20110195 Ver 2_401 Application_20111011

"- 0 IRS U91
Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
4011
se W Blvd.
MMANDSVVER R
aleigh, , NC NC 2
Raleigh, 27607
Environmental Engineers & Scientists 919-833-7152
Fax: [phone]
September 29, 2011
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 DENR - wAiERUUAWY
YYEWDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Re: Request for Permit Modification, Westside Regional Pump Station and Force Main,
Greenville Utilities Commission, Greenville, Pitt County, North Carolina
NCDWQ ID Number: unknown
Dear Sir/Madam,
The Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) application for the above referenced project has been
revised due to a design modification. A property owner whose property will be crossed by the
proposed force main requested that the proposed pipeline be located along the property
boundary in order to address a conflict with his planned use for the property. The new
alignment follows the edge of an existing overhead utility transmission line and is located
adjacent to and abutting the maintained easement. Please find attached the revised PCN
application and additional information regarding the proposed impacts to jurisdictional Section
404 wetlands, streams, and protected riparian buffers. As no correspondence has been
received from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) relative to this project, the
NCDWQ ID number for the project is not known at this time.
Impacts to wetlands under the previously submitted alignment include 0.196 acre of permanent
impact and 0.72 acre of temporary impact to jurisdictional wetlands. The original permit
application also included temporary impacts to 350 feet of stream and permanent impacts to
7,221 square feet of Zone 1 riparian buffer and 3,718 square feet of Zone 2 riparian buffer. The
enclosed permit modification request increases the wetland impact totals to 0.306 acre of
permanent impact and 0.88 acre of temporary impact. Impacts to streams and Zone 1 riparian
buffers are unchanged. A total of 3,932 square feet of Zone 2 riparian buffer impacts are
proposed under the enclosed permit modification request.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requires mitigation for the permanent impact to wetlands
associated with the proposed project. Greenville Utilities Commission has arranged with NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to acquire riparian wetland mitigation credits from the In-Lieu
Fee program and thereby meet the requirements for mitigation.
New York, NY . Armonk, NY . Woodbury, NY • Detroit, MI • Raleigh, NC • Charlotte, NC • Atlanta, GA • Fairfax, VA • Hollywood, FL • Boca Raton, FL • Fort Pierce, FL • Sarasota, FL • Miami, FL • Philadelphia, PA
1JtfZE AND WYM
NC DWQ 401/Wetlands Unit
September 29, 2011
Page 2
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 919.863.9256.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
7a1? Linda Diebolt
Principal Scientist
Attachment
CC: Steve Porter, GUC
I 1-01gS L) ?'
?oF w A T, 9p
C,
t I > ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Westside Regional Pump Station and Force Main
2b. County: Pitt County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greenville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
00h • vvAi
3. Owner Information lJ5AN05TORMWATERBF,ANGH
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Municipality
4b. Name: Steve Porter
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Greenville Utilities Commission
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1847
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835-1847
4f. Telephone no. 252.551.1494
4g. Fax no.: 252.551.1598
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Linda Diebolt
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Hazen and Sawyer
5c. Street address: 4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607
5e. Telephone no.: 919.833.7152
5f. Fax no.: 919.833.1828
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Latitude: 35.626981 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.368395
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 34 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Tar River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The pump station site consists of active agricultural land. Where feasible, the force main and interceptor are located in or
immediately adjacent to existing, maintained roadway and utility easements. Portions of the project corridor are
undeveloped and include maintained, grassed areas and forested areas. Existing conditions within and adjacent to the
project corridor are depicted on the attached Project Detail Maps.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.74
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,303
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) is proposing modifications to their wastewater system to meet the 2030
wastewater needs in the Westside service area in response to the anticipated increase in effluent of the Hospital and
Medical District.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
GUC proposes to decommission the existing 2.02 million gallons per day (mgd) Westside Pump Station (PS), which was
constructed in 1970, and replace it with a 6 mgd Westside Regional PS, construct 1,400 feet of 15-inch and 3,900 feet of
21-inch interceptor routing flow from the existing Westside PS to the new Westside Regional PS, decommission the
existing 150 gallons per minute (gpm) Paladin Place PS, construct 50 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer routing flow from the
existing Paladin Place PS to the proposed 21-inch Westside interceptor, and construct 32,000 feet of 24-inch and 30-inch
force main to route flow from the proposed Westside Regional PS to the GUC Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).
Construction equipment will include dozers for land clearing and backhoes for trench excavation and back-filling. Front
end loaders and a horizontal directional drill rig will also be used during construction of the proposed project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms for
three streams is included herein
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T See Attached ? Yes ? Corps
Sheet ? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.306 (P)
0.88 (T)
2h. Comments: Directional drill and bore and jack techniques will be used to avoid wetlands within portions of the project
corridor. Also, an existing maintained easement will be used where feasible to avoid permanent impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T See Attached ? PER ? Corps
Sheet ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 350 (T)
3i. Comments: Directional drill and bore and jack techniques will be used to avoid stream impacts within portions of the project
corridor. Open cut installation techniques with coffer dams and pump around will be used for some of the stream crossings.
Page 5of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ®Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
131 ®P ? T Utility
corridor UT to Harris Mill Run ® Nos 4821 2118
B2 ®P ? T Utility
corridor Schoolhouse Branch ? Nos 2400 1814
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 7221 3932
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts have been avoided by using directional drill and bore and jack installation methods. Also,
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
existing maintained easements will be used where feasible to avoid permanent impacts to buffers. Buffer disturbances will be
40 feet or less and maintained corridors in the buffer will be 10 feet or less.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional resources can only be completely avoided by implementation of a no-build scenario. The no-build
scenario is not an acceptable option. Delineation of jurisdictional streams and wetlands was performed prior to design of the
proposed project. The location of the lines was dictated by the location of existing utilities and infrastructure in some areas.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas have been minimized by the directional drilling of the Tar River and the adjacent wetlands and
by locating the proposed construction within existing easements, where feasible. Bore and jack installation techniques will also
be used at one stream crossing to avoid impacts to jurisdictional areas and buffers. Impacts to jurisdictional areas were
minimized to the extent possible while still meeting minimum engineering and safety requirements. All stream crossings will be
within 15 degrees of perpendicular. The open cut stream crossings will use temporary coffer dams with pump arounds during
construction to minimize the potential for downstream water quality impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best management practices, and sedimentation and erosion control methods will be used during all construction activities. No
equipment refueling or maintenance activities will occur adjacent to jurisdictional areas. Wetland impacts during construction
will be minimized to the extent that is reasonably feasible. All temporary impacts to jurisdictional areas during construction will
be returned to their original configuration and stabilized and/or seeded within 21 days of completion of grading activities.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
®Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.50 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? <0.01 %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project is a Low Density project.
2d . If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e . Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b . Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments: A FONSI was issued for the proposed project on July 23, 2010
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project replaces two outdated pump stations and provides the infrastructure to route flow from the
decommissioned pump stations to the new Westside Regional PS.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage will be generated from the proposed project. The proposed project entails construction of wastewater lines
and a wastewater pump station.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ®
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Review of Natural Heritage Program data relative to known occurrences and populations of listed species was performed
via NC CGIA data and at the Natural Heritage Program office in Raleigh. Additionally, field surveys were performed in
October 2009 to determine if potential habitat for listed species was present within the project corridor. If potential habitat
was determined to be present within the project corridor, additional visual surveys were performed to determine if listed
species were present. No listed species were observed within the project corridor during field investigations.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Review of Essential Fish Habitat designations was performed via NC CGIA data.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Review was performed of listed historical and archeological sites at the State Historic Preservation Office.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Upon completion of the wastewater line, the project corridor will be
returned to its previous grade; therefore, no decrease in floodplain capacity will occur from the proposed project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make th e floodplain determination? 2008 FEMA mapping
Randall D. Emory, P.E. ? 9/27/2011
Director of Water Resources -?
Applicant/Agent's Signal re Date
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization tter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page I 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of Area of Impact
number- (if known) jurisdiction (Corps (acres)
Permanent (P) or -404, 10 DWQ-
Temporary (T) non-404, other)
AD - P Land clearing and Yes 404 0.12
subsurface utility
installation
AF-T (new Subsurface utility No 404 0.16
impact) installation
AF - P (modified Land clearing and Yes 404 0.18
impact) subsurface utility
installation
AG -T Subsurface utility No 404 0.02
installation
AJ-AY - T Subsurface utility No 404 0.68
installation
AZ-T Subsurface utility No 404 0.01
installation
BA -T Land clearing and Yes (will not be 404 0.01
subsurface utility maintained)
installation
BB - P Land clearing and Yes 404 0.006
subsurface utility
installation
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of Stream Name Perennial (PER) Type of jurisdiction Area of Impact length
number- impact or intermittent (Corps-404, 10 Impact (linear feet)
Permanent (P) (INT)? DWQ- non-404, (acres)
or Temporary (T) other)
AB-T Subsurface UT to Harris INT 404 0.01 80
utility Mill Run
installation
AC-T Subsurface Schoolhouse INT 404 0.03 40
utility Branch
installation
AH - T Subsurface UT to INT 404 0.007 55
utility Schoolhouse
installation Branch
Al -T Subsurface UT to INT 404 0.003 32
utility Schoolhouse
installation Branch
AX - T Subsurface UT to Tar River INT 404 0.004 41
utility
installation
AW -T Subsurface UT to Tar River INT 404 0.004 41
utility
installation
AK -T Subsurface UT to Parker INT 404 0.008 35
utility Creek
installation
AL-T Subsurface Baldwin INT 404 0.003 26
utility Swamp
installation
El anc ment
PROGRAM
September 28, 2011
Randall Emory
Greenville Utilities Commission
PO Box 1847
Greenville, NC 27835-1847
Project: Westside Regional Pump Station and Force Main
Expiration of Acceptance: March 28, 2012
County: Pitt
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009-337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011-343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Tar-Pamlico 03020103 0 0 0 0.306 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone].
ly,
Michael Ison
Deputy Director
cc: Ian McMillan, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Emily Jernigan, USACE-Washington
Linda Diebolt/Keven Arrance, agent
File
R.estoruT... E ... Prt" 014r Stag
T
REDEEM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nr-eep.net
Legend
Proposed Westside Regional PS
Fp-sl Existing PS - to be decommissioned
Proposed Force Main i
Proposed Interceptor

F
CA y k 1
xaw
uuoRr i
Proposed Force Main'
elv
11 _ ',G 1
z
;A?t' '???, : awR?•?e ??? ??? _ -.--TAP " ,

ey -`

? I

- .fir)
7 t
r
V. t
SCALE N Figure 1
Site Location Map
0 0.375 0.75 1.5 W E HAZEN AND SAWYER Westside Regional Pump Station
Mile Enviio""'an'al Engineers & 5cient,sts L and Force Main
Greenville Greenville Utilities Commission
1 inch = 0.75 mile S UtilitieS Source 7 5 Minute USGS Topographic Map - Greenville NW,
Greenville NE Greenville SW Greenville SE. North Carolina
Legend k4 \ -1
Previously Permitted Project Corridor/ "a""3
Limits of Construction M??iRUn
k
Currently Proposed Project Corridor/'" '
Limits of Construction, TAR RIVER
Jurisdictional Wetlands TAR RIVER
Jurisdictional Streams Area Shown
Rivers and Streams E 1 .5 miles,
Zone 1 Buffer Limit
1 9 f ,? IF, A
Zone 2 Buffer Limit "
r
T-, OF
o i
a s
Wetland AF
t Permanent Wetland Impact-
0. 18 ?? a
• ?
• • ,?"? ;??;«•?..? acre o'
w?u - 7,840 square feet Yr ,,
4 ts?v;''?r "-.. Temporary Wetland Impact: g
r
0. 16 acre
s, 6,970 square feet ,?.
r , ,.
41,
?• ? ,# ? ?`??.. ??'• . .s a' 'fi'r ??:,.
Stream AC.
Temporary Stream Impact:
40 feet ><<
.?
?w
0.03 acre 's
Permanent Buffer Impact:
Zone 1 - 2,400 square feet
Wetland AD
Zone 2 - 1,814 square feet
Permanent '
-?__-_- Permanent Wetland Impact:
0.12 acre
5,258 square feet
SCALE N Figure 2
0 100 200 400 , Project Detail Map
W E HAZEN A?'VD SAWYER ?
Feet E-ro.-1d1 Eng,te,s G sc em;st, Westside Regional Pump Station
Greenville and Force Main
1 inch = 200 feet g utilities Greenville Utilities Commission