20100873 Ver 1_Application_20101019

i
OF W ATF9 V
y
® v°F"R 1p10
0S?0?cW ?km.
®®873
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Constructio &ation C Form
A. Applicant Information
1; Processing
Ia. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number. RGP 31
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ®No
1.]. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
te. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? TF e recordonly for DWQ 401
cation: -
Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1'F. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ®No
tg.
I Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
11i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2) Project Information
23. Name of project: Jones 34 Bridge To Pipe Replacement NC 41 Over Musselshell Creek
WBS Element Number 2B.105211
21). County: Jones
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cove City
2ii. Subdivision name: N/A
2i:.
i NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 28.105211
3: Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
31). Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3( . Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

i
a I Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4,I1. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4k). Name: Jay B. Johnson
46. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4E:. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
41. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4d. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
4(1. Email address: [e-mail]
& Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5.'1. Name: N/A
5E). Business name
(if applicable):
5c:. Street address:
5c1 1. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
Email address:
I
i
i

Page 2 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B I I Project Information and Prior Project History
1.1 Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Jones 34 NC 41, Over Musselshell Creek

J Latitude: N 35.129608 Longitude: - W
. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 77.334646
1 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2Ei. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Musselshell Creek, a Tributary of Trent River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;Sw;NSW
26. River basin: Neuse Lower Neuse 03020204
3., Project Description
3ei. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
NC 41 is a paved primary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Pipe Replacement.
3c.. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Pipe Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e:. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 31' Long Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 11T' x 79" x 36' SPPA. Excavators,Dump
Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Pipe Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4e). Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the

/
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property

® Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b- If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
I Apri1,2010
5.1 Project History
59. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5i. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.1 Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
66. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version . , ,
C.1 , Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands . ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2.1 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a'. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W11 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: No 404 Wetland Impacts
3.1 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ-non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 SPOT Pipe Musselshell Creek ® PER
? INT ? Corps
® DWQ 10' 40'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
I ? INT ? DWQ
S31 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER El Corps
I ? INT ? DWQ
S5 El P ? T El PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
6 ? PER ? Corps
S
1 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
3h it Total stream and tributary impacts 40 LF
3i.1 Comments: 40 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. I Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a! I 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
pen water Name of waterbody
O
impact number'- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
61 ?P?T
62 ?P?T
63 ?P?T
64 ?P?T
4LITotal open water impacts None
4g? Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a! 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond 10 Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
iP1
IP2
5VTotal None
5g1. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i.' Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j., Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k! Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forth.
6a

PreIlject is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
? Catawba ? Randleman
6b! 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact r uired?
B1 ®P ? T Fill Musselshell Creek ®Nos 610 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Musselshell Creek ? Yes
® No 700Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.
B3 ® P [1 T Fill Musselshell Creek ®Nos 1090 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.

6h. Total buffer impacts
i
6i.'Comments: See Page5A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
41, Open Water Impacts
IfI there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 1 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
ITem ora
101'0 P?T
102 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
104 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If, and or take construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Welland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5 r. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i.. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6? Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6. ® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number-
I Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora impact required?
I B1 ®P ? T
I B4 Fill Musselshell Creek ? Yes
® No 915 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft.
1B2 ? PEI T ? Yes
No
?P?T
I ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 3315 Sq. Ft. OSq. Ft.
61 . Comments:
A
Page
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la! Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are No Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent
feasible, with no impacts occurring on the project
lb! Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through constriction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2.1 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a! Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ?DWQ ? Corps

2c, If yes; which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a: Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b! Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a! Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b, Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c, If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d; Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e? Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g; Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h; Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a j If using a pennittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. 1 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b.1 If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zorie 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g.! If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
perrnittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h! Comments:
i
E. i Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. I Diffuse Flow Plan
I a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will ® Yes ? No
not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated
uplands before entering into the
buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? WA Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b.' Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c.,i If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.1 If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated uplands
before entering into the
buffers.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stor mwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed

I ? Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Proram Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
® Other: NPDES Permit
4b.1 Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
i
S.
DWQ 401 Unit Stomrwater Review
I
I
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a. IDoes the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
i
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/stateAocal) funds or the ® Yes ? No
,use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. ! If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
tc. If you answered 'yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
(l
tter
)
? Yes ? No
.
e
Comments:
2. (Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. i Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.! Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. !Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.,Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S. (Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

5a. 1
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected sped as or
? yes No
(
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
I ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
'Habitat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC, July 14, 2009
6. iEssential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. !What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. ( Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. [What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
l NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Pipe designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Oct
ober
Betty Ann Caldwell, PE Q: G 2010
plicant(Agents Printed Name A plicanUAgents Signature
(Agents signature is valid only it an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
Flo-08-0011
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: County: Jones
WBS No: 2B.105211 Document:
F.A. No: Funding: ® State ? Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type: NWP 3 or NWP 14
Project Description:
Replace Bridge No. 34 on NC 41 over Musselshell Creek.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on August 26, 2010. Based on this review, there were no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects Jones County GIS mapping (2008) including aerial
photography and tax information revealed no structures more than 50 years old exists within the APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
The Jones County Historic Architecture Survey was conducted in 1997. No historic structures were
identified near the APE of this project. The Jones County Tax Parcel Data is considered valid for the
purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached:
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
D
"No Survey Required"form for Minor Tmmponmion Projecu a, Quatffied in the 2007 Pn gmmmmic Agreement.
NCDOTArrhaentogv & Huronc Anchireaure Group,

'?!(f ???
..pit. Y.i'i hi._'?

i

1,----- \ ? B/r

_

_

? 145 _1232
1236 J.

Cam' 1 - '.'??

1aS
tyl-
- BM it 9
° 0 em
1233

I?1

1 V ??Y 123T

Water
lank

\?
? (J
as
x]55

? 1 `-
Cem.

c --
145 aml1ll
15-

? -r r5o
1 _
`l .

115
l l 6
_
? ??
.\ 11
: ..
C
1r \ 15.0
165 '

7 1.
a lI I
I
I

6 R ..E F1 T D O <V E R g q p

15.5
SS

`
\
" 15 \\
\1
^

?e4
41
\
1
I \
\\

1A5N1YlN It KM 20' >88
:89 fMEN?ON) w 91 17'30'
L'0 r)I-14.7,1
To
JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
ct COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET .
NUMBER 2,INSET OF THE SOIL SURVEYOFJOAES. COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4580 J PROPOSED 24W "x 6! 6"
MAPNUMBER3720458000J ALUMINUMBOX CULVERT
s WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.105211 LOWER NEUSE 03020204
• :MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW .. AUGUST. 23, 2010
s
W E
S To
•
Ra
_ To
Ct
•
Ct
Pn
Sx
Sx
Ct
Ct
To I JONES 34
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
Pn Y= 506274.6598
' X= 2497902.1718
N35^-07'-471.' a
W 77^40'-05"
R N 35129608 DEGREES
Pn Mk .7.7.3346.46 DEGREES
a,Q
a
?y
1 inch= 2,000 feet ?a
2,600 1,300 0 2,600 Feet GoA 0.y
JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK -
COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 2JNSET OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4580 J PROPOSED 24'-1 "x 6'-6"
MAP NUMBER 3 72 0458 000J ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT _ .,.
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B. 105211 LOWER NEUSE 03020204
MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW AUGUST 23, 2010
W E
S
I

JONES 34
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
n ,
Y= 506274.6598
X=2497902.1718
G R E ' N35^-07'-47"
W 77^-20'-05"
'% <l N 35.129608 DEGREES
•a- -? 334646 DEGREES
W 77
.

1 inch = 2,000 feet
2,600 1,300 0 2,600 Feet
a C
Rq
`F
N

VY
C
O
lase
O
\ IV
wig
\
l
I B
8

P O
O0YFl1
it \
s ? `• l
4
taoz 4. ` 4J
j; Polobl 1 / no \
a i \
SWAMP
1]4A i • \
1319
7?
\ tate?b J 13 " tooz ry/ ter
i

1

,
t
i
P1
Ten A
i
i
?' L

Project Tracking Na. (internal Use)
10-08-0011
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No:
F.A. No:
I
JONES 34
County: Jones
213.105211
n/a
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
Funding: ® State ? Federal
® Yes ? No Permit Type: Nationwide
Project Description:Replace existing 31' long by 25.5' wide timber bridge with a proposed 14'-1 "x 6'4"
I aluminum box culvert on NC41 over Musselshell Creek The project length and archaeological APE is
200f. from each end of the existing bridge within the existing 60f. wide right-of-way.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology on Tuesday, August
31, 2010. No previously recorded archaeological sites are situated within the currently defined APE,
project study area, or general vicinity (5 mile radius). A review of NRUP listed archaeological
properties/districts within Jones County was completed which identified no such resources within or
adjacent to the presently defined APE. Furthermore, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website),
USDA soil survey maps (Sx), aerial photographs, and the Google street view map application were
utilized/inspected to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric
settlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modem, slope, agricultural, hydrological,
and other erosive-type disturbances within and surrounding the archaeological APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Due largely to the diminutive scope of the proposed project and relatively minute construction footprint
subsuming only the existing right-of-way, significant archaeological or cultural resources are unlikely to
be affected by the project. Soil survey maps have mapped Stockade fine sandy loam within the presently
defined APE, a very poorly drained soil in shallow drainageways of the county, and aerial photographs
illustrate that the project area is largely characterized by disturbance from cultivation/agriculture. -
Furthermore, the presence of copious drainage ditches surrounding the general project area demonstrate
that much of this land was drained, reclaimed swampland. No further archaeological work is
recommended for this rural, state-funded construction project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ® Photos ?Correspondence
? Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
"No Survey Requited"form for Mirror Trvnsponation Praicas m Qualified in the 300] Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOTArchaealogy a Historic Architecture Groups
"No Survey Required"fonn for Minor Tia+porfadea Projnn m Quaked M the 1007 Progrvmmmic Agreement.
i NCDOTArdm ology & Halam Archiieclue Groups
i
JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 2,INSET OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
EXISTING 31'L ONG BY 25.5' WIDE
(24.1' CLEAR ROADWAY) RC FLOOR ON TIMBER PILES
PROPOSED 2@ 117"x 79"x 36' SPPA WITH HEADWALLS
MAP NUMBER 3720458000) FIRM PANEL 4580 J
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.105211 LOWER NEUSE 03010204
MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW AUGUST 23, 2010
0034
W E
S
1 inch = 2,000 feet
2,600 1,300
2,600 Feet
0
JONES 34
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
Y= 506274.6598
X=2497902.1718
N35^-07'-47"
W77 20'-05"
N35.129608 DEGREES
W 77.334646 DEGREES
?. I JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
T NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 2JNSET OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
EXISTING 31' LONG BY 15.5' WIDE
(24. P CLEAR ROADWAY) RC FLOOR ON TIMBER PILES
l PROPOSED 2 @ 117" x 79"x 36' SPPA WITH HEADWALLS
MAP NUMBER 3 72 0458 000J FIRM PANEL 4580 J
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.105211 LOWER NEUSE 03020204
i MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW AUGUST 23, 2010
r
' f66 I I ISO
I
U r... I '\
^ 2 i
G R E A T DI..,.. E R
p
IS
_ I 10034
''i°ss I
i
41 i!
s _ JONES 34
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
Y= 506274.6598
X=1497902.1718
N35^-07'47"
F.. " j s G R E W 77^-10' O5„
N35.129608 DEGREES
/j?SoaR -? W 77.334646 DEGREES
yG ??zo
-h 1 inch = 2,000 feet
2,600 1,300 0 2,600 Feet ' ,r ? @ ?
JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 2,INSET OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
EXISTING 31' LONG BY25.5' WIDE
(24.1' CLEAR ROADWAI) RC FLOOR ON TIMBER PILES
PROPOSED 2 @ 117"x 79"x 36'SPPA WITHHEADWALLS
MAP NUMBER 3720458000J FIRM PANEL 4580 J
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.105211 LOWER NEUSE 03020204
MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW AUGUST 23, 2010
Ra
°
Ra
Act
ct
Pn
ct
W • • E °V^ Sx
S JONES 34
NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
Pn Y= 506274.6598
° X=2497902.1718
N35^-07'-47"
W77 A_20'-05"
R N35.129608 DEGREES
Pn Mk "'9sr a W 77.334646 DEGREES
R ?
o ?
t.y
1 inch = 2,000 feet ga
2,600 1,300 0 2,600 Feet GOA ?Y
JONES 34 BRIDGE TO BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT
0 390NC 41 OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK
COVE CITY USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET
NUMBER 2,INSET OF THE SOIL SURVEYOF JONES COUNTY
EXISTING 3FLONG BY25.5' WIDE(24X CLEAR ROADWAY)
• RC FLOOR ON TIMBER PILES
PROPOSED 2 @ 117" x 79" x 36' SPPA WITH HEADWALLS
530 MAP NUMBER 3 72 0458 000J FIRM PANEL 4580 J
S3oo WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.105211 LOWER NEUSE 03010204
MUSSELSHELL CREEK C;Sw;NSW AUGUST 13, 2010
i 530092
• 2? 5 `or- 3 1 `
J -• Z4VZl
530158530159 4 c°y 240
O • o ? S n
53001 7 24 5 a? n'e?
a _ DETOUR ROUTE am 4
530073 ° a D
•
5300660
05
+
y.

•530023
2400 0 over 0
00 1 129
30162.301 2- 0 ,)0 $1005 4013 0'S3. Ra A
e"005 A
0 510089 hoc ,??.
240
530021 DETOUR ROUTE s 70
F N ,
o ?a ao
o 67 _
Pine

51
m
aO JONES 34
N qgN35 NC 41 OVER MUSSE LSHELL CREEK
Y= 506274.6598
E X= 2497902.1718
^-07'-47"
W 77^-20'-05"
N 35.119608 DEGREES
W 77.334646 DEGREES
Bg ' S1c
1 inch = 20,833 feet
s
27,500 13,750 0 27,500 Feet 51 e
1 0a l .
From: Sutton, Michael w Jones County Bridges Part 1 of 2.txt
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 5:28 PM
To: Travis Wilson ([e-mail])
cc: Jay.B. Johnson ([e-mail])
subject: Jones County Bridges Part 1 of 2
Attachments: Jones34vicinity.PDF; Jones34Quad.PDF; Joness1vicinity.POF;
Jones5lQuad.POF
Hey Travis.... Division 2 is would like to replace these existing bridges in Jones
county with pipes. Are these Anadromous Fish Locations, and if so, what would the
moratorium be? Many Thanks... mike
i
Jones County Bridges Moratorium txt
From: wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Tuesday: July 14, 2009 9:19 AM
To: Sutton, Michael w
subject: Jones County Bridges,
Mike i apologize for the long delay, but i just haven't been around much in the last
several weeks.
For the Jones County Bridges: Bridge #73 over Reedy Branch will have a recommended
moratorium of Feb 15 to June 15. Bridge #'s 51,65,31 do not have moratoriums.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1
Replacements\Jones 34\Jones 34
m^ ^
rNZ?9Q mzm Q
oN??o °° .o?. m
am??V :aTN?s90
b, {,NemW ???Nm2
m N •
tD
n^z?mg mm A'- m
rNN ati r z mg
< ONOA mNN'9'?
•mmsmA •'°x?mA C
N:e°?90 p?m?ON?
m jj4 y OSa?Z
a?NN• T
m
m r'N
R?aR y=
oaj?'w N?
mg?°
0V
?O
nN
o?
•-o
R
a a
N rS
A g p
ro
b k
b A `i
?f N
N N
O U
€
C
I fIm
0
SN
IO
I.°

N
0
0
a
9

yyy

i II q R
& ,c y F
2 FF F II

®1 o®
®®®o?
a
g
.I
? II
? II
II
II
I I
II
I I Im
I?
fI N l
o II ps
pt?i? o I' I I I I)
r ?R €11 o i I I I I I
N?o ? I? II I
b?? ? ?, ?I II III
o?o ? III II II I I
I

L
w
? p
FA?f
Ai
A lti ??QbAyyy [S?[S??pp
?I=ilmO
y
y
i ?
mN .

l'
s !a
II ng
I I