WQ0004381_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

r
Pat McCrory
Governor
fk
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
May 21, 2015
Mr, Michael Fox, WVVTP Supervisor
City of Conover
P.O. Box 549
Conover, North Carolina 28613-0549
Subject: Non -Discharge Permit Inspection and
Acknowledgement of Receipt of 2014 Annual Report
City of Conover WWTP - Permit No,- WQ000438,1
Land Application of Residuals
Catawba County
Dear Mr, Fox:
The Mooresville Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection, on May 7"', 2015, This was a
final permit inspection as a result of your Permit Rescission Request, and included a records
review and site visit to the Northeast WWTP. The annual report, which was reviewed prior to
inspection, reflected there was no land application in 2014.
The hauling records to the Hickory Regional Compost Facility were complete to date and the
residuals processing and storage areas appeared well maintained at the time of inspection.
The attached report should be self-explanatory', however, if you have questions please contact me
by phone [phone]) or email (Maria, schuge@n cde nr. qov) .
Sincerely,
X
Maria Schutte, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachment" Inspection Report May 2015
CC: Ed Hardee, LAU Compliance, CO -Raleigh (email)
1 /It
Moore vide Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, Nor Carolina 28115
Phone. [phone] Fax: [phone] / Customer Service 1-877-623-67 48
Internet www,ncdenr,goy
An Eq,c n oppoTtuntp ArfErmat"veAcron rmployer - Moe in part by recycM paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory, Governor
Donald van der Vaart, Secretary
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL 11VORALITIOA'
City/Town/ONvner: CJV of Conover County: Catawba
Penint No.: )X
Issue& 10/05/2005 Expiration: 09/30/2014 Inactive: 05/11,12015
Pernfittee Contact. Michael L Fox 1"A')X7T'P S Telephone No.- 828-465-227-t '�TP
LA ORC: Michael L Fox. Cert #: 13541 , relephone No.: 828-217-�qelt
,sr )n for Inspection
X R,OtJTIiNE---COMPf,AfN-I'--,—FOLI.,OW-UP
Tive of inspection
—Collection System —Spray Irrigation X Sludge —Other
�Lla­y7 -.20 L-5
This was a final inspection for the permit rescission, The WWTP residuals processing and storage, and
t
records management appeared to be maintained in accordance with permit conditions, at the time of
inspection,
The City of Conover will continue to process residuals through the Regional Compost facility in Hickory.
Is aBallow- up inspection necessary, _yes X no
Ins pector(s): Maria Schutte - EnvirLnimental S
Telephone No.: Fax No.: 704-6tit- 6040
-
Date of Inspection: —iyfay7 ". 2 0 15

Residuals Inspection
)N ,'QO004381 City of Conover - Northeast WWTP - Catm-,,ba County
ya of Residual
X _ Land Application (class B) Distribution and Marketing (class A)
Rec2EA_!jgERjpy, Y-yes N-no N/A -not applicable N/E-not evaluated
Y_ Copy of current permit available at residual generating site
NA Current metals and nutrient analysis (see permit for frequency)
NA TCLP analysis, NA SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)
NA Nutrientandinetals loading calculations (to determine most limiting parameter) YTD,
Y_ Hauling records (# gal and/or ton hauled during calendar year to date)
NA Field loading records, NA Field site maps and information
NT Records of time purchased
NA Pathogen and VAR
* Comments: °eviouse orts., 'the Southeast 111f,77P has not
o )erated or tie Vortheast JflT'TP. These residuals are
either hauled directly to the Hi kor , Com o fi t a�cili ek
W l tag e
Treatment
X Aerobic digestion —Autotherm al Thermophilie Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic digestion — Drying beds
Alkaline Stabilization Lime —Other-describe Bell Press
TraMpoirt There was no residuals haufin)� 111rin this in_SP_e_Cti0fL
gjurin this i
Spill control plan in transport vehicle'? NA
Does transport vehicle appear to be maintained? NA
Stara per previous rep. ores
Number of days/weckS/Months of storage:
residuals to the �Tou n o �Wei�vton or �,)roc�essLing throu h their Vant, tiara -d re_n_tut-illi thefi-ch
as:q�
I fil ; I
7 b n -)- vi�,ith be i Oress and a (acent truck,
Describe storage: The residuals stot 117e tank dc-ivaterij , Whil at the tim o
ar e fin .,?,
Odors present N Vectors present N
SAMRlin i,� �acifi , �has iq�ot Land allLliedr byears,
Ri j —
Is sampling adequate? NE Is sampling representative? NE
Field Sites Lend use for class B b_i0_8_0_1_id_sJ N24- fray fi the on.
Monitoringae-1-11-s) Ylid _N

pvp4e

P C IrT V
ITY OF CONOVER PURUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M11111 I IM11 WIN 110111 11111 11111,11
P.O. BCD: 549 Phone [phone]
CONOVEk NC 28613-0549
April 23, 201S RECEIVEDMENRIDWR
Mr. Ed Hardee A P R 3 0 `5
Division of Water Resources WatarQualfty
1617 Mail Service Center Peroftfins Seeflot,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-161-1
Dear Mr. Hardee:
The City of Conover INEWWTP :NC0024252 did not lari(J apply
sludge during the year of 2014. Pill of our residuals are sent
to our Regional Compost Faciiity permit WQ004563. We have a
county lined landfill as a backup source of disposal. We have
not land applied sludge in over 15 years. We wish to rescind
our land application permit WQ0004381.
If you have any questions, comments, or need any further
information you may call me at [phone].
Sincerely.
Michael Fox
Wastewater Treatment Supervisor

PUB11C WORKS
P.O. BOX 549 PhDne 828-464-48c8-
CONOVER, NC 28613-0549
April 23, 2015 RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
Mr. Ed Hardee APR 3 0 K,',5
Division of Water Resources water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center Pen"", Secwn
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Hardee*
The City of Conover NEWWTP NCO024252 did not land apply
sludge during the year of 2014. All of our residuals are sent
to our Regional Compost Faciiity permit WQ004563. We have a
county lined landfill as a backup source of disposal, We have
not land applied sludge in over 15 years, We wish to rescind,
car .and applicaoicn permit WQ0004381.
If you have any questions, comments, or need any further
information you may call mo at [phone].
Sincerely
Michael Fox
Wastewater Treatment Supervisor

Pat McCrory
Governor
A AL 4
7r"A
North arolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Donald RP van der Vaal
rEctolcratRIoocrotarry
April 1, 2015 Ai)R 8 2 015
CERTIFIED AIL # 7010 0780 0001 7067 5273 WOROS
FT"r 1 PT OPQ 1=-QTPn r OORF-S ILLR REGIONAL OFFICE
Jimmy A, Clary
City of Conover
Post Office Pox 549
Conover, NC 28613
Subject; NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY C -2015- C-0096
PERMIT CONDITIONS LATI
Permit No. WQ0004381
City of Conover Residuals Laid Application Program
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Clark;
This Notice of Deficiency is being sent to you for failure to submit the 2014 annual
report. One of the requirements of your non -discharge permit is the submittal of an
annual report to the [division of Water Resources by March 11 of each year. As of this
date; our records indicate that the 2014 annual report has not been submitted for the
subject facility.
This permit expired September 30, 2014, It is a condition of your permit to submit a
renewal six months before the expiration date. As of this date no renewal has been
received.
Failure to act in accordance with the terms, conditions„ or requirements of your permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 1-1.,
Non -Discharge Perrnbng Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, RWei h, North Caroline 7 99-1617
Phone: [phone]"k intemeh hMllper I n fenr o lwre
An EquN Opportunity t Affirmative Acts`on Employer — Made M part with recycled paper

Please respond to this Notice of Deficiency within fi a calendar days of its receipt, either
by submitting three copies of the annual report or records indicating the report was
submitted. Submit to:
d Hardee'
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Within 30 calendar days of receipt of this Notice of Deficiency submit a renewal
application for the permit. If you wish to rescind the permit submit a written request
stating how the residuals will be managed.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the annual report in a timely manner. A decision as to the appropriateness of an
enforcement action will be made following the receipt of your response.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ed Hardee of our Central
Office staff at e .hardee ncdenr.ov or g Igo 07-.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Branch Manager
Division of Water Resources
cc. Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Permit Files WQ0004381

EDO
DENR/DWQ/Water Quality ection 11
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
117 mail Service Center r
Raleigh, N.C. 76 9-h i7 OIt , ,
_.4,
Dear airs.
Enclosed for your review are, three espies of the Annual
Land Application Certification Form for the City of on ve"
wastewater treatment plant. The City of Conover produced 167.15
tons of residuals from the City of Conover Northeast Wastewater
Treatment Facility (NEWWTP C 2Z5,These residuals were
treated at our regional composting facility (Permit Number
0 a . None of the City of C nover'a residuals were land
applied in 2013*
If you have and questions, comments, or need any further
information you may call me at () 465-2279.
Sincerely,
1 2CO' 14 �
Michael Fox
Wastewater Treatment Supervisor
a- . r

v

FiLE
North Caroling Department of Environment and Natural Resource
Pat McCrory John E, Slyvaria, lli
Governor Secretary
June 2, 2014
r, Michael Fox, VWVTP Supervisor
City of Conover
.. Box 549
Conover, North Carolina 1 -14
Subject: lion -Discharge Permit Inspection and
Acknowledgement of Receipt of 2013 AnnualReport
City of Conover WWTP - Permit o.- WQ0004381
Land application of Residuals
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Fox.
The Mooresville Regional Office l ) conducted a compliance inspection on May t11, 2014,
which included a records review and site visit to the Northeast t Rm The annual report, which
was reviewed prior to inspection, reflected there was no lend application in 2013,
The MRO appreciates the time you took to shove us around the facility. the current permit will
expire on September 30, 2014, which means that a renewal application was duo in arch;
however, per our conversation, the. City of Conover will likely choose to rescind this permit,
because they continue to haul residuals to the Hickory Regional Compost Facility and have not
land applied in years, A letter to request rescission may be seat to Ed Hardee vie his email
gA,Hardee ncde�tr. ov
The attached report should be self-explanatory-, however, if you have questions please contact me
by phone (7 4- - 1 4) or email (m rie.s hutte ncdenr Gov):
incerely,
Dario Schutte, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachment, Inspection Report May 2014
d Hardee, LAU Compliance,; CO -Raleigh h (email)
Mooresville Regional Dace: 610 Past Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 9915
Phone: 794-55 -t 991 Internet: wwwncdenrgov
An Ertual opportunity 4 Affirmative Actin Employer'-w Marta it part by recyded paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, 111, Secretar-
y
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GE NERA L 1,VF'0R_V1,1 I ION
City,Twoar/Owner: C_itv of_ Qollq_yer , ba County: Cataw
Perrait No.: _t 0 LI Issue& I
0/05/2005 Expiration.- Q,:%/,")3i20l4
Pertnittee Contact: Michael L Fpy (WI aervtsc2r) felephono�- e N_828-465-2279 AVV�~P
—
LA ORC Narnc� Michael L. Fox Cert ft: 13541 Telephone No.: 828-217-5097 (to-,
Rgg2a.A���
_'X ROLITINF,--COMPLATNT---,----FOLI.,OW-1,JP
— Collection System _SpraN,, hTigation X S ludge _Other
Njay 7 2014
Insvecfioni �ql coinmenr t�
The WWTP residuals processing and storage, and records managernent, appeared to be maintained in
accordance with pennit conditions, at the time of inspection,
Per conversation with Mr, Fox, the City of Conover continues to process residuals through the Hickory
Compost facility and vAll likely opt to rescind their Im-id application pernift,
Is afollow-up inspection necessary _yes - X no
Inspector(s): Maria Schutte - Environmental peciali�t
Telephone No.: 704-663-1699 Fax No.: 704-663,-6040
Date of Inspection. T�I�q7' 2014

Residuals Inspection
W Q0004381 City of Conover - Northeast WW'I"P
eyes N-no N/A -not applicable NIE-,not evaluated
pg. 2
Tre of Residual
X . Land Application (class B)
Rec2Ld Keeging
Y Copy of current permit available at residual generating site
NA Current metals and nutrient analysis (see pertnit for frequency)
NA TCLP analysis, NA SSFA (Standard Soil Ferfifity,,,knalysis)
NA Nutrient and metals loading calculations to determine most limiting parameter) YTD
Y Hauling records (#gal and/or ton hauled during calendar year to date)
NA Field loading records, Y Field site maps and information
NA Records of linic, purchased
NA Pathogen and VAR
Comments: The aertnittee has naLland am fieti in years. The Southeast WTVTP has Lot o crated o
jp_ —_p f vears,
Facifib,, �br inglLyocessin
Treatment
X Aerobic digestion -Autothermal Thennophill c Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic digestion Drying beds (ma-
y not meet 503's)
l aline Stabilization Li aye —Other-describe
Transport
Spill control plan in transport vehicW.,NE
Does transport vehicle appear to be maintained? NE
StorM
Number of days/weeks./months of storagre: Each week this lant hauls a
Describe storage: The residuals storfhge tank de-n tcrirr lrrril1irrwith es,s and ac nt truck
loatfinMarc a. t ca r re rel maintained s rer tion.
Odors present N Vectors present N
Sam lin ds Lacilft-Lhasnot lantla Wed or earL k-__g jft____
Is sampling adequate? NE Is sampling representative? NE

Residuals Inspection p
WQ0004381 City of Conover - Northeast WWTP
Field Sites Lend use fog class B bies ii s' iris xc lat rats l rrr rlie r° .ertrwr.
Monitoring well(s) Y,,N,: N
If Ives, iocotion of well(s): phis pe?) :mit cjurr°e tl y does t!t re tire, tpun r° at monitotki .
Odors/vectors
Describe e y nuisance conditions d any corrective actions needed, Sorrrc� , �`� � n * il`` odors �lette` rya �r�tr�rac flee �lcxratA l�rtt r�cat ctt tlt� r��i�1h.�r� e�irrcl,rcr �� rec the dre ra
jr � ecytion,
Odors present
Vectors present
Other Hated conditions: '? 'i ° r r r a a� t r c. r a. er c onyersatio r ith ,, r°.
Eo hoitvver shouhl thet, dei c�_l a Jerre �•, �� � altc l�crrr lr rrl� a�rrl� tr'tte�l crr wracart as erssa` 1e. The
r egne: wal a jp, lication fo rmr i V-vLailtt le on- lne ate http:,,'/portzil.ncdenr.org./m,,eb/wq' p rir ial ppiic tiens

Veo is Water North America per tiServices
R9GtONAL COMPOST FACILITY • HfCKOR a°, N
Conover 1labntNyTotals -tearer-Jenuary 2013
page
CGS - WRTHEAST
omz l N
TOTAL CONOVER
GATE
T 13 1
11+ LUME
OL1
S
p1
T�1U k
VOLUME
SOLI
i S
k
T U C
VOLUME!
SOrL(
:4SS ]
p
No,a1Rcrr
s
T a
OT
SM
No.
�110rt�
TS
OT
.�
N�,,
a�f�a�s
T"
I3T
Svu
01101113„
01102113
011031132
12,000
4,5
66
2
12,000
4.55
.28-
6.6
0110411
a:
01105113
OVW13
0110711
12,000
2,84
142
642
12.000
2.84
1.42
6.4
01108113',
0110611
:-
01110113
1
6,000
4.03
1.01
6.3
2
12,000
4,61
2'Z1
TO
3
18,000
4,42
3,32
6.
01111113"s,
x
01112r13
011131131
011141131
1
6,000
4,16
1.05
6 4
0
1
6,000
419
1
6:4
0°1115/13}
O'11161'& 3
s
01117113 �
2
12,000
4,20
2.10
6 3
2
12,000
3,66
1 68
7.1
4
24,000
4.68
4.06
6,9
01118113':
01d16i13z
01120113;
n
01 P21113:
a
b
01 d22M 3,
01 /23113;
�
011241131
3
18,000
4uA 3,
333
611
2
12,000
440
225
6,8
5
30,000
4,45
5,57
6.5
01125/13'
0112661113
01#27113;;
..
01128113r
3
18,000
4.56
1
6.2
3
18,000
458
144
6.2
0112f1
01130113 v
1131113;
_
1
6e
4038
1.10
6.6
2
12,000
4,65
2.33
6.5
z
3
18,
4.56
3,42
6.8
TOTAL
13 _
76,
13,44
10
60100
11.14
23
136,
24,58
V"13,
2
11,143
4.114
0,64
6.3
2
1E000
4.45
0;3;
6.6
31
17,250
421
1.1
6.6

Vealla Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, NC
Con~ Monthly rotals . February, 2M 3
page 1
DIOSOUDS RECEIVING
I
Gad - NORTHEAST
CONOVER I NEWTON
TOTAL CONOVER
-- --
DATE
TRUCK
VOLUME �
SOLIDS
MASS I
pH
TR
06,
TRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS -MA$Spal
If an
9ti TS
DT
t
I
No,
Vftm
1% TS
DT
02/01113
02/02113
02/03/13
021"'l 31
1
6,000
4,14
1,04
61
1
6,000
414
1.04
8.1
02106/131
2
12,000
4,31
2,16
6.1
2
12,000
4,31
216
6,1
02/0&1,31
02107/131
2
12,000
4A7
224
7,0
2
12,000
4A7
224
7.
0210113i
02/09/131
021101131
021111131
2
12,000
4,41
2,21
6,2
2
12j000
4,41
2,21
61
02/121131
021131131
02114/131
1
6,000
4,33
1,08
611
2
12,OW
4,30
2,15
CS
4 3
118,000
4,31
124
8.8
02115/13'
02/16/13!
02fl 7/131
02/18113��
02/19/1 S
3
18,000
418
3,69
6.3
3
18,000
4,76
159
6�3
02120/13
02/21113�
1
6,000
4AS
1,12
6.3
12
12,OW
4.68
134
7,0
3
M000
4A1
146
6,9
=22/13'=
02t23/131
021241131
02125/13r
2
12,000
4A5
223
6.4
2
12,000
4,46
2,23
6.4
02126113
02J27/13 I
02/28/13
1
6,000
4A3
1,21
6.3
2
12,000
5.45
2,73
6,8
13
18,000
514
3,94
6.7
TOTAL 1
13
78,000
14.62
a
48,000
9AS
21
126,000
24,00
AVM 1
2
750
4.46
0,73
6a26S
__J___2
2,000
4,73
OA7 .. .. ....
...
J 2
1 _4000,,,,,
432
1,20
6,5

Veolla Water North America rating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, NC
page 1
ONO R -NORTHEAST
CONOVERINEWTON
TOT L NO R
DATE
TRUCK
UC?L ld dl
SOLOS
5
h[
TRUCK
4i LL?h�1E SOLIDS IVI
pI^t
TRUCK
�13LI IIe�E
�1LI "�
p11
No
gallons
% TS
i� `
.ca
..
41UME » T ��
s,nu
No.
Il tx�
4b
1
0310111303102/131
�
�
3113?
OW04113
x
03YO&13
031 13
t�31I'?7P13
�
II
4.53
4,5
E,
4,00
423
.5
5.
031 13
113,-
l10113r
031111131
S
30,000
3,55
4AS
5
30,000
3.55
4,49
6.
3112/13
3113/13
a
031141131
4
24,000
4,37
4.37
e.1'
€
3
4
24,000
4,37
4.37
6,1
031151i3
031161131
�
03117113'
ti
03118113i
2
12,000
4,41
2.21
E,3
I 2 12,000 4,86 145
TO
4
24,000
4465
4.65
6.8
15l13;
;
I
031=13
03/21/131
2
12,000
4$6
2.28
6.2
{ 2 12,000 513 2,57
6.9
�
4-
24,000
4h5
4.85
6.7
2113..
03123/13 €
CI 4193
5113l
2
12,000
4.33
2.17
6,2
2 12,000 4.70 Z36
7.0
4
24,000
4.52
4,52
6.7
03/2 "13 s
i
0 71131
1
0 8/13e
1
6,000
415
1 Z5
S.S
2 12,000 5,01, 2, 1
Taal
3
3
18,000
4.74
3.56
5.
03 29/13
;
vryryi.eY30113 a
�..
.
T T41L
To12fl,t)CIi1
21.5II
8 48, 5.87
28
168,
31.38
3
17143
4a34
1.08
S.2
2 12LOOO 4,83 0,49
70
4
24,000
4.52
1a57
6.5

ffa Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, N
Conover Monthly Totals - April 2013
page
RIOSOLIDS RWEIVING
CONOVER - NORTHEAST
CONOVER! NEWON
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE
TRUCK
VOL
TRLI f
VOLUME
9 LI 3
�4AT39
pH
LM t{
VOLUME
1 3
I A
Ii+S,
II n
TE
CT
No.
Ilan '
3T
T
r.�
Il n
T
13
.es
01113 ,
2 :
12,000
4.37
219
se
A
2
12,000
4,37
2,19
60
04102113,
04M3113;
t13
1
6,
4.79
1.20
6
M,
12d
4,76
2,3
? I
3
18,000
4.76
3,58
SA
�p{p
iA�N 9
14 t13
12,000
4A2
2.21
6,3
2
12,000
4A2
2.21
6.3
,
.' 1 f 3A
11d131
1
6,000
3,850.96
at
12,000
4AS
2,33
7,0
a
3
18,000
4,39
3.30
6.9
f121131
13t131.
z
d14#13
15113;
2
12,000
621
2,W
7.1
�
2
12,000
6.20
2,60
7A
04116113
S
04117113
I
1 '13'
2
12,000
4,54
2.27
63
I
.
2
12f
4,54
2.27
6,3
199113
a
04d20/13 {
i
1113
94122113
2
12,000
4,51
2.26
03
2
12,000
4,61
2.26
6,3
,041231131
4d13I
W261131
1
6,0
5,09
1,27
62
2
12,000
6.20
2,60
70
d
3
18,000
6.16
18a
6Z
6113
p
27113?
k
6/13 i
00291131
4
24,000
4.41
4A1
w
1
4
24,000
4.41
4,41
6.1
04130113
f
S
TOTAL
1
16,76
t
6
4&,
9:91
23
136,
26.
AVG. €
2
11,250
4.60
0,76
62
2
12
4 96
0.45
7,0
3
16 333
4.64
121
6,6

Veolla Rater North America a t(r1g Services
REGIONAL IONMdAbL COMPOST FACILITY mm KORY, NC
Conovard9 th%'rot 1 ,= OW 203
page 1
810 LID RIZZMNG
CONOVEIR-MMT14EAST
CONOVER 1 NONMN
TOTAL N
'DATE
TRUCK
VOLUME
3
MA!
pM
TRtJ 10
tt01LU#415
601LI
3
pH
I
TRUdVOL
71�15
9 LIDS]6
H
N.gallonsa
OT
.0
PIc.
#Isar
T #
OT
#�#
gallons
T6
##
,u
05101113
€
05102./131
1
61000
402
1.01
6.0
#
12.OW
5,14
2.57
6.9
�
3
16,000
4,77
3,56
6:6
061031131
a
9
05105113
061
3,
16,
4.14
3.11
5,6
3
16,000
4,14
3,11
so
0711305I
r
6J131
09113 #
2
12,000
4.19
2.10
6.1
1 2
12,000
&05
2,53
7.0
4
24,000
4,62
4,62
6.6
101131
0&11113g
05//21138
05113113�
2
12,000
427
2.14
6,0
2
12,000
*27
2.14
6 0
05t14113�
05115/1311
05116/13�
1
6,000
4
1.12
6.0
2
12,000
5B11
2.61
6,9
1
3
M000
5.24
3,93
6.5
051171131
05116113
1911
201113#
3
18,000
4.14
3,11
6.1
1
3
18„000
414
3,11
9,1
C&211131
#
2113-
3113s
1
6,000
4.10
1,03
GA2
1200
5,04
2,52
7.0
�
3
16,000
4� r"'3
3.55
6,9
Rtl 3
3 i
5105127113,1
#
05126/131
05128113,
3
16,000
3.85
2,69
6.2
�
�
3,
18,000
3.55
2,89
6.2
05129/13
05130/131
2
12,000
4,95
248
71
2
12004,96
2.4
7.1
1 /13'
TOMAL 1
16
96,000
16,49
10
60OO�t
12.91
26
1�,000
211,40
AVQ,
2
12 ow
4,15
015
6.1
1 2
12
5160159
7,0
1
3
17333
4$2
1.34
6.5

Veolla Water NoM America Operating Services
RSA AL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, N
Concww Aftnthly rotefe'- June 2013
page'
SJOSOLIDS RECEIVING
CONOVER • NORTHEAST
CONOVER d N N
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE
TRUCK
VOLIJ
CJLtC�S
A83
TRLI I�
UME
SOLI
MASS
-PH
TRtd 1
�/ F
8C1LE
pH
flu
48 ,,
t3T
a
e1la�as
8
]
.0
N
T
OT
S u
/1t13 6
06*2/13 6
w
3/1i
12,0007
145
8,32
l2low
3178
1.89
8.3
0"4/13?
s
13?
13'
1
6,000
4.31
1,08
SA 1
2
12,000
4.88
2.33
7.1
3
IS,000
4.54
3.41
7.
7/13
}.
a
/ 13..'
06M/13'
10/131
1
6,000
4.99
1,17
4,4
1
6,000
4.99
117
6
/11/13 z
112/13
48/13/13
2
12,000
467
2.34
7.2
2
12jO00
4.67
2.34
71
/14/13
18/131
t /17113
2
12,000
4.53
227
2
12,000
4,53
2.27
8.8
18/13
19113
tt1133
2
12,000
4,83
2.42
72 x
2,
12,000
4.83
2.42
7
1 /13
2113
3113�
I
OSQ4/13
4
6,000
4.38
1,09
91
2
12,000
4.49
2.23
7 3 ;
3
48,000
4,42
3,32
72
8/13
E
13
x
I
0&27/13 £
06428/13
9/13
n
06=113�
s
TOTAL
2
42,
7AS
8
48,000
9,e31
i8
i9,77
A4 1
1M
8
4.32
1 49
6.5
i 2
4.66
2,33
7,2 1
2
12,857
4.48
Z40
8,9

Veoffa Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, NC,
Conover Monthly totals -July 2013
page
CONOVER - NORTHEAST
CONOVER I NEWTON
I
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE- '
_fkUC!;K
VOLUME
E I
SOLIDS it
MASS I
pH_ -1
TRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
MASS
04----
No,
1-97OLI—OS
ions
411S
% TS
%
DT
s,u
No,
flons_ I
DT
slu
07/01/131
1
6,000
4,49
1,12
2
12,=
4,78
139
7,3
1 3
m000
4-,ft
3,52
7.2
07102/13
07/03/13
07/"13
07M/1 3
07/W13
07107113
07108113
07AM13
07/10113�
07/11/131
1
6,000
5,17
1,29
71
1 1
8,000
&17
1.20
73
07/12113
07/13/13
071141131
0711&13
18,000
120
2,40
7A
3
18,000
120
2,40
7,1
07/16/13�
07/17113]
071101131
3
18,000
4.93
370
7.2
3
18,000
4.93
310
7,2
07/191131
07tZ0113
1
=21113
071221131
1
8*000
3.22
0.81
75
1
6,000
3,22
041
7S
=23)131
07/24/13
07125113E
2
12,000
4,71
216
7,2
2
12,000
4,71
136
7.2
07126ti 3
07/27113
07128/13
07r2W13
2
12
4,72
2,36
72
j 2
12,000
412
2,36
7.2
07130113
07/31M3
fOTA L
5
30,000
*33
10
50'000
1210
15
W'000
1644
AVG
2
100M
3,64
1,44
72
2
12000
4h0
2.42
7"2
4 2
12 67
4,38
2,35
7,3

Veolla Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL OMPOST FA IL r - HICKORY, NC
Conover nthly'rofols- al2113
Pago
RIOSOUDS RECEIVING
ONt3 - NORTHEAST
CONOV51RINEWON
TOTAL CONOVIM
AT
TRUCK
VOLUME
lU8
la
T U
V�iLUNI
-
1u1A65
TRUCK
tft2L 1
LI
PH
No3
Ilo
i
13T
$:L
h1 .
tl r� '
T
No,
p n
u
11131
2
12,000
4,05
2,03
6,8
2
12,000
4,06
2,03
6.6
F Ij
`
OeVO31131
1 to
;
08MM31
2
12,000
418
2,14
68
2
12,1100
4,28
2,14
6.6
1131
OS07/131
8113g
2
12,000
3
1.9
8:6
=,
2
12,ODO
3S6
1.65
6.6
06109113
g
08111/13b
&
112113
3
18,000
4,15
3,11
616
3
18,000
4,15
311
6.6
08113/13 �
08114113
c
66115113
3
18, 0
., 4
4..31
7.3
3
18,000
5,74
4.31
7.3
6f1ry
17113
08/181139
68f18113i
08/2011
((
0&21/131
e2113
113
4113#;
6J13 1
3
18,000
4,483.36
61
3
18,000
4,48
3.36
8.1
27113;
05Q8113
6113s
1
6,
AM1,17
6.6
� 1
6,
7.4
1,76
7,3
2
12,
5.81
2.
7.1
0/131
3
18,000
4.27
3,21
SA
2
12,000
5
2,84
7,3
5
30,000
4,83
6,04
TO
138F31113 �
#
TOTAL G
16
—16-07
6
3e,000
8.93
13200
2501,
AVG.
2
13 714
4,26
2.42
6:6
2
12
6.18
1987,3
3
16500
4,67
3,24
6.6

Veofia Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, NC
Conolkwh0bothly Totafs - S"mbor 20f 3
Pago I
810SOLIDS Neds—IM-6—
CONOVER - NORTHEAST
CONOVER I NEWTON
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE
TRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
MA
tRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
MASS
-OH-
Tf;
SOLIDS
MASS
pH
NO.
oations
% TS
0
Np.
Hone
TS
C)T
slu
I
% TS
DT
Cu
09107J1 31
09/03/13
09/04113
09M/13t
2
12,000
4,33
217
9.8 1
2
12,ODO
6,73
3.37
7,3
4
24;DW
6.63
5,53
71
00IM131
09/mI31
09I91131
09/101131
2
12,000
4,34
2.17
6,9
2
12,000
3,26
1,63
7,5
4
24c00
180
180
7,3
091111131
09112/13
1
6,000
4,31
1.08
6,8
2
12,000
3,14
1.57
7A
3
46,0DO
3,53
2.65
7,3
09113113
09114/131
09/16/13
09/16/13t
09/171131
3
18,000
4,16
312
6.9
3
48j000
4�16
3,12
6,9
owl 8/13
09119/13
00/20/13
2
12,000
2,54
127
7B
2
12,0W
2,54
1,27
7.6
OW21113
09/22113
09/23113
3
18,000
3,42
2Z7
6,8
3
16,000
142
Z57
9.8
09/24113
OW&I3
OW2$113
2
12,000
3.81
1,91
6,7
2
12,000
2.22
1'11
TS
4
24,000
3,02
3,02
7.3
OW27/13
09428/13
09/29113
49 113j
3
18,000
3,82
2.87
9.9 f
3
IS,=
3,82
2,87
6,6
TOTAL
As
W000
15,88
i
1
393
AVG.
2
13,714
4.03
0.79
6Sa
12 00
,0
0.45
7,5
3,
;SW
173
124
�71

Veolla VAAsr Forth America Operating Services
REGIONAL ST FACILITY - HICKORY, NO
Coxmw Nl ?+Male - October 2013
page
810 VING
N m NORTHEAST
CONOVERINEWTON
T T L ' R
Ci TE
K
V LUME
SOLID
I�
i
VOLUM
SOLIDS
M 9
p
TRUCK
UI�E
S LICiSMASS
PH
[Ions
% TS
ITT
Ilt
�6 TS
C1T
,ra
No,
land
T
T
�.
07101113
B
7/02/13
07/03/13s
2
14000
4,00
2,00
4D
2
12,000
2,93
1,47
7,2
4
24,000
3.47
3,47
6,0
7 /1 1
7/05113
07 13-
7107113;
3
18,000
3.89
2.92
6.5
3
18,000
3,89
2.92
615
07 13..
$
07/09/
7111 t13
1
6,
3,99
1 DO
8.5 �
�
1
6,000
3,99
1.
6,6
7111113
07112/131
7113/13'01//14/131
I
2
1
3,33
1.65
6,8
1
8,
4.95
1.24
72
3
18, 000
3.85
2,89
6.9
197t15J13
I
37116�'13
;
071171131
1
6,000
3,42
0.86
6.32
12,000
4.36
2.18
7.2
3
18,000
4,05
344
7.1
7118113
€
a
07/19113�
07/2 113
�
g
07/21113
2
12,000
3.33
1.67
6.4
12,000
3,33
1,67
6.4
7/22113
7/23"13
Q7124113
3
18,000
3,49
2:.62
72
3
18,000
3,49
2.62
7.2
07/2 115,
07/26/131
=28113,
2
12,000
3,98
1 SO
6,4
2
12,000
3.98
1.99
6.4
07129113
7 113
�2
�
07/31113=
12
211
1,06
7.4
2
12
2.11
1.06-
7.4
TOTAL
13
78,000
12,08
10
8 56
138,000
20,65
A ,
2
11143
370
1,73
6
2
3
15
157
129
6,8

'Veolia Water North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, NC
Conovor Monthly Total% - Novonber M3
#DFV/01
#DIV/01
CONOVER - NORTHEIASTi
CONO''VER I NEWTON
TOTAL CONO VER
K
VOLUIME-813LI
A88
p I
TR1 lO1C
I I
I I B
80 I
TRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
MASS
pH
No.
gallons
TS
DT
S,u
11101/131
IIM2113�
11103113,,'
1110*13�1
2
12,000
3,98
1.90
'6.5
s2
12,000
3,98
1,99
6.5
1110&131
111OW31
11/07/131
r 2
12,000
4,75
2,38
75
1 2
12,000
4,75
2,38
7.5
11M&13-"
111OW131
1111W1311
11111/131
1
6,000
148
0,87
6A
1
8,000
3,46
0,$7
6:
11)12/131
11113/131
111141131
2
12,000
2.80
1.0
7-S
2
12,OW
2A0
1,40
7,5
111151131
11116/131
11/17/131
W18/131
1
6,000
156
0,89
SA
1
6,000
3,56
0189
6.
11119/131
111211131g
2
1
12,000
6,000
2.64
4DO
132
102
73
713
2
12,000
2,64
4.08
1,32
7.3
7.3
11122113
11123113
1
6,000
1.02
11124/13
1
ilas/13
2
12,000
3.69
1 As
6A
1
6,000
243
0.66
7A
3
18,000
3,34
2$0
7,0
11126(13
11/271131
1112&131
111291131
11130113'
TOTAL
36,000
5,59
8
481000
12,37'''_'
JS
L.Aw-
2
3,38
1,36
T..
2
10
3,68
1.66
7o

Veolla Water North America rate ` services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILM - HICKORY, NC
Conovar Monthly Totals- br 2013
Ram 1
9f6tOU N
ON - NORTHEAST
CONOVERINEWTON
TOTAL CONKIVIEFI
OAT,E
T,RUC
SOL
�01.06
MOSS
H
Nis:
II+�
T
C4T.0
4Irr N LIT
N
Iar
I3T`
121C11l13
�
12102113
3
18,000
3,7
2,82
&3
3
16,
3.
2-82
8.3
1 3/13'
12 13�
1210&131
2
12,000
SA4
2,57
6.2
� 12,000 2M 1:27
73
�
24,000
184
3,84
7.1
12 13
IV07113
1218113
12 13
4
24,000
4D9
4,09
6.1
a 4
24,
*09
6.1
12110113
12111113
12112/13
2
12,0w
4.24
2.12
61
3 18,000 4 310
6.8
1 6
30,E
4,65
8,62
6.
1211311 �
�
12114113
12l1a113
12/16113,
"
12,000
4,11
Z06
6.2
2
12,000
4,11
2.06
8.2
12117113
12118113
121181131
1
6,000
3.83
0,96
6.2
2 18,000 5ol 3,76
6,7
4
24,000
412
412
6.6
1212113
12/21113
12122113�
12/23113,
1 ,
4,02
3. 2
6,2
3
18,000
-
3.4 2
.2'
12124113
12f25113;
1212&13
12/27113I
C
12/28113
1212 113�
;
12 13
4
2„
4.32
4.32
.2„
4,
4.
4.32
6.2
12/31113
T TANS
21
126030
21. 7
8.73
26
174,4136
AVG.
3
15,750
4.19
1100
6,2
3 16, 4.46 0A0
6,9
4
21,7
4.1's
1.
6.

V"la stater North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, N
Conover Writhly TaW - January 2014
page1
CONOVER - NORTHEAST
CONOVERINEWTON
-TOTAL CONOVER
DATE
TFR
VOLUME-
SOLIDS,MASS
pR--j
TRUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
M 9
pH
TR RC
54L1R 5"
pH
[+srt
YS
p1
am
lons
T
1
Cu
01€01114'
01102/141
1
6,000
4,31
1.08
6.2
2
12,000
5,89
2,96
7,1
3
18,0005,36
4,03
619
01103t14
131 1
p,
01105114
01106114
3
18,000
3.61
2.71'
6,2
2
184000
3.61
2.71
62
0110711
j
1/0&14
11091141
2
12,000
5A8
2.74
7.1
2
12,000
5.45
2,74
7,1
01110/14
01/1111 ;
,
OV12114
k
011131141
1
6,000
3.27
6.52
S,4 I
€ 1
S
3,27
Q.52
6A
01/141141
5
30,000
371
4.64
6.2
s 5
30,000
3.71
4,64
6.2
011151141
01/16/141
2
12,000
4,11
2,06
6�2
2
12,000
5W
254
7.1
� 4
24,000
4,59
4,59
6.9
011171141
0111118 1g 4
R
01119i
O1r21'R114 }
a
I
01121/14
0/122114
01123114
1
6,
4.25
1.56
611 i
12,
6,55
3.25
7.5
3
1 „
5,75
4,34
7s1
p
1R1124114
0pq111 114
01 14€
¢
01127114€
4
24,W0
4,24
4,24
6.2 r
; 4
24,0W
4.24
4.24
6.2
Q7125114
01129114
01 t30fl4s
01131114
I
1
6
5,93
1:4S
7,2
1
S
5.93
1,48
72
T[RTAL I
T
1112„
16.61
9
54,000
12,99
26
156low
29A0
2
i4571
3.93
2r37
Set
2
1
Sr 5
2r6t5
7.2
17,
4.66
1.41
67

Vaoffa Water North America Operab"Services
REGIONAL COMPOSTFACILITY - HICKORY, NO
Conovor Monthly Totals 2014
page
I
CONOVER - OMTHEAST
CONOVER I NEVVIM
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE I
TRUCK
VOLk
I
No.
wt(
02101114i
02102114'
02/031141
3
18,000
4.11
&08
62
3
18,000
4,11
3.08
6,2
02104114!
u/Mot
02106M 4
2
14000
5,24
2S,2
74 g
2
12,000
524
2A2
7.4
02/07114
02/08n4i
021091141
02110/141
3
18,000
436
327
62
3
18,000
4.36
127
62
02)111141
021131141
02114/141
2
1200
4AI
2,21
611
2
12,000
4,41
Z21
6.1
02/1$1141
211&141
L12117114
3
18,ODO
3.79
184
6'1
3
18,000
379
2.84
SA
0211 V 4
02/1 V1 4
02120114
02121114
4
24,000
6,29
e.30
6 9
4
24,000
6.29
sic
6.9
02122114
02123114
02/24114
3
18,000
423
3.16
&1
3
18,000
4.23
3-10
$A
02125114
021261141
02/271141
1
6,000
4,02
1.01
6.1
3
18,000
5,23
3S3
7,0
4
24,000
4.93
4M
619
021281141
TOTAL a
15
9t7,9
15.511
9
54,
12.84
AM
2
15,000
41.15
2A0
6.1
2
16 000
5,50
428
71
6
16
4V
3L55
6,5

Veolla Water Nodh AmericaOperating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - HICKORY, N '
page
SOLIDS Rwomko
NO R - NORTHEAST
CONOVERINEWTONR
DATE
TRU G6
LU 1E
pH
No
llons
No,
DT
S.
01114 x
031021141
03103114
03141141
3
18,000
4,16
3.14
6.1
3
1
4.18
3,14
6.1
O&MI41
031 114 ;
2
12,000
4.21
2.11
6 2
2
lZ000
6,14
3.07
71
� 4
5,18
5,18
6.8
OW07114 y
0310&141
a
03MI14i
;
03/11011/4
3
18,
4,12'
3,09
6.1
�
3
1
,12
3,09
6.1
3 @1114y
Y
031121141
03113114 x
2
12,000
4,12
2,06
6.2
2
12,WO
5,80
190
7 0
4
24
4.96
4.96
6.8
03114114k
i
03/16/14
031161141
K
17/141
3
18,000
4,22
3,17
6.2
3
15AW
4,22
317
6,2
03118114,,
03119114
r
0 01141�
2
12,000
4.15
2,08
6.2
2
JZQ0D
5,97
2.99
7.0
1 4
24M
5.06
5,06
6.
21114
6
03/2127J14
03123114
3..
18,
4,30
3.23
6,2
}t
� 3
1
4,30
3,23
6.2
p24/141
0312&141
{
03/2&141
03/271141
1
6,000
3,82
0,96
6.2
3
18,GDO
6.74
5,06
6.9
4
24
6.01
8.01
6.8
03128/14
I,
0,V29/14
s
03 PwA n.
0 11141
2
12
3.81
1,91
6.2
l 2
1 ZWO
3,81
1.91
6,
TOTAL g
21
126,000
21,3
9
54jD00
14,02
1 30
18DOW
A
2
14w
4.10
2.41
6.
2
13
6,16
3 51
7,0
' 3
2
4,65
3,97
6.4

Vaotta Meter North America Operating Services
REGIONAL COMPOST ACILIT Y W HICKORY, NC
Conovor Monthly Totals 4 rd12014
BfOSOLIOS RECEIVING
page
CONOVER - NORTHEAST
coN R I WR
TOTAL CONOVER
DATE
LUCK
VOLUME
SOLIDS
TRUCK LPLUME SOLIDS MASS
pal
TRUCK
VOLUME
I SOLIDS I
MASS
MOH
a0 s
% TS
M3T
a. Il n S 2L
s.0
gollons4%
TS
M
u
1d1
s
s
2114 f
3114
1
6,000
3.86
OW
&2
2_ 12,000 5,04 2.52
S S
18,000
4AS
3.45
5:
4114
1
14;'
wwuTf14E
3
18,000
3.83
2,95
629
3
18,000
3,93
2,95
5.2
8114,
s
111114
1
6,000
537
1,34
€ 2 12,000 7.133 3.52
68
3,
18,ODO
S.A8
4,66
6�7
11114
04YI
13114
14111A ➢'
15114
181}14 r
171141
3
1,5,000
4,40
3.310
}
3,
18,000
4,40
3,30
6O
041181141,
10114§
11114
1114
3
18,000
4.15
311
6LO
1 6, 5,02 1.26
S S
4
24,000
4.37
4,37
6,5
2114.
;.
r
3114"
4f14
1
6,000
4.18
1,ii5
&1
3 18P00 4,52 3.39
7.
5
4
24,000
4,44
4,44
6,9
5,114
OV271W
OW28/14
3
18,000
4,31
3,24
6LO
3
18,
4.31
3,24
Co
J143
...
M
M14 r
3
,
s
TOT
15
15,E
8 48, 1,51
23
138,
5.55
ffl^01
2
12u857
4.31
2211
S 1
1 2 12 5,40 2.57
8.8
"3
18,714
4,55
3,81
5.4

.ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Part B - AnnuaIComQjLnce Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes 0 No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain go'crective,actian,_
taken,
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the perraitted sites.
2) Sod pH was adjusted as specified ire the permit and time Ras applied (if needed) to achieve a soil PH of at least 6,0 or the
limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of
laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP anal, ysis (if required) was performed and dim (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during they as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T.11 05(a) or the PollutantLoading:
Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) AH general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 1. 5A NCAC 02T, I I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFly Part 503
regulated fheilities),
9) AJ1 operations and maintenance requirements in the die it were corophedmath or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality,
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative coverwas maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as specified
in the permit,
13) Aft bu&r at speeffied on the: permit wore maimainixf during each application ot residuals.
'1111 1A
Signature of Preparcr* ate Signature of Land Applies Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Perm ittee and Preparer)
Prey is defined in, 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T 1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)
yv

ANNVAL !AND APPLICATION CMMCAnONFORM
INFO
r*T#UAM 6:1 102.Z11" Ell
Laa
• Total number of application fields in pennit.
• Total number of fields land application occurred during the year.
NR 2012
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites.
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the year.
Fart —H
Facility was compliant during calendar year 200— with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to
items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality
YES _- NO. rF NO, PLEASE PROVIDE A wRn-MN DESCRIMON WHY THE FAcimy WAS NOT COMPLLANT, THE
DAM, AND EXPLA114 CORRZ-CITVE ACI1ON TAKEN.
Signature of-Preparer Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (it different from Permittee and Preparer)
Note- Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 50,3.9(r)
fi
kA N, Hf I 1 .1 DEM FORM CF (112002)
`,

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#- WQ0004391 County: Catawba Year:
Facility Name has shown on permit): City of Conover
'41:010
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites,
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied if needed) to achic-,te a soil pH of at least 6.0 or the
limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of
laboratory results are attached,
4) Annual TCLP analysis if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the ym as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15 A, NCAC 02T , I 105(a) or the Pollutant Loading
Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the 1,and Application Permitwere complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T. I I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
kgtt C - —Certificatiow. "I ccr*, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that the are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
r
Michael Fox Wastewater Supervisor-
S4 W Of Dare
a Title type or Pennittee
PermitteCe �Namme and Title e or nt
type
2 5
Tij;;-t—ae of preparer' at6 S1 of Land Applier Date
(if different from Pennittee) at from Pennittee, and Preparer)
Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 5(13.9 (r) and I �A NCAC 02T 11'02 Q-6) DEN R FORM ACF (1212006)

�^ �w pf
�`. a+'� � „apt ��� �"- t..; �"'"�P � ., �;� +. ���V d` �` �`�� ro�'��,.�`^p� �.
' r, a g
y�. t,
x ��
:�d.

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
.W4 M
Q Permit#: WQ0004381 County: Catawba Year: 2009
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Cliff Of Conovtx -
Land Application Operator: Michael Fox Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendargar?
E3 Yes M No - If No, skip Part A, and Part 8 and proceed to Part C. Also, If rest
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were nni 7
a
Part 8 - Annual Contiriance Stateownt.
Michael Fox Wastewater Supervisor --1112111-D-
Pennittee Name and Title (rype or print) Signature a Pennince igre
Signature of 'Prep ear* Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if diffelvat fican pennittee) (if dfferent from Pennatee and Prepaver)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T, 1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (1212006)

TY OFCONOVER
P O "�`
IN
r7.
NC28613-0549
February 19, 2008
DENR/DWQ/ Water Quality Section
Nan -Discharge compliance Unit
117 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 7 -1 17
Dear Sara:
Enclosed for your review are three copies of the Annual
Land. Application Certification Form for
the City of Conover's
wastewater treatment plant. The City of
Conover produced 189.58'
tons of residuals. These residuals were
treated at our regional
composting facility (Permit Number WQ000456,3). Nuns of the City
of ono er'a residuals were land applied
in 2007.
If you have any questions, comments,
or need any further
information you may call me at () 465-2279.
:sincerely,
Michael Fox
Wastewater Treatment Supervisor
RECEIVED
FEB 2 2 2008
WATEh,iUAUTY SECTION
wr ormati n Processing Unit

PP-PP"F- - ,

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATIOINCERTMCATION F04LM
jj-County, Year
5ow7n on perriiitl}11
razor phone
residuals allowed b thDUALS WERE
AND P
NOif NO. SKIP PART I, aiai
g the uatendar
a DAPPLIED,PL fiCC�
-art
• Total number of application fields; in permit.
• Total number of fields land application occurred during the year.
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites. � w
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the ye
mart v iv,
Facility was compliant during calendar year 00 with all conditions o the land application permit (including M&FIlitnited to
items t- 2 below) issued by the Division of `water Quality
YES _, NO. IF No. PLEASE PROVIDE A wRn-rEN DESCRIPT10N, WHY -THE FActury WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE
EATES, AND .I: 3 tad CORPEECTTIVE A N Tt.KEN-
PAS
Si&uu re of Preparer bete
Signature cif Pe itte t?at
' )1,5
Permittet and eparer
Note: Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part (r) MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE M FORM CF (U2002).
SECTION

W"0438 I - Conover additiorml Info
Subject: WQ#04381- Conover additional Inho
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:27:34 -0400
From: Jaya Joshi <jaya.Joshi(i cmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Mike Fox --Conover <"kefCa)6.conover.ncu-.-,-
CC: Ellen Huffman AURAW14=11nanaLnen, rnike.rmck4 pcmait.net
Mr . Fox:
This is Joshi from Non Discharge Permitting Unit of DWO. I am the
primary reviewer on this permit. You may have received the following
request for additional information from Ms. Ellen Huffamn of MRCS. I
ahve also received a request for additional info from Mr. Mike Ranck of
Gw section, please review both these requests and send *four* conies of
requested data to my attention at the address at the bottom of this
message. Please clal as if you ahve questions:
CW Request:
1. A site specific map with topographic contours (contour interval
should not exceed 10 ft or 255 of total site relief, whichever is less),
showing all facility -related structures withing the property boundary
and the location of all wells, springs, lakes, ponds, or other surface
drainage features withing 500 feet of the waste treatment disposal
site (s). Wells should be labeled as to their primary usage (drinking
water, process water, monitoring, ets.). The map should also delineate
steep slopes and buffer areas.
2. Any soil evaluation far application site, including the soil
profiel/brongs log made to the site, to verify the accuracy of SCS soil
map regarding the presence or absence of seasonal high water table or
bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residula
application.
Ellen Huffman wrote:
>Hello Mike,
>Here is a list of things T need to help expedite your emergency LA
>permit renewal WQ0004381.
>I- Clarification that there are only 2 fields known as Sipes Field 1
land Sipes field 2a
>2- Explain that the buffers for land app. follow the tree line. Identify
>the map as a butter map.
>3- Clarify the net acreage for each field.
>4- Clarify the closure of the wwtp NC 0024279 (does it have a name?) and
>who is responsible for the sludge removal and what will be done with
>tbe sludqe
>5- Please supple a field location (vicinityl map.
>1 think that is everything I need for now.
'Thanks,
>Ellen
JX. Joshi
North Carolina Division of Water Ouality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 of 2
10/22/2003 9.47 AM

l$1✓
CITY OF CONOVER
11-1 jgj-jw-j-WjNNPPNNjjjg
P.O. BOX 549
CONOVER, NC 28613-0549
November 10, 2003
COwns
19.1C WORKS DEPARTMENT'
OV 3 M3 Phone [phone]
MISQUALPSEMON
Ms. Ellen Huffman
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Ms. Huffman:
Enclosed are maps with compliance boundaries marked
for the two fields at the Sipes Orchard location. i Wish
to divide the property into two fields.
The Northern field, on the opposite side of th.E,, road
irom the main school complex, is field 1. The southern
field behind the school c6mplex is field 2.
Field I contains approximately 85 acres total with
about 70 usable after buffer,zones. The northwest section
of site'! is buffered, on the may, 400 feet from structures
of dwelling. The southwest section of field is a130
buffered 400 from dwellings. The west boundary is buffered
50 from public right of way. The southe a3tern boundary is
buffered 100 feet from the streams and 400 feet from
dwellings. On the southeastern edge of the field there are
some abandoned structures that we buffered away from. On
the northeastern part of field 1 there is a nati-ira], wooded
buffer.
The southern field behind the school complex is field 2.
Field 2 has approximately 65 total acres with about 60
after buffer zones. The field is mostly naturally buffered
by woods. There is a 100 foot buffer on the eastern
boundary for property lines. There is 100 foot, buffer on
the western side for a stream.
The City of Conover is scheduled to eliminate the
Southeast Wastewater Treatment Plant NCO024219 around April
200The flow will be sent to the City of Newton. In the
municipal contract, the Cit-y of Conover agrees to haul a
volume of sludge from the City of Newton's facility equal
to Conover's solids loading contribution. Because Conover's
wastewater will mix with Newton's wastewater prior to
entering.Newton's plant the sludge will be a combination of
Newton and Conover. We intend to compost the material but
in an emergency situation we may have to make arrangements

Mike Fox
From: Jaya Jo hi Uay ,(oshi ncmail.net
Seats Wednesday, October 22, 2303 9:28 AM
To: Mike Fox
c: Ellen Hufifmanr mike, ranck@ncmaiLnet
Subject: WQ0004381- Conover additional Info
r. Fox:
This is J. R. Joshi from Non Discharge Permitting Unit of DWQ. I am the primary reviewer on this
permit. You may have received the following request for additional information from Ms. Ellen
Huffamn of MRO, I ahve also received a request for additional info from Mr, Mike Renck of Cv
Section. Please review both these requests and send fear coipes of requested data to my
attention at the address at the bottom of this message. 'Please clal me if you ahve questions:
C request.
1. A site specific map with topographic contours. (contour interval should not exceed 10 ft or 2 %
of total site relief, whicheveris less), showing all facility --related' structures withing the property
boundary and the location of all wells, springs, lees, ponds, or rather surface drainage features
withing 500 feet of the waste treatment/ disposal site(s)Wells should be labeled as to their
primary usage (drinking water, process water, monitoring, ets,). The map should also delineate
steep dopes and buffer areas.
. Any soil evaluation to application site, including the soil profiel(brongs log ,made to the site, to
verify the accuracy of SCSsoil map regarding the presence or absence of seasonal high water
table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residula application,
Ellen Huffman wrote;
Hello Mike,,
Here is a list of things I need to help expedite your emergency L
permit renewal vV4 000 381
1- Clarification that there are only 2 fields known as Sipes Field 1
and Sipes field 2.
2- Explain that the buffers for land app, follow the tree line. Identify
the map as a buffer map.
- Clarify the net acreage for each field:
- Clarify the closure of the wwtp IBC 0024279 (does it have a name?) and
who is responsible for the sludge removal and what will be done with
the sludge.
- Please supple a field location (vicinity) map:
I think that is everything l need for now.
Thanks,
Ellen
J,P. Josh(
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC y gg-161
Phone: [phone] e t 363
Fax: (919) 71 - 048 Email: raya.iosiai�n n�ail.net

9

NORTH CAROLINA
CATAWBA COUNTY
NEWTON AND CONOVER AGREEMENT
RE: CLARK CREEK SEWER
This agreement entered into 2003 by the cities of Newton
and Conover, both municipal corporations of Catawba County, North Carolina,
WITNESSETH:
Whereas, Newton owns and operates its Clark Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
(Facility) which has a current capacity of 5 million gallons per day (MGD) and is capable
of being permitted to a capacity of 7.5 MGD after obtaining an "authorization to
construct"' from the state and completing minor improvements to the Facility; and
Whereas, Conover owns and operates its Southeast to Water Treatment Plant
(SEWWTP) that has a current capacity of 0.6 MGD and must complete significant
modifications as a result of the proposed construction of NC Highway 16 realignment;
and
Whereas, the parties have existing agreements for treating wastewater from Conover at
the Facility, with Conover having a current capacity of 0.479 MGD; and
Whereas, the parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby they will "partner" in the
use, operation, and maintenance of the Facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereof, it is agreed as
follows:
2.
Fkrp—o—se. The parties agree to "partner" in the facility by expanding
Conover's share of the treatment capacity at the Facility from 0.479 MGD to
1. MGD, provide for certain improvements to theNewton sewer collection
system, provide for management and costs of operation, maintenance, and
capital improvements, and certain other, matters provided for herein.
Definitions. The words defined in this paragraph shall have the meanings
indicated when used in this Agreement:
A. "'WWTP" or "Facility" means Newton's existing Clark Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
& "SEWWTP" means Conover's existing Southeast Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
C, "Lead Agent"means Newton.
Page 1 of 12

FINAL DRAFT
March o2003
a) A l -inch force main to be constructed Newton's Burris Road Pump
Station to Mt. Olive Church Road, with an estimated cost to Conover of
t? i1, being Project #1 per Exhibit Aa
) A 1 -inch relief gravity sower line to be constructed ftorn the Burris Road
Pump Station approximately 2,000 feet upstream to d connection point
with the City of Conover at an estimated cost to Conover of $103,360,being
Project #2per Exhibit A.
fi. Future plant expansions may be constructedy
mutual agreement of the parties with the costs thereof to be paid based on the
amount of additional capacity each shall receive from the expansion.
7. Cost of QDeration and Maintenance. Until an adjustment is required due to future
Facility expansion as provided for in liaragraph 6, Newton shall pay 6% of the
costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the Facility and Conover
shall pay 14% of tile cosh associated with the operation and maintenance of the
Facility., For the purposes of this contract the operation ainten ce costs
shall not include the coasts of sludge disposal. Conover will be responsible for the
cost to remove, treat and dispose of its sludge contribution. onover's sludge
contribution will be calculated monthly based on the average flow and TSS
concentration from all points of connection to the City of Newton ontfalls.
Conover will responsible for Providing two metering sites 1+�ca t d at the
connection chats of the tfvo,,,,sygent s. A installation, the t+ rs will be
owned � ,errata and maintained ov o meters will be calibrated in
accordance with manufacture's recommendations. Newton will not include the
cost of sludge removal, treatment and disposal when calculating the portion of the
facility operation and maintenance to char to Conover. It is anticipated that
'based on each p y's wastewater contribution that generally the sludge to be
removed, treated and disposed of by Newton will be field applied and the sludge
to be removed, treated and disposed of by Conover will be taken to the Sludge'
Compost facility,
Page 3 oft

Ov eo
A
0
Map air 4,q le
Iva IAV, 300-t
t

I

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL LEGEND
Tte first ".Lji'„.toi .letter
is The mirial one Of the Soil name, A second capital letter, 8,
D, , , :ar Fse-ow'
the slope. Symbols without ca slope letter are those of nearly level soals�
A F,noi number, 2 .,r a Bra a syrrcct shows that the Soil is eroded of severely eroded,
SYMBOL L
NAM
1
AF
Altavista line sandy loam, clayey variant
As
Aapling sandy ioism,:.2 to 6 percent slopes
AsC-4
Apphn:a sandy" loom, d to 10 percent slopes, eroded
As22
Apo,rnq sanely loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
r
Buncombe [comy sand''
Cm82
l..eciI sandy 1cohn, 2'to 6 percent slopes, eroded
i-M 2
Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
_mD2
ti.ec;l Sandy Imam, 10 to 15 percent sittaes, eroded
CnB2
Cecil c§ray loom, 2 to to percent slopes, erode
C n-2
Cecil cloy loom, ra to 10 percent slopes, eroded
C_nE 3
Cecil cloy loom, 10 To 25 percent slopes, severely eroded
L,w
'1;;eeacla loom
._
Congaree con-oplex
rn Ei
Cracow I'me sandy Iorsrt, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Gv
k.a€ul$.ieri (ar"d
Hy82
Hiwassee loom, 2 to 6 percent slopes:„. eroded:
Ens'-.2 l
Hiwrassee loom, 6 to 10 pets ir t slopes, eroded
F sC2
t ocussee loarn, W to 15 percent slopes, eroded
HsE
H—cissee =norm, €7 to 25 percent slopes
HwEi"I
Hvwassee clay i;aam„ 2 to Q percent slopes, eroded
rE a_.1
Hiwacica'y' loom"�tgg 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
Lc
'�ssee
;.�,e4'eled oytey iE'i..
96 2
Nkod son gravelly sandy lrecta, 2 to & percent stapes, eroded
r2
"Aad'son grovPHT, sandy, lcaart, b to 10 percent slopes, strodeel
a ..
dtrson gro2dily son,,j w Ooa r, 10 to 25 peteerhl slopes, eroded
Poi=
Pracolet grovelly sandy loom, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Pc'3
Poculet proveky Fine; sandy loom, 2 to percent slopes:
PCP
P°acclet ,grovetly lire sandy laeana, d to 10 µseccent slopes
PeC
Par.clea soils. 10 to 25 percent slopes
,ad
WLhaadkee i'me sandy : loom= .:..
ATkd L
ey'a lkes loom, 02 to 25 percent slopes
"N'o
Nnrsh.ane Fine sandy loam

..yam � � a y:� :� .<� . � � � d < .. � : > . :, � � , � �
: . » ?<«.� � «: ,: � : « » : 2<� � � < �.� � � . ® � \� :� � � � :x : y.

Site Investigation
City of Conover, NC.
A. R. Rubin, Professor and Extension Specialist Scott Frederick, CPSS
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Greenvest, Inc.
'storieally the City of Conover has had several fields permitted to receive the digested
biosolid materials generated within the treatment facilities serving th, e Town. The fields have
not received biosolid materials for several years because of the interlocal agreement to
develop and support the regional biosolids compost facility in Fbekory. Nonetheless, less, the City
of Conover desires to maintain the permit as an active alto Live should they ever require
lead application activity to manage the biosolid materials. Should the fields be required, the
City is fully cognizant iant that there will be requirements to stabilize the materials and assure
adequate vector attraction reduction is achieved prior to any land application.
P
The purpose of the brief report which follows is to describe the conditions encountered on the
Sipes Orchard Site and to describe the results of the soil sampling accomplished in support of
the permit renewalp posed. This is a back-up alternative, the primary option for the City of
Conover will remain the Regional Biosolids, Compost Facility operated by the municipal
consortium and located in ffickory.
Location
The sites examined arc located north of Conover on City farm Road. The sites are currently
permitted to serve as a receiver for biosolid materials and the only applications in the last few
years have been those from the City of Lenoir accomplished`through an emergency
agreement executed between the respective municipalities and the state. The sites at Sipes
Orchard occupy landscape positions typical of those encountered throughout the Piedmont
Region of North Carolina. The sags examined are located on SR 1484 Sipes Orchard d or
County Home Rd. The sites occupy locations ns located to the east and west of the roads One of
the two sites has been designated for permit purposes as NE while the other has been
designated SW.°These sites are in pasture and they are well suited for the land application
operation proposed, The land use has not changed since the initial permit was issued in 1992,
Access to the sites is off SR 1484 and the ingress and egress are suitable. The well
established pasture sites are well suited to eei e this material.
Site and Soil Conditions
The soil resources mapped on the Sipes Orchard property are typical of those encountered
throughout the Piedmont, The Modem Soil Survey of Catawba County indicates that the
predominant soiis mapped can the site include: Cecil and Pa let on the upland landscape

NOV-14-2002 THU 09*.49 AM FAX NO, P. 04
positions and Altavista in the terrace positions. These soils are very well suited for crop
production and serve well as biosolids receiver sites.
The slopes on the receiver sites have not changed since the initial land application permit was
issued in 1992. The are identified as buffers and areas with the steep slopes remain a
concern with this or any land application prograrn.'These areas are evident on the site maps
and clear to anyone on the site, nonetheless the ORC must label these areas with flagging to
assure no materials are applied within designated buffers should the land application
proposed become necessary. The as with slopes in excess of 12% should not be included
in the areas intended to receive bias lid materials, or to any land application operations,
the areas with steep slopes and the areas in the flood -plain should be identified as a part of
the site buffer and no material applied therein.
Soil Testing and Recommendations
Pasture grazing and bay harvest are adequate as crop management measures on the Sipes
Orchard site. The livestock benefit from the grazing and cause no apparent damage to site
soils. Pasture grasses are well established and could benefit from the addition of lime and
phosphorus as indicated in Table 2, Nutrient and Lime Recommcndations. These nutrients

FRX K F05
NOV-14-2002 THU 09'50 AM
are not required for agricultural operations, but must be supplied if biosolid materials are
applied to any portion of the, site,
Conclusions
The sites intended to serve as potential receiver sites for biosolid materials are well suited for
this land use activity. Prior to any application of'biosolid materials, supplemental lime will be
required, This adjustment to improve soil fertility is essential to assureno adverse impacts
from the application of biosolids.
In addition to the soil fertility adjustments, the biosolid materials applied to these sites must
be stabilized and treated to achieve the required level of vector attraction reduction and
pathogen reduction prior to any application. This can be achieved by digesting the material or
it can be achieved through lime stabilization and injection. Regardless of the method
selected, documentation must be provided to regulatory agencies that both the VAR and
PSRP treatment has been achieved prior to any land application. Please note the
recommendations described by Mr. Frederick concerning slopes and the need to clearly
identify as of concem prior to any biosolid application.
Respectfully Submitted
A., R. Rubin Scott Frederick

Site Investigation
for
City of Conover
by
A.R. Rubin, Extension
Specialist
Biological Engineering`
N.C. State University
North
The Town f Conover,t facilities
d a very successful land treatment program to recycle the nutrients in the wastewater
i s lids back onto agricultural land. The success of the existing land treatment program has
resulted in numerous requests for the stabilized biosolids as a source of nutrientsfor on -going
agricultural tires in Catawba County. Requests tobe includeda beneficial
yyprogram y� •sh -s a v privy ° . sitesevaluated
in . a F
1) Moser Property
Orchard
Rector Property
Holder Property
Each of the sites evaluated has potentialt and renovatea portion of or'the entire volume
f stabilized bio lids generated by the Town oaf; Conover, North Carolina. The Orphanagesite
does,have the t capacity to accept municipal biosolids and the entire volume f biosolids
produced by the Townof Conover could be applied to Orphanage property. The remainder of
the sites do have capacity to accept a significant volume of material. Moser property
onlyrow siteevaluatedd bio li s application limited tDcarly spring application.
The remaining sites are in pasture and stabilized biosolids, can be applied at anytime the cropping
system *ts
There are two purposes to the brief report which follows. The first is to describe
conditions encountered can each of the sites. The secondis io concerning
appropriate nutrient loadings onto each site.
Site o
Each of the sites evaluated is located on the attachedof Catawba County,
Carolina. In generalthe on each of the sites evaluated is well suited for inclusion in the
land treatment pro u tly operated by the Townof Conover. Each of'the sites proposed
are described in some slight detail below.

The hand auger borings indicate that the predominate soils encountered = typicalof
thoseof Catawba County, North Carolina. Typical or
representative a descriptions for the sites are:
Moser
brown sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky friable
many fine and medium roots
,"- i "
Light blocky" few fine
medium
- *
Red clay; weak,e blocky few fine medium roots.
240 - 48"
Red clay to loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; friabletD firm; Slightly
sticky and slightly tic; few fine medium
"
Boring ternunated with id f iseasonal
saturation but e p li i i e into e profile.
(i
" - 4
Gray brown sandy , weak, fine, subangular blockyfriable loose;,
many fine d medium t..:
Light gray sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky friable; few fine
mediumand
* "
Red clay;, fine, subangular blocky , few fine medium roots.
* - "
Red clay to loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky, friable to firm; slightly
sticky and slightly tic, few fine medium roots.
(2
* *Graybsandy
l e, b i i loose;
,w ,
fine and
mediumman
"_ 1 "
Light gray sandyloam; w i '; i,few fine
mediumand
" - "Red
clay;yyeak,, fine, subangular blocky few fine medium roots.
" - ,Red
y l , , sub 1 , k, b btly
sticky slightly tic, few a medium roots.

"- " y brown sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure friable to loose;
many fine and medium
" l "Light gray sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky; few fine
roots
" - ",Red clay;lfew fine roots.
32" - 36" Red clay to loam; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; friable to firm; slightly
"sticky and slightlyplastic;"few fine roots.
Boring terminated no of seasonal highl ut saprolite intruded
profileinto
z"ri
"_ y brown sandy loam-, weak, fine, subanguLaw blockye friable to loose;
mediummany fine and
" " Light gray sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blockyc l ; few fine
roots
8* - 28" Red clay; weak, fine, subanguLaw blocky structure; fIew fine roots.
clay to l , subangular blockylslightly
sticky y tic, few
QW Boring terminated o evidence of seasonal high water table but saprolite intruded
into profile.
Rector
" " Gray brown sandy loam; weak, fine, subangular blockyfriable loose;
many fine and medium
" 120 Light gray sandyloam; w , fine, subangular blockyx l;twv fine
roots
1 " " , subangular blocky ; few fine roots.
" 4" y to 1 e, subangular blocky, friableb , slightly
" dslightly plastic; few fine roots.

T
table42" Boring terminated no evidence of seasonal high water ut saprolite
into profile
Holder
on - 8" Gray brown sandy l , subangular blockystructure friable to loose;
mediummany fine and
12" Light gray sandyloam; weak, 1 sfriable; few fine
roots
weak, a subangular blockystructure; few fine
roots-
30" - 42 Red clay to loam; ; weak, fine, subangular blocky structure; ffiable to firrol slightly
sticky slightly tic, few e
" Boring terminated no`evidence of seasonal high water tablebut saprolite
into profile
The it resources encounteredeach of the'sites are well suited for the land treatment
system roposed. The soil resources encounteredfew limitations for a land based waste
treatment a vosystem.
e results of the soil fertility sampling are used to assess needs for supplemental
nutrientsd lire. The; fm-dlity levels, of production to encourage agricultural
or silviculatural crops. Typicalfor these soils
[
The it material encountered on b of the sites is well suited � for the land treatment
systemd light, textured, loamy topsoilwill cave t of constituents into
e soil. The heavier textured clay to clay loam subsoil will retain nutrients in these

Penuft No.. "d "0004 1 (City of Conover Residuals Land Application Program)
Subject: Pennit No. WQ0004381 (City of Conover Residuals Land Application Program)
Shannon Thomburg <shannonthornburg 0qncmaInet>
Organization: E
`: daryl meffitt <darylmerritt@nctnaflnet>
Ellen,
You can take this one off of ty'a last of expired residuals r ra
emit .. »ire just received their permit renewal application a :ka today.
day .
Thanks for your help in calling these Per ttweea d
Shannon
1 df 1 /6/2004:41 PM

M
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
c n
qut"
0
Signature of Preparer Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) dr different from Pertnittee and Preparer)
,I k v &,
4
F UN C 4
Note- Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) WATIE,"', Q1,UALITY OEM FORM CF (1/2002)
Non-Dis11charge Compl-5t� ,111,119 Enf,

N CERTIMCATION FORM
ANNUAL LAND APPUCATIO
Permit lrrrtrbcr County a JU 4'jj k�. Year
0
Facility Name as shown on
Phone #
Land Application Operato
Land application of residuals as "owed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar "Mo, IF RESIDUALS WERE
YES NO. If NO, SKIP PART 1. AND PARTIIAND PROCEED To THE CERTMCATION
THE RESID WERE NDLED
ZE--NERATED BUT NOT LAND APPLIED, PLEASE ATTACH AN EXPLANAn0j,4 ON HOW UALS HA'
-Part I - M A P 4
• Total number of application fields in permit. �002
• ToW number of fields land application occurred during the year.
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites. 7'
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the year.
j
Part, 11
Facility was compliant during calendar year 200_ with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to
items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of at Quality LIANT, THE
YES _-- NO. IF No, PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DEscRwno,-; W14Y THE FAWA
C11= S NOT COMA
5 -iE-.AND EXPLAV CORRZ-C.MVE ACT10N TAKEN,
A
different from Per
MEMO
L2
Signature of Pe "tree Date
er Date eSignature of Land Applier Date
nitt) -eat from Pernlittee and Preparer)
ee
Note- Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
OEM FORM CF (112002)

PP!ermit Number
ANNUAL LAND APPUCA170N CERTMCA710N FORM
C " ,Court
'Y
Facility Name shown on pert)
d Application Operator, Fhon �
Land application!
li do f r f 5 above t t end year
YES . if NO, Part 1 Part if d, p to , if idua ere t
t land applied, please explanation ation n how the residuals
3
*Total number of application fields in permit.
V
*Total number of fields land application occurred cluring the year.
*Tutal amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sates.. r *Total number of acres land application occurred during the year.
�,.
Facility was compliant during cal ndaa; year 199 with all condition;; of the land application p rmW
(including but not limited to items -1 to by'the Division of Water Quality
EF N0,13LEASE p
iDan_AJNC0RRECrMAcnON TAM.
I. y residuals approved for this permit were applied to e permitted sites.
2. Soil p' adjusted s in the permit lime was a x to achieve a soil
PIH of at least 6.0 or the dt s ,t.
3. Annual so" w ` a on each site e past calendar year
and three ( copies of laboratory a ac
analysis was performedcopies of certified laboratoryresults
s .
S.
other monitoring was performed in accordancee permit and reported during the year as
copiesrequired of certified laboratory attached.
6. a 'facility not e of Pollutant Concentration LionLimitsiTableof
.1 or PollutantLoading in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13. (applicable t
7.
»1management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14
8.(appir« fartred facilities) t were compliedor, in the case of a
attionar u "on w r'the Division of Water
9. o contravention of Ground a Quality Standards
pp at a monitoring or
explanations of violations a to include appropriate e r "atio
10. fie tine s t - o sitecrops o were
ed
i t
11» o fZ
u ti �n si nto tproperty or nearby surface a
has o
buffer requirements as specifiedon the permit were maintained each ii do t;
of residuals.
Permittee Name and Title (type or printi
Signature of Preparer Date
Cif different frout P'e 'ft
Note: Preparet Is defined to 40 CFR Part 0.(r
1iggfnature �P!rmitfttee ate
Signature f Land Applier Date
(if different Permittee and a t
OEM O ( /94)

pp -
State of ;North Carolina
Department Environment
and Natural Resources
Division Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. t v n , Director
January 12, 2001
LL YD B."BEASLEY
CONOVt3R, CITY -A SLUDGE/CONOVE
PO BOX 549
ONt VER, NC 2861
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FEBIRr �
2001
Subject: Annual Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
Treatment and Land Application of residuals
Permit Number- WT100 381
CONOVER,CITY-A SLT. DGFJ iN 1V
CATAWB A County
"t r 1. 0
l0
REGIC,44AL OFFICE
Dear LLOYD B . B ASL Y
The purpose of this letter is a reminder that the monitoring report,: required by the subject pernut crust be submitted
as an Annual Report for calendar year 2000 by no later than March T, 2001, The report must be submitted tic
triplicate) to the following address.
T:1ENRa" )WQIWater Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit;
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N,Ct 27699-161
Due to limitations in storage space;; please submit the reports in bound form rather than in notebtaok form-
r_-
Pentrittees are subjec€ to civil penalty for trailing to submit the .Annual deport as required by their permit.
Enclosed ;are the summer), and certification sheets that must be used for your annual report. Please c onaplete these
sheets and if necessary male copies of the blank forms if extras are. needed. The forms have not changed since last
year, so you may use those you already have on hand.
You will however mate that the forms include information required by EPA as outlined in 40 CFR Part 503, Since the
reelulrertents of 40 CFR Part 503 are self implerne`ntin , they are legally binding and enforceable federal
requirements for all persons subject to the requirements of 40 CFI Tart 503, even if these requirements are not
currently contained in the state permit, The, annual reports for the EPA roust be received by EPA at the following
address on or before February 19„ ` 001.
Hector Danois
Clean Water Act Enforcement Section
`dater Programs Enforcement Branclt
Water Management Division
L1.S.EPA Region
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
.Atlanta, pia. 3030 3 31 1
1617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 7699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative tiv Action Employer 0% r cycle /10% post -consumer paper

Annual Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Page 2
If there is a need for any information or clarification on the State reporting requirements, please do not hesitate to
contact Brian Wrenn at [phone] extension 529. For further information on the Federal requirements, you
should call Madolyn Dominy of the Environmental Protection Agency at 404-562-9305.
Sincerely,
4
Brian L. Wrenn,
Environmental Specialist III
cc: Vince Miller, EPA Region IV
MRO Regional Supervisor
Non Discharge Compliance / Enfoi-cernent File
Central Files

State north Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James a Hunt Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr Ta Stevens, Director ,
Sit,,
December 27, 2000
LLOYD B. BEASLEY
CONOVER, CITY -A SNUDGE/" Ni3V
PO BOX 549,urx
Subject: PERMIT NO. WQOOO4,381
CATA i B COUNT °
Dear Perrnattee:
Our files indicate that the subject perrint issued can I 1/ 14/97 expires on 4/3 /01. We have not received a
request for renewal frcaaan you as of this date..
A renewal request shall consist of a letter asking for permit renewal and four i copies of ra completed
application, For permitted facilities with treatment works, a narrative description of the residuals management
plan, which is in effect at the permitted facility, must also be submitted with the renewal application.
Applications may be, returned to the applicant if incomplete,
The General Assembly passed legislation incorporating renewal fees into the annual fee,
Please be advised that this permit must not he allowed to expire. You must submit the renewal request at
least 180 clays prior to the permit's expiration date, as required by the 15 'ACNCAC ?l-t .0 11. Failure to request a
renewal at least 1.80 days pricer to the permit expiration date and/or operation of a facility without a valid permit
may result in the assessment of civil penalties. NCGS 1 3-215, iA allows for the assessment of Civil penalties
tap to .10,000 per violation per day.
The letter requesting renewal, along-, with the completed Non -Discharge Permit Application rrnust he sent
to,
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
R 0. Box 29535
l ralei h, Mirth Carolina 762 -05 5
1 1 r Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 7 -1 17 Telephone 91 -7 - 0 FAX 91 -, -071 g
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 1 % post -consumer paper

If you have aquestions concerning this matter, please contact Thelma Williams a
l 733-5083 extension 556,
Sincerely,
Kira H. Colson, P.., Supervisor
Non -Discharge har Permitting Unit
c. Mooresville Regional Office:
Central Piles

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural l Source
Division of'V Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REgEE S"I ED
Lloyd B. Beasley, City Manager
City of Conover
P.O. Box 549
Conover, NC 2861
k4
„,.>
l l�t�A�t
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Failure to Submit 199 annual Deport
Permit Noe WDili 04381
City of Conover
Land application of Wastewater Treatment Residuals
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Beasley -
The Division of Water Quality is issuing you a Notice of Violation and Recommendation endation for Enforcement for failure
to submit an annual report of Distribution and Marketing activities for the 1999 calendar year, The Division of Water
Quality mailed you a reminder letter, complete with instructions and forms, in December 1999.
The issued permit rewires that an annual report of activities be submitted to the Division ofWater Quality on, or before;
March 1, of the following year. The Non -Discharge Compliance 1 Enforcement Unit has not received your 1999 annual
report;
You must submit one original and two codes to the letterhead address within 10 clays of receipt of this letter, The
timeliness, and completeness of the response will be considered in the potential enforcement action. It should be noted
that a violation of the state issued permit for reporting can result in the assessment of civil penalties of up to $1 ,0Cltl 00
per day for each violation.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all,
applicable state laws and regulations,
If you have any questions regarding this Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement, please do not
hesitate to call me at 91 -7 3- t1 3 ext. 529.
,Sincerely,
tail
Nevin H. Barnett,
Environmental Specialist III
cc: Mrt.,Effen H rnnn; Mooresvilte Tt6gibrraf Off ice"
Non -Discharge Compliance 1 Enforcement Unit
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Technical assistance and Certification Unit
Central piles
Afailing Address. -Telephone [phone]
1617 Mil Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 7769 -1617 ,State Courier ## -01-01
Are Equal Opportunity 1Aartnative Action Enip1qyer
http:/ l"z20,ertr,sttite.tic° tes•
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC :2769 -1617

general location map, showing orientation of the
land application sites with reference to at least
two j geographic references membered roads,
named streams/rivers, etc.).
x A site -specific map, with 'topographic contours
rs
(contour interval should not exceed 10 feet or 25
percent of total site relief, whichever is less),
for each of the land ap
plication sites showing the
property boundaries and the location of all wells,
springs, lakes, ponds„ or other surface drainage
features within 500 feet of the waste
treatment/disposal sites `» Wells should be
labeled as to their primary usage (drinking water,
process water, monitoring, etc.)
_. A soil evaluation of the disposal sites conducted
by a soils scientist to establish a soils map
through field evaluation of soil texture, dolor;,
structure, the depth, thickness and type of
restrictive horizons, ns, ;the presence or absence and,
depth; of evidence of any seasonal. high water table
and recommendations concerning application ;rates
of the waste constituents. The investigation
shouli
also incl
ude field estimates or
measurements of saturated hydraulic conductivity
in the most restrictive horizon, and cation
exchange capacity.
4. s per the conditions of your current permit, you
were required
� to install groundwater monitoring
wells. These wells were to be sampled and _
analyzed according to a schedule and for those
parameters as specified in the permit. A search
of our records indicates that, as of the date of
th
is s letter, no groundwater monitoring
itorin data
a a have
been received. please submit all results of
groundwater sampling and analysis which have been
obtained to date» if no samplingand/or analyses
have been co
nducted,
ed u are re
quested nested` � y to sample
the wells and ;report the results of the analyses
s specified in the current permit.
5. Boring lags and well construction details for all
existing monitoring wells. Such information
should include ground surface elevations at each
well location and 'static water level measurements,

D fv ,
in" VF-Twwwx mum
PTMORANDUM
TO: "'
DATE: �
FROM: Jack Floy
'x
SUBJECT: g Pnwal./Amendment of Permit
dew Permit
Facility Nam
County
Type of Project
Central Office Contact:
Applicable Permit Numbers:
EPA AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your regional office for comment on or about
You should review the application package for completeness
and ade ua y of relevant information and summit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
Nov , 1 that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at one time. A copy of - our formal
request, to the applicant for additional information will. be
provided to you
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, you should
review the application package and ,submit your comments to Sao by
19,10
If a copy of the application package has not been made
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that
a copy can he forwarded to you as soon as possible.
F: a/ ppl. hl

Applicant assur
with approved
P.O.
Title. City Meer Conov r , NC
ignst 1s a `i'atsphono
INSTRU TIONN:
Lfill-ire All Spaces. If not applicable, enter N/A.
;Secure appropriate signature (mavor/city manager for municipality. chabintua for as
corporation, or legally constituted hoard or rosturissioa to c of pro and woe
;proper official if design engineer or other agent sigait oppl ' beau,
, aabmit to Division of Environmental Management. Petvaits asut Engirraoring Trait. P.
1'EJ
industry )-
is ge or Waste Flow,
(NPDES No.)
ad and maintained in accordance
Zip Code„ 28613-0485 r -1-1 1
00tari t board, owner/proper official of
Mar of authorleation is required from

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community v loam n
Mooresville ° nal Office
Janis G. Martin, Governor Albert F Hilton, Regional Manager
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 5, 1986
Mr. Jimmy A. Clark
City of Conover
Post Office Box 549
Conover, M. C._ 86
Subject: Well Construction Permit No.
0222 -004
City, of Conover Land Application
Ireddll. County, N. C.
Dear Mr. ark:
In accordance with your application received August 4, 1986 we are
forwarding herewith Well Construction Permit No. 48-0222-WM-0047 dated'
August 5, 1986, issued to the City of Conover for the Construction of d
monitor well system.
This Permit will be effective from the date of is issuance until
January 5 1987 shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein.
8-a1nre 1.1r
4
Ronald L. McMillan
Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Permits & Engineering
Mr. Bob Cheek
Central Files
J' :pb
919 North Main P.O.Box ilk, N.C. 28115 50 • `3'' 3-1
n Equal Opportunity Affirnutive Action Empkrvt

yaw w
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELL OR WELL SYSTEM
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, North Carolina
General Statutes, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
The City of Conover
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITOR WELL SYSTEM located off State Road 1502 in
Iredell County in accordance with the application dated August 1, 1986 and in
conformity with specifications and supporting data, all of which are filed with
the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and are
considered a part of this Permit., The monitor well system is to be
constructed in the residuum of the Blue Ridge Inner Piedmont Belt Hydrogeologic
System.
This Permit is for well construction only, and does not waive any
provisions or requirements of the Water Use Act of 1967, or any other
applicable laws or regulations.
Construction of a well under this Permit shall be in compliance with the
North Carolina Well Construction, Regulations and Standards, and any other laws
and regulations pertaining to well construction.
This Permit will be effective from the date of its issuance until January
5, 1987 and shall be subject to other specified conditions, limitations, or
exceptions as follows:
1. The borehole shall not penetrate to a depth greater than the depth to
be monitored or the depth from which contaminants are to be
recovered.

PPP
Permit No. 48-d - 4
Page Two
2. e well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
. Construction materials shall be compatible with the contaminants to
be monitored or recovered. The casing shall equal or exceed Schedule
4d'.
4 The well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from land
surface cannot migrate into the gravel pack or well screen area.
5. When a gravel pack is placed around the screen, a seal shall be
installed above the ,gravel.
o rout stall be placed in the annular space between the casing and
the borehole wall from land surface to a depth within two feet
above the top of the well screen or to the bottom of the casing'
for open end wells.
. All wells shall be secured to reasonably insure against unauthorized
access and use. The well shall be permanently labeled with a warning
that it is for monitoring, purposes and the entrance to the well must
be secured with a'lockable cap.
B. All wells .shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage
during construction and use. The well head may be terminated below
land surface provided it is covered with a water tight seal.
. Each well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
10. A completed -1 and espies of all water quality results must be
submitted for each well to the Division of'Environmental Management.
11,. When any monitor well is no, longer useful for its intended purpose,
it shall be properly abandoned and an abandonment report filmed with
the Division of Environmental Management.
Permit issued this the 5th dad' of August, 1986.
FOR THE NORTH CAROLKAIR Ml"l I SI N
Ronald L. McMillan, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental ana of
Permit No. 48-0222-WM-0047

NORTH CAROL INA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MONITOR/RECOVERY WELL(S)
To: NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION _August 1 1986
Gentlemen -
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, General Statutues of
North Carolina, and regulations pursuant thereto, application is hereby made by
Cit of,Conover for a permit to consfr-ucta
Yn_a_me�_�Ooo weowner
monitor/recovery well(s) as described below and in the accompanying data submitted as a
part of this application.
(a) Name of property owner: Jim Robinson
(b) Location of property: Rt. 3, Box, 394 (Sharon School Road), Statesville, Iredell
County
(c) Type of facility or site_being monitored: Pasture - Sl­ --
T__'
(d) Types of contamination being monitored or recovered:
pH, TOC, Chloride, Water Levels, Total Col iforms
(e) Existing monitor well numbers: None
(f) Existing monitor wells showing contamination (well no.): None
(g) Estimated water -table depth: 40 - 50 feet
(h) Estimated date of construction: Begin 8-20-86 Complete 8-27-86
(i) Drilling constractor: vice
(j) Location of well: Provide a detailed map showing the location of the proposed well(s).
and of any wells in an existing monitoring system (if applicable), in relation to the
pollution source(s) being monitored and to at least two (2) nearby permanent reference
points such as'roads, intersections, and streams. Identify roads with State Highway
road identification numbers. (Show all existing water supply wells within a radius of
1,000 feet of the proposed well.)
(k) We.11 constriction diagram: Provide a diagram shc'Wi-g Pe ace constr�.ictlort spcirications,
including diameter, estimated depth, screens, sand pack, grout, type of materials, etc.
The Applicant hereby agrees the proposed City of Conover
well will be constructed in accordance with P.O. Box 549, Conover, NC 28613
approved specifications and conditions of _Mai i_n_gAddress of W`eTT -Owner-Required)
the Well Construction Permit. As regulated
under the Well Construction Standards (Title
15 - North Carolina Administrative Code,
SubchaDter 2C) (Mailing Address of Agent -if other
than above,
S i g ni�i _ure Owner or Agent
Jimmy A. Clark FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Public Works So e dent X, C, TA r"I", OF N11 I
i,pe,rinten RAL
4 'Mj . "" " '-.3'
j�� s sued
C03131UNI'jrj y j ,,�, 19,
n-0
GW-22B 4
_0110
141SMIN IFS fAW10'MV0N!,RU
0106RUVIL' Al[Ratt"tt

SteelF Locking Cap
Outer Casing
if plastic i 7�1. Borehole to be six inches
largerthan outside diameter �.
casing.
SurfaceLand c"
,2. Casingn screen tebe
a
centered in borehole.
Nea
t , . g n Shaul noi
be aboven high seasone(
water level.
Well Casing
. Casing andscreen material t
or larger i
be compatible with type of
contaminant being monitored.`
ii i rat nit 04 Pe
+11 h to labeled with
hig
hly
visible ruin saying:
*Well is for monitoring and not
61-
considered saf for drinking."
Clean Wah Well to be affordedreasonabit
Sand or G
ravel rat ati in t damage
after construction.
Well Screen
x
1 184

� h w
JIM ROBINSON
AR. FIELD #1
30 ACRES
04
1 iMc ref. �a45\`
t gq f�
k ma's -� i X`". ,,�" .. _ ,,;,,�..^ ""� � .+„' •'„_-"""' i, ,�;� � M�'�` C -. � � � jp� � f"� .��� 4'���„,
y?'58 " d
17
FIELD #2
-`' S
r
r ,
..
�, `1'�
IZZI
4 "� : i e �•+`� `4, t* Ste'- �� "w" `b;"�0' .a"°�'s ^v,m w
,
`. ✓"_ma's R , 'w.. „ C t" ' p p. , v
fe
COUNTY
ALEXANDER
i f -
.k'tiry
A A 'fixCOUNTY
yYtt"5sna�'�----�- � � i .�✓" yam,
J
mg � -
6 " s ° A
TOPO MAP
LAND APPLTCATION OF SLUDGES
CITY OF CONOVER, N.C.
a
siv SCALE 1" 000' CONTOUR INTERVAL ,`e�1.7 ak
1/3/86

DIVISION UT ENVIRONMENTAL MANA EM NT
January 30, 1986
MEMORANDUM TO: Len Bramble �
THROUGH: Ron McMillan.
f1tUN: Jesse Well
P+
SUBJECT: City of Conover
Land Application
Permit ApplicationNo. APNO06302
Catawba County, N. U.
A review of the permit application from the City of Conover for land
application of sludge was made by the Mooresville Regional Groundwater Staff.
The applicant proposes to haul sludge from the following sites. Southeast
Wastewater Treatment Plant, Southwest wastewater Treatment plant, Northeast
Wastewater Treatment blast, and Fairgro e Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The draft site investigation indicates the five receiver sites to be a
Cecil-Pacolet soils and eorgeville-Herndon type soils. These soils are
described as being well drained with slaw permeability. The receiver sites
consist of two fields JimRobinson) in Iredell County'and three fields (Fleta
Icehhour, Tolls Icenhour, Arlie ate) in Alexander County.
From our understanding, the sludge from all treatment plants is to be
hauled to the various sites on a schedule which will vary according to sludge
generation rates, weather conditions, and condition of the receiver site.
review of the sludge analysis conducted by the Biological and Engineering
Department at North Carolina State University and'B. A. F. Laboratories
indicates higher COD levels in the Southeast and Southwest plants. The BT
Leachate analysis for the plants indicate levels below groundwater
classification standards with the exception of iron.
It is the recommendation of this Office that a permit be issued to the
City of Conover. The applicant should be required to maintain at least one
control field for groundwater monitoring. The Jim Robinson Site(Field #1 30-
acres) and the F°leta Isenhour Site (Field #3 -acres) appears the best suited
for groundwater monitoring. The monitoring should, consist of one upgradient
and two day gradient wells. Suggested parameters would include NO3, Tip, IDS,
pH, TCC,,Cl, Fe, Specific Conductance and W/L. Background water quality should
be established prior to application of sludge.
If more information is needed, please advise.
cc; Bob Cheek
Thurman Horne

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 30, 1986
REMORANDUM TO: Len Bramble
,7
THROUGH: Ron McMillam -I
FROM: Jesse Wells t
' 1�1
SUBJECT: City of Conover
Land Application
Permit Application No. APNO06302
Catawba County, N. C.
A review of the permit application from the City of Conover for land
application of sludge was made by the Mooresville Regional Groundwater Staff.
The applicant proposes to haul sludge from the following sites: Southeast
Wastewater Treatment Plant, Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant, Northeast
Wastewater Treatment Plant, and Fairgrove Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The draft site investigation indicates the five receiver sites to be a
Cecil-Pacolet soils and Georgeville-Herndon type soils. These soils are
described as being well drained with slow permeability. The receiver sites
consist of two fields (Jim Robinson) in Iredell County and three fields (Fleta
Icenhour, Tolly Icenhour, Arlie White) in Alexander County.
From our understanding, the sludge from all treatment plants is to be
hauled to the various sites on a schedule which will vary according to sludge
generation rates, weather conditions, and condition of the receiver site. A
review of the sludge analysis conducted by the Biological and Engineering
Department at North Carolina State University and B. A. W. Laboratories
indicates higher COD levels in the Southeast and Southwest Plants. The FP
Lea hate analysis for the plants indicate levels below groundwater
classification standards with the exception of iron.
It is the recommendation of this Office <that a permit be issued to the
City of Conover. The applicant should be required to maintain at least one
control field for groundwater monitoring. The Jim Robinson Site (Field #1 30-
acres) and the Fleta Isenhour Site (Field #3 39-acres) appears the best suited
for groundwater monitoring. The monitoring should consist of one upgradient
and two do gradient wells. Suggested parameters would include NO3' TA, TDs,
pH, TOC, C1, Fe, Specific Conductance and W/L. Background water quality should
be established prior to application of sludge.
If more information is needed, please advise.
CC; Bob Cheek
Thurman Horne
JUIW: pb

Dl ION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
February 12, 1986
MEMORANDUM
,00DR E SM L L E_
TO: T"1a7NN`ut r Mouberry
THROUGH: Bob Cheek A*4
FROM: Len Bramble
SUBJECT: Non -Discharge Permit Application
City of Conover
Land Application of Sludge
Alexander County
APNO06302/GW85142
(Cecil Madden: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit
application and have no objections to the proposed project
en the following recommended conditions:
(1) Prior to beginning waste disposal operations: three
monitor wells, one upgradient and two downgradient,
should be installed to monitor groundwater quality at
the Jim Robinson Site (Field #1 30-acres} . The
location and construction details for these wells
should be by approval of the Mooresville Regional Of-
fice, from which a well construction permit must be
obtained. _# Y
(2) The monitor wells should be sampled initially after
construction (and prior to waste disposal operations)
and thereafter every March, July, and November for the
following parameters:
NO PH
To&l Ammonia TOC
TDS Chloride
Water Levels Total Coliforms
The measurement of water level should be made prior to
sampling for the remaining parameters.
(5) No land application of waste activities should be
undertaken when the seasonal high water table is less
than three feet below land surface.
LB/ls/210J.
cc: Ron McMillan/Bill Crawford
Jesse Wells
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

ne
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
f)ivision of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
g : ul Wilms
ras�, Martin, uer`nor tt. ��ti �4,° �
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary GROUNDWATERSECT � � ���.� � �,3 . .
Etirector
December 11, 1985
,fir. J. Ed, Robinette, ManagerHUL
'
City of Conover I
PO 'Box 485
Conover, NC 28613-0485
SUBJECT.- Non -Discharge Permit Application
Land Application f Sludge
City of Conover
Catawba County
APNO06302/GW85142
;Dear Mr. Mete
As part of the Division of Environmental Management's comprehen-
sive approach in addressing the impact of waste treatment, storage,
r disposal projects on the environmentt your permit application has
been forwarded to us for assessment of the potential impact of the
project can groundwater quality.
Our initial review indicates that the data submitted is not suf-
ficient to slake this assessment.
Before your application can he processed therefore, you are re-
quested to submit the following information to the Groundwater Sec-
tion;
1 site -specific map, with topographic contours (contour interval
should not exceed 10 feat or 25 percent of total site relief,
whichever less) , showing all facility -related structures
within the property boundary and the location of all wells,
springs, lakes, ponds, or rather surface drainage features within
500 feet of the principal waste treatment/disposal site is .
Wells should he labeled as to their primary usage (drinking
water, ;process water, monitoring, etc.)
Pollution Fwvcntion Pays
0, Box 27687, RakO, 7 11*7 %kv4— 919-733-7015
An Equal Chvortmity Affinnadw Acfion EmpkWer

PPPP"
(4) Hydrogeologic profile, via band or powered soil auger borings,
to a depth of 10 feet or partiallye tb f d bedrock, whichever
is less. The
should be sufficient to define:
the major is of lithologic
strata underlying the site
(b) the estimated vertical hydraulic conductivity of the
<
consolidated thickness of total stra
ta
encountered
(depth of the mean seasonal high water table (if definable
from soil morphology or from evaluation of otter applicable
availably eta)
NOTE: In the event the permitted facility; will utilize
several separate disposal fields overlying different
major soil types, at least one (l) hydrogeologic
profile should be established for each of the major
sail types.
Please feel free to contact the Groundwater Section, at ( 1
733-5083, 4f
information is
required.
, clarification
dat�.0 n.ufor
Sincerely,
Len Bramble, Leader
Permits and Registration Group
lb,/'ll d
cc: Ron McMillan,,
Bill Crawford
Cecil Madden
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

¢.
,,X,,,,VISIONENVIRONMENTAL MEN
}. GROUNDWATER SECTION
xOctober 23, 1985
ofi-"'C
MEMORANDUM
:: Bill Crawford
gen Bramble
Application for-Renewal/Amendment of Permi .
X New Perm.
Facility Name: City of ;Conover
County(ies):Catawba
'hype of Project: Land Application of WWTP Sedge
We have received a copy of the above referencedp li i ,
whichwas sent to your regional office for comment on or about
October 15, 15
You should review the application package and submit your com-
mentsone by November 13 ► 1985.
If a copy of the application has not been made available to your
office, please let me'k6
/tom
f Permit Issuance Files

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 18, 1985
MEMORANDUM TO: Len Brumble
THROUGH: Ron McMillan a�-nam
FROM: Jesse
s
td
SUBJECT: City of Conover
Applicationo: APNO06302
Land Application of Wastewater tewater Treatment Sludge
A review of the permit application from the. City of Conover Land Application
was maderby the Regional Groundwater Staff. The report by G. Eugene Smithson
Associates, Inc. makes no mention of soil characteristics below a depth of four'
feet. Additional information needed to evaluate the impact`of these application
sites would be as follows
1 A map should be supplied providing location o sites with reference
to state road numbers. The -map should include the location of any
well, springs, etc.. within 1000 feet of each site,
(2) "topographic maps should be de available detailing existing topography.
Borings should be made to a depth. of 20 feet or anger refusal at each
site and'a geologic description of soils encountered.
4 Depth to the ` an seasonal high water table needs to be determined
for each site.
Background groundwater quality needs to be determined prior to
application of sludge.
„;. Monitoring wells should ne required at sites receiving ',waste from the Southeast:
; k plant due to the COIF levels reported in the Smithson Associates report.
If you should have any questions, please advise.
JWW/pb