820055_Inspection_20200828

►v�� `zsS 1.4.V 7`-k) L)
®Division of Water Resources
Facility Number e - fGC 5 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: •Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f4L z. 0 Arrival Time: 20 l7 Departure Time: J pr SO f' County: 111 Ps NA) Region: ,/4'Z
Farm Name: . 4( L tit, F--4A44 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1-9 4,4;ry1t CIG -k licM1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C if 1.S C' h
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1, Integrator: ' -7 S ,i
Certified Operator: C`Gdii' 1
1'11 Geb Certification Number: itrCaS
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: . Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer - Dairy Cow
•
Wean to Feeder I 0 Jb L'l'7Z g Non-Layer Dairy Calf .:
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers• Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lal ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other::
a. Was the conveyance man-made? - ❑ Yes ❑ No ® A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify-DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El-N/A El NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑.NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? .
Page 1 of 3- • 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: C, `Z,- ©65'S Date of Inspection:Z'4tV(3`ZO2
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 0 • (� aL1 a-O
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structure's observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA, ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ®gym ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [i] 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C E S&-O p C a).3
13. Soil Type(s): 7ArD
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes J ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes. a1‘❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes l ❑ NA 0 NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design. El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ado ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e.,,- SS Date of Inspection: 2e 2t7 �l
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes UZI ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ To ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes A •o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CAA tip 6-2,n S-1 I sc` '7e-'& ,e4/ 0,-40- 7pr
•&‘14-&-i3 9 t
ei AsAp to eti/Qfrh P•el/
Pu,v-“--z. 0)(-- te.W1'4/(4115'5'1 1 (
�bLs CGC�- Ktty. L.4 w 643
C 11 CUu" 3 og-- 6 51'
Reviewer/Inspector Name: G I 0 Phone: c•o-- S'� °) 9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ® Date: Cg 1)06-7v7-0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015