HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000394_CAROLINA BEACH MS4 AUDIT REPORT_20201218MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4)
PROGRAM AUDIT REPORT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCS000394
Carolina Beach, North Carolina
1121 N Lake Park Blvd.
Audit Date: December 2, 2020
Report Date: December 18, 2020
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources Stormwater Program
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th floor
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
(This page intentionally left blank)
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AuditDetails..................................................................................................................................................1
PermitteeInformation..................................................................................................................................2
List of Supporting Documents.......................................................................................................................3
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment...........................................................................4
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)........................................................................................8
Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls......................................................................................................11
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations.................................................16
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1.............................................................................................19
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1......................................................................................................21
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1............................................23
Appendix A: Supporting Documents
DISCLAIMER
This audit consists of an evaluation of program compliance with the issued permit and implementation of
the approved Stormwater Management Plan. This audit report does not include a review of all program
components, and program deficiencies in addition to those noted may be present. The permittee is
required to assess program progress and permit compliance, and to implement the approved Stormwater
Management Plan in accordance with the issued permit.
NCS000394 Carolina Beach MS4 Audit 20201202
This page intentionally left blank
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202
Audit Details
Audit ID Number:
Audit Date(s):
NCS000394_Carolina Beach M54 Audit 20201202
December 2, 2020
Minimum Control Measures Evaluated:
® Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
❑ Public Education & Outreach
❑ Public Involvement & Participation
M Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination
❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls- No delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program
❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls- Delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program
® Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
® Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
❑ Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
Field Site Visits:
® Municipal Facilities. Number visited: 1
® MS4 Outfalls. Number visited: 1
❑ Construction Sites. Number visited: Choose an item.
® Post -Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls. Number visited:1
❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item.
❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item.
Inspector(s) Conducting Audit
Name, Title
AMankgIon
Alaina Morman, Environmental Specialist
DEQ DEMLR
Audit ReportAuthor:
Date:
^�,�
Signature l l X/A Aw r / "l o-r � AilA
�1 O
fa -
NC5000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 1 of 25
Permittee Information
MS4 Permittee Name:
Town of Carolina Beach
Permit Effective Date:
February 20, 2017
Permit Expiration Date:
February 19, 2022
Mailing Address: 1121 N Lake Park Blvd.
Carolina Beach, North Carolina 28428
Date of last M54Inspection/Audit:
April 12, 2011
Co-permittee(s), if applicable:
N/A
Permit Owner of Record:
Bruce Oakley, Town Manager
Primary M54 Representatives Participating in Audit
Name, Title
Organization
Brian Stanberry, Public Works Director
Town of Carolina Beach
Ben Meister, Project Manager
Town of Carolina Beach
Ed Parvin, Assistant Town Manager
Town of Carolina Beach
Scott Weber, Stormwater Construction
Supervisor
Town of Carolina Beach
Mark Dudenhaver, Utility Construction
Review Technician
Town of Carolina Beach
Gigi Baggarley, GIS Administrator
Town of Carolina Beach
M54 Receiving Waters
Waterbodv
Classification
Impairments
Carolina Beach Yacht Basin
SB
Cape Fear River
Sc
Atlantic Ocean
(Discharge option only in emergency
situations)
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 2 of 25
List of Supporting Documents
Item
Number
Document Title
When Provided
(Prior to/During/After)
01
Stormwater Map
Prior
02
Public Works Department Flow Chart
Prior
03
Ordinance 17-1054: Stormwater Management Ordinance
Prior
04
Municipal SCM Operation and Maintenance Plan
Prior
05
MS4 Operation and Maintenance Plan
Prior
06
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program Plan
Prior
07
Nine Elements Watershed Restoration Plan - DRAFT
Prior
O8
Carolina Beach 2020 Annual Report SWMPA
Prior
09
Current Fee Invoice Status
Prior
10
Weekly Updates report to Town Council (11/16/20 — 1120/20)
During
11
Various BMP Inspection Reports
During
12
Street Sweeper Logs
During
13
Vactor Truck Logs
During
14
Inventory of Privately Owned SCMs
After
15
SCM 0&M Agreement
After
16
Immediate Corrective Actions Needed Letter
After
17
Maintenance Log for Municipally Owned Wet Ponds
After
18
Wet Pond Maintenance Contract with Dragonfly Pond Works
During
19
Cityworks— DemonstratedOnsite
During
NCS000394—Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 3 of 25
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
Staff Interviewed:
Brian Stanberry, Ben Meister, Ed Parvin, and Scott Weber
(Name, Title, Role)
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status
supporting
Doc No.
IIA.1
The permittee maintained adequate funding and staffing to implement and manage
Staffing and
the provisions of the Stormwater Plan and meet all requirements of the permit.
yes
08
Funding
The Stormwater Plan identifies a specific position(s) responsible for the overall
coordination, implementation, and revision to the Plan.
NO
Responsibilities for all components of the Stormwater Plan are documented and
position(s) assignments provided.
No
--
The permittee is current on payment of invoiced administering and compliance
monitoring fees (see stormwater e-payments on DEMLR MS4 web page).
yes
09
Comments
The stormwater program is funded through the enterprise fund, which also supports water and sanitary sewer. The enterprise fund
is self-sustaining through a monthly fee residents pay. This fund has been in existence for more than 10 years.
The town does not have a recent Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). There is a SWMP in Laserfiche, but the Assistant Town
Manager said it was from around 2009. The town has restructured three times since the 2009 SWMP was drafted and the SWMP
has not been maintained.
As part of the initial documentation request, the town provided a Public Works Department flow chart that highlights which staff
work on stormwater-related objectives. There are currently 6 full-time positions in the Stormwater Division. There is also a
technician that reviews all construction/E&SC plans submitted through the town, but this position is not housed in the Stormwater
Division. The Stormwater Division staff and the construction plan review technician are overseen by Brian Stanberry, the Public
Works Director. Staff positions are not explicitly tied to components of the SWMP because there is no current SWMP.
II.A.2 Stormwater
The permittee evaluated the performance and effectiveness of the program
Plan
components at least annually.
Partial
08,10
Implementation
and Evaluation
If yes, the permittee used the results of the evaluation to modify the program
components as necessary to accomplish the intent of the Stormwater Program.
Partial
--
Did the permitted MS4 discharges cause or contribute to non -attainment of an
applicable water quality standard?
No
If yes, did the permittee expand or better tailor its BMPs accordingly to address
Not
the non -attainment?
Appllrable
—
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 4 of 25
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
Comments
Stormwater activities are tracked and reported weekly to the Town Council. Additionally, stormwater activities are reviewed each
year as part of the budget process. The town also submitted a 2020 annual report SWMPA.
Stormwater staff also undergo annual employee assessments which provide the opportunity to talk about what they have done and
what they think could be done better.
II.A.3
Keeping the
The permittee kept the Stormwater Plan up to date.
No
--
Stormwater Plan
Up to Date
The permittee notified DEMLR of any updates to the Stormwater Plan.
Not
Applicable
—
Comments
The latest SWMP on file is from around 2009.
II.A.4 Availability
The permittee kept an up-to-date version of its Stormwater Plan available to the
of the Stormwater
Division and the public online.
No
Plan
The online materials included ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, or a list
identifying the ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, providing the legal
Yes
---
authority necessary to implement and enforce the requirements of the permit.
Comments
The town's stormwater-related ordinances are available online via Municode:
https://library.municode.com/nc/carolina_beach/ordinances/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=838632
https://Iibrary.municode.com/nc/carolina_ beach/munidocs/mun idocs?nodeld=2909cb4469297
II.A.3 & II.A.5
Stormwater Plan
Did DEMLR require a modification to the Stormwater Plan?
No
---
Modifications
If yes, did the permittee complete the modifications in accordance with the
Not
established deadline?
Applicable
Comments
II.A.6 Sharing
Responsibility
Are any control measures implemented by an entity other than the permittee?
Yes
---
If yes, is there a written agreement in place?
Not
Applicable
Comments
The state sediment program does E&SC plan reviews and approvals and inspects construction site runoff controls for projects
disturbing an acre or more. Separately, the town requires any disturbance of 5,000 square feet or more to submit a drainage plan
and obtain a fill/grade/clear permit. A silt fence requirement is included in the fill/grade/clear permit. Permits are issued through
Cityworks.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 5 of 25
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
1IA.7
The permittee maintained written procedures for implementing the six minimum
04, 05,
Written
control measures.
Partial
06
Procedures
Written procedures identified specific action steps, schedules, resources and
responsibilities for implementing the six minimum measures.
Partial
04,05
Comments
The town submitted an IDDE Program Plan, MS4 0&M Plan, and Municipal SCM 0&M Plan, but those plans do not, in many cases,
identify specific action steps, schedules, resources, and responsibilities for implementation. The audit did not include a review of
Public Education and Outreach, Public Involvement and Participation, or Construction Site Runoff Controls, so written procedures
for those MCMs were not requested.
III. A
The permittee maintained documentation of all program components including, but
Program
not limited to, inspections, maintenance activities, educational programs,
Partial
11,12,
Documentation
implementation of BMPs, enforcement actions etc., on file for a period of five years.
13
Comments
The town has been using Cityworks to document and track various stormwater-related functions for 3 years, but is still working on
implementing the software to its fullest potential. Many stormwater maintenance activities are tracked on paper logs and
inspection reports, but there isn't documentation of public education and outreach efforts.
111.13
The permittee submitted annual reports to the Department within twelve months
Annual Report
from the effective date of the permit.
No
Submittal
The permittee submitted subsequent annual reports every twelve months from the
scheduled date of the first annual report submittal.
partial
08
The Annual Reports included appropriate information to accurately describe the progress, status, and results
of the permittee's Stormwater Plan, including, but not limited the following:
1. A detailed description of the status of implementation of the Stormwater Plan
as a whole. This will include information on development and implementation
of each major component of the Stormwater Plan for the past year and
No
—
schedules and plans for the year following each report.
2. An adequate description and justification of any proposed changes to the
Stormwater Plan. This will include descriptions and supporting information for
the proposed changes and how these changes will impact the Stormwater
No
---
Plan (results, effectiveness, implementation schedule, etc.).
3. Documentation of any necessary changes to programs or practices for
assessment of management measures implemented through the Stormwater
No
---
Plan.
4. A summary of data accumulated as part of the Stormwater Plan throughout
the year along with an assessment of what the data indicates in light of the
No
—
Stormwater Plan.
5. An assessment of compliance with the permit, information on the
establishment of appropriate legal authorities, inspections, and enforcement
No
—
actions.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 6 of 25
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
Comments
The town does not have a current Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP); therefore, there was no reporting on the SWMP that
could have been done. The town did submit a Stormwater Management Program Assessment (SWMPA) for 2020, but did not
submit a SWMPA, or any other type of annual report, for 2017, 2018, or 2019.
IV.B
Annual Reporting
The Annual Reports document the following:
1. A summary of past year activities, including where applicable, specific
Partial
08
quantities achieved and summaries of enforcement actions.
2. A description of the effectiveness of each program component.
Partial
08
3. Planned activities and changes for the next reporting period, for each
Partial
08
program component or activity.
4. Fiscal analysis.
Partial
08
Comments
Per Part IV.B.3 of the permit, completion and submission of the 2020 SWMPA through BIMS satisfies the annual reporting
requirement. No SWMPA, or other type of annual report, was submitted for 2017, 2018, or 2019.
Additional
Comments:
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 7 of 25
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
Staff Interviewed:
Brian Stanberry, Ben Meister, and Scott Weber
(Name, Title,
Role)
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status
Supporting
Doc No.
II.D.2.a
IDDE Program
The permittee maintained a written IDDE Program.
Partial
06
If yes, the written program includes provisions for program assessment and
evaluation and integrating program.
No
---
Comments
The town has a written IDDE Program Plan, but it is not as detailed as it needs to be. Program plans are supposed to detail who is
responsible for doing what and when. The IDDE Program Plan provided does not start to address those details until page 4 (out of 4
pages) and even then, much of the information provided is vague. Additionally, the plan is not dated or signed.
The permittee maintained an IDDE ordinance or other regulatory mechanism(s) that
II.D.2.b
provides the legal authority to prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the MS4.
yes
Legal Authorities
If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the corporate limits of the permittee.
Yes
—
Comments
The IDDE portion of the ordinance is found in Article IX of Ordinance No.17-1054, which can be accessed through Municode at the
following address:
https:Hlibrary.municode.com/nc/carolina_beach/ordinances/code of ordinances?nodeld=838632
II.D.2.c
Storm Sewer
The permittee maintained a current map showing major outfalls* and receiving
System Map
streams.
Yes
Ol
Comments
'Major outfalls are discharges from > 36" diameter pipes or drainage areas of > 50 acres. In areas zoned for industrial activity, major outfolls
are > 12" or drainage area > 1 acres.
II.D.2.d
Dr Weather Flow
The permittee maintained a program for conducting dry weather flow field
y
observations in accordance with written procedures.
Partial
06,11
Program
Comments
The IDDE Program Plan briefly touches on how dry weather screening is to be handled.
The town inspects outfalls with backflow prevention devices quarterly, at least, but there is no documented set schedule for
conducting dry weather flow field observations. It is also important to note that much of the stormwater system is underwater
multiple times a day.
11.12.2.e
Invetigation
The permittee maintained written procedures for conducting investigations of
Procedures
identified illicit discharges.
Nos
--
NC5000394 Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 8 of 25
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
Comments
II.D.2.f
For each case of an illicit discharge or potential illicit discharge, the permittee documented and tracked the
Track and
following:
Document
Investigations
1. The dates) the illicit discharge was observed
No
---
2. The results of the investigation
No
---
3. Any follow-up of the investigation
No
---
4. The date the investigation was closed
No
--
Comments
At this point, illicit discharges would only be documented through personal notes, unless the Vactor truck was involved and then
that would be documented on the Vactor Log.
II.D.2.a Employee
The permittee implemented and documented a training program for appropriate
Training
municipal staff who, as part of their normal job responsibilities, may come into
No
---
contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection.
Comments
There is no formal IDDE training program for municipal staff. Stormwater Division staff receive information and guidance through
twice daily informal meetings.
II.D.2.h
The permittee informed public employees of hazards associated with illegal
Public Education
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
No
---
The permittee informed businesses of hazards associated with illegal discharges and
improper disposal of waste.
No
---
The permittee informed the general public of hazards associated with illegal
No
--
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
Comments
The town sends out announcements through social media, predominantly Facebook, when the New Hanover County HazWagon is
coming so that residents may dispose of household hazardous waste.
NCS000394 Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 9 of 25
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
II.D.2.i
The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for the
Public Reporting
public to report illicit discharges.
Partial
---
Mechanism
The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for staff
to report illicit discharges.
partial
The permittee established and implemented response procedures for citizen
requests/reports.
Partial
--
Comments
The public can report illicit discharges through the "Submit a Service Request" portal on the town's website or by calling town staff.
The website portal emails town staff who can generate a service request. The website portal does not communicate directly with
Cityworks, so service requests are not automatically generated. Service requests can then be tracked by the public online.
Internally, if town staff discover an issue, they can document it using Cityworks or call the Stormwater Supervisor, who would
ideally document the issue in Cityworks and generate a work order.
II.D.2.i
The permittee implemented a mechanism to track the issuance of notices of violation
Enforcement
and enforcement actions administered by the permittee.
Partial
---
If yes, the mechanism includes the ability to identify chronic violators for
initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance.
partial
--
Comments
The town said IDDE violations are code violations, so the Code Enforcement Officer (in the Planning and Development Department)
would be referred anything that gets severe enough. Currently, the only record of such a referral would be an email sent from the
Public Works Director to the Code Enforcement Officer. This information would get transferred into Cityworks, which does have the
ability to track violations, at some point in the process.
Additional
There is no SOP within the IDDE Program Plan for issuing and tracking violation notices and enforcement
Comments:
actions. Additionally, the Program Plan does not say who is responsible for issuing such documentation and
when. It is also unclear what the compliance and enforcement escalation process is (i.e. when does a violation
become sever enough that it gets transferred to the Code Enforcement Officer?).
NCS000394—Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 10 of 25
Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
Staff Interviewed:
(Name, Title, Role)
Brian Stanberry, Mark Dudenhaver, and Gigi Baggarley
Implementation (check all that apply):
® The permittee implements the components of this minimum measure.
❑ The permittee relies upon another entity to implement the components of this minimum measure:
❑ The permittee implements the following deemed -compliant program(s), which meet NPDES MS4 post -construction
requirements for the areas where implemented and in compliance with the specific program requirements as provided in 15A
NCAC and noted below (Complete Session Low 2006-246 section below):
❑ Water Supply Watershed I (WS-1) —15A NCAC 2B .0212
❑ Water Supply Watershed 11 (WS-11) —15A NCAC 213.0214
❑ Water Supply Watershed III (WS-III) —15A NCAC 2B .0215
❑ Water Supply Watershed IV (WS-IV)-15A NCAC 28.0216
❑ Freshwater High Quality Waters (HQW) —15A NCAC 2H .1006
❑ Freshwater Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) —15A NCAC 2H .1007
❑ Neuse River Basin Nutrient Sensitive (NSW) Management Strategy-15A NCAC 2B .0235
❑ Tar -Pamlico River Basin Nutrient Sensitive (NSW) Management Strategy —15A NCAC 2B .0255
❑ Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient Management Strategy-15A NCAC 213.0251
❑ Universal Stormwater Management Program —15A NCAC 2H .1020
Ordinance(s) (check all that apply):
The permittee utilizes the following ordinances and/or regulatory authority to fulfill post construction minimum measure program
requirements throughout the MS4 permitted area (check all that apply):
❑ DEQ model ordinance
® M54 designed post -construction practices that meet or exceed 15A NCAC 02H .1000.
❑ DEQ approved comprehensive watershed plan
❑ DEQ approved ordinance for a deemed -compliant Program (see list above)
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status
Supporting
Oo< No.
II.F.2.a
The permittee maintained an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism designed
Legal Authority
to meet the objectives of the Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls Stormwater
Yes
03
Management Program.
If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the jurisdictional area of the
permittee.
Yes
03
The permittee has the authority to review designs and proposals for new
development and redevelopment to determine whether adequate stormwater
Yes
03
control measures will be installed, implemented, and maintained.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 11 of 25
Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
The permittee has the authority to request information such as stormwater plans,
inspection reports, monitoring results, and other information deemed necessary to
evaluate compliance with the Post -Construction Stormwater Management
Yes
03
Program.
The permittee has the authority to enter private property for the purpose of
inspecting at reasonable times any facilities, equipment, practices, or operations
Yes
03
related to stormwater discharges.
Comments
II.F.2.b
Stormwater Control
The permittee utilizes strategies which include SCMs appropriate for the MS4.
Yes
03
Measures (SCMs)
SCMs comply with 1SA NCAC 02H .1000.
Yes
03
Comments
The town's ordinance references the state's BMP manual in Sec. 32-3.
II.F.2.c
The permittee conducted site plan reviews of all new development and
Plan Reviews
redeveloped sites that disturb greater than or equal to one acre (including sites
that disturb less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of
Yes
03
development or sale).
If yes, the site plan reviews addressed how the project applicant meets the
performance standards.
yes
03
If yes, the site plan reviews addressed how the project will ensure long-term
maintenance.
Yes
03
Comments
The Utility Construction Review Technician reviews the plans originally and then goes out to inspect once the SCM has been
installed and has to sign off in order for the project to get a Certificate of Occupancy (CO). As -built plans are required to be signed
and submitted upon completion of the SCM.
II.F.2.d
The permittee maintained an inventory of projects with post -construction
Inventory of Projects
structural stormwater control measures installed and implemented at new
Yes
14,19
development and redeveloped sites.
The inventory included both public and private sector sites located within the
permittee's corporate limits that are covered by its post -construction ordinance
Yes
14,19
requirements.
Comments
Town -owned SCMs were viewed during the audit via Cityworks.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 12 of 25
Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
II.F.2.e
The permittee provided mechanisms such as recorded deed restrictions and
Deed Restrictions
protective covenants that ensure development activities will maintain the project
Yes
03
and Protective
consistent with approved plans.
Covenants
Comments
The town requires deed restrictions and access easements.
II.F2.f
The permittee implemented or required an operation and maintenance plan for
Yes
03,25
Mechanism to
the long-term operation of the SCMs required by the program.
Require Long-term
operation and
The operation and maintenance plan required the owner of each SCM to perform
Maintenance
and maintain a record of annual inspections of each SCM.
Yes
03
Annual inspection of permitted structural SCMs are required to be performed by a
Yes
03
qualified professional.
Comments
II.F.2.g
The permittee developed and implemented a written inspection program for SCMs
Partial
04
Inspections of
installed pursuant to the post -construction program.
Structural
Stormwater Control
Measures
The permittee documented and maintained records of inspections.
Partial
11,17
The permittee documented and maintained records of enforcement actions.
Partial
16
Comments
The town has a Municipal SCM Operation and Maintenance Plan which does list inspection frequencies for different SCMs and
BMPs; however, the plan does not say who is responsible for doing each type of inspection or how the inspections are to be
recorded. Also, the plan is not signed or dated. The town contracts with Dragonfly Pond Works to service the town -owned wet
ponds.
There is no inspection program for privately owned SCMs. Problems with privately owned SCMs usually surface when the town is
investigating flooding complaints.
If town staff discover a problem, they first approach the SCM owner and have a discussion about what needs to be fixed. If the
owner fails to take any action to correct the problem, the town then sends a letter and the action is recorded in Cityworks.
II.F.2.h
Educational
The permittee made available through paper or electronic means, ordinances,
Materials and
post -construction requirements, design standards checklists, and other materials
Partial
---
Training for
appropriate for developers.
Developers
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 13 of 25
Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
Comments
The town is using the state's SCM manual, but there is no link to it on the website.
It was explained that the Utility Construction Review Technician and Director of Public Works meet with developers on site and talk
through requirements and concerns. They also directly email developers with the required forms and any additional information
that may be needed. Since the town only encompasses 2.5 square miles, there is no development going on that town staff are not
aware of.
II.F.2.i Enforcement
The permittee tracked the issuance of notices of violation and enforcement
actions.
Yes
19
If yes, the tracking mechanism included the ability to identify chronic violators
for initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance.
Yes
19
Comments
Cityworks tracks violation notices and penalties. This capability was demonstrated during the audit.
II.F.3.b
The permittee fully complies with post construction program requirements on its
New Development
own publicly funded construction projects.
Yes
Comments
Publicly funded projects are permitted through the state.
II.F3.c
Does the MS4 have areas draining to Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) pursuant to
Not
Nutrient Sensitive
15A NCAC 02H .0150?
Applicable
Waters
If yes, does the permittee use SCMs that reduce nutrient loading in order to
Not
meet local program requirements.
Applicable
If yes, does the permittee also still incorporate the stormwater controls
Not
required for the project's density level.
Applicable
-"-
If yes, does the permittee also require documentation where it is not feasible to
Not
use SCMs that reduce nutrient loading.
Applicable
Comments
II.F.3.d
The permittee ensured that the design volumes of SCMs take into account the
Design Volume
runoff at build out from all surfaces draining to the system.
Yes
03
Where "streets" convey stormwater, the permittee designed SCMs to be sized to
treat and control stormwater runoff from all surfaces draining to the SCM including
Yes
03
streets, driveways, and other impervious surfaces.
Comments
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 14 of 25
I Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls I
Comments:
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 15 of 25
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
Staff Interviewed:
Brian Stanberry, Ben Meister, and Scott Weber
(Name, Title, Role)
Permit citation
Program Requirement Status Supporting
Doc No.
II.G.2.a
The permittee maintained a current inventory of facilities and operations owned
Facility Inventory
and operated by the permittee with the potential for generating polluted Yes
stormwater runoff.
Comments
The following facilities and operations have the potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff: the Wastewater Treatment
Plant, the Operations Warehouse, the Fire Department, and the Bridge Barrier Road facility.
II.G.2.b
The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally
Operation and
owned and operated facilities with the potential for generating polluted
Partial
05
Maintenance (O&M)
stormwater runoff.
for Facilities
If yes, the 0&M program specifies the frequency of inspections.
Partial
05
If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of routine maintenance
requirements.
partial
D5
If yes, the permittee evaluated the O&M program annually and updated it as
necessary.
No
---
Comments
The town has an MS4 Operation and Maintenance Plan, however it is unclear when it was developed because it is not signed or
dated. The plan addresses maintenance of stormwater-related infrastructure but not municipally owned and operated facilities.
The overall critique is that the plan needs to be more detailed.
II.G.2.c
Spill Response
The permittee had written spill response procedures for municipal operations.
No
--
Procedures
Comments
II.G.2.d Streets,
The permittee evaluated existing and new BMPs that reduce polluted stormwater
Roads, and Public
runoff from municipally -owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within its
Yes
10
Parking Lots
corporate limits annually.
Maintenance
If yes, the permittee evaluated the effectiveness of existing and new BMPs
11,12,
based on cost and the estimated quantity of pollutants removed.
Yes
13
Comments
Stormwater activities are tracked and reported weekly to the Town Council. Additionally, stormwater activities are reviewed each
year as part of the budget process.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 16 of 25
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
II.G.2.f
The permittee maintained and implemented an 0&M program for the stormwater
O&M for Catch
sewer system including catch basins and conveyance systems that it owns and
Yes
05
Basins and
Conveyance systems
maintains.
Comments
II.G.2.d
The permittee maintained a current inventory of municipally -owned or operated
Structural
structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with the permittee's post-
Yes
---
Stormwater Controls
construction ordinance.
Comments
Town -owned SCMs were viewed during the audit via Cityworks.
II.G.2.e
The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally -
O&M for Structural
owned or maintained structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with
Yes
04
stormwater Controls
the permittee's post -construction ordinance. If yes, then:
The C&M program specified the frequency of inspections and routine
Yes
04
maintenance requirements.
The permittee documented inspections of all municipally -owned or maintained
Yes
11,17
structural stormwater controls.
The permittee inspected all municipally -owned or maintained structural
Yes
stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee.
The permittee maintained all municipally -owned or maintained structural
stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee.
Yes
---
The permittee documented maintenance of all municipally -owned or
maintained structural stormwater controls.
Yes
11,17
Comments
II.G.2.f
The permittee ensured municipal employees are properly trained in pesticide,
Not
Pesticide, Herbicide
herbicide and fertilizer application management.
Applicable
_
and Fertilizer
Application
The permittee ensured contractors are properly trained in pesticide, herbicide and
Management
g
fertilizer application management.
Partial
18
The permittee ensured all permits, certifications, and other measures for
applicators are followed.
Partial
18
NCS000394 Carolina Beach MS4 Audit 20201202 Page 17 of 25
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
Comments
Pond maintenance, along with pesticide/herbicide and fertilizer application, are contracted out. Town staff do not do any pesticide,
herbicide, or fertilizer application.
The town points to # 13 under Terms & Conditions in its contract with Dragonfly Pond Works as the requirement ensuring this
particular contractor is properly trained and licensed.
II.G.2.g
The ermittee implemented an employee trainin
P Pg program for employees involved
Staff Training
n implementing pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices.
No
---
Comments
II.G.2.h
The permittee described and implemented measures that prevent or minimize
Vehicle and
contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment
No
Equipment Cleaning
cleaning.
Comments
Additional
Comments:
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 18 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1
Facility Name:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
December 2, 2020
Operations Warehouse
^'1:50 PM
Facility Address:
Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.):
1121 N Lake Park Blvd.
Equipment and material storage
Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated:
Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector):
Scott Weber
No formal inspection
Name(s) and Titles) of Facility Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit:
Name
Title
Brian Stanberry
Public Works Director
Ben Meister
Project Manager
Observations
Facility Documentation/Training
Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific?
There is no SWPPP, or similar document, for this facility.
What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often?
The Operations Warehouse is a shared space, and the town does not have a formal stormwater training program for staff, so most
employees that use and access the space do not have any stormwater training.
Stormwater Division staff attend periodic seminars, typically offered through NC State University, on stormwater-related topics
such as maintenance requirements for different SCMs. Additionally, 5 Stormwater Division staff have achieved the SCM Inspection
and Maintenance Certification through NC State University (this includes the inspector observed during the facility inspection).
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
The inspector achieved his SCM certification through NC State University in 2007 and recently renewed the certification in 2017.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping?
The inspector appeared somewhat knowledgeable about the MS4 permit requirements for pollution prevention and good
housekeeping.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping?
Yes, the inspector is knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping.
Inspection Procedures
Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form?
No.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 19 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1
Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos?
No.
Does the MS4 inspectors process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)?
No, but this facility does not have a SWPPP or similar document in place.
Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge?
Yes.
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain:
No.
Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact?
If the inspector notices something that needs to be addressed, like a vehicle leaking oil, he goes ahead and puts a drip pan under
the vehicle and reports the issue to management. If a utilities employee finds an issue, they contact the utilities director who then
provides direction.
Inspection Results
Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)?
No.
If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided?
No.
Notes/Comments/Recommendations
An example of another good practice: equipment operators are required to do walk-arounds before using any piece of equipment.
This is a good example of where having detailed, written plans and procedures is necessary because then there is no guessing on
who to contact and what steps to take when possible pollution issues are identified. Also, all the staff that use and/or have access
to the warehouse need to receive basic stormwater training so they are aware of what to look for and the importance of good
housekeeping.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 20 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1
Outfall ID Number:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
15
December 2, 2020
—2:50 PM
Outfall Location:
Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.):
Sandpiper Road & Canal Drive
DWPP, 18", with a check valve
Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate,
Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.):
Carolina Beach Yacht Basin
There was a small flow, but no sheen, odor, Foatables, etc.
Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date):
One week prior
Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches:
Sunday night, so approximately 3 days 2
Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated:
Scott Weber
Observations
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
The inspector achieved his SCM certification through NC State University in 2007 and recently renewed the certification in 2017. He
is also the stormwater supervisor and has been with the town for many years, so he very familiar with the storm sewer system.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations?
Yes, the inspector is knowledgeable about identifying illicit discharges. However, the town does not have clear procedures for how
to investigate and enforce on illicit discharges, so the inspector's knowledge is limited in that regard.
Inspection Procedures
Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form?
Yes.
Does the inspector's process include taking photos?
Sometimes, if the inspector deems it necessary to visually document a discharge or needed maintenance.
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they?
No.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 21 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1
Inspection Results
Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)?
No.
Will a follow-up outfall inspection be conducted? If so, for what reason?
No follow-up inspection is needed at this outfall.
Notes/Comments/Recommendations
The town is working on asset management development (i.e. recording pipe size, material, and flow direction) for the entire storm
sewer system. Having this information will be invaluable when investigating illicit discharges going forward.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 22 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1
Site Name:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
Ocean Ridge
December 2, 2020
—2:20 PM
Site Address:
SCM Type:
The wet pond is accessed through 222 Winner Ave.
Wet pond built in 1982, initially not owned by the town
Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity):
November 23, 2020
Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated:
Most Recent MS4 Enforcement Activity (Include Date):
Scott Weber
None
Names) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit:
Name
Title
Brian Stanberry
Public Works Director
Ben Meister
Project Manager
Observations
Site Documentation
Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan?
Yes.
Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual?
Yes.
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
The inspector achieved his SCM certification through NC State University in 2007 and recently renewed the certification in 2017.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls?
Yes.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, O&M
requirements, etc.)?
Yes.
Inspection Procedures
Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format?
Yes, the inspector used a standardized paper form.
Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos?
Sometimes, if the inspector needs to document required maintenance.
Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections?
Yes.
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 23 of 25
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No.1
Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge?
Yes.
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain:
No.
Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing?
In this case, the site contact was the town so the inspector just needed to make sure any required maintenance was recorded on
the form and then transferred into Cityworks.
Comp liance/Enforcement
What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in?
None.
If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided?
N/A
Notes/Comments/Recommendations
NCS000394 Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 24 of 25
APPENDIX A: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
All supporting documentation cited in this report can be accessed from the Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources' online Laserfiche repository at the following link:
hftps://edocs.deq. nc.gov/WaterResources/Browse.aspx?dbid=0&sta rtid=717821
NCS000394_Carolina Beach MS4 Audit_20201202 Page 25 of 25