20201491 Ver 1_Shannon Woods_PCN_20201210

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions WEPG
and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2019-01016 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Shannon Woods
2. Work Type: Private 7 Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
PCN request for a Residential Development
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
Government ❑ Commercial ❑
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Lennar (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC / WEPG
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
35.5714,-81.0545, Denver NC
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: Please refer to attached parcel Map
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Catawba
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:Denver
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Reed Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 W1 Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
R
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
November 9, 2020
Ms. Krystynka Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301, Moorseville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: SAW-2019-01016 Application for NWP # 29 for the Shannon Woods site, Denver,
Catawba County, NC.
Mses. Stygar, and Messrs. Johnson, Wojoski and Hamstead
Enclosed is a Pre -Construction Notification for Nationwide Permits # 29 for the approximate 380
-acre site known as the Shannon Woods site located near — 5776 Woebegone Trail, Denver, NC
2650. The current project area is a proposed residential development and consists of thirteen
streams and thirteen wetlands. The site has been field verified by the USACE (Catherine
Janiczak) on 7/10/2019. Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination and Approvals sections
of the PCN packet for updated information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to two
wetlands and three streams for fill associated with three road crossings in addition to minor
temporary impacts for the installation of a sanitary sewer where directional boring was not
feasible. Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. ri [e-mail]
www.wetiands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
limited through site selection location, design, location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes and a large portion of the site will remain undisturbed tree save with wide buffers
along streams and significant wetland features. Due to the location of the features in relation to
existing roads and municipal infrastructure, opportunities to completely avoid these features
were limited. The total permanent wetland impacts proposed include 0.018 ac of wetland
(Wetlands XX & PP). The total permanent stream impacts proposed include 5261f of stream
channel (Streams A, M & J).
Efforts of impact minimization were implemented during the design to preserve the existing
channel hydrology and limit adverse effects to existing, onsite natural habitat. Impacts associated
with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and
location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes. The overall site plan has undergone
several significant revisions through negotiations with the County that have resulted in the
reduction of an additional crossing that would have otherwise been required. All of the proposed
stream impacts are for required crossings only and the site layout was carefully considered and
designed to avoid a large, high quality wetland complex in the center of the site. The proposed
roadways will be maintained by NCDOT and the crossings have been designed to meet NCDOT
requirements, which do not allow bottomless crossings in this case due to a lack of the required
bedrock. Each of the crossings has been designed to minimize impacts to the extent possible
while meeting the engineering requirements, as detailed in the attached memorandum from the
project engineer. One temporary open cut for a sewerline installation will be restored to pre-
existing conditions per the attached stream stabilization detail. The applicant has demonstrated
substantial avoidance and minimization efforts in which 97% of the 15,548 linear feet of stream
channels and 99 % of the 1.29 ac of wetlands onsite will be avoided on the project.
The applicant requests a waiver for 236 linear feet of impacts to Intermittent stream A. This
feature forms at the base of a deeply incised erosional gulley below a maintained utility corridor
and as such has a highly eroded, altered pattern and profile, a discontinuous bed and bank, and
lacks any consistent ordinary high water mark through the reach proposed for a waiver. Impacts
to this feature are unavoidable due to the constraints imposed by site conditions, steep terrain,
and design requirements. Attempts to obtain an easement along the privately owned access road
to the north of the proposed crossing area were unsuccessful. The crossing could not be shifted
south due to sight distance, radius of curvature, and safety requirements as detailed in the letter
of memorandum provided by the project engineer in the Waiver Study section. The attached
NCSAM indicates that the study reach is of relatively low functional quality with limited aquatic
habitat opportunity. Please see the enclosed assessment form for matrix scores and overall
functional ratings derived from the NCSAM. Additional forms and photographs of these features
are provided in the Waiver Request Study section of the permit application.
To compensate for the anticipated permanent impacts, the applicant is proposing payment to the
NCDMS at a 0.5: 1 ratio for 236 if of low -quality intermittent stream impacts and a 2:1 ratio for
290 linear feet of perennial warm water stream impacts. Please refer to the enclosed conditional
acceptance letter from NCDMS.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 2
len. ri [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Daniel Kuefler
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

a`'pF wArE�Q�
fl qqlt:� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Shannon Woods
2b.
County:
Catawba
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Denver
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Donna Helderman
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
please see attached parcel map
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
5776 Woebegone Trail
3e.
City, state, zip:
Maiden, INC, 28650
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-451-4588
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Christian Jones
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Lennar Carolinas
4d.
Street address:
6701 Carmel Road, Ste. 425
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28226
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Daniel Kuefler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-554-2728
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
please see attached parcel map
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.5714 Longitude:-81.0545
1 c.
Property size:
380 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reed Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c.
River basin:
03050101
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is located east of Highway 16, north of Highway 150 along Reed Creek, northwest of Denver, in Catawba county, North Carolina. The site
consists of broad ridges with mixed hardwood — pine forest types and forested slopes leading to alluvial forest along Reed Creek and its tributaries.
Upland areas along the broad ridges and upper slopes are disturbed with a dense understory.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.29
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 15,548
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of road crossings, BMPs, fill & sewerline installation for a residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
This site was verified by C. Janiczak (USAGE) on 2/25/20. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Approvals section.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.01
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.008
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.018
2h. Comments:
W1-Wetland XX
W2- Wetland P
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
PLEASE
S3
Choose one
SEE
S4
Choose one
ATTACHED
S5
Choose one
TABLE
S6
Choose one
BELOW
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Shannon Woods — Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Table 3. Summary of Stream Impacts
Stream Impact
Perennial (PER)
Average
Impact
number Permanent
Type of Impact
Stream Name
or Intermittent
Type of
Stream Width
Length (linear
(P) or Temporary (T)
(INT)
Jurisdiction
(feet)
feet)
S1 - P
Culvert
Stream J
PER
Corps
5
120
Construction
S2 - T
Stream J
PER
Corps
5
40
Access
S3 - P
Culvert
Stream M
PER
Corps
5
135
Construction
S4-T
Stream
PER
Corps
5
40
Access
S4 - P
Culvert
Stream A
INT
Corps
3
236
S5 - T
Excavation
Stream A
INT
Corps
3
25
S5 - P
Culvert
Stream M
PER
Corps
5
35
Construction
S6 - T
Stream M
PER
Corps
5
20
Access
Total Impacts
651
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len.rindnerga wetlands-epg.com
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The overall site plan as underwent several significant revisions and negotiations with the County that have resulted in the reduction of
an additional crossing. Roadways need to be built to DOT standards and are subsequently subject to design requirements that limit further
minimization of stream impacts per the attached memorandum from the project engineer.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Where possible, 2:1 slopes and the maximum allowable headwalls will be used to minimize crossing impacts. Directional boring will be implemented
where possible to avoid additional impacts for utility installations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
526 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
A 0.5:1 ratio is proposed for 236 If of impacts to Intermittent Stream A, which is degraded and discontinuous in the vicinity of the proposed crossing -
please refer to the Waiver Study materials for details. A 2:1 ratio is proposed for 290 If of impacts to perennial streams M and J for the other required
crossings.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
60 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to Catawba County
but
will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Catawba County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ® No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional phases are proposed at this time.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened and endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared
bat but the project is except as described in the attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/. Please refer to the Cultural Resources Study included.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
https://gis.catawbacountync.gov/
Daniel Digitally signed by
Daniel Kuefler
Date:
Daniel Kuefler
Kuefler 16:34:34 34-05 -05'0000'
11-05-2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identificationllnapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Naive: Shannon Woods site
Property Address: —5776 Woebegone frail, Maiden, NC 28b50
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): please see atatched parcel map
Select one: I am other
/1l -
Name: ("14R 5-11 AQ
Company: L NNkV_ CAP-01,lQ& S, LC
Mailing Address: (,,,,701 (Ae-m CL -�d., 5 LArrC q25, 0114a- .0rrc i NC_ Z 8 ZzG
Telephone Number: qFv, 619, 79-311
Electpmkc Mail Address: Ch 2 I ST114W , 53-1V c S u1v N ALL'—' • C ail
l Interested Buyer* I Other
Z1. Za?.o
Date
* The Interested Buyerl0ther acknowledges that an agreement andlor formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists hetiveen the current property oivner and the signatmy of this withorization in cases
ivhe►•e the property is not owned by the signatmy.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd.. Bldg, 1
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
len. ri nd ner@wetlands - epg.com

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Christian Jones
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
Project: Shannon Woods
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 29, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/29/2021
County: Catawba
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Catawba
03050101
Warm Stream
551
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Daniel Kuefler, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
o/vrv�.t rr r�r.i.nr� o�w�
North Carolina Department of Etrvironmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.]one s Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1652
919,707.8976

►0
Maps/Plans

Long Island
_
b
Sherrills Ford
Lake Norman
of Catawba
SITE
Denver
❑avid;
-.f
5
Olivers
MOSS rC u dS
The Howl -A -Day
R
r�
0
u
a
k
IA4
a
e
Acres:
+/- 405
FIGURE 1
11128118
Shannon Woods
Catawba County, NC
VICINITY MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
160 RVI
1895 {{,,
C6)
iD
L W.3ii,.
APPROXIMATE
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
3
Prepared for:
Lennar Carolinas LLC
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
DCK LSR
9

r
I y •f
APPROXI 1
PROJECTTE
:A'!Ilt
t.
• STUDY LIMITS
r�
s E 4
eedl
y
I• M
k 4
y
it ry ti •�� A'- �I";'�. ..�r•�
� 5,• � y �ry �{ f s - r
y�
jk ti
t 1
+r
I
4 dj Y�F � •
'rl' •
a f
wr r E ;
ProvidedAerial Imagery .
S ..• •
"
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
len.rindner@wetlands- ep&Com
[phone]
www.wetiands-epg.corn

J
APPROXIMATE
PROJECT BOUNDARY ' 7
•_} r'� STUDY LIMITS
r +
r •. F 1
LPL �i 'TL i - Reed Creek
1 ~
� 1
` 4f,
1 � ■ ti• �I � r r'
■ 5 r J
'I • I F � � ti� I -�
%
r
{II_r.r J
■ ` ` ■ •L I
L ■ , ■ •` ■ ■ L 11
IL
l l- 1
%
+ 1 ~
1
i �r ■
r L �� 1 ■
• � • ti
IP
IV
1-
d' �' � ' �•
1
SCALE LOCATION
1:24,000 Lat: 35.5714 °N
-P F _ USGS QUAD ACRES Long:-81.0545 °W -
_• Denver, NC +405 HUC: 03050101 (Catawba)
. I I .i • '1
Acres: Shannon Woods Prepared for:
+/- 405 Catawba County, NC Lennar Carolinas LLC
FIGURE 3
USGS MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
11/28/18 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification DICK

C'
APPROXIMATE : k
PROJECT BOUNDARY E c � f
r �+ STUDY LIMITS
C*C7
G+r t e COW
ow
■� . � I � �'(? . ern.-t s Pot
cam CV
'+ tME2 • IPVE
- • 1 `� P2
t
„q e' 4 p C"fi? � Cm1W
do
Aqi
cou!!KT
AID
CMC2
%ff �
*COW
r
C r
+�+47 NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
Catawba County 1975
Acres: Shannon Woods Prepared for:
+/- 405 Catawba County, NC Lennar Carolinas LLC
FIGURE 4
SOIL MANUSCRIPT MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
11/28/18 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification DCK LSR .

Soil Map --Catawba County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
WEPG
+/- 405
Catawba County, NC
Lennar Carolinas
LLC
FIGURE 5b
11/28/18
NRCS SOILS MAP - Legend
Subject toUSACE/NCDEQverification
Drawn By:
DCK
Reviewed By:
LSR
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaB
Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6
1187
23.3%
percent slopes
CaC
Cecil sandy loam, fi to 10
174.3
34.3%
percent slopes
Cad
Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15
57_0
11.2%
percent slopes
CeB2
Cecil clay loam, 2 to fi percent
7.7
1.5%
slopes, moderately eroded
CeC2
Cecil clay loam, 6 to 10
28.2
5.5%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
ChA
Chewacla loam, D to 2 percent
15.2
30°!0
slopes, frequently flooded
CoA
Congaree loam, D to 2 percent
32.2
6.3°!0
slopes, frequently flooded
PaE3
Pacolet clay loam, 10 to 25
1.1
D_2°!o
percent slopes, severely
eroded
PeE
Pacolet soils, 10 to 25 percent
63.5
12.5%
slopes
WdE
Wedowee sandy loam, 10 to
108
2.1
25 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
508.8
100.0%

PROJECT BOUNDARY I
STUDY LIMITS
PARCEL:368602782402
SHEILA PUNCH
5717 WOEBEGONE TR,
MAIDEN NC 28650
PARCEL: 368602783188
THOMAS & LINDA SIGMON
5682 WOEBEGONE TR,
MAIDEN NC 28650
PARCEL:368611661830
ANDREW & DOYLE GILLELAND
5834 S NC 16, MAIDEN, NC 28650
PARCEL:368611661830
ANDREW & DOYLE GILLELAND
5834 S NC 16, MAIDEN, NC 28650
Acres:
+/- 190
FIGURE
6 09/15/20
PARCEL:368704800340
DONNA HELDERMAN & DOUGLAS HOWARD
5776 WOEBEGONE TR, MAIDEN NC 28650
PARCEL:368611669952
ANDREW & ROSE GILLELAND
5858 S NC 16,
MAIDEN, NC 28650
PINETUCK
Catawba Co., NC
PARCEL MAP
Subject to USACE Verification
PARCEL:368608997482
EATHEL HOWARD
PARCEL:368612872371
EMMITT HOWARD
5836 E NC HWY 150,
DENVER, NC 28037
PARCEL:368704906578
DONNA HELDERMAN & DOUGLAS HOWARD
4327 HAWKS NEST DR, DENVER, NC 28037
PARCEL:369717001165
EATHEL HOWARD
4340 HAWKS NEST DR,
DENVER NC 28037
PARCEL:369605081071
EATHEL HOWARD
Prepared for:
Land Design
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
ALL
PARCEL:369605090747
BOBBY LUTZ
4414 HAWKS NEST DR,
DENVER NC 28037
PARCEL:369605082126
DOUGLAS & RICHARD HOWARD
6004 E NC H WY 150,
DENVER, NC 28037
N

of=
'Qr
c
�o-
nu
=roc
overt
i
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
(TYP.) �
i
INTERMITTENT
/
STREAM A (±1,492 LF)
a �
S /=U
PERENNIAL STREAM M
(�,135 LF)
(±1.09 AC)
WETLAND BE
\
(14,523 SF)
(±0.104 AC)
\ PROPERTY —
BOUNDARY
\ (TYP.)
PERENNIAL STREAM L /
(±1,044 LF)
(±0.12 AC)
PERENNIAL STREAM J
(2,825 LF) _
(±1.39 AC)
PERENNIAL STREAM K
(±95 LF)
(±0.01 AC)
FLAGGED
LIMITS OF
MILL SITE
WETLAND X
(±46,388 SF)
(±1.065 AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM E
(±407 LF)
INTERMITTENT STREAM W
(±141 LF)
WETLAND H
(262 SF)
(±0.006 AC)
~� WETLAND G
(±191 SF)
(±0.004 AC)
WETLAND 1
(±422 SF)
(±0.010 AC)
WETLAND U
(2,708 SF)
(±0.062 AC)
WETLAND V
(±334 SF)
(±0.008 AC)
WETLAND XX
(25 SF)
50' STREAM
(±0.001 AC)
BUFFER (TYP.)
TRANSITION POINT AT
DOWNSTREAM END OF
WAIVER STUDY REACH
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
(TYP.) j
INTERMITTENT STREAM AA
(25 LF)
I
PROPERTY
_
BOUNDARY
....
(TYP )
WETLAND Z
PERENNIAL STREAM N .— i (±1,163 SF) I
(±5o LF) (±0.027 AC)
(±0.004 AC) , , I WETLAND Y PROPERTY
(±140 SF) BOUNDARY
(±0.003 AC) (TYP.)
LENNAIT
�WK
ioDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
(TYP J
li
INTERMITTENT STREAM Q f
PERENNIALS EAM B WETLAND P ! !
(±110 LF) // (±346 SF)
^�-- (±01.008 AC)
I
WETLAND INTERMITTENT STREAMR L__J
(±156 SF) (±167 LF) I WETLAND S
(±0.004 AC) i i (*-101 SF)
(±0.002 AC)
i
NC HVJ1' 15� \r i
800 0 800 1600
SCALE: 1" = 800'
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([7043345398
(170M13349078
W W W. WKDICKSON.COM
NO
LICENSE NO.F-0 74
m
N �
W Z LU
Q F- ° Z
JO
QOB F
q N ❑
U U Z
OBE W OZ 00
7 BE W Lu
2iO F— F ~
Z O W O U)
BE
Z
BEBEQ
Z Z U =
Q Z U X
U) J W
m
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BV: KWR
DRAWN BV: JJL
PROW. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
1 OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 7

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
CULVERT#1
120
40
CULVERT#2
135
40
CULVERT #3
-WAIVER
236
0
REQUESTED
STREAM A SEWER
CROSSING
0
25
STREAM M CULVERT
EXTENSION
35
20
TOTAL
5261
125
NOTE: \
1. PROJECT MAXIMUM PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS: 60%
50'STREAM
BUFFER(TYP.)
\ !
I +
�x (
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
(TYPJ
PROP. SAN ITARY SEWER
PROPERTY BOUNDARY(TYP.)
_`
��/ /
C EASEMENT(TYP.)
\ r PROP. SANITARY SEWER
T)
TO BE BORED (NO IMPAClit
r r /
11
)rf 1 \ \
PROPOSED INTERMITTENT STREAM
I
I
A AND WETLAND XX IMPACT
SEE SHEET 11 .. _
\ )\I
YI -; �✓�� 41
} \ "'�\
! pROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
/
- - ✓ -
\
_ _
\
_,
�- W STREAM J IMPACT
SEE SHEETS 3 TO 6
V
/ PROPOSED BOX CULVERT J11 ul\ l\ J L t i K " /S %%%%1 jt{(� Sit i t r'-i/// ` PROPERTY
\ \ ih t\ 1 ! 4 / \ t a i y cif \7BMP f .. 1.. _ 1�.�� /J BOUNDARY
/ EXTENSION STREAM M i ))1\ `4C\ 5 J ` ( )) \1 \ I I) I l l I t1 #1�.�i�
} IMPACT SEE SHEET 14 /) 11 \` J, / / 1 \\I„`„ /1/!, 1 ��f!%i C' ( �J ` / (TYPJ
BMP#10UTFALL� 1 \ \ PROP. SANITARY SEWER\ r
1 1\I} 1\Ni lip . " \ _' \} ♦���/ )' l\}If) l S (5 EASEMENT (TYPJ `\" �`�--
`
BMP #3 50' STREAM
BUFFER(TYPJ
50'STREAM
BUFFER (TYPJ [
BMP#3 OUTFALL�
G - = -OUTFALL \\\ PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
PROP. SANITARY SEWER CROSSING - t J _
\ TEMPORARY IMPACT, SEE SHEET 13,^ \l`-\{M N li I \, 1)\mot )`\}� TO BE BORED (NO ACT) R / SEE SHEEnTS 7{TOA OT F
LEGEND: DP
PROPOSED WETLAND P \\ it
IMPACT SEE SHEET 12
ON -SITE BUFFER L E N N A R®
C HWY 150
WETLANDS WK
DICKSON800 $00 1600
STREAM CHANNEL SCALE: 1" - 800'
community fnfrc�strucfure consultants -
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 388
CHARLOTTE, NO 28283
([J78M13345398
(170O 3 78
W W W.WKDICK OMCOM
NCLICENSENO.F-0 74
U)
LU
N W
Z W 0 j
_ ::I~N 00
� Q (n N F
U Q (Z.)0 Q W'Z
00 = BE EU
LL I-J F L
Z O LU OJ L U
F
Q U)
= J
BE Q BE
Q Z U C) J
BEU)J W
O
a o
PRO,L MGR.: MR
DESIGN BV: KWR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PRO,L DATE: SEP 2828
DRAWING NUMBER:
2OF14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 8

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE
EXIISTSTREAM I \) I 50'STREAM BUFFER
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
CULVERT #1
120
40
TOP OF BANK PERENNIAL STREAMI
II J(±5,825LF)
_
CULVERT#2
135
40
CULVERT#3
50'STREAM
��
BUFFER���,.;-_-=_��A// fv_
-WAIVER
236
0
A� \�v,`4 PROP.
- �� �_��
PUMP INLET LOCATION
1 I 1
REQUESTED
VA\yA FLOW DIRECTION, \
1( AAI
yam\
h
N
1 I
V I I I 1
�1
STREAMA SEWER
CROSSING
0
25
\��_��.�-� _ \
)���_-_�_� AAI V I
(��i
PROP. COFFER DAM
I I/ A l
STREAM M CULVERT
35
20
�� f�Jl� IIIIf l
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
EXTENSION
2:1SLOPE I I A A\
(20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT)
I I I A\ Y
TOTAL
526
125
��
1 _/
\ 1 1 L0 I III V
INV.±802.0
fV A 1
Q
1 1 11j11 �v
'I I I
.� 1111
IPROP.CAST-IN-PLACE
I I I I 1 1
S
1 1 ITP�• V%
CULVERT HEADWALL
1 ( 1 I
882Q
IIII
PROP. WATERLINE
(TYPJ
11 I A
1\
[ 1 A \
I
/
3:1 SLOPE
v
1
815
/
M�
J±120
STREAM IMPACT LF OF 1 I
11
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
1.
820
•815
� �
�<�
8.0
810
00.
8� $
3:1 SLOPE
I
1
r /
PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) I
1A (
\ IAA A T
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE 1 II IV
CULVERT HEADWALL
11V
1 I�II�
A IIIIIO
IV
v�% 1111
I
A IIIIIZ
_
v �y 1 1 I I 1d11.
jell ,
50' STREAM
BUFFER
LEGEND:
ON —SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
E�:] STREAM CHANNEL
PROP. STORM
1 PROP. 106 LF 144"
STRUCTURE (TYP.)
/ CIRCULAR CMP -
-
V CULVERT (BURIED T)
-
1
PROP. STORM
PROP. 106 LF 96'
CIRCULAR CMP 1
PROP. SSMH (TYP.) DRAINAGE (TYP.)
i
CULVERT �
PROP. SANITARY
SEWER(TYP.) �\
I
III 810
v
11
IIIIII / 1 �
1111I v INV.±801.4
.IVAAV1 A I / I I
- 3:1 SLOPE
11 A \ PROP. COFFER DAM
1 (1 1 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)
(20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT)
50' ST� ER
�
�\ \ PROP. PUMP DISC' RG`E LOCATION
LENNAM
1
PROPOSED CULVERT
NOTE:
1 - 144" CMP, 2 - 96" CMP
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
LENGTH: 106 FT
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE
UPSTREAM INV: 802.00
U.S. BUT SHALL NOT BE MORE
THAN 45 DAYS.
DOWNSTREAM INV: 801.40
WIC50 0 50 100
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants SCALE: 1" = 50'
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 388
CHARLOTTE, NO 282
([J78M1339-5398
(170a aao78
W W W.WKDICKSOMCDM
NO LICENSE NO.F-0 74
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2828
DRAWING NUMBER:
3OF14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
20200263002E
Figure 9

840
840
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD
SUITE 380
STREET
CHARLOTTE, NO
([J]OM13345398
28283
(170O 3498]8
835
835
W W W. WKq CK OMCOM
NO LICENSE NO.F-0
74
830
830
825
825
<
820
820
p,
77
Z
O
PROP. 12"
F
WATERMAINLU
N
U
0
815
815
OL os�
BE n N
o
U p Z
0=
U
O
0 Q W
O W
0
Q
3
Zf
W W O
W
-
-
810
810
0 °QBE
I--
Q
Z Z U U
Q Z
co
_
q
U J N
Z
3
Z
W
0
W
805
805
1L
0
800
800
8
a
o
o
E
F
795
795 0
a
00
a
o
6+00 6+50
7+00 7+50
8+00
8+50
9+00
9+50 10+00
o
0
j
PRO1. MGR.: MR
8
0 8
16
80
0 80
16
DESIGN BV: KWR
DRAWN BV: JJL
'e
O
PRQI. DATE: SEP
DRAWING NUMBER:
2828
4OF14
SCALE: 1" = 8' VERTICLE
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
WKD PROJ. NO.'.
2020026300CL
PROP.
to
J
z
m
O
OF
z
PROP. STORM
CATCH BASIN
PROP. STORM
CATCH BASIN
PROP. GRADE �
ROAD CENTERLINE
PROP. STORM
CATCH BASIN
24" RCP
PROP.
24" RCP
PROP. 24"
RCP
EXIST. GRADE �
ROAD CENTERLINE
PROP. 106
CIRCULAR
LF 96"
CMP
CULVERT INV.
±806.4
/
PROP. 106 LF 96" 1
'/
CIRCULAR CMP 1
PROP. B"SANITARY
CULVERT INV. ±806.4 1
SEWER
1
II
1
IT
PROP. 106 LF 144"
CIRCULAR CMP
BURIED 1'
CULVERT INV. ±g01.4
PROP. SANITARY
SEWER
MANHOLE-86
PROP.
GRADE
EXIST. GRADE
� �
� O
p O
p N
� 00
� �
� �
Q N
�
Figure 10

840
835
830
825
PROP. 24" STORM CULVERT
PROP. 12" WATERMAIN
820
PROP.GRADE
100-YR. 81 fi.41 _ _ 816.0 815.4
815 .—.—. .—.—. 814.0 813.I
10-YR811.59 — —
PROP CAST -IN-PLACE 7/m/17/m//
840
835
830
825
820
815
810 CULVERT HEADWALL PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE — 810
144" CIRCULAR CULVERT HEADWALL
2-YR: L 56 — — CM CULVERT
(BURIED 1')
LENGTH =±106'
SLOPE = ±0.57% EXIST. GRADE
805 8030 805
r
-
- -
4�2_801.4
802.4
D802.0800 800
PROP. GRADE
EXIST. GRADE
795
795
rn
.�
o rn
O 0
o
m m
O co
co 0
po
O C7
0
ooDO
O N
0
coco
0O
co 0
O
IN
N O N
0 0
�
co
co coco 00
0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50 3+00
8 0 8 16
SCALE: 1" = 8' VERTICLE
80 0 80 16
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STRLET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([7043345398
(17043349078
W W W. WKDICK OMCOM
NO
LICENSE NO.F-0 74
W
W QN
LU J
Q Z LU F 0 LL
°
BEU) N
O
� Z Q W Q �
O O w g
Q
Z W , W O
2 BE
BE BEBE U)
J
Z Z U =
Q Z U Z
U) J N LU
LU
BE
0-
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: KWR
DRAWN BY: JUL
PRO,L DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
5OF14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 11

840 840
t1;lAl1� ------ ��2�1M
825 825
PROP. 24" STORM CULVERT PROP. GRADE
PROP. 12" WATERMAIN
820 820
100-'VR: 816.41 , , — , — , 816.0 815.4
815 — — — — 814.0 813.4— 815
25-YR_813.34 — —
96, CIRCULAR
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE CMP CULVERT PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE —
810 CULVERT HEADWALL LENGTH =±106' CULVERT HEADWALL 810
2-YR: 808:56 — — SLOPE_±O %
806.0 805.4
805 �' , 805
EXIST. GRADE
802.0
800 8014 800
PROP. GRADE
EXIST. GRADE
795 rn rn
rn 00
o rn
O 0
o m
m 795
O co
CO �
O M
co �
O N
0p
O C
00 00
O C\i
00 co
O CV
00 00
0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50 3+00
8 0 8 16
SCALE: 1" = 8' VERTICLE
80 0 80 16
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE"
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([70M13345398
(170M133 78
W W W. WKUCK ON.COM
NO
LICENSE NO.F-0 74
W
B) �
W QN
V J
Lu
0 7
Q (q N 0=0-
Q W QU
Z
O O EL g
Q
ZW 0 w 0
Q c)
J
Q Q
Q Q
Z Z U Q
Q Z U Z
� J ON Z
ro Q
W
d
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: KWR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
6OF14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 12

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE
I -WAIVER 1 236 1 0 1
CROSSING 0 25
STREAM M CULVERT 1 35 1 20
EXTENSION
1
1
1
11:
A A A
50'STREAM BUFFER
� 21 SLOPE
V I
— EXIST. STREAM V �
—_ TOP OF BANK �
` PERENNIAL STIR
M (16,135 L
9,
9J95
Znll
=-
PROP. PUMP DISCHARGE LOCATION
800 ` 795
F)
50' STREFER AM BUF
PROP. COFFER DAM \ V A
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
v �\ (20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT)
,PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 \
� • �� A � CULVERT HEADWALL
PROP. SANITARY SEWER
`EASEMENT (TYP.)
.PROP. SANITARY
vSEWER (TYP.) A
lop 15
0,CO 810
\ � � PROP. STORM��}— --- —-------- —
1 1 V I STRUCTURE (TYPJ�—
� PROP. SSMH (TYP.)
PROP. 128 LF 144"
v PROP. STORM
CIRCULAR CMP 1
DRAINAGE (TYPJ� \
CULVERT (BURIED 1') �
vPROP. WATERLINE (TYP.)
PROP. 128 LF 108" �
CIRCULAR CMP �
CULVERT (BURIED 1') A
o PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.)
w—
o I Av w
a�
v I
3:L_ I to 1 1 1 805
SLOPE'fN
3:1
- �2:1 SLOPE
PROP. COFFER DAM
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) \
(20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT) � /y\
PROP. PUMP INLET LOCATION � \
I _ 1
50'STREAM BUFFER ----_ �
I 1 1
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE
II I I I 1 � 11 CULVERT HEADWALL �
LEGEND:
ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
STREAM CHANNEL
vv 805 w
INV. 1791.9 1 A A 1 l A � � A
2:1 SLOPE
\
� Q�` AAA
STREAM BUFFER 1 I 1 II
PROPOSED CULVERT
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
MPACTS
45 DAYSL NOT BE MORE
L
1 - 144" CMP, 2 -108" CMP
LENGTH: 128 FT
UPSTREAM INV: 791.90
DOWNSTREAM INV: 791.50
F kam WDICKSON
W K
50 0 50 100
community infrastructure consultants SCALE: 1" = 50'
MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE aoo
CHARLOTTE, NO 282a3
([J7aM1.939-5398
Iry]a�aaao]e
WWW.WKq CKSON.COM
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
UBE
)
W
N
g
� Z w ro
d U m U
QU U7 N
pOQ
O = BLU E w �
OW
z O g ° w
o QQQ BE
as
Z
W (15 �
= O
J m Z
z
W
d
a
PROI. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN By
JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2a2a
DRAWING NUMBER:
70F14
WKD PROJ. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure13
3:1
- �2:1 SLOPE
PROP. COFFER DAM
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) \
(20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT) � /y\
PROP. PUMP INLET LOCATION � \
I _ 1
50'STREAM BUFFER ----_ �
I 1 1
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE
II I I I 1 � 11 CULVERT HEADWALL �
LEGEND:
ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
STREAM CHANNEL
vv 805 w
INV. 1791.9 1 A A 1 l A � � A
2:1 SLOPE
\
� Q�` AAA
STREAM BUFFER 1 I 1 II
PROPOSED CULVERT
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
MPACTS
45 DAYSL NOT BE MORE
L
1 - 144" CMP, 2 -108" CMP
LENGTH: 128 FT
UPSTREAM INV: 791.90
DOWNSTREAM INV: 791.50
F kam WDICKSON
W K
50 0 50 100
community infrastructure consultants SCALE: 1" = 50'
MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE aoo
CHARLOTTE, NO 282a3
([J7aM1.939-5398
Iry]a�aaao]e
WWW.WKq CKSON.COM
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
UBE
)
W
N
g
� Z w ro
d U m U
QU U7 N
pOQ
O = BLU E w �
OW
z O g ° w
o QQQ BE
as
Z
W (15 �
= O
J m Z
z
W
d
a
PROI. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN By
JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2a2a
DRAWING NUMBER:
70F14
WKD PROJ. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure13

i
1213 WuMOREHEAD
SUI E300
CHARLOTTE, NC
STREET
28203
8
([J]OM1334_
(170O 3 78
W W W. WK.--ON.C.M
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
O
N
W
o
C.
¢ Z F O
n
= J—
(n
g
O - m
Q n N
O
B=
U
U Z
0
00O=0w
O
> , F
Z O g 00
Q
Q
Oz
BE
Q Q BE
w
Z Z U =
Q Z U
J
Q
J ro
Z
BE
0
W
0
0
8
0
3
¢
0cl
g
a
00
00 Do
o
o
j
PRW. MGR.: MR
8
0
8 16
80
0
80
16
DESIGN BV: KWR
DRAWN BV: JJL
'2
O
PROI. DATE: SEP
DRAWING NUMBER:
2020
8OF14
SCALE:
1" = 8' VERTICLE
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
WKD PROJ. NO.'.
2020026300CL
830
s
830
\ EXIST.
\ � ROAD
GRADE
CENTERLINE
a
w
w
\\
Z
825
\
\
PROP. GRADE �
825
ROAD CENTERLINE
\
820
PROP. STORM
,Q
"20
CATCH BASIN
PROP.
STORM
CATCH
BASIN
\
PROP. STORM
\
CATCH BASIN
815
`
815
PROP. 30"
RCP
1
1
1
I
i
11
�
810
810
1�
/
�
PROP. 12"
PROP. 30" RCP
WATERMAIN
1 I
\1 PROP. 128 LF 108"
805
\ CULVERT INV. 945
PROP. 30" RCP
/
805
1 I
/
PROP. 128 LF 144'•
PROP. 128 LE108" �
CIRCULAR CMP
CIRCULAR CMP
�
CULVERT INV. ±7g1.5
CULVERT INV. ±7gq.5
1\
/
800
Q
800
1
1
1
PROP. 8"
SANITARY
795
SEWER
795
PROP.
SANITARY
I
SEWER
MANHOLE-94
BURIE 1'
PROP. SANITARY
790
SEWER
MANHOLE-2
790
PROP.
GRADE
EXIST. GRADE
PROP.
8" SANITARY
SEWER
785 � 0 0 0 0 o O o O o M M O o N 785
�� N
uj � rn aj � � rn aj � co rn � rn � c0 � nj N
I'7 M N N Q1 � CA � Ql � Q1 � O �
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00
Figure 14

ojo
=QH
� O
830
825
820
830
825
820
815
PROP. 12" WATERMAIN
1 I
PROP.GRADE
815
-PROP. 30"
STORM CULVERT
810
810
00-YR, 808.69
0-YR: 806.21
805.9
805.5
805
805
- _ _
_ _
803.9
803.5
-YR_802.40
_ _
F//
7/7/////
7
-1
oo
800
44"CIRCULAR
CMP CULVERT
Uoo
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE
(BURIED 1')
CULVERT HEADWALL
PROP. CAST -IN
-PLACE
LENGTH =±128'
CULVERT HEADWALL
SLOPE _ ±0.31%
EXIST. GRADE
795
795
792.9
,
-- ---
,
792.5
--- --- --
-- --
-- - BU ED 1'
791.5 790
790
PROP. GRADE
EXIST. G
JADE
PROP. 8" SANITARY SEWER
785
785
o 0 0 0
ti o m o�
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
2+50 3+00
8 0 8 16
SCALE: 1" = 8' VERTICLE
80 0 80 16
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE"
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([70M13345398
(170M133 78
W W W.WKUCK ON.COM
NC LICENSE NO.F-0
W
W Q J
d Z W 0
J W
d O M,om
Q V) N �
O
Z O Q W O
Q
W
3: O , W O Q
Z O g J F
Q
Z ZQ
U = J
Q Z U
Z
J 0 W
W
d
Ud
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: KWR
DRAWN BY: J L
PRW. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
9OF14
WKD PRO'. NO.'.
202002.001L
Figure 16

ojo
=QH
� O
830 830
t_yT�l� -----� �•LT�1
PROP.
GRADE
815
815
1
PROP.
12" WATERMAIN
1
PROP, 30"
STORM CULVERT
810
810
100-YR: 808.69
50-YR: 806.21
805.9
805.5
805
805
5-, _ . — .
— . — .
803.9
803.5
800
"CIRCULAR
800
2-YR:799:00
. — .
PROP. CAST -IN
CMP CULVERT
-PLACE
LENGTH =±128'
CULVERT HEADWALL
PROP. CAST -IN -PLACE
SLOPE
_ �.31%
CULVERT HEADWALL
7�5
795
794.9
795
791.9
EXIST. GRADE
791.5 790
790
PROP. GRADE
EXIST. GIADE
PROP. 8" SANITARY SEWER
785
785
rn O 0 0 0
o O m
r- 0) �
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
2+50 3+00
8 0 8 16
SCALE: 1" = 8' VERTICLE
80 0 80 16
SCALE: 1" = 80' HORIZONTAL
i
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([7043345398
(fJ7043349078
W W W. WKDICKSON.COM
NCLICENSENO.F-0 L
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: KWR
DRAWN BY: J L
PRO,L DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
10OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
20200263001L
Figure 17

NOTE:
SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY SOURCE
AND CONVEYANCE PLAN TO BE
/
DETERMINED BY SUBSURFACE
ENGINEERS IN THE FIELD.
1 pp1 ( I
OD `v
CD I I
v v�
Cn
1
I \
45
/
PROP.
I WATERLINE
\ (TYP.) C
I
,
OU
1 \
/ I
PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE ` j 11 II yr
i
�V / / / --------- --
/ PROP. SSMH (TYP.)
1 . PROP. SANITARY
r— SEWER (TYP
,
'$SO'
PROP. STORM � S�� / ,` '� i — vV — _ �� ��� V � )\� v v ♦ _
STRUCTURE (TYP.) =_���' ,' ��� _ _ - ♦ `v ` -h- ` --
/ PROP. SANITARY SEWER_ -
�� EASEMENT
—— _ � �
50-STREAMBUFFER
2:1 SLOPEeD
WETLAND XX TO BE
FILLED (±55 SF) INTERMITTENT STREAM A
(10.01 AC) - __,(±1 ,492 LF,±236 LF TO BE
FILLED)
( _f =-
----DOWNSTREAM END OF j
';WAIVER STUDY REACHXIV
840
-845
DO N
PERMANENT TEMPORARY I A / V-_-�� �,vv VA 50' STREAM BUFFER _
CULVERT#1 120 40 \ \ \� \� --_-_ ��_ - �% _- ---�
CULVERT #2 135 40 PROP. SANITARY
:ULVERT #3SEWER
(TYP.)
-WAIVER
2EQUESTED
236
0
` _�--___---_�_-
V A 1 �� -� - PROP.STORM 1 - lu - _- -
/ A A - - _
PROP. SANITARY SEWER DRAINAGE (TYP.) �1A \\\ t�,p - - - _____-
EASEMENT (TYP.)
1
tEAMASEWER
CROSSING
0
25
°AMMCULVERT
EXTENSION
I 35
20
TOTAL
1 526
1 125
LEGEND:
ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
STREAM CHANNEL
LENNAR
WIC
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY /
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE
U.S. BUT SHALL NOT BE MORE
THAN 45 DAYS. / \
50 0 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
D1
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE"
CHARLOTTE, NO 28203
([ 70345398
(170O 3 78
W W W.WKDICK OMCOM
NCLICENSENO.F-0 74
LU
z
U
m
Z LU m X
J
Q q N Z¢
10
U
O w O Z LU LU
Ed
z W O
z
Q Z U U
�
LU O W
m
BE
CO
I-
z
LU
BE
LU
Z
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
11 OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.
2020026300CL
Figure 18

NOTE:
SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY SOURCE
AND CONVEYANCE PLAN TO BE
DETERMINED BY SUBSURFACE
ENGINEERS IN THE FIELD. vv v`v V A
vV`vAv`wv v V v♦v�v vAA�vvAAVAv \vvvvAA
vv�vwvvvi��wvvvA01)
8 (Zp to
�5 v vv�0
815
000MANWE
--183
v 182
v A v2.1SLOPE
PROP. SANITARY SEWER - i
v EASEMENT(TYPJ
PROP. SANITARY-
830 SEWER (TYP.) --
mw
[[grim
��—Alm—
PROP,
v vv vv A/ ` WATERLINE !- I I J v J
.v A 815 �� AV A v vv A v A\V v \\ (TYP.�_v I-
v vv ,co' v _ //
5
805 8� 1 vv `vvv
31 SLOPE 810
/ �v�vv /vvvv �I��1vv vvv VAv03v��i'/i �� ��/'��
v- A ` v,��� V A '��i WETLANDS(±101SF)
�%/////(�.002AC) /��/v ��� /
INTERMITTENT STREAM R I / / / / / / / � / / / / / / /
lid '//l�lh AAAV111 1 1 (t�l 67 LF) I 1 / I I ' / / / / / PROPERTY BOUNDARY �P!/// i
-� i j�
PERENNIAL STREAM
(±6.1351)
50' STREAM BUFFER
k /
LEGEND:
ON —SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
E�:] STREAM CHANNEL
LENNAM
F kWIC
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE
U.S. BUT SHALL NOT BE MORE
THAN 45 DAYS.
50 0 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 388
CHARLOTTE, NO 282
([ 708 39-5398
(1708 349878
W W W.WKDICK OMCOM
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
N W
Q Z LU 0 Z
.QoDq N n
d
U
Q W Q Z U
O OLL r,W d
3 , W O
Z O2J D_
Q
Z
BEQ
Q Q
Z
(15
U W m LU
z
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2828
DRAWING NUMBER:
12 OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 19

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE v vICo1x
IIII�v1v1//IIA\Vvv CID P
PERMANENT TEMPORARY UIk'vAvv vv, IQ�
CULVERT#1 120 40 A1\AAA 0
CULVERT#2135 40 W
/ l
CULVERT#3 I l OD, V A I
-WAIVER 236 0
REQUESTED
STREAM A SEWER 1
0 25
CROSSING
STREAM M CULVERT 35 20 50' STREAM
EXTENSION I V A 1 1 A A 1
TOTAL 526 125 \ 1 \ \V A p II A A \ INTERMITTENT STREAM ASV vv BUFFER-----_i
\ II��II 1 \ (±1.492LF)
1 l 1 1 1 i U' II \
/ 50' STREAM I I I A l l/ III II A l , A 1 1 1 1 A 1 AV A A I I AVM l
BUFFER
J
�I v A � ( / / / / I I II ����� 11I I I I I I 1/ � v I) � ♦ �� �— � �— ---__—
45—'J
I PROP. PUMP / ///I
INLET LOCATION �� �/.I 1 AAVAI I \ l \Vv� I � _ If_ —_------
PROP. COFFER DAM
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
840
:'STREAM IMPACT A 25 LF OF
Q
V , / / / — — TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
JFOR OPEN- CUT OFPROP. — --�i—V .'—� —�� — it I
SANITARY SEWER PROP. SANITARY- — --
/ SEWER (TYP.)
PROP. SANITARY SEWER
i
i / 835 EASEMENT (TYP.)
PROP. COFFERDAM
APPROVED EQUAL)
�(OR —
PROP. PUMP —
��
DISCHARGE LOCATION
WETLAND BE (±4,523 SF) —
/��•'/
/�—�)
LEGEND:
ON —SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
STREAM CHANNEL
1
PERENNIAL STREAM M —
\\`—
(±6,135 LF)
LENN
IDIC
V A
50' STREAM
BUFFER ++
--
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE
U.S. BUT SHALL NOT BE MORE
THAN 45 DAYS.
1 1 1 1 1
rork
community infrastructure consultants
SCALE: 1" = 50'
21DMORE
SUITE 388
CHARLOTTE, NO 282
([J7OM13345398
(170349878
W W W.WKDICK OMCOM
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
LO LU 2i
N
W Q Lu W i
Q LU
Z r U)
Cn
U Z
p0 W BE LLI
BE
UB I- U
3 O I- I- F d
z og °
L,
o aa= rZ
U
Z
W I-Q WO N
BE
Z U
Ud
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BV: KWR
DRAWN BV: JJL
PREU DATE: I SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
13OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 20

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE
UULVtKI JFS
-WAIVER
236
0
REQUESTED
\1
REAM A SEWER
CROSSING
0
25
EAM M CULVERT
EXTENSION
35
20
1
\
PROP. SANITARY
SEWER (TYP.)
\
\
1
\
1
A.
�I EXISTING 6x6' -
I CONCRETE BOX
CULVERT
/ I
\ 1
NN
EXISTING SANITARY \
SEWER FORCE 1
MAIN (TYP.)
S
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER (TYP.) I
EXISTING STORM
DRAINAGE (TYP.) 1
LEGEND:
ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER
WETLANDS
E�:] STREAM CHANNEL
N
EX. HEADWALL +
TO BE REMOVED 1
I1 111� 1 I 1 III �I
I \ ly I
11
PROP. SILT FENCE /�, 8J0 _ 850 -
50- STREAM /
BUFFER i
/,'' ' / ; ----
PROP. LIMITS OF - _ = i AM / M
-�/ �'
'DISTURBANCE (LOD) �� ;PERENNIALSTRE��, (±6 135 LF)
fl IT
ram_ _iupp Y/' ,---- v --' —
�il�CO
�v
v��
nl
t vv
( 21 SLOPE
\1A\ STREAM IMPACTM±30LFOF-�840-_-,����
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT -- -- -
U1 11 I V.vN: / - - - - - STREAM IMPACT M±20 LF OF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT / v ✓
00
CID
u
\ r—
�_�� V PROPERTY�-
V /Q �� PERENNIAL STREAM N I/ _"BOUNDARY \ --
v O O (±50 LF) yy11 _ (TYP.)
I PROP. S'x 15'
III RIPRAP APRON_--
v
-------------
--------
PROPOSED 23 LF 6' x 6' @ 1.48%CONCRETE / l�
BOX CULVERT AND HEADWALL EXTENSION
00(TO BE INSTALLED BY NCDEQ APPROVED
()1 I-,- MEANS AND METHODS) A /
00
00
SO .III ♦ \ IIII / 1
( �-v Ilillly 11'j��(Ir�
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE AMOUNT OF TEMPORARY
CTS
WATERSOFTHE
THAN 45 DAYS. NOT BE MORE
L E N N A R THAN
50 0 50 100
FDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
SCALE: 1" = 50'
MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 388
CHARLOTTE, NO 282
(h]a4339-5398
(170a 78
W W W.WKUCKSOMCDM
NC LICENSE NO.F-03]4
W
z
d
U
_ IL
W Q V
Z LU 0 Z
_ -::!~� O
0
Q V) N Z
U QU
Z X
U0W =O LLI W
Z Og OJ LU
Q J
a: U
Q Q
Q zvv g
LU
ro H
W
IS
U)
J
Q
LU
LU
IL
a
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: MR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
14OF 14
WKD PROD. NO.
202002)300CL
Figure 21

1. UPON COMPLETION OF Sff*$kM CROSSING WOW, CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFRL
AND MECIHANICALLY TAMP (NO SPECIFIC DENSITY) SOILS INTO PLACE AND DRESS
0STURBFa SURFACES
7. BEGL4NING AT A POINT Z' AGOVC WATER SUICFAQ� FLEVATIft GRASS DHSTTIRLTEO
AREAS (SEED. FERTILIZER N STRAW MULCH) STREAM BANK. TOP OF RANK ANO
0Im1 AREAS UPLAND CF STWAM
& INSTALL COIL FIBER NETMAT STARTING WIMUM W BELOW WATER 9.$VACE
ELEVAIION AND ETCTElDPIG A MIN"M 'S' BEYOND TOP OF SAW. MINIMUM
SPEOnCARONS FOR CM FRIER NET/UAT AS FOC JM!
MIN THICOESS GF 070 INCHES
1002 COCONUT FAR AND WOVEN MTO TRINE
AVG WEIGHT OF IO OUNCES/SG, VIO.
A, COIN FIBER NET/MAT S CALL BE summIY HiEm IN PLACE TRTH v5E OF WIDOOEN
STAKED AND WLRE STAPLES (AS WMED)
5. INSTALL LIVE STAKES BEGCNNINC AT WATER SURFACE Ef.EVATION AND ExTEMMO
2 VERTICAL FTFT UP THE STREAM BANK. SEE LJVE STARE OETA#. FOR
ADDITIONAL REGUIRETI%NTS-
6. INSTALL SLT FENCE W/NYRE REINFORiEMENT ALONG TOP OF OANW (AOJACENT TO
END OF COIR FIBER NFT/MAT) FOR IMIDIH ❑f MTURBEi1 SOILS
WATER 91JRFACE ELEVATION
FIGURE NO.
22
CDC LImR NFT/MAT
GRASS (SEn, MULCH A FMIXIIE)
RENAMING DFSTURBEO STREAM BANK
AREAS 4KxUONG TOPS OF BANK
(UN" COIR NEI/1AAT)
LIVE STAKE (1WLLOWS ❑R -
WECI S APPRGVEn RY
COWAMC) I M FIRST 74'
ABOVE NORMAL 1WVTER
SLWA(E ELEVATION
R4'L
I. LIEE $T1►[ES AW.L BE APPNO]IWATELY 24' 1N LENCII,
2. UVE VANES SHALL HE N LMAMETER AT 1K 4YIL
OF PLANTING
d UVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WALLOW OR SPECIES
SPECIFIED BY CCE/DH£C OR CANBIIITAMT
N
* 4. meryaS SHALL Ei DdiWWT AT THE T%IE M ACOi1NSil100
^ AND PLAITING AMLI LOCALLY CNOVIN/MARV£STED
S, UW STAKES SHALL WE SPACER S O-C.
& LIME STAKES DtALL BE FLANTEO A MIND M OF IS' IN
CEPTH W11H KO 49RE THAN 4'-S' OF STAKE EXPOSED
LIVE ]DETAIL
WSTA LL SILT FENCE
EKTEAO ❑OCR F1BCR MAT REINFORCED WITH HGG
W LEY" TVP DF y,W WE AT TV OF OM14
(ED 1 Hi COIR "W
NETIVAT]
I
. 'AM Rt" (SHUT OR INIVIIIJ
►Y BE USED TO REFORM
'REAM BANK (STA09M), I&- Or
NIL SHALL COVER YIREAM
OF FACE CIF Rm STACIL
!SE OF ROM TO ANCHOR BANK
I I I �'-EXTEHO CXW FIRM NETAIAT
I - Tx BELOW WA ILA %AFACL
&EVAUM
5 O 2.6 5 10 29 O 10 2D
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE 11ORMONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
KELLSWATER
Cabarrus Co., NC
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION DETAIL
TYPICAL DETAIL — N.T.S.
Drawn By: I Reviewed By:
DCK LSR
DATE:
8/15/19

O
.4—j
c�
.E
v
v
we
jurisdictional
Determination Information

APPROXIMATE MAP
Wetland G �� TY
•� (-0.004 acres)'
•�J �1
=r 1"
{� } Wetland H
(-0.006 acres)
- .�.��. , �� � ��
l Wetland I -�
� (-0.010 acres) - J , _ � � •-,
` Perennial Stream L=
(-1,044 L.F., 0.12 acres) 20
Perennial Stream J
(-5,825 L.F., 1.39 acres)
rI'
I,
•
P
Perennial Stream K 21
ZjfJJ_ �)
(-95 L.F., 0.01 acres)
_ r
710
22 17
\�
'•
Wetland U (-0.062 ac.)
16
_
.I
/1' Y (Dc4)
Wetland V (-0.02 ac.)15
.`. upland Data
�� Form (DP2
Intermittent Stream W
Wetland Data (-141 L.F., 0.010 acres) j
(-1.D7 acres) .. S r 1' Form IDP1)
r 13c 1
Intermittent Stream E 1 13
(407 L.F.)
Data
Fo
Intermittent
_
Stream Q
(Dps)
Intermittent Stream AA if, �.�
(_ 187 L.F.
i •• 0.013 acres)
(-55 L.F.) e :C(S'S�,(q
-•r .
i _
Intermittent Stream A �� -
(-1492 L.F.) �• A, .._
— 10
r
Wetland XX ` t `: ! J
_
(-0.001 acres) Wetland S
�_ 7 '�•' �_ �'
J wO
stream
��
(-0.002 acres)
Wetland P
r — (-0.008 acres)
Farm
YWetland BB L .
\ !2
(-0.104 acres)
ri
Intermittent Stream R -
(-167 L.F., 0.012 acres) '
f
-t.: -=•
Stream M 2 f
�
Perennial
Stream N
(-100 L.F., 0.02l
acres)+
'
0 375 760 1,500
Feet
LEGEND
"Update based on USACE field verification
(07110119)
111 Tributary
® Wetland
Photo location and direction
LOCATION
Lat: 35.57236 2N
Long:-81.05660 2W
KEY
Current
Q Project boundary study limits
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Boundary
JD Boundary
FIGURE NO.
Acres:
+/-380
SHANNON WOODS
Catawba County, NC
Drawn by: Reviewed by:
JAL, P1K -SR
23
Prepared For.
LENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC -
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd
Date:
05/20,19
"Revised
APPROXIMATE WETLAND MAP
USACE FIELD VERIFICATION UPDATE 07/10/19
07110119
For study purposes only: Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Charlotte, NC 28226

PHOTO 1: Perennial Stream N, facing downslope.
PHOTO 2: Non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing downslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 3a: Intermittent Stream O, near origin, facing downslope.
PHOTO 3b: Near origin of Intermittent Stream 0, facing upslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

a

0Ya
■

PHOTO 8: Non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing upslope.
PHOTO 8a: Non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing downslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 9: Perennial Stream B, facing upslope.
PHOTO 10: Intermittent Stream R and adjacent Wetland S, facing downslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 11: Intermittent Stream Q, facing downslope.
PHOTO 12: Floodplain area previously used for a nursery
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

a

PHOTO 13c: Non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing upslope.
PHOTO 14: Wetland T (facing upslope).
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 15: Wetland X, facing downslope.
PHOTO 16: Wetland U, facing downslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

� F
="
r
+ s
�� •r^ fi n S 4 �. - -
6 � 5
rS
{�
,fir qk
AA
T
■

-
aE
F h
a

PHOTO 19: Wetland G, facing downslope.
PHOTO 20: Non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing upslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 21: Perennial Stream L, facing upslope.
PHOTO 22: Perennial Stream J, facing north.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119-05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

W1, MC1,sW
a

PHOTO 24b: Origin of Intermittent Stream D, facing upslope.
Shannon Woods; Catawba County, INC
Representative Landscape Photographs — Photos taken 01130119 - 05114119
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

a-J
V)
a-J
V)
1
07
N
i
N
Waiver Request
Study

Ph W I <
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
October 8, 2020
Christian Jones
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
RE: Shannon Woods Subdivision
Stream 'A' Disturbance
20200263.00.CL
Mr. Jones:
It is our understanding that the United States Army Corps of Engineers is requesting supporting
information regarding a waiver request for the impacts to Intermittent Stream 'A' (See the attached
Stream 'A' Location Exhibit) on the Shannon Woods Subdivision project. WK Dickson has reviewed
the Site Plan & Stream Disturbance and provides the following details.
It is important to note that all of the roadway crossings associated with this project will be maintained
by NCDOT upon completion of construction and are subsequently required to be designed to
NCDOT roadway design standards. In general, NCDOT roadway design standards are more
strictive than most Municipal standards. Below are a few NCDOT standards which are impacting
this project:
• NCDOT does not allow structural retaining walls to be utilized for fill slope support adjacent
to roadways. This makes grading out fill slopes adjacent to roadways difficult in areas that
have steep existing topography.
• NCDOT has stringent foundations requirements for Bottomless Culverts which requires high
quality bedrock to be present as foundation bedding material. Bottomless Culverts cannot be
installed on streams which lack this type of bedrock.
Maiden Creek Way which bisects the upper end of Stream 'A' has been classified by NCDOT as a
Collector Street to provide the Shannon Woods Subdivision and future surrounding developments
with adequate street infrastructure to handle ultimate traffic demands. Roadways that are classified
as collector streets by NCDOT require larger street cross -sections, larger road radii and a more
1213 W. Morehead Street
Suite 300
Charlotte, NC 28208
Tel. [phone]
www.wkdickson.com Aviation 9 Water Resources 9 Community Development • Energy

Mr. Jones
October 29, 2020
Page 2
gradual grade than local subdivision streets to provide a safe throughfare for traffic and pedestrians.
The current design for Maiden Creek Way in the area of Stream 'A' has a relatively steep longitudinal
slope for a collector street. To mitigate this road slope, the roadway was designed with a larger
horizontal radius which provides better sight distance, safety parameters and driving conditions.
To avoid the Stream 'A' disturbance, Maiden Creek Way would have to be designed with multiple
reverse curves that have small radii which would result in a roadway that is does not have collector
street characteristics and has subpar sight distance. This condition would create an unsafe
environment for the adjacent homeowners, pedestrians and motorists within the Shannon Woods
Subdivision and would reduce the benefits & quality of life that the collector street provides the
surrounding area.
The natural conditions of the property and Stream'A' is creating a scenario that makes the design &
construction of Maiden Creek Way difficult without disturbing a portion of the stream. The County
is requiring a 50' property buffer to provide the surrounding rural area with screening from the
subdivision to help maintain the adjacent property owner's current quality of life. This property
buffer is within close proximity of Stream 'A' and limits the potential design alternatives for the
collector street. The portion of Stream 'A' that we are proposing to disturb is within a 25' deep ravine
with approximate 1:1 side slope and 7% longitudinal slope. These conditions are creating more
stream disturbance than a normal stream crossing because the amount of tie-in slope needed to
transition from the roadway elevation to the existing stream elevation.
Lastly, NCDOT does not allow retaining walls adjacent to their roadways due to maintenance
concerns. Since Maiden Creek Way is required to be designed to NCDOT standards, this is limiting
the engineer's ability to reduce the stream disturbance by installing a retaining wall along the
roadway. This design criteria is resulting in the current design conditions which shows a 30' high fill
slope with a 2:1 side slope that is causing an additional +/-1151f of stream disturbance.
In conclusion, it has been one of our core focuses to be very conscious of the existing environmental
and cultural conditions at this site as we have proceeded through the initial planning, rezoning, and
design phases. The overall site plan that you see today has underwent several layout revisions as
we've fought to protect the integrity of the land while making sure we provide a safe, livable
community of which future residents can be proud, while also allowing them to include the natural
environment into their everyday lives. For example, during the rezoning process, the County initially
asked that we make a fourth (4111) stream crossing in the northern part of the site to maximize road
connectivity. In order to provide additional connectivity while avoiding an environmental impact
we saw as unnecessary; the proposed road network was rearranged to provide multiple access points
IICKSON

Mr. Jones
October 29, 2020
Page 3
to almost every lot in the community. Our goal has been to utilize the safest possible design practices
while preserving as much of the surrounding natural environment as possible, and we believe the
current design has achieved that goal.
Sincerely,
W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc.
Weston Boles, PE
Community Development
Program Manager
IICKSON

PROPOSED STREAM DISTURBANCE
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
CULVERT#1
120
40
CULVERT#2
135
40
CULVERT #3
-WAIVER
236
0
REQUESTED
STREAM A SEWER
CROSSING
0
25
STREAM M CULVERT
EXTENSION
35
20
TOTAL
526
125
**Undeveloped Green Space to
Remain Undisturbed"
\ 1
\ f r 1!
(1 l
50' STREAM
B (TYPJ !/}1 I \1 \
PROPERTY BOUNDARY(TYP.)�
i
r ,r
PROPOSED INTERMITTENT STREAM
a�
A AND WETLAND XX IMPACT
SEE SHEET 11 -�
PROP. SANITARY SEWER
BE BORED (NO IMPACT)
/ r J
PROP. SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT(TYP.)
U
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
( ) - #1 STREAM J IMPACT
_ f SEE SHEETS 3 TO 6
/• PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
Vl l VIf\ tV „ 1 ! 4 / t\ ti., VI1'� BMP
/ EXTENSION STREAMM Ill\ f\ 5.../' f 1 l\ \ �11\II Iil`R 5
A IMPACT SEE SHEET 14 1J1 - V �l A Y� 1 / J " '} V��.�..�/1/l1 ��f!><#1 ' ( ,/tiff v r:
" P PROP. SANITARY SEWER
BAP #1 OUTFALL
! { � 1'\l\\III ` f- 5 EASEMENT (TYP )
.BMP#3 r; 50'STREAM
^ 4
BUFFER (TYP)
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
r
(TYP.)
\
\ 4
--ef
r 1}OI��c
�1111II
1!
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
T-�
50' STREAM i
.,. ��_ ���,BMP #20UTFALL - ".__
PROP. SANITARY SEWER CROSSING -%Vj �_ \\\ - ..,\\+ .-- r —
\ TEMPORARY IMPACT, SEE SHEET 13,^ \{"11r r j 1 t t \ +� \} �\ PROP. SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED ROAD CROSSING
_ #2 STREAM M IMPACT
F
/" "\1� TO BE BORED (NO IMPACT)
SEE SHEETS 7 TO 10
PROPOSED WETLAND P
IMPACT SEE SHEET 12
LENT ARO
v \ i
\ c
_C HWY 150
w / \
- I 800 0 800 1600
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants SCALE: 1" = 800'
D
1213 W. MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE"
CHARLOTTE, NO 28
(g7043345398
(170433 78
W W W.WKUCK ON.COM
NCLICENSENO.F-0 74
fn
Lu
N W
Z W 0 j
F— Co
7
Qfn N F
U Q Z
O t w 0 Z
OO=LLlF J r fL
z og OJ Lu
F
Q fn
= J
(t (t
Q ZELI
U U J
n JN W
O
a o
PRW. MGR.: MR
DESIGN BY: KWR
DRAWN BY: JJL
PROI. DATE: SEP 2020
DRAWING NUMBER:
2OF14
WKD PROD. NO.'.
2020026300CL
Figure 24

APPROXIMATE MAP
Wetland G
1 is - (-0.015 acres) 11
�
�( }� W0.015etland H _
(-
tom: -. f �n :� — " �~ �• �
Wetland I
!I 1-0.015 acres) _
Perennial Stream L��-
(-900 L.F., 0.25 acres)
Perennial Stream J �!'` f -
L.F., 1.7
I' •ter
(-5000 acres)
Perennial Stream K
(-100 L.F., 0.03 acres)
r, f
y..-.._ 22 17
Stream
Form
Wetland U (-0.03 ac.)
(DP4) 15
r
Wetland
. , .. r. Jo
_
Upland Dat Form (DP2a
Wetland X
fit •__•
Intermittent Stream W '- _
L.F., 0.03 j
Wetland Data (-300 acres)
j� I 1 44 1
(-0.58 acres) �— ����j `j Form (DP1) 14
Intermittent St ream IF 13 12'^
(-300 L.F., 0.03 acres)
Upland{
^�..
tDPa)
\ : :.. "`` In
Stream Q
�
180 L.F.,
....
Intermittent Stream AA�1` �Y -
(—
0.02 acres)
(-60 L.F., 0.006 acres)
Intermittent Stream A PP!!10
(-1300 L.F., 0.12 acres) `1�i 1
+; •.
Wetland XX V.
(-0.01 acres)
r
�9r,� Wetland S
(-0.003 acres)
6
stream
Wetland P
9
--�� (-0.025 acres)
Wetland BB
(-0.175 acres) - ,.r. -
Intermittent Stream R
(-95 L.F., 0.013 acres) r
r
���
Perennial:": ��
Perennial Stream B r
-110 L.F., 0.02 acres)_
Stream�z) I
(-5000 L.F., s �_ - _ • i
1.72 acres) �F '�•. y �.� ���'
Wetland C
(-0.01 acres)
Perennials Wetland Z q
_ Stream N (-0.02 acres) r 1
� • ; .....,.;. _.:.
¢
' (-100 L.F., 0.02 , Intermittent Stream O
acres)
'i
'y
(-350 L.F., 0.03 acres) Wetland Y �!
(-0.01 acres)
0 375 750 1,500
See Inset
ti' V•1
Feet
LEGEND
Tributary
® Wetland
Photo location and direction
LOCATION
Lat: 35.57236 2N
Long:-81.05660 2W
Update based on USACE field verification
Q Project boundary study limits
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
(07110119)
FIGURE NO.
Acres:
+I-405
SHANNON WOODS
Catawba County, NC
Drawn by: Reviewed by:
PG
JAL, P1K -SR
25
Prepared For.
LENNAR CAROL, NAS, LLC _
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd
Date:
05120/19
Revised
APPROXIMATE WETLAND MAP
USACE FIELD VERIFICATION UPDATE 07/10/19
07110119
For study purposes only: Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Charlotte, NC 28226

J Subject Reach for Waiver Study
-highly eroded; altered pattern & profile
-discontinuous bed and bank
+� -lacks obvious OHWM
f NCDEQ STREAM FORM A
FICSAM FORM A
ti `1
1LJFU5JILFILW AL
5WAI F
1
r 1 LECErJn
❑ Project boundary study limits
Stream :Z>
® Wetland -
0 60 1100 , 200 Landscape photoldirect on
Feet
FIGURE NO. SHANNON WOODS
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
26 Catawba Co., NC DICK LSR
APPROXIMATE WETLAND MAP - INSET- DATE:
• WATERS OF THE U.S. 9/4/2020
• f EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
• SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION

PHOTO 1: Gully upslope of Intermittent Stream A (facing upslope).
PHOTO 2: Treefall at the origin of Intermittent Stream A (facing downslope).
Shannon Woods - Intermittent Stream A: Landscape Photographs
Catawba County, NC — Photos taken 03/12/19
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

PHOTO 3: Just below the origin of Intermittent Stream A (facing upslope).
PHOTO 4: Below the origin of Intermittent Stream A (facing downslope).
Shannon Woods - Intermittent Stream A: Landscape Photographs
Catawba County, NC — Photos taken 03/12/19
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rrndner, PLLC.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Shannon Woods 2. Date of evaluation: 090320
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: Daniel Kuefler - WEPG
5. County: Catawba 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Reed Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 2.5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ®No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
F, W
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F CD
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o Y
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y rC
❑1
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
rCU
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/a mph i pod/crayfish/sh ri mp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version
2.1
Stream Site Name Shannon Woods Date of Assessment
090320
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization
Daniel Kuefler - WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date:
090320 1 Evaluator: I Daniel Kuefler - WEPG
Easting:
-81.0616
Project:
Shannen Wood - Stream A (Waiver Reach)
Northing:
35.5664
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
21.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
12.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
2
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Baseflow likely moderate due to heavy rains on previous 2 days. Previous visits have suggested
baseflow is typically weak to absent. Soil based evidence of water table sporadic along reach
however sampling point was closer to Wetland XX. Hence, overall score could potentially range
between 16-22 along study reach under typical conditions.
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodoloqv for Identification
Daniel Kuefler - WEPG
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form 4PC039

a- J
i
O
Q
v
oC
22
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
SHANNON WOODS
Catawba County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28226
Jeff Levi
Biologist
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Field Evaluated. February, March 2019 & September 2020
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
October 22, 2020
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10. PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Shannon Woods Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Shannon Woods site is located east of Highway 16, north of Highway 150,
along Reed Creek, northwest of Denver, in Catawba county, North Carolina,
(Figure 1). It can be found on the Denver USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map
at a latitude of 35.5714 N and longitude of 81.0545 W (Figure 2). The site
consists of broad ridges with mixed hardwood — pine forest types and forested
slopes leading to alluvial forest along Reed Creek and its tributaries. Upland
areas along the broad ridges and upper slopes are disturbed with a dense
understory. A portion of the site along Highway 150 consists of commercial
businesses, a sports field, and agricultural fields with horse barns and homes.
The topography is moderately to steeply sloped with the elevation ranging from
approximately 800 to 920 feet.
Figure 1:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
1
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Shannon Woods Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2:
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/catawba.html was referenced to determine the potential occurrence of
Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for Catawba County, North
Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial
photographs were assembled and the site was field investigated in February and
March 2019, and September 2020.
2
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Shannon Woods Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Table 1: Threatened/Endangered/Protected Species listed for Lincoln
County
County: Catawba, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on December 3, 2018; September 18, 2020
Group
Name
Status
Flowering
Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
Threatened
Plants
naniflora
Flowering
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
Endangered
Plants
schweinitzii)
Mammals
Northern lonq-eared bat (Myotis
Threatened
septentrionalis)
Birds
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act
Reptiles
Bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii)
Similarity of Appearance
(Threatened)
Two plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Catawba County:
• Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) listed as Federally
Threatened, is typically found in open forests on acidic soils along bluffs
and adjacent slopes, and in wet to mesic areas along streams and their
adjacent slopes. Many of the remaining populations are very small for this
NC/SC upper piedmont endemic.
• Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
WEPG 3
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Shannon Woods Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Catawba County:
• Northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened, roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in
crevices of both live and dead trees during summer months. Males and
non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and
mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and
sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and
mines, called hibernacula.
• Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabit forested areas near large
bodies of open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers
where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
roosting.
• Bog Turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii), listed as Threatened due to
similarity of appearance, live in the mud, grass and sphagnum moss of
bogs, swamps, and marshy meadows. These wetlands are usually fed by
cool springs flowing slowly over the land, creating the wet, muddy soil
needed by the turtles.
RESULTS:
The site is primarily mixed pine -hardwood forest along ridges and upper slopes
with open canopy communities along Highway 150, Wobegone Trail, and
agriculture roads and field edges, including small powerline right-of-ways.
Alluvial forest with streams and wetlands exist within the valleys below broad
ridges. Species lists reflect the seasonality of the survey.
The mixed pine - hardwood forest has a canopy which includes Virginia pine
(Pinus virginiana), short -leaf pine (P. echinata), loblolly pine (P. taeda), yellow
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Quercus alba), chestnut oak (Q.
montana), red oak (Q. rubra), hickory (Carya spp.), red maple (Acer rubrum),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and American beech (Fagus grandifolia) in
less pine dominated areas along slopes. The subcanopy supports water oak (Q.
nigra), black cherry (Prunus serotina), American holly (Ilex opaca), sourwood
(Oxydendrum arboretum), transgressives, and eastern red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana). Shrubs Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and vaccinium
(Vaccinium sp.). The sparse herb layer consists of Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), running cedar (Diphasiastrum digitatum), cranefly orchid
(Tipularia discolor), variable leaf heartleaf (Hexastylis heterophylla), sphagnum
WEPG 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Shannon Woods Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
(Sphagnum sp.), and spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata). Vines include
greenbrier (Smilax sp.) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
The alluvial forest has a canopy that supports American sycamore (P/atanus
occidentalis), red maple, sweetgum, yellow poplar, and loblolly pine. The
subcanopy includes black willow (Salix nigra), American holly, eastern red cedar,
paw paw (Asimina triloba) and transgressives. Shrubs include Chinese privet,
multiflora rose (Rosa mu/tif/ora), and strawberry bush (Euonymus sp.). The
sparse herb layer includes wild onion, Nepalese browntop (Microstegium
Vimineum), chickweed (Stellaria sp.), and Christmas fern. Vines include poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese honeysuckle, and greenbrier.
The roadside edges, field edges, and the small powerline right-of-ways do not
have a traditional canopy as it is managed by mowing and clearing of woody
species. The subcanopy from the adjacent woodlands include Virginia pine,
loblolly pine, sweetgum, oak (Quercus sp.), American holly, black cherry, red
maple, paw paGIS, and eastern red cedar. Shrubs include Chinese privet,
sumac (Rhus sp.), groundsel tree (Baccharis halimifolia), and blackberry (Rubus
sp.). Herbs include goldenrod (Solidago spp.), dog fennel (Eupatorium
capillifolium), American burnweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), bush clover
(Lespedeza sp.), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), ragwort (Packera sp.),
assorted grasses, chickweed (Stellaria sp.), St. Johns wort (Hypericum sp.),
evening primrose (Oenothera biennis), aster (Aster sp.), burdock (Arctium sp.),
yellow crownbeard (Verbesina occidentalis), beggars ticks (Bidens sp.), bluets
(Houstonia sp.), whorled Ioosestrife (Lysimachia quadrifolia), Brazilian vervain
(Verbena brasiliensis), pokeweed (Phyto/acca americans), daffodil (Narcissus
sp.), periwinkle (Vinca sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), rabbit tobacco
(Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium), dock (Rumex sp.), ebony spleenwort
(Asp/enium p/atyneuron), and crane -fly orchid. Vines include Japanese
honeysuckle and greenbrier.
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitat for dwarf -flowered heartleaf along wooded ridges and
slopes was closely examined. A population of heartleaf exists along the
upper slopes of the larger streams on -site. Flowering individuals were
observed and a positive identification as Hexastylis heterophylla was
made using morphological characteristics unique to this species. No
individuals of H. nanif/ora were observed.
• All potential habitats for Schweinitiz's sunflower along the power line right-
of-ways, roadside and field edges were closely examined. No individuals
of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed.
WEPG 5
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Shannon Woods Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
• Comparing our site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 or section 9 of the Endangered Species Act for the
northern long eared bat.
• There is no preferred habitat for bald eagles on the site. No bald eagles
were sighted during the survey nor were any nests or nesting activity
observed.
• The wetland/stream complexes and other wetland areas were examined
for the presence of bog turtles. No individuals were observed during the
survey nor would any be expected on -site.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the results of the field evaluation the review of available data, we see
no potential for a `Take' to occur to any of the protected species discussed within
this report. WEPG did not identify any protected species occurring on the subject
property. No further investigation of the presence of protected species on this
site is recommended at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeff Levi
Biologist
October 22, 2020
3
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

c�
U
Cultural
Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
October 12, 2020
Mr. David Nelson
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425
Charlotte, North Carolina 28226
Subject: Professional Opinion Regarding Potential Project Effects on a Historic Mill
Property (Site 2) Located Within the Shannon Woods Development Tract
Catawba County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 18-678-009
Dear Mr. Nelson:
During the periods of March 19 through 21, April 8 through 15, and April 25 through 26, 2019, R.S.
Webb & Associates (RSWA) conducted a cultural resources literature search and field
reconnaissance for the 405-acre Shannon Woods development tract in Catawba County, North
Carolina. A historic mill site was recorded straddling the north fork of Reed Creek in the west
central part of the development tract and it is RSWA's opinion that this archeological resource is
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion D (archeology) ("Flagged Limits
of Mill Site" on attached development plan).
Based on RSWA's flagging of the Site 2 boundaries, Lennar Carolinas established limits of
disturbance such that Site 2 will not be impacted by proposed project -related disturbances, and with
the intention of long-term preservation of this site. Based on the attached development plan, it is
RSWA's opinion that Site 2 will not be adversely impacted by project related activities. To reduce
the likelihood of inadvertent damage to Site 2 during construction, it is recommended that brightly
colored barrier fencing (e.g., "tree save") be established 10 feet outside RSWA's Site 2 boundaries.
Once construction is complete, this barrier fencing can be removed.
Mr. Nelson, we appreciate the opportunity to work with Lennar Carolina on this project. If you have
any questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB & ASSOCIATES
A %6 � rl
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachment: Shannon Woods Development Plan

PROPOSED STREAM
DISTURBANCE
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
CULVERT is,
120
40
CULVERT#2
135
40
TOTAL
255
80
e
NOTE
1. PROJECT MAXIMUM PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS. 60%
1
'
"•
�l. I
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
1
Y
SIMP "
J
-¢ �� = 1fy., •,� PROP SANITARY SEWER; -
PROPERTI'BOUNDARY P-•'Er�l'� EASEMENT TYP {TY } -BMP ' { 1 BAiP
✓S9
BMP :"% #11 r.:.. J .:,.�• - ~•'s
C
_r 45
R1• OP SANITARY SEWER , - "lrs • �' 'f
TO BE BORED (NO rMPAC:I •
BMI
c;"- ...1 'V4FfLANO iY8 �. • - >r>`
f - Py`4 Ir,11LL SITE
1�
Al
wip
.r -ifs' •'f• �` '.'.-•�• 'tr.'�.•�'..�/;: sW
PROPOSED INTERMITTENT STREAM if [ f -'°?•9 _
A AND WETLAND XX IMPACT y .�,I r ..•tia:: - .�.
�. .. .r� .. PROPQSED ROAD CROSSING
- H1 STREAM J IMPACT L ,
/•:. �3.�-lS�i:� .. 7I ,.. 'ti.� PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
ff �� s11L1
!� I i f!!lI NI IlI I, fF1 - (TYR)
PROP. SANITARY SEVQER Vry
. EASEMENT (TYP ) •�` - __ -
I � - � � • [ � BMP r~� t '� ia� r:�-- � ter'.
BMP
_ PROP SANITARY SEWER l - PROPC6ED ROAD CROSSING
I - PROP SANITARY SEWER _ M2 STREAM N IMPACT
-CROSSING [fEMPCRARY IMPACT] I _ TO BE BORED (NO IMPACT} !
PRCPO,_ED WETI-AND - I
IMPACT
LENNAR titi
WK DICKSON
soo 0 800 soo
i
community infrastructure consultants SCALE. 1'' - 8004
yy--.
�61C149dIV
�zlaw Nac�HEAa sT REET
SUfFE 3X
CWFILOITE• W 2l
Ih7049945996
fIl]OQ-39400]6
VMNJ.W GKSON MM
6}^ LICQSE NO i W74
N
Vl �
ZW
k=
2 8H
p V
y a W g Z
0 L­
J
Y O J
a
N ZUC=]
W p
m
'FI]J M : 16Nq
3ESICiN8,• i0.YX
]RAM'N 8, J1L
Fk5j �QA
0RAAWM NUMBER
2 OF 2
vivo 15 i No..
2020026WOCL

EN
Approvals /
Authorizations

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01016 County: Catawba U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Denver
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Zachary Ducey
Address:
6701 Carmel Road, Ste. 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number:
980-259-3000
E-mail:
zacharv.ducevna,lennar.com
Size (acres)
405 Nearest Town Denver
Nearest Waterway
Reed Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC
03050101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.5714
Longitude:-81.0545
Location description: The review area is located 1000 feet Northeast of the intersection of Hwy 150 and Hawks Nest Dr. in
Catawba County. PIN(s): 368611764118, 368612765273, 368612766364, 368612768534, 368612860666, 368612872371,
368612865522.369605081071.36905082126.368704906578.369717001165.36808997482.369605090747.368611661830.
368611669952,368602770808,368602783188,368602782402,368704800340.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 5/20/2019 (Revised
07/10/2019). Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2019-01016
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Catherine M. Janiczak at 704-510-1438 or
C atherine.M.Janiczak(au sace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 2/25/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

SAW-2019-01016 Corps Regulatory Official: a.4
Date of JD: 2/25/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2019-01016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: WEPG
Leonard S. Rindner
Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 704-904-2277
E-mail: len.rindner(&wetlands-enj!.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Zachary Ducey File Number: SAW-2019-01016
Date: 2/25/2020
Attached
is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Admilstrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION Jbr REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMITJM
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1 OM15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 2/25/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Zachary Ducey, 6701 Carmel
Road, Ste. 425,Charlotte, NC 28226
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Shannon Woods PJD, SAW-2019-
01016
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located 1000 feet
Northeast of the intersection of Hwy 150 and Hawks Nest Dr. in Catawba County. PIN(s): 368611764118,
368612765273, 368612766364, 368612768534, 368612860666, 368612872371, 368612865522, 369605081071,
36905082126,368704906578,369717001165,36808997482,369605090747,368611661830,368611669952,
368602770808,368602783188,368602782402,368704800340.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Catawba City: Denver
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.5714 Longitude:-81.0545
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Reed Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 07/10/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
'may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Wetland BB
35.56821
-81.05384
0.175 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland X
35.57228
-81.05814
0.58 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland G
35.57584
-81.05954
0.015 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland H
35.57567
-81.05976
0.015 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland 1
35.57557
-81.05992
0.015 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland U
35.57283
-81.05707
0.03 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland V
35.57271
-81.0568
0.02 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404

Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
'may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Wetland P
35.56924
-81.0513
0.025 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland 5
35.56886
-81.05135
0.003 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland C
35.56628
-81.05735
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland Z
35.5643
-81.06037
0.02 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland Y
35.56407
-81.06074
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Wetland XX
35.56693
-81.0618
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
Intermittent
35.56693
-81.06178
1300 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream A
Intermittent
35.56561
-81.05894
60 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream AA
Intermittent
35.57145
-81.05841
300 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream E
Intermittent
35.57035
-81.05033
180 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream Q
Intermittent
35.56884
-81.05137
95 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream R
Intermittent
35.56346
-81.06041
350 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream O
Intermittent
35.57203
-81.05774
300 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream W
Perennial
35.56291
-81.06392
100 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream N
Perennial
35.56323
-81.06397
5000 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream M
Perennial
35.57597
-81.06058
900 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream L
Perennial
35.57385
-81.06248
5000 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream J
Perennial
35.57328
-81.06374
100 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream K

Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
degrees)
degrees)
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non -
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Perennial
35.56629
-81.05646
110 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
Stream B
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AID for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 1 (Dated 05/20/2019 [Revised 07/10/2019])_
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Denver NC Quadrangle (1993)_
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Catawba County (1975)_
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Shannon Woods -NWT map_052019_
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 3 (Dated 05/20/2019)
or ®Other (Name & Date): Photopages (Dated 01/30/2019 & 05/14/2019)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of R latory
staff member completing PJD
2/25/2020
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

APPROXIMATE MAP
Wetland )
(-0.015 acres) 11
} Wetland H
(-0.015 acres)
Wetland I
!I (-0.015 acres) ,
Perennial Stream L�d
(-900 L.F., 0.25 acres) ,
= -
1p
Perennial Stream J
(-5000 L.F., 1.7 acres)�`
Perennial Stream K 21 de 19
(-100 L.F., 0.03 acres) r, f
y..-.._ 22
Wetland U (-0.03 ac.)
Stream 16'
Form
(DPa) 15 Wetland V (-0.02 ac.)
a� s'
Upland
Form (DP2a Intermittent Stream W '- _
Wetland X Wetland Data (-300 L.F., 0.03 acres) j
,
(-0.58 acres) Form (DPl) 14 `
Intermittent StreamE
(-300 L.F., 0.03 acres)
DDatad •{ ^�.. \�::.. "`` Intermittent
Stream Q
to (— 180 L.F.,
r
Intermittent Stream AA 0.02 acres � 1�� %-' f = )
(-60 L.F., 0.006 acres)
Intermittent Stream A !! to
(-1300 L.F., 0.12 acres) ��i 1 +; •.
Wetland XX�
(-0.01 acres)� Wetland S
7, �_ - (-0.003 acres)
Stream _ Wetland P
Form (-0.025 acres)
Wetland BB Intermittent Stream R
y (-95 L.F., 0.013 acres) r .
(-0.175 acres) - : - •�_
71
Perennial Stream B ram.
(-110 L.F., 0.02 acres
Perennial )
Stream M - --
,1. /
(-5000 L.F., s �` _ - `• , - ]
A '+1
' Wetland C ' E
(-0.01 acres)
3 0
Perennials " Wetland Z t
Stream N _ (-0.02 acres) �•i _
(-100 L.F., 0.02 Intermittent Stream O 'y
acres) (-350 L.F., 0.03 acres),` ; Wetland Y
(-0.01 acres)
0 375 750 1,500
Feet
LEGEND
111 Tributary LOCATION
® Wetland Lat: 35.57236 2N
Photo location and direction Long:-81.05660 2W Update based on USACE field verification
Q Project boundary study limits HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba) (07110119)
Acres: SHANNON WOODS Drawn by: Reviewed by:
FIGURE NO. +/-405
Catawba County, NC JAL, P1K -SR
1 Date: APPROXIMATE WETLAND MAP Prepared For.
05120/19 LENNAR CAROL, NAS, LLC _
Revised USACE FIELD VERIFICATION UPDATE 07/10/19 11230 Carmel Commons Blvd
07110119 For study purposes only: Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28226