WI0400182_APPLICATION FOR PERMIT_20110325

State of North Carolina REC;BVED I DENR.1 DV4
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ar4uif`z0 rJ `1 .t, -,o `ection
Division of Water Quality 4vt ,;ti `:; 11
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
■ Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being retumed.
Application Number (to be completed 6y DWQ): \N;j t4 C)Q IS"
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): USI Realty Corporation
2. Signing Official's Name*: William B. Demeritt Title: President
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: 13925 City Center Drive. Suite 200
City: Chino Hills State: CA Zip: 91709
Telephone number: 949-247-2033 Fax number:
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant):
5. Property Owner's mailing address:
City:
State: Zip:
G. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Reinhard Ruhmke Title: Managing Geologist
Company: Brown and Caldwell
Address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 320
City:__ RaleiZh State: NC Zip: 27607
Telephone number: 919-233-9178 Fax number: 919-233-0144
Email Address: [e-mail]
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: ( New ( Modification of existing permit ( Renewal of existing permit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & II only, sign the certification on the last page of this
forth, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 1 of 7

0
C.
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A rr c,LL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type ST Wells — Tracer Injection
INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: Former Ingram Plywood
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 718 Bassett Drive
City: Thomasville County:
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
Davidson
State: NC Zip: 27360
1. Describe the source of the contamination: Ingram Plywood Inc. manufactured shaped plywood products at
the Site from 1953 to 1990 by combining wood materials with adhesive. The adhesive consisted of urea
formaldehyde resin and an aluminum sulfate activator that reacted when mixed to form a full
polymerized urea formaldehyde resin. The resin was disposed in an area behind the manufacturing
building. Nitrate was formed as a degradation product from the resin.
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Based on the NCDENR approval letter for the Corrective Action Plan, the constituents of concern are
nitrate nitrite ammonia and total k'eldahi nitrogen TKN .
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
(x Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness
0.17 feet
( No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site:
ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
( UST Section (x Suaerfund Section (includine REC Program and DSCA sites)
( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ( Solid Waste Section
( Hazardous Waste Section ( Other:
5. Incident managers name: Janet MacDonald and phone number [phone] _!
6. Incident numberor other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
NONCDO001202
PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: NIA
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits: N1.
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits: NIA
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: NIA
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T Page 2 of 7

1W
APPLICATION FOR PERma F TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A ., uLL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — to Situ Groundwater Rennediation / Type 5T Wells -- Tracer Injection
[V. INJECTION DATA
INJECTION FLUID DATA
1. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE. Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiolo8y Section (DEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants •rants or contact the UIC Program to determine rf
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES
Injectant: i % milk solution in water
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 1 %
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant.
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
{ None
{x Municipal water supply
{ Groundwater from private well or any well within c/a mile of injection site
{ Air
( Other:
3. If any well within r/a mile of injection site. a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply
the following information:
a. iLocation/11) number of source: N/A
b. Depth of source:
Formation:
d. Rock/Sediment type:
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well. including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE_ If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must apply far a closed -loop groundwater rernediation permit using 0i2lication form
G WRS.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 3 of 7

t` J
APPLICATION FOR PEk,vitz T TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A . , LLL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Reniediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
S. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: 8 hours
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: I
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 8 hours
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): NIA
2, Injection rate per well: I gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume, 480 gallons per day (gpd): gallons per event (if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: 24 pounds/square inch (psi)
S. Temperature at point of injection: Ambient "F
6, Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: During injection, a pressure
gauge and now meter will be used to monitor injection pressure and flow rate. _
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: Unknown gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
( Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
(x Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Geologic Exploration, Inc.
NC Well Contractor Certification number: 3098
3. Date to be constructed: May 2011 Number of borings: 1
Approximate depth of each boring (
4, Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: 10 to 25 feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth),
5. Well casing (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: (x PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:_
Casing depth: 0 to 25 ft.
6. Grout (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: (x Cement ( Bentonite ( Other.
Grout depth: 0 to 6 ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-515T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PEIuvuT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A „� LL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
V. ATTACHMENTS
'rovide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings:
A. SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
NOTE: G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the
public welfare or .safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or documents involving geologic work prepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be .signed and sealed ky the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1) the regional geologic setting:
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters: and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical, physical, biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant. Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet (MSDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within'/a mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials:
(2) operation procedures;
") a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
l a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6109 UIC-5I/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PEluvitT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A :LL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
R MONITORING PLAN
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used:
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
NOTE: The .selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by-
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring Parameters .should include the target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other
parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within'/a mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandonment record, if available.
H. MAPS
Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary;
c- existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within 1/4 mile of the injection. well or well system:
e. all surface water bodies within'/e mile of the injection well or well system; and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within'/e mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed
injection Tone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection
wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross -sections) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including:
a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
Revised 6/09 UIC-5115T Page. 6 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A rr rJLL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
RECEIVED / DEUa / D�
I. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent} qulfer Frnto,•Ir:t� Serfia�
NCAC 15A 2C .021 l(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows: MA "5
1, for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3, for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein. and that. based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate. and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and Title: Reinhard Ruhmke, F.G.. Managing Geologist for grown and Caldwell. on behalf of USI
3123/1 1
V111. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
(" C]wner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated. I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200).
Printed Name and Title: NIA
Signature:
Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T Page 7 of 7

1W
USI Realty Corp.
13925 City Center Drive
Suite #200
China Hills, CA 91709
March 17, 2011
To Whom it may concern:
USI Realty Corporation is submitting this letter that authorizes Brown and Caldwell to
obtain, on our behalf, an injection permit for the property located at 718 Bassett Drive,
Thomasville, North Carolina. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Reinhard Ruhmke from Brown and Caldwell at [phone] or me at 909-247-2033.
Thank you in advance for your time,
Sincerely,
�A*alwt 4
William Demerat
President
USI Realty Corporation
Cc: Reinhard Ruhmke, Brown and Caldwell

ATTACHMENT A
SITE HISTORY
Description of the site history is summarized in the RI Work Plan and the RI Report, both of which are
included in Attachment A.

North Carolina neparunent of F'nvrronment
and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
Inactive Hazardous Snes Branch
REGISTERED SITE MANAGER DOCUMENT CIERTIEICAT] ON STATEMENT t.4306(b)(1)):
"I certify under penalty of law that 1 am personally familiar with the information contained in
this submittal, including any and all supporting documents accompanying this certification, and
that the material and information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate and complete and complies with the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act G.S.
130A-310. et seq, and the remedial action program Rules 15A NCAC 13C .0300. 1 am aware
that there are significant penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete
information."
Qlek+n ha � Avg M k—,(
(Name of Registered Site Manager)
* VAa2-C- * �/ 1
(Signature of Registered Site Manager) Date
(Enter State)
W pt (--e— COUNTY
i, w- , a Notary Public of said County and State, do
hereby certify t -pi_Y did personally appear and sign
before me this day, produced proper identification in the form of djny-
was duly sworn or affirmed, and declared that, he or she is the duly authorized
environmental consultant of the remediating parry of the property referenced above and
that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, after thorough investigation, the
information contained in the above certification is true and accurate, and he or she then
signed this Certification in my presence.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this !li �— day of f IM �tv
ary Publi signature}
My commission expires: 4-a2D - d"
Document Cerlifrcnlion Form No. DC -11
'F1NL SEAL)
011
r
".11G`'�G
linty;

5410 Trinity Road
Suite 320
Raleigh, INC 27607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.browna ndca Idwell,com
September 15. 2010
Mr. Kim Caulk
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1646
Subject: Workplan to complete Phase II Remediai Investigation
Former Ingram Plywood Site,
718 Bassett Drive
Thomasville, North Carolina
GW Incident # 85037
Dear Mr. Caulk,
0n behalf of U S I Realty Corporation (USI), Brown and Caldwell (BC) is submittingthis
Remedial Investigation Workplan (Workplan) to the North Carolina Department of Envi-
ronment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) to complete the remedial investigation at the
former Ingram Plywood Inc. (Ingram) property located at 718 Bassett Drive, Thomasville,
California (Site) (Figure 1). The Workplan proposes a scope of work to further investigate
the extent of nitrates in soil and groundwater beneath the Site. The objective of the
investigation is to complete the remedial investigation so that groundwater remedial
alternatives can be evaluated.
Background
The Site encompasses approximately 4 acres of fand and contained three buildings; a
4 7.7 05 square -foot (ft2) manufacturing building, a 16,000 ft2 warehouse and printing
building, and a 1,000 ft2 office building (Figure 2). Ingram Plywood Inc. manufactured
shaped ptywood products at the Site from 1953 to 1990 by combining wood materials
with adhesive. The adhesive consisted of urea formaldehyde resin and an aluminum
sulfate activator that reacted when mixed to form a fully polymerized urea formaldehyde
resin (URS 2003). All the buildings have been removed and the Site is now vacant land
(URS 2003).
Prior investigations
Environmental activities have been conducted at the Site since 1985. The environmental
activities conducted at the Site included: investigation of the resin -impacted area, the
manufacturing area, print shop, and underground storage tank (UST) locations. Remedia-
tion activities at the Site included: soil excavation at the resin -impacted area, print shop
area, former UST locations, manufacturing areas, free product recovery systems, and
nitrate contaminated groundwater extraction and discharge. A summary of prior assess-
ment and remedial activities was provided in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (URS 2003).
The results of assessment and remedial activities include the following:
\\dcra102�projects\USI Realty Corfformer Ingram Plywood\139598Workplan Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan final,dom

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 2
1. One 2,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank (UST) and one 8,000-gallon #2
fuel oil UST were removed in 1989. Approximately 35 tons of impacted soil was re-
moved and disposed offsite. A `No further action' (NFA) status for the USTs was
granted by NCDENR in May 2000 (Case # 5539),
2. One 550-gallon heating oil UST was removed m 1994. Approximately 14 tons of
impacted soil was removed and disposed offsite. NFA status for the USTs was granted
by NCDENR in December 1999 (Case # 12840),
3. In October 1991, Sections A and 8 of the Manufacturing Building were demolished.
Approximately 1,700 tons of petroleum -impacted soil (108' x 56') were removed from
the Manufacturing/UST Area and disposed offsite. Groundwater remediation using
petroleum recovery systems (two trenches) and 'Aggressive Fluid Vapor Recovery' was
conducted. NFA status for the ManufacturinglUST Area was granted by NCDENR in
May 2000 (Case # 5539).
4, In October 1991, the resin -impacted area [-16,000 square feet (ft2)] was also exca-
vated to a depth of approximateiy 1-foot below ground surface (bgs). Approximately
900 cubic yards (yds3) of impacted soil was removed and disposed offsite.
5. 1n October 1991, approximately 28 yds-3of impacted soil was removed from the print
shop loading dock area. An area of approximately 375 ft2 was excavated to a depth
between 1.5 and 2-feet bgs and the soil disposed offsite.
6. A groundwater recovery system for nitrate removal was installed in July 1994 and
consisted of two recovery wells (RW-2 and RW-3). Operation ceased in late 1996 after
removal of approximately 468,600 gallons.
7. In March 1999, approximately 26 tons of formaldehyde -impacted soil was excavated
in the vicinity of SB19. This impacted area was discovered during confirmation soil
borings and appeared to be a small area containing hardened resins and other debris.
S. A water -well survey was performed in October 1999. The survey identified three wells
within 1,500 feet of the Site. Two of the wells were no longer being used and a third
well served two residences on the Dill property. These three wells were abandoned
and the houses on the Dill property were connected to the City of Thomasville water
system.
9. A soil-to-groundwatervaIue of 38.86 miIIigrarns per kilogram (mglkg) for formatde-
hyde was calculated. The highest residual formaldehyde concentration was 148.26
mg/kg in boring SB-16. It was determined that the potential impact to groundwater
from the residual formaldehyde concentrations was negligible. NCDENR agreed with
this conclusion in correspondence dated April 14, 2003. Formaldehyde was not de-
tected in groundwater in the November 2000 sampling event.
10. A CAP for remediation of nitrate in groundwater was submitted by URS in March 2003.
The selected groundwater remedy was Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) to reduce
nitrate concentrations in groundwater to below the NCDENR 2L standard of 10 milli-
grams per Liter (mglL). The CAP was approved by NCDENR in correspondence dated
May 24, 2004. Based on the NCDENR CAP approval letter, the constituents of con-
cern (CQCs) are nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN).
11. Groundwater monitoring wells MW-5, MW-6, MW-10, MW-19, RW-2, PMW-7, and
PMW-8 (Figure 2) are sampled annually as part of the MINA program along with three
stream locations. Groundwater samples are analyzed for nitrate, nitrite, ammonia,
and TKN.
\\bcra102\projects\USl Realty Corfformer Ingram Plywood\139598_Workplan Prep\Workpian\final WP\USI
Workplan final.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 3
12. Based on the most recent annual groundwater sampling event (December 2009)
groundwater flaw is in a southerly direction and nitrate was detected above the
NCDENR 2L standard in monitoring wells MW-19 (18.9 mg/Q, MW-6 (59.7 mg/Q, and
MW-10 (58.7 mg/Q (Figure 2). Nitrates were not detected above the NCDENR nitrate
standard in downgradient welts PMW-7 (0.38 mg/L) and PMW-8 (0.29 mg,/L) (Table
1). URS stated that the nitrate groundwater plume remains stable (URS 2010). Ni-
trates were detected at 0.65 mglL, 0.65 mglL, and 0.62 mg/L in the upstream,
downgradient, and downstream surface water sample Locations, respectively. These
concentrations do not exceed the NCDENR surface water standard for nitrate. The
analytical results of the stream samples indicate the stream has not been impacted by
nitrate -contaminated groundwater that may originate frorn thle Site and discharges to
the stream (URS 2010).
REC Program
0n March 11. 2008, US signed an administrative agreement {Agreement} to enter the
NCDENR Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) program, a voluntary remedial action
program. The Agreement outlines a schedule to complete the voluntary remedial program
as outlined in N.C.G.S. 130A-310.9(c), 15A NCAC 13C .0300, and the Registered Envi-
ronmental Consultant Program Implementation Guidance of the NCENR Division of Waste
Management (NCDENR 2008).
Under the Agreement, the remedial investigation report is due by March 11, 2011.
Data Needs to Complete Remedial Investigation
As described previously, a significant amount of Site characterization data already has
been collected. Historic releases to soil and groundwater beneath the Site have been
largely characterized and remediated. Tasks that are necessary to complete the remedial
investigation as outlined in the REC program (NCDENR 2009) are provided below.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas. The site and adjacent properties will be evaluated for
the existence of the environmentally sensitive areas listed below:
• State Parks
• Areas Important to Maintenance of Unique Natural Communities
• Sensitive Areas identified Under the National Estuary Program
• Designated State Natural Areas
• State Seashore, Lakeshore and River Recreational Areas
• Rare Species (state and federal Threatened and Endangered)
• Sensitive Aquatic Habitat
• State Wild and Scenic Rivers
• National Seashore, Lakeshore and River Recreational Areas
• National Parks or Monuments
• Federal Designated Scenic or Wild Rivers
• Designated and Proposed Federal Wilderness and Natural Areas
• National Preserves and Forests
• Federal Land designated for the Protection of Natural Ecosystems
• State -Designated Areas for Protection or Maintenance of Aquatic Life
\\bcral02\projects\05l Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood \139598_Workpfa n Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan final.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 4
• State Preserves and Forests
• Terrestrial Areas Utilized for Breeding by Large or Dense Aggregations of Animals
• National or State Wildlife Refuges
• Marine Sanctuaries
• National and State Historical Sites
• Areas identified Under Coastal Protection Legislation
• Coastal Barriers or Units of a Coastal Barrier Resources System
• Spawning Areas Critical for the Maintenance of Fish/SheIIfish
• Species within River. Lake or Coastal Tidal Water
• Migratory Pathways and Feeding Areas Critical for Maintenance of Anadromous Fish
Species within River Reaches or Areas in Lakes or Coastal Tidal Waters in Which Such
Fish Spend extended Periods of Time
• State Lands Designated for Wildlife or Game Management
• Wetlands
The results of this evaluation will be provided in the remedial investigation report (Report)
Based on the information collected to date, the remaining COCs for the Site are nitrate,
nitrate, ammonia, and TKN. To complete the investigation of these CCCs in anticipation of
potential remediation activities, some additional investigation data are planned as
presented below.
Geochemical Data. Ideally, nitrate degradation (denitrification) snows a sequential
breakdown of NO3 --+ NO2 --+ N0 — N20 --+N2. Denitrification in groundwater generally
occurs best in an anaerobic [dissolved oxygen {DO) c 2 mg/Q environment with the pH
being neutral to slightly alkaline (USEPA 2007), Groundwater samples have been ana-
lyzed for select geochemicaI parameters (e.g., DO, pH, specific conductance, etc.) to
evaluate potential nitrate fate mechanisms such as denitrification. A review of groundwa-
ter data collected duringthe January 2010 annual sampling event showed that DO
concentrations ranged from a high of 9.45 mg/L in MW-19 to a low of 0.16 mg/L in MW-6.
General pH conditions within the plume appear to be mildly acidic (average pH - 5) (URS
2010). Analyses of groundwater samples for additional MNA parameters such as dis-
solved gasses (i.e. nitrogen), total organic carbon (TOC), iron, manganese, sulfate, and
phosphate are planned to further evaluate the denitrification processes at the Site.
Groundwater Screening Investigation. In order to gather additional information for a
potential future groundwate► remedial design, the late raI extent of nitrate impacts to
groundwater needs further refinement. Additional groundwater sampling in the vicinity of
the wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 will further refine the dimensions of the nitrate
plume. Slugtests will also be conducted in wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 to gather
additional hydrogeologic data related to groundwater velocity.
In addition, soil samples may be collected for geotechnical analyses for use in a fate and
transport assessment. The geotechnical samples may be analyzed for total organic
carbon, bulk density, porosity, permeability, and density. Some soil samples may also be
analyzed for nitrate and/or formaldehyde.
Pilot Test. A groundwater remedial pilot test will be performed to evaluate the effective-
ness of in situ treatment of the nitrate -impacted groundwater. The pilot test will consist of
injecting a carbon substrate (i.e. vegetable oil, cheese whey, etc.) into the groundwater.
\\bcra102\projects\USl Realty Corfformer Ingram Plywood\139598_Workplan Prep\Workplan\fnaI WP\USI
Workplan final,docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 5
The carbohydrates are readily degraded by indigenous heterotrophic microorganisms that
are typically present in the aquifer. This metabolic degradation process utilizes the
available DO contained in the groundwater, and drives the aquifer system to a more
anaerobic and reduced state, thus enhancing denitrification. The performance of this
enhancement is measured by monitoring for nitrate reductions and relative concentra-
tions of degradation end -products (nitrogen gas), degradation byproducts (nitrite), as well
as other indicator parameters in groundwater such as DO and oxidation/reduction (redox)
potential (ORP). The pilot test will demonstrate this technology and provide information
for development of design criteria for full-scale remediation of nitrate in groundwater
beneath this Site, as needed.
Proposed Field Activities
Implementation of this Workplan will accomplish the objectives of refining the subsurface
characterization of the former Ingram Plywood Site by gathering field data and interpreting
such data so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding potential future ground-
water remedial options, thus completing the remedial investigation. Unless otherwise
referenced, field activities will follow guidelines provided in Brown and Caldwell's Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPS) which can be provided upon request. All field work will be
performed under a Site -specific health and safety plan and supervised by an appropriate
North Carolina licensed professional. The data collected during the field activities will be
provided in the Report. Major field tasks will include:
• Drilling borings and collecting soil and groundwater samples from the borings to further
refine the delineation of nitrate -impacts.
• Perform a groundwater remediation pilot test to determine whether the addition of a
carbon source will stimulate the biological degradation of nitrate.
• Sampling, analysis, and interpretation of water quality in these borings and existing
groundwater monitoring wells.
Groundwater Screening
BC proposes to perform a screening of groundwater quality using a Hydropuncho or
similar sampling tool to further refine the extent of nitrate -impacted groundwater in the
vicinity of the former resin excavation (Figure 3). A minimum of four borings will be
installed using a direct -push rig and groundwater samples will be collected. Figure 4
shows the proposed sample locations.
A Hydropunch@ or similar sampling device will be advanced into the water -bearing zone at
each sampling location and a groundwater sample collected. The grab groundwater
samples will be analyzed for nitrate. Following completion of groundwater sampling
activities, each boring will be backfilled with a cement/bentonite grout mixture. The
results of this screening evaluation will be used to further refine the extent of nitrate -
impacted groundwater above the NCDENR 2L, of 10 mg/L in anticipation of a possible
future design of an in situ groundwater remedial system.
Slug -testing will be performed on wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19. Slug -test procedures
will follow NCDENRs slug -test guidelines (NCDENR 2007). Each boring location will be
surveyed by a land surveyor licensed by the State of North Carolina. Survey plats will meet
the requirements of N.C.G.S. 47-30.
\\bc ra 102 \projects \U S I Realty Corp\Former Ingram P1ywcod\139598_Workplan Prep\Workp la n \fi na I WP\USI
Workplan final.doex

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 5
Pilot Test
The pilot test will be performed near wells MW-5, MW-10 and MW-19 which currently
contain nitrate concentrations above NCDENR 2L Standards.
The objectives for the proposed pilot test are to
• Determine if the selected technology can reduce the nitrate impacts to below the
NCDENR 2L Standard of 10 mg/L;
• Determine whether daughter products are farmed that are not further treated by the in
situ treatment; and
• Generate information useful for developing the design for full-scale treatment.
Prior to initiating the pilot test, two injection monitoring points will be installed in the
vicinity of well MW-19. These monitoring points will be installed at distances of approx-
imately 10 and 20 linear feet downgradient from the well (Figure 5). The data collected
from these monitoring points will assist in determining the radius of influence (R01) of the
injection, The monitoring points will consist of 1-inch schedule 40 PVC with the screened
interval extending from approximately 5-20 feet bgs and will be installed using a direct -
push drill.
The carbon substrate proposed for injection will be delivered in appropriate storage
containers (i.e. 55-gallon drums) and will likely be diluted ❑nsite to be between 1 and 10
percent solution. The type of carbon substrate used will be based on the results of the
groundwater screening discussed previously. To promote biologically enhanced denitrifi-
cation, the carbon -containing liquid solution will be injected through temporary injection
points (1P) installed using a direct -push drill rig. The solution will be injected utilizing a
trailer -mounted system consisting of the following main components: 1] drum transfer
pumps and flow meter systems for transferring reagents into a mix tank, 2) a 300-gallon
capacity mix tank and mixer to prepare batches of solution prior to injecting, 3) a centri-
fugal pump system including a variable frequency device to control the pumping rate to
between 1 and 10 gallons per minute (gpm) with an injection pressure ranging up to 20
psi, and 4) manifolds to safely and efficiently transfer the solution into the IP.
Gasoline- or diesel -powered electrical generators and compressors will be used on -Site to
operate chemical mixers and injection pumps. Water far mixing the solution will be
delivered to the Site by truck or pumped from a well installed in the aquifer in a clean area
outside of the impacted groundwater.
The solution will be injected into the aquifer through temporary injection points con-
structed of PVC piping. We anticipate that a 15-foot long screened PVC casing will be
installed at each injection point with the screened -interval located between approximately
5 to 15 feet below the water table. The depth to water ranges between 4 and 11 feet bgs
(URS 2010).
For this pilot test, the initial R01 of each of the three injection points at each well is
estimated to be 5 feet. The pilot test layout is presented in Figure 5.
The pilot test will likely consist of the injection of several hundred or more gallons of
solution per injection we11. The solution can be injected at flow rates from one to 10 or 20
gallons per minute (gpm) at pressures ranging from just a few pounds per square inch
(psi) up to pressures of 35 psi. Injection of solutions will be followed by injection of clean
water to flush one or mare system components including the mixing tank, the pump and
the injection piping and hoses.
\\bcra102\projects\USI Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood \139598_Workplan Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan final.dou

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Pa ge 7
BC personnel will collect pre-treatment groundwater samples from MW-6, MW-10, and
MW-19. These groundwater samples will be sent to a State -Certified laboratory for
analysis of nitrate by USEPA Method 353.2, nitrite by USEPA Method 3OO.0, ammonia by
USEPA Method 350.1. and TKN by USEPA Method 351.2 and total organic carbon (TOC).
The reduced forms of manganese (Mn+2) and iron (Fe+2) will be monitored in the field
with Hach kits. Water quality parameters of pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen. and ORP
will be measured in the field via a Horiba U-22 (or equal).
Monitoring
Monitoring associated with the pilot testing includes monitoring during the solution
injections and the post -treatment monitoring (note that baseline monitoring was included
previously).
Post -treatment sampling events will be scheduled at least one (1), three (3), six (6), and
12 weeks following the completion of the injections.
Monitoring During Injection. During solution injections, the following parameters will be
periodically monitored at wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 to provide real time information
about performance and ensure the safety of field personnel:
1. Water quality parameters including pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and ORP (via a
water quality analyzer - e.g., Horiba U-22),
2. Groundwater elevation (via an interface probe), and
3. visual observations for solution in wells (Using clear bailer).
Additionally, the following process data wtll be recorded:
1. injection pump flow rate,
2. Injection pump discharge pressure.
3. IP manifold pump side pressure,
4. IP manifold I side pressure,
5. Total mix tank batch injection time,
6. Total volume of solution injected; and
7. Water temperature at injection point.
At weeks 1, 3, 6, and 12, post -treatment groundwater samples will be collected from MW-
6. MW-10. and MW-19. These groundwater samples will be sent to a State -Certified
laboratory for analysis of nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, TKN, and TOC. The reduced forms of
manganese (Mn,2) and iron (Fei2) will be monitored in the field with Hach kits. Water
quality parameters of pH, temperature, DO, and ORP will be measured in the field via a
Horiba U-22 (or equal).
Groundwater Sampling
The current groundwater and stream sampling program, as outlined in the CAP (URS
2003) and the latest annual report (URS 2010). will continue and is sufficient to monitor
the plume stability. This program provides for annual sampling of six wells (MW-5, MW-6,
MW-10, MW-19, PMW-7, and PMW-8) (Figure 2) and the collection of three stream
samples. The samples are sent to a State of North Carolina Certified laboratory for
analysis of nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and TKN. Appropriate duplicate samples and field
blank samples will be collected for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes.
\\bcra102\projects\U51 Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood \139598_Workplan Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workpian final.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 8
As discussed previously, additional groundwater monitoring well sampling will be per-
formed as part of the picot test. The procedures for the annual groundwater monitoring
well sampling event as well as the pilot test are provided in the following section.
Sampling Methodology. Prior to sample collection, groundwater level measurements will
be collected in each well. After groundwater fevel measurements are collected, each well
will be purged with a down hole electric submersible pump using low -flow sampling
techniques similar to those described in the USEPA Low -Flow Groundwater Sampling
Procedures (USEPA 1996). This protocol provides for a higher degree of representative
samples to be collected and provides for more accurate measuring of specific groundwa-
ter parameters, especially in regard to the sensitive geochemicaI parameters to be
measured in this sampiIng event.
Groundwater samples will be collected from the wells listed in Table 2 directly from the
hose of the pump into laboratory -supplied containers with airtight septum seals. Samples
will be sealed, labeled, entered into chain -of -custody forms, placed in an ice -chilled cooler
(at as near to 4 degrees Celsius as practical), and delivered to the laboratory.
Monitor Wells
Proposed Analysts
MW5
Nitrate, MNA
MW-6
Nitrate, MNA
MW-10
Nitrate, MNA
MW-19
Nitrate, MNA
PMW-7
Nitrate
PMW-8
Nitrate
Nitrate = Inclodes Nitrate, Nitrite, Ammonia, and TXN
i4fNA = Monitored NaruraI Artenuation Parameters
Sample Analysis
All samples will be archived at the laboratory and may be analyzed for additional analytes
at a later time based on the initial results. All analytical Laboratories performing work will
be certified in the State of North Carolina. However, specialty labs that may be performing
the geotechnical analysis are generally not certified. Proposed analytical methods are
described in Table 3 below.
\\bCra102\projects\USI Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood\139598_Workplan Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan finai.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 9
Soil
Fractional Organic Carbon ASTM D2974 or equivalent
Selected samples from different Ilthologic units beneath the Site
ASTM D2937 or equivalent
Selected samples from different lithologic units beneath the Site
Moisture Content
ASTM D2216 or equivalent
Selected samples from different Ilthologic units beneath the Site to
confirm hand specimens
Grain Size
ASTM D422 or equivalent
Selected samples from different Ilthologic units beneath the Site to
confirm hand specimens
Permeability
API•RP40 or equivalent
Selected samples from different Ilthologic units beneath the Site
Formaldehyde
USEPA 510A or equivalent
Selected samples from different lithologic units beneath the Site
Nitrate
USEPA 9060 or equivalent
Selected samples from different lithologic units beneath the Site
Groundwater
Nitrate
USEPA 353.2
Regular groundwater sample collected through pump discharge hose.
Nitrite
USEPA 300.0
Regular groundwater sample collected through pump discharge hose.
THIN
USEPA 351.2
Rego largroundwater sample collected through pump discharge hose.
Ammonia
USEPA 350.1
Regulargroundwatersample collected through pump discharge hose.
Dissolved 0rganlc Carbon
USEPA 9060 orequfvalent
Regular groundwater sample collected through pump discharge hose
Dissolved Gasses (Nitrogen and
Carbon Dioxide)
AM20GAX
Rego largroundwatersample collected through pump discharge hose.
General Minerais/MNA
USEPA 6010/9056/310.2
Rego largroundwater sample collected through pump discharge hose.
Report
Upon completion of the field work, a remedial investigation report will be prepared and
submitted to NCDENR. The Report will include investigative methodologies, boring logs, a
summary of analytical results in tabular format, a site plan with sample locations, Plat of
Survey, and a copy of analytical results. The Report will also include the data from the
pilot test including the following:
1. A narrative summary of the pilot test activities;
2. A summary of the solution injected at each I and the time duration required to inject
the solution;
3. Groundwater sampling results from the pre-treatment (i.e., baseline) and post-
treatment will be tabulated;
4. A discussion as to whether the field pilot test confirms the applicability of bioenhanced
denitrification;
5. Monitoring results obtained during the injection process will be tabulated and/or
graphed to evaluate the horizontal RDI; and
6. Process data results measured during the injection process will be tabulated and used
to establish the injection rates and pressures for a full-scale system.
\\bcra102\projects\USI Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood\139598_Workpian Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workpian final.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 10
Project Schedule
Implementation of the groundwater screening is planned for October 2410 with the
annual groundwater sampling event completed during the same mobilization. The pilot
test will be implemented following the annual sampling event. The pilot test will last
approximately 3 months. The Report will be submitted by March 2011.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 424-
1435. --- ---
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Reinhard Ruhmke, P.G.,
Managing Geologist
Attachments: Table 1
Figures 1-5
References
cc: USI Realty Corporation
C'4'4p�
SEAL
2
/'-��Z'Zz�
John C. Callihan
Managing Scientist
\\bcra102\projects\US1 Realty Corp\Former Ingram Plywood \13959$_Workplan Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan final.docx

Mr. Caulk
September 15, 2010
Page 11
References
URS 2003. Corrective Action: Plan for Nitrate Groundwater Contamination and Petroleum
Free Product. URS Group. Report dated March 2003.
URS 2010. 2009 Annual Monitoring Report. URS Group. Report dated February 2010.
USEPA 1996. Puls, R.W., and Barcelona, M.J., Low Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Groundwa-
ter Sampling Procedures, EPA Groundwater Issue, April 1996.
NCDENR 2007. Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Slug Tests and Pumping Tests
Policy. Memorandum dated May 31, 2007.
NCDENR 2008. Executed REC Administrative Agreement. Letter dated March 11, 2008.
NCDENR 2009. REC Program Implementation Guidance. Guidance dated October 2009.
USEPA 2007. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganic Contaminants in Ground Water,
Volume 2 - Assessment for Non -Radionuclides Including Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium,
Copper, Lead, Nickel, Nitrate, Perchlorate, and Selenium. EPA Document # EPA/600/13-
07/140 dated October 2007.
\\bcra102\projects\US1 Realty Corfformer Ingram Plywood\139598_Workpian Prep\Workplan\final WP\USI
Workplan final,doex

Table 1. Summary of Historical Analytical Results and Fleld Measurements
Former Ingram Plywood Facility
Thomasville, North Carolina
I Depth to Water
Well ID Sample Rate (BTOC)
Top of Casing (TOC) Water table Elevation
Elevation {feet] (feet
Nitrate
(mg/L)
Nitrite
(mg/Q
Total KJeldahl
Nitrogen (mg/L]
Ammonia
(mg/Lj
Specific
pH Conductance
[pH Units) IMVM)
Temperature
(•C)
Conductivity
(my)
Dissolved Oxygen Turbidity
(mgll) INTO)
Formaldehyde
Ifig/L)
MW-5
Nov-97
Dee-98
15.90 894.83
878.93
047
-
-
-
NO
Nov -DO
15.51
894.83
979.32
0.51
-
-
34D
17,50
520
1.69
1.1
NO
Sep-04
13.91
894.83
880.92
1.60
40.1<0.1
5.03
264
76.01
314
3.34
22.38
_
Dec-D4
14.11
894.83
W7-2
1.90
<0.1-toll
M-9WD
4.37
2"
18.42
381
0.68
11.70
Dec -CS
13.35
894.83
881.49
SSO
NO0.11
4.56
0.434
19.11
354
1.79
91
Dec-06
13.81
894.83
881.02
1.10
e0.007<O.OD3
4.97
0.374
17.56
319
7.75
5.1
Dec-07
16.03 B94.83
876.88
1.OD
4*.10
c0.10
4.94
198 19.37
0.42
7.66
15
Dec-oe
-
-
n.96
Jan-10 13.30 894.83 881.53 1.2 - <0,5 <D.lD 4.73 0.46 17.16 366 1.43 0 -
MW-u
Jan-92 -- - - 130 - -- - - - - - - _
Nov-97
_
_
_
_
-
_
_
-
_
_
_
0-%
Dec-98
11.30
877.32
866.01
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
19.0
Nov-00
1036
877.31
866.95
58.9
-
-
633
15.30
573
2.15
0
NO
r-S4-z
7A6
877.31
669.85
54,0
cO.1
11
20
4.35
512
17A2
344
6.38
10.02
Dec-04
12.93
877.31
868.28
52.0
0.0037J
9.70
21
5.15
794
I& D
294
D.80
93.20
Dec-05
525
877.31
872.05
60.0
0.12
23.00
17.OD
3.99
0.747
15.11
4D4
11100
122
-
Dec-06
6.48
877.31
1113
42.0
cO.007
SS.00
16
4,12
0,587
]4.15
396
4.30
34.7
i]cc 07
633
877.31
871.08
65.3
co.10
9.9
c0.10
3.96
574
15 39
0.21
8.41
4
Oec-09
-
--
75.9
_
Jan-10 5.64 877.31 87167 59.7 - 5.7 7.8 3.94 0.563 7.88 403 0.16 4.1 -
MW-10
Jan-92
-
--
-
59.0
-
-
-
Nov-97
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
w
_
_
_
0.28
Dec 98
17.96
UL21
963.25
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NO
Nov 00
17.21
$81.21
864.00
75.2
-
-
-
5.41
B20
15.20
299
0.59
0
NO '-
Se
14.30
881.21
866.91
200.0
<D.1
c0.5
2.3
5.02
917 21.15
235
6.93
118A
-
Dec-04
12.93
882.21
868.28
55.0
0.D068J
c0,5
0.92
5.15
7% 15.DD
294
0.80
93.2
Dec-05
12.82
881.21
868.40
73.0
NO
7.30
0.54
5.29
0.700 14.56
280
0.05
$
_
Dec-06
12.90
881.21
868.31
58.0
0.05
1.60
1.20
5.21
0.848 14.21
320
4.34
2.7
Dec-07
14.04
SB1.21
967.17
49.7
[0.10
0.58
40.10
5.35
505.00 15.50
0.156
6.31
9
Dec-08
--
-
-
53.1
--
_
-
_ _
-
--
-
Jan-l0
li_75
881.21
869.46
58.7 -
<0.5
0.24
5,26
0.542 10.51
328
0.21
9.8
MW-19
Jan-98
-
-
-
65
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dec-98
-
--
NA
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
Dec-98
12.08
885.75
873.67
65.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
300
Nov-00
11.83
885.75
873.92
39.4
-
-
--
6.17
760
1S.60
240
2.19
7
NO
Sep-04
5.51
885.75
880.24
5.7
<D.1
6.6
1.4
5.34
111
19.61
350
2.70
43.97
-
Dec-04
4.50
885.75
381.25
5.7
0.01361)
2.5D
2.40
4.90
134
13.64
279
0.75
1DO.90
Dec-05
3.83
885.75
981.82
30,0
0.13
14.00
5.00
5.39
0.408
13.72
258
0.11
64
Dec-06
4.85
885.75
890.90
7.3
e0.007
4.70
3.10
5.20
0.144
13.05
311
4.30
25.4
Dee-07
5.95
885.75
879.90
63.7
e0.10
4.7
4&10
4.89
510
23.60
0.166
4.59
10
-
Dec-0S
--
--
-
11.1
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
Jan-10
3.88
885.75
981.87
18.9
-
5.1
3.5
S.D4
0.239
9.01
320
9.45
0.2
PMW-7 Dec-01
-
-
-
12.4
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
-
NO
Sep-04
9.79
-
0.44
<0.1
0.6
0.3
5.24
281.4
28.90
163
7.79 1
38.96
-
1
Dec-04
7.54
-
-
4.6
0.009.1
0.241
c0.1
4.63
298
16.71
283
- 39.00
--
Dec-05
8.68
-
2.2
NO
8.2
0.12
4.70
0.365
17.18
318
0.0D
28
-
Dec46
8.17
0.44
m.007
0.036
0.055
4.79
0161
15.86
24D
4.58
2.4
-
Dec-07
-
-
ND
<0.10
0.53
c0,10
4.49
233
16.96
0.203
3.02
13
Dec4)8
-
-
-
NO
-
-
--
_
_
_
_
_
-
Jan-10
6.20
-
0.38
-
0.63
c0.10
4.48
0.215
14.50
308
0.96
12.1
PMW-8
Dec-01
DRY
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
--
-
Sep-04
11.14
-
0.1
m.l
<0.5
0.1
5.76
185.7
22.38
2D0
3.96
11.44
-
Oec-D4
111.96
-
0.3
0.018
0.2.1
cD.l
5.16
186
14,79
283
NA
9S.10
DecOS
11.70
-
NO
NO
9.8
0.12
5.61
0.212
16.57
280
o.00
43
-
Dec-06
10.21
-
0.25 1
c0.007
0.18
cD.003
5.43
D.193
15.61
136
4.07
2.3
Dec-07
ND
c0,10
8.67
<0.10
4,77
83
17.15
0.178
2.00
16
Dec-08
Jan-10
-
0.14
--
-- -•
--
-•
_
_
9.53
0.29
-
0.5 c0.10 1
5.28
0.235 14.70
177
0.29
0
Uaca summarltea Prom Lorr"Me Acnvn Plan preparea oy Una croup oatea nnarcri iuus.
h4.itlsi
TOC = Top of Casing
STOC = Below Top of Casing
msl - mean sea level
mg/L = milligrams per Liter
m5/cm = mlllisec per centimeter
'C = Degrees Centigrade
mV= millivolts
NTU = nephelometrkc turbidity unit
µg/L = micrograms per Liter
ND= Not detected
J = Estimated concentration
<0-1 = less than the laboratary reporting limit
- = No Information available
Page 1 of 1 P:�USi Real ty Corp\Former Ingram P lywaad1139598_Workplan PreplWo rk p la n\fina l WP\H ist gw data Wcrkp[aa-x1sx

yr 1 �, 11'' J9" �� ` r• C'' �..t. �����■j]� '�II��l��l]r=
`;�t •��r'.•��� of :, . ��.'t�� ;:��• � �'������
waft
..r�'�D!"iiiAYSGI4 wa
'7,m:
• ` �� •F:�r�.' � '�f�'r�- = Rom:;+ �-;! •. •�
°AF;-� �.
INN
B row n AND
Caldwell

0 MWs
Bq�aRY __�--
6A5$ETTDR4VE
SITE
FORMER MANUFACTURING BUILDING
I
I
FORMER
WAREHOUSEI ---f
PRINTING
BUILDING
APPROXIMATE DIRECTION
`
OF GROUDWATER FLOW
I
1 JRESIN AREA
+ 1�
r �
1 0
I mw-19
!rOFI ICE]
ti✓
SLOG
zmeE wy
0
5410 Trinity Road
Palisades II, Suit® 320
Raleigh, North Carolina 27807
[phone]
NC License No. F-0785
0
pmw-a
Z
PMW-7
SOURCE? &AM MAP IS FROM A SURVEY BY BOCK AND CL*RK DATED 1:
•LMKTS OF FxcAVATIDN ARE FROM AQUATERA'S INO IGRO1 NMXTER SAMPLING FIEF --
CURRENT GROUNDWATER MONITORING NETWORK
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC. FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
FIGURE 2

_ -1 --r
BASSETT DRIVE
SliE 80�NI7ARY __� _-�-�-
I
FORMER MANUFACTURING 8UILDING
l
Ir
l
fFORMER II
WAREHOUSE) -__-----
PRINTING
I BUILDING
I APPROJ(1MAT£ D1REC71p4J
OF GRIXJOWATER FLOW
1!/ �RESIN AREA
1
LI I hM1N.19 l �
IFFICE I 1 I
l
BLDG
L j —TREE LNYff — `` 1 eMW 10 rrI
100 90 0
MONITORING WELLS SAMPLED ANNUALLY
APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOR EXCAVATIOW
INF!LMMO 1D �%VL NITWITE OONCENTRATIVN CC)WO4JR
PMW-7
SOURCE' BASE MAP IS FROM A SURVEY BY BOCK AND CLARK. DATED IZfl,% 8
,UWTS OF EXCAVATION ARE FROM AQUATERA$ 19%'GROUNDWATER SAWLING REPORT'
$ FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC- FACILITY
5110 T`in4 Road PMW-3 718 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
aII. Suite olio
Raleigh.
I, North Carolina 27607 DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
[phone]
NC License No. F-0785 FIGURE 3

13ASSET-F DRIVE
FORMER MANUFACTURING BUit- DING
FORMER F
WARE HOUSE/ ` - -
PRINTING
` BUILDING
I� APPROXEIV DIRECTION
OF GROI FLOW
1 RESIN AREA
i r
9 Mw-19
OFFICE y y ,
BLOC
'T�EF- LIME y-
--� _ x
5410 Trinity Road
Palisades II, Sude 320
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
[phone]
INC License No. F-0785
0
PMW-s
0
PMW-7
100 50 0
MONTTORING WELLS MONITORED ANNUALLY
PROPOSED SAMPLE POINTS
APPROXIMATE LIWTS OF SOIL IXCAVATTOM
INFERRED 10 rnprL NITRATE CONCENTRATION CONTOUR
SOURCE' BASE TRAP IS FROM A SURVEY BY BOCK AND CLARK, DATED I W 5W
`LIMITS OF E%CAVATION ARE FROM AGUATERA'S 19H'GROUNDWATER SAWLI NG RE PQRT-
PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC. FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
FIGURE 4

D__�-----
13ASSETT DRIVE - - _ — - - ~ - - ,
FORMER MANUFACTURING BUILDNG
1 ,.
FORMER
WAREHCIJ$Ef
PRINTING
BUILDING
APPRoxIMATE DIRECTION
OF GROiJDWATER FLOW
j f j 1,ARESIN AREA I
j !
I 1 ti Q 1�
oFFlce 1 �
BLDG 1 / r
_ R
r 1
mONrTOR1NG WELLS MONITORED ANNUAL LV
PROPOSES? INJECTION POINT
� PROPOSED INJECTION MOMTDWNG POINT
- - APPROXIMATE LIFTS OF SOIL EXCAVATION'
INFERRED 10 nwgk NITRATE CONCE T PA7]ON CONTOUR
PMW7
SOURCE: BASE MAP IS FROM A SURVEY By BOCK AND CLARK. DATED 12f15"
'LIMITS OF EXCAVATION ARE FROM AQUATERA'S 1996'G ROUNOWATER SAMPLING REPORT'
PROPOSED PILOT TEST LOCATIONS
0 FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC. FACILITY
5410 Trinity Road PMw-8 718 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
Palisades It. SiAe 320
Raae;gh, Norm Carolina 27WI DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
[phone]
NC License No, F-0785 FIGURE 5

Remedial Investigation Report
IHSB Site # NONCDO001202
Prepared for
USI Realty Corporation
March 10, 2011

Remedial Investigation Report
IHSB Site # NONCDODD1202
Prepared for
USI Realty Corporation
March 10, 2011
WRei Ruhmke, PG
Managing Geologist
Registered Site Manager
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 320
Raleigh, NC 27507
NC License No. F-0785

REMEDIATING PARTY DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (.0306(b)(2)):
A certify under penalty of law that 1 have personally examined and am familiar with the
information contained in this submittal, including any and a]1 documents accompanying this
certification, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining the information, the material and information contained herein is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. f am aware that there are significant
penalties for willfuljy submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information."
(Name of ed ing Party Official)
(Sign ture of R ediating Party Official) DAte
0 0 1 14VIVI! 1 A (Enter State)
&4jWflAVJl1Q COUNTY
1. L - 51 ime k— , a Notary Public of said County and State, do
hereby certify that WLItjOM DAV 121Me1-l-Cf did personally appear and sign
before me this day, produced proper identification in the form of CA. Ur ijeVS L CPy15e_,
was duly sworn or affirmed, and declared that, to the best of his or her knowledge and
belief, after thorough investigation, the information contained in the above certification is
true and accurate, and he or she then signed this Certification in my presence.
W TNESS my hand and offici seal this day of +rrl�
R
L
Notary Public {signature] (OFFICIAL SEAL)
My commission expires:]-une 27 2,�fv
LISCotrtnWtWn 11lg1l�
Henry POW - C ftvty
so" 8WIMrttUo f:pNlly
Cow. t�
Document Cer•t f cation Form No. DC - I

Narth Carolina Depsrtment of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
REGISTERED SITE MANAGER DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (.0306(b)(1 }):
"I certify under penalty of law that i am personally familiar with the information contained in
this submittal, including any and all supporting documents accompanying this certification, and
that the material and information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate and complete and complies with the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act G.S.
130A-310, et seq, and the remedial action program Rules 15A NCAC 13C .0300. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete
information."
Reinhard Ruhmke
(Name of Registered Site Manager)
*t * March 10, 2011
(Signature of Registered Site Manager) Date
North Carolina (Enter State)
Wake COUNTY
EWE 6A�--4 . [�.AA() , a Notary Public of said County and State, do
hereby certify that gf i ribkj,' &�N)5t did personally appear and sign
before me this day, produced proper identification in the form of Pt,% 4,jm k cQrlrt J l ire
was duly sworn or affirmed, and declared that, he or she is the duly authorized
environmental consultant of the remediating party of the property referenced above and
that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, after thorough investigation, the
information contained in the above certification is true and accurate, and he or she then
signed this Certification in my presence.
WI S m hand and official seal this /0 day of
yNotary Public [signature] z (OFFICIAL SEAL)
My commission expires: 103 1
Document Certification Form No. DC -11
EwE£INA A CAPLAP
NOTARY PUBLIC
Durham County
North Carolina
Oommission expires Juno@, nts

North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION
15A NCAC 13C.0306(b)(5)(S)
Media (check all that apply): All Media x Soil
Site Name Former Ingram Plywood
County Davidson
Site ID No. NONCDO001202
Ground water Surface water Sediment
Street Address 718 Bassett give
Thomasville, North Carolina
The remedial investigation, which is the subject of this certification has, to the best of my
knowledge, been completed in compliance with the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act G.S.
130A-310, et seq. and the remedial action program Rules 15A NCAC 13C .0300, and
Brown and Caldwell
[REC Name]
is in compliance with Rules .0305(b)(2) and .0305(b)(3), of this section. I am aware that there are
signifies t penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete Information.
&2&z� Mar 10, 2011
RSM Sigriattue Late
Reinhard Ruhmke
RSM Name
Brown and Caldwell
REC Name
00071
REC No.
North Carolina (Enter State)
Wake COUNTY
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 320
Mailing Address
Raleigh, NC 27507
tty, state, ZIP
I, C t-A lvkk Q . (a ALP , a Notary Public of said County and State, do hereby certify that
e i V- t ' did personally appear and sign before me this day, produced proper
identification in the form of ro , -1k JEA was duly sworn or affirmed, and declared that, be
or she is the duly authorized environmental consultant of the remediating party of the property referenced
above and that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, after thorough investigation, the information
contained in the above certification is true and accurate, and he or she then signed this
Certification in my presence.
W1 S my hand and official seal this Jkday of (C ao i I
Notary Public (signs e) _ (oii'dKLINA►
owilm
My commission expires: [
EbnrnNalorr Jptni iltit=
Work Phase Completion Form No. WPC - If

Table of Contents
Listof Figures...................................................................................................................................................... ii
Listof Tables.......................................................................................................................................................ii
1. Introduction...............................................................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Site Description and Environmental Setting .............................................. ..................................
1-1
1.2 History of Site Environmental Activities........................................................................................1-2
1.3 Completed Scope of Work.............................................................................................................1-4
2. Remedial Investigation .............................................................................................................................2-1
2.1 Temporary Well Installation...........................................................................................................
2-1
2.1.1 Results..............................................................................................................................2-1
2.2 Annual Well Sampling...................................................................................................................2-1
2.2.1 Results..............................................................................................................................2-2
2.3 Surface Water Sampling...............................................................................................................
2-3
2.3.1 Results..............................................................................................................................
2-3
2.4 Hyd rogeologic Characterization....................................................................................................
2-3
2.5 Site Geology....................................................................................................................................2-4
2.6 1DW.................................. ............... ........ ......................................................................................
2-4
3. Summary of Remedial Investigation.......................................................................................................3-1
4. Limitations...................................................................................................................................4-1
References.........................................................................................................................REF-1
Figures.. ............................................. ......... .................................... ........................................................... FIG-1
Tables............................ ..............................................................................................................................TAB-1
AppendixA: LabData ........... ............................. ................................................................................................. A
AppendixB: Boring Log.... .................................................................................................................. ............... B
Appendix C: Historical Groundwater Data........................................................................................................ C
Appendix D: Time vs. Concentration Graphs and Hydrographs...................................................................... D
AppendixE: Slug Test Data................................................................................................................................E
vw of wi ito nm us, vpy eticw r, -LuL1m TIT ti IV {Iflll}illi�rb Y}.X.401140 d1 IIle MrCI of Ir115 doi')rrrlU n!
US Mi PC Dart fod(.1#rt.

Remedial Investigation Report
List of Figures
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figure 2. Site Map
Figure 3. Groundwater Analytical Results for Nitrate, October 2010
Figure 4. Groundwater Flow Direction, October 2010
Figure 5. Surface Water Analytical Results, October 2010
Figure 6. Geologic Cross -Section
List of Tables
Table of Contents
Table I. Summary of Agency Correspondence Regarding Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Table 2. Summary of Temporary Well Sampling Results, October 2010
Table 3. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results and Field Measurements, October 2010
Table 4. Summary of MNA Data during Groundwater Sampling, October 2010
Table 5. Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results, October 2010
Table 6. Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Rising and Falling Slug Tests, October 201O

Section 1
Introduction
This Remedial Investigation (RI) Report presents the results of the completion of RI activities conducted
at the former Ingram Plywood Inc. (Ingram) property located at 718 Bassett Drive, Thomasville, Davidson
County, North Carolina (Site) (Figure 1) on behalf of USI Realty Corporation (USI). Groundwater beneath
the Site is impacted with nitrate above the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) 2L Standard [North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 15A 02L.0202 (f)], which
is 10 milligrams per Liter (mg/L) (NCDENR 2010a). The identified source of the nitrate is from former
on -Site usage of urea formaldehyde resin. On March 11, 2008, USI executed an Administrative
Agreement (AA) with NCDENR to enter the NCDENR Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) program,
a voluntary remedial action program (NCDENR 2008). The AA outlined a schedule to complete the
voluntary remedial program as outlined in North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) 130A-310.9(c), 15A
NCAC 13C .0300, and the Registered Environmental Consultant Program Implementation Guidance of
the NCENR Division of Waste Management (NCDENR 2010b). The schedule called for completion of the
RI within 3 years of the effective date of the AA (March 11, 2008). Although significant investigation and
remedial activities had occurred at the Site prior to 2008, the Phase II RI Workplan (the "Workplan")
(Brown and Caldwell 2010) described the technical rationale to complete the RI for nitrate under the
supervision and direction of the Registered Site Manager (RSM) and in compliance with the AA.
Following submittal of this RI Report, USI will move forward with the next phase of work outlined in the
AA by initiating remedial action for the nitrate groundwater impacts within 5 years of the effective date of
the AA (NCDENR 2008).
The following Sections provide a summary of the Rl activities completed at the Site.
1.1 Site Description and Environmental Setting
A Site description and environmental setting was provided in Section 5 of the Corrective Action Plan
(CAP) (URS 2003a). The Site center is located at approximately Latitude (North) 35" 54' 38", Longitude
(West) 800 03' 82" in Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina. Based on a review of the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) 7Y2-Minute Topographic Series for the High Point West Quadrangle, the
center of the Site is located at an approximate elevation of 890 feet above mean sea level (amsl) (USGS
1987) and the local topography slopes to the south (Figure 1). The Site encompasses approximately 4
acres of land and previously contained three buildings; an approximate 47,705 square -foot (ft2)
manufacturing building which was divided into Sections A, B & C, an approximate 16,000 ft2 warehouse
and printing building, and an approximate 1,000 ft2 office building (Figure 2). All the buildings have
been removed and the Site is now vacant land (URS 2003a).
Work Process Description. Ingram Plywood Inc. manufactured shaped plywood products at the Site from
1953 to 1990 by combining wood materials with adhesive. The adhesive consisted of urea
formaldehyde resin and an aluminum sulfate activator that reacted when mixed to form a fully
polymerized urea formaldehyde resin (URS 2003a). The plywood assembly process utilized ram presses
to compress the plywood layers together after the adhesive is applied. The presses used hydraulic oil
and were located in the manufacturing building. Several underground storage tanks (USTs) were used at
the Site to support manufacturing operations. A 550-gallon #2 fuel oil UST was located on the north side
of the warehouse/printing building. A 2,000-gallon gasoline UST and 8,000-gallon #2 fuel oil UST were
1.1

Remedial investigation Report Section 1
located between Sections A and C of the manufacturing building, These LISTS were properly closed out
under NCDENR oversight.
The urea formaldehyde resin generated during manufacturing operations was disposed In an area
behind the manufacturing building (Figure 2). Urea formaldehyde resin degrades into ammonia,
methanol, and nitrogen compounds.
Water Supply Well Informatlon. A water -well survey was performed by Dames and Moore in October
1999, The survey identified three private wells within 1,500 feet of the Site. Two of the wells were no
longer being used and a third well served two residences on the Dill property. These three wells were
abandoned and the houses on the Dill property were connected to the City of Thomasville water system
(Dames and Moore 2000). A review of the public water -supply system indicated that there are no public
water intakes In the vicinity of the site. The source of public water for the Davidson County Water
Department is Lake TomaIicks and for Davidson Water (a private corporation) is the Yadkirti River (URS
2003a). Brown and Caldwell also reconnoitered the Site vicinity in October 2010 and did not observe
the presence of any water -supply wells.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Brown and Caldwell staff contacted the appropriate agencies to
investigate the potential presence of environmentally sensitive areas as required in the REC guidance
(NCENR 2010b). Based on the information provided by several agencies, the area in the vicinity of the
Site is considered environmentatly sensitive. No remedial activity on the Site is planned that would
result in sediment and nutrient runoff to the small tributaries to Hunts Fork and contribute to turbidity
and chlorophyll levels in High Flock Lake. Further consultation with NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) and North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission may be required if future Site activities
potentially impact the Hunts Fork tributaries. The tributaries are located east of the Site while Hunts
Fork is located south of the Site (Figure 1), A summary of agencies contacted and their response is
provided in Table 1.
Site Ownership Information. The Site has been owned by USl or its subsidiaries since 1953. A map
depicting the Site boundaries is provided as Figure 2.
1.2 History of Site Environmental Activities
Site environmental activities have been conducted at the Site since 1985. The environmental activities
conducted at the Site included: investigation of the resin -impacted area, the manufacturing area, print
shop, and underground storage tank (UST) locations. Remediation activities have been conducted at the
Site since 1989 and included: soil excavation at the former resin -impacted area, print shop area, former
UST locations, manufacturing areas, free product recovery systems, and nitrate contaminated
groundwater extraction and discharge. A summary of prior environmental activities was provided in the
CAP (URS 2003a), The results of the environmental activities include the following:
1. 65 cubic yards (yds3) of soil containing residual resin was excavated from a waste -pit located behind
the manufacturing Building in 1985 (ENSCI Corporation 1989).
2. One 2,000-gallon gasoline UST and one 8,000-gallon #2 fuel oil UST were removed in 1989.
Approximately 35 tons of petroleum -impacted soil was removed and disposed offsite. A 'No further
action' (NFA) status for the USTs was granted by NCDENR in May 2000 (NCDENR Case # 5539),
1.. One 550-gallon heating oil UST was removed in 1994. Approximately 14 tons of petroleum -impacted
soil was removed and disposed offsite. NFA status for the UST was granted by NCDENR in December
1999 (NCDENR Case # 12840).
2. In October 1991. Sections A and B of the Manufacturing Building were demolished. Approximately
1,700 tons of petroleum -impacted soil were removed from the Manufacturing/UST Area and
disposed off -Site. Groundwater remediation using petroleum recovery systems (two trenches) and
`Aggressive Fluid Vapor Recovery' was conducted. NFA status for the Manufacturing/UST Area was
granted by NODE NR in May 2000 (NCDENR Case # 5539),
1-2
Lo&oa of CDnfenfs on Mira hiI W it *WUpk*j wH If, 4 t1111, L114111k %4JL 401*0 Ad UAL' W U14r 4110- R
uSl RI kepor? 1mal.ilofm

Remedial Investigation Report
Section 1
3. In October 1991, the resin -impacted area [--16,000 square feet (ft!')] was excavated to a depth of
approximately 1-foot below ground surface (tags). Approximately 900 yds3 of impacted soil was
removed and disposed offsite.
4. In October 1991, approximately 28 yds3 of impacted soil was removed from the print shop loading
dock area. An area of approximately 375 ftz was excavated to a depth between 1.5 and 2-feet bgs
and the soil disposed offsite.
5. A groundwater recovery system for nitrate removal was installed in July 1994 and consisted of two
recovery wells (RW-2 and RW-3). Operation ceased in late 1996 after removal of approximately
468,600 gallons.
6. In March 1999. approximately 26 tons of formaldehyde impacted soil was excavated in the vicinity of
soil boring S1319. This impacted area was discovered during confirmation soil borings and appeared
to be a small area containing hardened resins and other debris.
7. A water -well survey was performed in October 1999. The survey identified three wells within 1,500
feet of the Site. Two of the wells were no longer being used and a third well served two residences
on the Dill property. These three wells were abandoned and the houses on the Dill property were
connected to the City of Thomasville water system.
8. A soil -to -groundwater value of 38.86 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for formaldehyde was
calculated by URS (URS 2003b). The highest residual formaldehyde concentration in soil was
148.26 mg/kg in soil boring SB-16. It was determined that the potential impact to groundwater from
the residual formaldehyde concentrations in soil was negligible. Formaldehyde was not detected in
groundwater in the November 2000 sampling event. NCDENR agreed with this conclusion in
correspondence dated April 14, 2003 and also stated that no further assessment was necessary.
NCDENR also requested that a CAP be submitted.
9. A CAP for remediation of nitrate in groundwater was submitted by URS in March 2003 (URS 2003a).
The extent of nitrate -impacted groundwater was con flned to the area between MW-18, MW-20, and
PMW-8. The selected groundwater remedy was Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) to reduce
nitrate concentrations in groundwater to below the NCDENR 2L standard of 10 mg/L. In the
approved CAP, wells MW-5, MW-19, RW-2. PMW 7, and PMW-8 were to be sampled annually in
addition to three stream locations. The CAP was approved by NCDENR in correspondence dated May
24, 2004. Based on the NCDENR CAP approval letter, the constituents of concern (COCs) remaining
for the Site are nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and total k}eIdahI nitrogen (TKN).
10, During the September 2004 Sampling event, it was noticed that recovery well RW-2 had been
vandalized and could not be sampled. NCDENR was contacted and agreed that wells MW-6 and
MW-10 would be sampled in substitution for RW-2, with MW-10 located directly upgradient of RW-2
and MW-6 located in the general vicinity of RW-2.
11. In March 2007, the Site was transferred from the NCDENR Groundwater Section to the NCDENR
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB). The REC agreement for incorporating the Site into the REC
program was executed on March 11, 2008.
12. Annual groundwater sampling was performed by URS from 2005 until January 2010 as part of the
approved remedy (MNA). Based upon the results of the January 2010 sampling at the Site (URS
2010), URS concluded that:
• The nitrate plume remains stable (not expanding) and centered in the southern portion of the
Ingram property;
• The analytical results of the surface water samples indicate the stream has not been impacted by
nitrate -contaminated groundwater that may originate from the Site and discharge to the stream;
and
• The nitrate concentrations in the downgradient wells (PMW-7 and PMW-8) are below the NCDENR
2L nitrate groundwater standard (10.0 mg/L); and
1.3

Remedial Investigation Report
Section 1
• Based upon the results of the January 2010 Sampling, URS recommended that the approved
MINA remedial action continue to be implemented.
1.3 Completed Scope of Work
In June 2010, USI retained Brown and Caldwell to continue with Site remediation activities in the REC
program. As described previously, a significant amount of Site characterization data already has been
collected. Historic releases to soil and groundwater beneath the Site have been largely characterized
and remedlated and the only remaining Site COCs are nitrogen compounds in groundwater consisting of
nitrate, nitrite, ainmonia, and TKN. To complete the Remedial Investigation as required by the REC
program, additional Site investigation data was needed. These data gaps were outlined in the Workplan
(Brown and Caldwelt 2O1O) and included the following:
• Complete the evaluation for environmentally sensitive areas;
• Analyses of select groundwater samples for additional MNA parameters such as dissolved gasses
(i.e. carbon dioxide), total organic carbon (TOC), iron, manganese, sulfate, and phosphate to
further evaluate the denitrification processes at the Site;
• Additional groundwater sampling in the vicinity of the wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 using
temporary wells to further refine the dimensions of the nitrate plume; and
• Aquifer slug tests in wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 to gather additional hydrogeologic data.
The investigative methodologies used to complete the Remedial Investigation and fill the data gaps were
provided in the Workplan (Brown and Caldwell 2010). Brown and Caldwell implemented the scope of
work outlined in the Workplan in October 2010 and this work included the following:
1. Identified any environmentally sensitive areas in the vicinity of the Site. The summary is provided in
Section 1.1;
2. Installed five temporary monitoring wells (SB-1 through SB-5). Two of the temporary wells (SB-1 and
SB-3) could not be advanced past approximately 12.14 feet bgs due to hard drilling conditions and
were dry. Collected water samples from three of the five temporary wells and analyzed them for
nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and TKN;
3. Performed aquifer slug testing in wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19, and
4. Implemented the annual sampling program as outlined in the approved CAP (URS 2003a). The
groundwater samples were analyzed for nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and TKN. Conduct additional MNA
sampling on select wells. The results of the latest annual sampling event are provided in this Report.
The following Section provides a summary of the results of Brown and Caldwell's Phase II Remedial
Investigation.
1-4
u�Y. Vi,F111:1i;a U(I 1!IIti `ifik"J .:. 7�111i': I I5- II �L 1111iiir!!7', Y;w: ih!" !11 i1 �•'-••�• ail .. i� .,,i� .� ...
LSI M Rowel Anigi-ood

Section 2
Remedial Investigation
This Section provides a summary of the results of supplemental RI activities performed by Brown and
Caldwell pursuant to the Workplan (Brown and Caldwell 2010). Work was conducted under a Site -
specific health and safety plan (HASP) prepared by Brown and Caldwell. All work was performed under
the supervision of a Professional Geologist registered in the State of North Carolina. A summary of
collected data are provided in Tables 1-6. Copses of the analytical reports are provided in Appendix A.
For data presentation purposes in this Report, the results are focused on Nitrate, the primary COC. In
addition, any other compounds that were detected above the United States Environmental Protection
Agency [USEPA] Maximum Contaminant Levels [MCLs] or Regional Screening Levels [RSLs] [USEPA
20091) or North Carolina 2L (NCDENR 2010a) and 2B (NCDENR 2007a) Standards are also reported.
2.1 Temporary Well Installation
Five temporary groundwater monitoring wells (SB-1 through SB-5) were installed on October 26, 2010
(see Figure 2). The temporary groundwater monitoring wells were installed to varying depths until hard
soil conditions were encountered between 8 and 19 feet bgs using direct -push and hollow -stem auger
drilling methodology. Drill refusal occurred in each boring and a temporary well consisting of 1-inch
diameter schedule 40 PVC casing with 5-feet of screen having 0.010-inch slot size was installed.
Each well was purged of approximately one well volume using a single -use disposable bailer before
collecting the groundwater sample. Temporary wells SB-1 and SB-3 were dry and could not be sampled.
Following completion of groundwater sampling activities, the temporary well casing was removed and the
boring was backfilled with a cement/bentonite grout mixture. The locations of the temporary wells were
measured from an existing well location using a hand-held tape measure. Soil boring logs are provided
in Appendix B.
The groundwater samples were preserved, packaged, and transported under chain -of -custody protocol to
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Pace) in Huntersville, North Carolina, a State -of -North -Carolina -certified
analytical testing laboratory. The groundwater samples were analyzed for nitrate and nitrite by USEPA
Method 353.2, ammonia by USEPA Method 350.1, and TKN by USEPA Method 351.2
2.1.1 Results
The temporary well sample results are presented on Figure 3. A summary of groundwater analytical
results for the temporary wells is provided in Table 2. Analytical results indicated the presence of nitrate
above the NCDENR 2L nitrate groundwater standard (10 mg/L) in temporary wells SB-2 and SB-5 (Figure
3).
To gather data for anticipated remedlal design pilot testing, one soil sample was collected from SB-5 at a
depth of 19 feet bgs and analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC). TOC was not detected in this sample.
2.2 Annual Well Sampling
The 2010 annual sampling was performed in general accordance with the approved CAP (URS 2003a)
and subsequent modifications (URS 2010). Figure 3 shows the locations of the wells sampled during
the 2010 annual sampling event completed on October 26, 2010. Prior to sampling wells MW-5, MW-6,
MW-10, MW-19. PMW-7, and PMW-8, water level measurements were recorded in each well.
2-1
i -.I ;:If ill:.. . II;... m�4 11 . .L.:J:4 i, 4 1., I... n, :.1 t.I.fI III II
JSI ril RtPO" fPMA1.E%DCY

Remedial Investigation Report Section 2
After the water level measurements were collected, the wells were sampled utilizing low -flow sampling
procedures (USEPA 1996). A peristaltic pump with tubing was used for the sampling event. During the
low- flow purging, pH, specific conductance, temperature, conductivity (Eh), dissolved oxygen, and
turbidity were measured. The groundwater field parameters are presented on Table 3. After
stabilization, the wells were sampled from the discharge hose using the low -flow purge/sampling
technique with laboratory -supplied sample containers and preservative.
Non -dedicated and reusable equipment used for purging and sampling was decontaminated between
each well. Field decontamination procedures included washing measuring instruments between wells
with a detergent solution wash and distilled water rinse. New tubing and string were utilized for each
well. When possible, wells were sampled in order of lowest to highest concentration of groundwater
contamination based on data from the previous sampling event (URS 2010). Instruments and
equipment used to gather or measure environmental data were calibrated at least daily, consistent with
the manufacturer's specifications, to increase the accuracy and reproducibility of the results.
Appropriate quality assu ra nce/q ua I ity control (QA/QC) samples, including a duplicate sample, were als❑
collected. The groundwater and QA/QC samples were preserved, packaged, and transported under
chain -of -custody protocol to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Pace) in HuntersviIle, North Carolina, a State -
of -North -Carolina -certified analytical testing laboratory, Samples from each monitoring well, including
the duplicate sample, were analyzed for Nitrate, Nitrite, TKN, and Ammonia. Samples collected for
evaluation of MNA parameters from MW,S, MW-10, MW-19, and PMW-7 were also analyzed for sulfate
and chloride by USEPA Method 300.0, total alkalinity as CACO3 by State Method (SM) 2320B, Total
Organic Carbon (TOC) by SM 5310, total orthophosphate by USEPA Method 365.1, and total manganese
and iron by USEPA Method 3010/6010. A copy of the analytical results is provided in Appendix A.
2.2.1 Results
The water level measurements are presented in Table 3. Figure 4 presents the groundwater flow
direction based on the October 2010 water level measurements. Based on the results of the October
2010 elevation data, groundwater flaw is generally in a southerly direction, which is consistent with
historical data.
The October 2010 analytical groundwater results for Nitrate are presented on Figure 3. A summary of
groundwater analytical results is provided in Tables 3 and 4. Analytical results indicated the presence of
nitrate above the NCDENR nitrate 2L standard (10 mg/L) in wells MW-6 and MW-10. As depicted on
Figure 3, the general extent of nitrate above the NCDENR 2L standard has been adequately delineated
based on the current data, the results of the temporary well sampling, and historic groundwater
analytical data (Appendix C), In the vicinity of the former resin impacted area, nitrate concentrations in
wells MW-6 (40.8 mg/L) and MW-19 (4.0 mg/L) have decreased since the last sampling event in January
2010 (Table 3). The nitrate concentration in well MW-10 (69.8 mg/L) has increased since the last
sampling event in January 2010 (Table 3) but is still similar to historical concentrations. The
concentrations of nitrates have ranged from highs of 100 mg/L, 100 mg/L, and 63.7 mg/L in MW-6,
MW-10, and MW-19, respectively. The upgradient (MW-5) and downgradient wells (PMW-7 and PMW-8)
continue to show nitrate concentrations below the NCDENR 2L standard. overall, with the nitrate
concentration in well MW-19 now below the NCDENR 2L Standard and not -detected in downgradient well
PMW-7, the nitrate plume appears to be shrinking. Time vs. concentration graphs for nitrate for wells
MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 are provided in Appendix D.
Ideally, nitrate degradation (denitrification) shows a sequential breakdown of NO3 (nitrate) NO2
(nitrate) —> N0 — N2O —+N2. Denitriflcat! on occurs naturally, however, usually at very Iow rates unless
an abundant carbon source is present (ITRC 2000). The TOC data from 58-5 indicates that carbon is not
present in the system at high concentrations. Denitrification in groundwater generally occurs hest in an
anaerobic [dissolved oxygen (DO) < 2 mg/Ll environment with the pH being neutral to slightly alkaline
(USEPA 2007). Groundwater samples have been analyzed for select geochemical parameters (e.g,. 00,
2-2
_!• yi s_,roor.is on II pis Z�iii �� �,�1!•�yy,i i4, :,,L• ji ! t,,!,u­ �.•1' j •,i f,., ,,,;I I'I ilii-. ill d
'.i TV Report final-uu x

Remedial Investigation Report Section 2
pH, specific conductance, etc.) to evaluate potential nitrate fate mechanisms such as denitrification. A
review of groundwater data collected during the October 2010 sampling event showed that DO
concentrations were less than 1 mg/L with neutral pH conditions within the plume (average pH -- 7).
Denitrification appears to be occurring however at a relatively slow rate likely due to the lack of carbon in
the system. A summary of MNA data is provided in Tables 3 and 4.
Quality control Sample Analytical Results. The duplicate sample, labeled Dup, contained similar nitrate
concentrations as the primary sample from well MW-5.
2.3 Surface Water Sampling
During the annual sampling event, the stream located on the southern side of the adjacent property was
sampled in three locations to evaluate whether the stream is impacted by groundwater discharging to it.
One of the stream sample locations was situated upgradient of the Site (labeled upstream), the other
location was situated in an area downgradient of the Site (labeled downgradient), and the third location
was situated further downstream (labeled downstream). Figure 5 shows the locations of the three
stream samples in relation to the Site. The stream was sampled by collecting grab samples using
containers provided by the laboratory.
2.3.1 Results
The October 2010 analytical surface water results for Nitrate are presented on Figure 5. A summary of
surface water analytical results is provided in Table 5. Nitrates were not detected in the upstream
Sample but were detected at 1.8 mg/L and 0.32 mg/L in the downgradient and downstream surface
water sample locations, respectively (Figure 5). These concentrations do not exceed the NCDENR
surface water standard of 10 mg/L (15A NCAC 2B .0200) (NCDENR 2007a). The current and historical
stream sample results indicate that nitrate has been detected in the upstream sample at concentrations
below the NCDENR 2B standard of 10 mg/L. Nitrate concentrations in the surface water samples
collected downgradient and downstream of the Site have also been consistently below the NCDENR 2B
standard (Table 5) (NCDENR 2007a).
2.4 Hydrogeologic Characterization
Saturated soil was encountered at a depth of approximately 6 feet bgs in SB-4 and 14 feet bgs in SB-5.
The water elevation in the sampled groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5, MW-6, MW-10, MW-19, PMW-
7, and PMW-8) reached a maximum elevation of 880.65 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the central
portion of the Site (MW-19) and a minimum elevation of 866.22 feet amsl in the southern portion of the
Site (MW-10). Wells PMW-7 and PMW-8 have not been surveyed. Based on the depth to water
measurements from these groundwater monitoring wells, the groundwater flow direction on October 26,
2010 is generally southerly (Figure 4) and is consistent with historical groundwater flow direction. The
horizontal groundwater flow gradient in the impacted area is calculated to be approximately 0.21 feet
per foot (ft/ft). Hydrographs for wells MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19 are provided in Appendix D.
Aquifer testing (slug tests) was conducted on three wells (MW-6, MW-10, and MW-19) following NCDENR
guidelines (NCDENR 2007b). For all slug -test tests, performed in 0ctober 2010, the observed response
in water level was measured using a pre -calibrated pressure transducer/data logger. Both slug -in and
the slug -out aquifer tests were monitored. The slug -in (falling head) test consisted of introducing a PVC
slug -into the well while monitoring water level response. The slug -out (rising head) test consisted of
instantaneously removing the slug while monitoring the water level on a quarter -second interval for
approximately 20 minutes or until the water level had recovered to within 95 percent (minimum) of static
level.
2-3

Remedial Investigation Report Section 2
All time -displacement data from the tests was downloaded to a laptop computer and reviewed in the
field. For tests with minimal response or where the response was not complete or irregular, the test was
repeated. All data was imported in a spreadsheet for analysis.
For each test, the observed time -displacement data was analyzed for hydraulic conductivity using cure
matching techniques in accordance with Bouwer and Rice (1976) and Bouwer (1989) solution methods.
Plots of time -displacement data for all tests and copies of the best fit curve for each test are provided in
Appendix E.
A summary of the "best fit" hydraulic conductivity values are presented on Table 6. As indicted on Table
6, estimated hydraulic conductivity values from the slug tests ranged from approximately 0.921 feet per
day (ft/day) to 1.86 ft/day with an average hydraulic conductivity value of approximately 1.4 ft/day. The
calculated hydraulic conductivities correspond to typical published values for silt/silty sand (Freeze and
Cherry 1979) which is consistent with observed lithologies.
2.5 Site Geology
The Site -specific geology has been developed from Site -specific data collected from well and borehole
logging during on -Site drilling by Brown and Caldwell and available information from previous
environmental reports. The lithologies encountered in the drilling of SB-1 through SB-5 were fairly
consistent and included primarily interbedded silt and fine sand to the total depth investigated
(approximately 19 feet bgs). A geologic cross-section was prepared for the impacted area based on the
available information and is provided as Figure 6. Hard drilling conditions were encountered and auger
refusal occurred at varying depths in borings SB-1 through SB-5.
2.6 I DW
Investigation -derived wastes (IDW) were containerized and temporarily stored in labeled 55-gallon drums
and left on a concrete pad on -Site pending characterization and off -Site disposal. The IDW consisted of
soil cuttings, purge water, and decontamination water produced during Brown and CaldweWs
Remedial Investigation activities.
2.4

Section 3
Summary of Remedial Investigation
With the submittal of this RI Report, USI has completed the Rl requirements as articulated in the AA. The
following provides a summary of the results of the Remedial Investigation:
• The area in the vicinity of the Site is considered to be environmentally sensitive. No remedial Site
activities are planned that would impact the Hunts Fork tributaries;
• No further assessment is necessary as agreed to by NCDENR in correspondence dated April 14,
2003;
• Prior soil remediation activities were sufficient in remedlating the reported impacts in the vadose-
zone;
• Soil lithology beneath the Site generally consists of silt and fine/medium sand. The measured depth
to groundwater ranged between 8 and 15 feet below the top of casing. The horizontal groundwater
flow is southerly at a gradient of approximately 0.21 ft/ft in the impacted area. Groundwater
velocities average approximately 1.4 ft/day;
• Nitrate concentrations in the surface water samples collected downgradient and downstream of the
Site have been consistently below the NCDENR 2B standard; and
• The remaining Site COC (Nitrate) was detected above its' 2L standard (10 mg /L) in welts MW-5 and
MW-10 and the plume appears to be shrinking and is currently centered in the southern portion of
the Site. The extent of nitrate in groundwater has been adequately defined and the investigation data
is sufficient to move forward with groundwater remedial activities, as needed.
3-1

Section 4
Limitations
This document was prepared solely for USI in accordance with professional standards at the time the
services were performed and in accordance with the contract between USI and Brown and Caldwell
dated February 15, 2011. This document is governed by the specific scope of work authorized by USI; it
is not intended to be relied upon by any other party except for regulatory authorities contemplated by the
scope of work. We have relied on information or instructions provided by USI and other parties and,
unless otherwise expressly indicated, have made no independent investigation as to the validity,
completeness, or accuracy of such information,
This document sets forth the results of certain services performed by Brown and Caldwell with respect to
the former Ingram Plywood Facility described therein {the Site}, USI recognizes and acknowledges that
these services were designed and performed within various limitations, including budget and time
constraints. These services were not designed or intended to determine the existence and nature of all
possible environmental risks (which term shalt include the presence or suspected or potential presence
of any hazardous waste or hazardous substance, as defined under any applicable law or regulation, or
any other actual or potential environmental problems or liabilities) affecting the Site. The nature of
environmental risks is such that no amount of additional inspection and testing could determine as a
matter of certainty that all environmental risks affecting the Site had been identified. Accordingly, THIS
DOCUMENT DOES NOT PURPORT TO DESCRIBE ALL ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AFFECTING THE SITE. NOR
WILL ANY ADDITIONAL TESTING OR INSPECTION RECOMMENDED OR OTHERWISE REFERRED TO IN THIS
DOCUMENT NECESSARILY IDENTIFY ALL ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AFFECTING THE SITE.
Further, Brown and Caldwell makes no warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this document,
except for those, if any, contained in the agreement pursuant to which the document was prepared. All
data, drawings, documents, or information contained this report have been prepared exclusively for the
person or entity to whom it was addressed and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity
without the prior written consent of Brown and Caldwell unless otherwise provided by the Agreement
pursuant to which these services were provided.
Brown Caldwell
-1
LiSle Of c0:1Nents on 1fb5 sneer Is suolm'T lR 7 P - 4ftlrtaT Wn4 50C Ahea at ti 10 unO rl! I ht. 01.WL,ffl a nI
J5f RI R#4 xir} Irrral.elirt4

References
Bouwer, H. and R.C. Rice, 1976. A slug test method for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined
aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resources Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.
423-428.
Bouwer, H., 1989. The Bouwer and Rice slug test --an update, Ground Water, voi. 27, no. 3, pp. 304-309.
Brown and Caldwell 2010, Workplan to complete Phase !l Remedial Investigation. September 15, 2010.
Dames and Moore 2000. Water -Well Abandonment. Letter to NCDENR dated April 14, 2000.
ENSCI 1989. Environmental Audit. December 1989.
Freeze and Cheery 1979. Groundwater. R. Allen Freeze and John A. Cherry. Prentice Hall, Inc.
ITRC 2000. Emerging Technologies for Enhanced In Situ Siodenitrification (EISBD) of Nitrate -
Contaminated Ground Water, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC) Work Group, June
2000
NCDENR 20O7a. Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable, 15A NCAC 26.0200. May 1,
2007.
NCDENR 2007b. Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Slug Tests and Pumping Tests Policy.
Memorandum dated May 31, 2007.
NCDENR 2008- Executed REC Administrative Agreement. Letter to USI dated March 11, 2008.
NCDENR 2010a. NCDENR Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable, 15A NCAC 2L .0100,
.0200, and .0300. January 1, 2010
NCDENR 2010b. REC Program implementation Guidance. NCDENR Guidance dated August 2010.
URS 2003a. Corrective Action Plan for Nitrate Groundwater Contamination: and Petroleum Free Product.
URS Group. Report dated March 2003.
URS 2003b. Supplemental Sampling Report. URS Group. Report dated March 27, 2003.
URS 2010. 2009 Annual Monitoring Report. URS Group. Report dated February 2010.
USEPA 1996. Puls, R.W., and Barcelona, M.J., Low Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Groundwater Sampling
Procedures, EPA Groundwater Issue, April 1996.
USEPA 2007. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganic Contaminants in Ground Water, Volume 2 -
Assessment for Non -Radionuclides including Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel,
Nitrate, Perchlorate, and Selenium. EPA Document # EPA/600/R-07/140 dated October 2007.
USEPA 2009. Regional Screening Levels located at htto://www.eoa.gov/re h and/risk/humanlrb-
n n r iQ0 ti5blg&agneric Igolgondpx.htm, updated December 2009.
USGS 1987.7112-Minute Topographic Series, High Point West Quadrangle Map, United States Geotogical
Survey, revised 1987.
REF-1
I: Sc is L! i IJ✓I.ts.Jr, r;r,5 strae" �5 SliL 11'C11tl}hh Illmt 7t14n14tllY.r�li7�7 r1t'�i� rill, .r Ir�� .ill l� I+lii:•r �i
LS} R1 iienrnt fiisafalom

Remedial investigation Report
Figures
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figure 2. Site Map
Figure 3. Groundwater Analytical Results for Nitrate, ❑ctober 2010
Figure 4. Groundwater Flow Direction, October 2010
Figure 5. Surface Water Analytical Results, October 2010
Figure 6. Geologic Cross -Section
FIG-1

RViy
VAX,
�; '�
Brown ANO
Caldwell

SITE BCUN17�
MW-1A
f FORMER
WAREHOLISEI
F PRINTING
� BUILDING
I MW-1
MW-2
r �
' SB-&
MW�-1$
r �a+IZ
OFFICE
6LM
PMW-3
0
PP-1
0
PMW-5
39(
PMW-6
All
SOURCE: URS, SITE DIAGRAM, FIGURE 2
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
CROSS SECTION LINE A -A'
MW-5 GROUNDWATER MONITOR WELL
MW-12 0 ABANDONED WELL
RW-3 RECOVERY WELL
S6-2 * TEMPORARY WELL
Figure 2
SITE MAP
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

BASSE
SITE BOUNDARY
,
L
i
ji
{ FORMER j
I WAREHOUSE/ L^ ~-
� � PRINTING
BUILp2NG ,
i
I
(Ns) 1
FORMER '
OFFICEBLDG
' I
SOURCE: URS, SITE DIAGRAM, FIGURE 2
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
MW-6 +
MONITORING WELL LOCATION WITH
(40.8)
NITRATE RESULTS IN MILLIGRAMS
PER LITER (mglL)
SB-5 *
TEMPORARY WELL LOCATION WITH
(016)
NITRATE IN mg/L
- - NITRATE CONTOUR 10 mglL
Figure 3
GROUNDWATER
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR
NITRATE, OCTOBER 2010
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Mw-5
* 879.78
BASSETT DRIVE
SITE BOUNDARY
i
IFORMER MANUFACTUI
FORMER
1 WAREHOUSE/
PRINTING
$UILDING
APPROXIMATE DIRECTION
OF GROUNDWATER FLOW
r
FORMER RESIN EXCAVATION
MW-19
1
_ 880.66
OFT-pue
J - Mw-6
866-22
1 r r
SOURCE; URS, SITE DIAGRAM, FIGURE 2
IVA
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
MW-5 * MONITORING WELL LOCATION
879.78 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN
FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
Figure 4
GROUNDWATER FLOW
DIRECTION, OCTOBER 2010
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

M
morumn-vat i T6!
t
Braw nAND
Caldwell

LANNERTY I Mar 10, 2011 • 11:29AM I Dwgi FIGURE 6 Cx055 SEUTION revkltW I Layout E5.5rU (axis uwU) I Pam: Y:wn,jectsun9ram%14OM11CAo-ESEasoMap
0 25 50
SCALE IN FEET
p� VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=25'
i GROUNDWATER ON OCTOBER 262010ATION
Z
w
Z ® SILT/CLAY
O
905 ¢ w 905 FINEIMEDIUM SAND
w> Z
900 2 < J 900
lj r 06 0) w 47
> 895 m w ul r 895 >
w fIJ Ln F- O W
-j 890 m' r 890
Uj 885 V? m 885 U)
2 875 ? 875 M
w w
> 870 870 p
865 865
w 860 880 w
u w
855 855
850 850
Figure b
CROSS SECTION A -A'
FORMER IIVGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
CaldwelL 718 BASSETT DRIVE
SOURCE: URS, SITE DIAGRAM, FIGURE 2 THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Remedial Investigation Report
Tables
Table 1. Summary of Agency Correspondence Regarding Environmentally
Sensitive Areas
Table 2. Summary of Temporary Well Sampling Results, October 2010
Table 3. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results and Field Measurements,
October 2010
Table 4. Summary of MNA Data, October 2010
Table 5. Summary of Surface Water Sample Results, October 2010
Table 6. Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Rising and Falling Slug Tests,
October 2010
TAB-1

Agency 1 -Information
NC Division of Harry LeGrand
Parks and
Recreation [phone]
Natural Heritage I h r .i r n n r. v
Program
Brian Strong
NC Planning and
(919) 7 15-87 11
Natural Resources
6rian.Stron ncdgnr.gov
National Park
Anita Barnett
Service - Public
[phone] ext. 705
Affairs Office
Ruth Berner
[phone]
US Forest Service
Rberner@FS. FED.US
i
NC Division of Melanie Wiliams
Water Quality [phone]
NC Division of Chris Carlson
Forest Resources [phone]
Pete Benjamin
USFWS [phone] ext. 11
Nk miaminafws.gov
Sensitive Environment
State Parks
Areas Important to Maintenance of unique Natural
Communities
Sensitive Areas identified Under the National Estuary
Program
Designated State Natural Areas
State Seashore, Lakeshore and River Recreational Areas
Rare species (state and federal Threatened and
Endangered)
Sensitive Aquatic Habitat
State Wild and Scenic Rivers
National Seashore, Lakeshore, and River Recreational
Areas
National Parks or Monuments
Federal Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers _
Designated and Proposed Federal Wilderness and
Naturai Areas
National Preserves and Forests
Federal Land Designated for the Protection of Natural
Ecosystems
Action
Requested Map via email
Requested Map via email
Left Message and sent email
Requested Map via email
State -Designated Areas for Protection or Maintenance of Send Map to Heather Patt
Aquatic Life heather. patt®ncdenr.ggv_
State Preserves and Forests N/A
Endangered Species
Agency Response
The Natural Heritage Program
has no record of rare species,
significant natural
communities, significant
natural heritage areas, or
conservation/managed areas
at the Site or within a mile of
the project area.
No sensitive Aquatic Habitats
or State Wild and Scenic
Rivers
There are no sensitive
environments at a adjacent to
the Site that are of concern to
the USDA Forest Service.
DWQ determined that this
area is considered
environmentally sensitive. Any
activity on this Site needs to
eliminate sediment and
nutrient runoff to the small
tributaries that directly impact
Hunts Fork and contribute to
turbidity and chlorophyll levels
in High Rock Lake.
Verbally confirmed that the
Site and adjacent areas do not
have such resources.
No federally listed species•
Submitted map to regional office Section 7 is fulfilled.
Nancy ColeWws.gov
1of2

Agency Contact Person and
lnformatlon
NDAA
NC Department of
Cultural Resources
NC Division of
Coastal
Management
NC Wildlife
Resources
Commission
Sensitive Environment
Matt Stout Marine Sanctuaries
[phone] ext. 273
Renee Gledhill -Early
[phone] National and Stale Historical Sites
Ted Tyndall Areas Identified Under Coastal Protection Legislation
[phone] Coastal Barriers or Unties of Coastal Barrier Resources
System
David Cox
[phone]
US Army Corps of Dorothy Harrington
Engineers [phone] ext. 28
National or State Wildlife Refuges
Migratory Pathways and Feeding Areas Critical for
Maintenance of Anadramous Fish Species within River
Reaches or Areas in Lakes or Coastal Tidal Waters in
which such Fish Spend Extended Periods of Time
Spa wn i ng Areas Critical for the Maintenance of
Fish/Shellfish Species within River, Lake or Coastal Tidal
Waters
Wetlands
Action
N/A
Submitted map to
enviEgn meEUl.rC,)&[e-mail]
N/A
Email map to
[e-mail]
Agency Response
Did not call because the
project area is not located in a
coastal area _
Site work will have no effect
on historic structures
Did not call because the
project area is not located in
i coastal area
The Site is not located within
or near NCWRC game lands or
any Significant Natural
Heritage Areas.
WRC is not aware of any
migratory pathways or critical
feeding areas for anadromous
fish species within or near the
Site.
i
The Hunts Fork watershed
likely supports a Piedmont
warmwater fishery.
Maintaining forested riparian
buffers and minimizing
impacts €rpm stormwa ter
runoff would help protect
water quality and aquatic
habitat within this watershed.
Instead of calling USAGE, NWI maps USFWS National Inventory
were reviewed for potential wetlands Maps do not show potential
within and adjacent to project area. wetlands.
2of2

Well ID
Sample Date
Depth to Water
(BTOC)
Tap of Casing JOC)
Elevation (feet)
Table
Water table Elevation
(feet msl)
3. Summary
Nitrate
(mg/L)
of Groundwater
Thomasville,
Nitrite
(m91L)
1
North Carolina
Total ltjeldahl Ammonia
Nitrogen (mg/L)
(mg/L)
Field Measurements
pH
(pH Units)
Specific
Conductance
(ms/cm)
TemperatureConductivity
C C)
(mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/1)
Turbidity
(NTU)
ORP
Formaldehyde
(µg/L)
MW-5
Dec-98
15.90
894M
878.93
0.87
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
ND
Nov-00
15.51
894.83
879.32
0.91
-
-
-
-
340
17.50
526
1.69
1.1
N❑
Sep-04
13.91
894.83
880.92
1.60
<0.1
<0.5
<0.1
5.03
264
76.01
314
3.34
22.38
-
-
Dec-04
14.11
894.83
880.72
1.90
<0.1
0.18J
<0.1
4.37
299
18.42
381
0.68
11.70
-
-
Dec-05
13.35
894.83
881.48
1.50
ND
3.90
0.11
4.56
0.434
19.11
354
1.79
91
-
-
Deo-06
13.81
894.83
881.02
1.10
tO.007
0.21
<0.003
4.97
0.374
17.56
319
7.75
5.1
-
Dec-07
16.03
894.83
878.80
1.00
<0.10
<0.50
<0.10
4.94
198
19.37
0.42
7.66
15
-
-
Dec-08
-
894.83
-
0.96
-
--
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Jan-10
13.30
894.83
881.53
1.2
-
<0.5
<0.10
4.73
0.46
17.16
366
1.43
0
-
Oct-10
15.05
894.83
879.78
1.6
a0.10
<6.5
<0.10
6.56
417
20.09
--
0.69
8
-19.5
-
MW-6
1992
-
-
-
130
-
_
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Nov-97
-
--
-
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
0.56
Dec98
11.30
877.31
866.01
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
18.0
Nov-00
10.36
877.31
866.95
58.9
-
-
-
-
633
15.30
573
2.15
0
-
ND
Sep-04
7.46
877.31
869.85
54.0
<0.1
11
20
4.35
512
17.42
344
6.38
10.02
-
-
Deo-04
12.93
877.31
868.28
52.0
0.0037J
9.70
21
5.15
794
15.00
294
0.80
93.20
-
-
Deo-05
5.26
877.31
872.05
60.0
0.12
23.00
17.00
3.99
0.747
15.11
404
0.00
122
-
-
Deo-06
6.48
877.31
870.83
42.0
r0.007
15.00
16
4.12
0.587
14.15
396
4.30
34.7
-
-
Deo-07
6.23
877.31
871.08
65.3
a0.10
9.9
<0.10
3.96
574
15.39
0.21
8.41
9
-
-
Deo-08
-
877.31
-
75.9
-
-
-
--
_
-
-
-
_
Jars-10
5.64
877.31
871.67
59.7
-
5.7
7.8
3.94
0.563
7.88
403
0.16
4.1
-
-
Oct-10
8.18
877.31
869.13
40.8
a1
5.5
9.0
7.14
440
17.64
-
0.75
7.9
0.2
-
MW-10
1992
-
-
-
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
Nov-97
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.28
Dec-98
17.96
881.21
863.25
59.0
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
Nov-00
17.21
881.21
864.00
75.2
-
-
-
5.41
820
15.20
299
0.99
0
-
ND
Sep-04
14.30
881.21
866.91
100.0
a0.1
<0.5
1.3
5.02
917
21.15
235
6.93
118.0
-
-
Dec-04
12.93
881.21
868.28
55.0
0.0068J
<0.5
0.82
5.15
794
15.00
294
0.80
93.2
-
-
Deo-05
12.82
881.21
868.40
73.0
ND
7.30
0.54
5.29
0.700
14.66
280
0.05
8
-
-
Deo-06
12.90
881.21
868.31
58.0
0.05
1.60
1.20
5.21
0.848
14.21
320
4.34
2.7
-
-
DeG07
14.04
881.21
867.17
49.7
a0.10
0.58
<0.10
5.35
505.00
1 15.50
0.156
6.31
9
-
-
Dec-08
--
881.21
-
53.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jan-10
11.75
881.21
869.46
58.7
-
c0.5
0.84
5.26
0.542
10.51
328
0.21
9.8
-
-
Oct-10
14.99
881.21
866.22
69.8
<1
c0.5
1.1
7.55
578
16.78
--
0.80
0.1
-53.6
-
MW-19
Dec98
12.08
885.75
873.67
65.0
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
300
Nov-00
11.83
885.75
873.92
39.4
-
--
-
6.17
760
15.60
240
1.19
7
-
ND
Sep-04
5.51
885.75
880.24
5.7
1 <0.1
6.6
1.4
5.34
111
19.61
150
2.70
43.97
--
-
Deo-04
4.50
885.75
881.25
5.7
0.0061J
2.50
2.40
4.90
134
13.64
279
0.75
100.90
-
Deo-05
3.83
885.75
881.82
30.0
0.13
14.00
5.00
5.39
0.408
13.72
258
0.11
64
Dec-06
4.85
885.75
880.90
7.3
c0.007
4.70
3.10
5.20
0.144
13.05
311
4.30
25.4
-
-
Dec-07
5.95
885.75
879.80
63.7
r0.10
4.7
<0.10
4.89
510
13.60
0.166
4.59
10
-
-
Dec-08
-
885.75-
Jan-10
3.88
885.75
881.87
18.9
-
5.1
3.5
5.04
0.239
8.01
320
9.45
0.2
-
-
Oct-10
5.10
885.75
880.65
4.0
<0.10
1.8
0.88
7.44
118.000
19.03
1.10
42.5
-35.8
-
1oft

Well I D
Sample Date
Depth to Water
(BTOC)
Top of Casing (TOC)
Elevation (feet)
Table
Water table Elevation
(feet msl)
3. Summary
Nitrate
(mg/L)
of Groundwater
Thomasville,
Nitrite
(mg/L)
Analytical Results and
North Carolina
Total Itjeldahl Ammonia
Nitrogen (mg/L)
(mg/L)
Field Measurements
pH
(pH Units)
Specific
Conductance
jmS/cmj
Temperature
CC]
Conductivity
(mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/1)
Turbidity
(NTU)
ORP
-1
Formaldehyde
(pg/L)
ND -
PMW-7
Dec-01
-
-
12.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.-
-
Sep-04
8.79
-
-
0.44
<0.1
0.6
0.3
5.24
281.4
28.90
163
7.79
38.96
-
Dec-04
7.54
-
-
4.6
0.009J
0.24J
<0.1
4.63
298
16.71
283
-
39.00
-
-
Dec-05
8.68
-
-
2.2
ND
8.2
0.11
4.70
0.365
17.18
318
0.00
28
-
Dec-06
8.17
-
-
0.44
<0.007
0.036
0.055
4.79
0.261
15.86
240
4.58
2.4
-
-
Dec-07
-
-
-
ND
-,0.10
0.53
<0.10
4.49
233
16.96
0.203
3.02
13
-
-
Dec-08
-
-
-
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
Jan-10
6.20
-
-
0.38
-
0.63
<0.10
4.48
0.215
14.50
308
0.96
12.1
-
-
Oct-10
10.26
-
-
<0.10
<0.10
0.75
<0.10
7.08
218
18.15
-
0.72
7.7
47.4
PMW-8
Deo-01
DRY
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5ep-04
11.14
-
-
0.1
<0.1
a0.5
<0.1
5.76
185.7
22.38
200
3.96
11.44
-
Dec-04
10.96
-
-
0.3
0.018
0.2J
<0.1
5.16
186
14.79
283
NA
98.10
--
-
Dec-05
11.70
-
-
ND
ND
9.8
0.12
5.61
0.212
16.57
280
0.00
43
-
-
Deo-06
10.21
-
-
0.25
<0.007
0.18
<0.003
5.43
0.193
15.61
236
4.07
2.3
-
-
Dec-07
-
-
-
ND
c0.10
0.67
<0.10
4.77
83
17.15
0.178
2.00
16
-
-
Dec-08
-
-
-
0.14
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
--
-
-
-
Jan-10
9.53
-
-
0.29
-
t0.5
<0.10
5.28
0.235
14.70
177
0.29
0
-
-
0ct-10
12.84
-
-
0.31
<0.10
<0.50
a0.10
7.27
235
17.73
-
0.48
5
-38.9
-
Data summarised from Corrective Action Plan prepared by URS Group dated March 2003.
Notes:
TOC = Tap of Casing
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
msl = mean sea level
mg/L = milligrams per Liter
m5/em - millisec per centimeter
' C = Degrees Centigrade
mv- millivolts
NTIJ = nephelometric turbidity tin
µglL = micrograms per Liter
ND- Not detected
J - Estimated concentration
<0A - less than the laboratory reporting limit
- = No information available
2of2

Sample Name
Sample Date
Nitrate
Alkalinity
Iron
Orthophosphate
Manganese
Sulfate
Chloride
TOC
Free Carbon
Dioxide gas
MW-5
Oct-10
1.6
<5
<0.005
<0.05
0.187
r5
109
1.9
150
MW-10
Oct-10
69.8
17.1
<0.005
<0.05
0.953
<5
4.7
3.6
130
MW-19
act-10
4.0
15.0
2.47
0.17
0.168
5.6
2.5
21.9
110
PMW-7
0ct-10
<0.1
17.1
0.377
1 <0.05
0.621
14.2
37.1
7.9
520
Notes:
All results presented in milligrams per liter
NA = Not Analyzed
TOC = Total Organic Carbon

Sample ID
Table 5. Summary of Su rf ace Water Sa mple Re suits
Former Ingram Plywood Site
CarolinaThomasville, North
Sample Date Nitrate Nitrite Total Kjeldahl
(mg/L) (mg/L) Nitrogen (mg/L)
Ammonia
(mg/L)
Upstream
2000
Sep-04
0.35
0.54
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dec-04
0.56
NA
NA
NA
Dec-05
0.62
NA
NA
NA
Dec-06
0.59
NA
NA
NA
Dec-07
0.45
NA
NA
NA
Dec-08
0.37
NA
NA
NA
Jars-10
0.65
NA
NA
NA
Oct 10
<0.10
<0.10
1.1
<0.10
Downgradient
2000
0.33
NA
NA
NA
Sep-04
0.44
NA
NA
NA
Dec04
0.44
NA
NA
IAA
Dec-05
0.53
NA
NA
NA
Dec-06
0.53
NA
NA
NA
Dec-07
0.53
NA
NA
NA
Dec-08
0.39
NA
NA
NA
_
Jan-10
0.65
NA
NA
NA
Oct-10
1.8
0.34
1.4
<0.10
Downstream
Sep-04
0.45
NA
NA
NA
Dec-04
0.45
NA
NA
NA
Dec 05
0.49
NA
NA
NA
Dec-06
0.46
NA
NA
NA
Dec-07
0.4
NA
NA
NA
Dec-08
0.39
NA
NA
NA
Jan-10
0.62
NA
40.5
<0.10
Oct-10
0.32
<0.10
1 0.62
<0.10
Historical data summarized from Corrective Action Plan prepared by URS Group dated March 2003.
Notes:
mg/L = milligrams per Liter
NA = Not Analyzed
<0.1 = less than the laboratory reporting limit

Results
Results
Results
Results
Results
Average
Well Name
Test Type
Test Type
,Average
Results
(ft/day)
(cm/sec)
(ft/day)
(cm/sec)
(ft/day)
cm sec
MW-6
FallingHead
1.3
0.000457
RIsing Head
0.921
0.000325
1.11
0.000391
MW-10
Falling Head
1.57
0.000553
Rising Head
1 2.14
1 0.000754
1.88 1
0.000654
MW-19
Falling Head
1.67
0.000587
Rising Head
1 1.27
1 0.000447
1.47 1
0.000517
Notes:
ft/day = feet per day
cm/sec - centimeter per second
1

Remedial Investigation Report
Appendix A: Lab Data

F r Pace Analytical Se Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc,
PaceAnalXical 2225 Riverside Or 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
nwr+paDmb2r com Asneville. NC 28804 IiuntersvlHe, NC 28078
[phone] {704)875-9092
November 10, 2010
Mr. Reinhard Ruhmke
Brown & Caldwell
5410 Trinity Rd
Suite 320
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Dear Mr. Ruhmke:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 27, 2010.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Godwin
kevi n. godwi n @ pa celabs . co m
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report snail not he reproduced. except in full,
without the written consee�n``a�t of PP�ace�e+'A`;nalyticaI Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 28

PaceAnalytical
wmie pacelabs. com
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Asheville Certification lds
2225 Riverside ❑r., Asheville, NC 28804
Connecticut Certification #: PH-0106
Florida)NELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification M. M-NC030
New Jersey Certification #: NC011
North Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 9
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37712
Pace Analytical Sr i, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
(828)254.717$
CERTIFICATIONS
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
Pennsylvania Certification #: 68.03578
South Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 99030002
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Virginia Certification #: 00072
West Virginia Certification #: 356
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
TNs report shall not he reproduced, except in full.
Without the written con stint of Pace Ana lytl cal Services, Inc..
It
Pace Analytical Sorvlces, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersviile, NC 28078
{704}8TS-9092
Page 2 of 28

a Pace Analytical 8ai Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceanalytrcal 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Klncey Ave. Suite 100
vx+vpscels�s.cnm Asheville. NC 288f)4 Huntersvllle. NC 28076
[phone] [phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Lab la Sample IQ Method
9280693001 MW•5 EPA6010
92BO693002 MW-10
32BD693003 MW-19
9280693004 PMW-7
9280693005 MW-6
9280693006 PMW•8
SM 23208
EPA 300.0
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.1
SM 53108
EPA 6010
SM 232013
EPA 300.0
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.1
SM 5310E
EPA 6010
SM 23208
EPA 300.0
EPA 350A
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.1
SM 5310B
EPA 6010
SM 2320B
EPA 300.0
EPA 350-1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 365.1
SM 53106
EPA 350A
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced. except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analyticel Services, Inc..
Analysts
SHB
DMN
EWS
EWS
JDA
DMN
DMN
RAB
SHB
DMN
EWS
EWS
JDA
DMN
DMN
RAB
SHB
DMN
EWS
EWS
JDA
❑MN
DMN
RAB
SHB
DMN
EWS
EWS
JOA
DMN
DMN
RAB
EWS
JDA
❑MN
EWS
JDA
Analytes
Reported
Laboratory
2
PASI-A
1
PASI•A
2
PASI-A
1
PASi-A
1
PASi-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASi-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI•A
1
PAS! -A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI•A
1
PASI•A
2
PASi•A
1
PASi-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASi-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASi-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
2
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
1
PASI-A
Page 3 of 28

PaceAnalAcal 4
x•�r�.�a�eh�as.Cr_.`
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Lab ID Sample ID
9280693007 DUP
9280693008 DOWNSTREAM
9280693009 DOWNGRADIENT
9200693010 UPSTREAM
92BO693011 SB2
9280693012 S135
9280693013 SB4
Pace Analytical S it, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, INC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Method
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
E PA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
EPA 350.1
EPA 351.2
EPA 353.2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written ccnsent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analyticat ServIcae, Inc.
9500 Kincey Ave Suite 100
Huntersvllle, NC 28078
[phone]
Analytes
Analysts Reported Laboratory
DMN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PAS! -A
OMN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PASI-A
DMN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PAS[ -A
JDA
1
PASI-A
DMN
2
PASk-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PASI-A
DMN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PASI-A
❑MN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PASI-A
DMN
2
PASI-A
EWS
1
PASI-A
JDA
1
PASI-A
DMN
2
PASI-A
Page 4 of 28

a Pace Analytical go Inc. Pace Analytical Serylcaa, Inc.
1�7
aceAnalytical 2223 Riversiae fir. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
w.vwpa'8'aas :Cm Asheville, NC 28904 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAIN PLYWOOO
Pace Project No.: 92BO693
Sample: MW-5
Lab Ifl: 9280693001 Collected: 10/26/10 11:00
Received 10/27/10 08 20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
OF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Oual
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Iron
NO ug/L
50.0
1
11/02/1017:50
11/03/1016:48
7439-89-6
Manganese
187 ug/L
5.0
1
11/02/1017:50
11103/1016:48
7439-96-5
2320B Alkalinity
Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
NO mg1L
5.0
1
11/03/10 20:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride
109 mg/L
10.0
10
11/09/10 17:51
16887-00-6 M6
Sulfate
NO mg1L
5.0
1
11/08/10 21:04
14808-79-8
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
NO mgJL
0.10
1
11/02/10 15:58
7664-41-7
351.2 Total KJeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 3511
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
NO mg1L
0.50
1
11/01/10 14:48
7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA353.2
litrogen, Nitrate
1.6 rng/L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:42
itrogen, Nitrite
NO rng/L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00A2
365.1 Orthophosphate as P
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
Orthophosphate as P
NO mglL
0.050
1
10/27/10 23:23
5310E TOC
Analytical Method: SM 53106
Total Organic Carbon
1.9 mg1L
1.0
1
11105/10 18:55
7440-44•0
ate: 11/10/2010 04.43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pacee� AnalyticaI Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 28

Pace Analytical S. s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalyfrcal 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. suite 100
wwwpacefabs.corn Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [704]875-9092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: MW10 Lab ID: 9280693002 Collected: 10126/1014:30 Received: 1012711008:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qual
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
iron
ND uglL
50.0
1 1110211017.50
11/03/10 16:52
7439-89-6
Manganese
953 uglL
5.0
1 11/02/10 17 50
11/03/10 16:52
7439-96-5
2320B Alkalinity
Analytical Method: SM 23208
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
17.1 mg/L
5.0
1
11/03/10 20:45
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride
4.7 mglL
1.0
1
11/08/10 22:15
16887-00-6
Sulfate
ND mg1L
5.0
1
11/08/10 22:15
14808-T9-8
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
1.1 mg/L
0,10
1
11/02/10 15:59
7664-41-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahi Nitrogen
Analyticai Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kleldahl. Total
ND mg/L
0,50
1
11/01/10 14:49
7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
69.8 mg/L
1.0
10
10128110 01:12
Nitrogen, Nitrite
N❑ mg/L
1.0
10
10/28/10 01:12
365.1 Orthophosphate as P
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
Orthophosphate as P
ND mg/L
0.050
1
10127/10 23:23
5310B TOG
Analytical Method: SM 53108
Total Organic Carbon
3.6 mg/L
1.0
1
11/05/10 19.20
7440-44-0
Date: 11/10/2010 04.43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
M1 �
Page 6 of 28

xK
rr
PkeAnalyticaI F
RV.'& 00CVaDs.00"'
Pace Analytical Se , Inc.
2225 kwo(side Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave Swte 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: MW-19 Lair ID: 9280693003 Collected: 10/26/10 15:30 Received: 10/27/10 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010 MET ICP
Iron
Manganese
2320B Alkalinity
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Chloride
Sulfate
350.1 Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia
351.2 Total Kjeldaht Nitrogen
Nitrogen, Kjeldahi, Total
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
'litrogen, Nitrate
litrogen, Nitrite
365.1 Orthophosphate as P
Orthophosphate as P
53108 TOG
Total Organic Carbon
Analytical Method EPA 6010 Preparation Method EPA 3010
2470 ug1L
50.0
1
11/02/10 17:50 11/03/10 16:55
7439-89-6
168 ug1L
5.0
1
11/02/10 17:50 11/03/10 16:55
7439-96-5
Analytical Method: SM 2320B
15.0 mg/L
5.0
1
11/03/10 20:45
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
2.5 mg/L
1.0
1
11/08/10 22 38
16887-00-6
5.6 mg1L
5.0
1
11/08/10 22:38
14808-79-8
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
0.88 mg1L
0.10
1
11/02/10 16:00
7664-41-7
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
1.8 mglL
0.50
1
11/01/10 14:50
7727-37-9
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
4.0 mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:59
NO mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/1000:59
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
0.17 mg1L
0.050
1
10/27/10 23:23
Analytical Method: SM 53108
21.9 mg1L
1.0
1
11105/10 19748
7440-44-0
ate: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fuil,
without the written cansenI of Paco AriaiytiCal Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 28

a= ;i
, Pace Analytical 5 s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Race A nalytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 91500 K,ncey Ave. Suite 100
wANpar:ahS.Ccr- Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, INC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: PMW-7 LabID: 9280693004 Coliected: 1012611013:30 Received: 10127/1008:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Lirnit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No- Lival
6010 MET IC
I ron
Manganese
2320B Alkalinity
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
300.0 tC Anions 2H Days
Chloride
Sulfate
350.1 Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia
351.2 Total Kiel daht Nitrogen
Nitrogen, Kleldahl, Total
353.2 Nitrogen, NO2fNO3 unpres
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Nitrite
365.1 Orthophosphate as P
Orthophosphate as P
5310B TOC
Total Organic Carbon
Date: 11/1012010 04.43 PM
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
377 ugfL
50-0
1
11/02/10 17:50 11/03/10 16:59
7439-89-6
621 ug1L
5-0
1
11/02/10 17750 11/03/10 16:59
7439-96-5
Analytical Method: SM 2320B
17.1 mg1L
5.0
1
11/03/10 20.45
Analytical Mathod: EPA 300-0
37A mg/L
5.0
5
11/09/10 15:03
16887-00-6
14.2 mglt
5-0
1
i1108110 23:49
14808-79-8
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
N❑ mglL
0-10
1
1110211016:01
7664-41-7
Analyticat Method: EPA 351.2
0.75 mglL
0.50
1
11/01/10 14:51
7727-37-9
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
N❑ mglL
0.10
1
10/28/1000:53
N❑ mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:53
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
ND mg/L
0.050
1
10/27/10 23:23
Analytical Method: SM 531013
7.9 mg1L
1.0
1
11/08/10 11:51
744044-0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
ThIs report shall not W reproduced, except in full,
without the wri[ten consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
c
Page 8 of 28

Pace Analytical Ser Inc, Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace,Analytrcal 2225 R-verside ❑r. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
nxw ::p^ 7ss crr. Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersvlile, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project. FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: MW-6
Lab ID. 9280693005 Collected: 10/26/10 15.00
Received: 10/27/10 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
9.0 mg1L
0.10
1
11/02/10 16:02 7664-41-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 3512
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
5.5 mglL
0.50
1
11/01/10 14:52 7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
40.8 mglL
1.0
10
10/28/10 01.14
Nitrogen. Nitrite
ND mglL
1.0
10
10/28/10 01.14
Ice: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall nol be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consenntooff PPaceeiAnalytical Services, Inc.
y.
1 eh&t.
Page 9 of 28

;
Pace Artalytical 5 s, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Ina.
PlaceAnalyfical
2225 Riverside Or
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
www.pwbs.ecm
Asheville, NC 28804
Htintersville, NC 28078
[phone]
[704]875.9092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No. 9280693
Sample: PIVIW-8
Lah ID: 9280693006 Collected: 10/26/10 13:00
Received: 10127110 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
❑F
Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
ND mglL
0,10
1
11102/10 16:03 7664-41-7
351.2 'total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Totak
ND mglL
0,50
1
11/01/10 14.53 7727.37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
0.31 "IL
0.10
1
10/28/10 00-48
Nitrogen, Nitrite
ND mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:48
Date: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shell nat be reproduced, except in full.
without the written consent of Pace
Analytical Services, Inc..
r14
Page 10 of 28

Pace Analytical Sei Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc,
> aceAnaly lca� a 2225 Rirnrbrue Dr. 9800 K ncey Ave. Suite 100
www,pacelabs.com Asheville. NC 28804 Huotersvrile, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: DUP
Lab ID: 9280693007 Collected: 10/26/10 11:00
Received: 10/27110 08:20 Matrix. Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. dual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
ND mg1L
0.10
1
11102/1016:05 7664.41-7 M1
351.2 Total Kjeldafil Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
ND mg/L
0.50
1
11/01/10 14:55 7727.37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
1.5 mgIL
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:44
Nitrogen, Nitrite
N❑ mg1L
0,10
1
1012811000:44
ate: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the Written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
rid
Page 11 of 28

/! J f x Pace Analytical St i, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
PiL'eARa+jjrlL'aI 2225 Rivars de Or. 9800 Kin coy Ave. Suite 100
I i
www.pacelets.cam Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: DOWNSTREAM Lab ID: 9280693008 Collected: 10126/1012:00 Received: 1012711008:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No,
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
NO mglL
0.10
1
11/02/10 16:09 7664-41-7
351.2 Total 1(jeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 3512
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
0.62 mglL
0.50
1
11/01/10 14.56 7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
0.32 mg/L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:46
Nitrogen, Nitrite
NO mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00:46
Date: 11110/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced. except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical SerVIC85, Inc..
y[
Dual
Page 12 of 28

a Pace Analytical Sei Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
i AceAnalyfrcal 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kin coy Ave. Suite 100
nuw.p�:rr,7es xr Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, INC 28078
[828]254.7176 [704j875-9092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER iNGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: DOWNGRADIENT
LablD; 9280693009 Collected: 10126/1010:55
Received. 1012711008:20 Matrix. Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
ND mg/L
0.10 1
11/02/10 16:11 7664-41-7 M1
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl. Total
1.4 mg1L
0.50 1
11/01110 14:59 7727-37-9
353.2 Nitrogen, NO2fNO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
1.8 mg1L
0.10 1
1012811000Al
Nitrogen, Nitrite
0.34 mg1L
0.10 1
10/28/1000:41
W 11/10/2010 04A3 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
without the written consent of PPace+Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 13 of 28

s Pace Analytical S- c, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
wwwpeaerstrscam Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone] (704)875-$092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: UPSTREAM Lab ID- 9280693010 Collected: 10/28/10 11:20 Received: 10/27/10 08.20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
350.1 Ammonia
Nitrogen, Ammonia
351.2 Total Kjeidahl Nitrogen
Nitrogen, Kjeidaht, Total
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Nitrogen, Nitrite
ISnCAi V11141lrii0Ir1fCK1;RrJ
Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed GAS No. Dual
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
ND mgIL 0.10 1 1110211016:12 7884-41-7
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
1.1 mg/L 0.50 1 11101/1015:00 7727-37-9
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
ND mg/L
ND rmg1L
0.10 1
0.10 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
10/28/10 00.45
10128/10 00:45
Page 14 of 28

Pace Analytical Be, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
-PaceAnaVical 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 KinceyAve. SLllte 100
vu v.parn!atrs ro- Asheville, NC 28804 HunlersVille, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Sample: SB2
Lab ID: 9280693011 Collected: 10/26/10 14:50
Received: 10/27/10 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Unils
Report Limit OF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
0.23 mg1L
0,10 1
11/02/10 16:14 7664.41-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
0.91 mg1L
0,50 1
11101110 15:01 7727.37.9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
14.3 mg1L
0.10 1
1012811000:57
Nitrogen, Nitrite
0.16 mg/L
0.10 1
10/28/10 00:57
}te: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Paoo AnalyticaI Services, Inc..
Page 15 of 28

aceAnalytical
www.p6ceiabs.cam
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Pace Analytical Se t, Inc.
2225 Riverside Or.
Asheville. NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical SorvIces, Inc.
9800 KIncey Ave. Sulle 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: SB5
Lab ID: 9280693012 Collected: 10/26/10 13:35
Received: 10/27/10 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
pF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
350.1 Ammonia
Analyticai Method. EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
6.0 mg/L
0.10
1
1110211016:16 766441-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
11A mg/L
0.50
1
11/01110 15:03 7727-37.9
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
3.5 mg/L
0.10
1
1012811000:54
Nitrogen, Nitrite
0.12 mg/L
DA0
1
1o12811000:54
Data: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This reparl shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written Consent of Pace AAnaMical Services. Inc..
4 1-1,
Page 16 of 28

e Pace Analytical So Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
a1!'ceAnalytica! 2225 Riverside ❑r. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
- WWWPaM;&b&WM Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersvlile, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Paco Project No.: 9280693
Sample: S84
Lab ID: 9280693013 Collected: 10/26/10 12.00
Received: 10/27/10 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
0.76 rq/L
0.10
1
11/02/10 16:46 7664-41.7
351.2 Total KJeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
Nitrogen. Kjeldahi, Total
4A mglL
0.50
1
11/08/10 12:03 7727-37-9 M1
353.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres
Analytical Method: EPA 363.2
Nitrogen, Nitrate
25.3 mg1L
0,10
1
1012811000.47
Nitrogen, Nitrite
1.0 mg1L
0.10
1
10/28/10 00.47
Re. 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 17 of 28
This report shall not W reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc

ace Analytical'
xwiv.pacels85.rcm
Pace Analytical 5 s, Inc.
2225 Riverside Or.
Asheville, INC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
QC Batch: MPRP)7351 Analysis Method: EPA 6010
OG Batch Method: EPA3010 Analysis Description: 6010 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003. 9280693004
METHOD BLANK: 521626 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Iron uglL ND 50.0 11/0311015,39
Manganese ug/L ND 5.0 11/0311015:39
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NG 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL. SAMPLE:
521627
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Iron
ug(L
5000
4900
98
80-120
Manganese
ug/L
500
496
99
80.120
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
521628
9280558001 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Iron
ug/L
2940 5000
7840
98
75-125
Manganese
ug/L
899 500
1360
92
75-125
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 521629
Parameter
Iron
Manganese
Date: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
9280558002 Dup
Units Result Result
ug/L 4280 4260
ug/L 329 327
RPD Qualifiers
1
1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written can sent of Pace Anal ylica1 Services, Inc..
40
Page 18 of 28

m Pace Analytical Se , Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside 6r 9800 Kinsey Ave Suite 100
wwwpamlabsxorn Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersviile, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
DUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
QC Batch: WET114325
Analysis Method:
SM 2320B
OC Batch Method: SM 23208
Analysis Description.
2320B Alkalinity
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004
METHOD BLANK: 522380
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001,
9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
mg1L ND
5.0 11/03/10 20:45
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
522381
Spike LCS
LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units Conc. Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
mg1L 50 52.9
106 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 522382
9280442002 Dup
Parameter
Units Result Result
RPD Qualifiers
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
mg/L 170000 ug/L
170 0
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 522383
9280442003 Dup
Parameter
Units Result Result
RPD Qualifiers
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
mg/L 312000 uglL
313 0
ate: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 19 of 28
This re part shah not he reproduced, except in full,
without the written con sentt of Pace
rAnalyticaI Services, Inc

aceArralytical
www.pamlabacom
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No,: 9280693
Pace Analytical S a, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: WETA18542 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003. 9280693004
Pace Analytical Servicas, Inc.
9800 KlnceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone]
METHOD BLANK: 524325
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002,
9280693003, 9280693004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Chloride
mg1L
NO 1.0
11/08/10 19:06
Sulfate
mg1L
NO 5.0
11108/1019:06
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
524326
Spike LCS
LCS °% Rec
Parameter
Units
Cone. Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
10 9.6
96 90-110
Sulfate
mgtL
30 30.5
1D2 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
524327
9280946003
Spike
MS
MS
°% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Cone.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
174
10
168
-62
90-110 M6
Sulfate
rr4L
102
30
139
123
90-110 M1
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
524329
9280693001
Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Cone.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Chloride
mg1L
109
10
112
31
90-110 M6
Sulfate
mg1L
NO
30
31.6
94
90410
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 524328
9280946003
pup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
174
164
6
Sulfate
mg/L
102
127
22 D6
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 524330
9280693001
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Chloride
mgJL
109
106
2
Sulfate
mg1L
NO
ND
Date: 1111012010 134:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 20 of 28

% A Pace Analytical 5e . Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
> WeAnalytiml 2225 Riverside Or. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
ww.v.pareists.cam Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] R704y675.9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: FORMER 1NGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
OC Batch: WETA18492 Analysis Method: EPA 350.1
QC Batch Method: EPA 350.1 Analysis Description: 350.1 Ammonia
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004, 9280693005. 9280693006
METHOD BLANK: 521189 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9260693002, 9280693043, 9280693004, 9280fi93005, 9280693006
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia mg/L N❑ 0.10 11102/10 15:36
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
521190
Spike LCS
LCS
% Rac
Parameter
Units
Canc. Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
5 4.8
96
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
521191
9280393002 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/L
15.2 5
23.8
173
90-110 M1
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
521193
9279951007 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/L
1.6 5
7.4
114
90-110 M1
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 521192
9279951006 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg1L
0.11 0.11
2
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 521194
9279951008 ❑up
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RP❑
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/L
ND ND
ite: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 21 of 28
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc

s
Pace Analytical Sr ;, Inc. Pace Analytica. l Services, Ine
• PaceAf 7n aVical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9500 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
www.pacelabS.com Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Prolecl: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
QC Batch: WETA18493
Analysis Method: EPA 350.1
QC Batch Method: EPA 350.1
Analysis Description: 350.1 Ammonia
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693007, 9280693008,
9280693009. 9280693010. 9280693011, 9280693012, 9280693013
METHOD BLANK: 521198
Matrix Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693007, 9280693008,
9280693009, 9280693010, 9280693011, 9260693012, 9280693013
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit Analyzed
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
ND 0.10 11102110 16:03
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
521199
Spike LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
5 5.0 100
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
521200
9280693007 Spike MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
NO 5 5.0
115
90-110 M1
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
521202
9280693009 Spike MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
NO 5 5.9
117
94-110 M1
SAMPLE {DUPLICATE: 521201
9280693008 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result RP❑
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
NO NO
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 521203
9280693010 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result RPD
qualifiers
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mglL
NO N❑
❑ate: 11110/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Ana lylicai Services, Inc..
Page 22 of 28

/7
aceAnalAcal ;
www.pacelabs.oar
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No,: 9280693
Pace Analytical Se . Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Hunteraville, NC 28078
[phone]
QC Batch: WETAI8481 Analysis Method: EPA 351.2
QC Batch Method: EPA 351.2 Analysis Description: 351.2 TKN
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004, 9280693005, 9280693006, 9280693007, 9280693008,
9280693009,9280693010,9280693011,9280693012
METHOD BLANK: 520667
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004, 9280693005, 9280693006. 9280693007.
9280693008,
9280693009,9280693010,9280693011,9280693012
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg/L
NO 0.50
11/01/10 14:39
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE.
520668
Spike LCS
LCs
% Rao
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec
limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg/L
10 9.1
91
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
520669
9280997008 Spike
MS
MS
% Rea
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rea
Limits Qualifiers
litrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg1L
16A 10
28.1
117
90-110 Mi
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
520671
9280693DN Spike
MS
MS
% Rea
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rea
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mglL
NO 10
9.4
90
90-1110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 520670
9280997009 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg/L
27-9 27-8
0
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 520672
9280693007 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg1L
ND NO
rtw 11/1012010 04.43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 23 of 28
This report shall not he reproduced, except in full,
wlthout the written eon sent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc
a.

fr
PaceAnalAcal
wxw paCShF,'v.7 C0.7:
Pace Analytical Se Inc.
2225 Riverside ❑r.
Asheville, NC 28804
(628y254.7176
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
QC Batch: WETA18521 Analysis Method' EPA 351.2
QC Batch Method: EPA 351.2 Analysis Description: 351.2 TKN
Associated Lab Samples. 9280693013
METHOD BLANK: 523525
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693013
Parameter
Units
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg1L
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
523526
Parameter
Units
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mglL
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
523527
Parameter
Units
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg/L
Matrix: Water
Blank Reporting
Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
NO 0.50 11/08/10 12:02
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
0800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huniersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
10 9.5 95 90-110
9280693013 Spike MS MS Ic Rec
Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
4.4 10 13.0 86 90-110 M1
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
523529
9280627003
Spike MS MS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg/L
ND
10 10.1 101 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 523528
9280583001
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
mg1L
2.3
2.1 6
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 523530
Parameter
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
Date: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
9280978001 Dup
Units Result Result
mglL 337 335
RP❑ Qualifiers
1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This rep on shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the wriIlei) consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
c c,p
Page 24 of 28

s
aceAnalj4ical
W*W.aacefe 3.com
Project FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
Pace Analytical Se Inc.
2225 Riverside Or.
Asheville, NC 28804
f8281254.7176
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Hunterswlle, NC 28078
[phone]
QC Batch: WETA18460 Analysis Method: EPA 3512
QC Batch Method' EPA 353.2 Analysis Description: 353.2 Nitrate + Nitrite, Unpres.
Associated Lab Samples: 92N693001. 9280693002. 9280693003. 9280693004. 9280693005. 9280693006, 9280693007, 9280693006.
9280693009,9280693010.9260693011,9260693012,9280693013
METHOD BLANK: 518986 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001. 9280693002. 9260693003. 9280693004. 9280693005. 9280693006, 9280693007. 9280693008.
9280693009,9280693010,9280693011,9280693012,9280693013
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate m91L ND 0.10 101281100023
Nitrogen, Nitrite mg1L NO 0.10 1012SM000:23
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
518987
Spike LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate
rn91L
5 5.4
108
90-110
Nitrogen, Nitrite
mg1L
1 1.0
104
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
518988
9280793003 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate
mglL
9.0 5
14.1
102
90-110
Nitrogen, Nitrite
mg1L
0.39 1
1-3
93
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
518990
9280793001 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate
mglL
8.1 5
15.3
143
90-110 M1
Nitrogen, Nitrite
mglL
DA0 1
1.4
100
90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 518989
9280793003 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate
mg/L
9.0 9.3
3
Nitrogen, Nitrite
mg1L
0.39 0.37
6
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 518991
9280793001 Dup
Parameter
units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Nitrogen, Nitrate
mg/L
8.1 8.5
5
Nitrogen, Nitrite
mg/L
0.40 0.40
1
rte: 11/10/2010 04:43 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 25 of 28
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Facee+AnalyticaI Services, Inc
y 1 1�CiL•

Pace Analytical S, 1, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
PaceAnalytical a 2225 Riverside Or 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wwwpace:C.Ds cc. Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersvills, NC 28078
[phone] [704y875-9092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project. FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
❑C Batch'. WETAI8459
Analysis Method:
EPA 365.1
QC Batch Method: EPA365A
Analysis Description.
365.1 Orthophosphate as P
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002,
9280693003, 9280693004
METHOD BLANK518974
Matrix: Water
Associated Lap Samples' 9280693001, 9280693002,
9280693003, 9280693004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
units
result Limit
Analyzed
Qualifiers
Orthophosphate as P
mg/L
NO 0.050 10f27110 23:23
,
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
518975
Spike LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conic. Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Orthophosphate as P
mg1L
.5 0.52
103
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
518976
9280693001 Spike
MS
MS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Orthophosphate as P
mg1L
NO .5
0.54
98 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 5115977
9280693001 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD
Qualifiers
Orthophosphate as P
mg/L
NO NO
[oFiZAi�ili[�1F��7i[�I►L� K�1�►,t
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This re part shall not he reproduced, except in full,
w0aut fhe writlen consent of pace Analytical Services, Inc..
cv,.
F e
Page 26 of 28

r' Pace Analytical Se Inc.
lsaceAnalytrca2225 Riverside Or.
www.Aacefabs.cn+r+
Asheville, NC 28804
{828y254.7178
DUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.: 9280693
QC Batch? WETA18518 Analysis Method: SM 5310B
QC Batch Method: SM 5310B Analysis Description: 531 OB TOC
Associated Lab Samples: 9260693001, 9280693002, 9280693003. 9280693004
METHOD BLANK: 523439 Matrix! Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9280693001, 9280693002, 9280693003, 9280693004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon mg1L N❑ 1.0 11/05/10 18:23
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
{704 }675-9092
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE; 523440
Spike LCS LCS % Roe
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon mg1L 25 24.2 97 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
523441
9280693001
Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
result
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
1.9
25
27.9
104
75-125
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
523442
9280693002
Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
units
Result
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
3.6
25
29.2
103
75-125
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 523443
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 523444
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
9280693003 Dup
Units Result Result
m91L 21.9 22.0
9280693004 ❑up
Units Result Result
mg1L 7.9 10.7
RPD Qualifiers
1
RP❑ Qualifiers
30 013
ste. 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Ins..
.cce.e
Page 27 of 28

f' r
PaceAnalyfrcal
n wa.G 4. erpn S. CC M
QUALIFIERS
Project: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
Pace Project No.-. 9280693
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Se , Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, tnt.
9800 Kincey Ave- Suite 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
{7D4}875.9092
OF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes In sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aiiquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MOIL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Dipheny1hydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guideI!nos, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and R P D values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(Q) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP • Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
INC - Not Calculable.
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphanylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current iist of accredited analyles.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace AnatyticaI Services -Asheville
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
❑b The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits.
M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.
M6 Matrix spike and Matrix spike duplicate recovery not evaluated against control limits due to sample dilution.
Date. 11/10/2010 04:43 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 28 of 28
This report small not be reproduced, except in full,
without the wrlIts n consent of Pare Arralyt+cal Services, Inc..

Client Name: Pace Analyticai Services
Contact: Kevin Godwin
Address: 9800 Kincey Ave
Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Lab Sample #
Client Sample ID
P101046"l
MW-5
P101D465-02
MW-10
Pi D10465-03
MV+1.19
P1010465-D4
PM11V-7
Page:
Lab Proj #:
Report Date:
Client Proj Name:
Client Proj #:
Pagel of 6
P1010465
11 /05/10
Former Ingram Plywood
9280693
Laboratory Results
Total pages in data packager
Microseeps test result meet a!I the requir menu of the tJ[ lAC standards or provide reasons andlor justi€icatIon if They do not.
Approved 8y:Date:
Project Manager: Heather Hauser
The analytical results reported here are reliable and usable to the precision expressed in this report. As required by some regulating authorities, a fuli
discussion of the uncertainty iri our analytical results can be obtained at our web site or through customer service. Unless otherwise specified, all results
are reported on a wet weight basis.
;e Narrative:
As a vaiued client we would appreciate your comments on our service.
Please call customer service at (4 12) 82 6 - 5245 or email customerservice a@microseeps. com.
220 William Pitt Way Pittsburgh, PA 15238 • Tct 412-826-5245 Fax [phone]
w6site www.microseeps.com email info microseeps.com

Client Name: Pace Analytical Services
Contact: Kevin Godwin
Address 9800 Kincey Ave
suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Sample Descri tion
MW-5
Page:
Page 2 of 6
Lab Proj #:
P1010465
Report Cate:
11/05/10
Client Proj Name:
Former Ingram Plywood
Client Proj #.
9280693
Matrix Lab Sample # Sampled DateMme Received
Water P1010465-01 26 Oct. 10 11:00 28 Oct. 10 8:57
Analytetsj Flag Result PQL Units Method # Analysis Date By
RiskAnalysis ., �..
N Carbon dioxide 150.00 5.00 mglL AM20GAX 11/4110 rw
F' Data Qualifiers: 3 • estimated value, U - Non detect' R - Poor surrogate recovery, M - Recovery1RPD poor for MSIM SD, SAM /DUP, B - detected
in blank, S - field sample as received did not meet NE LAC sample acceptance criteria, L - Subcontracted Lab used, N - WE LAC certified analysis
PA02-00538

Client Name: Pace Anaiytical Services Page: Page 3 of 6
Contact: Kevin Godwin Lab Proj #: P1010465
Address: 9800 Kincey Ave Report Date: 11/05/10
Suite 100 Client Proj Name: Former Ingram Plywood
Huntersville, NC 28078 Client Proj #: 9280693
Sample Description Matrix Lab Sample # Sampled Dateffime Received
MW-10 Water P1010465-D2 26 Oct- 10 14:30 28 Oct. 14 8:57
Anaiyte(s} Ftau _. Result_ PQL Units Method # Analysis Date BY
RiskAnatysis
N Carbon dioxide 130.00 5.00 mg/L AM20GAX 11 i41; 0 rw
ri."
Data Qualifiers: ] - estimated value, U • Non detect, R - Poor surrogate recovery, M - Recowy/M poor for MSIMSD, SAMPIDUP, B - detected
in blank, S - field sample as received did not me el ;TELAC sample aceeptance criteria, L - Subcontracted Lab used, N - NELAC certified analysis
PA02-00538

Client Name Pace Analytical Services
Contact: Kevin Godwin
Address: 9800 Kincey Ave
Suite 100
HUntersville, NC 28078
Sample Description
MW-19
Page:
Page 4 of 6
Lab Proj #:
P1010465
Report Date:
11/05/10
Client Proj Name:
Former Ingram Plywood
Client Proj #:
9280693
Matrix Crab Sample # Sampled DatelTime Received
Water P1010465-03 26 Oct. 10 15:30 28 Oct, 10 8:57
Analyte(s) _ , Flagg Result PQL Units Method # Analysis Date D
RiskAnaiysis - -
N Carbon dioxide 110.00 5.00 mgll_ AM20GAX 1114f10 rw
Data Qualifiers: i - estimated vaiue, U - Nan detect, R - Poor surrogate recovery, M - Rcw-very/RPD poor for MSIMSiD, 5AMPIDUP, E • detected
in blank, S - ficid sample as received did not meet NELAC sample acceptance criteria, L - Subcontracted Lab used, N • NELAC certiFcd analysis
PA02-00538

Client Name: Pace Analytical Services
Contact: Kevin Godwin
Address: 9800 Kincey Ave
Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Sample Description
PMW-7
Page:
Page 5 of 6
Lab Proj #:
P1010465
ReportDate:
11/05110
Client Pro! Name:
Former Ingram Plywood
Client Proj #:
9280693
Matrix Lab Sample # Sampled DatelTima Received
Water P1010465-04 26 Oct- 10 13:30 28 Oct. 10 8:57
Analyte(s) Flag Result POL Units Method # Analysis Date_ By
Ris kAnalysis
N Carbon dioxide 520.00 5.00 mg/L AM20GAX 1114110 rw
Data Qualifters� 1 - estimated value, U - Non dctecr, R • Poor surrogate sewvery, M - Recovery/RPO pear for NIVIMSO, SAND/DUP. B • detected
r in bian�, 5 -field samp?e as received did not meet NELAC sample acceptance criteria, I. • Subcontracted Lab used, N - NELAC certified analysis
PA02-00538

Client Name: Pace Analytical Services Page: Page 6 of 6
Contact: Kevin Godwin Lab Proj #: P1010465
Address: 9800 Kincey Ave Report Date: 11/05/10
Suite 100 Client Proj game: Former Ingram Plywood
Huntersville, NC 28078 Client Proj #: 9280693
Prep Method: In House Dissolved Gas Sample Preparation
Analysis Method: Analysis of Dissolved Permanent Gases in Water
M 101104003-MB
Result
TrpeSpikeConc_. RDL
Carbon dioxide
5.00
m&'L
5.00
M101104003-LCS
Result
TrueSpikeConc.
Carbon dioxide
12000
mglL
12930
M101104003-LCSD
Result
Trues ikeConc,
Carbon dioxide
130.00
me!/L
129.30
°/aRecoverV Ctl LifTlits
- NA
%Recovery Cti Limits
93.00 80 - 120
%Recovery CU Limits RPD RPD CO Limits
101.00 80 - 120 8.00 0 - 20
Outlined Results indicate results outside of Control lirrtl€s
' Data Qualifiers: J - estimated value, U - Non detect, R . Poor surrogate rceovcrp, M - RecoverylR D poor for MS/MSD, SA,M/OUP, B - detected
in blank, S . Cield sample as received did nol meet NELAC sample acceptance criteria, L - Subcontracted Lab used, N - NELAC certified analysis
PA02-00538

Chain of Custody
Workorder: 9280693
Workorder Name: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD
P/,ow V(" 'K
V
^4,
Results Requested 11/8/2010
ac,Mnal Acal
w#wpwalaftmm
wN110 11115V01 n
Kevin Godwin
Pace Analytical Charlotte
P.O. c-#Soho l
9800 Kincey Ave- Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
A,c ro 3ec-p
Phone �704)875-9092
Email: kevin.godWin@pacela .com
LAB USE ONLY
I
MW-5
1012612010 11:00
9280693001
Water
p-
2
MAO
10126=1014:30
9280693002
Water
3
MW-19
10126/2010 15:30
9280693003
Water
4
PMW-7
10126R6101130
92801393004
Water
5
L
Qdmmen s-
Transfers
Releped By
DateMme
Gcel y
09(,Mm.
I
Ik
15
Wednesday, October 27,2010 1:19:57 PM FMT-ALL-C-002rev.00 24NIarch2009 Page 1 of 1

PaceAnawical'
CHAIN-OF-CUS'i %juY I Analytical Request Document
The Chah-O-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Page:
Section A Section B Section C
Required Client lnfwa ''pion Required Project Information: Involce information:
Company: Report To: Attention:
O
A �w
Address:
Copy To:
F
Company Name: kd8Lh t
REGULATORY AGENCY
G
O
Redress.ftg 73 f jC_
I NPOES f GROUNDWATER ` DRINKING WATER
� UST I RCFL4 OTHER
Email To:
Purcr?ase Order No.:
Pace Quolo /� �h� �n`
PhoneFax:
Project Name: VW iv
r-e Prgtic
Site Location
��Ya w�
n,aH:
STATE:
Requested Due DatorrAT:
Project Number: f }1! A
L�UlV
P�� k Z 'Z g
Requested
Analysis
Filtered
[Y/Hj
!action D Matrix Cads
2
tsqulred�u�tlhfprrrt3twn ru.Trux r CQU
-
a
COLLECTED
Fresenrafives
i
drinking Water DW
Water 'NT
Waste Water W'N
a
ti
m
COMPOSRE
START
Cowosrrs
EN0.'G(N6
F
0
w
Z
Product P
SdUSohd SL
-
�
6
N
Y
SAMPLE !❑ a' °L
~
�~
AD
C
VVF
[A-Z. 0.9 f.-] AirpB AR
d
w
a
w
z
¢
F�
o
Sample IDS MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS
O
LAOtherS
V
DT
X
W
AM
w
<N
o
=
E
onrE
Tlu>
N
u
c
_=
z
r�
M
Ccm
z
z
m
2
w
0
Q
y
w
Pace Project Nv.l Lab I.O.
1
Rf
t 11vow,
OL
I
I
I
I
I
F
2k,
_
3
--
v
{I
i
C
J AAAA
lL 41—
`L
LIII
K-1
5
'Ml
w
w
�,�,
R
K
►y[a w►
0,
191
AMA rA 7
10
V w-
1 '
11
12
ADDfTVONAL COMMENTS
RELINQUISHED BY I AFFILIATION
HATE
TIME
ACCEPTED BY? AFFILIATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE CdNpITIONS
SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE
ORIGINAL
v
o
a
PRINT Name of SAMPLER: r,
D }
Y
SIGNATURE of SAIAPLER: DATE
IV�j 10
~
ir
(MMDlYY]�
1D
N
rn
'*rVO LiR NOW By 11ONS9 ota rrnm you era accep4ng Pace's NET 30 day payment tw.ra ar d agreeing to We "rge3 CIA 5% P6r month for art¢ mvoicaS nv: paid .0MLn 30 days. F-ALL-0-020rev.07. 15-Mav-2On7

A;:�aceAnaVical -
.ar mcdanx r:nm
CHAIN -OE -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document
The Chain-0f-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT- AN relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Page.
Section A Section B Section C
Required Client Infpmlabon: Required Project Infcrn-aFun. Invoice Intormatlon:
Company: `iV gn Report To• j
1377035
K e. --r_Attention: r
�y
Address:. /
Copy TO:
Company Name ■
REGULATORY AGENCY
Mx� �/
►..+ `
TC ►u3
Address:
L NPDES f GROUND WATER F- DRINKING WATER
r�rC
115T ! RCP.A OTHER 6�_
Emai3 To:
Purchase Order No-:
Pace Quote
f 'd
Project Name ��y
Phi
Site Location
j� ��
rrlane
�
srA re:
Requested Due DatertAT!
A
Project Number:
Pace PMFMS:
Requested
Analysis
Filtered
(YIN)
:action D Matrix Cedes
c
E
x
:equl-dLhent Irik nation MATRrx 1 CODE
o
2pp
COLLECTED
Preservatives
3
Onnkirg Water DW
r]
z
o
Water WT
�
wedte water ww
m
CptIPDSirS
srulr
COMPOSITE
EN0.YiRA6
U
w
2
Product P
W
q¢
$oIVSrAd SL
[�7
d
+f
}
OL
SAMPLE ID °iP@
w
WP
Q
►
o
(A-Z.0.91; 1 Aer AR
p
a
C
Q
F-
.e
53rn pie lDs MUST BE VNICiUE TissueTS
D
.T
Other OT
Other
x
p
N
D
0
M
DO?)
w
a
a.
0
0.
g
0
p
ui
r
3
72
m
N
DATE
OAT£
TIME
Q
m
u
c
_
z
S
cim
2
z
z
m
b
a
rt
Pace Project No.1 Lab Lq,
L{►
-
2
{{1►;"
35
4
L
I siv
4
-4;A 1
5
s
—
ny
k
9
16
11
12
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
RELINQUISHED BY 1 AFFILIAMN
DATE
TIME
ACCEPTED BY? AFFILIATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
At
11
ORIGINAL
SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE
V
C
C
o.
.6
_
g U ? m
PRINT Name of SAYIPLER: .Lr
�� trir
m
FIr
u
U' E
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER:
DATE Signed
{M1HIDDIYY}:
-nnpoftan . ..; thn form you are eccepwo Pace% NET 3b day payment lemma and aproemQ to Tale cftargen qr 1.5% per moron for —: i--- no�p d hill ;tn Tys F-ALL-Q-0Ztkev-Uf. 1 May-2t1U■

rt
'_.Pace.4nalyfical' Client Name. Project #_ 9a?-aG? 3
Where Received: Guntersville ❑ Asheville ❑ Eden
Courier: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ UPS ❑ USPS Cfient ❑ Commercial ❑ Pace Other ❑ • tional
Custody Seal on CoolertBox Present: ❑ yes n❑ Seals intact: ❑ yes ❑ no Pr0j. Due Date'
Proj. Name:
Packing Material: ❑ Bubble Wrap ubble Bags ❑ None ❑ Other
Thermometer Used: IR Gun: T809 Type of Ice: Blue {None .0-S­amples on ice, cooling process has begun
Temp Correction Factor: Add ! Subtract 0 C
Biological Tissue Is Frozen: Yes Na Date and lnit'ais of perso examining
Corrected Cooler Temp.: C og contents:
Temp should be above freezing to 6°C Comments:
chain of Custody Present: fires` ONO ONIA 1.
Chain of Custody Filled out: �i% ONO ❑WA 2,
Chain of Custody Relinquished: r2,rvs ONO ❑wA 3.
Sampler Name & Si nature on COC:
es ONc
❑NIA 4.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time:
es ONO
ONIA 5.
Short Hold Time Analysis (a72hr):
No
❑wA 6.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
❑Yes -&I ONIA 7.
3uffcient Volume:
OYekATc
ONIA &
CA "-J-f` tp► ,3 r
:orrect Containers Used:
es ONO
❑wA 9.
Y kZ'Ipkl,+-
-Pace Containers Used:
❑No
ONIA
;ontainers Intact:
�ve�s
Yes ❑No
❑ttlA 10.
'iltered volume received for Dissolved tests
❑Yes ONO
11.
Sample Labels match COC:
Oyes � ❑ruA 12.
F-_C VD L f- ' `
-includes date/time/lD1Analysis Matrix:
k!3 a f w k-tcA - 3 ►-� �4 �►
A containers needing preservation have been checked.
E�7-s ONO
❑wA 13.
di containers needing preservation are Found to be in
' -
Ye-s ❑Na
❑NIA
ompliance with EPA recommendation.
xcepliws: VOA. coliform• TOC, O&G, WI-DRO (water) ❑Yes ONo Inftial when completed
;amples checked for dechlorination: Yes 'ONO ❑NIA 14.
ieadspace in VOA Vials { >6mm}: es ❑No ONIA 15.
"rip Blank Present: ❑Yes ❑No NA 16,
-rip Blank Custody Seals Present ❑Yes ONO ❑
'ace Trip Blank Lot At (if purchased):
:lient Notification) Resolution: Field Data Required? Y I N
Person Contacted: Q,e; �, /� 4,�je a Date/Time: I 27 a
CommenW Resolution: ¢ ; ; ti � �C �, " +�•.e s kG
XURF Revie 1 ; Rate: d 7 p SRF Revii
Iota: Whenever a is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a
:ertification Office ( i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative• out of temp• incorrect containers)
LL _ ){Sate' f V l27/IC
t
this Form veil be sent to the North Carolina OEHNR
Ire
F-CHR-CS-003-rev.01

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
AES
November 03, 2010
Kevin Godwin
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincev Avenue, Suite 100
Huntersville NC 28078
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
RE. 9280693
Dear Kevin Godwin: Order No: 101 ON72
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 1 samples on 10/28/2010 10:30:00 AM
for the analyses presented in following report.
No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated
Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies
associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a
project Case Narrative.
AES' certifications are as follows:
-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water,
soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/1 I.
-AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),
Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)
effective until 09/01/11.
These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.
James Forrest
Project Manager
37H5 FRIMIM tiir+{ VI.W0.AI ■ All +tii•+. Cii „leer:+ 30340 ■ Ti i : (770)457-ST77 • VAX(770)457-8188
Page i of 6

Chain of Custody
w
rQ
0 Workorder: 9280693 Workorder Name: FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD Results Requested 11/8/2010
aceAnalytical
Report 1 Invoice To Subco-tract To
Re
uested Analysis
Kevin Godwin
Pace Analytical Charlotte P.Q. C 1¢ so yid $ _
9800 Kirlcey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Phone [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
V
Preserved Containers
U
n
Collect
Hem
Sarnple ID
Date/Time
Lab ID.
Matrix
!{
LAB USE ONLY
1
SE5-19
10/26/201013:45
9280693014
Solid
2
--
-
3
-
4
- -
5
-
Comments
Transfers
Re4rsed tay
Date/Time
Received By
DateMme
❑ /O � 10
1 �3
1
10 27
9zv
2
4
5
Wednesday, October 27. 2010 1:20:05 PM FMT-ALL-G002rev.00 24March2009 Page 1 of I

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Date: 3-Nov-10
Client:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Client Sample 1D:
S135.19
Project:
9280693
Collection Date:
10/26/2010 1:45;00 PM
Lob 1D:
101ON72-001
Matrix:
Solid
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Bate Analyzed Analyst
Limit Factor
Total Organic Carbon SW9060A Modified (SW9060 Modified)
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) BRL 500 mg/Kg-dry 137460 1 11l02/2010 12:54 GR
QuaUflen: Val ue exceeds mex im tart conlaminan llevel
BU Below reporting limit
If Ifolding limn for preporalwn or one lysis exceeded
N Anaiyte uol NELAC ceriified
B Analy to defected in the assvc is led mctfiud blank
> Gmater Then Result value
F Fstimaled [cmlue above quantllal ion range
5 Spike Recovery oalslde units due to motnx
Nary See care Rarrolm
NC Not con finned
Less Ihan Reaull value
Page 3 of 6

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.
Sampie/Cooler Receipt Checklist
Client
Work Order Number IVON 7z
Checklist completed by (A-'L
' 101Z ft3
Signature
Date
Carrier name: FedFx UPS Courier Client
US Mail Other
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Yes
Na _
Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping containerlcooter?
Yes _
No _
Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Yes
No _
Not Present
Containerrfernp Blank temperature in compliance? (4°C+2)* Yes _
No
'5' 11"
Cooler # 1 Cooler #2 Cooler #3
Cooler #4
Cooler# 5 Cooler ##6
Chain of custody present?
Yes _ —,-'
No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Yes f
No T
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Yes s
No _
Samples in proper containerlboltle?
Yes /
No
Sample containers intact?
Yes
No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
Yes
No
All samples received within holding time?
Yes !
No
Was TAT marked on the COC?
Yes
No
Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history?
Yes _
No _
Not Applicable
Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted _ t
Yes
, No _
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?
Yes ,
No _
Not Applicable
Adjusted?
—Checked by
Sample Condition: Good f Other(Explain)
(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes
_
No e
See Casc Narrative for resolution of the ikon -Conformance.
. Samples do net have to comply with the given range for certain parameters.
lt_1QuaIity Assurarice�Check Iists Procedures Sign-0fTTemplates\Check Iist0ample Receipt Cheaklistsl5ample Cooler Receipl_CheckIist
Page 4 of 6

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Date: 3-Nov-10
Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Project: 9280693 Dates Report
Lab Order: 1010N72
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
10ION72-001A S135-19
Collection Date Matrix Test Name
10/26/2010 1 A&DOPM Solid Total Organic Carbon
TCLP Date Prep Date Analysis Date
10/29/2010 11/02/2010
Page 5 of 6

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Project Name: 9280693
Workorder: 10I ON72
Date: 3-Nov- l0
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
Batchl D: 137460
Sample ID: MR-137460
Client ID:
Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 10/29/2010
Run No: 183691
SampleType: INBLK
TestCode: Total organic Carbon Sw""A Modified
BatchlD: 137460 Analysis Date: 11/02/2010
Seq No: 3925041
Analyte
Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD
RPD Limit (Na)
Total Organic Carbon JOC) BRL 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sample ID: L.CS-137460
Client 1D:
Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 10/29/2010
Run No: 183691
SampleType: LCS
TestCode: Totat organic Carbon sw9060A Modified
BatchlD: 137460 Analysis Date: 11/02/2010
Seq No: 3825042
Analyte
Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD
RPD Limit Qua]
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 2497 5U0 2420 0 103 70 130 0 0 0
Sample ID: 101ON72-OOIADUP
Client ID; SBS-19
Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 10/29/2010
Run No: 183691
SampleType: DUP
TestCode: Total Organic Carbon SW900A Modified
BatchlD: 137460 Analysis Date: 11/02/2010
Seq No: 382MMS
Analyte
Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD
RPD Limit Qua]
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) BRL 500 0 0 0 0 0 398.0 0 50
Qnalif em: > cre aler than Rota value
BRL Selew reporting Itmif
7 Emimated value datecrW below Reporting Limit
Rpt Lim Repmbag Limit
le6of6
Less than Result value
E Esdmsted (value abovr gw:Yit.tion range)
N Analyte not NELAC oersified
S Spike Rccwcry ouluk limits due to matrix
B Analyze detaued in the aswiated method blank
H Holdm$ Lima: For VnI armm or analyws cxcccdal
R RPD antride limits due to matrix

Remedial Investigation Report
Appendix B: Boring Log

B R A W N A N D BORING LOG
C A L D W E L L
Project Name: Former Ingram Plywood Site: Thomasville NC Project Number: 140089
Sod Boring ® Hand AunerBorina ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Bonn IlNell Number. SBA Sheet __L of
Boring Location: See site map
Elevation and datum.
Drilling Contractor Geologic Exploration
Driller. Gary S.
Date Started: 10-26-10
Date Finished: 10-26-10
Completed
Water Depth (Feet):
drilling Equipment- GeoProbe 662Q OT
Borehole Diameter: 2"
Depth. (feet) 12.0
Slat KlF", EncoL"wed
Sampling Method: Push Probe
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Type and Diameter
Drilling Method: Push Probe/HSA
Drilling Fluid: nla
of Well Casing -
$ackfili Materal: BentonitelConcrerte
__
Slot Size:
Filter Material:
Logged By: KAS
Checked By: RR
Development Method:
Graphic Log
w
d
n
>
a
_
Q
d
=
n
T
r°
description
H
_
O
a
Ql
L F
Remarks
m
(group name, gradation J%wavel. %%ands, Vries]
o
m
N
m
V)
- F FL
a y
a
rn
nn nsem wkI r, G Ior, soil thyactenstKAj
m
,7
0 V
w
PPM
Orange -tan Clayey SILT, damp
x x
x
x
x _ ><
x
x" x
x
■
x --- x
5 ..
x
% ■
x ><
x
�c-
Y
Tan -gray fine SAND, some silt, damp
0
10
k "
x
Orange tan Clayey SILT, damp
x
0
Push Probe and HSA refusal at 12 feet below grade-
15

B R O W N A N D BORING LO
C A L A R E L L
Project Name: Former Ingram Plywood Site: Thomasville, NC _
Soil Barin ® Hand Au r Barin ❑ Monitoring Well❑ Boring/Well Number.
Project Humber:
14GO89
S6-2 Sheet --L of
Boring Location: See site map
Elevation and Datum:
grilling Contractor- Geologic Exploration
Driller: Garry S.
Date Started: 10-241-10
Date Finished: 10-26-10
Completed
Water Depth (Feet):
Drilling Equipment: GeoProbe 6$20 DT
Borehole Diameter: 2"
Depth: (feet) 14.0
ataticiFint Encknarad
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Sampling Method: Push Prods
Type and Diameter
Drihing Method: Push Probe Drilling Fluid: n!a
of Well Casing_
Backfill Material: Bentonite/Concrete
Slot Size: Filter Material:
Logged By: KAS Checked By: RR
Development Method:
Graphic
Log
T C d
n 'o y
4 va
Description v n a
rn
o g o S Remarks
(group name, gradation (%gra"L %sands, VOW)0
cafw. color, soil chandarWwt
a d
N munaer
PPM
Orange -tan Clayey SILT, little fine sand, damp
x x
— x
x
_ _ _
Gray range Clayey SILT, damp
— x
x
x x
x
-x-
x
— x
x
Orange -tan fine to medium SAND, some silt, damp
x %
x
x
x'.
x
x
x -
x.
•x
14
x
X.
x
x
x,
•x
x x
Tan Clayey SILT, damp
x
x
� x
Push Probe refusal at 14 feet below grade.
15

B R O W N A N D BORING LOG
C A L➢ W E L L
Project Name: Former Ingram Plywood Site: Thomasville, NC Project Number 140089
Soil Boring ® Hand Auger Borin ❑ Monitoring WOE Borin /Well Number SB-3 Sheet of
Boring Location: See site map
Elevation and Datum:
Drilling Contractor: Geologic Exploration
Driller Gary S.
Date Started: 10-26A0
Date Finished: 10-26-10
Completed
Water Depth (Feet):
Drilling Equipment: GeoProbe 6620 DT
Borehole Diameter. 2"
Depth: (feet) 14.0
Stettclr in! Fnc tared
Sampling Method. Push Probe
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Type and Diameter
Drilling Method: Push ProbelHSA
Drilling Fluid: nla
of Well Casing:
Backfill Material: Sentonite/Concrete
Slot Size: Filter Material:
By l(AS Checked By7 RR
Development Method:
Graphic Log
rLoged
m
q
T
r
o
�
=
r°
Description
p
U
EL
a
T
$'
O
Z
❑ m
Remarks
a
U
(groupname, gradar•m t %graver. %sands. %6n4s)
n
m
m
�
rn
E
a
Or
Lr)
mvn sal color• mice, sail rharaclerisNrs}
m
f/7
[I]
J
00
�
M U
PPM
Tan Clayey SILT, damp
xx x
x
x x
x.
-r
0
Orange -tan Clayey SILT, damp
x x
x
x x
x
�
5
�
x
x
x
x
x
ax
x
H x
x
x
o
l a
x
xx
Tan -orange fine to medium SAND, some sift, damp
a
Push Probe and HSA refusal at 14 feet below grade
l5

D R 0 W N AND BORING LG
C A L D W E L L
Project Name. Farmer Ingram Plywood Site: Thomasville, NC
Soil Boring ® Hand Auger Boring ❑ Monitoring Well❑ BohngMell Number:
G
Project Number. 140089
5B-4 Sheet of !
Boring Location:
See site map
Elevation and Datum:
Drilling Contractor:
Geologic Exploration
Driller:
Gary S.
Date Started: 10-26.10
Date Finished: 10-26-10
Completed
Water Depth (Feet):
Drilling Equipment:
GeoPlobe 6620 DT
Borehole Diameter:
2"
Depth. (feet) 6.0
SialrcJFvstEncaunterad 5.0
Sampling Method.
Push probe
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Type and Diameter
Drilling Method:
Push Probe
Drilling Fluid: nla
of Well Casing:
Backfiil Material?
BentonitelConcrete
Slot S¢e:
Filter Material:
Logged By. KAS
Checked By: RR
Development Method.
Graphic Log
n
w
y
r
c
o
T d 0
0
r
Description
O
c t
V
tT
a e ;, ❑ .r= Remarks
CL N
(9f0upn2M0. gradalgn I%grayer, %sands, %fl"U5l
O
M
c l m
E y
VU]
rnun DO?CiGf COiDF_s fCtW& lBnslfca)
m
fA
J R tY
m
pPlvl
Tan -orange SILT, some fine silt, trace clay, damp

BROWN AND BORING LOG
C A L D W E L L
Project Name: Former Ingram Plywood Site: Thomasville NC Project Number.
Soil Boring ® Hand Auger Boring ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Boring/Well Number. SB"S
140089
Sheet of 1
Boring Location: See site map
Elevation and Datum:
Drilling Contractor: Geologic Exploration
Driller. Gary S.
Date Started: 10-26-10
Date Finished: 10-26-10
Completed
Water Depth (Feet):
Drilling Equipment: GeoProbe 6620 DT
Borehole Diameter. 2"
Depth: (feet) 19.0
SWWFril EnWt""d 14.0
Sampling Method. Push Probe
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Type and Diameter
Drilling Method: Push Pro6eMSA
Drilling Fluid: nla
of Well Casing:
8ackfill Material: BentonitalConcrete
Slot Size:
Filter Material:
Logged By. KAS Checked By: RR
Development Method:
Graphic Log
d
Description
a
o
$'
_
�'
Remarks
❑
(Rwp nair, W*cWt on [%prowl. %vends. %feral
drrodwnvksa
m
m
m
.= a
d
�j
7
mtnss# color, color, and
p
m iiJJ
PPM
Orange -tan Silty CLAY, damp
x x
_ x
x
� x
-�r
x x
Tan fine SAND, some silt, damp
x
x'.
p
•x
S
x'.x,
Tart -gray fine to medium SAND, some siR, damp
x.
x •x
•
x-
x
' x _
x "
_ x
Orange -brown Clayey SILT, damp
x
x
lU
-�
Could not extract soil from sampling tube due to hard
soil.
]5
Orange -brown Clayey SfLT, little rock fragments, moist
(Description based on soil cuttings from HSA)
HSA refusal at 1 g feet below grade.

Remedial Investigation Report
Appendix C: Historical Groundwater Data

Well ID Sample Date
Depth to Water
(eTOC)
Tap of Casing (TOC)
Elevation {feet}
Table
Water table Elevation
{feet msl}
C- I - Summary
Nitrate
(mg/L)
of Historical
Thomasville,
Nitrite
(mg/L)
�nalytical Results and
North Carolina
Total Ftjeldahl Ammonia
Nitrogen {mg/L}
(mg/L.)(mS/cm}
Field Measurements
pH
(pH Units)
SpecificTemperature
Conductance
( Q
Conductivity
(mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/I}
Turbidity
(NTU)
ORP
Formaldehyde
(µg/Q
MW-1 Nov-00
-
-
--
ND
-
-
-
6.27
341.000
16.30
-26
1.47
8
-
ND
Mw-5
Dec-98
15.90
894.83
878.93
0.87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
ND
Nov-00
15.51
894.83
879.32
0.91
-
-
-
-
340
17.50
520
1.69
1.1
ND
Sep-04
13.91
894.83
880.92
1.60
<0.1
c0,5
<0.1
5.03
264
76.01
314
3.34
22.38
-
-
Dec-04
14.11
894.83
880.72
1.90
<0.1
6.181
<0.1
4.37
299
18.42
381
0.68
11.70
-
-
Deo-05
13.35
894.83
881.48
1.50
NO
3.90
0.11
4.56
0.434
19.11
354
L79
91
-
-
❑eo-06
13.81
894.83
881.02
1.10
<0.007
0.21
<0.003
4.97
0.374
17.56
319
7.75
5.1
Dec07
16.03
894.83
878.80
1.00
<0.10
<0.50
<O.10
4.94
198
19.37
0.42
7.66
15
--
-
Deo-08
-
-
-
0.96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jan-1O
13.30
894.83
881.53
1.2
-
c0.5
<0,10
4.73
0.46
17.16
366
1.43
0
-
-
Oct-10
15.05
894.83
879.78
1.6
t0.10
<0.5
<0.10
6.56
417
20.09
-
0.69
8
-19.5
-
MW-6
1992
-
-
-
130
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
Nov-97
-
--
--
-
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
0.56
Dec-98
11.30
877.31
$66.01
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
18.0
Nov-00
10.36
877.31
866.95
58.9
-
-
-
-
633
15.30
573
2.15
0
-
N❑
Sep-04
7.46
877.31
869.85
54.0
G0.1
11
20
4.35
512
17.42
344
6.38
10.02
-
-
Dec-04
12.93
877.31
868.28
52.0
0.0037.1
9.70
21
5.15
794
15.00
294
0.80
93.20
-
-
Deo-05
5.26
877.31
872.05
60.0
0.12
23.00
17.00
3.99
0.747
15.11
404
0.00
122
-
-
Deo-06
6.48
877.31
870.83
42.0
<0.007
1 15.00
16
4.12
0.587
14.15
396
4.30
34.7
-
-
Deo-07
6.23
877.31
871.08
65.3
<0.10
9.9
<0.10
3.96
574
15.39
0.21
8.41
9
-
-
Dec-08
-
-
-
75.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
_
Jan-10
5.64
877.31
871.67
59.7
-
5.7
7.8
3.94
0.563
7.88
403
0.16
4.1
-
-
Oct-10
8.18
877.31
869.13
40.8
a1
5.5
9.0
7.14
440
17.64
-
0.75
7.9
0.2
-
MW-10
1992
-
-
-
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nov-97
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
_
-
0.28
Dec98
17.96
881.21
863.25
59.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
Nov-00
17.21
881.21
864.00
75.2
-
-
-
5.41
820
15.20
299
0.99
0
--
ND
Sep-04
14.30
881.21
866.91
100.0
<0.1
<0.5
1.3
5.02
917
2L15
235
6.93
118.0
-
-
Deo-04
12.93
881.21
868.28
55.0
0.0068J
<0.5
0.82
5.15
794
15.00
294
0.80
93.2
-
Dec-05
12.82
881.21
868.40
73.0
N❑ 1
7.30
0.54
5.29
0.700
14.66
280
0.05
8
-
Dec-06
12.90
881.21
868.31
58.0
0.05
1.60
1.20
5.21
0.848
14.21
320
4.34
2.7
-
-
Dec-07
14.04
881.21
867.17
49.7
<0.10
0.58
<0.10
5.35
505.00
15.50
0.156
6.31
9
-
-
Dec-08
-
-
-
53.1
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
Jan-10
11.75
881.21
969.46
58.7
-
<0.5
0.84
5.26
0.542
10.51
328
0.21
9.8
-
-
Oct-10
14.99
881.21
866.22
69.8
c1
t0.5
Li
7.55 1
578
16.78
-
0.80
0.1
-53.6
-
MW-18
Dec-98
14.38
885.22
$70.84
2.81
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
Nov-00
-
-
-
2.62
-
-
-
-
163.000
16.90
464
1.66
0.2
-
ND
MW49
Dec-98
12.08
885.75
873.67
65.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
300
Nov-00
11.83
885.75
873.92
39.4
-
-
-
6.17
760
15.60 1
240
1.19
7
-
ND
Sep-04
5.51
885.75
880.24
5.7
<0.1
6.6
1.4
5.34
7.11
19.61
150
2.70
43.97
-
Dec-04
4.50
885.75
881.25
5.7
0.00611
2.50 1
2.40
4.90
134
13.64
279
0.75
100.90
--
-
Deo-05
3.83 1
885.75
881.82
30.0
0.13
14.00
5.00
5.39
0.408
13.72
258
0.11
64
Dec-05
4.85
885.75
880.90
7.3
c0.007
4.70
3.10
5.20
0.144
13.05
311
4.30
25.4
-
-
Dec-07
5.95
985.75
879.80
63.7
<0.10
4.7
<0.10
4.89
510
13.60
0.166
4.59
10
-
-
Dec-08
-
--
-
11.1
Jan-10
3.88
885.75
881.87
18.9
-
5.1
3.5
5.04
0.239
8.01
320
9.45
0.2
-
-
Oct•10
5.10
885.75
880.65
4.0
<0.10
1.8
0.88
7.44
118.000
19.03
-
1.10
42.5
-35.8
-
Page 1 of 2

Well ID
Depth 4Water
Sample Date
(BElevation
Tap of Casing JOC)
(feet)
Table
Water table Elevation
(feet msl)
C 1, Summary
Nitrate
(mg/L)
of Histori"I
Thomasville,
Nitrite
(rnjVQ
Analytical Results and
North Carolina
Tote! IC}eldahl
Ammonia
Nitrogen
(mg/L) (mg/L)
Field Measurements
pH
(pH Units)
Specific
Conductance
(MS/CM)
Temperature
CQ
Conductivity
(mV)
Dissolved Oxygen Turbidity
(Mg/1) (NTU)
ORP
Formaldehyde
OWL)
MW-20
Dec-98
i
884.85
873.74
4.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
_
-
-
ND
Nov-00
-
-
1.56
-
-
-
5.41
150.000
16.10
340
3.04
0
-
ND
RW-2
Nov-97
--
-
-
35
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
Nov-00
12.91
874.34
861.43
34.4
-
-
5.28
404.000
16.00
260
2.21
to
-
ND
RW-3
Nov-97
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nov-00
6.53
873.02
866.49
1.95
-
-
-
-
231.000
15.10
322
1.48
9.1
-
ND
PP-1
1992
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nov-00
-
-
ND
-
-
-
4.830
295.00
16.4
182.00
4.5
9.3
-
ND
PP-2
1992
-
-
-
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
--
Nov-00
-
-
-
1.82
-
-
-
988.000
13.10
305
3.99
8
-
ND
PMW-3
Nov-00
-
-
-
1.59
-
-
-
5.54
207.000
1L40
310
2.00
3
-
ND
PMW-5
Nov-00
-
-
1.66
-
-
5.50
1 192.000
13.10
305
3.99
8
-
ND
PMW-7
Dec-01
-
-
-
12A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
ND
Sep-04
8.79
-
-
0.44
<0.1
0.6
0.3
5.24
281.4
28.90
163
7,79
38.96
-
_
-
Dec-04
7.54
-
-
4.6
0.009)
0.24J
a0.1
4.63
298
16.71
283
--
39.00
-
-
Dec-05
8.68
-
-
2.2
ND
8.2
0.11
4.70
0.365
17.18
318
0.00
28
-
-
Der-06
8.17
-
-
0.44
c0.007
0.036
0.055
4.79
0.261
15.86
240
4.58
2A
-
Dec-07
-
-
-
ND
<O.10
0.53
<0.10
4.49
233
16.96
0.203
3.02
13
-
-
Deo-08
-
-
ND
-
_
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
_
Jan-10
6.20
0.38
-
0.63
t0.10
4.48
0.215 1
14.50
308
0.96
12.1
--
-
Oct-10
10.26
-
a0.10
a0.10
0.75
<0.10
7.08
218
18.15
-
0.72
7.7
47.4
PMW-8
Dec-01
DRY
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
_
Sep-04
11.14
-
-
0.1
<0.1
s0.5
a0.1
5.76
185.7
22.38
200
3.96
11.44
-
Dec-04 1
10.96
-
-
0.3
0.018
0.2.1
c0.1
5.16
186
14.79
283
NA
98.10
-
-
Dec-05
11.70
-
-
N0
ND
9.8
0.12
5.61
0.212
16.57
280
0.00
43
-
-
Dec-06
10.21
-
-
0.25
<0.007
0.18
<0.003
5.43
0.193
15.61
236
4.07
2.3
-
-
Dec-07
-
-
-
ND
t0.10
0.67
c0.10
4.77
83
17.15
0.178
2.00
16
-
-
Deo-08
-
-
-
0.14
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
Jan-10
9.53
-
-
0.29
0.31
-
<0.101
t0.5
a0.50
c0.10
<0.10
5.28
7.27
0.235
235
14.70
17.73
177
-
0.29
0.48
0
5 1
-
-38.9
-
-
Oct-10
12.84
-
-
Data summarized from Corrective Action Plan prepared by LIRS Group dated March 2003.
Notes:
TOC = Top of Casing
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
msl = mean sea level
mg/L = milligrams per Liter
m5/cm = miliisec per centimeter
' C - Degrees Centigrade
mv- millivolts
NTU = nephelometric turbidity unit
µg/L = micrograms per Liter
ND = Not detected
1 = Estimated concentration
<0.1 = less than the laboratory reporting limit
- = No information available
page 2 of 2

Remedial Investigation Report
Appendix D: Time vs. Concentration Graphs and
Hydrographs

100.0
95.0
90.0
85.0
H 80.0
i
t
r 75.0
a
t
70,0
e
65.0
60.0
55.0
870.00
E
e
V
a
868.00 t
0
n
866.00
—W— Nitrate
864.00 concentration
in mg/L
-f- Water
Elevation
862.00
39 860.00
Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
Date

73.0
i.1l11111
53.0
N
i 43.0
t
r
a
t 33.0
e
23.0
13.0
3.0 1
Dec-98 Dec-99
J
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07
Date
882.00
E
e
880.00 v
a
t
0
878.00 n
876.00
• N itrate
concentration
in mg/L
--*—Water
Elevation
874.00
Mypxff
--, - ` �- 870.00
Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10

Remediai Investigation Report
Appendix E: Slug Test Data

Yo = 0.59
Y
m
Yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW 6 (Slug in)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
tw 2.9
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and SettingslrruhrnkelMy DocumentslWorking fileslUSI RI ReportlDeliverablelApp E slug test resultslingram_MW-6_Slug_Test Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONKNED AQUWERS
Equruore 1 Hydnulie Cvrrd.eowry K Units
h r_1ln�@,Ir-1 1 in y 9.fyDE-04 ftlmin WELL ID MW-G Test M - Slug in
t y, 1.3SIE+pp ftldxy 5ITENY.iME former Ingram Plywood Site
4.57E-0$ cm/scc C12YISrATE Thomasville, NC
JOBNUAWER t40089
where: 4'ar7ahics
ti = Hy'drsuflc cunductivuty n-0tlt18997 ft/min
y = y at time xem 0.59 Feet
Smallest lug ry'c y, = y at time "t" M fret
11 = lcngTh of screen 15 feet ■
Nerd to caleula r, = Radius+ of well easing 025 feet 3 -
Mzikr semen let I- = Tkiekness of aquifer 15 feet ■ �� } � f
In R, jr.- = 1,gpalia r 1' 3-22237G8 t �p H !r
t = dine at y, i 7 min. 11 ■
t•
£squadon 2 [ I -
1n K/r, - i.i C In k/K
+ r.
WhCre. C = Sce Fig. 2 (Bouwu & Rice) 11.16 2.5 0 a ~a m ioq eao wae`� r . sx. l
r, = Radio ofbumhoic O.YS feel Fig. 2. I]imensionless parameters A, B, and C as a function
s Ir, _ fill of Lolrw for caiculatton of in(Rg/rw).
Notes:
`R, is the effmuvc radial distance over which y is diseipared and r is the radius of htircholc
bra is equal to r, (equivalent radius) when waver level is within weD xrmn
Sourct:
Bouwcr, H_, May Ju a 1989. "The Bouwer and Rice Slug Tmt - An Updatr", GROUNDWATER, Vny. 27. No. 3,
C:%Dmuments and SettingsVrvhmkeWy ❑ocumentSlWorkirig fileMUSI RI ReportldeiiverablelApp E siug test resul[slingram_MVV-b_Slug Test_Analysis- Bouwer.xlsx

Yo = 0.87
m
Yt = 0.8
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW 6 (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
Time (T) (ruin)
t= 0.88
CAI)ocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy DocumentslWorking files\US1 RI Reporl:MeiiverabWApp E slug test resultslingram_MW-6_Slug_7est_Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equadvo 7 Hydraulic Conductivity
K = 4 JnC[LLr.1 1 In Y
21, I Y.
where
Equadoa 2
where:
9 =
140rau11c conductmty
Y. =
Fit rime 71ctn
Y. =
y at time "t"
t' _
Length of screen
4
Radius of Nell casing
L. =
Thickness of aquifer
In R,/r.. =
hq#alm 2-
t =
time at y,
In R,/r. _ +r
K Units
6.40><D4 Fe/rnin
4.21E-01 ft/dav
3.25E 04 cm/sec
Vanahlcs
IU UU6399 ft/ min
DA7 Fat
0,8 port
15 feet
O,ZS feet
1 S feet
3.2223�G8
O.88 man.
In R.,/r.. _
3.2223768
C = Ste Fir. 2 (Bou%va & Riec) p.16 2.5
= Radius of borehetle 0.25 fcn
Itlar = Gsr
Not":
`R, is the tIfeetive radiai distance over which y is dismpated and r is the radius of btneholc
°r, is equal to rr [equdvaient radius] when wutrr level is within w4 screen
Source:
Bouwcr, H., Mi} ]une 1989, "the &auwcr and Rice Slug Text - An Updatr", GROL'NDWATER, Vol. 27, No. 3.
WELL ID
MW-6 Test 92 - slug removal
S TENAME
Former Ingram Plywood Site
CM MA TE
Thomasville, NC
JOB AVMBER
140004
wp �
F I �
.�- _
L
C• Sy .�6 _ � _-tC0 sG0 tOCO S7C•7- ,
Fig. 2. Dimensianless parameters A. 8, and C as a functtun
4I Leir,N far caIcuIatton of IniR prwi.
C:Qocuments and SettingslrruhmkeWly DocumentslWorking files%USI RI ReportlDeliverablOApp E slug less resu1tslingram_MW-8 Slug Test_Analysis-8auwar.xM

yo = 0.54
r
m
m
w
yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-10 (Slug in)
BOUWER & RIGE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 3.9
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and Settings\rruhmkeft ❑ocuments\Working files\USI Ri Report\Deliverable\App E slug test results\Ingram_MW-1a_Slug _Test _Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equation 1 Hydraulic CoaduccWry
K Uuittt
K = kJnCL/r.1 In
Y-
I.tl9E 03 ftlmin
21L t
}',
1.57E+00 frldap
5.53E 84 ern/xcc
whctc:
vanables
K =
IlvdMulic c;Wjuctmr
il,tllll{I316 ftlmin
so -
P at time zero
0.54 feet
Smallest log CV1 1; =
y at pme "t"
0.4 feet
Ixngth of semen
5 feet
Need to ealcula 4 =
Ratbux ofwell rasing
{i ?5 feet
MA-C srrccn In 11, _
'rbsckncar; of aquifer
5 feet
In K/c. =
1-1A.1im 2"
2.2G147G3
t =
time at p,
3.9 Mon.
Equa don 2
InVt.- 11
C
Ink1r._
F
ln(I„Ir„]
[l„Ir,]
Z.2G147G3
when:
C = See Fig. 2 (Houwet & Rice) p.1G l5
rr = Radius of lmrehule n?5 feel
Not=
'94 is the effective radsal disunrc over which I• is dissipauxi and r,,. Is the radius of borehole
br, is cyual to r, (equwalent rwlus) when water level is within well screen
Source:
Houwcr, i-1., May-jwtc 1989, "The Snuwer and Rice Slug Test - An t:pdaic", GROUNDWATER, Vol. 27, No, 3,
3
WELL JD
NM-10 Tro #I - Slxig in
SrMNAME
Former Ingram Plywood Site
CITE%STATE
Thornitsville, NC
JOB NUMBER
140089
to
tar rr
• r
:4
o• sf ro so tac xae *nca sxa-a
rr�
Fig. 2. Dimensiontess parameters A, 8, and C as a functron
of L00w far catculattan of IntF�P,'rtyj.
CMocumertts and SettmgsWuhmkeWly DocumentslWorking filesWSI RI RepartWefiverabWApp E slug test resultslingram_hAW-I D-Slugtast Analysis-SoLA ef.10sx

yo = 0.63
yt = 0.5
Farmer Ingram Plywood Site - MW-10 (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 2.2
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
C:\Documents and Settings\rruhmke\My DocumentslWorking files\USI RI Report\Deliverable\App E slug test results\Ingram_MW-10_Slug_Test_Anal ysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equacon 1 HydraLtbc Conducendfy if Urea
K _ ;a I-&/r...3 j In y 7.48E-03 ft/=[sin WILL ID b1W-14 Tret #2 - Slug removal
2It t r, 2.14E+00 ft/42Y SFTENAME Forme[ Ingram Plywood Site
7.14E-04 cm/sec CITY'/STATE Thomasville, NC
JOB NUMBER 140009
what: Variables
k = Hydraulic conductivity i?. VI4848 fr/min
}'„ = y ar time acm 0A3 feet
y, = Yet time "r" 0.5 feet
Lt = Length of screen 5 free so
r, = Radius of well casing (125 feet L C � -
rx� �
L. _ 7h1cknessaF%4WFcr 5 fret L.o
In &/r- _ I--qualron 2-
- e rol-
` / A
[ — time at y', 2.2 min. FF -
Equ2dan 2
nhcrr' C = See Fs2 (Bo�cr& Rice) r_16 1.5 O 7 ro sq too -cc :occ r - saoo�
r„ _ R%,1usabotchnie f1.25 f«t Fig. 2. Dimensionless parameters A. B. and C as a funcnon
1,1. = au of I-eirw for catculation of In (Rq;rw).
Norm:
`k is the effective radial distance over which y is dimipamd and r in the ratlrus of borrhole
are is equal to r, (cgwvalent radius) wimm water lcvcI is within welt' screen
Suurcr
I3utswer, ii., Me)-) kine 1989, "The Bouwrr and Rirc Slug Tcst - An Update', GROUNDWATER, Vol. 27. No. 3.
C:IDncuments and SettingslrruhmkeWly DocumentslWorktng fleslUSI RI Roport WiverabWApp E slug test resu1tslingram MW-i0 Slug Tess Areafysis-Bouwer.xisx

yo = 0.61
yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-19 (Slug in)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 2.45
Time (T) [min]
BROWN AND C A L D W E L L
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy ❑ocuments\Working files\USI RI ReportlfleliverablelApp E slug test resuftslingram—MW-19_Slug Test_Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equadon I Hydraulic Conductivrry
K = 4 LL 1 In ].
Zit 1 p,
where:
K
= Hydraubc umductivity
V st dnx zero
Smallest IVk cyc yr
= Fat ume "t"
l ,
— length of screxn
Need [o ralcula r.
= Radius of well casing
Make azrvn la L.
= Tiuckru of aquifer
In k/r,,.
_ (;greuhaa 2'
t
= time at y,
Equation 2
In l�lr = I S 1
ln[i�.Ir.Y
Where:
C =
1 tlr,.
K Emits
1.16E-03 ftlmin
1.67E+0p ftlday
5.87>�04 cm/sec
Vanablcs
11.0011563 klmrn
O41 fret
0.4 feet
15 feet
025 feet
15 fees
3.2223�G8
2i5 min.
3.�2237fi8
Ste Fig. 2 (Boun^cr & Rke) p.l G 2 5
Radius of borchulr 02S feet
GU
Noses:
'R, * the effective radial disrancc over which v m dlxrupatcd and r.. is the radius of borehole
br' a equal to r, (nqun•a.Imt radius) when water level is within well screen
sourer!
Bouwcr, I I,. Ma} June 1989, "The &tuwrr aml Rice Slug Tent - An Update", GROUNDWATER, Vol. 27. No, 3,
WELT-M AM-19 Tcst #I - Slug in
SITE NAME Farmer Ingram Plywood Site
Cliff'/STATE ThornasvUle, NC
JOB NUMBER 14DO89
a
-
• r
wp L
i
r
� ioH
r
_
Fig, 2. Dimensionless parameters A. a. and C as a furtcrion
of Le/rw for calculation of In(Relrw).
C:Occuments and SettingsWuhmkaWy OocumenlsMorkIng frleMUSI RI ReponlDsliverabk-App E slug test resullSlIngram_MW-19_Slug _Test _Analysis-Bouwer.xlsx

Yo = 0.74
m
m
w
Yt = 0.6
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-19 (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 1.6
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CA0ocuments and Settings\rruhmke\My Documents\Working files\USI R1 Report\Deliverable\App E slug test results\Ingram_MW-19_Slug_Test_Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSES FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
EquiroonI
ffvdrxubcConducriviq
K units
K =
rz*ln
in y _
8.80)~-04 ft/min
2L,
t y,
1.x7E+u6 ft/day
4.47E U4 cm/sec
where-
VMkblc+
K
= IIydtaubceexrducbvin,
I1.0rt00V99 ft/min
yo
= y at time zcm
0.74 feet
y,
= v at urine "t'•
0.6 feet
Lt
= Ixngth srf screen
15 feet
rr
= Rat] Put, of well casing
0.25 feet
I-
= Thickness of aquifer
15 feet
In Rc/rw.
= h+fuohm 2'
3.2223,68
1
- rime ar }',
f.6 rmn.
Equadon 2
in R,/r. -
Ll
In 14/r. _
ln(Lk/s„}
[L,Ir,y
3.2x23768
whets:
C
-
See Fig. 2 (&iuwcr & Rice) p.t 6
2 5
r,.
=
Radius of bnreholc
U 25 feet
Nntcs:
'k is the cffecuvc radial distance over which y is dissipated and r, is the riJius of borehole
bra is equal m r, (equivalent rad im) when water level is within well screen
Source:
Bouwer, 14., Nfay ]uric 1989. "The bouwcr and iticc Slug Test - An Vpdare", GROUNDWATER, Vol. 27, No. 3.
WELL ID MW-19 Tess #z - slug removal
SrTE NAME Former Ingram Plywood Site
Cf ISTATE Thomasville, NC
JOB NUMBER 140089
liL jr -
b r` r
A r
h /
s
z
• S 6 W too Tao woo 7'JC1c;
Fig. 2. Dimensionless parameters A. S. and C as a function
of La rw for calculation of I (Rylryg).
C:lDncuments and SettmgsWuhmkelMy DocumentsMorking fllaMUSI RI ReportMeliverabWApp E slug test resullsllrlgram_MW-18_Stug_Test_Anatysis-8ouwer.xlsx

ATTACHMENT B
HYUROGEQLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Hydrogeologic information is summarized in the RI Work Plan and the RI Report, both of which are
included in Attachment A. Additionally, hydrographs of monitoring wells MW-6, MW-16, and MW-19
to show the seasonal high water table elevations and sIugtest data performed during the RI are
included, A cross section of the subsurface is shown in Figure 6, which is included in Attachment H.

80.0 875.00
E
1
e
75.0
v
a
873.00 t
70.0
i
a
n
65.0 N
871.00
i
60.0
t
r
-i'k Nitrate
a
concentration in
55.❑
t
mg/L
e
869.00
—*—Water Elevation
50.0
45.0
867.00
40.0
865.00
35.0 —
Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec•05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Der-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
Date

100-0 870.00
E
95.0 e
V
a
90.0 868.00 t
i
85.0
n
N 80.0 866.00
i
t
r 75.0
a
t *—Nitrate
70.0 864.00 e concentration
in mgf L
65.0 --, Water
Elevation
60.0 852.00
55.0
50.0 860.00
Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
Date

882.00
73.0
E
i
63.0
e
880.00
v
a
t
i
53.0
0
878.00 n
N
ii 43.0
t
r
876.00
—o—Nitrate
a
concentration
t
33.0
-
in mglL
e
Water
Elevation
874.00
23.0
872.00
13.0
\ j
870.00
3.0
Dec-98 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-05 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
Date

yo = 0.59
yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-G (Slug in)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 2.9
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkeWy DocumentsMorking files\USI RI ReportQeliverablelApp E slug test resu1tsl1ngram_MW-6_S1ug_Test_Analysis-
6ouwer.xisx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
EquadenI MydrruYcCondurrit7ry K units
K = 2 infR.lz] 1 In y 9.06E-04 n/nun WELL W MW-6 Tesr #i - st.g in
Sit r v, 13G> +00 Ft/dav SITI'NAME Former Ingram Plywood Site
457E-04 ctn/sec CITY/STATE Thomasville, NC
f06NUMBER 140089
u hen,: Vanahlcs
K - Ilydr9uliic ctmtiuctiviry 00"9997 {tlmin
y„ - v at 6= aru OL59 feet
Snvlkm log cyc yl - v at time "r" 0A feet
I, I"grh of setrcn 15 feet ra
Need to cocula FLI- Radius of well easing 8.25 feet 3 � #
Make setecn to Iy _ -Thickness of aquifer l5 fret ■ t � �/f • ` 1
If, Esti/r = Fgrrliwr 1" 3?2237C tI t ,o I-
•�
r - time at y,
■ ,I ±tea
Equation 2 / !
In R,/r- = 3.1 In k/rw= ■� I R - _
In(I�Ir,) (lzl*.l 3.2223768 � .
where: Or - - - - - -.-r^� ...�.�� v
C - See Fig. 2 (Bouwrr & Rice) p.16 I S w sa ioa too woe`.. y 19M
r„ = Radius of borehole D.7S feet Fig. 2. Dimensionless parameters A. S. and C as a function
Inlr. _ GU of Le1rv, far calculation of In (Relrw).
Norm
'R, is the effective radial disonce u,tr which y is dissipated and r, is the radius of 6mehole
"r, is c4ml to r, (Nuit alent radius) a hcn u-atcr level is within well wmvn
Snurm
Boawm. I I., wisp June 1989, "-the l5oawcr and Rice $lu Test - An Update", GROL'ltiDW.-1TF.R, L'nL 27, No. 3.
C7Lpacuments and SettingsWuhmkeft aocuments%WorkingflieslUSI RI Roporttl)eliveraWeVApp E s" test resultslingram_MW-5_51ug_ies[_Ana"is-Souwer.xlsx

Y. = 0.87
m
d
Yt = 0.8
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-G (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 0.88
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy DocumentslWorking frles\USI RI ReportlDeliverablelApp E slug test resultslingram_MW-S_Siug_Test _Analysis-
Bouwer. xlsx

SLUG TEST ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Eguarion 1 HydrauEc Conducriviry
K - r_� in([Z!r_] 1 111 X-
21,,. t
where:
Equadan 2
where,
K
- Ilydraufic cvnductivin
Y.
- y at time nru
yt
= y at time "t"
[�
= f.cngth of xrccn
- Radius of wc31 casing
1„
— Thickness of aquifer
In R,/re,
2"
t
— time at y,
1n R Ir. - 3,} + C
lno-.jr.) (Wr.)
K Units
G.40I 04 fri mi n
9.21E-01 ft/dav
3.25E-04 cm1KC
Variablt,s
I+mII6399 ftlmin
0.87 fact
q,s feet
15 feet
0.25 fact
15 feat
3.22237GS
ii.86 min.
3/223763
C: See Fig, 2 Wuu-rr & Rice] p.l G 25
r = Radius of horehuL- 0 5 feet
lt�ro - GU
Notrx
'k is the effective radial distance over which y is dissipated and L is the radius of brmcbolc
°r, is equal to r, fequiealenr radius) when water Icvcl is within will semen
'Hume-
13ouwcr, I J , May.fune 1989, -lbe Boaver and Rice Slug Tear - An Ltpdatc,% GRi]L'1\l7VGATER, L'ul. 27, No.3.
WFLL ID MW-G Tesr #2 - Slug mmoval
SITE NAME Farmer Ingram Plywood Site
=ISTATE Thamasvitic, NC
JOBNVMBER 140009
1
• 3
+0 $10 49.0 no -000 9opo
t,,..
Fig. 2. DimensianIOU parameters A. B. and C as a function
of Leirw for calculation of In (fi gi►w).
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy DocumentslWorking filesWSI RI ReparlDeliyeraWMApp E slug test resuilslingram—MW-6 SIug_Test_Analysis•Bouwer.xlsx

Ya = 0.54
w
a�
J
Yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-10 (Slug in)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
AXIIEWL
t= 3.9
Time (T) (min)
AND C A L D W E L L
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy DocumentslWorking fiieslUSl Ri ReportOeliverablelApp E slug test resultslingram_MW-10_Slug_Test_Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TEST AN)UNSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equation 7 Hrdr�ulic Conducgrlry
21, t !,
wherr-
Egcvrion 3
where:
1..
Smallest leg nx Y.
1,
Need u, pleula r,
Make scrern In L�
In R,/r.
t
Iiydraulic conductivity
y at circle Z=
v at time "I"
i.ength of sueen
= Radius of well casing
- Thickncsc of aquifer
i:q„nda.! 2'
lime at v,
-C
K Units
1.09E 03 ItImin
iS7E+00 fl/day
S.S3E 04 ctn/sec
varia6hos
llA010876 h/min
0.54 feet
OA feer
S i'cet
0.25 feet
5 feet
3.4 min.
In R,/r. =
22614763
C — Scc Fig- 2 (Mower & Rice) p.16 1.5
Radius of biwehule 025 feet
',Jr. = 20
Notrw
'R, is Ihr effective tadW distance !wcr which y in dissipated and r is the radius of borehole
is equal to r {equivalent radius} when wirer keel is within well screen
Sourer:
9ouwcr, 11., May -June 1989, "the Njuwo and Rice Slug Test An Updare", GROUNOWATkiR, Vol. 27, No, 3.
3
WELL 1D MW-10 Test rrl - Stt-gin
SITE NAIVE Former Ingram Plywood Sfte
CMZSTATE Thornasviilc, NC
JOHNUMFER 14M9
!r
L[yr cr ;
� r
Iwo
c
6 O �,
r I a r
� 9
! + q xi !qp _tro iaoa axa
Fit. 2. Dimensionless pararnettt►s A. B, and C as a function
of Le/ryy for calculation of In�Relrwl.
C:VXwments and SetlingslrruhmkelMy DocumentsMorking filesWSI RI RDpod0eirverahlelApp E slug lest resultsllrrgram_MW-i0_Slug Test—Analysis-Bouwer,xisx

Y. = 0.63
m
m
Yt = 0.5
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-]A (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t= 2.2
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and SettingslrruhmkelMy DocumentslWorking files\USI RI ReportlDeiiverahlelApp E slug test resultslingram_MW-10_Slug_Test_Analysis-
Bouwer. xlsx

SLUG TESI'ANALYSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equanon 1
Htirtnrubc Conducriviry
A Units
h=
r,Is1fR lr ] 1 In
K-
1.48E-03 ftjmin
a, t
V,
2.14E+0p ftlday
7.54E tT4 C;nlsec
u hrrr:
Variables
It -
Hvdtaulic conductivity
0,1904848 (t/min
Y. -
}' at Line zero
0.63 feet
r, =
y at time "t"
03 feet
1y =
IAr Wh of screen
5 feet
rr =
Radius of well rnsmg
0.25 fm
fry -
•llvckness of aquifer
5 fcr:t
In R,/r. -
f:qurrw. 2'
r —
time at y,
2 2 Hurt.
Equation 2
In ► /r. =
Ll
In Rrlr. _
ln{iL.Jr"l
�J4j
2.26i47d3
when:
C
-
Scc fig. 3 (Bouwcr do Rkc) p.16
1 5
Radiws of borehole
0 25 fret
lti arcs:
it is the effective radial distance over which p is dissipated and r,. is the radius of borehole
er, is equal n. r, (rquwalent radius) when %vatar level is within well set n
Source:
R•,uwrr, 11., NiaV Junc 1989, "'lhe Bnu -er and Rice Slugfest An Update", GRC3iT:T]R'A"MR, Val.27, No, 3,
W-rLC 1D WW 10 Test a2 - StuR wntnvpl
SITE NAME Farmer Ingram Plywood Site
CIT} M7-E- Thomaevitle, NC
JOBNUMBER 140M
awn
t•
Ir
• f f•rf 2
a _n
s w w ,oa :ac t000 soaa
Fig. 2. Dimonsionlau parameters A. $, and C as a function
of Lgirw for calculation of In (Relrw).
CiOocuments and SetlingslrruhrnkelMy Oocuments%Working fileMUSI RI ReportWelivetablekApp E slug test rasullslingram_MW-10_Slug_Test_Ana lys,s-Rouwer.xlsx

y4 = 0.61 _
m
m
0A
yt = 0.4
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-19 (Slug in)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
I.
•'r
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.-
t-- 2.45
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
CADocuments and Set#ingslrruhmkelMy Documents\Working fileslUSI RI Report\DeliverablelApp E slug test results\Ingram_MW-19_Slug_Test_Anaiysis-
Bouwer. xlsx

SLUG TESL` ANAI XSIS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Erfuvrivn7 HydraulicCarrduc[fsit}'
h ;_ InfR_Ir l i In 3
21Y t Y'
u he rc
i4
- 140iaubc Conducd%*y
Y.
- Y at time ECr(1
Smallrnt hg CYL Y,
- Y at dnx Y
It
- t.cngth of srrmn
Nccd to culcula ir
— FLtdiLz of well casing
Wke xrcen In L
= Thicknex5 ufaquifcr
in k/ .
- Lgivaim 3.
t
- time at Y,
Equsriap -2
In k/r,
where:
C
See Fig. 2 (6nuuer �c Rice) p.1 G
Radius of borehole
x Units
1.16E 03 ft/min WELL ID MW-19 TC-NT 1- s"ui; in
1.67E+pt) ft/day 5fMNAAW Former Ingram Plywood Site
5.87E 04 unbcc CI7Yf5TATE ThorrtmvWe, NC
JOB NUMBER 140M
Variables
r1.[It}t1563 ft/min
0.81 feet
0.4 feet
15 fmr to
0.75 feet ; C , - i
i5 Ycet ■ �f j
r
2as5 min. F I a r 1
L I
1 �
3.222.3768
11 ro so nip 740 1*00 asdo
Fig. Z. Dimensioniess parameters A, B. and C as a function
{t" of Lelr" for calculation of In (Re/rw).
motes:
'k is the lFfeeuve ot" drstsnce over which v is dissipated and r, is the radius of borehole
°r, is equal in r, {equwalwt radius} when wutrr Ievci is within well screen
Snurcr:
Buuwec, F L. NSay junc 1959, " 11ty &,uacr and Rim Slug Teat An Update", GROINUW'ATE.R, Vol. 27, tio. 3.
C lDocuments and Sett"ngsaTuhrnke\My DocumentsMorkirsg WesIUS] RI Reporffleliverable%pp E slug test resultslingram_"-19 Slvgjest_Ana"y s-Sauwer.xlsx

yv = 0.74
JIM
yt = 0.6
Former Ingram Plywood Site - MW-19 (Slug removal)
BOUWER & RICE SLUG TEST METHOD
t=1.6
Time (T) (min)
BROWN AND CALDWELL
C:0ocuments and SettingsWuhrnkeWy Documents\Working files\USI RI Report\BeliverablelApp E slug test results\Ingram_MW-19_Slug_Test_Analysis-
Bouwer.xlsx

SLUG TESTANALY5IS FOR UNCONFINED AQUIFERS
Equar—I
Hy&wulfrC—d—ry
S Units
K
' Infit_/r_1
f In } F
8.80E-04 h/min
21,
$ y,
1.Z7E+00 ftldA%
4.47E-04 cmism
When;
V2nabk5
K
- Hydraulic mnduetivire
1),IlUt18799 ftlmin
y at hmc 7.errt
0.74 feet
Y.
- Y as time'1"
0.6 feet
1,
= Lrnynh of wmmn
15 feet
rz
- Radius of well "sing
0.Z9 fcer
Lti
- Thickness of aquifer
t 5 feet
In R,Ir.
- Leo#,w 2'
i,2?237G8
t
- timt at
lSqusrion 2
In k/r.
Jul
r
In R,Ir.
]n f l , Ir,)
(I 41 r,]
3.2223768
where
C
-
Ser rig. Z (&)uwcr & Rice) p.16
Z.5
y
-
Radt" 4 borehole
!i.?5 ti rr
Notes:
'k is the effective radial diatanee over which y is disaipsiW and r, is the radios of harehole
h4 is cquot tt, r, (equrvalenr radius) when water level is within well semen
Snuroc
Bouwer, I1,May] u" 1989. -)he lir,uw•sr and Rice Slug Test An Update", GRt 7i'1tiL71C":1'l F11, Vol. 27. No. I
WELL ID AM-19 Test tt2 - Saul{ mrnovoi
SITE NAME Former Ingram Plywood Site
CTTY MTE Thomaavilic, NC
JOB NUMBER 140089
m
■
ttae �
C F
to /
as sat ,00a sxa- c
Fig. 2. 1)imemtonless parameters A, B, and C at a function
of L@�rw for calcu]ation of tnIRg1rW),
C:TocumeMs and S illings;VruhrnkelMy DocumentsMorking ftles%USI RI Report0eliverableLApp E slug test resultslingram_11AW-19 Slug_ W-Analysis-Rouwer.xlsx

ATTACHMENT D
INJECTION RATIONALE
Information from the Work Plan to complete the Phase II Remedial Investigation is recited below:
The injectant was selected because of its potential to remediate the contaminants of concern. As
described in the Work Plan to complete the Phase II Remedial Investigation, a groundwater
remediation pilot test was proposed near wells MW-6, MW-10 and MW-19 to assess whether the
addition of a carbon source will stimulate the biological degradation of nitrate. However, based on
recent groundwater data, the pilot test will now focus only on well MWA.0. The objectives of the pilot
test are to:
• Determine if the selected technology can reduce the nitrate impacts to below the NCDENR 2L
Standard of 10 mglL;
• Determine whether daughter products are formed that are not further treated by the in situ
treatment, and
• Generate information, such as injectant volume and concentration, useful far developing the
design for full-scale treatment.

ATTACHMENT E
INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Information from the Work Plan to complete the Phase II Remedial Investigation is recited below:
'J - ")4 1 r 4, ,,,
The solution will be injected into the aquifer through th" temporary injection points constructed of
PVC piping. The injectant will be delivered to the Site ih appropriate storage containers and diluted
on -site to be 1 percent solution in water. The solution will be injected utilizing a trailer -mounted
system consisting of the following main components: 1) drum transfer pumps and flow meter
systems for transferring reagents into a mix tank, 2] a 300-gallon capacity mix tank and mixer to
prepare batches of solution prior to injecting, 3) a centrifugal pump system including a variable
frequency device to control the pumping rate to between 1 and 10 gallons per minute (gpm) with an
injection pressure ranging up to 20 psi, and 4) manifolds to safety and efficiently transfer the
solution into the IP.
Gasoline- ar diesel -powered electrical generators and compressors will be used on -Site to operate
chemical mixers and injection pumps. Water for mixing the solution will be obtained from a
municipal water supply system.
The pilot test will consist of the injection of several hundred or more gallons of solution. The solution
will be injected at flow rates ranging from 1 to 10 gallons per minute (gpm) at pressures ranging
from just a few pounds per square inch (psi) up to pressures of 20 psi. Injection of solutions will be
followed by injection of clean water to flush one or more system components including the mixing
tank, the pump and the injection piping and hoses.

ATTACHMENT F
MONITORING PLAN
Information from the Work Plan to complete the Phase II Remedial Investigation is recited below:
Monitoring associated with the pilot testing includes monitoring during the solution injection and the
post -treatment monitoring. Post -treatment sampling events will be scheduled at least one (1), three
(3), six (6), and 12 weeks following the completion of the injection.
During solution injection, the following parameters will be periodically monitored at well MW-10 and
the three injection monitoring points to provide real time information about performance and ensure
the safety of field personnel:
1. Water quality parameters including pH, temperature. dissolved oxygen, and ORP (via a water
quality analyzer - e-g., Horiba U-22),
2. Groundwater elevation (via an interface probe), and
3. Visual observations for solution in wells (using clear bailer).
Additionally, the following process data will be recorded:
4. Injection pump flow rate,
5. Injection pump discharge pressure,
6. IP manifold pump side pressure,
7. IP manifold IP side pressure,
8. Total mix tank batch injection time.
9. Total volume of solution injected; and
10. Water temperature at injection point.
At weeks 1. 3, 6, and 12. post -treatment groundwater samples will be collected from MW-10, PMW-
7, and the three injection monitoring points. These groundwater samples will be sent to a laboratory
for analysis of nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, TKN, and TOC. The reduced forms of manganese (Mn+2)
and iron (Fe+2) will be monitored in the field. Water quality parameters of pH, temperature. DO. and
ORP will be measured in the field.

ATTACHMENT F
MONITORING PLAN
Information frorhthe Work Plan to complete the Phase 11 Remedial investigation is recited below:
Monitoring associated wit the pilot testing includes monitoring during the Olution injection and the
post -treatment monitoring. st-treatment sampling events will be sched ed at least one (1), three
(3), six (6), and 12 weeks fol loO4ng the completion of the injection.
During solution injections, the folio g parameters will be periodic ly monitored at well MW-10 to
provide real time information about pe armance and ensure the afety of field personnel:
1. Water quality parameters including p , emperature, disso ed oxygen, and ORP (via a water
quality analyzer - e.g., Horiba U-22),
2. Groundwater elevation (via an interface pro ), and
3. Visual observations for solution in wells (using earbailer).
Additionally, the following process data will be record
4. Injection pump flow rate,
5. Injection pump discharge pressure,
6. IP manifold pump side pressure,
7. IP manifold IP side pressure,
8. Total mix tank batch injection time,
9. Total volume of solution injected; apfc
10. Water temperature at injection pint.
At weeks 1, 3, 6, and 12, post-tre ment groundwater samples will be cot lecte rom MW-10. These
groundwater samples will beFperature,
to a laboratory for analysis of nitrate, nitrite, a onia, TKN, and
TOC. The reduced forms of anese (Mn+2) and iron (Fe+2} will be monitored i he field. Water
quality parameters of pH, to DO, and ORP will be measured in the field.

ATTACHMENT G
WELL DATA
Information available from previous investigations regarding well data is included in Attachment G.

Remedial Actium Report
Ingram PytiixW Fmilirv. 71ummisville. NC
TABLE 4
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
1411 Rodir [' wiparr►rhsi
1'ririltl,�•<I inn! � 'u��flele'+Nr�11
Ground
Top Of
Total Depth
Well screen
Eleviltiuu of
Firv:lliml of
Flevaliou of
Well
Date
Casing
of Well
(of
l.rugll�lUi:tinlrtcrl
!ixa<d t ark
lieuloidle Seal
Installed
(feet)
(feet)
uli
Llerndva
(feel)
SixJl'ypr
(feel)
(feely
(frcl)
�
M W- i
1969
890.86
090.59
21.0
IVIW-5
4/18/90
895.10
894.83
21.0
?
?
?
?
MW-6
4/18190
876.30
877.31
21-0
7
?
?
?
MW-8
4/19190
890.72
890.40
15.1
7
7
?
7
MW-10
4119190
879.09
881.21
27.1
?
?
?
It
MW-1 1
?
891.33
893.09
10.0
?
7
7
7
MW-13
?
891.86
893.35
14.2
7
?
?
hiw- I S
1217198
885.44
885.22
27.0
1512"1.0101PVC
858.44 -
858.44 -
875.44 -
873.44
875.44
B77.44
MW-19
12/7198
883.55
885.75
22.0
1512"1.0101PVC
861.55 -
861.55 -
878.55 -
876.55
878.55
880.55
MW-20
1.217198
882.66
884.85
22.0
1512"1.0101PVC
880.66 -
875.66 -
877.66 -
875.66
877.66
879.66
RW'-2
1993
876.34
874.34
? 'ate
7
?
?
?
RW-3
1993
875.02
873.02
? ys
7
?
?
?
Disines car Amore 39 r1+1ku+r I Z 19Vy
h k1ft ,..F.;d7ato- IM0111 Ihc....•xIw'lJrY!A%

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORDS

S s E=L CC%'tF;
r!
2'r PYC
CEur'ti a G=C.iT
.010" SLOTTED S-REEN
I-2 FT
AsovE a'C7=--m
J
4
b
�C
SAM Flu; -ER
s : `
PACK
MCNi i O"ING WELL
Ficu"a

FOR r.FF:CE USE'ONLY
'NOMH CAnCL;'JA CE7ARTMENT CF 11A':�;F SCUFiCcS AID CC1,SMUNITY CEVELCi'U=+.
QtVI&ON CF ENVIRONMENTAL I. IAGEMWT - GitC MWATER SEC7ICH
P.O. BOX 27Et17-RALF[OR 14-C. 27611. PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Cuad. No. Serial No.
Lat. Long. pc
Minor Basin
Basin Code
Header Ent. Gw-1 Ent._
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Engineering Tectonics, P.A.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER $35 PERMIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Thomasville County: Davidson
(Road, Community, at Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. ❑WNER', Ingram Plywood
ADDRESS Highway 29-70
Street or Route No.
Thomasville NC 27361
City or Town State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED USE OF WELL Monitoring
4. TOTAL DEPTH _ 20' _ CUTTINGS COLLECTED © Yes ❑ No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? ❑ Yes 0 No .
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 6.8 FT. above TOP OF CASING.CCII below
TOP OF CASING IS 0 FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA
a. WATER ZONES (depth): 6.8
r
9.Type NA Amount
10, CASING:
From
From
From
11. GROUT:
NA
Wail Thickness
Depth Diameter or weight/Fl. Material
0 Ta 10 Fl. 2 Sch. 40 POC
To —Ft.
To Ft.
Depth Material
From CL _ To_ F �Ft. Portland
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
Method
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From 10 To 70 Ft-­2—In­ _ ill0 in. Pyr
Frans T❑ Ft. • in, In.
From To Ft. in. In.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Dev:h Size Material
From 12 To 20 Fl,,ide 11 graded Sand
From Ta Ft.
1.' IJARKS: I9-11l
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Descr►plion
. ee Boring Lox _
II additional space Is neaded use hack of form.
LOCATION[ ^,KETCH_
(Shaw direction and distance from at least two State Roads
or •other map reference points)
I CO HEPEBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCCADANC-T WITH IS NCAC 2C. WELL CCAISTRUCT
STANDARDS, AND THAT A CCPY CF THIS FECCRD HAS EE51-1 PROAC.ED TO TFE WELL OUritil:r3.
SiGNA%LAE CF c:C li.ACTCR CFI AGENT r':1.V-1a-rieAri 1 ilRa CA-_
Su'J'r,", G.'! lr: r�vrSi^n al Egylroir:1en:at M3n,';1-er•1 arc ccay 10 -4-1 o',vr`$f
C,, 3t :-

1`4OF17H CAF.CLI14A OE?ARTIAENT OF 14ATURAL F RCES AND CO>+ MVNtTY CEVELOPMEN7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL WPAGEMEW - GROUNDWATER SECTION
~ • P.O. 6Ox 97e87 - RAUIGH.IIC. 27811, PHON6 [phone]
r WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
i .
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Engineering Tectonics, P.A.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.
Lat. Long.
Minor Basin
Basin Code
Header Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town, Thomasville County: Davidun
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER -.. Ingram Plywood --
ADDRESS Hi hue 2 -70
(Street or Route NO3
Thomasville, NC.. Z7361.
City or Town State ZIP Code
3. DATE DRILLED USE OF WELL ,Monitoring
4. TOTAL DEPTH _ ry5 CUTTINGS COLLECTED Q Yes ❑ No
5. DOES WELL. REPLACE EXISTING WELL? Q Yes ®No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL- 8.6 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING,
❑ below
TOP OF CASING IS 2'O FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
S. WATER ZONES (depth): 6.6
7. _mLORINATION. Type NA Amount NA
D. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Depth
Diameter or Weignt/Ft. Material
From 0
Ta
15 Fl.,
-2"_ __ Sal,_ bQ PTc__ _
From
To
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
1. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
From a
To
13 Ft,
Portland
From
To
Ft.
2. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Site ' Material
From 1 c
Tom_
Ft.
� fn, � 1 In. - -Pyc
From
To
FL.
In. In,
From
To
FL
In, In.
3. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size biaterlal
From Z3 To 25FI. fell graded Sand
Frcr1 To Ft.
MARKS: % ,
Serial No.
Pc
GW-1 Ent.
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
C
If additional space is needed use back of form.
Lpr,ATIQN SKETCH
.ry
(Show direction and distance from at least Iwo State Roads,
or other neap reference points)
f CO HEPESY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL Col'ISTRUCTICt
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY CF THIS RECCRO HAS BEEN PAOVICED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE OF CCNTRACTCR 08 AGENT DATE

QIViSlett CF DWIRCNMENTAL M N1._.,...Vr - rjRC(Ji01YATcR SE"":CN
P.O, BOX 2ie8T - RAL :0KN.C. 27011. PHONE [phone]l
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
i
FCC, c- �� USE C:1LY
C ad. Nc. Serial No.
La:. Long. Pc
Minor Easin
Basin Code
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent._
TRILLING CONTRACTOR Engineering Tectonics, P.A.
. STATE V'l1rLL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER PERMIT NWASER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Thomasville C�unty: Davidson
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER :. Insram Plvtrood
ADDRESS Hiphwav 29-70
(Street or Route No.
_ Thomasville, NC _ 27361
City or Town State tip Code
3. DATE DRILLED USE OF WELL ttonitorinQ
d. TOTAL DEPTH 18 ; 5 CUTTINGS COLLECTED Q Yes ❑ No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? ❑ Yas © No
S. STATIC WATER LEVEL: t1—..r.^� FT. ❑ above TOP OF CASING.
❑ below
TOP OF CASING IS 2.0 . _ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (Gpmk _ NA _ LIE T HOD OF TEST N 4
8. WATER ZONES (depth):_-
9...,iLORINATION:
10. CASING.
Type Amount
Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Welgnt/Ft. i.laterlal
From - - To "Ft. a„ - Sch -40 - Pj-rC'C
From To Ft.
From To FI.
11. GROUT.
Depth 1•,talerial tilethod
From 0 To- 5.0 Ft. Rortland
From To Ft.
12. SCP.EEAI:
Depth Diameter Slot Size klaterfal
From B • 5 To 18.5 Ft. 2 in, .010 in. PVC
Frzrn To Ft. in. in,
From To Ft. in. in,
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depm Saxe hialerial
Frcra &_ c To_- 7 A c Ff. tgel l graded Sand
From To Ft.
I., %IAF;KS. 1.11;3
Depth OPILLING LOG
Fran To Formation Oescription
Roo -i e,
It addlttcral space is needed use back of ferrn.
LOCATIO14 SKETCH -
(Show direcJcn and c+isrance from at least two State Roads,
or other map rele(ence points)
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY 7RA7 THIS WELL WAS CCHSTRUCTED IN ACCCROANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. 11.1SL-L CCNSTF.UCT.C%
STANDARDS, AND 7HAT A COPY CF THIS RECCSO HAS EEO-N FF,OVICEC 7-0 THE VIELL CWNER.
G.�-1 SevIsad I I/Z-1 Sutrtt CriS:^_,i 0iviS:.,n c'=:nvrcrmar:a, Manw;errer.t aria ea:+ w well owner

NcRTH CARCUNIA CEPARTId_:rr CF HATUS 3CURC=S AN;D C 3!1W''jNJ1: Cz-v 2.CP!.1E
iF
Uac
FAR C-ri�.c QNL ;'
DIVISION CF F-NVIRCNMrNTAL kMAGE.L{ENT - GRCUNOWAMI SECT:CN
- P.O. BOX 278S7-RAL,IGH.H.C. 27011. PHONE [phone]
Quad. No. Serial No.
Lat. Long, Pc ,
I.f€nor Basin
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Basin Coda
Header Ent. GW-t Ent.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Engineering Tectonics, P.A.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER v1�¢
PErR'dIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketCh of the location below)
Nearest Town: Thomasville
Cct:nty: _ Davidson
Depth ❑AILtWG LOG
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
From To Forrlatlon Description
2. OWNER. Zn>;ram Plywood -_
.- ¢ee 30 Leg _
ADDRESS Highway 29-7
(Street or Aoute No.)
_ Thomasville. - NC 27361 _^
City or Town State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED USE OF WELL Moni toring
4. TOTAL DEPTH _�Z' CUTTINGS COLLECTED I;j Yes ❑ No
E. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes 13- No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 8.2 FT, m above TOP OF CAS3VG,
© below
TOP OF CASING IS? p___ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (9pm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA
f1ATER ZONES (depth):
9.—.iLORINATION: Type
10. CASING:
NA Amount NA
Wall Thickness
Depth
Diameter or We€qnt/Ft. Material
From
O To
10 Ft.
' 2" Sc h . O PVC
From
To
F I.
From
To
Ft.
11. GROUT:
Depth
i.fatarlal !.Method
From IITo A Ft.
Portland
From
To
Ft.
12. SCREEN:
Depth Diameter Slot Size Maiedal
From, .,,10_. To?0.Ft. `' In._ ntQ In. _pvr
From Te Ff. in. In.
From Ta Ft. In. h
13. GRAVEL PACK;
If additional space Is needed use back of (Urn,
LOCATION ri H
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads.
cr other mao reference points)
Dec;h Size Material
From S To 20 Ft. Well Qraded San
Frorn To Ft.
MARKS: II U4
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CC?IS TAVC TEE IN ACCCr=CANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. !ELL CCINSTAUC T ICtd
S - AN *OAFC3. At:C T HAT A COPY CF T > :tS RE CCRO HAS SSEEN! PRCViCc.0 70 Tr,B WELL OWNER.

Appendix B
Well Abandonment Reords

uaperLmi -- or natural ![eeourCa■ and commun vevelopment
,
liviaion of Environmental Hanm4,
40, , EC GCE
WELL ". P. 0. Box 27687 - Raleigh, N. C. 2761i N.C. Dept. of EHNR
Rwam 'MAY 1 t 200
rinm AMR 1gmee1eA F,uyirznr�rt-rPx►T�1L 1��►��f►vC' RM.
2.
3-
4.
5.
6.
7.
WII.L LOCATION: (Show a aketch of the locetion on back of form.) R e Gio n at .;
Nearest Toxn: County ��1�� VAS
Quadrangle No.
Road, Co==Uty, Subdivision, Lot No.
OWNER: f�Ls ,�vper
ADaWS: NV-? y.4try, ,S'Gyct� I�,Tu 1LCs7depthqaand
: Draw a detailed sketch of the
TOPOGRAM.-draw, slope, hilltop,valley,T�g total depth, depth and diamete
remaining in the ire13, gravel
USE OF WELL.- WW7rJt DATE: �-0q-2tervals of caaing perforations,
7,0,E �'IN: Dr a&. : {' nd types of fill materials use a
R�vm� PE'x� 9� �rLe,
feet diameter
A�
SFALM MATERIAL i
Naat cement
Sand cement
ba.ge of cement
'bags of cement
gala. of water S3
yds. of sand
gale. of water
Other
Type material. 2!��•uitln-►%T�
Amount
E1'F AXN ME'=D OF EMFLACEMM OF IMATERLkL
I do hereby- certify that this well
abandarzment record is true and exact.
.3 -z 7-z
SignAturs of Contractor or Agent Date
Pepr�)
-27z e^ili-f. e. G,? o u 7-(fD J=1-:? ax�
;5� ,e e�7c�, 7-r,V,-,fj 4��.
/Ve lCeconp oc
IN f1 d2z, e ,
Sc e X7-r44,v P a A-�A P
S ub*1t original to the Division of Environmental Wan4gemant, one copy to the Driller,
d an■ copy to the owner.
ar-30 irriard XQ / t 180

500 100 0 Soo 1000 FEET
SOURCE: Base map Is hm a porUan of a Davldaon County Tax Map
LEGEND:
0 Residendal Walls
3
. A
Figure 2
WATER WELL SURVEY
DAVIDSON COUNTY TAX MAP
Former Ingram Plywood Facility
7 1 a Baaaed Drive
Thomasville, Georgia
® DAMES & MOORE
1� �.r..arsx•�„

Departm of Natural Resources and Commun Devel6pment
'. ivision of Environmental Manag 014 ° RECFI� t-
NEB. P. O. Box .2 7W7 - Raleigho N. C. 27611 s, . • �� ��
DEAL , MAY 1 1
a.
3.
k.
5•
6.
7.
9
9.
rRAM
WLOCAMON: (Show a sketch of the location on back of form.) i !, ._ �`'WELL
Nearest Townt- H ❑ice y S ► � L— G Co=ty , �J V a s_o �•.1
Quadrangle No.
Road, Co mnu ity, Subdivision, Lot No.
ass SJZowe ,2eC IaeoJCe
e MESS; 71 Z SJj5d rr D2 . IIjo 5'1JUe7wellshowing
AM: Draw a detailed sketch of the
TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slope, hilltop, valley, Qat total depth, depth and diamete
remaining in the well, gravel
USE OF wF�L,I,: W rem MTV: 3 -�`� -� interval, intervala of casing perforations,
TOTa7. DEPTH: 217 D
rQ ETM: / " and depths and types of fill materials used
feet
A-11q
SE IIJW MATERIAL t
Neat cement
bags of cement
gale. of water�_
diameter
AJA
Sand cement
bags of cement
yds. of sand �!
gala, of water
Other -z /zc)_ C0Ae,0e7-e1 i
Type material') RA` �7
.Amount '
E PLUX ME=D OF EMPLACEMM OF MtTERFet.
I do hereby Certify that this well
abarAor=nt record is true and exact.
T 7-
Signature of Contractor or Agent Date
/40 b-a)zezD Wel, L
Q b
Q 4
A v
rn
f� �C
o
CD
n
a
at
ft
�11Q,e D 2
of 1064 -'�)Y
,4N D cI 9,4C S
See
r
ariainal to the Division of Environmental Nana: went, one Copy to the Driller,
on■ cap]' to the Owner.
GW-30 Rerised 1011laO lzm

.•s}+.r�rnr� a .■acuroi resources ana couimunl ieveiopment
vision of Environmental Man&
WELL ABANDONKM P. D. Box 27687 - PAIsighi N. C. 27611
ABCCRD ,
C NTRAG"I'0 f�lYl e, + L�N �aW, 2o�j1�N i tl .� �%k� REr3 N Z 5 0
I. WELL I==0N: (Show a sketch of the location on back of form.)
Heareat Town t `rN 0 i�14 S v L L County,
�Ssdrangle No.
Road, Co==nity, 5Ubdivleion, Lot No.
2. Ud=t SJZ GW�-J of S ►De:yGe
3. AzmEss:2 z S err DAz . a 5yWGe DTAC�RlIM: Draw a detailed sketch of the
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slope,hilltop,valley,QLt �'$Zl showing total depth, depth and dinmet,
of screens remainll$ in the well, gravel
5. USE OF i�II,i.: W�gTel�- DATE: �-Z`-�- interval, intervals of casing perforations,
6. Z�7LQ DEFT .- 22 DLUWM:� and depths and types of Till materials ueez
feet
"A
B. SE&LIM ?lA,MUAL=
Neat cement
bags of cement 12-
gals. of water
dicer
Al A
Sand cement
' bags of bement`�
yda, of sand �^
gals■ of water
Other i
Typo m tsriaz , �°7� ,EeA-� i3O.4.1/TC
re�r.._r?
9. EXPUW MEMOD CF IMACEKW OF WERIILL,
T1?eA4sc r-� If .�=e :tO
I do hereby certify that this well
abwadonment record is true and exact.
Signature of Contractor or Agent Data
a '
c
c)
c
� Mv
�.. W, Y
•• n
w -+
r p
70 Fee7-
7G74c
No IZe 6 09) 49r (5: Lt,--r
Submit oriainal to the Division of Environmental MAn4&0M4nt, one copy to the Driller,
and arts copy to the Amer,
ar-30 lwised 1011►80

fie
4
t `' • N ��i8 �C�65
icy w•t •r��
Ai-` B 61 AC.
MAP
A. 74A
"-= pi EASi4T"s_RD .r `i.� 1 .� -� AC • .
i"T i r31r �2i: J
kc
r OUSIt4ESS
J ET'r pR�E .. , e
5.••�•• ••� INGRAM
PLYWOOD
FACIUN
�Y,u
•4 AC
3
n � '•r. n
500 100 0 500 1000 FEET
SOURCE: Base map is from a portion of a Davidson County Tax Map
LEGEND:
3 3 Residential Waft
aft
Figure 2
WATER WELL SURVEY
DAVIDSON COUNTY TAX MAP
Former Ingram Plywood Facility
718 Bassett Drive
Thomasville, Georgla
DAMES & MOORE

nortn Carolina _
Depar_, of Natural Resources and CoL t_., Development
division of Environmental Management
YELL ABANDONMENTr 0. Box 27687 - Weigh, N. c. 27611
RECORD
� TRA R �'1�,�'� 1N N✓, IZc��7 IrNifiL .���!-L� r RM. No. S o 2-
I. WELL LOCATION: (Show a sketch of the location on back of form.)
Neareat Town: .r1-1 ❑ t+•1 /q S d • L G County _01y ! Q S _U IQ .
Quadrangle No.
Road, Community, Subdivision, Lot No.
2. OWW: SQ owl 2eS iae.0Ge
3. ADLRFSS : 7' 2 6455e, rr DR., -r42Ljd 5 Yeiae
4. TOPOGRAM:draw, slope, hilltop, valley,tl-„&t
5. USE OF W=Z: L'-)fl Tel DATE: 3 - Z q - Z
6. TOM nvm 29 DLeME•TE -. /Sol
7. CASH RE MOVEDs
feet
"A
.�...-.ram.
8. SgJ1M* MATERIAL:
Neat cement
bass of cement_
gals. of water��
diameter
.'VA
Sand cement
bags of cement
yda. of sand.
gels. of water-„
Otheri�l�D �43CI��TPIs
Type material,J�1,. $ �E)jjW .4�6. �ez
Amount z
9. EXPLAIN XMWD OF EMPIACEMENT OF MATERLAL
I do hereby certify that this well
abandormant record is true and exact.
3-2 7.z
Signature of Contractor or Agent bate
WELL DIAORAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the
well showing total depth, depth and diamete
of screens remaining in the well, gravel
interval, intervals of casing perforations,
and depths and types of fill materials used
/ 0 "' 80)zen
1X
' AN
C.ve'eL
DeP7-1�
ILL�I] 2,-)l 7>) Z Y,#lz )_�)S
PY
S'ee 1q7-r c. e t> /Wp
:uhv.t ortzinal to the Division of 8nvironmantal Management, one copy to the Driller,
%nd one copy to the Owner#
V-30 tensed 1012180

DaPaI nt of Natural Resources an CA`' ty Development
Division of Environmental 1l4Lrsagement
P. 0, Boa 27687 -Raleigh, Us C. Z7611
ABCQRD
;4rrrRACMR }iY1 e� ► N �� �� ax�j+�l �N i f�L D.Z.LL.A3e�7 - - RM . NO. 2 S o 2
1. YELL LOCATION: (Show a sketch of the location on back of farm.)
Nearest Ten: 7-/-1 ❑,o -14 5 d� L L e- .. County. V' a S U r•1
quadrangle No.
]Road, Community, Subdivision, Lot No.
2. W=z Si pes►-a Re c eae•vice
3. ADMFSS: 712 SA -.�5e rT A2_� ;Tr44q5-,oU ll WELL DLkGRW: Draw a detailed sketch of Uh,
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slope, hilltop, valley, LIAt
5. USE OP i, ML: wA re►z DATE: 3 - Zq - z
6. TOTAL i]EP'TH.--_ r1C ? DIAMEi'ER: •
7. CASIZ+i4 RF3d Mi
feet diameter
MA 'VA
,"s._
8. SEAUM HITftRLALt
Neat Cement Sand cement
bags of asownt �? bags of amen ..
gain. of ►pater 8 yds. of sand
gale. of water
Type ma
eAu: dN�
a�• a r r. e r �- y �• y i� a
x do hereby oertify that this will
ahando mart record 3s true and exact.
3 - Z 7 - z.
Signature of Contractor or Agent Dwte
well showing total depth, depth and dia,met,
of screena remaining in the well, gravel
interval, intervals of casing perforations
and depths and types of fill materials use,:
5itilD LJ ee 6
' 0 Feel -TGj,qC
Z�=PTtl
l��e6:12 vu�re� F�zcTie
No IZe 4 o,�!
/Xj ryoGG' ,
Sutmit original to the Division of Environmental kmaiemen=, one copy to the Driller,
one copy to the Owner.
.30 LOWLsed 1011180

nvrtn VArolina
DoperF y f Natural Resources and Com - i Development
uivi■ion of Environmental Kanagement
WELL ASUMONKW P. O. Sox 27687 - Ralisigho N. C. 27611
RECORD
rW f leh k-
1. W= LOCATION: (Show a sketch of the location on back of form.)
Nearest Town t l�42J 40 6'0z e Countyy
QAadrangl a No.
Road, Commuaity, Subdivision, Lot No,
a vim: -� �
1-/1-L5 Ez o �pe r-T
3. ADDRESS: AtY3 *4s`ry S cicr4- RP,
_y.4ce. WELL DIAl3RAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the
4. TOPWRAPHY:draw,elope.hilltop,valiey,f_ t we11 showing fatal depth, depth and dia�metr
of 8creene remaining In the well, gravel
5. USE OF WELL: &J,47-r2 MTE: 3 - 2q-Z interval, intervals of casing perforations,
6. T'OTAL nm: -7/ Dz.Arg,TER:
and depths and types of fill materials used
T • CJ15II+Ei REMMr .. 6 `` D PPS gj-) fl
feet diameter
rtJfII AJ14
8. SF.AM0 X&T'FAIALt
Neat cement Sand cement
bagaof cement 7 bags of cement
gala. of rater 63 yde, of sand
gala, of crater
Other
Type material °�v �C..�72�^-Te
9. E MAIN MEMOD OF MYLACDOM OF
I do hereby certify that this well
abandonment record is true and exact.
-07-Z
Signature of Contractor or Agent Date
AAA CA 5,Aj
liv 11 dl, e .
See m -Pa IVAP
submit orisinal to the Division of Enrironmenral Management, one copy to the Driller.
%nd one copy to the Owner.
W-30 lovieed 10Illg4

ATTACHMENT C
INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Injectant is 1% milk solution in water, which is on the Aquifer Protection Section's list of approved
injectants.
A copy of the list is provided in Attachment C.

P r
die Name
facturer
Chemical Oxidation
"On -Contact" Fenian's Process
nla
Chemical Oxidation
Calcium Peroxide
n/a
Chemical Oxidation
Fenton's Reagent (FeSO{ & H202)
nIa
Chemical Oxidation
GeoCleanse
Chemical Oxidation
Hydrogien Peroxide
n/a
Chemical Oxidation
ISOTEC Fenton's Reacent
TMC Chemicals
Chemical Oxidation
Klozur CR
FMC
Chemical Oxidation
Ozone
nla
Chemical Oxidation
Potassium Permanganate
Carus Chemical
Chemical Oxidation
Re enOx
Regenesis
Chemical Oxidation
Sodium Permanganate
Carus Chemical
Chemical Oxidation
Sodium Pemutfale
nla
Chemical Oxidation
Soil Savers
Soil Savers
Chemical Reduction
Calcium Po suicide
n1a
Chemical Reduction
EHC
Adventus
Chemical Reduction
EHC-A
Adventus
Chemical Reduction
EHC-M
Adventus
Chemical Reduction
Emulsified Zero-Valent Iran
n/a
Chemical Reduction
Palladized Iron
n/a
Chemical Reduction
Sodium Bisulfite
nla
Chemical Reduction
Sodium Dithionits
n/a
Chemical Reduction
Sodium Metabisufte
n/a
Chemical Reduction
Sodium Suifile
Esseco USA, LLC
Chemical Reduction
Zero-valent Iron
NO
Chemical Reduction
ZVI & Molasses Slurry
n!a
nr>J
Enhanced Bioremediation
3-1) Microemulslon HRC-Advanced)
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremediation
ABC
RedoxTech
Enhanced Bioremediation
Ammonium Nitrate
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
Ammonium Phosphate
nIa
Enhanced Bioremediation
13AC-9
Shaw Environmental for EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
Bio-Dechlor INOCULUM
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremediation
Bio-Integration
ERC
Enhanced Bioremediation
Biack Biomass
VEETech
Enhanced Bioremediation
Blackstrap Molasses
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
Blue -Green Algae
nla
Enhanced Bioremediation
BOS 100
RPI
Enhanced Bioremediation
BOS 200
RP!
Enhanced Bioremediation
Butyric acid
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
Calcium Hydroxide
rVa
Enhanced Bioremediation
Calcium Propionate,
Niacet Corporation
Enhanced Bioremediation
CBN Nutrient Amendment
ETEC, LLC
Enhanced Bioremediation
CHITROREM SC•20 Chitin Com Iex
JRW Bioremediation, LLC
Enhanced Bioremediation
CHITROREM SC-80 Chitin Complex
JRW Bioremediation, LLC
Enhanced Bioremediation
CL-Out
Oserey Siotechnics
Enhanced Bioremediation
DI -Ammonium Phosphate
nla
Enhanced Bioremediation
EAS
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EHC
Adventus
Enhanced Bioremediation
EHC-A
Adventus
Enhanced Bioremediation
EHC-M
Adventus
Enhanced Bioremediation
EHC•O
Adventus
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 400
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 450
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 698
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 5981342 former) EOS
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 600
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
EOS 600EX
EOS Remediation
Enhanced Bioremediation
Ethyl Lactate
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
High Fructose Corn Syrup
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
HRC
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremedlation
HRC-X
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremediation
Hydrocien
nla
Enhanced Bioremediation
KB-1
SiREM Laboratories
Enhanced Bioremediation
Kelp
rda
Enhanced Bioremediation
Lactic acid
Na
Enhanced Bioremediation
Magnesium Sulfate (Epsom Salt
nla
Enhanced Bioremediation
Micro•Bac
Micro-Bac

Enhanced Bioremediation
Molasses
n/a
Enhanced 8ioremediation
Monosadium Phosphate
nla
Enhanced Sioremediation
Munox
Osprey Biotechnics
Enhanced Bioremediation
Neutral Zone
Remedlation &Natural Attenuation Services
Enhanced Bioremedlation
Newman Zone
RNAS
Enhanced Biaremediation
ORC
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremediation
ORC-Advanced
Regenesis
Enhanced Bioremediation
O-SOX
Adventus
Enhanced Bioremediation
Oxygen
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
Oxygen BioChem 08C
FMC for RedoxTech
Enhanced Bioremediation
PermeOx Plus
FMC
Enhanced Bioremediation
R713-1
Shaw Environmental for RedoxTech
Enhanced Bioremediation
Sodium Bicarbonate
Na
Enhanced Bioremediation
Sodium Lactate
n/a
Enhanced Bioremediation
m Pol meta has hate Lhuametaphos
rVa
Enhanced Bioremediation
So an Oil
We
Enhanced Bioremediation
SRC
Geovations
Enhanced Bioremediation
SRC-7
Geovations
Enhanced Bioremediation
SRC -ER
Geovations
Enhanced Bioremediation
SRS Substrate
Tema Systems
Enhanced Bioremediation
Sucrose
rda
Enhanced Bioremediation
Textral BR 50
Solae LLC
Enhanced Bioremediation
Textrol BR
Solae LLC
Enhanced Bioremediation
TRfPhasic 12
Micro-Bac
Enhanced Bioremediation
Urea
nla
Enhanced Bioremediation
Vdamin B12
BASF
Enhanced Bioremediation
Vitamin B2
BASF
Enhanced Bioremediation
WBC-2
SiREM
Enhanced Bioremediation
WMI-2000
WMI Internaticnal
Enhanced Bioremediation
Yeast extract
n/a
Enhanced Extraction
Aerosol OT-75
Science lab. corn, Inc.
Enhanced Extraction
Biosolve
Westford Chemical
Enhanced Extraction
Calfax 16L-35 Dowfax 8390
Pilot Chemical Com an
Enhanced Extraction
EnviroClean 165
Enviro Clean Products & Services
Enhanced Extraction
Grime Gitter
Clearwater Products, Inc.
Enhanced Extraction
MOB -I
Surbec Environmental, LLC
Enhanced Extraction
PetroSaiv
ETEC LLC
Geothermal Closed -Loa antifreeze
Environol
WFI Global, Inc.
Geothermal Closed -Loa antifreeze
Ethanol
rda
Geothermal Closed -Loa antifreeze
Pro ene Glycol
n/a
Geothermal Closed -Lao biocide
sodium h hlorite
n/a
Geothermal Closed -Loa corrosion Inhibitorpotassium
ortha hos hate
n/a
Geothermal Closed -Loop corrosion inhibitorpotassium
polyphosphate
nla
Geothermal Closed -Loa corrosion inhibitor
sodium polyphosphate
n/a
Geothermal Closed -Loop (relrioerant as
R-22
We
Geothermal Closed•Loo refri erani g asl
R407C
rVa
Other
Calcium Chloride
n/a
Other
Ferrous Sulfate
rda
Other
Nitrogen Gas
nla
Other
Ph asp horic Acid
n/a
Other
Sodium Chloride
nla
Other
Sulfuric Acid
rVa
Other
Xanthan Gum
rJa
H Adjustment
Acetic Acid
n/a
H Adjustment
Calcium Carbonate
We
H Ad•ustment
Magnesium Hydroxide
nla
H Adjustment
Sodium Hydroxide
n/a
Tracer
Eosin Dye
n!a
Tracer
Fluorescein ❑ e
n/a
Tracer
Halon 1211
nla
Tracer
Helium
n/a
Tracer
Potassium Bromide
n/a
Tracer
Rhodamine ❑ e
n!a
Tracer
Sodium Bromide
rVa
Tracer
Sulfur Hexafluoride
nla
Tracer
Tino al Dye
We
Tracer
Uramine Dye
We
Tracer
Xanthene ❑ e
n/a

h
BrownAND
Catdwett
-1 Y5,
4
..f

µwa
7
►MMw
Mw�iIYY-1 r•FORMER UST EXCAVATION,
BUILI±IN� �
f �
' hIW tTK
1 AMw•t8
t FORMER RESIN EXCAVATION
If
hlwna 5B•9* 1 Mw-19
625 11 -
_ ` sa•. tizvr
s
Plaw•s
vywe
1K
SOMM URS, SITE DACA M. FOVW 2
*PMw-a
0 4p 0D
SCALE IN FEET
EXPL ANKNON
CROSS SECTION LINE A-X
MW-5 GROUNDWATER K40WOR
MW-12 0 ARANOONFD WELL
RW-3 RECOVERY WELL
SS-2 • TEMPORARY WELL
Figure 2
SITE MAP
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACUM
718 EMSSM DRIVE
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROUNA

SIiE y�D�RY
l
I I
I ..
FORMER
WARE1,0JS
PRl"mo
-I @UILpIHC 'I
� s
I
I
sa:
SOURCE! UR% SITE DAGRtlM, FIGVFJ= 2
4 40 BD
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
MW-6 * MONITORklG WELL LOCATION WITH
(4D 6) NITRATE RE8(ATS IN MILLIGRAM:
PER LITER (.qfL)
• TEMPORARY WELL LOCATION WITH
NITRATE IN Met
NITRATE CONTOUR TO mqlL
Figure 3
GROUNDWATER
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR
NIITRATE, OCTOBER 20 10
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
718 BASSETT DR3VE
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

' 'BASSETT DRIVE
= i 1 F V � JT D _i i Y - _ �� _ - - - - ~
Ir
FORMER MANUFACTURING BUILDING r
r
r
FORMER I
WAREHOUSEI
i PRINTING ,
BUILDING
APPROXIMATE DIRECTION I �Q
Of GROUDWA TER FLOW r
10a so 0 Ion
I pJ LEGEND:
MW 0 MONITORING WELLS MOMIOREd ANNUALLY
+ MW.19 f _ rr ¢O PROPOSED INJECTION POINT
OFFICE
BLDG f / I = PROPOSED INJECTION MONITORING POINT
I / ,r
_ --- - L MW� I SOURCE; BASE MAP IS FROM A SURVEY RY ROCK AND CLARK. DATED IW15W ,
so
5410 Trinity Road
Palisades II, 50e 320
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
[919]233.91 78
NC Licerrse No- F-0705
s�
MW.,O
PMAL7
0
PM"
PROPOSED PILOT TEST LOCATION
FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC- FACILITY
718 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
A ' LI U IS 0 FIGURE 3

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells -- Tracer Injection
B_ PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: 8 hours
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: l
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 8 hours
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): NIA
2. Injection rate per well: 1 gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: 480 gallons per day (gpd); gallons per event (if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: 20 pounds/square inch (psi)
S. Temperature at point of injection: Ambient OF
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: During injection, a pressure
gauge and flow meter will be used to monitor injection pressure and flow rate.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: Unknown gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
( Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well, Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
(x Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Geologic Exploration, Inc.
NC Well Contractor Certification number: 3048
3. Date to be constructed: Mav 2011 Number of borings: I
Approximate depth of each boring (feet): 25
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: 10 to 25 feet below ground surface (ifmultiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
5. Well casing (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: (x PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:_
Casing depth: 0 to 10 ft.
6. Grout (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: (x Cement ( Bentonite ( Other:
Grout depth: 0 to 6 ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 7

jb WW 5 _ �I
_ � r
^'BASSETT DRIVE
I FORMER MANUFACTURING BUILDING •'
I
r
FORMER Ir
WA HOUSFJ `-"-- ••
PRI G ,
I BUILDI
I ,!
APPROXIMATE DIREcnON / OF OROUDWATER FLOW ti
I� RESIN AREA
{ i 0
` yh Mw Ts
FFICE 1 V
BLDG
1CG 56 0 10
LEGEND'
AAW 0 W>NRORPIE WELLS SAMPLED ANNUALLY
- - - - - - APPROXIMATE L WaS 04: SOIL EXCAVATION'
INFERRED 10 RVfL NITRATE GONCEMAATION CONTOUR
ib I
SOURrF! BASE MAP IS FROM A SURVEY 8Y SOrK AND CLARK, DATED 12715RII
'L OF EXCAVATION ARE FROM AOUATERA'S I WOUNDWATER SAMPLING REPORT"
APPROXIMATE EXT T OF NITRATE IMPACT IN GROUNDWATER
FOR R INGRAM PLYWOOD, INC. FACILITY
5410 Trinity Road PMW-a
Pomades It. Suite 320 BASSETT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
S919j233.9178
NC License No. F-0785 FIGURE 3

SOURCE- LR S. 511E f thGRW FIGLM 2
o ao en
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
MW-i * MONITOMNG WELL LOCATK>N
579.78 GROUNDWATER ELEVATK)K IN
FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
F igurr $
GROUNDWATER FLOW
DIRECTION, OCTOBER 2010,
FORMER U40RAM PLYWOOD PACRM
718 EOM TT DRIVE
THOMASVII..LE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
eMW.�---
HASSETT DRIVE
SJT F BOUNDARY
r� FORMER MANUFACTURING BUILDING
BUILDING
••.•� APPROXIMATE pRECT10N
! OF CiR"'DWATER FLOW
RESIN AREA
I r I
I 11 V 0 1\
` MW t9 �1 ,
C7FF+�'L 1 V
—1�tiI
100 50 0 11
LEGEND:
MN 0
MONfTORNG WELLS MONMORED ANNUALLY
•
PROPOSED INJECTION POWT
PROPOSED INJECTI0N MONITORING POINT
— — — — --
APPROXIMATE LWrTS OF SOIL EXCAVATION'
114FERRED 10 nVk NITRATE CONCENTRATION CONTOUR
SOURCE BASE MAP IS FROM A SURVEY BY BOAC AND CLAW( DATED 12l15m
'LIMITS OF VATICNJ ARE FROM AQUATERAS 1995 -GROUNDWATER SAMPLING REPORT
OPOSED PILOT TEST LOCATIONS
FORMER IN M PLYWOOD, INC. FACILITY
5410 Tdnity Road PMWa 718 BAS TT DRIVE, THOMASVILLE,
Brown Palisades II, Suite 320 VIDSON COUNTY, NC
Raleigh, Nash Carolina 27607
(919y233-9178
NC License No. F-0785 FIGURE 5

LFINNERTY I Mar 10, 2011 - 11:29AM I Dwg: FIGLIRE 6 CROSS SECTION revised { Layout ES -STD (8X11 LAND) I Path: PAPrcjec%Mngram114o681%CAD-ESrBaseMap
25 50
SCALE IN FEET
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=25'
i GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
¢ ON OCTOBER 26, 2010
z
w
z ® SILT/CLAY
Ctf
_D
905 [C 1L 805 OM FINEIMEDIUM SAND
wz
900 7 ¢ _j 9D0
r w .i
j 895 m 4 w 895 j
w W u7 q w
890 m 890 J
Q
N 885 a) 885 N
8, : > ' r 880 w
80
2875 ? 875 2
w w
p 870 870 p
¢ 865 885 ¢
cwu 860 88p LU
LL U_
855 855
850 850
Figure 5
CROSS SECTION A -A'
BrownAND FORMER INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
Caldweli 718 BASSETT DRIVE
SOURCE: URs, SITE DIAGRAM, FIGURE 2 THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

i*0
NCDEN R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Cohen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 26, 2011
William B. Demeritt, President
USI Realty Corp.
13925 City Center Dr., Suite 200
Chino Hills, CA 91709
Ref: issuance of Injection Permit W10400182
USI Realty Corp.
Winston-Salem, Davidson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Demeritt:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with the application received on March 25, 2011, and additional information received May 6, 2011. and
May 10, 2011, we are forwarding permit number WI0400182. This permit is to inject 1% milk solution to remediate
groundwater contaminated with nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and TKN at the Former Ingram Plywood Facility. 718 Bassett
Dr. Thomasville. Davidson County, NC 27360. This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30,
2013, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final
project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please read the
entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
Please pay special attention to Part VH.1 in the permit. The proposed monitoring plan included in the application
has been modified per the Additional Information received May 10, 2011.
You will need to notify this office and the Winston-Salem Regional Office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of
operation of the facility. In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you
must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at 919-715-6166
or Michael.Rogers(a—)ncdenr.gov if you have any questions about your permit.
Best Regards,
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
Underground Injection Control Program
cc: Sherri Knight, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Reinhard Ruhmke, Brown and Caldwell. 5410 Trinity Rd., Suite 320. Raleigh, NC 27607
W10400182 Permit File
Janet McDonnell, Division of Waste Management -Oberlin Office
Sean Boyles. Division of Waste Management -Winston-Salem Regional Office
AWIFER RROTE= TION S.—E.CTION
163G MaII SeMOR Center. R31e19T1, North Zamliria 27695-136
LOCauor r28 Capital Boulevard. Raleigr Norm Larotina:;Bfu Cl!'ie
prrom 91G-733.3:?1':AY T 91�+5.053_ r.. _ :,=, `:-=: ustome,Service I,8
lra!emet: wwx�.rcwaterqualhv.ym I�i��n�7ht��arnlin�
.u, naua: unMmsrmrn �frrmai1YC .c!Z' =_MVLt Ve �: ►'LLL L:1 f���1,

Rogers, Michael
From: Ruhmke. Reinhard [[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 4:42 PM
To: Rogers. Michael
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: RE: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Attachments: Application Form Att F revised 5_10_11.pdf
Hello, attached is the revised Attachment F. The only item that I did not change was to monitor PMW-7 during
the actual solution injection (2"' paragraph). This well is too far away (- 150') from the injection area to provide
any real-time injection monitoring data. Otherwise I have updated Attachment F to include PMW-7 in our pre -
and post -injection monitoring program.
Thanks Reinhard
From: Rogers, Michael[mailto:michael.rogers(a)ncdenr.gav]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 4:25 PM
To: Ruhmke, Reinhard
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: RE: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Reinhard -
The only other thing I need to draft the permit and forward to my supervisor For her review, and signature is a revised
Attachment F page indicating 3 additional temporary monitoring wells and PMW-7 will be monitored. This page currently
only shows monitoring well MW-10 being monitored.
Thanks
Michael Rogers. P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NO 27699-1636
Direct Line (919) 7,15-6166. Fax [phone] {put to my attn on cover letter)
htto-.0Dorta1.ncdenr. orclweb/wq/aps/gwpro/perm it- application s#g aothermApps
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Garohna Public Records Lax and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Ruhmke, Reinhard [mailto:RRuhmkei)BrwnCaid.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 4:32 PM
To: Rogers, Michael
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: RE: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Hello, attached is the additional information requested in your May 4 letter. I am also submitting the
information via email also to expedite approval.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 919-424-1435.
Thanks Reinhard

From: Rogers, Michael[maiIto: michagP.iWersOncdenrgovl
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:47 PM
To: Ruhmke, Reinhard
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Reinhard -
Please find attached an additional information request letter for the above referenced project. I scanned it in and am
mailing via email to expedite the permitting process.
Thanks
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn a cover letter)
h ttp : //port@ I. n cden r.org/we h/wq la ps/gwp ro/perm i t-applications#geotherm Apps
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records taw and may be disclosed to third parties

5410 Trinity Road
suite 320
Raleigh, INC 27607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.faruwnandcaldw Il.cam
May 6, 2011
Mr. Michael Rogers, P.G.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Ms. Shuying Wang, P.G.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Subject: Additional information Request
Injection Well Permit Application W 10400 182
Former Ingram Plywood Site
718 Bassett Drive
Thomasville, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wang and Mr. Rogers-
0 n behalf of USI Realty Corporation (USI), Brown and Caldwell (BC) is submitting this letter
that provides the additional information requested by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) in correspondence dated May 4, 2011
(attached), The NCDENR correspondence was related to Injection Well Permit Application
W10400182 for a proposed injection pilot test at the former Ingram Plywood Inc. (Ingrarn]
property located at 718 Bassett Drive, Thomasville, California {Site},
Past -injection Monitoring A groundwater remedial pilot test will be performed in the
vicinity of well MW-10 (see attached Figure 3 from the pilot test Workplan}, 0 n e injection
well will be installed to a depth of approximately 25 feet below ground surface (bgs) with
the screened interval between approximately 10 and 25 feet bgs. In addition, three
injection monitoring points will also be installed (see attached Figure 3 from the pilot test
Workplan) to a similar depth, A schematic drawing of the proposed injection well
construction is also attached,
Post -injection Monitoring. As requested, well PMW-7 will be added to the monitoring
program. Groundwater flow velocities have not yet been calculated because we do not
have soil porosity data. Hydraulic conductivity values in feet/day were calculated based
on slug -testing results. Brown and Caldwell will be collecting soil samples during injection
well installation activities and will be analyzing these soil samples for geotechnical
parameters such as density, porosity, and permeability, Groundwater flow velocities will
be calculated following receipt of geotechnical data.

May 6, 2011
Page 2
I hope that this additional information answers the questions raised in your May 4, 2011
correspondence. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
f WM4
I
Reinhard Ruhmke, P.G.,
Managing Geologist
Attachments: NCDENR Correspondence dated May 4. 2011
Revised Page 4 of Injection Permit Application
Figure 3
Proposed Injection Well Schematic
cc: USI Realty Corporation

FIGURE i
PROPOSED INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION
6 -INCH OUTSIDE DIAMETER BOREHOLE
METHOD DRILLED BY HOLLOW -STEM AUGER
STICKUP WELL VAULT
SURFACE GRADE
SURFACE TO 6 FEET BGS CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT
I -INCH DIAMETER PVC CASING
6-9 FEET BGS BENTONITE SEAL
5-25 FEET BGS SAND FILTER PACK
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER DEPTH - 13 FEET BGS
15 FEET OF I -INCH PVC WITH 0.02-INCH SLOT WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF WELL AT APPROXIMATELY25 FEET BELOW
GROUND SURFACE
NOTE: NOT TO SCALE

Rogers, Michael
From: Ruhmke, Reinhard [RRuhmke [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 06. 2011 4:32 PM
To: Rogers, Michael
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K- Wang. Shuying
Subject: RE: W 1 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Attachments: USI Permit Addendum 5_6_11 compiled.pdf
Hello, attached is the additional information requested in your May 4 letter. I am also submitting the
information via email also to expedite approval.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 919-424-1435.
Thanks Reinhard
From: Rogers, Michael [mailtoTmichael.rogers(ncdenr.govI
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:47 PM
To: Ruhmke, Reinhard
Cc: Macdonald, Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp.
Reinhard -
Please find attached an additional information request letter for the above referenced project. I scanned it in and am
mailing via email to expedite the permitting process.
Thanks
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
htt -11 ortaI-ncdenr.or /web/w la sl w rol ermit-a lications# eothermA s
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to [he !North Carolina Pubfic Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

�;AA
North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Reinhard Ruhnike. P.G.
Brown and Caldwell
5410 Trinity Rd.. Suite 320
Raleigh. NC 27607
NCDENR
Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
May 4, 2011
Re: Additional Information Request
Injection Well Permit Application W104I10182
USI Realty- Corp. - Former Ingram Plywood Faciliti
Thomasville, Da-vidsou County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Itulini ke:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
While reviewing the above referenced permit application our staff identified some items that need clarification
and/or additional information. Please address the following items:
There is some confusion on the correct number of proposed injection wells), construction., and location.
On page 4 of the application and there is one boring/well noted, but 3 temporary injection wells are
indicated on Attachment E. Also on page 4 the injection well has casing from a to 25 feet and screen
from 10 to 25 feet. Finally, if there is only going to be one injection well, none of the figures attached
show exactly where it will be located . Therefore, please provide a schematic of the construction of the
proposed injection well(s), a revised page 4 showing the correct well construction, and a revised site
map showing the location.
■ We would like to request monitoring well PMNV- 7 be added to the sampling plan. This is due to a
relatively high groundwater velocity rate (i.e. 51 ! feet per year) and a nearby creek, a potential surface
water receptor of any injected chemicals and/or contaminant plume displacement.
• Please provide the porosity used to determine groundwater velocity of 511 feet per year.
Please submit 2 copies of your responses with any corrected text pages/figures (same scale and page size) for
insertion and/or replacement into the previously submitted U1C Application within 30 calendar days of receipt
ofthis letter. Send one copy to my attention at the Central Office and the other copy to the attention of Sliuving
W cliff at the Winston-Salem Regional Office.
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
%36 Mail Service Center, Ral"ti. North Carolina 27699-1636
Location. 2728 Capital Boulevard. Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone. [phone] � FAX 1: 919-715.0588. FAX'.'- 919-715-6048 I Customer Service 1-8r rr-o23-&748
Intemel WWW.ncwateroualltV.oft7
AP Fvoal uppmwnpw Amrmative 1 Gxwo Emizver
One
NorthCarnlina
.Vatitrall f

If you have any questions regard__ your permit application please call m.. — [phone] or email me at
M ichael. Rogers�yn cdenr. gt)-,•.
Thant: you for your cooperation.
Best Regards,
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
cc: William Demeritt, USI Realty Corp., 13925 City Center Dr., Suite 200, Chino Hills, CA 91709
Sherri Knight, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Janet McDonald, Division of Waste Management -Oberlin Office
Central Office File, W10400182

Rimers, Michael
From: Rogers, Michael
Sent; Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:47 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Macdonald. Janet K; Wang, Shuying
Subject: WI 0400182 USI Realty Corp-
Reinhard -
Please find attached an additional information request letter for the above referenced project. I scanned it in and am
mailing via email to expedite the permitting process.
Thanks
USI Realty
Corp -Of
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
httr)://portal. ncdenr. ora/web/wq/aps/gwproir)erm it_ applicationsggecthermApps
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

AN-
..
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environmem, and Natural Fesolimes
Division of Water Quality
Beverly raves Perdue Colez-11 H Sullen-
Governor Director
March 31. 2011
William B. Demeritt
USI Realty Corporation
13925 City Center Drive - Ste 200
Chino Hills. CA 91709
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WI040018'
Former Ingram Plywood
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (5I)
Davidson
Dear Mr. Demeritt:
�C_ rrAPrnhr.
ja[;rat�� t
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on March'5. 2011. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed b}
Michael Rogers.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the
maximum of ipiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests.
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office. copied below, must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division. Please also note at this time. processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact Michael Rogers at 919-715-6166, or via e-mail at michael.rngers+a:ncdenr.gov. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT
Sincerely.
Uwn�,
jar Debra J. Watts
Supervisor
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Brown and Caldwell [Reinhard RuhmkO
Permit Application File W10400182
AQUl==_F RRDTEv71:]td 3_710N
IGA Mail Servim Leme: Rale+gt„ Norit- -,araim Z64�-ia r
Lc WIX,l 2728 �aoltal BGJi°van;. rai&gt . Norio -.amitna 2704
nmonc:S';.715-',.158°. 745.504F -lay-Lime,
I me r"vt wwh, non'amro valltV Ors
(11t:
NnrthC._ lw11_n.:
t .atr�,r�rlfr�

AQUIFER PROTECTIOiN SECTION - GROUNDWATEx PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: April 20, 2011 Permittee(s): USI Realty Corporation
Permit No.: W10400182
To: APS Central Office County: Davidson
Central Office Reviewer: Michael Ropers Project Name: Former Ingram Plywood
Regional Login No:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ SFR Waste Irrigation System ® UIC Well(s) RECEIVED I DENR / DVVQ
® New ❑ Renewal Apuilpf Prr]f^minn Sefton
❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification APR w � 2011
Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporationdlnfiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in silt remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ® Yes or ❑ No.
a. Date of site visit: April 20, 2011
b. Person contacted and contact information: Reinhard Ruhmke, Brown and Caldwell, 919-233-9178
c, Site visit conducted by: Shuying Wang
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ® No.
2, Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
❑ Yes or ® No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For SFR Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude: Method Used (GPS, GoogleTM, etc.);
e. Regulated Activities 1 Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For UIC Injection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional panes for each site
a. Location(s): 718 Bassett Drive, Thomasville -NC 27360
b, Driving Directions: From WSRO. Old Lexington Rd. SE about I min., then slight right at Thomasville
Rd. SE, about 9 mins, then continue onto NC 109 S._about 15 mins, then left to merge onto 1-85 BUS
NIUS-29 NIUS-70 E, about 4 minsthen turn right at Bassett Dr., destination will be on the right.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: High Point West, 35080-H1-TF-024
d. Latitude' 35.91007255 Longitude: 80.04961924 Method Used (GPS, Goog1eT11, etc.): GPS
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 1 of 6 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATE., 21 ROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description of Well(s) and Facilities — New, Renewal, and Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ 14eating/cooiing water return flow (SA7)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
® In situ remediation (5I)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L1 Non -Discharge")
❑ Other (Specify: �j
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ❑ Yes ® No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)?
ft.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? ft.
S. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ❑ Low ® Moderate ❑ High
7, For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes [] No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No,
If no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential
pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal and Modification Only:
I. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid
water, failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)?
❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation pennits (of anytvne), will
continued/additionallmodified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: Does not appear to, but needs to be monitored as
proposed in the application..
APS-GNU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 4 of 6 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTIONN SECTION - GROUNDWATEx PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Drilling Contractor: Name:
Address:
NC Certification number:
S. Complete and attach NEW Injection Facility Inspection Report, if applicable
V. EVAL UATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the Application:
2. Attach new Injection Facility Inspection Farm, if applicable
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
5. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit
when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition Reason
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 5 of 6 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTIOn SECTION - GROUNDWATEx PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑
Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional
information; ® Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature of report Preparer(s): f�
Signature of APS regional supen•isor: y f.'
Date: 1
VI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAND SITE MAP (Sketch of site showing House and waste irrigation
system, strra,Y or drip field, location of wellfsl, and/or other relevant information- SHOW NORTHARROW)
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 6 of Pages

UIFER PROTECTION SECT q ri.G. t�.We_ .�vpL 0�V�
i:Nis
APPLICATION REVIEW RE VEST FORM WR Q 4 2011
1 _ } Wnstan-Salem
Date: Ann I 211 I ; AegiIri-a! Office
R6r,� ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS ❑ David May, WaRO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ® Sherri Knight, W-SRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
lyiratfl: Michael Rogers Groundwater Protection Unit RECEIVER 1 QENR i UwQ
Aqu* PratPr: M Sedmn
Telephone: [phone] bb - Fax. [phone] APR 0 6 2011
E-Mail. Michael. Ro ers cLncmail.net
A. Permit Number: NVI 04001 H?
B. Owner: US1 Realty Corp.
C. Facility/Operation:
❑ Proposed ®Existing ❑Facility ❑Operation
D. Application:
I. Permit Type: ❑
Animal ❑
SFR-Surface irrigation❑
Reuse
❑ H-R Infiltration
❑
Recycle ❑
I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation
(ND)
®
UIC — 5 l Groundwater Remediation Well
For Residuals: ❑ Land App.
❑ D&M
❑
Surface Disposal
❑ 503
❑ 503 Exempt
❑
Animal
2. Project Type: ®
New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑
Renewal
❑ Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
NOTE:
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within, please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed APSARR Farm and attach laboratory analytical results, if applicable.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above. ff
RO-APS Reviewer: k V I ti CA U. e i ) f� Date: 414 / I 1
FORM: APSARR 07/06 1'age i of I

A UIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
wtt: April 1 _ 201
10: ❑
Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
❑ David May, WaRO-APS
❑
Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑
Andrew Pitner. MRO-APS
® Sherri Knight, W-SRO-APS
❑
Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Michael Rogers Groundwater Protection Unit
Telephone: [phone] Fa-r: [phone]
E--Mail: Michael.Rogers(a!ncmail.net
A. Permit Number: NV 111.It101 FZ
B. Owner, US I Realty° Corp.
C. Facility/Operation:
❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ❑ Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑
Animal ❑
SFR-Surface Irrigation❑
Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑
Recycle ❑
FE Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation (ND)
®
UIC — 51 Groundwater Remediation Well'
For Residuals: ❑ Land App.
❑ D&M
❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503
❑ 503 Exempt
❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ®
New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑
Renewal ❑Renewal wl Mad.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
NOTE:
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within, please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed APSARR Form and attach laboratory analytical results, if applicable.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail,
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer:
Date:
FORM: APSARR 0710(, 11age 1 of I

1 % Milk Solution Health Risk Evaluation
From: Rudo, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:41 AM
To: Slusser. Thomas
Subject: 1 % Milk Solution Health Risk Evaluation
Mr.Slusser, I have evaluated the information of the use of the 1 % milk solution for enhanced
bioremediation at the former Andrex Industries Corp Site in Asheville, NC, I have reviewed the
composition analysis and the statements regarding the absence of private wells and public water
use of the groundwater in the area based on the information provided for me in the 717/10 memo.
Based on this information, there should not be any significantly increased human health risks
upon the use of this remediation product. If you have any further questions regarding this matter,
please feel free to contact me at 919-707-5911. Sincerely Kenneth Rudo, Ph.O, Toxicologist,
OEEB
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Caroiina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to
third parties by an authorized State official. Unauthorized disclosure of juvenile, health, legally privileged, or
otherwise
confidential information, including confidential information relating to an ongoing State procurement effort, is
prohibited by
law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all records of this
e-mail.
Page 1

INJECTION EVENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
Permit Number U/ x 01100 t��
1. Permit Information
Permittee p -`
Y 1Md v �'N q ra w, 1' t� t
Facility Name
_ _:� i �e �a
Facility Address
2. Injection Contractor Information
! re tA-" A V / d V't � r* XPI c.
Injection Contractor 1 Company Name
Street Address t U I ti o 4ja W
aoq 4L'ti L' �C. '�-: P -�-
city State Zip Code
U 2?3 113h�
Area code — Phone number
3. Well Information
Number of wells used for injection
Well names [
Were any new wells installed during this injection
event?
0 Yes ❑ No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Type of Well Installed (Check applicable type):
❑ Bored [X� Drilled ❑ Direct -Push
❑ Hand -Augured ❑ Other (specify)
Please include two copies ofform GW-Ib jar each
well installed.
Were any wells abandoned during this injection
event?
❑ Yes q No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Please include two copies of the GW-30far each
well abandoned.
4. Injectant/ Information
!' 11 1k'
Injectant Type
Concentration al rrevi
If the injectant is diluted lease ingtate the source
dilution fluid.^0iIn lit v """
Total Volume Injected t"L kC,_sm 1 {o;g
Volume Injected per well M-c- ah
5. Injection History
Injection date(s)__ f 3 /t I
Injection number (e.g. 3 of 5) 09
Is this the last injection at this site?
qYes ❑ No
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE
INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE
INJECTION WAS PERFORMED WITHIN THE
ST DARDS LAID OUT IN THE PERMIT.
SIGNATURE OF INJECTION CONTRACTOR DATE
Pj.wl�la4'rj Auktn [� _
PRINT NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE INJECTION
Submit the original of this form to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of injection.
Attn: UIC Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-I636, Phone No. 9I9-733-3221
Form UIC-IER
Rev. 07109

NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2581
i. WELL CONTRACTOR:
BRIAN THOMAS
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Well Contractor Company Name
176 COMMERCE BLVD
Street Address
STATESVILLE INC 28625
City or Town State Zip Code
7L 04 872-7686
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION -
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMrT# NIA
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMiT#V aw caute)
SITE WELL ID #(# ■ppiieabie) INJ-1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring I( MurgcipaVPublic ❑
IndustriaYCormren�al p Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other ❑ [list use)
DATE DRILLED 06102/11
4. WELL LOCATION:
718 BASSETT DRIVE 27360
(Street Nara. Nurnh". Community. Subdivision, Lot No., Psrvef, TQ Code)
CITY: THOMASVILLE COUNTY DAVIDSON
TOPOGRAPHIC 1 LAND SETTING: (rhock appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ❑Fiat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE ' DMS OR DO
LONGITUDE ' DMS OR Of]
LatitudeAongitude source: BPS C]TopograpNc map
(location of well roust be shown on a USGS topo map andatfached to
this Harm r1 not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
INGRAM PLYWOOD CILiTY
NI
Fedity Name
Facility IDr (if applicable)
718 SETT QRWE
Street Address
T-{OMVILLE
NC 273W
_,-
City or Town
State Zip Code
USI REALTY. INC
Contact Name
_
13925 CITY CENJER DRIVE
Mailing Address
_ CHINO HILLS
CA 91709
_
City or Town
State Zip Code
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0 FEET
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EMSTING WELL? YES D NO [�
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .011B.
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST NIA
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount NIA
g. WATER ZONES (depth)'
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness)
7, CASING:
Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top O.Q_
Bottom 6.0
Ft, 1 INCH SCH 40 PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top 0.0
Botlom 3.5
F1. rORTLOtOaEr+rorrTE SLURRY
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
fit.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Dlameter Slot Size Malarial
Top 6.0
Bottom 14.0
Ft. I.O in. .010 ln. PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
10. SANDIGRAVEL PACTS.
Depth
Size Material
Top 5.5
Bottom 14.0
Ft 2G-49 FINE SILICA SAND
Top
Bottom
Ft
Top
Bottom
F 1.
= 11. DRILLING LOG
Top
Bottom
Formation Description
RED SILTY CLAY
TAN SILTY CLAY
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
112. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CFIRTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• ISA NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
wrS�EN PROVIDED TO�DvrNl]R
_,.. O$11fi111
~*-51�PJFrLR14TIFrE EE DATE
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing 8.0 FT. BRIAN THOMAS
(Use '+' if Above Top of Casing) PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Farm 109 b
Y P ty ' S� Rev. 2149
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.161, Phone: [phone]

d� STFlTsry�
r+
1. WL=LL CONTRACTOR;
BRIAN THOMAS
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2581
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION. INC
Well Contractor Company Name
176 COMMERCE BLVD
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT- Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated atior below land surface may require
a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
o. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST NIA
f. DISINFECTION; Type NIA Amount NIA
stree Address
: g. WATER ZONES (depth):
STATESVILLE INC 28625
: Top Bottom
Top Bottom
City or Town State Zip Code
: Tap Bottom
Top Bottom
70( 4 } 872.76M
Tap Bottom
Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thicknessr
2. WELL INFORMATION:
: 7. CASING: Depth
Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT# NIA
Top 0.0 BopomTS.o
FL 1 INCH SCH as PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(d applKmwe)
Top Bottom
Ft.
SITE WELL ID ill(H applicable) MP-1
: Top Bottom
Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring 3 Munippal/Public ❑
: 8- GROUT: Depth
Material Method
industriaVCommercda! Q Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ injection ❑
Top 0.0 Bottom 10
Ft. POIIT�ewloarre SLURRY
Irrigation❑ Other O [list use)
Top Bottom
Ft.
DATE DRILLED 06102 I1
Top Bottom
Ft.
4. WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: Depth.
Diameter Slot Size Material
718 BASSETT DRIVE 27360
:Top 5.0 Bottom 2D O
Ft. 1.0 in, -D10 In. PVC
(Steel Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lol No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Top Bottom
Ft. in. in.
CITY; THOMASVILLE COUNTY DAVIDSON
Top Bottom
Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC f LAND SETTING: (meek apprupnate box)
❑Slope oValley ❑Flat ❑Ridge pother
10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth
size Matertal
LATITUDE " DMS OR DID
— —
: Top 4.0 Bottom 20.0
Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND
LONGITUDE _ —' " DMS OR DD
:Top t3attom
FS.
Labtudellongitude source: BPS ©Topographic map
: Top Bottom
Ft.
(location ❑f vmN mast be shown on a USGS tope map andattached to
MIS Corm if not using GPS)
11. DRILLING LOG
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the vw+e11 is located-}
; Top Bottom
Formation Description
INGRAM PL)MDOD FACILITY NIA
0.0 J 7.0
RED SILTY CLAY
Facility Name Facility 1D# (If applicable)
7.0 1 14.0 `
TAN SILTY CLAY
71�_U8SSETT DRIVE
14.0 1 2t1.0
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
_
Street Address
J
THOMASVILLE NC 27360
City or Town State Zip Code
USI REALTY, It]
Contact Name
J
13925 CITYTDRIVE1
Mailing Address
J
HI[NO HILLS CA 91709
1
City or Town State zip Code
12. REMARKS:
BENTONITF_ FROM
( }
Area code Phone number
$FAL 3.0
TO 4.4_FEET _
B. WELL DETAILS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
C 2C, WELL CONSTRUG
ANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 20.0 FEET
.�� Rort�asBEENCR[7vpE
YVELLi]wTIER.
_r
h. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL7 YES ❑ N0 9
�1..R 0fi116/11
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 12.0 FT,
BRIAN THOMAS
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
: PWNTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Fen- 09 d
Y A tY - g, Rev. 2rag
1617 Mail Service Center, RaWigh, TIC 27699.161, Phone : [phone]

0
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
BRIAN THOMAS
N0NjkES1,QENn4L WELL ONMUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment Bud Natural Resources Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2581
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Well Contractor Company Name
176 COMMERCE BLVD
Street Address
STATESVILLE NC 28625
City or Town State Zip Code
7� 872-7686
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT# NIA
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT*(( appllceut) _
S1TE WELL ID Ofif applicabie] MP-2
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring I( MuNcipallPublic D
IndustnaUCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery D Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other p (list use)
DATE DRILLED 06102/11
4. WELL LOCATION:
718 BASSETT DRIVE 27360
(Streel Name, Numbers. Community, Subdiviaian, Lot No•, pars>el, Zip Code)
CITY THOMASVILLE COUNTY DAVIDSON
TOPOGRAPHIC HAND SETTING (chw* appropriate box)
❑ Slope ❑ Valley p Flat ❑ Ridge []Other
LATITUDE " DMS OR DO
LONGITUDE ' DMS OR CID
Latitudeflongitude source: BPS a0pograptrc map
(,ocabon of w+eN must be shown an a USGS lopo map andattached to
Mrs form if riot using CPS)
S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
INGRAM PL FACILITY
N
Facility Name
Facility IDa (if applicable)
718-BASSETT DRIVE
Street Address
_
T OMASVILLE
NQ 27360
City or Town
Stale Zip Code
I REALTY iN
Contact Name
1392E CITY CENTER
Mailing Address
PHINO HILLS
CA 91709
City or Town
State Zip Code
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 20.0 FEET
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO IV
d, TOP OF CASiNf3 is 2.5 FT. Above land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C _0118.
e. YIELD (gpm); NIA
METHOD OF TEST NIA
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA
Amount NIA
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thlcknesst
7. CASING: Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Topes_ Bottom 5.0
Ft. 1 INCH
SCH 40 PVC
Top Bottom
Ft.
Top Bottom
Ft.
A
: 8. GROUT: Depth
Material
Method
:Top 0.0 Bottom 3.0
Ft. Pn"' wawto, TE SLURRY
Top Bottom
Ft.
= Top Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth
Diameter Slat Stze Material
Top 5.D Bottom 20.0
Ft. 1.0 in.
010 in. PVC
Top Bottom
Ft. in.
in.
Tap Bottom
Ft. in.
In.
10. SAND1GRAVEL PACK:
Depth size Material
Top 4.0 Bottom 20.0 Ft. 2040 FINE SILICA SAND
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
0.0 1 7.0
7.0 J 14.0
14.0 1 20.4
1
1
1
1
I
12. REMARKS!
RED SILTY CLAY
TAN SILTY CLAY
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
: 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
WELL CONSTRUCT10N STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
R SaEENPROVMEDTOT OWNER.
06/16/11
SIGNATURE OK CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR— DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 12.0 FT. BRIAN THOMAS
(Use'+" If Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 34 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Farm 109
Y P nY ' 9� Rev, 2Ia9
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699461, Phone: [phone]

NONRESIDENTIAL ONliESIDENTIAL
WELL CONSTRL!_ ION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
•mow;; ,,•• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION
# 2581
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface'
BRIAN THOMAS
'Top of casing terminated ailor below land surface may require
Well Contractor (IndMdual) Name
a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
: a. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST NIA
Well Contractor Comparry Name
176 COMMERCE BLVD
I. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount . _ NIA
Street Address
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
STATESVILLE NC 28625
Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town State Zip Code
: Top Bottom Top Bottom
7i D4 ) 872-7686
: Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area Code Phone number
Thickness)
2. WELL INFORitAATION;
7, CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT# NIA
Top D.D Bottom 8.0 Fl. 1 INCH SCH 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITS{sf epplicawe)
: Top Botlom Ft.
SITE WELL IDrr(eappnwoe) MP-3
: TDp Bottom fl.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring 5( MunicipalfPublic ❑
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
IndusbiauCoMnercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ injection ❑
Top D.0 Bottom 4.0 Ft. "OR-116Ew11Nm SLURRY _
Irrigation❑ Other D (list use)
: Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 06/02/11
Top Bottom Ft.
4. WELL LOCATION.
: 9. SCREEN: Depth Dlarneter Slot Size Material
718 BASSETT DRIVE 27360
: Top &0 Bottom 13.0 Ft. 1.0 in. .010 in. PVC
(Sbeet N—. Numbers, Community. Subdrveaion, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
: Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: THOMASVILLE COUNTY DAVIDSON
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑VabeY CIFiat ❑Ridge []Other
10. SANDiGRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
LATITUDE " DlulS OR DD
Top 6-D Bottom 13.0 Ft. 2040 FINE SILICA SAND
LONGITUDE �' ' DMS OR DD
:Top Bottom Ft.
Latitudellongitude source: BPS OTopographie map
To Bottom Ft
p
(location of well must be shown on a LISGS topo map andatfached to
this loan if nor using GPS)
71. DRILLING LOG
S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Top Bottom Formation Description
IUGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY NIA
❑•0 1 4.0 RED SILTY CLAY
_
Faculty Name Facility DO (tf applicable)
: 4.0 1 8.0 TAN SILTY CLAY
718 BASSETT DRIVE
8-0 1 13.0 PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
Street Address
J
THO—M—MVIL.LE- _ NC 27360
1
City or Town State Zip Code
J
SIR TY INC
I
Contact Name
I
5 CITY CENTERDRIVE
1
Mailing Address
1
—gHINO HILLS CA 91709
City or Town State Zip Code
12. REMARKS-
SEAL TO fi-Q FEET
uBEtITONITE
Area code Phone number
FROM 4.0 ---
G. WELL DETAILS:
:.LgQjj6RE6yCERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE w17H
2C. WELL C.L]NSTRLIG710N ST bAR05. AND THAT A COPY pF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 13.0 FEET
O HASAE&N �RONDEor L owNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EMSTING WELL? YES ❑ NO IV
06! 16117
: SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL. CONTR OR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 12.0 FT,
BRIAN THOMAS
(Use'+' if Above Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
FDrmSubmit within 34 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, ReVL JO9 e
Y P tY ' g� Rev. 7JU9
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.161, Phone. [phone]

Jd� STA:l4
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
3 r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality
r
•��;;�•• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2581
1, WELL CONTRACTOR:
13RIAN THOMAS
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC
Welt Contraclor Company Name
176 COMMERCE BLVD
Street Address
STATESVILLE NC 28625
City or Town State zip code
7r oa 872-7686
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
d. TOP OF CASING is 2.5 FT. Above Land Surfaoe'
'Top of casing terminated attar below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA
METHOD OF TEST NIA
f. DISINFEc-nON: Type
Amount I�i,A
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
'Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT# NIA
: Top 0.0
Bottom 9.0
Ft. 2 INCH SCH aU PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMiT*(v appikabla)
Top
Bottom
Ft.
SITE WELL ID al{ir applkabia) P7,1
: Top
Bottom
Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring l( Municipal/Public ❑
lndusthal/Commercial ❑ Agricultural Q Recovery ❑ Infection ❑
IrrigalionLI Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED D6102111
4. WELL LOCATION;
718 BASSETT DRIVE 27360
(Street Name. Numbers, COmrtwlaty. Subdivlalan. Lot Na., Pamir 4 Code)
CITY: THOMASVILLE COUNTY OAVIDSON
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑ Slope O Valley QFlat ❑ Ridge ❑ Other
LATITUDE ' ❑MS OR DID
LONGITUD " DMS OR OD
Latitude/longitude source; BPS !]Topographic map
(location of wel4 must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form lint using GPS)
S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is locates[.)
INGRAM PLYWOOD FACILITY
NIA
Fac0ty Name
Facility IDIt (11 applicable)
718 BASSETT DRIVE
Street Address
THgMASVILLE
NC
7360
City ot Town
State
Zip Code
USI REALTY, INC
Contact Name
13925QITY CENTER DRIVE
Mailing Address
CHINO HILLS
CA
917D9
City or Town
State
Pip Code
Area code Phone number
8. GROUT-
Depth
Material Method
Tvp 0.0
Bottom 5.0
Ft.
POW ANOatt"T011M SLURRY
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Tvp
Bottom
Ft.
' 8. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 9.0
Bottom 19.0
Ft.
2,0 in. 010 in. PVC
Top
Botlom
Ft.
in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Site AMalertal
Top 7.5
Bottorn 19.0
Ft.
2040 FINE SILICA SAND
Tvp
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top
Bottom
Fonmation Description
0 1
8.0
RED SILTY CLAY
8.0 1
13.0
TAN SILTY CLAY
13.0 1
19D
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12. REMARKS:
9ENTDNtTE SEAL FROM 5.0
TO 75 FEET
ti, WELL DETAILS: - I Do HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED WACCORDAW- WITH
7C, WE 11 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF TwS
a. TOTAL DEPT19.0 FEET BEEN PROWDEDTO T L OWNER.
H:
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YE5 ❑ NO pi 06/16/11
: SIGNAT R E 1FIE0 WELL A DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 13.0 FT, B I N TH MAS
(Else '+` if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
FormSubmit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water quail Information Processing, Rev. 109
Y tY ' 9 Rev. 2I09
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone : [phone]