Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820077_Inspection_20200707 t3' 7 7 ision of Water Resources 0 atW: 1 Y Facili Number L. - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ._ a- '.',W ;,j'.: 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: �m lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access. Date of Visit: I z-ist2 p rArrival Time: !.1,01 p Departure Time:eas County:S rSts N Region:. ''Ay Farm Name: 01 c4- A 6 Ll`-t &lot &1 d-1 D1.( Owner Email: Owner Name: I✓'b t .k- I4V•e-ft e4:5 rtettt t-,LL Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: A-J t-rovi Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: 6 Integrator: 016-- ' Certified Operator: ke \ \e r rr'c9 / Certification Number: Z6 0 2.-AB Back-up Operator: t( Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: :.Design :Current , ; _, Design Current ,Design Current Swine ,,,,1,- , ' a ace hPo . Wet Poultry' Ca aci hPo ; Cattle ;Capacity:-,ty: Pop- Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer ' Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Z Ejga �kA0,6. ` Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D r, Poul Ca 1 aci Po"s ': Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker ,V Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow Other ' ' •Turke Poults Other El Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®filo ❑ NA El NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ([6A ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DI A ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LKIA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes go ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: 6 2 - 7-7 Date of Inspection: 'S`/_iuly wz7 Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 3o itt /--Lf bej itt,ei14/ mri 2- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 01 1 ) 2,5 ,� 3 Z 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ez ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Iri4o 0 NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 11114o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): C 8 `H g&- 13. Soil Type(s): �Gt t� 1��/ 4 -' 81 , i-o i/ L 0-1. 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EcNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ofNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: h 2, 77 Date of Inspection: 1,:i�(7 7� 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings ofof facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). / Cidct tc! (10-• C—M" g(4�7.G & 't' 3j /ZJ /S--/l ill w L��r��►. I.�ce �4' 1-0-2 /,7, qope WO' 14t 1 I i° --/ s — 1` g 2:97, Pc tl .Z 17 (17 c To lOst,tl i b-(c- 1 `f LP" �a c-eitt CR° 13 - s i Reviewer/Inspector Name: j � /1001/1,• y Phone:WC -1-B 6 '3 3 3 `f .. n 'U Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L/' Date: r J 'y Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015