310667_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210119

& Division of Water Resources 8 ]M S
Facility Number 3l - (p(o O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Zoutine
ance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other - O Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time: 1 ° a Departure Time: County: ,ply Region: W I fro
Farm Name: L-i n o10.� S �ar'w� Owner Email:
Owner Name: He nr � Lutp s Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: (�,�\�, <—cver�>-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: 'S 1- 19`;?'
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I E] I I Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
nry Pnultry Cnnaeity Pon_
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
h: h t d 1 th t h d t f the State ( allons)9
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
64o
DNA
❑NE
c. W at is t o estima e vo ume a reac e wa ers o g
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9�0
❑ NA ❑NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Number: 1 jDate of inspection: ! 9 a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VNo
N❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: f r '4 f?jv.CK
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ,► q S 5
Observed Freeboard (in): a l a a
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
[:]Yes Eq-11U ❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes L:Wo' ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �,�
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Lj'llc ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [9- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 5 , W i C , WC
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o 0 NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
40 ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
1 0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes [ki o
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E315o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: a l
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No FE<A. ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes C21<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ✓ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
I/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0- ° NA ❑ NE
o DNA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
I i 1 S: c..s'oc icr" 1 do escS-hvt SS U CS' Crt-, 1
Gink QJc" ?�� -H;e �el d
�cf� 1��dort C7=3,1� T3
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
V_5', Merrick �o n��-ru LTtia1ti
Phone: [.°I 10 ) � (}- 9 S77
Date: I I I Val
21412015