HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100888 Ver 1_401 Application_20101010
Labe Junaluska Assembly
Residential Services
October 4, 2010
Susan Wilson
Division of Water Quality
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Dear Ms. Wilson,
U r? ?.
1. 61 9G 0
DENR - WATER GUALITY
WETLS :1S ANDS TOitM4 :TER BRANCH
C ,..IRfXIAYYM4?LMnN6 A. .. ..
!L '7
OCT-52010
4v ?;
J
20100888
Please note the enclosed five copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Form and the
check for $570.00 for the permit application for the sediment disposal site at Lake
Junaluska.
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. McKay or me if you have any further questions or
concerns. Thank you for assistance with this matter.
Sincerely,
Director of Reblidentiar Services
Post Office Box 339 • Lake Junaluska, NC 28745 • 828.452.5911 • Fax 828.452.5912
www.lakejunaluskacommunity.com
..20100888
OTOF WA LkAy
cz;
? Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action 1D no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information IS ki DO
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular El"N'on-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:
? Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
? Yes ,1; o
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
? Yes to
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes El"No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: t,);-,411 0z:Z¢-Tx"LT
2b. County: A//jl? ., ee D
2c. Nearest municipality / town: /G4e-
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: jai
3. Owner Information s
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed.- .?7v 44-;. S?c'? 0 l v `>A7?7?f
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): "'?QS W,
'?Og? RpU
3d. Street address: G ?? 7
3e. City, state, zip: )A) t,,0: ef, y 5-
3f. Telephone no.: ,s _491-_172' ,,,,, 5--7 le
3g. Fax no.: V2 Z' 2-
3h. Email address: Y,0a4)LC
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
? Agent
4b. ? Other, specify:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: &1 4' Longitude:
1 c. Property size:` ° ? ,.-?-
c. +? ?•
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: rz'/a'
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin: r , } , • ;? f j,
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: , -,
<
<t ?rt .?? / /?j'?Ifi ['?I!! 7
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property::-
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the
purpose of the proposed project:
7-X? < ll-,n 7 C7
'
/
Cy /
f
?''?,1
`,rj jsl
?.,.y: ?i??i- .w?f: .i .?-L? ?-? ?I''.^/" 7?`.I+-/.IVG.-
r
?
?,I.-'rC'
?/+L_ ?
J
/?.?+?
y
°'
/
/y
?
/
/
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
C {%'7'-?t'•A ,` r^ r ?1 t ~ ??? f L ?r?G A i Z ?_ f?i c'".C-.';i,J,!.2.. /+?rr ! .! ...
7,??' ?' ~flC'4r i•L_i°??? f?? IfZ!r/4-J?l?lr ?l/. !?'r
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ? Yes ? No ? Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
r2ject (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ? Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
thi
E! Yes ? No ? Unkno
n
s project (including all prior phases) in the past? w
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. A"' tr 'C t.? `r
!
?
.'
' ?
?
?!« ?
"•,
?
? f
?
-
?
-
?
?
-
/
-
, t
c-
y_:4
l
•
f?
! ?"
i
::
4, c ,:?. r', 1: ?i ?/<<.1,.r'; ,/,? (;
f'
L f ?
? /..{?.?
r ,. r
rJ;' .?frt?j ?:. ft ? s, t'? :.f' /-?f,? ..??-, .r f?L. .. ?,? tF r ?c '..? it E' ? ? ?L.•?
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Q Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain. ^
A, t?' OK
1r 6"•t/ Y .. ?(.. /'?, `r ?' / ? `?•w'• lI f[! ??'{ ^/?•' ?S ?l ('.ra?k' /? fij
A/
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that a
" pply):
Pl
Wetlands [/St
reams - tributaries
? Buffers
? Open Waters
? Pond Con
struction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for ea
h
tl
2a. 2b. 2c c
we
an d area impacted.
.
Wetland impact T e of impact
YP Type of wetland
number
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
2f.
Area of
Permanent (P) or Corps (404,10) or impact
Tem ora DWQ (401, other) (acres)
W1 Choose one,9e-,xJe,4 Choose one
W2 - Choose one A- Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 - Choose one Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 Choose one Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 - Choose one Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 - Choose one Choose one
2h. Comments:
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream
question for all stream sites im
acted impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then com plete this
p
.
3a. 3b.
Stream impact Type of impact
number 3c. 3d.
3e- 3f.
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
3g.
Impact
Permanent (P) or intermittent IN
( jurisdiction stream
length
Temporary M width (linear
S1 - ? Choose one F/t'i,J? (feet) feet)
S2 - Choose one
S3 - Choose one
S4 - Choose one
S5 - Choose one
S6 - Choose one
3i. Comments: 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
r- ,
Z00
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, pond
the U.S s, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
U.S. then i ndividuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b.
Open water Name of waterbody C. 4d.
impact number 4e.
Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Type of impact
Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Temporary type
01 -
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
-
Choose one Choose
04 -
Choose one Choose
4g. Comments: 4f. Total open water impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
Pond ID number 5c.
Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres 5d.
purpose of pond ) Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes [] No
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Flooded ed I Filled Excavated
If yes, permit ID no:
5e.
Upland
(acres)
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impa
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou
cts
MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Catawba
6b. 6c ? Randleman ? Other:
Buffer Impact Reason for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e. 6f.
number - Buffer Zone 1 6g
Permanent (P) or Zone 2
mitigation impact impact
Temporary
required? (square (square
feet feet
82 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
65 - Yes/No
86 - Yes/No
6i. Comments:
_ Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Com ensato Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for (3' es ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ ? Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ? Mitigation bank
project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
Q Permittee Responsible Mitigation(-5
3. Complete if Usin a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
FTy : Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) : Choose one
Quantity:
Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
El Yes
4b.
4c Stream mitigation requested:
If usin
t linear feet
. g s
ream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d Buffer miti
ti
. ga
on requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e Ri
arian wetl
d
i
i
. p
an
m
t
gation requested: acres
4f.
4g.
4h.
5. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Comments:
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan acres
acres
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
47
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
? Yes ?o
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calcul
amount of mitigation required.
ate the
6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Zone Total impact 6e. -----
Multiplier
(square feet) Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 1 0
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Suffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
15) CAI
2c..Iff this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
? Yes o
? Yes ? No
g/ %
? Yes .?J No
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this projects
f?k?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
? Phase Il
? NSW
? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
? Other.
? Yes
OCoastal counties
?HQW
?ORW
?Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
? Yes ;Emo
,,R/?' ? Yes ? No
? No
? No
Page 8 of lo
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
Supplementary Information
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
f
bli
f
d
Yes [] N
use o
pu
c (
e
eral/state) land? o
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ;?J`No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
W
tl
d R
l ,!
e
an
u
es (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ??
?Yes E
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ?o
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of th e violation(s):
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional d
l ?
?Yes
eve
opment, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ryo
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
/?O LJX_-, 727 ?-A14-, 0,4 4772
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ?
habitat?
? Yes 'Vo
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
Yes ? No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. r'
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endaed
Habitat? f f?-+,. 1J g Species or Designated Critical
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? r-?
? Yes ?o
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in ? Yes O"N o
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
------------
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or arch
do /Gf Z ?r f` eological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
-F " ? Yes ?o
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. Whats(o?uJ?rce(s/) d/i?d) yvu use io? %aKL- the flarr,dplain determination?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applican A ey s nature
(Agent's signature is v id on if an authorization
letter from tho -r--
7-2-,11-1,9
Date
Page 10 of 10
Section D.I. A
Over the years we have hauled to over twenty sites in Haywood County that are not on
the Assembly grounds. These sites include major deposits at Waynesville Hi-tech Industrial
Park, Haywood County Fairgrounds, Waynesville landfill, and various farms. Two major
spoil sites on our property have been filled. This year we attempted to place sediment at
the Bethel Baptist Church, but were unable because of flood plain issues.
During each excavation we will store as much sediment as possible at our residential solid
waste facility to mix with yard debris for composting. This process is permitted by NCDENR
but is not adequate to handle the volume of sediment coming into out lake.
The cost of hauling, the terrain of Haywood County and erosion measures limit our site
selection greatly. Many sites are not accessible because property owners are not willing
to allow a steady stream of trucks on their streets because the heavy and muddy trucks are
a nuisance and cause damage to roads. The proposed site is on our property, serviced by our
roads that we maintain. The affected property owners are Assembly residents that are more
willing to accept the nuisance to protect our lake.
The proposed site is the best long term disposal site that we have identified because it allows
----------- -
or vertical expansion rather than horizontal expansion. Horizontal expansion is not desirable
because it would impact more wetlands and add to erosion issues.
Section D.1.13
By choosing the location for the project that will maximize the disposal volume on the smallest
footprint we are minimizing stream and wetland impacts. Up until now, on over twenty
disposal sites vertical expansion has not been an option.
By using dirt from within the impoundment to construct the containment dyke, the volume of
storage is maximized. This site will provide a long term solution to the problem.
? o
thm.
35500
c
??+{tb
i
p?
?l
o
V
4
0
A
v?
1
t-?
t?
Q
t?!
t
t T
1f\
i ?
i
'v
wV
4
`i
a?.
0
?V
}m' ?At
Z z
4 C%
-nro
(, N A'1
e
r,
e-i j .c eG G
fA/ C. N r'.
f
i
A107- 7-0
z
0
v
Q
7
W
E-,
W
E-+
O
v
z
0
v
W
J
d
Ez
q
v
x
x
v
E--?
0
x
w
Q
w
E-+
z
rx?
14
O
W
z
H
U J
z °
.4
U
< _
O
77-
O
U
LU
O
W
0
H
M
O
O
N
0
N
J
a
Q
f'
7
d
i
z
az
zwz?c?Z ? ?
?QgQ?a
aW ? -u ZU,
p=?g= -?
u? a a.
W Q Ur J W
W o Z? UO QZ
O ~ LL .. LE?t? ....... fo
to f- ? W
d,? te IHOW Q 3y :
> E LU 0-
O
U-1 N Mt Lo 0 rI
1 ?
L`
? O
o z
a
,a i o0 0
7 t; ? ; ? ?a ? W H
2 'i ( "3i33o"s' „? e V
rn 0. J
W ? ? f:3itf j. E' T
"s
eg
o
S
i
{ 1
Hi=
=
m
q
;
a
RESTORATION
PLAN SOUTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL
ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL
-g VIEW WETLAND RECLAMATION PLAN
LAKE JUNALUSKA, NC
- s
'
= s
s a e x EXISTING SOUTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL
`
)m ? $ R9s' LAKE
£ AREA ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL
WETLAND RECLAMATION PLA
N
€ sN'`
?,?;y
LAKE JUNALUSKA, NC + ?r €
4
x`
E
4 4
x
T
a??R
LITTORAL SOUTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL
gst SHELF ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL
5 FLAN WETLAND RECLAMATION P
LAN
LAKE )UNALUSKA
NC r 7
?
,
,
CIO
t j
R>
q1
o
n
6
4 4
SOUTHEASTERN JURISDICTIO
_m=
^ e PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL
`V ' WPLAN ND WETLAND RECLAMATION PL)
LAKE JUNALUSKA, NC
NAL _...e- .
t
® j
4g ..
A
r°
?N ; :
f
V
`?0
( FI-
N Hill
=QY., WETLAND
SOUTHEASTERN )URIS:OICTIONAL
PLANTING ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL
PLAN WETLAND RECLAMATION PLAN
LAKE JUNALUSKA, NC
u
i
!!f't.i gg
its°: gR
i
Y ---x 11-
= ai
, ON 'V>ISn1VNnE Spiv-i ¢
ai 41 s= t,
® NH 1d NOI1dWV'ID9 d GNVIJ1 M rvVId
r` ;,y
IIONf10O ]AI1'd1SINIWad SHld
34
„pE z
`
w
1VN0ll.OIasidnC NdDISVDH1f10S ?131HM oeEx =
;,1$e ,
s
52 M.? o s
X;o
\?.?% jYEReMile
?, r-?r _ Silc i
?? ? ?? ,?r? ?• \ -. ? r ; e ; 600 l
}su ry .? f- ` -l.
` M O r
• ` .?-, -`? \ V .-v, n.? it ? ?_ !\` )
\? l? • _^ ' C° ?`' \ oath center 8M 256?a; '` • = e - °e '/ . ti
?% •? • /1/'1 . Swimming 3 U ri a l u s k a rj?? \
,. . pool .a c BM N y y
• °? ;?• n •,? ?rQ ELEV 2562 2 •ct ° •?? / : N1 ??L
Trait • • °?<? ?'y y f ?. , i '? I V
b Tit A 12\
.? ; elw4v i . .
o tee. r/_ \? ? i ?' ?- -• ??I--,? J ._--\\ •
• • ; /?- ?f ?6fFi? ° ?- / Q
,nChur hO • ;•
Golf
J?
' • s. 1 r j' /.f7• •` I FairwS _ I - /i " ? ?? .-'¢`''> ` IJ~7? i
?- t + • r Hill
i ?? I ?U ••'''? f _.- --. c / err
° d ° •?. ••y ?\` a ? • .LPN (?,-???``r? `S ? r. ?. uJ
arb vi
%,' \ °? 1 (jlr?T'Ryl '/NJ r C as•
_,.. ? <i Hilfc?esS'A?fLmonEl /:•". J -i??.? - • ?? •???-. 64'r ??. '-?? ?C?s .?,a ?, I ?! ,
???J?' ? ? lo. -, fib. a n` "\ ? ? ? .?, ? t ?'?``? % ?._I` \U
(? ."' ; s.'• • ?: n.1 dio J % mil f°` = 1 -i
?/-,' a% \ r --'S ,?i r .• / Pa`i litre Dove 2?r
Ste- `? I ti ; S. I 1 +- ,? t!I r ` •? _ n / C - . ?? ?c
•;%? ate. '-r _ ?k bYn?SVi?llf
r f ? `•.#' rw ' ,. , rt' ? a' ! Il 41.."/ E-, fR` / fC-, ..
\\ o
tv ? o
0
O
7co
"tom >>? ` ' Fu ,tOM/
O v
•
\ .• • '
10
• ¦ ? = y • • •
Swimming 'a a lGfi t7 /L
?• dc ' ?n
Id
• t• p4o1 ?'
one.
ELEV
?NViC ?, •?rQ
s • \Tra i) ?•y ,
.?
. rl • ? ,. _ ;? •' ?? ? i iii ^ ' ??' li
Sil10 276
(
?IIMap??grlev`e i
nrf ??? •??Churrth 1 i . ?j
/4 77
K ch a . M..y r--
t
Avoidance and Minimization of Stream Loss for Lake Junaluska
Over the 100 year life of Lake Junaluska, siltation has been an ever growing
problem. Presently, about five hundred truck loads of silt are carried into the Lake
each year by Richland Creek and Factory Branch. In the past, silt has been
deposited at over 30 locations. These sites included sacrificing part of the Lake,
building an industrial park, building recreation area, capping the city landfill and
many private sites. Over the last four years, we have not been able to identify any
disposal site that did not require Army Corp permitting, but the silt continues to
be deposited.
At this .point, Lake Junaluska Assembly, the State of North Carolina and the
Federal Government have spent millions of dollars to preserve the Lake because it
is a major economic resource for Western North Carolina. We are not willing to
sacrifice this resource. The dredging of the Lake, including construction of the
wetlands and littoral shelf, has greatly increased the fish and wildlife population.
In searching for a disposal site, we have contacted the local Governments and
many property owners over several years. We have not been able to find any site
without a water issue. The material from the Lake is not desirable on a
construction site because of the moisture content and organic content.