NC0073393_Permit (Issuance)_20201207

FACT SHEET FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS
This form must be completed by Permit Writers for all expedited permits which do not require
full Fact Sheets. Expedited permits are generally simple 100% domestics (e.g., schools, mobile
home parks, etc) that can be administratively renewed with minor changes, but can include
facilities with more complex issues (Special Conditions, 303(d) listed water, toxicity testing,
instream monitoring, compliance concerns).
Basic Information for Expedited Permit Renewals
Permit Writer / Date
Brianna Young 12/7/2020
Permit Number
NCO073393
Facility Name / Facility Class
Dana Hill WWTP / WW-2
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
French Broad / 04-03-02
Receiving Stream / HUC
UT to Devils Fork / 060101050301
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
C / 6-55-8-2
Does permit need Daily Maximum NH3
limits?
Already present
Does permit need TRC limits/language?
Alread resent
Does permit have toxicity testing? IWC (%) if
so
N/A
Does permit have Special Conditions?
No
Does permit have instream monitoring?
No
Is the stream impaired on 303 d list)?
Yes - benthos
Any obvious compliance concerns?
Yes See Section 2 below
Any permit mods since lastpermit?
None
New expiration date
11/30/2025
Comments on Draft Permit?
None
Section 1. Facility Overview:
The Dana Hill Corporation operates a WWTP with a permitted discharge of 0.030 MGD.
Per WLAs performed in 1988, 1993, and 1995, the UT to Devils Fork has positive flow.
The facility treats 100% domestic wastewater for 146 mobile homes which serves 215
people. The facility generates a continuous discharge. Treatment technology includes:
influent lift station with dual pumps and high water alarm, flow equalization basin with
manual bar screen and flow splitter box, dual (20,000 and 10,000 gallon) aeration basins,
dual hoppered clarifiers with airlift skimmers and sludge return, aerobic digestor, tablet
chlorination, chlorine contact chamber, tablet dechlorination, dechlorination chamber,
post aeration chamber, ultrasonic flow meter, and effluent composite sampler.
Section 2. Compliance History (October 2015 — October 2020):
• 1 NOD for BOD daily max exceedance
• 3 CPAs for BOD daily max exceedances
• 1 CPA for BOD monthly avg exceedances
• 1 NOV for ammonia nitrogen monthly avg exceedances
• 1 CPA for ammonia nitrogen daily max exceedances
Page 1 of 8

• 2 CPAs for ammonia nitrogen monthly avg exceedances
• 1 CPA for fecal coliform daily max exceeded
• 2 CPAs for TSS daily max exceedances
• 1 CPA for TSS monthly avg exceedances
• 4 CPAs for BOD frequency violations
• 1 NOV for TRC frequency violation
• 1 CPA for frequency violation
• 4 CPAs for fecal coliform frequency violations
• 1 CPA for ammonia nitrogen frequency violation
• 1 CPA for pH frequency violation
• 4 CPAs for TSS frequency violations
• 1 CPA for temperature frequency violation
• 1 CPA for late/missing DMR
303(d) listing:
•55.8-2b (Devils Fork
From first unnamed trihutarywest of State Route 1006 to Johnson Drainage Ditch
Classification � Length or Area 3 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest Category
Exceeding Criteria Poor Renthos(N rr,At, FW)
Ammonia nitrogen evaluation:
Per 15A NCAC 02B .0404(c), winter limits shall not be more than 2 times those of
summer limits. The current permit contains ammonia nitrogen limits for winter
(November 1 — March 31) that are greater than 2 times those for summer (April 1 —
October 31). A review of discharge monitoring data from November 2015 to March 2020
shows that the permittee will be able to meet stricter limits in winter a majority of the
time. As such, the ammonia nitrogen limits for winter will be reduced per 15A NCAC
02B .0404(c).
Winter ammonia nitrogen data from November 1, 2015 through March 31, 2020:
• Maximum daily value = 21 mg/L
• Minimum daily value = < 0.1 mg/L
• Average daily value = 2.04 mg/L
Current hermit limits:
Monthly Avg
Daily Max
NH3 as N C0610
(April 1 - October 31
4.4 mg/L
22 mg/L
NH3 as N C0610
November 1 - March 31
12.0 mg/L
35.0 mg/L
Page 2 of 8

Pro osed permit limits:
Monthly Avg
Daily Max
NH3 as N CO610
(April 1 -October 31)
4.4 mg/L
22 mg/L
NH3 as N CO610
(November 1 - March 31)
8.8 mg/L
35.0 mg/L
Section 3. Changes from previous permit to draft:
• Updated eDMR footnote in A(1) and language in A(2)
• Updated outfall map
• Added facility grade in A(1)
• Updated receiving stream information on the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet
• Updated winter ammonia limits in A(1) per 15A NCAC 02B .0404(c)
Section 4. Changes from draft to final:
• eDMR language updated in A(2)
Section 5. Comments received on draft permit:
• None
Page 3 of 8

NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards - Freshwater
Standards
The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard (WQS) Triennial Review was approved by
the NC Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The
US EPA subsequently approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016, with some
exceptions. Therefore, metal limits in draft permits out to public notice after April 6,
2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards - as approved.
Table 1. NC Dissolved Metals Water Quality Standards/Aquatic Life Protection
Parameter
Acute FW, µg/l
(Dissolved)
Chronic FW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Acute SW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic SW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Arsenic
340
150
69
36
Beryllium
65
6.5
---
---
Cadmium
Calculation
Calculation
40
8.8
Chromium III
Calculation
Calculation
---
---
Chromium VI
16
11
1100
50
Copper
Calculation
Calculation
4.8
3.1
Lead
Calculation
Calculation
210
8.1
Nickel
Calculation
Calculation
74
8.2
Silver
Calculation
0.06
1.9
0.1
Zinc
Calculation
Calculation
90
81
Table 1 Notes:
1. FW= Freshwater, SW= Saltwater
2. Calculation = Hardness dependent standard
3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form.
Aquatic life standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total
Recoverable Metals due to bioaccumulative concerns (as are all human health
standards for all metals). It is still necessary to evaluate total recoverable aquatic
life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC 213.0200 (e.g., arsenic at 10
µg/1 for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at 1.8 mg/L for
aquatic life protection).
Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness -Dependent Metals
The Water Effects Ratio (WER) is equal to one unless determined otherwise
under 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph (11)(d)
Metal
NC Dissolved Standard, /1
Cadmium, Acute
WER* 11. 136672-[ln hardness] (0.04183 8)1 e^{0.9151 [In hardness]-3.14851
Cadmium, Acute Trout waters
WER* {1. 136672-[ln hardness] (0.041838)} e^{0.9151[ln hardness]-3.6236}
Cadmium, Chronic
WER*{1.101672-[1n hardness] (0.041838)} e^{0.7998[ln hardness]-4.4451}
Chromium III, Acute
WER*0.316 e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+3.72561
Chromium III, Chronic
WER*0.860 e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+0.68481
Page 4 of 8

Copper, Acute
WER*0.960 e^{0.9422[ln hardness]-1.7001
Copper, Chronic
WER*0.960 e^{0.8545[ln hardness]-1.7021
Lead, Acute
WER*{1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • e^{1.273[ln hardness]-1.4601
Lead, Chronic
WER*11.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • ell {1.273[In hardness]-4.705}
Nickel, Acute
WER*0.998 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+2.2551
Nickel, Chronic
WER*0.997 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+0.05841
Silver, Acute
WER*0.85 • e^{1.72[ln hardness]-6.591
Silver, Chronic
Not applicable
Zinc, Acute
WER*0.978 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
Zinc, Chronic
WER*0.986 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards.
However, application of the dissolved and hardness -dependent standards requires
additional consideration in order to establish the numeric standard for each metal of
concern of each individual discharge.
The hardness -based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream
(upstream) hardness and so must be calculated case -by -case for each discharge.
Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR
122.45(c). The discharge -specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total
values for use in the RPA calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values
developed for each metal (more on that below), but it is also possible to consider case -
specific translators developed in accordance with established methodology.
RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness -Dependent Metals - Freshwater
The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each
metal of concern, based on recent effluent data, and calculate the allowable effluent
concentrations, based on applicable standards and the critical low -flow values for the
receiving stream.
If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or
acute), the discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard, which warrants a
permit limit in most cases. If monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the
pollutant is not present (i.e. consistently below detection level), then the Division may
remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit.
1. To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness -dependent metals the Permit
Writer compiles the following information:
Page 5 of 8

• Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q10 (the spreadsheet
automatically calculates the 1 Q 10 using the formula 1 Q 10 = 0.843
(s7Q I0, CfS) 0.993
• Effluent hardness and upstream hardness, site -specific data is preferred
• Permitted flow
• Receiving stream classification
2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness -dependent metal of
concern and for each individual discharge, the Permit Writer must first determine
what effluent and instream (upstream) hardness values to use in the equations.
The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test
results for any hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional
data is available for instream hardness values, upstream of the discharge.
If no hardness data is available, the permit writer may choose to do an initial
evaluation using a default hardness of 25 mg/L (CaCO3 or (Ca + Mg)).
Minimum and maximum limits on the hardness value used for water quality
calculations are 25 mg/L, and 400 mg/L, respectively.
If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness -dependent metal
showing reasonable potential, the permit writer contacts the Permittee and
requests 5 site -specific effluent and upstream hardness samples over a period of
one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data.
The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as
follows:
Combined Hardness (chronic)
_ (Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness, mg/L) x (s7Q10, cfs *Avg. Upstream
Hardness, m_/g_L)
(Permitted Flow, cfs + s7Q 10, cfs)
The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the IQ 10
flow.
3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a
total recoverable metal, using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients (DPCs) or
site -specific translators, if any have been developed using federally approved
methodology.
Page 6 of 8

EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved" converts the
value for dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal
at in -stream ambient conditions. This factor is calculated using the linear
partition coefficients found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for
Calculating a Total Recoverable Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion
(EPA 823-B-96-007, June 1996) and the equation:
Cdiss = I
Ctotal I + { [Kpo] [SS(I+a)] [10-6] }
Where:
ss = in -stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1], minimum of 10 mg/L
used, and
Kpo and a = constants that express the equilibrium relationship between
dissolved and adsorbed forms of metals. A list of constants used for each
hardness -dependent metal can also be found in the RPA program under a
4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition
coefficient (or site -specific translator) to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at
ambient conditions.
In some cases, where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist
(ie. silver), the dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by
the EPA conversion factor to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient
conditions. This method presumes that the metal is dissolved to the same extent as
it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more information on
conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document.
5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total
allowable concentration (permit limits) for each pollutant using the following
equation:
Ca = (s7Q10 + Qw) (Cwgs) — (s7Q10) (Cb)
Qw
Where: Ca = allowable effluent concentration (µg/L or mg/L)
Cwqs = NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria (µg/L or mg/L)
Cb = background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants except NH3*
(µg/L or mg/L)
Qw = permitted effluent flow (cfs, match s7Q10)
s7Q10 = summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity
and human health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from
noncarcinogens (cfs)
* Discussions are on -going with EPA on how best to address background
concentrations
Flows other than s7Q 10 may be incorporated as applicable:
IQ 10 = used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity
Page 7 of 8

QA = used in the equation to protect human health through the
consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from carcinogens
30Q2 = used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality
6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each
pollutant of concern. Data entered must have been taken within four and one-half
years prior to the date of the permit application (40 CFR 122.21). The RPA
spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper concentration of each pollutant.
The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total allowable
concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max
exceeds the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations, the discharge is
considered to show reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard, and
a permit limit (Total allowable concentration) is included in the permit in
accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support Document for Water Quality -
Based Toxics Control published in 1991.
7. When appropriate, permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules
in accordance with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10, 2007 from James
Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on 40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements.
8. The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent
chromium and hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards. As a cost savings
measure, total chromium data results may be used as a conservative surrogate in
cases where there are no analytical results based on chromium III or VI. In these
cases, the projected maximum concentration (95th %) for total chromium will be
compared against water quality standards for chromium III and chromium VI.
9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the
discharge, are inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness -
dependent metals to ensure the accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more
robust hardness dataset.
10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this
permit included:
Parameter
Value
Comments (Data Source)
Average Effluent Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
Total as, CaCO3 or Ca+M
Average Upstream Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
[Total as, CaCO3 or Ca+M ]
7Q10 summer cfs
N/A
No RPA necessary
1 10 cfs
N/A
No RPA necessary
Permitted Flow MGD
N/A
No RPA necessary
Page 8 of 8

Young, Brianna A
From: Vito Montaperto <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 9:50 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Subject: [External] Re: Issued NPDES Permit NCO073393
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Ms Young, the main owner of Dana Hill is an Octogenarian that does not email. Please, if possible, continue to send
written correspondence as if something would happen to me, there would be no further email ability to
communicate. Vito
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, 8:55 AM Young, Brianna A <[e-mail]> wrote:
Good morning,
In order to provide more convenience, control, and security to our permittees and assist them in processing their
transactions, the Division of Water Resources is currently transitioning towards electronic correspondence. This will
hopefully provide more efficient service to our permittees and other partners and will allow us to more effectively
process and track documents. We are writing to ask you for your approval of the transmittal of documents related
to your permitting and related activities with the Division in an electronic format. Documents will be emailed to the
appropriate contact person(s) in your organization in a PDF format.
Please respond to me through email with verification that transmittal of your documents in an electronic manner is
acceptable to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Brianna Young, MS
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources
Office: 919-707-3619

Brian na.Young(a�ncdenr.gov (e-mail preferred during State of Emergency)
Mailing address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Physical address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access
to appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle
your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this
challenging time.

Young, Brianna A
From: Ashley Ogle <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 8:57 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Subject: [External] Re: Issued NPDES Permit NCO073393
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Yes, this would be great!
Thank you,
Ashley Ogle
Office Manager
James & James Env. Mgt.
828-697 oo6,3
a.ogleofficemgr_ jiemi.net
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:55 AM Young, Brianna A <[e-mail]> wrote:
Good morning,
In order to provide more convenience, control, and security to our permittees and assist them in processing their
transactions, the Division of Water Resources is currently transitioning towards electronic correspondence. This will
hopefully provide more efficient service to our permittees and other partners and will allow us to more effectively
process and track documents. We are writing to ask you for your approval of the transmittal of documents related
to your permitting and related activities with the Division in an electronic format. Documents will be emailed to the
appropriate contact person(s) in your organization in a PDF format.
Please respond to me through email with verification that transmittal of your documents in an electronic manner is
acceptable to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Brianna Young, MS

Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources
Office: 919-707-3619
Brian na.Young(cDncdenr.aov (e-mail preferred during State of Emergency)
Mailing address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Physical address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access
to appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle
your requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this
challenging time.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
HENDERSON COUNTY
CERTIFICATION OF PUBLICATION
I, Kathy Biltoft, affirming the following under the penalties of perjury
state:
I am employed by Times -News, an affiliate of Gatehouse Media, The
Times -News is a daily newspaper of general circulation published in the
city of Hendersonville, county of Henderson, and state of North
Carolina. I hereby certify that the advertisement annexed hereto was
published in the editions of The Times -News on the following date or
dates:
And that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or
legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and
qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina
and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of
the General Statutes of North Carolina.
i A
(Signed)
Kathy Biltoft
Swom to and subscribed before me,
t, day of November. 2020.
NlandyHbgsed 1
Notary Public for outh Carolina
My commission expires on: September 91", 2025
This document was notarized in South Carolina
_ i•a ptOTARy m'': c
a 1 pUBLiG f ? z
;ter`•. y `�:
fill
SOUT11'11G�P�``�`
10,31, 2020 I
106 Henderson Crossing Plaza • Hendersonville, NC 28 992
P. O. Box 490 • Hendersonville, NC 28793
828/692-0505 • FAX [phone] • 828/693-5581
www. blueridcenow. com

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Facility: Dana Hill WWTP
PermitNo. NC0073393
Prepared By: Brianna Young
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.03
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 0.2
Enter w7Q10 cfs : 0.3
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1)
Ammonia (Summer)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.2
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.2
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.03
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.03
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0465
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0465
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
18.86
IWC (%)
18.86
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
90
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
4.4
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliform
w7Q10 (CFS)
0.3
Monthly Average Limit:
200/100ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.03
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0465
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
5.30 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
13.42
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
12.0
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals)
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis)
If the allowable ammonia concentration is > 35 mg/L, no limit shall be imposed
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)

Mr. Montaperto
Page 3
Engineer's Certification
�k
€�. NOV - 5 2007
' S
,
DENR - WATER 11UAL11
f,. POINT SOURCE DRA0
1 Jon H. Laughter , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction
of
the project,
Dana Hill Community
Dana Hill Corporation WWTP Dana D AC!Dl525 for the
Location
Project Name
Permittee hereby states that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the following installations:
• The proportional splitting of flow to the 0.02 MGD package plant and the refurbished 0.01
MGD package plant,
• The addition of a 500 gallon baffled chamber for dechlorination of treated wastewater from
both package plants (0.02 MGD and 0.01 MGD),
• An effluent composite sampler to be installed at the end of all treatment components (for
final effluent sampling of treated wastewater),
• and all additional piping and appurtenances.
Flow Meter & Recorder; ppE��ast1ech-VantSagfnel��Model 2210rMeterR�
Once construction under this ATC 1tzi�rb�2ttOP041& d Z�id' ar' Kffljjj�c4� &PaE it�a� g r
submitted, the permittee is authorized to operate the units listed above, urith permitted limits as
specified in the NPDES permit NCO073393 issued November 8, 2000. This Authorization to
Construct permit will allow the increase in permitted flow from 0.02 MGD to 0.03 MGD design flow
for Dana Hill WWTP.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those
as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional wastewater
treatment units or modification oId*&Ii.units.
Signature
Laughter, Aust�
es, PA
_ Registration No.NC 4066
Jon H. Laught& I rvo.4os6
Date October 31, 20070',
Mail this Certification to the 'r,,y L Al ES Unit
I"Y`"3 ''' L�+ NR/DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
September 30, 2004
Mr. Vito Montaperto, Manager
Dana Hill Corporation
925 Dana Road
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Subject: Authorization to Construct Permit Issuance
ATC Number 073393AOI
Dana Hill Corporation WWTP
NPDES Permit NCO073393
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Montaperto:
A request for an Authorization to Construct (ATC) was received by the Division and final
plans and specifications for this project have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory.
Authorization is hereby granted for the improvements to Dana Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WWTP). In general, this ATC allows:
• The proportional splitting of flow to the 0.02 MGD package plant and the refurbished 0.01
MGD package plant,
• The addition of a 500 gallon baffled chamber for dechlorination of treated wastewater from
both package plants (0.02 MGD and 0.01 MGD),
• An effluent composite sampler to be installed at the end of all treatment components (for
final effluent sampling of treated wastewater),
• and all additional piping and appurtenances.
Once construction under this ATC has been completed and an Engineer's Certificate has been
submitted, the permittee is authorized to operate the units listed above, with permitted limits as
specified in the NPDES permit NCO073393 issued November 8, 2000. This Authorization to
Construct permit will allow the increase in permitted flow from 0.02 MGD to 0.03 MGD design flow
,for Dana Hill WWTP.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those
as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional wastewater
treatment units or modification of treatment units.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with NPDES Permit No.
NCO073393 issued November 8, 2000, and shall be subject to revocation unless the wastewater
treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and limitations specified in
the permit.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
The Asheville Regional Office, telephone number (828) 296 - 4500, shall be notified at
least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 On the Internet at http://h2o.enr."e.nc.us/

Mr. Montaperto
Page 2
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified water pollution control treatment system operator to be in responsible charge
(ORC) of the water pollution control treatment system. The operator must hold a certificate of the
type and grade at least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the water
pollution control treatment system by the Certification Commission. The Permittee must also
employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and grade to comply with the
conditions of Title 15A, Chapter 8G, .0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each Class I facility
at least weekly and each Class II, 1I1, and IV facility at least daily, excluding weekends and
holidays, and must properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the facility
and must comply with all other conditions outlined in Title 15A, Chapter 8G, .0204. Once the
facility is classified, the Permittee must submit a letter to the Certification Commission which
designates the operator in responsible charge within: (A) Sixty calendar days prior to wastewater
being introduced into a new system or (B) within 120 calendar days of the following, (i) after
receiving notification of a change in the classification of the system requiring the designation of a
new ORC and back-up ORC or (ii) a vacancy in the position of ORC or back-up ORC.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
The Operational Agreement between the Permittee and the Environmental Management
Commission is incorporated herein by reference and is a condition of this Permit. Noncompliance
with the terms of the Operational Agreement shall subject the Permittee to all sanctions provided
by G. S. 143-215.6 for violation of or failure to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of
this Permit.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility has
been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to the NPDES Unit, Division of Water
Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Susan A. Wilson, P.E., telephone
number [phone], extension 510.
Sincerely,
an W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Central Files
NPDES Unit, Permit File
Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
Mr. Jon Laughter, P.E. Laughter, Austin, and Associates, P.A.
131 Fourth Avenue East
Hendersonville, NC 28792

ATC SUMMARY
SCOPE
Dana -Hill Retirement Community
Henderson County, NC
ATC No. 073393AOI
UT Devils Fork, C
French Broad River Basin, 040302
Henderson County
The scope of the project includes the addition of flow splitting to split flow between previously
approved 0.02 MGD plant and refurbished (and previously approved) 0.01 MGD plant. Both plants
are full package plants with tablet chlorination. This addition also includes a dechlorination basin
and composite effluent sampling.
REVIEW SUMMARY
Executive Summary
The subject facility received an NPDES renewal permit November 8, 2000. This facility also
received an ATC for a 0.02 MGD package plant February 18, 1999 with the stipulation that if the
0.01 MGD plant were to be used - flow proportioning between the plants must be provided. This
ATC includes the flow proportioning, along with dechlorination and effluent composite sampling.
Application/Plans Prepared by:
Jon H. Laughter, P.E.
Laughter, Austin, and Associates, P.A.
131 Fourth Avenue East
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Project Location:
Henderson County
Review Notes: The existing splitter box in the 0.02 MGD plant will be used to split flow to the 0.02
MGD plant and the refurbished 0.01 MGD plant. Both package plants have tablet chlorination
with 30 minute contact time. With this ATC, the permittee is being proactive and adding a 500
gallon baffled chamber for dechlorination (tablet). Effluent sampling is shown at the beginning of
dechlor chamber - this should be placed at the end of the chamber.
This ATC will increase the permitted flow to 0.03 MGD (for which it is permitted).
Mr. Roy Davis, ARO, strongly recommends issuance. Although the plans are somewhat inadequate
- he has spoken with the operator and assures me that the operator will make this work properly.
Due to this and the minimal requirements for this ATC, I will issue it. The facility is being
proactive with dechlorination. The plans indicated effluent sampling at the beginning of
dechlorination. I will state that effluent sampling should be conducted at the end of the
dechlorination basin.
t
Ut. 14Y fDv'S
CpaF! Dwits 1ppezrDe2,
Page 1

0?33�3 A01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan Wilson
FROM: Roy Davis Kl��
AIT�WWA
s
NCDENF1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTIO
July 15, 2004
•.w:�:
I
' r
JUL 2 1 2004
j J DENR - yy�TER DUALITY ),
,�-,.,......_ POINT SOURCE 13RANCH1
SUBJECT: Dana -Hill Retirement Community
NPDES Permit Number Nc0073393
Request for Authorization to Construct
Henderson County
I am writing this in response to your June 8, 2004 memorandum and
attached March 23, 2004 request for Authorization to Construct from Jon
Laughter. The request is seeking permission to construct appurtenances
necessary to reactivate a 10,000 gpd package plant to be operated in
parallel with a 20,000 gpd plant currently in operation. Specifically Jon
Laughter proposes to construct a tube type effluent dechlorination
system, relocate the recording flow meter, install a composite sampler
and modify an existing influent flow splitter to serve both plants.
On July 7, 2004 I visited the plant in the company of the owner and ORC.
I recommend that you issue the requested Authorization to Construct based
on the information we currently have in our hands. I have confidence that
the ORC can take the plans and modify the Dana -Hill sewage treatment
plant in such a way that it will work quite satisfactorily. As always, I
would enjoy the opportunity to talk to you if we need to discuss this
matter further.
73393mem.04
2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

maAbox:///C I /Documents%20and%20Set6rgs/chades weaver/App...
Subject: Re: Dana Hill A to C
From: Charles Weaver <charles.weaver(p ncmail.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:44:05 -0500
To: Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
BCC: Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>
Roy:
Two AtC permits have been issued for the Dana -hill WWTP (NC0073393).
0073393AC was issued on January 9, 1990, for the original 0.01 MGD -plant. Jon
Laughter submitted a completion certification for it on August 19, 2002.
073393ACB was issued on February 18, 1999, for a new 0.02 MGD plant. No completion
certification was submitted, though Laughter did say that the plant was "in service"
in the letter accompanying the certification for 0073393AC.
Permit 073393ACB states that another AtC "for flow -proportioning facilities must be
requested" before the Permittee can operate the two treatment trains together [for a
total capacity of 0.03 MGD]. There's no record that the owner (Vito Montaperto),
the engineer (Laughter) or their contract operator (Harry James of James & James)
has ever requested such an AtC. Vito called me in November asking for proof we had
received the completion certificate for the 0.01 MGD plant; I faxed it to him.
Laughter called me in December asking for the same thing; I faxed it to him. You
asked for it last month - I faxed it to you.
Larry James called yesterday, and I fared it to him.
It sounds from your message that what they really wanted was an AtC for operating
both plants together, and we have NO RECORD THATfANYONE EVER REQUESTED IT. Further,
if any of the parties involved has asked me for "approval to operate both plants", I
could have researched the problem long ago. however, I received a succession of
calls asking for approval "to use the 10,000-gallon plant", which I provided. Thus
my confusion and extreme frustration, and thus our current problem.
If they want to operate the 0.01 MGD train, they can.
If they want to operate the 0.02 MGD train, they can.
If they want to operate the two trains together, they must request an AtC and show
how flow will be proportioned among the two trains.
I recommend they contact Susan Wilson or Mike Templeton in our Unit for advice on
preparing the AtC request. I don't issue AtCs and could offer little help.
CHW
Iof1
2J18J2004 2:04 PM

imap://charles.weave&/o4Odwq. [e-mail]:143L .
Subject: Dana Hill A to C
From: Roy Davis <Roy.Davis@}p ncmail.net>
Date: Tue,17 Feb 2004 08:39:03 -0500
To: Charles Weaver <Charles.Weaver cr ncmail.net>
Several weeks ago I heard through the grape vine that an A to C had been
issued to Dana Hill Retirement Community (NC0073393) for flow
equalization, piping and relocation of disinfection and flow measurement
to allow the- utilization of a pr_esently out-o-f-usa 10, 000 gpd WWT.P in
conjunction with an existing 20,000 gpd currently -in -use WWTP. I left
you a voice mail message asking that you send me a copy of the A to C.
You faxed me a copy of the 1990 Engineer's Certification relating to the
original construction of the 10,000 gpd WWTP. A review of ARG filed
does not produce a copy of an A to C for the necessary improvements to
operate the two preatment plants in parallel. In my dealings with the
owners and their consulting engineer that will be my position. If I am
wrong please I -et me know before I start sawing on this limb I am sitting
on. 'Thanks, Ray Davis
Roy Davis - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: 82a=2-51-64-52
Roy Davis <Roym%vt @ncmai` .net>
NC-DENIt- Asfievitre-Regional-Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
1 of 1 2/1-8/2094 2-04 PM

Jon H.Laughter
Donald J. Austin
Thomas P. Welbourn
James D. Chambless, Sr.
Laughter, Austin and Associates, P.A.
Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying
131 FOURTH AVENUE EAST
HENDERSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2879
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Christie Jackson
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2
[phone]
Fax [phone]
WATS 1-800-858-LAND
May 19, 2003
Project: Dana Hills Residential Community
Dana Hills Corporation
WWTP-10K GAL.: Return to Service
Henderson County
LAA Job No. 02-200
Application Preliminary New Sul n itt:il Revision
Final Submittal Information You Requested Additional Info. Requested
For Approval As -Built Submittal Completion Certification
Request To Start Construction For Your Files Other
------------
• NPDES Permit No. NCO073393 •
Dear Ms. Jackson,
In reference to your email comments dated 01 August 2002 to Roy Davis, Asheville
Regional Office pertaining to the aforementioned project, please find the following items
enclosed for purposes of review, acceptance, and approval:
1.)
2.)
Three (3) copies of Site Plan and Details drawings (sheets 1 and 2) of 10,000
GPD Treatment Plant.
Three (3) copies of manufactures specifications for Refrigerated Composite
Sampler (2 sheets) model ISCO 3710FR.
MAY A s 2003
X\\blontaperto02200 WWTP l0K\LTR02200DNN'Qjackson.doc f'

Christie Jackson
Division of Water Quality
Page 2; May 19, 2003
10K Gal. WWTP
Dana Hills Residential Community
Dana Hills Corporation
Henderson County
LAA Job No. 02-200
The plan drawings show (as requested) influent flow splitter, effluent dechlorination,
effluent recording flow meter, composite sampler.
If additional information is required or should you have any questions, please phone me
at [phone] or (800) 858-LAND. Facsimile [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
LAUGHTER, AUSTIN AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Jon H. Laughter, P.E.
JHL/JDC
Enclosures: YES
Proj. status: 1PR
Action: Review & approve
cc: Project file
X11Montaperto 02200 WWTP 1OK\LTR02200DWgackson.doc

n
(i
'/H
e"
Service
Access
SPLIT INFLUENT FLO
AT EXISTING
SPLITTER BOX
, Existing Treatment Plant
- 207000 GPD
IN—SERVICE
ATC No. 073393ACB
Q
x Dana Hill Corp. WWTP E°
W
EM/H 1
Ex151
1
n9 i°ump 51d11017 to 1'emdin. RELOCATE Flow Meter & Recorder
Ex;Sf%n TO NEW 500 GALLON Chamber
PROVIDE EFFLUENT DECHLORINATION
20,000 '7PD
NEW v_
s" I)IP e%wrr Pdd
INFLOW 6O\P p}schor98 pips
s.O/p 6" Orov}tY
9 Cfi. /ink fence 0�
OUT —OF —SERVICE
ATC No. XXXXXXXX
Existing Treatment Plant
M000 GPD.
Reconditioned —
Reconnect to Service
for Flow Proportioning
BEFORE YOU DIG I
CAS ULOCO
UNDERGROUND UMM LOCA72R SERVICE
TOLL FREE.• 1-800-882-4949
a H" AV7XZ ADASEW
N O T E
LDCATION OF EXISTING U7712I7ES ARE APPROXDIATE ONLY.
EXACT LOCATIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FLEW BY
THE CONTRACTOR.
EM/H 15
rro
INSTALL ISCO MODEL 3710FR
FIBERGLASS COMPOSITE SAMPLER
for Flow Proportioning
Existing Di5chdrge Point
NPDE5 Permit NCO0733 93
30,000 CPD
REQUEST PLACEMENT OF OLD 10,000 GPD PLANT TO SERVICE
TREA TMENT PLANT
To Serve
DANA HILLS RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
a`xrestter►�I
DANA HILLS CORPORATION 4,''',` GA®`�� °> &� J
�.�'•� ecue n� ntavoeRsav cnrl>rn nIc
828 692 — 8477 a AU5771V AND A550CLM5, PA
A 131 FOURTH AVL'IVUf EAST
Mr. V/to Monfepe�0 HfJVOE?SaWNl1Z NOR771 CAROLAW 28792
925 DANA ROAD }vo. s �,�, ,� JL , ,,,� [phone]
HENDER55NVYLLE, N.C. 20792 °"" °°"
,o I 7-3-M J= x p,.a„i yr Fw occau sr a�n aEsr �n
r WE 6Y AvvRV ppGpl101 auw n .Ax1IPM
9MIZ arrc�.,+>plaryt
REVISIONS ✓19B NO. 02-200 rum W Me- N, .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
August 1, 2002
Mr. Jon H. Laughter, P.E.
Laughter, Austin & Associates, P.A.
131 Fourth Avenue East
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Dear Mr. Laughter:
1 ffl�M;W,jmoo
•
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NCO073393
Authorization to Construct Return
Return #2171
Dana Hills WWTP
Henderson County
In accordance with Division policy, we must hereby return the attached Authorization to Construct
request received on July 15, 2002. After a preliminary review, the Division has determined that the
request package lacks the following items:
♦ Three (3) sets of plans (signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer)
♦ Three (3) sets of design specifications (signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer)
♦ Three (3) sets of design calculations (signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer)
♦ One letter from the Dana Hills Corporation authorizing Laughter, Austin and Associates, P.A.
as an authorized representative.
For your review, please find attached the Division's Authorization to Construct guidelines. If you have
any questions about the Authorization to Construct process, please contact Christie Jackson at
telephone number [phone], extension 538.
Sincerely,
David A. Goodrich
. NPDES Supervisor
cc: Central Files
NPDES Unit, Permit File
Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 - Telephone [phone]/FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Re: NC0073393 - Dana HIlls Corp.
Subject: Re: NCO073393 - Dana Hills Corp.
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 09:05:42 -0400
From: Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: Christie Jackson <[e-mail]>
Do it! Roy
Christie Jackson wrote:
> Thanks, Roy.
> What they have submitted is not a "complete" A to C request. I will have to
> return the request b/c we need more information. (Just an FYI)
> Thanks again,
> Christie
> Roy Davis wrote:
> > Christie: I would have to assume that Dana -Hill wants to put the old 10,000
> > gpd plant back in service. An A to C would be required; an item I explained
> > to their consulting engineer. Items needing an A to C: influentflow
tow
> > splitter, common effluent dechlorination, relocation of effluent recording
> > flow meter to a common point, refrigerated effluent composite sampler and
> > use of existing "old plant" influent flow equalization as pre -aeration. Roy
> > Christie Jackson wrote:
> > > Hey Roy,
> > > 1 have received a request from Dana Hills Corp. for a "return to
> > > service". I'mjust trying to get some insight as to what they're asking
> > >.for. Do you have an idea?
> > > They are currently permitted for 0.03 MGD and operating at 0.20 MGD. I
> > > wonder if they are planning to use the extra 0.10 MGD, for equalization
> > > or if they want to add that to the current_ f tow. Any help you can give
> > > would be appreciated.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Christie
> > Roy Davis - [e-mail]
> > North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
> > Asheville Regional Office
> > Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
> > 59 Woodfin Place
1 of 2 8/ 1/02 10:18 AN

Jon H. Laughter
Donald J. Austin
Thomas P. Welbourn
James D. Chambless, Sr.
Laughter, Austin and Associates, P.A.
Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying
131 FOURTH AVENUE EAST
HENDERSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28792
COMPLETION CER
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E., Director
Noah Carolina Division of Water Quality
I
ater Quality Section
No ischarge,,pernuttina Unit
161 rvice Center
1 ' , orth Carolina 27699-1617
Project
Dear Mr. Stevens:
[phone]
Fax [phone]
WATS 1-800-858-LAND
NALITY
CH '�(O
-I,?0
�ZREFF' r ZIAf�2
DANA HILLS WWTP; 10,000 GPD Cr�R,S O 17)-
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT ti
Henderson County 1
LAA Job No. 02-200
NCDENR-DWQ Permit, No, NCO073393 '
dated: January 9, 1990
Below, please find a Final COMPLETION CERTIFICATION for the
construction of a 10, 000 GPD Packaged Wastewater Treatment Plant consisting of an
influent pump station with dual 88 gpm grinder pumps and high water alarms, a bar
screen, a 2, 000 gallon equalization tank, a 10, 000 gallon aeration tank, a 2,214 gallon
clarifier, a 1, 995 gallon sludge holding tank, tablet chlorination, a 210 gallon chlorine
contact tank, dual 200 cfm blowers, effluent weir, 446 feet of 6-inch gravity effluent line
and a cascade aerator with discharge of treated wastewater into Devils Fork Creek under
NPDES Permit No. NCO073393 and all other related appurtenences.
I, JON H. LAUGHTER, as a duly Registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe periodically the above construction
of the Dana Hills WWTP located off Dana Road in Henderson County, Hendersonville,
NC for the Permittee hereby certify that to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial coWpliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
�;��NCAR
S o�2'.�Torth Carol' iofi l
Seal r �;4F -y ; and WMOMM
a
SEAL =
• NO.4066 •
ram` -
O F ,�k'.!
Signature �',. Dates G / g , Z ooz
JON H. LAUGHTER
cony documents\sewer\swrcer02200

David A. Goodrich, NPDES Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Page 2; August 19, 2002
1OK Gal. WWTP
Dana Hills Residential Community
Dana Hills Corporation
Henderson County
LAA Job No. 02-200
At present, a 20,000 GPD (0.02 MGD) WWTP under NCDENR ATC073393ACB is in-
service. An existing permitted 10,000 GPD (0.01 MGD) WWTP which has been
disconnected from service in the past, has recently undergone a complete re -conditioning.
Mr. Montaperto intends to put this permitted plant back into service along with the 20,000
gpd plant to expand his treatment capacity. This would provide a total treatment capacity
of 30,000 gpd. This combination of the two plants will provide flow proportioning of the
facilities.
If additional information is required or should you have any questions, please phone me at
[phone] or (800) 858-LAND. Facsimile [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
LAUGHTER, AUSTIN AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Jon H. Laughter, P.E.
Jdc
Enclosures: YES
Proj. status: 1PR
Action: Review & approve
cc: Project file
X\\Montaperto 02200 WWTP 10K\LTR02200ATCwwtp8.19.doc

Date: t L o2
,Time:
❑ Return
❑ Can to
❑ Call from
TELEPHONE RECORD
R.
Project: lAlW77)
&Mrs. aal7f Representing:
Address Lyl-a/I L/
Telephone: FAX:
Subject:
IdnTIM] 4411RAILAAMV
NEEDED FOLLOW-UP ACTION(S)
2.
3.
4.
5.
BY WHOM/WHEN
2.
S.
cc: Signed

DocuSign Envelope ID: 233877C9-5CD8-4827-8515-56A4EA6F428A
ROY COOPER
60erjlor
MICHAEL S. R.EGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
C4rc kW
Vito Montaperto
Dana -Hill Corporation
1010 Dana Rd
Hendersonville, NC 28792
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 21, 2020
SUBJECT: Approval to perform timed composite sampling
Permit No. NCO073393
Dana Hill WWTP
Henderson County
Dear Permittee:
The Dana Hill wastewater treatment plant is granted permission to perform constant time/constant volume
composite sampling as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0503 (4)(d) for permit reporting requirements in lieu of
flow -proportional sampling as requested. This permission is allowable because this facility has a design flow less
than or equal to 30,000 gallons/day and under that condition according to 15A NCAC 02B .0505 (c)(3)(113): The
Director may specify the methods of sample collection as to type of sample and type of composite sampling
required.
This approval is contingent upon your composite sampling consisting of aliquots of at least 100ml collected with
intervals not to exceed 20 minutes between aliquots. The Division reserves the right to change the method of
composite sampling again if we find reason to believe that this timed composite method is not producing
representative samples.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Daniel Boss with the Water Quality
Regional Operations Section in the Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
r-� 7E617A38285848C...
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Ec: WQS ARO Server, Laserfiche
G:\WR\WQ\Henderson\Wastewater\Minors\Dana Hill 73393\Permission letter for timed composite sampling at Dana Hill.rtf
North Caro:!rs Deps rtrrert 4 Ery ror!rerts• .Y Ls tY I D vs -on of W*ter Resorrces
Aslrev;;e Regions Off.De I 2DSD L.S. 7D F grvia_: I Swar-nanos, North Faro€ins 28778

DocuSign Envelope ID: AABFOBDB-7C60-4D98-912F-ACC806253B30
ROY COOPER
Cover wr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
ureetor
Vito Montaperto
Dana -Hill Corporation
1010 Dana Rd
Hendersonville, NC 28792
NORTH CAROLINA
Envrranin'"tdr Quality
July 07, 2020
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Dana Hill WWTP
NPDES WW Permit No. NCO073393
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Montaperto:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted a follow-up inspection of the Dana Hill WWTP on
7/07/2020. The blower belts now have guards over them and therefore are no longer a safety hazard. Timed
composite sampling is now allowed for this facility and so it may continue utilizing this method.
NOV-2019-PC-0625 has now been closed, since these corrections have been made.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Daniel Boss with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4500 or via email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by,
7E617A38285848C...
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS
Ec: WQS ARO Server
Nofth Carofiaa Depaft ment of Envirortrnenta] Quad rty I D'v'sbre of Water Resources
.aE 4shevd)e Regional Office 12090 U.S. 703igfiway I Swwmartoa, North Caro;ina 23773
� s2s�ssoo

DocuSign Envelope ID: AABFOBDB-7C60-4D98-912F-ACC806253B30
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 1 3 I NCO073393 111 121 20/07/07 I17
18 I r I 19 I G I 201 I
211IIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII I IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII l66
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA
---------------------- Reserved -------------------
67
N j
701 I 71 I tyI 72 L l1
LJ —
731 I 174 79 I I I I I I 180
I I I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:10AM 20/07/07
16/02/01
Dana Hill WWTP
1010 Dana Rd
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Hendersonville NC 28792
11:00AM 20/07/07
20/11/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Shannon D James/ORC/828-697-0063/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Vito Montaperto,1010 Dana Rd Hendersonville NC 28792//828-692-8477/8286921759
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Operations & Maintenar 0 Self -Monitoring Progran
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
Lauren E Armeni Iw Q� w DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4500/
7/8/2020
Daniel J Boss°°" 8"°'�°E6 DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4658/
��
7/8/2020
C�AAaFF
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
7/8/2020
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

DocuSign Envelope ID: AABFOBDB-7C60-4D98-912F-ACC806253B30
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NC0073393 I11 12I 20/07/07 117 18 i c i
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On 7/7/2020 1 (Daniel Boss) and Lauren Armeni conducted a follow-up compliance evaluation of the
Dana Hill WWTP.
Timed effluent composite sampling is now permitted for this facility, and so they are now in compliance
for their sampling method.
The blower motor belts now have guards covering them to prevent injury, and are no longer a safety
concern.
Page#

DocuSign Envelope ID: AABFOBDB-7C60-4D98-912F-ACC806253B30
Permit: NCO073393 Owner -Facility: Dana Hill WWTP
Inspection Date: 07/07/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: This pump station doesn't have telemetry or SCADA.
Equalization Basins
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the basin aerated?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
. in
Aeration Basins
Yes No
NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
❑ ❑
0
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Page# 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: AABFOBDB-7C60-4D98-912F-ACC806253B30
Permit: NCO073393 Owner -Facility:
Inspection Date: 07/07/2020 Inspection Type:
Dana Hill WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Settleabilitv for one train was 74% in 30 min. The supernatant was very clear.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
❑
❑
0
❑
Are weirs level?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment: There was about 2' of clear water and 3' of blanket out of 9' of depth in the clarifier tested.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
M
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
0
❑
❑
❑
representative)?
Comment: This facility uses timed composite sampling which has been permitted by the Division for
this facility.
Page# 4

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0073393 MRS Betweel 0 - 2015 and10 - 2020 Region: %
Facility Name: % Param Nam(% County: %
Major Minor: %
Report Date: 10/08/2C Page 1 of 3
Violation Category:% Program Category:
Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
PERMIT: NCO073393 FACILITY: Dana -Hill Corporation - Dana Hill WWTP COUNTY: Henderson REGION: Asheville
Limit Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
01 -2016
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
01/07/16
Weekly
mg/I
45
59.4
32
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
08-2016
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/02/16
Weekly
mg/I
45
46.5
3.3
Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOD
Concentration
Exceeded
03-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
03/20/19
Weekly
mg/I
45
46.5
3.3
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
03-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
03/29/19
Weekly
mg/I
45
66.9
48.7
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
03 - 2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
03/31 /19
Weekly
mg/I
30
50.48
68.3
Monthly Average
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
01 -2016
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
01/07/16
Weekly
#/100ml
400
600
50
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
05-2016
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
05/31/16
2 X month
mg/I
4.4
5.3
20.5
Monthly Average
Proceed to
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
08/05/19
2 X month
mg/I
22
28
27.3
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
08/31/19
2 X month
mg/I
4.4
28
536.4
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
08-2019
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
08/31/19
2 X month
mg/I
4.4
9.33
112.1
Monthly Average
Proceed to
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
07-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
07/03/19
Weekly
mg/I
45
94
108.9
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
07-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
07/31/19
Weekly
mg/I
30
36.07
20.2
Monthly Average
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/12/19
Weekly
mg/I
45
48
6.7
Daily Maximum
Proceed to
Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
%
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
08-2019 001 Effluent BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - 08/03/19 Weekly mg/I Frequency Violation Proceed to
Concentration Enforcement Case

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date: 10/08/2C Page
2 of 3
Permit:
nc0073393
MRS Betweel 0 - 2015 and10 - 2020
Region:
%
Violation Category:%
Program Category: %
Facility Name: %
Param Nam(%
County:
%
Subbasin: %
Violation Action: %
Major Minor:
%
PERMIT: NCO073393
FACILITY: Dana -Hill Corporation - Dana Hill WWTP
COUNTY: Henderson REGION: Asheville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE LIMIT
VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
08-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/17/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/24/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
08/31/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
06-2018
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
06/02/18
2 X week
ug/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
08-2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
08/03/19
2 X week
ug/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/03/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/17/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/24/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/31/19
Weekly
#/100ml
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Broth, 44.5 C
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
08/31/19
2 X month
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
N) - Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
pH
08/03/19
Weekly
su
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/03/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/17/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/24/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Solids, Total Suspended -
08/31/19
Weekly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Concentration
Enforcement Case
08-2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
08/03/19
Weekly
deg c
Frequency Violation
Proceed to
Centigrade
Enforcement Case

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0073393 MRS Betweel 0 - 2015 and10 - 2020 Region: %
Facility Name: % Param Nam(% County: %
Major Minor: %
Report Date: 10/08/2C Page 3 of 3
Violation Category:% Program Category: %
Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
PERMIT: NCO073393 FACILITY: Dana -Hill Corporation - Dana Hill WWTP COUNTY: Henderson REGION: Asheville
Reporting Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
07-2019 08/31/19 Late/Missing DMR Proceed to
Enforcement Case

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Dana -Hill Corporation
Attn: Vito Montaperto, Treasurer
1010 Dana Rd
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO073393
Dana Hill WWTP
Henderson County
Dear Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 19, 2020
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the March 3, 2020 receipt of your permit renewal application and
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 150E-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deg.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sincerely
Redford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North Caroline Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regional Office 12090 U.S. 70 Ht#hway I Swonnanos, North Carouno 28778
828�M-4500

James & James Environmental Management, Inc.
3801 Asheville Hwy., Hendersonville, N. C. 28791
OFFICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
January 10, 2020
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1617
Regarding All Waste Water Facilities Operated by James & James Environmental Mgt., Inc
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is to request the renewal of the permit for the waste water treatment facility of Dana Hill
Corporation WWTP, NPDES number NC0073393.
Sludge from this facility are pumped by either Mike's Septic or ACL Septic. Our primary dump
locations are at MSD & City of Hendersonville.
Sincerely
WVj
Ashley Ogle
Office Manager
James and James Environmental Mgt., Inc.
828-697-0063
[e-mail]

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. DENR / Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit �NCO073393
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
Dana Hill Corporation
Facility Name
Dana Hill Corporation
Mailing Address
1010 Dana Road F
City
Hendersonville 4R 0 3 2020
State / Zip Code
NC 28792 NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES
Telephone Number
828-692-8477
Fax Number
828-692-1756
e-mail Address
Veee ee'e' to (J !I t.i . co,l,,l
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above X
Street Address or State Road
State / Zip Code
County
Henderson
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Dana Hill Corporation
Mailing Address
1010 Dana Road
City
Hendersonville
State / Zip Code
NC 28792
Telephone Number
828-692-8477
Fax Number
828-692-1756
e-mail Address
1 of 3 Form-D 11/12

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
4. Description of wastewater:
Facility Generating Wastewater(check all that apply):
Industrial ❑ Number of Employees
Commercial ❑ Number of Employees
Residential g Number of Homes ) c{ L
School Number of Students/Staff
Other Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (example: subdivision, mobile home park, shopping centers,
restaurants, etc.):
Mobile Home Park
Number of persons served: a115
5. Type of collection system
X Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
6. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points 1
Outfall Identification number(s) 001
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes X No
?. Name of receiving stream(s) (NEW applicants: Provide a map showing the exact location of each
outfallr
Unnamed Tributary to Devils Fork in the French Broad River Basin
8. Frequency of Discharge: X
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs:
Continuous ❑ Intermittent
Duration:
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the space provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
A 0.030 MGD facility with influent lift station with dual pumps and high water alarm,
flow equalization basin with manual bar screen and flow splitter box, dual (20,000 gallon
& 10,000 gallon) aeration basins, dual hoppered clarifiers with airlift skimmers and
sludge return, aerobic digestor, table chlorination, chlorine contact chamber, tablet
dechlorination, dechlorination chamber, post aeration chamber, ultrasonic now meter,
effluent composite sampler.
2 of 3 Form-D 11/12

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
10. Flow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flow 0.030 MGD
Annual Average daily flow 0.013 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily flow 0.07 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
11. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑ Yes X No
12. Effluent Data
NEW APPLICANTS: Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliform, Temperature and pH shall be grab
samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported,
report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
RENEWAL APPLICANTS: Provide the highest single reading (Daily Maximum) and Monthly Average over
the past 36 months for parameters currently in your permit. Mark other parameters "N/A".
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODs)
19.2
11.6
MG/L
Fecal Coliform
<2.0
1.3
CFU/ 100ML
Total Suspended Solids
20.9
16.9
MG/L
Temperature (Summer)
31.0
26.9
C
Temperature (Winter)
17.0
11.3
C
pH
7.4
7.1
units
13. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type Permit Number Type
Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
UIC (SDWA)
NPDES NCO073393
PSD (CAA)
Non -attainment program (CAA)
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
NESHAPS (CAA)
Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA)
Other
Permit Number
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
1 0 1" o✓17'a e'r-jr4asv,r&r
Printed name of P rson Signing Title
d 6 M oZL
la -
Signature dV Api6licant Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any
application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method
required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
3 of 3 Form-D 11/12

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: - NCoo '_7 3 3 93
FACILITY NAME: i1Gy1 J-aka erfdeS. S� -,
Facility Status: Extb"! IG `pltOpO b
(circle one) 1
Permit. Status: RENEWAL HoDgWATM MrrrED NEW
- (circle one)
Major+Qa,�
Pipe No: n Q1
Design ,Capacity (MGD):
Domestic (% of Flow): "L
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: Ferk
Class:
Sub -Basin: —_ -03-0'2-
Reference USGS Quad: - F 2�� . (please attach)
County: elJvr JeM
Regional Office: As Fa Me . Re Wa Wi WS
(circle one)
Requested Rom•
Prepared I
Reviewed
Lila ✓ lRYri�
Date:
Date:
Date: lti
I - 'D ____
Modeler
Date Rec.
# '
�C
Wz,
Drainage Area (mid) O- % Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) 0. 2 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) D. 3 30Q2 (cfs) S
Toxicity Limits: IWC S (circle one) Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream A/
Downstream N
Location
Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
SODS (mg/1)
30
NHa N (mg/0
D.O. (mg/0
TSS (mg/0
30
F. Col. (/100ml)
1000r.
pH (SU)
6-7

-^ -�--�-- ' WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROYAL F�'` . ----------- - �L
' U� �_��� � U�� �� l�
: ' ' '
Type of Waste : DOMESTIC
Status " `N[;POQ£''`K4K� � �
MAR
i tream UT DEVILS F[R�. [ '
5 . ea'^ Cl�s : C
Subba' : n : ' 0�-'�` ��hC;iO� ��%in��{ 01,TCe
sq.
'/;zhonw Of ice : A`` '=r=e low :rfs) : 1'4
' to : HARR S Summer ' (cfs) : 0''
f Reques' : 2/26/2..
: F9SW
------ -- ------- P[[3MMENDED EFFLUENT LIMPS ---'---------------------
.
�ac�efIn� /mgc), 0.042
9-Cay BOD (mg' l . : A (:.- ��
� J » �
Ammonia Nitrogen ("' l�: n, �� ly
Djssc \ .'s� Oxygen ( `` l > : n
� 'mg/l): 0� °
Fecal /`oliforn '0/100 l : 10)
pH SU}. 6-9
:
:
:
-------------------------------- MONITORING �- �----- -- Upstrpam (Y/Na (Y/Na N Locatior^
Downstrea'" (Y.U): N Lucotion:
-- ------------'--- - ---------- COMMENTS - - ---- -- ---- --------- ---
_..... ....
Frc
Reviewea by..
r.h. ?`-op't Superviso, Da
Reg onal r
Per its & Engineerir�
- �-�------.... ..... ..... ^=.... ---- --7 '-
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICE' BY

0�✓036 Z
b3, ffb ? ,75b
Q/f= 7?AmI?-
�# = 4, c-fs
w791>= 3,7c(3
30?L 6,OeA
qIll- ✓,�C-4
s 79/J = 0, Zcr
w 7p /0 0, 3 cT3
S7Q /off � o
A',
f

0-
�/� i7 wi � Frn�r4 / 7x 1, = 1pdw
/,bc73 t 27cZCr = ld�7c-,6
cfs
OKA PC -ill
p ifJsw 46 ,' t> 6, z 7�19. 97� = l,f 7 Cx�

^ ^
'
MODEL FOR MONFAPE9TU EWER
. .
PRISES INC.
Discha'ce.
' '
INC'
Receiving
3h
o'n
:
UT DEVILS
FORK CREEK
----------�
The End
2'i
is
6.!7
mg/l.
Th+ �.^a
CBOD
s
11.55
mg'l.
NBOD
_____________
1'
mg/l'
____________
_ _ _
_________
WLA
uLA
WLA
DO
Mi
NBOD
Du 0-sFlo
Wwk
Milepoin`
':wach #
(mg!l)
(mg/l)
(mg/l>
------
_______
____
Segment
1
5.82
'�'.00
1
Reach
1
45 '`.
90.00
0.0420

..., -
s �s P., I : +s— +__ , , fi_. .c. s ••+ +
�.. y.., I...'.
i s B
4-:'+I i; 3:�' 1•• a `t..{ a .- 13 .1
:Ere- 1i E: "Ci if- ! DEPTH! p� ! Kd 1 c
f.ct�cTl:F LrJPL: v;=�t•UI;Y Er :s: ,.. !
Ka I
� .M, 11 KN
i ;fNR i NR
f a.lt F ftllmi.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2200,tie5lgrtl
a 0
t< 5iys: s20
t3€Sigri" 3204
1
reerr, } + I (y AO: C N!
.� u'1.-:� t . Vr 4€1 +?,SrV�1
h f 6k i 33 1 Al 39 t t 3 1 7 [ 1
Vrl� f i}• 3 -r J7 F L�r3`# I Jr�G F
ry iyi
/el i
11 tZ 1 0 0!
i.r0 } •vc'
f3 L•1 1 t 00
• .riFJ + Vs.tiF i
,'mart, t + 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1
F !
:..:
rrsc::::'
.....:-. . ". __
F 1 ..•i l..t
!
:J 000
.t .1
!
, y
'ri
-:!
i 1..."-t- f 1
;"irv00t•; t
Tr
n1.S{I'3

.a
i i": eti l :._
#
Sell t • i i
.:_J i..! 1
i
i•`:
•�
..at,
a
50
:. '7
1
0.40
A 17
11.55
19,
L:'S I
OW
i wa :.ti {.1
l:�
1 R. {»^ , 1...!
'1:F i
_
i.:} �'• f•a' { � .(.
i
1 d.: .: i_i ::
� �
-
J. f..1 t^r i
i
^
_
jj „,
t
12.56
22.86
7 :::}{:':: {..}
1 ,.
i
.::}e`::1 (t
1 La., :
1... a„}CK:.} i
1`d B €_l d.: ,
.i:!1%'
a.
0.10
5.92
12.30
22
n
0.30
6.09
1 <I. r. •... (..J
20.66
1.
it.
1
w
6.
1 1 ,r
.r 97
Sf::. g
tt'
�,ma..„ ,
0 i
a... i:'' L. M
1 ;
i._ .._ ...:..l �
i , a„ A..
F .i, o
d
1
12.
22.10
.17
11.55
19.97
i
i:: l...
' ' :
� �
r•, „ ia.} »
i:�Y.'{.� I'{.i
1) f !
n.J i..! x 1
t 7•` f'1 1
t..: .i..y �
.. nJ i
i:•f)..,f... �.1
' '•�' +
: .. f..�a..ryy',
.{ .. w 1
.. -- '
..
0.27
„4
: 1.�-
1. 1 a
19
.. .
,_} 5.:. i
1 Sell
.i.
'1':
1 R:":,.»a:-.
1 i 4... i.l i...
.'•I• 1
•: i' 1
Sell M
,::} i_.:.1 4 s a.
1
i .-. L,� �
1
f.._ F
Plow
1
rt 0•: 3
12.04
i a 3t
a .... ,
1
1.
0.30
-: -. -
11.2i
-
•.lr7
0.27
S:-::g
Via•
1 1'=c-:'aY._1 t
i': x
Seq 1 •.L
i .0. t
C..I.iC.3i.; ,
NB;r.D
Flow 1
i
0.10
5.92
12.30
22.10
0.? .
1
0...
ti�a w :_i!1
1. 2 x 04
2.j a
- r....
1.
{..}:..,..a
- ,..J f'»: Li
.l.
!'1:
Reach
1 a i... i:(,... f 3
I... 1
'�-1 F
..l hrj:,
Vic: f., { , .i.
Sell
� � , ( 3 1
:. n i..
1 ..J A..r
MOD 1
aEB t
..
r 17
q.
1 u } t
a.,. w ..
.56
x v_i 1..i
S F
11,80
1 1'.
::{:
..._..y.
1 Roach
.1.1.
Sell '1 1a:
,_: v_. 1 ,
D G r 1
i F
1'aB1 'iU 1
C.: a.. 6. a.i 1
�', 1._' 'f J } �
NBOD
A 1
i 1
1
.1.0.10
5
12.30
22a.1.0
27
'.
:i.
0.20
.01
12.04
21
.27
1 Sell
f i:}�:'j
t.
'i')
1 1..., .... .. .-
1 {-'ik»'i„t f.:: E
!(. 1
'IT 1
S„`„:_. 'tt.:
,_}f:'=l; � ,.{.
.,. 1
1 D.O.
i f..� rt �...i a 1
t'„'B D
t..:.4.•L...t `
i}'';' D 1
1 �a:.{a..3Y 1
1
"low f.:`-�Y i

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0073393
PERMITTEE NAME: Dana -Hill Corporation
FACILITY NAME: Dana -Hill Corporation WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major Minor _q
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.010 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
100 %
Comments:
FLOW LIMIT WILL BE REDUCED TO 10 000 GPD.
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Devil's Fork
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: -r-9 ATE F q sW (please attach)
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date:` 5/31/93 Treatment Plant Class: 11
Classification changes within three miles:
No chan Le
Requested by: Charles Lowe 0
Prepared by:
Reviewed by: i _ R A J A
Ss !�9 ,a
Date: 3/12/93
Date: 6 / 93
Date: 6
7P"
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
J A K)
3 z et3
I� C�
Drainage Area (mi` ) 0. 7 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): !, e
7Q 10 (cfs) 0, Z Winter 7Q 10 (cfs) 0. 3 30Q2 (cfs) 0,5
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Comments:

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7366 a�
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Dana -Hill Corporation
NCO073393
�
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
APR 2 9 1993
Receiving Stream:
UT Devil's Fork
i
Stream Classification:
C
Subbasin:
040302
Yl�i
9ifLITY SECTION
1, RMIONA1
County:
Henderson
Stream Characteristic:
zOFFICE
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
0344632545
Requestor:
Lowe
Date:
1988
Date of Request:
3/12/93
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.7
Topo Quad:
NNW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.2
F9 svJ
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.3
Average Flow (cfs):
1.4
30Q2 (cfs):
0.5
IWC (%):
7
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of permit with a modification for flow reduction from .042 MGD to
.010 MGD. Facility should be given flow reduction and NH3 Toxicity Option of existing limits
with chronic toxicity test or summer and winter NH3 limits.
Schedule R uirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
i-f C-,5" C osE S LZ&W Uf C- 1 1,_g Fo G a 0 AGD
Recommended by: Date: 4/20/93
Reviewed by !
Instream A
Regional S
Permits & ]
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: m Ay 2 6 1993
9--3
Jo
;.a
ip-
I've

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):.
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature (C):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
N113N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature (C):
Toxicity test (P/F):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Sumner Winter
0.042
30
monitor
nr
30
1000
6-9
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average with Monthly Average with
Toxicity Test
Ammonia
Limit
Summer Winter
Summer
Winter
0.010
0.010
0.010
30
30
30
monitor
11
32
nr
30
200
6-9
monitor
monitor
Chronic P/F @ 7%
Limita ChangesDue To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
nr
nr
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
WQ or EL
EL
WQ
Param ter Affected
Fecal Coliform
_X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•s
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing; Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No X
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not? M-PY16-V 96*PoRrs rxlD14_46- ?L'*N7' "A') At C&r
Recommend an SOC or compliance schedule for toxicity. The permittee should
work with Aquatic Toxicology to reduce toxocity (likely from chlorine). The permit should
contain THE language.
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, -if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

1-7
OV

64�03C) v
t ` '° ! °3 1"ts�f1`l�/�
k,iwr Ym �n i _ �ps1 s
fi7..9+MjL lL Fo�Z1C
pi..oc
6r ��i qo rz
i 7092: ;jl
•oe.37 rf

NICHOLSON MHP
DANA-HILL CORPORATION WWTP
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
0.2
7010 (CFS)
0.2
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.01
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.01
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0155
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0155
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
7.19
IWC (%)
7.19
Allowable Concentration (ug/1)
236.35
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
11.06
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7010 (CFS)
0.3
Fecal Limit
200 /100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.01
(based on 331 : 1)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0155
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
4.91
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
32,38
NCO066591 4/19/93

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO073393
PERMM EE NAME: Dana -Hill Corporation
FACILITY NAME: Dana -Hill Co tion WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal with Modification
Major Minor �
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: MGI)
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
100 %
Comments:
FLOW LIMIT WILL BE REDUCED TO 10,000 GPD.
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Devil's Fork
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: F 9 N1W F g s w (please attach)
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/93 Treatment Plant Class: II
Classification changes within three miles:
No change
Requested by: Charles Lowe Date:
Prepared by:- %y% Date:
r
Reviewed C �\ rC2. 1 Date:
4-
�- ILI
3/12/93
C/0-7
�3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
J114
3 Z
�t3
6
Drainage Area (mi` ) C, f' Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) O Z Winter 7Q10 (cfs) O. 3 30Q2 (cfs) ,S
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
30
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
3.4
q
D.O. (mg/1)
n
n/,
TSS (mg/1)
3o
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
2-0 0
200
pH (SU)
G-9
G-9
l�StduA��l'/�;Jltv�Q
Z,Y
zP
��si, �'iy7UiL eCJ
j�,t.•�, TW
,�n�
I
PLI
Comments:

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Dana -Hill Corporation
NCO073393
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
UT Devil's Fork
C
040302
Henderson
Asheville
Lowe
3/12/93
Request # 7366 B
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
0344632545
Date:
1988
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.7 ..
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.2
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.3
Average Flow (cfs):
1.4
30Q2 (cfs):
0.5
IWC (%): 2 q. S
76
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of permit with a modification for flow reduction from .042 MGD to
.010 MGD. ff facility can show justift atioti why permit at 0.042 MGD should be allowed then
these recommended limits would apply.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
P-Rr->Tc--&r 15 iN 141-rlAL S-4Gg-s DP' DE✓EL.G -*6L r, *1y A/EEP
Recommended by: ZDate: 4/20/93
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Sup*�
Permits & Engineerinj
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAY 2 6 1993
o 3

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existine Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.042
BODS (mg/1):
30
NH3N (mg/1):
monitor
DO (mg/1):
nr
TS S (mg/1):
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
1000
pH (SU):
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
Temperature (C):
monitor
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average with
Ammonia
Limit
Summer
Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.042
0.042
BODS (mg/1):
30
30 EL
NH3N (mg/1):
3.4
9 WQ
DO (mg/1):
nr
nr
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. V100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
28
28 WQ
Temperature (C):
monitor
monitor
Limits Chances Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Parameter(s) Affected.
Fecal Coliform,Chlorine,
NH3
_X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met? &6 l - "IL-OKY "L
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No _X
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not? OPIVOAI# - 'F96#rA4eA/7 Cff'MCOY kXL(- Ko�Uc'r %'a SC-
C,(,pyM,uc7ED FOX r-ww5 >,o)o A6D) `tAK1 J(r N#3 f (tOlt) 4V,
Recommend an SOC or compliance schedule for toxicity. The permittee should
work with Aquatic Toxicology to reduce toxocity (likely from chlorine). The permit should
contain THE language.
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

State of North Carolina
Department of Lnvironment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Ann B. Orr
lonathan R Howes, Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 18, 1993
i
t`
Mr. Vito Montaperto
Dana -Hill Corporation _MAY 2 Q 1993
925 Dana Road
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792 dei�eei;im ,
o
Subject: R newal of NPDES Permit
Dana -Hill Corporation
NPDES Permit Number
NCO073393
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Montaperto:
Thank you for your reply concerning justification for maintaining
a permitted flow of 42,000 gallons per day. It is currently proposed
that your renewed permit have separate effluent limitations pages for
10,000 gallons per day and for 42,000 gallons per day. As we
discussed by telephone, additional treatment facilities for continuous
flow measurement, dechlorination, and ammonia reduction, as well as
for treatment capacity will be necessary for expansion.
As per our conversation, you were given the choice of selecting a
numerical ammonia limit or a toxicity testing requirement to add to
your NPDES Permit for the 10,000 gallon per day effluent limitations
page. This letter confirms that you have selected the ammonia limits
of 11 mg/l summer and 32 mg/1 winter.
By copy of this letter, I am also informing our Technical
Services Support Group in Raleigh of your choice so that they may make
the appropriate change to your permit.
Interchanw Building, 59 WI(xxllin Place. Asheville. NC 28901 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oprxmuniry Af innative Action Fniplover

Vito Montaperto
May 18, 1993
Page Two
If you have any further questions or comments regarding your
responsibilities pertaining to this additional requirement, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 704/251-6208 Thank you for your
cooperation.
xc:
Technical Services
Charles M. Lowe
Sincerely,
-Paa � a) LtL
Paul R. White, P. E.
Environmental Engineer

DANA-HILL CORPORATION
DANA-HILL CORPORATION
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
0.2
7010 (CFS)
0.2
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.042
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.042
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0651
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0651
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
24.56
IWC (%)
24.56
Allowable Concentration (ug/1)
69.23
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
3.40
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
0.3
Fecal Limit
200 /100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.042
(based on 331 : 1)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.0651
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
17.83
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
9.08
NCO073393 4/20/93

LIST OF 100% DOMESTIC FACILITIES
WHICH ARE RENEWING WITHOUT MODIFICATION RECEIVED 12/92
Permit #
Facility
Stream
Sub -basin County
Region MOD Comments
20443
COLUMBIA WWI?, TOWN OF
SCUPPERNONG RIVER
030153
TYRRELL
WaRO FK
24775
WARREN CO WELCOME CENTER I-85
BLUE MUD CREEK
030207
WARREN
RRO FK stream is now WS
27685
NCDOC/AVERY PRISON UNIT
THREE MILE CREEK
040306
AVERY
ARO JMN
29220
CMUD / MCDOWELL PARK WWTP
LAKE WYLIE / CATAWBA RIVER
030834
MECKLENBURG MRO JMN addl monitoring and BPJ limits
31470
COOPER'S RANCH MHP
JUMPING RUN CREEK
030614
HARNETT
FRO JCD 3
35041
CWS/HEMBY ACRES
NORTH FORK OF CROOKED CREEK
030712
UNION
MRO MMW
35076
OAK SUMMIT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
UT MILL CREEK
030704
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW Ob (7/l/94)
35084
SEDGE GARDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL UT FIDDLERS CREEK
030704
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW Ob (7/l/94)
35106
VIENNA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
UT TOMAHAWK CREEK
030704
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW Ob (7/l/94)
35297
NORTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
UT GRASSY CREEK
030704
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW Ob (711194)
35572
PRINCE IBRAHAM INTERMED SCHOOL
UT MILL CREEK
030704
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW Ob (711/94)
37231
BEAR GRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
UT TURKEY SWAMP
030306
MARTIN
WaRO JCD 4 & Zero -flow stream
40339
NRCD-BILT CORPENING FORESTRY
LINVILLE RIVER
030830
AVERY
ARO JMN 4 & Add Fecal Monitoring
43257
NATURE TRAIL M 4P
CUB CREEK
030606
CHATHAM
RRO JCD
45896
NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES, INC.
RICHLAND CREEK
030402
WAKE
RRO FK 4
50610
105 PLACE SOUTH
WATAUGA RIVER
040201
WATAUGA
WSRO JMN
51071
REDWOOD ACADEMY
UT LITTLE LICK CREEK
030401
DURHAM
RRO FK 4 (Zero -flow stream wn & 2 limits.)
55212
AUMAN'S MHP
RICH FORK
030707
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW 2 facility is well operated & maintained
56821
TANGLEWOOD FARMS WWTP
YADKIN RIVER
030702
FORSYTH
WSRO MMW public sewer available
56952
POLLARD ENTERPRISES/BLUE CREEK
NEW RIVER
030502
ONSLOW
WiRO MMW permittee write notice to connect etc.
58939
NAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME, INC
UT SECOND CREEK
030704
ROWAN
MRO MMW Oa facility under order
63398
SYCAMORE CREEK COMPANY
SYCAMORE CREEK
030402
DURHAM
RRO FK 4
73211
EDGEWOOD NURSING CENTER
FLOYDS CREEK
030802
RUTHERFORD
ARO JMN
73334
JOAN WHITMIRE NW
UT ALLEN BRANCH
040302
HENDERSON
ARO JMN 4
73393
MONTAPERTO ENTERPRISES, INC.
UT DEVILS FORK CREEK
040302
HENDERSON
ARO JMN 4 & 1
KEYS TO COMMENTS:
Oa. No policy given. Alternatives analysis should be required.
Ob. Facility must meet 5 & 1 (by date given in parenthesis).
Oc. Alternatives analysis requested.
Od. Alternatives analysis submitted.
Oe. Facility will connect to POTW.
1. Phased permit.
2. Documented instream water quality problems.
3. Facility is requesting modification.
4. WLA should be done per basinwide permitting schedule.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO073393
PEp-WrME NAME: Dana -Hill Corporation
FACILITY NAME: Dana -Hill Corporation WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Minor _q
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.010 MGD 0 , a 4 Z
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
100 %
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Devil's Fork
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: f-9-NW F 9 S W (please attach)
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/95 Treatment Plant Class: II
Classification changes within three miles:
No chance
Requested by: Jay Lucas Date: 3121/95
Prepared by: Date: ,$
Reviewed by: /; ate: 5
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
SM tJ
3 z 5 s
a z.-?
3)
Drainage Area (mi`) Q, Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) o, z Winter 7Q10 (cfs) p. 3 30Q2 (cfs),0,
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream
Location
Downstream Location
a
Characteristics
Rcc=mendkd Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (STJ1 -.
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Comments:
Summer I Winter
Monthly Average
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Summer
Winter
0.01
0.01
.042
0.042
30
30
30
30
11
monitor
3.4
9.0
NL
NL
NL
NL
30
30
30
30
200
200
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
28
28
`fs_�
a

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Dana -Hill Corp. WWTP
NCO073393
100% Domestic
Existing
Renewal
UT to Devils Fork
C
04-03-02
Henderson
Asheville
Jay Lucas
3/21/95
F9NW
F95W
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Request #
8277 (A&B)
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC @ 0.01 MGD:
IWC @ 0.042 MGD:
Region HA 10
Equation
5/23/95
0.7
0.2
0.3
1.2
0.4
7.2 %
25 %
At last renewal permittee requested modification to lower design flow to 0.01 MGD and chose
NH3N limits over WET test requirement. NH3N and Residual Chlorine limits were added to
0.042 MGD as new flow. All strearnflows are up to date with current USGS methods, and all
permit limits are up to date with current Division Procedures. Permit should be renewed
with existing limits. Renewal could have been streamlined. Facility's recent compliance
record has been poor with 3 monthly avg. BOD violations, 6 TSS viola ' ns and 2 NH3N
violations from 9/94 to 2/95.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewe
Recommended by.
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
�-- ZZ' G I �. Date: ' 2V,5
Date: S/,XAS'
Date: 1
r'
g: Date• /r
J UN 2 g 1995
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
TP (mg/1):
IN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
0.01
0.01
30
30
11
32
NL
NL
30
30
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
.042
0.042
30
30
3.4
9.0
NL
NL
30
30
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
28
28
Monthly Average
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Summer
Winter
WQ or EL
0.01
0.01
.042
0.042
30
30
30
30
EL
11
732; rnot.r 3.4
9.0
WQ
NL
NL
NL
NL
30
30
30
30
EL
200
200
200
200
EL
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
EL
monitor
monitor
28
28
EL
Limits Changes Due To: NONE
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instrearn data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Parameter(s) Affected
Parameter(s) are water quality limited For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: NONE
Downstream Location: NONE
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
AAd quacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics analysis, modeling analysis if
modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

0
,P
4� L
J56,f
A)

q *1
X6
zir
7
h �13
j r�

H
U56 X&,

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION: Jay Lucas
DATE: March 29, 1995
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY Henderson
PERMIT NUMBER NCO073393
'
�4rQ5
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
Facility and Address: Dana Hill Community
925 Dana Road
Hendersonville, N. C, 28792
Date of Investigation: March 15, 1995
Report Prepared By: Paul White
Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Vito Montaperto
704-692-8477
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 1525 (Dana Road)
and SR 1893, 1.5 miles SE of I-26/Hwy 64 interchange, proceed east
on SR 1525 for 0.1 mile to the entrance on the south side of the
road. The wastewater treatment plant is 0.4 mile south of the
entrance. The discharge point is 300 feet east of the treatment
plant.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 19' 23" Longitude: 820 24' 57"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. F9,?94 U.S.G.S. Quad Name Hendersonville
FA5%4
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? yes
Yes No If No, explain:
Page 1

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
not in flood plain.
2 - 7% slopes,
9. Location of nearest dwelling: >100 feet
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed tributary to
Devil's.Fork.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: French Broad 040302
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Stream drains agricultural land. 7Q10 = 0.2 cfs.
Heavily silted and vegetation removed from banks
periodically.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted 0.042 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity) --
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? 0.042 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current
design capacity 10,000 GPD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years:
NONE A/C will be necessary for expansion.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Existing
treatment facilities consist of an influent pump station, a
2900 gallon equalization basin with bar screen, a 2000 gallon
sludge holding tank, a 10,000 gallon aeration basin with
return sludge, a 2200 gallon, 36 square foot clarifier with a
4.5 ft. effluent weir; a 240 gallon chlorine contact chamber
with tablet chlorinator, V-notch weir, and gravity outfall
line. No continuous recording flow meter or cascade aerator
was installed. Water meter readings can suffice for total
flow at current plant capacity. This information was
gathered from on site measurements. No certification of
construction has been received.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: n/a
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Chlorine, ammonia,
household chemicals.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): n/a
in development approved
should be required not needed
Page 2

2.. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: None
specified. Contract operator typically contracts with a septage
hauler to pump the sludge and transport to the City of
• Hendersonville WWTP.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit Number
Residuals Contractor
Telephone Number
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP OTHER
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): II
4. SIC Codes (s) : 4952
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities
i.e., non -contact cooling water discharge from a metal plating
company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 05 Secondary 08
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0607
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds
or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? no
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
none
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) none
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all
of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional
perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: Technically feasible on adjacent farmland.
Page 3

Connection to Regional Sewer System:.None available.
Subsurface: Not likely to be economically feasible for permitted
flow.
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The existing permit allows 0.042 MGD. However A/C and
existing plant is for 0.010 MGD. Current flows at the facility,
which is in the initial stages of development, are in the range of
1000 - 2000 GPD. The permittee submitted justification for flow
in 1993 when the permit was renewed.
The permit should be renewed.
- &a� �1��
Signature of Report Preparer
W ter Qualit Regional Supervisor
c� � 1 /6—
Dat
P
Page 4