20110863 Ver 1_Application_20110920

~.
~~~
.~~-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
September 15, 2011
Mr. Brian Wrenn
0
~~~~~
yam, SFo 2 ~ ,~~5'
osT~'~~R~ry
EUGENE A. CONTI,y
SECRETARY
Division of Water Quality
401/Transportation Permitting Unit ® Q ~ t~
1650 Mail Service Center (~ J
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Pipe replacement on SR 2167 (Oakwood Drive), Gas[on County
Deaz Mr. Wrenn:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace a
deteriorating pipe on SR 2167 (Oakwood Road) in Gaston County. NCDOT proposes to replace
the existing 60-foot 48" CMP with a 60-foot 48" CMP and a total of 10 feet of riprap at the new
pipe inlet and outlet. The stream is an intermittent, low-flow, urban stream with limited aquatic
life. NCDOT proposes to place the new pipe on the existing streambed grade, and requests a
waiver Crom the Water Quality Certification No. 3687 Comditiom #9 (Nationwide 3 Regiomal
Comdidou 3.6) permit depth specification, for the construcNou oC this project. A temporary
cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream flow around the construction site, if
needed. Areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored to pre-project
conditions. The scope of work will result in 10 feet of permanent riprap impacts80 feet of
temporary impacts to an unnamed tributary to Taylors Creek, which is classified as a WS-IV
'watershed by the Division of Water Quality.
The project is not located within %, mile of a critical watershed area nor is SR 2167 a rural or
urban arterial area; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous
spill basin checklist. This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for
historical sites and threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register
of Historic Places are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible
structures.
The federally listed species for Gaston County (USFWS listed dated September 22, 2010)
include Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianihus schweinitiziQ, (E) Endangered, and bog turtle
(Glyptemmy muhlenbergii) (T/SA) Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance. T/SA species
are not subject to section 7 consultation. National Heritage Program records document the
nearest sunflower location approximately 2.3 miles southwest of the proposed project area.
Schweinitz's sunflower is known from a variety of soil types but is generally found growing on
shallow, poor, clayey and/or rocky soils, and is typically found roadsides, power line clearings,
old pastures, woodland openings and other sunny or semi-sunny situations. There is little
suitable habitat within the proposed project area and no species were observed. No impact on
this species is anticipated.
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047

SR 2167, Oakwood Drive
Page 2
September 15,'2011
1 have enclosed apre-construction notification for a NW#3, a sketch of planned activities and
location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150456-55120005-120.036016-3126
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any, questions~or concerns please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
cc Polly Lespinasse, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office

o~~ty-_.,,~Eg~pG
L.It.V\.Jl'ti
o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWO project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a . Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ^Yes ®No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
^ 401 Water Quality Certifcation -Express ^ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No 'For the record on

®Yes ly for Corps Permit:

^ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ^Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ^Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 2167, Oakwood Drive
2b. County: Gaston
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Mt. Holly
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No. -
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable): '
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ^ Agent ^ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Busines s name
(if applicable): N.C, Department of Transportation, Division 12
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
5b. Business name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
Se. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
Sf. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA

1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.3190 Longitude: - 81.05310
pD.DDDDDD
( ) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: <.10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of riearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Taylors Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Pipe is located on a paved secondary road in a subdivision. Landuse is wooded and residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace deteriorating pipes and to pave an unpaved secondary road to paved
road standards for the safety of the traveling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace an existing 60-foot 48" CMP with a 60-foot 48" CMP with fve feet of riprap at the inlet and
outlet of the new pipe. The stream is a low Flow intermittent channel in a urban with limited aquatic life. NCDOT
proposes not to bury the pipe per regulation.
A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream flow around the construction sites as needed.
Area affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored to preproject conditions. The Project will be constructed
using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ^ Yes ®No ^ Unknown . _ _
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determinations made by
the Division 12 DEO.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
^ Preliminary ^ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History i
Sa. Have permits or certifcations been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ^ Yes ®No ^ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
^ Wetlands - ®Streams -tributaries ^ Buffers
^ Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWO -non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 ^ P ^ T ~ ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W2 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W3 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W4 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^DWQ
W5 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
W6 ^ P ^ T ^ Yes ^Corps
^ No ^ DWO
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ -non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Riprap @
S1 ®P ^ T inleUoutlet for Ut to Taylors ^ PER ®Corps 0
5 10
structure Creek ®INT ®DWQ .
_ stabilization _

S2 ^ P ®T Cofferdam bypass
pumping, if Ut to Taylors ^ PER ®Corps
0
5
80
needed Creek ®INT ®DWQ .
S3 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^ Carps
^ INT ^ DWO
S4 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
SS ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^DWQ
S6 ^ P ^ T ^ PER ^Corps
^ INT ^ DWO
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts •10
3i. Comments: 'Permanent impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ^P^T
02 ^P^T
03 ^P^T
04 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts -
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. Sc: 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
SL Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
Sj. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Meth od of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti anon, then ou MUST f 11 out Section D of this form.
6a.
^ Neuse ^Tar-Pamlico ^ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? - ^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet
)
(square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
B2 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
63 ^P^T ^Yes
^ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ^ Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ^ DWQ ^ Corps
`
2c. IProjecwvhich mitigat ion option will be used for this ^ Mitigation bank
^ payment to in-lieu fee program
^ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ^ warm ^ cool ^cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a . Does the project include or is itadjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ^Yes ®No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ^Yes ^ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ®Yes ^ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250. '
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
^ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^ DWO Stormwater Program
® DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
^ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented Stormwater management programs ^ NSW
^ USMP
apply (check all that apply): ^ Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ^ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
^ Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented Stormwater management programs apply ^ HOW
^ ORW
(check all that apply):
^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ^Yes ^ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ^Yes ^ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ^Yes ^ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/stale/local) funds or the ®Yes ~ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been fnalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ^Yes ^ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ^Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is classifed as a minimum critieria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not
result in additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page ] 0 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
^ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
i
^ Yes ®No
mpacts?

5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Offce you have contacted. ^ Raleigh
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Desi
nated Critical
g
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database. ,
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation Office resources and the National Register of Historic Places werer reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement projects occur within a previously impacted area (NC
DOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ^ Yes ®No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the Floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM papal number: 3710358700)

ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only rf an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

_ - ~-- ~. .
t ,
~ ~ r ~.
~ ( .. ~ ~\
' ~ ~ Ott `~ •, •7~ ¢ ` ~ / ` ~ -~
.~~1 r ~` •~ ~.~` •y.~ 6' •''l~ is ~1 r // ~ `y~ `, J ~
'` C" ; ~ 1 ~ r Pipe Replacement `~
reen ~°tear, ~:sE >,•. ~ . .J t',~. ~ ~ , f ' t
COt/Wiry {nub .+~ .. _-4+ .,: '
_/ ~ y r f i t ~~ ,
t ! ',a
~~Y I tin
I. .% r° ~.
P _ ~ I
~• - i •
°~~
~, ~ .
,~
r
,r . . < `~`
-' :lc/at
\~•~ ~ ~ ~,';,~~ i J ".rte J ` ,' f~
_ • - - ~ -
- 7 ~.
+- • _ y ~ \
~ ~ s t r
i~
Name: MT HOLLY Location: 035.3190083° N 081.0531073° W
Date: 9/15/2011 Caption: Pipe Replacement, SR 2167, Oakwood Road, UT to Taylors
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Creek, WS-IV Watershed, Catawba River Basin

n3 n~
b o , ,L6^~ u b ~ ab
y W' ~~ ~ y w ~5 n
o ~ ~
n ~ ~ a . n~
N ~ ~y ~6n~ N ~ •° ~ n`~
. ~ ti e ~ ~ N
° ~ ley.^9 ° ~ ~, >~ti6^~
II Z ? O ,fib ~~ II i ~ Otltib ,~
~~ y ~ ~ `,~\6 n~ ti a • y0`6 n
a~ II b Ed'ISTING. INV pN) a n r~9
' PROPOSED. /NV. (/~\7
EL. 9J.30'
EL. 97.30'
m
n ~ 'a ~
W I O y AO ~ m
D ti ~ ~
Q n k ~ A ~ ~
o+ ti y :n+' O p ~ y
~ ~ ~ n C1 y A ~ ~ t2 b 'a
~ b y n
b o ~ 5 `} a k b r ~ }~j 1~
II ~1 ~~., A '~ ~
bhy II ~ ~ ~ A r1
~ ~ Y ° 'v ~-. ~ 1
~An W L+J V ~ ~ ~ t`
"< 3 y y
:m o y ca >' C O `J
n m ; cn o '~ y ~ ~/
~ R G~
m~~ ~ y
m y
ram ° ~
mom II °
II
aio
m o i~ ti
3~ ~v
n b
~ EXISTING INV. (OUT) I'ROYOSED INV. (OUT)
T F
m ~ °- EL. 90.57' ° EL. 90.57'
? C r ~ ~ ~6r- ~ 6i.
E ~ <
h O ° 9''' o_ i°i.
O _t O
°a o 2 0O b tJ. rr.
tyn m N Gj b
ro ~
~ c C 2
O in
zzx
n ~ K '"
F ~ .. Z rn
v
v C7
Y
y

Pipe Replacement
SR 2167, Oakwood Rd
Gaston County
Inlet
Upstream
Downstream
Outlet

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
~. Division: 17 County: (;acrnn Project ID: 120.036016
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 2167 (Oakwood Drivel Stream: UT to Taylor Creek
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r
WSI r
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation- Yes No
Arterial Urban r r
Arterial Rural r r
Additional Site Infonnation:
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? ~

Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).