20060942 Ver 1_Complete File_20060705

O?O? \ NAT ?
6 5 , 1.V:o

O \ii? `C
? k4Onnnn
I D
wFr?NDSgNOSrgrFRa? ?0??
°RMwq? e
'Cy
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
July 5, 2006
Harnett County
DWQ Project No. 060942
SR 2024, Covington Road
State Project No. 6C.043017
APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Terry R. Gibson, Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 6
P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28302
Dear Mr. Gibson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
implementing roadway improvements to SR 2024 in Harnett County:
Stream Impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin
Site Permanent Fill Temporary Fill in Permanent Fill in Temporary Fill Total Stream Stream
in Intermittent Intermittent Perennial Stream in Perennial Impact Impacts
Crossing Stream Stream (linear ft) (linear ft) Stream (linear ft) (linear ft) Requiring
# (linear ft) Mitigation
linear ft
1 20 LF, 24" RCP 20 LF
2 20 LF, 24" CMP 20 LF
3 20 LF, 18" RCP 20 LF
4 20 LF, 18" RCP 20 LF
5 10 LF, (2) 24" 10 LF
CMP
6 20 LF, 30" RCP 20 LF
Total 80 LF 30 LF 110 LF
Total Stream Impact for Project: 110 linear feet.
NonehCaro tna
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street - Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: ncwaterquality.org FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Terry R. Gibson
July 5, 2006
Page 2
Wetland Impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin (non-riverine)
Site Fill
(ac) Fill
(temporary)
(ac) Excavation
(ac) Mechanized
Clearing (ac) Hand
Clearing
ac Area under
Bridge
ac Total Wetland
Impact (ac)
1 0.063 0.063
2 0.011 0.011
3 0.0014 0.0014
4 0.017* 0.017
5 0.021 0.021
Total 0.1134 0.1134
Total Wetland Impact for Project: 0.1134 acres.
*correction f om table on p.8 of PCN. This is consistent with application cover letter and project drawings.
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated May 30, 2006, received June 9, 2006. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number 3404. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition,
you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will
expire with the accompanying 404 permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should
your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions.
If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the
future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and
(7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the
following additional conditions.
Additional conditions
1) Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below the elevation of the
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for
culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may
result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if requested in writing by
DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction,
please contact the NC DWQ for guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will
be required.
2) If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing
concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be discharged to surface waters
due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
3) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers.
4) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified. Disturbed
floodplains and streams should be restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
Mr. i erry K. uit)son
July 5, 2006
Page 3
5) The use of rip-rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip-rap placed for stream stabilization
shall be placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage.
6) All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from the
most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms,
cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
7) Heavy equipment shall be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the introduction of other pollutants into the stream.
8) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
9) No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this
certification.
10) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is
prohibited.
11) The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other
appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met
(including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further
conditions are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification.
12) All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless otherwise
authorized by this certification.
13) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the Water
Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer and the on-
site project manager.
14) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this authorization
shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the
fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification.
15) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT Division Engineer shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification
of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed.
16) Native riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
17) There shall be no excavation from, or waste disposal into, jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this permit
without appropriate modification. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or streams, compensatory
mitigation will be required since that is a direct impact from road construction activities.
18) Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the
proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to
protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
Mr. Terry R. Gibson
July 5, 2006
Page 4
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be
such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow
sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
19) Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters unless otherwise approved by this
Certification. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be
removed and the natural grade restored upon completion of the project.
20) This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 federal permit. This condition supersedes condition No. 19 in
General Certification No. 3404.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter
completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please contact Ken Averitte at [phone].
Sincerely, l n ,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments (General Certification and Certificate of Completion form)
cc: Wilmington US Army Corp District Office
Jim Rerko, Division 6 Environmental Officer
Richard Spencer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Rob Ridings, 401 /Wetlands DOT Unit
FRO, DWQ
FRO, DLR
Central Files
File Copy
I famett.sr2024.doc
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY.
GOVERNOR
JUNE 6, 2006
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
John Hennessy
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Minor Road Crossings / SR 2024 / Harnett County
State Project # 6C.043017
USACOE NWP#14 / NCDENR WQC 3404
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
A%
?T o ??NO O(/`?
C9N? qN? ?L 1 v
tiosr TF?p 00, lY
LYNDO TIPP?P
SECRETARY Cy
Enclosed, please find seven (7) copies of a PCN and related documentation for a Minor Road
Crossing along SR 2024 (Covington Road) in Harnett County. The project will be completed in
compliance with NCDENR Division of Water Quality General Certification 3404, and, USACE
Nationwide Permit #14.
This project is being submitted under the 401 Automated Payment Procedure. The State
Project Number is 6C.043017 and, the permit fee is 2$ 00.00.
A separate copy of this submission has been forwarded to Ken Averitte of the Fayetteville
Regional Office.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this notification, please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely/ /
-James . Rerko, PWS
f Division 6 Environmental Officer
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1 1 50 - Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone]
f,
sU--
4Z-r??? ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
cc,le"- 00
tt`/VVV\\\1v?V?
Ntio°F'yR, 0.9 > 1
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TZ ?4? 00
MICHAEL F. EASLEY W. LYNT E T
GOVERNOR SECRET%
4
May 30, 2006

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for a Nationwide Permit 14 (Minor Road Crossing)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3404
Culvert Replacement: SR-2024 (Covington Rd.) Harnett County
State Project Number: 6C.043017
0609.4 The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has scheduled to clear, grade, drain,
base and pave SR-2024 (Covington Rd.) in Harnett County. Total project length is 3.57 miles.
The roadway will be widened from 16 feet to 20 feet and stabilized grass shoulders (6 foot) will
be provided.
Crossing Roadway Station Existing Culvert Extension/Re lace.
Crossing #1 Sta. 31+50 24 LF 24" RCP 20 LF
Crossing # 2 Sta. 46+30 24 LF 24" RCP 20 LF
Crossing # 3 Sta. 51+20 32 LF 18" RCP 20 LF
Crossing # 4 Sta. 66+18 24 LF 18" RCP 20 LF
Crossing # 5 Sta. 87+06 2 40 LF 24" CMP 2 50 LF 24" CMP
Crossing # 6 Sta. 71+92 24 LF 30" RCP 20 LF
New Stream Impacts = 110 linear feet
Wetland Roadway Station Wetland Impact
Wetland #1 Sta. 19+00-23+00 0.06 Ac.
Wetland #2 Sta. 31+30-32+40 0.011 Ac.
Wetland #3 Sta. 86+75-86+95 0.001 Ac.
Wetland #4 Sta. 71+00-73+00 0.017 Ac.
Wetland # 5 Sta. 64+15-65+60 0.021 Ac.
Total Wetland Impacts = 0.114Ac.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]

Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Cape Fear
River Basin. Crossings #1-5 will convey drainage to an UT to the Lower Little River (Class C).
Crossing #6 will convey drainage to an UT to the Upper Little River (WS-IV). The project is
located within the 03030004 Hydrologic Unit. The Lower Little River is classified as 303(d)
water, located in the subbasin 03-06-14 with an assessment unit of (18-23-24). This area has a
standard violation of low pH, with an unknown source.
A wetland area was identified between Sta. 19+00 and 23+00. Hydrology was observed along
with secondary indicators. Prior to the wetland delineation drought like conditions have occurred.
Red Maple, Sweetgum, and Loblolly Pine dominated this area. Nahunta soil (somewhat poorly
drained, moderately permeable) typically found on broad flats and in shallow Coastal Plain
depressions, was mapped in this area according to Harnett County Soil Survey (MRCS).
The mapped profile was a good match for the described soil unit.
Wetland #1 consists of approximately 2781.88 ft' (0.064Ac.), which is very close to the 60 foot
Right-of-way.
Crossing #1 conveys drainage collected from a forested wetland. Hydrology was noted at the
entrance and the exit. As part of this proposal, the existing 24 LF 24" RCP will be retained and
extended to 44 LF. This channel is perennial with a bottom width of two feet. Spoil sidecast
material was noted along the downstream side of the culvert. During construction spoil material
will be removed and the previous grade established. This will greatly reduce the amount of
sedimentation entering the channel an increase the aesthetic value of the UT to the Lower Little
Creek.
Wetland #2 was identified along the upstream side of the culvert. Typical Red Maple and
Sweetgum dominated the area along with Giant cane. Hydrology was noted along with secondary
indicators. Minimum impacts are expected: approximately 485.37 ftZ (0.011 Ac.)
Crossing #2 picks up drainage collected from a forested wetland. Hydrology was noted at the
culvert entrance and exit. Sidecast material was also observed on the downstream side. The
channel is intermittent with a bottom width of 3 (three) feet. The existing 24 LF 24" CMP will be
retained and extended to 44 LF.
Crossing #3 conveys drainage collected from a forested wetland area. Hydrology was noted at
the culvert entrance and the exit. Sidecast material was also noted on the downstream side. The
channel is intermittent in nature with a bottom width of 3 (three) feet. The existing 32 LF 18"
RCP will be retained and extended to 52 LF.
Crossing #4 conveys drainage collected from a forested wetland area. Hydrology was noted at
the culvert entrance and the exit. Sidecast material was also noted on the downstream side. The
channel is intermittent in nature with a bottom width of 4-feet. The existing culvert 24 LF 18"
RCP will be retained and extended to 44 LF. In addition to the work described, spoil sidecast on
the upstream and downstream will be removed. The previous grade established in order to reduce
sedimentation and increase the aesthetic value of the UT to the Lower Little River.
Wetland #3 was identified along the upstream side of the culvert. Red maple and Sweetgum
dominated the shrub stratum. These species have been repeatedly mowed due to an overhead
utility. Nahunta soil was also mapped along this area and was close match for NRCS soil profile
description. Minimum impacts are expected: approximately 61.46ft2 (0.0014 Ac.)
Crossing #5 conveys drainage collected from a forested wetland area. Hydrology was noted at
the culvert entrance and the exit. Sidecast material was also noted on the downstream side. The
channel is perennial in nature with a bottom width of 4-feet. The existing culvert (2) 40 LF 24"
CMP will be removed and replaced with (2) 50 LF 24". The culvert outlets will incorporate a 90°
elbow in order to divert flows with out compromising stream impacts. This design should reduce
erosion as well as channel the stream flow along the original path. During construction, the spoil
sidecast material will be removed and the previous grade established. This will open up available
flow area, as well as reduce the amount of sedimentation from entering the channel.
Wetland #4 was identified along the NCDOT right-of-way. Hydrology and secondary indicators
were noted. This stratum was dominated by Red Maples, along with a small number of
Sweetgum. Nahunta soils where mapped in this area and was a close match for soil profile.
Minimum impacts are expected: 722.202 (0.017 Ac.)
Wetland #5 was identified along the upstream side of the culvert. Hydrology and secondary
indicators were noted. This stratum was dominated by Red Maples, along with a small number
of Sweetgum. Nahunta soils where mapped in this area and was a close match for soil profile.
Minimum impacts are expected: 924.4ft2 (0.021 Ac.)
Crossing #6 conveys drainage collected from a forested area. The channel is perinnial with a
bottom width of 2 feet. Sidecast spoil material from previous cleanouts was noted on both the
upstream and the downstream side. The 24 LF 30" RCP will be retained and extended to 44 LF.
During construction spoil material will be removed and previous grades established. This will
reduce potential sediment deposits and greatly enhance the aesthetics.
RESOURCESTATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of culvert replacement along SR-
2024 (Covington Rd.) in Harnett County. One hundred ten (110) linear feet of stream impacts are
expected along with 0.114 Acres of Jurisdictional Wetlands within the NCDOT right-of-way. A
Nationwide Permit #14/ NCDENR 401 WQC 3404 is required for the project.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
lists four federally protected species for Harnett County.
Federally Protected Species for Harnett County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Notropis Mekistocholas Cape Fear Shiner E
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Isotria medeoloides Small-Whorled pogonia T
Lysimachia asperulaefolia Rough-leaved
loosestrife E
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A)
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sumac E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the May 23, 2006
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 / NCDENR 401
WQC 3404 as required by the above-described activities.
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed are the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while
accommodating the 25-year design storm. There is no record within the NCDOT District 2
Office (Harnett County) that the road experiences floods overtopping. By utilizing the erosion
control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMP's
will be utilized during construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].
Sincerely,
ames . Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Ken Averitte, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Ray Stone, P.E., District Engineer
Keith L. Anderson, County Maintenance Engineer
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 U 6 U 9 4 2
(If anv particular item is not annlicable to this moiect. please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Terrv R. Gibson, P.E./NCDOT/Div 6/Division Enzineer
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910-486-1493 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: tgibson( )dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: James J. Rerko, PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT/DIV 6/Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Same
Telephone Number: 910-437-0208 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: jirerkoAdot.state.nc.us
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR-2024 (Covington Rd.)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 6C.043017
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Erwin
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Hwy. 217 North, to SR-2027
(Horseshoe Bend Rd). turn left. Travel 500+1- feet; turn rieht on to SR-2024 (Covington
)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Crossing #1 (35°14'52"N 78°44'16"W),
Crossing #2 (35°17'04"N 78°44'16"W), Crossine #3 (35°17'08"N 78°44'20"W
Crossing #4 (35°17'19"N 78°44'31"W) Crossing #5 (35°1'40"N 78°44'34"W
Crossing #6 (35°18'58"N 78°44'37"W)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 25.98 acres
Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Lower Little River (C), and Upper
Little River (WS-IV)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 12
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing 20 foot gravel/dirt road with maintenance limits
60 foot in width. Surrounding land use is rural/forested.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: In
bringing SR-2024 up to current safety standards, i.e. 20 foot paving w/6 foot stabilized
shoulders and 3:1 side slopes within a 60 foot right-of-way. The existing culverts are
severely deteriorated with corrosion and must be replaced. Impacts will be minimized
as much as possible. The culverts will be replaced utilizing a track-hoe excavator. While
front end loaders will place fill material. Eventually a motor grader will finish grade the
protect prior to paving.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: By Statue, NCDOT is required to pave all
unpaved Secondary Roads. To ensure that the roadway meets current safety standards,
the road will be paved to a width of 20 feet, 6 foot grass shoulders will be installed on
each side and 3:1 side slopes will be provided within the 60 foot right-of-way.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Reviewed by Richard Spencer (COE) 05/23/06
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 7 of 12
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Remove and replace existing
culverts along SR-2024 (Covington Rd), which is necessary to provide the minimum
current safety standards.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number Area of Located within Distance to
(indicate on Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
ma
Wetland #1 Fill 0.063 No 500 LF Forested Wetland
Wetland #2 Fill 0.011 No 0 LF Forested Wetland
Wetland #3 Fill 0.0014 No 0 LF Forested Wetland
Wetland #4 Fill 0.0378 No 0 LF Forested Wetland
Wetland #5 Fill 0..021 No 0 LF Forested Wetland
3 List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.114 ac.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.114 ac.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
Length of
Average Width
Perennial or
(indicate on Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
ma
Crossing #1 Culvert 20 LF UT to Lower Little
River 2 ft. Perennial
Crossing #2 Culvert 20 LF UT to Lower Little 3 ft. Intermittent
River
Crossing #3 Culvert 20 LF UT to Lower Little 3 ft. Intermittent
River
Crossing #4 Culvert 20 LF UT to Lower Little 4 ft. Intermittent
River
Crossing #5 Culvert 10 LF UT to Lower Little 4 ft. Perennial
River
Crossing 46 Culvert 20 LF UT to Upper Little 2 ft. Intermittent
River
Page 8 of 12
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 110 Linear Feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any water of the U.S. below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name Waterbody
)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond estuary,
bay, ocean, etc, sound,
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The existing culverts are severely deteriorated and must be replaced.
VIII. Mitigation
Page 9 of 12
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation will be provided by EEP via quarterly report.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 Lf.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0 Ff.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 ac.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 ac.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 ac.
Page 10 of 12
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Yes ® No ?
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* 'Lone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
Additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
N/A
Xl. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan shall be incorporated into the Construction Plans
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
X [V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
s 30 Co
Applic t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
SR-2024 Covineton Rd. Harnett County.
SR-2024 (Covington Rd.) Harnett Cty.
N 5 3
1(
QJ ?zsl? ;?` - ro L6V Erwin • ' ti,
End Project ; L nR?'N^+ r. ,
Wetland #5 ; ..,??w, l,; ?l, / , ? 39W? n/'•I1 N
' i '? Crossing #6-35°18'58"N 78°44'37"W - ,
Wetland #4
all,
• Crossing #5--3501'40"N 78044'34"W
i Crossing #4--35-17'1 9N 78-144-31 W
?ea•c Wetland #3 s- ?,
Crossing #3--35017'08"N 78044'20"W
f r? . Crossing #2--35017'04"N 78044'16"W
Crossing #1--35014'52"N 78044'16"W
' Wetland #2 - 11 11
_ I Wetland #1
N / r u s; t
Begin Project r i
` +1.0 PF Ala r/ r. r 0M ?d
0 1 000 2 000 4,000
1:24,000

M
cD
O
O
n
U
v
Q
E
c
L_v
^T
W
L?
T
O
I-
•

.z
r

t
`
al
rf
s
d '

U
v
`
1 T
4-

f wl

? O
U

\ O
U +- 0-1
N 4-
4-
4-

N
(A f-
< 00 U
2 # (?6
4-
O
-v
X 4-
O
0 Q
_v
N
? L N
a a

Q
O
M
(O
O
O
O
0
0
N
O
N
It
O
C
CD
cu
N
O
N

IMAM L:??` 74
c,cp I a-Ad Aea
...6 zdl
DATA FORM 5t?
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: SIP-Zo24. (40,i,,o-„ Date:
Applicant / Owner: NC -DoT, County: rVeAk
Investigator: State: NC.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. it) b I? -P, tie- T, f)C 9.
2•'Re M41- T :ra (Vi ' 10.
3. Sux etav'wl 4 11.
4. Arnre'rA 0) -F?)c. - 12.
5. . S c, 13.
6. m.'- T. -I-lcu, 14.
7. 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
.- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
- Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
u'A Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name /
Q/
"
+°?
Drainage Class: ~ ?`?+ ?
Kill
7
(Series and Phase): -
J
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 1417fc 1=1 r Ir o /j Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10(g
0- A
-
?
I
/Z7 4
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor -
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?°G??++/t2.,?e ????' ?.?_ ?_n ,p .,. f:. o??Jt .1_.) rrFn ??1, ?,•,?

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ?? Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLANb DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
t ?JI(? ctI ji'J F
Project/Site:
ApplicantVOwner: NC DdT 'D,y•
Investigator:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No.
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
Date:
:t
County
State: A/c.
Community ID:
TransectlD:
Plot ID:
v cuc ? ,w r ??+?•
Plant Species
Dominant Stratum Indicator
f Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
/
1. Jk/c/1Tr,n? ?f ?AC 9. aa[ lK nr `-?• ?==
T--K kJ 10.
3. ^ /1) D _
Etc

11. ;y e horn w ?? l fie.
.
J

V ?
hqt!,
4. ,M ?
I S, ZA(ICI. 12-
*
?
S. ?)aC k Cluirq . C/..
C
T 14.
7. Wwlrk- ?
?

Percent of Dominant Species that areO8L, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).

Remarks: `Pri )w' 1 °T_rr2? 1
e ?G
7-1 1
ntunvl.vV r
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
t/Saturatad in Upper 12 Inches
_ Other
M'o Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
osits
nt De
di
S
p
me
e
-
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: -
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required),
Q idized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _
.Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: - (in.) _
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WA
IL
3-3
SOILS
Map Unit Name
l?7Q
a
? $oMC cJya/1t
: F0r/y C7r
i
j
D
Cl
?
C
-
(Series and Phase): /Y ra
nage
ass
oef
4r
Field Observations
M
d
l Y
N
%
?
'
g
S
Taxonomy (Subgroup):/)PG'/T7l o
Confirm
appe
Typa
es
PQ..
UGL-
T
?y/ (
Yl
- U
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance /Contrast Structure, etc.
AIr 311 le,
.
0ir )3

- 1- 1? "%
r7-12'" 2
/0?„" ? 7 4? l cf ?
1 I c `
1611r

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
yquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
eyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 'Ap. ?j 1&0 4. :.y ?/X LwY o/ °,l,1

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ? No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? a No
Hydric Soils Present? Ye No
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es No
Remarks:?
ooroveo ov HQUSACE Z(
3-4
r
1
1 00 J.
a
1

II 1
? f
U
m Q ?

?
t
I
?d
11 a Q"` A
o 03
?
•?
a Q
10
E
_0 d)
c
a
U ?

3 Q N
'--?
a co
(\j '
?.
+-)
o #
c II
a
a
N L?
3 Q
oh

30,E
Op

u
c
4-
U)
•X
TW
V Q
Cv
a)
}
x -{- }
w, c
-
dS N 4}
??
C -
•? C E
v
o = L
0?.
L a) +-
U Ir N C

Q
CO
b?
0
(D
0
0
N
0
N
O
C
(0
qq-
N
0
04
o
U
Cd
O ?
o 'S
H a
N
O
N w
o
U ?
Q? ? r ? N N
o
0
N
E
U
tU
CL
m
N
7
U
OM55 'lI-4-
DATA FORM r.p ?a^t 4,4,e,,
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: S,p 202 4, CcLfnk, 12a. Date: . 6, ZcXai,,
Applicant/ Owner: Nc • J)b-T County: ,/,L, ,c ¢f-
Investigator: State: Mc-
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
_j, No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ?_ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No---7'- Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1,0/400 Lqu,- -T_
\") - 9.
2.:Ne 10.
3. T t acr/ 11.
4. Srvee_ Fr?c+ 12.
5• e S, FA c- 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 10 0
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
,d(1 '4pe'?cs P.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
Saturated In Upper 12"
V --.'No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
PIA - Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: O (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: b (in - Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
!U/R. - Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: O (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
?'???
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: fir 11'1 61-f 0r' 'J'

Taxonomy (Subgroup): / Il«IrliC -0/' v
trj??S_ _ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No

Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moll 0 (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
4 loo, -113 S 1 el+M I9L. -
0
_
L iZtl 604r ?& Jni11?c1ccct (ktyrt.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol
Histic Epipedon -Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Solis List
-
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Solis List
_
-Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Av<wl?,VYM?i5'???cd ?c?e?d?o.nyv?,??q ca;?w?4w?.*'.arl??.??z?•?•

5°L;v pht•11 d" I `I(A- wA' 1 1 Y KC s? 63;-p U f -Y ?,p?i ?n • '
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes `_ No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes s No 7 Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Aimy Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
1NaS -?.?tys c-w t????R .?tvr??.. u,??ra.?«e-? ?rdti.?'r?fi?;`(-?•
V
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
6 ? (1--1ve 1 6'0S51 N?
Project/Site: 5e- 20 lp Date: ?O
Applicant%Owner: W- X77 _ County:
Investigator: State: f?G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? r? No. Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ' o
^ Transect ID:
`
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes " Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
. ??r+r-r w rn?i
VC%=1P%IIvrs
Dominant Plant Species
/
?' Stratum Indicator
FMW • Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
":?v 9r 'y_ fFAs-- ,
9.
1
aMr
1. 11 .1L_ i
h4d,41 e.
2. war S . ACf lo. - ; ?il/e_A s
r
?A rf''? ` l
3. it _ plc w - 1 1.
II
/`
4. 17-
J
5. S?'C-Ipcier?
to C +
13.
S 14.
7. 'FAC 15. _
8. ?reen ??riW Cdr. V . 1?:7&C 1 B.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
/ r(
(excluding FAC-).
marks flQr!' ;'ti tN? A?kCfPS
R Jane, i/I.PYL C aj C'?..1ti
e
OGY
rIYDROL
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-
_ Aerial Photographs In ndated
aturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
osits
t De
edi
p
men
_
j?
Feld Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - 0 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)

At,
P( fl L[ -r 5.' 6'
A
k
R
emar
s:
?1^ 'l CItL ,1m r(F

Jv '.I„?-
40C dlll?lj'f?
3-3

SOILS
Map Unit Name
L Sow;j/6

(Series and Phase): JO- +
Drainage Class: ay?(_Pcl
Q l

G
lk
J
I Feld Observations

rC r
lI IP
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
riy?
t Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mollie Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/0C, 3/j

r. R
1- Iz
/
U J "
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
?quic Moisture Regime 7-lis-ted on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
r/Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: a" t, ?o??jgl? ?X?<? ` f ?? ?,< <- r_, ? ?'? ,e >r. -.. ?° .

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? <2? No
Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks:
ovea by H
3-4

4
r

¦

2
Q
ti
77
N
ai
O
(D
O
O
N
OD
N
14,
O
C
co
d'
N
O
N
't3

o
U
O
O
4-a U
;b
3
H °
a

N
O
N w

0 -a
U ?
N

? ? N N
o3 O a?

j. ?

0

0
0
0
N
r
O
LO
O
C
E
n)
U
(0
CL
N
N
U

- -
r?
s
w
? ? <9^q ?' ? iv
%
C\i
/ 04-? a?
+-
uccS c
l? 'x
1
c? S
.t
l '' V
L
N
N
O
O
N
OD
N_
c
m
v
(0
qql
N
O
N
b
O
U
O
O 'd
C. b
o
0
H s?

N
O
N

N
kr)
O
M u
Z ?
zt-t

•?
N
M

• r-?I O O
00
U
a3 ?
O ?
a b
?

04
04
`°
0
N

O O
LO
O

O
4-j U

a

N
7
U
1
?uf
JA
r r .v t r
F

1 ?i _
y'r " •6
t- M

LIMA"

ooe

O
d

110,
01
/

? rr
?
/ -

/ w

C v
? Q.
v x O 4-
C

Q
°? N +-
i-

'to o E
U
O+- x a)
00 C
U w
Pr
6
r
r r
r
2
Q
O
ti
v
o>
O
O
O
O
N
co
N
IT

4J
o
U
O ?
O 'd
O .b
3 °
H o.
N
O
N ?
0
? w
O o 00
V •?
? r l N ?
CC3 `
i
c
? i
L
0
V
n
E
a)
U
N
CL
N
N
U

• •
?i
U
v
.v o
?o
vo
a
v ?
.? v
0 0.
E
M U
v
a N"
W}
c
a Q
0
z cA
a v
J
H
W
J Q
Q W
F- ?
Z Q
W 0
W
Z I-
0 U
L W
> L.L.
Z L.L.
W Q
Wiycn a
O
Li 3:
0 0 J o
S uj v o
(?0~ CC)

S
5
`
0
-
p0 J?Cr- ?
38 o
C
c)

?r
N
O
N
n

o
U
4-4
O

d
O

4-r 'd
U
'd
O
H ?
a

N
O
N

N

U
ct O

O
0 w
?

bA
? O

0

.'o
D
:V
A
D
C
D
N
U
f0
O.
N
C
U
. r' ,?.
tY„_b ti?• ? ?r ::r _ r! _
x
-?rz'r
• ? C'7?S,N? ?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: SR-202 L&I.4 4n? Date: 6 z
Applicant / Owner: NC Z)o= County: ",,,,v- F ?
Investigator: State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes_," No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No?
? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
C__ 9,
2._?c to o _._ 10.

4. V f 41 - 12.
5.?? SRp N . -r 13.
6. 14.
7• 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). G a
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Aerial Photographs
_ Other

No Recorded Data Available Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
Nlig _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _ In.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in,) - Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
n Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: ND ?-???vo .J t?,:•;-}rva?-? `1
SOILS
?Yl o??PV?- ?? /
Map Unit Name ( ?, Drainage Class: Viet( din QOQ1
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

C
S- 1... ?? i o mo b. c
I 2Z,, 7t ; c ? . a a
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol
Histlc Epipedon -Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Solis List
_
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks: Sod ?A u? , a? ?. P 1 J U^. ' i
46M
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes - No Within a Wetland? Yes_ No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes - No r/
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
'jv
w4J I c'-K
A4. l X0 n?q #'-
J ?.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: 5r1?- aOv?? . C;+?Uc} 1 ?t/c? ??yk1
A
- Date: Z?
?
pplicant/ Owner: _.f (
tA nT. (o County: 1-E
Investigator: State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No
/ Transact ID:
-
--y
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot I0:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Snecles Stratum Indicator
9.
2.° S :F-or 4- lo.
3• _V SAC 11.
4. I ?L TA-,- -_ 12.
N.I. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FA
C-
OBL in the
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
1
1
I
1't i hlri? J

HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other -,inundated

VN V_Saturated In Upper 12"
/
o Recorded Data Available Water Marks
',
Drift Lines
Field Observations: ,Sediment Deposits
_?Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. V ' \ (in•) Secondary Indicators:
?
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _ (] ` (in) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
-
Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: - ?? - (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
? 11
- ?N'• Pc OV?r" c irxlui t --?.
SOILS
Map Unit Name QQ(?
??C J? ie
`
?
Drainage Class:.
1
'
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): l /P'ml r f?-A j c q, ,Lj$ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description: Concretions,
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,

Horizon unsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(inches) LM

IZ + 5

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon - Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfldic Odor ____Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
-
Aquic Moisture Regime -/Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors =
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SAP V. R0/

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yes V No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
S' l?1c"'F'(i r2:tit0 .. ? , [ "w01revV'ri? N

v
a
W Q
a N
M 00
°o
Z n:
Q N N II
J N
~ ti U
W Q?' 3
0
J
Q LLLI F- cr-
Z Q
W
W
Z
O U
Lr W
> LL.
Z LL.
W Q
W
C\)
65 f 00 )
i
C,
Q
aD
N
00
N
00
O
CD
O
O
N
00
N
14-
O
C
CY)
x
I
N
O
NI

• j
fl }
U ? 1
v
? ? a

? ?
N
N
O
-A
x
a
co
N
00
N.
rn?
°
N o
O C
OND Z
D ?
-q Uj :70 C')
O
N
:70
3 R? ?o

i j
N k
u
o a
rn
. k

a j

D m
z
m
--'
-' o m z
-M
m
D z
M -H
M n
D f
m
W -+
to r
.? D
z
W (::)
(f) D
p X
m
-h D
\ u
a Cn
n
D
m
n
m
0
DT
N
m
D
11
Ln
m
LD
Ln
4
.o
-f,
0
n
y
O
O
C
CD
0
J
Q.
3
u
O
OO

;, f

o
U
O ?
O ^C3 ?
3 °
H a
N
O
N w
U ?
N
? O o
ct
a?
I a?
0
4-4
Q
OD
IR
O
0
CD
0
0
N
O
LO
O
C
CY)
a)
E
U
f0
CL
7
0

I , , ,

GIL)
DATA FORM 1`PJ°_-d
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: -R-2024 Cc? N? }an ?rj? , Date: 00.,n, (0 2cx)4,
Applicant/ Owner: NC ?-4- County: o ? m, -4-I-
Investigator• State: NC_
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No= Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Specles Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. ro .,par ,1 J + 9.
2• 10.
3. Ill.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
No Pl_ ..,4 - I
--, trr rr I -JJkr??r AEI'vIJ
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
!No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: N p Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Nl6 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: f4 A in. -- Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: i? IA (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ,
SOILS
(Y? v ?evo? e.E?
Map Unit Name X \ ?/?/e (? dro i n/eo) .
Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): X ?) l? I
Taxonomy (Subgroup):?MrmiC Q tt
l a tefAJ) I ?s Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
(inches) Horizon 1Munsell Moist) Texture, Concretions,
Mottle Colors Mottle
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, et
G
t3 1 ID T 5 to
/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_ Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor -
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
-Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Solis List
_ Reducing Conditions -
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: I - A CD?on? I P , 1cJ? rl? ? ?? ? l c? I fnl P- ? wc? <s :.?,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes - No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ? . Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
__O J-.?

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
v
Project/Site: S.0-20,24 (6ylwo4vrl Rd) Wc-4,0 ?I Date: . 6,ZOOG
Applicant/Owner: NC 'jwT 'D'd * County: f
S
f C
Investigator: tate: /
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ©e No Community. ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes to Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
vcr_=r &,nn m
t Species Stratum Indicator
n
Dominant Ma Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
"
i
1. uda?E S Fes- 9.
2. 5UI6 00 S lAct 1 o. -
3. S c?Crf S ?AC?? 11.
4. l• V FAG 1 Z
S. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15. _
8. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that ars OBL. FACW or FAC /M
w
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: A, wo..o L;-",J-e1 ? rN?1.?a«d p?? S?c??S • S1Ya??^1 }p«(,-5 W

wynnniorw
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
aturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Other
--4o' Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
i
ts
Sediment Depos
_rainage Pattems in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
DepOrof Surface Water: - Q- (in.) _Z'0xidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ W er-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: - IZ--- (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
e.? I? ,.
t v
Remarks:
?..lC w
Jjr\ pr
I
/
/
(r
J?rr??u?grLne C/..nq Jva,_3h+(-(o..??1
3-3
i
SOILS
Map Unit Name Scan .A.4'
(Series and Phase):??// QJ Drainage Class: ?d
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): hGwl 4cr PQ 1f0.a(Lj i 1 -?S Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist)- (Munsell Moist)
4-f- 104 r 1 j

Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
Yi.nd. 4r?,nv..-?a?
it, 6. 6 646- C /? 1
Ih.6ILL, ClW415'ly
Hydric Sail Indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sultidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
1:-educing Conditions
eyed or Low-Chrome Colors
_ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
--listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: lkl: avu ?eu?C?tJill+neL ?u'p .!,!..45y ccJ? ?a `fib) (???M? 6ral `?K?
-Lfpe.' Iz -
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? e] No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? ,?e No
Remarks: 3114 Il 0-(( V/QirJIJ?Ys
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? 679? No
pproveo by
3-4