20061921 Ver 1_Application_20061218

e SST 1,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
c?
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICA iAEL F. EASLEY LYNDC,,,[Y[,,PPETF
0)VL{KN< It SI(CRI['I??Kl'
December 12, 2006
11. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Lund
NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit 33 Application for the proposed replacement
of Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446 (Linneys Mill Road) over Rocky
Creek, in Alexander County. Federal Aid Project No. BRL-
1446(2), State Project No. 8.2780901, WBS Element 31374.1.1,
TIP No. B-4006, in Division 12.
Dear Sir:
Please find enclosed a copy of the Pre-Construction Notification, pen-nit drawings, 1/2
size plans and Categorical Exclusion for the above referenced project. The North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 8 on a
new alignment with a new 110 feet long single span bridge. There will be no permanent
impacts associated with this project, however, the construction the new bridge will result
in 0.02 acres of' temporary impacts to surface waters. There are two jurisdictional
wetlands within the project area but will not be effected by the new bridge and alignment
construction. Traffic will be maintained on the original bridge until the new bridge is
constructed.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The water resource impacted for project B-4006 is Rocky Creek located in the Yadkin-
Pec Dee River Basin, SUhbasln 03-07-06. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) classifies Rocky Creek as "Class C" stream and is located in Hydrological
Cataloguing Unit 03040102. There are no Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High
Quality Waters (FIQW), WS-I, WS-11, or watershed Critical Area (CA), within 1 mill;
upstream or downstream of the project study area.
MAILING ADDRESS: TE:I EPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _ FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION Bui, DING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENI?IROt:MEWAL At- /SIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICF CENTER WEBSITE: WWWNCDOT.ORG RALFIGII NC
R,.t.EIGH NC 27699-1548
The North Carolina Wildli(c Resource Commission (WRC) has stated that Rocky Ureek
is not designated as a trout stream.
Permanent lmacts: There will be no permanent impacts to surface waters resulting from
the constn.iction of this project.
I'emTtrarv Impacts: Connecting stormwater drainage ditches to Rocky Creek: along the
new alignment may result in 0.02 acre of temporary construction impacts. The permit
drawings depict the temporary surface water impacts as extending from the left bank
across to the right bank. The actual temporary impacts will he less with impacts only
alone the hanks where the ditches are cut into Rocky Creek.
I'hcre arc no impacts to jurisdictional resources due to utilities for this project.
Bridge Demolition
The existing bridge is a two-span structure with an overall length of I 1 i.cet., and a clear
roadway width of 22.1 feet. It was constructed in 1951. The bridge consists of a
reinforced concrete deck, steel I-beams, and reinforced concrete caps on timber piles.
Bridge No. K is s;tnicturally deficient and according to federal guidelines is considered to
he functionally obsolete. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Rcmoval
will he implemented, however, there is potential for bridge components to drop into
Waters of the United States during demolition. Any bridge components hat lid! mto t "k,
water during demolition will be removed according to Best Management Pra!aicc5
Federally Protected Species
As of April 2T, 2006, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service lists three 1'ederally
protected species for Alexander County (Table I ). The bog turtle was the only federal
listed species for Alexander County at the time the Categorical l;xcluSion (CE) document
was issued December 21, 2004. 'rhe bald eagle and dwarf flowered heartlcaf \-vere added
to the endangered species list for Alexander County on March 8, 2006.
Table l . Federally Protected Species for Alexander County.
Common Name Scientific Name _ Status _Habitat ? Biolo 'cal Conclusion
Bog turtlr _
-
- Clcmnrys muhlenberii- I'(S.A) No
?- Not Required
-?-?
Bald Eagle. llaliacctus lcucocephalus Threatened No No Ftl'cct
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf Hexastylis naniflora Threatened No No Effect
KFY
Status Definition
Threatened - A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
T(S/A) 1- "fhrcatened due to similarity of appearance a species that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. 'T'hese species arc not
biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
Avoidance and Minimization
N('I)OT has minimized impacts to the fullest extent possible. The proposed bridge
replacement will span Rocky Creek-, therefore, totally avoiding permanent surface water
impacts. The two wetlands in the project area will be avoided and the existing bridge
will be utilized as an onsite detour negating the need for a temporary detour thereby
reducing temporary impacts. NCDOT will not adhere to Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds for this project. This designation was erroneously assigned to this projcct
because it was believed Rocky Creek flowed into the South Yadkin River less than a half
mile downstream of the bridge site; however, the confluence is actually 25 miles
downstream.
Mitigation
Construction for this project will impose temporary impacts to .jurisdictional waters,
theretore, no mitigation is necessary for this project.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary construction impacts to Rocky
Creek can be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary
Construction Access and Dewatering). We are, therefore:., requesting the issuance of a
Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing the temporary surface water impacts of Rocky Creek.
All other aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR. § 771.115(b).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3366 will apply to
this project. All general conditions of WQC 3366 will be met. Therefore, we are not
requesting written concurrence from DWQ. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0501(a)
we are providing two copies of this application to DWQ for their records.
Thank you I'm your assistance with this project. A copy of this permit application will be
posted on the NCDOT Website at htip://207.4.62.65/PDF'A/PermApps. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Jeff Hemphill at [phone].
Sincere] , I
? !do
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc.
W/attachment
Mr. John Flcnnessy, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, l?SF'WS
Ms. Marla Chambers. NCWRC
Dr David Chang, P.E., Hydraulic,
Mr. Greg Pertetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. M.L. Holder, P.E. , Division 12 Engineer
Ms. Trish Simon Division 12 DEO
W/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.1., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Bryan Kluchar, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
I
Office Use Only: Forin Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing,
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleiah. NC 27699-1598
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: [phone]
2. .Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446 (Linney's Mill Rd) over Rocky
Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4006
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Alexander Nearest Town: Gilreath
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take 421 west to the
Oakwoods Avenue exit (Exit 285) in Wilksboro and turn left. Proceed south on Oakwoods
Avenue (SR 1001) for approximately eleven miles (the road changes names to Brushy
Mountain Road around the town of Oakwoods) to Linney's Mill Road (SRI 446) just across
the Alexander County line. Turn left on Linney Mills Road and Bridge No. 8 is a tenth of a
mile from the intersection of Linney's Mill Road and Brushy Mountain Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36° 1.83' ON 81 ° 3.41' °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Rock
8. River Basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://112o.cnr.state.nc.us/admin/neaps/.)
Page 2 of 9
A
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is located in a rural section of Alexander County.
The site is primarily surrounded by fallow field, roadside shoulder and by oak-hickory forest.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of replacing the existing, 22.1 feet wide 113 feet long bridge with a
new 110 feet long,, bridge that will span Rocky Creek. Traffic will be maintained on the
existing; bridge until the new bridge is constructed. Construction equipment will consist of
heavy trucks, earth moving,, equipment, cranes, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing; bridge is structurally deficient and
according to federal guidelines is considered functionally obsolete. The replacement of this
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 3 of 9
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No permanent impacts to surface
waters will result from the replacement of the structurally deficient Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
on Rocky Creek. Connecting new stormwater drainage ditches to Rocky Creek may result in
60 linear feet (0.02 acre) of temporary construction impacts.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodinL,.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year

Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest

Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreaLle_ multinly lens th X wirith_ then divirie by 43 560
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Site I Rocky Creek Temporary Perennial 35 feet 60 0.02

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60 0.02
Page 4 of 9
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the vroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream)-and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
V1 I. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Page 5 of 9
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. See Permit Application Cover
Letter
VIII. 1llitibation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmf;ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
Page 6 of 9
website at http://li2o.cnr.state.nc.us/wr2/inclex.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following infonnation:
Amount of stream mitigation. requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2: If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local. buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multiolicrs.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Page 7 of 9
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) - of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
Page 8 of 9
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

Applicant/ gent's Signature Datc
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
??o HORT/j ??\ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONNIENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH

ALEXANDER COUNTY
REPLA CE BRIDGE No. 8 ON SR 1446
OVER ROCKY CREEK
B-4006.
(o? 10.
OF $ Fic u 1

z •o
Q,

.L .
-' ,.. ?c
V p r

u -!
000
W z?4

E- 0
®? ?U
U
p

U
z

a 1
IQ*
LO
co
O Itr v
N Lf) LO
(D (D
co a)
U N N
Z
U U
(n Z Z
J
J

LL J J
J J
¢ Q
Q L
L L
L
H
> Z Z
Q Q Q
LC H H
O >
L Q Q
cr-
O O

?! J Q
4
P U) CC ? ?

W Z O O

Q: Q
cc Q

Q Z J J

O L z
z
CA CD
A
= w ui

O Z Z
CL' H H
m J J

O co
?t
O O N
© LO N
c
CO (D (
o
C)

W
J
O W
O J
W a O w

z C) CL o
H O
J W CL
Cr
LL! J W
W J W
Z
s
= W

O Q
O C? 1
'7 LL. U
J
W
U
CL *- N CO
Q
(L
z
t?
Q

F® c ? w

® z
?U
Z
G
W
U
z
9
bo
V-
0
ra`
LLl
WETLAND LEGEND
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
C WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
C WL
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
•! •• • • • CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION
TB
? TOP OF BANK
WE-- EDGE OF WATER
- C- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
--EL-- PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - 0 - - - WATER SURFACE
XX xXx x X LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
?- WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
F1 PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)

GRASS SWALE
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ALEXANDER COUNTY
PROJECT: 33374.1.1 (B-4006)
BRIDGE NO.8 OVER
ROCKY CREEK ON SR 144G
SHEET q OF Y 03/0&

z

< ?
n L
z
_
v

m ? I I ? I l

F a y
'
i
l O zz M
:h
L .rxj
`
< V
< p
y 3

<
LL

?: '6 m

i

o

o

I

N G
L
Z L

f

cu O
I

0
ca

a 14
C,

S C:
L
C
- Q

(3) v
C
r
C O

C? O

OD co

"s
z
a
To ? c
m

Z U U
! ? I
I I ?
I

? r? N o
U .Xr aQ)
E H I ? m
Q w U ?! I I I ? i
n.

I I ! l I
w
Q cm`°
?, E?
o
I !
j j
' o
x
wU I ! ?
? a I

w
U N
I
O
? ? a o O O ? O
? F. ? O O O i i I
? I
Q I ? I

?
U o
O
cn a
E ? a c o
? o
.
U a ? o I

W
d -? `n
? ?v I I
U

J (O
? ? cu
?

i t

I I

i

O
U
? c I ? I! ? I
W U I

? O
J w I

m
? LL j
> O
c
rn
?
u.
I

Qw

? a a?
U)p
v ~ 'J [D

?U) _Z
cnw LLI

I

N co

O t
m
H

O
co O
~ J

r ?
t

?

I
(n Z ? ? `? H

REYISIOKS
03-:,FR-,ION 03:7,
s: n3, rrJ .I,, r t5 galen'.G-•+.1l?o?J-yn\b )06_r dy_?e t_Fsh, djn
H H ,? m ¢S ixF
t` > > 0 A S° i
y ti
I O o
O ? ? N
O 0 O tf
O ? ? O
IH ? r ?
O > i N ! `° ory
44 ? y C-
o O ??* wmi SgD
eo ••pp Sn o ?
\ 'S,NP WpppS ? O it pOO y ? x
V ? oy O o?
NOppS
ti
P \\ \
W
7 ES 5, Rl
_ r >
Q - Ea,s lvc Miv \
"Po
N 26.3138', " $y \
9.39.
J Y \\ ?
3<,ps r ?c \
N N ¢ CC?? I r UQ? $ \ \\
> I S?m
l o w ? z $A
`rte" _ _ LJ o~n " * Vl Y
?J
$ \I ?ZT ?r s?F w co tf (A
Z
m t>? ? 8 c
ti
° ° D r t ° ORS I
NOQ U
\ 1S ? I
s rcVA
m 1 <°?
\1 oQ\ e?a?
4
6°%'4,?0 H
\0S
25. 6-,S, E P ` ao ..
u
z s A? E
NZ o
V n y
> m m
C 1 / T
m z 'o E
F ?
' u?N?1[Uy1 N
rr,
n t
` T
O ?Q1 ?
I
C> $$
nl i bb Q? o
II II II 4 p N ?? ??O m?v
II ?W W ?'1 -1 t` O P R c? 5y?? V1 l/1 Vl r'Orbm7
m \?q O1 ?A 8? ENO 11 II II spa p pv)+ui ?' 7C O O O r I ?ri?' ,
rn4?? `?'a vl`?awvy, ?o N"' Naa rn oYYY+++ I
to
m?yrOp? I ????m
u u u u u?lo m0-I?OD? °
?I fV?\ p II 11 II II i ' .r
u, co
rn O A rn ` f'
ul
vl ? y ? a4 § $ m
f
\ 1
:yj -1 C)
p p 11 u p rn 4 tl p M 4 C+l(n NW p3 C \\ ^?
W
Qy y Wm \\\\, O li
\ \ LV

T
Vl m
m
I 1
\ i >
\ m / ;re T
yam'/ ?v.`

8/17/99
SE?
d?EC R?
1 /
`C)
0
e
dN .
o$
S 307x39 W

II
I?
I
25
u
? m jj]]s N b y m >D
/ Z $ lJ? N O -DI
r cl
0 0,0 5
y F ??/ In Nyy N :ry
NNN ? ? 1? m4W
/ r r r 111 n
v ? x
v o i
Arr ?
mo 0 0
'O p O N
^" of

N N
> >
?N
u
H ~
O O
N N
? O
O 0°
.°n r
H ~
m'0" I Ni
}?, r >
NIP I / N
0
r ' m O?i
H
cI ti 111 `'?` t
N V1 ti \I 9p .n
0
N a ? o
7Yppps \I\
II
n
R ?a
ey
V = M
U
0 r
Q
o ?' o ati €20M
m

? s °oD

?
~ i o t20

o o
. 9
N p o °
V o 8 °-
}n Y ? .9

r
? m
0 A V
O 4 m
o n
r ti
m N la?tra
N m o p-1
?? o aD
a orr
-gym
N ?a
m
0
v
RJ D O .y
N =
p O N
? ;+

az 0
s? A°

>
d
2
,
O r ? '2

n? nrF?; j
s ,gin c . ?,? ?s__ts ?galen?b-J2J6`.J- 06 ,-I,-.etpah.?gn
v
m
v+ Z
c°
?m
?aN
amm
n =
?n0
mn
A A
K
v? '+ r O D
R? II II II n n y
II
N
ma,tiroD?
II 4 4 n II
n N c
`?aQQA
?tirOD?
u u u u u
btc,t? No
n n n a to cf?' ? -• -• -• ? , N m
II
?, _ N N a a m 0?? ? ? R
?? ?r aY ?.Y o
Fi 920
N ? ? ? ? N S F I ? . Fn ; ? 1 rL? I ! ? N o? Nsr
14
c i ?t I
tnaJtirOD? lip A -

n L4 L4 y.
61

a

?•, O f
az Am ? a

V z

O ?Y oy
?
Tf ? =N ?Q a ?

„r'R-_ i, 4 :9
v
l6-APR-2006 15:46
•\roadwoyy\ pr-oj\b4000_rdy_tsh.dgn
sF££USERNAMEE$'£ $ - fl'-?iA?ig9
[CONTRA C?': 020158 TIP P OJECj': B-4006
o o N N c
m
' o z n I °
22 (A
s 0 o o
t2l
C6 i t o
N o o Si Qi_
= s
0
" <-iv:cK) o?", 000 p? e%'C p0 S °
n u u u u n y y ?i ti n
u w >? a m i. b n.} n y b y / $
?s
eeae a n? o can y
yy a
o°
a y c a ??
Z Z t2l
?.
z x ?o\s r
c? 0 `?_ (I
= g o?•
o
2N
m _
m .b -- --- 06/ UO
h
0 y SULPHUR SPRING RD. d
O
/ y( A?EkAEsE Co b n
M
h
C
CI
o. o. 1 ? O O
u o r V
14
. a
3 0 0
+?b
x ?g? n0 ??
col
T m T / I I y b rn
D rn ?/ ® ?
00
oa PO m? O
$ rn
i
0.4-
0%
+ b ?
?o
?o I b y
z rn b
1 Q
y g k
ti Q on Ii p
i? a a
w
o ?? ti o o? y
4 m ?.
y ? • $14
ti°v o C 0 L r a. 0
o x C7 +
?m oo a roz
a
a ?y z
y 3?
"-APR-2006 09:36
_\_ oeCwpy?Pro?\64EE6_r dy_psh.dgn
I
?

I
n

v ^^
YJ
, 1
? 0 'ptf tf CO)

\ p9 10p05
$ s ?
L? ~
+ k
Fi
+
+ j
r o
°
y
w ? o

.r SORB~r/q SPghOS q ` ? _?

? m `?BSJ

O
z
O
m
Ln ?
M m
mm
(n N
m 2
M
MM
a) n
O O
I
rI
?
1 1
O ?
O
I ?
?m
1
O
N
ZJ
O
n
r
m
N
rM£R
?''u'?. d FGY
V
I
O
m

D

V1 y Z t
S o y •b

Z w n l

D

m
m pZ O
m ; -I
No
-I ? m p

D !I ,SI (A
r C)
O rn
r
D
W o ° z
A O r
m
W o a
O ? o ul
G7 a~° m
m + ?o
? r = * i
m N
r
D
Q

O
I
N
= I m

aMrrD V?, zi
If 11 11 II 1
1 w wN4
v?I°i,,N$yl`2g
I?iQ?V'??wlla
d
u u'1 u' cn
II t* N p
? p
1 M 11 1 1 (n
?t?ilQl?lV
n u '1 u u t?
1?11?AO?0? ? O\
Q?
I
1 1 1 1 1 C,?
?^ w j u' °Z j1 di
ri
u n 11 u 1 to
A .Y N
N
0
Trn
z
Fo
r ?
x Z N
° N ~
m ?
D"O
sA
n °
rnA
Hm
199
NI
?52
'r rYiF
t - p

O !
? G
Oj,
?
p

O O < N
m
° ° n a m0

a ?5?
?`
2 Oi
N ? n O I ?f
on
a ?
?, o _
r?
y
'4 O
> c? c? ` ? z x
o' 3.rn K 0 O
F
,
i
U MD005 ?
I?I ?

A
I ?
I
T '? 9(
,
5
l (? y f t

p o ?^
?_
N

?'??(?\ \ 'r '? ? ? FOOD 4 ? `\
\ x b
C)
v1 v 1
O N w?r 1?

a
b?
0
H coil
1
i•I

?Oo
N/t
i

l
u;
0
f'
n
x m
I I II ?? ?
?Oy
PAP 1'
I
Noo ? N?
gig o ?
o+ NO
Q ?;o m
do °?
i ?
I
?
?
N p
°
•
D O
?
?
pppl
•••ppp
i 9 Q
V
o ° AT
I
?
? °
IT
P 1 ?H
°mn
d i T \ = r'
p I
6 ?
H
r;
1
:7j -I-ODv
uuuulO
w?N A
rv
N
a
1 ? ? 0
yp oy
m F?
? fn
4
a
0 1
I

8/17/99

say
`I( A a
C)
n
O /
O Q
a a /
+ co)
0
O C) ^
0

?j a3dd, ~ yyed? \
!, M
? f
i ?
ti $?
?s
?,. ORBS
rn
??JOH -mss J .
A33?? r0 J?J9. W
Q
?•? rn ? m?p? v ? ?,
m
I LT / NNN
I E ?v/ r<. P P T o
C w? 000 3 0zp
r7 pNi "'' -? -I -1
a? ??? ? pmt
/ uu?IN N H 3 4?W
G m ?i
? o m v ? v
a F+i $ yy oboln
tl ; ? ?r
Y71 g ? ? "1H ? n ?O
r,? w'"., y Nr3 ° p?
I ' {NN' 1 N + O Q N
Vi 'Y u N ? O rn
> y r 0 C V
O o v o o a -rte
O N N ? A m O D
o °p O >
xlt j ?"P = a > -°F
I I? ?(f A r m G m
1 4 N - -
r : ? ? g3
U
1 1 N ?` ?m
b /
?gv
I y s ? _
O N
I ?a N / A u o
•-1
25
Cli
S:O'W 4 ?Ot O 9 `fib S rr.? lr'?c ? ? .?i?
- L N ° m oA-I ? z ?
asr
- ?-w ?? gnR, ,-e 3
g
-pa m n o n
x z
00 ill T v' d Z
t ?
.
Alexander County
Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
Over Rocky Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1446(2)
State Project No. 8.2780901
W.B.S. No. 33374.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4006
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Approved:
QJ-UW4
DATE 'Yj r&egory J. Thorpe, PhD, Environmental Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
/Z Zl? 0,
0
DATE John F. Sullivan, III, P.E., Division A strator
4-%-_Federal Highway Administration
Alexander County
Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
Over Rocky Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1446(2)
State Project No. 8.2780901
W.B.S. No..33374.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4006
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
December 2004
Dennis Pipkin, PE
Project Planning Engineer
William T. Goodwin Jr., PE, ju Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:
Alexander County
Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
. over Rocky Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1446(2)
State Project No. 8.2780901
T.I.P. No. B4006
1. Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Resident Engineer:
Reve etation: The existing bridge and approaches will be removed after the new
bridge is completed, and the area will be revegetated with appropriate plant species.
Sedimentation & Erosion Control:
The NC Wildlife Resources Commission stated that sediment and erosion control
measures should adhere to design standards for sensitive watersheds.
2. PD&EA Branch, Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Resident
Engineer:
Bridge Demolition:
The bridge is composed of a reinforced concrete deck on steel I-beams. The
substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on timber piles. There is potential for
components of the concrete sections to be dropped into the Waters of the United States.
The resulting temporary fill associated with this bridge would be a maximum of 106
cubic yards. During construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
removal will be followed.
Design Standards for Bicycle Routes:
SR 1446 is designated as North Carolina State Bicycle Route No. 2. Therefore,
AASHTO Design Standards for Bicycle routes will apply.
Alexander County
Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
over Rocky Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1446(2)
State Project No. 8.2780901
W.B.S. No. 33374.1.1
T.I.P. No. B4006
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 8 is included in the 2004-2010 North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program and is eligible for the Federal-
Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The location is shown in Figure 1. No
substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal
"Categorical Exclusion".
1. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge No. 8 includes a 3-span superstructure composed of a reinforced concrete floor and
reinforced concrete deck. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on timber piles.
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 39.3 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered to be structurally deficient. The
replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer traffic operations. According to the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards, this bridge is considered to be.structurally
deficient since it has a deck geometry appraisal of 4 out of 9 paired with a sufficiency rating of
39.3, which is less than the FHWA sufficiency standard of 50 or less. The bridge is therefore
considered eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program.
Other considerations such as wear and tear resulting from increasing traffic, aging (53 year old)
bridge components, and increasing maintenance costs all justify the replacement of this bridge.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located in northeastern Alexander County (see Figure 1). Development in the area
is agricultural and small business in nature.
SR 1446 is classified as a Rural Local facility in the Statewide Functional Classification System
and it is not a Federal-Aid Highway. SR 1446 is designated as State Bicycle Route No. 2.
Design Standards for Bicycle routes will apply.
In the vicinity of the bridge, SR 1446 has an 18-foot pavement width with 6-foot grass shoulders
(see Figure 3). The roadway is situated approximately 20 feet above the bed of Rocky Creek.
The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1951. The overall length of the structure is
113 feet. The clear roadway width is 22.1 feet. The bridge is posted with weight restrictions of
17 tons for single vehicles and 22 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers.
The current traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to 800 VPD by
the year 2025. The projected volume includes one percent truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and
2 percent dual-tired vehicles (DT). Regulatory speed limits are not posted in the bridge vicinity.
An advisory speed limit of 35 NTH is posted for a road curvature east of the eastern bridge
approaches.
There were no accidents reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 8 during a recent three year period.
No school buses cross the bridge at the present time.
SR 1446 is a designated North Carolina Bicycling Highway.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
SR 1446 is a designated North Carolina Bicycling Highway (State Bicycle Route No. 2), thus the
bridge will be constructed utilizing Design Standards for Bicycle Routes. AASHTO bicycle
standards require 54 inch high rails, minimum offsets of 4 feet on each side, and approaches
accommodating 4 foot turf shoulders on each side.
The anticipated overall length of the replacement structure will be approximately 110 feet. Final
structure length will be determined during final design. The bridge will be of sufficient width to
provide for two 11-foot lanes with a 4-foot rail offset on the south side and a 6 foot rail offset on
the north side. Approach shoulder width will be 6 feet. Shoulders will be increased by 3 feet
where guardrail is warranted.
The existing roadway approaches will be widened to a 32-foot pavement width to provide two
11-foot lanes. Six foot (9-foot where guardrail is required) grass shoulders will be provided on
each side.
Initial design indicates the completed project will provide a design speed of 30 mph. Therefore a
design exception for design speed is anticipated.
SR 1446 is classified as a Rural Local facility in the Statewide Functional Classification System
and it is not a Federal-Aid Highway.
B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
One alternate for replacing Bridge No. 8 is described below.
Alternate One: - Replace the existing bridge with a new bridge on new alignment to the south
of the existing bridge. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
The "do-nothing" alternate will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1446.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not practical due to its age and deteriorated condition. The
bridge is considered structurally deficient due to the aging of the timber components.
Consideration was given to replacing the bridge at its existing location, provided that a suitable
offsite detour could be found. However, the only offsite detour of reasonable length is not paved.
The Division Engineer has stated his opinion that no suitable offsite detours are available. At the
scoping meeting, all attendees agreed on this point. In addition, the Alexander County
Emergency Management Director has expressed objections to use of any offsite detour with this
project. Thus this alternate was eliminated from further consideration.
Replacement of the existing bridge with a new bridge on new alignment to the north of existing
was briefly considered. This alternate was eliminated due to the existence of a hill and an
intersecting road to the north. Design of such an alternate would involve extensive earthwork,
with resulting high costs as compared to the southern alternate.
D. Preferred Alternative
Bridge No. 8 will be replaced at the new alignment as shown in Figure 2. Alternate One is
recommended because local terrain relief does not allow replacement to the north, and
replacement to the south will result in an improved alignment and improved design speed.
The NCDOT Division 12 Engineer concurs with the selection of Alternate One as the preferred
alternate.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs for the build alternative is as follows:
Item Alternate 1
Structure $ 264,000
Roadway Approaches 346,000
Structure Removal 21,000
En g. & Contingencies 104,000
Mobilization & Miscellaneous 199,000
Total Construction Cost $ 934,000
Ri t-of-way Costs $ 67,000
Total Project Cost $ 1,001,000
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Water Resources
The project area is located within sub-basin 03-07-06 of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin (DWQ
2003). This area is part of USGS Hydrologic Unit 03040102 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Region.
The structure targeted for replacement spans Rocky Creek and the adjacent floodplain. The
portion of Rocky Creek that lies within the project area has been assigned Stream Index Number
12-108-11 by DWQ (2002).
The proposed bridge replacement will allow for continuation of pre-project stream flows in
Rocky Creek, thereby protecting the integrity of this waterway. Long-term impacts resulting
from construction are expected to be negligible. In order to minimize impacts to water resources,
NCDOT Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly
enforced during the entire life of the project.
NCDOT will coordinate with various resource agencies during project planning to ensure that all
concerns regarding bridge demolition are resolved. The replacement of Bridge No. 8 can be
classified as Case 3; therefore, there are no special restrictions beyond those outlined in Best
Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters.
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
Waters of the United States
The project area contains two vegetated wetlands that can be classified as palustrine, forested,
broad-leaved deciduous, temporarily flooded (PF01A) and palustrine, persistant emergent,
seasonally flooded (PEM1 C). Both wetlands are located in the southwesternmost portion of the
project area; with one wetland located just west of the stream and road, and the second wetland
located adjacent to the eastern stream bank
Information pertaining to jurisdictional areas within the project area is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Jurisdictional Areas (Site numbers are depicted on Figure 2.)
Site Cowardin Classification Linear Distance (ft.) Area (acres) DWQ Rating
1 R3UB1 1489.0 1.0 N/A
2 PF01A N/A 0.1 36
3 PEM1C N/A 0.01 30
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition & Removal will be implemented. The bridge
is composed of a reinforced concrete deck on steel I-beams. The substructure consists of
reinforced concrete caps on timber piles. There is potential for components of the concrete to be
dropped into the Waters of the United States. The resulting temporary fill associated with this
bridge is a maximum of 106 cubic yards.
Protected Species
One federally protected species is listed for Alexander County (February 3, 2003 FWS list); bog
turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii), which has a status of Threatened due to similarity of appearance.
Clemmys muhlenbergii (Bog turtle)
Threatened due to similarity of appearance
Family: Emydidae
Date Listed: May 1, 1997
The bog turtle is listed as T(S/A) due to its similarity of appearance to another rare species listed
for protection. T (S/A) species are not subject to Section 7 consultation and a biological
conclusion for this species is not required.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation' Act
of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106
requires Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings (federally funded,
licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register
of Historic Places and afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such
undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
The NC Historic Preservation Office (HPO) stated in a letter dated October 20, 2003, that no
archeology survey was recommended. However, an architectural history survey was
recommended due to the age of the bridge. Further information was submitted at a conference
with the HPO in March 2004, and the HPO concluded that an architectural history survey was
not required. The HPO stated their revised opinion in a letter dated March 31, 2004.
C. Archaeology
The NC Historic Preservation Office (HPO) stated in their letter dated October 20, 2003, and
again in a letter dated March 31, 2004 that an archeological survey is not recommended.
VII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate bridge
will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and
lack of substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of Transportation standards
and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in
land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-Way acquisition will be
limited. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The proposed project will not require right-of-way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to
consider the potential impact to prime farmland of all land acquisition and construction projects.
There are no soils classified as prime, unique, or having state or local importance to be affected
by the project.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the regional
emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required. If vegetation is disposed of by
burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the
North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. This evaluation completes
the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National
Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the North
Carolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Alexander County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. However, this
crossing of Rocky Creek is not within a designated 100-year flood zone. There are no practical
alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. Any shift in alignment will result in an impact area of
about the same magnitude. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase the level or extent
of upstream flood potential.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental
impacts will result from implementation of the project.

?•,D 3 ` z.
MOUNTAW
mil, ate .s ? 704
732 '` J 1 • r`? t -
19
-19-
,,,;; 399 714. 284 .6 •t? ?16'x, . i .
25 Firars uma -*
>? a ;36\ 624 EI-EV.9050 693
f`-
7- -711 386 N ,0.4
713
a659 345 24
J %,?.?•
247? 73? f 121-'--?
Z. ?P622 664 ¢37 ,' ?.
` -- 560
PORES `?-'D ' ---- -?' _.-%_-„a;, . \•s N-,?.' .
KNOB
35 I ?Qr
d... - .. j
- -1•is 269 `?? - `•"M? \ V?.?rq ao ???
97
0298 288 , ?.1; 7 '\. . • ,z? ?t '• ??'?
wr ear r ITn t• 13 r•c /u"a v 1? +•,
t ' 2-321
..b 33
?? •n, ,. ? 1 ?, i.-+s ITC' } •\ ,. a ? ?
1412 / v r.c • S -
L 4 1.5
?f ; .j ISIS '-`r• -?' •1 \ •-• .?...i / ',:?_. l C
1!57.0..i' Isis
t ROCKY FACE "C" Y.
ELEY. WA 07-
b •
•, tj \ . i ,rot r'? / 1."K ASOiIiT .9 tr \ ^
41004TAWS i t"
26
?Ro" TOP : ' ,.t •a SPR14G UTN.
uro 1.2 R,uq, 7 , ELEV. W? o _ _ •'°
•? i
.?, w1
`' --- \
•\
' NORmi CAROLINADFPARTMENT OF
ZRANSPORTATION
DAMON OF 1-hGuwAYS
j PROJECTDEVIIAPMENT&

oa?p
? / ENVMONMENTAL ANALYSLSBRANCH
ALEXANDER COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. SON SR 1446
OVER ROCKY CREEK
.B-4006
Fig 1

Looking east
across Bridge
No. 8
Looking west
across Bridge
No. 8

?y North Carolina Department orTransportation
Division of Highways
Project Development & Environmental Analysis

Va?d? Branch
Alexander County
Replace Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446
Over Rocky Creek
B-4006

® North Carolina Wfldlife Resources Com>:rnisslon 9
Charles R Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit, NCDOT
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator 44
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: July 18, 2003
SUBJECT: Review of Natural Systems Technical Reports for bridge replacement projects
scheduled for construction in CFY 2006. Yellow light projects.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has requested comments from
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) regarding impacts to fish and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject projects. Staff biologists have reviewed the
Executive Summaries for the Natural Systems Technical Reports and have the following
preliminary comments. These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work
within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and
vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage beneath
the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by canoeists and
boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
Bridge Scopings: 2
Yellow Light Projects July l 8, 2003
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be
planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws,
mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat
intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the steam
underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of requesting
additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can recommend that the
project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, Mr. Hal Bain with the NCDOT
- ONE should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information
on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources must
be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within
15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants
into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and should
be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
Bridge Scopings:
Yellow Light Projects
July 18, 2003
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to
prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids,
or other toxic materials.
17. If culvert installation is being considered, conduct subsurface investigations prior to
structure design to determine design options and constraints and to ensure that wildlife
passage issues are addressed.
used:
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels other
than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or floodplain
bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be reconnected to
floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by utilizing sills on the
upstream end to restrict or divert flow to the base flow barrel(s). ' Silled barrels should be
filled with sediment so as not to cause noxious or mosquito breeding conditions.
Sufficient water depth should be provided in the base flow barrel during low flows to
accommodate fish movement. If culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or
notched bales should be installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This
should enhance aquatic Iife passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by
maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish
and other aquatic organisms. In essence, the base flow barrel(s) should provide a
continuum of water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of
velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain
dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water
velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts
aquatic life passage.
4. R.iprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a ?-
manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should
be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
Bridge Scopings: 4
Yellow. Light Projects
July 18, 2003
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. If the area that is reclaimed
was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may
be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-4006, Alexander Co., Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446 (Linneys Mill Road) over Rocky Creek. j
YELLOW LIGHT. A WS-II High Quality Water (HQW) designation occurs 0.4 miles down
stream (South Yadkin River). Sediment and erosion control measures should adhere to the
design standards for sensitive watersheds.
2. B-4051, Cabarrus Co., Bridge No. 90 on SR 2408 (Gold Hill Road) over Black Run Creek.
YELLOW LIGHT. Black Run Creek is classified as WS-II and HQW (High Quality Waters)
and the Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughanfana), Federal Species of Concern and state
Endangered, has been found downstream A mussel survey should be conducted. Sediment -
and erosion control measures should adhere to the design standards for sensitive watersheds.
Turbidity curtains may be appropriate for any in-stream work and bridge demolition.
3. B-4071, Cherokee Co., Bridge No. 32 on SR 1393 over Junaluska Creek. YELLOW LIGHT.
Junaluska Creek, Class C Tr waters, is Hatchery Supported DPMTW. Listed species
concerns occur downstream of the project. A moratorium prohibiting in-stream work and
land disturbance within the 25-foot trout buffer is recommended from October 15 to April 15
to protect the egg and fry stages of trout. Sediment and erosion control measures should
adhere to the design standards for sensitive watersheds. The bridge should be replaced with
another spanning structure. We recommend incorporating into the design an area where the
public can pull off of the road for safer public access to the resource.
4. B-4075, Cleveland Co., Bridge No. 129 on SR 1184 over Grog Creek YELLOW LIGHT.
Grog Creek is Class C waters. There is the potential for listed aquatic species to occur in the
project area; therefore we request a mussel survey be conducted. If state or federal listed
species are found, consultation with appropriate resource agencies should take place and
sediment and erosion control measures should adhere to the design standards for sensitive
watersheds.
5. B-4117, Gaston Co., Bridge No. 173 on SR 1820 over Sailors Branch. YELLOW LIGHT.
Sailors Branch is classified as WS-1V. Sediment and erosion control measures should adhere
to the design standards for sensitive watersheds.
6. B-4148, Henderson Co., Bridge No. 12 on SR 1329 (Warlick Road) over Boylston Creek.
YELLOW LIGHT. Boylston Creek is classified as WS-IV. Several federal and state listed
species have been reported in adjacent watersheds. Surveys, including a mussel survey in
Boylston Creek, are recommended. Sediment and erosion control measures should adhere to
the design standards for sensitive watersheds.
?G
North Carolina Department of Cultural
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
October 20, 2003
Memorandum
To: Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
'r,
c
LYsIS
Division of Historical Resources
From: David Brook
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446 over Rocky Creek, B-4006, Alexander
County, ER03-0916
On September 4, 2003, Sarah McBride, our preservation specialist for transportation projects,
met with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the
minds concerning the above project. We reported on our available information on historic
architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. DOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based on our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we offer
our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of historic structures located within the
areas of potential effect. Therefore, we recommend a historic architectural survey be
conducted for this project. -
There are no recorded archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our
present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be
eligible for listing in the Natioanl Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project
construction. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in
connection with this project.
www.hao.dcr.state.nc.us

Location Malling Address Telephone/Fa:
ADM OSTRATION 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 (919) 7334763 • 733-9653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] • 715-4801
C']-NTT & 5L N Blount St., P.aleiLh NIC 4617 Mail Serv ice Center, Raleigh NC 2 7 6994 6 17 (919) 7 -6 S • 715-4501
Page 2
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical Exclusion
or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800. If you have
any questions concerning them, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review
coordinator, at 733-4763. Thank you.
cc: Mary Pope Furr
Matt Wilkerson

0 tea..,
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
March 31, 2004
MEMORANDUM
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
TO: Greg Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division o Highways
FROM: David Brook
SUBJECT: Replace Bridge No. 8 on SR 1446 over Rocky Creek, B-4006,
Alexander County, ER03-0916
Thank you for your letter of February 9, 2004, concerning the above project
pt
kt?w f e?
David L.
S--HrdQkz`,z
We have reviewed the additional material you have submitted to our office and are aware of
no historical or archaeological resources that would be affected by this project Therefore, we
have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
Dennis Pipkin, NCDOT
.A.
w-.6po.dcr Mte.ne.os
Location Malang Address Telepbone/Fa:
ADAMUSTRkT70N 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh. NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 7699-46I7 (919) 73;4763 •733-8653
_ 1010 -,. V,
G VTN R- I :.*: "'??: _ i? BIDan Lai-t RI. k.. a:.i7 Mmi Sen•ic_ .???.