820067_Inspection_20200818

WI ►le 40 G- La (j 1J
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number , - , 7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation' 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint, 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1(5 'ad'20Arrival Time:MIME Departure Time: 7P5,5 + County: 041)59►v Region: -174-Y
Farm Name: = Pc' Chop Pt'
Owner Email:
Owner Name: tIZ:ty 071-D(re„.. . ✓ot�� �(,�' Phone: •
Mailing Address: '
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: sty ie-1M d4 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: i i F cr_ vt' i1c
Certified Operator: Certification Number: p
1 I� ""7
Back-up Operator: • Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. - Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _ _ _Layer- - Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 2.-CAV Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7 g5 3 6 ; 6-- _ _Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean emco ZO 1 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Zoo 7_0 Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars ' Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts -
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Ntr-❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ' ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No El-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) '❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ; ❑ Yes ❑ No D<A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [I 1 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 -2/4/201 S Continued

Facility Number: g 2., - („-7 Date of Inspection: ,8 4176- 20.4.)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes © ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ Norte ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Fiktitj\t1 `S O'L) •
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): -
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ e- ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes U''" ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1-1,1>I" ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E-1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 6t-t) .4u4( S'C 0
13. Soil Type(s): Gi.3 a
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 11. o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 12 l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes D'I'To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections -❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? .❑ Yes Q1To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: gz - L-7 Date of Inspection: l e gv 6-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes alto ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E T5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0,1)do ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 111-1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®,..wo",- ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ca,( uvA4 6-
qZ
( E Kove, tj 0 0
t.rc 'e-%-l"c "
Flo o - L .
� 5 o0t e,
\kg
(r,L( to--3 0s -- < I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i L� 0 al Phone:(V' t3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ikrDate: +`) '(' kpotO
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2615