760008_Inspection_20200804 (2)

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4(Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: I County: Region: V v S I`C
Farm Name: �Q`�l e�,YyV� S Owner Email:
Owner Name: j� i r_ Phone:
Mailing Address: �C� U UkAA bc+V� /\ i `1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: by- ��Q�U e�✓1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
V
Integrator:
Certification Number: W I
Certification Number:
Latitude: �W t n
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
D �,1�
Longitude: �`"7l�
q � 3o_
❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[—]Yes M No
❑ Yes [� No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: dT k - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes `X No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 7Q
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
Crop Window""
,
""
12. Crop Type(s): &! j19e(t � ,yilu� T?�CV�- au , Corn arru n
13. Soil Type(s): `� —
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?, checti +hP :pp.�f, =-'� h
❑ Yes No
LPJ
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application � Weekly Freeboard ro Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
�ausfcrs
Weather Code
40 Rainfall Stocking � Crop Yield [ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
P
ge
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IV No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes M No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
C pUSrL \(._Sz-ed c d ? 1JJQS, Id�Ksbd bUfi rlun h Ccrv+nuQ Yede
ed� n
C v i a r. Cuutb>u� d 1 9113
olJ gun J\A K -e r�1 Ud �t Go f v -t YX 0-� V'C Vly-f-A M
O
�( 6V 6,L_1jUCe, �,)yA �0eu�C
C .kc)) SipeGnc;a,Q,� LudA U
yvw qun J00191.P, CSC Loe+. GAC.r-1 .
(dAj I \'\
II v
3I-I/a-o
-)Ir,I�-D
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
c Gh0, I �� i V� PhV'�► b 16 a1-10
Date: (4gD
21412015