Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0081825_Inspection_20110629ArA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman - Governor Director Secretary June 29, 2011 Walter Edwards, Mayor Town of Ansonville PO Box 106 Ansonville NC 280070106, SUBJECT: June 22, 2011 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Town of Ansonville 4 Ansonville WWTP Permit No: NC0081825 Anson County Dear Mr. Edwards: Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on June 22, 2011. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Trent Allen of the Fayetteville Regional Office. As noted in past inspections, the treatment plant is in dire need of repairs and painting. It was observed during the inspection that metal portions of the treatment plant had deteriorated completely or needed cleaning and painting: The plant needs to be evaluated for structural integrity, safety for plant personnel, and the continued treatment of the wastewater. You are asked to complete a plan of action to address these issues and respond back to the Fayetteville Regional Office within 30 days of receipt of this letter. As a reminder, preservation of the Waters of the State can only be achieved through consistent NPDES Permit compliance. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any questions, please call me at 910-433-3300 . Sincerely, Trent Allen Environmental Engineer.. Surface Water Protection Section Fayetteville Regional Office Location: 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301 Phone (910) 433-3300\FAX: 910-486-07071Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Nne orthCarolina Naturally An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA. Washington, D.C. 20460 Water Compliance Inspection Report Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection 1 I NI 2 151 31 NC0081825 111 121 11/06/22 1 17 Type Inspector FacType 181 CI 191 SI 20� 1I Remarks 211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --------Reserved---------- 671 169 701 1 7111 721N1 731174 75I 1 I I I I I 180 1 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include POTW name and NPDES permit Number) Ansonville WWTP NCSR 1627 Ansonville NC 28007 Entry Time/Date 10:30 AM 11/06/22 Permit Effective Date 09/12/01 Exit Time/Date 02:30 PM 11/06/22 Permit Expiration Date 14/01/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) /// Other Facility Data / Name, Address of Responsible OfficiaUTitle/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Daniel Lane Wilson,PO Box 106 Ansonville NC 280070106//704-826-8404/ No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement • Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review • Compliance Schedules Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s)_of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Mark Brantley /, ( 6 ,4; FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.727/ it - 3 i✓ - I I Trent Allen v,ie FRO WQ//910-433-3300/ . el;e Signature of Management Q A Reviewer _ Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers �JDate iBelinda S Henson....4f ii.eYLJ P) FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.726/ / -1 - `I . EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page # 1 31 NPDES NCO081825 • yr/mo/day . Inspection Type 111 121 11/06/22 117 181 C1 (cont.) 1 Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Laboratory data was reviewed for the month of January 2011 at it appeared to be correct as reported on the DMR. The effluent flow meter was last calibrated on March 2011. The effluent appeared to be very clear at the time of the inspection. As noted in past inspection, the treatment plant is in dire need of repairs and painting. It was observed during the inspection that metal portions of the treatment plant had deteriorated completely or needed cleaning and painting. The plant needs to be evaluated for structural integrity,saftey for plant personnel, and the continued treatment of wastewater. Page # 2 w Permit: NC0081825 Owner - Facility: Ansonville WWTP Inspection Date: 06/22/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Compliance Schedules Yes No NA NE Is there a compliance•schedule for this facility? n n • Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period? ■ n ❑ n Comment: Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • n n n Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ n n n Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? n n , ■ n Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ n n n # Are there any special conditions for the permit? - n n ■ n Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • n n n Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? , ■ n n n Comment: Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? ■ n n n Is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ n n n Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? ■ n n n Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • n n ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? ■ n n n Dates, times and location of sampling n Name of individual performing the sampling n Results of analysis and calibration n Dates of analysis n Name of person performing analyses n Transported COCs n Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ■ n n n Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ■ n n n (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Fin. n Page # 3 Permit: NC0081825 Owner - Facility: Ansonville WWTP Inspection Date: 06/22/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is the ORC visitation log available and current? ■ n n n Is the•ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • n ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • ❑ n 11 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • ❑ ❑ n Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? • ❑ n n Comment: Flow Measurement = Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? • n n n Is flow meter calibrated annually? • n ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? • n n n (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ -n • ❑ - Comment: Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mixing adequate? - ❑ n ❑ • Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • n n # Is the odor acceptable? ■ n n n # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Comment: Pump Station - Effluent "Yes No NA NE Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? • n El ❑ Are all pumps present? ■ n n n Are all pumps operable? • n n n Are float controls operable? • n ❑ ❑ Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? / ❑ n • 11 Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • n n fl Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? n n • n Page # 4 4. Permit: NC0081825 Owner - Facility: Ansonville WWTP Inspection Date: 06/22/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Are weirs level? Is the site free of weir blockage? Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? Is scum removal adequate? Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? Is the drive unit operational? Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth) Comment: Aeration Basins Mode of operation Type of aeration system Is the basin free of dead spots? Are surface aerators and mixers operational? Are the diffusers operational? Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? Is the DO level acceptable? Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) Comment: De -chlorination Type of system ? Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? Is storage appropriate for cylinders? # Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? Comment: Are the tablets the proper size and type? Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn n n.n ■ nnn ■ nnn n nn■ Yes No NA NE ■ nnn n nn■ ■ nnn ■ n n.n ■ nnn nnn■ nnn■ Yes No NA NE Tablet nnn■ ■ nnn ■•nnn -■nnn ■ nnn Page # 5 Permit: NC0081825 Owner - Facility: Ansonville WWTP Inspection Date: 06/22/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation De -chlorination Number of tubes in use? Comment: Laboratory Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? # Is the facility using a contract lab? , # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? Comment: Disinfection -Tablet Are tablet chlorinators operational? Are the tablets the proper size and type? Number of tubes in use? Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? Comment: Yes No NA NE 3 Yes No NA NE ■ rinn ■ nnn ■ nnn nnn■ n nn■ n nn■ Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn 3 n nn■ ■ nnn n nn■ Page # 6