WQ0001863_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (8)

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AMENDMENT
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CITY OF MOUNT HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1588-93-005
Prepared For:
City of Mount Holly
131 South Main Street
Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120
Prepared By:
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
March, 1994

March 30, 1994
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
ATTENTION: Ms. Carolyn McCaskill
REFERENCE: MODIFICATION OF PERMIT NO. W00001863
City of Mount Holly Residual Solids Management Program
S&ME Project No. 1588-93-005
Dear Ms. McCaskill:
S&ME, Inc. is under contract with the City of Mount Holly to manage their land application
of residual solids program. S&ME wishes to modify the existing permit by adding an
additional source of wastewater residuals.
The additional source will be approximately 1,000,000 gallons of wastewater residuals
from the Mount Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) equalization basin. Operating
procedures will involve the land application of the Mount Holly WWTP residual solids, the
Mount Holly equalization basin residual solids and the Mount Holly Water Treatment Plant
(WTP) residual solids separately onto the same permitted fields. The 1,000,000 gallons
of equalization basin residual solids is proposed to be land applied during the last week
in June, 1994. The 1,500,000 gallons of WTP residual solids is proposed to be land
applied within the remainder of the current permit on an as -needed basis. All applications
will be done within agronomic rates in accordance with Permit No. W00001863 and
monitored closely by S&ME and the City of Mount Holly.
S&ME, Inc. 3718 Old Battleground Rood, Greensboro, North Carolina 27410, [phone], Fox [phone]
Mailing address: P.O. Box 38728, Greensboro, North Carolina 27438
Rpcycled Pa
clpC Paper

Modification of Permit No. WQ0001863
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
1588-93-005
March 30, 1994
Operating procedures for pathogen and vector attraction reduction will consist of the
same practice as performed on the WWTP residual solids. Lime stabilization will be
performed to raise the pH to 12 or higher by alkali addition, and without the addition of
more alkali, will remain at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an
additional 22 hours.
Your prompt attention in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Please contact us
immediately if you require additional information in the review of the permit modification.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Robert P. Willcox, Jr., C.P.S.Sc
Project Manager
G.F. Rick Baker, P.G.
Branch Manager
RPW/GFRB/dc
Enclosures
Permit Package
$400.00 submittal fee

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section No. Title Page
I_ MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................. 1
SPILL CONTROL PLAN ................................ 4
APPLICATION RATES.................................5
RESIDUAL SOLIDS CHARACTERISTICS .................... 7
MONITORING ....................................... 8
RECORDS..........................................9
II. LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT, EQUALIZATION BASIN
AND WATER TREATMENT SOLIDS COMBINED
III. LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
IV. LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
EQUALIZATION BASIN RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
V. LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
WATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
APPENDICES
APPENDIX
RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSES REPORTS
Wastewater Treatment Plant Residual Solids
Equalization Basin Residual Solids
Water Treatment Plant Residual Solids

MANAGEMENT PLAN
The residual solids management program proposes that residual solids from the Mount
Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Water Treatment Plant (WTP) be applied
to permitted fields as an agricultural resource at agronomic rates. The residual solids will
be applied to hay or pasture land at agronomic rates for total or partial replacement of
conventional N and P fertilizers. The actual amount of residual solids applied will be
dependent upon the nutrient requirement of the specific crop and the nutrient content of
the residual solids.
Residual solids application scheduling will be dependent upon residual solids production,
storage at the respective treatment plants, and the crop management program. On farms
utilized for hay and pasture production, residual solids will be applied in split applications
as is normally done when conventional fertilizers are applied to hay fields. These
applications will correspond prior to grass growth in the spring, after each cutting in the
growing season, or whenever most appropriate.
The fields will receive residual solids in an agronomic manner based on requirements
listed in Permit Number WO0001863. Residual solids will be applied at agronomic rates
which are limited by nitrogen loading rates. In this manner, ground water monitoring
should not be required. Soil pH will be adjusted immediately prior to, or during, residual
solids application to 6.5.
Prior to an application event, an application rate will be determined based on current
nutrient analysis.* Representative residual solids samples will be collected during the haul
period and composited for analysis. This composite sample will then be delivered to a
qualified laboratory familiar with residual solids analysis and analyzed for ammonia
nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite nitrogen, percent total solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, phosphorus,
17

potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, copper, zinc, cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead,
arsenic, mercury, selenium, molybdenum, aluminum, chlorides, sulfate, pH, and calcium
carbonate equivalency. Plant available nitrogen (PAN) will then be calculated from this
residual solids analysis. This information will be used to calculate the loading rate for the
field and crop.
Once the appropriate application rate has been calculated, the residual solids will be
removed from the respective treatment plant and transported to the site in trucks or
tankers adapted for dewatered or liquid residual solids. For liquid residual solids, the
residual solids will be loaded into 6,500 to 8,500 gallon tankers converted to haul liquid
residual solids.
The tankers will then travel major traffic routes to the fields whenever possible. Once at
the field, the tanker will proceed to a designated staging area. The residual solids will
then be transferred to a liquid residual solids applicator designed and operated to obtain
an even application consistent with agricultural requirements. S&ME contracts the
residual solids removal, hauling, and land application to Advanced Waste Management
Services, Inc. which employs an AG Chem Terragator 2505 to land apply the residual
solids.
All residual solids will be removed from the staging area by the end of the working day,
unless equipment breakdown or weather prohibits the residual solids application. At the
start of each day, all fields will be inspected by the field superintendent. Equipment will
only enter a field when conditions are appropriate for the application. Residual solids will
only be applied when the field is capable of supporting equipment. When field conditions
are not appropriate for an application, such as during wet periods, the residual solids will
remain at the WWTP until field conditions are suitable.
2

Prior to the residual solids operations, the field superintendent and Mount Holly WWTP
personnel will inspect the site. During the field inspection, the field superintendent will
note the standard DEM buffer zones including: homes, drainage ditches, roads, wells,
surface water, and property boundaries (listed in Table 1). On the basis of these
standard DEM buffers for land treatment programs, buffers will be established in the field.
These buffers will be identified in the field by the placement of pin flags.
TABLE 1
DEM Buffers for Current Permit W00001863
Application Method
Injection or Surface
Area Description Incorporation Spreading
--------------------- — -feet--------------------------------
Property boundary
100
100
Public private road
25
50
Development (residential)
200
400
Inhabited dwelling
200
400
Potable wells
private
100
100
public
100
100
Drainageways
50
100
Surface Water
50
100
3

SPILL CONTROL PLAN
MOUNT HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA
In the case of a spill, the following action shall be taken immediately:
1. Halt the source of the spill: Ruptured line or valve, or damaged tank unit.
2. Contain spill: Use straw bales to form a barrier. Straw hay bales can be
obtained from several sources for this purpose. Soil near the site can also be
used to form a barrier for containment.
3. Clean up: Use residual solids application equipment to recover as much of the
material as possible. After the application equipment has recovered as much
material as possible, it will be land applied as per the management plan. A
temporary sump pit may be dug in the containment area and spilled material
washed into it to enhance recovery.
4. Final Clean up: Any unrecoverable material will be washed from the road
surface and incorporated into an adjacent tillable area.
5. Notification: As soon as possible after a spill occurs notify:
A. Wastewater Treatment Plant operator at (704) 827 - 4261
B. Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 663 - 1699
C. Gaston County Sheriff's Department (704) 866 - 3160
D. Lincoln County Sheriff's Department (704) 732 - 9050
E. Fire Department if assistance is required for washdown
F. S&ME, Inc. (910) 288 - 7180
6. Management of clean up efforts: The field superintendent shall take
immediate charge of the clean up activities. Additional labor will be requested
from the treatment plant as needed.
7. Reporting: Within 24 hours of a spill the field superintendent shall present a
written report detailing the cause of the spill and all action taken in response to
the spill.
4

APPLICATION RATES
The residual solids application rate will be based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN)
requirement for the crop and the PAN content in the residual solids. The PAN
requirement for the specific crop will be derived from limits in current Permit No.
W00001863 (Table 2). Crops typically grown in the Gaston and Lincoln County area are
fescue, small grains, and soybeans.
TABLE 2
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Limits for Crops commonly grown In
Gaston and Lincoln County based on Permit No. W00001863
Croo Pan Recommendations
Ibs/ac.
Fescue
250
Soybeans
150
Small grain
100
The PAN recommendation for fescue hay is 250 pounds per acre. Soybeans are able to
fix N2 as NH3 in a symbiotic relationship with a nitrogen fixing bacteria. However,
soybeans will utilize nitrogen if it is applied in a plant available form. Based on the
existing permit the application rate for soybeans shall not exceed 150 pounds of PAN per
acre.
The PAN content of the residual solids will be based on, total ICeldahl nitrogen (TKN),
ammonium -nitrogen (NH4 N), nitrate -nitrogen (NO3 N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2N) content,
and the mineralization of organic N into inorganic N. Most of the nitrogen in the residual
solids is in an organic form. As the residual solids are incorporated into the soil, the soil
microorganisms utilize the residual solids as an energy and nutrient source. In the
process, a portion of the organic N is mineralized or biologically converted into inorganic
N.
5

Various environmental factors such as temperature, moisture, and carbon to nitrogen ratio
will affect the mineralization rate. Typical mineralization factors range from 0.2 to 0.4. A
mineralization rate of 0.30 has been selected for this land treatment program due to the
lime stabilization process.
The PAN application rate will be calculated based on the mineralization rate: TKN, NH4N,
NOO, NO2 N content; and method of application. Residual solids which are injected into
the soil typically retain a large portion of the NH3 gas which is found in the residual solids
or is converted from the NH4N form. However, when the residual solids are surface
applied to hay or fallow row crop fields, a large portion of the NH3N is volatilized and lost
as a nutrient for crop uptake. The actual plant available nitrogen content for equal
residual solids is less when the residual solids are surface applied compared to when the
residual solids are injected into the soil and the NH3N gas is trapped by the soil. To
reflect the lower PAN content for surface applied residual solids due to the volatilization
of NH3N gas, the portion of NH4N in the residual solids contributing to the PAN is
reduced by 50%.
The PAN content of the residual solids is then calculated for injected and surface
applications as follows:
A. PAN injected = 0.30 (TKN - NH4N) + NH4N + NO3-N + NO2 N
B. PAN surface applied = 0.30 (TKN - NH4N) + 0.5 (NH4 N) + NO3-N + NO2 N
where:
0.30 =
mineralization factor (lime stabilized residual solids)
TKN =
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NH4N =
Ammonia nitrogen
NO3-N =
Nitrate nitrogen
NO2 N =
Nitrite nitrogen
0.5 =
Volatilization factor
PAN Applied = (gal/ac)(8.34 Ib/gal)(% Solids)(% PAN)
6
-. t

RESIDUAL SOLIDS CHARACTERISTICS
Y The City of Mount Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) currently generates about
3,000,000 gallons per year of residual solids and has approximately 500,000 gallons of
residual solids storage capacity at the treatment plant. Also from the Mount Holly WWTP
a proposed 1,000,000 gallons of equalization basin wastewater residual solids is proposed
to be land applied on permitted sites. The City of Mount Holly Water Treatment Plant
(WTP) will produce approximately 1,500,000 gallons of alum residual solids. between
March 1994 and April 1995 when the permit expires. Characteristics of the residual solids
are shown on the attached application forms (Sections II-V), and are also given in
Appendix I. Results of the TCLP for both the WWTP and the WTP(Alum) analysis are
given in Appendix I. The residual solids characteristics are typical of other residual solids
generated by WWTP's and WTP's in North Carolina. Likewise, the TCLP results are well
below the maximum limits for a waste to be characterized as non -hazardous.
7

MONITORING
The residual solids and soil will be sampled at specific intervals to insure the beneficial
utilization for agricultural production. Residual solids samples will be obtained for each
land application event. The residual solids samples will be collected and delivered to a
laboratory which is qualified to analyze residual solids and is familiar with routine
environmental sample preparation and standards.
A residual solids analysis will be conducted for, but not limited to, the following
parameters, percent total solids, chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, arsenic,
mercury, selenium, molybdenum, sodium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite
nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate, potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium, calcium,
r, ammonia nitrogen, pH, and calcium carbonate equivalency. Annual TCLP analysis for
regulatory compliance will also be conducted.
Once each year, the fields will be sampled for routine soil fertility and lime requirements.
Although the soil samples will likely be collected in the fall or winter seasons, the soil
samples may also be collected between croppings. Once the soil samples are collected,
the soil samples will be delivered to either the North Carolina Department of Agriculture -
Agronomic Division or A & L Eastern Agricultural Laboratories, Inc. for routine soil
analysis.
0

RECORDS
Records pertinent to the successful management of the land application program will be
maintained for the benefit of the landowner, DEM, the City of Mount Holly, and the
Permittee. Each year an annual summary of the activities of the program will be prepared
and delivered to the appropriate agencies and participants on or before the 1 st of March.
The annual summary will include:
1. A) Source of residual solids
B) Date of residual solids application
C) Location of residual solids application (field number)
D) Method of application
E) Weather conditions
F) Soil conditions
G) Type of crop or crop to be grown on field
H) Volume of residual solids applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
1) Annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of residual solids, annual
and cumulative pounds/acre of each heavy metal (which shall include,
but not be limited to lead, nickel, cadmium, copper, zinc, chromium,
arsenic, mercury, molybdenum and selenium), annual pounds/acre of
plant available nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus
applied to each field
2. A representative annual soil analysis which will include the following
parameters: standard soil fertility test, % base saturation, phosphorus,
potassium, lead', zinc', magnesium, pH, manganese, cation exchange
capacity, sodium, nickel', cadmium', copper', and calcium.
_ .3. A quarterly residual solids analysis- which will include the following parameters:
% total solids, chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, sodium, total
nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate,
potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium, arsenic, mercury, molybdenum, selenium,
calcium, ammonia nitrogen, pH, and calcium carbonate equivalency.
4. An annual Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (fCLP) analysis of
residual solids
Soil analysis for these parameters shall be conducted once prior to permit renewal
on each site which has received sludge during the permit cycle.
E

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT, EQUALIZATION BASIN
AND WATER TREATMENT RESIDUAL SOLIDS COMBINED

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental :Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual. etc.):
S&ME, INC.
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Mr. Lawrence R. Matthews, President, S&ME, INC.
3. Mailing address: 3109 Spring Forest Road
City: Raleigh, State:
Telephone Number. ( 919 )
4. Application Date: March 31, 1994
872-2660
NC
Zip: 27604
5. Fee Submitted: $ 4n0.0n [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).]
6. Specify whether these residuals will be land applied to: X agricultural lands, forest, public contact sites,
reclamation sites; (Please bP advised, if these residuals will be distributed for lawn or home garden use, the
application for the Distribution of Residual Solids should be completed rather than this application.)
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, the Division will
review these as a separate request. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in a surface impoundment or disposal
thru landfilling. Explain: N/A
8. For Class B Residuals (or Class A Residuals to be land applied on a dedicated site), please specify the number of acres on
which residual solids are to be land applied under the authority of this permit
proposed in this application: N / A acres; total (current and proposed): N/A acres
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM):
2. Specify whether project is: new; renewal;; x_ modification
` For renewals, complete all sections included in the application, in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings
for the heavy metals and updated owner's agreement for =h site.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit
number WQ 0001 861 and its issue date junP 1 s , 1 99 i
lII. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared: _C; tF of Mn„n t H„ I l y wwTP
2. Facility permit number. Ncnn21 1 56 ; facility permit holder cry tv of Mount Ho11 g
3. Specify whether facility in M.1 is owned by: federal; private; state; _x local government; Specify
facility design flow:' 4 _ n mgd; facility average daily flow: _ 6 mgd;
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 1 of 22

type of residual storage Digesters ; volume of residual storage 500,000 gallons ; estimated
volume of residuals: 1 , 191 (dry tons/yr.); length of residuals storage at facility: 90 days
(the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that are separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers.
aeration basins, etc.); maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 90 days.
4. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: Yes, X No.
If Yes, please identify:
5. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Fd d i P M o h n lg
6. Facility contact's telephone number. ( 704 ) S 9 7 -4 9 h 1
7. Location of treatment facility: Nc State; Gaston . County
8. Mailing address: City Of Mount Holly WasteWater Treatment Plant
Broome Street, Mt. Holly, NC 28120
9. Latitude: 35 °-16' 0011 Longitude: 81 ° -01' 00"
10. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of domestic wastewater, treatment of industrial wastewater,
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? X Yes; No.
This includes facilities which are ci2ssifted as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, tinder 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority)
12. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; -L-No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
.Corrosivity for each residual.
Note: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
PPM,
REM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0:008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead -
5.0
FORIIM: LARS 11/93 Page 2 of 22

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE IS CURRENTLY BEING LIME STABILIZED

i indane
0.4
Methoxychlor
10.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pyridine
5.0
Silver
5.0
Toxaphene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
pH (2:1 volJwQ:
>2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
Mercury 0.2
Methyl ethyl ketone 200.0
Pentachlorophenol 100.0
Selenium 1.0
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7
Trichloroethylene 0.5
2,44-Trichlorophenol 2.0
Vinyl chloride 0.2
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE.
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
13. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Selenium
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
Mercury
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Calcium
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
% Total Solids
TKN
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
14. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
LAB ANALYSES (APPENDIX I)
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weieht Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weiebt Basis
Arsenic
75
3.35 2.27
Cadmium
85
0.5 4.00 3.00
Chromium
3000
Copper
4300
58.0 820.00 400.00
Lead
840
5.0 90.00 100.00
Mercury
57
---- 1.73 1.29
Molybdenum
75
---- 5.00 8.00
Nickel
420
35.0 40.00
Selenium
100
---- 1.29 1.73
Zinc
7500
2.0 1090.00 650.00
15. Specify whether these residuals are either.
(*1) (*2) (*3)
Class A, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(a). If Class A, please continue to number
16, skip number 17 and then continue on to number 18.
X Class B, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(b). If Class B, please skip number 16 and
then continue on to number 17.
(*1) Water Treatment Plant
(*2) Equalization Basin
(*3) Digesters Wastewater Treatment Plant
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 3 of 22

*Residuals Covered Under This Application Will Be Class B
16. In order for the residuals to be Class A, with respect to pathogens, cilhel Part a or Part b aad one of the options in Part c
N/Amust be completed (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. A Fecal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids, or
b. A S almonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
c. In addition to Part a or Part b being met, one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d. 5e, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met:
1. time/temperature - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained for a prescribed period of time, in
accordance with the following guidelines. The results (D) shall be the amount of time, in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature:
Time and Temrwrahm ('mi(WinPc
Total Solids
Temperature (t)
Minimum Time
Equation
Notes
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or = 20 minutes
D = 131,700,000
No heating of small
100.14 t
particles by warmed
gases or immiscible
li 'd.
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or = 15 seconds
D = 131,700,000
Small particles heated by
100.14 t
warmed gases or
immiscible liquid.
< 7%
> or = 500 C
> or = 15 seconds
D = 131,700.000
to
100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7%
> or = SOo C
F>or = 30 minutes
D = 50,070,000
100.14 t
2. alkaline treatment - the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time, the
temperature of the residuals should be greater than 520 C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period, the residuals are to be air dried to at least 50% total solids.
prior testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova - the residuals are analyzed for the presence of enteric viruses
(Plaque -forming units) [pfu] and viable helminth ova. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction
process and found to have densities of enteric virus <1 pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable helminth ova <1/4g
total solids, the residuals are Class A with respect to enteric virus and viable helminth ova until the next
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densities
of enteric virus > or = 1 pfu/4 g total solids or viable helminth ova > or =1/4 g total solids, and tested again after
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable helminth ova levels listed under "4" below, then the
processed residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable helminth ova when the operating
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are monitored and shown to be consistent with the values or ranges
of values documented
4. no prior testing for Enteric VirusNiable He min h Ova - if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reduction
processing for enteric viruses and viable hehninth ova, the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g of
total dry solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids, or the residuals
must be treated by a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" or a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" equivalent,
process.
5. The "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP) are described as follows:
a. Composting - using either the within -vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 551 C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method, the residuals are
raised to 550 C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
b. Heat Drying - residuals are dried by direct or indirect contact with hot gases to reduce the moisture content of
the residuals to 10% or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 800 C or
the wet bulb temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals, when the residuals leave the dryer, exceeds
800 C.
MUM: LARS 11/93 Page 4 of 22

c. Heat Treatment - liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 1800 C or higher for thirty minutes.
N/A d Thennophilic Aerobic Dig erion - liquid residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions
at residence times of ten days at temperatures of 551 C to 600 C.
e. Beta Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.0
megarad at room temperature (ca. 20' C).
f. Gamma Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co and
137Ce, at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature (ca. 200 C).
g. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 700 C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the
Pathogen Equivalency Committee.
17. In order for the residuals to be Class B, with respect to pathogens, one of the following criteria must be achieved
B-5 Please specify a, bl, b2, b3, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Digestion - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at 200 C and 60 days at 150 C.
2. Air QZing - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or basins for a minimum of three months. During two of
the three months, the ambient average daily temperature is above Qo C.
3. Anaerobic Digestion - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a mean cell residence time and temperature
between 15 days at 35o C to 55o C and 60 days at 200 C.
4. Comp so ling - using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals are raised to 40o C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in
the compost pile exceeds 550 C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact.
c. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
18. When residuals are being land applied, one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i,
or j) described below must be met.
F Specify the letter of the vector attraction reduction requirement that has been met (submit lab results, test results
and calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached
a. Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction is
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal This criterion should
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digestors, but not as readily met by aerobic digestors.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 18c or
18d
b. Anaerobic Digestio - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
demonstrated by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
40 days at 30° C to 370 C. If, at the end of the 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vector
attraction reduction is achieved.
C. Aerobic Dioeis ion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bench
scale unit for an additional 30 days at 200 C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than
15%, vector attraction reduction is achieved
FORM: LARS 11193 - " - Page 5 of 22

d. aerobic Digestion - The spec oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen
per hour per gram of -total dry solids at 20° C.
e. Aerobic Processes - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 400 C. During this time,
the average temperature shall be greater than 450 C.
f. Alkaline Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali, remains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
g. 12LYing (stabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that do not contain unstabilized solids, and which are generated
in a primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 75%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
h. Drving (unstabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that contains unstabilized solids, and which are generated in a
primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 90%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
i. Injection - Liquid residuals are injected below the land surface, with no significant amount of residuals present on the
land surface after 1 hour, unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be
injected within 8 hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process.
j . Incorporation - Residuals that are surface land applied shall be incorporated into the soil within 6 hours of application.
unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be incorporated within 8 hours
after discharge from the pathogen treatment process.
IV. RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION:
1. How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leakproof trucks, etc.)? 6,500 to 8,500 Gallon
Tankers Converted To Haul Liquid Residuals
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application? Terra—Gator
3. How will the -application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
(*Reference "MANAGEMENT PLAN" Page 1 (Section 1)
4. Will the land application operation utilize a contractor who specializes in Residuals Management or will the permittee
management the program? Contractor, X Permittee. If a contractor is utilized, provide the name of the firm, a
contact, address, and telephone number. Application Subcontractor:
Advanced Waste Management
P.O. Box 38040; 2353 Charles City Rd, Richmond, VA 23231
Mr. Gary Steele, President [phone]
V . SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES:
(This section shall be completed for all Class B residuals and Class A residuals applied to a dedicated
site. All others may continue to Section VI)
1. The following sites are to be used for land application under this permit application (please attach map(s),see La.]:
Application Area (acres] Maximum slope
Site No. Owner/Lessee (excluding buffers) (in percent)
* NO LAND APPLICATION SITES TO BE ADDED UNDER THIS PERMIT APPLICATION
Note: If more than five (5) sites are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the sites along
with the information listed below.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 6 of 22

a. A Vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location of each site in relation to at least two
;eograpnicai references and major intersection (nttmberea roaas, named streamslnvers, etc.).
b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineating both total and buffered ages.
This map must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or 25% of total site relief
(whichever is more descriptive) ana showing the property lines; all existing wells, ail surface waters and drainage ways
and all dweilin¢s within .00 feet of the land applicauon areas: and all buffers.
Mote: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larder buffers may be
required
1. 400 feet from any habitable residence for surface residual application.
200 feet from any habitable residence for subsurface residual injection.
2. 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B.
waters classified as SA or SB and any Class I or Class II impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking water.?
3. 100 feet between any surface residual application area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way,
50 feet between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.t
4. 50 feet between the residual application area and property lines for both surface and subsurface application (if the
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet, updated maps must be submitted
and new acreage delineated for the buffer to be reduced).
5. 10 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (upslope).
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (downslope).
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches.
t SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE WATERS
(as established by the Environmental Management Commission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION STTE(S). USE
THE ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 10 OF 22) TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION.
Note: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 18% for subsurface
application.
2. For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color, the depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the presence or absence of a
seasonal high water table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained in
NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the separation be less than one foot. This report must be signed by the soil
scientist and submitted with application.
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant know to be in the residual. A part of the agronomists recommendations must be a crop management
plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and how they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and submitted with application.
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with
any other significant parameter that has been shown to be contained in the residual:
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes):
And the following Metals:
pH
Phosphorus
Potassium
Acidity
Calcium
Manganese
Magnesium
Zinc
Copper
% Humic Matter
Sodium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by
calculation)
Arsenic
Lead
Nickel
Cadmium
Mercray
Selenium
Chromium
Molybdenum
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 7 of 22

In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet" (beginning on Page 12 of 22). If more than one residual is to be covered by
this permit additional worksheets must be attached.
V I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Five (5) complete copies of the permit application and five (5) copies of all required supporting information, including
cover letters must be submitted or the application package will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please explain how access to the land application sites, by both people and animals, will be controlled following the
application of residuals: *Reference "Management Plan"
Page 1 (Section 1)
a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days after the application of residuals.
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for 12 months following the last application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. Please explain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e. will
the sites be flagged): *Reference "Management Plan" Page 1 ( Section 1)
4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private Lands" for each land application site
that is not owned by the applicant. A copy of the DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be received from DEM.
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number.
6. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this application form; however, if attachments
are utilized, their location should be so indicated on the application form. All attachments must be numbered to correspond
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachments are part of a larger document, a
table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information.
Applicant's Certification:
I, Robert P . Wi 1 nx . Jr- , attest that this application for Mod i f i r a t; nn
of Permit No. W00001863
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if
all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and
attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature eLw„ l,J j t er c , 9-1 . Date 313119¢
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION
AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 8 of 22

* Items 1-7 Have Not Been Included Because Permit Application is for Modification with the
Addition of 1 Source of Residuals
Instructions:
Processing of this application will not be initiated until five (5) copies of all of the following
items have been submitted in addition to five(5) copies of the completed application form. If
any of the below items have been excluded from the package, please explain.
1. Is a general location map included?
YES or NO x
2. Is a site map (drawn to scale) included which delineates total and buffered acres and
shows all property lines, buffers, existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage
features, and any surface waters?
YES or NO x
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the projects location with respect to
State roads and named Surface waters?
YES or NO x
4. Is a signed soil scientist report included which defines the following:
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,
c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) recommended loading rate for the site,
YES or NO x
5. Is a signed agronomist's report included which identifies the crop and loading
recommendations for N-P-K?
YES or NO x
6. Is the Crop Management Plan included in the application package?
YES or NO x
7. Has the Land Owner's agreement been completed and signed?
YES or NO x
8. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5)-(eff. February 1, 1993):
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $400.00
Timely Renewals without Modifications $250.00
YES x or NO
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc. must
be inclued as a part of the application package.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 9 of 22

*Form Not Completed Because No Additional Sites Are Being Added At This Time
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located. you are required to submit this form. with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant:
City: State: Zip:
Telephone Number: ( )
3. Project Name:
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied:
5. Name of closest surface waters:
6. County(s) where land application site is located:
7. Map name and date:
8. Applicant Signature:
dry tons per year
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
Date:
FOILM: LARS 11193 Page 10 of 22

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (11/93)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancy
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimanc
Date
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Mecklenburg
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Robeson
Cabarrus
Rowan
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Richmond
Catawba
Stanly
Columbus Pender
Hamett
Sampson
Gaston
Union
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Iredell
Cleveland
Montgomery
Lincoln
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yam
Guilford
FOILM: LARS 11/93 . Page 11 of 22

CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
Phis work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE CALCULATIONS
(PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT NUMBER:
City Of Mt. Holly-WasteWater Treatment Plant, Water- Treatment Plant & Equalization Basin
Sludges Combined
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Wet Tons of Residual x % total solids/100
WWTP 500 Tons; WTP 595 Tons; Equalization Basin 56 Tons
x
Dry Tons
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS TO ESTABLISH THE PORTION OF
THE RESIDUAL THAT IS MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS PARAMETERS:
Each Source Varies
% Total Solids = * See Page Following Page 12 of 22 for Concentrations
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
m /L
+ % Solids (Decimal)
= m (dry wt.)
x 0.002
= lbsJdry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
=
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
=
Chromium
=
x 0.002
=
Copper
=
x 0.002
=
Lead
=
x 0.002
=
Mercury
=
x 0.002
=
Molybdenum
=
x 0.002
=
Nickel '
=
x 0.002
=
Selenium
x 0.002
=
Zinc
=
x 0.002
=
Ammonia-N
=
x 0.002
=
Calcium
=
x 0.002
=
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
=
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
=
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
=
Potassium
=
x 0.002
=
Sodium
=
x 0.002
=
TKN
=
x 0.002
=
FORIM: LARS 11/93 Page 12 of 22

CITY OF MOUNT HOLLY
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
COMBINED ANALYSIS: WWTP; WTP; EQUALIZATION BASIN
Parameter....
..........
.......
1..............-.......................................................... ...................
.
.......................
I ...........
.
BASIN
... .....
......
OD.A..... ........
TOTALS...
..- .
TKN (Mg/Kg)
60,100.00
5,200.00
44,800.00
60,100.00
6,188.00
4,928.00
30,963.478
Phosphorus
37.20
4.00
14.00
37.20
4.76
1.54
18.913
Potassium
4.00
2.20
2.60
4.00
2.62
0.29
3.002
PAN (Surface)
43.20
3.60
29.50
43.20
4.28
3.25
22.056
Ammonia Nitrogen
16,600.00
100.00
5,100.00
16,600.00
119.00
561.00
7,513.043
Calcium
61,300.00
800.00
6,200.00
61,300.00
952.00
682.00
27,362.609
Magnesium
2,600.00
3,000.00
1,900.00
2,600.00
3,570.00
209.00
2,773.478
Sodium
9,400.00
300.00
23,300.00
9,400.00
357.00
2,563.00
5,356.522
Sulfur
8.40
5.80
6.60
8.40
6.90
0.73
6.969
Nitrate N
250.00
221.00
285.00
250.00
262.99
31.35
236.670
Copper
0.80
0.12
1.64
0.80
0.14
0.18
0.488
Cadmium
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.004
Chromium
3.10
0.06
0.22
3.10
0.07
0.02
1.389
Lead
0.20
0.01
0.18
0.20
0.01
0.02
0.101
Nickel
0.19
0.07
0.08
0.19
0.08
0.01
0.123
Zinc
1.30
0.14
2.18
1.30
0.17
0.24
0.742
Arsenic
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.003
Mercury
0.00
0.00
0.00,
0.00,
0.00.
0.001,
Molybdenum
0.02
0.01
0.021
-0.001
0.001
0.007
Selenium
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001

C . PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND LAND APPLICATION
AREA REQUIREMENTS:
CONSTITUENTS
Me/Ke - DRY WEIGHT
TKN
30,963
AMMONIA-N
7,513
NO3-NO2-N
237
1. MINERALIZATION RATE (MR) 30
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Lime Stabilized 30%
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerrobicca�allyy Digested Residuals 120%
*Mt. Holly Talpsoosweroblically Digested Residuals That Arse Lime Stabilized.
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application 'method proposed:
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR) x (TKN - NH3) + .5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN=0.30 xf30.963 - 7,513+.5x(7,513 + 237
PAN =
11,028
_ PPM DRY WEIGHT *All Residuals Will Be Surface Applied
To Pasture And Hay.Land.
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN= x( - )+( )+
PAN =
PPM DRY WEIGHT
N/A
3. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS
PER DRY TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS
LId
I IFI 1/1
_ (PAN in PPM DRY WEIGHT) x 0.002
= 22.06 POUNDS / DRY TON
_ (PAN in POUNDS/ DRY TON) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL.
22.06 x 1,151
25,391 POUNDS
FORM:..LARS 11/93
Page 13 of 22

DUE TO THE -FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY OVER TIME. THE AMOUNT OF
-NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN
INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
THIS BEING THE CASE, PLEASE ATTACH AN EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON
LOADING RATES. SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 60 POUNDS
4. CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
(Division Recommendations)
CROP(S) PAN
(lbsJacre/year)
Alfalfa
200
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
220
Blue Grass
120
Corn (Grain)
160
Corn (Silage)
200
Cotton
70
Fescue
250
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
75
Milo
100
Small Grain (Wheat, barley, oats)
100
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
180
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
220
Soybeans
200
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
200
(Provide for Crops Specified)
PAN (lbsJacre/year)
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendations:
5. TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABOVE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX. TOTAL LBS, OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
25,391 t 250 Lbs/Pan/AC
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 101.56 ACRES
THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN
UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
FORIM: LARS 11/93 Page 14 of 22

IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH
THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE FORMAT
OUTLINED ABOVE.
D . CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
("This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg x % solids = mg/l)
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. + [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] 0.5
14.5 t [0.5 (85.3 + 14.4 )3 0.5
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) + Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 334 (mg/1) + 23 = 14.5
CALCIUM (Ca) 1,705 (mg/1) + 20 = 85.3
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 173 (Mg/1) + 12 = 14.4
SAR = 2.05
E. ANNUAL MERCURY CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR MERCURY FROM B ABOVE
MERCURY= 0.001
lbs./dry ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS = 1,151
TOTAL MERCURY IN POUNDS LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
dry tons/year
= MERCURY (lbsJton) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
0.001
1.15
x 1,151
POUNDS PER YEAR
MAXIMUM MERCURY LOADING RATE PER YEAR AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR PART 503.13(b)(4) IS 0.85
KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.75 POUNDS PER ACRE.
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL MERCURY CALCULATED ABOVE:
1 '•
1.15 y 0.75
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 1.5
ACRES
F . DETERMINE THE. TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND APPLICATION BY
COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND THAT NEEDED FOR MERCURY. WHAT IS
THE LIMITING FACTOR?: PAN x OR MERCURY HOW MANY ACRES ARE
NEEDED? 101.6 HOW MANY ACRES OF LAND APPLICATION ARE
AVAILABLE? IF THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
ACRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN ONE RESIDUAL
OR SITE,. PLEASE 'ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL
THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO ONE POINT.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 15 of 22

G. DETERMINE: THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE LIFETIME HEAVY METAL
LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING:
THE SITE LIFE IS DETE VINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS THAT THE SITE CAN RECEIVE
THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE METALS
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON ARSENIC
POUNDS PER TON OF ARSENIC IN RESIDUAL = 0.003
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3*
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR= n . n n 3 x 11.3
*Based on Worse Case of 11.3 Tons AC/Yr
11.3 Tons/AC/Yr Would Meet The Maximum lbs/Pan/Yr of = n _ n'14 lbs./acre/year
250 For Fescue
SITE LIFE = ARSENIC LUTI'LNM ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 36.0 lbs./acre = 1 , n 5 9 YEARS
( 0.034 )
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.004
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 0.004 a 11.3
= n.n45 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = CADMIUM LIFETIME AL .LOW E LOADING
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 34.0 lbs./acre = 755.5 YEARS
( 0.045 )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON CHROMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CHROMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 1.389
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 1.389 x 11.3
15.70 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = CHROMIUM LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2,677.0 lbs./acre = 170.5 YEARS
( 15.70 )
FORM: LARS 11193 — Page 16 of 22

4. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 0.488
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
SITE LIFE = COPPER LIFF= AT 10W B .E T O LN .
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 1338.0 lbs./acre = 243 YEARS
( 5.51 )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.101
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR
SITE LIFE = LEAD LIFETLAE ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 267.0 lbs./acre = 234 YEARS
( 1.14 )
6. SITE LIFE BASED ON MERCURY
POUNDS PER TON OF MERCURY IN RESIDUAL = 0.001
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
0.488 x 11.3
5.51 lbs./acre/year
= 0.101 x 11.3
1.14 lbs./acre/year
0.001 x 11.3
0.01 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = MERCURY LIFETIIVIE ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 15.0 lbs./acre = 1,500 YEARS
( 0.01 )
7. SITE LIFE BASED ON MOLYBDENUM
POUNDS PER TON OF MOLYBDENUM INRESIDUAL = 0.007
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MOLYBDENUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.007 x 11.3
= 0.079 lbs./acre/year
FORM: LARS 11/93 'Page 17 of 22

• ra • 2u iaa•wi • • :. �.
•• . • • :. . .D.
SITE LIFE = 16.0 lbs./acre = 202.5 YEARS
( 0.079 )
S. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.123
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
SITE LIFE = NICKEL LIFETLIYM ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 374.0lbs./acre = 269 YEARS
( 1.39 )
9. SITE LIFE BASED ON SELENIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF SELENIUM IN RESIDUAL = n _ nn t
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 11.3
PROJECTED POUNDS OF SELE- .WM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR
SITE LIFE = SELENIUM LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF SELENIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 89.0 lbs./acre = 8,900 YEARS
( 0.01 )
10. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
0.123 x 11.3
1.39 lbs./acre/year
0.001 x 11.3
= n _ n t lbs./acre/year
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 0,742
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = n _ 7 G 9 x 11 A
9. 3 R lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = ZINC LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2.498.0 lbsJacre = 298 YEARS
( 8.38 )
COMPARE THE- TEN (10) METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL THAT
WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS cnrnmi nm AND THE SITE LIFE IS t 7n _ s YEARS.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 18 of 22

* No New Sites Being Added With This Permit Modification
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee:
Contact Person:
Address of Permittee:
List of wastewater residuals to be applied .to these lands:
Site ID Number:
Field Number.
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application:
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns:
Intended use or disposition of crops:
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as described. herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 11193 Page 19 of 22

STIPULATIONS:
The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations..'
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 20 of 22

1 4. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reverence to the subject matter of this Agreement
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional or other waste product, including wastewater residual sources,
other than the residuals specified by this permit is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LARS 11/93 . Page 21 of 22

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t
1, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Permittee to apply sludgeiresidual to my lands as speed herein.
Land Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission Expires
SEAL:
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt:t*.tt.
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
�tttttttttt:ttttttttttttttttttttttttttftttttt�ttt�tttt*t
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permittee_
Date
FORM: LARS 11193 Page 22 of 21

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
MOUNT HOLLY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET

CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE CALCULATIONS
(PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT NUMBER:
CITY OF MT. HOLLY WWTP- PERMIT NO. NCO021156
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Wet Tons of Residual x % total solids/100
= 3,000,000 gals x 4.0%
= 500± Dry Tons
*WWTP Residual Solids Average Approximately 4% Solids
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS TO ESTABLISH THE PORTION OF
THE RESIDUAL THAT IS MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS PARAMETERS:
*See Page Following Page 12 Of 22 For Concentrations
% Total Solids = 2.83
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
m /L
+ % Solids (Decimal)
mQlk dry wt.
x 0.002
= lbs./dry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
=
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
=
Chromium
=
x 0.002
=
Copper
=
x 0.002
=
Lead
=
x 0.002
=
Mercury
=
x 0.002
=
Molybdenum
=
x 0.002
=
Nickel
=
x 0.002
=
Selenium
=
x 0.002
=
Zinc
=
x 0.002
=
Ammonia-N
=
x 0.002
=
Calcium
=
x 0.002
=
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
=
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
=
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
=
Potassium
=
x 0.002
=
Sodium
=
x 0.002
=
TKN
=
x 0.002
=
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 12 of 22

CITY OF MT. HOLLY
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
SLUDGEANALYSIS
Sludge Type: Wastewater Treatment Plant
Date: 02/17/94
% Solids: 2.83
PH: 8.5
Parameter
%_'
PPM:Dry Werght
% x-1.0
Pounds/DryTan
Pi?M x 0 002 .....: :
-
Nitrogen TKN
6.01
60100.00
120.200
Phosphorus
1.86
18600.00
37.200
Potassium
0.20
2000.00
4.000
PAN (injected)*
2.990
29900.00
59.800
PAN (surface)*
2.160
21600.00
_......... _. __._....__ __..
?iii4:3200>
...........................................................
........................................................
Ammonia Nitrogen
1.66
16600.00
33.200
Calcium
6.13
61300.00
122.600
Magnesium
0.261
2600.00
5.200
Sodium
0.94
9400.00
18.800
Sulfur
0.42
4200.00
8.400
Calcium Carbonate Eq.
4.99
49900.00
99.800
Nitrate N
--
250.00
0.500
Nitrite N
- -
1.65
0.003
Copper
- -
400.00
0.800
Cadmium
--
3.00
0.006
Chromium
--
1550.00
3.100
Lead
- -
100.00
0.200
Nickel
- -
95.00
0.190
Zinc
- -
650.00
1.300
Chloride
- -
2300.00
4.600
Aluminum
- -
11500.00
23.000
Arsenic
- -
2.27
0.005
Mercury
- -
1.29
0.003
Mol bdenum
--
8.00
0.016
Selenium
--
1.731
0.003 1.
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N)+Ammonia N+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (6.01-1.66) + 1.66 + 0.025 + 0.000 = 2.990 % PAN
Surface Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N)+ (0.5) (Ammonia N)+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (6.01-1.66) + (0.5) (1.66) + 0.025 + 0.00 = 2.160 % PAN
01-Mar-94

C . PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND LAND APPLICATION
AREA REQUIREMENTS:
CONSTITUENTS
Nl"g - DRY WEIGHT
TKN
60,100
AMMONIA-N
16,600
NO3-NO?-N
250
1. MINERALIZATION RATE (MR)
30 %
('These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Lime Stabilized 30%
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value ispppprroo
*MT. HOLLY WWTP HAS AEROBICALLY DIGESTED RESIDUALS THAT ARE LIME STABILIZED.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed:
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR) x (TKN - NH3) + .5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN= 0.30 X(60,100 -16,600 )+.5x(16,600 )+ 250
PAN = 21,600 PPM DRY WEIGHT *All Residuals Will Be Surface Applied to
Pasture and Hay Land.
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKNI - NH3) + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N) N/A
PAN= x( )+( )+
PAN =
PPM DRY WEIGHT
3. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR. 500
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = (PAN, in mglkg DRY Wt.) x 2000 POUNDS / TON
PER DRY TON 11000,000
= (PAN in PPM DRY WEIGHT) x 0.002
— 4 3.2 0 ' POUNDS / DRY TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = (PAN in POUNDS/ DRY TON) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL
43.20 x 500
21,600
POUNDS
FORM:. -LARS 11/93 Page 13 of 22

DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGENN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY OVER TIME. THE AMOUNT OF
NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN YEARS FOLLOWING THE lIVMAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN
INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
THIS BEING THE CASE, PLEASE ATTACH AN EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON
LOADING RATES. SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 60 POUNDS
4. CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
(Division Recommendations)
CROP(S) PAN
(lbsJacre/year)
Alfalfa
200
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
220
Blue Grass
120
Corn (Grain)
160
Corn (Silage)
200
Cotton
70
Fescue
250
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
75
Milo
100
Small Grain (Wheat, baricy, oats)
100
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
180
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
220
Soybeans
200
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
200
(Provide for Crops Specified)
PAN (1bsJacre/year)
PIease provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendations:
5. TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABOVE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX. TOTAL LBS. OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
= 21,600 Lbs PAN y 250 Lbs/Pan/Ac
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 86.40 ACRES
* THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN
UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 14 of 22

IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH
THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE FORMAT
OUTLINED ABOVE.
D . CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
("This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg x % solids = mg/1)
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. + [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] 0.5
11.6 y C0.5 (70.6 + 6.2)1 0.5 = 1.87
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) + Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 266.0 (mg/1). 23 = 11.6
CALCIUM (Ca) 1412.0 (mgil) + 20 = 70.6
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 74. 0 (mg/1) + 12 = 6.2
SAR = 1.87
E. ANNUAL MERCURY CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR MERCURY FROM B ABOVE
MERCURY— 0.003 lbs./dry ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS = 500 dry tons/yam
TOTAL MERCURY IN POUNDS LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
= MERCURY (lbsJton) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
Qp 1l II
1.50 POUNDS PER YEAR
MAXIMUM MERCURY LOADING RATE PER YEAR AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR PART 503.13(b)(4) IS 0.85
KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.75 POUNDS PER ACRE.
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL MERCURY CALCULATED ABOVE:
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL POT JNDS OF MERCi1RY
0.75 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
1 _90 - 0_79
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 2.0 ACRES
F . DETERMINE THE. TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND APPLICATION BY
COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND THAT NEEDED FOR MERCURY. WHAT IS
THE LIMITING FACTOR?: PAN X OR MERCURY HOW MANY ACRES ARE
NEEDED? 86.4 HOW MANY ACRES OF LAND APPLICATION ARE
AVAILABLE? 478IF THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
ACRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN ONE RESIDUAL
OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL
THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO ONE POINT.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 15 of 22

G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE LIFETIME HEAVY METAL
LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING:
THE SITE LIFE IS DETERIIIINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS THAT THE SITE CAN RECEIVE
THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE METALS
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON ARSENIC
POUNDS PER TON OF ARSENIC IN RESIDUAL = 0.005
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8*
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
*Based On Worse Case of 5.8 Tons/AC/YR
5.8 Tons/AC/YR Would Meet The Maximum Lbs./PAN/YR of
250 For Fescue
SITE LIFE = ARSE!qIC L9 THE ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 36.0 lbs./acre = 1,241 YEARS
( 0.029 )
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.006
0-005 X 5.8
0.029 lbs./acre/year
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.006 X 5.9
n _ n35 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = CADMIUM LII E= ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 34.0 lbs./acre = 971 YEARS
( 0.035 )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON CHROMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CHROMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 3.1
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 3.1 X 5.8
17.9 8 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = CHROMIUM LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2.677.0 lbs./acre = 149 YEARS
( 17.98 )
FORM: LARS 11/93 — Page 16 of 22

4. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 0.80
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR =
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
SITE LIFE = COPPER LIFETLME ALLOWABLE LOADINCT
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 1.338.0 lbs./acre = 288 YEARS
( 4.64 )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.20
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR =, 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR
= 0.80 x 5.8
= 4.64 lbs./acre/year
0.20 x 5.8
1.16
lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = L-E LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 267.0 lbs./acre = 230 YEARS
( 1.16 )
6. SITE LIFE BASED ON MERCURY
POUNDS PER TON OF MERCURY IN RESIDUAL = 0.003
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.003 x 5.8
0.017 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = MERCURY LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 15.0 lbs./acre = 882 YEARS
( 0.017 ),
7. SITE LIFE BASED ON MOLYBDENUM
POUNDS PER TON OF MOLYBDENUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.016
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MOLYBDENUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.016 x 5.8
0 , 093 lbs./acre/year
FORM: LARS 11/93 'Page 17 of 22

SITE LIFE _ MOLYB122,7111 1 LIFE77v T OWARLE LOADING
POUNDS OF MOLYBDD"LIM, APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 16.0 lbs./acre = 172 YEARS
( 0.093 )
8. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.190
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 0.190 x 5.8
= 1.10 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = NICKEL LIFE= ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 374.0 lbs./acre = 340 YEARS
( 1.10 )
9. SITE LIFE BASED ON SELENIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF SELENIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.003
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 5.8
PROJECTED POUNDS OF SELF—NfUM APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 0.003 x 5.8
0.017 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = SELENIUM LIFFITVIE ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF SELENIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 89.0 lbs./acre = 5,235 YEARS
( 0.017 )
10. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 1.30
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR =
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR
c Q
SITE LIFE = ZINC LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2.498.0 lbs./acre = 331 YEARS
( 7.54 )
1.30 x 5.8
7.54 lbs./acre/year
COMPARE THE TEN (10) METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL THAT
WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS Chromium AND THE SITE LIFE IS 149 YEARS.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 18 of 22

CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
EQUALIZATION BASIN
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE CALCULATIONS
. (PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT NUMBER:
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Wet Tons of Residual x % total solids/100
= 1,000,000 Gals x 1.34%
56± Dry Tons
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS TO ESTABLISH THE PORTION OF
THE RESIDUAL THAT IS MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS PARAMETERS:
% Total Solids = 1.34 *See Page Following Page 12 Of 22
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
me/L
+ % Solids (Decimal)
= me/ka dry wt.)
x 0.002
= 1bsJdry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
=
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
=
Chromium
=
x 0.002
=
Copper
=
x 0.002
=
Lead
=
x 0.002
=
Mercury
=
x 0.002
=
Molvbdenum
=
x 0.002
=
Nickel
=
x 0.002
=
Selenium
=
x 0.002
=
Zinc
=
x 0.002
=
Ammonia-N
=
x 0.002
=
Calcium
=
x 0.002
=
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
=
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
=
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
=
Potassium
=
x 0.002
=
Sodium
=
x 0.002
=
TKN
=
x 0.002
=
FORM: LARS 11193 Page 12 of 22

. CITY OF MT. HOLLY
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
SLUDGE ANALYSIS
Sludge Type: Wastewater Treatment Plant
Date: 02/17/94
%Solids: 1.34 Equalization Basin
PH: 7.4
........... .. .......... .. .............
*.,'.'R:m""'r.,a"' m­ t
... ..... ...............................
% .:.: .... ..... ...............
X., ................
.... ............ :. ..:. .
........ . . .
. . ............
. .. ............................................ .....
............................. .. ....
.............................
... .... ................................. .. ....
. .... .......
.... ............ ...
......
.........................
.... ...
I ....
. ....
0 X . .....
........
P RM .002 ...........
Nitrogen (TKN)
4.48
44800.00
89.600
Phosphorus
0.70
7000.00
14.000
Potassium
0.13
1300.00
2.600
PAN (injected)*
1.730
17300.00
34.600
PAN (surface)*
1.475
14750.00
...........
» > . ...
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.51
5100.00
10.200
Calcium
0.62
6200.00
12.400
Magnesium
0.19
1900.00
3.800
Sodium
2.33
23300.00
46.600
Sulfur
0.33
3300.00
6.600
Calcium Carbonate Eq.
0.37
3700.00
7.400
Nitrate N
---
285.00
0.570
Nitrite N
0.46
0.001
Copper
820.00
1.640
Cadmium
4.00
0.008
Chromium
110.00
0.220
Lead
90.00
0.180
Nickel
40.00
0.080
Zinc
1090.00
2.180
Chloride
- - -
8340.00
16.680
Aluminum
39400.00
78.800
Arsenic
3.35
0.007
Mercury
1.73
0.003
IM01 bdenum
5.00
0.010
,lSelenium
1.29
0.003
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N)+Ammonia N+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (4.48-0.51) + 0.51 + 0.029 + 0.000 = 1.730 % PAN
Surface Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N) + (0.5) (Ammonia N)+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (4.48-0.51) + (0.5) (0.51) + 0.029 + 0.00 = 1.475 % PAN
01 -Mar-94

C . PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND LAND APPLICATION
:AREA REQUIREMENTS:
CONSTITUENTS
I ML-fKs - DRY WEIGHT
TKN
44,800
AMMONIA-N
5,100
NO3-NO?-N
I 285
1. MINERALIZATION RATE (MR)
30
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Lime Stabilized 30%
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed:
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR) x (Ti N - NH3) + .5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN= .30 x 4( 4,800- 5,100 )+.5x( 5,100 + 285
PAN = 14,745 PPM DRY WEIGHT
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN= x( )+( )+
PAN =
PPM DRY WEIGHT
*All Residuals Will Be Surface Applied
To Pasture And Hay Land
3. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR:
56
TOTALIN • • (PAN u 1. , DRY . I.Id POUNDS •
PER DRY TON11000,000
= (PAN in PPM DRY WEIGHT) x 0.002
29.49 POUNDS / DRY TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = (PAN in POUNDS/ DRY TON) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL
29.49 x 56
1,651 POUNDS
FORM:..LARS 11/93 Page 13 of 22

DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY OVER TIME. THE AMOUNT OF
NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN
INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
THIS BEING THE CASE, PLEASE ATTACH AN EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON
LOADING RATES. SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 60 POUNDS
4. CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
(Division Recommendations)
CROP(S) PAN
(1bsJacre/vear)
Alfalfa
200
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
220
Blue Grass
120
Corn (Grain)
160
Corn (Silage)
200
Cotton
70
Fescue
250
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
75
Milo
100
Small Grain (Wheat, baricy, oats)
100
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
180
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
220
Soybeans
200
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
200
(Provide for Crops Specified)
PAN (lbsJacre/year)
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendations:
5. TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABOVE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX. TOTAL LBS. OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
1,651 Lbs. PAN t 250 LBS/PAN/AC
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 6.60 ACRES
• THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN
UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
FOILM: LARS 11/93 Page 14 of 22

IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR CERTAIN SITES. PLEASE ATTACH
THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE FORMAT
OUTLINED ABOVE.
D. CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
(**This section must be completed in mg/1, to convert: mg/kg x % solids = mg/1)
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. + [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] 0.5
13.56 X L0.5 (4.15 + 2.08)3 0.5 =
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) + Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 312 (mgil) + 23 = 13.56
CALCIUM (Ca) 83 (mg/1) + 20 = 4.15
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 25 (mg/1) + 12 = 2.08
SAR = 7.68
E. ANNUAL MERCURY CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR MERCURY FROM B ABOVE
MERCURY = 0.003
lbs./dry ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
TOTAL DRY TONS = 5 6.0 dry tons/year
TOTAL MERCURY IN POUNDS LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
= MERCURY (lbsJton) x TOTAL TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
0.003
0.168
x 56.0
POUNDS PER YEAR
MAXIMUM MERCURY LOADING RATE PER YEAR AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR PART 503.13(b)(4) IS 0.85
KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.75 POUNDS PER ACRE.
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL MERCURY CALCULATED ABOVE:
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL . POUNDS OF MERCURY
0.75 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
0.168 y 0.75
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = 0.22
ACRES
F. DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND APPLICATION BY
COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND THAT NEEDED FOR MERCURY. WHAT IS
THE LIMITING FACTOR?: PAN X OR MERCURY HOW MANY ACRES ARE
NEEDED? 6.60 HOW MANY ACRES OF LAND APPLICATION ARE
AVAILABLE? 478.8 IF THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
ACRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN ONE RESIDUAL
OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL
THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO ONE POINT.
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 15 of 22

G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE LIFETIME HEAVY METAL
LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING:
-'HE SITE LIFE IS DETERMINED BY CALCL'LATLNG THE NUMBER OF YEARS THAT THE SITE CAN RECEIVE
THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE METALS
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON ARSENIC
POUNDS PER TON OF ARSENIC IN RESIDUAL = 0.007
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR
*Based On Worse Case Of 8.5 Tons/AC/Yr
8.5 Tons/AC/Yr Would Meet the Maximum Lbs/PAN/Yr of 250
For Fescue
SITE LIFE = ARSL-NI IFEMAF ALLOWA RT -F LO D
POUNDS OF ARSENIC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 36.0 lbs./acre = 600 YEARS
( 0.06 )
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.008
0.007 X 8.5
0.06 lbs./acre/year
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.008 X 8.5
0.068 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = CADMIUM LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADIN 7
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 34.0 lbs./acre = 500 YEARS
( 0.068
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON CHROMIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF CHROMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.220
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR, = 0.220
1.87
SITE LIFE = CHROMIUM LEI= AT-LOWA13LE LQADINQ
POUNDS OF CHROMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2.677.0 lbslacre = 1431.5 YEARS
( 1.87
X 8.5
_ lbs./acre/year
FORM: LARS 11/93 — Page 16 of 22

4. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 1.64
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROTECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 1.64 x 8.5
13.94 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE COPPER LIFE= ALLOWABLE F LOADING
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 1.338.0 lbs./acre = 96 YEARS
( 13.94 )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0,180
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.180 x 8.5
= 1.53 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = L-IFFMA-F ALLOWABLE LOADIN
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 267.0 lbs./acre = 174.5 YEARS
( 1.53 )
6. SITE LIFE BASED ON MERCURY
POUNDS PER TON OF MERCURY IN RESIDUAL = 0.003
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR
0 0.003 x 8.5
0.026 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = MERCURY LIFE1M ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF MERCURY APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 15.0 lbs./acre = 577 YEARS
( 0.026 )
7. SITE LIFE BASED ON MOLYBDENUM
POUNDS PER TON OF MOLYBDENUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.010
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF MOLYBDENUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.010 x 8.5
= 0.085 lbs./acre/year
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 17 of 22

SITE LIFE =y10LYBDE I T-M LIFMWE ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF MOLYBDD,U.M APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 16.0 lbs./acre = 188 YEARS
( 0.085 )
8. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.08
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.09 x 9.5
SITE LIFE = NICKEL LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 374.0 lbs./acre = 550 YEARS
( 0.68 )
9. SITE LIFE BASED ON SELENIUM
POUNDS PER TON OF SELENIUM IN RESIDUAL =
0.003
n _ i; R lbs./acre/year
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF SEL.ENTUM APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0,003 x 8.5
= n _ n ? ti lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = SELENIUM LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF SELENIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 89.0 lbs./acre = 3$ 423 YEARS
( 0.026 )
10. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 2.180
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 8.5
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 2.180 x 8.5
18.53 lbs./acre/year
SITE LIFE = ZINC LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = 2.498.0 lbs./acre = 1 3 5 YEARS
( 18.53 )
COMPARE THE TEN (10) METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL THAT
WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS Conner AND THE SITE LIFE IS 96 YEARS.
9
FORM: LARS 11/93 Page 18 of 22

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
MOUNT HOLLY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 11 (4/91)
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This -vorksheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management
in reviewing this application as.expeditiousiv as possible. Its preparation -in a
complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover
multiple sources of residuals, different residuals from the same source or sites
with vaned CEC, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE
CALCULATIONS (PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT
NUMBER.
City of Mt. Holly WTP - Permit No. WQ0003444
What is the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Tons of Residual x % total solids
1,500,000 x 9.53
= 595+/- Tons on an as demand basis
*Total dry tons of WTP residual to be land applied within remainder of permit*
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger
initial application, please attach a detailed explanation and provide calculations for
each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH THE
PORTION OF THE RESIDUAL MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS
PARAMETERS. LIST ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS AS NEEDED.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL
CONCENTRATIONS.
PARAMETER
%
x 10.000
_ mtlkg
rye
TKN
0.52
10000 =
5,200
AMMONIA-N
0.01
10000 =
100
N04-NO3-N
10000 =
221
PHOSPHORUS
0.20
10000 =
2,000
SULFUR
0.29
10000 =
2,900
POTASSIUM
0.11
10000 =
1,100
CALCIUM
0.08
10000 =
800
_s
MAGNESIUN1
0.30
10000 =
31000
SODIUM
0.03
10000 =
300
IRON
10000 =
11 of 25
x .002 LBSIDRY TON
0.002 = 10.4
0.002 = 0.2
0.002 = 0.44
0.002 = 4.0
0.002 = 5.8
0.002 = 2.2
0.002 = 1.6
0.002 = 6.0
0.002 = 0.6
0.002 =

ALUMINUM
10000 =
MANGANESE
10000 =
COPPER
10000 =
ZINC
10000 =
CADMIUM
10000 =
CHROMIUM
10000 =
NICKEL
10000 =
LEAD
1Q000 =
ARSENIC
10000 =
MERCURY
10000 =
SELENIUM
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 12 (4/91)
64,000
0.002 =
128_0
0.002 =
58
0.002 =
0.12
72
0.002 =
0.14
0.5
0.002 =
0.001
30
0.002 =
0.06
35
0.002 =
0.07
5
0.002 =
0.01
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
C. CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
TOTAL SOLIDS %v = 9.53 %
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. i [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] oS
CONCENTRATION(mg/1) i Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 300 (mg/1) y 23
CALCIUM (Ca) 800 (mg/1) i 20 = _ 40.0
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 3,000 (mg/1) i 12 = 250.0
SAR = 1.08
12of25

LANID APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 13 (4/91)
D.PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND
APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TKN
AMMONIA-N
N04-NO3-N
MINERALIZATION RATE
pagamblavWx
5,200
100
221
(MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can
be used for domestic wastewater treatment residuals. If actual values are
established, attach the documentation: The default values are as follows): _
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific
default value chosen is appropriate.)
(Complete the following calculations for only the application method proposed)
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + Sx(NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN=
0.30X(
5,200 .100
) + .5x 1( 00 ) + 221
PAN =
1801
(PPM DRY
WEIGHT)
RB
*All residuals will be surface applied to pasture and hayland
PAN FOR SUB SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= x( - )+( )+
PAN = (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
13 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 14 (4/91)
TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR
2,142 lbs PAN
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 595+/-
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (m,/kp DRY NN't.) x 2000 POUNDS /TON
PER DRY TON 1,000,000
= PAN (PPNI DRY WEIGHT) x .002
3.60 POUNDS/TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (POUNDS/TON) x TOTAL TONS OF
RESIDUAL
= 3.60 lbs/ton PAN x
595 DT
2,142 POUNDS
DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY
OVER TIME, THE AMOUNT OF NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN
YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN INTO
CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE
SUBSEQUENT YEARS. THIS BEING THE CASE PLEASE ATTACH AN
EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON LOADING RATES.
SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 125 POUNDS
CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
CROP(S) N-UPTAKE OF CROP
LBS/ACRE
Fescue 250 LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used:
Accepted Uptake rates taken from the existing permit
14of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 15 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABON'L•'
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = NI,AX, TOTAL LBS. OF AVATLABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN DEEDED FOR CROP*
2,142 lbs PAN=250 lbs PAN/Acre*
8.57 ACRES
*Note: All currently permitted sites are in fescue hay or pasture production
' THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN
THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR
CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE
FORMAT OUTLINED ABOVE.
E. ANNUAL CADMIUM CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA
REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR CADMIUM FROM B.
ABOVE = 0.001 lbs/ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
595
TOTAL CADMIUM IN POUNDS = CADMIUM (POUNDSI TON) x TOTAL
TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
0.001 lbs/ton x
595 DT
0.595 POUNDS
MAXIMUM CADMIUM LOADING RATE AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR
257.3-5 IS 0.5 KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.445 POUNDS PER
ACRE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL
CADMIUM CALCULATED ABOVE:
15 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 16 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL POIINDS OF CAD?N1TUNI
0.445 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
0.595 lbs U40.445 lbs Cd/Ac
1.34 ACRES
F. DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND
APPLICATION BY COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND
THAT NEEDED FOR CADMIUM. WHAT IS THE LIMITING FACTOR:
PAN X OR CADMIUM . HOW MANY ACRES ARE NEEDED?
8.57 _bW MANY ACRES —LAND APPLICATION ARE AVAILABLE?
478.s F THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
AZRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND
WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN
ONE RESIDUAL OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET
THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO
ONE POINT.
G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE
LIFETIME HEAVY METAL LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED
THE FOLLOWING FOR THE CORRESPONDING CATION
EXCHANGE CAPACITIES (CEC).
Pammetcr
CEC < 5
CEC 5-15
CEC > 15
Lead (lbs/acre)
500
1000
2000
Zinc Obs/acre)
250
500
1000
Copper Obs/acre)
125
250
500
Nickel Obs/acre)
125
250
500
Cadmium Obs/acre)
4.5
.9
18
SITE LIFE FOR THE SITE COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION THAT HAS
THE LOWEST CEC
THE SITE LIFE IS DETERMINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS
THAT THE SITE WITH THE LOWEST CEC CAN RECEIVE THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT
EXCEEDING THE ABOVE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE
METALS COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
16 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 17 (4/91)
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.01 lb s /ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr*
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR =0.01 lbs/ton x10.0 tons/AC/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SI M CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE__( 500 lbs/Ac
( 0.1 lbs/Ac/Yr )
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
5000 YEARS
*Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
Assume all CEC's < 5 metq/100 g
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL =
0.14 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE NEAR = 0.14 lb s / ton x 10. 0 tons /AC /Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFE-MAE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 250 lbs/Ac _
( 1.4 lbs/Ac/Yr )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
118.5
YEARS
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 0.12 lbs /ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
n12 lbs/t
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.i 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
SITE LIFE = LIFEMTE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE__( 125 lbs/Ac _ ' 104 YEARS
( 1.2 lbs/Ac/Yr )
17 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 18 (4/91)
4. SITE LIFE BASED ON i\ICKEL
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.07 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.07 lbslt x 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE-_( 125 lbs/Ac )_ = 178.5 YEARS
( 0.7 lbs/Ac/Yr )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.001 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR 0001 lbs . /ion 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
SITE 7 JFE = LIFE M,4EE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON STIE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 4.5 lbs /Ac
( 0.01 lbs/Ac/Yr )
450 YEARS
COMPARE THE FIVE METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL
THAT SPILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST SITE LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS Copper
AND THE SITE LIFE IS 104
YEARS. *Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr of residual
Assume all CEC' s are < 5 meq / 100 g
6. Site Life Based on Aluminum
Pounds per ton of Aluminum in residual = 128.0 lbs/ton
Pounds of aluminum applied per acre per year = 1,280 lbs/Ac/Yr
Site LIfe = 15,000 lbs/Ac* = 11.7 years
1,280 lbs/Ac/Yr
*No current limits on aluminum loadings - 15,000 lbs/Ac chosen as conservative
loadings.
18of25

APPENDIX I
RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSES REPORTS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
EQUALIZATION BASIN RESIDUAL SOLIDS
WATER TREATMENT PLANT BASIN RESIDUAL SOLIDS

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS

CITY OF MT. HOLLY
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
SLUDGEANALYSIS
Sludge Type: Wastewater Treatment Plant
Date: 02/17/94
% Solids: 2.83
PH: 8.5
........>>: ar.a eter
o :::...:;.PP.
D ,...Wer ht::::::::<>:
/o :x.1.0:>:
Pourr'ds ,.:,.
PPM`x.: 0
Nitrogen TKN
6.01
60100.00
120.200
Phosphorus
1.86
18600.00
37.200
Potassium
0.20
2000.00
4.000
PAN (injected)*
2.990
29900.00
59.800
PAN (surface)*
2.160
21600.00
...........................................................
_.._ _. ..............
Ammonia Nitrogen
1.66
16600.00
33.200
Calcium
6.13
61300.00
122.600
Magnesium
0.26
2600.00
5.200
Sodium
0.94
9400.00
18.800
Sulfur
0.42
4200.00
8.400
Calcium Carbonate E .
4.99
49900.00
99.800
Nitrate N
- -
250.00
0.500
Nitrite N
--
1.65
0.003
Copper
- -
400.00
0.800
Cadmium
--
3.00
0.006
Chromium
--
1550.00
3.100
Lead
- -
100.00
0.200
Nickel
- -
95.00
0.190
Zinc
- -
650.00
1.300
Chloride
- -
2300.00
4.600
Aluminum
- -
11500.00
23.000
Arsenic
- -
2.27
0.005
Mercury
- -
1.29
0.003
M01 bdenum
- -
8.00
0.016
Selenium
--
1.73
0.003
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N)+Ammonia N+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (6.01-1.66) + 1.66 + 0.025 + 0.000 = 2.990 % PAN
Surface Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN-Ammonia N) + (0.5) (Ammonia N)+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (6.01-1.66) + (0.5) (1.66) + 0.025 + 0.00 = 2.160 % PAN
30-Mar-94

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
R036 1.21. ACCOUNT 45594 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER (b
S &ME ( MOUNT HOLLY)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
P 0 BOX 38728
GRC. EN(3BORO NC: 27438-8720
LAB Nl.1MF;f.-::R = 40439
SAMf''I...E ID = MT F'IC)I...LY WW'TP DICIEST
RESULT
PARAMETER
PO #2909 JOB 1588-93-005
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT ANALYSIS
(MO/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST DATE
ROB WILLCOX
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DATE REPORTED
02/14/94
02/17/94
METHOD REFERENCE
----------------------
SOLIDS 2 . F-3 3 28300 100 JCM 02/14/94 EPA 160. 3
011 I H tWEN (TKN) 6.01 60100 100 L..DR 02/15/94 EPA 351.3
PHOSPHORUS 1.86 1.8600 100 JCM 02/15/94 EPA 365.2
POTASSIUM 0..20 2000 100 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7610
SULFUR 0.42 4200 100 JCM 02/15/94 EPA 375.4
(.:AI...(.i.IUM 6.1.3 61.300 �100 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7140
MAGNESIUM 0.26 2600 100 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7450
f:iC1X:l:l HM '� i ��1 '! ; 1j 94 9400 100 DCN 02/15/94 EPA 273.1
ALUMINUM � ',f'� (; ' i I is � � /15/94 SW 846-7020
I � 11,.,U0 10 DCN 02 � �
COPPER ; ; �i� 400 1 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7210
ZINC �' jil 650 1 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7950.
AMMONIA N� il%)('. E.N ; l.1)6 1.6600 100 LDR 02/15/94 EPA 350.2
NITRATE:. NWRC)(. EN :; 250 10 JCM 02/15/94 EPA 352.1
CADMIUM 3.0 0.5 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7130
CHROMIUM 1550 5 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7190
NICK 95 5 DCN .02/15/94 SW 846-7520
LEAD 100 5 DCN 02/15/94 SW 846-7420
ARSENIC 2.27 0.01 DCN 02/16/94 SW 846r7061
AI...L VAI: UE S EXCEPT f:iC)I..,:I:DS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS.G c-PA X.H HU 0/)P.NORMA4JON ES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work• the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 a [phone]
Fax No. (804) 27UC446
R036--1. ?1. ACCOUNT 45594 PAGE 2 go
REPORT NUMBER
S&ME (MOUNT HOLLY)
)
AT'T'N: RICK BAKER
P O BOX 3B728
GRI:-ENSF.;ORO NC 27438-872i3
LAB NUMBER = 40439
SAMPLF ID = MT HOLLY WWTP DIGEST
PO *2909 JOLT 1588-93-005
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
ROB WILLCOX
DATE SAMPLED
HATE RECEIVED 02/14/94
DATE REPORTED 02/17/94
RESULT
RESULT
LIMIT
ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
( % )
(MG/KG)
(MG/KG)
ANALYST
IDATE
METHOD REFERENCE
------------------------
MERCURY
1.29
0.01
DCN
02/16/94
SW 846-7471 1
'.: E= 1 I.IM
1.73
0.01
DCN
02/16/94
SW 846-7741
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
8.50
KHM
02/15/94
EPA 150.1
CALCIUM CARBONATE:. E Q
4.99
49900
100
LDR
-02/15/94
ASTM C602
ORGANIC NITROGEN
4.35
43500
LDR
02/15/94
CALCULATED
Ai(.lLYDDE:.NUM
8
_100
5
BL.T
02/16/94
SW 846-6010
(.;I'l1...ORIDE
2300
1
LDR
02/15/94
SM 4500-CL
NITRITE:: NIT1''t(.1(:;I::N
1.65
0.01.
LDR
02/15/94
EPA 354.1
AI...L VAI...I.TI"S EXCEPT SOLIDS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS,2 C' NORM CS'L H. CHU A JONES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

Enseco East
Enseco
A Corning Company
JAN 15, 1993
Mr. Rob Willcox
S&ME, Inc.
135-C Montlieu Avenue
P.O. Box 18169
Greensboro, North Carolina 27419
Dear Mr. Willcox:
Enclosed are the results of the analyses performed on the one soil sample
from Mt. Holly WWTP TCLP (Enseco-East Project No. 26471; Purchase Order
No. 1625). This sample was received under chain of custody at Enseco-East
Laboratory on December 18, 1992. A brief description of the Quality
Assurance/Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is contained
within the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results
and should be considered an integral part of this report.
Please refer to this project by the Enseco-East Laboratory Project Number
to help expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any
questions or concerns that you may have.
Sincerely,
E -EAST LABO TORY
Alicia C. Pirrocco
Program Administrator
Enc.
lc
Enseco Incorporated
2200 Cottontail Lane
Somerset, New Jersey 08875-6745
908/469-5800 Fax:.[phone]

�. Eseco
A Comore Comoam,
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
To ensure data quality, an extensive QA/QC program has been implemented at
Enseco-East which incorporates the following controls (as applicable).
Reagent or analytical blanks are analyzed to assess the level of
contamination which exists in the analytical system. An analytical blank,
analyzed with every batch of samples, consists of reagents specific. to the
method. This blank is carried through every aspect of the procedure,
including preparation, cleanup, and analysis. Ideally, the concentration
of an analyte in the blank is below the reporting limit for that analyte.
However, some common laboratory solvents and metals are difficult to
eliminate to the part -per -billion levels commonly reported in environmental
analyses.
Duplicate Control Samples (DCS) are used to monitor the laboratory's
day-to-day performance of routine analytical methods. A DCS consists of a
standard, control matrix which is spiked with a group of target compounds
representative of the method analytes.. The DCS is analyzed with
environmental samples tG provide evidence that the laboratory is performing
the method within accepted QC guidelines.
A DCS has been established for most routine analytical methods.
Reagent water is used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous
samples. The DCS compounds are spiked into reagent water and carried
through the appropriate steps of the analysis. As stated in SW-846
(third edition), a universal blank matrix does not exist for solid samples
and therefore no matrix is used. The DCS for solid samples consists of the
appropriate steps of the analysis. The data thus obtained are used to set
the DCS control limits. The control limits for accuracy are based on the
historical average recovery of the DCS plus or minus three standard
deviation units. The control limits for precision are based on the
historical relative percent difference (RPD) and range from zero (no
difference between duplicate samples) to the average RPD plus three standard
deviation units.
Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of
interest in chemical behavior but which are not normally found in
environmental samples. Surrogates are routinely added to samples requiring
GC/MS analysis to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the
analysis. Results are reported in terms of percent recovery.

��Enseco
A C:umine Cumpanv
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The method number provided on each data report sheet refers to a
publication originating from a regulatory or standard -setting organization.
In general, the methods employed are those specified by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and other state and federal agencies. In cases where an
approved regulatory method does not exist, a method developed by Enseco will
be employed to meet the specific needs of the client. The methods commonly
employed by Enseco are based on methods from the following references.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020. Cincinnati, OH, March 1983.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods. (SW-846); Washington, D.C. November 1986.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods for the Determination of Organic
Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water. Cincinnati, OH,
September 1986.
Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the analysis of Pollutants Under
the Clean Water Act, 40 CFR, Part 136; Federal Register, (1984).
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water
Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater, 16th edition. Washington, D.C., April 1985.
EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocols for the analysis of organic
and inorganic hazardous substances.

Eseco
A Coming Comvanv
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION
for
S&ME, Inc.
Sampled
Received
Lab ID
Client ID
Matrix
Date Time
Date
026471-0001-SA
MT HOLLY WWTP
SOIL
17 DEC 92
18 DEC 92
026471-0001-MS
MT HOLLY WWTP MATRIX SPIKE
SOIL
17 DEC 92
18 DEC 92
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE BLANK
LEACHATE
17 DEC 92
18 DEC 92

. Eseco
Volatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic
mist
A Corrine Company
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8240
Client Name:
S&ME, Inc.
Client ID:
MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID:
026471-0001-SA
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Leached:
21 DEC 92
Matrix:
SOIL
Received: 18 DEC 92
Prepared:
29 DEC 93
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Analyzed:
29 DEC 93
Reporting
Parameter Result Units Limit
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate
Recovery
Toluene-d8
102
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene
104
%
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
104
%
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Kelvin Wang Approved By: Khaja Eazazuddin

s ,Eseco
Volatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic
List
A Corning Company
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8240
Client Name:
S&ME, Inc.
Client ID:
LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID:
026471-0002-BL
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Leached:
21 DEC 92
Matrix:
LEACHATE
Received: 18 DEC 92
Prepared:
29 DEC 93
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Analyzed:
29 DEC 93
Reporting
Parameter Result Units Limit
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate
Recovery
Toluene-d8
107
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene
107
%
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
109
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Kelvin Wang Approved By: Khaja Eazazuddin

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
QC
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
TEST
8240-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
,;Eseco
A Coming Company
QC
LOT
23 DEC 92-D

.. I,Enseco
.% Cumin¢ Comoam•
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration
Matrix
Amount
%
Analyte
Sample
Spike
Spiked
Rec
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Benzene
ND
0.27
0.25
107
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.24
0.25
95
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.26
0.25
105
Chloroform
ND
0.25
0.25
100
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.27
0.25
108
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.23
0.25
93
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
0.24
0.25
98
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.26
0.25
103
Trichloroethene
ND
0.26
0.25
105
Vinyl Chloride
ND
0.23
0.25
91
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

�Enseco
A Comme Comoam•
QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Laboratory
QC
Lot
Number
QC
Run
Number
Sample dumber
QC Matrix
QC Category
(DCS)
(SCS/BLANK)
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-D
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-0
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-D
29
DEC
92-A

DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Category: VOA-MS-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D
Concentration Units: MG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Eseco
.i Comme Comoanc
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 OCS2 AVG OCS Limits OCS Limit
0.050
0.0514
0.0498
0.0506
101
-61-145
3.2
14
0.050
0.0486
0.0475
0.0480
96
71-120
2.3
14
0.050
0.0540
0.0516
0.0528
106
76-127
4.r
11
0.050
0.0494
0.0477
0.0486
97
76-125
3.5
13
0.050
0.0448
0.0443
0.0446
89
75-130
1.1
13
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Category: VOA-MS-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run:
Concentration Units: mg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
Concentration
Spiked Measured
29 DEC 92-A
0.250 0.260
0.250 0.257
0.250 0.257
Accuracy(%)
SCS Limits
104 70-121
103 86-115
103 88-110
��Enseco
h Cumme Comoanv
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

y: Enseco
A Comme Comvanc
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025"
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
NO
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
NO
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
NO
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
NO
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.)
Analyte
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D
Vinyl Chloride
Reporting
Result Units Limit
QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
ND mg/L 0.050
Enseco
A Comm; Comoam•

Eseco
' Semivoiatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic List A CummK wmpam•
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8270
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA Sampled: 17 DEC 92 Leached: 21 DEC 92
Matrix: SOIL Received: 18 DEC 92 Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92 Analyzed: 09 JAN 93
Reporting
Parameter Result Units Limit
m & p-Cresol(s)
0.13
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenoi
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5
40 %
2-Fluorobiphenyl
32 %
Terphenyl-d14
35 %
Phenol-d5
33 %
2-Fluorophenol
36 %
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
50 %
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Todd Fenton Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

. a:•Eseco
Semivolatile
Organics - Toxicity
Characteristic List
A Coming Company
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8270
Client Name:
S&ME, Inc.
Client ID:
LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID:
026471-0002-BL
Sampled: 17
DEC 92 Leached:
21 DEC 92
Matrix:
LEACHATE
Received: 18
DEC 92 Prepared:
28 DEC 92
Authorized: 18
DEC 92 Analyzed:
07 JAN 93
Reporting
Parameter Result Units Limit
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5
74 %
2-Fluorobiphenyl
59 %
Terphenyl-d14
60 %
Phenol-d5
59 %
2-Fluorophenol
68 %
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
85 %
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Todd Fenton Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
by GC/MS
TEST
8270-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
., s; Eseco
A Comme Company
ROT
23 DEC 02-A

��%Enseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration
Matrix Amount %
Analyte Sample Spike Spiked Rec
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
m & p-Cresol(s)
0.13
0.84
1.0
71
o-Cresol
NO
0.35
0.50
70
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NO
0.14
0.25
58
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
NO
0.17
0.25
68
Hexachlorobenzene
NO
0.14
0.25
56
Hexachlorobutadiene
NO
0.16
0.25
64
Hexachloroethane
NO
0.14
0.25
57
Nitrobenzene
NO
0.18
0.25
73
Pentachlorophenol
NO
0.45
0.50
89
Pyridine
NO
0.14
0.25
56
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
NO
0.33
0.50
66
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
NO
0.35
0.50
70
NO = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Laboratory
Sample Number QC Matrix QC Category
026471-0001-SA LEACHATE BNA-TL
026471-0001-MS LEACHATE BNA-TL
026471-0002-BL LEACHATE BNA-TL
QC Lot Number
(DCS)
23 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A
S. Enseco
A Cumin¢ Cum Done
QC Run Number
(SCS/BLANK)
28 DEC 92-A
28 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A

DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
Concentration
Spiked Measured
DCS1 DCS2 AVG
_. Eseco
A Corning Comvamv
Accuracy Precision
Average(%) (RPD)
DCS Limits DCS Limit
Pyridine
0.050
0.0230
0.0275
0.0252
51
-20-200
18
50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.050
0.0437
0.0384
0.0410
82
33-128
13
18
2-Methylphenol
0.10
0.0848
0.0754
0.0801
80
46-110
12
17
m & p-Cresol(s)
1.0
0.144
0.133
0.138
14
38-102
7.9
15
Hexachloroethane
0.050
0.0386
0.0328
0.0357
71
13-120
16
26
Nitrobenzene
0.050
0.0460
0.0387
0.0424
85
41-127
17
16
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.050
0.0409
0.0340
0.0374
75
26-126
18
35
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.10
0.0909
0.0823
0.0866
87
47-110
9.9
35
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.10
0.0837
0.0756
0.0796
80
41-116
10
24
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.050
0.0407
0.0400
0.0404
81
11-110
1.7
21
Hexachlorobenzene
0.050
0.0381
0.0355
0.0368
74
32-122
7.1
17
Pentachlorophenol
0.10
0.0451
0.0203
0.0327
33
9-103
76
50
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Commc Comvam•
SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Concentration Accuracy(%)
Spiked Measured SCS Limits
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run:
28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units:
mg/L
Nitrobenzene-d5
0.100
0.0555
56
36-114
2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.100
0.0461
46
43-116
Terphenyl-d14
0.100
0.0529
53
33-141
2-Fluorophenol
0.200
0.0717
36
21-100
Phenol-d5
0.200
0.0463
23
10- 94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.200
0.131
66
10-123
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run:
23 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units:
mg/L
Nitrobenzene-d5
0.100
0.0591
59
36-114
2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.100
0.0622
62
43-116
Terphenyl-d14
0.100
0.0626
63
33-141
2-Fluorophenol
0.200
0.0890
44
21-100
Phenol-d5
0.200
0.0521
26
10- 94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.200
0.143
72
10-123
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Eseco
A Coming Cumpanv
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050-'
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A QC Run:
23 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050

,;.Eseco
A Comme Compam•
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.)
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 23 DEC 92-A
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050--
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050

TCLP Organochlorine Pesticides
Toxicity Characteristic .Leaching Procedure
Method 8080
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Surrogate
Dibutyl chlorendate
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Amanda McFadden
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result Units
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND ND mg/L
Recovery
69 %
16 2;Enseco
A Coming Company
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 05 JAN 93
Reporting
Limit
0.00050
0.0050
0.0010
0.00050
0.0050
0.050
Approved By: Dan Segal

=�:,.Eseco
TCLP Organochlorine Herbicides - Method 8150 Modified A Coming Cumpanv
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8150
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Surrogate
DCAA
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result Units
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Recovery
65 %
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 04 JAN 93
Reporting
Limit
0.0050
0.0010
Approved By: Dan Segal

TCLP Organochlorine Pesticides
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8080
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Surrogate
Dibutyl chlorendate
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Amanda McFadden
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Recovery
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 31 DEC 92
Reporting
Limit
0.00050
0.0050
0.0010
0.00050
0.0050
0.050
Approved By: Dan Segal
Fmeco
A Coming Company

,Enseco
TCLP Organochlorine Herbicides
- Method 8150
Modified
A CornmK Lompanv
Toxicity
Characteristic
beaching Procedure
Method 8150
Client dame:
SO E, Inc.
Client ID:
LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID:
026471-0002-BL
Sampled:
17 DEC 92
Leached:
21 DEC 92
Matrix:
LEACHATE
Received:
18 DEC 92
Prepared:
28 DEC 92
Authorized:
18 DEC 92
Analyzed:
03 JAN 93
Parameter
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Surrogate
DCAA
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu
Reporting
Result
Units
Limit
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010
Recovery
78
%
Approved By: Dan Segal

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
MATRIX SPIKE
TEST
8080-TCLP-SL
8150-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
026471-0001-MS
y�Esec o
A Coming Comvanv
LOT
28 DEC 92-A
18 DEC 92-A

Erlseco
A Cumme Cumnanv
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Anaiyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Concentration
Matrix Amount
Sample Spike Spiked
Rec
ND
0.0022
0.0025
86
ND
0.0022
0.0025
87
NO
0.0041
0.0050
82
ND
0.019
0.025
77
ND
0.0066
0.0050
131
ND
0.00089
0.0010
89
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

-1'�zEseco
A Coming Comoanv
QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Laboratory
QC
Lot
Number
QC
Run
Number
Sample Number
QC Matrix
QC Category
(DCS)
(SCS/BLANK).
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A

DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Analyte
Category: 8080-TCLP
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Endrin
Methoxychlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Category: 8150-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: ug/l
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
2,4-D
$:Eseco
A Coming Comvam•
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
0.0025
0.00241
0.00254
0.00248
99
-19-140
5.3
40
0.0025
0.00272
0.00288
0.00280
112
34-111
5.7
40
0.0025
0.00255
0.00270
0.00262
105
30-147
5:7
40
0.025
0.0255
0.0267
0.0261
104
50-150
4.6
50
0.0025
0.00256
0.00269
0.00262
105
37-142
5.0
40
1.0 0.998 0.834 0.916 92 19-154 18 50
5.0 6.54 6.87 6.70 134 5-140 4.9 38
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

A Coming Comvam•
SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Concentration Accuracy(%)
Analyte Spiked Measured SCS Limits
Category: 8150-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: ug/L
DCAA 25.0 21.1 84 60-148
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Analyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene:
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Result
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Resorting
Units Limit
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010.,
ND
mg./L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
- �: Enseco
A Cumme Como nv

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC (cont.)
Analyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Result
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Reporting
Units Limit
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010-'
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
-Enseco
A Coming Company

c iV VZ 4.•ZL1 .0 I"IJLI.V. 1. MVIU Mill I L.1/
.UVIU.. l II f.. .Ir G/ c.
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Metals
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID; MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab 1D; 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter Result
Arsenic
ND
Barium
0.23
Cadmium
ND
Chromium
NO
Selenium
ND
Lead
NO
Mercury
ND
Silver
NO
NO - Not Detected
Reported By: Michael Lifton
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Reporting Analytica'
Units Limit Method
my/L 0.10 6010
m9/L 0.010 6010
mg/L 0.0050 6010
mg/L 0.010 6010
mg1L 0.037 Solo
mg/L 0.050 60I0
mg/L 0.00020 7470
m9/L 0.010 Solo
Ipached: 21 DEC 92
Approved By: John Minervini
Prepared
Analyzed
Date
Date
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
28 DEC
92
29
DFC
92
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
Z9 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
Z8 DEC
92
29
DEC
92

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Metals
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Mercury
Silver
Result
ND
0.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Michael Lifton
�Enseco
A Coming Company
Sampled: 17 DEC
92
Leached:
21 DEC
92
Received:
18 DEC
92
Prepared:
See
Below
Authorized:
18 DEC
92
Analyzed:
See
Below
Reporting
Analytical
Prepared
Analyzed
Units
Limit
Method
Date
Date
mg/L
0.10
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.0050
6010
28
DEC'92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.20
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.050
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.00020
7470
29
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92

General Chemistry
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Eseco
A Coming Compam•
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 DEC 92 Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below
Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed
Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date
Corrosivity 7.5 units 0.010 9045 NA 30 DEC 92
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Joanne Acevedo Approved By: Deanna Doster

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Metals
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Mercury
Silver
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Michael Lifton
A Coming Company
Sampled: 17 DEC
92
Leached:
21 DEC
92
Received:
18 DEC
92
Prepared:
See
Below
Authorized:
18 DEC
92
Analyzed:
See
Below
Reporting
Analytical
Prepared
Analyzed
Units
Limit
Method
Date
Date
mg/L
0.10
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.0050
6010
28
DEC"92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.20
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.050
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.00020
7470
29
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28
DEC
92
29
DEC
92
Approved By: John Minervini

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Analysis and
QC
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
MATRIX SPIKE
Preparation
TEST
HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
ICP-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY,
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
026471-0001-MS
-Eseco
A Coming Company
QC
LOT
29 DEC 92-A
29 DEC 92-C

;Eseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Concentration
Matrix
Amount
%
Analyte
Sample
Spike
Spiked
Rec
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Mercury
ND
0.00087
0.0010
87
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Arsenic
ND
4.6
5.0
91
Barium
0.23
17.8
20.0
88
Cadmium
ND
0.56
0.50
111
Chromium
NO
2.3
2.0
114
Selenium
ND
0.63
0.50
126
Lead
NO
5.0
5.0
101
Silver
ND
0.45
0.50
90
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Preparation Department
Laboratory
Sample Number QC Matrix
026471-0001-SA AQUEOUS
QC Category
CORR-PH-A
QC Lot Number
(DCS)
30 DEC 92-A
-�., Eseco
A Comme Comvam•
QC Run Number
(SCSJBLANK)

.Enseco
A Coming Company
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Metals Preparation Department
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
OCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
Category: CORR-PH-A
Matrix: AQUEOUS
QC Lot: 30 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: units
Corrosivity 7.00 6.94 6.95 6.94 99 -90-110 0.1 10
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Laboratory
Sample Number
026471-0001-SA
026471-0001-SA
026471-0001-MS
026471-0001-MS
026471-0002-BL
026471-0002-BL
QC Matrix QC Category
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
QC Lot Number
(DCS)
29 DEC 92-A
28 DEC 92-A
29 DEC 92-A
29 DEC 92-C
29 DEC 92-A
28 DEC 92-A
S Eseco
A Coming Cumpanv
QC
Run
Number
(SCS/BLANK)
29
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
29
DEC
92-A
29
DEC
92-C
29
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

_/,Eseco
A Coming Company
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 OCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
Category: HG-CVAA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
Mercury
0.001
0.000910
0.000950
0.000930
93
.80-120
4.3
20
Category:
ICP-TL
Matrix:
LEACHATE
QC Lot:
28 DEC 92-A
Concentration
Units: mg/L
Arsenic
2.0
2.06
2.07
2.06
103
80-120
0.4
20
Barium
-2.0
1.90
1.90
1.90
95
80-120
0.1
20
Cadmium
0.05
0.0483
0.0502
0.0492
98
80-120
3.9
20
Chromium
0.2
0.200
0.201
0.200
100
80-120
0.9
20
" Lead
0.5
0.518
0.522
0.520
104
80-120
0.8
20
Silver
0.05
0.0509
0.0501
0.0505
101
60-120
1.6
20
Selenium
0.5
0.519
0.528
0.524
105
80-120
1.6
20
Category:
ICP-TL
Matrix:
LEACHATE
QC Lot:
29 DEC 92-C
Concentration
Units: mg/L
Arsenic
2.0
2.12
2.07
2.10
105
80-120
2.2
20
Barium
2.0
1.92
1.90
1.91
95
80-120
0.9
20
Cadmium
0.05
0.0510
0.0495
0.0502
101
80-120
3.0
20
Chromium
0.20
0.204
0.202
0.203
101
80-120
1.4
20
Lead
0.50
0.537
0.519
0.528
106
80-120
3.5
20
Silver
0.05
0.0515
0.0507
0.0511
102
60-120
1.6
20
Selenium
0.5
0.514
0.496
0.505
101
80-120
3.5
20
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Silver
ND
mg/L
0.10
NO
mg/L
0.010
NO
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.010
NO
mg/L
0.20
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.010
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-C QC Run: 29 DEC 92-C
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Silver
ND
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.20
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.010
Eseco
A Coming Companv

Vmeco
A Coming Companv
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation (cone.)
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury
ND
mg/L
0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Arsenic
ND
mg/L
0.10
Barium
ND
mg/L
0.010
Cadmium
NO
mg/L
0.0050
Chromium
ND
mg/L
0.010
Selenium
ND
mg/L
0.20
Lead
ND
mg/L
0.050
Silver
NO
mg/L
0.010

�,-, jQpct
L Gm _ ipany
RECORD ENS-1045.c
tR013 WILLOOx
COMPANY
5 IYI E, S N C.
I��, ADDREss
C IAONI-LJEu Avr-
t
(5eFEAJ580RQ. M.C. 2,74lq
NECT NAME
/�7./ocL LAND i�PAi•i�A naN
APLER NAME.
-RO8 `')IILLco v
THOD OF SHIPMENT AIR BILL NUMBER COOLER N
FED CX /)
I i
v
(9/,7) 655 - 7547
P.O. NUMBER
1(o25
PHONENUMBER
(,?Iq a5b- 7541
UMBER CUSTODY SEAL NUMBER
g 4387G
ANALYSES
sf Fk- co
2200 Cottontali Lane
Somerset NJ 06876
(008) 409-5W0
ERGO
205 Alewife Brook Parkway
Cambridge MA 02138
(6M 651-3111
ENSECO
COMMENTS
IVA W
An.
EmomommommKI
7
mmmmm
m■■mmm
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■gym■■■■■■mmmmm
■■■■■■■■■■■■
mmmmm
SAMPLE RECEIVED BY'..4
®■
RECEIVED AT ENSECO

EQUALIZATION BASIN RESIDUAL SOLIDS

CITY OF MT. HOLLY
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
SLUDGE ANALYSIS
Sludge Type: Wastewater Treatment Plant
Date: 02/17/94
% Solids: 1.34 Equalization Basin
PH: 7.4
ma e.....
: ::>� ,
::>:
:....::>
: /
M:We h.::PdsD::r
/o <x
:.
:::T .n:>:::>:::>.
Nitrogen TKN
4.48
44800.00
89.600
Phosphorus
0.70
7000.00
14.000
Potassium
0.13
1300.00
2.600
PAN (injected)*
1.730
17300.00
34.600
PAN surface
1.475
14750.00
, .:
.........................................................
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.51
5100.00
10.200
Calcium
0.62
6200.00
12.400
Magnesium
0.19
1900.00
3.800
Sodium
2.33
23300.00
46.600
Sulfur
0.33
3300.00
6.600
Calcium Carbonate E .
0.37
3700.00
7.400
Nitrate N
- -
285.00
0.570
Nitrite N
- -
0.46
0.001
Copper
- -
820.00
1.640
Cadmium
--
4.00
0.008
Chromium
--
110.00
0.220
Lead
- -
90.00
0.180
Nickel
- -
40.00
0.080
Zinc
- -
1090.00
2.180
Chloride
- -
8340.00
16.680
Aluminum
- -
39400.00
78.800
Arsenic
- -
3.35
0.007
Mercury
- -
1.73
0.003
Mol bdenum
--
5.00
0.010
Selenium
--
1.29
0.003
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N)+Ammonia N+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (4.48- 0.51) + 0.51 + 0.029 + 0.000 = 1.730 % PAN
Surface Application:
(Mineralization Rate) (TKN -Ammonia N) + (0.5) (Ammonia N)+Nitrate N+Nitrite N = % PAN
(0.3) (4.48-0.51) + (0.5) (0.51) + 0.029 + 0.00 = 1.475 % PAN
30-Mar-94
111

^ /
" � � 8 EASTERN ����U�������N LABORATORIES, � �a m~ �~m�~�uu~wmw� ����nun����m~n��wm��m~ INC.mn���
7621 Whitep'ne Road w Richmond. Virginia 23237 m [phone]
\ Fax No. ��O��271-6446
R038-121 ACCOUNT 45594 ' '
PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER
S&ME (MOUNT HOLLY)
ATTMRICK BAKER
P O BOX 38728
GREENSBORONC 27438-8728
LAB NUMBER = 40440
SAMPLE ID = EQUALIZATION BASIN
RESULT
PARAMETER
--.... .... .... --------- --------
PO #2909 JOB 1588-93-005
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT ANALYSIS
(MG/K(3) (MG/KG) ANALYST DATE
------- ------- .... ... .... ...
--- -------
ROB WlLLCOX
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DHTE REPORTED
�m
02/14/94
O2/17/94
METHOD REFERENCE
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... ... .... ...
---'--'
SOLIDS
1^34
13400
100
JCM 02/14/94
EPA
160,3
NITROGEN (TKM)
4^48
44800
100
LDR 02/15/94
EpA
351,3
PHOSPHORUS
0^70`-
7000
100
JCM 02/15.94
EPA
365,2
POTASSIUM
0.13
1300
100
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7610
SULFUR
04-33
3300
100
JCM 02/15/94
EPA
375.4
CALCIUM
0^62
8200
100
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7140
MAGNESIUM
0^19
1900
100
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7450
SODIUM
2^33
23300
100
DCN 02/15/94
EPA
273.1
ALUMINUM
39400
10
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7020
COPPER
820
1
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7210
ZINC
1090
1
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7950
AMMONIA NITROGEN
0051
5100
100
L D R 02/15/94
EPA
350~2
NITRATE NITROGEN
285
10
JCM 02/15/94
352^1
CADMIUM
4^0
0^5
D(-'N 02/15/94
SW
846-7130
CHROMIUM
110
5
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7190
NICKEL
40
5
DCN 02/15/9'
SW
846-7520
LEAD `.
90
5
DCN 02/15/94
SW
846-7420
ARSE'_
3^35
0^0'1
DCN 02/16/94
SW
846-7061
ALL VALUES EXCEPT
SOLIDS ARE ON
A DRY WEIGHT
BASIS^
QP 4tp. �r 4(j
,
mur reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use mour clients, and may not bereproduced mwhole mmpart, nor
may any reference b"made mthe
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public
announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
cm»v,.om1or,

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
R():36 1.'1. ACCOUNT4i:iS'4 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER
S &ME:: ( MOUNT HOLLY)
ATTNI RICK BAILER
P 0 BOX 30728
GRE:.E::Nfal:t(:3RO NC 274::38-8728
LAB NUMBER .... 40440
f:ariwi r ID = EQUALIZATION ZA'T ION BASIN
RESHK I
PARAMF:'TI: R ( Y )
PO $2909 JOB 1588-93-005
SI...I.3I:GE:: ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT ANALYSIS
(MG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST DATE.
ROB WILLC:OX
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DATE REPORTED
METHOD REFERENCE
hil:::RT:`URY
1..73
0.01.
I:CN
02/1.6/94
SW
846-7471
SELENIUM
1.29
0.01.
I)C:N
02/16/94
SW
046--7741
PH ( STANDARD UNITS) 7.40
KHM
02/15/94
EPA
150.1
C:AI. C I I1" CARBONATE E? D 0.37
3700
1.00
LDR
02/15/94
ASTM
C602
ORGANIC NITROGEN 3.97
39700
1.00
LDR
02/15/94
CALCULATED
MOLYBDENUM M
15
`:;
EsLT
02/16/94
SW
046--6010
CHLORIDE
8340
1.
LDR
02/15/94
SM
4500—CL
NT.TRITE r,YTRcrGE::N
0.46
0.01.
LDR
02/15/94
EPA
354.1
H.
02/14/94
02/17/94
ALL VALUES EXCEPT ,.>(.TL.:I:Ia..t AEiI-: L:1N A IafiY WF.:::f.(3H'r' BASIS. (' J/./�'�;�(. v
'AUL.. C.' « H. . C:HU J' C , NORMAN JONES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior writion authorization. Copyright 1977

Farr
LABORA10RIES GROUP
Page 1
Received: 02/24/94
6661-A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 79110 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
ENRECO LAB REPORT Work Order # 94-02-051
02/24/94 09:42:26
REPORT S_& ME, INC. PREPARED ENRECO LABORATORIES
TO 3718 OLD BATTLE GROUND ROAD BY 6661-A CANYON DRIVE
GREENSBROUGH, NC 27410 AMARILLO, TEXAS 79110 C
ATTEN ROB WILCOX
•CLIENT SME INC 3 SAMPLES 1
COMPANY S & ME, INC.
FACILITY MT._ ]HOLLY WWTP-EQUALIZATION
BASIN
WORK ID MT HOLLY -EOUALI ZATION BASIN
TAKEN 2/9/94
TRANS HDL
TYPE LIQUID
P.O. #
INVOICE under separate cover
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
31 S94-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP
ATTEN CUSTOMER SERVICES
PHONE [phone]
TEST CODES
and NAMES used on
CN REC
REACTIVITY (CYANIDE)
42
IGNT
IGNITABILITY/SOLID
42
PH C
CORROSIVITY PH
42
S2 REC
REACTIVITY/SULFIDE
42
TCLP M
TCLP METAL ANALYSIS
30
TCLP O
TCLP ORGANICS
30
TCL EL
TCLP L-L EXTRACTION
30
TCL EM
TCLP EXTRACTION
30
TCL EV
TCLP ZHE EXTRACTION
30
CERTIFIED BY
CONTACT MARK KRAUSE
this workorder

r'' 21-1t1 r
UZBORATORIES GROUP 6661-A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 79110 Telephone [phone] Facsimile 1806) 352-6454
Page 2 ENRECO LAB REPORT Work Order # 94-02-051
Received: 02/14/94 Results by Sample
SAMPLE ID 894-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP SAMPLE # 01 FRACTIONS: A,B
Date & Time Collected 02/09/94 14:30:00 Category
CN_REC <0.02 IGNT PASS PH_C 7.1 82_REC <10
MG/L PASS / FAIL UNITS MG/L

I %MMir 'L:■ ■ j
LABOmiUKIES 6HUUP 6661 A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 79110 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
Page 3 ENRECO LAB REPORT Work Order # 94-02-051
Received: 02/14/94 Results by Sample
SAMPLE ID 894-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP FRACTION 01A TEST CODE TCLP M NAME TCLP METAL ANALYSIS 30
Date & Time Collected 02/09/94 14:30:00 Category
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT UNITS
ARSENIC
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
BARIUM
<0..1
0.10
MG/L
CADMIUM-
0.22
0.05
MG/L
CHROMIUM
<0.05
0.05
MG/L
LEAD
<0.05
0.05
MG/L
MERCURY
<0.002
0.002
MG/L
SELENIUM
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
SILVER
0.11
0.05
MG/L
Notes and Definitions
for this Report:
DATE RUN 02/17/94
ANALYST JLM

IABORAiORIES GROUP 6661-A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 79110 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
Page 4 ENRECO LAB
REPORT
Work
Order # 94-02-051
Received: 02/14/94 Results
by sample
SAMPLE ID 094-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP FRACTION 01A TEST CODE
TCLP O NAME TCLP ORGANICS 30
Date & Time
Collected 02/09/94
14:30:00
Category
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT UNITS
BENZENE
<0.005
0.065
MG/L
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
<0.005
0.005
MG/L
CHLORDANE
<0.03
0.03
MG/L
CHLOROBENZENE
<0.005'
0.005
MG/L
CHLOROFORM
<0.005
0.005
MG/L
CRESOL(O,M,P)
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
2,4-D
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<0.005
0. 005
MG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<0.005
0.005
MG/L
1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE
<0.005
0.005
MG/L
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
ENDRIN
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
HEPTACHLOR
<0.008
0.008
MG/L
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
LINDANE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
METHOXYCLOR
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
<0.02
0.02
MG/L
NITROBENZENE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
PYRIDINE
<0.05
0.05
MG/L
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
<0.005
0.005
MG/L
TOXAPHENE
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
0.11
0.005
MG/L
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
2,4,5-TP(SILVEX)
<0.1
0.10
MG/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
<0.01
0.01
MG/L
Notes and
Definitions for this Report:
EXTRACTED
02/18/94

LABORATORIES GROUP 6661-A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 791 10 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
Page 5 ENRECO LAB REPORT Work Order # 94-02-051
Received: 02/14/94 Results by Sample Continued From Above
SAMPLE ID 894-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP FRACTION 01A TEST CODE TCLP O NAME TCLP ORGANICS 30
Date & Time Collected 02/09/94 14:30:00 Category
DATE RUN 02/22/94
ANALYST LLM

LABORATORIES GROUP 6661-A Canyon Drive Amarillo, Texas 79110 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
?age 6 ENRECO LAB REPORT Work Order # 94-02-051
teceived: 02/14/94 Results by Sample
SAMPLE ID 894-0472 MT. HOLLY WWTP FRACTION 01A TEST CODE TCL EN NAME TCLP E%TRACTION 30
Date & Time Collected 02/09/94 14:30:00 Category
PARAMETER
RESULT
INITIAL pH 9.0
FINAL pH 5.1
Notes and Definitions for this Report:
EXTRACTED 02/15/94
ANALYST CS
TYPE 1

r M111
ENRECO
LABORATORIES GROUP
6661-C Canyon Expressway
Amarillo, Texas 79110
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Chain of Custody Record
Work Order No. Custody NO. 10742
Client Name 5 ° AE, -TNc, /R00 W11-z toy
Project I.D./Location MT. 116tt y Uj([JT®- EOuAt 1.7A776M �B As M)
Address 3718 OLD 2?4MeGe6UN-D 20. ,
Telephone
Sampled By np r'41.4C6V Z
4t
-�i
`
Analysis
a
a
tv
LA
p
E
n
Sample
w v
o.12
Required
,ru
�
o +
�-�
Description
Z
c ��
S�N\C Remarks
T. 1-1o11� 7p c A7 �N
is
SEE S NE
RelinquisF by: (Signature)
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Remarks:
1e
YESf NO1n/
Headspace If Yes, Amt.
RelinquIished by: (Signature)
Date
Time
Re c ' d by (Signatulej
Properly Sealed If No, Explain
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Chilled to 40*F If No, Temp.
Type of Container ' Lr1 e l oZ Uo A
Client Agrees to:
Accept Returned Sample
Pay for Sample Disposal ($30 per 100 gramsj
Additional Comments: ' +�-, P 0 vi P
Client's Signature �� �/ "
L- + <J b b r01-P vA Cj u r i t�
Distribution: Client - Pink Copy, i
Report - Yellow Copy K l
Orlginal - File

WATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS

REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R5-125A 7621 WHrrEPINE ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23237 [phone]
SEND SAMPLES
TO: WESTINGHOUSE ENV & GEO SERVICES INEUSTOMER: MT HOLLY WWTP SUBMITTED ROB WILLCOX
E go.
3109 SPRING FOREST ROAD BY:
P 0 BOX 58069
RALEIGH, NC 27658
DATE OF REPORT 01/15/92 PAGE 1 SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
Nitrogen
lSlros:.
p otae-
:::
autfur..;;:.
Calcium
Meg.>>:>
.... ,:..:;......
::: ';
�odlum:.;
Alum[.
Mi►npa�
:::.:.::rho:::.:....::::.::::>::...
hAmr>ir
W
::
..........:..
::::.....::_
:.:::. ..............:....:..::::.
rue:::::::.alum.::
::: :::.:::::.
.., :.:.:..:.%8..:96.:cat......
•.::.::: ;, >:.;:.;
.::.;:. ::: ....::..::
.::.:.n...
ee ;.:.::<.;
turn.::::::
.. ...............
:.: :::..
:.: Ns.:::.:
.....::.. ..:...
m,:Fe:.:::::,::.:::::::::•::::,:::_.:::.:.
» ;<.;:::;:.;.
>::::>.
;>;<:....:: ....::..,.......
::Gui:.:
:..:::::::...:.......:.:::.:::::..
"
" '
WWTP
WASTEWATER
SLUDGE
30132
3.73
5.90
2.02
0.15
1.50
3.58
0.33
0.67
670
940
0.97
880
..Chro-..
' _.
H.:::.
C.. .
,.,X.
Carbonate..
;:Soltda:::.:Ntt
Orgettia
ro9� n:
Molyfr..:
;.. dentJm
:;•;::.; ;.:.
N«
<:
:.
:...
. ppm<:Cd :
.:.
ppm Cr:
Pb
Pf...
m:.As.:
R.... _ ...P
m-:.H
... 9
:Ppm:.�
:
.
.
30132
1.0
100
80
85
7.9
2280
1.05
C�(Jl�tilX. �
PAUL C.H. CHU, PH.D.
All values except % Solids ere on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mgA (ppm) multiply by 10,000.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be
made to the work the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
Thu reyK ep Iles only to the .ample(.) are
re a Imum of thirty day* after testln .
A C fL�1 -IiQIMA- l
J
J

Westinghouse Environmental 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
and Geotechnical Services. Inc. Charlotte. North Carolina 28273
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte. North Carolina 28241-7668
[phone]
Toxic Characteristic FAX [phone]
Regulatory Package
Westinghouse Environmental Job No.: 1357-91-1875 Lab No.: 0475
Sample Identification: Mt. Holly (GBWB037) WTP-Alum
Date Completed: 1/14/92
Quant.Limit Results
Volatile Compounds mgLL mg/L
Benzene
0.01
BQL
Carbon tetrachloride
0.01
BQL
Chlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
Chloroform
0.01
BQL
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.01
BQL
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.01
BQL
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.01
BQL
Tetrachoroethylene
0.01
BQL
Trichloroethylene
0.01
BQL
Vinyl Chloride
0.01
BQL
Base Neutral Acids
o-Cresol
0.01
BQL
m-Cresol
0.01
BQL
p-Cresol
0.01
BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.01
BQL
Hexachlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.01
BQL
Hexachloroethane
0.01
BQL
Nitrobenzene
0.01
BQL
Pyridine
0.01
-ND
Pentachlorophenol
0.05
BQL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.01
BQL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.01
BQL
Pesticides
Chlordane
0.002
BQL
Endrin
0.0005
BQL
Heptachlor
0.0005
BQL
Lindane
0.0005
BQL
.Methoxychlor
0.0005
BQL
Toxaphene
0.002
BQL
s - -
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidiary.

Westinghouse Environmental 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
and GeOtechnical Services. Inc. Charlotte. North Carolina 28273
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte. North Carolina 28241-7668
1704)523-4726
FAX (7O4)525-3953
Toxic Characteristic
Regulatory Package
Westinghouse Environmental Job No.: 1357-91-1875 Lab No.: 0475
Sample Identification: Mt. Holly (GBWB037) WTP-Alum
Date Completed: 1/14/92
Quant.Limit Results
Herbicides Mg mc�L
2,4-D 0.06 BQL
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.009 BQL
Metals
Arsenic
0.05
BQL
Barium
0.05
0.22
Cadmium
0.005
BQL
Chromium
0.002
0.030
Lead
0.05
BQL
Mercury
0.01
BQL
Selenium
0.01
0.12
Silver
0.005
BQL
Comments: Results corrected according to recoveries derived from
matrix spikes of each sample.
BQL = Below Quanti ion Limits
QA/QC Supervisor: :;j� Date: / /2M/9a
N.C. State Wastewater #321, S.C.D.H.E.C. #99033
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidiary.