Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWI0400140_APPLICATION FOR PERMIT_20100603RECEIVED r laENR I DWQ State of North Carolina A001;rp vprlTprlIC'•1'i tiFC"SON Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells bracer Injection • Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater. ■ Submit TWO copies of the completed application and a]I attachments to the address on the last page of this form. • Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being retumed. Application Number (to be completed by DWQ): L._.1 `lam 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible patty): ARAMARx Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC Doug Helmstretler Senior Director, Environmental 2. Signing Official's Name*: Title: rnmv 7 ia7jr__E anr3 C>>stai nati 7 iYy * Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7. 3. Mailing address of applicant: 115 North First street City: BurbanK Telephone number: S916y 973-3772 E-Mail: doug.helmstetler@uniform.aramark.com State: CA Zip: 91502 Fax number: (818) 973-3848 4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): Same as above 5. Property Owner's mailing address: City: Same as above State: zip: 6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project: Name: Joseph P. Nestor, P.G. , P.E. Title: Project: Engineer Company: Nesc❑ Environmental, PLLC ■ J,---- . Pa Box 78222 City: Charlotte State: NC Zip 28271 Telephone number: (704) 442-1365 Fax number: Email Address: ioscoenv@carolina.rr.com H. PERMIT INFORMATION: L Project is: New ( Modification of existing permit ( Renewal of existing permit ►►ithout modification ( Renewal of existing permit with modification 2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide: existing permit number N/A and the issuance date N/A For renewal without modifications, fill out Sections I & II only, sign the certification on the last page of this form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner). For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date. Revised W09 U1C-5V5T Page I of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection Ill. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA A. FACILITY INFORMATION 1. Facility name: ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 2. Complete physical address of the facility: 509 Teague street City: Greensboro County: Guilford State: NC Zip; 27406-4313 B. INCIDENT ❑ESCRIPTION 1. Describe the source of the contamination: A Report for Preliminary Subsurface Investigation prepared in 1988 indicates it is believed that accidentai re eases of PCE occurred when a pressure reliet clevice opened on a ciry cleaning machine- Ikeetv tite baek doer at the Southwest earner af Hie fecility building. This report describes rha releases As i nar I vertPnY "de mi ni_mus" 1 asses _ The rPl PacPc4 PCp t--vidently flowed or was washed out the Lack door. Above -ground storage tanks (ASTS) were also located south of the facility and were used to store PCE. The former ASTs are also a potential source of PCE. PCE has not been stored or used at the facility since 1987. 2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g., gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticidesiherbicides, etc): nhi nri natPd prbanps M'F. T('F.. 1 . 2-7)rF] Petroleum products (These are unrelated to the release at the subject site and are not the target of this remediation activities. Monitoring wells associated with petroleum constituents are located on properties other than the subject property [MW-11C, NW-12C, MW-14B,MW-14C, & MW-15B].) 3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)? NO ( Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness N/A feet No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: 11,500 ppb 4. Agency managing the contamination incident: ( UST Section ( Superfund Section (including REC Progra and DSCA sites) ( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ( Solid Waste Section azar ous waste Sec ion ( Other: 5. Incident managers nameGene Mao - Guilford Countyand phone number (336) 64 -7777 6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contaminat' n incident: 5540 C. PERMITS Monitoring well MW-4A is "worst case' TVoC = 11,500 ug/1 on 10-29-2009 (last event) and 695,890 ug11 on 10-21-2003 (highest to date) List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident. including those not directly related to the proposed injection operation; 1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: 2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits: 3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits: 4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: City of Greensboro Special Discharge Permit No. S2042 for treated ground water discharged to sanitary sewer Revised 6Y09 UIC-51/5T Page 2 of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELLS) FOR INJECTION Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection IV, INJECTION DATA A. INJECTION FLUID DATA ] . List all proposed injectants. NOTE. Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (OEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES, Injectant: ReaerlQx oxidant Concentration at point of injection: Percent if in a mixture with other it Injectant: Concentration at point of injection: 11 percent by weight , Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: Injectant: Concentration at point of injection: Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: Injectant: Concentration at point of injection: Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: N/A 2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above: None ( Municipal water supply roue water rom pnvate well or any well within'/a mile of injection site [ Air { Other: 2,310 pounds of Part A plus 2,310 pounds of Part B in 5,019 gallons of water (41.884 pounds of water) 3. If any well within'/a mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply the following information: a. Location/ID number of source: N/A b. Depth of source: N/A c. Formation: N/A d. Rock/Sediment tvve: N/A e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site. NOTE. • If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit application form. You must apply, for a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using gpplication fomi G WRS. Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 3 of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Retnediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS 1. Duration of Injection: 4 to 5 months a. Maximum number of separate injection events: F r b. Expected duration of each injection event: 3-5 days c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): 3 to 8 weeks 2. Injection rate per well: 4-6 gallons per minute (gpm) 3. Total Injection volume: gallons per day (.gpd): 5482.3 gallons per event (if separate events) 4. Injection pressure: --200 pounds/square inch (psi) 5. Temperature at point of injection: ambient OF 6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: Digital flow meter and pressure gauges 7. Estimated, hydraulic capacity of the well: 4-6 gpm C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA I . injection will be via: { Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of your knowledge. ( Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as proposed construction specifications. 2. Well drilling Contractor's Name: Danny Summers of Geologic Exploration Company NC Well Contractor Certification number: 2579A Starting within 30 3. Date to be constructed: days of issuance of Number of borings; 18 per event: Permit Approximate depth of each boring (feet): 22 4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells: Depth: to feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth). Injection will occur from 5 to 22 feet below grade in DPT borings 5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods): Type: ( PVC ( Stainless steel( Other: NIA Casing, depth: to ft. 6. Grout (N/A if injection is through direct push rods): Type: ( Cement Grout depth: _ ( Bentonite ( Other: to ft. N/A Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Rem ediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection V. ATTACHMENTS Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings: A. SITE HISTORY Provide a brief description of the site history including: (1) site usage historically and present. (2) origin of the contamination, (3) previous remedial action(s). NOTE. • G.S. 89E 18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the public welfare or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their direction. G.S. 319E-13 requires that all drawings. reports, or documents involving geologic work prepared or approved by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist. B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include: (1) the regional geologic setting; (2) significant changes in lithology; (3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection. including a description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and (4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table. C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION Describe the chemical, physical. biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant. Attach the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within '''A mile of the injection site is used as the source well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here. D. INJECTION RATIONALE Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection_ including (1) goals of the injection project; (2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined; (3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and (4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change (biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface. E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to: (1) construction plans and materials: (2) operation procedures; (3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and (4) a planned injection schedule. Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 5 of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERNUT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection F. MONITORING PLAN Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including: (1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used; (2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and (3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection. NOTE: The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by- products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring parameters should include the target contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH. ORP, dissolved oxygen, and other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated reactions and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants. G. WELL DATA Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within '/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells. Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandonment record, if available. H. MAPS Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps: (1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and showing the location of the proposed injection site. (2) Site map including: a. all property boundaries; b. all buildings within the property boundary; c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s) d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage, treatment or disposal systems within 'A mile of the injection well or well system; e. all surface water bodies within''/4 mile of the injection well or well system; and f. all existing or abandoned wells within'/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells. (3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including: a. direction of groundwater movement b. existing and proposed monitoring wells c. existing and proposed injection wells (4) Contaminant plume map(s) including: a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines b. existing and proposed monitoring wells c. existing and proposed injection wells (5) Cross -sections) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including: a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines b. major changes in lithology c. existing and proposed monitoring wells d. existing and proposed injection wells Revised 6/09 UIC-5115T Page 6 of 8 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection Revised 6/09 UIC-5V5T Page 7 of 8 VL CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent) APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELLS) FOR INJECTION Ty pe 51 Webs —In Situ Ground►rater Remediation l Type ST Wells —Tracer Injection RFOEIUED r DEHR l DWa AQUJFPR PPOT rTION1 gFCTION NCAC 15A 2C .()21I(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows: JUN Q 3 2U10 1. f'or a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer 2. for a partnership or sole ptxiprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively 3. for a municipality or a state. federal. or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking publicly elected official 4. for all others: by the well owner. If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed b► the applicant that names and authorizes their agent. I hereby certify under penally of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in &s document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining said information. I believe that the information is true. accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are penalties. including the possibility of fines and imprisonment. for submitting false information. I agree to constwel. operate. maintain. repair. and if applicable. abandon the injection well(s) and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit. Printed Name and Title: 0ou4/1s1 �.*� s�e��� .r'l A;- r Signatur Date4 Vii, CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant) (-On-ner" means ant- person who halds the lee or other prrrpern' rights in the well heing constructed. A hell is real prriperr) and its construction an land shall he deemed lu rest ownership in the land owner. in the ahaence v)`' vontr w►3' agreement in writing.) As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to he constructed and operated_ l hereby consent to allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it ~hall he the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards (Title 15A ~CAC 2C .0200), Printed Natne and Title: Signature: Date: Submit TWA copies of the completed application package. including all attachments, to: UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1636 Telephone (919) 733-3221 Revised 6/019 C1C-5I15T Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT ► SITE HISTORY ATTACHMENT A C�ylli�:Il•�tilci7 1.0 Site Usage - Historically and Present The ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC site located at 509 Teague Street is an industrial laundry facility and uniform distribution depot. A previous owner of the subject property performed dry cleaning activities at the subject property. No dry cleaning activities have occurred at the subject property since 1987 or before. 2.0 Origin of the Contamination A Report for Preliminary Subsurface Investigation prepared in 1988 indicates it is believed that accidental releases of PCE occurred when a pressure relief device opened on a dry cleaning machine located near the back door at the southwest corner of the facility building. This report describes the releases as inadvertent "de minimus" losses. The released PCE evidently flowed or was washed out the back door. Above -ground storage tanks (ASTs) were also located south of the facility and were used to store PCE. The former ASTs are also a potential source of PCE. 3.0 Previous Remedial Action(s) A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system has been in operation at the subject site since July 1993- From July 1993 until September 2004, soil gases were drawn from three vapor extraction points {VE-1, VE-2. and VIE-3. On September 29. 2004. four additional vapor extraction points were brought on line (VE-4 through VE-7). A ground water recovery and treatment unit has been in operation since October 1997. Between October 1997 and September 29, 2004 ground water was recovered from one ground water recovery well (RW-1). On September 29. 2004. a second ground water recovery well (RW-2) was brought on line. Ground water is treated by an air stripper and then discharged to the sanitary sewer under a permit issued by the City of Greensboro. ATTACHMENT B HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT B HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 1.0 Regional Geologic Setting The site is within the Piedmont physiographic province and within the Carolina Slate Belt. The Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985) describes the bedrock underlying the site as "metamorphosed granitic rock" of Proterozoic to late Cambrian age. The map unit for this rock is GZg. 2.0 Significant Changes in Lithology Saprolitic soils lie above fractured crystalline bedrock. The saprolite is approximately 40 feet thick in the area where injection activities are to take place. A transition zone is present between the saprolite and underlying bedrock. The transition none is approximately 5 feet thick in the area where injection activities are to take place. A Comprehensive Site Assessment Report (CSA Report) prepared in May 1995 by RMT, Inc. {RMT} describes the site geology in more detail. The enclosed CD includes a copy of this CSA Report. A copy of cross section A- A' from the CSA Report is attached to this application package. 3.0 Hydraulic Parameters In 1995, RMT performed numerous slug tests on project monitoring wells. The results for the slug tests were summarized in a Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum (CSA Addendum Report). RMT reported that the geometric mean hydraulic conductivity for slug test performed on fifteen saprolite wells was 7 " 10-5 centimeters per second (cmis). RMT reported that the geometric mean hydraulic conductivity for slug test performed on ten transition zone wells was 9 * 10.5 cmis. And RMT reported that the geometric mean hydraulic conductivity for slug test performed on four bedock wells was 4 * 10"5 cm/s. A copy of the complete CSA Addendum Report is included on the attached CO. 4.0 Depth to the Mean Seasonal High Water Table The depth to the to the Mean Seasonal High Water Table in the vicinity of the area where the injection is to take place is approximately 30 feet below grade. ATTACHMENT ❑ INJECTION RATIONALE ATTACHMENT 0 INJECTION RATIONALE i.0 Goals of the Injection Project The goals of the injection project are to reduce the mass of residual VOCs remaining the vadose zone 2.0 Explanation and/or Calculations of How the Proposed lnjectant Volume and Concentration Were Determined In March 2010, Nesco Environmental collected soil and ground water samples from the site. Measurements of various geochemical parameters in ground water were determined in the field. Samples of soil and ground water were submitted to commercial laboratories for additional analyses. A copy of an April 12, 2010 report is attached and summarizes the findings. Nesco Environmental solicited proposals from several vendors of remediation chemicals with respect to their proposed technical approach to achieve the stated goals of the injection project. Nesco Environmental recommended that the proposal from Regenesis be implemented based upon a thorough review of the proposals. Regenesis performed calculations regarding the volume and concentration of the injectant. A copy of an e-mail from Regenesis is attached and includes an attachment which is output from a spreadsheet and shows the calculated volumes. 3.0 Description of the Reactions between the Injectants and the Contaminants Present Including Specific Breakdown Products or Intermediate Compounds That May Be Formed by the Injection Nesco Environmental requested that Regenesis provide it with information regarding specific breakdown products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection of RegenOx into the subsurface. Regenesis provided the following information: Oxidation of PCE Intermediates Formed: a. Dichloroacetic acid b. Trichloroacetic acid c. Chloral d. Methylene chloride e. Chloroform Oxidation of TCE Intermediates Formed: a. ❑ichloroacetic acid b. Trichloroacetic acid c. Chloral d. Dichloroacetaidehyde e. Trichioracetaldehyde f. Methylene chloride g. Chloroform 4.0 Summary Results of Modeling or Testing Performed to Investigate the Injectant's Potential or Susceptibility to Change Conditions (Biological, Chemical or Physical) in the Subsurface Nesco Environmental requested that Regenesis provide it with information regarding results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change conditions (biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface. Regenesis indicated that it is expected that an increase will occur in the following parameters immediately after the injection of RegenOx� pH, DO, CRP, specific conductance. iron, silica, sodium, and carbonate 1 Environmental April 12, 2010 Samuel Niemann, CPG The Wetlands Company, L.L.C. PO Box 40998 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240-0998 Re. Source Area Soil and Ground Water Evaluation ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc. 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Niemann: Nesco Environmental. P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) conducted source area soil and ground water sampling to gather information necessary to identify a technical approach and estimate of costs to reduce contaminant impacts to soil and ground water in this core area. The primary contaminant at the site is tetrachloroethene or perchloroethylene (PCE). An earlier assessment report prepared in 1988 indicates it is believed that accidental releases of PCE occurred related to former PCE dry cleaning at the facility. PCE has not been stored or used at the facility since 1987. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system has been operating at the site since July 1993. A ground water extraction and treatment system has been operating at the site since October 1997. Although these remediation efforts have resulted in relatively significant decreases in the concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water, Nesco Environmental is interested in hastening remediation by the injection of oxidizing chemicals, bio-stimulants, biological agents. andlor other materials in the source area at the site. Environmental and Geologic Services P❑ Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@carolina.rr.com Mr. Sam Niemann The Wetlands Company, L.L.0 April 12, 2010 Page 2 The site is within the Piedmont physiographic province. Saprolltic soils lie above fractured crystalline bedrock. The saprolite is approximately 40 feet thick in the area where injection activities are to take place. The water table is present within the saprolite at a depth of approximately 30 feet below grade. A transition zone is present between the saprolite and underlying bedrock. The transition zone is approximately 5 feet thick in the area where injection activities are to take place. The transition zone has higher measured permeability than the saprolite and is believed to act a preferential pathway for ground water flow. On March 4, 2010. Nesco Environmental collected soil samples to better characterize the site for remediation by injection of remediation chemicals or substances. Twelve soil borings (Borings A through K) were advanced by direct -push techniques (DPT) south of the facility building were PCE impacts are known to be present or are suspected. Figure 1 shows the locations of these twelve borings. One soil boring (boring L) was advanced north of the suspected source areas and is intended to represent background conditions site. Each boring was advance to DPT refusal. Samples were collected from the twelve source area borings at approximately 5-foot intervals. These samples were screened with a photo - ionization detector (PID). A sample from each of these twelve borings was submitted to a commercial laboratory for VOC analyses. With the exception of the sample from boring E, the samples submitted for VOC analyses corresponded to the highest PID screening reading. Samples from borings B. E. and L were also analyzed in a commercial laboratory for Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). A sample from boring L was submitted to FMC Corporation for analyses for soil oxidant demand. FMC used persulfate as the oxidant and sodium hydroxide as an activator. Table 1 summarizes the results for the analyses of soil samples. Copies of laboratory reports are included in Appendix I. Boring A was advanced near the back door where PCE from the building was reportedly released and borings G and H were advanced in the vicinity of the former ASTs. On March 5, 2010, Nesco Environmental collected ground water samples from monitoring wells MW-28. MW-3A. MW-3B, MW-4A, and MW-48 to better characterize the site for remediation by injection of remediation chemicals or substances. The screens for monitoring wells MW-3A and MW-4A are reportedly completed within the saprolite and straddle the water table. The screens for monitoring wells MW-2B and MW-313 are reportedly completed within the fractured crystalline bedrock. The screen for monitoring well MW-48 is reportedly completed within the transition zone. Nesco Environmental lowered the probe of a Mr. Sam Niemann The Wetlands Company. L.L.0 April 12, 2016 Page 3 YSI ProPlus multi -parameter meter into these monitoring wells. After the reading stabilized, Nesco Environmental recorded various field parameters which are summarized in Table 2. Nesco Environmental pumped water from monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-3B. MW-4A, and MW-413 though a flow cell into which the probe of the multi -parameter meter was inserted. Table 3 summarizes the results for measurements taken using the flow cell. Nesco Environmental collected samples from monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-4A, and MW-4B for laboratory analyses for total iron, total manganese. dissolved iron, dissolved manganese, nitrogen as nitrite, nitrogen as nitrate, nitrogen as nitrite and nitrate. sulfate, TOC, and COD. Table 4 summarizes these laboratory results. Copies of laboratory reports included as Appendix I, Appendix II includes photographs which illustrate accessibility to possible injection areas. It should be noted that monitoring well MW-3B is a "stick-up" well and it may not be possible to position a drill rig west of MW-313 at the present time. Nesco Environmental intends to cut down the "stick-up" to approximately 6 inches above grade so DPT drill rigs can access the area west of this well. The recovery wells and monitoring wells in the target area are constructed of stainless steel. SVE wells in the target area are constructed of poly vinyl chloride. Injected chemicals must not be destructive to the existing wells. If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President JPNIjpn 20100412 TABLES TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED ON MARCH 5, 2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, L.L.C. 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA y K j z N iu is w d m r- m m z � N [7 Z mm p �y C z :C ;� � � i m z t ; 21 � O x -1 to Q � C) oe g n fQ 9-0 U3 = co m C7 0 �r w G7 _ 3 x c ❑ 0 (7 z ,Q m en as _ a rn p rn 7bv ra _ eo rn _ se oQ U3 z p n z n Z n D p a� r- a p � a y a r ) 4❑ p n n n r � n 0 C n p n n = m m y 2 m rn Q m v 2 p 2 v Q Q z m Q m L 7v N .._. Cal z en m ❑ Z T -I O m m Z z m G] m m m rn m m 2. p m m ran z z p Q z m m z m m z m v A-5 31.2 226 <3.7 <3.7 1.120 7.5 <3.7 <3.7 30 540 284 <3.7 <3.7 <7.3 32-137.5 NA NA NA B-20 34.1 <100 <5.0 <&O <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 2.780 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 2 780 <500 74 NA C-20 9.8 <83-6 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4,2 <8A 0.0 NA NA NA D-15 8.2 <97A <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <4.9 <C9 <4,9 <9,7 0.0 NA NA NA E-33 2.9 <78.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3,9 <3.9 <7.8 0-0 <500 fib NA F-5 6.2 <104 <5.2 <5.2 <5-2 <5,2 <5.2 <5.2 <5.2 <5.2 <5.2 <5.2 <10.4 0-0 NA NA NA G-20 51.8 78.5 <3.8 3.8 4.300 12.6 <3.8 17,400 <9,800 <3.8 <3.8 15.3 21.820-2 NA NA NA H-15 61 A <77.6 <3.9 <19 16.4 <3.9 <3.9 2.460 6.8 <3.9 <3.9 <7.8 2.483-2 NA NA NA I-15 14.1 <99.7 <5.0 <5.0 <5,0 <5.D <5.0 14 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 14.11 NA NA NA J-5 8.8 181 <3-8 <3,8 <3,8 <3.8 <3.8 2NJA 13.9 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 <7.7 20C9 NA NA NA K-5 3.1 <74,1 10-8 <3.7 14.3 <3.7 31.i<3.7 <3.7 23 7 9.5 <7.4 97-7 NA NA NA L-10-15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 769 99 1.5 ppm-v - PARTS PERMILLION BY VOLUME µglkg - MICROGRAMS PE KILOGRAM mglkg - MItLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM mg/l -MILLIGRAMS PER LITER g persulfate / kg soil - GRAMS Of PERSULFATE PER KILOGRAM OF SOIL NA - NOT ANALYZE0 FOR THI5 PARAMETER TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS MEASURED IN SITU MARCH 5, 2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, L.L.C. 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA v m0 p x cn o �> m o -0__q m 0 M U C rn-0 06 3 _uC CD OO _ rim m C C2 mz < Z X p m .� Z-_ C -- -i m 0= x r-C r> -n m m Z z G27 a m m MW-213 09:15 28 18.1 2.73 6.10 188.9 MW-3A 12:30 36 18.6 5.49 6.32 316.7 MW--313 13:05 45 18.4 6A 6.37 293.6 MW-4A 10:45 21 18.4 5.50 7.94 266.9 MW-4B 09:45 43 18.6 0.83 7.89 203.7 °C - DEGREES CELSIUS mg/l - MILIGRAMS PER LITER SU -STANDARD UNITS mV - MILIVOLTS MEASUREMENTS MADE BY NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L. L.C. USING YSI PRO PLUS METER. NESCO ENVIRONEMNTAL IS CERTIFIED AS A FIELD LABORATORY BY NCDENR (CERTIFICATION NO. 5562) TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS MEASURED USING FLOW CELL MARCH 5, 2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, L.L.C, 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA MW-3A IT �m o m 0 m nc> 0 � w �25 m m 6mm ❑ C)X q c2 Cz� C V' n0 vx c K m m z �m ❑ z m T r r 12:50 0.1 19.7 8.61 6.97 290.3 12:51 1.0 18.9 8.27 6.79 285.0 12:51 1.5 18.8 8.11 6.67 285.9 12:51 2.0 18.8 8.04 6.60 286.9 12:51 4.0 18.7 7.92 6.53 288.0 12-51 5.0 18.8 7.96 6.47 290.4 12:51 6.0 18.8 8.06 6.38 295.3 MW-3B >1a 410 mz o a m° m cn M K g K a ao m rmr* 0 "� En 0 v� c Czm z0C �-q - -gym 5;v m m z �m m T r r 13:09 0.1 17.7 6.95 6.70 294.5 1110 1.0 18.7 6.22 6.58 290.4 13:10 2.5 18.8 5.38 6A7 283.7 13:10 4.0 18.8 5.29 6.40 280.5 13:10 5.0 16.5 5.33 6.36 280.3 13:10 &0 18.8 5.36 1 6.33 280.5 13:10 7.5 18.8 5.40 6.35 281,E 13:10 9.0 18.8 5.43 6.31 282.7 1310 10.0 18.8 5.43 6.32 283.2 'C - DEGREES CELSIUS mg/I - MILIGRAMS PER LITER SU -STANDARD UNITS mV- MILIVOLTS MEASUREMENTS MADE BY NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C. USING YSI PRO PLUS METER. NESCO ENVIRONEMNTAL IS CERTIFIED AS A FIELD LABORATORY BY NCDENR (CERTIFICATION NO. SS62) TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF GEOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS MEASURED USING FLOW CELL MARCH 5, 2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, L.L.C. 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA M W-4A an O m_v Q m cam o C d 3 m? r m n� v ci u,-n0 x �v 0 C m �_ m Sm a z p z r m r 10:55 0.1 17.0 8.52 8.02 270.2 10:57 0.2 18.1 8.43 7.74 256.4 11'01 0.3 18.1 8.47 7.48 249A 11:04 0.4 18.1 8.45 7.30 249.7 11:06 0.5 18.0 8.19 7.21 249.5 11:06:30 INCREASED FLOW RATE 1107 1.25 18.9 8.90 6.93 260.0 11:10 2.5 18.9 9.09 6.90 260.0 1112 3.5 18.9 9.22 6.84 260.0 1113 4.0 18.9 9.23 6.85 258.3 11 :14 PUMPED DRY AFTER REMOVING 5 GALLONS; DECREASED FLOW RATE 1115 5.6 19.5 6.90 6.90 254.8 1120 5.6 18.7 6.77 6.77 254.8 11:25 5.7 18.7 6.75 6.75 254.4 1130 5.8 18.3 6.74 6.74 318.7 MW-4B nn m_ a x m O L)'m m o �n _o- 3 m m 0�m n� � o cm C Zm imp x �a 0 m � m m o z p z r T r 10:04 0.1 18.4 3.50 8.58 189.2 10:07 0.2 18.3 2.89 8.80 189.6 10:09 0.5 18.9 3.25 9.01 190.1 10:12 1.5 19.2 4.14 9.38 192.8 10:17 3.0 1 19.4 - --1 190.3 10:24 4.0 - - -- 10,26 5.0 1 19.2 6 75 7.65 271.5 °C - DEGREES CELSIUS mg/f - MILIG RAMS PER LITER SU -STANDARD UNITS mV - MILIVOLTS MEASUREMENTS MADE BY NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C. USING Y51 PRO PLUS METER. NESCO ENVIRONEMNTAL iS CERTIFIED AS A FIELD LABORATORY BY NCDENR [CERTIFICATION NO. 5562] TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF GEGCHEMICAL PARAMETERS MEASURED BY LABORATORY ANALYSES SAMPLES COLLECTED ON MARCH 5, 2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, L.L.C. 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 0 o z z cn m � z ° -� > n D a o O cn a C mm m G) ._z z .,m-i C O m 3> s c z c�a m 3 c� � 3 z cn 3 cn y 3 T cn O 3 cn m z 3 x o "0 "> "© �> z � cn � � z � c 0 rnm �-m `"n � G) m Z � O G7 z z C? z z > m m m ct)m m A O � y m m z z a MW-3A 24.700 0.323 1.880 0.0453 2.3 18.7 21.0 37.8 12.2 37.8 MW-4A 2.290 0.0521 0.257 0.0156 1.9 0.40 2.3 40.8 3.7 40.80 MW-4B 0.0975 0.0068 0.0546 0.0176 6.2 <0.10 6.20 39.3 8.5 <25.0 mg/I - MILIGRAMS PER LITER APPENDICES APPENDIX I LABORATORY REPORTS Face Analytical S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, tric. ;aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside or 9600 1<indey Ave Suite m psceiab+-um Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersvdie. NC 28078 (828)254-7176 March 22. 2010 Mr. Joe Nestor Nesco Environmental PO Box 78222 Charlotte. NC 28271 RE. Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Dear Mr. Nestor Enclosed are the analytical results for samples) received by the laboratory ❑n March 05, 2019. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report. Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received. If you have any questions concerning this report. please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Renee Spencer renee.spencer[�7a pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc. (704)875.9092 Page 1 of 33 a Pace Analytical S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 WWW pacelaha rom Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28076 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 Project. ARAMARK - GS4 Pace Protect No.. 9264745 Charlotte Certification IDS Connecticut Certification #: PH-0104 98DO Kincey Ave. - Ste 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 Kentucky LIST Certification #: 84 Louisiana/LELAP Certification #: 04034 New Jersey Certification * NCO 12 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706 North Carolina Field Services Certification #. 5342 North Carolina Wastewater Certification #; 12 CERTIFICATIONS Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00764 South Carolina Certification #: 990060001 South Carolina Drinking Water Cert. # 990060003 Tennessee Certification #: 04010 Virginia Certification #i 00213 West Virginia Certification # 357 FloridaFNELAP Certification #: E87627 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall no[ be reproduced, except rn full. without the written can sent of Pare Analytical Services, inc. Page 2 of 33 y Pace Analytical6 s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave Suite 700 ,wwr.,7dcelaos wrrr Asheville_ NC 28804 +(untersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (70L4)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project ARAMARK - GSQ Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: A-5 Lab 1D. 9264745001 Collected 03/04/10 09:00 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matnx: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA8260 Acetone 226 uglkg 73A 1 03/10/10 01:05 674A-1 Benzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 71-43-2 Bromobenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 74-97.5 Bromodichloromethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03110/10 0 1:05 75-27-4 Bromoform ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 OV05 75-26-2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 7.3 1 0311011001:05 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO uglkg 73.4 1 03110/10 01:05 78-93-3 n-BWbenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03f1O114 01:05 104-51-8 sec-Butyibenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 135-98-8 tent-Butylbenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/1Oil 0 0105 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311Oil 0 0105 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/1Oil 0 0105 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg T.3 1 03/10/10 01:05 75-00-3 Chloroform ND uglkg 3.7 1 0300110 01:05 67-66-3 Chloromethane NO uglkg 7.3 1 ON10/10 01 T5 74-07-3 2-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 17 1 03/10/10 01:05 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3- chi oropropane NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311011001:05 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane NO uglkg 17 1 03/1Oil 0 01:05 124-48-1 1.2-Dlbromoethane (EDB) NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03110/1001:05 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 17 1 0311011001:05 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03110/1001:06 10646-7 Dichtorodiiluoromethane NO uglkg 7.3 1 03/10/10 01:05 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03110/1001:05 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01'05 75-35-4 as- 1.2-0ichloroethene 1120 uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 156-59-2 trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene 7.5 uglkg 3.7 1 03/1Oil 001:05 156-60-5 1,2-0ichloropropane ND uglkg 3.7 1 D311 Oil 0 01 :05 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.7 1 0311 Oil 0 01 :05 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane N❑ uglkg 3.7 1 03/1Oil 0 01:05 594-20-7 1,1-❑ichloropropene N❑ uglkg 3.7 1 03/1 Oil 0 01 :05 563-SB-6 cis- 1.3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.7 1 0311Oil 0 01:05 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.7 1 ON10140 01:05 10061-02.6 Diisopropyl ether ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/1Oil 0 01'O5 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene ND ugAg 3,7 1 03/10/10 01:05 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/1011001:05 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 36.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 591-78-8 isopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene ND uglkg 3.7 1 0311011001:05 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride ND uglkg 14.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND uglkg 36,7 1 03/10/10 01:05 108-10-1 Methyl -tent -butyl ether ND uglkg 3.7 1 03f10110 01:05 1634-044 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consennttt of PFPacee+Analybral Services, Inc. E Page 3 of 33 Pace Analytical 5 a, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, inc. 2aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr 4800 Kincey Ave Suite 100 www wre�ans wm Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28076 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No. 9264745 Sample: A-5 Lab 1D: 9264745001 Collected: 03/04/10 09-00 Received: 03/05110 16 33 Matrix Solid Results reported on a "dry•weigh I" basis Parameters Results Units Report Lim l OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Naphthalene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 103-65.1 Styrene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 100-42-5 1.1.1.2- Tetra chi oroetnane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 630-20-6 1.1,2.2- Tetra chiofoethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10110 01:05 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene 30500 uglkg 1830 500 03/10/10 16:48 127-18-4 Toluene IN uglkg 3.7 1 0311 Oil 01:05 108-88-3 1.2.3-ThchIorobe nzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/1001 05 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichi orobe nzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 120-92-1 1,1.1-Tnchioroethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 71-55-6 1,1.2-Trichicroethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311011001.05 79-00-5 Trichloroethene 284 uglkg 3.7 1 0311Oil 001 05 79-01-6 Trichlarofluoromethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311 Oil 01:05 75-69-4 1,2.3-Trichloropropane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03110110 01:05 96-18-4 1,2.4•Trimethylbenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01-05 95-63-6 1.3,5-Trimethyl bell zene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01 05 108.67-8 Vinyl acetate NO ugAg 36.7 1 03/10110 01:05 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND uglkg 7.3 1 03/10/10 01 05 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) NO uglkg 7.3 1 03/10/10 01:05 1330-20-7 M&p-Xylene NO uglkg 7.3 1 03/10/10 01 05 1330-20-7 o-Xylene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 01:05 95-47-6 Dibromofluorome(hane (S) 126 % 79-116 1 03/10/10 01:05 1868-53.7 Toluene-d8 (S) 91 % 88-110 1 03110/10 01 05 2037-26-5 4-Bromoflucrobenzene (S) 79 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 01:05 460.00-4 1,2-Dichloroelhane-0 (S) 122 % 69-121 1 03110110 01:05 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 12.1 % 0.10 1 03108/10 15725 E $2 S2 bate: 03122/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 33 This report shall not he reproduced. axcept 4n full. without the wntten consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. rmla&. e Pace Analytical S, f, Inc. Pace Analytica I Services. Inc. aceAnal fi c' J 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersvdle, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 17o4j875.9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample. B-20 Lab lD. 9264745002 Collected: 03/04/10 09:50 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qua) 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. EPA 8260 Acetone NO uglkg 100 1 03/10/10 01 23 67-64-1 Benzene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 0300110 01:23 71-43-2 Bromobenzene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 108-86-1 Bromochloro methane NO uglkg 5.0 1 =10/10 01:23 74-97-5 Bromodirhioromethane ND uglkg 5.t} 1 03/10/10 01:23 75-27-4 Bramoform ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 0113 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 01:23 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO uglkg 100 1 03(10/10 01:23 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03110M0 D1:23 104-51-8 sec -Butyl benzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10110 01:23 135-98-8 tert-Butyl benzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 01:23 75-00-3 Chloroform NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311 D110 01:23 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND uglkg 10 1 owl oil 0 01:23 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoiuene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 95-49-8 4-Chtorotoluene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01 '23 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311 O110 01:23 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01 23 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311 Oil 01:23 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311ON0 01'23 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311011001:23 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene N ❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 106-46-7 Dichloradifluaromethane NO uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 01:23 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011001:23 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01;23 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 75-35-4 cis -1,2-DichIoroethene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/1001'23 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 156-60-5 12-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/1011001:23 78.87-5 1,3•Dichloropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1001:23 142-28.9 2,2-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 594-20-7 1,1-Dichlorapropene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 563-58-6 ds-1,3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03110/10 01:23 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 108-20-3 Ethyibenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01.23 100-41-4 Hexachlaro-1 ,3-butadiene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 50.0 1 Owl 0/1 O 0113 591-7" Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01 23 98-82-8 p-Isopropyitoluene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10110 01:23 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 20.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 75-09-2 4-Methyi-2-pentanone (MIBK) NO uglkg 50.0 1 031101100123 108-10-1 Methyl -tent -butyl ether NO uglkg 5.0 1 ON10/10 01:23 1634-04-4 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the wntten consent of Pace Analytical Servloes, Inc r. Pace Analytical S, s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. aceAnalyf ol 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kincey Ave Suite 100 www.pareraQs.cco) Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No. 9264745 Sample: B-20 Lab ID 9264745002 Collected: 03104110 09:50 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported an a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limil OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua] 826015035A Volatile organics Analytical Method- EPA 8260 Naphthalene NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311Oil 0 01:23 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 103-65-1 Styrene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03110/10 01:23 100-42.5 1.1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 0123 630-20-6 1.1.2.2-Tetrachtoroethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene 2780 uglkg 481 100 03/10/10 15:30 127-18-4 Toluene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 0123 108-88-3 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011001:23 87-61-6 12,4-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/1001 23 120-82-1 1,1.1-Trichtoroethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 71-55-6 1,1.2-Trichtoroethane N❑ uglka 5.0 1 0311011001:23 79.00-5 Trichloroethene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1001:23 79-01-6 Trichioraflucromethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 0123 75-69-4 1,2.3-Trichloropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011001:23 96-18-4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/1011001:23 95-63-6 1,3.5-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011001.23 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate ND uglkg 50.0 1 03/10/10 01:23 108-05--4 Vinyl chloride NO uglkg 10 t 03/10110 01:23 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) NO uglkg 10 1 03110/10 61:23 1330-20.7 m&p-Xylene NO uglkg 10 1 03110/10 01:23 1330-20-7 o-Xylene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 0311Oil 0 01:23 95-47-6 ❑ibromolluaromethane (S) 119 % 79.116 1 03/10/10 01:23 1868-53-7 Toluene-d8 (S) 103 % 88-110 1 03/10/10 01:23 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluoroben2ene(S) 93 % 74-115 1 03110110 01 :23 460-00.4 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 115 % 69-121 1 03110/10 0123 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 20.7 % 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:25 S2 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 6 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced. except in full. without the written consent of Pace +Analyhcal Services, Inc. aPace Analyti cal S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ceAnapica�> 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kmcey Ave. Suite 100 www r73ce+aDs a;r. Asheville NC 28804 Huntersvdle NC 28078 (628)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project ARAMARK - GSO Pace Protect No.. 9264745 Sample! C•20 Lab ID.- 9264745003 Collected: 03/04/10 10:20 Received 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix. Solid Results reported on a "dry -weigh I" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. EPA8260 Acetone ND uglkg 83.6 1 03/10/10 01.-41 67-64-1 Benzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/1001Al 71-43-2 Bromobenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 108-86-1 Bromochlorometnane ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01 41 75.27-4 Bromoform NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 75-25.2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 8.4 1 03110/10 01:41 74-83.9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO uglkg 83.6 1 03110/10 01:41 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzerie NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01 :41 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10110 01:41 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg 8.4 1 03/10/10 01:41 75-00-3 Chloroform ND uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 67.66.3 Chloromethane ND uglkg 8.4 1 03110/10 01:41 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene ND uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND uglkg 4.2 1 0311011001:41 96-12.8 Dibromochloromethane ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 124-48.1 1,2-❑Ibromoethane(EDB) NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311 Oil 0 01 : 41 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 74-95-3 1.2-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 0 01:41 95-50-1 1,3-Diclniorobenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/1011001:41 541-73-1 1.4-Dlchiorobenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 0 01.41 106-46-7 Dichlorodifuoromethane ND uglkg 8.4 1 03/10/10 01:41 75-71-8 1.1-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10110 01:41 75.34-3 1.2-Dichioroethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 0 01:41 107-06-2 1,1-1)ichloroethene ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01.41 75-35-4 Cis-1.2-DlchIoroethene ND uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 0 01:41 156-59-2 trans-1,2-DichIoroethene N❑ uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane IN uglkg 4.2 1 03/1Oil D 01:41 78-87-5 1.3-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 142-28.9 2,2-DlChloropropane NO uglkg 4.2 1 03)1Oil 001:41 594-20-7 1. 1 -Dichloropropene ND uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 0 01:41 563-58-6 Cis-1.3-Dichtoropropene ND uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 10061-01-5 trans-1.3-Dichtoropropene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 10061-02-6 Dlisopropyl ether NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/1Oil 0 01:41 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311011001:41 100-41-4 Hexachlaro-1,3-butad iene ND uglkg 4.2 1 0311D11001:41 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 41.8 1 03/10/10 01:41 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 98.82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 99.87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 16.7 1 03/10/10 01:41 75.09-2 4•Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ND uglkg 41.8 1 03110/10 01 :41 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 1634-04-4 bate: 03122J2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written can5e}nI of�Pace +AnaIyucal Services- Inc acem Pace Analytical & r, Inc. Pace Arta lytical Services. Inc. r Analyfical 2225 Riverside ❑r. 9800 Kincey Ave. Sucre 100 www y cram Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK Pace Project No.: 9264745 - GSQ Sample: 0-20 Lab ID: 9264745003 Collected: 03/04110 1020 Received 03105/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826016035A Volatile Organic$ Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Naphthalene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 103-65-1 Styrene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 100-42-5 1.1.1,2-Tetrachioroethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311011001:41 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene NO uglkg 4,2 1 03/10/10 01;41 127-18-4 Toluene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01;41 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobe nzene N❑ uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 87-61-6 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/10 01:41 12D-82-1 1,11-Tdchloroethane NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01-41 71-55-6 1,1,2-Tdchloroethane ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10110 01:41 79-00-5 Trichloroethene NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311 Oil 01;41 79-01-6 Trichlorolluoromethene NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311011001;41 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO uglkg 4.2 1 0311Oil 001:41 96-18-4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 4.2 1 03/10110 01:41 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03110/1001:41 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate NO uglkg 41.8 1 03/10/10 01:41 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND uglkg 8A 1 03110/1001:41 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) NO uglkg 8A 1 03/10/10 01:41 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene ND uglkg 8.4 1 03/10110 01:41 1330-20-7 o-Xylene NO uglkg 4.2 1 03/10/10 01:41 9547-6 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 117 % 79-116 1 03/10/10 01:41 1868-53-7 S2 Toluene -dB (S) 101 % 88-110 1 03/10110 01:41 2037-26-5 4-BromoAuorobenzene (S) 95 °% 74-115 1 ON10/10 01:41 460-00-4 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 116 % 69-121 1 03/10/10 01:41 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 16.3 % 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:25 Date: OW22/2010 0428 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 8 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written Consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. A� f r� e Pace Analytical S I. Inc. PaceAnalyticaI Services, Inc. ceAna1Xi4Rr� 2225 Riverside Or 9800 ICincey Ave. Su to 100 WvwpDoWads_wm Asheville, NC 28804 Hunterswlle, NC 28078 (828)254.7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Protect. ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: ❑-15 Lab I0: 9264745004 Collected. 03/04/10 10:30 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Quai 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Acetone ND ugikg 97.4 1 03/10/10 01:59 67-64-1 Benzene N❑ ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 71-43-2 Bromobenzene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03J10/1001159 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane ND ugikg 4.9 1 03110/1001:59 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane NO ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 75-274 Bromoform ND ugikg 4.9 1 03110/1001:59 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND ugikg 9.7 1 0311011001:59 74-83-9 2-Butanone(MEK) ND ugikg 97.4 1 03110/10 01 .59 76-93-3 n-Butylbenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03110/10 01 :59 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01 59 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 108-90.7 Chlaroethane NO uglkg 9.7 1 03110/10 01:59 75-00-3 Chloroform ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 67.66-3 Chloromethane NO uglkg 9.7 1 03/10/10 01:59 74-87-3 2-Chloratoluene NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 95.49-8 4-Chlorotoluene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND uglkg 4.9 1 03110/10 01:59 96-12-6 Dibromochioromethane ND ugikg 4.9 1 0311N100159 124-48-1 12-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ugikg 4.9 1 03110110 01:59 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 4.9 1 03/10110 01:59 74-95-3 1 2-Dichlorobenzene NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 95-50-1 1.3-Dichlorobenzene NO ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorohenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane N❑ uglkg 9.7 1 0311011001:59 75-71-8 1.1-❑iohloroethane NO ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 75-34.3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03110110 01 :59 156-59.2 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01.59 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 78.87.5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001.59 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 594.20-7 1.1-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 49 1 03/10/10 01:59 563-58-6 cis-1,3-❑Ichloropropene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/1011001.59 10061-01-5 trans-1.3-0ich10ropropene N❑ ugikg 4.9 1 0311Oil 0 01:59 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 108.20.3 Ethylbenzene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/1001 59 100-41-4 Hexachlorc-1,3-butadlene NO ugikg 4.9 1 0311011001-59 87-68-3 2-Hexanone ND ugikg 48.7 1 03/10/10 01:59 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene {Cumene} ND ugncg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01.59 96-82.8 p-Isopropyltoluene ND ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 19.5 1 03/10/10 01:59 75-09.2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND ugikg 48.7 1 03110/10 01:59 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO ugikg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01.59 1634.04-4 Date: OT22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of 33 This report shall not be reproduces. except in full. without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc ® Pace Analytical€. s, Inc. Pace Analytical Soryle", Inc. llceAnalXical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 K;ncey Ave. Suite 100 W,N,P90waliSoo„ Asheville, NC 28804 Huntensville, NC 28078 (028)254-7176 {704}675-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: D-15 Lab ID: 9264745004 Collected. 03/04/10 10:30 Received: ONM10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260/5035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method EPA 8260 Naphthalene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 91-20-3 n-Propyibenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 103-65-1 Styrene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 100-42-5 1,1,1.2-Tetrachloroethane NO uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 630-20-6 1.1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 4.9 1 0311000 01-59 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03110/10 01:59 127-18-4 Toluene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01759 108-88-3 12,3-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO uglkg 4.9 1 03110/10 01.59 120-82-1 1,1,1-Thchioroethane ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/1001:59 71-55-6 1.1,2-Trichloroethane NO uglkg 4.9 1 03110/10 01:59 79-00-5 Trichloroethene NO uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01.59 79-01-6 Thchlorofiuoromethane ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01:59 75.69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO uglkg 4.9 1 03/1011001:59 96-18-4 12,4-Trimethylhenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03110/1001:59 95-63-6 1,3,5-Thmethylbenzene ND uglkg 4.9 1 0311011001:59 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate NO uglkg 48.7 1 03110/10 01:59 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride NO uglkg 9.7 1 03/10/10 01:59 75-01-4 xylene (Total) NO uglkg 9.7 1 03/10/10 01.59 1330-20-7 m&p-ltyiene NO uglkg 9.7 1 03/10/10 01:59 1330-20-7 o•Xylene ND uglkg 4.9 1 03/10/10 01 59 9547-6 Dibromoeuoromethane (S) 115 % 79-116 1 D3110110 01:59 1868-53-7 Toluene-d8 (S) 104 % 88-110 1 03/10/10 01:59 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 97 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 01:59 460-ODD 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 118 % 69-121 1 0300110 01:59 17060-07-0 Percent Molsture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 24.8 % 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:25 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 10 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except In full. without the written consent of Pace Anal ypcal Services, Inc.. e Pace Analytic �icea, Inc. Pace Anatyt I Services, Inc. aeeAnalytrcal 2225 Riverside Or 9800 KmceyAve. Surte 100 www p"aha co Asheville, NC 28804 Hantersvnle. NC 28078 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 Paoe Project No-: 9264745 Sample: E•33 Lab ID: 9264745005 Coilecled: 03ia4110 11:10 Received- 03105110 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 82601SO36A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. EPA8260 Acetone N❑ uglkg 784 1 03/10/10 02:17 67-64-1 Benzene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 71-43-2 Bromobenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 108-86-1 Bromochlorornethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 02:17 74.97-5 Bromodichloromethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 75-27-4 Bromolorm N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02.17 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND uglkg 7.8 1 03/10/10 02:17 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO uglkg 78.4 1 03/10/10 02:17 78-93-3 n-Butylbentene NO ugNg &9 1 03/10/10 02:17 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 135-98-8 tert-Butyl benzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ugxkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg 7.8 1 03/10110 02:17 75-00-3 Chloroform NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 67-66--3 Chloromethane ND uglkg 7.8 1 03/10/10 02-17 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02,17 95-49-8 4-Chlorotaluene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 106-43-4 12-Dibromo-3-chlor0pr0pane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 02:17 96-12-8 DibromochlDromethane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/1011002-17 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 74-95-3 1.2-❑ichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3-9 1 03/10/10 02:17 95-50-1 1,3-Dichiorobenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 0311011002:17 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 031100002:17 106-46-7 Dichlorodifiuoromethane NO uglkg 7,8 1 03/10/10 02:17 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane NO ugAg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 75.34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO ug/kg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 107-06-2 1,1-Dichioroethene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 02:17 156-59-2 tracts-1,2-DichWoe thene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 02:17 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 19 1 03/10/10 02:17 142-28-9 2,2-Dichlaropropane ND ug/kg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02.17 594-20-7 1.1-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311Of1002:17 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 19 1 ON1Of1002:17 10061-01-5 trains -1,3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311011002.17 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 108-20-3 Ethyibenzene NO uglkg 19 1 03/10/10 02:17 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene NO uglkg 19 1 03/10/10 02:17 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 39.2 1 03/10/10 02:17 591-78-6 1 sopropyl benzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 98-82-8 p-i'sopropyltoluene NO uglkg 19 1 03/10/10 02:17 W87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 15.7 1 03/10/10 02:17 75-09-2 4-Metht yl-2-pentanone (W13K) NO uglkg 39.2 1 03/10/10 0217 108-10-1 M ethyl -tert-butyl ether ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 02:17 1634-04-4 Dale: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in Full without the written consent of PP.ace Analytical Services- Inc. Pace Analytic vices, Inc. Pace Anaiyti•caI Sery lees. Inc- acQmaivical . 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100 www pacVdbs Qom Asheville, INC 28804 Huntemv lle. NC 281378 (828)254-7176 (704)675-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GS0 Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: E•33 Lab 10: 9264745005 Collected. 03/04/10 11:10 Received: 03/05110 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit ❑F Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260r5036A Volatile organics Analytical Method: EPA8260 Naphthalene ND uglkg n-Propylbenzene N❑ uglkg Styrene ND uglkg 1.1.1.2-Tetra chloroethane N❑ uglkg 1.1.2.2- Tetra chloroethane ND uglkg Tetra chloroethene ND uglkg Toluene ND uglkg 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 1.2,4-TrlChlorobenzene ND uglkg 1.1,1-Tn010roethane ND uglkg 1.12-Trichloroethane ND uglkg Trichloroethene ND uglkg TrlChlorofluoromelhane ND uglkg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND uglkg 1.2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 1-3,5•Tnmet hyIbenzene ND uglkg Vinyl acetate ND ug1Ng Vinyl chlonde ND uglkg Xylene (Total) ND uglNg m&p-Xylene ND uglkg o-Xylene ND uglkg Dibromofluoromethane (S) 100 % Toluene-d8 (S) 102 % 443romafluorobenzene (S) 96 % 1,2-Dichlaroethane-d4 (S) 100 °% Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 6.8 % Date: 03/22/2010 04-28 PM 3.9 1 3.9 1 3-9 1 3.9 1 3-9 1 3.9 1 3-9 1 3-9 1 3,9 1 3-9 1 3,9 1 3-9 1 3.9 1 3.9 1 3.9 1 3.9 1 39.2 1 7.8 1 7.8 1 7.8 1 3.9 1 79-116 1 88-110 1 74-115 t 69-121 1 0-10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced. except in full without the written consent of Pace Analytical Servzes, Inc 03110/1002-17 91-20-3 03110110 02:17 103-65-1 03/10/10 02-17 100-42.5 03/10/10 0217 630-20-6 03/10/10 02-17 79.34.5 03110/10 02-17 127-18-4 03110/10 02717 108-88-3 03110/10 02-17 87.61-6 03/10/10 02:17 120-82-1 03/10/10 02.17 71-55-6 03/10/10 02.17 79-00-5 03110110 0217 79-01.6 03110110 02:17 75-69-4 03/10/10 02:17 96.18-4 03/10/10 02:17 95-63-6 03/10/10 02:17 108-67.8 0311Oil 0 02:17 108-05-4 03/10110 02:17 75-01.4 03/10/10 02:17 1330-20-7 03110/10 02-17 1330-20-7 03110/10 02:17 95-47-6 03110/10 02:17 1868-53-7 03110/10 02.17 2037-26-5 03/10110 02:17 460-00-4 03/10/10 02:17 17060-07-0 03/08/10 1530 Page 12 of 33 e Pace Analytic_. _.. vices. Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. MAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. suite 100 wwwpacebbs coo Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 i704y875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.- 9264745 Sample: F-5 Lab ID: 9264745006 Collected. 031D4/10 11:35 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Acetone N❑ uglkg 104 1 03/10/10 02:36 67-64-1 Benzene N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 71-43-2 Bromobenzene NO ugikg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane N❑ uglkg 52 1 03/10/10 02:36 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10110 02:36 75-27-4 Bromoform ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND uglkg 10.4 1 03/10/10 02:36 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) ND uglkg 104 1 03/10/10 0236 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 104-51-8 sec-Butyibenzene NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 135-98-8 tart-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 6.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02736 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND uglkg 10.4 1 03110/1 D 02:36 75-00-3 Chloroform NO uglkg 52 1 03/10/10 02.36 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND uglkg 10.4 1 03/10/10 02:36 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 0216 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 96-12-8 Dibromochloramethane NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10110 02:36 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 106-93-4 Dibromomethane N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 74-95-3 12-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03110/1002:36 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/1002-36 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/kg 10.4 1 03/10/10 0236 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/70/10 02:36 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ugAg 5.2 1 0311 Oil 0236 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 75-35-4 cis-1,2-0ichloroethene N❑ ug/kg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichlaroethene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02.36 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/1011002:36 78-07-5 1,3-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 5.2 1 0311011002:36 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 5.2 1 =10110 02:36 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene N❑ uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 563-58-6 cis-1.3•Dichioropropene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/1011002:36 10061-01-5 trans- l,3-Di chi orop ropene ND uglkg 5.2 1 0311011002-36 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether ND ug/kg 5.2 1 03/10110 02:36 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10110 02:36 1OD-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butediene ND uglkg 52 1 03/10/10 02:36 87-68-3 2-Hexanone ND uglkg 51.8 1 03/10/10 02:36 591-78-6 lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02,36 98-82.8 p-Isopropyltoluene ND uglkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride ND uglkg 20.7 1 03/10/10 02.36 75-09-2 4-Methyl -2 -pe nta n o ne (MIBK) ND uglkg 51.8 1 03/10/10 02:36 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/kg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 1634-04-4 Date: 03122/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 13 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except o full, without the written consent of�Pace -.Analytical Services, Inc. x Pace Analytic lice$, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kmcey Ave. Suite 100 Para�s corn Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville. NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No : 9284745 Sample: F-5 LabID: 9264745006 Collected: 03/04/10 11:35 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Saud Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. 4ual 826D15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. EPA8260 Naphthalene N❑ ugrkg 5.2 1 0311011002:36 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene Nd ugrkg 6.2 1 03110/1002:36 103-65-1 Styrene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 100-42.5 1.1.1.2-Tetrachi oroethane NO ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 630-20-6 1.1.2,2-Tetrachi oroethane ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03110/10 02:36 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene N❑ ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 127-18-4 Toluene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:35 108-88-3 1.23-Trichtorobenzene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 0311011002.36 87-61-6 12,4-Trichlorobenzerie ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 0216 120-82.1 1.1.1-Trichloroethane NO ugrkg 52 1 03110/10 02:36 71-56-6 11.2-Trichloroethane NO ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 79-OD-5 Trichloroethene NO ugrkg 5.2 1 0311011002:36 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane N❑ ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02:36 75.69-4 1,2.3-Trichloropropane NID ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02 36 96-18-4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/1Oil 0 02:36 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02 36 108.67.8 Vinyl acetate NO ugrkg 51.8 1 03/10/10 02:36 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND ugrkg 10.4 1 03/10/10 02:36 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) ND ugrkg 10.4 1 03/1Oil 0 02 36 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene N❑ ugrkg 10.4 1 03/10/10 02:36 1330-20-7 o-Xylene ND ugrkg 5.2 1 03/10/10 02,36 95-47-6 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 118 % 79.116 1 03/10110 02:36 1868-53.7 53 Toluene-d8 (5) 102 °% 88-110 1 03/10/10 02.36 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 96 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 02.36 460-00-4 12.DrChloroethane-d4 (S) 117 °% 69-121 1 03/10/10 02,36 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 25.2 °% 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:31 Date 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 14 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc n 7` ❑ �n j �; Pace Analytic rites, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. U' {ieAnayica1 2225 Riversiee Or 9800 Kincey Ave Surte 100 WWW pacWans.coin Asheville_ NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28076 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project. ARAMARK - GSd (828)254-7176 Pace Project No 9264745 Sample: G-20 Lab ID: 9264745007 Collected: 03104/10 12:40 Received: 03/05110 16:33 Matnx Solid Results reported on a "dry. weight" basis (704)875-9092 Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Acelone 78.5 uglkg 76.1 1 03/10/10 02:54 67-64.1 Benzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/1Of10 02:54 71-43-2 Bromobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 74.97-5 Bramodichloromethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 75-27-4 Bromoform NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02 54 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 7-6 1 03/10/10 02:54 74-83-9 2-Sutanone (MEK) NO uglkg 76.1 1 03/10/10 02 54 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg 7.6 1 03/10/10 02:54 75.00-3 Chloroform NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 67-66-3 Chloromethane NO uglkg 76 1 03/10/10 02:54 74.87.3 2-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 Oaf 1Of1002.54 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane NO uglkg 38 1 03/10/10 02:54 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDBy NO uglkg 3.8 1 0311011002.54 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 541-73.1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane NO uglkg 7.6 1 0311011002:54 75.71.8 11-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1002:54 75-34-3 1,2-❑ichloroethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 107.06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.8 uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4300 uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/100254 156.59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 22.6 uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/1Oil 0 02.54 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 142.28-9 2.2-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 563-58-6 cis-1.3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 10061-01-5 trans-1.3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 10061.02.6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311011002:54 100.41-4 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 87-68-3 2-Hexanone ND uglkg 38.0 1 03)10/10 02:54 591-7M lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 98-82.8 p-Isopropyltoluene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03)10110 02 : 54 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 152 1 03/10/10 02:54 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) N❑ uglkg 38.0 1 03/10/10 02 54 108-10.1 Methyl -lent -butyl ether NO uglkg 38 1 03110110 02.54 1634-04-4 Clual C9 E Dale: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 15 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the wrrtten consent of Pace Analytir„aI Services. Inc.. e PaceAnalytie lees, Inc. Pace Analytical services, Inc. IANA2 aceAnaly ica! 2225 Riverside 9800 Kinsey Ave Suite 100 www.µyoela7s.ccvn Asheville, NG 28804 Huntersvdle. NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No. 9264745 Sample: G-20 Lab 10: 9264745007 Collected: 031041lO 12:40 Received: 03105110 16:33 Matrix. Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters RESLIItS Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Naphthaiene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 103-65-1 Styrene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 100.42-5 1,1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 02:54 630-20-6 1.1.2.2•Tetra chloroe thane ND ugfkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene 17400 uglkg 9800 2500 03/10/10 13:29 127.18-4 Toluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 108-88-3 1,2.3-Tnchlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 87-61.6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1002:54 120-82-1 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane ND uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1002:54 71-55-6 1.1.2-Trichtoroe thane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 79-00-5 Tnchloroethene ND uglkg 9800 2500 03110/1013:29 79-01.6 Trichlorofluoromethane NO ug*g 3.8 1 03/10/10 02.54 75-69-4 1,2,3-Tnchloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 0311 Oil 02:54 96-18-4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1002:54 95-63-6 1,3.5-Tnmethylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate NO uglkg 38.0 1 03/10/10 02:54 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride 15.3 uglkg 7.6 1 03/16/10 02:54 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) Nfl uglkg 7.6 1 03/10/10 02:54 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene NO uglkg 7.6 1 03/10/10 6Z:54 1330-20-7 ❑-Xylene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 02:54 95-47.6 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 106 % 79-116 1 03110/10 02:54 1868-53-7 Toluene-dS (S) 97 % 88.110 1 03110/10 02:54 2037-26-5 4-Bromafluorobenzene (S) 92 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 02:54 460-00-4 1,2-Dlchlorcethane-d4(S) 118 % 69.121 1 0311Oil 002:54 17060.07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 13.9 % 010 1 03108/10 15:31 Date: 03/22J2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except rn Full, without the written consent of Pace An aIyLcaI Services. Inc Page 16 of 33 �. Pace AvaIytici does, $nc. Poce Analytical Services. Inc. aceAnalyfieal 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 WW.V Pscelaba C0M Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville. NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No : 9264745 Sample: H-15 Lab ID: 9264745008 Callecled: 03/04i10 13,05 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA8260 Acetone ND uglkg 77.6 1 03/10/10 03:12 67-64-1 Benzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 7143.2 Bromobenzene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 OW10110 03:12 75-27-4 Bromoform NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03.12 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO uglkg T8 1 03/10/10 03:12 74.83.9 2-Butanone(MEK) NO uglkg 77.6 1 0311Oil 003:12 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10110 D3:12 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03.12 135-98-8 ten -Butyl benzene NO ug/kg 3.9 1 03/10/10 0112 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 0112 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND uglkg 7.8 1 03/10/10 0112 75-00-3 Chtoroform ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND uglkg T8 1 03/10110 03:12 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 D311011003:12 96-12-8 Dibromochloramethane N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 124-48-1 1.2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 106-934 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 0311011003-12 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 031101100312 541-73-1 1,4-Dt'chlorobenzerie ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 106-46-7 DichlorodiRuoromethane NO uglkg 7.8 1 03/10/10 03:12 75.71-8 1.1-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/1011003:12 107-06-2 1.1-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 3.9 1 0311Oil 003:12 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 16.4 ug/kg 3.9 1 0311Oil 00112 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 03: 12 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311Oil 003:12 78-87.5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 142-28-9 2.2-Dichioropropane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 594-20.7 1,1-Dichioropropene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 0311011003:12 563-58-6 cis -1,3-Di chi o rop ropene ND ug*g 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 10061-01-5 trans-1.3-❑ichtoropropene N❑ uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 108-20-3 Eltiylbenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 1OD-41.4 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene NO ug/kg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 38.8 1 03/10/10 03:12 591-78-6 1 sop ropyl benzene (Cumene) ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03.12 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 15.5 1 03/10110 03.12 75-09-2 4-Methyt-2-pentanone {MIRK} ND uglkg 38.8 1 031101100112 108-10-1 M ethyl -tert-butyl ether ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311 Oil 03:12 1634-04-4 Date: 0312212010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 17 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written oonsent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Artalytic rites, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Ine. ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Or 9800 Itincey Ave. Suite top xxr.asca+aesxvn Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 [828j254.7176 [704]875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Protect: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: H-15 Lab ID: 9264745008 Collected: 031041t0 13:05 Received: 03105/10 16:33 Matrix. Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Para,^:eters Results Emits Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. EPA8260 Napnthalene ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311011003,12 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/1003 12 103-65-1 Styrene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03110/100112 100.42-5 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311011003:12 630.20-6 1.1,2.2-Tetra chloroethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 031101100112 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene 2460 uglkg 434 100 03/10/10 13:48 127-18-4 Toluene IN uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 108.88-3 1,2.3-Tnchlorobenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 0311011003:12 87-61-6 1,2.4-Thchlorobenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 031101100312 120-82-1 1.1.1-Thchloroethane IN uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03.12 71-55-5 1.1.2-Thchloroethare ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 79-00-5 Trichloroethene 6.8 uglkg 3.9 1 03/10110 03:12 79-01.6 Trichlorofluoromethane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03.12 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 03:12 96-18-4 1,2.4-Trimethytbenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03110/10 03.12 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate ND uglkg 38.8 1 03/1Oil 0 03 12 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND uglkg 7.8 1 =10110 0312 75.01.4 Xylene (Total) ND uglkg 78 1 03/10/10 03:12 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene ND uglkg 7.8 1 03/10110 03:12 1330-20-7 o-Xylene ND uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 03:12 95-47.6 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 106 % 79-116 1 03/10/10 0112 1868-53-7 Toluene -dB (S) 102 % 88-110 1 03/10/10 03:12 2037.26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 92 % 74-115 1 03110/10 0112 460-00-4 1,2-Oicnloroethane-iJ4 {S) 117 % 69.121 1 03/10/10 03:12 17060-07-0 Percent }Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 8.6 % 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:31 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 18 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written con sent off Pace +Anal ytieal Services, Inc. 1 eb aceAnalylical �* 'umlabs com Project ARAMARK - GSO Pace Ana lytici •ices, Inc. 2225 Riverside Dr Asheville. NC 28804 (828)254-7175 ANALYTICAL. RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kinsey Ave. Suile 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: 1-15 Lab ID: 9264745009 Collected: 03/04/10 13 30 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix Solid Results reported on a "dryweight" basis (704)e75-9092 Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260/5035A Volatile Organics Ana lylicaI Method: EPA8260 Acetone N❑ uglkg 99.7 1 0311011012:35 67-64.1 Benzene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1012:35 7143.2 Bromobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1012:35 108-86-1 Bromochioromethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1012:35 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane IN uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 75-27-4 Brornoform ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12 35 75-25.2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 12:35 74-83.9 2-Butanone (MEK) ND uglkg 99.7 1 03/10/10 12:35 78-93.3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 5.0 1 03110/10 12:35 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12.35 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 1215 75-00-3 Chloroform ND uglkg 5.0 1 03110/10 12:35 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND uglkg 10 1 03/10/10 12:35 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12735 95-49-8 4-Chlorololuene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12235 106.43-4 1,2-Dibroma-3-01oropropane ND uglkg 5.0 1 03110/1012:35 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 106-93-4 Dibromomethane NO uglkg 5.0 1 0300110 12,35 74.95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03f 10110 lZ35 95-50-1 1.3-Dichlorobenzene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane NO uglkg 10 1 0311011012:35 75-71-8 1,1-Dichioroethane ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ugAg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 107-06-2 1.1-Dichlaroethene ND ugtkg 5.0 1 03/1011012:35 75-35-4 cis-1,2-DichIoroethene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/1011012:35 156-59-2 trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene NO ugtkg 50 1 0311011012:35 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03)1Oil 012:35 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12 35 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 563-58-6 cis -1,3-Dichloropropene N❑ uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012.35 10061-01.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311011012:35 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 108.20.3 Ethylbenzene NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 100-41 4 Hexachlora-1,3-butadiene ND uglkg 5.0 1 03/1011012:35 87-68-3 2-Hexanone ND uglkg 49.8 1 03/10/10 12:35 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12:35 98-82-8 p-lsopropyltoluene NO uglkg 5.0 1 0311Of10 12:35 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 19.9 1 03/10/10 12 35 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NO uglkg 49.8 1 03/10/10 12:35 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO uglkg 5.0 1 03/10/10 12.35 1634.04.4 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 19 of 33 This report shad not be reproduced. except in full, without the written consent of Paycee+AnalyticaI Services. Inc. ! I iac e Pace Analytica ices, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Ce�l1 yN 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 KarwpeCe4b3mm Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersvllle, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)575-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Protect: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: 1-15 Lab 10: 9264745009 Collected: 03/04/10 13:30 Received: 03105M0 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua! 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Naphthalene ND uglkg n-Propylbenzene ND uglkg Styrene ND uglkg 1.1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg Tetrachlorcethene 14.0 ugAg Toluene N❑ uglkg 1,2,3-Tnchlorobenzene ND ugtkg 1,2,4-Thchtorobenzene ND uglkg 1.1,1-Trichloroethane. NO uglkg I.1,2-Trichloroethane NO uglkg Trichloroethene N❑ uglkg Trichloroiluoromethane ND uglkg 1,2,3-Trichioropropene ND uglkg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 1,35-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg Vinyl acetate ND uglkg Vinyl chlonde N❑ uglkg Xylene (Total) ND ugtkg m&p-Xylene ND uglkg o-Xylene ND ug*g Dibromofluoromethane (S) 103 % Toluene-d8 (S) 103 % 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 96 °% 12-Dichioroethane-d4 (S) 119 % Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 25.8 % Date: 03122/2010 0428 PM 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5,0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 &0 1 &0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 &0 1 49.8 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 5.0 1 79-116 1 88-110 1 74-115 1 69-121 1 0,10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 03/10/10 12:35 91-20-3 03/10/10 12:35 103-65-1 03110 / 10 12:35 100-42-5 03110/i012:35 630-2" 03/10/1012:35 79-34-5 0 3 / 10110 12: 35 12 7-18-4 0 3110110 12:35 108- 88-3 =10/101235 87-61-6 03/10/10 12:35 120-82-1 03/10/1012:35 71-55-6 03/1011012:35 79.00-5 03/10/10 12:35 79-01-6 0311011012:35 75-69-4 03/10/10 12 35 96-18-4 03110/1012:35 95-63-6 03110110 12' 35 10 8-67-8 03/10/10 12:35 1 M05-4 0311011012:35 75-01-4 03110110 12:35 1330-20 -7 03/10/10 12: 35 1330-2 0-7 0311011012:35 95-47-6 03110110 12:35 1868- 5 3-7 03110/1012.35 2037-26-5 03/101101215 460-00-4 03/10/10 1235 17 06 0-07- 0 109RI1;M[Ix&k1l Page 20 of 33 f Pace Analytical S s, Inc. - aceAnaly6ol 2225 Riverside 4r. ucam Asheville, NC 28804 (828)254-7176 ANALYTICAL RESULTS PaCe Analytical Sorvices, Inc. 9Sd0 Kincey Ave Suite 100 Hunsersville NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 Sample: J-5 Lab!D: 9264745010 Collected: 03/04/10 13:45 Received: 03/05110 16:33 Matrix- Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Dual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Acetone 191 uglkg 76.6 1 0311011012:53 67-64-1 C9 Benzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 71-43.2 Bromobenzene NO uglkg 3.9 1 03/10/10 12:53 108-86.1 Brornochloramethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 74-97-5 Bromodichloromelhane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 75.27.4 Bromoform NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12 53 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO uglkg 7.7 1 03M0110 12:53 74-83.9 2-Butanone (MEK) ND uglkg 766 1 03/10/10 12:53 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 i2:53 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 135.98-8 tent-Butylbenzene NO ugAg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12.53 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene N❑ uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 12:53 1 08-90-7 Chloraethane ND uglkg 7.7 1 03110/10 12.53 75-00-3 Chloroform NO ugNg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 67-66.3 Chloromethane NO uglkg 7.7 1 03/10/10 12:53 74-87-3 2-ChlOrotoluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 95-49-8 4-Chiorotoluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 106-43-4 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 96-12.8 Dibromochloromethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 124-48-1 1.2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 106-93-4 ❑ibromomethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 0300110 12:53 74-95-3 1.2-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110110 12:53 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 541-73-1 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene NO ugn(g 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 105-46-7 ❑ichlorodifluorometnane NO uglkg 7.7 1 03/10/10 12:53 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane NO uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO ugrkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 75-35-4 cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.6 1 03/10/10 12:53 156-59-2 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 156-60-5 1,2-❑ichloropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 0311011 D 12:53 78-87-5 1.3-Dichioropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 142-28-9 2.2-Dichioropropane NO uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12 53 594-20-7 1.1-DION oropropene N❑ uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1012,53 563-58-6 cis-1.3-Dichloropropene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03110/10 12:53 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloroprope ne ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/1012:53 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 3.8 1 03)10/10 12:53 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 100-41-4 Hexachloro-l.3-butadiene ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 87.68-3 2-Hexanone NO uglkg 38.3 1 03/10110 12:53 591-78.6 lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene NO uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 99-87-6 Methylene Chloride NO uglkg 15.3 1 03/10/10 12:53 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NO uglkg 38.3 1 03/10/10 12:53 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 1634.04-4 Date. 03/2212010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 21 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced. exCept in full without the written consent of PPaaycee+Analytical Services. Inc t Pace Analytical S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. /9�7 aeeAnalyrcal 2225 Riverside ❑r 9804 Kinsey Ave Suite 100 W,*P"Iabg Corr Asheville, NC 25804 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.. 9264745 Sample: J-5 Lab Io: 9264745010 Collected: 03/04/10 13:45 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matnx Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. ❑ual 8260/5035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method. E PA 8260 Naphthalene N❑ uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 91-20.3 n-Propylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 103.65-1 Styrene ND uglkg 3-8 1 03/10/10 12:53 100-42-5 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 3-8 1 03/10/10 12:53 630-20-6 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 3-8 1 03/10/10 12:53 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene 13.9 uglkg 3-8 1 03/10/10 12:53 127-18-4 Toluene ND ugAg 3-8 1 03/10/10 12 53 108.88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND uglkg 3-8 1 0311011012:53 87-61-6 1,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene ND uglkg 3-8 1 03110/1012:53 120.82-1 1,1,1-Triehloroethane ND uglkg 3.8 1 03110/1012:53 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND uglkg 3-8 1 03110110 12:53 79-00-5 Trichloroethene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 12.53 79-01-6 Tdchlorofluoromethane ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10/10 12:53 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trlchloropropane ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012:53 96-18-4 1,2,4-Tnme1hylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 03/10110 12:53 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311011012'53 108-67.8 Vinyl acetate ND uglkg 38-3 1 03/10/10 12:53 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND uglkg 7.7 1 03/10/10 12:53 75-01.4 Xylene (Total) ND uglkg 7.7 1 03/10/10 12:53 1330-20-7 m&p-Xyiene N❑ uglkg 7.7 1 03/1011012:53 1330-20-7 o-Xylene ND uglkg 3.8 1 0311000 12:53 95-47.5 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 108 % 79-116 1 03/10110 12:53 1868-53-7 Toluene-d8 (S) 103 % 88-110 1 03/10/10 12:53 2037-26-5 4.8romofluorobenzene (S) 93 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 12:53 460-00-4 1,2-Dlchloroethane-d4 (S) 126 % 69-121 1 0311011012:53 17060-07.0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 14.7 % 0.10 1 03/08110 15 32 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 22 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written c-0nsent of Pace +Ana Iytical Services, Inc. 1 1'vb r. ./0;? ace Analytical . * paoviSD6 cum Pace Analytical 5 s, Inc. 2225 Riverside Dr Asheville. NC 28804 ANALYTICAL RESULTS (828)254.7176 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 xincey Ave Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)87"092 Project. ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.'. 9264745 Sample: K-5 Lab 11): 9264745041 Collected: 03/04110 14:05 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dryweight" basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260 Acetone NO ugrkg 74.1 1 03/10/10 05:56 67-64-1 Benzene N❑ uglkg 3.7 1 03)1Oil 0 05:56 71-43-2 Bromobenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 0311Oil 0 0&56 108.86-1 Bromochloromethane NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 75.27-4 Bromoform NO ugrkg 3.7 1 0300110 05:56 75-25-2 Bromamethane ND ugrkg 7.4 1 03110110 05:56 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO uglkg 74.1 1 03/10/10 05:56 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene 10.8 ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 104-51.8 sec-Butyibenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05.56 135.98.8 tert-Sutylbenzene IN ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride NO uglkg 3,7 1 03/10/10 05 56 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 108-90.7 Chloroethane NO ugrkg 7.4 1 03110/1005:56 75-00-3 Chloroform NO uglkg 3.7 1 031l 0/10 05.56 67-66-3 Chloromethane NO ugrkg 7.4 1 03110/1005.56 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 0311011005:56 95-49-8 4-Chiorotoluene NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311011005:56 106-43-4 1.2-❑ibromo-3-chloropropane NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/1005:56 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 124-48-1 1.2-Dlbrornoethane(EDB) ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03110/1005:56 106-93-4 Dlbromomethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 74-95-3 1.2-Lhchlorobenzene ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 95-50-1 1.3-Dlchlorobenzene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03110/1005:56 541-73.1 14-❑ichlorobenzene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03110/100556 106-46-7 Dichlorodill uoromathane NO ugrkg 7A 1 0311011005:56 75-71-8 1,1-Dlchlorcethane NO ugrkg 3.7 1 0311011005:56 75-34-3 1.2-Dlchloroethane ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03/1011005:56 107-06-2 1,1-Dlchloroethene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03110/10 05:56 75-35-4 cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 14.3 uglkg 3.7 1 03110/10 05:56 156-59-2 trans -1.2-Dlchi oroethene ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10110 05 56 156-60-5 1,2-Dlchloropropane ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10110 05:56 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 142.28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05.56 594-20-7 1,1-Dlchloropropene N❑ ugrkg 3.7 1 0311011005.56 563-58-6 cis- 1.3-Dichloropropene ND ugrkg 3.7 1 0311011005:56 10061-01-5 trans-i,3-Dirhloropropene NO uglkg 3.7 1 0311011005:56 10061-02-6 Diisopropyl ether NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 108-20-3 Ethylbenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/1011005:56 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene NO ugrkg 3.7 1 03110/1005:56 87-68-3 2-Hexanone NO ugrkg 37.1 1 03/10110 05.56 591-78-6 Isopropyibenzene (Cumene) NO uglkg 3.7 1 03110/10 05:56 98-82-8 p-isopropyltoiuene 31.1 ugrkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 99-87-6 Methylene Chlonde ND uglkg 14.8 1 03/10/10 05:56 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) ND uglkg 37.1 03/10/10 05 56 108-10-1 Methyl -tent -butyl ether NO uglkg 3.7 i 03/10/10 05:56 1634-044 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LA$ORATORY ANALYSIS Page 23 of 33 This repart shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the wntten consent of PPaac�e+A na l ytical Services. Inc 1 R,a[iL •, r Pace Analytical S i, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Or 9600 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 WWW poceMbs<x= AsheWlle. NC 28804 Huntersville. NC 28078 (826)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Protect: ARAMARK - GSQ Pace Project No.. 9264745 Sample: K-5 Lab ID: 9264745011 Collected: 0310400 14:05 Received: 03/05110 16:33 Matnx. Solid Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis Parameters ReSuIIS Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 826015035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA8260 Naphthalene 5.3 uglkg 3.7 1 03/10110 05:56 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:55 103-65.1 Styrene ND uglkg 3,7 1 0311Oil 0 05:56 100-42-5 1.1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10110 05:56 630-20.6 1.1.2.2-Tetrachi oroethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05 56 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene N❑ uglkg 3.7 1 03/1 Oil 05:56 127.18-4 Toluene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trich Iorobenzene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05 56 87.61-6 12,4-Trichlorobenzene NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 120-82-1 1.1,1-Trichloroethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05.56 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05 56 79-00-5 Trichloroethene ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane ND uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trich Ioropropane N0 uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05 56 96.18-4 1,244-Trimethylbenzene 23.7 uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05.56 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.3 uglkg 3.7 1 03/10/10 05:56 108.67-8 Vinyl acetate ND uglkg 37.1 1 ON1Oil 0 05:56 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND uglkg 74 1 03/10110 05:56 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) ND uglkg 7.4 1 03/10110 05:56 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene ND uglkg 74 1 03)10/10 05:56 1330-20-7 a-xyiene NO uglkg 3 7 1 03/10/10 05.56 95-47-6 Dibromofluoromethane (S) 96 % 79.116 1 03/10/10 05:56 1868.53-7 Toluene-d8 (S) 101 % 88-110 1 03/10/10 05:56 2037.26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 91 % 74-115 1 03/10/10 05:56 460-00-4 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 91 % 69-121 1 03/10/10 05:56 17060.07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974.87 Percent Moisture 13.0 % 0.10 1 03/08/10 15:32 Date 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in roll, without the wntten consent off Pace eerAnalyfical Services. Inc. fi ela Page 24 of 33 m Pace Analytical 5 s, Inc. Pace Analytcal Services, Inc - ace Analj&al 2225 Riverside Or. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite '100 Ww,scGM Asheville, NG 28804 Huntersville, INC 28078 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 (828)254-7175 QC Batch: MSV110233 Analysis Method. EPA 8260 GC Batch Method. EPA 8260 Analysis Description: 8260 MSV 5035A Volatile Organics Associated Lab Samples: 9264745001, 9264745002, 9264745003, 9264745004, 9264745005, 9264745006. 9264745007. 9264745008, 9264745009,9264745010,9264745011 METHOD BLANK: 412474 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 9264745001, 9264745002, 9264745003, 9264745004, 9264745005, 9264745006, 9264745007, 926474500B, 9264745009.9264745010.9264745011 Blank Reporting Parameter unrts Resuil Limit Analyzed Qualifiers 1,1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane uglkg N❑ 5.0 03109/1022:57 1,1.1-Thchloroethane uglkg N❑ &0 03/0911022:57 1,1.2,2-Tetrachlaroethane uglkg N❑ 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 1,1,2-Trichloroethane uglkg ND 5.0 03IM10 22:57 1,1-Dichloroethene uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 1,1-Dichloroethene uglkg Na 5.0 0310911022Z7 1,1-Dichloropropene uglkg NO 5.0 OM911022*57 1,2,3-Trichlorobertzene uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/1022:57 1,2,3-Trichloropropane uglkg ND 5.0 03/0911022:57 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene uglkg NO 5.0 0310911022:57 1,24-Trimethylbenzene uglkg ND 5.0 0310911022:57 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane uglkg N❑ 5.0 03/0911022:57 1,2-❑ibromoethane(EDB) uglkg ND 5.0 0310911022:57 1,2-Dichlorobenzene uglkg N❑ 5.0 03/09/1022:67 1,2-Dichloroethane uglkg N❑ 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 1,2-Dichloropropane uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 143,5-Thmethylbenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03109/10 22:57 1,3-Dichlorobenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 1,3-Dichloropropane ugAg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 1,4-Dichlorobenzene uglkg ND 5.0 03109/1022:57 2,2-Dichloropropane uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 2-Butanone (MEK) uglkg ND 100 03ID9110 22:57 2-Chlorotoluene uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 2Z:57 2-Hexanone uglkg ND 50.0 03109M0 22:57 4-Chlorotoluene uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22'57 4-Methyl -2-pentanone (MIBK) uglkg ND 50.0 03/09/10 22:57 Acetone uglkg ND 100 03/09/10 22:57 Benzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 2Z57 Bromoberizene ug/kg ND 5.0 03109/11)22:57 Bromochloromethane uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Bromodichloromethane uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Bromofonn uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Bromomethane uglkg N❑ 10.0 03/09/10 22:57 Carbon tetrachloride uglkg ND 5.0 03109110 22:57 Chlorobenzene uglkg ND 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Chloroethane uglkg ND 10.0 03/09/10 22:57 Chloroform uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Chloromethane uglkg ND 10.0 03/09/10 22:57 cis- 1,2•Dichloroethene uglkg ND 5.0 03/0911022:57 cis- 1.3-Dictltoropropene uglkg ND 5,0 03/09110 22:57 Dibromachloromethane uglkg ND &0 03/09110 22:57 Date: 03122/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in Full, without the written con sent �of Pace McIybcal Services, Inc. t704y875-9092 Page 25 of 33 e Pace Analytical S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 1D4 Wµ PaCff4 sC4M Asheville. NC 28804 Hunter5v1lle, NC 28078 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 (e28)254-7176 METHOD BLANK- 412474 Associated Lab Samples: Parameter Matrix: Solid 9264745001, 9264745002, 9264745003, 92647450N. 9264745005. 9264745006 9264745009.9264745010.9264745011 Blank Reporting Units Result Limit Analyzed Dtbromomethane uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Dichtorodifluoromethane uglkg NO 10.0 =09110 22:57 Diisopropyl ether uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Ethytbenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22 57 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene u91k9 N❑ 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 tsopropyibenzene (Cumene) uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 m&p-Xylene uglkg NO 10.0 03/09/10 22:57 Methyl-tert-butyl ether uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Methylene Chlofide uglkg NO 20.0 03/09/10 22:57 n-Butylbenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 n-Propylbenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Naphthalene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 o-Xylene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 p-Isopropyltoluene uglkg NO 5.0 031OW10 22:57 sac-Butylbenzene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Styrene uglkg ND 5.0 03109/10 22:57 tert-Butyl benzene uglkg ND 5.0 0310911 D 22:57 Tevachloroethene uglkg NO 5.0 03109/1022:57 Toluene uglkg NO 5.0 03109111)2Z57 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene uglkg NO 5.0 0310911022:57 tra ns- 1. 3-Di chloropropene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Tnchtoroethene uglkg NO 5.0 03/09/10 22:57 Trichlorofluoromethane uglkg NO 5.0 03/09110 22.57 Vinyl acetate uglkg NO 50.0 031D9110 22:57 Vinyl chloride uglkg NO 10.0 03/09/10 2Z57 Xylene (Total) uglkg ND 10.0 031D9110 2217 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 106 69-121 03109/10 22:57 4•Bramofluorobenzene (S) % 97 74-115 03/09/10 22:57 Dibromofluoromethane (S) % 109 79.116 03/09/10 22:57 Toluene-d8 (S) % 103 88-110 03/09/10 22:57 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 412475 9264745007.9264745008. Quallfiers Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane uglkg 50 53.7 107 75-137 1,1,1-Trichloroetharte uglkg 50 59.3 119 70-140 1.1.2.2•Tetrachloroethane uglkg 50 49.9 100 74-133 1,1,2-Trichloroethane uglkg 50 55.3 113 79-129 1,1-Dichloroethane uglkg 50 57.4 115 72-139 1.1-Dichloroethene uglkg 50 55.4 111 69-154 1,1-Dichloropropene uglkg 5D 53.3 107 74-138 1,2.3-Trichlorobenzene uglkg 50 48.6 97 71-150 1,2,3-Trichloropropane uglkg 50 53.6 107 74-135 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene uglkg 50 46.2 92 68-150 (704)875-9092 Date: 03/22/2010 04-28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 26 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of PPaac�e+Analytical Services, Inc. 1 f�lf✓.. e Pace Analytical S s. Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. aeeAnaly�ical 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Wwwwafabsmm Asheville, NC 29804 Huniersville. NC 2$078 (828)254-7178 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: ARAMARK - GSO Paoe Project No.: 9264745 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE- 412475 Parameter Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS % Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene uglkg 50 53.4 107 70-130 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane uglkg 50 52.6 105 65-146 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) uglkg 50 52.1 104 77-136 1,2-Dichlorobenzene uglkg 50 51.5 103 75-141 1,2-Dichloroethane uglkg 50 60A 121 74-134 1,2-Dichioropropane uglkg 50 56.5 113 77-138 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene uglkg 50 52.8 106 65-128 1,3-Dichloco benzene uglkg 50 50.0 100 76-133 1,3-Dichloropropane uglkg 50 53.9 108 79-132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene uglkg 50 48.5 97 75-137 2,2-Dichloropropane uglkg 50 54.0 108 73-137 2-Butanone (MEK) uglkg 100 114 114 61-138 2-Chlorotoluene uglkg 50 51.7 103 73-138 2-Hexanone uglkg 100 113 113 58-159 4-Chtorotoiuene uglkg 50 53.0 106 75-136 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) uglkg 100 117 117 74-139 Acetone uglkg iD0 135 135 58-150 Benzene uglkg 50 54.3 109 71-140 Bromobenzene uglkg 50 54.7 109 72-144 Bromochioromethane uglkg 50 68.7 137 78-133 L3 Bromodichloromethane uglkg 50 54.0 108 78-133 Bromoform uglkg 50 51.1 102 74-132 Bromomethane uglkg 50 55.1 110 63-184 Carbon tetrachloride uglkg 50 62.0 124 73-143 Chiorobenzene uglkg 50 53.3 107 77-137 Chloroethane uglkg 50 55.2 110 68-146 Chloroform uglkg 50 58.0 116 75-137 Chioromethane uglkg 50 51.8 104 54-143 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene uglkg 50 56.6 113 71-143 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene uglkg 50 54.1 108 76-133 Dibromochloromethane uglkg 50 52.4 105 77-131 Dibromomethane uglkg 50 56.4 113 63-184 Dichlorodifluoromethane uglkg 50 47.7 95 36-173 Diisopropyi ether uglkg 50 57.5 115 68-144 Ethylbenzene uglkg 50 52.6 105 69.141 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene uglkg 50 49.2 98 70-152 lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) uglkg 50 53.5 107 77-143 m&p-Xylene uglkg 100 106 106 72-138 Methyl-tert-butyl ether uglkg 50 63.3 127 2-138 Methylene Chloride uglkg 50 50.4 101 69-136 n-Butyibenzene uglkg 50 50.5 101 65-128 n-Propylbenzene uglkg 50 53.6 107 72-139 Naphthalene uglkg 50 52.5 105 61-138 o-Xylene uglkg 50 54.3 109 74-137 p-Isopropyttoiuene uglkg 50 51.5 103 66-128 sec-Butylbenzene uglkg 50 52.5 105 72-140 Styrene uglkg 50 52.1 104 76-137 tert-Butylbenzene uglkg 50 55.3 ill 68-141 Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 27 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. rr1&&: e Pace Analytical S. i, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. - _ ceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 wwwpacvlaftcom Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, PVC 28070 (828)254-7176 (704)975-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project. ARAMARK - GSd Pace Project No.: 9264745 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 412475 Units Spike Conc. LC5 Result LCS % Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers Tetrachloroethene uglkg 50 50.7 101 72-136 Toluene uglkg 50 54.5 109 69-139 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene uglkg 50 54.1 108 72.144 trans-1.3-Dichloropropene uglkg 50 55,1 110 73-135 Trichloroethene uglkg 50 54.6 109 75-136 Trichlorofluoromethane uglkg 50 51.9 104 69-144 Vinyl acetate uglkg 100 36AJ 36 50-150 L0 Vinyl chloride uglkg 50 48.3 97 61-145 Xylene (Total) uglkg 150 160 107 73-138 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 110 69-121 4-Bromoflucrobenzene (S) % 9$ 74-115 Dibromofluoromethane (S) % 102 79-116 Toluene-d8 (S) % 101 88-110 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: Parameter 412903 Units 9264750001 Result Spike Conc. MS Result MS °% Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers 1,1-Dichloroethene uglkg ND 52.1 68.8 132 33-158 Benzene uglkg NO 52.1 62.5 120 46-143 Chlorobenzene ugAg NO 52.1 59.1 113 29-159 Toluene uglkg NO 52,1 62.4 120 38-145 Thchloroethene uglkg NO 52.1 64.4 124 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 113 69-121 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) % 91 74-115 Dibromofluoromethane (S) % 102 79-116 Toluene-d8 (S) % 101 88-110 SAMPLE DUPLICATE 412904 9264745003 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane uglkg ND ND 1.1.1-Thchloroethane uglkg ND N❑ 1,1.2,2- Tetra chloroethane uglkg ND ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane uglkg ND ND 1,1-Dichloroethar* uglkg ND ND 1,1-DicMoroethene uglkg ND ND 1,1-Dichloropropene uglkg N❑ N0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene uglkg ND ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane uglkg ND ND 1,2,4-TrieNorobenzene uglkg ND ND 1,24-Trimethylberizene uWkg ND ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chtoropropane uglkg N❑ ND 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) uglkg ND ND 1,2-Dichicrobenzene uglkg N❑ ND 1.2-Dichloroethane uglkg NO NO Date: 03/22/2010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 28 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Anal ytical Services, Inc rebel • x Pace Analytical S. I. Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100 www.oacoraes.corr. Asheville. NC 28804 HunterswIle, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 Protect: ARAMARK - GSG Pace Protect No. 9264745 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 412904 Parameter 1.2-Dichloropropane 1.3 , 5-Tri methyl be nzerle 13-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,2-Dichloropropane 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Chlorotoluene 2-Hexanone 4-Chlorotoluene 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Acetone Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodi ch to ro methane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloraethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cls-1,3-Dichloropropene ❑ i b romoch I o rom ethane Dibromomethane DiChlorodiRucromethane Diisopropyl ether Ethyibenzene Hexachloro-1.3-buladiene lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) m&p-Xylene Methyl -tent -butyl ether Methylene Chloride n-Sutylbenzene n-Propylbenzene Naphthalene o-Xylene p-Isopropyltaluene sec-Butylbenzene Styrene tent-Butylbenzene Tetrachlorcethene Toluene trans-l.2-Dichloroethene trans-1.3-0ichloropropene Trlchloroethene Date: 03122/2010 04:28 PM QUALITY CONTROL DATA Units 9264745003 Result ❑up Result uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg ND NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO N❑ uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg N❑ NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO N❑ uglkg ND NO uglkg ND NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg ND NO uglkg ND NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO ND uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO NO uglkg NO ND uglkg NO N❑ uglkg N❑ ND RPD oualifers REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of PPace +Analytical Services, Inc. Page 29 of 33 m Pace Analytical Si i, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Ins, aceAnalytical 2225 Riverside Or 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 WAWPasalabs tcr++ Asheville. NC 26804 Huntersvnle. NC 2807E (828)254-7175 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: ARAMARK -GSG Pace Project No. 9264745 SAMPLE IJUPLICATE. 412904 Parameter Units 9264745003 Result Dup Result RPD Qualifiers Trichlorofluoromethane uglkg N❑ NO Vinyl acetate uglkg ND NO Vinyl chloride uglkg NO NO Xylem (Total) uglkg NO NO 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 116 117 0 4-Bromofluorobenxene (S) % 95 95 1 Dibromofluoromethane (S) % 117 104 12 Toluene-d8 (S) °% 101 102 0 Date: 03)2212010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced. except in full. without tl to written Con se}nt�of Pace An a lytl caI Services, Inc. l �i.ALiL Page 30 of 33 ;alc e A na iy fica / e wompaculaftmm Project: ARAMARK - GS0 Pace ProjectNo.: 9264745 Pace Analytical Sr i, Inc. 2225 Riverside Dr. Asheville, NC 288D4 (e28)254-7176 QUALITY CONTROL DATA QC Batch: PMST13O6O Analysis Method ASTM D2974-87 QC Batch Method: ASTM D2974-87 Analysis Description: Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 9264745001. 9264745002, 9264745003, 9264745004 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 411983 9264672002 Dup Parameter Units Result Resutt RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 17.5 19.7 12 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 411984 9264745004 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 24.8 23.7 5 Date: 03/22/2014 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Ina. y Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9500 Kinney Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 20078 (704)875-9092 Page 31 of 33 Pace Analytical Si Inc. 2ace Analytical 2225 Riverside Dr wwxpace7abs can Asheville. INC 26604 (828)254.7176 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project. ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No.: 9264745 QC Batch. PMST13061 Analysis Method: ASTM D2974-87 QC Batch Method: ASTM 02974-87 Analysis Description. Dry WeighVPercent Moisture Associated Lab Samples 9264745005. 9264745006, 9264745007. 9264745008. 9264745009. 9264745010. 9264745011 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 412013 9264642041 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 21.1 18.6 13 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 412016 9264642051 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 18.6 18.9 2 Date: 0 3122)2 010 04:28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not he reproduced, except in (WI. without the written consent of PPaajcee+Analyhcal Services_ Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875.9092 Page 32 of 33 s Pace Analytical Si 1, Inc. Pace Analytical Servicas. Inc. aeeAnalytical 2225 Rrversrde Dr 9BDO K.ncey Ave. Suite 100 vww tic afls c.:�r Asheville. NC 28504 Hunterswlle, NC 26078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 QUALIFIERS Protect ARAMARK - GSO Pace Project No: 9264745 DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, If reported. represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of the sample aliquot, or moisture content. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. M D L - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. S - Surrogate t.2-Diphenylhydrazlne (8270 listed analyte) decomposes toAzobenzene. Consistent with EPA guidelines. unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS C9 Common Laboratory Contaminant. E Analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range. The reported result is estimated. LID Analyte recovery in the laboratory control sample (LCS) was outside QC limits. L3 Analyte recovery in the laboratory control sample (LCS) exceeded QC limits. Analyte presence below reporting limits In associated samples. Results unaffected by high bias S2 Surrogate recovery outside laboratory Control limits due to matrix interferences (confirmed by similar results from sample re -analysis). S3 Surrogate recovery exceeded laboratory control limits. Analyte presence below reporting limits in associated samples. Results unaffected by high bias. Date 03/22/2010 04 28 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS page 33 of 33 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written win se�ntt of PPaacee Analytical Services, Inc. ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMEN-FAL SERVICES, INC. AES March 16, 2010 Renee Snencer Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincev Avenue, Suite 100 Huntersville NC 28078 TEL: (704) 875-9092 FAX: (704) 875-9091 RE: 9264745 Dear Renee Spencer: Order No: 1003709 Analytical Environmental Services, Inc, received 3 samples on March 9. 2010 10:55 am for the analyses presented in following report. No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative. AES' certifications are as follows: -NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water, soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/09-06/30/10. -AIHA Certification ID # 100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) effective until 09/01 / 1 1. These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call. Janice Winn -Shilling Project Manager 3785 Ilk i .ss+i %i i,u ]INK KN% %N • Art AN t.a, C II , 30 3.4[i • Te i : (770) 457-6177 • fAX- f 77[31457-81 Fitt Page 1 of 11 Chain of Custody Workorder: 9264745 Workorder Name: ARAMARK - GSO Results Requested 3/19/2010 P1Q�� aceAnalXkal w+vw.aacarsas.cpm 0 N e] a Report 1 Irrvoicc To Subcontract To Re vested Analysis Renee Spencer �[ Pace Anafyical Charlotte 9800 Kinoey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersviile, INC 28078 Phone(744)875-9092 k Email: renee.spencer@pacelabs.com Preserved Containers f Collect Item Sample 10 Oatef7ime Lap ID Matrix = LAB USE ONLY 1 B-20 3/412010 09-.50 9264745002 Solid 2 E-33 314120101110 9264745005 Solid -� 3 ` 5 � � Comments Transfers Released By datelTime I "Received By ❑ateMme q2 J 4 15 �. Ida y Rlarcn 05. 20ci; : FMT-ALL-C-002rev.00 24Mzr&2009 . t0 6'p4•�{� Chain of Custody Workorder: 9264745 Workorder Name: ARAMARK - GS❑ Results Requeste-d 3/19/2010 WO 3111 ivo370'i aceAnalyAcat' o aM M a Report 1 Invoice To Subcontract To RequeSted Analysis Renee Spencer j' % Pace Analytical Chartotte P.� 1� [�� 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hun#ersvil[e, NC 26078 � Phone (704)875-9092 Email: renee.spencer@pacelabs.com Preserved Containers r_ Collect m m Item Sample 10 DatefTime Lab iD Matrix LAB USE ONLY 1 B-20 3/4/2010 09:50 9264745002 Solid 2 E-33 3,4i2010 111L0 9264745005 Solid 3 L-10-15 3141201014:20 9264746012 Solid 4 5 j Comments Transfers eie d SY Daterrime a +ved By DatefTime l cc; soy A)Xnte 1 ^ i iU Tuesday. March 09, 2010 1:39:31 PM FMT-ALL-C-002rev.04 24March2009 Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 22-Mar-10 Client: Pace Analyticat Services, Inc. Project: 9264745 Case Narrative Lab ID: 1003709 Sample 1003709-003A113 was received on 3/10/2010 @ 12:35pm. Per COC instructions to log with job 9264745. it was added to this WO. Page 4 of 11 Analytical Environmental Services. Inc Date: 22-Mar-10 Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Client Sample ID: B-20 Project: 9264745 Collection Date- 3/4/2010 9.50.00 AM Lab ID: 1003709-001 Matrix: Solid Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units Batch[D Dilation Date Analyzed Analyst Limit Factor Total Organic Carbon SW9060A Modified (SW9060 Modified) Total Organic Carbon (TOC) BR1. 500 mglkg-dry 126336 1 03/11/2010 1122 GP Chemical Oxygen Demand (CUD) E410.4 Chemical Oxygen demand '4 10 m&I R167344 1 03/12/2010 10.20 MG QUA110 rs: Value exceeds maximum tormu inani ltrvel BRL Below reporting limit H HoMi ng times for preparation or analysts exceeded ti Amlyle not NELAC certified B Arm lyre deected in the wocured method blank Catwler than Result val tie E Esnmulled (v4ve above Quanlnahan range) S Spike Recovery outside Moss due to matrix Nary See w VI r L ve NC Not confirmed I Lei than Result Wue Page 5 of 11 Anal tical )Environmental Services, Inc Date: 22-Mar-10 Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Client Sample ID: E-33 Project: 9264745 Collection Date. 3/4/2010 11:10:00 AM Lab ID: 1003709-002 Flatrix: Solid Anal ses Result Reporting Dilution y Limit Qual l nits BatchlD Factor bate Analyzed Analyst Total Organic Carbon SW9060A Modified (SW9060 Modified) Total Organic Carbon (TOQ l3ltl. 5w mg/KS-dry 126336 1 0311 1/2010 14:19 GR Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) E410.4 Chemical Oxygen Demand 56 10 man- R167344 1 031121201010;20 MG [)ualinees: Value exceeds maximum comamiiMnt level BRL Below reporting limn H Holding inru i for prepilranon m analyhn exceeded N Analyze no[ NTELAC mnified B Analyze delecmd in the associated method plank I Comm than RcauIi value E Estimated (va iue abovc gw,imauon rangc) 5 Spike Recovery outwdo limits due to mattm Tarr Sec east aar twe YC Not confirmed c Laes than Res" value Page 6 of 11 Analytical Environmental Services. Inc Date: 22-Mar-10 Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Client Sample 1D: L-10-15 Project: 9264745 Collection Dote: 3/412010 2:20:00 PM Lab ID. 1003709-003 Matrix: Solid Reporting Dilution Analysts Result Qual [nits SatcitlD I]are .Inaly►ed .In:elgst Limit Factor Total Organic Carbon SW9060A Modified [SW9060 Modified] Toted Organic: Carbon (TOC) 769 100 »g. Kg -dry 126336 1 0311212R10 10.58 GR Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) E410.4 Chemical Oxygen Demand 9kt lu mg'L 11167344 1 0311V2010 10.20 MG Qualifiers: Value excaeds maximum contaminant Iwel BRL Below re oruog hrrBI H Holding (kmes for preparamon or analysts "Coeded 4 Amlyle not NELAC arufted B Atmlyte datoa W to the associated method blank I Greaser Than Result �nlue £ Esumatodlvaluoabovegvanotauonramge) S Spike Recovery outside Ian, ro due to matrin parr sw case narramvc NC Not confirmed Less than Result value Page 7 of 11 Analytical Enviroinnental Services, Inc. 5an1ple/Cooler Receipt Checklist Clieltt �_ L �l_ (York Order Numbcr Checklist completed by 11 C—L Signat�atur Oate ' Carrier name. FcdEa /UPS Courier Client US Mail Other Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes _ Custody seats intact on sample: bottles? Yes ContainerlTemp Blank temperature in compliance? (40C±2)1 Yes Fv 3Cooler Cooler # I #2 Cooler #3 Cooler #4 Chain of custody present? Yes Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes ► / Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes Sample conlainers intact? Yes Sufficient sample volunte for indicated test? Yes All samples received within holding time? Yes Was TAT COC? Yes marked on the Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes VOA Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No vials submitted Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes _ No _ . Not Present No _ Not Preseut No Not Present N`o Coolers Cooler#G NO No No No T NO _ No No No No Yes No Not Applicable No Nat Applicable Adjusted? Checked by Sample Condition: Good J Other(Explain) (For diNusive sautples or A I H A lead) Is a known blank included? Yes _ No See Case Narradve For resolution of the Non -Conformance, • sat»hles do not Irate to Comply %;:itIt lhegi%en mrige tau eertTin p7raMelers. 1UQuality AssurartccWheckIists Procedures Sign-O[t Temp latcslChcckIistslSAmple Receipt ChecklisOSatnpie_Cooler_R'Oceipt_Chccklist Page 8 of 11 Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Sample/Cooler Receipt Checklist Client D& Wort: Order Number Checklist completed by�__� f Q d Signature Date Carrier name: FedEx V UPS Couricr Client US Mail Other Shipping container/cooler in good cnndillon? Yes Na _ Custody seals intact on shipping containerlcooler? Yes _ No _ Custody seals intact on sainple bottles? Yes _ No _ Cosrtaincf/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (4C-t2)* Yes *"f No f Cooler N1 ' [. Cooler #2 Cooler #3 Cooler P4 Chain of custody ]resent? Yes �% No _ Chain of custody signed tvhen relinquished and received? Yes No Chniti of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes , No Sarupics in proper conlainerlbotile? Yes No _ Sample containers intact? Yes No Sufficient sample. voltune for indicated test`? Yes No All samples received within holding time? Yes No _ Was TAT marked on the COC? Ycs No Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes _ No Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted Yes Water - pli acceptable upon receipt? Yes _ No Adjusted? ._Checked by Snrnple Condition: Good _ Other(Explain) (For diffusive samples or AIHA ]cad) is a known blank included? Yes See Case Narrative for resolutfotl of the Non-Cofformance. Not Present _ Not Pitscnt Not Present Cooler115 Cooler lib Not Applicable JLZ No Not Applicable No _�"/ * Saniples de not have I comply with the givmi ranga for certain parameters VQuality Assurance\Checklisls Procedures Sign-0 W Tcrnplates\ClsrrkIisl0arriple Rioceipt Check) istASanip] e Choler Rmeipt_Cliec klis[ Page 9 of 11 Analytical En►ironntcntal Services, Inc Client: Pace Analytical Services. Inc. Project Name: 9264745 W orko rd er: 1003 709 Dale: 16-Mar-10 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT Batch 11R: 126336 Sample ID: MB-126336 Client ID: Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 03/10/2010 Run No: 167321 5ample'rype: MBLK TestCode: Total Organic Carbon S►►'9a60A !Modified BatchlD: 126336 Analysis Date: 03/11/2010 Seq No: 3469277 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val o/oREC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RP❑ RPD Limit Qua[ Total Organic Carbon (TOC) SRI. 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample ID: LCS-126336 Client ID: Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 03/10/2010 Run No: 167321 Samplelype: LCS TestC:ode: 'toW1 Orgpnir Carbon S►F'91MDA modified BatchID: 126336 Analysis fate: 03/11/2010 Seq No: 3469278 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit Qual Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 2673 500 2140 0 125 70 130 0 0 0 Sample ID: 1003709-001BDUP Client ID: B-20 Units: mglKg-dry Prep Date: 03/1012010 Run No: 167321 SampleType: DIT TeSICode: Total Organic Carbon SW50"OA Modified BatchlD: 126336 Analysis Date: 03/11/2010 Seq No: 3469280 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val o%REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Rcf Val %RPD RPD Limit Qua] Total Organic Carbon (1.()C) BRL 500 Il 0 224.0 0 50 t)uallners: I Ciro w Shan Re.ult value aRl. Below tcpmsirig Iimii f Eehmaled %xIue delecled below Relxrmng 1-mat Rpt Lim Repmnng Limn Less then ke%ult value E E"imled [value above quonl cur arc ranyol N Analyte not NEI.Ar ocrnfied S Sprke Reonvm• o w4c Irmth due io matnx B Ana 17Re decocted in the aafapated mnhod blank 11 Holding iiiti s for preparation or rnolysts exceeded R Rt'n aut.i* bimis due to roan% Page 10 of 11 Anaivtical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 16-Mar-10 Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT Projeet Name: 9264745 Workorder: 1003709 BatchID: R167344 Sample 1D: M11-14167344 Client ID: Units: mg/L Prep Date: Run No: 1673" SampleType: MBLK TestCnde: Chemical Orygm demand (CUD) E410.4 BatchlD: R167344 Analysis Date: 03/12/2010 Seq Net: 3469849 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Law Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit Qua! Chemical Oxygen Demand BRL 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample ID: LCS-R]67344 Client ID: Units: mg1L Prep Date: Run No: 167344 SampleType: LC S TestCnde: Chemical Oxygen Drmnad (COD) E410.4 BatchID- R167344 Analysis Date: 03/12/2010 Seq No: 3469850 Analyte Result RP7' Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit Qua] Chemical Oxygen Demand 497.8 10 500 0 99.6 90 110 0 0 0 Sample 1D. 1003572-001DMS Client ID: Units: mgll. Prep Bate: Run No. 167344 SalnpleType: MS TestCnde: Chemist Oxygen Demand (COD) E410.4 BatchlD: R167344 Analysis Date: 03/1212010 Seq No: 3469958 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Rei'Val %RVD RPD Limit Qual Chemical Oxygen Demand 393.2 12 375 21.44 99.1 90 110 0 0 0 Sample ID: 1003687-NIFMS Client ID: Units: mg/l. Prcp Date: Run No: 167344 SampleType: MS Tes(Codc. Chemical Oxygen nemand (COD) E414.4 BAtchlD; R167344 Analysis Date; 03/12/2010 Seq No: 3472933 Analyte Result RPT limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Law Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD limit Qua] Chemical Oxygen Demand 38T5 12 375 12.28 100 90 110 0 0 0 Sample ID: 1003572-OOIDMSD Client 1D: Units: mglL Prep Date: Run No: 167344 SampleType: MSD TestCnde: Chemical Oxygen demand (COD) E410.4 Batch[D: R167344 Analysis Date: 03/12/2010 Seq No: 3469859 Analyte Result RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val °/oRPD RPD Limit Qual Chemical Oxygen Demand 398.9 12 375 21.44 101 90 110 393.2 1.45 30 opalfieea. I GrrOter thAD Rrsull .glue gal. 11e10n repening hnut 1 Fsnarwted value delrcled hrlmr Rcpanmg! an5n ltpt Lin aepornng Lnna L.css lban Result va]uc F. Esumaled (mine above quanutatim range) N AFiat lytcnot NFl_ACcttnfrd S Spike Rrcmery outsade I nuts due to manik a Analyte detected to the assoctaled mcrhod blank 11 Holdin limes Poe preparation OF analyses neredrd R RPD outstde Imtats due to nialnx Page 11 of 11 PaceAnalytical ' n.ra Fe nnm CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY ! Analytical Request Document The Chain -of-Cuslody, is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant frelds must be Completed accurately, Pape. of Section A Secton 8 Sadlon C Required Chen! Information Required Project Information' IhvNCa Informaton: R f C an iCornV L L Atlenl 13250 rl L�� .. Adelhgyt �i J copy in: Cn� Najm�+� REGULATORY AGENCY Order No. Address: Paw00we I NPIDES GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER f UST i RCRA OTHER Emaii To Purchase Reference: - 7 I1 Fax �leme — ! n ` �l [1 PPujed ncC Ace Par Vte Location STATE: ua Requested Data AT: Propel Number: Pars Profan ■ VIA■ Requested Analysis Filtered {YINj Sactian D Matrix Cad bs Z Roqu i rod is f;- ,r l•r�n Tf RI% r CODE COLLEGTEQ Preservatives )' Dnnkrng Water DW U 2 Water WT Wnafe Wn1nr vvVJ $ S tj m �eririll .r rwsir. ,LNrwB 0 J Product P � 51 Aki G.tii ` 'V 151�.!(V�(~{■, SorYSaGd Si p N ri _ y } SAMPLE ID O' w �? - - _ C) W H - to Z, 08l .-I Ap AN O D -n a r p a Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS ❑ U a w � d � c� � 0Other OT x N C, 5► f J I 3 �%� a p =Oro c `m c! a M 15 ❑ E D ME N D T-_ z z Pace Project No-1 Lab I.O. r to 0 s ato b 3 C-- ao o - 115 1 10 3b rWq 7 - 7,C7 L a• e - I i 3 05izv 4 r x JCJ Y k ip (4L 11 0 i 12 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED BY 1 AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED SY_1 AAFFILIATION DATE TIME SAMPLE CONDTTIONS - (L) [rr 6 G�J 1633 I.Cel C4 A.) SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE ORIGINAL 8 PRINT Name of SAMPLER- 754 a5 .n O x O m E DATE Signed SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: (MMODIYYI: 3-�4'--�o7 N rn 1n'porian! Note. By sipring this form yW ore adcepBnP Pace's NET 30 day payment fem+s and ayruerrg w late chargos of + 55o per monlnvany rnrnn;es rm[ psd w d— 30 days F-ALL-0-010r6v.U1, T 5-May-GW 1 Tom, ■ ■ ■ 1 a � � ■ ,Face Analytical Client Name:&&Q_ � 1_/_VW 1 P rah ect # �� Courier- [] Fed Ex ❑ ups ❑ USPs Client ❑ Co erciai ❑ Pace Other Optional Pro- I]ue. Date: NIA Custody Seal on Cooler.Box Present- ❑ yes na Seals intact- ❑ yes na j" >''roj. Maine:..- _'.-_' ``NCR ::---. Packing Material: ❑ Bubble Wrap ubl✓le Bags ❑ None ❑other Thermometer Used T060 Type of Ice: 69 Blue None Samples or. ice, cooling process has begun Gooier Temperature !I Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No NIA Date and initials of person examining eontenrs: Ter-p should be above freezing to 6'C Comments: Chain of Custody Present re WNo GNIA 1. Chain of Custody Filled Out: Yes ❑No IINIA 2, Chain of Custody Relinquished es ON ❑NIA 3- Sampler Name & Signature on COC: Ye No ❑NIA 4. Samples Atrived within Hold Time res ❑Ma ❑NIA 5. Short Hold Time Analysis (<72hr); []Yes eN. ❑NIA 6 Rush Turn Around Time Requested -❑fires N❑ '❑NIA 7. Sufficient Volume: 2 es ❑No ONIA g. Correct Containers Used- -. yes- ONO ❑NIA g. -Pace Containers Used. fires ONO ❑NIA Containers lntact. Yes ONO ❑NIA 10. Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests ❑Yes ONO L2<1A 11 Sample Labels match CCC: ❑Yes o ❑NIA 12 We &Cef 7Wr cam'f 5 Ndr 000 -includes date/time/10/Analysis Matrix: C. (0• C.s All containers needing preservation have been checked. Yes ONoCR lA 13 L ~ / L) j!�2 r)d-ke toT- . All containers needing preservation are found to he rn J A • �, — /0 — �5 L t: /O compliance with EPA recommendation. f s ONO exceptions: VOA, ccliform, TOC, O&G, UN-DRO {watery ❑Yes ONO nilial when corrpieted Samples checked for dechiorination: ❑Yes ONO UINOFIA 14- Headspace in VCA Vials { >6mm) Ores ONO NIA 15. Trip Blank Present: ❑Yes ONO 9 NI 16, Trip Blank Custody Seals Present ❑res ONO NIA Pace Trip Blank Lot # (if purchased): NIA Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y 1 N / NIA Person Contacted. Comments/ Resolution: DatelTime, Project Manager Review: 1?AJ mate: 110 ON P Note. Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR Certification Office (i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers) lacmnalyfical' amy., acela�s.ctr. March 19, 2010 Mr. Joe Nestor Nesco Environmental PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 RE: Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 Dear Mr. Nestor: Pace Analytical Si i, Inc. 2225 Riverside Rr. Asheville, NC 28804 [828)254-7175 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 KinceyAve. suae Too Huntersville, NC 28078 Enclosed are the analytical results for samples} received by the laboratory on March 05, 2010. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report. Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersviile laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Renee Spencer renee-spencer@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full without the written consent off PPaacee Analytical Services, Inc. [704]875.9092 Page 1 of 12 aceAnalyticalr www.p&cLvabs.com Project: Aramark-Greensboro Paw Project No. 9264741 Asheville Certification IDS 2225 Riverside Dr. Asheviiie, NC 28804 Connecticut Certification #: PH-0106 Virginia Certification #: 00072 Tennessee Certification #: 2980 South Carolina Certification #: 99030001 South Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 99030002 Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-03578 North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40 Pace Analytical SP r, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kinsey Ave Suite 100 Asheville, NC 28804 Huntermile, NC 28078 (828)254-7178 (704)875-9092 L44:1:7191;1toL•vaIto]kill North Carolina Drinking Water Certification # 37712 North Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 9 New Jersey Certification #: INC 011 Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030 Louisiana/LELAP Certification #: 03095 Flodda/NELAP Certification #: E876" West Virginia Certification #: 356 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 2 of 12 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc nelac r Pace Analytical & r, Inc. Pace Analytical Servkea, Inc. ceAnalyfical 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suits 100 w*w 00M Asheville, NC 28004 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7178 (704)875.9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 Sample: MW-3A Lab ID: 9264741001 Collected: 03/05/10 13:00 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Water Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Clual 200.7 MET ICP, 3030C Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: SM 3030C Iron 24700 ug/L 50.0 1 03/08/10 09:49 03/16/10 20:23 7439-89-6 Manganese 323 uglL 5.0 1 03/08/10 09:49 03/16/10 20:23 7439-96-5 200.7 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Methad: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Iron, Dissolved 1880 uglL 50.0 1 03115/10 11:49 0306110 2217 7439-69-6 Manganese, Dissolved 45.3 ug/L 5.0 1 03/15/10 11:49 03M6110 22:17 7439-96-5 363.2 Nitrogen, N07JN03 unpres Analytical Method; EPA 353.2 Nitrogen. Nitrate 18.7 mg1L 0.40 4 03/05110 22 16 Nitrogen, Nitrite 2.3 mglL 0.40 4 03/05/10 22:16 Nitrogen. NO2 plus NO3 21.0 mgl>_ 0.40 4 03/05/10 22:16 5220D COD Analytical Method: SM 5220D Chemical Oxygen Demand ND mglL 25.0 1 03/17/10 11:58 53108 TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B Total Organic Carbon 12.2 mglL 1.0 1 03/11/10 19:45 7440-44-0 ASTM D516.90 Sulfate Water Analytical Method: ASTM D516-90 Sulfate 37.8 mg/L 10.0 2 03111/1011:58 14808-79-8 Date: 03/1912010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reprpduced, except in full. wdhrut the wrOon consent of Peeac+Analytical Services, Ina ti lG7PaaIL. Page 3 of 12 Pace Analytical Sr 3, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 2aceAnalyticala 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 www =R Asheville, NC 28004 Huntersville. NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 Sample: MW-4A Lab ID: 9264741002 Collected: 03/05/10 11:30 Received: 03/05/10 16:33 Matrix: Water Parameters Results units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. ❑ual 200.7 MET ICP, 3030C Analytical Method EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: SM 3030C Iron 2290 uglL 50.0 1 03/08/10 09.49 03116/10 20:16 7439-89-8 Manganese 52.1 ug1L 5.0 1 03/08/10 09'49 03/16110 20:16 7439-96-5 200.7 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7 Iron, Dissolved 257 uglL 50.0 1 03/15/10 11.49 03/16/10 22:34 7439-89-6 Manganese, Dissolved 15.6 uglL &0 1 03/15/10 11 A9 03/16/10 22,34 7439-96-5 3S3.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres Analytical Method EPA 353.2 Nitrogen, Nitrate 1.9 mglL 0,10 1 03/05/10 22:11 Nitrogen, Nitrite 0.40 mg/L 0.10 1 03/05/10 22:11 Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 2.3 mglL 0,10 1 D3105110 22,11 5220D COD Analytical Method: SM 5220D Chemical Oxygen Demand ND mg1L 25.0 1 D3117110 11:58 5310E TOC Anatyticai Method: SM 5310B Total Organic Carbon 3.7 mglL 1.0 1 D3111110 19:45 7440-44-0 ASTM D516.90 Sulfate Water Analytical Method: ASTM D516-90 Sulfate 40.8 mWL 10.0 2 D3111110 12:00 14808-79-8 MO Date: 03/19/2010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. o� Page 4 of 12 CeAnaljftala www.paceiam.can Pace AnalytkaI Si I. Inc. 2225 Riverside Or. Asheville, NC 28804 (H28)254-7178 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 HuntersvMe, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No. 9264741 Sample: MW-4B Lab ID. 9264741003 Collected: 03/05/10 10:25 Received: 03/05110 16:33 Matrix: Water Parameters 200.7 MST ICP, 3030C Iron Manganese 200.7 MET ICP Dissolved iron, Dissolved Manganese, Dissolved 363.2 Nitrogen, N021NO3 unpres Nitrogen, Nitrate Nitrogen, Nitrite Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 5220D COD Chemical Oxygen Demand 53108 TOC Total Organic Carbon ASTM D516.90 Sulfate Water Sulfate Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Llual Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: SM 3030C 97.5 uglL 50,0 1 03/08/10 09:49 03116/10 19:59 7439-89-6 6.8 ug1L 5.0 1 03/08110 09:49 03/16/10 19:59 7439-96-5 Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 2007 54.6 ug/L 50.0 1 03/15/10 11:49 03/16/10 22:42 7439-89-6 17.6 ug/L 5.0 1 03/15/10 11 A9 03/16/10 22:42 7439-96-5 Analytical Method: EPA 353.2 6.2 mglL 0.10 1 03/05/10 22:07 ND mglL 0.10 1 03/05/10 22'07 6.2 mglL 0.10 1 03/05/10 22:07 Analytical Method: SM 5220D ND mg1L 25.0 1 03117110 11 :58 Analytical Method: SM 5310B 8.6 mg1L 1.0 1 03111/1019:45 7440.44-0 Analytical Method: ASTM 0516-90 39.3 mglL 5.0 1 03/11/10 11 A9 14808-79-8 r ANALYSIS except in full, dcal Services, Inc. Page 5 of 12 x Pace Analytical So r, Inc. Pate Analytical Services, Inc. aGeAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 WWW'OcOa"Com Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersvdle, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 QC Batch. MPRPI5935 Analysis Method: EPA200.7 QC Batch Method: SM 3030C Analysis Description: 200.7 MET 3030C Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002. 9264741003 METHOD BLANK: 411949 Matrix. Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002, 9264741003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Iron uglL N❑ 50.0 03116/1019:62 Manganese ugiL N❑ 5.0 0311611019:52 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 411950 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Cone. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Iron uglL 5000 5350 107 85-115 Manganese uglL 500 526 105 85-115 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE. 411951 9264741003 Spike MS MS °% Rec Parameter Units Result Cone. Result °% Rec Limits Qualifiers Iron ug/L 97-5 5000 4990 98 70-130 Manganese ug/L 6.8 500 485 96 70-130 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 411952 9264741002 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Iron ug1L 2290 2350 2 Manganese ug/L 62.1 52.8 1 Date: 0311912010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Without the written ccnse n„t of�Pace .Analytica I Services, Inc. Page 6 of 12 n / r r. Pace Analytical Si �. Inc. Pare Analytical Services, tnc. -;aceAnalytical' I alyti{ca 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kmcey Ave Suite 100 wwwpaceleascam Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 26078 te281254-7178 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Protect: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Protect No.'. 9264741 QC Balch- MPRP15968 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7 QC Batch Method- EPA200-7 Analysis Description. 200.7 MET Dissolved. Associated Lab Samples- 9264741001. 9264741002 9264741003 METHOD BLANK: 415076 Matrix: Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002. 9264741003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Iron, Dissolved ug1L ND 50.0 03/16/10 22:10 Manganese, Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 03/16/10 22-10 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 415077 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Iron. Dissolved ug/L 5000 4980 100 85-115 Manganese, Dissolved ug/L 500 496 99 85-115 MATRIX SPICE SAMPLE: Parameter 415078 Units 9264741001 Result Spike MS Ms Conc. Result % Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers Iron. Dissolved uglL 1880 5000 6390 90 70-130 Manganese, Dissolved ug[L 45.3 500 487 88 70-130 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 415079 9264741002 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Iron, Dissolved ug/L 257 250 3 Manganese, Dissolved ug/L 15,6 14.5 7 Date: 03/19/2010 0124 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the wrrtten con sent of Pace AnalyticaI Services, inc. „ 1 eta Page 7 of 12 ® Pace AnalyficsI Si I. Inc, Pace Analytical Services, Inc. aceAnalyitcal 2225 Riverside Or 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 WWWPac*b".=r+ Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 (828)254-7176 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 QC Batch: WETA16867 Analysis Method: EPA 353.2 OC Batch Method: EPA 353.2 Analysis Description: 353.2 Nitrate + Nitrite. Unpres. Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002, 9264741003 METHOD BLANK: 411766 Matrix Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001, 9264741002, 9254741003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/L ND 0.10 03/05110 21:56 Nitrogen, Nitrite mglL NO 0.10 03/05/10 21:56 Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 mg1L N❑ 0.10 03105/10 21:56 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 411767 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Nitrogen, Nitrate mg1L 5 513 106 90-110 Nitrogen, Nitrite rrlglL 1 1.1 108 90-110 Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 mg1L 5 5.3 106 90-110 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: Parameter 411768 Units 9264424012 Result Spike MS Conc. Result MS % Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers Nitrogen, Nitrate mg1L 1.4 5 7.0 111 90-110 M0 Nitrogen, Nitrite rrVL NO 1 1.1 112 90-110 M0 Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 mg1L 1.4 5 7.1) 111 90-110 MO SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 411769 9264-424013 ❑up Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Nitrogen, Nitrate mg1L 0.36 0.36 1 Nitrogen, Nitrite mg1L NO N❑ Nitrogen, NO2 plus NO3 tN/L 0.36 0.36 1 Date: 03/19/2010 0324 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full. with" the written GQnsent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 8 of 12 Pace Analytica1 34 c, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. /7KmAnalytical 2225 Riverside Dr 98M Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Asheville, NC 20804 H u ntersville, IYU 28078 [928]254-7176 (704)87S-9082 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 QC Batch: WETA16923 Analysis Method: SM 5220D QC Batch Method: SM 5220D Analysis Description: 5220D COD Associated Lab Samples. 9264741001. 9264741002, 9264741003 METHOD BLANK. 415460 Matrix: Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002. 9264741DO3 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Chemical Oxygen Demand mg1L NO 25.0 03/17/10 11:58 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 415461 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Chemical Oxygen Demand mg►L 750 747 100 90-110 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 415462 9264538001 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Chemical Oxygen Demand mglL 3350 1500 3180 -11 75-125 MO MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 415467 9265096001 Spike MS MS °% Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Chemical Oxygen Demand mg1L 1430 750 1580 21 75-125 MO SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 415466 9264540002 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Chemical Oxygen Demand mg1L 1700 1670 2 SAMPLE DUPLICATE- 415468 Parameter Chemical Oxygen Demand Date: 0311912D10 03:24 PM 9264688001 Dup Units Result Result mglL 1150 1150 RPD Qualifiers 0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 9 of 12 _ cekialytr'cale rrww.paoera6a.cvm Project: ATamark-Greensboro Pane Project No.: 9264741 Pace Analylica1 S s, Inc. 2225 Riverside Dr. Asheville. NC 28804 (828)254-7176 QUALITY CONTROL DATA OC Batch: WETM897 Analysis Method: SM 53108 QC Batch Method: SM 5316B Analysis Description: 5310E TOC Associated Lab Samples 9264741001, 9264741002, 9264741003 METHOD BLANK: 413827 Matrix Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001. 9264741002, 9264741003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon rVL ND 1.0 03/11/10 19:45 Pace Analytictai Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville. NC 28078 (704)875.9092 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 413828 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon mg/L 25 26.4 106 90-110 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 413830 9264173001 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon mg/L 5.0 25 31.8 107 75-125 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 414201 9264173002 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon mg1L 12.7 25 40.9 113 75-125 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 413832 9264173003 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon mg1L 14.7 14.8 1 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 414202 92641730D4 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RP❑ Qualifiers Total Organic Carbon mg/L 12.5 12.6 1 Date: 03/19/2010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced. except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc.. T=c Page 10 of 12 a Pace Analytical S. s, Inc. Pace AnalyticaI Services, Inc. 11!1ceAnalyfical2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Asheville, NC 28804 Hunteniville, INC 28078 (828)254-7178 (704)B75-9092 DUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 QC Batch: WETA16893 Analysis Method: ASTM D516-90 QC Batch Method: ASTM D516.90 Analysis Description: ASTM D516-90 Sulfate Water Associated Lab Samples: 9264741001, 9264741002, 9264741003 METHOD BLANK: 413665 Matrix: Water Associated Lab Samples. 9264741001, 9264741002. 9264741003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Sulfate mglL N❑ 5.0 03111MO11:38 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 413666 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Cony. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Sulfate mg)L 20 19.8 99 90-110 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 413667 9263819001 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result 56 Rec Limits Qualifiers Sulfate mg1L 5.8 20 13.9 40 75-125 MO MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 413669 9264741GDZ Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Sulfate mg/L 40.8 20 50.3 47 75-125 MO SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 413668 9263819W2 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Sulfate mglL 5.3 5.4 1 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 413670 9264741003 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Sulfate mglL 39.3 39.5 0 Date- 03I1912010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. 10 Page 11 of 12 Pace Analytical S s, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 2aceAnalytical' 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 Itincey Ave. Suite 100 �+w�arersCsxnr Asheville. NC 28804 Huntersvilie, NC 28078 (828)254.7176 (704)875.9092 QUALIFIERS Project: Aramark-Greensboro Pace Project No.: 9264741 DEFINITIONS ❑F - Dilution Factor, if reported. represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of the sample aliquot, or moisture content. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Lirnit. S - Surrogate 1,2-DlphenyIhydrazlne (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited anaIytes. U - Indicates the Compound was analyzed for, but not detected. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS M0 Matrix spike recovery andlor matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits Date: 03119/2010 03:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 12 of 12 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the watten consent of PPaace +Analytical Services, Inc. l IGiCiL , i PaceAnalytical' CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document The Cti ain-of-Custod y Is a LIEGAt- DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must tie completed accurately Section A Section B Section C Pago. of Required Cl,enl irirtrrrndtion Required Project informatco invok;8 Information: Co n �� , f-ak � R` r 1 Attention eSrir iL 135 2 313 q�- coy V 70 CA" � me C C— REGULATORYAGENCY L �, �b U A � i— NPDES DUND WATER f DRINKING WATER UST F RCRA f OTHER Email To: Purchase Order No. Pso@0joe RWe anti Fax- Prole me:� P°f'c Site Location S TA TE. �j Requested Ou U AT- i� �Q,IL� fl�� ProJ ct umhor. Pace prow ,� Requested Analysis Filtered [YIN] Section D Matrix Codas RpWnd Crm Ironmaban MATRa I cone 9 a COLLECTED W afrves x i Drinking water Dw wlew WT o w Waste water w Pfaducl P m cnuwstrE ®FART eNDOGIVA W z Sc4vs ld SL SAMPLE ID �? x ,� N Wpo °P (A-I.0-91,•1 AT AR w Q y Sample IDS MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS Other oT O X `� F O to in w + I w S O C o - va 1 ! 1 (o f— No oN r� DATE TIME TIME N 7 Y T z z ❑ a Pa Cis Project NO.I Lab 1.D- w-10 i 3 00 R 11 1 1 X AA KI X )d w -4 - t I X ?_2 3 w-14 a5 Xn 4 6 7 8 9 ,e 121 [-1- 1- 1 A —47 ADDITIONAL CGMMEN TS RELIN ISNED BY; AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY 1 AFFILIATION DATE TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS 4 3-z2 1(p--3 S ORIGINAL SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE c ^ PRINT Nama of SAMPLER= e 5 n � � SIGNATURE o1 SAMPLER: DATE Signed 2 ;MM7[1AIYYj: J �� - Q e7 ui •Irnpwtenl Note 6y eignnp Iha fwrn you am a PUng Paos's NET 30 day payment teens and agreernp to hate charges of 1.5% par Month fw(J� y invj— —1 paid wMh,n 30 da vs F-AI f -f7 :Pnmv n7 1 r..rNnv-wI w ■ • ■ • ■■ a ram_ -Face Analytical' Client NamefiCS(;C) dtrontrnemQPraject Courier: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ UPS ❑ USPS ❑ Client ❑ mercial Pace Other Custody Seal an Cooler/Box Present: ❑ yes n❑ Seals intact: ❑ yes Zn, Optional i Proj. Due Date: [VIA Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap 26ubble Sags ❑ None ❑ether epolh Thermometer Used TCSC Type of fee: et Blue None Samples on ice, Cooling process has begun Cooler Temperature r Biological Sue is Frozen: Yes No NIA Date ar.d Initial 10san Wing ton[e�ts: Tenp should be a"ove freezing to E'C Comments: Chain of Custody Present: Yes ONO ONIA 1. Chairs of Custody Filled Out: es No ©NIA. 2. Chain of Custody Relinquished: Yes No- ❑NIA 3. Sampler Name & Signature on COC: 61n No ❑NIA 4, Samples Arrived within Hold Time: Yes ❑N4' ❑NIA g. Short Hold Time Analysis (--72hr): es ❑NC: NIA 5, Rush Turn Around Time Requested: Gyes No - ❑NIA 7. Sufficient Volume: es ❑Ne ❑NIA S. Correct Containers Used: -Pace Containers Used: 7"V ❑No, ❑NIA ONO: ❑NIA 9, Containers Intact: Yes ONO ON/ 10- Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests ❑yes No NIA 11. Sample Labels match COC: -Includes date/time/ID/Analysis Matrix: es ❑No r ❑NIA 12. All containers needing preservalion have been checked - All containers needing preservation are found to be in compliance with EPA recommendation- exceptions: VOA, cotirorm, TOC, O&G, M-DRO (water) es ONO es ❑Na 0Y'V ONO ❑N!A ❑r�lA 13. Initial Nhen compieted Samples checked for dechlorination: Yes ❑No ❑NIA 14. Headspace in VOA Vials { >5mm): Dyes X0 ❑NI 5- Trip Blank Present: Trip Blank Custody Seals Present Pace Trip Blank t_ot # (if purchased): NfA ❑Yes ❑Yes ONO ONO IA IA £- Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y 1 N 1 NIA Person Contacted: DateMme: Comments] Resolution: Project Manager Review: Date: Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR Certification Office ( i e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers) 4FMC -Z�- Environmental Solutions K L 0 V Klozuro Persulfate Demand Test Client: Nesco Environmental PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 Joe Nestor Performing Lab: FMC Corporation Tonawanda, NY Date March 17, 2014 I. Background Klozuri° activated persulfate is a strong oxidant capable of mineralizing a wide range of contaminants, including chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, gasoline additives, pesticides, and many others. Activation of the persulfate anion generates the sulfate radical, the primary species that drives the rapid destruction of the contaminants of concern. Activation can be accomplished by several methods': heat, transition metals, addition of hydrogen peroxide, or utilizing high pH. Choice of the activation method will depend on the contaminant of concern and site characteristics. A chemical oxidant is not specific as to what it will oxidize. As a result, activated persulfate will not only mineralize the contaminant of concern, but a portion of the oxidant will be used in oxidizing soil organics, reduced metals, and organic species that are not of concern. in addition, activated persulfate will undergo auto -decomposition, which will be a function of temperature, concentration and activation method. The demand upon the activated persulfate from all of these components is captured in a coarse screening test termed, "Klozur Demand Test". it is dependent upon the site characteristics, such as the organic content of the soil, the mineral loading, and soil type and collectively must be considered for estimating the magnitude of oxidant dosing during field application. The Klozur® Persulfate KDT test measures the loss of persulfate in the presence of soil, groundwater and activator over a period of 48, 96, and 168 hrs (7-days). The resulting KDT values can then be used as a guide to develop FMC is the owner of Licensee under various patent applications relating to the use of activation chemistries FMC Corporation Report page 1 of 3 March 17. 2010 appropriate persulfate dosing for subsequent treatability testing and field applications. II. Sample Handling Client Sample Identification ■ Soil ID: L-10-15; GW ID; No groundwater sent, DiHIO Used. Handling Procedures • The sample was received on 03/08/2010. ■ During the collection of the preliminary data, the soil was well mixed, used and returned to the original container after its use. • No groundwater sample was sent, DiHzD was used in its place. • On 03/09/2010, multiple experimental samples were prepared according to the amounts shown in the results table below. ■ The experimental samples were stored at room temperature and each sample was vigorously shaken once per day. • About 1000 grams of the soil sample are left with us. The unused soil sample will be disposed responsibly after about one week. Ill. Results Klozur Consumption (gfkg) Sample ID Run # Trial Soil GW Klozur GW Activator Wt. Water Dosage pH t=48 t=96 t=144 hr (g) Vol. (g/Kg hr hr (mL) Soil) t=0 hrs. 1 NaOH 10 30 15 11.14- 1.55 1.63 2.42 L-10-1 S & 11.42 ❑IH2O 2 NaOH 10 30 15 11.14- 1.53 1.63 2.45 11.42 Soil Bufferina Demand = 2.14 gallons 26% NaOH/ 2000 lb of Soil Acid Generation Demand = 0.13 gallons 26% NaOHI lb of Klozur persulfate FMC Corporation Report page 2 of 3 March 17, 2010 IV. Conclusions The Klozur' Persulfate demand with high phl activation for the Soil Matrix Samples is approximately 1.5 g persulfate 1 kg soil, which is considered average to medium for most soils. It is recommended that this value be used to further refine estimated persulfate usage for the site- V. Authorizing Signatures This report contains the results as determined by FMC laboratory protocol and are accurately represented herein. Philip A. Block. PhD FMC Customer Representative Note. 1. FMC recommends performing suitable treatability testing and field pilot demonstration to determine the effectiveness of Klozury activated persulfate on the contaminants of concern. KDT testing provides only an indication of the minimum amount of oxidant required to overcome the demands of soil, groundwater and other secondary species that contribute to the usage of the oxidant. The KDT results do not imply a guarantee of efficacy of the activated persulfate in actual field situations. 2. ANY SUCH QUANTITY OR WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. FMC and Klozur are registered trademarks of FMC Corporation. © 2010. FMC Corporation Report page 3 of 3 March 17. 2010 APPENDIX !I PHOTOGRAPHS Advancing boring G. JE-3 = i E=5 Joseph P. Nestor From: Drew Baird [DBaird a@Regenesis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:37 PM To: Joseph P. Nestor Cc: Doug Davis Subject: RE. Greensboro job RFP Attachments: site map with concentration s-revised.pdf; Aramark GSO RegenOx design saprolite hotspots Apr 10.pdf Hi Joe: I have reviewed the site data for the saprolite zones you have described and have prepared a preliminary design for vadose zone treatment in two discrete hotspot locations. At this time, we are not targeting deeper intervals for treatment because 1) there are insufficient data in the vadose zone below approximately 22 feet bgs, and 2) this zone cannot be reached with DPT technologies, per your description. The high concentrations and concentration spikes in the MW-4 cluster indicates a possible DNAPL source near this area. Targeting this zone may require additional sampling to better delineate the CVOC architecture and plan an injection strategy in the vadose and saturated zones. We do not currently have a sufficient understanding of the bedrock aquifer to recommend treatment at this time. We suggest beginning with a focused treatment in the DPT-accessible vertical 'intervals as a means to begin source depletion. The treatments may also provide additional information on contaminant nature in the deeper zones simply by monitoring CVOC and geochemical changes in the deeper intervals. For the saprolite treatment, the areas we are suggesting for treatment (shown in orange on the attached map) are smaller than the areas shown on your proposed treatment zone. These areas are suggested for treatment because the magnitude of CVOC concentrations are much greater than in the surrounding borings. The areas in orange total approximately 1,800 sf. I have left the thickness of the treatment zone the same: 17 feet thick from 5-22 feet bgs (956 cy). I have assumed the following concentrations for this proposed treatment zone: 24 mg/kg PCE, 4.9 mg/kg TCE, and 2.7 mg/kg cDCE; the other detections are not significant enough to drive dosing. Soil porosity is assumed to be 40%. Based on these inputs, we recommend the following (summary table attached): 0 13,860 Ibs total RegenOx (6,930 Ibs Oxidant, 6,930 tbs Catalyst). This quantity equates to a dose rate of approximately 14.5 Ibs/cy. • 3 DPT injection events at 3-4 week intervals 4,620 Ibs RegenOx (2,310 Ibs Oxidant, 2,310 lbs Catalyst) per injection event 5,490 gallons RegenOx solution per injection event via 18 DPT borings. This volume is equivalent to 11.4% of the pore space within the treatment zone. The purpose of multiple applications is to ensure good distribution of oxidant and catalyst through the treatment zone. Please keep in mind that the proposed volume per application is equivalent to <12%of the pore space in the treatment zone, so the total "occupied" pore space after three injection events will be no more than approximately 34% of the treatment zone. This amount of pore space occupancy is typically sufficient to achieve mass depletion in source areas. Whether or not this occupancy rate is sufficient to achieve target cleanup levels depends on the actual distribution of solution during injection and the cleanup requirements. The cost of 13,860 Ibs RegenQx is $29,106 plus tax and shipping. In our experience, a good DPT crew can compiete 6-8 borings per day, indicating that each injection event may last approximately 3 days. We can provide recommendations for qualified injection contractors at your request. I can be available to discuss this preliminary estimate on Friday when I return to the office. Perhaps we can also discuss implications for the deeper vadose and saturated zones at this time. Please keep in mind that this is a preliminary design that we may revise upon further discussion with you. Best regards, Drew Drew Baird REGENESIS P: 864.240S181 1 M:864,884,4346 From: Joseph P. Nestor [mailto:nescoenv@carolina.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:05 PM To: Drew Baird Subject: RE: Greensboro job RFP Drew I think we want to go after hot spots in the spa rolite for sure. Also at this time, I just want to perform injections on properties owned by ARAMARK. Attached is a site map which shows the proposed treatment system area with blue hatching. The areas are based upon recent VOC analyses of soil samples. Area 1 is 787 sq ft. Area 2 is 1330 sq ft. {Total area = 2117 sq ft) I did not include boring K in Area 2 because the VOCs detected in it were petroieum-related and probably came from our friends at the nearby Exxon station. I assume we will be delivering chemical via DPT injection. The thickness of the treatment zone will probably be limited to how deep a DPT rig can go. The average refusal depth was approx 22 feet BGL. Assuming that we inject from 5 feet BGL to refusal that gives us 17 feet of thickness. Therefore, 2117 sq ft times 17 ft equals 35,989 cu. ft or 1332 cu yds. ❑o you think it would be worthwhile to deliver chemicals to transition zone via well MW-4B or into fractured bedrock via MW-3B? Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesoo Environmental, P.L.L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nescoenv@ca ro I i n a. rr. corn From: Drew Baird [mailto:DBaird@Regenesis.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:23 PM To: Joseph P. Nestor Subject: RE: Greensboro job RFP Thanks for submitting the data to me, Joe. My primary question is about the size and thickness of the zone targeted for remediation. Could you please mark the area on a map and indicate the thickness of the target treatment zone? I will contact you with additional questions. Best regards, Drew Drew Baird REGENESIS P: 864.240.9181 1 M:864,884.4346 From: Joseph P. Nestor[mailto:nescoenv@carolina.rr.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:36 PM To: Drew Baird Subject: Greensboro job RFP Brew: Attached is a RFP for the job site in Greensboro which we discussed last month at the conference. I will also be sending you a hard copy with a CO which will include background documents and laboratory reports. Please have a look and get back to me with your thoughts and any questions you may have. Thanks for your help. Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesoo Environmental, P L..L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nescoenv@carolina.rr.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0-800 1 Virus Database: 271 1.112795 - Release date: 04/07/10 14:32:00 4 20 feet i i 4 � MW 1 i VE- 11 I vm— i iAdol MW-3A m W�8 i g ao VE-6 �0.00.01 4 IRW(VE VW-3Boo - I - MW-2B MW-2A 9 -/ �-2(vE-7) ,.204 SOUTHER REALTY PROTECTIONO M W I 01 m W- 9B 9A RegenOx Summary Page Regenesis Technical Support: USA (949) 366-8000 Site Name: Aramark Greensboro Location: Saprolite treatment - Hotspots Consultant: Nesco Application Design Input Parameters Design Summary - INITIAL APPLICATION ONLY Width of plume (Intersecting gw flow direction) 20 ft Number of Regenax injection points (Initial app) 18 pts Length of plume (parallel to gw flow direction) 90 ft age nOx dose rate (oxidant + activator) (initial app) 15.1 fibs/ft Thickness of contaminated zone 17 ft otal amount of water required for initial application 5,019 gallons Soil type silly sand Total volume of RegenOx solution applied (initial app) 5482.3 gallons Estimated number of RegenOx applications required (enter 1 through 6) 3 Summary of Estimated RegenOx Totals Part A Part B Total RegenOx Cumulative Amount Cumulative Total RegenOx Application Amount of Activator Cumulative RegenOx Oxidant RegenOx Activator Material of Oxidant {Part A} Material Cast Per number {Ihs} {Ibs} Requirement {lbs} Applied {Ibs} (Part B) Applied RegenOx Cost Application {Ibs} First 2,310 2,310 4,620 2.310 2.310 $11,550 $11,550.00 Second 2.310 2,310 4.620 4,620 4.620 $23.100 $11,550.00 Thud 2,310 2.310 4,620 6,930 6.930 $34.650 $11,550.00 Fourth 0 0 0 0 0 $Q 50.00 Fifth 0 0 0 Q 0 $0 50.00 Sixth a 0 0 0 0 $0 s0.00 TOTALS 6,930 6,930 13,860 Volume discount if purchased all togetht S29,106.00 (not including shipping or applicable taxes) 6.11 lbstcy Oxidant Aramark G50 Reg en0x design saproNe holspols Apr 10.xls. C131201❑ ATTACHMENT E INJECTION PROCEDURE AN❑ EQUIPMENT ATTACHMENT E INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT 1.0 Construction Plans and Materials The injection project will target saprolite between 5 and approximately 22 feet below grade in an area approximately 1,800 square feet (ft2) The target remediation area is shown in orange on the attached figure. it is expected that eighteen DPT borings will be advanced (1 boring per each 100 ft), Injectants will be pumped under pressure into the subsurface through DPT rods. 2.0 Operation Procedures DPT borings will be advanced in the indicated treatment area. The borings will be advanced to DPT refusal. Injectants will be pumped under pressure into the subsurface through DPT rods. A flow meter will be used to monitor the injection rate. It is anticipated that between 250 and 350 gallons of solution will be injected into each of the eighteen borings. 3.0 Detailed Diagram of the Surface and Subsurface Portions of the System This section is not applicable to the proposed DPT injection activities. 4.0 Planned Injection Schedule It is anticipated that the first injection event will occur within 30 days of receiving an injection permit. The second event is expected to occur 3 to 8 weeks after completion of the first event. The third event is expected to occur 3 to 8 weeks after completion of the second event but no sooner than October 1, 2010. The third event is scheduled for after October 1, 2010 because of budget restrictions for ARAMARK's fiscal year which ends September 30. 2010. PROPOSED INJECTION TREATMENT AREA IS SHOWN IN ORANGE e, VE-6 0-0 MW—uo�e W-2B MW� 4B 4A� 11.82W-2A VE_ q82 **K EA AREA oM\ W— (EVE-7) \ 2.78 �\/�• 3 � 204 SOUTHER 32..:_ VIV� �{`� .o pQ�4 � REALTY = L� -R W (VE — MW-3A MW-3B.0 - PRor cE rioNW—gB vV�B W_8A sERvicEs 0 MW-9A ATTACHMENT F MONITORING PLAN ATTACHMENT F MONITORING PLAN 1.0 List of Existing and Proposed Monitoring Wells To Be Monitored Nesco Environmental proposes that monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-4A, MW- 4B, MW-7A, MW-7B, MW-8B, MW-9A, and MW-9B be monitored for VOCs, iron, silicon. sodium, silica, and carbonate immediately prior to injection events and approximately six months following the proposed third and final injection event. Nesco Environmental proposes that geochemical parameters be monitored using field equipment in monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-4A, MW-4B, MW-7A. MW-76, MW-88, MW-9A, and MW-9B prior to each of the three proposed injection event and approximately two weeks after each of the three proposed injection event. The geochemical parameters will include temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, and pH. The parameters will be measured by lowering the probe of a multi - parameter device into the screened section of each well. Nesco Environmental is certified by NCDENR as a field laboratory for these parameters. A copy of Nesco Environmental NCEDENR laboratory certificate is attached. Nesco Environmental proposes that soil borings be advanced and sampled approximately one month after injection activities have been completed. Nesco Environmental proposes that a total four borings be advanced by direct -push techniques (DPT). Nesco Environmental recommends that these borings be advanced to ❑PT refusal. Nesco Environmental recommends that samples be collected and screened with a photo - ionization detector (PID) at approximately 5-foot intervals. Nesco Environmental proposes that one boring be advanced immediately adjacent to the location of Boring A (advanced on March 4, 2010) and another boring be advanced immediately adjacent to the location of Boring G (also advanced on March 4, 2010). Borings A and G represent the 'worst case" conditions noted during the pre -injection evaluation performed in March 2010. Nesco Environmental proposes that samples be collected from these two borings at approximately the same depths at which the "worst case" conditions were noted for Borings A & G and that these samples be analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)_ Nesco Environmental proposes that two other borings be advanced at locations between five and ten feet from Regenox injection points. Nesco Environmental proposes that a sample be selected from each of these two boring on the basis of the highest PI❑ measurement for each boring. Nesco Environmental proposes that these samples be analyzed for VOCs. Nesco Environmental currently monitors CVOCs in the exhaust of the SVE system on a quarterly basis. Nesco Environmental proposes that the SVE system be deactivated during injection activities and during the active remediation period of RegenOx (3 to 4 weeks after activation). Nesco Environmental proposes to restart the SVE system after the active remediation period and to collect samples of the exhaust for CVOC analyses on the existing schedule. 2.0 List of Monitoring Parameters and Analytical Methods VOCs — EPA Method 8260 Iron — Standard Method 6010 or EPA Method 200.7 Silicon - Standard Method 6010 or EPA Method 200.7 Sodium - Standard Method 6010 or EPA Method 200.7 Silica - Standard Method 6010 or EPA Method 200.7 Carbonate - Standard Method 2320B. Temperature — Standard Method 2550E Dissolved Oxygen - Standard Method 4500 0 C pH - Standard Method 4500 H B Oxidation -Reduction Potential Standard Method 2580 B CVOCs in Vapor — Microseeps AM4.02 3.0 Schedule for Sampling to Monitor the Proposed Injection Nesco Environmental proposes that ground water be monitored for VOCs, iron, silicon, sodium, silica, and carbonate be performed immediately prior to injection events and approximately six months following the proposed third and final injection event. Nesco Environmental proposes that ground water geochemical parameters be monitored prior to each of the three proposed injection events and approximately two weeks after each of the three proposed injection events Nesco Environmental proposes that soil borings be advanced and sampled approximately one month after injection activities have been completed. Nesco Environmental proposed that CVOCs in the SVE system exhaust continue to be monitored quarterly each January, April, July, and October. ATTACHMENT F MONITORING PLAN 1.0 List ofVxisting and Proposed Monitoring Wells To Be Monitored Ground wa\Correc ing is currently performed on an annual ?oasis eZ-413, October. Samples are collecnitoring wells MW-28, MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-4A, MW-7 A, MW-?B, MW-$BW-9B, MW-10C, MW-11C, MW-12C, MW-14B MW-14G, MW- 15B, MW-15C anzed for volatile ❑rganic compounds by EP Methods 8260 in accordance with ta Action Plan which was previously ap roved by NCDENR. Nesco Environmens keep this schedule for the purposes f monitoring the effects of the injection acti Nesco Environmental propose that geochemical Fent. tens be monitored using field equipment in monitoring wells MW-28, M -3A, MW-3B, MMW-4B prior to each injection event and approximately two weeks after ch injectionThe geochemical parameters will include temperature, dissolved oxygen, i parameters will be measured by lowering the screened section of each well. Nesco Envirc laboratory for these parameters. A copy certificate is attached. i-reduction potential, and pH. The of a multi -parameter device into the I is certified by NCDENR as a field Environmental NCEDENR laboratory Nesco Environment/thective nitors GVOCs in th exhaust of the SVE system on a quarterly basis. Nesco Enroposes that the SV system be deactivated during injection activities and duriremediation period of genOx (3 to 4 weeks after activation}. Nesco Enviroses to restart the SV system after the active remediation period and to s of the exhaust for CVOC alyses on the existing schedule. � 2.0 List of Monitoring Parameters and Analytical Methods VOCs — A Method 8260 Temper, ture — Standard Method 2550B Di55o ed Oxygen - Standard Method 4500 0 C pH tandard Method 4500 H B O dation-Reduction Potential Standard Method 2580 B jtVOCS in Vapor — Microseeps AM4.02 46 ,.J 3.0 Schedule for Sampling to Monitor the Proposed Injection Nesco Environmental proposes that ground water be monitored for VOCs on its regular annual schedule in ❑ctobef 2010. Nesco Environmental expects that an injection event will occur during the first half of October 2010 and the monitoring event will occur during the second half of October 2010. Nesco Environmental propo\�Ips that geochemical parameters be monitored using field equipment in monitoring wells MW-213',11VI IV-3A, MW-3B, MVV-4A, MW-48,Orior to each injection event and approximately two weeks aft4, each injection event. Nesco Environmental proposes that tqe exhaust from theAVE system be monitored for CVOCs on its regular quarterly schedule in Jul�,and October 410. M STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND NA TURA[ RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM In accordance with the provisions of NX.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) fl). 143-215.3 {a)(10) and NCAC 2H-0800: NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC is trereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment 1 and report mon+tonng data to DWO for complpaoce wifh NPOES effluent surface water groundwater and pretreafinenf regulations 9y reference I SA NCA C 2H 0800 is made a part of this certificate This certificate does rrof guarantee validity of data generated. bur indreafes the methodology equipment qualify control proc ediire s records and proticierwy of the laboratory have been examined and tound to be acceptable This [:erti5cate shall be valid until December -3�311-2li010 Certibcate No 5562 C� �v Par Uonne)ly Attachment I North Carolina WastewaterlGroundwater Laboratory Certffication Certified Parameters Listing Lab Name: Nesco Environmental. PLLC Certificate Number, 5552 Address. PO Box 78222 Effective Date 01/0,12010 Charlotte. NO 28271- Expiration pate. 12/31/2010 Date of Last Amendment. 02/22/2010 The above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below CERTIFIED PARAMETERS INORGANICS DISSOLVED OXYGEN Std Method 4500 0 G pH Std Method 4500 H B TEMPERATURE Std Method 2550E This Certification requires mat irance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved meth odofogy, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Laboratories are subject to civil penalties andlor decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 2H.0807 Attachment I North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Certified Pararrmeters Listing Lab flame Nesco Environments. PLLC Certificate Number 5562 Address PO Box 78222 Effective Date 01 t0112010 Chanotte, NC 28271- Expiration Date 12/31/2010 date of Last Amendrnem Toe xDove named Iaboraklry rkav mg ouly M!1 Ire requirements o' 1SA NCAC 2H 08W is neretrpr ceriXed tpr W mess cerement of the parameters Iis1e4 fear CERTIFIED PARAMETERS INORGANICS DISSOLVED OXYGEN Sid Method 4500 0 C pN Sid McM00 4500 H S TEMPERATURE Stp method 25506 This certification ripures marntance of an acceptahie qua;,ry aa�'uranee program use 0 approveQ rnC:hotlo�ogv ano saHsfacwry pe1wrnance oFi evaijai ion Sa'"as Latwra•.orres are subiW ID civil Pena ties a►rolor oecerhhcahori for 1'?raCPCRS as set roV in 15A NCAC 2H 080t ATTACHMENT G WELL ❑ATA ATTACHMENT G WELL DATA Attached is summary of well construction for project monitoring wells. Monitoring wells MW-1A, MW-2A, MW-6A, MW-6B. MVV-7A. MW-7B, MW-8A, MW13A, MW-14A, MW-15A, MW- 16A. MW-16B, MW-16C, MW-17A, MW-17B, and MVV-17C have been abandoned in accordance with state well construction regulations (Well abandonment records are available if req uested. ) Attached are well construction records for the following recovery wells: RW-1 and RW-2. It should be noted that recovery well RW-1 also serves as vapor extraction point VE-1 and recovery well RW-2 also serves as vapor extraction point VE-7. Attached are well construction records for the following vapor extraction wells and vapor monitoring wells: VE-1, VE-2. VE-3, VE-4, VE-5. VE-6. VE-7, VM-1. and VM-2. It should be noted that recovery well RW-1 also serves as vapor extraction point VE-1 and recovery well RW-2 also serves as vapor extraction point VE-7. TABLE 5 MONfTMNG WEi1 Co14STf ucnoN DATA' :: iti-6f1 Hems Refef6ficb�' Biava3ion C4rormr�' �`u1.lifhGA E#eva'rort c�e�` �... Weft fit'. NT4!!{ Lergth �iAG�1C ik�t Top Bottom MW-1 A 773.90 774.1 40.0 10.0 741.1 734.1 Mafrc saprolde MW-2A 772.42 770.3 31.0 10.0 749.3 739.3 Mafic Wrolrte MW-2B 770.72 770.3 41.0 5.0 734.3 729.3 Bedrock MW-3A 773.50 772.0 36.0 10.0 746.0 736,0 Felaic aaproiite MW3B 774.28 772.2 48.5 5.0 728.7 723.7 Transition IonelBedresk. MW-4A 774.70 772.2 30.0 10.0 752,2 742.2 Felaic Wrolite MW-4B 773,81 772.2 43.5 5.0 733.7 728.7 Transition zone/Bedrock MW-$A 773.89 773.7 25.0 10.0 758.7 748.7 Felaic sapmlite MW-5B 773.52 773.6 43.0 5.0 735.6 730.6 Transition zone/Bedrock MW-6A 774.19 774,0 26 0 MO 758.0 748.0 Felaic saprol" MW-5B 773.94 774.1 39.0 5.0 740.1 735.1 Transition zone/Bedrock MW-7A 765.37 765.5 23.0 10.0 752.5 742.5 Felaic saprolite MW-78 765.31 765.5 41.0 5-0 729.5 724.5 Transition zone MW$A 761,92 762.0 23.0 10.0 749.0 739.0 Mafic aeprolite MW$B 761.92 761.9 39.0 5.0 727.9 722.9 Transition zonelSedrock MW-SA 759.45 759.6 26.0 10.D 743.6 733.6 Medic and telsic sap►olde MW-98 759.43 759.8 77.0 5.0 687.8 682.8 Transition zonelBedrock MW-1OA 758.48 758.4 20.0 10.0 748.4 738.4 SaproRe MW-10B 758.58 758.9 97.0 5.0 666.9 661.9 Transition zone MW-10C 759.12 759.3 113.0 5.0 651.3 648.3 Bedrock MW-11A 758.48 757.6 25.5 10.0 742.6 732.E 5aprolite NMI B 757.92 758.2 90.0 5.0 6732 668.2 Transition zone MW-11 C 757.38 757.9 110.0 5.0 652.9 647.9 Bedrock MW-12A 750.70 751.1 26.0 10.0 736.1 726.1 5aprolite MW-12B 750.65 750.8 81.0 5.0 674.8 669.8 Transition zone MW-12C 750.65 750.9 112.0 5.0 645.9 640.9 Bedtock MW-13A 771.40 T71.2 29.0 10.0 752.6 742.6 5aproho MW-14A 739.88 740.0 11.5 7.0 736.0 728.5 Alluvium MW-14Ba 739.76 739.8 34.5 7.5 712.8 705.3 Transition zone MW-14Ca 739.76 739.8 100.0 7.5 647.3 639.8 Bedrock 120M.14 0000.FITG:arwn=I : TABLE 5 (COt+iMUED) MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA' Gco issd3 L?a (� . W4 Swavned $' SriaF +r+e Wvi# >seteteee. Surfacs c#:`` If; ` 8raaaad Qeoiogia INama 0evabon .. Elevation Wfl��'?.`< ': Length .. Top Gott m i.i* MW-15A 743-20 743-2 16,0 10.0 737.0 727.2 Saprolite MW-15e 743,26 743.2 42.5 4.5 705-2 700.7 Bedrock MW-15C6 743,28 743.2 90.0 C5 657.7 653.2 Bedrock MW-16A 740.59 740.6 17.5 10,0 733.0 723.1 Saprol"IFiil MW-16e 740.66 740.6 39.7 7.5 708A 700.9 SaprolitelTransi ion zone MW-16Cg 740.66 740.6 104.2 C5 640.9 BWA Bedrock MW-17A 745,51 745.8 2D,O 10.0 736.0 725.8 Saprolite MW-1766 745.88 745.8 94-5 7-5 660.0 651.3 L Transition zone MW-17Ce 745.88 746.8 126.0 8.5 628.0 619.8 Bedrock NOTES ' Alf dimensions shown in feet. ` Reference elevation is top of 2-inch well casing with the exception of MW-143, MW-14C, MW-15B, MW-15C, MW-16B, MW-16C, MW-178. and MW-17C, where the reference elevation is the top of the flush -mount rim. 3 Elevations all expressed in feet above mean sea level. 4 Wells surveyed by The Summit Group, formerty Holleman-Trulove Engineering, InC- 5 Depth of well measured from Around surface. 6 Monhoting points MW-14B, MW-14C, MW15B, MW-15C, MW16B, VW-16C, MW17B, and MW17C are zones within mull -level samplers. The installation and design of the multi -level samplers is discussed in Appendix A. 12045.14 0000 RTra J Rmmn t -t RMT REPORT OCTOBER 1992 ARATEX SERVICES, INC. FINAL APPENDIX D MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DEPTH_(FT.) . 'I r - . 48 ft. FRACTUREQ BEDROC WELL CASING 4 inch steel— - CONCRETE PAD BOREHOLE 12 inch diomete r `! -■•-• . .. - BENTONITE SEAL Hydrated , 1 /} inch pellets ! / / ■ a[aim SAND PACK R,Z20 silica snnr_ SAND PACK 70 /60 silirn--Rnnel BOREHOLE inch diameter RECOVERY WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM Not To Scale PROJECT ARATEX — GREENSBO RO NORTH CARaI INA PROJECT NO. _ 190n-r)-04 WELL NO. Rw i DATE INSTALLED , 3f i3 f97 DRILLING CONTRACTOR. GRVATER PROTECTION, INC. RMT GEOLOGIST_ L_ Mr-GAN_ �m DEPTH (FT.) 3 ft_ 5 ft - CONCRETE PAD WELL CASING 4 inch diamCter_ stainless steel BENTONITE SEAL HydTpellets and SAND PACK 90/U- WELL SCREEN Stninlprc gtPPI G 01 Q inch slat VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL DIAGRAM Not To Scale PROJECTAEX — GREENSEMR0, NORTH CAE?01 INA PROJECT NO. 12005 04 WELL NO. — - DATE INSTALLED 1411-Z92 DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUNDWATER PROTECTION, INC__ RIFT GEOLOGIST �I DEPTH _{FT.} CONCRETE PAD WELL CASING d inrh diameter__ stainless steel BENTONITE SEAL Hydrated pellets ❑nd chins BOREHOLE 10 1/4 inch diometer SAND PACK 90160 ,i3i -n sand WELL SCREEN StninlPcc ctapL f}10 inch slat VAPOR_-EXTRACROU - WfLL DIAGRAM Not To Scala PROJECT. ARATEX RGREENSBORO_ NORTH CARM INA -- PROJECT NO. 12005.04 WELL NO. V -3 _ DATE INSTALLED -1/Q¢f 92 DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUNDWATER PROTECTION, INC RMT GEOLOGIST I McGAN �m DEPTH _(FT.) J 5.5 ft. 6.0 ft. 7.0 ft, 6" DIA. FLUSHMOUNT SURFACE PROTECTIVE CASING CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL 8" DIAMETER BOREHOLE 1" DIA. SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE (FLUSH - THREADED WITH O-RINGS) HYDRATED BENTONiTE CHIP SEAL 8/20 SILICA SAND 0.020" SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN HYDRATED BENTONITE CHIP SEAL _ 10.5- tt. -- - - - - - 8/20 SILICA SAND 1 1.0 ft. 12.0 it. 0.020" SLOTTED PVC 125fit. WELL SCREEN SOIL VACUUM MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL Not To Scale PROJECT ARATEX - GREENSIBORD, NORTH CAROL INA PROJECT NO. 12005 Oa - WELL NO.vm-1 DATE INSTALLED 3JOf�� DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUNDWATER P-R=TION. INC_ RMT GEOLOGIST - - L-_ Mr-r-AN - =. DEPTH (FT.) SINEW=in III I 1 -❑ ft- - - C l___ 6" DIA. FLUSHMOUNT SURFACE PROTECTIVE CASING CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL 8" DIAMETER BOREHOLE 1" DIA. SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE (FLUSH - THREADED WITH O-RINGS) HYDRATED BENTONiTE CHIP SEAL 5.5 ft, _. 6.0 ft. 7.0 -ft_ 8/20 SILICA SAND 8.5 ft. I `- 0.020" SLOTTED PVC HWELL SCREEN HYDRATED BENT(-NITE CHIP SEAL - L0.0 ft.--- -- 8/20 SILICA SAND ] 1.ft. 12.0 ft, - 0.020" SLOTTED PVC 12.5 ft_ WELL SCREEN SOIL VACUUM MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL Not To Scale PROJECT ARATEX - GREENSIBORD, NORTH CAR01 INA PROJECT NO. 1 2[} -5 04 WELL NO. um-2— DATE INSTALLED _ 3zQ3,f-q2 DRILLING CONTRACTOR RMT GEOLOGIST 1 Mrf',AN North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section P.O. Box 29535 - Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733.3221 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Q=rdwrber Pxtltefiai Inc. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY OUAD. NO. SERIAL NO - Let. Long. Minor Basin Basin Cade Header Eni. STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1105 PERMIT NUMBER: 40-0836_;+kA30 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: Greffsbom County: Gl lam (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) DEPTH 2. OWNER Aram Services From To ADDRESS 1834 WUj:kn Office Sq., S.ti.tie 450 35.01 46.01 (Street or Route No.) 96.01 47.5; 9juladirg IL 60173 City or Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 3-13-92 USE OF WELL Mx tOrIN 4. TOTAL DEPTH 48•0 feet. 5. CUTTINGS COLLECTED YES[j] NO❑ B. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NOD 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing; FT. fuse '*'it Above Top of Casing) 8, TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 .- FT. Above Land Surface` ' Casing Terminated aVor below land surlave Is Illegal unless a varlance is Issued in accordance wish 15A NCAC 2C .0118 9. YIELD (gprn): NA METHOD OF TEST M 10. WATER ZONES (depth): NA RO GW-I Ent DRILLING LOG Formation Description Saga. WM412 red Rxk' Silts Wit Bilk Grardte .1. CHLORINATION, Type NA Amount Ate if additional space is needed use back of form 12. CASING: Wall Thickness LOCATION SKETCH Depth Diameter or Weight'Ft. Material (Show direction and distance from at leas! two State From 0.0 To - R-0- Ft. 4,01, s:h• 40 R - Roads, or other map reference points) From To Ft. From To Ft. 13. GROUT: Depth Material Method �^ From 0.0 To _ 4.0 Ft. Rxt From To Ft. 14. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 18.0 _ To 48.0 Ft 4.0 in, .010 in. SS From M To 0 __ Ft. 4.0 in. •010 in, SS From To Ft. in, in. 15. SAND/GRAVEL PACK. Depth Size Material From 118-0 To 48.0- Ft. 20=0_ Fim Silica Swd From 6.0 To 18.0 Ft. 20-60 Fine S;i;al Sdi1d 16. REMARKS: RnL-1, _Bmtalite let § fret( 4.0 tO 15.0 feet. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1SA NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT/ GWA REV. 9M Submit"inal to Division of ErMrorxnental nagement and copy to well owner. -� > iL- DATE North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Sectior P.O. Sox 29535 . Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733.3221 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD FOR OFFICE USE ONLY QUAD. NO. SERIAL NO. minor Basin DRILLING CONTRACTOR: meter Pratectirn Inc- Header Ent STATE'. WELL CONSTRUCTION DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1105 PERMIT NUMBER: 4 1. WELL LOCATION: (Shows sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: 13mmshon County: (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) DEPTH 2. OWNER Ardtex SmdcEs From To ADDRESS 0.0_ 5"01 (street or Route No) 5.0' 13. ' SI-Orrh=' IL 13.0' 18 A' City or Town -state Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 3A=92 USE OF WELL 4. TOTAL DEPTH 17.0 feet_ 5. CUTTINGS COLLECTED YES ❑ NOS] 6. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO® 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 23.0 FT. (Use "+' if Above Top of Casing) S. TOP OF CASING IS, 2_0 FT- Above Land Surface - Casino terminated atfor below land surface Is Illegal unless a variance Is issued In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .4110 9. YIELD (gpm); 7a — METHOD OF TEST NA 10. WATER ZONES (depth) NA DRILLING LOG Formation Description Gin' n t GtY Cam, SI 11. CHLORINATION: Type NA�—Amount AaIf additional space is needed use back of form 12. CASING: Wait Thickness LOCATION SKETCH Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material (Show direction and distance from at least two State From 0.0 To — -0 Ft. 4_00 SS - - ENC Roads, or other map reference points) From To Ft. From To Ft. 13. GROUT: Depth Material Method From 0.0 To 3.0 Ft. Pttrtl-amd B2rrtatitR S1imay ) From To Ft. �HJ 14. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slat Size Material From 7.0 To 17_0 Ft 4-❑ in. _010 _ in. - S From To Ft. in. in. From To Ft. in. in. 15. SAND/GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material From 5.0 To _17 Q Ft. From To Ft. �_ 16. REMARKS: I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCE❑ IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS SEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENfDATE GW-1 REV. 9191 Submit original to Division of Envirionmentalklanagement and copy to well owner. North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section P.O. Box 29535 - Raleigh, N.G. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733.3221 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CKIAID.. No. SERIAL NO. Lat, Lora.=' R0 It1i110i easin DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Groxdwater apt:@2tja t Ir]C. STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1105 PERMIT NUMBER: 40-OBE.. �.71 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show Sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: -- Mab= --. _ County: (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) 2. OWNER ArabEX Sevier ADDRESS_ 1a34 %Idlm Mice 93., suite 450 (Street or Route No.) sdud=191 IL 60173 City or Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED _ 3.3:vSQ USE OF WELL IWX 4. TOTAL DEPTH 37_1) feet_ 5. CUTTINGS COLLECTED YES ❑ NO© 6. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO[j] 7, STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: d.D FT. (Use'+" if Above Top of Casing) 8. TOP OF CASING IS Q_0- FT. Above Land Surface' ' Casing Terminated avor below Iand surface is Illegal unless a Variance Is Issued In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0116 9. YIELD (gpm): N& METHOD OF TEST NA 10. WATER ZONES (depth): Ik 11. CHLORINATION: Type hZ Amount UL 12. CASING: Wall Thickness Depth Diameter or Weights, Material From 0.0 To 11 A Ft. 1.0" Sth. 4D PVC From 0.0 To 6_0 Ft. --1.011 3:h- 40 PW_ DEPTH From To 0.0, 12.0, Ent -DRILLING LOG Formation Description Ekm Tart Silt If additional space is needed use back of form LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or other map reference points) From To Ft. 13. GROUT: Depth Material Method From 0.0 To QQ - Ft. From To Ft. 14. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 11 0 To 1? 0 Ft --] -0 in. -020_ in. aC From 6_0 To 7.0 Ft. 1.0 in. 0Z in. PW � From Tv Ft. in. in. `!* 15. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: fit, Depth Size Material 11 From 1025 To 19X Ft. B-11 From 54 To 7.0 Ft. 8-20 ODUM SL ire 1- 1015— I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. ,?//I GW-1 REV. %91 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR ORfGENT Submit ongiruJ to Division of Ernnronmentat Management and copy to well owner. North Carolina . Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section P.O. Box 29535 - Raleigh, N.C. 27625-0535 Phone (919)733.3221 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRILLING CONTRACTOR: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY QUAD. NW SERIAL NO. " Lem, FiD lulinarBesin - - Bamirt{:ads . Header' Ent GW-1 Ent STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1105 PERMIT NUMBER: 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: GmEnsbom County: Q1i 1 fCVd (Road. Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) 2. OWNER kabet: SeryiCeS ADDRESS_......1&34 Waldria Office Saxe, Suite 450 (Street or Route No.) 1I— fi0173 City or Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 3­3-q? USE OF WELL 1 4. TOTAL DEPTH 19.0 fee- 5. CUTTINGS COLLECTED YES Q NO[j] S. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES[] NOQ 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: non FT. (Use'+' if Above Top of Casing) 8. TOP OF CASING IS _ 0-0 FT. Above Land Surface' ' Casing Terminated atlor below land surface is Illegal untesa a variance Is issued in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118 9. YIELD (gpm): to METHOD OF TEST 10. WATER ZONES (depth): Ala 11. CHLORINATION: Type 12. CASING: Depth Diameter Fromm —To 11 -0- Ft. 1 -0!' From 0-0 To---E-0- Ft.- 1-02 From —To Ft. 13. GROUT: Depth From To Ft From To Ft 14. SCREEN. DEPTH From To 0.0' 12.0' DRILLING LOG Formation Description Bm T3n Smdy Silt Amount NA It additional space is needed use back of form Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. Material .R-h- AD per_ Sc,_ an — _sr_ Material Method Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From j i o To - m Ft 1.0 in. .0_ in. 0C From �n To 7 0 Ft.1_ in. .O in. Pic From To Ft, in. in. 15. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or other map reference points) I L � From 105__ To 19-0 Ft. 8=20 CIcanae Si ica From 5.5 To 7.0 Ft. &-20 16. REMARKS' 2, Fbntmite pwiets grry++ 7 r5 to y(] S foe I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. ?/!',/f • SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGEjft BATE GW-1 REV. 9A1 Submit original to Division of Environmentl Management and copy to well owner. North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management • Groundwater Section R.D. Box 29535 . Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733-3221 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Amterf' Inc_ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY QUAD: NO. SERIAL NO, tAIL fors¢. F10 li 11W Bash+ Nsadw Ent GW-1 Ent STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1105 PERMIT NUMBER: 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: ,-GOMEt1County: r; I 5—=d- (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) DEPTH 2. OWNER _ _= 4""icm From To ADDRESS 1834 �,bldei OffiCe 9J., State 450 0.0' 5.0' _ (Street or Route No.) 5.0' 13.0' 'loan � Z9 IL 60173 - 13.b 1$.0 ' City or Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 3=4A2 USE OF WELL _ 4. TOTAL DEPTH »17-0 PmF- 5. CUTTINGS COLLECTED YES ❑ NO[Z' -- 6. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO[j 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 23,0 Fr. (Use '+" if Above Top of Casing) 8. TOP OF CASING IS _ 2-0 FT- Above Land Surface` ' Casing Terminated atlor below land surface Is Illegal unless a variance is Issued In accordance with 15A HCAC 2C .0118 9. YIELD (gpm):h_ METHOD OF TEST to 10. WATER ZONES (depth): - ba -- _ DRILLING LOG Formation Description ta-dw ffit Cry SA SI CL r.pm 0M a[ _CL GM ift Gry C-, SE 11. CHLORINATION: Type Amount IsM If additional space is needed use back of form 12. CASING: Wall Thickness LOCATION SKETCH Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material (Show direction and distance from at least two State From - 0-0 To -.- Ft. 4-al s -- Pic: — Roads, or other map reference points) From To Ft. From —To— Ft. 13. GROUT: Depth Material Method Frnm 0.0 To 3.0 Ft. Iort and BfftaIte g ��]] From To Ft. 14. SCREEN: ` Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 77 o __ To _17.0 Ft ._._4-0 in. •010 in. SS From To Ft. in_ in. From To Ft. in. in. 4 15. SAND/GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material ' From 5.0 To 17-.Q_ Ft. 23-60 Firm Rilirn Syd i `] - 8S From To Ft. 16. REMARKS: I DO HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. Mf//'! . SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OPFAGENT GWA REV. SA I Submit original 10 Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. 12INCHES GRADE GROUt 4-INCH 0 SGH-40 PVC WELL CASING 2.0 FEET BENTONITE 4.0 FEET 5.0 FEET 4-INCH 0 SCH 40 PVC WELL SCREEN 0.020-INCH SLOTS 15.0 Fc=: NOT TO SCALE PO Box 78222 CHARLOTTE, NC 28271 FIGURE 704-442-1365 P-0155 22.5 FEET SCHEMATIC DRAWING VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL VE-4 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA GRAVE GROUT 4-INCH O SCH 40 PVC WELL CASING 2.0 FEET i _ 6ENTONFrE 4,0 FEET 5.0 FEET 4-INCH 0 SC 40 PVC WELL SCREEN 0.020-INCH SLOTS 15.0 FEET NOT TO SCALE PO BOX 78222 FIGURE CHARLOTTE, INC 28271 704- 42-5365 P-01 55 20.0 FEET SCHEMATIC DRAWING 1t INCHES VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL VE-6 ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL. LLC 509 TEAG U E STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA GRADE GROUT 4-INCH 0 SCH 40 PVC WELL CASING 2.0 FEET BENTONITE 4.0 FEET 5.0 FEET 4-INCH 0 SCH 40 PVC WELL SCREEN 0.020•INCH SLOTS NOT TO SCALE PO BOX 78222 FIGURE CHARLOTTE, NC 28271 704-442-1365 P-0155 SCHEMATIC DRAWING VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL VE-5 ANCHES ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA GRADE GROUT 6-INCH © STAINLESS STEEL WELL CASING 3.0 FEET 3-�NTONITE 5.5 FEET 7.0 FEET 6-1NCH 4 STAINLESS STEEL WELL SCREEN 0.0204NCH WIRE -WRAP. CONTINUOUS SLOTS FROM 7 TO 17 FEET 52.0 FEET 6-INCH 0 STAINLESS STEEL WELL SCREEN 0.010-INCH WIRE -WRAP. CONTINUOUS SLOTS FROM 17 TO 52 FEET 52.0 FEET NOT TO SCALE PO BOX 78222 MUM FIGURE CHARLOTTE, NC 28271 704-442-1365 P-0155 52.0 FEET SCHEMATIC DRAWING RECOVERY WELL RW-2 - VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL VE-7 I'll '21hCHES ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA ATTACHMENT H MAPS ATTACHMENT H MAPS 1.0 Area Map Based on the Most Recent USGS 7.5' Topographic Map of the Area, at a Scale of 1:24,000 and Showing the Location of the Proposed Injection Site A figure which includes an excerpt of the Greensboro. NC 7-5-minute USGS quadrangle is attached. The map was originally prepared in 1951 and was updated in 1994. The proposed injection location is shown on the map. This map also shows surface waters located within one - quarter mile of the subject site. 2.0 Site Map A site map is attached which shows the site property boundaries, buildings and other pertinent structures, existing monitoring wells. abandoned monitoring wells, vapor extraction wells, and vapor monitoring wells. Documented petroleum releases have occurred at several sites shown on the site map including the former Exxon Station located at the corner of Randleman Road and Teague Street, Kangaroo Mart located at the corner of Randleman and Creek Ridge Roads, and the 8P Station located at the corner of Randleman and Creek Ridge Roads. 3.0 Potentiometric Surface Maps A potentiometric surface map for the shallow unconfined water -bearing (water table) unit is attached. This map is based on data collected on September 26, 1994 before most of the shallow water table monitoring wells were abandoned. This map shows that the shallow ground water flow is towards Ryan Creek located southeast of the subject site. Another potentiometric surface map based on data from transition zone wells is attached. This map is based on data collected on October 28, 2009. This map shows that the ground water flow is towards Ryan Creek located southeast of the subject site. 4.0 Contaminant Flume Maps An isoconcentration map for the shallow unconfined water -bearing (water table) unit is attached. This map is based on data collected in September 1994 before most of the shallow water table monitoring wells were abandoned. Another isoconcentration map based on data from transition zone wells is attached. This reap is based on data collected in October 2009. A third isoconcentration map based on data from bedrock wells is attached. This reap is based on data collected in October 2909. 5.0 Cross Sections Cross sections from the 1994 CSA report are attached. Nesco Environmental annotated cross section A -A' to show the approximate location of ❑PT drilling and injection points. AZA HCDENR Nortri Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Duality Beverly Eaves °erduc- Coleen H. Sullins DpE- Freeman Gaverw Director 5ecretaru October 13, 2010 Doue Heimstetler Senior Director, Environmental Compliance and Sustainability AR.AMARK Uniform and Career Apparel. LLC 115 North First Street Burbank. CA 91502 Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC Dear Mr. Helmstetler: In accordance with the application received on June 3. 2010. and additional information received August 26. 2010. we are forwarding permit number WI0400140, This permit is to inject RegenOx to remediate groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents at the ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC facility located 509 Teauge Street. Greensboro, Guilford County, NC 27406. This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30. 2012. and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit. Please note that the monitoring plan as originally presented in the application has been modified per the Additional Information Letter dated August 24, 2016, and received by the Division of Water Quality on August 26. 2010. You will need to notify this office and the Winston-Salem Regional Office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at 919-715-6166 or Michael.Rogers(u.ncdenr.gnv if you have any questions about your permit. Best Regards, Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL) Environmental Specialist Underground Injection Control Program cc: Sherri Knight - Winston-Salem Regional Office Joseph P. Nestor - NESCO Environmental, PLLC W10400140 Permit File Gene Mao - Guilford County Environmental health Department 163s Mad Service i, enter_ Rafegh Nag1 Carnim , 276994VF? _oc3toor ' " 8 '-anital boulevare. Rate,gn. NDO Gamlina 276D4 [ it c pmone 9'�.-s% 322'1 1 FhX ' 9t? -?15 t)��fl FAY 2 91S-715.6N6 Customer Service '� 3+7-5M-F4i Inie"t'wuna n=ateMLiaKv.om N0ii7hCai-L)11 is Eauai vpunnun+�t �fnrmaory cum E*rtv�rv• e V i tural'al` ATTACHMENT C INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION The fluid to be injected will be a solution of water and RegenOx. RegenOx is manufactured and distributed by Regenesis. RegenOx is on NCDENR's list of approved substances for remediation injectants. RegenOx maximizes in situ performance using a solid alkaline oxidant that employs a sodium percarbonate complex with multi -part catalytic formula. The product is delivered as two parts that are combined and injected into the subsurface using common drilling or direct -push equipment. Once in the subsurface, the combined product produces an effective oxidation reaction comparable to that of Fenton's Reagent without a violent exothermic reaction. RegenOx safely, effectively and rapidly destroys a wide range of contaminants in both soil and groundwater Attached are promotional literatures from Regenesis and MSDSs for RegenOx Part A and RegenOx Part B. These documents describe the physical, biological and radiological characteristics of the injectant. 7VW TM Regen[� CHEMICAL OXIDATION REDEFINED... RegenOx" is an advanced in situ chemical oxidation technology* designed to treat organic contaminants including high concentration source areas in the saturated and vadose zones PRODUCT FEATURES: ■ Rapid and sustained oxidation of target compounds • Easily applied with readily available equipment • Destroys a broad range of contaminants ■ More efficient than other solid oxidants • Enhances subsequent bioremediation • Avoids detrimental impacts to groundwater aquifers RegenOx pro"appficarion HOW IT WORKS: RegenOx maximizes in situ performance using a solid alkaline oxidant that employs a sodium percarbonate complex with a multi -part catalytic formula. The product is delivered as two parts that are combined and injected into the subsurface using common drilling or direct -push equipment. Once in the subsurface, the combined product produces an effective oxidation reaction comparable to that of Fenton's Reagent without a violent exothermic reaction. RegenOx safely, effectively and rapidly destroys a wide range of contaminants in both soil and groundwater (Table 1). ACHIEVES RAPID OXIDATION VIA A NUMBER OF MECHANISMS RegenOx directly oxidizes contaminants while its unique catalytic complex generates a suite of highly charged, oxidative free radicals that are responsible for the rapid destruction of contaminants. The mechanisms by which RegenOx operates are: ■ Surface- Mediated Oxidation: (see Figure 1 and description below) • Direct Oxidation: C�Cl, + Z Na,CO, • 3 H2O, + 2 H2O 2CO, + 4 NaCI + 4 H2O + 2 H,CO, • Free Radical Oxidation: — Perhydroxyl Radical (HO:•) — Hydroxyl Radical (OH-) — Superoxide Radical (O,•) Figure 1. Surface -Mediated Oxidation is responsible for the majority of RegenOx contaminant destruction. This process takes place in two stages. First, the RegenOx activator complex coats the subsurface. Second, the oxidizer complex and contaminant react with the activator complex surface destroying the contaminant. . Patent applied for Figure 1. RegenOx" Surface -Mediated Oxidation .O - genm'" From Mass Reduction to Bioremediation: Regenox" is an effective and rapid contaminant mass reduction technology. A single injection will remove significant amounts of target contaminants from the subsurface. Strategies employing multiple Regenox injections coupled with follow-on accelerated Bioremediation can be used to treat highly contaminated sites to regulatory closure. In fact, Regenox was designed specifically to allow for a seamless transition to low-cost accelerated bioremediation using any of Regenesis controlled release compounds. Significant Longevity: Regenox has been shown to destroy contaminants for periods of up to one month. Product Application Made Safe and Easy: Regenox produces minimal heat and as with all oxidants proper health and safety procedures must be followed. The necessary safety guidance accompanies all shipments of Regenox and additional resources are available on request. Through the use of readily available, highly mobile, direct -push equipment and an array of pumps, Regenox has been designed to be as easy to install as other Regenesis products like ORC• and HRCO. Effective on a Wide Range of Contaminants: Regenox has been rigorously tested in both the laboratory and the field on petroleum hydrocarbons (aliphatics and aromatics), gasoline oxygenates (e.g., MTBE and TAME), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., naphthalene and phenanthrene) and chlorinated hydrocarbons (e.g-, PCE, TCE, TCA). Oxidant Effectiveness vs. Contaminant Type: Based on laboratory kinetic data, thermodynamic calculations, and literature reports. oxidant Effectiveness Key: A = Short half life, low free energy (most energetically favored), most complete B = Intermediate half life, low free energy, intermediate degree of completion C = Intermediate half life, intermediate free energy, low degree of completion ❑ = Lang half life, high free energy (least favored), very low degree of completion : 4 1 REGENESIS Advanced Technologies For Groundwater Resources 1011 Calle Som6ra r San Clemente. Lalifornw 9267.1-6244 Tel 949!366.8000 !Pax 949.366,8090 ! www regenesis.com Regen OX — Part A (Oxidizer Complex) Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Last Revised: November 7, 2005 Section I — Supplier Information and Material Identification Supplier: Ap REGENESIS 1011 Cal le Sombra San Clemente, CA 92673 Telephone: 949.3 66.8000 Fax: 949.366.8090 E-mail: info@regenesis.com Chemical Description: A mixture of sodium percarbonate [2Na2CO3.3H202], sodium carbonate [Na2C031, sodium silicate and silica gel. Chemical Family: inorganic Chemicals Trade Name: Regen Ox — Part A (Oxidizer Complex) Product Use: Used to remediate contaminated soil and groundwater (environmental applications) Section 2 — Chemical Information/Other Designations CAS No. Chemical 15630-89-4 Sodium Percarbonate 5968-11-6 Sodium Carbonate Monohydrate 1344-09-8 Silicic Acid, Sodium Salt, Sodium Silicate 63231-67-4 Silica Gel Section 3 — Physical Data Form: Powder Color: White Odor: Odorless Melting Point: NA Boiling Point: NA RegenOx — Part A Section 3 — Physical Data (cont) FlammabilitylFlash Point: NA Vapor Pressure: NA Bulk Density: 0.9 — 1.2 glcm3 Solubility: Min 14.5g1100g water @ 20 °C Viscosity: NA pH (3% solution): " 10.5 Decomposition Self -accelerating decomposition with oxygen release starts Temperature: at 50 °C. Section 4 — Reactivity Data Stability: Stable under normal conditions Conditions to Acids, bases, salts of heavy metals, reducing agents, and Avoid/Incompatibility: flammable substances Hazardous Decomposition Oxygen. Contamination with many substances will cause Products: decomposition. The rate of decomposition increases with increasing temperature and may be very vigorous with rapid generation of oxygen and steam. Section 5 — Regulations TSCA Inventory Listed: Yes CERCLA Hazardous Substance (40 CFR Part 302) Listed Substance: No Unlisted Substance: Yes SARA, Title III, Sections 313 (40 CFR Part 372) — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting: Community Right -To -Know Extremely Hazardous No Substance: WHNIIS Classification: C,132B Canadian Domestic Appears Substance List: J:\0perations\MSDS\Regenox Page 2 RegenGx — Part A Section G — Protective Measures, Storage and Handling Technical Protective Measures Storage: Oxidizer. Store in a cool, well ventilated area away from all sources of ignition and out of the direct sunlight. Store in a dry location away from heat and in temperatures less than 40 "C. Keep away from incompatible materials and keep lids tightly closed. Do not store in improperly labeled containers. Protect from moisture. Do not store near combustible materials. Keep containers well sealed. Store separately from reducing materials. Avoid contamination which may lead to decomposition. Handling: Avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. Use with adequate ventilation. Do not swallow. Avoid breathing vapors, mists or dust. Do not eat, drink or smoke in the work area. Label containers and keep them tightly closed when not in use. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Engineering Controls: General room ventilation is required if used indoors. Local exhaust ventilation, process enclosures or other engineering controls may be needed to maintain airborne levels below recommended exposure limits. Avoid creating dust or mists. Maintain adequate ventilation at all times. Do not use in confined areas. Keep levels below recommended exposure limits. To determine actual exposure limits, monitoring should be performed on a routine basis. Respiratory Protection: For many conditions, no respiratory protection is necessary; however, in dusty or unknown conditions or when exposures exceed limit values a NIQSH approved respirator should be used. Hand Protection: Wear chemical resistant gloves (neoprene, rubber, or PVC). 1:1Dperations\MSDSIRegenox Page 3 RegenOx — Part A Section b — Protective Measures, Storage and Handling (coat) Eye Protection: Wear chemical safety goggles. A full face shield may he wom in lieu of safety goggles. Skin Protection: Try to avoid skin contact with this product. Chemical resistant gloves (neoprene, PVC or rubber) and protective clothing should be warn during use. Other: Eye wash station. Protection Against Fire & Product is non -explosive. In case of fire, evacuate all non - Explosion: essential personnel, wear protective clothing and a self- contained breathing apparatus, stay upwind of fire, and use wager to spray cool fire -exposed containers. Section 7 — Hazards Identification Potential Health Effects Inhalation: Causes irritation to the respiratory tract. Symptoms may include coughing, shortness of breath, and irritations to mucous membranes, nose and throat. Eye Contact: Causes irritation, redness and pain. Skin Contact: Causes slight irritation. Ingestion: May be harmful if swallowed (vomiting and diarrhea). Section S -- Measures in Case of Accidents and Fire After Spillage/Leakage: Eliminate all ignition sources. Evacuate unprotected personnel and never exceed any occupational exposure limit. Shovel or sweep spilt material into plastic bags or vented containers for disposal. Do not return spilled or contaminated material to the inventory. Extinguishing Media: Water First Aid Eye Contact: Flush eyes with running water for at least 15 minutes with eyelids held open. Seek a specialist. Inhalation: Remove affected person to fresh air. Seek medical attention if the effects persist. Ingestion: If the individual is conscious and not convulsing, give two- four cups of water to dilute the chemical and seek medical attention immediately. Do Not induce vomiting. J:\Operations\MSDSIRegenox Page 4 RegenOx — Part A Section S — Measures in Case of Accidents and Fire (coat) Skin Contact: Wash affected areas with soap and a mild detergent and large amounts of water. Section 9 — Accidental Release Measures Precautions: Cleanup Methods: Shovel or sweep spilt material into plastic hags or vented containers for disposal. Do not return spilled or contaminated material to the inventory. Section 10 — Information on Toxicology Toxicity Data LD50 Ural (rat): 2,400 mg/kg LD50 Dermal (rabbit): Min 2,000 mg/kg LD50 Inhalation (rat): Min 4,580 mg/kg ' Section 11 Ecology —Information on Ecology Data Ecotoxicological NA Information: Section 12 — Disposal Considerations Waste Disposal Method Waste Treatment: Dispose of in an approved waste facility operated by an authorized contactor in compliance with local regulations. Package (Pail) Treatment: The empty and clean containers are to be recycled or disposed of in conformity with local regulations. 1:1Operations\MSDSIRegenox Page 5 RegenOx -- Part A Section 13 — Shipping/Transport Information D.U.T. Shipping Name. Oxidizing Solid, N.O.S. [A mixture of sodium percarbonate [2Na2CO3.3H2O2], sodium carbonate FNa,)CO3], sodium silicate and silica gel.] UN Number: 1479 Hazard Class: 5.1 Labels: 5.1 (Oxidizer) Packaging Group: M HMISs Rating Section 14 — Other Information Health — l (slight) Flammability — 0 {none} Reactivity —1 (slight) Lab PPE — goggles, gloves. and lab coat HMISO is a registered trademark of the National Painting and Coating Association. Section 15 — Further Information The information contained in this document is the best available to the supplier at the time of writing, but is provided without warranty of any kind. Some possible hazards have been determined by analogy to similar classes of material. The items in this document are subject to change and clarification as more information become available. This document is intended only as a guide to the appropriate precautionary handling of the material by a properly trained person. Individuals receiving this information must exercise their independent judgment in determining its appropriateness for a particular purpose. J:\Operations\MSDSacgenox Page 6 Regen ❑x — Part B (Activator Complex) Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Last Revised: November 7, 2005 Section I — Supplier Information and Material Identification Supplier: L. _f REGENESIS 101i Calle Sombra San Clemente, CA 92673 Telephone: 949.3 66. 8 000 Fax: 949.366.8090 E-mail: info(a�regenesis.com Chemical Description: A mixture of sodium silicate solution, silica gel and ferrous sulfate Chemical Family: Inorganic Chemicals Trade Name: Regen Ox — Part B (Activator Complex) Product Use: Used for environmental remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater Section 2 — Chemical Information/Other Designations CAS No. Chemical 1344-09-8 Slllcic Acid, Sodium Salt. Sodium Silicate 63231-67-4 Silica Gel 7720-78-7 Ferrous Sulfate 7732-18-5 Water Section 3 — Physical Data Form: Liquid Color: Blue/Green Odor: Odorless Melting Point: NA Boiling Point: NA Flammability/Flash Point: NA Vapor Pressure: NA Regenax — Part B Section 3 — Physical Data ( cant) Specific Gravity 1,39 glcm Solubility: Miscible Viscosity: NA pH (3% solution): 11 Hazardous Decomposition Oxides of carbon and silicon may be formed when Products: heated to decomposition. Section 4 — Reactivity Data Stability: Stable under normal conditions. Conditions to Avoid: None. Incompatibility: Avoid hydrogen fluoride, fluorine, oxygen difluoride, chlorine trifluoride, strong acids, strong bases, oxidizers, aluminum, fiberglass, copper, brass, zinc. and galvanized containers. Section 5 — Regulations TSCA Inventory Listed: Yes CERCLA Hazardous Substance (40 CFR Part 302) Listed Substance: No Unlisted Substance: Yes SARA, Title III, Sections 302/303 (40 CFR Part 355) — Emergency Planning and Notification Extremely Hazardous No Substance: SARA, Title III, Sections 311/312 (40 CFR Part 370) — Hazardous Chemical Reporting: Community Right -To -Know Hazard Category: Acute SARA, Title HI, Sections 313 (40 CFR Part 372) — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting: Community Right -To -Know Extremely Hazardous No Substance: Page 2 RegenOx — Part B Section 6 — Protective Measures, Storage and Handling Technical Protective Measures Storage: Keep in a tightly closed container (steel or plastic) and store in a cool, well ventilated area away from all incompatible materials (acids, reactive metals, and ammonium salts). Store in a dry location away from heat and in temperatures less than 24'C. Do not store in aluminum, fiberglass, copper, brass, zinc or galvanized containers. Handling: Avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. Avoid breathing spray mist. Use with adequate ventilation. Do not use product if it is brownish -yellow in color. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Engineering Controls: General room ventilation is required if used indoors. Local exhaust ventilation, process enclosures or other engineering controls may be needed to maintain airborne levels below recommended exposure limits. Safety shower and eyewash station should be within direct access. Respiratory Protection: Use NIGSH-approved dust and mist respirator where spray mist exists. Respirators should be used in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134. Hand Protection: Wear chemical resistant gloves. Eye Protection: Wear chemical safety goggles. A full face shield may be worn in lieu of safety goggles. Skin Protection: Try to avoid skin contact with this product. Gloves and protective clothing should be worn during use. Other. Protection Against Fire & Product is non -explosive and non-combustible. Explosion: Page 3 RegenOx — Part B Section 7 — Hazards Identification Potential Health Effects Inhalation: Causes irritation to the respiratory tract. Symptoms may include coughing, shortness of breath, and irritations to mucous membranes, nose and throat. Eye Contact: Causes irritation, redness and pain. Skin Contact: Causes irritation. Symptoms include redness, itching and pain. Ingestion: May cause irritation to mouth, esophagus, and stomach. Section S — Measures in Case of Accidents and Fire After Spillage/Leakage Mop up and neutralize liquid, then discharge to sewer in (small): accordance with local, state and federal regulations. After Spillage/Leakage Keep unnecessary personnel away; isolate hazard area (large): and do not allow entrance into the affected area. Do not touch or walk through spilled material. Stop leak if possible without risking injury. Prevent runoff from entering into storm sewers and ditches that lead to natural waterways. Isolate the material if at all possible. Sand or earth may be used to contain the spill. If containment is not possible, neutralize the contaminated area and flush with large quantities of water. Extinguishing Media: Material is compatible with all extinguishing media. Further Information: First Aid Eye Contact: Flush eyes with running water for at least 15 minutes with eyelids held open. Seek a specialist. Inhalation: Remove affected person to fresh air. Give artificial respiration if individual is not breathing. if breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Seek medical attention if the effects persist. Ingestion: If the individual is conscious and not convulsing, give two-four cups of water to dilute the chemical and seek medical attention immediately. DO NOT induce vomiting. Skin Contact: Wash affected areas with soap and a mild detergent and large amounts of water. Remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Page 4 RegenOx — Part B Section 9 — Accidental Release Measures Precautions: PPE: Wear chemical goggles, body -covering protective clothing, chemical resistant gloves, and rubber boots (see Section 6). Environmental Hazards: Sinks and mixes with water. High pH of this material may be harmful to aquatic life, Only water will evaporate from a spill of this material. Cleanup Methods: Pick-up and place in an appropriate container for reclamation or disposal. US regulations (CERCLA) require reporting spills and releases to soil, water and air in excess of reportable quantities. Section 14 — Information on Toxicology Toxicity Data Sodium Silicate: When tested for primary eye irritation potential according to OECD Guidelines, Section 405, a similar sodium silicate solution produced corneal, iridal and conjunctival irritation. Some eye irritation was still present 14 days after treatment, although the average primary irritation score has declined from 29.7 after 1 day to 4.0 after 14 days. When tested for primary skin irritation potential, a similar sodium silicate solution produced irritation with a primary irritation index of 3 to abraded skin and a to intact skin. Human experience confirms that irritation occurs when sodium silicates get on clothes at the collar, cuffs, or other areas where abrasion may exist. The acute oral toxicity of this product has not been tested. Ferrous Sulfate: LD50 Oral (rat): 319 mg/kg not a suspected carcinogen. Page 5 RegenOx — Part B Section 11 — Information on Ecology Ecology Data Ecotoxicological Based on 100% solid sodium silicate, a 96 hour median Information: tolerance for fish of 2,320 mgll; a 96 hour median tolerance for water fleas of 247 mglL; a 96 hour median tolerance for snail eggs of 632 mglL; and a 96 hour median tolerance for Amphipoda of 160 mg/L. Section 12 — Disposal Considerations Waste Disposal Method Waste Treatment: Neutralize and landfill solids in an approved waste facility operated by an authorized contactor in compliance with local regulations. Package (Pail) Treatment: The empty and clean containers are to be recycled or disposed of in conformity with local regulations. Section 13 — Shipping/Transport Information D.O.T. This product is not regulated as a hazardous material so there are no restrictions. Section 14—Other Information HMIS4 Rating Health — 2 (moderate) Reactivity — 0 (none) Flammability — 0 (none) Lab PPE — goggles, Contact — 1 (slight) gloves, and lab coat HMIS"' is a registered trademark of the National Painting and Coating Association. Section 15 — Further Information The information contained in this document is the best available to the supplier at the time of writing, but is provided without warranty of any kind. Some possible hazards have been determined by analogy to similar classes of material. The items in this document are subject to change and clarification as more information become available. This document is intended only as a guide to the appropriate precautionary handling of the material by a properly trained person. Individuals receiving this information must exercise their independent judgment in determining its appropriateness for a particular purpose. Page 6 Regendx — Part B Page 7 C❑ WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS soil I AMR �.. ^. `I 6 t. .. JLf a E� 1w COCA TONS am_. onrlomj f �I .. �, Ir 77 J. SCALE 1:24WO 1 0 1 MILE 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6wo 7000 FEET 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER ,1 lJf} 1 GR�AIVD k494 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 11929 GREENSBORO, N. C. W7947-TF-024 1951 REVaD 1994 DMA 5056 Ill SE —SERIES V842 ■ N. C. QUADRANGLE LOCATION FIGURE 1 I mmdmgqh O Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 704-442-1365 TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA RESTAURANT w- W— -5A MW-1A X MW-13A FIRST AMERICAN BANK VE-6 _ MW-4A W 2B vv - 4B G — • — - -- SOUTHERN VM cP �' ' E-5 REALTY 2 RW-1tVE,}- MW-3A MW-3B� PR TTp ECTI iv�M W 9B �+1W—iH W— SERVIC oI MW-9A TERI�IOE� PW it 1 MW 7A W—B + CONrROL APPROXIAMTE SCALLE 1 INCH EQUAL TO 80 FFET WAFFLE HOUSE If QUINCY'S FAMILY STEAKHOUSE MW-11A mW-11 C W�11 B Location of sou Boon LocaAon Advanced on March 4, 2010 PO BOX 78222 I - CHARLOTTE, NC 28271 (704)442-1365 FIGURE 1 SOIL BORING LOCATION MAP ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO,NC PROPOSED INJECTION TREATMENT AREA IS SHOWN IN ORANGE 0 20 feet V E-6 o W-2B MW—M W4B 4A� 1.82 �M W 2A .482 VE \ .;� - - AREA U AREA 1 VM 5.. �97 0.0�� W (VE- 27) 2.78 V 3 _ 5 204 SOUTHER VM-, -' �REALTY � 32 � j�;V�E- 0.0 4/-� VW— (VE MW 3A MW o PROT� E� O MW-9B m \N �B� W-8A sERv�cEs � MW-9A � �1 1�IIlIII��1111t111 �■■I■�l■I■ Illll � i■■�■■■lillliil Ali I �1 � a I �� �11111�� 1�f1 !f1 0'��'1"'�I'�'y ��II� 11��'�� III 1i � 1 ■ � I f I ll1 1 1 111 ■I I 1■I ■ I !!III 1� �■■■■ 1I1 it 1 11 ■ 11 II illl 111f11■■11��■■I�l11111I1111■ �-.Illll 111!�!1111■II 111�11■ ■ I■ ■ [■ 1 Ii1111111 IN 11l111111m1 11 ■ n I i 111111 1101■i In ■I ■ 111111 I'll I■■■■■■ f I{ 11,11■1 11 ■ 11 Il I llllll�l11111 !■III I■ 111111 1II■11i■ I■ 2 1IS1111111111 I■ 11 ■ 11 I 1 1 iI�I I� � III f1fr11 ■I i� ■1 f� 1� �! ��I�i ii ir: f ! ! ili!!! ! 1111E Iwo; I'm ii R im N l■■ IN �11 I1 ■71 I ■ ■IIIII 1111fpl1 ROM 01101111111!II! 11 ■fIN 111■ BI11 i1 flllll■■■ ■■■■ ■■■�lI11IN11111111� ■�■�■■�llfl1 �i■ I�l■ ■111111 11111111 ■■■■■■■■11I1I1 ■ii■ ION ■ 111111 ■111 III ���LEE �■ ■■■■■■� Ill ! Ilo ■ ■ 11111I M 11111 11■ ■ ■■■■■III! 1111][is WOMEN, Film ���11 ■■1;■ ■■■■■■■■■8 ■■ D NOTE: +��+ }��+� l I -T o oil Rogers, Michael r' From: Joseph P. Nestor [nescoenv@carolina.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 1:58 PM To: Rogers. Michael, Wang, Shuying Cc: 'Gene Mao'; 'Sam Niemann' Subject: Planned Inject Event Notification To: Aquifer Protection Staff (Central Office and Winston-Salem Regional Office) The referenced permit includes the following requirement: "At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well, the Permittee shall notify the Aquifer Protection Section -Underground injection Control (UIC) Central Office staff, telephone number (919) 715-6166 and the Winston-Salem Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section Staff, telephone number (336) 771-5000." This email is intended to satisfy the notification requirements contained in the permit which is shown in the paragraph above. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) completed the first injection event during the week of November 15, 2010. Nesco Environmental completed the second injection event during the week of December 13, 2010. Nesco Environmental intends to perform the third injection event during the week of January 31, 2011 Nesco Environmental requests that someone from the Central Office and someone from the Winston-Salem Regional Office forward an email back to me confirming receipt of this notification. Also if a telephone call is required to satisfy permit requirements, please let me know. If you have any questionslcomments, please contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nescoe nv(a-)carolina. rr. co m Rogers, Michael From: Joseph P. Nestor [nescoenv@a caroiina.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:44 AM To: Rogers, Michael; Wang. Shuying Cc. Watts, Debra; 'Gene Mao'; 'Sam Niemann': 'Stephen Sloan' Subject: Injection Permit W10400140 - ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC - 509 Teauge Street - Greensboro, NC To: Aquifer Protection Staff (Central Office and Winston-Salem Regional Office) The referenced permit includes the following requirement: "At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well. the Permittee shall notify the Aquifer Protection Section -Underground injection Control (UIC) Central Office staff, telephone number (919) 715-6166 and the Winston-Salem Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section Staff, telephone number (336) 771-5000." This email is intended to satisfy the notification requirements contained in the permit which is shown in the paragraph above. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) completed one of the three planned injection events during the week of November 15, 2010. Nesco Environmental plans to begin the second injection event on Monday, December 13, 2010. Nesco Environmental requests that someone from the Central Office and someone from the Winston-Salem Regional Office forward an email back to me confirming receipt of this notification. Also if a telephone call is required to satisfy permit requirements, please let me know. If you have any questionsicomments, please contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. P❑ Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nes coenv(c_)ca roi i na. rr. com Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nescoenv(cD ca rol i na. rr. com Rogers, Michael From: Joseph P. Nestor [nescoenv@carolina.rr.comj Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:40 PM To: Wang, Shuying; Michael.Rogers@ncdenr.govifyou Cc: Rogers, Michael; Watts, Debra;'Gene Mao'; 'Sam Niemann'; 'Stephen Sloan' Subject: Injection Permit WI0400140 - ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC - 509 Teauge Street - Greensboro, NC To: Aquifer Protection Staff (Central Office and Winston-Salem Regional Office) The referenced permit includes the following requirement: "At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well. the Permittee shall notify the Aquifer Protection Section -Underground injection Control (UlC) Central Office staff, telephone number (919) 715-6166 and the Winston-Salem Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section Staff, telephone number (336) 771-5000." This email is intended to satisfy the notification requirements contained in the permit which is shown in the paragraph above. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) plans to begin injection activities on Monday, November 15, 2010. Nesco Environmental requests that someone from the Central Office and someone from the Winston-Salem Regional Office forward an email back to me confirming receipt of this notification. Also it a telephone call is required to satisfy permit requirements, please let me know. If you have any questions/comments, please contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Joseph P. Nestor. P.G., P.E. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) nescoenv carolina.rr.com Rogers, Michael From: Slusser, Thomas ; Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:16 AM To: nescoenv@carolina.rr.com Cc: Rogers, Michael: Watts, Debra; Wang, Shuying Subject: RE: Injection Permit W 10400140 - ARAMARK - Greensboro Greetings Joe, Thanks for letting us know about the progress of your injection project. As discussed on the telephone this morning, you may install the requested amount of additional direct -push points per injection event as long as they are located in the originally -permitted area in order to emplace the permitted injection volumes, and that you submit post -injection documentation of how many wells and their locations for our injection well inventory and permit file. FYI, I will be out all next week. Take care, and good luck! Thomas. E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. -----Original Message ----- From: Joseph P. Nestor[niailt_❑:nescoenvQcarolina.rr.coml Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:58 PM To: Slusser, Thomas Subject: Fw: Injection Permit WI0400140 - ARAMARK - Greensboro Thomas Mr. Rogers automatic email response referred me to you. Is there any chance of getting this addressed tommorrow? Thanks. 3oe Nestor ------Original message ------ From: 3oseph Nestor To: Michael.Rogers(@ncdenr.gov To: debra.watts(@ncdenr.gov Cc: Samuel J. Niemann Cc: shuying.wang@ncdenr.gov Cc: ssloanPgexnc.com Subject: Injection Permit WI0400140 Sent: Nov 18, 2010 7:42 PM Mr. Rogers and/or Ms. Watts: - ARAMARK - Greensboro Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C.(Nesco Environmental) has begun the first of three planned injection events under the referenced permit. Nesco Environmental is performing the work for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK). As you may recall, the permit was for the injection of REGENOX into eighteen (18)direct-push technique (DPT) borings dur each event. A total of 4,620 F ds of REGENOX is permitted to be injected in a solution of 5,490 gallons during each event. Based on the permitted number of DPT borings, this equates to 256.67 pounds of REGENOX and 330 gallons per DPT boring per event. During the current event, we have had several occasions where the solution has "daylighted" to the surface. When this has occurred, we have either (1) reduced the pumping rate and pressure and continued pumping if "daylighting" subsided or (2) ceased injection at that particular DPT boring. Consequently, it has become apparent that we will not be able to inject either the permitted mass of REGENOX or the permitted volume of solution into only 18 DPT points during each event. Nesco Environmental desires to advance additional DPT borings and inject REGENOX solution into these borings during each injection event. Nesco Environmental does not desire to increase the permitted mass of REGENOX or the permitted volume of the solution. Nesco Environmental believes injecting the REGENOX solution into additional DPT borings will allow for better distribution of the remediation chemicals in the subsurface and will hasten the cleanup of soil and ground water at this site. Nesco Environmental respectfully requests that ARAMARK be allowed to construct additional DPT borings for injection purposes. Nesco Environmental proposes that up to thirty (30) DPT boring be advanced during each event and that these borings be confined to the areas previously indicated in the permit application. Since we are in the field performing the injection event, we are hopeful that we may receive verbal approval of this request tomorrow morning. Please contact me on my mobile telephone (704-737-4046)to discuss. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Joe Nestor Nesco Environmental Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 2 A Probnonaf Umft i Lwbhty C fflp" August 24, 2010 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Via email (michael.rogers2ncdenr.gov) and US Mail Re Response to August 16, 2010 Additional Information Request Application for Permit to Inject RegenOx into Subsurface Application No. W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: RECEIVED / ❑ENR r 0VVQ Aquifer Protection Section AUG 2e wo Nesco Environmental, P.L. L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this correspondence for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC {ARAMARK}. We are in receipt of your August 16, 2010 correspondence which requests additional information regarding the referenced application. Below are each of your bullet points followed by Nesco Environmental's response in blue. There was no groundwater flow rate (velocity) information in the Application. Please provide the annual groundwater flow rate in feet along with the calculations used (specifically provide specific yield or porosity and gradient). Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR August 24, 2010 Page 2 Ground water flow velocity calculations may be found in Attachment 3 of the Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum dated December 20, 1995. This document was included on a CD which was included with the application package. A copy of these calculations is attached. o Will the recovery wells for the groundwater remediation system be in operation during the injection events and afterwards through post -injection monitoring activities? Nesco Environmental intends to deactivate the remediation system immediately before each injection event (unless it is already deactivated) and leave the system deactivated for at least three weeks after each injection event to prevent the removal of remediation chemical before these chemicals have had the opportunity to react with chlorinated volatile organic compounds in the subsurface. Depending upon scheduling, the system may be reactivated between each injection event and post injection monitoring. o The monitoring plan proposes that, essentially, only geochemical field parameters (temperature, DO, ORP, and pH) will be monitored prior to each injection event. We will also need a scan of the same suite of parameters as those monitored for in the post -injection events in order to monitor injection effectiveness (e.g. VOCs, iron, silicon, sodium. silica, and carbonate). Whenever the final injection occurs (the Application states the maximum number of separate injection events is 3) a final monitoring needs to be completed 5 months afterwards. The revised monitoring plan could be inserted as a new, replacement page in the Application. Nesco Environmental prepared the attached revised monitoring plan. o Please collect updated groundwater elevation data from all wells prior to the initial injection and generate an updated potentiometric map(s). Nesco Environmental will collect a round of ground water elevation data from accessible monitoring wells prior to injection activities and prepare ground water potentiomentric maps. Mr- Michael Rogers NCDENR August 24, 2010 Page 3 There is some confusion in the labeling of the figures, which were in the application. There are 2 isoconcentration maps for the transition zone dated October 2009- They both are labeled Figure I {the Site Map is also labeled Figure I} but present different analytical data. One of these maps is probably the map for the bedrock aquifer as there was a reference to an isoconcentration for the bedrock wells in the Application but not labeled or identified as such. Also, there is a water table map for transition zone, but not for the bedrock. If available, please submit a potentiometric map for the bedrock also. Nesco Environmental apologizes for the confusion. The third isoconcentration map was, as you suggested, for bedrock but was incorrectly titled as transition zone. This third isoconcentration map includes data for recovery wells RW-1 and RW-2 and monitoring wells MW-11 C, MW-12C, MW-14C and MW-15C. A correctly titled isoconcentration map for bedrock is attached- A potentiomentric map for bedrock was not included in the original application because of the limited number of points at the site from which bedrock potentiometric data may be extracted. Attached is a bedrock potentiomentric map for October 28, 2009 which is based upon data from three points (monitoring wells MW-11 C, MW-12C, and MW-14C)- This map should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of data points and the locations of these data points relative to other data points. If additional information is necessary, or should you have any questions concerning the application package, please contact me at (704) 442-1355. Sincerely, NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 kLtot01 Sian Se Aq�tter prose Ava 2e �o1a Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President CC' Sam Niemann — The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang — NCDENR (via email) JPNljpn 20100824 M lkl M CDR _ _ UTATICN SHEET SHEET OP ___� rya Heirmv Tray P.D. BOX 9923 ►MAdMn, Wr 34MB-8923 (" 831-"44 FAX (Oft 831-3334 ►ROJ[CT PROPOSAL NAME rREPAREO 4NECi[E8 r J L � ou�DWJ�TEK . PLOW VEILOC2,�a-XE. 5 -us,rNGk . F�EcD__._.Ddi" �?' • -ICY s. .LAW . _� � � '--..f:�L►�us. -:. _ ' � �v�r' .ytjoc�- �- :_ i V �OLSf� � ,•'- 0.033 '��B°` U-91 Wry M y -•� i - -- . _ �J,7.. _ ,�,r�6 ►� � '�t. �:dr�k- _ -�s rraf . kv�w,n -4r►•� ; c41•K� _�, �_ i �Oj 4�r "V4 Jot E� v,;-1-*4ie5_ +e-u v�5; - zae'E. O •sot5q rro', x , be c4 w�. �pa� L _ ATTACHMENT 3 GROUNDWATER FLAW CALCULATIONS rAWPAASMPJT100-120M14HA012M-14G 11110M LTNWJ -�Ar Aa NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coteen H. Sullins Governor Director August 1 G, 2010 ,Joseph P. Nestor. P.G. NESCO Environmental P-O. Box 782221 Charlotte. NC 28271 Re: Additional Information Request Injection Well Permit Application Nk10400141) Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC Guilford County Dear Mr. Nestor-, Natural Resources Dee Freeman Secretary We are in receipt of your letter dated August 11, 2010. Thank you for the additional information. However, while reviewing the referenced permit Application, our staff identified some additional items that need clarification and/or information. Please address the following items: There was no groundwater flow rate (velocity) information in the Application. Please provide the annual groundwater flow rate in feet along with the calculations used (specifically provide specific yield or porosity and gradient). Will the recovery wells for the groundwater remediation system be in operation during the injection events and afterwards through post -injection monitoring activities? The monitoring plan proposes that, essentially, only geochemical field parameters (temperature, DO, ORP, and pH) will be monitored prior to each injection event. We will also need a scan of the same suite of parameters as those monitored for in the post -injection events in order to monitor injection effectiveness (e.g,, VOCs, iron, silicon, sodium, silica. and carbonate). Whenever the final injection occurs (the Application states the maximum number of separate injection events is 3) a final monitoring needs to be completed 5 months afterwards. The revised monitoring plan could be inserted as a new, replacement page in the Application. ■ Please collect updated groundwater elevation data from all wells prior to the initial injection and generate an updated potentiometric map(s). There is some confusion in the labeling of the figures, which were in the application, There are 2 isoconcentration maps for the transition zone dated October 2009. They both are labeled Figure 1 (the Site Map is also labeled Figure 1 ) but present different analytical data. One of these maps is probably AOt11FEP PROTECTION SECTION 1636 Mail Service Cerwi , Rakeigr, NCR Carolina 27699-1 63G Location. 2726 Gaonal $aulevard, Raleigh, North :Amlma 27604 one Rnom- 919-'33 3µ'21 , FA 1 a 19-715.0588: FAX 2 919-715.6M8 ti Customer Service i-$T7-o2 -6748 North C a rol i n a inlemet: wxrw,ntwateroualitv.arn r V' �,��l��i�r�l� ► , E-pu�A CJpporiungv ,-%Mfmauva waor,=rnpbyer the map for the bedrock a er as there was a reference to an isoci :ntration for the bedrock wells in the Application but not iaaeled or identified as such. Also, there is a water table map for transition zone. but not for the bedrock. If available, please submit a potentiometric map for the bedrock also. Please submit ? copies of your responses with any corrected text pages/figures {same scale and page size} for insertion into the previously submitted UIC Application within 30 calendar da s of receipt of this letter. Send one copy to my attention at the Central Office and the other copy to the attention of Ms. WanL_= at the Winston- Salem Regional Office. If you have any questions regarding your permit please call me at (919) 715-6166 or email me at M i chael.R oiterslwncrl enr.gor. Thank you for your cooperation. Best Regards, Michael Rogers. P.G. (NC L) Environmental Specialist cc: Sherri Knight — Winston-Salem Regional Office Central Office File — WI0400140 Gene Mao - Guilford County Dept. of Public Health. 1100 W. Wendover Avenue. Greensboro. NC '_7405 7 Rogers, Michael From: Joseph P. Nestor [nescoenv a@carolina.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 7:56 PM To: Rogers, Michael Cc: 'Sam Niernann'-. Wang, Shuying Subject: Application No. W 10400140 - ARAMARK Greensboro facility Attachments: 2010-08-11 - Addendum to injection permit applicabon.pdf Mr. Rogers; Attached is an addendum to the referenced permit application. I will also send you a hard copy. After you receive this email, would you kindly provide me with an update regarding when you expect NCDENR to respond to the application. Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesc❑ Environmental, P.L.L.C. P❑ Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) n es coe nvCcDca rol i n a. m core zironmental August 11, 2010 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Via email (michael.rogersC@ncdenr.gov) and US Mail Re. Application for Permit to Inject Regen>Cx into Subsurface Application No. W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this correspondence for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK)_ As we discussed previously by telephone, Nesco Environmental met with Ms. Shuying Wang of NCDENR at the ARAMARK facility on July 1, 2010. Ms. Wang indicated that she believed additional monitoring beyond what was proposed in the original application was warranted. The purpose of this correspondence is to propose additional soil and ground water monitoring to evaluate the effects of the proposed injection activities. Environmental and Geologic Services PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 -f - 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@carolina.rr.com Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR August 1 1, 2010 Page 2 SOIL_ MONITORING Nesco Environmental proposes that soil borings be advanced and sampled approximately one month after injection activities have been completed. Nesco Environmental proposes that a total four borings be advanced by direct -push techniques (DPT), Nesco Environmental recommends that these borings be advanced to ❑PT refusal. Nesco Environmental recommends that samples be collected and screened with a photo -ionization detector (PID) at approximately 5-foot intervals. Nesco Environmental proposes that one boring be advanced immediately adjacent to the location of Boring A (advanced on March 4, 2010) and another boring be advanced immediately adjacent to the location of Boring G (also advanced on March 4, 2010). Borings A and G represent the "worst case" conditions noted during the pre -injection evaluation performed in March 2010. Nesco Environmental proposes that samples be collected from these two borings at approximately the same depths at which the "worst case" conditions were noted for Borings A & G and that these samples be analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B. Nesco Environmental proposes that two other Borings be advanced at locations between five and ten feet from Regenox injection points. Nesco Environmental proposes that a sample be selected from each of these two boring on the basis of the highest PI❑ measurement for each boring. Nesco Environmental proposes that these samples be analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B. Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR August 11, 2010 Page 3 GROUND WATER MONITORING Nesco Environmental intends to perform its normal annual ground water monitoring in October 2010. The normal monitoring is for VOCs by EPA Method 826013. If injection activities have taken place prior to the scheduled October 2010 event, Nesco Environmental proposes that monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-4A, MW-413, MW-7A, MW-713, MW-8B, MW-9A, and MW-9B also be monitored for iron, silicon, sodium, silica, and carbonate. If injection activities have not taken place prior to the scheduled October 2010 event, Nesco Environmental proposes that monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-313, MW- 4A, MW-4B, MW-7A, MW-715, MW-813, MW-9A, and MW-913 be monitored for VOCs, iron, silicon, sodium, silica, and carbonate two to four months after the injection activities. In addition, Nesco Environmental proposes that monitoring wells MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-4A, MW-413, MW-7A, MW-713, MW-8B, MW-9A, and MW-913 be monitored for VOCs. iron, silicon, sodium, silica, and carbonate during the 2011 annual monitoring event scheduled for October 2011. If additional information is necessary, or should you have any questions concerning the application package, please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESC❑ ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President cc: Sam Niemann — The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang — NCDENR (via email) JPNlipn 201Doa11 NCDENR Noah Carolina department of Environment and Natural Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves perdue Coleen H. Sullins Governor Director June 15, 2010 Doug Helmstetler Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 115 North First Street Burbank. NC 91502 Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WI0400140 Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (51) Guilford Dear Mr. Helmstetler: Resources Dee Freeman Secretary The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division] acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting materials on June 3.2010. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by Michael Rogers. The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests. Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below_ must provide recommendations prior to final action by the Division. Please also note at this time, processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Rogers at 919-715-6166. or via e-mail at michael.rogers@ncdenr.gov. If the reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized. To review our new organizational chart, go to http:./h2o.enr.state.nc.us/document-,/dwci oruchan df. PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER "EN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT. Sincerely, 'Sr r for Debra J. Watts Supervisor cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office. Aquifer Protection Section Joseph Nestor (Nesco Environmental - PO Box 78222. Charlotte. NC 28271 ) Permit Application File W10400140 AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION 163614ail Serves Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636 Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard. Raleigh. North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919.733-3221 1 FAX 1 919-715-05W FAX 2. 919-71MG48 1 Customer -Service. "77-623.5748 Internet www.ncwaterquaiq.org One North Carpi ina An Equal Gr3aortunny r Affirmalive Anon Emoiayer A PMNMS ^W Ltmftd LkabdMy Company June 1, 2010 Mr. Thomas Siusser NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina ❑ENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Re. Application for Permit to Inject RegenOx into Subsurface ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina h[�l �l� �liR•�CCaiii � r•�•�•�i�] Dear Mr. Slusser: RECE1E� I pE�1R I DW4 otN Aw1F p 1390'rr- 1 N �U0 3 Luis Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared the attached application package for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. Nesco Environmental proposes to inject RegenOx into the vadose zone by direct -push technique (DPT) drilling. RegenOx is on NCDENR's approved list of remediation injectants. Nesco Environmental proposes to inject this remediation material during three separate events. During each event. Nesco Environmental proposes to inject approximately 5,480 gallons of a RegenOx solution. Each 5,480-gallon batch of solution, will contain approximately 2,310 pounds of RegenOx Oxidizer (Part A) and approximately 2.310 pounds of RegenOx Activator (Part B). The goal of the proposed injection activity is to reduce the mass of residual chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) which are present in unsaturated soil. The affected soil is believed to act as a secondary source of impact to the underlying ground water. Environmental and Geologic Services PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@7a carolina.rr.com Mr. Thomas Slusser NCDENR June 1, 2010 Page 2 If additional information is necessary, or should you have any questions concerning this application package. please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 I Joseph P. Nestor. P.G.. P.E. President Enclosures JPNljpn 20100601 RECEIVED ! DENR 1 DWO AQDIFFR PP0Tr-f'TIr)N 4FC7ION JUN 0 3 Gull! Rapers, Michael From: 5lusser, Thomas Sent: Monday. August 16. 2010 2:39 PM To: Rogers, Michael Subject: RE. 51 Application WI 0400140 Aramark Hi r\like, yes, there is no problem with that approach. "T. r77k Cc- .iY111.^•r1:1 ri, o,-1„^,dr t ihSr'111"r.''11 r^"i From: Rogers, Michael Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:08 PM To: Slusser, Thomas Subject: 5I Application WI 0400140 Aramark Thomas - Just wanted to check with you before sending additional information request letter for the above site. The applicant is proposing to inject RegenOx oxidant into the unsaturated zone of a dry-cleaning site contaminated with RCE in the sail and groundwater. Do you see any problems with this approach? Thanks Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL) Environmental Specialist NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS) 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Direct Line (919) 715-6166; Fax 715-0588 (put to my attn on cover letter) http:lip orta1. ncdenr.org/web/wglaps/gwproiperm it -applications E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties AQUIFER PROTECTI1 SECTION - GROUNDWATI PROTECTION UNIT REGIONAL STAFF REPORT Date: July 1, 2010 Permittee(s): Ararnark Uniform & Career Apparel Permit No.: WI 04 00140 To: APS Central Office County: Guilford Central Office Reviewer: Michael. Rogers Project Name: Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Regional Login No: L GENERAL INFORMAT7oN I . This application is (check an dial apply): ❑ SFR Waste Irrigation System D] UIC Welltsj ® New ❑ Renewal ❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ EvaporationlInfiltration Lagoon ❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt ❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal ❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Rernediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remcdiation) Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ® Yes or ❑ No. a. Date of site visit: July 1, 2010 b. Person contacted and contact information: Joseph Nestor, NESCO Environmental. PLLC c. Site visit conducted by: Shuying Wang. WSRO d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ® No. 1s the following information entered into the B I M S record for this application correct? ❑ Yes or ® No. 1f no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application. For SFR Treatment Facilities: a. Location: b. Driving Directions: c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: d. Latitude: Longitude: Method Used (GPS, GoogleTM, etc.), e. Regulated Activities 1 Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater): For UIC Injection Sites: (If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site a. Locations): 509 Teague St., Greensboro, NC b. Driving Directions: From WSRO. take_1-40_ east for about 27 miles, take_ exit 36 on the left for Randleman Rd„ then turn right at Randleman Rd.. then_, take the first right onto Teague -St.: the destination, 509 Teague St —will be on the left - c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Greensboro NC and 36079-A7-TF-024 d. Latitude: 36.03114179 Longitude:-79.90262067 Method Used (GPS, GoogleTM, etc.), GPS at t17e site RECEIVED I f3ENR / DWQ Aquifer Protection Section 1IP5-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) JUL 19 2010 Page 1 of 6 Pages AQUIFER PROTECTI+ SECTION -- GROUNDWATI PROTECTION UNIT REGIONAL STAFF REPORT IV INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS {Complete these two sections for a[] systems that use injection %yells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat pump injection wells.) Description of Well(s) and Facilities — New, Renewal, and Modification I - Type of injection system; ❑ Heat i ng/coo I i ng water return flow (5A7) ❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW) ® In situ remediation (5I) ❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5 U"Non -Discharge") ❑ Other (Specify: 2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ®No :. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑ No What is/are the pollution source(s)? Petroleum Rroducts from an Exxon station. What is the distance of the injection_ well(s) from the pollution source(s)? 200 ft. 4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 2 ft. 5. Quality of drainage at site: ® Good ❑ Adequate ❑ Poor G. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High 7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequeIIcy of (11onitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ® No. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: (I ) Since injection of RegenOx is to treat contaminated soil in the vadose zone, at some point after injection is completed, depending on how fast the reaction between contaminants and iiilectants to take place and complete, treated soil should be sampled for contam to be treated and Intl ctarit constittl_ents, such as sod lll_m—bicarbonate,_s_iIica, Iron, and sulfate; (2)_tomonitoring effects of the proposed injection on groundwater quality and injectants are not over applied,_ iniectant concentrations in groundwater should be also monitored 3 in order to monitor effects of injection activities on groundwater, an additional sampling event six months after the last injection event is corn pleted should be considered. WSRG has no objections on proposed SVE sampling plan. S. Does the snap presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No. If no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site, Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow. Injection Well Permit Renewal and Modification Only: I. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water, failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If Yes, explain:_ A?S-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 4 of 6 Pages AQUIFER PROTECTI SECTION — GROUNDWATI PROTECTION UNIT REGIONAL STAFF REPORT 2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: 3. For renewal or modification of Groundwater rem ediation permits (of any type), will continued/additional/modified injections have an adverse impact on Emigration of the plume or management of the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: 4. Drilling Contractor: Name: Address: NC Certification number: 5. Complete and attach NEW injection Facility Inspection Report, if applicable V. EV4L UATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS 1, Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the Application: Please refer to IV. 7. 2. Attach new Injection Facility Inspeclion Form, if applicable 3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain briefly. 4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request. Make SLire that you provide a reason for each item: Item Reason a. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each condition: Condition Reason G. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition: Condition Reason APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 5 of 6 Pages AQUIFER PROTECTH SECTION - GROUNDWATI PROTECTION UNIT ` REGIONAL STAFF REPORT 7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information; Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons: 8. Signature of report Preparers): Signature of APS regional supervisor: Date:L-1/10 VI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAND SITE MAP (,Sketch ofsite showing house and waste irrigation systenr, spray or drip field, location of wellfs), anrUor other relevant i►afornration- SHOW NORTHARROM APS-CPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 6 of Pages AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION APPLICATION REVIEW REO VEST FORM Date: .tune 18. 20 10 To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS ❑ David May, WaRO-APS ❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS ❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ® Sherri Knight, W-SRO-APS ❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS From: Michael Rogers Groundwater Protection Unit Telephone: (919) 715-6166 Fax: (919) 715-0588 E-Mail. Michael.Rog_ers(a)ncmail.net A. Permit Number: Al 0400140 B. Owner. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel C. Facility/Operation: ❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ❑ Operation D. Application: 1. PermitType: ❑ Animal ❑ SFR-Surface Irrigation❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration ❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation (ND) ® UIC — 51 Groundwater Remediation Well For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal ❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal 2. Project Type: ® New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod.. E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit. NOTE: Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review, comment, and/or action. Within, please take the following actions: ® Return a Completed APSARR Form and attach laboratory analytical results, if applicable. ❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet. ❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU. ❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.* * Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail. When you receive this request form., please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person listed above. RO-APS Reviewer: Date: FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1 Michael F. i~axicy, Gawnlar ^.�SNEo North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health ■ Epidemiology Section 1912 Mail Scmce Centel • Ratmgh, North Carolina 27699.1912 Tel 919-707-5900 ■ Fax 919-870-4810 September 5, 2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Qu Qi Underground Injection Control Program Aquifer Protection Section FROM: Luanne K. Williams, Pharm.D., Toxicologist `��-- Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Unit Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services {:arnim Hooker 0dam. Se retary SUBJECT: Use of Non. -Biological Products RegenOx'rm to Enhance Biodegradation of Contaminated Groundwater I am writing in response to a request for a health risk evaluation regarding the use of non - biological product RegenOxrM to enhance biodegradation of contaminated groundwater. Based upon my review of the information submitted, I offer the following health risk evaluation: Some effects or hazards reported to be associated with the chemicals proposed for use are as follows: Exposure can cause severe irritation and possibly burns to the skin, eyes, nose, throat, lungs. and gastrointestinal tract (Micromedex TOMES Plus System CD-ROM Database, Volume 73, 2007) 2. If the products are released into the environment in a way that could result in a suspension of fine solid or liquid particles (e.g-, grinding, blending, vigorous shaking or mixing), then proper personal protective equipment should be used - Persons working with this product should at least wear goggles or a face shield, gloves, and protective clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or sprays. 4. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should never be permitted in the application area during or immediately following application. Safety controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery systems are working properly. QbI.ncaturn 5505 Six Vorkz Rwda 2-1 Flexor. R[Kim DI ■ ltalei h7 N.0 276M. An E.clual Opportunity Employer 5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent adverse reactions and injuries. b_ Access to the area of application should be limited to the workers applying the product. In order to minimize exposure to unprotected individuals, measures should be taken to prevent access to the area of application. 7. Efforts should be made to prevent contamination of existing or future wells acid surface waters that may be located. near the application area. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions at (919) 707-5912. I NESCQ Environmental R Nulessollar � I1N L•abeMjr Car.pany June 15, 2012 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program � Aquifer Protection Section �-j t`~ North Carolina ❑ENR-DWQ �C, 1636 Mail Service Center rL Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Via email (michael.ro ers ncdenr. ov) and US Mail Re. Injection Summary Report November 2010 to February 2011 Application No. W10400140 ARAMAR K U niform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared the attached report for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK). Also attached is a CD which includes the report in Adobe Acrobat format. Environmental and Geologic Services PO Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@carolina.rr.com Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR June 15, 2012 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President cc: Sam Niemann — The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang — NCDENR (via email and US Mail) Gene Mao — Guilford County (C❑ only via US Mail) JPNljpo 20120615 APPENDICES Appendix I Analytical Results for Samples Collected prior to Initiation of Injection �ctivitles 4'pendix 11 Injection Record Summary and Injection Records for Individual Injection L� Points Appendix III Analytical Results for Samples Collected after Initiation of Injection Activities Appendix IV Plots of PCE Concentrations for Recovery Wells and Selected Monitoring Wells 1.0 INTRODUCTION Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this report for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK). ARAMARK owns and operates an industrial laundry and uniform distribution depot at 509 Teague Street in Greensboro, North Carolina Soil and ground water have been impacted by a release or releases of chlorinated solvents at this site. A previous owner of the subject property performed dry cleaning activities at the subject property. No dry cleaning activities have occurred at the subject property since 1987 or before. A Report for Preliminary Subsurface Investigation prepared in 1988 indicates it is believed that accidental releases of tetrachloroethene (which is synonymous with perch loroehylene [PCEI) occurred when a pressure relief device opened on a dry cleaning machine located near the back door at the southwest corner of the facility building. This report describes the releases as inadvertent "de minimus" losses. The released PCE evidently flowed or was washed out the back door. Above -ground storage tanks (ASTs) were also located south of the facility and were used to store PCE. The former ASTs are also a potential source of PCE. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system has been in operation at the subject site since July 1993, From July 1993 until September 2004, soil gases were drawn from three vapor extraction points (VE-1, VE-2, and VE-3). On September 29, 2004. four additional vapor extraction points were brought on line (VE-4 through VE-7). A ground water recovery and treatment unit has been in operation since October 1997. Between October 1997 and September 29, 2004 ground water was recovered from one ground water recovery well (RW-1). On September 29, 2004. a second ground water recovery well (RW-2) was brought on line. Ground water is treated by an air stripper and then discharged to the sanitary sewer under a permit issued by the City of Greensboro. 1 En77: February 9, 2011 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Via email michael.ro ers ncdenr. ov) and US Mail Re: Injection Event Summary Third Injection Event January 31, 2011 to February 4, 2011 Application No. W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: RECEIVED / DENR / DWp A0U1 FP: R 'AR0TFr T1 nN ,gFC T10N FEB 18 2011 Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this (Xvj-r- correspondence for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK). Nesco Environmental was at the referenced site for the eC of three planned injection events during the period January 31, 2011 to February 4, 2011. Nesco Environmental subcontracted Geologic Exploration Company of Statesville, North Carolina to advance borings by direct -push technology (DPT), to mix REGENOX solution, and inject REGENDX solution into the subsurface through the DPT borings. Environmental and Geologic Services PG Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@carolina.rr.com Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR February 9, 2011 Page 2 Attached is a figure which shows the locations of the injection points during the latest and previous injection events. Also attached are a REGENOX Injection Record Summary and a REGENOX Injection Record each injection point. Twenty DPT injection points were advanced during this latest event. These injection points are designated 1-33 to 1-53. Approximately 2.277 gallons of solution was injected during the latest event. The approximate concentration of the solution was 9 percent reagent (both Part A and Part B) by weight. Approximately 870 pounds of Part A and 870 pounds of Part B were injected during the latest event for a total of 1,740 pounds of REGENOX reagent. Recall that Part A is the oxidant and Part B is the activator. Nesco Environmental notes that the injection project is proceeding at a slower pace than originally planned. At numerous -injection points. daylighting has been an issue. Consequently. more injection points than originally planned have been required for emplacement of the design mass of remediation chemicals. Originally. it was planned to complete the injection project in three injection events. An additional event or events will be required to place the design mass of remediation chemicals into the subsurface. If additional information is necessary. or should you have any questions concerning this project, please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 ' ip Joseph P. Nestor. P.G., P. E President cc: Sam Niemann — The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang — NCDENR (via email) JPN'jpn 20110209 RECEIVED i DENR 1 DWQ AQUIFFP PROTPrTION SECTION FEB 10 2011 N A RAMAR K M W_2 B T- EXISTING FENCE EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING MW-2A 0 MW-2A EXISTING WATER TABLE WELL D MW-28 EXISTING MONITORING WELL [NON -WATER TABLE] VE-6 0VE-3 EXISTING VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL D vm- 1 EXISTING VACUUM MONITORING PROBE V�B =MW-4A RW- 1 EXISTING RECOVERY WELL VE- •- Q }( MW--2A W-2 ABANDONED WATER TABLE WELL VM-2 (VE-7) MW-29 ABANDONED MONITORING WELL (NON -WATER TABLE) VE-2 J INJECTION POINT LOCATION (NOVEMBER 15- 19. 2010) VM-1 - VE-5 INJECTION POINT LOCATION (DECEMBER 13-15, 2010) © INJECTION POINT LOCATION (JANUARY 31 TO FEBRUARY 4, 2011) M W-3A' " MW-3B W-1 (VE-1 ) 5 3f,'HT S CA-E •4C RECEIVED IDENRIDWO AQU1F;:R'PRnTFrTIi)N SFCTf4N FEB 10 2011 FIGURE 1 INJECTION POINT LOCATION MAP ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAG U E STREET GREENSBORO, NC REGENOX INJECTION RECOR❑ SUMMARY JANUARY 31, 2011 TO FEBRUARY 4, 2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT POUNDS OF PART A POUNDS OF PART 8 GALLONS OF SOULTION INJECTED CONCENTRATION OF SOLUTION INJECTED BY WEIGHT 1-33 75 75 200 8.88% 1-34 150 150 402 8.83% 1-35 30 30 75 9.42% 1-36 4 4 10 8.87% 1-37 11 11 30 8.87% 1-38 60 60 158 8.97% 1-39 30 30 77 9.23% 1-40 45 45 112 9A9% 1-41 120 120 308 9,22% 1-42 30 30 83 8.58% 1-43 23 23 57 9.34% 1-44 8 8 20 8.87% 1-45 45 45 119 8.98% 1-46 30 30 74 9.64% 1-47 30 30 79 8.96% 1-48 15 15 40 8.77% 1-49 45 45 114 9.34% 1-50 15 15 39 9.11% 1-51 1 1 4 8.54% 1-52 59 59 158 8.78% 1-53 45 45 119 8,94% TOTAL 870 870 2,277 9.04% REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA tNJECTION POINT Id I-33 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to de 1h, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting sDlufian with posilive displacement piston pump START TIMFJDATE 01/31/2011 11:35 END TIMEIDATE 0113412DII 13:25 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part 0 Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate m(psi) Pressure Comments 73 - 14 1 .0 15.0 52 5.80% NRIMM NRIMM Sidewinder set at 3300 m; Continued daylighting at MW 3A 14 15 15.0 15.0 40 8.86% 7 45 Sidewindef set at 2430 m; Began da li htin at MW-3A 15 - 16 1 15.0 1 15-0 1 38 9.26% 1 6.6 1 45 Sidewinder set at 2500 m 16 - 17 15.0 15.0 29 12.10 3.0 47 Sidewinder set at 2500 rpm 17 - 18 1 15.0 1 15.0 1 40 j 8.07% 1 3.0 1 40 j5idevAridef set at 1930 rpm TOTALS 1 5 1 75 1 75 1 1999.8.68% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID I-34 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullin rods and in actin 9 solution with positive dis lacement piston pum START TIMEIDATE 01/31/2011 13,35 END TIMEJDATE 01/31/2011 17:00 Interval Pounds of Pan A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate m) Pressure (E2 Comments 15 - 16 15.0 15.0 40 8.87% NRIMM 45 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 1B - 17 15.0 15.0 40 8,87% NRIMM NRIMM _ Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 17 - 18 15.0 15,0 40 8.87% NRIMM 50 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 18 - 19 15.0 15.0 40 0-87% NRIMM 55 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 19 - 20 15.0 15.0 38 9.29% 81 5o Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 20 - 21 15,0 15.0 38 9,34% 8,8 50 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 21 - 22 15,0 15.0 37 9.69% NRIMM 50 S dewinder set at 1200 Mm 22 - 23 15,0 15.0 46 7.73% 5,3 50 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm 23 - 24 15.0 15.0 38 9.26% 8,0 55 Sidewinder set at 1200 m 24 - 25 15.0 15.0 45 7.90% NRIMM 60 Sidewinder Set at 1200 m JTOTALSJ 10 1 150 150 1 401.95 1 8,83% NRIMM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJEC UON POINT ID 1-35 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth. then exposed iniervals by puRingrods and Injactmg solution with positive dis Iacement pisicn p um START TIMEIDATE 02/01/2011 09-05 END TIMEIDATE 021011201109 30 Approximate Concanlr Wn Gallons of of Solvlion Infection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Pan A of Part B Injected Weight m IM Comments Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm; Stopped daylighting around pad for oI RW-1; Started daylighting about 1 foot inside fence on Canteen 10 - 11 15.0 15.0 37 9.57% 5.0 NRIMM property. 1 Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm; A limited amount of daylighbng 11 - 12 15.0 15.0 38 9.28% 5.5 40 occurred around pad for old RVV-1 TOTALS1 ? J 30 1 30 1 75.3 1 9A29b NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1.35 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullin rods and injecting solution with positive d ispl ace ment piston pum START TIME/DATE 02101/2011 10-00 END TIMEIDATE 02/0112011 10 10 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part 8 injected Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm. Started dayhghting around pad for old 14 - 15 1 3.8 3.8 10 8.87% 5.5 40 RW-1 after injecting -10 qallon5 of solution. TOTALS 1 3.8 3.8 10 8,87% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-37 MET;OD OF INJECTION RPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and iniecting solution wish positive displacement piston pump TART TIM£IDATE 02/01/2011 11:05 ND TIMEIOATE 02/0112011 11-32 After injecting remediation chemicals into 18-19 foot interval, a hatch of grout was injected into 1-37 over 18-19 and 17-18 foot intervals. A total of -39 gallons of grout with 188 pounds of Portland cement was injected. The grout did not daylight at pad for old RW-1 but did daylight between MVV-3A and MW-3B. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval PartA of Pan B Injected Wight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 1200 rpm; Ste Ned daylighUng around pad for old 18 - 19 1 11.3 1 11.3 1 30 8.87°!0 5.6 45 1 RVV-I after in ectin -16 gallons of solution. TOTALS 1 1 11 1 11 30.00 8.87°I NRINM- NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-35 METHOD OF INJECTION' DPT drilled to de th, then exposed intervals by pullin rods and i rijecting solution with posibve d i s ulacement piston pum START TIMEIDATE 02/01/2011 11:35 END TIMEIDATE 0210112011 12:30 11:45 - 02.01-2011 - Mixed -80 gallon batch of solution with 30 pounds of Part A. 30 pounds of Part B. and 188 pounds of Portland cement for 25-26 foot interval. 12:03 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed --130 gallon batch of solution with 30 pounds of Part A. 30 pounds of Part B, and 188 pounds of Portland cement for 24-25 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Infection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight m(psi) Comments Sidevanderset at2800 rpm; At 12:11 dayllghting began alongside pad for RW1. At 1217 daylighting began alongside wastewater 24 - 25 30.0 30.0 80 8.84 % 5.0 NRIMM discharge weir, 25 - 26 30.0 30.0 78 9.11% 5.5 90 Sidewindar set at 2800 rpm TOTALS 2 60 60 158.13 8.97% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-39 METHOD OF INJECTION' DPT drikd to depth. then exposed intervals by ullin reds and in'ectm g solution with positive dis lacement piston porn START TIMEIDATE D210112014 14:00 END TIMEIDATE 02M112011 14:30 14:15 - 02.01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon hatch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 23-24 foot interval. 14:23 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 22-23 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Inlechon Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Bate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B In acted Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm: Daylighting began near VM-I (now ahandoned) almost immediately when injection began on this interval. Pressure drapped to --10 psi after daylighting began. 22 - 23 15.0 15.0 40 8.87% 5.6 40 Throtdled back iri ecton rate to -2 gpm. 23 - 24 15.0 15.0 37 9,63% 5.6 j 40 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm ITOTALS1 2 30 30 75.82 9,23% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT la 1-40 METHOD OF INJECTION. OPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullin rods and infecting solution with osthve displacement piston pum START TIMEJDATE 02101/2011 14:31 ENO TIMEIDATE 02/01/2011 16:05 15:00 - 02-01-2011 - Muted -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part D. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 25-26 fool interval. 15:20 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -8o gallon batch of solution with 30 pounds of Part A, 30 pounds of Part 8, and 188 pounds of Portland cement for 20-25 fool interval. 15:56 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 10-20 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Infected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part H Infected Weight m i Comments 10 - 20 15 15 37.28 9.51'Y 3.0 50 Sidewinder set at 2800 Daylghfing continues adjacent to R Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Daylighting continues adjacent to RW 20 - 25 30.0 1 30.0 1 76 1 9.37% NRIMM I NRIMM 1. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm. At 1& 15 daytighling began adjacent t 25 - 26 15.4 15.0 3H 9.76 3.5 80 RVV-1. ITOTALS1 8 1 45 45 j 112.02 1 9.49% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-41 METHOD OF INJECTION: OPT drilled to de p1h. then exposed intervals by pullm rods and in ecti ng solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 02/0112011 16:22 END TIMEIOATE 02/0212011 10:25 16:25 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Pan B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 24-25 foot interval. 16:45 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 23-24 foot Interval. 17.05 - 02-01-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 22-23 foot interval. 09:45 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution With 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 21-22 foot interval. 09:00 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed --40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 20-21 foot interval. 09:17 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portand cement for 19-20 foot interval. 09:24 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 18-19 foot interval. 09:30 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Parl A. 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 15-18 foot Interval. Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Sotution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Inyected by we' ht Injection Rate m(psi) Pressure Comments 15 - 18 15,0 15.0 39 9.05% 1.75 40 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Day lahling continued at pad for VE-2. 18 - 19 15.0 15.0 37 9,67% NRIMM NRIMM Sidewinder set at 2800 Trn: Began daylighting at pad for VE-2 19 - 20 15.0 15.0 36 9,78% NRIMM NRIMM Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm 20 - 21 15.0 15.0 37 9.64% 5.0 45 Sidewinder set at 2800 Trn 21 - 22 15.0 16.0 40 8,87% NRIMM 50 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm 22 - 23 15.0 15.0 42 8,60% 3.3 50 Sidewinder "tat 2800 rpm 23 - 24 15.0 15.0 39 1 9.20% 3,3 5p Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm 24 - 24 15.0 15.0 38 9.33% 3.6 50 Sidewinder sat at 2800 rpm TOTALS 9 120 120 1 307.55 9.221, NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-42 METHOD OF INJECTION: D P T drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injoChrig solution with positive displacement piston pvm START TIMEIDATE 02/02/2011 10:30 END TIMVDATE 02/02/2011 1125 10:35 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement Tor 18-79 foot interval 11.00 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of sotution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 10-18 fool interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B to eCted Weight m sl Comments 10 - 14 10.5 10,5 27 9.27% 2.O 50 Sidewinder set at 2800 m; Daylighting slowed then stopped. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; After daylrghting started several feet 14 - 16 4-6 4.5 11 8.271J. 2.0 60 away rods were idled to 14 feat. Day qhting slowed. 18 - 19 1KO 15.0 44 7.99% 4,0 65 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm TOTALS 1 9 1 30 1 30 1 83 1 8.58% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 909 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT 10 1-43 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drlted to depth. then exposed intervals by ull Ing rods and Injecting solution with posrtive dis Iacement p iston pum START TIMEIDATE 02/02/2011 11:35 END TIME/DATE 0210212011 13:25 11:35 - 92-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 21-22 foot interval. 1140 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed --20 gallon hatch of solution with 7.5 pounds of Part A, 7,5 pounds of Part B, and 37 pounds of Portland cement for 5-21 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate pressure Interval Part A of Part B In Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2000 rpm; Rods were intiatially pulled to 15 feel, but after daylighting continued, the rods were pulled to 5 feet. 5 - 21 7.5 7.5 20 K87% NRIMM 40 Da ighting continued. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; After injecting -14 gallons of solution, 21 - 22 15.0 1 15.0 37 1 9.60% 1 NR/MM NRIMM da li htin began -4 feet from injection point. 1TOTALSI 17 1 23 1 23 57 1 9.34% NRIMM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT 10 1-44 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth, then ex used intervals b putlrn rods and j pAecting solution anth positivo displacement piston um 'START TIMEIDATE D210212011 13-30 END TIMEIDATE 02/02/2011 13-55 13:30 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -20 gallon batch of solution with 7.5 pounds of Part A, 7.5 pounds of Part 8, and 37.5 pounds of Portland cament for 5-15 foot inlerval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval PartA of Part B Injected Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Rods were intiatially pulled to 14 feet. but after daylighting started almost immadadely, rods were pulled to 9 feet and then 5 feet as daylightmg condnuedafter each pull. 5 - 15 7.5 7.5 20 8,87% NR/MM NRIMM 113aightingoccurred -5 feat from injection Point- Point- TOTALS10 1 7.5 1 7.5 1 20 1 8,870/ TOTALS1 NRiNM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOR INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT la 1-45 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and ircting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIMEJDATE 02/0212011 14:20 END TIMEIDATE 02/02/2011 15.05 14:20 - 02-02-2011 -Mixed -40 gallon batch of solu[ion with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 30-31 foot interval. 14:40 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon belch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 2 9-3 0 foot interval. 14:50 - 02-02-2011 -Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 25-29 foot interval. Approximate Concentraban Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Intacted by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injacted weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 280a rpm; DaylighNng continued in front of SVE 25 - 29 15.o 15.0 37 9.69% 4 1 95 unit and P&T units. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Daylighling began in front of SVE unit door. Daylighting worsened with time. Dylighting began in front of 29 - 30 15.0 1 15.0 1 38 9.24% 4A 90 P&T unit doors_ 30 - 31 15.0 1 15.0 1 44 8.16% 4.1 90 Sidewinder set at 2800 rprrL ITOTALS1 fi 1 45.0 1 45.0 1 118.5 L 8,980I NRINM- NOT RECORCEO OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-46 METHOD OF INJECTION: D P T drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by p Lpll i og rods and i njectrnq solution with positive dis lacament piston pum START TIME/DATE 02M212011 15:16 END TIME/DATE 02102/2011 16:20 15:20 - 02-02-201I -Mixed -40 gallon Latch of solution wkth 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part S. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 23-24 foot interval. 15:45 - 02-02-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 5-23 foot interval Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm. Daylighting continued under plastic 5 15 3.3 3.3 0 9,92% NRIMM NRIMM AST, but at a rate slower than before. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm: Daylighting continued under plastic 15 - 22 6.3 6.3 15 9.92% NRIMM NRIMM AST. Pulled rods to 5 feat. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Daytighting began to occur under plastic AST. Daytighting was heavy apparently due to vigorous 22 - 23 5.4 5.4 13 9.92% 4 100 reaction with remediadon chemicals, Putled rods to 15 feet Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Daylighting through 14$- Stopped injection for 12 minutes to allow hole plug to swell more. After 23 - 24 15.0 15.0 38 9.38°I 4,0 90 k injection was re -started daylig htJ ng did not occur at 1-45 TOTALS 19 30.0 30.0 73.5 9.64% NRrNM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC $09 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT IA 1-47 ME7H00 OF INJECTION DP 7 drilled to de th. then exposed intervals by pullingrods and PNertinq solution with posrttve displacement piston pump START TIMEIDATE 02102/2011 16.30 END TIME/DATE 02fO3/2011 10:00 0905 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 23-24 foot interval. 0915 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of sotution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds or Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 10-23 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A cf Part B Injected Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Initially pulled rods to 22 feet. 0ayiighting beneath plastic AST began immediately, Pulled rods to 20 feet and dayfightin9 continued; Pulled rods to 10 feet and 10 - 23 15.0 15.0 42 8.45% NRIMM NRIMM da li htm a subsided somewhat. 23 - 24 15.0 15.0 37 1 9.51%c 3.8 1 80 1 Sidewinder set at 2800 rprn ITOTALSI 14 1 30.0 30.0 1 79.2 1 8.96% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENO1t INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-48 METHOD OF INJECTION DPT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pullin rods and in*cling solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 021a312011 10 15 END TWEIDATE 02/0312011 10'50 1015 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 10-15 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gatlonsof of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B In acted We ht m(psi) Comments 10 - 14 5.8 5.8 18 8.77% 1.8 35 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm 1Sidewindersetat2800rpm: Began dayhghting at comer of 14 - 15 9.2 9,2 25 8.77% 1.8 35 building.Pulled rods to 10 feet. ITOTALS1 5 15.0 1 15.0 1 40.5 8.77% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1419 METHOD OF INJECTION DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and inlecbng solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIMEIDATE 02/03/2011 11:10 END TIMEfDATE 02403/2011 14:04 1110 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of pan B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 29-30 foot interval. 1160 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed --40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of PartA, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of PorlIand cement for 29-30 toot interval. 1340 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 29-30 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Galleons of of Solution Infection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B In clad Weight m(psi) Comments 15 - 20 15.0 15.0 38 9,40% NRIMM NRIMM Sidewnder set at 2800 m; B n da i htin near MWAA. i ew n er set a 2 rpm; a ig ting un er asticAS f 20 29 15.0 15.0 34 10.32% 1.8 35 subsided somevAid, Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm, After -25 gallons infected, daylighting 29 - 30 15.0 15.0 42 8.48%h 1 2-0 1 NRIMM Lbegan under antic AST. TOTALS i5 45.0 45.0 113.9 9.34% NRINM-NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURE❑ REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC S09 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT IO 1-50 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT dnlled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement pistori pump START TIMeDATE 02/0312011 14:15 END TlME1DATE 02/03/2011 15:10 1415 - 02-03-2011 -Mixed -40 gallon balch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 15-20 toot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallopsof of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval PartA of Part B In acted Weight my s1 Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm', Began daylighhng through 1-47; Stopped injecting for 10 minutes to allow hole plug to seat 1-47. 15 - 20 15.0 15.0 39 9.11% NRIMM 40 Coninued to dayl ight throw h 1-47. ITOTALS1 5 15.0 15.0 39.0 9.11% NR1NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, WORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT iD 1-51 METHOD OF INJECTION: OPT drilled to depth, then expo sed intervals by puIling rods and in ecti ng sdution with positive dis lacement pr5too pum START TIME/DATE 02103/2011 14:15 END TIMEIDATE 02/03/2011 15:10 1415 - 02-43-2011 - Mixed -4 gallon batch of solution with 1.5 pounds of Part A. 1.5 pounds of Part B, and -B pounds of Panland cement for 11-12 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight m sr Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Began daylighting through 1-47; Stopped injecting for 10 minutes to allow hole plug to seal 1-47. 11 - 12 1.5 1.5 4 6.54 % 2,3 40 Con inued to daylight th roug h 1-47; Moved off hole. TOTALS 1 1.5 1.5 4.1 6.54% NRINM- NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-52 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to de th, then exposed intervals by puilingrods and injecting solution with positive dis lacement piston pump START TIMEIAATE 07JO312011 1600 ENO TIMEIDATE 02/04/2011 10:03 1415 - 02-03-2011 - Mixed -35 gallon batch of solution with 13.5 pounds of Part A. 13.5 pounds of Part B. and - 8 5 pounds of Portland cement for 28-29 foot interval. 1830 - 02-03-2n11 -Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 27-28 fool interval. 0045 - 02-04.2.011 -Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part D. and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 25-27 foot interval. 0930 - 02-04-2011 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement for 5-25 foot interval. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solulwn fnlected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight m(psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm, Intially interval was set at 15-25, but after daylighting continued, the rods were pulled to 5 feet. Daylighfing continued at plastic AST and then began a few feet Tram 5 - 25 15.0 15.0 40 8.87% NRIMM NRIMM injection point. Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Began daylightng at VE-3 after 25 - 27 15.0 15,0 41 8.75% NRIMM 80 n actin -25 alions into this rnlerval. Sidewinder set at 2BOO rpm. Began daylighbng along edge of pavement near P&T building, Began daylrghting beneath plastic 27 - 28 15.0 15.0 40 8.94% NRIMM NRIMM AST 28 - 29 13.5 13.5 38 8.54% 2.0 40 Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm TOTALS1 1 58.5 1 58.5 1 157,8 1 8.78%Y NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 609 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-53 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullirip rods and in ecti ng solution with p2sitive d ispi acement piston pum START TIMEIDATE 0210412G11 10:25 END TIME/DATE 02104l2011 11:55 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part 8 Injected Weight m (psi) Comments Sidewinder set at 2800 rpm; Interval initially set at 25-26. Began daylightmg at VM-3 after injecting -7 gallons into 25-26 interval. 20 - 26 15.0 15.0 41 8.75% NRIMM NRIMM Pulled rods to 20 feet and finished injectng batch, 26 - 27 15.0 15.0 37 9.569E NRIMM NRIMM Sidevvindersetat2800rprlT 27 - 28 15.0 15.0 42 8.55% 4.3 1 45 1 Sidewinder set at 2804 rprrk ITOTALS1 8 45.0 45.0 119.1 8,94°I NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED A Prolft ron81 bmrtetl Lidt-kry Company January 23, 2011 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWQ 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1636 Via email michael.ro ers ncdenr. ov) and US Mail Re- injection Event Summary L �` L `. December 13 to 15, 2010 Application No. W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this correspondence for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Car r Apparel. LLC (ARAMARK). Nesco Environmental was at the referenced site for the second of'three planned injection events during the period December 13, 2010 to Dec mber'1 �2010. � Nesco Environmental subcontracted Geologic Exploration Company of Statesvitle, North Carolina to advance borings by direct -push technology (DPT), to mix REGENOX solution, and inject REGENOX solution into the subsurface through the DPT borings. Environmental and Geologic Services PG Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 RECEIVEL3�i7FNR�DVvur Email nescoenv@carolina.rr-com ARuifQr Pret�N,'�n fia�IDri JAN 25 ��14 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR January 23. 2011 Page 2 Attached is a figure which shows the locations of the injection points. Also attached are a REGENOX Injection Record Summary and a REGENQX Injection Record each injection point. Due to inclement weather (freezing rain) on the morning of December 1E, 2010, GEX was not able to travel to the project site. Consequently. the second injection event was terminated before the planned number of injection points was completed or the planned mass of remediation chemicals was injected. If additional information is necessary, or should you have any questions concerning this project. please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESCQ ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President cc: Sam Niemann - The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang - NCDENR (via email) JPy:;pn2G11ol23 RECEIVED I OENR I DWp Aquifar arm,,mr--,r �-Mion JAN 25 �01# N A RAMAR K M W-2 E EXISTING FENCE EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING Ml �V� -2A MW-2A EXISTING WATER TABLE WELL O MW-26 EXISTING MONITORING WELL (NON -WATER TABLE) VE-S aVE-3 EXISTING VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL d VM-1 EXISTING VACUUM MONITORING PROBE zo M W - 4 A� [-�B I IS RW- 1 EXISTING RECOVERY WELL MW-3K M W-3 B 'RW-1 (VE-1) 5 30 !:ET SCF:E �'•a[ W-2 (VE-7) X MW-2A ABANDONED WATER TABLE WELL 0 MW-28 ABANDONED MONITORING WELL (NON -WATER TABLE) INJECTION POINT LOCATION (NOVEMBER 15-19. 2010) 7. INJECTION POINT LOCATION (OECEmBER 13-15. 2010) FIGURE 1 Nzaim INJECTION POINT LOCATION MAP ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NC CEIVEU 1 DENR / DWQ uifer PrOfPrtlon Sertion JAN 25 2011 REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-20 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 10.15 END TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 10:50 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments Began daylighting around pad for old RW-1 after injecting - 14 gallons into 10-15 foot interval. Pulled rods to 5 feet. Slowed 5 - 15 15 15 35 10.13% 5 NRIMM pumping rate to -2.5 pm. Daylighting continued. TOTALS 10 15 15 35 10.13% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-21 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and in eclinq solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 10:55 END TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 11:10 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments 5 - 12 15 15 37 9,59% 2 NR1MM Be an daylighting at corner of building after —15 gallons injected. TOTALS 7 15 15 37 9.59% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-22 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by ullin rods and injecting solution with eositivtjLsklacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 11.15 ,END TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 11.55 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments Began daylighting at 1-21 immediately after pumping intiated. Put hole plug in 1-21 and continued pumping. Daylighlting contiued at i- 21, albeit not as bad as before. Began daylighting at corner of 5 - 14 15 15 35 9.71% 2 NR/MM -building. TOTALS 9 15 15 3E 9.71 % NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-23 METHOD OF INJECTION. DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 12-00 END TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 14:40 MW Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (pm) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 15 15 36 9,93% 2.5 NRIMM Began clayfighting around pad for RVV-1 10 - 15 15 15 38 9.35% 2.5 NRIMM 15 - 20 15 15 37 9.51% 2.5 NRIMM 20 - 23 15 15 37 9.61% 2.5 NRIMM J TOTALS 18 60 60 148 9.59% 1 NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-24 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 14:45 END TIME/DATE 12113/201 D 15:40 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate {gpm] Pressure (psi) Comments 15 - 20 15 15 3$ 1 9,34% 2.0 1__NR/MM jDaylightingcontinued at VM-1 20 - 27 30 30 75 9.47% 1 NRIMM I NRIMM After —73 gallons was injected, daylighting began at VM-1 IF TOTALS 12 45 45 113 9.43% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-25 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 15A5 END TIME/DATE 12/13/2010 16 30 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part S Gailons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate [gpm) Pressure (psi) Comments 15 - 20 11.25 11.25 28 9.49% 20 NRIMM Da l iahtiM continued at VM-1 20 - 27 18.75 18.75 52 8.61 % NRIMM I NRIMM After —52 gallons was in ected, da li htin began at VM-1 J TOTALS1 12 30 1 30 1 80 1 8.92% 1 111.171i•1re01:0r:7more] :Z9]amI010ON W11iLVilW-11610WaQ REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-26 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 09:00 END TIMEIDATE 12/14/2010 09:20 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight m(psi) Comments Began injecting into 10-16.5 foot interval. After —4 gallons injected, daylighting began around pad for old RW-1. Pulled rods to 5 feet and continued to inject. Daylighting continued. Stopped injecting 5 - 16.5 2.33 2.33 6 8.87% NR/MM NRIMM after 6.22 gallons were injected. TOTALS 11.5 1 2.33 2.33 6 8.87% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-27 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIMEIDATE 12/14/2010 09:25 END TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 10:29 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate m)(psi) Pressure Comments 5 - 10 1 1 4 6.33% NRIMM NRIMM Continued daylighting around pad for RW-1 10 15 6.5 6.5 18 8.57% NR/MM NRIMM Began da li htin around ad for RW-1 15 - 26 15 15 60 5.93%fl NRIMM NRIMM 26 - 27 15 15 19 18.81 % NRIMM NRIMM 27 - 28 12.67 12.67 31 9.51% NRIMM NRIMM TOTALS 23 50.17 50.11 132 1 9.00%0 NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-28 METHOD OF INJECTION. DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 10-30 END TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 10A0 NEEMEMNi Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate {gpmy Pressure (psi) Comments 10 18 0.75 0.75 5 3.26% NR/MM NRIMM 18 19 6.75 6.75 18 8.65% NRIMM NRIMM Began dayhghting at VM-1; Pulled rods to 15 feet and continued pumping. Dayfighting continued at VM-1. Pulled rods to 10 feet. 19 - 20 7.5 7.5 16 10.96% NRIMM NRIMM 20 21 7.5 7.5 23 7.89% NRIMM NRIMM 21 - 22 7.5 7.5 17 10.61% NRIMM NRIMM 22 - 23 7.5 7.5 20 8.84% NRIMM NRIMM 23 - 24 7.5 7.5 17 10.70% 3 NRIMM 1TOTALSJ 14 37.50 1 37.50 1 92 9.64% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-29 METHOD OF INJECTION- DPT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 11,50 EN❑ TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 14,00 Approximate Concentration Gallons ❑f of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments 12 - 17 5.3 5.3 13 9.95% 2 NRIMM Began claylighting through cracks in asphalt near injection point. After pumping -22 gallons, daylighting began at corner fencepost at 17 - 18 9.7 9.7 23 9.95% NRIMM I NRIMM JAIltel site. TOTALS 6 1 15.00 1 15.00 36 9.95% NRIMM - NOT RECORDED ❑R NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-30 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 14 A0 END TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 14.55 1420 - 12-14-2010 - Mixed —40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight Wpm) (psi) Comments Daylighting stopped at original location between 1- 15 and 1-17 and 10 - 15 6.3 6.3 16A7 8.98% 2 NRIMM then began at corner of building- 15 - 17 0.6 0.6 1.69 8.98% 2 NRIMM Daylighting continued. Pulled rods to 10 feet. 17 - 18 0.6 0.6 1.52 8.98% 2 NRIMM ❑a Ii tin continued. Pulled rods to 15 feet. Began dayiighting between 1-15 and 1-17 after 19.84 gallons 18 - 19 7.5 7.5 19.84 8.98% NRIMM NRIMM injected. Pulled rods to 17 feet. TOTALS 9 15 15 39.52 8.99% mom NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-31 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injectinginjecfing solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 12/14/2010 15.00 END TIMEIDATE 12/15/201fl 11:25 1500 - 12-14-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part S, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1545 - 12-14-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of PartA and 15 pounds of Part B (No Portland cement). 0840 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1000 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -50 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. Interval Pounds of PartA Pounds of Part 8 Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight injection Rate (my(psi) Pressure Comments 5 13 4.2 42 13.5 7.39% NRIMM NRIMM 13 15 1.7 1.7 5.55 7.39% NRIMM NRIMM 15 17 3.1 3.1 9.95 7.39% NRIMM NRIMM 17 19 3.0 3.0 9.55 7.39% NRIMM NRIMM Daylighting. continued near injection point. Pulled rods to 15 feet 19 20.5 3.0 3.0 9.55 7.39% 2.6 NRIMM Began daylighting near injection point. Pulled rods to 17 feet. 20.5 22 8.9 8.9 31.76 6.66% NRIMM NRIMM 22 - 23 6.1 6.1 21.68 6.66°Ia NRIMM NRIMM 23 - 24 7.2 7.2 18.94 9.05% 2.0 1 NRIMM Began dayiighting west of plastic AST but not as bad as previous day. Then, dayligNjnq west of plastic AST stopped, 24 - 25 7.8 7.8 20.26 9.05% 2.0 1 NRIMM 25 - 26 7.2 7.2 19.18 8.87% NRIMM NRIMM Began daylighting west of plastic AST after a total of 77.10 gallons injected into 1-31. Quit for the day to allow grout to set up overnight- A total of 82.79 gallons injected into 1-31 on 12-14-2010 26 - 27 7.8 7.8 2080. 8.87% NRIMM NRIMM 27 28 7.7 7.7 22.10 8.29°In NRIMM NRIMM 28 29 7.3 7.3 2071. 8.29% 1,75 1 NRIMM TOTALS f 24 75 1 75 1 223.54 1 7,95% NRIMM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-32 METHOD OF INJECTION: OPT drilled to depth. then exposed intervals by pu[lin rods and i njecting solution with positive dis lacemen! pistGn pum START TIMEIDATE 12 I512010 11:30 END TIMEIDATE 12/1512010 16 25 1130 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1215 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1330 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1353 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1400 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -55 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1433 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -45 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1500 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -45 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part B, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1505 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -45 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part B. and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1517 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -45 gallon batch of solution wish 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland camant. 1530 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -45 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A. 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1545 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1600 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 15 pounds of Part A, 15 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. 1607 - 12-15-2010 - Mixed -40 gallon batch of solution with 30 pounds of Part A. 30 pounds of Part 8, and 94 pounds of Portland cement. Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part 8 Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Sd0on injected by Weight Injection Rate m Pressure si Comments 5 8 30 30 48.6 14.48% NRIMM NR/MM 8 - 9 7.8 7.8 21,0 8.76% NRIMM NRIMM 9 10 7.2 7.2 19.5 8.76% NRIMM NRIMM 10 - 11 5.5 5.5 13.2 9.76% NRIMM NRIMM 11 - 12 9.5 9.5 23.1 9.76% NRIMM NRIMM 12 - 13 7.2 7.2 20.1 8.51% NRIMM NRIMM 19 - 14 7.8 7.8 21.6 8.51% NRIMM NRIMM 14 - 15 15.0 15.0 43.6 8.14% NRIMM NRIMM 15 - 16 0.4 8.4 26.2 7.88% NRIMM NRIMM 16 - 17 1 6.6 6.6 19.9 7,88% NRIMM NRIMM 17 - 18 15.0 15.0 41.8 8.49% NRIMM NRIMM 18 - 19 8.5 8.5 24.6 8.23% NRIMM NRIMM 19 - 20 6.5 6.5 18.6 8,23% NRIMM NRIMM 20 - 21 6.7 6.7 17.2 9.15% NRIMM NRIMM 21 - 22 1.2 1.2 3.0 9.15% 4 NRIMM 22 - 23 6,5 6.5 7.2 8.93% NRIMM NRIMM 23 - 24 8.5 8.5 22.6 8,93% NRIMM NRIMM 24 - 25 5,9 5.9 116A 8.47% NRIMM NRIMM 25 - 26 9.1 1 9.1 1 25,54 8.47% NRIMM NRIMM 26 - 27 1 0 15.0 52.81 6,74% NRIMM NRIMM 27 - 28 7.9 7.9 24.40 7,70% NRIMM NRIMM 28 - 29 7.1 7.1 21.75 7.70% NRIMM NRJMM TOTALS 24 203 203 541,65 8.86% NRIMM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED PmMss�onri Ll"wWd LLadlilj C_U rPan, December 12, 2010 Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section North Carolina DENR-DWG 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Via email (michael,roQers(c-_Dncdenr gov) and US Mail Re: Injection Event Summary r � Application No. W10400140 ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC 509 Teague Street Greensboro, North Carolina NCDENR Incident No. 5540 Dear Mr. Rogers: Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this correspondence for The Wetlands Company, LLC on behalf of ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (ARAMARK). Nesco Environmental was at the referenced site for the first of three planned injection events during the period November 15, 2010 to November 19, 2010. Nesco Environmental subcontracted Geologic Exploration Company of Statesville, North Carolina to advance borings by direct -push technology (DPT), to mix REGENOX solution, and inject REGENOX solution into the subsurface through the DPT borings. Environmental and Geolo is Services P❑ Box 78222 Charlotte, NC 28271 + 2416 River Oaks Drive Waxhaw, NC 28173 Phone 704-442-1365 + Fax 704-243-5024 Email nescoenv@caroiina.rr.com Mr. Michael Rogers NCDENR December 12, 2010 Page 2 Attached is a figure which shows the locations of the injection paints. Also attached are a REGENOX Injection Record Summary and a REGENOX Injection Record each injection point. If additional information is necessary, or should you have any questions concerning this project, please contact me at (704) 442-1365. Sincerely, NESC❑ ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.0 r Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. President cc: Sam Niemann — The Wetlands Company, LLC (via email) Shuying Wang — NCDENR (via email) JPWljpn 20101212 0 ARAMARK MW-2B _ EMSTwO FENCE BUILDING M W-2A [� • Lew- 2A Ex15TYiG BLRI.EMNG ExISTRlG WATER TABLE WELL O MW-29 ExrtwO ~O"c WELL (T10R-WATER TABLE) VE-6 • VE-3 EMSTM VAPOR J:%MAC1x7H WELL MW 4 MW-4A 4 VI,1- 1 Ex4TwG VACUUM I/ WORING PROBE VE-4g ORW—, Exis„rrc RECOVERY WEu VE— x raw-2A AB N00"ED WATER TABLE WELL W-2 (VE-7) VM-2 �( MW-28 ABANDONED MON"R■*G WELL (NON -WATER TABLE) VE- VE-5 KXCTIOR MNI LoranpN (WVFMBER 15-19, 70101 VM-1 = ':'<RW-1 (VE-1) M W-3 MW-3B FIGURE 4 INJECTION POINT LOCATION MAP ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO,NC REGENOX INJECTION RECORD SUMMARY ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT POUNDS OF PART A POUNDS ❑F PART 6 GALLONS OF SOLLTION INJECTE❑ APPROXIMAIE CONCENTRATION ❑F SOLUTION INJECTED BY WEIGHT 1-1 12❑ 120 170 16.52% 1-2 120 120 295 9.61% 1-3 30 30 73 9.70% 1-4 30 30 85 8.38% 1-5 30 30 67 10.63% 1-6 120 120 275 10.29% 1-7 150 150 202 17.32% 1-8 120 120 351 8.10% 1-9 90 90 184 11.52% 1-10 253 253 405 14.66% 1-11 30 30 88 8.03% 1-12 60 60 135 10,49% 1-13 179 179 234 17.87% 1-14 300 300 203 33.79% 1-15 60 60 60 23.17% 1-16 120 120 100 27.63% 1-17 120 120 100 27.63% 1-18 180 180 247 17.02% 1-19 120 120 182 15.45% MW4A 78 78 130 14.09% TOTAL 2,310 2,310 3,586 15,10% REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-1 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 11:30 END TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 12:38 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part i3 Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (pm) Pressure psi Comments 5 - 1 D 30 30 42 16.71 % 9.00 NR/NM Daylighting began through cracks in asphalt and outside fence. 10 - 15 30 30 42 16.71 % 9.25 NRINM 15 - 20 30 30 43 16.33% 6.25 NRINM 20 - 25 30 30 43 16.33% 6.50 NRINM ITOTALS1 20 1 120 1 120 1 170 1 16.52% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-2 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 13:30 END TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 15:30 Interval Pounds of Part A pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate m Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 30 30 73 9.74% 8.50 60 10 - 15 30 30 69 10.34% &00 50 15 - 20 30 30 73 9,65% 8.00 50 20 - 23 30 30 81 8.82% 9.00 85 TOTALS 18 120 120 295.19 9.61 °/o NR1NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAkEER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-3 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 16:15 END TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 16:40 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Salutian Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight pm (psi) Comments 10 - 15 30 30 73 9.70°/a 9.00 1 90 JDaylighted around 2ad for old RW-1 J 1TOTALS1 5 1 30 1 30 1 73.04 1 9.70% 1 NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ I-4 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/15/2010 16:45 END TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 08:55 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate pm) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 15 15 35 10.21 % t 8.00 60 10 - 14 15 15 50 7.11 % 1 8.50 80 TOTALS1 9 1 30 1 30 1 84.7 1 8.38% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA NJECTION POINT ID 1-5 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump 7TART TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 09:00 -_ND TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 09:40 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B In ected Weight pm)(psi) Comments Began by injecting into 15-21 foot interval. Daylighting began around pad for ❑ld RW-1 after 44 gallons injected while injecting into 15-21 foot interval. Reduced flow rate to 4 gpm at 25 psi but daylinghting continued. Pulled rods to 5 feet and injected the 15 - 21 30 30 67 10.63% 9.00 90 remainder onf the batch into 1-5. ITOTALS1 6 30 30 67 10.63% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID I-6 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 09:45 END TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 11 A0 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (gpm) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 30 30 49 14.37% 3.00 20 10 - 15 30 30 72 9.85% 5.00 50 Began daylighIting around old RW-1 pad and around fence post. 15 - 20 30 30 78 9.12% 5.00 50 20 - 26 30 30 77 9.27% 5.00 50 TOTALS 21 120 120 275 10.29% 1 J NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-7 METHOD OF INJECTION: OPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 12:45 END TIMEIDATE 11/16/2010 14:40 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments 5 - 25 120 120 127 21.96% 3.25 15 Da I hted around pad for VE-2. Daylghted around pad for VM-1 at end of injection for this interval. 25 - 29 30 30 76 9.39% 6.00 50 Pulled rods to 5 feet. TOTALS 24 150 150 202 17.326/6 NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC +509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-8 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/16/2010 14:45 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 09:25 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (gpm) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 10 30 30 76 9.37% 6.50 40 10 15 30 30 102 6.94% 5.00 NR/NM 15 - 20 30 30 91 7.83% 4.00 30 20 - 25 30 30 82 8.66% 4.00 35 TOTALS 20 120 120 351 8.10% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-9 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and in ecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 0930 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 11:00 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval 1 Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments Daylighting continued around pad for RW-1. Throttled pumping 5 - 15 30 30 43 16.50% 4.00 20 ra to back to 3 gpm. 15 - 20 30 30 73 9.67% 4.50 20 Daylighting continued around pad for RW-1. Pulled rods to 5 feet. 20 - 23 30 30 68 10.37% 5.00 20 Da li hted around pad for RW-1. ITOTALS1 18 1 90 1 90 1 184 1 11.52% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-10 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and idecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIMEIDATE 11/17/2010 10:25 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 15:30 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (g m) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 39 39 77 11.94% 3.00 NR/MM 10 - 15 39 39 77 11.98% 3.00 NRIMM 15 - 20 58 58 82 16.54% 3.00 NRIMM 20 - 25 58 58 79 17.17% 3.00 NRIMM 25 - 32 59 59 90 15.32°Ia 3.20 NRIMM TOTALS 27 1 253 1 253 1 405 1 14.66°Io NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-11 METHOD OF INJECTION. ❑PT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pulling rods and in ectin solution withpositive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 11:05 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 12:20 Mod Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by mate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments Daylighting continued around pad for RW-1, then it stopped at pad 5 - 20 1 15 1 15 55 6.53% 1 0.60 1 NR/NM Ifor RW-1 and started at VM-1. 20 - 25 1 15 1 15 34 10.43°/0 3.00 20 jDaylighted around pad for RW-1. Pulled rods to 5 feet. TOTALS 1 20 1 30 1 30 88 8.03% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-12 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by polling rods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIMEIDATE 11/17/2010 16:20 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 17:05 Interval Pounds of Pail A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate (gpm) Pressure (psi) Comments 10 - 15 30 30 75 9.451Io NR/MM NRIMM Daylighting began around builcing foundation. Stopped injecting. 15 - 18 30 30 60 11.78% NRIMM NRIMM TOTALS1 $ 1 60 1 60 1 135 1 10,49% NRJNM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-13 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and in ecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 16:23 END TIMEIDATE 11/18/2010 10:35 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution Injected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate tgpmj Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 10 30 30 35.65 19,60% 3.00 NRIMM 10 - 15 30 30 42.67 16.45% 3.00 NRIMM 15 - 20 30 30 44.27 15.87% 3.00 NRIMM Daylighting around pad for VE-3 20 - 25 45 45 40.60 25.60% 4.00 45 Daylighting behind P&T equipment building. Reduce pumping rate to 3 gpm. 25 - 29 44 44 70.69 14.60% NRIMM NRIMM Batch includes leftover material from 1-12 which was not injected at 1-12 due to daylighting issue at building foundation. TOTALS 24 179 179 1 233.88 17.87% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-14 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 10:45 END TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 12:50 Interval Pounds of Part A Pounds of Part B Gallons of Solution In ected Approximate Concentration of Solution Injected by Weight Injection Rate pm) Pressure (psi) Comments 5 - 15 120 120 53.55 49.92°I6 5.00 NR/MM 15 - 25 120 120 73.46 37.09% NRIMM NRIMM 25 - 29 60 60 75.57 18.52% NRIMM NRIMM Flow meter not registering. ITOTALS1 24 1 300 1 300 1 202.58 1 33.79% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ I-15 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 12:55 END TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 13:15 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part R Injected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments I Dayligthing around building foundation. Decided not to inject more 15 - 22 60 60 60 23.17% 1 NRINM NR/NM linto this DPT boring. TOTALS 7 1 60 1 60 60 1 23.17% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-16 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 14:15 END TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 15:20 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight pm) (psi) Comments 5 - 20 60 60 50 27.63% 3.00 NRIMM Daylighted along building foundation behind plastic AST. Pulled 20 - 25 60 60 50 27.63% 3.00 NRIMM rods to 5 feet. TOTALS1 20 1 120 1 120 100 1 27.63% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT I❑ 1-17 METHOD OF INJECTION: ❑PT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 15:25 END TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 16:40 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part E Injected Weight pm) (psi) Comments 5 - 20 60 60 50 27.63% NR/MM Daylighted around pad for VE-3. Then daylighting a few feet from I- 17 and then at foundation at corner of boiler room. Pulled rods to 5 20 - 29 60 60 50 27.63% NRIMM feet. TOTALS1 24 1 120 1 120 1 100 1 27,63% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECOR❑ ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-18 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingroofs and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/18/2010 16:45 END TIME/DATE 11/19/2010 10:00 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B Injected Weight ( pm) (psi) Comments Began daylighting in front of building with P&T equipment. Began 5 - 10 30 30 30 23.24% NRIMM NRIMM daylighting a few feet from 1-18. 10 - 20 60 60 58 24.06% NRIMM NRIMM Began daylighting along fence post while injecting 15 to 20 foot 20 - 23 90 90 160 13.26% NRIMM NRIMM TOTALS 18 180 180 247 17.02% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURE❑ CALCULATION OF CONCENTRATION OF SOLUTION ASSUMES THAT THE DENSITY OF SOLUTION IS THAT OF WATER AND RESULTS IN A VALUE SOMEWHAT HIGHER THAN ACTUAL CONCENTRATION. REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID 1-18 METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/1912010 10:00 END TIME/DATE 11/19/2010 12:00 Approximate Concentration Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Interval Part A of Part B In ected Weight (gpm) (psi) Comments 5 - 10 30 30 50 14.09% 2 NRIMM Continued daylighting near plastic AST. 15 - 25 30 30 66 10.72% NRIMM NRIMM Continued daylighting near plastic AST. Began daylighting in front of building with SVE equipment. Began 25 - 28 60 60 66 21 A 3% NRIMM NRIMM daylighting near plastic AST. ITOTALS1 23 1 120 1 120 1 182 1 15.45% NR/NM - NOT RECORDED ❑R NOT MEASURED REGENOX INJECTION RECORD ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL, LLC 509 TEAGUE STREET GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA INJECTION POINT ID MW-4A METHOD OF INJECTION: DPT drilled to depth, then exposed intervals by pullingrods and injecting solution with positive displacement piston pump START TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 15:20 END TIME/DATE 11/17/2010 15:50 Approximate Concentration F71nterval Gallons of of Solution Injection Pounds of Pounds Solution Injected by Rate Pressure Part A of Part B Injected Weight m si Comments Well cap ruptured after pumping approximately 130 gallons into 20 - 30 78 78 130 14.09% 5 50 well. TOTALS1 10 1 7$ 1 78 1 130 1 14,09% NRINM - NOT RECORDED OR NOT MEASURED Rogers, Michael From: Joseph P. Nestor [nescoenv@carolina.rr.comj Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 10:49 PM To: Rogers, Michael Cc: Wang, Shuying; 'Sam Niemann' Subject: ARAMARK - GREENSBORO - Application No. W 10400140 - iNJECTION SUMMARY Attachments: 2010-12-12 - Injection Event Summary - November 15 to 19, 2010.pdf Mr. Rogers: Attached is a summary of the first of three planned injection events which took place during the period November 15 to 19, 2010 at the referenced location. I will forward hard copies to you and Ms. Wang as well. Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. PO Box 78222 Charlotte, North Carolina 28271 704 442 1365 (Work) 704 737 4046 (Mobile) ne scoen vA ca rol i na. rr. cam 51 Final Project Evaluation (FPE) Checklist Permittee/Applicant: n Permit No.: WI 0 6 Dry O S -- Reviewer, 5 it -n sic _ 5,h Date: 11 2-2 0 1. Permit issued date: Z d 3 126 10 Expiration date: 7Z 3! 2 0 12- 2. BIMS: Check to see if there is a current renewal Application for this permit number under review or newer permit issued (search by facility address). If this is case, no FPE is needed at this time. 3. Intent of Permittee for this site (i.e., permit complete and no further injection activities planed, future injection activities are planned, permit to be renewed, etc.): 4. FPE or equivalent received? N Date rec'd: sent: . Date received: S. Proposed monitoring reports received for most part? . If FPE or AI is needed, date 6. Proposed sampling frequency complied with (e.g, monitored for 4 quarters)? 7. Proposed parameters analyzed? 8. Any clear evidence of daughter products? If evident, RD may want to review. 9. GW-1s or equivalent received? Date: `As Built' well construction info entered into RIMS? ; Date: 10. Status of injection wells (i.e., active- to be use as monitoring wells, abandoned, etc.} 11. If abandoned, GW-30s Records received? Date: Status entered/changed into BIMS? Date: 12. (Note- if we have not received GW-1 s130s for DPT wel Is, and obtaining these records is problematic, injection well status forms (GW-68) may suffice. Bottom line, we need some kind of a retard, even a -mail from the Permitteelconsultant, with info on when the well points were plugged.) 13. Any outstanding NOVs in BIMS? 14. Completion Letter Sent date Notes: BIMS updated -'Permit Completed' Revised 9-20-2016