The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820647_Inspection_20200812 ... , ,... 5 « G-, :--.',, d, . . : ;'� ttt et,Ail ti i , �,4, a'„Inif I 'fig , ,} �r : -A-,, V fi Ss,"z``ssi Tk i", y . „1,::.:`` 0-- 7 iv,11 s?i 1_ r. aS7 ;4 hk s x 0,41.5s - -.T',` pe of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ason for Visit: 0/Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access to of Visit: r0`y� Arrival Time: ra r3 0 t1 Departure Time:I 6` (2-"•fq p I County: S0 Regionf4Y rm Name: �crv\ -8'3 ( Owner Email: vner Name: ° t lkl( / C)Vt,, ',- '"—C Phone: ailing Address: ysical Address: / cility Contact: i�VL 4-e"`r �(`o Of i c 5 Title: Phone: iI LC A Integrator: --14 3-- ()A r ' �•. i 'site Representative: I ;rtified Operator: N6 " -- , k (U7 Certification Number: I8ce6 [ tck-up Operator: Certification Number: i )cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: I 5 s i I •.;;-•.ce:=^.-t: - -'cam,• F'_-_ .• _:, i "::za•,`t >,". �2-4- ',. s ' _ ' "-g. - ,�;?r ';k= , 3 =;t� � ��: .:�s .,�.. �;*��.�- +�*<�.�. `��-s'.` i`, -''''re � A. sue, '- f;� •�.��:-�. DOsfr i-. ,'at a '"k ":s e � r»y'-' 7.1-- t {L�l"1:7a�',=,-=. ., ,, F•.fie: -, `..x-' 4.zpit v. 5.-, ��,,.. '-s';: • x.„ fin.^`:_-•%� tt,3'-` + �=-`•� :�,,� - _., j •---t Wean to Finish J; Layer An� .Dai Cow -- j x Wean to Feeder .-_'. Non-Layer VA•Dai Calf -- 41 ' * Dai Heifer 6, Feeder to Finish ;s. ' = f Farrow to Wean rL,(�' 62•� -.._ � )0sD , �D Cow ; 'A_ rt r 3'. Non-Dai �.--, • Farrow to Feeder It, :apacs' .P' p --» _Farrow to Finish 41, Layers Beef Stocker Beef Feeder �_- � Gilts 1 Non-Layers �..;� • ■ r� Boars _Pullets . Beef Brood Cow : #� Turkeys -: �: 'W. ::e . %r £. .+?�ku t�U�„x_`.^'��e��`;[-'`�'C� �:,'�..rk .�,CC�vvx-�,'' a� �. »r_ �� =4r�-�i��i� »h�*�'�"� �� . e ...' Turkey Pouets ¢=1 ,, ,;. ,,+.I. o t { - s. lOther Other - x ,� 4*'. .- 0 k„,,,,,z .,.: :;.a �u .z : -v °:::. ;•xt•:= ._,,;,.�,_, `s.i s,,—a • =_.,..=a-. r: >_;;M,r:'. -,... v--,,..%—i.':- :._ - ' ,.,,�r" b".G:A.•�r L.,x.� �-ii yaz--,s u.,3':;..ut. Discharges and Stream Impacts .Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes al-1< ❑ NA ❑ NE • Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑-NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0"g1A ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Erg.--"A n NE Z.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1:1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued (Facility Number: Z - 6tri Date of Inspection: rk--t51/46 Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑NE a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No la n-X ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): `D 2- 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [y N ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ITI' 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0'No - ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 114'e ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): ' °w G 13.Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑'Yes IQ-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E 'Slo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permifreadily available? ❑ Yes ❑'1<to ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes f o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application (❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Me No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: 'e2, - (-k(7 Date of Inspection: g tz- 'r2v 42-41) 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes IIMINo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 'List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: - 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [LPIo ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 04o (l NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? - 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes InNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any'additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 3 Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 'o"al�-00*iienilatiou4110.04 5otlier�;commen:0tPi �.. - r_=to_ uestton# =F Taman _YES ansvt�ers�and/or:an�atlilitt n _ �:�.FY.:_...,w,,. _- - - __ Comments. re€e ). .gP - Y._. - - - -- - �4 ..�„roc eea ttlret.i+i ekk. — 6— (cc,- ct — 6R- --ire_xt,"-ey,4— • C-a( 9,10— s o Cg -6 g Reviewer/Inspector Name: at�I �w Phone9(0'v133`333 `( Reviewer/Inspector Signature: cQ ,LlR Date:A 4(1 O TT 2/4/2V11 S Pa2e3of3