20181029 Ver 1_SAW-2018-01162 Changes_20210121

Strickland, Bev
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 9:54 AM
To: Davis, Erin B; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Subject: [External] FW: Monkey Wall SAW-2018-01162 Changes
Attachments: Figure 9 - Concept Design Plan - Monkey Wall - Nov 2020 Update.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spa m.<mailto:[e-mail]>
FYI
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
-----Original Message -----
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 20219:49 AM
To: Kasey Carrere <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bradley Breslow <[e-mail]>; Tsomides, Harry <[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Monkey Wall SAW-2018-01162 Changes
Morning Kasey,
Given the fact that you're proposing to eliminate easement breaks and relocate a utility line, I think the IRT
would be in favor of this change in credits. I support submitting the changes at as -built with a mit plan
addendum with the change in credits explained. Thanks for notifying us in advance.
Kim
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
-----Original Message -----
From: Kasey Carrere <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:55 AM
To: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bradley Breslow <[e-mail]>; Tsomides, Harry <[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Monkey Wall SAW-2018-01162 Changes
Good Morning Kim,
1

As Brad and you have discussed, we are in the process of working with DMS to make a few changes to the
Monkey Wall conservation easement before finalizing. Because the trout moratorium delayed our
construction schedule, we decided to further evaluate relocating the existing utility lines on the project parcel,
to remove any easement breaks on the project. After multiple meetings with the utility company and
adjacent landowners, we determined the relocation of the utility lines outside the easement into the NCDOT
right-of-way is possible. We are not proposing any changes to the overall mitigation plan/design or
restoration/enhancement activities; we are only proposing a change to the conservation easement shape and
the elimination of the breaks/crossings. These updates will generate an increase in credits, changing the
mitigation plan that was approved by the IRT. After thorough communication with DMS, we thought it would
be best to make the change to the mitigation plan at as -built as an amendment once the utility relocation was
finalized and resurveyed. At that time, RES would re -run the NSBW calculations for IRT review/approval. I
have attached the updated concept for your convenience. Please let us know if an amendment at as -built is
the best path forward and if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Thank you,
Kasey Carrere
Project Manager
RES I res.us
Mobile: [phone]

Legend
Proposed Easement (25.28 ac)
0:0 Remove Rock Wall
® Existing Wetland
® Proposed Utility Easement
Approach
Restoration
Enhancement II
Preservation
- L-O-11
fjr �
Removal of Structure
Project Credits
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed Length (LF)
Mitiation Ratio SMUs
G1-A
Preservation
278
10:1 27.800
G1-B
Enhancement ll(5)
120
5:1 24.000
G1-C
Restoration
1,529
1:1 1,529.000
G2
Restoration
1,710
1:1 1,710.000
' Total
3,637
3,290.800
N
W E
s
150
Credit Loss in Required Buffer-37.190
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 876.210
Total Adjusted SMUs 4,129.820
Date: 11 /12/2020
Figure 9 - Concept Design Plan
Drawn by: KC res
Monkey Wall Mitigation Project
Checked by:: KC
300
Mitchell County, North Carolina 1 inch =300feet