760051_Inspection_20200904

Type of Visit: §0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: q L Arrival Time: 110 '. 9� Departure Time: County: pal j Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address
Facility Contact: 3amn IJ VIq VI Title:
Onsite Representative: '/
Certified Operator: I
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone: 3su - 3 $ Z. - Q�35
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Hwy Uu E m Ou iom , Plea5o'Y14 (�+ � � e V-d . Z m l �-1-v��rvl bn g rat n�-v i l I e Un
rafmzmi on
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

FaciliNumber: - Date of Inspection: 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes P�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W59
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): '�}
14
t�/w - -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? F
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
5rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
J�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r('f�(� f� A'Vt a P
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
UINA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP %Checklists Design Maps XLease Agreements ❑ Other:
I-' X
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis � Wade Transfers Xweather Code
Rainfall%StockingCrop Yield` n' ^^ �=~ �- T _ ___ ___ _ __ _ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectionsV'q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes R] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No A NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -I Date of Inspection: q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ro ❑NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yeso gNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
No
❑ Yes 9
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
[ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes X No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes b�`No
❑ NA ❑ NE
3 CJ c,� I Qa (h12
U i ISM I�►�Ip I QS w �-�'h P y� �a,
p
� ll�U-N� IYl
Mo i &f 'a Ve y1e,WVC co "OA on bAnnk, ft5ad t
U17111 10IZ511a 3hTm
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signa
Page 3 of 3
Ion & Ma
IFELVE11 & 111111111!, ffiur='� OR
"Win"'icanufts's ��MEF;7 C�
21412015