450002_Inspection_20201112

Division of Water Resour
Facility Number (,(� - ;3 D,)— 0 Division of Soil and Water honservation
0 Other Agency
Date of Visit: I I 2 Arrival Time: a1OG. Departure Time: County: Re/ 6hatayJ Regfi m
ftc
Farm Name: ,p j (I )y}-r yl,ra Owner Email: B1 IIO kb,) S7bA%(:�) �tu
Owner Name: �1, /:, _� '[mil— n( a, yz, Lj—C. Phone: 0+2—l�—"7ol'%-7"9
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: R111u C,,In_Title:
(} r 1
Oneite Representative: q"4711q J'(,r. �.f'II�
Certified Operator: VV 1 l l r yl-M -V-- c, V6 T7VIJ
Back-up Operator: _
6"
Location of Farm: Ik,
Swine
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: / bj .7 13 I
�p Certification Number:
Latitude: o�'3tb % It t Longitude: �Cyle�'7 t 56 !r
3
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pallets
I urke s
MTurke Poults
oche,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 5Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[—]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

Facility Number. L - Date of Inspection: ij 11
`�"'�
yt}
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
54 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Structure 5
Structure 6
Spillway?:�
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
WNe
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yea
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pouring ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zu, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): / 6)</}rdH..0 �`Y9STG.,/rr.! tt—&-tat "
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ON-
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
VLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
17j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
��Z[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
'�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
RQNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
p� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall
Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
'� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rambreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of
21412015 Continuer!

Facility Number: k)CA jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [4 No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes R No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
0.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[,2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:)Yes
[Z.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes [allo
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
(� •V-e*ka1 o j Jt S�1¢e l ior�
W3r� l wt3l-d
v m- pLve .
�z vrsDS hvec��) e-ci t VnV�u�
wev�
cave? Stnvto-g i r���l o� iwS �D,J
W(L t,
.s4bwr,Ci- A -At " t
sI*-"Ie -
w�'1 — GlnSua� �r�ze-SS.
P o,,A
YM
on)c� cam,1,-4, 1'tc
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t�� tt,. ��'�q6 l�ty`I
A Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: II / 2-
Page 3 of 2/4/20I5