20020164 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 4_20101115

a ?.
?C) C? c) i
Trout Cove Branch and Tributary
Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 388
Monitoring Year 4
2008 Final Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 2009

1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
e
Trout Cove Branch and Tributary Stream Restoration
2008 Monitoring Report (MY 4)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract Page 1
2.0 Project Background Page 2
2.1 Project Objectives Page 2
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach Page 2
2.3 Location and Setting Page 3
2.4 Project History and Background Page 5
2.5 Monitoring Plan View Page 7
3.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results Page 9
3.1 Vegetation Assessment Page 9
3. 1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas Page 9
3.1.2 Vegetation Problem Area Plan View Page 10
3.2 Stream Assessment Page 10
3.2.1 Morphometric Criteria Page 10
3.2.2 Hydrologic Criteria Page 11
3.2.3 Bank Stability Assessments Page 11
3.2.4 Current Condition Plan View Page 11
3.2.5 Stream Problem Areas Page 11
3.2.6 Numbered Issue Photos Page 11
3.2.7 Fixed Station Photos Page 11
3.2.8 Stream Stability Assessment Page 11
3.2.9 Quantitative Measures Summary Page 12
3.3 Wetland Assessment Page 22
4.0 Methodology Page 23
5.0 References Page 24
Figures
Figure 1. Vicinity Map Page 4
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View Page 8
Tables
Table la. Project Components Page 2
Table 1 b. Component Summations Page 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Page 5
Table 3. Project Contacts Page 6
Table 4. Project Background Page 7
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events Page 11
Table 6. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment Page 12
Table 7. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Page 13 - 15
Table 8. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary Page 16 - 21
Appendices
Appendix A. Vegetation Data
Appendix B. Geomorphologic Data
Appendix C. Wetland Data
Appendix D. Integrated Current Condition Plan View

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Trout Cove Branch and Tributary Stream Restoration Site are located in Clay County, North
Carolina within the Hiwassee River Basin. The stream was designed and implemented under a
North Carolina Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) grant in June of 2002. Funds
were transferred from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) to the
CWMTF in 2004 and the project was first monitored by NCEEP in 2005 to service mitigation
needs in the cataloging unit (CU). Based on available data, the actual restored length is
approximately 3,120 linear feet for Trout Cove Branch and 888 linear feet for the unnamed
tributary. As this was a CWMTF project of that time period, the designer did not resurvey the
profile after construction and therefore a geomorphological as-built was not produced. The first
geomorphological measurement point was generated in 2005 after transfer to NCEEP, with 2008
representing Monitoring Year 4 (MY 4).
Geomorphology and vegetation data collected in 2008 were repeated for those monitoring
locations established in 2005. Two additional longitudinal profile monitoring reaches were
established in 2008. Additionally, based on 2008 visual observations and data some cross
section classification types (riffles and pools) were reclassified in MY 4 as compared to
nomenclature utilized in previous monitoring reports.
Based on the available data, stream profiles have remained relatively stable between monitoring
years. The two main issues on the project mainstem had to do with pool aggradation and
structural piping. All other metrics indicated performance percentages averaging between 93
and 100%. The extent of pool aggradation is likely the result of historic low flows preventing
pool scour and sediment transport. Approximately half the structures surveyed had some level of
piping, but the visual observations and the profile indicate no significant or systemic loss of
grade. While two aforementioned stability or structural parameters appear to have shifted
substantially between MY 3 and MY 4, field observations and discussion with NCEEP made it
apparent that these differences may have been more an artifact of data compilation discrepancies
in prior submissions and differences in visual thresholds between performers as opposed to a
sudden shift in project performance variables.
The MY 4 vegetation monitoring indicates that the project meets the established criteria for
planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 320 stems per acre at the end of Year 3 of
the monitoring period. Average stem density for planted stems in MY 4 is approximately 428
stems per acre. However, when planted and natural stems are combined, the average stem
density is 775 stems per acre, which is well above the minimum established criteria. While there
were differences in data collection methodologies between years, the MY 4 indicates a 31 %
increase in total stem density since MY 3. Vegetation problem areas consist of bare bench and
floodplain areas as well as isolated invasive/exotic species throughout the easement area. While
the stem densities and vigor are good, the site does exhibit a few, small isolated bare bench areas
and also has approximately 10 currently isolated patches of high threat invasive plant species that
span the project extent.
Trout Cove Branch Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Project Objectives
Project objectives were not explicitly stated in a mitigation plan since the original funding
sources and monitoring requirements were not established by the NCEEP for the Trout Cove
Branch and Tributary restoration project. NCEEP will attempt to acquire a plan document from
the Natural Resource Conservation Services or CWMTF that delineates the project objectives. If
documentation is acquired, project objectives will be included in next year's report.
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Prior to restoration, both Trout Cove Branch and the unnamed tributary had been impacted by
past land uses including grazing, mowing, channelization, and other maintenance activities
(HRWC). Stream reaches lacked riparian corridors and exhibited severe bank erosion with
stream bank heights ranging from 1 to 6 feet. The streams were classified as unstable B5 stream
types. Soil loss for Trout Cove Branch was estimated at 170 tons per year prior to restoration.
Stream restoration methods were based on natural channel design methodologies as proposed by
Rosgen (1996). The approach included channel realignment to restore pattern, dimension, and
profile in keeping with a reference condition. It also included installation of rock vanes and root
wads for the vertical and lateral stability in this B type step pool channel. The completed
restoration included approximately 4,008 linear feet of stream restoration and associated riparian
re-vegetation (Table 1 a & 1 b).
Table Ia. Project Components
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Project Footage
Existing Restoration Buffer
Component or Approach or Stationing BMP Elements Comment
Feet Level Acres
Reach ID Acreage
Reach I R 3,120 If 0+00-31+20 Included riparian re-
8
6 vegetation
Reach Il -Trib R 888 if 0+00-08+88 . Included riparian re-
ve *etation
- Information unavailable.
Trout Cove Branch Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table lb. Component Summations
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Restoration
Level Stream
(if) Riparian Wetland
(Ac) Non-
Riipc r Upland
(Ac) Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Riverine Non-
Riverine
Restoration 4,008
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
0 0
Totals 4,008 0 0 0 8.6 0
Non-Applicable
2.3 Location and Setting
Trout Cove Branch and the unnamed tributary are located in Clay County, North Carolina within
the Hiwassee River Basin. The project is located within Cataloging Unit (USGS 8-digit
Hydrologic Unit) 06020002 and the NCDWQ sub-basin 04-05-01. The project site is located
between the communities of Warne and Brasstown approximately 7 miles southeast of Murphy,
North Carolina (Figure 1).
The headwaters of Trout Cove Branch and the unnamed tributary originate primarily northwest
of the project site. The drainage area for Trout Cove Branch is 0.45 square-miles and consists of
a mix of pasture, forest, and low-density development. The unnamed tributary has a drainage
area of 0.09 square-miles with current land use including pasture and forest.
Trout Cove Branch Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
f 5ti_l
j
1 f
1
`.:. 1 ,?. • ?. _ „?,,:,. "'t" tl ' , ' ?, . tel. r r ?) `? t ?`??
r "W _ t Unnamed 1? ?l
p
0 ?,"12 (+,`r a .
Tributary
t7 (? ?`.' ? , r r
- f fE r , r cr y ?c?33]j P 1? 1 t f S.$ r itt r}
e
` .
? Trout Cove -7 ?r
T_ ..
(? t l0'wx r Branch
r t d +t"-•" fir' lr'. ?!? I - `
n
x
r
0
?r rat > ""y j k
w
a
y t. ,1 I ? r r
-,
r v - ..5 7 J, fJ ,A• 1? -
!ttr1 .} I i''r`.
?t C ?,..?_ry~ ?,,, ?,1 .? J' F M .. _,?t f? !, i J?? ?^ 'F ' 97
fj
n
lr"1 r ?.?. 'y'? ? ,- ? f ? ,? titi? ? i?,l ' ? y d,,'? ( ' a? _ *''• t`? ""? 'l ?, y ? ?
I
l]71
J'I
f
d { i?
Old
f94?
?y>. I 64
r- Mika1 ti ' 74
"? (VirM f
t
t
A
A
.? Bt+e rte' _ _ `?
i
' ?N Y Figure 1 - Vicinity Map r I
ACKSON
1 CWNTY
i T? Trout Cove Branch & Tributary
l11 ?q/
EQUINOX
.rr v, bWNT \ rnV(p0NMe\r%I » (,)S to"11
-TI r' Restoration Site °° • j
Project No. 388 N
Directions: From 1-40, take US-74 West. Turn left 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
onto NC-141 South. Turn left onto US-64 and turn Feet
right onto Old US-64 West. Continue through the Clay County, North Carolina
Town of Brasstown and turn left onto Trout Cove
Rd. Turn right onto McCray Rd. The site is located May 2009 7.5 Minute Series Peachtree Quadrangle
on the right.
2.4 Project History and Background
Trout Cove Branch was originally completed in 2002 as a CWMTF project. In 2004, NCEEP
purchased the project to apply towards mitigation needs in the Hiwassee River Basin. Initial data
collection efforts occurred in 2005 (MY 1) by the Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department at North Carolina State University with 2008 representing MY 4 of 5.
The project activity and reporting history from 2001 to 2008 are presented in Table 2. Project
personnel and contact information for the design and monitoring components are presented in
Table 3. Table 4 presents background information for the project site and the reference sites
utilized for design.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388

Activity or Report Data
Collection
Complete Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan - 2001
Final Design - 90% - -
Permitting N/A Jan 2002
Construction N/A -
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Project Area N/A -
Live Stakes and Bare Root Trees Planted N/A -
Pro'ect Completion N/A May 2002
Baseline / Year 1 Monitoring 2005 2006
Year 2 Monitoring Nov 2006 Jan 2007
Year 3 Monitoring Nov 2007 March 2008
Year 4 Monitoring Nov 2008 May 2009
Year 5 Monitorin
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Trout Cove Branch Final 5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 3. Project Contacts
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Designer
Primary Project Design POC ARCADIS G&M
Unknown
Construction Contractor
Primary Project Design POC C & H Services
Unknown
Planting Contractor
Planting Contractor POC Unknown
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Seeding Contractor POC Unknown
Unknown
Seed Mix Sources Unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers Unknown
Monitoring Performers (Y1) - 2005 North Carolina State University
Stream Monitoring POC Unknown
Vegetation Monitoring POC Unknown
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2006 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 26714
Stream Monitoring POC Jessica Regan [phone]
Ve etation Monitoring POC Jessica Regan 919 846-5900
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2007 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 26714
Stream Monitoring POC Jessica Regan [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Jessica Regan (919 846-5900
Monitoring Performers (Y4) - 2008 Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC Steve Melton [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Sarah Marcinko 828 253-6856
Monitoring Performers (Y5) - 2009
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Unknown - Information was unknown at time of report submittal.
Trout Cove Branch Final 6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc,
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 4. Project Background
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Project Count Clay
Drainage Area Trout Cove Branch - 0.453 square miles
Unnamed Tributary - 0.094 square miles
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate (%) Trout Cove Branch <I%
Unnamed Tributary 1.3%
Stream Order Trout Cove Branch - 2 order
Unnamed Tributary - 1 order
Ph sio ra hic Region Blue Ridge
Ecore ion Southern Crystalline Ridges & Mountains 66d
Rosgen Classification of Proposed Design Trout Cove Branch - Boa
Unnamed Tributary - Boa
Cowardin Classification N/A
Dominant Soil Types Trout Cove Branch - RhA, LoC, FrA
Unnamed Tributary - RhA, LoC, FrA
Reference Site ID Trout Cove Branch - Big Tuni Creek
Unnamed Tributary - Big Tuni Creek
USGS HUC Trout Cove Branch - 06020002
Unnamed Tributary - 06020002
Big Tuni Creek - 06020002
NCDWQ Sub-basin Trout Cove Branch 04-05-01
Unnamed Tributary 04-05-01
Big Tuni Creek 1-21-5
NCDWQ Classification Trout Cove Branch WS-lV
Unnamed Tributary WS-IV
Big Tuni Creek C; Tr, HQW
An Portion of Project Segment 303d Listed No
An Portion of Project Segment Upstream of a 303d No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor N/A
% of Project Easement Fenced 83%
N/A - Item does not apply.
2.5 Monitoring Plan View
See Figure 2 - Monitoring Plan View.
Trout Cove Branch Final 7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

o. 11
\ •\ - ` h
?
? m c ?
3
R ct
\ ` \ e?? I ? ? I I 0
..
.. ...
? ?' ?
•
.... ...
...
\1 rim p'0? ?\
\

7
/ 1 p

\ ? dl

(?xx ° z a
•\ °o o U

•
\ w

----- -------
--
----

\ r

\'?
?•\ \
? 1 CG
;
Ir
8 O

\ G
M y O

\
i

U
t

., .__. _.._
.---.-

\ -1
1 Y

1 p0 1 o a
0
O
d
w
C
'C
?O+
G
7
LZ
3.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results
The MY 4 vegetation and stream data collection occurred between July and November 2008.
The constraints and results of the vegetation and stream assessment are discussed in the
following sections and referenced figures and tables.
3.1 Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation monitoring data collected on July 9, 2008 and August 19, 2008 meet the established
success criteria for plant density, which is the minimum survival of 320 stems per acre at the end
of Year 3 of the monitoring period. Average stem density for both planted and natural stems in
MY 4 is approximately 775 stems per acre.
Using the overall site stem density of 590 stems per acre stated in the MY 3 report, there was an
approximately 31% increase in stem density between MY 3 and 4. This increase is principally
attributed to the accounting in MY 4 of natural stems and six additional species, some of which
were previously observed, but not included in Table 5 (Appendix A) of the MY 3 final report.
These species include American hop-hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), Black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), Box elder (Acer negundo var. negundo), Black cherry (Prunus serotina var. serotina),
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). In contrast,
there were several species listed in the MY 3 report that were not relocated in MY 4 and
therefore were labeled as missing. Furthermore, vegetation monitoring plots 3 and 7 had low
total stem densities and do not meet the established success criteria as indicated in Appendix D -
Integrated Current Condition Plan View. Nevertheless, if natural stems are excluded from
average site stem density calculations, there are still approximately 428 planted stems per acre,
which is a 34% higher stem density than the minimum requirement.
Due to differences in monitoring methodologies between MY 3 and MY 4 several assumptions
and modifications were made in MY 4 in order to implement the CVS-EEP Level II sampling
protocol (Lee et al. 2006). First, photo point locations (plot origins) were georeferenced,
flagged, and marked with indelible marker. These points will be the location for reference
photographs during subsequent monitoring years. Reference photographs were taken from the
origin facing the opposite, diagonal plot corner. For each plot, x and y coordinates and other
required data were recorded for all stems in accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol. Second,
several different colors of flagging tape were previously used to mark plant stems, but the
significance of the colors were unknown. All previously flagged stems were assumed to be
planted and were re-marked with pink flagging tape and any un-marked stems that occurred in
the plot were flagged with blue and white tape, and are believed to be new recruits from the past
monitoring year. Lastly, several trees of Tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Black locust, and Red
maple (Acer rubrum var, rubrum) were previously flagged, but did not occur within the bounds
of plots 3, 4, 5, and 6. Taxonomic nomenclature follows Weakley (2008).
See Appendix A for vegetation data tables.
3.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas
Vegetation problem areas identified in MY 4 included bare bench and floodplain areas as well as
isolated invasive/exotic species throughout the easement area (Appendix A - Table A6).
Vegetative growth at four stream bench locations is stunted and appears to be related to poor soil
Trout Cove Branch Final 9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
substrate. The bare floodplain problem areas noted are the result of unauthorized mowing and
livestock fencing extending into the easement area. An additional problem was identified during
the final site visit in November 2008. Mary Jo Deck, one of the existing landowners, indicated
that the electrical company recently attempted to mow the existing power line crossings along
the upper portion of the project site. A small area was mowed within the easement area prior to
the landowners stopping progress. This issue will need to be resolved to prevent potential
impacts to the riparian vegetation in proximity to the existing power line crossings. The most
significant change in vegetation problem areas between MY 4 and previous monitoring efforts is
associated with the extent of invasive/exotic species noted in 2008. The MY 4 efforts
documented isolated, dense patches of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and Multiflora
rose (Rosa multiflora). In particular, Japanese honeysuckle largely accounted for the vine
strangulation reported in four of the seven monitoring plots. The species most negatively
affected by vine strangulation were Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) and Tag alder.
3.1.2 Vegetation Problem Area Plan View
See Appendix D - Integrated Current Condition Plan View.
3.2 Stream Assessment
3.2.1 Morphometric Criteria
Morphological assessments of Trout Cove Branch and the unnamed tributary reaches were
conducted on October 6 through 7 and on November 23, 2008. Longitudinal profile monitoring
was increased in 2008 to include a middle survey reach as well as profile measurements for the
unnamed tributary. Longitudinal profiles were surveyed for 2,807 linear feet for Trout Cove
Branch and 189 linear feet for the tributary. Due to drought conditions in 2008, water surface
data collection was limited to the Lower and Middle reaches. Cross-sectional data were
collected for the five previously established locations on Trout Cove Branch.
In general, the 2008 stream profiles for the Upper and Lower reaches remained similar to
previous data collection efforts. It appears that previous monitoring reports combined pattern
and profile measurements for the Upper and Lower survey reaches while data collected in 2008
were calculated for each individual reach.
Based on MY 4 visual observations and data, some cross section classification types (riffles and
pools) were reclassified in MY 4 as compared to nomenclature utilized in previous monitoring
reports. Cross section 2 previously classified as a riffle is clearly within the scour zone below a
step and was reclassified as a pool. Cross sections 3 and 5 previously classified as pools are not
influenced by the scour zone of a structure and therefore were reclassified as riffles.
While the calculated cross sectional values reported in 2008 appear variable from previous
monitoring results, these differences are associated with different bankfull elevation
identification between monitoring years and are not the result of systemic trends in bed
movement. The cross sectional plot overlays illustrate that bed form has remained within the
variability and sensitivity tolerances expected.
Trout Cove Branch Final 10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
3.2.2 Hydrologic Criteria
Based on the on-site crest gauge reading and old wrack lines within the floodplain area, there
appears to have been a bankfull event between MY 3 and the initial site visit in MY 4 (Table 5).
The crest gauge was reset and checked during additional site visits and no additional bankfull
events were documented during MY 4.
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Date o Data Date o Method Photo
Collection Occurrence (if available)
Wrack lines, stained vegetation,
2006 Unknown displaced/flattened vegetation, and sediment
deposition
Wrack lines, stained vegetation,
2007 Unknown displaced/flattened vegetation, and sediment
deposition
6/27/08 Unknown Crest gauge & wrack lines
3.2.3 Bank Stability Assessments
A comprehensive pre-construction BEHI was not performed on this site and therefore does not
provide a pre-construction baseline for a meaningful comparison.
3.2.4 Current Condition Plan View
See Appendix D - Integrated Current Condition Plan View.
3.2.5 Stream Problem Areas
The majority of the stream problem areas identified during the MY 4 visual assessment had been
identified during previous monitoring years. Problem areas were primarily associated with
stressed or failing engineered structures, which have resulted in areas of bank erosion and stream
aggradation. Table B 1 in Appendix B provides categorical feature issues by station, the
suspected cause, and denotes the number of a representative photo.
3.2.6 Numbered Issue Photos
See Appendix B for photo examples of stream problem areas.
3.2.7 Fixed Station Photos
See Appendix B for fixed photo station photos.
3.2.8 Stream Stability Assessment
A visual stability assessment was conducted for both the Trout Cove Branch and the tributary
reach during the initial site assessments on June 27 and July 9, 2008, and again on October 8,
2008. The 2008 stream stability assessment for the unnamed tributary represents the first year of
data collection for this reach. While the 2008 visual morphological stability Reach 1 table
illustrate significant declines in performance for some feature categories (pools and vanes), this
change from previous monitoring years may be associated with data compilation discrepancies in
prior reports as well as visual assessment thresholds between monitoring performers rather than a
sudden shift in stream stability. Additionally, historic low flow conditions have likely caused a
Trout Cove Branch Final 1 l Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
reduction in sediment transport resulting in increased deposition within the pool scour zones.
Additionally, while these two feature categories appear to have significantly declined between
years, profile measurements indicated no significant or systemic change in grade. Data collected
during the visual stability assessment for Trout Cove Branch and the unnamed tributary reach are
included in Table 6 below and in Appendix B - Table B.2. Table 6 provides the categorical
stream feature summary for MY 2 through MY 4.
Table 6. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Trout Cove Branch / Reach 1
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02* MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles - 94% 99% 99%
B. Pools 100% 100% 71%
C. Thalwe 100% 100% 95%
D. Meanders 100% 100% 97%
E. Bed General 100% 98% 94%
F. Bank Condition 100% 99% 96%
G. Vanes 96% 95% 85%
H. Wads - - **
*Percentages entered were based on the Table B 1 from the 2006 report. There are descrepencies between Table X
and Table B 1 for the 2006 report.
**Data were not collected due to uncertanties in as-built numbers and limited remains of root wads.
- Information unavailable.
Table 6 Continued. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
nnamed Tributar Reach 2
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles - - - - 98%
B. Pools - - - - 100%
C. Thalwe - - - - 100%
D. Meanders - - - - 100%
E. Bed General - - - - 99%
F. Bank Condition - - - - 100%
G. Vanes - - - - 84%
H. Wads N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
- information unavailable.
N/A - Information does not apply.
3.2.9 Quantitative Measures Summary
Quantitative stream monitoring data are summarized in Tables 7 and 8. As-built
geomorphological data is unavailable because of non-standard deliverables associated with
CWMTF practices prior to transfer. Additionally, the MY 1 longitudinal and cross sectional
values were unavailable. NCEEP and Equinox will address the MY 1 calculations during the
subsequent monitoring reports. The associated cross-sectional and longitudinal plots are located
in Appendix B.
Trout Cove Branch Final 12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
?

V I I I I I
?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
z
y I I I

O

I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
00 10 I-
N O N M O N ' O 00

G
bl1 R
I ?O N
' N .-. C^"' ? O? N '"' N M
O N N v'1 Q Q
A ?•
+
IG M N N ' O
O N
'? I C
O O
O LO z z

I'?a iw
1. r?+

(n

r4 O
CO O
'a
V
R
'?'
O
?
M
U
r
O
\C
M
DO
"'
£i L ? i
a
'? N 7 M ? N I? 00 N N O ?--I V1
? C
"
? O O O?
?}
y1
/
hq
QJ ?
?
?
M
O
v'1
N
d'
?
'?
p
N
?
N
?
I
I
O
o0
?
?
?
N
I
?
M
00
p
I
~ V
? V
0
y N p N ?, p 0 "' 0 0
C." V
N
O Op
?" OO i°.I G O? O M N N V O O N N C,
O M W I?
I
/. N
V
M
^'
.-.
•-.
N
C,
N
C N
O
I? O ° O
.V.I y V?.I cl 7 00 r 00 O C, 00 M .. N d
a?
°'
o
C
r
c
_
v
_
Q
rn
o
o
O
00

'?y C o
??I y? =

X
k
O
C,
D\
C?
h
O o
v1
O
'?
M
M
M/ U N m M C N N M M 00 N N N O M p O C p?

W 3r U C N I^ oo C O O O ?: O l? 00 a\
I? y

c
av? ?

I? O R
?
A F V
? ?
?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I VII,
Q
Q
FFII ° ? ? z z

rA F
y

a? •
z I I I
o

a U
ea
c
a
o
06
o
06
,,,
y0°,I A N

7 Q Q
? ?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
1
1
1
1 z z

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
r- >1
L .C ro L
? L
... (? ?„ a, N N
o L ? L a, L P L
c y L
.. L
y O v v q 'C G
.v .v ? L _ ?
E
ci -o
3 o
c6
a
ci L
v
° a,
° • o
'n v
00 E
R
a°i
c c
in m
o ?
o
'
o
? O
LO) En cn
0.1 g
0 G
O ro
,? ro
?"'
C x
.L p
.
7 M U
W
3
U °'
?
«r. O
O
O a'
f„ „
.-. v
C
U w
? U x

/ 'b fl
O
?
a
0"
v
t C
o ?, w
oy ? 3 C
w W N D C a? N G
a >
v a n
i.
.? ° N ? ? u l

d
a
u
ea
x, d
E w
?
l .°'. t?
c h
?
b
?

a
A l
a
a
v?
U D\
?g
GN
pq T
•N Cu
Q ?
b
ro
C
Q
ro
C
U
ro
C
O
C
W
K
0
a
p7
W

a

O
c
o
"
a v
> C
C O
G I/1
w

7'?
? ,
w O
U y

b
C 00 c0
00 u
? ? M r

?a to
az

o so
Ha""?

Lam'
r O; ?
O
N
v ^-? N ? N oo
M
N
O
N 00
N
? O
h
c0
x

' ? O N N ? V) D\ O O o0 ? O O ? Q Q
U M ? Z Z
p p

Rl 1"" M W M N M
N O N O ~

O
C14 It m r- 00 cq N

U
Cl
Cl
CP,
c
O
N

M W y q. O? O M N oo N O N N r-:
00

it `?. ?
?+ p?^
Cd
"t
00

t
00
o
O\
00 M O O
(V
N
\O
r
-
N
O
0000
O
S
. O
C a ++

H

x
etl

,n

o

o

D
17?

d

o
?

0

0•
'n

o

O

l?
?

r
O

p
?, L+ N OM M N N M c
+i ?O
o N
O 0
0
M O ,
'?
O 0
O ,
_, M
o

o a? ?

a Z 3
.? o 0 0
? oA

? o
IN ? g
C ?

U U p o ,
+,
a> O N
y

R
m
L

'

' .C L Chi O!i Q?i y `n r?
.
?

•?

L

L

O

,.Cr

C
fl C7 ?U" P• ,.G C .C° b .7. C d C
'U
O
b
'R
°
F.
C
C
.C
U
U
w
p
? Q Q .? ?, ? ? ? ?

co
°o
o

U
U
?'

?

u

o
o ,

o

c

v

U c's

x
c. .L ? ,?
M r? 3 w m v b o
L
w
? L
3
x
u

? (u v
O Q/' i ? U
C "
. w
ca a+
? w
? -
I I l i t-1
R R V
N
? ro
Q ?
b
C
:d
C
O
0
C
O
U
:d
G
C
O
C
W
x
0
C
C
W
T
a
O
0
b
w
o
? u a
U

w C ap
? 0
0 ?
M
v O ?
oz•c
z ? o
0
0
o
F= ri ?
C
d
,
,

A
L
y

cu
? O
N cq ,n l- C N O oo
.
L. l? M C O ? N ? M O N M
•

?
00
N
I 00
In Cl C,
Q
Q
O N ^ O vi
N
C
O
z
Z
Q
CO 00 t? -It O N r-?
O
CIS OJ
V R v1 O 7 M C\ O O M D N

"

o

" D\

N v1

7 00

M ^

' N

N ^ 6
1? v
00

N
N
O

O
^

.^
41

N
i t

a.+
6J y
N
c}
O
N
N
C
M
C
C
It
O
It
C y ,c, M ,n 7 , N N ^ 00 N N C
N
?
O T O M N N C C C N N l-

^ O

?z Lr)
IM ??i v? 'n N C - C? M N [? V' N ?D

4
a ,? °d to M C? O C 00 ? N r-
M i O oc 00 V)
C
\ L
'?' F C r
N M C N V C
O D,
N In
N M O
C.j
'" O
C
O ,/1
U
O C O
? ? ?, U

y?i ? ?r
?
?C
N
N
V
C
O
O M
M
?
?
N ,n N C M --? 00
r

/ C
a? U
L" a+ tom.,

L Q
" Q
z z
o?
OD

a
0

Qj 00
C
^
ICI
/• ^
?
N

G?
? 6J
?
R
Q
Q

.. y ? a " "' C V
b

3 b

3

?
N
C
C .'
'
b .b

3
id
C L
C N
C •
U O
V1
00
Cp
C
C C
-? C?

C6 O

C.

.

i N

AO
Q „ E ? c a ? 3 ?, b b a a ?° ?
q
u
LL, o Y a. 0.1 c °?
o c 0 o ? U
ro
m
C
? ?

L. o V, ?

x b 'u
o w o U
a

a

y
d
U
+o ?

3
E w
as IV c b
b
a A a a" v'? ?
U C'
sg
C N
Oq ?
Q
.C
C
C
O
A
a
rn
C
O
U
b
a
E
C
O
4
C
W
x
0
C
0
u?
T
a

? O
C
o

b
CIS
<d O C w

C O
U
o
O r- 00
d 00 4)
.. M >?
U
z o

0 0 0
Hai
Table 8. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Trout Cove / Project No. 388
Trout Cove Branch / Lower Reach (794 feet)

Parameter Cross Section
Pool Cross Section
Riffle
Dimension MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
BF Width (ft) - 15.69 10.96 11.60 9.60 6.79 12.50
Flood prone Width (ft) - 54.22 32.41 30.70 50.00 28.13 45.50
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) - 11.21 17.63 20.70 10.02 8.78 12.40
BF Mean Depth (ft) - 0.71 1.61 1.80 1.04 1.29 1.00
BF Max Depth (ft) - 2.35 2.22 2.70 2.30 2.19 2.80
Width/Depth Ratio - 22.10 6.81 6.50 9.23 5.26 12.60
Entrenchment Ratio - 3.46 2.60 - 5.21 4.15 3.60
Bank Height Ratio - 1.04 1.00 1.20 1.26 1.00
Wetted Perimeter(ft) - 16.9 g12.77 13.70 10.88 8.64 15.30
Hydraulic Radius (ft) - 0.66 1.50 0.92 1.02 0.80
Substrate
d50 (mm) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
d84(mm) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* Not calculated due to unknown as-built elevations.
N/A - Does not apply to this project.
Trout Cove Branch Final 16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
.fl

v k

O aC

E

It M C, It
O te ? ?
v1 N r
., M O v1

-- 000
00
0
°?
°° 00
O
O
O
V
Q
Q

?c
N
N C,
O V)
M
5
...
O
O
U
Z
Z

G M N

4 O

M N
O
N N
O
_
N ON z M O
O N
bA
t."
W)
m
In 00
1.0 ool rq
ll?
w C ct--
} 00
N C,
O
- v
'?
C O
00 ? M ? ? ? ? O M ? ? ? ? 0 0 7 Q Q
o
00 vi
M N '• O c
i
N oo 0
0 '"' O O U Z Z
? ~
V
'N N v) M O N

•L O .1 ? 00 N ? ? ? ? N
a 'n N O O n
CC
O L7 N v o o vi 0 0 rt
O V W °M° M ?O O o0 -- O O U z z

"
? N m 'n r-
O •% ^
s
N O l--
00 C, 00 M N
U

0

H
w w ? •? ? w w w ? v !? w w O N O
L OD t y O cd rC-i C
-d

• 7

?y

C
L

C
O

C C

U 6>
..
y

C

C a
C
O
u U
w

? U

A

cc *
L
Q
3

?I V Q
a s ?
.b
ca
3
h
v
?v
b ,o
? L
C u
E 04
o u
c 3
O Q
o
w
ob
v
a -8
ro y
a •o
71
U
V ?
Cd U
U
* *
C
O c?
0.
v N
w 'C
U U
L
E ti
O
?O
cd
b?
0.
,b oq
C .C
X ?
? o
.c ?
C
ro ,a
t
ca
A
?. T
>" a
w •?
U .V+
? u
o .fl
? c
c ?
11
'C L=.
U 1-1
o M.
? a.
O
E?
y U
*
* *
**
* *
•O
0.
O
T
a
cl
0
c
0
A
c,
cli
c
7
0
W
.5
Q
z
U O?
rC-i 8
? N
pq T
cd
Q
C
:a
C
O
C
O
U
c
v
C
O
c
W
X
O
G
W
ro
u: o
uU
C 0O
? 00 N
M 'y
0
o z G
U o
o '0 0
_ d

k
?
O R

C
?

'?
V1
C,
N
d p
S
000
^+
O
V' N ON M O -- <t
O

i O
`N'
e?
M
d
O
It
°
°
°
M
m
Q
Q
O
r-
?c
m 7
O
z
r-
O
"
00 00
O'
O
p
p
U
z
z
i.

",? O O 7 Q 000 d'
V1 N 00
z
N
bA
co $ ¢ <
¢ Q Q ¢ ¢ d ?
cw ? z z z z z z z z
o
' o
? C N
00 r.i `'r ckd Q
Q
Q Q Q Q Q ? Q Q
- Q ? Q Q Q
C.0 M C ?" z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

C
L z IQ,
G
Q
Q
Q
Q
'
Q
Q
Q
bra z z z z z z z z
y C>
?H 'Vb

b
b LwV „ ¢ ¢ Q d ¢ Q ? ?
?a. o z z z z z z z z
p o.C Q d d d d d d ¢ ¢ ¢ d d d d
' d d
oUc o z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

all
°
¢
¢
d
d
¢
¢
?
¢
Fc z z z z z z z z

? ¢ Q ¢ ¢
Z ¢ Q Q Q

? o
?
z
z
z z
z z z z
g
p F R ¢ Q Q d Q
' d ¢ d
z d ¢ Q Q Q d d d
U o z z z z z z z z zz z 'z z z z
00 ?

? ,
rC,
?'
Q
Q
'
?
?
Q
Q
? z z z zz zz z z
H

° C
a C
C
N
o
N
o U
w
?
d
2
? a -
V7 !/1 R C? V1 •? _E
cd R
W U o u w U x
LY' >
C b V 7 rn

r
a
a a. ¢
G
a v
o
V p"
R, Q
o
a.
y o
C
O U
O
h Q
C
z
U Ol
G C
.r O
C N
b?q cd
Q
C
C
C
O
m
G
G
O
U
ro
c
v
E
C
O
W
x
0
C
.7
W
c ?
t ?
U
C ap
ti OC U
wM?
uo?
uzo
0 0 0

0 ", C, Z CN kn CO C N Q Q
?r ?r
G ? ? M O N N '• 00 C z z
O
CJ

a?
00

oo

0
O

00
O

00
'n 00

N
V%

Q'

M

Q

Q
a
y
y ?

l M

l o o M M ? N O z z

? C, r- ' a ¢
? N a o o ? ? ? -: M O z z

CA

•? y of 0 0 0 O C O 0 0 0
y W r. G M 4 M M N O z z

00
00 W
F
, 00
r
M
v V)
N 00
O
kn
Q
Q
.
•
? O R
Z
i L N M O O ?O N ? V ?O M
l? V1
Q
Q
t
W " N O O T
C Cq
^ 00 N
N C
-- N :
C z z

z zz

C C u tn

oU? ?

U c
6J ^? Cu7 G ?' O\ N r in
Q
Q
'.
F
y
O O
~ ? ? ? O V1 V O ?p v1 M ? Q Q

6J 'y
z
z
H

^O 'O O v v '? C r v b O 00
b b
o .o c?
c,
b
C
m
o ?
N u 3
c

3

c

p U u
?

a a
.o
4
h
0
a
0
c
0
Q
Q
'z
U O
rO C
N
c
to
cd
N
Q
.b
C
O

C
O
U
O
O
0
c
w
x
0
c
W
F a ?
c ?n
? o
u
v
00
i., oo chi
? M
?o?
oZ c
U ? o
o '0 0
'b
_
O? 6>

S ?
O

?
r

1 00
D\
W
ll?
O ? M M
00 \
D
M
M
*
O
?

? k
00
N
M
*
?
Q
Q
oo a, * U Z Z

N O
C or0 17, * C,
N
C/? * N D I\ N M * N
bA

•? 6, M C, I-O 00 V1 o0 N
r.+ W
•
O a N 00+ O --?
?
OO o M o0 M C? C? M C? 10 ',o- V Q Q
1?-?
V
O
M v
N
•? o
O
N
a?0
l?
00
'"
o
o
U
z
z

•
.
. M .C ? ~ .
O CUC
L z 6J ?
' q O O N Zo
ON
L G N ? M ? O ? N
?;wd ?

x
'ti •i?i ?+

..
p
d? DO 11

N oo

oo
_
_
In oo o

p o 4 0 0 0 o o o
V N
O ?" oo M M M O -? o o u z z
- '.
0 Y
* y
f" N

? y
I
N O r
oo

M

1 00

O M N
r

C H g

o
?

H
y".. ? .w. • ? ? w w ? ? ? !? w w O ? O
.n " C y 7 U y
3 u
ro b c a
o a a? '
a y ? c °'
o u
o N y o

L
u J u
^y b w ao O G? C UC w
CA C
G h v PL _
CG a' ? ? ? 7 W * x
V U ? * G
O u
? ? c 3
E Q
ti
a a a" d
li
lu
a
v
u
b
oG
a
0
-o
c
0
U
U
0
U
a
c
7
b
U
'C
C
o d
L u
U
C U
C 7
b
E a
'b C
? o
o
cCd A w
C
y Q ?d
d a 7
W UZ
^, ? C
L ?
o Cl.
u
i ?
r C O
.ro+ cl U
o a .-.
4 C >g
o •= L ?
•C o ? °o
u o
z
F ?
* ?r w
U C
H C
. N
C
W cd
Q
.b
N
C
O
ro
C
O
U
`2
C
C
C
O
C
W
x
0
a
¢7
W
c v?
? o
U
o0
V W
M
u o cu
c
oz
u?u
o•so
H a ?
d
_

°
N, k

° R

'8
M
N
?
'7
6
Q
'
?

?
? p

8
o z a
"

0
¢
0
OM
a
¢
a
Gd ?r M D * q 00 0
0 O .?.

? ? ? N ? O ¢ O * O O

a w

?o z z z z z 'z 'z z
o
o
oo? °
?
a
¢
Q
-Z
Q
Z-
¢
¢
d
d
¢
¢
a
Q
a
Q
-
Q
a
-Z
u M? C z z z z
z z
z z
z z
z z z z z z z z z

.F?
c zz zz zz z z z z z
??
yy

'b L d Q ¢ < ¢ Q d Q
z z z z z z z z

>? N k

00\
R ¢
? a
? Q
? Q
? ¢
z ¢
z a
z a a a d Q Q
z ¢
: Q Q

OU?:
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
z z
z
z
z z Z
z ?
z ?
z

O JO. ice, ¢ Q Q Q ¢ ¢ Q Q
z z zz zz z z z z
a,

o
o
ell
0
0o
y,

N ? ro
.C ? .? ?„ i L ? .C b4 Y
. r L O
C v .C. C
b

a C C

U ?
3 C U

cn C .U

Vai w

R C C N

V7 N

V1 w

n3 id

? p

?
)
W
y 7
U
w 3 v w U °o o
°
Gr ? c
C U
ro Lt. U
c x
c ° L b
C p Qw b
1
/ ? t 1
C
co
? U d
u u
U C
rA

0

L U CL
v
y O
r
L y ? b
?
a a ?
r
U
U
\7
b
O.
C
.O
C
d
'C
a
v
v
c
L
v
.?C U
:d O
U p,
U
v
a °
T
o a
0
'c c
C Q
* z
j C,
.C. O
. N
C T
by ?y
Q
.b
C
O
c
0
U
c
°
0
C
W
x
0
c
.c
W
f=a`?
c ?n
U
00 L
00
Gp M },
on
o z
u o
d
o '0 0
3.3 Wetland Assessment
There was no wetland monitoring components for the Trout Cove Branch Restoration Site.
Trout Cove Branch Final 22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
4.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in 2008 were intended to replicate those employed
during previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996 and USACOE 2003). Vegetation monitoring followed the standard CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al. 2006). Any deviations from MY 3
vegetation monitoring methodologies are stated in Section 3.1, Vegetation Assessment.
Trout Cove Branch Final 23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
5.0 References
HRWC. Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition, Inc. Brasstown Creek Watershed Restoration
Projects. http://www.hi-wc.net/troutcove.htm.
Lee, M.T; Peet, R.K.; Roberts, S.D.; and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. http://cvs.bio.utic.edu/rnethods.htm.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO.
USACOE 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACOE, USEPA, NCWRC,
NCDENR-DWQ.
Weakley, A.S. 2008. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU). North Carolina
Botanical Garden. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC.
Trout Cove Branch Final 24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix A
Trout Cove Branch
Vegetation Data
Appendix A
Vegetation Data Tables
Table Al. Vegetation Metadata
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Report prepared b Sarah Marcinko
Date prepared 11/18/2008 9:39
Database name cvs-ee -entr tool-v2.2.6.mdb
Database location Y:\E uinox ro'ects\EEP Ve _monitorin \cvs-ee -entr tool-v2.2.6
Computer name D16TNK71
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSH EETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata This worksheet, which is a summary of the project and the project data.
Pro'. planted The number of living planted stems per acre, excluding live stakes.
Pro'. total stems The number of total stems per acre, including live stakes and natural stems.
Plots List of lots surveyed.
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes.
Vigor bspecies Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed b species.

Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted b each.
Damage b species Damage values tallied b type for each species.
Damage b lot Damage values tallied b type for each lot.
All stems b lot andspecies Count of total living stems of each species; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project code 388
Project name Trout Cove
Description Trout Cove Stream Restoration
River basin Hiwassee
Length (ft) N/A
Stream-to-edge width (ft) N/A
Area (s m) N/A
Required lots (calculated) N/A
Sampled lots 7
Table A2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing Unknown
Alnus serrulata 13 6 4
Betula ni ra 4 4
Ce halanthus occidentalis 2 1
Clethra alnifolia 1
Corpus amomum 13 7 1 1 1
Salix ni ra 2 5 2 2
Liriodendron tulipifera 2
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis 3 1
Acer rubrum var. rubrum 4 2
Total 9 44 26 3 1 0 7 0
Trout Cove Branch Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix A
Vegetation Data Tables
Table A3. Vegetation Damage by Species
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388

Species All damage
categories No
damage Other
damage
Diseased
Insects Vine
strangulation
Acer rubrum var. rubrum 6 2 4
Alnus serrulata 23 17 1 2 3
Betula ni ra 8 8
Ce halanthus occidentalis 3 1 2
Clethra alnifolia 1 1
Cornus amomum 23 9 1 1 3 9
Liriodendron tuli ifera 2 2
Platanus occidentalis var.
occidentalis
4
1
1
2
Salix ni ra 11 3 8
Total 9 81 35 2 1 7 36
Table A4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388

Plot All damage
categories No
damage Other
dama a
Diseased
Insects Vine
strangulation
388-01-0006 11 11
388-01-0007 7 7
TC-01-0001 9 8 1
TC-0 1-0002 22 7 15
TC-0 1-0003 6 4 2
TC-01-0004 8 7 1
TC-01-0005 21 12 2 6 1
Total 7 81 35 2 1 7 36
Trout Cove Branch Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
N
ro
Q
C
O
on
Q
b
C
0.
V C cn d en
H°
U 0 v'? N ?D --? c+? N N
O
F
ti en
V N M
H o
V M lr) N kn

rl ry
? F o
a
.
? o0
00

O ?'
? U
O U
• M
p"
L
?a

N 14
R C M O
O

v ?
? F Q
ro

O
^ M 00 ?O M - O N N M
y
H v Cl) I"

? i
O ?
i
ti
I.J

C O h t

_
Cc
y 0 ?c
s
a h
.O K O_
O i s
ti v
W o?
U ?
U O
U h
? ?
O C
C j
v ? y V
4 y?
?L h v U
Q 4 ? 0 Q Q 'm

O
F
U C,
'-" O
N
bCyO cC
Q
.ti
C
m
0
g
7
W
c v?
w' 0
0
s ?
00 d
CO M
O
oz
U ? o
O ..
O O O
H o. ?

Appendix A
Vegetation Data Tables
Table A6. Vegetation Problem Areas
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388

Feature Issue Station
Numbers
Suspected Cause Photo
Number
B
B
h See CCPV Poor soil substrate VPA 1
are
enc See CCPV Poor soil substrate
M
d Fl
d
l
i See CCPV Unauthorized mowing V
2
owe
oo
p
a
n See CCPV Unauthorized mowing PA
Livestock Encroachment See CCPV Exclusion fence within easement boundary VPA 3
See CCPV Rosa multiflora : On site seed source
Invasive / Exotic Populations See CCPV Lonicera japonica : On site seed source VPA 4
See CCPV Ligustrum sp : On site seed source
Trout Cove Branch Final
Project No. 388
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
May 2009
Appendix A
Representative Vegetation Problem Area Photos

4 4
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA 2) - Mowed Floodplain
Monitoring Year 4 - October 8, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA 1) - Bare Bench
Monitoring Year 4 - July 9, 2008
Appendix A
Representative Vegetation Problem Area Photos

?
x fi f
t

?NV

? S yr t?'r ?3 ' cr ,¢s?
R h
fi ? 1
? e
It
d
J w A'
t
I .,,? 5. hrsJ3`? 7k EW 3z,?af .?k "x,97.,
i

I ?
I

fis wa eec'
I
R
rq
t

o?
?dx ?

e
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA 3) - Livestock Encroachment
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA 4) - Lonicera japonica
Monitoring Year 4 - October 8, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #1
Monitoring Year 4 - August 19, 2008

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #2
Monitoring Year 4 - July 9, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

o- ?.?z a x ' F
P ?

Trout Cove Branch Final
Project No. 388
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #4
Monitoring Year 4 - August 19, 2008
8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
May 2009
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #3
Monitoring Year 4 - July 9, 2008
Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #5
Monitoring Year 4 - August 19, 2008

Vegetation Monitoring Plot #6
Monitoring Year 4 - August 19, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc,
Project No, 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #7
Monitoring Year 4 - August 19, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final
Project No. 388
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
May 2009
Appendix B
Trout Cove Branch
Geomorphologic Data
Appendix B
Stream Problem Areas Data Tables
Table Bl. Stream Problem Areas
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Trout Cove Branch / Reach 1 (3,120 Feet)
Feature Issue Station
Numbers Suspected Cause Photo
Number
Aggradation 0+36 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source
0+95 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
1+10 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source
1+45 Failed structure preventing downstream pool scour
1+90 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source
2+40 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
2+95 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
3+35 Failed structure preventing downstream pool scour
3+55 Failed structure preventing downstream Pool scour
4+05 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source
4+35 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source
4+60 Failed structure preventing downstream Pool scour
5+10 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
5+50 Minimal flow to transport sediment from upstream source SPA 1
6+00 Minimal Flow to transport sediment from Upstream source
11+25 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
16+30 [:ailed structure preventing downstream pool scour
17+45 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
21+20 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
22+26 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
23+10 Failed structure reventin sediment transport
23+30 Failed structure reventin° downstrcam pool scour
23+82 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
24+55 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
25+60 Failed structure preventing downstream pool scour
26+03 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
26+98 Stressed structure preventing downstream pool scour
28+55 Failed structure Preventing downstream pool scour
Bank Scour 1+05 Thalwe mi gratim associated with stressed structure
1+50 Thalwe migration associated with failing structure
8+18 Undercuttin causing bank to slum
9+60 'rhalwe migration associated with stressed structure N/A
13+37 Undercutting causin bank to slum
15+20 Thalwe migration associated with stressed structure
28+I0 Thalwe mi iation associated with stressed structure
Engineered Structures 0+85 Structure piping
1+36 Structure piping
2+30 Structure piping
2+85 Structure Piping
3+30 Structure piping
3+50 Structure pi prig
4+54 Structure it in g
5+05 Structure ii in
8+80 Structure piping
9+55 Structure piping
11+20 Structure piping
12+68 Structure piping
14+70 Structure piping
15+10 Structure piping
15+30 Structure piping
16+25 Structure piping SPA 2
16+85 Structure piping SPA 3
17+40 Structure piping SPA 4
17+83 Structure pi ping,
19+13 Structure piping
19+80 Structure piping
20+04 Structure piping
21+14 Structure i in
22+20 Structure i in
23+25 Structure piping
23+78 Structure piping
24+50 Structure piping
25+55 Structure ipin,
25+98 Structure piping
26+91 Structure piping
27+95 Structure i in
28+50 Structure piping
29+75 Structure piping
Headcut 6+75 Unknown N/A
Trout Cove Branch Final
Project No. 388
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
May 2009
Appendix B
Stream Problem Areas Data Tables
Table B1 Continued. Stream Problem Areas
Trout Cove Branch / Project No. 388
Unnamed Tributary / Reach 2 (888 feet)
Feature Issue Station
Numbers Suspected Cause Photo
Number
Engineered Structure 0+90 Structure piping
2+35 Structure piping
3+85 Structure piping N/A
4+58 Structure piping
4+87 Structure piping
Headcut 7+14 Unknown N/A
Trout Cove Branch Final
Project No. 388
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
May 2009
Appendix B
Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
Stream Problem Area (SPA 1) - Pool aggradation
Monitoring Year 4 - June 27, 2008
Stream Problem Area (SPA 2) - Failed structure
Monitoring Year 4 - June 27, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Appendix B
Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
Stream Problem Area (SPA 3) - Failed structure
Monitoring Year 4 - June 27, 2008
Stream Problem Area (SPA 4) - Stressed structure
Monitoring Year 4 - July 9, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
T
ro
U_
b0
O
C
y.
O
G

oa
x
b
c
a
Q
L
Wi. v F

w a ? a i a a a a 00
00
y o
p p CC
W ''' •'O c
O '7-
C
00
\ O'
00
?G
.- S
x I
N ?
N S ?
CO Do
o0 c
00 C?
V'i L?
m, Z'
CO S
M
L. ff C
a
?v •? a` O` v1 it a a` Q\ D` W •? Q` 1 D, ,_, V1
.
C
C
C ?
C?
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
¢
¢
¢
Q
Q
Q
¢
? ?
?
\ .7
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
?
r
rr•? z z z z ,? z z z z z z z z z N z z z z z z
Z
L
++

v i L
w i
O ,a

?
•c
?
}
•c
?
a`
kn
o`
V)
a
V',
a
V)

V1
o,
?
l!1
Q
z
a
ty-,
a
v;

z
¢
Q
z
Q
Z
a
vl
°?
V'?
°)
It)
o,
In
?
G (~ E

C z
? ao 4:
M v L
?
?
'?' y
N
~
n F i
M '
F., a
?+ ?' ? ,•+ d'
? 7
? 7
? M
?O M
?O m
M m
M O?
Vl 00
V; 7
? 7
Vl C C,
V1 00
? ¢
z Q
z Q
z
ul
?
Vl
M
?
;E
.
.G a, M ? Z v v,

o ?
L u
CIa ?
b

0
G, L C
•
G ? LR.
? `J
v, _
,"
r

C G
O ?_ •
C 7
J
C
?+ U
•?• .'? C
L
O
h ?
U a
U
?
? ,o
? oq
G
?G
r.+
?
L a
? p
N U
W
cr

r• 'D

: 1

CA C ? v 'D L C cC ?.. ?i
L Oi W) c v °-' G m o

to
:n y v -•
U O
(.?
y C
L C
O ?..
U
U
0/
G
C
U

v

0

f

o

=

= v
In.
b

0. c
f
v ti ? ro
b v u 4t G 'ro
-
7 a 0 3 u c
y o
V ^
v ? n
v
il 'C. v E
o :n G
3 EL
'O v 0p
v
- C
o c
o c ?'
:

L
v
c
'D E o c o .. a ,

c 21
,-
s E u
?
'
c
v -M
o
r r. 0.
c
o E ti ? °: c c ? U a q ? ti or v
tin o

a
Q
i c
?
?
a
n
°'
v
3
?
O
O
¢
v
U
U ?
?
w
x
Q
w
w
ti
c . c .
i U ,
•-+ N K', <j tri •-• N m, •-- N (`1 M •-- N U --• N M, ?t rl
L
0
an

U

v

v

v: on
v
3 ?
-b
c c
v
C7

•Y

v
o ? ? a cn > 3
,
C W ? C7 ?
N
.G
on
c
'O
3
O
b
a
a
:d
3
0
C
O, .D y
_ = U
G ? L
O C ;O
'O O v
L
L
O
Q 5 17
z
U a`
C C
r••. C
N
li
Q
b
c
G
O

7
G
O
U
G
G
O
W
x
0
G
7
W
a7
G_ 'n
4L O
L ?
U
b ao ?
o oq
o z '?
U ? o
? .v •c
G O O
F= w ?
v
A
cC
C
v
0
0
O
c?

b
v
a
a
d
L
1,,, y? ? O
•i O O ? O ? ,Z

a ? . H p-I r.1
C
O
c?
? :?y
0
b
O
0
6\
O
0 U\
0 S
0 e
0 CD
0 C,
O e
C C)
O ?
O
C
C ?
O ?° ?
O ?
O C
O c Q Q
it ?
L
a O O ? O O O O O O O C C O ? O O ? O ? z z
.° v
? v
C
? ? ., c?c ?

Q

d

d

d

Q

d

Q

Q

Q

Q

d

d

Q

Q

?_

N

°

d

d

d

d

d

Q
Fy

`y

z

z
z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

o

o

z

z

z

z

z

z
z ?
°
L
a^
a?+ ''O

O
00
00
00
00
00

S

7

V Q

z

7

? Q

z Q

z Q

z Q Q
? z z
Q zQ

o°OO w 6J L ? ?
Cd M 00
Z E
w G
00
00
00
00
t-
,'-'
V
V
O
V'
z
z
z
O
'?
z
z

u uN L --?
?Z
A. O

O L ?

ta
o v ?
? ?
C o
c
L
W
c
r. .,

ti oj?
c
c
?
o

O ° C v
v O
L t.
°
? C
J
O w
? O

' bU
C r.
X
•-
O O CC
[ Lr
a F C'. y
w
r
CIE 'rJ
°. w
X c ?
o i.
v
a ?
°_
r ? c? C
t
y
??
C C U O O
U ? ? ? ti ? C G C L ? :a o ? O w
bU
:D O
vOi ..
"O O
z C
N C ?.

ro
7
r
cC d o y v a a b u u
v c o I v °' ° xk c ° ° ti 3 c
_ I
Iz
v
4)
u L) G

d v

rG v

u ro cs

v v o
4 Q? CL

O

R C y

b

° y w
0 vi C
3 T7
o u
c
=
n
' C
o

O
o
br
C
'v
y y N 0 O ° 0 O u R bb . C C
/-? c,. A N
' rte. 5Ci C b N N L
° .D :b w G.

? c c v
c c
v 3 w ? b y b0 a avi o
w d [i ? a v 7 ? Ca O O d n C7 U ? Q [ T Q u: w w
^^ C`1 M ? V7 -+ N c+l ? N ^- N ff1 ? --' N U -- N M ? -- N
L
0
bA
y
U bU v C
L
,N v
w n
O
c1
y
b
? `"
C
'd

? d 0.'1 U Q W ry, L x
C
3
0
> c
a
Cl. ? v
c 3
C
v
c ?
0 7
C
Q
U C,
C
.C . O
N
bU ?
Q
b
0

7
C
0
U
c
E
C
O
W
x
q?^
W
d
u. o
u
v O ?
oz
U ? o
v•
o '0 0
F- a ?
O
G
L
a
-o
G
b
0
ci
G
0
U
'U
v
v:
C
U
x
b
G
0.
Q
U a
L ^?
? O
O
U ?
o `n
O `n
? O
U
O
N
0
r.
0
0
0
a,
Ilk"
O
0
00
0
0
n
O
O W
o ?
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
N
+
O
O
+
O
O
+
O
(1333) uo?1enaj2j
w
P?
I
I
N
M

U C,
G O
rq
C N
on ro
Q ?
G
ro
c
0

a
G
C
U
c
a?
c
0
G
w
x
C
G
a
W
r
b
u- o
uU
i.
ro
O
oz
U ? o
O O O
H a. ?
Appendix B
Cross Section Plots and Photos
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #1 - Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - October 7, 2008
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #1 - Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - October 7, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
U
O
O
L
0.
C
r
O
a.
C
C
u
v
v
C
U
Oa
x
b
'll
0.
a
Q
0
i?r N
O
U ?
O ?
O ?
i.
U
C
?C
+
C
0
+
O
0
0
O
M
+
O
0
N
c
0
0
O
O
t
? O
R
v
C
O
Cr
I
N
M

U Q\
c O
.. C
c fV
bD T
Q
b
C
C
O
C
C
O
U
y
c
v
8
c
0
c
W
K
0
c
c
tr?
a
b
c ?n
w o
c d
u
m M
O
az°
U _o
? .v C
O O O
w
F.
(13aj) UOI)UAalH
Appendix B
Cross Section Plots and Photos
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #2 - Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - October 7, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of '5
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #2 - Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - October 7, 2008
C
G
4
r.
O
a
a
0
u
V;
0
U
as
W
u ?
C
c
U Qj
u
F L
U
I I I I
? I I I
1
i
I I
I
I
II ? I ? I I
I i
-
I
I
I
'I ? I I
I Oa 1
1
I
I I I

1
1
I 1
?I

I
?1 Ill
I
lit

I I
1
I

?

I I
?I I
1 II

-
I
?
I
i I -
1
I
i
I I
- ill
I
I
I
I
I I
i
I
1
I 1
1 I
I
x ? v v ? ? ae ?
(;aa3) uoI;enaja
a
a
k'n
O
Q
M
0
N
t
0
0
N
t
O
a?
C
0
tn
0
0
0
0
0
O
C
t
? O
M
?Q
I
I
I,
N
C O
C N
pp T
N
b
c
c
0
C
E
c
0
c
W
x
0
c
W
M
c ?
u- o
s ?
U
? U
OMO
O
oz ?
U ? o
0 0 0
E- ca ?
Appendix B
Cross Section Plots and Photos

Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #3 - Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #3 - Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
O
O
a
C
0
C1.
C
C
U
Vl
O
U
N
E
u
c
O
O .
O ?
F-? o
U
I
?I
I I
I I
I I ? I
I
II I
I
I
I I I
I I ?I

I

I
I
I
I ?
I
I

i
i I I
'
ll I
'
I I I
li 1
I

I

it I

I
I ' I
/ I
1 ' I j I
I
I I I
1
I
K ?D ?D ?O ?O ?D ?C V1 lA
(133j) uol;ena121
a
a
O
0
0
O
O
v
v
o
+ C
p O
RS
0
N
0
0
0
Lir
+
h p
Ln
w
I
rl
I
N
c O
C N
Q
c
0

C
O
U
E
C
O
W
x
c
.c
W
M
et
c ?n
u- o
z ?
V
y 0
00
o z •?
U ? o
? .v c
0 0 0
Appendix B
Cross Section Plots and Photos

?.

' y
?? 8
? 6
Y d r q
? £ Y ?

W
r :.
a,
1h 1W 6? ?R
:
$ °' 'yd
?aY ?r: kx
y
?
f .
Y
?+ Lbq g
t
? 4PP
)
§°
0

i"P
1. d`NSAI"??zz 'c 0.0

Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #4 - Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #4 - Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

t
a
s
0
a
c
U
v
c
U
X
C
a
a
U
? w
U a
i.r
GJ C
? C
O
U u
O ?
[? O
i.
U
I
I
1
I

I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
?
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I

-

FT
4` 1

I

T
kIn
Ln
O
C
0
tn
0
O
7
O
tn
M
O
O G?J
C
O
? R
+
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
+
00 h ?D ?A ? M N -•? O O
(laaj) UOI;UAa[al
CO.
Q?
N
M

c o
? N
bD ?
Q
c
:a
c
O

c
0
U
c
8
c
0
c
W
k
0
c
W

u• o
r ?
U
07 ri Y?
ozC
U ? o
7 .U C
0 0 0
E~a""?
Appendix B
Cross Section Plots and Photos
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #5 - Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch - Cross Section #5 - Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 4 - November 23, 2008
Trout Cove Branch Final 16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 388 May 2009
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
0
LL
CJ
O
0..
C
C
C
u d,
.C. O
C N
W ro
Q
b
C
C
O

7
r
C
O
U
ro
c
C
C
C

W
K
0
c
W
u
7
v
a
4
L ?
u a
a
as ;,
> z.
o ?
U y
L C
F"7
C
C
J
r
LL W
O
U
K
b
c
n.
a
Q
v ? oA
oz
U ? o
5 .ti 'G
0 0 0
O
a
lu
w
O
a
rl
5
b
a
pC
.-1
X
'O
G
v
Or
Q
OG
u
s 'C
u 'S7
c
i
0.1
'o c
U a
7
F?
c
0
.a
yo
ro.ly
0
1qa
O
19x0
1x
0
1?x
^x?
1
y
?O y
Vx u
1 i
1X7`
w
Y
W
0
?i
00 0 3
1yx ya a
?o
c
Y
yo
o°
1,5x
0
1tix
1tiR
?O
11x,
yo
?o
a
C O
'i N
bA roQ
b
G
0
<n
C
O
U
b
a
N
C
C
O
G
W
x
0
G
u?
W
7d
G ?/1
u- o
v
00
00
M
j O G
o z
U u O
a •y c
O O O
8 N ?' ? C ? C 41 O ?
r a a P T T a P a a
(1aaj) uo!aenJIA
C
0.,
O
n.
cd
C
7
G
O
W
X
c
v
a
a
d
d
a
L
v
u 3
rl
0.1 y
> L:
o
U
o?
L C
F
'ou I
e
a
ryq?
O

?o
ti^`ry^ 41

7
O
tiyx '?
3
K
u
o ?
00 5
M
0
titix

0
tix
ti^e
y?0
ryOx
U
ti
C N
pq T
•r cG
Q
'O
C
O
y
G
C
U
c?
c
v
E
c
c
c
W
x
0
c
7
W
a,
c
u- o
.c ?
U
lr
v ? U
W M Y?
O W
cz
U ? o
0 0 0
E= a ?
o n o N ? y y
n d ?
(133j) UO!jena)j
0
a
w
0
a
ro
b
a
W
QC
.J
m
.xi
b
C
y
a
u
CL
u 7
G .0
L L
Qa
O
V C
L f0
F c
c
a
lb??
^x
?o
^x
h
u
ti
u
` N
xr v
1 q Y
O 0?
d
?y
bx
b%o
ti5
bx
bx?
c o
? N
OU ?
Q ?
v
b
c
0
C
r
C
O
U
b
c
v
K
c
0
c
W
x
0
c
pa
L
c
N
LL O
uU
Ly o N
M
N ? W
oz?
V ? o
a °J c
0 0 0
F= a ?
C :C N ? N
T T O. ? P
(Jaa,)) uo!jena)g
Appendix C
Trout Cove Branch
Wetland Data
(Not Applicable)
Appendix D
Trout Cove Branch
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
a ?x
[i
S
E
a '
w
44
z
-o c
b ?
'ZI
? c
> y
a o
z a.
Q o ? 0000
H v
z T a ?
o v w
o u
0
F-
- c
0
C] a
F s
5 a ?
? X
a ? w
ro y
N o ro
c
Nro
N r?
N
O
z
c
O
0
N ?
>, O
W
? w
? O p C7
F- p z _.. :l N
y O
U U
i