NC0087556_Fact Sheet_20210104

FACT SHEET FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS
This form must be completed by Permit Writers for all expedited permits which do not require
full Fact Sheets. Expedited permits are generally simple 100% domestics (e.g., schools, mobile
home parks, etc) that can be administratively renewed with minor changes, but can include
facilities with more complex issues (Special Conditions, 303(d) listed water, toxicity testing,
instream monitoring, compliance concerns).
Basic Information for Expedited Permit Renewals
Permit Writer / Date
Brianna Young 1 /4/2021
Permit Number
NCO087556
Facility Name / Facility Class
Led estone Subdivision WWTP / W W-2
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
French Broad / 04-03-02
Receiving Stream / HUC
Cane Creek / 060101050701
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
C; Tr / 6-57- 1
Does permit need Daily Maximum NH3
limits?
Monitoring with no limits already present
Does permit need TRC limits/language?
Already resent
Does permit have toxicity testing? IWC (%) if
so
No
Does permit have Special Conditions?
No
Does permit have instream monitoring?
No
Is the stream impaired on 303 d list)?
No
Any obvious compliance concerns?
See Section 2
Any permit mods since last ermit?
None
New expiration date
12/31/2025
Comments on Draft Permit?
Yes — See Section 5
Section 1. Facility Overview:
The Ledgestone Subdivision WWTP operates a WWTP with a permitted wastewater
discharge of 0.027 MGD. Treatment consists of an extended aeration basin, chlorine
contact basin, and dechlorination. The facility generates a continuous discharge.
Section 2. Compliance History (August 2015 — October 2020):
• 1 NOV for BOD daily max exceedance
• 2 CPAs for BOD frequency violations
• 2 NOVs for TRC frequency violations
• 2 CPAs for fecal coliform frequency violations
• 2 NOVs for flow frequency violations
• 2 NOVs for pH frequency violations
• 2 CPAs for TSS frequency violations
• 2 NOVs for late/missing DMRs

Section 3. Chanl4es from previous permit to draft:
• Updated eDMR footnote inA(1) and language in A(2)
• Updated outfall map
• Added facility grade in A(1)
• Updated language on the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet
• Added instreammonitoring for fecal coliform with associated footnote in A(1)
per ARO request (concerns about levels in the creek)
Section 4. Changes from draft to final:
• Deadline of 30 days added for instream sampling location approval in A(1) per
ARO request
• Outfall map and coordinates updated based on ARO comments
Section 5. Comments received on draft permit:
• Linda Wiggs (ARO; via email 11/9/2020): The map in that draft is incorrect, see
attached for correct location. The map in the draft is showing where the Tyco
discharge is located, not the Ledgestone. There are several dischargers close to
each other in this short stretch of the river. Note: my terrain navigator is used as a
working document, so ignore the bit of the coordinates you see at the top of the
image. I don't like the way the components read, but I see it is because James and
James did a poor job of filling out the renewal application for their client
Ledgestone; and again they put the subdivision as the operation firm instead of
J&J. Whatever, doubt it is worth the effort to get them to correct it. I do not need
to approve all of these U/D; I think you can put the standard language in there for
U/D.... isn't it something like —100 feet upstream and —200 feet downstream of
the discharge pipe is fine with me.
o DWR response: If I'm seeing this correctly, you're saying the discharge
needs to be moved slightly further north than where it is at right now? Do
you have the accurate outfall coordinates? I based the map off of what was
in BIMS, so if those are wrong we need to make sure the correct ones are
in there. Concerning the components, I didn't change those at all (that is
what was listed in the previous permit). Does something here need to
change? And for the U/D, if there are discharges so close together, would
100ft/200ft not be impacted by other discharges?
o Linda Wiggs response (via email 11/17/2020): Topographic map with
coordinates sent. I just don't like that there are no clarifiers listed, but it
can be assumed with an extended aeration system there are clarifiers. The
next downstream outfall is —700' away.
• Linda Wiggs (ARO; via call 11/18/2020): Can a deadline be added for approving
instream sampling locations? Also, it is fine to keep the footnote as is.
o DWR response: A deadline of 30 days will be added. The rest of the
language about instream approval will remain the same.

NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards — Freshwater
Standards
The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard (WQS) Triennial Review was approved by
the NC Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The
US EPA subsequently approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016, with some
exceptions. Therefore, metal limits in draft permits out to public notice after April 6,
2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards - as approved.
Table 1. NC Dissolved Metals Water Quality Standards/Aquatic Life Protection
Parameter
Acute FW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic FW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Acute SW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic SW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Arsenic
340
150
69
36
Beryllium
65
6.5
---
---
Cadmium
Calculation
Calculation
40
8.8
Chromium III
Calculation
Calculation
---
---
Chromium VI
16
11
1100
50
Copper
Calculation
Calculation
4.8
3.1
Lead
Calculation
Calculation
210
8.1
Nickel
Calculation
Calculation
74
8.2
Silver
Calculation
0.06
1.9
0.1
Zinc
Calculation
Calculation
90
81
Table 1 Notes:
1. FW= Freshwater, SW= Saltwater
2. Calculation = Hardness dependent standard
3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form.
Aquatic life standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total
Recoverable Metals due to bioaccumulative concerns (as are all human health
standards for all metals). It is still necessary to evaluate total recoverable aquatic
life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC 213.0200 (e.g., arsenic at 10
µg/l for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at 1.8 mg/L for
aquatic life protection).
Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness -Dependent Metals
The Water Effects Ratio (WER) is equal to one unless determined otherwise
under 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph (11)(d)
Metal
NC Dissolved Standard, µg/1
Cadmium,Acute
WER*{1.136672-[lnhardness](0.041838)] e^{0.9151 [ln hardness]-3.1485}
Cadmium, Acute Trout waters
WER* {1.136672-[ln hardness](0.041838)] e^{0.9151 [ln hardness]-3.6236}
Cadmium,Chronic
WER* {1.101672-[ln hardness](0.041838)] e^{0.7998[ln hardness]-4.4451 }
Chromium III, Acute
WER*0.316 e^{0.8190[lnhardness]+3.7256}
Chromium III, Chronic
WER*0.860 e^{o.8190[lnhardness]+0.6848}

Copper, Acute
WER*0.960 e^10.9422[ln hardness]-1.7001
Copper, Chronic
WER*0.960 e^10.8545[ln hardness]-1.7021
Lead, Acute
WER* 11.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)) • e^11.273 [In hardness]-1.4601
Lead, Chronic
WER*11.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)) • e^11.273[In hardness]-4.705}
Nickel, Acute
WER*0.998 • e^10.8460[ln hardness]+2.2551
Nickel, Chronic
WER*0.997 • e^10.8460[ln hardness]+0.05841
Silver, Acute
WER*0.85 • e^11.72[ln hardness]-6.591
Silver, Chronic
Not applicable
Zinc, Acute
WER*0.978 e^10.8473[ln hardness]+0.8841
Zinc, Chronic
WER*0.986 e^10.8473[ln hardness]+0.8841
General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards.
However, application of the dissolved and hardness -dependent standards requires
additional consideration in order to establish the numeric standard for each metal of
concern of each individual discharge.
The hardness -based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream
(upstream) hardness and so must be calculated case -by -case for each discharge.
Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR
122.45(c). The discharge -specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total
values for use in the RPA calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values
developed for each metal (more on that below), but it is also possible to consider case -
specific translators developed in accordance with established methodology.
RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness -Dependent Metals - Freshwater
The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each
metal of concern, based on recent effluent data, and calculate the allowable effluent
concentrations, based on applicable standards and the critical low -flow values for the
receiving stream.
If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or
acute), the discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard, which warrants a
permit limit in most cases. If monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the
pollutant is not present (i.e. consistently below detection level), then the Division may
remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit.
1. To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness -dependent metals the Permit
Writer compiles the following information:

• Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q 10 (the spreadsheet
automatically calculates the IQ 10 using the formula IQ 10 = 0.843
(s7Q 10, CfS) 0.993
• Effluent hardness and upstream hardness, site -specific data is preferred
• Permitted flow
• Receiving stream classification
2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness -dependent metal of
concern and for each individual discharge, the Permit Writer must first determine
what effluent and instream (upstream) hardness values to use in the equations.
The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test
results for any hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional
data is available for instream hardness values, upstream of the discharge.
If no hardness data is available, the permit writer may choose to do an initial
evaluation using a default hardness of 25 mg/L (CaCO3 or (Ca + Mg)).
Minimum and maximum limits on the hardness value used for water quality
calculations are 25 mg/L and 400 mg/L, respectively.
If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness -dependent metal
showing reasonable potential, the permit writer contacts the Permittee and
requests 5 site -specific effluent and upstream hardness samples over a period of
one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data.
The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as
follows:
Combined Hardness (chronic)
_ (Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness, mg/L) x (s7Q 10, cfs *Avg. Upstream
Hardness, mjg/L)
(Permitted Flow, cfs + s7Q 10, cfs)
The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the IQ 10
flow.
3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a
total recoverable metal, using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients (DPCs) or
site -specific translators, if any have been developed using federally approved
methodology.

EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved" converts the
value for dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal
at in -stream ambient conditions. This factor is calculated using the linear
partition coefficients found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for
Calculating a Total Recoverable Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion
(EPA 823-B-96-007, June 1996) and the equation:
Cdiss = 1
Ctotal 1 + { [Kpo] [SS(l+a)] [10-6] }
Where:
ss = in -stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1], minimum of 10 mg/L
used, and
Kpo and a = constants that express the equilibrium relationship between
dissolved and adsorbed forms of metals. A list of constants used for each
hardness -dependent metal can also be found in the RPA program under a
4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition
coefficient (or site -specific translator) to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at
ambient conditions.
In some cases, where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist
(ie. silver), the dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by
the EPA conversion factor to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient
conditions. This method presumes that the metal is dissolved to the same extent as
it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more information on
conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document.
5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total
allowable concentration (permit limits) for each pollutant using the following
equation:
Ca = (s7Q 10 + Qw)(Cwgs) — (s7Q 10) (Cb)
Qw
Where: Ca = allowable effluent concentration (µg/L or mg/L)
Cwqs = NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria (µg/L or mg/L)
Cb = background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants except NH3*
(µg/L or mg/L)
Qw = permitted effluent flow (cfs, match s7Q 10)
s7Q 10 = summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity
and human health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from
noncarcinogens (cfs)
* Discussions are on -going with EPA on how best to address background
concentrations
Flows other than s7Q 10 may be incorporated as applicable:
IQ 10 = used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity

QA = used in the equation to protect human health through the
consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from carcinogens
30Q2 = used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality
6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each
pollutant of concern. Data entered must have been taken within four and one-half
years prior to the date of the permit application (40 CFR 122.21). The RPA
spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper concentration of each pollutant.
The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total allowable
concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max
exceeds the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations, the discharge is
considered to show reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard, and
a permit limit (Total allowable concentration) is included in the permit in
accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support Document for Water Quality -
Based Toxics Control published in 1991.
7. When appropriate, permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules
in accordance with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10, 2007 from James
Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on 40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements.
8. The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent
chromium and hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards. As a cost savings
measure, total chromium data results may be used as a conservative surrogate in
cases where there are no analytical results based on chromium III or VI. In these
cases, the projected maximum concentration (95th %) for total chromium will be
compared against water quality standards for chromium III and chromium VI.
9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the
discharge, are inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness -
dependent metals to ensure the accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more
robust hardness dataset.
10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this
permit included:
Parameter
Value
Comments (Data Source)
Average Effluent Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
[Total as, CaCO3 or (Ca+Mg)]
Average Upstream Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
[Total as, CaCO3 or (Ca+Mg)]
7Q 10 summer (cfs)
N/A
No RPA necessary
1 Q 10 (cfs)
N/A
No RPA necessary
Permitted Flow MGD
N/A
No RPA necessary

CITIZEN=TIMES
November 14, 2020
0004464730
ap V pljoyo .z'
..... ....... C
PART OF THE USA TODAY NETWORK
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Before the undersigned,a Notary Public, duly commissioned, qualified and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared said legal clerk,
who, being first duly swam, deposes and says: that he/she is the Legal
Clerk of The Asheville Citizen -Times, engaged in publication of a
newspaper known as The Asheville Citizen -Times, published, issued, and
entered as first class mail in the City of Asheville, in Buncombe County and
Slate of North Carolina; that he/she is authorized to make this affidavit and
sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of
which is attached here to, was published in The Asheville Citizen -Times on
the following date(s) 11/14120. And that the said newspaper in which said
notice, paper, document or legal advertisement was published was, at the
time of each and every publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statues of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of
Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
AASigned this 16th of November, 2020 ,
Legal Clerk
Sworn to and su scribed before the 16th of November, 2020
Notary Public o Sfate of N4sconsin, County of wn
My Commission expires.
[phone] I [phone] FAX
14 O. HENRY AVE. I P.O. BOX 2090 ( ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 1 [phone]

Young, Brianna A
From: Wiggs, Linda
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:29 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Subject: RE: Ledgestone Permit
Attachments: OTEEN.J PG
Is this sufficient.
D.EQ'kz��
IQ
Ywfifti
From: Young, Brianna A
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:19 AM
To: Wiggs, Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Ledgestone Permit
Z-11 0 3
Environmental Senior- Spec ialislDivisio
North aroli a Department ofEn-vironn
- -45 (Office)
Linda. wiggs.de r. ov
If I'm seeing this correctly, you're saying the discharge needs to be moved slightly further north than where it is at
right now? Do you have the accurate outfall coordinates? I based the map off of what was in BIMS, so if those are
wrong we need to make sure the correct ones are in there.
Brianna Young, MS
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources
Office: 919-707-3619
Brian na.Young(a ncdenr.gov (e-mail preferred during State of Emergency)
Mailing address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Physical address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle
your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this
challenging time.
From: Wiggs, Linda <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2020 2:12 PM
To: Young, Brianna A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Ledgestone Permit
Hi Brianna,
The map in that draft is incorrect, see attached for correct location. The map in the draft is showing where the Tyco
discharge is located, not the Ledgestone. There are several dischargers close to each other in this short stretch of
the river. Note: my terrain navigator is used as a working document, so ignore the bit of the coordinates you see at
the top of the image.
I don't like the way the components read, but I see it is because James and James did a poorjob of filling out the
renewal application for their client Ledgestone; and again they put the subdivision as the operation firm instead of
J&J. Whatever, doubt it is worth the effort to get them to correct it.
I do not need to approve all of these U/D; I think you can put the standard language in there for U/D,,,, isn't it
something like —100 feet upstream and —200 feet downstream of the discharge pipe is fine with me.
Thanks,
er-d D..E
ILI;
. i
Lzwdlla 0�
Environmental Senior SpecialistlDivisio
North Carohm Department of Environn
828-2. -45 0(Office)
Linda. wIgg de»r. ov

Young, Brianna A
From: Wiggs, Linda
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:41 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Subject: RE: Ledgestone Permit
Hi,
I just don't like that there are no clarifiers listed, but it can be assumed with an extended aeration system there are
clarifiers.
The next downstream outfall is —700' away.
D_ Q
�_3
•a.s • ZIA.
From: Young, Brianna A
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:25 AM
To: Wiggs, Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Ledgestone Permit
fzwdar 04
Environmental Senior SpecialistlDivisio
Northar lina► Department of Environn
2 -2. -45 0(Office)
Linda.wiggs' .deff.gov
Sorry for the second email. Concerning the components, I didn't change those at all (that is what was listed in the
previous permit). Does something here need to change? And for the U/D, if there are discharges so close together,
would 100ft/200ft not be impacted by other discharges?
Brianna Young, MS
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources
Office: 919-707-3619
[e-mail] (e-mail preferred during State of Emergency)
Mailing address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Physical address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle
your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this
challenging time.
From: Young, Brianna A
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 11:19 AM
To: Wiggs, Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Ledgestone Permit
If I'm seeing this correctly, you're saying the discharge needs to be moved slightly further north than where it is at
right now? Do you have the accurate outfall coordinates? I based the map off of what was in BIMS, so if those are
wrong we need to make sure the correct ones are in there.
Brianna Young, MS
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources
Office: 919-707-3619
Brian na.Young(c�ncdenr.gov (e-mail preferred during State of Emergency)
Mailing address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Physical address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle
your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this
challenging time.
From: Wiggs, Linda <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2020 2:12 PM
To: Young, Brianna A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Ledgestone Permit
Hi Brianna,
The map in that draft is incorrect, see attached for correct location. The map in the draft is showing where the Tyco
discharge is located, not the Ledgestone. There are several dischargers close to each other in this short stretch of
the river. Note: my terrain navigator is used as a working document, so ignore the bit of the coordinates you see at
the top of the image.
I don't like the way the components read, but I see it is because James and James did a poorjob of filling out the
renewal application for their client Ledgestone; and again they put the subdivision as the operation firm instead of
J&J. Whatever, doubt it is worth the effort to get them to correct it.

I do not need to approve all of these U/D; I think you can put the standard language in there for U/D,,,, isn't it
something like —100 feet upstream and —200 feet downstream of the discharge pipe is fine with me.
Thanks,
�f(Cd 6�5
nvironm ntal Senior Spec ialisDivisio
Now Carolina Department ofEnvironn
2 -29 -45 00(Office)

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date: 10/26/2C Page
1 of 2
Permit:
nc0087556
MRS Betweel 8 - 2015 and10 - 2020
Region:
%
Violation Category:%
Program Category:
Facility Name: %
Param Nam(%
County:
%
Subbasin: %
Violation Action: %
Major Minor:
%
PERMIT: NCO087556
FACILITY: Ledgestone Property Owners Association -
COUNTY: Buncombe REGION: Asheville
Ledgestone Subdivision WWTP
Limit Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
03-2017
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
03/30/17
Weekly
mg/I
45
49.6 10.2 Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOV
Concentration
Exceeded
07-2017
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
07/10/17
2 X week
ug/I
28
31 10.7 Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
08-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/17/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/24/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
07-2016
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
07/02/16
2 X week
ug/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
10-2016
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
10/01/16
2Xweek
ug/I
Frequency Violation
No Action, BPJ
02-2017
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
02/04/17
2 X week
ug/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/17/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/24/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
10-2015
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit orthru
10/31/15
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
11 -2019
001
Effluent
Flow, in conduit or thru
11/30/19
Continuous
mgd
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
treatment plant
10-2015
001
Effluent
pH
10/24/15
Weekly
su
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
10-2015
001
Effluent
pH
10/31/15
Weekly
su
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/17/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 10/26/2C Page 2 of 2
Permit: nc0087556 MRS Betweel 8 - 2015 ancI10 - 2020 Region: % Violation Category:% Program Category: %
Facility Name: % Param Nam(% County: % Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: NCO087556 FACILITY: Ledgestone Property Owners Association - COUNTY: Buncombe REGION: Asheville
Ledgestone Subdivision WWTP
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
08-2019 001 Effluent Solids, Total Suspended - 08/24/19 Weekly mg/I Frequency Violation Proceed to
Concentration Enforcement Case
Reporting Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
07-2019 08/31/19 Late/Missing DMR Proceed to NOV
11 -2019 12/31/19 Late/Missing DMR Proceed to NOV

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Ledgestone Property Owners Association, Inc.
Atin: Leslie Norman
PO Box 21
Fairview, NC 28730
Subject: Permit Renewal -
Application No. NCO087556
Ledgestone Subdivision WWTP
Buncombe County
Dear Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 02, 2020
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the April 1, 2020 receipt of your permit renewal application'and .
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's 'NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 150B-3'your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current -permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the.status of your renewal application' can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deg. nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary, reviewer of the, application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sin Fg�''
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North%ro3inaDepartmentof-EnvironrnantelQualJty I.DivisonofV4terRe.sourw_s'
M��•. QEQ AaHt:i Renna9 �}ffia_ 12Da41f.S. 7D }f �ia�va} 15wannsnos,. North {z NTina 2$77� '-

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D(
For privately -owned treatment systems'treating 100*% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete ;application to:
N. C. DENR / Division of Water.iQaality / .NPDES Unit RECEIVED
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, 'NC 27699,,-1617
:APR 0 12020
"DES Permit C_WS,7556 ,
r you are completing this orm in co NC��Q/D.WR/NPDES
f y 9 f mputer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move vm one
field to the next: To check the boxes, click your mouse on top. of the box Otherwise, please print or Type.
1. Contact Information: '
i 1
Owner Name Ledgestone Pro perty-Owners$ Association, Inc.
Facility Name
Ledgestone Subdivision WWTP i
Mailing Address
P. O. Box 21
City
Fairview i
State / Zip Code
NC 28730 i
Telephone Number
828-628-2776
Fax Number
---------------
e-mail Address
[e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge: ,
Check here if same, address as above ❑
Street Address or State
Road Miller Road (MCSR 2800)
City
Fairview ?
State / Zip Code
NC 28730
County
Buncombe
3, Operator Information: -
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in -Responsible Charge or ORCj
Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Ledgestone- Property,Owners' Association, Inc.
P. O. Boa 21
Fairview
NO 28730
f
828-628-2776
e-mail Address ledgestone99@yahoo,com
1 of 3
r. ;. n 4 4 14 n

NPDES-APPLICATION ..FORM D{
For Privately -owned treatment systems, treating 100% donmestiq wastewaters ll.ti HRGD
4. Description of wastewater: i
Facilitv:Generatiw Wastewater(check,all that applyk
Industrial ❑ Number of Employees j
Commercial ❑ Number of Employees i
Residential X Number of Homes
— _20
School Number of Students/Staff
Other
❑ Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (example: subdivision
restaurants, etc.): , mobile home 'park, shopping eente s,
Subdivision, domestic waste
,
Number of persons served:
5. Type of collection system
,
X Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and; sanitary•sewer)
b. Outfall 'inibrmation:
Number of sepa±•ate d!C0!t__ ,;, jpaj=G 1 j
Outfall Identification number(s) 001 i
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes X No
7. Name ,of receiving stream(s) (NEW applicants• Provi
outfallr de a map showing the exact location of each
Cane Creek in the French Broad River Basin i
I
S. Frequency of Discharge: X Continuous ❑ Intermittent,
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration: j
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for,BOD; TSS, nitrogeniand
phosphorus. the space provided'is not sufficient, attach the -description of the treatmentsystem in a
separate sheet of paper.
1! 0.027 MGD facility with extended aeration basin, chlorine contact
basin/ dechlorination.
°2of3

NPDES APPLICATION. FORM Di'
For' privately -owned treatment -systems" treating "100% domestic wastewaters <1.014i[GD
I
10. Flow Information: ! i
j
Treatment Plant Design flow 0.027 MGD
Annual Average daily flow O.o03 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily -flow MGD 0.009 (for the previous 3 years)
11. Is this facility located on Indian countryp
❑ Yes X No
12. Eftluent Data
ARE 182 CANW.- Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coli o Te " eiriture and pN shall be grab
samples, for all Other -Parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be d. re than one analysis is reported,
report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum the past 3 months for Dprovide the highest single reading (Daily Maximum) and Monthly Ave we over
the past 36 months or �"­­�,Mtteursurrentl in our ermit. Mark other ammeters "N/ADIParametJun.* Monthly Units of
.--v.w ` .racaaurCmvf
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (130135) 15.7 12.4+ MG%L
Fecal Coliform 620 3.4 CFU/ l Obml,
Total Suspended Solids 90.0 39.0a MG/L
Temperature (Summer) 24.9 22.0' C
Temperature (Winter) 11.7 9.7 ` C
PH 8.2 7.6 , -units
13. List all permits, construction- approvals and/or applications:
Type Permit" Number Type Permit Number
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) NESRAPS (CAA)
UIC (SDWA)
Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
NPDES NC0087556 Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA)
PSD (CAA) Other
Non -attainment program (CAA) 1
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the <Information contained in the application and thaf� to the
best of y.knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and ccurate.
Primed name of Pe n Signing1117 Title
/ / r L/
OI
North Carolina General Statute 143-216.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes -any false sta
application, record, report, plan, or other -document files or required to be, -maintained "under Artide 21 or n Commission implementing- that Article, orwho falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate ar
required to'be-operated or -maintained under Article 21 or regulations -of 'the Environmental Management Cc
guilty of a misdemeanor punishabfeby a tiine not to exceed $26,000, or by imprisonmeht not to exceed six-i
provides a punishment by a tine of.not more than $25,000 orimprisonment not more than"5 years,,or both, for.
3of3
rdl
ement representation; or i ertificffon in any
putations of the Environmental'Management
t recordirig,or monitoring deWce,or method
mmission implementing that Artinle; shall be,
7onths, or by, both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001
t similar offense.)