Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0022934_Enforcement_PC-2020-0006_20200913DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES - CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT Violator: UCS, Inc./UCS Main Plant County: Gaston Case Number: PC-2020-0006 ASSESSMENT FACTORS 1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation; UCS, Inc./UCS Main Plant discharges to South Fork Catawba River, a Class WS-IV waterbody in the Catawba River Basin. The wastewater discharge from the UCS Main Plant has by-passed the effluent structure including chlorination resulting in improperly treated effluent. 2) The duration and gravity of the violation; The following was noted in the May 22, 2018, site inspection: There is woody vegetation, animal burrows, and erosion on the side slopes/dikes. The outfall structure (where the chlorine disinfection is located) is deteriorating and needs maintenance. The access to the outfall structure (pier bridge) appears unstable. The outfall structure, which contains the chlorine disinfection box, is part of permitted wastewater system and must be maintained. The Permittee should conduct an engineering evaluation of the system to verify its integrity, which includes: confirming the path/piping for influent wastewater to the lagoon; assessing the sludge level in the lagoon; assessing the structural stability of the lagoon slopes/dikes after vegetation removal; evaluation of the outfall structure. The permittee must locate the effluent pipe location. The past 8 year's inspection reports (01/22/2010, 12/29/2010, 07/29/2014, and 11/01/2016) noted the same operation and maintenance issues for the treatment lagoon and outfall structure. UCS, Inc. became the permittee for this wastewater treatment facility as of August 11, 2004. On December 4, 2019, the MRO of the DWR issued a Notice of Continuing Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-2019-PC-0759) for failure to address the noncompliance concerns documented in the previous inspections and has not met the timeline which was agreed upon after an onsite meeting on November 13, 2018. 3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or air quality; The entire treatment system is in a state of disrepair resulting in the potential for significant environmental harm to ground and surface water. In addition to the maintenance concerns, due to the overall condition of the lagoon, the groundwater quality is a concern. The permittee was asked in the current NOV to submit a plan describing the proposed installation of three shallow/water table monitoring wells for the purpose of assessing groundwater quality as related to operation of the wastewater system 4) The cost of rectifying the damage; The cost to hire an engineer to assess the current state of the system, as well as, the cost to upgrade and/or repair the documented maintenance defects. DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; Inadequate data exists to determine the exact amount of money saved by noncompliance. However, this figure would include the cost of the necessary repairs to the lagoon treatment system including the outfall structure and chlorine disinfection. 6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; UCS, Inc. has willfully and knowingly discharged untreated wastewater into the South Fork of the Catawba River. Violations noted from previous inspections, NOVs and the previous enforcement have continued. 7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and Repeated NOVs have been sent for operation and maintenance issues. Violations have continued since the previous enforcement on April 4, 2019. An NOV was sent for continuing violations noted during an inspection conducted on November 13, 2019. 8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. Item 8 Hours of staff A time 3 Hours of Assistant Supervisor Time 3 Hours of Supervisor Time Central Office Review and Processing Total Enforcement Costs 9/13/2020 Enforcement Cost: DocuSigned by: pblyavl 8FB19B649DD2478... Hourly Total Rate $38.61 $308.88 $49.27 $147.81 $59.09 $177.27 $100.00 $733.96 Date Jeff Poupart, Section Chief Water Quality Permitting Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. DANI£L SMITH Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Lawrence Schwartz UCS, Inc. P.O. Box 657 Lincolnton, NC 28092 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality 9/13/2020 SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalty for Continuing Violations of Permit Conditions NPDES Permit NCO022934 UCS, Inc./UCS Main Plant Case No.: PC-2020-0006 Gaston County Dear Mr. Schwartz: This letter transmits a notice of a civil penalty assessed against UCS, Inc. in the amount of $24,733.96 (includes $733.96 in enforcement costs). This assessment is based upon the following facts: On May 25, 2018, Mooresville Regional Office (MRO), Water Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS) of Division of Water Resources issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to UCS, Inc. This NOV was issued in response to observations from an inspection on May 22, 2018. These observations concerned the operation and maintenance of the lagoon treatment system and the outfall structure. These observations are outlined in the attached Findings and Decision and Civil Penalty Assessment (F&D CPA) documents. On August 1, 2018, MRO staff met with UCS, Inc. representatives (at the UCS, Inc. business site) to discuss the inspection findings and required corrective actions needed to achieve compliance with NPDES Permit NC0022934. MRO staff issued a follow-up email on the same day (August 1, 2018) to UCS, Inc. that requested information on the condition of the treatment facility. The requested information is outlined in the attached F&D CPA. On November 13, 2018, a meeting was held with MRO staff, UCS, Inc. representatives (at the UCS, Inc. business site), and consultants with Shield Engineering. The consultants were able to determine that the influent flow is gravity fed into the lagoon structure. They were able to determine that the effluent structure has a leak and is not operating properly. At the meeting, MRO staff discussed with the UCS, Inc. representatives and the consultants a compliance schedule in order to evaluate and provide information on the facility. As a result, a follow-up email outlining the compliance schedule was sent to the permittee the next day. On November 14, 2018, a compliance schedule was sent by email to the permittee and is outlined in the attached F&D CPA. After the facility failed to meet the December 1, 2018 deadline, MRO staff made attempts to contact USC, Inc. by phone and email (December 5, 2018 and December 13, 2018). To date, none of DWR's attempts to make contact were successful. D✓� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources E Q512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611 NORTH CAHD!.INA � 0"""m DfF WM—Wl Quakily 919.707,9000 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 IV -If. 3CHWU Z Page 2 of 4 On December 19, 2018, MRO of DWR issued a Continuing Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce (NOV-2018-PC-0480) for violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part IL Section C.2. to UCS, Inc. On March 5, 2019, the MRO of the DWR issued a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce (NOV-2019- PC-0176) for violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part II Section B.8. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee failed to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. On December 4, 2019, the MRO of the DWR issued a Notice of Continuing Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-2019-PC-0759) for failure to address the noncompliance concerns documented in the previous inspections and has not met the timeline which was agreed upon after an onsite meeting on November 13, 2018. The non-compliance resulted in the assessment of civil penalties (PC-2019-0020). By failing to meet the timeline, the facility continues to be in violation of NPDES Permit NC0022934, Part II, Section B.8 "Duty to Provide Information" by failing to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against UCS, Inc. (UCS) pursuant to NCGS. 143- 215.3(a)(9) and NCGS 143B-282.1(b)(8). Based upon the above facts, the Division concludes as a matter of law that UCS violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NC0022934, in the manner and extent shown above. In accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), a civil penalty may be assessed against any person who violates the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1(a). Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, the Division hereby makes the following civil penalty assessment against UCS, Inc.: $ 8,000.00 For continuing violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part II Section B.8. Duty to Provide Information by failing to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. $ 16,000.00 For continuing violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part II Section C.2. Proper Operation and Maintenance by failing to properly operate and maintain the wastewater treatment plant. $ 733.96 Enforcement Costs $ 24,733.96 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty the Division has taken into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are: (1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation; (2) The duration and gravity of the violation; (3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or air quality; (4) The cost of rectifying the damage; DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 IV -If. 3GII W UI LZ Page 3 of 4 (5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; (6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; (7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and (8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following: 1. Submit payment of the penalty: Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment to the attention of. Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Section 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 OR 2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such request: Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation and agreement that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed below. In determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors shall be considered: (1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 14313-282.1(b) was wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner; (2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation; (3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident; (4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or (5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions. Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding the case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission. In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil Penalties, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address: Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Section 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 IV -If. 3cI1 W UI LZ Page 4 of 4 K' 3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings: If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document, you must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may be faxed provided the original and one copy of the document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is: Office of Administrative Hearings 6714 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714 Telephone (919) 733-2698 Facsimile: (919) 733-3478 AND Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to: Mr. William F. Lane, General Counsel Department of Environmental Quality 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the petition. Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action. Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period of this assessment. If you have any questions, please contact Derek Denard at 919-707-3618 or via e-mail (derek.denard@ncdenr.gov). Sincerely, DocuSigned by: pbtyo 8FB19B649DD2478... Jeff Poupart, Section Chief Water Quality Permitting Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ ATTACHMENTS cc: DWR NPDES Enforcement File Gaston County Health Department cc: DWR Laserfiche w/attachments DWR MRO / Corey Basinger [corey.basinger@ncdenr.gov]; Ori Tuvia [ori.tuvia@ncdenr.gov]; Andrew Pitner [andrew.pitner@ncdenr.gov] DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY OF GASTON IN THE MATTER OF ) CASE NO. PC-2020-0006 UCS, INC. ) FINDINGS AND DECISION AND ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF: ) NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0022934 ) Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I, Jeff Poupart, of the Division of Water Resources (hereby known as DWR), make the following: L FINDING OF FACT A. UCS, Inc. is a person organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina. B. The UCS Main Plant discharges to South Fork Catawba River, a Class WS-IV waterbody in the Catawba River Basin. C. On September 18, 2015, UCS, Inc. was issued NPDES Permit Number NC0022934 for the operation of an existing 0.3-acre waste stabilization lagoon followed by chlorination disinfection and the discharge of wastewater located at the UCS Main Plant facility pursuant to the application received on January 30, 2015, in accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina. D. On May 25, 2018, Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (hereby known as MRO) of DWR issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to UCS, Inc. This NOV was issued in response to observations from an inspection on May 22, 2018, which included the following: • There is woody vegetation, animal burrows, and erosion on the side slopes/dikes. • The outfall structure (where the chlorine disinfection is located) is deteriorating and needs maintenance. • The access to the outfall structure (pier bridge) appears unstable. • The outfall structure, which contains the chlorine disinfection box, is part of permitted wastewater system and must be maintained. • The Permittee should conduct an engineering evaluation of the system to verify its integrity, which includes: o confirming the path/piping for influent wastewater to the lagoon o assessing the sludge level in the lagoon o assessing the structural stability of the lagoon slopes/dikes after vegetation removal o evaluation of the outfall structure. Page 1 of 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 • The permittee must locate the effluent pipe location. E. On August 1, 2018, MRO staff met with UCS, Inc. representatives (at the UCS, Inc. business site) to discuss the inspection findings and required corrective actions needed to achieve compliance with NPDES Permit NC0022934. MRO staff issued a follow-up email on the same day (August 1, 2018) to UCS, Inc. that requested the following information on the condition of the facility: • The permittee was to confirm whether the wastewater is gravity fed or passes through the pump station. • The permittee was to have a Professional Engineer evaluate the status of lagoon (structural stability of the lagoon slopes/dike and sludge level). • The permittee was to have a Professional Engineer evaluate the outfall structure to determine if any leaks are present. • The permittee was to determine whether or not the system is discharging, and if so, where precisely is the location of the discharge pipe. F. On November 13, 2018, a meeting was held with MRO staff, UCS, Inc. representatives (at the UCS, Inc. business site), and consultants with Shield Engineering. The consultants were able to determine that the influent flow is gravity fed into the lagoon structure. They were able to determine that the effluent structure has a leak and is not operating properly. At the meeting, MRO staff discussed with the UCS, Inc. representatives and the consultants a compliance schedule in order to evaluate and provide information on the facility. As a result, a follow-up email outlining the compliance schedule was sent to the permittee the next day (November 14, 2018). G. On November 14, 2018, the following compliance schedule was sent by email to the permittee: • By December 1, 2018, pump the water and investigate the chamber located behind the old gas chlorine building. If the effluent pipe is accessible, evaluate the flow passing through the pipe as well as the potential to chlorinate the effluent for sampling purposes. In addition, attempt to locate the discharge point of the effluent pipe into the river. • By January 10, 2019, submit a timeline to the Mooresville Regional Office outlining the chosen path forward for the facility to achieve full compliance with NPDES Permit NC0022934. The timeline will indicate if the facility intends to achieve compliance by abandoning the pond and install septic with drain fields (approved by Gaston County), which will allow NPDES Permit NC0022934 to be rescinded, or a timeline to address the concerns listed in NOV-2018-PC-0184 regarding the condition of the lagoon and the chlorine contact structure. • In addition, by January 10, 2019, please submit a plan describing the proposed installation of three shallow/water table monitoring wells for the purpose of assessing groundwater quality as related to operation of the wastewater system. H. After the facility failed to meet the December 1, 2018 deadline, MRO staff made attempts to contact USC, Inc. by phone and email (December 5, 2018 and December 13, 2018). To date, none of DWR's attempts to make contact were successful. Page 2 of 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 L On December 19, 2018, MRO of DWR issued a Continuing Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce (NOV-2018-PC-0480) for violations of NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part IL Section C.2. to UCS, Inc. J. On March 5, 2019, MRO of DWR issued a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce (NOV-2019-PC-0176) for violations of NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part II Section B.B. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee failed to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. K. On April 4, 2019, MRO of DWR issued an Assessment of Civil Penalty for Violations of Permit Conditions for violations as listed above in the amount of $9,683.68 (includes $1,683.68 in enforcement costs). L. On December 4, 2019, the MRO of the DWR issued a Notice of Continuing Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-2019-PC-0759) for failure to address the noncompliance concerns documented in the previous inspections and has not met the timeline which was agreed upon after an onsite meeting on November 13, 2018. The non- compliance resulted in the assessment of civil penalties (PC-2019-0020). By failing to meet the timeline, the facility continues to be in violation of NPDES Permit NC0022934, Part II, Section B.8 "Duty to Provide Information" by failing to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Division documented that the facility is continuously and knowingly discharging untreated wastewater into the South Fork of the Catawba River. In accordance with Part II, Section C.2 of the subject permit, proper Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of the WWTP is required. The following areas of concern with respect to Operation and Maintenance should be addressed: • Lagoon Maintenance: There is woody vegetation, animal burrows, and erosion on the side slopes/dikes. • Outfall Structure: The outfall structure is deteriorating and needs maintenance. The access to the outfall structure appears unstable. Piping of the wastewater is leaking causing bypass of the chlorination box which is part of permitted wastewater system. The chlorination box must be part of the treatment process and must be properly maintained. • Effluent pipe and sampling: Facility staff must locate the effluent pipe discharge point at the receiving water. If the pipe is located above the river, the effluent pipe discharge could be used for sampling. If the effluent pipe is under the river level, an alternative sampling location must be evaluated. Regardless of the discharge location, the facility must conduct regular sampling in accordance with Part I, Section A.1 of the subject permit. M. To date the Permittee has failed to furnish DWR the information requested on November 14, 2018. In addition, no response to the NOV sent on December 4, 2019 has been received. Page 3 of 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 N. NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0022934 contains the following relevant permit conditions: NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part II Section B.B. Duty to Provide Information The Permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee shall also furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon request, copies of records required by this permit [40 CFR 122.41(h)]. NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part II. Section C.2. Prober Operation and Maintenance The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operations and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the Permittee to install and operate backup or auxiliary facilities only when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. O. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled: $733.96. Based upon the above Finding of Fact, I, Jeff Poupart, make the following: IL CONCLUSION OF LAW A. UCS, Inc. is a `person' within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212 (4). B. South Fork Catawba River located at the site constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-212 (6). C. UCS, Inc. was issued NPDES Permit No. NC0022934 in accordance with G. S. 143- 215.1(a) for the operation and maintenance of a wastewater treatment system and the discharge of wastewater in compliance with permit limits and conditions. D. UCS, Inc. violated NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part II Section B.B. Duty to Provide Information by failing to furnish to DWR information requested on November 14, 2018 and December 4, 2018. E. UCS, Inc. violated NPDES Permit NC0022934 Part II Section C.2. Proper Operation and Maintenance by failing to properly operate and maintain the wastewater treatment plant. F. UCS, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A (a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation per day may be assessed against a person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1, or who violates or fails to Page 4 of 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of such permit or any other permit or certification issued pursuant to authority conferred by this Part. G. The State's enforcement cost in this matter may be assessed against UCS, Inc. pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3 (a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8). H. Jeff Poupart of the Division of Water Resources, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter. Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I, make the following: III. DECISION Accordingly, UCS, Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of: $ 8,000.00 For continuing violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part II Section B.8. Duty to Provide Information by failing to furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. $ 16,000.00 For violations of NPDES Permit NCO022934 Part II Section C.2. Proper Operation and Maintenance by failing to properly operate and maintain the wastewater treatment plant. $ 733.96 Enforcement Costs $ 24,733.96 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of penalty, I considered the factors set out in G.S. 14313-282.1(b), which are: (1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violations; (2) The duration and gravity of the violations; (3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or air quality; (4) The cost of rectifying the damage; (5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; (6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally; (7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and (8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures Page 5 of 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: DA701 BC9-C667-447C-AAFB-F3721AD1 E852 9/13/2020 Date DocuSigned by: J' pbupaf 8F8198649DD2478... Jeff Poupart, Section Chief Water Quality Permitting Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ Page 6 of 6 Docu5�". ii S E C up E D Certificate Of Completion Envelope Id: DA701BC9C667447CAAFBF3721AD1E852 Status: Completed Subject: Please DocuSign: NCO022934 PC-2020-0006 Assessment Factors.docx, NCO022934 PC-2020-0006 Enforce... Source Envelope: Document Pages: 12 Signatures: 3 Envelope Originator: Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 0 Derek Denard AutoNav: Enabled 217 W. Jones Street Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled Raleigh, NC 27699 Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) derek.denard@ncdenr.gov IP Address: 149.168.204.10 Record Tracking Status: Original Holder: Derek Denard Location: DocuSign 9/3/2020 7:55:23 PM derek.denard@ncdenr.gov Signer Events Signature Timestamp Jeff Poupart Sent: 9/3/2020 8:03:52 PM jeff.poupart@ncdenr.gov UDOCUS,g"edby: tff rayaV'f Viewed: 9/13/2020 8:33:11 AM DWR 8FB19B649DD2478... Signed: 9/13/2020 8:34:09 AM DEQ Security Level: Email, Account Authentication Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style (None) Using IPAddress: 24.162.252.119 Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp Witness Events Signature Timestamp Notary Events Signature Timestamp Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 9/3/2020 8:03:52 PM Certified Delivered Security Checked 9/13/2020 8:33:11 AM Signing Complete Security Checked 9/13/2020 8:34:09 AM Completed Security Checked 9/13/2020 8:34:09 AM Payment Events Status Timestamps