20110364 Ver 1_401 Application_20110411

j~WSP~SELLS
15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
T: 919.678.0035 6 4
F: 919.678.0206 2 d ~ ~ ~ 3
www.wspsells.com
TO: NC-DWQ 401/Wetlands Unit
al ervlce enter
a elg -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE April 13, 2011
JOB N0. 07-4029 PROPOSAL NO.
"`~ Pre-Construction Notification
Honeycutt Creek Greenway
Raleigh, NC
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached ^ Via FedEx the following items:
Via Mail
Shop Drawings Prints ^ Plans
Copy of Letter Change Order
Photographs Control Photographs ^ Contact Prints
Diapositives x See Below
^ Samples
^ Manuscripts
^ Specifications
^ Diskettes
COPIES DATE N0. DESCRIPTION
5 4/13/11 Pre-Construction Notification
1 Check for Review Fee p

DENR - ^ tR

T HE SE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
x For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit
For your use Approved as noted Submit
As requested Return for corrections Return
For review and comment For your records
Control survey required Analytical aerial triangulation required
See below remarks For review and comment
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
^ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO: Lisa Potts, City of Raleigh, with enclosure SIGNED: Ralph Trou~rnan, P.E.
Gerald Pottern, RJGA, with enclosure

PRE-CONSTRUCTION
NOTIFICATION
HONEYCUTT CREEK GREENWAY
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
Applicant: City of Raleigh
Prepared By: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, N.C. 27610
April 13, 2011

Table of Contents
Pre-Construction Notification (PNC) Form
Agent Authorization Letter
Property Owners and PIN List
Project Vicinity Map
USGS Topography and USDA Soils Maps
Table 1. Potential Stream and Wetlands
Figures 1-12. Honeycutt Greenway Wetland, Stream and Buffer Impact
Maps
Figures 13-20. Wetland Impacts Close-Up Maps
Boardwalk Plans: 10 Feet Traditional and 6 Feet Unpaved
Buffer Impact Table by Zone and Temp-Perm
Unavoidable Impacts Discussion (to Buffers)
US-FWS Response Letter to Endangered and Threatened Species
NCDCR/SHPO Response Letter to Historic Resources
ACE Wetland Data Forms
DWQ Stream Data Forms

201 10364
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ~~
®Section 404 Permit ^ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ^ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular ^ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
^ 401 Water Quality Certification -Express ®Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
^ Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

^Yes ®No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. (EEP coordination is pending) ®Yes ^ No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ^Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ^Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Honeycutt Creek Greenway Trail, Longstreet Drive to Raven Ridge Road
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Raleigh, US-ACE, and greenway easements on many private properties.
3b. Deed Book and Page No. See attached list of property owners and PIN numbers ***
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: p
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: DENR - q

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ^ Agent ®Other, specify: City of Raleigh Parks & Recreation Dept.
4b. Name: Mr. Vic Lebsock
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Raleigh Parks & Recreation Department,
Design Development Division
4d. Street address: 333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601
4f. Telephone no.: 919-996-4786
4g. Fax no.: 919-807-5125
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Ralph Troutman
5b. Business name
(if applicable): WSP Sells, Inc.
5c. Street address: 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513
5e. Telephone no.: 919-678-0035
5f. Fax no.: 919-678-0206
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
~ B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Attached List ofProperties and PIN Numbers ***
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): South End: Latitude: 35.8742 Longitude: -78.6475
North End: Latitude: 35.9285 Longitude: -78.6060
1 C. Property size: Trail length = 28,800 ft x 25' ave.corridor = 16.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Honeycutt Creek (trib to Falls Lake) and Mine Creek (trib to
Crabtree Creek)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Honeycutt Cr = WS-IV-NSW; Mine Cr = C-NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse River 03-04-01 (Honeycutt Cr) & 03-04-02 (Mine Cr)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe existing conditions on the site and general land use in the project vicinity at the time of this application:
The proposed 5.5 mile greenway trail extends from Longstreet Dr just west of Six Forks Rd in northern Raleigh northeastward to
Raven Ridge Rd in Wake County. The southern half (following Mine Cr from Longstreet Dr to Strickland Rd) contains a mix of
low to high density residential and commercial development, with narrow to wide forested buffers along the creek. The northern
half (following Honeycutt Cr from Strickland Rd to Raven Ridge Rd) contains mostly low density residential development and
forest land, with generally wider forested buffers along most of the creek. The northernmost mile is on US-ACE Falls Lake
property which is managed as public game land.

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 3,640 sq.ft (0.084 acre) of wetlands exist within the proposed construction corridor, which is generally 25 feet wide
from Newton Rd north to Durant Rd and 6 feet wide from Durant Rd north to Raven Ridge Rd.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The Honeycutt Greenway project corridor crosses 40 drainage features, of which 24 were determined to be perennial or
intermittent streams and 16 were determined to be ephemeral stormwater channels. Of the 24 perennial or intermittent streams
in the project corridor, three have existing sidewalk crossings (no new construction) and two are in areas where construction
will affect stream buffers but not the stream channel. The remaining 19 perennial or intermittent stream segments that cross the
greenway construction corridor have a combined length of approximately 4121inear feet of streams.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is a public greenway trail for pedestrians and bicycles, connecting the existing Mine Creek Trail at Longstreet Dr to
the Falls Lake Trail at Raven Ridge Rd. The 5.5 mile trail will be paved from Longstreet Dr north to Durant Rd, including
"wayfinding" segments using existing sidewalks, and dirt trail from Durant Rd north to Raven Ridge Rd. Bridges or
boardwalks will be installed at stream and wetland crossings where needed on all segments. The traditional paved greenway
and boardwalk trail segments (south of Durant Rd) will be 10 feet wide and require a temporary cleared construction corridor
25 feet wide along off-road segments. The dirt trail and boardwalk segments north of Durant Rd will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and
clearing for construction will not exceed 6 feet wide. This portion of the project is entirely off-road through woods.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes construction of 12,400 feet of new "traditional" 10-foot wide paved trail (Type 1), mostly along Mine
Creek and Honeycutt Creek between Newton Rd and Durant Rd; 7,900 feet of "wayfinding" segments (Type 2) along existing
or proposed sidewalks between Longstreet Drive and Chatterson Drive; and 8,500 feet of dirt trail (Type 3) following
Honeycutt Creek from Durant Road to Raven Ridge Rd. Clearing, construction, and restoration methods vary based upon the
type of greenway trail, as described below.
• Type 1 "traditional" greenway trails are mostly paved surfaces, interspersed with boardwalk and bridges at stream and
wetland crossings. Paved surfaces are 10 feet wide with a surface of either asphalt or concrete, and bridges and boardwalk
surfaces will also be 10 feet wide. Type I greenways extend from Newton Road to Clear Brook Drive, from Chatterson Drive
to the existing Honeycutt Park trail, and from Clear Creek Farm Drive (entrance to Honeycutt Park) to Durant Road.
• Type 2 "wayfinding" greenway trail segments use existing sidewalk, except along Strickland Road where an existing 5-
foot wide sidewalk will be widened to 10 feet. Wayfinding greenway segments are those along Longstreet Drive, Six Forks
Road, Newton Road, Clear Brook Drive, Mourning Dove Road, Running Cedar Trail, Strickland Road, and Carriage Tour
Lane to Chatterson Drive. These segments mainly require signage and pavement markings, with minimal construction.
• Type 3 "natural trail" greenways are soil surfaced trails where ground disturbance is minor, except for bridges or
boardwalks at stream and wetland crossings and steep slopes. Type 3 trail will extend from the corner of Durant Road and
Honeycutt Road northward to Raven Ridge Road, nearly all of which is forested. This type of trail was selected in consultation
with US-ACE and NC-WRC staff to minimize user conflicts on the US-ACE public game lands.
Corridor Clearing: Clearing for greenway trails will vary depending upon the type of trail. For Type 1 paved and boardwalk
greenways, the trail alignment and construction access has been selected to avoid and minimize impact to large trees and
wetlands, and to provide as much separation as possible from streams and riparian buffers. Forest clearing will be performed
by mechanical equipment. The cleared corridor will be generally 25 feet wide to allow 10 feet for the trail plus 15 feet for
temporary equipment access. Tree protection fencing will be installed prior to clearing to protect those trees not scheduled for
removal. Because of the narrow construction corridor, trees will be cut down first and then the stumps removed where
necessary in uplands. In wetland areas, trees will be cut at ground level and stumps left in the ground. Tree removal will be
scheduled such that silt fence can be installed by the end of each work day to cover the area cleared that day. By working in
short segments and installing silt fence daily, impacts to streams and wetlands will be minimized. As an added measure to
protect wetlands, the contractor will be required to use mats when crossing wetland areas. No crossing of streams with clearing
equipment is planned, as the contractor has access to both sides of all streams. Silt fence or combination silt fence/tree
protection fence will be placed between the work area and the adjacent stream or wetland area to keep sediment out of the
stream and wetland area. Much of the greenway between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Drive will occupy an existing City-
maintained sanitary sewer right-of--way built prior to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Existing development and/or steep slopes
preclude shifting the trail farther beyond the buffer in these areas. Proposed impacts to the remaining forest between the sewer
corridor and stream bank (Mine Creek) have been minimized in project design.

Clearing for Type 2 wayfinding greenways will be minimal. Several short sections require clearing including one block of
Running Cedar Trail adjacent to Strickland Road and Strickland Road from Running Cedar Trail to Carriage Tour Lane. This
area sets on the ridge line between East Fork Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek. Active streams are more than 1,000 feet
away,and thus clearing for sidewalk in this area will impact neither stream buffers nor wetland areas. Still, erosion control
measures will be employed to contain any sediment within the construction limits.
Clearing for Type 3 dirt trail greenways will be 4 to 6 feet wide, and limited to trees less than 4 inches in diameter. The
alignment was selected in the field and surveyed to avoid larger trees. No mechanical equipment other than chain saws will be
used for clearing these trails. Trees will be cut at ground level and stumps left in the ground (in both wetlands and uplands)
and the cut remnants will be left in the woods beyond the trail for use as wildlife shelter. Leaf litter will be cleared away down
to the mineral soil surface, to define the trail location ,but no soil excavation is proposed except at stream/wetland crossings
where concrete foundations for bridge or boardwalk construction are necessary.
Constructing the Greenway: Following corridor clearing and staking for Type 1 greenway construction, the contractor will
begin rough grading and building retaining walls where specified. Underground utilities will be reinforced to support
additional loads where needed. Small bull dozers, hydraulic excavators, front end loaders, dump trucks, and sheep's foot type
equipment will be used. As the greenway subgrade approaches design elevation, storm drainage pipe with outlet protection
measures will be installed. Bridge and boardwalk concrete foundations along Type 1 trails will be installed during or just after
the subgrade. Where stream crossings use pipes, the pipes will be partly buried in the stream bed to maintain the natural
gradient. Rip rap used for energy dissipation downstream of pipes will be bedded on geotextile fabric.
Crushed stone will be brought in by dump truck and spread by motor graders along proposed asphalt surface trail segments.
Vibratory compactors will compact the stone base to the required compaction, then paving equipment will place the asphalt.
Once the surface is paved, the 2-ft wide shoulders and slopes will be dressed and seeded. Where concrete trail surfaces are
proposed, the contractor will grade the subgrade to design elevation, construct forms to contain the concrete, place reinforcing
steel, and then pour concrete. Because of the remoteness to the concrete greenway from public roads, the contractor will need
to transport the concrete from the delivery truck to each point of use using a Bobcat or similar small, maneuverable equipment.
At stream and wetland crossings (Type 1 and 3 greenways), silt fence will be installed between the work area and the stream.
Soil will be excavated for bridge or boardwalk foundations and removed from the site, and the concrete foundations poured.
Bridge bent piles will be installed, and concrete bent caps will be formed and poured to support the bridge. The remaining
bridge and boardwalk construction will require no further ground disturbance. Prefabricated steel bridges (for the larger stream
crossings along Mine Creek) will be delivered by truck, off loaded and set upon the bridge support bents. For the timber
boardwalk crossings (Honeycutt Creek and smaller Mine Creek tributaries), after the foundations are installed, the contractor
will cut timbers or helical anchors to the design elevation, install support girders, support beams, decking, and handrail system.
The contractor will collect all construction debris daily for disposal. All erosion and sedimentation control measures will be
regularly monitored at least weekly, immediately before a forecasted storm event, and immediately after the event.
Remediation measures will be employed to keep the measures performing as designed.
Restoration and Maintenance: Restoration of the disturbed area will commence near the end of construction. Following fine
grading, all remaining disturbed areas will be stabilized by seeding and mulching. Erosion and sedimentation control measures
will remain in working order until disturbed areas have been stabilized with new grass. No fescue or other non-native
perennials will be seeded in wetland areas. City Parks staff will maintain the greenways and take measures to mitigate any local
erosion problems that may occur. The 2-ft trail shoulder will be kept free of trees, but the remainder of the construction
corridor will be left to regenerate in natural forest (except in the existing maintained sewer right-of--way). These trails will not
carry motor vehicle traffic (other than maintenance vehicles) and thus will not become a significant source ofroad-runoff
pollutants, other than minor hydrocarbons from the asphalt itself. Bridge or boardwalk crossings at most of the stream wetland
crossings will minimize impacts to flow, aquatic life passage, soil compaction and vegetation.
4

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: No, not by Raleigh Parks & Recreation. There may ^ Yes ^ No ®Unknown
have been previous wetland or stream determinations for City
utility projects or private development along the project corridor,
but Parks & Rec has no information on any previous delineation or
permitting requests.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ^ Preliminary^ Final No JD prior to PCN submittal
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Gerald Pottern Other: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ^ Yes ®No ^ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ^ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain. The Honeycutt and Mine Creek greenway is part of the overall Raleigh Greenway system, but this project and
the existing trails at each end - to which it connects -each have in dependent utility.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ®Streams -tributaries ®Buffers ®Open Waters ^ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ -non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T

W1 ^ P ®T W-GA
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ ®Corps Sta 67+00
^
0.0192 T
Land clearing No pWQ
W2 ®P ^ T W-GA Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes ®Corps Sta 67+00
0.00840 P
Filled for Trail Alluvial Hardwood ^ NO ^DWQ

W3 ^ P ®T W-GB
l
i
d
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ N ®Corps Sta 68+50
^pWQ
0.0207 T
ear
ng
Lan
c o

W4 ®P ^ T W-GC
Culvert 2-3' Ditch in
Alluvial Hardwood Yes
®N ®Corps Sta 70+70
^DWQ
0.0024 P
Alluvial Hardwood o

W5 ^ P ®T W-GF Hillside Seep ®Yes ®Corps Sta 166+10
0.0019 T
Land clearing Alluvial Hardwood ^ Np ^pWQ

W6 ®P ^ T W-GF Hillside Seep ®Yes ®Corps Sta 166+10
0.0007 P
Boardwalk Alluvial Hardwood ^ Np ^pWQ

W7 ^ P ®T W_Gp
l
i
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ ®Corps Sta 175+30
^
0.0078 T
ear
ng
Land c No pWQ
W-GP ®Yes ®Corps Sta 175+30
W8 ®P ^ T
Boardwalk Alluvial Hardwood
^ No
^DWQ 0.0087 P

W9 ^ P ®T W-GH
L
d
l
i
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ ®Corps Sta 179+50
^
0.0057 T
an
c
ear
ng No pWQ
W10 ®P ^ T W"GQ Alluvial Scrub
P
li
d ^Yes
N ®Corps Sta 201+70 0.0012 P
Wingwall+Riprap Un
er
ower
ne ®
o ^DWQ

W11 ®P ^ T W-GN
Boardwalk
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ No ®Corps Sta 308+90
^pWQ
0.0017 P

W12 ®P ^ T W-GM 15 20
Boardwalk
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ No ®Corps Sta 329+70
^pWQ
0.0015 P

W13 ®P ^ T W-GM 6,102
lk
B
d
Alluvial Hardwood ®Yes
^ ®Corps Sta 331 +70
^
0.0030 P
oar
wa No pWQ

2g. Total wetland impacts: 0.0829 T+p
2h. Comments: Temporary Clearing Wetland Impacts = 0.0553 acre; Permanent Fill or Pipe Wetland Impacts = 0.0120 acre;
Permanent Boardwalk Wetland Impacts = 0.0156 acre. Total permanent impact = 0.0276 acre. » See attached Table 1 for sequential
listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor from south to north.

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) 3b.
Type of impact 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)? 3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps: 404, 10
DWQ: non-404) 3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet) 3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S-8 ®P ^ T Culvert, Sta 67+50 Mine Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood ^ Per ®Int ®Corps ^DWQ 4.0 45.0
S-26 ®P ^ T Riprap, Sta 201+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood Per I nt
® ^ p ^
®Cor s DWQ
4.0
8.5
S-28 ®P ^ T Culvert, Sta 238+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood ^ Per ®Int ®Corps ^DWQ 5.0 56.0
S-29 P T
® ^ Culvert, Sta 238+70 Honeycutt Cr trib
Alluvial Hardwood Per Int
® ^
®Corps ^DWQ
5.0
22.0

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts: I 131.5 ft
3i. Comments: Bridge or boardwalk crossings proposed on Perennial or Intermittent streams at S5, S6, 512, 514, S22, S23, S24, S25a-
b, S31,S32, 533, 534, 539, S40. Foundations will be outside OHWM, thus No stream impact at these 15 crossings. » See attached
Table 1 for sequential listing of all wetlands, streams, ephemeral channels, and open water crossings in the project corridor.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ^ P ®T Bent Tree Pond Replace existing wooden bridge Pond, Sta 172+25 0.0037 T
02 ^P^T
03 ^P^T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.0037 acre
4g. Comments: Boardwalk/bridge footings will be installed on uplands beyond normal pool in approximately the same location as the
existing bridge; no footings or other fill in waters. This impact is considered temporary.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
I If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P 1 NA
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ^ Yes ^ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ®Neuse ^Tar-Pamlico ^ Other:
^ Catawba ^ Randleman
6b. Buffer impact
# Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T) 6c.

Reason for impact 6d.

Stream name 6e.
Buffer mitigation
required? 6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet) 6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)

B1 ^ P ®T
Temporary Clearing Mine Cr + Honeycutt Cr
**Total all segments
Alluvial Hardwood
^Yes ®No
29,972
45,007

B2 ®P ^ T Permanent Trail
or Boardwalk Mine Cr + Honeycutt Cr
Alluvial Hardwood
Alluvial Hardwood
®Yes ^ No
49,443
49,223
B3 ^ P ^ T ^Yes ^ No
B4 ^ P ^ T ^Yes ^ No

6h. Total buffer impacts 79,415 sq.ft 94,240 sq.ft
6i. Comments: **There are 117 Zone 1 or Zone 2 Riparian Buffer impact areas, each with Temporary and Permanent impact
measurements. See attached Table 2 for sequential listing of each riparian buffer impact in the project corridor from south
to north, by zone and temporary vs permanent impact. See also the attached "Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and
Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment" for site-specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impacts.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
7. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
RJG&A delineated and mapped all streams and wetlands along the project corridor and consulted with City greenway planners and
WSP Sells engineers during design to avoid and minimize wetland, stream and buffer impacts wherever practicable. Existing
development and steep slopes pose tight constraints along much of the stream-side corridor segments, where riparian buffer impacts
are unavoidable, especially from Newton Rd to Honeycutt Park. Between Newton Rd and Clear Brook Rd an existing cleared
sewerline right-of--way will be used for some segments, rather than clearing a new corridor through forested land farther from the
stream. Trail alignments in these areas were selected on a site-by-site basis, considering proximity of the sewer to the stream-bank,
stream-bank stability, riparian forest habitat quality, adjacent wetlands, availability of land beyond the zone 1 buffer, connectivity
with streets, schools and parks, and other site-specific decision criteria. The majority of the proposed 22 stream and 11 wetland
crossings will use boardwalks or bridges (Type 1 Traditional Greenways and Type 3 Natural Trails) or existing sidewalks (Type 2
Wayfinding Segments) to avoid and minimize impacts. There are only three areas where permanent fill or piping in wetlands is
needed (total = 0.0120 acre) and four stream segments that require a culvert and/or riprap permanent impacts (total = 131.5 ft), based
on the design engineer's determinations. See also the attached "Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives to Riparian
Buffer Encroachment" for site-specific explanations of efforts to minimize Neuse Buffer impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Measures to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers during construction include minimize clearing widths,
using existing cleared lands and sewerline rights-of--way for access and staging areas, keeping equipment and stocked materials on
the off-stream side of the construction corridors, and using modular or stick-built bridges to minimize the size of vehicles needed in
remote forested areas. See also section B.3.e above for detailed discussion of construction methods and sequence.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes ^ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): I® DWQ ®Corps
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank -- NA
a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) ype Quantity
c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program -- NA
a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ^ Yes
b. Stream mitigation requested: 132 linear feet
c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ®warm ^ cool ^cold
d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 222,179 square feet
e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.0276 acres
f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan -- NA
a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ®Yes ^ No
buffer mitigation?
~6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
one 1 Total Permanent for Trail, Boardwalk, or Culvert 49,443 3 148,329
one 2 Total Permanent for Trail, Boardwalk, or Culvert 49,233 1.5 73,850

6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 222,179
g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
In-lieu fee payment
~6h. Comments: Raleigh Parks & Rec will coordinate with NC-EEP regarding in-lieu fee payment for impacts.

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1_ Diffuse Flew Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ®Yes ^ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Paved trail segments are only 10 ft wide, so runoff will be diffuse without ^Yes ®No
level spreaders or other special diffusion devices. Trails are for pedestrian and bicycle
use, so pollutant runoff from trails should be negligible.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ^Yes ®No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: See response lb. above
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
^ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ^DWQ Stormwater Program
^ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Raleigh (south of I-540) and Wake
County (north of I-540)
^ Phase II
®NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented Stormwater management programs ^ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
^ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ^Yes ®No
attached? NA -Not required for greenway trail. See response 1 b. above
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
^ Coastal counties
^ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented Stormwater management programs apply ^ ORW
(check all that apply):
^ Session Law 2006-246
^ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
h
tt
d?
^Yes ^ No
a
ac
e
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ^Yes ^ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ^Yes ^ No

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®Yes ^ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ^Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ^Yes ^ No
letter.) Comments: NA
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ^Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ^Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ^Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description .
Greenway trails provide recreational opportunities and may slightly raise property values, but do not induce urban development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. NA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ^Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? ®Yes ^ No
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
^ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? RJG&A submitted a biological assessment of expected impacts to US-FWS on 14 Jan 2011. We received a response
from John Ellis at the Raleigh FWS office concurring with our opinion that the Honeycutt Greenway project is "not likely to
adversely affect" any federally listed species. The FWS response letter is attached to the PCN ***.

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ^ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project area is more than 100 miles from areas mapped by NMFS or NC-DMF as Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ^ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WSPSeIIs submitted a scoping letter to the State Historic Preservation Office on 24 March 2011 is awaiting a response from SHPO.
Given the degree of existing urban development and disturbance from roads and utilities along the project corridor between Newton
Rd and Durant Rd, the insignificant nature of proposed trail impacts north of Durant Rd, and RJG&A's consultation of SHPO GIS
data, we do not expect any impacts to significant cultural resources, nor a recommendation from SHPO to conduct a cultural resources
field survey. If the SHPO response letter indicates otherwise, we will promptly inform USACE and NCDWQ.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in aFEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ®Yes ^ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Portions of the greenway corridor along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek are in flood-prone areas mapped by FEMA, including
several proposed stream crossings. The crossing of East Fork Mine Creek does not affect published flood elevations. A No-Rise
Certification was submitted to the City of Raleigh via the July 30, 2010 report prepared by Alpha & Omega Group (subconsultant for
bridge design) .The City has yet to issue its concurrence and acceptance of the No-Rise Certification. The crossing of Honeycutt
Creek affected published flood conditions. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision, also prepared by Alpha & Omega Group, was
submitted first to Wake County and then to FEMA in late 2010. Alpha & Omega Group has responded to several review comments
from FEMA, and we anticipate approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision soon.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The source of flood plain determination was published the FEMA floodplain maps depicting East Mine Fork Creek and
Honeycutt Creek..
Ralph Troutman, P.E., ~
WSP Sells, Inc. ~ , ~~`~~ A-/Q "~!~!/
7 7
AppllCant/Agent'S Printed Name Appli nt/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is vali my if an authorization letter from the applicant is Date
provided.)
12

~~~ ~
March 2, 2011
NCDENR -Division of Water Quality Wetland / 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Authorized Agent for PCN Application
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter authorizes WSP Sells (consultant) to act as authorized agents of The City of
Raleigh in submitting a PCN application for the Honeycutt Creek Greenway in Wake
County, NC. This letter authorizes the Consultant to sign and submit a PCN for the
proposed project with the intent of securing Clean Water Act Section 404/401 and
Riparian Buffer Authorization from the US Army Corp of Engineers and NC Division of
Water Quality.
Should you have questions, please contact me at 919-996-4785 or via email at
Lisa. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
o`~-'
Lisa Potts
Park and Greenway Planner
City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department
cc: Mr. Ralph Troutman, WSP Sells

0
U
a
3
C
N
N
7
U
C
0
N
c
0
(0
m
E
7
z
Z
c
7
O
U
Y
(6
a
c
(6
N
N
a
0
d

00 N

a~i O
0
N
'a-I
V1
t!1
to
Q1
N ~ N N LO lD lD M
M n N n n O1 O1 O1
Vf
~/1 Ol
O N
m 01
O 01
O ~
N v
N v
N N
at
W l0 N lD l0 l0 l0 l0 M
~ n Q n n n n n N
O N ~ N N N N N a
^ U U U U U U
a z z z z z z z z
x 0 S x S S x O
~ g c? ~? ~? t? c? o
W 2 W W W W W
Q V Q a Q a a O
z z ~ ~ z ac ac m

n
0
N O O ul Q1 d' O m .-I O ~ n O N 0 ~ 0 0 00
~D V Qt V lD V O1 ~ N O N N a> N O O O M V p
N O O u1 r-I lD N Vl m 00 N N N l!1 N N lp N N m ~

~
W

~ f!1
n
O N
00
O O
N
O

OC

OC m
L71
N a
N
e-I N
Vl
N
[t
N O
N
O n
Ol
O 00
d'
N N
Vl
N N
Lfl
N N
lA
N O
N
O N
V7
.-i N
t11
r-I M
~
N N
Vl
ci N
l!1
c-I n
Ol
O J
w
~.

^

~ n
N n
N n
N

~

~ n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N n
N z n
N n
N
n
N
n
n
N n
N
2
U
a ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Z U U l
0 ~ (
p U
~ m Z Z Z ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z Z Ol Ol at Z }
m m
x 2 2 2 ~ ~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 C 2 2 0 ~ ~ 2 a
m 0 l7 C7 l7 m m C7 C7 U l7 l7 C7 C7 C7 U l7 C7 C7 C7 m C7 C7 O O O l7 ~
vi
~..~ m w
J w
J w
J ~
~ ~
~ w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J w
J cc
C w
J w
J m m m w
J 0
m o a a a m m a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ a a o 0 o a rn
m a oc ~ ~ m m oc m z oc ~ ~ ~ m m oc ac ~ ~ J OC OC a a a OC ~
I-
Z
O `^
^
Q
Q
O o 00 0o Z
o_ a a ~

w O Z
J ~
N ~ v~ in ~
p[ ~ ~-i ~ C ~ K ~
^
a U ~ O ~ LL I- ~ 0' ~ K W O W
~ ^ ^ ~ ^ W Z Q u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ Q O
J W Z C:I O h
u m m ~ W U U U W z W
a:
^ m ~

W
0
~
~
Q _ _
Q O

3
w
U ~
W 1
0
IIl C
z Z
W
W
Q al
lfl
Z W
Ol
O
Z
Z O1
l!1
Z ~
~ ~'
W ~
O
Z
Z U
}
m W }
3 m
O X U
Z (,
Z Q J
t7 J ~ ~( Q X Q O
x O
2 ~( O
x Q
3 a O Z z Z Q ~
2 C7
o
m O u
co
o u
W ,y
N O vi
o O a
~
in
n 0
in o_
o
~ 0.
v J
~ - - - `^
o m

0
0
0
.1 m 2 ~
O
O
e1
~0 m
O m
N
m
N m
m
N
l0
N
.ti
~
~
~
O Q
~ ~ n ~o O ~ ~ ~n m o 0 0 0 0 v N a O ~ v o a v o_ o_ o_ o N
u u N ti o_ 2 2 0o m N .~ o_ N a .~ rn rn a rn N m ~-+ N o_ a s ~-+ O
U

^
Q

W

Z Z Z ~ Z

u U
u
u
a a

o
~
Z
o
o
~ o_
o a
a a a z a ~ `"
~ ~ o u v u Q ~
w v~ v~ vi vi Z u p O Z 2 Z
Z
3 in
z
in oc
z Q
,n o:
Z z
Z
Q
~
z
~
o
^
Z
Z
Z
p
l=J
o ~ ° ~ 3 W ~ 3 a = a Z Z u a u ~ w g o 0 0 ~ u
z a Q o 0 0 0 ~ a ~ ~ o ~ ~ J w ~ Q x a a a Q ~
~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J z 0 ~ ~., ~ ~, ~ ~, ~ a u u u ~ W
O
^ ~
~ W
o2S O
2 ~
W p
2 0
2 -
= ~y x

~
dS =
N _w
~ OTC

°' w
~ O

g
Y F- ^
~ O
of O
V1 O
to Z ~
a
z
O Q
S z
~
W S
F- ~
~ x
F- x
F- `"
(.7 3
}
W
~ ~
w ,~ w
o_
~
W w
a
o21 ~ ~
~ ^
Q a
in a
vi a
~ g W
O
u N ,,, O > ] ] 2 2 0 0 t7 a 0 a p O u y z oc
W z
W z
W ~ v~
W
w Q Q }
F-- in v~ of of N O }
F w ~ K a J ~ a ^ K a ~ Z Z Z U ~
~ m ~ U w W w w a ~ u Q Q a ~ 3 u ~ o m ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 LL ~
U u
J O ~ 2 OC y a m o
c _
~ 2 l7 ~ ~ _
2 0C 2 _
2 2 Z w 0 0 0 0

}
O

Q
~

S
l7
w
H
F
F-
F
H
H
H
a
0
C7
~n
w
Q
}
w
(7
} }
w
U
Z

~
S
Z
0
Z
0
Z
0
o:
U ^
w

Z
Z
~
W
C7
J -
Z -
Z
Z F
Z ~ }

O w
J ~
O O
W_ c
C m
p' Y
K w
J ~
~ J
H-

a H

W
~ ~

Z
Q
~n C
m Z ~
o_ Q
oC W
m W
m W
m W
m 2
~n J
W a
~ ~
U ~ Q
in W
m Q
o_ Q
K W
m a
2 K
m ~ K
a O W
O W
^ Q
W ^
ti lD M lD O1 V1 n n M O N n n C V1 N a n ~A O m V a O m O1 O1 n
V l!1 m Q7 N L/l l0 N V Ol O N N O m M c-1 N lD N l0 V m ~--1 W ~ 00 V

~ ~
n oo
N v
L!1 v
lD v
M ~
VI rn
N n
CF o
N ~
M ~
~--1 v
DD m
lD ~
O v
M N
Ol ,-i
00 v
00 v
n oo
M ~
n ~o
m o
M rn
ct rn
O n
Lfl v
O o0
N
Z lD V1 lD l0 m N ~--i M m M m m a M ~ lf1 O m ul l0 ~ l0 l0 n 00 01 Q1 O
L!1 lD lD n n 41 Ol DO Ol O O O Ql O N O ti O N N .-~ N N N M M M N
Z n n n n n o0 m o0 00 00 00 m o0 00 00 m CO oo m m o0 00 00 00 m m m O
-
a 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
n e-I
n e-I
n N
n O
n S
n .--i
n .1
n N
n .-~
n .~
n .--i
n .-a
n .--i
n e-i
n N
n e-I
n N
n ~--i
n O
co
r-I N N i-I 'i r-1 ~ N N c-I ei i-f ei N N c-I .--I e-I e-1 e-I N N N .--I ei r-1 i-i 'i
i leuoi;ipe~l ~euoi3lpeJl ~ leuoi~ipe~l b leuoilipe~l Z ~ie~l N
.~

To 8ayteaf .
?n .
~ ,
I p,MO~
t
' ~~ ~~
.IL
e
~{
/~~~~ ;I
~~ P
tl
g e- .
:1 Wr.•.
d -3"'- ~ w
~~
~~ ~,
%~ ~ ,~
t ,o
~ ~~ c ~ ,,

,~
b' ~ ..- en
Ct` $ `
rp
Muusr ~
"` C GJ~' j}
~~,l~s ~:~
- ~
~, AIRT ~~
~-
~
--
t ~ ~ ~
4
0 ~~~i?~
Ji 3d
wa"r
~ ~ r
~
euaWN
pp~~ CC hh ... /~~ ? r"
.x
TRA 14ty-
l
Exit-14
4 -...
y ..

Lr~
L
( [ht )o :Wr
`~ , WW •r 1~rcu~iarnl
ti:~

~~ ~ G~ ~~'• G ~
~. ,.
~,, ~ ~ .,~ ~„'~ ., . w~ ~ ~~i~
5 X11
..
.
,,.+ ~
-_ e
a
.
' ~ ~,.
,. n
(]
PS L Y ~.P r- - ~f~(3Z ~,e G~G'7'
Q, " . ,, . 1
- ~ ~~.~
~~. ~
_.-- - -
. _ ~ .,
_ . ..~ __
_ _ _ _ ,~ .
-- - - - ..~.-,x F~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'psi ~
,~
~, ~ A ~ ~ ~ :~T~ v
~.v
,,, ~
,,.--
:.
;.:1~~ •,' ~ .: r1-- °~~.1;~ k~e~wy§4 ' :.. , ;> ... -,... .rte" ' r'Ci^:~ ~ . , ~?,~~ . _ .. , ~''
~..~,1 ` .
u ~~ ~

''~=~
f a ~ ~~

~~ ~~ ~ ~
3 .
'
. ': ~.
~~G s
~{
\

Ce
~
R~-r G
`
G~C
L
. G~ U
~ ~
~i 1 _P~ .• -..
~n..

' ~
~ ~.
~
-
~~
G2 ~~~;~~:~ ~~
__
g2
- ~. a, ~ ~ . ~"

~ ~..
~.
_
-' -~ Honeycutt Greenway, Southern Section
--;~Ge~~/ USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970

~ ~•~-
~'' '~
~~ ~
1
,,
~ r,
~~ r
.•
M
;~.
,.
f ~ ~'
~(~~<<~
~ ~y
~~"~
\'~`\' ~

q ~~ ~ ~~, . - . .
..
. . +.
`~ , ~i
~~ _
lj~ O,•
..
~_._-._- a 1.
_ t
' ~~ (' ,/ ~' ~ Honeycutt Greenway, Southern Section
~-
- G, USGS Topo Quadrangle: Bayleaf NC t

Gem.. ~ ~,J ~- ~~~ 1< ~ r ~ G2 \.1. ~
> > ~ ~e
1 4 (
i
. ° 4. ~ (~
/y
f e
~E, / ...
.. (°'
r O
.-
_ ~ i ~ ,,i
..
p ~,~ ~_ ~ ,
R
G'~
. , ~.- =~
a (G3 ~~ ",~ ,L .~_ _~
_ ,, ~.
~ W\~
~_ _. eat c~~,,Q, Ge~,~\ i G 1i .
..
2 , r ~ ~' ' ~ `~~ ~~
„.
~~~ v ~ r _ ~~ \~ ~ ~`
..
~~ - . - ':' e t ,.
its ~~~ . ~ 's ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~~ r V~. ai- ~ ",~
',~ _~~ ~ ~ , '' ` G~,C,'~~ ~ i <~e,
e , ,.
,,~ r
~ ~ I i ` ~Q ~~ ~ .
~.
6
,,
..
} ~ ap ~ `.
a .~' ~~ ~ ,~~ _ ~ ,-
~~ -,
,-
a ~ ~ ~# * • LeG~
.,
+r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,
,,
~,
1
,. _
,., --
..
~.~
i
~'r ~1 ~,~~~, • ,~o ,~ ., ~ ,
y -Z- '~~ ~ ~. ~
~ _
oQ ~'~' 'r ~~ 5'y ,%' "o ~~,~' `~
~, Q ~ ~ ~ ;~
Ci
.,
., ~ ~ r ~~
..
°'
~, ~ s, ~ --,, ~,P
,,
p`3Z . ~ \ ~ . _ Fd
~,. ~ a
'", . ~
Ue~~ Gc%~ y~ ~ ~y
,.-~
P~ ~,~ 1t \, P~ ~
o -° _ - ,
~, ~: ~ c,, n, ~ ~.. ~ ..
ce ,/ ~,
~e~`,-'`-~ C'eC' ~~` ~. `' ~t''%~ Gel ~t
e~8 ~ k Gp
1_
~-~ .. ~~ . ~ , ~'p--~ ~t ~~~.
., ~.~~~, ~' Ps~~' ~.
Honeycutt Greenway, Middle Section i==' ~ ,c2 - ~'`~~~ .~
~~
cQ USDA Soil Survey of Wake County 1970 '' GEg~
~~-
a '~` - 3~ ~ eg ~:

C~~~~«~"'~S~~S1~1~/(ill(C~5~111 C
~'~
5
~~
~~~4
~
Z \ »
~ ~
. ~
,
'~C~

~1~.
~'` ;%
l~

~~ `, GQ4~
P ~f' t`s.
,-fit) ,.%~^:
~~~ ~'"~
\~~ ' ,r.
Gam.
,r / V
4 .. I

_~~.J
_,F
r
~_ "'s~
~ ~\~

`~\
B~.
/,

I
i
~1
/'c- ;~
35`
-~
~. ~
t
~(~
1~
Honeycutt Greenway, Northern Section
USGS Topo Quadrangle: Wake Forest NC

Table 1. Potential Streams and Wetlands in the Honeycutt Creek Greenway Project Corridor.
Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Mine Creek Watershed: Paved Trail -- Longstreet Drive north to Strickland Road
S-1 15+60 35.8746 Soil Eph: 3.5 No* None Dry s
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
W-GA
flag 1-12
S-8
W-GB
flag 1-16
S-9
W-GC
flag 1-3
S-10
S-11
5-12
S-13A
S-13B
5-14
S-15
5-16
78.6457
25+60 35.8769 Soil +Topo Per: 52.0 Yes
78.6457
39+00 35.8789 Soil +Topo Per: 45.5 Yes
78.6442
58+30 35.8807 Soil Eph: 7.0 No*
78.6421
61+50 35.8815 Soil +Topo Per: 47.0 Yes
78.6421
63+00 35.8820 Soil +Topo Per: 47.0 Yes
78.6420
east of 35.8820 neither Eph: 10.0 No
63+50 78.6418
78.6415
67+50 35.8830 Soil Int:24.5 Yes
78.6415
68+50 35.8832
70+50 35.8838 Soil +Topo Eph: 12.5 No*
78.6413
-

70+70
35.8839 _ ---
----
____
----
78.6413
83+40 35.8863 neither Eph: 11.5 No
78.6387
85+g0 35.8870 neither Eph: 10.0 No
78.6388
93+20 35.8884 Soil +Topo Per: 48.0 Yes
78.6376
93+80 35.8886 neither Eph: 14.5 No
78.6375
97+25 35.8891 neither Eph: 17.5 No
78.6367
99+50 35.8892 Soil Per: 34.0 Yes
78.6359
119+10 35.8910 Soil Int-Per: Yes
78.6361 29.0
128+70 35.8930 Soil Eph:O No*
78.6362
wale; New sidewalk on
channel indistinct Longstreet Dr
ACE 404-401 20-25' stream; Exist sidewalk on
bedr, cobl, sand Six Forks Rd
ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Exist sidewalk on
sand, grav Newton Rd
None riprap-lined Culvert 3-pipe, 18"
stormwater ditch HDPE, 18.2 ft
ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Bridge, no perm
sand, grav, cobl stream impact
ACE 404-401 15-20' stream; Bridge, no perm
sand, grav, cobl stream impact
None 2' non-wetland Avoid; No Impact
floodplain ditch
hardwood forest Perm Fill = 365 sq.ft
ACE 404-401 3-5' sandy stream Culvt 3-pipe, 24"
at wetland edge 1HDPE+rock, 45 ft

ACE 404-401 _._
bottomland - ---
Clear = 900 sq.ft,
hardwood forest No Perm. impact
None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 4-pipe, 16"
floodplain ditch ~
_---- HDPE, 29.2 ft
--
ACE 404-401 2-3' wetl ditch in Culvt 15" HDPE, 41'
L,..H....~1...,.7 I.7\77 n,...«.. Lill - in~1 ,... A
None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 1-pipe, 48"
ditch / Swale HDPE, 32.7 ft
None 2-3' non-wetland Culvert 1-pipe, 16"
ditch / Swale HDPE, 21.6 ft
ACE 404-401 6-12' stream; sand, Bridge, no perm
cobl, bedr stream impact
None 2' non-wetld Swale Boardwalk, no perm
stream impact
None 2-3' non-wetld Culvert 1-pipe, 24"
Swale HDPE, 19.8 ft
ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
silt, cobl, bedr stream impact
ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Exist sidewalk on
silt, cobl, bedr Mourning Dove
None No channel, Exist sidewalk on
buried/piped Running Cedar

Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Paved Trail -- Strickland Road north to Durant Road
S-20 161+50 35.8985 Soil Per: 39.5 Yes ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, No crossing, just
to 168 78.6312 cobl, bedr buffer impact
- - _ - --
W-GF 166+10 35.8985 ---- ____ ---- ACE 404-401 forested 3' linear Clear 84 sq.ft; Perm
flag 1-3 78.6313 seep wetland boardwalk = 36 sq.ft
W-GG
flag 1-15 167 to
168+50 35.8990
78.6308 ---- ____ ---- ACE 404-401 marsh at head of
Bent Tree Pond Avoid; No Impact
and ~ ~ 78.6308 ~ ~ Pond
5-21 dust west of 35.9003 Soil +Topo Int: 28.0 Yes
spillway 174+00 78.6305
5-22 174+50 35.9004 Soil +Topo Per: 42.5 Yes

___ 78.6305

W-GP
175+30
35.9005 - - --.
---- ~
____ ~
----
-7
5-23 176+20 35.9008 Soil +Topo Per: 49.0 Yes
78.6310
above. spillway perm water impact
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; bedr, No crossing, just
cobl, sand buffer impact
ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
_ _ _ --
DWQ isolated forested wetland (Clear 720 sq.ft; Perm
depression J boardwalk = 380 sq.ft
ACE 404-401 4-6' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
w-ux soutn or s~.yutz ---- ____ ----
flag 1-10 179+50 78.6319
5-24 180+70 35.9016 Soil +Topo Per: 46.5 Yes
78.6320
W-GJ flag west of 35.9017 ---- ____ ----
1-5, 50-54 181+50 78.6322
( Existing I-540 Greenway Tunnel = Sta 181+86 to 190+00 )
S-25A 190+30 35.9023 Soil Int 22.5 Yes
78.6312
S-25B 191+35 35.9024 Soil +Topo Per: 45.5 Yes
78.6310
5-26 201+70 35.9014 Soil Per: 35.5 Yes
78.628 8
W-GQ 1201+70 135.9014
r__ , , o
W-GK flag north of 35.9010 ---- ____ ----
1-12, 20-24 209+00 78.6274
S-27 209+20 35.9010 Soil Eph:O No*
78.6274
5-28 238+70 35.9085 Soil +Topo Int: 25.0 Yes
78.6210
S-29 251+70 35.9117 Soil Per: 40.0 Yes
78.6216
seep + depression No Perm. impact
ACE 404-401 6-9' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl, stream impact
ACE 404-401 forested wetland Avoid: No impact
seep + depression
ACE 404-401 1-2' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
cobl stream impact
ACE 404-401 5-8' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
grav, cobl stream impact
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream enters Wingwall +riprap at
marsh below culvt culvt out, Perm 8.5 ft
ACE 404-401 I Marsh scrub ~ Wingwall +riprap
ACE 404-401 Headwater seep; Avoid: No impact
marsh/ scrub
None Dry swale; No structure at
channel indistinct crossing
ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; bedr, 1-pipe 48" RCP +
sand, grav, rock, Perm = 56.0 ft
ACE 404-401 4-5' stream; sand, 1-pipe 48" RCP +
grav, cobl rock, Perm = 22.0 ft

Stream or Approx Decimal Soil or Stream Neuse ACE Jurisdic Stream or Wetland Proposed Stream or
Wetland # Station Lat +Lon Topo Map ID: Score Buffer or DWQ Description Wetland Impacts
Numbr Stream Isolated ?
Honeycutt Creek Watershed: Dirt Trail -- Durant Road north to Raven Ridge Road
S-30 264+90 35.9133 neither Eph: 17.5 No None 2-3' non-wetld No structure at
78.6211 Swale crossing
W-GL 268+50 35.9139 ---- ____ ---- ACE 404-401 forested 6' linear No structure at
flag 1-7 78.6206 seep wetland crossing
5-31 277+20 35.9159 Soil Per: 39.5 Yes ACE 404-401 4-5' stream, sand, Boardwalk, no perm
78.6192 grav, bedr l stream impact
5-32 289+50 35.9188 Soil +Topo Per: 51.5 Yes ACE 404-401 12-18' stream; I Boardwalk, no perm
78.6177 sand, grav, cobl stream impact
- ------
5-33 301+00 35.9209 Soil +Topo Per: 51.5 Yes ACE 404-401 12-18' stream; Boardwalk, no perm
78.6153 sand,-grav, cobl stream impact
5-34 308+70 35.9216 Soil Per: 34.0 Yes ACE 404-401 3-5' stream; sand, ~ Boardwalk, no perm
~ 78.6139 grav, cobl stream impact
W-GN 308+90 35.9217 ---- ____ ---- ~ ACE 404-401 Forested alluvial ~ Perm Boardwalk:
~ flag 1-7 78.6138 wetland 6 x 12 = 72 sq.ft
S-35 311+20 35.9220 Soil Eph: 6.0 No* None Dry Swale in No structure at
78.6133 ravine crossing
S-36 318+35 35.9233 neither Eph: 9.0 No None Dry Swale in i No structure at
78.6119 ravine crossing
S-37 324+50 35.9237 neither Eph: 10.0 No None Dry swale in No structure at
78.6099 ravine crossing
5-38 & 329+70 35.9236 neither Eph: 18.0 No ACE 404-401 10' mucky stream/ ','Perm Boardwalk:
W-GM 78.6085 (wetland) wetland complex 6 x 11 = 66 sq.ft wetl
-flag 15, 20
5-39 330+g0 35.9237 neither Int: 20.0 No ACE 404-401
2-3' stream; sand, Boardwalk, no perm
178.6083
- grav, cobl ~ stream impact
5-40 & 331+70 35.9239 Soil Int: 28.5 Yes ACE 404-401 10' mucky stream/ ''
Perm Boardwalk:
W-GM ~
fl
6
102 ~ 78.6081 (wetland) i
wetland complex ~', 6 x 22 = 132 sq.ft wetl,
ag
, ; ~ No stream impact
- _ _ - ----
S-41 342+50 35.9266 neither Eph: 13.0 No None Dry Swale in No structure at
78.6071 ravine crossing
Streams: This table includes all channels shown as streams on USGS Quads or USDA Soil Survey maps, plus
other channels not mapped by USGS or USDA for which RJG&A completed a stream rating form, and all
wetlands found during RJG&A field surveys in or adjacent to the project corridor.
* See Table in PCN Form for detailed Temporary, Permanent, and Total stream & wetland impacts.
Neuse Buffer: "No*" = Channel is ephemeral, piped or not present (RJG&A field determination), but is shown
on USDA soil survey map and DWQ must confirm that Neuse Buffer Rule does not apply.

Fig. 1
Fig. 9
Fig.
~4~d7
f~
a
Fig.
Fig.
Q{ the
N
}~ ~ Fig. 5
4
Figure 1. Honeycutt Greenway Key Map.
Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Buffer
Impacts.* Wake County, NC.
1
Inset Maps
3 N, e~Rd ~ Trail Alignment
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
~~^~~~_-i"`---._1- I "See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
~ • ~ acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
2 ~ ~ r'---i C°'° _~ areas in buffers.

B-4. Zone 2: 5,937 Sq. Ft.
B-3. Zone 1:397 Sq. Ft.
B-1. Zone 1:46 Sq. Ft.
m
X
T
O
F
N
Id
S-3
B-2. Zone 2: 1,633 Sq. Ft.
I S-2
Mine Grp
Figure 2. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
S-1
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
ee~p~~ Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
1 'See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

GC vv Gc
S-9
B-15. Zone 1:5,195 Sq. Ft.
S-8
B-14. Zone 1:3,707 Sq. Ft. L1
W-GA
S-6 S-7
B-11. Zone 1:625 Sq. Ft. --
B-13. Zone 2: 3,229 Sq. Ft.
B-10. Zone 2: 476 Sq. Ft~
I B-9. Zone 2: 474 Sq. Ft. ~
B-12. Zone 1:628 Sq. Ft.
~ B-7. Zone 1:692 Sq. Ft.
B-8. Zone 1:609 Sq. Ft.
S-5 B-6. Zone 2: 2,894 Sq. Ft.
S-4
~~~~ 1 B-5. Zone 1: 11,377 Sq. Ft.
B-4. Zone 2: 5,937 Sq. Ft.
B-3. Zone 1:397 Sq. Ft.
~ B-1. Zone 1:46 Sq. Ft. I
B-2. Zone 2:1,633 Sq. Ft.
Newton Rd
e
~~
y
y/`d7
Figure 3. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B-30. Zone 1:163 Sq. Ft.
B-29. Zone 2: 3,470 Sq. Ft.
B-28. Zone 1: 517 Sq. Ft.
B-27. Zone 1:65 Sq. Ft.
B-26. Zone 1: 110 Sq. Ft.
I S-11 l
B-24. Zone 1:301 Sq. Ft.
B-25. Zone 2: 3,594 Sq. Ft.
B-23. Zone 2: 2,221 Sq. Ft.
a
o:
>,
o~
S-10
B-22. Zone 1:2,130 Sq. Ft.
B-21. Zone 2: 6,607 Sq. Ft.
B-20. Zone 1:5,289 Sq. Ft.
~~e
Figure 4. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
~~ -Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
"See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
B-17. Zone 1:824 Sq. Ft.
B-16. Zone 1:279 Sq. Ft.
B-19. Zone 1:1,484 Sq. Ft.
B-18. Zone 2:15,830 Sq. Ft.
GC~ w-~c
s-s
B-15. Zone 1:5,195 Sq. Ft.
S-8

Figure 5. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
- --- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
P~ ~~ Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
S-16
Mourning Dove Rd.
S-15
a~
~~
aac
GQ'
.\~~
OC
~J
S-13B
B-38. Zone 2: 1,287 Sq. Ft.
B-39. Zone 1:962 Sq. Ft.
B-40. Zone 1:613 Sq. Ft.
B-34. Zone 2: 666 Sq. Ft.
I B-33. Zone 2: 926 Sq. Ft. ~
S-13A ~
B-32. Zone 1:1,175 Sq. Ft.
S-12
B-41. Zone 2: 492 Sq. Ft.
S-14
B-42. Zone 2:1,317 Sq. Ft.
'~ B-30. Zone 1:163 Sq. Ft. I
B-31. Zone 1:639 Sq. Ft.
B-29. Zone 2: 3,470 Sq. Ft.

B-62. Zone 2: 706 Sq. Ft.
B-61. Zone 1:843 Sq. Ft. \~
-._.r- ---..
` S-24
B-59. Zone 2:486 Sq. Ft.
B-60. Zone 1:666 Sq. Ft.
B-57. Zone 1:1,397 Sq. Ft.
S-23 g_55. Zone 2:1,121 Sq. Ft.
-~
oa B-58. Zone 2: 533 Sq. Ft.
W-GP
B-56. Zone 1:1,307 Sq. Ft.
S-22
B-54. Zone 1:630 Sq. Ft. - -"-
B-53. Zone 1:1,681 Sq. Ft.
B-52. Zone 2: 1,019 Sq. Ft.
s-21 u
B-51. Zone 1:1,018 Sq. Ft.
B-50. Zone 1:1,473 Sq. Ft.
B-49. Zone 2: 2,921 Sq. Ft.
B-48. Zone 1:3,849 Sq. Ft.
Figure 6. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
B-47. Zone 2: 958 Sq. Ft.
B-46. Zone 1:2,767 Sq. Ft.
c
2
W-GG
6 W-GF ~
G B-45. Zane 1:668 Sq. Ft.
\' -- ~--
B-44. Zone 2: 6,077 Sq. Ft.
B-43. Zone 1:982 Sq. Ft.

B-64. Zone 2: 911 Sq. Ft.
S-25B
B-65. Zone 1:598 Sq. Ft.
B-66. Zone 2: 401 Sq. Ft.
B-67. Zone 2:1,668 Sq. Ft.
B-68. Zone 1: 110 Sq. Ft.
B-69. Zone 2:1,107 Sq. Ft.
B-63. Zone 1:1,720 Sq. Ft. B-70. Zone 1:1,011 Sq. Ft.
B-61. Zone 1:843 Sq. Ft. boo
~ B-71. Zone 1:1,578 Sq. Ft.

S-24 .4
04
~'~,^o - ~e

B-74. Zone 2:139 Sq. Ft.
`O-F S-26
B-59. Zone 2: 486 Sq. Ft.
--
W-GQ
B-57. Zone 1:1,397 Sq. Ft.
S-23 g_55. Zone 2:1,121 Sq. Ft.
B-58. Zone 2: 533 Sq. Ft.
W-G P
B-72. Zone 2:1,651 Sq. Ft.
B-56. Zone 1:1,307 Sq. Ft.
G S-22
B-73. Zone 2: 387 Sq. Ft.
~
~ S-27
B-54. Zone 1:630 Sq. Ft. ~~
=~
B-53. Zone 1:1,681 Sq. Ft.
B-52. Zone 2: 1,019 Sq. Ft.
Figure 7. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
S-21 8-51. Zone 1: 1,018 sq. Ft. Wake County, NC.
W --~T Roads
B-50. Zone 1:1,473 Sq. Ft.
Permanent Trail Footprint
®Zone 1 Impacts (Temp
& Perm
)
B-49. Zone 2: 2,921 Sq. Ft. .
.
B
48
Z
1
849 S
3
Ft ®Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
-
.
one
:
,
q.
.
Surveyed Top of Streambank
B-47. Zone 2: 958 Sq. Ft. B08rdW81k N
_„ Bridge
B-46. Zone 1:2,767 Sq. Ft. ee//G
~o~
~-----~ Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
e`2
d
y
Wetlands
GF W-GG
Feet
0 100 200 400
W-GF * See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
B-45. Zone 1; 668 Sq. Ft. acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B-80. Zone 1:1,367 Sq. Ft. L
S
0
m
c
I~
B-78A. Zone 1:748 Sq. Ft. L
B-77B. Zone 1:907 Sq. Ft.
B-77A. Zone 2: 577 Sq. Ft.
S-30
B-79. Zone 2: 2,342 Sq. Ft.
B-78B. Zone 2: 294 Sq. Ft.
S-29
0
m
a
B-76B. Zone 2: 525 Sq. Ft.
B-76A. Zone 1:902 Sq. Ft.
S-28 - Lonik_e.`pr.
-- B-756. Zone 1:683 Sq. Ft.
B-75A. Zone 2: 448 Sq. Ft.
Figure 8. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
~~1/~ Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
` Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

B-94. Zone 2: 5,711 Sq. Ft.
B-93. Zone 1:23 Sq. Ft.
B-90. Zone 1:95 Sq. Ft.
~ B-88. Zone 1:299 Sq. Ft. 1
~ B-87. Zone 2:1,001 Sq. Ft. ~
B-86. Zone 1: 4 Sq. Ft.
B-84. Zone 1:912 Sq. Ft.
B-82. Zone 1:2,929 Sq. Ft.
S-31
J B-85. Zone 2:1,996 Sq. Ft.
B-83. Zone 2: 825 Sq. Ft.
W-G L
B-92. Zone 1:1,263 Sq. Ft.
i B-91. Zone 2:1,809 Sq. Ft.
B-89. Zone 1:386 Sq. Ft.
J~~
` G Figure 9. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
eao
L
° Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts
~o Wake County, NC.
Roads
B-81. Zone 2:1,523 Sq. Ft. ~ Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
8-80. zone 1:1,367 Sq. Ft. S
30 ~ Zone 2 Impacts (Temp
& Perm
)
- .
.
Surveyed Top of Streambank

0
_ -Boardwalk N
Bridge
~ ----
n B-79. Zone 2: 2,342 sq. Ft. --~--- Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
~~,~~~ Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
aura
nt Rd acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
. areas in buffers.

W-G N
B-112. Zone 1:219 Sq. Ft.
~ B-107. Zone 1:483 Sq. Ft. l
B-106. Zone 2: 1,376 Sq. Ft.
B-105. Zone 1:968 Sq. Ft. (,
B-104. Zone 2: 369 Sq. Ft. !,
B-103. Zone 2:1,915 Sq. Ft.
B-111. Zone 1:256 Sq. Ft.
B-110. Zone 2: 94 Sq. Ft. ~ ~ I S-34
S-33
~ B-109. Zone 2: 323 Sq. Ft. I
B-102. Zone 1:2,450 Sq. Ft.
B-101. Zone 2: 453 Sq. Ft.
B-100. Zone 2: 400 Sq. Ft.
B-99. Zone 1: 448 S . Ft~
B-98. Zone 1:512 Sq. Ft. (
~ B-108. Zone 1:481 Sq. Ft. ~
Figure 10. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
B-97. Zone 2: 537 Sq. Ft. `'~ Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts.*
s-32 Wake County, NC.
Roads
B-96. Zone 1:812 Sq. Ft. ~ permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
B-95. Zone 1:508 Sq. Ft.

U Surveyed Top of Streambank
-Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
B-94. Zone 2: 5,711 Sq. Ft.
'Wetlands
a~
~
Feet
~a
° 0 100 200 400
B-93. Zone 1:23 Sq. Ft. ~
~ "
~~ See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
~ acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
~ areas in buffers.

S-37 i
S-36
B-112. Zone 1:219 Sq. Ft.
B-113. Zone 1:84 Sq. Ft.
S-35
S-34
W GN
B-111. Zone------1---: 256 Sq. Ft.
B-110. Zone 2: 94 Sq. Ft.
Figure 11. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland,
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
#~,~ Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
* See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.

Figure 12. Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland
Stream, and Riparian Buffer Impacts'`
Wake County, NC.
Roads
Permanent Trail Footprint
® Zone 1 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
® Zone 2 Impacts (Temp. & Perm.)
Surveyed Top of Streambank
- Boardwalk N
Bridge
Stream Centerline (Wake Co. GIS)
~;
,~,. Wetlands
Feet
0 100 200 400
See table for stream impact lengths, wetland impact
acreage, and permanent versus temporary impact
areas in buffers.
S-41
b
Q
Q~
J
O
B-116. Zone 1:353 Sq. Ft.
I S-37 l
B-115. Zone 1:299 Sq. Ft. r I q g_117. Zone 2:85 Sq. Ft.
B-114. Zone 2: 92 Sq. Ft.
1 W-GM2 I
S-40
W-GM 1
w
~m~

,~ / +~
~ ~ ; ~ r q:
~~ , ' ~ . ~W
~, o
f t ~"~ o
4. ? ~ ~~"
... , ~ j " " ! ~ ~ '. ~
i ~
y
Y
1t
~ ~ i .
~C
II S' '~~,
WKNLi tLMb
z ~'' I
~,! ~~, ~_ ~~, .~ Perm = . Oo~~! At,
l ~:
46
3 ~ ~ \t ~ <
A "
~" 9
'~ "y'e ~uii.'
~ M ,. w -GB T~n~P oao7 Ac
~: s f
,,~~ r
Pervh . none
.a:' ~+ ~~
! ~t~.
4! •1 ~+l
t ' Nlt tAr ,Y'
44 !( ,
t;
5 "t ~
f ~
" ~~ Si S
by ' //
I J 1'
~' i ..
;, 0{9a Ac
::t ~r~ Fill
6~ r
~~
f fir jsy" ~a°'~- (,~f~~~~tWRy
}}} ; ~oRRtI~OR
' ~ _
_~ r
~ ~ " Y
3 ~~ ~~~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~
~~z~
{4 ` + ~
1 i P `
r
~~ f .~
~ ~.~ ~~ ~ Figure 13. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GA, GB, GC
s &. .,
.~ r.~ /,•

ti ~ ~ '~ f
f ~ ~~
f 1
~ 11 / ~ t~,
L., ///~ 1 ~ i ~
1 /' t
} ~[•§~
' ~ '~/I '~l ' tIp
NOW OR -.
~ ... ~ . ., .. ..,. ,-w. r.. .... ,
r ~....:.daz ~ f 3 • _ ~ _., .. ~, ,
,~ ~, Sr ~~"1! ,
..
t • t.,
s ~s k ~~
t ~~~~
NOW OR FORMERLY ,. „~ ,~ '\
( Li'~~gf
S~'
j I -~
G~~~Nw11Y =; ~
OR FORMERLY ~•^" ~ `~~• •'^~~) 4{ 7 ~ i; ~.. ~ ~ 2 ,
J) .. •.
a,
' ~ ~ ~ cr 4.
3 ~'
(~° ~ • w ~~
I
~.
Now oa~FOtlMExLr ~T
i i h,~ a m~i - a
~ ~ 1,1~ „svr.a NOW Ott fONWExLY '
•~ ~~ ~ ~~r~. ~: .z. 777 ~ 'Mai ~~`~~~ I~. F t t r
G:, ~ ~~
NOW OR FORMENIY ~ ~ '~'
._ ,;tt ,,,!~ ~ mm ,
~~ ~~, 7! ~~~••,, MOW OR FORMERLY
i ~' J Q~°;
1 ~~ w msa ~w~ ~ ~ #
~' . ~/ p, ..tlGh. f , t m.. , C
,.
rr a `
NO
>~' iar vk~uw~ ~
.c
~~~~ ` ,' 4
TAP ~ ,~ol~ ~~. ~1. ..,~ ~ ~,°~ ..._..~, ~~ -
NOW OR FORMERLY
_ ,.
Nl~i~ F6
., r
q ~ ~ ` ~~ , ' Ill': r.
'¢~
6
~ ' ~ Figure 14. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GF, GG
;•; ,

~ ~ i
~~'~r
P
~:{ ~ v
s, ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: f ~~,,
~ ~
j ,,E,1 , ,. ~ ~~-~~~
~ ~~
i . ~ ; ~. {,
/r ti
~ , ~, ,.
i " '~ ' ° 100 Fr:
~~~ ~+'
~' i ~ \ ~ i
~ ~~ •
S'+.t ~ ~ ;
~t l ~ i~ ~ ~ ~"~
1~ ~ I ,~ ~ ~ , ~'~ I
~ `' ~laif
i - 5°a~ ' ~,'~ GpNS'cRUC7taN
h ~ f.~ ; ~ f ,~ Cb~Rt~4R
;V ~ '~ ` ~ ~~``
_ ~~~ ~ ry~"~ ,f~ ,,/ 'vF_cP,
~ ~ f ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~n ~ ~. ~
~~ ~ 4. I~ 666_
/ ~
4 , z ~, al ~ ,~~ _ ~.~-.----~..
,, ~ `
. i ~
~i I ~ ~ '
l
~ ~ ~~ •~
~.i 1
1 ~ iJj` ~ + '~ 1
' ~. ~.. t I ~ 4.f ~4f~ ~
t {
i ~ ` ~ i s
7 r"
~. ..,
)W OR Fp,RME~iLY ~ ; j ~ _. ,: .,-r _ m. -;, , ~', -, .. _ ( .~.
.,.::
. , , ~ 1
,., ~
_. .
:>
,,.
~, k-~,
~.~=~ B~lr TRH 1~HD
Figure 15. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GP „'
_:~ ~.~ .

~ t
~ I t ~ +~~~ s~ t~ r ~yE
n`~ ~e t ~~~ ,/ 1 ! t~~"
~ ~ ,~ ~ ~{ ,,, ~ - s
~.
,:
~ .+t,~ ~ . .,, . ~r ii ~. t w ~ ;a _
• ~ • ~ ~ ~ _ .,~ r.,
~o y~su /~ ,
. ~ GRiENWI~Y
`,~ ~~ ~ CC~T~~T`~i,~;G"t'Ept~J
III ~ r~~t '~~ ~ ~Ot~Ri!~oR f
,~ ;
E, 1 ~~ ~
~ i :, ''~
~ ~ ~ ~ e.,, ~ }.
~: [ l ~ 1 r .1 j I ~ ; ~ ~
B~
t,. ~ ` r, 1 tl l t !:
/ ~ ~ "
.l:Y / ~ ~ ~' '~ ~. t .,~,r ~ r ~~~ ~ r,~ j ~
1 '~~ ,~ t ~~ i~~ ~~~ A\\
I y~..GN9 ~ ~~ ~I r ~ { ~•~
{ of -GH 11 ~y ~~
'ut lint i '-~
;, ~ W•G ,{ ~ ,~
3 , ,
04 7 S 7..: }~ K .
I ~sr~
i."C ~ ~ t{S r C ~i. 41 -. ~ 1. ~ •'~
I
i ~~~~ '' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ -
,~-~ ~ ° ~-~, _ ~~/ . ,~ . i° ; "~, 1,
' t' ~ .~~
~'\
y I :.I ~.f. ~'
..~ i~ r,_
~y
~:; ~F.
Figure 16. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetlands GH, GJ
d
~° `'

f/
s.
winjoll + Riprap
GREENWAY
tFr
ll! 100 FT
Figure 17. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GQ

1
'` !
`
!
. i ~
~~
~
~
~. ' i
1f ~ ,
r /
t ~ ''~ I
~''
~
i' ~
' ~` ,
~~,.
~ ~ i

~..
~~ f
`
` ,
~`,
~ /

~
' .
1
~
> 1
.

ci `
Qf
rt x,,, ~
I
~ ,'' ~..
O `• '; ~
~
3
'
+~, `
.,\
.. 3 }~
~
,
V ~\
~
1 i
~
1_'1 ~ .a , •ti
~ ~~ P~ ~ 1~ ~ ~

I ~tt ( (
1
~ `~ '~ i
~~~
~ ~ !
~,. r ~ l\
f
j
f{
f
////
i : ~ //
~'ij ~
!.~ ff.
~
.. `
//~
i'/ `n
t
~
~- ~ /
'

ry~~~ ~

i ' ~~. ` ~ .~
~ ~ ~
` Dir~E ~i( Wil
~,
,
~~,
~.,, `~
~~~ ; , cross
but- ho
~
~
,
~, .
.
~ ~, / ~ ~ ~ i t' 1+~ i..
~
~i l~~
~~
~

y~µ
7L. ry
+
p
y
f~ ~r
~' ~ ~
~
.
+l
G
l
/ !
r ~~~ ~,
;~;~ heede
~
~
~
t ~ ~/ ~~ t
' ~
i ~ '
~ ,
Dirt
~
r
~~ ~ {f
Tr~~l
,
.
,
~ ~ ; ,~ _
l
~

~
~~
~~ ~ ~
~
r
L
l~o { ~
1

{ /
f
~. ~ rf -
\
~
~ ~
~, ~~ ~~ ~
~
u ,. ~ e 7
.. ....... ._
`, ~ F
.:.~ ~' ~ O

1
'~$ ~1 - Figure 18. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GL
~
~ ,
1' ^~~` ~

%~
~::} ..S
...-.
r~
~~,
lS{ ~, ~:
1~4~r~- j
<.~ g. ~ ( _
~. ~
S ~~,' o t
j i ~ d
t 1 ~y ; ~~1 } J ~ + bf/r
6
t 3 ~ ~ ~t
....~ '
,, w
~, ~ Peer = . Q~t7 Ac,
3~ Baar~wa(k
S- f-•~N~ } ,~
', '; ~ I
wr•-t~Nq °
~:
~. ~},
Dirt ° ~ ~ ~ ~ •
,a,, ~
~' • ~ ~
iY+l ~ ~O '
~{ ~} j .- t } ~ r
jt„° J ~ 1~
i~
z ~ ..
~~ ,~ ~` ,,
jf
9
1 ~
,~_~~`'°
9~1' ~,~,
,_; ...
' ~ ~
~' ~ ~~- ~ 100 FT
i
1
''1 ., ~~ 7 1 I •
'~` ~ .ia •' y ~..
,. 4~~ `,; c Figure 19. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GN
.~ ,~ ,,
o

r;
! .1 > ,~
' r.,
r: ;
~~ r + ~"
-d
~
~ o r<1
' ° ~ ~ ~ ~ t
.
E i
fir
~, ~ I .' , i
i
E ~ ~ 1 h.
`\
•
"-.. ~~,,,,,,,".y '~ ` s l~ E ~1
'V!t~.l 1 1 :1 r 1, t
E I .,,~ ~,.. ~+ r
H'

ar
.g ~ ~ ~? ~ ~ ~~r~ IrQ~I
} ~ X
~~
rr
~
,
r:.
~
~- ~~~~
~

4
"

{
- .0030
`~;
PQP'VY1
r'
~~
Q- t
~ GHItlt
`-:-~-._~_ '' ~ 8 oa~z! walk
;
.
,
i '
.-~' ~
~ ~
V~' Gn7- .' Zl~ GNItl3" ~. ,#Vf GM4 ~~~0
. V!' GN8 C GH1 't '
. '~ ;

~cx,~~ii tltaastra [ `a9J.. ~ Vf GH27 ! }3~.
~ ~~ ~ .
r r

r.~ f GHi3 -
~/~" ~':HI? t
~ ~'>~
'~''~ 5 „ v GH9 P~.
' i rj
~~~ .
~
~ Vf ~@2 ~~1
r
j
.,
4 f '.'~ ~ v ~GHfi ~ GH
~ 5~3~
11.; Vf GN14 ~l~. ~ ,3.,

yr c!+
15
'"
v ~---. W-GM
Perm ~ . 0015 Ac.
" ,, WP :GH19 1VF GHl6 8V1A 7~^~~

r r ! Vf GNl6 ~ ~ r`'
VF GN17 ~ ' ~ '
~ ~
160 FT

}, n
1'~` ..
O .:! ~...

O
O

Figure 20. Wetland Impact Close-up Maps: Wetland GM

i
i
~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~~

~~ ~~ ~~
~~
~~ ~~ ~
~~ ~~
~ ~~ K
~~~
~~~
~g ~
~~ ~~~
~~
~` ~~~
;~
,
;

r
f
,.... i
4
~ ~~

~

~
~ ~ S~ ~~ ~
c~~(1~~i '~j'~+
+++ r
~
.
~
N

~ ~ ~ ~
*@ 'i
~
~
$
~`' m
QyyQ
LC~

A

~ ~ ~~
~
~~
~~
~~
~E
~ ~ ~~~
~ ~~ ~~
~~
~~
~ ~
~~ f.. '~7
~ ~' ~~ ; .
l.. n
I
~ ~e ~ ~ ~ q
f , _ ..
__
~~
f......., _i
i
!e ~
~~
~ ...; ..
..... L.....
w
i1 i
°i i
E
i ~~
~~. ,
~ i~
t~
t
i
tS i~
,~
~~
~~
i
.,~
~~
E an~mwr...-.
tt.o' f•..a• rro r.a• : i~..r r..r r~• ~~..rr

N a ~rr
n
~~ 9
O
~`
z '~
°~
7Cy ~,
~~ ~ ro
~ '~ a
R•~.~Q.
a'
~,.
0.1`
1
1:
M'

D
~~
~~
5~0
z

`~
;~.
:`\.
~~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~
~w
_~
,~
~,
~~
~u
x ,~~
O ~'
~ ~~o
~ ~~~
.. _~ ~•_s. ~.

i~ ~~~~N ~~ ~4l
~ ~ ~
4
~n
L~ 5LLLLL~ y
;. ~'~v {a
So

:: ~ ,~
~~

N [o~
r
yy
k ~! 6
~ N ~~~
.~'~ /
s ;-
QQ:
S =7
~~
11 1
d~

~.

...... _ ____.~
__-
2'-lU'
~..I
~
~' ~~_~•

~~ ~ 1
_ ~~
v~
a

--- ~ ~~ -I~~._-. ._.._
~ _~..~~
~~ 3a 3~ 1
t ~~ ~~ x~~
~a~
~~
~,~
x
a
2
a

Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts

Buffer Im act #

Reason for Impact

Stream Name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(sq. ft.)
Zone 2 impact
(sq. ft.)

B
1 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
k
Mi
C Yes 46 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 0

B
2 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 1,632
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 1

B
3 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 221 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 176 0

B
4 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 2,649
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 3,288

B
5 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
k
Mi
C Yes 7,522 0
- T Fi ure 3 ree
ne No 4,077 0

B
6 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 2,154
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 740

B
7 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
5 Yes 702 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
r,
- No 0 0

B
8 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
5 Yes 549 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
r,
- No 70 0

g
B P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 311
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 163

B
10 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 0 299
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 177

B
11 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
6 Yes 537 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
r,
- No 99 0

B
12 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
6 Yes 638 0
- T Fi ure 3 ne
r,
- No 0 0

B
13 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 2,452
- T Fi ure 3 ne
ree No 0 777

B-14 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
8 Yes 2,270 0
T Fi ure 3 ne
r,
- No 1,646 0

B
15 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S
8 Yes 3,062 0
- T Fi ure 3, 4 ne
r,
- No 2,161 0

B-16 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 58 0
T Fi ure 4 ne
ree No 221 0

B 17 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 0 9,875
T Fi ure 4 ne
ree No 0 5,956
B
18 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Mi
C Yes 388 0
- T Fi ure 4 ne
reek No 436 0

B-19 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C Yes 798 0
T Fi ure 4 ne
reek No 686 0

B-20 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C Yes 3,138 0
T Fi ure 4 ne
reek No 2,151 0

B-21 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi Yes 0 2,468
T Fi ure 4 ne Creek No 0 4,139
B-22 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Mi Yes 677 0
T Fi ure 4 ne Creek No 1,453 0

B-23 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi Yes 0 1,588
T Fi ure 4 ne Creek No 0 633

B 24 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 172 0
T Fi ure 4 Mine Creek No 129 0

B-25 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C Yes 0 3,199
T Fi ure 4 ne
reek No 0 395

Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts

Buffer Im act #

Reason for Impact

Stream Name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(sq. ft.)
Zone 2 impact
(sq. ft.)

B
26 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 108 0
- T Fi ure 4 ne
ree No 2 0

B
27 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 10 0
- T Fi ure 4 ne
ree No 55 0

B
28 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 509 0
- T Fi ure 4 ne
ree No 8 0

B
29 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
k
C Yes 0 3,129
- T Fi ure 4, 5 ne
ree No 0 341

B
30 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 41 0
- T Fi ure 5 ne
ree No 122 0

B
31 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
12
C
S Yes 650 0
- T Fi ure 5 ne
r,
- No 0 0

B
32 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
12
S Yes 1,127 0
- T Fi ure 5 ne
r,
- No 58 0

B-33 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 0 664
T Fi ure 5 ne
ree No 0 262

B
34 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 0 335
- T Fi ure 5 ne
ree No 0 331

B 38 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
k Yes 0 918
T Fi ure 5 ne
ree No 0 369

B-39 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
14
S Yes 917 0
T Fi ure 5 ne
r,
- No 59 0

B
40 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi
C
S Yes 623 0
- T Fi ure 5 ne
r,
-14 No 0 0
B-41 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Mi Yes 0 308
T Fi ure 5 ne Creek No 0 184

B-42 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
Mi Yes 0 843
T Fi ure 5 ne Creek No 0 474

B-43 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 982 0
T Fi ure 6 oneycutt Cr No 0 0

B-44 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 5,753
T Fi ure 6 Honeycutt Cr No 0 324

B-45 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 668 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 0

B-46 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 2,789 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 Honeycutt Cr No 0 0

B 47 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 958
T Fi ure 6, 7 Honeycutt Cr No 0 0
B-48 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 3,675 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 gentTree Pond No 174 0

B-49 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
B Yes 0 1,795
T Fi ure 6, 7 entTree Pond No 0 1,131
B-50 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 1,483 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 BT Pond, S-21 No 2 0

B-51 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 953 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 BT Pond, S-21 No 76 0

B 52 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 691
T Fi ure 6, 7 Honeycutt Cr No 0 328
B-53 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 1,378 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 Honeycutt S-22 No 343 0

Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts

Buffer Im act #

Reason for Impact

Stream Name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(sq. ft.)
Zone 2 impact
(sq. ft.)

B
54 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
22
tt S Yes 640 0
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
- No 0 0

B
55 P 10-ftTrad.Greenwa
H
tt C Yes 0 1,121
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
r No 0 0

B
56 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
23
tt S Yes 1,318 0
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
- No 0 0

B
57 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
23
tt S Yes 1,408 0
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
- No 0 0

B
58 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt C Yes 0 533
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
r No 0 0

B-59 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt C Yes 0 486
T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
r No 0 0

B-60 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt S
24 Yes 676 0
T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
- No 0 0

B
61 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
t
24
S Yes 855 0
- T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycu
t
- No 0 0

B 62 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
t C Yes 0 706
T Fi ure 6, 7 oneycut
r No 0 0

B
63 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
S
25A Yes 1,731 0
- T Fi ure 7 oneycut
- No 0 0

B
64 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
C Yes 0 911
- T Fi ure 7 oneycutt
r No 0 0

B-65 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
S
2 Yes 608 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycut
-
5B No 0 0

B-66 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 401
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 0

B 67 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 768
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 925

B-68 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 110 0

B-69 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 416
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 691

B 70 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 500 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt S-26 No 527 0

B-71 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 767 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt S-26 No 1,022 0

B 72 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 584
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 1,067

B-73 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 387
B-74 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 7 oneycutt Cr No 0 139

B-75A P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 297
T Fi ure 7 Honeycutt Cr No 0 151

B 75B P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 7 Honeycutt S-28 No 683 0

B-76A P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 515 0
T Fi ure 7 Honeycutt S-28 No 419 0
B-76B P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa Yes 0 392
T Fi ure 7 Honeycutt Cr No 0 133

Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts

Buffer Im act #

Reason for Impact

Stream Name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(sq. ft.)
Zone 2 impact
(sq. ft.)

B
A P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt C Yes 307
-77 T Fi ure 7 oneycu
r No 270

6 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
29
S Yes 461
B-77 T Fi ure 7 oneycutt
- No 446

B
78A P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt S
29 Yes 403
- T Fi ure 7 oneycu
- No 345

B
786 P 10-ft Trad.Greenwa
H
tt C Yes 290
- T Fi ure 7 r
oneycu No 294

79
8 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 8, 9 oneycu
r No 0 2,342

B
80 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 1,367 0

B
81 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 0 1,523

B
82 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 2,929 0

B
83 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 0 825

B
84 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 912 0

8
85 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 0 1,996

B
86 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 4 0

B
87 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 0 1,001

B
88 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt S
31 Yes 182 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
- No 122 0

B
89 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
31
S Yes 237 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycutt
- No 155 0

B
90 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycutt
r No 95 0

B
91 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycutt Cr No 0 1,809

B
92 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
tt C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9 oneycu
r No 1,263 0

B
93 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9, 10 oneycutt
r No 23 0

B
94 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
C Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 9, 10 oneycutt
r No 0 5,711

B
95 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 508 0

B
96 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 812 0

B-97 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 0 537

B
98 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 496 0
- T Fi ure 10 oneycutt S-32 No 16 0

99
B P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 438 0
- T Fi ure 10 Honeycutt S-32 No 10 0

Honeycutt Greenway Riparian Buffer Impacts by Buffer Zone and Temporary vs Permanent Impacts

Buffer Im act #

Reason for Impact

Stream Name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1 impact
(sq. ft.)
Zone 2 impact
(sq. ft.)

B-100 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
C Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt
r No 0 400

B-101 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H
C Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt
r No 0 453

B-102 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 2,450 0
B-103 P 6-ft Natural Trail H
C Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt
r No 0 1,915

B
104 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
- T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 0 369

B-105 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 968 0

B-106 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 0 1,376

B-107 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 491 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt S-33 No 0 0

B-108 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 61 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt S-33 No 420 0

B-109 P 6-ft Natural Trail
H Yes 0 0
T Fi ure 10 oneycutt Cr No 0 323
B-110 P 6-ft Natural Trail H Yes 0
T Fi ure 10, 11 oneycutt Cr No g4
B-111 P 6-ft Natural Trail H Yes 206
T Fi ure 10, 11 oneycutt S-34 No 50

B-112 P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 169
T Fi ure 10, 11 Honeycutt S-34 No 50
B-113 P 6-ft Natural Trail H Yes p
T Fi ure 11 oneycutt Cr No 84
B-114 P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 0
T Fi ure 12 Honeycutt Cr No 94
B-115 P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 266
T Fi ure 12 Honeycutt S-40 No 33
B-116 P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 324
T Fi ure 12 Honeycutt S-40 No 29
B-117 P 6-ft Natural Trail Yes 0
T Fi ure 12 Honeycutt Cr No 85
Permanent 49,443 49,223
Temporary 29,972 45,007
Perm + Temp 79,415 94,240

Discussion of Unavoidable Impacts and Alternatives to Riparian Buffer Encroachment.
Greenway Buffer Zones Reasoning for Unavoidable Impacts
Station No. Im acted
Sta 51+19 to Zone 2 Buffer An existing apartment complex lays to the east of the proposed
Sta 52+08 greenway from Sta 50+00 to approximately Sta 67+50. Moving
the greenway out of the riparian buffer will encroach into the slope
of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment building and
otentiall 'eo ardize cleanouts on an existin sewer service line.
Sta 52+50 to Zone 2 Buffer Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 52+85 into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
buildin .
Sta 52+85 to Zone 1 and Moving the greenway out of the riparian buffer would encroach
Sta 61+00 Zone 2 Buffer into the slope of fill material supporting the adjacent apartment
buildings and pool complex. The selected route protects a number
of s ecimen trees.
Sta 61+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 61+80
Sta 61+80 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway makes a near U-turn in an area void of trees.
Sta 62+60
Sta 62+50 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 63+40
Sta 63+40 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway makes perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 63+80
Sta 64+50 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway begins turning in order to minimize impacts to
Sta 66+00 u stream wetland areas and occu a sewer easement.
Sta 66+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Greenway occupies the edge of an existing sewer easement
Sta 70+00 scheduled for clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer
easement eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to
construct the reenwa .
Sta 70+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway turns away from the sewer easement to avoid sensitive
Sta 70+50 areas within the sewer easement
Sta 71+00 to Zone 1 and Greenway occupies an existing sewer easement scheduled for
Sta 79+25 Zone 2 Buffer clearing in the near future. Occupying the sewer easement
eliminates the need for additional clearing in order to construct the
greenway. At 74+50 greenway begins following an existing
cleared area within the buffers.
Sta 79+25 to Zone 1 and Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers and makes use
Sta 83+50 Zone 2 Buffer of an existing culvert pipe. Moving outside the buffers will require
clearin of existin trees.
Sta 84+75 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway follows a cleared area within the buffers. Moving
Sta 86+25 outside the buffers will re uire clearin of existin trees.
Sta 87+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway resides within an existing greenway easement while
Sta 89+30 followin a route that reserves s ecimen trees.
Sta 90+40 to Zone 1 Buffer Greenway follows path of least resistance leaving Old Deer Trail
Sta 90+90 to avoid specimen trees and residences.
Page 1 of

Sta 90+90 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail placed in existing greenway easement. Proximity of
Sta 92+90 easement to stream bank at upstream location requires crossing
East Fork Mine Creek. Buffer encroachment needed to begin
crossin .
Sta 90+90 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 94+10
Sta 94+10 to Zone 2 Buffer Completing the perpendicular crossing of East Fork Mine Creek.
Sta 94+50
Sta 96+75 to Zone 2 Buffer Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 96+95
Sta 96+95 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 97+65
Sta 97+65 to Zone 2 Buffer End perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 97+85
Sta 98+35 to Zone 2 Buffer Begin perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 99+00
Sta 99+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 100+90
Sta 100+90 to Zone 2 Buffer End perpendicular crossing of tributary of East Fork Mine Creek
Sta 100+25
Sta 100+65 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail placed in existing greenway easement to avoid encroachment
Sta 101+41 onto rivate ro erty and the house located on the ro ert .
Sta 159+92 to Zone 2 Buffer Steep lateral slopes are prevalent in this section of the greenway.
Sta 161+84 Specimen trees were selected for preservation and the greenway
ali nment was selected to reserve these trees.
Sta 161+84 to Zone 1 Buffer Like the previous Zone 2 encroachment, steep lateral slopes and
Sta 162+35 preservation of selected trees resulted in a greenway alignment
encroaching into Zone 1. Existing development prohibited shifting
the reenwa further from the adjacent stream.
Sta 162+35 to Zone 2 Buffer Existing development and steep lateral slopes necessitate the
Sta 164+99 encroachment into Zone 2. Boardwalk commences at Sta
163+29.06 to minimize impacts and negotiate both lateral and
lon itudinal slo es.
Sta 164+99 to Zone 1 Buffer Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
Sta 165+52 trees necessitate encroachment into Zone 1 with boardwalk.
Sta 165+52 to Zone 2 Buffer Existing development (parking lot) and preservation of specimen
Sta 165+85 trees necessitate encroachment into Zone 2 with boardwalk and to
commence crossin of stream feature.
Sta 165+85 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessary to cross a small stream.
Sta 167+25
Sta 167+25 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as the greenway works its way
Sta 167+73 from a stream crossin .
Sta 167+73 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 buffer encroachment needed to separate greenway from
Sta 169+86 existing residential lots. Greenway meanders through an area
adjacent to a small pond but absent of trees, thus eliminating the
need for clearing. Boardwalk, begun at Sta 163+29.06, ends at Sta
169+63.58 and aved reenwa commences.
Page 2 of 5

Sta 169+86 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway encroaches Zone 2 as it makes its way out of the buffer.
Sta 170+39
Sta 170+39 to No buffer
Sta 171+04 encroachment
Sta 171+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway encroaches Zone 2 in existing cleared area as it begins
Sta 171+38 its alignment to cross the emergency spill way of the small pond in
the area. Be in boardwalk Sta 171+30.32.
Sta 171+38 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross the
Sta 172+82 emergency spillway of the small pond in the area and keep
greenway within an area void of trees. End boardwalk at Sta
172+69.28 and be in aved reenwa .
Sta 172+82 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 173+OS buffers.
Sta 173+OS to No buffer
Sta 173+23 encroachment
Sta 173+23 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to cross
Sta 173+51 another stream.
Sta 173+51 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross an existing
Sta 174+90 stream. End avement at Sta 173+98.70 and be in boardwalk.
Sta 174+90 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway crosses stream but
Sta 174+46 then turns to cross another drama e feature.
Sta 174+46 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to cross stream.
Sta 177+04 Boardwalk still em to ed for reenwa .
Sta 177+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 177+30 buffers.
Sta 177+30 to No buffer
Sta 180+06 encroachment
Sta 180+06 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to cross
Sta 180+29 stream on its wa to existin tunnel beneath I-540.
Sta 180+29 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessary as greenway prepares to crosses
Sta 181+07 stream on its wa to existin tunnel beneath I-540
Sta 181+07 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leave Zone 1 and
Sta 181+29 buffers to tie to existin tunnel beneath I-540.
Sta 181+29 to Existing I-540
Sta 190+00 tunnel
Sta 190+00 to Zone 1 Buffer Zone 1 encroachment necessitated by the need to tie to the existing
Sta 191+70 tunnel beneath I-540 and cross stream. Boardwalk begins at Sta
190+15. Greenway occupies space beneath an electrical power
transmission line which is void of trees.
Sta 191+70 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment necessary as greenway leaves Zone 1.
Sta 191+90
Sta 191+90 to No buffer
Sta 192+02 encroachment
Sta 192+02 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail will be placed in an existing greenway easement and staying
Sta 192+59 within the cleared area of the electrical ower transmission line.
Sta 192+59 to No buffer
Sta 201+00 encroachment
Page 3 of 5

Sta 201+00 to Zone 2 Buffer Zone 2 encroachment essential as geenway prepares to cross an
Sta 201+30 existin draina a feature.
Sta 201+30 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail crosses stream using an existing access road and culvert
Sta 202+26 laced for electrical ower transmission line maintenance.
Sta 202+26 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway leaves buffers.
Sta 202+62
Sta 202+62 to No buffer
Sta 237+84 encroachment
Sta 237+84 to Zone 2 Buffer Greenway needs to cross a small drainage feature as it prepares to
Sta 238+OS cross Hone cuff Road with a edestrian crosswalk.
Sta 238+OS to Zone 1 Buffer Cross drainage feature to prepare for pedestrian crossing of
Sta 239+20 Hone cuff Road.
Sta 239+20 to Zone 2 Buffer Complete stream crossing; tie to existing pavement of Honeycutt
Sta 239+28 Road.
Sta 239+28 to No buffer
Sta 261+41 encroachment
Sta 261+41 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees. Path to be six
Sta 263+36 feet wide, natural surface.
Sta 263+36 to No buffer
Sta 263+39 encroachment
Sta 263+39 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees. Path to be six
Sta 263+89 feet wide, natural surface. Buffer encroachment needed to dampen
effects of lateral slo e.
Sta 263+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 265+28 effects of lateral slo e.
Sta 265+28 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 265+50 effects of lateral slo e. Trail headed out of buffer.
Sta 265+50 to No buffer
Sta 267+76 encroachment
Sta 267+76 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize removal of trees and dampen
Sta 268+13 effects of lateral slo e.
Sta 268+13 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 271+28 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 271+28 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 271+89 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 271+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 272+80 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 272+80 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 274+81 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 274+81 to No buffer
Sta 275+15 encroachment
Sta 275+15 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 276+15 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 276+15.65 No buffer
to Sta 276+55 encroachment
Sta 276+55 to Zone 2 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
Sta 276+80
Page 4 of 5

Sta 276+80 to Zone 1 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross stream
Sta 277+58
Sta 277+58 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 279+71 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 279+71 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 280+96 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 280+96 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 287+71 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 287+71 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 285+53 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 285+53 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 288+89 slo es as flat as ossible. Be in boardwalk Sta 288+71.33.
Sta 288+89 to Zone 1 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary to cross Honeycutt Creek.
Sta 290+03
Sta 290+03 to Zone 2 Buffer Buffer encroachment necessary as greenway completes crossing of
Sta 290+34 Hone cuff Creek.
Sta 290+34 to No buffer
Sta 292+45 encroachment
Sta 292+45 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 292+78 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 292+78 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 295+36 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 295+36 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 297+42 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 297+42 to No buffer
Sta 298+04 encroachment
Sta 298+04 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 298+40 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 298+40 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 299+37.17 slo es as flat as ossible.
Sta 299+37 to Zone 2 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 300+58 slo es as flat as ossible. Be in boardwalk Sta 300+08.35.
Sta 300+58 to Zone 1 Buffer Trail route selected to minimize tree removal and provide lateral
Sta 301+47 slo es as flat as ossible. Cross Hone cuff Creek
Sta 301+47 to Zone 2 Buffer Complete Honeycutt Creek crossing and move greenway away
Sta 302+00 from creek. End boardwalk Sta 301+49.35. Begin 2 feet wide
natural trail.
Sta 302+00 to No buffer End Trail at Raven Ridge Rd.
Sta 349+32 encroachment

Page 5 of 5

pQ, Et+•r°~ry~~ 1Jnited 5tateS I.)enartmell~t of the .I.Irlterior-
o`~ ym
vi ` o I~1SIi AND W[I,I)I..,1FIi S1_;tZVICI:;
a a
12aleiglt I~"field 0lficc
~ Yost Ofticc tiox 3372(1
M'4~c a ~~a Rttle.it~h, North Carolina 7.763(1-372(1
l~cbruary 2, 201 1
GCI'ald 1'0ttel'l1
12obert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
122 [ Corporation I'arlcway, Suite IOU
Raleigh, NC: 27610
i~~l.: iiJliC j~Guti ~Ii'(: ~:.t1 Vv'il`y'
Dear Mr. 1'ottern:
This letter i5 to inform you that a fist of all federally-protected endangered and threatened species
Willi I(nt)Wtl OCCUI'renCes 111 Nol'th ('al'Qlllla IS t10W i11~i11lilblL' 011 the 1.x.5. 1'1x11 illl(1 Wtl<11Efe
Service's (Service) web page at 1lttpa/www.fiws.gov/sleigh. '1'heri:fore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh I~'iel(1Oflice°s area o1'responsibilily (see attaclle(i county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh hield OI'1ice. for a list of federally-protected species.
Our Web page contains a conlpletc anti frc(111c11t1y updated list ofall endangered and tlu•eatened
species protected by the provisions of the Tandangcrccl Species Act of I x)73, as amende(i (I 6
U.S,(". 1531 et seq.)(~1ct), an(i it list Of {CdCi"ill SpCCICS 01C011CC:1'111 that are Known tc) occur in
each county in Nortll Carolina.
Section 7 ul'the Act requires that all federal agenCiC5 (Ol' 1he11' (ICSlgnated 1)011-fedLl'al
representative}, IIl COI1SLlltatlOn with the Service, insure that any action 1-cderally authoricd,
funclcd, or cal'I•ied otlt by such agencies is not likely to •jeopardize tllc continue(] existcllce of any
federally-liste(I endangered or threatene(i species. A biological assessment or evaluatlon may ire
1)1'Cpal'ed t0 11111111 thin 1'CClllll'C111el1t atld 111 detCl'1171n117g WhcthCl' additlOtlill CO11tiUltat1011 Wlth t17C
Service is 1lccessat•y. 1n addition to the federally-protected species list, information on tl)e
SpeCleS' l11C }11stOI'I(',S Ind habitats illld II1fU1'lllat1011 011 C01111)letEllgd b1010~:;ICaI aSSCtiSlllellt OI'
evaluation and Cal) bC 1011114 0n 0111' Web pagC at hitp://www.iws.gov/sleigh. ]'lease check the
web site often for updated 1111-ornlation or changes.
1 'I'Itc term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated utnservalictn actions. 1'ederul species of concern receive no legal protcctiun Anil their designation dons
nut necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for fisting as a federally cndanget•cd or threatened
species. l iowevcr, we recatumend that all practicable ntcasures be lateen to avoid ar minintie ach~crse impacts to
lederal species of concern.

lfya[lr project. contains suitable habitat for any oi'thc fedcrally~iisted specks known to be
present within t:he county where your project. occurs, il7e ])I'0l)OSC;Ci i1Ct1011 hi1S the pOtentlill t0
adversely iiffect those species. As such, WC I'eC0111117e11d thin' Sltl'VeyS be CondtlCt(:d lt} Cietel'I111n(:
the species' pl-ese11C(: 01' abs(:)lce Wlthlll t17e 1)I'O~eCt ill'ea. 1'17e use ol'North Carolina Nat[u'al
1-leritage p1-ogram data should not be substitut(;d for actual field surveys.
l1'yo[l detel'n7ine that the proposed action may affect (i.c., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely ai'fcct) afederally-protected species, yell S11U[Ild 11011iy thls Uffice wltll yatn'
determnrltlon, the results oi'yo[tt' surveys, survey 117ethodologies, and an analysis of the effects
oi'the action on listed species, including conslderiition of direct, indirect, and cunnllative ei7ects,
before conciuctini; a11y aCtlVltles tllilt ]lll~;ht afi'ect the sl)CCles. if y0[I detel'117111e tllilt the 1)1'o])osed
action will have no effect (i.e., Ito beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
fisted Sp[:Cll'.s, tlleil yell ill'e 1101 I'egtlll'Cd 10 COlltael Olll' OiflCe for COllell['1'el1CC (1I11lesS all
1:511 VIC017117e11tf11 1117paCt Slilt(',177e111 is 1)reparcd), How(',\'el', yell should I11a111ti1117 a C01111)lete IY;LOCd
oi'the asscssnlent, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the quallticd personnel
conducting tl7e assessn7cnt, habitat conditions, slte photographs, and any other related articles.
With re~ilyd to the above-referenced pr~jcct, WC Oilel' the f0110W111~.; 1'e111<lrkS. OUr Co111i11et11S are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, pl•ovisions of the lndangcred Species Act.
l3ilsed O11 the llli'OI'171at7017 1)I'OVlded ilnd Othel' I[1f0E'mat1U11 lVallilble, It ill)1)eill'S tllilt t11e 1)I'opase(1
action is not likely to adversely affect any Iederally-listed el7dal7gercd or threatened species, their
formally designate(1 critical habitat, or species currently proposed fol• listing under the /let at.
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7{a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your' prgjcct. ]'lease rcnncnnber that. obligiltions under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (l) slew information reveals impacts oi'this identified action that Inlay ai-feci
listed species or cl'ltlcal llill)ltilt tll<[ I11a1111C1' not previously considered; (2) thls actloll Is
subseducnily n7odified in it Il1a1711e1' tllilt Wi15 1101 ColnSldel'ed 111 t171S reV1eW; or, (3}anew species
is listed or critical habitat deternuncci that n7ay be aft-coed by tl7e icientil-fed action.
1-lowever, the Sel'vlce 1S C011ee1'rled about the potential in7pact;s the proposed action might have
on aquatic sp(;cies. Aquatic resources arc highly susceptible to sedimentation. `l'lleret<>re, we
1'eC0111111eI7Cl Chill illl 1)1'i1Cl:ICable 111eaSl.ll'e5 be til1C(',Il 10 aVOld adV(;I'SC; 11111)aetS t0 agliahC 51)(;cle5,
Illelt1C1111~; 1171plelllentlllg Cill'ectl011i11 1)0l'Ing 111CC11oC1S and stringent sediment ilnd erosli)n contl•ol
measures. nn erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to allcl al)proved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, 1.~i117d Q[lahty SCCt1011 1)1'101- t0 C011strllCtlol7.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and mau7tainecl between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we reeonllnend nlalntaining
Ililt[i-<ll, Vegetate(l 1)Ui'i-el'S 011 itll stl'eallls and creeks adjacent to the project site.
1'he North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Melnlorancium {a
copy can be found on our website at (htq)://www.fws.gov/sleigh) to address and 17n1t1].;atC
secondary and c[Inullativc impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resoul•ces and water duality.
We recommend that you col7sicier this document. in the devek)plnent of your projects and in
completing ii7 Inltlat1011 I)ilekilge i01' C011s[Iltiltlol1 (li'necessary).
2

~ ~~
r~ ~ ~Y
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemox
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
April 11, 2011
Ralph Troutman
WSP SELLS
15401 Weston Parkway
Suite 100
Cary, NC 27513
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Claudia Brown, Acting Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Honeycutt Greenway, Along Mine Creek and Honeycutt Creek, Raleigh, Wake County, ER 11-0457
Dear Mr. Troutman:
Thank you for your email of March 24, 2011, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
~ ~.
Claudia Brown
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GA wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway. Wetland GA on Mine Cr Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X Wo
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GA 1-12
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species tratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lipustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 9. Ilex onaca same FAC-
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 10. Cornus amomum shrub FACW+
4. Betula niera tree FACW 11. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
5. Ulmus americana tree FACW 12. Juncus effusus herb FACW+
6. Acer rubnun tree FAC 13.
7. Liriodendron tulinifera tree FAC 14.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 15.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 92
Remarks: GA is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest east of Mine Creek, connected to
Mine Creek by ephemeral and intermittent channels. The wetland grades upslope into non-wetland alluvial
forest„mesic mixed hardwood/pine forest, and developed land (apartments) to the east, and non-wetland levee to the
west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 12 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
X Water-Stained Leaves

Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GA is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S-8, plus infrequent over-bank flooding from Mine Creek.

SOILS
GA wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Mantachie (Mew Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvacluentic Dvstrudents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 10 YR 4/4
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/2 lOYR 5/5 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low Chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in some floodplain depressions such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is better drained, with higher Chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GA 1 to 12 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GB wetland
Project /Site: Honevcutt Greenwav, Wetland GB on Mine Cr
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GB 1-15
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species tratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW
2. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 9. Onoclea sensibilis herb FACW
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 10. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 11.
5. Lonicera japonica vine/herb FAC- 12.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine FAC 13.
7. Smilax rotundifolia vine
FAC 14.
_
8. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 90
Remarks: GB is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest east of Mine Creek, connected to
Mine Creek by intermittent channel S-8. The wetland grades upslope into non-wetland alluvial forest„mesic mixed
hardwood/pine forest, and lawn to the east, and non-wetland levee to the west.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 10 (in.) X Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 4 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GB is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from tributary
S-8, plus infrequent over-bank flooding from Mine Creek.

SOI L5
GB wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Mantachie (Me) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic D smuts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon IMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 10 YR 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 YR 4/2 common/distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in some floodplain depressions such
as wetlands GA and GB. The majority of the floodplain is better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GB i to 15 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GA + GB Upland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetlands GA, GB on Mine Cr
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes luo X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes luo X alluvial + mesic forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GA, GB
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species r tum Indicator
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica tree FACW
2. Ouercus phellos tree FACW- 9. Polvstichum acrostichoides herb FAC
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua tree FAC+ 10. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 11. Cornus florida tree FACU
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 12. Viburnum prunifolium shrub FACU
5. Lonicera japonica vine/herb FAC- 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine FAC 14.
7. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 67
Remarks: The non-wetland alluvial hardwood forest adjacent to wetlands GA and GB grades upslope into,mesic
mixed hardwood/pine forest and lawn to the east, and non-wetland levee to the west along Mine Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 18 in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Sediment deposits and drift lines on the floodplain outside of the wetland depressions appear to be
from occasional events that do not result in prolonged saturation. The watershed is urbanized and probably has
frequent but brief over-bank flooding events.

SOILS
GA + GB Upland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla (Cm) + Cecil sandy loam (CeDZ Drainage Class: somewhat poorly (Cm)
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvacluentic D shpts (CmL_ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
linchesl Horizon 1Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A l0Y 4/3
8-16 B lOYR 4/5
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators on floodplain outside of depressions GA and GB (mapped as Chewacla &
Mantachie soils), nor on adjacent slopes (mapped as Cecil sandy loam). Soil profile description above is from the
floodplain east of GB and northeast of GA.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: The areas outside of GA 1-12 and GB 1-15 are classified as non-wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GC wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GC on Mine Cr Date: 08 Oct 2009
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 08 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X luo
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GC 1-3
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species S ratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 9•
3. Liduidambar styraciflua sanl~ FAC+ 10.
4. Boehmeria cyclidrica herb FACW+ 11.
5. Lonicera japonica herb FAC- 12.
6. Acer rubrum same FAC 13.
7, 14.
g, 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 83
Remarks: GC is a linear wetland ditch 2 to 3 ft wide with sparse vegetation. It may have been a natural seep
prior to ditching and construction of a recreational area upslope to the east. GC receives flow from a corrugated
plastic pipe under this developed area. Flag GC-1 (head of wetland) is at the outlet of this pipe, and flag GC-3 (end
of wetland) is at the inlet of a short culvert beneath the sewer maintenance access road alongf the east bank of Mine
Creek..
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in•) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 4 (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
X Water-Stained Leaves

_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland GC was saturated at or near the surface during dry weather conditions, and apparently receives
constant flow from a drainage pipe under the swimming pool and recreational area to the east. It drains into Mine
Creek via a culvert under the sewer maintenance road.

SOILS
GC wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla soils (Cm) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/1
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Mucky mineral texture and low Chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adjacent
floodplain is better drained, with higher Chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The ditch segment delineated by wetland flags GC 1 to 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Adjacent UPLAND vegetation, hydrology and soils indicators are the same as for GA and GB.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
GF wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GF on Honeycutt Cr
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 14 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Hillside seep forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GF 1-3
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species S ratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecles Stratum Indicator
1. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC
2. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+ 9.
3. Liguidambar styraciflua sanlu FAC+ 10.
4. Lindera benzoin shrub FACW 11.
5. Lonicera japonica herb FAC- 12.
6. Acer rubrum sap1Q FAC 13.
7. 14.
g, 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 83
Remarks: Wetland GF is a ditched hillside seep 3 ft wide with sparse vegetation that flows into a headwater
tributary of Honeycutt Creek above Bent Tree Pond. It is bordered by mesic hardwood forest on the slopes and a
narrow band of alluvial forest along the creek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 8 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
X Water-Stained Leaves

_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GF is apparently maintained by seepage from the adjacent upland to the west. The upper
half of this seep appears to be higher than the flood elevation of the creek below. It was saturated at the surface
during dry weather in October.

SOILS
GF wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes soils (WwF) Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inched Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/1
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This seep is an unmapped hydric inclusion on a slope mapped as Wilkes and Cecil soils. Mucky
mineral texture and low chroma indicate hydric soil in linear wetland GC. The adjacent slopes and narrow
floodplain are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The linear seep marked by wetland flags GF 1 to 3 is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set
forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GH wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GH on Honeycutt Cr Date: 19 Oct 2009
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 19 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GH 1-10
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vaccinium corymbosum shrub FACW 9. Osmunda regalis herb OBL
2. Ilex verticillata shrub FACW 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Microstegium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Betula nigra tree FACW 12.
5. Woodwardia areolata herb OBL 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FAC 15.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 100
Remarks: GH is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest, east of a headwater tributary of
Honeycutt Creek, and connected to that stream by an ephemeral channel. The wetland grades upslope into non-
wetland alluvial forest„and mesic mixed hardwood forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4 - 12 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
X Water-Stained Leaves

_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GH is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands. It does not appear to
receive overbank flow from the creek to the west.

SOILS GH wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee & Bibb (Wow Drainage Class: poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
linchesl Horizon IMunsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1 lOYR 5/4 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this floodplain depression.
Adjacent portions of the floodplain toward the creek are better drained, with higher chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GH 1 to 10 is classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
» Wetland GP 1-7, located 400 feet east of wetland GH =small depression, vegetation and soil
indicators similar to GH.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GQ wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GO on Honeycutt Cr Date: 29 Jun 2010
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 29 Jun 2010
Investigator: Gerald Pottem. Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes tvo X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GQ 1.1g
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species tr m Indicator
1. Salix nigra shrub FACW+ 9. Ludwigia palustris herb OBL
2. Baccharis halimifolia shrub FAC 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Juncus effusus herb FACW+
4. Pinus taeda tree FAC 12.
5. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+ 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Rubus argutus shrub FACU+ 15.
8. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 91
Remarks: GQ is a scrubby marsh wetland beneath a powerline, periodically mowed or sprayed to exclude trees.
It is adjacent to an intermittent or barely perennial stream, and was probably alluvial forest prior to clearing for the
powerline right-of--way. It grades upslope into upland scrub and dry-mesic hardwood/pine forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks)
T Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0 - 1 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 - 8 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
x Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GQ is maintained by the creek flowing through it and lateral seepage from adjacent
upland slopes. It was saturated throughout and inundated in several areas during dry weather.

SOILS
GQ wetland
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee & Bibb (Wo) Drainage Class: poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inchesl Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 4/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 5/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low Chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this alluvial wetland. Adjacent
uplands are mapped as Cecil sandy loam.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area enclosed by wetland boundary flags GQ 1 to 18 is classified as a wetland (excluding the 2 to 5
foot wide stream channel within the wetland) based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) GM wetland
Project /Site: Honeycutt Greenway, Wetland GM on Honeycutt Cr Date: 26 Oct 2009
Applicant /Owner: Raleigh Parks & Recreation Date: 26 Oct 2009
Investigator: Gerald Pottem, Robert .J. Goldstein & Assoc. County: Wake
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Community ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X alluvial forest
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: GM 1-25
and GM 100-107
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ouercus alba tree FACU 9. Pilea numila herb FACW
2. Ilex onaca shrub FAC- 10. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Microstesium vimineum herb FAC+
4. Fagus srandifolia tree FACU 12. Viburnum nudum shrub FACW+
5. Lindera benzoin shrub FACW 13.
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 15.
8. Smilax glauca vine _FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- 67
Remarks: GM is a thinly forested depression within alluvial hardwood forest, at the confluence of three
drainageways (one ephemeral, two intermittent) flowing northwest into Honeycutt Creek. The wetland grades
upslope into non-wetland alluvial forest and mesic mixed hardwood forest. The mix of mat ure "upland" trees and
"wetland" shrubs and herbs suggest that this wetland may be relatively young, possibly due to Falls Lake Dam.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
x Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4 - 16 (in.) x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 9 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology in GM is apparently maintained by seepage from adjacent uplands and flow from three
small tributaries. It may also receive backwaters from Falls Lake after large storms.

SOILS
GM wetland
Map Unit Name
Series and Phase): Chewacla soils (,Cm) Drainage Class: somewhat poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dvstrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No x
Profile Descrlotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 2.5 Y 3/2
8-16 B 2.5 Y 4/1 lOYR 5/4 common/ distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low Chroma and redox concentrations indicate hydric soil patches in this floodplain depression.
Adjacent portions of the floodplain are better drained, with higher Chroma, and not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: The area between wetland boundary flags GM 1 to 25 and GM 100 to 107 is classified as a wetland
based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The wetland
continues northwest of GM-25 and GM-100, which is not a delineated wetland boundary
» Wetland GN, located 2100 feet southwest of GM, has vegeattaion, hydrology and soil indicators similar
to GM.

North Carolina ©ivision of Water Quality -Stream Identi#ication Form; Version 3.1 S- ~
Date: $~ DCT ZD09 Protect: ~Uh~yCU~'~' ~sYeehw~ Latitude: 35'. $"J~16
Evaluator: C~.et-a(c~ 'pb-~tet-vt site: Lonysfi-cep Drive t-angtt~,de: 78, 6y5 ~^~
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ~, ~j County: ~l~~e. Other QAIQ~_r ',l~.{
if a 19 or erennial if Z 30 • rv a.g. Quad Name: (~ 1 1,yf1, N/

_A. Geomorpholo~y~subtoial =_TL'~~~ Ab ent Weak
~ Moderate - ';.Strpng'
1°. Continuous bed and bank
-- 0
-
~~mm~•~ 1
- 2 ~ ~ 3
2. Sinuosity ___ _
__ _
~ _. 0 1 2 - -- 3

3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Solt texture or stream_substrate sorting
__ _~~~~~-~~~
0
0 _

1 ___
2
2 _
3 ____
3
5. Active/relic fioadplain •. _ 1 _._ 2 __~3 __
6. Depositional bars or benches
---------^^
-~
--- 1 2 3
7. Braided channel
__._...._.._..__...._.--_--__..__._._.._._.....__ 0 i 2 -_-- --_ 3 -

8. Recent alluvial deposi#s
9° Natural levees ._._
0
0 ._~.._._.__ _
1 ._.____._
2
2 .__ _y______
3
3
10. Maadcuts
__...__..._.__.-___ ~T....__.------.-----Y._ __.._._ _. __
11. Grade controls 0
..--- -....__
0 1
_ ._..-. --
0.5 2
-------_...~_...
1 3
.~._......___..___.._
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exiStlnq
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
Yes ~ 3
noon-moos ancnos are not rates; see discussions in manual
B. Hydralo
_O:~:S ~}
gy Subtotal =
~
_
_
,~_~__
.
.
.
14, Groundwater flow/discharge ,.,__.__
---~-~--
1

2 _

3
15, Water in channel and ~ 48 lirs since rain, ,o,~ /~1 1 2

Water in channel --dry or growin~g.season _
~_ ~;J 3
16. Loaflitter 1,5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris
. 0,5 1 1.5
~_...-__.._.._....._._.__.__.__-.------__.__._ ..__~-_
18.Organic debris linos or piles {Wrack lines) _..~. _.
0 _.._ .___. _
.5
1 __..._._.4_...____.-
1,5
19_Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _
No ~ Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~~~ 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
_ ._..- -- ...._..T_.__-__ __...._...-...___._....__._.......__ ....................__..._.._._
21 .Rooted plants in channe! ......__ ---......______... _......
8 ....._...__.._~._-------._v_
2 ._.........._... _. ---....._......__
1 _......_----
0
22._Crayfish -----•-------__._._.------
0.5
1
1,5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
_25.-Amphibians _._._ .............____.................__......._...__......._._.__.._.._____-. _..._.._ 0.5 T 1.5
26. Maerobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton M_-__ 0 1 2 3

28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus,
_~~.__.-.
~
- _ _
____
- 0,5 _
i - _
_
~ 1,5
29
~
Wetland plants in streambed
- -- _
_ __
FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
..~~~~~ ~,. a~ ~„ ~ ~ IVIrUA VII U IU N~ vocnu; ~~ uNianu p~anis, nem cy rucuses on ine presence of aquauc or weaana plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
__ ~PN~ shown- o» soj rMa ~~~ ft
s
~ ~~s~
.~m~t

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ,~'-~
Date: $ ~~~" 209 Protect: ~phPyCU~ CT~C~PYtWgy Latitude: ~'~, $''~Fj9
Evaluator: GPI-a~c~ ~o~~l"~I site: ju(jy~p Cr ~ ,forks Longitude: 7g, 6~f,57
Total Paints: n L other /T~
Stream is at feast intermittent ~a County: ~~ n ~ e. g. Quad Name: kJ a~teaf
if z i9 or erennial if a 30
A. Geom_or~holog~Ssubtotal =__ ~ a _~~____ Absent Weak Moderake
~ ' ':.Str ng ;
1°. Continuous_ bed and bank
- 0 1 - 2 3
2. Sinuosity __
-~ 0 _
~ _
1 ~ _ _
~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0 _
1
1 _
2
2 3
3
5. Activelrelic Floodplain_ _ _ _ 0 ____ 1
_ 2 _ ~-
~
- _ _ 3
~~
6. Depositional bars or benches-~ -_ _
- 0 1 2 ~
7. Braided channel
__ _ 0
_.~ _. 1 2 _
3
8, Recent alluvia! deposits
9° Natural Eevees 0
0 1
i 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts _ __ --.--.- ----- 0 „-
~ __
1 _.
___._ _._.W 2 _ 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 _
12. Natura! valley or drainagoway 0 0.5 1 .5
13. Second or greater order channel on exlstina
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes ~3
man-macro oncnes are not raloU; soo aF5CU55lons In manual
R Wvrlrnlnnv fSiFhtntal = 9 ~ 1
14. Groundwater flowldischarge _-
_._.-_~___..-.~_..__.._.__._.._ .-.--- 0
..-.____.w.._..._~.. 1
---__. 2
----...____ 3
.._.-.- ._.._.~_.
15. Water in charmel and ~ 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or_growing season___ ____ 0 i
~_ _ ___
~ 2
_ _ _ O
16. Leaflitter - -- _ 1.5
1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0,5 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack fines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = -_._~3 ~~)
20 .Fibrous reels in channel
2111, Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish 3
3
0 2 1 0
2 1 0
0.5 1 1.5
29. Bivalves 0
_._
1
2 3
24, Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous aigae~periphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1
5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0. FA .
CW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
iFems zu ana n Focus on Fne presence or upland plants, Isom 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. ~
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
PEiRE1U~ ~~tDWYi di+l "~0~0 -~` 5pl~S
_ _._. Mine Cr 6Ves~l'af ,~jx F+~s Rd .._.__
lA
X
~_Z NeftrFa>,

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S~ ~
Date: Q` p~-r Z,t~pq Project: N0~leycu~'>'' isi'eeMway Latitude: 3 5-, g~ g7
Evaluator: Gr~i-alc~ ~01`~tYw site: M(jrge Cr ~ j~Qta¢uN ~d Longitude: '~ ~'• (~ y3o
Total Points: ~~/ Other j~
Stream is of least intermittent Y~• ~ County: Vl! a k~ e. g. Quad Name: tray l ea f
ifz l9 or erenniall/z 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__.~5=~_
- Absent ;:
Y ~ ;Weak Moderate` Strong - ':
Continuous bad and bank_ _
1°.
- 0 ____ 1 ___ 2 3
__
2. Sinuosity __
- 0 _ 1 ___ ____
2 3

3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1
~ 2 _
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
_'.______-_____ 0
_. 1
_- 2 3
5, Active/relic floodpfain 0 1 __ 2 - _V
3

6.YDepositional bars or benches
0
1
2 _
_
~3
7. Braided channel 1 2 _
3

8. Recent alluvial deposits__ -
-___.._ ___.._ ~ -----._._.__ _~_._.
9° Natural levees
0
..__..._...__..._.~.__..--
0
1
_-_-- _...._.. .
1 _ _
2
.. -- _ _
2 __.
3
_ T._
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3

11. Grade controls
0
0,5
1 .__.-.
1.

12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0.5
1 _._
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes
-Man-made tlftches are not ratetl; sea tlhsc-usslons in manual
R Hvrirnlanv lSuhtntal = ~• a 1
14. Groundwater flow(disch
arge 0 1 2 3
_
___
15. Water in channel and > 48 firs since rain, or _
_
0 ___
_ _
1 ___. _
___ __
2 _ _
3
~_ Water in channel_-~ or growing season ~___

16. i.eaflitter __

1.5
_. _w.__.._--- --
1
-----_..
0.5
._. ._

0
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris _ - -_ ~_
_. ____...._..__.__.__ 0 0,5
____ 1.5

18. Organic debris fines or piles (Wrack lines) .,_____.._..
0 0.5 ..___-._ ._.__.._.....W....~...~
1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No Yes = 1.5
C. l3ioloav (Subtotal = ~ t )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
----
23. Bivalves - -
0 .___
1 ~.~ _..~ .._.._._._M._._._
3
24. Fish
._...~____~......_......_._..._....._._._._.._._.._...___.__ ____.___..__... 0
.y.....w.._
.- 4.5 1 1.5

25. Am hibians
--_.__ p.__.._.-.._....._.....__...._.._..._.__._...__.._....___.._._..---____-- __
-------
0
---.___..~_._.._....- ----
0.
--..._-- ----_......... -- ----.....
1
_..._.___ ...._......_ _----° -
1.5
__~.

26. Macrobenihos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
~ .---....._....___.._.
1.5
_ _ _
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ _ ~
_ _ _ _ 1 _
~ _
_ 2 _3
~
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. __ 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Hems zu ano z~ rotas on the presence of upland plants, nom zs tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Rkafrh•
Notes: (use back side of this form tar additlonai notes.)
..____.J~e_~ sHou1~ o~ Apo ~- S o~' s
_ ~ ri»ei Car h er~/l a11f' ~1p~~x 1 p~(• ~ .__----
5-3
New~coh

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1 $' y
Date: ~' QLT 2009 Protect: f~onPyCU~'I' Cs--ePNWa Latitude: 3 Cam', ggQ 7
Evaluator. G~~-d~~ ~0'fi'~f't'Vl Site: ~/~~pn ~a /~p~5 Longitude: 78. 6L~Z!
Total Points:
Stream is at least intenniftent ~ County: ~,} / Other ~~~ ~~~
if ~ f9 or erennla! If z 30 -'v ~ ~~ e.g. L?uad Name:
A. Geomorphology _ {Subtotal -__~~_ ~~ Absent_ '::.Weak Moderate: Strong ,
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate_so_rti_ng __
^ _ 0 1 2 3

5. Active/relic floodplain
_____
0
1 ___ __
_
`
2 _
-
3 ~

fi. Depositional bars or benches
---------_-__.~ _
0 -- _
1
-- __
_
-2 _
__
___
3
7. Braided channel 0 - ~__.-_ /. ~ 2 - - --"--- 3 ._.
8. Recent alluvial de osits
_---- _..._... p _._..._._....--.__._-._..____
_
. 0 1 2 3
..
_.
_.__.___..__
9 ° Natural levees --_-- -._......
0 _----_-__.. ._.__--___.
f ._ __._____..-.-------...
2 ._...._......______..._._.._.-
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11, Grade controls
--_._..___.wW........_.----------._......._..._
_. 0.5 1 1.5

12. Natural valley or_drainageway _
- __
0 _.__ ...-. -
0.5 -~-____._..__-
1 -----___-
1.5
13. Second or greater order channe! on exislina __
_ _
-~ - "-~ -^- '----LL--~`
USGS or MRCS map or other documented No ~ Yes = 3
evidence.
man-macro anc:nes are not ra~oD; scae Discussions m manua~
R Hvrirnlnnv lfiuhtnfal. a~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in cl3annei and > A8 hrs since rain, or /'~'1 1 2

- _ Water in channeEmmdry or~rowing_season ___ _
- .__.__~-
_- v 3

16. Leaflitter
1.5 __
~ 0.5-
0
_ 17. Sediment on plants or debris _ _ 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines} 0 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No 0 Yes -- 1.5
C. Bioloav fSuhtntal = ~ 1
--~ -------___.-__.._. ~__s___.__----.
20 . Fibrous roots m channel

_... .
b.__.____..._____.__._~-_.._..._......_..._ _ - ---.---_.___.._..___..._-..
" -_. ~..._._.--
3

...,...,._._.._.._....__...____ ----_....___~
2

.._.._..._...__._...._ ................ ...-.. .._

_.
1
_..._._._..~ ___._._. __

_ _
~_ 0
__..._..-,..-... _....
---..
21 . Rooted plants in channel t~t
C1
----_ __.__.....-.._.._.._ .._._---~ --P . 3
__-..._. .~ 2 1 0

22. Crayfish .--
0 --._...-...
0.5 ~-----_____.._...-
1 -.._..._
1.5 --
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish
_~, _..-.- ..__...---._._.-_
_ 0 -
-
0-5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians -
- -__.....
0,5 ._..,
..~___
1 __---
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ____ 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ~ - - ~ 0.5 - 1 ~~1.5
2g .Wetland plants in streambed
B :----~-- - - _
_
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0;-Other
~~c:nia <~ anu ~ , wcu~ vn ina p~esaiwc o~ upiana p~anrs, nom zy rocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
_ ~~~M~~~11 ShuWh oh Soil ~a
trr -ra ditch urban -s~t~a~r
N~~""
~ ~' y
.~~' S"~ Apts
~e~~~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~-~+6
Date: $ OCT 24p`J Project: f~o>7Pycu~l- ~sreerrwa Latttuae: ,3 g. S8 ~ 5"
Evaluator: ~t?I-Q~q ~PO~ttl`Vi Slte: ~~yJ~p~~Q~~~ fS Longitude: g. ~[~~)
Total Paints: other Q ~q~,~
Stream is atleasf intermittent /.~ ~ County: ~~ ~e. e.g. Quad Name: faay ~"~ ~
if z l9 or erennial if ~ 30

_A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =~G_5_' ?~-
_ 1°. Continuous bed and bank ~ Abs_en_ t :
0 ~ 'Weak
- 1- _" M_ oderate '
~ 2 _ :;Strong
- 3
2. Sinuosity __ 0 _
1 _
~ ~~~
-~ 3

3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1 _
__
2 _
3

4. Soil texture or slream su
b
strat
e sorting
0
1
2 _
3
_
_
_
5. Activelrelic floodplain Y ______ _ 0 ___ _ _ _
____
1 __ ___ 2 3 _
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
___
7. Braided channel ____ ____. J
µ ....~._.__........_._.....-. -------
0
- .
1
2- ____
_
3

8. Recent alluvial deposits .._._._..--.--___.__._..._.-._.._...._...--_.-.-
98 Natural levees .____
---._-_._ a __.__._._
0 ._._ ._
._..._.__ 1 ----
~
2 ---
3
3
10. Hoadculs 0 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway-- 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5 __
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin4
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yos
_ Man-maao ulFCnes are not ratotl; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolnav (Subtotal = ~'~ 1
14. Groundwaterflowldischarge______~ a 1 2 3
--_~
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In channel -- dr
or
rowi --T..~
_.._..__
0 __4
__,____._
1 1...._ ~~
„~.
2 __
,•", ^~_.-_
U
___ _
y
g
ng season _~_ ~__._....
_ .. _
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ___ _ 0 0 1
1,5
_ 18. Organic debris lines or pries (Wrack lines) _
__
0 0.5 _
1
1.5

19. H dric sods redoximor hic features resent?
No 0 _
_
Yes - 1.5 _`_
C- Binlonv fSuhtnta! _ ).~ 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel _ ~ ~
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 _.. - 0
0
22. Crayfish _
.-._______---- 0
-._...
__..._.-. 0.5
-
--- 1
___._ 1.5
__._..._
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Ma_Crobonthos (note diversity and abundanco)___ 0
__ 0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 _ ___
2 _
._.__ - 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria!(ungu
s. 0 0.5 1 1.5
_
_
__ ______ _ __
29 Wetland plants In streambed ~~ FAC 0, FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
~~C~ns ,cv anu c ~ ~~ws un uie presence or up3ana prams, nom zy rocuses on me presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of th{s form for additional notes.) Sketch:
_ e ~wr~ r~~owv~ ovr o + soy/ __--____ s, 6 tat-/~oN9
- -__ ____ ^.._. _ 3S. SS 20
__.__... ! U • ~ ~ bV
5~6
i
i
i
S- S `
5^5
~~

hiortFt Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Farm; Version 3.1 S-~f'
Date: g pt;~ ~()~ Project: NONP~/C{l~ tSf~PI1W~t Latitude: 3„5. ~~a0
Evaluator: G~~-~~d ~p~tQry) Sito: ~~ (~Q A~j'~'~' Longitude• '~~, ~j~ j~
Total Points: other
Stream is at feast fnterrnittent rO County: ~~ ~~ gay/e~I f
if 2 19 or erennlal if 2 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology r~5ubtotal =__ `~~_
1°. Continuous bed and bank ___
~ ' 'Absent: '
_ 0 ~ ` ' ,Weak
1 ~ Moderate:~~
~
~ Strong
~~ 3
_2. Sinuosity
_
____. 0
- 1 -
2 3

3. In-channel structure: rifne-pool sequonce
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
~ ~__...
~~
~
0
0
~
1
1
2
2 ___
__
3 _
9
5. Active/relic #loodplain
_
_ 0 1 __
_
2 3

_ 6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 __
2 _
____
~ 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recant alluvial doposits
------ - --__-------......---..._..
9 a Natural levees 0
----- ---.._.._._...
0 1
...__..__ -~-----_
1 2
_---__._________
2 3
_.._ ___.w
3
10. tloadcuts 0 1 2 3
11, Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
-- ___ _ ___ __
12, Natural valley or drainageway~^_~ -_
~
T ___
~_
0
..._ .._~~_
__..
5 -1

~--~---~-~---- ____
1.5~~
13. Second or greater order channel
on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~ ~____
Yes = 3
Man-msdo ditchos are not rated; soo discussions in manual
B. Hvrlrnlnnv (Suhtntal = 2• ~ S
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1 2 3
15. Wafer in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2

-Water in channel~or~c rrowing season` 3

16. Leaflitter
1.5 -
1 _
0.5 --__ __ -
0
17. Sediment on plants or dobris
.__...._~.___...._~____. _____U__.._.....____._...._ 0 0.5
~_._..__ -.____.._-._.___ 1 1.5

rgantc ens tnes or pt es rack Itnos)

0
0.5 ..._...~ .__. _..._____~..~_._--
1 1 5
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ ~~_~------ _

..
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?--N__
__._.
_
_ _
. ______„-.^ - ~~_-~ - - - ~ ~
No 0 - - - -
Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___v~_ _____ }

20 .Fibrous roots in channel

21 . Rooted plants in channel

3

3

2

2 _ ~
_
1

1 _
_._.-
p
..... ..
0
22. Crayfish
23. Bivalves 0
0 0.5
1 1
2 1.5
3
24. Fish __ ^TT 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macr_obe_nthos (note diversity and abundance) _ 0

` 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
_ 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton -.~~-M-.~~___ ---
_ 0 - 1--_._ __.~__ 2 ._. 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
__ _ __ _____
29s Wetland plants in streambed _ _ ~ _
FAG = 0.5;- FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
trams 1U and z~ locus on the presenco of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Sketch:
Ndtos: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) !
str~ Hued c~iat~~e! a t east ed~ of _ ~ , l
__.
~a ~
EPIfEMF,I~~~. ~ Mnt wta~perrl oh sar! oirfopo. C
1 ~- ----
~,

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~" g
Date: $' Of T Z0O I Project: ~On~yCUlff ~TrPPllWaiJ Latitude: ~, j . 8'$ ~'
Evaluator: Get-~j~ ~o~,~ervl Site: ~Q~ ~n~~~jj~ ~n Longitude: /~'~^. (yl~ly
Total Points: Other
Stream fs at least intermittent ~~~ ~" County: ~~ ~~ e.g. Quad /Name: ~a,~)' ~~~
tf z J9 or erenntat !f z 30
AA. G~hology_~btotal=_~~~_ ~_~ Absent. " :Weak
~ Moderate "Strang,:
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
_
--- -------------- _ 0
0
1 2
2 3
3
.
._._
5. Active/relic floodplain - Y...
0 _
1
2 .._-----
3
6. Depositional bars or benches __ T. M ~.~_ 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel _
~ ~ ___. 0 ~
1 -_._.
2 3

8. Recent alluvial deposits
9" Natural levoes _
0
0 _
_
.~.. 1
1
~~
__..
2 __
_
3
3
10, Headcuts 0 __
~~~ ___
_
2' ~- _
3
11. Grade controls
--.~__...__.._.___....._._.._._.__._---.__-. 0
-- 0.5
- 1 1.5

12, Natural valley or drainageway
0 - _____._.
.5 .._^.____._w~
1 _.___•---_._...-..-_..
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi- sting
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidonce.
No ~0
Yes = 3
Doan-mace altCnes are not ralea; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 1
14. Groundwaterftow/dischargQ _ __ __ 0 ~
~__
~' 1 2 3
15. Watar in channel and > 48 his since rain, or
W
t
i
h
l
d _
~
0 _ ___
_ _ 1 - ____
_
Q ^` _
3
er
anne
_
a
n c
.-~
r~or growing, soason _ ~
..._._..~_~.___._.__.-......._ -. W _ ..... ___
-.. .

1G. t_eaflittor
.____~_____._...__._._-.~__.......-.._. _.w.....___....__-._--
_
1.5
.-..---.---...._..._____.- 4
....._ ~._ ~

..--

0.5
-----_..___._.._._
0

17. Sediment on plants or debris
0 -.
0.5 _.__....-.-.-_---~.
1 .~.~_
1.5
18.Organic debris Imes or piles (Wrack lines)
_.._.__._.._---_.----..~._.r_--.----.._....-.._...._-__..._._._.__....._.__-_....._......_ 0 0.5
..._...---._ __--
_ 1 i.5

19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? . _
_...._. ___.....---..__-_-.-------
No = 0 -______...._ __-..-_.___.-..
`_ .Yes 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = fD • ~ 1
20 . Fibrous roots m channel
21 . Rooted loots in channel 3
3 2
2 i
1 0
0
22. Crayfish __ _~..-_.^~.~W
--- -- .-------w
23. Bivalves 0
.__._.... __
0 _
0.5
- -
1 1 -----
- _.w.. . ~
2 1.5
._ ,.
3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25_Amphibians
__----_ .............__.T___~____... _ ~_.- 0
...__.___~_._....._..._..... 0.5
--.__- 1 1.5

26. Macrobenthos (nose divorslty and abundanco)__
0 -__ _....~__._
0. _~_._____.. _._
1 ._...-___.....__~...._...._..--
1.5
_27, Filamentous algae; periphyton ____ 0 1 -~-~~V-- - ~~"~' 2 ---- 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 ~ _
1 ~ 1
5
__ __ ____
29 Wetland plants in streambed~ --- ~ _
_ _
.
FAC 0.5• FACW = W0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
..~~.~~ ~~ a~ ~.+ ~ ~ ~wu~ ~„ ,,,~ N,n~„~~ of up,ano pants, nc~m ca wcuses on me presence of aquaue or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes,)
_~d~-~rff ~c~tT e11d__s_~2_l~efl.~r~aC_~~
.c~1~e~~ar~~.ra
runoff=!~~~1ah~tx G.~.-~_~~..~~e~
_ showvt o~ ~~.il_-~ .
GA
~\\
N
W ~T ~
;G13;
s-8

*`'u/ ~
~er~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification a:orm; Version 3.1 ~- 9
Date: ~ vet 2009
Evaluator: Get-alc~ 'po~err~i
i'otal Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ~~ ` 5
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30
Project: ~Oh(~/CUft ~SYeP~rWu
Site: ~ 0~ perttly Nt({ ~QO1
County: YV a ~~~
Latitude: ~~. gg' 3
Longitude: 'rg , 6 ~ ~ 3
other 13ay~e~-F
e.g. Quad Nama:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____ ~ J __ __'_Absent T .:';Weak` ~ Moderate `. ;Strong
1". Continuous bed and bank
_--_ ~ 0
- 1 V 2 ~~ 3
2. Sinuosity p --- ~ -- -- 2 3 _.
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
-^ 0
-- 1 2 3

5. Active/relic floodplain _ _
_
_ 0 __
_ __
~ 1 _
~ 2 ____
- 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 _ __ _
2 _ 3--
7, Braided channel
_.._... ~-
..-
.
. 0 1 2 3
-
_
.__
__....._....._--
8. Rocent alluvia! deposits
9° Natural levees _ _
_
._-------
__ ~ ---- ..~...

0
-- _._ __
1
1 .__..._
2
2 -_J.
3
3
`
10. Meadcuts
...__~
----- 0 --- ___. 1 ._-_ 2 --- ~__-
_ 11. Grade controls ~_-`_.-_-_-----
_~ __. _
_. -
0
..V. ,5 1 1,5

12. Natural valley or drainagoway ^-
-
0 .._
-~- -
0.5
1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No ~
Y
=

evidence. es
3
iwmrmnua uuuies are not raieo; seenuiscussions mmanua~
R Hvrirnl~nv fSiihfnfal = 2~5 \
14, Groundwater fEo_w/discharge - ---~^_--~~-~--
-~ ---- 0 1 2 3 --
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _ _
-- _--
--_ ~_
- _.._2__.-~` --
Water inchannel --dry or growing season 0 1 3
_
16. Leaflitter
__...._-_.----_._..__......_ .v... _. ____._.._.-__....
1.5
_-- ...._.._._
1
O.v 0

17. Sediment on plants or debds .
0 .__-- .__
0.5 __._.._ __....__..-_ -__--
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
19. Mydric soils {redoximorphic features) presont7 No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biology {Subtotal = ___~_-____}
20 . Fibrous roots in channel

21 . Rooted plants in channel .___
22. Crayfish 3 2 _ __ __

3 2
0 0.5 _ 1
. ...
1
1 0
_
0
1,5 --
23. Bivalves __ -~_.. + ` 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance} __ 0 0.5
-- 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0 --__ 1 _---
.-___.W --
2 --~-- 3Y~
28. Iron oxidi2ing b_actoria/fungus.
---._-.
-- 0 ~ 0.5 _
_
- 1 _
~ 1.5
_
_
6
29 . Wetland plants in streambed - - _-~ _
FAC 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1,5 SAV = 2
.0; Other = 0
icoms cu ana ~~ rocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Skolch:
~phevr-erz~~._.~oins~w~t a/'~h Gc~ W
~tv - _ --
~0 mans ___ _
GG
r
.1111 wt' /ups/ J~
"" 9
one c eek .~ S-
M

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S" ~~
__ _ _ - ---
Date: 9 SGT aDa 9 Protect: Npn~ycutf (sf ePhWat~ Latitude: 35 , $ 8 63
Evaluator: Gerald ~'o~t~rvt site: Sul o~ ofd ~r Trl. Longitude: fig, ~, ~g 8
Total Points: r,, Other /
stream is at least intermittent ~ ~ , ~ County: YV ~ k~ $Qy/PQ ~'
rf z ?9 or erenniat !f z 30 e.r~. Quad !Jame: /
_A. Geomorphology Subtotal =___(Q_ _ ~L_ Absent. __ _' ' .Weak ~~ Moderate Strong ~.
1°. Continuous bed and bank
~~_ 0
----- 1 2 __ 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 - 3 ---
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0

0 1

1 2

2 3
_..-
3
5. Active(relic tloodplain 0 1 2 3
6. l7epositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits

9" Natural levees
_._._..._.-._._._._~..--...M..._......-...-_... _.._.__-- 0

0
__----- -__
_- _ 1
.---
1 2

2 3

3

10. Hoadcuts ~. ~____._._-
11. Grade controls .
J 4_ 0 .,_ _-
0 ._ _-_._
-_- 1 _ __._--
2
i -_.._._ _...___ _.__
3
1,5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0. 1 1,5
13. Second or greater ordor channel on xistin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. _
~ ~ ~.
No ~ _ _ ____
_
- ~ - - ~-~-
Yes = 3
iman-mane ancnes are nor rarea; saa aiscussions m manual
B- Hvdroloov (Stthtntal = o[ 1
14. Groundwater flowldischarge 0 1 2 3
15, Wator in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
W
t
I
h /;,'`1
'/
l` 1 2 3
a
or
n c
annel- dr r~nrgrowing season_ _
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0

17. SedimenE on plants or debris
1 B
O
i
d
b
i
li
0
0.5 . .
1 _ __
1,5
_-
rgan
c
e
r
s
nos or piles (Wrack lines) 0,5 _ _ _ 1~ 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3 •/~ 1
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 - p -'-
21 ,Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 p
22. Cra fish
___._._._..__ y.__..._...-..__._..._...._-...___.~._.~. 0 0.5 1 1,5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians _ 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria(fungus, 0 0.5 1 1
5
29_Wetland plants In streambed ~~ .
FAC _ 0. FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Hems ~u ana ,c ~ rocus on me presence of upiano plants, Item z9 tocusos on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch: }
Notos: (use back side of this form for additional notos.) /
--_------ ~ ~, ~ ~- fp
~~
t~ ~
k

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3.9 s- ~
--
Date: ~' ()Gt ~~ 9 Pro)ect: ~(on~CU~f C5 Y~eNWQ Latitude: ~S'", 8'870
Evaluator: GOB-q~~ ~D~t{ ryi site: S(~ d f' a(d ~- '~rA,r~ Longitude:
7g.b38$
7otai Points: gther
Stream is et least intermittent County: ~~,{,~/ Q,.'PQ~
lf21s or erennial if z 30 (O VV ~ ~ e.g. Quad Name: PW
A. Geomor~holo Subtotal = __ 6_ __ ~_~ Absent . ; -Weak ~ Moderate : `:: Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank
~~__ _ 0
- 1 2 3
2, Sinuosity
__ ~__
._.._- -~ . ~ 1
____w_. _
2 M
~ 3

3. in-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1
2 -_~
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0
~- 1 2 3
5. Active/relic (loodplain ~_______ __ -
0
__~.. _
_
1 ___
2 ~-~ --v
- 3
"~
6. Depositional bars or benches
...~___ _........__. ___-___._..____ ------ _ 0
-_ __
____ 1 _
~2 __
_
~ 3

7. Braided channel 0 ----.- 1.. _ 2._........._._ _. 3 _.
d deposlis ~___.._-----------...,._.
,......_...
- ---_---.- S
L
--
9
° Natural levee 0 _- _. _.
.
____. .._.__.......-._. ~..._..._.-._ _.__.._3...._._........
10. Headcuts p 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0. 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 a.5 1 1.5
_ __
13. Second or greater order channel on existi~- __
~ ~~-_ _____
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No ~0 Yes = 3
evidence.
~.,,,,,-,,,uuu „~,~,,.,~ a,~ „v. ia~ou, eon uiacuaawiw ni mauuai
B. Hvdroloav lSt3htntal = ~ 1
14. Groundwatertiaw/discharge ~_~
__.._.-_---.______..__-... .._. 0
__....._ __ 1
__......._..._
_ 2 3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Wafer inchannel -- dy or growing season
.
0 _
_.____.
O ...__m---.--..-.-_-._
2 .._. w..
3
-
___
18. Leaflitter
_.~__.._._.__.._..______---.-.----W_
_ _ ____ ~ _- ~- ~~_
1,5 1 ~, Y-
0.5 0 _
~
_~-
~
~__.__._...._
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18
O _..._.._._ ^__..._.._.._. ___.._.... `.
0 0.5 _..._..,
`___
_..
--_.._... _._
1 1,5
.
rganic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0,5 1 1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? __
-_^ _ Na ~ _. Yes = 1.5 ~ _
C. 6iologY (subtotal = _.-- °~ ----)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 --'~~~-~ 1 ~ --- ~
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish--------_.__..-~.....M_-._.._.___.------_ ....----- 0,5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5

25. Amphibians
.___.__..........__.__..----------.--._...___ _.._
0
___...___--_ _-...
_--
0.5
1 _
1.5
26. Macrobonthos n
.__ ~ (ote diversity and abundaneo) ..
0 -._.__ _._.__.._....._...._.
0.5 .._.._.__..__._____---
1 ---__.____.___..__..__.
1,5

27. Fila_menfous algae; periphyton ~_
_ 0 _~
1 _ _
_
__ 2 _
_
3 -
28. Iron oxidizing bactorialfungusT _ _
0 0.5 m___. 1 ___..-j
5
29~ Wetland plants in streambed ,
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other~01
Hems zu ana z~ wcus on [ne presence of upland plants, Item 29 focusos on iho presonce of aquatic ar w©Iland plants.
Notos: {use back side of this torm for additional notes.)
Sketch:
V l
$w~~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.'I S-~'~
Date: ! QL j- •20~
Evaluator: Gt?C"q~cf ~p-t'~~!'y(
Total Points: ~~
Scream (s et least intermittent
if Z 19 or renniaf (f z 30
Project: ~OhPyCUI~ ~Sf~e(1Wa
site: N~ ~ Ofd Deer Tr(.
County: ~~ ~~
Latitude: ~~~ 8 ~p~f
Longitude: r! 0 ~ 6 37
Other paU t~~
e.g. Quad (Dame: ~D J
A. Geomor bolo Subtotal =._._ Z / Absent : ; ; Weak Moderate . ~ Stron
1°. Continuous bed and bank
__._ 0
- 1 2____
2. Sinuosity
_
mN 0 1 --~-~ 2 _
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool soquence
....._._.._...._..~._..~_------.._.---._.-- ---------__._.._..._~ 0
W.___.___.._.__...___
_ 1~ 2 ~ 3

4, Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0 .
___ ___._.....____--
1 ---..._-___
2 _-._
3
5. Active/relic fioodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ____ 0 1 _ 2 __ _ 3 ___
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
B. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts

.~_~__._.-.____......_..._.^ _.__. ..~.
11. Grade controls 0

W..._.._~___..._.._.__..._ ~.
0

___~.-_.
0.5
.._._ ..
~
2
__.._ .._._._..
1 ~~

3
___-•
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
~~ 0 0.5 1 1.5
13.5econd or greater order channel on exlsiina
~
USGS or NRGS map or other documented No = 0 Yes ~3
~ evidence,
man-maao aircnes are nor rareo; see aiscussions in manual
R_ Nvrirnlnnv (Si ihtntal = ~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in chann
l
i 0
0 1
1 2 3
2 ~-.~
U
_
e
--~ or row
ng season __
1&. Leaflitter T _ ~_
1.5 1 0
5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18
Organic debris lines or
iles (Wrack lines) 0
0 0.5 ,
1 1.5
.
p 0,5 1,5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~ No _ _ _
0 ____._. _ _
__ ~ ,Yes = 1 ,5 _ _ _ _
C. Bioloav (Subtotal W ~ 2 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish 3
3
0 2
2
0.5 1 D
1 _ _ 0
1 1.5 .._
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (nose diversity and abundance) 0
0 0.5
0,5 1 1.5
1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _ ~ _ . ~ 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,5 SAV = 2.0; Other
••~.•••...... •.••~• o. • ,......~ ..•~ .. w- Fn covni.v v~ uN~anu ~Jlill n3, Irani La TVGUSaS Vn inL' pre5e[1Ce OT aquallC Or We~iand plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.}
--- - ----
Per~nnre_.P,~~r....._~-_~tr .... Soi~~~o ~a s
eXtcns-ye hed-ro~k r~~F~e ___
~~D
T~Q~/

,;,<
~`"~
5-12

North Catalina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identifica#ion dorm; Version 3.1 S` ~~ a
_Date: 2q fuwe 20 Io Project: ~UY1Pycuft ~sYee>7wa Latitude: 3i5, gg~(o
Evaluator: ~Pi--~~~ ~Q'~'~;tl"Vt site: 2~~ N ~~ vEd Aeer Tr. Longitude: - ~~, b3hS
Total Points: ~ M--~-Other
Stream is at least rntemiittent !~~ rJ' County: DV a ~e, e.g. Quad/Vamp: ~ayleQ f
if z 99 or erennial if z 30
mor holo Subtotal =___q __~
o
A. Ge
_
P ~Y~-_ -------~------- Absent __.
-~- _ ` _Weak_ _Moderate
- _ Strong _~_
---
_
_
..
..
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
-^---.--.-_---•-~--.-.----_ _--
3. fn-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
__
___- „_____._. ~_.__..__._ ._.._....._........_ .___....._ ....... ........__. 3
_
__
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting - 0 1 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 _ 2 3
__....________.....__..__....._...._..__._....__.
9"Natural levees ._ .___
0 1 2 3
10.I-feadcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 .5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagewa_y _ _
~~ _ ____ _0_ __ _ 0.5 __ __ 1
-~~~- 1.5
w__
13. Second or greater ordor channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No ~ Yes = 3
evidence.
"Man-made ditches arcs not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydro~.Y~Subiotal ___-,~.., _.~_^_.__.....--- ....____ _.__.___..__.._._- ------..._.._._..._.....____... .._..._
_._._.._...._..
GroundwaterFlow/dischar c.
9A.
g' 0 1 2 .
3
____ _ _
_
15 Water in channel and > 48 his since rain, or -
W
t
d
i
i
h
l
..
0 --.-
------
~1
L'f - -------.
__.._...
2 ___.__. __
_....___.._
3
er
n c
ry ar grow
~ season____
a
anne
--
16
Leaflitter
1
5
1 _ ...
5 -
~
.
_..._.-_ .-----.._~.__-_._____._.._..._-.-..._..____..-__.__

17. Sediment on plants or debris __.. .
_r________.

0
_....._.
__..._. ...._.

0.~ •
___._.._
---
1 .._._...... .
_._.._...._..__

1.5

debris linr~s or piles (Wrack lines)
18.Organic
0
0.5 --•--
1
1 5
-
_
19. Mydric soils {redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C; Biology (Subtotal =~
~_,~•_~r__,
-
20v. Fibrous roots m channel 3 2 1 0
.__.._.r, ._
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish_ _
----~---~-------•----__._._....__....._. _- -
-__.._.
_._ 0.5
_.____ _.__....._._.._
_ 1
-_.-.----.~._
.u. 1.5
..
.
25. Amphibians
0.5
1 _.. ._
.
__.-_.____.
1.5
26. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphytan __ __ _
_____ _ 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 _ _
1 - - _ _
- 1.5
---
29 .Wetland plants in streambed
FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; 013E = 1.5 5AV = 2.0; Other = 0
~' Items 2U and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
1
v~vxfr~e~n~e_-~~_at~_SO~~.n~_~._ 513A
O~
~`
d S r• ~.
~h
138

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5=~~? B
Date: g p~f Zoa9 Project: ~i}ht'ycu~f Csr~PNWay Latitude: 3~- SS9!
Evaluator: ~~i-q~~ ~0'~t~Yyi Site: Longitude:
l~(~esf of Cl,earbraok Dr. 7$. ~ 3~p
Tota! Points:
Sfream is at least irttemtitfent r'~. 5 County: ~ ~C',. Other p /Q,~.~
if a 19 or erennia! if a 30 ~ e.g. Quad Name: (~Qy(~ +
A. Geomorphology (subtotal~_ _ 8=___) ~Attsent `Weak Moderate Skrong
__
1°. Continuous bed and bank _
0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ~ _ Y _ _ 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches _ __
0 _ _^
~
1 _
2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
i deposils.__....._.__.__
_._.._
.
.
l
u 0 ~ _ 2 _~~-_
-~--. 3
~~~.~ .....
.
.
......
9° Natu al e
v
ees ....._._._..._
_.. ...
0 ..
1 _
..
2
3
10. iioadcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagoway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = 0~ Yes = 3
evidence.
rvien-moue oncnes are nog rateu; see aiscussrons m manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = Jam- ~ )

14. Groundwater Flow/discharge ----_..._ ..............._
0 ~..._~. __ _ _ T,_ _.._
2 ___.__._.._~__
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
W
l
i
h
d 0 1 O 3
~~_
a
er
n c
annel-
er r.or~rowin~ season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ^~ 0 ___~ 0.5 1 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1' 1.5
1~dric soils ~redoximorphic teatures)_presont? ___ _No 0 _ _!~~ N_ __Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~1 )
_
20 .Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel -__. ._._
3
3 ..W.~.____.._.._...
2
2 _.._._._.... ._ _--
1
1
0
0
_22. Cra~fsh 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
2A. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians
._.._.__._.~_~ --
0.5
1 .~- '~-~
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 -~~---_ ~__.._3
28. Iron oxidizing baclerialtungus. 0 0. 1 1
5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed .
FAC 0.5• FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
i~ems ~u ana n rocus on vte presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
_-~keirte~ _ !? Of lira fps( dt? Soi~ 4~0,_
5~13~
___
13a
S~ j~I
`~ (-'--
O

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 5
_......_
oats: q D~f ,~b09 Project: j~o~lPycu~~F +~SrePVlwa Latitude: ,3S', $gq~
Evaluator: t~E'I'Q~Cp ~0~-~~riq Site: ~-~~ ~ ~'~~e-~~~ Longitude: 7 $~ ~p ~~j~
Total Points:
Stream fs at least intermittent ~ County: ~,(, f7ther pa yle~
if 2 f 9 or arennia- if ~ 30 ~ - `~ ~ ~e' e, g. Quad Name: D
A. Gt;omorphology~Subtotai =__.,~_
____ _ Absent Weak -.
-~~~ Moderate Strong ':
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 __
__ 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 __
3 _
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequenco 0 ~ 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting __ _
_ 0 ~
1 __
~ ______ 2
- ___3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
__._ 1
. ~~ _
3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 _
3

8. Rocent alluvial deposits
0
1 _
3
98 Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Hoadcuts p 1 2 3
11, Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway _~_-_ ~. ~. 0 Q.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existina _ _ __ _ _
~~ ~ ~M `-"`-
USGS or NRCS map or othor documented No ~ Yes = 3
evidence.
Man-maoo UllGneS aro not raloo; see dISCU5Slon5 In manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 9 1
14. Groundwater flowidischarge
-.--...._ ...__W_Y__.__ .. ._~._._______.__m.__ 0
_----~._.__ 1
-.._._._.. 2
_ ___..__ 3
._.___...._,...._..
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
_ Water in channel -_- dry or.growir~ season__~_
---_-_ ._ _..__ 0
_
-_ 1
_~ ~
_.
_ _ ~
lJ
-_.
._ 3

16. Leafiiiter
17, Sediment on plants or debris _
1.5
0
1
0.5 _
_
_0.5 .._..~
1
_____O __._
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines} 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = ~~ 1 _
20 . Fibrous roots in channol~
-- - - -- -~ - ---__--.----_ _.._.._. _.__. _. __. ____ _.._._.---. _.... _
21 . Rootod lams in channel __ _ _ _ ___ 3
_._...._- . - 0
3 2 _

2
0.5 _ 1

1
~ 0
~
-~----
23. Bivalves .
0 __.._ ___.
1 .`_
.~_
2 ..
3
24. Fish _-_~_- ~

P_
_-_ 5_ Am hibians___..._._..._..._......___......~..._........._____..._._...._..._...__. 0
0
._._...-----..
_ 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5

26. Macrobenthos (noto diversity and abundance) .__..
_
0 __._..._..
_._ .........
0.5
....__..............._.----..__.
1
___...W. _.__.T._.._...
1,5

27. Filamentous algae; periphytonM`--
0 _
_
_ 1
~
-
_ 2
- _
3
_28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0
0.5
1
~5~
29 etland plants in streambed
- --- _
FAG 0.5• FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
__
..~..,~ ~.. nn~ ~, wwa vn we pivovrw~ vi upmiiu punts, nom ca focuses on me presence or aquatic or weUantl plants.
Notes: {uso bactc sido of this form for additional notes.}
Ae~ejvnia~~5 -~ ~ wiaRe . Map/~i~ tni'
---~---- -r r-----
Soil N'iaD

F""-
J

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 s- IJr
Date: q OGt 2dU~ Protect: yonc~cu~~` rsYeehwa Latitude: ,3J+", 89/D
Evaluator: ~~~-d~~ ~q'~,CYt't 5fte: rj~ye Cr Q Mourn;n ~y~Longitude: 7g • 6 J?6
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2 / County: ~ Q,, /eQ~
if Z 19 or erennia! if Z 30 ! ~ e` e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hole Subtotal =~ ~`~'S ~ _____ Absent:
_ .Weak ~ _ Modera
to Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank _ 0 1 _
- 2 3
2. Sinuosity -__ _
0 T---_
...- _ _ 2
- _ 3 __,__.
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
- ~ 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
5. Active/relic floo_dplain
__ _______
- 0 1 2 3 -~-
6. Depositional
bars or benches __ __ __
0 __
1 _
_
2- - _
'- 3
_
_
7. Braided channel -..~.~_ _------- -~ --- _
-~~ 1 _._ -_ 2 -_ ..- 3 _._.
8. Recent alluvial deposits
----_..._._____._-_-_.-----..__..~---.---.__-__ .................__......._
9°Natoral levees 0
_..__.-. ,,.

_.._..
p 1
..._.- .-__...___.._.

._ 2
._._...._...---.--___._..._.
2 g
_..----_-..._.3 ____--
10.lieadcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainagoway -- - _
^ 0
w _ 0 0.5
0.5
~__-~~ i
~
~_-- .5
1.5
-"`-'"'--~---
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidenre. No ~0 Yes = 3
man-maaa oncnas are nee ratoa; sae aiscussions ~n manual
R Hvrlrnlnnv fR~~hintai = 5 • ~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel •- dry! or growing season 0 1 ~ 3
_--
16. t•eatlitter
1.5
1
0,5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris- 0 0. 1
1.5
18. prganic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 _
~ ` ~ 1.5
19, Hydric soils {redoximorphic features} present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = ___-. ~ _~_)
20 ,Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
..___..
......... .....---------.-___._.._... 0
..._...___._._____.------.... 0.5
..-..._.._._ 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note di
( vorsity and abundance} _.
0 _
- ~_.
0.5 ..__...----.---------.--_..--
1 ---_.__~_-_--
1.5
27. Filamentous algae periphyton 0 _
1 -- __
2 -- _------}3 ---
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1
5
_
29 . Wetland plants in streambed .
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBt_ = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
~cems eu ana [~ rocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
~tin~r'rwif or ~en,itiel. s =S ~ wide ----- M~,t•n~ny rove
----~-
~. _. S-I5
u
L
V

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.9 S 2~
Date: f(~ ~C~' ~~~~
Evatuator: Gerald ~o~tQrvt
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
if ~ J9 or perennla! if z 30
Latitude: 3/~ • 89 $',~
Other UJ
e. g. Quad Name: ~QJ 1[°Q~
~c~.la~ ~ County:
A. Geomor hology (subtotal =~1_7•~__) ___ _ _ Absent ^ _ ` Weak Moderate ~` Strong''-
1H. Continuous bed and bank
----~--.~...._._-~ _0
--- 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 _ 1 --- -----2 - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 __ __
_ 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel __A ~~ _ 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvia! deposits___ 0 -_
1 3
9° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRC5 map or other documented No ~0 Yes = 3
evidence.
swan-mace ai[cnos are no[ ra[oa; seo aiscussans m manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = y 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ___ _
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or __._._ _ 0 __
~ ____ 1 __ 2
_ 3
_____.
Water in channel -- dr,~ or,grow~ soason „_„ 0
.-.~________ 1 2 3
16. Leafiitter 1.5 1 0.5 p
17. SedimenE on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1,5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes - 1.5.
C. Biology (Subtotal = ~ ! )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 p
-21,,., t2ooted plants in channel_ _._~_,.-.. - _..._ 3 _-- _._-_.-~- ._._._.~.
- __ _ 1 0

22. Grayfish
0
0.5
1 ~.~.
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
25. Amphibians 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
i 1.5
1.5
_26. Macrobenthos (note divorsily and abundance) _
- _ _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0

_ _
1
___...--
2 -- _--_~__ 3T_----
Z8. iron oxidizing bacterialFun~us. 0 0.5 1 i
5
29 . Wetland plants m streambed .
FAC = 0.5`_FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Glher = 0
i[ems w ana z i rocus on [ne presence or upiano plants, item z9 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Sketch:
Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes.)
~ ~i~ey~ dice-Q u~ s~ Tom; t/ /~G~=-
Project: ~oh~ycu~t ~sreevlwa
stte: I~ C C~IG~~~~~ Dr,
~t/a ke.
~~L~
_,.~
~~~~-
~Q

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~"
Date: /LI ~ ~~(~~ Project: NohPycu~t (sreenway Latitude: 3$'.9'p00
Evatuator: Geralr.~ ~'o~terv~ :site: P17~ T>r~e ~i~r~_o_u~~i ~ t.ongituae: 7g, f, 306
Total Points: Other
Stream 1s at least intermittent ~1 ~ County: ~~ J ~af~~~°a' f
O'~ ~t/~ ~~ e.g. Quad Name: J
it z 9 or erenniat !f z 30
ai /
A. Geomor holo y (Subtotal =__!!' ~__) Absent : 'Weak
~ Moderate: ` Strang
1B. Continuous b_ed and bank_ _
~^T- _ _ 0
_ 1 2 3
2, Sinuosity 0 1 _
2 _ _
3
eE structure: riffle-pool se
quence
3. In-chann 0 1 2 3
_
_
_
_____
_4. Soil texture or stream substrate_ sorting 0 ~ __
_ 1 __ 2 __
- 3
5. Activelrelic floodplaln 0
~ _ _ 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars nr b_e_n_ches _
- 0 _
_
_ 1 ~
-2 3
7. Braided channel
-- 0 __ _ _ 1
~ _
___
- - 2 ~~ 3

8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 B Natural levees
__......-- --_.
0
0
__
----
1
1
~...
- --.._
2
2 __
3
3
10 Hea_dculs
~ 0
____ ~ - 2 -- --- 3 ---
11.Grade conErols 0 0.5 1.S-
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0,5 1 _ _ 1.5 _
~• - W _--
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence, No ~ Yes = 3
`Man-matlo dilchos are not rated; soepd~-iscussions in manual
R Hvrtrnlnnv lSuhfntal = C~ ~~ 1
--. -...._. ----.....__._.._......_.____.----
_ 14. Groundwater flowldisc_harge --•----...._.-._..w-...
0
~.. _..~_.___..
1 x
~ .._ -
2
-
---~-~
3
_._---
~~~~-
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
_ _ Water In channel=dry
or~rowin season ~ ~ ~ 3
_
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5 __ _ ___
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5

18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric solEs (redoximorphic features} present?
_ 0 ~ _ _ _0.5__ _
- ~- -No 0 ~~~ . _.. .._
____ 1 1.5
Yes = 1.5 _
C- Bioloav lSuh#ntal = ~v 1
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
T_ .V..-.._...__.._-...__-.._._.-_.._.__..____...._._.__..._.__.._....._.._-_.
21 . Rooted plants in channel
..__.---•-. _-.- -T_m_m_._.____._T._... 3
_.__.._...._..
3
_- 2

2
____.._.._-. 1

1
_ ..- __. 0
_......... ..
0

22. Crayfish
23. Bivalves
0
0
_ 0.5
1
1
2 _
1.5
3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (noto diversity and abundanco) 0
0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ___ 0 1 2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 ----- 1-WW 1 5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Oiher~-
uems zv ana zf focus on the presanco or up~and plants, nom z5 focuses on the presonco or aquatic or wolland plants.
Notes: (uso back side o(tlils form for additional notos.) Sketch: ~,~+ lI ~r~y ~ ~
i
_ s ~u~ ~~ _.._... ._._ S -~ i , t
r ~etgc.~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 , j -~ ~~
-- __ _ q _
Date: j"( U~" ~(~09 Project: ~{aht~yCU~ tSl"+PPYIWU Latitude: ~ ~j < ~pa~5
Evaluator: ~C~-a~~ ~a'~,"~~rVt stte: N ~f g~itTree POi~c~ Longitude: ~- ~,~~?
Total Points: Other /,r~>
Stream is et least intermittent f~ ~ ~ ~ Gounty: ~~ ~~ e.g. Quad tVame: ~~~[ ~ ~T
if Z •9 or arennla! if Z 30 I
~., r
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal _ ~_~ ! ~ ~ _ Absent
~ ` . Weak 'Moderate Strong .. `'
1~. Continuous bed and bank
-- 0 1
-
---- 2
-~-
~--- 3
-
2. Sinuosity __- 0 1 2 3
-.-
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
_ 4._Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ___0_ __ __ __ 1_ - _ _ _ 2 _
T - 3
5. Active/relic floodplain _ 0 1 2 3
_______
6. Depositional bars or bunches 0 1 2 3
--_
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits Y_.._.___._.___.___.__...._...._.
9B Natural levees _
~
_._..._.._ 0
_.
0 __
1
~_ 1
_..
1 _ -
2
2
2 3
3

3
10, Readouts
11. Grade controls 0
0 ~
0,5 2
1 3
1.5
12, Natural valley or drainageway _„___...-p_._.._...._._ _.__ 0.5 1
__... i.5~ _
~~~_..._________
_
13. Second~or greater order channel on existing
tJSGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ' No ~ Yes = 3
"Man-mada ditches are not rated; sea discussions in manual
R- Hvdrntnnv (Subtotal = I ~ 1
__.__, _..,....._____.._.._....__..-.___...._.~...._.~.__
14. Groundwater flowldischarge ___ ~_-_ ._._......._..___.-__---
0
_____.
'."•- ----._..___.-.r-.
1
_
~~ ......_-____-.-.__
2
-- -_._- ----
3
-.-.
15. Water in channel and ~ 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 ~J
Water in channel or growing season
_^-_.-_._-T__._.
16.Leaflitter
_-___
1.5
1
_ 0,5
_ 0 -
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
debris Ilnes or piles (Wrack Einos)
18.
Organic ~
~:5 1 1.5
,
-
- __........
19. Hydrlc soils (rodoximorphic features) presenk? ....._..._......~--
_-_--_..-...._.. ___..___._..
_______.
___.__--_ No = 0 ~~ _ _
---.-.._.-....
_-Yes 1.5 - _
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = ~ ~ )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0

21 _Rooted plants in channel .. _.
3
2
1
0
- ~~~- _--
22. Cra fish -
0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves caa c 1 ct tM s
__,-__..._....-----_____ -
__--- ----P--- 0
_~~ 1
_ 2
__.._..__..... 3
..
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26, Macrobonthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0,5 - _ 1 .5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ _
-- 0
1
2 -
mm
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _ _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
-29 . Wetland plants in streambed~- _
FAC = 0,5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0 _
- Items 20 and z~ focus on the presence of upland plants, Item za focuses on the presence of aquaGC or weuand plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
e~~r~t~__~ P,, ~~"~ ~~~ sa~T~~a~1~___
P~
,~ s~zz
~~, .~,
..~... -
j ~......-..._.~,,_
/ ~
~i ~
ot~'~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~-~3
Hate: j ~ UC.~" ~(~(~ Protect: ~onPycu~f ~si"eertwa Latttt,de: ,~,,,e', 9pp$'
@vatuator: ~~,i-u~~ ~0'~,~t'Vi Site: ,~~~ -~~/~) ~~u,~~~ Long[tude: ~'8', d 310
Total Points: _L____ Other ]~
Stream is at least tntermiftenf ~~ county: ~~ ~t'_. e.g. Quad Name: LJ ~y~ed~
!f z 9 or arenrria! if Z 30
A. Geatn~holagy .(Subtotal =_o{ Sr~?_) "Absent :. ~Weak~ Moderate Strong : ';'
1". Continuous bed and bank 0
___~__ 1
~ 2 _ 3 ___
2, Sinuosity
~~ 4 1 2 3
___ __
3. In-channel structure: rune-pool sequence
4. Solt texture or stream substrate sorting 0
0 ___ 1
____ 1 2
2 3
3
-
5. Activefrelic floodplain __ 0 __ ______ 1 _ 2 ~3 ~ M
__ _
6. Deposi#ional bars or benches T 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 -.. _.__. 1 -- -- 2 -- 3 -
_...__._._ _-........._...
8. Recent anuvial deposits_ _
9" Natural levees
.___. .__
0
0
_....._.v.._.._._..__...--- 1
1
----._ _._.._.__... 2
2
.____..-........._...._._.__.._ 3
3
-- ___._... ._.____~ _._._.
10. Headcuts Q 2 3
_
11, Grade controls ~ ~ _-~
_-._._-._._._-_-..._ _ _._._-.
_
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0
----.___.___._.__.W___.
0 0,5
_ ~_. _._._
0.5 1
_ _. _._~.
1 1. _`

1.5
_ _
_
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. • _T
__
No = 0 _____
Yes 3~
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
E'er
R_ Hvrirnlnny fSuhtntal = ~~ «~ )
14. GroundwaterfEow/discharge ~ ~ ~ 0 1^- -~2 3

15, Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1
2 _
_
~ 3~
Wator in channel- dry_or growing season _J._~_-
- .__._.__.._____-.__ _~__.__
- -
- - -
-
16, Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 __
1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines ar piles (Wrack lines) ____ __ 0 0.5 1 1.5
19_Nydric setts (redoximorphic features} present? No = D Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal T 1,~~ 1

_. -._..~
v .-
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
~r--
3

2

1
- -~.
0

21 . Rooted plants in channel _.
3
2
1
0
22. Craynsh 0 0.5 1 1.5
^~
23. Bivalves _
0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5

25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 _
1.5
26. M_acrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} _
~ 0 0.5 ___ 1 1,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaffungus. _ _____
+~ _ 0 0.5 i 1.5
tiand plants in streambed
~29 . Wei- __
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1, SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
-items 24 and l1 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item L5 tocusos on the presence of aquatic or Wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) > Sketch:~~ Q _~ ~-t~ ~ ~ ~j vP~

"~~
~~
S-~
ti ;
1

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 ~'•-ay
Date: ~ ~ opt a o0 9 Project: ~f ohPycuft ~sr~~v-wa~ Latitude: ,~ ~ , yp/(
Evaluator. ~e~-Q~~ ~0'~~EYH Site: ~~~~ 0~ ~~tM~I S'iZi: Longitude: '~~~ ~j ~~(~
'Cotal Pints: Other u
Stream !s at least Intermittent ~~~ ~ County: ~~ k'~ e.g. Quad Name: ~aJ ~~~~
if Z j 9 or perennial if ~ 30
c
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_____~ ~ _)
'Absent
Weak
'':Moderate
Strong' ;;
~
1e. Continuous bed and bank
-~ 0
-- 1
-- 2 ~~
2. Sinuosity 0 1 ~_____ 3
3. in-channel stnrctura: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or steam substrate sorting __ 0
_ 0 _ 1
__ 1 2
2 3
3

5. Activelrelic floodplain ______
0
1
2 _ _
3 -
_
6. Depositional bars or benc__hes _____ 0 _ ___ 1 __
_
2 - _
3
7. Braided channel 0 1^ _
_
2 _
3
8. Recentalluvlaldeposits___
9a Natural levees 0
0 -1
1 2
2 3
3
_ 10, Headcuts_ ___ _..._
W __ 0 _._.. .____ 1 _~ ~~Y- 2 ~ ~ _3 -~
v
-
11. Grade co
ntrois
~ 0 0.5 1 1.5
_ _ _
_
.
12. Natural valley or drain_ageway __
_-_ _0_,___.___ _
. ___~ 5 __._.__ _
1 T _
_ 1.5 _
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
E1SGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes
"Man-mado dilchos aro not ralod; son discussions In manual
13. Hvdrnloav (Slthtatal = ~ ~ 1
14, Groundwater flowldischarge ~__
...r_ ..__._.__ __.___------....._.._...___.__..._ _.__. 0
_...__.___......_, 1
... _.._....._~____.. 2 ~ 3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
1 .___._.__._ __..--
2 __
3
_. _ Water. in channel.--dry or growing season _~,.~ _-
~
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
_...__.....____.____.-----__......._..__.. _..__-
19. Hydrlc soils (redoximorphic features) present? .__-____.-T.._..____..__._____._
No = D ..__._.. ._.-___ ._ ___ .
Yes - 1,5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~J,.- }
20 .Fibrous roots in channel
21 .Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
0

22. Crayfish __._ -_..._.._......._.._.......___--
23. Bivalves ~?NQ. C~~IMS _.._.~-------•----
-- 0 -
- 0 -~--
- 0.5 --

-
._-'-~---
____, 1 _
2 ..- _
---1.5
-- 3
24. Fish _
~---- 0
~
-~----- 0.5
--_~
J~ 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (noto diversity and abundance) __ 0
0
-~~ 0.5
0.5 ~ 1
1 --~ 1.5 -~--
1,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 _
1 2 3 ~~
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
`_
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
__
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
Items zu and 27 focus on the presence of upland plants, Itom 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Skal-~~,., _ _~ _....__._
Noses: {uso back side of this form for additional notes.) -- ~-_--•---~_-.... ~ _
r _ __ ~"'~,~'~~
~S~~il ar~d __
_ .~ u
,~ ~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~ - ~~
Date: ,;2~ ,7Ju~~ a~,~ Project: ~Oht?yCU~F ~sre~vlWay Latitude: ~5„ c/~~3
Evaluator: GCr-a~C~ ~0'~Ei'V>, site: ~ ~ { 0~ t~Gf~ T~yty.~ ~ Longitude: ~~~'p (~ ~ ~ ~;2,
Tota! Paints: other
Stream is of feast intermittent ~~,~ County: ~~ ~~ ~'~y~Pa F
e,g. G?uad tvame:
it z f9 or erennia! if z 30
_A. Geo_morphoiogy (Subtotal =__ ~.~ ~ V ~.__ `Absent Weak ''Moderate Strong'
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 i __ 2
~ 3
2. Sinuosity
-- 1
- 2 3
--
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1 ---
2
3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2 _
_ 3
5. Active/relic floodplain _
~ ~-~ _~_
_
0
___.__ 1
~
y___. __
_
2 3

6. Depositional bars or bunches
0
_
1 _
2 __
__
3
7. Braided channel _ ~- __.__~~_
8. t2ecent alluvial deposits _ _______
9° Natural levees ~_-~~
0
0 1
1'
1 _ 2 _ -
2
2 ~- 3
3
3
10. Headcuts O 1 2 3
_ _ _ _ ~ ~
11. Grade controls
_
~- ~T
~__ ~4 _
0.5 _ -_
_
1 _ _
_
1.5
_ _ _
12. Natural valley or drainageway _..
_ _ _ 0_
~ -^ 0.5 mm _
-~1 ~
~~~-~~--~-~ ~ 1.5
~
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NftCS map or other documented
evidence. '
No -~~-4-~~~~
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; sue discussions in manual
B. Hvdr~lnav lSuhtotal = fn • ~ 1
14. Groundwater flowldischarge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 - ___
3
Water in channel -- ~ o~rowin~-season ,_,._.
~
~
~ __ ___ _ __ _-_ _ _. T a__
~
!
_16. Le_aflitter _
_
_
_ _ _ __
_ 1.5
_.___ 1
~ 0,5 0

17. Sediment an plants or debris
0
0.5
^ _
1 _
__
_
___
1.5
_
18 _Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines) __
-
_
.
0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric sobs {redoximorphic features) present? __ No 4 Yes = 1.5
C. t3ioloav (Subtotal = ~ ~~ 1
20t'. Fibrous roots in channol
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1_
1 0
0
22. Crayfish -----~ ___
23. Bivalves-- -~.. _-.._._-_______._._..__ ~~~~~~~~--~~~-- 0~~
`___1,~.1....-....._ 0.5 -.__
_.._ 1 - ~y 1
~ 2 1.5~
---3_
- -
24. Fish _ _
T-
~ - ---- 0
~~- 0.5 1 1.5
25~Amphibians
_
26. Macro_benthos_noto diversit -.~--~ __-.-._..._.----._.__--_.
_ _ (_ y and abundance)
~~~ ~ 0
-._..._.._~____
0 _ 0
__..__ ._._._..__
0.5 1
__..._......_...__.-_----._--._
1 __
_ 1.5
------__.__....___
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
-------~- 0
_._~~-
_---- 1
--~- - 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing_bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 - 1 1.5
29 ,Wetland plants in streambed _
FAC 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0;~ Qiher = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Itam 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
$4afrh•
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
_. ~h ~'rniif-~-end-~ .+_~c~ ~ ~iz.~<~ <.~ ~o~r ~ !~I ~ ~ ~
..____~~ --~- 5~1.~ f ~- U -ill.. 4:~_0~ ~? ~~i _,~~il~~._~ .
~'~~~"'1
~ ~- ~ -~~~
~ C~
GY'et~~v~}Qy
`~"uvlvt~~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.9 ~"~~~
Date: l ~ ~ C7` ~~l Q / Rroject: NOhPyCll ~~ CSY~PNWQ Latitude: ~~ r ~(~~
Evaluator: Gerald ~alltervt site: ~ptiP cuf~(~'~ SyII oul1~~" Longitude: ~~'. ~, CIO
Total Points: ~ ~1~ Other p
Stream Js at least intemTittent t -" ~ County: ~~ ~'~ e.g. Quad Name: ~~y/~~
tf z 9 or eronnia! ii Z 30 I
~ iz r~
A. Geomor hoP iogY Subtotal =___~ ` =__ Absent.: ;Weak': Moderate`: :Strong :;;.
1°. Continuous bed and bank
~~~. 0
____ 1 _
_W____ _ 2 _
3
u
2. Sinuosity 0 1 _ 2 3 ----~-
3. In-channel structure: riffle»pool sequence __
__ 0 _
-~~ __ 1 _ _ 2 3

4. Sell texture or stream substrate sorting __
0
__
1
2 - _
__
- 3
5. Active/relic floodplain _ ____ 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
---~---- --- 0
- 1
""~ 3
_
7. Braided channel ^ 0 1 2 ---- - ----.__3 ._..-.__
U t alluvial deposits
_ 8. Recen _._..____.....___._......_.~...___~._..___.-....._.....__
9 Natural levees
10. Neadcuts 0
-_-_._._.._ _._._..._.._
0~__._
0 1
..--.---.---._...---..
- 1
1 2
....__-...... _._._..----
2
2 3
._.____----.._..._...._._
3
3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 ~ 1.5

12. Natural valley or drainageway ~_-
_ _ 0 ~_
-~ _ 0.5 ~-
V- ~
__ _1 _
1.5
13.~~Second or greater order channel on xie sting
tJSGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ~
--
Yes
"Man-made ditches arv not ralvd; see dfiscussions in manual
R_ Hvrlrnlnnv fSuhtntal = I I " ~'1
14. Groundwaterflow/discharge 0 1 2 3
__
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _______
__
0 _
1 _
2 _____
- 3
Water in channel -- dry or.growin~ season ___
- __ _, _ _ _
-
16. t_eaflitter .5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or.pilos (Wrack lines),.,-._-__-_._ __-_-___ ~ ..-_._- _-_,.__, ~ ~5 _..~ .__
.
_
~ 1.5 -~
19. Wydric soils (redaximorphic features) present? .
No = 0 .
_.....
.__.
._.___
Yes ._.
- 1.5
f~ t'"-
C. 13ioloav (Subtotal = / ~l ' a 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 ,Rooted plants in channel
__-. - _ W__.__-....-..._.~_.-.----_._...~...... 3
3
._. _ 2 ___
2 ~
___._- .~__ 1
1
_..T,______. 0
0
22. Crayfish -- -._._...._--- _--------~---- 0
~ 0,5 _.-- - 1 - 1.5------
23. t3ivalves
--.W-.-.._.__
--- 0
- 1
---.._.___._.._.
. 2 3
-._____.~
_-
24. Fish __.~_____.__ --__-.__....._._
. 0 ._
.._
0,5 _--.__-. _-~
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
__ __ 0 _
- 0.5
0.5 _ 1
_ 1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ _ _
.._. - ____ 0 1
~ - 2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _ _ 0 0.5 _
1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed __
FACT 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presvncv of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the prosonca of aquatic or wot]and plants.
Sketch: ~
Nolas: (use back side of this form for additional notes.} ~ ~ ~
~?~~_~vi l~x~ ~-S ~~- ~~~_ ho t,v~r ~'~. -- ;~~, ~ ~. s ~-ASP
-. _ ~r-~
~..S'~(~
.~.. 4 --
S-~3

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 ~~'~b
Date: ~~ ~~~~+'~ ~(~p~ Project: ~jonQyct~tt ~r~evtwa Latitude: ~~,.~ - ~U~ ~~
Evaluator. Gera~~ ~o~-tervt slte: ~ p f ~7~62~' Ctk~{- ~~7f ~~ Longitude: 7~• ~,;~$'~j
Total Points: {~J Other J
Stream is at least intermittent ~b <~ County: YV ~ k~ e,g, Quad 1Vame: ~~yr ~~~
if z 9 or erennlaf If Z 30
A. Geomor holo Subtotal ~~ l~__~ _, `Atssent '`: ` Weak~~ Moderate ;. Strong '.
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 _ 1 2 3
_
2. Sinuosity __._ _ _ _ 0 1 2 _ 3
.
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
substrate sorting
4. Soil texture or stream 0
0 ___ 1
_ 1 2
2 ~ 3
3
_
5. Active/relic floodplain _ _ ____
- 0 __ _ 1 mm 2_
VyV 3
_
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
_ 1 _ __
2 _
_
v~3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3

8_Recent alluvial deposits__.-______.___ ___ ".__. __
9a Natural levees __..._ _._.. _._._..____
.___ 0
0 _.
1
__. 1 _ _.w.
2
-_... 2 _,__
~
~ ----__. .._..
3
_- 3
10. Readouts 0 1 2 3
_
11. Grade controls
~~ 0
~~~~ 0.5 __
1 1.5
_
12. Natural valley or drainagewayTmm-____..-
0
----"-!"__.
0.5
.._.__.._....__._..__
_._. _
~1
_
_ _
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ~
No ~J _
__
Yes = s
`Man-matle dilcnos are not ratotl; seo a~scussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal W ~ • ~ 1
-------~..._._..._......_._....__..__._.__.. .-----..-_.
14. Groundwater flowldischarge
...___..._._r.-.____-~. __...__-_
0
-_.`.._ .T-.._..---
1
_ -.-.. _-.._._._.
2
._....-~_.__..._.__..-- __. ..-
3
-.._~_._-

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
0
/.mot
/
2 ~._
3
Water in channel.-- dry or growing season__ ~__
16. t.eaflitter _
1.5 ~
_ p.5 _- ___.____. _.__WM__
___m_._ 0 _
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5

18_Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0.5
0 _.~ _ _.
1 1.5
_- _ _
_ 19~Hydrie sons {redoximorphic features) present? -- _ _ - _
__ _-
No 0
---~--
Yes 1.5
C~J
-~ ~ ~
3 t~
~ o q.
~ ~ ~V
~_.-.~
.~
z
3
0
1
:>
1 • ra
1-~
L1
f~..
C. Sioloav (Subtotal = .~^ ~~ )
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2 1
1 0
0
22. Crayfish _ ~_ _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0,5 1 1.5
25.Amphiblans ~iarycca, Kcrwct--------....._..---------
26. Maerobenthos (noto diversity and abundance} _ --._._.......~......_...._._
0 ....___- 0.5
0.5 ~
1 _
1.5
1.5__
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton __ 0 1 2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. __ 0 0.5 _ _
~ 1 ~ ~ ____
1.5

29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
_
FAC 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBi. = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
2
ts.~i
U
i
t
l
a.~
Items 24 and 2f focus on tho presenco of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence o! aquatic or wetland plants.
~ ~~s.~
sketcn,
p~-r~'~l Notos: (use back sido of this form for additional notes.)
c:.~~si~ ~rr~ivr s ire Gtle:~~a~~d C°~ ~r~r~e~~~ow~li~t~.
yt~ Sj'1 ~zt~'~, d?2 :SOI ~ l~1't~
~ I ~ rr~ tlc~ ~a~ ~~ - ~~
J /
Gl~cll~t~~ il~~s~7ht:~ ~vt Y~~Gt~,
r~w~:t-~ri~t;
~>r~rzt{~d .jusf a1~uc~
poU,serli+~e x+ vty otz
sc_t~t'e ~ y.5~y, I'ii'"E'h
s-a~ ,~
~`~~U1
-
We~ ~~

Nor#h Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~.-fig
Date: ~~ QG~OI''F'i' ~~Q / Project: Non~yCU~ ~Tf ~PNWQ Latitude: ~ ~~ _ t~~ ~j ,nj~
Evaluator: Get^a~c~'pa~ervt .site:' ~~f ff~af~yt~f~GavrikPtrLongitude: ~gH (,~f~
'total Points: /
Stream is at least fnrermfnent ~'j~a ~ County: ~~ ~'e, Oy, Quad Name• Wa ~ ~ i es
if Z 9 or eronnia! ff a 30 '
A. Getamarphology (Subtotal ~..~f ~___ `Absent : ". Weak `Moderate ` Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank
--- 0
_~^
- ~~ 1
----
~---~- 2 __
---~-~~
~ 3
2. Sinuosity 0
__
_ 1 2 3
_
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence _
.
0 1 _
2 3
4. Soil texture or stream su_b__strate sorting____ 0 1 2
~ 3
5. Active/relic floodplain _______ _
~ 0 _ 2 3

6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 _
3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3

8_,Recentalluvial deposlts._______ ._v__ ______~_^`
9° Natural louses
_",,, . 0
0
1
1 ------
2
2 _ --
3
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls _ _ __ _
TM ~ ___ 0 _ 0.5 __ __ 1 1.5

_ _
12. Natural valley or drainageway
~
____ 0__
~
"
0.5
1 _
1.5
13. Second or greater ordor~channel on existinct
L1SGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ' --°----~
T'
-
No ~ ____..-___.-.._. ___.__.
Yes = 3
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R t-Ivrtrninnv (SEihtntal= 3•~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _ 0 _
~ 2 3
Water in chan__nel -_dry or Orowin~season _, ~__ __.______ _ __ ___
V
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18_Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack
lines) 0 0.5 1 " .._. 1.5
,
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? ~.. _ .
No 0
Yes = 1,5
C. Biology {Subtotal = _!~, 7 )

20 .Fibrous roots in channel
3 -- -
2
1 ---
0
21 .Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0. 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (Hato diversity and abundance)
____ ___. T _ ___ 0. 1 1.5
27, Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 __
2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun~us. 0.5 1 1,5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"items 20 and 21 Locus on ilia presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plant
Sketch: ~
Notes: {use back side of this form for additional notes.) ~~
.._. ~ I
~~iM
_~.~~~~_.__SGt~h.{~-,-3 ~h Solt a~fG~ -~
~~a~
s.
i ~
.~
~~
'~ ovtil~~~
~~
~~~

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 _S"~'~ `~
Date: ~C~ ~~~ ~~(,~~ Pro)ect: ~OY?P3/C(!~ CSY~EhWQ Latitude: ~~, ~~~~'
Evaluator: Gerald 'PO~~!"4t Site: ~ ,~ ~ ~lflydht ~c{ Long-tude: ~`'~,.. (~ ~ ~~y
Tota! Points: Other dry-,~r~ ~"
Stream is at le~stlntermlttent %.~~. U County: ~~ ~e, e.g. Quad Name• ~~~~ iVt `~L
!f z 79 or erennia! it a 30 t
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__~ Absent '-Weak , ` Moderate
~ ,Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank ___ 0 __
^ ___ 1
~ 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 ~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 ~
2

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
--
V~
-
____ __ _
5. Activelrelic floodplain _~ _
_ _
?•~ _
~
1 _ _
_
_
2 ___
_ 3
6. Qepositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel ___..~~_._.~^- 0 _
1 _
~- 2 -----3 -
8. Receni alluvia! deposits
9° Natural levees 0
0 1
1 ~ 2
2 3 ~~
3
10. Headcuts 0 1 ____. _ ~~~ W____ 3 _
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5'

_ 12, Natural valley or drainageway_ _ _
__0____
0.5
°~"~"'°"""
1
-~--~~-~~-~ _
1.5
-_
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence, •
No ~ ----- .__
Yes = 3
"Man-mado ditches are not rated; solo discussions In manual
R Hvrirnlnnv 1Suhtntal = l• ~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge _
µ 0
'
~
~~ 1
2
3
15. Water In channel and
> 48 hrs since rain, or _
__
~
l
Q __ _____
_
____
~ _~___ .2 _~ 3~
Water In channel -- dr r~or growing season ~

16. Leaflilter
__
1.5 _ __ ___ _ _
1
0
5
0
_
ediment on lams or a rls
_ _ _
_
_
_
0.5_ __ 1 1.5
_ __
18. Organic debris linos or Iles Wrack lines _
____
~
-
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphlc features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Blolaav (subtotal = tl" ~ 1
20 mFibrous roots in channel 3 2 _ 1 0
__._.
21 .Rooted plants fn channel
3 _
2
1
Q
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 _
1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 ~ 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
- 25_ Amphibians _ L?tlt~C~.t. _____ ~ ~ __ _ __ __ 0 0.5 1 1.5
26, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunda_n_co)
_ 0 _
~ 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _ 0
_ 1 ~T2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0.5 1 __
1.5
__ ______
29 atland plants in streambed~~ ~~ _ _
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Ottier = 0
- Hems zu and zi tocus on the presenco of upland plants, Rem z9 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wotland plants.
Skoich:
Notes: {use back sido of this form for additional Holes.) r~( )
______.~- _ ~l1
~'-'"P»c~f'a.(jT...~"~f- INi~~~r~~ Sal wrt~ ~ -~~~ ___~.~ut2~~Y_
~'~~~ \
w

North Carolina Division of Water quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~"'~?L~
Date: ~~ (?r.r~O~x~~ aDO f Project: NO~eyCU~f ~sl'~ePNW4y Latitude: ~ ~ _ 9t3~
Evaluator: G21'g~c~ ~o~terta Site:' ~ ~ ~ t,~~dk~ ~~ ~p0~ Longttt,de: ~~',. 6a ~ ~
Total Points: Other {-
Stream is at least intermittent ~ ~', ~ County: ~~ k'~ g,g, quad fVame: ~ C{ ~ ~ c~>rr.'s~
if z 9 or erennial tf Z 30

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__ ~~~~--) °: Absent `; Wt3ak; ,
~ Moderate '
~ ,;Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank
~
-~ 0
--__^~ 1
- 2 3
2. Sinuosity
_ _
~ 0 1 2 _
3
3. In-channel structure; riffle-_pool sequence 0 1 _
2 3

4. Soi! texture or stream substrate sorting ~.____. _ _
___
~ 0 _ __
_
~ 1 _ _

_M~....---
2 _

-
_3
~
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1
~
~ 2 3
6. bepositional bars or b_e_nc__h_es
~ ^ __ 0 __ __
__
1 2 3
7. Bra(ded channel ~ 0 1 _
2 ~ _
W 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits_ . ____ , _ ___ __,y_..__.. , ...
98 Natural levees _.__ ____ 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
10. Headcuts 0 T 2 3

11. Grade controls
0
0.5
_
1 ____. .._
1.5
..._ _-..-~ _..~___..____
12. Natural valley or drainage_way _
~ _.._..._....._._..__
_ 0 _. _._._ .m._.~..._.__
_
0.5
~ ._._.__..
1
--- ---
1.5
-~---______.._._..
13. Second or greater order channol on oxisting
USGS or NRCS map ar other documented
evidence. ' No "~0 Yes = 3
_ teen-maao aitcnas are not rates; soo alscussions rn manual
B_ Hvdr~l~nv (.r,tihtntal = .S ,.t.~ 1
14. G_raundwater_flow/discharge ___ 0 _____ 1
W _ 2 3 __
15. Water in channel and > 46 hrs since rain, or 0 /~ 2 3
Water in channel --~ or growing season _~ ~'J
_ ~ __
16. Leaflitter 1,5 i 0.5 0
_
_
17. Sediment on plants or debris ~~~~~-
._... ---
--~---._--____.
--- --..v..-0 --~-
- .,
---- 0.5 1 A ___ _
1.5 ~~
.
~.._
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) -_____ ----__-- -------- -u_ _
-
0 0.5 ..---~
~: d 1.5

19. Hydrlc soils (redaximorphic features) present? _ .._.. .
No 0
Yes 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 5 - ~ 1
._._..__~-~_._..._... _.w _______.-..--
20 . Fibrous roots in channol
21 . Rooted plants in channei_____~ ~` _.__..._,__. _._.._
3
_ 3 _._ ----._~_. _.
2 __
__ 2 _ __
~ .__..__
1
_~~ 1
0
_ p _
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish
__~. _._.__._.__.__.._._._.__ _-. 0
~ 0.5 1 1.5

25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance)
~~_._~_____._~

0
-_ _.. -
0.5
0.5
..~__
_ __--
1
1 -_.__..._.._._._..w_.
1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton i _
.._.
~ _.. 2 ~-. __ 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29~. Wetland plants in streambed ~. FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0 ~
Hems cu ana z~ focus on the presence of upiana plants, nom za focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of ibis form for additional notes.)
- ~
_]_ t,
v
7~
l! 1
I
c,
-~~
,~

Narth Garaiina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 ~~-~'
date: !.~ T~ly .2djQ Project: ~O~eyCUtt tsfeevlwq latitude: ?5": ~ j,;"~
Evaluator: Gerald ~'o~t~ervt :site: J(,r16~N d' Durdil~ l.~c{ i.ongttuae: "18',.. (~! ~~.
Total Points: ~~1 f~,
Stream is at least intermittent ~ l ~ yl'" County: VU a k~. Og. Qued Name: ~~~a'f r' ~'i~t~"S~
!f Z 9 or arennia! if a 30
A. Geomor hold Subtotal =____~ _ _ Ahsent Weak ` .'.Moderate, Stroi>Eg',_`
10. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 __
2. Sinuosity ___ _ 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure riffle-pool sequence __ _---
4. Soil texture ar stream substrate sorting _ - -_0 -__
0 _ --_i _ -
1 -^m 2 ,~ _
_-_ -2
3 '
_ _
_ ____ _
5.-Active/relic floodplain _~ 0 1 _ 2 __ _ _
__ 3
__
_
6. Depositional bars or benc_hes_____ - ~
~ 0 1 2 _
3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8_Recent alluvia! deposits '~- -~ _ - _
9B Natural levoas _._-.------------- - ~ 0
0 _ 1
.=.-._.__ 1_....._ 2
2
_•_-_ 3
_---- 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 _
2 3
11. Grade controls
~ 0
~ 0.5
_____
~ _1_ 1,
__
~_ 12. _Natural valley or drainageway
.
-~0 -
_
0_5
_
__ ^1 _ __
,5
3. Second or greater order channel on existing
1
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~ may,(
Yes ~(~
yam`
"Man-mado ditches aro not ratad; seo discussions In manual
R Hvdminnv fSuhtotal = rr ~ }
_ 14, Groundwater flow/discharge - ~ mmmm_~ _ 0~ 1 T~
_ __~_.
-T' 2
~~ 3`
~~
15, Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 ~ 3
_ Water in channe~or growin~c _season __y,,.
______ ____ _ __ _
-
"
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0

17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 -•
1 -
1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack (inns) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Mydric soils (redoximorphic features present?M_ No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = ~~~•• O )
20'. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0

21 ,Rooted plants in channel W- -_...._-.__._...__~_.___
3 ._._ ...-. __.
__ 2
1
0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 ~~
_ 5
_-.- 1
._.~ _._.u_----
23. Bivalves .. ...
0 ..
1 ,_,~
2 ~
_
3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abunda_nco) _ 0 0. _ _
1 __ _ _
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _
~-~~~ 0 ___ 1 _ _
2 _T
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
~- 0 0.5 __
1 _ _
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0.5• FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
- Hems zo and zt locus on tme presence of upiano plants, uem za tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,
Sk~Ir.Fr
Notes: (use back side of this form for addiGona! notes.)
_- I'P_ ~~N~l.~_~ u~t~ alp ~.S' a7 dYru
~~~~

North Car~clina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identi#ication Farm; Version 3.1 ~~ ,~o'~"i',~~
Date: ~~ Dc:~risje~ o?~JDy Project: Noneycu~ fs~~~Nwa Latitude: 3,~'. yl ~S 5:32
Evaluator: ~eF-q~~ ~0't`'~',2YVl Site: j-fpy ~U~Cj- ~~`6~~~ Longitude: ''~~, ~~ rf `~
Total Points:
Stream is at least lntermiltent f , ! ~ Count Other i 1Q f ,~ f" ~ r
if Z 9 or erenniat !f a 30 `" ~ Y• ~~ ~e' e. g. Qued Name: f't/ I~ f~/~ N.

_A. Geomorphol~y _~Subtotal =_~_°l' ~ _ Abst:nt , '-.Weak ' Moderate:. ' ; :Stt-ong "- ::'
iB. Continuous bed and bank ___ 0 1 __ 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
_
3_ In-channel structure riffle-pool sequence _--
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sor#ing _____0-_~
0 -~
mm
mm~ _ _ 1__~_
~ 1
~ _-~~
_ _ 2 _ __ _ 3
__ _ 3 ~
5. Activo/relic floodplain 0
~. 1
~~ 2 3
_
6. Depositions! bars or benches
0
1
2 _
3
7. Braided channel _.-__-~
_._. .__._._...w____.___w..__~. 0
-.. - 1
_____.._-_..__ ~_2-----.-
_ .._ -----~ 3
__-.
B. Recent alluvial deposits
--.--.-.---_._......_...._..___...._..._.M._...._..__~.-._.._.---_____
9" Natural levees 0
.._____~. ._.__.-
0 1
-
- ~_. _.1 ____.. 2
----._..__._.._..._.__
2 3
._...__._. _.__._.
3
_--.---.---u._..___.._._..._._._.
10. Headcuts
.__.____._-_
.
...
... -~
__
..-_.-0 ___ _ _____ 2 _
3 _
-
_ _ __ _
..
.
..
11. Grade controls ~ 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5

13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRGS map or other documented
evidence.

No = 0 _ _

Yes
Man-made ditches are not rated; seo discussions In manual
R t-Ivrirnlnnv 1Suhtntal = l I} 1
- ._._._._.Y._.__._.._...._.._.....~._.-. ............_.__.
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ..._ ..................._.._._.__ ._.._.__-~_...._.._
0 1 _.__..._____....._._...
2 _._-.
3
_ _ _ __
^15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or~ __
0 ------ ~ -- _2-__. _.~ 3 W
__ _Water In chan_n__al -- dry orgrowin season
- _ _ ___
____ _
~
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0

17. 5odiment on plants or debris
0 0.5
~ _
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack lines) __ 0 __- 0.5 _ ._~
_-
_ 1 .5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? _____~ No 0 _ __ Yes X1,5 _ _-
C_ Binlnov fSubfotal W ~ I 1
20'. Fibrous roots In channel
i
t
d
l
t
l
21
R
h 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
0
anne
oo
e
p
an
s
.
n
c
_
_22, C_rayFish _ _ _~-.--- - 0 .._.
- -
- 0.5..
-
- ~ 1 -- 1.5 -.~` _
23, Bivalves ~Icu7A 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 _ 1.5
~
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrabe
nthos (note diversity a
nd abundance) _ ____ 0
- _ _0,5
ry~ 1 1.5
_
_
27. Filamentous algae; periphytan - 0 1 __
_
~~ 2 3
_ _ _
_
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. _
~... - __
0 ~ 0.5 1 _ _ __ 1.5
_._
~
29 etiW and plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL -- 1,5 SAV = 2,0; Other-
0
" (toms 20 and 21 focus on tho presence of upland plants, Itom 29 tocusos on the presence of aquatic or wolland plants.
Skwtrh•
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
~~'t'~~t~~tiaQ j~ ~l~' ~f wi''~~ • , a~tc'/ y
Ceti ~ . .Sl~4U~l~ ~ i~ ,J~>~1.~. , .
i~~ai~t ~iv~ l~tlf9,~yt: u~~ Cre~~
/ .~
f
1--_./
~'" ~a t ~
~'
~~
~~
,~
1
,/~
~~
~~-~~
_ r - S - .~ 3 i-d prn~ose~ ~~ ~ j

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream ldenti#ication Form; Version 3.1 ~'
Dat®: oZ~i ~~,~ ~~ ~} ~~ Project: f ~Ol?t?yCU~ CSYePNWa~ Latitude: ~',~ _ `~,~ 1 ~j
'~,~Evaluator: Gei-alc~ ~Po~erv~ .site: s~`~'O®~ .~ 4~. l~iV~i1 -2)°d ~. Longitude: '~ ~' • ~, ~ ~y
Total Points: ~,J J~ Qther J,
Stream fs at feast irrtermittent ~~, ~ Gounty: Vt/ a ICe. e.g. Quad tVame• UV ~~ ~~ ~ ~f~5~
if z 19 or erennia! !f a 30
A. Geomor~holo Subtotal.=__-' ~ __ Absent Weak Moderate ' Strong .
1", Continuous bed and bank 0
____.
-- 1
--- 2
- -~-- 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 __
3_ In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence __ _
Q. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~__ 0 ~
__ 0
~ _._____~ _.
1 _____ 2 _
2" ___ __ 3 __
_ 3_
-
~~
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3
_
6. Depositional bars or benches- - _____. _
_ _ 0 _ __ _
__~~~
~ 2 _
__ _
3
7. Braided channel
--._____.__ 0
w__... 1
._-. 2
____._._.-____.. 3
~_~_____.__
._._.._..._--
8. Recont alluvial de osits
_. _..._.-.___..___..___....._p -_.-. ------._...__-.--
9" Natural leveos . _.._
----.._.._.. _....
0 . _._ .._.~_. _._._._._
... _.....
1 .._..........___.? ._.____

2 -_ 3
___._
3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls ____ _~
12. Natural valley ar drainagewa
y ._..._~___._. 0
0

.. _
......__ 0.5
0.5

___._..___.._.. 1
Y 1

.-.__...__.._.. _._....._ - 1.,5
1.5 _

_W._...
_....._._ ._._ .~.-_---
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
Yes T 3
° Man-mado ditches are not rated; see discussions to manual
R Wvrtrnlnnv (Siihfntal W ~~ ~ S
14. Groundwater flow/discharge~~~-.- ~ ~ ~~ 0... W_- 1~_ __ 2 ______ _ __ 3
-
-
_ 15. Water in channel and > Q8 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2
~ ~
J
t
_ Water in channel -- dry orgrowing season
16. Leaflilter
1.5
~
1
_. ~ ,___
,
0.5 0
17. Sediment an plants or debris ~~ 0 0.5 v 1 - 1.5 v

18. rgan c e r s n
_. ~_._.._._....___. _..m.___.__ _..._..._.__
19. Hydric soils (redoxs ar pilos (Wrack linos) ___.._ .......
__ _ _ imorphic features) present? ........ ......~.."__.____.._.

No .__.._._._... 0.5
_ ......................

- 0 1 1.5
.._...__..._._........._......_..._....... __ _._

Yes 1.5
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = ~Q•~ 1
20 Fibrous roots in channel ~ t 3 ^ ~~ 1 - ~ 0
s_.....------
21 .Rooted plants In channel
_
._.
3
.
.
2
1
0
T
__._.__.... ._..._._..._....-.________.._.._..__.__.._..___.__
.
22. Crayfish .._.

0 _._._....-__._______

0.5 __... _

1 _
._.---
1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5

25. Amphibians
0
0.5 __. _.._
1 _ -
1.5
26. Macrobenthos {note diversity and a_ bundance) 0 _ 0.5 1 1.5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1
2 _
3
_ ____
28, iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus, T 0~ _
__
0.5 _______
__
_.__
1
.
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other.
" Itoms 20 and 21 focus on tho presence of upland plants, Ilom 29 focusos an the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. ""
Notos: {use back sldo of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
.:
___ ~> ei~l i~ I a.~ ...5~~~ ow l/t old ~5~ ~~~~ i~! r~f~ ~, ~ ~ S - ~ 5
i'
~ ~~vtc.(

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Farm; Version 3.1 ~; _ ~~"
Date: c?Z~ ~~ ~ ~ t~(]~
'~, Evaluator: Gr~C"Alc~ ~O~~rv>
Total Points:
Stream Is at least lntemrlttent ~ _
if ~ 9 or erennial if ~ 30
Project: ~Ol?PyCUI ~ t~j',ePI1Wa
Site: ~~de~f~ 0:~ ~:''AUi'N ~'tdy
County: ~~ ~~
Latitude: ~ ~; ~ ~ ~~ ()
Longitude: '~~ .. ~ f ~y ,~
Other (/~~~ ~ ~j((i`1~
e. g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hology (Subtotal =,.~~_~ ___) 'Absent ':.'.Weak ; "Moderate ' ~Strorig
~
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
_
3. {n-channe! structure: riffle-pool sequence ~
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting __~_ 0
_ _ 0 _ - _
1
_ ~mm 1 _-__ _ _ 2
_ 2 ~
` 3
-, 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 _ 1 2 3 _
_
_
6. Depositional bars or benches
_ . _ _ __ 0
~ _- - 1 _ 2
-
- 3 __
mm
7. Braided channel
.
. 0
_ 1 2
~-._..__r. 3
__....
.
.
~.,~
_. -~.._._.. __._.. ._..
8. Recent alluvial deposits_ _ __
_. ._.__-_.~.--- - _. _ -__ __...._ _---------------
9° Natural levees _
0
----._ ______
0 1
------ ~-- --_ ..._..._...
1 2
....-._...._ - _.__..._ ___ _
2 _..-._.
3
~.....-T_._...
3
_
10. Headcuts ~_ ___.__~~
11. Grade controls-------_--- -------- __
- 00 ---
--_-~ ~
-- 0.5 -~ 2 ~
_____ -~-- _~~~ 3mm~µ-V _
--~~ 1.5
--
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0,5 1 1,5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No 0
Yes = 3
"Man-mado ditchos ar© not rated; see diyys~~cussions In manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Suhtntal = I ~ V 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or (~
`;J 1 2 3
Water In channel _- dry.or growln~ season
Leaflitter
16
1
5
1 _~. __
0
5 0
.
17. Sediment on plants or debris .
0
.
- 0.5
. .
1 1.5
_._.,..._._._w._~-...-__. -~--~--__w..
lines or piles (Wrack lines)
_
18: Organic debris .._..-
_.
___ ._ 0 _ _ ~- -
_ 0,5 ------- -.,.___-._.
1 1.5
_
_
19. Hydric_soils {redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C_ Bioloav lSubtofal = <~• ~ 1

- ,r----- ----
2D , ~IbrouS roots in channel
21 ,Rooted plants in channel

3
~ 3

2
2

1
1 -----

0
0
_ 22. Crayfish Y ---
23. Bivalves --------------_.._.___.____._______.__ 0
__ 0 _._
_ -~- 0,5
____. 1 --__
- 1
-_ 2 -.---_
~ 1.5
_..__ ~ _
_
24, Fish ~~~~~~-_ ~-
._.__._._......___.._
.~
___
..__ 0,5
.-.-- 1
___-- 1.5 __
.
25. Amphibians_ -___._.______.-.---
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
---~--_~- ---_-~-- 0
0
- ___ •J--- 0.5
0.5
~_-
-~~ f _._.._._
1
~_-_-~_ ___ 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
-
~ 1 2
~ 3 --
____
28. iron oxidizing bacterialfungus.
_ 0 0.5 1 ____
1.5 _._.
_
29 . Wetland plants In streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Itom 29 focusos on tt~e presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch: r~
Notos: (uso back sldo of this (orm for addilionaE notes.)
~-.. y..~ctt`~f~ ,__s l~ acts yt ovt So i ~ !%na~- --._-__._

North Caeolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 CJ°._ ~~
Date: ~~ UC.~~ r~~l a
Evaluator. Gera~~ ~0'~fl'Vl
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ~• O
if ~ 9 or orennlal !f Z 30
Project: NONPyCU~'I' (St"ePYtWa
site: ~ SO(?' ,~ ~'`f IC'aVes7 J~'%d9~
County: Vl/ a ~~
Latitude: ~ ,~ „ ~~
Longitude: `7~'' ~ ~ j
Other ~.^ f~
e.g. Quad Nama: ~'t t~Y ' ~~~
A. Geomor hoiO~~Subtatal ~_ 5.0 __) ~ Absent
~~ Weak" ',Moderate Strong':.'
1°. Continuous bed and bank ~_~ , 0 ~~~~ 2 3
2. Sinuosity _ __ _
Y _ _ 1
~ 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 4 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
____.. 0
____. 2 3

5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1 _
2 _
3
6. Qepositional bars_or benches_
_ ~ _ 1 2 3
7. Braided channel
~~ ~~~ _~_- -_--- --
____
--- 1
_~.
_ _
2 _. ____
3
8. Recent alluvial deposlis
9 B Natural levees 0
0 _ 1..
_-----
1 2
2 3 --~
3

10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
0
0
1
0.5
2 _
3~
1.5

12. Natural valley or dralnageway
d
0.5 _
1 _
1
.
5 -

13. Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. _

No ~0 _ _
_
__
_
_ _
~~ _-~~ ~~~""- ~~
Yes = 3
- Man•matl0 tlltchos are not rates; see tl15CU5slon5 in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = l•~ 1
14. Groundwater flawldischarge _ ~
1 ~ 2 3

15.1Nater in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _ _
d ___ _
_
1 _ ____ __
2 _
_
3 _.__
Water in channe~~~or gro_ wing_season _•___~._
16
Laaflitter 1
5 1 ~
0
5 0

.
17. Sediment on plants or debris
.
_
0
_
0.5 ___. T~.MA.T~~.~v.._.. _..
.
1 ______
_._
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack linos} _ ~0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No 0 Yes = 1. 5
G. Bioloav (Subtotal = .~• ~ 1
20~'. Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1 ~
1 0
0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves
------_...._.__ w___.._..._...._....__._._-- 0
-..._... 1 2 3

24. Fish _ _____ _
____
_ 0 .---.--.._.._...
0.5 ___-_..--~
1 ~_._____
1.5

25. Amphibians
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)_
~ _
^ 0

_ __
__
0.5
0.5 _
__
~ ~1
1 _
~ 1.5 u
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton _
_
T~ 0
~- ~~~
_-~ __
~ 1 - ___
_ __
2 ___
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
~~ __ 0 ~
~ •~~ 0.5 _ 1
~
- _
--~--~ 1.5~
29 . Wetland plants in streambed _
_
FAC = 0,5_ FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 5AV = 2.0; Other
nerns cu ana cr rocus on cne prasonce or upiana prams, aem za Focuses on me presence or aquatic or wetlantl plants.
Sketch:
tJotes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
rv~e~ , -_____
~~~= J

North Catalina Division of Water Quality -- Stream identification Form; Version 3.1 5 - ~'~
bate: 26 D t.T 2Q ~ Protect: NOV1PyCU~f ~Sr2PYIWQ Latitude: ~ S'r yo~ j `?'
Evaluator: ~e~-a~c~ ~Po~~t'v~ ,site: ~,'7~0~ ~,S c,~ ~Vry~j~j~ e Longitude: '~'~'„ ~G~~c~
Total Points: Other
Stream fs at /east fntermiftanf ~ Q O County: ~~ ~~ e.g. Quad Name: ~~~ ~~'~
if z 19 or erennia! if a 30 "
A. Geomor itol ~ subtotal =,~ ~~ ~ _ _Z- _ Absent ~
~ - Weak; ' MaderaEe Strsrig
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity _ __ ______ 1 __
2 ~ 3
_3. in-cannel structure: riffle-pool sequence ___ __ _
- ~ _ __ 0 ____ __ 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting __ _ __ 0 1 T~ _ _ __
~~ 2 _
~~ 3
_5. Activv/relic fl_oodpfain__ _ _
___._.._____v___. 0
____
__.~_ 1
___.__.. _
2 3
6, Depositional bars or benc_hvs
~ ~ 0 1 - - 2 3

_7. Braided channel
~_..______~__
0
___
.
1
_
. _
~ 2 _
_
~ 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 ° Natural louses 0
_ .___
_.;
1 1 _
2 _ ._.__3.___
3
10. tieadcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainage_way_ 0
0 0.
0.5 1
_ _ __ 1 ____
~ { ~' ~ ~ 1.5
1.5
~~ M
13. Second or greater order channel on existina
USGS or NRCS snap or other documented
evidenco. No ~0,~ Yes = 3
nnan-maae ancnas are not rates; seo aiscussions in manua~
B.Hvdroloav !Subtotal= ~~~~ )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge _ _ _ 0 __ __
_
v _ 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or _ 0 ^ 1 _
_____ 2 _ .._. 3
Wator In channel _~ or~rowin~season _~
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 t'0~

17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 ~
1.5

18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines}
---__.__-..._...._.._.------_.W_.._.._...._.....---------~---~_.._..._.

..._
0
._..__.___..._-....._....._ .
0,5
..... _ ._
1
. _... _
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} .present? _ - - No 0 .. Yes = 1.5
C. Biolaav (Subtotal = ~•~ l
_.._. .-_
-_v ._~
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
----.-__._.._.___..-.---_.._....__._._._.w____.
21 . Rooted plants in channel
___ ._._---.---._._.._.__.__.._-.._._.._..._.__._.___..

3
.~.----.----__.-
3
__._....._. _..-

2
.---_.__..______
2
-_-
_

-.._..-.
----....~
0

0

22, Crayfish
-~---

.._
---- _
. r._
0.5 _..._.. -.
1 _.~ __
1.5
23. Bivalves ._.
0 _- ~- -__-2 _.__ ..- 3 ___._.
24. Fis_h_ _
-
- 0
-v 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
_ _
26. MacrobenthoS note diversity a_nd abundance} -
~ `- 0
_ 0 0.5 -
0.5 r_M_. ~--.._..._._-
9 - 1.5
1,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ~
__ 0
_ -
_
1 ___
2 3 ~--
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 ~
0.5 __
1 - 1.5
__
29 .Wetland plants in streambed -~ _
_
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OSL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
nerns cu aria ~ i locus on mo presence or up~ana plants, iFem ca rocuses on [ne presence or aquatic or Wetlantl plants.
SkAtnh•
Not©s: (use back sido of this form for additional notes.)
_ ~E'1~1?E'i7'l~./?c,[~ NU`~ yy1~ ~~~{~~S or •-
r
e

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-~ Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 S - 5~
- --
bate: „'Z ~ 0 c,~ 2G~ ~ tProject: f {o~tPycu~!- Csr,e~vrwd Laclt~r~e: ..3.5 ~ ~a..~6
Evaluator: ~~,{-q j~ ~p'~t1'y1 Stte: ~ ~~! ~ ;,•j~ ~Aye?iR ~jc~~ Longitude: "18„ ~ p $ „~
Total Points: Other (~ j ,
Stream is at least intermittent r ~~ (~ County: ~~ ~~ Q.g. Quad Name: V U ~ ~~ ~~~
!f z 9 or erenniai if z 30

A. Geamor holo Subtotal =____ °__,~ _ -,
Absent ; : -~
Weak
` Moderate-- '
~
.Strong `. `!
1g. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 _ 2 3

2. Sinuosity
0 __
-
_ 1 __
u
2 _
3

3. !n-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1
2 - _
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ___ ___ 0 _ _ 1 2
~ 3
5. Active/relic floodplain_ _ _ ___
u ___0 ___ 1 __ _
_ ~ 2-- 3
6, Depositional bars or benches
~ 0 1 _
-2
--~ 3
7. Braided channef___
___ __ 0 __ 1
~ _ ~ - - ----__ 3 _
8. Recent alluvial deposits
.._.______.__._. __~ _---.---------•-.-._--
--_--. -._ 1
- ~--2
_
_
.__._
..
.. 3

9 s Natural levees
-__..______._._._.__~---_--._..~___.
0
..._....._
..,_._
1
_-._-__
----._ T.
.
..
_
_..._..
2
_-- ____..-_.~._-~.._....
3
10. Headcuts 0 ~ 2 3 ---
11. _Grade_controis
--- 0
_- 0.5
--- 1
- 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0,5 - -_.__._1___.._- -... 1.5 __
13. Second or greater order channel on existinct
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
Yes = 3
'-Man-made dilcnas aro not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdrolnav (Subtotal = !~~ 1
14. Groundwater Flow/discharge ____ 1
0 ~ - 2
-
3
-.-_-.__ ___
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or ~ ____
__ ____
_
-r1 ~ ~1 _
__
__
_
2 ~3
Water in channel _ dr~orgrowin~ season ~
-
~~ -~_- -~- -- _ ___ __ __ -
--
~
- -_ - _
~- ~_
16. Leaflitker 1.5
1 0.5 0
- _~.-. _W._...-.._
17. Sediment on plants or debris .__.__ - _
0.5 -..-.______.__._.-.._._-. ._......._._
1 1.5
18. Organic debris linos or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19_Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?- No 0 Yes =1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~~ ~ 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
3 2
2 1
1 0
0
22. Crayfish-
-----.-~.___. _ 0
___._...
_-~_ 0.5
-- 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 ~ ----- ---2 ---- ---3 __
24. Fish _
--
__
-°__ 0.5
_ 1 1.5
25. Amphibians
26. Macro_benthos {note divorsily and a_bundancc}
-
_ 0 _
0.5
0.5 ---- f -----
1 ----1.5-------
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphy#on
__ __
--~~
~ 1 - _.- 2~ - 3
_
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 _
0.5 -!~!_
-1 ~_1.5
29~. Wetland plants in sfreambed _
___
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other
Hems zu ano n rocus on me presence or upiano pian[s, Hem za rocuses on tno presence or aquatic or wetlano pian~~ G M
Sketch: 1 ~~.~ ~""~,_
Notes: (use back sido of this form for additional notes.)
-.__-G7-~.~~.~~s1~r~. ~ s r~ Gil of I ~r~d

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 -~'- „S
Date: ~~ ~Gr ~p p Project: J~OYTeyCU7~ Csr~~NWR t,atftude: ~ ~ _ 9a3 ~`J
Evaluator: Gerar<c~ I~o~terc~ site: ~ 1 qQa' s' ~f ~~v~~, ~~ Longitude: g~ ~ pg
Tote! Paints: Other
Stream is at least lntamtittent 90' /~ County: f ~ f ~ ~~ ~(~~ ~ r~ t
if a 9 or erennia! !f z 30 fX V rv e.g. Quad fVame:
f
A. Geomorphology (subtotal =__ 1 y' ~ _) '' :Absent Weak ".Moderate ;Strong

18. Continuous bed and bank
0
-
1 __
3
2. Sinuosity __ ___ 0
_ 1---~ _w 2 3
3. In-_channel structure: riffle-pool sequonce_____ _ 0
~ 1
Y 2 3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate s__o_rting _
-- -~ _ _
_
0 __
~
- ____
_
- _ _
_____ __ _
__
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 _
1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
----•-----___._.-- 0
_ 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0
-- _-____~__.w._..-- _ 2 -
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9" Natural levees ___
"" _. ._._. 0
0~
_._ 1
1 -`2 -~~_
2 _
___ 3
3
10. Headculs 0 __ ~___._. _._ 2 _-.- __.- 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5

12. Natural valley or drainageway
0 _
0.5
~1~ _
_
____ 1.5
13. Second or greater order channe( on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. '
No ~
Yes = 3
n~an-mane ancnes are no[ ra[oa; see arscussrons rn manual
B. Hvdroloa~ fSuhtnta! = ~' ~ )
_ 14. Groundwater flowldis_charge~Y_~ ~ 0 _ 1 _
____ _ 2
~ 3
15. Water in channel and ~ 48 hrs since rain, or
_ Water In channel --dry or rowin season ~_
~~..~ ln`1
_ __ ll__JJ _ 1

_
~•--~~,....~_.~. 2
_
.._.._._
---~

.M.-~- 3

.-
16. Leaflitter 1,5 `7J 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack Imes) _ 0 _ 0.5 1' 1.5
-19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = _~i . d )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
__ _u _.~._.____......._---._.-...----._.__..__-----._..._.._____._.._.._._--
21 . Rooted plants in channel -_ 3
_.__......_.._..._.._...._..__.....
3 2
__...~._._ _-._.
2 1 ~
....__
1 p - --

0
_22_ Crayfish---------------•--_._...--.-. _.___._---
23. Bivalves -- --- - 0.5
1 -_-- 1
__-._..2_.._u _
1.5
-_ 3 ___
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians __- ~_ - ~__
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity a_nd abundance)
~--__._.___-____ _ 0
0 ~
__.__ 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
- .-_-1 _....- _ 2 _ 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 -0.5 --
1 a 1.5
__
29 . Wetland plants in streambed - T - _
_
FAC = 0.5; FACW T 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
rtoura au gnu ~ r wcus vn ura prusvrwd ur upiena prams, nam ,ca rocuses on azo presence or aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch; ~~ ~L
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) M

~-- ~ -3y
e
~~

North Carallna Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1 ~~~
Date: ~~, ~Cl ~,(~~ ~ Project: NOYtPyCU~t ~Sf~'P41Wa t.atitudo: ~ S- ~o~,~~
Evaluator: Gerald Pa~tervl Site; IO ~~,5 p.~k~vP~~'i~ ~ Longitude: rr8'' ~0$I
Total Points: ether ~•~••
Stream is at least lntermittertt ~~v 5 County: YV a ~'e, e.g. Quad Name: ~t,~a~ ~d('S(~•'
if a 9 or erenrriai if Z 3D
A. Geamaphology (subtotal =__-~`~^~%_ Absent Weak.. ':Moderate •: Strpng ": ; .
1a. Continuous bed and bank __ 0
____... 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity _ 0 _
1 ~ - 2 ~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 'I _ __
2 _
3
4. Soli texture_or stream__s_ubstrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches _
0 _
0 __
- 1~ _
2 _
~ - 3 _
W-~3 "-
-
7. Braided channel __
0~ -
1 2 3
_....._..__..__...__- w.
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9° Natural levees --
__..-._.
0
0 -
___
1
1 -
2
2
3
3

10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
0
0
1
0. -.
2
1 _
3
1.5

12. Natural valley or drainagoway _ ___
-
-
~
-0 _--
O_5
i _
1.5
13.
Second or greater
order channel on existinn
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. TT
_
No ~ -_-_
Yes = 3
Man-mao0 gllCneS ar0 not raise; seeddiscusskons to manual
R. Hvrirntnnv lSuhtntal = DA~ 1
_ i4. Groundwater flowldischarge ___ _ __
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, -or-~
Water In
r
h
nel
dr
or
i 0 1
-~----~-0 - _-_._.~___...._._ 2 3
2 _.._ ~ _,_._~
_
c
an
-w
y
g
ng season
ow
-.___ _. ..._.....
-- -
-
18. Leaflitter - ~~--_.-.
1.5 ...__
- 0.5 ---• ~•
u~- w
- ~
- .
_
-
17 Sediment on plants or debris
~~ ___
0
_
0.5
- rv
- 1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles {Wrack lines) 0
0.5 - _
- ~-1 ^1.5

19. Mydric soils (redoximor~hic features present?
__ No = 0 -~ -_- __
-_ Yes 1.5 _~-
C. Bioloov fSubtotaE ~ ~ • ~ 1
--r; ----
20 ,Fibrous roots in channel
21 . Rooted plants in channel
-~.__~__-- -..._._-._-..-..._.
3
3
__.___._ .~_._.
2
2
__...._.__ _......__......_
1
1
_r.__
0
0

22. Crayfish
0.5
1 _ ._.
1.5
23. Bivalves ____~_..._._----___-_._ -.... 0 ._ 1 2 3

24. Fish .._._.---_..._._ _--._.
___._. _. --
__._ 0.5 _._--
- 1 __
._ _
^ 1.5
25_ Amphibians -.----------,....__._._..._._.._.._._-_..._.__._....__.--
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and_abundance)
- --..__.__ ~..----
0 ...._.__ 0.5 _ _ _
0.5 _ _ _ 1
1 1.5
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
_ - _~_ 0 ___
_
1 _
2 ____
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria!(ungus_ 0 --
_-
0.5 1 1.5
_---
29~Wetland plants in streambed _
_
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Hems cu ano c ~ Focus on my presence or upianc plants, Hem za rocuses on one presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes; (use back side of this form for additional notes,)
•~:~~r~,-v~r`~i~f S=f i~°avr~ ~ 1-f~i~`h G~Pt la i~ cf G'M a ~ ~~`` ~.
~ P~ r~ ~~Sf~ S ~
S~-~1O
e ~'
r
l

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Forrn; Version 3.1 ~S - ~~
Date: ~~ ~ ~'i" ,~ ~ ~~ Project: NOhPs/CUtt U f E~PHWQ Latitude: ~ j S'", ~~ {~ 6
Evaluator: GCj-a~~ ~p'~'tfryl Site: ~'Q~ ~s' ~ f ~~I~~G Longitude: ~'~„ 6~rr~ .
Total Points:
Stream Js at least intermittent ~~,Q County: ~,~ l Other 1 ja~~ f~
if z 9 ar erennfal !f Z 30 rV ~ ~e' e•9. Quad Name: W t
A. Geomor halogy (subtotal =___`~~~ ~~ -__ Absent __Weak__
~ 'Moderate: `: ;Strong'
1 °. Continuous bed and bank
~~ 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity 0
___._ 1 ~
2 - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ___
~~ _____ 0 _ __ _
_~___1 ~
2 -
3

4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting _
_
1~~ __
____
- 2 __
__... - 3 -
5. Active/relic floodplain ___ _
~ ~ __ 1 2
~~~ 3
_6. Depositional bars or benches _
~ ______
_
1 ~ _
2 3
7. Braided channel __
-.~~-----------
~
~ 1 --
-~-- ~~2 ~--- 3 y-
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 sNatural levees 0 - ~ -.-_..--
1 ------ 2~
2 3 --
3
10. Headcuts _ _ _ ___ _
- -__._ 0 1 2 3

11, Grade controls _
0 _
~ 0.5 _ _
___
1.5 --
12. Natural valley or drainageway
- 0 0.5 1 1.5
13.
Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. '
No ~0 __
_ _
~ _-- ~`~~~- ~-
Yes = 3
"Man-matle tlitches are not rated; soo discussions in manual
B. Wvdrolaav (Subtotal = ~e~ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discllargo 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2

_~. Water in channel or growing season
. 3

-_-
16. Leaflitter ._...____---
-
- -.....-__,1.5 ---- --_____ 1.-_._._

_... -~ -• -- ---- _
...___-_0.5 ~ 0

-..T.._..-_ -
~
._

17. Sediment on plants or debris __~ ____
~ _ 0 0.5 _
- --~- ---
1 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
.
- __
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) prasent? ~ No 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov fSubtotai = ~ ~ 1
_.. ._......_....__-...._..._~._ _.._.w..
20T' Fibrous roots in channel
21 ,Rooted plants in channel
_W_._..___-- --~ ._._._.-..._.-._.___._..__._-. ...~... _-
3
3
--______. ___
.
. __. __._----..._
2
2 .----~-
1
1
0
0

22. Crayfish ~,~ ~_.!-_~_-
y
_ .
_
M.
__
-
- -_-_ _.._~__
0.5 ..-._._-_.__
1 _~._-.___.
1.5
23~Bivafvos
-------__.~_._____ _w.____.....__..___...- _.,_
0
-- --- __
_
~--1
._ - 2 -- 3.-.___

24. Fish _.__.___ ____-- _--- -__.__._____.. __
0.5 .___..._._.___.-._.
1
1.5
_25ryAmphfblans ._^-.~-.~_~__....__..__....._..__
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) _
-
- 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
_ 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
_
_ _
0 _
~ ~ 1 -~ 2 - _ _
v
3

28. iron oxidizing bacterra/fungus.
0 ~
0.5~
~~ 1 _
_
____ 1.5
29 Wetland plants in streambed - ~ FAG = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
nnms cv anu c~ cocus on me prosonce or upiana plants, nem is rocuses on me presaneo of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
____-~~Y~~era-~ c vrn,e(~ cjf i~~~'c~ fir ~--__... ,
C~~s dr~_ Sot` ur -~C
S~yl