HomeMy WebLinkAbout760050_Inspection_20201007 (2)Type of Visit: 9q Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U 'Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: y"X' Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: j (a �(� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: '�j — Ili C,
T
Mailing Address: S3Z5 W l l haryk3 D.1 Yl,f IqC yl d *
Region: V-49:b
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 121 lam-- W t I (QAIN,S Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
API
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ....�t No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
�[
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
PQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ()
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes JQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 22 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 f �_e (�" ;AUCk__
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? )q
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NJI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ` q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes F0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. 7�
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t ropriate box below. Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Anal si �� s 191 Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 �` 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: O
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
j� Yes
1❑]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Q0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[;k No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
(Q+No
l
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
]�
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
SON. is 40-f- y-to r (W^d-b)
. Lash- cct c� bra }, ems? IY�(%�a�P-, al I-A101 �,��� �o�b - PkS�-
f eCM vebvk �Ck IN
�rac�t�c.d ?
to c� �- c by uo Ckn
Cd1MW�e.✓CtUl � � �
comy^k-r•Cw G " t U% j r\�P
too lb I o c � . 0 � CVy raj VU lb CV, G.
%� ,SU e�i �Qv�l' Yp�-k- �►� �e n d\p,r eaS 01 S}� eCAYI
61 .mod of
Y t'N118pf— "ID4
kl` b �,OjS(k t
L o JO
L * DW� i1„=
Y.� ` n 6��n bar e���- -� r'rv��
Spnq�t arml z;S w4�set bu �- L)_W hihky N 1rCj-e_, f �Rf
� `f �
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Name: Of %e r Phone:�j—�� 6S
t cg�
r
Signature: Date: Q
21412015