20100518 Ver 1_Application_20100701

1 ® ®51
FwnrF9oc
ONii? ,
8U ?I oZpr
/p
srR
RA?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Forth Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notifica 'on C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
I a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. / -9 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1 h. I s the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
:!. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Belhaven Sidewalk Project Pipe Installation
WBS Element Number 3602.3.02
2:b. County: Beaufort
e:c. Nearest municipality / town: Belhaven
2:d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: WBS 3602.3.02 Project Number ER-2971 Federal Aid N
1 umber STP-OOOS(424)
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. WA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. F ax no.: 252-830-3341
3 h. E mail address: jbjohnson@ncdotgov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

4a. Applicant is. ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.. 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)

5a. Name: NIA
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
55c. Street address:
5? 1. City, state, zip:

5ee. Telephone no.:
5-f. Fax no.:
51g. Email address:

Page 2 of 10
i
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
i
1. Property Identification
ta. Property identificat on no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Belhaven
Sidewalk Project Pipe Installation in Un-
Tributary of Shoemaker Creek
Named
Latitude: N 35.552613 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 76.626007
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: N/A acres
Z. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Un-Named Tributary of Shoemaker Creek, a Tributary of
proposed project: the Pamlico River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. SC;NSW 29-34-34-6 co
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico Pamlico 03020104
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
US 264 By-Pass, Belhaven Sidewalk Project Commercial and Residential Properties Dominate the Landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1051 Square Feet (0.02 Acres) of 404 Wetland Impacts
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Proposed Pipe Installation under Proposed Sidewalk Project
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Belhaven Sidewalk Project Entails 2,380 Linear Feet of Proposed 5'; Wide Sidewalk- Excavators,Dump Trucks,Back
Hoes,Motor Graders,and Concrete Trucks will be used for the Construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: William Wescott Flagged Wetlands in 2008
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): William Wescott, PWS Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
March,2008
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version .
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
E -1 Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary

W1 EDP[] T
Fill Bottomland ? Yes ® Corps
Eft Sq. Ft.
Hardwood forest ® No ® DWQ
W2 ® P ? T Fill Bottomland ? Yes ® Corps 410 Sq. Ft
Hardwood Forest ® No ® DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
21g. Total wetland impacts 1051 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: 1051 Sq. Ft. (0.02 Acres) 404 Welland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3ia. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 ® P El T
Pipe Installation Un-Named
Tributary of ® PER

?INT ® Corps

®DWQ
5"
20'
Shoemaker Creek
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S:3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 El P El T El PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
[:1 P [:1 T El PER ? Corps
l ? INT ? DWQ .
39. Total stream and tributary impacts 20 LF
3i! Comments: 20 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1:3 December 10, 2008 Version .
4; Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number-
Permanent (P)
or Temporary 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5j Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
51: Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5Y,. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
I below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
61a.
? ® Neuse El Tar-Pamlico
? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? El Catawba El Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?

81 ®P ? T Fill and
Pipe Un-Named Tributary of ? Yes
545 Sq. Ft.
96 Sq
Ft

Installation Shoemaker Creek No
.
.

B2 ®P ? T Fill and
Pipe Un-Named Tributary of ? Yes
410 Sq. Ft.
0 Sq
Ft

Installation Shoemaker Creek ® No .
.
63 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h..Total buffer impacts 955 Sq. Ft. 96 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments: Buffer Zone 1 Impacts 955 Sq. ft. 0.02 Acres Buffer Zone 2 Impacts 96 Sq. Ft. 0.002 Acres
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.. Avoidance and Minimization
Zia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent feasible to accommodate the proposed sidewalk and pipe
installation.
1h. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway shoulder to operate construction equipment; this will minimize the disturbance in the wetland during
construction.
2, Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
23. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? " DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version "
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In4ieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
6a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
I a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ®Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
i
1b
. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Stormwater will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering ® Yes ? No
into wetlands. Silt fences will be installed on the project.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A RoadwayBridge Project %
2b . Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering into wetlands. Silt fences will be installed on the
project.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemmenfs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stonnwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HOW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5.1 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
I Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
?Yes ? No
5bI. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version -
F. Supplementary Information
11. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federallstate) land?
1b . If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Welland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
21b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
T. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3;a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4:a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5: Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
i
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
? Yes ® No
habitat.
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
?
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?

On-Site Inspection and North Carolina Natural Heritage Foundation Data
i
5.' Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
On-Site Inspection with William Wescott and Stephen Lane
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
81). If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Pipe designed to no-rise standards
8c:. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson f June 23, 2010
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name pli nt/A nrs Signature Date
(Agent's signature' slid q if n uthor¢ation letter from the applicant
'
is
ided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version -
i
Project Tracking No. (Inferwl UseJ
10-05-0017
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: ER-2971
WBS No: 3602.3.02
F.A. No: STP-OOOS(424)
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
County: Beaufort
Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
Funding: ? State ® Federal
® Yes ? No Permit Type: Nationwide
Project Description: The project consists of approximately 2380 linear feet of 5-root wide concrete
sidewalk along US264 Bypass from US264 Business (Main Street) to the shopping center. The total
project length is 0.45 miles and the improvements will occur within the existing right-of-way.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Thursday,
May 27, 2010. No previously recorded archaeological sites were contained within the presently defined
APE/existing NCDOT right-of-way or adjacent to the general project improvement areas. A review of
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed archaeological properties was completed which
identified no resources within the immediate project area; the Belhaven City Hall located several blocks
east of the proposed improvement area is the lone NRHP property within the town. In addition,
topographic maps, historic maps, USDA soil survey maps (AbA, Ap), aerial photographs (Pamlico
County GIs website), and the Google street view map application were inspected/utilized by the cultural
resource specialist to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric
settlement within the project study area and to assess the level of modern, agricultural, hydrological, and
erosive disturbances within the APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Due to the lack of existing archaeological/historic resources within the currently defined APE, the
relatively diminutive nature of the urban improvement project & proposed construction impacts within
the existing right-of-way, and extensively disturbed Urban land complex soils encompassing the project
area, significant NRHP eligible cultural resources are unlikely to be contained within the project's
construction footprint/APE. No further archaeological work is recommended for this federally-funded
construction effort.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ® Photos ?Correspondence
? Photocopy of County Survey Notes
j FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
i
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
i
"No Survey Required"formfnrMinor Tv ponation Projectrar Qudiftedin the 2007 Progrmnmaic Agreement
NCDOTArdmeolov & Hatanc Amhueaum Group
' i
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date
"No Survey Requtred"form forMimor Tnmeponmlm Prgeaa m Qualified in the 1007 Progmmmuric Agreement. '
NCDOTAndureology & NutodcAmhtrecture Groups
Project Trackinngg No. (Internal Use)
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: ER-2971
WBS No: 3602.3.02
F.A. No. STP-OOOS(424)
Federal (1SACE) Permit Required?
County: Beaufort
Document
Funding: State X Federal
X Yes No Permit Type: NWP 14 or 3
Project Description: Construct approximately 2380 linear feet of five-foot-wide concrete sidewalk
along US 264 Bypass from US 264 Business (Main Street) to the Shopping Center, Belhaven. No
off-site detour.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description ofreview activities, results of review, and conclusions: HPO quad maps, historic
designations roster, and indexes reviewed on 9 June 2010 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Beaufort County current GIS mapping, aerial
photography, and tax information reveal only properties dating to the post-1960 era in the APE
(viewed 9 June 2010). Google Maps "Street View" confirms absence of historic
structures/landscapes in APE (viewed 9 June 2010).
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: APE centered on existing US 264 Bypass
and extends 200 feet to either side (NW and SE) of existing center line and at each project
terminus (NE and SW) to encompass existing/proposed ROW (100 feet) and 0.45-mile project
length. Within this area, county GIS/tax materials indicate buildings and structures constructed
mostly within the last thirty years, and available visuals support such dates. While not
comprehensive, architectural survey in Beaufort County has identified certain significant
properties, none of which are located in the project APE. No National Register-listed or -eligible
properties are present in the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached:
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED - Historic Structures
i / rN ( i IN
wv O
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date
"No Snrvry Required "form for Minor Transportation Projects as Q al yied in the 1009 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architec0ne Groups -
BELHAVEN SIDEWALK PROJECT
PROPOSED 2,380 LINEAR FEET OF 5' WIDE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG US 264 BY-PASS
FROM US 264 BUSINESS (Main Street) TO THE
SHOPPING CENTER
PROJECT NUMBER ER-2971
FEDERAL AID NUMBER: STP-000S (424)
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER: 3602.3.02
JUNE 23, 2010
All Planning documents have been completed including the Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Form
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal: Section 404(F)(1)(b) Exempt Activities-Maintenance of Transportation Structures.
State: Activities Deemed to Comply with Water Quality Standards.
Local: None
Federal USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 - Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687
Local: None
Proiect Description
The Belhaven Sidewalk Project involves 2,380 Linear Feet of 5' Wide Concrete Sidewalk along US 264
Bypass from US 264 Business (Main Street) to the Shopping Center. The Section of the Proposed sidewalk
and a Proposed 16' x 24" RCP Pipeline will be installed in an area that is 404 Wetlands as shown on the
Plan Sheets.. The total 404 Wetland Impacts are 1,051 Sq. ft. (0.02 Acres) This project does not require the
completion of a formal PCN but notification to the Corps is being provided to be included in their database.
This conveyance is shown on the Pantego and Belhaven USGS Quad Maps and Sheet Numbers 9 and 10 of
the Soil map taken from the Soil Survey of Beaufort County. The stream is an Un-Named Tributary of
Shoemaker Creek and the channel is 5 feet wide from bank top to bank top and drains a
Commercial/Residential Area. No federally protected species or historic resources are immediately
adjacent to this location.
In order to ensure compliance with best management practices, all attached General and Regional
Conditions associated with Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certification #3687 must be followed.
Keep demolition and construction debris out of the stream. Riprap will not be placed below the
plane of ordinary high water for stabilization. Excavation should be confined to the right of way,
and limited to the minimum amount required to excavate in high ground for the construction of the
new sidewalk and pipe installation. All excavated material should be removed from the site, placed
on existing spoil piles, or disposed of in farm fields. Any waste material disposed of off-site shall have
a reclamation plan.
All Erosion and Sedimentation measures and Maintenance Best Management Practices should be
implemented. I am forwarding a copy to Mr. Andy Blankenship in Roadside Environmental for his perusal
in E&S inspections. The project supervisor should always have this permit package, including the attached
General and Regional Conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certification
#3687 on-site during the sidewalk construction and pipe installation. The project supervisor should notify
me immediately if any questions or concerns should arise before and during construction.
Jay B. Johnson
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 2
[phone]
I
w
m
W<
w

O

?
U
Q?
r
?y

0

h

w

m z
W U h
w. m y
?F m y
Wm
<W W
a
y
y

3 IL y
N y
?
O
Z w U a
U
?I 0
a
m
x t9 h w c?
wl a Z y ?
n ,

N ry
O
ti
x II W 0. w
I
I 0
U I I; W
'
(w I
I
?

vj I
O
? I I
O '
it Z

U 1
'?
s I'
I Q

h ,I
I 0

W
,I
D

m
0 3<
N W O
U ml v; CD

W ?1
II ?
o II
(?J\ d °
-
p >
I n.
0 N J
LL
w
x
W
A ? W o -

I
m ?
w
a
I'
w,
a w Z
F

u
W O N

o a

O
a co z
w a O O
wl'
? a
W
3m

Q?Iw.
3 m
.

Z W
H
m
a 9< W
j

.
Z
W
F R•
.
93 f0
W ? K

Q Q
? X y~j. , On
Z?
w O O° on
Z ..

z
O
H °a
rc
O o
a n
N m
z .< N
K 'O
0
n
F N m n
m
220-
Fmm-?
? > m
aa0n
w n U
a z
Z w
J J
J
m >
< Z
U w
0
Z
m
n
N N LL
0 0
m w
N Z r
o ?
m
n
ie w is
m<?
3 ? w
2
0
3
O
0
m
N
m
m
n
0
z
O
J
z z
w O
J
W J Z
m F
< V - r
00 J n e
w < n w
< n n
m < < F F
f W J
Zea
0 < co m
U O m 0
w
U ?,
Q Wp
n LL Co O
ti ] Wr_:
rn a ?
Q• a
11
11
wl ?
> w?
LLJ V)
wI O
w LI a w
O
Z.
a' a
Cal
I
I
1
I'
I
I'
,I
II
I
,I
II
?I N
I\ X
W i ?
CO I LL
al O
w
H'^ .o
IL
VI
IC?
V Q'
Z
w
3
W
I
U
r4i
ti
Q
Q
I
r.

. I
O
J
J
Q
Z
Q-
N

W
O
cc
Cj-
?I
O
l>J J
Ll- Q
W (J-)
Z W
J
O ~
CO 6-
nJ
N
O QD
N
O
N
W
J
W
C2
Zt
I 1
UP?j'S

N

I?
Q CL-
J

?3
LU O
O
CL-
U ?
W
O

.
lJ
Q

W
0?
C,
0
Cl- Q?
c;

L-tJ
<<
1'
LLJ

LLJ
m

Z z

U l
W ,
> <
c
CL-
Q I I I I
W
? Z I I I
f? W I
Q ? ? I I I
Q O I
? v
??? I I II
III
O o III
?,j
U Q \\ W /II
U m W\\\ I I/ ?/
W \\\
I
LL,
QZ? ? \\\I I I
cc QD Z W; xN \?\
I ;\\ I
\\
? W
c
LL.
O O J O
I \\ ??+?e
CC \
Q
? .r I e o ?
I? Q ?ixeo I r?^ a?
LL-
0
5
LLJ
Q j z?oe / /
Q Oz III I I /
L1 P
I ?m I I ? I
Z ? I I
?WZ I VI ? I
x I
¢eof \\ I
cy
I ?
CC I I I
? N I W I I II
O W I
v? i I
O N ?o? I I

rn
Z z

Lki
Z
W
3
°I

Oe
e`
c?
nr
5
dF ego
?r(e?
Fi P?? JQ1
y' .s

a
?e

a?
e O
GJ?
Q d
??c5
L.
C7

v
?
Q
D CL-
?
Q

J ? Q

o
C

"' Q
v
i o

LLI
0

0
Q:
8

O
J
J
Z
N

Lti
(J)
O
Q-
v
Q-
Q s
? O
? W
j O
co Cl-
O
LLJ J
LL- Q
Q ?
LLJ ? U)
J ?
C) Ltj
CX3
N Z
r?^ I°v^
v l v 1
O
j
°v
0
j
GO
W
Z
J
N
O
rl?
C\j
Ci)
W
J

N
0
0
W
m
Z
Q
Q
Q?
? O
?v
cr-
rQr^D
uj v )
C
O 41
W Q?
? Q
O
Cl-
O ?LJ
O O J
Q O
~ ? O
LQ
v
L Z
J ?
LQ LQ
J ?
m
Q

?

N

W
m O
N
N
u
LIJ
Z
? v
0
z
w
i I
Lij
I
Z

Lli
I
?

I
?

V I

O
Q I

W \\
\\
? \\ I

W x N i \\ I
C) W \\

I
I
I I
II
I I
I. I
I ?? U h
?II
I ti III
W?
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
cr-
m I
.cyvo? I QeF--
Q
O+ oco ? ti?a?
K
Q .h
P
J Oe ??4O
ei I? I
Ce?
pp ea bJ?
ti
Ip
N W
'LQ
J cq
wl
z
W
CD
I
l
/I
I
I
i
I
II
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ?
1
I?
IW
I
1
I ?
I
e
ya
y
Gf e?0
J \ P`1i ya
?G
[r
N
CC)
,G
OJ9 0
3Nn b o°c 5 N
0 ?N
V
c
c
a
Q
4

e ?
Qe L t?
G a
icy
0
? m
L
Q ?
J Q
0
z
? z
N
0 o w
Q LL-
Ln z m
W
O
0
C 8
BELHAVEN SIDEWALK PROJECT BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROPOSED 2.380 LINEAR FEET OF 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG
US 264 BYPASS FROM US 264 BUSINESS (MAIN STREET) TO THE SHOPPING CENTER
PANTEGO AND BELHAVEN USGS QUAD MAPSAND SHEET NUMBERS 9 AND 10
OF THESOIL SURVEYOF BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER ER-2971 WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 3602.3.02
FIRM PANEL 7606 J FEDERAL AID NUMBER STP-000S(424)
MAPNUMBER 3720760600 J MAY21, 2010
z
t
+ '? r END PROJECT
# x? ?? -" } Y= 664494.8916
Y= 2706053.0072
-?? 6 .0 3 N35^-33'-09,,
y4 * et N35.552613 DEGREES
W 76.626007 DEGREES
4L N
WE
`*# BEGIN PROJECT `` ?"? *'?
r Y= 662703.7287
- +
X=2704251.8611
St W 76^-37'-56"
`F N 35.547811 DEGREES
W 76.632205 DEGREES '
1 inch = 500 feet _
0 262.5 525 1.050 1,575 2,100
Feet "
RELHAVEN SIDEWALK PROJECT BEA UFORT COUNTY
PROPOSED 2,380 LINEAL FEET OF 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKALONG
US 264 BYPASS FROM US 264 BUSINESS (MAIN STREET) TO THE SHOPPING CENTER
P.4NTEGOAND BELHAVEN USGS QIJAD M'APSAND SHEET NUMBERS 9AND 10
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF BE 4 UFORT COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER ER-2971
FIRM PANEL 7606 J
MAP NUMBER 3720760600 J
R

WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 3602.3.02
FEDERAL AID NUMBER STP OOOS(424)
MA Y 21, 2010
END PROJECT
Y= 664494.8916
h?
S?
PVC,

c
??od
BE'GINPROJECT
Y- 662 703.728 7
X= 2 704'51.8611
N35 ^-32'-52"
W 76 "-.37'-5`6"
N 35.547831 DEGREES
''' 76.63.12.4.1 05 DEGREES
Y 2706053.0072
N
W 76A -37'-34 "
N 3.5.5-52613 DEGREES
ff ` 76.626007 DEGR ES
N
w E
s
r?
a?
r

0 252.5 525
1 inch = 500 feet
1,050
1,575

2,100
= Feet
s1
k'r
BELHAVEN SIDEWALK PROJECT BEA UFOR T COUNTY
PROPOSED 2,380 LINEAR FEET OF 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKALONG
US 264 BYPASS FROM US 264 BUSINESS (MAIN STREET) TO THE SHOPPING CENTER
PANTEGO AND BELHAVEN USGS QUAD MAPSAND SHEET NUMBERS 9 AND 10
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF BEA UFORT COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER ER-2971 WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 3602.3.02
FIRM PANEL 7606 J FEDERAL AID NUMBER STP-000S(424)
MAP NUMBER 3720760600 J MA Y 21, 2010
4 F' r ?
a • _
• v N
a
Xp ?9 ,e4C I?,w ? , .
A
x'` ` ` ? ; - END PROJECT
` ??i*, "?.?? 0&
?M Y= 664494.8916
:?' Y= 2706053.0072 ,
- l N35 ^-33'-09" k ,
' of
W 76^ -37 -34„ kb?4 via
Ira N 35.552613 DEGREES
W 76.626007 DEGREES
+ ?. " } as R_ ";;/?, , • N
lily 4p,
a f c. , 4
110
?,.. - ?? x'90 ??,,. + ? •? '.? : ?? S
BEGIN PROJECT
` Y= 662703.7287 " ?f•?;
it } Y= 2704251.8611
X.
N 35^-32'-52"
tA t.
01 76A -37-56"
F` `rf
N35.547811 DEGREES
* .?
W 76.632205 DEGREES r?
7Aw
1 inch = 500 feet ? k ,r. olp . ?
0 262.5 525 1,050 1,575 2,100
Feet i ysf