WQ0000430_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (4)

Y � .
awe C�
State of North Carolina
_ Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 12, 1991
Ms. Janice Hovis
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
Our records show that Permit No. WQ0000430 was issued on
December 6, 1991 for the land application of sludge generated by
your wastewater treatment facility. The purpose of this letter
is to advise you of the importance of the Permit and the
liabilities in the event of failure to comply with the terms and
conditions of .the Permit. If you have not already done so, it
is requested that you and other appropriate employees thoroughly
read the Permit.
The Permit sets forth specific performance standards,
operation and maintenance requirements, monitoring requirements,
including annual reporting and groundwater monitoring activities
to be performed by the Permittee, plus general conditions
applicable to non -discharge permits. Failure to comply with the
terms and conditions of the Permit subjects the Permittee to
enforcement action pursuant to Section 143-215.6 of the North
Carolina General Statutes. A civil penalty of up to $10,000.per
violation may be assessed for such violations.
Please note that the subject Permit expires on November 301
1996. Part VI No. 11 of the Permit requires that�a renewal -
request be submitted at least six (6) months prior to
expiration. Also the Permit is non -transferable until such time.
that the Permittee has requested a name change,to the new
Permittee.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, N.C. 28115 • Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

X. C. IDEPT. OF NA
MAX
'-SOURCES AND
Zjr" y DEVELOP
,�owr rI' MENT
State of North Carolina D_r" I :I. 1991.
Department of Environment, Health and Natur 1 Resourcesz
Division of Environmental Management VISION
OF
y�rfGrf�t�Mi111AGEfNH
512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 276�� lik aial� �fFl��
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary George T. Everett, Ph.D.
December 6, 1991 Director
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Dear Ms. Hovis: Lincoln County
In accordance with your application received July 9, 1991, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0000430, dated December 6, 1991, to City of Cherryville for the operation of a
land application of sludge program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until November 30, 1996, and
shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular
attention to the monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for
collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance
problems. Issuance of this permit hereby voids Permit No. WQ0000430 Issued November 27,
1990.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands
are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John
Seymour at 919/ 733-5083.
cc: Lincoln County Health Department
gores.__ viTteg"i nal�®ff
Groundwater Section
Training and Certification
Facilities Assessment Unit
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

7. The following buffers zones shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet from residences under separate ownership for surface application
method; however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimum of
100 feet upon written consent of the owner,
b) 200 feet from residences under separate ownership for injection method;
however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimum of 100 feet
upon written consent of the owner,
c) 100 feet from "SA and SB" classified waters and public surface water supplies
for both methods,
d) 50 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes, rivers,
and surface water drainage ways for injection method,
e) 100 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes, rivers
and surface water drainage ways for surface application method,
f) 100 feet from property lines for both methods; however, this requirement may
be reduced upon written concurrence from the adjoining property owner,
g) 50 feet from public right of ways for surface application methods,
h) 25 feet from public right of ways for subsurface disposal methods,
i) 10 feet from upslope interceptor drains and surface water diversions for both
methods,
j) 25 feet from downslope interceptor drains, surface water diversions,
groundwater drainage systems and surface drainage ditches for both methods.
8. A copy of this permit shall be kept at the land application site when sludge is being
applied during the life of this permit. A spill prevention and control plan shall be
kept in all sludge transport and application vehicles.
9. Specific sludge application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site
prior to and during sludge application.
10. No sludge at any time shall be stored at any application site.
H. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REOUIREMENTS
1. The facilities and disposal sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all
times,
2. A suitable vegetative cover, as listed in condition II 3, shall be maintained in
accordance with the crop management plan approved by this Division.

3.
The application rates shall not exceed the following for the specified crops:
a
5
cl=
PAN s acre ear
Wheat (small grain)
100
Barley (small grain)
100
Milo (small grain)
100
OatsN(small grain)
100
Soybeans
150
Corn (silage and grain)
200
Alfalfa
250
Sorghum
120
Sudex (silage)
200
Sudex(hay)
160
Fescue grass
250
Timothy grass
200
Orchard grass
200
Rye grass
200
Blue grass
220
Coastal Bermuda grass
350
Cotton
100
Forest areas (hard and soft woods)
75
No sludges other than the following are hereby approved for land application in
accordance with this permit:
Source County
Cherryville Gaston
Permit Estimated
Number Vol zme (dry tons/vearl
NC0044440 326 (1,000000 gal./yr.)
The lifetime heavy metal loadings shall not exceed the following for the
corresponding Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC):
Parameter
CEC < 5
Lead (lbs/acre)
500
Zinc (lbs/acre)
250
Copper (lbs/acre)
125
Nickel (lbs/acre)
125
Cadmium (lbs/acre)
4.5
6. Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee
shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible
charge of the wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of
the type and grade at least equivalent to the classification assigned to the wastewater
treatment facilities by the Certification Commission.
7. Adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed or stored sludge material into any surface waters.
8. Animals shall not be grazed on sludge applied land within a 30-day period
following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing
shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access after each application.
9. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced within twenty-four (24) hours after
application on lands with no cover crop established.
10. For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, sludge
may be applied only during periods of dry weather. The sludge must be
incorporated into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of application.
3

11. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application
sites during active site use and for the 12-month period following the last sludge
application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
12. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff from
conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent property or
into the surface waters.
13. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or until 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency sludge disposal
measures must first be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
14. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge
application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5 provided a
sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, sludge
and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, sludge, soil, or plant tissue
analyses) deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to
insure protection of the environment will be established and an acceptable sampling
and reporting schedule shall be followed. If monitoring data indicates minimal or
no concern to the Division, reduction of monitoring requirements may be pursued
after two annual reporting periods.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all disposal activities.
These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following
information:
a) source of sludge
b) date of sludge application
c) location of sludge application (site, field, or zone #)
d) method of application
e) weather conditions
f) soil conditions
g) type of crop or crop to be grown on field
h) volume of sludge applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
i) annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of sludge, annual and cumulative
pounds/acre of each heavy metal (which shall include, but not be limited to
lead,nickel, cadmium, copper and zinc), annual pounds/acre of plant available
nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied to each field.
3. A representative annual soils analysis (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be
conducted of each site receiving sludge in the respective calendar year and the
results maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. The
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the
following parameters:
% Base Saturation
Manganese
Magnesium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Phosphorus
Sodium
Potassium
Nickel
Lead
Cadmium
Zinc
Copper
pH
Calcium
4

4. A quarterly sludge analysis and annual Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) analysis shall be conducted by the Permittee and the results maintained on
file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. If land application occurs at a
frequency less than quarterly, sludge analysis will be required for each instance of
land application. The sludge analysis shall include but is not necessarily limited to
the following parameters:
% total solids
Magnesium
Chlorides
Sulfate
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cadmium
Chromium
Sodium
Calcium
Total Nitrogen
Ammonia Nitrogen
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
The TCLP analysis shall include
the following parameters:
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Cadmium
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chromium
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
Cresol
2,4-D
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Endrin
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachloroethane
Lead
Lindane
Mercury
Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Selenium
Silver
Tetrachloroethylene
Toxaphene
Trichloroethylene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Vinyl chloride
5. Three copies of all monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in conditions
1111, III 2, III 3 and III 4 shall be submitted annually on or before March 1 of
the following year to the following address:
NC Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
6. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville, Regional Office
telephone no. 704/ 663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of
the occurrence of any of the following:

N. C. DEPT. of NATURAi
P.ESOU^ "ES AND
I QI
State of North Carolina m
Department of Environment, health and Natural Resources, -
:61 ir:i :: Division of Environmental Management r,�;,AY..,..;. •`''"'•°•'} _
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-05326--"°'p f �L �''1:'1 OIEECE
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ms.Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Dear Ms. Hovis:
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
September 30, 1991
Subject WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge Renewal
Gaston County
The Permits and Engineering Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application.
The following items must be addressed before we can complete our review. Please note
that these items must be received by November 29, 1991, in order to prevent your project form
being returned.
1. As required in the current permit, WQ0000430 section I condition 10, the City of
Cherryville was required to submit an evaluation as to the subject wastewater treatment facilities
ability to stabilize sludge to meet PSRP (process to significantly reduce pathogens). Environmental
Waste Disposal, Inc. on behalf of the City of Cherryville did provide a evaluation to the Division.
However, the process described is not like any of the usual PSRP processes listed by the EPA.
The EPA does allow process that can show equivalent treatment as the usual PSRP processes listed
(Code of Federal Regulations; 40 CFR 257 appendix II). To provide the subject permit renewal
this office must verify that the City of Cherryville's sludge facilities can meet PSRP. Please
provide a letter to the EPA through this office requesting that the EPA give a ruling of equivalency
for the existing PSRP process, or show this office that the existing sludge facilities meet PSRP or
better by one of the usual methods listed in 40 CFR.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call me at 919/ 733-5083.
incerely
John Seymour
Environmental Engineer
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Date: September 5,_1991
NON -DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Lincoln
Permit No. WQ0000430
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
2. Date of Investigation: August 30, 1991
3. Report Prepared By: W. Allen Hardy, Environmental Engineer I
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: John Menne,
Environmental Waste Recycling (EWR), Project Manager (919)
998-8184
5. Directions to Site: From Lincolnton travel Highway 182 to the
intersection of Crouse Rd.(SR 1167). All sites are within a
half mile of this intersection.
6. Disposal Site(s), List for all disposal sites:
Latitude: 350 26' 10"
Longitude: 810 23' 15"
These coordinates are centrally located within the fields used
for land application. Most fields are in sight of each other
and contiguous.
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F13NW
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): N/A
8. Topography (location map or topographic indicating
relationship to 100 year flood plain included): The
topography varies from gently rolling to steep hills with
slopes from 2-15%. It did not appear that any of the sites
were in or near the flood plain.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling and Water Supply Well: There
were homes located approximately 300 feet from the disposal
areas as well as water supply wells.

I
I I �
it V
4 Page Two
10. Watershed Stream Basin Information:
a. Watershed Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 03-08-35
C. Distance to surface water from disposal system: N/A
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater, sludge or contaminated soil:
40% Domestic
60% Industrial
a. Volume: Approximately 1,888,500 gallons (Applied in
1990)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: The
facility presently has two industries which discharge
industrial wastewater into the plant. Travis Knits
(textile) generates approximately 400,000 gpd and
Carolina Freight (truck washing) generates approximately
20,000 gpd.
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: A review of
the most recent sludge analysis submitted by EWR did not
reveal any waste constituents present in levels
considered as being toxic.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Production Rates (industrial discharges only) in Pounds Per
Day: N/A
3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and
Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): N/A
5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Sludge will be
transported to the disposal sites in sealed tanker trucks
owned and operated by Environmental Waste Recycling, Inc. and
then either surface applied or injected depending on the
crops.
6. Treatment Plant Classification: Less Than 5 Points; Div
Rating (include rating sheet). N/A
7. SIC Code(s): N/A
Wastewater'Code(s): N/A

�y .
Mcc, i lfS U' I 1,
a
fl, p�jD,i1:a(
t
Tole,
f✓b i, b 4 1
1 17L, Ceft-�r,,/
91
N. C. DEPT. Or, NAT
U,
AN
VELOP,ifENT
D1�7SICff OF fB;J"�;f°,;Eft;,i IA.JJGE69ENl
�luOitE�ai��E FiC10iVni OFFICE
r, a f I oy % r j d `,r �� f1 t^V/y V'
l!
1I�1 Gco 0
7le9sf rev I'tW Ph�� �CI�L✓,� c vriz
r G� 8?G f/t'
sr �1�. , y / , �

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett,Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
July 11, 1991
MS JANICE HOVIS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 SOUTH MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28021
Subject: Application No. WQ0000430
A Sludge
Sludge -Land Application
Lincoln County
Dear MS HOVIS:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on July 9, 1991. This application has been assigned the number shown above.
Please refer to this number when making inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to John Seymour for a detailed engineering review. A technical
acknowledgement will be forthcoming. If this acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30)
days, please contact the engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the
Division.
If you have any questions, please contact John Seymour at [phone].
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Environmental Waste Recycle
Sincerely,
�f) Donald Safrit, P.E.
( Supervisor, Permits and Engineering Unit
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27637, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r
Environmental Waste Recycling, Inc.
Julv 1, 1991
Ms. Carolyn McCaskill
Permits and Engineering Section
Division of Environmental Management
NC DEHNR
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Subject: WQ0000430-Permit Renewal
Land Application of WWTP Sludge
City of Cherryville, NC
Gaston, NC
Dear Ms. McCaskill:
Enclosed please find the materials necessary for permit
renewal of WQ0000430 Land Application of WWTP Sludge
generated by the City of Cherryville, North Carolina.
r f
J'JL 1991
Quadruplicate copies of the permit renewal forms are provided
along with a check for the $250.00 processing fee.
Please contact our office if any additional information is
required to complete the renewal. Thank you.
Sincerely,
--117 /41AZE ~
Greg Mackin
Technical Services
Rt. 4, Box 37-B • Advance, NC 27006 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

4 1 � CO... )-)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (corporation, individual, or other): City of Cherryville, NC
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is legally
responsible for the facility and its compliance): X J a
O_J Ma Vt 6t� e- V
3. Mailing Address: 116 South Mountain Street
City: Cherryville State:
Telephone No.: ( 7 0 4
4. Application Date: June 1991
435-4181
NC
Zip:
5. Fee Submitted: $
28021
250
6. Name, address, & county of facility where sludge originated. Should
be referenced on any plans/specs., analytical results, Land Owner Agreements, etc.:
Cherryville Wastewater Treatment Plant
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021 Gaston
County
7 . County (s) where sludge will be land applied: _ Lincoln
8. Latitude: 390,221 ; Longitude 810
30'
of land application sites.
For multiple sites attach a listing of the sites and a latitude and longitude for each.
9. Owner and address of lands where sludge will be land applied. For multiple sites attach
a listing:
Stowe Leonhardt/John P. Beam, Sr.
Rt. 4, Box 473 Cherryville, NC 28021
FORM: LARS 4/91
Page 1 of 25

b
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 2 (4/91) '
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Permit No. (will be completed by DEM):
2. Specify whether project is: new; X renewal*; modification.
*If renewal, complete only sections I, H, land owner agreement, & applicant
signature (on pg 24). Submit only pgs. 1, 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24 (original and 3
copies of each). Engineer signature not required for renewal.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an
WQ0000430
existing permit, list the existing permit number and issue date Nov. 27, 1990
4. Specify whether the applicant is X public or private.
III. PERMIT FEE INFORMATION:
1. Number of Total Acres on which residual solids are proposed to be land applied under
the authority of this permit (include both land currently permitted and proposed lands):
230.7
acres
2. The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).
IV. SITE INFORMATION:
1. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location of each site in
relation to at least two geographical references (numbered roads, named streams/rivers,
etc.).
2. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached. This map
must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or
25% of total site relief (whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines;
all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways and all dwellings within 500 feet
of the land application areas; and all buffers.
Note: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the
sites, larger buffers may be required:_
a) 400 feet -from any habitable residence for surface sludge application,
200 feet from any habitable residence for subsurface sludge injection
b) 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply
including wells.
2 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
iiortb caroliva DiDisiott of
C-aWrouutva to l Aa nagemeta t
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND.APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee:
City of Cherryville, NC
Contact Person: Ralph Childers
Address ofPermittee: 116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
Cherryville's WWTP Sludge
S ite IDNumber: 1-16
Field Number: 1-16
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
Along Hwy 182, East of Hwy 274
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application: John P . Beam Jr.
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: Corn Silage, Small Grains and Hay
Intended use or disposition of crops: E i ve s t o c k Feed
111111111111111111111111111l11l111l1111l1111111111111111I11111111111111I11111111111111111111111l11111111ii1111111111
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
City of-Cherryville,-NC
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Pemuttee receives, in consideration, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 {4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
1l11111111fI111111111111111f1111111111111f111llflllllliillllll11111111111111l1111111111111l1111111111111111111111111
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials -or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge.or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
20 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter - and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
RESTRICTIONS:
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
I II I III1111II111111111111111111111111111111I I I I I II I If III III III I I I I I I I I II II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
Permittee to apply siudgetresidual to my lands as specified herein
d Owner
NORTH CAROLINA,
L r ti(,C)l-
COUNTY,
L the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that �_ _ ��.��r'
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand an oj�5pipl seal this
X
- " NOTARY Z
My commission Expires xP�JBLIC_
x SfiL��y covN,�,
Z7,
Date
day of
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
I. XJd-a t c e, H o U 1 a have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
City of Cherryville WWTP
Permittee
x � 9
Date
22 of 25

09
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4191)
r-ortb (Carolina Dibi-sion of
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: City of Cherryville, NC
Contact Person' Ralph Childers
Address of Permittee:- 116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
Cherryville's WWTP Sludge
Site ID Number: 1-16
Field Number: 1-16
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
Along Hwy 182, East of Hwy 274
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application:_ Stowe Leonhodt
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: Corn Silage, Small Grains and Hay
Intended use or disposition of crops: E i v e s t o c k Feed
Illlllllllllllltlilllllllli111111111l11illlll11111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIt1111111111t1111l111111111111111
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
City of Cherryville, NC
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the
use of theland described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels. this Land owner's Agreement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 (4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
1111111111111111I111111111111II1111111111111fill II1I11III fill ifI1111111I11111111111111III 1111111111I1I111II111111I11
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each. parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials -or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement
I The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge.or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the _
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM .
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
20 of 25

I
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the .
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter - and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
I111111111i1lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111II11IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111illllll1111111111l11llllil111111111111111111lIIIIIII
RESTRICTIONS:
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
�2
seal this Z 7 day of
lllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillillllllllll[III III III IIIIIIllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllill
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby giant permission to the
Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herei .
Owner
27-
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, L /� G O (m COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that Z-7 k /z6E
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and oicial
A
My commission Expires
JL..Ne-
, 19
I have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. /
Lessee
Date
I, )(Jdih t c e, /4 o tl 1 s have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
City of Cherryville WWTP
Permittee
Date
22 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 24 (4/91)
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
City:
Telephone No.
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I,
S tate:
, attest that this application for
Zip:
has been reviewed by me and is accurate
and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain
portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of
these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have
judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Registration No.
Print Name of Engineer -
Seal and Signature (specify date):
Applicant's Certvoul-,5
cation:
I, X �Q V i c , attest that this application for
City of-Cherryville Land Application of WWTP sludge
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting
information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as -
incomplete. /1
Signature x �Iy i Date &
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 919/733-5083
24 of 25

August 16, 1991
Mr. John Seymour
Environmental Engineer
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Subject: City of Cherryville Renewal
of WQ Permit No. 430
Dear Mr. Seymour:
Sal
-
91 AVC 20 q,10: 3
In response to your letter dated July 31, 1991, to Ms. Janice
Hovis, City Manager of the City of Cherryville, I am submitting the
following information.
1. Copy of City of Cherryville 1990 Annual Report;
2. 1991 Sludge Analysis, 1991 TCLP Analysis, Sludge Monitoring
reports and Soil Analysis.
In 1991, we have applied sludge to fields 11, 13, 14, and 15 owned
by Mr. John Beam. This is the only activity for 1991.
I hope that this material will supply the required information for
the completion of your review. If you should require any further
information, please let me know.
Sincerely,
George A. Dameron
Technical Services
cc: Ms. Janice Hovis
��
Rt. 4, Box 37-B • Advance, NC 27006 e [phone] • FAX [phone] g
Printed on
Recycled Paper

irw
Env ro n ft� , S e:.
Disposal, Inc*
D
- t,
Box 170 C Advance,.NV006 ­ [phone]
k
FAX: [phone]
C= OF CHERRYVILLE,'NC
. . ...... .
'V.rUtilization Program Agricultura. Y.
%'­`ANNUAL -REPORT
PERMIT -NO. WQ0000430
)lease find enclosed the -annual report for the Agricultural
itilization Program for the ,-City'of Cherryville, North Carolina.
:n accordance with the North:,',",dairiolina Department of Environ-_
lent„ Health and Natural Resources -and Permit No. WQ0000430,-'
I
Lnvironmental Waste Di-sposal_;-,,: ,.�;nc.(EWD) has removed, trans-
i ited and land applied a­__,t6't­al.of 1 1,888,500 gallons of sludge
!rom the Cherryville, NC WWTP-` 7.7he- sludge was applied to a
total of 133.2 acres.
televant testing and results'7in.accordance with permit
requirements are included-.' '*.h ' quiremen e package. Representative
lamp 'frequent,. -contingent on
les were - taken quarterly ess
" - 11 Yl.'_L�-,..-
I•- frequency of sludge 'for Ag-icultural Utilization
e ..
d removal r
ro'u'gh land application for any 'given client.
=..remains
committed to -providing efficient, environmentally
;ound*Agricultural Utilization programs. Additional comments
ind.Suggestions'in regards to the management of this project
fill be gratefully appreciated._
'hank YOU,
Iraii e Dr aman
w4dident
1.
`7 '

MWT
.:x �
i r;f s a."-yh },....2�t •1`,,.. r I K di �l 4+ 3.. $t t .< ..,i'7" ,f 7fti-.Zk 1 f. �I~F ia', J h-.N Ln, f 'F iL.y ij i. .y: PS.1
4,t.
t •�:. L_!:� K t:��� C .-�t�e+.tyy-�,Fya Ly ' r,r.4 + _ r r !:.} �- = <a .4`+ r �. f.?' f i J : d " .i e rI w."i 1"%
_ - 5 , ? .�^f f,�L,., ei.,Y 1 p � u5`. ' l -' �.. �,�• � {fy�.. +�' _.� - � S'y��. ).
7 „ !y -./ �.•+`,%'`$tm .i S.TLF'�. z.{°f� ac
!N.
. � '�� al'� � 4^f��t'�$�31 E �i .� � h'i �' S" 1y�jy{��• �°.� nsif �'� �. b ^.�G �+"�w} Fx f
Y 4`
4y.;; ,� � � � � �o � ate• ��+• .. � ��:
g f� oo ono _ o
._
c�� oo ►-• o cn cn o 0 0 o r
w a'o r+ oo
a I $ s O c�+ s s s o s s N M
in �n
+. II 11 11 11 II II 11 II 11 II II
N 1
Doll
p,
J to N kD N 1-4
ly
8 8o88d888 A
M
Li
o` 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0
. . .
8' 888888888888888 S 88888SSS88 s.
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
11 �.� 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 II II II II II 11 II II 11 11 II II II _ 11 11 II 11 II 11 11
O ,O O O OO O O O O O O N . FC N
O O
co co $SGB0O g pO ul O�oOwl �A wO1 Ql �C
O

I
i
I
MORN ; WIN* .4
t ".. � y r- . i k�4'fi� - �yy�y\ � � s• �r S"'I�-y', ,� 3 ya• ^�e F'4,� .1� , I C ' r ,..,_ +3, a:`. a �";,.. �+ ,� � fit•. F .y N' a`',. vs `'re "q•�Y�^ �.- y' u �a ...
REPORT: NUMBER .. , : � i � � �� t�.. $'s ' "'��',Y 4y}#� ..-ux�t�'`hA� Tlb +''- t $ .i yAi t � a. t � ,�R` � " . .i' yA ' I _;,� r 1 ��*§'�•i i•�1 : '�` ���'"' R � •
sS 'w�;A'ftL EASTERN AGRICULTURAL"LABORATORIES"INC..r�
LrF = "z�t �. ti.7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 2323T 804-743-9401 ;:
SEND/:ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL INC
TO: p O BOX ,170$ I i CUSTOMER; CHERRYVILLE NC .
ADVANCE,NC;j:27006
DATE OF REPORT 4/3/9'0 PAGE 1 SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY: EWD INC
SAMPLE
Lab.: ,
Solids
Nitrogen
Phos
Polar ;'
Srdlur:•
Calolum
Mag
Sodlupr°
.::;
,,'
, I(Qn:
Aluminumppe(
.. ,. 4
Manga
', ; .,•::'.
-
Zinc
Ammonia Nitrate
INDENT.
No.
%
46N
P horns
slum
etEK i
ebS
9If"C�-
nesium
'!¢ Na}
�prp'�e
ppm Al
nese :; ;
MA
-'
pppphn
?t.a;l;+-'
PPm Zn
Nilrogerl Nitrogen
% PPm
9LP
.:.i.
96 M
•Y
„
PPm
Cherry—
ville,NC
3/26
31541
0.84,:
8.33
1.83
0.23
1.86.
0.92
.'A.29
I
0.54
18900
21200
173
440
320
0.71 245
LAB
Cadmium
Chia
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Llsrcury
$elibrihim
Calcliim:
'1lolalile .
,i.• ..
Organic
Ivlol b-'
X r••
Ql `=i:a:°•
+: , .'
NO.
PP m Cd
mlum .
PP m Ni
PP m Pb
PP rn As;
m
QP... ��
'
QPm•r
,;
P.,.
Cprbo4al�
%:.,.
"Solids
3�,...�
Nitrogen
denifm
laa..
p:'
�• ; .
.TOC
$
PPm Cr
Eq.
,., , qb
%
Qprn`
31541
3.5
30'•'
15
45
5.65
0.53
1.70
6.6
NA
75.90
7.62
38
8000 .•
39.13
EP Toxicit
to fo
low".
* Argentom(tric.
All values except %Solids are on d dry weigh) basis. To convert %to mg/I IPPm) multiply by 10.000. This leparl appii as only to the samptelsf tarred. Samples
Out ieporls and ietlets are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients.and may not be reproduced in whole or in part• nor may any reference be made retained • inaximum of thirty days alter testing•
to the work, the results. or the company in any advertising, news release. or other public announcements wit obtaining o rt, prior writlen authorization. A Ell L n.inIC TURAL LAB TORIES IN,
C ey I722,L�1 -
Paul C_H_ Chu- Ph_D_ C_ NORMAN 30NESV -.—_

pE' i..-AUML 1
I
Z''C5' '`'A A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.
.; :.... ,
ACCOUNT NUMBER '
3505 Conestoga Drive • Fort Wayne, Indiana 46808-4413 Phone [phone]
R97-41A ADDITION
04/23/90
SEND
TO: k
A 3: L EEtst•ern Agri c L-abs 23-1•540 -3145 ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL, INC
P 0 BOX .170
7621 Wh i Cep i ne Road ADVANCE NC 27006
R i. c hrac lnd VA 232 7
QA _ 0040F_.CrS `_a0 040604 GROWER: CHERRYVILLE NC
j, 'CODE;
ODE
4 ' REPORT OF ANALYSIS
rilrIo ID141 ;
1. id:-i !_rt: 14 PESTICIDE Dat•04/19/90 F'a3e;
-ruj_1a Typrt ! l,1At.F•r .
{ E Amount" Dr. t•ec t• i con
L iridEll-1 pF'tl
End r i n ' FF'b 0.250
llethoxychhl�r :} FFb (.So
D i c arrtba r: f-3aiivei 1:► # pF b 1.0
X-+ 4-D . I F�pb 2.0
2 , 4 , S-Tp �' � 1 v�NFFk,
ppb
t
• - j
f
C`I� �1'le iiettre ti_1� ctt• or', a
We the 1 inii t•s' of the FreSent. met•hodctl D'gy
i;
! r
t

0
A Er L ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT NUMBER
7621 WHITE PINE ROAD • RICHMONO, VA 23237 • [phone] R97-alA
A Division of A Ft LAgricuftural Laboratories. Inc.
Addition
Prol.ce CNERRYVILLE NC
samofes ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL INC
Dam Rae'd:
Submitted P 0 BOX 170 OEMRaoorted: 4/5/90
8v.
Attention: ADVANCE NC 27006 oat. s.rttotaa
ts s. wa4zTvwA1-FR REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Tee
DATE
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
Cherryville,
NC
IR
Laboratory No.
31541
Alkalinity - Total
Alkalinity -Bicarbonate
Alkalinity -Carbonate
Aluminum
Arsenic
0.001
Barium
1
BOO (5 Days)
Boron
Cadmium
0.01
Calcium
Chlorides
Chromium (Total)
0
COD
Coliform
Conductivity (mmhos/cm)
Copper
Hardness (Total)
--
Iron
__..------
Lead:Co.1
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
< 0.001
-
Nitrogen (Total Kjeldahl)
Nitrogen (Ammonia)
Nitrate as N
Nitrite as N
Nitrate Er Nitrite as N
pH (Standard Units)
Phosphorus (Total)
Phosphorus(ortho)
Potassium
Selenium
Z0.001
Sodium
Sodium Adsorption Ratio SA
Sulfate as SO 4
Total Dissolved Solids
'
Zino
-Silver
0.1
Values are obta
ned by alsi nq
E P. Toxi city
roced r
RESULTS IN mg/1 UNLESS STATED
A & L AGRICULTURAL TORIE INC.
By:
mmerlLl:
rau I t,nu, I I.V.
ivais in accordance with orocedures outlined in Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater
t Edition) 1375 and EPA Manual of Methods for the Cherrucal Analysis of Water and Wastes. 1979

— c
lErli�16tl
of
IIftlf:I'f:
(I I-tjriIIr" IfL.:.-,
,
F-0111I' U. IFQ1ll}U
PLll10 (1: IPf1_IpiI1QI: IrajHaica
fll1l:
Id.� f�.e.0
_
FIG11: 13
fTf-S. 14 C6fP: Uni
V. fffL.ICfTIffll
FM
lbs FMIMIRC
MIE
11711E
nouns,
OFUA: O.T./A: FI711 f'
K Fb ai Co fli
121 I-:Vl0
130.0m
3.05 `
9,-1B 1 _ I8 W.81 43. i 0
1.72 0.118 0.97 1.51 • 0.0:61
O.l1Y►1 a. ..
lfgil S:
IfNll. I:fi,Ci11 9,2115 1.10 3T.81 =0.70 4.72 0_110 0.97 1.51 0.fl-M tl.tli►1
17I111MP.Ei Icit,ftl0 9,20G 1.10 31.Gl 43.A1 4.72 0.Iit] 0.97 1.51 0.03611 1
IEfill ER. Ct71: = l) :9CF, 2) 71} 90F. 3) M-7fF, 4) C3T-, R) Le1s than 1!2 irch r ainFal 1. 01 G :ester thai 1 r2 inch rainfal 1 in pgsl Z I Ii..r
IE (WilIIfll WE. = 1) EifSSIkW. CRe, 2) Ili', 3) MAST, 4) IJF�
repr a-aitative of GA, Im. ikrtibl xwLify this sits t,65 cfft t.a in «aplia-&�a uilli thy, c.:rdil.icn; of tht II..

'M W"-d aiL-J--GlIllCfA iA.n JO cArjl'I!FlLlCO &.1-1 RII!1-1 aciou'lldluo tit sen ellis !;lkIj NFI-150 f"P"I -3LII '(1113 Py
111:3 (1 Ell (1:- 'ISRAI (.E '.4M (Z '.IM XMIM -1
s-roxi I..Z ycd tit IIe:pA!v.i tp-ij z/1 m4n ((I 'lirjtj!e-j qxq ?/I —it r—I al '.m (1, 'Zkl'-zc (E 7
ZSIO'D Eau *0 Ir.7 Iq'I %1'0 Wz S972 1679 Wl fiEl"Sl lls'Wit" --A'A III 1111 I
.islu-o UM'D 197 19'1 %1'0 EB'Z U9 IG'Z'9 %'I [Wsl
1k: E(AWO ()I("*() WO 1111-l'0 tll'O LIZ* I Eoll 127 WE AI -I
I
940-0 �9'0 LVO UVO WI 119"21 WST [VO zy-.-"c WIE 1.0, It.)
lb' MAYO 9010,0 L� "0 19'0 OLf..I'O w-z I-c'-zz M'61 Z-51"0 WO, WE to A 1'.! 11
I.0 UJAY0 IZIO'O ES'tj I C'tj R-10-0 99'1 tz'sl IZ'IEI W'O (W.'e FAI'E ItWill
C4 1) VE'O ItWO &9'1 cz,!;l IZ'El IWO z Lu. EMWO KIWO E WE
ARI 31.1) P-13 U.1 I-rj 1.12 Iu A d I'llicl AY I :AVID !uj-ljG :lj I I I'l 11111
U3111137 j1.z1I31,Ujj sql al.w I-fil fullun
At IS.
k" :&U3 I IF Dial II U131A
.s:pl y-o6l'l of :Ij)I RIA-111) J 11 IIIAI *4 tit" :1 IIlIuI1
911WI11114 3.0.11­153

k ' At `
sN
SLUDGE IDNITORING REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT: Chorryville; NC`';`:;
PERHIT_i: N00000430
MET1100 OF fPPLICRTION:
Injection
011ER: John Some _%:/FIELD
7�
ACRES:
26
CROP: Sudex
SITE
FPPLICRTION
RRTE
Ibs fPPLIED/F1C
IERTIER
CONDI1lam
ME VOLUME :' SOLIDS
GRL/AC
D.T./FIC PM
P
K
Pb
2n Cu
Ni
Cd CODE
COOS
03/22/90 42.500 0.134
1,635
0.06 2.59
2.10
0.26
0.005
0.04 0.05
0.0017
0.0004 3A
2
TOTALS:
FUfiil 42,51D0 -
1.635
0.06 2.59
2.10
0.26
0.005
0.04 0.05
0.0017
0.00D4
Ct"LAFIVE 432.500
16,63S
3.31 2.59
271.10
40.96
0.405
3.73 3.85
0.2317
0.0524
MERRIER COOE = 1) >90F. 2) 70-90F. 9) 32-70F, 4) <32F, R) Less than 1/2 inch rainfall. B) 6reater than 1/2 inch rainfall in past 24 hors
SITE CONDITION CODE = 1) EMCESSIVELV DRY. 2) DRY, 3) HOIST. 4) NET
1, _, representative of END. Inc. hereby certify this silo was operated in compliance with the conditions of the Nondischarge Permit No. _ v v dOd l rb

SLWSE MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
PROJECTs•."
Cherryvi I le'.' MC ';`.'
PERMIT is MD0000430
METHOD OF W'PLICRT10Ns Injection
b&MR:
Jam Baas' r "
FIEIDs 5 L 6
RCRESs 29 CROP: Sudex
SITE
RPPLICRTION RATE
lbs RPPLIED/RC
WADER
CONDITION
DM
ME :.z 3±h'SOLIDS
GRL/RC O.T./RC PM
P K Pb Zn Cu
Ni
Cd
CODE
CODE
03/07/90
„ 156.000 i. 0.84
5,379 0.19 0.51
6.90 0.67 0.017 0.12 0.17
0.0057
0.0013
3R
2
OW00/90
169.000 ; ;! "; 0.84
5.828 0.20 9.22
7_47 0.94 0.018 0.13 0.10
0.0061
0.0014
3R
2
03/11/90
I10,500 "`:,`.. 0.84
9.810 0.13 6.03
4.00 0.61 0.012 0.09 0.12
0.0040
0.OD09
3R
2
03/22/90
32.500 0.64
1.121 0.04 1.77
1.44 0.18 0.004 0.03 0.03
0.0012
0.0003
311
2
TOTALS:
RM6R
468,000 .;
16,138 0.57 25.53
20.69 2.60 0.051 0.36 0.50
0.0170
O.OD40
CUMULATIVE
715.000 '
24.655 2.42 25.53
173.69 30.30 0.276 2.46 2.67
0.1510
0.0330
NERTIER CODE = 1) >90F, 2)'70-90F. 3) 32-70F. 4) <32F. R) Less than 1/2 inch rainfall. 8) Greater than 1/2 inch rainfall in past 24
hairs
SITE CONDITION CODE c 1) ENCESSIVELY DRY. 2) DRY. 3) MOIST. 4) MET
I.
r .
representative of EUD. Inc. hereby certify this sits was operated in coepliance with the eaditiwn of the Nosdisdmrga
Persit No.
dd7

rJ f
SUR)GE MONITORING REOIIIREIENTS
PROJECTS Char ills, 11C `'{`; a: ';'• .`. PERMIT is 1100000430 METIiOD OF f>PPLICRTIOH: Injection
DIMS John Bois G,l. FIELD: 2 KRESS !0 CROP: Corn
SITE
2:`'`T MIPLICRTION RRTE lba RPPLIED/RC IERTHER Com0111UN
ORTE vmu"E SOLIDS GRL/RC O.T./RC PA" P K Pb Zn Cu Ni Cd CODE CODE
03/13/90 130.000 0.04 13.000 0.46 20.57 16.67 2.09 0.041 0.29 0.40 0.0137 0.0032 3R 2
TMU:
RNAML 130,000 13,000 0.46 20.57 16.67 2.09 0.041 0.29 0.40 0.0137 Mom
ct"tNIVE 130.000 13,000 0.46 20.57 16.67 2.09 0.041 0.29 0.40 0.0197 0.0032
MMIIER CODE = 1) >90F. 2) 70-90F; 3) 32-70F. 4) <32F. R) Lass than 1/2 inch rainfall. W Greater than 1/2 inch rainfall in past 24 how*
SITE COMMON CODE = 1) EMESSIVELY MY, 2) MY. 3) MOIST. 4) IIET
1. A" , representative of BD. Inc. hereby certify this site was operated in compliance with the conditions of the W isd:ar9e Permit No. �UaG�¢3p

SLUDGE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PROJECTS OerryvlIle. NC PERMIT Is MOOD00430 METH0D OF APPLICATION: Injection
John Base FIELDS 3 FICRESs 12.7 CROPS Corn
2 = W°PLICATION RATE lbs APPLIED/AC
DATE VOLUTE SOLIDS GAL/AC D.T./AC I'm P K Pb
WEATHER
SITE
COM,FION
2n Cu HI
03/11/90 26.000 0.84 2,047 0_07 3.24 2.62 0.33 0.006 0.05 0.06 0.0022
Cd CODE
0.0005 3A
CODE
2
03/12/90 162.SOO 0.84 12,795 0.45 20.24 16.4D 2.06 0.040 0.29 0.39 0.0134
0.0031 3A
2
TOTALSs
WINUAL 188.500 14.843 0.52 23.40 19.03 2.39 0.047 0.93 0.46 0.0156
0.0036
Ct"JUATIVE 188.500 14.843 0.52 23.40 19.03 2.39 0.047 0.33 0.46 0.0156
0.0036
TESTIER CODE = 1) >90F. 2) 70-9W." 3) 32-70F. 4) <32F. A) Lass than 1/2 irx* rainfall. B) Greater than 1/2 Inch rainfall in past 24 haws
SITE CONO1T1O1 = 1) EXCESSIVELY DRY, 2) DRY, 3) MIST, 4) WET
1. ` - . representative of EMO, Inc. hereby certify this site um operated in compliance with the conditions of the Mondischarga
Permit No.
/� t,'
4 000 04W

W,1:-1;.1.,
SLUD6E MONITORING REQUIREHMS
PRCLJECTs Cherryvills. NC
OMERs PERMIT is MDOOOG430
PIET1100 OF APPLICATION:
Injection
FIELDs -4
FKWES: 20
CROPt Sudex
2 CHTION RATE
DATE VOLUME'SOLIDS GRURC O.T./RC PM
lbs APPLIED/AC
p K
WERMER
SITE
cam Ila"
03/14/90 11?.000 0.04 4.179 0.15 6.61
03/15/90 156.000 0.84 5.571 0.20
Pb
5.96 0.67 0.013
Zn Cu Ni
0.09 0.13 0.0041
Cd
0.0010
cam
aft
CODE
2
8.82
136,500 . 0.04 4.0?5 0.17 7.71
.7-14 0.90 0.018
6.25 0.79 6.015
0.12 0.17 0.0059
0.11
0.0014
an
203/16/90
03/22/90 26.000 % 0.04 929 0.03 1.47
1.19 0.15 0.003
0.15 0.0051
0.02 0.03 0.0010
0.0012
an
2
0.0002
an
2
TOTF"s
fM*L, 435,500 15,554 0.54 24.61
Ct"JLATIYE 1351.500 30,411 3.76 24.61
19. 94 2.51 o.G49
19.94 2.51
0.35 0.48 0.0163
O.OM
0.439
4.01 4.26 0.2463
0.0530
WEATHER CODE = 1) >90F. 2) 70-9w 9) 32-70F, 4) <32F. A) Less than 1/2 inch rainfall. 0) Greater than 1/2 inch
rainfall in 24 hours
SITE CONDITION CODE = 1) EHCESSIVhy My, 2) MY. 3) MIST, 4) MET
past
1.A-4 r"wesentative of EUD, Inc. hereby certify this site was operated in compilincr
with the conditions of the Hondischarge
Persit No.
00 do 4 to

-Ytt t _ .a ftaY kv i�e i
14
r
SLU0GE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PROJECTS CherryvIII e. NC PERMIT Is
MOO000430 METHOD OF RPPLICRTIONs Injection
OttERs John Bean FIELOs
9 RCRESs, 13.5 CROPS Corn
RPPLTCRTION RRTE
ORTE VOLUME .`• SOLIDS GAL/RC O.T./RC
lbs RPPLIEU/RC
PM P K
1ERTFER
SITE
C0 OI110H
03/01.490 156.000 '' 0.84 11,556 0.40
'.
Pb 2n Cu Ni
18.28 14.81 1.06 0.036 0.26 0.36 0.0121
Cd
0.0028
CODE
3R
COOS
2
03/02/90 45.500 0.84 3.370 0.12
5.33 4.92 0.54 O.OII 0.08 '. 0.10 0.0035
0.0008
3R
2
T0TTM5s
MAIM 201.500 14.926 0.52
23.62 19.14 „ 2.40 0.047 0.93 0.46 0.0157
0.0037
CUMIATIVE 201.500 14.926 0.52
29.62 19.14 2.40 0.047 0.33 0.46 0.0157
0.0037
1ERTIER CODE = 1) >90F. 2) 70-90F.-3) 32-70F, 4) <32F. R) Less than 1/2 inch rainfall, 11) Greater than 1/2 inch rainfall in pest 24 hours
SITE CONDITION CODE = 1) ENCESSIVELY DRY. 2) DRY, 3) MOIST,
4) MET
of END
r! .'representative .
1
Inc. her certify this sit* operated in.
eby y opx ce.plianoq with the conditions of the Nwidiscl►erge
Permit 110.
1
l�✓U �01y�4)C7
_
I .
1
i {

f�
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R
RT NUMEiER 1 `0� �k
a ��
�'� stir {
3;• 1,s 4: I
7621 Whilepine Road • Richmond Virginia 23234 • [phone]
R02f
•,t
; woo
�
- 96
AC CT 9 4!
SAMPLES
SEND SUBMITTED
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP GROWER: LEONHARDT BY: 6 N MACKIN
P 0 �30X'170
ADVANCE NC 27006
DATE OF REPORT 01125190 PAGE
SOIL 'AN4t YSI_S RFanR-r
I
O
ORGANIC • ,
MATTER
pHOBPHORUS .
POTA( IUAh`.
11nAGNESIUM
Gi►l�iuM
; somui� .`:.
'li
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
NUMBER
% "
PI P2
nRluk�Bny) N,HCoyP
R
MI
t
C�
_ i .
-,NE
OIL ! SUFFER
HYDRA..:.
GE R
Ekduiijir
RASE =ATURATION (COMPUTED)
tT
. .
NUMBER
RATE U../A
.... �...
par I RATE „Rr pATE
IIb k RAT E
' 1 II.MjBA1
%/afG'RATE
I�arMall T
�N ,: );.., r
H
utq/1001
C.E.C..
a'!9))
.- �.
;.
r IVy
}�
Cr
i H
�{
Na
11
01361-1
2.3 97ti
.'41 V 11
49 H
84 V
1 57 M
230 L
49 M
5.3
6.8
0.9_
3.0-
7.2
16.0
38.6
31.0
7.
12
0137
1. 9 109H
;�3G H
40 M
35 L
56 M
210 L
►:
46 L
' 5.0
1
6.8
1.3,
.3.1
.2.9.,15.2
34.3
41.0
6.
13
01371
am 1(111H
''45 V11
Y
50 H
46 L
95 V!
330 L
46 L
+
5.5
6.8
1.0
3.7
3.2'
21.2
44.2
26.0
5.
14
0137'
2.2 E5M20
M24
L
154 V1
144 VP
440 M
47 L
b.3
6.9
0.5
4.5
9.8
26.9
49.2
10.5
4.
15
0137
2.3 ; 87M
20 M
26 M
193 v
146 v
430'.'N
43 L�.
' 6.4
: 6.9
0.4
' 4.5k:
1511,.
27.3
4t3.3
9.0
4.
ICCC
Cvn1 Aa1AT1Aal
A.1 OA-1
.. .
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
211YC
MANGA
NESE
�R01�
l��DpO
`: agit�
t `
1
�TI��� �I2E ANALYSIS 1
ry
COPPER`
EXCE
■f
NlOpl� E'.
DEHUM '
fi
>i
%
SOIL
NUMBER
�a
S
? to
Mn
1.
1 �..
FE
'
Cu
.Y
S ` " '=
pATE
,,
+ ' '.
j�) f
Moi
q.'MOT M RATE
r1.3 RATE
Assn HATE
p.'E4 pATE
�N-h RATE '
R* Ca RATE
r►-4RATE.'
"
;w.bl1ca111AT
rragll#11 ,
"MAURATE
SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE
11
2. 2 L
1 d M
19 H
0.3 rA
12
1:0 VL
5 L
15 u
3.3 V)i
13
1.0 VL
9 L
16 H
0.9 M
t
'
�-
This rap Opp onlay to Ma aampla lq Ia1a0. Sampler w wN+naa
14
1 .5 ., L"
5 L
15
Q. $'.'
a max m o hi y aya tiler larllnp.
EA N AGRICULTURAL ORA RIES. INC.
15
1ei `6 L
8 L
15 F
0.7
C'. 0 J0
®Y- ..
• CODE TO
RATINr:. VERY
1 nw our % 1 nw
•1 .•cn.. .••
...• ..... �. ..�.
..�.... ....... .... ..
_.._ .._.._ ....

�:- -I I I.Emms�.
S HEPORT NUA413E
1� , • s
.,•,�y; .� rc3�y�4 .`9@°' r-jgN,a.�'�. iir �Kt �`�'�, . �'j 'r'�" Y a'� •t i 'rt {r:�i '1"'i Fl 2 f' F f t
to
L .'t Roz4-os6 'yt q `f L"EASTERN` AG R ICULTU 5990
'n 7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHRII RAL"LABORATORIES INC. Z 9
fi f
SEND Yr HENT r OND Vq, ? ) 8(14-743-94U
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP 1VP0BOX 170 ADVANCE NC 27006 CUSTOMER: L
EONHA
Y .-
(' DATE OF REPORT
1/26 f 90';,
If
: PAGE 1 .
SAMPLE
IDEIYT.
i •': .
_;;
:�IhOBe►I Phoe '` Pole
01369
12
01370
13
01317i
14
01372
15
01373
LA
•
i.
Cat*wum ryCt(xc .l ;mac, il,,t ;:;:'• rrr .:t.;,t; `,� r7};.
p".! Cd A i•bOtri I:f. ,�e,r,.;ar*Dl. F_n P :1'•ri•a
AV
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
01369
<0.5
�5
10
01370
0.5
5 ..
20
01371
0.5
�5
15
01372
<0,5
j5
20
013.73
0.5
�5
15
"" r�purts anuf levers are for the oubsivo
u. tru ,, ork, the results. or the companv
arxf confidential
in any advertising,
use of our rtients,
1
and ma v not he
news
lull.
release, or
reproduced In whole or in Pah nor may any reference be made g Priot written
other public announcements without obtaining our
authorization.
C. t'�ChuPh.DVJL
a
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY: C N MACKIN
AfNitrate
i
This re a �.
retain repor; only'; to the samlrlelsl tester) San'tjes arc
ed a marrinxrq! of thirty days alter Irsling
A tt L A BICULTURAL. ORATORIg, INC.

< � '.Ia SR"4 �tw"� "�� �`�i`Y" �,r�f•-+k 4 .: i" .,. / �.� it 1- i \i,r L .;
Y)T� A 81 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES; INC `
i s ,
ITT NUMEiER ` t �� T f t �,
r " Z- +.7621 Whitepine Road at Richmond Virginia 23234 • [phone]
4 086 9
r t�;
SAMPLES At
AC CT 8 5 2y
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP
`.ro: L E O NHA RDT SUBMITTED
GROWER: BY: 6 N MA C K I N
P 11 1?,CX .170
ADVANCE HC ..2760E
IATE OF REPORT 01125 I90 PAGE Z SOILL'ANALYSIS 'REPORT
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS 77. POTAS$�UNj AQAGNESIU .•� �-
MATTER M l:ALQIUI `S`: ;SODIUM . :FH'^t.'..:.. ,
HYDRO CstioR'•=Ff,}.•' PERCENT
SAMPLE LAB ; K ` ME Ctt N� : : 4EN ExMttllq r' R .:EASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
NUMBER % •• NYyi Bray) N.Nco3� #;, �' k ; }i. ; R �, • yy4 q,, i OIL 6F ER P N . 4
NUMBER _ ENR .... � .'i:•.• � t-, •�• •�• • r• � = , ,. , a Csp�ti '- � rj .:
.... !'.:. •: S ;. ;i f.i. "•I r, ti N . C.E.C.. "b' . } %: %
----_-.-- _ RATE Ibs./A NeFFRATE tjj,,,►HATE �IrFKRATE� ;p. OAT 6 :� %
FI GRATE NaN• RATE PH :: , ; . 1 . ',. alq/1001 1014/10QS 1. Cs N NA
16 1374 2.2 95P. 85..VH 95 UI 86 V 72 H 210 L 44 L 5.2 :6.8 1.1 3.1 7. ,. ;�. , 0 9.1 33.4 34.5 6.1
t
i
} i`.. V•I.•..
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK) _
MANGA. r, o- 1 ;
SAMPLE NITRATE SULFUR ZI(�C NESEbPPEN ' 4 KOLUBLE I MOLYE• . ' :7 ;; MR1rI EIZI ANALYSIS I
BORON,; ELI ' gALT$' i CHLOpI E' OENUM
NUMBER No S Z1� MN F� � , C4' I E LIME' 1.
1 RATE t . CI Mo' % % ! SOIL I
n� Nod N HATE N.•f RATE �1rle HATE F�Ye HATE 11� h RATE ptCr HATE' FIDE MTE NfCI lIA N'W 1111TE SAND SILT CLAY TEXTURE
16 ; 2. 2, L. 21 H 20 2.3 H
Thl• report applies only to lhe.�mPlelr) tested. SamPIQ u• nUla•a
1 • ' meMlmum o/ (hIr1Y p11y1 the
Ierllns.
A i L E N GRICULTIIRAL LASO RIES, INC.
- � d ,J
_ _ --- - -- RV A J 0 E

}
A
R024-086 ' c x; , �k £ '._, t :.
EASTERN:,,:
7621WHITEPINE RD. RICHMO AL; LABORATORIES INC.
.:.
SEND ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP ND VA. �7 W4-743-9401 9 \
TO: n
P 0 Box 170
ADVANCE NC 27006':. CUSTOMER: LEONHARDT
-Aff
DATE OF REPORT
{.
1/26/90. PAGE 2
SAMPLE "' ' SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
pflt. r .:
IDEIY%' � •-• Lab Nltro� 174-, gofer}"
No. t ► us' �j ,`ti� :N .f�tu Y .r' � .�r,i '•�;,� i�i:+'i;,,;:
f
16
01374
t`
j
= i
LAB CatiTtium t , �
NO. •• PPm Cd
, � � y :'ji::. �, •6'� �
!:,
01374 •5 5
10
1
1
reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential Use of our clients, and
wod, the resuhs. or the company in any advertrsin news release•
may not be
,
reproduced in
f 4
whole or 1n part, na may any reference
or other public announcements without obtaining our prior wrluen authorisation.
be made.
P}1.�{Chur,:
. 'Ph D
_ "• MU_T1PLy THE RESULTS IN ppni BV 2-TO CoNvpny
nR
SAMPLES '
SUBMITTED
BY: G N MACKIN
This 'report applies only l0 1
retained a maximum of Ihkly days teelesjy 0@d' Samples are
A &� ICULT B TORI
By INC.
ENO` -- -

EN6 ENVIRONMENTAL WA
P 0 BOX 170
ADVANCE.-N21006
I 218190 PAGEYOUR
'
Ai.rFLE I
UMBER
11 r
STE DISP
w ,,: 1000001111 1 "fie' ;,,, ■ �.e �� t_� 1111001041 . • ' Isi
N°AG RICULTURALkLAB®pATORIr
Road • Richmond Virginia 23237 •18041743 94001
!
GROWER: I.EON1iARDT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED,
BY:
SOIL FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Ibs./A
�.sk�$ii�v' s k ..ErrA ��lii k rXL'L� A �I. r !.; 1 ;'i rcv +r. 1. i F r
12 1.5
3 2.0 F
'7
1.0
5
.1.0
2.0
KS
is made. ations are based on research daj
Me is e andrpxperlence, but NO GUARANTEE or WARRANTY ex reu
Me m
P ed or Implled; concerning crop
(hu rerxlrls and fellers are for the exclusive and conlidenlial use of our cfienls, and may not hp /pn.n 1,. . r_
r Ill': Company in any adverUsrng, news releasp .,._ ..r6... ..�.�_
ACCT 45129
G N MACKIN
.. REcElm) rEQ 1 2 `
Cu B Mo �rrr„
IP?ER BORON MOI1l1 Nc•r, arc:
OENU11 oti nac.
_LU_ •i
A S L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL' Y
ROHATOgIESr INC.
i
9Y C. NORMAN JONES C�

-
•�.,�
af'.'s{S'i-.?i'�'-�a--.�.s cs+:-��,#.�i�M�n Yg •Y �` �'r`�N .�� � , r x,,..: ., ._ ,_ - 4 S ,. _
REPORT NUMBER
4r � A,41'EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 1 o2-uu67621 _ Whitepine Road •Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
C _
' � Y
AC(
SAMPLES
SEND ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP JOHN BEAM SUBMITTED
TO: GROWER: BY: GNM FOR CHERRYVILLE
P o he x 7 o RECEIVED tip& 1 91990
ADVANCE NC' 27006 r
)ATE OF REPORT U%i I c t- i UPAGE
REPORT
•R
ORGANIC.
":
'`;i,"� OsillibRilS r���f'
c
N
,p�
Z
' - F
w.
L►N
MATTE)i
SIt
' �
0111Y1': NNO`
,flay
Er,=AMPLENUMBER
(vol
RATIDNlcowITED)
t
NUMBER
ENN .
:�, }��Ait'
Y.
s
t`
•t
i' H
E,
y�I•�j
Ndr
K
r'
�.
X
Na
RATE 16./A
INS .rfNATi .
�` M....
:M++IIN n.
li1Ey/110�
lhV�
7
12079
1.9 89M
i 46 VH
53 H
61 M
28 VL
170 VL
;` 40 L
4.8
6.7
2.1
3.5
4.5
6A:
24.2
59.8
4.9
j
1
,
s' (SEE EXPLANATION ON UACKI t 1
.
s
t . 5
f� ,�{
'� 7
* 'F'
tt
�
' I
p�:� • '��
�l� its
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
IINf Wj
(t
NE$E I
t
I� �b
<�
PENUM
%
NUMBER
Noy
S
+ i` X . ZN t
' AIIN j
�a Fl
{
fr�t.
,.
%
%
:. SOIL
w■NOTNNATE
gNNI1ATE
f- OWNIIATf
'Tj1.14RATI
a%41111#/
� ti.
1lawBATt
SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTUREII
7
1 `. 9 L
12 M
27 H
0.7 M
This report aPPllaf only to the tamplatt) t••tsa.'Samplas ua latalnw
s;
u r but r (y
a maximum of thirty days attar tatting.
aa�1'. 7.
.. ..
-i'�(.l,q.
7f, .'•;
_.
i JSI t V ,t ''�^. (Sst sA
A i L E?A�ERN � RICULTURAL ATO IE INC.
� U
C. NORMAN JON
BY

`>4j,",- -;z—
WANDE1111*4
p
W-4
p�
-4 Af1"V14'EAST'E­RN 'AGRICULTURAL'2 LABORATORIES INC
sy 7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237.804-743-9401
To
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE` INC
P 0 BOX 170,. CUSTOMER: JOHN BEAM RE U
ADVANCE, NC
--,'.;27006
R
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
DATE OF REPORT 4/1-7/90
PAGE 1
SOIL ANALYSIS
REPORT
BY:
GNM FOR CHERRYVILLE
SAMPLE
IDENT.
Lab
No.
Nitrogen
%N
Phi
phorus
Poles-
slum
11
m
Sulfur
%S.
Calcium
% Ca
Mag-
nos ium
Sodium
Iron
Alurninurr
inga-
C
Nitrate
-%P,
%K
%Na
pprq Fe,
ppm At
nese
ppm Cv,
Ztt
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
7
12079
LAB
NO.
Cadmium
ppm Cd
Chro-
mium
Nickel
Pprn N1
Lead
ppm Pb
Arsenic
A
M61vur y
ppr� Ng
Selenturp
*T
!r o
or: Vi
fj:
"�khaN
q!
ppm Cr
ppm
%
g&,
12079
0.05
0
-.1.5
Values are
obtain2d,by
Whlich
xtraction
prozedures.
Values on this let
A are the
tal amouni
tit the santle.
Our repoils and letters are for the exckjslii�e and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or In part, not may any reference be made This report ap 1 `60 lott -a
to lire work• the results, cc the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining Our Prior written authorization. hil iiwnWelsf tested. Samples tire
j retained amax1r;:'mo thirty days after testing.
Paul CAP -Chu, Ph.D. A ft L AGRICULTURAL, LABORATORIES. INC.
By
—C—.NORMA"ONES

• ' r
REPORT NUMBER AA L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC. F
Y.t
it U 37621 - u7621 Whitepine Road . Richmond Virginia 23237 • 1804) 743-9401
SAMPLES ACC T d 4 5114
SEND
TO: VV I .101 If pJ TAl• IJ.1;tT f* [, (,j SUBMITTED
' GROWER: J OHN 'If~ AM
BY. GNM
RECEIVED APR 2 1990
DATE OF REPORT P.+ PAGE ' 'r'r f t a t }
SOIL NALYSIS REPORTe ,
ORGANIC` �.,`.'3PN03PHORU! '. W) 0 t b!`• C� afi _{ ;� �' r �' PERCENT
LA
SAMPLE % MATTER , , 1 PP , K ? 4 Fr y GI ,+ IHYOR9 Ex iATORATIQN (COMPUTED)
NUMBER 1�..d k day) . ir�llca� �+ '�.; , r, , xµ�ru> + t�►l,_Y f w
Eil^t ! . ! �+ ;�•�i i�. p.��1,�ff��a �� r# i �,..' -•711. y r �. C 1 `�%+, } x•+ .1
NUMBER RATS lip./A '. i .1a�ft jrEiiATt + elils, to- N!+f I��i f� �O 1 1j' w; 4 r, N,
Oili
1. T +'it'
v V1
165 v
I 56 P
?5; V1
130 VL.
41 L
,4.8
6.8
1:a
3.0
4.6
7.0
21.8
60.4
6.1
1;i5 v
•iI v11
61 t,
46, M
700 L
47 L
5.0
b.4
1.
2.9
5.4
13.1
54. S
41.0
'+
,�
•• ��' "I;
:= 1 1 . ,`
€ I +
�i II
lei !1
2110 L
•61 Al
'5.3
6.8
1.1
:3.7
6.4'
17.3
S3...
31.0
I.;
a1r
.`'•14 1.
I:
1_
4+: L
105 v1
300- L
46 L
5.7
6.9
n.7
3.4
3.6
25.6
43.9
21.0
5.9
,�F
1 8
1 191 :VI
56Q M
4t5 .;L
T.p
0.0
S.U.
8A
31.1
5.5,c�
t7. S
4.1
(SEE
EXPLANATION
ON BACK) _ { +
u. ra,ln.a

r iyr■ ww■ ■■ ■ 16.5 ■ovem ■ea.+• ■aaV■ 511Fa Vawa wtr7• mom"" WIv
i :• � a 27
SEND
T0: ENVIRONMENTAL'.WASTE DISPOSAL
rt JOHN BEAM
P 0 BOX .170 �,A': '-
ADVANCE, _NC..27006
DATE OF REPORT 03/29/90� PAGE 1
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
GNM
AnN
• ' � 'i • i::
P«
SAM,Gplti
�_ : •., • . y4`�i.
s r {� �
:IQEIYVc�j
'
2
7950
3
7951
4
7952
5
7953
i
`
6
7954
f
10
7950
�.5
5
7951
<0.5
5
,,
10
7952
0.5
10
10
7953
0.5
5
10
7954
/0.5
f
S
10
`
s
1
i
*
S
rR t �•
--
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be re rode ed in w or in
p par nor y any reference be made
to the wak, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release• or other public announcemen s wilfaut o talning r pr' ri .n autho I ation.
l
This report appYe} only to the sarrtplelsl tested. S des are
retainedft*nv4tnrty days after lastingA
EtPAUL
C.H. CHU, PH.D.
By amNIT
N--

unvvvtn: w•,111• ,.,Lnn BY: IiNM
RECEIVED APR - 2 1990
It! VICr: *4C,. 2711Q6
DATE OF REPORT PAGE
� 5t
A
NALYSIS REPORT:''
SOI L
ORGANIC, 'j.`� ►HdEMNORUt ' ` ddl `
MATTER `
LAN I'
tA1plE R % '• (weik�il N�IFo#ta
NUMBER
. '
u i
NUMBERENII r;
RATE .. WA 10 ii • �i xAte ' i�+ AAt z': +ft jlti�l/ Mtli �' �` �# 1 ` c
y 071.0 ?'i" '1 M 21.1 f1 90 It 125 v t 430 M 64 M 6.0
f
f
v .
(SEE EXPLANATION ON RAPKI
F
O
t
-`•F»�ttd
'�li .•
.. .PERCENT
EpQ7
EK�bibjlt
NATION (COW E01 "i
U)
t
b.
7M!�11l101
SNIP `
'
,
a C! _ .
;! -
t. Na
:• 6.9
0.7
4.4
5.3
23.9
49.4
15.'0
. 6.4
'
r
�
b �'
t
S

0
r --• r w z szr r}
SEND
TO: `ENVIRONMENT),
O BOX,,.170'
ADVANCE, NC'.
i;
DATE OF REPORT 03/29/90
W.
W.
t
Pkv
SAM
`2 A
� ,: _` tt�t=� = ttrrrrrrttt>• .y;}. �� ^$ tt>_ : tam j - r_ ,. ...� o
m, f 1V ri1`•t �` 15v�h""?�.�x ji'P'��."i,'4 i �t C.d �'�.7',S�,x,�S COY �'�e.f��'�1
L} ' m •�5t s' ,N t �r ,r._ t n t !% y,M^ xS xs�N � i t �
il.EAS..��Y�
TERN AGRICULTURAL; LABORATORIES INC.
1 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 804-743-9401
E DISPOSAL CUSTOMER: JOHN BEAM
7006
PAGE 2 _'SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
• ,r _ T
7955 C0.5 5 10
u
1
i t t
L
Our reports and letters are lot the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduce w of in part, nor aye y relerence be made This repWl >iPp4e only'to'Ihe ;alnplelsl tested. Samples are
to the wak, the results, or the coffWany in any advertisino, news release, or other public announcements with ut Haininp our pri rift n aut ruation. retained a mexintum of thirty days alter testing I
PAUL C.H. CHU, PH.D. By

CN
i

L EASTERNAGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
6-92A 7621 WHrrEPINE. ROAD, RICHMOND, ' VAS 23237 (404) 743-J40�
:. f
ENVIRONMENTAL'WASTE DISPOSAL INC. A
SEND q SAMPLES`k U 11CRTO: P BOX:: ! �� CUSTOMER: SUBMITTED
ADVANCE, fdC 27006 . BY:
' DENNIS FIELDS
�CHERRYVILLE
R
DATE of REPORTPAGE SLUDGE, ANALYSIS REPORT
A/AIn7:' ,
vi11e
01439
2:43
5.97
1.98
0.20
1.59
0.77
,0.:31
,,.•: G
� t•.r�
t fb x'F�
��'.: M'I..y
`�C.,
.,,•T t 1. '..:Hj ,
+,'1.w
r, .�
1.04 490 330'.. 0.91 560
01439 3.0• 25 15 40 r 7.3 1900'r '
r �
a u - C . H . Chu P h . D . This report applW only 6 Ui: iainnpl.(o) aetad, Be" are
retained a ma)dmum of "ity darn tlPar Mona.
All vakos :arcaept % Solids are an a dry welaht basis. To convert A to mgA (ppm) multiply by 10.000. AGRICULTURAL RATOR1 WC.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and conflderdlal use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, por may any reference be - .
made b the worts, the results, or Ow company In arty advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorlmtlor.

AGRICULTURAL
UTILIZATION -
LAND APPLICATION
EPA
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
LEACHING PROCEDURE.
(TCLP LISTING)
Parameter
Cherrvville
RCRA
Limit
Arsenic
<
0.012
5.0
mg/1
::Barium
1.473
100.0
mg/1
Cadmium
<
0.001
1.0
mg/1
Chromium
<
0.003
.5.0
mg/l
Lead
<
0.007
5.0
mg/1
Mercury
0.0015
0.2
mg/1
Selenium
<
0.007
1.0
mg/l
::...:.. .....: Silver
<
0.001
5.0
mg/l
Endrin
<
0.002
0.02
mg/1
..Lindane
<
0.04
0.4
mg/l
Methoxychlor
<
1.0
10.0
mg/i
= Toxaphene
<
0.05
0.5
mg/1
2,4 -'D
(
1.0
10.0
mg/l
:2,4,5 - TP Silvex
<
0.10
.1.0
mg/1
Benzene
<
0.05
0.5
mg/l
Carbon tetrachloride
<
0.05
0.5
mg/1
-Chlordane .,.__
<
0.003
0:03
601
:.Chlorobenzene..'.; _... :. -
<
10.0
100:0
mg/1
Chloroform -
<
0.6
6.0
mg/l
Cresol -(Total)
- <
20.0
200.0
mg/1
o-Cresol
<
20.0
200.0
mg/l
p-Cresol
<
20.0
200.0
mg/1
m-Cresol
<
20.0
200.0-mg/l
1,4-.Dichlorobenzene
<
0.75
7.5
mg/l
1,2-:Dichloroethane
<
0.05
0.5.
mg/l
ill -.Dichloroethylene
<
0.07
0..7
mg/1
2,4--Dinitrotoluene
<
0.013
0.13
mg/l
Heptachlor
<
0.0008
0.008
mg/1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
<
0.05
0.5
mg/1
•--Hexachlorobenzene
<
0.013
0.13
mg/l
Hexachloroethane
<
0.03
:_ 3.0
mg/1.
4. :Methyl ethyl ketone
<.20.0
_ 200.0
mg/1 :.
' Nitrobenzene.20
Pentachlorophenol..''
<
10.0
100.0
m4/1
=:Pyridine .. -
<
0.50
-5.0
mg/l
Tetrachloroethylene
<
0.05
-_.0.7
mg/1
Trichloroethylene
<
0.05
0.5
mg/l
-2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<
40.0
400.0
mg/l
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<
0.20.
2.0
mg/1
Vinyl chloride,
<
0.02
_ __-_..._._.. --0.2
mg/1---

(IaLLOaLLS(I ION
90 O>
910 9.UaTpIe-4nq-E'T-0I0T40Rx8H
-ETO O>-
ET'0
euazu9qoz0TT40Ex9H'
8000'0---
900* (apTxozpAH)
IOTqDeqd9H
ZOO'O>
zo*O
OETO .0
0, -. :. - - --.
Ell � ",:,. - -
;auanT 040.704TUTq -{, Z,�
L 0 0>,-�
1. 0
9u;9T q 90Z0TqD-ECI-;-T
A
so!, 0}3 s
GL
a aqqo 70Tq0E(-Di..
0
olOT,
ZT
, v
0 oz:>
o.* ooz':7,,
TOS9.10. a
0 OZ.>
0100z"
Wsaao-d'.,
0 OZ;,-
olooz
Wsa'O-ul-
0 M-
O*Ooz
TOSG.70-0-
uin-Emo-Tqo.,.
9 * O>
0*9
U120-40-TOTqD -
O*OT-
0,00T
9uazuaqoa0Tq0
EOO * 0--
Eol
9URP.IOTqD
9 0 7 O>
9*0
9PTaOTqDR149,L uoqxi2o
TOO*O-
0*1
mnTmppo
090*0-
9*0
quazuqa
ELt,*T
O*OOT
mnTaleg
-I/75m- ZTO-O>
0•9....._........
_,oTuasav-
Ba) allAa'I
s LLrm s a a ril 1
LLNariLLI.LSNOD
Z-
SLIrMSqH-'IaAHrl.
AHOLLVFM0Hd-SLLNafILI.LSNOD OI.LSIUaLLDVHVHD
ILLIDIXOLL
0
uoo]5ieri :8-rdori'S- -40 83.3MOS-
9.5pnTS :8TdvmS jo adXj
:.KqunoD
'Ome4s N (1�1
t,9EZ oN qoa roxa qp-j
90OLZ
'ErVU VMaS3K
TVLLC�';' * 'ON IR213
ORL- ZXR3 EMU a3K3K
90c-
Qz
z /6T
-0 G
PATS J8u-I0H 'N CZZI';'
'-:ssaippV qry
:Aq paTjTqza3
.071 :4sAT1eUV
uoof5-erj` :ma:tsAS Zo ad4j:':
T6-E-9 paAraaaa'attea
sPT a T a: 2-19 Pa-43aTT03'Z--
T6-0E-t, :P8438TTOD 84ET,.'
9TTT-AX.XI8qC) :.!tuTOd OTdmeS:'.z
ON 9C)U'eAPV OLt.-­xoa101d - - :ssazppy.'-
oui cLqa 4u8TT3.-I0 m94s-XS'­`::
SISIqTKv ao laodaH
Z007CL9/616
9LEZZ DN 'Pug 4saM
oz Xos I. 4,H
:03133o 3)azodjo:)
_.-MZ I_S&Mpojff 2U'jn,[Wf) fo_UOI$Mla V.
szmoj;vmog .-'7VLMZNMOUIANZ:-VNEI#10'H'V%I.
VT
Chi

REPORT
CAROLINA..ENv1RONMENTAL .LABORATORIES
A Division -of Graham Brothem,ZhI m
Corporate Office:
Rt. 1, Box 20
West End, NC 27376
9191673-0487
OF ANALYSIS
Lab Address:
Sanford,: -NC Z7330 a ;
. NCNCD LAB. �CERT. •4'N0'.'-'306
NCSDNA LAB. CERT. NO. 37741
System or Client Name: EWD Inc.
Address: P.O.Box 170 Advance NC '•.
Sample Point:"Cherryville Lab Project No.: 2364
Date Collected: _4-30---91 System ID No.:
Collected By:, "­.77Fields Conunty:'"..
Date Received: '5-3-91 '' Type of Sample:' '"Sludge
Type of'System:Lagoon Source of Sample: LAgoon
Analyst: LJ _.
Certified by:. i�� .__ ....... ....
. `PARAMETERSF _ '• .= . - '. .
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
CONSTITUENTS -REGULATORY LEVEL -RESULTS
CONSTITUENT
REGULATORY LEVEL(mg/L)
RESULTS
Hexachloroethane
3.0
-<,0.03 m L
Lead •=
5.0
<0.007
Lindane "" .
0.4
<0.04
Mercury -
-0.2
0.0015
Methoxychlor
10.0
�1.0
Methyl ethyl • Ketone
'1'200. 0
<20. 0
Nitrobenzene
.:2.0
-<0.2
Pentachlorophenol
::100.0
-10.0
Pyridine
.--5.0
!<0', 5
Selenium
1.0
<0.007.
.,Silver ,;; ,
�Sil
'..
5 0
<0 .;00 1
. Tetrachloroethylene
0 7
<0.05
Toxaphene
0 5
<0.05
TrichloroetYiylene r0 5
<0:`05
r2Trichlorophenol
:`400 0
<40:0
2,4;6-Trichlorophenol
:2.0
:'20
2;4,.5-TP=•(Silvex) _.y
�1.0
<p.10
Vinyl:Chloride
_.. _..:. _
'0.2
_
`<0:02
* _.NOT DETECTED _ . :....
• _.
}

lu—d &-mf� aLF1 jo sw?,4?Pm aLR yR?n a-=l[ldm 3 u? Pa4R-'Kb ssn e}?s snp fH? figs-1°4 •-uI
'US
jo aA? CkU
'I
13M (b
'JOCW (E 'AM (Z 'AM k-WdSMG (t = 3DD7 NOMMOO 31IS
....9JI04 W Vmd u? TTR&AV +
4•0u? ZIT uAn -w4gme (8 'TIQumej LPU? UT uma g5al al
':m (b (E •`zwym 2
'm6c (I = 3 M 2 -mm
693)ro
61FTTro.
b611P bBZ
9bE•0
E8•E
ISMtB
=`:OOS'as
31luTwo
ZTTOro
09m'0
SBI EZ'T
61,T'O 06TZ E8'Fl
A8•T
LTr'BT
000'ipb -Ifm
Z
tE .
ozo0ro
66M O
ZEro ZZro
%"'0 ZE•T b0•ET BD•Et
EEro
06Z'E
16J9eJBD
Z
t£
eDDoro
OrTOro
9bro TE'0
AE3D'0 &'T 8b•8t 9r•BT
Arlo
WBOO
Eb2 =r `'': '.±:
OOsbTT - T6/GZOOM
Z
tE
9TOO o
ZBDD'O
ll•0 8T'0
ZZO.O OT't AB'OT 98ro1
AZro
BOZ`Z
EbZ
OOD�59 t6/lrZ/EO
Z
LE
E6ODro
PT2010
Uz'0 Abro
ASO.O s8•Z ,. . 9Z'BZ EZ'Bz
TL'0
Zb06L
EbZ. c.': '' .000'69T
16ITZJKI
Z
us
9m"O
5=10
BO'O GOV
"'0 EEro 9Z'E 9Z'E
BDro
ET8
EbZ ''7::::::•
mS'6T 161OZJE0
3D07
3M3
PJ
?N
ryi to
9d A d NM
ai/•lro airm
31M
234ItH 1
Oti/QjIldrf! 99I
31M f DIIWI'i"
W a8 u Or *nlk
WOO =dDW
bZ ISMIN TT
.
gMIA
=
4as7 OAM r1D
u0110e1LI
quIlwl-dd! -0 MU34 OEMXD"
=1t
1I4rW
'r.'•3H '011ufuLmD :133fOdd
SLN34MiTrKM 8wII2 IDM 37( M

91DGE MOVI7ORII+6 FS1III�J'BYFS '
FRWEITs . - Chwr ville, ^,; ``' FIMIT is _ 1-101111130-M
' NEM OF FFR-IaifIM
Injwtian
Otil� 5two Leoriv i FIELD: 13
RL1F5. 14
amP- Care ;
7!RCMJE
OPF7*iFOtb .TdTI 87d
RMLIpifIM RRiE
16a FMIEMC
�1FEBRJW .. D.T./Fl; ' .' : PHV :::
P K Pb
2h W Ni
0242/91 IA13DD � ;' .2.43 ' ' 9 286 0.94 ' : 37.22 '
37.26 :: -: 3.7K 0.075 .
0.62 :. 0.92 0.0282 .; ' 0.0096 39 2
r.
OW13/'91 ,19,�0 y :2.43 113M 0.14 , 5.�
�.
5.99.,. 0.56 0.011
0.09 0.14 0.0Dg2 0.00M 3q 2
'
TDIFiS.
R�14f1_ i 149,500 r 10,679 1.08 Y ' 42.81
42.65 4.33 0.087
0.71 ' 1.06 0.0325 .; < 0.0055
.. ..:
aft"TrAE ; 279,�0 19,964 .2.26 ':'.,.
:: •. 0.2�
1.68 . 257 0.0Q9'::. .. 0.0159 .
18iM 031E - 1) >4F,` 2) 70�90F, 3) 32-7(F, 4) <32F, R) Low than 1/2 imh rainfall, 8) 6-aetw than 1/2 inch
rainfall in past 24 hau z
SITE cmom0T� aN, 2), MY, 3) FOLSI, 4) LEf
rep-am*,atiw of F3,D, Irr- ha -day oartifl,F this site um operated in aoapliarna with the ardition-, of tb'tbndi�ga Posit Na,
_t
.. _
.-k '
r!

1
•
l -
..
1
WfTPCU�%7'CN
3iO-dFW!Pu'fl
OR P a+03-4?Pn0 MR 4Tin eouQildmo ut pew.mdo sQn egtc cnp fH33-00 +ap4 --xI 'Q9
jo a^?Adj •
1
..J
� F
I3I (b 'ISIM (6 'AM (Z 'AM A (T — 3LID NOIlIQNO 3IS
n4 bZ ut 110JUPU 43UTZ/T LWR -ow" (e 'iIQim-A Lpm ZJT URLD —W7 (H
'-eD (b '"-m (E ,lzwx-m.(z•'3)6C (T = 3I>3?HI1BQ
EOTo'0 - bT�•0
89'1 "i ET'T
M*O
MIT
006'91 0001B9i 3AIIHTiCT
E0IO'0 bI50'0
89'T _ el "I
lET•0 9B•9 18 29
SZ•L9 ; TZ'T
006'9I
t14,OUD469T
f,Yi
Z
IiE
obOD'0 .. e6To-o :
S9•o E•0
E50'0 E97Z eo'9e <:
'.
9o'9Z 99'0
. o0Ss9 [b2 Tasrzo
z
HB
GPOoro IWO
iL•0 9►•0
950'0 06z 69 9L ''
99'8Z u'0
(rmT'Z mz ems TA : _ T61Evm
z
WE
MOM 6m G
ZB'0 zzro
9Z0.0 ZE'T ": Wel -
BUTT EEro
t_
., 06z'E �z „ ;;. ' OOS'ZE T6 rM
3DJ
3ID
PO TN - :
ro �
4d - d ... ". '
Nyd ai/'1•o �iIFA SQT-O5 ;< 3 n
2Hi1l�IIlddi
s9T
31L£I tDIIkAI'Idc#! Y.
r
LLaO :dm
oT
bT
�9I� : 4 r �P�Fm1 5 ' 5d?O
uot�xfuI
�DIIlL7Ild�d OW13J
s OE0000 M
.
llld'Dd ` ,al 'eTl!� Tl =1'l Jd
r
SLN3a rtM 9TQ?ALINOW 390T6
a

91AGE hWIICRIM REIl1IREA M
PROJEI:T: CharyvillQ. NC ,g PBahIT WM000430
M "IFSD OF FPPLIOf1fI0N:
Irdcctiai
OWE Stow Lroartnrdb FIELD. 15
12
CFM': oarn
,
al3ff : Jain Baer :.
! ' fl'PL.IMON MWE
16a FFFUEnIC
IEAiFB2
CfilE :VOIJJ£ ;�I05 .. GALM aT.M .... FM
' p - K Pb
a,Ou Ni .
Cd
0aOE
(x3119m 32,500 ' 2.43 :.: 2,70E - M27 10.06
10.A7 1.10 0.0?2
0.18 0.27 : Q0082 .
0.0016
3A 2
O8/dY91 156,ODJ ".2.43 13,0) 1.32 ? 52.11
;;'
52.17 5.27 0.105
0.8? 1.29 a0395 .:
WIF9
3R 2
ol
TQiRS:
RHM I'08-A 0 ,� 15,70B 1.59 62.97
63.09`.. .. M7 0.127
1.05 1.56..
CiMLAfItiE 188,500 15,709 I.99
0.127
1.05 1.56 (Lo428
0.0096
19MM WE 2) 7090`, 3) 32-70F, 4) <3 , R) Low than 12 inch
rainfall, B) d a*m then 12 irrh rainfall in past 24 Fors
SITE CCNDMQN COIE = 1) EN£i MLY CRY, 2) CRY, 3) MOIST, 4) Wff
rgrvmr►tatiw of B40, Inc. ha�hy certify this aito was cparatad in oaoplianod with the ooTditiare oF'the Nmdiad�ga
Plorwit No.,

AA rn 7Q 0
'it
Mb
mjj-1* :-,t
4xr,20 '.0 M
m
­._IjkZi.,- 4ill y`
cr. ;--p. -wnuft,
:N
ai­_,ql� �A
a
V '63
A "'i,
S
J Q
'M
f-V
;<
ZZ
LiA
w i uio .IV
WAIN
m dw
rn,
CD
ce ttG-s J.u13, w=
m
law CD
W.:A 54�
I MW
in
IZ. CA M33
p WI:
0 r
V,
CO
30
Qe(y tv, r.2i io aslob eo,v y 16rJ, Qf
c ibv_
wa
r4 -CA3'30
W.
m
FA
PILWEV
w cb w
C�
C >
Cu.,; aw. eb
.02
a 7=�
046
49 dw 'Jig
Wo
Aw.

T NUMBER
R1 19-ill SC
ENV
SEND, P;:. 0
I
M
k6k LEASTERN MaRICULTURALLABOFIATORIES,'
,­7621 Whitepine Road 9 Richmond W'ginia 23237.0 (804).743-8401
lN
R
W A ST E D I SP
AC CT:,
4 40HN BEAR -
SAMPLES'
SUBMITTED
0.6'.11
'GROWER Y.
.0
CHERRUILLU-PROJ
bUIL-AINALYbib
K1tFUK I
Jill,
0 pit,
�•a
F!!f
...�,
y,
�`1'SJsi a �
- � ,4:'.
'.��` 1'P4nt�r
09971.
IN
v-
!.,-2 12
K.
ty.
RMW
p
Al�
'MEHL IC
X-M
EXTRA
TION
X
F
i4
"51
Lill
-0
0997
'05.'�
0 0
11! 5`
69972
0
C 05
Qfl
A 5,
sk.
4g
%
t
J
il
Valul anith
L .18
rt
o9 .
tp.,or
thetotsimount
of
Ihe samplb.­­
Ow repams C flidnflail. " of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In pert} n*
"are*sre for exclusive a - nd on- use .. or may any reference be made
This
oil
to the the company In any advertlaInglinewle roloaal or other public announcements withoutobtainingour prior written authorization i
retained
retain k
a nJ
ME
as n
j AA L N' GRICULTURAL
RAL
TORTES INC.

:y:+ ,� ., e.i{ •tr.lir. :l+w :iaY �' �� iJ.. GJ,I
�V r. _•;g:Un;+':,1 J:_._ .,: '...'iih •salts
ii:a I - + ..:1 •: :i::.if JUtC -'.ifi dA
.. it LYLI t't -N•U •.T
r
� M tea.: �
_
w
A i
(Oi- •?)O[F A:GR•N� NI. tLLQ/f Li.%N '-.
zS[ �. 8i•JJ• 14..E -•, -., E ltiSii%OCi ijY55i
-. is6llt: Ai •Oil war.-
-it
m-;v 6iJ. ib v .✓u Nic
+QE
-
' 1'J
o --
Ci..,.
.
.,y¢: .a_ ->'+�3
1lrfun,dinv>iie �s
y � .•A•
�
tn� t :o.( rtDy:
;.a: +iiea,Ji"-i[n 2..',,r<•
r 1iiF'
,r..'y�. '. 472 d
'4(riP_tVG1. iA517M16Q
1 !Y' �l
fig'
'ritosoaiinl,in ry siir
•�, numr'.
}ow-• 31.•6{. riacr-�•e•
YYL O.. y
W4,gw
Oi31Y1 ti'sft �C:.;iS�'_-
o•
.
`f+!•f 2 s
, J,. .as a
�^��-. r r JeZ3
l,iivai•i.w.aI[
_+�1�✓;-
O ^
t b•ia l 3 i
riff 8Q6Y-
O J ii
1 L:
�r.1
O
-
ZiWita'=tl(10ni
+:!:-••:
�I
�
,.6•
.[, �a 3V, ' r.4�lL _ram --..ram
' �•
'ii
'} Y` JS .N,! ? Y• It err.,
lob
yv;1. •J4. ca:....i ...
5
6fif t u(b J�
ei
.�
..1
Aa
Z
Gi
zsgd�'+ftr9il9Pf7 } -
In-
P
.L�
ikill
Aba e '
c; -eT
8+•►J a `O
•
r
4 a
ttl,U
11:0.w4 ,Yli1:j<iXkp41�;'-�. � yp,.� •. �
13�� ",� ua(i�7•C`JJOJ(�' .}• �1
L
J �iS• fO,�FrM iGOd W - p!-
k Jii4 :,t. • �.�;,�.�.
:J[O
fii W'B:rii1.E
M
ri
O N
'..
Z
m
9
OZ
O
m
' F � •t`Fc � �'�7Y. �O IJ 5w t1•i"^'J1?
-.
7q
(`Ai� CiS(A ^•y)}_g- Tom`^ R.eUti 4l i:% Vvgbi
N•�LASF ` �s Ki; s„it:cil- FnV(Stijui
��+,t( ii.s
. Y`�', i:t�_� 4`S':'WFS•N 4/S:i4 M- ,Y2+:.:.:J7y:
ia.',•L( -
..'n` YAn� � 'li? � fi. ja 'k' "NJF:M
•ii p'1 .'4{
.a.u,:
t%J� ';C,n aiue y..iC.at'-L2Ctx/J31LM -.f{Yb•a+t'Ol
... -..
;',ey�..1.n44 ��,�A{cra in IJ.'!L-M �+•;!w•*a„
-..
•�'� >! 3lJ' OFF .t � � - lJ �' r
- �C �'] � 17 t1++ti � .1K'gd +ii 1 uGfAulfl`e(igyl�Jt7J -
:,�-:tea-
a oY sjj�
Im aj '
m
•
CD
:TtG: rrti, ._.- )4s?fi,' ,�; ;: t0 •-i+w :7".[i
.-
'O
Ilya ,Niti..v•ip :_,.. wasn:r e.0 „Fc`ur,u.,..u.
-
cn ' m ..
m
.�(
r
'
lu
Ca -dw
R O
-�
- 1'n
my
[[�H
.,oz
C
m
' A m
t °
•
--

Y
;.1
RT NUMBERS, r
t
f
RO65-100
SEND r> Ys"V;
f t t
TO: EENVIRONE
P ' O' 3. BOX,>1
ADVANCE: �N
)ATE OF REPORT; 03106/91
'
RECEIVED iAR i i i99
i C- EASTERN��AGRICULTURAL-.LABORATORIES"INC:
jet }.. , .... . ...
.. ... .r „� • . ; . ,
t
z1' WHITEPINE RD:
RICHM�ND VA. 23237 804-743-9401
st
5 ��
t r
f111STEs•DISP CUSTOMER
ACCT,.'# 45'129�
BEAM
., O
SAMPLES
0 06 5 '
r
SUBMITTED "
BY CHERMILLE PROD
ki
r PAGE—..
SOT[ ANAI YSTS.',.RFPnRT.: :.
� t j
, r
�9---m-u
`:dt}4
..:`
M)
ti
/..�
'R+y�y'�.,.
.te'ii'�.Rsexr�
.+tti.rw
1,12.a.''
:utau -
•� :daf
]..w TtTa
13
�l
1
0416
.'r. .'.��
.e�T.�.�.'.�<''1
.
4�.-c�..'isn'�+.S :
�4tpAf•1'',rMAa-�yC
l
:;�.ter'.' •..
.,.b'�.:� r.
'i�t�-„i.'e'�..si'�4.'�r�-'r�
}Kl.L
<.e.
,
.��._U..,i
'r ���.•��
'
....h:...,b'+
,.1._•:�k.ti�-':�:7.- `i1
yF�
.
t:rin
�rT,•'•.iS:l�1<',Fy�;
G-'ec'{..."ta
L.r
�as.
..riY-�;.` c�. •,ju'�(lF��v!
�®''r',",-
.�.r'•. •� "^.7..^..'YhL.f%`r+am:.��
L.,1�'+•.',,!1.,^..;rj�1-•�L-iYa:
cC� �
.
+n,^ �
Kr,.w:'>,{iia.+
E'v+L1rlr9'fiT
vg.
..srVryi:?it,.
•«r`7�^
�,;�_:�
��x�%S,J,F�.r
�:.iati•'{•ce1.',:F;,', y.�
t.^;.?',y:'S, d;
r•f
^�+'�":!
^mo,5,ta.�
�,u��.�^-_,s:;f�.,.,
ti�ti2
f• f d,�!..�„{9;t
�ifi.� .k-:-
,. Y
.
:nY.>i. Y7
'a}amr,,•':
rcE{f,
n�if
k+(r.�,'�y� r",j. '..z«'9F 'iC�.�._._•{,w'i• 'r'.=1�I
�•.`�..
.
.}'.•.
rgx�(:
.^
te
_r e. a(r.,�:a.yi..�N3..M��l�•��'�:;S`y*
(+-, 9
�; � .Iy!.1! �y;
r_
.c
,
..
a' �! L
.'
�.!
..m
f�'l•i,�,y&,
"c'.'�
.,�..',,.,:•'
i}^•
.�.
X'�/.+Xta. tI.s
°„l�h!.
',tJ�C^K:.!'cY'y4w..
'.
�9!.4-i."�
at,4.%✓Lc�
�,;%r.`
,. •t....
i:�..�.Yir�'..�Yf�S
�
f
.y
va.
y
r
`�'h�- t
y
•.4•:yl,
,.'..
.J
r ti,,
l`•F.if
.i....w
.i s�'.�:_Yda--
.w
1{
:v.
•
'r.r
�R e
777.7
04164
•
I /
t a • •
AT
v

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
N. C.
--,_GROUNDWATER SECTION
August 6, 1991
F` a .•4;-�.�t
n•:
MEMORANDI'TM:
TO : Dom iE
f- t..i;..; ,
t,rd i£rdt
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM: Gale Johnson
SUBJECT: City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
WQ0000430/GW91216
(John Seymour: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit
renewal request and recommends that the permit contain the
following conditions:
1. The Compliance Boundary for .the disposal system is
specified by regulations in 15A NCAC 2L,
Groundwater Classifications and Standards. An
exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards beyond
the Compliance Boundary is subject to the penalty
provisions applicable under General Statute
143-215.6(1)a. The sale of property, by the
Permittee, which is within or contiguous to the
disposal site, may alter the location of the
Compliance Boundary.
For facilities permitted on or after December 30,
1983, the Compliance Boundary is established at
the lesser of 250 feet from the land application
sites, or 50 feet within the property boundary.
If the title to any property which may affect the
location of the Compliance Boundary is changed,
the Permittee shall notify the DEM Director within
14 days. The Director shall then establish a
modified Compliance Boundary which will be done as
a modification to the Permit.
The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is
specified by regulations in 15A NCAC 2L,
Groundwater Classifications and Standards. A
REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around disposal
systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and

the perimeter of the waste disposal area. When
the concentration of any substance equals or
exceeds the maximum allowable concentration of
that substance at the REVIEW BOUNDARY, as
determined by monitoring, the permittee shall
either (i) demonstrate, through predictive
calculations or modeling, that natural site
conditions, facility design and operational
controls will prevent a violation of standards at
the Compliance Boundary; or, (ii) submit a plan
for the alteration of existing site conditions,
facility design or operational controls that will
prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance
Boundary, and implement that plan upon its
approval by the Director.
2. No land application of waste activities shall be
undertaken when the seasonal high water table is
less than three feet below land surface.
3. Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed
necessary by the Division, shall be provided.
GJ:hl/91216.
cc: Barbara -Christian
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 25, 1991
MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Floyd
FROM: Tony McManus—r
Subject: City of Cherryville Sludge Land
Application Permit Renewal
WQ#-0000430
GW# 91216
The Groundwater Section of the MRO recommends renewal of the
subject permit. This decision is contingent upon compliance of the
permit conditions.
If you have any questions, please advise.
TLM/pl

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bo,-,Vz
DATE: ��, �� 15 , 1 -19 1
FROM: Jack Floyd ��•-�
N. RE ' p QF P7�a FLlIZAF
Mai,
yy``
11�a�t��'l �f �.i 4niY'L:. 14'1. ii:lY:::.e9 Clffifli
:i_il?:aJ�L OFFICE i
SUBJECT: Application for ✓Renewal/Amendment of Permit No. LiG.0 3 0
New Permit
Facility Name C �.� at C.hQ.AAyV "I ll.�C__
County
Type of Project: ge
Central Office Contact: 4 �
Applicable Permit Numbers: WQ 0Uo64/sd GW 9/02/�
EPA AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your regional office for comment on or about
®/ /S 1 9 9 i
You should review the application package for completeness
and adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
�" aS , 199Ao that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at one time. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will be
provided to you. -
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, you should
review the application package and submit your comments to meby
4 S 199/
If a copy of the application package has not been made
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that
a copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
JF:ja/Appl.shl

GROUNDWATER SECTION GW
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REVIEW BY e5.5 e Lu'. l,Je lls DATE ii l/G1c�' FIELD INVESTIGATION? (Y/N) j'
FACILITY NAME OF 0—herrvv111
COUNTY lg-5fet''
LOCATION %V/ - 2 ro ies E. of fh
i u��. �,� ? 7 4
4
► 6 _5 c e,
Atfach eti IYZA:}P
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM ( LAGOON,
ETC.)
DESIGN CAP. (GPD )
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY6npL,_nt
50t�
oyu qa//cns a� s;urlvu
�
cL+- Llci t'c, rz o rnt c rcJ e-5
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT (FT. SQ)
& / OR
SIZE OF APPLICATION AREAS r;,(cb
WASTE SOURCE : 0 MUN. SLUDGE
MUN. W. WATER:
OPRIMARY
OSECONDARY TERTIARY
[—]IND. SLUDGE RIND. W. WATER
OTHERS
DISTANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO
NEAREST: STREAM
—' i a FT.,
WELL } i o G FT.
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE DEPTH
, PUMP RATE ( EST. )
WHAT DESIGN CONDI1IONS WILL REDUCE / INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION: 5J4cic e
he, 0-Aro »c m i clra,&!S
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITION$ WILL REDUCE / INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION :
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK •.> 5 u FT. , SEASONAL HIGH W. T. ^ /w`-25 FT. , ANNUAL W. T. FLUX rs' j0FT.
SURFICIAL AQUIFERI BEDROCK / ARTESIAN AQUIFER
GEN. LITHOLOGY San ciw %oAm li c� Sc^h;s
HYD. COND. IU + - I FT./DAY MEASURED J FT./DAY MEASURED
ESTIMATED OSTIMATED
THICKNESS FT.
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UP DOWN ; EXISTING : UP DOWN
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL. DESCRIPTION = tal� _0 5_0 -1-0 ( C $ _ 13 C�
T 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 68
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL.) _ SITUATION GRADE _
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S) : n/onlE PROPOSEQ.
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS It /s tec�,�m�nc%c:� a.f f%iere t'��c� be
:o e /s
GW-48 Revised 8/87
SUPERVISOR

I nn, 3173
x9x
3922
U)
LLI
274
SR /1&7 z
1
North Brook 4z
Sch No I
U
BM tollz
B9
3921
%do
J; i isa
A
-J
Vul
<
A Vt—
Un
A-
-7—'�77-7
? L
C L CO
GASTO-M—to
25'
J41
B j660• 3919
I in
Maiden —N
...Vale
?� �-y
- - 10 ----- —
IrA47 4 L I N �C 9 1
offer
6
d ncointon, Mang!
r
on
te tion
Lewisville
1638
3918
T ocation
Jo-hn P. 3ea,— Sr.
nof

1 r '
WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW.
Fixftty
fly EV
GW /?C7-7jj
Revbwer ;
Date:
SIeD 1
Deism*)* the dwanoe
POht vokie
0 1 2 3
rt
0n grad bsfwsen con-
4 b l 6) 7
e 9
i i CC)
tomlrntbn sauce and
Didonoe in
theism
2000 ♦
1000-2000 —"IS0-299 7b- �-�
10 - 19
D4tonce
wafefaply6vogOr
rp
60-74 20-34
0 - 9
streorn).
Dklonoe in
6200♦ 1001 -3100 251 -600 101- 160
31-60
lest
3100 - 6200 601- 1000 161- 250 61- 100
0 - 30
�GSII: if Walef table in peaTwoble bedrock pt. vok w .6: h poorly Permeable bedrock
SIeD 2
pl. vokie . 4
Esrirnlle the depth
Pont vokie
Niefers
�
0 1 2 3 4 (S) 6 7
8 p
It.
10the wderfable
604 30-60 20.29 12-29 !f 11 S7 3-4 W25
5.1 0
Depth
below base of con- Hof
2004 91-200 61-90 3o-60 26-35 16.25 9.15 3-8
0-2 0
W.T.
ton*KAk)n sauce
rrore ffxn 5 % of
the yea.
SIeD 3
FsthxAe wale(
tobis other*
PICAry vok in
Watef tobb
t
c'
a ry Gtoost loss Grader*
Grodatf
Gradient
from contormk.
gr axt
a hors drmod lea }hart
y than Ion tho i
than greater
groats(
olion ells
w dko
flow died kxt
op Wolof percent 2 percent
op water t1d 2 than 2
2 p
than 2
suppfes that toward towood pwoont
percent
are ckxer Wolof waler toword
toward
than 1000 supply but aipply Water
Wolof
meters not the and is the suppty
supply
anticipated onficip0ded but not
and Is the
dtec of direction of the orO
anticipated
Now lbw clpatsd
dkectbn
ckedbn
of flow
Of flow
Slop 4
Estimate of
pemroabWly.
sorPtbn btthe
waste dYposol ate.
0 A Row - Rock > too` _
bet.i>vv H be
sulwit
aoe '
01 ookmn -bedrock
Pal' 1
Peensobis
Yd
(41 ookxnn -bedrock. W
ll
or gti
cbv%bth Clean
no more Sand with Sond with gravel or
2=50 % 16 - 30 % less than Clean tine coorse
Clav .,..�
--
.....Jf
.....
sLaH
` Moro than 30
0-1,
2A
4A
6A
EA
9A
More than 95
I
1
1
11
1
11
1 II
I
11
1
II
25 -29
06
1C
1 D
2F
3E
4G
bF 6E
7F
8E
9G
9M
75 - 94
20 -24
OC
2C
tE
30
40
5E
6G 6F
7G
6F
9H
9N
60 -74
i 15 - 1p
1
CO
38
IF
4C
4E
iSH 7D
7H
8G
91
90
46 - 69
10 -14
OE
48
2D
b8
4F
160
b1 7E
71
9D
9J
�.45
3 - 9
18
68
2P
78
6C
51 r 0
7J
9E
9K
90
'10 - 27
Lsatfan3
iB
Be
3C
6C 1
50
98 I
5K 9C I
7K
9F
9L
9R
Lou thmI
Bedrock of fond skufoce; I - 5Z. I i . 9Z
D+gr+e «confidence In oxurOcy of vokm
Stan 4A
Pont 0(concern wits regard fo 000o min " sokroe is:
M20 0 AddMi0nrJ Qi W_ (Circle Orvy One)
..,:.. 11 ooc,ruc;K a tuna surso0e. use 10 (pkrs appropriate isttw)
6veryconfider*
kw omkied
-with low OmVkJonoe
W - near by wet
S - 4 kV / str.an
E - PO*rwtw of c=vGo ,o.
D - Cone of dsptesdon of neorby pkmphg Wet ins•
or wit bfY. lr*uortce cwwQ &wwv lbw
E • D1Margs h flip 1 bawd on seporotbn horn
conlornhc" Pkjm* rather thin pout source j
F • WW-0 saxOe in QrandwOtsr cleofnrge area,
thus -k*rld QraVldwa FN O_AOT hptlat of depth / didarce
K • Are- _dotbh by OMWgXx Ikrasohe
(o • 0
Pt. Vokie
Cep 1)
5 PVokie
(Slop 2)
4.
Pi. Value
(Step 3)
(O C
Cal eg0ry
(Step 4)
CorAdence
(Step 5)
Polo of Cofoem
(Step 6A)
M - Fw Mo rx ,c under so* hipt9y tidy
P - 611e Ina CKSOW01
Poor peroolatbn pafenffd (valve of 3 Or less h 9tep 4) (Step 68)
O - Wade sauce in grax+dwfer roc horg. area
T - Wcfet lab's in very hOW kcw-iured of 0averokr rock
y - 00 srtidedain by 1 Of more Ortedan CCOofs

y.
5
$fal, a
WASTE DISPOSAL -PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW WHEET ' (CONE)
Stte Wmerloal d«crptfon
Total Shp 1 Shp 2 Shp 3 ShP 4 Shp 6 Shp 6A Shp 68
( Add Steps 1- 4 (bmM letter, ) )
Sth Grade Based on "rageolog{c Parameten
Hazard POtentk*-k t ldenttfef (WM )
( Choose One) D
G I
B
0 H
+
A
c F
E
HPMI
(1) Numerlool5tte Desc(ptbn (team Step 7 )
Total
Perm/Sorp. HPM
�- I
61 + t:
0) PAR VAUJE (Stage 3)
i F
_5
SITUATION RATNG : (1) - (2)
Goble below)
SITUATION GRADE
no aft m m—
tsee table bolo,4
SITUATION GRADE
00 m orx
L J
(Joe table bekr4
x
WLIATI){V RATING TABLE
To be used for Wep 9 (f4akwd) and Sfep 10 ( Mod ed) O$OP 10)
3rrLiATK)N RATWQ PROSMUTY OF3IfUATKNI
(Combirwd Yakh) COt lit X"MON DEGREE OF ACCEPTAMM GRADE
Eorkm _ knprobabis Probc"V A
a fo 4 9 Pmbobl✓000eplobie a B
ato+3 �CN �oa�
9 Aoospknois unowlah c
+4 to +7 Pnbobly probo y UnOOO * bk► D
+8 or mow very PAbabih AJrnost outah to beF
urwooepfobh
iM probO of canfomon�lnattort tram spuallons Aavkip vd. befvwen t 7 and - 7 k dltficLe to cateportze
ra°Ndoc►ortV• TTwrefore, fhk f Ve of vakses topmenled by grader B and C. Is do*ywd Orly by a Wwtfon morv-
Acceplonoe or h4ectton of Oa dM for I ND kiiwKW purpose 4 a ►ospon*,,Wy of the particular reguk tacy cgency
and may depend on special requirernenti a(** agency or an ftasblty and emocutbn of approved
engh—dV Of a Wo (Moge 4).

_•-^__'---�•�.:.'�..`__ ... �._�-_-__.^`.. -•-.-• -- - --,-�^tea-:'�ti:.�'C+L>'l`'L)►=y �`•'-- s'r%Va Af�'Y� -,1• ':.t:
' >CII+IL, Lallll4ll\ ,•fr�.!�-i .iia.- _ ;:Aq��+Y,� ,.,��'+.
1 MtF L. N _
if L - j •
�!•r
.:. •..;.....:.-'^::%:::�•(": :':?n.»,Snu�Wutkatapc+l�• T_ •:a.:•_
sxla'LaNXI V ' a^ .. c skNN a. rLJrxl tL'v I . �'
pu x�l y 4>llY_wxw)ItaLllry puc wytoluawiJ)�tciP, �iS,jlalja
- aLXJr41 1,1M11)y K\NMx/,� rl .1,0�,C1 jW11. A1-llrl,(•n!(, L K,IC,1�w('7i(IIaY,'.-"",-�5,
l l+lN*) Oil uiylexypmetis. I {LytLv!wLxr iploiJi�lyNM>N!W?!)nLfl4'NL�JannbeNuj _�L(t -i•
M 1 1V• tll aI!lxal �id,l pta),r lya)i•JxJcUl:fulllluUSpx(aMll<f"IapYcxM M1vn1.w/.ymJ:;µauLLulrF+fyL•:/+rfi'c�„t�Y
v , wa i,r - nLmlianL,\I I*J%` W IpAw •4Lyuta' lol +{U
` .IIr.}vJ M.ilayll fl oollpsl(1 tit -;:`tL•'!Ll(L tall KeALti; -..
• � . � � � saLey.+Lxanla Jannhe Iny'p+p+w sl _xaituulciwp ('ur!nlwM+'•+Wiy-,xaL^TMyL•ia ��S'� :: , .
.• n>t.•eh ayVLxy(xN x,1,1;%Inuply
YRJ'+avtb(ILf•1!ILcxxr_ylwlsNLnu x(t ul wylrily lailr,dt:Y(•aywtxi Lw'put uNP j`+e ;�'.-R k .•ti: .
. J, Iltheua Lhe xllJad. ,t wl a iuxvdv ILaA _ • :
1 •1. JN aNM' iF ra>pl >pua . g,?uI M wg anyx vlq,l r.C.. .n c -.
.. - la>�Lr)a1xLNY �4t WLatle appLlsj r-pi, ttxxwuea:ILe1�T
- - • • . vy o niLiµue-^L mu1 mpr K"iwr Ic}i!!U:.),�y0':^` '. .. • :....
,! x lr )1 Ye, w [VI ww+ l J \'H�: Chr _•':
11\ K rkl s xNN , : 7L I Ja{I >4 4v4 (1"1'!L VL.- (L nqY . 'F t '(!S:k Sjj;rY • �v : j:.::.. ,
.. - - rl:. iuwwlntxr)•{x)e Wy1tJN41xM/).'-�IL,U.1N1fL•�iL. &FYI Y'•!!I .ZF,1Lt�M!� "t ._:•�'- �::5��_�: n_-•_*.
• ._ 2:JIr,!lxy Lplau In wyuaty pxncticK) ixgitviwaua l)a,xl',l)lx.ul iylp,Lx tllu; -
Ia1Ja IIhcxoiKjS IrJ. uuctuaiVdm 1t eaqurJ,l ,p1LNJ 1 I u�i•-r -`-tr,
- >ll!1\�tRl (a'tILItL»ll.. - .9 1 1! F� '(".. .14 Iw.. .. P 1•`t.%,tfk�,.: - .. t�•.
. - lwe pxkunpuatJl)aLecaysa afnx.W,�!+t`••IIA!!!9lntwxiLpiLipp,nal tl:fnlx(LjY �'••G�tiS :}LLji;� =••.
NuttpltLl� IL,I!tcal !1• y F'L4I ?tyY.:: .. .. .. ; )iLi:uiNN a1M1110 LP XP W 1IL A.i)Iwai V •L(S!D."+' is•LC
eA<L_
.. _ •� - :" •Llletaxl ni 3Iai11 fl �!t^llnCfl puc U!+)zutL'Kl. IL1I! ��"i'rJ•'u: •1�i� •>w`":. -: .
. - tL>,Itlle raft wL?rJnl,u1!nhe wq•p,pawrl'_luaiUIllauc*J lwr ugluluawi_j_"iYau� ,•ti:. ;
.-.vllyu.rLiv:GQW(!If_ezalL:,l!xit zµ)au uj wyLi:,q IL�>_WJ}c 0:(IjupFL pui�ilwilW�s.��'�. =r _c, ''•:�.e
''''.. -�• �uwl)t!2(UIuINI •icl:) •Pue; _ - - - __ ULSJIg,ildJnsJate,tici avlx>E a(iis atp wlitsauL!l aptc?iuudJly%•^?xLr?Fw LA•>l41? �' i? i:: w _.
�:,>txal'WWUWtLIS1nt(aaytxwLllltkl�:W��'�L
_ ssxJ>ntlu�y p sw l?Ci i aiLJi�a ill ]is p saltftuct3! ;� , r ti
.
.'r" - • •A • 3_11a: _n - •L .. - •L /�.]}S• WO.11 W I)d- =._a}_ _ j .
a)Is. Jv JxJnu�[>! »»pj _q(a�s1w ts�j xp of (+n A4 P?P�?�?d) WPV�.?4.i'I^; '9 • �i:''/'i
=..-•:. c'" atLnbss!Elul»»pIx(L_.(xjtllltm<pauozuoLj.Guplswsnhllbeputci!l
!mt_e� a � `^.i'a ii w h ^•e'd un • ' . •... xLLaL.:ti xixa',) - :- tuattuttllm,) uo ttcod 8u! aLx3.i xtt ix o Jo :r )au u vo L
JU ! iw 9 P�1 >7 A ,Ea 1
V fw 'N la!)1S .-. - •� _- _.r,..:•..' .
,•,->.r.. .. _ ' ,. ,,..,.., ... ..� :...... ' .. ..:>:::, : •.:•.'. ' � _ _ ••i4�l .x�t uYlNntiyiil .iip•!Jn, pintp,>twy!!tier+i.,utLti{ii':xuiqu�i',Lu(i��L� �- �:'::: '::' .
`•'H riilll:x .xtll:(NMj I•Ilrallll '1'^--'. ,`�• .i 'IL)ItrJ)Uax1U.)y:Lill'.xl:,)�LUJ(Ir!i!!yJlf(.ilU1,.l�IIINIt11C!Wt,,}tl%L, E�(LE •xllfilr tlll)1t�f�1`1v•.�•
xptnpa,nt.h:xlOwl twplsi<Ix!t•,!r,,:J,qn�!uril:,lunijt,!N1Lle.x!ILL{uni,3ipl<�x�.
�-'' �'-::. ": � �� � I .c!Sux�ui11'l.�pl,u.C,nntualnuntu+.i.Qy xpxl[+Inutp yuxuW.luu.,IxlnluY.xpulliuz;iaxl
iNnwu. Ln%lnu.xt'»LmulvrvlwvhurtWl,lr�.>.>,,.uxl)\�.'Ir,,'Sfuatxiurin{ueiuiL�i:';:-" _.
.. •• _1,_ i .r`+'. snnur., aip Out palr_,!ptq s! ya!tl„ •avtnw atp fit pauyaJ sL.x1.0 Sy tutmpurnuai yuu LpI% _,•
altad(h)1< Wri - •r ..r
j-no{)ulaq:>uc) JoJ suol:lpoo)
.y
ItnS 30 33)(73Q c
(ti musllop .�, jo
MILLYN-M.L.MLI.0d U)IY VII
. ,M110PKLJuwlgU_-r...,,,nL..�,1u_��....{•1•.
W t,h .,!.. 1.). • I^M1•:I'InJ•.ry.rnl•,v„lrwln111al1r-�Y,pnL1. r•..1 ,n.1, .l 1;!F1!11H,•p,.,LVI
.. S�xl Pue wil.Mt— 1•..1 v�L_grtl.. u:„+..I
.Kul^'a'NYnL+, r .I.r111N•. rNLa.,rL•.ri..,1NLr.nll,. 11rr•.l n.Iwl•. r.i nl..uu:ru••)
.u�-•pi1-1.•1.�..rr ..}I x(•r.u, ... rvl.wrv-r1.11•tv.l r..w.r1,...1.w 11.rn r:,y..•)
` -----1 ----
r
I -
a
I
I-
�
t X
(•l ,ulaYxc) twul:vnuti+lx
.itlntl ptlr Vi 'Yu 'it I tlps lunll (L)tilllxllj Vn•,,x) Jalr01(LvJ
Ixl .v.xl„ %r,Jr u! SYI!(Jrxw.xl ;tlCrL T•xI Jatc,ttp..,py.w! Ant,
ptlr. •t,lru.au3u :'IuurxrLLlr.,, uu) cilw)a!nhr'stal!nhe laxgµnu d+.)p
alxllw! ppuu, .ntL-xxLrumfuq lwc ummi tq:fj� p Jn Ixlr.iulltlr,
:auu.xl.ealS)atrJalrxu h•JaJ!uhr. uV x,lnpaurunh Jalmbraytnv. iq
xut. !wc Yq'VN Vc 1• ON% tuuJ1 paptll.wi) :tvlxn: Jabs :fury. anti
wrwxluy ural uc Juq titmawna:bnl,v xp uI tnJatnu aplr_wux7
Slaimal,tnu ,it! wcµA:vb s! tp!y,L uulsa mwjxnu titm .hy!yr_xuJxl
alyrur, 1l+ Jellnhr. try N-Ap4patatinp Jalmhc a,ulsu.w SpirJalwl c
l'I1 .iLuYalc t Iwu1,w 1!Lagac Sums
lxu: Yh vr. r dan anal pyxgaul llsly •palwlau! s! V..�\(I. J" (a t t i r
twpaat Jalwn avnus apn.• ar. palnnf!sap Japnbr. uV) :\vmn Jaw.,
)itn:Iuup turulxlwl ur. aq too ills! pae wtn .>•GryvJ .% ul aaryln
agt it f xt Klsa ,•! )u Iruauul algrxuJ.xl Sea, Sq ulrµ.w. c! gap)a
Jatnlhr. atm'Ama aptr:.XtuAd Sim Y map<uatarJnla J.innhc.un!aa,;
alr,a pauo)uny .xll.'auu:w aql K) a)r_,S Ira!:J.0 ,Ill uu Ialunld rl ptl: ()JY ayt Ell„ tanuua
' ul �unulla,�tul:u!:m:uwaay pataipr. xI ppxu, tnp slalulhr.111.,pl,plsu.,�11) a:lwu all!,
•xuaKic Jalmhc
dlyrl-Jdlra J(Iau )!pa!s taipc 1115nu lrtp lu itua:fl:unu a)5r N111 ntut711r. of per ]xu:U!ttimUl4
.lot cxlit Ilr. in>a!IJdr. suusu atL!. 'tuAltelid )illaYnnau ul yartuddr. title i0cK111n1d
pa.xlaa aql alr�!pu! ga!tf++ •.wive )r_,!mm .i!natl Jnnl No: suu:w .xp u!tpla IKIY
a.x1.x1!).Tlxa) Ir,J:f lt+ Ixlr..illttlalh JL: rUc tll azboiI—gill I Si xitaim;1 —1,
a.w.wh.,>vLa,lr_vilu!xlrStuur_.:ur_ur.:y.ar.' ;.c:Lti-'Na!- 41
- ' a,iL,ld>a..vlu aloagxulll Iwe.itpumb Ju rvr. ul a:G ..... II-:)

Generalized Site -Grade Based on Critical Hydrogeologic
Parameters
Critical H%drogeologic Parameter
Permeability -
Total
Distance
Water sorption
Grade
points
(maximum)
table Gradient (maximum)
A Excellent
G10
0
— — 2
3
B Very rtaxl
11.14
1
— —
4
C (Kxxl
15-17
2
— —
5
n F• '
18.20
3
— —
(E oniloor to
very rxx)r
•
>20
—
_ —
—
1
SITUATION
RATING TABLE
To be. used for Step 9 ( Natural) and Step 10 ( Modified)
(Step 10)
i
SITUATION RATING
PROBABILITY OF
SITUATION
( Combined Value)
CONTAMINATION
DEGREE OF ACCEPTABILITY
GRADE
8 or leas
Improbable
Probablyacceptable
A
-7 to -4
?
ably acceptable or
B
?
rnmpholy unacceptable
Acoaplance uxwioh
OC
-3 to 43 .
+4 to +7
Probably
Probably ==eptable
D
-
or marginally acceptable
+8 or more
Very Probable
Alrnodt certain to be
F
txtacceptable
sansroctorty. Tneterore, mis range or values represenTea ay graaea n aria t,, rs aesgnea exxy uy u Liw i"i i ai ti o,
Acceptance or rejection of oa site for the Intended purpose Is a respon"tty of the particular regulatory agency
and may depend on special requirements of the agency or on feasiblllty and execution of approved
engheerhg of a site ( Stage 4 ).
n

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
July 31, 1991
Ms.Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South 1`-lountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina W8021
Subject
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge Renewal
Gaston County
Dear Ms. Hovis: plU/el�
The Permits and En'gmeering Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application. ` f
The following items must be addressed before we can complete our review. Please note
that these items must be received by September 30, 1991, in order to prevent your project form
being returned.
l . In order to evaluate the request for renewal of the subject land application of sludge
program, it is necessary to review a recent application site soil analysis for each site that has been
land applied to insure the soil constituents do not exceed EPA limits, and it is necessary to review a
recent sludge analysis to see if the sludge is significantly different from the initial permitting and
that it does not exceed EPA limits. Please provide a representative soils analysis for each site that
has received sludge and a sludge analysis that includes TCLP, as required by conditions III.3 and
IIIA of the current permit.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call me at 919/ 733-5083.
Sincerely,
John Seymour
Environmental Engineer
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�6� l��areSlr►!!r � D, cj��
I
July 1, 1991
Environmental Waste Recycling, Inc.
Ms. Carolyn:.McCaskill
Permits and Engineering Section
Division of Environmental Management
NC DEHNR
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Subject: WQ0000430-Permit Renewal
Land Application of WWTP Sludge
City of Cherryville, NC
Gaston, NC
Dear Ms. McCaskill:
N. C. DEPT. Of Jv:1ITTRAL
v S !0¢��7
...._....1ELILMy
MOORESVILLE IIE UNI- I. OFFICE
f V
E ., E
n
qp
M
���11
J �
L� .
JUL 9
199!
Enclosed please find the materials necessary for permit
renewal of WQ0000430 Land Application of WWTP Sludge
generated by the City of Cherryville, North Carolina.
Quadruplicate copies of the permit renewal forms are provided
along with a check for the $250.00 processing fee.
Please contact our office if any additional information is
required to complete the renewal. Thank you.
Sincerely,
-, d7 X&/-
Greg Mackin
Technical Services
Rt. 4, Box 37-B • Advance, NC 27006 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period.of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application_
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the .
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter - and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
111111111l111111l111i1i11111lllliilfl111111111111111111111111111111111111111fill IIIIIIII1iHIM fill 111]111111111111
RESTRICTIONS:
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 f III II11111111111[fill 11111111111111111111111111111111
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein „"
—v (jamLand Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, G t uifi~ COUNTY,
_-7
L the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
A JvArl-
WITNESS my hand o i seal this 4 day of , 19 1(
s
x
NOTARY�'2
My commission Expires x �PiJBLIC i
X 0
I. have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
I, 7(1GL to t c e /—f o U ! s have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
City of Cherryville WWTP
Permittee
Date
22 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
xortb Carolina Bibigion of
�t�l�iro�tm��t�Y �a�tta�g�m�tt�
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND.APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: City of Cherryville, NC
Contact Person: Ralph Childers
Address of Permittee: 116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
Cherryville's WWTP'Sludge
Site ID Number: 1-16
Field Number: 1-16
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
Along Hwy 182, East of Hwy 274
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application: Stowe Leonha,%&
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: Corn Silage, Small Grains and Hay
Intended use or disposition of crops: E i ve s t o c k Feed
11l11l1l11111l111l11111111111111111l11111l111111111111111111l1111111111111111l11111111111111111l11111111111111111111
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
City of Cherryville, NC
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land'application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 .(4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
11i1111111111111111111111111111l111111111I1111l1111111111l11111101l11111111111111111l1111111l1111111111l111111111111
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each. parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials -or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge.or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes. an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
20 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the .
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter - and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
1111111111111111111111111111111111!! I1111111111! 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111111111111111
RESTRICTIONS:
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111lIIIIlilllillllillllllillllllllll
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
Permittee to apply sludge/residual to' my lands as specified h�reiA I Zzle
Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, G !N GO (a COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that Pz-,x—.s /rF e �
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and o , cial seal this ?i day of V L wt% , 19 ql
My commission Expires
L have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. 1
-P
Lessee
Date
I, Y J dw l c e, H C V 13 have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
City of Cherryville WWTP
Permittee
x � 9
Date
22 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 24 (4/91)
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
City:
Telephone No.
S tate: Zip:
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I, , attest that this application for
has been reviewed by me and is accurate
and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain
portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of
these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have
judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Registration No.
Print Name of Engineer -
Seal and Signature (specify date):
Applicant's Certification:
yt i c o 15 , attest that this application for
City of-Cherryville,Land Application of WWTP sludge
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting
information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as -
incomplete. /1
Signature x �d Date & - a/ - 1
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 919/733-5083
24 of 25

lu
State of Forth Carolina
Department of Environml ent, Health, and Natural Resources
Division. of E ivironmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
WtWam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary N' c' DE". DF NAq'URAZ Director
Its;40LTTZCTS AND
Ca?§a;;�rr-i1 d, Z,.LJEd.Q1'itii�ij'y`
'19MY 20, 1991
JANICE HOVIS
CHERRYVILLE, CITY -LAND Z 0V L Fic'P I;�L OFFICE
116 S MOUNTAIN STREET
CHERRYVILLE, NC 28021
SUBJECT: PERMI'C NO. WQ0000430
CHERRYVILLE, CITY -LAND APP.
GASTON COUNTY
Dear Permittee:
Our files indicate that the subject pernr:it issue(] oti 1.1/27/90 expires on
2/28/92. We have not received a request. for ronownl Cram you as of this date.
A renewal request shall consist of a letter redrresting renewal and completion of
the enclosed application, submitted in tripl.icnt.e. A processing fee must be submitted
with the request. Please find attached a copy of tare 15 NCAC 21-I .0205(c) regulations.
The processing fee for your facility is based orr toredesign or permitted flow,
whichever is appropriate, listed in the first four cal: esores of facilities. Sludge
renewals are based on total acres of land perm i tl.ecl. If' the facility covered by this
permit contains some type of treatment works, a narrntivr clescripton. of the sludge
management plan that is in effect at. tlrn ['nc:i-] U. y mnst be, submitted with the
application for renewal.
The Environmental Management Commission nrlol,l.ecl r r v i :r.<I rules on October 1, 1990
(attached), requiring the payment of an �.rnnrrnl fern for mosi. pe.rmit-ted foci-lities. You
will be billed separately for that fee (:if ahl, l i cahl (­�) , a fi. r your. permit is approved.
Please be advised that this permit: must not hn nllnwn,,i to expire. If the renewal
request is not received within. 180 days prior- r.o 1hr. 1wr,nit's expiration date as
required by 15 NCAC 2H .0211, you will. be assnss(,d on nnl:vmnt. i.c civ:i_l. penalty. This
civil penalty by North Carolina General Statirtc,� may Irn ns much as $10,000 per day. If
a permit renewal request is not received 180 cinys he fore Ire.rnr:i.t expiration, a civil
penalty of at least $300 will be assessed. 1;rn-gnr pennit:ics< may be assessed depending
on how late the request is made. In add:i.t:ion, any hermit. renewal request received
after the permit's expiration date will be cons:i(lQ-1-;d ns n now application and will be
required to pay the higher permit appl:i.cat:i_orr Fen.
Pouution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Ooaortunity Affirmative Action Emplover

Page 2
The letter requesting renewal, along w:i_tb n compleLed Non -Discharge Permit
application and appropriate standard fee, should Ire sent W
Permits and Engineering Unit
Division of Environmental. Management
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611--7687
The check should be made payable to the Nor.Ll, Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR).
If you should have any questions or need any ndd.itionnI information regarding this
matter, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
e.1C_
Carolyn McCaskill, Supervisor
State Engineering Review Group
cc:Mooresvi�lle Regnna� 0=f"'ice
Permits and Engineering Unit
Central Files

FF f,
�•..,. LLr-r. OF NATURAL
RESOUREES AND
✓`"' COIMMUNITY DEVELOPAM T
DEC 31990.
BtYfSI'JN OF It„'��;;,:`.=;,;f1 I,iAfd:1GEMEHT
State of North Carolina
I��a3ESs7 LE o c"B;�AL OffICE
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
November 27, 1990
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. WQ0000430 Amendment
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
In accordance with your amendment request received May 18, 1990, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. WQ0000430 as amended, dated November 27, 1990, to City of Cherryville
for the continued operation of the subject sludge land application program. This amendment
includes the addition of a new site for the application of sludge and the modifications requested.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 1992, shall
hereby void Permit No. WQ0000430 issued March 9, 1990, and shall be subject to the conditions
and limitations as specified therein. i
U
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit amendment are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within 30 days following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 11666, Raleigh, NC 27604. Unless such demands are
made this permit shall be final and binding.
One set of approval documents is being forwarded to you. If you need additional
information concerning this matter, please contac>4s�Carolyn McCasldll. at 919n 733-5083.
George T.
cc: Lincoln County HealthTDeartment
f e��ceg artal vnlee
r undwater Section
Environmental Waste Disposal
Training and Certification
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�e Q DEPT. OF NATURAL
RESOUIRCES AND
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION DEC 3 1990
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATUR MUS URIl >� MA1F. V'►�T
QO�ES�l11E RESI K L OFFICE
RALEIGH
SLUDGE LAND APPLICATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Cherryville
Lincoln County
FOR THE
continued operation of a sludge land application program consisting of the land application of
sludge from the City of Cherryville's Wastewater Treatment Facility to the sites identified in
condition number VI, 6 of this permit with the addition of fields 11 through 16 with no discharge
of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received August 18, 1989 and the
request for amendment received May 18, 1990, and in conformity with the project plan,
specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit.
i
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until Februaryb28, 1992, and shall
be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The Mooresville Regional Office, phone no. 704/ 663-1699, and the appropriate
local governmental official (county manager/city manager) shall be notified at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the initial application of the sludge so that an
inspection can be made of the application sites and application method. Such
notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours
from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays. Also the Lincoln County Manager's office must be notified prior to the
initial application so that they will be aware that the operation has been initiated.
2. This permit shall become voidable if the soils fail to adequately absorb the wastes
and may be rescinded unless the sites are maintained and operated in a manner
. which will protect the assigned water quality standards of the surface waters and
ground waters.
3. The land application program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a
non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastes resulting from the
operation of this program.

4. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
5. In the event that the land application program is not operated satisfactorily, including
the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall cease applying sludge to the
sites and take any immediate corrective actions, including the construction of
additional or replacement wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.
6. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
7. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and
18% for subsurface applications.
8. The following buffers zones shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet from residences under separate ownership for surface application
method, however the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimum of
100 feet upon written consent of the owner.
b) 200 feet from residences under separate ownership for injection method,
however the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a minimum of 100 feet
upon written consent of the owner.
c) 100 feet from "SA and SB" classified waters and public surface water supplies
for both methods,
d) 50 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes, rivers,
and surface water drainage ways for injection method.
e) 100 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes, rivers
and surface water drainage ways for surface application method,
f) 100 feet from property lines for both methods,
g) 50 feet from public right of ways for surface application methods,
h) 25 feet from public right of ways for subsurface disposal methods,
i) 10 feet from upslope interceptor drains and surface water `diversions for both
methods,
j) 25 feet from downslope interceptor drains, surface water diversions,
groundwater drainage systems and surface drainage ditches for both methods.
9. A copy of this permit shall be kept at the land application site when sludge is being
applied during the life of this permit. A spill prevention and control plan shall be
kept in all sludge transport and application vehicles.
10. All sludges included in this permit must be stabilized by a process to significantly
reduce pathogens (as described in 40 CFR Part 257, Appendix II) prior to
application or incorporation. An evaluation of all sludges as specified in condition
I14 must be conducted as to their ability to demonstrate compliance with ?his
requirement. A copy of this report must be submitted to the Assistant Chief for
Operations, Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section,
Operations Branch, PO Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687, within six (6)
months of the permit issue date.
11. Specific sludge application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site
prior to and during sludge application.
.�12. No sludge at any time shall be stored at any applicat}'on site.
2

II
2
3.
9
1�
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The facilities and disposal sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all
times.
A suitable vegetative cover as listed in condition H 3, shall be maintained in
accordance with the crop management plan approved by this Division.
The application rates shall not exceed the following for the specified crops:
Crops PAN (lbs/acre/year)
Corn 150
Sudex 150
Small Grains 100
Fescue 250
No sludges other than the following are hereby approved for land application in
accordance with this permit:
Source County Permit No.
Cherryville Gaston NC0044440
Estimated
Volume ( ag_ lions/year or dry ty ons/,year)
1,000,000 gal./yr. or 326 dry tons/ yr.
The lifetime heavy metal loadings shall not exceed the following for the
corresponding Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC):
Parameter
CEC < 5
Lead (lbs/acre)
500 /
Zinc (lbs/acre)
250
Copper (lbs/acre)
125
Nickel (lbs/acre)
125
Cadmium (lbs/acre)
4.5.
6. The Permittee shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in
responsible charge of the land application operation. The operator must hold a
certificate of the grade at least equivalent to the classification assigned to the
land application program by the Certification Commission.
7. Adequate facilities shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed or stored material into any surface waters.
8. Animals should not be grazed on sludge applied land within a 30-day period
following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing
shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access after each application.
9. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced within twenty-four (24) hours
after application on lands with no cover crop established.
10. For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, sludge
may be applied during periods of dry weather. The sludge must be incorporated
into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of application.
3

11. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application
sites during active site use and for the 12-month period following sludge application.
(Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.)
12. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
13. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or until 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency sludge disposal
measures must first be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
14. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge
application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5 provided a
sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, sludge and
soil mixture of at least 6.5.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, sludge, soil, or plant
tissue analyses) deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management
to insure protection of the environment will be established and an acceptable
sampling and reporting schedule shall be followed. If monitoring data indicates
minimal or no concern to the Division, reduction of monitoring requirements may be
pursued after two annual reporting periods.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all disposal activities.
These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following
information: 1
6r
a) source of sludge
b) date of sludge application
c) location of sludge application (site, field, or zone #)
d) method of application
e) weather conditions
f) soil conditions
g) type of crop growing on field
h) volume of sludge applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
i) annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of sludge, annual and
cumulative pounds/acre of each heavy metal, annual pounds/acre of plant
available nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied
to each field.
3. A representative annual soils analysis shall be conducted of each site receiving
sludge in the respective calendar year and the results maintained on file by the
Permittee for a minimum of five years. The soils analysis shall include but is not
necessarily limited to the following parameters:
El

Standard Soil Fertility Test
% Base Saturation
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Magnesium
pH
Manganese
Cation Exchange Capacity
Sodium
Nickel
Cadmium
Copper
Calcium
4. A quarterly sludge analysis and annual Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) analysis shall be conducted by the Permittee and the results maintained on
file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. If land application occurs at a
frequency less than quarterly, sludge analysis will be required for each instance of
land application. The sludge analysis shall include but is not necessarily limited to
the following parameters:
% total solids
Magnesium
Chlorides
Sulfate
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cadmium
Chromium
Sodium
Calcium
Total Nitrogen
Ammonia Nitrogen
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
The TCLP analysis shall include the following parameters:
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Cadmium >
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chromium
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
Cresol
2,4-D
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Endrin
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachloroethane
Lead
Lindane
Mercury
Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
Selenium
Silver
Tetrachloroethylene
Toxaphene
Trichloroethylene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Vinyl chloride
5. Three copies of all monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in conditions
1111, III 2, III 3 and III 4 shall be submitted annually on or before March 1 of
the following year to the following address:
5

NC Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
6. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville, Regional Office
telephone no. 704/ 663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application program which results in the
land application of significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in
quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a discharge of
wastes to receiving waters.
C. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has
gone out of compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit
or the parameters on which the system was designed.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render
the facility incapable of adequate sludge treatment.
C. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting
sludge to the application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in
letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem
does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. Any groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the Division of
Environmental Management shall be provided.
2. No land application of waste activities shall be undertaken when the seasonal high
water table is less than three feet below land surface.
V . INSPECTIONS
0

VI
1. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the sludge storage, transport, and
disposal facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and
discharges which may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a
threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall keep an inspection log
or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations made,
and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This
log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of three years
from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon 'request by the
Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the disposal site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the land application activities are carried
out in accordance with the conditions of this permit and in the manner approved
by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to
change ownership or a name change of the Permittee, a formal &mit request must
be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an
application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting
materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered
on its merits and may or may not be approved.
4. Prior to any transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
5. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreements between the Permittee
and the landowners/lessees are in full force and effect.
6. The following are approved sites and crops for sludge application on a three (3) year
rotation:
Site No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Table Continued -
Owner/Lessee
John P. Beam, Sr.
John P. Beam, Sr.
John P. Beam, Sr.
John P. Beam, Sr.
John P. Beam, Sr.
John P. Beam, Sr.
Application Area (excluding buffers)
acres
12
10
12.7
28
12
17
7

-Continued
7
John P. Beam, Sr.
26
8
John P. Beam, Sr.
20
9
John P. Beam, Sr.
13.5
l l *
Stowe Leonhardt
24.0
12*
Stowe Leonhardt
16.0
13*
Stowe Leonhardt
14.0
14*
Stowe Leonhardt
10.0
15*
Stowe Leonhardt
12.0
16*
Stowe Leonhardt
3.5
TOTAL 230.7
*These sites are operated by Mr. John P. Beam, Sr.
7. . Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental
Management in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
8. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within
thirty (30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee
accordingly may cause the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as
specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
9. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
10. A set of all the approved documents for the subject project must be retained by the
applicant for the life of the project.
11. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall
request its extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review
the adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the
permit for such period of time and under such conditions and limitations as it may
deem appropriate.
12. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions,
limitations and monitoring requirements the Division of Environmental Management
deems necessary in order to adequately protect the environment and public health.
13. Issuance of this permit hereby amends Permit No.WQ0000430 issued March 9,
1990.
Permit issued t ' he 27th day of November, 1990
N TH AROL ENV AL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
George T. Everett ire to
Division of Envi nmental a ement
By Authority of Enviro n Management Commission
Permit No. WQ0000430 Amendment

Mi

y � i
e

t��
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 13, 1990
MEMORANDUM TO: Don Safrit
r. cr
FROM: D. Rex Gleason
PREPARED BY: Allen Hardy AR'
SUBJECT: Amendment of Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County, N.C.
This memo is in regards to a request by the City of Cherryville
to amend the subject permit to include land owned by Stowe Leonhardt
in the City's land application program.
A site investigation was conducted on June 6, 1990; and the
additional land application fields appeared to be suitable. The
fields will include the growth of small grains and fescue as well as
corn and sudex. The application schedule for each proposed field
will be put into a three (3) year rotation along with the previously
permitted sites.
Sections VI.13 (General Conditions) and II.3 (Operator and
Maintenance Requirements) should be amended in the permit as stated
in the description section of the application.
A soils analysis was completed and it was recommended that lime
be added to adjust the soil pH to 6.5 prior to sludge application.
It is recommended that the additional farm land be included in
the land application program provided that buffer zones are met,
sludge is applied at agronomic rates, Groundwater Section provides
comments, and the Permits and Engineering Unit reviews and approves.
WAH/bb

v
TO:
DXrF
SUBJECT:
smwa,
i R \jrodina, Deipaftent o Environment :o h Ca
Health,: and Natural Resources
QoNOW
-

^
F�CILJTY AND PERMIT DATA
UPDATE OPTION TRXZO 5OU KEY W00880438
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYINl-� F[R PEFF.MIT APONERMIT FEE-$ 250.80 REGI ON
FACILITY NAME> CHERRYVZLLE, CITY -LANE, APF^ 5 COUNTY> GASTON 03
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIREED) ENGINEER: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DZSPO
STREET: 116 S MOUNTAIN STREET STREET' PO BOX 178
__CITY�_R CHERYVILLE ST NC ZIP 28021 CITY: ADVANCE ST NC ZIP 27806
'�LEPHONE 784 435 4184 _ : 919 99B 8184
FTA7E CONTACT> MCCAS1<ILL FACILITY CONTACT JANZCE HOVIS
TYPT OF PROJECT) SLUDGE LAND APPLICATION LAT: LONG :
DATE AFF RCVD 8�/1B/98 N=NEW,M=MODIFZC�4TZON,R=REZSSUE> M
DATE f�[J<N�W�E��ED 85/20/98 DATE REVIEWED / / RETURN DATE
DATE I]ENZEI} / / NPDES �-
RE[� RCVD / / DATE RETURNED / / TRZB Q -----������ MGI]
AD[} NNFO REDS / / OT AG COM REDS / / TRIB DATE-
ADE ZNFO RCVD / / OT (*-,[-- COMRCVD / /
END BTAT APP P 8B/16/98 DATE ISSUED / / DATE EXPIRE 82/28/92
FEE CODE( 6 )10(>iMGD)'2=(>18KGD),3=(>1KGD),4=(<1KGD+SF),5=(S>3O '),6=(S<=388A),
7=/SENDE') B=(SEDEL) 9=(CLRE[�) 8=(NO FEE) DISC CODES 81 ���
._ _ , , , ASN/CHG KRMT
CERT D�TE 11/11/11 LAST CONBILL( )
COM�ENT��
MESSAGE *** DATA MODIFIED SUCCESSFULLY *** '
_
%JImION Uf ENVmONmENmm��9
MAY go go 19So
NOt-ll NPDES
�
' ZLITPERMIT DATA
UPDATE ZUN TRXII] 5OU KEY
'
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT APP/PERMIT FEE-$ 250.88 REGION
FACILITY NAME)- CHERRYVILLE, CITY -LAND APP. 5 COUNTY>GASTON 83
ADDRESS MAILING (REQUIRED) ENGINEER: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DZSPO
STREET 116 S MOUNTAIN STREET STREET: PO BOX 178
CITY: CHERRYVZLLE ST NC ZIP I8021 CITY: ADVANCE ST NC ZIP 27086
TELEPHONE [phone] TELEPHONE: 91999B 8184
STATE CONTACT) SEYMOUR FACILITY CONTACT JANICE HOVIS
TYPE OF PROJECT> LAND APP.-SLUDGE- LAT: LONG:
DATE ARP RCVD 88/18/89 N=NEW,M=MOTlIFZCATION,R=REZSSUE> R
DATE ACKNOWLEDGED 88/21/B9 DATE REVIEWED 11/87/B9 RETURN DATE
REG COMM REDS; 88/29/89 DATE DENIED / / NPDES #- _________
RE[� COMM RCV� ` 18/25/89 DATE RETURNED / / TRIB Q ^ ^O88G MOD
ADD INFO REDS 11/89/89 OT AG COM REDS 8B/29/89 TRZB DATE-
AD] lNFS RCVD 81/11/90 OT AG CQM RCVD 82/27/98
END 3TAT APP P 84/11/90 DATE ISSUED 83/09/90 DATE EXPIRE 02/28/92
�
FEE CODE( 6 )1=(>1MGD),2=(>1BK[�D),3=(>1KGD),4=(<1KGD+SF),5=(S>388A),6=(S<=30OA) .
7=(SENDEL)'B=(SB]EL)'9=(CLREC),C=(NO FEE) DISC CODES 81 55 ASN/CH� P�MT
ENG CERT DATE 11/1i/11 LAST NOV DATE / / CONBZLL( )
COMMENTS: TRANSFER TO SEYMOUR ON 12/i9/89^ NCO.
MESSAGE: *** ENTER DATA FOR UPDATE ***

r q, 0 ' q(-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street 0 Raleigh, North -Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Date:
19 "A_1 Director
SUBJECT
7
Application No.
A
WQ L
_Jj
Dear
The Divisions Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
materials on This application has been assigned the number shown above. Please
19L —
refer to this number when making' inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to for a detailed engineering
review. A technical acknowledgement will be forthcoming. If ihis acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30)
days, please contact the engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Divisiods regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the Regional Super-
visor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the Division.
If you have any questions, please call the review engineer listed above at [phone].
rRISIGN OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANARENEW
0 AY ; J "--�
AY 3 1990
Sincerely
Donald Safrit P.E.
MODRES'.ILLE
r 9EU=XSVEWF Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
REGIONAL 0fVW
CC: egional Supervisor
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO PERMIT NO. WQ0000430
AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION - LAND APPLICATION
CHERRYVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
II. CURRENT PERMIT
III. ANALYSIS
IV. SITES
V. SOILS

APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO PERMIT NO. WQ0000430
AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION - LAND APPLICATION
CHERRYVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
The City of Cherryville in Lincoln County, NC produces an estimated
1,000,000 gallons of treated sewage sludge annually at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Cherryville hereby proposes to amend the current
permit for the land application of municipal sludge to include the
additional farm site detailed within this document. This additional
acreage in combination with the land currently permitted will be
sufficient to conduct an agricultural utilization.program via a three
(3) year rotation.
Portions of the current permit should be modified to represent the
Cherryville land application program with the addition of the new
acreage. ection VI.13 (General Conditions) should be modified or
dropped from the permit so that all of Cherryville's annual volume,
1,000,000 gallons, can be land applied. Section II.3 (Operation and
Maintenance Requirements) should be amended to included small grains and
fescue which will eventually be rotated into the cropping sequence for
several of the fields. A copy of the current permit has been included
with this application packet for use as a reference. Please see the
following section labeled PERMIT.
Representative samples of the sewage sludge have been analyzed for
Total Sludge and E. P. Toxicity. The analyses indicate that the sludge
is non -toxic and non -hazardous. Under a carefully managed application
program this sludge will offer valuable nutrients and soil amenders to
the permitted sites. Copies of the analytical results and the proposed
application rates along with relevant calculations are contained in the
section labeled ANALYSIS.
The sludge will continue to be sampled and monitored in the manner set
forth in the permit for Cherryville's land application program. Records of
the required sludge constituents (Nutrients and Metals) will continue
to be maintained accordingly. Copies of these records will be provided
to the City of Cherryville, the NC Dept of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources and the farm operators of the permitted sites.

Cherryville Amendment
The site to be added consists of 9�acre An estimated 79.5 acres
are applicable for land application. The applicable acres were
determined by eliminating the buffer zones and restrictions specified
by the updated Administrative Code Section: 15NOAC2H .0200 Waste Not
Discharged in Surface Waters dated August 1, 1988.
The section labeled SITES contains a location, site, field, topo and
soils map for each proposed application site. The field map indicates
the buffer zones, locations of houses, wells, wet areas and slopes that
have been excluded from the proposed sludge application. The site map
includes the approximate location of the auger borings. These maps
have been modified to represent structural features current to January,
1990.
The section labeled SOILS contains a soil analysis and recommendation
of lime to adjust the soil pH to 6.5 as required. The sites will be
properly limed prior to sludge application. Each site receiving sludge
will be sampled and analyzed annually to monitor the soils. This
section also contains information published by the Soil Conservation
Service pertaining to the soil types on the proposed application sites.
Because this request for amendment is an agricultural utilization
program, sludge application rates will be designed according to crop
requirements and soil retention capacities. The application schedules
for each permitted field will be on a three (3) year rotation. The
liquid sludge will be loaded into the transport/application vehicle in
a manner that will not allow any spillage. The sludge will then be
applied to the field at agronomic rates as specified by permit. When
sludge is applied to crop land it will be incorporated into the soil
within 24 hours of application. The sludge will be surface applied to
the grassland in accordance with the NCDEHNR regulations so as not to
disrupt the hay or pasture crop production.
EWD remains dedicated to providing environmentally sound and
agriculturally beneficial land application programs. Please contact
our office if you have any comments, questions or require any further
information to facilitate a timely review of our request for amendment.
Respectfully Submitted,
Grace Draman
President

� � G MAR 1 2199
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
March 9, 1990
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
-In accordance with your application received August 18, 1989, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. WQ0000430, dated March 9, 1990, to City of Cherryville for the operation of
the subject sludge land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 1992, and shall
be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Issuance of this permit hereby
amends Permit No. WQ0000430 issued December 12, 1988.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 11666, Raleigh, NC 27604. Unless such demands are made this permit shall
be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John
Seymour at 919/ 733-5083.
cc:
incerely, ,
4--
George T. Eve ett
Lincoln County Health Department
Gaston County Health Department
resville Regional Office
1,1 nvironmental Waste Disposal
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
SLUDGE LAND APPLICATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Chenyville
Lincoln County
FOR THE
operation of a sludge land application program consisting of the land application of sludge from
the City of Cherryville's wastewater treatment facility to the sites which are identified in this
permit with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received
August 18, 1989, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 1992, and shall
be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The Mooresville Regional Office, phone no. 704/ 663-1699, and the appropriate
local governmental official (county manager/city manager) shall be notified at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the initial application of the sludge so that an
inspection can be made of the application sites and application method. Such
notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours
from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays. Also the Lincoln County Managers office must be notified prior to the
initial application so that they will be aware that the operation has been initiated.
2. This permit shall become voidable if the soils fail to adequately absorb the wastes
and may be rescinded unless the sites are maintained and operated in a manner
which will protect the assigned water quality standards of the surface waters and
ground waters.
3. The land application program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a
non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastes resulting from the
operation of this program.

4. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
5. In the event that the land application program is not operated satisfactorily, including
the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall cease applying sludge to the
sites and take any immediate corrective actions, including the construction of
additional or replacement wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.
6. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
7. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and
18% for subsurface applications.
8. The following buffers zones shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet from residences under separate ownership for surface
application method,
b) 200 feet from residences under separate ownership for injection method,
c) 100 feet from "SA and SB" classified waters and public surface water
supplies for both methods,
d) 50 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes,
rivers, and surface water drainage ways for injection method.
e) 100 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes,
rivers and surface water drainage ways for surface application
method,
f) 100 feet from property lines for both methods,
g) 50 feet from public right of ways for surface application method,
h) 10 feet from upslope interceptor drains and surface water diversions for
both methods, -
i) 25 feet from downslope interceptor drains, surface water diversions,
groundwater drainage systems and surface drainage ditches for both
methods.
9. A copy of this permit shall be kept in all sludge transport and application vehicles
during the life of this project.
10. All sludges included in this permit must be stabilized by a process to significantly
reduce pathogens (as described in 40 CFR Part 257, Appendix II) prior to
application or incorporation. An evaluation of all sludges as specified in condition
H 4 must be conducted as to their ability to demonstrate compliance with this
requirement. A copy of this report must be submitted to the Assistant Chief for
Operations, Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section,
Operations Branch, PO Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687, within six (6)
months of the permit issue date.
11. Specific sludge application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site prior
to and during sludge application.
12. No sludge at any time shall be stored at any application site.
2

1
2.
3.
4.
5.
The facilities and disposal sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all
times.
A suitable vegetative cover as listed in condition H 3, shall be maintained in
accordance with the crop management plan approved by this Division.
The application rates shall not exceed the following for the specified crops:
Crops
PAN (lbs/acre/year)
Com
150
Sudex
150
No sludges other than the following are hereby approved for land application in
accordance with this permit:
Estimated
Source County Permit No. Volume (gallons/year or da tons/year)
Cherryville Gaston NCO044440 1,000,000 gal./yr. or 217 dry tons/ yr.
(see condition VI 13)
The lifetime heavy metal loadings shall not exceed the following for the
corresponding Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC):
Parameter
CEC < 5
Lead abs/acre)
500
Zinc abs/acre)
250
Copper abs/acre)
125
Nickel (lbs/acre)
125
Cadmium abs/acre)
4.5
6. The Permittee shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in
responsible charge of the land application operation. The operator must hold a
certificate of the grade at least equivalent to the classification assigned to the
land application program by the Certification Commission.
7. Adequate facilities shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed or stored material into any surface waters.
8. Animals should not be grazed on sludge applied land within a 30-day period
following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing
shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access after each application.
9. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced within twenty-four (24) hours
after application on lands with no cover crop established.
10. For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, sludge
may be applied during periods of dry weather. The sludge must be incorporated
into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of application.
3

11. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application
sites during active site use and for the 12-month period following sludge application.
(Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.)
12. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
13. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or until 24 hours following 'a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency sludge disposal
measures must first be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
14. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge
application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5 provided a
sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, sludge and
soil mixture of at least 6.5.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, sludge, soil, or plant
tissue analyses) deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management
to insure protection of the environment will be established and an acceptable
sampling and reporting schedule shall be followed. If monitoring data indicates
minimal or no concern to the Division, reduction of monitoring requirements may be
pursued after two annual reporting periods.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all disposal activities.
These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following
information:
a) source of sludge
b) date of sludge application
c) location of sludge application (site, field, or zone #)
d) method of application
e) weather conditions
f) soil conditions
g) type of -crop growing on field
h) volume of sludge applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
i) annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of sludge, annual and
cumulative pounds/acre of each heavy metal, annual pounds/acre of plant
available nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied
to each field.
0

3. A representative annual soils analysis shall be conducted of each site receiving
sludge in the respective calendar year and the results maintained on file by the
Permittee for a minimum of five years. The soils analysis shall include but is not
necessarily limited to the following parameters:
Standard Soil Fertility Test Manganese
% Base Saturation
Cation Exchange Capacity
Phosphorus
Sodium
Potassium
Nickel
Lead
Cadmium
Zinc
Copper
Magnesium
Calcium
pH
4. A complete sludge analysis and EP Toxicity analysis shall be conducted by the
Permittee quarterly and annually, respectively and the results maintained on file by
the Permittee for a minimum of five years. If land application occurs at a frequency
less than quarterly, sludge analysis will be required for each instance of land
application. The sludge analysis shall include but is not necessarily limited to the
following parameters:
% total solids
Magnesium
Total Nitrogen
Sulfate
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cadmium
Chromium
Sodium
Calcium
Chlorides
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
pH
The EP Toxicity analysis shall include the following parameters:
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Endrin
Lindane
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
2,4-D
2,4,5 -TP Silvex
5. Two copies of all monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in conditions
III 1, III 2, III 3 and III 4 shall be submitted annually on or before January 31 of
the following year to the following address:
NC Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
5

6. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville, Regional Office
telephone no. 704/ 663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application program which results in the
land application of significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in
quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a discharge of
wastes to receiving waters.
c. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has
gone out of compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit
or the parameters on which the system was designed.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render
the facility incapable of adequate sludge treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting
sludge to the application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in
letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem
does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. Any groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the Division of
. Environmental Management shall be provided.
2. No land application of waste activities shall be undertaken when the seasonal high
water table is less than three feet below land surface.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the sludge storage, transport, and
disposal facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and
discharges which may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a
threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall keep an inspection log
or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations made,
and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This
log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of three years
from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request by the
Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
0

2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the disposal site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may- obtain .samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the land application activities are carried
out in accordance with the conditions of this permit and in the manner approved
by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to
change ownership or a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must
be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an
application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting
materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered
on its merits and may or may not be approved.
4. Prior to any transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
5. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreements between the Permittee
and the landowners/lessees are in full force and effect.
6. The following are approved sites and crops for sludge application (see attached
map):
Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area (excluding buffers)
acres
1 John P. Beam, Sr.
12
2 John P. Beam, Sr.
10
3 John P. Beam, Sr.
12.7
4 John P. Beam, Sr.
28
5 John P. Beam, Sr.
12
6 John P. Beam, Sr.
17
7 John P. Beam, Sr.
26
8 John P. Beam, Sr.
20
9 John P. Beam, Sr.
13..55
TOTAL 151.2
7. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental
Management in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
7

8. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within
thirty (30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee
accordingly may cause the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as
specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
9. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
10. A set of approved documents for the subject project must be retained by the applicant
for the life of the project.
11. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall
request its extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review
the adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the
permit for such period of time and under such conditions and limitations as it may
deem appropriate.
12. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions,
limitations and monitoring requirements the Division of Environmental Management
deems necessary in order to adequately protect the environment and public health.
13. Land application activities conducted under this permit are limited to the land
application of 666,667 gallons per year or 145 dry tons per year until the permit is
amended to include additional lands.
14. Issuance of this permit hereby amends Permit No.WQ0000430 issued December 12,
1988.
Permit issued this the 9th day of March, 1990
NORTH CAROLINA
George T. Everett,
Division of Environ
By Authority of the
Permit No. WQ0000430
AL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Management Commission

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PERMIT-ATTAC INMNT A
This information will be used by the Division to determine whether a waste is (1) hazardous
as defined by 10 NCAC 10F, and (2) suitable for disposal at a waste management facility permitted
by the Division of Environmental Management.
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources reserves the right to request
additional information or waive some of the requirements based on the type of waste if it deems
necessary. The Department may also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render the
wastes environmentally immobile prior to disposal.
The following information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete forms ,%zll subject the
Non -discharge permit application to being returned as incomplete.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. What is the waste:
Municipal pal wastewater = 1 ant- g1 iirJgP
2. What volume, on an annual basis, is generated by the source (gallons & percent solids or dry
tons per year
1 - 1 5 MG - 'cif Dry Tong
3. What frequency of disposal or land application will there be (daily, monthly, quarterly, etc.):
annual
How much sludge storage capacity does the treatment facility contain (in days):
365 days
4. For industrial residuals, please explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste
was generated (Please provide full and complete details of the entire process):
municipal
5. What process is utilized for stabilization of the residuals? All residuals must be stabilized by
a process to significantly reduce pathogens (as described. in 40 CFR Part 257, Appendix H)
prior to application or incorporation.
n>>r t-reatmPnt rnr-Pcc is the oxX datj on ditch with two
clarifiers and -an aerated sludge holding tank_ nur waste
sludge goes to the holding tank and remains there approximately
16 to 18 days. During this time, it is decanted repeatedly.
From the holding tank, the sludge goes to the sludge storage
lagoon where it is accumulated for approximately one year then is
land epplied. i
1

6. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust emissions which may cause a health
hazard or nuisance to surrounding persons?
no,
7. Specify how the waste will be delivered to the disposal site (in leak proof trucks to a
terragator, etc.) and what type of equipment will be utilized for disposal:
Delivered by leakproof truck to the site.
Ea ipment - trucks, terragator, mixers. pumps _
8. Do you intend to utilize a contractor who specializes in Residual Management or do you
intend to manage the program. If a contractor is utilized, please provide the name of the
firm, a contact, address, and telephone number.
we wi 1 1 11se a contractor - Ent i-r-onmentaI Waste Disposal-, Inc
Grace Draman
P_ O. Box 170
Advance, NC 27006 919-998-8384
B. INFORMATION FOR HAZARDOUS (RCRA) DETERMINATION (10 NCAC 10F .0029)
Is the waste listed under .0029(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31-261.33): If yes, list the number:
no - please see attached analysis
2. Does the waste exhibit any of the four characteristics as defined by .0029(d) (i.e., 40 CFR
261.21-261.24): Attach laboratory results for EP Toxicity, Reactivity, Ignitability,
Corrosivity):
no
C. INFORMATION FOR LAND APPLICATION DETERMINATION
Note: The following are established maximum leachable (EP Toxicity) contamination levels
and pH established for land application. Chemical analyses should be made at Minimum
Detection Limits permitting assessment below the maximum levels. (The pH range shown is
for individual data points. The average values accepted are normally 4.0-10.0).
METALS:
(ppm)
PESTICIDES/IERBICIDES: (ppm)
Arsenic
5.0
Lindane
0.40
Barium
100.0
Endrin
0.02
Cadmium
1.0
Methoxychlor
10.0
Chromium
5.0
Toxaphene
0.50
Lead
5.0
2, 4-D
10.0
Mercury
0.2
2,4,5-TP Silvex
1.00
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
pH (2:1 vol/wt.)
>2.0-<12.5 s.u.
1. Attach E.P. Toxicity results; sampling should be in accordance with standard procedures (10
NCAC 10F .0029; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Wastes -Part 261.20 et.al.). Are
any of the above parameters' concentration limitations exceeded? nn
2. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in .0029(e), Appendix VIII
(i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII): If yes, what constituents and what concentration (Attach
laboratory results):
no
E

i
"I hereby certify that the information submitted in regard to l L-r P v v_ i /e �rRwf�s �7`O�g� r Sl uA �1-
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
14 5 7P (Print name)
Din E c7 R d aI4 Ts (title)
,,d2l, ` �,5 . Z o (date)
All questions concerning this form should be directed to the Division of Environmental
Management, Permits and Engineering Unit at 919/733-5083. Answer specific questions in space
provided. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Complete all information, sign, and submit with the land application permit package:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
i
3

REPORT NUMBER
R97-41A A D• L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 804-743-9401
SEND ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL INC
TO: P O BOX 170 CUSTOMER: CHERRYVILLE NC
ADVANCE, NC 27006
DATEOFREPORT 4/3/90 PAGE 1 SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
RECEIVED APR - 5 1990
( AtL
ED@
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY: EWD INC
SAMPLE
INDENT.
Lab
No.
Solids
%
Nitrogen
%14
Phos.
phortrs
14,
Polas
siurn
%K
Sullur
°i'S
Calcium
Ca
Mag
nesium
% Mg.
Sodium
qti Na
Iron
PPm Fe
Aluminum
ppm Al
Mangy
nese
ppm Mn
Copper
ppm Cu
Zinc
ppm Zr)
Ammonia
Nitogen
Nitrate
Ndrogen
ppm
Cherry-
ville,NC
3/26
31541
0.84
8.33
1.83
0.23
1.86
0.92
0.29
0.54
18900
21200
173
440
320
0.71
245
LAB
NO.
Cadmium
PP m Cd
Chro
mtum
ppm Cr
Nickel
Pp m Ni
Lead
PP rn Pb,m
Arsenic
P{ As
Mercury
m fig
Pp 9
Selenium
m Se
ppm
1` !'''
.
I H
i P
Calcium
Carbonate
Eq. %
Volatile
Solids
I
%
Organic
Nitrogen
%
Molyb-
denum
ppm Mo
C1
PP m
TOC
%
31541
3.5
30
15
45
5.65
0.53
1.70
6.6
NA
75.90
7.62
38
8000
39.13
EP Toxicit
to fo
low.
* Argentom
tric.
All values except °6 Solids are on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mg/I Ippml multiply by 10.000.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients. and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
This report applies only to the samplelsl tested. Samples are
retained a maximum of thirty days after testing.
itten authorization.
to the work. the results. or the company in any advertising. news release. or other public an riot wim2w
A Et L RIC TURAL LAB TORIES, INC.
Pahl 1714 _ Chi Ph n
By�� ��
r ntnunnnnt _-FnMLCz Al

A £t L ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT NUMBER
7621 WHITE PINE ROAD • RICHMOND, VA 23237 • [phone] R97-41A
L A Division of A >* LAgriculturai Laboratories, Inc. Addition
Samples ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL INC Project: CHERRYVILLE NC
Submitted P 0 BOX 170 Date Reed:
Bv: Date Reported: 4/5/90
Attention: ADVANCE NC 27006 Date Sampled:
WATER £t WASTEWATER REPORT OF ANALYSIS �nefl
Test
DATE
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
Cherryvi l l e,
NC
Laboratory No.
31541
Alkalinity - Totai
Alkal inity-Bicarbonate
Al kal i nity-Carbonate
Aluminum
Arsenic
0.001
Barium
< 1
BOD (5 Days)
Boron
Cadmium
0.01
Calcium
Chlorides
Chromium (Total)
COD
Coliform
Conductivity (mmhosicm)
Copper
Hardness (Total)
Iron
Lead
0.1-
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
< 0.001
Nitrogen (Total Kieldahl)
Nitrogen (Ammonia)
i
Nitrate as N
Nitrite as N
Nitrate Ft Nitrite as N
pH (Standard Units)
Phosphorus (Total)
Phosphorus(ortho)
Potassiu m
Selenium
< 0.001
Sodium
Sodium Adsorption Ratio SA
Sulfate as SO 4
Total Dissolved Solids
Zinc
Silver
0.1
Values are obtained
by using E.
P. Toxicitv
Drocedures.
I
3mments:
N=Ul- i o uv mg/ l UNLt55 S TAl-ED OTFy�ISE.
5
rau I G.H. Gnu, -Fff —.T.—
A £t L AGRICULTURAL
�LyA TORIES INC.
Bv: c m/�4 "�L1 \— 60,

IEPORT NUMBER
F099-15A A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, IPJC.
1CCOUNT NUMBER
00020 i(i20 3505 Conestoga Drive • Fort Wayne, Indiana 4b808-4413 • Phone [phone]
R97-41A ADDITION
• • 04/23/90
SEND
t TO:
A b L Eastern Agric Lake
7621 Wry i tep i ne Road
Richmond VA 23237
�arrnple ID:
_ab .(dumber :
:31541
001486
Lindane
Erndi
S zI'i
Dicamba (Banvel)
2 4-D
/d�, 54-TB fSi'l 'L
..0
31540/31645 ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISPOSAL, INC
P 0 BOX 170
ADVANCE NC 27006
QA 9004060- 90040E-04 GROWER: CHERRYVILLE, NC
CODE:
REPORT OF ANAOYSIS
PESTICIDE Date: 04/19/90 page:
t.
!� None detected at or above the limits of the present. methodology.
J

Agricultural Utilization - Land Application
Citv of Cherrvville. NC
Table 1
E. P. Toxicity
Parameter Cherryville, NC
Arsenic
<
0.001
Barium
<
1.0
Cadmium
<
0.01
Chromium
<
0.1
Lead
<
0.1
Mercury
<
0.001
Selenium
<
0.001
Silver
<
0.1
Endrin
<
0.250
Lindane
<
0.002
Methoxychlor
<
0.50
Toxaphene
<
2.0
2, 4-D
<
2.0
2, 4, 5-TP Silvex
<
1.0
PH 6.6
Acceptable
RCRA - E. P. Toxicit
5.0
mg/l
100.0
mg/l
1.0
mg/l
5.0
mg/l
5.0
mg/l
0.2
mg/l
1.0
mg/1
5.0
mg/l
20.0
ug/1
400.0
ug/l
10,000.0
ug/l
500.0
ug/l
10,000.0
ug/l
1,000.0
ug/l
7

oo,g
rn rn 8 o cn c'pi+ c~i+ o w 25 25 o 0 0 o N o oo de a
88o�to 8888888888 wa ���Lo No w
i- F~ k 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
+ + II II II II II II II II II II II
N I
NN W pppp p, t
O~0 N 1-4
Z 4G
co
U 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
r• an w
k k k k k k k k k k k k >C k >C k k k k k >C k k
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
II II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II II II II
W d~1 O O I? I?O O O O O CD
N J O 1-4
(T1 00 O O O Oo W N O �A O (Jl OD +] �A Ol Oi k`
8 g S g G 8 8 o 8 0 I 0 8 8 o c t o g g 8

Agricultural Utilization - Land Application
Cherryville, North Carolina - Surface Application
Proposed Application Rate
20,000 gal/Ac/yr or approximately 3 Dry Tons/Ac/yr
The % solids of liquid sludges tend to vary upon WWTP operations. Liquid
applications will be governed so as not to exceed the hydraulic capacity of
the receiver sites per application event.
EPA Lifetime
lbs./acre
Allowable Limit
Site Life
Parameter
applied
lbs./acre
3 yr. rotation
Plant Available
Nitrogen
114
Phosphorus
110
Potassium
14
Sulfur
103
Calcium
55
Magnesium
17
Sodium
33
Calcium Carbonate
N/A
Iron
113
Aluminum
127
Manganese
1.04
Copper
2.64
125*
142
Zinc
1.92
250*
391
Cadmium
0.021
4.5*
643
Chromium
0.18
Nickel
0.09
125*
4167
Lead
0.27
500*
5556
Arsenic
0.034
Mercury
0.003
Selenium
0.01
Molybdenum
0.228
Chlorides
N/A
* The allowable lbs./acre is a lifetime loading limit based upon
soil CEC range of 0 to 5.

Agricultural Utilization - Land Application
Cherryville, North Carolina - Subsurface Application
Proposed Application Rate
20,000 gal/Ac/yr or approximately 3 Dry Tons/Ac/yr
The % solids of liquid sludges tend to vary upon WWTP operations. Liquid
applications will be governed so as not to exceed the hydraulic capacity
of the receiver sites per application event.
EPA Lifetime
lbs./acre
Allowable Limit
Site Life
Parameter
applied
lbs./acre
3 yr. rotation
Plant Available
Nitrogen
136
Phosphorus
110
Potassium
14
Sulfur
103
Calcium
55
Magnesium
17
Sodium
33
Calcium Carbonate
N/A
Iron
113
Aluminum
127
Manganese
1.04
Copper
2.64
125*
142
zinc
1.92
250*
391
Cadmium
0.021
4.5*
643
Chromium
0.18
Nickel
0.09
125*
4167
Lead
0.27
500*
5556
Arsenic
0.034
Mercury
0.003
Selenium
0.01
Molybdenum
0.228
Chlorides
N/A
* The allowable lbs./acre is a lifetime loading limit based upon
soil CEC range of 0 to 5.
10

AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION EVALUATION
Site Evaluation Sheet
Countv: Lincoln
Owner: Stowe Leonhardt
Operator: John P. Beam, Sr.
Address: Rt. 4, Box 473
Cherryville, NC 28021
Phone: [phone]
Predominate Soil Series: Cecil, Pacolet
Predominate Soil Texture: sandv clav
Depth to Water Table: >6 ft.
Slope: 2-10%
Crops:
corn, small grain
Est. Applicable
Field
Total Acres
Acres
Crops
11
30.2
24.0
corn
12
19.4
16.0
corn
13
16.8
14.0
corn
14 10.6 10.0 corn
15 15.6 12.0 corn
16 4.9 3.5 corn
Total 97.5 79.5
Comments:No evidence of seasonal high water table or bedrock within
three vertical feet of the deepest Doint of sludue aDDlication.
�I
1

P.
o
10
C A T
A W
B A
-�
.77
tfy•
lion 117Z LLLL v ITO@- 6 im
1�
�i�
_
0 17CS
_
I71I� 1 li -
.0
�1�
Y V •7
III r w 11
210 /'
``17I7 9
}
�Pi
s
'o 71g.IT� tto� L
t.7 JmM a
1
171e
I/11
m
•� ll 2 1112
',bt 177
1� 1 �
Ma2L1
l.U2
lama
CO15o0on .7
Inv
J
� _'•�• 1476
_
X
1.0
1LiZ } �•�
1
v-
LA Der. v
it• wo
U41
a
yN
w
} �
t t
lfs .a 11A
Ila
a
7
7 h J t
7 � a �
1
"'►
Ib
114
LA
lei
LL14 s 11-4
ilN
\9
�
ILMQ1
\_ •i ]1�
Lua
1.111 > lui.s
e\
1A
w
.a
` .\ b
Q
.�
pq,
11�0
.
1142
S �
T
t
te
UAL
w
IL
y lin
„K
um 1
'
ILM
13naL Y 71�
1.0
1�1
rp•4 f `\7
M tl
LL
182
V Sffs �
y
J
Lt�b
o
v
Lb
mpg,
r 150
LOCATION MAP
Stowe Leonhardt
2

STOWE LEONHARDT
Location: Hwy. 182
Field #11: North - needs a buffer zone along Hwy. 182.
East - needs a buffer zone along SR #1167.
.South - needs buffer zone along adjoining property
line.
West - needs buffer zone along property line and
along SR #1166.
Field #12: Needs a buffer zone along west side and at northwest
corner along Hwy. 182 and adjoining garden area.
All other sides adjoin permitted property or pasture
land owned by applicant.
Field #13: North - needs buffer zone along adjoining property
line.
West - needs buffer zone along adjoining property
line.
South - needs buffer zone along Hwy. 182.
East - needs no buffer zone.
Field #14: North - needs buffer zone along adjoining property
line.
South - needs buffer zone along Hwy. 182.
East/West - needs no buffer zone.
Field #15: North - needs buffer zone along adjoining property
line.
South - needs buffer zone along Hwy. 182.
East/West - needs no buffer zone.
Field #16: Needs only one buffer zone along southern border along
SR #182.
ki

t

-41
-Nf Utz
m

FIELD ANALYSIS
DEPTH
TEXTURE
COLOR
5TRUCTU2E.
DEPTH -ro
wATE:C -aa tE
cEC
SLOPE
u Icy �-
- FJ
GIGS
Re ol
SLLbQ
e C
Cndy
�cl
,�u,sl c�1,7 `cIQr
r
d y
��d
r
C 19
YP t '
6 (Or
317
�/���jcr; u /�
0 �/f 6
.j�/I�
f
C Ir��
.
LAN DOW.IJE R- __ 1 o cv r. L c o o A G rd � LESS E� ���► h rq c* m
LOCRT_IO N �-�-' ti % F 2-
FIELD W41rn4ER .� � 1,2 , 1 l �� DATE " f 1 c�� ANALYSIS
QRf.DominCITE, SOIL. SERIES CeC

liorO Caroliva DiDisiou of
CuDirounteutal Aa ua g meut
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: Town of h ryyi 1 le _ NC
Contact Person: Ralph Chi 1 ders
Address of Permittee: 116 R _ . Mmintai n St _
Cherryville, NC 28021
List of Sludges to be applied to these lands: Cherrvvi 11 e.. NC
Site ID Number:
Field Number: 1(0
Location of Land to be used for sludge disposal (include map for each site):
Hwy 1R7
Owner of Property used for sludge disposal: Stowe T.eonhardt
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): Tnhn P _ . Ream _ F; _
Land use or cropping patterns: i-nrn - gma 1 1 grains
Intended use or disposition of crops: i i x7A-,tnr-k fPPd
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
Town of Cherryville, NC
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges upon the land at the
location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given
below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient
value of the applied sludge while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land
described above for the disposal of digested sludge. This agreement shall remain in effect for the
length of the Division of. Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed
each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his
representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until
such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies or cancels this

Pg. 2 SLUDGE APPLICATION AGREEMENT
(Continued)
STIPULATIONS•
1. The land owner or his representative hereby authorize the Permittee,
County and State officials or their representatives to inspect each
parcel of property prior to, during, and after sludge application and
to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as
required by the sludge disposal permit.
2. The land owner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County
and State officials or their representatives to take necessary soil,.
surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12)
months after termination of this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each land owner or his representative with a
copy of the land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development (NCDNRCD) Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of sludge application. The NCDNRCD-DEM permit will
delineate maximum application rates, limitations and other restric-
tions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the land owner or his representative with
information and data concerning the program for land application of
sludge to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of con-
stituents of the -sludge, sludge application methods and schedules for
typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by
the Permittee for sludge application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each land owner or his representative with a
copy of laboratory analysis stating constituents of the sludge prior
to the commencement of each sludge application.
6. The Permittee will furnish each land owner or his representatives with a
copy of the results of each soil analysis.
7. The Permittee will supply and apply lime as specified through
contract with EWD, Inc.
10

Pg. 3 SLUDGE APPLICATION AGREEMENT
(Continued)
STIPULATIONS:
8. The land owner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any
revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns
shown above at least twelve (12) months prior to each planting season
to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDNRCD
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will deter-
mine sludge application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and
the results of soil samples.
9. No crops for human consumption shall be raised on the land for a
period of twelve months after sludge application.
10. The land owner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the
provisions of the Agreement for a period of twelve (12) months from
the date of the most recent sludge application.
11. The Permittee will exercise all reasonable care and precautions in the
execution of this Agreement. The Permittee will not be held liable for
any damage to the property or persons in the execution of this
Agreement not due directly to negligence on behalf of the Permittee.
12. Should the land owner or his representative lease otherwise permit the
use of the land by a third party the land owner shall be responsible to
insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this
Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. In consideration of the signing of this Agreement, the parties thereto
for themselves, their agents, officials, employees and servants agree
not to discriminate in any manner on the basis of race, color, creed or
national origin with reference to the subject matter of this Agree-
ment, no matter how remote.
15. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and
assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of
this Agreement.
11

Pg. 4 SLUDGE APPLICATION AGREEMENT
(Continued)
16. The land application disposal sites shall not be grazed within thirty
(30) days after the last sludge application by any animals whose pro-
ducts (including their meat) is consumed by humans.
17. In any future transfer of the land where sludge has been applied,
notice shall be given to the new land owner that gives full details
to the sludge constituents, volume, etc., that was applied or
incorporated at this site.
RESTRICTIONS:
Land Owner and/or Lessee
Date
C t', on Ci^ errvv li e , "C
Permittee
NORTH CAROLINA
•••, '�� •N..y CIS '•�i
Cn this dal-, anuar-;. ,,
o'rn 'F. Bea. and Store Leon-"--ardt IOTA%.
per] s document
y 'l♦_a //�� ^ c. _
V ���i l..`1 t�11 S C;oC UI.l e11V ?1�: il�.• JrE�i E11C e.
/ tea:' `�Cn i" i7C`� • .,•.
toy Commission Expire
12

SOILS INFORMATION
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION - LAND APPLICATION
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc. (EWD) has identified an
additional 97.5 acres for the Cherryville Agricultural Utilization
program. An estimated 79.5 acres are applicable for sludge
application. The applicable acres were determined by eliminating
all buffer zones required by The North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources. All other areas with
restrictive features were ruled unacceptable and excluded from the
determination of applicable acres.
The predominate soil types encountered on the proposed application
sites were the Cecil and Pacolet series. These soil series are excellent
candidates for sludge application because they are deep, well drained
soils suitable for many agricultural uses. Both Cecil and Pacolet
are currently permitted as sludge receiver sites in similar land
application programs.
The seasonally high water tables for all of these soil types are
below six (6) feet. Descriptions for each series published by the
Soil Conservation Service are included in this section.
The descriptions contain the representative profiles of the
soil series found on the proposed sites. The auger borings
advanced on the sites were typical of these series and varied
only slightly in the depth of the horizons. The approximate
location of the auger borings are indicated on the site maps
with X's.
Given the naturally low fertility of these soil types the
proposed application of sludge will provide beneficial nutrients and
soil amending properties for these lands.
Greg Mackin
Technical Services
11

SOIL IDENTIFICATION LEGEND
LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 1988
Map
Interp.
Map Unit Name
Symbol
Symbol
1
RvA
Riverview loam, O.to 2 percent slopes,
occasionally flooded
2B
(3B)
PmB
Pacolet-Madison-Urban land complex, 2 to 8
percent slopes
2D
(3D)
PmC
Pacolet-Madison-Urban land complex, 8 to 15
percent slopes
4
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, .
frequently flooded
6
Ur
Urban land
23B2
(23B)
GnB2
Gaston sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, eroded
23D2
(23D)
GnC2
Gaston sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes, eroded
23E
GaD
Gaston loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
31B2
(31B,
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to,8 percent slopes,
25B)
eroded
32B2
PeB2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, eroded
32D2
(31D,
PeC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes;
32D,25D)
eroded
32E
PaD
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
32F
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
33B
CcB
Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
34B
PaB -
Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
34D
PaC
Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
35B
RnB
Rion sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
36B
(57B)
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
36D
RnC
Rion sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
0.

LINCOLN COUNTY LEGEND
Page 2
Map Interp.
symbol Symbol
37B2 (37B) MdB2
37D2 (37D) MdC2
37E (37F)
48B (46B)
48D (46D)
48E (48F)
49B2
MaD
GrB
GrC
GrD
GvB 2
49D2 GvC2
50B (63B) WnB
51B SeB
59B (41B, HeB
9B)
63F
70
80
540B
540D
544A
Qu
Uo
Map Unit Name
Madison sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
eroded
Madison sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
eroded
Madison sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Georgeville loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Georgeville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Georgeville loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Georgeville clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
.eroded
Georgeville clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
eroded
Winnsboro fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Helena sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
ZmE Zion-Mocksville complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes
BnB Buncombe sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded
WoA Worsham fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
MsB Masada sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MsC Masada sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
AaA Altavista sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
rarely flooded
Pt Pits, quarries
Ud Udorthents, loamy
3

NC0018 SO I L I NTERPRET'AT I OHS RECORD
MLRA(S)I 136, 748 CECIL SERIES
REV. RAG,ENH, 7-87
TYPIC HAPLUDULTS, CLAYEY, KAOLINITIC, THERMIC
THE CECIL SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED NEARLY LEVEL TO STEEP SOILS ON PIEDMONT UPLANDS, TYPICALLY THESE SOILS HAVE A
SANDY LOAN SURFACE LAYER ABOUT 7 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL 15 DOMINANTLY RED CLAY AND CLAY LOAN 43 INCHES THICK. THE
UNDERLYING MATERIAL IS MULTICOLORED, LOAMY SAPROLITE OF FELSId-M17SALLINE RO-a-771LEMSE RANGE FROM 0 TO 2S PERCENT.
I
- -
IDIPIHI
1(IN.)I USDA TEXTURE
1
I
1 UNIFIED
1 AASHTO
iAL11FMCEN1 OF LE5 I
1 3 INI THAN 3- PASSING SIEVE N0. 1 LIMIT ITICITYI
I
1 -
I
-
I
- -
I PCT 1 1 IINDEX I
1 0-7 IGR-SL, GR-L, GR-FSL
1 0-7 ISCL, CL
ISM, CH
ISM, SC, CL,
.
IA-2, A-1-6
1
15-15160-9S 55-85 40-75 13-30 1 22 INP-4 I
1 7-111SCL, CL
ML
ISM, SC, ML, CL
IA-i, A-6
IA-4, A-6
1 0-5 175-100 75-100 68-95 38-81 1 21-35 1 3-15 1
1 0-5 175-100 75-100 68-95 38-81 1 21-35 1 3-1S 1
III—SOIC, CL
150-751VAR
INN, ML
I
IA-7, A-5
I
1 0-5 197-100 92-100 72-99 55-95 1 41-60 1 9-37 1
1 I I I I
I I
I(IN.)1(PCT)1 DENSITY I BILITY IWATER CAPACITY IREACT IONI(M1R105/CM)1 SWELL I FACTORS I EROO. I MATTER I
I 1 1 (G/0431 1 (IN/HRI I 11u/tu1
I roue I�nnrr.r.....�s-r-.......
._�. )
1 0-7 1 5-2011.40-1.60 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.07-0.09
14.5-6.0 1 - I
.J-c IMUMAIM"JULKAlt1
LOW 1.151 ♦ 1 - 1 1
1 0-7 120-3511.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15
14.5-6.0 1 — 1
.5-2
LDW 1.281 3 1 - 1 1
1 7-11120-3511.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15
14.5-5.5 1 - I
.5-1
LOW 1.281
111-50135-7011.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15
14.5-S.S 1 - 1
LOW 1.281
ISO-751 I I 1
I FLOOD I HIGH WATER
I I I
]ABLE
I 1
i
I' FREQUENCY I DURATION IHS 1 FT I
1
I CEMaTto
I ION I
PAN I FlEmw II
Ii2Pit FROST 1
1 IN I I IH I IH I 1 ACTION 1
-
I
SANITARY FACILITIES 8
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL B
1 — s -
ISEPTIC TANK 1 8-15t: MODERATE-PERCS'SLOWLY,SIAPE
I ABSORPTION I IS+%: SEVERE
11
s I
1 15-25%t FAIR —LOW STRENGTH,SLOPE I
-SLOPE
I FIELDS I
II ROADFILL
II
I !
I 1
! I
I
If
I 1
1 SEWAGE 1 2-7%t MODERATE-SEEPACE,SLAPE
II
IMPROBABLE—EXCESS1
I
I LAGOON 1 7+ts SEVERE —SLOPE
II SAID
1
1
1 AREAS I
II
I
I
I t
II
I
t 1
I
I SANITARY 18-15%t MODERATE—SLOPE,TOO CLAYEY
If
1
I
! LANDFILL 115+rt SEVERE —SLOPE
II GRAVEL,
1
I
I (TRENCH) 1
II
1
I
I I
II
1
1 _
1 1
1 SANITARY 1 8-15ts MODERATE —SLOPE
I LANDFILL 1 15+%: SEVERE —SLOPE
11
11 TOPSOIL
= I
1 15+%s POOR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE 1
I (AREA) I
Ir
I i
!
1 1
11
r
II U—d%g FAIR-TOO—CLAYF—Y,HARD TOF PACK it
I DAILY 1 8-15%t FAIR —TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE,HARD TO
1 COVER FOR 115+%t POOR —SLOPE
PACK It
11
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
T 0-3%MWS
ILANDFILL 1
I 1
11 POND
i
1 3-6%t MODERATE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE I
11 RESERVOIR
18+Nt SEVERE —SLOPE I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOp;W 8
11 AREA
11
I 1
1 I
I - t —
I SHALLOW 18-15%t MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
s I
IIEMBANKMENTS I
(EXCAVATIONS I IS+tt SEVERE —SLOPE
11 DIKES AND
1
I 1
I 1
11 LEVEES
I 1
1 - t SLI
I DWELL INO 1 8-15%s MODERATE —SLOPE
II
11 EXCAVATED
I I
1
I
I WITHOUT 115+%t SEVERE -SLOPE
!1 PONDS
1
1
BASEMENTS i
IIAGUIFER FED
I
i
II
1
I I
I s
1 DWELL IMGB 18-15%t MODERATE -SLOPE
II
1
i
1 WITH 115+%s SEVERE —SLOPE
It DRAINAGE
1
1
I BASEMENTS 1
11
1
1 1
11
1
r 1
I — t SL
1 SMALL 14-8ts NOOEBATE-SLOPE
11
1 _ t I
13+7r SLOPE
I COMMERCIAL 1 8+%t SEVERE —SLOPE
II
11 IRRIGATION
1
1
1 BUILDINGS 1
11
I'
1
I !
1
1 LOCAL 18-15%t MODERATE-SLAPE,LOW STRENGTH
II T LCES
FAWURABLE
s I
8Ht SLOPE
I ROADS AND 1 15+%t SEVERE —SLOPE
11 AND
I
i
1 STREETS 1
11 DIVERSIONS
i I
ILANDSCAPINIG 1 0-", FAVORABLE-
8-15% SL,FSL,L,SCL,CL: MODERATE —SLOPE II GRASSED I ml SLOPE 1
I AND GOLF 1 0-6% GRs MODERATE —SMALL STONES 11 WATERWAYS 1 I
1 FAIRWAYS 1 8-15% GRt MODERATE —SMALL STONES,SLOPE 11 ! 1
I 11S+%: SEVERE—SLOPERLGjONAMRTEWHhlAIIONS
11 I t
l
I
I

CECIL SERIES
H00018
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 8
-
! 1 8-15% SL,FSL,L,SCL,CL: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
- l
1 2-6% SL,FSL,L,SCL,CL: MODERATE-lbOPf 1
I CAMP AREAS 115+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
::PLAYGROUNDS 16+% SL,FSL,L,SCL,CL: SEVERE-SLQPE 1
1 I 0-8\ CR: MODERATE -SMALL STONES
II
1 0-6% GR: SEVERE -SMALL STONES I
I 18-1St CR: H00l7UITE-SMALL STONES SLOPE
11
1 6+% GRs SEVERE -SLOPE SMALL STONES I
I -
I 18-15% SL,FSL,L,SCL,CL: MODERATE -SLOPE
II
- : I
PATHS 115-25%s MODERATE -SLOPE I
,PICNIC AREAS: 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11
AND 1 I
I 1 0-6% GR: MODERATE -SMALL STONES
It
TRAILS I I
1 15-15% GR: MODERATE -SMALL STONES SLOPE
11
1 I
1— CLA55 - COTTON
I DETERMINING 181LITY I I LINT
I
I
OATS—T3 C —i�Ab l U I
I I IL.EGUME HAY I 1
1 PHASE I I BU 1 L85
1 I
1
BU I BU) I Less I TOMS I AUM I
I
16-10% SL,FSL,L,CR 1 3E 1 1 90 1 1 700,1
1 85
I
1 130 1 12000 1 1 3.1 V 1 7.5 1 1
110-15% SL,FSL,L,GR I tiE I 1 80 1 1 600 1
1 75
1 1 25 1 11900 1 1 2.8 1 1 7.0 1 1
115-ZS% SL,FSL,L,CR 16E 1 1 70 1 1 500 1
1 60
1 1 20 1 11800 1 1 2.6 1 1 5.5 1 1
12-6% SCL,CL,ERODED 13E 1 1 70 1 1 SOO 1
1 70
1 1 25 I 1- 1 1 2.4 1 1 5.5 1 1
16-10% SCL,CL,ERODED 14E 1 160 1 1- 1
1 60
1 1- 1 1- 1 1 2.I 1 1 5.0 I 1
110-ZS% SCL.CL,ERODED 1 6E I 1- I I- 1
1-
I 1- 1 1- 1 1 1.8 1' 1 4.5 1 1
! 1 1 I I I I
I I I I 1 1 I
1
I
I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1
t I 1 I
1 1 I I 1 I 1
i t I I I I I
I
1
I i I 1 I r
t I I I I I 1 I 1 I
I I i I 1 I 1 I t 1
1 -
I DETERMINING
IORDI MWGEMENf PROBLEILS I POMMI IAL PRODWI I VI I Y
ISYNI
I I
1 TREES TO PLANT i
1 PHASE
I IHAIARDILIHIT IMORT'YIHIA7AROICOHPETI IINDXICLASI 1
I-
11S-25% SL,FSL,L,CR
1 BRIHODER.IMOOER.ISLICHTISLICHTIMOOER.ISHORTLEAF PINE 169 *1 8
I
ISLASH PINE I
I
1 1 I I 1 1 IVIRCINIA PINE 173 *1 8
IYELLOW POPLAR I
!
I 1 I I 1 1 1BLACK OAK 167 1 3
1 1
I I I ,NORTHERN RED OAK 182 *1 4
1 I
1
1 I I 1 1 1 (POST OAK 165 1 3
1 1
I
I 1 I 1 1 I ISCARLET OAK 165 1 3
1 I
!
1 I 1 1 I 1 IYELLOW POPLAR 192 *1 6
1 1
10-15% SCL,CL,ERODEO
17CISLIGHTIHODER.IMODER.ISLICRTISLICHTILOBLOLLY PINE 172 1 7
IL0BLOLLY PINE 1
115-2S% SCL,CL,ERODED
17RINODER.ISEVEREIHODER.ISLIGMISLIGHTISHORTLEAF PINE 166 l 7
ISLASH PINE 1
!
I I I I 1 I IVIRGINIA PINE I65 *1 7
1 1
11
1 I I 1 I 18LACK OAK 1- i-
I 1
I
I 1 1 1 t 1 ,NORTHERN RED OAK 1- I-
1 i
!
1 1 1 1 I I (POST OAK 1- 1-
1 1
!
1 I I I 1 I ISCARLET OAK I- I-
1
1WINDBREAKS
1 -
1
1
I
1
I I I 1 1 I
! 1 1 I I I
l
I I i
r I t
I
I I I 1 I I
I 1 i
I I I 1 I I
I I
WILDLIFE HABIIAIF SUITABILITY (D)
I
1 DETERMINING
l
I
I PHASE
I SEED IL.EGUJFE I HERB. I TREES IPLANTS 1 IPIANTS I WATER IWILDLF
IVILDLF IWIIDL.F IVILDLF 1
t
I6-15% SL,FSL,L,CB
-
1 FAIR 1 0000 -L GO0D I GOOD I GOOD 1 - IV. POORIV. POORI GOOD
- 1
I GO00' IV. POORI -' 1'
115-25% SL,FSL,L,CR
I POOR 1 FAIR 1 GOOD 1' GO00 1 GOOD I - IV. POORtY. POOR, FAIR
1 GOOD IV. POOR, - 1
10-6% SCL,CL,ERODED
1 FAIR I GOOD I WOO I GDOD 1 GOOD 1 - IV. POORIY. P0oI1 G000
I GDOO IV. POOR, - 1
16-15% SCL,CL,ERODED
i POOR' 1 FAIR I FAIR 1 FAIR i FAIR I - I.V. POORIV. POORI FAIR
I FAIR IV. POORI - I
115-25% SCI. CL ERODED
IV. POORI POOR I FAIR 1 FAIR 1 FAIR 1 - IV. POORIV. POORI POOR
I FAIR IV_ POORI - I
COMMON PLANT MANE
IFLOtMERING DOGWOOD I COFL2 1 I I 1 I 1
IAMERICAN HOLLY I ,LOP 1 1 I 1 1 I
IPAWPAW I ASTR 1 1 I 1 1 !
IFARKLEBERRY I VAAR 1 1 t 1 I 1
INUSCADINE GRAPE 1 VIR03 I I 1 I I 1
ISIMAC 1 RHUS♦ 1 1 I 1 1 1
IREDPURPL.E BEEBALM I NORU 1 I I I 1 1
IMACKBERRY I RUBUS I 1 1 I 1 1
IPERSIMION 1 DIV15 1
ISOURW000 I OXAR I 1 1 I l 1
IBLACK CHERRY I PIM" I 1 I I 1 I
(EASTERN HOPHORNBEAN I OSVI I 1 I 1 I I
1AMERICAN PLUM 1 PRAN I 1 I 1 I 1
ICMMMON TRUHPETCREEPER I CARA2 I 1 I I I 1
i POTENTIAL PROOUCIIOM s t
! FAVORABLE YEARS I I
1 NORMAL YEARS I I 1 I 1 1
! UNFAVORABLE YEARS 1 I 1 I I I
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 11 PEDONS IN NORTH CAROLIIA, 0EORGIA, AND SOUTH CAROLINA.
A ADDITIONAL ALLOWABLE UNIFIED ENTRIES ARE: LIMEf1-CL-NL,SM,SC, LINEt2-CL-ML,SN-SC.
B RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART 603, 7-83.
C RATINGS 11ASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL. 9/80.
D WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS HENDRANDIM-71#, JAN 1972.
* SITE INM IS A SUHKARY OF 5 OR MORE MEASUREMENTS ON THIS SOIL.
5

SC0015 SO 1 L °'1 HT ERPRETAT IONS. RECORD
HLRA(S)s 136 PACOLET SERIES..
REV. ONNS, 4-87
TYPIC HAPLUOULTS, CLAYEY, KAOLINITIC, THERMIC
THE PACOLET SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED, MODERATELY PERNEAOLE, SOILS OF THE.PIEDMONT UPLANDS. TYPICALLY THESE SOILS
HAVE 3 INCHES OF BROWN SANDY LOAM SURFACE LAYER AND RID CLAYEY SUBSOILS TO 37 INCHES OVERLYING WEATHERED ROCK. THEY ARE
ON SHORT TO MEDIUM LENGTH SLOPES ADJACENT TO R BOTTHLAIDS AM ORAIMACEWAYS. THEY DEVELOPED IN RESIDUUM WEATHERED FROM
GRANITE, GNEISS AND SCHIST. SLOPES RANGE FROM 2 TO 80 PERCENT.
I ESTIMAItV
Dull. rK1AMtK11rj
"I
TFRACIIpLRCLHI MATERIAL LESS - I
1N.)1 USDA TEXTURE 1 UNIFIED
1(I
1 ASHTO
Of
1 3 INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO. 1 LIMIT ITICITYI.
I I I
I.
I PCT 1 4 1 10 1 ko 1 200 1 (INDEX I
-4z 28 Iw_1 I
1
1 0-3 ICL, SCL ISM -SC, SC
IA-4, A-6
1
1 0-1 195-100 90-100 65-85 36-50 1 20-40 1 k-17 1
I 0-3 ILS ISM
IA-2
1 0-3 175-90 70-85 55-75 15-30 1 30 IIM-3 I
13-2915C. CL, C IML, MH
IA-G. A-7
1 0-1 I80-100 80-100 60-9S 51-75 1 38-65 111-30 1
129-521CL, SCL, SL ICL, CL-HL, SM-SC, SCIA-2. A-\, A-6
1 0-2 180-100 70-100 60-80 30-60 1 20-35 1 5-15 1
152-701SL FSL L ISM SH-SC
IA-k A-2-4
1 0-2 180-100 70-100 60-80 30-50 1 • 28 INP-6 I
16EPTR1 -
- ILROSIONIVIND IORGANICI CORROSIVITY I
I(IN.)1(PCT)1 DENSITY I BILITY IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIOMI(MMHOS/CM)1 SWELL IFACTORSIEROO.IHAATTER I 1
I 1 I G/CGS 1 IN/Fflt 1 (IN/IH
Q.
I. PH I
- -
IPOTENTIALI'l(-TT-IGROUPI PCT 1 1
- 1
1 - - - - . -
1 0-3 120-3511.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.10-0.14
14.5-6.5 1 -
1 LOW 1.21#1 2 1 5 1 .5-1 1
1 0-3 1 5-1511.00-1.50 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.06-0.10
14:5-6.S I -
1 LOW 1.151 3 1 3 1 .5-2 1
1 3-29135-6511.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.12-0.15
14.5-6.0 1 -
1 LOW 1.281
129-52115-3011.20-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15
14.5-6.0 1 -
I LOW 1.281
152-70110-2511.20-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15
14.5-6.0 1 -
I LOW 1.281 .vcTrmrr.
aru.11a!fr'�t1•/:I cl.\�11!!�Cd'l l:: a
SANITARY FACILITIES (8)
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
- I
I
,SEPTIC TAM(
- -
1 8-15%: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY,SLOPE
tl
1 15-25%: FAIR -SLOPE I
1 ABSORPTION
1 15+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 ROADFILL
1 25+%: POOR -SLOPE 1
I FIELDS
1
II
1 I
I
I
-
II
I
- 1
1 SEWAGE
- .
1 7+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11
I 1
I LAGOON
I
It SAND
I 1
I AREAS
I
II
I 1
1
1
II
I 1
1
1-I
I SANITARY
2-n:FINES
1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
II
I
I LANDFILL
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 GRAVEL
I 1
I (TRENCH)
I
11
1 1
1
1
11
1 1
POOR-IQU CLAYtY1
1
1 SANITARY
I Z-n:-15%:
1 8=15\: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
1 15+%: POOR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE 1
I LANDFILL
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 TOPSOIL
1
I (AREA)
I
1
I
11
11
1 1
1 1
1
I DAILY
I Z-B%:-
1 8-15%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
11
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
I COVER FOR
1 15+%: POOR -SLOPE
II
1 2-3%:- 1
1 LANDFILL
1
11 POND
13-8te MODERATE-SEEPACE,SLDPE A.,
I
1
11 RESERVOIR
1 8+%: SEVERE -SLOPE 1
11 AREA
1 1
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (8)
It
I I
MODERATE-�,.
I SHALLOW
-
1 8-15%: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
IIF]DANKMENTS
I 1
(EXCAVATIONS
11S+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 DIKES AND
I 1
I
I
1
1
11 LEVEES
11
I
1 1
I DWELLINGS
-
1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
11 EXCAVATED
- 1
I 1
1 WITHOUT
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 PONDS
I I
1 BASEMENTS
I
1
I
(,AQUIFER FED I 1
11 1 I
11
I DWELLINGS
2-8%:1
1 8-15t: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
I 1
1 WITH
1 15+t: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 DP.AINACE
I 1
I BASEMENTS
I
11
I 1
I
I
11
I
I SMALL
1 4-8%: HODERATE-SLOPE
11
1 3+% SL.FSL,SL,SCL,L: SLOPE H
I COMMERCIAL
1 8+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11
IRRIGATION 1 2-3% LS: FAST INTAKE 1
I BUILDINGS
1
I
1
II
11
1 3+t LS: FAST INTAKE,SLOPE 1
1 I
1
I LOCAL
-
I B-15%: MODERATE -LOW STRENGTH,SLOPE
11
- . .: I
TERRACES 1 8+% CL,SCL,L: SLOPE 1
1 ROADS AND
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11
AD' 1 2-8% SL,LS,FSL: SOIL BLOWING 1
I STREETS
1
11
DIVERSIONS 18+t SL,LS,FSL: SOIL BLOWING,SLOPE 1
I
I
I
I
It
I
1
ILANDSCAPING 1 8-15'%: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
GRASSED 18N:.SLOPE I
I AND GOLF
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
II
WATERWAYS I 1
I FAIRWAYS
I
II
I I
1
1
1
I
I
1

PACOLET SERIES SCOW S
I 1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
SL,LS f'SL: MODERATE-SLrOPE,SMALL STONES I
I CAMP AREAS 1 15+t: SEVERE -SLOPE
IIPLAYCRdROS 1 6+%1 SEVER -SLOPE I
I I
I1
1 1
1 I
_
I l a-15% 1100ERATE-SLOPE
11 PATHS
115-25%: MODERATE -SLOPE I
IPICNIC AREASI 15+t: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 AND
r 25+%: SEVERE -SLAPS I
I I
II TRAILS
1 I
I I
CuromlY AND
YIELDS rt
11
1 I
I
1 DETERMINING 1 BILITY
I .FESCUE
1 MIOAGRA,SS
1• LINT
,1
I 1 1 I I
1 PHASE 1
1 I
1 AUK)
I (AUM) ,
1.. (LBS)
I (BU 1 LBS I 1 1
1
1-
12-6% CL,SLX,EROOED 1 3E 1
1 6.0 1
1 6.0 1
1 SOO 1
—1
175 1 11900 1 1 1 I 1 I
16-10% 1 3E 1
1 6.5 1
1 6.5 1
1 650 1
1 7S 1 11800 1 I I I 1 I
16-10t 0.,50.,ERODED I %E I
1 5.0 1
1 5.0 1
1- I
1 50 1 11600 1 I 1 1 1 1
110-15% 1 IfE I
I S.5 1
1 6.0,1
1 550 1
1 65 I 111400 1 I 1 I 1 1
115-25% 1 6E 1
I- I
I-
125N 1 7E 1'
1- I
I-
110-15% CL,SCL,ERODED 1 GE 1
14.5 1
1 5.5 f
115+% CL,SCL,ERODEO 171E I
I- I
1 I 1
1
1 1
I I
1 1•
1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1
1 1
I I
I I
I I
I I I I 1 I I I I
1
1 DETERMINING
- -
1
I TREES TO PLANT 1
ISYNI
1 PHASE
I
1 IHAZARDILIHIT IHORT'YIHAZARDICOHPETI
IINDIIICLASI I
I1S+%
I BRIHODER.IHOOER.ISLIGHTI I
ISHORTLEAF PINE
170
1 a
ISHORTLEAF PINE 1
I
I I I 1 I I
IYELLOW-POPLAR
190
1 6
IYELLOW-POPLAR I
I
I I 1 I I I
IVIRGIHIA PINE
I-
I-
(EASTERN WHITE PINE I
I
I I I 1 I I
(NORTHERN RED OAK
I-
I-
1 I
1
1 I I I 1 I
,HICKORY
I-
I-
I I
1
I 1 I I I I
(WHITE OAK
I-
I-
1 I
I
1 1 I 1 I I
I
I
I
1 I
I2-15% CL,SCL,ERODED
OD
16CIMER.1110DER.IMODER.1 1
ILOBLOLLY PINE
170
1 6
ILOBLOLLY PINE 1
1
PINE I
I
IYELLOW-POPLAR
180
I S
ISHORTLEAF
YELLOW -POPLAR I
I
1 1 I 1 I I
I
I
I
(EASTERN WHITE PINE I
1
I I 1 I I 1
1
I
I
1 1
1
I 1 I I I I
1
I
I
I I
1
I 1 1 1 I 1
1
1
1
1 1
I I 1 1
1 1 I I
I I
1 1
I I
I I
I I I I
1 1
I I
1 I 1 I
11
11
I I 1 1
1 I
1 I
1 -
1 DETERMINING "-� 1"
1
;
I' PHASE
I FTTi�—
1 SEED ILECUME 1 HERB. 1 TREES IPLANTS 1
IPLAMTS 1 WATER IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
12-1014 0.,50.,ERODED •1
POOR, I POOR I POOR 1 FAIR 1 FAIR 1
_ IV. POORIV. 1
- IV. POORIV..POORI POOR .I FAIR IV.-POORI - `I
I10-15�
I POOR I FAIR I POOR I FAIR I FAIR I
- IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR IV. POORI - I
115+11
110-15% CL,SCL,ERODED
IV. POORI POOR 1 POOR I FAIR I FAIR 1
IV, POORI POOR IV. POORI POOR 1 POOR I -
- IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR IV., POORI - 1
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORI POOR IV. POORI - 1
115+% CL,SCL,ERODED
IV.-POORIV.-POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORI -
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORI - I
YLICMIn IIN rnRJG
COMMON PLANT WINE I SYMBOL I -
I (NLSPHI 1 1
IPAN ICUM
1 PANIC
1 a
,TALL OATCRASS
1 AREL3
1 2
ISWITCHCANE
1 ARTE4*
1 6
'HONEYSUCKLE
1 LONIC
1 29
1
9
1
I I I
ICRAPE
I VITIS
1 If
1-
-
I
1 1 I
ITICKCLOVER
I DESHO
1 2
1
6
1
1 I I
1LESPEDEZA
I LESPE
1
I
12
1
I 1 1
IELLIOTT BLUESTEN
I ANEL
1 -
1
12
1
ISPLITBEARD BLUESTEN
I ANTE2
I -
1
12
1
1UHKNOWNS
I UUUU
I a -
1
31
1
I I I
1
I
I
I 1 I
,
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
FAVORABLE YEARS
I
1
I
NORMAL YEARS
1 2450
1
1650
1
1 I I
I
UNFAVORABLE YEARS
1 1950
1
1450
1
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 6 PEDONS
B RATINGS USED ON NSH, PART 11, SECTION 403.
C WHITE PINE CAN BE CROWN AT HIGHER ELEVATIONS.

co
OD
Ol
W
m
U3
a
W
N
T
X
Ian
o 43
V
V
V
4.)
43
4J
V
m
m
... 0
m.
ro
ro
ro
ro
ro
ro
L
4.)
A
+yj •^
O V
m
'D
m
'D
m
m
m
m
C
C
C
C
1%.
L C
O
O
O
V
-0
Z7
tm
DI
'D
tm
DI
M
'0D
VI
'D
'mD
c L
r 7
p y
V —
w.
S
—r
S
.-
— Z
~
O
Z
-. —
O
Z --------
~
O
Z
r
S
r
S
S
=
^
0
O
O
J�1
1
1
-.r—r.-.----r.-.r—r--2--.-..-.
t
1
1
1
... ...--Zr.•.mr...-..
---r
m O
O a—
43
43
V
1
C 4-
V m
t0-Se
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A
1
1
N O V
m
'D
.0
.G
.0
.0
.0
.L
1
I
I
L
1
1
1
Il i�
C N
O
V
-0
M
tT
DI
tJt
tm
M
tm
M
t"
.D
.0
IT
0 43
S
O
S
O
-J
O
Z
=
r
S
•r
S
r
S
r
S
r
S
r
S
.•.
S
S
S
J
2
ro
ro
N
V L m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
O ro
V 43
L S
�.
.... ...
r... ..
— — —
— -.—.-..-.----.---rrr
�•
�• r. �. r.
�. �.
�• �. �4. r.
_•�.—�•—�.
M
••r�.�.�.��.�.��•r.��.�.�.�.�•
C a
CI
4
W
lD
t0
l0
a
t0
t0
ID
0
l0
'
y
W
o c
o
11.r
�°•
Mrrrr••,•�••----
..a..
---.tir.r••••rM•••
o••rrr•••.----••yr•••....
L
°•
••. •••.--►+�.•rru••r---------
L
ro
L
ro
1¢
ro C
m C
V
1
1
11
>
1
1
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
V
C
U
O
m
1
1
1
O
I
1
ro
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
ro
y
—�...r...
O•
-------
Z
r
r—....stir.-.
.r
.-.. .r ..
---------------...------
ro
43
r ---------
Lr
mL
m
L O
m Cr
L
1
1
1
ro
V •r
Y
ro
1
I
1
I
1
I
m
1
1
1
1
V
L.
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
re
U
a V
;
d
CL
I
O.
C.
L
0
ro C
_
rr
r
r
IL
-C
ty
e c
s
v:
u;
tn
o
v1
w a
+/
N
O
O
O
r-
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
In
m
V.
431
1
In
t0
.
tD
tD
1
to
tD
tC
1
IIi.
t0
t0
tp
tD
tp
ID
1
CDO
1
•L C
a ro
G
�.
..y
....................._,.................rrrrrrr.........—rr..rrr-
O
r'•
----
_PAa
wm
41
1
1
1
1
1¢
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_ro
L
i
i
i
1
>
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
()
1
1
O_
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
1
E,D
rrrrrrrrrrrrr�
Z
r��•
..rrrrrrrr—rrrrrr••..rrrrrrr--....-
w1%
........---
—
C 4.1
O
1
1
N M ro
1
m m E
r
1
E •r
c i1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
G +1
m
1
1
1
1
W
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
W
1
7 O
O 7
N C
O O
L
L
V, m 0
r
�.
r .•....
r r
�..
.•.
r... ......
m
�..-.
r r
r �.
... r r;
.•. nn
r �.
M r �.
• . �. �. �.
�. rr
�.
�.
�. �.
r
�. m �.
�.
= C
I
1
;
1
t
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
r
r r
1
�.
• •. �. �.
1
• r
4-2
m m
>1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
v N L
V
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ro
1
to V
C
1
1
1
C
1
D O L
m
1
1
1
1
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
O
1
C •-
1
1
1
1
m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•r
1
ro ro
IcT
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
N
1
N 43
m
m
m
0
m
D'
0
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C t0
L
L
C
t.
C
m
C
c
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
V
C
Z
Z
.- m°
-0 E y1
r .» ..
_.........
IY
Z �..-..-.............
IL
�.... _.....
Z _................
Z
r.
Z
r r r
Z
r r
Z
r ....... -
Z
...... _..•.
Z
r
r
r w.....•.......
Z
O
——
Z
M — _..-...
m to
I
—
•.V-
V
L DI 0
L --
v o o
-
L)
In
a
m
ti
ci
to
t,
m
V
m
m
m
m
m
V
V O L0
M r- Lor
ro�
A C
rr
r
M
r r r
r r
rr r
r
r r
r r
r
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr--------r—rrrrr
...
N L
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NI�I
1
1
t
1
1
13 m V
'D
C.0 C
C
1
1
1
1
1
V
wl
1
1
wm
1
1
1
1
1
ro 1- O
t0 r•
1
1
1
1
1
C
G 1
I
V
1
O /L
I
1
I
I
I
V
O
1
I
I
1
1
C7
L I '+m
1do
IT . to
E -O
E>%
1
1
1
1
1
U N r-
1
1
CL w
1
1
'D
1
1
1
N
C �1
ro
1 V
1
1 m
N
1 do
N
w> •>
1
N
1
wN
1
1
C
1
I
•r )( {1
C N
I N
1 DI
1 .O
m
1
m
t.% t.7 m
1
m e
V
V m m
+1
C
.-%
(�
1 •em•
1 •mr
m
O
1•>'
1
E
1
m
1 V
c C
L m
1 0
VO
ul ro
toIL —
m
O
c
I>
1 W
+m3 C
r• O.
- •n
0
V .-•
I ro
V O
t7 w L
1 c
z to
Z V
CL O
.--
U)
C
I1:
I L
1 m
{4,
O
•r ro
I ro
1 .-
1 V
1;
V
N O
I m
r
ro
w V
w O
r
m
N
C
t m
1 DI
L
11
O E
N
1 43
<—
1 C.
m 0.
1 C
m 7
.0
m m
t m
w N
O m
wm m
m > v
1 .-
m
w-0
O ro
w N
m m
wW ro
m ro1L
�I V
OD ro
'L7
m
d
L
r
w 0
m•r
1>
Qr
1 v
m m
O
as
c�v
vcrT
x
o
�
>>
<
mem
ua
0L.
_�
=a
�_
Ma
�a
CL
r>
��
NN
m

CIO
co
OI
S
(K
W
ym
F
IL
W
N
amp
+/
+m.�
V
++
U
m
m
m
m
m
1
I
1
iI m
�0
1
1
ro
m
1
1
1
L
1
1
L
O
0
U N
Of
tT
tT
'V
tT
tT
'p
1 N
= C
1
1
1
1
1
rr-.rrrrrrr
=
rOrtO0
rr
rNrIO
rrrrrr
Gr
CI
tOD
tD
D
lO
p
r
rrrrrr r.rrrr— -. r...r—rrrrrr
L.
N
C.
¢1
iJ
1
1
1
1
1
I
C
1
>
1
1
1
1
1
O
1
O
1
1
1
1
1
Z
r
r r r
r r r rV
Z
r
r
r r r
r
r r r r
r r
r
r r r
c
v
m
i
1
•.C-
q
1
1
1
1
Y
1
0.
1
1
1
1
1
a
—r
...r............rorrr..rrr....r...rr...rrr
4.)
+.I,
0
LL.
tD
O
to
W
to
t0
tD
rr
In
rr....r...r....-------------rrr...
t
C
1
t
1
I
1
1
1
O
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
i
r ---------------------------
0
43
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
0
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
tr
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
CO
EL.O
0
O
OC
O
C
rrrr.Z.....r..Z..r.rrZ...:rrZ....Z....�rrr
1 Ur
O •.-
L. tT 0
0
O
In
m
V
0
m
� 'O
L.
217
.-.
; r;
r r r
I
1
1
1
1
t
1
c
�.qq-
i
11
10
ID
E E
c
0
i
i
�!
{c
m >1
m
I L.
1
0 1
t-
r�
C V)
1 0
1 E
1
•r
1
O
•>
I.0
I N
1
>
N
.0
r- C.
c
I V)1
t
I
V)
1
N
1!I
L.
C
.0
w C
C
m
0 E
^
1 L
It O
O
O
C
U
0
+1
t9t,t�
L.
33
EN
M
3m
X
3C3
NN
33
4c
1_y

SOIL SURVEY LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SEPTEMBER 14, 1988
TABLE L.--SANITARY FACILITIES
(Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of
"slight," "good," and other terms. Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated. The
information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for
onsite investigation)
Soil name and 1 Septic tank 1 Sewage lagoon 1 Trench ! Area ! Daily cover
map symbol 1 absorption I areas I sanitary 1 sanitary ! for landfill
I fields ! ! landfill I landfill I
1
!
1
!
!
AaA----------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Fair:
Altavista I wetness.
1 wetness.
I wetness.
1 wetness.
! wetness,
I
!
1
I
1 too clayey.
I
ApB----------------- IModerate:
I
!Moderate:
1
!Moderate:
1
!Slight -----------
1
!Fair:
Appling 1 peres slowly.
! seepage,
1 too clayey.
!
I too clayey,
1
I
! slope.
I
1
I
1
I
1 hard to pack.
!
Bn8----------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Poor:
Buncombe ! poor filter.
! seepage,
! seepage,
! seepage.
! seepage,
I
I flooding.
I too sandy.
1
I too sandy.
I
I
1
1
I
CcB, CeB2----------- IModerate:
!Moderate:
!Moderate:
!Slight -----------
IFair:
Cecil 1 peres slowly.
! seepage,
1 too clayey.
I
! too clayey,
I
I slope.
I
1
I hard to pack.
!
1
1
I
I
ChA----------------- ISevere:
ISevere:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Poor:
Chewacla 1 flooding,
1 flooding,
! flooding,
! flooding,
! hard to pack,
1 wetness.
I wetness.
I wetness.
I wetness.
1 wetness.
1
GaD----------------- ISevere:
I
ISevere:
!
!Severe:
I
!Severe:
I
!Poor:
Gaston I slope.
I slope.
I slope,
1 slope.
I too clayey,
I
I
I
I too clayey.
!
I hard to pack,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 slope.
GnB2---------------- IModerate:
!Moderate:
ISevere:
1 I
!Slight ----------- !Poor:
Gaston I peres slowly.
I seepage,
I too clayey.
I
1 too clayey,
I
I
1 slope.
1
I
1
1 hard to pack.
GnC2---------------- IModerate:
!Severe:
I
!Severe:
I
!Moderate:
!
!Poor:
Gaston 1 peres slowly,
! slope.
I too clayey.
I slope.
I too clayey,
I slope.
I
i
I
i hard to pack.
I
GrB----------------- IModerate:
I
!Moderate:
1
!Moderate:
1 !
!Slight ----------- IFair:
Georgeville 1 peres slowly.
! seepage,
1 too clayey.
I
! too clayey,
ii
slope.
!
i
I hard to pack.
GrC----------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
!Moderate:
!Moderate:
!Fair:
Georgeville I peres slowly,
1 slope.
! slope,
! slope.
1 too clayey,
1 slope.
I
!
i too clayey.
i
1 hard to pack,
I
I
I
1 slope.
GrD----------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
1
!Severe:
I
!Severe:
!
!Poor:
Georgeville slope.
slope.
slope.
slope.
I slope.
i
GvB2---- ------------ IModerate:
i
IModerate:
i
!Moderate:
i 1
!Slight ----------- !Fair:
Georgeville I peres slowly.
1 seepage,
I too clayey.
1
1 too clayey,
I
I
I slope.
I
I
I
I hard to pack.
GvC2---------------- IModerate:
!Severe:
I
IModerate:
I
!Moderate:
!
!Fair:
Georgeville I peres slowly,
I slope.
1 slope,
! slope.
I too clayey,
1 slope.
1
I too clayey.
1
! hard to pack,
I
I
I
1
1
I
!
I
! slope.
I
HeB----------------- ISevere:
!Moderate:
ISevere:
!Moderate:
!Poor:
Helena 1 wetness,
1 slope.
I wetness,
I wetness.
1 too clayey,
peres slowly.
i
too clayey.
I
! hard to pack.
i
I
10

TABLE L.--SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
Soil name and 1 Septic tank I Sewage lagoon I Trench I Area I Daily cover
map symbol I absorption I areas I sanitary I sanitary 1 for landfill
1 fields 1 I landfill I landfill 1
MaD----------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Poor:
Madison 1 slope.
I slope.
1 slope.
I slope.
I slope,
I
I
I
I
I thin layer.
I
I
I
I
I
MdB2---------------- IModerate:
IModerate:
!Moderate:
!Slight ----------- !Poor:
Madison I peres slowly.
1 seepage,
1 too clayey.
1
I thin layer.
I
I slope.
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
MdC2 ---------------- IModerate:
!Severe:
!Moderate:
!Moderate:
!Poor:
Madison I peres slowly,
I slope.
1 slope,
I slope.
1 thin layer.
I slope.
I
I too clayey.
1
I
!
I
I
I
!
Ms6----------------- lHoderate:
IModerate:
!Severe:
ISlight----------- !Poor:
Masada 1 peres slowly.
! seepage,
! too clayey.
I
I too clayey,
I
I slope.
I
!
I hard to pack.
I
I
I
I
!
MSC ----------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Moderate:
1Poor:
Masada I slope,
1 slope.
I too clayey.
1 slope.
I too clayey,
I peres slowly.
1
I
I
I hard to pack.
I
I
I
I.
1
PaS----------------- IModerate:
!Moderate:
1Slight----------- ISlight----------- !Fair:
Pacolet I peres slowly.
1 seepage,
!
i
1 too clayey.
1
I slope.
!
1
!
PaC----------------- !Moderate:
ISevere:
IModerate:
IModerate:
!Fair:
Pacolet 1 peres slowly,
1 slope.
1 slope.
I slope.
I too clayey,
I slope.
I
1
1
l slope.
I
PaD, PaE------------ ISevere:
1
ISevere:
1
!Severe:
1
!Severe:
!
!Poor:
Pacolet I slope.
I slope.
1 slope.
1 slope.
1 slope.
1
1
I
1
I.
PeB2 ---------------- IModerate:
IModerate:
ISlight----------- !Slight -----------
(Fair:
Pacolet 1 peres slowly.
1 seepage,
!
!
1 too clayey.
d
1 slope.
1
!
I
PeC2---------------- IModerate:
!Severe:
!Moderate:
!Moderate:
!Fair:
Pacolet I peres slowly,
1 slope.
1 slope.
1 slope.
! too clayey,
slope.
1
I
I slope.
i
i
I
1
!
Pme*: I
1
1
!
1
Pacolet ------------ IModerate:
!Moderate:
1Slight----------- !Slight ----------- (Fair:
I peres slowly.
I seepage,
1
1
1 too clayey.
I
1 slope.
1
!
I
Madison ------------ IModerate:
IModerate:
!Moderate:
!Slight ----------- !Poor:
1 peres slowly.
1 seepage,
1 too clayey.
1
I thin layer.
1
I slope.
1
1
I
I
!
I
!
!
Urban land. !
!
1
!
!
!
I
!
1
I
PmC*: I
1
I
I
I
Pacolet ------------ IModerate:
ISevere:
IModerate:
IHoderate:
!Fair:
1 peres slowly,
1 slope.
1 slope.
1 slope.
1 too clayey,
1 slope.
!
I
!
1 slope.
I
1
1
1
1 -
Madison ------------ IModerate:
!Severe:
IModerate:
!Moderate:
!Poor:
I peres slowly,
I slope.
1 slope,
I slope.
1 thin layer.
1 slope.
I
! too clayey.
I
1
!
I
1
1
Urban land. !
1
!
1
!
See footnote at and of table.
11

ZT
•alge4 ;o pue ge u4ou400; wS
i
•odols i
I
I
1
l
i
•adols i
i
•odols I
'�Cpues ooq i
•aSedaas 1
•a6edaas 1
'a6edaas i
',SlMols salad 1
:J1ed1
:aJanaSl
:eJanaS1
:oJanaS1
:a4eJOPOW1--------- GILJASXDO14
I
•sauOzs llems
•adols I
•adols I
•adols I
•AIMOIs salad I
:JOOdl
:azeJapOW1
:ezeJapoHl
:aJanaSl
:aJaAaSI---------- oJogsuulAl
i
.409d oq pJey i
f
1
i
i
I
cAvAelo 004 1
1
*AoXelo oo; I
-�IaoJ oq y-4dop I
*41Mols salad I
13looJ o3 ypdap i
•xooJ cm yzdap I
'KooJ oz LMdop i
'adols I
'�,IooJ o4 ypdop 1
:JOOdl
:aJaABSi
:aJQAOSI
:aJOAaSI
:aJanaSl--------------- UOIZ
1
f
1
f
i
i
•odols i
•odols i
-adols i
I
•adols I
'a6edaas 1
'a6edaas i
'a6edaas i
-odols i
:JOOdl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaS1--------- al11A24DOW
• aed 1
x cq PJe4 i
1
I
•odols I
i
•odols i
CAGAelo 004 1
•adols i
0(e1a 004 1
•XaOJ 04 44dop I
cXLmols salad i
'xaoJ oq y4dop i
=..
')jOOJ o4 ypdop i
')IooJ o4 y3dep I
'adols I
'�jooJ oq 4zdop i
:JOOdl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl--------------- UO1Z
i
i
i
i
1 :*3wZ
i
i
1
I
i
•ssau4aM 1
'xoed o4 pJey i
j
-AGAela 004 i
i
•ssauMOM j
1 g 1
•ssau}aM 1
'ssau2aM l
l
'IC1Mols salad 1 meysJoM
:JOOdl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl-----------
Z461151
:aJaAaS1----------------- VOM
I
•sauo3s flews
I
i
•adols i
-41mols soJad I o,ogsuulM
:JOodi----------- 4461ISi----------- 44611S1
:04piepowl
:aJanaSl----------------- SUM
i
1
I
1
I
f
f
i
f
i Puel uegJn
*in
f
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
l szua4;Jopn
1
i
f
1
1 • P(1
1
i
T
I
i
•ssau�aM 1
l
I
i
i
')jaed o3 pJey 1
1
'AGAe1a 004 1
1
-AlMols salad i
'Aake10 004 1
•ssau4om i
'ssauZOM i
•adols 1
'ssau40M 1 plal;a6paS
:JOOdl
I
:aJanaSl
i
:aJOAaS1
:a4eJapoWl
:aJanaS1----------------- 90S
1
•ssou4aM i
i
•ssau4aM 1
i
•ssau40M 1
f
i
1
'a6edaas i
'a6edaas l
'bUlPool; 1
•ssau4aM l
•ssou4em 1
'6ulPool;•i
'bulpool; i
'a6edaas I
'6ULP0014 I Ma1A.JaAIjj
:JIed1
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJOADS1----------------- VAB
i
f
I
i
1
•adols 1
1
1
•adols I
1
''Welo 004 1
•a6edaas i
•96edaas i
9a6edaas I
•adols i UOIN
:J1ed1
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:a4eJaPoWI----------------- DUE
•404Pla 004 1
•a6edaas 1
•a6edaas I
-a6edaas I
I u01I1
:J1ed1
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl
:aJanaSl----------- 4461131----------------- SUB
• I
I
1
i
i
i
1
I
i
i s41d
i
i
i
i
i '*4d
f
i
I
i
f
i
i
i
111atPUel i
ll1;PUel 1
1
1
1
sPlaW f
IllOUe-1 Jo; i
ICJeapes I
'SJe4Iues I
seoie i
uol4dJosge i loquLft dew
Janos ALlea I
1
paid f
1
yauaJl i
1
uo06el a6eMaS I
1
)Iuey o pdoS i pup oweU 110s
1
panul:tUoD--S3I111i:)Vd kHVIINYS--•l 313V1

TABLE L.--SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
Soil name and I Septic tank
! Sewage lagoon I
Trench
1
Area
I Daily cover
map symbol 1 absorption
I areas 1
sanitary
I
sanitary
1 for landfill
I fields
I I
landfill
I
landfill
I
1
!
!
I
!
ZwO*: !
1
1
1
I
Zion --------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
[Severe:
IPoor:
I depth to rock,
! slope,
1 depth to rock,
i depth to rock,
I depth to rock,
I peres slowly,
I depth to rock.
! too clayey,
I slope.
I too clayey,
I slope.
I
1 slope.
I
I hard to pack.
1
I
I
I
!
Winnsboro ---------- !Severe:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Poor:
! peres slowly,
I slope.
1 slope.
I slope.
I slope,
1 slope.
1
I
!
I small stones.
1 I •
I
I
I
I
Hocksville--------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Poor:
I slope.
I seepage,
1 seepage,
1 seepage,
I slope.
I
1 slope.
I slope.
1 slope.
!
!
1
1
!
I
W.
Water
* See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
E

TABLE P.--WATER MANAGEMENT
(Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of
"slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not evaluated. The
information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsita
investigation)
Limitations or--
I
features affectin --
Soil name and 1 eond
I Embankments,
I Aquifer-fedTerraces
map symbol 1 reservoir
I dikes, and
1 excavated
1 Drainage
I and 1 Grassed-
! areas
I levees
I ponds
I
I diversions ! waterways
AaA--------------- !Moderate:
!Severe:
!Moderate:
lFavorable------!Wetness-------- lFavorable.
Altavista I seepage.
1 piping,
I deep to water,!
! I
I
I wetness.
1 slow refill.
1
I I
I
I
l
I
! 1
Ape -------- ------- !Moderate:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
lFavorable ------ lFavorable.
Appling ! seepage,
1 hard to pack.
1 no water.
I
I 1
1 slope.
1
1
!
I I
I
1
1
I
I I
BnB--------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
!Too sandy ------ !Droughty,
Buncombe 1 seepage.
1 seepage,
! no water.
1
I 1 rooting depth.
I
1 piping.
!
i
! 1
I
I
I
!
1 I
CcB, CeB2--------- IModerate:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
lFavorable ------ [Favorable. '
Cecil I seepage,
I piping,
I no water.
1
I 1
! slope.
I hard to pack.
I
!
I 1
1
I
1
ChA-------- ------- ;Moderate:
!Severe:
Moderate:
IFlooding-------
!Wetness -------- !Wetness.
Chewacla I seepage.
1 piping,
I slow refill.
!
I 1
I
I hard to pack,
I
1
1 I
l
1 wetness.
1
I
1 I
!
1
1
I
1 i
GaD--------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Slope ---------- !Slope.
Gaston 1 slope.
I hard to pack.
I no water.
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
GnB2-------------- !Moderate:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to'water
lFavorable ------ lFavorable.
Gaston 1 seepage,
! hard to pack.
1 no water.
I
1 1
1 slope.
1
1
1
! !
I
1
1
1
! I
GnC2 -------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope------ ---- ISlope.
Gaston 1 slope.
1 hard to pack.
1 no water.
I
I 1
I
I
1
!
! I.
GrB--------------- !Moderate:
ISevere:
!Severe:
IDeep.to water
!Erodes easily !Erodes easily.
Georgeville 1 slope,
1 hard to pack.
! no water.
I
I 1
I seepage.
I
I
1
! I
1
I
I
1
I I
GrC, GrD---------- ISevere:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope, !Slope,
Georgeville I slope.
1 hard to pack.
I no water.
1
1 erodes easily.1 erodes easily.
1
1
1
1
1 I
GvB2 -------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Erodes easily !Erodes easily.
Georgeville I slope,
1 hard to pack.
I no water.
I
! I
1 seepage.
!
I
!
1 !
GvC2-------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope, !Slope,
Georgeville 1 slope.
I hard to pack.
! no water.
I
I erodes easily.1 erodes easily.
I
1
!
l
I 1
HeS------- -------- IModerate:
ISevere:
ISevere:
1Pere3 slowly,
!Wetness, IPeres slowly.
Helena 1 slope.
1 hard to pack.
1 no water.
I slope.
I soil blowing, 1
I
I
i
1
1 Peres slowly. 1
1
1
1
1
! -1
MaD--------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope---------- !Slope.
Madison 1 slope.
I hard to pack.
1 no water.
1
1 !
1
1
I
i
1 1
MdB2 -------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
lFavorable ------ lFavorable.
Madison I seepage,
I hard to pack.
I no water.
I
1 1
1 slope.
1
1 •1
I I
I
1
1
I
I 1
34

TABLE P.--WATER MANAGEMENT --Continued
imitations or--
I
features ar actin --
Soil name and ! Pond
I h=ankment3,
I Aquirer-tederraces
map symbol I reservoir
I dikes, and
I excavated
I Drainage
! and I Grassed
1 areas
I levees
ponds
I
I diversions I waterways
MdC2-------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
ISlope---------- !Slope.
Madison I slope.
I hard to pack.
I no water.
!
I I
I
I
I
I
1 I
MsB--------------- !Moderate:
IModerate:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
(Favorable ------!Favorable.
Masada I seepage,
1 thin layer,
1 no water..
I
I I
! slope.
! hard to pack.
!
I
1 !
MsC--------------- ISevere:
IModerate:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope---------- ISlope.
Masada ! slope.
I thin layer,
! no water.
I
I !
!
I hard to pack.
!
I
I I
1
!
I
!
! !
PaS--------------- IModerate:
!Severe:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
ISoil blowing ---!Favorable.
Pacolet I seepage,
I piping.
I no water.
I
! !
I slope.
I
I
I
II
I
1
!
I
i I
PaC, PaD, PaE----- ISevere:
ISevere:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
ISoil blowing, ISlope.
Pacolet I slope.
! piping.
1 no water.
!
I slope. !
I
I
I
I
I I
PeB2 -------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Favorable ------ (Favorable.
Pacolet I seepage,
! piping.
I no water.
1
I !
.I slope.
!
!
!
1 !
I
1
!
!
! !
PeC2 -------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Slope ---------- ISlope.
Pacolet I slope.
I piping.
I no water.
1
I !
i
I
I
!
I I
PmB*: I
I
I
I
I !
Pacolet ---------- IModerate:
!Severe:
!Severe: =
IDeep to water
!Favorable ------ !Favorable.
l seepage,
I piping.
I no water.
1
! I
! slope.
!
!
!
I !
Madison ---------- IModerate:
!Severe:
!Severe:
IDeep to water
!Favorable ------ lFavorable.
! seepage,
I hard to pack.
1 no water.
I
! I
1 slope.
I
!
!
I !
I
I
!
I
! I
Urban land. I
!
1
l
! 1
I
1
1
1
! !
PmC*: !
1
I
I
I !
Pacolet ---------- !Severe:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
ISlope---------- !Slope.
I slope.
! piping.
I no water.
!
I I
I
1
!
I
1 1
Madison ---------- ISevere:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Slope ---------- ISlope.
I slope.
!'hard to pack.
I no water.
1
! !
Urban land.
!
!
!
I
I I
Pt*. !
!
1
1
I 1
Pits 1
I
!
!
! 1
I
I
1
!
1 !
RnB--------------- ISevere:
ISevere:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
ISoil blowing ---!Droughty.
Rion I seepage.
! piping.
I no water.
I
I 1
I
I
I
I
I I
RnC--------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
ISevere:
!Deep to water
!Soil blowing, !Slope,
Rion ! seepage,
I piping.
I no water.
I
1 slope. I droughty.
I slope.
1
I
!
1 1
1
I
I
!
1 I
RvA---- -----------ISevere:
!Severe:
!severe:
IDeep to water
!Favorable ------ (Favorable., '
Riverview i seepage.
i piping.
i cutbanks cave.!
1
i
SOB --------------- IModerate:
ISevere:
ISevere:
IPeres slowly ---!Wetness, !Wetness,
Sedgefiold I seepage.
I hard to pack.
I no water.
I
I peres slowly. I peres slowly.
I
I
!
I
I I
See footnote at and of table.
15

TABLE P.--WATER MANAGEMENT --Continued
Imitations or--
I
Features a ectin --
Soil name and 1 Pond
I Embankments,
I Aquifer -fed
F
I Terraces
map symbol I reservoir
I dikes, and
I excavated
I Drainage
I and
1 Grassed
1 areas
I levees
1 ponds
I
I diversions
1 waterways
Ud. !
!
1
!
I
I
Udorthents I
!
!
!
!
1
1
I
!
1
!
1
Ur*. 1
I
I
!
!
!
Urban land I
1
1
!
!
!
WnB--------------- Moderate:
!Severe:
ISevere:
IDeep to water
!Soil blowing --- IPeres slowly.
Winnsboro 1 slope.
I piping.
! no water.
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
!
WoA--------------- ISlight--------- ISevere:
!Severe:
IPeres slowly --- lWetness,
!Wetness,
Worsham I
! wetness.
I slow refill.
I
I peres slowly.
I peres slowly.
I
I
I
I
I
I
ZmE*: !
1
I
!
I
I
Zion ------------- ISevere:
ISevere:
!Severe:
!Deep to water
!Slope,
!Slope,
I slope.
I thin layer.
1 no water.
!
! depth to rock.! droughty.
!
1
I
I
I
I
Mocksville------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
IDeep to water
!Slope,
!Slope.
! seepage,
1 seepage,
! no water.
I
I too sandy.
!
! slope.
! piping.
!
I
I
!
!
1
I
1
!
I
ZwC*, ZwD*: 1
1
1
I
!
!
Zion ------------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe: %
!Deep to water
ISlope,
!Slope,
I slope.
I thin layer.
1 no water.
I
I depth to rock.! droughty.
I
1
I
!
!
!
Winnsboro -------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
IDeep to water
lSiope,
lSiope,
I slope.
! piping.
I no water.
I
I soil blowing.
I peres slowly.
Mocksville------- ISevere:
!Severe:
!Severe:
IDeep to water
!Slope,
!Slope.
I seepage,
I seepage,
I no water.
I
I too sandy.
I
1 slope.
I piping.
I
!
!
I
1
i
1
I
I
I
W.
Water' 1
!
I
I
!
1
* See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
16

REPORT NUMBER
R024-U86
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond Virginia 23234 a [phone]
SEND
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL 14ASTE 0131"
P 0 Sox 170
ADVANCE NC 27006
SATE OF REPORT 011 2 5/ 9 0 PAGE 1
to 2 � �594 14tL
R�G ACCI 9 4r1-, OR
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
GROWER: LE ONHA RDT BY: 6 N MA C K I N
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
PH
HYDRO-
Cation
PERCENT
LAB
MATTER
GEN
Exchange
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
Pl
P2
K
Mg
Ca
Na
%
%
%
%
%ENR
SAMPLE
NUMBER
�
(Weak Bray)
NaHCOTP
••••
•�•
•••
•••
SOIL
BUFFER
H
Capacity
P v
C.E.C.
NUMBER
RATE Ibs./A
Ppm- P RATE
ppm P RATE
ppm K RATE
pprn Mg RATE
ppm Ca RATE
ppm Na RATE
PH
pH
meq/100g
meq/1009
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
11
U136r.•%
2. 3 97V
41 VH
413 14
4 V
1 5.7 M
230 L
49 M
5.3
6.8
C.9
.3.0
7.2
16.0
38.6
31.0
7. '.
12
01379
2.9 109H
36 H
40 M
'35 L
56 M
210 L
46 L
5.0
.6.8
1.3
3.1
2.9
15.2
34.3
41.0
6.5
13
01371
2.5 101H
45 VH
50 H
46 L
95 Vr}
330 L
46 L
5.5
6.8
1.0
3.7
3.2
21.2
44.2
26.1-1
5.4
14
U1 372
2.2 85M
2C M
24 L
154 V4
144 VP
440- M
47 L
6.3
6.9
0.5
4.5
g5.8
26.9
49.2
10.5
4b6
15
01373
2.3 87M
20 M
26 M
193 V
4 146 0
430. 14
43 L.
6.4
6.9
0.4
4.4
11.1
27.3
4�:. 3
9. 0
4.
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MANGA•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB•
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
NUMBER
NO3
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
LIME
RATE
CI
Me
%
%
%
SOIL
pp-NO3 N naTE
ppmS RATE
ppm-Zn RATE
ppm-Mo RATE
ppm-Fa RATE
ppm Cu RATE
ppm-B RATE
mmhostcm RATE
ppm-CI RATE
ppm-Ma RATE
SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE _
11
2.2 L
16 1"
'10 11
0.' f'
12
1.0 VL
5 L
15
3.3 Vii
13
1.0 V L
9 L
16 H
0.9 P1
This rep app only to the samples) tested. Samples are relalnetl
a max m o thl y days after testing.
14
1. 5 L
6 L
15 r
0 8 F,
EA T N AGRICULTURAL ORA
15
1.6 L
8 L
1.5
0.7 I
�RIES.
C. 0 1 JO
/
BY
c 1 u -r rev-: v-Y Lvw Iv", uuw IL), me Drum Im), rerun I"), vcnr "run Ivnl, AINU NUNt IN •... MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 4.6 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 V

REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond Virginia 23234 as [phone]
R024-086
AtLA
RED -
SEND TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISF
P 0 BOX 170
ADVANCE NC 27006
)ATE OF REPORT 01I 25 11? 0 PAGE
GROWER: LEONHARDT
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCI # 43129
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY: 6 N MA C K I N
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
Cation
PERCENT
LAB
MATTER
HYDRO-
Exchange
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
PI
P2
K
--
Mg
Ca
Na
SAMPLE
NUMBER
Y ••
(Weak
NaHCO3P
,�
,.
SOIL
BUFFER
GEN
Capacity
%
%
or
_ —
oa
-----
or
NUMBER
ENR
RATE Ihs./A
ppm• P RATE
....
ppm P RATE
..
ppm K RATE
..
ppm Mg RATE
....
ppm•Cit HATE
...
ppm-Na RATE
pH
pH
H
meq/100g
C.E.C.
meq/100g
K
Mg
a
Ca
H
Na
16
01374
2.2 951"l
835 VN
S" ti VI
86 V
4 72 H
210 L
44 L
5.2
6.8
1.1
3.1
7.0
19.1
33.4
34. i
r1,.1
IACC CAA LAIVA I IUIV UIV t5A1:K1
MANGA•
-
SOLUBLE
MOLYB-
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
NUMBER
NO3
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cal
B
LIME
RATE
CI
Mo
%
%
%
SOIL
PP. NO3 N RATE
ppm S RATE
ppm.Zn RATE
ppm-Mn RATE
ppm—Fe RATE
ppm Cu RATE
ppm•8 RATE
mmhos/cm RATE
ppm Cl RATE
PPm Me RATE
SANG
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE
16
2. ? L
1? 1 1i
20 11
2 .3 H
This report applies only to the samplelsi tested. Samples are retained
a maximum o/ thirty days after testing.
A i L E N GRICULTURAL LABO RIES, INC.
A JO E.
By
111-11"r Inc"=—�l J IN PPm CY 4.0 1 U CUIVVEH I lU L9S. PEH ACRE P,05

REPORT NUMBER
R024-086 A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC.
7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 804-743-940WS)
SEND ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP
T0: P 0 BOX 170 CUSTOMER: LEONHARDT
ADVANCE NC 27006
DATE OF REPORT 1/26J90 PAGE 1
aj %oo
14tL
0
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT BY: G N MACKIN
SAMPLE
L>b
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manga-
Copper
Zinc
Amnmiia
Nitrat?
(DENT.
No..
%N
phorus
slum
%S
% Ca
nesiurtiese
%Na
ppm Fe
ppm AlAI
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrod^n
%P
o K
%
%Mg
ppin Mn
%
ppin
11
01369
12
01370
13
01371
14
01372
15
01373
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-"
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
5elehi6ni
ppm Cd
miuNO. Cr
ppm Ni
ppm Pb
pprn As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
Nitrogen
96
ppm?
01369
<0.5
" 5
10
01370
0.5
5
20
01371
0.5
,/, 5
15
01372
�,0.5
<5
20
013'73
0.5
-1�5
15
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
retained a maximum of. thirty days alter testing
, Ph.D.
ul C.-. ((J�,,Ch--u��
�IL
8
A L�A�aYGRRICULTURAL ORATOR" INC.
�.
By / 1� �� [ l Y�1:2
_-

REPORT NUMBER
R024-086 A Et L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES INC pu.
7621 WHITEPINE RD. RICHMOND VA. 23237 804-743-9401 �rL�
TO. ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP ,AtL
O 27006 CUSTOMER: LEONHARDT
ADVANCE NCGI�J�
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
DATE OF REPORT 1/26/90 PAGE 2
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT BY. G N MACKIN
SAMPLE
lab
Nitrogen
Sulfur
Calcium.
Mag-
Sodium
Iron
Alurninurn
Manga-
Copper
Zinc
ArrvTxxiia
Nitrate
IDENr.
%N
pfxmrus
sium
%S
% Ca:
., nesium
%Na
ppm Fe
ppm Al
nese
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
Nitrogen
Nittognn
%P
%K
% M13
Ppm Mn
96
PPm
16
01374
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-.
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
iwerfiutilt
NO.
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm Ni
ppm Pb
ppm As,
ppm Hg
ppm Se
NiVogt�n
:96
.01374
.5
<5
10
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not he reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining
This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
our prior written authorization.
retained a maximum of thirty days after testing.
P 1 C.Hf��Ch�u�, Ph.D.
��
CULT�UAB� TORI , INC.
B�
Ll�'��C.
By
�—n
ONES�

ORTNUMBER
R024-086 Addition A G L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond Virginia 23237 •1804) 743-9401
gig'.
SAMPLES ACCT 45129
SEND ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP SUBMITTED
TO P O BOX 170 GROWER: LEONHARDT BY: G N MACKIN
ADVANCE NC 27006 RECEIVED FEB j z 19 {
E 2/8/90 PAGE 1 SOIL FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS (Ibs./A)
nf.,NLt
-----'
CROP
YIELD
AMENDMENT
.!
'yr
PZ05
-zO
Mg
Mo
LIME
LIME11
GYPSUM
€LIj1ENT�L
IUMBER
r. ; �� � t
,I, �: J �
�PfA pp
T(��1�/A
Tpf��/A
j.l�U 0 1
[ �) 7R0
PHOS
P07ASH
MAO-
tjtILFUF� :
SING
MANGA-
NE$E
IRON
COPPER
BORON
MOLY6
rij. , r:t
f!� q 7�rN• a
r�9 .. �. ,_
S �' t,
of n�ste,
.-i %
Eta i
:PRATE
3
NE¢IUM
DENUM
11
1.5
12
2.0
;
13
1: 5
14
1.0
15
1.0
16
2.0
F:
ARKS
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
recommendations are based on research data and experience, but NO GUARANTEE or WARRANTY expressed or Implied, concerning crop C. "mance is made. BY RMAN J ONES
Our repons and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made to the work. the results

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 29, 1990
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. WQ 000043.0
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County, NC
Dear Ms. Hovis:
Our records show that Permit No. WQ 0000430 was issued on
March 9, 1990 for the land application of sludge generated by
your wastewater treatment facility. The purpose of this letter
is to advise.you of the importance of the Permit and the
liabilities in the event of failure,to comply with the terms and
conditions of the Permit. If you have not already done so, it is
requested that you and other appropriate employees thoroughly
read the Permit.
The Permit sets forth specific performance standards,
operation and maintenance requirements, monitoring requirements;
including annual reporting and groundwater monitoring activities
to be performed by the Permittee, plus general conditions
applicable to non -discharge permits. Failure to comply with the
terms and conditions of the Permit subjects the Permittee to
enforcement action pursuant to Section 143-215.6 of the North
Carolina General Statutes. A civil penalty of up to $10,000 per
violation may be assessed for such violations.
Please note that the subject Permit expires on February 28,
1992. Part VI 11 of the Permit requires that a renewal request
be submitted at least six (6) months prior to expiration. Also
the Permit is non -transferable until such time that the Permittee
has requested a name change to the new Permittee.
As mentioned previously, the purpose of this letter is to
advise you of the importance of your Permit. Please read the
Permit and contact this Office at 704/663--1699 in Mooresville if
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, N.C. 28115 • Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Ms. Janice Hovis
Page Two
March 29, 1990
you have any questions or need clarification. We look forward to
providing any assistance.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
WAH:se

�NSIoN ENVIROMMENTAL R§ANRSE�� dy / V
t-v
vv �,l ' � aIOOAESVII '1
Stateiof North Carolina
` Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
V Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
March 9, 1990
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
In accordance with your application received August 18, 1989, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. WQ0000430, dated March 9, 1990, to City of Cherryville for the operation of
the subject sludge land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 1992, and shall
be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Issuance of this permit hereby
amends Permit No. WQ0000430 issued December 12, 1988.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 11666, Raleigh, NC 27604. Unless such demands are made this permit shall
be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. John
Seymour at 919/ 733-5083.
(Sincerely,
I n
George T. Eve ett
cc: Lincoln County Health Department
G�a�5Ston County Health Department
t,,Mooresville Regional Office
Environmental Waste Disposal
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
SLUDGE LAND APPLICATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Cherryville
Lincoln County
FOR THE
operation of a sludge land application program consisting of the land application of sludge from
the City of Cherryville's wastewater treatment facility to the sites which are identified in this
permit with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received
August 18, 1989, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 1992, and shall
be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The Mooresville Regional Office, phone no. 704/ 663-1699, and the appropriate
local governmental official (county manager/city manager) shall be notified at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the initial application of the sludge so that an
inspection can be made of the application sites and application method. Such
notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours
from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays. Also the Lincoln County Manager's office must be notified prior to the
initial application so that they will be aware that the operation has been initiated.
2. This permit shall become voidable if the soils fail to adequately absorb the wastes
and may be rescinded unless the sites are maintained and operated in a manner
which will protect the assigned water quality standards of the surface waters and
ground waters.
3. The land application program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a
non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastes resulting from the
operation of this program.

4. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
5. In the event that the land application program is not operated satisfactorily, including
the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall cease applying sludge to the
sites and take any immediate corrective actions, including the construction of
additional or replacement wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.
6. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
7. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and
18% for subsurface applications.
8. The following buffers zones shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet from residences under separate ownership for surface
application method,
b) 200 feet from residences under separate ownership for injection method,
c) 100 feet from "SA and SB" classified waters and public surface water
supplies for both methods,
d) 50 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes,
rivers, and surface water drainage ways for injection method.
e) 100 feet from "WS" classified waters and other streams, creeks, lakes,
rivers and surface water drainage ways for surface application
method,
f) 100 feet from property lines for both methods,
g) 50 feet from public right of ways for surface application method,
h) 10 feet from upslope interceptor drains and surface water diversions for
both methods,
i) 25 feet from downslope interceptor drains, surface water diversions,
groundwater drainage systems and surface drainage ditches for both
methods.
9. A copy of this permit shall be kept in all sludge transport and application vehicles
during the life of this project.
10. All sludges included in this permit must be stabilized by a process to significantly
reduce pathogens (as described in 40 CFR Part 257, Appendix II) prior to
application or incorporation. An evaluation of all sludges as specified in condition
II 4 must be conducted as to their ability to demonstrate compliance with this
requirement. A copy of this report must be submitted to the Assistant Chief for
Operations, Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section,
Operations Branch, PO Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687, within six (6)
months of the permit issue date.
11. Specific sludge application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site prior
to and during sludge application.
12. No sludge at any time shall be stored at any application site.
2

II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The facilities and disposal sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all
times.
2. A suitable vegetative cover as listed in condition II 3, shall be maintained in
accordance with the crop management plan approved by this Division.
3. The application rates shall not exceed the following for the specified crops:
ro PAN -Obs/acre/year)
Corn 150
Sudex 150
4. No sludges other than the following are hereby approved for land application in
accordance with this permit:
Estimated
Source County Permit No. Volume (gallons/year or dU tons/year)
Cherryville Gaston NC0044440 1,000,000 gal./yr. or 217 dry tons/ yr.
(see condition VI 13)
5. The lifetime. heavy metal loadings shall not exceed the following for the
corresponding Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC):
Parameter
CEC <
Lead (lbs/acre)
500
Zinc (lbs/acre)
250
Copper (lbs/acre)
125
Nickel (lbs/acre)
125
Cadmium (lbs/acre)
4.5
6. The Permittee shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in
responsible charge of the land application operation. The operator must hold a
certificate of the grade at least equivalent to the classification assigned to the
land application program by the Certification Commission.
7. Adequate facilities shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed or stored material into any surface waters.
8. Animals should not be grazed on sludge applied land within a 30-day period
following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing
shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access after each application.
Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced within twenty-four (24) hours
after application on lands with no cover crop established.
10. For areas that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation, sludge
may be applied during periods of dry weather. The sludge must be incorporated
into the soil within twenty-four (24) hours of application.
0

11. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application
sites during active site use and for the 12-month period following sludge application.
(Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.)
12. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
13. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or until 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency sludge disposal
measures must first be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
14. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge
application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5 provided a
sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, sludge and
soil mixture of at least 6.5.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, sludge, soil, or plant
tissue analyses) deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management
to insure protection of the environment will be established and an acceptable
sampling and reporting schedule shall be followed. If monitoring data indicates
minimal or no concern to the Division, reduction of monitoring requirements maybe
pursued after two annual reporting periods.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all disposal activities.
These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following
information:
a) source of sludge
b) date of sludge application
c) location of sludge application (site, field, or zone #)
d) method of application
e) weather conditions
fl soil conditions
g) type of crop growing on field
h) volume of sludge applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
i) annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of sludge, annual and
cumulative pounds/acre of each heavy metal, annual pounds/acre of plant
available nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied
to each field.
El

3. A representative annual soils analysis shall be conducted of each site receiving
sludge in the respective calendar year and the results maintained on file by the
Permittee for a minimum of five years. The soils analysis shall include but is not
necessarily limited to the following parameters:
Standard Soil Fertility Test Manganese
% Base Saturation
Cation Exchange Capacity
Phosphorus
Sodium
Potassium
Nickel
Lead
Cadmium
Zinc
Copper
Magnesium
Calcium
pH
4. A complete sludge analysis and EP Toxicity analysis shall be conducted by the
Permittee quarterly and annually, respectively and the results maintained on file by
the Permittee for a minimum of five years. If land application occurs at a frequency
less than quarterly, sludge analysis will be required for each instance of land
application. The sludge analysis shall include but is not necessarily limited to the
following parameters:
% total solids
Magnesium
Total Nitrogen
Sulfate
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cadmium
Chromium
Sodium
Calcium
Chlorides
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
pH
The EP Toxicity analysis shall include the following parameters:
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Endrin
Lindane
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
2,4-D
2,4,5 -TP Silvex
5. Two copies of all monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in conditions
III 1, III 2, III 3 and III 4 shall be submitted annually on or before January 31 of
the following year to the following address:
NC Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
5

6. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville, Regional Office
telephone no. 704/ 663-1699, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the land application program which results in the
land application of significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in
quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a discharge of
wastes to receiving waters.
c. Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the facility has
gone out of compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit
or the parameters on which the system was designed.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render
the facility incapable of adequate sludge treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting
sludge to the application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in
letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem
does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. Any groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the Division of
Environmental Management shall be provided.
2. No land application of waste activities shall be undertaken when the seasonal high
water table is less than three feet below land surface.
V. INSPECTIONS
The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the sludge storage, transport, and
disposal facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and
discharges which may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a
threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall keep an inspection log
or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations made,
and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This
log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of three years
from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request by the
Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
A

2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the disposal site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the land application activities are carried
out in accordance with the conditions of this permit and in the manner approved
by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to
change ownership or a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must
be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an
application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting
materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered
on its merits and may or may not be approved.
4. Prior to any transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
5. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreements between the Permittee
and the landowners/lessees are in full force and effect.
6. The following are approved sites and crops for sludge application (see attached
map):
Site No. Owner/Lessee Application Area (excluding buffers)
acres
1 John P. Beam, Sr.
12
2 John P. Beam, Sr.
10
3 John P. Beam, Sr.
12.7
4 John P. Beam, Sr.
28
5 John P. Beam, Sr.
12
6 John P. Beam, Sr.
17
7 John P. Beam, Sr.
26
8 John P. Beam, Sr.
20
9 John P. Beam, Sr.
13.5
TOTAL 151.2
7. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental
Management in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
7

8 . The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within
thirty (30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee
accordingly may cause the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as
specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
9. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
10. A set of approved documents for the subject project must be retained by the applicant
for the life of the project.
11. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall
request its extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review
the adequacy of the facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the
permit for such period of time and under such conditions and limitations as it may
deem appropriate.
12. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions,
limitations and monitoring requirements the Division of Environmental Management
deems necessary in order to adequately protect the environment and public health.
13. Land application activities conducted under this permit are limited to the land
application of 666,667 gallons per year or 145 dry tons per year until the permit is
amended to include additional lands.
14. Issuance of this permit hereby amends Permit No.WQ0000430 issued December 12,
1988.
Permit issued this the 9th day of March, 1990
NORTH CAROLINA
George T. Everett, D$
Division of Environm6
By Authority of the En
Permit No. WQ0000430
AL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
tal Management Commission
�'3

C.
CORA, op NAr
1A, Rc , v
�VB�p Y�L� � � L
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FE'S �1990
GROUNDWATER SECTION ®i,Sl,�v
February 23, 1990 y <.Fi,���(41E11F
MEMORANDUM!
TO: Don Safrit
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM: Bill Reid
SUBJECT: City of Cherryville
Amendment of Permit WQ0000430
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
WQ0000430/GW89340
(John Seymour: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit
application and recommends issuance of the permit with the following
conditions:
1. Condition No. 24 of the current permit should be changed to
read as follows:
Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by
the Division, shall be provided.
In a November 2, 1989 letter EWD stated that a three year
rotation is proposed for the subject land application program. The
letter also states that an additional 50.2 acres will be needed to
facilitate the three year rotation and that EWD will submit a permit
amendment request for the additional acreage within six months. As of
this date, this permit amendment has not been submitted. Therefore we
recommend that either a short-term permit (i.e. two-year) be issued or
that the annual total sludge application be limited to 163 dry tons.
JWR/MC/ja
cc : 973"Fbara RREM atiay
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

City o Chevzyville
116 South Mountain Street
•NORTH CAROLINA 28021
ECEI V 1� January 19, 1990. .
..=,SION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANA6E�E
,tent �2 1990
��RESVILL@
�610MAL t� .
Mr. Rex Gleason
N.E. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 905
Mooresville,.N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on.our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in November.1989
by Par Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
i
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:tr

4w
M LABORATORIES. PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
INCORPORATED 4400 OLD PINEVILLE ROAD
P. 0. BOX 240722
CHARLOTTE, NC 28224
704/527-7598
NOVEMBER 17, 1989
REFERENCE NO: 89 2664-2
MADE FOR: CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 SOUTH MOUNTAIN STREET
CHERRYVILLE, NC 28021
ATTENTION: RALPH CHILDERS, JR.
ANALYSES OF: WASTEWATER
MARKED: LAGOON
RECEIVED ON: 11/14/89
ANALYSES:
(mg/1)
Cd <.008
Fe .95
Pb <.05
CHLORIDES 165
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 1,612
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
OHN S. RICE
ABORATORY DIRECTOR

"Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
E EIVIED P.O. Box 170 • Advance, NC 27006 • [phone]
� 011 AE ENVIRONMENTAL MANASEMEM FAX: [phone]
DEC 2U9 1989
MOORESVILLE
( 40IONAL OFFICE
December 27, 1989
Mr. Randv Jones
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Amend Permit #WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Jones:
Enclosed you will find responses to the additional information
requested for the Cherryville land application program.
EWD, Inc. will.submit additional sites to be appended to the
Cherryville program in the first half of 1990. These sites will
provide the necessary acreage to allow for an adequate three year
rotation at an acceptable application rate.
A copy of Dr. Bob Rubin's draft report regarding the phosphorus
and sodium application rates is attached.
Please review this information and feel free to call with any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Grace Draman
President

Der -r
AGRICULTURAL
EXTENSION North Carolina State Uniuersit
SERVICE School of Agriculture and Life Science
Department of Biological and
Agricultural Engineering
Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695-7625
Telephone [phone]
Ms. Grace Draman, President
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
P. O. Box 170
Advance, NC 27006
Dear Ms. Draman:
Subject: Cherryvi-Ile Land Treatment Program
Mr. Randy Jones has several questions concerning the proposed project for
Cherryville. The two items of concern are the phosphorus loading and the sodium,
loading. Responses to these items are:
Item 2 - Phonhorgs Loadin
Phosphorus is an essential plant nutrient. Unlike many plant nutrients
which are very mobile in the soil system, phosphorus. generally adsorbs to the
cations or.positively charged particles present in the soil. Plants generally
utilize between 60 pounds of phosphorus per acre per year and 120 pounds of
phosphorus per acre per year. In addition to the rate of plant uptake, soils
can generally hold excessive levels of phosphorus. Adsorption studies have been
conducted which indicate that phosphorus can be stored at a rate of between 5,000
pounds per. acre and 20,000 pounds per acre in excess of uptake. Generally, the
higher the clay content of the soil, tie greater the phosphorus adsorption
capacity .of that soil. A phosphorus loading of 271.86 pounds per acre is
proposed for the Cherryville Project. This will be applied on a 3 year rotation.
This will load approximately 90 pounds of phosphorus per year. This loading can
easily be tolerated in these clay rich soils in the Cherryville, North Carolina
area. The land limiting constituent in this project does appear to be copper.
The per acre site life is calculated as:
125 lbslconner/ac
3.85 lbs-copper/ac/yr W 32.5 years
The volume of phosphorus applied in excess of uptake for this 32.5 year
period of time is calculated as:
32.5 application events x 171.86 lbs/phosphorus
excess per application event = 5584 lbs excess P
Clearly, this is well below the maximum that can be stored essentially
indefinitely in the clay rich soils on which the Cherryville sludge is to be
Cooperative Extension. Work in Agriculture and Honte Economics AdT and N.C. Stale Uniuersities,100 Counties and U S. Department of Agriculture

UCL—cl— OZ7 I"U 1"1-1J 11-1aHLL1CL' =M': 1'..0 iU71 ICL 111J•717/7JJ—✓J l—+ Hi O.J r✓J—
Ms. Grace Draman
Page 2
applied. Phosphorus is a concern, but the concern can be addressed through
careful management of the system.
Item 3
Sodium loadings at the Cherryville site are approximately 311.24 pounds
per acre or approximately 104 pounds per acre per year on a 3 year rotation.
This sodium will be offset by both calcium and magnesium which are present in
the waste sludge. Although the magnesium level does appear to be low and there
is no calcium value, reported, the high pH of the waste suggests that there is
calcium present to buffer the pH upwards. The impact of the sodium an the
exchange complex must be determined by soil testing following application events.
There is very little potential for any adverse impact following the initial waste
application events and soil sampling should be initiated within 3 to 6 months
following the initial waste application events to determine the percentage of
sodium which is present in the exchange complex on the waste receiver sites.
If the sodium level present on these, sites exceeds 10 to 15 percent of the total
exchange. complex available, then corrective action must be taken to mitigate the
potentially negative impacts of sodium. Typically, the sodium is mitigated by
Application of either gypsum (calcium sulfate) or a magnesium salt. The volume
of gypsum or magnesium required can only be determined following soil sampling.
It is a pleasure to work with you and the staff at Environmental Waste
Disposal. If you have questions or concerns regarding the contents of this
letter, please contact me at the letterhead address on the previous page. I do
look forward to working with you to see this project through to completion and
if I may be of further assistance regarding soil sampling,. please keep me
informed. It is imperative that a soil sampling program begin within 3 to 6
months of this waste, application event and it is imperative that the percentage
of sodium in the exchange complex is determined. The recommendations for gypsum
or magnesium can only be forwarded following this.recommendation.
Sincerely,
Oele"<--
A. R. Rubin, Extension Specialist and
Associate Professor
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
I1 z9M-

City ®f Chevzyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
November 14, 1989
RZ:CEIVEED
21L1&01y *F EN00*71'MENTAL thANAGEME"
N6V 16 1989
R100RESVILLE
Ik�rt�t
Rex Gleason
N.C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 905
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in July 1989
by E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:tr

J
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
---- CORRESPOND TO ----------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE ----------
EMS Laboratories, Inc N.C. Waste Lab Cert. No. 98 EMS SAMPLE : B16248
4132 Pompano Street N.C. Water Lab Cert. No. 37727 REPORT DATE : 07/26/89
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216 S.C. Lab Cert. No. 99011 DATE RECEIVED : 07/18/89
[phone] U.S. EPA id 00118 DATE COMPLETE : 07/25/89
REPORT TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
28021
-EF-WE-NZ
P.O. NUMBER : HOLD
DESCRIPTION
BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
28021
DATE : 07/17/89
TIME : 08:00:00
TEST DESCRIPTION METHOD DATE ANALYST
ANALYTE RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS
------------------------- -----------
................ ..... .. ....:.SM 407A 07/25/89 SRG
CHLORIDE ........... '�......... i': 85 1 MG/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT 180 C ..........,..EPA 160.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ............ : 900
ND - Not Detected
NA - Not Applicable
BDL - Below Detection Limit i
Sample was accompanied by chain of custody papers
0-1� e4 n►-,(A(y s;S lU be /4� C�—
07/20/89
10
MSD
MG/L
Approved by : cke,� rx,y& rMG Page 1 of 1

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CORRESPOND TO ----------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE
EMS Laboratories, Inc
4132 Pompano Street
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
[phone]
REPORT TO --
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
N.C.
Waste Lab Cert. No.
98 EMS SAMPLE
: B16797
N.C.
Water Lab Cert. No.
37727 REPORT DATE
: 08/25/89
S.C.
Lab Cert. No. 99011
DATE RECEIVED
: 08/10/89
U.S.
EPA id 00118
DATE COMPLETE
: 08/24/89
BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
i
-------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION ---------
LAGOON UNDERDRAIN
ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS ON SAMPLE B16248
P.O. NUMBER : HOLD
--------------------------------------------------------------
TEST DESCRIPTION METHOD
ANALYTE RESULT
---------------------------------------------------
7----------
CADMIUM, TOTAL ...... .�
... ,.EPA 213.1
CADMIUM, TOTAL ............... .0.02
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
IRON, TOTAL ..... ..............................EPA 236.1
IRON, TOTAL .................. . 12.8
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
LEAD, TOTAL ......................................EPA 239.1
LEAD, TOTAL .................. . 0.3
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP ................!...EPA 200.0
METALS, DIGEST ............... COMPLETE
INITIAL WT OR VOL ............ 50
FINAL WT OR VOL .............. 50
DATE :
TIME :
-------------------
DATE
ANALYST
DET. LIMIT
-------------------
UNITS
08/23/89
BW
0.01
MG/L
08/15/89
MK
0.5
MG/L
08/18/89 BW
0.2 MG/L
08/11/89 BW
NA NA
ND - Not Detected
NA - Not Applicable
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Sample was accompanied by chain of custody papers
Sample was not received properly chemically preserved for analysis requested.
Approved by : cke4y"uA ft Yb Twwa2em
Page 1 of 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
November 9, 1989
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain St.
Cherryville, N. C. 28021
R. Paul Wilms
Director
SUBJECT: WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Amend Permit No. WQ0000430
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
The Permits and Engineering Unit has completed a preliminary review of the information
submitted with your application.
The following item(s) must be addresed before we can complete our review. Please note
that these item(s) must be received by January 9, 1990, in order to prevent your project from being
returned as incomplete:
The Division recently received a letter from Ms. Grace Dramon of Environmental Waste
Disposal stating that her intention is to apply sludge to the land application sites on a three
year rotational basis. She stated that in order to operate in this fashion an additional 50.2
acres would be needed. She further stated that she would submit a request for approval of
these additional. acres within six months. In all likelihood when this permit gets issued, we
will limit the quantity of sludge that can be applied to the amount that can be associated with
the present acreage. When the future request is submitted, you can request that the permit
be appropriately amended.
2. The submitted report refers to application rates of phosphorus of 271.86 pounds per acre.
According to past conversations with Dr. Bob Rubin (Agricultural & Biological
Engineering at NCSU) the amount of phosphorus should be limited to 100 pounds per acre
per year. If you are aware of additional information on this subject, feel free to provide me
with it and/or to discuss it with me.
The submitted sodium application rate is 311.24 pounds per acre. It seems that this value
is also in excess of the agronomic rate. Please provide any supporting information which
would support the proposed loading rates.
Pollution Arevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me at 919/733-5083.
RECFEIVE0
DIVISION OF ENV.IRONIANTAI MANABEM£N O
NOV 13 1989
MOORESVILLE
AEOIONAL OFFIOB
CC. '.-Mooresville Regional Supervisor
Groundwater Section
Environmental Waste Disposal
Sincerely,
Randy Jones
Environmental Engineer

Date: October 18, 1989
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Lincoln
Permit No. WQ 0000430
PART I_ - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Cherryville Sludge Land
Application Sites
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
2. Date of Investigation: October 10, 1989
3. Report Prepared By: Allen Hardy, Environmental Engineer
4. Person Contacted: Grace Draman, Environmental Waste
Disposal; telephone number [phone]
5. Directions to Site: Please refer to report submitted by
Environmental Waste Disposal (EWD) for specific directions
to sites.
6. Discharge Point: N/A
Attach a USGS Map Extract an(f. i1ndicate_,treatment rla.n.t-si.'-c
and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F 13 NW
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There is
adequate land available for disposal of sludge.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The
topography varies from hilly (+15o slopes) to nearly level.
It did not appear that any of the sites were in a flood
plain area.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: There are some dwellings
located less than 300 feet from the disposal sites.
Applicable buffers should apply where necessary.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: N/A
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 45% Domestic
55% Industrial
a. Volume of Sludge: 15,000 gallons/acre
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: The
City of Cherryville currently has two (2) significant
industrial users: Travis Knits and Carolina Freight.

4..-4r.
Page Two
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: A sludge
analysis as submitted by EWD did not reveal any waste
constituents present in levels considered as being
toxic.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2. Production Rates (industrial aischarges only) in Pounds:
N/A
3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and
Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing):
N/A
5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Sludge will be
transported to the disposal sites in a sealed tanker truck
and then applied either by injection or surface application.
6. Treatment Plant Classification: N/A
7. SIC Code(s): N/A
Wastewater Code(s): N/A
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring requests: N/A
3. Additional effluent limits requests: N/A
4. Other: N/A
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant, City of Cherryville, proposes to convert
their application program from a one time only to a long term
program.
A total of approximately 151 acres were approved for the one
time application in the Permit issued on December 12, 1988. The
City has estimated the annual production of sludge to be
1,000,000 gallons of approximately 5.2% solids sludge or 217 dry
tons per year. The sludge is currently being stored in the
on -site lagoon.
The conditions and limitations set forth in the Permit
issued on December 12, 1988 for a one time application should
also apply in the long term program except condition No. 7 for
Field No. 1. As long as agronomic rates, lifetime loading limits
and the site life are not exceeded there do not appear to be any
problems with the conversion to a long term program.

Page Three
It should be noted that the "Agreement for the Land
Application of Waste Sludge on Private Land" signed by Mr. John
Beam, Sr. and Jr. is for a period of five years. It should also
be noted that the evaluations and recommendation in the Staff
Report written by Mike Parker, Mooresville Regional Office, on
November 30, 1988 still apply exdept for the part of condition
No. 7 mentioned above.
Pending review and approval from the ERG and the Groundwater
Section, it is recommended that the Permit be amended to allow
long term application and include any additional associated
conditions or limitations.
Signature of Report Preparer
A �, �11 � � �-
Water Quality Regional ,%ytpervisor

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 11, 1989
MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Reid
THROUGH: Brenda J. Smitho-
FROM: Jesse W. WellAb lt"'
RE: City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
GW #89340
Gaston County, N. C.
The City of Cherryville has requested that Water Quality Permit No.
0000430 be amended to allow the previously permitted fields be utilized in a
long term sludge application program. The applicant proposes to land apply
sludge at agronomic rates. This Office has no objections to the proposal
provided that all buffer requirements are maintained. It is recommended that
the following condition be incorporated into the permit:
Any groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by tree DepartnienL,
shall be provided.
The fields are primarily comprised of Cecil, Pacolet and Gaston Series
soils which should prove acceptable for long term application at agronomic
rates. I have attached a copy of the LeGrand analysis previously submitted.
Should you have any questions; please advise.
JWW:pb

State of North Carolina
Depaament of Environment, Health, and. Hateral Resources
Division of Environmental Isianagement
512 North Salisbtynf Street • Raleigh, Korth Qwohna 27611
James G. Martin, Gowrnor
'`¢jOam T. cobelf, Jr., Secretary
August 29,1989
Mr. A. R. Sharp, Courdy Manager
County of Lincoln
115 Vl. Main St., Citizen Center
Lhicolmon, N. C. 28092
R. P;ktd Vilms
Director
N. C. I)Lp-r. of NA
AND
c .. - . j •: I Y j)rV j-OPDfEN'r
oit�jG 0 1989
SUBJECT: Qb0001 WE yt I21311AL OFFICE
City of Cherry7ille
Land Application of Sludge
Lincoln County
Dear IVir. Sharp:
On August 18, 1989, the Division of Environrrentsl Management received an application
and supporting information for the land application of sludge from the City of Cherry�llle's
-1 astewater tfeatmew facilities to lands �7hich are localed in your goven nnental jurisdiction. 'These
lands are private agricultural lands which are owed by Mr. John Beam, Sr. (see enclosed iTrap).
This Division had previously issued a permit to the City of Chen- grille for the one-time application
of sludge to these sites. This request is tG issue a long term permit.
If you -would M..e tD offer comments on this project, please do so by September 15, 1989.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Rand} Jones at telephone
ntunber 91917 -5083.
Sincerely,
Tco-�
V
rtiiur Moubern E. 'Sver , , visor,
PO (—Permits and Engineering Unit
cc: Mooresville, Fegional Supervisor
.&IMF$ ,Ta#".n.FgYY
P.O. Box 2768?, Raleiglk. ITMILCamliva 276117687 Telephone [phone]
m6LlualOppoAarLityAffirwtire A,etioaZmployLr

I
HMO:
TO: R#' Gleasorkl r Bill Reid
Attached is a copy of the subr6tted information for the subject project.
Please provide comrnents.
Randy Tones
Pern its 8.1 Engineering
N. C. DEPT. Of NATURAL
AND
OFFICE/

Lk Environmental Waste Disposal, Ic:=
P.O. Box 170 Advance, NC 27006 _:• [phone]
FAX: [phone]

` d�.5rA7pa
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
d ti� i
4 t1
i• i � f•�
� Y i', �. is.
Dear i
ys R. Paul Wilms
Date: � lc t a � = � � r�. 19 It c � Director
J
SUBJECT: Application No. WQ ! (
i! T
The Divisions Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
materials on �� t 1 a '. 1 l� , 19 This application has been assigned the number shown above. Please
refer to this number when making inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to ti� i Ti. -+ --- ~ 1,C for a detailed engineering
review. A technical acknowledgement will be forthcoming. if this acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30)
days, please contact the engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Divisions regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the Regional Super-
visor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final 'action by.. -the Division.
If you have any questions, please call the review engineer listed above at [phone].
` RECEIVED
Sincerely
41y«N OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEM00
MOORESVILLE l Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
11tFE1ont o> 1 Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
cc: Regional Supervisor
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

-er ?
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and ,!CGmmunity Development
DEM USE ONLY
Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number:*
NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION*
G
, t'�
a
County: %" "•
In accordance with NC General Statutes Chapter 143, Article 21
i a£;St".) ',
Applicant (name of board, individual, or others): Application Date:
Project (name of city, village, town, sanitary district, establishment):
Uherryvi l l e, :.IC
FOR:
Brief Project Description:
❑ Non -Discharge Treatment/Disposal Facilities
❑ Pretreatment Facilities
_� tl`>C An f ca", ? o, UplC` � Y e only to
❑ Sewer Collection System (private)
c.C� evrax-t to Ion( a-or—m application
ED Extension of Sewer Systems (public)
ED Sludge Disposal
❑ Spray Irrigation
NATURE OF WASTEWATER:
❑ Domestic Sewage
0 Sludge/Industrial Waste
Estimated Completion Date:
El Other Waste
From (sewers, pretreatment plant): Serving"'(city;- insAtution, industry):
Into (name of treatment plant): Average Daily Gallons Sewage or Waste Flow:
At (location of plant): (NPDES No.)
? f1 NC00
Name and Complete
Address of Engineering Firm:;""V, ?'c3 -IaiC'19+ .1 VA LLILL ",; �?` �, . :� _ Tn.re Zip Code: %�7 0('C
n is, ,„ „ ?r, Telephone No. 01 ()°_C)r,P n.l f)11
Applicant assures that proposed works will be constructed, supervised, operated and maintained in accordance
with approved plans and specifications or approved changes thereto.
! _1 Mailing 1
Print Name:`�--1' ' Address: 1
Title: (yl,.�,�»zry; 17 _. Zip Code: ,•) ;' -
Signature: ::+,'r 1;r .� �— f;r -.' Telephone No.
INSTRUCTIONS: ,'I`-
1. Fill-in All Spaces. If not applicable, enter N/A.
2. Secure appropriate signature (mayor/city manager for municipality, chairman for sanitary district board,
owner/proper official of corporation, or legally constituted board or commission In charge of proposed works).
A letter of authorization is required from proper official if design engineer or other agent signs application.
3. Submit to Division of Environmental Management, Permits and Engineering Unit, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
the original and first copy of application, 3 sets of finalized plans, specifications and other supporting data as
ronuired by Cnmmiaeinn Rulaw_ and narmif fao-
FOR ASSISTANCE, CALL THE STATE CENTRAL OFFICE [phone], PERMITS 8: ENGINEERING UNIT, OR :
Asheville [phone] Mooresville [phone] Washington [phone] Winston-Salem [phone]
159 Woodfin Street 919 North Main Street 1424 Carolina Avenue 8025 N. Point Blvd.
Asheville, NC 28801 Mooresville, NC 28115 Washington, NC 27889 Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Fayetteville [phone] Raleigh [phone] Wilmington [phone]
Suite 714 Wachovia Building Box 27687 7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Fayetteville, NC 28301 Raleigh, NC 27611 Wilmington, NC 28403

Amendment Permit No. WQ 0000430
Acricultural Utilization - Land Application
Cherrsville. North Carolina
ECEi VeD
A U6 18 1989

of
a
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
P.O. Box 170 • Advance, NC 27006 -. [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Amendment Permit No. WQ 0000430
Agricultural Utilization - Land Application
Cherryville, North Carolina
The City of Cherryville was granted Permit No.
WQ 0000430 for the one time only application of sludge
from the City's WWTP. The City now desires to amend the
permit to facilitate a long term agricultural application
program for .the recycling of the sludge produced at the
plant.
A total of 151.2 applicable acres were approved for
application. The City estimates the annual production of
sludge to be.,.1,000,000 gallons per year of approximately
5.2% solids. sludge or 217 dry tons per year. The sludge is
stored'in the lagoon at the WWTP. The sludge will be land
applied on a once per year basis, and a representative
sample will be taken and analyzed prior to application and
the application rate determined to adhere to all conditions
and limitations specified in Permit No. WQ 0000430. (see
attached)
Mr. John Beam, Sr. and Jr. own and operate the site,
and you will note that the "Agreement for Land Application
of Waste Sludge on Private Land" is for a period of five
years.
A total of 1,313,000 gallons of sludge from the
Cherryville WWTP were applied to 103 acres in January of
1989. 1 have attached a copy of the metal and nutrient
loading sheets for your review.
Following is the estimated site life based on the
proposed annual application rate:
lbs./acre
Parameter
applied
Cadmium
0.0514
Copper
3.85
Nickel
0.2376
Lead
0.4001
Zinc
3.7375
lbs./acre
Estimated
allowable
Site Life/yrs
5*
97
125*
33
50*
210
500*
1,250
250*
67
*The allowable lbs./acre is a lifetime loading limit based
upon a soil CEC range of 0 to 5.
The sites contain Cecil, Pacolet and Gaston soil
series. These series are good candidates for sludge

Pg. 2
Amendment Permit WQ 0000430
Cherryville, NC
application. They are well drained and moderately
permeable and at least six feet to high water table. The
crops on these sites are corn and sudex. The crops and
soils will benefit from the application of sludge.
Please contact me immediately if you have any
questions or comments or if I can facilitate a timely
review of our request.
Respectfully submitted,
Grace Draman,
President

Q Environmental Waste Disposal, InG METALS RECORD
2799 Griffith Road
I Wiralon•Sakm, North Carolina VIOL
HER JC�h n1 VIA FIELD NO. NO. ACRES l/� PERMIT NO.
TOTAL GALLONS TOTAL DRY TONS COPPER ZINK LEAD NICKEL CHROMIUM MERCURY ARSENIC CADMIUM
eL ul ri /ln ec rd
it �
®®.
�
®���
� �'��:.��
�i 1
� •
• b �-
wmrfjm
won
®�
=41
LAND APPLICATION SPECIALISTS a
1ni
NUTRIENTS RECORD
N P K

QEnvironmental Waste Disposal, Inc. METALS RECORD
' 2M Griffith Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
r C�
INER �htJ R.E,,, t%A FIELD NO. s� NO. ACRES / PERMIT NO.
TOTAL GALLONS ; TOTAL DRY TONS COPPER ZINK LEAD NICKEL CHROMIUM MERCURY ARSENIC CADMIUM
n� u1 r- un ♦e Col
CC��CC
LAND APPLICATION SPECIALISTS a
SN3.
NUTRIENTS RECORD
N P K

QEnvironmental Waste Mposal,117G METALS RECORD
ZM Grit" Road
Wiruton-Salem, Honh Carolina ZrW
IH[p John! FIELD NO. 1 NO. ACRES PERMIT NO.
TOTAL GALLONS % TOTAL DRY TONS COPPER ZINK LEAD NICKEL CHROMIUM MERCURY ARSENIC CADMIUM
n� u. r, 14. As Cd
11111
mm
LAND APPLICATION SPECIALISTS
IA7
f'-R .
NUTRIENTS RECORD
H P K

eEnvironmental Waste Disposal, Inc. METALS RECORD
' V" cr" Road
Wingoo-Sakm, North Carolina zrW 0 r�
NEa Joh" jB"Al FIELD NO. v NO. ACRES (N PERMIT NO.
TOTAL GALLONS Y TOTAL- DRY TONS COPPER ZINK LEAD NICKEL CHROMIUM MERCURY ARSENIC CADMIUM
As Cd
SJN,
"'■�Cs�C��
CCU:
LAND APPLICATION SPECIALISTS
.IAl
I
NUTRIENTS RECORD
N P K

w S7Ar�
State of North Carolina
Department of' Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Sectary December 12, 1988 Director
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
SUBJECT: Permit No. WQ00!0430
City of Cherryville
Land Application: of Sludge
Gaston County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
In accordance with your application received September 21, 1988, we are -
forwarding herewith Permit No. WQ0000430, dated December 12, 1988, to the City of
Cherryville for the operation of the subject sludge land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contAined in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within 30 days following receipt of this permit. This request must
be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina
General'Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Unless such demands are made this
permit shall be final and binding.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications i:. being forwarded to you. If
you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Rosanne
Barona, telephone No. 919/733-5083, ext. 549.
Sincerely,
R. Paul Wi1ns
cc: Gaston County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Supervisor
Environmental Waste Disposal
Groundwater Section
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH
P E R M I T
For the discharge of Sewage, Industrial Wastes, or Other Wastes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes
of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Cherryville
Gaston County
FOR THE
operation of a one time application of approximately L,500,000 gallons of sludge
from the City of Cherryville's wastewater treatment plant to sites identified in
condition No. six (6) of this permit with no discharge to the surface waters of the
State, pursuant to the application received September 219 1988, and in conformity
with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed
and approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
3. This permit is not transferable.
4. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for the life of the project
5. This permit is valid for a one-time application of approximately 1,500,000
gallons of sludge.
6. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between the City of
Cherryville and Mr. John Beam, Jr. is in full affect, This agreement covers
fields No. one (1) through No. nine (9) with a total of 151.2 acres.

7. Field No. 1 shall not be used until March 1, 1989. Fields No. 2 and No. 3 shall
not be used until late Spring, 1989 and with approval from the Mooresville
Regional Office.
8. All buffer areas shall be marked with flagging prior to sludge application to
insure that sludge application is precluded from these areas.
9. Application rates shall not exceed.15,000 gallons per acre.
10. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to
insure surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable
sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
11. A suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintained.
12. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility
for damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this
facility.
13. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge
system to prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of
this facility.
14. No type of sludge other than that from the City of Cherryville Wastewater
Treatment Plant shall be placed on the land applicati�in disposal site.
15. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind er,_Psion and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
16. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or u::til 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Eitiergency sludge disposal
measures shall be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
17. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of 6.5 prior to sludge
application.
18. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
19. No liquid sludge shall be applied by subsurface injection within a 25-foot buffer
zone of any water course or surface drainage area.
20. In any future transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
21. A 50-foot buffer shall be maintained between drainageways, a 100-foot buffer
shall be maintained between each landowner's property lines, and a 400-foot
buffer shall be maintained between any residence and Amy applied sludge.
22. A recorded log of sludge applications including amounts applied, dates, method of
application, and site location shall be maintained by -the Permittee as a
permanent record.

23. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced in immediately after application
on lands with no cover crop established.
24. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the
Department, shall be provided.
25. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and 18%
for subsurface applications.
26. A 100-foot buffer shall be maintained between the appropriate land owner's
property line and any applied sludge.
27. No liquid sludge shall be surface applied within a 100-foot buffer zone of any
water course or surface drainage area.
Permit issued this the 12th day of December, 1988.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
`fit. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. WQ0000430

Table of Contents
I. Project Description & Method of Operation
II. Sludge Analysis and Proposed Application Rate
III. Site Evaluation & Land Application Agreement
IV. Maps
V. Soils Information

/4
a
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
P.O. Box 845 - Clemmons, NC 27012 - [phone]
Cherryville, North Carolina
A,&ricultural Utilization - Land Application
Project Description and Method of Operation
The City of Cherryville, located in Gaston County,
wishes to implement an agricultural utilization program,
through land application. for approximately 1.500,000 gallons
of sludge currently stored in a lagoon at the Waste water
Treatment Plant. The sludge analysis indicates that the
sludge will,offer beneficial nutrients and soil amenders
when applied to the land.
Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc. (EWD) has been
contracted by the City to design and implement this land
application program. EWD was formed in the agricultural
community and has over fifteen years a perience in land
application of agricultural, municipal. and industrial
sludges. Farmers participation and their satisfaction is a
key element .in the success of any land application program.
EWD's understanding and consideration of the farmers concerns
and needs is reflected in our growing list of satisfied
farmers. Following are the names and phone number of two
farmers who are currently participating in some of EWD's long
term land application programs in Forth Carolina:
Mr. Ron Hammonds
The City of Lumberton Project
919-'739-4973
Mr. Melvin Kiser
Fleischman's least Project
.704-629-3i96
Please feel free to contact the above farmers to verify EWD's
performance.
The sludge will be mixed and blended in the lagoon
prior to removal, to offer a consistent slurry. The sludge
will then be pumped from the basin into EWD's sealed tank
trucks for transport to the approved application sites.
Specialized application equipment will be used to apply
the sludge to the land at agronomic rates, through surface
application or injection, depending upon the crops (hay and
pasture) and permit requirements. If the sludge is surface
applied to crop land, the sludge will be incorporated within
48 hours of application.

Cherryville
Pg. 2
Application rates will be governed so as not to cause
puddling or the potential for run off. All buffer zones,
specifications and restrictions required by the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development governing land application will be strictly
followed.
The date, gallons applied, field number and the pounds
per acre applied of the required constituents will be
recorded on the attached form and copies of this information
will be given to the City of Cherryville and the farmer
within 30 days of application.
Based on the proposed application rate of 15,000 gallons
per acre, 100 acres will be required for application of the
sludge currently stored. Sludge analysis and proposed
application rates are attached.

10.)
Environmental Wade Disposal, Inc. METALS RECORD
V" Griffith Road
wratowSalem. North Carolina ZrW
OWNER FIELD NO. NO. ACRES PERMIT NO.
WAVAN r_errnuc i TOTAL DRY TONS COPPER ZINK LEAD NICKEL CHROMIUM MERCURY ARSENIC CADMIUM
LAND APPLICATION SPECIALISTS
rvn_In7
NUTRIENTS RECORD
N P K

PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
I 1CORPaRA1EO 4400 OLD PINEVILLE ROAD
aLP11
P. 0. BOX 240722
CHARLOTTE. NC 28224
704/527-7598
FEBRUARY 17, 1988
ANALYSES OF SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENTS
REFERENCE NO: 88 230
MADE FOR: CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN STREET
CHERRYVILLE, NC 28021
ATTENTION: RALPH CHILDERS, JR.
MARKED: P.O. #184
RECEIVED ON: 01/27/88
ANALYSES:
pH VALUE 7.3
(PPM AS RECEIVED)
TKN 1,232
N14%3 AS N 336
NO/2 10
NO/3 51
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 2,175
. A 1 294
As . 19
Cd .41
T-Cr 2.8
Cu 30.8
Hg <.01
K 394
Mg 179
Na 2,490
Ni 1.9
Pb 3.2
Zn 29.9
C % )
MOISTURE 94.8
TOTAL SOLIDS 5.2
ANALYZED BY:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

0
-A- LA80RATOR IES PAR LABORATORIES, "INC.
4q 1 IHCORPORA1 4400 OLD PINEVILLE ROAD MWP. 0. BOX 240722
CHARLOTTE. NC 28224
704 / 527-7598
FEBRUARY 8,1988
ANALYSES OF SLUDGE FOR EP TOXICITY
REFERENCE NO: 88 240
MADE FOR: CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S MOUNTAIN ST
CHERRYVILLE, N.C. 28075
ATTENTION: RALPH CHILDERS, JR.
MARKED: P.O. #184
RECEIVED ON: 01/27/88
ANALYSES:
pH VALUE
CORROSIVITY
REACTIVITY
FLASH POINT
IGNITABILITY
*ARSENIC
*BARIUM
*CADMIUM
*CHROMIUM
*LEAD
*MERCURY
*SELENIUM
*SILVER
*LINDANE
*ENDRIN
*METHOXYCHLOR
*TOXAPHENE
*SILVER
*2,4-D
*DETECTION LIMIT
ANALYZED BY:
l PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
•rL{r+ L�
WOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
7.3
NON CORROSIVE
NON REACTIVE
>200'F
NON IGNITABLE
(PPM)
<.5
<10
<.1
<.5
<.5
<.02
<.1
<.5
(PPM AS RECEIVED)
<.04 /
<.002
<.1
<.05
<.1
<i
RCRA LIMITS
2 - 12.5
NON CORROSIVE
NON REACTIVE
140' F
NON IGNITABLE
(PPM)
5.0
100
1.0
5.0
5.0
.2
1.0
5.0

Cherrvville. North Carolina
Agricultural Utilization Program
Proposed Anplication Rate
I
1,500,000 gallons @ 5.2% solids = 325.26 Dry Tons
3.25 Dry Tons per acre or 15,000 gallons per acre
Lbs. per acre Allowable
Parameter Applied lbs./acre
Pan inject 72.02
II Pan surface 51.03
{ P 271.86
I
h 49.4
Al 36.74
As 0.0237
Cd 0.0514 5*
Cr 0.35
Cu 3.85 125*
Hg 0.0013
IMg 22.37
Na 311.24
4 Ni 0.2376 50*
4 Pb 0.4001 500*
I_ Zn 3.7375 250*
*The allowable lbs./acre is a lifetime loading limit based
upon a soil CEC range of 0 to 5.

Site Evaluation Sheet
County: Lincoln
Owner. John P. Beam, Sr.
Operator: John P. Beam, Jr.
Address: Rt. 4. Box 473
Cherryville, NC 28021
Phone: [phone]
Predominate Soil Series: Cecil - Pacolet - Gaston
Predominate Soil Texture: sandy clay loam
Depth to water table: 6 ft.
Slope: 2-8%
ICrops:
Field
Total Acres Est.
Applicable Acres
Crop
1
14
12
Corn
2
10.4
10
Corn
3
13
12.7
Corn
4
31.2
28
Sudex
5
12.7
12
Sudex
6
19.1
17
Sudex
7
28.2
26
Sudex
8
22.8
20
Sudex
9
16.5
13.5
Corn
Total:
151.2
L
t

N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STANDARD
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION
OF WASTE SLUDGE ON PRIVATE LAND
j) NAME OF WWTP: �6LZ a� � WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
OWNER OF WWTP v
LOCATION OF WWTP
TYPE OF SLUDGE
l FARM NO.
FIELD NO.
LOCATION OF LAND n ,,
OWNER OF PROPERTY T
LESSEE OF PROPERTY
LAND USE OR CROPPING PATTERNSo
I'
INTENDED USE OR DISPOSITION OF CROPS_-*yed
The undersigned land owner or his'representative hereby permits the
i .+-I hereinafter referred
to as the Pe!dm ttee, Vo app y sludge from the 112,(pAA.44�/�
�+�A�-�••�-P�- Wastewater Treatment Plant uporl the land at the
location shown as described in the attached documents in accordance with
the restriction, stipulations and exceptions shown below. The landowner
or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient
value of the applied sludge while the Permittee receives, id consider-
ation, the use of the land described above for the disposal of digested
sludge. This agreement shall remain in effect for an -initial period of
(5) years. Following the initial
(�yaar period, this agreement shall remain in eff ct from one year to
the next year until cancelled as stipulated below. The undersigned land
owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the.
following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written
notification, given ninty (90) days in advance, modifies or cancels this
agreement.
`— RESTRICTION:

Pg. 2 SLUDGE APPLICATION AGREEMENT
(Continued)
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee,
County and State officials or their representatives to inspect each
parcel of property prior to, during, and after sludge application and
to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as
} required by the sludge disposal permit.
t 2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County
and State officials or their representatives to take necessary soil,
surface and ground water samples during the term of, and twelve (12)
months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will. provide each landowner or his representative with a
' copy of land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development (NCNRCD) Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of sludge application. The NCNRCD-DEM permit will
delineate maximum application rates, limitations and other restric-
tions prescribed by the laws and regulations.'
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with
information and data concerning the program for land application of
sludge to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of con-
stituents of the sludge, sludge application methods and schedules for
typical cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by
the Permittee for sludge application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a
copy of laboratory analysis stating constituents of the sludge prior
to the commencement of each sludge application.
6. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a
copy of the results of each soil analysis.
7. The landowner or his representative will be responsible for properly
liming the land to a pH of 6.5 before each application of sludge. The
PH of the land before and after the application of lime will be
determined in accordance with Stipulation 2 above.
8. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any
revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns
shown above at least twelve (12) months prior to each planting season
to endable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCNRCD
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will deter-
mine sludge application rates and schedules based on crop. patterns and.
the results of soil samples.,
9. No crops for human consumption shall be raised on the land for a
period of twelve months after sludge application.
10. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the
provisions of the Agreement for a period of twelve (12) months from
the date of'the most recent sludge application.
L

Pg. 3
STIPULATIONS:
SLUDGE APPLICATION AGREEMENT
(Continued)
11. The Permittee will exercise all reasonable.care and precautions in the
execution of this Agreement. The Permittee will not be held liable for
any damage to the property or persons in the execution of this
Agreement not due directly to negligence on behalf of the Permittee.
II 12. Should the landowner or his representative lease otherwise permit the
use of the land by a third party the landowner shall be responsible to
insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this
Agreement, to comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. In consideration of the signing of this Agreement, the parties thereto
for themselves, their agents, officials, employees and servants agree
not to descriminate in any manner on the basis of .race, color, creed or
national origin with reference to the subject matter of this Agree-
ment, no matter how remote.
15. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and
assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of
this Agreement.
16. The land application disposal sites shall not be grazed with thirty
(30) days after the last sludge application by any animals whose pro-
ducts (including their meat) is consumed by humans.
17. In any future transfer of the
notice shall be given to the new
to the sludge constituents,
incorporated at this site.
L_
NORTH CAROLINA
land where sludge has been applied, a
land owner that gives full details as
volume, etc. that was applied or
Soh• P Q c �.�+, sir.
124, t., 66X 403 CAerry-yillc
Land Owner or Lessee
Date

1 t 11 _i • f - f '''
3
\e� : - hlwy /8.1 SR I/0
�orth9eoalt ; —
/' BM 1014 •� �' �189-71
392
2}L,
.84
vKI-
:L ' ;� r�� � \ .�-• ' �7.10 H" It �V'. v /''�"" � P
LI COL . CO
GASTI2!
1
I \ 11 I'.' % _; 'Ii •
. 1637 II
Maiden s ,'1 ' r I ! =.! '
�► ''�� -' -'-�;- --- is . _.�:: 1 —V 1
u//tI
, Vale a ` to p r 1647 as r L I _ N..: C O
- , N
1RaeDsrilla • I o¢er �9Jt1 .; . /" — , �'f „ i '
i. dsonrille tri,n
Istan
321
ten Slhoala
' ble Cherryville , luua �q•. - 1 1 _
6c j _ ) Wa I)
\ ` 7 .."ley t ,.,n,, ,� / / �••.`
ems_ _ I tubby 9 "mer6 7 o y�c �� e 5 'r✓ `:�~ ,a+ '' •� ~ �' ..ti j � 1
Kings" ) Ci • • op� , �J^,' - _\ ,: o+,l a
Mou
1077 ti•. t Pa son ,. • .r':' ¢ 7 • '�� i• 1 r.: `/' .z it
_ � t �' emu• ((''�� ` ..
� �Ia lrton � \ � / ': I _ • . K;` i � V,� l'. ''7x,• f 22 I I us oo!a
•:�! I ror raM. u 7s p I: :�� .
�� I.R. •V � '
Location Ma
��;(, John P. Beam, Sr.

b O pi-c
A �A
•
zw
l.f
f,7
lk.
Ll-

���q.. Iry jF�uf ` � ti��� 1 •���- •• -
• may,- !.�. +ik
H rt-•• .�,,',� L �' t• 4
,.-� • r'" ' �.. •• • 1 � •• ram'„•[ - _ r �l�l � ��:yz� • � �� jr•• r,� l 1. �r a t; •
..' ! !� ^..• Imo.. •1 1••� � I�H J 4 • ! �� � ,'�•�.. -
yy�: s,'"]l. j k 'y' ii�'' p4 - trs, _? �. •�...C'fi-Y(�,,r•.+..
+i,.r 9�; t ;,Q t5�•� 'P.y�, _yam t}�.•-. }ka�'
��it•'4.r'¢ t�� "`` • 'Cv�� A `�f: -ix+��
cw :{r2't �• J>•r ! - ;i ]i -}4j"
.. r.,l. • x Ot -r � r� r„ [✓} P `� ry.•,twrT -re ,(��
.E�: �� t ♦ t C. �T``'' �' frr. +�•;ic" "'M { }F. �.{tFi4 t
'7is +'t rr� V _.fir '^�O'a f" y�C -,� •t
" � / _.f '�'•a L.r'a '+-.. �t i� Ik �� ��'_. r .i_]4•Y f�r-. :Y�i►'.r `•k t�:+i
i.; � r �•r �•is ��.• •'�,,,'T •,. t• �, Z �..; ..k.,,ti. �F.X _s �. c r +�,
t - •r ��•'' �M�4 � •- V•y" t- t? vt ,� w=. • �• -i ��T+'` +at
' r
Er -
r ;
••V

Qn
-47
/xAg"n
36F
4
UN
V%
(00
f' 1 - �� - W
0
Itzb
.75
bY r.
Sit e Ma-o
John P. Beam, Sr.

N
I=
cn
P.. 'o
C.)
f
0
Ln
c;
N
OR
rs
ffi (LINCOLNTON WEST)
4754 IV NE

UMM

OIL IDEPiT1FIC=ATIC_N _EtaEND
I L I ti c_ CL14 COUNTY, N! RTIA CAROLINA
JANUARY, 1'
544A
AaA
Altavista sandy I c-am, 0 to Z' percent slopes,
rarely
36B
(57B)
ApB
App I i n3 sandy I clam, 1 to 6 percent s I apes
i u
);nP.
Buncombe sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, rarely
7
f I o v d e d
3311_?
Cc
Cec i I sandy loam, 2 to := percent slopes
313'
(31B,
CeL?�
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to :_ percent slopes,
i
25B)
eroded
4
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to Z percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Z3E
Ga.0
Gaston loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
2322
(23B)
GnBZ
'Gaston sandy c.lay loam, t to B percent
slopes, eroded
�3D2
(231))
GnD2
Gaston sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
-
slopes, eroded
483
(463)
GrC
Geor3ev.ille loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
48D
(46D)
Gr
Geor3eville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
43E
(46E)
GrD
Geor3eville loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
- 4982
GVB2
Geor3eville clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, eroded -
49DZ
GvDZ
Geor3eville clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes, eroded
593
(41B,
HeB(HuB)
Helena sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes .
9B)
37E
(37F)
MaD(MaE)
Madison sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes '
37BZ
(373)
MdB2
Madison:sand clay !oam 2 to 8
Y Y... percent
-s I opes,' eroded
-:27D2
(37D0
MdC2
Mad ison ...gandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
-
s I opes, eroded
5403
MsB
Masada sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slo es
P P

n.co I n
January
County Le3end
l+
I
1 *88
Pa3e 2
Field
Publication
Symbr., 1,
Symbol
Map Unit Name
I'
54()D
MsC
Masada loam, 8 to 15
sandy percent slopes
34L-'
Pal= (Pcrq)
Paco i et sandy loam, 2 to 1 percent slopes
34D
PaC(Pc()
Paco I et sandy loam, : to 15 per -cent slopes
3':=E
PaD
Pace I et sandy loam, 15 to Z5 percent slopes
32'F
PaE
Paco I et sandy* I oarn, -25 to 45 percent 's I opes
f'
3'2Ls2
PeBZ
Paco I et sandy clay loam, 2 to 3 percent
slopes, eroded
I32D'Z
(31D, PeCZ
Paco 1 et sandy clay loam,. 8 to 15 percent
3ZD,Z5D)
slopes, eroded
—?B (3B)
Pmr,
Pacolet-Madison-Urban land complex, 2 to 8
--�
percent slopes
es o
P P
ZD (31))
PmC
Pacolet-Madison-Urban land complex, 8 to 15.
percent slopes
Qu
Pt
Pits, quarries
3513
• RnB
Rion sandy
a y loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Li
36D
RnC
Rion sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
1
RvA(CoA)
Riverview loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
_
occasionally flooded :
513
SeB
Sedgefield fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent
slopes
Uo
Ud
Udorthents, loamy".' -
6
Ur
Urban land
5013 (6313) WnB
Winnsboro fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent
`
sl pes
o _
WoA
Worsham fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent :,,.." `'::•'
_ -slopes
_ y°�..,:,.=::`�•��-�,;
Z ion-Mocksv i I 1 e•''S`omp I e4. to 45 perceri't
•25
slopes
r -

County Legend
I January
Page
Field Publication
Symbo I Sy m b o I
GSB' 'LwC
63E ZWD
' l
I '
Map Unit Name
Z i ,gin-W i nnsbc,r-i-Mi}cttsv i I le complex, 3 t4 15
percent slopes
Zi 4n-Winnsboro-Mocksv i I le complex, 15 t4 2`5
parent slopes
T••- ..r..
.r
E. _
.f.
Vc.Ti r
-
��
I 'jam'
�:t<'
- • l'

Established Series
Rev. REH:HJB
3/84
CECIL SERIES
The Cecil series consists of well drained moderately permeable
soils that formed in residuum weathered from acid crystalline
rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 25
percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Hapludults.
TYPICAL PEDON: Cecil sandy loam --forested.
(Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise
stated.)
01--2 to 0 inches; very dark grayish brown (2.5Y 3/2)
partially decayed leaves and twigs. .(0 to 3 inches thick)
A--O to 2 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) sandy loam;
weak medium granular: structure; very friable; many fine roots;
strongly acid; clear wavy boundary:. (2 to 5 inches thick)
E--2 to 7 inches; brown.(7.5YR 5/4). sandy loam; weak medium
granular structure; very friable; many fine and medium roots; few
pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; clear_smobth boundary. (0 to
I 10 inches thick)
BA--7 to 11 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/8) sandy clay loam;
I weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine and
medium roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (0 to 8
inches thick)
IBt1--11 to 28 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate medium
subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thick
distinct clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of"mica;
few small pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary. (6 to 24 inches thick)-
Bt2--28 to 40 inches.; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate and
weak medium subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic;
thin clay films on faces of pods; few to common fine flakes of
mica; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary. (10 to 28 inches
thick)
BC--40 to 50 inches; red (2.5YR 5/8) clay loam; common
medium distinct strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) mottles; weak medium
subangular blocky structure; friable; few clay films on vertical
faces of peds; common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary. (7 to 22 inches thick)
C--50 to 75 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 5/8), strong brown
(7.5YR 5/8), and pale brown (10YR 6/3) saprolite of gneiss mixed
with clay loam; massive; friable; common fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid.

CECIL SERIES CONTINUED
TYPE LOCATION: Catawba County, North Carolina; 5 1/4 miles
southeast of Newton, North Carolina, on NC 16; then south on
Maiden Road, Highway 1810, for 3/4 mile; 1/4 mile west on Farm
Road, 25 feet NE in wooded area.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Thickness of the clayey Bt horizon
ranges from 24 to 48 inches and it extends to a depth of 30 to 60 _
inches below the surface. Depth to bedrock is greater than 6.5
feet and ranges to 10 feet or more. The soil ranges from very
strongly acid to medium acid in the A horizons and is strongly
acid or very strongly acid in the B and C horizons. Content of
coarse fragments of gravel and cobble size range from 0 to 20
percent by volume in the A horizon and 0 to 10 percent by volume
in the Bt horizon. Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica
in the A and Bt horizons and few to many flakes of mica in the BC
and C horizons.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of' 2.5YR to 10YR, value of 3 to 5,
and chroma of 2 to 8. The E horizon, where present, has hue of
7.5YR or lOYR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. -The A
horizon is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, or their gravelly
analogues. Eroded phases are sandy clay loam or clay loam.
The BA horizon, where present, has hue of 2.5YR to 7.5YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is sandy clay loam, loam, or
clay loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1OR or 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5, and
chroma of 6 or 8. Hue also ranges to 5YR if evident patterns of
mottling are lacking in the Bt and BC horizons. Mottles that are
few and random are included. The Bt horizon is clay loam or clay
and contains less than 30 percent silt. The BC horizon, where
.present, has hue of lOR to 5YR, value of 4 or 6, and chroma of 4
to 8. Mottles in shades of yellow or brown are few to common in the BC horizon of some pedons.
The C horizon is loam, sandy loam, or sandy clay.loam, and
dominantly reddish and ranging to brownish, grayish or white soft
saprolite of acid crystalline rock.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Appling, Aragon, Cataula
Chestatee, Georgeville, Hulett, Kolomoki, Madison, Nankin, _
Pacolet,.Spotsylvania, and Wedowee series in the same family.
-Those.in closely related families are the Braddock, Cataula,
Cullen, Hayesville, Herndon, Hiwassee,'Mayodan, Mecklenburg, and
Tatum series. Appling soils have dominant hue of 7.5YR or
yellower and hue of 5YR with evident patterns of mottling in a
subhorizon of the Bt or BC. Aragon soils contain fragments of
L

1
1
1
CECIL SERIES CONTINUED 3
chert and have a C horizon of cherty limestone. Braddock and
Hayesville soils are mesic. Cataula soils have a fragipan.
Cataula soils have a brittle BC horizon. Chestatee soils contain
more than 15 percent by volume of coarse fragments throughout.
Cullen, Mecklenburg, and Tatum soils have mixed mineralogy. In
addition, Tatum soils have more than 30 percent silt.
Georgeville and Herndon soils contain more than 30 percent silt.
Hiwassee soils have value of 3 or less to depths of 40 inches.
Hulett, Nankin, Spotsylvania, and Wedowee soils have a Bt horizon
in hue of 5YR ur yellower. In addition, Nankin and Nectar soils
have a C horizon of stratified Coastal Plain sediments. Kolomoki
soils are on stream terraces and have sandy
C horizons. Madison and Pacolet soils have thinner Bt horizons
and, in addition, Madison soils have a high content of mica.
Mayodan soils have mixed mineralogy.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Cecil soils are on nearly level to steep
Piedmont uplands. Slope gradients are 0 to. 25 percent, most
commonly between 2 and 15 percent. These soils have developed in
weathered acid crystalline rocks. Average annual precipitation
is about 48 inches. Mean annual soil. temperature is about 59
degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing
Appling, Cataula, Chestatee, Cullen, Hiwassee, Madison,
Mecklenburg, Pacolet, and Wedowee series these are the Durham,
Louisburg, Rion, and Worsham series. Durham, Louisburg; and Rion
soils contain less clay and Worsham soils are poorly drained. In
addition, Louisburg soils do not have a continuous argillic
horizon.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; medium to rapid runoff;
medium internal drainage; moderate permeability.
USE A14D VEGETATION: About half of the total acreage is in
cultivation, with the remainder in pasture and forest. Common
crops are small grains, corn, cotton, and tobacco
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Piedmont area of Alabama, Georgia, North.
Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is of large
extent, with an area of more than 10,000,000 acres.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Cecil County, Maryland; 1899.
REMARKS: This revision uses a relationship between the thickness
of the clayey Bt horizon and depth below the surface that this
horizon extends as criteria for differentiating the series from
Pacolet. Also, it includes those soils of 5YR hue that are free
of evident patterns of mottling as a subhorizon of Bt or BC.
ADDITIONAL DATA: (1) McCracken, R. J. editor: Southern
Cooperative Series Bulletin 61, issued

CECIL SERIES CONTINUED 4
January, 1959, Virginia Argicultural
Experiment Station, Blackshiirg, Virginia.
(2) Engineering data in:
Soil Survey or Iredell County, North
Carolina, issued 1964. -
Soil Survey of Yadkin County, North
Carolina, issued 1962.
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U. S. A.

NCOOl1 $01 L I NTERPRETAT 1 OHS RECORD
MLRA(S): 136, 148
REV. RAG,EiN, 7-67
TYPIC MAPLLDULTS, CLAYEY, KAULINITIC, THERMIC
CECIL SERIES
THE CECIL SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL TNtAIMED NEARLY LEVEL TO STEEP SOILS ON PIEDMONT UPENDS. TYPICALLY THESE SOILS HAVE A
SANDY LOAN SIIRFACE LAYER ABOUT 7 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL IS DOMINANTLY RED CLJY AID CLAY LOAN 43 INCHES THICK- THE
UNDERLYING PATEN" IS MULTICOLORED, LOAMY SAPROLITE OF FELSIC CRYSTALLINE RM. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 25 PERCENT.
1
IOEP FW�CT)PEHCfA - I
I(IN.)1 USDA TEXTURE 1 UNIFIED I AASHTO 1 3 INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE M. I LINIT ITICITYI
1 0-7 NCR-SL. CA-L, GR-FSL ISM, CM
IA-i:
A-1-6
1 S-1SIi0-95 55-85 1-0-75
13-30 1
22 INP-4 I
1 0-7 ISCL. CL
ISM, SC, CL, ML
IA-4,
A-6
1 0-5 175-100 75-100 66-95
38-91 1
21-35 1 3-15 1
1 7-1113CL, CL
ISM, SC, ML, CL
IA-4.
A-6
1 0-5 175-100 75-100 68-95
38-41 1
21-35 1 3-15 1
- III -SOIL, CL
-Amp ML
IA-7,
A-5
1 0-5 197-100 92-100 72-99
55-95 1
41-M 1 9-37 1
I50-751VAR
I
I
1 1
I
f 1
IGEPTATL'OIY
1(IN.)1(PCT)l DENSITY
H BILITY IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MIWS/CMII
SWELL IFACTORS IEROD.IMATTER I
1
I
i 0-7 I S-ioii:i0-i:6o i i:o-c:o i o:ii-O:o9 ii:s-6:o i - i Toil i:isi + i _i°:s-i i
1 0-7 120-3511.30-1.50 1'0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15 14.5-6.0 1 - 1 LOW 1.281 3 1 - 1..5-1 1
1 7-11120-3511.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15 14.5-5.5 1 - 1 LOW 1.281
111-50135-7011.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.13-0.15 14.5-5.5 1 - 1 LOW 1.281
SANITARY FACILITIES (B) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 16)
I - : - ERGS S - 5CiATm-um-STRERC I
ISEPTIC TANK 1 1-15%: MODERATE-PFJtGS SLOWLY,SLOPE 11 ') 15-25%s FAIR -LOIN STRENGTN,SLOPE
1 ABSORPTION 1 15+N: SEVERE -SLOPE 11 ROADFILL 1 1
1 FIELDS 1 11 1 1
1 11 1 1
1
1 SEWAGE
1 2-7%s NOOERATE-SEEPAGE.3LOPE
- 1
11 ( 1
I LAGOON
1 7+Ws SEVERE -SLOPE
11 SAND I t
I AREAS
1
11 I 1
1
I1 I 1
1
=
1
1 SAH17ARY
1 8-15%s HOOERATE-SLOPE,T00 CLAYEY
11 1 I
1 LANDFILL
115+Ns SEVERE -SLOPE
11 GRAVEL I 1
(TRENCH)
1
I -
I
11
11
1-�FRI
SLIGRI1
- -
_ 1 SANITARY
1 8-15%z MODERATE -SLOPE
: - 11 " I POOR -TOO CLAYEY.SLOPE t
1 LANDFILL
115Ns SEVERE-SIDPC
.tSN: ..•.:_ .:_..`
11 TOPSOIL ` I
I (AREA)
I
II 1 I
ill,
I I I 1
I DAILY
1 8-15%, FAIR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE,IIARD TO PACK
11 WATER MANAGEMENT (5)
1 COVER FOR
1 15+N:•POOR-SLOPE
11-u-3%: - I
LANDFILL
I -
I1 "FTRD 1 3-6%: MODERATE-SEEPACE,SLOPE 1
-I
I1 PESERVOIR I BNs SEVERE -SLOPE 1
11 1,AREA'" I: 1
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
11 I
I SHALLOW
1 8-15Ws MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY.SLOPE
IIEHBAHXHENTS 1 I
- IEXCAVAT10115
I
1 15+%, SEVERE -SLOPE
..
11 DIKES AND 1 I
1
I
11 - LEVEES . '. I ,.
I
11 1
I I I bEVERE-NO1
1' DWELLINGS
1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
I I - EXCAVATED 1
_ I WITHOUT
PAS+W: SEVERE -SLOPE
y' II- PONDS
I BASEMENTS
1 __._ ..._
:' I IAOUIFFR FED I •
.
_ 1
I
II I 1
DWELLIIICS
1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
1
11 1 1
I WITH
1 15Ns SEVERE -SLOPE
11 DRAINAGE 1 1
I BASEMENTS
I
1
I
11 1 1
11 1 I
1
1 SMALL
1 0-46%: bLOW11
1 4-8%: MODERATE -SLOPE
11 1- s 1
11 1 3+%: SLOPE I
I COMERCIAL 1 110t SEVERE -SLOPE
11 IRRIGATION I 1
1 BUILDINGS
I
1
1
1I
PH:-
II I I
- :
I LOCAL
1 8-15%: MODERATE—SLOPE.LDW STRENGTH
II TERRACES 18+%s SLOPE I
I ROADS AND
1 15+%- SEVERE -SLOPE
11 All I 1
STREETS
1
11 DIVERSIONS 1
I
I
11 I 1
1 LAWNS,
r r• r=
1
ILANDSCAPING 1 8—M SL.FSL,L,SCL,CLs HOOERATE-SLOPE
11 GRASSED 18+%s SLOPE I
1 AND GOLF
1 0-8% CR: MODERATE -SMALL STONES
11 WATERWAYS I 1
I FAIRWAYS
1 8-15% GR: NOOERATE-SMALL STOHES,SLOPE
11 I 1
1
l
• 1
1 154%: SEVERE-SLOPEREGIONAL iNlLkPHLlAilUM
I
II P I
1
I ,

CECIL SERIES MCO01s
1 u-o� x.ro�.F-.xi.wi XllJtl
11
1 u'[�' x.f x.L.�(l,LL: MUUtXA1E-.WALL .NUMB 1
1 1 S-15% SL.FSL.L.SLI.CL: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
1 2-6% SL,FSL.L SCL.CL: MODERATE -SLOPE 1
I CAMP AREAS 1 154% SEVERE -SLOPE
IIPLAYGIOtOn 1 6-% SL.FSL L 3,CLI SEVERE -SLOPE I
1 1 0-6% GI: MODERATE -STALL STONES
11
1 0-6% GRt Si RE -SMALL STONES 1
I 1 6-1S% Gilt MODERATE -SMALL STONES SLOPE
1
11
1 6+14 CRt SEVERE -SLOPE SHALL STOM I
.
i 1 ®-IS% SL.FSL.L,SCL.CL: MODERATE -SLOPE
11
PAnts
1 1
11S-25%t MODERATE -SLOPE I
IPICHIC AREASI 1541%1 SEVERE -SLOPE
11
AND
1 I
I 1 0-6% GRt MODERATE -STALL STONES
11
TRAILS
1 I
1 1 4-15% G1t MOOERATE-SNALL STONES SLOPE
II
1 1
1—CLASS-
I DETERMINING 1 BILITY I I LINT
1
—ice
TURE I
I I ILECL"E MAY 1 1
1 PHASE 1 1 (Bll I LBS)
1
BU
1 (ell) 1 LBS 1 (T016 1 AUI 1
I I
I
IU-6% 5L,FSL,L,GR1
16-10� SL.FSL.L,GR 1 3E 1 1 90 1 1 700 1
1 D3
1
1 30 _1 12000 1 .1 3.0 1 1 7.3 1 1
I10-15% SL,FSL.L,CR I. ;E 1 1 so 1 1 600 1
1 73
1
1 25 1 119M 1 1 I.3 1 1 7.0 1 1
I15-25% SL.FSL.L.CR 1 GE 1 1 70 1 1 S00 1
1 60
1
1 20 1 11900 1 1 2.6 1 1 5.5 1 1
12-61 S0..CL,EROOED 1 3E 1 1 70 1 1 500.1
1 70
1
1:25 1- 1 ..- 1- 1 2.4 1 1-3.3 1 1
16-10% SCL.CL.EROOED 1 4E I 160 I I- I
1 60
1
1- - -I 1- 1 1.2.2 1 1 5.0 1 1
110-25% SCL,CL,EBODED 16E I I- I I- I
I-
I
I- I i.- 1 1. 1.8 1 14.5 r 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 f l r 1 1 (
1
I
r I I 1 1 1 1 I I
1 I
1.
1
1, .. I- _. I_... I L I I ­ I I
IF %IF
I
1 DETERMINING
ISYNIER05"RTFWW.1
I TREES TO PIAHT
1 .
I PHASE
1 (NA2AROILINIT IMOR7'Y111AZARDICONPETI
IINOXICLASI
I -
_ ... I U-15% 3L,tbL.L,LR
I BA15LIGHT15LIU1115LIUIIIS=IIMUtX ILUBLULLT FINt
180 *1. 3
1 LUULULLT F I KE
I
115-25% SL,FSL.L,CR
I BRIMODER.IMOOER.ISLICHTISLIGHTIMODER.ISHORTLEAF PINE
169 •1 B
ISLASH PINE
I
1
l I I I'. -. I I IVIRGINIA PINE
In •1 B
YELLOW -POPLAR
1
1 I 1 I I r 1BLACK OAK
167 1 3
1
1
I
I I 1 1 t r IORTHERN RED*OAK
lee •1 %
I
I
1 __.... _... __.._..
1. 1. : r.„-I 1 T . ( -[POST OAK
163 13
1°....,
1
1 1 1 l I I ISCARLET OAK
165 1 3
1
1
I
I 1 1 1" I I [YELLOW -POPLAR
192'*1 6
1
10-15% SCL,CL,ERODED
1 7CISLICHTIMODER.IMOOER.ISLIOHTISLIGITILOBLOLLY PINE
172 1 7
ILOBLOLLY PINE
I
113-25% SCL,CL,EROOED
17RIMOOER.ISEVEREIMOOER.ISLIGITISLICHTISHORTLEAF PINE
166 1 7
ISLASH PINE
1
1 ::
1. L. 1. 1 ..1 r IVIRGINIA PINE
163 *1 7
-1
1
I
I 1 I 1 1 I ISLACK OAK -
1- I•—
I
I
1
1 1 1 1, 1 1 [NORTHERN RED OAK
1- :1
U; ...
1
I
I I I I I I MOST OAK
1- I-
I
1
1
I r I 1 I I ICCARLET OAK
I- 11
I
1
( _
1 -
1 1 ( I I I I t
I DETERMINING
1 PHASE
I SELD
ILECUME I HERB. 1 TREES IPLANTS I
IPLANTS I RATER !MILDLF INILDLF IMILDLF I
Ig-(,% bL,t5L.L,GK
16-IS% SL,FSL.L,(M
I COW
I FAIR
I Emmm
1 GOOD
I COW
I COW
I COW
V GOOO
I COW I-
I COW r
- IV. POORIY. POORI GOOD
I GOOD
TV. POORI
I15-2S% SL,FSL.L.CR
1 POOR
I FAIR
I GOOD
I GOOD
1 0000 I
- IV. POORIV: POORI FAIR
I COW
IV. POORI
10-6% SCL.CL.EROOED
I FAIR
I GOOD
I COOL
I GOOD
r 0000 I
- IV. POORIV. POORI GOOD
I GOOD
IV. POORI
16-15% SCL,CL.EROOED
1 POOR
1 FAIR
-I FAIR
1. FAIR
.L FAIR A
._- ._..IV. POORIV. POORI FAIR
I -FAIR
IV. POORI
115-2S% SCL.CL.ERODED
IV. POORI POOR
1 FAIR
I FAIR
I FAIR I
- IV. POORIV. POORI POOR
I FAIR
TV. POORI
It
ILOLF I
- i
1
- 1
I COVION PLANT HAMS I SYMBOL I
1
IFLOWEIIING. DOCWOOO I CDFL2 I 1 f
1
1
[
IAMERICAN HOLLY I [LOP 1' 1 1
1
I
1
IPAWPAW _ I ASTR I 1 I
1
1
I
_.._-..•IFARKLiBEItRY ------ ,. .- _ 1 VAAR l 1 ._.. 1. _.. .._. ..,
I
- [MUSCADINE GRAPE I VIR03 1 I 1
I
1
I
Istow I RKm+ I I
IREDPURPLE DEEBAL„ I HOm, f I 1
I
1
I
IMJtXBFRRY I RIBI15 I I 1
I
I
I
v1. IPERSIMION ., .- I DIV15 .-._1 I. _ 1
1
I.
ISOURWOOD I.OXAR I 1 1
I'
I
i
IBIACIc GERRY I PRSE2 11 1
f
1
IEASTERM HOPHOR KAN 1 OSVI 1 I 1
I'
I
1
IAHERICAN PUN I PRAM I. 1 I
I
1
I
ICOM1pN TRIIHPETCREEPER I CARA2 I I (
[
r
1
1 : 1
t
1 FAVORABLE YEARS 1
I
1 NORMAL YEARS
I UNFAVORABLE YEARS
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST CATA OF it PEDONS IN NORTH CAROLINA,.GEORGIA,
AND SOVM CAROLINA.
A ADDITIONAL ALLOWABLE 1R11FIED ENTRIES ARE: LINE/1-CL-HL.SM,SC, LIRE/2-CL-HL,S14-SC.
3 RATINGS RASED ON ON, PART 603. 7-83.
C RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MALARIAL, 9/80.
0 WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMCRANDIRI-74, JAM 1972.
IF SITE INDEX 13 A SIRNART Of 5 OR MORE IEASIARQ"TS ON THIS SOIL.

Il I l 1 N 1 1: 11 1• H 1
I A I I U N :,
11 1 l l 4 11 U'.0A-'
CLf IL I.HAVELLV SANITY
1 LAM. 2 10 A
Nf NCCN 1, SLl PI S
'
111 Il :.L NI L:. CI.11' 1 •11 IN .1: L1. UIIA NI U NI Af/l Y LI V11 1I1
-IT
:II 111• :,IIIL� (11/
1.11I)MIINI UVI w./ll*.. IYI'l1.A11 - IIM •, IIAV1
1
f LGAM SLIT/ACC LATIN AIIIIUI 7 II.L11Lt, IIIICM- "t ..If11%O1L
:I ACC. IN! aUUS 1RAfUM
A
I% IILU f IIIM CLAY A111 C11 fXIINU'. IIIIIM AU IU FO IIN 11.', III.LU1
IS CUMNUNLY CLAY LOAM UN LUAM. TH!
!UIL OEVELUPLO IN RESIDUUM FIIGM CRYSTALINE RUCKS.
.
1--__-- --- ESilMwjfO
IDlPIHI
I(IN.11 USDA TExTURE I 1
IFI/AC7IPENCE1.1 Lf MATLHIAL LI.SS ILIUUIU IPLAS. I
UNIFIED I AASHTO I>J 1N I_Iretl�Y1•A�SING SIEVE 1fL- I LIMIT ITICITYI
1 0-7 IGR-SL I
IGw. GM -GC. SM. SM-SCIA-2. A-1
1[PCi)1
1
��-_yli 1 /� 12ao I _
0 I40-7t ]5-72
17-501C IIN• ML IA-7• A-5
25-60 1J-20 I <22 1Np-I
'
Ibo-75IWe I I
I I I I
I I 1 I
1
1
I
0 Ii7-100 92-100 72-99 55-YS I ♦1-60 9-37
I I
1 I I I
1 I I I
OLP YNICIwr IMO151 tj LKI PERMCA- I AVAILAULE I SOIL
IIIN.IIIPCT I DENSITY
I SALINITY I SHRINK- IERCSICNIWINO ICRGANICI CORROSIVITT I
1 tlIL17Y INATER CAPACtTYIREACT)CNIIMMHOS/CMII SWELL IU.02_RR2IEACU•IMAY TEA 1
01LjjILLMJL-1 fIN/MRl I [IN/j[(L--�_ IPHI
1 (POT
I
NT1661-S-1 T IGRCUPIjPCT1
15-201 1.0-1.5 I b.0-20 I. 0.07-0.09 14.5-6.0
I -
1 STEEL LLIgHeA I
1.]-l.S i 0.6•-2.0 i 0.1 ]-0. 13 10.5-5.5
I LOW 1.2.1 6 1. - I .7-2 IMOp AAI,F IMOOLpATEJ
1 - IWJOERATE
I50-73�•o-60i
I I I I I I
I I
1.2E
1
I I
I I i I I
I FLCOUIN.. 1_ HtGn rAIER TABLE
1
I 'YKNT n�PLLl-_HLDROC
ISINtjQENCE IHYGIPOTENT-LI
I DEPTH I KIND IMUNTnS IDEPT/1IHARONESSIDEPTH INARDMESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I I FREQUENCY UBA71ON IMONTHS 1 try) 11
I
I N[b�
1[1Nf I
I (IN 1 I 19IN1 IIIN) I I A TICK
SAnITAHY FACILITIEc
STRL�71Ch_MATFRI
I I MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY
II
I FAIR-LGW STREN4TH•SMRIMK-$YELL
AL'.
(SEPTIC 7AAK 1
11
�.
I ABSORPTION I
._. - .. .. -
I I ROADFILL
.. ... _.. ... .._. .... 1 __
FIELCS 1 ..
.. I
NOOEgATE-SEEPAGE•SLOPE
II
- 1
_
I SEWAGE L
I pCGp-EXCESS FlNE3 1
_
LAGOCN I
II SAND
I AREAS I
I I MODERATE -TOO CLAVEY.SLEPAGE
II
I PCGR-EXCESS FINes
I SANI TAI4V 1
I I
I LANDFILL I -
II GRAVEL
1
1
(TRENCH) j
II
\
SL (GMT
SANITARY i
II
II
_
1 POOR -THIN LAYER
( .AI40P LL 1
II TOPSOIL
I
I
I IAAEA{ 1
I
1 I FAIR -TUC CLAYEY
1 DAILY
COVER FCq I _.. _.. -.... _.__ __. .... _.
-i AIEBAHAGENENT _..
.
1 I __ _
LANDFILL
,.I I _.,
I MODERATE -SEEPAGE ....... ,.__.._.. .. ... .... .. .....
1-1—�--
II POND
1
- --- —
I I RESERVOIR
I
II AREA
I
_ �Il Ljjjtl�ll�QEYFLUPNEjyI_
11 1
I
I I MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY
II
-1
I MODERATE-HARO TO PACK
SNALLCr I
IIEMSANKMENTS
I
IEKCAVAT IONS I - - -.. _.__._ _... .._. _. __ _ ....
DINES AND
_. _ -... .. .. _.. .. 1
LEVEES.
I I MCDERATE-SHRINK-SWELL.L011 STRENGTH
II -
SEVER!-hC rATER
DWELLINGS
_I
EXCAVATED
1
- I ■ITHCUT 1
II PONDS
1 I
1 BASEMENTS 1
IIAOUIFER FED
I
MODERATE-SHRINK-SWELL.LO11 STRENGTH
II
I NOT NEEDED
I DWELLINGS I
II
I
_ DRAINAGE
It
I
BASEMENTS
_ .. ... _.
i
I I MODERATE-SLOPE.SHRINK-SWELL.LOW STRENGTH
II
1 SLOPE .$LGr INTAKE
SMALL 1 ... .._. _...._ ..
11
,. ... I ...
I COMMERCIAL 1
11 IRRIGATION
I 1
I UUILOIhGS I
II
I
I I
I 1 MODERATE-LUf STHCHI:Tit. SHRINK-SWEALL
II
I SLOPE_-- —
l
I LOCAL I
II TERRACES
I
1
1 ROADS AND 1
II AND
I
1
I STREETS I
II OIVERSTUNS
1 1
I LArhS. I
ILANOSCAPING 1
--
SLOPE
I I
1
AND GCLFI
II GRASSED
II WATERWAYSFAI
I
I I
1 WAYS 1
I I
—--..HEfillt!L IAiEPpHtj1lljQ�—�--
,
i i
1

L 1 I.L VNAVI LI.T ]AkL. LUAM• - 11. .1 111 RLI NI 1LLI6.1 1. Ui1.A -'./ •,
- - -- - ------------------------acLl1cn11unA1.-yLyuurnLnl------------------ -------- -' --
i I NUIIC/1A 1/-MALL :1 UNI.'. I I I 111•1111•AI/-31 III•( 1
I I II 1 I
1 Apt AS 1 I (PLA YI•R OUNuS I
I 1 SL[GMT II I SL IGI-T
I I II PAINS I I
I
l PICNIC ANEA3I II AND I I
I I II TRAILS I
_I
CAPde1Lj=T AND YIFLfJS PER ACNE LF [.POPS AND Pa5711RE 'HIGH LE Yf.L MANAGEMFNjJ _
I I CAPA- I CCRN I CCTTON I OATS I PEACNE3 I TOOACCO ILC'GUME NAV I PASTURE__ I
I BILITY I I LINT I I I I 1 I
I I I f1wil_—1 (SUI t _ foul _j e�e31 1 ern 31 1—LAUfU_ I
I— — INIRMIIRR-ItUSH-11RR• 1njBE IIA8,-12411414 IIRN, INLEH IIFH. WAR IlEa.JhJRA 11 ff.-1ajE1B--LjBBA-I
I 12E I I V5 I' 1750 1I 1 '40 I 1 500 1 12100 1 13.2 I 16.s I I
I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-
-
I 1 I 1 1 I l l I I I I I I 1 I I I
--J9C OLAN9-SS11IABILITY _
J 1 0RC I �lSN�GE!lEtII_P1t9HLL-ri_ I P9jENTIAt`PROoLC7IVI7Y I
I SYM I EROSIONI EQUIP. ISEEDLINGI rINOTM.I PLANT I COMMCh TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT - I
I— I 1 jtUARO I` LIMIT I MCAT-Y.I HAZARD I COMPET.I I IMOl[1 I
I 130 1 SLIGHT I SLIGHT I SLIGHT I `LIGHT I SLIGHT IEASTERh of -IT E Pt%E ISO JEA37EPN UNITE PINE I
I I I 1 I I I ILCBLCLLT PINE ISO •ILOBLCLLY PINE 1
I I I 1 1 1 1 ISHCATLEAF PIKE 169 AISLASH PINE I
1 I J I 1 1 i IVIRGINIA PINE 173 •IYELLOW-POPLAR
1 I I I _I 1 JELACK OAK
1
1 I I I 1 J J INGRTMER% FED OAK 102 •1 I
I I I I I I I IPOST OAK lea •I'
1 I I I I I I ISCARLET CAK ISO •1 1
I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I I 1
1
_ — lj1YGHBEAISS __
1 1 SPE"5 -1NT1 SPECIES INTI _--seL IESIMTI SPECIES —111jI
I Milk
-I I
---•- -- I '':' I I I I I' I � I 1
L
I I POTENTIAL FOR MARIJAT F1-EMENIS SAS-DAnj IAT LOAI_
1 ICRAIN GIGRASS LI WILD IHAROYO ICONIFERISHRU05;. IMETLAMOISNALLCrIOPEMLO INCOOLO I%ETL AND I RANGELOI,
1 j�EED ILEGUME I MEHB, 1 TRj:ES IPLANTS I IPLAw]S_IJATEG liILCLF IrILOLR IrItOLE-111"LE-1
1 I FAIR I GOLD I GOOD I GCCO I' GCOC I - IV. PCCAIV. PCCAI GC 1 0000 IV. POORI - 1
I �1_ I I I 1 1 1 ►__�— I 1 1 I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PL►ajsOMMLMITT [RANGELAND GR FCREST JjhDLu TCFY YEGETAT 0a
I PLANT I PEtlUNTAGE COMPOSITION IfIRY ■EIGHT)
.., COMrCN PLANT hAYE I_ SYMdQL 1 _ - - - I I _ •..
LcNLsPhi 1 1 I I
I I I I I I 1 I
i 1 1 I I I I I
I i I I I I 1 J
1 i I I I I I 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I 1 1
I POTENTIAL PROOIICTION 1LBS./AC. BUT WTI.
I FAI.ORABLE YC.ARS
1 NOFMAL YEARS I I 1 ( I 1
y11FAVORABLE YfAB ---Lam__-- I I 1 1 I
FCOTNOTES
1 •�63 EASEC ON SRrFC COMMITTEE 1V GUIDE. APRIL IV TO.
i 196EK IS A SUMMARY OF 5 OR NONE MEASUREMENTS ON THIS SUILA

Established Series
Rev. TRG:JCM
8/80
i
PACOLET SERIES
The Pacolet series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in material weathered
mostly from acid crystalline rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are 15 to 25 percent but range
from 2 to 40 percent.
Taxonomic Class: Clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Hapludults.
Typical Pedon: Pacolet sandy loam --forested.
(Colors are for moist soil.)
Al--0 to 3 inches; brown 17.1YR 1111 sandy loam; few fine distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/81 mottles;
moderate medium granular structure; friable; many fine and medium roots; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
(1 to 4 inches thick)
821t--3 to 23 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm, slightly
sticky; thin continuous faint clay films on faces of pods; commun fine and medium roots; common very fine
pores; medium acid; gradual wavy boundary.
B22t--23 to 29 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; common fine distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm, slightly stinky; thin continuous faint clay films on faces
of peds; common very fine pores; few fine flakes of mica; medium acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined
thickness of the B2t horizon is 12 to 29 inches)
B3--29 to 37 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam; many medium distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (0 to 15 inches thick)
C1--37 to 52 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 4/6) and reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) clay loam; massive; friable;
thin discontinuous distinct clay films in cracks; few fine flakes of mica; 75 percent soft saprolite that
crushes easily; strongly acid; gradual wavy Boundary. (10 to 20 inches thick)
C2--52 to 70 inches; light yellowish brown (IOYR 6/4) lbam; common medium distinct red (2.5YR 4/6) and
strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) mottles; massive; friable; 90 percent soft saprolite that crushes easily- strongly
acid.
T e Locatloonn: Chester County, South Carolina; 3.4 miles south of Chester in Chester County; 1.3 miles south
o unc of State Highways 16 and 350; 3700 feet northeast of junction of State Highways 16 and 171; 0.9
mile northeast of )unction of unpaved State Highway 394 and unmarked county road and unpaved private road
leading north; 35 feet northeast of' unpaved private road.
Ran a in Characteristics: Thickness of the clayey part of the Ot horizon is at least 12 inches thick but does
no exten to a depth of greater than 30 Inches. Depth to hard bedrock is more than 60 inches. The soil is
very strongly acid to slightly auid in the A horizon, and very :0.r•ongly acid to medium acid thruughout the
rest of the profile. Content of coarse fragments ranges to as much as [O percent by volume in the A horizon
and to as much as 15 percent by volume in the B horizon. Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica in one
(_. or more horizons.
The Al or Ap horizon of most pedons has hue of 5YR to 10YR. value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1 to 4. In eroded
pedons the chroma ranges to B. The A2 horizon, where present, has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and
chroma of 3 to 8. The A horizon commonly is sandy loam but ranges to loamy sand, fine sandy loam, loam, or
gravelly sandy loam. In eroded pedons the A horizon is clay loam or sandy clay loam.
The B1 horizon, where present, and the upper part of the B2t horizon in some pedons. has hue of 2.5YR to 10YR,
value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 3 to B. It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam. The B2t horizon of most
pedons has hue of lOH or 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5. and chroma of 6 or 8. Mottles in shades of yellow or brown
are in the upper part of the B2t horizon in some pedons and in the lower part of the B2t horizon is most
pedons.. The 02t horizon is clay, sandy clay, or clay loam. The B3 horizon, where present, has hue of IOH to
I 5Y1, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6 or 8 commonly with mottles in shades of yellow or brown. The B3 horizon
of some pedons is mottled in shades of red, yellow, or brown. It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, loam, or
sandy loam.
i- The C horizon is clay loam, sandy cloy loam, loam. fine sandy loam, or sanely loam with as much as 90 percent
saprolite. It commonly is mottled 1n shades Of red, yellow, brown, or white. The Cr horizon, where present,
is saprolite of weathered granite, gneiss, or schist that can be crushed to loamy textures. This material
commonly 13 mottled in shades of red, yellow, brown, or white.
�._ Competing Ser-ies: These are the Appling, Aragon, Cecil, Chestatee. Georgeville, Herndon, Hulett, Madison,
Mayodan, Henkfn, Spotsylvania, and Wedowee series in the same family and the Hayesville series in a similar
family. Appling, Aragon, Cecil. Georgeville, and Herndon soils have a clayey Bt horizon more than 24 inches
thick. Nankin soils commonly have a thicker Ot horizon and are formed in marine sediments. Chestatee soils
have more coarse fragments throughout the solum. Hulett and Madison soils have a high content of mica.
Mayodan and Wedowee soils have a St horizon with hue of 5YR or yellower. Spotsylvania soils have a lithologic
discontinuity. Hayesville soils are mesic.
Gee raphhic_Setting: Pacolet soils are on gently sloping to steep Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are 15 to
75 percent 55 range from 2 to 40 percent. The soils formed In material weathered mostly from acid
�L crystalline rocks. Near the type location, the mean annual temperature is 610 F.. the freeze -free season
:eographiHallly
verages 227 days, and the mean annual precipitation is 51 inches.
Associated_ Soils_: These are the competing Appling, Cecil. Madison, and Wedowee series, the
similar ayesvfM _jerfc9.•anJ the Cataula. Lockart, Louisburg, Rion, and WaLeree series. Cataula soils have
a layer in the B horizon that is dense and partially brittle. Lockhart soils have more than 35 percent coarse
1 fragments and have mixed mineralogy. Louisburg. Rion, and Wateree sails have less than 5 percent clay in the
.particle -size control section and have mixed mineralogy.
3
Drainage and Permeahility: Well drained; runoff is rapid; internal drainage is medium; permeability is
Use and Vegetation: Most areas are in forests of pine and mixed hardwoods. Cleared areas are used for small
Bra n�, i1ay, and pasture.
L

Pacolet Series 2
Distribution and Extent: The Piedmont of Alabama. Georgia. North Carolina. South Carolina. and Virginia. The
series is of large extent.
Series Established: Catawba County. North Carolina; 1969. _
Remarks: Pacolet soils were formerly mapped as a thin solum phase of the Cecil series. The linear
relationship between the thickness of the clayey St horizon and depth to the bottom of the clayey St horizon
is used as series criteria instead of solum thickness in separating this series from the Cecil series.
Additional Data: Particle size analysis is on file for this pedon.
National Cooperative Soil Survey —
U. S. A.

SCOO15 SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD
MLRA(S)t 136 PACOLET SERIES
REV. BNS, 6-47
TYPIC HA'LWULTS, CLAYEY, KAOLINITIC, THERNIC
THE PACOLET SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED, MODERATELY PERMEABLE, SOILS OF THE PIEDMONT UPLANDS. TYPICALLY THESE SOILS
HAVE 3 INCHES OF BROWN SANDY LOAN SURFACE LAYER, AND RED CLAYEY SUBSOILS TO 37 INCHES OVERLYING WEATHERED ROCK. THEY ARE
ON SHORT TO NEDILM LENGTH SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE BOTTHLANDS AND DRAIMAGEWAYS. THEY DEVELOPED IN RESIDUUM WEATi1FAED FROM
GRANITE, GNEISS AND SCHIST. SLOPES RANCE FROM 2 TO 80 PERCENT.
I IM WIL FRUFtX1jLb JAI I
I CTOUID iPD�I
t(IN.)I USDA TEXTURE ! UNIFIED I AASHTO 1 3 INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE N0. I LIMIT ITICITYI
1 I _ I I I(PCT11 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 IINDEX 1
rr, •r , r
I o-3 ICE. SCL
..w.,
ISM -SC, SC
IA-s. n-1-u, A-+
IA-h, A-6
1 Y-L
( 0-1
107-1w OV-INV •4-7Y 10-44 1
195-100 90-100 65-65 36-50 1
AO
20-440
NPr-/
( 4-17
1
(
1 0-3 ILS
ISM
IA-2
1 0-3
175-90 70-85 55-7S 15-30 1
30
IMP-3
1
l 3-2915C, CL, C
IML, MH
IA-6, A-7
1 0-1
180-100 80-100 60-95 51-7S 1
36-65
I11-30
(
129-521CL, SCL, SL
ICL, CL-ML, SN-SC. SCIA-2. A-6, A-6
1 0-2
160-100 70-100 60-60 30-60 1
20-35
1 5-15
1
52-7015L FSL L
BULKI
ISM SM-SC
yXj
IA-i A-2-\
1 0-2
180-100 70-100 60-60 30-50 (
28
INP-6
1
I(IM.)I(PCT)1 DENSITY 1
BIL(TY WWATER CAPACITY (REACTION I (MMHOS/CM) I SWELL [FACTORS IEROO. (MATTER I
1
1 I 1 (G/013) I
(lN/1sR) 1 (IN/IM1
1 (PH I
14.5�5
IPOTENTIALIrii-ICROIJPI
(PCT) 1
1
1 0=3—f a-lbiT�b=T310 11
. -
—
—3—i- —
1
1 0-3 120-3511.30-1.SO 1
0.6-2.0 1 0.10-0.14
14.5-6.5 1 -
I LOW
1.241 2 1 5 1 .5-1 1
1 0-3 1 S-1511.00-1.50 1
2.0-6.0 1 0.06-0.10
14.5-6.5 1 -
I LOW
1.151 3 1 3 1 .5-2 1'
l 3-29135-6511.30-1.50 1
0.6-2.0 1 0.12-0.15
14.5-6.0 1 -
I LOW
1.201
129-52115-3011.20-1.50 1
0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15
I\.S-6.0 I -
1 LOW
1.281
152-70110-2511.20-1.50 1
0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15
-- -
14.5-6.0 I
i LOW
1.281
1 1- LUUU I W.
HICR
WATER TAEU I CEFOM
PAN
I ULDRUCK IbUaSIDENCE
IHYDIPOIENI'LI
I _
I-FPTHi--nW
TRR7.IT0MICRPI
FROST
l
SANITARY FACILITIES (8)
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
I - 1 -
ISEPTIC TANK 18-15\: IRATE-PCRCS SLOWLT,SLOPE '
1-5 : —1
II 115-2-25\: FAIR -SLOPE I
I ABSORPTION 115+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 ROADF(LL 1 25+\: POOR -SLOPE I
l FIELDS I
II
t I
II I I
I HDDERATL-5ELPAGE,5LOPE
I SEWAGE 172;%, SEVERE -SLOPE
If 1 t
1 IACDON (
II SAND ( 1
I AREAS (
If
1
lI Z-U%:-
II I t
I
I SANITARY 1 8-15\: MODERATE -SLOPE
If I l
I LANDFILL 1_.154\: SEVERE -SLOPE
GRAVEL
1 (TRENCH)
, i _
11
l -
- : - 1
I SANITARY 18.15\: MODERATE -SLOPE
II I.15+\: POOR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE l
I LANDFILL 1 15+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
TOPSOIL
1 (AREA) I
It 1 1
1 I
I
II I l
1
-
( DAILY 'l 8-15%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY.SLOPE' "" " '
Il -WATER MANAGEMENT (8)
I COVER FOR ( 15+\: POOR -SLOPE
Il— T2-3%s MO0ERAM l
( LANDFILL 1
" , It POND 13-8\: MODERATE-SEEPACE.SLOPE l
1 I
It RESERVOIR 18F\: SEVERE -SLOPE
l! AREA 1 •; _..
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (8)
It I I
l : - CQY
-
1 SHALLOW 1.8-15\: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
IIEMBANKMENTS I .-
(EXCAVATIONS 1 15+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 DIKES AND "I
1
11 LEVEES l l
1 -
I DWELLINGS 18-15\: MODERATE -SLOPE -•
-
11 EXCAVATED I I
1 WITHOUT 115+tt SEVERE -SLOPE
It PONDS 1 l
l BASEMENTS I -
IIAOUIFER FED ( _... _ ... .... 1
-
11 I 1
1 DWELLINGS 18-1S\: MOOERATE-SLOPE
I" II
11 ( 1
I WITH l 15+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
It DRAINAGE l 1
I BASEMENTS 1
I 1
It I 1
II I I
I -
I SMALL 1 4-8\: MODERATE -SLOPE
- I
11 1 3+\ SL.FSL,CL,SCL,L: SLOPE 1
I COMMERCIAL 1 8+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
It IRRIGATION i 2-3\ LSt FAST INTAKE 1
I BUILDINGS 1
11 1 3+% LS: FAST (NTAKE.SLOPE ... I
1 I
II i
1
1 LOCAL 1 8-15\: MODERATE -LOW STRENGTH,SLOPE
FAVORABLE 1
11 TERRACES 1 8+\ CL.SCL:�SLOPE I
I ROADS AND 1 15+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 AND ( 2-8\ SL.LS,FSL.L: SOIL BLOWING 1
. ( STREETS 1
11 DIVERSIONS 1 8+\ SL.LS,FSL.L: SOIL BLOWIHG,SLOPE 1
( (
11 I l
1
(LANDSCAPING 18-15\: MOOERATE-SLOPE
- I
11 GRASSED 1 8+\: SLOPE
1 AND GOLF I IS+\: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 WATERWAYS I 1
I FAIRWAYS I
It
t I
1
• I I
i 1 l
1 I
11 ( 1
i
I
1
(
L.

PACOL£T SERIES
( I a-1St: NoOOIATE-SLOPE 11 1 2-6t SL.LS,FSL: MODERATE-SLOPE.SMALL STONES I
1 CAW AREAS 1 15+t: SEVERE -SLOPE IIPLAYCROU1DS 1 6+4: SEVERE -SLOPE I
1 I 11 ! 1
1 11 1 1
1 1
1 l 8-13t: MODERATE -SLOPE 11 PATHS 1 15-25t: MODERATE -SLOPE
IPICNIC AREAS[ 15+t: SEVERE -SLOPE 11 AND 1 25+t: SEVERE -SLOPE l
I 1 II TRAILS I I
I DETERMINING
I BILITY
I FESCUE
1 KIDAGRA53 I LINT
I
I 1
1
I PHASE
1
1
1 tAUI1)
( (LBS
t
BU
1 L551 1
I
1
1
KIK.
1-
12-6t CL.SCL.EROOED
t 3E I
1 9.0 1
-
1 6.0 1
1 500 1
1 75
1
119M 1 1
I I 1
16-10% "
t 3E 1
1 6.5 1
1 6.5 1
t 650 1
1 75
t
11800 1 1
1 I t
(6-lOt CL.SCL.8mm
I hE I
1 5.0 1
1 5.0 1
1- 1
1 50
1
11600 1. 1
1 F t
I10-15%
l ♦E l
1 5.5 1
1 6.0 1
1 550 1
1 65
1"`
I1400 1"
115-25%
l 6E I
I - [
1-
125+%
l 7E I
l- F
1-
(to -IS% CL,SCL,EROOCD
l 6E 1
1 4.5 1
1 5.5 l
1- 1
l-
115+% CL,SCL,ERODED
1 7E 1
I
1 1
1 1
•I !
1 I
1
1
t 1 I
I I 1
1 -
JORDI KNUUM4ERT PROBLEMS
1 PUILNT1AL YKUUUL11V11T
1 I
1 DETERMINING
ISYMI
I TREES TO PLAIT 1
I PHASE
I IMAZARDILIMIT INORT'YIHAZARDICONPETI
11MOXICLASI
I-
115+%
1 BRIMODER.INOOER.ISLICHT( 1
ISHORTLEAF PINE
170
1 a
ISHORTLEAF PINE 1
I
IYELLOW-POPLAR
190
1 6
IYELLOW-POPLAR - 1
(
1 l 1 1 I 1
[VIRGINIA PINE
l-
I-
[EASTERN WHITE PINE I
I
I ( 1 I l 1
(NORTHERN RED OAK
I-
l- `1
I
(
[ I l I 1 1
INICRORY
(
1 1 l I t 1
[WHITE OAK
12-15% CL.SCL.ERODED
1 6C(MODER.IMODER.IMODER.I I
ILOBLOLLY PINE
170
1 6
ILOBLOLLY PINE l
I15+% CL,SCL,EROOED
16C[SEVERE ISEVEP.EISEVERE I 1
ISHORTLEAF PINE
160
1 6
ISHORTLEAF PINE 1
(
l ( 1 I 1 1
IYELLON-POPLAR
LBO
1 5
IYELLOM-POPLAR 1
1
[EASTERN WHITE PINE 1
I DETERMINING
I PHASE
I M WILD IHAROWO ICONfrtKlsHKuw IVI:IIrKul.,MlLu■Ivrcnu, lwwv 1.��+....�..-...�.-..
I SEED IIFWME 1 HERB. 1 TREES IPLANTS I !PLANTS I WATER IWILOLF IWILDLF IWILDLFFIW
1-
12-10% CL,SCL,EROOED
...1 POOR 1 POOR I POOR
I. FAIR
1 FAIR I
-
IV. POORIV. POORI POOR 1 FAIR
-
IV. POORI 1
110-15%
1 POOR I'FAIR I POOR
1 FAIR
1 FAIR 1
-
IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR
IV. POOR[ - 1
I15+%
IV. POORI POOR I POOR
1 FAIR
(-FAIR t
-
IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR
IV. POORI - 1
110-15% CL,SCL,ERODED
IV. POORI POOR IV. POORI POOR
1 POOR I
-
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORI PODR'.IV.
POOkI _ I
115N CL SCL ERODED
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. PODRIV. POORI
-
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POOR) I
1
COMMON PUNT
NAME 1 (MLSPNI 1
-
'
t
l
I11-3
I 1
1 r
l
l
IPANICIl1
_... 1 PANIC I
0
1
(TALL OATCRASS
( ARELL 1
2
ISW17CHCANE
l ARTE4• 1
6
1 I
R10NEYSUCKLE
I IONIC 1
29
1
9
1 (
1
ICRAPE
I VITAS 1
4
1
-
1 l
[
---ITICKCLOVER
_ ... -1 DESMO I
..._.. 2
1
ILESPEDEZA
I LESPE 1
4
12
t l
IELLIOTT SLUESTEII
A AMEL l
-
1
12
l 1
(SPLITBEARD BLIIESTEM
1 ANTE2 1
-
1
12
lufau Ams
I mm I
a
1
31
1 t
1
..
•l (
1
1 l
1
1
t
YEARS
1
1
1
RS
2450
1
1650
1 1
I
UNFAVORABLE YEARS 1
1950
1-
1%50
I (
I [
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES USED ON TEST DATA OF 6 PEDOMS-
a RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART [I, SECTION 403.
C MATE PINE CAN BE CROWN AT HIWER ELEVATICNS.

SC0107 SOIL 1 NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD
1 V): 15- PACOLFT SERIES
RE. B-
REV. N5, 87 GRAVELLY
TYPIC HAPLUDULTS, CLAYEY, KAOLINITIC, THERMIC
THE PACOLET SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED. MOOERATELY PERMEABLE SOILS Of THE PIEDMONT UPLANDS. TYPICALLY THESE SOILS ,
HAVE 3 INCHES OF A CRAVELLY SANDY LOAN SURFACE LAYER AND RED CLAYEY SUBSOILS OVERLYING WEATHERED ROCK. THEY AM ON SHORT '
I TO MEDIUM LENGTH SLOPES ADJACENT TO BOTTONLANDS AND DRAINAGSWAYS, THEY DEVELOPED IN RESIDUUM WEATHERED FROM GRANITE,
GNEISS. AND SCHIST. SLOPES RANGE FROM 2 TO 45 PERCENT.
1UTIKAILB SOIL PROP
IDEPIH1 LTA(
[(IN.)[ USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED I AASHTO 1 3 INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE ND. I LIMIT ITICITYI
I_ I _ I I 1 PCT I 1 IINDEX 1
1 0-3 ICR-CL, CR-SCL ISM, SM-SC, SC IA-4, A-6 1 0-3 195-100 90-100 65-85 36-50 1 20-40 1 4-17 1
l 3-2915C, CL. C IML. MH IA-6, A-7 1.0-1 160-100 80-100 60-95 51-75 1 38-65 111-30 I
129-521CL,_SCL. SL ICL-ML. SM-SC. SC IA-2, A-41. A-6 ( 0-2 150-100 70-100 60-90 30-60 1 20-35 1 5-15 I
152-70ISL, FSL, L ISM, SM-SC IA-4, A-2-4 UO-2 180-100 70-100 60-60 30-50 1 28 INP-6 I
8
I(lN. 1 PCI)I DENSITY 1 BILITY (HATER CAPACITY IREACTION ((M!K)S/CM)( SWELL IFACTOR51fsR00-,.{MATT...-.-...ER ( (
1 1 I SC/CM3) I (IN/HR) I ((N/IN) 1 5�5 I IPOTENT(ALI- Low �TiIGROUPI •5 T) I l
{-yen a ainr.p..s-T551f T
1 0-3 127-3511.20-1.50 ( 0.6-2.0 1- 0.08-0.15 14.5-6.0 1 - l LOW 1.201 2 1 • 1 .5-2 1
13-29135-6511.30-1.50 ( 0.6-2.0 1 0.12-0.15 14.5-6.0 1 - I LOW 1.281 ( 1 l
129-52115-3011.20-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15 14.5-6.0 1 - ( LOW 1,201
152-70110-2511.20-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.08-0.15 114.5-6.0 1 - 1 law I_Ie:
SANITARY FACILITIES (0)
'LRCS
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (8)
1 - - SrOWLY
ISEP71C TANK 18-154: NOOERATE-PERCS SLOWLY.SLOPE
(( I I5-25ts FAIR -SLOPE
1
1 ADSORPTION 1 15at:•SEVERE-SLOPE
- It ROADFILL l 25at: POOR -SLOPE.
FIELDS I
I(
1
II 1
(
I I - MOOERATr_-5Eff%m.sm
SEWAGE 1 7rtsSEVERE-SLOPE
II
1 LAGOON 1
I AREAS (
11 SAND ;,:....
1 -
1 SANITARY (8-15% MODERATE -SLOPE
-
_• (( 1
1
1 LANSOFILA. 1 15*%: SEVERE -SLOPE
(( GRAVEL
I (TRENCH) 1
1
t - s SLIGHT
i SANITARY 'l' 8-15t: MODERATE -SLOPE. -" -
Z-15%: POOK-100 CLAYEYl
-.--_._I( ____.._.. (.15at: POOR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
I LANDFILL. 115ats SEVERE -SLOPE
ll TOPSOIL I
)
l (AREA) I
I I
—tl I
l
1 I Z-U%:-
1 DAILY 1 8-15t: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY.SLOPE
If WATER NANAGEi1ENT (0)
1 COVER FOR 1' IStts POOR -SLOPE -
- ItMODERATE
- s
l LANDFILL )_ -
ll POND 13-8ts MODERATE-SEEPACE SLOPE
1 ;
I (
It RESERVOIR I a+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 AREA 1
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT 8
l(
I - :
_
I SHALLOW ( 8-15%: MODERATE -TOO CLJAYEY,SLOPE
I(ENBAHKMENTS 1
I
(EXCAVATIONS 1 15ats SEVERE -SLOPE
I DIKES AND I
It LEVEES
11 t
I
I DWELLINGS 1 8-ISts MODERATE -SLOPE
11 EXCAVATED (
I WITHOUT 1 ISat: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 PONDS I
I BASEMENTS I
IIAWIFER FED I
11
I - :
(
1
I DWELLINGS 18-IS%: MODERATE -SLOPE
11 (
I
!
I WITH 1 15at: SEVERE -SLOPE
It DRAINAGE 1
1
I BASEMENTS I
II (
1
1 1
1 - :
1 SMALL 11-8t: MODERATE -SLOPE
- s
It 1 3at: SLOPE
1
I COMMERCIAL 1 8ats SEVERE -SLOPE
It IRRIGATION i
I BUILDINGS 1
it !
1 1
11 I
I
II Z-a%i
I LOCAL 18-15ts MODERATE -LOW STRENIGTM,SLOPE
s VAVUKAMEI
11 TERRACES 1 8at: SLOPE
)
1 ROADS AND I IStts SEVERE -SLOPE
11 AND I
1
I STREETS I
! I
11 DIVERSIONS i
(
l
ILA - :
CAPING
ILANOSI e-ISts MODERATE -SMALL STONES,SLOPE
- : FAVORABLE
I
It GRASSED I Bats SLOPE
1
t A10 GOLF 1 15N: SEVERE -SLOPE
11 WATERWAYS 1
1
I FAIRWAYS I
1 I
11 1
II I
I
REGIONAL NlLXPMtlAIlOFZ
I
l
1 1
I 1
(
1
I
•

PACOIET SERIES SCO107
GRAVELLY
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT B
1 - -SK02: 31%mmul il 1 76 5&VLJ(k-5MALL 51UI&5i
I 1 8-15\1 MODERATE -SHALL STONES.SLOPE 11 1 6N1 SEVERE-SLOP£,SMALL STONES 1
I CAW AREAS i IS+%% SEVERE -SLOPE IIPLAYGROUNDS I 1
I ( It 1 1
I 11 I 1 I
I - 1
1 1 8-15%1 MODERATE -SMALL STOIES,SLOPE 11 PATHS 1 15-25%t MOD ERA TE-SLOP£ 1
IPICHIC AREASI 154%1 SEVERE -SLOPE It AND 125+t1 SEVERE -SLOPE
I I It TRAILS 1 1
1 ( II 1 I
1 DETERMINING
( PHASE
1
1 BILITY
l
I
I (WAN
1 LINT
1 (1851
(
1 L851
l FESCUE
I (AUM1
1 MiDACRASS I i
I (AUMI 1 r
I
- 1
(-
16-10%
1 3E 1
1 75 1
1 650 1
11800 1
1 6.5 1
1 6.5 1 1 1 t
1
1 l
I10-15% -
1 4E 1
1 65 1
1 550 1
11400 1
1 S.5 1
1 6.0 1 --1
115-25%
1 6E 1
1- i
I- I
I- I
1 5.0 1
1 5.5 1 1 1 1
l l
125+1%
1 7E I
I - I
1- I
I- I
I- I
I- I I I 1
1 1
12-6% CR-SCL.GR-a
1 3E 1
1 70 l
I SOO 1
11900 1
1 6.0 1
1 6.0 1 1' l (
i
16-10% CR-SCL.GR-CL
t 4E I
1 SO 1
1- 1
11600 1
1 5.0 1
A 5.0 1 1 1 1
1
110-15% CR-SCL,CR-CL
( 6E i
I- I
1- 1
I- 1
1 4.5 1
1 4.5 1 1 1 I
1 l
115-25% GR-SCL.CR-CL
1 7E 1
I- t
1- i
1- 1
1- I
1 1 1 I l
l I
�VINL/YW JV 11l.VIL111 1L/
1
1 -
1 -DETERMINING
ISYMIilIM
f TREES TO PLANT
1
1 PHASE
1 IHAIARDILIHIT IMOkT'YIHAZARDICOFIPETI
IINIDXICLASI
1-
�Fj A�—t
115r4 `'
1"8RIMOOER.IMODER.ISLIGHTISLIGHTI
'ISHORTLEAF PINE
170
1'8
ISHORTLEAF PINE
I
I
IYELLOM-POPLAR
190
1 6
IYELLOW-POPLAR
I
I'
IVIRCINIA PINE
I-
1_
(EASTERN WHITE PINE
1/1
I
( l I l I I
[NORTHERN RED OAK
1
I 1 I ( 1 I
INICKORY
1
I ! 1 1 l F
IHHITE OAK :•
I-
I
1
1
12-15% CR-SCL,CR-CL
16CIMOOER.IHODER.(MOOER.1 1
IL08LOLLY PINE
170
1 6
ILOBLOLLY PINE
1
115*% CR-SCL,CR-CL
1 6CISEVEREISEVEREISEVEREI 1
ISHORTLEAF PINE
!60
1 6
ISHORTLEAF PINE
1
(
I I l f I l
!YELLOW -POPLAR
(80
1 5
IYELLOM-POPLAR
1
(
( ( 1 (
IVIRCINIA PINE
_1-
l-...IEASTERN
WHITE PINE
1/1
h __.I
I 1
[NORTHERN RED OAK
I-
I
1
(
I I 1 I 1 I
(HICKORY
1
I i 1 I 1 I
[WHITE OAK
r
1 I I I I I
' I
�t 1 �•rt.
I CLASS-
1
YVMr111 lAL rVK rWWI lAl tLtntnl.3
1 "IQ.. I— — —.mil.... .--.
I
I [DETERMINING
l PHASE
1
I SEED ILECUME I HERB. 1 TREES (PLANTS I
-
IPLANTS 1 WATER IWILDLF IWILOLF IWILDLF IWIILDLF 1
PtXJRI tAIR I G000 IV. I
(- - _.
110-15%
1 tAIR I tAlK
1 POOR 1 FAIR
I kAIK 1 0000 1 GOOD I
I POOR I FAIR I FAIR I -
IV. FOORIV.
IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR IV. POORI - I
115+%
IV. POORI POOR
1 POOR I FAIR I FAIR I -
IV. POORIV. POORI POOR I FAIR IV. POORI - 1
12-10% CR-SCL,GR-CL
I POOR I POOR
I POOR I FAIR I FAIR I -
IV. POORIV. POOR[ POOR 1 FAIR IV. POORI - 1
110-15-4 GR-SCL,CA-CL
IV. POORI POOR
I POOR I POOR 1 POOR I -
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POOR( POOR IV. POORI - 1
115+% CR-SCL.GR-CL
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORIV. POORI -
IV. POORIV. POORIV. POOR(V. POORIV. POORI - I
t COMMON PLANT MAKE 1 SYMBOL
IPANICUII
1 PANIC I
8 I I
I
1 t
1
(TALL OATCRASS
I AREL3 1
2 ( l
I
I
ISWITCHCAME
1 ARTE4' I.
6 ( I
l
1
1
IHOMEYSUCKLE
1 LOW 1
29 ( (
I
I
IGtAPE
.1 VITIS I
- 4
ITICKCLOVER
1 OESHO 1
2 1 I
I
1 I
(LESPEDEIA
1 LESPE l
4 1 1
I
1 1
IUNKNKIWMS
I' uUUI 1
e 1 I
1
I
t I
1 t
1
l 1
1 (
1
( 1
I I
I
1 1
t
1
I
FAVORABLE YEARS 12950
1t
(
NORMAL YEARS 1
2450 I I
1
1 1
I
UNFAVORABLE YEARS 1
1950
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 6 PEDONS.
8 RATINGS BASED ON MSH 7/83.
C WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON HFM. 9/80.
D EASTERN 'WHITE PINE CAN BE GROWN IN THE COOLEST PARTS OF THIS SOIL'S RANCE.

' :ritial,Review Draft Tentative Series
WEW: RAG.
7/83
GASTON SERIES
The Gaston series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils on
ridges and side slopes of the Piedmont uplands. They. formed in residuum
weathered from mixed acid and basic crystalling rock such as granite, gneiss,
quartz diorite, gabbro, and tonalite. Slopes range from 0 to 25 percent..
Taxonomic Class: .-Clayey, mixed, thermic Humic.Hapludults.
ITypical Pedon: Gaston sandy clay loam -- cultivated. (Colors are for moist
soil unless otherwise stated.). Ap--O to 5 inches; dark reddish brown (.5YR 3/4).;,yellowish red (5YR 5/4)
dry; sandy clay loam, weak medium granular structure;. friable ;..many fine roots;.
slightly acid; clear smooth boundary. (3 to 10 inches thick.)
Btl--5 to 14 inches; dark red (2.5YR 3/6) clay; moderate,medium subangular
blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic;. common fine and few medium roots; common
distinct clay films on face of peds.; few. black streaks;. moderately acid; gradual ,^
wavy boundary. ;(5 to 30 inches thick.) _.
..Bt2--14 to 47 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; few medium distinct reddish
yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm;
sticky, plastic; common fine roots; common distinct clay films on faces of peds;
few fine flakes of mica; few black streaks; moderately acid; clear wavy
boundary. (10 to 45 inches thick.)
BC--47 to 57 inches;, red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam; common medium distinct
reddish yellow (.7.5YR 6/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common fine flakes of mica; few
pockets of weathered black minerals; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary.
(0 to 24 inches thick)
C--57 to 72 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6), yellowish red (5YR 5/6),'and yellowish
brown (10YR 5/4) saprolite that crushes easily to .loam; rock controlled

Gaston Series 7/83
Page 2 t -
structure; common black specks and streaks; common fine flakes of mica; moderately
acid.
Type Location: Gaston County, North Carolina; 5 miles south of Belmont on
NC Highway 273; 0.9 mile south on State Road 2525; 500 feet south on field road;
250 feet west of road. - -
Range of Characteristics: Thickness of the clayey Bt horizon ranges from 24 to
48 inches, and it extends to a'depth of 34 to 58 inches below the surface. Depth
to bedrock is greater than 6 feet. The soil ranges from strongly acid to slightly _
acid unless limed.- Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica i.n the B
horizon and'few to -many flakes of mica in the BC and C horizons.
The A or AD horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 7.5YR, value of 3, and chroma of 3
to 6. It is loam,.'fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, or clay loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1OR or 2.5YR, value of 3 or 4, and chroma of 4 to
8. = Value of 3 is restricted to -the. upper part of the .Bt horizon. High chroma —
mottles and dark streaks or stains occur in most pedons. 'It is clay or clay loam.' -
The BC horizon, if present, 'has -hue of 2.5YR to 5YR, value 4 to 6, and-chroma
of 4 to 8. High chroma mottles and dark streaks or stains occur i"n most pedons.
It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The C horizon is commonly multicolored in shades of'red, yellow, and brown.
It is saproiite weathered from mixed acid and basic.crystalline rock that easily
crushes to loamy textures.
Competing Series: 'The Farragut series is the only other known series in the same
family. Farragut soils contain more silt and are formed from a thin layer of
colluvium over shale residuum. Series in closely related families are the Cecil,
Clifton, Coronaca, Cullen, Davidson, Georgeville, Gwinnett, Hanceville. Hiwassee,
Madison, Mecklenburg, Pacolet, Stoneville, and Tatum soils. Cecil, Coronaca,
Davidson, Georgeville, Gwinnett, Hiwassee, Madison, and Pacolet soils are kaolinitic.
In addition, Cecil, Georgeville, Madison, and Pacolet soils do not have horizons

Gaston Series 7/83
' Page 3
with moist value less than 4. Madison soils have -a high content of mica flakes,
Pacolet soils have thinner clayey horizons, and Coronaca soils are less acid.
Also, Coronaca, Davidson, Gwinnett, and Hiwassee soils have rhodic colors throughout
or in the upper meter of the argillic horizon. Cullen soils do not have A horizons
thicker than 5.9 inches that have moist value less than 3.5. Hanceville and
Stoneville soils have rhodic colors throughout the argillic horizon and have
Iformed in residuum weathered from sedimentary rock. Clifton, Mecklenburg, and
Tatum soils do not have A horizons thicker than 6 inches that have moist value less
than 4. Also, Clifton soils are mesic, Mecklenburg soils are less acid and have
slow permeability, and Tatum soils have formed in sericite schist or phyllite.
Geographic Setting: Gaston soils are on gently sloping to moderately steep
uplands of the Piedmont Plateau. Slope gradients are dominantly 2 to 15 percent,
but range from 0 to 25 percent.' These soils formed in -residuum weathered from
�._ mixed basic and acidic crystalline rocks such 'as quartz diorite, granite, gabbro,
hornblende gneiss, mafic gneiss, and tonalite. Near the type -location, Overage
annual precipitation is about 48 inches.. Mean annual temperature is about 590F.
Geographically Associated Soils: In additon to the competing Cecil, Cullen,
Davidson, Gwinnett, Hiwassee, Madison, and Pacolet series, -these are the Enon, Helena,
L _
Sedgefield, and Worsham series. Enon, Helena and Sedgefield soils have yellower
hue and low chroma mottles in the B horizon. Worsham soils .have dominant chroma
of 2 or less. Enon, Helena, and Sedgefield soils are on top slopes and smoother
parts of ridges. Worsham soils are in depressions and along intermittent drains.
Pacolet soils are on side slopes. The other soils occur in the same landscape
L—
positions as Gaston soils.
Drainage and Permeability: Well drained; medium to rapid runoff; medium internal
drainage; moderate permeability.
Use and Vegetation: More than half of the acreage is in cultivation or pasture
with the remainder in forest. Crops include small grains, corn, soybeans, hay and

Gaston Series ./83
Page 4 -
pasture plants. In forested areas, shortleaf pine, loblolly pine, Virginia pine,
hickory, northern red oak, red maple, Mack oak, eastern white pine, yellow -
poplar, white oak, and sweetgum are common trees. The understory includes
flowering dogwood, grape, sourwood, common trumpetcreeper, witchhazel, common
persimmon, winged elm, eastern redbud, eastern red cedar, sassafras, eastern -
hophornbeam, and American holly.
Distribution and Extent: Piedmont areas of North Carolina, and possibly Virginia,
South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. The series is of large extent. _.
Series Proposed: Gaston County, North Carolina; 1983.
Remarks: This series was formerly included with Cullen series and originally
fitted in the concept of the Lloyd series in North Carolina.. The large acreage
(25,000 acres in Gaston and Lincoln.Cos.,.NC) of soil similar to Cullen -but having
dark surface,layers with moist value. -less than 3..5 and dry value less than 6 i,n the -
Ap horizon supports proposal, of -this series...
Additional Data: -(NC State University)
Apparent CEC B.S.
Pedon .Horizon Depth (in.) -Me/100g clay (�
1 Bt2 .8-23 53.5
BC 53-60 6.2
2_ Btl 10-24 51.8 -
C 55-60 3.9
3 Bt 8-24 50
BC 55-60 2.7
4 Btl 7-28 23.7
5 Btl 12-24 34.8 -
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A..

MM170 501 L 1 NTERPRETAT (OHS RECORD
MLRA(S)1 136 GASTON SERIES
REV, WEW,RAC, 1-67
N UMIC HAPLU LILTS, CLAYEY, MIXED, THEMIC
THE GASTON SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED NEARLY LEVEL TO MODERATELY STEEP SOILS ON PIEDMONT UPLANDS- THEY FOAM IN
MATERIAL WEATHERED FROM MIXED ACID AND 81LSIC CRYSTALLINE ROGJC. TYPICALLY THE SURFACE LAYER IS DARK REDDISH BROWN SANDY
CLAY LOAM, 5 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL 15 52 INCITES THICK. IT IS DARK RID CLAY IN THE UPPER PART, RED CLAY IN THE MIDDLE
PART, AND RED CLAY LOAM IN THE LOWER PART. THE UlMDULYING MATERIAL TO A DEPTH OF 72 INCHES IS RED, YELLOWISH( NO, AND
YELLOWISH BROWN SAPPOL1TE THAT HAS A LOAN TEXTURE. SLOPES RANCE FROM 0 TO 25 PERCENT.
LIMIT IT(CITYI
l 0-6 ICL, SCL
ICL: SC, CL-44L, SM-SCIA-4, A-6
1 0-5 190-100 84-100.75-95
36-75 1 25-40 1 5-20 1
1 6-471C, CL
ICL, CH, ML, MH IA-7
1 O-S 195-100 90-100 80-"
65-90 1 W73 112-37 1
t47-571CL, SCL, L
ICL, SC IA-4, A-6, A-7
1 O-5 190-100 04-100 75-95
36-75 1 25-50 1 7-23 1
157-721VAR
I 1
I I
I 1 t
I I
I 1
1 1
I I 1
1
—
(
l(IM.)I(PCT)1 DENSITY
1 BILITY IWAYER CAPACITYIREACT ION(("§ S/Qi)I SMELL IFACTOIRS1EROP.IIATTER 1 1
I 1 1 (C/043)
_INN/HR) I ( WIN) f (PH) 1
(POTENTIALIr(i1GROlP1 (PCT) 1STEEL IMMIM
117-[/11.LV-I.�V 1 L.V-®.Y 1 V.,--V. �- - , - - - - - -
t 0-6 120-�011.30-1.G0 1 O.i-2.0 1 0.11-G.lf (5.1-6.0 1 — 1 LOW 1.281 4 l-] 1
1 6-47135-700.30-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 t 0.12-0.16 I5.1-6.5 1 — (MODERATE 1.241 1 1 1
147-57(20-40(.1.30-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.10-0.15 I5.1-6.5 I - I LOW 1.281
157-721 1 1 1 1 I I I I
SANITARY FACILITIES A
. CONSTRUCTIINR MATERIAL A
(
I PE i —RZEM I L-FERCS$LAQIt
I POUR—LOWt
(SEPTIC TANK
1 8-15%: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY,SLOPE
If
1 1
I ABSORPTION
115N1 SEVERE -SLOPE
11
ROADF(LL
1
t FIELDS
1
if
l
1
1
11
1 1
1
—
1 SEWAGE
1 MI.. MODERATE—SEEPACE,SLOPE
it
1 - 1
I LAGOON
1 7+N1 SEVERE —SLOPE ^
(I
SAND
I
I AREAS
1
11
1 l
I
I
it
I i
1
I U-15%:-
! SANITARY
1 15+%I SEVERE—SLOPEJOO CLAYEY
it
1 1
! LANDFILL
1
(l
GRAVEL
1
t (TRENCH)
1 .... .._
It
—
h .. t
t
-it
0-15%:—
I SA1ITARY
1 8-15E: MODERATE —SLOPE
it
1 15+%: POOR —TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE t
I LANDFILL
1 154%: SEVERE -SLOPE
(I
TOPSOIL
t 1
I (AREA)
f
If
1
1
I
It
I 1
DAILY
115+®1 POOR -TOO CLAYEY,NARD TO PACK,SLOPE
It
--WATER MAIIAGI]iENT (A)
1 COVER FOR
!
it
- 1 ESE f
( LANDFILL
I
If
POND
1 3-8t: MODERATE—SEEPACE,SLOPE 1
I
1 —
II.
RESERVOIR
1 8+11 SEVERE —SLOPE — l
11
AREA ...I
!
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (A)
If t- :
1 EZOit(:OCP
i3 1
.1 SHALLOW 1 8-150: HOOERATE-TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
IIEHBANKMEHTS l 1
IEXIAVAT(DNS 1 15N1 SEVERE —SLOPE
it DIKES AND I I
— 1 1 .. ._
t 1 LEVEES 1. t
t
11 1 1
1 HOUERAIL—SHRINK-5Wtii.—
f
f DWELLINGS 1 8-15E: MODERATE—SLOPE,SHRINK-SWELL
14 EXCAVATED P_ f
WITHOUT 1 15+%1 SEVERE -SLOPE
I PONDS 1
1 BASEMENTS l
IIACUIFER FED 1 1
I 1
'It 1 1
t
t DWELLINGS 1 8-15%: MOOERATE—SLOPE,SMIW-SWELL
11 l 1
I WITH 1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
It DRAINAGE I 1
1 BASEMENTS 1
if 1 1
I 1
II 1 1
1 i U-74%:— -
- (
1 SMALL 1 4-n: HOOERATE-SHRINK-SWELL,SLOPE
It f 3+%I SLOPE I
1 COIMERCIAL 1 5+%s SEVERE -SLOPE
It IRRICATIOII 1
1 BUILDINGS 1
It 1 I 1
I I
it I ;
1
1 LOCAL 1.15+61 SEVERE -LOW STRENCTH,SLOPE
11 TERRACES 1 8+%1 SLOPE I
R ROADS AND 1
11 AND I t
t STREETS 1 - --
It DIVERSIONS 1 1
1 1
11 1 I
1 LAWNS, 1 0-6%:-
l
ILANDSCAPING 1 8-15E1 NOOERATE-SLOPE
It GRASSED I B+®R SLOPE I
I AND GOLF 1 15+®: SEVERE -SLOPE
!1 WATERWAYS 1 I
I FAIRWAYS 1
It 1

—ON+Ow
Aii
•
ui(•� f�A•f
tor.
-n
PA� �N
8per m��
�8
�88�8
H 11 N
HIM!
g gg
a88a8
88888
««< K
1 1 1 1 1 1 0
—uQww—_w
U 1
w_I
G11i'
•
PP
u
OP
Ar
r�
Pin
__ _
_ _
tAl��
f
- -- ---
---
__--f---------
-�
NNNMw14
-.--_N--O--
o�Yr�ooO
O Q1040 �Y
----------—IT-1 L---
IA
q
I

IEPORT NUMBER
R2 52-004
A 81 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road . Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
SEND
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP
P O BOX 845
CLEMMONS NC 27012
ATE OF REPORT 09/ 08188 PAGE1
GROWER: JOHN P BEAM FARM
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
ACCT . 45129
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DI
ORGANIC i"
: `. PHOSPHORUS .
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
PH
HYDRO,
Cation
PERCENT
LAB
MATTER
.: ? . • ., T
•.
GEN
r
Exchange
n�
Capacity
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
1 ;
IWuk
Pp .,
s::;. K
;.
Mg
CA
NA ' '
SOIL
BUFFER
SAMPLE.:
NUMBER
% ' ; ' . ^ .;a •
4 :. ;
BnYI
i'':.::.
NeHco3 P ..
; •
.., ......
..
Ott
...
H
C.E.C.
%
%
%
%
X
NUMBER
.ENR'-
!CRATE', Rbj
pparpRATE '
.:. •..:
om•p RATE
ID m•K RATE''
ppA Mp RATE
ppmCa RATE
ppm•Na RATE
pH
pR"
meq/100p
m�q/100p
K
M,
G
H
NA
1
03693
2.6 9.3M
113 V 1A
134 V11
124 V
A 97 Vf
350 L
5.2
6.8
1.5
4.4
7.2
18.4
39.9
34.5
2
03694
3.1 113H
121 Vf
135 V11
127 V4
68 M
280 L
5.0
6.3
1.6
3.9
8.4
14.6
36.0
41.0
3
0369
2.2 85H
162 V
180 V11
113 VH
93 H
290 L
4.8
6.7
2.2
4.8
6.3
16.3
30.4
47.0
4
0369.
2.7 80M
93 V
109 V
1 490 Vi
269 V
490 L
5.7
6.8
1.6
7.5
16.7
29.3
32.5
21.0
5
03697
2.8 97M
83 V1
104 Vi
298 Vi
216 Vf
480 L
5.7
6.8
1.3
6.3
12.2
28.0
38.2
21.0
(SEE: EXPLANAT IUN UN UACK)
=
-; • � ,�
MANGA.�
•� :i ;>
•• �.
� `�l
• '•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB-:
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS '
SAMPLE
NITgATE °'
. SULFUR
ti ZINC.,; g
NESE
IRON'a '
COPPER
'BORON
EXCESS
SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
NUMBER
Noy
: r$
=' •Zn.�
Mn.
I. p•
Cu
B<
RATE
'`;
CI
Mo
r
%
�r
SOIL
wo-N83 N RATE
ppae�E RATE :
:� pp Zn RATE' +
ppm-Ma RATE
"pOo-Fe RATE'
ppiwCu RATE
pm•11 RATE
:' nlmhaslum RATE
ppnrCI RATE
ppm-Ma RATE[SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE
This report applies only to lne sampla(sl te,leo. Sample, au rtt.•nea
a maximum of Ifhlny days alter testing.
A & L EAS ERN G ICULTURAL LA O ATORIES. INC.
'
(� GrLI(Yl ClM
ORMAN JON"
BY

IEPORT NUMBER
R2 52-004
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road . Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
car,
SAMPLES A C C T 4 45120
SEND SUBMITTED
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP GROWER: JOHN P BEAM FARM BY. ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DI!
P O SOX 845
CLEMMONS NC 27012
ATE OF REPORT G9/0Bj88 PAGE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
:ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
PH `'
HYORO•
Cation
. • PERCENT
LAB
.i MATTER . : '
'. °+•
GEN
Exchange
BASE SATURATION )COMPUTED)
.. P1 :.
Py
K
M Y
Ca
Ni
SOIL
BUFFER
SAMPLE:'
NUMBER
% :. ; :, - h ENR
W
1. ukaBuY)
N,Mco3•P
.{...
:` ...
...
?, ...
H
Cat(ucity
C.E.C.
%
%
%
%
'�
NUMBER
RATE ' Ibp./A-
..:.
pp- p RATE
..:.
p m-I RATE
: ppm•K RATE
ppm ME RATE
ppm•Ca RATE
jpm•Na RATE
PH
p8 .
maq/100p
moq/100p
K
CA
N
No
6
113698
2.5 91M
70 VH
79 VH
143 V1
120 0
370 L
5.5
6.d
1.1
4.3
8.4
23.0
42.6
26.0
7
03699
3.7 115H
120 VH
134 V11
74 M
145 V
480 M
6.3
6.9
0.4
4.2
4.5
23.5
56.6
10.5
a
0370C
2.3 97M
68 VH
76 V11
58 M
72 0,
790 M
6.1
.5.9
0.4
2.6
5.8
23.5
56.7
14.0
9
03701
3.3 '10711,
40 Vh
58 H
133 Vi
175 VP
580 M
6.6
7.0
0.3
5.L1
6.8
2.9.2
58.0
6.0
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MANGA•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB•
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC "%
NESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
' SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
NUMBER
Ho,
S
Zn ' • :
Mn
_ F•
Cu
B
LIME'
RATE
CI
Mo
%
%y,
SOIL
pM•NOE•NRATE
pja3RATE'
ppals RATE
ppwMARATE
ppm-Fe RATE
ppmCuRATE
pprwgRATE
IamhodtmRATE
ppm-CI RATE
ppm-MoRATE
SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE
ThII rapoel applies only to in* fampia(s) tasieo. Sample ata i.ts-ad
a ntaximum of thlrty oays alto, lasting.
A 6 L EASTERN AGRICULTU LABORATORIES. INC.
nY C. NORMAN 6 NES

i
ORT NUMBER
?52-004
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road a Richmond Virginia 23237 • (8041743-9401
SEND
TOENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP.
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
GROWER: JOHN P BEAM FARM BY.
E 9/8/88 PAGE 1 SOIL FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS (Ibs./A)
Youp
AMPLE
:;::
i�1 �). • :.n:':f t�i+r i;if:i:��;; Ti.' 7j 7'
•J
•Jf• T ••�
!
C�QR ' 5�.,''r F:r'f �;r•
�.
YIELD `.' �'
p .i
y > i .AMENDMENT$
�Y'.:� r
N
PfO
q
-S
t,
Kin
Mg
S
Zn
Mn
MANGA•
Fe
Cu
B
MO
FI r r P 111
'li l�l�ht
nr.uc
,'? LIME••.
LIME
GYPSUM
•ELEMENTAL
UMBEF�i
�+(I ry�q���7y
) +.
1.11111A OfC�CO� 'TGNS%A
TOy>3/A
L�BAfI
NGEN
lPHA
POTASH
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IRON
COPFIR
BORON
OLONUM
%Nei,.•'
) 1',f1'wyqaa.I�
, AJ R� S F fall •r�'. yi"✓
;;'1
i
;
NESUM
1.5
i
2.0
2.5
1.5
1.5
ARKS
A 3 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. INC.
recommendations are based on research data and experience, but NO GUARANTEE or WARRANTY expressed or implied, concerning crop BY
rmance is made. C . NORMAN JON
n,...nnnr,c a 1 te.nerc are Inr the ercluave and cnnLrinnrial ,ce nl nw clients and may not he renrnducrd in whole or in nart. nor rnav anv reference be made to the work_ the rest is

)RT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
152-004 7621 Whitepine Road II► Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
lRl
SAMPLES Y
SEND SUBMITTED
TO ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DISP GROWER: JOHN P BEAM FARM BY:
is 9/8/88 PAGE 2 SOIL FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS (Ibs./A)
POUR
4MPLE
g`f;. •S� ��: C4•ti'ryz, .I• aa, .k:
:?, , COp; t 1: �,.
" `�.•`"�:"^' 3;,
YIELD
r: ri
'AMEND ENTS. `' `
'!. M L.;
;';ri r......
N
1' -
'.NITRO-
P O
Z 5.
"'•i 1=
K O .
Z
Mg
S
Zn
Mn
MAHOA•
Fe
Cu
B
MO
aU[p l0
rcnur,ti
„mr.41ui.
' IIIAE
'LIME
OYPBUM
ELEMENTAL
JMBER
1a r•..,';' yy� !i.'x+?xti:':"`'�?'''
.i .r.
L¢Mp
TON$/A
TONS/A
'i 6ULFUR ,
PF�OI=-•
POTASH
MAO•
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IpON
COPPER
BORON
MOLYB•
DENUM
cnr&Ac.-
%�S
n,
L@61A
GEN
PHATE�
NESIUM
2.0
0.5
0.5
0
kRKS
A 6 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
recommendations are based on research data and experience, but NO GUARANTEE or WARRANTY expressed or implied, concerning crop BY ��
mance is made.
C. NORMAN J ES

0
City of Chenyville
116 South Mountain Street
`�. NORTH CAROLINA 28021
Q�Y��r_ECI V D
n" of Et'"ONMENTIIL N1AgUFAI
MAY May 30, 1989
A""SVILLF
i,.' �EGIOIYAI
Rex Gleason
N. C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
Post Office Box 905
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
. Please find enclosed the last two quarterly analysis reports of the
under drain system on our Slude Storage Lagoon, performed in Jan. 1989
and April 1989 by E. M. S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions,.please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:ba
a

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CORRESPOND TO ----------------------------------------------------- SAMPLE
EMS Laboratories, Inc
N.C.
Waste Lab Cert. No.
98 EMS SAMPLE
: B13293
4132 Pompano Street
N.C.
Water Lab Cert. No.
37727 REPORT DATE
: 01/27/89
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
S.C.
Lab Cert. No. 99011
DATE RECEIVED
: 01/19/89
[phone]
U:S.
EPA id 00118
DATE COMPLETE
: 01/26/89
REPORT TO --------------------------------------- BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP 116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST. CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
------------------------------ DESCRIPTION ------------------------------
SLUDGE LAGOON DATE : 1/17/89
GRAB SAMPLE TIME : 8:00 AM
P.O. NUMBER : VERBAL
TEST DESCRIPTION
METHOD
DATE
ANALYST
ANALYTE
RESULT
DET. LIMIT
UNITS
------------------------------
-- —
— ----------------------
CHLORIDE ......................
�........... .4
...,.. :�.. .SM
407A
01/20/89
LW
CHLORIDE
:.. `• 222 t.
,,
5
MG/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DR AT.180-C
.:`::'.:.:..`.:EPA
160.1
01/23/89
LW
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ............
894
10
MG/L
CADMIUM, TOTAL ........................
....EPA
213.1
01/25/89
LBS
CADMIUM, TOTAL ...............
.�BDL
0.01
MG/L
INSTRUMENT ...................
. PE 3030
-
IRON, TOTAL ..... .............................EPA 236.1
01/26/89
LBS
IRON, TOTAL ..................
. 8.23
0.05
MG/L
INSTRUMENT ...................
. PE 3030
LEAD, TOTAL �
..................... ....EPA 239.1
01/24/89
LBS
LEAD, TOTAL ..................
.BDL
0.1
MG/L
INSTRUMENT ...................
. PE 3030
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP
....................EPA 200.0
01/20/89
MR
METALS, DIGEST ...............
: COMPLETE
NA
NA
INITIAL WT OR VOL ............
: 50
FINAL WT OR VOL ..............
. 50
'ND - Not Detected
NA - Not Applicable
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Sample was accompanied by chain of custody papers
Approved by : 0j,2"Al (YDIP) k Page 1 of 1

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CORRESPOND TO
SAMPLE
EMS Laboratories, Inc
N.C.
Waste Lab Cert. No.
98 EMS SAMPLE
i B14779
4132 Pompano Street
N.C.
Water Lab Cert. No.
37727 REPORT DATE
: 05/08/89
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
S.C.
Lab Cert. No. 99011
DATE RECEIVED
: 04/19/89
[phone]
U:S.
EPA id 00118
DATE COMPLETE
: 05/05/89.
REPORT TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
DESCRIPTION
SLUDGE LAGOON UNDERDRAIN
GRAB SAMPLE
P.O. NUMBER : VERBAL
BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
TEST DESCRIPTION METHOD
ANALYTE RESULT
------------------------------------------------- ---------- CHLORIDE .................... . .SM 407A
CHLORIDE..........F;" ..... �81
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT.180 C ..EPA 160.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ............ 9I0
CADMIUM, TOTAL .. ....... .............. ....EPA 213.1
CADMIUM, TOTAL ............... .BDL
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
IRON, TOTAL .. .... ......EPA 236.1
IRON, TOTAL .................. .1.03
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
LEAD, TOTAL .. ..................... ....EPA 239.1
LEAD, TOTAL .................. .�BDL
INSTRUMENT ................... . PE 3030
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP ....................EPA 200.0
METALS, DIGEST ............... COMPLETE
INITIAL WT OR VOL ..........:. 50
FINAL WT OR VOL .............. 50
ND - Not Detected
NA - Not Applicable
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Sample was accompanied by chain of custody papers
28021
DATE : 04/18/89
TIME : 08:00:00
DATE ANALYST
DET. LIMIT UNITS
05/05/89 SRG
1.0 MG/L
04/27/89 MSD
10 MG/L
04/27/89 MK
0.01 MG/L
04/27/89 MK
0.05 MG/L
04/23/89 MK
0.1 . MG/L
04/20/89 BW
NA NA
Approved by Page 1 of 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Albert'F. Hilton, Regional Manager
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 7, 1989
Mr. Robert L. Leonhardt
Route 3, Box 412
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Cherryville Land Application
of Sludge
Permit No. WQ 430
Lincoln County, NC
Dear Mr. Leonhardt:
This Office is in receipt of your request dated February
28, 1989 concerning information regarding the City of
Cherryville's Sludge Land Application Program. According to
your letter, you were referred to this Office by Mr. A. R.
Sharp, Jr., Lincoln County Manager.
September 21, 1988 the City of Cherryville applied for a
non -discharge permit from this Office for a one-time application
of approximately 1.5 million gallons of waste sludge from the
City's wastewater treatment facility. The City submitted the
required testing, analyses, and operations plan with their
application. A site evaluation was made of the proposed sites
by Mr. Michael L. Parker with this Office, and a recommendation
was made for permit issuance. Permit was subsequently issued on
December 12, 1988 (see attached copy). This Permit sets forth
conditions and requirements which the City must adhere to while
implementing this program.
If you have observed any violation of the conditions
contained in the subject Permit, please contact this Office as
soon as possible.
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Robert L. Leonhardt
Page Two
March 7, 1989
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact Mr. Parker or me at 704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: Mr. A. R. Sharp, Jr.
MLP:se
Xly

COUNTY OF LI NCOLN, NORTH CAROLI NA
115 WEST MAIN STREET, 3RD FLOOR CITIZENS CENTER, LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28092
IVATrTD.-
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER c` `_rsoup' 5 ATIM
[phone] Y
February 17, 19149..
Robert L. Leonhardt
Rt. 3 Box 412
Cherryville, NC 28021
Leonhardt:
'`?M U 1 1989
Joe Kiser has requested that I communicate the following
information to you directly.
The liquids that have been disposed
farm and the Leonhardt farm located off
Lincoln County are treated sludge from
Water Treatment Plant.
of on the J. P. Beam
Highway 182 West in
the Cherryville Waste
Mr. Bob Shull with the CWWTP has stated that the City of
Cherryville has a State permit to discharge the sludge on the
properties. The State permit number is 0044440. The City of
Cherryville is allowed to dispose of one million two hundred
fifty thousand gallons on the farms. The Natural Resources and
Community Development Agency in Mooresville has evaluated the
site, and all complaints should be referred to NRCD.
If you have any further questions, or are in need of any
additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
A. R. Sharp, Jr.
County Manager
Joe Kiser, County Commissioner

ID►V►SSON 0>: ENV1FONtAEN1PL �. RSC.;'jEjNrS0' 'i
� .
i
�pORE5Vll1-E'
,gE610NAi �� ;
Rex Gleason
N.C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 905
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
of Chettyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
February 6, 1989
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report -of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in October 1988
by E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:tr

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CORRESPOND TO
EMS Laboratories, Inc
4132 Pompano Street
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
[phone]
REPORT TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
LAGOON UNDERDRAIN
P.O. NUMBER : VERBAL
-----------------------
TEST DESCRIPTION
ANALYTE
-----------------=-------------------------- SAMPLE---------
N.C. Waste Lab Cert. No. 98 EMS SAMPLE : B11920
N.C. Water Lab Cert. No. 37727 REPORT DATE : 10/28/88
S.C. Lab Cert. No. 99011 DATE RECEIVED : 10/13/88
U.S. EPA id 00118 DATE COMPLETE : 10/27/88
------------------------------------ BILL TO ----------------
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116-S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
28021
DESCRIPTION
DATE : 10/12/88
TIME : 8:00 AM
-e---------------------------------------
METHOD DATE ANALYST
RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS
CHLORIDE.........................................SM
407A
CHLORIDE .....................
. 220
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT
180 C ............EPA
160.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ............
: 1,160
CADMIUM, TOTAL .. ..............................EPA
213.1
CADMIUM, TOTAL ...............
. ND
INSTRUMENT ...................
. PE 3030
IRON, TOTAL ............................... ......EPA
236.1
IRON, TOTAL ..................
. 16
INSTRUMENT ...................
i
. PE 3030
..................... .....EPA
LEAD, TOTAL .�
239.1
LEAD, TOTAL ..................
.ND
INSTRUMENT ...................
. PE 3030
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP
EPA
200.0
METALS, DIGEST ...............
: COMPLETE
INITIAL WT OR VOL ............
: 50
FINAL WT OR VOL ..............
. 50
ND - Not Detected
NA - Not Applicable
Sample was accompanied by chain of
custody papers
j Approved by': 0'nrl
10/21/88
5
10/17/88
10
10/21/88
0.01
MK
MG/L
LW
MG/L
LBS
MG/L
10/21/88 LBS
0.05 MG/L
10/20/88 LBS
0.1 MG/L
10/14/88 MR
NA NA
Page 1 of 1

�.. STA7Z
,,
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community. Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain Street
Cherryville; NC 28021
Dear Ms. Hovis :
Paul Wilms
December 12, 1988 Director
TC 5 1988
SUBJECT: Permit No. WQ00:10� 1
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
In accordance with your application received September 21, 1988, we are
forwarding herewith Permit No. WQ0000430, dated Decembe-: 12, 1988, to the City of
Cherryville for the operation of the subject sludge land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be.subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within 30 days following receipt of this permit. This request must
be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Unless such demands are made this
permit shall be final and binding.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If
you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Rosanne
Barona, telephone No. 919/733-5083, ext. 549.
Sincerely,
R. Paul Wilms
cc: Gaston County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Supervisor
Environmental Waste Disposal
Groundwater Section
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

J
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH
P E R M I T
For the discharge of Sewage, Industrial Wastes, or Other Wastes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes
of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of_Cherryville
,Gaston County
FOR THE
operation of a one time application of approximately 1,500,000 gallons of sludge
from the City of Cherryville s wastewater treatment plant to sites identified in
condition No. six (6) of this permit with no discharge to the surface waters of the -
State, pursuant to the application received September 21, 1988, and in conformity
with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed
and approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be subject.to the following specified conditions avid limitations:
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes'
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
3. This permit is not transferable.-
4. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for the life of the project
5. This permit is valid for a one-time application of approximately 1,500,000
gallons of sludge.
6. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between the City of
Cherryville and Mr. -John Beam, Jr. is in full effect, This agreement covers
fields No. one (1) through No. nine (9) with a total of 151.2 acres.

7. field No.-1 shall not be used until March 1, 1989. Fie;=s No. 2 and No. 3 shall
not be used until late Spring, 1989 and with approval from the Mooresville
Regional Office,
8. All buffer areas shall be marked with flagging prior -,:.o sludge application to
insure that sludge application is precluded from these a_eas.
9. Application rates shall not exceed 15,000 gallons per acre.
10. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Envircamental Management to
insure surface and ground water protection will be estab 'shed and an acceptable
sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
11. A suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintainer.
12. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permitt=e of the responsibility
for damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this
facility.
13. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as .a non -discharge
system to prevent the discharge of any wastewater result'-g from the operation of
this facility.
14. No type of sludge other than that from the City of Cherry':ille Wastewater
Treatment Plant shall be placed on the land application disposal site.
15. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind er,asior_ and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application areE onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
16. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or u.:;til 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Emergency sludge disposal
measures shall be approved by_the Division of Environmental Management.
17. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of 6.5 prior 'to sludge
application.
15. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on t--,,ese sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
19.•No .liquid sludge shall be applied by subsurface injection within a 25-foot buffer
zone of any water course or surface drainage area.
20. In any future transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
21. A 50-foot buffer shall be maintained between drainageways, a 100-foot buffer
shall be maintained between each landowner's property lines, and a 400-foot
buffer shall be maintained between any residence and Zny applied sludge.
22. A recorded log of sludge applications including amounts applied, dates, method of
application, and site location shall be maintained by the Permittee as a
permanent record.

rm
23. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced.in immediately after application
on lands with no cover crop established.
24. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the
Department, shall be provided.
25. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and 18%
for subsurface applications.
26. A 100-foot buffer shall be maintained between the appropriate land owner's
property line and any applied sludge.
27. No liquid sludge shall be surface applied within a 100-f00= buffer zone of any
water course or surface drainage area.
Permit issued this the 12th day of December, 1988.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
74- By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. WQ0000430 —

STAtpo
i
. , � �vl ��I ,r ` �r �d°m H#f �NVtR°$Ik1ENt�l MANOCC�takB
VRECEIVED
r Tign 15 loco
J State of North Carolina
DepartmeXhlatural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary December 12, 1988 Director
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
SUBJECT: Permit No. WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
G%as-t dn— County
Dear Ms. Hovis:
In accordance with your application received September 21, 1988, we are
forwarding herewith Permit No. WQ0000430, dated December'12, 1988, to the City of
Cherryville for the operation of the subject'sludge land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within 30 days following receipt of this permit. This request ,.lust
be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Unless such demands are made this
permit shall be final and binding.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If
you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Rosanne
Barona, telephone No. 919/733-5083, ext. 549.
cc:- Gaston County Health Department
Environmental Waste Disposal
Groundwater Section
Sincerely,
R. Paul Wilms
i�
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh; North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

\\1
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH
P E R M I T.
For the discharge of Sewage, Industrial Wastes, or Other Wastes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes
of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Cherryville
Gaston County
FOR THE
operation of a one time application of approximately 1,500,000 gallons of sludge
from the City of Cherryville's wastewater treatment plant to sites identified in
condition No. six (6) of this permit with no discharge to the surface waters of the
State, pursuant to the application received September 21, 1988, and in conformity
with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed
and approved by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1990, and
shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
3. This permit is not transferable. 1
4. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for the life of the project
5. This permit is valid for a one-time application of approximately 1,500,000
gallons of sludge.
6. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between the City of
Cherryville and Mr. John Beam, Jr. is in full effect, This agreement covers
fields No. one (1) through No. nine (9) with a total of 151.2 acres.

J
7. Field No. 1 shall not be used until March 1, 1989. Fields No. 2 and No. 3 shall
not be used until late Spring, 1989 and with approval from the Mooresville
Regional Office,
8. All buffer areas shall be marked with flagging prior to sludge application to
insure that sludge application is precluded from these areas.
9. Application rates shall not exceed 15,000 gallons per acre.
10. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to
insure surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable
sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
11. A suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintained.
12. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility
for damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this
facility.
13. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge
system to prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of
this facility.
14. No type of sludge other than that from the City of Cherryville Wastewater
Treatment Plant shall be placed on the land application disposal site.
15. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind ero-)sion and surface runoff
from conveying pollutants from the sludge application area onto the adjacent
property or into the surface waters.
16. Sludge shall not be applied in inclement weather or u.-;til 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 1/2-inch or greater in 24 hours. Eilergency sludge disposal
measures shall be approved by the Division of Environmental Management.
17. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of 6.5 prior to sludge
application.
18. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period
of 18 months following sludge application.
19. No liquid sludge shall be applied by subsurface injection within a 25-foot buffer
zone of any water course or surface drainage area.
20. In any future transfer of this land, a notice shall be given to the new owner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at this site.
21. A 50-foot buffer shall be maintained between drainageways, a 100-foot buffer
shall be maintained between each landowner's property lines, and a 400-foot
buffer shall be maintained between any residence and Rny applied sludge.
22. A recorded log of sludge applications including amounts applied, dates, method of
application, and site location shall be maintained by the Permittee as a
permanent record.

23. Surface applied sludge will be plowed or disced in immediately after application
on lands with no cover crop established.
24. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring as deemed necessary by the
Department, shall be provided.
25. Maximum slope for sludge application shall be 10% for surface application and 18%
for subsurface applications.
26. A 100-foot buffer shall be maintained between the appropriate land owner's
property line and any applied sludge.
27. No liquid sludge shall be surface applied within a 100-foot buffer zone of any
water course or surface drainage area.
Permit issued this the 12th day of December, 1988.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
"R. Paul Wilms, Director
7zDivision of Environmental Management
- By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. WQ0000430

•: >
Date: November 30, 1988
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Lincoln
WQ No. 430
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
vs4
�W< i � 3
1. Facility and Address: City of Cherryville Sludge Land
Application Sites
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
2. Date of Investigation: November 9, 1988
3. Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environmenta v//
Engineer I
4. Person Contacted;.- Ms.. Grace'Draman; telephone number (919)
998-8184
5. Directions to Site: Please refer to report submitted by
Environmental Waste Disposal (EWD) for specific directions
to sites.
6. Discharge Point: N/A
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate sludge disposal
sites on map (see EWD report)
USGS Quad No.: F 13 NW
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There
is adequate area available for disposal of sludge based on
current sludge generation.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Ranges
from hilly (15+o slopes) to nearly level (1-2o slopes). It
does not appear that any of the proposed sites are located
in a flood plain area.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: There are some dwellings
located less than 300 feet from the disposal sites.
Applicable buffers should be established unless an
agreement is made between the property owner and the City
reducing the minimum distance.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: N/A

1b
Page Two
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF SLUDGE AND OPERATIONS PLAN
1. Type of sludge: 45%* Domestic
55 0* Industrial
*See Part (b)
a. Volume of sludge: 15,000 gal/acre
b. Types and quantities of industrial sludge: Two (2)
industrial dischargers were connected to the
wastewater treatment plant during the period when the vv2
Gas r majority of the excess sludge was generated: Travis ='
Knits (textile) approximately 400,000 gpd and Carolina
Freight ( truck washing) approximately 1,500 gpd. Z0J00,;,
Travis Knits has since eliminated their discharge.
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in sludge: A review of
sludge analysis as submitted by EWD did not reveal any
waste constituents present in levels considered as
being toxic.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Not needed
2. Production Rates (industrial discharges only) in Pounds:
N/A
3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and
Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing):
N/A
5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Sludge will be
transported to the disposal sites in a sealed tanker truck
and then applied either by injection or surface application
depending on the crops.
6. Treatment Plant Classification: N/A
7. SIC Code(s): N/A
Wastewater Code(s): N/A
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring requests: N/A
3. Additional effluent limits requests: N/A
4. Other: N/A

Page Three
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Cherryville proposes to dispose of
approximately 1,500,000 gallons of sludge accumulated at the
City's wastewater treatment plant by land application via either
injection or surface application on sites located in Lincoln
County. The sludge is the result of a clean -out of the various
treatment units at the wastewater treatment plant and is
currently being stored in a lagoon on site. The sludge will be
blended to achieve consistency prior to application.
Three (3) predominant soils are found on the application
sites (Cecil, Pacolet and Gaston) and all exhibit
characteristics which are conducive to the land application of
sludge. Soil depth ranged from 36 to 72 inches and no
restrictive horizons were observed. Soil pH's were noted as
being slightly low, and should be adjusted by liming to a range
considered optimum for the proposed small grain or cover crop.
All of the sites, as submitted by EWD, are currently in small
grain production.
The application rates, as proposed by EWD, are based on
agronomic needs of the crop and on current sludge application
guidelines. The proposed application rate of 15,000
gallons/acre appears suitable.
EWD shall, prior to sludge application, mark all buffered
areas with flagging to insure that sludge application is
precluded from these areas. Field No. l..was observed to have
had an application of agricultural manure just prior to the site
inspection. This field, although suitable for sludge
application, should be bypassed during this one-time sludge
-disposal project due to the inability of predicting nutrient
loading from the agricultural application. Approval of this
site for disposal is recommended although its use should be
suspended until at least March 1, 1989. Fields No. 2 and No. 3
were recently planted with small grain and it appears they will
not be available for use until late Spring, 1989.
Pending further review from the ERG and Groundwater
Section, it is recommended that a non -discharge permit be
issued.
Signature ofLkeport Preparer
Water Quality Reg -Zonal Supervisor

} Ai
yr
@ 1p:3a
RECEIVEO
$IVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL M
ANAgEIIEW
RWORE , State of North Carolina
Departmei�n;atural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor f r,
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Date:
,i
, 1 r
Dear t1= )
SUBJECT: Application No
APN
R. Paul Wilms
Director
J
' • ` County
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit
application and supporting materials on 19' This application
has been assigned the number shown above. Please refer to this number when making
inquiries on this project.
Your project has been assigned to # `\ i f ; +" L_ for a
detailed engineering review. A technical acknowledgement will be forthcoming. If
this acknowledgement is not received within thirty (30) days, please contact the
engineer listed above.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide
recommendations from the Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this
project, prior to final action by the Division.
If you have any questions, please call the review engineer listed above at
[phone].
Sincerely,
°`•'Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
y Supervisor, Permits and Engineering
cc: j'� �' Regional Supervisor
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empbyer

ee-
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Environmental Management Commission
• 's
- wrnwr nrc�rr � nn'n nr�TlliT ♦ nnr r� . mrnwra
1�
D E M USE ONLY
Permit Number.:,
......................�. _ .�....... ... ot. .........,..
County:
* in ,accordance with N.C. General Statutes Chapter 143, Article 21
tC c1. S ; C n
Applicant (name of board, individual, or others):?=
Application Date:
1l.k%11Ce i1,ovia _, CitrT !'i_i.naL,ur°
Project (name of city, village,town, sanitary district, establishment):
t
ortl, Carolina
FOR:
Brief Project Description:
❑ Non -Discharge Treatment/Disposal Facilities
❑ Pretreatment Facilities
i s �T_ R
Agriculturalli$:a..�..�:e;;ation tl.. r uj(h
❑ Sewer Collection System (private)
'-{•ppiJeation Of approximately
,31udg-e
❑ Sewer and Sewer Systems (public)
gallons of culrront,ly `
,Extend
lapoor at 1J4..)-e 1'Vaot.e iCOY' T2'i.'atv)4Yl"L
NATURE OF WASTEWATER:
" rli
Sewage
Sludge/Industrial Waste
Other Waste
From (sewers, pretreatment facilities, treatment plants) : Ser'.ving77(city, institution, industry):
{{l1
Into (name of treatment plant): Tributary To (name of water course):
At (location of treatment plant):
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: Zip Code: Telephone No.
d°' >"'oianen l' i"<st e L DIC . . � . fox 1..1 9 Cc, " T 1i ) r,:> Ora,
_
Treatment Works Capacity to Serve (name of project): For (no. yrs.) Average Daily Gallons Sewage"or Waste Flow:
1 r -
Affect"Overall Reduction in Pollution (not applicable for sewer projects):
Estimated Costs:
Toxic Materials (specify % each, add pages if needed)
B.O. D. (5-day 2f1� C) %
NT ✓ A %
Sewers $
Pumping
Suspended Solids %
%
Station 8
Treatment
TOTAL SOLIDS %
Ri / 0 %
Plant $
%.
Other (specify)
$
Estimated Completion Date:
Coliform Bacteria %
NV TOTAL TOXIC MATERIALS %
Applicant assures that proposed works, will be constructed, supervised, operated and maintained in accordance with approved plans and
specifications or approved changes thereto.,
Print Name:- Title: Mailing Address: Zip Code. °
J,ZilliCe tIov -; City r`arlac? ,,e:r 1. S. t,;tountcain : t.
Telephone No.
Signature:
ter.
0 c'.'
INSTRUCTIONS: —"
1. Fill-in,/ALL spaces. If not applicable, enter N/A.
2. Secure appropriate signature (mayor/city manager for municipality; chairman for sanitary district board; owner/proper official of corporation;
or legally constituted board or commission in charge of proposed works). A letter of authorization is required from proper official if
design engineer or other agent signs application.
3. Submit to N.C. Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,, Environmental Management, Raleigh, NC, the
original and first copy of application, 2 sets of finalized plans, specifications and other, supporting data as required by Commission Rules.
NOTE: Application reviews are scheduled on receipt of COMPLETE information. Generally, 30 days are required for pollution abatement projects; 90 days
for other projects
'"For Assistance, call the State Central Office 919/733-5083, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. or:
*Asheville [phone] 'Mooresville [phone] 'Washington [phone] *Winston-Salem [phone]
159 Woodfin Street 919 North Main Street 1502 North Market Street 8003,Silas Creek Parkway Extension
Asheville, NC 28801 Mooresville, NC 28115 Washington, NC 27889 "'Nifiston-Salem, NC 27106
*Fayetteville [phone] *Raleigh [phone] *Wilmington [phone]
Suite 714 Wachovia Building Box 27687 7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Fayetteville, NC 28301 Raleigh, NC 27611 Wilmington, NC 28403

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RE-C'EIVIE0 GROUNDWATER SECTION
GlYl�q i�€ �NVtrib7t�tEPliRi �tttu6E��i8
November 16, 1988
MEV=%YM
TO: Arthuz Mouberry
L
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM: Bill Reid
r *
SUBJECT: City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge
Gaston County
WQ0000430/GW88249
(Rosanne Barona: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit
application and recommends issuance of the permit with the
following conditions:
(1) Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed
necessary by the Department, shall be provided.
MC/tej
cc: Rex Gleason/Eric Klingel
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

Environmental Waste Disposal, Inc.
P.O. Box 845 • Clemmons, NC 27012 • [phone]
Mr. Michael,D. Cleary
Groundwater Section
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
Re: Application for Permit City of Cherryville
Land Application of Sludge, Gaston County
Dear Mike:
I am writing in response to your request for additional
information regarding the application for permit for the one
time only land application project for the City of Cherry-
ville submitted September 21, 1988.
Several hand auger borings were advanced on each field
to -verify the soil classification, as indicated on the Lincoln
County Soil Conservation Service Survey. I.hay.e attached a
copy of the field report transcribed from recordings taken at
the field,Iin.dicating the soil description to at least the
"C" horizon. The site and soils evaluation indicates that
the predominate soil series found on the sites are Cecil,
Pacolet, and Gaston and the predominate soil texture is sandy
clay loam as .indicated in the section labeled "Evaluation" in
the application for permit. The Cation Exchange Capacity of
the soils for each field is included on the "Soil Analysis
Report" n.the section labeled "Soils Info" in the
app--1'ic.ation for permit.
The "Soils Info" section also contains descriptions of
Cecil,.Pacolet,'and,Gaston..soils' These soil series ,are well
drained and moderately pei;meabl.e. The proposed application
sites are well suited for land..application'.of sludge and the
proposed apphi'cation rate' of 15,000 gallons- per ,acre is .well
within:.`an` acceptable range:
The, site 'arrd. soil' evaluation was ;conducted by Mr. B. D.
Boger Mr.. Boger .has' over. 20 years experience ' as a
profession agriculturalitt'and, over I years experience in
land application of, sludge :'Over' the. year's :"he' bias!. attended
several classes,_,at North Carolina :State Uni.ver.sity r:egar.d` ng':
soils and agronomy. He has worked .with,';.Agricultural
Extension Agents and the Soil'- Cons 6rvation,Service'of several

qualifies his as a soil scientist as.specified in the
Administrative Code Section: '15NCAC 2H .0200 Waste Not
Discharged to Surface ii'aters, dated. August 1, 1988: AIr
Boger's=.evaluation of.the.proposed application sites. 'is
attached.
I -have -also-attached copies_::of-: th -
wells located within 500-feet'of the proposed sites
prominently indicated.
Please contact me immediately if you have any questions
or require any further information.
This sludge removal and land application project is
scheduled to be completed this fall. I have arranged a site
review for Wednesday November 9, 1988. Please let me know if
there is anything I can do to facilitate a timely review of
our request so that we can complete this project this fall.
Respectfully submitted,
i2��r.Cti�J
Grac-e Draman,'
President

m
!!I!Vnviron mental Waste Disposal, Inc.
P.O. Box 845 • Clemmons, NC 27012 • [phone]
Cherryville, North Carolina
Site Evaluation
Field Report
Several hand auger borings were advanced on the
sites, to verify the soil classifications as determined
by the Lincoln County Soil Conservation Service Soil
Survey. The results of the auger borings are attached.
My investigation indicates that the predominate soil
series of these sites are Cecil, Gaston and Pacolet
soils. These soil types are well drained and moderately
permeable and are well suited for this land application
program. The proposed application rate.of 15,000
gallons per acre is acceptable and if properly
implemented will offer beneficial nutrients and -soil
amenders.
B. D. Bog r
Site Review Specialist

I
Field Report
Depth Soil Description
0- 7" Brown sandy loam; weak medium granular structure;
very friable; many fine and medium roots; few
pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; clear smooth
boundary.
7-11" Yellowish red sandy clay loam; weak fine sub -
angular blocky structure; friable; few fine and
medium roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
11-28" Red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thick distinct
clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of
mica; few small pebbles of quarts; strongly acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
28-40" Red clay; moderate and weak medium, subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thin clay films on
faces of peds; few to common fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
40-50" Red clay loam; common medium distinct strong brown
mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few clay films on vertical faces of peds;
common fire flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
50-72" Mottled red, strong brown and pale brown saprolite
of gneiss mixed with clay loam; massive; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid.
0- 9" Brown sandy loam;
very friable; many
pebbles of quartz;
boundary.
weak medium granular structure;
fine and medium roots; few
strongly acid; clear smooth
9-13" Yellowish red sandy clay loam; weak fine sub -
angular blocky structure;, friable; few fine and
medium roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
13-28" Red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky;. -plastic; thick dis.tinct
clay films on facesof peds; few fine.flakes of
mica; few small pebbles of .quarts; strongly acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
28-42 Red clay; moderate and weak medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thin clay films on
faces of peds; few to common fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary..
42-50" Red clay loam; common medium distinct strong brown
. mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;

Field Report
Pg. 2
Depth
Soil Description
friable: few clay- films on vertical faces of peds;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
50-72" Mottled red, strong brown and pale brown saprolite
of gneiss mired with clay loam; massive; friable;
common fine flakes of mi-ca; strongly acid.
0- 8" Brown sandy- loam;
very friable; many
pebbles of quartz;
boundary.
weak medium granular structure;
fine and medium roots; few
strongly acid; clear smooth
8-12" Yellowish red sandy clay- loam; weak fine sub -
angular blocky structure; friable; few fine and
medium roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
12-27" Red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thick distinct
clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of
mica; few small pebbles of quarts; strongly acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
27-40" Red clay; moderate and weak medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thin clay films on
faces of peds; few to common fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
40-51" Red clay loam; common medium distinct strong brown
mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few clay films on vertical faces of peds;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
51-72" Mottled red, strong brown and pale brown saprolite
of gneiss mixed with clay loam; massive; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid.
0- 7" Brown sandy loam; weak medium granular structure;
very friable;.many fine and medium roots; few
pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; clear smooth
boundary.
7-12" Yellowish red sandy clay loam; weak fine sub -
angular blocky structure; friable; few fine and
medium roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.

Field Report
Pg. 3
.Depth Soil Description
z12-30" Red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thick distinct
clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of
mica; few small pebbles of quartz; strongly acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
30-43" Red clay; moderate and weak medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; thin clay films on
faces of peds; few to common fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
42-52" Red clay loam; common medium distinct strong brown
mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few clay films on vertical faces of peds;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual
smooth boundary.
52-72" Bottles red, strong brown and pale brown saprolite
of gneiss mixed with clay loam; massive; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; strongly acid.
0- 7" Dark reddish brown; yellowish red dry; sandy clay
loam, weak medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary.
7-14" Dark red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and
few medium roots; common distinct clay firm; sticky,
plastic; common distinct clay films on faces of
peds; few black streaks; moderately acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
14-52" Red clay; few medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine roots;
common distinct clay films on faces of peds; few
fine flakes ,of mica; few black streaks; moderately
acid; clear wavy boundary.
52-57 Red clay loam; common medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles; weak medium subangular-blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; -common
fine flakes.of mica; few pockets of weathered black
minerals; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary.
57-72" Red, yellowish red, and yellowish brown saprolite
that.crushes easily to loam; rock controlled
structure; common black specks and streaks; common
fine,flakes of mica; moderately acid.

Field Report
Pg. 4
Depth Soil Description
0- 7" Dark reddish brown; yellowish red dry; sandy clay
loam, weak medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots, slightly acid; clear smooth boundary.
7-14" Dark red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and
few medium roots; common distinct clay firm; sticky,
plastic; common distinct clay films on faces of
peds; few black streaks; moderately acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
14-52" Red clay; few medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: moderate medium subangular blocky
structure: firm; sticky, plastic; common fire roots;
common distinct clay films on faces of peds; few
fine flakes of mica; few black streaks: moderately
acid; clear ,+navy boundary.
52-57" Red clay loam; common medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common
fine flakes of mica; few pockets of weathered black
minerals; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary.
57-7/2" Red, yellowish red, and yellowish brown saprolite
that crushes easily to loam; rock controlled
structure; common black specks and streaks; common
fine flakes of mica; moderately acid.
0- 6" Dark reddish brown; yellowish red dry; sandy clay
loam, weak medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary.
6-12" Dark red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and
few medium roots; common distinct clay firm; sticky,
plastic; common distinct clay films on faces of
peds; few black streaks; moderately acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
12-50" Red clay; few medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic;.common fine roots;
common distinct clay films on faces,of peds; few
fine flakes of mica; few black streaks; moderately
acid; clear wavy boundary.
50-56" Red clay loam.; common medium distinct reddish yellow
.mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common
fine flakes of mica; few pockets.of weathered black
minerals; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary.

Field Report
pg. 5
Depth Soil Description
56-72" Red, yellowish red, and yellowish brown saprolite
that crushes easily to loam; rock controlled
Str :...,i.iire ; COmiT:v:: brae Spc�z-.5 ;Z lit.. S ti :azi5 Cvm�:.on
fine flakes of mica; moderately acid.
0- 5" Dark reddish brown; yellowish red dry; sandy clay
loam, Tweak medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots; slightly acid; clear smooth. boundary.
Dark red clay; moderate medium subangular block;-
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and
few medium roots; common distinct clay- firm; sticky,
plastic; common distinct clay films on faces of
peds; few black streaks; moderately acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
13-2" Rid clay; few medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: moderate medium subangular blocky-
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fire roots;
common distinct clay films on faces of pods; few
fine flakes of mica; few black streaks; moderately
acid; clear ,wavy boundary.
40-57" Red clay loam; common medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles; ;weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common
fine flakes of mica; few pockets of weathered black
minerals; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary.
57-72" Red, yellowish red, and yellowish brown saprolite
that crushes easily to loam; rock controlled
structure; common black specks and streaks; common
fine flakes of mica; moderately acid.
0- 7" Dark reddish brown; yellowish red dry; sandy- clay
loam, weak medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary.
7-13" Dark red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and
few medium roots; common distinct clay- firm; sticky,
plastic; common distinct clay films on faces of
peds; few black streaks; moderately acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
13-50" Red clay; few medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine roots;
common distinct clay films on faces of peds; few
fine flakes of mica; few black streaks; moderately
acid; clear wavy boundary.

r iICe. d ; n : C; P O I' -�
P,� o
Do. P til Soil. Description
Red clay ioant; common medium distinct reddish yellow
mottles: •v�ak medium subangular blocky structure;
fri.abl.e-; ,lightly sticky, sli--fitly plastic; common
fine. flakes of mica; few pocket of weathered black
mine: call , mode ra" e1. 1- :Yc id , clear wad--: bo und'a ry.
, , l
_ Red. yello:t isil i-ed , and 1 1, ? o �- C` �Otti i J1� Uro;vYl Sap1'o _ 1 t _
flat crust-i .asi.ly to loam, rock dontroIIC!d
StY'uCtLlr<� ,,;7T111Tion b c c ' r, ,,�
.1 , Spc:Cz1� ari re _ in in on
f7Yle l lEl. kfs.s mica; moderate--11 aCid
i- z Ois,1 Ca,lC�%
CE•ii i_- I
_ < -Ct,l a
Crit1 i; i'3c
ino%tI e.!- mioerai.e mCdl i ; n ffra;iLitI a,. StrLlctLir_ ,
lc::bic- ..,,=;-1 r.�i1r_'. and medium io�-,ts. str �ngi�- acid;
�,.,-ada.i'y.
Red clay, moderate medium subangulal blocky
,_
StrL.iCt.urC'; Tii'in, S lgltlt sticky : thin con tl2"il.loll5
faint clav .films on faces of p:cds; common_ fine and
medium roots ; c•Cmmoli ery f iile pores ; in .diLlm acid ;
gradual wary boundary.
`o off„
Clay , common fine distinct ^:?<A —I11 � ellOii'
mottles, moderate medium subangular blocky structure;
firm. s1stick:: ; thin cont- inluous faint clay
films on faces of peels; common very fine pores : e;v
i ine f lake_ o f inica , i s?di uill acid- -"radua-1
tav\
Cd cla- I-ainmany disiincresh�� .Cdi
42-5 51 ' Mottled End redldisn yellow loam, massive,
friable; thin discontinuous distinct clay films
in crack; few fine flakes of mica; 75 percent
soft saprolite that crushes easily.-; strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary.
55-IL Light yellowish brown loam; common medium distinct
red and strong brown mottles; massive; friable;
90 percent soft saprolite that crushes easily;
strongly acid.
0- 5" Brown sandy loam; few fine distinct yellowish red
mottles; moderate medium granular structure;
friable; many fine and medium roots; strongly acid;
clear wavy boundary,

7 i e l d "IZc! t
£z. 2
2. %oil D s,crigfioR
5-25" Red clay; moderate medium subangular blocky structure:
firm, slightly sticky: thin coeli=sous £Biel clef
film= on faces of 2ms ice- = Tiee 0,172 medium coots:
common very fine gores; medium acid; gradual wavy
boe=2aif.
2S-3)2" Red clay; common fine distinct reddish yellow
mottles; moderate medium subangular blocky structure;
firm, sliEEtlz slic«z; ±Sin cue±ie000s fain% clan
films on feces of Zeds; ebmmon sezz fine »oyes: few
. £ire £lakes of mica; medium acid: zre3oal wevz
boundary. .
02-43" ReJ clan loam; many medium dnct :ea34sb yellow
mottles; wear medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few rise £lades of mica; slzoczlz acid;
-radoal wevz bo9=2ary.
43-SG" Mottled red and zeda'ish yellow loam; massive;
f«iabl\; %hie aiscoaliaU( disli&ct clay films
iG czac2s; few fine flakes of mica: 75 percent
soft sat«oli±e %Sat crushes easily; strongly acid;
--a£ual wavy boeoda»7.
5G-72" ti«5± zello=ish brown loam; common medium distinct
oed aria slzosE brown mottles; massive; friable;
90 percent soft sa2£o14te that .crushes easily;
strongly acid.

40
A.'
Aek

I V
y
MS
p 44—
VC
w4'
te
.4:: Lod

Rex Gleason
N.C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 905
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
City of Chenyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
November 1, 1988
N. C. DEPT. OF NATiTj1 jL
RESOUF? :F, AND
COMIUUNIT'Y DEVF,:0PAfENT
NOV 0 7 1988
DIVISION OF ENVIROii ETA [if111AGE11lH
%10ORESVIElE at-.'C jjP.L U;fIC1:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in July 1988
by E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
Uesww;#

CERTIFICATE
OF ANALYSIS
F—CORRESPOND TO -----------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE
----------
EMS Laboratories, Inc
N.C.
Waste Lab Cert. No.
98 EMS SAMPLE :
B10311
4132 Pompano Street
N.C.
Water Lab Cert. No.
37727 REPORT DATE :
08/11/88
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
S.C.
Lab Cert. No. 99011
DATE RECEIVED :
07/28/88
[phone]
U.S.
EPA id 00118
DATE COMPLETE :
08/10/88
REPORT TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
DESCRIPTION
SLUDGE LAGOON
P.O. NUMBER :
BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
28021
DATE : 7/26/88
TIME : 8:00 AM
TEST DESCRIPTION
METHOD
DATE
ANALYST
ANALYTE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULT
DET. LIMIT
UNITS
�
CHLORIDE ... ............. ..............SM
407A
08/04/88
JW
CHLORIDE...........
.221
5
MG/L
NITROGEN, NITRITE ............... ..............EPA
353.2
07/29/88
JW
N, NITRITE .........
.2.2
0.01
MG/L
NITROGEN, NITRATE. ............ ..............EPA
353.3
08/02/88
JW
-NITROGEN, NITRATE ..
: 9.5
0.01
MG/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT
180 C ............EPA
160.1
08/05/88
JW
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ..
1050
10
MG/L
CADMIUM, TOTAL ..................... .............EPA
213.1
08/03/88
LBS
CADMIUM, TOTAL .....
: 0.01
0.01
MG/L
INSTRUMENT .........
: PE 3030
........... ... ............EPA
IRON, TOTAL .��
236.1
08/03/88
LBS
IRON, TOTAL ........ .0.2
0.01
MG/L
INSTRUMENT ......... :
PE 3030
LEAD, TOTAL ................................EPA
239.1
08/04/88
LBS
LEAD, TOTAL ........ :
ND
0.1
MG/L
INSTRUMENT ......... :
PE 3030
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP ....................EPA
200.0
07/29/88
MR
METALS, DIGEST ..... :
COMPLETE
NA
NA
INITIAL WT OR VOL .. :
50
Page 1 of 2

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salishl,ry Street O Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, secretary
GROUNDWATER SECTION
November 1, 1988
Mrs. Janice Hovis, City Manager
116 S. Mountain Street
Cherryville, NC 28021
�r Hovis:
SUBJECT: City --of,, Cherryville
Land Apppl-ication of
Gaston Coun_ty-
WQ0000430/GW88249_
�f
Slude y
R. Paul Wilms
Director
As part of the Division of Environmental Management's
comprehensive approach in addressing the impact of waste
treatment, storage, or disposal projects on the environment,
your permit application has been forwarded to us for assessment
of the potential impact of the project on groundwater quality.
Our initial review indicates that the data submitted is
not sufficient to make this assessment.
Before your application can be processed, you are re-
quested to submit the following information to the Groundwater
Section. This information should be submitted in full within 60
days of the date of this letter. Failure to comply may result
in the returning of this application as incomplete.
1. A soil evaluation of the disposal site, conducted
by a soils scientist, down to the top of the "C"
horizon (and deeper if necessary to adequately
describe the soils to be utilized for treatment
and disposal). This evaluation should include,
but is not limited to, texture, porosity, color,
total thickness, restrictive horizons, cation
exchange capacity, the presence or absence of
evidence of any seasonal high water table, 'and
recommendations concerning application rates of
the waste.
2. Information as to the presence or absence of any
Pollu!ion Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

wells located within 500 feet of the principal
waste treatment/disposal facility. Any such wells
should be accurately located on the site map, and
labeled as to their primary usage (ie. drinking
water, monitoring, etc.).
Please feel free to contact the Groundwater Section, at
[phone], if clarification or information is required.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Cleary
Hydrogeologist
Permits Group
JWR/tej
cc: Rex Gleason
Rosanne Barona
Mike Cleary
Grace Draman
Environmental Waste Disposal
P.O. Box 845
Clemmons, NC 27012
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Er,'c KI,'nyel
DATE: /0//3 f 8 r
FROM: Bill Reid
SUBJECT: Application
GROUNDWATER SECTION
QU.
for Renewal/Amendment
New Permit
of Permit No.
Facility Name Ci�x or aebr-yh/r'lle
County
Type of Project a�d �frpl na on 6� uclye
Applicable Permit Numbers : WQ 0000,Y30 GW $•fir a y�
EPA
AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your regional office for comment on or about
oc�ober // _r 1988.
You should review the application package for completeness and
adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
QC&4P-r a � , 1988 so that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at one time. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will be
provided to you.
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, youshould
review the application package and submit your comments to me by
J' Allyt�+.Ge a 3 1988.
If a copy of the application package has not been made
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that a
copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
MDC/APPMEMO -

61 City of Chenyvitle
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
RECIEIVEEF
4IVI3
I0
N Of ENVIRON6IENTAL MMASEY
AUG 8, s988
UNRir VILLE
SFGIONAL Oftp
Rex Gleason
N. C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box:�905
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in April.by
E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact meat the above
address.
Yours truly,
P___V M"/,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:tr

CERTIFICATE
OF ANALYSIS
— CORRESPOND TO -----------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE
--------
EMS SLaboratories, Inc
N.C. Waste
Lab�Cert. No. 98
EMS SAMPLE
: B8717
4132 Pompano Street
N.C. Water
Lab Cert. No. 37727
REPORT DATE
: 05/03/88
Charlotte, N. Carolina 28216
S.C. Lab Cert.
No. 99011
DATE RECEIVED
: 04/20/88
[phone]
U.S. EPA id
00118
DATE COMPLETE
: 04/29/88
---------------- REPORT TO ---------------------------------------
BILL TO ---------------
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN
ST.
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE
NC 28021
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
--------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
-------------------=-----------------
SLUDGE LAGOON
UNDERDRAIN
DATE SAMPLED
: 4/18/88
TIME SAMPLED
: 8:00 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST DESCRIPTION
METHOD
DATE ANALYST
ANALYTE
----------------------------------------------------=-------------------------------------
RESULT
DET. LIMIT
UNITS
I I
CHLORIDE .. .. ...............
.............EPA
325.3
04/28/88
JC
CHLORIDE ...........
.�179�
5
MG/L
NITROGEN, NITRITE .............................EPA
354.1
04/22/88
JW
N, NITRITE ..........0.05
0.01
MG/L
NITROGEN, NITRATE .. ........
................EPA
353.3
04/22/88
JW
NITROGEN, NITRATE ..
6.63
0.01
MG/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT 180 C ............EPA
160.1
04/27/88
JC
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ..
10
MG/L
CHROMIUM, TOTAL ....... ............
..............EPA
218.1
04/21/88
MR
CHROMIUM,TOTAL ....
: ND
0.03
MG/L
INSTRUMENT .........
: PE 3030E
IRON, TOTAL ....... ..........
..........EPA
236.1
04/28/88
LBS
IRON, TOTAL ........
&am
0.05
MG/L
INSTRUMENT .........
: PE 3030B
LEAD, TOTAL ...... ...........
� ...............EPA
239.1
04/26/88
LBS
LEAD, TOTAL ........
.ND
0.1
MG/L
INSTRUMENT .........
: PE 3030B
ACID DIGESTION FOR FAA OR ICP
....................EPA
200.0
04/21/88
LBS
METALS DIGEST ......
: COMPLETE
NA
NA
ND - Not Detected
Page 1 of 2

EMS SAMPLE : B8717
TEST DESCRIPTION
ANALYTE
METHOD DATE ANALYST
RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS
NA - Not Applicable
Sample was accompanied by chain of custody papers
Approved by : jwivv� CM6 Page 2 of 2

City
c�
RECEIVED,
WdGdN OF ENVIRONMENTAL MMOM
MAY 21 1
MOORESVILLE
IiEt110NAL' QEI�
Rex Gleason r
N. C.. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P. 0. Box 905.
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
of
Chejuyvilte
176 South Mountain Street
NORTH
CAROLINA 28021
April 29, 1988
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in January by
E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at the above
address.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Plant
RCJ:tr

DIRECT INQUIRIES TO :
EMS LABORATORIES, INC.
4132 POMPANO STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
N.C. WASTE LAB CERT. NO. 98
N.C. WATER LAB CERT. NO. 37727
S.C. LAB CERT.. NO. 99011
U.S. EPA ID. 00118
REPORT TO :
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
FINAL REPORT ON SAMPLE : B7164 00
DATE RECEIVED : 01/21/88 DATE COMPLETE : 01/29/88
DESCRIPTION 1 : SLUDGE LAGOON UNDERDRAIN
DESCRIPTION 2 :
DATE SAMPLED : 1/19/88 TIME SAMPLED -: 8:00 AM
BILL TO :
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
TEST DESCRIPTION RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYST DATE
CHLORIDE ......................................... 184
NITROGEN, NITRITE ................................ 0.025
NITROGEN, NITRATE ................................ 4.81
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT 180 C ............ 852
CADMIUM, TOTAL ................................... ND,
INSTRUMENT ......... : PE 560 FAA
IRON, TOTAL ...................................... 0.23
INSTRUMENT ......... : PE 560 FAA
LEAD, TOTAL ...................................... ND
INSTRUMENT ......... : PE 560 FAA
METALS DIGESTION .................................. COMPLETE
INITIAL WT OR VOL .. : 100
5
MG/L
APHA
407A
NVD
O1/21/88
0.01
MG/L
EPA
354.1
NVD
O1/22/88
0.01
MG/L
EPA
353.3
NVD.
01/22/88
10
MG/L
EPA
160.1
JC
O1/25/88
0.0025
MG/L
EPA
213.1
CG
O1/27/88
0.0025
MG/L
EPA
236.1
CG
O1/28/88
0.025
MG/L
EPA
239.1
CG
O1/25/88
NA
NA
EPA
200.0
LBS
O1/22/88`
PAGE 1 OF 2

k
:1
City
o Chenyville
�
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
ri/ED
January 25, 1988
IENTAL MANAGEME1111
1988
NESVILLE
Mr. Rex Gleason
N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 905
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drain system on our Sludge Storage Lagoon, performed in October by
E.M.S. Laboratories.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 704/435-4181.
Yours truly,
44 Cal
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastetreatment Facilities
RCJ:tr

DIRECT INQUIRIES TO :
EMS LABORATORIES, INC.
4132 POMPANO STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
N.C. WASTE LAB CERT. NO. 98
N.C. WATER LAB CERT. NO. 37727
S.C. LAB CERT. NO. 99011
U.S. EPA ID 00118
REPORT TO :
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.-
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
FINAL REPORT ON SAMPLE : B5582 00
DATE RECEIVED : 10/14/87 DATE COMPLETE : 11/02/87
DESCRIPTION 1 : SLUDGE LAGOON UNDERDRAIN
DESCRIPTION 2 :
DATE SAMPLED : 10/13/87 TIME SAMPLED : 10:00 AM
BILL TO :
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
TEST DESCRIPTION
RESULT
DET. LIMIT
UNITS
_ METHOD
ANALYST
DATE
CHLORIDE .........................................
NITROGEN, NITRITE
280.0
0.2
5
MG/L
APHA
407A
NVD
10/15/87
................................
0.01
MG/L
EPA
354.1
NVD
10/16/87
NITROGEN, NITRATE ................................
1.6
0.01
MG/L
EPA
353.3
NVD
10/16/87
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED AT 180 C ............
1,126
10
MG/L
EPA
160.1
JC
10/27/87
CADMIUM, TOTAL ...................................
ND
0.002
MG/L
EPA
213.1
MR
10/28/87
INSTRUMENT .........
PE 560 FAA
IRON, TOTAL ......................................
0.02
0.002
MG/L
EPA
236.1
MR
10/30/87
INSTRUMENT .........
PE 560 FAA
LEAD, TOTAL ......................................
ND
0.002
MG/L
EPA
239.1
JK
10/27/87
INSTRUMENT .........
PE 560 FAA
METALS DIGESTION .................................
COMPLETE
NA
NA
EPA
200.0
MR
10/22/87`
INITIAL WT OR VOL ..
100
PAGE 1 OF 2

FINAL REPORT ON SAMPLE NO. : B5582 00
TEST DESCRIPTION RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYST DATE
FINAL WT OR VOL .... : 20
ND - ANALYTE NOT DETECTED AT DETECTION LIMIT INDICATED
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
ED BY :09i�l-dl
PAGE 2 OF 2

AD n y
E, 'E E0
7p,,W10N OF ENV1RDNb1E,U7AL 1,i8.ND,GEU"EX•'
: P 1987
i,; 'RESVILLE
. . Tihl 0TY199
Mr. Rex Gleason
N. C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Of
C64yville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
September 29, 1987
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drainage system on our sludge storage lagoon, performed in July..by
EMS Laboratories.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
me at [phone].
Yours truly,
R�a
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatment Plants
RCJ:tr
Enclosures

DIRECT INQUIRIES TO :
FINAL REPORT
ON SAMPLE
B3858 00
\
EMS LABORATORIES, INC.
DATE RECEIVED
: 07/22/87
DATE COMPLETE :
08/13/87
4132 POMPANO STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. CAROLINA 28216
DESCRIPTION 1
: SLUDGE LAGOON
UNDERDRAIN
[phone]
DESCRIPTION 2
:
DATE'.SAMPLED
: 7/20/87
TIME SAMPLED :
10:00 AM
N.C. WASTE LAB CERT. NO.
98
N.C. WATER LAB CERT. NO.
37727
S.C. LAB CERT. NO. 99011
U.S. EPA ID 00118
REPORT TO :
BILL TO
MR. RALPH CHILDERS
RM.
RALPH CHILDERS
CITY OF CHERRYVILLE
CITY
OF CHERRYVILLE
CHERRYVILLE WWTP
116
S. MOUNTAIN ST.
116 S. MOUNTAIN ST.
CHERRYVILLE NC
28021
CHERRYVILLE NC
28021
TEST DESCRIPTION
RESULT
DET.
LIMIT UNITS
METHOD
ANALYST
DATE
CHLORIDE ... ................................... 161
5
MG/L
APHA 407A
JW
07/24/87
NITROGEN, NITRITE ................................
0.1
0.01
MG/L
EPA 354.1
JW
07/23/87
NITROGEN, NITRATE ................................
ND
0.01
MG/L
EPA 353.3
JW
07/23/87
TOTAL_DISSOLVED SOLIDS DRIED
AT 180 C ............
947
10
MG/L
EPA 160.1
JW
07/22/87
CADMIUM, TOTAL .........................
......... ND
0.01
MG/L
EPA 213.1
MR
07/27/87
INSTRUMENT
......... : PE 360
FAA
IRON, TOTAL ......................................
0.8
0.01
MG/L
EPA 236.1
MR
08/04/87
INSTRUMENT
......... : PE 360
FAA
LEAD, TOTAL ......................................
ND
0.05
MG/KG
EPA 239.1
MR
07/24/87
INSTRUMENT
......... : PE 360
FAA
METALS DIGESTION ................................. COMPLETE
NA
ML
EPA 200.0
MR
07/22/87
INITIAL WT
OR VOL .. : NA
PAGE 1 OF 2
L
EMS

TEST DESCRIPTION
FINAL REPORT ON SAMPLE NO. : B3858 00
RESULT DET. LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYST DATE
FINAL WT OR VOL .... : NA
ND - ANALYTE NOT DETECTED AT DETECTION LIMIT INDICATED
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
APPROVED BY
EMS
PAGE 2 OF 2
I

O
Chenyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
July 14, 1987
P aysoy��.�
�1N1S10N OF ENVIRONMENTAL
TpO�a:NIILF
�a
Mr. Rex Gleason
N. C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
drainage system on our sludge storage lagoon, performed in April by
EMS Laboratories.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
me at (7o4)435-4184.
Yourstruly,
12,-I 6LU, a '
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatment Plants
RCJ:tr
Enclosures

EMS Laboratories, Inc.
4132 POMPANO DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
REPORT DATE 4/ Z4/ d /
EMS SAMPLE # 2640
P.O. #
SAMPLE SOURCES WASTEWATER X
Cherryville WWTP SLUDGE
BILL TO: City of Cherryville OIL
116 South Mountain St.
Cherryville, NC 28021 LEACHATE
ATTN: Mr. Ralph Childers, Jr.
OTHER
DATE RECEIV
SAMPLE TYPE _GRAB _COM
DATE SAMPLED 4/14/87
COLLECTED BY Woods
REMARKS
Sludge Lagoon Underdrain
PARAMETER
RESULTS
DATE ANALYZED
ANALYST
Total Dissolved Solids
589.
4/20
DF
Chloride, Cl
111.
4/16
DF
Nitrate-Nitrogen,NO3-N
1.3
4/21
DF
Nitrite-Nitrogen,N)2-N
2.8
4/21
DF
Cadmium, Cd
0.005
4/22
DF
Lead, Pb
ND @ <0.05
4/22
DF
Iron, Fe
0.03
4/23
DF
All results reported in mg/l unless otherwise noted.
ND - Analyte not detected at detection limit indicated.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
160.1
325.3
353.3
354.1
213.1
239.1
236.1
DATA REVIEWED BY: %dJ41- REPORT COPY

City
RF-CF-IVED-
.OJVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANArE4F9
MAY 1 1987
MOORESVILLE
AESIONRL OFFICS
Mr. Rex Gleason
N. C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
of
Chettyville
116 South
Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28621
April
30, 1987
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under
'drainage system on our sludge storage lagoon, performed in March by
EMS Laboratories.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
me at [phone].
Yours truly,
4A
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatment Plants
RCJ:tr
Enclosure

EMS Laboratories, Inc.
4132 POMPANO DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
SAMPLE SOURCES
Cherryville 1,AITP
BILL TO: City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain St.
Cherryville, NC 28021
ATTN: Mr. Ralph Childers, Jr.
REPORT DATE_
EMS SAMPLE #
P.O. #
WASTEWATER
SLUDGE
OIL
LEACHATE
OTHER
3/30/87
2459
DATE RECEIVED
3/24/87
REPORT
NUMBER
SAMPLE TYPE _GRAB COMPOSiTE
DATE SAMPLED 3/23/87
COLLECTED BY B Shull
REMARKS No. 2610
Sludge Lagoon Underdrain
Do not pay from
this copy
PARAMETER RESULTS DATE ANALYZED ANALYST METHOD OF ANALYSIS CHARGE
Total Dissolved Solids
528.
3/25
DF
160.1
Chloride, Cl
102.
3/24
DM
325.3
Nitrate-Nitrogen,NO3-N
ND @ <0.10
3/27
DF
353.3
Nitrite-Nitrogen,N)2-N
0.13
3/26
MR
354.1
Cadmium, Cd
0.008
3/27
DF
213.1
Lead, Pb
ND @ <0.05
3/27
DF
239.1
Iron, Fe
0.05
3/27
DF
236.1
All
results reported in mg/l
unless otherwise noted.
ND -
Analyte not detected at
detection limit indicated.
$95.40
REPORT COPY

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Dear Ms. Hovis:
Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 7, 1987
Subject: Permit No. NCO044440
Sludge Storage Lagoon
Gaston County, N. C.
A review of the March 24, 1987 monitoring results shows all parameters
in compliance. At this time the Groundwater Section of the Division of
Environmental Management will not require monitoring wells for the lagoon.
If the monitoring parameters continue to fluctuate in and out of compliance
monitor wells will be required.
Enclosed are Compliance Monitoring Report Forms for future submission
of monitoring results.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, and if you have any
questions, please contact this Office.
EJK:pb
Sincerely,
Eric J. Klingel
Regional Hydrogeologic Supervisor
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

';9'zez-)
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Ms. Janice Hovs, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Dear Ms. Hovis:
Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 3, 1987
At this time the Mooresville Regional Office Groundwater Staff still
expresses concern that possible groundwater contamination may be occurring
due to the waste disposal operation. Our request for monitoring wells on
January 27, 1987 will be withheld until the quarterly analysis report of the
under drainage system of the sludge storage lagoon is received and evaluated.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not
hesitate to contact this Office at [phone].
EJK:se
Sincerely,
411L
Eric J. Klingel
Hydrogeologic Supervisor
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

• HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.c.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS
LL
February 17, 19�817 t; " I'
",M)kUJIILE
Mr. .Eric Klingel
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115-0950
Subject: Permit No. NC0044440
Sludge Storage Lagoon
Cherryville, North Carolina
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Klingel:
As -we discussed on February 11, 1987, the City is asking you to reconsider the
need to install the two monitoring wells as you designated in your letter of
January 27, 1987. As I explained to you, Gaston Industries, one of the major
water and sewer users in town, has closed and has placed a financial hardship
on the city. The city is suspending nearly all capital improvements projects
and ask that you please consider this in your request to install these wells.
In lieu of having to install these wells, we propose to pup all the drainage to
the treatment plant for treatment.
On behalf of the City, we ask that you please consider these circumstances and
let us know if you need additional information.
Very truly yours,
HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C.
&'t'w C/"�
Recil H. Wright, P.E.
RHW/krf
cc: Mrs. Janice Hovis
City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, N.C. 28021
TWO PARKWAY PLAZA, SUITE 170 14828 PARKWAY PLAZA BLVD. / CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28210
704-525-6051
CHARLOTTE • RALEIGH • HOLLYWOOD, FL • NEW YORK, NY

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Albert F. Hilton, Regional Manager
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 27, 1987
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain Street
Cherryville, North Carolina 28021
Subject: Permit No. NC 0044440
Sludge Storage Lagoon
Gaston County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Hovis:
A review of quarterly monitoring reports submitted by the City of Cherryville
for the sludge storage lagoon underdrainage system was made by the Mooresville
Regional Office Groundwater Staff. Based upon quality monitoring data available,
we are concerned that possible groundwater contamination may be occurring due
to the waste disposal operation.
The analyses indicate steadily increasing levels of total dissolved solids,
chloride, nitrate -nitrogen, NO and nitrite nitrogen NO since initial sampling
done December 12, 1985 of the underdrainage system. Based upon the analytical
reports,within thirty days, the City of Cherryville must construct and monitor
one upgradient and one downgradient monitoring well near the sludge holding lagoon.
The location and construction details for these wells shall be by approval of the
Moroesville Regional Office.
The construction of any monitoring well requires a well construction permit
be obtained from this Office. I have attached the well construction permit
application form which must be submitted to this Office prior to construction.
The monitor wells shall be sampled initially after construction and thereafter
quarterly for the following parameters:
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950, Mooresville, N.C. 28115-0950 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

- ---V fol,
® SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4.
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person
delivered to a7nd the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services are available. Consult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional service(s) requested.
1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. Cr*bstricted Delivery.
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
Ms. Janice Hovis, City Manager P"525 386 893
City of Cherryville Type of Service:
116 South Mountain St. ❑ Registered ❑ Insured
Cherryville, N. C. 28021 ® Certified ❑ coo
Express Mail
Always obtain signature of addressee or
agent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Signature — AddressA i 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if
,.I If ;) - ., .. i requested and fee paid)
PS Form 3811, Feb. 1986 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT

Ms. Janice Hovis
Page Two
January 27, 1987
1. Total Dissolved Solids
2. Chloride
3. Nitrate Nitrogen
4. Nitrite Nitrogen
5. Cadmium
6. Lead
7. Iron
8. Water Level
The measurement of water level shall be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or
Mr. Eric Klingel at [phone].
Sincerly,
Ronald L. McMillan
Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Bob Cheek
7M Rex Gleason
ooresville Regional Office
EJK:se

City of Chenyuille
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROU NA 28021
January 20, 1987
Mr. Rex Gleason
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of our sludge
storage lagoon underdrainage system, performed in December 1986 by EMS
Laboratories. If you have any questions please call me.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Waste Treatment Plant
RCJ: tr
NA
A4
r"Ir. b - Alva)
2nVZzo.,
Pa

EMS Laboratories, Inc.
4132 POMPANO DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
NC Cert #98
SAMPLE SOURCES
Cherryville WWTP
BILL TO: City of Cherryville
116 So. Mountain St.
Cherryville, N. C. 28021
ATTN: Mr. Ralph Childers, Jr.
PARAMETER
TDS
Chloride, Cl
Nitrate -Nitrogen
Nitrite -Nitrogen
Cadmium, Cd
Lead, Pb
Iron, Fe
RESULTS
REPORT DATE 1L/1//86 DATE RECEIVED
EMS SAMPLE # 1867
l2/UU/86
P.O. #
SAMPLE TYPE _GRAB
_COMPOSITE
WASTEWATER X
DATE SAMPLED
12/08/86
8:00am
SLUDGE
COLLECTED BY
REPORT
NUMBER
OIL REMARKS Sludge Lagoon
No.1952
LEACHATE Underdrain
Do not pay from
OTHER this copy
DATE ANALYZED ANALYST METHOD OF ANALYSIS CHARGE
967. 12/9
100. 12/9
9.75 12/10
1.45 12/11
<0.01 12/16
<0.05 12/16
0.03 12/16
All results reported in mg/l unless otherwise noted.
MR
DM
DM
DM
DF
DF
DF
160.1
325.3
353.3
354.1
213.1
239.1
236.1
195.40
DATA REVIEWED BY: -11, d U
`' REPORT COPY

City of Chmyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
July 8, 1986
®n1SfpN OF ENVIRONfyENrA! ZZ)
VANAGEyaV
JUt 10 1986
r
Mr. Rex Gleason
N.C. Department'of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
Please be advised that the City of Cherryville was unable to perform the
Quarterly Analysis of the Under Drainage System on our Sludge Storage Lagoon,
wich was due in June. We were unable to monitor because there was no drainage
coming from the system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr., Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatment Plant
RC:tr

GNEBR
r
Mr. Rex Gleason
N.C. Department of Natural Resources &
Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
City of Chenyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021 _
April 18, 1986
K V. DEP . O �'"TTTT;AL
RESOURCES P
.00MMuNrrx BEVtLU,-:,=�.a�
APR
LM IF HVIRG R IENTAL t'!- 1
118alf yli f "REG10-11 L bt.ha ,.
Please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report of the under drainage
system on our sludge storage lagoon, performed in March by EMS laboratories.
If you have any questions concerning this. matter, please contact me
at [phone].
Yours truly,
4�0L�jl
Ralph Childers, Jr.
Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatment Plant
Enclosure: 1
RC :,tr

EMS Laboratories, Inc.
REPORT DATE 3/25/86
DATE RECEIVED
3/21/86
4132 POMPANO DRIVE
799
REPORT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28216
EMS SAMPLE #
[phone]
NUMBER
P.O. #
SAMPLE TYPE --!-GRAB
_COMPOSITE
SAMPLE SOURCES
WASTEWATER X
DATE SAMPLED
3/20/86 9:45AM
Cherryville WWTP-
SLUDGE
COLLECTED BY
Sludge Lagoon Underdrain
NC Certification 98
BILL TO:
OIL
REMARKS
No. 0 0 6 6 9
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain St
LEACHATE
Do not pay from
Cherryville, N.C. 28021
Att: Mr: Ralph Childers, Jr
OTHER
this Copy
PARAMETER
RESULTS
DATE ANALYZED
ANALYST METHOD OF ANALYSIS
CHARGE
Total Dissolved Solids
500
3/24/86
DM
160.1
Chloride, Cl
91
3/21/86
DM
325.3
Nitrate -Nitrogen, NO3-N
1.2
3/24/86
DF
353.3
Nitrite -Nitrogen, NO2-N
0.03
3/24/86
DF
354.1
Cadmium, Cd
6 0.01
3/21/86
DF
213.1
Lead, Pb
< 0.05
3/21/86
DF
-239.1
Iron, Fe
0.16
3/24/86
DF
236.1
All results in mg/L
Total
$95.40
REVIEWED BY: Adler"VL,1"'K &/ -t y,' , REPORT COPY

Nw-
Mr. Rex Gleason
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources & Community Development
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, North Cat oiina 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason:
City of Chenyville
116 South Mountain Street
NORTH CAROLINA 28021
January 14, 1986
..,i..T�T`e,r�TY
_D�p�,LOPf�J�'
Al OFFICE
In reference to the sludge storage lagoon that the City of Cherryville
recently constructed, and the required monitoring program of its underdrainage
system, please find enclosed the quarterly analysis report performed in
December by EMS Laboratories. If you have any questions, please call me at
435-4181 ext. 42.
Yours truly,
Ralph Childers, Jr. 1 , r..-0 --- - --- — - - -
Superintendent
Water & Wastewater Treatrr, e''G�t% r
Enclosure : -e'o�-
V c.e
i
RC:tr

EMS Laboratories, Inc.
4132 POMPANO DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28216
[phone]
SAMPLE SOURCES
Underdrainage from drying beds
BILL TO:
City of Cherryville
116 S. Mountain St.
Cherryville, N.C. 28021
REPORT DATE 12/23/85
EMS SAMPLE # 494
vn s
WASTEWATER
SLUDGE
OIL
LEACHATE X
OTHER
DATE RECEIVED 12/16/85
SAMPLE TYPE --!-GRAB _COMPOSITE
DATE SAMPLED 12/12/85
COLLECTED BY
REMARKS NC Certification 98
PARAMETER
RESULTS
DATE ANALYZED
ANALYST
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Total dissolved solids
364.
12/19/85
DF
160.1
Chloride, C1
56-
12/17/85
DF
325.3
Nitrate -Nitrogen, NO3
2.75
12/17/85
DF
353.3
Nitrite -Nitrogen, NO2
0.01
12/17/85
DF
354.1
Cadmium, Cd
<0.01
12/20/85
DF
213.1
Lead, Pb
<0.01
12/20/85
DF
239.1
Iron, Fe
0.03
12/20/85
DF
236.1
All results in mg/L
1ATA REVIEWED BY:
Total
nYt'• 2� 10
NEpO
Ot��' �1GER
F\NPNOE OF
REPORT COPY
REPORT
NUMBER
No.0 0 431
Do not pay from
this copy
CHARGE
$95.40

PTATURAL W g
�ii`SIO(g,Q&NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
August 1, 1984
15IDa .�.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Mills
THRU: Arthur Mouberry
FROM: Lee Laymon
SUBJECT: City of Cherryville, Sludge Holding Lagoon
. The Groundwater Section recommends that the subject facility be
permitted as proposed and that the discharge from the underdrains be
monitored quarterly for the following parameters:
(1) Total Dissolved Solids
(2) Chloride
(3) Nitrate Nitrogen
(4) Nitrite Nitrogen,,
(5) Cadmium
(6) Lead
(7) Iron
LLL/ls
c c : QT1 MER, R0KMET, R-
Permit Files
df�

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 24, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: Dale Crisp
FROM: D. Rex Gleason
PREPARED BY: Larry D. Coble 'f�
SUBJECT: Sludge Storage Lagoon
City of Cherryville
Gaston County
On January 5, 1984 this Office received a copy of a letter to Ms. Janice
Hovis, City Manager of Cherryville, from you. The letter concerned the
construction of the subject sludge storage lagoon..
On January 20, 1984, this Office conducted a site investigation and
prepared a Staff Report and Recommendations, which was sent to you. The Staff
Report was based on a set of plans received from the City's Engineer.
Later on it was learned that these plans and specifications had been
revised. Upon receipt of the revised plans, it was noted that the lagoon
had an underdrain system. The underdrain was for collection and discharge of
groundwater.
Based on information available, we have some questions about the ability
of the proposed lagoon to protect water quality in the area. The discharge
pipe shows an outlet elevation of 796. This level appears to be at or near the
level of the stream on the site. It also appears that any leakage through the
lagoon bottom would flow into the underdrain system and be discharged:
It is our opinion that by raising the total bottom of the lagoon the
groundwater would not be a problem and the underdrain system could be eliminated.
Some assurance that water quality problems will not occur is necessary
prior to this Office recommending approval of the project.
If 3/ou have any questions or require further information, please advise.
cc: t Hagstrom
0 Groundwater Section /

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 18, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: Arthur Mouberry
FROM: Dick Peace
SUBJECT: Permit Application 00-3187
City of Cherryville - Sludge Storage Lagoon
After reviewing the revised blueprint drawing on the subject matter, I
raise a question that both the Water Quality and Groundwater Mooresville Regional
Office staff thinks should be answered. The question concerns the solid PVC pipe
that extends from the drainage system beneath the lagoon to outside the diked
area to a surface elevation of 796 feet above msl.
On the property of the wastewater treatment facility, exactly where is the
796 elevation discharge point? We need to ask the City to have a surveyor determine
this point.
There is an 11 foot drop from the outside base of the dike (elevation
approximately 807) to the discharge point (elevation 796). On a 72 minute
topographic map (10 foot contours), the 800 foot contour is the highest shown
above the creek. The Mooresville Office thinks there is a possibility that the
discharge point may be in the creek bank or at least in the flood plain. On the
blueprint drawing, the PVC solid line is shown extending into the woods that are
growing beside the creek. Mr. Childers, operator at Cherryville WWTP, estimates
the distance from the edge of the woods to the creek to be no more than 50 feet.
In January, 1984 the water table at the northern corner of the lagoon was at
elevation 797, one (1) foot above the proposed elevation at the discharge point.
The discharge point may be lower than the top of the water table.
Mr. Childers is sending me an E.P. toxicity report on the sludge. After we
receive that report I will recommend water quality testing parameters and
frequencies.
RRP:sju
cc: Art Hagstrom
MRO W.Q. File