28
0.26
0.07
0.40
0.28
0.18
0.05
Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 2.5 Total Width: 5.00 feet
Location: Goose Cr. at Confluence with Stevens creek Total Area: 2.09 Feet Squared
Date: 8/26/97 1300 Calculated Discharge: 0.57 CFS
Bank 1: 1.5 Feet Calculated Velocity: 0.27 Feet/sec
Bank 2: 6.5 Feet
Enter values:
Distance I
Depth
IRevolutnsl
Seconds
2.00
0.78
10
40
2.50
0.70
12
40
3.00
0.60
10
40
3.50
0.60
12
40
4.00
0.51
12
40
4.50
0.40
10
40
5.00
0.20
10
40
5.50
0.20
10
40
6.00
0.18
11
40
6.50
rev/sec w x d vel x area
h I
Velocity)
Area
I Discharge
0.50
0.25
0.39
0.10
0.50
0.30
0.35
0.11
0.50
0.25
0.30
0.08
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.09
0.50
0.30
0.26
0.08
0.50
0.25
0.20
0.05
0.50
0.25
0.10
0.03
0.50
0.25
0.10
0.03
0.50
0.28
0.09
0.02

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 4
Location: SR 1525
Date: 8/28/97 1030
Bank 1: 1 Feet
i Bank 2: 11.5 Feet
Enter values:
Distance I
Depth
I Kevolutnsl
Seconds
2.00
1.00
8
41
2.50
0.84
12
41
3.00
0.70
18
40
4.00
0.70
24
40
4.50
0.92
18
40
5.00
0.80
11
40
6.00
0.80
2
40
7.00
0.70
2
40
8.00
0.70
2
40
9.00
0.50
2
40
10.00
-.0:25
12
40
10.50
0.28
18
40
11.00
0.20
8
40
11.50
Stream: Goose Creek
Location: SR 1004
Date: 8/26/97 1115
Bank 1: 2.5 Feet
Bank 2: 12 Feet
Enter values:
S ta. 5
eoth Wevolutnsl Secon
3.00
0.61
22
42
3.50
0.80
20
40
4.00
0.80
18
40
4.50
0.80
18
40
5.00
0.62
16
40
5.50
0.60
15
40
6.00
0.50
14
40
6.50
0.52
8
40
7.00
0.35
8
40
8.00
0.30
12
40
9.00
0.20
2
40
10.00
0.10
0
40
11.00.
0.10
0
40
12.00
Total Width: 10.50 feet
Total Area: 6.41 Feet Squared
Calculated Discharge: 1.47 CFS
Calculated Velocity: 0.23 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
h
l Velocity)
Area I
Discharge
0.75
0.20
0.75
0.15
0.50
0.29
0.42
0.12
0.75
0.45
0.53
0.24
0.75
0.60
0.53
0.32
0.50
0.45
0.46
0.21
0.75
0.28
0.60
0.17
1.00
0.05
0.80
_ 0.04
1.00
0.05
0.70'
0.04
1.00
0.05
0.70
0.04
1.00
0.05
0.50
0.03
0.75
0.30
0.19
0.06
0.50
0.45
0.14
0.06
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.02
Total Width:
Total Area:
Calculated Discharge:
Ca:culated Velocity:
9.50 feet
3.59 Feet Squared
1.25 CFS
0.35 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
Area I Disc
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.18
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.18
0.50
0.40
0.31
0.12
0.50
0.38
0.30
0.11
0.50
0.35
0.25
0.09
0.50
0.20
0.26
0.05
0.75
0.20
0.26
0.05
1.00
0.30
0.30
0.09
1.00
0.05
0.20
0.01
1.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.10
0.00

Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 6
Location: SR 1533
Date: 8/26/97 1400
Bank 1: 2 Feet
Bank 2: 12.8 Feet
Enter values:
stance I Depth Revolutns Seco
4.00
0.25
5.00
0.30
6.00
0.40
7.00
0.40
8.00
0.40
9.00
0.35
10.00
0.30
11.00
0.30
12.00
0.30
12.80
-
Total Width:
10.80 feet
Total Area:
3.22 Feet Squared
Calculated Discharge:
0.83 CFS
Calculated Velocity:
0.26 Feet/sec
rev/sec w x d vel x area
.h
I Velocity)
Area
I Discharge
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.06
1.00
0.26
0.25
0.07
1.00
0.03
0.30
0.01
1.00
0.13
0.40
0.05
1.00
0.30
0.40
0.12
1.00
0.20
0.40
0.08
1.00
0.37
0.35
0.13
1.00
0.42
0.30
0.13
1.00
0.47
0.30
0.14
0.90
0.16
0.27
0.04
Stream: Goose Creek Sta. 6 Total Width: 12.50. feet
Location: SR 1533 Total Area: 3.34 Feet Squared
Date: 8/27/97 900 Calculated Discharge: 1.00 CFS
Bank 1: 1 Feet Calculated Velocity: 0.30 Feet/sec
Bank 2: 13.5 Feet
Enter values:
Distance
I Depth
lRevolutnsl
Seconds
2.00
0.25
12
40
3.00
0.25
12
40
4.00
0.23
14
40
5.00
0.25
13
40
6.00
0.27
16
42
7.00
0.37
16
42
8.00
0.40
14
42
9.00
0.38
12
40
10.00
0.35
12
40
11.00
0.22
12
40
12.00
0.22
4
42
13.00
0.20
2
40
13.50
rev/sec w x d vel x area
Width IVelocitvI Area Discha7
1.00
0.30
0.25
0.08
1.00
0.35
0.23
0.08
1.00
0.33
0.25
0.08
1.00
0.38
0.27
0.10
1.00-
0.38
0.37
0.14
1.00
0.33
0.40
0.13
1.00
0.30
0.38
0.11
1.00
0.30
0.35
0.11
1.00
0.30
0.22
0.07
1.00
0.10
0.22
0.02
0.75
0.05
0.15
0.01

_d
b� bd 0 cn
v
01\
J,
N000o��N000CT
4,
CD
00
N..W
N
n
^.R
CT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
^ O �]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NCD
R00
m
z�
N
x
0
'v,
'O�t
CAD
00
(-A
v
00
ON
Vi
W
(.A
LA
W
Q.
f-A
:A.
iW
to
O
CD
CD
G
In
In
Ili
W
O
CD
Ili
CD
(-A\10
CD
�- +
CT
LA
--IN
CD
CD
CD CD
00
CD
C
C
can
CCD
CD CD �-
0
LA
CD
�• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �•-�--' O
.~'-"+
n
00 O c C G O
C OOOOG000 GOOOOOo00ILA
ci
n
n �
0 0 p G C 0 0 0 G O 0 G O 0 0 0 o O C
a d ~7
0\�1oC)l\ W OOo000�
C�
CD C).
N N N tJ w w N w w W
a
_
cn O�� W Owl �o000o00o�N0 N Wlh
c
ujCD OpOO.A X�O1�OC-PCO-PCLA
d
�
n
C p p C O p O G p p o 0 0 0 C o 0 o C
OCDb 0D-
Op �uj\,Co0Oo--lo00000OG0000
CD
W CA\10O
T7 n 'T1 C7
-11 CD CD
C
o
w
a

D CO
O O
O
O
W
0
O
O
IV
O
J
0
O
O
IV
O
00
O O
IV IV
V O
pW!l-) pVoo--1
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O
d
r
Cdtd o Co
Cn
-P
W
N
n
»
CJ CD
OOO�n
xx p'�
O
O
O
O
N~ F
C
(D
N
x
0000
D
CD
O
O
O
O
CD
C^ CD r
o
o
�ICn(.n
O,�00\J\Jr-
W
MO
W
01MloCln1.0O
cn
C/)
cn
(D
n
01
00
.P.
-A.
-P
.fP
.P
-h
-P
-A
4�,
.A
4�,
4�,
-P�,
.P
-P
.A
.P
Cs
-Cn- KNOW N OOO�-
I
Q.
OO r- OO
n
v, \^, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --1 to
O:n OOOOOOOOOOOOOOCn O
n �
CC�D
CD
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo00O
N
(D o. y
W- - IV IV IQ W N IQW W 4!:, N W 4 4
�'
CD
y p
P N In Q. N ON W �,O (.AW M U \,J
d p E
CD �,
CD p
OOOOOOOOOo00p0ooC)O-
X
?-
O G IV IV IV W W W W IV — �--� �--� IV IN. W � —
p
C
r 7p CD ^_
v, �: OL:000OOOOOIn OOO(LA O
d
�
�
x
O O O^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p
O O• W -`l
O 0000 00000000OORq
G
N\�^.-\O
IV IV I'J A (= v J 77 \,J .P tV W O'\ \�O Lli �1 Vi
(D
--1 01, W O
-rl n '7j N
CD � CD
C
.n
0

r
rz td o
N
N
N
N
r
r
-
f
F� P- .y
W
N
G
"o
00
J
al
(il
1�
W
N
r-
CD
\D
oo
--1
O%
c.n
n
�' � d -. P,
O
O
O
O
O
G
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
D
-' O
G
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(D
O
N~ P
ci
C)
O
O
G
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
O
G
0
CD
CD
CD
0
0
CD
0
C
O\
IQ
W
W
W
IJ
W
W
W
.J'.
W
A
.IP
-P
W
IJ
(J
r
tJ
�.o
.0
n
O
N
V i
O
O
O
o
i J
(-A
O
O
(-A
(-A
O
O
o
IQ
C A
O
O
-A
W
�l
Q
C D
ni CDD
1
'
CAD
Can
(DD C
CD
C
O
O
-P
"D
G
C,D
tJ
Vr
�D
N
O
G
I'D
W
N
�l
O
O
r
C/)
C/)
CD
0
�j
w
OOINO
O
I
10
iANCDN OOc
l
r-
n
O C^ O C G G G O O G O G O o O O O G
n
O C C C 0 CD C C O G 0 0 0 O O O G O O C
C)
C�
O C G G O O O G O G O O O G O O O O O C
O
N
C
C. -�
IQ 1'J 1-1IQ W N tJ IJ W IQ N IJ IQ W tJ N �--� O G
G IQ ',> 4= ---I IQ � IQ' C � c.n N O� r Do V �l O G
O
a-
o�
G C C C O O C C O G O O G G O O O O O GCD
R
IJ W '.13 IJ W W i ✓, ' ,J P P W IJ IJ
CIL
CD
n
C N Cn O O C O IJ Vi O C l.n Vi o 0 CD IQ Cn O C
Ln
c�
C7
X
CC 000 OGGOOOGGOCID
O to
J
N �ooC
r 1J c .�.._.^"^,a-5 woGCOOCDCD
cD
V,.Ja o
-pn�
-�y
l' CD ^J
r.n

d
r
td td o U)
W tJ O "O 00 D\ Cn 4�,. w N p \O 00
x
O O O O p C O 6 66 6 6 666 C C 6 0 0
0
O
O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
N~
m C�
g
d�
En
O p p O O p p C C CD p 0 0 0 p CD CD 0 0 0
10
" 00 CD
IJ w w IJ 1J (,) (,) 1J 'i,,) (, IJ l,) IJ :p, IJ s IJ *- (O C
j� N N ' n
OOC Vets OOvl Vi0 ViCtJOOOOOLALA
W CnJONQ
CD ITI � r.
"
o(D
00
c
�
�l 0N00k�o0\ONv00�10001, \O11Ow CD CD
vim,
P P .P .P -9�..P -r- 4�L � -P -P
0
a.
00
OWC N LAoN h-A CNOtJW OOC
W
a
OppCpp .^-.O pOOCOOOOO-j
n�
O00000C^C p 00000000CCi
w C)
c
C
CD p p C O p^ C p O C 0"p p p CD CD p C)
0�
a
C- -� O
00G\000li Vr tJ W W n0000 Vr is N NCCC
CD CD CD p 0 p p O C 0 0 0 CD CD p 0 0 0 0 0
x r= D
W N !P tJ IJ (.n p p
p
c .. (IQ CD
p ^ Vi vi C :n Vl O '✓1 CD IQ C p C.: O O to -P
`
d
O O p p p 0 0^ p p O p p O C C O O
p 0 -A p
C gip.^ •:D _- C.- �oOC C)^Oo0000
wvlv,-P
0 -00Otn
�'
Pv,(-AX.U,� r� O\W�; P.P.WCnCC
CD
�O'\o.0
-TI —1
CD C/5 2
C
n r_

1 I I I I I I I
oo�Ooo� rnv, 4�,- W
w00000000
000000000
Ap�000
s
d r
y td td o .C„
D000
trf co G7
d oo O
-- cn
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
CD
O
O
CD
CD
O
C
lJ
�
J
n
O
O
O
O
V I
J�
O
LA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
-
W
W
-1
('D
x
CD
C
C/)
..
CD CD
CD CD r
O
r. O
V�
f
W
Cn
[J
-P�
tJ
O
"D
M
U
Q\
W
r-
O
C„
C/
CD
n
-
P
�
�
-P
-P
�
�
�
-A
�
-P
-P
P
•P
-P
-A
-P
Cs.
O .
OOtJ. W 0 NOW 0000
O.
ON O O O O O O p p O o CD - CD p o O O
v, O O O O O C C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(DCD�
3' r.
p o o O p o o C o O O C 0 0 0 o C
O�
CD Q.
00 � tJ tJ W tJ N tJ--00000
f
0
Cs. '30
W 00 N �D O\ W W W O
p p C O p O p O O p p p O p 0 0 0(
X
F� Y EL
p N" IJ " •P W •P � (-A � W W W - N -
P
C
R OM CD f
l O C LA � O (-n p O o 0 0 0 0 0 p 0
d
<
n
X
ppOo pOpppCDpOpOCpC
0CD4-
OpOC 6 -CD6666
ooW
CDIJ 0\W OO\,OCD ON OHO
CD
CROW F-O
n CD
D (-D CD
C (n
CD �
P%
CD
r-

Date:
To:
� 7`� r ,om EW
Soil & Environmental• Consultants Inc.
�r .
231 16th Avenue NE • ■ Hickory, North Carolina 28601 ■ (704) 322-b7Q4il�ia704�`:�2f164
o
. Facsimile Sheet
Fax Number [phone]
\CM-1 Time Sent:
Name: 6TSVE
Company: 1 SAGE �S1kiE1/t1,L
cc: M�
Utc 2 1997
"1'ISION or k1Y!l1011r
�'`°`a,�„�+'.�Lf Cc�flhrllflFilCs�.`i`ifllr
Oyz� o, �1oo 1 t4:Lt�.
Fax Number:'704 a`i l -ASSS
From: GEES-1S Subject: IPLetw '' T R-�t' •
Number of pages including transmittal sheet:
For your comments/approval
Per our conversation
Please advise
Would like to discuss
Hard Copy Sent:
US regular mail
UPS overnight
Federal Express
Other
For your information
Per your request
Please call
Please handle
Hand delivery
US certified
No hard copy sent
Remarks: CdT-1 'OF R-G�bQ GQbSSt+JC� Oerb %%- Tb
1-�lCa2E �t t�• A.�Ufl Mo�E Pip C tN
N "toF� )
0p,
F�/R0N' Nr S 199>
If you have any questions or problems with the transmission, please contact
at [phone].
Confidentiality Notice
This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that nay disclosure, distribution or copying of this. information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this %-,.
transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the faxed documents to us at the above
address via the United States Postal Service.
Wetland Delmeation/Permitting/Mmgation Soil/Site Evaluation for On -Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments
Home Office: 244 West Millbrook Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

s
VO"
NAO . 10-64
a

DEC 1997
OF E�V,irpy„+r �_
vmo
FAX TRANSM ITTAtws �:, ftt �k(.GFFtcE'2'07
DATE: !J 2Z 7
TIME: f
# OF PAGES_ Y (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
TO: 1�Ais 17"
COMPANY:'
HARRIS ENGINEERING
Engineering
Planning• Surveying
PHONE'#: FAX #: �' & " 327- /--- —
FROM: N
PROJECT NAME:
MESSAGE TO RECIPIENT:_
JOB #:
Ao s slm
�l
13251qardingPlacc
Charlotte, NC 28204
704.334.1325
704334.1330 Fir

U\00
/T• 2y `
FPS• `� � _��\ {
I~
N

r"
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE - ■ Hickory, North Carolina 28601 ■ [phone] ■ Fax [phone]
Transmittal
To: ��� G G� �' Project #: Date:
lL-c,-9-1
%G22roject Name:,LSA{�
`
�1.•\V'
LPL %)C I File:
We Transmit to you Herewith:
Drawings
Specifications
Brochures or photos
Correspondence
Under Separate Cover:
For your information and files By mail
For comment or approval By courier
Returned for correction, resubmit By express
Approved as noted
No. Copies
Document No. I
Date
Des o
(
t�� PG A. -Pip
Lc—� �=�`i0�t2 Cc�t�►���
Remarks: J D ! D0044
%
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
,
1
v
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluation for On -Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments
Home Office: 244 West N illbrook Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

US Army Corps of Engineers
A= Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Room 143
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Chapin and Mr. Domey.
S&EC, Inc. 2-1.026
September 25, 1997
NCDEHNR - DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Domey
4401 Reedy Creek Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: MINOR REVISIONS TO PERMIT APPLICATION:
APPLICATION DATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1997
Pleasant Plains Road Property
Mecklenburg and Union Counties
John Weiland Homes
Per phone conversations with Mr. Chapin.
Impacts to channels are as follows, see maps for additional information.:
Area 7: (NW 26 - 124 linear feet of 2 foot wide intermittent channel: 248 sf.)
• Impacts proposed under Nationwide 26.
• Impacts are associated with the footprint of the proposed house. Moving the house "back" will
result in the loss of more channels.
• Impacts are to an intermittent channel and will result in no loss of significant function.
Therefore, these impacts do not count to the maxi urn loss of 500 linear feet of streams under
the Nationwide Permit program.
Area 8: (NW 2 118 ' ear feet of 3foot wide intermittent channel: 354 sf.)
• Impacts pr ' der Nationwide 26.
• Impacts are associated with a road crossing to access high ground. Crossing is minimum
needed for a stable crossing.
• Impacts will result in the loss of significant functions that occur within the existing channel.
This impact counts toward the 500 linear foot maximum under the Nationwide program. No
mitigation for losses is proposed because impacts to streams are less than 150 linear feet under
this permit.
Area 9: (NW 14 -120 linear feet of 4 foot wide intermittent channel: 480 sf.) 1n O
(NW 13 - 50 linear feet of 4 foot wide intermittent channel: 240 sf.)
• Impacts have been separated into the above permits for the purpose of clarifying proposed
work; all of the impacts were previously requested under Nationwide 26.
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/site Evaluation for On -Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments
Home Office: 244 West Millbrook Road ` Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

• Impacts under Nationwide 14 are associated with a road crossing to access high ground
Crossing is minimum needed for a stable crossing. One crossing is proposed
• Impacts under Nationwide 13 are associated with bank stabilization required because of minor
modifications in flow directions.
• Impacts under Nationwide 26, associated with lot fill necessary to prevent flooding in the lot
and channel relocation, have been dropped -
Total impacts to Waters of the US, per permit, for the project are as follows:
Permit
e of loss
Significant loss
Impact area
impact length
Nationwide 26
Int. Channel
No
124 if
248 sf
Nationwide 26
Int. Channel
Yes
118 if
462 sf
Nationwide 14
Int. Channel
Yes
1201f
480 sf
Nationwide 13
Int. Channel
Yes
50 if
200 sf
Please call if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
Chris Huysman
Biologist

10-1
(4' OF L54, L60-
a44--L46)
a ,,max LOCIATtO
v11 \ OF C.GLNrY LINE
91
J� O.L. PHILLIP5 HEIRS
. ► h8 126, PS. 029
TERS of VOSS
oor PROPOSEb TO efi
IMPo6TED•

OF COUNTY LUG \ �.
FKA6E 2, MAP 2 SLOC.K 2
GAB. E. FILE 105 3 �\
I
2 \ `�
I
�►]ry k� r '
4b� w
FROVIV04cE MLLs
PKA6E 2, MAP 2
C.AB. E. FILE l05:
I
pry \ .
L.J `
;y
OL P tLLiP5 rER5
Y8. 126. F6. 029
Nq�R of u�
Fgo
BE MPAf*T9w

DEM ID:
Corps Action ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NATIONWIDE 13
Pre -Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1. Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2. Application for Section 401 Certification
3. Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of the
Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to the NC
Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE PRINT.
Owner's Name:
2. Mailing Address:
Subdivision Name:
City: ATLANTA
JOHN WIELAND HOMES
ATTN: MR. PAUL GONWA
1950 SULLIVAN ROAD
State: GA Zip Code: 30337
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above):
3. Telephone Number (Home):
(Work):770 / 996-2400
4. If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS,- INC. Phone: [phone]
231 16T" AVENUE NE Fax: [phone]
HICKORY, NC 28601
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or aerial
photograph with scale):
County: MECK. AND UNION Nearest town or city: STALLINGS, NC
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
WEST OF STALLINGS, NC: SOUTH OF NCSR 1364 AND WEST OF NCSR 1357 AS
SHOWN ON SITE VICINITY MAP (USGS / MATHEWS).
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river. UT WEST FORK TWELVEMILE
River Basin: CATAWBA RIVER
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality waters
(HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-II)?
YES (❑) NO (®) If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management area of
environmental concern (AEC)? YES (❑) NO (® )

7c. If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal counties),
what is the land use plan (LUP) designation? NOT APPLICABLE
8a. -Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES (❑) NO (®) If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES (❑ ) NO ( ® ) If yes, describe anticipated work:
NO ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE ANTICIPATED
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land:
ACRES TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 35
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project -site:
APPROXIMATELY 0.33 ACRES OF VEGETATED WETLANDS AND
APPROXIMATELY 1600 LINEAR FEET OF WATERS OF THE US
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: Excavation:
Flooding: Other: 0.004 AC BANK STABILIZATION
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.004 ACRES
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide
distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 50 LINEAR FEET After: 50 LINEAR FEET
Width Before (based on normal high water contours): 4 FEET
Width After: APPROXIMATELY 12 FEET
Average depth before: 0.0 TO 0.3 FEET After: SAME
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ❑ Placement of pipe in channel: ❑
Channel Excavation: ❑ Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ❑
Other: BANK AND BED STABILIZATION
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to the
pond?
NOT PROPOSED
What is the expected pond surface area?

12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to
be used (attach plans 8 112" x I T' drawings only):
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
13. Purpose of proposed work:
NECESSARY IMPACTS FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. PROVIDE HOUSING
FOR REGION.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
ALL IMPACTS ARE MINIMUM NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
SUBDIVISION. BANK STABILIZATION NECESSARY FOR POST DEVELOPMENT
STORMFLOWS ASSOCIATED' WITH CONSTRUCTION. ROAD CROSSINGS ARE
PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW. LOT FILL ASSOCIATED WITH VEGETATED
WETLANDS TOTAL 0.25 ACRES TO ISOLATED WETLANDS AND SOME
INTERMITTENT CHANNELS. CHANNELS NOT IMPACTED BY THESE PROPOSED
ACTIVITIES TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 1200 LINEAR FEET AND WILL BE LEFT
WITHIN STORMWATER EASEMENTS.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding the
presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened
species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed
project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
TO BE COMPLETED BY USACE AS NEEDED.
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see agency
address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit area which
may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
TO BE COMPLETED BY USACE AS NEEDED.
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES (❑) NO (®) If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental, Policy Act?
YES (❑) NO (❑)
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State
Clearinghouse?
YES (❑) NO (❑) NOT APPLICABLE
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state -
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to Ms.
Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of

Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003, telephone
[phone].
18. The following items should be included with -this application if proposed activity involves
the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the
'property (for Nationwide Permit numbers '14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All streams
(intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the map. Map
scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? RESIDENTIAL / AGRICULTURAL
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? SANITARY SEWER
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable. -
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management
(Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) 'A letter from the. North Carolina Division, of
Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent with the North
Carolina Coastal Management program.
ar's/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature valid only if
Agent Authorization Letter. from
the owner is provided (18 g.))
Date

IDIALT IG
Corps Action ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NATIONWIDE 14
Pre -Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1. Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2. Application for Section 401 Certification
3. Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of the
Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to the NC
Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE PRINT.
Owner's Name:
2. Mailing Address:
Subdivision Name:
City: ATLANTA
JOHN WIELAND HOMES
ATTN: MR. PAUL.GONWA
1950 SULLIVAN ROAD
State: GA Zip Code: 30337
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above):
3. Telephone Number (Home):
(Work):770 / 996-2400
4. If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Phone: [phone]
231 16T" AVENUE NE Fax: [phone]
HICKORY, NC 28601
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or aerial
photograph with scale):
County: MECK. AND UNION Nearest town or city: STALLINGS, NC
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
WEST OF STALLINGS, NC: SOUTH OF NCSR 1364 AND WEST OF NCSR 1357 AS
SHOWN ON SITE VICINITY MAP (USGS / MATHEWS).
6. Impacted or nearest stream/river. UT WEST FORK TWELVEMILE
River Basin: CATAWBA RIVER
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality waters
(HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-II)?
YES (❑ ) NO (®) If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management area of
environmental concern (AEC)? YES (❑) NO (® )

J
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal counties),
what is the land use plan (LUP) designation? NOT APPLICABLE
-8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES (❑) NO ( ® ) If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and
any additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES (❑ ) NO ( ® ) If yes, describe anticipated work:
NO ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE ANTICIPATED
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land:
ACRES TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 35
9b. Estimated total number or acres of wetlands located on project site:
APPROXIMATELY 0.33 ACRES OF VEGETATED WETLANDS AND
APPROXIMATELY 1600 LINEAR FEET OF WATERS OF THE US
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.011 ACRES Excavation:
Flooding: Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.011 ACRES
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide
distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 120 LINEAR FEET After: 120 LINEAR FEET
Width Before (based on normal high water contours): 4 FEET
Width After: PIPE
Average depth before: 0.0 TO 0.3 FEET After: SAME
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ❑ Placement of pipe in channel:
Channel Excavation: ❑ Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ❑
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to the
pond?
NOT PROPOSED
What is the expected pond surface area?

12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to
be used (attach plans 8 1/2" x 11" drawings only):
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
13. Purpose of proposed .work:
NECESSARY IMPACTS FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. PROVIDE HOUSING
FOR REGION.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts):
ALL IMPACTS ARE MINIMUM NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
SUBDIVISION. BANK STABILIZATION NECESSARY FOR POST DEVELOPMENT
STORMFLOWS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION. ROAD CROSSINGS ARE
PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW. LOT FILL ASSOCIATED WITH VEGETATED
WETLANDS TOTAL 0.25 ACRES TO ISOLATED WETLANDS AND SOME
INTERMITTENT CHANNELS. CHANNELS .NOT IMPACTED BY THESE PROPOSED
ACTIVITIES TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 1200 LINEAR FEET AND WILL BE LEFT
WITHIN STORMWATER EASEMENTS.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding the
presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened
species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed
project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
TO BE COMPLETED BY USACE AS NEEDED.
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see agency
address sheet) regarding the presence. of historic properties in the permit area which
may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
TO BE COMPLETED BY USACE AS NEEDED.
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES (❑) NO (0) If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
YES (❑) NO (❑)
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State
Clearinghouse?
YES (❑) NO (❑) NOT APPLICABLE
If answers to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to Ms.
Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of

Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003, telephone
[phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves
the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the
property for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29 and 38). All streams
(intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the map. Map
scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the
placement of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? RESIDENTIAL / AGRICULTURAL
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage. disposal? SANITARY SEWER
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable.
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management
(Water Quality) certification, and
-3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent with the North
Carolina Coastal Management program.
ner's/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature valid only if
Agent Authorization Letter from
the owner is provided (18 g.))
10-�3-92
Date

a
Corps Action ID: counties),
quested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): NATIONWIDE 26
perty?
Pre -Construction Notification Application mit and
is that Require:
i to the Corps of Engineers
i for Section 401 Certification
m with the NC Division of Coastal Management
(1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of the
;ee agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to the NC
ntal Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE PRINT.
JOHN WIELAND HOMES
ATTN: MR. PAUL GONWA
is: 1950 SULLIVAN ROAD
ame:
% State: GA Zip Code: 30337
ass, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above):
mber (Home): (Work):770 / 996-2400 i ACRES
igent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number: provide
;ONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Phone: [phone]
N U E NE Fax: [phone]
28601
:T
)rk (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or aerial
th scale):
C: AND UNION Nearest town or city: STALLINGS, NC
ion (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
ALLINGS, NC: SOUTH OF NCSR 1364 AND WEST OF NCSR 1357 AS
3)ITE VICINITY MAP (USGS / MATHEWS).
aarest stream/river. UT WEST FORK TWELVEMILE
:ATAWBA RIVER D
L)
led near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality waters
ending resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-II)?
NO (®) If yes, explain:
s located within a North Carolina division of coastal management area of
I concern (AEC)? YES (❑ ) NO (® )
ling to the