NC0089656_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

COOPEA
FILE
CHAR 5oi v .
LEA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROUNA
010w, or 15AY&WOM"twowaft
Certified Mail # 7015 1520 0002 $386 8660
&qtgrn Recelot Reguested
February 28, 2019
Jason 3 Frost
DC Charlotte Plaza Ulp
3344 Peachtree Rd Ste 1800
Atlanta, GA 30326
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
`racking Number: NOV-2019-MV-0044
Permit No. NCO089656
Dimensional Place,
Mecklenburg County
Clear Permittee.
A review of the December 2018 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the
violation(s) indicated below:
onitoring Violation sl
Sample Monitoring
Location Parameter Date Frequency 7ype of violation
001 Effluent Base Neutrals & Acid (Method 12/31/2018 Annually Frequency Violation
625), Efflnt (76028)
001 Effluent Organics, Tot-Purgeables (Method 12/31/2018 Annually Frequency Violation
624)(76029)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The Division of
Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. if the violations are of a
continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may Irish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent`(SOC)
Noith Caroms Npvt , at d Ewets; Quafty E Dvosoo of Water s

tr.w
,If your a ..Y 4estidns concerning this matter or to apply for an SQC, please contact Edward Watson of
the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-66: -1699.
Sincerely,
W. Grey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Cc: WQSMooresville Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Compliance/Enforcement Unit - Enforcement file
rt row rat of Env-400menta!q yr # 0,4sioa of WSW Reswves
610 Ea t*r # nue, Suter 3011;Moves-WL., [ Srt�a �exoi

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
ecr tao,
Water Resources es S. JAY ZIMMERMAN'
Environmental Quality Director
March 1, 2017
�j
Mr. Jason J. Frost, Vice President W
QROS
DC Charlotte Plaza LLLP MOORESVUE REGIONAL OFFICE
191 Peachtree Street, Suite 500
Atlanta, GA 3030
Subject. Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO089656
Dimensional Place
1515 South Tryon Street, Charlotte 2 203
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Frost:
The Division of Water Resources (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject
facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 1 3-215.1
d the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.Environmental Protection
Agency dated October 15, 2007 or as subsequently amended.
Additional information for the engineering alternatives analysis (EAA) was received on December 6 ` d
12, 2016. Charlotte Water indicated that the Publicly Owned Treatment Works OT` does not accept
groundwater discharges per the City of Charlotte's Sewer Use Ordinance. The City of Charlotte's
lotte's
Engineering & Property Management Department indicated that the subject property has been approved
for stramwater discharge into the City's public stormwater conveyance system effective December` 12,
fit . The Division concurs that alternatives such as land application of wastewater, reuse, and a sewer
connection are coat prohibitiveand/or technologically infeasible as compared to a NPDES discharge.
Please note the following changes ftom the draft permit:
The monitoring frequency for "total Capper, "total head and Total Zinc is changed from quarterly
to Per Batch or Monthly with the addition of Footnote 7 as follows [see Part L Section A. (1)
A. (2.)1:
After securing ini urn of 12 sample analyses (sampling no more frequentlythan
2/month); the P ' nittee may submit a written request for the Division to reevaluate
monitoring conditions and effluent limitations.
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and
specify than if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then ;pe ittees must submit
DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Division anticipates that these
regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation.
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC D 's
Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to your DES
permit. [See Special Condition A. (3.)] for information on eDMR registering for eDMP and obtaining
an eIMR user account, please visit the following web page;
--5--�Notlunq Cotnpares:,-,k�
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center i Raleigh, North Carolina 7699-1617
919-707-9000

-g/web/wq/adrnin/bog/ipu/ednir.
?A's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the follow
compliance/proposed-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
ding.
Lrterek.den ard(a) ,ncdenr.gov] or call (919) 807-630T
espec Ily,
A
S. j
S. Jay Zimn h, DiZ
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure: NPICES Permit NCO089656 (Issuance Final)
hc: Central Files
NPICES Prrtratr Piles
ec: Richard Fanner [Richard.fanner(a),mecklenburgcant yne.govI
Aquatic Toxicology Unit/ Susan Meadows [[e-mail]]
Jason J. Frost, Cousins Properties, Inc. DasonfrostCa)cousinsproperties.com]
John M. Stewart, P.G., CPC, ECS Carolinas, LLP [JStewart] @ecslimited.conr]
C. Brian Smith, P.G., ECS Carolinas, LLP [[e-mail])
John S. Lair, P.G., ECS Carolinas, LLP [[e-mail]]

DES Permit NCO089656
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
ES
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 14 -215. 1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal 'Warr Pollution Control Act, as amended,
DC Charlotte lay
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Dimensional 1 Groundwater Remediation
1515 o fh Tryon Street, Charlotte 28203
Mecklenburg
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Irwin Creek in the Catawba River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, d other conditions set forth in Parts 1,
11 III, and IV hereof`:
The permit shall become effective March 1 2017.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on Jima 30 2020.
Signed this day March 1, 201.
Zimmerman, P.., Director
ivision of rater Resources
By Authority of the Enviromnental Management Commission
Page I of 11

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVE
1ES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation
F this issuance, any previously issued perinit bearing this
elusive authority to operate and discharge from this fail
e 'ents, terms, and provisions described herein.
DC Charlotte a s LLLP
edto:
.g a 0. 108 MGDdewatering and groundwater remediatio
yells
ser tanks
)rt
groundwater remediation system for p
tt nr fivaf rarknn tant-c
rt
within Subbasin 03-0 -34 JH C: 0305010301011 of the Catawba Diver Basin.
Page 2 of 11
truct un

DES Pe it NCO089656
PART I
A. L) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
1 5A NCACO2 .0400 et sect., 0 0 et sect.]
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until construction phase is
completed, the Permittee is authorized discharge pia Outtall 001. Such discharges shall be limited,
monitored and reported' by the Permittee as specified below:
t
Flow (MGD) 50050
0.108 MOD Continuous
Recording
E
Per Batch 5 or
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) C 0530
30.0 mg/L 45.0 /L
Grab
E
Monthl
4
Per Batch 5 or,
Turbidity U) 0 070
50 NTU 50 NTU
MVnthl
Grab
PB (so) 00400
6.0 and < 9.0 standard units Per Batch 5 or
Crab
E
Monthl
l;i Dichloroet a (Rg/L,) 6 34496
1 0 ggtL l001cg1L Per Batch 2'5 r
Crab
I & E
3Ylon&.I.lt
I„1 tchloroethylene ( gIL) 6 34501
1.5 in L 1.5 L Per Batch'5 or
'
Grab
I & E
Monthl
1,2 Dichloroeth (gglL) 6 32103
37 gg/L 371c /I., Per h"5 or
Crab
I & E
��ayt
Monthl
{) 21t76
Chlorofo L'
,g11 gg1L Per Batch or
17 17(1 Motathly
Grab
I E
Te chlor th lens L
y (ltg/) 79
fig/ Per .Batch or
3.3 L 3.3 L Monthly
Crab
I & E
Trtchloroethylene (µg/L) 91
Per Batch or
3 1c/L 3 lL Monthly
C
I & E
Oil and Grease (mg/L.) 00556
Per Batch 5 or
Grab
E
[EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEMI
Mon
Total Cower (Ag/L) 6,7 01042
Per Batch 51 or
Grab
E
Monthl
Total Lead ( g/L) 6,7 01051
Per Batch 5,7 r
grab
E
Monthl
Total Zinc (µg/L) 6,7 01092
Per Batch 5,7 or
Grab
E
Monthly
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)( g1L)7 00900
Per Batch 5,7 or
Grab
E
Monthl
Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity 7'- 6C"
Monthly
Crab
E
Organics, ics, Total Purgeables (V )Cs)
(EPA Method 624) (gg/ ) 6,9 76029
Annually
Grab
E
Base Neutrals & Acids (S i-VOCs)
6,9 76028
(EPA Method 625) ( )
Annually
Grab
Footnotes: See next page
Page 3 of 11

.,
r
.••
• _ � �
• � �
� �. � a�
_,
� •
� ► • •
� *♦
�� _• - _ • •
t
�' ' #
t; - • - - � �; r • +
� r • ; ®,
o _ � r * .�
� � _ � s
w' r
•'
1� � �
� * � •- �
r. " • � �
• � !
� ';
# +�
r

T: ES Permit NCO08 656
A. . ) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
15 1 NC AC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
During the period beginning upon post
construction and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge via Outfall 001.
Such discharges shall be limited, monitored
and reported' by the
Pertnittee as specified below:
....�
01
`
.
Flaw (MGD) 50050
0.108 MGD Continuous uo
Recording E
Per Batch 5 or
Total Suspended Sottds (TS) C0530
30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L
Grub E
Monthl
Batch 5 or
Tulbidity ( U) 00070
:5:0N=TU[ =50NTUPer
Montlsl
Grab E
Per Batch 5 or
1s8 (in) 00400
> 6.0 d -< 9.0 standard its
Grab E
Monthly
1,1 Dichloroeth , e (gg/L) 6 3 496
100 tt1/L 100 /L. Per Batch ,5 or
Grab I & E
Monthl
1,1 L�tchloroethylene (mg/L) 6 34501
1.5 mg/L 1.5 m Per Bath 'S or
OrI & E
Monthl
1, Dichloroeth e (gg/L) 6 32103
3'7 gg/L 3'7 gg/L Per Batch 'S or
Grab I & E
Monthl
Chloroform(gg/L) 6 32106
Per Batch " or
17f1 tcgiL 1?tD gg/L Monthly
Grab I & E
Tetrahlototylene (ttg1L) 6 7839
3.3 L 3.3 Per Batch ' or
Monthly
Grab I & E
Tr hloroethylene (gg/L) 7 391
gg/L ttg/L Per Batch or
Monthly
G b I & E
Oil and Grease (mg(L) 0556
Per Batch 5 or
Grab E
[EPA Method 1664 SG'T-HE I
iYzCBiitlil
Total Copp (µ ) 6, 01042
Per Batch 5,7 or
Grab E
Monthly
Total Lead (ttg(L) 6, 01051
Per Batch 5' or
Grab E
Monthl
Total Zinc (}xg(L) 6,7 01092
Per Batch 5, or
Grab E
MonthL
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)(mg(L) 11090o
Per Batch 5,7 or
Grab E
Monthly
Acute Isle Effluent Toxicity TGE6C
Quarterly erly
Grab E
bi—ganics, Total Purgeables (VOCS)
(EPA Method 624) (gg/L) 6176Ci29
Annually
Grab E
Base Neutrals & Acids (Semi-Vfi s)
(EPA Method 625) (gg/L),9 76028
Annually
Grab E
Footnotes.
1. Effective December 21, 2016, begin submitting Discharge Monitoning Reports electronically using NC
DWR's eDMR application system. See
Condition A. 5.).
'age 5 of 11

Page f

DES Permit NC O0896 6
A. . TOXICITY
5.A NCAC 02 .0200 et Seq.
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on rrrl basis using protocols defined as definitive EPA
Document EPA- 1 -R-02-012 entitled "Methodsfor Measuring the het Toxicity ofEffluents and Receiving
Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms."' The monitoring ;shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow
(Pime hales rromelas) 48-hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained
during representative effluent discharge d shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge
below all waste treatment processes.
The parameter code for Pl'ime' bales ro l is T 6C All toxicity test' g results required p ofthis
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR- for the month in which it was performed,
using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, I Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following
address:
Attention. North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water SciencesSection/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1621 Mal Service Center
Raleigh, forth Carolina 27699.1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days after
the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flaw from the facility during any month, the permittee will complete the
info anon located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number,
pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "tea Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Water Sciences Section at the address cited: above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
Wage 7` of 11

NPDES Permit NC0089656
A. (4.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL MONITORING (QUARTERLY)
[15A NCAC 02B .0200 et seq.]
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration" (Revised December 2010 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be performed as a
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. The effluent concentration at which there may be at
no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the procedure document). The tests will be
performed during the months of January, April, July and October. These months signify the first month of
each three month toxicity testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be perfoiuied at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring
will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DWR Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days after
the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No
Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Water Sciences Section at the address
cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Assessment of toxicity compliance is based on
the toxicity testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that begins on the first day of the month in
which toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues until the final day of the third month.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
Page 8of11

NPDES Pennit NCO0896 6
A. * ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS
[G.S. 4 -21 .1( )
Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (D Rs) and program
reports and specify than if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees
must submit monitoring data and reports electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
e final NPI ES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21 2015.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part 11 of this
permit (Standard C` ondations or° NPDES Permits):
• Section. B. (11.) Signatory Requirements
• Section D. (2,) Reporting
• Section D. (6.) Records Retention
• Section E. (5.) Monitoring Reports
1. Revorfln2 Reauirements f Sugersedes Section D. 12j and Section E. S. a
Effective December 21, 2016, the pennittee shall report discharge monitoring data electronically
using the NC; D 's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDi1R) rote et application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using li R. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter
monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's
eD1. R application is compliant with ETA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CROME ), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state'
electronically using eD R and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing,
signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed elaMR to the
following address:
NC DENR / Division of Water ResourcesWater Quality Permitting Section
ATTENTION: Central Piles
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 2' 699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the; facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband
access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted
d discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper D iR forms (MR 1, 1. 1, 2, ) or
alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing
address above. See "'How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below.
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the issuance of the permit or in the ease of a new facility, on the last day of'the month following the
commencement of discharge.
Starting on December 21, 2020, the pe ittee must electronically report the following compliance
monitoring data and reports, when applicable:
Page 9; of 11

NPDES Permit NC0089656
• Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports;
• Pretreatment Program Annual Reports; and
• Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) Annual Reports.
The permittee may seek an electronic reporting waiver from the Division (see "How to Request a
Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below).
2. Electronic Submissions
In accordance with 40 CFR 122.41(1)(9), the permittee must identify the initial recipient at the time
of each electronic submission. The permittee should use the EPA's website resources to identify the
initial recipient for the electronic submission.
Initial recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities means the entity
(EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES data [see 40 CFR 127.2(b)].
EPA plans to establish a website that will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for
each type of electronic submission and for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the
appropriate electronic reporting tool will be available as well. Information on EPA's NPDES
Electronic Reporting Rule is found at: http://www2.epa.gov/compliance/final-national-pollutant-
discharge-elimination-system-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
Electronic submissions must start by the dates listed in the "Reporting Requirements" section above.
3. How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting
The pennittee may seek a temporary electronic reporting waiver from the Division. To obtain an
electronic reporting waiver, a permittee must first submit an electronic reporting waiver request to
the Division. Requests for temporary electronic reporting waivers must be submitted in writing to
the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be
required under this permit to begin submitting monitoring data and reports. The duration of a
temporary waiver shall not exceed 5 years and shall thereupon expire. At such time, monitoring data
and reports shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is
granted a new temporary electronic reporting waiver by the Division. Approved electronic reporting
waivers are not transferrable. Only permittees with an approved reporting waiver request may submit
monitoring data and reports on paper to the Division for the period that the approved reporting
waiver request is effective.
Information on eDMR and the application for a temporary electronic reporting waiver are found on
the following web page:
http://deq. nc. gov/aboutldivi sions/water-resources/edmr
Page 10of11

M=_M1fMM=
The pennittee shall retain records of all Discharge Moo
records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at
may be extended by request of the Director at any tinu:
l ES Pe it NCO089656
re a
•
*
! "11
•
itoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These
least 3 years from the date of the report. This period
[40 C R 122.41].
Wage 11 of 11 `

DC Charlotte Plaza LLLP - Dimensional Place
NPDES Permit NC0089656
1515 South Tryon Street, Charlotte 28203
Receiving Stream: UT to Irwin Creek
Stream Segment: 11-137-1
River Basin: Catawba
County: Mecklenburg
Stream Class: C
Sub -Basin #: 03-08-34
HUC: 030501030101
35.215278° N,-80.857778° W
NC Grid: G 15NE
USGS Quad: Charlotte E, NC

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
M Page. 1 of:1 S
PART I
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES PERMITS "
Section A. Definitions
2/Month
Samples are collected twice per month with at least ten calendar days between sampling events 'These samples shall be
representative of'the wastewater discharged during the sample period.
3/Week
Samples are collected three tunes per week on three separate calendar days. These samples shall be representative of
the wastewater discharged during the sample period.
Act or "the Act"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act ( WA), as amended, 33 USC° 1251, ct
seq.
Annual Average
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges" of pollutant measured during the calendar year. In the case of fecal
colifonn, the geometric mean of such discharges.
Arithmetic Mean
The summation of the - individual values divided by the number of individual values.
1 ass
"lhe known diversion of wash streaans from any portion of a treatment facility including the collection system, which is
not a designed or established or operating anode for the facility.
Calendar Day
The period from midnight of one day until midnight of the next day, however, ror purposes of this permit, any
consecutive 24-hour perked that reasonably represents the calendar day may he used for sampling.
Calendar Wee
The period from Sunday through the following Saturday.
C°atendar (quarter
One of the following distinct periods: January through Match, April through June, July through S pte—tuber, and
October through December,
Composite Sam le
sample collected over a 24-hour perigee by continuous sampling or combining grab samples of at least. 100 mi. in
such a manner as to result in a total sample representative of°the wastewater discharge during the sample period. d. The
Director may designate the most appropriate method (specific number and size of aliquots necessary, the time interval
between grab samples, etc.) on a case -by -case basis. Samples may be collected manually or automatically. Composite;
samples may be obtained by the following methods:
(1) Continuous: a single, continuous sample collected over a`24-hour period proportional to the rate; of flow.
() Constant time/variable volume: a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over 24 hour period
of discharge and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of individual sample
collection, or
(3) Variable time/constant volume: as series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24 hour period with
the time intervals between samples determined by a present number of gallons passing the sampling point. Flow
measurement between sample intervals shall be deternimed by use of a flow recorder and totalizer, and the
preset gallon interval between sample collection fined at no greater than 1/ 4 ofthe expected total daily flow at
the treatment system, or
Version111091 011.1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions'
Page 2 of 18
of equal size and of no less than 100 millifti
Fre than once per hour.
ems whose detention time < 24 hours shall o
e.
hove.)
Large" during the calendar month,
ily sampling shall be sampled 5 out of every 7 days per week unless of
esources, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
ollowing all treatment processes from a water pollution control facility or othe
ted.
ronmental Management Commission
,nmental Protection Agency
that require coverage under this NPDES permit. Completion of facility closui
Version 1110912011.1

NPD13S Permit Standard Conditions
Page 3 of 18
Hazardous Substance
Any substance lcsignated under 40 CFR fart 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the C",WA.
Instantaneous flour measurement
The flow measured during the trunirnum time required for the flow measuring device or method to produce a result in
that instance. To the extent practical, instantaneous flow measurements coincide with the collection of any grab
samples required for the same sampling period so that together the samples and flow are representative of the discharge
during that sampling period.
Monthly Avera w f concentration hrnit)
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges"of a pollutant measured during the; calendar month. In the case of fecal
coliforrn or other bacterial parameters or indicators, the geometric mean of such discharges.
Ede it Isctin Aaatlaorit
The Director of the Division of Water Resources.
Quarterly Average concentration limit}
The arithmetic paean of all samples taken over a calendar quarter.
Severe ropert darnae
Substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, o
substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a
bypass. Severe property damage excludes economicloss caused by delays in production.
Toxic Pollutant:
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the CWA,
Upset
An incident beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee causing unintentional and temporary noncompliance with
permit effluent limitations and/or monitoring requirements. An upset does not include noncompliance caused by
operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive
maintenance, or careless or improper, operation.
We
ekl Averse concentration limit
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges" of a pollutant measured during the calendar week. In the case of fecal
coliform or other bacterial parameters or indicators, the geometric mean of such discharges.
Section B. General Conditions
l: Dut' to Com 1
The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any pert -nit noncompliance liance constitutes a violation of
the C;WA and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or
modification; or denial of a permit renewal application ; [40 CFR 122.41].
. The Permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the
CWA for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under section
405(d) of the C'WA within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions o
standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement.
b. The CW A provides that any; person who violates section[s] 301, 302, 306, 307 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or
any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under suction 402, or any
requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)( ) of the Act, is
subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $37 500 per day for each violation. [33 USC 131 (d) and 40 CFR
122.4 (a)(2)] ,
c. The C A provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 305, 318, or 405 of
the :Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402
of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section 402(aa)(3) or
402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,00per day of violations, or
Version 1110912011.1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 4 of 18
imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent
violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by
imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or' both. [33 USC 1319(c)(1) and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
d. Any person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal
penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both..in the
case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal
penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both.
[33 USC 1319(c)(2) and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit
condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of th.e Act, and
who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily
injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than
1.5 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a
person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or
both. An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA, shall, upon conviction of violating
the imminent danger provision, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and can be fined up to
$2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. [40 CFR. 122.41.(a)(2)]
Under state law, a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 per violation may be assessed against any person
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [North
Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A]
Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302,
306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any pert -nit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections
in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to
exceed $16,000 per violation, with the maximum atnount of any Class 1. penalty assessed. not to exceed
$37,500. Penalties for Class 11 violations are not to exceed $1.6,000 per day for each day during which the
violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class 11 penalty not to exceed $177,500. [33 USC
1319(g)(2) and 40 CFR 122,41(a)(3)]
2. Duty to Mitigate
The Permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in
violation of this peunit with a reasonable likelihood of adversely atTecting human health or the environment [40
CFR .122.41(d)].
g
Civil and Criminal Liabi
Except as provided in penn.it conditions on "Bypassing" (Part lt..C:.,4), "Upsets" (Part 1.LC,5) and "Power Failures"
(Part I1.C.7), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the .Permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities,
or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215,3, 143-215.6 or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC
1.31.9. Furthermore, the Permittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the
responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
4. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the Pennit,tee
from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Permittee is or may be subject to under NCGS 143-
215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USG 1.321. Furthermore, the Permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills,, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended.
5. Property Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive
privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal. rights, nor any
infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations [40 CFR 122.41(g)].
6. Onshore or Offshore Construction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical structures or
facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
Version 11/09/2011.1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 5of1
7: Se
vcgrabili
The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of
this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the
remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby [NCGS 150B-231.
8. Duty to Provide Information
The Pernaittee shall furnish to the Pernut Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the
Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or
terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee shall also furnish to the Permit
Issuing Authority upon request, copies of records required by this permit [40 CFR 122.41( )].
9. Duty to Reapply
If the Poarnittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after- the expiration date of"this permit, the
Pennitt e must apply for and obtain a new permit [40 CFR 122.41(b)].
10. Extiiration of Permit
The 'Pe ittec is not authorized to discharge, after the expiration date. In order to receive automatic authorization to
discharge beyond the expiration date, the Permittee shall submit such information, forms, and fees as are required
y the agency authorized to issue permits no later than 180 days prior to the; expiration date unless pertnission for a
later elate has been; granted by the Director. (The Director shall not grant permission for applications to be
submitted later than the expiration date of the existing permit.) [40 CFR 122 2l(d)] Any Permittee that has not
requested renewal at least 180 clays prior to expiration, or any Permittee that does not have a permit after the
expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will subject the Permittee to
enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS 143-2I5.6 and 33 I SSC" 1251 et. seq.
11, Signatory Requcre:rrrcnts
All applications, reports, or infortnation submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority shall be signed and certified [0
CFR 122.41(k)].
a. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a responsible
corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge
ofa principal business function, or any rather Berson who petafornas similar policy or decision Snaking
functions for the corporation, o (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating
facilities, provided, the rnanager is authorized to Snake management decisions which govern the operation
of"the regulated facility including having, the explicit or implicit duty ofmaking major capital investment
recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term
environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations, the manager can ensure that the
necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate inforniation for permit
application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the
manager in accordance with corporate procedures .
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking elected official [40 CFR 122,22].
b. All reports required by the permit and other inf'un-n tion requested by the Permit Issuing Authority shall be
signed by a person described in paragraph a. above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorizations specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation
of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant nia tiger, operator of well or well field,
superintendent, a position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall
responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and
() The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 12.22]
Version 1110912011.1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 6 of 18
,-evoked and reissued, or tennr
to revoke the permit.
Pollution Controls
e (ORC) who Possesses is
system;
m being introducer
f the proper type and grade; or
vacancy in the position of Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) or Back-up Operator
Responsible Charge Back-up ORC).
Version 1110912011.1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 7 of'1
(3) within seven calendar days of vacancies in both ORC and Back-up C)RC positions replacing; or designating
at least one of the: responsibilities.
The; t RC" of each Class I facility (or the Back -lap ORC when acting; as surrogate for the O C) must:
Visit the facility as often as is necessary to insure proper operation of the treatment system; the treatment
facility must be visited at least weekly,
Y Comply with all rather conditions of 1 A NCAC.µ 086 0 04.
The. ORC:, of each Class II III and. W facility (of the Back-up ORC, when acting as surrogate for the CIRC) must:
Visit the facility as often as is necessary to insure proper operation of the treatment system; the treatment
facility must be visited at least five days per week, excluding holidays
Properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the facility
Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 08G .fl` 04.
2.
I'rorser Qperation and antenar�c
The Permittee shall at all times properly; operate; and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control
(land related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the 'Pe;rnutt e to achieve conrpliannce with the conditions
of this permit. Prober operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality_
assurance procedures. This provision requires the: Permittee to install and operate backup or auxiliary facilities only
when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the pen -nit [40 CFR 122.41(e)].
NOTE.. Properly and officially designated operators are fully responsible for all proper operation and maintenance
of the facility, and all documentation required thereof, whether acting as a contract operator [subcontractor] or a
member of the Pe mittee's staff:
. Need to halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a Pen-nittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this permit [40 CFR 122.41(c)].
4. B assing, of Treatment l~acilitie
a. Bypass not exceeding limitations [40 CFR 122A 1, (m)(2)]
The Permitter may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause efficient limitations to be exceeded, but
only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. "These bypasses are not subject to the:
provisions of Paragraphs b. and c. of this section.
b. Notice [40 CFR 122.41(m)(3)]
(1) Anticipated bypass. If the Prmittee knows in advance: of the; need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice,
if possible at least ten clays before the date; of the bypass; including an evaluation of the anticipated duality
and effect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass. I he Pentrittee shall submit notice: of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part
II.E:.6. (24-hour notice).
c. Prohibition of Bypass
(1) Bypass from the treatment facility is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Pernrince for bypass„ sinless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage;
(B) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of"auxiliary treatment facilities,
retention of untreated wastes or maintenance daring normal periods of equipment downtime. This
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of
equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
( ) The Perinitt e submitted notices as required under Paragraph b. of this section.
(2) Bypass from the'collection system is prohibited and the Perrint Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Permittee for a;bypass as provided in any current or future system -wide collection system
permit associated with the treatment facility.
Version 1110912011. I

`he Permit Issuing; Authority may approve an anticipated bypass, aft
re Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the three col
I) of this section:
,erred and that the Pennittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
x facility was at the time being properly operated; and
,e submitted notice of the upset as required in Part 11. i .6.(b) of this permit.
ae complied with any remedial measures required under fart 11.13.2. of this pers
J40 CFR 122.41(n)(4)]; The Permittee seeking to establislh the occurrence of
•oof in any enforcement proceeding.
;s
r backwash, or other pollutants removed in the: course of treatment or control o
)osed of in accordance with NCGS 143-21 .1 and in a manner such as to preva
from entering waters of the estate or navigable waters of the Ginned States exec;
Permttee shall notify the Permit Issuing .Authority of any siuificant change it
onsible for maintaining adequate safeguards (s required by 1 A NCAC 02E11
of untreatedor inadequately treated wastes during electrical power failures eii
urces standby generators or retention of inadequately treated effluent.
and Records
ling
Version 1 1091 0 1.1

NPDES permit Standard Conditions
Page 9 of 18
NC DENR / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Permitting Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail `service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
3 Flow Measurements
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices shall be selected
and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. The
devices shall be installed, calibrated and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent
with the accepted capability of that type of device. Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows with a
maximum deviation of less than 0% from the true discharge rates throughout the range of expected discharge
volumes. Flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per year and maintained
to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted capability of that type of device.
The Director shall approve the flow measurement device and monitoring location prior to installation.
Onee-through condenser cooling water flow monitored by pump logs, or pump hour meters as specified in Pert I of
this permit and based on the manufacturer's pump curves shall not be subject to this; requirement.
4. Test Procedures
Laboratories used for sample analysis must be certified by the Division. Perrnittees should contact the Division's
Laboratory Certification Section (919 733-3908 or http;//pc»-tal.n detir,org/web/wq/l /cert) for information
regarding laboratory certifications.
s.
Facilities whose personnel are conducting testing of field -certified parameters only must hold the appropriate field
parameter laboratory certifications,
"rest procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the: E C regulations (published pursuant to NCGS
143.215.63 et. eq.), the; Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant to Section'
304(g), 33-USC, 1314, of the C A (as amended), and 40 CFR 1 fa; or in the case of sludge use or disposal,
approved cinder 40 CFR 136, unless otherwise specified in 40 CFR 503, unless other test procedures have; been
specified in this permit [40 CFR 12141].
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this permit, all test procedures must produce minimum detection
and reporting levels that are below the permit discharge requirements and all data generated must he reported down
to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure.. If no approved methods are determined
capable ofachieving minimum detection and reporting levels below permit discharge requirements, then the most
sensitive (method with the, lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must be used.
. Penalties for Tamt crina
The CWA provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate, any monitoring
device or method required to be 'maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a free of not
more than $10,000 per violation; or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both. If a
conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph,
punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years,
or both [40 C F`R 122.41 f.
f. Records Retention
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the Pe aittee's sewage sludge use
and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five years (or longer as required by 40 CFR
503), the Permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including:
v all calibration and maintenance records
Y all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
copies of all reports required by this permit
copies of all data used to complete the application for this permit
"These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample,
measurement, report or application, This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [0 CFR.
122.411,
Version 1110912011.1

NPDES Pen
cults
.411;
e of sampling or measuremi
led the sampling or measur
Conned;
led the: analyses,
iethods used; and
ponable times, any records
facilities, equipment (inclu
~ed under this permit; and
ts;
rents,
Herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of
this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of 1
itice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned p
CFI 122.41(1)]. Notice is required only when:
ion to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for
ion could significantly chant the nature or increase the qi
cation applies to pollutants subject neither to effluent limi
ms, under 40 CFR122.42(a)(1); or
Lo the Director of any planned chang
nee with the permit [40 CFR 122.41
vv -.. t-rcr a to i . r`kIAO b t-14MJ J UI NUtW ZStstcutu.
Version 1110912011,1

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page I I of 18
5. Monitoring Rc: nor is
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this pen -nit [40 CFR 122.41(1)(4)],
a. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR);(See Part II.1 .2) or forms
provided by the Director For reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices.
b. IF the Permittee monitors any pollutant more; frequently than required by this permit using test' procedures
approved tinder 40 CFR Part 136 and at a sampling location specified in this permit or lather appropriate
instrument governing the discharge, the results of such monitoring shall be included in the: calculation and
reporting of the data submitted on the DMR,
6: I we rely f2>ur l Iour ]ictac>rtin
a. The Permittee shall report to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office any noncompliance that
potentially threatens public Health or the; environment, Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the; time the Pennittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be
provided within 5 days of they time the Pentrittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission
shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period ofnoncompliance, including exact
dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to
continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, ;and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40
CFR 121 1(1)(6)].
b. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under this section if the oral
report has been received within 24 hours.
c. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency Response
personnel at (00) 6 -7 56 (00) 55 -0 8 or (91 ) 733-3300
7. Other Noraomtaliancc
The Pennittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under: Part II.E.5 and 6. of this permit at the
time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Park I I.E 6. of this permit
[40 CFR 122.41(1)(7)].
8, Other Information
Where the Permittee becomes aware that it t"aile d to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted
incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or
information [0 CFR 122.4I(l)(8)]
cl. Noncom liance Notification
Fire Permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional office of tile Division
as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first
knowledge of the; occurrence of any of the following:
ar -Any occurrence at the water pollution control Facility which results in the discharge of significant amounts of
wastes which are abnormal al in quantity or characteristic, such as the; dumping of'the contents of a sludge
digester; the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance through the facility; or any other unusual
circumstances.
Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility incapable of adequate:
wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass without treatment of all
or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report within 5 days following first
knowledge of the occurrence. Also see reporting requirements for municipalities in Part I .C.1c, of this pertint
10. Availability of Retaorts
Except For data determined to be confidential cinder NCGS 143-215. (a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal Act, 33
USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be: available for public inspection at the offices
of the Division. As required by the Act, effluent data shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly making any
False statement on any such report may result in tire imposition of criminal penalties; as provided for in NC GS 143-
215e 1(b)(2) or in Section 309 ofthe Federal Act.
Version 1110 12011:I

evaluation,
The report shall be sent to -
NC DENR / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Penns tin Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1,617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Version 1110912011,1

NPDES Pen -nit Standard Conditions
Page 13 of 18
PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Section A. Construction
a. The Pernrittee shall not commence construction of wastewater treatment facilities, nor acid to the plants treatment
capacity, nor change the treatment process(cs) utilized at the treatment plant unless (1) the Division has issued an
Authorization to Construct (AtQ permit or () the Peri ittee is exempted from such AtC permit requirements
under Item b. of this Section.
b. In accordance with NCGS 143- 15. I(a5) [SL 2011-394], no permit shall be required to enter into a contract for the
construction, installation, or alteration of any treatment work or disposal system or to construct, install, or alter any
treatment works or disposal system within the State when the system's or work's principle function is to conduct,
treat, equalize, neutralize, stabilize, recycle, or dispose of industrial waste or sewage from an industrial facility and
the discharge of the industrial waste or sewage is authorized under a permit issued for the discharge e of the
industrial waste or sewage into the waters of the State. Notwithstanding the above, the permit issued for the
discharge may be modified if required by federal regulation.
c. Issuance of an AtC" will not occur until Final flans and, Specifications for the proposed construction tion have been
submitted by the Pernaittee and approved by the Division.
Section B. GroundwateEjj2ajjQLjRg
The Permittec shall, upon written notice from the Director, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to
determine the conxplian e of this NPD S permitted facility with the current groundwater standards.
Section C. ChangesLhanges in Dischar es of Toxic Substances
The P rnuttee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to believe (40 CFR 122.42)
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of
any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the. following
"notification levels";
(1)'- One hundred micrograms per liter (100 tag/L)k
(2) Two hundred micrograms s per liter 2 0 pg/l_) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter
(500 ttg L) for ,4-di itroph nol and for 2-methyl,o-dig itroplienol; and one milligram per liter (I rng/L) for
antimony;
(3) Five times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non -routine or infrequent
basis, of a'toxic pollutant which is not limited in the pen -nit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the
hallowing "notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter 500 tag/L);
(2)One milligram per liter (I mg/L.) for antimony,
(3) Ten tinges the, maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
Section D.1 a i it C oasur R uirc en s
The Permittee must notify the Division at least 90 clays prior to the closure of any wastewater treatument system covered
by this permit. The: Division may require specific measures during deactivation of the system to prevent adverse
impacts to waters of the State. This permit cannot be rescinded while any activities requiring this permit continue at the
permitted facility.
Version 1110912 11.I

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 14 of 18
PART IV
ris in Part 11 of this permit, the following definitions apply to municipal facilitii
strial User
exits the POTW into waters of the State in quantities or concentrations which, alor
her sources, causes a violation, including an increase in the magnitude or duration (
any satellite POTW's, if different from the Pennittee) NPDES, collection system, o
,C 02H.0903(b)(23)]
reatment Wprks,(PQTW)
as defined by Section 212 of the CWA, which is owned by a State or local gave
lodes any devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycling and reclame
arks. In this context, the organization may be the ov
system into which an indirect discharger discharges.
X organization," [15A NCAC 02H :0903(b)(26)]
into a publicly owned treatment works and that [ 15
)er day or more of process wastewater to the POTW
wastewaters); or
non -significant categorical Industrial User,
Section B. Publicly Dwned Treat rat cirl� Pt}T s
Version 1110912011 . I

NPDES Peranit Standard Conditions
Page 15 of 18
All POTWs must provide adequate notice to the Director of te following[40 CFR 122.42(b)']:
1;. Any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW frog a an indirect discharger, regardless of the means of
transport, which would be subject to section 301 or 306 ofC A if it were directly discharging those pollutants;
and,
2 Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being; introduced by an indirect discharger as
influent to that PoTW at the time of issuance of the pernut.
3. For purposes of this paragraph, adequate notice shall include information on (1 ) the quality', and quantity of effluent
introduced into the POTW, and () any anticipated impact that may result from the change of the quantity or
quality of effluent to be discharged from the, POTW.
Section C . tttti l Co t t► ttf Pollutants frog Cndtt friar CJscr .
1. effluent limitations are listed in fart I of this permit. Other pollutants attributable to inputs from Industrial lasers
discharging to the -POTW 'may be present in the Pertnittee"s discharge. At such time as sufficient inforroation
becomes available to establish limitations for such pollutants, this permit may be revised to specify effluent
lintitations,for any or all of such lather pollutants in accordance with best practicable technology or water duality
standards.
1 Prohibited Discharges
a. The Permittee shall develop and enforce their Pretreatment Program to implement the prohibition against the
introduction of pollutants or discharges into the waste treatment system or waste collection system which
cause or contribute to Pass Through or Interference as defined in`15A NCAC 02H .0900 and 40 CFR 401 [0
CFR 403,5(a)(1)j
b. The Permittee shall develop and enforce their Pretreatment Program to implement the' prohibitions against the
introduction of the following wastes in the waste treatment or waste collection system [40 CFR, 403.5(b)]:
(1) Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the POTW, including, but not limited to,
wastestreams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade
using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21;
(2) Pollutants which cause corrosive structural damage to the POTW, but in no case discharges with pH lower
than 5.0, unless the works is specifically designed to accommodate such discharges;
(3) Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which cause obstruction to the flow in the POTW resulting; in
Interference;
(4) Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (B )i , etc.) released in a Discharge at a flow rate
and/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the POTW;
(5) Reat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in Interference, but in no
case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the POTW Treatment Plant exceeds 40°C (I04'F)
unless the Division, upon request of the POTW, approves alternate temperature limits;
(6) Petroleum oil, non -biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause
Interference or Pass Through;
(7) Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or futnes within the POTW in a quantity that
may cause acute worker health and safety problems, or
() Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge paints designated by the POTW.
c. The Permittee shall investigate the source of all discharges into the POTW, including slug loads and lather
unusual discharges, which have the potential to adversely impact the Permittee's Pretreatment Program and/or
the operation of the POTW.
The Pennittee shall report such discharges into the POTW to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office.
Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the Permittee became aware of the
circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the tune the Perinittee becomes
aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a description of the discharge; the
investigation into possible sources; the period of the discharge, including exact dates and tithes; if the
discharge has not ceased, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce,
eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the nonconiplianc ,
Version 1110912011.

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 16 of'18
3. With regard to the effluent requirements listed in Part 1 of this permit, it may he necessary for the Permittee to
supplement the requirements of the Federal Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR, Part 403) to ensure compliance by
the Permittee with all applicable effluent limitations. Such actions by the Permittee may be necessary regarding
some or all of the industries discharging to the municipal system.
4. The Permittee shall require any Industrial User (IU) discharging to the POTW to meet Federal Pretreatment
Standards developed under Section 307(b) of the Act as amended (which includes categorical standards and
specific local limits, best management practices and narrative requirements). Prior to accepting wastewater from
any Significant Industrial User (SIU), the Permittee shall either develop and submit to the Division a new
Pretreatment .Program or, as necessary, a modification of an existing Pretreatment Program, for approval as
required under section D below as well as 15A NCAC 02I1..0907(a) and (b). [40 CFR '122.44(j)(2)]
This permit shall be modified, or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to incorporate or modify an approved POTW
Pretreatment Program or to include a compliance schedule for the development of a POTW Pretreatment Program
as required under Section 402 (b)(8) of the CWA and implementing regulations or by the requirements of the
approved State pretreatment program, as appropriate.
Section D. Pretreatment Programs
Under authority of sections 307 (b) and (c) and 402(b)(8) of the CWA and implementing regulations 40 CFR 403,
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(14) and implementing regulations 15A NCAC 02H .0900, and in accordance
with the approved pretreatment program, all provisions and regulations contained and referenced in the pretreatment
program submittal are an enforceable part of this permit. [40 CFR 122.44(j)(2)]
The Permittee shall operate its approved pretreatment program in accordance with Section 402(b)(8) of the CWA, 40
CFR 403, 15A NCA.0 02H .0900, and the legal authorities, policies, procedures, and financial provisions contained in
its pretreatment program submission and Division approved modifications thereof Such operation shall include but is
not 'limited to the implementation of the following conditions and requirements. Terms not defined in Part 11 or..Part IV
of this permit are as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .0903 and 40 CFR 403.3.
1. Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
The Permittee shall maintain adequate legal authority to implement its approved pretreatment program. [15A
NCAC 02H .0903(b)(32), .0905 and .0906(b)(1.); 40 CFR 403.8(f)(1) and 403.9(b)(1) and (2)]
2. Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
The .Pennittee shall implement an IWS consisting of the survey of users of the POTW collection system or
treatment plant, as required by 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(i-_iii) and 1.5A NCA.0 02H .0905 [also 40 CFR I22.44(j)(1)],
including identification of all. Industrial Users that may have an impact on the POTW and the character and amount
of pollutants contributed to the POTW by these Industrial Users and identification of those Industrial Users
meeting the definition of S1U. Where the Permittee accepts wastewater from one or more satellite POTWs, the
IWS for the Permittee shall address all satellite POTW services areas, unless the pretreatment program in those
satellite service areas is administered by a separate Pennittee with an approved Pretreatment Program. The
Permittee shall submit a summary of its IWS activities to the Division at least once every five years, and as
required by the Division. The IWS submission shall include a summary of any investigations conducted under
paragraph C.2.c. of this Part. [15A NCAC 02H .0903(b)(13), .0905 and .0906(b)(2); 40 CFR 403.8(0(2) and 403.9]
Monitoring Plan
The Permittee shall implement a Division -approved Monitoring Plan for the collection of facility specific data to
be used in a wastewater treatment plant Headworks Analysis (HWA) for the development of specific pretreatment
local limits. Effluent data from the Plan shall be reported on the DM.Rs (as required by Parts I1.D and 11_ E.5.). [15A
NCAC 02H .0903(b)(16), .0906(b)(3) and .0905]
4, Headworks Analysis (HWA) and Local Limits
The Permittee shall obtain Division approval of a HWA at least once every five years, and as required by the
Division. Within 180 days of the effective date of this permit (or any subsequent permit modification) the
Pennittee shall submit to the Division a written technical evaluation of the need to revise local. limits (i.e., an
updated HWA. or documentation of why one is not needed) [40 CFR 122.44]. The Pennittee shall develop, in
accordance with 40 CFR 403.5(c) and 1.5A. NCAC 02H .0909, specific Local. Limits to implement the prohibitions
listed in 40 CFR 403.5(a) and (b) and 15A NCAC 02H .0909. Pursuant to 40 CFR 403.5, local limits are
Version 11/09/2011.1

j United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
i_ Washington, O.G. 2WO OMB No, 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code 1 NPDES yrtmo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
IN I L 1 NCO089656 I11 12 181121 0 7 1 # 1 2I 20LJ
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Elating B1 CIA Reserved
7 1.0 7012 1 71 � 72 7374 75a JStl
Section S: Facility Data
Nome and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time7Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPOES permit Numbed 11:30AM 18112/20 18/12/01
Dimensional Place
1515 S Tryon St Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
12:3OPM 18/12/20 20106/30
Charlotte NC 28203
Name(s) of Clnsite Representative(s)ITitles(s)1Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
flf
Christopher David OrreiVORCt704-200- 436t
Name, Address of Responsible Offi ialtTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Jason J Frrst,3344 Peachtree Rd Ste 1800 Atlanta GA 3061I404-407-18931
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement ■ Operations & maintenance N' Records/Reports
Facility Site Review ® EffluentlReceiving Waters Laboratory
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Edward Watson MRO CWIIt
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

PDEs y olday Inspection Type (Cont.)
3 NCO089656 11 12 18112/20 17 181
Section : Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On December 20, 2018, MRO staff conducted a compliance inspection of the Dimensional Place
de -watering and treatment system under permit NCO0896 Z6 and minor permit modification.
The system has been installed as described in the modified permit. A review of the treatment system
indicatesmidpoint sampling is available to the system operator as a'method of internal monitoring of
breakthrough of the primary carbon vessel. However„ the permit only requires effluent data to be
submitted. Please submit the October 2018 electronic Discharge Monitoring Report(eDMR) to the
Central Proccessing Center in Raleigh. a MR reports are expected to be submitted within 30 days
from the end of the previous month. A copy of the October eDMR was submitted via email to MRO
staff.
During the site visit, mention was also made that an Operations and Maintenance logs is required to be
kept for routine system maintenance, flow measure►rints and waste carbon manifests. The permitte
may use whatever means they chose to record the information, but the information is to be recorded
on monthly logs.
No calibration sticker was present on the effluent flow meter, Please provide a copy of the meter
purchase order to be used as verification that the meter calibration is within a year. This permit
indicates the effluent flow meter requires annual calibration.' Effluent meter calibration should also be
maintained in the OM logs book as this information is reviewed during site inspections.
The carbon vessel has a portal to be able to extract the spent carbon from the vessel. MRO staff
indicated that all waste carbon needs to be tracked via a waste manifest.
The outfall from the treatment system was reviewed during the site visit. No foam, color solids or odor
was observed during the site visit.'
1
Page## 2

permit NCO089656 Owner -Facility: Dimensional Place
Inspection [late. 1212012018 Inspection Type: Compliance: Evaluation
02erations & Maintenance
Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
❑
8
u
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCI T, Settleable
❑
0
0
El
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: A large area of the basement floor was covered with water due to a recent sump
failure. The sum alarm li ht was on during the site visit. A rep,latent surrig had
installed to allow water to be drawn down into the Burn well.
Permanent and back-up sum DUMDs are planned to be installed. The new um
Dump
been
s will be
directly connect to the main building control center. However MRO staff Was not
review the buildina control area and the connection to the control room has not vev
established, MRO staff has re uested to be notified'when the connectionnhas been
completed and to have Holder send photographs of the new DUMOS connected to
system,
able
to
been
the
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in S months or less). Has the perittee submitted a new
E
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
[�
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
®
El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
El
0
11
Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
N
❑
.®
El
Comment. During the site visit the MRO inspector reguested to be able to get access to the
main control room to be able to see how the system is able to be viewed by building
operations in the event of system failure. A skyj2g meeting is to be arranged in Janus
to be able to view how the s stem notifies building operations in the event of system
building
01
failure.
Page#
3

;i
United States Environmental Protection Agency Farm Approved.
EPA
Ili 1l Washington, D.C. 0460 COMB No. 040-0057
['tom Water Compliance inspection Repot t Approval expires 83 31-98
Section A; National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 �N � 2 15 1 NCO089656 ill 1 18/01/09 17 18t(� 1 j� t 0
211 t...Y.,t d [. .[ �,,, 8
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Bi OA Reserved
57 1.0 70 t 71 ID 1 72 1731 1 174 751 1 1 11 1180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry TimefDate Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 01:00PM 18/01/09 17/03101
Dimensional Place
1515 S Tryon St Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Charlotte NC 26203 03:30PM 18/01/09 20/06/30
Names) of Chairs Representative(s)/Tities(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
1//
Christopher David Orre[VORC1704-200-3436/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Jason J Frost,3344 Peachtree Rd Ste 1800 Atlanta GA 30326t/4 07-1893/
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
® Permit ■ Flaw Measurement operations & maintenance a Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program ® Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters n laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Edward Watson MRO OW///
Signature of Management C) A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

VFV
NPDES yrtmo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
31 NC rt o89656 11 12 18/01 /09 17 18 Li
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On January 9,2916,a representative of MRO performed a site inspection for the permitted dewatering
system with a groundwater treatment component that allows the collected water to be released to a
receiving stream under permit NC9069666:
The dewateringltreatment system was permitted with two components. The first component allows for
temporary dewatering during construction and treatment of the captured site groundwater that would
be treated with activated carbon and released to Irwin Creek. The second component is the permanent
subsurface drainage system and sump that would be similarly treated.
The site is currently in a transi tion phase between the temporary system and construction of the
permanent subsurface drainage system and sumps. An Engineer's Certification will need to be
completed for the installed permanent`dewatering system.
1
Page#

Permit: NC0089856 owner - Padll tDimensional Place`!• •
Inspection Date: 01/0912019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
'Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
■
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
C1
11
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
11
El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
El
11
C1
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
®
❑
El
11
Comment: MRO received the Final Contract Drawin Underslab Draina a Roe as built and
:pub rade Perimeter brain description information for the subsurface dewaterina
system by email after the site visit.
drain
fterations & Maintenance
Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
a
0
0
11
Goes the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
11
0
E
11
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Durina the ins ection it was mentioned that a re ul r O&M too book would need
maintained for system operations.
This loo should include carbon filter chancie out of spent carbon from the canisiters
to be
and
waste mainfests of the spent carbon.
During the site visit mention was made regarding the installation of a provision for the hllin
and extraction of the activiated carbon from the vessels.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
Is flow meter used for reporting?
N
0
El
Q
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
a
Q
11
1:1
Is the flow meter operational?
■
El
El
0
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: The flow meter was purchased new for the project and the MR4 is in receipt of the
purchase order to verify calibration.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
M
El
11
11
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
N
©
Q
0
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. re. required 5 years)?
1:1
0
0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0
0
Cl
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
a
Page# 3

Permit: NCO089656 Owner - Faculty: Dimensional Place
Inspection Date. 01/09/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record FCe42ing
Yes No NA NE
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are D Rs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
a
E]
1:1
0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
of the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) coo they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
1:1
❑
0
0
on each shift?
Is the CRC visitation log available and current?
9
0
El
13
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
8
El
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
13
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0
13
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Deport on file for review?
Q
Comment: ORC visitation records should be included in the O&M loci book.
All C.Q.C's should indicate that the samples are oreserved on ice:
Page#
4

t
m � 8 a u �
:- � _-�
�.
s
e
•.
..
�,;
,�
.$
' .�
V' x
�� ��
,; ,�
F
4 Y x
b .0 �`i
{
� � "� s � � z " ,#
a« , a
a �
� a
* a
.n � � ae �
'`' � j
*q i
1 '`
i.
t a.
e �� !
i
a e
n
3 �
9*
� � W S 4
C
� �
"�'
� w n n
w w
v t } w.
X
f t

PMVcIC4LL
POST OFFICE BOX 668710 ® CHARLOTTE;. C 28266-8710 * TELEPHONE [phone] TELEFAX (7t1) 8-2605
BR01HERS
INCz
`ounded I938
January 12, 2018
Aaron Schneider
Holder Construction
Re: Rules regarding dewatering well point construction
Dear Aaron;
I understand that you had a request for abandonment records for the dewatering well points that
were installed at Dimensional Place: Ihere are no abandonment or construction records for these
well points as they are not technically considered "wells" and therefore are not subject to the
same rules as water wells would be subjected. I have been through this before and it has been
vetted out with the proper agencies, but the word sloes not always travel throughout state and
county goveriunent, Let me explain how it works for you
As you know, these wells were installed as dewatering well points and their intended purpose
was to provide temporary construction dewatering to louver the water table to facilitate
excavation and construction of a basement level for the proposed building. While there are
volumes of rules and regulations on water supply wells and monitoring wells on both the state"
and county lever there is nothing specifically detailed in either the Mecklenburg County
Groundwater Regulations, or in the state's 15A NCAC 02C Well Regulations, that addresses
dewaterin wells (I have read the rules multiple times). : the 2C: rules have a short mention about
"temporary wells and all other non -water supply wells" (I5A NCAC 02C .01 8 (f)), but that is
about it. In fact, the only rule that specifically mentions "dewatering wells" is in the General
Statutes Chapter87, Article 7A, 87- 8.4(b)(5) in which dewatering activities are specifically
exempted by the NC Well Contractors Certification Commission (WC'C"C) from requiring
certification. At a meeting of the WCCC on September 9, 2008, this issue was discussed and the
commission ruled that Mecklenburg County did not have the authority to require certification of
contractors who installed these wells and, thus, could not require those contractors who were
installing these types ofwells and /car abandoning these 'types of wells to be certified well
contractors. They sent me a letter on this ruling and an informal opinion from their general
counsel on the issue. There are some conditions that roust be met for the exemption, but it was
the opinion of the WCCC and their counsel that dewatering wells that meet the terms of
exemption should not be classified as "wells" as defined: in the statute. The wells which we
installed. at Dimensional Place meet those requirements for exemption d thus certification
would not be required. All that being said, there is a pretty direct and logical path to follow on
this issue:

VFV
First, North Carol
" (a) C"ertif"rcatior
activity without l
Exempt ,persons t
activities." If yoi
dewatering wells
activity was exen
the September 9
for the installatio
y authority to
ua General Statute Chapter 87, Article 7A under section 87-98.4 (a) states that
Required — No person shall perform, manage, or supervise any well contractor
ing certified under thisArticle". Section 7-9.4(b) goes further to say "()
id activities -- This article does not apply to any of the following persons or
lookat number (5) under that section it clearly defines temporary construction
,nd the requirements associated with them. The WCCC supported that this
)ted from well contractor certification and thus no certification is required in
008 meeting. It should be clear to everyone that certification is not required
of dewatering wells or well points under this exemption and that no one has
quire certification for that activity.
Secondly, The Mecklenburg County Well Regulations specifically defines in their definitions
section what constitutes a "well", a "well contractor" and a "well contractor activity" (page 12 of
118). The "well" definition is straight out of the tate's 02C Well Construction Standards. A
"Fell Contractor Activity" is defined as "the construction, installation, repair, alteration or
abandonment of any well". However, " Well Contractor" is defined as "a person who undertakes
to perform well contractor activity, or who undertakes to personally supervise, or personally
manage the performance of a well contractor activity.. f .. in accordance with the well contractor
certification requirements of 15A NCAC 27 (which covers certified well contractors). Thus,
these rules define what a well contractor activity is, and then states emphatically that you roust
be a well contractor under 15A NCAC 27 to perform well contractor activities. As the WCCC
has exempted dewatering wells from certification (requiring certification), and only well
contractors can perform well contractor activities'according to the definitions, then by state and
county regulations, dewatering well construction cannot be considered a well contractor activity.
Thirdly, in every section of The Mecklenburg County Well Regu ations concerning permits
(Section III page 1, page 57, page ), it states that " It shall be unlawful for any person to
commence any well contractor activities in Mecklenburg County without first obtaining a
permitfrom the director." By county and state regulations and definitions, dewatering well
construction cannot be considered a well contractor activity. Thus, no permit can be required for
the installation of dewatering wells as long as they meet the exemption requirements outlined b
the WCC ' statutes. This is no different than other exemption under that statute (Section 7-
9 .4 (b) -12) such as hand augered holes by geologists or engineers, blast boles, mining
exploration holes, pilings or caissons, cathodic protection, etc. These activities are outlined in
the exact same exemption under the exact same scenario and for the enact same reasons. These
types of `holes" are not subject to well construction record or well abndo ent record
requirements for the exact same reason as dewatering wells I well points. They are not "wells"
per the definition because they don't require a certified well contractor for construction, and
therefore are not subject to these requirements.
Finally, there is no specific language in the Mecklenburg County Well Regulations that
specifically addresses "dewatering wells" or "dewatering activities". Their`rules address all sorts
of rather wells by name, but not dewatering wells. The WCCC has ruled that you can't call them
monitoring wells, or recovery wells, or anything rather than dewatering wells if that was the
intended purpose (read the statute). Thus, if you don't identify it, there is no way you can permit

V'
it. Certainly, the county can
squire permits for dewatering systems if they specifically address
mractt r activities", and they might even be able to write rules on
if they can or not), but at this point that has not occurred.
zll Brothers is not attempting to do an "end n" on the well construction and
or to employ construction techniques that would negatively impact the
construction of the dewater€ng well paints at this location closely mimic the
» of standard monitoring well (PVC factory slotted screens and casing, with
packs and bentonite seals). And we abandoned each well point by completely
pletel
.oved Benton to grout to ensure proper sealing and groundwater protection.
)l mimics the state's l 5A NCAC 02C Well Regulations, to ensure good
-ction. We just don't do any construction or abandonment records for these
oints as they are not technically "wells" and thus don't require this additional
.et me know if you have further questions.
f
{
J /J v[l
U Mike 2017\mfloyd\Dewatering 5tuf De aiering Wells Rules Clarification - Holder - 0112I .dare

VFV
(11) Installation of a wetland monitoring gauge at a depth of eight feet or less for
the purpose of monitoring fluctuations in the water table.
(12) Installation of a caisson, piling, or structural pier.
(13) A person who is licensed as a plumbing contractor under Article 2 of
Chapter 87 of the General Statutes who installs pumps or pumping
equipment; installs, breaks, or reinstalls a well seal in accordance with G.S.
87-85(6); or disinfects a well incident to the installation, alteration, or
replacement of pumps or pumping equipment within or near a well.
However, the plumbing contractor shall maintain documentation of having
attended a continuing education course that covered well seal installation,
protection, and sanitation within the last two years prior to the work being
performed, The State Board of Examiners of Plumbing, Heating and Fire
Sprinkler Contractors shall ensure that continuing education courses
covering well seal installation, protection, and sanitation are available to
licensed plumbing contractors during each six-month continuing education
course schedule. The licensed plumbing contractor shall remain on -site
while the work is being performed until the well is disinfected and <sealed.
(14) Construction, repair, or abandonment of a well used for the exploration or
development of oil or gas.
(c) Additional Exemptions. — In addition to the exemptions set out in subsection (b) of
this section, the Commission may exempt by rule a geophysical activity, construction activity,
or other well contractor activity from the requirernents of this Article if the Commission finds
that the activity has a negligible impact on the environment; public health, safety, and welfare;
and the groundwater resources of the State. (1997-358, s. 2-, 1998-129, s. 1; 2001-440, s. 1.1;
2005-386, s. 9; 2009-418, s. 1; 2014-4, s. 16.)
G.S. 87-98.4 Page 2

t
�n.
ItOY COOPED
Governor
MIICHAEL S. REGAN
'w
Secreta t:y
Water Resources LINDA CI. LP PPER
Environmental Quality Interim Director
January 24, 2018
Mr. Jason Frost, Vice President
DC Charlotte Plaza LLLP
191 Peachtree St Suite 500
Atlanta, GA 30303 RE: Compliance Inspection Report
Permit #NCO089656
Dimensional Place
1515 South Tryon Street, Charlotte 28203
Mecklenburg` County
Dear Mr, Frost,
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection conducted at the
subject site on January 9, 2018 by MRO staff. The MRO would also like to extend a thank you to Aaron
Schneider of Holder, Chris Orrell and David Valentine of ES. Please advise the staff involved with this
NPDES Permit by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report..
The MRCS is requesting the following information to be submitted:
Please complete and return the attached Engineer's Certification.
Should you have any questions, please contact Edward Watson at (7 4) 663-1 99 ext. 2198, or by email
at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Edward Watson, Hydeogeologist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDE
CC: WQROS, Central Office
Chris Orrell, ECS limited LLC (Via email)
Aaron Schneider, Holder (Via email)
Stag of North Carolina j Environmental Quality 1 Water Resources Water Quality Regional operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding (Le., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES
1 I I 2 LI 3 I NC0069656 1 1 1 121
2'1111 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating
67 It
70
yr/mo/day
18/01/09
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
117 18 I I 19 I I 2011
111111111111111166
B1 QA -Reserved --
© 72 ( N I 731 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number)
Dimensional Place
1515 S Tryon St
Charlotte NC 28203
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
/a
Christopher David Orrell/ORC/704-200-3436/
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiaVTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Jason J Frost,191 Peachtree St Ste 500 Atlanta GA 30303//404-407-1893/
• Permit
• Self -Monitoring Program
Entry Time/Date
01;00PM 18/01/09
Exit Time/Date
03:30PM 18/01/09
Other Facility Data
Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
III Flow Measurement MI Operations & Maintenance
Facility Site Review 111 Effluent/Receiving Waters
Records/Reports
Laboratory
Permit Effective Date
17/03/01
Permit Expiration Date
20/06/30
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)
Edward Watson
Signs re of Manage ent Q A Re'iewer
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
MRO GW///
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
.\ , Zvi
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPOES yrtmoldsy Inspection Type (Cont)
31 N 00898 5 ill 121 18/01/09 117 18 I n j
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Can January 9, 01 ,a representative of MRO performed a site inspection for the permitted dewatering
system with a groundwater treatment component that allows the collected water to be released to a
receiving stream under permit NCO089.
The dewatering/treatment system was permitted with two components. The first component allows for
temporary dewatering during construction and treatment of the captured site groundwater that would
be treated with activated carbon and released to Irwin Creek. The second component is the permanent
subsurface drainage system and sump that would be similarly treated.
The site is currently in a transition phase between the temporary system and construction of the
permanent subsurface drainage system and sumps. An Engineer's Certification will need to be
completed for the installed permanent dewatering system.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0089656
a Date: 01/09/201 B
Owner - Facility: Dimensional Place
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less), Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Yes No NA NE
El 11
II ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ II ❑ ❑
II ❑ ❑ ❑
III ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: MR© received the Final Contract Drawing , Underslab Drainage Pipe (as built) and
Subqrade Perimeter Drain description information for the subsurface dewaterinq drain
system by email after the site visit.
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: During the inspection, it was mentioned that a regular O&M log book would need to be
maintained for system operations*
This log should include carbon filter change out of spent carbon from the canisiters and
waste mainfests of the spent carbon,
Yes No NA NE
•❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
During the site visit, mention was made regarding the installation of a provision for the filling
and extraction of the activiated carbon from the vessels.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Yes No NA NE
II ❑ ❑ ❑
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ •❑
Comment: The flow meter was purchased new for the project and the MR© is in receipt of the
purchase order to verify calibration.
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Yes No NA NE
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
II ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
Page#

Permit: NCO089656 Owner+Facility: Mmenaionai Place
Inspection Date: 01/09/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes No NA N
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete, do they include all permit parameters?
11
0
El
El
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
11
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MUD permitted fto ) Do they operate 4!7 with a certified operator
❑
El
11
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
11
❑
Is the ORC certified at gradeequalto or higher than the facility classification?
11
❑
E
El
Is the backup operator certified at one; grade less or greater than the facility classification?
11
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDRS permit available on site?
11
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
[
11
❑
Comment: ORC visitation records should be included in the O&M Igg book,
All C.0,0's should indicate that the sam les are reserved on ice.
Page#
4

MICE
LINr
Waterfit esources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY
Permittee: DC Charlotte Plaza LLLP
NPDES Permit / COC Number: NCO089656
Count: Mecklenburg
Engineer's Certification:
1, ---, a duty registered Profess
in the State of North Carolina, as authorized by the Permittee to observe [ daily, part tin
the construction of the project,
Project Name
Location
do hereby state that to the best of my abilities, I practiced due care and diligence to obsery
of said project such that it was advanced and completed in accordance and in compliance i
Permit, approved plans and specifications, Authorization to Construct Permit, and/or Gent
Certificate of Coverage issued by the Division of Water Resources.
Signature
Registration No.
Date
[Stamp]
[Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any apply
report, plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of
Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with or knowingly i
any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article
the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdei
by a fine not to exceed $10,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. [18 U.S,
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years,,
similar offense.]
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality � Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 906 6300

764

January 24, 2018
Mr. Edward Watson
Water (vitality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
North CarolinaDepartment of Environmental Quality
610 E. Center Ave, Suite 36
Mooresville, NC" 28115
Dimensional Place
NPDES Permit NCO08965
Lear Mr. Watson,
This permit outlines a temporary dewatering and groundwater remediation system during
construction and a permanent system for past construction. The temporary dewatering system
consisted. of 34 recovery wells and three 1,000 gallon transfer tanks while the permanent system
uses a sub -slab dewatering drainage system draining to'two sump and using sump pumps.
After receiving this permit, Holder Construction used the 34 recovery wells to dewater the site
while we excavated the basement and installed the permanent sub -slab drainage system. The
temporary wells around the site were in conflict with the underground utilities that were
scheduled to be installed. Once the permanent sub -slab drainage system was complete on
9/18/17, we switched the dewatering system over to the permanent system while continuing to
use the temporary remediation system. We will continue to use this dewatering and remediation
configuration until the permanent remediation system has been installed near the end of this year.
There have been no issues with the system in its initial 'state or in the current state and we believe
the intent of the permit has not been violated at any time
If you or anyone else have questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact me at
(704) 4 6-4760.
Respectfully submitted,
kl�' V.441�-
Aaron Schneider
Senior Engineer
Helder Construction
Holder Construction Company
2359'Perimeter Pointe Parkway / Suite 250 / Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 /- 704 35T4200
www,holderconstruction.com

RF1 Transmittal
DATE: 4/27/2017
ID00476
connecting the perimeter drain to the underslab drain my not be possible if the
connection is made beneath the pile caps/foundation wall as suggested. If the
contractor would like this option considered, it should be demonstrated and
verified that the re-routed connection will allow a minimum of 1% fall between the
perimeter drain and the defined uncle slab drain elevations on the drawings.
FROM
r- -1- - -111-11--l-1- --
NAME
-111-1-- ----T -- ------ - ----------- ------
COMPANY EMAIL PHONE
Paul Koska LS3P [e-mail] [phone]
--- ---- ---- -- ...... . ...
TO
NAME ..... ......
COMPANY EMAIL PHONE
------
- -------
Holder
Aaron Schneider
Construction [e-mail]
Company
DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS
QTY i DATED
TITLE NUMBER SCALE SIZE
1
4/20/2017 Hydroduct Coil 600 and
Connector T Detail.pdf i
. .. . . . .....
1
4/20/20RF1 Attachment -
17
Perimeter Drain Detail odf
COPJES�
David Loy
(LS3P)
Wade Tucker
(LS3P)
Jason Frost
(Cousins Properties)
Marc Plotkin
Jim Sears
(Williamson &Associates)
Page 2 of 2

L"5" P , RFI Transmittal
L3P 1 227 Nest Trade Street Suite 700 Ch dotte NC 28202 United States
PROJECT: Dimensional Place DATE SIT: 4/27/2,017
9102-15: 970
SUBJECT: 5,ubgrade Perimeter Grain RF110 1 FI 10
Confirmation Subgrade
Perimeter Grain
Confirmation
TYPE: FIR TRANSMITTAL ID0047
PURPOSE: Answered VIA: Info Exchange
QUESTION: Typical detail 3/A-5 0 and UD-102 depict a drainage pipe through the
foundation wall that connects the below grade waterproofing drainage
board to the underslab drainage pipe system. + Per the waterproofing
contractor and the manufacturer, this detail is not recommended to move
an indeterminate amount of ground water to the inside of the building.
The waterproofer has also expressed concerns regarding installation of
the adapter fitting to the blindside of the drainage board. Typically the
pipe is connected to the outside of the drainboard as shown on the
attached <detail page.
Holder recommends installing a perimeter foundation perforated drain
pipe with 4"° diameter laterals every " that run under the foundation wall
to connect to the unerslab drainage pipe system as shown in the
attached detail.
Please confirm this is acceptable. Please specify diameter size of the
perimeter drain pipe.
SUGGESTION:
ANSWER: From a waterproofing perspective, no exception is taken from the
recommendation. However, note the response below from Marc Plotkin at ECS
which indicates verifying that the necessary slope can be achieved with the
dewraterirg inverts
From EC
The wall penetrations for perimeter drains shown on the UD drawings are common
and do not require a redesign of the underdrain system as proposed by the
contractor.
In addition, the assertion of undetermined flow is inaccurate and incorrect. On this
project, EC:S does not object to using a 4" diameter perforated collector pipe
around the perimeter of the foundation as suggested by the contractor; however,
Page 1 of 2

PV
Water t" Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form
"4 PCSOCC
CAC 1 SA 8G .11201
Per ittee Owner/Officer Name: - i
Mail n Addr s;
City-. State: Zip: _ Plra>ne
Entail add s.
Signature: Date: t t"1
#p.................. #...##.. .............................. .:............. ...............................................................
Traci ity 1"darinet Permim
.t
County:
#P.....#......p#.#.#...p#.ikk.#.11...bP:..W.C.YP#W#..#..#...1..i1r..Y8#..AFM#..pRM#.p.##.Y.#..RF#etpp.....##BY.I...#M.Y..b##A.s.Y..s..m#e#.M.YM.a6.Yx..t...#.#qt
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE SYSTEMI
Facility eeCONLY ONE):
Ph sie `cSurfaceIrrigation
Land ApplicationBiological Collection
.................... ........ ....t..................................#......... .........................sa#P............ #......... ............
#.x
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
Print Full Name. Email: ^�
Certificate Type l Grade Nu ber: Wor Ph one #.
Signature:Date:
*"1 certify that 1 agree to my designation as the Operator in Responsible Charge far `the facility noted,1 urulerstand and will abide by the rules
and regulations nin to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth In 1$A N AC 0801 0204 and biting to do so can result in Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certiflcati mrnlssi .'
..#..#.........................#.......#...................................#....................r..........a..........................................
Sae :Tap Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC)
Print pull Name: Jr Ernai1:
Certificate T' f Grand t N her- Work Phone #:
Signature. Date.
1`1 certify that 1 agree to my designation as a Hack -up Operator in Responsible Charge for the "lity noted.1 understand aral wvill by the
rules d regulations pertaining to the responsibilities ofthe RU ORC as set forth in 1$A NCAC 08G .0205 and falling to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the rater pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
...................................................................................................................... 0.....................
Mall, fax or email the WPCSOCC, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 2'7t699-1618 Fax: [phone]
rl lrt l to. a 1. ` e ad 1 gdttnr; ov
.call orfax ar gm to the Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh
appropriate Regional Office: 2090 US Hwy 70 225 Green St 610 E Center Ave 1900 Rareeett Dr
Swvannanoa 28778 Suite 714 Suite 361 Raleigh 27609
Fax. 82 .299.7t143 Fayetteville 28301-5043 Mooresville 29115 Rare: 919 571.4718
Phone, 929.296,4540 Fax. 9tg.486.0707 Fax: [phone]{ 40 Phooc:919.791.4210
Phone:91Q.433°33Ut1 Phone [phone]"
Washington Wilanington Winston-Salem
i t. �t t � �r ��' 943 Washington S Fall 127 Cardinal Dr 45i1 W, Hanes Mall Rd
Washington 27889 Wilmington 2840 --2845 Wiu do Salem27105
Fax: V52.946.9215 Fax. [phone] Fax: 3 6.776.9'797
hone 252,946.6481 Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Revised 06-2015
WQR0
v t.F` . (S V) N A L 0F Fit

FPPV
#,VPCSOC'C Operator Designation Form, cant:
Facility Name: Permit##:
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC)
Print Full Name: trail:
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: Work Phone #:
Signature: }ate:
"I certify that I agree to any designation as a Backup Operator its Responsible Charge for the facility noted, I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BUORC as set forth in I NCAC 08G M05 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
...................... ........ ............ .............................
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC
Print ;Full Name: Email:
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: Work Phone #:
Signature: Date:
" I certify that I agree to nay designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set fords in I SA NCAC 08G 0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
....................................................................>:..............................................................
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC)
Print Full Larne: Email:
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: Work Phone #:
Signature: bate:
"I certify that I agree to any designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control Systern Operators Certification Commission."
................................................................................ .........
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC)
Print Full Name: Email:
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: Work Phone #:
Signature. mate:
441 certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility netted, I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities ofthe BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G .0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Revised 05-05

L
F
package.
The Submitte statement on
the back oLthe Discharge Monitoring Report. in most cases, the Submitter will be
the Owner but may be other delegated individuals. The Submitter must be an
individual with delegated signatory authority. If individuals other than the duly
authorized person for the Owner have been delegated signatory authority, the
V:
permits, the Owner should verify that all permits
from the report, the Owner should conduct a
ame. Any discrepancies detected must be
ority form (located on the eDM R Forms and
ithorized, as described in paragraph I above, to
A who will be given Submitters permission, If a
)WR, then include a copy with your application
I 1W11% VW111VI MIVW v V W.1 -- -.- -- ....... . — .—
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Fax: or Email: or US Postal Mail:
[phone] [e-mail] Information Processing Unit
Attn: eDMR Registration
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NC eDMR Registration Form (Revision 4.1) Instructions ii

PPPF'P'
Watson, Edward M
From: Bell, Wes
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 8.26 AM
To: Watson, Edward M
Subject: FW: NC00896S6 - Designation Farm
Attachments. NCO089656 Find 2017.pdf
fyi
From: Denard, Derek
Sent. Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:36 PM
To. Kinney, Maureen <Maureen. [e-mail]>
Cc: Bell, Wes <[e-mail]>, Williamston, Jenee <jenee.williamston ncdenr.gov>; Emerson, Veronica
<veronica.emerson @ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: NCO08 656 - Designation Farm
Derek C Denard
Environmental specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
d r k denar c n cl flr.c o
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting section W NPLEs
1617 Mail service Center
Raleigh, NC 2799-1617
�r"tf ing Crnpi r e
Email correspondence to and from this address is su4ject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and n7ay be disclosed to third parties,
From; Kinney, Maureen
Sent: Tuesday, March 21,=2017 :33 P
To: Lenard, Derek derek.denard ncdenr.gov>
Cc: Bell, Wes <wes [e-mail]>; Wilhamston, Jenee [e-mail]>; Emerson, Veronica
<verc nica.ernerson ncdenr.gov>
Subject. RE. NCO0 9656 - Designation Form
t

Can you send me an electronic copy of this permit for review. It needs to be classified in BIMS so the permittee can
designate operators. I'll need to review it.
Thank you,
Maureen
From: Williamston, Jenee
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 1:53 PM
To: Emerson, Veronica <veronica emersonaDcjenr,gav>
Cc: Kinney, Maureen <Maureenn Kinneye ncdenr.gov>
Subject: FW: NC0089656 - Designation Form
Maureen Ms. Emerson is trying to update this form but there is no classification in the system. Please advise, thank you.
2

PPPFP'-
WPCSOCC
Senee Williamston
Processing Assistant Ili
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Operator Certification Program
919-707-9089 office
19-715-27 6 fax
enee iIIiamston@ncderir.r ov
Mailing: Physical:
1618 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street 1209J
Raleigh, NC 2769 -1618 Raleigh, NC 27604
& M- I -'I''Nothinq Compares
Ernail correspondence to and f rcnrrt this address is Subject to the
North Carohna Pablic Records L awand may be disclosed to third, parties.
From Emerson, Veronica
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 1.50 P
To: Williamston, Jenee <ignee,\Milliar gon an d nr. ova
Subject: FW: NCO099656`- Designation Form
Hello Jenee,
I have received the okay to proceed with processing this registration from last week.
From: Emerson, Veronica
Sent. Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:35 AM
To: Williamston, Jenee <jgnee.williarslstes>
Cc: Scott, Michele <mich ;le.scott ncdenre ova
Subject. NC 7089656 - Designation Form
Hello Jenne
Isere is a recent request for operator designation. Thank you for processing this request.
Mrs. Veronica Emerson
Information Processing Assistant 1
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
19-807-64 a0 office
3

Pppppp'
19-807-6�498 fax
Veron ica, rn r cn c M_ncder r. ct
1617 Mail Service tenter
Raleigh, NC 7699-1617
wCompares_­_,
Email corrpspondence to and from this, addressis subject to Ote
North Carolina Public RecordsL att, and may be disclosed to thud parties
4

,f i(
y ,qq
2.7
-�-}-
C4)
2) �2)
X1.7' _/,
\ /�',AOp",�. 8-p',, 8'_0' 1-0' 46-167/16" 7'I 915i18'-0'13 .6 8'_4'�8 .6. 8 _?•
�Y) . _ �r► +► A
{ AAA r , 712.00 r` `o,.
i' 1 yg a o•` i. o, Q 712.40 a _ r71100 712.20 & �"
�r
kk_`711,50 711,25 712.37 g..
��
712.36 _ _
IX
712,
rc
712.3&
>>
" fr`+iC7. : �ffw ff �^'',;+��) .".. 4 � l � � y ,r �•.r'1 \ . ` '. ,ir .'x s\� f �, +� ' s,„rlTiS.\ 2 � pr'` .. '
\ a
d'. ado- "' � � ,' . \ ••.'' O ^ .. �, �
r
712,97 f % \ 13.27
o E
ff
(Y4)
/ >"'. �. �,. °� ) 11 Syr ({(/
714.67,
713,87 °- ' - '�71
8
713/j.9ai' �� � '""� �, �"� `� �
Y6 �. \ Z6
F�. N ° t
(J
�4)
.ff "' `per /J '•.. r ? .•�$,.6
\� l
714 67" \GREEN DASHED LINES ARE THE
A�
A6
Y8 PERFORATED PIPES UNDER SLAB
y 6 ,
Dimensional Place
Project Number 000000000000
HOLDER DER .. . Date 4124/ 7
Underslab Drainage Shop Drawings
Holder Construction Company
3333 Riv rwood Parkway Suite 400
Atlanta, GA 30339
scale I" = 40°-0"

wwmw+wrvNwrw.
4
R: t
1TT
LS P
,� Me
MOW mar.
u
x
,. ,
72
Each well 5 deg
% * _ _:: .< F . ,: ,'_ '^� .x°, ^„n .<n„ •.:,,: ,. "'., w t� et&t � k�, riea97a C'. �+
to
sae SM60,s. r,w
€
l
o" s y*
u
sR
c raa >u,, w b m. of t
' r- �► a l
wEEJ'4* ,. "�• .s„ as
€h,
f R
ui
t
t
nt'
k
4
M
f #pr
yg
yy
'+.'I,,jg
� 56 r STe
x
n w�„ #
��
x w
tu
114,
s
t
,
a.
"
n
n,
„
,„,,:
s f } 6 ,. s a^,.hy ' q: fr s` z, � � � ,Y.' ,y4 t^4* i w �,a�"`. .iM" f r -+^ o •"' K"k>Mw,., t
v
.,
n
a ,h... I, ri = ,„,,. ...n. „•>_�.'"".,.., „ ^ awn^'...-".e ."'t"^.: h. `x5 ` :., _ ra,.dao-g ir:
,
EROSION
n„
'^`�� r+ww wiMe eur Air atr► MrM aMM Mel w� aer Mrt ■Ir ., ' M,eeM irM � frwM riM Mrr Mr M� +�►�' - », .. <, .�� ,�. �, a , : � �. aar�aa�x
s'p
f4)3
WINaem.�n wnree. ++v
aar;_. F a +naa .....n.„ _ ,t, _, ,l y, r
,^ . � 4t S�aau+�es#
PHASE 11
a
^,. ctasaWe _ ;;,4 .• �9 ec'sas IM"�&mRLY k
' l , : � `' rs�sc t�i"s P�A�,
�� 4
C-401

— — -------------
[CC SINS
BENTONTTE WATERPROOFING (09 AS SHOWN RENTON TE WATERPROOFING (OR AS SHOWN COORDINATE ALL-TOAENTONITE WATERPROOFING DCA AS SHOWN
I W *Cousins
ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) ARCHITECTURAL A STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) -j
CONCRETE SLAB
VAPOR BARRIER
FABRIC FLAP
E OPL$CCE -PLASTIC
DRAINAGE COMPOSITE (TO EXTEND FROM AT MINIMUM Z' SACKFILLNON
BELOW FINISH GRADE TO I ABOVE 90TTOM OF FOOTING`,
A MATERIAL (AS
LAGGING ROARAS RECOMMENDED IN THE DIMENSIONAL
GCOTECHNICAL REPORT,' PLACE
4 FABRIC
DRAINAGE
E DRAINAGE CO
COMPOSITE 1
4` MINIMUM WEEP DRAINAGE PIPE OOLVC
FACING WALL
(WITH FASIZIC t.
SOE 4
4PERFMATEE,
PVCPIPE
4'PERFORATED SLAR CONSGETESLAB
VAPOR
BARRIER
pvPIPE
CONCRETE
VAPOR BARRIER !�n url"T'N", F-K BENTO$CALLASAEQU1kEb Y<
"im ', i COMPACTED FILL OR
WATERIOO ANVFA -111 - NATURAL SOILS
REA
mj
DRAINAGE FILL J l lit
SO 0517E 4 R`MIN
ME 41
SOLID 4'PVC WEEP DISCHARGEP (WITH FABRIC 3FT MIK'
S-FOOT CENTER TO CENTER E. FACING AGE)
MTOPOINTSETWEENSOLAI P E J, � --- — INTERIORRELOW GRADE NALL DETAIL (,G) D 3FT MIN, I -j—
FABRIC FLAPi INIG
FOUNDATION > WEEP DISCHARGE PIPE 11
BELOW 4' 00 MIN DUDA PAINE
EXTERIOR WALL DRAIN bETAIt (T�Tl -DRAINED CONDITION > ARCWTECTS
AV'
PVCPIPE
IN
J-L , 4 143,
1� L
YA,
- ----------
TOP OF SLAB ON SPACE
WEEP DISCHARGE PIPE TO BE
00c✓f, c 'HARD PIPE' CONNECTED TO
NEAREST PERPENDICULAR UNDER LS5P
VAPOR BARRIER
SLAB DRAINAGE PIPE
CONNECT WEEP DISCHARGE PIPE
V-1 DRAINAGE FILL
TO DRAINAGE COMPOSITE WITH
■
MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED P" -.0
PAR CAROLINA, MV
FITTING OR COUPLER —YatMe FAx m3mmm
MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS DRAINAGE —,MX0.
IVAN Z4404 FLOOR ACCESS FILL LAYER 0 CHANGES IN SLAB
.011SIN6
CLEANICUTY01ASIET
FOR A" PVC PIPE SELEVA17ON OR 114ICKNESS q g_SOUTHEASTj4,p
COMBO WYE DRAINAGE LAYER STEP 'NAR E, NERTe CAROLINA 201T
Tel T"We, 1s2
FTTTTN6 45DEG C.Sal Rea
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB INTO
c ------- VAPOR BARRIER
DRAINAGE FILL
PERFORATED a o Al o nowomAmaN c c
NON-WOVEN FILTRATION &ECTEXTILE NOTES:
PVC PIPE 4'� MIN A%
1 PRODUCTS SPECIFIED MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH EQUIVALENT PRODUCT, UPON REVIEW giNO
. . . . . . . . . .
NIT
(APPARENT OPENING SIZE OF 70) 2 WEEP HOLES PLACED AT 120, OVERLAP
(A",
TOP OF SLAB ON GRADE REQUIRED WEEPS ORIENTED AND APPROVAL OF ECS -
2. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TO CONTACT LAGGING OR SOIL� NOT THE CONCRETE WALL, SNAL
SEE STRUCTURAL-- AS INDICATED 3 A GEOTEXTILE WRAPPED ADS DRAIN LINE MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED IN LIEU OF DETAIL..
XNSBA
Y7-
NOUT DETAIL(TY�T PERFORATED PI
PE IPE DRAWINGS FOR 4, 4" MINIMUM DIAMETER WEEP HOLES (SOLID PVC UTG BE LOCATED AT 0 FOOT CENTER TO
. ...... INTO DIC) THICKNESS_ VAPOR BARRIER F CENTER (LE, AT MIDPOINT BETWEEN SOLDIER PILES, ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD AS �1�0 01
i- REQUIRED), THESE WEEPS SHOULG BE 'HARD PIPE- CONNECTED TO THE NEAREST
6- DRAINAGE FILL PERPENDICULAR UNDERSLAS DRAIN PIPE,
I, DRAINAGE AND WATERPROOFING COMPOSITE ON EXTERIOR OF BELOW GRADE WALLS TO
6' MIN BE CONTINUOUS AROUND WALLS AND ALL:SIDES OF EXCAVATION,
L (c'& MINIMUM 6 INCH GRAVEL COVER REQUIRED BETWEEN BOTTOM OF SLAB AND TOP OF PVC
DRAIN PIPE, CONN. I ZAIs ALL APPOAREADHED
7. 2 INCHES OF GRAVEL MUST LIE BELOW THE INVERT OF ALL DRAIN PIPES, UNLESS NOTED P WWORELeCTRONICUENNINOSAND
IMIN TYP. PERFORATED WfRel—Ve
OTHERWISE. K ANY FORM W—T WRTTEN PERYMPON
ZORN Z,1404 FLOOR ACCESS HQUSTNr (FROM WA PVC PIPE 8, SENTONITE WATERPROOFING (OR AS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) TO BE OPP A$V.—S 00-
CLEAPPOUT AUGASKET FOR 4'PVC PIPE WALL)
4" OIL MIN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS,
MAINTENANCE OF THE UNDERSLAS DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED, THE BUILDING
ENGINEER WILL NEED TO DERIVE A SCHEDULE OF MAINTENANCE. ECS RECOMMENDS A
(TIP). MINIMUM F MONTHLY INSPECTIONS OF THE SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, COMBO WYE a''-1 UNDEPSLAS DRAIN DETAIL QUARTERLY INSPECTIONS POST -CONSTRUCTION FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS, AND FITTING 45DES '4 CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB (4.0) ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. SHOULD EXCESSIVE ACCUMULATION OF GRIT, IRON OCHRE, OR
VAPOR BARRIER PITS) SON OTHER MATERIALS BE IDENTIFIED, MORE FREQUENT MAINTENANCE:MAY BE REQUIRED,
10, THE PERFORATED PVC DRAINS MUST BE SLOPED MINIMUM CEO TO APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE FILL DRAINAGE COLLECTION POINT,
11WINA'ATED 11, IN CASE OF UTILITY CONFLICTS NOTIFY ENGINEER
PAY IF 12. EGA SHOULD BE RETAINED TO OBSERVE THE GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS DURING THE
END CAP - - EXCAVATION PROCESS SHOULD BE EVALUATED Ti) DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL MEASURES
0 ARE REQUIRED TO HANDLE ANY IRON OCHRE INTRUSION INTO THE UNDERSLAR DRAINAGE
I SYSTEM, SUCH MEASURES MAY INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO REDUCED WEEP HOLE
il�=
SPAC340,ADOUIONALCLEANOUTS, FREQUENT FLUSHING AND CLEANING, ENLARGED
PERFORATED PVC DRAIN LINES, ETC,
13. INTERIOR DRAIN LINE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET I MAY BE SHIFTED UP TO 5 FEET
ILEA OUT DETAIL W/END CAP - PERFORATED PIPE WITHOUT NOTIFYING ECS PERIMETER DRAIN LINES MAY BE SHIFTED UP TO I FOOT
(SO) WITHOUT NOTIFYING ECS. SHIFTING DRAIN LINES IS ONLY ACCEPTABLE IF CONFLICTS WITH
(NTS) OTHER UTILITIES OR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS EXIST, IF SHIFTING DRAIN LINES REQUIRES
ADDITIONAL TURNS, CLEANOUTS SHALT. BE INSTALLED AT THE INTERSECTIONS. PAYS 111=2-
14, GATERSTOPS (IF REQUIRED BASED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS)
SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURSIES RECOMMENDATIONS, NKAW.81� VEA
IS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CLEANOUT LOCATIONS WITH WALLS PER ARCHITECTURAL "ec"D ffy� we t4
PLANS COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEER WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR.
16 SOUDAIPE ONLYTO BE USED AT WEEP LOCATIONS TO CONNECT WEEP TO PERFORATED
UNDERSLAB PIPE,
17. TOTAL ESTIMATED DEWATERING DEMAND BETWEEN 50 GALLONS PER MINUTE AND 100
GALLONS PER MINUTE.
I& T14E SUMP PIT $HALL BE EQUIPPED WITH THREE PUMPS, EACH RATED AT 2a GALLONS PER UNDERSLAB z
A MINUTE IGIPAR, $0 EACH SUMP PIT WILL HAVE A TOTAL PUMPING CAPACITY OF 75 GPM, CONSTRUCTION DEWATESONG FLOWS SHOULD BE OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE 0
DEWATERING TO DETERMINE IF ROME CAPACITY REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY, DETAILS z
19, THERUMPS SALL BE SITUATED SUCH THAT INDIVIDUAL PUMPS ENGAGE AT DIFFERENT
WATER ELEVATIONS IN THE SUIVIR
20, INSTALL GRIT COLLECTION CHAMBER UPSTREAM AND A04ACENT TO SUMP PUMPS
ce
0)
As UD-102Ci
ry
0
0
3 4 — — — — — — — — — — — 6

CONCRETE RETAINING WALL,
�% `g's. • a SEE STRUCTURAL
BITUTHENE OR PROCOR (OR
APPROVED EQUAL.) AT TWO SIDED
' FORMED WALL, PREPRUFE 160 (OR
- '�'�� -'`�`, r a ` • APPROVED EQUAL) AT BLlNDSlDE
®�• FORMED WALL
C " DRAINAGE/PROTECTION BOARD
k.." .
W/ FABRIC FACINGSOE
WEEP DISCHARGE PIPE,=Extendow tf3 mud rust
.�
tl .. cif pii Ia
CONCRETE SLAB, SEE STRUCT I
y CONTINUOUS VAPOR BARRIER,
SEAL TO WALL UNDER REBAR DOWELS
CRUSHED STONE/DRAINAGE FILL
r.
„+.
" R .
Geofabric
�.` Celetl thru wall pipes �.and
,,
�� m ,�� s� din rrlt deter
` d - MUD MAT .wean pi 9 caps
r
: PREPRUFE TAPE
REBAR, SEE STRUCTURAL
^> WATERPROOFING TO MATCH VERTICAL WATERPROOFING
FOUNDATIO ,
Perimeter subdringe pr
pipe, size?
Down from bottom and 90 4"` PVC, ever' t C Existing "' sub i b
gar tO dear hauti met? deWterin pipe
Ow Aft AW
16� X U
/� r TYP Ft NC AT...Amuz
ION AT B2
Y#�3 1 1/2' = 1'-0 A 311

TEMPORARY SHORING PLAN
DIMENSIONAL PLACE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLI N G
CONSTRUCTIONSET DATED 12/12/2016
)OGUMENTSWERE NOT AVAILABLE AT
�N PRFPAR MN. LAYOUT AND ALL Ft s iJ t r ,4 i 7 � 6
THIS PLAN SET SHALL BE REVIEWED min
F"' h o i e. 919 8 7 4, C-),?
C, PRIOR TO START OF SHORING ": 8 4161; t)
OTHERWISE, THIS PLAN SET IS VOID. w}p v - }

NOTES.
1. REF. SHEET NO, C-500 DIMENSION CONTROL PLAN AND C-500
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DATED 10/19/2016, PREPARED BY
COLEJENEST & STONE.
2 REF, SHEET NO, S200 B2 LEVEL FOUNDATION PLAN DATED
10/19/201ti, PREPARED BY BROCKETTE/DANS/DRAKE. INC.
3. THIS PLAN IS REFERENCE ONLY, EXACT SHORING WALL LOCATION
SHALL BE FIELD LOCATED AND CONFIRMED BY. C.C.
SHORING PLAN
SCALE : N.T.S.
TV
ca.
0
aocians
Z
J
d
cr
0
(J)
0
Cl_
a_
L�J
DIMENSIONAL PLACE
qng
CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE, NOR
12/12/2016 CONSWSICT0N SET
a„4hUT
1626.1
D y'.•h°G F?Y
TJJ, JL
TJJ, JL
d At
AS NOTED
203
12/12/2016
2001 r r,n
1

i
a
F'I5 ti
3I:A
rraAz
'tot
i �
x
�4tF. '� "'PE
L'
,.._..._.,......��..:
rTt cY
i .Y.} .
B r; �`At E;1 Sri I .?f fCa
NO re w Pilt
1, AGE
E! .t
/'I')_�SETIO
2 SCALE AI.T.S.
. .
7410
EXIS r r AN. f
r rr � Cc .:.u�+'�
Ci
to p
N i3
U. pF (j 0.
cam-it0-U..
x x
X X X ,yF M X xx x x X%
CL
« r.•« :x . w w X x k X x K ,x :Ix x
t . x x x
«
t x
LJ
.t.
. ..
0
(
,ft 4of )
L
m
5 �
ELEVATION
SCALE : N.T.S.
_' IV, iliEfj.R "UN 111f,
12/12/wo memuom
�r
N.']
/ cE
�.•
T
3 Ntit i3DL suit i'tj f
r'r
., j
1'
Tjj1 JL
SHORINO WALL SYSTEMS SHALL K FIELD
r,. h k .
1'=.i tiY, �Ei 1 6h�rr J
�
3rRAAN 67`r.
START OF WALL CONSTRUCTION.
+�.
"
TA JL
ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED SY SNORING
..—'"'""--'-^
•,C:A�:.
S AS REQUIRED PER OVA, IT SLOPE
(
AS NOTED
SHORING WALL DESIGN ENCINEE"ER PRIOR
E
DET,AIL
IA T,'
} START OF SHORING WALL CONSTRUCTION
72gFFT
2'
SCALE : N.T,S.
NO

t�)
45:AlL SEND L
X
t LEE Pl.EE PLAN t/ay 'LMrk' st'Qpc
NOTE 3�
>. F£
T,55.?" (i.V.) _ ,i Y i 737
0 <' (n} Cr f 0 C : :: L'' < "' , �7 0 o o J 0 o U @ 0 o J t7 a^* e? P U U t% ?2 c as ca 2
I 4 0 t3 4 6 O 0 0 0 b 4 v 0 0 4: +1(T�) 0 C* 0 J n 0 0 0 0 0 v' 0 0 +.'* O �F t�� �) �J 4'T Lx *D'
M _
0 0 G: 0 0 c O 0 u 0 ca 0 o F D a o o o ,0 c, G � � u
® O 04:. tit O Q O O 00 0 0 a 00 0 0 J C O 0 0 v v V v V v
AD
a.
_._.s
+1 0 4� 50 5, c r
A . VA T11,OU 9 qnS
3 SCALE : N.T.S.
_s <
uj
(F V) T mtz < 0
4 G> U i? f? 4 C* C> �*J,] « 90 G t LaY Co Co) Cn` fj o C Gk Ci k .,:
0 0 0 LO 0 cv-j
4<CO t^
�
v v v v v c vt
i.r.I n�^
C-
Gera �rsY, „Co
Of
ELEVATION
SCALE : N.T.S.
52!LLNAIL LEGFgD TCL a TOP OF SHORING WALL � I'
4� 2D GROUTED SOIL NAIL 6 0 S BOTTOM OF SNORING WALL
T O F TOP OF FOOTING
a 27' CROUWD WE, NAIL 0 O F BOTTOM OF FOOITNG
.' * `* v IV GROUTED SOIL NAP F.V. , FIELD VERIFY
a
TEMP, aT.nY"c -Ffx i ftArtt'e' Q W GROUTED SOIL NAIL
{Otte NOTE r, ��si�+.) t „ , ax J6�i rte�
..>S O TEST. NAIL tW. SCHED.} trW1 Uq{dxn . .
12/12/2016 CONS1A91um SET
! .
� cnt NGTEs
,. i vC+' [* i G'i ±i '4T j�Gi U ^w Gt : Gi 9 47 "` L ALL UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED SHORING WALL SYSTEMS SHALL BE FIELD
LOCATED BY THE C.C. BOTH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY PRIOR TO START OF WALL CONSTRUCTION.
j y,=.: 2. ANY UNDER CUT BELOW THE 8.0,5. EL SHOWN ABO`E SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVLD BY SHORING
- WALL DE'GGN ENGINEER.
-•.,, 8.0,5, 0, PS. t: 3. TEMPORARY SLOPE SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE.'D BY OTHERS AS REQUIRED PER OSHA. IF SCOPE
OTHER THAN I-I/El OLV) IS USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY SOURING WAIL DESIGN CNGNNEER PRIOR.
TO START OF S80IONG WALL CONSTRUCTION, RNOTED
4, ALL. DIMENSIONS SHOWN MTN (FLY.) SHALL BE FIELD YER IED PRIOR TO START OF SHARING W.AtL CONSTRUCTION ^^it(29 L. Y . C JL
3 SCALE : N.TS.
12f12/201
l'.THEFT r.rt�
3

NO SURCHARGE ALLONtEP
Mftai ' 2JQ. PSF ALLOWED 2 1 WALER PONE `� 1 �' {hr�At4? y 07'"� _ 86 A2 C W2.9 W.W.F £7
i CZNTERE0 AT NAIL: MEAD- 5 x A WK9 x"W2v W,W.'. r:EINFI
.._._.,.�..-.�...,..-_....„.„.„w .._...�...,._. PLACE 1' OFF NI /ROCK FACE
S91L NAil. WALL SEI.QW IS DESIGNED FOR /" ai x 6 x t fl STEEL PLATE 0 A> �
SLOPE NO EUILEPER THAN 1-1/2 (H) :1 (V) ,rr-P .F'Cr WITH OVERSIZED HOLE x ,rNCI CR7 (MIN) A i._ � (7
(SEE NOTE FOR SHAER RETAIL PON SLOPE)�..�_--.*.: �5 {�tFvt CLAM++'3�`7 �>�. THREADS BAtt LENGD
i-'F' ' Ci ',,t "� VAF , SES ELTVA'gCINS iq
HEX NUT ».�.....-�- �ti ^^k dOE Ii F:it U7" m
i.CLs VARlcS {SCE ELEY.} GAS BEVELrD WASHER /' ��, CEMENT hx €,F2`�J7 " 0 z M'v ,'T `
(AS / NEEDED) > ++ ,� Y+
NAN.) V
t.,. ctt)ER.^�'" SNQTGRFTF 1 NCE WI(., / v ^4.
HAVE, AS SHC F"if�{�'3d1-' �" CEE7`I F?tRtJZEN 0 C:>
ur
....._.,.._.. 7` CHAIR (TYF,),/ hRAM SHAER W lq--v t}C. MAX. (PLACE
IT rROM IV ROW NAIL DOWN TO E,OS, ANF
i .._w.d,.____._....�.... .-. DETAIL
UFO I7 C 7 t{7'hARU CUT S*E - LEAVY;. .•- t0 i #tf
{ b E DETAIL MIN, 7`�_{t Q1t FROM 5401C CfE (°ACED. F � � iti �. il..
1/6',1 {H: V) BATTEREDI t'
RCINFORCC6 SHOTCRETE "." °„ n...,, SCALE : N,T. .
SEE, NAIL WALL FACE--'" {t'sP.) "`� �s
PWAL BBC. 1 •_"' LENOIR SCrii, NAIL (CLEV. : * qha.
WALL Fa.CE,._..-w'"f LhCt'H trnRIE5-SEE GtE.V ..v._. ROEA LE WSI_..,.., .MINI _..:__.
i QRfilEp 9 9+ON!?ED PROBA6LE CYESlCN MINIMUM
I S_E_„.E I. �"`^"� `.x' .. ^�, LEST MAIL LENGTH LENG94 LENGTH 6L'tdOED CAPACITY STEEL
Ci.Lt,S.:k:L, (s€E etty. I PLAN
" {wr.} {FT.) {FT,) 1AI-01 (T1 A—r. Bart slll
N 22 �IS 16 904 0:75 N0. 1
z 2z 2 o sp 015 20.r
{ SECTION{CAMDEN ROAD SIDE)T3 zz z o sat oars NO, Ll -3
T4 2F i2 t0 SC&t U75 NO, 7
SCALE N.T.S. � T5 22 12 10 SM 075 90.7 uj
_ -. _ C3 �C
TG 22 i2 4Q $tNL Q75 N.._0. 7
V 1T 7 10 5{XL 6.75 N4. 7 (.;.
TB 22 12 tO SYNE„NQ.1 '"••✓ „„„).
_...:__..._�. ..�.,_.., w......,,....�..... .............�. ..._...
T4 22 12 itr S'JN. 0:35 Nq.7 "
NO SURCHARGE ALLOWED `.�" �
MAX 50LP5F ALOWEti Tt4 17 7 iG SOIL 0.75 NM 7
j ---- Ttt zx to rtr sou. ars NR. � ��"'to
xlsr rza et (e T vA a I rsz r r a sst Lars N0.
501L NAIL WALL. BELOW 1S DESIGNED FOR / T13 t2 5 7 Sink 9.35 N., 7
SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 1-1/2 (H) , I. (W, /^" ,,.-ELECT •--- "'"`"""`" .�.,. '"...... 9 Q
(,EF NOTE FGit atYaEft DETAIL YAIL Fink sLtWE)_�'-`-"", I. _, F(, "�,,./' 5,..».. TEES i34 12 5 7 $tkC 0,75
�.
Rolm, <
1, PLAN GR,75 ALL-THRF.AtiED STEEL BAR MAY OF, USED FOR TEST BASS
T t15. YAR[FS iSFF CLEV }_.. °' EVST(NG FIBER OPTIC LINES =.:._-I:AS 2 IF DIFFERENT SONNED MATRIAL IS ENCOUNNERED EIi#AHG INSTALLATION OF TEST ui
TO BE RELOCATED PRIOR T7 HAIL, CONTACT :SOIL NAIL WALL DESIGN ENSINVER IMMEDIATELY FOR MODIFICA'TION.
}/ N'y0BRING R I, caNs Ru noN SOIL NAIL TEST SCHEDULE
{BY i:t44F{w'q`ii O ti4iBitf#{dPiiF� ,.
„ 4
?i Lae.
1 f6:1 (H, V) BATTERED.
RFINPOFiC`EQ SH4TGY9ETC ACiWR1CPtaGW '.��' 3,
$OIL NAIL WALL, FACE. I ! Ii�A. tF CE TGI, Nyizf < "� .eyg71'e'
v AST rHF> Ta n AB � � � a
SUPPORTS B) 4.R: pia Y "1 v
v.}„__"",.., a r NOTE
PROP* #3LDG, �,„...) �` � ""'�^ INDEPENDENT OtJt4. tdtatPH#tttiix,
i 1 UiP ETP.A. 1S (h2 Lri MHF1G
WALL FACE—' �' OF WALL__.• =r,. SECTION 4t W ADD A R;Al
z zlaaLe c Nsmuc Nx SET
I91 UENGT D NA8 II. i BATTERED WALL FACE. NOT S E WN
RAdcril VARIES-SEC,.l v.
B.a.S E(SEE lEa
.. r t STCEL HAi2 FOR TEST RAIL
REFFRFNC"F : +,,"' t (SEE SSHFDUIZ FOR SIZE)
PLAT
2 S TI ON {WEST PARK AVENUE SIDE)
DCAS'NO PLAT#. (
a SCALE : N.T.S. w PAN
,thG45 HYDRAULrC / "„rzw
RAM—/ .
Ant;r PSI % i 626.1
POOR CROBINC (IF NEEDED) / p`"U4$0t2UFP C fa F {
AND �Esf RAAE � � styLO, � e OR �
- � DESIOINED
TJJ Jlr
...�..-..D77itt;Gry OPAWN ;3}:.
&NOT ST NAIL DE AIL i ASNOTED
TO SCALE LATE:
„12f12/2016
S'-iET NO.::.
4

Y SNORING WALL
NOS BEEN DESIGNED WITH SOFTWARE UNTIL THREE S3CCE.SSWE READINGS ARE IDENTICAL, EXCEPT AT 3 X:ElTU
_C7PED BY CAL TRANS THESE DESIGN TOOLS AT AH14H A TO MIN GEED TEST FALL 9E PERFORMED NAIL Fi ONCASTON („)
5LQ (SERVICE LOAD DESIGN) PROCEDURES S!#ALI., B MEI SURE.L Wr1 , A DIALGAGE CAPABLE OF MEASURING t; 00 NCH
INCREMENTS AND RECORDED AT: PERIODS IODS OF C. J 1, 2, 3; 5, 6 AND TV MIN, 0 0 '
UAL: FOR DESIGN AND CaNS'RUCTiON :: to ,p
AELEFt A YLiCATIUN OF *f#E `t.ST tUAC? Atvt1. ALSO AT '3U SG SC. AW[i Uti
5". REPORT NO, 7 HdWA-SA-96-069R MIN. DURING CREEP TEST',, IF THE I MIN, TO 10 MHL DISPLACEMENT NT IS � tV
400ADUAL WALL ELEMENTS NOT COVERED IN GREATER THAN OR. EQUAL TO 0.04 INCH
ONED IN ACCORDANCE WHO THE 3, TEST: RESULTS SHALL BE DELIVERED TO SHORING INALL DEVON ENGINEER AT a, CA A
,ONSTRUCNON MARIUS, 03TM EDITION). THE END O6 HE STAY IN WHICH AU" TEST IS PERFORMED THE TEST : OF THE� � c0T+, to p
CRY WERE USED IN 'DESIGNING THE TEMPORARY NAIL SHALL SC CGNSi!)CRED ACCEPTABLE IF MOVEMENT I)' THE NAIL A 5 X
rECHNIGAL REPORT PREPARED BY ECS � 1 , ,*�(StC? � THE DESIGN LOAD IS LESS THAN 0-04 NCNES SETyVF.i1v THE t AND tl C+Mfh {..`J
06-11138-A. DATED 07f22/2016). READINGS ADS LESS 1HAN ONE, INCHED BETWEEN 6 AND AS MIN R£ADUGS..
tP DESIRED), AND THE CREEP RATE IS CONSTANT OR CECIREA DIC
Cf UNACCEPTABLE TEST RESULTS SHALL RESULT IN MODIFICATIONS TO DESIGN m -.0
OR CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES, L+ 0 ui,
9E ii€tp 1. TAD BY THE G.G. $6T44 � .�
f PfdOk TO ANY SH SR 010N. RD OVEN SEEit taAit, "ES f: w' - `cs x: m
I. DRIVEN OIL NAIL TES SAL BE i-R1"ORMED ON A MiN OF 12), NAf;.S IN �: r- C3: CL LL
THE :FIRST LIFE EVERY FIFTY LINEAR FEET (ONE TEST IN THE TOT' ROW, AND
ONE ..:f S`T IN 7t IE BOTTOM ROW) AFTER }Tit FIRST LIFT DRIVEN SITE. NA€.. .
HALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TESTS SHALL RE PERFORMED ON A RI OF () NAIL. EVENT RF Y LINEAR
VIDEO. TEMPORARY SHORING WALL DESIGN Fk:EY: PER UF1', GSTSN $OIL NAIL TFa"`5 SHALL Of PERFORMED BEFORE
ESE. !NOTIFIED OF: ANY DEVIATIONS IRON PRODUCTION DRIVEN ROIL NAILS ARE INSIALLEC ON EACH LIFT. ADDITIONAL
�
DRIVEN SOIL. NAILTERT"S MAY .BE REQUIRED ' BY SHORING WA,ADES'9E3
RE,:CBfAINED FROM SHCEr NO C-SOD GRADING ENGINEER. q
-PARED BY COLF„OtNEST do STONE AND SHEEP 2 ;EST SOIL NAIL SHALL ✓E DRIVEN TO MINIMUM 7 % 0 DESIGN LFNOTH IN
ION PLAN DATkD-TOjiUj2D36, PREPARED BYy IL ROW AS INDICATED ON PLANS UNLESS rFHi.RA nN IRU E. BY
SHARING SMALL DESIGN ENGINEER. AFTER COMP1.19''N OF ID USNEN SOILw. NAIL, ROL GAVE THE TEST NAIL TO FULL LENGTH AND INSTALL HEAD
SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. CONNECTION,
CHES. 3 DRIVEN SO'
6 NAIL TESTS SHALL BE. PULLED UNTIL PULLOUT FAILURE IS ,.,:,.)
3 .INCHES VERY. AND HORIt ACHIEVED iA TES INC C U'PMENT REACHES MAXIMUM TEST LOAD ALLOWED.. - � ._P
'Y TEMPORARY SHORING WALL DESIGN 4. TEST. RESULTS SHALL BE DELIVERED TO SHARING WALL DESIGN ENGINEER 0
FROM T14ESE TOLERANCES PRIOR tO ANN CONFIRMED PRIOR N INSTALLING PRODUCTION DRIVEN DIAL NNLS, Of
<..:.
_j
AND PLATES SHALL CONFORM TO AAA CL �
I
FC BAR SHALL CONFORM TOASTM A6iS MIN. <
ItNIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS 0
;TE IN GENERA4 ACCiTRDANCE WITHWITHACI 5{7iiR-✓'
REINFORCING AND WELDED WRE.. FABRIC As:
\ I IEj
D ,. } P:A3L. CUNNCC7TETN tt'{'3TALlEi>'T.. "` tC US F-
.`ING BAR SHALL CONFORM O AS;M A615 MIN. .r'�``. ",:.,.. ' Rtifi#NG PidBA011S UF'T SCE ''`y ' �>Y L... `
SPAgHG �x �.teTrw e eE aW {TOR) n6 ceFu
CONFORM ID ASTM A145, MLW YIELD STRENGTH' SE' .�
Barr UOf 0
IRIS TO ASE"M CT07, MIN. 2a-DAY COMPRESSIVE � � PREVIOUa
LIFT MESH
�T coaN£c »s T BE { " ; ?Lij
wsTAUED AF ER PReways uET sEE aETA 6 , s E oerAr s
`'` t r- SEE DETAIL A $FLOW (TYR)- ', DN,#ii (iYP j
6 FEET VE"RT!GALLY FAR THE FIRST LIFT AND .L;. M,`^,. T.: ,,� � �,
LO1YtN LIFTS (u.n.N.). ' .„�"" AK �3WA
r �
Pt.AN3 T. T,
x.
ELDER 'MRE FABRIC AS SHOWN IN PLANS. ( DRIVEN 5OYC !.. � i
IN IN PLANS,
PROVIDE M MRS STAGGERED
ZINC PLATE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NAIL (TYP.) € B/W LAPPED MESH V D» DC
7 BOTTOM OF SHORING WALL SHOWN IN PLANS, e ,•
TM
,AVATED SOIL FACE UNSUPPORTED FOR IN
SS APPROVED BY TEMPORARY SHORING WAIL
d7tiN 1#4YYt'^
11 GAUGE MESH .• `;' 11 GAUGE MESH 1Ef12fxpi6 Ct}NC.Te'#(iCTKk#:N7.
6 FEET VERSCAIL,Y FOR THE FIRST LIFT AND r
LOMNO LIFTS (U.j3N). DRIVEN SOIL NAit —,,,., "; `Y DRIVEN SOIL .NAtt —.�
WIRE:' MESH AS SHOW IN PLAN
\ ...,,
XS.SHOWN IN PLANS.
? BOTTOM OE SNORING WAU- SHOWN .N PLANS,PLATE CONNECTION �°_. \` `O�'
;AVATED SOIL FACE UNSUPF'ORTE;D FOR IN : ATOBEINSTALLED
APPROVEDWALL
ER PREVIOUS LIFT.PLATE CONNECTION
.113:5L..GA0TbL `'' , . 1626,1
F PFRF`VAMFiS ON NCIN-PRODUCTUAIL SACRIFICIAL.
tNSTAs.tA ftGN (OR WHEN
FOR MESH OVERLAP)D
OR VERTkOALLtGES 4F MESH. PROVIDE TfE YdtRE 6ETWEEN LAPPED ME$ii 5`-0"
DE
R5;} ON NAILS lND6CATE'D
rNOTE
.C. OR PROVfDE DR}1±ENSOt NAIL PLATE C€1NNECTiON flYER BOTH LAYERS DFESH
I
kRpYtDE:O itSTiNC
AT EA04 DRIVEN SOIL NAIL LOCAT€DN IN THE RERT!C V. SPUCE,
RCNEER 9R HIS REP.
TENSI(kNiNC'. TEST NACt,S TO
p/ yq p DETAIL
A:)MESH
ITG A CAURAFED HYDRAULIC
YC:31tm.Af
05. C25. 05 J.7S. 4.0,:0.2"x,
AOUTEO NAILS, EACH LOAD
Sc L Pl.1'..
1 /
FOR TEN ( t) MINUTES, ;OR
Dv
D16
X

ar Geotechnical * Construction Materials Environmental Facilities
(9th Floor -Archdale Bldg)
Room 942-B
Reference: Engineering Alternative Analysis water I Q 19
NPDES Permit Application No. NC 0089656 So ton
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Denard:
ECS Carolina, LLP (ECS), on behalf of DC Charlotte Plaza LLP, is requesting a NPDES permit
be issued for water generated from dewatering wells which will be used during construction of a
multi -story office building and sub -grade parking garage. During construction of the sub -grade
structure, water generated from the dewatering wells will be collected and treated by a
temporary treatment system. Once the sub -grade structure, including the sub -slab dewatering
system is completed, the collection, treatment, and discharge of water will be shifted to a
permanent treatment system.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The site consists of twelve parcels located between Camden Road, South Tryon Street, and
West Park Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina and is addressed as 1515
South Tryon Street. ECS previously conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ECS
Project No. 08-10875-A, dated August 25, 2015) for the site. ECS identified the following
recognized environmental conditions (RECs) with respect to the subject site.
The presence of a monitoring well associated with the former Clawson Radiator
Brownfields listing located on the site.
The auto repair facilities, potential dry cleaning facilities, chemical laboratories, and photo
finishing facilities identified during the historical information review as being formerly located
on the site.
Multiple facilities identified in the EDR Radius Map Report in the vicinity of the site. Based
on the proximity to the site and/or the direction of groundwater flow inferred from surface
topography, ECS considered the following facilities and/or properties discussed in the
Environmental Records Review section to be RECs of the site- Kee Auto Top
Manufacturing Co. (1538 South Tryon Street), Beaty Bros Service Station (1541 South
Tryon Street), Light Rail (1511 Camden Road), Miller Service, (100 East Park Avenue, H H
Service Station (1600 Camden Road), 1600 Camden Road (1600 Camden Road), Fowler
Building (1447 South Tryon Street), Charlotte Coal Gas Plant No. 2 (South Boulevard),

Engineering Alternative Analysis
NPDES Permit Application
1515 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
ECS Project 49-1836A
December 1, 2016
BCD Development Property, LLC (1611 South Tryon Street), and Delores Sheets
Residence (1612 South Tryon Street).
Several auto repair facilities, filling stations, photo finishing facilities, manufacturers, sheet
metal shops, and other commercial and/or retail businesses identified during the historical
information review as being currently and/or historically located on surrounding properties.
ECS conducted a soil and groundwater assessment (ECS Project No. 08-10875-B dated
September 9, 2015) to assess the identified RECs on the site. Based on the results of the soil
and groundwater assessment, ECS concluded the following:
Groundwater was encountered at an approximate depth of 15 feet below the ground
surface.
Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples B-1 GW, B-2 GW, and S-1 GW detected
targeted analytes at concentrations that exceeded the North Carolina 2L Groundwater
Quality Standards (NC2LGWQS).
If dewatering is required during site development, management of impacted groundwater
will be necessary.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of the construction of a 12-story multi -use building and associated parking
garage. Two levels of the parking garage will be below the existing grade and will be excavated
to an approximate depth of 20 to 30 feet. The base of the garage will extend approximately
seven feet below the water table. Because the bottom of the excavation will extend below the
water table, a groundwater dewatering system will need to be installed prior to excavation and
construction of the subgrade garage.
Initially, a dewatering system consisting of thirty-four recovery wells will be placed around the
excavation. Pumps will be installed in the wells and connected to a 20,000 gallon frac tank.
Water from the frac tank will be pumped to a temporary, trailer -mounted treatment system
consisting of two 2,000-pound activated carbon tanks. The treatment system will also have a
have a bag filter, flow totalizer, and sample port. A schematic of the temporary treatment
system is attached. The treated water will be discharged to the storm drain located on the
northern side of the site along South Tryon Street. The storm drain discharges to an
unidentified tributary to Irwin Creek which is located in the Suga C k Watershed. The
construction stage of the project is estimated as one to two years to complete.
Initially the groundwater removed by the dewatering wells will be treated by the "temporary
system". This will continue until the sub -slab dewatering system is complete. Once complete,
the temporary system will be shut off simultaneous with the permanent system being turned on.
The permanent system will consist of a sub -slab dewater watering drainage system which will
drain into two sumps. Figures showing the sub -slab dewatering system are attached. Pumps in
the sumps will pump water to the permanent treatment system consisting of four 1,000-pound
activated carbon tanks. The treatment system will also have a have a bag filter, flow totalizer,
and sample port. A schematic of the permanent treatment system and piping is attached. The
treated water will be discharged to the storm drain located on the northern side of the site along
2

Engineering Alternative Analysis
NPDES Permit Application
1515 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
ECS Project 49-1836A
December 1, 2016
South Tryon Street. An email from the City of Charlotte approving discharge to their stormwater
system is attached. The final system will be in operation for the life of the building.
Applicant Name
Mr. Jason Frost
DC Charlotte Plaza LLLP
191 Peachtree Street, Suite 500
Atlanta, Georgia / 30303
404-407-1892
Facility Name
Dimensional Place
1515 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Under construction, contact information above
EAA Prepare Information
John M. Stewart
ECS Carolinas, LLP
4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407
336-856-7150.
[e-mail]
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
Evaluation of potential restrictions to a wastewater discharge to surface waters
For streams in western Mecklenburg County, low -flow characteristics published by the USGS
are provided in two reports:
(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water -Supply
Paper 2403, "Low -flow characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993).
An online version of the report is available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2403/report.pdf. The
report provides the low -flow characteristics (based on data through 1988) via regional relations
and at -site values for sites with drainage basins between 1 and 400 square miles and not
considered or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific
Investigations Report 2015-5001, "Low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics for
selected USGS continuous -record stream gaging stations in North Carolina through 2012"
(Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at http://pubs.usos.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The
report provides updated low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics for 266 active (as of
2012 water year) and discontinued stream gages across the state where a minimum
of 10 climatic years discharge records were available for flow analyses.

Engineering Alternative Analysis
NPES Permit Application
1815 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Caroline
ECS Project 49-1835A
December 1 2018
Based on these two reports and the drainage area, the USG S proved the following information.
Drainage area -- 26.4 square miles
Summer and winter 7Q10 - 3.9 cubic feet per second (cfs)
30Q2 flow statistics - 8.6 cfs
W710 low -flow yield is 6.2 cfs,
Qaug unit flow yield is 34 cfs
Irwin Creep is a Mass C waterway located in the Sugar Creek Watershed. Therefore, there are
no restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges.
review of the Catawba River Basinwide Water Quality Plan dated September 2004 and
prepared by Dave Toms with the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water
Quality — Planning does not list any NPD S permitting strategies that limit wastewater
discharges to particular streams within the basin.
Irwin Creek is on the 0(d)';list as an impaired waterway. ay. There is a total maximum daily limit
(TMDL) for fecal coliform of 3.4 x 1012 ful100 mi. Based on the protect description and site
contaminants, it is not anticipated that any focal coliform will be discharged into the storm
sewer.
Endangered species are not present in the proposed discharge location.
Non -Municipal Flow Projections
Based on hydraulic conductivity tuts and dewatering programs, it is estimated the dewatering
systems will generate a flow of up to 75 gallon per minute or 0.108 million + gallons per day
(mg). A similar system ECS is monitoring in downtown Charlotte has an average monthly flow
of 0.0103 mgd. Therefore it is ECS's opinion that once the groundwater system equilibrates,
the estimated flow will drop.
• • • • • -•
e •

Engineering Alternative Analysis
NI Permit Application
1515 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
ECS Project 49-1836A
December 1, 2016
!IizIilillI, III ''I - 'Em 11111 1
M= ARIMIUVIIII n# 11. Ak!iTXU41AMX_--♦
I I
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Local Governmental Form
The Local Govemmental Form was sent via FedEX to both the Charlotte Mayor's and
that they do not have jurisdiction over the project. A copy of the FedEx receipts and
Government form are attached.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLC
k" - to " - - - of M. Stewart, P.G., CPC Brian Smi , P.G.
016�cipal Geologist Environmental Manager
Attachments:
Schematic of Treatment Systems
Sub -Slab Dewatering System, Plumbing, and Discharge Point
Clean Harbors System Components and Costs
5

;000 LB It
TANK"
10?1- " T P.
TOTALIZING
FLOW METER
fG
YlAVe+V V4Yfi.i/4if 4J Ik( FBV: Yd"1p.Y L.
VACUUM LOOP TO FLOW METER
TOTALIZING FLOW METER
. a Rmsom e
NOT TO SCALE
I I
Alta 13LI=t U I SAMPI—t; PUK I ANU
PRESSURE GUAGE P) �°
M.
H+
VACUUM LOOP
BAG FILTER EFFLUENT TO LEAD TANK INLET
LEAD TANK OUTLET TO LAG TANK INLET: Y47 'I
G TANK TO VACUUM LOOP
ETFRED EFFLUENT
i
AMLOGKS
)F 1 TO 100 MICRON
iNFiUENT
AG FILTER BYPASS VALVE

Carbon Vessel 2•&
Vacuum
Breaker

• Dissolve
• Oil and
• Dissolve
• Special
• Catalytic
• Bio-Rmr
0 4MMM
01
emoval (Activated Carbon)
' n
emoval (Sand Filter)
Softener Resin)��
oval ((ranch-Clays)�
ti
)itated Metals Removal
� ti
sin/Carbon Blend)
ilorine and Peroxide Removal)
,ritactor Unit
)ROP GRAPH18"
A s Hatch-30
GAC)
w
Inlet
v
i
P
40 50 60 70
Outlet
ate (GPM)
Tetrasolv filtration
1200 fast 2e Street - Anderson, Indiana 46016 UT &A
Phone [phone] fax [phone] Email. info tetrasoluxcom
Revised Feb 2004

w �. ,._
�..
..
e_ �_� �'�
�
��
k
w

EXTILE
70)
WEEP DISCHARGE PIPE
"HARD PIPE" CONNECT'
NEAREST PERPENDICU
SLAB DRAINAGE PIPE
4" MIN
OVERLAP
TOP OF SLAB ON GRADE
VAPOR BARRIER
DRAINAGE FILL
2 WEEP HOLES PLACED AT 120°
REQUIRED - WEEPS ORIENTED
AS INDICATED

from.
Sent.
To:
Subject:
FYI
[.air
Wednesday November 1 , 20161 :27 AM
1Stewartl
Fwd: Discharging to sewer
aren't things.
age.
irg <E `reebur c ecshmited.cc >
er 1, 2016 at 5:44:54 PM EST
ir'c ecslz ited.co > BS 'ith Smith &ecslin ted.co >
Dischargmg to sever
,BURG PE
14AS, LL.P T: 7+ 4-525-5152 l : 704-31 +-7806 : 714-280-5625 F: 704-
° .ecslimited. om
lssae-----
Lei c.clsalcatte.ncca]
4:30 PM
Erik,
As I told you by phone, discih
sewer is not always allowed. I
answer your questions.
Thanks,
Amy
Sent ftorn my iPhone

rw
Si
T,
G
Sr
A
Zink, Robert <[e-mail]>
Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:17 AM
John A. Core, Chien, Yi-Chen
Colin M. Jenest, Susan G. Freyler
RE: 4432 - Dimensional Place: FW: NPDES Permit for Discharge Water
�nts: image001.png,- image002.png; image003.png; image005,png; image006jpg
is long as you have the permit.
Zink, PE
City of Charlotte I Engineering & Property Management I Land Development Division
600 E, 4th St I Chadotte, NC 28277 1704-336-5385 1 wwwcharlottpnr onvArl
From: John A. Core [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Zink, Robert; Chien, Yi-Chen
Cc: Colin M. Jenest; Susan G. Freyler
Subject: RE: 4432 - Dimensional Place: FW: NPDES Permit for Discharge Water
Robby --
We understand and thank you for the quick response. I was unaware of the 15 day limitation. The geotechnical
engineer asked if I could follow-up.
He also asked if we could confirm via email that it is acceptable to discharge the treated ground water to the storm
system. Do you mind responding to this email to confirm, such that I can send it to him? Thanks!
John A. Core, PE, LEED AP
Project Manager
COLEJENEST & STONE, P.A.
D 704-971-4517 C 919-521-2262
www.ggle"eneststone.com
Land Planning + Landscape Architecture + Civil Engineering + Urban Design
This email is for the recipient pnly. It may contain confidential information. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
From: Zink, Robert [ma ji to.rzink jci.charlOtte .nc.us] 2_
Can+* Tuesday, n k1mamkar ')Q ')AI A 7-43 AKA
Y I iI
To: John A. Core <ic co eneststone.com>; Chien, Yi-Chen < Chien
Cc: Colin M. j_ Jenest <cLenestpcole'eneststone.com>; Susan G. Freyler
Subject: RE: 4432 - Dimensional Place: FW: NPDES Permit for Discharge W
Lci.charlotte.nc.us>
e �er guWene�ststonexom>
ater

We saw the letter or permit someone is supposed to sign. The letter actually called for the City Manager to sign it. We
told the person who brought it to us that no one here would agree to sign the letter until the plans are approved. The
signature was verifying the plans met all City requirements and until the plan is approved, we are not willing to have
anyone sign lit. The permit language also says if it is not signed by sometime around the 1' of December it is
automatically approved, so I'm not sure why they are in a rush to have someone sign it.
Robbey Zink, PE
City of Charlotte I Engineering & Property Management I Land Development Division
600 E. 4th St I Charlotte, NC 28277 704-336-5385 1 www.chariolLenc.Eov Id
From: John A. Core [ma @tJco ore@ oteLeneststone.com]
- --- s -_ _
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 6:25 PM
To: Zink, Robert; Chien, i-Chen
Cc: Colin M. Jenest; Susan G. Freyler
Subject: 4432 - Dimensional Place: FW: NPDES Permit for Discharge Water
Robbey/Emily —
I hope you are doing well. I got an email forwarded to me from the geotechnical engineer on the job referenced above
and he noted that the state is waiting for the City to denote that the project is "properly zoned and that the water can
be discharged to the storm."
I know that we had already discussed discharging the treated ground water to the storm system (which was preferred
over discharging overland or to the sanitary system), but wasn't sure if you needed to send an email to one of the
reviewers at the state regarding the zoning. Are you familiar with this requirement?
John A. Core, PE, LEER AP
Project Manager
COLEJENEST & STONE, P.A.
D 704-971-4517 C 919-521-2262
www,gg!e°etettone.com
Land Planning + Landscape Architecture + Civil Engineering + Urban Design
This email is for the recipient gUl . It may contain confidential information. Unauthorized use is prohibited,
From: MPlotkin [
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 4:01 PM
To: Frost, Jason <
Cc: Bob ac tler <bbachtler holder.com>; JStewartl <JStewartl ecsfirmted.com>
Subject: RE: NPDES
Jason
I know Clean Harbors will haul water. I'm not sure if there are other companies, but I will ask around. John may know of
one. And yes, once it is cleaned it can be disposed of elsewhere, but I am not familiar with all the rules.
2

Once they receive th�confi�rmation �itWffl �goto committee for
approval, and the permit will be written shortly after that. We have tried to tie down the hard committee date, but the
state keeps changing their minds.
Wish we had a better update, but we are simply dealing with the State bureaucracy.
Let nee know if you need anything else.
Marc F. Plotkin, P.E.
Principal Engineer
CCS Carolinas, LLP 1812 Center Park Drive, Suite CO, Charlotte, NC 28217
is 704-5 5- 1 2 t: 704-409-7750 C: 704-451-9794 F: 704- -00 3 www. csiirnite ccrn
Coneord Office 7144 Waddington Road, Suite 180, Concord, NC 28027
C onfflentiallpr era ietary m ssagelattachments Delete rare ssagelettachrrtents if not intended recipiant
From: Frost, Jason mailbaJasonErost cousins ro rties«corn
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:28 PM
To: MPlotkin
Cc: Bob ach l r; JStewartl
Subject: E: NPDES
Marc,
Please let us know as soon as you have any further updates. Do you knew of any firms that haul off treated water?
rt
WENT, DEVELOPMENT I Cousins Properties Incorporated
18921 C:404.488.8864
hive Assistant: l ridgette Wright I P: 404.407.1824 I E: Brid aBeWri t in rtr erties orrr
ree Street, NE, Suite 500 I Atlanta, GA 30303
COUSM0 I Talk to Cousins.
rst, Jason
sd y, November;22, 2016 9:16 AM
Ain <MPlotkin ecstimited«com>
actler<bbacht1erho(der.corn>;1Stewartl <Jteuirartl ecslimted.cm>
e: NPDES
ry disheartening and I just don't understand how this process has gotten so sideways. Never had this much o
We need this to happen quickly.

i nanKS,
Jason F
Sent frc
On Nov
K
PH
EC
T"
Cc
Co
Fr
S(
T(
C4
St
e excuse any spelling errors.
A, MPlotkin <MPlotkin Secstimited corn> wrote:
R we get an update.
Concord, NC 28027
ige,'attachmeots it not intende
n [ma [tojasonFrost@cousinspro 9gr ties.corn
—
ivember 21, 2016 3:29 PM
Hope you had a great weekend. When we spoke last week you felt like we had made
progress with the State and that they were in the last phase which was a public 30 day
review. Could you please provide an update?
Thanks,
Jason Frost
VICE PRESIDENT, DEVELOPMENT I Cousins Properties Incorporated
P: 404.40718921 C: 404.488.8864
Administrative Assistant: Bridgette Wright I P: 404.407.1824 1 E: gn LdaefteWrjqht cousinsLro erne .tern
191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 500 1 Atlanta, GA 30303
<irnage001.png><image002.jpg>
4
�_dq--2o—rn

Werritt
From: Zink, Robert <r ink i. riatt .nc.us>
Sent; Tuesday, November 29, 2016 7.43 AM
To: John A. Core; Chien, Yi-Chen
Cc: Colin M. Jenest, Susan G, Freyler
Subject: RE: 432 - Dimensional Place: : NPDES hermit for Discharge Water
Attachments: image001.png, image002.png, image003.png; i age005,png imageOO7 jpg
We saw the letter or permit someone is supposed to sign. The letter actually called for the City Manager to sign it. We
told the person who brought it to us that no one here would agree to sign the letter until the Mans are approved. The
signature was verifying the plans met all City requirements and until the plan is approved, we are not willing to have
anyone sign it. The permit language also says if it is not signed by sometime around the Vt of December it i
automatically approved, so I'm not sure;' why they are in a rush to have someone sign it
Robbey Zink, PE
City of Charlotte I Engineering & Property Management I Land Development Division
600 E. 4th St I Charlotte, NC 2 277 1704-336- 365 I wwwtcharlottenc. o Id
From: John A. Core [mailto:jcor @colejeneststone.comj
Sent. Monday, November 28, 2016 6:25 PM
To: Zink, Robert{ Chien, -Chen
Cc: Colin M. Jenest Susan G. Freyler
Subject: 4432 - Dimensional Place. : NPD6S Permit for Discharge Water
abbey/Emily --
I hope you are doing well, I ,got an email forwarded to me from the geotechnical engineer on the job referenced above
and he noted that the state is waiting for the City to denote that the project is "properly zoned and that the water can
be discharged to the storm."
I know that we had already discussed discharging the treated ground water to the storm system (which was preferred
over discharging overland or to the sanitary system), but wasn't sure if you needed to send an email to one of the
reviewers at the state regarding the zoning. Are you familiar with this requirement?
John A. Core, PE, LED AP
Project Manager
COL.I. JENEST & STONE, P.A.
D 704-971 a9 C 919-62 -2 62
www.gqLejeneststone.cont
Land Planning Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Desigtt
y
This email is for the recipient 2V& It may contain confidential information, Unauthorized use is prohibited,
1

From:
Sent: I
To: Fr(
CC: BO
state keeps changing their minds.
Wish we had a better update, but we are simply dealing with the State bureaucracy.
Lei
ECS Carofin,
T: 704-525-E
Concord Off
C{?nfidentiall)n
From: Fro
qo.nt! Mnr
..— -- 1--
gallons a day
Thanks,
Jason Frost
else.
give, Suite D, Charlotte, NC 28217
-451-9794 F: 704-357-0023 www,ecslirTiite.d.com
Suite 180, Concord, NC 28027
)edel& n7essageA,'itlachrnents if not interVed recipient
nAllto qnFr ��tnro�i . gom
nber 28, 2016 3:28 PM
�wartl
ip quickly.
PMENT I Cousins Properties Incorporated
Administrative Assistant: Bridgette Wright I P: 404.407.1824 1 F.
191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 500 1 Atlanta, GA 30303
2

46COUSiffi I Talk to Cousins. I M
From: Frost, Jason
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:16 AM
To: MPlotkin <h4Rfgtkinfflecsrtmited-com>
Cc: Bob Bachtler <bbacht @ ter !Iolder.com>; JStewartl <12ewartI@_ecslimited.com>
Subject: Re: NPDES
That is very disheartening and I just don't understand how this process has gotten so sideways. Never had this much of
an issue. We need this to happen quickly.
Thanks,
Jason Frost
Sent from my !Phone. Please excuse any spelling errors.
On Nov 22, 2016, at 8:14 AM, MPlotkin <MPloIKinjr2&Iecslimitedcom> wrote:
Jason,
We thought we had made progress; however the state did not issue the permit last week and they are
indicating it will not be issuea for public notice until mia-December tmat wouto push oewatertng
discharge back to mid to late January). We are seeing what can be'done to accelerate this or trying to
get hard confirmation from NCDEQ that the dates won't slide again.
I will touch base as soon as we get an update.
Best Regards,
Marc F. Plotkin, P.E.
Principal Engineer
ECS Carolinas, LLP 1812 Center Park Drive, Suite D, Charlotte, NC 28217
T: 704-525-5152 D: 704-409-7750 C: 704-451-9794 F: 704-357-0023 www.ecsfirnited.corn
Concord Office 7144 Weddington Road, Suite 180, Concord, NC 28027
Confidentialzoroprietary mossage,'attachments. Delele messagelaftachments ff not intelded recipient
From: Frost, Jason [mailto.*JasonFrost@cousins ro rties.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 3:29 PM
To, MPlotkin
Cc: Bob Bachtler
Subject: NPDES
Marc,
Hope you had a great weekend. When we spoke last week you felt like we had made
progress with the State and that they were in the last phase which was a public 30 day
review. Could you please provide an update?
3

I
001.png><image002.jpg>

Clean Harbors -- Remediation, Technologies
3300 -131 North
P.O. Box 968
Kalkaska, MI49646-096
231.258.8014 office
231.258.6993 fax
www.cleanharbors.com
"IA ELECTRONIC MAIL
November 15, 2016
Bobby Kinsey
Holder Construction Group, L,L C
615 South College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Re. Dimensional Place Dewateiring
Dear Mr. Kinsey.
Thank you for inviting us to submit a proposal for water treatment services for under -slab drainage during and after
construction of the "Dimensional Place".. Clem Harbors is regularly engaged in providing, operating, and
maintaining systems to treat contaminated groundwater and keep water discharged to sanitary sewers within
NDPES and local permit limitations.
The project includes ` o phases, The first phase will be the rental of water treatment equipment to treat water
produced in dewatering operations during 'construction. The second phase will be the sale and installation of a
permanent treatment system to treat groundwater produced by the under -slab drainage system indefinitely.
Analytical shows the water to be contaminated with low levels of the following compounds:
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
s 1,1-Dichloroethylene
+ 1,2-Llicloroethane
+ Chloroform
• Tetrachlor thylene
® Trichloroethylene
Clean Harbors' approach in bath phases will be to use a combination of textile and media filters to remove e berth
suspended solids and dissolved organics from the groundwater.
1. System Description
Equipment rental will consist of trailer -mounted, mobile equipment capable of treating water at a flow rate of 25
gallons per minute (gpm). Equipment will be provided with a ;preliminary supply of filter (nags and the initial load
of media. Clean Harbors staff will deliver the equipment to the site, make connections to contractor -supplied sump
pumps, test operation, and instruct Holder staff on monitoring and bag filter change -outs. The cast for this phase
includes the provision of O&M manual and field staff training. The equipment will include, at a minimum:
PT -80 Mobile Treatment Unit with multi -bag filter housing, lead and lag 2,000## Carbon vessels
"People l and Technology Creating a Better Environment it "

Lis
Pricin
w1:
* 4
involverevised syste
• Submersible pumps i!
system to the outfall
• The suspended solids
oil -water separator (I
system. 1fTSS is hi
• Clean Harbors will n
system.'
• The general contracts
• Discharge permits, sa
• The treatment system
operation, they can b
• Charges for media di
ivated Carbon for contaminant removal and initial suppler of 100 filter bags
(LS) $6,56
top (LS) $ ,3Ci(
1(MO) $2,134 O x 6 MO $1 ,$Ct!
1 Bag Filters) $6,1 (
spent media.
lean Harbors (shipping included) for $.0/ea.
hat the material is profiled as non -hazardous.
chnology Creating Better Environment"

All work will be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined by a Master Service Agreement
between Glean Harbors and Holder Construction Group, LLC.
Clean Harbors: will begin mobilization of equipment and crews once a Purchase Order is issued. Thank you for the
opportunity to provide this proposal. Please call David Grote at 231) 3 7-9033 if you have any questions or would
like to discuss the proposal further:
Sincerely;
David R. Grote, P
Field Project Manager
cc'
Mike Leahy, Clean Harbors
Tony Fisher, Clean Harbors
"People and Technology Creating a Better Environment>,

From. [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 201610.40 AM
To: AMrritt
Subject: FedEx Shipment 777734988618 Delivered
TaretTt project
34988618
Shipment Facts
Our records indicate that the following package has been ;delivered,
Tracking number.
77773498861
Status:
delivered: 11118/2016 10:38
AM Signed for By; P.PRICE
Reference.
49-18 6A Govt Review
Signed for by:
P.PRI E
Delivery location.
CHARLOTTE,NC
Delivered to:
Receptionist/F€ont desk
Service type:
FedEx Priority Overnight
Packaging type,
FedEx'Pak
Number of pieces:
1
Weight:
1,00 lb.
Special handling/Services:
deliver Weekday
Associated return tracking
790586958990
number( ):
t

Standard transit; 11118/2016 by 10:30 am
--

AhAturriff
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, November 18,2016 10:42 AM
To: AMerritt
Subject: FedEx Shipment 777735035877 Delivered
TargetType. project
Delivery date,
Fri, 11/18/2016 10:39
am
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
us
Shipment Facts
Our records indicate that the following package has been delivered.
Tracking number:
777735035877
Status:
Delivered: 11/18/20,16 1U9
AM Signed for By:
S.CHERRY
Reference:
49-1836-A Govt Review Form
Signed for by:
S.CHERRY
Delivery location:
CHARLaTTE, NC
Delivered to:
Receptionist'Front Desk
Service type:
FedEx Priority Overnight
Packaging type:
FedEx Pak
Number of pieces:
I
Weight:
1.00 1b,
Special handling/Services:
Deliver Weekday
Associated return tracking
790586961047

urn rt .
t nd rd transit: 11/18/2016 by 10.30 am
2

Attachment A. Local Govern
NoNarne of local gqvenuncnrA&6.jAu.
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the I
located? Yes No K If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and re
Does the */county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes t
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the propoi
No[
Date (0 Signature
State of 0 County cif
thl"t
_day of P,
net hto mckno
and who exevuted the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that I
by me, made oath that the statenients ist flit foregLing document are true,
My Conamission exp.
,1—5(Signaturc of Notary Pubb
re4 4ti
t Review Form
wq innnt frnm Itiral amremtnentv in th.- imv2nri-
EAA Guidance Document Revision., April 2014
Rage 1 of 8 % ;01

j DUDAIPAINE
ARCHITECTS

cousaNs
*Cousins
ONEMIONAL
PLACE
„ +
DUCA PAINS
,r
ARCHITECTS
a 4 v
tX +yr a
a Y* •✓ a.. ♦ is \, _
r M-
X �
E
r.
a
v
r
X
L 5p
X
X i
4
a r
v * '
1 a * v
IZ
UNDERMAS
W 0
[e-mail]#SLM^E pRAWR6EtS hmerr
6E
LAYOUT
ERS NA6E kAY - - - - - - v eMlla
M&l PHbILASEfiE TEtk'kR4C4#i
FkDOTWG AND FOUNDA N

ctsu s ""
8 }TE WA XNB{OR Ak SthSWN ---------------
"- WA AN 4t"s [YS+JkbIA e WAU:r'41%.#.Ya2NY M5Yu BENTdJSTE WAF, iF A$SHOW9% ~ ,. f"! °n
pNYHE R#,'Nd'9[MNRA4 t1RAN"YNkR} t%d YAV#ii. A6dM : A aRPEPtlEGhW,Wd4T&IKM1.yPR6 tl6A `5 ONTW0.. YiCYF`TtpYAt GNA s) },,.
4,FE SCA# ._..
%h&NSCt"lAP Cp:5Y1@NaNAtiBTCC }
tdctlxNGapnutz,.TMi � auxeuQ�aa¢sE gro ezrta.m PkOMATYB[NYtAUME' `x ' •" '. �n��Efl�� ?}. C1NAiNSit)NAi
PLACC
. 813.GwrTwsx6fxnaE Fat Rsov<9ampNfew eerbeieaa9 a
` r u �. FEtYTpC{A.C[Sµi1ElRtF!
' r a..cYNu3tRk �"` WAid .�_,,,. #.GMFCS9ATE-t*MLwE;#4La N4iP ARAINASk PPRf {5CkY9?
# h 1 taE
aYCPt$E "
�1 �4;M
..k�*v*rmrvpi �„ NMUkA,sp&CER �N CENn^3kAV(AJ 4EQUiAfRi1 }iqr.i fAAWAdhb PSLLAA
_P 5`T dQAYNASE WA:I U'AQCM"2PK^MAfkta.5C1LMFkx
r $� 4 QwlTNAGF PqL . ,
Acx.xdA vvcwcto L+xsad,�wrxttae �{. ,..; ., �.,"' s�..ifa= ctweosx� } �
b.POpTCENtF�iPiE1a1ER {I,E AY � FAtiN53CM`j V � "; ) 1
ecwarrzeax tlsex+ raam«.axevz esc%sr ..: `., v<; ' IN'1'ER2iPR Af4qW "R bE WALL ;s TAIL
ena.rtetaa ....eww.xxttxLFt u'tEv rr:sewna&a:eme a*ax DUDAggPAINE
8i4ow r' n' nC tnw
EXTERTIORWALLDRAM CTAX WPICAQ - DRAZNEb COMMON #s.a) ' . L �=^�'->-- µ --- ` `' --�,�- � ARCHITECTS
GYw,lol &d➢m OE }. .�:,
'x aorxrE"ascrca TO ".�T, w
x �.. ,=F RERaE+,raFo-rnA..0 wrx },.�`ul F ,...vAeatlaAwuxEa
Gr WEEF OiSGSUfi6E wtaE `� ., ` 9AA9 M:AlNA6&.DiPE "��', '}e�� '^,'�
FaaRAtraAfE<mAwarstxc'wrn+ w _ ;�'#w�t' �.a ys} „a"t}.'cudn sari - •
' � „ ., MAiNYA4NCNi seas=wxwaawsme
zlI zl-FL AGMs FSt44AT."A6GNM E5YN 5LRtl
.-- ruwsM6aEiFe IWIaASx l n9varzxmsm"cowss GCB CARQ NAS LiP
wrxexrea R+Man:
rbwanwvE a .,..-.. , .._ ORAitdA6E LAYER bETAi(. TYP
rrYTtr+s asu%
v.mo.aRceFa
c.
.:
:axxNASEma.
Y'fV _ 4 wv=*'i¢r�,F,.,c-v^°fi h ` NSYiwo+ENi%LmdSi0tn 6Etl4E%aaae a�TN �Aat.,.
w�, . .. e .. tAA#FMYCR(:MWGStSE bFrtrt
aVEfA.Rp f
�, YAPflF tl4.A6 tlN 6LAOE 2 WrN4 PKffiESY.Rc'LR RT 1xY . PRPWC`165PEGk�tlFdAY dE NitF,SR1fl1TEli t4gYM Erzurrv.Ear PRpbi/GT. ttMN3 REM1A£`N
.. NEQUtREkWEEPs dUCNYED Y"` 'w°t RND##wRifl+N.4w EGE.
SRu
CLEANWTDETAX(TreWrrA4)EE5XCYw-,AS WUYGAYF,U ., r"
« '! at... A+nlc-"e.0NSRZaRT:#Xsxia&aEuFEu9sa.t+meEnrRrr»F.twnr.+wm1a'rt+rie1XwelMsNTtUd#GCMTte�4ArAtaw%vt+NGqMa RrtoOR sSLLGcF�ssrs.RmNTCE?vYurYneHFaEaaC+wQcLaNrtrN;FccEuetNFoT. WEerRAnirnIa.rw+zcNxEsa„ �, uA+oa BARtZEk' _vRns.ar ,v+�EErwscaaEN #asa ,matsr>er+re+vrs FtEtbas
e. 1 �wi "'' -'-- F } ....�.. N�Si+kS£Yd@%P5stuxa.tteEwNasM^c�FEofo saawnR¢tlr
1 PESN*EPCNU^ucRR TERPRDOkNGr
: s. g11AW#dERNtiOtit�WUtAkR`6:#tY5 tFNExxF%dpRp^sin4owtiRnnF wmxro wa.
wffiWUM awues MVeL wr.LLsnr W a5!FMMNSOTM dN
4�L' ,e, � tl aNarr�as�ttr�.#vEL RneavraF.erdw�ENezxrn�ac+F+unerttm aF we
}'NINTH `'"' AYEU 4• y ?4 $, $ 9GF'OfiRbEf.MU9T kF @E£aV+"Ti4E RYt}F Rio W#+ES UWcSstmiiiT �AkeN eee
F:YtN Z=tAiMY4IN1k Au%Es3+&i4aSTNs #Tv4bAt N'sU t7 N&FSFE a tr�uxva xAgA
.:.., dPAtut}4tR WIpX.GSFt M,pR�kYGpSPE Yt'AUN a°flD MbV -'' ^4��� A4�� & A$N NA. ri ({7RR5 OMrfiE MCMMMftFSHkA'tYW#titl}TC4 &C
�; ersT#ttl�.m Ea wttw # asac +m#rrcxNs,
h �. `s l< � �""�+ a aBRktrxYiRrlcE Darns uNr�Erts[..aRbRawmaF&'YSYEM WR4sffREgtaREo,r+aE.cANc+
Cb.o NNE
VP4CtER5LA6 pRAiN iEiAiL,(TYPj : eaw rev GFlUNStFra}E srsvttw a mra,
CimuR&Wf 6dOaA s`cAe (s p,.. '-.. ;.,. aF YPEG, paRY.C4k&T Et#YAkFARMgW TwO YEA&6 'R ;
rn, � �;...,',.b VNkNt9ApRPE'A i,M{i.Ff a`ktN-. OYCiER &t0.9E R,� Ek6iN!¢NT YKYN C9F b0.A0.Y 6E ft#
i., �(.4ft+.MAfiEFkYt i0. #+ER �rEb Pt+a � MtisY d9E SF UM 6.lY�tkA tMNiAiE
v} ""• efORA4'fD 11. N#2:REE iSE UTR.fYYC..moTo Ni2TiFY-B.N%kN6Lk,
",. fVt PVF t2. EC.R b6P RETNMAiD Tf%... EinE C'Fi. A'tERG S YNE
EN6 CRP y y "CAVAMN PRMSS b K EYF.LMMD TO MTV W Es.
mle walmoY komE,#M"IRCNt t1C: kJT 16 DTHE 5leawEa
.... . Sl+'6'FFN. sUCN P 3aMV XNtS, : aurARsar rD Ci . Nt%E
.. $a.?Rx:x +ENe FL.ust ArmMAWED
PCro TfDPVCARRNkkNJEfi, ETC,
CLEAtJCFUT 6ETAi1. WIETtD CAP - PERFC3RATED PIPE C5o7 d:L W"HOUTN"Y#*W$, PVR**Twasaaaa swEEv r ennrae Tfi0 P TO l M 1
.. .. WttHpt)TNCtYIFY�a3EC5. PEftYFAETEttW1MNUNE94drlY Eb UP `4`crt F4aY
WFTiPUS Nff EC9. SNV^ t#tRiN ANN:5INikR.W ACt;E:GTdkt.E lF YCT$riTFtt
warc} CkYkn"Jd S�.TRVG ETE t+J EkST. LA SWVfplli LlpkE4 t4E 6 eAoxm veq.rtnwe
AD M4W
iR.: VtATNRS i�NE. Q [rN:fME ANlC6MtEG SYRANi bNR f o»awwsrt� wA
.. S4Vd48E. #i4YN.l6Ys: ErERRMNUF .:.... `ffi 6l#.0 ...mew
'!8. �. tLYRTtt YE GL LdCRIkMtS N1MbVRlt4 PEfl
RI AN9, R5'E:pMNTdN}.E k CQNYtCrSGGCUR.
t& Sti4k?wk+EbFA,YrtY@Ekd'3Et1#tWEFi+.14YC#flpNS TO CdNNEGT WEEwitl +EAFCWRtEb
UFWER&ABHwEUNDFRUAS
:
RY. YQTRIffi4 YE0 R ! EEk&liiAttiXtSD@R #V[l N'k}-
tt. ME. MT SniLI:11E. YRYN C E. EACH RRTEPRT%9 t?RC.4(YM4MER
R. nsc suRtawrwn.ewavEarbTse c#w ors cxnc. AGE
ccwvsraucxtaNn� #r ci.crwa, aec srcM+cb tN cvuasra: rue M
tX',WRYEitINk'tY 1
k9d. THE e}tt l FTAYEeaBuUaOTAY 1 NdA"ENGRWAT kYEEN
MEYdT NFEMLPbCMN 0"MkkftTftla
RPN! ,PNTTt5 Nt1AiP..:
UD-10

N