WI0400164_Application_20101028

State of North Carolina `
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Rem ediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treatA groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form. -t
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned. a
I.
H.
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ):
GENERAL INFORMATION:
i . Applicant's Naine (generally the responsible party): TA Operating Corp.
2. Signing Official's Name*: Peter Ward Title: Senior Vice President. Construction
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: 24601 Center Ridge Road
City: Westlake State: Ohio Zip: 44145
Telephone number: 440 808 9100 Fax number: 440 808 3307
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): IIPT TA Properties Trust _
5. Property Owner's mailing address: 24601 Center Ridge Road
City: Westlake State: Ohio Zip: 44145
f
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Kent Littlefield Title: _ Sr. Hy_drogeologist-Program Manager
Company: Benham Companies, LLC - SAIC
Address: 63110 Allentown Boulevard
City: Harrisburg State: PA "Lip: 17112
Telephone number: 717 9018843 Fax number: 717 901 8103
Email Address: kent.v.littlefieldgsaic.com
PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: X New ( Modification of existing permit ( Renewal of existing permit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. if this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, rill out sections I & 1I only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results ofall injection activities to date.
Revised 6109 UIC-5I/5T Page I of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERF TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A N L(S) FOR INJECTION
Type SI Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells —Tracer Injection
Ill. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: TravelCenters of America -Greensboro Travel Center
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 1101 NC Highway 61
City: Whitsett County: Guilford State: North Carolina Zip: 27377
8, INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: Diesel Fuel Dispensers, Soil impact discovered during diesel
fuel dispenser replacements.
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants maybe listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel ❑i1, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Diesel
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
X Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness 0.01 feet
(N❑ If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
( UST Section ( Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA sites)
( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ( Solid Waste Section
( Hazardous Waste Section X Other: _Guilford County Environmental Health Department
S. Incident managers name Mindy Lenard and phone number 336 6413771
6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
Incident #30318
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
I. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: None
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits:
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law:_ UST Certificate # 2010044780 Facility
ID # 0-029186
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T Page 2 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PE__-_1T TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells —Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. INJECTION FLUID DATA
1. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Anv substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section {GEES} of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list o 'cry ruved in evian or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES
Injectant: Regenesis, Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) (magnesium peroxide solid in fabric sock)
Concentration at point of injection: 15pounds in each of two wells
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Inj ectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Inj ectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
X None
( Municipal water supply
( Groundwater from private well or any well within '/4 mile of injection site
( Air
( Other:
3. If any well within '/{ mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source,
supply the following information: See Attached Table
a. LocationllD number of source:See Attachment A: Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
b. Depth of source: See Attached
c. Formation: See Attached
d. Rock/Sediment type: See Attached
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE: If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must apply for a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using applicut_ion.lbrin
G IVRS.
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T Page 3 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PE..,..IT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
Duration of Injection: 1 Event
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: 1
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 1 year
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event):
2. Injection rate per well: 0 gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: 0 gallons per day (gpd); 15pounds per event if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: 0 pounds/square inch (psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: Ambient Temp.._ °F
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: Semiannual groundwater
samNine will be conducted at wells CSAMW-1. CSAMW-2. CSAMW-3, CSAMW4 , and DDMW-
2. Water quality measurements will be recorded.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: 0.5 gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
Injection will be via:
X Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
{ Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Landprobe.LLC _
NC Well Contractor Certification number: 2858
3. Date to be constructed: 3/25/2009 Number of borings: 2
Approximate depth of each boring (feet): CSAMW-3, 25ft DDMW-2, 30ft
4. Screened interval/injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: 10 to 25 feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
Depth: 15 to 30 feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals. indicate shallowest and deepest depth),
5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: X PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:
Casing depth: 0 to 10 ft.
Casing depth: , 0 to 15 ft.
6. Grout (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: (X) Cement ( X) Sentonite ( Other:
Grout depth: 0 to 7.5 ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells -- In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type ST Wells — Tracer Injection
V. ATTACHMENTS
As required in Section V. of the Application to use Type 51 Wells for Injection, Additives, Tracers, the following
items are provided in Attachment A: Corrective Action Plan (CAP). Greensboro Travel Center, Incident Number
30318, by Benham Companies LLC, dated May 28, 2010. The CAP was prepared, signed, and sealed by a licensed
geologist by as required by G.S. 89E-13.
SITE HISTORY Page ES-1 and 2 and Pages 1-4 provide a brief description of the site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present.
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Pages 1, 9-12, Figures 3-5, Table 4, and Appendix A provide a hydrogeologic
description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the known or
projected depth of contamination including:
(1) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION Pages 16-17 and Page 19 describes the methodology of the proposed
placement of powdered magnesium peroxide in fabric socks called oxygen releasing compound (ORC).
Magnesium peroxide is a fine white to off-white powder that releases oxygen by breaking down at a
controlled rate in water. Magnesium peroxide is environmentally benign and widely used in the cosmetic,
QLncultural, pharmaceutical, and environmental industries. Magnesium peroxide is used in the
hioremediation of contaminated so) 11 and to reduce contaminant levels in groundwater. Attachment B contains
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for magnesium peroxide.
INJECTION RATIONALE Pages 13-17 discuss the rationale for selecting the injectants. Pagesl8-20 and Appendix
B specify the concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to
change (biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT There is no system construction proposed; therefore, no plans or
lists of materials are necessary. Pages 18-20 provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the
proposed injection including:
(1) operation procedures; and
(2) injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
MONITORING PLAN Page 19 provides a plan for monitoring the results and effectiveness of the injection,
including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
WELL DATA Tables 3 and 4 and Attachment C provide a tabulation of existing or abandoned wells within '/, mile of
the injection well. Attachment C details site monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells. Tables
include a description of each well's use and available information of depth, screened or open depth interval, and well
construction as available.
MAPS The figures 1-9 in the CAP include scaled site -specific maps:
(1) Location map }used on most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area (Figure 1 }.
(2) Site map including:
a. generalized property boundaries and buildings (Figure 2);
b. existing injection wells CSAAV-3 and DDMW-2 (Figures 2 and Figures 6-9);
c. a separate on -site diesel groundwater plume is present in the underground storage tankfield
backfill, and being remediated under Incident 20054; No other (offsite) existing sources of
potential or known groundwater contamination, waste storage, treatment, or disposal systems are
known within %4 mile of the injection wells.
d. surface water bodies within'/4 mile of the injection wells include two unnamed tributaries to
Little Alamance Creek to the south and east (Figure 2); and
e. existing wells within ''/a mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed injection zone
are shown (Figure 2) including monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
No abandoned wells are known to exist.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) (Figures 7 and 8) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) (Figure 9) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing monitoring wells and proposed injection wells
c. no additional monitoring or injection wells are proposed
(5) Cross -sections) are shown on Figures 4 and 5. These show the depths of:
a. major changes in lithology
b. existing monitoring wells and proposed injection wells
c. conceptual horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume is shown on Attachment D.
Attachment A: Corrective Action Plan (CAP), Greensboro Travel Center, Incident Number 30318;
Attachment B: Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for magnesium peroxide;
Attachment C: Tabulation of existing or abandoned wells within 'k/4 mile of the injection well; and
Attachment D: Conceptualized horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume in cross-section.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I15T Page 6 of 7

V
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
VI. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .0211(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and Title: L WIC �_ V
(,3 SYAVCV0A) C K
Signature: / Date: I &Y-0
VII. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
("Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner. in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200). John G. Murray
President
Printed Name and Title:
Signature - / Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
1 Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T
-� Pao 7of7

AT,
�67,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves perdue, Governor Division of Waste Management Dee Freeman, Secretary
tJSI" Section Dexter R. Matthews, Director
July 12, 2010
TravelCenters of America
Attu: Mr. James Schenker
24601 Center Ridge Road, Suite 200
Cleveland, OH 44145
Re: Notice of Regulatory Requirements
15A NCAC 2L .0407(b)
Risk -based Assessment and Corrective Action
For Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks
TravelCenters of Amcrica-B
1101 NC 61, Whitsett
Guilford County
Risk Classification: High
Flanking: 180D
Dear Mr. Schenker:
The Corrective Action Plan (CAP) received on June 3, 2010 has been reviewed by the UST
Section, Winston-Salem Regional Office. The plan and the schedule are hereby approved, with the
following modifications. groundwater samples are to be analyzed by EPA methods 602 and 625 annually
and by MADEP EP11 and VPH methods semiannually, If EPA methods 602 or 625 detect contaminants
above the 2L standards, that analysis method will be required during semiannual sampling.
Failure to implement the plan and schedule in the manner and time specified may result in the
assessment of civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms.
if coverage under the Leaking Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Funds (Funds) has
preNrio►esly gr nited or is anticipated, failure to implement the plan and schedule in the manner and
time specified in Vx CAP may result in potential loss of coverage. failure to practice cost effective
implevientatior_ .)f the plan, including soil and groundwater monitoring and operation and maintenance of
any rc—meoini systeri(s) until the date oa which cleanup goals are met, will also jeopardize reimbursement
of reasoual-Ic and :iecessary costs from the Funds.
Effective October 1, 2004, the Department requires that all work following the submittal of the
Limited Site Assessment Report (Title 15A NCAC 2L .0405) be preapproved if State Trust Fund
reimbursement is anticipated. To comply with this requirement, a completed Prcapproval/Claim
Authorization Form, encompassing the required remedial activities, must be received in this office within
14 days of the dale of this letter. Upon completion of the preapproved activities, you should submit your
claim promptly. Reimbursement funds are budgeted based on completed preapprovals, but lengthy delays
in reimbursement can occur if claims are not submitted immediately following work completion.
An Equal Qpportan ly I AtfirnvM Actor Employer • 54 % Rei*;1ed l 46 % PW Q)iv1_tu",,.r Paper

If you have any questions regarding trust fund eligibility or reimbursement from the Commercial
or Nonconomercial L.ealaing Petroleum (Underground Storage'rank Cleanup Funds, please contact the
UST Smtion Trust Fund Branch at [phone]. if you have any questions regarding the actions that
must be taken or the ruins mentioned in this letter, please contact Mindy L,epard at [phone] or the
address listed below for Guilford County Environmental Health_
Sincerely,
Cindye.Rirttoul, L.G.
Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
i.1ST Regional Offices
Asheriile (A RU) - 2440 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778 [phone]
F *vpttevil) e i FA VI - 225 Green Strcet, Suite 714, Systel Building, Fayetteville- 14C 28301 [phone]
Mooresville (SX-R) - • 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, 111C 28115 (704) 663-16" ,.
Raleigh (RRO) - 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 (919) 7914200
Washington (WA5) - 943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889 [phone]
Wilmington (HVQ.)- 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone]
Winston-Salem (W5) - 585 Woughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone]
Guilford Cnaoty Eeviroamental Health, 400 West Marker Street, Suite 300, Greensboro, NC 27401, [phone]
FTP7 CAP appn­.ai NOR0209,dol
An Equal Wpotinity 1 A#frrma4ve Action Employer . 50 %. Racyded l 10 % Post Consumbr Paper

eBSPJHAM
an SAIL company
D
December 13, 2010
c
mC
�
W
rn
-jk=
Mr. David Goodrich
Ca
_J�
Aquifer Protection Program
North Carolina DENR
a.
C]
2728 Capital Boulevard
DO
Raleigh, NC 27604
r,
RE: Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection
Greensboro Travel Center
1101 NC 61, Whitsett, Guilford County, NC
Incident Number 30813
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), Benham Companies, LLC submits two requested copies of
the Permit to Construct and/or Use a Well(s) for Injection (the Application) and Corrective Action Plan
(CAP) for remediating a diesel fuel release at the captioned property.
The geologic information requested in Section V of the Application is contained by the relevant passages
in the CAP as cited in the Application.
We trust submittals will meet your approval. Please respond to the undersigned with any questions or
your approval.
Respectfully,
BENHAM COMPANIES, LLC
Kent V. Littlefield, P. G.
cc: Ms. Emily F. Gloeckler, P.G., TravelCenters of America
6310 Allenlown BoulevardlHarrishurg, PA 171121Phone [phone]Fax [phone]www.saic.com

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERNIIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation l Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
■ Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.
Application Numher (Io be rurnplered by DWQ): _
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
C—) =�-c
r�-3
I . Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): TA Operating Corp.
2. Signing Official's Name': Peter Ward Title: Senior Vice President, Construction r"
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7. -�-r
3. Mailing address of applicant: 24601 Center Ridge Road
rV Ln
City: Westlake State: Ohio Lip: 44145'7' "'
Telephone number: 440 808 9100 Fax number: 440 808 3307
4, Property Owner's Name (ifdillicrent from Applicant): lIPT_TA Properties '1'
5. Property Owner's ma it ing address: 24601 Center Ridgf Road
City: Westlake State: Ohio Zip: 44145
b. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Kent Littlefield Title: Sr. Hydrogeoiogist-Program Manager
Company: Benham Companies, LLC - SAIC
Address: 6310 Allentown Boulevard
City:w Harrisburg State: PA Zip: 17112
-telephone number: 717 901 8843 Fax number: 717 901 8103
Email Address: kent.v.littlefieidC�7saic.com
It. PERMIT INFORMA"rION:
I. Project is: X New ( Modification of existing permit ( Renewal of existing pennit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & AI only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection 'activities to date.
Revised 6109 UIC-5115T Page 1 cif 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A W ELLtSy FOR MECTION
Type 51 Welts — in Situ Ground% ater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
M. INCIDENT & FACILITY' DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
I . Facility name: Tra elCenters of America -Greensboro Travel Center
2. Complete physical address of the facility: _I101 NC_Hi hway 61
City: whitsett County: Guilford State: North Carolina /;p: 27377
B. INCIDEN'f_DES!RI_PTION
I. Describe the source of the contamination: Diesel Fuel Dispensers; Soil impact discovered during diesel
fuel dispenser replacements. _
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel,_jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Diesel
3, Has LNAPL or DNA PI, ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)"
X Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness 0.01 feel
( No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site:
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
ppb
( UST Section ( Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA si(es}
( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ( Solid Waste Section
( Hazardous Waste Section X Other: Guilford County Environmental Hen lth Depsrimen1
5, Incident managers name Mindy Legurd and phone number 336 6413771
6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
Incident #30318
C. PFRMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
L Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: None
2. DWQ Nun -Discharge or NPDES permits:
3. County or DE subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or Federal law: _ LST Certificate # 20_1.0044780 Facility
I # 0-0j9186
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 2 of'7

APPLICATION FOR PER14IT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Retnediarion 1 Type 5T Wells —Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. [NJECTION FLUID DA TA
L List all proposed injectants.
.VOTE: .4ny ,suh.stance to be in)Ected as rx tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Oc•cupationa' and Environmental Epidemiology Section iOEESI of the Division nl'Public Health. Department of
Health ap,d !Human Services. Review the lirr rr r�titirr�vvLl r►rie�et�trrt.► ear contact [he [alC' Prrrgrum to rlctermirre if'
the injectants vou are proposing have been reviewed by GEES.
Injectant: Regenesis, Oxygen Releasing Cote and (ORC) (mx nesium pEroxide solid in fabric sock
Concentration at point of injection: 15 Aaunds in each of two wells _
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at F-ilint of injection:
Percent if in c mixture with other injectants;
Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
X None
( Municipal water supply
( Groundwater from private well or any well within '/. mile of injection site
( Air
( Other:
3. If any well within '/4 mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source,
supply the following information. See Attached Table
a. Location/ID number of source: See Attachment A: Correctise Action Plan C'AP
b. Depth of source: See Attached T
c. Formation: See Attached
d. RocklSediment type: See Attached
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
.VOTE If contaminated groundwater is to he used us the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must applyfor a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using (U)nlicutwq urm
(;11'R.Y.
Revised h,09 UIC•5115T Page 3 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Siru Groundwater Remediation I Type 5T Wells —Tracer Injection
Ei. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: _ I Event
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: I
b. Expected duration of each injection even[: I year
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event):
2. Injection rate per well. 0 gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: 0 gallons per day (gpd), 15 ounds per event (it separate events)
4. Injection pressure:_0. pounds/square inch (psi)
5. 1'emperature at point of injection: Ambient Temp. _ `F
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: _Semiannual groundwater
sampliag will be conducted at we_lsCSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, C'SA.%IW-4 , and Dl)NIW-
2s Water gualitY measurements will be recorded._
7. Estinldted hydraulic capacity of the well' 0.5 gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
x Existing wells) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
( Proposed well(s) to be constructed fir use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through 1.6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Landprobe, LLC
NC Well Contractor Certification number. 2858
3. Date to be constructed: 3/25/2004 Number of borings: 2
Approximate depth of each boring (feet): CSAMW-3 25ft DDMW-2 0 t
4. Screened intervalltnjection interval of injection wells:
Depth: _ 10 to 25 feet below ground surface (it'multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
Depth: to 30 feet below ground surface (if multiple in(ervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth].
5. Well casing (NIA if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: X PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:
Casing depth: _ Q to 10 ft.
Casing depth: 0 to 15 ft.
6. Grout (NIA if injection is through direct push nods):
Type: ( x) cement ( x) 8entonite ( Other.
Grout depth: 0 to 7.5 ft.
Revised 6-04 UIC-5115T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Rernediation /'Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
V. i TACHMF.NTS
As required in Section V. of the Application to use Type 51 Wells for Injection, Additives, Tracers, the following
items are provided in Attachment A: CorrEe.•rive .Anion Plan (CAP). Gree►tyburo Travel Cenrer, Incident ,Vumber
.10318, by Benham Companies LLC, dated May 28, 2010. The CAP was prepared, signed, and sealed by a licensed
geologist by as required by G.S. 89EE-13.
SITE HISTORY Page ES-1 and 2 and Pages ] A provide a brief description ofthe site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
IiYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Pages 1, 9-12, Figures 3-5. Table 4, and Appendix A provide a hydrogeologic
description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the known or
projected depth of contamination including:
(I) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used For injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION Pages 16-17 and Page 19 describes the methodology of the proposed
placement of powdered magnesium peroxide in fabric socks called oxygen releasing compound (ORC).
Magnesium peroxide is a fine white to off-white powder that releases oxMgn by breaking down at a
controlled rate in water. Magnesium peroxide is environmentally benign and widely used in the cosmetic,
.tat�uligrA, phinruceutic:tl, and environmental industries. Magnesium peroxide is used in the
bitiremediiation rf contaminated soil and to reduce contaminant levels in Upund" ater. Attachment B contains
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for magnesium peroxide.
INJECTION RATIONAL Pages 13-17 discuss the rationale for selecting the injectants. Pages 18-20 and Appendix
B specify the concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2.) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to
change (biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
INJECTION PROCEDURE AND E UIPMENT There is no system construction proposed; therefore, no plans or
lists of materials are necessary. Pages 1 S-20 provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the
proposed injection including:
(1) operation procedures; and
(2) injection schedule.
Revised t),09 UIC-5I/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMITTO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Situ Groundwater Rernediatioa 1 Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
MONITORING PLAN Page 19 provides a plan for monitoring the results and effectiveness of the injection.
including:
(1 ) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
WELL DATA Tables 3 and 4 and Attachment C provide a tabulation of existing or abandoned ►%ells within `/4 mile of
the injection well. Attachment C details site monitonng wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells. Tables
include a description of each well's use and available information of depth. screened or open depth interval, and well
construction as available.
MAPS Ilse figures [ 1-9] in the CAP include scaled. site -specific maps:
(1) Location map based on most recent USGS 7.5- topographic map of the area (Figure I )
(2) Site map including:
a.
generalized property boundaries and buildings (Figure 2);
L
existing injection wells CSAW-3 and DDMW-2 (Figures 2 and Figures 6-9);
c,
a separate on -site diesel groundwater plume is present in the underground storage tanklield
backfi11. and being remediated under Incident 20054; No other (offsite) existing sources of
potential or known groundwater contamination, waste storage, treatment, or disposal systems are
known within 'I, mile of the injection wells.
d.
surface water bodies within 'A mile of the injection wells include two unnamed tributaries to
Little Alamance Creek to the south and east (Figure 2), and
e.
existing wells within'/. mile of the injection we]l(s) which penetrate the proposed injection zone
are shown (Figure 2) including monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
No abandoned wells are known to exist.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) (Figures 7 and 3) including:
a.
direction of groundwater movement
b.
existing and proposed monitoring wells
c,
existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant
plume map(s) (Figure 9) including.
a.
the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b.
existing monitoring wells and proposed injection wells
c.
no additional monitoring or injection wells are proposed
(5) Cross -sections) are shown on Figures 4 and 5. These show the depths of:
a.
major changes in lithology
b.
existing monitoring wells and proposed injection wells
c.
conceptual horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume is shown on Attachment D.
Attachment A. Corrective Action Plan (CAP), Greensboro Travel Center, Incident Number 30318;
Attachment B. Matenal Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for magnesium peroxide;
Attachment C: Tabulation ❑fcxisting or abandoned wells within '/+ mile of the injection Weil; and
Attachment D: Conceptualircd horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume in cross-section.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 6 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT'f O CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — In Sirs Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer IoJection
VI. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NC'AC 15A X _021 1(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
l . for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3, for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a pnncipal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then wppl} a letter Signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
1 hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the intormation
submitted in this document and all attachments therein:, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of tines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and "Title: Lk P• 4(11 �V1
Signature:
Date: `11111(e)
VII. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
("Gxriier - uwans army person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being construc•ted..4 well is
real properry and its construction on land shall he deemed to vest vwnerchip in the land owner, in the absence Qf
contrary agreement in wrifing. )
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C ,0200).
John G. Murray
President
Printed Name and Title:
,y
Signature, - Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to., a
UIC Program ••
�.
Aquifer Protection Section Olt
to
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
�
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6109 UIC-51i5T Page 7 of 7

31
$
t
�
s
}
r
I.In.11wl (*@4)
1p
1,111111' 11111J1�,�1�1��111JIJ,��� �� i
Illlll,lj�1�1�111JI1'l 11 i l ,�-}-f-:fi,- i , -
1�����,,�,��1l1JIJ1l� +t
�IJ111J1J 11'I�J11,l,Jili 1JIl1JIJllr1'1�l '- : � • +
sIJ'11111'1111J,J1JIl1J11111 1 1' 11111 �{ ' + ;
r I IJ1J,1,1,+1 l 11J,I,1,I11111J1j1�,�,�1� ii i�� i
1111111111�Jllll'J1J J�II JJIJ �:+ � `•+
{ IJ111JIJ11'Iy I111111111111jIj 1111111J ,; i � +
illllllll JJl11Jl�Jj,,1,+,•+
l I l l I J l,l j�l 11 11111 �1�11I,� � 1,! ii
� 111111 I,111111'
+ 1�IJj111111'ljlll/'JIIIIIJ1J11j��1111111r �! � i ! +
,11JJ� �11111 Jllli:+••
� 111,11111J•11111 Jl
I IIIlJ1111 jrlllJ11111 J1Jllll'l'Jrlll'1'Jr�-i-`�i'a
i IIJIl1 J`J111111111111111 :+ � •+
Il1rI J111/11 Y ! 11111111/jljllllllllllll I ! •
+ 11111 jl','1111111,1,1,1111J1J1�1�1 j1�1� +
I;1 �1�I�111 J'111'J'Jti li 1� 1� 11 �1�1 �10/v
11'1'll�'1'�r�l'1'J'17 VI
�I111111,11J,J,J111
�111,,1�11J111111 I,;:
Il 11J11,J, ��'� 11 11 1 1',l,'r,JI Jll J
�Jllrl�llllllJ; � �lili�I J111 J1l'1�1 ';'j
l�llllJ111� � �1�1�1 1 ��111111 `II;�JIJ I1
�r111�J1 J111 J'i 1111 � 111 1
r1 , 1 1 1111; � � 1 111'l'1'l �l'l1 J1
111111IlIJIIIIJJJl1
'1'lJl'1'llllll J I l l l 1111
1111,,,,11-
+1111JII1J�l11i�i11JillllllJ'1'lll��'I�: �
aC
0
M
w
n
r
w
V
x

BErJHAM
an aA1C company
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
SITE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF REPORT: 5/28/ 10 -
FACILITY I.D.: 0-029185 ;
INCIDENT NO.: 30318
SITE NAME: TravelCenters of America -Greensboro Travel Center
LOCATION: 1101 NC Highway 51, Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
SITE PRIORITY RANK: Hieh (due to water supply well within 1.000 feet of the site)
LAND USE CATEGORY: Commercial
CURRENT UST OWNER, OPERATOR, AND OCCUPANT:
TA Operating CoM.
ADDRESS: 24601 Center Ridge Road, Westlake, Ohio 44145
PHONE: [phone]
PROPERTY OWNER: HPT TA Properties Trust
ADDRESS: 24601 Center Ridge Road, Westlake, Ohio 44145
PHONE: [phone]
CONS U LTANTIC ONT RACTOR :
Benham Companies, LLC
ADDRESS: 6310 Allentown Boulevard Harri sbuEg. PA 17112
PHONE: [phone]
RELEASE INFORMATION
DATE OF RELEASE:
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF RELEASE:
SOURCE OF RELEASE:
June 20 2006
330 03' 51" N
790 33' 50"W
Unknown
Diesel Fuel Dispensers (Soil impact
discovered durinE diesel fuel disnenser
replacements)
SIZE AND CONTENTS OF UST SYSTEMS
FROM WHICH THE RELEASE OCCURRED: Five 10 000- aflon diesel fuel USTs
I, Kent V. Littlefield, a licensed geologist for The Benham Companies. LLC, do certify the
information in this report is correct and accurate to the best knowledge.
t
0,4 �o�re&�r}etiy. I
* �41
9
(Signature & Seal)
P �
•
'.f aGC L13
i_II��°tie°ti
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company
6310 Allentown Boulevard Harrisburg, PA 17112 i tel: [phone] www.saic.com

Corrective Action Plan
TravelCenters of America
Greensboro Travel Center
11 0 1 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Incident No.: 30318
Facility I.D.: 0-429186
Priority Rank: HIGH
Benham Project 4501010051 1 1000
Prepared for:
TravelCenters of America
24601 Center Ridge Road
Westlake, OH 44145
May 2010
Respectfully submitted:
The Benham Companies, LLC
kent V. Littlefield, L.G. r
Project Manager
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIL company

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.............................................................................I...................... ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1
1.I
Purpose...............................................................................•---......................................
1
1.2
Location and Setting.....................................................................................................
1
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION............................................................. 2
2.1
Site Development..........................................................................................................
2
2.2
Storage Tanks................................................................................................................ 2
2.2.1 Underground Storage Tanks(USTs)..................................................................
2
2.2.2 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs).................................................................
2
2.2.3 Oil/Water Separators..........................................................................................
3
2.2.4 Former Tanks.....................................................................................................
3
2.3
Release History and Site Characterization....................................................................
3
2.4
Receptor Information.................................................................... ................
4
2.4.1 Water Supply Wells...........................................................................................
4
2.4.2 Public Water Supplies.................................................................. ............
4
2.4.3 Surface Water.....................................................................................................
4
2.4.4 Wellhead Protection Areas... ..............................................................................
5
2.4.5 Subsurface Structures.........................................................................................
5
2.4.6 Land Use and Property Owner and Occupants ..................................................
5
2.5
Previous Reports...........................................................................................................
5
2.6
Initial Abatement and Corrective Actions....................................................................
6
2.6.1 Soil Excavation..................................................................................................
6
2.6.2 Liquid -Phase Hydrocarbon (LPH) Gauging and Recovery ...............................
6
3.0 SUMMARY OF SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ...............................................
7
3.1
Dispenser Upgrade Soil Sampling................................................................................
7
3.2
Limited Site Assessment...............................................................................................
7
3.3
Comprehensive Site Assessment.........................................................................
3.3.1 Soil Borings........................................................................................................
7
3.3.2 Monitoring Wells...............................................................................................
8
3.4
Groundwater Modeling....................................................................................... .....
9
3.4.1 Fate and Transport Model... ...............................................................................
9
3.4.2 Input Data......................................................................................................... 10
3.4.3 Results and Discussion..................................................................................... 11
4.0 EVALUATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS............................................................13
4.1 Alternatives.................................................................................................................13
4.1.1 Bioremediation................................................................................................. 13
4.1.2 Soil Vacuum Extraction/Bioventing................................................................ 14
4.1.3 Soil Excavation and Removal.......................................................................... 14
4.2 Alternatives Cost Estimate......................................................................................... 15
4.3 Discussion of Remedial Options................................................................................. 16
The Benham Companies, LLC- an SAIL company

5.0 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION...........................................................................18
5.1 Basis of Recommendation................................................................... .. 18
5.2 Methodology............................................................................................................... 18
5.3 Remedial Effectiveness Monitoring........................................................................... 19
5.4 Remedial Schedule..................................................................................................... 20
5.5 Public Notification...................................................................................................... 20
6.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................21
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1, Site Location Map.....................................................................................Following
Text
Figure 2, Site Plan.....................................................................................................Following
Text
Figure 3, Site Geology Map......................................................................................Following
Text
Figure 4, East—West Geologic Cross Section...........................................................Following
Text
Figure 5, North —South Geologic Cross Section........................................................Following
Text
Figure 6, CSA Soil Sampling Results - March 2009................................................
Following Text
Figure 7, Groundwater Contour Map - April 28, 2009.............................................
Following Text
Figure 8, Groundwater Contour Map - May 28, 2009..............................................Following
Text
Figure 9, Groundwater Sample Results....................................................................Following
Text
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1, UST/AST Owner/Operator and Other Responsible Party Information ...... Following Text
Table 2, Site -wide UST/AST and Other Release Information ................................. Following Text
Table 3, Public and Private Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information... Following Text
Table 4, Adjacent Property Owners/Occupants........................................................Following Text
Table 5, Groundwater Elevations and Product Thickness........................................Following Text
Table 6A, Groundwater Sampling Results - BTEX and PAHs ................................Following Text
Table 613 Groundwater Sampling Results - MADEP VPH and EPH.......................Following Text
Table 6C, Groundwater Sampling Results - Field Parameters .................................Following Text
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A, Groundwater Modeling Documentation and Results ..........................Following Text
Appendix B, CAP Calculations................................................................................ Following Text
The Benham Companies. LLC - an 5AIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA' rtslGreensboro Incident 3031 S-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 - ES 1 - May 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), The Benham Companies, LLC (Benham) prepared
this Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for TA's Greensboro facility located at 1101 North Carolina
Highway bl in Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina (the facility). A CAP was required by
a Notice of Regulatory Requirements (NRR) letter from the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) dated March 1, 2010. This CAP reviews site
history; summarizes subsurface investigation findings; sets objectives for corrective action;
evaluates alternatives for meeting those objectives; and recommends enhancement of the existing
bioremediation process and maintenance of the facility paving to prevent direct human contact
and limit dissolution into groundwater.
The subject of this CAP is the facility diesel fuel dispensing pad, where impacted soil was
discovered during TA's diesel dispenser and piping upgrades in April 2006. TA removed
102.5 tans of hydrocarbon -impacted soil, and DENR assigned Incident No. 30318 for the
release. As no active leakage was present, the source of the release was likely from fuel
dispensing operations. TA followed up with a Limited Site Assessment (LSA) of the diesel
dispenser pad using four sail borings and one monitoring well (DDMW-2). The February 2007
LSA reported no soil impact; however, groundwater was impacted by hydrocarbons at DDMW-
02. The LSA report documented residential supply wells within 1,500 feet, which designated the
facility a high risk classification.
TA further investigated the diesel dispenser pad with a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA)
using 19 sail borings and 4 monitoring wells. Of the 40 soil samples collected by the CSA, only
4 locations exceeded the Soil to Groundwater Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentration
(MSCC) limits. The CSA report and addenda, dated .Tune 29, 2009, October 2, 2009, and
January 29, 2010, detected benzene and C9-C22 aromatics above 2L Standards at DDMW-2 and
2-methyl naphthalene and C9-C22 above 2L Standards at CSAMW-3. Benzo(b)fluoranthene was
measured above solubility limits at various wells (CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, and CSAMW-4)
but was believed to be adsorbed to colloidal particles and not representative of
dissolved concentrations. Liquid -phase hydrocarbon (LPH) was measured in DDMW-2 on
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPI16331TA\ rts\Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 - ES 2 • May 2010
March 31, 2009, amounting to 1.3 fluid ounces, all of which was recovered. No LPH recurred in
April or May 2009, or during purging in September and December 2009. The CSA also
confirmed the active presence of contanunant-degrading bacteria in soil and groundwater. The
impervious surface covering (pavement) at the site prevents direct exposure to the impacted soil
and hydrocarbon dissolution by water infiltration.
Site hydraulic gradient and hydraulic conductivity contribute to very slow (0.025 feet per day)
groundwater migration as expected for the saprolitic soils. Target hydrocarbons attenuate to
below 2L Standards less than 30 feet from the source. The property line is 220 feet from the
source, so there is no risk to water supply wells. Favorable conditions for microbial populations
with capability to degrade hydrocarbons were confirmed. These characteristics combine to make
bioremediation a feasible corrective action, as indicated by the lack of hydrocarbon impact in
downgradient wells MW-15, CSAMW-1, and CSAMW-2. However, the single instance of LPH
suggested a hydrocarbon film on the inner well surfaces of DDMW-2.
This CAP used the data collected by the LSA and CSA to propose corrective action by enhanced
bioremediation. It recommends a single application of dilute (5 percent) hydrogen peroxide in
DDMW-2 to address the residual hydrocarbon film on the inner well surfaces; installation of
Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) within DDMW-2 and CSAMW-3 to stimulate the existing
bioremediation; monitoring remedial effectiveness by semiannual groundwater sampling; and
maintaining facility pavement to prevent direct contact with soil and limit dissolution into
groundwater. Cleanup goals for the CAP are DENR's current 2L Standards. Upon attainment of
this goal, the site is eligible for incident closure.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPI16331TAV lslGreensborc Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center • Incident 30318 - 1 - May 2010
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), The Benham Companies, LLC ( Benham) submits
this Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the Greensboro, North Carolina facility. This CAP
responds to the April 2006 discovery of impacted soil at the diesel fuel dispensing pad, which
was assigned Incident No. 30318 by North Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR). This CAP summarizes subsurface investigation findings; sets corrective
action objectives; evaluates remedial alternatives; and recommends a remedial option.
1.2 Location and Setting
The facility is situated on a 27.93-acre parcel at 1101 North Carolina Highway 61 in Whitsett,
Guilford County, North Carolina (Figure 1). It is bordered by Greeson Road to the north, Pace
Drive and Interstate 85 to the south, Route 6I to the west, and undeveloped land and an unnamed
tributary to Alamance Creek to the east (Figure 2). The facility features automotive and truck
fueling; a restaurant and motel; convenience store; and truck maintenance shop. The facility is
served by public water and sewer.
The facility lies in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Central Piedmont Physiographic Province of
North Carolina at a surface elevation of approximately 640 feet above mean sea level (AMSL).
Figure 3 provides the site geology, and Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the subsurface profile based on
soil borings around the diesel dispenser pad. The surface is predominated by impervious cover
and landscaped areas, and it slopes south toward Alamance Creek approximately 4,600 feet
distant. The diesel dispenser pad is located at a topographic high on the property.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an 5AIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA xtslGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident ,j0318 -2- May 2010
2.4 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
2.1 Site Development
The site was undeveloped until the 1987 construction of a truck fueling facility by Pace Oil
Company. It was purchased by BP ail Company and then sold to TA in 1993 (Table 1). The
1987 underground storage tank (UST) system currently remains in service-
2.2 Storage Tanks
2.2.1 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)
Table 2 and Figure 2 provide the relevant storage tank information. Located on the southwestern
corner of the facility, the UST field consists of eight single -walled 10,000-gallon
fiberglass -coated steel USTs. Five USTs contain diesel fuel, and three contain unleaded
gasoline. The diesel UST system is associated with the diesel fuel dispenser pad in the
northwestern portion of the facility. The gasoline USTs serve the automobile fueling area in the
south-central portion of the facility. The USTs are protected with impressed current and overfill
protection. UST leak detection is by an automatic tank gauging (ATG) system. All pressurized
product pipelines from the USTs to the dispensers are double -walled, fiberglass -reinforced
plastic (FRP).
2.2.2 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)
The facility has two aboveground storage tanks {ASTs} located southeast of the service station
and restaurant (Figure 2). These are for new motor oil and used motor oil. The ASTs were
installed in 1987 and are inside a concrete basin capable of holding 4,800 gallons of fluid. These
tanks are not associated with any releases at the facility.
The Benham Companies. LLC --- an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA11 1slGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 - 3 • May 2010
2.2.3 Oil[Water Separators
A below -grade oil/water separator (OWS) is adjacent to the ASTs (Figure 2). Surface water
runoff from the diesel fuel dispensing pad flows through the OWS.
2.2.4 Former Tanks
The Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) report for Incident No. 6113 (June 1999) states that
the facility formerly contained one 550-gallon fuel oil, one 550-gallon used fuel oil, and one
3,000-gallon diesel fuel USTs, which were removed in 1990.
2.3 Release History and Site Characterization
There were four historic releases and incident numbers at the facility. BP is responsible for a
1990 gasoline release near the gasoline dispensers (Incident No. 6113) (Figure 2). Eagle
Transport Corporation (Eagle) was responsible for a diesel release at the UST field in 2007. TA
is responsible for a 1999 diesel release at the USTs (Incident No. 20054).
TA is also responsible for the April 2006 hydrocarbon -impacted soil discovered during a diesel
dispenser and piping upgrade at the diesel dispenser pad (Incident No. 30318), which is the
subject of this CAP. No active leakage was present which indicated the source was dispensing
spills. The quantity of diesel fuel released is unknown. TA removed 102.5 tons of impacted soil
from the shallow subsurface and conducted a Limited Site Assessment (LSA) of the diesel
dispenser pad with four soil borings and one monitoring well (DDMW-2). The February 2007
LSA report documents residential water wells within 1,500 feet (Table 3), which designated the
facility a high risk classification, although these wells are outside of the groundwater pathway
from the facility. The LSA did not detect any soil impact; however, groundwater had
hydrocarbon impact at DDMW-02.
In 2009, TA further investigated the diesel dispenser pad with a CSA of 19 soil borings and
4 monitoring wells. Of the 40 soil samples collected by the CSA, only 4 were above the
The Benham Companies. UC - an SAiC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA rtslGreensboro Incident 30318-GAP
Greensboro Travel Center - incident 30318 - 4 . May 2010
Soil -to -Groundwater Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentration (MSCC) limits (Figure 6).
Soils were characterized as a clay -rich residuum of weathered bedrock (saprolite) extending from
approximately 1 foot below grade (fbg) to bedrock at 7 to 20 fbg. The bedrock is
metamorphosed quartz diorite. Depth to groundwater was measured from 0 to 19.05 fbg.
Groundwater hydrologic gradient is toward the south (Figures 7 and 8). Groundwater samples
detected benzene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and C9-C22 aromatics above 2L Standards (Figure 9),
while benzo(b)fluoranthene was not believed representative of dissolved concentrations.
Hydraulic gradient and hydraulic conductivity contributed to a very slow (0.025 feet per day)
groundwater velocity.
2.4 Receptor Information
2.4.1 Water Supply Wells
Public water is supplied to the facility and surrounding residential and commercial properties by
the City of Gibsonville. Telephone discussions with the City of Gibsonville, review of previous
reports for the facility, and a reconnaissance of the surrounding areas determined that 8 private
water wells exist within 1,500 feet of the release (Table 3). However, these wells are located
outside of the groundwater pathway from the facility and at an elevation equivalent to or higher
than the facility (Figure 1).
2.4.2 Public Water Supplies
No public water supply wells or reservoirs are located within 2,500 feet of the release.
2.4.3 Surface Water
The nearest surface water body to the facility is an intermittent tributary to Alamance Creek on
the southwest property margin. This stream flows southeast through a culvert under North
Carolina Highway 61 (Figure 1) and emerges on the south side of Pace Drive, where it enters
The Benham Companies, LLC — an 5AIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TAV rtslGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - f ncident 3031 B . 5 - May 2010
another culvert under 1-85. South of 1-85, it combines with another unnamed stream and flows
into Alamance Creek/Lake Macintosh about 4,600 feet south.
2.4.4 Wellhead Protection Areas
No wellhead protection areas are known to exist within the area of this release.
2.4.5 Subsurface Structures
A survey of utilities located along Route 61 and Pace Drive and at the facility was conducted.
Underground utilities, storm drains, and electrical conduits were located by visual inspection,
site maps, and the One Call System. These were screened with a photoionization detector (PID)
capable of detecting organic vapors. The buildings at the facility were not screened as they do
not have basements. No elevated PID measurements were present during the screening, and no
evidence of impact was present in surface or storm water structures.
2.4.6 Land Use and Property Owner and Occupants
The facility is zoned and used as a commercial property. It is surrounded by residential,
agricultural, and commercial/industrial zoned properties. The adjacent property to the east is
undeveloped and is zoned as commercial. North, south, and west of the facility are residential
properties. A list of property owners adjacent to the facility is included as Table 4.
2.5 Previous Reports
The following report listing records the actions to date for Incident No_ 30318:
Report Title Date Source/Authors
Soil Sampling Services (Dispenser Closure Report)
Limited Site Assessment Report
Comprehensive Site Assessment Work Plan
Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Comprehensive Site Assessment Report Addendum I
Comprehensive Site Assessment Report Addendum 2
June 22, 2006
February 19, 2007
March 10, 2008
.tune 29, 2009
October 2, 2009
January 29, 2010
Sierra Piedmont
Sierra Piedmont
SAIC
SAIC
SAIC
Benham
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA1 rtslGreensbcro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 - 6 - May 2010
2.6 Initial Abatement and Corrective Actions
2.6.1 Sail Excavation
Initial abatement began upon the discovery of the release during the diesel dispenser
replacements in 2006. Approximately 102.5 tons of diesel fuel -impacted soil was removed from
the diesel dispenser pad. The excavation and post -excavation soil sampling are described in the
June 22, 2006, Soil Sampling Services Report and February 11, 2007, LSA.
2.6.2 Liquid -Phase Hydrocarbon (LPH) Gauging and Recovery
No liquid -phase hydrocarbon (LPH) was reported in soil during dispenser replacements. The
February It, 2007, LSA reported no LPH observed on groundwater (monitoring well DDMW-2)
or in soil borings of October 2006. Other than a single instance of LPH measured in and
recovered from DDMW-2 in March 2009 (Table 5), no LPH was present. No LPH recurred in
DDMW-2 during gauging in April and May 2009 or purging in September and December 2009.
The Benham Companies, LLC — are SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA MslGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center . Inciauri(,Ml8 .7 - May 2010
3.0 SUMMARY OF SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
3.1 Dispenser Upgrade Soil Sampling
In April -May 2006, TA replaced the diesel dispensers at the site as described in the
June 22, 2006, Soil Sampling Services Report. Soil samples were collected from 24 locations,
and 102.5 tons of impacted soil were removed from the diesel dispenser pad. Soil sampling
conducted after hydrocarbon -impacted soil removal indicated soil concentrations above MSCC
limits.
3.2 Limited Site Assessment
In October 2006, TA installed four soil borings (DB-01, D13-02, ❑B-03, and D13-04) and one
monitoring well (DDMW-2) for the LSA. The borings penetrated silty clay and clayey silt to
bedrock (6 to 15 fbg), and the soil samples did not detect evidence of impact. A groundwater
sample of DDMW-2 contained volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and extractable petroleum
hydrocarbons (EPH) above the 2L and Gross Contamination Levels (GCL) Standards (Table 6).
The LSA reported that private supply wells were present within 1,500 feet of the site. As a
result, a CSA investigation was required by the DENR to delineate the extent of soil and
groundwater impact.
3.3 Comprehensive Site Assessment
3.3.1 Soil Borings
In March 2009, TA conducted a CSA by installing 19 soil borings and 4 monitoring wells
surrounding the diesel fueling dispenser pad. A total of 40 soil samples were collected using
direct -push methods. No LPH or groundwater was observed in the borings, and refusal (bedrock)
varied from 6.5 to 12 fbg. Sail samples were collected and analyzed for benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Five soil samples
were analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons/extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA1 rts\Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - h6cle;u jo318 - 8 . May 2010
(VPHJEPH) according to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP)
method. Three soil samples were analyzed for grain size, permeability, bulk density, and
fractional organic carbon. Additionally, three soil samples were collected and analyzed for total
heterotrophs, contaminant -degrading organisms, nitrates, and phosphates.
Of the 40 soil samples collected by the CSA, only 4 were above the Soil -to -Groundwater
MSCCs, as summarized on Figure 6. The geotechnical analyses of the saprolite reported hydraulic
conductivity ranging from 6.277E-05 feet per day (ftlday) (2.39E-08 centimeters per second [cmis])
to 3.37E-03 ftlday (1.19E-06 cm/s). The fine texture and low hydraulic conductivity of the saprolite
inhibits hydrocarbon infiltration. Bacteria colonies with enzymatic capabilities to degrade
hydrocarbons were measured. The relatively neutral sail pH and number of colonies indicated a
healthy and diverse contaminant -degrading bacteria population is present in soil.
3.3.2 Monitoring Wells
Four monitoring wells were installed around the diesel dispenser islands (CSAMW-1,
CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, and CSAMW-4) for the CSA. Weathered bedrock was encountered
between 6.5 and 12 fbg, with no indication of groundwater above bedrock. Groundwater was
encountered in bedrock at 15 to 20 fbg at CSAMW-3 and CSAMW-1, respectively,
Equilibration of groundwater levels took approximately one week. No groundwater was
encountered at CSAMW-2 and CSA.MWA so these wells were drilled to approximately 75 fbg
where the boreholes remained dry. Equilibration of groundwater levels in these wells took
approximately one month. Groundwater levels were monitored monthly from March to
May 2009 and again in September and December 2009. Groundwater gradient slopes south
(Figures 7 and 8) generally following the surface topography.
Groundwater sampling of the wells surrounding the diesel fuel dispensers (MW-4, CSAMW-1,
CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, CSAMW-4, and MW-15) was conducted in March, April, September,
and December 2009. DDMW-2 contained LPH in March 2009, which was recovered, but the
well was not sampled. Thereafter, LPH did not accumulate in DDMW-2, even after purging to
sample in September and December 2009. Groundwater samples were analyzed for BTEX,
The Benharn Companies. f_LC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA1 Is6reensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident su318 - 9 - May 2010
PAHs, VPHIEPH, total heterotrophs, benzene -degrading organisms, methyl tertiary -butyl ether
(MTBE)-degrading organisms, nitrates, and phosphates. The CSA and addenda, dated
June 29, 2009, October 2, 2009, and January 29, 2010, reported benzene and C9-C22 aromatics
above 2L Standards at DDMW-2 and 2-methyl naphthalene and C9-C22 above 2L Standards at
CSAMW-3. Benzo(b)fluoranthene was measured above solubility limits at various wells
(CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, and CSAMW-4) but was believed to be adsorbed to colloidal particles
and not representative of dissolved concentrations.
Slug testing of DDMW-2, CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, CSAMW4, and MW-15
measured a low mean hydraulic conductivity of 0.03I fit/day (0.232 gallons per day per square
foot [gpd/ft2]). This results in a low groundwater velocity of 0.025 ft/day, or 3.3 ft/year.
Petroleum hydrocarbons migrate at an even slower rate in groundwater, which indicates little
migration from the diesel dispensers, as confirmed by attainment of 2L Standards at the
downgradient wells MW-15, CSAMW-I, and CSAMW-2. On this basis, there is no potential for
hydrocarbon migration to receptors.
Bacteria with enzymatic capabilities to biodegrade hydrocarbons were measured in groundwater.
The relatively neutral groundwater pH and moderate dissolved oxygen levels are conducive to a
healthy and diverse microbial population in groundwater. Soil and groundwater sampling
indicate bioremediation is occurring. Slow groundwater migration and bacterial viability
indicate a potential for bioremediation of the hydrocarbons and lowering the risk classification.
The default remedial goals for soil and groundwater are the lower of the soil -to -groundwater or
residential MSCCs or the 2L Standards. Upon attainment of this goal, the site is eligible for
incident closure.
3.4 Groundwater Modeling
3.4,1 Fate and Transport Model
Groundwater fate and transport modeling was conducted to assess the potential future extent of
regulated substances in groundwater. Specifically, the modeling was used to predict the extent
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WRI6331TA1 1$s Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - tncideni au318 -14 - May 2010
of regulated substances in groundwater up to 10 years in the future. The modeling was
completed using Quick Domenico (QD), a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet application of An
Analytical Model for Multidimensional Transport of a Decaying Contaminant Species, by
P.A. Domenico (Journal of Hydrology, 91 [ 19871, pp 49-58). This model is a peer -reviewed
three-dimensional solute transport model for predicting concentrations in the groundwater in the
future. It was used to calculate the concentration of target hydrocarbons downgradient of the
source and determine where groundwater will be above the 2L Standards ( Appendix A).
3.4.2 Input Data
The source of groundwater impact is releases of diesel fuel from fueling at the diesel dispenser
pad. The downgradient property boundary is located at a distance of approximately 220 feet to
the southwest of the diesel dispenser pad. Target hydrocarbon substances exceeding
2L Standards in groundwater at the site in 2009 included benzene, benzo(b)fluoranthene,
2-methylnaphthalene, and C9-C22 aromatics detected in groundwater by monitoring
wells CSAMW-3 and DDMW-2. other hydrocarbons were detected above 2L Standards in
2006; however, these were not modeled because they no longer exceed 2L Standards.
To be protective, the model was run at maximum concentrations detected by the CSA with the
assumption of no reduction of source concentration with time. Additionally, the retardation
effects of fractional organic carbon (FDC) were set as insignificant (0.05 percent) relative to the
higher measured FQC concentration (2.56 percent). The model required both site- and
compound -specific input from the investigation or as recommended in the model documentation:
• Ax (longitudinal dispersivity): Recommended by model documentation as 0.1 *distance
from the source to the location of concern (property line): 0.1*220 feet = 22 feet.
• AY (transverse dispersivity): Recommended by model documentation as Ax13 = 22 feet/3 =
7.33 feet.
• Az (vertical dispersivit: Recommended by model documentation as Ax120 = 22 feet120 =
1.1 feet.
The Benham Companies. LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP115331TA' )rtsiGreenshoro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident j0318 - 11 - May 2010
* Source Width (maximum width of the area of contaminated soils): This value was set at
40 feet based on the characterization groundwater chemistry data and assuming a source
between DDMW-2 and CSAMW-3.
* Source Thickness (the thickness_ of contaminated soils plus the groundwater smear Zane):
This value was set at 10 feet based on the fluctuation of groundwater.
■ Hydraulic Conductivity: Based on the slug testing, the geometric mean of hydraulic
conductivity value at the site is 0.031 feet/day.
■ Hydraulic Gradient: An average gradient measurement of 0.073 fVft was set using the
historic groundwater elevation measurements.
■ Porosity: Using an estimate of effective porosity for the silt and clay beneath the site, a value
of 10% was set.
* Soil Bulk Density: A value of 1.33 was utilized for the soils.
■ Fractional Organic Carbon: A value of 0.05% was used to be conservative. The measured
value for the site soils was 2.56%.
The following shows the input data utilized for benzene as an example. Other targets were
modeled with their specific input 1 fisted on the model output page:
■ Source Concentration: The maximum benzene concentration detected over the past
sampling events was 0.0015 milligrams per liter (mg1L) and was used in the modeled
source area.
* Receptor Concentration: The 0.001 mg/L benzene 2L Standard was used.
* Lambda (first order decay constant): The published benzene attenuation lambda is
0.000959 days t.
* KQHC (organic carbon partition coefficient): The value listed in the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance for benzene is 98.
3.4.3 Results and Discussion
The results of the modeling are summarized on the QD model spreadsheets included in
Appendix A. Model predictions were calculated for 10 years to assess the potential
The Benham Companies, L L C -an SA IC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA' wis\Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident j0316 -12 - May 201 D
configuration and extent of the contaminant plume. Of the four target hydrocarbons, benzene is
the most mobile and has the lowest 2L Standard. The modeling indicates that benzene will not
migrate more than approximately 20 feet before dropping below the 2L Standard. As the
distance to the downgradient property line is 220 feet, benzene will not migrate off the property
at a detectable concentration in groundwater. This is due primarily to the fact that benzene is
present at a relatively low concentration (1.5 micrograms per liter [pg/L]) and the rate of
groundwater migration is exceedingly slow. Although higher in concentration, the C9-C22
aromatics will not migrate beyond 12 feet distance before dropping in concentration below
2L Standards, which indicates low mobility. Even less mobile, 2-methylnaphthlene attenuates
and drops below 2L Standards in a distance of approximately eight feet. Benzo(b)fluoranthene is
not representative of a dissolved -phase impact but is immobile, migrating less than one foot.
The absence of dissolved hydrocarbons in groundwater samples from the three downgradient
wells (MW-15, CSAMW-1, and CSAMW-2) south of the diesel -dispensing canopy supports the
modeling results. Lack of migration owes mainly to low source concentrations, low hydraulic
conductivities, and low hydrocarbon mobility, which translate to no potential risk to receptors.
A Iack of mobility discourages pump and treat for the CAP but supports in -place treatment of
hydrocarbons using bioremediation.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TX rctslGreensborc Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - lncld D318 -13 . May 2010
4.0 EVALUATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
4.1 Alternatives
The default remedial goals for soil and groundwater are the lower of the soil -to -groundwater or
residential MSCCs, as required in the March 1, 2010, Notice of Regulatory Requirements (NRR)
letter to TA. Upon attainment of this goal, the site is eligible for incident closure. A variety of
corrective action alternatives exists to address the hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater to
meet these goals. Potentially viable alternatives were evaluated with respect to factors such as
ability to meet remedial goals, expected influence of site -specific characteristics, timeliness, and
cost. The following is a discussion of the potential alternatives that could be applied to mitigate
the hydrocarbons for Incident No. 30318.
4,13 Bioremediation
Bioremediation relies on microorganisms (bacteria) to metabolize and degrade hydrocarbon
contaminants into harmless products, primarily carbon dioxide and water. Once the
contaminants are degraded, the bacteria population will decline. The effectiveness of
bioremediation for attaining the remedial goals is dependent upon site -specific factors of nutrient
availability, size and type of microbial populations, oxygen availability, pH, and temperature of
the substrate.
Recent analyses have shown that hydrocarbon -degrading bacteria are present in both the soil and
groundwater and the pH and nutrient availability are favorable. Depressed dissolved oxygen
concentrations in CSAMW-1, CSAMW-3, and DDMW-2 groundwater, relative to other wells with
little or no dissolved hydrocarbons, show bioremediation is ongoing. Oxygen consumption is due to
the fact that hydrocarbon -degrading bacteria are aerobic. The impervious surface paving prevents
direct human contact with contaminated soil but also precludes infiltration of oxygen -rich meteoric
water.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SA1C company

Corrective Action Plan WPIl6331TA1i rts\Greensboro Incident 36318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 14 - May 2416
4.1.2 Soil Vacuum Extraction/Bioventing
Soil vacuum extraction (SVE) physically removes hydrocarbon vapors from soil by creating
airflow through the soil with a vacuum pump piped to a well network. SVE is most applicable to
sites with volatile hydrocarbons, such as gasoline, and porous permeable soil. The subject site
does not meet these criteria.
A modification of SVE for less volatile hydrocarbons is bioventing, which inoves lower rates of
air through the soil. Bioventing provides oxygen to assist aerobic bacteria in hydrocarbon
remediation. Hydrocarbon vapors that are released are treated using granular -activated carbon
(GAQ, and the treated air is subsequently discharged. Bioventing below the groundwater (air
sparging) can be accomplished by pumping air into the subsurface below the groundwater.
Groundwater in the vicinity of the diesel dispensing pad is in bedrock; therefore, relatively
shallow treatment by SVE/bioventing will not influence groundwater without the air sparging
component of bioventing.
4.1.3 Soil Excavation and Removal
Upon discovery of impacted soil at the dispenser pad, 102.5 tons of impacted soil were removed
from the subsurface under the pad. Subsequent soil samples indicated the remaining soil impact
was limited to shallow depths because of low soil permeability. Water infiltration and direct
contact with soil are precluded by paving over the area.
The remedial goals for soil might be attained by additional excavation and soil removal, but
groundwater will not be treated by soil excavation. Excavation/removal would necessitate the
existing product piping be removed, which would put the facility out of service for one month or
more. Pre -excavation or soil stockpile samples may be necessary, depending on the
disposal/treatment facility chosen. Based on the spacing of soil borings and an assumption of a
5- to 10-foot excavation depth where. MSCCs are attained, 600 to 800 cubic yards of soil may be
generated. At approximately 1.8 tons per cubic yard, approximately 1,080 to 1,440 torts may be
produced by excavation. Soil sampling prior to backfilling is recommended to document the
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPI16331TA} rts\Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident :i0318 15 May 2010
removal of the impacted soil. An equal quantity of soil backfill will replace the impacted soils
removed from the subsurface.
Excavated contaminated soils are removed from the site to a permitted landfill or treatment
facility. Landfilling of impacted soil reduces landfill capacity unless it can be used for daily
cover. Treatment involves thermal desorption, asphalt blending, or bioremediation. Positive
considerations for landfilling and recycling include a relatively short time to complete the
operation and no on -site storage necessity. Disadvantages include additional transportation and
treatment expenses. As with all ex -situ methods, this alternative requires replacement of the
removed soils and backfilling with proper compaction.
4.2 Alternatives Cost Estimate
Benham developed cost estimates for evaluating remediation alternatives by
bioremediationlnatural attenuation, bioventing, and soil excavation and removal. The cost
estimates were based on the following assumptions:
1. Currently, the facility pavement and natural soil properties prevent direct human contact
with hydrocarbons and inhibit water infiltration and migration of impacted groundwater.
Bioremediation preserves that isolation status with no additional cost.
2. Bioventing alone does not treat groundwater; therefore, air sparging below the groundwater
would be necessary. All piping for bioventing and air sparging must be underground.
3. The volume and weight of the impacted soil to be excavated and treated (or disposed) are
cost drivers that can be estimated, but the loss of business due to removal of the product
piping are primary costs that are difficult to estimate.
4. For excavation/removal, the dispenser pad would have to be shut down and piping removed,
Excavation would involve removal/replacement of the product piping and electric utilities
disturbed by soil removal and post -remedial soil samples. Backfill would need to be
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP116331TA rts\G re e n sboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Inciaeni j0318 -16 - May 2010
purchased and installed. Pavement and concrete will need to be replaced with the capacity
to support weight.
Based on Benham's experience in remediation, and the assumptions stated above, the estimated
costs to address the three soil altematives are:
• Option 1: Bioremediation: $20K - $30K.
• option 2: SVElbioventing: $95K - $125K (not recommended).
• Option 3: UST removal and installation and off -site soil treatment by recycling:
$320K - $370K (not recommended due to additional potential exposure and
costs).
4.3 Discussion of Remedial Options
Based on site factors and the relative decrease in hydrocarbon concentrations since 2006,
bioremediation has been and is presently occurring. In the most recent sampling, groundwater
already meets the 2L and GCL Standards except for C9-C22 aromatics in DDMW-2. The CSA
data indicate hydrocarbon degraders are present and conditions are conducive for bioremediation
to meet the remedial goal. Groundwater data from the CSA demonstrate that no hydrocarbon
impact is migrating from the diesel dispenser pad on the site.
The relatively depressed concentrations of dissolved oxygen will slow the process of
bioremediation. Therefore, to speed the process of bioremediation oxygen releasing compound
(CRC), a magnesium peroxide additive, can be applied in wells. CRC increases dissolved
oxygen concentrations in soil and groundwater promoting aerobic metabolism of the
hydrocarbon residuals. Bioremediation enhanced with CRC is the lowest cost alternative and is
recommended.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPIl6331TA11 -tskGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - incident ju318 - 17 - May 2010
Remediation of soil Gould be enhanced by bioventing using this alternate means of adding oxygen.
However, the low volatilization potential and the presence of impacted groundwater in bedrock
suggest that the technique would also require air sparging. Based on the additional costs and
limitations of treatment area by the low permeability soil and bedrock, bioventing is not
recommended at this time.
Soil excavation is unnecessary because current conditions isolate the soil and groundwater from
direct contact and infiltrating water. Soil excavation would expose soil for direct contact and
water infiltration and would result in significant costs beyond those for other alternatives. The
product piping system and other underground utilities would need to be shut down, removed, and
reinstalled, creating the potential for an accidental release. Site data demonstrate no potential for
migration to receptors, so this level of effort and cost is unreasonable. Finally, excavation would
not remediate groundwater because groundwater is in bedrock. As soil removal is not justified
and has a host of significant disadvantages, it is not recommended.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPI1M331TA11 ls\Greensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident 30318 -18 - May 2010
5.0 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION
5.1 Basis of Recommendation
Compared to the historical groundwater sampling results of 2006, the September and
December 2009 groundwater sample results indicate a significant reduction in hydrocarbon
concentrations. The relatively reduced dissolved oxygen concentration in groundwater further
supports that natural processes are degrading the hydrocarbons. As a result of degradation and
low hydraulic conductivity, groundwater downgradient of the diesel dispenser pad meets the
2L and GCL standards. Groundwater and hydrocarbon migration rates are slow, and
surrounding receptors are hundreds of feet away and topographically higher. As a result, no
hydrocarbon -impacted groundwater has migrated from the dispenser area, and the potential of
impact to receptors is low.
5.2 Methodology
Based on the conditions measured, which support an active community of hydrocarbon
degrading organisms and lack of impact downgradient, enhanced bioremediation will be used to
address the remaining hydrocarbon impact from the 2006 diesel fuel release. This methodology
has been well established and accepted by the state and federal agencies and the regulated
community.
Prior to implementing enhanced bioremediation, a single dose of dilute (5 percent) hydrogen
peroxide in water will be applied to DDMW-2. This amendment will serve to oxidize the
residual hydrocarbon film expected to reside as a coating of the inner well casing and screen
walls and to increase the dissolved oxygen. The dissolved phase in the well and residuals on the
well casing are conservatively estimated at a sum of approximately 4.2 grams (Appendix B).
The hydrogen peroxide required to complete the reaction with hydrocarbons is a ratio of 2.17:1;
therefore, using that ratio, a total of 9.1 grams is required. To be conservative, a safety factor of
three times the required reaction amount or 27.3 grams hydrogen peroxide will allow for
treatment of the filter pack and formation skin just outside the well screen. A liter of retail 5
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WN6331TA1 VGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident JU318 - 19 - May 2010
percent hydrogen peroxide contains 71.5 grams; therefore, 4.4 liter of 5 percent hydrogen
peroxide will be introduced to DDMW-2 for this purpose.
The current population of hydrocarbon -degrading bacteria will be enhanced by increasing the
dissolved oxygen concentrations in groundwater south of the diesel dispenser pad using ORC
socks placed in DDMW-2 and CSAMW-3. A total of 15 feet of 2-inch ORC socks
(5.5 kilograms) will be installed in the groundwater in each well. The reaction of the magnesium
peroxide in the socks and water in the well will produce approximately one kilogram of oxygen
over approximately one year. The oxygen will diffuse into the groundwater surrounding the well
and be available to enhance the bacterial decomposition of the hydrocarbons. If necessary, based
on continued presence of hydrocarbons above the 2L Standards, the socks will be replaced in
kind at the end of one year.
5.3 Remedial Effectiveness Monitoring
Semiannual groundwater sampling will be conducted at wells CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2,
CSAMW-3, CSAMW-4, and DDMW-2 to document remedial effectiveness. if LPH is present,
it will be removed from the well and a modification in the remedial method may be considered.
No groundwater sample will be acquired from a well with LPH. Monitoring wells will be
purged and sampled in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Method D-4448. During purging, water quality data will be recorded with field instruments
including pH, temperature, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen, salinity, and
specific conductance. All purge water will be discharged to the facility OWS.
Groundwater samples will be collected from each well with dedicated disposable bailers, placed
in laboratory -provided glassware, and preserved according to ASTM Method D-3694. Samples
will be submitted for analysis of C9—C22 aromatics by MADEP VPHIEPH. Following the
groundwater sampling and receipt of laboratory reports from each semiannual sampling event, a
brief remedial effectiveness monitoring report will be prepared, which will compare the results
of the groundwater monitoring to the 2L Standards. Upon attainment of the 2L Standards, a no
further action (NFA) approval will be sought.
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Corrective Action Plan WPM MTA11 rtslGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident JU318 - 20 - May 2010
5.4 Remedial Schedule
Upon approval of the CAP by the DENR, the remedial schedule will include initial hydrogen
peroxide and ORC introduction in the first month. A semiannual schedule of remedial
evaluation monitoring and reporting will then commence, with sampling six months after ORC
introduction. Laboratory analyses from the semiannual sampling will be done on a normal
turnaround, which is approximately two weeks. Reports of the results of sampling will be
submitted within one month of the receipt of laboratory reports.
5.5 Public Notification
As the CAP proposes corrective action by enhanced bioremediation and does not propose
remediation to an alternate cleanup standard, no public notification is required under 15A NCAC
2L .[14Q9(a).
The Benham Companies, LLC — an 5AIC company

Corrective Action Plan WP1l63MMI 1slGreensboro Incident 30318-CAP
Greensboro Travel Center - Incident ju318 - 21 May 2010
6.0 REFERENCES
CRA Services/Engineering, Inc., Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum, Incident No. 6113,
June 1999.
North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Guidelines far Assessment
and Corrective Action for UST Releases, July 1, 2001, and July 15, 2008.
Rintoul, Cindy, North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Notice of
Regulatory Requirements Letter, March 1, 2010.
Sierra Piedmont, Limited Site Assessment Report, Incident No. 30318, February 19, 2007,
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL), Comprehensive Site Assessment,
Incident No. 30318, June 2009.
SAIC, Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum, Incident No. 30318, September 2009.
The Benham Companies, LLC - subsidiary of SAIC, Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum,
Incident No. 30318, January 2010.
The Benham Companies, CLC - an SAIC company

FIGURES
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAiC company

-�.ILCIO
--
At
1 }�
j ,� Greesan Road
UST System e
�-85 O � may{'}► + ��
ffr2ryy •� 'may`-� ; ! k �
�'��e+state 85
Nate. The base map is from the USGS Gihsanvilte 7.5 min. Quadrangle.
Legend
0 250 500 1,000
- Surface Water
Feet
Property Boundary TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA
Onsite Buildings GREENSBORO FACILITY
N i 101 NC 111GHWAY 61, WHITSETT, NC
- Site Location Map
' drawn r:h-cR Z- xpptv.ed
xa� �l JGYL_ iigurc no.
x 5 ldaw x /a Aau �Q
rile nri
xx-xxu•xct-xxsn•ux
date recision
8� ErJMM
K:IGIS_Data1TAlWhitsett. NCTrajects=813 - CAPTigI-Topomap.mxd

5 ,�6
WASS
�1i1►-f
rRucu soy,Es
Raw
4AIMCIN01
zn
DDM► g is
z1 4
-12Q
-1419 0 a ` cNAW-2
_1-1 tRt"
A, GWAGE
GAT mv-16
jo.mv- 1 v VEW-1
UL�FN3F v WCE MTRW
" ® AND REvAUR,Wr
,/WA1ER SEPAUTOR
DUMPSTER
ti m -1 SHM
.00 4 mw
W
Rip s
r-85
LEGEND
BMW-1
(MONITORING WELL
+VP-1
SOIL VAPOR IMPLANT
+DP-1
DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION WELL
S U$TMW--1
UST FIELD (MONITORING WELL
UST
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
AST
ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK
-------OE--
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
—+ �7
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LIFE
11
STORM SEWER LINE
-55
SANITARY SEWER LINE
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER UNE
T.
TRENCH DRAIN LINE
0MH
MANHOLE
DROP INLET
150' 0 150'
SCALE IN FEET

�lp
�r
r' e+
Nole: The base map is from the USGS Gibsonvilie 7.5 min. Quadrangle.
Legend
Cross Section Axes
PzZg - Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite
Property Boundary N
Onsite Buildings
- - Surface Water
1-1
■
"Aa
i
J , •ter
!�
0 250 500 1.000
Feet
TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA
GREENSBORO FACILITY
1101 NC HIGHWAY 61. WH1TSETT, NC
Site Geology Map
KSL -PIP-,•
5110110 dart de[c
rtie n7
■
3
K:IGIS_ IMTA%Whitsett, NclProjeds130813 - CAPTig3-Geo1ogy.mxd

0
IOU
so
MW-4
CSASS-7
CSASB•S CSAMW-3
DOMW-2
CSASS-5 CSASB-3
zxm_ CSASB-4 CSAMW-1
C- ter..--... -.
F � � ..• -"_� r ..r . r � � r....r ..ter r � .. -r rY � .=��
f lorixontal Scale i " = 40'.
Groundwater He►'alion (ft) hasM on •112812004 data.
Howell nog available for• NIW-4.
We►'atiaus based upon an arhit1-M-. da(aul.
-<
)i X X - Asphalt & Gravel
�� - 13rtirack
- • Sapronite (Satiny Clay &Clay)
Geologic Cross-section North to South at dispenser pad. FIGURE 4

Elevation (feet)
I
0
i4
0
O
n-
a
Illllll�
m
n
�111
n x
s
1
1,11
iJ}
6 nr
11111111111111111111, � j�,� I� I I II l�
y111�1111111111
1111�111�1j1�111111�����1�lj�jll
�,�,11111111111111111111 � 11
� n � d ;111111111111111111111��� 11111
11111111111111111111111111�1�1�11,1,1,1,111�1�1�1�1�1�111111111,1,11
q ',I,I jllll 11111111 1111 �
11111111111111111111 _TL-111111111111
,� •� 11111111111,1,1,llllllllllllllllllllll11111
=r1111111111111111111111111j1j1111111111111 111111
WX
11111111111111111 l l jl jljlillli l �lllllllll�llllllljl j111i1111111111111111111111�
� Illlll,,llllll 111111111111
CL
11 l 11 1 1 Illllllllllllll,�,�,�,�,lll�lll�l�l�l�llllllll�llll, l � I 1� i i i�
CD1 1i1 CD
X A�1�I�llll
CD x
x
tz+�+''' X
b 3
C r �
ul a 3
n
R
7
S
v�
D
a
to
6
A
0
W

GRASS
CSA-SB8 1-2'
Compound
Result
B =
0,910
x =
5.54
LEGEND
S MW-5
MONITORING WELL
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SCSAMW-1
MONITORING WELL
,CSA—SB1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING
isMW-4
STORM SEWER LINE
TRUCK SCALES
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
p [3
CSA-SB8 & l .11 p an
IACSA-S810
° CSA-S811
CSA-SB7 1 v
1 v ■CSA-SB12
CSA-SB13
CSAMW--3 �� ° CSAMW-4
CSA-S814
CSA-SB5
DDMW-2 O ! °
CSA-S815
CSA-SB4 t a
° CSA-sets
l
CSA-583 ■ v
CSA-SO17
� -0n
-4' CSA-S82
CSA-S816
CSA—SB2 3
Compound
Result
C4 -C22 Ar
61. 43
*MW-15
CSA-581 yfCSA-5818
�GSAMW-2
sCSAW Y
TRUCK DIESEL FUELING DISPENSERS AND CANOPY
SA—SB17 273
Compound
Result
8 =
0.047J
N =
7.3
2—Mn
17
-CIB N =
11,040
-22 k =
2,220
CSA--SB18 1-2
Com ound
Result
2—Mn =
12
CSA—SB18 5-5
Compound
Result
N =
1.2
2—Mn =
4.6
� t
L
TRUCK
GARAGE
WELL ID DEPTH
Cam ound
B =
Benzene
x =
x enes
N =
Na htholene
2-Mn
2-Meth no hthcIene
-CIS k =
C9-C18 Ali hotics
-C22 Ar -
Cg-C22 Aromatics
ALL RESULTS MEASURED IN MILLIGRAMS PER
KILOGRAMS (mg/kg)
ONLY RESULTS EXCEEDING THE MSCCS ARE
SHOWN
40' 0 40,
MENI
SCALE IN FEET

Qum
1n
a
CSA-588
CSA—ss7 ■
CSAMW-s
a5.cy r
CSA—Sm
DDM1P-2 19'.i
93.45
1
93 cSA--Sa4 A
CSA—SB3 A
91
CSA—SB1
BMW-15 �7
�g "89.1
TRUCK SCALES
CSA—S89
,CSA—SB10
-�— TRUCK DIESEL FUELING oisPCrlss=Rs AND CwaaPr
CSA—SB1T
LCSA—SB12
CSA—SU13
ISCSAMW-4
1�5.93
. CSA-5814
- yo,■CSA—SBi9
r
— jC-SlMW-2
5 3.7i
LEGEND
epMW-5
MONITORING WELL
— CSAMW-1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
S
MONITORING WELL
■CSA—SB1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING (MARCH 2O09)
STORM SEWER LINE
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN FEET
_ f
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
IN FEET
ELEVATION NOT USED IN CONTOURING
40' 0 40'
SCALE IN FEET

& MW-4
92, 7,}
CSA--SB9
° �CSA-SB1O
SA -See
&CSA-sBt t
CSA-5B7
00
TRUCK SCALES
TRUCK DIESEL FUELING o1SPENSERS AND CANOPY
° ■CSA-SB12
CSA-SB13
CSAMW-4
CSA-S88
CSAM9P-3 S&
95.21
CSA-S814
-SB5
CSA-5815
89.7.1
CSA-SB16
CSA-SB4 , .
4
'
CS S
CSA-se17
an e
r
GSA—SB1B
CSA—S82 �'I
fl
CSA-SB49
csA-sat ,.
° _
r
9173 -2
19CSAMr�-1
994 .53
+
95
s
NNW-15
ca co
(m
:.y..
co
c
}
1
i
L
TRUCK
GARAGE
LEGEND
s MW-5
MONITORING WELL
CS,M jib— J
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
S
MONITORING WELL
■CSA-SB1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING (MARCH 2O09)
STORM SEWER LINE
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN FEET
—95--
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
IN FEET (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
INTERPRETED GROUNDWATER FLOW
DIRECTfON
40' 0 40
SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND
S M1W--5
MONITORING WELL
CSAMW-1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
S
MONITORING WELL
,CSA-SB1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING
BMW-4
STORM SEWER LINE
TRUCK SCALES
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
f e �ACSA—SB10
u� 1
CSA-S68 A. � °11 goM 1°
CSA--SB1 1
CSA—S97 : l °t I
CSAMW- 3
ACSA-SB 12
Cam ound Result
2-Mn = 70
csA-sB13
-M k = 1,820
CSA--SBs
CSAMW-4
1-M k= 1,300
CSAMW-3 S °
CSR-5814
CSA—S85
CSA—SB15
mn °
DDMW—S S l4 °
NS =
CSA—SB1fi
CSA—SB4 , I °
CSA_Sa, ���A-S817
CSA-Ss2 :'l °Il L�°CSA-58,8
GSA-SE31 `
CSAMW-1-1
CSAMW-1
SMW-15 CompoundCompoundl Result
NID Bhf = 1 2
CSA-SB19
TRUCK DIESEL ET]EUNG DISPENSERS AND CANOPY
M
ICSAMW-2
Com ound
ICSAMW-2
Com ound
Result
B b f =
2
TRUCK
GwGE
WELL ID
om ound
8 b f =
Benao b fluoranthene
2-Mn
2-Meth naphthalene
-12 Arm
C9-C22 Aromatics
1-0 k=
C11-C22 Aromatics
NO NON -DETECT OR BELOW THE
2L STANDARDS
Ivy NOT SAMPLED; LIQUID PHASE
HYDROCARBON (LPH) PRESENT AT
TIME OF SAMPLING
ALL RESULTS MEASURED IN MICROGRAMS PER
LITER (pg/L)
NOTES:
1. ONLY RESULTS EXCEEDING THE 2L STANDARDS ARE
SHOWN.
2. DUPLICATE GROUNDWATER SAMPLE OF CSAMW--1
INDICATES NO DETECTION OF BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
40' 0 40'
SCALE IN FEET

TABLES
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

TABLE 1
USTlAST Owner/Operator and other Reponsib le Part►• Information
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility I.D.. 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30813
UST ID Number
1 through 8
Facility ID Number 0-029186
AST ID Number
19 and 10
Name of Owner
Dates of Operation
I iPT TA Properties Trust
December 15, 1993 to Present
Address ITelephone
24601 Center Ride Road, Westlake, OH 44145 440-808-4431
Name of ❑ erator
Dates of Operation
TA Operating Corporation
IDecernber 15, I993 to Present
Address
Telephone
24601 Center Ride Road, Westlake, OH 44145
440-808-4431
Incident Numbers
30813
20054
Name of Responsible Part
Dates of Releases
TA Operating Corporation
Incident 30813-April 2006 ❑iesel Fuel Release
Incident 20054 in 1999 (Diesel Fuel Release
Address
ITelephone
24601 Center Ridge Road, Westlake, OH 44145
440-908-4431
UST 1D Number
1 throu h 8
Facility ID Number
0-029186
T
AST ID Number
9 and 10 -
Name of Owner
Dates of Operation
BP Oil Company
l 9S. 7-1093
Address
Tole hone
28100 Torch Parkway, Warrenville, IL 60555
630-836-5000
Name of O erstor
jDates of Operation
BP Oil Com an
1987-1993
Address
Telephone
28100 'Porch Parkway, Warrenville, IL 60555
630-836-5000
Incident Number
61 13
Name of Responsible Part
Dates of Releases
BP Oil Company
Incident 6113-1999 (Gasoline Release)
Address
ITelephone
28100 Torch Parkway, Warrenville, IL 60555
630-836-5000

TABLE 2
Site -wide USTIAST Information and Other Release Information
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility 1.D.. 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30813
UST ]ID
Current -Last
Previous
Construction
Description of
Date Tank
Current
Leak
Corrosion
Spill Prevention/ Overfill
Was Incident No. 30813 Release
Contents
Contents
Capacity
Capacity
Tank Dimensions
Associated Piping;
UST location
Installed
Status
Detection
Protection
Protection
Associated With UST System.
and Pumps
Single -walled,
UST Field -
1
Diesel
Not
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
Southwest side
1987
In -Service
ATG system
Cathodic Protectian-
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
Yes
Applicable
Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
of Site
Impressed Current
Single -walled,
UST Field -
2
Diesel
Not
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
Southwest side
1987
In -Service
ATG system
Cathodic Protection-
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
Yes
Applicable
Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
of Site
Impressed Current
Not
Single -walled,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
UST Field -
Cathodic Protection-
3
Diesel
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
Southwest side
1987
In -Service
ATG system
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
Yes
Applicable
Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
of Site
Impressed Current
Single -walled,
UST Field -
4
Diesel
Nat
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
Southwest side
1987
In -Service
ATG system
Cathodic Protection-
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
Applicable
Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
of Site
Impressed Current
Not
Single -walled,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
UST Field -
Cathodic Protection-
s
Diesel
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
diameter
double -walled FRP
Southwest side
I987
In -Service
ATG system
Impressed Current
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
Yes
Steel
of Site
Unleaded
Not
Single -walled,
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
UST Field -
Cathodic Protection-
6
Gasoline
Applicable
10,000 gal
Fiberglass -coated,
diameter
double -walled FRP
Southwest side
1987
In Service
ATG system
Impressed Current
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
No
Steel
of Site
Unleaded
Not
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
UST Field -
Cathodic Protection-
?
Gasoline
Applicable
10,000 gal
Single -walled Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
Southwest side
1987
In Service
ATG system
Impressed Current
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
No
of Site
Unleaded
Not
96 inches in
3 inch diameter
UST Field-
Cathodic Protection-
8
Gasoline
Applicable
14,000 gal
Single -walled, Steel
diameter
double -walled FRP
Southwest side
1987
In Service
ATG system
Impressed Current
Spill bucket, flow restrictor
No
of Site
AST ]m
Current -Last
Previous
Capacity
Construction
Tank
Tank Dimensions
Description of
kssoriated Piping
UST Location
Date Tank
Current
Secondary Containment
Was Incident No. 30813 Release
Contents
Contents
Details
Status
Associated With UST System?
and Pumps
AST #9
Bulk Oil
Not
8,000 1
�
Painted Steel
Unknown
None
Southeast of Service Station &
1987
In Service
Bath ASTs are surrounded by one concrete dike
No
Applicable
Restaurant
(dimensions 20 ft by 33 ft by 3 ft) with 4,800
gallon capacity
AST #10
Used Motor
Not
4,000 gal
Painted Steel
Unknown
None
UST Field -Southwest side of
1987
In Service
No
OiI
A licable
Site
Incident
Material
Date of
[kscription of Release
Number
Released
Release
6113
Gasoline
1990
BP is responsible for the 1990 gasoline release.
In May 1999, diesel fuel seeped into a surface water body. The release was reported to DENR and assigned Release # 20054, but the quantity of diesel fuel released was unknown. An October 1999 investigation conducted by ARCADIS Geraghty & Mil ter
(Arcadis) confirmed soil and groundwater impact, including liquid -phase hydrocarbons (LPH) within 35 feet of the Facility USTs. The investigation recognized the source as broken seals in the UST drop tubes and identified a preferred pathway for discharge of
diesel to a storm sewer near the USTs. That pathway was a 4-inch drain pipe, which was subsequenity closed. As a result of the release 13,212 gallons of liquid -phase hydrocarbon (LPH) were recovered and 300 tons o f contamin ated soils were removed. A
20054
Diesel Fuel
1999
CAP was previously proposed by Sierra Piedmont Engineers and Geologists and approved by DENR in September 2003. It consisted of quarterly Aggressive Fluid and Vapor Recovery (AFVR) for one year with two AFVR events the following year.
Groundwater samples were to be collected one week after each AFVR event. Between March 2003 and November 2004, three AFVR events removed a total of 3,194 gallons of water and 133 gallons of LPH. In November 2004, DENR reclassified the release to
a lower risk and TA suspended remediation, but in September 2007 DENR raised the risk level and required TA to implement the approved September 2003 CAP.
The April 2006 release was manifested as soil impact by diesel fuel under the diesel dispenser pad discovered during a dispenser replacement project. The quantity of diesel fuel released was unknown. The vicinity of the diesel dispenser pad was investigated by
30813
Diesel Fuel
April 2006
a LSA dated February 2007. The LSA did not detect a soil impact at the locations of the soil borings; however, well DDMW-02 con firmed a groundwater impact west of the dispenser pad. The site risk is high due to wells within 1,500 feet of the Site and as a
result a CSA is being prepared.
None
Diesel Fuel
2047
Eagle Transport Corporation was responsible for the 2007 release, which was caused by overfills of the diesel Fuel USTs. Approximately 6.79 tons of soil, one AFVR event on MW-12, a quarterly monitoring and groundwater sampling of MW-12 was conducted.
Assi ed
This release was not assigned an incident number, and was issued a Notice of No Further Action by DENR in September 2008.
NOTES:
1) UST -Underground Storage Tank 2) FRP-Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic 3) ATG-Automatic Tank Gauging

TABLE 3
Public and Private Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility 1.D.: 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30813
13'cll l D/Propert}
Phone
Well Casing Depth
Well Screen
Distance and Direction from
Well Owner & User
Well Location Address
Wcll Use
Well Depth (ft hgs)
Type of Well
Up or Dongradient
Parcel tiuirtber
Number
ft h s
Interval ft b s
source area of release ft
02-02-0080-0-008 1 -00-
Clapps Chapel AME Church
1301 Piney Grove Road,
336-273-5757
drinking
;
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
530 to the southwest
Duwitgracii011t
018
Owner and User
Whitsett, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
George, Timmy & Amy-
7207 Greeson Road,
336-449-5796
drinking, irrigation
18-1
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
620 to the north
Upgradient
048
Owner and User
Whitsen, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
Mr. James David & Frances
1010 Highway 61 N.,
336-449-5124
drinking
400
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
910 to the northwest
Upgradient
022
P. Workman-OwnerfUser
Whitsett, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
Mr. Ronald Lee Key-
1017 Highway 61 N.,
drinking & household
336-449-754D
>Iaa
Unknown
Unknown
l:nlcno.,� ii
650 to the north
Upgradient
042
Owner/User
Whitsett, NC 27377
use
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
Mr. Donald R. and Bernice
1015 Highway 61 S.,
drinking, irrigation,
336-445-03I9
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
830 to the north
Upgradient
043
Emmons-OwnerfUser
Whitsett, NC 27377
livestock
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
Ms. Etta L. Ingle-
10I9 NC Highway 61 S.,
336-446-0263
drinking
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
410 to northwest
Upgradient
050
Owner/User
Whitsett, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-0081-00-
Mr. Charles Baxter Smith-
1205 NC Highway 61 S.,
Unknown
drinking
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
1,000 feet to the south
Downgradient
014
Owner/User
Whitsett, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-008 1 -00-
Mr. David Ingle-
1008 NC Highway 61,
Unknown
nknnwn
Not Used
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
960 to the northwest
Upgradient
Owner/User
Whitesett, NC 27377
Other Receptors
Receptor I❑
Description
Location
Contact
Phone Number
Usage
Distance and Direction from
Up or Downgradient
o
source area of release ft
Diesel Fuel Pipelines
Fueling i lines from UST field to dispensers
West Side of diesel fueling canopy (Figure 2)
Jim Schenker (TA)
404-808-7368
Diesel fueling
At source area
Downgradient
USTs
UST field
Southeastern corner of property
Jim Schenker TA
404-808-7368
Diesel fueling
150 feet southwest
Downgradient
OilfWater Seperator
Drains lead into seperator prior to discharge
Southwestern side of Service Station
Jim Schenker (TA)
404-808-7368
Oil[Water
300 feet southeast
Upgradient
Se ration
Water SuRply Line
Gibsonville Water Supply Lines
Along Greeson Road (Figure 2)
City of Gibsonville
339-449-4144
Water Sum&
200 feet north
UpEadicnt
Drain Lines
Drains and piplines from diesel fuel dilLensing area
Onsite-throughout (Figure 2
Jim Schenker TA
404-808-7368
Drains
At source area
Down & Crossgradient
Storm Sewer
Storm drains along Route 61 and in landscaped area at Site
Southwestem border of Site
Unknown
Unknown
Roadway Drains
170 feet south
Downgradient
Retention Pond
Pond for collection of storm water runoff
Southeastern border of Site
Jim Schenker (TA)
404-808-7368
Collection of
1000 feet southeast
Upgradient
runoff
Un-named tributa
Un-named, intermittent tributary to Alamance Creek
Eastern border of Site
Unknown
Unknown I
Stream
1000 feet east
Upgradient
NOTES:
1) ft bgs-feet below grade surface
2) Sources: February 2007 Limited Site Assessment Report for Incident #30813 and August 13, 2003 Corrective Action Report for Incident #20054.
H:1JobslTA 0peratinglGreensboro, NClirtcident 303181CAPITable 3-Water Supply Well Information 4-12-10.xIs 5/21/2010 12:38 PM

TABLE 4
Adjacent Property Owners/Occupants
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility I.O.: 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30613
Map ID
Tax Parcel
Qwner/Occupont Name
Property Address
Contact/Mailing Address
Current Property Use
NumbertMep ID
(Last, First MI)
02-02-0080-d
1019 NC Highway 61,
PO Box 24. Whitsett, NC
1
0081 00 050
Ingle, Etta L.
Whitsett, NC 27377
27377
Residential
2
02-02-0080-0-
Ingle, G. D.
7205 Greeson Road,
PO Box 142. Whitsett, NC
Residential
0081-00-067
Whitsett, NC 27377
27377
3
02-02-0080-0-
George, Timmy &Amy
7207 Greeson Road,
7201 Greeson Road,
Residential
0081-00-048
Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett, NC 27377
4
02-02-0080-0-
Davis, Kibble T. & Karen
7211 Greeson Road,
7211 Greeson Road,
Residential
0081-00-020
G.
Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett. NC 27377
5
02-02.0080-0-
Pierre, Earlene S.
7217 Greeson Road,
6903 Stone Bridge Court,
Residential
0081 00 04❑
Whitsett, NC 27377
Alexandria, VA 22406
6
02-02-0080-0-
Rehm, Deryn B. & Angela
7223 Greeson Road,
7223 Greeson Road,
Residential
0081-00-038
C.
Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett, NC 27377
7
02-02-0080-0-
Monoghan, Ernest G., Jr. &
Ernest
7225 Greeson Road,
7225 Greeson Road,
Residential
0081-00-035
Noppanit
Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett, NC 27377
8
02.02-0080-0-
Norton, Steven F. & Diane
7227 Greeson Road,
7227 Greeson Road,
Residential
0081-00-032
L.
Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett, NC 27377
9
02-02-0080-0-
Crafton, Morris L. & Pace
7230-7232 Greeson Road,
150 Stratford Court,
VacanVUndeveioped (Wooded
0081-00-051
Distributing Co., Inc.
Whitsett, NC 27377
Winston Salem, NC 27103
and fields)
10
02-02-0080-A-
Jarrell, Barbara H. 8 T.R.
1638-R12 Wheeler Bridge
3694 Davis Cup Dr.,
Vacant/Undeveloped
0081-00-011
Humphrey
Road, Whitsett, NC 27377
Greensboro, NC 27406
(Wooded)
02-02-0080-A-
Jarrell, Barbara H. & T.R.
1638-R13 Wheeler Bridge
3694 Davis Cup Dr.,
Vacant/Undeveloped
11
0081-00-012
Humphrey
Road. Whitsett, NC 27377
Greensboro, NC 27406
(Wooded)
02-02-0080-0-
1201-1203 NC Highway 61
PO Box 341. Burlington,
Vacant/Undeveloped
12
0081-00 062
Cara LP
S, Whitsett, NC 27377
NC 27216
(Wooded)
13
02-05-0303-0-
Gipple, Mary S.
1025 Penn-LO ❑r,
1500 Hobbs Road,
Vacant/Undeveloped❑112-00-005
Whitsett, NC 27377
Greensboro, NC 27410
14
02-D2-0080-0-
Clapps Chapel AME
1122.1124 NC Highway 61
1301 Piney Grove Read,
VacantlUndeveloped (Fields)
0061-00-018
Church
S, Whitsett, NC 27377
Whilsett, NC 27377
02-02-0080-0-
Haley, Kimberly W. & C.G.
1100-1120 NC Highway 61
7210 Whitsett Paris Road,
Residential and
15
0081-00-021
Wheeler
S. Whitsett, NC 27377
Whitsett, NC 27377
VacanVUndeveloped (Wooded
and Fields)

TABLE 5
Groundwater Elevation and Product Thickness
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility I.U.: 0-O29186 Incident Number.: 30813
Well11)
Date
Screened Interval (top of
screen to bottom of
screen in feet
Depth to Water-
Uncorrected [feet]
Free Product
'Thickness (feet)
Depth to Water-
Corrected
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)
Groundwater
Surface Elevation
feet
3/18/2008
5.15
7.52
7-52
100.00
92.48
4/1/2009
01
0+
100-00
>100.00
MW-4
4/28/2009
5.03
5.03
100.00
94.97
5/28/2009
7.21
7.21
100.00
92.79
911/2009
10.93
10.93
10(.00
89.07
12/22/2009
0+
10.93
100.00
>100.00
3/2712009
4-14
2.84
2,84
92.24
89.40
4/28/2009
3.05
3.05
92.24
89.19
MW-15
5/28/2009
3.53
3.53
92.24
88.71
9/112009
5.37
--
5.37
92.24
86.87
12/22/2009
1.83
-
1.83
92-24
90.41
3/24/2009
16-31
24.80
-
24.80
94.18
69.38
361/2009
7-72
--
7.72
94.18
86.46
4/1/2009
7.69
--
7.69
94.18
86.49
CSAMW-1
4/28/2009
8.50
--
8.50
94.18
85.68
5/28/2009
9.01
--
9.01
94.18
85.17
9/1/2009
9.82
--
9.82
94A8
84.36
12/22/2009
6.87
6.87
94AS
87.31
3/31/2009
60-70
18.05
18.05
97.75
79.70
4/28/2009
44.15
44.15
97.75
53.60
CSAMW-2
5/28/2009
3.22
3.22
97.75
94.53
9/1/2009
19.06
19.06
97.75
78.69
12/2212009
15.70
15.70
97.75
82.05
3/31/2009
10-25
5.48
5.48
98.39
9191
4/1/2009
2.79
2.79
98.39
95.60
CSAMW-3
4/28/2009
3.30
3.30
98.39
95.09
5/28/2009
3.18
3.18
98.39
95.21
9/1/2009
9.88
9.88
98.39
88.51
12/22/2009
3.05
3.05
98.39
95.34
3/31/2009
65.75
53.10
53.10
99.09
45.99
4/28/2009
3.56
3.56
99.09
95.53
CSAMW4
5/28/2009
3.31
3.31
99.09
95.78
9/1/2009
13.37
13.37
99.09
85.72
12/27/2009
9.97
9.97
99.09
89.12
10/3/2006
15.28-29.65
16.94
1&94
101.22
84.28
3/31/2009
4.29
=
4.33
97.78
93.45
DDMW-2
4/28/2009
5.54
5.54
97.78
92.24
5/28/2009
8.05
8.05
97.78
89.73
9/1/2009
10.43
10.43
97.78
87.35
12/22/2009
4.28
4.28
97.78
93.50
NOTES:
1) ft bgs-Feet below grade surface
2) Top of casing elevations based on a arbitraury datum of l00 feet.
3) Top of casing elevations measured on March 3I, 2009.
3) 0+ indicates the well began flowing after the compression cap was removed.

TABLE. 6A
Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Caro Iin2
Facility 1.D.. "29186 Incident Number.: 30813
Contaminent
of Concern
$e gene
IF.Ih%I
benzcrte
toluene
\ 1ene5
Ace-
rta hthene
:1rc-
na hth, lene
Anthracene
IBednzo(a)-
amhracenc
Benzo(a)-
rcnc
Benzo(b)-
fluoranthene
Benzo(g.h,i)-
lene
Benzo(ky-
fluoranthenc
C:h acne
Dibenzo(a,h)-
andtrcene
Fluor-
antkrene
Fluorenc
Indeno(1.2,3-
cd - rene
Na hthaleue
Phcnan-
[hrenc
Pwcne
4Ie[hrl-
a t hihalcnc
2-llethyl-
na h[haleae
Sacrrplr ID
Dare
C'ollecteri
Source Area
Incident Phase
CSAMW-1
4/112009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<0.18
<0.2
<0.25
<0.22
<0.067
0.84
<0-046
<0.11
<0.047
2
<O 17
0.13 J
<0.073
<0-14
<0.054
1
<0.18
<0.099
<0.062
<0.038
<0.074
<0.056
CSAMW-1-D
41112M
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<0.18
<0.2
<0.25
<0.22
<0.067
<0.057
<0.046
<0.1 I
<0.047
<0.095
<0.17 i
<0-072
<0-073
<0.14
<0.054
1
<OA8
<0.099
<0.062
<0.038
<0.074
<0.056
CSAMW-2
41I12009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<0.18
<0.2
<0.25
<0.22
<0.067
<0.057
<0.046
<0.11
<0.047
2
<0.17
0.14 J
o0.073
<0.14
<0.054
0.98
<0.18
<0.099
<0-062
<0.038
<0.074
<0.056
CSAMW-3
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
0.96 J
4.9
2.7
73
<0.067
<0.057
<0.046
<DA l
<0.047
<O.D95
1 <0.17
<0.072
<0.073
1 <0.I4
<0.054
<0.07
<0.18
<0.099
14
4.2
64
70
CSAMW4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<0-18
<0.2
<0.25
<0.22
<0-067
<0-057
0.11
<0.11
<0.047
2
<0.17
0.I4 J
<0.073
<0.14
<0.054
1.1
<0.18
<0.099
<0.062
<0-038
<0.074
<0.056
MW4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<O.ig
<0-2
<0.25
<0.22
<0.067
<0.057
<0.046
<0.11
<0,047
<0.095
<0-17
<0,072
<0.073
<0.14
<0.054
0.96
<0.18
<0.099
<0.062
<0.038
<0.074
<0.056
MW-15
3127120D9
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<O.18
<0.2
<0.25
<0.22
<0.067
<0.057
<0.046
<0.11
<0.047
<0.095
<OA7
<0.072
<0.073
<0.14
<0.054
1 <0.07
<0.18
<O.D99
<0.062
<0-038
<0.074
<0.056
DDMW-2
10/3/2006
Diesel Dispensers
LSA
1.6
4.7
2.5
8.9
260
4,100
450
140 1
19
u
Nit
NR
NR
NR
950
450
NR
770
620
230
NR
NR
DDMW-2
9/2/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
Ls
<0.16
<037
<0-24
<0-I1
<0-084
<0.59
<0.}1
<0.13
<0.13
<0.17
<0.17
<0A5
<0.19
<0.19
<0.11
<0.16
<0.061
<O.13
<0.074
<1099
<0.076
DDMW-2
12122/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<0.39
<0.48
<0.37
<1.8
<1A
<0.84
<5.9
<l.l
1 <1.3
<1.3
<1.7
<1.7
1 <1.5
<L9
<1.9
<Li
<I.6
<0.61
<13
tl
<0.89
<0.76
2L
Standard
1
550
1 000
530
8O
210
2 10D
0.0479
O.OD479
0.D479
210
OA79
4.79
0.0047
280
280
0.047
21
210
70
NA
14
GCL L
5,ODD
84,500
257,500
87,500
2,120
1,965
2,100
22
L5
0.6
210
OA
4.79
1 0-25
28O
950
31
15,500 _
410
30,DDO
NA
12,500
NC 2B Standard or EPA National Groundwater CnWia (pg/L)i
5
700.0
1,000
10,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
I NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Notes: GCL-Gross Contamination Levels
2L Standard=North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards (GWQS)
Results reported in pg/L & reporting limits are at the method detection limit (MDL)
pg/L-milligrams per liter
J-Estimated value between the reporting limit and MD
NA -Not Applicable
Groundwater standards taken from July 15, 2008 Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action far UST Releases
Bald value indicates detections
Bold and shaded values indicate exceedance of the Soil to Groundwater MSCC
EPA -Environmental Protection Agency
BRL-Below Reporting Limit
Analytical method 8021E used for volatile organic compounds analyses on March 2009
Analytical method 8270C used for polynuclear hydrocarbon analyses on March 2009
CSAMW-I-D is a duplicate sample ofCSAMW-I
DDMW-2 not sampled due to liquid phase hydrocarbons ZLPH)

TABLE 6B
Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facili l.D.: 0-029186 incident Number.: 30813
Analytical Meth
MADEP Volatile Petroluem H drocarbons (VPH)
MADEP Extractable Petroluem Hy drocarbons EPH
C9-C22 Aromatics
Ad usted
C9-C18 Aliphatics
(Ad rusted)
Contarninent of Concern
C5-C8 Aliphatics
xl
C9-Ct0
Aromatics (c)
C9-C12
Ali hatics fa
C11-C22
Aromatics d
C19-06
Ali hatics
C9-Ct8 Aliphatics
h
Sample if]
Date
Collected
Source Area
Inruluu i+llase
CSANIN-1
4/1/2009
Diesel Dis ensen
CSA
9.
1.1
7.1 J
110 J
<36
16.1
110.1
23 J
CSANI'<'<'-1-1)
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
].I
3
1001
<36
<6.4
1003
1Z
CSAMW-2
41I12009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
<1.1
193
130 J
49 J
8.7 J
1303
28.1
CSAMW-3
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
17 J
520
Soo
] 00
1,200
3,900
1,920
39960
CSAMW-4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
al.l
<6.3
140 J
50 J
<6.4
140 J
<12
MW-4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
29
151
1303
<36
<6.4
159 J
<6.4
M W-15
3/27/2009
Diesel Dispenser,
CSA
<9.7
<Ll
<6.3
86 J
<36
<6.4
86 J
<12
DDMW-2
10/3/2006
Diesel Dis users
LSA
NR
530
880
800,000
1.90010M
6.400.000
800.530
400 0
DDMW-2
9/2/2009
Diesel Dispense"
CSA
[9.7
too
210
360
<36
S? .1
460
162
DDMW-2
12/M212009
I Diesel Dis users
CSA
<9.7
50
400
1,600
700
2.800
1,650
3,150
2L Standard
420
NA
NA
210
42,000
4,200
210
4,200
GCL
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NC 2B Standard or EPA National Criteria (p L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Notes: GCL-Grass Contamination Level!
2L Standard=North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards (GWQS'
Results reported in pg/L 8t repotting limits are at the method detection limit (MDL
pg/L-milligrams per liter
J-Estimated value between the reporting limit and MDL
NA -Nat Applicable/Not Analyzed
Groundwater standards taken from July 15, 2008 Guidelines For Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases
Bold value indicates detections
Bold and shaded values indicate exceedance of the Soil to Groundwater MSCC
EPA -Environmental Protection Agency
C9-C22 Aromatic (Adjusted)=c+d
C9•C18 Aliphatics (Adjusted)=(a-c)+b
Sample MW-16-D is a duplicate sample of MW-16
BRL-Below Reporting Limir
CSAMW-I-D is duplicate sample ofCSAMW-I
DDMW-2 not sampled due to liquid phase hydrocarbons (LPH)
NR-Not reported

Table 6C
Groundwater Physical Parameters
TravelCenters of Amcrica
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility 1.D.: 0-029196 Incident Number.: 30813
Temperature
Conductivity
D.U.
TDS
Redox
Location
Date
°C
nH
Slcm
m *Il.
mgAL
mV
5:alinity %
CSAMW-1
41112009
18.2
6.43
0.751
3.09
260
114
0.03
CSAMW-2
4/1/2001
18.6
6.77
0.970
8.96
515
239
0.04
CSAMW-3
4/1/2009
17.6
6.69
3.79
3.47
1,950
64
0.19
CSAMW-4
4/1/2009
18.7
7.27
0.903
6.84
275
23
0.04
MW4
4/1/2009
16A
7.05
0.381
4.79
168
138
0.01
MW-15
3/27/2009
17.4
6.44
1 0.594
1 5.09 j
271
1
109
0.03
DDMW-2
9/2/2009
19.6
6.16
0.92
3.51
440
-29
0
DDMW-2
12/23/2009
16.9
6.30
0.432
NA
290
-33
0
Notes:
. °C-degrees Celsuis
7. DDMW-2 not sampled due to
the presence of product
2. Slem- per centimeter
8. Ali wells were purged by hand bailing
3. mg/L-milligrams per liter
9. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
4. mV-millivolts
measured by laboratory for all samples
5. Meet
10. D.O.-Dissolved Oxygen
6. MW-4 was a flowing well at the time of sampling. 11. NA -Not applicable

APPENDIX A
Groundwater Modeling Documentation and Results
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

INTRODUCTION — Revised 3108*
Quick Domenico.xis (QD) is a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet application of "An Analytical
Model For Multidimensional Transport of a Decaying Contaminant Species", by P.A.
Domenico, Journal of Hydrology, 91 (1987), pp 49-58. QD solves the following
equation with two modifications to be discussed below:
� I erfc [x — 1 +4 v2 gu81+4�Il C(x,y,z,t)=) I2� 11
�J
erf[(y+Y12)124t-ii]—e+---Y12)12�c-4xjj�erf��z+ZI2)2�ax]—e+—ZJ2)12�]}
where:
x = distance from planar source to the location of concern (i.e. property line) along the
center line of the plume.
C(x,y,z,t) = the concentration of the Contaminant at location x, y, z from the source at
time t.
Q, = source concentration - the highest concentration of the contaminant in the
groundwater at the source.
a,,=dispersivity in the x direction.
ay = dispersivity in the y direction .
a,, = dispersivity in the z direction.
erf = error function
erfc = complementary error function
k= hydraulic conductivity.
i = hydraulic gradient
ne = effective porosity (entered as a decimal fraction - (i.e..25)
v = specific discharge. (kiln,)
k =1st order decay constant.
SW = width of source area.

SZ = depth of source area.
x,y,z - these are the spatial coordinates in the horizontal, transverse and vertical
directions that define the point or points where concentration information is desired.
t - this is time since the plume source started moving
In QD this equation has been modified in two ways_
First, "v" has been modified to include a retardation factor
defined as 1+ (KOC*foc*pt,l nj.
where:
KOC = the organic carbon partition coefficient
foc = fraction of organic carbon expressed as a decimal percent
pe= the dry bulk density of the aquifer matrix
and n, = effective porosity.
Secondly, the term "Z12" in the last two error function terms of the equation have been
replaced by "Z" as described by Domenico (1987), page 53, to account for dispersion in
the vertical axis in only the downward direction, as would occur with contaminants at the
water table in a thick uniform aquifer and the source geometry for which this application
is designed.
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
IBM Compatible PC
Windows 3.1 or later
Microsoft Excel 5.0 or later - with Analysis Too] Pack running. (On menu bar, click
Tools, AddIns, Analysis ToolPak)
Intel 486 (or comaptible) or later processor recommended.
General Application Information
Overview
Quick Domenico(QD) calculates the concentration of contaminant species at any point
and time downgradient of a source area of known width, thickness and strength. The
kinds of contaminants for which QD is intended are dissolved organic contaminants
whose fate and transport are can be described or influenced by first order decay and
reaction with organic carbon in the soil. The model allows for first order decay,
retardation and three dimensional dispersion, which will be discussed below. In
addition, QD calculates the concentrations in a two dimensional 5x 10 grid whose length
and width are set by the user. The output of the grid is plotted on an Excel chart each
time the any element of the input data is changed. This allows users to see almost
immediately the effects of changes in input data.

Upon selection and input of the final input parameters, the output can be printed on any
Windows compatible printer using a pre-set print area.
Limitations
QD is based on the Domenico analytical model referenced above. Only a single value of
any one of the 20 or so flow and transport parameters required by the model are allowed
at any one time. Therefore the model should not be used where any of these parameters
vary significantly in direction or magnitude over the model domain. Further, QD uses
physical properties of the soil such as dry bulk density and fraction organic carbon which
are difficult to relate to or determine for fractured bedrock aquifers. Therefore QD
should be used with caution in these environments. Q❑ is primarily intended for use in
unconsolidated (soil) aquifers with reasonably uniform physical and hydrogeologic
properties.
QD is primarily intended for use with dissolved organic compounds and radioactive
compounds that may react with organic carbon in the soil and/or may be subject to
biodegradation or reaction that can be described by 1 st order decay. The fu^st order
decay constant (lambda) should be set to zero where the biodegradability of the
compound or its decay rate is questionable. (e.g. MTBE). QD is not appropriate for use
with organic compounds that are undergoing transformation to daughter compounds (e.g.
TCE to DCE). QD considers compounds individually and assumes no reaction between
compounds.
Despite these many limitations, the Domenico model has been successfully applied to
actual data from contaminated sites. In addition, QD has application as a "conceptual"
model where hypothetical or "worst case" conditions are investigated. By using
conservative input assumptions, QD may be useful in Pennsylvania's Land Recycling
Program in providing quantitative support to qualitative fate and transport analyses
based solely on professional experience or opinion at sites which do appear to justify the
time, expense and data requirements associated with more rigorous numerical modeling
efforts.
Color Scheme
The cells in the spreadsheet have been color coded to assist in use and understanding.
Light Green - these cells allow the user to enter data.
Light Yellow - these cells are locked and calculated by the spreadsheet.
Other Colors - these cells are used for labels and other information not critical to use of
the application.

Units
Where input requires a certain unit of measurement, it has been indicated. Because the
spreadsheet contains internal formulas that depend on the units of the input data, use of
improper units will result in spurious results.
Cell By Cell Description - Input Data
The following section discusses the information that is input cell by cell. The discussion
will emphasize conservative selection of parameters where appropriate.
132: D2 Enter project name
B3 Enter the date that application was prepared.
A9 Source Concentration in mgll - QD allows one source concentration which is
applied to the entire width and thickness dimensions of the source. The source is
presumed to be continuous, which makes QD inherently conservative for use at
sites where sources have been removed or remediated. For conservative use,
enter the highest concentration in the groundwater determined from the site
characterization.
B9 Distance to Location of Concern (x) (in feet) - this is the distance measured from
the source, perpendicular to the water table contours, to the point where a
concentration is desired.
C9 Longitudinal Dispersivity - (Ax) - dispersion parallel to the direction of
groundwater flow and water table.
D9 Transverse Dispersivity - (Ay) - dispersion perpendicular to the direction of
groundwater flow and parallel to the water table.
E9 Vertical Dispersivity - (Az) - dispersion perpendicular to the direction of
groundwater flow and water table. In QD, only vertical dispersion downward
below the water table is considered.
These parameters are dispersion terms which describe the extent to which
contaminants spread out from the source into areas that cannot be accounted for
by advective transport alone. Initially these parameters are often estimated and
then adjusted in order to calibrate a model to better fit actual field conditions.
Several relationships have been proposed for initial estimates of Ax, Ay, and Az.
These are:
Ax- Xl10 where X is the distance a contaminant has traveled by advective
transport (i.e. velocity x time)
Ay = Axl1 Q

Az = Ax120 to Axll q00. In general, it is recommended for conservative use of
QD to use a very small vertical dispersion of .001, unless vertical monitoring and
calibration can reliably justify a larger number. Because of the way QD is set up,
a vertical dispersion of zero cannot be used. A value of about .001 is suggested
for initial uncalibrated or conceptual applications.
F9 Lambda (days) - this is the first order decay constant. It is determined by
dividing .693 by the half-life of the compound (in days). The value is determined
from literature or by calibration to existing data. Dispersivity values and lambda
are the two most important calibration terms available in this application. QD is
very sensitive to the lambda term. For conservative use of QD, use the lowest
lambda from the range of values listed in literature references. For compounds
that are not biodegradable or at sites where biodegradation is not occurring use a
lambda of zero. For initial estimates of lambda, see Appendix A, Table 5 of the
Act 2 regulations.
G9 Source Width (R) - enter the maximum width of the area of contaminated soils
that have been impacted, or the maximum width of free product or smear zone of
contamination measured perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow. Data
should be based on and justified by site characterization data.
H9 Source Thickness - typically this is the thickness of contaminated soils that
contribute contamination to the water table plus the water table fluctuation that
creates a smear zone.
A 14 Hydraulic Conductivity (k)(fllday) - the hydraulic conductivity of a geologic
material is a measure of it's ability to transmit water. The hydraulic conductivity
is determined from pumping or slug tests or, sometimes, laboratory tests using
standard ASTM or other methods described in numerous hydrogeology text
books. QD allows only one hydraulic conductivity measurement to be input. For
conservative use, use the highest conductivity value measured at the site.
B14 Hydraulic Gradient (ft/ft)- this is the slope of the water table in the direction of
ground water flow. QD assumes horizontal flow and a uniform hydraulic gradient
(planar water table). Hydraulic gradient of the water table should be measured at
each site. A minimum of three wells drilled to the same depth into the geologic
formation is required to determine the hydraulic gradient.
C14 Effective Porosity - (decimal fraction- e.g..25) — effective porosity is the
dimensionless ratio of volume of interconnected void spaces in a geologic
material to the total volume of material. Effective Porosity can be determined by
sending soil samples to a laboratory or, if the texture of the material is well
described, by estimating the value from text books or literature references. For
conservative use of QD use a reasonably low effective porosity value from the
range of measured or estimated values.

D 14 Soil Bulk Density -(Pb) (glcm3) - this is the dry weight of a sample divided by its
total volume in an undisturbed state. QD is not particularly sensitive to this
parameter. Samples can be sent to a lab for measurement or a value of 1.8 is
often estimated.
E 14 KOC - this is the organic carbon partition coefficient and is chemical specific.
During formulation of the Act 2 regulations, the Department went to considerable
time and expense, using outside expertise, to develop the most up-to-date KOC
values. These are provided in Appendix A, Table 5, of the Act 2 regulations. Use
these KOC values unless the KOC value is determined for the specific site.
F14 Fraction Organic Carbon (foc) - (decimal fraction) - this is the organic carbon
content of the soil. This value can be determined by a soil laboratory using
ASTM methods. Samples for organic carbon should be taken from the same soil
horizon in which the contaminant occurs, but from an area that has not been
impacted. For conservative use of QD, use the lowest of the range of values
determined or estimated. One/half of one per cent (.005) is a commonly
estimated value.
G14 Retardation - the spreadsheet calculates this value automatically. It is defined as
1 + (KOC* foc *pbtn).
H 14 Velocity (V) - (ftlday) - is the rate of groundwater flow. The spreadsheet
calculates this value automatically from the previous inputs.
A18 This cell is automatically filled by transfer of the `X' coordinate in B7. The value
is repeated here simply to facilitate the view of the x, y and z coordinates for
which the spreadsheet calculates a solution.
1318 `y' (ft) This is the `y' coordinate for which a solution is desired. For a solution on
the centerline of the plume downgradient from the source, y would be set equal to
zero. Otherwise'y' is equal to distance that the location of concern is offset from
the centerline along a line perpendicular to the centerline. Both positive or
negative values may be entered; however, because QD provides a symmetrical
solution, there is no difference in the values obtained.
C 18 `z' (R)This is the `z' coordinate in the vertical axis at x,y of the location of
concern. For most applications this should be left at zero since this value will
yield the highest concentration which is at the water table.
D18 `t' - (days) - this is the time (in days), after a contaminant began moving in the
groundwater, for which a solution is desired. By adjusting the spreadsheet with
the scroll bars so that both the grid, graphic chart and time can be seen at the same
time on the screen, adjusting the time progressively upward provides a graphical
way to determine at what time steady state is reached for the particular set of
input conditions represented by the input data.

C26:C27 These cells are where the user sets the grid dimensions for the 5 by 10 grid
that appears in cells C29::K33. By setting length at 500 ft and width at 50 feet,
for example, the grid would cover a length of 500 feet and a width of 50 feet on
either side of the source origin. Concentrations in the plume are calculated
increments of lengthl10 or 50 feet in this example, and for width/ 2 or 25 feet. By
changing grid sizes, the user will very quickly see how grid dimensions are
affected.
Output Data
A22:B22 These cells contain the source concentration calculated for the specific
location and time defined in A 18 through D 18_
B29:K33 These cells contain the output for the grid defined by the grid dimension
input in A26 and A27. For the grid output, z is fixed at zero by the spreadsheet.
The output from the grid is automatically displayed in a Microsoft Excel chart located
above the grid.
The following data is the minimum that should be derived from the site characterization
for use in many models although specific models may require more:
Source Geometry and Concentration
Groundwater Flow Direction
Hydraulic Conductivity
Hydraulic Gradient
Fraction Organic Carbon unless assumed to be .001
The following data may be derived from literature values or estimated based on other site
characteristics :
Organic Partition Coefficient (Koc)
First -Order Decay Coefficient (Lambda)
Soil Bulk Density
Effective Porosity
* Revised 3-08 to correct the porosity term (n) to effective porosity (ne )

Benzene
ADVECTIVE TRANSPORT WITH THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPERSION, 1ST ORDER DECAY and RETARDATION - WITH CALIBRATION TOO
Prole--t:
i A - reenS oro,
❑ate:
511112010Prepared by
Kent Littletield
Contaminant
lBenzone
NEW QUICK_DOMENICOJXLS
SOURCE
Ax Ay
Az LAMBDA
SOURCE
SOURCE Time(days)
SPREADSHEET APPLICATION OF
CONC
01) (ft)
UP
WIDTH
THICKNESS 8 5
"AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR
(MOIL)
a=.001 day-1
tit
(fI)
MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSPORT OF A
0.0015
2.20E+01 7.33E+0U
1.10E+00 0.001
40
10 3650
DECAYING CONTAMINANT SPECIES"
P.A. Domenico (1987)
Hydraulic
lHydraulic I
IS011 Bulk I
lFrac.
Retard- V
Modified to Include Retardation
Cond
Gradient Pvraslty
I Denslty I KOC
10ra. Carb.
lation (=K*Vn'RI
Point Concentration F-
x y z
220 0 0
x
Conc. At 2201 0
at 36501 days =
MODEL DOMAIN
Length (ft)
40
Idth �tt)
40
4
8�
40
0-000
0-000
20
0-001
0.001
0
0.001
0.001
-20
0-001
0-001
-40
0-000
0-000
Field Data:
Centerline C Concentration
Distance from Source
Centerline Plot (linear)
0-00
o-oa
0-00
u 0.00
0 0-Do
I'll
0.00
0.00
0
16'
-
- - -
20 40
distance
20
omo
9
dl
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0-001
0.000
0-000
0-000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Page 1
60
241
0.000
O.00D
Centerline Plot slog]
1.000 , Model
output
0.100 +Fkcu
Data
Alo
0.001
♦ ♦
0.000
0 10 2d9istance30 40 50
28 321 36 40
0.000 0.000 0-00D 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
O.D00 0.000 0.000 0-000
0.000 0.000 0-000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

2-Methyinaphthaiene
ADVECTIVE TRANSPORT WITH THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPERSION, IST ORDER DECAY and RETARDATION -WITH CALIBRATION
Proyect: reerl5 or0,
Date: 511112010 Prepared by Kent Littlelielcl
Contaminant 2-Methylnaphthalene
i-
TOO
NEW QUICK_DOMENICO.XLS
-
SPREADSHEET APPLICATION OF
"AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR
MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSPORT OF A
DECAYING CONTAMINANT SPECIES"
P.A. Domenico (1987)
Modified to Include Retardation
SOURCE Ax
Ay
Az
LAMBDA ISOURCE SOURCE
Time ay5
CONC {ftj
(ftj
(ft)
IWIDTH THICKNESS
ay5
(MG1L)
a=.001
day-1 (ft) RQ
0.07 2.20E+01 7.33E+00 1.10E+00 0 40 10
3650
Hydraulic Hydraulic I
ISoil Bulk
I
I Frac. a
IV
Cond Gradient jPorosity
jDansity
I KOC
jOrg. Carb. lation
(=K`Iln•R)
(ifldayj (ftlft) (dec. frac.)
cm
R
{ftldayi
3.10E-02 0.073 0.1 1.33 16000 5.00E-0+t 107A 0-000210708
1.000
0-100
L
Centerline Plot (log)
♦ MOM
output
f Field
• Dat,
Point Concentration
Centerline Plot (linear)
0.03 MOM
output
0.02 Field
#
u0.02 Data
00.01
001
0.00
0 20 40 60
distance
-
76 26 24
71
X
y
1
z
220
Q
d
x
x
Conc- Al
220
0
at 3650
days =
0.000
AREAL
MODEL DOMAIN
Length (ft 40
Length
I 40
4 81
_
12
0
10 2@stance 30 40 50
281
32
36
40
40 0.000
0.000
0-000
0-000
0.000
0-000
0.000
0.000
_ 0.000
0.000
20 0.010
0.004
0-001
0-000
0.000
0-000
0.000
0.000
0.0D0
0.000
0 D.020
O.007
.002
0.000
0.000
O.00D
D.000
0.000
0-000
0-000
-20 0-010
0.004
0.001
0.000
O.DOO
0.000
D.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-40 0.000
0-000
0-000
0-000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.060
0-000
Field Data: Centerline C Concentration
Distance from Source
Page 1

ADVECTIVE TRANSPORT
WITH THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPERSION
- reen5 oro, NG
_Project:
Date:
511112010
Prepared by Kent Littletiela
Contaminant
C9-C22 Aromatics
SOURCE
Ax
Ay
Az
LAMB
CONC
00
00
(it)
(MGIL)
a=.001
day-1
1.82 2.20E+01 7.33E+00 1.10E+00
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Soil Bulk
Cand
Gradient
Porosity Density KOC
Mdayf
iwftj
dec. frac. glcm
3-1DE-02 0.073 0.1 1.33
(Point Concentration
0
[..onC. At
at
dais =
MODEL DOMAIN
Length (tt) 40
jVvidth40
4 8
40
O.Dfl3
0.013
20
0.350
0.196
0.693
0.366
_-20
0.350 0.196
-40
0.003 0.013
Field Data:
Centerline C Concentration
Distance from Source
C9-C22 Aromatics
1ST ORDER DECAY and RETARDATION - WITH CALI
Frac.
Centerline Plot (linear)
0.s0
0.70
0-60
„0.50
0 0.40
n 0.30
0-2a
0.10
0-00
0
-
20 40
distance
60
0.
12
16
20.
24
0.012
0.006
0.D03
0.001
0.090
0.034
0.010
0.0031
0.156
0-055
0.016
.00
0.090
0-034
0-010
0.003
0.012
0.006
0.003
0.001
Page 1
NEW QUICIG_DOMENICO.XLS
SPREADSHEET APPLICATION OF
"AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR
MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSPORT OF A
DECAYING CONTAMINANT SPECIES"
P.A. Domenico (1987)
Modified to Include Retardation
Centerline Plot (log)
1,D00
+ *
•
D.1 DD
,
0.010
08)01
D 000
0.000
D 10 `tT1stance30 40 5o
28 32 36 40I
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
D.000
0-000
0-001
-0
00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.000
0.1OD
0.000
0-000

APPENDIX B
CAP Calculations
The Benham Companies, LLC - an SAIC company

Appendix B
Greensboro Travel Center, Whitsett, NC
TravelCenters of America
Calculation of Hydrogen Peroxide Oxidation Reaction
for Residual Hydrocarbons in Well ❑DMW-2
Estimate of Residual Petroleum Hydrocarbon in DDMW-2:
❑DMW-2 is 2-inch well with 25 feet of water = 15 L
Dissolved Concentration 4.8 mg/L EPH X 15 L = 0.073 g
Minimum Detectable Free Product* at <0.01' = 4.1 g
Total Hydrocarbons = 4.2 g
Molecular Weight
Petroleum Fuel (C15-H32): 237 glmole
Hydrogen Peroxide (H2-02): 34 glmole
Reaction Balance:
If:
Then:
15 1-12-02 + C15-H32 = 30 H20 + 15 CO2
15 moles H2O2 X 34 glmole = 510 g H2-02; and
1 mole C15-H32 X 235 glmole = 235 g C15-H32
Ratio of 1-12-02 to C15-H32 far complete reaction
Amount of Hydrogen Peroxide for Complete Reaction:
Using the Ratio of 2.17 H2-02 to C15-H32, the
approximate 1-12-02 for complete reaction is:
As a safety factor and to assure treatment of the
DDMW-2 filter pack as well as the well internal
surfaces assume a 3X amount of 1-12-02 at:
Hydrogen Peroxide density =
Hydrogen Peroxide at 5% dilution contains:
2.17:1
9.1 g
27.3 g
1430 g1L
71.5g/L
Therefore: approximately 0.4 Liter 5% Hydrogen Peroxide is needed.
* currently no free product has been detected for over 1 year.

Oxygen Release Compound (ORC*)
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET (MSDS)
Last Revised: September 14, 2009
Section 1 - Material Identification
Supplier:
REGENESIS
1011 Calle Sombra
San Clemente, CA 92673
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: infn(rr_regentsis,com
Chemical Description: A mixture of Magnesium Peroxide (M902), Magnesium
Oxide (MgO), and Magnesium Hydroxide [Mg(OH)�1
Chemical Family: Inorganic Chemical
Trade Name: Oxygen Release Compound (ORC ]
Product Use: Used to remediate contaminated soil and groundwater
(environmental applications)
Section 2 — Chemical Identification
CAS# Chemical
14452-57-4 Magnesium Peroxide (Mg02)
1309-48-4 Magnesium Oxide (MgO)
1309-42-8 Magnesium Hydroxide [Mg(OH)�1
7758-11-4 Dipotassium Phosphate (11K204P)
7778-77-0 Monopotassium Phosphate (H2K04P)
Assay: 25-35% Magnesium Peroxide (Mg02)
110perations\MSDS10RC Page 1

Regenesis - ORC MSDS
Section 3 - Physical Data
Melting Point:
Not Determined (ND)
Boiling Point:
ND
Flash Point:
Not Applicable (NA)
Self -Ignition Temperature:
NA
Thermal Decomposition:
Spontaneous Combustion possible at = 150°C
Density:
0.6 — 0.8 glcc
Solubility:
Reacts with Water
pH:
Approximately 10 in saturated solution
Appearance:
White Powder
Odor:
None
Vapor Pressure:
None
Hazardous Decomposition
Not Known
Products:
Hazardous Reactions:
Hazardous Polymerization will not occur
Further Information:
Non-combustible, but will support combustion
Section 4 -- Reactivity Data
Product is stable unless heated above 150 °C. Magnesium
Stability: Peroxide reacts with water to slowly release oxygen.
Reaction by product is Magnesium Hydroxide
Conditions to Avoid: Heat above 150 °C. Open Flames.
Incompatibility: Strong Acids. Strong Chemical Agents.
Hazardous Polymerization: None known.
J:\0pera1ions\MSDS''k0RC MSDS PaLe 2

Regenesis - ORC MSDS
Section 5 - Regulations
Permissible Exposure Not Established. Should be treated as a nuisance dust.
Limits in Air
Section 6 - Protective Measures, Storage and Handling
Technical Protective Measures
Stora^c: Keep in tightly closed container. Deep a►►a} from
combustible material.
Handling: Use only in well ventilated areas.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Respiratory Protection: Recommended (HEPA Filters)
Hand Protection: Wear suitable gloves.
Eye Protection: Use chemical safety goggles.
Other: NA
Industrial Hygiene: Avoid contact with skin and eyes
Protection Against Fire & NA
Explosion:
Disposal: Dispose via sanitary landfill per state/local authority
Further Information: Not flammable, but may intensify a fire
After Spillage/Leakage/Gas Collect in suitable containers. Wash remainder with copious
Leakage: quantities of water.
Extinguishing Media: NA
Suitable: Carbon Dioxide, dry chemicals, foam
Self contained breathing apparatus or approved gas mask
Further information: should be worn due to small particle size. Use extinguishing
media appropriate for surrounding fire.
After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of
First Aid: water and soap. In case of contact with eyes, rinse
immediately with plenty of water and seek medical attention.
Section 7 - Information on Toxicology
JA(VerationslMSDS10RC MSDS Page 3

Regenesis - DRC MSDS
Toxicity Data: Not Available
Section 8 - Information on Ecology
M'ater Pollution Hazard 0
Raging (WGK):
Section 9 - Further Information
After the reaction of magnesium peroxide with water to form oxygen, the resulting
material, magnesium hydroxide, is mildly basic. The amounts of magnesium oxide
(magnesia) and magnesium hydroxide in the initial product have an effect similar to lime,
but with lower alkalinity.
The information contained in this document is the best available to the supplier at the time
of writing, but is provided without warranty of any kind. Some possible hazards have been
determined by analogy to similar classes of material. The items in this document are
subject to change and clarification as more information become available.
]:1OperationslMSDS\ORC MSDS Page 4

� r j
a s• }mom ' ' �
Gremweson Road
�2
.� UST System + ��
r � '
�•, `� �� — ��-
Pa�ceprive y�
inrerstate 85 -�
� r �
I
O <1
_..
.,-
Note: The base map is from the USGS Gibsonvitle 7.5 mrn. Quadrangle.
Legend
0 250 5w 1.000
- - - Surface Water
Fee[
i Property Boundary TRAVELCENTER5 OF AMERICA
GREENSBORO FACILITY
❑nsite Buildings N I ini NC Krr1IWAY 61, W111TSErr. N
Site Location Nap
Imo., AIiI . It'i'osr4 pp P74 "'urr rno
Ie 5•Io•lo Jr1r dme O I
ro. fl.nu _I
GIB re.eon
K:�GIS_Oa1MTXWhi1sett. 616ProodsGM13 - CARFig1-Topomap.rrmxd

a
0
f
ti r* r
•
Note: The base map is from the USGS Gibsonville 7.5 min. Quadrangle.
Legend
0 250 5w I.DOO
Cross Section Axes
Fee[
PzZg - Metamorphosed Quartz Diorite TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA
GREENSBORO FACILITY
Property Boundary N 1101 NC IIIGH WAY 61. wrtlTSFTT. NC
❑nsite Buildings Site Geology Niap
Surface Water 3
"'b-
K:IGIS-DatmTAwhitseh. NcTrc*-SsQ0813 - GARFig3-f eology.mxd

Im,
Elna[hm{furl]
o
+j/j11111111111 �N
llllllllll
� 11111�,IJI,I,11111111J1I1, +� a� �
11 111111,
� 11JIJ,1,1,1,11 J1111 • . ,
11111111J1111 `I 11
z •.
t�If11111'lllrllllllll�l�l�l�lllir1�1�1�1�1� �i � I � �
lllllr
'i1111���111111/11111111.111111�1�1
� Illlll�lll�llll r I ;I•,
f 11111111����
I � � 111I1J1 � � 111111 f�lilili!',IIIIj1j1I +t �'
i111111111111
� 111r'��Illiiii�l!1IIJIl,II�
111111111111111,. � .
I 111111111J11 � 11
1111111,11111111111,111,11;!j: t
1f1I�11111111111i�II''�';:
1�11,J,111,11JI J1lll I l l l l l
11111111111111111111111'111;1;/;� ?-r -�'
1 E l1i �''i'i''i'II�IJ,�,�lf,ll�l���
,llii 1 > > 1111111111'r'lllllll;llil
� Ililil�11J11111 � 1111111 I J / 11 • � �
i-
illlllllllllll fllljl/1111111
�,I111111111J11 ���1111111 •�I
111111 11111111111�,','s, .P 1 I I ='
�JI11J111Jl11r111111, /1 � 1 J I J I 11 ��:!
1 1�, 1 11` 1 I rl 111 1
+Il11111111 J11 / •j;ii
111111 -11 r 1111111 `I1 �
�Illll`Il •
lllll r"r r 11111'll I
�, , 111111111111'111 l 11 jl,'IJI 111 i i
Illjljl j1j111111111111jIJ / 11 1 1 I •
�11111/11l111111�11111,1,1, I:�_;
,111111 �1111111111'1 ;, � ! i
�IIIIJ,I,IjljIlllllllll11I11�1;�;1r i.
I,11111111,1,1,1,1,�llll�lyl,l ;, •; • ; ;; :;
f�ri/i'1'I 1j1;1111111JIJ111J,1
,Illll'lllll�ll�j,flll+i�i�!i� �i�!�
I �JIJ111I111111,1,Jjljlj�ri�ji+�•E�j�+
In
ti
Ei=

LEGEND
MW-1
MONITORING WELL
MVP-1
SOIL VAPOR IMPLANT
+DP--1
DUAL PHASE ExTRAGFIoN WELL
SUST W-1
UST FIELD MONITORING WELL
UST
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
AST
ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK
�E
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
UT---
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE
I r- V
STORM SEWER LINE
—SS—
SANITARY SEWER LINE
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
--TD-- TRENCH DRAIN LINE
OMH MANHOLE
DROP INLET
150' D 150'
pill
SCALE IN FEET

A
a
Mw-4 CSASB-7
CSASB-S CSAMw-3 DONW-3 C3ASB-3
CSASS-5 CSASB-4 CaAMw-i
:.. .. — .. _
— CSASB-2
.01
met
Horizontal Scale I" = 40'. x X X - Asphah & Gravel
Groundwater Eb:valian (0) based on 1r2WO09 dala.
Bedrock
!Nowell W& available for .%P%-d.
He►mliom bused upon an arhitmin dAtutn. _ —T ' tiaprvlilr {lands I'Ir� ti( lad �
Geologic Crass -section North to South at dispenser pad. FIGURE 4

N
Elevation (fret)
G
111111111lr11
11111111y111 fllllllll'Ill rill yt l'1 y 11 ! 1 11111 , , i
1 , , ,1111 rfllllrl'1'1'1'1'Illlrlrlrlllrlilili' ! ! i
lllljljl jll 111 � 1111
11111111111�11111111 � ,,,,,11111jtl1/11'1'f`t:i��
1 r l,,, l l 11'1'1'111'1'1 rl'1 �I'1'1'111'11 � 111 l 1 i
,I,f1l1111�11111'l 1111111
1111111 rllll jl/11'1'11 /'1 jljl jlj111111/rll�llr Jrlll'lllrllljljlj,i � � i � i �
,llllrf l l � 1111
t r l l r l rfllll'1'111'1'1'1�1�1�I�I�rilili�rjrj'j'j'1'1'1'llf�l�l�l�l�lilili�
�llllll
Illllllllllllr Illlll �:,�;�
l 1 ! 111111111,111 jljlj1111�1�1�1�111Illllll�l�l�l�l�l�flll�lllfj'jll l � � � � ; ; '
,!,lllltlrl�l'1'l'11 � I l l l l
111 111 ,rlrlllrll,l,,/ll'��'1111 � .,.
�Iflll111
. t 11llllll f111111'IIl'1'1'l'1'l 11 � l l l l l l l lrfj 1111 11111 , i : � : ,
JI1 I1111111111'I'lrlrlrt11111111Illlll ,,11 :,,�
.1111r11lr/ 11111 ! !
1111111tllltl1111'1'1'1rl'111'1'r'1'11 j!/ I l l l l I jlllllllrljljlllrflf : �
11
1 111 r 111'l'Ir 1 1 1 l' r l l' 11' r 11
�Illlrlllllllllllllllllllllllll/IIIIIII�I1111111I i
�,1,l,',f ; Irlll'�l�l�llr'llllrl,',I,1'l'11f111I1�r�r�lllrl f1I,1,'111''I,II',1,�'�I�IIr' ;
SOF
t111111111111111 ] / 11
Il11111111111111111111 11111111'lltltlll, ���r��!
�1111111111111111�1111111111111111111111111�11Irlllllllllllll i�t i'•'.
�1111111
111111111111111' fillll/!1 ':,��ii
Ifllllllllllllllll1111
111111111111111111111
I11111t11I111111111111111
1111111 1ill�Illllll 11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIlllj1111llllllllfll I :,:, 1111111111t11111 "� I l l l l l '1'I'Ir''' Illlll Ill 1
Illlll �
�111111111111111 1 ! 11 l 1111 flljljlj full � � i
11111111 l 11111111111j1jlj�l�l�l�t�llllllll�l�/�I�I�I�Illlljl jl,lll I t 11,11' l l :�
,,lrllll!'lllillll tI,,,Irlfllllllllll,,,rr11lf/l111! ��,:,
rlll�lrl,J,I,I, l l ,,,,111
I 1 !Illlll 1,1,lililililrlrjrjllll'1'1'lrlll�l�lililililillll jl jllllll'I'lllll�l�lilili �' ; `;
I�I�IIIIrIII,I, jlllllllf l 111111
111111111111'l'1'/'1'111'I�I�Ijljljllllll�l�'�'j'1'1'1'Itl'I�f�ljljljllllll�l � � i � i
r11I1lllll�l11111111 ! 1
r r 1111111111111I11111111'1'1,1�1�11111111�,�,�1�,111111111'1,1'I�I�II/tllll�l�l�l�llll j� i i
f111111,111'11111tI11111f11t1,I11,IlI IIIIIII111111t1111f11r11111111I111111
rlflll11lllrl,,,,1r111111111 11111 /11lllll,/,/il � � �!;
ll 1 11 I11111111'J'llllrlll llllr l ��'
,f11r fllllll�lrl'11111111
, r t t, l l r llllrl'1'1'1'1'Irl�l�l�l�rililil�jlj'j'�'1'1'1'Ir1�1�1�1�lilililijljlj1�t111 ��; `• i
rl�lll/11I1111
111111111111111111I11'llflllfylllll�iiiilllllllllll��iiilllllll,l
1 11111111"rrr1111�����r"'rll,'1'111 ' I ;i.
1 jljllll l l l l l l l l l _ 1111 111
lllllllllllililllllllllrl1111� t111r 11 11t11 i:i:
lllllflll flll'1'll�l�l'1 Jl'l�l�l�t111,111� I�I,I11,Ir11�1't�l'1'l�l�ll,11111� f�1,111,11�11111J1't�t , i
0
0
a
W
9

LEGEND
s MW-5J MONITORING WELL
CSA"-1 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
MONITORING WELL
.CSA--SB' COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING
9MW-4 STORM SEWER LINE
TM)CK SCALES DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
CSA-SB9
CSA-S88 1- 2'
CSA-S81 u
Compound
Result
B =
0.910
I
x = 5.54 csA-SBB
� i
CSA-SF17
� CSA-SB11
3
■CSA-SB12
f _
CSA-SB13
CSA-SB6
CSAMW-3;
CSAI(W-4
CSA-S85
CSA-SO14
r
csA-sees
LCSA-SB?6
CSA-SB4
f
csA-5817
cSA-sB3 �
f
s --
TRUCK DIESEL FUELING DISPENSM AND CANOPY
CSA-SB17 2-3
Compound
Result
B =
0.047,1
N =
7.3
2-Mn
17
-4,18 R
11,040
M Ar
2,220
I CSA-SB2 3-4 CSA-5B2 csA-sB1B
�; CSA-SB18 1-2
am nd Result ound Result
C9 -(72 k 61.43 I CSA-Se19 = 3.2
CSA-SB1 Al
9 CSAIM-1
f,MH
4-OW-2
CSA-SB18 5 6
Result
nMn
1.2
4.6
A-�
WELL 10
DEPTH
compoun
B =
Benzene
x =
Xylenes
IN =
Naphthalene
2---Mn
2—Meth
na hthalene
-L18 Al
C9—C18
Ali hatics
-M k
C9—C22
Aromatics
ALL RESULTS MEASURED IN MILLIGRAMS PER
KILOGRAMS (mg/kg)
ONLY RESULTS EXCEEDING THE MSCCS ARE
SHOWN
40' 0 40'
SCALE IN FEET

i I GRASS
Cn
CSANW-3
95.09
CSA-5� l
DDMW-3 'f
93.45
CSA-SEI4
CSA-m
1 1
CSA-SBs ■I
�]tw—fib ��
�9 �89.19 _sra+I-
TRUCK DIESEL FUEUNG DISPENSERS AND dWOPY
CSA-SBII
LCSA-S912
CSA-5813
ISCSAMW--4
95.53
CSA--SBI4
iA-San
CSA-SB19 f'
LEGEND
s MW-5
MONITORING WELL
CSAMW-1
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
S
MONITORING WELL
■C5A-SBf
COMPREHENSkVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING (MARCH 2O09)
STORM SEWER LINE
DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
85.68
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN FEET
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
IN FEET
•
ELEVATION NOT USED IN CONTOURING
4 ' 0 Q.
SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND
SMW-5 ,MONITORING WELL
SCSAMW-1 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
MONITORING WELL
�� ■CSA-S81 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING (MARCH 2OG9)
9MW-4 STORM SEWER LINE
92.79
TRUCK SCALES DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
. LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) (APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
95.78 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN FEET
o
�95 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
csA_s89 r IN FEET (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
INTERPRETED GROUNDWATER FLOW
DIRECTION
CSA-SB10
TRUCK MESEi FUMUNG DWENSUM AND CANOPY
1 k ACSA-sa11
CSA -Se7 �1
i
• ACSA-SB12
CSA-SB13
92 CSA-sae 1 C5AMW-4
C$AMW-3 + 95.78
95.21
CSA-SR14
CSA-Sa1S —
89-73
CSA-SO16 —
GSA
1
I f CySA-SO17 4 O 40'
' 1 - scmz IN FEET
sale �► _
CSA-SB2
r CSA-Sat TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA
r-
�..._ - �- 1141 NC HIGHWAY fit, WHITSETT. NC
f ocsAmw-1 94 a � Y ' 53 GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
j 85.17 o, t , f `0� MAY 28, 2009
i GMW-15 cn c ,1m
Bt71 co Iv6 "° 01-ISM-04-7884-M
co uH Me "O' 7880-: 02.dwg

t
LEGEND
&MW-5 MONITORING WELL
9CSAMW-1 MONITOR E WELL SITE ASSESSMENT
.CSA-SB1 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT
SOIL BORING
B-4 STORM SEWER LINE
-MUCK SCALES DRAIN LINE
DIESEL FUEL DISPENSER LINE
LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING
(2007) [APPROXIMATE LOCATION]
I � CSA-S89
&csA-se,o
4 � 4
l -
CSA-sea
CSA-SB7
ACSA-SB11
W-3
Result
�CSA-selx
70 y
E24182❑ CSA-SB6
1,300 CSAMW
,
7
csA-sets
CSAU
-4
TRUCK DIESEL FUELING WENSERS AND CANOPY
EC5AIMW-4
om ound
Result
B h f =
1 2
CSA-SB14
CSA-SB5
CSA-S81s
DD�[1I—� 9' = �� y- --
NS 1 CSA-SB16
CSA-SB4
CSA-S817
CSA-sea A
CSA-S81a '
CSA-SB1f49 A4
9 CSAIEW-2 tauac
*CSA-mw-1 — GARAGE
CSAMW-1 CSAMW-2 _ �
�1[1I-15 om ound Result om aund Result r'
ND Bbf = 2 Bbf= 2
WELL. ID
om ound
6 b f =
Benxv h fluoranthene
2-Mn
2-Math na htholene
-@ k=
Cg-C22 Aromatics
-0 k =
C11-C22 Aromatics
ND NON -DETECT OR BELOW THE
2L STANDARDS
NS NOT SAMPLED; LIQUID PHASE
HYDROCARBON (I,PH) PRESENT AT
TIME OF SAMPLING
ALL RESULTS MEASURED IN MICROGRAMS PER
LITER (pg/L)
NOTES:
1. ONLY RESULTS EXCEEDING THE 2L STANDARDS ARE
SHOWN.
2. DUPLICATE GROUNDWATER SAMPLE OF CSAMW-1
INDICATES NO DETECTION OF BEN20(B)FLUORANTHENE
4 ' 0 40'
SCALE IN PEEP

XWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division Oi Water Quality
Beverly -aver Perdue I.-oleen H. Suiltns
:;overno` Director
February 10, 20 11
Peter Ward, Senior Vice President of Construction
TA Operating Corporation
24601 Center Ridge Road
Westlake. Ohio 44145
Ref; Issuance of Injection Permit M'10400164
TravelCenters of America - Greensboro Travel Center
Whitsett. Guilford County. North Carolina,
Dear Mr. Ward:
Dee Freeman
Secretan
In accordance with the application and supporting data received on November 17, 2010, we are forwarding permit number
W10400164. This permit is to inject Regenisis Oxygen Releasing Compound (magnesium peroxide) to remediate
groundwater contaminated with diesel fuel at the facility referenced above. This permit shall be effective from the date of
issuance until January 31, 2013, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the
requirement to submit a final project evaluation as stated in PART VII - MONITORING AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS. Please note that some of the monitoring requirements have changed from your application. Please
read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
You will need to notify this office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. in order to
continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew
the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at [phone] or david.goodrichCamcdetingov if
you have any questions about your permit.
}}Best Regards,
David L. Goodrich
Hydrogeologist II
cc: Sherry Knight. Winston-Salem Regional Office
Kent Littlefield, Benham Companies. LLC — SAIC. 631 tl Allentown Boulevard, Hatrisbu gg. PA 17112
Mindy Lepard. Incident Manager. Guilford County Environmental Health Department. 400 West Market Street, Suite 300.
Greensboro. NC 27401
W10400164 Permit File
I WFER PROT=710N SECTON
1635 Mail Service ::enter, Ralergrs, Noun Carolina 27,599.1636
Lowian. 2"28 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. NoMh Camana27S4
pnome 91G-'33.32?1 1 FAX t 919.715-058£ FAX 2 9*-715-GM3' :Otvr,=_r krvice
interne wwn ncwa ual .o
uuai 'j=rrtjrw gins aiaE_ iwn ,r zmr9,sv►,
Cinv
NorthCarohna
F. /wl'r rllp

&r
ANr.:.�.CC...�
HCDGNR
Nolh 1. al ohna Depart1T ent of Environment ar d Natural ResnurGu5
DIvislorl ,f VVate- Qualliv
aevei I =ave- Perctic L O'r,`E1l h sullim
Savcmc- Drector
December 9. 2010
Peter ❑V and
TA Operating Corporation
24601 Center Ridge Rd.
VA ",�tlake. OH 44145
Subjects Acknowledgement of Application No. W/0400164
Travel Centers of America -Greensboro Travel t_ ,onter
Infection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well 01)
Guilford
Dear Mr. Ward:
Lr,.0 : r-2-a
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of your pen -nit application and
supporting, materials on November 12. 2010. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be
reviewed by David Goodrich.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the
maximum efficiency in processing permit applications. the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests.
Piease be aware that the Division's Regional Office. copied below, must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division. Please also note at this time. processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt ❑ra complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact David Goodrich at 910-715-6162, or via e-mail at dat,id.gnodrich(u'ncdenr.grn If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message. and they will respond promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized. To
review our new organizational than, go to httn:. 'IC"o,enr.stase.nc.us! docu mcnis, d \v q— rhsn.pdf:
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHFN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sinc Iv.
For Debra J. WIts
Supervisor
cc- Winston-Salem Regional Office. Aquifer Protection Section
Kent Littlefield (Benham Companies. LLC — SAIC. 6310 Allentown Bouievard. Harrisburg. PA 1711=`)
Permit Application File W !'04001 t,4
. , _.sti .��I ? , _ . _ .�'-I�:.. I�'. ..'.::•inn-.. � •tk

an SAIC company
November 11. 2010
Mr. Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Underground Injection Control Program Manager
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
RE: Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection
Greensboro Travel Center
1101 NC 61, Whitsett, Guilford County, NC
Incident Number 30813
Dear Mr. Slusser:
n
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), Benham Companies, LLC submits the attached Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) for remediating a diesel fuel release and the Permit to Construct and/or Use a Well(s)
for Injection {the Application} at the captioned property. The CAP, prepared for and approved by the
NCDENR Division of Waste Management UST Section, proposes Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC)
in two groundwater monitoring wells to enhance biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in
groundwater. The Application requests permission from the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR) to place ORC in the groundwater of two wells.
These submittals are in response to your letter of November 3, 2010 requesting information addressing
Section V of the Application. The geologic information requested in Section V of the Application are
contained by the relevant passages in the CAP as cited on the Application
We trust submittals will meet your approval. Please respond to the undersigned with any questions or
your approval.
Respectfully,
BENHAM COMPANIES, LLC
.�T
Kent V. LittIefield, L. G.
6310 Allentown BoulevardlHarrisburg, PA 171121Phone [phone]/Fax [phone]www. saic. com

eBEIV
HAM
an 5AIC company
October 25, 2010
U IC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center }
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
RE: Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection
Greensboro Travel Center
1101 NC 61, Whitsett, Guilford County, NC
Incident Number 30813
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), Benham Companies, LLC submits the attached Application
for Permit to Construct and/or Use a Weil(s) for Injection at the captioned property. The purpose of this
application is to obtain permission from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) to place Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) in two groundwater monitoring
wells to enhance biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater.
ORC is powdered magnesium peroxide in a porous fabric sock manufactured by Regenesis.
About 15 pounds will be placed in each of two wells to be treated. On immersion in water ORC
gives off oxygen in a slow bubbling action over about one year. The material increases
dissolved oxygen in soil and groundwater and promotes aerobic bacteria metabolism of the
hydrocarbon residuals. Bioremediation enhanced with ORC was recommended in the May 28,
2010 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Incident Number 30813. The CAP was prepared for and
approved by the NCDENR Division of Waste Management UST Section on July 12, 2010,
We trust this explanation and UIC application will meet your approval and are prepared to implement it
upon your direction. Please respond to the undersigned with any questions or your approval.
Respectfully,
BENHAM COMPANIES, LLC
rt
Kent V. Littlefield, L. G. t
cc: Cindy H. Rintoul, L. G., NCDENR, Division of Waste Management UST Section
Emily L. Gloeckler, P.G., TravelCenters of America
63 10 Allentown BoulevardlHamsburg, PA 171121Phone [phone]Fax [phone]www.salc.com

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverty Eaves Perdue. Govemor Civision of Waste Management Dee Freeman, Secretary
UST Seal Dexter R Matthews. Director
TravelCentcrs of America
Attn: Mr. James Schenker
24601 Center Ridge Road, Suite 200
Cleveland, OH 44145
July 12, 2010
Re: Notice of Regulatory Requirements
15A NCAC 211-0407(b)
Risk -based Assessment and Corrective Action
For Peimlcum Underground Storage Tanks
TravelCenters of America-H
1101 NC 61, Whitsett
Guilford County
Risk Classification: High
Ranking: 190D
Dear Mr. Schenker.
The Corrective Action Plan (CAA) received on June 3, 2010 has been reviewed by the UST
Section, Winston-Salem Regional Office. The plan and the schedule are hereby approved, with the
following modifications: groundwater samples are to be analyzed by EPA methods 602 and 625 annually
and by MADEP EY11 and VP1l methods semiannually. If EPA methods 602 or 625 detect contaminants
atmve the 2L standards, that analysis method will be required during serniarrnual sampling.
Failure to implement the plan and schedule in the manner and time specified may result in the
assessment of civil penalties anchor the use of other enforcement mechanisms.
If coverage under the Leaking Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Funds (,Funds) tsar
been previously granted or is anticipated, failure to implement the plan and schedule in the manner and
time specified in the CAP may result in potential loss of coverage. Failure to practice cost effective
implementation of the plan, including soil and groundwater monitoring and operation and maintenance of
any rear celial system(s) until the dale on which cleanup goals arc met, will aJso jeopardise reimbursement
of reasonable and accessary costs from the Funds.
Effective October 1, 2004, the Department requires that all work following the submittal of the
Limited Site Assessment Report (T?tle 15A NCAC 2L .0405) be preapproved if State Trust Fund
•rimbursement is anticipated. To comply with this requirement, a completed PreapprovsllCiaim
Au[horiration For n, encompassing the required remedial activities, must be received in this office within
14 days of the date of this letter. Upon completion of the preapproved activities, you should submit your
claim promptly. Reimbursement funds are budgeted based on completed preapprovals, but lengthy delays
in reimbursement can occur if claims are not submitted immediately following wont completion.
An EgtW GPPWur.dy e A ftrnaM Aden EI olWer i.;O % Rft- rL o I IO % Post f.cnsu"-r PSpW

If you have any questions regarding trust fund eligibility or reimbursement Crorn the Commercial
or Noncommercial Leaking Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Funds, please contact the
UST Section Trost Fund Branch at [phone]. if you have any questions regarding the actions that
must be taken or the rules mentioned in this letter, please contact Mundy Lepard at [phone] or the
address listed below for Guilford County Environmental Health.
Sincerely,
Cindy . Rirnoul, L.G.
[regional Supervisor
'.'Vinton -Salem Regional Office
UST Regional Offices
Asheville (ARt7) - 2090 US Highway 70. Swannanoa, NC 28778 (978) 296450
Fayetteville (FAY) - 225 Green Street, State 714, Systel Building, Fayetteville, NC 28301 [phone]
Mooresville (Pat 0R) -- bl U East Ce tter Avenue Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 281 15 (704) 663-16"
Raleigh (RRO) - 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699 (919) 7914290
Washington (WAS) - 943 Washington Square Mali, Washington, NC 27889 (252) 9464481
Wilmlogtoo (WIL) - 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 (910) 7%-7215
Winston-Salern (WS) 58S Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone]
Gutiford County E o virea moats I Realth, 400 West Market Street, Suite 300. GreR]Sboro, NC 27401, [phone]
FTP CAP;tppra%ai NOR0209.dot
Ar,Epual OPPAL PIV 1 ARr nnft A;,ntpn Emooyer 50'4 aet)tied 10 w Post t;onJww PW

_A[a r AFER PROTECTION SECTION_
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Date: December 28, 2010
To; ❑
Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
❑
Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
❑
Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS
❑
Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
❑ David May, WaRO-APS
❑ Charlie Stehman, W iRO-APS
X Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
From: David Goodrich, Land Application Unit
Telephone: [phone]? Fax. [phone]
E Marl: david.g_oodrichAncdenr. oo
A. Permit Number: WI0400164
B. Owner: TA Operating Comoration
C. Facility/Operation: Travel Centers of America — Greensboro Travel Center
X Proposed ❑ Existing X Facility X Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ AnimaI ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon X GW Remediation: 5I Injection Wells
❑ UIC - (5A7) open loop geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
1. Project Type: X New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. II Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Statutory Date:
Attached. you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
X Return a Completed APSARR Form. - Please comment
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment 13 Certification from the RO.*
Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, snake a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer:
Date:
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1

AQUIFER PRrECTIQN REGIONAL STAFF REP0111, prat orrSedioRi
JAN 11 2011
Date: January 21, 2411 County: Guilford
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office Permittee: TA Operating Corp -
Central Office Reviewer: David Goodrich Project Name: Travel Centers of America -Greensboro
Regional Login No: Application No.: W]I0400164
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ® New ❑ Renewal
❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification ❑ Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ® Yes or ❑ No.
a. Date of site visit: January 21, 2011
b. Person contacted and contact information: Kent Littlefield, consultant, 717-901-8843 and Steve Sutton, the
store manager.
c. Site visit conducted by: Shuying Wang, WSRO
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ® No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application convect?
❑ Yes or ® No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
e. Regulated Activities 1 Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Infection Sites:
(If muitiule sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and -paste_ a new section into the
document for each site or attach additional pages for each site
a. Location: 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC 27377, Guilford
b, Driving Directions: From WSRO. take I-40 east, through Greensboro for total of about 40 miles., exit at
exit# I 38/Gibsonville/Whitsett toward Gibsonville for 0.3 miles the site will be on the right
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Gibsonville
d. Latitude: 33 03 51 N Longitude: 79 33 50 W
IL NEW AND MAJOR MODIFICATION_ A_ PPLICATIONS (this section not needed for renewals_ or minor
modifications, skip to next section
Description Of Waste(S) And Facilities
1, Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
FORM: 20110121- W 10400 t 64

AQUIFER PRu fECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
Desciription Of Well{SAnd Facilities — New, Renews! And Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heatinglcooling water return flow (5A7)
❑ Closed-Ioop heat pump system (5QMl5QW)
® In situ remediation (5I)
❑ Closed-Ioop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5LP Non -Discharge")
❑ Other (Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ® No
3, Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑ No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? Onsite diesel and gasoline underground storage tanks. piping. and
disRensers
What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)? at the source area
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 100 -150 feet
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed andlor existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ® No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: The sampling plan proposed in the CAP attached with the application does
not meet the need of the Aquifer Protections Section. To monitor whether the injection will have any adverse
impact on the groundwater quality and the migration of the plume, and to monitor reactions between injectant
and contaminants, field parameters, including pH, temperature, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen, in
CSAMW-3, CSAMW-4 and DDMW-2 should be measured before injection, weekly for the first month and
then monthly for the first three months after injection. Samples for lab analytical parameters should be
collected one and three months, respectively, after the injection. A complete report summarizing injection and
monitoring activities and results should be submitted to the Aquifer Protection Section Winston-Salem
Regional Office within 60 days after all samples are collected. (If central office needs one, request another
cony)•
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
FORM: 20110121-W 10400164

AQUIFER PRu fECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V. EVAL UATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the app] ication:.
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes E No.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued, Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition
Reason
Look at Section IV, item 7
See Section IV Item 7. However, if the Central
Office does not think it is necessary to monitor
the process of reactions between injectant and
contaminants, I am not going to argue.
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons,
8. Signature of report preparers):
Signature of APS regional super
Date: + z I l
FORM: 20110121-WI0400164 6

AQUIFER PRu i'ECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF RE VIEW ITEMS
The site is an outsized gas station. Its large part is specifically for huge trucks. The contamination area is right
located in middle of a very long _pumping island. Traffic is so busy at the site and the area to be treated with
infection of ORC. Therefore. safety may be an issue that needs to be addressed before and during the infection.
FORM: 201 1012 l - W ] U4QD 1 b4

North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Division of Public Health • Epidemiology Section
Occupational & Environmental Epidemiology Branch
1912 Mail Service Center . Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-191?
Tel [phone]W • Fax [phone]
l Iichad F. Easley. Governor Carmen Hooker Odom, Secretanp
August S, 2005
MEMORANDUM
C
cr►
_
TO: Evan Kane
C)
_
Underground injection Control Program
o�
Aquifer Protection Section
—4
FROM: Luanne K. Williams, Pharm.D., ToxicologistA '��
Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Unit
=1
G-
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch
rn
co
n-
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
SUBJECT: Use of a Nan -Biological Product Oxygen Release Compound —Advanced (ORC-
AdvancedTm) by Regenesis to Enhance Biodegradation of Soil Contaminated with
Petroleum Compounds at LC Industries in Durham, North Carolina
i am writing in response to a request for a health risk evaluation regarding the use of use
of a non -biological product Oxygen Release Compound — Advanced ) by
Regenesis to enhance biodegradation of soil contaminated with petroleum compounds at LC
Industries in Durham, North Carolina. Based upon my review of the information submitted, I
offer the following health risk evaluation:
PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects or hazards reported to be associated with the chemicals proposed for use are
a: follows:
Exposure can cause irritation and burns to the skin, eyes, nose and throat
(Medical Management, Micromedex TOMES Plus System CD-ROM Database,
Volume 65, 2005)
2. if the products are released into the environment in a way that could result in a
suspension of fine solid or liquid particles (e.g., grinding, biending, vigorous shaking or
mixing), then it is imperative that proper personal protective equipment be used. The
application proem should be reviewed by an industrial hygienist to ensure that the most
appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
COI_omtLon: 5505 Six forks Road. ?n+ 19oor. Rtmim D1 0 Raleigh, N.0 '?.76M An Ec?ual Opportunity Employer

Persons working with this product should at least wear goggles or a face shield, gloves,
and protective clothing. Face and body protection should be Used for anticipated splashes
or sprays. Again, consult with an industrial hygienist to ensure proper protection.
4. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should never
be permitted in the application area during or immediately following application. Safety
controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery
systems are working properly.
5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent adverse reactions and
injuries.
6. Access to the area of application should be limited to the workers applying the product.
In order to minimize exposure to unprotected individuals, measures should be taken to
prevent access to the area of application.
7. According to the information submitted, the area is served by a public water supply.
However, a domestic water supply well is located approximately 2,000 feet from the site
along Slater Road. Also, an unnarned small creek is located approximately 1,000 feet
south of the site. The creek drains into an unnamed pond north of Airport Road. Efforts
should be made to prevent contamination of existing or future wells and nearby surface
waters that may be located near the application area.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions at [phone].
cc: Mr. Rick Stalling, LC Industries, 18 10 E. Main Street, Durham, NC 27703
Mr. Ed Mackey, Weston Solutions Inc., 4917 Waters Edge, Raleigh, NC 27606
Mr. Michael Ranck, NCDENR, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Mr. Gene Burke, Vironex, Inc., 530 McCormick Drive Suite A, Glen Burnie, MD 21061
Mr. Everett Poore, Nortel Networks, 3001 East Chapel Hill, RT P, NC 27705

RECEIVED I0ENRJ DMI
1l+FFR pIG!iTi 7"10'J fiFMION
AQ
OCT 12 ?011
From Science to Solutions—
SENT VIA FEaEx
October 5, 2011
Ms. Mindy Lepard
Guilford County Environmental Health
1203 Maple Street
Greensboro, NC 27405
Re: Groundwater Monitoring Report
1101 NC 61, Whitsett, Guilford County, NC
Greensboro Travel Center
Incident No. 30318
Injection Permit W10400164
Dear Ms. Lepard:
On behalf of TravelCenters of America (TA), SAIC Energy, Environment, & Infrastructure, LLC
(SAIC) is submitting this Groundwater Monitoring Report to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) for Corrective Action Plan (CAP) implementation
and Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) installation at the diesel dispenser pad of above -
referenced facility (Figure 1). The July 12, 2010 CAP approved ORC installation in wells
CSAMW-3 and DDMW-2 and required semi-annual sampling of the wells around the facility
diesel dispenser pad (CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, CSAMW-4, and DDMW-2) until the
groundwater meets DENR's 2L Standards. Semi-annual sampling was first conducted in
October 2010. The second sampling was delayed from April 2011 to July 2011, with DENR
permission, to order that an underground injection control (UIC) permit be issued for the ORC
and so the ORC affects could be evaluated. This report covers the period through July 14, 2011.
METHODS AND ❑BSERVATIONS
After receipt of the UIC permit, SAIL installed socks containing approximately 15 pounds ORC
each in wells CSAMW-3 and DDMW-2 on April 14, 2011. SAIL measured water levels (Table
1) and groundwater field parameters, pH, temperature, oxidation reduction potential (ORP),
dissolved oxygen (DO), and specific conductance (Table 2), in the dispenser pad wells prior to
ORC installation. SAIC measured water levels and field parameters again June 11, 2011 and
July 14, 2011.
On July 14, 2011, SAIL gauged the monitoring wells at the site, including those for the diesel
dispenser pad prior to sampling. No liquid -phase hydrocarbon (LPH) was measured or observed
on the groundwater in any monitoring well. The hydrologic gradient was south, consistent with
that reported previously (Figure 2).
SAIL Energy, Environment, & Infrastructure, LLC
6310 Allentown Boulevard I Harrisburg. PA 17112 1 tel: 7'17, 901, 8100 I www.saic.com

r
Ms- Mindy Lepard - 2 - October 5, 2011
Five monitoring wells (CSAMW-1, CSAMW-2, CSAMW-3, CSAMW-4, and DDMW-2) were
purged and sampled in accordance with ASTM Method D-4448. Groundwater samples were
collected, placed in laboratory -provided glassware, and preserved according to ASTM Method
D-3694. They were submitted to Accutest Laboratory for analysis of Massachusetts Department
of Environmental Protection (MADEP) volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) and extractable
petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) in accordance with EPA publication SW-846. Analytical results
are compared to historical results and 2L Standards on Table 3. Copies of laboratory reports are
included as Attachment A.
FINDINGS
The July 14, 2011 groundwater sample results at the diesel dispenser pad indicated a significant
reduction in hydrocarbon concentrations compared to the historical groundwater sampling
results. The groundwater at monitoring wells was non -detect for C9-C18 Aliphatics (adjusted)
and C9-C22 Aromatics (adjusted) at all wells except DDMW-2. Groundwater from DDMW-2
was less than the 2L Standards for C9-C 18 Aliphatics (adjusted), but exceeded the 2L Standards
for C9-C22 Aromatics (adjusted).
The introduction of ORC into DDMW-2 and CSAMW-3 boosted their DO concentrations by 2.1
milligrams per liter (mglL) and 8.5 mglL, respectively, over previous DO measurements. This
higher DO was available to support biodegradation of the hydrocarbons. Groundwater migration
rates are slow, and the downgradient wells indicate compliance with 2L Standards. These
conditions and the fact that surrounding receptors are hundreds of feet away and topographically
higher than the site indicates no potential of impact to these wells from the site.
Based on the conditions measured, which document a decreasing impact at groundwater at the
diesel dispenser pad, lead SAIL and TA to recommend continued semi-annual monitoring for
Incident No. 30318. The next scheduled semi-annual sampling will be in October, 2011,
Please contact the undersigned at [phone] should you have any questions or concerns.
Respectfully submitted,
SAIC ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, & INFRASTRUCTURE. UC.AL
...
829
4
Kent V. Littlefield, P.G.LOG
Enclosures se f••y Lill
cc: Emily Gloeckler, P.G. (TravelCenters of America} 14181Je4i„r.
Cindy H. Rintoul, L.G. (NCDENR)
David L. Goodrich, (NCDENR-Aquifer Protection Section)
FiECFiVrO I t_.;:PIR 1 OWU
AQUfF�R pPnT«T3�h! ScCT34ll
OCT 19 2011
SRtC Energy, Environment, & Infrastructure, LLC

FIGURES
SAIC Enemy, Environment, & Infrastructure, LLC

f
4F � ,
`. I�
r
r
Diesel Di
L15T System
1-1
I Note: The base map is from the U5G5 Gibsonville 7.5 min. quadrangle
Legend
- - - Surface Water
Property Boundary
Onsite Buildings N
r
Y",,_
nser Pad
0 250 500 1.000
Feet
TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA
GREENSBORO FACILITY
1101 N(L HIGHWAY 61, %VHITSLTT, NC
Site Location Map
Jr,un KBL oh"ked figure no-
d— ° ] (I ] u dxe Jazr
nh nn f Ic nn.
ti\-Y.Y\\ C\lC\ti!f-1 Y�
K:1G15_Data1TMVVhitsett, Nc1Pro}ects130813 - CAPT i g 1 -Topornap. rnxd
E"H"

w
yl[71-I6
1�GENI3
&UW-6 wwwamp. rni
— - S CSAMW—1 I.airfmiE W sm ►WSS"
WO "Wl wu
Mft %cwf, , WE
DO& V!
OM cuts owuslo IM
LAM SW l4RERElif SO4 83W
IXO?) IAFMX&Olt MAIUY]
99.66 FELATNEGROUNDOvATEP ELErATOPI
G ROU H DAATEF -MN TOU F
=AF4 YATCS A.OJ USTEO,
ii S--: IS ALIP RATCS JkDJU-TEO
wlil IR Pm

TABLES
SAIL Energy. Environment, & Infrastructure, LLC

TABLE
Groundwater Elevation and Product Thickness
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility 1.D.:0-0291S6 Incident dumber.: 30913
Well 1D
hate
Screened Interval (top of
screen to bottom of
screen b rest
Depth to Water-
Uncorrected [Feet]
Free Product
Thickness {feet)
Depth to Water-
Corrected
Cap afCasing
Elevation [feet)
Groundwater
5urrace Elevation
feet
3;18i2008
1
7.5
7,52
100-00
92A8
4/1/2009
0 •
0+
100.00
> 100,00
MW-4
4/29/2009
5.03
5,03
100,00
94.97
5/29/2009
7.21
T21
100.00
92.79
9/1/2009
10.93
10.93
100,00
89.07
12/22/2009
0+
-
10.93
100.00
>100.00
3/27/2009
4-14
2.84
2,84
92,24
89.40
4/28/2009
3.05
3.05
9124
89.19
MW-15
5/28/2009
3,53
3,53
9124
88.71
9/1/2009
5.37
5.37
92.24
86.87
17/22/2009
1.83
1.83
92.24
90Al
3/24/2009
1 n- ;1
24.80
24.80
94.18
69.38
3/31/2009
7.72
7,72
94.18
86,46
4/1/2009
7.69
7.69
94,18
86A9
4/28/2009
K50
8.50
94.18
85.68
CSAMW-1
5/28/2009
9.01
9.01
94.18
85.17
9/1/2009
9.82
9.82
94.18
84.36
12122/2009
6.87
6A7
94,18
87.31
10/412010
IU3
1U3
94.18
83.95
116/2011
11.00
11.00
94,18
83.18
4/14/2011
6,81
6,81
94,18
87,37
3/31/2009
60--fY
1&05
18.05
97,75
79.70
4/28/2009
44.15
44.15
97.75
53.60
5/28/2009
3.22
3,22
97,75
94.53
CSAMW-2
9/1/2009
19.06
19.06
97.75
78.69
12/22/2009
15.70
15.70
97.75
82.05
10/4/2010
16.44
16,44
97,75
81.31
l/612011
17.65
17.65
97.75
80.10
-4/14/2011
1 L52
11.52
97.75
86,23
3/31/2009
10-25
5.48
5.48
98.39
92.91
4/1/2409
2.79
-
2.79
98.39
95.60
4/28/2009
3.30
--
3.30
98,39
95.09
5/28/2009
3.18
--
3,18
98,39
9511
CSAMW-3
9/1/2009
9.88
-
9.88
98.39
88.51
12/22/2009
3.05
-
105
98.39
95,34
10)4i2010
7.57
T57
98.39
90.82
1/6i2011
10.51
10.51
98.39
87.88
4/14/201 1
5,12
5.12
98,39
93.27
3/31i2009
65-75
53,10
53.10
99.09
45,99
4/28/2009
3.56
3.56
99.09
95.53
5/28/2009
3.31
3,31
99.09
95.78
CSAMW-4
9/1/2009
12/22/2009
13,37
9.97
13.37
9.97
99.09
99,09
85.72
89.12
10/4/2010
1174
1174
99,09
95,35
1/6/2011
16.56
16.56
99.09
82.53
4/14/2011
15.15
15,15
99,09
83.94
10/3/2006
15.28-29.65
16.94
16.94
I01.22
94.28
3/31/2009
4.29
0. U �1
4.33
97.78
93.45
4/28/2009
5.54
5.54
97,78
92.24
5/28/2009
8.05
8.05
97.78
89.73
DDMW-2
91112009
10,43
10.43
97,79
87.35
12/22/2009
4.28
4.28
9T78
93.50
10/4/2010
9,56
9,56
97.78
88.22
1/6/21011
10.64
10,64
97.78
87-I4
4/14/2011
6115
6.65
1 97.78
1 91A3
NOTES:
1) ft bgs-feet below grade surface
2) Top of casing elevations based on a arbitraury datum of 100 feet.
3) Top of casing elevations measured on March 31. 2009.
3) 0+ indicates the well began flowing after the compression cap was removed.

Table 2
Groundwater Physical Parameters
TravelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility I.D.: 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30813
Location
Date
Temperature
°C
pH
Conductivity
Slcm
D.D.
mg/L
Redos
mV
CSAMW-1
4/1/2009
18.2
6.43
0.751
3.09
-114
10/5/2010
21.3
6.86
0.610
2.95
-20
7/14/2011
20.5
6.64
0.597
1.79
NA
CSAMW-2
4/1/2001
18.6
6.77
0.970
8.96
-239
1.01512010
19.5
693
1.100
1.86
-60
7/14/2011
20.2
6.69
1.280
2.66
NA
CSAMW-3
4/112009
17.6
6.69
3.79
3.47
-64
10/5/2010
20.1
6.44
1.22
3.99
-37
4/14/2011
20.2
6.54
0.44
4.11
-253
6/18/201 I
22.5
9,12
0.50
7.21
NA
7/14/2011
20.6
7.16
1.45
12.62
NA
CSAMW4
4/1/2009
18.7
7.27
0.903
6.84
-23
1015J2010
18.8
8.05
0.505
1.52
-170
7/14/2011
21.5
6.63
0.652
3.94
NA
MW4
4/1/2009
16A
7.05
0.381
4.79
-138
MW-1
3/27/2009
17.4
6.44
0.594
5.09
-109
I)DMW-2
9/2/2009
19.6
6.16
0.92
3.51
-29
12/23/2009
16.9
6.30
0.432
NM
-33
10/5/2010
19.6
6.60
0.624
12.05
-290
4/14/2011
17.99
6.54
1.05
1.73
-133
6/18/2011
22,77
6.14
0.091
6.37
NA
7/14/2011
20.63
6.95
1.01
3.87
NA
Notes:
1. IC -degrees Celsuis 6. MW4 was a flowing well at time of sampling,
2. SJcm- per centimeter 7. All wells were purged by hand bailing
3. mg/L-milligrams per liter 8. Total Dissolved Solids [TDS]
4. mV-millivolts 9. D.O.-Dissolved Oxygen
5. ft-feet 10. NM -Not measured

TABLE 3
Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
7YavelCenters of America
1101 NC Highway 61
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina
Facility 1.D.: 0-029186 Incident Number.: 30813
Arial�rical Melhoc
MADEP Volatile Petroleum Il drocarbons (VPI I)
MADEP Extractable Petroluum Il
drocarbons (EP11)
C9-C22 Aromatics
Adjusted
C9-C18 Aliphaties
Adjusted
Contaminant ufConcern ( I.
C5-C8 Aliphalies
x)
C9 C10
Aromatics c
C'4-C 12
Ali liaties a)
C 1 I-C.22
Aromatics (d)
C 19-C36
Ali phatics
C9-C 18 Aliphalies
h
Sample 1 D
Dale
Collected
Source Area
Incident Phase
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispemers
CSA
<9.7
¢ 1.1
7.1 J
110 J
<36
161
110,1
23 J
CSAMW-1
10/5/2010
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
NA
<2.9
NA
<90
NA
NA
<92.9
NA
7/14/2011
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<35
<35
<35
<130
<85
<67
<135
<67
4/1/2009
Diesel Dis nsers
USA
<9.7
< 1.1
19 J
130 J
49 J
8.7 J
130 J
28 J
CSAMW-2
10/5/2010
Diesel Dispensers
C :NA
NA
<2.9
NA
r90
NA
NA
¢92.9
NA
7/14/2011
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<35
<35
<35
<87
<56
<44
r 122
<44
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
173
520
580
1,300
1,200
3,900
11820
3,960
CSAMW-3
I01512010
Diesel Dis nsers
CSA
NA 1
9.9
NA
680
NA
NA
699
NA
7/14/2011
Diesel Dispensers
(",A
;
<35
<35
<87
<56
<44
<122
<44
CSAMW-4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
�9.7
<1 A
<6,3
140 J
50 J
<6.4
140 J
<12
101512010
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
NA
Q.9
NA
110 J
NA
NA
l l0 J
NA
7/14/2011
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<35
<35
<35
<87
<56
<44
<122
<44
MW4
4/1/2009
Diesel Dispensers
C5A
<9,7
29
15 J
130 J
<36
<6.4
159 J
<6A
MW-15
3/27/2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
<1.1
<63
86 J
<36
¢6,4
86 J
<12
10/3/2006
Diesel Dispensers
LSA
NR
530
880
8()0,000
1 000
6.400,000
806,530
6,400,530
9/2; 2009
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
100
210
360
<36
521
460
162
DDMW-2
12i22!2004)
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<9.7
50
400
1,600
700
2,800
I,650
3,150
101512010
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
NA
61
NA
230
NA
NA
291
NA
7/14/2011
Diesel Dispensers
CSA
<35
205
160
503
201
409
708
363
21- Standard ( L)
420
NA
NA
21 a
42,000
4,200
210
4,200
GCL( L1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NC 2B Standard ur EPA National Criteria (P /L)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Notes: (WI. -Gross Contamination Level
2L Standard=Noil li Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards (CiWQS:
Results reposed in pg11. & reporting limits are at the melhod deice Iion limit 1MDL
pgll: micrograms per liter
J-Estimated value hetwee n the reporting limit and M171.
NA -Not AppiicableNot AnalyxedlNnt Available
Groundwater standards taken from July 15, 2008 Guidelines for Assess meal and Corrective Aclion for UST Releases
Bold value indicates detections
Bold and shaded values indicate exceedancc of the Soil to Groundwater MSCC
EPA -Environmental Protection Agency
C9-1222 Aromatic (Adjusted)=c+d
C9-C 18 AIiphatics (Adjusted)---(a-c)+h
BR1: Below Reporting I.imii
NR-Not reported

ATTACHMENT A
Laboratory Reports
SAIC Energy. Environment, & Infrastnicture, LLC

e-H ardcopy 2.0
Automated Report
. Southeast
a,o.cC;uTEsT
L r, f] [] R A T❑ 1= I E S
Technical Report for
Travel Centers of America
SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Accutest Job Number: F84283
Sampling Date: 07/14/11
Report to:
Science Applications Int' l Corp
6310 Allentown Blvd
Harrisburg, PA 17112
[e-mail]
ATTN: Kent Littlefield
Total number of pages in report: 36
�H ACCOR
A� F4
x
fi�' I
Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements arry Behzadi, Ph.D.
of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Laboratory Director
and/or state specific certification programs as applicable.
Client Service contact: Muna Mohammed 407-425-6700
Certifications: FL (E83510), LA (03051), KS (EA0327). ]A (366), IL (200063), NC (573). NJ (FLO02), SC (96038001)
DoD ELAP (L,-A-El L2229), CA (04226CA), TX (T1O4704404), AK, AR, GA, KY, MA, NV, OK, UT, VA, WA, WI
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Accutest Laboratories.
Test results relate only to samples analyzed.
Southeast • 4405 Vineland Road - Suite C-15 • Orlando, FL 32811 • let: 407-425.67DO , fax: [phone] - http://www.accutest.com
1 of 36
Accutest Laboratories is the sole authority far authorizing edits or modifications to this �• C>-u-rES`f:
document. Unauthorized modification of this report is strictly prohibited. F84283 ••�,,

M
ACCLJ-T'EST
I. A H 0 R A Y (] g I F. S
October 4, 2011
Mr. Kent Littlefield
Science Applications Int'l Corp
6310 Allentown Blvd
Harrisburg, PA 17112
RE: Accutest job F84283 Reissue
Dear Mr. Littlefield,
The final report for job number F84283 has been edited to reflect requested corrections.
These edits have been incorporated into the revised report.
MIL lowered.
Accutest apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. Please feel free to contact
us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Accutest Laboratories, SE
Florida • 4405 Vineland Road i Suite C-15 •Orlando, FL 32811 4 tel: [phone] • tau: 447 425-0707 r htpp:hLs .accutest.canq
■i 2 of 36
aACCLJTE=—B'T.
F84283 `"'.-.-" '

Table of Contents
Section 1: Sample Summary.............................1....................................................................
Section2: Sample Results........................................................................................................
2.1: F84283-1: CSAMW-1..................................................................................................
2.2: F84283-2: CSAMW-2..................................................................................................
2.3: F84283-3: CSAMW-3..................................................................................................
2.4: F84283-4: CSAMW-4..................................................................................................
2.5: F84283-5: DDMW-2....................................................................................................
2.6: F84283-6: TRIP BLANK.............................................................................................
Section3: _Ilisc. Forms............................................................................................................
3.1: Chain of Custody...........................................................................................................
Section 4: GC Volatiles - QC data Summaries.....................................................................
4.1: Method Blank Summary........................................................................... .................... .
4.2: Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary ..............................................................
4.3: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary...........................................................
Section 5: Misc. Forms (.4ccutest Labs of lie►`= England, Inc.) ............................................
5.1: Chain of Custody...........................................................................................................
Section 6: GC Semi-volatiles - QC Data (Accutest Labs of New England, Inc.) ................
6.1: Method BIank Summary ................................................................................................
6.2: Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary..............................................................
6.3: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary ...........................................................
Sections:
4
5
6
8
10
12
14
16
17
18
20
21
24
27
30
31
33
34
35
36
an 3 of 36
0 A"MMu-rr=OM
F84283 .....,o„�.

t
Accutest Laboratories
Sample Summary
Travel Centers of America
Job No: F84283
SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Sample
Collected
Matrix
Client
Number
Date Time By
Received Code Type
Sample ID
F84283-1 07/ 14/ 11 11: 10 LA 07/ 15/ 11 AQ Ground Water CSAMW-1
F84283-2
07/ 14/ 11
15:20 LA
07/ 15/ 11
AQ
Ground Water
CSAMW-2
F84283-3
07/ 14/ 11
10:35 LA
07/ 15/ 11
AQ
Ground Water
CSAMW-3
F84283-4
07/ 14/ 11
15:05 LA
07/ 15/ I 1
AQ
Ground Water
CSAMW4
F84283-5
07/ 14/ 11
10:40 LA
07/ 15/ 11
AQ
Ground Water
DDMW-2
F84283-5
07/ 14/ 11
00:00 LA
07/ 15/ 1 1
AQ
Trip Blank Water
TRIP BLANK
1"i
4of36
� ACCI.._lT�ST,
FS4287

Section 2
Southeast
ACC�LJTEST
L A R❑ R A T❑ R I E S
Sample Results
Report of Analysis
on 5 of 36
w ACC UTEST.
F94283 ` ..........

F
Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMW-1
Lab Sample ID: F84283-1 Date Sampled: 07/14/11
,Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1. l Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH. TA -Greensboro: 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
j
Page 1 of I
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #i UV046334.D 1 07/27/11 CP nla n: a GUV2646
Run #2
Purge Volume
Run #1 5.0 ml
Run #2
MADEP VPH List
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL
MDL Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ug/l
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ug/i
C9- CIO Aromatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ug/l
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1
Run# 2
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
77%
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
82%
70-1300/a
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
= Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
E—, 6 of 36
ACCLJT��T
F8428]

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMW-1
Lab Sample 1D: F84283-1 Date Sampled: 07/14/11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15111
Method: MADEP EPH REV 1.1 SW846 3510C Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett. NC
N
Page i of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 a BJ429&D 1 07/26/11 AMA 07i2lil l M:GP25610 M:GBJ177
Run #2
Initial Volume Final Volume
Run #1 80.0 ml 2.0 ml
Run #2
Extractable TPHC Ranges
CAS No. Compound
Result
RL
MDL Units Q
C I I-C22 Aromatics (Unadj. )
ND
1300
130 ugll
C9-C 18 Aliphatics
ND
1300
67 uglt
C19-C36 Aliphatics
ND
1300
85 uglt
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries
Run# I
Run# 2
Limits
84-15-1
o-Terphenyl
80%
40-140%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
79%
40-140%
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooctadecane
56°/a
40-140%
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
55%
40-140%
[a] Analysis performed at Accutest Laboratories, Marlborough, MA.
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
J = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyze found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
ME 7 of 36
.AM C LJTEST.
F84283

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMW-2
Lab Sample I D: F84283-2 Date Sampled: 07/ 14/ 11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1.1 Percent Solids: Wa
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; i 101 NC Iiwy 61, Whitsett, NC
irs
Page 1 of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 UV0463131) 1 07/26/11 CP nla n/a GUV2645
Run #2
Purge Volume
Run #1 5.0 ml
Run #2
MADEP VPH List
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL
MDL units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
N❑
too
35 ugll
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ugll
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ugll
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1
Run# 2
Limits
460-004
BFB
79%
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
90%
70-130%
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
J = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank:
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
■■ 8 of 35
0 ACCtJTEt3T.
F9/263 •......"""

r
Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMW-2
Lab Sample ID: F84283-2 Date Sampled: 07/ 14/ 11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP EPH REV I.1 SWW 3510C Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro: 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
N
N
Page l of l
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run 41 $ B]4359.D 1 07127i11 AMA 07/21/11 M:OP25610 M:GBd179
Run #2
Initial Volume Final Volume
Run #1 120 mi 2.0 ml
Run #2
Extractable TPHC Ran -es
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL
iMDL Units Q
CI I-C22 Aromatics [Unadj,]
N❑
830
87 ug11
C9-C18 Aliphatics
ND
830
44 ugjl
C 19-C36 Aliphatics
ND
830
56 ugll
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1
Run# 2
Limits
84-15-1
o-Terphenyl
62%
40-140%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
78%
40-1409'6
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooetadecane
43%
40-140%
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
59%
40-140%
(a) Analysis performed at Accutest laboratories, Marlborough, MA,
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
= Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
a , 9of36
N ACCLl-rEST
F84283 ........ ......

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMW-3
Lab Sample ID: F84283-3 Date Sampled: 07/14/11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV I.1 Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
N
w
Page 1 of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 UV046314.D 1 07/26/11 CP Na nla GUV2645
Run #2
Purge Volume
Run #I 5.0 ml
Run #2
MADEP VPH List
CAS No.
Compound Result
RL
MDL Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.) ND
100
35 ugll
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.) ND
100
35 ugll
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.) N❑
100
35 ugll
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries Run# I
Run# 2
Limits
460-00-4
BFB 77%
70-130%
460-00-4
BF B 82%
70-130%
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
I = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
10of36
(♦ L.CCUTEzST.

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
w
Page 1 of 1
Client Sample 1D: CSAMW-3
Lab Sample ID: F84283-3 Date Sampled: 07/14/11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP EPH REV 1.1 SW846 3510C Percent Solids: Na
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, WhitseM NC
File 1D DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 a 6]4301. D 1 07126/ 11 AMA 07121/ 11 M:QP25610 M:GE J 177
Run #2
Initial Volume Final Volume
Run # l 120 nil 2.0 ml
Run #2
Extractable TPHC Ranges
CAS No. Compound Result RL MDL
CII-C92 Aromatics (Unadj.) ND 830 87
C9-C l8 Aliphatics ND 830 44
C I9-C36 Aliphatics ND 830 56
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 Run# 2
84-15-1 o-Terphenyl 6g% b
321-60-8 2-Fluorobiphenyl 81%
3386-33-2 1-Chlorooctadecane 48% b
580-13-2 2-Bromonaphthalene 67%
(a) Analysis performed at Accutest Laboratories, Marlborough, MA.
(b) Surrogate recovery manually corrected for double spiking.
Units Q
ugl l
ugll
ugJl
Limits
40-l40%
40-140%
40-140%
40-140%
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit J = Indicates an estimated value
RL = Reporting Limit B = Indicates analyze found in associated method blank
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
me 11 of 36
■.4CCUTES-F
F84283 `^•...... •,

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMWA
Lab Sample ID: F84283-4 Date Sampled: 071141 i l
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1. I Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: 'TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Wlvtsett, NC
sv
Page 1 of l
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
Run #1 UV046363.1) 1
07128/ 11
CP
nla
nla
GUV2647
Run #2 a UV046315.D 1
07/26/11
CP
n/a
nla
GUV2645
Purge Volume
Run #1 5.0 m1
Run #2 5.0 ml
MADIEP V PH List
CAS No. Compound
Result
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
N❑
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries
Rung 1
460-00-4 BFB
85%
460-00-4 BFB
91 %
(a) Confirmation run.
(b) Outside control limits.
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
RL
MDL [Units Q
too
35 ugll
too
35 ugll
100
35 ugll
Run# 2
Limits
68% b
70-130%
71%
70-130%
J = indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
■'7 12 of 36
M ACCUTEST-
F04283 ..4,..a,...

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: CSAMWA
Lab Sample ID: F84283-4 Date Sampled: 07/ 14/ 11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
!Method: MADEP EPH REV 1.1 SW846 3510C Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH; TA -Greensboro; l 101 NC Hwy 61. Whitsett, NC
Page l of I
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 a BJ4302. ❑ 1 07/26/ 11 AMA 07/21/ 11 M:OP25610 M:GBJ 177
Run #2
Initial Volume Final Volume
Run #1 120 ml 2.0 ml
Run Q
Extractable TPHC Ranges
CAS No. Compound Result RL MDL Units Q
Cl I-C22 Aromatics (Unadj.) N❑ 830 87 ug/1
C9-C 18 Aliphatics ND 830 44 ug/1
C 19-C36 Aliphatics ND 830 56 ugjl
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# I
Run# 2 Limits
84-15-1
o-Terphenyl
7t%
40-140%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
83%
40-140%
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooctadecane
49°/a
40-14011/6
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
67%
40-140%
(a) Analysis performed at Accutest Laboratories, Marlborough, MA.
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
J = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
�- 13 of 36
(* ACCIJTE�T

0
Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: DDMW-2
Lab Sample ID: F84283-5 Date Sampled: 07/14/11
Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1.1 Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
w
ire
Page I of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 UV046316.D 1 07/26/11 CP n./a nia GUV2645
Run #2
Purge Volume
Run # 1 5.0 ml
Run #2
MADEP VPH List
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL
MDL Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
100
35 ug11
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
160
100
35 ugll
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
205
100
35 ug11
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1
Run# 2
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
78%
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
83%
70-130%
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
I = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
M■ 14 of 36
ACCU-rEST.
F84283 "•�•, " ••

t 4
Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: DDMW-2
Lab Sample 1 D: F84283-5 Date Sampled: 07/ 14/ 11
?Matrix: AQ - Ground Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP EPH REV 1.1 SW846 3510C Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
N
LSI
Page 1 of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 a 13J4303.1) 1 07/26/1) AMA 07/21/11 M:OP25610 M:GBJ177
Run #2
Initial Volume Final Volume
Run #1 1210 nil 2.0 nil
Run #2
Ex -tractable TPHC Ranges
CAS No. Compound Result RL NIDL
CI I-C2? Aromatics (Unadj.) 503 830 87
C9-C 18 Aliphatics 408 830 44
C19-06 Aliphatics 201 830 56
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1 Run# 2
8445-1
o-Terphenyl
62%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
841/1a
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooetadecane
41%
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
65%
(a) Analysis performed at Accutest Laboratories, Marlborough, MA.
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = indicates value exceeds calibration range
Units Q
ugll J
ugli J
uwl J
Limits
40-140%
40-140%
40-140%
40-140%
J = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
■-• 15of36
E.4CCtJTEST.

Accutest Laboratories
Report of Analysis
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK
Lab Sample 1D: F84283-6 Date Sampled: 07/ 14/ 11
Matrix: AQ - Trip Blank Water Date Received: 07/ 15/ 11
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1. I Percent Solids: nla
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61. Whitsett, NC
N
Page 1 of 1
File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
Run #1 IN046317.D 1 07/27/11 CP nla nla GUV2645
Run #2
Purge Volume
Run #1 5.0 ml
Run #2
MADEP VPH List
CAS No.
Compound
Result
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
N❑
C9- C10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
ND
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Run# 1
460-00-4
BF B
7 l %
460-00-4
BF B
76%
ND = Not detected MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL = Reporting Limit
E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range
RL NIDL Units Q
100 35 ug", I
100 35 ugd
100 35 ug/l
Run# 2 Limits
70-130%
70-130%
] = Indicates an estimated value
B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank
N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound
16 of 36
� ACCt_JT�ST
F83:83 •••"•••"••••

Section 3
M Southea
N,gn.cC;u-rEE3
L A 9 Q R AT OR I E
Misc. Farms
Custody Documents and Other Forms
Includes the following where applicable:
• Certification Exceptions
• Certification Exceptions (NC)
• Chain of Custody
1�.
17 of 36
ACCIJTEST
F84283

a 4404 Vineland Rd. Suite C-15 Orlando Fi 32811 ❑1-1
A ccuresr
Accteresr Lab �� Fi.gls.l a Chace of Cvatody Izeown
gas Wcllearear NO
CYpry Ramk: s C
mku6�
owtls
�+
C
�
f�!¢71ee11d I�fil}�Ei6
AOOM� 0.750 Aartlwm BRO ftantadixp PA I1P. 1T112
■
e
i
y
PAd�elFsc 71'I.9p1 {9�y/r17-pp,-aloT
wr
Cy rtw�l L�hMMO
Enos kd�.k eW*�accan
Pere NartwMa. YA-GnMUGdv
Sie Hrn.w,.nro ' TA�G�e
SRa Lou" S, 01 fiC Mi.Y 61 1Nh4re NC
F84283: Chain of Custodv
Page 1 of 2
18 of 36
ACCLI"TEST.
F84283 �"•'�"•�'«"'

ACCCgUT��E5T LABORATORIES SAMPLE RECEIPT CONEIRMATION
ACCIPIESrSJOB NIJMBER:�a ➢� CLIENT: 5 �(- PROJECT: 1.
DATE/ITi,IERECEIVED: 11 00 : tp �& Y 24:OD) NDdBBROF COOLERS RECEIVED: 1
METHOD OF DELIVERY: LIPS ACCUTBST CO[1RIER Q GREYHOUND DELIVERY OTHER
AIRBILL NUMBERS: 1ol1 51 19 1��a
COQ ER INEOMUON
CUSTODY SCAT. NOT PRESENT OR NOT INTACT
CHAIN OF CUSTODY NOT RECEIVED [COC]
ANALYSIS REQUESTED IS UNCLEAR OR MISMQG
SAMPLE DATES OR TI RS UNCLEAR OR MISSING
ERATURE CRITERIA NOT MET
ll�RT ICE PRESENT
TRIP BLANK NFORMATIaN
TRIP BLANK PROVIDED
TRIP BLANK NOT PROVIDED
TRIP BLANK NOT ON COC
TRIP BLANK INTACT
TRIP BLANK NOT [NTACT
IVHD WATER TRIP BLANK
L_jRECEIVED SOIL TRIP BLANK
1 1 i mr. i 0
NUMBER OF ENCORES? 23-GRAM SRAM
NUMBER OF 5035 FIELD KITS 7
NUMBER OF LAB FILTERED METALS 7
TEAVEX&,1Rk-INFORMATIQI+i j
THERM ID 1 CORIL FACTOR
OBSERVED TEMPS:
CORRECTED TEMPS: i
SAMPLE INFO&MATIOH
SAMPLE LABELS PRESENT ON ALL BOTTLES
INCORRECT NUMBER OF CONTAINERS USED
SAMPLE RECEIVED IMPROPERLY PRESERVED
INSUFFICIENT VOLUME FOR ANALYSIS
ATESRIMES ON COC DO NOT MATCH SAMPLE LABEL
S ON COC DO NOT MATCH LABEL
VOC VIALS HAVE HEADSPACE (MACRO BUBBLES)
BOTTLES RECEIVED BUT ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
O BOTTLE RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS REQUESTED
UNCLFAR FILTERING OR COMPOSTIING OUi'RUCTIONS
SAMPLE CONTAINEWSj RECEIVED BROKEN
% SOLIDS JAR NOT RECEIVED
9 5035 FIELD SIT FROZEN WSTHIN 48 HOUR' S
S[AL'AL CHLORINE PRESENT
WFICARLE TO EYA 6W Ski IRS ORNORT13 CAROLINAt7RGAMC'JI
C-j
LW
9Lm0AARYOFCOMMENTS: Wc. rich i rCr,�+� vials lifP+?
all dR14-
F&
TEcEmc" SIGNATURFmATE k-:-T )-% Is ' \k REVIEWER SIGMA
NF 12110
receipt confirmation 122910.)ds
F84283: Chain of Custody
Page 2 of 2
�■ 19 of 36
ACCLJTE�T.

Section 4
Southeast
/N C; C; 7F F— E3 TT
L A B❑ R A T 0 R I E S
GC Volatlles
QC Data Summaries
Includes the following where applicable.
• Method Blank Summaries
• Blank Spike Summaries
• Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries
■ 20 of 36
F84283 ...Ong••

r 0 y t
Method dank Summary
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC IIwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Page l of I
Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
GUV26,45-MB UV046309, D 1 07/26/11 CP ttla n: a GUV2645
The QC reported here applies to the following samples:
F84283-2. F84283-3, F84283-5, F84283-6
Method: MADEP VPH REV 1.1
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL MDL
Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
too 35
ug/I
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
N❑
too 35
ugll
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
ND
100 35
ug/1
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
82%
70-130%
460-00-4
13FB
90%
70-130%
MM 29 of 36
ACCLJ-rE�T.
F54283 I..... ""

0 } 1
Method Blank Summary
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC I Iwy 61, Whitsen, NC
Page I of i
Sample File LD DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch
G1UV2646-MB UV046329.D 1 07/27/ 11 CP nla nla GUV2646
The QC reported here applies to the following samples:
F 84-83- I
Method: MADE P VP H REV 1. 1
CAS No. Compound Result RL MDL Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.) ND 100 35 ugll
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.) ND 100 35 ugll
C9- Cl0 Aromatics (Unadj.) ND 100 35 ug/l
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Limits
460-00-4 BFB 80% 70-130%
460-00-4 BEB 97% 70-130%
A
s
■ 22 of 36
E.4CC1--fTE=-ST.
F84283 •"•"

9 1 4 !
Method Blank Summary Page 1 of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA-Greensburo; 1101 NC Hwy 61. Whitsett, NC
Sample
File 1D aF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Hatch
Analytical Batch
GUV2647-MB
UV046371.D 1
07/28/11
CP
nla
Wa
GUV2647
The QC' reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADEP VPII REV 1. 1
F84283-4
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL MD1-
Units Q
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
100 35
ugll
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj. )
ND
100 35
ugll
C9- C10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
ND
100 35
ugll
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
73%
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
75%
70-130%
23 of 36
F84281

r0, a
Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary Page I of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett. NC
Sample
File 1D ❑F
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
GUV2645-BS
UV046298.D 1
07126/ 11
CP
nla
n/a
GUV2645
GUV2645-BSD
UV046299. D 1
07126/ 11
C P
nla
nla
GUV2645
The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADEP VPH REV 1. I
F84283-2, F84283-3, F84283-5, F84283-6
Spike
BSP
BSP
BSD
BSD
Limits
CAS No.
Compound
ugll
ugll
%
ugll
%
RPD Rec/RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
480
543
113
575
120
6 70-130125
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
640
714
112
728
114
2 70-130125
C9- C10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
240
247
103
250
104
1 70-130/25
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
BSP
BSD
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
94%
97%
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
103%
108%
70-130%
24 of 36
�.4CCLFT�ST
F84283

9
Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary Page i of I
,lob Number. F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
GUV2646-BS
UV046327. D 1
07/27/ 11
CP
nia
nla
GUV2646
GUV2646-BSI]
UV046328.D1
07/2711I
CP
nla
nla
GUV2646
The QC reported here applies to the follo► hig samples: Method: MADEP VPH REV 1. 1
F84283-1
Spike
BSP BSP
BSD
BSD
limits
CAS No.
Compound
ugll
ugll %
ugll
%
RPD Rec/RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
480
544 113
561
117
3 70-130125
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
640
709 111
721
113
2 70-130125
C9- C l 0 Aromatics (Unadj.)
240
244 102
245
102
0 70-130125
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
BSP
BSD
Limits
460-004
BFB
94%
98%
70-130°/a
460-00-4
BFB
102%
108%
70-130%
25 of 36
ACCL-j-r. T.
F84283 `"'O"'"••

. ; % a
Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary Page I of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPA-H: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, W'hitsett. NC
Sample
File 1D DF
Anaiyaed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
GUV2647-BS
UV046360.13 1
07/28/11
CP
n/a
Wa
GUV2647
GUV2647-BSD
UV046361.D 1
07/28/11
CP
n/a
nla
GUV2647
The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADE VPI I REV 1. 1
F84283-4
Spike
BSP
BSP
BSD
BSD
Limits
CAS No.
Compound
ugll
ug11
%
ugll
%
RPD
Rec/RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj. )
480
553
115
552
115
0
70-130/25
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj. )
640
745
116
725
113
3
70-130/25
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj.)
240
250
104
245
102
2
70-130125
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
BSP
BSD
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
96%
990/0
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
107%
107%
70-i30°Io
�i 26 of 36
ACCUT>=ST.

. , k .
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Page 1 of 1
.lob Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; i 101 NC llwy 61. Whitsett- NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep batch
Analytical Batch
F84283-4MS
UVO46321.D 1
07/27/ 11
CP
n/a
n/a
GUV2645
F84283-4MSD
UV046322.D 1
07/27/11
CP
n/a
n/a
GUV2645
F84283-4"
UV046315,D 1
07/26/11
CP
n/a
n/a
GUV2645
The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADEP VP11 REV 1, 1
F84283-2, F84283-3, F84283-5, F84283-6
F84283-4
Spike
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
CAS No. Compound
ugll Q
ugll
ugll
%
ugll
%
PPD
Ree/RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics i Unadj.)
ND
480
493
103
520
108
5
70-130150
C9- C 12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
640
634
99
666
104
5
70-130150
C9- C 10 Aromatics tUnadj.)
ND
240
219
91
227
95
4
70-130150
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries
MS
MSD
F84283-4
Limits
460-004 BFB
92%
92%
68%* b
70-130%
460-00-4 BFB
100°/a
102%
71%
70-130°1v
(a) Confirmation run.
(b) Outside control limits.
27 of 36
(♦ ACCiJTt<F�—T-
F84283

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Page i of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAI l: TA -Greensboro; 1 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch Analytical Batch
F84283-1MS
UV046352.D1
07/28/11
CP
nla
ri.'.l GUV264b
F84283-1 MSD
UV046353. D 1
07/28/11
CP
nla
nia GUV2646
F84283-1
UV046334.D1
07/27/11
CP
nla
nla GUV2646
The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADEP VPI1 REV 1.1
F84283-1
F84283-1
Spike
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
CAS No.
Compound
ug11 Q
ugll
ugll
%
ugll
% RPD
Rec/RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
ND
480
541
113
542
113 0
70-130/50
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj. )
N❑
640
693
108
708
111 2
70-130150
C9- C10 Aromatics (Unadj. )
N❑
240
248
103
254
106 2
70-130150
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
MS
MSD
F84283-1
Limits
460-00-4
BFB
94%
99%
77%
70-130%
460-004
BFB
103%
10800
82%
70-130%
28 of 36
accuTlsT
F84283 ...•�..•... ..•.• ,

. 0, •
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary
Job Number: F84283
Account: TRAVELSS Travel Centers of America
Project: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro: 1 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Sample
File ID DF
F84397-15MS
UV046390.D i
F84397-15MSD
UVO46391.D l
F84397-15
UVO46385.D 1
Analyzed
BY
Prep Date
07/29/ 11
CP
n/a
07/29J I I
CP
n/a
07/ 29/ 11
CP
n/a
Page I of I
Prep Batch Analytical Batch
n/a GUV2647
Na GUV2647
n.la GUV2647 !
The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: MADEP VPH REV 1.1
F84283-4
F84397-15
Spike
MS
NIS
MSD
MSD
Limits
CAS No.
Compound
ugll Q
ugll
ugll
%
ugll
%
RP❑
Rec1RPD
C5- C8 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
5I.5 1
480
602
115
587
112
3
70-130150
C9- C12 Aliphatics (Unadj.)
N❑
640
748
117
710
111
5
70-130150
C9- C 10 Aromatics (Unadj. )
ND
240
253
105
238
99
6
70-130/50
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
MS
,MSD
F84397-15
Limits
460-004
BFB
87%
86%
700/a
70-130%
460-00-4
BFB
95%
91%
740%
70-13011/a
29 of 36
E AC U-rE=-B-V
F84283 ......I--

a ,%
Section 5
Southeast
AGCUTE�T
L ABCFIATORIES
Misc. Forms
Custody Documents and Other Forms
(Accutest Labs of New England, Inc.)
Includes the following where applicable:
• Chain of Custody
J
■ 30 of 3s
� ACCUTEST.
F84283

. ,,
F84283: Chain of Custody
Page I of 2
Accutest Labs of New England, Inc.
■ 31 of 36
F84M `.....1-""

i, r
.h
ACCLJTEST
�,ioeAATo�rF.
Accutest Laborat
Accutest Job Numbar: F84283
CUSS: APSE
Dote [Time Received: 711912011
Delivery Method,
Project: — —
No. Coolers:
Cooler saurkv Y or N
Y or N
1 Cuslocy Seals Present: ® ❑
3. COG Present. 2 ❑
2 Custody Seals Intact ® ❑
4 Smpl DateslTime OK ® []
Cooler Temperature Y or
t Tamp criteria achieved [a
N
❑
2 Cooler temp venficabon. Inrared gun
3 Cooler media: Ice
(bag)
QqsffbLQ9WuLEm2ntsk Y or
N NIA
❑
1 Trip Blank present I cooler ❑
2. Trip Blank hated on COC.
❑
3. Samples pressived properly ®
❑
4 VOCs headsoace free ®
❑ U
Comments
A--X—i Lahrnuvriea
v 508 481 62M
ories Sample Receipt Summary
Immediate Client Services Action Required: No
Client Service Action Required at Login: NO
Alrbill Vs:
1 Sample lapels presert on t)ortles
n
❑
2 Container labeling complete
2
3. Sample container label I CCC agree
0
❑
$ample Irtftr y - Cenditjvp
Y
or N
1 $ample recvd wilhn HT
0
❑
2. All containers accounted for
6a
❑
3 cond-lion of sample
Intact__
Samplelntearlty- Instructions
1 Analysis requesled is clear
Y
®
or N MA
❑
2. Bottles received for unspecified tests
❑
12
3. Suft"rit Volume recvd W analysis
®
❑
4 Compositing instructions clear
❑
❑
5 FiHering rnslructions clear.
❑
❑ 8
195 Te lino" Cener VVMt. 6mg 0r
F 508481?1.
Vs r:Gcro�gr, MA
•rm. accuiesi rom
F84283: Chain of Custody
Pagel 2 of 2
■ 32 of 36
■ acCZ; u-rEsT

,
Section 6
. Southeast
E ACc;LJTE,u- -r
LAB0rtAT0RIES
GC Semi-volatiles
QC Data Summaries
(Accutest Labs of New England, Inc.)
Includes the following where applicable:
• Method Blank Summaries
• Blank Spike Summaries
• Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries
ME 33 of 36
M ACCLJTEST.
F84283^•e.�.•.r.

Method Blank Summary Page l of 1
Job Number: F84283
Account: AL.SE Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc.
Project: TRAVELSS: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro: l 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsent NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
GP25610-MB
BJ4256. D 1
07123/ 11
AL
07/21 / l 1
OP25610
G8J 176
The QC reported here applies to the fallowing samples: Method: MADEP EPH REV l.1
F84283-1, F84283-2, F84283-3, F84283-4, F84283-5
CAS No.
Compound
Result
RL MDL
Units Q
C l i -C22 Aromatics (Unadj, )
ND
100 too
ugll
C4-C18 Aliphatics
ND
too 10o
ugll
C 14-C36 Aliphatics
ND
too 100
ugll
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
Limits
84-15-1
o-Terphenyl
62%
40-140%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
75%
40-1401/0
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooetadecane
43%
40-140%
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
71%
40-140%
34 of 36
ACCIJT�ST.
F84283

r, IF
Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary Page I of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: ALSE Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc.
Project: TRAVELSS: SAICPAH: TA -Greensboro; 1 101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett, NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
OP2561 Q-BS
B]4257. D 1
07/23/ 11
AL
07/21/ 11
❑P25610
GBJ 176
OP25610-8SD
B]4258. D 1
07/23/ 11
AL
07/21/11
OP25610
GBJ 176
The QC reported here applies to the folloFring samples: Method: MADEP EPH REV l,1
F84283-1. F84283-2, F84283-3, F84283-4, F84283-5
Spike
BSP BSP
BSD BSD
Limits
CAS No. Compound ugll
ug/l %
ug/1 %
RPD
RccIRPD
CII-C22 Aromatics (Unadj.) 800
647 81 a
632 79 It
2
40-140125
C9-C18 Aliphatics 300
N❑ 27* b
ND 27* b
2
40-140/25
C19-C36 Aliphatics 400
2165 fib
271 68
2
40-14W25
CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries BSP
BSD
Limits
84-15-1 o-Terphenyl 70%
68%
40-140%
321-60-8 2-Fluorobiphenyl 73%
71%
40-140%
3386-33-2 1-Chlorooctadecane 40%
4I%
40-140%
580-13-2 2-Bromonaphthalene 71%
65%
40-140%
Sample Compound Col #1
Col #2
Breakthrough
Limit
OP25610-13S 2-Methy1naphthalene 17.9
0.51
2.8%
5.0
❑P25610-BS Naphthalene 19.8
1.2
5.7°/n*
5.0
OP25610-13SD 2-Methylnaphthalene 17.9
0.99
5.2%*
5.0
OP25610-BSD Naphthalene 19.9
2A
9.5%*
5.0
(a) Aromatic breakthrough (naphthalene and/or 2-methyinaphthalene)
exceeded 5% method
limit.
Results confirmed by
refractionation.
(b) Recovery of n-nonane was < 30% for laboratory
control sample.
on 35 of 36
ACCLJTEST.

A .a
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Page I of I
Job Number: F84283
Account: ALSE Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc,
Project: TRAVELSS: SAICPA14: TA -Greensboro; 1101 NC Hwy 61, Whitsett. NC
Sample
File ID DF
Analyzed
By
Prep Date
Prep Batch
Analytical Batch
❑P25610-MS
BJ4259, D 1
07/23/ 11
AL
07/21; 11
OP25610
GBJ 176
OP25610-MSD
BJ4260, D 1
07/23/ 11
AL
07/21/ 11
OP25610
GBJ 176
MC2029-1
BJ4261. D 1
07/23/ 11
AL
07/21/ 11
OP25610
GBJ 176
The QC reported here applies to the foll(minh samples: Method: MADEP EPH REV 1.1
F84283-1. F84283-2, F84283-3, F84283-4, F84283-5
MC2029-1
Spike
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
CAS No.
Compound
owl Q
ug/1
ug/l
%
ug/l
%
RPD
Rec/RPD
Cl l-C22 Aromatics (l.Inadj. )
ND
800
656
82
659
82
0
40-140/25
C9-C18 Aliphatics
ND
300
159
53
146
49
9
40-140/25
C19-06 Aliphatics
ND
400
314
79
286
72
9
40-140/25
CAS No.
Surrogate Recoveries
MS
MSD
MC2029-1
Limits
84-15-1
o-Terphenyl
68%
66%
63%
40-140%
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl
74%
73%
76%
40-140%
3386-33-2
1-Chlorooctadecane
26%* a
27%* 8
240/;* 8
40-140%
580-13-2
2-Bromonaphthalene
64°/6
70%
70%
40-1401%
(a) Outside control limits due to possible matrix interference. Confirmed by Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate.
IN 36 of 36
■accu-FF—s--r
F84287 °•