760012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201124

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: \ Arrival Time: Departure Time: —T County: Region: S
Farm Name: �U E—.Q � r� 5 nTt fyv�ses Owner Email:
Owner Name: A k son "r0y"l n kLq Phone:
Mailing Address: (�5 -1cjD V VW`4 y, M i4Y-td kt mCk 0
Physical Address: b d 6F V CM 4 v— ✓y\ 1 k 1 Q- nck It YY10.n I V G
Facility Contact: -4Y'A mQ n Title: Phonel" I — ar�q — 0�f2�
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: i YY) S�GII� -bl Certification Number:
Location of Farm: or0KC(Se Y Latitude: 3_1�-) bl�� (� L)
Longitude: --7g050' (N)
vs y 3l 65 +o V-arALQ-wu-\ Q,/-"-� -Ivrn (z wUll�e Mill P-�.
h'Hty -Pa.
a t,+
v
RI
..57i !.
4y;
Wean to Finish La er
Dairy Cow t
Wean to Feeder Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
i� i 4,�{,t
Farrow to Wean ' F' D Cow
L P %�G rv�n i¢+'* 9 � ,
k t x , ! Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder x
s k!
t
Farrow to Finish La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
�`
�; a Turke
£Fxkwdl+6 di ^' +i+M
MOther
�h
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number:'� jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes t� No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: (OoCT&A-e- Sr, . Sat)
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
�\ +
Observed Freeboard (in): _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): co I� sl I,Q�►C� ► •aYa 1� 31 ` oe /—, l d\1t\'--r'VZVD
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP [I Checklists []Design ❑ Maps [—]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes I
No
%Waste Application [ 0 Weekly Freeboard Kwaste Analysis 1� Soil Analysis E W su zanefers
Rainfall Stocking gCrop Yield Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 777' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
ro Weather Code
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [7 No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
■ I III I I I ��AAIIIAA■■Allll■ A II II IIU I AI I I II■1 IJIIUw■AIIIA,I�AA■II■IIIA IIII�III�1 ■I■■II
Comments (refer to question #)z Explain any YES answers and/or any add#tionat recommendations,or any oth�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
TO; 15 j ol �� i5
�I .ea r
Cr��-07-+�afL�^ � o�,+- Labs
Yf � ► � v�
''�+- I C,�l•�
'n �'��•
�r
z -c � vm �.{- ,R bin
� .a � � � V �k�i�%i 11 t��.:2,� O��l L C'�, �
3.5?b b
r
C ov c'A'A� CY) ? rno-n6CA-S V\S 1 b1� VAS1
1- d r _ n + �\ca , n 4-e n r.,_nc_2 ? �
( 1 5�2 Gurlal.jSis Ulb 6Y�1L1 �+') �o`idS — j0.b(�1�J-c�p�JY� � �•,�10-+-j Q� 0V
,�5,�
l m,.an in „XO-e- plan Y1CV_a-
h�e�
Gan Cam- I 0v Z/,r p� p� C C,,_-k— an VV US) r0 01 � � b
l
la'-e r sS�
U
A�
(A �i u
��
3 �I 1 6 LA 5
� . 6b 3 5 °I `� I � k .1-7 2 35
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q WV - CA IT l 1 Yj AUd(�Q/ Phone: 6--1 6— Oil
1T
Reviewer/Inspector Date:
Page 3 of 3 1L12020