NC0021971_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

A � t Laserfiche
V1\/"a1H'11()--Z'
so
Blanchard Terminal Company LLc
A wboxilarfo# Mwathon ftftkumCo
August 13, 2019 539 south Main Street
Findlay, OM 45840
Tel; 419.422.2129
Wastewater Branch
Water Quality Permitting Section
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 269-161
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
Charlotte East Terminal — NPDES permit NCO021971
Selma Terminal, outfall 001— NPDES Permit NC0088960
Selma Terminal, outfall 00 — NPDES Permit NCO036145
To Whom It May Concern:
By notice of this letter, I hereby designate signatory authority to the following individual for all permit
applications, discharge monitoring reports, and ether information pertaining to the operations at the subject
facilities as required by all applicable federal, state, and local environmental agencies specifically with the
requirements for signatory authority specified in 15A NCAC 2B.0506.
Name. Laurie Wilkins
Title: President, Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
Mailing Address: 539 South Main Street, Room K-t 6-016
Findlay, OH 45840
Email Address. [e-mail]
Office Phone. [phone]
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact Erin Risner via email at
errisner marathon e roleurd.corn or via phone at 419-421-2019.
icer ly;
Angela Bro ,Vice President
Blanchard erminal Company LLC
539 South Main Street, Roo K-06-013
Findlay, OH 45840
asbrownmarhonoetroleum.corn
419-421-2629
CC: Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resource
Raleigh Regional Office y'
628 Mail Service Center 6"Eanter ve, 1
Raleigh, NC 2 99-1628 Mooresville, NC 2811
e11MRadmin ncadenr. ov michele.scott ncdenr. ov

Sub itter Change Request Form — (4ddlupc ate users)
r,7
North Carolina Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report System.
EDMR registered Owners may use this form to add or update eDMR users to the NCDWR's Electronic
Discharge Monitoring Report system. if the Organization is not currently registered for eDMR, then the
Owner or designated Responsible Official will need to complete the required eDMR Registration Form
(available from the eDMR webte) and submit it to the NCDWR eDMR Administrator at the address
below.
Type of Request (please select):
Add Submitter Permissions: (See Section B)
Update Submitter`Permissions: (See Section B)
To add or update eDMR user permissions, please provide the following information.
Section A: Owner Information
WHOM 10:81,11111#111AIMU
i
! ! !«
v r� e r r � " � • 1. ► i"
a IN
IN
..:
i
asbro
�I
•..}., ! l... :1... ... ':.•e:. ! 1. �` ! . l... ! + ! ..! ,,
NCDWR eDMR Submftter Change Request Form -- ver.1.0 Page

Y
NCUU21971 NC0088960 INCO036145
Laurie
same
Wilkins
1' e1 �tber#
(419) 4 9-5367
,Cyy
lageorge
@xnarathonpetroleum.com
ssienedbvNCDWReDMRAdndnistrator
Sei ct eqc st.
Add User Permission
f 13 2019
❑ Update User Permission►
AddlU date User Permsson as cif Date}..
Pone 1�lumber:
UMf\✓JII. " #
tssa ned by N DFYR eDMR Adodnistrater
Select Renxest
© Add User Permission
0 Update User Permission
Ad ate User Permission as of Lute
Submitter User Details
e .*YkTs
User ID:
Asri ned by N'CDWR eDMR Adj��
Se eet' qtnest
© Add User Permission
Type:
0 Update User Permission
I AddX date User Permission as c ate
NCDWR eDMR Submitter Change Request Form - ver. 1.0
Page

Responsible Official Authorization
The Responsible Official, as identified in accordance with 40 CFR 122.22 is the appropriate individual
with the authority to sign: reports for the organization.
I, Angela Brown (printed name), have the authority to make this request for
Blanchard Termi mvanv LLC (OwnerlOrganization Name).
I request the NCDAR add or update the eUR Subrnitter user permission(s) as indicated above on the
Submitter User Details page.
1-0 Vice President ?
O nerllt onsible Official Signature Title Date
Please return the completed form to the N DWR eDMR Administrator via:
Fax: or E-mail: or Mail to:
[phone] eDMRadmin ncdennggy Information Processing Unit
eDMR Registration
1617 Mail Service Center
:Raleigh, NC 7699-1 17
tNCDWR eD R Suhtmtter Change Request Form - ver.1.{? Page

ROy COOPER,
ICHAEL S. REGA
t.
S. JAY ZtMMEkMAN
October 2, 2017
Terry Swick, Terminal Manager
Blanchard Terminal Company l_LC
7401 Old Mt. Molly Road
Charlotte, NC 28214
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Tracking Number: NOC-2017-LV-0092
Permit No. NCO021971
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Swick.
A review of the June 2017 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the deficiency(s)
indicated below:
Limit Exceedano Rokignadfi)i
Sample Limit Reported
Location parameter Date Value Value Type of Deficiency
010 Effluent Chlorine, Total Residual 6/5/2017 17 50 gaily Maximum Exceeded
(50060)
Please be aware that non-compliance with your permit could result in enforcement action by the Division of
Water Resources for these and any additional violations of State law. The Mooresville Regional Office
encourages you to take all necessary actions to bring your facility into compliance. if you should need any:
assistance or would like to discuss this non-compliance situation, please contact Wes Bell of the Mooresville
Regional Office at 704-663-1699.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resorces,'NCDEQ
Cc: WS Mooresville Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Compliance/Enforcement Unit - Enforcement File
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality l Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
704-663-169

:ya ROY COOPER
Governor
MICI-AEL S. REGAN
Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMME N
Environmental Quality Director
September 26, 2017
Mr. Terry Swick, Terminal Manager
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
7401 Old Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Charlotte 'Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO 121971
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Swick
n September 14, 2017, Mr. Chad Broadway of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
The inspection report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes Bell of this Office at (704) -2192and/or
Broadway at [phone], or at w s. ell ,ncdenr: ov and chadbroadwavamecklenburLcoimbmcZov,
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality ;Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
MSC-1 6 17 Central -Basement
WB
State of North Carolina I Environmental Qualityl Water Resources I Water Quality Regional operations
Mooresville Regional office 1 610 East Center Avenue; Suite 310 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-16 9

I
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approv
ed.
EPA Washington, D.0 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section N. National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type inspector Fac Type
1 �j 2 Ej 3 NCO021971 (11 12 17/09114 117 16 1 ^ l 19 0LJ
F L"( Lfi
21
Inspection Work Crays Facility S tF-Monitomig Evaluation Rating B1 QA,,
6712.0 ..� 1 70 Ej 71 E 72 L. Nj 7 - 74 71t 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POT , also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPOES permit Number) 08:OOAM 17/09/14 1 /07/01
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
7401 Old Mount dolly Rd
Charlotte NC 28214 1 O:OOAM 17/09114 20/06130
Na ets) of Onsite Representative(s)1Tiiles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
11l '
Terry Lee `cki/704-392-1345 f
Name, Address of Responsible lfficialfritle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Angela S Brown,539 S Main St Findlay OH 458401/419-422-21211
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated Daring Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
permit ® Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Mudge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary
Name(s) and Signatures) of Ins rle) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Water Quality Program Meckenburg County MRO I704-36-5449t
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/ oe/Phone and Fax Numbers (Tate
W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-23 -21 41
EPA Form 360-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
ar ,
Page#

�r
Permit: NCO021971 c ner. I~acilitys Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
inspection hate: 0911412017 Inspection Types compliance Evaluation
Perms
Ygs
Mg NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
11000
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
(�
## Are there any ispecial conditions for the permit?
©
©
S
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ -
o
011
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
all
110
Comment: The facili 's current oermit became effective on 7/1/2015 and ex` ires can 6/30/2020, The
last ins action of this facifily was conducted by the 'M klenbur Counly
Water Quality
Program on 8//201 a:
The facili is as described in the permit, with bermed secondary containment dikes for the
bulk li ud story e area apoint-source dinar a valve that remains locKqd when neat in use
and a retention pond, The facility also has an oil -water se arator that treats contact water
from the loading' rack: all flow from the oil -water se` aratoris removed by
an outside
contractor.
Record Keeping
Yes No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
M
Q
Q
Q
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
0011
Are all records maintained for 3 years (tab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
®
110
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
p
p
p
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■"
p
p
11
Crates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Crates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
p
p
Q
Has the facility ;submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ1
11
®
No
,
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
©
13
M
0
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the t RC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
©
©
■
Q
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
©
0
■
11
Is a copy of the current NPDE6 permit available on site?
■
Q
C]
Page#

Permit: NCO021971 Owner - Faclllty* Chadotte Terminal (outfall
009)
Inspection Date: 09/1412017 Inspection Type: - Compliance Evaluation
0—ma—b—ons —& MaUteLiinge
j(21 L49 NA Ng
Comment: The faclljjy visually ins!2991—s the oil -water separator on a daily basis. All go-nt.@Lt water
treated by the!2:tl:Aater separator drains to two 1 0.000-gallon tanks and is removed by,
Heritaoe-Ctvstal Clean or Allied Eng[gy on an aL-ntedqd, basis,
At the tirrig of in§gftction, the facility grounds were gt§erved to be well-keDt and in
ggod
ggedition.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Ya Ng
LA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
9
El
El
11
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
a
0
0
11
Is the flow meter operational?
ME]
El
11
(if units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter
D
D
M
El
Comment: The facility measures flow with WSparling in -ling Row meters at each of the two ouffalls.
Both meters were calibrated by Sr)arling Instruments on 10/2§/16. Documentation for
gguipmen* calibration was maintain in the loa book.
Effluent Pie
Yes no NA NE
Is right of way to the ouffall properly maintained?
8
D
11
11
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
0
D
0
13
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating property?
11
0
9
0
Comment: The facility has two ou Lfall% The facility was not digghslming at the time of ingpection.
Receiving waters were gtperygij to be free of foam or other pollution indicators:
Page#

Bell, Wes
From: Jarabeck, Bob (MPC)<[e-mail]>
Sent: i Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Bell, Wes
Cc: Risner, Erin E. (MPC); Eickholt, Andrew T. (MPC)
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Contact information
Attachments: Charlotte -West NPIDES Permit NCO04621.3 Permit Name -Ownership Change Form ..,.pdf
Wes,
Tim Aydt was replaced by Don McCord; see below;
Donald K. McCord
Charlotte East (NCO021971) Blanchard Terminal Company LLC -President
Charlotte West (NCO04621 ) MPLX Terminals LLC - President
Angela S. Brown
Charlotte East (NCO021971) Blanchard Terminal Company LLC — Vice President
Charlotte West (`NCO046213) MPLX Terminals LLC - Vice President
MPC submitted a transferletter (name change from MPC LLC to MPLX Terminals LLC) for Charlotte West and it is
attached. Angela gown will be the main R© for both terminals. However, if we are allowed to have two RO's, we would
like for Don to be listed also.
I hope his clears things up. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
From: Bell, Wes [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8.49 AM
To: Jarabeck, Bob (MPC)< rjjara beck@ marathon petroleum. com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Contact information
Good Morning Bob,
Is Timothy Aydt the President for Blanchard Terminal Company LLC and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Marathon
Petroleum Company, LP?
What is Angela Brown's title. I am completing the NPDES inspections for both facilities (performed by Mecklenburg Co.
Water Quality Program) and am confirming the Responsible Official contact information (including address, title, phone
number, etc.).
Thanks for your assistance in this matter.
Wes
Wes Bell - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environmental; Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.235 2192 Fax: 704.6 3,6040

L
D. xA40 Iw VAX VA It
July 18, 2016
Timothy J Aydt
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 S Main St
Findlay, OH 450
SUBJECT. NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Tracking Number. NOD-2016-LV-0072
Permit No. NCO021971
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Adt:
A review of the February 2016 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the
deficiency(s) indicated below.
limit ft dance Deflren (Si'
Sample Limit Reported
Location Parameter Date Value Value Type of Deficiency
009 Effluent Turbidity (00070) /10/2016 5o 54 Daily Maximum Exceeded
Please be aware that non-compliance with your permit could result in enforcement action by the Division of
Water Resources for these and any additional violations of State law. The Mooresville Regional Office
encourages you to take all necessary actions to bring your facility into compliance.
If you should need any assistance or would like to discuss this non-compliance situation, please contact Wes
Bell of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704- 6 -1699.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
MROWater Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDE
Cc. WQS Mooresville Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDE5 Compliance/Enforcement Unit - Enforcement File
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality I Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
704-663-1699'

r r i
YaR 9x+F1!9JJ .6k., VAN "'"3.
Certified Mail *70151520 0002 6984 7726
HAMM RgWO Ramoftif
July 15, 2016
Timothy d At
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 S Main 'St
Findlay, ©H 45840
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLA71ON
Tracking Number: NOV-2016-LV-0396
Permit No. NCO021971
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Aydt:
A review of the January2016 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject` facility revealed the violation(s)
indicated below:
Limit'Vi l
Sample Limit Reported
Location Parameter bate Value Value Type of Violation
010 Effluent Turbidity (00070) 1/20/2016 50 72 wily Maximum Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The Division of
Water Resources may pursue enforcement' actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are of a
continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent (SOC).
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 2 115
704=663-16 9

Memvow a�
AL
1A Z
Certified Mail #7015 1520 0002 6984 7757
Retu
rn Rggg:ipft 8MUSAgd
July 19, 2016
Timothy I At
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 S Main St
Findlay, OH i 45840
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking Number: NOV-2016-LV-0405
Permit No. NCO021971
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Aydt:
A review of the March 2016 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the violation(s)
indicated below:
Limit EXOgdano
Sample Limit Reported
Location Parameter Date Value Value Type of Violation
009 Effluent Turbidity (00070) 3/11/2016 so 240 Daily Maximum Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already Implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The Division of
Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the Violations are of a
continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special, Order by Consent (SOC).
State of Nordi Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
704-663-1699

Bell, Wes
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) <tgleight marathonpetroleum com>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 201610:51 AM
To. Denard, Derek
Cc: Bell, Wes; Hennessy, Jahn; Corporon, Joe; Basinger, Corey; Jarabeck, Bob (MPC)
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Charlotte East Terminal (NCO021971.) & Charlotte West Terminal
(NCO046213) NPDES Permit Change Request & Guidance
Attachments: [Llntitled],pdf
Derek:
I apologize for not responding to your email below in a more timely fashion. I have been conducting Tier It
Environmental Audits at several of our asphalt & light product terminals and headed right into a "salt Water fishing"
vacation (my wife's'favorite activity), I appreciate the effort & time your Compliance& Expedited Permitting Unit took
to evaluate Marathon's request, providing a well written regulatory review and giving suggestions to assist in
maintaining the Charlotte East Terminal (NCO021971) in compliance with our NPDES permit effluent discharges.
Bath your and Wes Bell provided ideas on reducing or eliminating the turbidity potential. Turbidity Reduction Tools we
are Investigating.
• West mentioned a specific type Floc soft sock boom or Floc Snake that reduces turbidity in storm
water. Located information on this type product, it looks promising.
• As you mentioned, polymers such a PAM. I located information produces) by the US EPA for Storm Water Best
Management Practice - Turbidity Control, that is also safe for aquatic life, etc. (anionic polymer carrying a
negative charge). We will investigate and run it through your office and Mooresville.
• We have met with Rain For Rent on -site to discuss ghat Turbidity reduction services they can; provide, i.e.
equipment, flocculation, booms, etc. We are currently evaluating their proposal for services,
In addition to the above and as I mentioned in my original June 3, 2016, email, we are currently utilizing:
• Silt fences
• Rip rap & rip rap dams with silt screens
• Installing fabric luring and drainage tiles within the dike floors,
• Utilizing vacuum trucks to remove soil mud from crack pots and exposed lining (with increased maintenance of
these areas during construction)
• Utilizing wooden planks and rocks for vehicle/equipment travel within diked areas
• Retention of water in dike areas and retention pond to allow for the settling out of the red clay components
• Emphasizing with on -site contractors the high importance of eliminating practices that result in potential for
excessive turbidity (reducing soil disturbance, plan ahead on steps in a project so that you don't disturb an area
more than truce, use of appropriate silt control, etc.
Again, I grant to thank you for taping the time to review our request and providing suggestions for controlling turbidity
beyond what we have implemented to date. In talking with John avid Neal, Terminal Supervisor he had received the
results from the on -site inspection and record review conducted by Wes Bell at both the Charlotte East & West
Terminals. I have attached above the Charlotte East Report which indicate a positive inspection report. Review of the
Outfa'll discharges that occurred for April, May & June 2016, confirm that the discharge effluent was well below the
permit's turbidity limits,
As I mentioned to Wes, anyone from the Division is welcome to visit the Charlotte East/West Terminal at any time. We
appreciate the "third eye" reviewing our sites. We get a new view and potential ways to solve any potential NP DES
concerns that are out there. Tom
,t

Thomas G. Leigh
Senior H S Professional
€€>nal
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Edon
Cell. < 1.3.3 4.750
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
dance
per design, installation, operation, and r' aint(
)ermit footnote:
uiPSd i.14 WJG Cf :4 iR4'..YG EG,f �rA i& t:6#14d F1dil tX#F LLfVG
2
>ermit
Y'
G na e NonpoinT source
th all specifications
eceiin
!Is. Non-
)idity
reds 50 NTU. Similarly,
.

X
9MPs that came to mind are polymers such as PAM. However, I'm not sure what is and is not approved by our Division.
First, you may want to discuss such BMPs with the regional office staff in Mooresville. if you need technical assistance
with possible BMPs we can get you in touch with contacts or some information.
if you have any questions or want to discuss further, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N,C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department rtment of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek. enard ncdenr. ov
1. C. division of Water Resources
WQ Permitting Section —Wastewater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 7699-1617
w a tnirr9 ares,,,,,.,,.
Email it; correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina dtic Records tvaw and may be discussed to third parties.
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) f mailto:t leiRh ix marathon etroleum.comj
Sent: Friday, June 03, 201 1:16 PM
To: Lenard, Derek cderek.denard ncdenr.goy>
Cc: Bell, Wes <wes belIPncdenr. ov>
Subject: Charlotte East Terminal-(NC0021971) & Charlotte West Terminal'(NC0046213) NPDES Permit Change Request
Guidance
Derek:
I have been working with Wes Bell from the Mooresville Regional Office on concerns related to turbidity at the MP
Blanchard — Charlotte East Terminal (NPLES Permit NC0021971). This included his on -site inspection and record review
of the terminal on May 19, 2016 & several phone discussions with both Wes and the Regional' Supervisor, Carey
Basinger. Please note that during the past year we have been conducting major terminal upgrades which include:
• removal of nine out -of -service storage tanks
• removal of underground piping & piping dead legs (then moving these lines to above grade to reduce potential
corrosion & not easily detected spill release points)
• repairing and expansion of the dike containment system to meet SPCC requirements

A . 4
Cell: 813.344.7504
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
tglei,[e-mail]

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secwtary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENViROMMENTAL QUALITY
June 24, 2016
t
Bradley McKain
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 S Main Si
Findlay, OH 45840 �
Subject: NPDES Electronic Reporting Requirements
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
NPDES Permit Number: NCO021971
Gear NPDES Permittee:
The U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) recently published the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule. The rule requires NPDES regulated facilities t
report information electronically, instead of filing written paper reports. The rule does not change what
information is required from facilities, It only changes the method -bywhich information is provided (i.e.,
electronic rather than paper -based).
EPA; is phasing in the requirements of the rule over a 5-year period. The two phases of the rule, and their
key milestones, are:
• Phase 1—Starting can December 21, 2016, regulated entities thatarerequired to submit Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) will begin submitting these reports electronically. if you are currently
reporting your DMR data electronically using eDMR, then you simply need to continue reporting
in the same way as you are now. The key change is that, starting on December 21, 2016,
electronic reporting of DMRs will be required, instead of voluntary,
• Phase 2-Starting can December 21, 2020, regulated entities that are required to submit certain
other NPDES reports will begin submitting these reports electronically. Reports covered in the
second phase include Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with an NPDES general permit,
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports, and a number of other NPDES program reports.
Incorporating Electronic Reporting Requirements into NPDES Permits
The NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule requires authorized NPDES programs to incorporate electronic
reporting requirements into NPDES permits beginning December 21, 2015. Under the new rule, the
electronic reporting process supersedes the paper reporting process. According to our files, your NPDES
permit became effective after November 2013, and should contain the requirement to electronically
report your Discharge Monitoring Reports using NC DWR's eDMR system.
In addition to requiring permittees to report information electronically, the rule also requires permittees
to identify the initial recipient for the NPDES electronic reporting data [see 40 CFR 122,41(1)(9)]. Initial
State ofNortlz Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail ServicQ Center I Raleigly Nortb Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities (initial recipient) means the
entity (EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES Data [see 40 CFR 127.2(b)]. Permittees are required to electronically'
submit the required NPDES information to the appropriate initial recipient, as determined by EPA. By July
18, 2016, EPA must identify and publish on its web site and in the Federal Register a listing of initial
recipients by state and by NPDES data group, Once available, you can use EPA's web site to find out or
determine the initial recipient of your electronic submission.
NC'DWR has submitted a request to EPA to be the initial recipient for the following NPDES data groups.
1. Discharge Monitoring Reports;
2. General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOIs); Notices of Termination (NOTs)],
3. Pretreatment Program Reports; and
4, Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
EPA's web site will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for each type of electronic
submission for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting
tool will be available as well.
For more information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, visit
htt` : www2.e a. ov com liance final -national- ollutant-dischar e-elimination-s stem-n des-
electronic-reporting-ru1 . For more information on electronic reporting to NC DWR, visit
htt' . de .nc. ov about divisions water -resources' e mr/npdes-eIectronic-rtpgrting or contact Vanessa
Manuel at 919-807-6392 or via email at Vanessa Manuel@ncdenr ov.
Sincerely,
J ey 0. P
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.

Governor^
NA I R,.." DER VAART
Secretary
WaterResources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY l7lreeirrr
June 2, 201
Mr. Terry Swick, Terminal Manager '
BlanchardTerminal Company, LLC
7401 Old Mount Holly Read
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Blanchard Terminal Company, L.LC
Charlotte lotte East Terminal
LIES Permit No. NCO021971
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Swick:
Enclosed: is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
at the subject facility on May 19, 2016 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at 704) 235- 1 2, or via email at es.bell(7a, edenr aov.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section:.
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc Rusty Roz ell , MCWQI'
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
State of North Carolina ( Environmental Quality ( Water Resources ( Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Offioe 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699:

w United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved,
EPA A Washington, D.C. 20460 OMS No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires -31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fee Type
1 3 NCO021971 11 121 16/05119 117 181,,1 1 S 120LJ
LJ Lij
21
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA
� ( -----.--Reserved------
Ci:
1.0 701. 1 71 t� 2 t,.,:...1 7 74 751 1 1 1 80
Li
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPD S permit Number) 09:50AiM 16/05/19 15/07/01
Charlotte Terminal (outfell 009)
7401 Old Mount Holly Rd Exit TimelDate permit Expiration Date
Charlotte NC 28214 01.10PM 16105/19 20/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Numbers) Other Facility Data
t//
Terry Lee Swicktt704-392-1345 /
Name, Address of Responsible cialCtitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
T J Aydt,539 S Main St Findlay OH 45840/Presidentt419-421-3774/4194214216
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit N Flow Measurement operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment urnrn)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of or(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wes Bell MRr C704- 63-1699 Ext.2192/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-2 5-2194/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previouo editions are obsolete.
Page#

Permit: NCO021971 owner - Facility: Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Inspection Crate. 05/1912016 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
ire mt
YesNo NA PIE
(If the present permit expires in fi months or leas). Has the permitter submitted a new
©
❑
so
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
©
11
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
Q
11
11
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■'
©
013
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
D
11
11
Comment: The last gompliance evaluation ins ection was gerformed at the facility MCW
P gtafn
on 8/29/15.
Record Kee Ing
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
®
©
11
11
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
M
11
0
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
a
Q
0
0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
a
®
0
1
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
0
0
00
Dates, times and location of sampling
0
Flame of individual performing the sampling
a
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete. do they include all permit parameters?
8
©
0
0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and i lWQ?
0
©
8
11
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Igo they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
©
8
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
❑
®
a
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
11
0
9
11
Is a copy of the current NPO S permit available on site?
0
©
0
11
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Q
0
Comment: The records reviewed Burin ' the ins ectign were -organized and well maintained.
Monitoring Reports DMRs were reviewed for the period June 2015 through March
Eigily maximum effluent turbidity violations were re orted in December 2015 Qu
Janus 2a16 CJutfall tilil Februa 2010 Cutfall 009 and M r h 2016 4utfall
Discharge
2016.
all 009
t}20
.
These violations will be se aratel addressed b the Division g s etc. .
Page#
3

Permit: NCO021971 Owner - Facility: Chatiotte Terminal (outfail 009)
Inspection Date: 06/1912016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
t eratlons & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Comment: The site gLounds were well maintained. Qn-site construction activities are gn-goingthat
include im rovements to the conveyance and treatment of stormwater. The discharges
from both outfalls can be manually controlled by a valve system,
i
.1y dike ins ections and weekly CC ins ections are peLormed and documented. All
accumulated water from the loading rack is collected into the PCW Tank. The PCW tank is
tum ed out by a contracted company AEC Holdings, LLQ on an as -needed basis. The
tank was last pumDed in April 2016-
The facility sampled and complied with all Oermit limits during the last hydrostatic testing
euentsldischaroes in 2014.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is flow meter used for reporting? 0 ®
El 11
Is flow meter calibratedannually? 0< ©
0 11
Is the flow meter operational? a ©
11 11
(if units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 110
ME]
Comment: Both outfalls are eggipged with in -line flow meters (totalizers). The flow meters were last
calibrated on 5/11/15 by Sparlino.
Effluent Pie Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? Ms Q
0 11
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? El El
M 11
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required); are they operating properly? ❑ ©
0 ❑
Comment: No discharges were observed from Outfalls 009 and 010 during the ins 'ection
Page# 5

4
PAT . RORY
DONAL .« VAN DER VAART
War r R sour
S. JAY T T1 OMAN
i' &Ed^bMil+9 AL OUALItY
Ceirtified Mail # 7015 1520 0002 8376 3255
gturn R h)t Reguested
April 6, 2016
Timothy J Aydt
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 S Main St
Findlay, OH 45840
SUBJECT. NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking Number: N©V-2016-LV-0190
Permit No. NCO021971
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Aydt:
A review of the December 2015 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the
violation(s) indicated below:
Limit Exceedance ViolationCs):
Sample Limit
Reported
Location Parameter Date Value
Value Type of Ululation
^� ,--k.*A*.4 M n A 7M ll)/,),)/I)ni q n
64 Daily Maximum Exceeded

Bell, Wes
From. Swick Terry L. (MPQ <t1swick@marathonpetroleumcom>
Sent.: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 7:42 AM
To: Leigh, Thomas O. (MPQ Bell, Wes
Cc: Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPQ
Subject: RE: Requested Information
Good Job Thomas';
The only correction I would like to make is that of Charlotte East Terminal the zip is 28214.
Jew
efimfow, Ne (` ea) eha%6m, N (f),Te 7
From. Leigh, Thomas G. (MPQ
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:18 PM
To: Bell, Wes (wes:bell ncdenr. ov)
Cc: Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPQ; 5wick, Terry L. (MPQ
Subject: Requested Information
Wes:
I enjoyed talking to you this afternoon. As I suspected I had your email already. As we discussed here is the listings for
Mr. Aydt
1. Timothy J. Aydt, President
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
539 South Main Street
Findlay, Ohio 45840-3229
t'a dt marathon etroleum.cim
AKA the Charlotte East Terminal (Blanchard Terminal Company LLC — Charlotte Terminal)
7401 Old Mount Holly Read
Charlotte, NC 28208 28214
. Timothy J. Aydt, Deputy Assistant Secretary
Marathon Petroleum Company, LP
Same address, etc.
AKA the Charlotte West Terminal (Marathon Petroleum Company LP Charlotte Terminal
8035 Mt. Holly Road
Paw Creek, NC 2 214
Both Charlotte East (Blanchard) and Charlotte West (Marathon) have the same mailing address.
t

00075
Thomas G. Leigh
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Cell: 813.344.7SO4
Tel: [phone] Et 27
t lei marathon etroleum.com
2

A1*LW!V;YV4
t
NCDENR iLE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reso rces
Pat McCrory Donald van der aart
Governor Secretay
September 15, 2015
Mr. T.J. Aydt, President
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
539 South Main Street
Findlay, OH 45840-3229
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Blanchard Terminal Co., LLC/Charlofte Terminal
NPDES Permit NCO021971
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr, Aydt:
On August 29, 2015, Mr. Charlie Hansen of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP)
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working
agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Resources (DWR). Please ensure that a
copy of the enclosed inspection report is forwarded to the facility's environmental compliance staff.
The inspection report should be self-explanatory-, however, should you have -any questions concerning
the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes Bell of this Office at [phone] and/or Mr. Hansen at
[phone], or at wes,beII0,ncdepL.goy and william,hansenp—mecklenburacount vnc.00v.
Sincerely,
z"
VLy
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, DENR
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: MSC 1617 — Central files basement
Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
WB
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] � Fax: [phone] t Custorner Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet, http://portal,ncdenrorg1web1wq
An Cqual Opportunity 1Affirmative Action Employer- 50% RecycledilGlYa Post Consumer paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved,
PA Washington, D,G, 20460 OMB No, 040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8- 1-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrfmo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
U NCO021971 111 12 15108/29 17 18 � 19
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating BI QA
71
I ..J Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Numbers 09.00AM 1 /O8129 15107101
Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Exit TlmetDate Permit Expiration Date
7401 Old Mount Holly Rd
Charlotte NC 28214 11:30AM 15/08/ 9 20106/30
Name(s) of Onsite, epresentative(s)IT!tl s(s)/Phone and Fax Numbers) Other Facility Data
#1
Brandon Lyon/Supervisor Terminal//
Name, Address of ResponsibleOfficial/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
T J A dt,5 9 S Main St Findlay OH 45840/President141 21.3774/41 4214216
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance~ Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review EffluentfReceiving Waters Laboratory
Section CI: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Water Quality Program Meckenburg County MRO WQ/1704-36-449/
Signature of Management Q A Ftelvl er Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wes Bell 9� v ' ?r j� MRCS WQ//7Q4-663-16 g E t. 1 �,� �1 r
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

Permit: NCO0 1971 Owner - Facility. Charlotte Terminal loutfall 009) ,
Inspection Date. 08129/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
ire tt Yes No NA L49
(if the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 00HO
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? is El Q El
Are there any special conditions for the permit? 11 0 110
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 El 110
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment: The orooertv is fenced and gated.
The Igg scam Rance evaluation Inspection was Derformed at the facility on 11121/11 by
MCWtP staff:
Record KeeRing Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? no 00
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 0 Q El
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? ■ 0 0 p
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? In 0 Q El
Is the chain -of -custody complete? 0 0 130
Dates, times and location of sampling 11
Name of individual performing the sampling 11
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported CQCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? d El
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and C? ?
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 11
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation Crag available and current? ©; El Is Q
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 11 © 0 13
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Q Q In 13
Comment: All files were made available to the inspectors art the time;of the ins action. The C}MRs for
May 2014 May 2015 were reviewed during the inspection. No discreDancies found. All
QMRs, were found to be fully com fete during the Leview process.
Page# 3

Permits NCO021971 owner . Facility. Charlotte Terminal (ou€rall 009)
formed by certified personnel or laboratory?
❑
(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
ontract lab? '
Q
set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6,0 degrees
11
n) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+I- 0.2 degrees?
11
C
>_0.0 degrees Celsius +1-1.0 degrees?
0
Q
Is composite sampling flaw proportional? © 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? IN Q
Is proper volume collected? 11 0
Is the tubing clean? �J C
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Cl El
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type 11 Q
representative)?
Comment: The sub"ect ermit re uires effluent grab sam its:
QUE tiona & Maintenance Yes Ng
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Solids, p, EEC), Sludge Judge, and either that are applicable?
Comment: All contact water is hauled off -site by Nt aco. The haulin
is documented with dates
h
gggnft and fire ar es stormwaer from their secondary
coot inment areas. The ORC:, kee" s a Log book detailin 'a
dail -Ins ection checklist as a
QA/QC measure.
Flaw Measurement - Effluent
Ye
o NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
11
©
11
11
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
0
0110
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flaw meter?
©Q
a
11
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated annuals Sparling instruments. Tht flow meter was ut
on-line July23.2015.
Page#
4

Permit, NCO021971 Owner - Facility Charlotte Terminal (outfall 009)
Inspection Date: 08129/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flaw Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Effluent floe Yes g NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? M 0 Q
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? M ❑ 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required)are they operating properly? © 0 N ❑
Comment: &the time of the Ins ection there was ng dig_hUr e ggmingfrom the outfall, No si ns of
ollution were noted at the discharae or receivina stream.
Page# s

Allocco, Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G, (MPQ <[e-mail]>
Sent Sunday, April 06, 20141:16 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia; David.Caldwell@mecklenburgcountync#gov, Jeff Mitchell
(Jeff.mitchell@ c lenb rgcount c,gov)
Cc: Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPQ
Subject: Marathon Petroleum Company LP and Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Mecklenburg
County Bulk Gasoline Terminals - NPDES Information
Marcia.
As a fallow up to our April 1, 2014 phone conversation please find below the contact information for the two hulk
gasoline terminals that Marathon Petroleum Company operates in Mecklenburg County. In addition, 1 have included
information related to our February DMRs for each terminal:
1 Marathon Petroleum Company'
Permit !Number. NCO046213
Terminal dame: Charlotte West
Contacts:
Responsible Official
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
By. MPC Investment LLC its General Partner
By: T. f. Aydt, Deputy Assistance Secretary
Phone: [phone]
Email: t`a dt marathon etraleum,co
Terminal Manager
Terry L. Swik
Phone. 704.399,3371
Email: tlswick [e-mail]
Terminal Supervisor
Brandon Lyon
Phone. 704.392.345
Email; bml on marathon etrlum.ccim
Southern Region Environmental Contact
Thomas G. Leigh
Phone; 813.344.7504
Email. t !ei h marathon etroleum.om
DIVIR Contact
Dawn Benjamin
Phone:419,421.20 9
Email. [e-mail]
,t

Terminal Company LLC
"W"No"Now
lame. Charlotte East
W,
le Official
Aydt, President
9.421.4422
tdt(o)marathonbetroleum.com
- of contacts for the Blanchard Terminal (Charlotte East) are the same as listed also`
ebruary 2014 Explanation
West Per it Number: NCB 046213. Qut all 001
were within authorized limits.
severe weather, analysis for turbidity was delayed and cot
►te 2. Discussion with Terminal Operations and Management confirmed that terrainz
it and that there was no activity on -going that could have impacted
Toxicity results. Due to the fact that all other parameters were within permitted lin
ping different was happening at the Terminal, the cause of the Acute
icity failure is unknown.
Test fro
paramel
permit p
W
Note 4. Due to severe weather, analysis for turbidity was delayed and conducted outside of the 48-
hour holding time. The lab result was 1.8 NTU and the field result was 8.87 NTUe
2

Sample Event: 2-11-2014 j(tMEqar[cmh_Z2!8gDMR Submit al No Outfall listed since Agency aDDroved alternative
#JLscharqe point or the h drostatic TestL- Permit parameters demonstrated compliance, except that Prism
Laboratories analyzed and reported Phenol and MTBE but not report ethanol.
Note S. Due to severe weather, analysis for turbidity was delayed and conducted outside of the 48-
hour holding time. The lab result was 1,6 NTU and the field result was 1.67 NTU
Note 6. A pre -hydrostatic discharge sample was collected and analyzed and demonstrated compliance
with the permit limit. Ethanol was run and recorded by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
This data was included in the March 28, 2014 DMR.
Note 7. In follow-up discussions with Prism Laboratories, Inc., MPC was informed that the lab had run
ethanol on the 2-11-2014 sample event but inadvertently left it off the report to IVIPC. Prism Lab
reissued the report and MPC' s Dawn Benjamin will submit the revised DIVIR to Central files, Division of
Water Quality, Raleigh, NC.
As discussed with each of you, MPC is working to eliminate potential NPDES Discharge Outfall concerns at the Charlotte
East and West Terminals. MPC will be applying for the appropriate applications for reworking our storm water flow and
subsequent outfall discharges' influent. If you should have any questions or would like to meet with myself and the
Terminal Management please let me know. MPC is always open to suggestions on better ways to meet our compliance
obligations. I can be reached at one of the numbers listed below or via email at tglei ghAmarathon vetroleurn.com. In
addition, Dawn Benjamin is MPC's contact for all DRM questions. She can be reached at the number listed in the above
contact information section of this email. Thank you. Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

A=*At
V
. e L
NCDENR
{{ty
i
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
February 6, 2014
Mr. Bradly R. McKain
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
539 South Main Street ,
Findlay, OH 45340
Subject; Notice of Deficiency - Effluent Limitation
Tracking #; NOD-2014-LV-013
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC - Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO021971
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Mclain
A review of the October'2013 self -monitoring report for the subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outfall 309;
Date Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
10/17/13 T S 51.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L (Daily maximum)
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the causes(s) of the noted
violation. Unresolved violations may lead to the issuance of a Notice of Violation and/or assessments
of civil penalties by the Division of Water Resources.
If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation acid/or maintenance problems, and
you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special
Order by Consent (SOC).
Thank you for your attention to this matter.If you have questions concerning this matter or to apply
for a SOC, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Marcia Allocco at (704) 2 -2204.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
cc; Point Source Branch
R. Rozzelle, MCWQP
MA
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] S Fax: [phone] i CustomerService: 1-877-623- 748
Internet: http://portal,nrdenr.org/web/wq
An Equal Opportunity �' Affirmative Action Employer - 30%1, Recycledd0% Past Consumer paper
One
NofthCarohna

Allocco, Marcia
From: Sledge, Bob
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE.- BP Terminal - NCO021971 Question
Hi Marcia,
I didn't see the name change request go through with all the required documentation, but I was aware that a sale was
pending. Blanchard representatives were in touch with us prior to the sale in November 2012, anticipating a closing of
the deal in January 2013. It looks like that happened as planned. Unfortunately, with our admin situation being as it is,
the follow up on name/ownership changes has been slow. I'll check on the status of any paperwork, and will send you a
copy if/when I find it.
2##
Thanks,
Marcia
Marcia Allocco, MS - Environmental Chemist
NC Dept. of Env. & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Group
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
marcia,aIlocco(&ngdgpr.gov
www.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation,
I

August 10, 2012
RECEiVED
DIVISION OF WA-,�-R QUALITY
AUG 13 1
y� M
MOOREV ILLS REGIONAL OFFICE
State of North Carolina RP
Department tment of Environment and Natural Resources
Department of Water Quality - Surface Water
610 East Center Ave.
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC" 28115
To Whom It May Concern:
Rho Products North America Inc,
7401 told Mt. Holy Roan
Charlotte, NC 28214
USA
BP Products North America
NPDES Permit IBC O0219 1
As reported to your office on Wednesday, .August 8, 2012, there was a release of
mixture of water and fire -fighting foam offsite at the BP Products North America BP
Charlotte Terminal.: The terminal is located at 7401 Old Mt. holly Road. in Charlotte and
discharges to Paw Creek under the above -referenced NPI. ES permit number.
At approximately 8:15 PM on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, following a brief thunderstorm,
the fire suppression system at the facility loading rack was activated. At this time it is
believed that the system activation was due to a compromised pull station.
The fire suppression system released fire -fighting foam throughout the loading rack and
surrounding areas. A portion of the foam entered the non-petrolu -contact area
(parking lot) surface water drainage system. The discharge valve for this drainage system
is normally maintained in the open position. In the event of a catastrophic release, this
valve is closed by facility personnel, if it is safe to do so. Shortly after the activation of
the fire -suppression system, this discharge valve was closed in an effort to retain the
foam onsite.
At approximately 10:00 AM on Wednesday,;August 8, 2012 BP was notified by the
Charlotte Fire Department that foam was present at 3 offsite locations. BP immediately
investigated the locations and sent the spill response contractor to address the
accumulated foam. The locations where foam was found are indicated on the attached
map.
Two representative of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program inspected the site
and the ofTsite foam locations at approximately 12:30 PM on Wednesday August 8.
At the present time, BP believes that the off -site impacts of the foam have been
eliminated.

EIV
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 704-399-39 5 or at
MMagribe, th. Dob bias @ bp. c oni.
Sincerely,
Marib tb Dobbins,;PE, CSP
Enviromnental Coordinator
cc: Rad Murphy® B
Andrew Martin - Mecklenburg County Water Quality

Allocco, Marcia
From: Pugh; lames L.
Seat: Wednesday, April 11, 201 2:41 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: Classification of NCO021971- BP terminal
Fallow Up Flag: Follow up
Due By: Friday, April 20, 2012 4:00 PM
Flag Status. Flagged
Thanks for this info. System will be declassified.
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:44 A
T: Pugh, .dames La
Cc: Sifford, Barbara; keith.lewis b .co
Subjects Classification of NCO021971 -, BP Terminal
James,
MRO noted in the recent inspection for NCO021971 that their ORC and back-up ORC were invalid for not
paying the +annual fees. I received a call this morning from Keith Lewis at BP regarding the classification of the
system. He noted that they removed the oil water separator at the facility. in 2008/2009 and he thought the
facility had been declassified. However, BIMS still has a PC-1 classification for the permitted facility.
I have attached the most recent description page for NCO021971 (2011-no oil/water separator in the
description) along with the pricer permit (2006) that notes the oil/water separator. Since the treatment systems
have been removed I would think we could declassify the system.
Could you look at the attached and forward any letter you generate regarding the classification of the system to
Mr. Keith Lewis of BP products North America, LLC at 7401 told Mount Holly Road, Charlotte, NC 28214
Thanks for; your assistance on this
Marcia
Marcia Allocco, MS - Environmental Chemist
NC Dept. of Env. & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Quality'- Surface Water Protection Group
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: (704) 2 - 204 Fax; [phone]
marc�a.allocco�ncenr.ctt�v
WWL.ncwater uality.org
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Lair and may be
disclosed to 'third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation,
1

A•
rr NCDENR F I LE/,�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 4, 2012
Mr. R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manger
BP Products No America, Inc.
7401 Old Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
BP Termfinal/Tr ansMontaigne WWTP
7401 Old Mt. Holly Road
NPDES Permit No. NCO021971
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Lewis:
On November 21, 2011, Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP)
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The enclosed
report should be self-explanatory. Please be advised that there is an issue with the certification for
the two operators designated for the system as noted in the Permit section of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to call Ms.
Allocco or me at this office.
Sincerely,
fo r Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc.- Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
RBK/adm
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phow [phone] t Fax. [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NdfthCarohna
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportumtyi. Affirmative Action Employer - 3M,'6 Recycledi10% Post Consumer paper ;Vaturally

ted States Envi
otection Agen
)460
NCO021971 11/11f 1 C
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Progr;
Facility Self -Monitoring Rating B1 G
4 N I
cility Inspected: Entry Time/Dal
11/21/2011
,eek 2:00 PM'
Exit Time/Date
11/21/211
:00 PM'
mentatives/Title/Phone Number.
399-3371
�spon ibie Official:
Tuley Ter
Phone N
Contacte
sone:
`-NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
Marcia Allocco ;x Surface Water Protection - Mooresville Regional Office
EPA Form 560-3 (Rev 9-4) Previous editions are obsolete
❑ Other:
Bate.
December 6, 2011
Date:
)n

EFFLUENTIRECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a riprap ditch, which
discharges to Paw Creek segment 1-12, which is a Class C water in the Catawba River Basin. The
receiving water did not appear to be adversely affected by the facility's effluent.
LOW MEASUREMENT.
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the amount of drainage
area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
SELF -MONITORING PR GRA
Discharge Monitoring Reports ( MRs) were reviewed for the period October 2919 through September 2911,
The reports indicate that the facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period. Records indicate that
all parameters are being monitored at the proper frequency and location in accordance with permit
requirements.'

Lab Certificati r

icrth Carolina
IVI,VII V'; Yvan;' d,ity
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins fee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 12, 2011
Mr. R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manager
BP Products North America, Inc.
7401 Cold Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 221
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
7401 Old Mt. holly Rd,
NPDES Permit No. NC O021971
Mecklenburg County, ,ti C
Dear M. Lewis:
Can November 20, 2010, Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County eater Quality Program (MCWQP)
conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as Part of a cooperative
working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The enclosed
report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning, this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to call fits.
All ,cco or me at this office.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Rozelle, MCWrQP
Kladrz
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 One
Phone; (704) 663-160 t Pax: (704) 663-60401 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: wwwr.nc aterquality.org 7 tw vyfl i

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved,
EPA Washington, DC 20460 OMB No, 2040-0017
Approval Expires 8131/98
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NRDES Y./Mo/Day Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
N NC00219711 10/11 i29 C C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Rating BI QA Reserved
0.5 4 N N
Name and l ovation of Facility inspected. Entry 7irraeli3ate: Permit Effective:'
February itD, 06
74fi1 ld t. Holly Rd. Exit Time/bate: Perr»it Expires;
Mecklenburg County, NC June 30, 2010
3:00 PM
Narne(s) of On -Site Re prose ntatives/Titte/P hone Number:
Mr Keith Lewis / ORC / [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title: Terminal Manager/ORIII C
Mr, R. Keith Lewis
BP Terminal/Paw Creek
7401 Old Mt. Holly Rd, Phone Number: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28214
Contacted: Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During 'Inspectio
Z Permit Z Flow Measurement Z operations & Maintenance El Sewer Overflow
Z Records/Reports Z Self -Monitoring Program [I Sludge Handling Disposal Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review El Compliance Schedules El Pretreatment Program El Multimedia
Z Effluent/Receiving Waters Z Laboratory Stormwater Q Other:
LEE:
See Attached Summary
Signatures) ho
ignaturols)6 lnspector(sF _Agency_10ff_ice_1Te1ene: Date: p­_­
Andrew Martin MCWQP/[phone] January
�201 1
_Signature of —Reviewer: — —Agency—/Office: Date:
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
_EtL Office January Marcia Allocco Surface Water Protection - MooresvilLe ional 011
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete

F F_
GENERAL:
The Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program ('_—,v'IC'\k QP) last inspected the facility on August 2 I
2009. A Compliance Evaluation inspection. Report was issued on September 1 , 2009.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on January 1, 2011, and is valid through June 30,'015. This
permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater and loading rack washwater fromx. Outfall 009. 1n April 200
permission was given to remove the oil/water separators. Since the oil/water separators have been removed, the
portion of the facility associated with the NPD S treatment works and discharge only consists of containment
basin discharges.
The certification classification for NCO021971 requires that the facility have an operator in responsible
charge (O C) with a Grade 1 Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System (PC-1) certification. The
facility is staffed ({SRC and back-up) with personnel that possess the appropriate operator certification.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period October 2009 through September
2010. Self -monitoring records and operator visitation/maintenance fogs were readily available during time
inspection. All reviewed records, reports, and logs were clear and well maintained.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW.
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, kerosene, and ethanol storage and distribution. 'ash -down
water and storm —water draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are stored in a. 10,000-gallon
aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility. Stormwater surrounding the
aboveground storage tanks is collected in containment basins. This water is held in the containment basins until
it is manually released after a visual inspection for any sheen. The facility has completed construction of an
ethanol storage tank and currently stores ethanol on the property. All of the major components of the Outfall
009 treatment works were in service and appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
EFFLUENT/RE CE VING 'WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outi'all 009 consists of a riprap ditch,
which discharges to an Unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C. water in the Catawba River Basin:
The receiving water did not appear to be adversely affected by the facility's effluent.
`LOW IYMEASUREMENT.
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the amount of
drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period October 2009 through September
2010. The reports indicate that the facility was meeting permit effluent limits during this period.. Records

indicate that all parameters are being monitored at the proper frequency and location in accordance with permit
requirements.
LABORATORY:
The permittee contracts with Pace analytical Charlotte (NC Lab Certification 453422, 412 & 437706),
Pace Analvtical Asheville (LN,,C Lab Certification r119, #40 & 437712), and Pace Analytical Eden (NLC Lab
Certification 4633 & 937738) to perform analytical monitoring, Pace Anat"tical was not evaluated during the
inspection.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Stormwater in the diked
basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prior to discharge.

NCDENR
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality'
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins lee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 15, 2009
Mr. R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manger
BP Products North America, Inc.
7401 Old Mt. holly Road
Charlotte, NC 2814
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
BP Te irallTransMontaigne WWTP
401 Old Mt. holly Rd
NPIES Permit No. NC0021971
Mecklenburg County, ,NC
Dear Mr. Lewis:
On August 31, 2008, Mr. Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
MC W CAP} conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of a
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The
enclosed report should be self --explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to
call Ms. Marcia. Alloccc or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
for° Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty R.oelle, MCWCP
RBKJadm
File: WC N 0021971BPTerminal09.doc
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location: 610 East Center Ave„ Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service; 1-87-623-6748

GENERAL:
mber 3, 2008. A Compliance Evalua
T.
I rhea
MhUeut 1AMILULIQnS anu ivionuviing iE.uquir
Since the oil/water separators have
with the NPDES treatment works and disch-,
The certification classification for N1
in responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade 1
I Program (NIC W Q F) last inspectect the tacility
,n Inspection Report was issued on November 7,
ebruary 10, 2006, and is valid through June 30,
�ormwater and loading rack washwater from
n to remove the oil/water separators. The facility
)il/water separators have been removed from the
also added quarterly ethanol sampling to the
nts.
t removed, the portion of the facility associated
only consists of containment basins.
21971 requires that the facility have an operator
rsical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification,
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period August 2008
through July 2009. Self -monitoring records and operator visitation/maintenance logs were
Zn
readily available during the inspection. All reviewed records, reports, and logs were clear and
well maintained.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and storrawater draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are stored in a
I 0,000-gallon aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility.
Storinwater surrounding the aboveground storage tanks is collected in containment basins. This
water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for
any sheen. The facility has completed construction of an ethanol storage tank, but does not
currently store ethanol on the property.
All of the major components of the Outfall 009 treatment works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a riprap
ditch, which discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in the
Catawba River Basin. The receiving water did not appear to be adversely affected by the
facility's effluent.

FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period August 2008
through July 2009. The reports indicate that the facility was meeting permit effluent limits
during this period. Records indicate that all parameters are being monitored at the proper
frequency and location in accordance with permit requirements with the exception of ethanol.
Four violations (quarterly monitoring) have been generated by the Division of Water Quality's
compliance database since September 2008. However, the violations have been qualified
(explanation noted for violation) since the facility does not currently store ethanol.
LABORATORY:
The perinittee contracts with Pace Analytical Charlotte (IN"C Lab Certification #5342, 12
& 3 7706), Pace Analytical Asheville (INC Lab Certification #9, 40 & 3 7712), and Pace
Analytical Eden (INC Lab Certification #633 & 37738) to perform analytical monitoring. Pace
Analytical was not evaluated during the inspection.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Stormwater in
the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prior to discharge.

A"AN
NCDE
North Carolina Department of Enurr
Division of Wa
Beverly Eaves Perdue Cleen H.
Governer Direct
June 25,
49191111 i a
vm
nm nt and Natural R ure s
r Quality
.tllins Dee Freeman
Secretary
}09 t�m
ii
on
s. Maribeth E. Dobbins
P Products North America, Inc.
801 East Ordinance Road
Baltimore, MIS 2122
SUBJECT: Final Notice - Delinquent Annual Fee
Charlotte BP Terminal/Paw Creek
DES Permit NCO021971
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Dobbins:
All NPDES permittees must pay an Annual Compliance Monitoring Fee. The fee requirement is documented in
:your current permit at Part II Section B. 14. Division of Water (duality records indicate your annual fee for the
period November 1, 2008 — October 31, 2009 has not been paid. The amount owed is $860.00 a copy of the
invoice previously sent by the Division's Budget Office is attached.
Failure to pay the annual fee is grounds for revocation of your permit, as documented in part II. B.13 and
Il. B.1 . This matter must be promptly resolved.
This letter serves as final notice that the Division will refer the fee noted above to the North Carolina Attorney
General's Office for collection through the courts unless payment in the amount of $860.00 is received by July 31,
2009. Make checks payable to NC DENR and please include the permit number for which you are submitting
payment on the check.
If you Have evidence that the fee has already been paid, please contact me by phone at [phone] or via e-
mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Robert L. Sledge
Western NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
NPDES File
ec: Mooresville Regional Office — SWP Section
DWQ Budget Office - Fran McPherson
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 One
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Ofthai`Ohlla
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 f
Internet: wwvw.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

V7vm n17 1
)21971 Annual Fee Period: 2008-11-01 to 2009-10-31
lenburg County Invoice Bate: 12/16108
Otte BP Terminal/Paw Creek
Due bate: 01/15/09
Annual Fee: $860.00
erica Inc
ent to:
IDENR - Division of Water Quality
17 Mail Service Center
dleigh, NC 27699-1617
have any questions regarding this invoice, please contact the Annual Administering a7
'1.
Annual Fee., $860.00
Maribeth E. Bobbins
Big Products North America Inc Check Number:
7401 Old Mt Holly Rd
Charlotte, NC 28214

�+ A
No~
Mr, R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manger
BP Products North .America, Inc.
7401 Old Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 2821
SUBJECT: Cor
P
70
NPI
Me(
Lear Mr. Lewis:
On November 03, 2008, Mr. Andrew Ma
Vl�-4A
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William Cs, Rcss?r., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H, Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
ber 7, 2008
pliance Evaluation Inspection
erminal/TransMontaigne WWTP
Old Mt. Holly Rd.
ES Permit No. NCO021971
denburg County, N
,in of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
d LW yA 4bAtS ki£.di..+ ££:1yf. 1 VVA16A 6.4L 44tkd "— 8-OFVb.W..'k, — aJGi0.JJ.vv' R41 .—J a Y. iAl aJ 811V JV VL:1:V 3d xT 4c.1
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have questions concerning this report or any othermatters, please do not
hesitate to call Ms. Marcia Allocco or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
o r Robert 1 . Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Rusty Ro zelle, MCWQP
l/ad
File: W'Q BP' Terminal.0021971.1108.doc
One
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: yw°aw-,vacgjerr minty orb 610 Fast Center Ave, Suite 301 .Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]-623-67,18
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

]i
GENERAL:
The Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MCWQP) last inspected the facility
on September 25, 2007. A Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on October 05,
2007.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on February 10, 2006, and is valid through June 30,
2010. This permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater and loading rack wash rater from
Outfall 009, The property ownership has changed to BP Products of North America, which
occupies the same facility and has assumed responsibility for the permitted treatment works.
The change in name and responsibility are correctly identified in the current permit. In April
2008 permission was given to remove the oil/water separators. The facility possesses an updated
permit that has the oil/water separators removed from the water pollution control system. The
new permit also added quarterly ethanol sampling to the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring
Requirements.
The portion of the facility associated with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of containment basins.
The certification classificationfor NCO021971 requires that the facility have all operator
in responsible charge (CRC) with a Grade I Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
(PC-1) certification. The facility is staffed (ORC and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification,
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period November 2007
through October 2008. Self -monitoring records and operator visitation/maintenance logs were
readily available during the inspection. All reviewed records, reports, and logs were clear and
well maintained.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and so water draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are stored in a
I 0,000-gal Ion aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility.
Stormwater surrounding the aboveground storage tanks is collected in containment basins. This
water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for
any sheen. The facility is in the process of adding an ethanol storage tank to the property.
All of the major components of the Outfall 009 treatment works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a
riprap ditch, which discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in

the Catawba River Basin, The receiving water did not appear to be adversely affected by the
facility's effluent.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculationbased on the
amount of drainage area., impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
,ordance with permit requirements.
OPERATIONS TIONS & MAINTENANCE:

1"
{ Michael F. Easley, Uoverno
William C. Ross Jr., Secreta
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1 Coleen H, Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 5, 2007
Mr. R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manger
BP Products North America, Inc.
7401 Cold Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 2214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
BP Te inallTrahsMontaigne WWTP
7401 Cold Mt. Holly Rd
NPDES Permit No. NCO 21971
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Lewis.
On September 25, 2007, Ms. Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Progr (MCWC P) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be. self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report; or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Ms. Marcia Allocco or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
for Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc. Rusty Roelle, MCWQP
Cojh
File: WQ BPTer inal,0021971,0907.dac
APA
NathCarne
olina
NCDEN€t ,1 r tz tills,
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: �s ti° r t 4 ,;tE }c�tsa6 `:.i` -' 6>10 Fast Center Ave„ Suite 301 Mooresville NC; 28115 Fax [phone]i23-674
An Equal OpportunitylAfrmatly Action Employer — 50% Recycled/90% Past Consumer Paper

•
LE
All Mt"tf I R I
r,rA rorynj3ou-i txevisect,3-zip) Frevious h(litions are Obsolete

r
GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on Se
Quality Program (MCWQP), A Compliance
October 14, 2006.
JWCORDS/REPORTS:
t�scharge Monitoring Reports (D Ii
�June2007. Self -monitoring records 4ud*oe
available4ttriniz the �j� �Allrevie e,
ptember 21, 2006 by the Mecklenburg County Water
Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on
n February 10, 2006, and is valid through June 30,
f storm water/wate water from Outfall 009, The
is of North America, which occupies the same
e permitted treatment works. The change in name
he current permit.
with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
in series, with an oil storage tank. The permit
quate for the wastewater being discharged.
0021971 requires that the facility have an operator
Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
RC and back-up) with personnel that possess the
(were reviewed for the period July 2006 through
Va.tor visitation/maintenance logs were readily
records, reports, and logs were clear and well
maintained.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and stormwater draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are stored in a
10,000-gallon aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility.
Storrawater surrounding the aboveground storage tanks is collected in containment basins. This
water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for
any sheen.
All of the major components of the Outlall 009 treatment works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
EFFL.TENT RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a
riprap dit ' ch, which discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in
the Catawba River Basin. The receiving water did not appear to be adversely affected by the
facility's effluent,

c
3
1{
I
'I

° Michael F. Easley, G41
rnor
William G. Russ Jr,, Secretary
North Carolina Department of environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of water Quality
October 14, 2006
Mr. R. Keith Lewis, Terminal Manger
RP Products North America, Inc.
7401 Old Mt. Holly Road
Charlotte, NC 28214
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Bla Te inallTransMontaigne W WTP
7401 Old Mt. Holly Rd.
NPICES Permit No. NCO021 ' 1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Can September 21, 2006, Ms. Olivia Hutchins of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWC, P) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory, however, please
pay particular attention to the highlighted text in the Permit section of the report.
If you have any questions concerning ing this retort or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Ms. Marcia Allocco or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc; Rusty Roelle, MCQ
IRU/oj A
File: WQ BP Terminal.0021971 0906.doc
One C axeilina
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Innternet. r cv° t�cevater caalit .c'C 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]-62 -6748
An Equal opportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Pecycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washingt
AM NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural,
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional C
)or iNrurN rermit iNo. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type Inspector-
NCO021971 06/09/21 C C
Remarks:
In: Dector: Mecklenbu<> Count Water ualitv
tys Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ............
4 N N
V miry i une: Permit Effe
reek 1:00 PM February 10,
Exit Time:
2:00 PM —Pe—rmitExp
Date: June 30, 201
natives ------- Title(s) -------- Phone No(s):
,nsible Official: Title:
Terminal Manager
Phone No.
ne [phone]
knJ rCrTnIL
LKI Flow Measurement LQ Operations & Maintenance ---0
—Sew
Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Ej Sludge Hand] ing/Disposal
El P0111
Facility Site Review
Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program
El Mult
water
Othe
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comment
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See attached sheet(s) ti�o'-r —summary.
Signature(s) of Inspector(s):
Agency/Office/Telephone:
ati
Olivia Hutchins
MCWQP/[phone]
Sept
ignature of Revie "er,
Ic
Agency/Office
Da i
Marcia Allocco
NCDENR-DWQ [phone]
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
, Fhe facility was last inspected on January 24, 2005 by the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on
February 18, 2005.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on February 10, 2006 and is valid through June 30,
2010. This permit authorizes the discharge of storm water/wastewater from Outfall 009. The
property ownership has changed to BP Products of North America, which occupies the same
facility and has assumed responsibility for the permitted treatment works. The change in name
and responsibility are correctly identified in the current pennit.
The portion of the facility associated with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of two oil/water separators, operated in series, with an oil storage tank, The permit
properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the wastewater being discharged.
The certification classification for NCO084549 requires that the facility have Wi operator
in responsible charge (ORC) with a Grade I Physical Chemical Water Pollution Control System
(PC-1) certification. The facility is staffed ((SRC; and back-up) with personnel that possess the
appropriate operator certification.
During the inspection file review process a monitoring requirement discrepancy was
discovered between the permit issued to Transiriontaigne Product Services Inc. on September 23,
2005, and the permit issued to BP Products North America on February 1, 0, 2006. The
discrepancy has been corrected with the issuance o , f a revised permit to BP Products North
America dated September 28, 2006. Please review the monitoring requirements of this
revised permit as they are different from those included in the February 2006 permit. They
now reflect the monitoring requirements as they were listed in the permit issued on September
23, 2005 to Transmontaigne Product Services Inc,
RECORDS/REPORTS.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period July 2005 through
June 2006. Self -monitoring records and operator visitation/maintenance logs were readily
available during the inspection. All reviewed records, reports, and logs were clear and well
maintained.
FACILITYSIT; REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution, Wash -
down water and storm water draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are stored in a
I 0,000-gallon aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility,
Storm water surrounding the aboveground storage tank is collected in containment basins. This
water is held in the containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for a
petroleum sheen,

All of the maior comnonents of tht-. 0iitfh1l (100 IrpntmAinf xvrwl.-� ­_­ ­ ­­_ --A
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
facility's effluent.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation base
amount of drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
location in accordance with permit requirements.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by Accutest (NC Lab Certification #573).
Accutest was not evaluated under this inspection,
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Storm water
in the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prior to discharge.

Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report
PermitNumber:
3 f L�i
Facility:
County:
DMR Month and Year:
The Division of Water Quality deems the aforementioned DMR as incomplete due to the
following reason(s): (Please see highlighted areas on the attached DMR for details)
Ll The written values are illegible
Ll The Average, Maximum, and/or Minimum data points have been omitted
LJ The Units of Measure have been omitted or are incorrect
LJ The DMR Parameter Codes have been omitted
Other:
With regard to parameters 34481 (dissolved Toluene), and 34235 (dissolved Benzene)
which you reported, our database shows the codes should be 34010 (Total Toluene) and
34030 (Total Benzene). Please inform this office if the analytical method used was indeed
what you reported (34481 dissolved Toluene) and (34235 dissolved Benzene) or if the lab
actually analyzed for Total Toluene (340 10) and Total Benzene (34030). If the latter is
correct please update your form template with the correct codes and resubmit per the
enclosed letter.

4 WN A Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
06 �47 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>W-4
Alan W, rdimck,'P x"
Date February 1, 2006
Barbara Castleberry
200 Mansell Ct, East F E B 0 '5 ;9"' 00
Roswell, GA 30076
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NCO021971
Dear Permittee:
T'he purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect ours ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES' permit and 15A NCAC 02B .0506, and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext, 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Michele Phillips
cc:
Central Files
NPO '!�nljxT
An Eqa Oppiftrifty/Affiffn8five Action Employer

a� z
y
pppppp"
i
12
TRmSl,4oNTAIGN INC.
fJ++t+uarv: .i toa r- ,F-7Suppfy,
MAR
Certified Mail Return Receipt „
709 3400 0000 6881 4671 r
March 1 200fiCIA
�;� > . a
Mr. Richard Sridgeman
NC DEN a Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue„ Suite 301
Mooresville NC 2811
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TransMontaigne Southeast Terminal
NP ES Permit NCO021971
Gear Mr. Bridgeman:
We have reviewed the Compliance Evaluation, Inspection report dated February 18 2005, and request a
correction be made under the Facility Site Review section,
Please eliminate all references to the loading rack washdown wafer and stormwater being treated by the
oil/water separators. These waters are not discharged through the oill ater separator but are stared in a
10,000 gallon aboveground storage tank and shipped offsite to a licensed recycling facility.
Please provide` a corrected' Compliance Evaluation Inspection report to me at your earliest convenience.
Should you require additional information, please call me at 770/518-3671.
4Ba
truly yours,
ara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator'
Copy: Terminal Manager
Don griffin
Mr, David Rimer
M. Rusty Roelle
M WQP
70 N. Tryon Street, Suite 20
Charlotte, NC 28202'
Mr. David Rimer
MCWQP
200 Mansell Court Fast : Phone: , (770) 18- 671
Suite 600 Fax: [phone]
Roswell, GA 30076

ppppppp NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualfty
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr; Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
February 18, 2005
s Barbara Castleberry, Environmental Coordinator
TrwWontaigne Terminaling, Inc.
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600
Roswell, Georgia 30076
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TrmtsMontaigne WWTP
Southeast final, 7401 Old Mt. Heady Rd.
DES Permit No. NC O0219"71
Mecklenburg County, NC:
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
On January 24, 2005, Mr. David Rimer of the Mecklenburg County ty Water Quality
Program (MC:WQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County ty d the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed 'report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please deg not
hesitate to call Mr. Bridgeman or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
�D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
Rusty Res ell, MCWQP
DRG/ ,fir
r e: WQ TransMontaigne 0021971,105,NOV
Mooresville Regional Ofte One
10 East Center Avenue, Sine 301, Mooresville, ville, North Carolina 23115 NofthCarohna
Phone: 70 a -1 901 Fax: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr,state,nc.us
Natmally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - Recyc 10 t Consumer Raper

in ApproNT
No2040-
M •
r 1.
t r
ft
r t
I
III
F t
• t«
i
•
•.
! le
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office Date:
EPA Form 3 60-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

The ility ai es to an unnamed tributary to Paw Crwk, which is aClass !C water in
the Catawba River
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flaw measurement,for Outfidl,00 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious at the site, and total rakffll amount.

E
ig permit effluent limits
red at the proper
htamed. Storm water

MWQ
PERMT DEVELOPMENT
NCO021971
MM
1Z
aml
NOM"I MIn
E
80" 56'06" W
Ogr* Terminaling, Inc. Effluent water
tent areas 4utlanksl
i an oil water separator belore being discharged. Loading rack water runs into a storage tank and is
tiled offsite for disposal.
V
;pondence
el burg County Department of Envirom-nental Protection (MCDEP) conducts annual inspections at
3art of a cooperative working agreement between the county and DWQ. Inspection records (2003-2005)
,tory ratings in all inspected areas. The facility has not received any notices of violation or enforcement
ast permit term.
DMRReview:
DMR,s were reviewed from April 2003 through March 2005. Discharges from 009 are sporadic in nature; the
mean flow for those months in which there was discharge was 0.096 MGD. The maximum flow (used below in the
reasonable potential calculations) was 0. 165 MGD. Total suspended solids during this time averaged 5.26 mg/T- with a
maximum of 14.2 mg/L. All oil and grease effluent sample concentrations were less than the detection level.
The permit requires monthly monitoring for BTEX, turbidity, and MTBE. These are addressed below in the
R,PA section. The twice -annual EPA 624/625 scan revealed non -detects for all additional parameters of concern. The
facility has passed all its annual acute toxicity tests since the 2001 permit renewal.
Reasonable Potential Analysis:
Data were analyzed for benzene, xylene, toluene, ethyl benzene and turbidity. All levels for benzene, toluene,
xylene, and ethylbenzene were below detection level. The reasonable potential analysis for turbidity, however,
predicted a maximum effluent turbidity of 95.0 NTU, which is above the state standard of 50 NTU so the limit will
remain unchanged.
Fact Sheet
NPDES 1 CO021971
Renewal
Page I

PERMrMNG STRATEGY
The pennitting strategy for this and all oil terminals in the state is based unon a docurnL-nt entitl
g ,arding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Dawn Jeffries at
DATE: Z9
77
�L% �NTS W45�
DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO021971
Renewal
i Pa.Re 2

O' - W A T Michael F. Easley, Governor
?r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Nortb Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 20, 2005
Barbara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
r
20 Mansell Court East, -QC}
Roswell, Georgia 30076
Subject: Draft NPDES Pe it
Permit NC O021 71
TransMontaigne ProcL Services, Inc.
Charlotte Paw Creek Terminal zal # 2'
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Castleberry.
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft permit for your facility. Please review the draft carefully
to ensure thorough understanding of the conditions and requirements it contains.
The draft permit contains the following significant changes from your current permit -
Monitoring for benzene, toluene, ethy4benzene, and 4ene has been reduced to quarterly date to
lacy of detection for the past two
S 'Ihe EPA Method 625 scan is no longer required.
Monthly monitoring for naphthalene has been added.
Monitoring for MTBE is no longer required
Submit any co erns to me no later than thirty clays following your receipt of the draft. Comments should be
sent to the address listed at the bottom of this page. If no adverse comments are received from the public or
from you, this permit will likelybe issued in September with an effective date of October 1 05:
If you have any questions or comments concerating this draft pennit, contact 'me at the telephone nurnber listed
below.
Sincerely,
nw
u�b
Da wnnJeffri s tr
DES Unit
cc: NPDES "Unit 4. ,
Central piles ,
Aquatac - oxicolt"gy Unit
Mecklenburg County Jep tent of Environtnental Protection
ne
Nh olina
oXwurdll
North Carolina Division of Water (duality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
]ntemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 - FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffi live Acton Employer- 500% flecycledli 00% Post Consumer Paper

'qq!MPermit NCO02I97
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL SOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIN41NATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statue 143- 15.1, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the :Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended,
TransMontaigne Product Services, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the
Charlotte/Paw Greek Ter iial
7401 Old Mount Holly Load
Charlotte
Mecklenburg Count;
to receiving waters designated as'an unnamed tributary to :Paw Creek in the Catawba River 'Basin 'in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1,
II III and IV hereof:
This permit shall become effective
This permit and authorization to discharge small expire at midnight on June 30, 2010.
Signed this clay
DRAFT
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Co scion

Permit NCO 021971
SUPPLEMENT'
S Permits issued to this facility, whether
A41T COVER SHEET
ME issuance, anypreviouny issueu perim uearmg um uLuiiveribuviviz gcrcnmuvc. i11t:1C1V1CjU1t:t:2L,1M1VC
k ority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, temis, and
provisions included herein.
TransMontaligne Product Services, Inc.
is hereby authorized to:
ontinue to operate the existing water pollution control system consisting of.
Oil/water separation
Containment basins
acility is located at the Charlotte/Paw Creek Terminal #2 at 7401 Old Mount Holly Road near
of in Mecklenburg County, and
2. Discharge storinwater from said treatment facility through Outtall 009 at a specified location (see
attached map) into an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, a waterbody classified as C waters within the
Catawba River Basin.

MEW
COM
ylene !2uarterly Grab Effluent
Monthly Grab Effluent
Acute Toxici!Y-! Annually Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
I . Flow — During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report
(DMR) indicating "No discharge." Flow must be measured with each discharge event and may be
monitored in one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall; exclude built -upon
area (best method for facilities with large runoff -collection ponds);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
2. Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
3. Turbidity — Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 U. If receiving stream
background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to increase.
4. Naphthalene — Monitoring requirement applies to >facilities that store, or historically stored, diesel or
other heavy fuels on site.
5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(2.)]. Permit holder shall
sample for acute toxicity and BTEX concurrently.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace aniounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank (or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene
concentration is less than 71.4 jtg/l and toluene concentration is less than I I jig/L

For V Permit NCO021971
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (2.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The Permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document
EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
24-hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste
treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of
the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and
reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Enviromnental Sciences Branch no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
to "C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality <
" March 16, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL° iE
RETURN RCEiPT REQUESTED���
—AL OFFICE
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
TransMontaigne Product Services, Inc..
200 Mansell Ct. E
Roswell, GA 30076
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Effluent Toxicity Testing
NPDES Permit No. NCO021971 /009
Charlotte/ Paw Creek Terminal ##2 r
Mecklenburg County WATER, j
Dear Ms. Castlebury:
The reporting of toxicity self -monitoring data is a dual requiredr
DMR and the AT Reporting Form must be submitted to: DWQ/ESS, 1621
within the required time frame;
You are requested to submit the May 2004 toxicity-self-monitoi
15. Failure to submit the report form by this date will result in issuance c
4i 1.N-i... 4 •,
ved your toxicity self -monitoring
trative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter
ied no later than 30 days after the end
SIR) indicates that a toxicity test was
e Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test Form
ty test results must be entered on your
c Center, Raleigh NC 27699-161
Chief, Environmental Sciences Section
cc: ffice
ohn Lesley-.4ohevi44o Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Files
Central Files
No"e tCarolina
Itur lltf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.esn.enr.state.nc.us 4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Past Consumer Paper

Toxicity te
➢ Shot
imm
guar
➢ If yc
must
mon
➢ If yc
ovided in an effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testin,
ase take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include all the to:
uirements contained in Your NPDES permit. If you should have any questions about your tox
contact Mr. Kevin Bowden with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] or another
umber.
for ensuring that toxicity testing is conducted according to the permit requirement and that toxicity i
I.
arameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
IN ADDITION
lata (original "AT" form) must be submitted to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
results shall be flied with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting
Lnuary test result is due by the end of February).
condition language contained in your NPDES permit may require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon
itb in which toxicity monitoring is required,
;sed. Upon passing this monthly test requirt
z that your permit may or may not contain th
I to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs,
-at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe
report. You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the form and

\NA Michael F. Easley
Q Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
T- NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
September 9, 2004
Dr. Barbara Castleberry
TransMontaigne Product Services Inc
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600
Roswell, GA 30076
Subject. Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC1)021971
Charlotte/Paw Creek Terminal # 2
Mecklenburg County
Dear Permittee:
Your NPDES permit expires on June 30,2005. Federal (40 CFR 122.41) and North Carolina (15ANCAC 2110105(e))
regulations require that pernut renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. If
you have already mailed your renewal application, you may disregard this notice.
To satisfy this requirement, your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than January 1,
2005. Failure to request renewal by this date may result in a civil assessment of at least $500.00. Larger penalties may be assessed
depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after June 30, 2005, the current permit must be renewed. Discharge of wastewater
without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1; unperinitted discharges of wastewater may be
assessed civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact me at the telephone
number or address listed below. You may also contact the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] to begin the rescission
process.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must submit with
the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me at the telephone number or e-mail address listed
below.
Sincerely,
Charles It Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit ","ML OFFICE
cc: Central Files
W"I"00,44 SEP 1 4 2004
NPDES File
a
,J h1r'
iSKTION
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919733-5083, extension 511 ,
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o,enrstate.nc.usINPDES e-mail: charles.weavertiIncmail,net

water, fitterhackwash , etc.)
PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR / Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

t
TRANsMoNTAIGNEINC. ;
#)ufeusn`rg P1nck.o Fret 5�,p7y, v a iJ.u+anwi 3
Via Overnight Mail E E
July 7, 2004
JUL 0 8 2004
Mr. Richard Bridgeman
NC DENR - Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional OfficeRESOURCES
919 North Main Street 11
1%V,,fit. 0 F FICE
Mooresville NC 2811
Notice of Violation
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TransMontaigne Southeast Terminal
N DES Permit NCO 21971
Gear Mr. Bridgeman.
In compliance with the Notice of Violation dated June 22, 2004, listed below is the response to the
deficiencies noted under the Self Monitoring Program .
The facility had effluent discharges on December 16, 2003 and December 29, 2003. Terminal personnel did
not perform effluent sampling on the December 18t" discharge because it was believed that additional
discharges would occur and collection would be performed later in the month.
The effluent discharge on December 29 2003 was not collected due to clean up activities resulting from the
minor spill that occurred on December 1, 2003.
1E
er
nc
ure compliance with the NPDES permit monitoring frequency requirements.
trust the corrective action listed above will provide assurance that future deficiencies of this nature will
occur.
Fuld you require additional information, please call me at 770/518-3571.

A 7 ,- Michael E. ey, Governor
P0
+' Williamfix, Jr., Secreftry
*, North Carolina Department of`En ' srsent Natural Resources
t"" Alan . Klimek, P. E. Diredor
Division of Water Quality
Coleeu H. SullinsDeputy Director
Division of Water Quality
ur1G' ,
CE&TIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE STED
Ms. Barbara Castleberry, Enviromnental Coordinator
TransMontaipe "Terminating, Inc.
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600
Roswell, Georgia 30076
SUBJECT: NOTICE :E OF VIOLATION
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TransMontaigne WWTP
Southeast Terminal, 7401 Old Mt. Molly Rd:
DES Permit No. NCO0219' I
Mecklenburg County, SIC
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
On May 28, 2004, Mr. David 'Rimer of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This inspection was conducted as part of
cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of Water Quality. The
enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued. as a :Notre of Violation because of the findings noted under the Self -
Monitoring Program heading of the enclosed report. It is requested that a written response, which
addresses the noted deficiency, be submitted to this {office by no inter than July 93 202 4. Please direct
your response to Mr. Richard Bridgeman of this Office. Additionally, please send a copy of this response
to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of MCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, N. C. 28202.
If you have any 'questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to
call Mr. Bridgeman or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
e
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
c: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
DRG/d r -
File: WQ TmnsMomaipe 0021971. t14,NO
Ahmc=2
livision of W ty. �i lle Reps 919 Al Ste lei ille A3C 11 S {704) 6 3-1f+99 o S
1-b7nEi36}R

ME
TransMon aigne % WT1' 1.30 PM September 1, 2001
Southeast Terminal Exit Time:
7401 Old Mt. Holly Rd. 2.20 PM Permit Expiration Date:
Mecklenburg County, NC Date: June 30, 200
March 28, 2004
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives-------Titl (s)----]Phone No(s)
Mr. Keith Lewis, ORC, [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title:
Ms Barbara Castleberry Environmental Coordinator
TransMontaigne ,
200 Mansell Court Past, Suite 600 Phone 8-3 Contacted?
Roswell. Georgia 3007fi (770)51 -3671 No
❑ Pollution Prevention
0 Multimedia
Date:
June 3, 2004
Date:

rpr
GENE
The facility was last inspected on March 20, 2003 by the Mecklenburg County ty Water
Quality Program (MCVd`QP. A Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on April
15, 003.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and is valid through. June 30,
2005. The permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater/wastewater from Outfall 009.
The portion of the facility associated with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of two oil/water separators, operated in series, with'an oil storage tank. The permit
properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the wastewater being discharged.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (D were reviewed for the period May 2003 through
April 2004. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
The terminal manager maintains clear, organized records and reports. copies of effluent
analytical results are readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITEREVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, d kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and storrawater draining g from the leading racy and manifold areas are treated by the
oil/water separators. The loading rack is covered by a roof, which reduces the volume of
rainwater going to the oil/water separators, following treatment ent the discharge enters an open
ditch that flows toward Outta l 009. Additional stormwater from the area is collected in the
containment basins surrounding the above ground storage tanks. water is held in the
containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for any sheen. The
drainages from both areas merge together prior to Outfall 009.
All of the major components of the Outfall 009 treatment :works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in
the Catawba River Basin;
FLOW SU ENT
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount ofdrainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
LABORATORY: _
Analysis of effluent samples its performed by Test America. Test America was not
evaluated under this inspection.

rpv
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging t the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a
riprap ditch, which flaws to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, classified as C waters within the
Catawba River Basin.
Inspection oft e outfa.11 revealed no detrimental impacts to the receiving stream.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (D ) were reviewed for the period May 2003 through
April 2004. The following monitoring frequency requirements violations were noted:
. Effluent Turbidity was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation of
permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Turbidity.
2. Effluent Total Suspended Residue (TSR) was not collected during the month of
December 2003 in violation of permit monitoring frequency requirements. This
constitutes one (1) failure to monitor effluent Total. Suspended Residue.
. Effluent Oil and Grease (O&&G) was not collected during the month of December 2003 in
violation of permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (l) failure to
monitor effluent Oil and (Grease.
4. Effluent Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was not collected during the month of
December 2003 in violation of permit monitoring frequency requirements. This
constitutes one () failure to monitor effluent Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether.
. Effluent Benzene was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation of
permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Benzene.
o. Effluent Toluene was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation of
permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Toluene.
7. Effluent Xylene was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation o
permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Xylene.
. Effluent Ethylbenzene was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation
of permit monitoring frequency requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Ethylbenzene.
Rating: Unsatisfactory
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Storm water
in the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prier to discharge.

Ms. Castleberry:
On May 28, 2004, Mr. David Rimer of the
your response to Mr. Richard Bridgeman of this Office. Additionally, please send a copy of this response
to Mr. Rusty Rozzelle of MCWQP at 700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205, Charlotte, N. C. 28202.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not hesitate to
call Mr. Bridgernan or me at this Office.
Enclosure Water Quality Regional Supervisor
ZL
Aa
NvoliCarolma

United States Enviromnental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
Form Approved
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report OMB No. 2040-0003
I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Approval Expires
Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office NCDENR 7/31/85
Section Ai National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES Permit No. YR/MO/DAY Inspection Type
Inspector Facility Type
N 5 NCO021971 04/05/28 C
C 2
Remarks:
Inspector: Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Mionitoring Evaluation Rating Ill QA
........... Reserved ............
.8 3 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected: Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
TransMontaigne WWTP 1:30 PM
September t, 2001
Southeast Tenninal Exit Time:
7401 Old Mt. Holly Rd. 2:20 PM
Permit Expiration Date -
Mecklenburg County, NC Date:
June 30, 2005
March 28, 2004
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives --Title(s)-Phone No(s):
Mr. Keith Lewis, ORC, [phone]
Name and Address of Responsible Official: Title:
Ms. Barbara Castleberry Environmental Coordinator
TransMontaigne Phone No.
Contacted?
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600 (7-10)518--)671
No
Roswell, Georgia 30076
Section C:
Areas Evaluate d Durine Inspection
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance
0 ewer Overflow
RecordsiReports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling/Disposal
0 Pollution Prevention
Z Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules Pretreatment Program
0 Multimedia
El Stormwater
El Other:
Sectioti D: Summary of Findings/ConimenO
C" n�;'n
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See attached shect(s) for summary.
Signature(s) of Inspector(s): Agency/Office/Telephone:
Date:
David MCWQP/[phone]
June 3, 2004
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office
Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on March 20, 2003 by the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program (MCWQP). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on April
15,2003.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and is valid through June 30,
2005. The permit authorizes the discharge of stormwater/wastewater from Outtall 009.
The portion of the facility associated with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of two oll/water separators, operated in series, with an oil storage tank. The permit
properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the wastewater being discharged.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were reviewed for the period May 2003 through
April 2004. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
The terminal manager maintains clear, organized records and reports. Copies of effluent
analytical results are readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and stormwater draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are treated by the
oil/water separators. The loading rack is covered by a roo� which reduces the volume of
rainwater going to the oil/water separators, Following treatment the discharge enters an open
ditch that flows toward Outfall 009. Additional storrawater from the area is collected in the
containment basins surrounding the above ground storage tanks. This water is held in the
containment basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for any sheen. The
drainages from both areas merge together prior to Outfall 009.
All of the major components of the Outfall 009 treatment works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspectiom
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in
the Catawba River Basin.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfill 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by Test America. Test America was not
evaluated under this inspection.

EFFLUENT/RECEIVING RYA
e facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a
riprap ditch, which flaws to an unnamedtributary to Paw Creek, classified as C watery within the
Catawba River Basin.
Inspection oft e out all revealed no detrimental impacts to the receiving stream.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
Discharge Monitoring Reports (D ) were reviewed for the period May 2003 through
April 2004. The following monitoring frequency requirements violations were noted.:
1. Effluent Turbidity was not collected during the month of December 2003 in violation of
permit monitoring frequency .requirements. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor
effluent Turbidity.
2. Effluent Total Suspended Residue (TSR) was not collected during the month o
December 2003 in violation ofpermit monitoring frequency requirements. This
constitutes one (l) failure to monitor effluent "Total Suspended Residue.
3. Effluent Coil and Grease (O G) was not collected during the month of December 2003 in
violations of p
monitor efflu
4. Effluent .Met]
December 2
constitutes of
�ht Benzene.
ene.
8. Effluent Ethylbenzene was not collected during the month of December 2003 in, of tion
of permit monitoringfrequency requirements. This constitutesone (1) failure to monitor
effluent Ethylbenzene.
. g* Unsa ` factory
OPERATIONS &MAINTENANCE:
e facility appeared to be well operated d the site properly maintained. Storm water
in the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheensprior to discharge.
e.

North Carolina Department of Environm
Ala
April 15, 2003
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
TransMontaigne Terminaling, Inc.
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600
Roswell, Georgia 30076
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TransMontaigne WWTP
Southeast Terminal, 7401 Old Mt. lolly Rd.
NPDES Permit No. NC 021 71
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
On March 20, 2003, Mr. David Rimer of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCW P) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. yhi inspection#. was
-.--.5_:. s.a�--1 -- ,,.--+ € Pn ,. rta.rsr sticrta A-.,^trt-;n 5` +:earF*,-mPnt it., P.en Mecklenburg L.., e ount d the
ter Quality. The enclosea report s outa cue Sell-eXpl• ULOV .
ave any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
qr. Bridgeman or me at this Office.
Sincerely,
9 ►`t - ,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc. Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
djr
File: Wt TransMontaipe 0021971.303.doe
Z
N1
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE (704) 6e--1699 Customer!
FAX (04) ;&, ,,,,_ 04tJ 1 800 623M

y�
t
3 lY N
oring Program Q Slu j
e Schedules Prtr{
Signs e(s) of pector(s): Age
David Rimer MC
Signature of Reviewer: Age
EPA Form 35 0- (Revised 3'-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete
-5500 Marc

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on December 18, 2001 by Mr. D. Will Autry of the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program (MC C P). A Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Report was issued on January 15, 2002.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and is valid through'June 30,
2005. The permit authorizes the discharge of stet waterwastewater from Outfall 009.
The portion of the facility associated with the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of o oil/water separators, operated in series, with an oil storage tar& The permit
properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the wastewater being discharged.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Deports were reviewed for the period February 2002
through January u 2003. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
The terminal manager maintains clear, organized records and reports. No discrepancies
were noted.. Copies of effluent analytical results are readily available at the site.
FACILITY SITE `:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution. Wash -
down water and stormwater draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are treated by the
oing to the oil water separators. Following treatment the discharge enters an open
ows toward Outfall 009. Additional stormwater from the area is collected in the
I basins surrounding the above ground storage tanks. This water is held in the
I basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for any she e
~orn bath areas merge together prior to Outfall 009.
iajorcomponents of the Outfall 009 treatment works were in service and
rating properly at the time of the inspection.
�.aA�„,,discharges to ' ed tribut to Paw Creelf, which is a Class C water `
the Catawba River Basin.

FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by Test America. Test America was not
evaluated under this inspection.
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. Outfall 009 consists of a
riprap ditch, which flows to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, a Class C water in the Catawba
River Basin.
Inspection of the outfall revealed no detrimental impacts to the receiving stream.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period February 2002 through January 2003. The reports
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements
during this period.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Storm water
in the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prior to discharge.

I RAN hits:
DrrtlumFrau NODR
A—,kax Fart Soppty, orr tiema 1 ;:,•
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
7099 3400 0009 fr 82 8876
February 20 2003
Attention: Central Files;
Division of Water Quality A. � �
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1 17
TRANSMONTAIGNE TERMINALING INC.
CHARLOTTE TERMINAL
NPD S PERMIT NO. NCO021971
To Whom It May Concern.
In compliance with the referenced NPDES Permit, we report the following noncompliance event on
Outfall 009 at the (charlotte facility.
Laboratory results received for the February 11, 203 discharge on turbidity were 58.2 NTU. The
daily maximum discharge limitation for Turbidity is 50 l' TU.
No operational activity occurred to cause the exceedance, We suspect the eceedance is attributed
to the discharge being sampled during a very light rain event of 1/8" that also included snow and
ice meltdown.
Terminal personnel continue to apply best management practices at the facility.
If you have any questions, please call me at 770/518-3671.
Si cerely,t
1
Barbara Castleberry
Enviro ental Coordinator
copy; Keith Lewis
Ikon Griffin
Dudley Tarlton
State of North Carolina/
DEHNR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC ;2811
200 Mansell Court East Phone: [phone] Mailing Address:
Suite 600 Fax: [phone] P.O. Box 10307E
Roswell, GA 30076 Roswell, GA 30076

im Receipt Requested
830114
DEcEmBER 10, 2002
Attention: Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleieh. NC 2769 -1617
AIGNE TERMINALING INC.
TERMINAL
IT NO. NCO021971
y Concern:
:
tleberry
tal Coordinator
DEHNR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
200 Mansell Court East Phone: [phone]
Suite 600 Fax: [phone]
Roswell, GA 30076
8-3671,
? Mailing ,Address:
5 ' P.Q. Box 103076
Roswell, GA 30076

VAe
IPPFPPI r V.. ° Michael F. ley ,..
Ir' Govem ar
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
t North Carolina Department aof Environment and Natural Resources
pGregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
January 15, 2002
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
TransMontaigne
200 Mansell Court East, Suite 600
Roswell, Georgia 30076
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
TransMontaigne WW "P
Southeast Terminal, 7401 told hilt. dolly Rd.
NPDES Permit No. NCO021971
Mecklenburg County, N
Bear Ms, Castleberry;
On December 18, 200 1, Mr. D. Will Autry of the Mecklenburg County Department of
Environmental Protection (M "DEP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This
inspection was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg
County and the Division of "Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report or any other matters, please do not
hesitate to call Mr. BridgeBridgeman or me at this {office.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc. ' Rusty Rozzelle, MCDEP
DWA
File:- WQ TransMontaigne 0021571.doc
imm
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

I
I Narni- ant]
States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 21
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
h Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Code NPDES Permit No. YRIMO/DAY Inspection Type
Inspector Facility Type
5 NCO021971 01/12/18 C
C 2
Remarks:
Inseector: MecklenbuKa Coun!j Environmental Protection
Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Ill QA
........... Reserved ............
3 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Entry Time:
Permit Effective Date:
)n of Facility Inspected:
2:00 PM
September 1, 2001
rWTP
Exit Time:
1
2:40 PM
Permit Expiration Date:
y Rd�
Date:
June 30, 2005
ity, NC
December 18,2001
te Representatives ---Title(s)---Phone No(s):
)RC, [phone]
is of Responsible Official:
Title:
tbeM,
Environmental Coordinator
East, Suite 600
Phone No.
Contacted?
�'0076
[phone]
Yes
Section C:
Areas Evaluated During Inspection
Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance
Sewer Overflow
.s Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling/Disposal
Pollution Prevention
:view Compliance Schedules Pretreatment 'Program
Multimedia
,inp Stormwater
Waters Laboratoa
Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
All areas are rated satisfactory unless otherwise indicated. See attached sheet(s) for summary.
Signature's' 0 -Agency/Office/Telephone: Date:
D. Will Autry MCDEP/[phone] December 28,2001
Signature of Reviewer: Agency/Office Date:
EPA Form 3560-3 (Revised 3-85) Previous Editions are Obsolete

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected pected April 11 001 by Mr. Derrick Harris s of the
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection (MCI EP). A Notice of
Violation/Compliance Evaluation Inspection. Report was issued: on April 24, 2001.
PERMIT:
The facility operated under the previous pennit until August 31, 2001. The current
permit became effective on September 1, 2001 and is valid through June 30, 2005. The ;permit
authorizes the discharge of stormwater/wastewater from Outfall 009.
The portion of the facility associated with.. the NPDES treatment works and discharge
consists of two oil/water separators, operated in series, with an oil storage tank. The pen -nit
properly describes the facility and appears adequate for the wastewater being discharged.
RECORDS/REPORTS:
Discharge Monitoring Deports DMRs were reviewed for the period December 2000
through November 2001. These reports appeared to be properly completed.
The terminal manager maintains char, organized records and reports. No discrepancies
were noted. Copies of effluent analytical results are readily mailable at the site.
FACILITY SITE VIE
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, d kerosene storage and distribution.. Wash -
down water and stormwater draining from the loading rack and manifold areas are treated by the
oil/water separators. The loading rack is covered by a roof which reduces the volume of
rainwater ater going to the oil/water separators. Following treatment the discharge enters an open
ditch that flows toward Cyutfall 009. Additional stormwater from the area is collected in the
contaimnent basins surrounding the above ground storage tanks. This water is held in the
contaimnent basins until it is manually released after a visual inspection for any sheen. The
drainages from bath areas merge together prior to Outfall 009.
All of the major components of the Out all 009 treatment works were in service and
appeared to be operating properly at the time of the inspection.
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, which is a glass C water in
the Catawba River Basin.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
NT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a. calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious ea at the site, and total rainfall amount.
LABORATORY:
Analysis of effluent samples is performed by Test America. Test America was not
evaluated under this inspection.

-,4,44
2001:
1. Effluent Flow was not monitored for the month of February 200 1, in vio
I'm 111INJAUVW1 I IWVV.
2. Effluent Total Suspended Solids (TSS) was not monitored for the month of
February 200 1, in violation of the permit monthly monitoring frequency
requirement. This constitutes one (1) failure to monitor Effluent TSS,
3. Effluent Oil and Grease (0 & G) was not monitored for the month of February
2001, in violation of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement, This
constitutes one (1) failure to monitor Effluent 0 & G.
4. Effluent Benzene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in violation
of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This constitutes one (1)
failure to monitor Effluent Benzene.
5. Effluent Toluene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in violation
of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This constitutes one (1)
failure to monitor Effluent Toluene.
6� Effluent Ethyl Benzene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in
violation of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This
constitutes one (1) failure to monitor Effluent Ethyl Benzene.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly maintained. Storm water in the
diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleum sheens prior to discharge.

1IRMSMONTAIGM INC.
Nfi-Mg A S�ppt�� . vw-d
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
7099 3400 0009 6879 7875
May 1, 2001
Mr. Richard Bridgeman
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Notice of Violation
TransMontaigne Terminating Inc.
NPDES Permit NCO021971
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Bridgeman:
In compliance with the Notice of Violation issued April 24, 200 1, TransMontaigne makes written notification to the deficiencies
noted under the Self -Monitoring Program.
On February 28, 2001, terminal personnel monitored the facility effluent flow for the annual acute t0XiCity requirement, however,
they failed to perform the required monthly monitoring of all permitted parameters. Because the discharge occurred on the last
day of the mouth, no other discharge occurred during February to enable terminal personnel to perform all required monitoring.
Terminal personnel have been counseled as to the importance of complying with all permit conditions and will verify that all
required parameters are properly monitored each month during discharge.
We trust the cotTective action listed above will provide assurance that future deficiencies of this nature will not occur,
TransMontaigne also makes notification to NCDENR that the build up of mud referenced in the Effluent/Receiving Waters section
of the inspection report was not a result of the cleaning out of gasoline storage tanks, A discharge of approximately 80,000 barrels
of hydrostatic test water from an out of service aboveground storage tank was completed on April 10, 2001. The storage tank
(which previously contained kerosene and had been cleaned before testing began), contained clean water obtained from the firTek
Av\
hydrant located near the facility property. The discharge was performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
NPDES permit.
Should you require additional information, please call me at 770/518-3671.
V truly yours, AA-V
�-Bf�ba� Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator Gel
Copy: Rusty Rozzelle, 7099 3400 0009 6879 7882
Mecklenburg Department of Environmental Protection
700 N. Tryon Street, Suite 205
Charlotte, NC 28202
Don Griffin
Keith Lewis
Dudley Tarlton
Doug Hall
200 Mansell Court East Phone: [phone] Mailing Address:
Suite 600 Fax: [phone] P.O. Box 103076
Roswell, GA 30076 Roswell, GA 30076

E DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMY
NPDES No. NCO02I�
��� �rr+rrrrrr�rr�
EVELOPMENT
i
ling Inc./Paw Creek
7o urt, Suite oswe ,
28214
w2 5�
z
° Lat. 36' 16' 37" N Long. 0' 56'0 "w
100
ly is one of two in the Paw Creek area owned by Transmontaigne Termin
Eased from Louis Dreyfus Energy in April 1999. Effluent water discharged
Loading rack water is run through an oil water separator. This water
;ins (where it combines with stormwater) and is released from these has
ondence
krndence files from 1998-2000 were reviewed. During this time period, t
tent of Enviromnental Protection (MCDEP) performed three inspections (Oil
c-Nlyy been in compliance during these inspections. In Ma 1999, shortly aft
ity received a marginal rating in two categories o the compliance
rid self -monitoring program. Flaw was being measured improperly and the 1
t the facility received a satisfactory rating frot
solids (T ) and' non -detects for the volatiles and semi-vol tiles detectable by the EPA 624/625 sc _ .i No
OVs were found in the file.
D R. Review.
DMR.s were reviewed from January 1997 through January 2001. Discharges from 09 are sporadic in
nature, the mean flow for those months in which there was discharge was 0.219 MG9. The maximum flow
(used below in the reasonable potential calculations) was 0.8 MGD. Total suspended solids during this time
averaged 21.9 mg/L with a maximum of 326 mg/L. The average oil and grease concentration was 1.56 mg/L
with a maximum concentration of 10.5 mg/L.
The twice' annual EPA 624/625 scan revealed non -detects for all the semi-volatiles and volatiles tested.
The facility is currently required to test monthly for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene — for the entire
permitting cycle, there were five or fewer detects of each. The facility has passed its acute toxicity test since
1997.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO0219 i
Renewal
Page 1

Since March 1999, the facility has been required to sam e for turbidity quarterly as per an EPA
directive. They have sampled durin 1 each discharae event sin( Ve requirement was instilled — the average
turbidity value in the past year and a Ulf is 12.39 MfU and the maximum was 28.2 NTU.
Reasonable Potential Analysis:
Reasonable Potential Analysis was run for benzene, xylene, toluene, ethyl benzene and turbidity. With
few detects for the BTEX contaminants, not one of these four demonstrated reasonable potential for effluent
contamination. The reasonable potential analysis for turbidit however, predicted a maximum effluent
turbidity of 92.2 NTU, which is above the state standard of 50 N70.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
The permitting strategy for this and all oil terminals in the state is based upon a 2001 NPDES
document entitled, "Permit Requirements for Discharges from Oil and Petroleum Storage Facilities." This
document is based upon a 1996 SOP and has been updated after a data review and internal discussions. It
delineates monitoring frequencies and permitting limits for contaminants commonly found at these sites.
Below, it is referred to as the " 2001 SOP."
Waste Load Allocation (WLA).
The last waste load allocation was performed in 1994. The facility was not only under different
ownership, but also discharging from eight separate outfalls. This WLA indicates that the region requested
that benzene and toluene limits be assigned the permit. It also expresses concern over historical turbidity
problems on the site.
Oil Terminal SOP:
The flow, toxicity, TSS, and oil and grease requirements specified in the previous permit and the 2001
SOP (Parts I.A. — I.D.) remain unchanged. The previous permit limited benzene to 71.4 lig/L, toluene to 11 �O
ug/L and ethyl benzene to 325.0 pig/L. The facility has since adequately demonstrated that these parameters
are not a cause for concern. These limits will therefore be removed but the facility will still be required to
monitor monthly for the BTEX parameters as per Part I.E. of the SOP. Since the DMRs indicated non -detects
in the reporting of EPA Methods 624/625, this requirement will be removed as per Part II.A. of the SOP.
Naphthalene and MTBE monthly monitoring will be added to the permit as per Parts I.F and 1.1 of the 2001
SOP. As per parts I.G. and I.H. of the 2001 SOP, there can be no direct discharge of tanks solids, tank bottom
water or the rag layer, and no direct discharge of hydrostatic test water if concentrations of benzene and/or
toluene exceed the water quality standard. Part II.C. lists a requirement specific to the Paw Creek terminals —
turbidity monitoring as mandated by the EPA. After performing a RPA for turbidity, it has been determined
that a turbidity limit of 50 NTU will be placed in the pennit and the frequency of turbidity monitoring will be
monthly.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
• Removal of benzene, toTuene, ethyl benzene and xylene limits
• Removal of EPA Methods 624/625 monitoring requirement
• Addition of naphthalene monitoring
• Addition of MTBE monitoring
• Addition of quarterly turbidity monitoring
• Addition of turbidity limit of 50 NTU
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public NjfiE�: March 14, 2001
Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 27, 2001
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Natalie
Sierra at [phone] ext, 55 1.
NAME: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO021971
Renewal
Page 2

IONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
IE: DATE:
DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO021971
Renewal
Page 3

')NA7*k Michael F. Easley
Governor
0 C EPt William G.'Ross,Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
t KerrT. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
March 14, 2001
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
rransMontaigne Tenninaling, Inc.
200Mansell Court East - Smite 600
Roswell, Georgia: 30076-4853
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NCO021971
Charlotte/Paw Creek Terminal #2
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
'JU E:V .4 GXdE.. XV 6AA44U ..BAsl Ldd4:4.AAUA U4A ,Ad WAAALLLd tF tGAAALAdAd ..- a«A-- da,ds:.a
rnd requirements contained therein.
• •
. r r r • r-- .•••• r r• r-
• •- r' • - - r • r• .
r • • r .• r r. s
r • •r ••- r_ -r r - r
r r
i • * - M .i . * * . is

Please submit any come
days following receipt of this l(
Ms. Natalie Sierra
NC13ENR - DWQ -NPDE
121 Mail Service Cent(
Raleigh, North Carolina
If you have any questioi
919-733- 083 extension 551 o
cc: MooresvilleRegional Office
NPDES Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mecklenburg County Dep
rch 1999. Reasonable potential analysis
99-1617
/Water Quality Section
artment of Environmental Protection.

Permit NC 0219 ' 1
s STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF IRON E N'
DIVISION OF WA
PERM
TO DISCHARGE WASTE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT'DISCW
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Control Act, a
TransMontaligne'
is hereby authorized to dischg6-was
arot'w\r
76MI'l
ChArl
ec en u
•
`TER UNDER THE
P,GE ELIMINATION, SYSTEM
[8e.3,'Gli Gilk,,i✓V111Y111:pJiL911t 1Lt. aitGi'1 Gt&Gt At xX a6Ga i 4itttd4tvta
ends a S3l�.+'`
lath •
atef from out"tills located at the
µ''erina
monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV,
shah become effective September 1, 2001.
Signed this day
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC 021971
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
TransMonta19
ne 'Ter mailing, Inc.
is hereby authorized to.
1 continue to operate the existing water pollution control syst insist*ing ID
• oil/water separation
• containment basins
located at the Charlotte/Paw Charlotte/PawCreek Terminal #2 t 74Ol t l l tr i t �i Road near Charlotte in
Mecklenburg County, and', `
2. discharge stormwater and loading rack wash water from said treatment facility through Outfall tits
at a specified location (see attached map) into an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, a waterbody
classified as C waters within the Catawba RiverBasin.

Permit NCO0; 19"71
relow:�
ttnyt iiezen 1vtciitii °'ce+ auxxauc"aa
}z ene --Ur
p t a ene tint y ra cent
of 1 > ra uent
b ' on � r------Effluent
Acute Toxicity k nnua y luent
Footnotes:
e
ow —During periods of no flc ,the Penn' iii submit a monthly Disbarcnitcarn� R rt
(D ) indicating ""No discharge."" . ow may bpmomt red in one of four ways.
IV
a) measure flow continuously
b) calculate flow based on total raiper,,a`rea draining to the outfll} exclude built -upon
area (best method for facilities with
I 'rge' unvff collection ponds);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals du n g the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pup logs.
2.Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of quiescent (calm water) zone.
3. Turbidity -:Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to; exceed 50 NTU. If receiving stream
background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to increase.
4, pH shall not fall below 6.0 nor exceed 9.0 standard units.
5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition .A.( .)].
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in tither than trace amounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge o (carpipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene
concentration is less than'1.4 lig/1 and toluene concentration is less than I I ll.

opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.

REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
� Wn
N r ` ?ATE. ;
SUPERVISOR:
Fact "sheet
NPDES N O021971
Renewal
'age 3

4L),A- I KfVI(S
ichael F. Easley
P P, P 70'�o Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
Ac) La
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Oualfty
April 24, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQ ESTED
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
TransMontaigne
200 Mansell Court, East
Suite 600
Roswell, Georgia 30076
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Compliance Evaluation lnspection
TransMontaigne
Southeast Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO021971
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
On April 11, 2001, Mr. Derrick A. Harris of the Mecklenburg County Department of
Environmental Protection (MCDEP) conducted an inspection at the subject facility. This
;"ov-t,-Pftn1r%xxTnc r-nintim-tPA n(z nnri- nf n nnnnerntivi-, workincr avreement between Mecklenburg
conditions, or requirements of any permit required by G.S. 143-215.1. Should this Office make
an enforcement recommendation relative to the violations. you will be advised in writin
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 8W 623-7748 FAX [phone]D40

Sincerely,
-W* � -" .'
Water Quality to
File; WQ 0021971 A01
[ease do not

Transaction Code NPDES No. Yr/liii
N 5 NCO021971 01/04,
Inspector, Mecklenburg Court
Inspection Work Days Facility Evaluation Rating
0.5 3
Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
C C 2
krks:
artment, of Environmental Protection
QA... . ..... Reserved__.
N
Permit Expiration ate:
0
Titl�6:7 "nwronmentsitoonJinator
�on
ct
�k&niyofli"Iephooe No-
MCD8P I Charlotte [phone]
April 18, 2001
frice/Phorie & Fax No-

GENERAL:
The facility was last inspected on June 21, 2000 by Mr. John McCulloch of the
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). A Compliance
Evaluation Inspection Report was issued on July 12, 2000.
PERMIT:
The current permit became effective on September 1, 1996 and expires on August 3 1,
,I*
I 1 9
FACILITY SITE REVIEW:
The facility is engaged in fuel oil, gasoline, and kerosene storage and distribution.
The facility discharges to an unnamed tributary Paw Creek, which is a Class C water in the
Catawba River Basin.
FLOW MEASUREMENT:
Flow measurement for Outfall 009 is accomplished by using a calculation based on the
amount of drainage area, impervious area at the site, and total rainfall amount. This method of
flow measurement is acceptable.
LABORATORY:
J'1111TZIA;4 W4b 11UL fZVd1U4LrU UHUU1 U11b 111SPUQU011.

PPIPPP,"-
EFFLUENT/RECEIVING WATERS:
The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection. (utfall 009 consists of
rip rap ditch which flows to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, a Class C water in the Catawba
River Basin.
There was a red mud or silt deposit on the rocks that form the rip rap channel and also on
the bed of the creek at outfall 009. Because of dry weather, no impact was observed downstream
of outfall 009. The ORC indicated that the build up of mud was a result of the cleaning out of
some of the gasoline storage `tanks. Sample analysis of the wastewater from the tank cleaning
process were provided. The analysis did not indicate any elevated pollutant levels.
SELF -MONITORING PROGRAM:
DMRs were reviewed for the period .April 2000 through February 2001. The reports
indicate that the facility was in compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements ;
during this period, except for the following:
1. Effluent Flow was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in violation of
the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This constitutes one (1)
failure to monitor effluent Flow.
1 Effluent Total Suspended Solids;(TSS) was not monitored for the month of
February 2001, in violation of the permit monthly monitoring frequency
requirement. This constitutes one (1) failure to onitor effluent TSS.
. Effluent Coil and Grease (O G) was not monitored for the month of February
2001, in violation of the permit monthly monitoringfrequency requirement. This
constitutes one (1) failure to monitor effluent O G.
4. Effluent Benzene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in violation
of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This constitutes one (1)
failure to monitor effluent Benzene.
5. ' Effluent Toluene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in violation
of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This constitutes one (1)
failure to monitor effluent Toluene.
. Effluent :Ethyl benzene was not monitored for the month of February 2001, in
violation of the permit monthly monitoring frequency requirement. This
constitutes one (1) failure to monitor effluent Ethyl benzene.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE:
Storm water in the diked basins is visually inspected for the presence of petroleurn
shuns prier to discharge. The facility appeared to be well operated and the site properly
maintained..

Permit No, NC0021971
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
. , DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
N LPOLLUTANT DISCHARGEMIN TI N YSTEM
In compliance with the prevision of North Carolina General Statute 1-215.1,
ether lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Louis Dreyfus Energy
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Southeast Terminal
41 Old Mount Holly Road
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the Catawba: River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoringrequirements, other conditions set forth in
Parts I, H, and H1 hereof,
This permit shall become effective
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 1996
Signed this day
A. Preston Ho Jr., P.E., Director k�
.Division of Engunvironmental
ental M aemeny Authority Management Commission

Permit No. NCO021971
SUPPLE
is hereby authorized to:
"NT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
)uis Dreyfus Energy
(See Part IL of this Permit), and
2, Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an
unnamed tributary to Paw Creek which is classified Class C waters in the Catawba River Basin.

SCALE 1 2A 000
3 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 5000 7000 BEET
n 1 KILOMETER

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO021971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Qlacilgrgg Limitations Monitorina Reaulrements
LhALdu Units (1pe"t Mgmurg—mmot— SAM"I Ls-alm-"l
Mon. _A_v_cj. DAUy--M-p_x M—on, Ave. DqUy _ Mix., Frgauencv ti-9 LpgAt
IY" —n
Flow Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 45.0 mg/1 2/Month Grab E
TSS 45.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity*** Grab E
Benzene 71.4 gg/I 2/Month Grab E
Toluene 11.0 Rg/I 2/Month Grab E
Xylene Grab E
Ethylbenzene Grab E
MTBE Grab E
Lead***** Grab E
*Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours. The facility shall record the appropriate time the discharge begins and stops during a
discharge period.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
**The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
***Acute Toxicity (Pimephales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Annual, See Part 111, Condition E.
****Monitoring shall be conducted on the same schedule as the the whole effluent toxicity test.
*****Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts,

A. ). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO 21971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Efflu nt Characteristics DischargeDischpEge L1mitatjQns ftnitorina Reaulrements
LhAiday Units ispecifvl Measurement m 1 *Sam 9 ie
Mgn Aun. a ii M Mon. Avg. Daii Max. Ergquency LQkaitimn
CONTINUED......,
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I ppb. Monitoring for
MTBE and lead using an EPA. approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
except Benzene and Toluene should be perfo ed at the same time that the whole effluent toxicity test sample is taken. Should the facility fail
its whole effluent toxicity test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO021971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 00? Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Lbolday Discharue Limitations MAnitoring ftauirtmats
L)nlig (spegify) Measurement 5AmPJA *Sarnole
Mon. Avg. Dail Max Mon. Avg. 2gijy--MAx-. Er!gauencv IY" Location
Flow" Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 45.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity**** Grab E
Benzene Grab E
Toluene Grab E
Xylene Grab E
MTBE Grab E
Ethylbenzene Grab E
Lead****** Grab E
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during noalwork hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no Imitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
Acute Toxicity (Pimephales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition F.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
******Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 1month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

uuumiks) seriat numver vv4. ucn mscnarges snau ve umneo anti monnoreu oy me permutee as spec ne jow:
Effluent Charilglo r1glica Discharge LIM11411willMonitorina Rulr me"i
LbALAU nitstsoegifY) Measurement samRig m l�
M©n. Ay_ ©wily Max Mean, Auto. ally Max. ire uenCY L
CONTINUED.....
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I ppb. Monitoring for
M'TBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
should be performed during the fiat five discrete dishcre events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES pen -nit and include limits on toxicants.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCC 00219"71
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 0031 Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Efftue.nt araclerita Dsaehar C.tmitatissns it Re utre a
t_balda r tlnita eci Measurement Sample *Sample
Mean. Avg. Raily Max Mean. Aucs QgLtly Marx. e— uene T eLocation
aticrr
Flow" Weekly Instantaneous
Oil and Grease 45.0 rngll2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity**" * * * Grab E,
Benzene * * * Grab E
Toluene ; * * Grab E
Xylene * * * Grab 1=
MTBE * * * Grab
Ethylben ene * * * * Grab E
Grata E
*'Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible; then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or rather treatment equipment or facility.
** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause - ' increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
""'Acute Toxicity (Pimephales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Fart III, Condition P.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
0. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this dale, and monitoring :must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
*****Monitor if leaded fuels are stored..
The pH shall not be less than .0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shallbe monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples',
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts,

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FILIAL Permit No. NC 021971
Luring the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number OW. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the perrnittee as specified below:
Effluent Charaoterlsti s Dls harae Limitations MonitoringReaulrements
,units s eclM Measurermont mile Sam le
Mon. Avg. Daity Max Mon. Avg. DallX Max. Freauencv 1 1~ocatlon
CONTINUED......
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xlene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I pb. Monitoring for
MT13E and lead using an EPAapprovedrnethod shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stared. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
should be performed during the first five discrete dishcarge events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NC(X)2197 J
During the period beginning on the effective date of the pennit and lasting until expiration, the Pero ittee is authorived to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number ON Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
EffI,qenL_CAarac arts
1s ice _ RL--
Lbs/da Measurement — — Sample SAmp_1 e
Minn, Avg. tail y Max Mon. Avg. DAj I y_Ra x. Frequency Type Location
Flow" Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 45.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity"' * Grab E,
Benzene * Grab E
Toluene * Grab E
Xylene * Grab E
MTBE * Grab E
Ethylbenzene * Grab E
Lead*.**** Grab E
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified aboveshall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water,
Acute Toxicity (Pimcphales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition F.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be perfon-ned and reported by June
30* If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
******Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall he monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit No. NC002171
xpiration, the Pertnittee is authorized to discharge from
he permittee as specified below-
Monitorina Reaulrements
p5-Lg- v Units (SDec1fv1 Measurement Samole *_'Sam pl e
Morn. Avg Gaily Max Mon. Avq. Dai1v Max. Frequency ocat1gn
CONTINUED.....;
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I ppb. Monitoring for
MTBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameters lasted here
should be performed during the first five discrete discharge events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants.

A. (). EFFIeUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO021971
A f
During the period beginning; on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
out falls) serial number fltl Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
lwlluen Characteristics Isc'ha ge Limitations Mo itori Reau'rrements
Lbstdav Units (specify) Measu emgnt_ Sam able, *Sam le
Man. Avp. Dp, ly Max Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency Type Location
Flow" Weekly Instantaneous
Chit and Grease ; 45.0 rng/I2/Month Grab
Turbidity2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity**,* Grab E,
Benzene Grab E
Toluene * * * * Grab E
Xyten * * * * Grab
MTBE * * , * Grab E
Ethylbenzene * * . * Grab E
Lead****** * * * . Grab
Sample Locations: E - Effluent.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following iocation(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment: or facility.
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
** Acute "Toxicity (Pimephales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part 111, Condition F.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning; January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement,
******Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no disc
nts.

A. () EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NC00: 1971
During the period beginnin on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration,' the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
out falls) serial number 00 Stich discharges, shall he limited and monitored by the penuittee as specified below:
Effluent Chargcterlstics Discharge Limitation Monitoring Reaulremenill
Units eclfyd Measurement mil *Sam to
Mon. Ayct. Bally 'Max Mart. Avg. Dalfy Max. Fre uencv L Location
r'
CONTINUED......
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended„ along with the instantaneous flaw at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I ppb. Monitoring for
TBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
should be performed during the first five discrete d shharge events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whale effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants.

A (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQVIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. (X)2I 971
Daring the period beginning on die effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outl"all(s) serial number 0k Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
u e t1A---CjLajac ri i m-t.l italic n n�tc rinc t eiuirerr eni
Lbs/dav Units(soecifv) Measurement San�tale Amp le
qn. Avg. gRX___M x Mon. Avg Daily Max. Frequency T Location
Flow" Weekly Instantaneous E,
Oil and Grease 45.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity**** * * * * Grab E
Benzene * * * * * GrabE-
Toluene * * * * * Crab E
ylene * * * * * Grab E
MTE > « Grab E
Ethylbenzene Grab E
Lead" Grab
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s)a the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work. hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flaw at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff' uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
* * The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU, If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
**** Acute Toxicity (Pimephales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Fart III, Condition F.
**** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test mint be performed and repotted by June
). If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on tlae next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
*****Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than .0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples:
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FILIAL
During the period beginning can the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permi
outfall(s) serial number O(► Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as spec
Effluent Dharacteristl A Discharae Limitations
CONTINUED...,:.
eaulre ents
-units (saeclfv) Measurement Sim l *Sample
Mon. Avg. bailer Max Mon. Av. Dailv Ma.,
Freauencv Location
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
Toluene, Elt y benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I p b. Monitoring for
MTBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameterslisted here
should be performed during the first five discrete dishcarge events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whole effluent tonicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants:

A (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTSFINAL Permit No. NC0021971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittec, is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number tlt)" Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified_ below
Ef uent�C hact+r'attc Ciiactarge iirnitatican Monitoring 1e uiremnt
b ldav Vntta Lapecifyl Meaaurerpent Sam to am !e
Mon. Ay_q. 2it Max Mon. Aver. Daily Max. Frequency; '[ Location
Flow— Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 45.0 ll 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab;
Acute Toxicity**** Grab E
Benzene Grab' E
Toluene .... Grab E'
Xylene Grab E
MTBE Grab E
Ethylbenzene .... Grab E
Crab E
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following l cation(s): the nearest
accessible point alter final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during; normal work hours,
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flaw monitoring; is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along; with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
* The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
**** Acute 'Toxicity (Pimcphales, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See fart III, Condition F.
**** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then can an annual
basis°thereafter; with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by ,Tune
30 If net discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be trade to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
****Monitor if leaded fuels are stored.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2lanonth at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Effluent 'haraeterfstisLkv-dD�iar f�f,ftatfns Mvnfttrrina Reaufrr
C I Units tsgecifvt M a` ur ment m l LS—a m—p le
MPA- Avg. Daffy Max Mein. Avg. [3 it --M--o x. Frequency T Gt catf n
CONTINUED --
All VOILIFFICS of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoringis not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended,; along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
,
Toluene, Elthy benzene and Xylene shall be conducted using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least I p b. Monitoring for
MTBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stored. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
should be performed during the first five discrete dishcarge events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whale effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES permit and include limits on toxicants.

A. (. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MON1717ORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO01 71
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s);serial 'number 009 Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
f lue t CharacterLs ics
Dlschar.ge L1rn can
Mesa Lorin e' uirert n s
Lbs/da Units (sDecifv)
Measurement
Sample
*Same e
Mon. Avg, Party Max Mon.Avg..
Daily Max.
Frequency
T
Location
Flow**
Weekly
Instantaneous
E
Oil and Grease
45.0 mg/t ;
2/Month
Grab
Turbidity
* *
2/Month
Crab
E
Acute Toxicity****
* * *
Crab
E
Benzene
* * * .
Crab
E
Toluene
* .. *.
Grab
E;
Xylene
* * * * *
Grab
E
MTSE
* * «
Crab
E
Ethylbenzene
* * * * *
Crab
E
Lead******
* *
Grab
F
* Sample Locations; E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with
accessible paint after final treatm
Monitoring will be conducted slur
** All volumes of wastewater lea
record the approximate time that
This Permit imposes no limitation
discharged through y oil/water
* e discharge shall not cause
30. I
disch
***t
samples,
There shall be o dis
the monitoring requirements specified`above shall be taken at the following location( )- the nearest
ent but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
ing normal work hours.
wing the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible; then the discharger shall
discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
of the discharge of storm water runoff 'uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
rge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
;, 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition F.
filed during the .first Five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
rind beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by :Tune
31, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
nitoring requirement.
stored.
;,tandard units nor greater than fi standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
iting solids or visible foam in other than grace amounts.

Effluent Chart�erl ti t7ichargc
Man Ay,q, Dally Max Mon.
red by the permittee as specified below:
` Berns Monitorina Rcauir m t
is _( necifv) Measurement m l * S a mr l
ARY Max. Freauenev t.c�cati n
CONTINUED ......
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. if continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent .sampling. Sampling for Benzene,
ene,
To]Gzene, I lthy benzene and Xlene shall be conducted using are EPA approved method to a detection level of at least 1 ppb. Monitoring for
MTBE and lead using an EPA approved method shall be conducted if leaded fuels are stared. All monitoring for the parameters listed here
should be performed during the first five discrete dishear e events, and annually thereafter. Should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity
test, the Division may reopen this NPDES perrnit and include limits on toxicants.

.. � !1 ''
l
* � A
i" .. . � i i
� i, i. � • i
s. i � w" w A i i i;
t . $ ; � �
t ®`
.i i" � #.
; �+ w i i i i" i i i. �
i" i. ; i. i
* i• � +� i. A�. � M i i
-4 ! i
..
i. i-' ii
• .' i
-; -i �,
i-' " "i � � ; ' � '
i" • � i
{ i"
� ; + .i♦ "
�' !,
i � ,
; ; i ' ;
• .� •;s#
� i�
„ � i * .. "
® iM�
i� � , ,0
i i ; "i
� � ; ® "
; a �
t ; .�
i- ; i i i
i.
A i. �i. �i i !i
"i ii
" �; i i " i" µ® ; i A i
� i ! i
i Ai
�. f � �
s
i i i i" `i i'
. i. "-
.. � w e ; ; w . i i � .. » w <. . i
a i `i M
w ,; A i `
� - i w A
i� � i' i• " i i" i
. .
i "i 0 " w * i w i ®" .. � i �"
` � � ' � � i.
� ®. _ • i
A " w i i" i '; i
~i � i,
; $ ®'�'
.i• i - i
� # ,
'•
„ i a
w -; "; i. i
t
" " � � A A � w A
� � � ®" [�s s its ° i • *' *` �
�. * ; _ r •i
i`
! 4 ! .ii

Attention:
E B h
Alt en Sciences IWAI
North Carolina' division of,
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. : 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE. Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

FACT SBEET FOR WASTELOAD
ALLOCAT10N
Req,�T'73i
Facility Name:
Louis DreyfusE
VI3� t�'� M 7' H E a I
ICES No.:
NCO021971
Te a T .,
Type of Waste:
Industrial - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing1
l t
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving m:
unnamed tributary to Paw Creek
ENTAt MA NNO d
Stream Classification:
C t)OOR
OF GIVIRON
" Z
Subbasin:
03-08- 4
riDuRE Vsxiif REGI AL OHM
County:
Mecklenburg
RegionalOffice:
Mooresville
USGS
Requestor:
Robson
Date:
Date of Request:
2/8/94
Drainage Area ( °2):
0.'
opo
F15SW
Summer7Q10 (cfs):
0.{
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
OJ
Average Flow (cfs):
0.
30Q2 (cfs):
OJ
IWC (%):
1(
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Note: eight outfalls east at this facility. One V;LA requested to ease wacking.
Recommended by: -� " ` Date: & *,�, ,
Farrell le— h
Reviewed by
Instrearn Assessment: f ii :J !
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering: Date:1 , * s ;
c 1,4,4
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: JUN G 7 1

TOWS/ r
ULUUIU
Mon.
Flow (MG)
variable
(ail and Grease ( gll):
30
PH (S):
Settleable Solids (mlft
0.1
"TSS ( g/1):
°Tubidity ( )'
Benzene (µ/l):
monitor on
Toluene (l.tg/lt):
monitor o
ylene (gg 1)
monitor on
MTBE (µg/I)
monitor on
Ethylbe ne(pg;/l)
monitor on
Lead (}ig%1):
monitor on
€ leaded fuels are stored
PARAMETERS
Daily Max. Frequency
variable
60 2./month
-9 Zlmnth
0.2 21mondi
nr
0 21month
Aule as whole effluent toxicity test
Mon. Avg. Daily ly Max. Frequei
rD)
variable variable
-9 Vnionth
Solids (ml ft
nr nr
):
45 nth
NTU
50 nth
tg11):
I l
%l)
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity tes
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity to
,ne; (p.g/I)::
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity tes
Vl):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity tes
eft Mc , io#
icity Test: Acute / Fathead Nlinnow 24 hr
'Whedul : Annual
nitoring nr
Location
un Location
meters) are water quality itnute4a. ror some parameters, the av ante loan cap ity cat
thimmediate ate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water duality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
4R
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect t future allocations.

TOXIC /CCU ,
-Li Dudal=
Mon. Ave.
r
t
� t'
• r
t
r r t
r
r , • R
r • -.R-r a .e
IONAL PARAMETERS
Daily Max:. Frequency
variable
45 2/month
6-t 2/ nth
45 month
o 2/nth
rst five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the t
water,
nr,n&d Limits O nit oo
t
r • r r� r a r
t
r • r f x r r +- r.
t
r • r tI P I i i i I
I I X I I I It-
-.r r • -r
ed Limits
t
4
rf + r ! • r rr r t r 1 r
-iving water.

TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency W L
Flow (MIS)
variable variable
Oil and Grease ( g/l):
45 2 nth
pH (SU).
- 2/month
TSS (mg/l):
45 2/month
Tubidity )
50 2/month
Benzene (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
glen (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylben ne(gg/I)
monitor during first five discrete barge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
'The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving seater to exceed 50 NTU, If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause y increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
R
&c,!m=n—d-e,d Limits DuMdUk
Mon. Avg. Daily Max: Frequency L
Mow (MGD);
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/mondi
pH (SU):
6- 2/month
TS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity ( )
50 2/month
Benzene (.g ft
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (�.tg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
:ylene (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (gg/l).
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylben ne (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events nua y thereafter
Lead * (gg/I)
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annuallythereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are .d
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the, receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidirlty exceeds these
levels dace to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause y increase in he turbidity of the
receivingwater.
Recommended Limits �
y ' ►�Z '
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. frequency W
Flow (MOD)
variable variable
Oil d Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (Si ):
- Z(month
TSS (mg/1):
45 Z(:month
Tubidity ( )
50 nth
Benzene (gg/l):
monitor daring first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
ylene (�tgft
monitor during first five discrete harge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (gg/l): `
oni during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
tylbe ne (gg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (gg/l):
monitor daring first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are , red
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause y increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.

TOXICS/CONVENnONAL PARAMETERS
R ` 2 m nd,djitnit, DAd Il tr{i8
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency w L
Flow (MGD) variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1): 45 2/ onth
pH (SU): - 2/nionth
TSS (; ) 5 Vnionth
"Tubidity ( ) 50 nth
Benzene (gg): monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter _
Toluene (µg/): monitor n t five discrete discharge events and annually themaller
: ylene (gg(l): monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (gg/l) monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbe ne(Itg/l) monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead (ggll) monitor during t five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
* discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidirlty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.'
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS
SDecial Instructions or Conditigns a
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the
discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flaw at the
time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA approved method to a
detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tent -butyl ether ` E) and lead, if leaded fuels
are stored, using an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed at the same time that the whole effluent
toxicity test sample is taken annually. A reope er clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on
toxicants` should the facility fail its whale effluent toxicity test.
Svs-dnstru!aios Qr Conditions Qu"LQU - =
All volumes es of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring; is not feasible, then the
discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA approved method to 'a
detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tent -butyl ether E) and lead, if leaded fuels
are steered, using ;an EPA approved method, This monitoring should be performed during the first five discrete discharge
events, and annually thereafter. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be Placed on toxicants
should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity test.
Explain exact pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to tributary, etc.)
Additional Information attached? (Y" or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Nance Louis Dreyfus Energy Pe
ACUTE TOXICITYl
ftit # NCO021971 ]Pipe # 001
ONITORING (ANNUAL)
protocols defined as definitive inE.P.A. Documet
:s to Freshwater and Marine Organisms," The
•
W=
rnria-`fnr thie tPet ie 'TAP6
Attention: Err
No
En,
44(
Rai
nmental Sciences Branch
h Carolina Division of
ronmental Management
Reedy Creek Rd.
igh, N.C. 27607
' Q10 0.4 cfs
Permitted Flow n/a MG17 Recommended by:
C 10
;Basin & Sub -basin 03-08-34
Receiving Stream ut Paw Creek
County Mecklenburg Date 6 may, 1
41
AAM Fathead 24 Version 10191

Facility Name Louis Dreyfus Permit
ACUTE TOXICITY MON
p{
fi
sl
0
a
r(
n
n
it
R
Attention: En ° ox
North (
Envitor
4401
Raleil
the wash stream.
ORING (EPISODIC)
mental Sciences Branch`
arolina Division of
rnental Management
wedy Creek Rd.
, N.C. 270
7+Q 10 0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow variable MGD Recommended by _ - m
IWC 100 ram Keough,'
Basin & Sub -basin 03-0-34
Receiving Stream ut Paw Creek
County Mecklenburg Date�w
EAM Fathead 24 Version 10191

I
State of North Carolina
Department rtment of Environment,
Health and Natural ResourcesA&4
►
Division of Environmental Management �
Jpi� nes S. Hunt, Jr. Governor
Jonathan B. Hawes, Secretary
, Preston Howard, Jr., .E„ Director ����� , � �° 1 Ar,r
w x
x;
January '18, 1994
Barbara Castleberry Subject: 'NPDES Permit Application
Louis Dreyfus Energy NPDES Permit No . NC00219`]1
8800 Roswell Road Suite 200 Southeast Terminal
Atlanta,; A 3?0350
Dear Ms. Castleberry Mecklenburg County
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents onDecember'28, 1993.
Application Form
Engineering Proposal (for proposed control l facilities) ,
Request for permit renewal,
Application Processing Fee of $400.00,
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government Signoff,
Source Reduction and Recycling,
lnterbasin Transfer,
tither Request for additional stormwater outfall,,
The items checked below are needed before review can begin:
Application Form r
Engineering proposal (see attachment),
Application Processing Fee of
Delegation of Authority (see attached)
Biocide Sheet (see attached)
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government Signoff,
Source Reduction and Recycling,
Interbasin Transfer,
Other
RO. Box 29535, Raleigh, North caroling 27626-0535 Telephone 919-7; -7015 919-7 3-2496
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer recycled/ 1 post -consumer paper

If the application is not made e
returned to you and may be resin
within thirty (30) days, it will:
l when complete.
Susan RnhAnn
review of the application. -----� L 1
l am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office
Supervisor prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this
discharge if you have any questions regarding this applications,
please contact the review person listed above.
inrel
SL c
t�(; : canal. Office MOOreSvil;le Re Coleen H . Sullins, P.E.

A
Ire
Fp--r-Louis Dreyius Energy
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
P 358 263 763
December 2, 1993
Mr. D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
PERMIT MODIFICATION
LOUIS DREYFUS ENERGY/BP CHARLOTTE TERMINAL
N.PDES PERMIT NCO021971
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Dear Mr. Gleason:
In response to your November 17, 1993 letter, Louis Dreyfus Energy requests
modification to its NPDES Permit #0021971. This modification will incorporate
an additional Outfall covering sampling point of Tank #117 and Tank #118 as
indicated on the attached drawing.
If further information is needed to regarding this modification request, please icall
me at 404-518-3671.
Very truly yours,
/ A
qB ara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
copy: on Griffin, w/attachment
Bill Herchline. w/attachment
Sherer Guin, w/attachment

n
r
4L o
t
7w
Nr
t

C. Describe recce
downstream u
stream althou
small amount.
the receiving
tither permit
segment.
MP of WAS
b e C 'R Part and Sub
d in
tment Plant Classification: N/A
. w t r Code(s); 39
- OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
G;[.E'a Law', UY "i..?a "Y ;. W" w.c. ""
s (municipals only)? No
vial monitoring requests: N/A
itionsl effluent limits requests: N/A
e : /A

,',VALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
w
Signature of Report Prepa

Unocal Relining " Marketing Division
Unocal corporation
13 Oorporate Square Northeast, P.O. Box 4147
Atlanta, G is 30302
Telephone [phone]
mule NO Oftr"KNAM1.9
May 15, 1989
CERTIFIED NO. P51
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Ca
RE: NPDES PERMIT
South e -a st- -Te
NPDES Permit
Mecklinberg
Madam or Sir:
subject facility. A check for $100 is also attached to cover th
ition processing fee.
have any questions, please call me at 404/320-2272.
Very truly yours,
David R. Keasey
Manager, Marketing Environmental
ients
Norton
B. Guin
m. E. van Deusen

Attachment
NPNES PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION
Southeast Terminals (Charlotte)
NPDES Permit. No. NC 0021971
Mecklinberg County
Notes:
1. Wastewater flew consists primarily of rainwater runoff from all areas
of the facility. A small amount of the discharge results from tank
water draws, loading rack activity, and general facility maintenance.

880
St Atia
303
� to
Dear Mr. Gleason:
In response to your November 17, 1993 letter, Louis Dreyfus Energy requests
modification to its NPDES Permit #0021 71. This modification will incorporate
an additional Out all covering sampling point of Tank #1 7 and Tank #118 as
indicated on the attached drawing.
If further information is needed to regarding this modification request, please call
me at v-518-3671.
Very truly yours,
dWiAk 0,- N-�t
B tiara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
copy: Don Griffin, w/attachment
Bill Herchline, /attachment
Sherer Guin, /attachment
0 Roswell Road
e 200
rita, Georgia
5ii 1843
is Dreyfus Energy
Louis Dreyfus
NorthAMEuicb 3
CERTIFIED MAIL j CT-
RETURNl �`�
RECEIPT RE{UES
38 263 76
December 2, 1993
Mr. D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
State cal Nurtli Cai' ling
Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 2811
PERMIT MODIFICATION
LOUIS DREYFUS ENERGY/BP CHARLOTTE N
NPDES PERMIT NCO021971
MECKLENBURG COUNTY

12.02.93 09:49 AM *SOUTHEAST TERMINALS
"Woo o a v
q_
f
a
io
Y
r I 4�
a8# **-- a•
t
saw
,µ

nnppppp�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional ional 7ffice AV
James B. Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B. Moores. Secretary
Vivian H, Burke, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
%...
November 17 1993
� .
Ms Barbara Castleberry �40V
Environmental Coordinator
Louis Dreyfus Energy
8800 Roswell Road f: :
Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30350-1843
Subject: Louis Dreyfus Energy/
BP Charlotte Terminal
NPDES Permit No. NCO0 1`9 1
Mecklenburg, NC:
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
Staff has reviewed your letter dated November 4, 1993
concerning the possible need for a permit for stormwater
originating from the diked areas at the subject facility. The
subject letter was submitted in response to a Compliance Sampling
Inspection Report dated September 22, 1993.
Be advised that although a separate permit for the stormwater
runoff is not required, the existing NPEES permit probably needs, to
be modified to include at bast one Bather outfall and to provide
for the discharge of stormwater from'the diked areas.
Attached is a site drawing for the subject facility. Note the
yellow line drawn between the diked areas; this represents an open
effluent conveyance ditch which flows in a north to south
direction. The existing NP1. ES permit provides for the discharge
from two oil/water separators to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek.
The oil/water separators receive wash down water from the loading
rack and runoff from the parking lot. Any flow from the
aforementioned open ditch enters the unnamed tributary to Paw
Creek. on the drawing at the northeast corner of the diked area
around storage tank #112 is a red "X"{ this represents the point at
which samples are collected to monitor the permitted discharge in
accordance with the NPDES permit condition which states that
samples shall be taken at the nearest accessible paint after final
treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the
receiving waters.
919 North Main Street Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone]FAX[phone]
n Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 0% recycled/ 10 post -consumer paper

PPPPPP"
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
Page Two
November 17, 1993
As illustrated on the drawing, stormwater runoff from three
diked areas around storage tanks apparently enters directly into
the effluent conveyance ditch downstream of the present sampling
point. Stormwater runoff from three other diked areas apparently
enters another ditch which flows in a west to east direction and
connects to the effluent conveyance ditch, also downstream of the
present sampling point. Stormwater runoff from the diked area
around storage tanks #116 and #119 apparently enters another ditch
which is not contiguous with the effluent conveyance ditch.
If any or all of the above is true, then the Division will
require that the NPDES permit be modified to provide for additional
outfalls. It is the responsibility of Louis Dreyfus Energy to
determine if the existing NPDES permit adequately addresses all
wastewater treatment and discharge activities at the subject
facility, and to apply for a permit modification, if necessary.
Should you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
Z
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Colleen Sullins
Mr® Rusty Rozzelle, MCDEP
RMB

t MhUK UU ENV l UNM 1 HL NIA �HX ICU, W46M I Y# Ul
Post-it'brand--faxtransmiftaimerno767I f g
T . ;
r
Vic,
ss
o0ot Phone #
Fax
1
y a
00
F-J
a ren
r
ww
N

fir& , s ri ,
' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and. Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor AT
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
RECEIVED
May 26, 993 � � ex .�
Dept. f H
NR
. Barbara Castleberry U N, 1 1"
Environmental Coordinator.
Louis Dreyfus Energy l�l i ail �� t "stl-°EC
6800 Roswell Road
Atlanta, GA 30350-1843 Regional Off ice
Subject: NPaES No. N00026247
NCO 21971, NCO068063
Louis Dreyfus Enemy
P Oil Terminal
Permit Modification Requests
Guilford and Mecklenburg Counties
Clear Ms. Shaw:
In accordance with Louis Dreyfus Enemy's request originally dated June 4, 1992, we
are forwarding herewith the subject permits. The only changes In these permits are In name
and ownership as outlined In a letter from Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr. dated November 20,
1992. We also updated the permits to current UEM regulations. "these permits are Issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated December 6, 1983
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements;contained in these
permits are unacceptable- to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon Written
request' within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that these permits are not transferable. Part Ii E.4. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of these discharges.
These permits do not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 26-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
May 26, 1993
Louis Dreyfus Energy
If you have any questions concerning these permits, please contact Susan Robson at telephone
number 91 / 3 -5083.
SI rely,
e Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Director
Mr. Jim Petrick
Mooresville Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Technical Support Branch
Kim Brantley

Permit No, NCO021971
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NA11JRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RMIT
TO DI GE WASTEWATER UNDM E
NATIONAL E!QLLU-T—ANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SY TE
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 14-215.1,
ether lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina n ` a ental
Management Commission, and the :federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Louie Dreyfus Energy
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Southeast Terminal
7401 Old Mount Holly Road
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and ether conditions set forth in
Parts 1, R, and III hereof
This permit shall become effective May 28, 1993
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on November 30, 1994 -
0e,tinal signed
Coleen H. Sullins
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

�' a°r; � ,
��._

Permit No. NCO021971
SUPPLEMENT TO PERWr COVER SHEET
Louis Dreyfus Energy
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate two existing oil/water separators coin series with an oil storage tank
located t Southeast Terminal, 7401 Old Mount Holly Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Part IH of this Permit), d'
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an
'unnamed tributary to Paw Creek which is classified Class C> waters in the Catawba River Basin.

A. (), EFFLUENT LWTATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO021971
Duringthe period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, tion, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited d monitored by the perminee as specified below:
IJOILdu Units, c f Measurement 9-afflialt * Lmale
Mon. Ava. _ Mia.-AY46 Freauencv 1.2SAILM
Flow Indeter Weekly Instantaneous l
Coil and Grease 30.0 mgll 60.0 mgll 2/Month Grab E
Settleable Solids 0,1 m l l l 0.2 m l l l 2/Month Grab
Turbidity 2/Month Grab
Acute Toxicity"* « . « Grab
Benzene
Grab
Toluene
Grab
Xylene . * . grab
*Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following l ation(s): the nearest
accessible paint after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters:
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours. The facility shall record the appropriate time the discharge begins and stops during
discharge period.
This Pen -nit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
"The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water,
***Acute Toxicity (Daphnid 48 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition G. ---
****Monito ° g shall be conducted during the first rive discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification trust be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONrrORING REQUIREMENTS Permit No. NCO021971
Duringthe period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized ;to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored y the permittee as specified below:
Efflugal sties D g i imitations
Units LjtR clfvl Measurement a mpig •
ly _A [?at#v IUiax. ErmaLA"1119.11
Flow Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 30.0 mg/l 60.0 mgtl 2/Month Grab E
Settleable Solids 0.1 m l l l O.2 m I1I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity * « Grab E
Benzene- grab E
Toluene # . Grab' E
Xylene * . Grab E
SampleLocations: E - Effluent
Samples en in compliance with the monitoring requirement specified above shall be taken at the following l ation(s): the nearest accessible
point after final treatment but prier to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters. Monitoring will be conducted during normal
work hours. The facility shall record the approximate times the discharge begins and stops during a discharge period along with the
instantaneous flog at the times of effluent sampling.
Ibis Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of stonn, water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/Water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed . if the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background ndit ons, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity,in the'receiving water.
*** Acute Toxicity (C aphnid 48 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition G.
* ** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this it, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. N no discharge occurs by June 30 notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
e pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 21month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids -or visible foam in either than trace amounts.

PART i
1. The permittee shall comply with Final Effluent Limitations specified for discharges in
accordance with the following schedule:
Pe s comply "t Final Effluent Limitations by effective of the pe tunless
specified below.
2. Permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to operate the
existing facilities at optimum efficiency.
3. No later than 14 calendar days following a date identified in the above schedule of compliance,
the permittee shall submit either a report of progress or, in the case of specific actions being
required by identified dates, a written notice of compliance or noncompliance. In the latter
case, the notice shall include the cause of noncompliance, any remedial actions taken, and the
probability of meeting the next schedule requirements.

Part 11
Page 1 of 1
PART H
STANDARDONS FOR ?lE PERMITS
"
The Director of the Division of Environmental ental agement
. DEM Qt 1*sion
Means the Division of Enviromnental Management, Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources.
3. EHQ
Used herein means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
4. Act ix 'Ibr. Act'"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33
USC 1251, et. seq.
a.' The "monthly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges
sampled and/or measured during a calendar month on which daily discharges are sampled
d measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampledand/or measured during
such month. It is therefore, an arithmetic mean found by addling the weights of the
pollutant found each daffy of the month and then dividing this sum by the number of days
the tests were reported.' The limitation is identified as "Monthly Average" in Part 1 of the
pe it
_ _ .- s .. �® _• _ • • •. � •. a •a
_ � _. '• a 'm .�e � T � ,� ♦ •
-, •. • _ .. • - � � r ar _ •- a ♦. w

• � •_
•' l: •. • •..w• • •. •. •. • •
� �.
o - •.a• • •. . �- • .• • • -. -• • 4 0. .x
• e _ • ' • • • i • •
• � • ..
i... ..• •..:.. .. �... .. .. •. M ..
• i . • " • ..... a. �.. s .. •..+ .. • • .. �. •....

Part 11
Page 3 of 14
a.
Flow, (MGD): The flow limit expressed in this permit is the 24 hours average flow,
averaged monthly* It is determined as the arithmetic mean of the total daily flows recorded
during the calendar month. -
b
"instantaneous flow -measurement" is a measure of flow taken at the time of sampling,
when both "the sample and flow will be representative of the total discharge.
c.
A "continuous flaw measurement" is a measure of discharge flow from the facility which
occurs continually without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow
shallbe monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be no flaw
or for infrequent maintenance activities on the flow devi
a.
Composite Sample: A composite sample shall consist of.
(1) a series of grab samples Collected at equal time intervals over a 24 hour period of
discharge and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of
individual sample collection, or
(2) a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24 hour period with the time
intervals between samples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the
sampling point. Flaw measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by
use of a flow recorder and totalizer, and the present gallon interval between sample
collection fixed at no greater than 1/24 of the expected tonal daily flow at the treatment
system, or
() a single, continuous sample collected over a 24 hour period proportional to the rate of
flaw.
In accordance with (1) above, the time interval between influent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour, and the time interval between effluent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour except at wastewater treatment systems having a detention time
of greater than 24 hours. in such cases, effluent grab samples may be collected at time
intervals evenly spaced over the 24 hour period which am equal to number of hours to the
detention time of the system in number of days. However, in no case may the time interval
between effluent grab samples be greater than six (6) hours nor the number of samples less
than four () during a 24 hour sampling period.
b.
GrabSample: Grab samples are individual samples Collected over a period of time not
exceeding 15 minutes, the grab sample can be taken manually. Grab samples must be
representative of the discharge or the receiving waters.
.alculaoo
PAM
a
Arithmetic Mean. The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the
individual values divided by the number of individual values.
b.
Geometric . The geometric mean of any set of values is the Nth root of the product of
the individual values where N is equal to the number of individual values: The geometric
mean is equivalent to the antilog of the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the individual
values. For purposes of calculating the geometric mean, values of zero (0) shall be
considered to be one (1).

Part 11
Page 5 of 14
Penalties for Class H violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day for each day during
which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class H penalty not to
exceed $125,000.
2.
rtrrz. to iti*
' shall all reasonable steps to intro' vent y discharge sludge use
in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting
human health or the environment.
Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Part 13, C-4) and "Power Failures"
(Part II, C-7), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any
re
sponsbilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3,143-
215.6 or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is
responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for
effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may
be subject to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal .Act, 33 USG 1321.
Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even
though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
5. MY ' t
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
property, or exclusive privileges, nor does it authoriw any injury to private property or any
invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
6.
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical
structures or facilities or the undertaking of any workin any navigable waters.
e previsions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the
application ofany provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application
of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected
thereby,
g v
The permitteei shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any
information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists
for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance
with this permit. The permittee shall also fish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon
request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

-
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal
executive officer or ranking elected official.
b. All reports required by the perrnit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing
Authority shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only ff:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for
the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant
manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent
responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for
environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority.

Part Il
Page 7 of 14
c. Certification. Any person signing a document underparagraphs . b. of this section
s m the following certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance "th a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations."
12. Ecmii AWims
This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a
request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and rei s a ce, or termination,
or`a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit
condition.
13. Permit M- ti _ v anon d 1?eis u n e, ar "[e _ ination
O sib®. i y !.j»r rt
• _ • is • * . ®. • � ' � .

Part H
Page 8 of 14
2. 1 d�" '
"
The perminee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems o
treatment and control( d related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to
achieve compliance with the conditions of this permiL Proper operation d maintenance also
includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. 's
provision s the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are
installed by a pe i ` only when the operation is n s to achieve compliance with the
conditions of the permit.
3.
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted tivity in order to maintain compliance with the
condition of this permit.
4,
a. Definitions
(1) "Bypass" means the known diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment
facility including the collection system, which is not a designed or establishedor
operating mode for the facility.
() "'Severe property age" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to
the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and
permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the
absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by
delays in production.
b. Bypass not exceeding limitations.
The pemittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to
be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation.
These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Paragraphs c. and d. of this section.
c Notice
(l) Anticipated bypass; If the pemittee knows' in advance of the need for a bypass., it
shall submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass;
including g evaluation of the anticipated quality and affect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as
required in Part 11, E. 6. of this permit"` (24 hour notice).
d* Prohibition of Bypass
(1) ]Bypass is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement action
against a pe ` ittee for bypass, unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property
damage;
(B) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary
treatment facilities, retention' of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal

Part II
Page 9 of 1
periods of equipment downtime. s condition is not satisfied if adequate backup
+ q i ent oul+ have n installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering
jud ent to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment
downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(C:`) The permittee submitted notices as required under Paragraph c. of this section.
(2) The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipatedbypass, after considering its
adverse affects, if the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the three
conditions listed above in Paragraph d. (1) of this section.
S.
a. Definition.
"Upset " means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional <and temporary
noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors
beyond the reasonable control of the pe i upset does not include noncompliance
to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities,
inadequate treatment facilities, lacy of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper
operation.
b Effect t of an upset.
An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with
such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph c* of this
condition are met. No detennination made during administrative review of claims that
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final
administrative action subject to judicial review.
c. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset,
permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed., contemporaneous operating logs, or outer relevant evidence that:
(1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(2) The permittee facility was at the time being properly operated; and
() The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part H, E. 6. (b) (B) of this
permit
(4) The perTnittee complied with any remedial measures requiredunder Part Il" B.2. of this
pe it
d. Burden of proof.
In any enforcement proceeding the perTnittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset
has the burden of proof
6.Rrmc!vtd
Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment o
control of wastewaters shall be utilizedidisposed of in accordance with I CGS 143-21 .1 and in
a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering waters of the State
or navigable waters of the United States. The permittee shall comply with all existing federal

1
° !•
ao
♦ r
s�. - �-
r . « • • Y :...• :. • � t i. ". �..�... mil..,. ! � �... !
. i :.l 't ;.:i
4...P ®,�Y .��.� °�.
r • • _ -e -ls l .- ••
• .o•
11 • • � .•_
N' �
's � : • •
- � � t l
4
•' '•
- • # • ! '• � ,�. _ 1. m lW `• Y "• ! '!
' •` a w- _ �_ _ _• *- .o.• ,r _, �

a
1!" /•_i .� ! �" i - ram# • _ IF_ #• l M• i! •• • -i - •• r' -•
- `. ` r is •" r • • !, • • s
5. t ,nti
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the pe itt 's
sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained fora period of at least five
years (r longer as required by 44 CFR 503), the permittee shall retain records of all
'monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance ords and all original strip
chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required b
this permit, for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample, measurement, report
or application. Ibis period may be extended by request of the Director at any time.
?. Bfiol s�„ltc
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the
permittee shall record the following information:
a The date, exact glace, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The'individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d+ The individual(s) who performed theanalyses;
e . The analytical techniques or methods used-, and
f e results of such analyses.

Part it
Page 12 of 14
8. lu fon And Batly
Tice permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized
contractor acting as 'a representative of the Director), upon the presentation of credentials and
other documents as may be required by law, to,
. Enter upon the permittees premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this permit;
c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, 'or operations regulated or required under this permit; d
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or
as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any
location.
Tr
tJN rir'
1. T ttn ThChat,��e
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this
permit. The discharge of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a
level in excess of that authorized shall constitute a violationof the permit
2. fanned Chances
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical
alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is requited only when;
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining
whether a facility is a new source in 40 C R Part 122.29 (b); or
b'. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity o
pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to
effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42
(a) (1).
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the pe itte 's sludge use or
disposal practices, and such alternation, addition or change may justify the application of
permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including
notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application
process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
3.
tici aced Noncom fiance
The pertnittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes in the permitted
facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.

Part II
Page 14 of 14
x
don
Where the permittee becomes aware that it wiled to submit any relevant facts in a permit
application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the
Director, it shall promptly ptl submit such facts or information.
9.
e permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional
office of the Division as soon as possible, but in no case mare than 24 hours or on the nett
working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the
folio
as Any occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge o
significant amounts of wastes which am abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as the
dumping of the contents of a sludge digester; the known passage of a slag of hazardous
substance through the facility, or any other unusual circumstances.
b Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c ` Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such
station or facility:
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form
"thin 5 days following first knowledge of the occurrence.
10.
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section 348 of
the :federal Act, 33'USC 118, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be
available for public inspection at the offices of the Division of Environmental Management As
requiredby the Act, effluent data sha11 not be considered confidential, Knowingly making any
false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided
for in NCGS 1 3- 1 1(b)(2) or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
11. of Rrm=
The dean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be
maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or
noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a ?f fine of not more t $10,000 per
violation, or by imprisonment for not mare than two years per violation, or by both.

PART III
OTBER REQUIREMENTS
A. tton
No construction of wastewater treatment facilities or additions to add to the pl t"s treatment
capacity or to change the type of process utilized at the treatment plant shall be begun until
Final Plans and Specifications have been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management and writtenapproval and Authorization to Construct has been issued.
The permittee shall, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the
compliance of this NPT ES permitted facility with the current groundwater standards.
C. Changes i 'scharees
The permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to
believe.
a,That any activity has occurred or will 'occur which would result in the discharge, on
routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the pertnit, if that
discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(I) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ugly;
(2)Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ugll) for acrolein and cr lon trile; five
hundred micrograms per liter (500 ugtl) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl- . -
dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (l mg/!) for antimony;
() Five () tunes the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the
permit application,
. That any activity has occurred or will `occur which would result in any discharge, on a
non -routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if
that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (00 ugll)=
() One milligram per liter (l mg/1) for antimony;
() Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the
permit application.
D. ntin . l v luate Alternatives to Wastewater -D-ih
The pe ittee shall continually evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the
most environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the
facility is in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit
or governing rules, regulations or laws, the permittee shall submit a report in such form d
detail as required by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within
sixty (0) clays of notification by the Division.

Part III Permit No. NCO021971

PARTIV
ANNUAL ADMrNISTERING AND COMPLIANCEMONlTORING FEE REQUIREMENTS
A. The perminee must pay the,annual a °ste ` compliance monitoring fee wi
( days after being billed by the vision. ailurt to pay the fee in a timely manner in
accordance with 15A NCAC 211 .0105(b)(4) may cause this Division to initiate action to
revoke the permit.

State north Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Moomsville Wonal Office
J # S. Hunt, Jr e r . Jonathan D. Howes, _Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 1, 193
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
Lauds Dreyfus Energy
8800 Roswell Road
Atlanta, Georgia 30350 18 3
Subject. NPDES'Permit No. NCO021971
Louis Dreyfus Energy
BP Oil Terminal
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Castleberry:
our records indicate that NPDES Permit No. N O021971 was
issued on May 2, 1993 for the discharge of wastewater to the
surface waters of :the State from your facility. The purpose of
this letter is to advise you of the importance of the Permit and
the liabilities in the event of'failure 'to comply with the terms
and conditions of the Permit. If you have not already done so it
is suggested that you thoroughly read. the Permit. Of particular
importance are Pages -5;
Pages 4-5 set forth the effluent limitations and monitoring
requirements for your discharges) Your discharge(s) must not
exceed any of the limitations set forth. The section. headed
"Monitoring Requirements" describes the measurement frequencies,
sample types and sampling locations. ikon commencement of your
discharge (or operation), you must initiate the required
monitoring. The monitoring results must be entered on the
reporting forms furnished to you by this Agency. If you have not
received these forma, they should be arriving shortly. If you fail
to receive the forms, please contact this office as quickly as
possible. I have enclosed a sample of the ;"Effluent".reporting
form (bEM Form -1, plus instructions for completing the form.
It is imperative that a.21 applicable parts be completed, and the
original and one copy be submitted as required.
. BcK 950, 9t9 Nomh Main lie, NC. 2810 Sa • Telephone 704-663-t699 • FAX
n EquO Oppommity Affiniuove

Ms. Barbara Castleberry
Page Two
June 15, 1993
The remaining Parts of the Permit set forth definitions,
general conditions and special conditions applicable to the
operation of wastewater treatment facilities and/or discharges.
The conditions include special reporting requirements in the event
of:noncompliance, bypasses, treatment unit/process failures., etc.
Also addressed are requirements for a certified wastewater
treatment plant operator if you are operating wastewater treatment
facilities. Any changes in operation of wastewater treatment
facilities, quantity and type of wastewater being treated or
discharged, expansions and/or upgrading of wastewater treatment
facilities must be permitted or approved by this Agency.
Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of an NPDES
Permit subjects the Permittee to enforcement action pursuant to
Section 3-21 . of the North Carolina General Statutes. A cavil
penalty of up to $10,000 per violation plus criminal penalties may
be assessed for such.. violations. 1f you find at any time that you
are unable to comply with the terms and conditions of the Permit,
you should contact this office immediately. A Consent Order may be
necessary while pursuing action to obtain compliance.
As a final note, an NPDES Permit is normally issued for a
five-year period. Permits are not automatically renewed. Renewal
requests must be submitted to this Agency no lager than 180 days
prior to expiration. Please make note of the expiration date of
your Permit. This date is set forth can Page I of the Permit. Also
note that NPDES Permits are not transferable. if you, as the
Permittee, cease to need this Permit, then you should request that
the Permit be rescinded.
As mentioned previously, the purpose of this letter is to
advise you of the importance of your NPDES Permit. Please read the
Permit and: contact this office at 704/6 -1 99 in Mooresville if
you have any questions or need clarification. We lock forward to
providing any assistance.
Sincerely,
i
i
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality RegionalSupervisor
Enclosure
DRG:sI

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Mlle °cap l Office
J s S. Runt, Jr., Gov*rnor Jonathan S. Now**,, 8*cretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NAG EN"T
June 8, 1993
M. Barbara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
Louis Dreyfus Energy
8800 Roswell Road
Atlanta, Georgia 3 350 1843
Subject: NPDEa Permit No. NCO021971
Louis Dreyfus Energy
BP Oil 'Terminal (Southeast)
Mecklenburg County, NC
Hear Ms. Castleberry;
our records indicate that NPDES Permit No. S CO021971. was
issued on May 2 , 1993 for the discharge of wastewater to the
surface waters- of the State from your facility. The purpose of
this letter is to advise you of the importance of the Permit and
the liabilities in the event of failure to comply with the terms
and conditions of the Permit. If you have not already done so, it
is suggested that you thoroughly red the Permit. Of particular
importance are Pages 4-5
Pages -5 set forth the effluent limitations and monitoring
requirements for your cdischarge(s)t Your discharge(s) must not
exceed any of the limitations set forth. The section headed
"Monitoring Requirements" describes the measurement frequencies,
sample types and sampling locations. Upon commencement of your
discharge (or operation), you must initiate the required
monitoring, The monitoring results must: be entered on the
reporting forms furnished to you by this Agency. If you have not
received these forms, they should be arriving shortly. If you fail
to receive the forms, please contact this office as quickly .as
passible. I have enclosed a sample of the "Effluent" reporting
form (DEM Form MR-•1), plus instructions for completing the form.
It is imperative that all applicable parts be completed, and the
original and one copy be submitted as required.
PO Bw , 9t in lk, NC. m5495o • TtW�one m4-rzmm • FAX
M EgLW OppomAnky . tive Acwn EmOom

Ms. Barbara Castleberry
Page Two
June 8, 1993
The remaining Parts of the Permit set: Barth definitions,
general conditions and special conditions applicable to the
operation of wastewater treatment facilities and/or discharge(s).
The conditions include special reporting requirements in the event
of noncompliance, bypasses, treatment unit/process failures, etc.
Also addressed are requirements for a certified wastewater
treatment plant operator if you are operating wastewater treatment
facilities. Any changes in operation of wastewater treatment
facilities, quantity and type of wastewater being treated or
discharged,- expansions and/or upgrading of wastewater treatment
facilities must be permitted or approved by this Agency.
Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of an NPDE
Permit subjects the Permittee to enforcement action pursuant to
Section 143- 15.6 of the North Carolina General Statutes. A civil
penalty of up to $10,000 per violation plus criminal penalties may
be assessed for such violations. If you find at any time that you
are unable to comply with the terms and conditions of the Permit,
you should contact this office immediately. A Consent Order may be
necessary while pursuing action to obtain compliance.
As a final note, an NPDES Permit is normally issued for a
five-year period-. Permits are not automatically renewed. Renewal'
requests must be submitted to this Agency no lager than 180 days
prior to expiration. Please make note of the expiration date of
your Permit. This date is set forth on Page 1 of the Permit. Also
note that NPDES Permits are not transferable. If you, as the
Permittee, cease to need this Permit, them you should request that
the. Permit be rescinded.
As mentioned previously, the purpose of this letter is to
advise you of the importance of your NPDES Permit. Please read the
Permit and contact this Office at 704/663-1699 in Mooresville if
you have any questions or need clarification. We look forward to
providing any assistance.
Sincerely,
Q�J
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water
Quality
Regional
Supervisor

State of North Carolina'
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resource
1vtoom-sville Regional Office
James rtn, Governor .Albert F Hilton, Regional Manager
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AG ENS
September 3, 1992
Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corporation
8800 Roswell Read, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia.30350-1843
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NCO021971
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
formerly issued to
UNOCAL, Inc.
Mecklenburg County, N
Dear Mr. Mitchell.'
Our records indicate that NPEIES Permit No. N O021971 was
issued on August 21, 192 for the discharge of wastewater to the
surface waters of the Stag from your facility. The purpose o
this letter is to advise you of the importance of the Permit and
the liabilities in the event of failure to comply with the terms
and conditions of the Permit. If you have not already done so,
it is suggested that you thoroughly read the Permit. of
particular importance is Page 4.
Page 4 sets forth the effluent limitations and monitoring
requirements for your discharge(s). Your discharge(s) must not
exceed any of the limitations set forth. The section headed
"Monitoring Requirements" describes the measurement frequencies,
sample types and sampling locations. Upon commencement of your
discharge (or operation), you must initiate the required
monitoring.. The monitoring results must be entered on the
reporting forms furnished to you by this Agency. If you have not
received these ,forms, they should be arriving shortly. . f you
fail to receive the forms, please contact this Office as quickly
as possible.. I have enclosed a sample of the "Effluent"
reporting form (DEM Form 1), plus instructions for completing
the form. It is imperative that all applicable parts be
completed, and the original and one copy be submitted as
required.
The remaining Parts of the Permit set forth definitions,
general conditions and special conditions applicable to the
PO, Box 9X 919 North Main street, Mootemlle, N.C. 8115 50 • Telephone [phone] * FAX 74 3
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr
Page Two
September 3, 1992
operation of wastewater treatment facilities and/or discharge(s).
The conditions include special reporting requirements in the
event of noncompliance, bypasses, treatment unit/process
failures, etc. Also addressed are requirements for a certified
wastewater treatment plant operator if you are operating
wastewater treatment facilities. Any changes in operation of
wastewater treatment facilities, quantity and type of wastewater
being treated or discharged, expansions and/or upgrading of
wastewater treatment facilities must be permitted or approved by
this Agency.
Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of an NPDES
Permit subjects the `Pe ittee to enforcement action pursuant to
Section 143-215.6 of the North Carolina General Statutes. A
civil penalty of up to $1,00 per violation plus criminal
penalties may be assessed for such violations. If you find at
any time that you are unable to comply with the terms and-
conditionsof the Permit, you should' contact this office
immediately. A'Conent Order may be necessary while pursuing
action to obtain compliance
As a final note, an NPDES Permit is normally issued for a
five-year period. Permits are not automatically renewed.
Renewal requests must be submitted to this Agency no later than
180 days prior to expiration. Please make note of the expiration
date of your Permit. This date is set forth on Page 1 of the
Permit. Also note that NPDES Permits are not transferable. if
you, as the Permittee, cease to need this Permit, then you should
request that the Permit be rescinded.
As mentioned previously, the purpose of this letter is to
advise you of the importance of your NPDES Permit. Please read
the Permit and contact this office at 704/663-1699 in Mooresville
if you have any questions or need clarification. We look forward
to providing any assistance.
Sincerely,
4e4�14'(
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Waster Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
r-

C.
DF
�y p yg p gyr zt poNX)
n PAR #.J,tV B+A. C 34 A,.,P
SE
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, . Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
52 North Salisbury Raleigh, North Carolina 2762&035
James G. Martin, Governor A ton Toward, Jr., P..
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director
August 21, 1992
Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr.
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
8800 Roswell Road Suite 240
Atlanta., GA 30350-1843
Subject: NPDES No. N00021971
N00068063, NCO026247
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
formerlyIssued to
UNOCAL, Inc.
Guilford and Mecklenburg Counties
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
In accordance with your request received July 28, 1992, we are forwarding herewith
the subject permits now Issued to the Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. The only changes In these
permits are in name and ownership as well as update the permit to current DEM regulations.
These. permits s issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-
21.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained In these
permits are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447, Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.A. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Please take notice that these permits Is not -transferable. Part ii, E.. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change In ownership or control of this discharge.
These permits does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may
be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division
of land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other: Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning these permits, please contact Susan Robson at
telephone number 19/-5083.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Technical Support Branch
Kim 'Brantley

permit No. NG00219 1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
E,
To DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
in compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 14 - 1 .1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, d the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
uis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Southeast Terminals
7401 Mount Holly Road
Charlotte, NC
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring
requirements, and ether conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, and [I hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 21,199
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at rnidnight on November 30, 1994
Signed this day August 21,1992
• •'

Permit No. NCO021971
suppixmENT To PERwr covER, sImT
i.. as Dreyfus Energy Corp.
is hereby authorized to
1. Continue to operate two existing oil/water separators connected in series with an oil storage
tank
located at Southeast Terminals, 7401 Mount Holly =Road, Charlotte, NC, Mecklenburg County
(See Part III of this Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specifted on the attached map into
an
unnamed tributary to Paw Creek which is classified Class C waters in the Catawba River Basin.

pq
nLr,ie-i9q22=46 FROM DEHW MOURESVILLE

A. (" EFFLUENT LBWAIIONS AND MONrTORING REQUIREMENTS Permit No. NCO021971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the "t and lasting until expiration, the Pennittee is authorized to discharge
from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below.
##luent heracterlstla• r M+��Itctrtne� Reaulrernent
111jurerneral Almlals LOARIAL0
MU hex
Flow Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 30.0 mg/l 60.0 mg/l 2/Month Crab
Settleable Solids 0.1 rnl/l 0.2 ml/i "!Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Crab E
Acute Toxicity Crab
Benzene .. Grab E
Toluene Grab
Grab
Xyle .. « .
* Sample ions: E - Effluent
S plea e�ffaF
pli ce with the monitoring g requirement specified e s be n at the following l tion(s): ne t accessible
point of finnt but pr to actual discharge to mixing with theyreceiving" waters. Monitoring will be conducted during normal
work hours . `Thy s2�=rd the app x' ate ti the disch e begins d stops d ng a discharge °od along , with the
ins sous fle tiof
effluent pling
Ibis nit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activityand not
discharged through any oil/wateroil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
* * The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed S{? NTU. if the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
***Acute Toxicity (Daphnid 48 hours Monit 'ng, Episodic, S P' ill, Condition G.
*** Monitoring shall be conducted d g the t five discrete discharge is after the effective date of this Permit, d n annual
basis thereafter, with the ual be g January of the next calendaryear, annual test must be d reby June
30. If no disch g c b June 3C) notification must be made to the Division by this date, d monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge t the ual ni .ng nt.
e pH shall not be less than .0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 21nth at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

M
1. The permittee shall comply with Find Effluent Limitations specified for discharges in
accordance with the following schedule:
Permittee shall comply with Final Effluent Limitations by the effective date of the
permit unless specified below.
. Permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to operate the
existing facilities at optimuin efficiency.
. No later than 14 calendar clays following a date identified in the above schedule of
compliance, the permittee shall submit either a report of progress or, in the case of specific
actions being required by identified dates, a written notice of compliance or noncompliance.
In the latter e, the notice shall include the cause of noncompliance, remedial actions
taken, and the probability of meeting next schedule requirements.

Part II
Page 1 of 1
PART II
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR DES PERMITS
S
I. E 'S s tt. Auth °tv
e Director of the Division of Enviromnental Management.
2.o' Division
Means the Division of Environmental Management, Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources.
3.
Used herein means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
4. "the Act"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also;known as the Clean Water Act, as amended,
33 USG 1251 et. seq.
a. The "monthly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges
sampled and/or measured during a calendar month on which daily discharges are
sampled and measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampledand/or
measured during such month. It is therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the
weights of the pollutant found each day of the month and then dividing this sum by the
number of days the tests were reported. The limitation is identified a "Monthly
b. The "weekly average dischar
sampledand/or measured duri
discharges are sampled and
sampledand/or measured dur
by adding the weights of pout
sumby the number of days
"Weekly kly Average" in Part I of
c. The "maximum daily dischar
during a calendar day. If only
of pollutant calculated from i
identified as "Daily Maximum
;" is defined as the total mass of all daily' discharges
the calendar w (S - Sa ) on which daily .
easred, divided by the number of daily discharges
such week. It is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found
mts found `each day of the week and then dividing this
e tests were reported. This limitation is identified a
e permit -
a" is the total mass (weight) of a pollutant discharged
ne sample is taken during any calendar day the weight
.s the "maximum 'ly discharge." This limitation is
in Part I of the permit."

..- ,�
• !'
• M - • � r • � • , - . l • ,
is # • ! ♦ ia' ► - •:. ♦':
i i' i - li 1! !
® - # .. � •
• • •
i _ i a R i i "

Part 11
Page 4 of 1
b Geometric Me geometric mean of any set of values is the Nth root of the
product of the individual values where N is equal to the number of individual values.
The geometric is equivalent to the tilog of the • eti me of the logarithms
of the individual values. For purposes of calculating the geometric mean, values of
m'(0) shall be considered to be one 0):
c. Weighted by Flew Value: Weighted by flow value means the summation of each
concentration times its respective flow divided by the summation of the respective
flows
10. Cw0du''
calendar day is defined as the period from midnight of one day until. midnight ght of the next
day. However, for purposes of this permit, any consecutive 24-hour period that
reasonably represents the calendar day may be used for sampling.
11.
A' hazardous substance means any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant
to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act,
1. cam'Q WIuWDI
A'toxic pollutant is any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water
Act.
E
1.mly IQ camply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for
permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit
renewal application.
a. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under
section l'(a) of the Mean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for
sewage sludge use or disposal established tender section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act,
within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or
prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement.
b The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition is
subject to a civil penalty not to ex $25,000 per day for each violation.
Any person who negligently violates any permit it condition is subjecito criminal
penalties o $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than
1 year, or both. Any person who knowingly violates permitconditions is subject to
criminal penalties of $5, to $50, per day of violation, ,or imprisonment for not
more than 3 years, or both. Also, any person who violates a permit condition may be
assessed an administrative penalty not to exceed 1, per violation with the
maximum amount not to exceed $125, . [Ref: Section 309 of the Federal Act 33
U.S.C. 1319 and`40 CFR 122.41 (a)]

Part H
Page 5 of 14
. Under state law, a daily civil penalty of not more than ten thousand doll(1 )
per violation may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act i
accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [Ref: North
Carolina General Statutes § 143.215.6 (a)]
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent'any discharge in
violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human
health or the environment.
Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Part II, CA) and "Power
Failures" (Part II, ..), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the pertnittee
from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS
143-215.3,143-215.6 or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33USC 1319. Furthermore, the
pemittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the
responsibility for effective compliance :may be temporarily suspended.
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or
relieve the permitpermittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee
is or may be subject to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act,
33 USG 1321. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential darnages, such
as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily
suspended,
. Lyhts
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize y injury to private property or
any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or
regulations.
0
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore
physical structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
. &y=biUIX
The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the
application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid.., the
application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall
not be affected thereby.

S. Duty IQ Rmyjdt bf "
Part H
Page 6 of 1
} •.tt i .R .1 t ►1N 'N 1 tt ,®it t 1 t.: l # U N
corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or scab proprietorship. by a general partner or the ;proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State,, Federal, or ether public agency. by either a principal
executive officer or ranldng elected official.
b. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Permit Issming
Authority shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only i.
0) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above
(:) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility
for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of
plant manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of

discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System govern discharges
from this facility.
1,rtificd Qw=
Pursuant to Chapter -44 of North Carolina General Statutes, the permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. Such operator must hold a certification of the grade
equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities. The permitpermittee shall notify the Division's Operator Training and Certification Unit
within thirty days of any change in the O C status.

it ` , .. ! :: a -. 1► " : • i • l:" a .: i i...:
! •. -'' i • . - �, - .. • . •" !" '`• • is
lion. These bypasses are not subj t to the provisions of Paragraphs .
action:
e
including evaluation of the anticipatedquality and affect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall, submit notice of an unanticipated bypass
as required in PartII, E.6a of this permit (24-hour notice).
. Prohibition of Bypass
(1) Bypass is prohibited the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement action
against a permittee for bypass,unless:
(a) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal ;injury or severe
property age;

Part I1
Page 9 of 14
(b) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary
treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal
periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate
backup equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable
engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal
periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance;
() Thepermittee submitted noticesas required under Paragraph c. of this section.
(2) The Permit Issuing Authority approve an anticipatedbypass, after considering
its adverse affects, if the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the
three conditions listed above in Paragraph d. (1) of this section.
a.`'Definition.
"Upset " means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and
temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of
factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include
noncompliance to the extent caused by operational er, improperly designed treatment
facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, careless or
improper operation.
b ° Effect of an upset.
An upset' constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for
noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the
requirements of paragraph c. of this condition met. No determination made during
administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an
action for noncompliance, is final administrative tion subject to judicial review.
c. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset.
A permittee who `wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contemporaneous operating lags, or other relevant evidence
that:
(a) An upset occurred and that the perm`permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(b) The permittee facility was at the time being properly d
(c) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as requiredin Part I , B. 6. (b) (B) of
this permit.
(d) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part II, B.'2. of
this permit.
d. Burden of proof.
In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an
upset has the burden of proof.

Part U
Page 12 of 14
. hiss :-^, do ,and E
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to;
a. Enter upon the pe itt 's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, where must be kept under the conditions of ° permit;
b Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this` it;
c Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or o` s regulated required under this e d
d Sample or monitor at reasonable times, f the purposes of assuring permit compliance
or a otherwise authorized by the Cleanwater .Act, any substances or parameters at any
location.
L Change in Mah=
All discharges; authorized Herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this
permit. "The discharge of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a
level in excess of that authorized shall constitute a violation of the permit.
2. r c
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as n as passible of any planned physical
alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:
a.The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for
determining whether a facility is a new source in 40 CFR Part 122.29 (b); o
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity
of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which art subject
neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under 40
CFR Part 122.42 (a) 0).
e permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes in the
permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance w`th permit requirements.
4. Imuska
This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to the Director. The
Director may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permittee and
incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean water Act

a a a
V W 9 9
(B) Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit.
(C) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by
the Director in the permit to be reported within 24 hours.
c. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under
paragraph b. above of this condition if the oral report has been received within 24
hours.
7. Qjhcr Now=!=
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part H. E. 5
and 6. of this permit at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain
the information listed in Part II. E. 6. of this permit.
8. afign
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit
application, or submitted incorrect infortnation in a permit application or in any report to the
Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.

Part 11
Page 14 of 14
9. Ngagompliano, &jj fiatim
The permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional
office of the Division as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next
working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the
following:
a Any'occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge of
significant amounts of wastes'whichabnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as
the dumping of the contents of a sludge digester, the known passage of a slag of
hazardous substance through the facility; or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to
such station or facility.
Persons; reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within 5 days following first knowledge of the occurrence.
10. Availabihiy g Rep s
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-1.(a)(2) or Section 308
of the Federal Act, 33 UC11, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be
available for public inspection at the offices of the Division of Environmental Management.
As required by the Act, effluent data shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly
making any false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal
penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-1.1(b)( or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
11. Penalties
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be
maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or
noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more t $10,000 per
violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both.

PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
A. CpnSM&jjM
No construction of wastewater treatment facilities or additions to add to the plant's treatment
capacity or to change the type of process utilized at the treatment plant shall be begun until Final
Flans and Specifications have been submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
d written approval and Authorization to Construct has been issued.
B. n .
w
The permittee shall upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the compliance
of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater standards.
C. hanzes in Discharges of Toxic
The permittee shall notify the Permit issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to
believe.'
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge., on a
routine or frequent basis, of any topic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that
discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug/1)
() Two hundred micrograms per liter (0 ug/1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred
micrograms per liter (00 ug/1) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for
2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (I mg/l) forantimony;
() Five () times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit
application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any; discharge, on a
non -routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if
that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels"
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1)
() One milligram per liter (I mg/1) forantimony;
() Ten (lo) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit
application.

Part III Permit No. NCO021971
D. ACUTE TOXICITY TESTINGQ . E
Fathead 'nnow 24 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined in E.P.A. Document
600/4- 5/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms".
The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour statics
test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and subsequent testing will occur
during the first five discrete discharge ge events after the effective date of this permit. After
monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the pertnittee will conduct one test annually, with the
annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement must be
performed and reported by Juner30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to
the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the
annual test requirement
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR- 1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DM Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete d accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring' requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be reopened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

PART IV
ANNUAL ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE REQUIREMENTS
A. The permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee within 3
(thirty) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a timely manner in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .010 (b)(4) may causethis Division to initiate' action to
revoke the permit.

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph. D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
March 28, 199
Mr. David R. Keasey
Unocal Refining & Marketing Division
Unocal Corporation
PC) Box 4147'
Atlanta, Georgia 0302
Subject: Modification to NPDES
Pe it No. NC 021971
Unocal al Corporation -Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Ieasey;
• . b
27 04. Unless such a demand is made, this decision shall be final and
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-76 7 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative ,Action Employer

r
Pr
rt III Permit No. NC0021971
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT
ahead Minnow 24 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
.e permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined
E.P.A. Document. 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to
•eshwater and Marine Organisms". The monitoring shall be performed as a
Lthead Minnow (Pimephales proelas); 24 hour static test, using effluent
+llect d as a single grab sample. Effluentsamples for self -monitoring
.rposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and subsequent
tsting will occur during the first five discrete discharge events 'after the
`festive date of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity
:sts, the permittee will conduct one test annually; with the annual period
:ginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement
ist be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
ktification'will `be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing ;will
performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAEC. All toxicity testing results
required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Form (MR-1) for the 'month in which it was performed, using the
appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.C. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting
chemical/physical measurements performed in association; with the toxicity
tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the
effluents toxicity sample must be 'measured and .reported if chlorine is employed
for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests
performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental A' Management indicate
potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be reopened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements` or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document,
such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to submit suitable test
results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring srequ rements.

Unocal Refining & Marketing Division
Unocal Corporation � �a
P.U. Box 4147
Atlanta, Georgia 30302
321-7600IPV
Telephone
(404)
CERTIFIED MAIL
Certified No.Oft
Lms?690
P 095 425 894
r. .
March 9, 199
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and.
Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh,, North Carolina 27611
Attn: Mr. Ken W. Eagleson
Assistant Water Quality Section Chief
REVISION ISION OF BI "MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Southeast Terminal (Charlotte)
NPDES No. NCO021971, Mecklenburg County
Southeast Terminal (Greensboro)
NPDES No. NCO026247, Guilford County
Dear Mr. Eagleson;
XTYWNTIV
indicated that this test is now considered inappropriate for facilities whichN
infrequent and relatively small discharges,
e monitoring requirement that was considered to be more appropriate was cited
hour LC50 test utilizing Fathead Minnows (Pim phales pro las) as the test specie
indicates that we should proceed with the use of the new biomonitoring proce
future testing, and that the NPDES permits for berth of the facilities in question
modified.
Unocal is to change the biomoni oring; program at the Greensboro and Charlotte
Terminals. At each facility we will arrange to have five sequential discharges tes
the new ;procedure, and will continue with annual bio onitoring thereafter.

to make the monitoring changes, please let the know as soon as possible. Unless we are
advised otherwise, we will proceed with the new monitoring program.
If you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
David R. K asey
Manager
Marketing Environmental
DRK b c
cc: R. E. Van Deu en
C E. Wells
S. B. Guin

A ,3
y
State of [`earth Carolina
Department of Environment, _E- ealth, and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
William W, Cobey, Jr. Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AL MANAGEMENT
November 14, 199
Mrs David Kea ey
Past Office Box 4147
Atlanta, Georgia
30303
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC 0021971
Unocal Southeast Terminal
Mecklenburg County, N
Dear Mr. Keasey:
our records
indicate that NPDES Permit No. NC 0021971 was
.issued on November
3, 1989 for the discharge of 'wastewater to the
surface waters of
the State from your facility. The purpose of
o
North Main Street, Mooresville, NC, 28115 * Telephone 7 3-1699 * FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Aw
Mr. David Keasey
Page Two
November 14, 1989
unit/process failures, etc. Also addressed are requirements for
a certified wastewater treatment plant operator if you are
operating wastewater treatment facilities. Any changes in
operation of wastewater treatment facilities, quantity and type
of wastewater being treated: or discharged, expansions and/or
upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities must be permitted or
approved by this Agency.
Failure to comply with, the terms and conditions of an NPDES
Permit subjects the Permittee to enforcement action pursuant to
Section 143-215.6 of the North :CarolinaGeneral Statutes. A
civil penalty of up to $10,000 ;per violation plus criminal
penalties may be assessed for such violations. If you find at
any time that you are unable to comply with the terms and
conditions of the Permit, you should contact this Office
immediately. A Consent order may be necessary while pursuing
action to obtain compliance.
s a final note, an NPDES Permit is normally issued for a
nin ri nti_ Pp.rmi t-.s are not automatically renewed.
>viding any assistance.
Sincerely,
"
D. Rex lleasf P.
Water Quality"Regional Supervis
;ure``

Dear Mr.
I
10RO Wn
A
'o�' 'A'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environinental Managernent
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
rtin, Governor November 3, 1989 R. Paul Wdr
-obey, Jr, Secretary Direct
;asey Ap
Op
�7
N4
Q1,
30302 Or 4%
T
Subject: Permit No. NCO021971
Unocal Southeast Terminal
Mecklenburg County im"sz-,"� 9
sey.
4ftp;
cordance with your application for discharge permit received on '19t
reement between North Carolina and the US Environment
r 6, 1983.
measurement frequencies or sampling requirements con
ceptable to you, you may request a waiver or modifica-
C 2B .0508(b) by written request to the Director iden
e contended. Unless such request is made within 30 d,
it, this permit shall be final and binding. Should y�
have the right to request an adjadicatory hearing.
Land Resources, Coastal Area hfanagemppL Act or any otber Fe
permit that may be required.
any questions concerning this parmiL, please contact Mr, Ju
Yne number 919/733-5083,
Sincerely,
Orit,"al Signed BY
Donald SOrit for
R. Paul Wilms
:k, EPA

Permit No. NCO021971
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERLAIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUJAUJ DIKE1 GE ELIMIUATION SYHEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
ntlipr 1qxvfrd emni4nMe anA vAardntinno n^A nA—"+�A t— Aa XT�,+k On—l—
Unocal SoutheT
Unocal, Southeas
7401 Mount Hi
Charlotte,
Mecklenburg
fective December 1, 1989
;ion
cated at
iinals
Dad
ty
vember 3, 1989
R. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Cot

Permit No,NCO021971
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Unocal Southern Division
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate two exisfing oil/water separators connected in series with an oil storage tank
located at Unocal, Southeast Terminals, 7401 Mount Holly Road, Charlotte, NC, Mecklenburg
County (See Part III ot this Ferrmt), and

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Permit No. NCO021971
During the period beginning on the effective date of the pernait and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
�ffiq)nt _Characteristics 12ilghsl[Se Limitations M20112ring B-map-1=201S
LbLs / �da 1! n I t g_ s p-e-c-1-f y I Measur!qMent Sample Lsamatt
Mpn,__ "v palL
Mon. Ava. RgIly Max. Frequency iy-p—e 1 -0 q -8-11 -OM
Flow Weekly Instantaneous E
Oil and Grease 30.0 mg/I 60.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Settleable Solids 0A MI/I 0.2 mi/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity Grab E
Benzene Grab E
Toluene Grab E
Xylene Grab E
*Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirement specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest accessible
point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours. The facility shall record the appropriate time the discharge begins and stops during a
discharge period.
This Pen -nit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
"The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
* **Acute Toxicity (Daphnid 48 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part 111, Condition G.
""Monitoring shaJI be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Pemrit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,,notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
-11-11 1— -- A-1—�� ceiNi4c r%-r xricil-ili- fnnrn ;n "thpr tli,,in rrfu-p nmrointz

Fart l
B. Schedule of Complianm
L The permittee shy
•mittee shall
e of the perm:
mittee shill i
essary to cape
later than 14,'
edule of camp:
dress or, in 1
es, a written
e., the notice
ions taken, at
"4vamanOz

PART
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SECTION A. GENERAL CONDITIONS
I. Dut �o Comply
y —
The permittee must comply with all, condi
noncompliance constitutes a violation of
for enforcement action; for permit termi
or modification; or for denial of'a perm
2. Penalties for Violations of Permit Condi
Any person who violates a permit conditi
to exceed $10,000 per day of such violat
Part If
Page 1. of 14
R NPDES PERMITS
ns of this permit. Any permit
t renewal application.
ions
n Is subject to a civil penall
iolates a permit condition is guilty of a misdemeanor I
to exceed $15,000 per day of violation, or by imprisoi
six months or both.
ate
T UTI 1t_1C[ZNUJ1t1
s resulting from ni
I _s permit, including accelerated or, additional mon
-ermine the nature and impact of the noncomplying
-lion
I opportunity for a hearing pursuant to NCGS 143-2
ked in whole or in part dining its term for cause including, but not
to, the following:
DIstion of any terms or conditions of this permit;
taining this permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully
I relevant facts;
hange in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent
luction or elimination of the authorized discharge; or
formation newly acquired by the Division indicating the discharge poses
threat to human health or welfare.
)ermittee believes that any past or planned activity would be cause for
ition or revocation and reissuance, the permittee must report such
wicn to the Permit IssuinR Authority. The submittal of a new application

Part II
Page 2 of 14
may be required of the permittee. The filing of a request by the permittee for
a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or termination, or a
notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliances, does not stay
any permit condition.
5. Toxic Pollutants
Notwithstanding Part IT, A-4 above, if a toxic effluent standard or prohibition
(including any schedule of compliance specified in such effluent standard o
prohibition) is established under Section 307(a) of the Act for a toxic
pollutant which is present its the discharge, if such standard or prohibition
is more stringent than any limitation for such pollutant in this permit, this
permit shall be revised or modified in accordance with the toxic effluent
standard prohibition and the permittee so notified.
They permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established
under Section 307(1) of the Clean later Act for toxic pollutants within the
time Provided in the regulations that establish thosestandards or prohibitions
even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement.
6, Civil area Criminal Liabili�t
Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing' (fart IT, B-3)' and
"Power Failures" (Part IT, B-6), nothing in this permit shall be construed
to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties
U'J. rurtnermorf
s •
Substance Liabil
in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution' of any
.t.ion or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities,
.ties to which the permittee is or may be subject to under NGGS
75 et sect. or Section 311. of the Federal Act,°33 USC 1321. Furthermore,
a%ttee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish hills,
augh the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily;
ad
r Rights
cance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real
anal property, or any: exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any
.o private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any
,me of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.

Part 11
Page 3 of 14
9. Onshore of Offshore Construction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or
offshore physical structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work
in any navigable caters.
10. SeverabilLty
The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any prevision of this
permit, ;or the application of any; provision of this permit to any circumstances,
is held invalid, the application of such prevision to other circumstances, and
the remainder of this permit, shill not be affected thereby.
°11 . duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reason-
able time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request
to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing,
or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The
permittee shall also furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon request,
copies of records required to be kept by this permit,
SECTION R. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POILUrION CONTROLS
1 `roper Operation and Maintenance
The permitted shall at all times maintain in good working order and operate
as efficiently as possible all treatment or control. facilities or systems
-installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the terms
and conditions of this permit,
2. Need to halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it;
would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in
order to maintain compliance with the condition of this permit.
3. E assi g
Any diversion from or bypass of facilities is prohibited, except (i) where
unavoidable to prevent loss of life or severe property damage, or (iii
where excessive storm drainage or runoff would damage any facilities
necessary for compliance with the effluent limitations and.; prohibitions of this
permit. All permittees who have such sewer bypasses or overflows of this
discharge shall submit, not later than six months from the date of issuance
of this permit, detailed data or engineering estimates which identify:
a. The location of each sewer system bypass or overflow;
b. The frequency, dnrntion anti quantity of flow from each sewer system
bypass or overflow.

Part 11
Page 4 of 1.4
This requirement is waived where infiltration/inflow analyses are scheduled
to be performed as part of an Environmental Protection Agency facilities
planning project.
The permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or
appropriate regional office of the Division as soon as possible, but in
no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the
occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence'of any division from or
bypass of facilities.
4. P2�iets�
,, Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and
temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations
because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permitt ee. An upset
does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error,
.ethnology based permit lim'Itation if the requirements of
S) are met.
>stances
edges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in tbc
15.1 and in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such
from entering waters of the State or navigable waters of the United
urea
tee is responsible for maintAining adequate safeguards as required
ulation, Title 15, North Carolina Admini-StVatiV0, Code,i Subchapter 211,
ability, to prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated
ing electrical power failures either by means of <alternate power
tandby generators or retention of inadequately treated effluent.
NITORING AND RECORDS
Live SaTpl.ing
Ilected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be
stet of the volume and nature of the permitted discharge. Samples
at a frequency loss than daily shall be taken on a day and time that
eristic of the discharge over the entire period which the sample
. All samples shall be taken at the monitoring points specified in
t and, unless otherwise specified , before the effluent joins or is
any other wastestream, body of water, or substance. Monitoring points
ie changed without notification to and the approval of the Permit
Lhority.

2 . Rqp9s t in
Monitoring results obtained during the p:
Part II
Page 5 of 1.4
jiouq month(q) shn1l be qnmmn-ri7.Pd for
each month and reported on a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
(DEM No, MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director, DE�,
postmarked no later than the 30tb day following the completed reporting peri
The first DM R is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of
permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month follou
the commencement of discharge. Duplicate signed copies of these, and all ot
reports required berein, shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
3 Flow Measurements
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted
,scientific practices shall be selected and used to insure the, accuracy and
reliability of measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. The
devices shall, be installed, calibrated and maintained to insure that the
accuracy of the measurements are consistent with the accepted. capability of
that typo of device. Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows
with a maximum deviation of less then + 10% from the true discharge rates
throughout the range of expected, discharge volumes. Once -through condenser
cooling water flow which is monitored by pump logs, or pump hour meters as
specified in Part T of this permit and based on the manufacturer's pump
curves shall not be subject to this requirement.
4. Test.-Troc.edwres
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC
regulations published pursuant to NCGS 143-215.63 et seq, the Water and Air
Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant to Section 304
33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended, and
Regulation 40 CFR 136.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this permit, all test
procedures must produce minimum detection and reporting levels that are belo
the permit discharge requirements and all, data generated must be reported do
to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure.
approved methods are determined capable of achieving minimum detectior
reporting levels below, permit discharge requirements, then the most sells
(method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved m
must be used.

Part If
Pages 6 of 14
5. Penalties for Tamperin
The Clean Water Act provides that <any person who falsifies, tampers with, or
knowingly renders inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be
maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, by punished by a fine of
not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than
six months per violation, or by bath.
6 Records Retention
All records and information <resulting from the monitoring activities required by
this permit including all, records of analyses performed and calibration and
maintenance of instrumentation and recordings from continuous monitoring
instrumentation shall be retained for a minimum of three () years by the
permittee. This period of retention shall be extended during the course
of any unresolved 'litigation or if requested by the Division of Environmental
Management or the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection .Agency.
7. Recordi Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this
permit, the ermittee shall record the following information:
a. The exact place, date, and time of sampling
b. The: dates the analyses were performed;
C. The person(s) who performed the analyses; and
d. The results of such analyses.
Management, the ttegional Administrator, and/or their Authorised represent'
upon the presentations of credentials:
a. To enter upon the ermitt.ee`-s premises where an effluent source is 1,
or in which any records are required to be kept finder the terms and
conditions of this permit; and
b. At reasonable~ times to have access to and copy any records required
kept under the terms and conditions of this permit:; to Inspect any
monitoring equipment or monitoring method required in this ;permit; a'
to sample any discharge of pollutants.

Part II
Page 7 of 14
SECTION D. REPORTING R2 CA MENTS
1 Change in lis'chare
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and
conditions of this permit. The discharge of any pollutant 'identified in
this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized
shall constitute a violation of the permit. Any anticipated facility'
expansions, production. increases, or process modifications which will result
in new, different, or increased discharges of pollutants must be reported by
submission of a new NPD S application or, if such changes will not violate
the effluent limitations specified in this permit, by notice to the DEM of
such changes.' Following such notice, the permit may be modified to specify
and limit any pollutants not previously limited.
Anticipated Noncom Banos
The permi.ttee shall give notice to the Permit Issuing Authority of any planned
change in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance
with permit requirements. Any maintenance of facilities, which might
necessitate unavoidable interruption of operation and degradation of effluent
quality, shall be scheduled during noncritical water duality periods and carried
out in a manner approved by the Permit Issuing ,Authority.
. Transfer of Ownership or Control
This permit is not transferable. In the event of any `change in name, control
ective owner. A copy of the letter shall be forwarded to t
snmental Management.
rin bar Permi.tte
monitors any pollutant at the location(s) designated herein
ntvt a.z .c.. ue: ac-sy eIlcaaa .L. %4u-Lj. :v kay ;aLI.La Z.+c.e. creamu, a .:i.cXr, t�a.�.rlr�..+ — uusca a.y e.xa„..u.x.,
as specified above, the results of such monitoring shall be included in
calculation and reporting of the values is required in the DMR, Such i
frequency shall also be indicated. The DEM may require more frequent ma
or the monitoring of other pollutants not required in this ;permit by tar:
notification.
5 vera;inof Measurements
Calculations for limitations which require averaging of measurements sh
utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified by the Permit Iss
Authority in the permit.

Part II
Page 8 of 14
fa Noncompliance Notification
The permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the
appropriate regional office of the Division as soon as possible, but in
no case 'more ;than 24 hours or on the next working day following the
occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the fallowing:
a. Any occurrence at the water pollution control, facility which results in
the discharge of significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in
quantity or characteristic, such as the dumping of the contents of a
sludge digester; the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance
through the facility, or any other unusual circumstances.
b.' Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, ;that render
the facility incapble of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical;
or electrical failures of pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
C. Any failure of a pumping station,; sewer line, or treatment facility
resulting in a by-pass directly to receiving waters without treatment
of all or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
d. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has
gone out of compliance with its NPDES permit limitations.
Persons reporting ;such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written
report in letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the
occurrence.
7. ChangeChaugeain Discharges of Toxic Substances:
The permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or
has :reason to believe:
A. Tliat any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the
discharge, on a routine' or frequent Basis, of any toxic substance(s) (listed
at'40 CFR S 122, Appendix D, Table 11 and 111) which is not limited in the
permit, if that discharge will exceed the Highest of the following
itnotification levels".
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug/I),
(2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (0 ug/1) for acrolein and
acrylon trile; five hundred micrograms per liter'(500 ug/1)
for ,4-dinitrophenol and for -methyl-4,-dinitrophenol; and one
milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for antimony; or
() Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that
pollutant(s) in the permit application.

Part II
Page 9 of 14
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any
discharge, on a non -routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant
(listed at 40 CFR S 122, Appendix D. 'Table II and III) which is not
limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels":'
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ugjl)w
(2) One milligram per liter (1 /1) for antimony; or
(3) Teti (1 ) times the maximum concentration value reported for that
pollutant(s)`in the permit application.-
S'. Expiration .,of Permit
Permittee is: not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to
receive authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the permittee
shall submitsuch information, farms, and fees as are required by the agency
authorized to issue permits no later than 18€I clays prior to the expiration date.
Any discharge without a permit after the expiration will subject the permittee
to enforcement procedures as provided in NCS 143-215.6 and 33 LSC 1251 et seq.`'
9. incsr3'_ IZecuiremens
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Permit Issuing
Authority shall be signed and certified.
a. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the
purpose of this Section, a responsible corporate ;officer means:
(a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice president of the
corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any
other person who performs similar policy or decision making
functions for the corporation, or (b) the manager of one or more
manufacturing production or operating facilities employing more
than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures
exceeding 25 million (In second quarter 1980 dollars), if authority
to sign ,documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in
accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship; by a general partner or
the proprietor, respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency; by either
a principal executive officer or ranking elected official.

Part II
Page 10 of 14
b All reports required ley the permit and other information requested by the
Permit Issuing Authority shall be signed by a person described above or by
a duly authorized representative of that person, A ,person is a duly
authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having
responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility o
activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or
well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent ;responsibility,
or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environ-
mental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative
may thus be either a named individual` or any individual occupying a
named position,); and
() The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority.
C. Certification. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b, o
this section shall making the following certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law', that this document and all attachments
were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information,` the 'information submitted is, to the best of 'my knowledge and
believe, true, accurate, and complete:: I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
10. Av i.Iabi1 jt_ cif Rpurr
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 1:43-215.3(a) (2) or
Section 308 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance
with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the
Division of Environmental Management. As required by the Act, effluent data
shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly making any false statement on
any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided
for in NCGS 143-215.1(b) (2) or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
It. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Waster Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document
submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring
reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be
punished by a fine of :not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment
for not more than six months per violation, or by both.

Part II
Page 11 of 14
SECTION E. DEFINITION
1. Permit 1,ssuing Aulhorit . . ...... y
The Director of the Division of Environmental Management.
2. DEM or Division
Means the Division, of Environmental Management, Department of Natural
Resources and Community DeveJopment, 3. EMC:
Used herein means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
3. EMC
Used herein means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
4. Act or - "the .Act"
,The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as
amended, 33 US C 1251, et. seq.
S. ggssLDay_Mea,§uremqAt_q
a. The "monthly average discharge: is defined as the total mass of all
which daily discharges are sample and measured, divided by the number
of daily discharges samples and/or measured during such month. It is
therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the weights of the
pollutant found each day of the month and then dividing this sum by
the number of days the tests were reported. The limitation is
Identified as "Monthly Average" in Part I of the permit.
b. The "weekly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of
all daily discharges sampled "and/or' measured during the calendar week
(Sunday -Saturday) on which daily discharges are sampled and measured,
divided by the., number of daily discharges samples and/or measured
during such week. It is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found by
adding the weights of pollutants found each day of the week and then
dividing this sum by the number of days the tests were reported. This
limitation is identified as "Weekly Average" in, Part I of the permit.
C. The "maximum daily disc -barge" is the total mass (weight) of a
pollutant discharged during a calendar day. If only one sample is
taken during any calendar day the weight of pollutant calculated from
it is the, "maximum daily discharge," This limitation is identified as
"Daily Maximum," in Part I of tbe permit.

Part If
Page 12 of 14
d. The "average annual discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily
Limits" in Part I of the
weekly concentration," of
itified as "Monthly Avc,
,rmit.
=r than for fecal calif
E
ntration values). The daily concentration value is equal to the
ntration of a composite sample or in the case of grab samples is the
metic mean (weighted by flow value) of all the samples collected during
calendar. day. The average weekly count for fecal col form bacteria is
eometric mean of the counts for samples collected during a calendar
This limitation is identiflod as "Weekly Average" under "Other
sl' In Part I of the permit.
maximum daily concentration" is the concentration of a pollutant
are during a calendar day. If only one sample is taken during any
dar day the concentration of pollutant calculated from it is the
mum Daily Concentration". It is identified as "Daily Maximum" under
r Limits" in Part I of the permit.

Part II
Page 13 of 14
d. The "average annual concen
is the sum of the concentr
measured during a calendar
measured divided by the nu
during such year (arithmet
daily concentration value
sample or in the case of g
flow value) of all the sam
average yearly count for f
of the counts for samples
limitation is identified
of the permit.
7. Other Measurements
a, Flow, (MGD): The flow limit expre
verage" under "Other Limits" in Part I
- dissolved oxygen only) is the
is identitlea as vaiiy minimum unu
rmit.
ssed in this permit is the 24 hours
,nstantaneous flow measurement" is a measure of flow taken a-
[mpling, when both the sample and flow will be representativ,
. discharge.
'�ampjes
�site sample. These samples consist of grab samples collet
-4-
collected proportionally to flow, or equal volumes taken at varying time
intervals. If a composite sample is obtained from grab samples, the
following requirements apply. The intervals between influent grab
samples shall be no greater than hourly. Intervals between effluent grab
samples shall be no greater than hourly except where the detention time
of the wastewater in the facility is greater than 24 hours, in which
case, the interval between grab samples shall be no greater in number of
hours than the detention time in number of days;',provided, however, in
no case may the time between effluent grab samples be greater than six
hours nor the number of grab samples less than four during any discharge
period of 24 hours or less.
b. Grab Sample: Grab samples are individual samples collected over a
period of time not exceeding 15 minutes; the grab sample can be taken
manually.

Part II
Page 14 of 14
. Calculation of Means
a Arithmetic Mean. The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation
of the individual values divided by the number of individual values.
b. Geometric Mean: The geometric mean of any ;set of values is the Nth root of
the product of the individual values where N is equal, to the number of
individual values. The geometric mean is equivalent to the ant log of
the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the individual values. For
purposes of calculating the geometric mean, values of zero`(0) shall be
considered to be one (1).
C. Weighted by FlowValue: Weighted by flow value means the summation of each
concentration times its respective flow divided by the summation of the
respective flows.
10. Calendar Da
A'calendar day is defined as the period from midnight of one day until midnight
of the next day. However, for purposes of this permit, any consecutive 24-hour
period that reasonably represents the calendar day may be used for sampling.
It. Hazardous Substance
A hazardous substance means any substance designated under 40 Cl*R Part 116
pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean hater Act.
1. Toxic Pollutant
A'toxic Pollutant is any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of
the Clean Water Act.
Devised 6f8

PART I I I
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
A. Previous Permits
All previous State water quality hermits issued to this facility, whether for
construction or operation or discharge, are hereby revoked by issuance of this
permit. The conditions requirements, terms, and provisions of this permit
authorizing discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System govern discharges from this facility.
B. Construction
No construction ofwastewater treatment facilities or additions thereto shall
be begun until :Final Plans and Specifications have been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management and written approval and Authorization
to Construct has been issued
C. Cer ifi ct U gyrator
Pursuant to Chapter 90A-4 of North Carolina General Statutes, the permittee
shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator in responsible
charge (ORC) of the wastewater treatment facilities. Such operator must
hold a certification of the grade equivalent to or greater than the
classification assigned to the wastewater treatment Facilities. The
permittee shall notify the Division's Operator Training and Certification
Emit within five days of any change in the ORC status.
D. Groundwater Monito in
The; permittee shah, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of
Environmental Management, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required
to determine the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current
groundwater standards.
E. Lim .tatiora cape s
This permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply
with any applicable effluent <guideline `or water quality standard;issued or
approved under Sections'302(b) (2) (c) and (d), 3044(b) (2) and 307( ) (2)
of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent guideline or water quality standard
so issued or approved:
1. contains` different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any
effluent limitation in the permit; or
2. controls any pollutant not limited in the permit.
The; permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any
other requirements in the Act then applicable.

F. TOXICITY REOPENER
This permit shall be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate toxicity limitations and
monitoring requirements in the event toxicity testing or other studies conducted on the effluent
or receiving stream indicate that detrimental effects may be expected in the receiving stream as
a result of this discharge.
Alowing address:
iences Branch
vision of
,nagement
M.
be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
arformed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response
ual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if
ted for disinfection of the waste stream.
lata from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving
it may be reopened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements

or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test. Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring
requirements.
H. OIL TERMINAL CONDITION
The daily average limitations for oil and grease stated in Part 1, A. shall be deemed to have been
exceeded if either:
a. the arithmetic average of the analyses of all representative samples taken during a calendar
month by the permittee in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth above exceeds
30 mg/l, or
b. the analyses of any two representative grab samples taken by the State at least six hours
apart during any consecutive thirty day period each individually exceeds 30.0 mg/l.
Each sample taken by either the permittee or the State shall be presumed to be representative.
However, due to the variability of the sampling and analysis of oil and grease discharges from
petroleum marketing terminals, the permittee may in good faith declare a maximum of 10% of
i must include the results of the analysis of the excluded sam
for the exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so excluded
ation shall be the arithmetic average of the analyses of the rem
'n" limitations for oil and grease stated in Part I. A. shall be deerr
then:
ierage of the analyses of all representative samples taken during
nittee or by this State (a minimum of two samples taken at leas
,a with the monitoring requirements set forth above exceeds 60.0

b. the analysis of'a single sample (when it is the only one taken during the day by the permittee)
exceeds 60.0 mg/l.
Each sample taken by either the permittee or the State shall be presumed to be representative.
However, due to the variability of the sampling and analysis of oil and grease discharges from
petroleum marketing terminals, the permittee may in good faith declare a maximum of 10% of
the samples taken by it during a calendar year, but not more than one sample taken during any
calendar month, to be non -representative. No sample may be so excluded if it is the only
sample taken by the permittee during a calendar month. Such a declaration must be included in
writing with the next Discharge Monitoring Report submitted in accordance with Part I., C., 2.
of this permit, and must include the results of the analysis of the excluded sample, and a
written explanation for the exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so excluded, the "daily
average" concentration shall be the arithmetic average of the analyses of the remaining non -
excluded samples.
Other petroleum company officials have contended that, while the discharges from most of their
marketing and bulk terminals are capable of meeting this "daily maximum" limitation as stated
above, certain of their facilities cannot be so equipped to meet this limitation as stated above. If
the permittee can present sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this facility cannot be so
equipped, the State will modify this limitation to the extent needed (in no case to exceed 100.0
mg/1) to assure reasonable compliance with the "daily maximum" limitation.
It is recognized that influent quality changes, equipment malfunction, or other circumstances
may sometimes result in effluent concentrations exceeding the permit limitations despite the
exercise of appropriate care and maintenance measures, and corrective measures by the
permittee. The permittee may come forward to demonstrate to the State that such
ate will consider such information in determining appropria
to be taken.
defined as any consecutive 24 hour period.
mum" concentration is defined as the arithmetic average of
ab samples taken during any calendar day. should effluent sa
ie calendar day during the month, the arithmetic average indic,
concentration shall be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Ri
presentative samples shall be required during periods of disct
:harge during normal working hours, the permittee shall report

Drting period.
g days during the reporting period. Flow may be calculated utilizing a flow r
ige, or any other similar device.
iection with submission of records and reports required under this perm

PART I
ANNUAL ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE NCE FEE REQUIREMENTS
A. The permittee must pay the annual administering,;and compliance fee within 30
(thirty) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a`
timely manner in accordance with 15 NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause this Division
to initiate action to revoke the permit.

Permit No.NCO021971
STATE OF NC I
Utt�Ah I MAIN I Ut- INA I UKAL Ht:bUUKUt:Z5
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMEI
PERMIT
TO DI' SCHARGE WASTEW/
NAIIQNAL PQLLUIA-NI QISQHAB
\ROLINA
JD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
4LMANAGEMENT
RUNDERTHE
ELI JINA 'ION SYSTEM
Statute 143-2t5.1,
ited by thf-, Nnrtb Cnrnlinq FnvimmnPntn1
Unocal Southern Division
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Unocal, Southeast Terminals
7401 Mount Holly Road
Charlotte, NC
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts 1, 11, and III hereof.
This permit shall become effective
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on
Signed this day DRAFT
R. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Conarnission

SUPPLEMENT T(
Unocal Soi
reby authorized to:
Part III of this Permit), and
Permit No,NCO021971
COVER SHEET
ion
connected in series with an oil storage tank
Holly Road, Charlotte, NC, Mecklenburg

'FLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Permit No. NC O021971
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Charycteri tics 12iggharge Limjjjjtl2n§Monilgringw enuirement
Lbs/day Li "ls (specifyi Measurement Sammie
* am
Men, Avct. Cta1 Ma...?� Mons Aa. Daily Max. Fre `uenc coca icon
Flow ` Weekly Instantaneous
Gil and Grease 3M mg/I 60.0 mg/I 2/Month Grab E
Settleable Solids M mI/I 0.2 ml/I 2/Month Grab E
Turbidity * 2/Month Grab E
Acute Toxicity * * * Grab E
Benzene Grab E
Toluene * # * Grab E
Xylene .. Grab E
*Sample Locations; E -'Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirement specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest accessible
point after final treatment but prier to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours. The facility shall record the appropriate time the discharge begins and stops during a
discharge period.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharges through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
**The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
***cute Toxicity (Daphnid 48 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition G.
""Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by ;tune 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
The pH shall not be less than .0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

F. TOXICITY REOPENER
This permit shall be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate toxicity limitations and
monitoring requirements in the event toxicity testing or other studies conducted on the effluent
or receiving stream indicate that detrimental effects may be expected in the receiving stream as
a result of this discharge.
G. ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT
Daphnid 48 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
The permttee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined in E.P.A. Document
600/4-861013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms".
The monitoring shall be performed as a Daphnia pulex or Ceriodaphnia 48 hourstatic test,
using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes
must be obtained below all waste' treatment. Sampling and; subsequent' testing will occur during
the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this permit.
The parameter code for this test if using Daphnia pulex is TAA3D. The parameter code for this
test' if using Ceriodaphnia is TAAB. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent' Discharge Form ('MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM''Form AT-1 (original) i
to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response
data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if
chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving
stream, this permit may be reopened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements

or 'limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document,`' such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid'
test. Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring
requirements.
N. OIL TERMINAL CONDITION
The daily average limitations for oil and grease stated in Part 1, A. shall be deemed to have been
exceededif either:
or
ialyses of any two representative grab samples taken by the State at least
ng any consecutive thirty day period each individually exceeds 30.0 mg/l.
However, due to the variability of the sampling and analysis of oil and grease discharge,
petroleum marketing terminals, the permittee may in good faith declare a maximum of f
the samples taken by it during a calendar year; but not more than one sample taken, by it d
a calendar month, to be non -representative. No sample may be so excluded if it is thi
sample taken by the permittee during a calendar month. Such a declaration must be inclup
writing with the next Discharge Monitoring Report submitted in accordance with Part I.,
of this permit, and must include the results of the analysis of the excluded sample,
written explanation for the exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so excluded, the
average" concentration shall be the arithmetic average of the analyses of the rernainin
excluded samples.
The "daily maximum" limitations for oil and grease stated in Part I., A. shall be deemed to
been exceeded if either:
a. the arithmetic average of the analyses of all representative samples taken during a cal
month by the permittee or by this State (a minimum of two samples taken at least six
apart) in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth above exceeds 60.0 mg/l,

b. the analysis of a single sample (when it is the only one taken during the day by the permittee)
exceeds 60.0 mg/l.
Each sample taken by either the permittee or the State shall be presumed to be representative.
However, due to the variability of the sampling and analysis of oil and grease discharges from
petroleum marketing terminals, the permittee may in good faith declare a maximum of 10% of
the samples taken by it during a calendar year, but not more than one sample taken during any
calendar month, to be non -representative. No sample may be so excluded if it is the only
sample taken by the permittee during a calendar month. Such a declaration must be included in
writing with the next Discharge Monitoring Report submitted in accordance with Part L, C., 2.
of this permit, and must include the results of the analysis of the excluded sample, and a
written explanation for the exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so excluded, the "daily
average" concentration shall be the arithmetic average of the analyses of the remaining non -
excluded samples.
Other petroleum company officials have contended that, while the discharges from most of their
marketing and bulk terminals are capable of meeting this "daily maximum" limitation as stated
exercise of appropriate care and maintenance measures, and corrective measur
permittee. The permittee may come forward to demonstrate to the State
circumstances exist in any case where effluent concentrations exceed those set to
permit. The State will consider such information in determining appropriate er
measures, if any, to be taken.
A calendar day is defined as any consecutive 24 hour period.
The "daily maximum" concentration is defined as the arithmetic average of one
representative grab samples taken during any calendar day. should effluent samplin,,
on more than one calendar day during the month, the arithmetic average indicating
"daily maximum" concentration shall be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report
Collection of representative samples shall be required during periods of discharget
there be no discharge during normal working hours, the permittee shall report "no j

for that reporting period.
The reported flow shall be the arithmetic average of the total volume discharged on each of th9
sampling days during the reporting period. Flow may be calculated utilizing a flaw recorder
rain gauge, or any other similar device.
der or by the Fifth Amendment of the United States' Constitution.

�LLOCATION
Modeler Dzte Rec
V'.. 1 L)ralnage ^Fza %tail 4. 0-
PROPOOD
7Q10 (cfs) L inter 7Q10 (cfs) ' .., 3UQ2 (of ) c
. Traxl ity 1 I its: IWC 11), t tr+ 14 Acute Chronic
for ` nox
t w Instream Monitoring:
00
Pipe Nvc
:
Datign ,Capacity (MGD): �t k Parameters
Domestic (
of Flow): Upstream Location
00
Industrial (% of Flow):— � wr �k Downstream Location
Comments: v
Monthly Daily Monitor.
Average Maximum Freq.
Z Wasteflow (gd); EPISODIC
"... � Oil &Grease (mg/I): O bO 2/ono.
Settleable solids (ml/I)y O.1 01 /mo»
RECEIVING STREAM: -� 2/snow
PH :(SEE):
Class. Turbidity ( ETU)' 50 /mo.
ub lissin. ( -j 2 --5 (ug/I): 25
�jltlt#tlRs� attach) � Toxicity Testing Req .Acute - TsapEsid 4 Ysr
R+�f*ronce CISGS Quad- ___.__ ____-. _ __- MONITORING ___________________.__.._________-__.._
Gt Upstream(X/N). N Location:
County:
--------------- COMMENTS ..
__.______®______ .. ________:._ n___-®_
Rastcna1 t►ffic Ao Fa Mtcr Re We WI W EEO__ ____KKW ....MONITORING REQUIREMENT. THE DISCHARGE SHALL RECORD
APPROX-
IMAtcirll«
TE TIMES THAT DISCHARGE BEGAN AND ENDED, ALONG WITH THE INSTANTANEOUS FLOW
L AT . TIMES OF EFFLUENT LING. O LUENT MONITORING FOR BEN ,
Requested By: � ? ate» Ida# TOL , AND NE D NG F 5 GI DI GE EVENTS (AND
THEN
ALLY TO COINCIDE WITH LE EFFLUENT TOXICITY ) AFTER THE EFFKTIVE
Date: DATE OF NrDES F" IT . MONITORING AT
ME SAME TIME, THAT THE
Prepared By- i WHOLEEMUMTOXICITY SAMpLE IS TAM DURING THE DISCHARGE EVENT
c RE
'COMMEND RE
'OpENER CLAUSE IN pEkKff TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL L114iTS ON THESE O
Ite ie a By: Date: �' i O TOXICANTS FACILITY FAIL IT LE- TOXICITY TS«
WITHIN O DAYS OF FIRST DISCHARGE T F E L IT
' RESULTS OF FOLLOWING ANALYSES. SE Y aF. L BE P ON A
14 fi T DI ROE, T ER ANY
Mn REPRO TAT S OF A
f f TREAT (REQUIRED R ONE T ONLY). a..EPA D 60 b> PA OD 60
.

4onuest
No.:
s
[
.,. ,. ,..� .. ..... .::. ... ... .. ..:. ...... � .....,....� ... ..,. A T i .,. L
5'
a v i A D ALE '.. i' : A x I N <(i , } ,. ' .' t A L p ie ✓
A
ac i l i tv Name:
UNOCAL 5OUTHEAST TERMINAL
Type CAE Waste:
1Oii% %E>EttUSE1A,I,�t_
Stream;
UT PAW CREEK
classification:Receiving
,.
,L6bb a, i 1
0308 Lv Drainage
area:
O 300 sq mi
i, . 4„i is.t m y
M E K L. E: N L, U R G Summer
i s4.:t l 13
0.00
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
Monthly Daily Monitor�
Average maximum
Fred
W, f 1'kow (kit d)
EF.i S 00I
tt i t i i ryt A,tA^ Grease °( }y a i t 4 111 ;t ('/} jjj 0 ('� i 7 0
v ,,;{III f( t) 0" k * u {„ k.
e �,�
solids i F7'
r 'r [f l i o
^�' t liar"
i - C
i . 4.2 i i L.Wr+w�m4nI
p H . i i.
k .. .«
t
;a,ro
Y
1.
s� 0
5 e
+ � t
Lead (�`.� 1rr 1.. l �
gym# 5
Toxicity fest 1 n;i E. q
Acute Da$ `1t1 I t{ 4a Ah
- V - .._ - .. „ V - , - _ - __ - _ - _...
_ . W ._ MONITORING -__. w._,-w_.. _m.
-#ipsti
amE V;'N M1 i1
Location: .`PT„2oPi;
Downstream A Y/N t 4N
z
Location:
_.:... ,.,
COMMENTS
RECOMMEND FLOW MONITORING
R 4i I E.M E N i. THE 4- jwACG E
SHALL
RECORD .HiAPOP0,
ENT SAMPLING. RECOMMEND t ijaiMENlam" EFFLUENT
WITH WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TEST
MIT. MONITORING SHOULD OCCUR AT 'r
TOXICITY *AMPLE IS TAKEN DURING THE DISCHARGE EVENT.
E.NE,.R CLAUSE IN PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITS ON THESI
SHOULD THE FACILITY FAIL IT WHOLE -EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTF
OF T H E FIRST DISCHARGE EVENT THE i E.. t. M I Y 1 E t, SHALL ALSO S U `_ A t 4
THEFOLLOWING ANALYSES.
,AE1St THESE ANALYSES SHALL BE PERFORMED ri
SAMPLE OF ,HE "4. tW TEo LiF,Uv,i DISCHARGE, TAKEN AFTER AN
UIRE.D („.CNE.. TIME UNLW a.LPA METHOD 601 b.EPA METHOD e
-----------------------------------------
mmended by:
i p e °Tit i o M ' 4 f
i.i E t : i' , ! ... r , i x .? it '��� ^'' G✓. � � --- r�C` �" nyineeriny
w
Q
TO 'LEwt:��;Pf E�,��iw LF. „f`Ii E .> B `,r r A i 196

Facility Nape
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT
Daphnid 48 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
The pertnittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in
E.P.A. Document 600/4- 5/013 entitled "The Acute 'ioxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine C)rganisr s". The monitoring g shall beperfoirned as ti I>a f iat ilex or C'eriod phnia 4
hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -
monitoring purposes must be obtained below all wash treatment. Sampling and subsequent testing
will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective elate of this permit. After-
monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test annually, with the
annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement must be
performed and reported by June 30, If no discharge occurs by Jun ,30, notification will be made to
the Division by this dlate. Tonicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the
annual test requirement.
The parameter cede for this test if rising Daphnia pqlex is 'TAA3D. The parameter code for this test
if using Cerioda' hnia is TAr'�3E. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed., using the, appropriate parameter code. Additionally, ITEM Forna AT-1. (original) is to
be sent to the following address.
Attention. Technical Services Branch
N'orth Carolina Division of
Environmental Managernent
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C., 27 611
Test data shall be complete mid accurate and include all supporting chen-tic:al/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample roust be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests p rforined by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance pliance with monitoring requirements:
710 —__._ cfs
permitted Flow:«teMGD Reco imcli e'd by:
Basin & Sub -Basin .
Receiving Sri -ear _
County �e ? _ _ _.� �__.. : a t _ ._.._ �r.
**Acute Toxic ty(Daphnid 48 hr) Monitoring, 1, ISODIC, Stye Part __ Condition--,.--. dition;_—.__.

STAFF REPORT
1. a. Place visited: Union Oil
b. Mailing Address: 13 Corpc
Post Off
Atlanta,
2. Date of Investigation: 1/16/E
3. By: Michael L. Parker, Envirc
4. a. Person contacted: H. C.
b. Phone No.: 704/399-3371
5. Directions to site: Travel v
approximately 3.0 miles to tf
Holly Road)'® Turn right ont(
the right side of S. R. 1691
Highway 27.
6. a. The coordinates to the ex!
Latitude: 35016'08"
Longitude: 80056114"
b. USES Quad No.: F 15 SW
7. Size (land available for expar
RECOMMENDATIONS
Date of Report: 1/13/34
iental Engineering Tech. II
ihoy, Terininal Manager
7 komtz_ 6Ut*1\J
;t on Highway 27 from Charlotte
junction of S. R. 1691 (Old 'Mt.
3. R. 1691. Union Oil Company is on
)proximately 400 yards distance from
ting point of effluent discharge are:
� attached map)
avaiiaoie Tor tne operation OT one existing Taciiizies.
C. Topography: Sloping toward the receiving stream at 3-6%.
9Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet of the existing
treatment facilities.
10. Receiving Stream: Unnamed tributary to Paw Creek
a. Classification: "C"
b. Minimum 7-Day, 10-Year discharge at site: 0 cfs
c. River Basin and Sub -Basin No.: Catawba 03-08-34
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES
1. Existing Facilities: The existing treatment facilities currently
operated by the Union Oil Company consist of dual oil/water separators
which serve both Union and Gulf Oil. The wastewater generated at
this facility comes from runoff water that passes through the fuel
loading areas of the terminal prior to entering the oil/water separator.

Part III - �EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Page Two
1. Performance Evaluation: No water quality violations have been
recorded at this facility for the past twelve months. Self -monitoring
data indicate that this facility is in compliance with its Permit
limitations.
2. 0 & M Evaluation: The wastewater treatment facilities appeared to be
well operated and maintained during the site investigation. No
visible oil sheen was observed in or around the point of discharge.
This facility's discharge is intermittent in nature.
3. Recommendations and/or Special Conditions: It is recommended that
the NPDES Permit for this facility be renewed.

ka
loll
.. w c ` .
a m
S•
y x +
m �� • as
*
� capon,
4 TV
�
Ra
f
�
y
a
� w
n C
M
a
p
All
PZ
f

�orth Carolina Department of Natural
I I
James B. Hunt, Jr,, Governor Joseph W. GrirnsPey, Secretary TeWphone 9 19 733-701!
December 27, 1983
Mr. L. P. Bates
Union Oil Company of California
13 Corporate Square, NE
'M
P. C. Box 4147 A
Atlanta, Georgia i802 ubject: Application for NPDES Perinit No.
NCO021971 pa
ts
Meckle C o un ty
nbur
Dear Mr. Bates
Receipt of the followincement s is hereby acknowledgedr
cation Form
nginee ring Proposal (for Proposed control facilities)
X Request for permit renewal
-other
If any of the items listed below are checked, the application received is
lication Form (copies enclosed)
ineering Proposal (See (b) 1-5 on attached)
er
pplication is not made complete within thirty (30) days, it will be
to you and may be resubmitted when complete,,
s application has been assic ,rned to Ms. Hel c a n
,t is drafted, pdblic
ot�' any comments, tern mm-ndations, questions or other information i
review of the application.
I arn, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional 0
'prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this dischar�
any questions regarding this application, please contact the revi�
above .
Sincerely,
William C. Mills, Supervis�
Permits and Engineering Uri.
ccjjOSWjj Regional Supervisor
e en S. Fowlei
POLL UTION PRE VENTION P.4 YS
,0,&,,,76,137 rkaleigh,N C,27611-'.'687
,art E qual Opporrunlry A ffirmatIve A tian Emph°er

Union 76 Division" Eastern Region
Union Oil Company of California
13 Corporate Square, N,E.
P,O. Box 4147, Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Telephone [phone]
e 0
unt7on
W.E. Herchfine November 30, 1983
Dwisw D�stribulion Manager, M�anta
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources & Community Development
P. C. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 17611
Attention: Water Quality Department
RE: NPDES PERMIT #0021971
CHARLOTTE, N. C.
Gentlemen:
The subject NPDES Permit expires on June 30, 1984.
Would you please send us the necessary applications
for renewal of this permit.
Yours very truly,
L. P. Bates
Environmental Supervisor
LPB:fem
F.
10,63

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
VIP
I
)n Oil Company
.n a ;ro..ina ana, the u. 6. r;
per 6, 1983.
.his discharge.
i ga N'
ENVIRONMENTAL
MENTAL
ient of al MANAGEMENT
Robert F. Helms
Development Director
ctor
times A. Summers, Secretary Telephone [phone]
per 14, 198
v�
ti
ct: Permit No. NCO021971
Paw Creek
Mecklenburg; County
for discharge Permit received
with the subject State.- ICES
* the requirements of North
e Memorandum of Agreement
ronmental Protection agency
.tions contained in this Permit
ht to an adjudicatory hearing
and is the Director within 30
entifying the specific issues to
this Permit shall be final and
s S. Finan, telephone [phone].
Sincerely yours,
Robert F. Helms
Director
fr. Jim Patrick, FPS
P 0, Box 27687 Raieigh, N 27611-7 87
An Ec uai tµ c+0cr inity, -Affifmative Action E oioy r

Permit No., 14C 0021971
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
P E R M I T
To Discharge Wastewater Under the NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other l wfuli standards and regulations promulgated and adonted hv Cho un'"t-h
amended,
Union Oil Company of Q
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater frc
NCSR 1691
Mecklenburg Couni
f ornia
y to Paw Creek in the Ca
►5
--- u.Lsuadrge snail expire at midnight
31, 1989
this day of December 14, 1984
V)r
2
All L
Robert F. Helms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental
Management Commission

Permit No. NCO0 1971
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Union Oil Company
hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate dual ail/water separators located at Thrift
can N SR 1691 in Mecklenburg County, and

areas, loading/unloading areas, etc. suc" u1su"otu— j"U11
permittee as specified below:
D i s c h Lg e LL i m, i t a tt it oun 5 MonitoriLlg_�equi ments,
Effluent Characteristic
Me as ureme it
it Spec) jyj dyllis Id firer Un1-1—ScLS I�e
AMOCO lypt
Rally a
aLAy_. )ail Max. Daily -Pin
'i _IYAI x.
2/Month Estimate
Flow (not to exceed) 30 mg/l 60 mq/I 2/Month Grab
()i Grease
*Monitoring will be conducted during normal working hours.
rhis permit imposes no limitation on the discharge of stormwater runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial
activity and not discharged through any oil -water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
at the following location(s):
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken
The nearest accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharo
ge to r mixing with We receiving waters
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units and shall be monitored 2/Month
at the effluent by grab sample.

Part'
Pemit
SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE

Act used herein mear
Fmmi ss on".
BRING AND REPORTING
�presentative Sampling
Reporting
of Environmental Management
1 ty Section
ce Box2767
North Carolina 27611
I
PART
Permit No. NO
previous month('
re "daily maximum" discharge mans the total discharge b
rring any calendar day.
'rocedures
)rocedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform
itions published pursuant to N. C. G. S. 143216»63 et s+
and Air Quality Reporting Act, Section 4 g ;, 13 USC 1!1
it Water Pollution Control Act, As Amended, and Regglati
ling Results
ich measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requi rem;
�ermit, the permitted shall record the following informa

a.
The
exact place, date, and
b.
The
dates the analyses wer
c.
The
persons he performe
d.
The
analytical techniques
e.
The
results of all require
. Additional Monitoring by Permi;
If
the
perms ttee monitors any
^ds Retention
Environmentai Protection Agency.
sampl i ng;
id a
ilyses
is used, and
' .
PART I
Permit No. 1 C

A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
1. Change in Discharge
All discharges authorized h
conditions of this permit.
in this permit more frequent
authorized shall constitute
nplianoo Notification
h condition:
description of the dis
;ion
PART
Permi t No. NC
i be consistent with the terms and
rgo of any pollutant identified
r at a level in excess ofthat
a does not comply with or will be unable
and conditions of this pewit.
pact
tee shall take all reasonable sups to minim
iiT.aT.ions; sp czriao in rnis permit, inctooing socn acc rora oo or
itihnal monitoring as necessary to determine the nature and impact o
r noncomplying discharge.
gassing
t diversion from or bypass of facilities necessary to maintain c mpli
:h the tours and conditions of this permit is prohibited, except i

PART I I
unavoidable to prevent lass
ii)where excessive storm dr
facilities necessary for comp
and prohibitions of this perm
notify the Water Quality Sect
diversion or bypass'.
. Removed Substances
Failures
Permit No. NC
�r severe property damage, or
Mr runoff would damage any
iith the effluent limitations
prmittee shall promptly
)EM in writing of each such
control facilities,
alternative power source is not in existence
entation appears in Part ,
I M z A,_.
ties.
Offshore Construction
work.' in any navigable waters.

PART 11
Permit No. N
B. RESPONSIBILITIEJ
. Right of Erg try
The permittee shall allow th., r
Management the k r i r a i Admnini
il:
where an effluent source i
juiced to be kept under the
id
b. At rea!;nnable times tod
to be Wit un,,I r the e
Of RepArts
the ' , Act,
Mod ifi cat", o*n,
notice kinilk,y f r a hearing pursuant to I. C.
b 2and x. S. 4,1­r;.I(e) respectively, this permit
d, ljsp df,, J , o revokfd in whole or in part daring i
i lu i c., w ut ,,t limit.>d to, the following:
lation of any t;nis or conditions of this permit; ;
i i th-" s -' i t by ni rp es nt tin or failure t'
ly ,te a an l-' ficts , or
..hange in any candllrin that requires either a temporar
rmanent r° duc ,io or Plfi-xInatlon of the u h d disc

5. Toxic Pollutants
'i d.
Liability
hts
FART I
Permit N. IBC
if a toxic effluent standard or
ors f' this Dermit are severable, and if
the application of any provision of this
cY 9 A 41 .f .i: s

PART
Perini
. Expiration n ! Permit

Previous Permits
All previous State '�N
whether for construe
by issuance of this
orovi ions of this
Ater quality
*ion or opera'
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
facility.
C. Construction
o construction; of wastewater treatmei
D. Certified Operator
ra„v-ct,�%nt n chanter 90A of North Caroli
ter treatment facilities.
irents
Permit No. NC 0021971
issued to this facility,
discharge, are hereby revoked
ns, requirements, terins, and
charge under the National
verns discharges from this
aci 1 ti s or additions thereto
`J t.ru 411 V11 eau 4."AJ:E ,do-
accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth
exceeds 30 mg l ; or
b. The analyses of any two representative grab samples;t=
the State at least six () hours apart during any con;
thirty (30) dayperiods each individually exceed 3 ' m+
Each sample taken by either the permittde or the State sh
presumed to be representative. however, due to the vari a'
the sampling and analysis of 'oil and grease discharge fro
marketing terminals, the permittee may in good faith decl
of 10110 of the samples taken by it during a calendar year,
more than one sample taken during any calendar month, to
representative.

4 e
No sample may be so excluded if
permittee during a calendar moni
n writing with the next Di s cha
accordance with Part I., C., 2.
results of the analysis of the
explanation for the exclusion o
excluded, the "daily 'average"
average of the analyses of the
2. The "dai ly maximum" l imi tati on
A. shall be deemed to have been
a. The arithmetic average of t
samples taken during a calf
this State (a minimum of tvi
apart) in accordance with t
above exceeds 60 mg/1 or
b. The analysis of a single sc
during the day by the perm!
Each sample taken by either th(
to be representative. However
and analysis of oil and grease
terminals, the permittee may it
of the samples taken by it dur°
0021971
the only +sample taken by the
-h a declaration must be included
i tori ng Report submitted in
s permit, and must ;include the
d sample, and a written
sample. If any sample is so
ation shall be the 'arithmetic
ng non -excluded samples.
and grease stated in Part 1.,
ed if either:
yses of all representative
y by the permittee or by
es 'taken at mast six hours
torng requirements set forth
,hen it is the only one taken
xceeds 60 mg/l.
yes of the remaining non -excluded samples.
of meeting this "daily maximum" limitations as stated above,
of their facilities. 'cannot be so equipped to meet this limitat
s stated above. If the permittee can present su-ficient evid
demonstrate that this facility cannot be so equipped, the 5tat
modify this limitation to the extent needed (in no case to exc
100 g/1) to assure' reasonable compliance with the "daily maxi
limitation.

3. It is recognized that influent qua
or ether circumstances may sometim{
exceeding the permit limitations d
care and maintenance measures, and
The permittee may come forward to
circumstances exist in any case wh
those set forth in this permit. T
information in determining approp
to e taken.
4. A calendar day is defined as any co'
5. The "daily maximum" concentration i
of one or more representative grab
day. Should effluent sampling be d
during the month, the arithmetic a
maximum" concentrations shall be re
Monitoring Report Form.
.
. Collection of representative sample
of discharges. Should there be no
hours, the Rermittee shall' report
period.
7. The reported flow shall be the aria
discharged on each of the sampling
Flow may be calculated utilizing a'
other similar device.
. In connection with submission of r
changes,; equipment malfunction,
?suit in effluent concentrations
we the exercise of appropriate
^ecti ve measures by the permi ttee.
istrate to the State that such
affluent concentrations exceed
tate will consider such
enforcement measures, if any,
cuti ve 24-hour period.
eied as the arithmetic average
pies taken during any calendar
on more than one calendar day
ge vindicating the largest "daily
ed on the N. C. Discharge

PERM Ii
To Discharge Wastewater Uz
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELI1
Union Oil Company of
NCSR is
Mecklenburg
rs designated an unnamed
Permit No ° NC 0021971
MINA
)MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A GEM N"
the NATIONAL
LION SYSTEM
a Farts I, II, and III hereof.
become effective
Lia
day of
Robert F . �Helms, Direoto:
Division of Environmental Mangy
By Authority of the Enviro
Management Commission

SUPPLEMENT TO'PERMIT
Union Oil Co
hereby; authorized to:
Permit No. NCO021971
SHEET
gyrators located at Thrift
3
Pace Creek which is classified Class " " waters.

ionitoring by the
Pisharge Limitations Mon i tori rigj�e ( to ewe"LS
Effluent Characteristic �
Sall
Other Units(Speci Measurement __illle
"I'Lat �IbsLd�) y LLe
- �rue _� �c
Daily pai I y_jjax.
Daily 4ax. 2/flonth Estimate
How
(not to exceed) 30 mg/l 60 mg/l 2/Month Grab
Oil Grease
*Monitoring will be conducted during normal working hours.
This permit imposes no limitatiou on the discharge of stonilwater runoff uncontaminated by any iacndusilitytrial or comiiiercial
activity and not discharged through any oil -water separator or other treatment equipment or f.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at e fole lowitig I loca ti on
�,
' Thenearest accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or Illixing withth threceiving watul,
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units and shall be monitored 2/Month
at the effluent by grab sample.

Previous Permits
i
...... .....
peror
cents
averade" limitations fo
it
tative.
PerMi t NO. NC 0021971
sued to this facility,
ischarge, are hereby revoked
s , requirements, terms, and
harge under the National
erns discharges from this
Lcilities or additions thereto
fications have been submitted
it and written approval and
L If no objections to Final
the OEM after 30 days following
)ermit,wnicnever 1
ttn authorized.
General Statutes, the permittee�_

0021,971
No sample may be so excluded if it is the only sample taken by the
permittee during a calendar month. Such a declaration must be included
in writing with the next Discharge Monitoring- Report submitted in
accordance with Part I., C. , 2. of this permit, and :rust include the
results of the analysis of the excluded sample, and a written
explanation for the exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so
excluded, the "daily average" concentration shall be the arithmetic
average of she analyses of the remaining non -excluded samples.
. The "dal ly -maximum" , i mi ati on nor oil and grease stated in Part i .
A. shall be deemed to have been exceeded if either:
a The arithmetic average of the analyses of all representative
samples taken during a calendar day by the permittee or by
this State (a minimum of two samples taken at least six hogs
apart) in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth
above exceeds 60 mg/l; or
b. The analysis of a single sample (when it is the only one taken
during the day by the permittee) exceeds 60 mg/l.
Each simple taken by either the permittee or the State shall be presumed
- ^ Ka ranrocAntAt; vA Hnwpvpr. due to the vari abi l itv - of the sampling
M M
•
=um company officials have contended that,
oodi fy this limitation to the extent needed (in o ease to exceed
00 mg/1) to assure reasonable compliance with the "-daily maximum"

3. It is recognized that influent quality changes, equipment Baalf
or other circumstances may sometimes result in effluent concert
exceeding the permit limitations despite the exercise of apprc
care and maintenance measures, and corrective measures by the
The permittee may come forward to demonstrate to the State thz
circumstances exist in any case where effluent concentrations
those set forth in this permit. The State wi1l consider such
information in determining appropriate enforcement measures, i
to be taken.
4. A calendar day is defined as any consecutive 24-hour period.
5. The "daily maximum" concentration is defined as the arithmetic
of one or more representative grab samples taken during any cz
day. Should effluent sampling be done on more than one calenc
during the month, the arithmetic average indicating the larges
maximum" concentrations shall be reported on the N. C. Dischar
Monitoring Report Form.
6. Collection of representative samples shall be required during
of (Hqrh;;rnwZ 1;hmild thprp ha nn diqrhArmo Hitrinn nnrtn;41 tany
a Fifth Amendment of the United StatEsConstitution.

Page of
Permit No. N
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET'
Union Oil Company
Eri zed to

x - .. f iwUjf {74KLJd urnontia Estimate
Oil & Grease not to 60 mg/l 1/month Grab
exceed
GG mg/1
This permit imposes no limitation on the discharge of storewater ;runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or c mncrcial
activity and not discharged through any oil -water separator or other treatment equipment ent or facility.
samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements; specified above shall be taken at the following location( :
The nearest accessible point After Final treatment but prior to actualdischarge to or mixing with the receiving graters.
C7

Part I
Permit No. NC
10
I OF COMPLIANCE
! permittee shall achieve compliance with the effluent limitations
Edified for discharges in accordance with the following schedule:
"It F
NOT

PARS` 1 T
Page of
Permit No. NC
d.
s
s
Construction
in any navigable waters.

PART II
Permit N
NSI ILITIES
ight of Entry
ct a L.Iurls VI Wilt pr1111 t i allu
oralAct.'
3ti n
nanent reduction or elimination of the a th ri

x
n

B. Previous Permits
?n
>rat - Not Apf
ie wastewater treatment facilities.
PART I I I
Page of
Permit . NC
Issued to this facility.

Permit No. N
STATE OF NOP
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES R{
DIVISION OF ENVIRCiN
PER+
To DischargeWast wat
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
IS set ft oath in Parts 1,` 1, - n
lA
J3ITY DEVELOPMENT
iE.ET
NATIONAL
)N SYSTEM
11 hers`.
his par i t and the authorization to discharge a`i i expire at mi ni
i 'ned this day o
A. F. McR ri e, Director
Division of Environmental wane
By Authority of the Envi ranm-a
Manag mangy Commission
l

During tine period beginning the eff-e:ctive date and lasting through the term of this permit,
the permittee is authorized to discharge storm water and contaminated wastewater originating from
point sources including, but not limited to, bulk storage tank areas;, product :transfer areas,
loading/unloading areas, etc. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee a
specified below:
Effluent Characteristic gischar e limitations Monitoring Requirements
k' /da lbs/ Other Units ecif Measurement
Ere uen,� T
i 1 Aycy DailyDaily Av Hai l Max,
Floe-m3/Day (MGD) 1/month Estimate
Gil & Grease net to 60 mg/l 1/monthGrab
exceed
30 mg/l
This permit imposes no limitation on the discharge of stor wat r runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial
activity and not discharged through any oil water separator or ether treatment equipment or facility.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s):
The nearest accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.

STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- INSPECTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE
1. Place visited: Union 1 1 r0l;iocil."
Thrift
Mecklenburg County
2. Date. June, 1970 µ{
. y: David>T. Adkins, gaiter K. Evans
4. Person contacted; James Sligh, Terminal Manager for Union Oil
5 16' and W 80056'.
e: There is adequate area for the continue
ility.
ion of nearest dwelling: None within 500'
ving Stream: Unnamed tributary to Paw Cr
Classification: "C'°
�. r.. 4' ! •r•
e • � � � aid t
x
WORKS
!retinal serving both Union Oil and Gulf Oil.
- EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
e final effluent limitations are the ones used by Reg
vironmental Protection Agency in modifying an NPDES P
fisting oil terminal in the same area.
is recommended that NPDES Permit No. CSC 0021971 be re
riod of five years.

¢A L'U' i J,iN C,1, . 4.,5 ,+tii iS k.. �, L!:i ; T i�P � 1 ON �i S I f..1'
r• x ^tw.T:i f�"� Ftejkt t,„p>
Ac. EI
USE VIIAIE RECEIVED
ly by services, wholesale and retail trade,
� ^<^vw
in:lu(I7ng s`-�sseia
... Ma. a
YEAR; MO. DAY
to complete this form without reading the accompanying instructions
'lease :rant or type
ss, and telephone number of facility producing discharge
A. game Union Oil Co. of California. Southeast Termiaalq, Divisiba
8� Street address 7401 Old lel . Holly Road
cite h one
D. state —Y rt _ Carolina
E. county 1-le letaber
� F. ZtP 13€�
G, Telephone No. 0-�3371
Area
Code
blank)
npl oyees 6
Storage of petroleum products'
s.ness
ire if discharge occurs all yearX or
ie; moath(s) discharge occurs:
1. ra ,lanuary 2> a February 3. r-3 March 4. Q Apri 1
5. 0 May
6.0 .Tune 7. 0 vault' 8. 0 August 9.o September
M 0 October
11. 0 November 12. o December
days per week
1. a 1 2.02-3 3. 4-5 4,0-7
ste water discharged to surface waters only (check as applicable)
Flow, gallons per operating day
Volume treated before
discharging (percent)
e per
�
g day 0.1-999 1000-4999 5 00-9999
10,000• .50,000
None 0.1- 3o- 65- 95-
49,999
or more 29.9 64.9 94�9 100
(1) (2) (3)
(4)
(5) (6) (7) (3)" (9) (10)
lily
tr, etc.,
a er
'hw^
t:� e4 i��.t oa.
C -j E i r F e d: {{y#i
q'qYY
types
Average , anneal rainfall
43.43 inches
'w�A_AG LG4LVi CrC�»V aceats{,nwn
..v -------
i
1 -7 3 30,000 sq.
ft.
i

lines A,
Lyp�n of waste id; 4i f i ad in item 6 / e i th,
fisr:h,irqed to ;)I other than surface Wa
or on -
below
dischar(jed to: 0,1_999 1000-4
lj (2:
or system
ell
agoon or pond
Y:
irate discharge points:
B. o 2-3 C.o 4-5 D. o 6 or more
wing water or waters ._..,Pj99h — Unriaml
I
,change contain or is it possible for your
�opper, lead, mercury, nickel, seleniur;
tic
5o6o-9999 10,000-49,999 50,000 C
(4) (5
,ge to contain
,our operations,
fa, cadmium,
Is, oil and
391MILIFTMAME AM
st of rly knowledoe and belief such information is true, complete, and
Stewart,;
f Person Signing
Vice President
Title
7 3-
on Signed/
Signature of Applicant
:M 1001wovides that.
7Y Matter 10 thin the jurislictionof iny ilcy)art.,nent or akencyof the (jtntedStates
v-"Ift;IIY falsities, c0nct-Ws, of covers up by any trick, scheme, or deiice a
rmrakes any tytse, tichtioj:s, or fraticb1m.t state rxrts of rcgaresc Cations„ or
n�' InI,7e writing', or 4-icuintyiI knOtV1110 S-rne to contain any foL7e. fjctitious, or
-nftlt Or entry, ShIIII be fined not more thrt 11f),000 or irnpri son ed riot more
60 th,