20050123 Ver 1_Complete File_20050125

Elm GL F
JAN 2 1 Mnl)
(? ?,.?`•?", ° m• DENR -WATER CtilrLi"iY
®5 V WETLANDS AND STORMMER BRANCH
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EAsLEY LYNDo TwPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 17, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. John Thomas
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Nationwide 33 Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge No. 310
over Buffalo Creek on SR 1507, NCDOT Division 11, Ashe County. Federal
Aid Project No. BRZ-1507(2), State Project No. 82712001, WBS No.
33261.1.1, TIP Project No. B-3805.
Please find enclosed three copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) Document, as well
as, the Pre-construction Notification, permit drawings, %2 size plans, and USFWS
concurrence request- letter for the above referenced project completed by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The agency proposes that Bridge No.
310, consisting of 51 feet of timber floor on I-beams, be replaced with a new 75-foot long
bridge approximately 15 feet north of the existing structure. The new bridge will
accommodate two eleven-foot lanes, on a single span, with no bents in the water. A
temporary work bridge will be needed for construction. The work bridge will require
Class II rip-rap for stabilization, resulting in 0.015 acre of temporary in-stream fill.
Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction. The NC Division of
Water Quality has assigned a best usage classification of "C" for Buffalo Creek. Also,
the Wildlife Resource Commission has requested that a bass moratorium be used, which
will prohibit any in-stream activity from May 1 till July 15.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Buffalo Creek [DWQ Index No. 10-2-20] is the only surface water directly affected by
the proposed project and occurs in subbasin 050702 of the New River Basin. Buffalo
Creek is approximately 25 to 30 feet wide with a depth of up to 1.5 feet.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
y t
Permanent Impacts: This site contains no jurisdictionalwetlands. The bridge replacement
will cause no permanent impacts to Buffalo Creek.
Temporary Impacts: There will be 0.015 acre of temporary in-stream fill, resulting from
Class H rip-rap, used to stabilize the work bridge.
The Division of Water Quality Best Usage classification for Buffalo Creek is "C". Also,
the Wildlife Resource Commission has requested that a bass moratorium be used, which
will prohibit any in-stream activity from May 1 till July 15. There are no waters
classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1: undeveloped
watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds) or Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW) within 1 mile of the project study area.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 310 contains one span totaling 51 feet in length. The
bridge superstructure consists of a timber floor on steel beams, and the substructure
contains one reinforced concrete abutment and one timber end bent. The entire
superstructure and the timber end bent will be removed without dropping any components
into the water, however, there is potential for the reinforced concrete abutment to be
dropped into the water. The resulting potential temporary fill associated with the
reinforced concrete abutment is approximately 31 cubic yards. During demolition and
removal, NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will
be followed.
Utility Impacts: Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corporation has aerial service east of
the existing bridge. Skyline Telephone Membership Corporation has aerial service east of
the existing bridge. It is anticipated that the removal of the existing bridge and the
construction of the new bridge will not interfere with these existing utilities. There are no
underground utilities in the project vicinity.
Restoration Plan: The material used for installation of the temporary work bridge will be
removed after its purpose has been served. The temporary fill areas will be restored to
their original contours. After the temporary work bridge is no longer needed, the
contractor will use excavating equipment to remove all material within jurisdictional
areas. All material will become the property of the contractor who will be required to
submit a reclamation plan for removal and disposal of all materials off-site.
Schedule: It is assumed that the contractor will begin construction of the proposed work
bridge shortly after the date of availability for the project. The Let date is July 19, 2005
with a date of availability of August 30, 2005.
Removal and Disposal: The work bridge will be removed within 90 days after it is no
longer needed. All materials placed in the stream by the contractor will be removed. All
other materials removed by the contractor will be disposed of at an off site, non-
jurisdictional, upland location.
2

FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of February 5, 2003
the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists 7 federally protected species for Ashe County
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Federallv Protected Species for Ashe Countv
Scientific Name Common Name Status Conclusion
Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle T(S/A) N/A
B. Geum radiatum Spreading avens Endangered No Effect
Helonias bullata Swamp pink Threatened No Effect
Gymnoderma lineare Rock gnome lichen Endangered No Effect
Houstonia montana Roan Mountain bluet Endangered No Effect
Liatris helleri Heller's blazin star Threatened No Effect
Spiraea virginiana Virginia spiraea Threatened No Effect
The bog turtle is listed as T(S/A). This designation is due to the bog turtle's similarity of
appearance to another rare species currently listed for protection. Species designated
under T(S/A) are not subject to Section 7 consultation. Therefore, a biological
conclusion for this species is not required.
Spreading avens is found only in the North Carolina and Tennessee sections of the
southern Appalachian Mountains. Spreading avens occurs on scarps, bluffs, cliffs and
escarpments on mountains, hills and ridges. Known populations of this plant have been
found to occur only at elevations of greater than 5,000 feet. Since the project elevation is
less than 3,000 feet and the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare and unique
habitats does not contain records for this species in the area, there will be no effect.
The North Carolina populations of swamp pink are limited to bogs in the southern
Appalachians. Since bogs do not exist in the study area, there will be no effect.
The rock gnome lichen is restricted to areas of high humidity such as mountaintops and
cliff faces which are frequently bathed in fog or lower elevation deep gorges between
mountains. The humid habitat required for this species does not exists at the project site
and there are no records for this species in the area, thus the project will not affect this
species.
Roan Mountain bluet can be found on grassy balds, cliffs, outcrops, and steep slopes.
Known populations of Roan Mountain bluet all occur at elevations above 4,600 feet.
This project has an elevation of 2,800 feet and has no rock cliffs or outcrops. Because of
these existing conditions and because there is no record of this species in the area, the
outcome will be no effect.
3
r'
Heller's blazing star is endemic to high elevation rock ledges in the northern Blue Ridge
Mountains. Since our project elevation is only 2,800 feet and since it contains no rocky
ledges, there will be no effect to this species.
Virginia spiraea is found in a very narrow range of habitats in the mountains of North
Carolina; usually on the scoured banks of high gradient streams. NCDOT performed a
threatened and endangered species survey for Virginia spiraea on October 22, 2001 and
October 8, 2003 at the project site. Habitat for this species was present, although no
species were found during either survey. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has
concurred with no effect for Virginia spiraea (attached).
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States." The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable
and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional stages; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design. The new location for bridge
No. 310 is approximately 15 feet north of the existing bridge. This site was chosen
because it will not result in permanent impacts to the stream. To minimize erosion, a
preformed scour hole is being placed at the north east corner of the bridge. This scour
hole will contain rip-rap to reduce the flow of sediment into the stream. A single span
bridge will be used so that no bents are put into Waters of the United States.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the construction of the work bridge will be
authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and
Dewatering). We are, therefore, requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33
authorizing construction of the work bridge.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3366 will apply to
this project. We will adhere to the general conditions of the Water Quality Committee in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500(a) and 15A NCAC 2B .0200. We are providing
two copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for.their records.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
hII12://www.nedot.org/planning[pe/naturalunit/-Dermit.html.
4
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Megan Willis at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Gregory . Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
fi
w/ attachment:
Mr. John Hennessy, NC DWQ (2 copies)
Mr. Carl McCann, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr. Heath Slaughter, DEO
Mr. Art McMillan, PE, Highway Design
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Derrick Weaver, Planning Engineer
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
5
Office Use Only: V 5Vn 1 23 Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NC)VRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thome, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mswillis(cWot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 310 over Buffalo Creek on SR 1507
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3805
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Ashe . Nearest Town: Warrensville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Project is located on SR 1507
(Stanley) in Southwestern Ashe County.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Approximately 36,28'00" latitude
and 81,31'00" longitude
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): < 1 acre
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Buffalo Creek
8. River Basin: New River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/adinin/ina-y .)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The area surrounding the site is rural farm land and
maintained roadside.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Bridge
No. 310 is to be replaced with a similar structure directly adjacent to the existing
existing bridge will be used for traffic during construction. Standard bridge construction
equipment will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To increase the safety of travelers along SR
1507 byeplacing the old bridge and improving the alignment of the road leading up to the
bridge.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
n/a
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
n/a
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
Page 3 of 9
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:There will be temporary impacts to
0.015 acre of stream due to class II rip-rap which will be used to create a work pad.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
n/a

EE
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at b=://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: n/a
Total area of wetland impact proposed: n/a
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before hn act Perennial or
Intermittent?
leases ec' )
1 Filnemporary 0.015 acre Buffalo Creek 25 ft. Perennial

Page 4 of 9
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.Qov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 0.015 acre (temporary
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
y
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba , ocean, etc.
n/a

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering; irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts were reduced by using a single span bridle so that no bents will be placed in the
water.
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for. USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is required because impacts are only t=orga.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
Page 6 of 9
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wro/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check.the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* impact Multiplier Re uired
Page 7 of 9
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3'
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 8 of 9
i
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
I
Applicant/Agent's Signature 1 Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
r f
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
December 31, 2003
Mr. Brett Feulner
Environmental Biologist
North Carolina Department of Transportation, PDEA
Office of Natural Environment
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Feulner:
Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for Three Bridge Replacement Projects: B-3805,
Bridge No. 310 on SR 1507 over Buffalo Creek; B-3607, Bridge No. 503 on SR 1674
over Buffalo Creek; and B-4014, Bridge No. 281 over Big Horse Creek, All in Ashe
County, North Carolina .
As requested by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, we have reviewed the natural
resources information and biological conclusions for federally protected species for the subject
projects. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
We have reviewed the updated survey information provided for impacts to the federally
threatened Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana) for the subject projects. Given the information
provided, we agree that there will. be no effect to federally listed species for these bridge
replacement projects.
We believe the requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled regarding listed species
for the subject projects. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in
a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
JEFFERSON J
NATIONAL
Damascus $ / l l FO>;ss5 21
_e r. ?.,..-•? _ `. Volney la Indeuendere a
ao co-a1 ,_. % /° rca s~? MOUth 01 low
r // a a ._aWrsc `_.
`n Stu! ills ' Gra55
? ?+ b v Piney Creek Twin
` 421 °•£ 14RMellon &SCrseJ ? ??.' oId 0aks d
l ROJEC trat
'r, 3
r `Mountain Gity tt Lens Shatleyi Lsmmpie 7 Spar,
r`O ?i ?r SO"ngs 2_ .
?` / .? Q°? > ;° w nsvrlle ( Scc rll e S 2
+Q// 67 fjM.FF? },?/ ? L (liver 6 Whitehead
' fit) j Cuh n ett Mon?? ,..?+S(. vk.. ., Cit•on
0 • ?8 crest." Sm po i taurol Springs. ?A
v l0 Was, Jetters.n
n Lett . rdeA Oo Minn
Trad ?, - S1. 04. Pe k
II J(•(Le1 M1 •+1 12?:
Balewin I63 A .
lok ? TG e
4Zlonwt a jg Tra
L a... t ! b i ar Spring $
it W At Y 7 U ?. A Tcdd t ? wvi - McCrady .
?fleet?uoou Odrtls
Su 19R ie ?? Malls Min
ar 6 ovetl
u e T?? ` Vnas .} 1 DeGa ?AIId V' , 6•.'J°
Valle h con is P Wruar hays
!a - Beecn ciucis E A.
Jsl(naa
-M°unti 11 kende?oua MVrn.' IdulOe nv Felf lrs 3annor S.U RIOGF ?k. Fdue. sr
e?
G?• Porear 11 r
leaton Elk- 134 ? 194 MU:ers
, y h- r F ?? 2:'? • - t Crcek. Y6
a Pirk S Sevare 106 _, 7 j Purl!ar Noilli 7 ?y
articrr Suge• a? Devils, 'U a Wukeshnro ?,.
Am.Mmn<1\ 751 _ f.S'i .t O Wllkesl
NCAD0T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY. AsHB COUNTY
PROJECT:8.2712041 c9-5805)
MAPS, PROPOSED BRIDGE RBPLACBMBNT
BRIG. 310 ON SR 1547 IN
ASHE. COUNTY
SHEBT OF 08/ 12/ 04
NORTH CAROLINA
r
NOT TO SCALE
TOPOGRAPHIC
MAIDS
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ASHE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.271R001 (B-5805)
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BRG. V 510 ON SR 1507 IN
ASHE COUNTY
SHEET OF 08/12/04
f
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1445 MODOC DR.
BILLY SHOAF NOFOLK, VA.
23503
185 JOE BADGER RD.
2 HALBERT JAMES TURNER WARRENSVILLE, N.C.
28693
r
z

0
a
N
Q
N E- N
O
1:4
U)
a Q CY) 00

' ? ?
L
O
p ?o zo
x
OD U[ -
N
LU LL LO zz. x°° w
°
w? ?H
¢
?~
w
x? ?
Q o w
Q
a
,
co = o o O o
U
z

(a
L f6
m
a
)

u)
a. t

CL 06

=C E
cli
co m
d
m

0
LL

O
Z U ?

(6
Q W U ?

a

Q E?? a o

W
U
a

z

a N

p O

F-
U = y
g
V
Co
j-
.. U

d ??
m
p

o
~ d X
? ? W C
?

W
a p
Z
=v

Z
? LL?
°-a? m o 0

W
?j
?
y
C C
U
_ ? f0
O
O
LL N v
W
N
U m W
?

= O J J
'
O t!
)
? LL
... 0
r 0
r

In Z ?
zx ??

ACWes+dwaAT Rp1934055_RDY.TSH.dgn
?CONTJMCT:
w o a
? w n
o
-? m o 0
o n x b
22
° N y?
.rte ? ? ? y y
ra OW W
x? o
• ? g g b ??y
y
0 0
+ 0 II II II II II II ?. p??
0. 0. a. w
C F ap ?p o 14
Q ! ^ 4 O
aR _
I,
y O
H H
r x x t!
o
x n
ya b y
"° ?e y O yC
o b b y
H p
0
n 'C
0H
w
N?o 0
° o u ?b
e
e
O. c
y
A p O b
.?. a root. m? y
b
y ?? n
711 ? A
= b? b
a?
4
? y
m x ~
b
M
O d Cam"
`fir ? 1-1
°°? z
n?
y ? z
7? D? y
q CZ y
TIP PROJECT: 8-3805

a
N

1
tts
Y

v
o ?
q lD
J
0
vows,
is
w
0
°o
l
b 83
y 060
O
yy
o cv?
b
b0 0
?bu
C
x O ?
n
V

N a

r
r
?
yy
9
4
N y?

m !? d

5_RDY_TYP.dgn
W '
Q: Q_
1
ago U2
O. O 7OO
rn c
Q- m 3
.7'-
ox
e o ° n
Q- c
in

' O G w w ° ZI y
v a a 3 3• .o f o
Sp ¢m a3
a ' m p
s a
Q N ? K
Cyr C Q C
S
-? -? -? rn n n m 3
3 3 m 3 m 3• AL T '- ? n
3
0 _0
in to C 0
m W m l m p R-.
m a S ° S
3 3 p Q ? ? '-10
r r A ? •a ,Q ?
rt
-o ? -v g n -o
0 -0 -o
O -o -0 •o n rn
A O } ••
0 '•
p p V p& O
A ow n
0 se
O

70 N O
Q_ Q p
a. o- p Q• °
Q
3 W O O
A
o S Q
_ °-1 n
- c ° .
: 3 N N p
o
Q _. a - rt
M n
3 ° n
?? ?(
? n
O
p

3 Q.
A ?
I I I
I
I y
I
n I I I ? I I ? 1 I H
T ?yy I
rn 1>01
ICI
0 11
I? ? ?I y i I I( I! I ?
y C G aNr O O O 0? O Q? r ` p O O N g N D A 'O X, -0 9-0 9 m O -n m
O W
A S D Q 3° 3 a a a O M % v
N?q• ° O O Q Z
CL. 0
c -o o ' 0 -0
N o °. ° r 3 c; -. o n c o -ov :? 10 M. 70
1.0 0 g• o 0 o o O_ ° 2 c !r4
3 3 n ?: IQ m N G p p O S 0 p° 3 W p 7 C p 0 W C1 °p ° '? ~ O 'O O A p rn
p O 3 7C 3 O S a w S 3 a; Q 'O S C C S s S O :• 3
c C ?e 'a W°° u O p a s o a p° Q Sr- °- 3 a P A 3 o o 0
.3rt-io Q on rt° 3 Q Q. O S. O O' Q n O 0 ° C O° 1 a O
_p c K 3 o u . . 3= n p°
p C p p CL O x ?I
Q p x O °' 3
I Y it .
I ? II
0 B®MQ8 0 m0®oo®It?p see(DtSa®®©o13 0- I El II
• I ? ? II
I ^ JL
-°?'o o ??? b? na n??
7 7 o a 0 p o is Z r 3°
f° ``0. m r Z.14 `G O O w C 7
Q Q tr c 0°- 3 3 x 0 0 0
C 0 3 O 3 p
m to =° ' c S A
p O 3 °- Bpi ? ? O
?s 0- 3 .
07
C 3
Q. .
Q 7.
O
3 C
a
IIII! I
I ? I s" I ? 1V i'_?•'] I ?Q ?7
W W W nx u'
2
I I I I I +

?I H
I I I
I ?
I
ill
N N 4 Q x N N r 0 n
N 3 A S O m 0 m On- cr
CL. ° a
CL.
p O
3" TQ °
cn -1 ° O O Q_ a
c to
3 m 2 p c
Q S s
a c
.0 to
0 0
?. y
y; p
IAI b ?
rn m y n v C v m o v A nv o
3 Q Fn in n 3 h• " a n
-w p 7 Q. 3 ?. O 3 3 3 Q 7 a. 3 a. 3
m p p p ° A Q O A A Q A
3 3 rt g °? Q. •} $, Q. -« Q. Q. N °-k Q_ 10 Q_ O CL.
0 C) o- ca o-
C
p 3 O `
3 p 3 O A a A O 0 in
3 a C p' ?_ cn o, o o 3 o ° Z vs 0
.? 3 a m T 0 ° On O p p °
to
° n C Q a ` m Q• H C O N
° s g p ° s O C it •' p C
a s p a in y 0 m
70 p fn 3 3
N C
oo C in c .. in . . 0 3 1
I I I I I I I j I ? b l I ? I ?? I
.{ w I
O O < < ? A -? y N N N V'
O O < < r ?
I I I i ? i ? i i l i I I ??
s w.
0

X
n

o w
M.

d •0

. a

O

Q.
O a,

S

0

O
A
1 1 I I
I II ,
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I ?
I II '
I I I
I ?? I
n n x a
° Q a
7 p
A c N
C
3 ?` Q
Q
Q_
44

O I
I
I
x

I
N
30
O o
O
3 co o a c n s c c 0 c
3 3 O S, a 7 Q.
O S C Q C 3
a . .
a .
p '
C)
O
Z
M
Z
O
Z
D
r
N
C
m
I
N
c
N
C
A
M
9
Z
a
z
M
M

N
3?
G
O
r
CA
bis
C
y

rl rl C
r
x Eo coo I?I I I \?
IJ lJ

_TYP.dgn
3:z
r
if
1 ; 4 N

s, ,A
N
? H

y
_
[7 O
+
+ ?-
O
°
c ul
+ N
M s

s
S 0
? 0
Z
g
r
O ? O O ? 1m S? O V•

`?- o n U1
M C ? Q

°
?M

W

s
a
r
Zs
X .
<<> O
p p ?_
O ? O
v O v
v
r

D
? >
r
+ y m

O z a
y
D Z

Z m
O
oo

oi
CO ^
{v}-
m
x
Z z o
c -i c. m
N m
i 0
W ?
N i
?
< m m -0 -iW>IU m W>-0 D v D n
wa x a s xm-IM O miw 170 1A
ms w 7o O a O D? O O o
m• w -+ o z•oa"a z. -0a-u a? aw
1 S O r- Z. ?- Z• z• 2a
m ma <v O
4m
- z fD<
ic
0-0 D<
m<D as
<v DD
<v
>
a
Z1 o v m<D
=vOM • M 0O9 0-0 a
m • O N
D D o
I
.. i-aH
ZZ xx
D 64
Zpv lox
O Mx Z
v? m D D
o M0
Dm
v
1 1±
m Dm
r1v D• a•
1 D
x
:E-o m r © r
M
rr, - Dm-1 mw
++ ms r
m x z s
m V< s
Imo oa
MW -G s tt
vD 1
a
"' W-n>
"' M -n .D
Z1 i iy ND
+ -•D ?a
py m Z+x oar Z
x W(A Ww D
a OAD
1 r 1
r oOD
1 r V'O
x -410
x C
v<
mm a r1 mo r-1 rna rna m
11C w ra w0 1w r r

Hz
m
o
°
m 1
1
r M
W. 0
m . 0 °' m
' M
1 o vp mm x1vo o G
o
c 1mm s1 omx z z z
w x =Mm m mmm v0 on
x w a 1 w m 1 ms mw
1 m Z w m ow Dom Mm Mm
A 9 p -4
fo -
C Om w
m CD
D t1
<I a
M O
W
0
v "am . ° 2
c ,
> = w
+ . v o r

0100 mc
mm
zm
zmm
0
n
0
=am m 7D 0 z m m
I co D C

0 :2.
1 -4 mo
m
sm 0 - mm - w m

msm _
91
0

• w 0
1

m
11
i
? D
m o m
o
m
s0 w
_

m
!D <
M
w v? mm m
a
=a
a D

O y O
Q
?

Z
°
z o
w
P
O
m
O

N

r
.?
?
z
m
4

'v V
o M
^

8 -4
N O
D Z
w

w ?J
`
° a
N
Z
0

m
?H
Ywm
?n
NA
+ y
00 o
°o
iff
w -n
02!
O
a
y
v
m
n
c

* O < O

O to

z a
m
?z 0

0!J0 ° i

N z
°
C

+
p
O
Y r
Or
v
m
is 70
W
O Oe
? v
? th

C DD
_
r ++ l 1 m
b
ON ? 0 ?
`s
r ?
T8 N

?- °D °s °0
?+ I m,
.
+ Z M 1 (I L

Z
Y
O
_
O

b
0
z z
5/28/99
E

C' l.l'LVU9 VlGltl
•\ oadwa Pr \ne B3805_RDY_PSH04.dgn
-

W N
n

Lk
7-
f
4? 5
Y a
-
n
_ ?
g O v# '4e gg t0 ?o .>rn
'
t 3 0
A +
N r
> +-I-I
omy> o
St u> 11
q S It o
rn m 1 0 i n '
L i
•• 1
?? _ V 7ZC > m
n o -n I L y Z G
=
-4-4 r-
o
o
?W
_ Wm??
N 810
`I ?irar?v Z
_ _ _ . 0 (
*
a • o a R$ •. .. ` „x,22 y ZC * T
? v
y g
?
? Nam V
e m
/' • • ?
$ X02 g '"' -? I
i ft"
?
/?
/ i
a CI
o*C)

8/17/99
11

it z
m
? o
N
i
? a° , / r ? ? I I X22 `<
y00 I
0 r -k
ii A Bees \ \ ` c n O ($
4 oa+ i7 ? •a O ? O A ? ? ? o?
O to
?s I $ g
-YJM
1 I
N
SEA
O cpic?~O E ? '? ? A ?
?{$?1(W?W?vpNWNp?W ? o ?I rN- Q * O•?? R ? yr• Sa? 50 ? =1
/,• tOfVb vii ` W .,? •?i ?? A ~? C v Z
N1wN l11 $ a^ f `?/ W m D O
.gyp WJ-W N r 9 . F/1 '?I
m
• ? _ ..1 ... - .. _ .? - -B•CRAV? ?i mask Z ??`nr4'rJ` Z 7
O
Jul
I-X
31 IMP
JD 3n ill -n ;5
' , ? ? 69P? N . N \ \
- swev} R`,bu °BBrIJ •?, oc A ' . v
zs•BSrB °
ftl 2 I?1 O I I / ?r \ ?O cq?, \
ki?z 1 I ?_ ? n y Quo +;9' ?\ ???ti?•• Fy
2 Ell I? k 11 1 (A p r T a ,?0y ? ?\ °14 N N 9 T? B
47 toil ^ I I tiO I 8"0 ro \2 \\+< \
I I A y ' /: w \\ BOO x
44 X\
INN
16 %J rL
1 py \ \\ \ .
2 1*I
DD tj -k
SEA
xg0
(''r /dal I?l?ttl?,F,!-O I
z o o o ??1.0 i ?
w CA
r ,
y a or •
? ? Vl y ? I ? / ? ??' * 8 ? ? b??,??t?so 00 •Bttr
z ? c i?; .' ?o/ ? .. ?. ? II I sob???????'M?• r. 260c';SHl J
y O? 1 I / / J Zs•oo'?u
1
1
?mc t I cn?D?+?oDv cnz??oDv
? o
_m 1 1?? 8 rn n n n n u? ? n II n n II v? 8 -
?; No
rpI ,k
(N N V Li (A to Z4
m / w -I I
nm ?, II I, n n n Y n n n n n
~
My a tpo re oo o n „ woo o
0 A)
l
ai &,
ti
21
is
t .pop g ? p h?-IroD ? ?:bOD
o? ? y nl n u II n n n nnn n a n o e o ?
1.,. a w o N w ,.?
° I I Z Cho ?Q X°y? r 1?i°w$
`?t Qf (T
Z
N : I Z!
8/23/99
)CT-2004 07:19
t gd-.?7X%(fi §49RR_ROY_XPL_L.dgn i
XT-2004 07:20
ioodwa?TX ? §?QOR_RDY_XPL_L dgn i 8/23/99
? ? t' V ? y ?
CT-2004 07:21
?OdWOU\X \?, 8
4g5R_RDY-XPL-DRV.DGN
..+ AT Rf71

8/23/99
0
?m
00 x rri
4,
O
?o y s D rX??a ?? ??
°
o .
COm
z 70 0 /S4
°m W/ EL CSP
i-"- Ti -W (Tit 80 WS Ct
/Ald WAkO SEE ?E8 RpNS AP
ABC ,
A,
COWW
q?ONG -BY-
/ - -----??, o q L _--_-
/
N J ?p BUFFALO CREEK -?
X
-Da ? ? . • WOODS .. . .
/ D ? PO N n s T ARDOR IL T_ O
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
z - ----------
\ __- ------------
d?9?a•
OOp? RAIL R iP
Lv)
• Y O
/ / 1 \ I vO
1 \ 1
E 1 -?
'n
_O rn
/nj? 11 X11 I IO Z ?
/ , Izl ?• x r a
/ / 1 Z1 n N
/ / 1 WI X06: / fTl r O =T
J` 1 1
/ O 1 1 j a !y N C7LA
0
Z O ?, 0
/ \?c
z v,
00J' o
F \\ \\
?oo
\Q?\ ! 1
mm"
C=K:
vc?
9 l >
m o
.o
Fs 116
CD'JD
Opp
WD
s

' ? i f_?. ?'".'?_":.`-??•r."-?? __,_?;L ??` = x-?' x.,.,,, ` 'R'°""^°'_2240•--}`n??no,.-,n^,.
,?1 ?- _ ?;' ? ? =sue - `"eON,,.?-""_ - •.
/ rrtr `,r'L'tm0 _ ? eL2
I A,
It' i
{
r /f
°rr

. M1
"? •',
IF.
$€
8As qR.,
aEC ?
€
.r
ice.:..-'•: ?_,_.,_'-'-•- _ i
BUFFALO CREEK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
37
1
RAIL R ND
1 S i f s i ?? i f f/ \ ?' '' -• n.•^ ?02LZ„ a.n,
i f~'?,}?: / _,.r _r?\ \ I '} I. m'a„?_:.wtw,°„?„nm,nda""^- ?,_, `?^°'.,.n•!= - __ __.
i ? , rr,r{' ?.. i,:`..'r .. ?, d 5 _^-n nn? ? ,..-•tix - t/) -
01
rr -7
'.
%
\1V
f / /,?r 1 1
1. 4
? .? zcz I b
m
-? lY114
j Ix
r' .r? r tt? ? 1 y, ? ?d ?-•`? .? l?? X11 ? ? , l I/,I
/ / rr'?r' ,• . f,r? `/'a?2l i ',i' ?;r' ,td?r• rr' { I' 1,y 1 Z 1 j{ ? ? ,I 'q
l -I
!/r f ft?fr '' ?rtr'' r •;- m 5• (O1 / DI tl
111\\ 11 'Sr? z_ y.
;'?.!' ? '. j` /•?lt - r't' --•'^•,. `i•t f•9r?y I ? 'E i \ ? ' }r I
_ '' / f r r , i' • .f• / ? r?? ?? tt t,i a `Cy.' ?J ° ? \ rt \ 'y ?' __ ? .^-
_ ?, t r I41

7 tr ?
rLr-t1
l.N p J 1? ', i r 1
r m 1 t'
zol rl
r' ,: ! jt' -;ry `l-` t n ? i., ? \ iL ;` y ? 7 1 ? 3 t f ? ?• ? ? J -
?AJ?`y7'? rr' aea2 S ? .,.v __ '?, \\Q•\, "? ? i 1 m? i ?' ?! ?! 1;
r;';•.m ,{ 'I' .z ? - '"' ? _,4' ?-; „ ??..,?xk` -.. ??? `+4S.t ? '°???\ ??° Sti ' ?1 t ` ?? ? ? F ? ? ? ? ?' ? 0 ; ' /'1 ='' -.
/ ? ?' ?rrr.n - 4sy, '. ',,•\, _- ??/?' 4 • '`5 ,,\?i
r f
iJ' f` f rj' ? ',, 't,. ``••.t• ?., `'.? n •\ 't \ "? i.'' ? f? f !` ? ? ''t 't
r r r ?,>'- _ °t 'k. it t \ ¢@ cf }) t t,^
,?'? rr`=j r•J r D,.A _;`•;, .SM1y. ''t'y `'S \. ,? ? '''' ••'S i ? @ ` ` i f ? ( m
? f' t },f rt ("?D x't , 4 '•t F? I l ? \ 4 ? ?` I r i t ?l ? -F I ?1 "° Ri;
• t J i 0, • %='?t_ • - ' i .,. "' .`'? 41 5y ;? .,t,°?'a - `?' • I 1 . ':'r_ -h r r ;1 {
!J ti ti t '\ t\ N •t _ I?'? t? ''\ 1' f? j?,? ?? {t ? ? i'. ' ?'?
?•--m08ti r '''r' l "'t \' i 5i ?'S ?k '?'' t ?k. ?1'J, 1'1'?t f vrj/ t Val
(? ?. .? :..t e2 ll, t '+ ?a i ?, ttt 'fit \'" ~ `"?? '''? ?`? ` ",? ?' '4?r` l ? it ? ? ?iV •' ?h?t h. ? `'.?
,?•: ?r_ '° ?•' ?'' `.R om tt 't `'4 • N ?'? '''1 ? 'S a '? h { t ?5Q t 4 I ? ?
?_ (\ _: f ?.-?' ?--. _ '`' `?. 1 `? \ '? 'S4 - - ?1 i• k 4y? rt ?'''+ •;tti .?', - ??
-fJ_`? •'?• M1?-? t.x ''`5 5t } '',? ? y' t t,,'`, V, ['? '\t ' °tt.?' ??', `? ( ?
Y ? St '' '•'? x '''? 'i'? \ ,'ti ' ~'+x -,.??. `iy •tt N -
1 i
•x _
.r• _:y-"'-^"?1Yr j? - '? '?t \t ?, `? ? ? , ?•1,, Y~t - ? \ ' •t ', t V -'? ? ? ? °i
,r" i \, '.,t I 5, `,t .Si'q° ? '. '.. ,,1\ ,5 •55't y,L `•.,? _- •t '•?'?? 1 ??
PC)
,48G' .r'r rr -- ``'' \ ``t•`` ) t S r `5 V"
??4 ? ''? m ? ,,? ? ? - t,Y? 92'n .? .••?',?? \? ., ?:? \S',. t \ 4,1 ,`' ,? 'tit ''•,
4 N _ " ".,,? "x_44 4y„ '?'M,LV^.rr^' 't `''. t .5 •''`? ?. _ , .
:y 'nty„y„B6S 4 ? t .-•x.•:_ x '-•y.- `?y'•, a J1 ?\. 't '''4 1

---------------------------------------------------------------- r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

MC)

IN M

p?77 A 0-20p4 I :33
R?\?yd.eyQiea yermit\83885_prm_PFL.dgn 5/28/99
_--- N N ko.".
V
C
V
N N

O N
N
O b? N
N N
m
,

_ ............................................
bb 'mil

Ll k
r?n

I

L Y

a

... ..............

.
............... .
:::::::::::... N •4:
h

d ..
H
V.:

p ::'?:: ?:.????::r: .n:::

r:i:..

M -5: :
i
Er MfM w

n -

v m

•
D
v

R :
C

::::::
7t'G

::::::
ni..

:

. :::
::::::::::

: ..........

N' t
A6 °?.
m *`
i :,:?... ...
ii
iEiiN
?liiE
: ...(y .. .... .ni...

s

A

1 N
b N -"4 N
J N
'14 N N N
3
. , O G1? O' ? O t)? O ? O?

r. m?

v
3
r e?
Ashe County
Bridge No. 310 on SR 1507 (Stanley Drive)
Over Buffalo Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1507(2)
State Project No. 8.2712001
T.I.P. Project No. B-3805
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.. APPROVED:
IWfE Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD,
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
DATE Nicholas L. Grp, PE
Division Administrator, FHWA

Ashe County
Bridge No. 310 on SR 1507 (Stanley Drive)
Over Buffalo Creek -
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1507(2)
State Project No. 8.2712001
T.I.P. Project No. B-3805
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
DATE Karen B. Capps, PE
Project Development Engineer
DAT William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Replacement of Bridge No. 310
on SR 1507 over Buffalo Creek
Ashe County
Federal-Aid No. BRZ-1507(2)
State Project No. 8.2712001
T.I.P. No. B-3805
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT performed a threatened and endangered species survey for Virginia spiraea on
October 22, 2001. Habitat for Virginia spiraea is present in the project study area
although no species were present. Therefore, the survey must be updated by October 22,
2003 before the project Right of Way let on March 19, 2004 and the project construction
let on April 19, 2005.
PDEA Page 1 of I
May 16, 2002
a ? a
Ashe County
Bridge No. 310 on SR 1507 (Stanley Drive)
Over Buffalo Creek -
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1507(2)
State Project No. 8.2712001
T.I.P. Project No. B-3805
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 310 is included in the latest approved North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program and in the
Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The location is shown in-
Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified
as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
1. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 41.7 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered to be structurally deficient
and functionally obsolete. The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in
safer traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located just north of Warrensville (see Figure 1). The surrounding area is
rural in nature with some residential homes in the vicinity of the existing bridge.
SR 1507 is classified as a rural local road in the Statewide Functional Classification
System. This route is not a designated bicycle route and there is no indication that an
unusual number of bicyclists use this roadway.
In the vicinity of the bridge, SR 1507 has an .18-foot (5.6 meter) pavement width with 2-
foot (0.6 meter) grass shoulders (see Figures 3 and 4). The roadway grade is in a sag
vertical curve approximately 25.0 feet (7.8 meters) above the creek bed. The intersection
with NC 88 occurs in a sharp curve, causing poor horizontal sight distance.
Bridge No. 310 is a single-span structure that consists of steel I-beams with a timber deck
and asphalt-wearing surface. The substructure consist of a reinforced concrete abutment
on one end and an end bent composed of timber caps and piles with a concrete sill on the
other. The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1963. The overall length of
the structure is 51 feet (15.5 meters). The clear roadway width is 25.0 feet (7.6 meters).
The posted weight limit on this bridge is 14 tons for single vehicles and 17 tons for
TTST's.
Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corporation has aerial service east of the existing
bridge. Skyline Telephone Membership Corporation has aerial service east of the
existing bridge. There are no existing underground utilities in the project vicinity.
The current traffic volume of 200 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to 300
VPD by the year 2025. The projected volume includes one-percent truck-tractor semi-
trailer (TTST) and five-percent dual-tired vehicles (DT). The road currently does not
have a posted speed limit, therefore the speed limit is 55 mph by statute. There were no
accidents reported in the vicinity of the Bridge No. 310 during a recent three-year period.
There are no school buses that cross Bridge No. 310.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description.
The existing Bridge No. 310 will be replaced with a bridge that can accommodate a
minimum of two ten-foot lanes with two-foot offsets. The proposed structure will be at
approximately the same elevation as the existing bridge and will not alter the existing
100-year floodplain of Buffalo Creek.
B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
The two alternatives studied for replacing Bridge No. 310 are described below.
Alternative 1 (Preferred) involves replacement of Bridge No. 310 with a new 71-foot
(21.6 meter) long bridge just to the north of the existing bridge. The typical section on
the proposed bridge consists of two ten-foot (3.0-meter) lanes with two-foot (0.6- meter)
offsets. Improvements to the approach roadways will be required for a distance of
approximately twelve feet (3.7 meters) to the west and 185 feet (56.3 meters) to the east
of the structure. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during the majority of
construction. To accommodate the construction of the bridge abutment on the west-end
of the new bridge, traffic will be detoured on the old railroad bed currently being used for
TIP Project No. B-3109. Existing Bridge No. 310 will be removed upon completion of
the new bridge. The proposed new location of Bridge No. 310 does not improve the
horizontal sight distance at the intersection of NC 88.
Alternative 2 involves replacement of Bridge No. 310 with a new bridge 430 feet (131.1
meters) south of the existing bridge. The typical section on the proposed bridge consists
of two twelve-foot (3.7-meter) lanes with two-foot (0.6- meter) offsets. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridge during construction. There will be approximately 50
feet (15.2 meters) of new approach work to the west of the proposed bridge and 415 feet
(126 meters) to the east of the proposed structure. The horizontal sight distance at the
intersection of NC 88 is not improved with this alternative.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1507.
Rehabilitation of the old bridge is not feasible due to its age and substructure design. The
rehabilitation of the existing structure would require retrofitting the substructure for
heavier loads, scour, and new earthquake design criteria.
D. Preferred Alternative
Bridge No. 310 will be replaced on new location as shown by Alternative 1 in Figure. 2.
Alternative 1 is recommended because it minimizes impacts on the sensitive natural
ecosystems in the vicinity of the site and provides the most economical design. Also, this
alternative will have a minimal impact on the adjacent properties.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs for the two alternatives studied for the replacement of Bridge No.
310 are summarized in the table below.
ALTERNATIVE 1 ALTERNATIVE 2
Proposed Structure $ 139,760 $ 194,880
Removal of Existing Structure $ 11,000 $11,000
Approaches $ 149,774 $ 795,560
Misc. & Mobilization $ 84,466 $ 383,560
E & C $ 65,000 $ 215,000
Total Construction Costs $ 450,000 $ 1,600,000
Right of Way $ 41,500 $ 57,500
Total Project Costs $ 491,900 $ 1,657,500
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
The project study area lies in the Blue Ridge Mountain Physiographic Province in
northwestern North Carolina in the central portion of Ashe County. Topography in Ashe
County is hilly and mountainous with numerous peaks. Land use around the project area
is rural, forested and agricultural with scattered residences. Elevation in the study area is
approximately 2,760-2,850 feet (841-866 meters) above mean sea level.
A. . Soils
The two main soil phases found in the project study area are Evard Stony loam
and Evard loam. Both soils have slopes ranging from approximately 25 % to 45 %, with
Evard. Stony loam ranging as much as 60 % slopes. These soils have moderate
permeability and a very severe hazard of erosion. Neither of these soils are classified as
hydric soils. Therefore, wetlands, as defined in the -"Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual", 1987, were not present within the project study area.
B. Water Resources
Description
Buffalo Creek [DWQ Index no. 10-2-20] is the only surface water directly affected by the
proposed project and occurs in subbasin 050702 of the New River Basin. Parallel and
adjacent to SR 1507 is an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek that has the potential to be
affected by the bridge replacement, if the eastern approach is widened or improved.
Buffalo Creek is approximately 25 to 30 feet (7 - 9 meters) wide with a depth of up to 1.5
feet (0.5 meters) during the site visit. Wrack lines indicate that Buffalo Creek had
previously flooded and was likely four to six feet (1 - 2 meters) deeper than observed
during the field visit. Buffalo Creek contains a nice riffle/pool sequence and is
dominated by large boulders, rubble and sand. Buffalo Creek originates in the
mountains, southwest of the project site on Bluff Mountain. From the project site,
Buffalo Creek flows less than a mile before reaching the North Fork New River.
Best Usage Classification
The Division of Water Quality assigns a Best Usage classification of "C trout" to
Buffalo Creek. The "C" classification denotes waters protected for secondary recreation,
fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses
suitable for "Class C" waters. The supplemental "trout" classification is intended to
protect freshwaters for natural trout propagation and survival of stocked trout. There are
no waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1:
undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds) or
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) within 1.0 mi (1.6 meters) of the project study
area.
Water Quality
Buffalo Creek was sampled by the DWQ for benthic macroinvertebrates about 2.5 miles
upstream of the project site in 1993 and 1998 and attained a bioclassification of
"Excellent" and "Good-fair", respectively. This reach of Buffalo Creek is listed as "fully
supporting" in the New River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (2002), although non-point
sources may be the cause for decline in water quality ratings from 1993 to 1998.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the
NPDES Program. There is a single point source located within one-mile (1.6 km) radius
of the project study area. A private residence (John Medley Residence - NPDES
#NCG550500) is permitted to discharge less than.a mile upstream of the project site.
There are no AMS (Ambient Monitoring System) stations along this stretch of Buffalo
Creek.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Impacts to surface waters are anticipated as a result of construction activities. This may
include scouring of the streambed, siltation, runoff of toxic substances, and damage to the
stream banks. Limiting earth removal, vegetation removal, and in-stream activities best
minimizes impacts to surface waters. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters and Sedimentation Control Guidelines must be enforced
during the construction stage of the project. Utilizing the full ROW width of 60 feet (18
meters) anticipated impacts to Buffalo Creek would be 60 feet. Usually, project
construction does not require the entire ROW; therefore, actual impacts may be
considerably less.
Although Ashe County is considered a "trout county", due to the lack of fishery resources
in these waters, the Wildlife Resources Commission has not recommended an in-water
moratorium.
Bridge Demolition and Removal
Bridge No. 310 contains one span totaling 51.0 feet (15.5 meters) in length. The bridge
superstructure consists of a timber floor on steel beams. The substructure consists of one
reinforced concrete abutment and one timber end bent. The entire superstructure and the
timber end bent will be removed without dropping any of their components into waters of
the United States. However there is potential for the reinforced concrete abutment to be
dropped into waters of the United States. The resulting potential temporary fill
associated with the reinforced concrete abutment is approximately 31 yd (24 m).
NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR)
must be applied for the removal of this bridge. This bridge is classified as "Case 3"
where there are no special restrictions beyond those outlined in the BMP-BDR.
C. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section describes those
ecosystems encountered in the study area, as well as the relationships between fauna and
flora within these ecosystems. Five communities were found within the project
boundaries: maintained/disturbed, montane oak - hickory, acidic cove forest, riparian
fringe and perennial mountain stream. Dominant flora and fauna observed, or likely to
occur, in each community are described and discussed.
1. Plant Communities
Maintained/Disturbed Community
The maintained /disturbed community occurs along the existing road, abandoned railroad
(currently used as a paved walkway) and along a power line corridor. Low-growing
herbaceous plants such as various grasses and clovers (Trifolium spp.), aster (Aster
divericatus), beggars ticks (Bidens spp), hay scented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula),
heal-all (Prunella vulgaris) and Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota) were found along
the roadside. White pines (Pinus strobus), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), eastern
hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), Indian cigar tree (Catalpa speciosa), hydrangea
(Hydrangea arborescens) and smooth sumac (Rhus glabra) also grew beyond the road
shoulder. Residential plantings within the ROW include forsythia (Forsythia sp.) and
lilac (Syringa vulgaris). The power line area contained sprouts of adjacent roadside trees
along with golden ragwort (Senecio aureus), gentian (Gentian quinquefolia), running
cedar (Lycopodium flabelliforme) and Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides).
A disturbed. area adjacent to the abandoned rail receives occasional maintenance.
Cucumber tree (Magnolia acuminata), white pine, eastern hemlock, white oak (Quercus
alba), northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) occur as
dominant trees adjacent to the abandoned tracks. In addition, rhododendron
(Rhododendron maximum) and mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) and scattered
herbaceous growths of aster, goldenrod (Solidago spp.) and wingstem (Verbesina
occidentalis) are found.
Montane Oak - Hickory Forest
In the montane oak - hickory community, canopy constituents were comprised of
northern red oak, chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) and hickories (Caray spp.). The
subcanopy was dominated by black birch (Betula lenta) and ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana). Witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana) was the dominant shrub and
herbaceous growth was sparse. White pines were occasional and scattered. This
community sloped steeply down to Buffalo Creek. Along the slopes, tulip poplar, black
birch, sugar maple and scattered rhododendron grew with Christmas fern and galax
(Galax aphylla) dominat on the forest floor. Some areas of predominately white pine are
the early successional stage of the montane oak - hickory forest.
Acidic Cove Forest
This hillside community comprised little of the project site on the eastern portion of the
study area and a portion of it was maintained under the power line. Chestnut oak and
scarlet oak (Quarks coquina) were dominant in the canopy while rhododendron and
mountain laurel formed a dense shrub layer. Flowering dogwood (Corns Florida) and
maple-leaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium) were present on exposed, dry, rocky
hillsides.
4
? e
Riparian Fringe
The riparian corridor occupies a small fringe on either side of the creek. Because of
adjacent gradients, sloping away from the creek, this community is restricted to a narrow
band beside Buffalo Creek. The riparian community contains tag alder (Alnus serrulata),
silky dogwood (Corpus amomum), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), willow (Salix
humilus) and spiraea (Spiraea japonica). Herbaceous flowering plants including aster,
sneezeweed (Helenium autumnale), phlox (Phlox sp.) and jewelweed (Impatiens
capensis). Japanese grass (Microstegium vimineum) and panic grass (Panicum
scoparium) were also abundant. Buckeye (Aesculus octandra), sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis) and hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens) occurred on higher ground
contiguous to the riparian fringe.
Perennial Mountain Stream
Buffalo Creek is a mountain perennial stream that originates in mountains southwest of
the project site. This stream is sinuous with riffle/pool sequences and large boulders
dominating the stream substrate. Rubble, gravel and sand are also prevalent. Water
clarity was good at the time of the site visit and there was evidence of at least occasional
flooding (up to 4 to 6 ft higher than the 1-1.5 ft stage) during the site visit. Aquatic
invertebrates such as crayfish (order: Decapoda), mayflies (order: Ephemeroptera),
caddisflies (order: Trichoptera) and beetles (order: Coleoptera) were found instream. '
An unnamed (Ut) tributary to Buffalo Creek occurs within the eastern portion of the
Environmental Study Area and runs perpendicular to Buffalo Creek. After the Ut flows
under the abandoned railroad tracks, it joins Buffalo Creek in the northeastern corner of
the project. This Ut is 3 - 4 ft (1 m) wide and 1- 8 in deep (3 - 20 cm). Boulder, rubble
and gravel comprise the majority of the stream substrate. Swift, clear, well oxygenated
waters were observed in this creek. Stoneflies (order: Plecoptera), mayflies and
caddisflies were found in abundance under rocks and woody debris.
2. Wildlife
Terrestrial Fauna
Terrestrial fauna likely to occur throughout these communities includes Virginia opossum
(Didelphis virginiana), raccoon* . (Procyon lotor), white-tailed deer* (Odocoileus
virginianus), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus jloridanus), pickerel frog* (Rana palustris),
eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) and rat
snake (Elaphe obsoleta).
Avian fauna are likely to find a variety of habitat, water and cover at this site and would
likely be plentiful. Birds likely to occur in this area includes permanent residents such as
red tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus),
northern cardinal* (Cardinalis cardinalis), goldfinch* (Carduelis tristis), eastern phoebe
(Sayornis phoebe), chickadee* (Parus carolinensis), tufted titmouse* (Parus bicolor),

pileated woodpecker* (Dryocopus pileatus), downy woodpecker* (Picoides pubescens)
and Carolina wren* (Thryothorus ludovicianus). Migratory species that may use the area
for feeding and nesting likely include a diversity of warblers. In the fall, a Louisiana
waterthrush* (Seiurus moticilla), was observed by the creek and wintering ruby-crowned
kinglets (Regulus calendula) were also found.
Aquatic Fauna
The NCDWQ does not have specific information on fish in Buffalo Creek; however,
similar creeks were sampled in Ashe County and in the New River Basin. Fish that were
commonly found in these creeks and would likely be found in Buffalo Creek include
northern hogsucker (Hypentelium nigricans), fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare),
stoneroller (Campostoma anomalum), rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides), bluehead
chub (Nocomis leptocephalus), New River shiner (Notropis scabriceps), mountain
redbelly dace (Phoxinus oreas) and blacknose dace (Rhinicthys atratulus). A variety of
salamanders would likely be found in both creeks. Benthic macroinvertebrates as
previously mentioned were found in abundance.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each
community present within the study area. Project construction may result in clearing and
degradation of portions of these communities. Table 2 summarizes potential quantitative
losses to these communities, resulting from project construction. Estimated impacts are
derived using the entire proposed ROW. Usually, project construction does not require
the entire ROW; therefore, actual impacts maybe considerably less.
Table 2. Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Community type Alternate I (A) Alternate 2`(B)
`
Maintained/disturbed 0.30 (0.12) 0.22
(0.09)
Montane oak-hickory forest 0 0.29 (0.12)
Acidic cove forest 0.01 (0.004) 0
Riparian fringe 0.02 (0.008) 0.02 (0.008)
Total Terrestrial Impacts 0.33 (0.13) 0.53 (0.21)
Values cited are in acres (hectares).
Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering
habitat for various wildlife. Replacing Bridge No. 310 may reduce habitat for faunal
species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers on a temporary basis if the bridge is
replaced. in place or close by, however if the bridge is replaced on a new longer
alignment, it will be more detrimental to the terrestrial community as a result of
fragmenting plant and animal populations. In addition, detrimental impacts
(sedimentation) to Buffalo Creek may result from cutting through the mountain and
moving considerable quantities of soil if Alternate 2 is chosen. If Alternate 1 (replace
just north of existing bridge) is chosen, it is anticipated that impacts to fauna will be
minimal.
Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become road shoulders and early
successional habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the
roadway while attracting other wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat.
Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for
the species.
Direct impacts to Buffalo Creek would be equivalent for Alternates 1 and 2 since the
ROW width is the same (60 ft) for both alternates. However, bridge 310 will be replaced
with a bridge so that actual impacts will be substantially less than the stated ROW width.
Alternate 1 comes close to the Ut to Buffalo Creek but does not impact it.
Aquatic communities are sensitive to small changes in their environment. Although direct
impacts may be temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes
may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts often associated with in-stream
construction include increased channelization and scouring of the streambed. In-stream
construction alters the stream substrate and may remove streamside vegetation at the site.
Disturbances to the substrate will produce siltation, which clogs the gills and/or feeding
mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-feeders), fish and
amphibian species. Benthic organisms can also be covered by excessive amounts of
sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a stream.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction
site alters the terrain. Alteration of the streambank enhances the likelihood of erosion and
sedimentation. Revegetation stabilizes and holds the soil thus mitigating these processes.
Erosion and sedimentation carry soils, toxic compounds and other materials into aquatic
communities at the construction site. These processes magnify turbidity and can cause the
formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, thereby altering water flow and the
growth of vegetation. Streamside alterations also lead to more direct sunlight penetration
and to elevation of water temperatures, which may impact many species.
D. Jurisdictional Topics
1. Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United
States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Section 328.3(a).
Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR Section 328.3(b), are those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted
to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and must follow
the statutory provisions under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Based on these criteria, jurisdictional wetlands are not present within the project
? y .
boundaries. Buffalo Creek and the Ut to Buffalo Creek are jurisdictional surface
waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33,U.S.C. 1344).
2. Summary of Anticipated Impacts To Surface Waters
The anticipated total impact to surface waters from the proposed project is 60 linear feet
(18 linear meters) which is derived by using the entire proposed ROW width. Usually,
project construction does not require the entire ROW; therefore, actual surface water
impacts may be considerably less.
In addition, as previously mentioned, there is potential for components of the bridge
(reinforced concrete abutment and one timber end bent) to be dropped into Waters of the
United States. The resulting temporaryfill associated with bridge removal is
approximately 31 yd3 (24 m3). NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR) must be applied for the removal of this bridge.
This bridge is classified as "Case 3" where there is no in-water moratorium.
It is recommended that Alternate 1 be chosen where the bridge will be replaced
slightly north with an onsite (existing) traffic detour in order to minimize impacts to
forested habitat and natural stream buffers. Alternate 2 traverses very steep
terrain and would subject the slopes to severe erosion.
3. Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters and wetlands are anticipated. In accordance with
provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit will be required from the
COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States."
A Section 404 Nationwide 23 Permit is likely to be applicable for all impacts to waters of
the United States from the proposed project. This permit authorizes activities undertaken,
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed in whole, or part, by another Federal
agency or department where that agency or department has determined, pursuant to the
Council on Environmental Quality Regulation for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act:
(1) that the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which neither
individually nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment,
and;
(2) that the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished notice of the agency or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that
determination.
A North Carolina Division of Water Quality Section 401 Water Quality Certification is
required prior to the issuance of the Section 404 permit. Section 401 Certification states
that water quality standards will not be violated.
The USACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a
wetland and stream mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss" and
sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological
and physical integrity of Waters of the United States. Mitigation has been defined by the
CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing
impacts over time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR Section 1508.20). Each of
these three aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered sequentially.
The concept of `avoidance' examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of
averting impacts to Waters of the United States. A 1990 Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the USACE states that
in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts,
such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and
practicable in terms of cost, existing technology and logistics in light of overall project
purposes.
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the
adverse impacts to Waters of the United States. Implementation of these steps will be
required through project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically
focuses on decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of
median widths, ROW widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder widths. Other practical
mechanisms to minimize impacts to Waters of the United States crossed by the proposed
project include: strict enforcement of sedimentation and implementation of BMPs for the
protection of surface waters during the entire life of the project; reduction of clearing and
grubbing activity; reduction/elimination of direct discharge into streams; reduction of
runoff velocity; re-establishment of vegetation on exposed areas, judicious pesticide and
herbicide usage; minimization of "in-stream" activity; and litter/debris control.
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to Waters
of the United States have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible.
It is recognized that "no net loss" of functions and values may not be achieved in each
and every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required
for unavoidable adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable
minimization has been required. Compensatory actions often include restoration,
creation and enhancement of Waters of the United States. Such actions should be
undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site.
E. Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either
due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law
(under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that
any action, likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be subject
r '
to review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Other species may receive
additional protection under separate state laws.
1. Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. As of March 7,
2002, there are seven Federally Protected Species for Ashe County as depicted in Table
3.
Table 3. Federally-Protected Species for Ashe County
`SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Clemmys
muhlenbergii Bog turtle T(S/A)
B. Geum
radiatum spreading avens Endangered
Helonias bullata Swamp pink Threatened
Gymnoderma lineare rock gnome lichen Endangered
Houstonia montana (formerly
Hedyotis purparea var. montana) Roan Mountain bluet Endangered
Liatris helleri Heller's blazing star Threatened
Spiraea virginiana Virginia spiraea Threatened
Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion
of its range).
Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable
future throughout all or a significant portion of its range).
T (S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator)--a
species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is
listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
are not subject to Section consultation.
Clemmys muhlenbergi (bog turtle) Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance
(southern population)
Animal Family: Emydidae
Date Listed: June 4, 1987
The bog turtle is a small semi-aquatic reptile, measuring 3.0 - 4.5 in (7.5-11.4 cm) in
length, with a weakly keeled, dark brown carapace and a blackish plastron with lighter
markings along the midline. There is a conspicuous orange or yellow blotch on each side
of the head. This species exhibits sexual dimorphism; the males have concave plastrons
and longer, thicker tails, while females have flat plastrons and shorter tails.
The bog turtle is found in the eastern United States, in two distinct regions. The northern
population, in Massachusetts, Connecticut, southern New York, New Jersey,

Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware is listed as Threatened and is protected by the
Endangered Species Act. The southern population; occurring in Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Georgia is listed as Threatened Due to
Similarity of Appearance with the northern population.
This species is -listed as Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance, and is therefore not
protected under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. However, in order to control
the illegal trade of individuals from the protected northern population, federal regulations
are maintained on the commercial trade of all bog turtles. No survey is required for this
species.
Geum radiatum (spreading avens) Endangered
Plant Family: Rosaceae
Federally Listed: April 5, 1990
Flowers Present: June - early July
Spreading avens is a perennial herb having stems with an indefinite cyme of bright
yellow radially symmetrical flowers. Flowers of spreading avens are present from June
to early July. Spreading avens has basal leaves which are odd-pinnately compound;
terminal leaflets are kidney shaped and much larger than the lateral leaflets, which are
reduced or absent.
Spreading avers is found only in the North Carolina and Tennessee sections of the
southern Appalachian Mountains. Spreading avens occurs on scarps, bluffs, cliffs and
escarpments on mountains, hills, and ridges. Known populations of this plant have been
found to occur at elevations of greater than 5,000 ft (1524 m). Other habitat requirements
for this species include full sunlight and shallow acidic soils. These soils contain a
composition of sand, pebbles, humus, sandy loam, clay loam, and humus. Most
populations are pioneers on rocky outcrops.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Spreading avens is found at elevations greater than 5,000 ft mean sea level. Project
elevation is less than 3,000 ft msl. In addition, The NC Natural Heritage Program
database of rare and unique habitats does not contain records for this species in this area.
Therefore, replacing bridge No 310 will not affect spreading avens.
Helonias bullata (swamp pink) Threatened
Plant Family: Liliaceae
Federally Listed: September 9, 1988
Flowers Present: first half of May

Swamp pink is a perennial plant that grows from tuberous rhizomes. It has lance-shaped,
smooth, evergreen leaves that grow in basal rosette. Swamp pink has a hollow stem that
is topped with a short, dense, spike-like raceme of pink or purplish flowers.
The North Carolina populations of swamp pink are limited to bogs in the southern
Appalachians in Transylvania, Jackson, and Henderson counties. Swamp pink is found
in freshwater wetland areas including spring seepages, swamps, bogs, meadows, and
along the margins of meandering streams. This plant occurs in soils that are slightly
acidic with a pH of 4.2 - 4.9 standard units. Preferred soils are described as having a thin
layer of decomposed organic matter, underlain by a black to dark gray silty loam that is
slightly sticky, with many small roots and. fine mica chips. Populations are found in areas
with varying amounts of shade but populations in open areas are less vigorous due to
increased competition from other species.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Bogs and freshwater wetlands do not exist within the project study area. In addition, The
NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare and unique habitats does not contain
records for this species in this area. Therefore, replacing Bridge No. 310 will not affect
swamp pink.
?Gymnoderma lineare (rock gnome lichen) Endangered
Plant Family: Cladoniaceae
Federally Listed: December 28, 1994
The rock gnome lichen is a squamulose lichen in the reindeer moss family. The lichen
can be identified by its fruiting bodies, which are born singly or in clusters, black in
color, and are found at the tips of the squamules. The fruiting season of the rock gnome
lichen occurs from July through September.
The rock gnome lichen is a narrow endemic, restricted to areas of high humidity. These
high humidity environments occur at high elevations (4000 ft /1220 m) such as
mountaintops and cliff faces which are frequently bathed in fog or at lower elevation (<
2500 ft /762 m) deep gorges in the southern Appalachians. The rock gnome lichen
primarily occurs on vertical rock faces where seepage water from forest soils above flows
at (and only at) very wet times. The rock gnome lichen is almost always found growing
with the moss Adreaea in these vertical intermittent seeps. The major threat of extinction
to the rock gnome lichen relates directly to habitat alteration/loss of high elevation
coniferous forests. These coniferous forests usually lie adjacent to the habitat occupied by
the rock gnome lichen. The high elevation habitat occurs in the counties of Ashe, Avery,
Buncombe, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Mitchell, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, and
Yancey. The lower elevation habitat of the rock gnome lichen can be found in the
counties of Jackson, Rutherford and Transylvania.

BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
The rock-gnome lichen is an endemic and is typically found at elevations greater than
4,000 R mean sea level. Project elevation is slightly above 2,800 ft msl. Furthermore,
habitat such as vertical rock faces with seepage water does not exist in the project
boundaries. In addition, The NC Natural Heritage Program database. of rare and unique
habitats does not contain records for this species in this area. Therefore, replacing Bridge
No. 310 will not affect the rock-gnome lichen.
I-loustonia montana (Roan Mountain bluet or mountain purple) Endangered
Plant Family: Rubiaceae
Federally Listed: April 5, 1990
Flowers Present: June - July (best time is mid June)
Roan Mountain bluet is a perennial species with roots and grows in low tufts. Roan
Mountain bluet has several bright purple flowers arranged in a terminal cyme that are
visible from June to July although best viewing is mid June. This plant can be found on
grassy balds, cliffs, outcrops, steep slopes, and in the gravelly talus associated with cliffs.
Known populations of Roan Mountain bluet occur at elevations of 4600 - 6200 ft (1400 -
1900 m) mean sea level. It grows best in areas where it is exposed to full sunlight and in
shallow acidic soils composed of various igneous, metamorphic, and metasedimentary
rocks.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
The Roan Mountain bluet is typically found at elevations greater than 4,600 ft mean sea
level. Project elevation is approximately 2,800 ft msl and is too low for this species.
Furthermore, habitat such as mountain cliffs does not exist in the project boundaries. In
addition, The NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare and unique habitats does not
contain records for this species in this area. Therefore, replacing bridge 310 over Buffalo
Creek will not affect the Roan Mountain bluet.
Liatris helleri (Heller's blazing star) Threatened
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: November 19, 1987
Flowers Present: late June - August
Heller's blazing star is a short, stocky plant that has one or more erect stems that arise from
a tuft of narrow, pale green basal leaves. Leaves are acuminate and diminish in size and
breadth upward on the stem. Heller's blazing star has small lavender flowers that are
visible from late June to August, and its fruits appear from September to November.
Heller's blazing star is endemic to high elevation ledges of rock outcrops of the northern
Blue Ridge Mountains in North Carolina. Known populations of this plant occur at
elevations of 3500 - 6000 ft (1067 -1829 meters). Heller's blazing star is an early pioneer
species growing on grassy rock oucrops where it is exposed to full sunlight. Heller's
blazing star prefers shallow acid soils associated with granite rocks.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Heller's blazing star is typically found at elevations greater than 3,500 ft mean sea level.
Project elevation is approximately 2,800 ft msl and is too low for this species.
Furthermore, habitat such as high elevation ledges or rock outcrops does not exist in the
project boundaries. In addition, The NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare and
unique habitats does not contain records for this species in this area. Therefore, replacing
bridge 310 over Buffalo Creek will not affect Heller's blazing star.
Spiraea virginiuna (Virginia spiraea) Threatened
Plant Family: Rosaceae
Federally Listed: June 15, 1990
Flowers Present: June - July
This shrub has arching and upright stems that grow from one to three meters tall.
Virginia spiraea often grows in dense clumps, having alternate leaves, which vary greatly
in size, shape, and degree of serration. The leaves are green above and somewhat
glaucous below. The cream colored-flowers are present from June to July and occur in
branched, flat-topped inflorescences. Virginia spiraea is easily located during the
flowering period or late fall while herbaceous growth is minimal and the leaves are down.
Virginia spiraea is found in a very narrow range of habitats in the mountains of North
Carolina. Habitats for the plants consist of scoured banks of high gradient streams, on
meander scrolls, point bars, natural levees, or braided features of lower reaches. The
scour must be sufficient to prevent canopy closure, but not extreme enough to completely
remove small, woody species. This species occurs in the maximum floodplain, usually at
the water's edge with various other disturbance-dependent species. It is most successful
in areas with full sunlight, but can survive in shaded areas until it is released from
competition.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Preferred habitat for the Virginia spiraea such as high gradient scouring streams with
point bars does exist within the project study area. Virginia spiraea was not observed.
during a biological reconnaissance of the project study area in mid-October 2001.
Biologists walked the stretch of Buffalo Creek throughout the Environmental Study Area,
which encompasses both alternates. In addition, The NC Natural Heritage Program
database of rare and unique habitats does not contain records for this species in this area.
Therefore, replacing bridge 310 over Buffalo Creek will not affect Virginia spiraea.
.
2. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are 16 Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Ashe County as of March 7,
2002. Federal Species. of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the
Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Species
of Concern are defined as those species that may or may not be listed in the future. These
species were formerly candidate species, or species under consideration for listing for
which there was insufficient information to support a listing of Endangered, Threatened,
Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are listed as
Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program list of rare plant and animal species are afforded state protection under the State
Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of
1979.
Table 4 lists Federal Species of Concern, the species' state status and the presence of
suitable habitat for each species in the study area. This species list is provided for
informational purposes as the status of these species may be upgraded in the future.
Table 4. Federal Species of Concern for Ashe County
Scientific Name Common Name `State
Status Suitable
Habitat
Phenacobius teretulus Kanawha minnow SC yes
Sylvilagus transitionalis New England cottontail SR no
Thryomanes bewickii altus Appalachian Bewick's wren E no
Lasmigona subviridus Green floater E yes
Ophiogomphus howei Pygmy snaketail SR possibly
Speyeria diana Diana fritillary butterfly SH possibly
Speyeria idala Regal fritillary butterfly SR no
Stenelmis gammoni Gammon's stenelmis riffle
beetle SR no
Delphinium exaltatum Tall larkspur E-SC no
Euphorbia purpurea Glade spurge SR-T no
Gymnocarpium appalachianum Appalachian oak fern E no
Juglans cinerea Butternut W5a no
Lilium grayi Gray's lily T-SC no
Poa paludigena Bog bluegrass E no
Saxifraga caroliniana Carolina saxifrage SR-T no
Cladonia psoromica Bluff Mountain reindeer
lichen SR-L no
"E"-- An Endangered species is one whose continued existence as a viable
component of the State's flora or fauna is determined to be in jeopardy.
"T"-- A Threatened species is one which is likely to become endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
?• a
"SC"- A Special Concern species is one which requires monitoring but may be
taken or collected and sold under regulations adopted under the provisions of Article
25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes (animals) and the Plant Protection and
Conservation Act (plants). Only propagated material may be sold of Special
Concern plants that are also listed as Threatened or Endangered.
"C"- A Candidate species is one which is very rare in North Carolina, generally
with 1-20 populations in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by
habitat destruction, direct exploitation or disease. The species is also either rare
throughout its range or disjunct in North Carolina from a main range in a different
part of the country or the world.
"SR"--A Significantly Rare species is one which has not been listed by the Wildlife
Resources commission as Endangered, Threatened or Special concern species but
exists in small numbers and has been determined by the NCNHP to need monitoring
very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state, generally
substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction, direct exploitation or
disease. The species is generally more common elsewhere in its range, occurring
peripherally in North Carolina.
"W5a" A Watch Category 5a species is a species that has declined sharply in NC.
Since these species were once abundant, they may still be fairly common or frequently
encountered, despite the strong decline.
"SH" Of State historical occurrence in NC, perhaps not having been verified in the past
20 years and suspected to be still extant.
"-L" Limited range in NC and adjacent states (endemic or nearly endemic species)
"-T" These species are rare throughout their ranges (fewer than 100 populations total).
Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were any of these
species incidentally observed. A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of
rare species and unique habitats (May 1, 2002) revealed no records of Federal Species of
Concern in or near the project study area.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
There are no environmental commitments at this time other than using NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR
Part 800, Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account the. effect of their
undertakings (federally funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and afford the Advisory
Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.

B. Historical Effects & Archaeological Effects
On January 22, 2001, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed the subject
project. Subsequently, the SHPO recommended no architectural or archaeological
surveys be conducted in connection with this project (see attachment).
VII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope
and lack of substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of
Transportation standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
change in land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right of way acquisition
will be limited. No relocatees. are expected with implementation of the proposed
alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected
to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The proposed project will not require right of way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives
to consider the potential impact to prime farmland of all land acquisition and construction
projects. There are no soils classified as prime, unique, or having state or local
importance in the vicinity of the project. Therefore, the project will not involve the direct
conversion of farmland acreage within these classifications.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required. If vegetation
is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air
quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. This evaluation
completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of Title 23, Code of

Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (990 Clean Air Act Amendments
and the National Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environmental and
Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and
the North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section
revealed no underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Ashe County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. The approximate
100-year floodplain in the project area is shown in Figure 6. There are no practical
alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. Any shift in alignment will result in an
impact area of about the same magnitude. The proposed project is not anticipated to
increase the level or extent of upstream flood potential.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse
environmental impacts will result from implementation of the project.
VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS
None

2120

?
1337

t 1517 •>
Greer Chapel wam 1517 X10
P326 1382 KW. 167
_
1 1514 4 8
70
1341 ?? v
W 1348 1547 t642
OM
1352
Ashley
Chapel
7
1349
' t346 1351 ,"-?"- i6+?2
1644 AGS 19t3t
, 9
1341 1384 . g 1384
93 Oc3k
• Ch
11A0

?,.
34?
• 7
t347
.3 PHOENIX
-. 3 320
1 ?
" Drmwd
4200
Ook Groves
Ch.
r
.? + 1_: 44
Cl1%n
1500
coo.Z
t ?
310
I '•
49
MTN.
WatrrsnavilEe
194 • P4 5'j
s
.?
V---359 161 110
t'
EFFERSON
POP.IrW
1 ?
i ?
s part , s
J
113 ? , ?,1
994 } -----------
221
r• ?_ ' i7•
J PFERSON MT.
,. : woLw 4
N Rm
,?oF S+y?
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
^
?'?•, TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
?l
?OF TFIA?`:/ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
ASHE COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 310 ON SR 1507
OVER BUFFALO CREEK
B-3805

Figure 1
Looking North from the Bridge
Looking South from the Bridge
B-3805 FIGURE 3A
Looking East from the Intersection with NC 88
Looking West to the Intersection with NC 88
B-3805 FIGURE 3B
NC 88 Facing North
NC 88 Facing South
B-3805 FIGURE 3C

Temporary Offsite Detour for B-3109
North Face of Bridge
B-3805
FIGURE 3D

North Carolina Department of Cultural Regources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
January 22, 2001
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
From: David Brook avric?4 ` u n k-
Deputy State Histo Preservation Officer
Re: Replace Bridge No. 310 on SR- 1507 over Buffaloe Creek,
TIP No. B-3805, Ashe County, ER 01-7906
We regret that a member of or staff was unable to attend the December 14, 2000, meeting of the minds
for the project. However, on December 15, 2000, April l%lontgomery of our staff met with Karen Orrhner
with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) concerning the project. She reported
our available information on historic architectural and archaeological surreys and resources along with our
recommendations. Ms. Orthner provided project area photographs and aerial photographs. Based upon
our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we offer our preliminary
comments regarding this project:
In terms of historic architectural resources we are aware of no historic structures located within the area of
potential effect. We recommend that no historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our present
knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in
the National Register of Historic Places, will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore,
recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to the receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion or
Environmental Assessment, which indicates how NCDOT addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919 733-4763.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone] •715-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4613 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St. Raleigh 4618 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone] 9715-4801