WQ0002702_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (31)

27
ry
�y : 7p; �
z.c

WON

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • A
Mooresville Regional Office A�j
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � C
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
Vivian H. Burke, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 15, 1994
Mr. Bob Noble
Nazareth Children's Home
Post Office Box 1438
Rockwell, North Carolina 28138
RE: Alchem Project Status
Rowan County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Noble:
As a follow up to our recent telephone conversations
concerning the status of the lagoons at Alchem, Inc., I am
enclosing information from our files for your review. The
information shows two areas where our Department has had
involvement with Alchem. The first concerns the contamination of
the Poole well and the second was the permit (non -discharge) for
the lagoons. As I also mentioned, the laboratory results from
the monitor wells at the lagoons show no contaminants detected.
I hope this information is helpful. Should you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Barbara S. Christian, P.G.
Regional Groundwater Supervisor
Enclosures
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

COMPLAIN.BVB
Request/Complaint Form
Name of Caller: PT:r IWJI ( 4' I/t,�.t, 141-" dl" �wV1-G
Address:�•U � G U I
7j g
/fc- l 34
Telephone: ��o�� A, -7
Directions to Site: SZ
a- j2 4- Aa-z.e d,
��� � ��,,,.,� _- f�� .. � :��.�,► � � cam. % r�^�� .
Nature of Complaint: )11/1. /i,", n -tL �
L"-k
u u k04k llti)_ ��W V e,t/t,
Received By:
Date:
Time:
6 --7t,
_7_p

' - GW�.200
Incident Name: 1 C_ 1-� rfi4 =�C�t _f —4 R 01,q aQJA y J Page 1 of 3
Z rr,sadwater Iadd=t ne # q 9 g %
Ran1Cing Performed br. L �.f s ir..,gae SCR
f, 'Date-
NORTH CAR OLINA
GROUNDWATER COWANMATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
SITE PRIORITY R.AN WG SYSTEM
(To be completed by Regional Office)
3. VENT RA' A� n ASSES SMZn P_o1n is Awn rrt �r1
A Etc osion - free product in coraned area.% or vapor phase product
detected at or above 2D% of the lower explosive limit or at bealtb cancers levels;
award 50 points total �.
B. Fire - free product subject to ignition in exposed areas sucb as
surface water impoundments, streams, oaavations, etc.; award 50 '
points total .
3L EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
A Contaminated Drinking Water Supphes
1. Prizate, domestic water supply well containing substances in eaa
centrations exceeding 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards;
award 10 points per well
2. Public or institutlm-X water supply well containing substances in
concentrations exceeding 15A NCAC 2L groundwiter quality
standards; award 20 points per Vmn -
3. imeedances of Class W5-1 surface water quality standards as a
result of groundwater discharge; award 20 points per surLL= water
body impacted
4. Ira cater supply well identi.6ed in items II. A. 1 and 11. A. 2 caniotbe
replaced by an existing public water supply source requiring hook-
up only; award additional 10 points per irreplaceable well
B. Threat to Uncontaminated Drinking Water Supplies -
1. Prtsate, domestic water supply well located within 1S00 feet doom
gradient of contaminant source; award 10 points per well
2. Public or institutional water supply well glocatedd
, within 1500 feet
dowradierd of contaminant source; award 15 points per well
S. Raw surface water intake for public water supply located withta 112
awe downgradient of contaminant source; award 5 points per water
supply rAt= `
4. If any well identified in items TL B.1 and II. B. 2 or an intake tm item
17. B. 3. are located within 250 feet of contaminant source; award
additional 20 points total (not per weZ or intake)
C. Vapor Phasd Exponn
L Product tiapom detectedsn sahabitable building(sl below 2054 of the Iow+c
. rxplo" limit ar hraltb coneem 1rve%- award 30 paws ADW

MEMO
G
DATE:
SUBJECT:
From:
�?rno.
`= North Carolina Department of Environment
Health, and Natural Resources Printed on Recycled Pape

Narre
lbgion/County ' ' U
Gro uidwater Incident File #
Ranking Performed by prate
GROWDMTER CCNTANIMTICN INCIDENT MANACEMU]T
SITE PRICRITY RANKING SYSTEM
Points
Awarded
rr a • •�r � � is
A. Explosion - free product in confined
areas or vapor phase product detected
at or above.20% of the lower explosive
limit; award 50 points total
B. Fire - free product subject to ignition
in exposed areas such as surface water
inpoundments, streams, excavations,_ etc.;
award 50 points total
A. ..Contaminated Drinking Water Supplies
1. Private, domestic water
supply well containing substances
in concentrations exoseding Cuss GA
underground water quality
standards; award 10 points per well
2. Public or institutional water
supply well containing substances in
concentrations exceeding Class GA
underground water quality standards;
award 30 points per well
3. Exceedenoes of Class US-1 surface
water Quality standards as a result
of groundwater discharge; award 20
points per surface water body impacted
4. If a water supply well identified in
items II.A.1 and II.A.2 cannot be
replaced by an existing public water
supply source requiring hook-up only;
award additional 10 points per
irreplaceable well

GR 0:)ntamirnation Incident Management
Site Priority Ranking System
page 2
B. Threat To Uncontaminated Drinking Water Supplies
1. Private, domestic water supply well
located within 1500 feet downgradient
of contaminant source; award 10 points
per well
2. Public or institutional water supply
well located within 1/2 mile dawngradient
of contaminant source; award 15 points �—
per well
3. Raw surface water intake for public
water supply located within
1/2 mile downgradient-of contaminant
source; award 5 points per water �--
supply system
4. If any well identified in items II.B.1
and II.B.2 is located within 250 feet
of contaminant source; award additional
20 points total
C. Vapor Phase Exposure .-
1. Product vapors detected in inhabitable
building(s); award 30 points total �-
2. Product vapors detected in other confined
areas (uninhabitable buildings, sewer lines,
utility vaults, etc.) ; award 5 points total
III. CUTMCGRAN'P HAZARD ASSESSMENT (chemical groups are
categorized based on toxicity, mobility and
persistence in the environment). . Evaluate the
most hazardous substances detected and select only one
of the following:
A. Award 30 points total if contaminants detected r
are identified with any of the following groups:
1. Aromatic (Benzene) Acids
2. Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene Derivatives)
3. Sulbonated Hydrocarbons
4. Halogenated Hydrocarbons
5. Alkaloids
6.- Anilines
7. Phenols
8. Aldehydes
9. Ketones .
10. Organic Sulfur Conpoasds (Sulfides,
Mercaptans)
11. Organanetallic ODnpounds

Cad Contamination Incident Management
Site Priority Ranking System .
Page 3
12. Cyanides
13. Esters
14. Metal Salts, Including Heavy Metals
B. Award 20 points total if contaminants detected
are identified with any of the following groups:
1. Aliphatic (Fatty) Acids
2. Alcohols
3. Aliphatic Hydrocarbons (Petroleum Derivative)
4. Pyridines
5. Zhiocyanides
6. Mineral and Metal Acids
7. Mineral and Metal Bases
8. Oxides
9. Sulfides
C. Award 10 points total if contaminants detected
are identified with any of the following groups:
1. Aliphatic Amines and Their Salts
2. Sugars and Cellulose
3. Carbon and Graphite
A. Free product thickness of > 1/4 inch
detected on water table iri observation
or monitoring well; award 20 points-- -
total
B. Contaminated Soil (select only one
answer)
I. Soil saturated with product
(saturation determined by release of
free liquid upon compaction of a soil
sample by band pressure) ;
award 10 points total
2. Soil exhibiting organic vapor content
above 100 ppm. as measured by organic
vapor or volatile organic detection
equipment; award 5 points total
C. Uncontrolled or Wabated Primary Source (including
dumpsites, stockpiles, lagoons, land appli-
cations, septic tanks, landfills, underground
and above ground storage tanks, etc.)

(W Gbntamination Incident Management
Site Priority Ranking System
Page 4
1. Suspected or confirmed source
remains in active use and continues to
receive raw product, wastewater or
solid waste; award 20 points per source
2. Active use of suspected or confirmed
source has been discontinued or source
was caused by a onetime release of
product or waste, however, source
continues to release product or
contaminants into the environment;
award 10 points per source
jJjQj*j-.L.j TT
A. Vertical Contaminant Migration - Literature or
well logs indicate that no confining layer is
Present above bedrock or above twenty feet below
land surface; award 10 points total
B. Horizontal Contaminant Migration - Data or
observations indicate that no discharge points
or aquifer discontinuities exist between the
source and the nearest downgradient drinking �---
,water supply; award 10 points total
C. Hydraulic Gradient Is Determined By (select
only one answer) :
1. Calculations based on groundwater level
measurements; award 10 points total
2• observation of significant recharge/discharge
features in the vicinity of contaminant source
and Local topographic features; award 5 points
total--
3. observation of local topographic features
only; award 0 points �---
D. Existing Groundwater Quality
1. Analytical test(s) performed on groundwater
sanple(s) obtained from site confirm presence
of substances in concentrations exoeeding Class
GA underground water quality standards; award
10 points total
2. Source(s) identified in Section IV constitute
the only known source(s) of contamination �---
resulting in exposure or potential exposure
identified in Section II; award 10 points total
TOTAL POINTS MQARDED

ALCHEM, INC.
P. 0. BOX 171
ROCKWELL. NORTH CAROLINA 28138
[phone]
January 11, 1986
•. L ��L'tJl 1711li�'ai
Mr.'Monty D. Payne, Chemical Analyst
N. C. Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
P. 0. Box 950
Mooresville; NC 28115-0950
Dear Mr. Payne:
I am writing to you to advise you of our progress at Rockwell. We have completed
the following items:
1. Drilled a new deep well for Mrs. Poole with a new wellhouse to her
satisfaction.
2. Removed the old galvanized pipes from under Mrs. Poole's house and
installed new PVC pipes. Purchased a new icemaker for her refriger-
ator.
3. We have cleaned up the area around the well by scraping up several
inches of soil. The soil was deposited on our property so that
runoff from the soil would go into one of our lagoons.
4. We then limed the affected area and used a tractor to disc the soil
and mix the soil with lime.
5. We are working with the low, swampy area just north of the ponds
so as to raise the pH of the small stream.
6. We are cleaning up our entire area. All of the drums have been
removed and all of the scrap polyethylene also.
7. We established a berm around the raw material storage area so
that no aluminum hydroxide can leave the storage pad.
We will continue to work with the NRCD so as to improve our plant site.
Very truly yours,
AL
Randall F. Andrews
sj
cc Mr. Julian Foscue, Mr. Richard Doby, Sr., Mr. Rex Gleason, Mr. Jesse Wells

October 17, 1985
THE HARTFORD
Charlotte Regional Office
5525 Albemarle Road
P.O. Box 25600
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
Telephone: [phone]
Mr. Jessie W. Wells
The State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
Re: Mrs. Patricia Poole vs. Al -Chem, Inc. T �� T., T�jZ
File Number: 342 LP 38916 13- ,, _ ._
Policy Number: 22 UEC KW1108
Date of Loss: On or About 4/l/85 C'C',S,�'
Dear Mr. Wells:
I received your results on the samples taken from Mr�J'��Ptto,°,1e 1� r.4p'eQlAconcern-
ing the captioned claim. If possible, please indicate
'e°first date of this
accident. You said the water samples were collected on 3/27/85. Is this the
approximate date of this accident? Also, you indicate that there was a run-off
that was the result of this incident. Is this a known fact or is this a guess
on your part? It will be very helpful if we can determine the exact date when
this happened.
At the present time, we are still investigating this claim and as soon as all
matters of the claim are cleared and there is no doubt as to coverage or any
liability on the part of our insured, we will respectfully honor any recommen-
dations for clean-up of Mrs. Poole's property.
Please submit your recommendations to the clean-up of the stated claimant's
property. Also, our insured, Al -Chem, has informed us through Mr. Randall
Andrews that they had permission from the State of North Carolina approximately
two years ago, to dump this material into the pond. Is this the case?
When I spoke to Mrs. Poole, she advised there was never a pond on Al-Chem's prop-
erty during the time the run-off occurred. Do you know anything about this?
I would appreciate any other correspondence or information in regards to this
matter. Your anticipated cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
W. Alan Anderson, Claim Representative
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
WAA : t c
jsr raw _-*:id
Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its Affiliates
0948t/17 Hartford Plaza, Hartford, Connecticut 06115

E �--
r _ ggALCHEM, INC.
171
ROCKW L�NO FI27ii CAROLINA 28138
�I av 6k "VMGRr ifift,7*279=7*8
September 18, 1985 -gi p 20
INCORESVIUE y
L':m55,Wr� g,
Mr. Julian Foscue, Oestern Area Supervisor
N. C. Department of'Human Resources .J
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Division of -Health Services
Environmental Health Section
P. 0. Box 2091
Raleigh, NC 27602-2091
Dear Mr. Foscue:
I am writing to you to advise you of the steps we will take to insure no future
contamination of the area around our chemical plant at Rockwell, North Carolina.
The items we discussed and what we said we would accomplish are as follows:
1. Get a non -discharge permit to operate the aluminum sulfate plant. I
have already talked with Bob Teulings by telephone about submitting an
application. I will have the necessary analytical work performed
and will make every effort to send this application within three weeks.
2. As of 9:00 A.M. on September 18, 1985, I had still not heard from
Robert Glaser about the need for the monitoring wells. We discussed
the need to pump all liquids from the current holding pond into tanks
as fast as possible and use the water from the holding ponds for make-
up water for production. This is currently being done. As soon as
the pond -is reasonably dry, we will check to see how far the alumi-
num sulfate penetration may have gone. We would plan, at that time,
to add agricultural lime to the soil to bring the pH up above six.
3. We will establish a berm around the aluminum hydroxide pad so that,our
raw material will not be washed off the pad onto the ground. We would
expect to do this within the next two weeks.
4. We will sprinkle lime around the sulfuric acid pump and any other
locations where small acid spills may occur. We are going to pre-
pare a system so that any acid leaking from the pump would be caught
in a catch basin and returned to our process. We are also going to
try and cflnstruct a spill containment device so that if any sulfuric
acid is spilled during unloading, we can contain it and pump it
into our process. We are going to start work on this within the
next week.
5. The pond in front of the office is dry. All liquids in it were
pumped into our process. We have put nothing into it and it is dry.
If necessary, we could sprinkle some lime into it to raise the pH.
I apologize for taking so long to respond. You can be assured that we are taking
corrective measures and will work with the North Carolina Department of Human
Resources in every way possible.

ALCHEM, INC.
P. O. BOX 171
ROCKWELL, NORTH CAROLINA 28138
[phone]
PAGE TWO
Mr. Julian Foscue
September 18,.1985
Very truly yours,
AL HEM, INCgjW JJ4,_&W�
Randall F. Andrews
sj
cc Mr. Jerry Rhodes, Mr. Monty D. Payne, Mr. Andrew (Mack) Henderson, Mr. C. Richard
Doby, Sr., Mr. D. Rex Gleason, Mr. Jesse Wells, Mr. Robert L. Glaser
0

ALCHEM, INC:-
P. 0. BOX 171'-
Rb6KWELL, NORTH 6'40LINA 28138<
[phone]'
August 19, 1985
Mr. Monty Payne
N. C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
P. 0. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115-0950
Dear Mr. Payne:
N.C. DEPT. OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND
C0I1Y1U1N1TY DEVLLOP??FNT
AUG 20 1985
DIVISION OF Efll'InOl1G E'r;Tt,l 11ANJUEMENT
MOORES'VILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
I am responding to your letter of July 24, 1985. We expect to start cleaning
any aluminum contaminated soil near Mrs. Poole's property the week of August
19, 1985. After cleaning up any contaminated soil, we will place some agri-
cultural lime back into the area. We will then place some top soil on top
of the agricultural lime. I feel that this lime would react with any residual
or manganese ions. I have filed a claim with my insurance company concerning
Mrs. Poole's well and I feel certain that we will be able to effect a satis-
factory resolution of the problem with Mrs. Poole very shortly.
As for the lagoon liner, we have not placed any material in lagoons since
August 9, 1985, and do not expect to do so in the future. We plan to build
a retaining wall around our raw material storage area so that there will be
no more aluminum hydrate runoff. We expect to build this retaining wall -
within the next two to three weeks. We expect to start and finish a clean-
up of the stream on the north side of our property within ten days. We plan
to build a containment device to capture and use any leaking sulfuric acid
from our sulfuric acid pump. We expect,to build a containment vessel at
both areas where we'have strainer cleanouts. We plan to purchase some agri-
cultural lime and use it to neutralize any future small spills. We have
already carried two truckloads of waste polyethylene to the Rowan County
landfill and we expect to finish cleaning this area the week of August 19,
1985.
I would like to have an opportunity to come and meet with both you and Rex
Gleason in the latter part of the week of August'19, 1985, to discuss this
proposal. I will call you on either August 20 or August 21 to set up an
appointment.
Very truly yours,
AL M, INC.
Randall F. Andrews
sj
cc Mr. D. Rex Gleason, Mr. Andrew (Mack) Henderson, Mr. Jesse Wells,
Mr. C. Richard Doby, Sr.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 14, 1985
MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Jeter
THROUGH: Ron McMillan
FROM: Jesse Wells �q
SUBJECT: Alchem, Inc.
Rowan County, North Carolina
On August 8, 1985, I attended a meeting at the Alchem facility near
Rockwell in Rowan County. In attendance at the meeting were Messrs. Randall
Andrews (owner); Rick Doby, Mack Henderson (Solid & Hazardous Waste); Rex
Gleason, Monty Payne (DEM, Water Quality Section).
Mr. Andrews guided us over the plant property discussing the process
procedure. Mr. Payne took pH readings from random run-off sites and water
run-off collection ponds. The pH readings ranged from 0.00-3.80 in different
areas of the plant. After noting the low pH ranges, Mr. Doby and Mr. Henderson
indicated that this plant would fall under their jurisdiction as a hazardous
waste site and that Solid and Hazardous Waste would be responsible for arranging
monitoring and clean-up of the site.
I discussed with Mr. Andrews the possibility of drilling Mrs. Poole
a new well to replace the bored well which has become contaminated. We also
discussed the removal of material which had previously left the Alchem site
onto Mrs. Poole's property. I will keep you informed on further developments.
If you should have any questions, please call.
JWW:se

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Keith Andrews
Post Office Box 171
Rockwell, N. C. 28138
Subject: Alchem Runoff
Clean-up of Polluted Area
Rowan County, N. C.
Dear Mr. Andrews:
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 24, 1985
This Office has received numerous complaints concerning Alchem. The
complainants are concerned about run-off of the product (aluminum hydrate)
stock piled behind your building, and ground and surface water contamination
caused by the run-off..
On.April 1, 1985, this Office obtained soil and well samples from Ms.
Patricia Poole's property. These samples showed a high concentration of
aluminum and other metals. The well sample showed.that it had amounts of
aluminun and other metals above the recommended level for human consumption.
Again on May 2, 1985, Ms. Poole's well was sampled and again the results showed
the well water unsuited for human consumption.
Stream samples obtained from the stream below Alchem during the last eight
months have shown a continual elevated level of aluminum and other metals.
Samples of the substrate from the stream revealed a; pH of 4.5 units when mixed
with the stream water, which is below the Water Quality Standards for Freshwater.
It is the determination of this Office that the contamination of Ms. Poole's
bored well is a result of the run-off and groundwater infiltration .from matela-LoLl
stored on your property. Arrangements should be made to remove the material from
Ms..Poole's property. After removal of the material, arrangements need to be made
to pump the well of Ms. Poole. The effluent from the well must be pumped into the
lagoons. Additional treatment of the well water may be necessary in order to
provide Ms. Poole a useable water source.
Secondly some type of lagoon liner needs to be placed along the walls -and
bottom of the lagoons to prevent any further groundwater contamination. Finally,
arrangements need to be made for the clean-up of the stream and to restore the
stream back to its original condition.
919 North Main street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Keith Andrews
Post Office Box 171
Rockwell, N. C. 28138
It is requested a written response be submitted to this Office by no later
than August 19, 1985, explaining what actions are being taken for the clean-up.
In responding, please direct your comments to the attention of Mr. Monty Payne.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Payne or me:
cc: Rowan County Heal /hDepartment
Mr. Jesse Wells
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Engineer

TO:
SUBJECT, Alc4em
on &/q/`g,.5. -Rem 6ikolo-, rno-4y Payne Oto ( :t Mel' w1pli, Iee,'IA
Alldrzw 9 i- -hem, -Inc. � poss, . 41,e jj q V;.
A emke),? ai A
(7-W C/Q;s;-4',CJ"&-" :r 11"1101,"Iecc Mr. andrews 10;
7?, A,,ur rdpw,l 0h;c/i h4d bee" doaivtd t se'"c
oFf'-f-e- S�cj� � Ss;jilc
a rM #i Yn
$e,
w / Ynr.
dytiflcd- wells on *,e properl, of
Neze Y.
Air
North Caroling Depart mentof Natural
Resources &Community Deve,iop ment

P"p -M,: E M
DATE:' „r ,
C43',: SUBJECT: /
..
,`�,". >��° �- ` _• '�.rfi ��� '�Ca d��(::f;p'+'�.t.:'�� t`r�,gr'_ sa F � ,rry ��,�s
�y/'y}f�� � t„r �fi% � �� �C n 'a-�iTe� -�ir . �'� x�a.✓�'.��i.�� 2''...J�i�d 1 •
` 11 �F L ff' Na�Yr�1 VPi,
{ a �'
cl�'4��t�s'�r5
-17
4a„
,'� �� `y / ��'. al...r � � '.'� � •;9'; �'yJ ''t /''.!+' �� 'a" �. �. y" d 7�V��e a .I�� .� i:,
North CarolinaDepartment of Ndfura!l
Resources &Community Development
-_

,
1
,1
,1

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 9, 1985
MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Jeter
THROUGH: Ron McMillan
FROM: Monty Payne/Jesse Wells
On November 15, 1984'this Office received a complaint from Mrs. Carol McCombs
about Alchem and runoff from their property onto other people's land. Mr. Payne
of the Water Quality Section investigated on November 30, 1984. Mr. Payne found
that the runoff from Alchem had ponded up on other people's land. He took samples
of the water and the pH was below 2 standard units, colormetic paper. The results
showed a high concentration of Al, Fe, Na, and Zn, see results.
In early December this Office got a complaint about a white creek near Alchem.
Mr. Payne took samples where the creek crosses under Highway 52 and these samples
showed a high concentration of Al, Fe, and Mn.
Two follow-up investigations was conducted in January, 1985 and all stream
samples showed a heavy concentration of Al, Fe, and Zn. During this time a small
tributary was found going into the creek and sampled, the results showed a high
concentration of Al and Fe. Groundwater contamination was found at this time and
Jesse Wells of the Groundwater Section was called in. Mr. Wells sampled two wells
for contamination and the results showed no contamination.
On March 26, 1985, Ms. Patricia Poole called this Office and was concerned about
her well being contaminated. Tana Fryer and Monty Payne investigated and found where
runoff from Alchem had gotten onto her land and ran within 40 feet of her well.
Samples of the well showed a high concentration of Al and Mn. They also checked the
stream below Alchem and it had a yellowish -brown billowy substrate. This was
believed to be alum that has settled out from the contamination. Secondly, they
found a path that the runoff had followed to within 100 feet of the stream. Soil
samples were obtained of the runoff to the stream and Ms. Poole's land, and the
results showed a high concentration of Al and Fe. Stream samples were also obtained
above and below the.tributary, which showed a heavy concentration downstream of
the tributary and very little contamination upstream of the tributary.
On May 2, 1985, Jesse Wells visited the Poole residence. Mrs. Poole's well is
a 24" bored well, 49 feet total depth. Mrs. Poole had a water analysis report from
the Rowan County Health Department. '(Attachment #1). Mr. Wells took a pH and
Specific Conductance sample. The pH was analyzed as 5.3 and specific conductance
was 410.
Mr. Payne is to have a joint meeting with Keith AndxBws_, owner, Jesse Wells,
Groundwater Section, Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional Engineer, and Ron McMillan,
Regional Supervisor.
If more information is needed, please advise.

`� ��I`; � WSJ` �;. � ^ F�Sy£ � � lZ+.y`=e° ,C ��/-J o \��_ . °�• . \i.. ��J/. \� �\ � 1\
or. ftl-
- ", �'' "^a �, . , � .� r � � , Yam ,i r �`�. • 3. ��� �� ��? o --
l ,• � Fes'"+ a `sr` '
• yr' n� o� a � �%' �-_ -L/� � - - v •_J--__ �r� i/ _'y .s�,, � � } I =J � :�; •I
II` f ,-J�' ;yam _ `e':' �71 • ;u�° '�i�� 1 ..•n'•� ' r�° f.
i991
�J n, -�• � !,, ='`cam' .�-. o"�, II• f ,� p !°
CV
f �,,� • a: _ 1,
I\ ,„ j r, t., 1.t •'� :off �-.•. >��_ °
Ol� 1 � `` ° 4 � •�. 4� C �4 J..,.. -� \ ti • v j`r� �.\ , • % 1 _ Y Y��� y).:) i � � • �,\ \ 'S�
s-n+....1�. 'll `�' �l'y 1 t3;1'ki• 7 ,1.%��•,� W � T��. 1 �\ II n - � , ���� V .
ROAD D ��i� 3 • ••,• •� `\ II to ^'� �cflj', /,• 0° °� I fir:_._
/ i � U !1 F" � �.•�L•t•F, •/ 'tea o "'-rlt�,�. � �. �.

Z
m

0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
POST OFFICE BOX 950
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT OF Complaint Investigation: Alchem Inc
PLACE VISITED Alchem Inc. Rockwell
DATE Report Date: 12/30/85
ADDRESS P. 0. Box 171 Rockwell RIVER BASIN Yadkin
BY WHOM Mr. Monty
Payne, Ms. Tana Fryer, Mr. Rex
Gleason, Mr. Jesse Wells TIME SPENT
PERSONS CONTACTED Mr. Randall Andrews, Mr. Keith Andrews, Co -Owners
REASON FOR VISIT Com laant Investigation
COPIES TO: Ijowan County Health Department
Jesse Wells
REPORT: On November 15, 1984, this Office received a complaint concerning runoff
from Alchem, Inc. The complaint was.about.material stockpiled at the site running
off onto adjoining property and washing into a nearby stream as a result of rainfall
runoff.
On November 30, 1984, Mr. Monty Payne of this Office investigated. The
investigator observed where rain water and spillage entered a makeshift catch basin,
from_which it had overflowed onto adjacent property. Mr. Keith Andrews, Co-owner,
was contacted at this time and he explained how an excessive amount of rain fall had
caused the basin to overflow,..and they (Alchem) were planning to recycle the water
in the basin back to the plant, remove the contaminated soil in the field and build
a larger basin to prevent future runoff.
Mr. Andrews also explained that the material stored behind the plant was
their raw product, aluminum hydrate. Which they combined with concentrated sulfric
acid to made a high grade alum. The aluminum hydrate in the contaminated soil and
rainwater could be used in their process after some of the impurities were removed.
Checking the pH with litmus paper before collecting samples, the investigator
found that the pH was not greater than 2.0 standard units at the catch basin and in

f
Page Two
the adjacent field where the runoff had accumulated. The metals sample obtained
at the same locations showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron, sodium and zinc.
The stream below Alchem was checked by Mr. Payne at the bridge on SR 2340, but
nothing abnormal was observed, although the metals sample taken did show a slightly
elevated concentration of aluminum and iron.
On December 6, 1984, this Office received a complaint from the City of
Rockwell's maintenance department concerning a white coloration to an unnamed
tributary to Second Creek. On December 7, 1984, Mr. Payne investigated. He found
no discoloration to the creek, but the sample obtained did show a high
concentration of aluminum.
On January 2, 1985, Mr. Jesse Wells, of this Office, and Mr. Payne returned
to the Alchem area to sample wells at adjacent residences for possible contamination.
Neither of the wells sampled showed contamination but a stream sample obtained
showed very high concentrations of aluminum, iron, zinc and manganese. On
January 7, 1985, stream samples were again obtained and again they showed extremely
high concentrations of aluminum, iron and zinc.
During the time of mid December through early January, the stream bottom
became covered with a dirty -white floc. This floc appeared to start where a small
underground spring, or tributary, entered the creek. It is believed that this spring
or tributary was contaminated from material lea6hing through the soil at Alchem.
On February 28, 1985, stream samples were again obtained and they also showed
high levels of aluminum, iron and manganese in the creek.
On March 26, 1985, this Office received another complaint from a resident in
the Alchem area about possible well water contamination. The complainant was
concerned about his/her well water being contaminated because it had a brownish
color, bad taste, and left a residue on anything that was exposed to continuous
water contact.
The following day, March 27, Ms. Tana Fryer,,of .this Office, and Mr. Payne
investigated. Because of the excessive amount of disturbance in this area the
(the area was being cleared and the brush burned) the investigators did not find
the runoff complained about, for they were under the impression that the runoff
had just occurred. But on a return investigation on April 1, 1985, they found the
runoff complained about, which appeared to have occurred sometime before the complaint.
Soil and well water samples were taken at the complainants residence during
these visits. The soil samples showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron
and magnesium; the well water sample showed high concentrations of aluminum and
manganese. Stream samples were also taken. The samples upstream of the small
underground tributary did not show the high concentrations of aluminum, iron,
manganese, iron and zinc as the downstream sample did.
The final discovery from these visits, was a path that the runoff had followed
toward the stream. Although the path stopped 100-150 ft. from the stream, it
was still very pronounced.
Stream samples obtained on June 11, 1985, showed a high concentration of
aluminum, iron and manganese downstream of the small tributary. Upstream of the
tributary these concentrations were higher than expected, but nowhere near the
level of the downstream sample. Bioassay samples were also taken at this time.

Ado -es s
e epnon-e
:ireciicii s ;ice_.
All, �t/�/S 1
// o (/ e e � al'? ed^ n)is-� H ep 7/d/�1 6,4
N /J/ U / , �TP� ��S � �e. I—Z, T D T
Received By: T�hp
Date:
In,,,estiaated Ey:
Corresoonder;cE Prepared By:
Date(s) of Investioation(s):
Date(s) of Report(s):

Page Three
The downstream sample had a LC50 of 27%; the upstream sample had a LC50 of
zero, no toxicity. The Aquatic Toxicology Group who performs bioassay testing for
the State, reported that what appeared to kill the test organisms was a low pH.
In July more stream samples were obtained, The tributary was again used
as the dividing point to separate upstream and downstream. Next the stream
was vertically divided into an upper and lower zone, providing four areas to
consider. The top zones, both upstream and downstream, showed no problems with metal
concentrations or pH, but the bottom zones showed a vast difference. The upstream
bottom zone showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron and zinc, but no pH
problem. The downstream bottom zone showed high concentrations of aluminum, iron
chromium, copper, manganese and zinc; it also had a low pH.
On August 8, 1985, a meeting was held at Alchem, Inc. with Mr. Randall
Andrews, Co-owner of Alchem Inc., Mr. Richard Doby and Mr. Mack Henderson of
Solid & Hazardous Waste, Mr. Jesse Wells, Mr. Rex Gleason and Mr. Monty Payne
of the Division of Environmental Management. The meeting dealt with what
impact Alchem was having on the environment and a walk through the plant.
During the tour, the pH was taken at several points and a pH below 2.0 units was
found at several points, which classified the material as hazardous. Therefore,
the clean-up of this facility comes under the jurisdiction of Solid & Hazardous Waste.
On September 9, 1985, another meeting was held, in Raleigh, with Representatives
from Alchem, Solid & Hazardous Waste and this Department to determine what actions
need to be taken for the clean-up. It was determined that the ponds need to be
emptied and the contaminated soil be removed and if the lagoon was continued to be
used it had to be lined. Secondly the contaminated soil has to be neutralized or
removed. Thirdly, the contaminated well would have to be cleaned or a new well
put in. Last, there was an excessive amount of spillage throughout the plant
which had to be controlled.
Summary: The samples obtained over the year show that an excessive amount of aluminum
and possibly sulfric acid has escaped from the facility, which has apparently caused
surface and ground water contamination. Alchem has begun clean-up procedures in
conjunction with Solid & Hazardous Waste and Division of Environmental Management.
They have removed some of the soil around the contaminated well and replaced this
well. They have also submitted an application for a non -discharge permit to
construct an additional storage lagoon, which is being evaluated by this Office.
This Office will keep abreast of the clean-up at Alchem until it is completed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Alan Anderson
Hartford Insurance Company
P. 0. Box 25600
Charlotte, N. C. 28212
Dear Mr. Anderson:
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 24, 1985
Per your letter of October 17, 1985, I will attempt to provide you with
the information which you requested. The first complaint that was received
in this Office concerning possible runoff from the Alchem plant occurred
November 15, 1984. The complaint from Mrs. Poole concerning possible contamination
of her well was received March 26, 1985.
The restoration of the Poole property should be addressed to a firm which
specializes in the containment and clean-up of contaminating materials. One
option is to remove the contaminated soil, replace with top soil and re -seed
the area. Some considerations needs to be given concerning the depth of soil
which should be removed in order to maximuze recovery of the contaminant. Any
plans concerning the restoration of the site must be submitted to this Office
for review.
I have attached copies of laboratory reports on sediment samples collected
on April 1, 1985 in the vicinity of the Poole's residence. The sediment sample
results indicate levels of aluminum to be 210,000 mg/kg and 220,000 mg/kg. Mr.
Wells contacted Mr. Lipe Barrier, District Conservationist, Soil Conservation Service
concerning naturallyoccurring concentrations of aluminum in the Rockwell area.
Mr. Barrier indicated that aluminum concentration can vary over a wide
range due to present and former land usage. He suggested that a soil sample be
collected in area on the Poole property similar to where the runoff appeared
to have occurred in order to determine background levels.
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Alan Anderson
October 24, 1985
Page Two
In response to your question concerning the pond, this Department did not,
to my knowledge, permit the ponding of material, however this may have been
suggested as a means to prevent off -site runoff. On May 2, 1985 when Mr. Wells
became involved with the Poole complaint, Alchem Inc., had contructed a berm to
prevent off -site runoff. At this time, Mr. Wells noted what appeared to have
been runoff material from Alchem on the Poole property. When this incident
initially occurred has not been documented.
If you should have any question please contact Jesse Wells or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald L. McMillan
Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Randall Andrews
Mr. Bill Jeter
r. Monty Payne
Mr. Jesse Wells

L -
Nance"
. •QY Warn `�•
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Randall F. Andrews
Industrial and Agricultural Chemicals, Inc.
Route 2, Box 521-C
Red Springs, N. C. 28377
Dear Mr. Andrews:
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 18, 1985
Attached is a copy of the letter which I sent to Mr. Allen Anderson,
Hartford Insurance Company, concerning the water samples collected from Ms.
Patricia Poole's bored well. I have also enclosed the laboratory reports
on water samples collected to date from the Poole well.
If you should have any questions, please telephone me at [phone].
JWW/pb
Sincerely,
Jesse W. Wells
Hydrogeological Technician I
fir„., c„ Marx; s
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

SrMt
'4
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 11, 1985
Mr. Allen Anderson
Hartford Insurance Company
P. 0. Box 25600
Charlotte, N. C. 28212
Dear Mr. Anderson:
_ Per your request, I have attached two laboratory reports on water samples
collected from Ms. Patricia Poole's bored well. The well was sampled as a result
of a complaint investigation concerning the run-off of materials from Alchem, Inc.
The water sample collected March 27, 1985 indicated elevated levels of
aluminum and manganese. Samples collected on May 2, 1985 indicated decreased
levels of aluminum and manganese, however, the levels were above expected back-
ground water quality of the Rockwell area.
The expected range of aluminum in the Rockwell area would be less than
100 - 200 ug/l. At present, no drinking water standards have been set for
aluminum levels. The drinking water standard for manganese is set at 50 ug/l.
This level is.based upon aesthetic quality. Levels above 50 ug/1 can produce
staining of laundry and fixtures. -_
It has been suggested to Alchem, Inc. that the run-off material be removed
from the land in back of Ms. Poole's property. Any water treatment of Ms. Poole's
well should be addressed to a company which specializes in this type of work.
On September 10, 1985 I collected another sample to be analyzed for aluminum,
manganese and iron. I will send you a copy of this`arialysis when it is received
in this Office.
Sincerely,
esse W. Wells
Hydrogeological Technician I
cc: Mr. Ron McMillan
Mr. Bill Jeter
Mr. Monty Payne
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

STArF o
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Randall F. Andrews
Industrial and Agricultural Chemicals, Inc.
Route 2, Box 521-C
Red Springs, N. C. 28377
Dear Mr. Andrews:
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 18, 1985
Attached is a copy of the letter which I sent to Mr. Allen Anderson,
Hartford Insurance Company, concerning the water samples collected from Ms.
Patricia Poole's bored well. I have also enclosed the laboratory reports
on water samples collected to date from the Poole well.
If you should have any questions, please telephone me at [phone].
JWW/pb
Sincerely,
Jesse W. Wells
Hydrogeological Technician I
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

qwn
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. David A. Efird
Route 1, Box 947B
Rockwell, North Carolina 28138
Dear Mr. Ef ird:
Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 24, 1986
Attached are the laboratory reports on the water samples collected from
your two—inch and six—inch water wells located on your property off Wilcoy
Road in Rowan County. The analyses indicate that the water is of good chemical
quality. If you should have any questions regarding the results, I would
be glad to discuss them with you.
If this Office can be of further assistance, please contact us at
[phone].
Attachment
JWW:se
Sincerely,
Jesse W. Wells
Hydrogeologic Technician
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115,0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. David A. Efird
Route 13 Box 947B
Rockwell, North Carolina 28138
Dear Mr. Efird:
Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 24, 1986
Attached are the laboratory reports on the water samples collected from
your two-inch and six-inch water wells located on your property off Wilcoy
Road in Rowan County. The analyses indicate that the water is of good chemical
quality. If you should have any questions regarding the results, I would
be glad to discuss them with you.
If this Office can be of further assistance, please contact us at
[phone].
Attachment
JWW:se
Sincerely,
Jesse W. Wells
Hydrogeologic Technician
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

COUNTY C N.CI FPA_RTMENT OF NATURAL. RESOU 5 LAB NUMBER 8
+'� r`T �ICIi `C, rr-� i�i.-,l . i - II " ri ii h- 1 [>'�;: Y �•"� •`
QUAD NO. ' � I SERIAL NO. L `�&=iGO:I�ILVIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE RECEI EjiD� '' Time
LAT. tDM 'd by: From: BusCouri er
Rec
----r-GR°OU,ND,WATER FIELD/LAB FORM Other
Report to: ARO, FRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO, WiRO, = - l"S'
SAMPLE PRIORITY DATA ENTRY BY:Z- �'''-
WSRO, Kinston FO Other -
f�rROUT INE ❑ EMERGENCY DATE REPORTED:
Shipped by: Bus, Courier; Other
COLLECTOR(S):/1Je .Sl�re"i141(tre' DATE'.-�• 1 `.... TIME CrS�'• PURPOSE: BASELINE, COMPLAINT,! COMPLIANCE, LUST, OTHER
[circle one)
FIELD ANALYSES
pH400 - Spec. Cond.94 1 at'250C
Temp.10 oC Odor I IL I E
Appearance � ' e a r Taste
Field Analysis By:
LABORATORY ANALYSES
BOD5 310 mg/l
COD High 340. mg/I
COD Low 335 mg/I
Coliform:MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100ml
TOC 680 mg/I
Turbidity 76 NTU
� -
pH 403 units
((f
Alkalinity to pH 4.6 410 ^�j mg/I
tom'
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415C ! mg/I
-
Carbonate 445 r i mg/I
Bicarbonate 440 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I
Chloride 940 ` mg/I
Chromium:Hex 1032 ug/I
Color:True 80 Pt -Co
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Lab Comments:
Owner
Locati c
Description of sampling point C(AA.`_alVC7- 7a10
) =Ira
Sampling Method Sample Interval I
%(p�u' ;bailer, etc.)
Remarks
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
Diss. Solids 70300
mg/1
t,
Fluorlde 951
< , /
mg/I
i, ,-
Hardness:Total 900
mg/I.
Hardness (non-carb) 902_,((.
mg/I
Phenols 32730
ug/I
Specific Cond. 95
uMhos/cm2-
I/"
Sulfate 945 -�` `
mg/I
1i
Sulfide 745N,5
mg/I
NH3 as N 610
, Q-;�
mg/I
TKN as N 625
mg/I
NO2 t NO3 as N 630
, f !/
mg/I
P:Total as P 666
mg/I
a
Ag - Silver 1077
ug/I
Al - Aluminum 1105
�fl J
ug/I
Be - Barium -1007 =!ea `�i
ug/I
:.✓
" Ca -Calcium 976
. -
mg/I
I-y-1Cd
- Cadmium 1027
J�GJ
ug/I
- L.,"Chromium:Total
1034 Gc "�
ug/I
V^
�Cu -Copper 1042
/_-j
ug/I
.
�Fe. - Iron 1045 `
ug/I
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/I
K - Potassium 937
- a
mg/I
aP
` Mg - Magnesium 927
Y (
mg/I
< Mn - Manganese 1055
_ y7
ug/I
'Na - Sodium 929
� �l�
mg/I
!s
Ni - Nickel 1067-
t
ug/I
7e
,Pb - Lead 1051 r_.
dam.. �
ug/I
Ir,�Se
- Selenium 1147
ug/I
,Zn - Zinc 1092
!
ug/I•
GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample and write 'DIS' in block
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herdicides 1
Base / Neutral Extractable Organics
,Acid Extractable Organics
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle) I
1 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) I

COUNTY r\^1, ` -- N-C-I !'PARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUi
LAB. NUMBER 8 _
QUAD NO. �ti/ k" SERIAL NO.S ���8i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE REC tvE�t�Time.
LAT. `L3 `LIE LONG. RC) i` � �'� YSRtltat9ETJi:,_"�uti.0::s__= DEM �!
Rec'd by: " From: BusN�ou`iex
�" `, c.3'^. "'GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM Other
Report to: ARID, FRO, MRO•, RRO, WaRO 'W:iRO, -
i SAMPLE PRIORITY DATA ENTRY BY:, CK.
WSRO, Kinston FO Other 41_�11FSi11,LE
tT • • 1 0T� [I ROUTINE ❑ EMERGENCY DATE REPORTED: c C
Shipped by: Bus, Courier., Other �p J11
i
COLLECTOR(S):J�(L1.5 'fEaG+�"I<IYt,DATE �aLf�'(') TIME ��1r� PURPOSE: BASEL"INE�, C" OMPLAINT COMPLIANCE, LUST, OTHER
one)
FIELD ANALYSES Owner _ N i'itVlp{
pH400 Spec. Cond.94 at250C Location or site "t1(If r C�- i 6nX °
Temp.10 oC Odor �){%f `- Description of sampling point"���17 <— 10•E%
Appearances---10-%t_$- Taste Sampling Method Sample Interval c 7 t
es
(pump, bailer, etc:) -
Field Analysis By: Remarks
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
LABORATORY ANALYSES
BOD5 310 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
COD Low 335 mg/I
Coliform:MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Colitorm:MF Total 31504 /100ml
TOC 680 mg/I
Turbidity 76 NTLI
4=.
r pH 403 uhi'ts
fr,
^Alkalinity to pH 4_5 410 l [> mg/I
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415-, mg/I
Carbonate. 445 < I mg/I
@r
,"Bicarbonate 440 '1�- mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I.
-Chloride 940 � _ mg/I
Chromium:Hex 1032 ug/I
Coloffrue 80 Pt -Co
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Lab Comments:
Diss. Solids 70300 mg/1
V'Fluoride
951 / mg/I
61
�Hardness:Total 900mg/I
�
i
Hardness (non-carb) 902 �� � 'mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Specific Cond. 95`F uMhos/cm2-
Sul -fate 945 •C5- mg/I
Sulfide 745-mg/I
NH3 as N 610 r mg/I '
TKI4 as N 625 mg/l
' NO2 + NO3 as N 630 ,, /. J m0/I
E
P:Total as P 665 ,�(� 'mg/I
,�P_
%_'4
Ag - Silver 1077
ugh
N/
Al - Aluminum 1105
ug/I
it
Be - Barium 1007
�Lf�
ug/I
' Ca - Calci.um 916
,.
mg/I
e,Cd - Cadmium 1027
G �/
ug/I
Chromium:Total 1034
ug/I
tom•
Cu - Copper 1042
ug/i
(1
Fe - Iron 1045
ug/1
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/I.
-`
K - Potassium 937,
��`a �a�
mg/I
Mg - Magnesium 927
��•a
m9/1
ya.a
Mn - Manganese 1055
��{
ug/1
y�
`Na Sodium 929
rI
mg/I
"Ni - Nickel '1067
�"r�
ug/I
Pf
Pb - Lead 1051
G ��
ug/1
f
"Sa - Selenium 1147
-�' � ug/I
/
-`Zn - Zinc 1092
'Gin
ug/i•.
GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample and write 'DIS' in block
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab
I_ I Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herdicides I
Base / Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle) I
I 1 1,2 - Dibromoethane (EDB) I

COUNTYN.0
QUAD NO. �t , 4 SERIAL NO. t'O �t5e q-
LAT. 3� 3-� t�,' LONG. ec 2 /16
Report to: ARO, FRO,( FRO, WaRO, WiRO,
WSRO, Kinston FO Other
Shipped by: Bus, Courier, Other COLLECTOR(S): LAJ�I�S DATE W1 ;
FIELD ANALYSES
PH400 v Spec. Cond. 94�� at 250C
Temp.10 CC Odor
Appearance f •j��/� Taste
Field Analysis By. �y°=11s
LABORATORY ANALYSES
BOD5 310 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
COD Low 335 mg/I
Coliform:MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform:MF Total 31504 /100ml
TOC 680 mg/I
Turbidity 76 NTU
pH 403 units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
Carbonate 445 mg/I
Bicarbonate 440 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/f
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/f
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chromium:Hex 1032 ug/I
Color:True 80 Pt -Co
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Lab Comments:
PARTMENT OF NATURAL. RESOUR
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY
® ROUTINE ❑ EMERGENCY
LAB NUMBER 80 / t
DATE RECEIVED Ti
Rec'd by: ') From: Bus ;Courier
Other
DATA ENTRY BY: �-� � •J� to CK: % 1
DATE REPORTED:
E5� TIME /115 PURPOSE: BASELINE, COMPLAINT? COMPLIANCE, LUSTJ(Q-W
�`'---(c'+ic e one) f'' PTA,
�ESOUI�t;'�� r1f�7D
Owner f%1JS �Q C't�f!` �acl� Pt, d ri�7,X 9N er.1CresCll � �JJIdITY ririln�.
-- . 11--".1 T
Location or site 5-
Description of sampling point
00
Sampling Method P"�'17 Sample Interval ems.
(pu(np, bailer, etc:)
• ' , 1e r.F t��i)11Q1�1;",i lJTttl Gf11�i9d�j�
Remarks �T mu-". j1Rftnr' VI11Lr na ... 9EUi
((pumping tlme,air temp, etc.T "Luguilfi3 UfflUE
Diss. Solids 70300 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Hardness:Total 900 - mg/I
Hardness (non-carb) 902 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 i NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P:Total as P 665 mg/I
L:..+
Ag - Silver 1077
ugh
AI-- Aluminum 1105
ug/I
Be - Barium'1007
ug/I
Ca,- Calcium 916
mg/I
Cd Cadmium 1027
ug/I
Chromium:Total 1034
ug/I
Cu - Copper 1042
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045
ug/I
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/I
K - Potassium 937
mg/I
Mg - Magnesium 927
mg/1
✓
Mn - Manganese 1055X,,�9, V
ug/I
Na - Sodium 929
mg/I
Ni - Nickel 1067
ug/I
Pb - Lead'1051
ug/I
Se - Selenium 11.47
ug/I
Zn Zinc 1092
ug/I-
GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample and write 'DIS' in block
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab
rOrganochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herdicides I
Base / Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle) I
1 1 1,2 - Dibromoethane (EDB) I

COUNTY h.f,i, ,If-t
QUAD NO. jW i t 1 SERIAL NO.
'J
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO,fMRO'�,.� FRO, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO, Ahoakie FO,
OTHER
N. C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
PURPOSE: , (circle one) baseline pollution monitor, other l- 61C:- r<<
LAB NUMBER
DATE REC'D
s r
REC ' D BY
DATA ENTRY BY (J�Yd' CK!i';{ (d
f�j ?
DATA REPORTED .0 `
DATE COLLECTED i` '� ; J:� Time 103c" By. (ur N< Location or site A 'P, _ / i
Description of sampling point 1l(.;'_} Cr fJ✓'E (, Sampled interval ?y'v
Remarks !: L>,. 2,. .h_f---
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
Field Analysis By: J +? ( f Lat. ?JJ `! 1 Long.
PH Spec. Cond. cJ� Temp. °C )dor y lr t 7 C- Appearance I:' Lt err Taste
Lab Analysis
_,Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
-✓ 9
mg/1
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
i
P71830
mg/1
t Carbonate
P00445
t
mg/l
Bizarb6gtte
P00440
;'
mg/1
+ pH value (fatten analyzed)
P00400
units
Arsenic (D) _
Carbon dioxide
PO1000
P00405
u9/1
mg/l
Chloride (D)
P00940
J
mg/l
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
m9/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/1
.fHardness (as CaCO.1)(D)
P00900
i elk IN
mg/1
Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/1
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/1
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond,
P00094
UMHOS/cm
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
ug/l
Al -Aluminum (D)
P01106
ug/1
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005'
ug/l
Ca -Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/1
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/1
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/l
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/l
Fe -Iron (D)
p01046
ug/l
Hg-Mercury
F71900
ug/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/l
Mg -Magnesium (D)
P00925
mg/1
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
ug/l
Na.-Sodium (D)
P00929
mg/1
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/l
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
mg/1
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
BOD
P00310
mg/l
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal NY)
P31616
/100ml
Coli£orm (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mQ/T
Other Analyses:
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab

1p,
COUNTY t,'':,. N. C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
QUAD No. "V SERIAL NO. '� '�< & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REPORT T0: (circle one) C ���. ®F OD A�GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
ARO, WSRO, ;,MRO; FRO, WaRO,N. 'Dn�a�'3�L®'F;lv1�7'�
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO, ,0NjE' � V '
OTHER COM1�2
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution m-018r,7o%eX!* It o_- zf `-
DATE COLLECTED 1 a� (S % Time Location or site
C.IHWPu t,+
Description of sampling pointz I,
r; ems, ,•' i t r" , J ;r
(pumping time,.air temp, etc,)
Field Analysis By: 4,Lat. �- ✓ ✓ Long, �• I -
pH Spec. Cond, Temp, oC
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
mg/1
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
P71830
mg/l
Carbonate
P00445
mg/l
Bitarbotra'te
P00440
mg/l
pH value fwaen analyzed)
P00400
units
Arsenic CD)
PO1000
u9/1
Carbon dioxide `
P00405
mg/l
Chloride jD)
P00940
mg/l
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/l
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/1
Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
mg/1
Hardness Cnon-carbonate)(D)
P00902
m9/1
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/l
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/l
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond,
P00094
UNHOS/cm
l
LAB NUMBER
i!
DATE REC'D
REC'D BY
J�
DATA ENTRY BY,,
CK. i s
DATA REPORTED
/ %Cl.r �fRt(
_Sampled interval'
r.
dor I G % =. Appearance Taste
Ag-Silver (D)
P010.75
ug/l
vpl-Aluminum (D)
P01106
� �}.ug/1
C-Ba-Barium (D)
PO1005
'Jr ug/1
L.Ca-Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/1
i Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
�� ug/1
yCr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/1
t-6-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/1
L,,Fe Iron (D)
P01046
�' �� ug/l
.Hg-Mercury
P71900
ug/l
;,.Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
= k- ug/1
,_Mj�Magnesium (D)
P00925
mg/l
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
ug/1
Na.-Sodium (D)
P00929
�'•: t{ mg/l
t,A-Lead (D)
P01049
�� ?f� ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
-f vi ug/l
K'-Potassium (D)
P00935
9, =' mg/l
BOD P00310 mg/1
COD P00341 me/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
P31616
/100ml
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)•-(D)
P00623
mg/l
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
m¢/1
Other Analyses:
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample J U N 18 1985
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy Lab
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82 GROIIP40 !'LATER SECTICIN
^ALEIGH. II.

COUNTY ",` :: .,-. < ; N. C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
QUAD N0. ��� i SERIAL N0. i� `� r & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
- DEM
REPORT TO: (circle one) GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
ARO, WSRO,,MRO; FRO, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO,
OTHER
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other
� f C;
LAB NUMBER t
DATE REC ' D
REC'D BY
DATA ENTRY BY '.,r,^ y ,� C�JK
DATA REPORTED (1 >
DATE COLLECTED Time By. Location or site i
Description of sampling point la-J-; <: i i.: Sampled interval to
Remarks !Lc,Et /i:L �';(_t%r,
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
Field Analysis By: C ' �- / ,t= Lat. ? 3 7 tL 7T Long.
pH Spec. Cond. Z `7 -- Temp, °C )dor Appearance f" h:rr:c Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 P00410 eo me/l
—Alkalinity., Hydroxide
P71830
mg/l
Carbonate
P00445
mg/l
-B3zarb6n'a'te
P00440
0
C, (3
mg/l
i pH value Cwiyen analyzed)
P00400
units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/1
_
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/l
,,Chloride (D)
P00940
mg/l
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
m9/1
rHa`rdness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
/
J
mg/l
Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
f
mg/I
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/1
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/1
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond,
P00094
UMHOS/em
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
ug/l
Al -Aluminum (D)
P01106
ug/1
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005
ug/1
Ca -Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/1
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/1
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/1
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/l
Fe -Iron (D)
P01046
ug/l
Hg-Mercury
P71900
ug/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/l
Mg -Magnesium (D)
P00925
mg/1
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
ug/l
Na.-Sodium (D)
P00929
mg/l
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/l
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
mg/l
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
BOD
P00310
mg/1
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
1131616
/100ml
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/1
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/1
Other Analyses:
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy Lab

COUNTY ti:-_�,�l�C� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
v A3s� & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
QUAD NO. ' ;J SERIAL NO.
DEM
REPORT T0: (circle one) r� n-d� ,;� GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
ARO,
WiRO,
OTHER
WSRO, (MRO; FRO, WaRO,
RRO, Abi ;kie FO, D4,�
LAB NUMBER f i
DATE REM
REC`D BY
DATA ENTRY] BY' i f'>'r ' CK 1; }
A DATA REPORTED C `
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor. i,,,otery` _.A'e �`t€�ti' �•b`2
i � �11wEL�1i �'� , pp �G11ti41Vhb � ff f i• ,
DATE COLLECTED Byf ! F? %l`r Location or site
u
Description of sampling point Sampled interval l� ?
Remarks
(pumping time, air temp, etc,)
Field Analysis By: ;' �� Lat. ?' `! ! Long, u
pH Spec, Cond. ",' Temp, °C )dor ;f % Fi Appearance !'_•' Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
mg/l
Alkalinity, hydroxide
P71830
mg/1
Carbonate
P00445
mg/l
Birarb6nate
P00440
mg/l
pH value (kitten analyzed)
P00400
units
Arsenic (D)
Carbon dioxide `
P01000
P00405
ug/1
mg/l
Chloride (D)
P00940
mg/l
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/l
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/l
Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
mg/l
Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/l
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/l
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond.
P00094
UNHOS/cm
AS -Silver (D)
P010:75
ug/l
✓A�1-Aluminum (D)
101106
.- "" .irk--1
j.BA-Barium (D)
P01605 `Z- .a�;, ug/l
CA -Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/1
E,Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
` ug/1
i_Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
' <'.� ug/1
r Cii-Copper (D)
P01040
'g/1
i-Fe-Iron (D)
P01046 n'" L'' ug/l
Hg-Mercury
P71900
ug/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
l_`�' ug/l
1,,Mg-Magnesium (D)
P00925
Fri �i mg/1
(Mn`-Manganese (D)
P01056
C, ug/l
;rN"Sodium (D)
P00929
3ii C mg/1
�Pli-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/l
�.Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
�rf:, ug/l
9K=Potassium (D)
P00935
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
BOD
P00310
mg/1
COD
P00341
m /l
Coliform (Fecal MF)
P31616
/100m1
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Turbidity
P82079
NTbJ
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l-.'
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/1
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/l
Other Analyses:
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy Lab
f+i`•':
; N4
JUN 18 1988
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82 TZl UND t .r ATER SECTION
71ALFICi4. I1.

COUNTY
QUAD NO. / SERIAL NO.
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO, 'MRO;, FRo, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO,
OTHER
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other
LAB NUMBER
! '
DATE REQ1D
REC ' D BY
DATA ENTRY .BY i
-.- CK/" }
DATA REPORTED
DATE COLLECTED Time ;; . n By t n to t a c Location or site C ;i t1 2 r,
Description of sampling point `>- c Sampled interval ,Zr
Remarks _I ! , . i= 2"
(pumping time, air temp,`6`tc.)
Field Analysis By: ;,,. P a ; _, Lat. % v Long, C,' '1 ' r-
pH Spec. Cond. Temp, oC )dor 4? _ Appearance Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
7 Z
mg/1
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
P71830
L I
mg/1
Carbonate
P00445
<
mg/l
Bitarbotra'te
P00440
S IR
mg/l
pH value flatten analyzed)
P00400
'T /
units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/l
_
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/1
Chloride (v)
P00940
/
mg/l
Color (True),
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/l
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/1
Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
R
mg/1
Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/1
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/1.
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond,
P00094
UMHOS/cm,
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Ag=Silver (D) P01075 ug/l
A1=Aluminum (D) P01106 ��^. ug/1_
Ba-Barium (D) P01005 a ug/1
Ca -Calcium (D) P00915 / mg/1
Cd-Cadmium (D) P01025 < ug/1
Cr-Chromium (D) P01030 ug/l
Cu-Copper (D) P01040 ug/l
$e-Iron (D) P01046 G ;'%j(? u g / 1
Hg-Mercury P71900 ug/l
Li -Lithium (D) P01130 ug/l
Mg -Magnesium (D) P00925 j,_t mg/l
Mn-Manganese (D) P01056 I jt ug/l
Na.-Sodium (D) P00929
Pb-Lead (D) P01049 ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D) P01090 ug/1
K-Potassium (D) P00935 `ij"? mg/l
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
BOD
P00310
mg/l
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
1131616
/100ml
Coliform (total MF)
P.31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/1.
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/1
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/l
Other Analyses:
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy Lab FEe 2' ft
GROUfl) ! IATE
)
^ALEIGH. a CTiCi1

COUNTY
QUAD NO. �: ;Y a :7 SERIAL Ig Lj
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO; MR FRO, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO,\Ah6skie FO,
OTHER
N. C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other
DATE COLLECTED , 1 n P r- r1 Time , i ,n r , By i., I I V 4 Location or site 7, R ? :.i ? 0
LAB NUMBER •4:Y 3��
DATE RECIDI " c�, 116
REC 'D BY �' {✓1
DATA ENTRY BY (,1':' i" CK
DATA REPORTED :a ' 18 -&r
Description of sampling point -rr, t- _ Sampled interval ! i!
i
Remarks
Field Analysis By:
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
`h S Long. ='
pH V. r Spec. Cond. : Temp, oC )dor �jPA c Appearance r ±ter„r Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
'
P00410y�m
mg/1
e.
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
P71830
mg/1
L
Carbonate
P00445
'
mg/l
Binarb6nste
P00440
Q� _
mg/1
v-
pH value Noen analyzed)
P00400
�.,
units
~Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/l
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/l
Chloride (v)
P00940
mg/1
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/1
Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
mg/1
(non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/1
,Hardness
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/1
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/l
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond.
P00094
UMHOS/cm
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
ug/l
Al -Aluminum (D)
P01106
ug/1
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005
ug/1
Ca -Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/l
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/1
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/l
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/1
Fe -Iron (D)
P01046
ug/l
Hg-Mercury
P71900
ug/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/l
Mg -Magnesium CD)
P00925
mg/1
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
ug/l
Na,Sodium (D)
P00929
mg/l
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/1
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/1
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
mg/l
BOD
P00310
mt/l
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
P31616
/100ml
Coliform (total MF)
231505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
m9/1
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
m9/1
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mQ/l
Other Analyses:
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
NORTH CAHOLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH,N.C. 27611, PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR EV00C, WG// 7)re
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: �?QC , )A)Pjl
CRoad, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
�VGI)S
2. OWNER 025 1?e,n .
ADDRESS R,0,,1P I
(Street or Route No.)
Al, (',
City or Town
State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED / 9 7 b
USE OF WELL PO L71-LS L i
4. TOTAL DEPTH /so,
CUTTINGS COLLECTED ❑ Yes Z No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING
WELL? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL:
FT. ❑ above TOP OF CASING,
❑ below
TOP OF CASING IS
FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): 10
METHOD OF TEST
8. WATER ZONES (depth):
Unknown
9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount
10. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
From + 1 To Ft.— 3 2e
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
11. GROUT:
From
From
12. SCREEN:
From
From
From
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Material Method
To Ft.
To Ft.
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
_ To Ft. in. in.
_ To Ft. in. in.
_ To Ft, in, in.
Quad_ No. NCI 13 Serial No. o q Ls
Lat. 35 "1 � � Long. 91) Q 5 9'S Pc I
Minor Basin
Basin Code d 3- 0 i- 8 L-
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
County: �,o w Q n
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
If additional space is needed use back of form
LOCATION SKETCH
CShow direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
or other mapreferencepoints) tread 15 A
3
k,3 House,
I
I
rl.
G• Z �i `n' i
Depth Size Material N
M
From To Ft.
From —To— Ft. 1 N
14. REMARKS:yJrnyo.nTOy QW ngrfiod are a 1 u 515 II;di�.�
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
GW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.

ALCHEM, INC.
P.O. BOX 171
ROCKWELL, NORTH CAROLINA 28138
[phone]
S. P'. F. 0.
FEB 17 1.982,
A1.1R. Q. J ALlTY
ETD_[ j
y, February 15, 1982
Mr. Jesse W. Wells
Hydrological Technician
N. C. Department of Natural
Resources & Community Development
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115-0950
Dear 11r. Wells:
As you can see on the enclosed _report, the purpose for the
inspection at our plant in Rockwell appears to have been
garbled on purpose. We would please like to know the
purpose for the water sample being taken.
Thank you for your immediate response.
Very truly yours,
Tandag 0�VWW',d-,
Randall F. Andrews
sj

COUNTY i�`a.✓t�r`'j:
QUAD No. ,' (4p I SERIAL NO. ��- L, Q/0
REPORT TO: (cc1e one)
ARO, WSRO,r' MRO,) FRO, WaROI-
WiRO, RRO, A.hoskie FO,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURC•ES`,
& COMMUNITY,DEVELOPMENT . )
DEM
Groundwater Field/Lab Form
OTHER ,.` ;;. -
PURPOSE: (circle o'ne) bas el ine.5,%1 r.ftlonj monitor,
Date Collected T R Q veet c By(,��'};
Description of sampling point - 4�r f
r
Remarks
Field Analysis By:
pH
BY I
ENTRY BY Y��.:a- �• CK `
REPORTED
l'
Location or site s;;, ��! , ,'�. i %' /i �. j R o 1T..
Sampled interval M1�
J j r, d�'r ' t t. �.�•1r
!�" i l�,Pa'.�.Q ". 'l _.i�f t/� "� •�-•? i� I �/? i 'Y! ,'i/~ i{',�.Li-./'frA'� J.
LAB NUMBER r v 11
C, r^
DATE REC'D I D
rr REC'D
a v»� l2 (h. lC! er\) DATA
/ DATE
(.pumping time, air temp, etc.)
Lat .�> ___Long."y` -- ;
�`C -%s• Taste
• ,` C Odor -? :� �iia i - Appearance
Spec. Cond .� Temp . /i {. o
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
( Z
mg/1
F]Ag-Silver (D)
i,1?
ug/1'
Alkalinity, hydroxide
46
mg/l
aAl-Aluminum (D)
ug/l
Carbonate
41
mg/1
WBa-Barium (D) �i
00 ug/1
Bicarbonate
-) 4o
mg/1
i Ca -Calcium (• IJ'e
pH value (when analyzed)
%
units
�Cd-Cadmium (D)
_1415
ug/l
Arsenic (D)
ug/1
�Cr-Chromium .(D)
0
ug/l
Carbon dioxide
mg/1
; JCu-Co er (D) "z ",j ) ug/1
Chloride (D)
mg/l
'f.
Fe -Iron (D)
Coo,,
u /1
Color (True)
units
FIHg-Mercury
ug/l
0 Cyanide
mg/1
E]Li-Lithium (D)
ugh
Dissolved solids (D)
L (V
mg/1
its Mg-Magnesium.,jD)
Fluoride (D) -',
mg/1
Mn-Manganese (D)
ug/1
Hardness (as CEtCO3) (D)
mg/1
F`�.. Na-Sodium (D)
/, r
mg/1
Hardness (non -carbonate) (D)
mg/1
,, Pb-Lead (D) ` ' /00
ug/1
MBAS (D)
mg/1
/I'
n-Zinc (D)
Phenol .(D)
ug/1
�K-Potassium (D)
: ,l�
mg/l
§' Silica (D)
Sulfate (D)
mg/1
BOD
mg/l
COD
mg/1
Coliform
(Fecal MF)
/100ml
Coliform
(total MF)
/100ml
TOC
mg/1
Turbidity
NTU
❑.''Ammonia
(as Nitrogen) (D)
^- ',; mg/1
Kjeldahl
(as Nitrogen) (D)
mg/l
Nitrate
+ Nitrite (as Nitrogen)
(D) t.1.`,f mg/1
RI Phosphorus, total as P(D)
�1`?� mg/1
r
Other Analyses:
�`�i• �'.�.� •%i E" A' r nl P'!� � lrJl �l �f•-r -•h � w/
UMHOS/ D = DissolVe'& Analysis - submit filtered sample
Specific Cond, cm
Revised 10/1/80 White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab

J l�
^ L
-DI l�ECTI N I
Q O I
Co su SECT I
I�
PALL A-rioN I
o I U1
\ �EIZM ' l
A�w Hejy _\ 15I�sI
Peo — SR Z3Y I
R��enC2 oZ I
J 9 i
M�CombS I
SR 2325
52
52

/1
COUNTY
N. C D P TMEPJT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NUMBER
QUAD NO. 1 =` SERIAL N0..�r �zTc r, KITL CO �1UNITY DEVELOPMENT v =
DATE REC D -)
REPORT T0: (circle one) J' i1TX DAYIr; DEM V_
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM REC'D BY"`
ARO, WSRO, Q0; FRO, WaRO, DATA ENTRY BY �' `SCR
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO, `� ' _ jr.
G+f��
OTHER DATA REPORTED
_ )t
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution mont�to , oth r, zef,"A-n
�i�l� CF �[i�1{tC�. �.�....._ �j
DATE COLLECTED ` ;> % Timeuft.f!gVKU C G�:�� B} `°`C"1 %� Location or site • P �'?
Description of sampling point Sampled interval
Remarks
((pumping time,. air temp, etc,)
Field Analysis By:=f Lat.
PH Spec. Cond. ?l/ Temp, oC )dor �` r�> r Appearance t �: Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 P00410 9 mg/l
Alkalinity, Hydrax9de
P71830
L I mg/l
Carbonate
P00445
41 ig/l
Birarb6rrate
P00440
11 mg/l
PH value (!when analyzed)
P00400
_5._Q) units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/l
_
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/l
Chloride (D)
P00940
7 mg/l
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/l,
Hardness (as CaCO.1)(D)
P00900
25 a mg/l
Hardness (non--carbonate)(D)
P00902
?-f D mg/1
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/1
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond,
P00094
UMHOS/cm
A -Silver (D)
P01075
_
u 1
BOD
P00310
ma/1
V -Aluminum (D)
,<P01106
`/ L !�
.ug/1
COD
P00341
/1
. Ba-Barium (D)
r <_ / 1 /'
�pOj:005 =- / .- � �!'
ug/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
P31616
/100m1
yCa Calcium (D)
P00915
t7- :f-
mg/1_ f ---
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
-Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
= =J
ug/1
TOC
P00680
mg/l
,,,Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
` 6
ug/l
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
uCu Co er (D)
P01040
�'�-
u 1
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
p00612
mg/1
t,Fe-Iron (D)
p01046
017
u 1
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
Hg-Mercury
F71900
ug/1
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
:�; o
ug/l
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
;_*-Magnesium (D)
P00925
!
MR/1
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/l
p3Kn-Manganese (D)
P01056
'r',�x
g/1
Other Analyses:
S-Na.-Sodj.um (D)
P00929
`G' ?
mg/1
t,6-Lead (D)
P01049
/!/?
ug/l
:•Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
i /),'r
ug/1
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
mg/l
D = Dissolved Analysis -
submit filtered sample
MAY 3 1
1985
White copy - Headquarters
Pink copy
- Region
Yellow copy Lab
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82 GROUND VIATER SECTIM
PALEIGH, ff. C, h7

.i
COUNTY�-
�, . .
QUAD NO. L' l 1 `` SERIAL NO. G
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO,QRO', FRO, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO,
OTHER
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other C L;. P1, rr
LAB NUMBER ` ^�_(i z I
DATE REC1D =-
t
REC'D BY 4J
DATA ENTRY BY CK W`
DATA REPORTED 9 1 ?
DATE COLLECTED 5 L` - r Time C; By r �'•` Location or site S. •• J
Description of sampling point ~! 1 Ci r i/ Sampled interval
Remarks e C i<. 4_ c"
;(pumping time;' air temp, etc.)
Field Analysis By: Lat. - Long. �% t
PH Spec, Cond. `� / O Temp,
Lab Analysis
i Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
n�
I
mg/l
:..Alkalinity, Hydroxide
P71830
y !
mg/1
✓Carbonate
P00445
mg/l
- Birarborfa'te
P00440
mg/l
rpH value CWnen analyzed)
P00400 % e—
units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/l
_
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/l
-Chloride (D)
P00940
�^ 6
M911
Color (True) P00080 units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/1
.Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900
mg/l
:,Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
- mg/l
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/l
Phenol (D)
P34466
u9/1
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/l
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/l
Specific Cond,
P00094
UMHOS/cm
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
dor A/ Appearance U, /ri Taste
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
Al -Aluminum (D)
P01106
-� .ug/1
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005
ug/1
Ca -Calcium (D)
P00915
mg/1
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/l
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/1
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
_ ug/1
Fe -Iron (D)
P01046
_ __ dg/1
Hg-Mercury
P71900
ug/l
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/l
Mg -Magnesium (D)
P00925
%�-� _mg/l
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
Na,Sodium (D)
P00929
mg/l
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/l
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
mg/l
HOD
P00310
mg/l
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
1131616
/100ml
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100ml
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Turbidity
P8Y079
NTU
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
Nitrate t Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/l
Phosphorus; total as P (D)
P00666
mg/l
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/1
Other Analyses:
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy Lab

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES �tCC��VEQ
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611 Gu
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM APR 18
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line RomN C11111 4 WLTH DEFT.
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name of� /
System /' / C GC
+ Source of Water:
Address prIT to >e-) Ground ( ) Both
,.
Surface .
(' ) Purchased
ZIP ��.
Source of Sample:
County _ House Tap
Report To:
ROWAN COUNTY HEALTH DEPT.
Address: 3100 OLD CON .nRn ROAQ
SALISBURY, N. C, 28144
ZIP
Collected By: ' _k
Date Collected: Time: /U
Location of Sampling Point:
Remarks: R'+.
( I Well Tap
Type of Sample:
(N<) Raw
( ) Treated
Type of Treatment:
None
( ) Lime
( ) Chlorinated
( ) Soda Ash
( ) Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) Filtered
( ) Water Softener
( ) Alum
( ) Other
Type of Analysis Desired:
PQ Regular Parameters ( ) Both
( ) Optional Parameters"'
Regular Parameters .,.
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
Results
pH
units
mg/I
Arsenic
t_ i
Lead
L a mg/I
Iron
m g/I
Manganese
mg/I
Copper
mg/I
Zinc
mg/i
Calcium
mg/I
Magnesium
v mg/I
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
a mg/I
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/I
Chloride
mg/I
Color
units
Turbidity
S NTU units
Fluoride
mg/I
Date Received
Date Analyzed
DHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10/79
Date Reported Reported By
Laboratory Number
Mildred A. Kerbaugh

n
B
l'
N. C. PT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMI ITY
COUNTY: DEVELUrMENT LAB NUMBER 00008:
RIVER BASIN: t C. DEPT. OF NATIMAL
RIVISION �O uOVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DATE RECIEVED Time
REPORT TO: ARO, FRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO WiRO, WSRO Tea INA'TERr'C 4 --.,""ITY`FIELD-NLAB FORM I DM1) Recd by:
Other From: Bus —Courier ' Other
Shipped b Bus, Courier, Other SAMPLE TYPE DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
COLLECTOR(S): j aAMBIENT .EMERGENCY ❑SPLIT ❑COMPLIANCE DATE REPORTED:
BOD RANGE: SEED:STATION LOCATION' -
CHLORINATED: REMARKS:
Station Number
Date Begin tyy/mm/ddl
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
Sample Type
A H L
T S B
C G GNXX
t - t
r.
11 �-
BOD5 310 m /I
Chloride940 m /I
NH3as N 610 m /I
Ni — Nickel 1067 u /
COD High 340 m /I
Arsenic:Total 100 u /I
TKN as N 625 m /I
Pb— Lead 1051 -� u /
COD:Low 335 mg/l
Chi a: Tri 32217 u /I
NO +NO3 as N 630 m /I
Sb— Antimony 1097 u /I
Coliform:MF Feco131616 /100ml
Chl a: Corr 32209 u /I
PO4 as P 70507 m /I
Se— Seleni m 1147 u /I
Colifor :MF Total 31504 /100ml
Pheo h tin a 32213 u /I
P: Total as P 665 m /I
Zn— Zinc 109 !? u /l
Coliform:Tube Feco131615 /100m1
I
Color: True 80 Pt —Co
P` Dissolved as P 666 m /I
Coliform:Tube Total 31505 /100m1
Chromium: Hex.1032 u /l
A —Silver 1077 u /I
Pesticides Specifically
Residue Total 500 m /I
Cyanide 720 m /I
Al —Aluminum 1105 J /•I
Volatile 505 m /I
Fluoride951 mg'/.I
Be— Ber Iliuml012 u /I
Scan Organochlorine
Fixed 510 m /I
Formaldehyde 71880 m /I
Ca— Calcium 916 '_ m /I
Scan Or anophos horus
Residue:$ ended 530 m /I
lGrease and Oils 556 m /I
Cd— Cadmium 1027 u /
Volatile 535 m /I
Hardness:Tota1900 m /I
rCo—Cobalt
1037 ' u /I
Organics Specifically
Fixed 540 m /I
MBAS 38260 m /I
Chromium:Total 1034 Ll u /1
H403 units
Phenols 32730 u /I
lCu—Coocier 1042 u /I
Scan Base / Neutral Extractables
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 m /I
Sulfate 945 m /I
f
Fe— Iron 1045 u /I
Scan Acid Extractables
Acidity to PH 8 3 435 mg/I
Sulfide 745 m /I
H—Mercur 900 u /I
2
_
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 m /l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm
Li — Lithium 1132 u /I
Special Analysis Specifically
—Alkalinity
to PH 4 5 410 m /I
2
Biomass: Dry Wt. 573 g/M
M —Magnesium 927 ° ~ m /I
2
TOC 8 _ m /I
Biomass: Peri Ash Free 572 g/M
Imn—Manganese 1055 U9 /I
Scan Acid Herbicides
2
Turbidity 76 NTU
I
lChl a: Peri Fluro 82547 mg/M
Na—Sodium 929 m /I
Scan Pur eables
Sampling Point
Water Temperature(°C)
D.O.
pH
Conductance
Alkalinity
Acidity
PT
at 25`C
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
PH 4.5 pH 8.3
63 2
10
300
400
94
82244 431
82243 82242
Secchi(Meters)
Air Temperature ('C)
D.O.%Saturation
Salinity%
Algae; Floating Mats
Precipitation(in/Day)
Cloud Cover;%
Wind Direction(Deg.)
Wind Force
Severity
Beaufort
78
20
301
1480
1325
45
32
36
37
1 Hr. Settleable
Matter(ml/IIHr.)
Dead FishTurbidity
Severity
Odor;Atmosp ere
Stream Flow
Detergent Su s
Oil -Grease
Floating Debris
Sludge Severity
Severity
Severity
11330 I
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
50086
1340
1350
351
11305 11300
11345
11315
DMl/Revised IU/04

/ a - 30
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
POST OFFICE BOX 950
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT OF Complaint Investigation: Alchem Inc
PLACE VISITED Alchem Inc. Rockwell
DATE Report Date •
ADDRESS P. 0. Box 171 Rockwell
.0d jD(`C7
BY WHOM Mr. Monty Payne, Ms. Tana Fryer, Mr. Rex
Gleason, Mr. Jesse Wells
RIVER BASIN Yadkin
TIME SPENT
PERSONS CONTACTED Mr. Randall Andrews, Mr. Keith Andrews, Co -Owners
REASON FOR VISIT Complaint Investigation
COPIES TO: Iowan County Health Department
Jesse Wells
REPORT: On November 15, 1984, this Office received a complaint concerning runoff
from Alchem, Inc. The complaint was.about.material stockpiled at the site running
off onto adjoining property and washing into a nearby stream as a result of rainfall
runoff.
On November 30, 1984, Mr. Monty Payne of this Office investigated. The
investigator observed where rain water and spillage entered a makeshift catch basin,
from which it had overflowed onto adjacent property. Mr. Keith Andrews, Co-owner,
was contacted at this time and he explained how an excessive amount of rain fall had
caused the basin to overflow,.and they (Alchem) were planning to recycle the water
in the basin back to the plant, remove the contaminated soil in the field and build
a larger basin to prevent future runoff.
Mr. Andrews also explained that the material stored behind the plant was
their raw ,product, aluminum hydrate. Which they combined with concentrated sulfric
acid to made a high grade alum. The aluminum hydrate in. the contaminated soil and
rainwater could be used in their process after some of the impurities were removed.
Checking the pH with litmus paper before collecting samples, the investigator
found that the pH was not greater than 2.0 standard units at the catch basin and in

Page Two
the adjacent field where the runoff had accumulated. The metals sample obtained
at the same locations showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron, sodium and zinc.
The stream below Alchem was checked by Mr. Payne at the bridge on SR 2340, but
nothing abnormal was observed, although the metals sample taken did show a slightly
elevated contentration of aluminum and iron.
On December 6, 1984, this Office received a complaint from the City of
Rockwell's maintenance department concerning,a white coloration to an unnamed
tributary to Second Creek. On December 7, 1984, Mr. Payne investigated. He found
no discoloration to the creek, but the sample obtained did show a'high
concentration of aluminum.
On January 2, 1985, Mr. Jesse Wells, of this Office, and Mr. Payne returned
to the Alchem area.to sample wells at adjacent residences for possible contamination.
Neither of the wells sampled showed contamination but a stream sample obtained
showed very high concentrations of aluminum, iron, zinc and manganese. On
January 7, 1985, stream samples were again obtained and again they showed extremely
high concentrations of aluminum, iron and zinc.
During the time of mid December through early January, the stream bottom
became covered with a dirty -white floc. This floc appeared to start where a small
underground spring, or tributary, entered the creek. It is believed that this spring
or tributary was contaminated from material leaching through the soil at Alchem.
On February 28, 1985, stream samples were again obtained and they also showed
high levels of aluminum, iron and manganese in the.creek.
On March 26, 1985, this Office received another complaint from a resident in
the Alchem area about possible well water contamination. The complainant was
concerned about his/her well water being contaminated because it had a brownish
color, bad taste, and left a residue on anything that was exposed to continuous
water contact.
The following day, March 27, Ms. Tana Fryer,.of this Office, and Mr. Payne'
investigated. Because of the excessive amount of disturbance in this area the
(the area was being cleared and the brush burned) the investigators did not find
the runoff complained about, for they were under the impression that the runoff
had just occurred. But on a return investigation oh April 1, 1985, they found the
runoff complained about, which appeared to have occurred sometime before the complaint.
Soil and well water samples were taken at the complainants residence during
these visits. The soil samples showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron
and magnesium; the well water sample showed high concentrations of aluminum and
manganese. Stream samples were also taken. The samples upstream of the small
underground tributary did not show the high concentrations of aluminum, iron,
manganese, iron and zinc as the downstream sample did.
The final, discovery from these visits, was a path that the runoff had followed
toward the stream. Although the path stopped 100-150 ft.-from the stream, it
was still very pronounced.
Stream samples obtained on June 11, 1985, showed a high concentration of
aluminum, iron and manganese downstream of the small tributary. Upstream of the
tributary these concentrations were higher than expected, but nowhere near the
level of the downstream sample. Bioassay samples were also taken at this time.

Page Three
The downstream sample had a LC50 of 27%;,the upstream sample had a LC50 of
zero, no toxicity. The Aquatic Toxicology Group who performs bioassay testing for
the State, reported that what appeared to kill the test organisms was a low pH.
In July more stream samples were obtained, The tributary was again used
as the dividing point to separate upstream and downstream. Next the stream
was vertically divided into an upper and lower zone, providing four areas to
consider. The top zones, both upstream and downstream, showed no problems with metal
concentrations or pH, but the bottom zones showed a vast difference. The upstream
bottom zone showed a high concentration of aluminum, iron and zinc, but no pH
problem. The downstream bottom zone showed high concentrations of aluminum, iron
chromium, copper, manganese and zinc; it also had a low pH.
On August,8, 1985, a meeting was held at Alchem, Inc. with Mr. Randall
Andrews, Co-owner of Alchem Inc., Mr. Richard Doby and Mr. Mack Henderson of
Solid & Hazardous Waste, Mr. Jesse Wells, Mr. Rex Gleason and Mr. Monty Payne
of the Division of Environmental Management. The meeting dealt with what
impact Alchem was having on the environment and a walk through the plant.
During the tour, the pH was taken at several points and a pH below 2.0 units was
found at several points, which classified the material as hazardous. Therefore,
the clean-up of this facility comes .under the jurisdiction of Solid & Hazardous Waste.
On September 9, 1985, another meeting was held, in Raleigh, with Representatives
from Alchem, Solid & Hazardous Waste and this Department to determine what actions
need to be taken for the clean-up. It was determined that the ponds need to be
emptied and the contaminated soil be removed and if the lagoon was continued to be
used it had to be lined. Secondly the contaminated soil has to be neutralized or
removed. Thirdly, the contaminated,well would have to be cleaned or a new well
put in. Last, there was an excessive amount of spillage throughout the plant
which had to be controlled.
Summary: The samples obtained over the year show that an excessive amount of aluminum
and possibly sulfric acid has escaped from the facility,,which has apparently caused
surface and ground water contamination. Alchem has begun clean-up procedures in
conjunction with Solid & Hazardous Waste and Division of Environmental Management.
They have removed some of the soil around -the contaminated well and replaced this
well. They have also submitted an application for a non -discharge permit to
construct an addit&onal storage lagoon, which is being evaluated by this Office.
This Office will keep abreast of the clean-up at Alchem until it is completed.

1
I1'
NORTH CAROLINr, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
WELL I ECORd GROUND WATER DIVISION RO -
P. 0. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, N. C. 27611
DRILLING CONTRACTOR K t3p1Y1, polls Well DX!jJ1 ixia CC). REG. NO. WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO.
I. WELL LOCATION,: (S o ketch Me,joca(ipn q� baet�o form
Nearest Town: _ ttQ('8 N1DX'T,Ll Ci&l°O.R Ina.-���g
Off Crescent Road. Quadrangle
County: �n �--
No. 611,
l 5 ,t
Q 5 2 ? `%
DELLING LOG
FORMATION DESCRIPTION
2 OWNER. 1S6t�i� I R Lt ® ommumty or Sub ivision and Lot No.
3. ADDRESS: Pa 0. Pax 171., Rockwell., N. Ca
4. TOPOGRAPHY: drams2LQ8 , valley, slope, hilltop, flap
5. USE OF WELL: Pliant DATE: 9-15-83
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? No
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 265' RIG TYPE OR METHOD: Air Rot
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: AYES No. of Bogs
9. CASING: Inside Wall thick.
or
Depth rrqq Di_ Wei ht/ft. Type
yy��
From 0 to m ft. —
-- 1 alir-
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 0 1. 20 ft QI(t1 Q i v hand
11. SCREEN: Depth Diem. Type and Opening
From to ft.
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From to ff.
13. WATER 20NES(depih):
PTH
M
O
151
Rel A
Brown 03.$ a
Sand. Rock.
3-5 t
301
30 t
1001
100t
327g
Soft Rock,,
Mi_ ed G y—Lk-jaite� c
1271
26t
& Z5 z/
.35 33 IQ
S C: SHD
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 35 ft. above top of casing.
below
Casing is �- ft. above land surface. ELEV.
DATE MEASURED: September 15th, 1983
15. YIELD(gpm): 15 METHOD OF TESTING: Ai'
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft. after hours
at gpm.
17. CHLORINATION: Type Rt 2 Tablet&mount Mablets
18. WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(°F)
19. PERMANENT PUMP:(Show a sketch of well head on back of form)
Date installed Type Make
Capacity (gpm) HP
Intake Depth Airline Depth
20., , HAVE YOU INFORMED THE WELL OWNER OF THE
DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS? Ycs
21. REMARKS:
I do hereby certify that this -well. record is true and exact.
�,icNAT� CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
� f

r ` r
•: t L ,
r
t -
- � I
?n-
.'--e---- ���� � .-dam. � -. �____-_ , - _-----_•___ _. __ '.-- - � - -- --- .__--__ - _
+���gyppppg :q, " � • ...1 ._ '1.,
qC � �EF�? -••I `,p . t:•11 t:"`; 12i T �J � t ✓r � - -
--. � ��� � g .� �, r � ety°� �F � _t � Y -__-_ _ _—. _ - _ _ ♦. p�"P qi..n �x"�a �� .[;} t� "1.'�
• `Y ` 4 �.J � 23 j
• Wp
r
i

ip
NORI H CAROLIN,': DEPARTMENT OF NAT URAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
Ro '411 f
1Py,EL L RECORD GROUND WATER DIVISION
P. 0. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, N. C. 27611
DRILLING CONTRACTOR KannaUolis Well Drill' g CO REG. NO. 33
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO-
1-
WELL LOCATION: (Stoq, a a�re1ch ..ppii tho��,pcat'gqn oA bock ,��(( form},
HOCKwe11 1VOr�CI li&Y'OliTL381 8
County: � �
Nearest Torn:
—btantie
Off Crescent Road
Quadrangle No. 61
A1cheffi 6 ° mmunity or Subdivision an of No.
oareNER: �
2.
ADDRESS: P ° 0 e Box 171, Rockwell, N ° C °
DRILLINg LOG
3•
28138
4.
TOPOGRAPHY: dram, valloy, slope, hilltop, flat
FROM
TO
I FORMATION DESCRIPTION
5.
USE OF WELL: Cam Plant DATE: 9-17-81
0
401
Red Dir
6.
DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? NO
401
3-101
Sand P=k°
345 t RIG TYPE OR METHOD: Air Rotary
110 t
1351
Soft Rock.
7.
TOTAL DEPTH:
8.
FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: =YES No. of Bags
135 t
345 t
Grey Granite.
9.
CASING; Inside Wall thick.
or
Depth D' m. we t/ftt/ft. TT
j9§!
_
`j
�
From 0 to 135 ft. °` 8'11—""�4 °
_
10.
GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 0 to 20 ft 1-2 ement by head
i
/ZIY_7,
11.
SCREEN: Depth Diam. Tape and Opening
From to ft.
12.
GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From to ft.
13.
WATER ZONES(depth):
ie, LVNIII,-
i1w
14.
above
STATIC WATER LEVEL:30ft. top of casing.
—tie
14
lov
Casing is ft. above land surtoce. ELEV.
DATE MEASURED: September 17, 1981
Y'
15.
YIELD(gpm): 3 METHOD OF TESTING: Air
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft. after hours
at g pm.
17.
CHLORINATION: Type HTH Tablets Amount 15 Tablets
IS.
WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(°F)
19.
PERMANENT PUMP:(Show a sketch of well head on back of form)
Date installed typo Make
Capacity (gpm) HP
Intake Depth Airline Depth„�z•,
20.
HAVE YOU INFORMED THE WELL OWNER OF THE
DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS? Yes
21.
REMARKS:
I do hereby certify that this well record is tr a and exact.
.00 IGNATURE CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE

(r V rY7 0 ?(

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURZES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEW0IT -- GROL40WATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH,N.C. 27611. h [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Quad. Nr
Lat. Long.
Minor Bat. -
Basin Com
Header'Er.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A%Q
Serial No.
Pc
GW_1 Ertt.
DRILLING CONTRACTORk`•%f� U�� f D ``1
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER 1 ✓
STATE WELL C13t��TRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER_
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
PO
�+ � �
Nearest Town:/ � ! %(K= '
Count y=
11dEC/�
Depth DRILLING LOG
(Road, CommmuJnity,, Subdivision and of No.)
From To Formation Description
2. OWNER �7�-f-T 1`L7�ll�
ADDRESS
( treat or Rout@•.No.)_
/
- <�. II/V olfL ��✓%tolhi
City or Town State Zip Code
r
3. DATE DRILLED /�-�� _S �� USE OF WELL 1216L,
4. TOTAL DEPTH . SCUTTINGS El Yes lam! No
,C-O�LLLLECTED
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? LJ Yes El
"�
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: �_ FT. above TOP OF CASING,
If [td'below
TOP OF CASING IS IS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): f` METHOD OF TEST�'`i�-
IAN 15 I4
�°
8. WATER ZONES (depth): 7 -�� /_/:
9. CHLORINATION: Type �f�• �. s� Amount
10. CASING: Wall Thickness
If additional sD- — s needed use back of form.
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
From To Ft.
--,=70N SKETCH
(Show directi4L and ^_ =-r_e from at least two State Roads,
From To Ft. or other map
From To Ft.
11. GROUT:
Depth Material Method
From Q To P 0 Ft. -
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
From
Fr3m
From
13. GRAVEL PACK:
From
From
14. REMARKS:
Depth Diameter
To Ft.
_ To Ft.
_ To Ft.
Depth Size
To Ft.
To Ft.
Slot Size Material
in. in.
in. in.
in. in.
Material
I
�r
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED I, CCORDANCE WITF -C 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD-qAS BEEN PR�OrP TO THE WELL OVA''=
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT UA I E
.. ,___.. __. _.__i .,, n:.......... ..I C.........m•,nr- _ -. _.monT -i rnnv to WPII nwner-

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH,N.C. 27611, PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Quad. No.- / 1 a Serial No. fro 4V77
Lat. 35 33 53 Long. Bo Q5 19 Pc _ I
Minor Basin
Basin Code 03 07 o `i-
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR T �k NoneVCwt�
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Wockwe.Il County: 96a]a1�
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER 145, Coro%po M�l,ernf�5
ADDRESS P• O • BOX 430
n I (Street or Route No.)
lSro-n'tTe uarrV N.0 a8672
City or ow\n ! State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED 1971 (7) USE OF WELL DOrnes+k-
4. TOTAL DEPTH 17 CUTTINGS COLLECTED ❑ Yes 2 No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? ❑ Yes 2 No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: FT. ❑ above TOP OF CASING,
❑ below
TOP OF CASING IS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
8. WATER ZONES (depth):
9. CHLORINATION: Type
10. CASING:
Amount
Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
From To —Ft. — ? SI,,-, e
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
11. GROUT
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
If additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
or other map reference points) VeadEna
T
I
Depth
Material Method
From
To
Ft:
From
To
Ft.
N
�o
12. SCREEN:
7
IM
N
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
IV-
From
To
Ft.
in. in.
From
To
Ft.
in. in.
m
— —
®sR — I
❑
From
To
Ft.
in. in.
Z'0.r6,„
p1b
wlhouse
{ O•I
13. GRAVEL PACK:
�
I
Depth
Size Material
sty a3a5
From
To
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
,
14. REMARKS: w.I>1Ven%arye�?w
.tsar+to85
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
GW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.

c
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WELL RECORD DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
BZ/ /
P.. (qo z7687 — .B.ALEIGH, N.C. 276�J, 19-733-2020 /
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Air rl i ng o .REG. NO. MY WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO.
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Salisbury
County: Rowan
Quadrangle No.
/V 6
(Road,Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER:Pi ckl er Well (Efri d)
DRILLING LOG
3. ADDRESS: Rt . ) f S al i sbury, N.C.
DEPTH
FROM TO
FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley,slope,hilltop,flat(circlleone)
5. USE OF WELL: j]omsst1C DATE: 5-1.6-84
0 129'
Dirt
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? no
129' 205'
Ro ck
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 20 5' RIG TYPE OR METHOD: ai r
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NO
55
9. CASING: Depth Inside
Dia.
From 0 to 129ft 64
10. GROUT: Depth Materia
Method 0M
Wall thick. typei
or weight/ft.
jAN•:.
From--Q_to2_ft Grout Pn>>rar3
..�n �.IATGQ CEC91C{�
If addition, s e e -D ck oo of rm
11.
SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
PALE1G A, fl. G
From to ft
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
12.
GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
52
From to ft
D
r C..
tAPtiAGfM
13.
WATER ZONES (depth) : 20 2'
l`GFi1thTAL
OfwSlon w r,r N
14.
above
STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft. top of casing
below
A R�1 B ,7
(s `,y
Casing is ft. above land surface ELEV:
15.
YIELD(gpm): 20 METHOD OF TESTING: air
"E
Fail _
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
after hours at gpm'
SR 2325 .Wi nyljiC/OI NAT'6 0.3
AND
17.
CHLORINATION: Type RTH Amount
Z?�r-OTjr^CEIS
18.
WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(OF)
19.
PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed
�.;1,�•� y "` _�
Type Capacity (gpm)HP
Make Intake Depth
b 5
Airline Depth
_-; i:_-•.,t:
20.
HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDEDe A COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? S
21.
REMARKS Wlir)SD - Ou) �U l'o,r,0le.k Al l'he��
�nV G4�lly
I do hereby certify that th s w 1 was co structed ac6ordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and StandarA :id ( at this�r 7�,�recor is _true and exact.
—f C....a_.............. AA-.­e..,o.,, —A ., n., rn WWII nw

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WELL RECORD DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT L/O
P.� (Qo �7687 — J�ALEIGH, N.C. 276+# �i &19-733-2020 T J
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Air ri ing G O • MEG. NO. WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO.
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Salisbury County: Rowan
Quadrangle No. /Y 1o/ / 6
(Road,Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: Plykl pr 'Well ( Efri d ) DRILLING LOG
3. ADDRESS : Rt . 5 . S al i Sbury , N.C. DEPTH
FROM TO FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley,slope,hilltop,flat(circle one)
S. USE OF WELL: nnmastic DATE: 5-16-84 0 129' Dirt
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? no 129' 205' Rock
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 20 1 RIG TYPE OR METHOD: ai r t/
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NO 55
a 33
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wall thick. type
Dia, or weight/ft.
From 0 to 129ft 6 G alv .
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From-0--to20ft11�rniit Poured
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
From to ft
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From to ft
13. WATER ZONES(depth): 20 2'
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft. above of casing
below
Casing is ft. above land surface ELEV:
15. YIELD (gpm): 20 METHOD OF TESTING: air
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
after hours at gpm.
17. CHLORINATION: Type HTH Amount
18. WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(OP)
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed
Type Capacity (gpm)HP
Make Intake Depth
Airline Depth
if additional space is needed, use back of form
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
t\[ED.
91v1siDrt OP CNv1�ONMit
5rz zs way Rd
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIQ$De COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? yy
21. REMARKS WIinsD • Du) vU. Al-Phe,,,, :nJ ica�tly�
I do hereby certify that th s w was c structed actordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standarpjh d at this
,/recor irue and exact.
r_w-i Ra„ c" in/i /Rn I Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH,N.C. 27611. PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Quad. No. A / i V Serial No.'RO 4,-gi
Lat. 35 .33 5/8 Long.96 25 18 pc
Minor Basin
Basin Code 03 67 64
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR jUnf171? —JoGob-S
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Showsketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: 9-0e-1//jP H
S. R. a3*1
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER /M5_PhiriGI0. Pe ole-
ADDRESS 1lOu/L e / Box 911 il
RoC'kwe? // (Street or Route C. 1.28/39
City or Town State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED 1977 USE -OF WELL 26MESTIG
4. TOTAL DEPTH N9 CUTTINGS COLLECTED ❑ Yes ❑✓ No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? ❑ Yes ® No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: FT. ❑ above TOP OF CASING,
❑ below
TOP OF CASING IS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
8. WATER ZONES (depth):
9. CHLORINATION: Type
Amount
10. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Depth
Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
From +— To 'q9- Ft.a�" fi�L
From
To
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
11. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
From
To —Ft.
-
From
To
Ft.
12. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
From
To
Ft. in. in.
From
To
Ft. in. in.
From
To
Ft. in. in.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
From
To
Ft.
County:
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
If additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
or other map reference points)
,) I
( 1
I
I o ;GIs 'a
❑
bc
h
S.R. 232
From To Ft. ,
14. REMARKS:-W1ihveniorl jrpt^nrr,pla�hl InyFSfidG�617 t ��J
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED'IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
GW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.

COUNTY
'9
N.
C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LAB NUMBER
13
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
t
QUAD NO, l,ii i SERIAL No.
r�, U4Q�
EM
DATE RECID
J
REPORT T0: (circle one)
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
REC�D BY
ARO, WSRO, 4{t0,} FRO, WaRO,
r�
DATA ENTRY BY (r�� .) CK
WiRO, RRO, Ahoskie FO,
OTHER
DATA REPORTED
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other
`ist-
DATE COLLECTED
Time /, 'C_
By ). %, J: Location or site
<^ 41J 2 t
Description of sampling point -?,._,
h .;. ` r 1., o
-
Sampled interval
Remarks
- i a :_
-' 'f
A 4.. 'i,- • f . _.
(pumping time,- air-teimpP etc.)-
17 _F'y�,v
.-_.
Field Analysis By: ; 15:y
Lat.
�" Long. CAL 1)"�z
v L
pH (_ r Spec. Cond.
47 r-, Temp,
oC )dor
Appearance !„ .,
Taste
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
_.3
mg/l
l-
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
y
Carbonate
P71830
P00445
�41
mg/1
mg/1
JBir'arboTr Te
P00440
�'.-, /
mg/1
�pH value Niten analyzed)
P00400
r,-.
units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/1
Carbon dioxide `
P00405
mg/1
Chloride (D)
P00940
mg/1
A_
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/1
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301.
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/l
Hardness (as CaCO3)(D)
P00900+?
mg/1
yHardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/1
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
u9/1
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/1
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/1
Specific Cond.
P00094
UMHOS/cm
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
ug/l
Al -Aluminum (D)
P01106
QO O ug/1
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005
ug/1
Ca -Calcium (D)
F00915
9, q mg/1
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/1
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/1
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/1
Fe -Iron (D)
F01046
oZ O t3 ug/1
Hg-Mercury
1171900
ug/1
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/1
Mg --Magnesium (D)
P00925
�.8 mg/1
Mn-Manganese (D)
P01056
So ug/1
Na.-Sodium (D)
P00929
5. 2- mg/l
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
ug/1
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/1
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
•70 mg/1
HOD
P00310
MR/1
COD
P00341
/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
1331616
/100m1
Coliform (total MF)
P31505
/100m1
TOC
P00680
m9/1
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Ammonia (as,Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/1
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/1
Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
mg/1
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
MR/1
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter P70304 m12/1
Other Analyses:
D = Dissolved Analysis - submit filtered sample
White copy - Headquarters Pink copy - Region Yellow copy - Lab

COUNTY
QUAD NO. k! r- � SERIAL NO. D- t i,,I 'Z 7
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO,/MRO; FRO, WaRO,
WiRO, RRO, Ahesskie FO,
OTHER
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF.NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNIT`( DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
DATE COLLECTED j ? i <, : Time a 1 By i . „> t'+c Location or site i:: 7
LAB NUMBER ( �"
DATE REC'D ! '
REC1D BY
DATA ENTRY Y % CK
DATA REPORTED
Description of sampling point -C:Sampled interval
Remarks - r„ „ _ i . ! t_ , t
(pumping time, air temp, etc.')'
Field Analysis By: ; c Lat. "i' i L ? _ Long. %' I G % i� 1 `,✓ "
pH r; Spec. Cond.
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
P00410
mg/l
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
P71830
mg/l
Carbonate
P00445
mg/l
Birarboifate
P00440
mg/l
pH value Mien analyzed)
P00400
units
Arsenic (D)
P01000
ug/l
_
Carbon dioxide
P00405
mg/l
Chloride (D)
P00940
mg/1
Color (True)
P00080
units
Cyanide
P00720
mg/l
Dissolved solids (D)
P70301
mg/1
Fluoride (D)
P00951
mg/l
Hardness (as CaCO,)(D)
P00900
mg/l
Hardness (non-carbonate)(D)
P00902
mg/l
MBAS (D)
P38260
mg/1
Phenol (D)
P34466
ug/_l
Silica (D)
P00955
mg/l
Sulfate (D)
P00946
mg/l
Specific Cond.
P00094
UMHOS/cm
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
oC )dor — A .'I-- Appearance ''h -r-j Taste
Ag-Silver (D)
P01075
ug/1
BOD
P00310
MR/1
•.A1-Aluminum (D)
P01106
= udl
COD
P00341
m /l
Ba-Barium (D)
P01005
ug/1
Coliform (Fecal MF)
1131616
/100ml
Ca -Calcium (D)
P00915
" mg/l
Coli£orm (total NO
B31505
/100ml
Cd-Cadmium (D)
P01025
ug/l
TOC
P00680
mg/l
Cr-Chromium (D)
P01030
ug/1
Turbidity
P82079
NTU
Cu-Copper (D)
P01040
ug/1
Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
P00612
mg/l
Fe -Iron (D)
P01046 �,�(�
Kjeldahl (as Nitrogen)'(D)
P00623
mg/l
�T
/�
Hg-Mercury
P71900
ugVl�
Nitrate t Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D)
P00631
m /l
g
Li -Lithium (D)
P01130
ug/l
_
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
P00666
mg/1
Mg -Magnesium (D)
P00925
/
7 < mg/1 _^
Dissolved Solids - cond. meter
P70304
mg/l
(D)
P01056
Jr(% /�
.Other Analyses:
�Mn-Pianganese
Na.-Sodium (D)
P00929
��
Y
Pb-Lead (D)
P01049
,
ug/l
Zn-Zinc (D)
P01090
ug/l
K-Potassium (D)
P00935
17%1mg/1
IV
FE®
7
D = Dissolved Analysis -
submit filtered sample
White copy - Headquarters
Pink copy - Region
Yellow copy Lab
GROUND WATER SECTICI t
PACEIGH, ft. C.

NKDATA ALERT - RESPONSE DATE 05/03/85
ACTION > INQ FILE > ALERT-R%P85 P%WD > FORMAT > NRALERTR NEXT RCD > 00173
NRT90 ENTERED THIS DATA, RECORD IS NO 00172 FRD DATA
EMERGENCY: CHEMICAL STOCKPILE RUN-OFF
LOCATION: ALCHEM, INC., LOCATED OFF %R 2323 NEAR ROCKWELL IN ROWAN COUNTY
PREPED BY: JE%%E W. WELLS
DATE OF INCIDENT: UNKNOWN EMR REC: 223 RESPONSE DATE: 5/3/85
NARRATIVE OF INCIDENT: INCIDENT OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY i YEAR AGO. ON i/2/85
JE%%E WELLS OF THE G.W. SECTION ACCOMPANIED MONTY PAYNE OF THE W.Q. SECTION
CONCERNING THE POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION OF AN U.T. OF SECOND CREEK AND TWO WELLS
FROM CHEMICAL RUN-OFF FROM ALCHEM' INC. THE COMPANY REPORTEDLY %TOCKPILE%
ALUMINUM HYDRATE ON SITE. NUMEROUS CITIZENS HAD COMPLAINED CONCERNING THE
SMALL STREAM AND WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR WELLS. TWO WELLS WERE SAMPLED
BUT THE RESULTS INDICATED NO CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION. STREAM SAMPLES COLLECTED
INDICATED HIGH LEVELS OF AL, FE, ZN, MN. ON 3/27/85, MR. PAYNE RECEIVED A
COMPLAINT FROM ANOTHER CITIZEN CONCERNING CHEMICAL RUN-OFF AND POSSIBLE WELL
CONTAMINATION. MR. PAYNE COLLECTED A SAMPLE FROM THE COMPLAINANT'S WELL.
RESULTS INDICATED 10,000 UG/L AL' 14,000 UG/LMN. MR. WELLS VISITED THE
COMPLAINANT 5/2/85, THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT CHEMICALS HAD RUN OFF THE
ALCHEM PROPERTY APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AGO WITHIN 40 FEET OF THE WELL. THE
COMPLAINANT SAID SHE BEGAN NOTICING A STRANGE TASTE TO THE WATER. THE
COMPLAINANT APPROACHED ALCHEM' INC. CONCERNING THE RUN-OFF. THE COMPANY
HAS SINCE CONSTRUCTED'A BERM TO PREVENT THE RUN-OFF FROM LEAVING THEIR
(CONTINUED)
NKDATA ALERT - RESPONSE DATE 05/03/85
ACTION > INQ FILE > ALERT-R%P85 P%WD > FORMAT > NRALERTR NEXT RCD > 00174
NRT90 ENTERED THIS DATA, RECORD IS NO 00173 FRD DATA
EMERGENCY: CHEMICAL STOCKPILE RUN-OFF
LOCATION: ALCHEM' INC., ROWAN COUNTY
PREPED BY: JE%%E W. WELLS
DATE OF INCIDENT: UNKNOWN EMR REC: 223 RESPONSE DATE: 5/3/85
NARRATIVE OF INCIDENT: (CONTINUED)
PROPERTY. THE COMPLAINANT HAS SINCE TIED ON TO A NEIGHBOR`% WATER SUPPLY.
THE COMPLAINANT'S CONTAMINATED WELL IS A 24 INCH DIAMETER BORED WELL, 49
FEET TOTAL DEPTH. MR. WELLS COLLECTED ANOTHER WATER SAMPLE FOR METALS.
CONSTITUENTS TEST IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE INDICATED A PH OF 5.3' SPECIFIC
CONDUCTANCE - 00. INVESTIGATION IS CONTINUING ON THIS MODERATE INCIDENT.

Control Number
County Number
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
Source Name
OWNERSHIP
0Private
Source Address
C
To. 171
Z
2 Municipal
✓
3 County
4 State
Cit
County
F
Region
- LI< w '_//
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/Operator
ffe;ik AnJre ws
71' Quad Name
Multiple Source Site
County Source N's
YES NO
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
Ol Facility
1 Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesel
1 Lagoon, etc.
1 Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2 Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 Agricultural
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
O Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
4 Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4 River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
0Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5 Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
�6 Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 Sewer system
6 Intentional dump
7 Other
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7 Spill
8 Leachate
8 Injection well
8 Leak --above ground
9 Other solids
9 Disposal well
9 Leak --underground
0 In use
10 Gas
WASTE:
STATUS OF SOURCE: 2 Inactive
11 Pest/herbicides
3 Other
12 Fertilizers
Alurn/nuM
POLLUTION STATUS AND
CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED:
Yes No
OConfirmed 0 Rank
1 NPDES
6 Mining
2 Potential 2 Tabulate
No:
2 DEM Nondischarge
No:
7 Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No:
No:
No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction
8 Solid Waste (Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No:
No:
4 Status unknown
4 Capacity Use
9 Oil Terminal Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No:
No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC
0 Air Quality
ID.
No:
No:
2 Surface Impoundment (SIA)
ID:
Comments Susred inf�Hm (an bT^ q/uminurn M dr4fe.
,
in subsur'�e.
a� u,'i: of Se,.-nJ C,,k
3 6W Pollution Source Inv.
Date:
4 Other OEM investigation,
Date: - 4 -
Compiler:
Date:

0.
G R O U N D 1-1 A T E R P O L L U T I O N S O U R C E E V A L U A T I O N
R A N K I NG CP,I TEP.IA
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
Q3 Violations documented or highly probable
2 Default
1 Violations unlikely
ExtQent of Groundwater Contamination
xt
3) Mappable, migrating plume
2 Default
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
0 Default
1 Not considered a serious problem
FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial Action
0 Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
1 No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
ODefault
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
0 Default
1 No expected impacts on people or business
Number of PeoDle at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $1.0,000 loss
0 Default
1 No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong DEM concern over threat to people
02 Default
1 No threat to people or economy
FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassify Croundwater
3 Groundwater should be relassified RS or GC
0 Default
1 No reclass..nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of Reclassification
3 One of top reclassification priorities
20 Default
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
O2 Mod value
1 Low or Pone value
(Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
G
Default
1 Not -of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
O2 Default
1 Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name: ak [ _, —a-ac .
Control Number:
County: 1146
,�cWa 11
Ranker:
Date:

4P
Incident
2 Tabulate only
0 L L U T'E 0 N I PWIC', I D, E hN T
REPORTILA G'FOR M
inhouse Use Only
TYPE OF ACTION
Al1 Emergency response 3 Compliance investigation 5 Routine inventory 7 Re-evaluation:
2 Remedial action O Complaint investigation 6 Fish kill 8 Other:
POTENTIAL HAZARDS: (D ;Pi-c chemicals 2 Radioactivity 3 Air emissions 4 Explosives 5 Fire
LJ
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT
F-incident
E3
Name
TYPE INCIDENT
3 Major
(D Moderate
Inhouse contact for this Incident Telephone
,TP_,5se_LA/. , WC115 rNf PAYN E W.
1 Minor
f
Department Division Section Region
Al R C P I F_NV. MGNT _7 G. w W. Q j_ Moo -e-SVILLE-
PERSON REPORTING INCIDENT
LOCATION OF INCIDENT
Street Address, Road City/Town County
5._R.__ 23-47— )�ockwelf I "Row,,- k-)
Draw Sketch of Area
0
0 <� - -15
D
Z341
0
1
(n
1-5;
1-
_S9 Z321-
POO w0_6-?P5"A.
5z
i
BR
P06R WELL
,-Date
Incident Occurred Time Incident Occurred 7�' Quad Name
I I
La ti tude
I
Longitude
I
It77
360 33 oo
1 goo 25 00
RECON04ENDED ACTION
1 investigation complete
(DInitiate/complete cleanup 5
Technical SuPpor,
7 Enforcement action
2 Continue investigation
4
Lr Long-term remedial action 6
Drill crew
(DMonitoring plan
Eei'"�
Comments
� k).O'n yn ", �7 n 71 in L/4 r-n ^ /)/Io rn'.7 0/1 <,=z /0
Ind,, 4pr
IC? i 1-17 /_/'Q P1 V /0 / 0 /* Q 05
LAB SA.XPLEES: (3'f,1 2 N. (at-ach lab sneets) I S' nature
(TIOAlu'.

Incident *'
POLLUTION INCIDENT REPORTING FORM
Linty--sCoj: 'RO&JRN -Page 2.
--
- POLLUTANTS INVOLVED
MATERIALS INVOLVED AMOUNT STORED
� �uml r)tj H U8fly 2 inner wn
JF�' S")- Uric AclAl- (54orew-4b v rour���anks
, a known /osses)
AMOUNT LOST
un(nown
� Amount Infiltrating Land
REPORTABLE QUANTITY: 111 Yes 2 No 3 Unknown
WATERS EFFECTED: lO Yes
I
FISH KILL: 1 Yes 20 No
IMPACT ONE StRFACE WATERS
Distance to Stream (ft)
2 No 3 Potentially
Name of'Stream
�yT o-_ 5econd ('ree,
RISK ASSESSMENT
Use these codes: High = 3 Low = 1 Default = 2 None = 0
AMOUNT RECOVERED
un knbw rn
n water Iga
Unknown = ?
tream Class
HUMAN HEALTH: I Inhalation (breathing) 1, Absorption (touching) Ingestion (eating)
jI COMMUNITY: I Population density 3 Drinking water a Property
I
ENVIRONMENT: a Sensitive areas a Wildlife a Fish
Sources of Information
HI RESOURCE THREAT GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER AIR
Probability of violations
3_
3 a
i
Overall regional concern
3
2 2
�
Remedial action priority
3
2
Extent of contamination
i
Seriousness of threat
�_
a a
i
Need to designate RS
�
Q_ a
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF POLLUTION
SOURCE OF POTENTIAL
POLLUTION
TYPE OF POLLUTANT
1
intentional discharge
9
Dredge spoil
0 Pesticide/herbicide
2
Pit, pond, lagoon
10
Septic tank
1 Radioactive waste
3
Leak --underground
11
Sewer line
2 Gasoline/diesel
j 4
Spray irrigation
12
Stockpile
3 Sewage/septage
5
Land application
13
Landfill
O4 Other chemical
i 6
Nonpoint source
14
Bypass
5 Other organic
' 7
Animal feedlot
15
Spill
6 Fertilizers
8
Source unknown
16
Well
7 Solid waste
8 Other oil
MULTIPLE SOURCES AT SITE:
1 Yes (DNo
9 Sludge
LOCATION
SETTING
OFacility
1
Residential
2
Railroad
2
Industrial
3
Waterway
3
Urban
4
Pipeline
4o
Rural
5
Dumpsite
6
Highway
7
Other
POLLUTION CONFIRMED: 0 Yes 2 No

1 Incident r
�!!!� County: -O a.rl POLLUTION INCIDENT REPORTING FORM Page 3.
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
Responsible Party/Names
5 e Tne. Z MR. /43—A
Adrew5
Telephone
-70Y 271
Comp ny
Alce hem 2nC, .
Street Address'
5, R • z32
City
-Roc kwew
County
/lowarn
State
N•c.
Zip Code
M39'
J
SOURCE IN USE
0 N/A
Ol Yes
2 No
SOURCE ON SIA LIST
0 N/A
1 Yes #:
0 No
PERMIT TYPE
OO N/A
1 Nondischarge
2 Oil terminal
3 Landfill
4 Mining
5 NPDES
6 RCRA
7 Air
OWNERSHIP
0 N/A
1 Municipal
2 Military
3 Unknown
04 Private
5 Federal
6 County
7 State
OPERATION TYPE
0 N/A
1 Public Service
2 Agricultural
3 Other Source
4 Educational
5 Industrial
@6 Commercial
7 Mining
SOURCE PERMITTED
1 Yes
No
SOURCE ON ERRIS LIST
1 Yes
No
Permit Number
ERRIS Number
INITIAL SITUATION
--
-
r
REASON FOR INCIDENT
1 Transportation accident
2 Mechanical failure
3 Facility design
4O Inventory only
5 Human error
6 Vandalism
7 Unknown
Describe Any Injuries
-
People/Agencies On -site
People/Agencies Enroute
ETA
Detailed Explanation of Incident
Containment/Cleanup Actions Taken
off " o 5 been 19a
le I u a r?_
Direction Wind From
Wind Speed
,{ir perature
Tem
Precipitation
Weather/Precipitation
Nearest Populated Buildines-=Type
Distance to Buildings;

SOIL TYPES
LANDFORM
COASTAL PLAIN REGION PIEDMONT SOIL REGION
1 Middle Coastal Plain ,10 Felsic Crystalline
1 River/coastal terrace
2 Upper Coastal Plain/Piedmont 1.1 Carolina Slate Belt
2 Coastal (flat) plain
3 Sandhills 12 Triassic Basin
3 Mountain ridge
4 Lower Coasatal/Wicomico, Talbot i3' Mixed Felsic and Mafic
4 Sandhills
5 Lower Coastal Plain/Pamlico
MOUNTAIN SOIL REGION
5- Swamp
6 Linear (valley) slope
6 Organic Soil
7 Brackish and Freshwater Marsh 14 Low and Intermediate Mountain
7 Head slope (concave)
15 Basins/Terraces/Flood Plain
8 Nose slope (convex)
8 Outer Banks
9 Large River Valleys/Flood Plain 16 High"Mountain
Foot slope
10 Barri-er island
OBSERVED AVERAGE GRADIENTS
ESTIMATED DEPTHS
11 Barrier system
12 Beach ridge
To nearest water supply: rJ %
To uppermost confining bed: Rio ` 50ft•
13 Tidal marsh
Water -table gradient: 2- 5 %
To water table: c O _ it-
14 Floodplain
To nearest stream: J` %
To bedrock: (o0 %D ft•
15 Upland: 0-5% slide
(interstream divide)
Stream gradient: a - 5 %
ESTIMATE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES
AQUIFER USE
1 Little or no use
Soil
Unsaturated zone
Water table
Upper confined aquifer
1 high
1 high
1 high
1 high
Moderate uses
(D medium
(D medium
2O medium
inedium
3 Heavily used
3 low
3 low
3 low
3 low
4 unknown
4 unknown
4 unknown
4 unknown
DISTANCE TO NEAREST WATER, SUPPLY: a S O ft. DISTANCE TO NEAREST BUILDING: of sC7 ft.
Describe general lithology of soil and unsaturated zone
92-
'5 a2n rat )) khQW--A 0,S
c�rnt 2re.�e1� t pe� s��iP so � I i s dee.o ('ec� ar br�c,.�r�
anti rC�%►ve,l a {ec�i
�C .
�1�1a�er � e. is
So,1 (Ae r,% C.® - 7O -�e�� riee
es% a�ec� c a- 11 o fee+
Provide map showing: 1) Pollutant sourcQ 2} Threatened water supplies 3) Direction of overland flow

Page 4
INCIDENT REPORTING FORM --Notifications
Agency
Telephone Time Contact
Spill Response Center -OEM
[phone]*
Water Supply-DHR
[phone]
Solid/Hazardous Waste-DHR
[phone]
Regional Office
Emergency Mngt.-CC&PS
[phone]
Pesticides -DOA
[phone]
Inland Fisheries-WRC
[phone]
Wildlife Resources Commission
[phone]*
Marine Fisheries
[phone]
Radiation Protection-DHR
[phone]
EPA -Atlanta
[phone]*
Coast Guard -Wilmington
[phone]
Coast Guard -Hampton Roads
[phone]
National Response Center
[phone]*
(your supervisor)
(PIO)
(shipper)
(carrier)
Sol
r_k 16 V
CHEMTREC
[phone]*
N. C. Poison Center
[phone]*
-Explosives problems-SBI
[phone]*
State Warning Point-SHP
[phone]*
(emergencies only)
[phone]*
EPA-PCB.problems
[phone] __

S = I I, I I,' 1 li. 61 J t..,a-- ,'l .
Page 3
INCIDENT REPORTING FORM
RESPONSIBILITY: Local _
State Federal
Responsible party
ON -SCENE COORDINATOR:
name
phone number
agency/EOC location
EOC contacts
EOC phone
Assumed, date: time:
Relinquished,
date:
time:.
On -site representatives:
By
Agency
Date
Time
Verification
i
TECHNICAL COORDINATOR:
name
p one number
agencylocation
con ac s
EX phone
Assumed, date: time:
Relinquished,
date:
time:
On -site representatives:
By
Agency
Date
Time
Verification
RESOURCE TRUSTEE:
name
phone number
agency/EOC location
EOC contacts
EOC phone
Assumed, date: time:
Relinquished,
date:
time:
On -site representatives:
By
Agency
Date
Time
Veri f i cati on
PIO:
'name
agency
phone number.
Assumed, date: time:
Relinquished,
date:
time:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Rowan County
3100 OLD CONCORD ROAD ♦ DIAL 633-0411
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA 28144
April 24, 1985
HEREERT L. HAWLEY, M.P.H.
DIRECTOR
Mrs. Patricia Poole
Rt. 1, Box 944
Rockwell, NC 28138
Dear Mrs. Poole:
On March 29, 1985 water samples were collected at your home
for bacteriological and chemical analyses. Enclosed are copies
of the completed analyses along with a list of recommended limits
for drinking water and a receipt for the $2.00 fee which you paid
at the time.
The results of the analyses show your well to be heavily
contaminated with coliform bacteria. The analyses also indicates
your water supply exceeds the recommended limits in several other
categories.
It is my opinion that water from this well is unsafe for con-
sumption and that the well should be properly abandoned.
If you have questions regarding the possible hazards of continued
use, I would suggest that you consult with your physician.
Please contact me if I can be of additional service.
Sincerely,
Jimmie R. Seagle
Sanitarian
JRS/sh

State Laboratory of Public Health
Division of Health Services, N.C. Dept. of Human Resources
P.O. Box 28047 — 306 N. Wilmington St., Raleigh, N C. 27611 — 8047
DRINKING WATER DESCRIPTION BLANK -FILLED IN BY SENDER s
COLIFORM ANALYSIS -:PRIVATE SUPPLY I
Name of Owner or Tenant
! 100, y`ijU County{.. UW A h/
Type of Sampling Point c9-Q I
C II d B ", DATE I- 1 4 Y TIME �� . AM
o ecte y /
Source: Well( VI Spring ( ) Other:
Signed �Q
By. Name
Indicate: M.D. or Sanirta�Q
Address
MF5F^rED — - -
JUL 30f%j
BACTERIOLOGIC ANALYSIS
Media Positive Tubes
LTB 1 2 3 4 (5
BGB 1 2 3 40
C 0 L I F 0 R M BACTERIA
Not
Fou d Present MPN
r
J13L 3 1 -
.3URW 0004CORD ROAD
city CALISWRY, -144. t. 28144 Zip'•
DHS Form 1294
Rev. 7/79 Lab:-:: ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE GIVEN.
Do not write on this side of form.
Stafa Laboratoryof Public Health l ""'
"' "" " "
' BACTERaOLOGIC.ANALYSIS
Media
Positive Tubes
Division of Health Services, N.C. Dept. of Human ReS�6u,,rces
_
�� �'1
P.O. Box 28047 — 306 N. Wilmington St., Raleigh, N.C%7611'
LTB
1 2 3 4 5
DRINKING WATER DESCRIPTION BLANK- FILLED IN BY SENDER .
COLI FORM ANALYSIS-.PRIVAT-E SUPPLY '
BGB
1 2 3 4 5
' ti Or%IX
C 0 L I F 0 R M BACTERIA
caner of Tenant ' d/T/ /
C
'County
Not
AeL
.�.>>
Aa
`Type of Sampling Point h / P Ce e
Found Present MPN
REPORTED
M
`(�- DATE-��TIME /O pM
Collected By
APR lye
Source: Well-() Spring ( ) Other:
Ri=C' I V E D
Signed ;
By: Name
Indicate: M.D. r Sanitarian
ROWAN COUNTY HEALTH DEPT.
Address 310
A SALISBURY, N. C. 28144
City Z!p._.,_....-,,-.
DHS Form 1294
-
Rev. 7/79 Lab. ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE GIVEN.
Do not write on this side of form.
_
a

HKDATA ALERT --EMERGENCY DATE 05/03/85
ACTION > INQ FILE > ALERT-EMR85 PSWD > FORMAT > NRALERTE NEXT RCD > 00224
NRT90 ENTERED THIS DATA, RECORD IS NO 00223 FRD DATA
EMERGENCY: CHEMICAL STOCKPILE RUN-OFF
LOCATION: ALCHEM, INC., LOCATED OFF SR 2323
COUNTY: ROWAN
TIME NOTIFIED: 2:i5PM-1i/15/84 PERSON NOTIFIED: MONTY PAYNE
DATE OF INCIDENT: UNKNOWN DATE INVESTIGATED: 1/2/85
INVESTIGATED BY NAME/DIV/OTHER AGENCY: MONTY PAYNE, JESSE WELLS, DEM
DESCRIPTION OF EMERGENCY: RUN-OFF MAY HAVE CONTAMINATED SURFACE 6 GROUND
WATERS
CAUSE (IF KNOWN):
CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN/PLANNED: UNSURE AS OF YET, BUT SOME TYPE OF
CLEAN-UP OPERATION
STATE CONTACT: RON MC MILLAN LOCATION: MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
PHONE: [phone]