20070245 Ver 3_Individual_20100825

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
p 1 MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20004
s's,_r y CAMP LEJEUNE, NC 28542-0004
IN REPLY REFER TO
5090.11.2
BEMD
AEG 19 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, 401 Section
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Mr. McMillan:
Enclosed is a permit modification request'a?or the MARSOC
Complex on Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune. The enclosure is
submitted for your review, approval and issuance of a Section
401 Water Quality Certification to authorize filling an
additional 0.218 acres of Section 404 jurisdictional wetlands
(459 feet of linear wetlands) at this project (DWQ Project
Number 2007-0245). A $240.00 processing fee for this
application is also included.
The point of contact for this project is Mr. Martin Korenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environment and Installations
Department, at telephone [phone] or email
[e-mail].
Sincerely, ?LS@I5;j?Lg
n ? -\ AUG " a 2010
u ` OENR • AW.ITEA QUALITY
OHN R. TOWN S ON M ILAK* AND STORURVER ORMM
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of the
Commanding Officer
Encl: 1. MARSOC PERMIT MODIFICATION AND RESOLUTION DOCUMENT, 2
AUGUST 2010 (4 copies w/ $240.00 fee)
Copy to: NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section, Attn: J. Steenhuis

MARSOC Permit Modification & Resolution Document
United States Marine Corps Base
(USAGE Action ID: 2007 286 067 / DWQ Project No. 2007 0245)
AUG 2 3 ZOfO
Prepared for: llRAKN
United States Marine Corps Base - Camp Lejeune
Jacksonville, North Carolina

•
Prepared by:
The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
Baltimore, Maryland
and
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
August 2, 2010
0
DRAFT MAK50C Modification/Kesolution Document
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 PERMIT MODIFICATION ............................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Impact Area EE ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Impact Area HH & PP .................................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Impact Area QQ ........................................................................................................................... 3
2.4 Impact Area D 1 ............................................................................................................................ 3
2.5 Impact Area N 1 ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.6 Impact Area P 1 ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.7 Permit Modification Impact Summary ........................................................................................ 4
3.0 AS-BUILT IMPACT SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 5
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION TIME LINE FOR AREAS OF CONCERN ....................................... 6
5.0 BAFFLE REMOVAL AND STREAM STABILIZATION ............................................................ 6
6.0 MITIGATION COMPONENT ........................................................................................................ 7
6.1 Mitigation Status Summary ......................................................................................................... 7
• 6.2 Proposed Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................................. 7
6.2.1. Additional Permanent Impact Mitigation ................................................................... 7
6.2.2. Temporary Impact Mitigation ..................................................................................... 7
6.2.2.1 Reach and Duration ..................................................................................... 8
6.2.2.2 Biological Characteristics ............................................................................ 8
6.2.2.3 Natural Sediment Loads within MARSOC Streams .................................... 9
6.3 Mitigation Summary .................................................................................................................... 10
7.0 MONITORING PROPOSAL ........................................................................................................... 10
7.1 Sedimentation Restoration ........................................................................................................... 10
7.2 North and South Mitigation Sites ................................................................................................ 10
7.3 Temporary Impact Areas Associated with Additional Impacts ................................................... 11
8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACT SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 12
9.0 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 13
•
Page TOC-i
MAK50C Permit modification & }zesolution Document

List of Tables
• Table No. Description Page
2-1 Permit Modification Impact Summary ................................................................................................ 5
3-1 Impact Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5
4-1 Corrective Action Time Line .............................................................................................................. 6
8-1 Cumulative Impact Summary .............................................................................................................. 12
Appendices
Appendix Description Page
A US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (9 October 2007) ............................................ i
B US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (16 October 2008) .......................................... ii
C Impact Area EE Details ............................................................................................................... iii
D Impact Area HH & PP Details .................................................................................................... iv
E Impact Area QQ Details .............................................................................................................. v
F Impact Area DI Details ............................................................................................................... vi
G Impact Area NI Details ............................................................................................................... vii
H Impact Area PI Details ............................................................................................................... viii
I Permitted Impacts Survey and Table ........................................................................................... ix
J NC EEP Receipt for Payment ............................................................................................. x
K US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (28 March 2008) .......................................... xi
L MARSOC Cantonment Project Area Wetland Type Exhibit ....................................................... xii
M Sedimentation Tracking Survey and Table ............................................................. xiii
N MARSOC's Natural Stream Photos ............................................................................................. xiv
•
Page TOC-ii
MAKSOC Permit Modification & Resolution Document SE-6i
0 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Southern Environmental Group, Inc (SEGi) and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (WT),
on behalf of the US Marine Corps Base - Camp Lejeune (herein referred to as the "Applicant"),
have prepared this correspondence pursuant to conversations which took place during the 4 February
2010 and 18 February 2010 meetings regarding the Marine Corps Special Operations Command
(MARSOC). The purpose of this document is to:
• formally request a modification to the existing DWQ Certification and Department of the
Army (DA) Individual Permit (IP), issued to the Applicant under DWQ #20070245 and
USACE Action ID No. 2007-00286-06;
• resolve non-compliance/enforcement issues; and
• provide an expected time line for stabilization of areas of concern to take place.
MARSOC was issued a provisional permit on 9 October 2007, which preliminarily authorized the
discharge of fill material into an estimated 12.5 acres (Ac.) of wetlands and 12,800 linear feet (LF)
of unnamed tributaries to Stone Bay, which abuts the New River, a navigable water of the U.S. (see
Appendix A). These calculations were based upon the best information available during the
preparation of the conceptual layout of the complex.
• During the permit process, it became necessary to separate the project into three phases: Phase I -
Headquarters; Phase II - Road Realignment; and Phase III - Y07-Y08 Development. Under these
three permits, more specifically the IP dated 16 October 2008, the Applicant was authorized to
permanently discharge fill into 4.36 Ac. of wetlands and 3,040 LF of tributaries (see Appendix B).
As a requirement of the special conditions of the previously mentioned authorizations, as well as to
resolve permit non-compliance matters that inadvertently took place during the construction process,
as-built surveys were prepared. The surveys revealed that only 4.11 Ac. of wetlands and 1,447 LF of
tributaries were permanently impacted. The differences were largely based upon misinterpretation of
wetland and stream information. Additionally, the as-built surveys identified the need for after-the-
fact (ATF) permitting of 0.22 Ac. of 404 jurisdictional wetlands. Cumulatively, wetland and
tributary impacts, including the 0.22 Ac. of ATF impacts, total 4.33 Ac. and 1,447 LF, respectively.
Although cumulatively the impacts are less than what were originally approved, impacts to riparian
wetlands exceeded the permitted allotment by 0.05 acres and perennial stream impacts were 90 LF
greater than permitted. Therefore, a modification of the authorizations is necessary to ensure
accurate accounting of all impacts associated with the MARSOC project.
It is the intent of this document to provide the information necessary to resolve all outstanding
concerns relating to wetlands at the MARSOC Complex. It is our sincere hope that, after reviewing
the information found within and attached to this document, the permit modification will be
authorized and a resolution letter can be issued.
•
Page 1
DRAFT MAR50C Modification/Resolution Document SEGO
2.0 PERMIT MODIFICATION
According to attachments to the Individual Permit, dated 16 October 2008, authorized permanent
impacts consisted of 165,548 SF (3.80 Ac.) of non-riparian wetland; 24,398 SF (0.56 Ac.) of riparian
wetland; 2,957 LF of intermittent stream; and 83 LF of perennial stream (please see Appendix B for
more details).
This packet provides documentation to support the requested modification to the IP, which consists of
the permanent fill of 9,499 SF (0.218 Ac.) and the temporary fill of 6,096 SF (0.139 Ac.) of section 404
jurisdictional wetlands. Please refer to Appendices B through G for plan and profile views and other
relevant information for each impact area. A brief summary for each area follows:
2.1 Impact Area EE (linear wetland / non riparian):
461 SF (0.011 Ac.) (154 LF) Permanent
This additional impact is necessary to ensure the operational integrity of the adjacent stormwater
basin 13 (please see Appendix C for details).
Impact area EE is an extension of Impact area DD, which was necessary to facilitate the
construction of Alignment 6. The wetland feature is depicted on the original grading plan.
However, it does not appear on the stormwater plan. Thus, it is anticipated that the impact was an
oversight during the original permit process. The impact is necessary to facilitate the slopes for
stormwater basin 13.
An alternative for restoring the feature consists of removing the existing fill and installing a
retaining wall on each side to ensure slope stability. Based on the linear footage of the impact, the
structures would need to extend 176 LF and be approximately 10 feet high. However, based on the
fact that the pond has been fully constructed, the installation of a retaining wall, directly adjacent
to the existing pond bank, creates a logistically complex construction scenario, which may
compromise the integrity of the pond. Thus, it is believed that restoration of the feature is not a
practicable alternative.
2.2 Impact Areas HH and PP (bottomland hardwood forest / riparian):
HH 3,134 SF (0.072 Ac.) Permanent
PP 3,702 SF (0.085 Ac.) Permanent
These additional impacts are necessary to provide sufficient foundation and expanse for
infrastructure associated with buildings E2 and E3 (please see Appendix D for details)
Although indicated as fill on the grading plan, these impacts were inadvertently left out of the
original submittal of the application and subsequent issued permits. Per the previously submitted
drawings, the buildings, required fire lane, 10" sanitary sewer and 24" stormwater lines required
the grading and proposed impacts. At this time, the slope is approximately 1.5:1, and erosion is an
ongoing issue. The proposed 3:1 slope is necessary to ensure adequate bank stabilization.
Page 2
MAK50C Permit Modification & Resolution Document 5E-61
While impacts could be minimized by incorporating a retaining wall, due to the Department of the
Defense (DoD) regulations, this is not a logistical alternative. According to the DoD - Anti-
terrorism Standards for New and Existing Buildings, utilization of a retaining wall in this area
would not meet the standard requirements and would contravene recommendations to eliminate
vantage points'. Therefore, the design, as proposed, is the most practicable alternative.
2.3 Impact Area QQ (hardwood flat / riparian wetland):
511 SF (0.012 Ac.) Permanent
5,163 SF (0.119 Ac.) Temporary
The impact is necessary to facilitate the construction of the aquatic facility (POOL Y08) and
associated infrastructure (please see Appendix E for details).
The incorporation of a gravel service road, which is necessary to provide access to the mechanical
room and backwash pit, extends the previously proposed footprint for the facility out
approximately 50'. This, in conjunction with increasing the slope off the service road to 6:1,
necessitates the impact to wetlands. As discussed previously, utilizing retaining walls to avoid or
minimize impacts to wetlands is not consistent with DoD anti-terrorism building standards.
•
Temporary impacts associated with this impact facilitated the implementation of approved
temporary sediment and erosion control measures. Once these measures have been removed, the
area will be restored to its original grade and contour and allowed to re-vegetate naturally.
2.4 Impact Area D1 (linear wetland / non-riparian):
1,206 SF (0.028 Ac.) (201 LF) Permanent
378 SF (0.009 Ac.) (63 LF) Temporary
The impact is necessary to facilitate an adequate slope extending from the Transient (F) building
pad to the grade at Alignment 3 (please see Appendix F for details).
As with impacts HH and PP, the building has already been constructed and the infrastructure
installed. Final grade of the building's foundation and footings require 3:1 slopes. Restoring the
feature would consist of increasing the ratio to 1:1, which is not suitable for bank stabilization.
Again, as with impacts HH and PP, utilization of a retaining wall in this area is not a practicable
alternative.
Temporary impacts associated with this impact facilitated the implementation of approved
temporary sediment and erosion control measures. Once these measures have been removed, the
area will be restored to its original grade and contour and allowed to re-vegetate naturally.
•
United States Dept. of Defense. Unified Facilities Criteria 04-010-01. DoD Minimum Anti-terrorism Standards for
Buildings (October 8, 2003 Including Change 1, January 22, 2001), B-3.2.1 and C-1.3.
Page 3
DRAFT MAK50C Modification/Kesolution Document jEGi
2.5 Impact Area N1 (linear wetland / non-riparian):
• 133 SF (0.003 Ac.) (45 LF) Permanent
Impact Area N1 is an extension of the previously approved Impact Area M, which was necessary
to facilitate the installation of Alignment 3 and stormwater pond 11 (please see Appendix G for
details).
Currently the banks of the pond and roadside are at 2:1. However, this ratio has proven to be
inadequate for slope stabilization. In addition, the roadside ditch manages a significant amount of
stormwater runoff, which is generated from Alignment 3 and Impact Area M. Taking this
information into consideration, measures to ensure slope stabilization and stormwater management
controls have been incorporated into the design.
During the initial discussions on how to address both slope stabilization and water velocities
within the channel, it was thought that a drop inlet, weir structure, and rip-rap plunge pool could be
installed within the area where the existing temporary sediment trap is currently located. However,
once the slopes were extended out to 3:1, this became impossible. Therefore, a rip-rap channel has
been incorporated into the grading plan to provide stable banks and control water velocities.
These measures should ensure adequate stabilization of the pond's banks, diminish the occurrence
of channel erosion, and promote the hydrologic integrity of the system downstream of the impact,
rendering this design as the most practicable alternative.
• 2.6 Impact Area P1 (linear wetland / non-riparian):
352 SF (0.008 Ac.) (59 LF) Permanent
555 SF (0.009 Ac.) (93 LF) Temporary
The impact is necessary to facilitate the installation of the emergency overflow pipe and level
spreader, which services stormwater basin 11 (please see Appendix H for details).
The impact is an extension of Impact Area P, which was previously permitted under the original
Phase III permit. The original stormwater design entailed installing the emergency overflow
distribution pipe, which would discharge out over a rip-rap dissipater and flow toward the level
spreader. However, during the construction process the configuration shifted, which required
relocating the distribution pipe further upstream, or more perpendicular, to the linear feature. The
additional impact is associated with the location of the pipe and fill necessary to bury it.
2.7 Permit Modification Impact Summary
All impacts are necessary to facilitate the completion of infrastructure and buildings associated
with all current phases of the project. The additional impacts have been minimized to the greatest
extent practicable. The table, on the following page, summarizes the additional impacts being
requested:
Page 4
MAKSOC Permit Modification & }zesolution Document
•
5EGi
Area Temp (SF) Temp (Ac.) Temp (LF) Perm (SF) Perm (Ac.) Perm (LF)
EE (NR) 0 0 0 461 0.011 154
HH (R) 0 0 0 3,134 0.072 NA
PP (R) 0 0 0 3,702 0.085 NA
QQ (R) 5,163 0.119 0 511 0.012 NA
D1 (NR) 378 0.009 63 1,206 0.027 201
N1 (NR) 0 0 0 133 0.003 45
P1 (NR) 555 0.009 93 352 0.008 59
Total (R) 5,163 0.119 0 7,347 0.168 0
Total (NR) 933 0.018 156 2,152 0.05 469
Total 6,096 0.139 156 9,499 0.218 459
Table 2-1. Permit Modification Impact Table (R - Riparian, NR - Non-Riparian).
3.0 AS-BUILT IMPACT SUMMARY
As dictated in special condition "i." of the provisional permit dated 9 October 2007 (please see
Appendix A for more details):
• The permittee will prepare a tracking report to monitor the impacts to waters of the United States
through the design and construction of the project. The report will contain a detailed outline of
water of the United States authorized to be impacted, any changes in final design, and the as-built
impacts.
Please refer to Appendix I, for the full tracking report and accompanying map. However, for your
convenience, the following table provides a brief summary of all the impacts to waters of the United
States associated with the project:
Non-riparian Non-riparian Riparian Riparian Intermittent Perennial Perennial
(P) (T) (P) (T) Stream (P) Stream (P) Stream (T)
Approved
Impacts 3.80 Ac. 0.0 0.56 Ac. 0.0 2,957 LF 83 LF 237 LF
As-Built
Impacts 3.68 Ac. 0.05 Ac. 0.44 Ac. 0.57 Ac. 1,274 LF 173 LF 197 LF
Permit Mod. 0.05 Ac. 0.139 Ac. 0.168 Ac. 0
0 0 0 0
Impacts .
Cumulative
Impacts 3.73 Ac. 0.05 Ac. 0.61 Ac. 0.57 Ac. 1,274 LF 173 LF 197 LF
Permit vs.
Cumulative (0.07) Ac. 0.05 Ac. 0.05 Ac. 0.0 (1,683 LF) 90 LF (40 LF)
Table 3-1: Summary of approved, existing, additional and cumulative impacts associated with the project. Please note 0
indicate impacts are less than what was permitted.
Page 5
DRAFT MAK50C Modification/Kesolution Document
5F.Gi
As denoted in Table 3-1, overall total impacts to non-riparian wetlands and streams are less than what
were originally permitted. According to the as-built survey, non-riparian wetland impacts total 162,264
SF (3.73 Ac.), while riparian wetland impacts total 26,449 SF (0.61 Ac.). Per the survey, intermittent
and perennial stream impacts total 1,274 LF and 173 LF respectively.
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION TIME LINE FOR AREAS OF CONCERN
•
•
As requested, the following table provides the estimated completion date for each area where additional
bank stabilization is necessary:
Location Name Action Taken Estimated Time of Completion(ETC)
Sediment Basin A Stabilization of bank at level spreader May 15th
Booker T Crossing Stabilization of bank extending from the road June 15th
RRR South Crossing Stabilization of east and west banks May 15th
BEQ Lot Stabilization of slope extending from parking lot June 15th
Pond 10 Stabilization of bank of stream at level spreader June 15th
't'able 4-1. Anticipated completion dates for corrective measures in areas, where without such actions, impacts
are expected.
Any alteration to the dates listed above, will require notification to the USACE and DWQ.
5.0 BAFFLE REMOVAL AND STREAM CHANNEL STABILIZATION
During the stream restoration process, baffles were installed to minimize sediment and silt migration
downstream of these areas. As agreed at the 4 February meeting, all baffles should be removed to allow
for normal creek bed-flow. This will allow sediments to reach a natural equilibrium and let native stream
and floodplain vegetation recolonize the restored areas. Coir log vanes are being utilized in various
locations within the site to assist stabilization of the stream channels and reduce the potential for head-
cutting to occur.
In some areas, such as those termed Areas of Concern (see Table 4-1), baffles may be re-installed during
the stabilization process and will be removed when the risk of sedimentation is no longer apparent.
Page 6
MAK50C Permit Modification & Kesolution Document `jEGl
6.0 MITIGATION COMPONENT
Pursuant to guidance set forth by federal and state agencies, compensatory mitigation is required to
offset wetland impacts, both permanent and temporary, that has taken place or will take place as a result
of the development activities. The proposed mitigation should be sufficient to replace the biological,
physical, and chemical functions of the affected wetland features.
6.1 Mitigation Status Summary
At this time, each of the compensatory mitigation components, have been initiated or fulfilled.
The North Mitigation Site has been graded and planted, while the South Mitigation Site has been
graded and is scheduled to be planted in the spring. Upon completion of the two mitigation sites,
as-built surveys of topography and vegetative plantings are to be submitted to the appropriate
regulatory agencies and a five (5) year, level 1, monitoring program is to ensue. Please refer to
Section 7 for details of the proposed monitoring program.
In conjunction with the 287 LF of permittee responsible mitigation, "payment to the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), for stream restoration credits, shall be made".
According to our records, payment for 2,953 LF of intermittent stream restoration was made to
the EEP (please see Appendix J). This amount exceeded the cumulative permanent stream
impacts for the project by 1596 LF, which is a surplus of EEP credits available to the Applicant.
6.2 Proposed Mitigation Plan
• 6.2.1 Additional Permanent Impact Mitigation
As discussed in Section 2, additional impacts to waters and wetlands are proposed with
this modification (please see Table 2-1 for details). Although the modification involves
accounting for an additional 0.05 Ac. of non-riparian and 0.168 Ac. of riparian wetland
impacts, during the construction process, approximately 0.12 Ac. of non-riparian and 0.12
Ac. of riparian wetlands were avoided (please refer to Table 3-1 for details). These figures
reflect a net avoidance of 0.07 Ac. of non-riparian and net increase 0.05 Ac. of riparian
wetlands. Due to the net decrease in cumulative impacts associated with the project, the
applicant is not proposing any additional mitigation.
6.2.2 Temporal Impact Mitigation
Perennial and intermittent streams were temporarily impacted during the construction
process (refer to Appendix M, entitled "Sedimentation Tracking Survey and Table", for
details of the temporarily impacted areas). In determining a mitigation-to-impact ratio
that will sufficiently offset the temporary loss of function in these systems, reach and
duration, biological characteristics of the impacted features, and natural sediment loads of
the streams in and around the MARSOC property were considered.
E
Page 7
DRAFT MAR50C Modification/Kesolution Document SE-6i
6.2.2.1 Reach and Duration
Prior to discussing the reach of the impacts associated with sedimentation, it is
important to point out the Wetland/Stream Impact Tracking exhibits imply that
sedimentation extended out to the boundary limits of all the wetland features.
However, this is not the case. For example, A3, on sheet V-2 of the
aforementioned exhibits, sediment did not cover the entire shaded area. It was
limited to the stream channel. Thus, mitigation was not offered for wetlands
abutting streams temporarily effected by sedimentation. These exhibits were
prepared for the sole purpose of illustrating the locations where sedimentation and
restoration occurred. To prepare exhibits that illustrated the exact limits of
sedimentation would have been a major undertaking and could not be completed
in a timely manner.
In addition to indicating where sediment deposition had occurred, the exhibits
illustrate where preventative measures had been installed (i.e., baffles). In some
areas, specifically A4 and R4, impacts did not reach as far upstream as depicted,
but due to the presence of baffles, the areas were included on the map. Thus,
approximately 218 LF upstream of A4 and 212 LF upstream of R4 were depicted
as being impacted, but were never influenced by sedimentation. This 430 linear
feet has been subtracted from the cumulative intermittent stream impact
calculations. Final sedimentation calculations are as follows:
• Stream TWpe Map Symbol Reach (LF)
Perennial A3, R3, FF1, FF2 1,644
Intermittent A4, R4, Yl, GG3, GG5, I1, L1 2,387
Several very heavy rain events caused breeches in sediment and erosion control
measures, which allowed sediment to enter into the noted stream systems.
Immediate action was taken to ensure that the systems were restored, as much as
possible, to their pre-impact conditions. In fact, areas A3, A4, R3 and R4 were
cleaned out within weeks of each rain event, which took place over a period of 3
months. Restoration of impact area Y I (an intermittent stream impact) was
completed within 6 months. Restoration consisted of removing the sediment by
shovel and bucket and installing baffles as safeguards against the potential for
future impacts downstream. During the removal of sediment, care was taken not to
disturb woody debris within the stream bed. In some areas more adversely
affected as a result of the clean-up, native vegetation has already been or will be
planted, which is expected to expedite the features' functional recovery. Photos of
the restored areas are taken weekly and show the areas are recovering, as
expected.
6.2.2.2 Biologic Characteristics
Perennial streams have flowing water year round and are capable of supporting a
variety of aquatic species. Intermittent streams have flowing water during certain
Page 8
MAZ5OC Permit Modification & Kcsolution Document 5E-6i
times of the year and the biological community is composed of species that are
• aquatic during a portion of their life history or they move to perennial water
resources. Based on this knowledge, it is anticipated the sediment deposition
would have less of an effect on the benthic communities of an intermittent stream
than that of the perennial stream. Thus, a less weighted mitigation-to-impact ratio
is proposed for the intermittent streams affected by temporary sediment
deposition.
6.2.2.3 Natural Sediment Loads of MARSOC Streams
The sandy soils of the Coastal Plains region of North Carolina and the local
topography, specifically the headwaters of the undulating terrain within
MARSOC, contribute to the erosion of these head cut systems. As a result of the
erosion, heavy sediment deposition occurs during periods of heavy precipitation.
An undisturbed zero order stream system, located to the northwest of the water
tower, was evaluated for natural erosion and sediment deposition. The subject
stream provides a good example of how these eroding/head cut systems naturally
produce sediment levels that exceed what one would expect to find in areas that
exhibit a gentler gradient. Above the origin of the zero order stream is a pocosin-
type, terraced wetland mass. This pocosin wetland narrows to a small channel,
downgrade towards the larger wetland system, to which it drains. The channel
starts out flat and then naturally erodes into a deeply incised (approximately 2 foot
• deep), almost linear channel, with nearly vertical banks. These banks are stable
above the trim line, but evidence of erosion is evidenced by deposition of sandy
material near the bottom of the channel, where it meets the next order stream.
Several log and root blockages were noted as well. The first order stream, to
which this feature drains, was much more broad and slow flowing, and was filled
with logs, roots, and natural sandbar-type features in its bed (see Appendix N).
6.2.3 Temporal Impact Mitigation Summary
In summary, it was determined that sediment deposition temporarily impacted 1,644 LF
of perennial streams and 2,387 LF of intermittent streams. The duration of impact was
minimized by the rapid restoration efforts performed by the Applicant, which ranged from
a few weeks to 6 months. The biological processes impacted by the sedimentation events
differ between perennial and intermittent systems and should be mitigated accordingly.
And, natural sedimentation events occur naturally in head cut systems within the
MARSOC project area.
With that said, the Applicant is proposing a 0.1:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio for
temporary impacts to intermittent streams and 0.3:1 for the temporary impacts to
perennial streams. An average mitigation-to-impact ratio of 0.18:1 is believed to offset
the loss of biologic function supported by the systems. The Applicant intends to utilize
available EEP stream restoration credit as compensatory mitigation. In total, 732 linear
0 feet of stream restoration credit ($236,436.00) will be appropriated for the purpose of
Page 9
DKAFT MAKSOC Modification/Resolution Document SE.G
offsetting temporary impacts to perennial and intermittent streams within the MARSOC
. project boundaries.
6.3 Mitigation Summary
In summary, the Applicant is proposing mitigation to offset the additional impacts
requested with the permit modification and the temporal impacts that occurred during
construction with the EEP stream restoration credits already paid for and allocated to the
project through EEP, USACE and DWQ. These credits are available due to an over
payment to the organization based on previously anticipated impact calculations. As
mentioned in Section 6.1, a surplus of 1596 LF of stream restoration credit is available to
the project. Subtracting the proposed 732 LF of stream restoration credit, which is the
proposed mitigation for temporary impacts that occurred as a result of sedimentation,
from the excess leaves a balance of 864 LF of stream restoration credit at the EEP. The
Applicant and/or WT reserves the right to pursue a refund for the balance of the credits
from the EEP or dedicate those credits to a bank, which will be available for future Camp
Lejeune projects.
7.0 MONITORING PROPOSAL
• Monitoring of the sedimentation areas was discussed during the 4 February 2010 meeting and a
monitoring plan was approved with the IP dated 28 March 2008 (please see Appendix K for the full
approved monitoring plan). The following sections outline the proposed monitoring plan for the
restoration areas and north and south mitigation sites.
7.1. Restoration Areas
Monitoring of the areas affected by sedimentation will be performed during the regular weekly
NPDES monitoring. Representative photographs of the restoration areas will be taken and a
general description of the vegetation recorded. Any areas that require additional work will be
documented and a report of the findings with any remedial action taken will be submitted to the
USACE and DWQ within 30 days of the inspection. Monitoring of the restoration areas will be
conducted until January 1, 2011.
7.2. North Site and South Site Mitigation Areas
Post-construction monitoring of the two on-site mitigation areas will follow the approved
monitoring plan, which consists of the following:
1. Initial Vegetative Monitoring - Shall take place 1 - 2 months after completion of the
mitigation sites and will include a qualitative analysis of the newly planted vegetation.
•
Page 10
MAKSOC Permit Modification & Kesolution Document

2. Annual Monitoring - Shall take place for a period of five (5) years, with reports being
• submitted to the appropriate agencies prior to the end of the calendar year of the
respective monitoring period. The monitoring reports will include: hydrologic
monitoring; vegetative monitoring; soil monitoring; and stability monitoring and will
provide written and fixed-point photographic documentation of the monitoring
evaluations. In addition recommendations for corrective action necessary to ensure the
success of the restoration area(s) will be included in the reports.
The final monitoring report will be submitted at the end of the five-year monitoring
period. As noted in the MARSOC On-Site Wetland Monitoring Plan, the reports will be
prepared in accordance with the USACE Regulatory Guidance Letter on Minimum
Monitoring Requirements for Compensatory Mitigation Projects Involving the Creation,
Restoration, and/or Enhancement of Aquatic Resources.2
3. Success of the on-site mitigation areas shall be based on the following criteria:
Hydrology - indications of overbank flooding (i.e., water in floodplain, evidence
of wrack lines, sediment deposits, and/or scour points in the floodplain);
Vegetation - at least 50 percent of all dominant species are facultative (FAC) or
• wetter, excluding FAC- plants, the diversity of at least four (4) of the nine (9)
woody wetland plants from the USACE approved plant list on the mitigation plan
occurs, and the species density, 3 years after planting, is at least 320 trees per acre
and 5 years after planting is 260 trees per acre; and
Channel Stability - the evidence of low bank erosion and that the feature's
dimensions are uniform and consistent.
7.3 Temporary Impact Areas Associated with Additional Impacts
These areas are associated with additional impact areas D1, P1, and QQ, as well as the 197 LF of
temporary stream impacts associated with the installation of the north and south Rifle Range
Road crossings. The Applicant is proposing a monitoring plan that is to consist of providing a
narrative of findings and accompanying photographs to the USACE and DWQ. These reports are
to be submitted quarterly. Monitoring shall commence immediately and shall be discontinued
June 2012 or at such time the Corps deems the restoration successful.
• 2 US Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Guidance Letter, No. 02-02. Subject: Guidance on Compensatory
Mitigation Projects for Aquatic Resource Impacts under the Corps Regulatory Program Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Page 11
DRAFT MAK50C Modification/Kesolution Document 5E-Gi
8.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACT SUMMARY
The table below and the following page provides acreages for all the impact areas, as well as the
cumulative impacts for the entire project:
•
•
NON-RIPARIAN
WETLAND RIPARIAN
WETLAND
INTERMITTENT STREAM PERENNIAL
STREAM
IMPACT AREA SF Ac SF Ac LF LF
D 1,190 0.027 0 0.000 0 0
X 3,466 0.080 0 0.000 0 0
E 2,157 0.050 0 0.000 0 0
F 18,729 0.430 0 0.000 240 0
H 54,818 1.258 0 0.000 127 0
K 24,440 0.561 0 0.000 86 0
AA 0 0.000 0 0.000 90 0
A 0 0.000 945 0.022 123 0
R 0 0.000 1,691 0.039 98 0
1362 4,592 0.105 0 0.000 0 0
V 3,797 0.087 0 0.000 0 0
V1 0 0.000 0 0.000 139 0
V2 0 0.000 1,391 0.032 0 89
U 549 0.013 0 0.000 0 0
T 10,704 0.246 0 0.000 0 0
M 25,132 0.577 0 0.000 0 0
P 886 0.020 0 0.000 0 0
Q 640 0.015 0 0.000 0 0
0 0 0.000 0 0.000 152 0
S 2,379 0.055 0 0.000 0 0
B 853 0.020 0 0.000 0 0
Y 937 0.022 0 0.000 0 0
Z 920 0.021 0 0.000 0 0
DD 2,914 0.067 0 0.000 0 0
DD1 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0
GG2 0 0.000 5,507 0.126 143 0
GG4 0 0.000 4,295 0.099 78 0
GG7 0 0.000 3,865 0.089 0 0
FF 0 0.000 1,409 0.032 0 84
M1 590 0.014 0 0.000 0 0
111 418 0.010 0 0.000 0 0
D1 1,206 0.028 0 0.000 0 0
H H 0 0.000 3,134 0.072 0 0
Page 12
MAK50C Permit Modification & Kesolution Document
0
Table 8-1. Cumulative Impact Summary.
5EGi
PP 0 0.000 3,702 0.085 0 0
N1 133 0.003 0 0.000 0 0
P1 352 0.008 0 0.000 0 0
EE 461 0.011 0 0.000 0 0
QQ 0 0.000 511 0.012 0 0
As-Built Totals 162,263 3.725 26,449 0.607 1,274 173
Permitted Totals 165,548 3.800 24,398 0.560 2,957 83
Difference (3,285) (0.075) 2,051A 0.047 (1,683) 90
Please see Appendix L, which maps each wetland type (i. e., riparian, non-riparian, perennial stream,
intermittent stream).
9.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the US Marine Corps Base - Camp Lejeune, The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., and
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. sincerely hope the information found within and attached to this
document sufficiently addresses the DWQ's and USACE's concerns regarding as-built impacts; the
restoration of unauthorized impacts; justification for the need to modify the Individual Permit and Water
• Quality Certification, to include accounting for an additional 0.049 Ac. of non-riparian and 0.168 Ac. of
riparian wetland permanent impacts to 404 jurisdictional wetlands; and the compensatory mitigation
related to the development.
SEGi would like to commend the Applicant and WT on their quick responses to all of the challenges that
arose during the construction process. Their actions illustrate a steadfast ambition to bring the project
back into full compliance with the guidelines and regulations set forth by the Clean Water Act. It is our
hope that the agencies will recognize this effort and take it into consideration, while proceeding with the
issuance of the permit modification and finding of resolution.
Thank you for your continued assistance with this project. If you should need additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact our office at 910.452.2711. We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
Dana A. Lutheran
SEGi Project Manager
•
Page 13
MARSOC Permit Modification & Resolution Document
•
Appendix A
US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (9 October 2007)

•
Page i
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
CESAW-RG (1145b)
9 October 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. John Townson, US Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004, Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
SUBJECT. Action ID: 2007 286 067 Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for wetland
fill associated with the construction of the Marine Special Operations Command Complex
(MARSOC) located in the former Stone Bay Rifle Range Area in Onslow County, North
Carolina.
1. In accordance with your complete written request of 9 February 2007, and the ensuing
administrative record, enclosed are two copies of a permit to fill Section 404 wetlands and
jurisdictional stream for the placement of the MARSOC, within the Stone Bay Area, abutting the
New River, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. This correspondence represents a conditional permit
in that a North Carolina Coastal Consistency Statement has not been issued to date. This is not a
final permit and work within jurisdictional areas should not begin.
2. You should acknowledge that you accept the terms and conditions of the enclosed permit by
• signing and dating each copy in the spaces provided ("Permittee" on page 3). Your signature, as
permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with all of the terms and conditions of
this permit. All pages of both copies of the signed permit with drawings should then be returned
to this office for final authorization. A self-addressed envelope is enclosed for your
convenience.
3. This correspondence contains an initial provisional permit for the above described activity. If
you object to this decision or the enclosed special conditions you may request that the District
Commander reconsider his decision. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this decision you
must submit a completed RFA form to the District Commander, Wilmington District Corps of
Engineers at the following address:
Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., District Commander
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete,
and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 9
December 2007.
0
• CESAW-RG (1145b
SUBJECT: Action ID: 2007 286 067 Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for wetland
fill associated with the construction of the Marine Special Operations Command Complex
(MARSOC) located in the former Stone Bay Rifle Range Area in Onslow County, North
Carolina.
"It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the
decision in contained in this correspondence."
4. After the permit is authorized in this office, the original copy will be returned to you; the
duplicate copy will be permanently retained in this office. Should you have questions, please
contact Mr. Brad Shaver, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, at telephone [phone].
2 Encls John E. Pulliam, Jr. zi- Al
Colonel, EN Vad
Commanding
• CF:
Mr. Marty Korenek
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
Mr. Howard Hall
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
is 2
s-
NOTIFICiIQQT??'vi1N(SI?tAT1VI`AI'PE1L' ©f?I'f0'? r1IDIZQPS'AN'
Applicant: USMC - Camp Le'eune File Number 2007-2 6-067
Date 10/9/2007
Attached is: A
INITIAL PROVISIONAL PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of perm
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
A
B
C
D
E
a L Iuiv l o owln?ide i3 s your'. rights 4d opt ins re a zi?n a ?` " ? . " tveYa peal of the `aboire;
decision A,?dmtiozial irtfoririatton ziiay. be found at litter?nvw.usace.ari?iti.tz{etJfuta¢ton?cw/cecwOfie- or
o..a_
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including it; terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you'object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
See Section below
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTI0I4II . RE0.UES'I T'()R APPEAL or D13JECT10 rn:A.t t.iM Tr r_ nnn r. n t,an n,, .,m
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
P.TZ?'CfJI` "ClZ :5''+35 OR - -
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
h9rad Shaver Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
rogram Manager CESAD-ET-CO-R
P.O. Box 1890 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Geor 'a 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investi gatinnc
Date: Telephone number.
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Brad Shaver, Project Manager, Wilmington
Regulatory Field Office, P.O. Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9MI5, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
0

PROVISIONAL PERMIT
NOT VALID
DO NOT BEGIN WORK
This PROVISIONAL PERMIT is NOT VALID until:
1. You obtain:
a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality.
XX a Coastal Zone Consistency determination concurrence from the North Carolina
• Division of Coastal Management.
1. You sign and return the enclosed provisional permit with the State Section 401 Water Quality
Certification and/or CZM concurrence and the appropriate permit fee as indicated below:
$ 10.00 $100.00 XX No fee required
2. The Corps signs the permit and returns it to you.
Your permit is denied without prejudice, if the State denies your Section 401 Water Quality
Certification and/or nonconcurs with your Coastal Zone Management consistency determination.
DO NOT BEGIN WORK
0
• DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Permittee US Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MARSOC)
Permit No. 2007 286 067
Issuing Office CESAW-RG
NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this
office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted
activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer.
You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below.
Project Description: Fill Section 404 wetlands and jurisdictional stream for the placement of the
MARSOC.
Project Location: Within the Stone Bay Area, abutting the New River, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina.
• Permit Conditions:
General Conditions:
1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on December 31, 2017 If you find that you need more time
to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month
before the above date is reached.
2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and
conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may
make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain
the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this
permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area.
3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by
this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination
required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places.
ENG FORM 1721, Nov 86 EDITION OF SEP 82 IS OBSOLETE. (33 CFR 325 (Appendix A))
0
• 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided
and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization.
5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified
in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it
contains such conditions.
6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure
that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit,
Special Conditions:
SEE ATTACHED SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Further Information:
1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to:
( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(X) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413).
• 2. Limits of this authorization.
a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law.
b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others.
d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project.
3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following:
a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural
causes.
b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf
of the United States in the public interest,
c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity
authorized by this permit.
d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work.
•
0 e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit.
4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public
interest was made in reliance on the information you provided.
5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances
warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or
inaccurate (See 4 above).
c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision
Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation
procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The
referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms
and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any
corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations
(such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the convective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the
cost.
6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit, Unless
there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest
decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit.
Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
(PERMITTEE) US MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE (DATE)
This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below.
(DISTRICTENGINEER) JOHN E. PULLIAM, JR., COLONEL
(DATE)
When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and
conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit
and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below.
(TRANSFEREE)
(DATE)
'U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1986 - 717-425
0
•
Special Conditions:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Action ID 2007 286 067)
In accordance with 33 U.S.C. 1341 (d), all conditions of the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality 401 Certification are incorporated as part of the Department of the
Army permit, and attached for your convenience. Therefore, they are not listed as special
conditions. The following Special Conditions will be added to the permit.
a. This permit is issued as a provisional permit and will be finalized upon
receipt of the North Carolina Coastal Consistency Certificate. The project
is separated into three (3) phases; Fiscal Year (FY) 07 projects, FY 08
projects, and Future Buildings. Each phase will require separate review
and approval related to the review of final plans for sequencing (avoidance
and minimization) and mitigation. This office, through the design build
process, will participate on the design team to review and approve
sequencing and mitigation.
b. Prior to the construction of each phase, the Corps must approve
sequencing and mitigation in writing as well as receive final plans to be
• utilized for compliance purposes.
Mitigation options for each phase must be evaluated in the following
order; (1) on site in kind mitigation (2) near site in kind mitigation (3) off
site in kind mitigation, and (4) the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
This preference order must be followed in accordance with the Corps EPA
Memorandum of Agreement concerning the determination of mitigation
under the Clean Water Act.
** Note : on site stream and wetland mitigation has been noted within the
Stone Bay Rifle Range property and near site in kind stream mitigation
has been noted within Camp Lejeune mainside.
d. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance
with the attached plans and application (signed by John Townson February
8, 2007 with attached application stamped received February 9, 2007), or,
as appropriate, modifications and updates generated during the design
build phase of this project, which, upon final approval, will become a part
of this permit. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will be
participating within the design build framework to assure further
avoidance and minimization of this proposal.
0
. e. The permittee shall employ all sedimentation and erosion control
measures necessary to prevent a significant increase in sedimentation or
turbidity within waters and wetlands outside the permit area. This shall
include, but is not limited to, the immediate installation of silt fencing or
similar appropriate devices around all areas subject to soil disturbance or
the movement of earthen fill, and the immediate stabilization of all
disturbed areas. Additionally, the project must remain in full compliance
with all aspects of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North
Carolina General Statutes Chapter 113A Article 4).
f. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification
to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land-clearing activities
shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this
project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not authorize
temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material
within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition
applies to all borrow and fill activities connected with this project.
g. Unless otherwise authorized by this permit, all fill material placed in
waters or wetlands shall be generated from an upland source and will be
clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal products,
organic materials (including debris from land clearing activities), or
• unsightly debris will not be used.
h. Except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill
or mechanized land-clearing activities shall take place at any time in the
construction or maintenance of this project, in such a manner as to impair
normal flows and circulation patterns within waters or wetlands or to
reduce the reach of waters or wetlands.
i. The permittee will prepare a tracking report to monitor the impacts to
waters of the United States through the design and construction of the
project. The report will contain a detailed outline of the waters of the
United States authorized to be impacted, any changes in final design, and
the as-built impacts.
j. The permittee shall submit final design plans to this office for review and
approval for each construction phase at least 40 days prior to the start of
construction in that phase. The permittee may not start construction of a
phase until after the Corps has approved, in writing, the final design plans
for that phase. The tracking report shall be submitted with the design
plans.
k. Upon completion of each construction phase, the permittee shall submit to
the Corps as-built plans for that phase of the project for those portions that
affect waters of the US, within six months following the completion of
• construction. The as-built plans shall include, but not necessarily be
limited to, grading, structures, and limits of disturbance to wetlands and
streams. The waters of the US tracking table, as well as a brief narrative
describing the impacts to waters of the United States, including wetlands,
shall accompany the as-built plans.
L The permittee shall further avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the
United States, including jurisdictional wetlands, wherever practicable in
the development of final design plans for each phase of the project.
in. The pennitee shall implement the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the Marine Corps Camp Lejeune and the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office regarding the MARSOC construction project.
Any modifications and/or changes in the MOA shall be coordinated with
the Wilmington District Office prior to commitment.
n. All mechanized equipment will be regularly inspected and maintained to
prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. In the event of a spill of
petroleum products or any other hazardous waste, the permittee shall
immediately report it to the N.C. Division of Water Quality at (919) 733-
5083, Ext. 526 or [phone] and provisions of the North Carolina
• Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act will be followed.
o. The applicant will notify the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Regulatory Division, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office prior to
conducting the work. The current Corps point of contact is Mr. Brad
Shaver, [phone].
p. This Department of the Army permit does not obviate the need to obtain
other Federal, State or local authorizations required by law.
q. While accomplishing the authorized work, if the permittee discovers any
previously unknown Federally endangered or threatened species, the
District Engineer will be immediately notified so that required
coordination can be initiated with the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). If, at any time, a
Federally protected species is incidentally injured or killed during work,
all work operations must be immediately halted and the permittee must
consult with our office prior to reinitiating work.
r. While accomplishing the authorized work, if the permittee discovers any
previously unknown cultural resources, the District Engineer will be
immediately notified so that required coordination can be initiated with the
North Carolina Division of Cultural Resources.
0
• s. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision
on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that
could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the permitee's
failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit or
significant new information which this office did not consider in reaching
the original public interest decision.
t. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with
the terms and conditions of this permit in the construction and
maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its contractors
and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this
project with a copy of this permit. A copy of this permit, including all
conditions, shall be available at the project site during construction and
maintenance of this project.
u. Violations of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act must be reported in
writing to the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within 24
hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.
•
•
• NCDENR-DWQ Conditions:
Conditions of Water Quality Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
404 Wetlands 12.5 acres permanent impacts Site Plan -Master Plan Wetlands Impact dtd
(9.0 acres riparian, 3.5 acres January 24, 2007
non-riparian)
1.41 acres temporary impacts
Streams Site Plan -Master Plan Wetlands Impact dtd
12,800 linear feet January 24, 2007

.wv+iau.?a? [Ulu Lit VOW11 %-VIIUUI:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and
Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Pemrit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
0
and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six
months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Continuing Compliance:
Mr. John Townson and the United States Marine Corps, shall conduct construction activities
in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements
resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other
appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such
standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved
use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to include
conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the Division
shall notify Mr. John Townson and the United States Marine Corps and the US Army Corps
of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide
opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised
conditions shall be provided to Mr. John Townson and/or the United States Marine Corps in
writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any
Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become
conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
0
Mitigation:
6. Compensatory Mitigation Using a Mitigation Bank
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below.
We understand that you intend to use credits from the Greater Sandy Run Wetland
Mitigation Bank located on and owned by Camp Lejeune in Onslow County as described
in your application to meet this mitigation requirement. Our records show that the
Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in Onslow County is available for credit
release for non-riparian wetlands for your project. As project design is refined, Camp
Lejeune shall identify the credits used from the bank, and provide updated account sheets
to DWQ. This contribution has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to
meet the mitigation requirement. For accounting purposes, this Authorization
Certificate authorizes use of the Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank to
meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub-basin Number
Non-Riparian Wetlands 7.0 acres required [represents 2:1 White Oak/030502
miti Lion for 3.5 acres filled
7. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) or other
alternatives
• We understand that the Marine Corps may wish to utilize the NC Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) for stream and riparian mitigation credits for this project.
As of March 26, 2007, the EEP had provided confirmation that mitigation would be
provided for up to 5.0 acres of riparian wetlands and 13,000 linear feet of streams. Please
note that a fmal, specific request will need to be sent to the EEP, and a formal acceptance
letter must be received from the EEP in order for this agreement to be finalized. If the
EEP does not accept responsibility for all riparian mitigation credits needed for this
project, then an additional, alternative mitigation plan shall be pursued by the applicant in
order to meet the remaining mitigation requirements. If EEP does accept responsibility
for this project, please note that this has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable
method to meet mitigation requirements. Until the EEP receives and clears a check
(made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office) for a specifically
identified impact location(s), the specific impacts specified in this Authorization
Certificate shall not occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you have
any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. For accounting purposes,
this Authorization Certiflcate authorizes payment into the Wetland and Stream
Restoration Funds to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirements;
however, to date, the EEP has not provided formal approval for use of the EEP
program for this project:
•
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin Number
Riparian Wetlands Up to 18.0 acres riparian White Oak/030502
wetlands mitigation may be
needed from the EEP or
another alternative [represents
2:1 mitigation for 9.0 acres
filled
Streams 12,800 feet White Oak/030502
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached Certificate of Completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
•

% C { T
3 3 m
m ro ro
cc n o n a
5 m
N ? tln
m N
s`
A A
E o (r
tip' ?fe k 1.
45
-!war
f
T
r 1, j
r 4\-
`I

MAK50C Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix B
US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (16 October 2008)

•

Page ii

DEPARTMENT oI+ rin A17NIV
ttALNItNGTON DISTRY,'T, CORPS OF ENGINL',EIVi
P.O. BOX' 189()
\All1 R'lINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
PHIL% 1U
Al-I C1111ON (iI
CF,SAW-RG (114-51))
16 October 2008
MEWIZANDtJM FOR Mr..Iohn Townson, US Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004, Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
SUBJECT: Action ID: 2007 286 067 Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for wetland
(ill associated with the construction of the Marine Special Operations Command Complex
(P,/IAP.SOC) located iri the former Stone Bay Rifle Range Area in Onslow County, North
Carolina.
1. hi acuind wx v,6(11 yore complete written request of9 February 2007, and the ensuing
administrative record, a provisional permit was issued on 26 November 2007 to fill wetlands and
jurisdictional sireams, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for the
placement of the MARSOC, within the Stone Bay Area, abutting the New River, ('amp Lejeune,
North Carolina. On 24 September 2008, the US Arlrly Corps of )?Ilbnicel5 (USACE) received a
cover letter requesting the last approval for Phase 3 of the MA.RSOC facility entitled FY07 and
FY08 Areas (excluding Headquarters and Road Relocation) dated revision (G) 9/18/2008. The
USAGE is hereby issuing an individual authorization for the Phase 3-FY07 and FY08 Areas.
2. Following Phase It authorization, 1 12 linear feet of strearn channel was not peinianentl.y
impacted by the Phase 2 road relocation project as originally reported. Temporary impact resulted
from this construction. These temporary impacts should be restored by removing all temporary
sedimentation control measures once the disturbed area has been stabilized and restored to it
original dimensions, Once these areas have been completely restored, the applicant must provide
photographic evidence of the restoration. These photos can be submitted to this office either
through mail or email to the Corps Project Manager, Mr. Brad Shaver. This restoration and
sul)sequellt photographic evidence should be submitted to Mr. Shaver within 30 days of the
completed road construction.
3. Based on (I-ie strF)rnittal by your consultant, USm-C-Camp Lejeune has indicated that a
portion of the required mitigation, 2,310 linear feet of stream and 0.47 acres of riparian wetlands,
will be compensated through payment into the NC Ecosystern Enhancement Program (EEP).
This compensation is consistent with the administrative record and receipt of lmyl-nent should be
copied to this office hefore work is initiated within the jurisdictional areas
4 To comperisatc for lire nOn riparian wetland impacts associated with the F`J, 07 and 1'Y Oft
P.reas, USNIC, Camp I_Jeunt v"vili utilize 1.9 iicres of restored rrou riparian wetlands fnom their
Greater Sandy Run Area R/Iiti1-ation Bank. 'I'he debited totals should be reported to the ('w-ps as
required by the approved nritigallon hankin_ instrument.
•
(TS A W-l\'(; (I I XI 56)
Sl 1f31F,(-r ??etirn7 11 2002 2W) Ob7 Issuance of it Oepalhnenl of the Al lily Permit for wetland
1111 Associated With thu construction of the Marine; Speci?d Operations Comlliand Complex
(MARSOC) located in the former Stone Bay Rifle Range Area in Onsloxv County, North
Cal-ohna
5 As stated in the Phase 2 approval, the South Mitigation Site should be completed
concurrently with the authorization of Phase 3 (FY 07 and FY 08 Areas). There has been a
commitment made by Whiting Turner to complete all mitigalion prior to contract completion
with the Navy in 2010.
6. The on-site mitigation should be properly stabilized using sediment erosion control best
management practices during construction. The on-site mitigation shall be monitored according
to the approved monitoring plan received by this office on March 25, 2008.
7. This Phase 3 includes a commitment to construct two bridges, Fridge No. 1 and Bridge No.
2. As described in the recent request, the consultant indicates that the bridges will be constructed
by top down construction techniques which will result in the temporary impact to 0.57 acres of
wetlands and 125 linear feet of stream. Neither the vertical clearance of the bridge nor the
spacing of pilings in the stream, as it relates to the thalweg, has been decided to date. Prior to
construction of these bridges, the Corps must review and approve the final bridge plans, to
include the construction sequence and final anticipated temporary impacts.
8. if any change in the authorized work is required because of unforeseen or altered conditions
or for any other reason, the revised plans showing the changes must be sent promptly to this
office. Such action is necessary, as revised plans must be reviewed, approved and the permit
modified.
9. Certain significant general conditions remain and require that:
You must comPICte construction buJbre 31 December 2017.
You must allow representatives from this office to make periodic visits to your worksite
as deemed necessary to assure compliance with permit plans and conditions.
10_ Poll must notify this office in advance as to when you intelld to commence and complete
each phase of wodc.
•
•
•
(-'ESAW-kG (1 145h)
StJBJLCl': Action ID: 2007 286 067 Issuance (Act I)CI Mrtnient of the Army Permit for wetland
fill associated with the construction of the Marine Special Operations Command Complex
(MARSOC) located in the former Stone Ray RiAe Range Area in O11SIoW County, North
Carolina.
11. `phis office is returning a stamped approved Phase A4ap which covers the authorized activity.
Should you have gUeStlons, please contact Mr. Brad Shavei", Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
at [phone].
Enci
CF two/encl):
Chief, Source Data Unit
NOAA/National Ocean Service
A.TTN: Sharon Tear N/CS261
1315 East-west Hwy., Rm 7316
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
CI?,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office fox 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beauf'od, North Carolina 28516
Mr. 1(01111]( .1. Milnilak, Chief
Wetlands Proteclion ,Section
Water Management Division
hm,ironmenlal Protection AgencA,/
61 Forsyth Sheet, , Av
Atlanta, ( ieorgia 3(RO3
Y.YSCAVAACGE
J FERSON Colonel, EN
Commanding
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
fv9r. David Racliley
National Marine Fisheries Service.
219 Fort Johnson Road
(-I harleston, South Carolina 29412-9110
0

•
,? -.i t0 C ¦ a LL.) I C
J Z m ? (n ? > ? ? .L
rJ U L) (h
v ° ? 0 ? 111
r 0 >
(- rooms Q o o
m?oC? o ? ? cli
i o c°a j W O O
5 o O i.? U u
72 c? m
w v?
i a n? E m ¢ < O
¢ m 4 f- U IL
2 a LL
o z m of 0 m .o Li.l n
> gi a D m LLJ Q ] LLJ
O D U J Z O -_j
? w n
Q3
a mo o'C v? a p y
Am E c n` Z D' Ln
?L. Ecu aw y d
A (A
L L m~ m a m X O
p t? c fL
-- > W V)
Q ca
?Mr o- i L <I- q <,-) <1 "
Z

`E d

Q

2 co?

Eli

O°
U
a-

Z z? "

0

¢pOa
?C,
zwa

Q a
t
a

v`,

`c

z
YmOm x
z L0 <>
zm?&j c

?? o?
2~ in a
Z°? n mo
F-? u
D
rz
Q Q
?Z .. k
' o
P: Zr:.- ow'24
z?? m
ro
L. J
E =
¢¢
t J ¢
Z < =) - .s
C7 WQQ
1 < :) x
0Wd J
¢ ¢
Z D
j
O? d a 'N ? a w m 2 a p m 0
Q J J
Q
CO Q J O
¢
0 <, N 6
!n ¢ - J m
N
O
-- ~ F F t
U
ro

W O
F- Q O_
U) Q)
F'
x 0
? ro
F
-
oC
U
wpW
U
d
Z 9
0
gw
m
i ¢-j
J cr
JpC Uo 0
C)
w
-
?x?LU
?xg
wm
o
W ?Wp LL WU >

_ Q
o p
u?0
w ro
0

oc
CL
CL.
Z
w
C)
tf T
I
. G O
i?
0O a
Z
5
G
a

6 7
v
•
•
•
07/08 DMP LOCATIONS
- 07/08 LEVEL SPREADER
LOCATIONS
CLEARING LIMITS'07
< <I cv
\ w
w
1Fl?
w
.1
;,
t
-'
x
A
Total amount of resources present per "Survey of Wetlands and Stream Origins, Marsoc Cantornenr Area", July 2007.
No permanent impacts per de minimus effect on aquatic resources.
Actual impacts reduced from permitted values due to shorter culverts installers. Temporary impacts added due to
actual clearing performed. NUMBERED NOTES
Al EXISTING CULVERT TO BE REMOVED AND STREAM CHANNEL RE-ESTABLISHED
12 \. STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL RELOCAI ION
AFOOTBRIDGE OVER WETLANDS CROSSING
A `* 1 CULVERT UNDER ROADWAY
,& PROPOSED PILE SUPPORTED BRIDGE OVER NURSERY AREAS
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
NON-RIPARIAN RIPARIAN INTERMITTENT/
WETLAND WET AND PERRENIAL
NOWRIPARIAN STREAM
HEADQUARTERS GSRA MITIGATION BANK _ N/A NORTH CAROLINA
(CAMP LEJEUNE) TO BE ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
UTILIZED AT 1:1.5 RATIO, PROGRAM (EEP) CREDITS
TOTAL: 2.53 Ac, x 1.5 = 3.8 Ac. FOR 514 LF OF STREAM
ROAD RELOCATION- N/A ON-SITE CREDrrs AT OtJ-SITE CREDITS AT 1:1 FOR
1:1 RATIO. TOTAL.. 87 LF OF STREAM, EEP
0.10 Ac CREDITS FOR 217 LF OF
FY07 AREAS GSRA MITIGATION BANK _
PI!A NORTH CAROLINA - EEP
(EXCLUDING (CAMP LEJEUNE) TO BE CREDITS FOR 847 LF
HEADQUARTERS AND ITILIZED AT 1:1.5 RATIO.
ROAD RELQCAl"IGPJ)= TOTAL: 0.36 Ac, x 1.5 = 0.58 Ac.
FY08 AREAS GSRA MITIGATION BANK NORTH CAROLINA - PIOR I H CAROLINA EEP
(EXCLUDING (CAMP LEJEUNE) TO BE EEP CREDITS AT I:1 CREDITS FOR 1,375 LF
VEHICULAR BNIDGES UTILIZED AT 1:1.5 RATIO RATIO. TOTAL-
TO TAL: 0.88 Ac. x 1.5 - 1.32 Ac. 0.47 Ar,.
VEHICULAR N!A N/A -- NIA

BRIDGES STREAM
TEMPORARY
I M PACTS
N/A
? 1111
IL ?
Mt j
U
•Y
i •'
DES JRF
RENEWED BY
PM/DM
CHIEF ENr/F.I
I
Ix
14 z
y i
I
J
yz
U
0
U
F
z
Q
0
t
SEE SIIEET2
z
t
a
W
NIA
I o i

CODE 10. 11-
?CALE
mkx"'D Nc
NiA
r hHa n:
WGkk DHfkn

SL=E SHEEr 2
I ---
I,:
mom aeon program approach based on updated -1 - ----
(6116,106) pre-final site design.
Mitigation for temporary impacts due to addit/onal clearing for culverts has been implemented.
,..?..h..a..w.u.......,.v?... CLEARING LIMITS "08
IMPACTED WETLAND AR EAS
NCN-RIPARIAN RIPARIAN INTERMITTENT PERRENIAL. TEMPORARY
WETLAND WETLAND STREAM STREAM IMPACTS
Headquarters 110,237 SF12.53 Ac 0 SF/0 Ac 514 LF 0 LF N/A
Road Relocation 0 SF/0 Ac 4,033 SF/0.10 Ae 304 LF 0 LF 112 LF
(ACTUAL)
FY 2007 Totals 166,833 SF/0.39 Ac 0 SF/0 Ac 847 IF 0 LF N/A
(Excluding HQ &
Road Relocation)
-
-
F7
2008 Totals 38,478 SF10.88 Ac 20,385 SF/0.47 Ac 1,292 LF 83 LF N/A
(Excluding
Vehicular Brldgos)
Vehicular N/A O SF- N/A 0 {_F" 24,087 SF/0.57 Ac;
Bridges 125 LF Stream
Project Impacts 165,348 SF13.80 Ac 24,398 SF/0.56 Ac 2,957 LF 83 I-F N/A
Welland Survey 92 Ac 9.1 Ac i7,287 uz i7, l76 Lr• NIA
Totals °
Sl lCTT
C
•
r?
•
MAK50C Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix C
Impact Area EE Details
Page iii
5r-Gi
O
Ln

N O
00 Op

w
N
O ry
O O d O 11
+ _"
N
O
?t
I I
O O L
O -?
Q
Ln U
+ cn
o
z-
O
O
+
w CU
J a
o LL
r
O'-NO
Z a' w
L CL W
0
0MC) (f) LL
0Zz OCn
0< Zoo
-izQN
<<J?
c)J~d'
r?w
3: U
L Z
M
Q cvj
N-
0
wr ?? owuus't?,+wo'a?vt?•+ar?? woo?ro?too? ? san ?s of .s

•

7k r A.?i•r ,. i •...? _.•,y v

•
•
Impact Area EE - Facing northeast along north bank BMP 13
- -. r .?
IMP
-77
.r-?01-
V'tt«?7?"?i'N!• _ x SrR' 3C 'SA .Y ? •?aw '#?' .. r ?'"
- C }.. NAY .r• Fv A ?R1_?RY?'
} ?_3G?Fi ?M? ? . ?'' ?? ^ ? l,•h9, i ?. ai ;? ?* s r 4 'bA rw " d' ? !. a.?JR'+' `FRS ..?...
.t 'l ;.frs ?" ? a ?< t "?Sf•Yp1. ?syw- c.Y.?"t??'p?- *-x'' ?
?, : .? x .d TrM ?. ? l•WO' '` ?~ sr.«e w ,,??r''p ? - S{f,? >, t4, ? S1+r?i.;?? yr°.??-4
't-:'MMy s w ?n`rnr `; `r+ y at,' 4:i?rr tea tE + r .«, `5;, #,? t'L
a , . t? ?'. t,???? ? s.?'.`k"WJ?,?'.'f? r "?_. r'h .?®.. 4P' ?? ? ?, t ..1,f*?^><.k•• 4R * w? ?'?5?_?fa"?.
Impact Area EE - Facing southwest along north bank BMP 13 towards Alignment 6
•
•
•
MAK50C Permit Modification & Keaolution Document
Appendix D
Impact Area HH & PP Details
Page iv
S?G?
0
°
L
N -1-j
Q
J
W w
U J
?° U
LO cf)?
J
Q J
? U
O o
N \ O

O W
TT
Z w
v o
0 LO co
w?
Z
W?
C?
JW
Q ?
0
0
00
ff
O
O
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
O 0
?°
co
0
0
oW Qo

& OW
lO b'd/?V/ 1 N3NVPVY3d , -10000
SONVU-3m
-J0 SlIPY17
dj ? /,
nao
Z3 '0073
0
to
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
O
O
0
O O
O
K)
0
w
? Q
?Z ?M O
J LLj
LJLJ
QL.
LAJ
Ltj OL
LZ
OZ??
??Q
Q ?

0

0
q
----- m N'S OAd „o l
0
0
°o
LO
O
O

u0 4DA@J-?
0 -4-1 0
J
U J
?0 U
((
^
- / LO
J
J
? U
O O
' \ O

O
v
a
? U
L U
0
o° O 60
M O
ok ±
W
?® o
O •i
-? -- __
-40 S1/PV/7
O n8OLS dD& tiz
o «nn
+ e3 I *100
O
O
O
00
N
WLo
Z
J
Q
J
Nb'S'Od„0l
O
O
C\4?
LAjLZ
?o
? o
M
II

mmor7- z

r 1
?J
•
•

,' .?
e
? k
Impact Area HII, PP - Facing west along south side BEQ buildings
Impact Area HH, PP - Facing west along south side BEQ buildings
•

Impact Area HH, PP - Facing northeast along south side BEQ buildings
0
•

MAKSOC Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix E
Impact Area QQ Details
Page v
SEGO
o O
J ?- r p0
p U +
L In N
J
J
? U
Op ?p O
p-
O W N
O V O (n?
LO Ln U) W _ LC)
?j
p
O
ZO
?Q?
0
W O °
O
0
W
Z v
Q
QW?
O •
O
OW ,
O U ?.
W
c? LO
4Z
J
Q?Ww
0
0
0
UOIIDA9 ?
0
0
0
Z J
\?:o
0
oC)
O
N
0
O
0
O
N
O
O
0
O
p
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
-Ln
0
a

0
o

LILJ
0
?, 0
a?
w
J
J
?
O

J
Q J
? O
O O \ O

v
O
Ln
LO
00
?Z? rl O
O
LJ
a

o
?JWoo
WHO +
Q?QL
?W ?
Z??

U ` o
•-
O
1
O
? 1 ? O
co0? c
0
0

+b
co
16
LO

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04 O
f i,-+?
O
O

0
0
to
0
0
N
Itj ow?
Z ? J ? Q O wO
a? O
OW,O co
1
E

uoi}DnaJ-?
•
0
to
•
•
Impact Area QQ - Facing south towards impact area and Pool
0
•
•
•
MAKSQL Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix F
Impact Area DI Details
Page vi
S?.G?

•
•
Impact Area D 1 - From bottom of impact, towards HQ

U
Impact Area D 1 - Facing east down impact zone
c:
•

MAK50C Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix G
Impact Area Nl Details
Page vii

Ln 0
N') Ln
N 0
N O
00 -?Z

7 1
o0'ZZ
L 8 +Z l
1

_ -S
?`doWl 4
vow
b'? _
IV[NO F( v Ij0 Sl WI
00 -?Z

8
? LLSZ

- - - ni Y l - - ? 1
a3,LlI?Vb3d 0 11111 I ? - _ -

09'9 z

I
)9•LZ
I
/ I

? i
I

I

? 8Z

69•LZ
i
I

W 09'6Z

F
I
B

o8 •oS

ol

r? LO

N 0

N

p
00.0
O
Ln
iN
O
0
N
0
Ln
0
O
0
Ln

CO r00
LJLco)Q
Cl) 0 CV)
~?WO
WZQ?O
MZ LL
?QT?
?zZ?
a 00
QCL J cl) cvj
0 T
CLZJ?
mQF'J
W?
N ?.
Ict O rv-
w
o -
II II
0 ow
J
Q
U
V)
O
d-
Z
0 0 0
W cv)
J ?
CD - ? N
co pa-
DO 00 cr w
Z 0?. W
N^ W =
00 O CL w/
?
.>
z 0-
II II ??
V
Z z
0 o tli
J
U Cf)
Q J
T- CL r)
r z
CL0<
?ZJ
QW
0
o
Q
o z
Ln U
0
U
0 W
0 r r1
+ v?
0
9
•
•
0
N N Ln o
00
?Z
-
7 7 11 007Z

- L '8 I+Z l i
, S
N ?d WI 4 b1
O IQ d 30 Si WI
00 -?Z

8 LL ?Z
96 2L+LL :b s
t/dIN-1 ?i /
43ji1 b3,d 0 it Il
i

09.92

X I 99•

9-? 8Z

69'LZ

09.6Z

I 8V

X i
08'0

0

N

ON

Ln

O 00
o?
O
Ln
N
O
O
N
(D
Ln
O
O
n
D
D
D
000 OF °0
W
Jcv)U
r
Q
U.
CV) p I- c)
?- tr W O
Z a- W O
= O
I.1J C) cf)
MZ i
W
Z ?
Q V,
U T
Z cv)
M
?
Q Q W
j
? CL cy)
r Z r
v Q LL:
Z --? _1
cn c)
QWO
cr 3::?
u
N
o O rK
2 W
o-
II II
0 o w
Q
U
V)
0
•d-

• •
•

u
?C
C
I CO
rOK
?
Z ?
Z?
CO Z D
rnr
-i w
CA)
w
?r5
Z
cn m
M>Z
rnr?
z
C)
0
0
C)
D
Cf)
D
0
r
•

a a?.
r

x> j pG

Impact Area N 1 - Facing impact area south from Alignment 3 east bank BMP I 1
rs
•

t
?`?•? ? fit` .?#ai.+?•.',n,?y°'' ?"fi` -
µ
K
Apr`-'*v + i, Z.
Impact Area NI - Facing impact area west from Alignment 3 east bank BMP I I
•
•
•
MAK5OC Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix H
Impact Area P1 Details
Page viii
5r- GI'
O o W a? u
w
J W
U J
?J0 U
J
Q J
? U
^Q) 0 ?o
Qt?
0 a?
Z 0 ? U)
QWL •
O ? II
?Q N
ACC L?
O ? ?. r7 v
c O
C) (Z
Z Z
,WW
O
00
o0
S
uoi4nnal]
O
0

N

+
N Lu -?
? 4
--
?
- - _
=
, - _
- - ---------------
L f)
Q c
- -? -

cai
?
Q
)
o '
H
C -
o0 0
?a
2
`
?-
-
0 SJA17
10VdM 1N3NVkV&3d

O

00
1o
LO
0
0
0
0
W
?L
? v
Q Q
W ?
k u
?a0? O
O
o)
Qp II 4?
O?W LO
0
0
C) 0
N O
N
O
0
N
b
r
D
D
O
0
0
0
0
N
Z J
C) LZ
Q
Q
? Z
m
0 0 0
U
0 Impact Area P I - Facing southeast down grade at impact area towards Armory
•
Impact Area PI - Facing northwest up grade at impact area towards Supply Warehouse
•
•
•
MAK50C Permit Modification 6, Resolution Document
Appendix I
Permitted Impact Tracking Survey and Tables
Page ix
5F
W V < /i
Q m /
?2 zZ
ayy'
J
1
r ---- -------- -- _-
n i - $!-?9f LIG

00 co

ff LL W
C/) Z LL ir
N Z
`r I11 R??G - - LO
Lf)
I
0) 3:
3
- M i
M 4z
0)
co cc
z z

NIx

co I
x M

/
- - - - - Rf LL
.LL.1 OO - - -
CO r?
-
w --
- _
-
j
C cn ? u
((Ili - ,. -Y
s?' -

V!
X cc
Q w
V
3
c?

s
z
LY-
a cc
z
f
> 3 W
Q C) d
cc ir U

2 O U)
W o
T U) X p w¢
w a Q
^
L.L 0
z cz
w
a

C
c .
w
m

/1

c? W
> 0

z
D U

a

L Q
U)
U)
f-
U)
C)
0 W
g Z w U
a a
a- F-
L)
CC
w g
W 3
-
J
o LL
w
a
a _
?- ac[Za

m

C 1-

w
fn
o w a 0c[
Z
-, a H
Q
?

J Z CL
CC U)
- CL Z CL
Q.
cz
?2t
cis
N
Q
N
cz
0 0 0
Qr
v, an ¢cn
.ti
n t O O
CA (4 M
? ? • ` . J 1
-? Lci --`3?
u U
`r ? cc ? N
? CD °C ? 0) cu
N - rr ' c Q
-'c JJ
-- - - t 5
- '??_ r 1 O cU`
CZ jE
Fl. -
.. _- - --?- - - -____- _ _-___-
CIO
``I I J ? 53
I
????I ? ??
I I \ j
I
T N M IT
cC M cc cu
2 2 2 2
Co c? cu
Q Q Q Q
C70U) o
QL
¢ocM0 ~ `V
Q?w w
z¢U)I Q? OOZcc? a
2t
"o? ow Oz?Lww w
1' N a co
CDC) ???1, n wXD?OO >LU CO
CIO
- 1? 1 cn 3 Z w a
Z C) C)
co cr
g U) F
? T QL
r cn v
Z 3- a a a v
?1- ¢ a ¢
--
F- W
----
- - - w cc -i J H
_` - - a
"of = cc z ¢ oc
cz t- ¢ ac z m w
20 ¦¦ ¦ Q? Q o cr w a Q
¦ ow a cr
????o L Z H z w ?+ r
??
??¦ ?¦ w 3 arc
J_ m z a ??
CL
f a
a U I U
u- cc LL a:
Uiz?cnz
\ a1 ?; \ •. L o co
\ . o N
? O O,
U) C,
U- Lo
o ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦10 i ?.'
Q,? ¦
QL
56-
CIO
X., -
\ ? ALIGNMENT 1 CIO
8 \ ?' L
??? ,? ¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦ Q
--------------
0 0 0
?

N I

cz
l
w

f ` N
1 r
y?f\f LL
• [0,m-
ca/)
J°
00
rte, ?
r - i II ? ?J N, n M ?_
LL U-
55--_ - -- VJ I ~1111 L
_ II
Z
M fq rry[
co
U "I' ? \`\ l \?\ III ? 1 f ('??
&D < LL
N N
LL LL ci
ti
IA Ln 3+ I
I _ op pp _ 3e..
a: ir
LL z LL
OA <
h?
11 U'A
g VJ to
?.¢ n¢:
cl) lZ cr) uz?.
I I u] k? _' X
®
lLL°
2Y? -
--
44? I? r I I ?I N O q°
1 cv) M
I
-, --- _ ?EI?NMENT -
NMENT 2 2
' - - -- - -_ - B`- -
N C4 _ !i:----
N
i
U)C[ LL Q
?Z! C0Z
cv)
° °
CJ
Ir \
7
CL
CU
2
ct
a)
C a)
n <
cu LL
?r
OD
L I r
N C7 0
CL CL LLJ
as cis
cc ca cr
cr
w
Q Q a
w
m
r 0
w m
Cl) j U
Z Cn CA IL
J F-
C13 F- Q F-
z 3 Q a
Q W ° o L.L
a
F- a a: Z m cr w
ow a ¢ Q a
3
wz m d
¢ z a ?[!
a
cz
2
Cnt1S ?
W ?-
L? O
Q T
?¦ Q
cz
r?
V
rcz
i
0.
' > (n
I, co M Q
,I N Z
L ?- X ?p
u- Z5
\ Il?l?l ? o
i i 1\HI
\N MIN

M
a-
Scz
L

1
1 I
I
I
I ?
II \ -
? Q\I
I nQ \ _
- I
T i ? >>
r
0 0 0
LL LL
cn cn , . .,
10 lp
v z v z
II II j ?'. P ??
. is
COQ COQ / % /'. ,.j;
x x
LL C-) LL
O m'!;
(0 (0
;.
rn (3i
i

\j
CL

?V
/cz p
LU
?
C
G CL
J
L
`V
m
Q

?

U) w
>

U 11
^^
W
Y
p
Z U) U) d
Cn
p H
Lu H
U U
Q
U
g Z Q 0- LL <

a Q
Q
J p w
H

H
¢ a
m J
Z
co
cc

pw

Z F-
a.
O

?
cc

a

a LU

Z
W
W F
a: LL
u)
- cr Z
N Cl)
(u
2 ? U
c (u Q
ctt LL
W g

Q
(z
fz
Q

wI
Iw
i
SI
a
i
i ,
?°I
i
r1
zLLj elf
//?? ? 0
i
LJ Q LL '
Z \
CK '
W p
1
(If
O
\
LL. JO \
1__L \
L LL
v>> Z CO Z
uj 7 U
--
z Q • cf) o[ a ------------ -_-
?Z ?Z"t
II ' ? II ' U?
?Q O COQ
x") LL xMLL
;
LL ocn LL C) U)
J O v J O M ? •g ,???/
0 00 O) (D T v ol
M r,.
N M N co
N N
LL
N F
(
D
\O? Oo
N 0) M
II ci 11 v /
\ h`O? CO Q (o Q . r
x cc\:)j x N N;
O
LL LL
' V: v
ll?
j i
N
M Z •
U
a
x
LL o
J ?
W W
cc')cC
co MIr
co Z
Z
(0 V
x Q Co U
x Q
N
J .
J N
C! 1,11
(0 O (o O
O O
1{
C\j
46 44
?Z COZ- as
-44
C) N
a
N 0) ..
a
r- LO
CL
cz
9
T
Q i o
QN
- QL
cz - cz
Q U)
cz
0 0 0
i Q )Q
a) C
o S LL. {L -- j
U) CD
F?
00
0?0 M - = I
Q? t
K
^? I ' O vJSl < V/
f H N LL O LL
o? _I , O J
r Y ?n?r
n
CV)
45
\ N
a
-------- ---------------- ------
------ ------------- ----
RAVE:
Q Q U) „ - -
li
? r I _
JI
J
LL M C7 it W V /
U)
t\ O j I z
r (Y)
a Q

m 2
cu cu

Q Q
S
Y Q
o W

w

CL
W
m

0 U
Z
U) U) a
U)
H L)
C) W
? U Q

a cr o LL
F-
W Q J J i-
9
I Q CL Z m W
a ? Q m
o w Z
w z m a

? - Cc Z d
T^^
?.L
^cz
W
L
Q.
cz
V
Q?M0
Q
cz
G
U
cz
co
Q
co
2t
^cz
W
L
0 0 0
N
Q
co
t10
a c Q
L ?
cz
L
W
Y
N
Q-
ccz
G
c z
T^^
2 Q-
cz
Q
(u 2t
V <
Q LL
w cz cz
? I
w - L.. ?-
w ? N
m -
cu _
w ? 2 CL
U) > F?]Cf7, cc
z Q 5
Q U) U) Cl.
o w Q ?a/a
U U ??W^^
W g w 0 LL LLJ
VJ
w 3 Q H
a
? a cr z mmw
0 X Z w 6 w w a
o w a- Z ¢ Q d Q
Z
wZ w
w Z ? w Flu
I? _ w
0 I
U) m Z CL
u
I I I ;
III '?I .
II.
LL l
? @ III I
cr-
o' z
I li - N
u ? Q III 'I
? Q ! o j',I I l
xco:o
LL o
o
-J O LL
U)
Clj p 111 II f?
II I
a• ? III
cz
I
C
LL
LO 16
0 0 0
•
0
n
U
MAK5OC Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix J
NC EEP Receipt for Payment
Page x
5E-Gi
•
NO-
Fco,`(?1??J/rstem
1 i .?G
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
November 4, 2008
John Townson
US Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
Project: Marine Corps Special Operations Command (Phase 3)
County: Onslow
D WQ#: 2007-0245
COE#: 2007-286-067 (10/16/2008 phase 3 authorization)
EEP #: ILF-2008-6535
Amount Paid: $775,930.00
Check Number : 0155603

The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404/CAMA Permit(s) issued for the
above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements associated with
the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
River Basin Stream Credits Wetland Credits Buffer I& II
HUC (linear feet) (acres)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm -Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
White Oak 0 0 2,310 0.47 0 0 0
03030001
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the EEP mitigation requirements in the permit and/or authorization have been
rescinded. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone] or
Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
i
f (:? ago
William D, Gilmore, PE
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Brad Shaver, USACE-Wilmington, Thelma Hemmingway, USACE-Wilmington
Will Breeden, agent (URS Corp)
Bristol Reynolds, Whiting Turner Contracting Co.
File
i RP.StDYt f?... .. PYDt" Our State
IBC OR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.neeep.net
MAK50C Permit Modification & Kesolution Document

Appendix K
US Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit (28 March 2008)
0
•
Page xi
6k G.
• DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
• REPLY TO
ATTENTION OR
CESAW-RG (1145b) 28 March 2008
MEMORANDUM FOR Mr. John Townson, US Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004, Camp
Lej eune, NC 28542-0004
SUBJECT: Action ID: 2007 286 067; Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for Marine
Special Operations Command Complex (MARSOC)TPhase 2
1. In accordance with your complete written request of 9 February 2007, and the ensuing
administrative record, we issued a provisional permit to USMC-Camp Lejeune on 26 November
2007, to place fill within wetlands and jurisdictional streams, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, for the placement of the MARSOC, within the Stone Bay Area, abutting the
New River, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. On 6 February 2008, the NCDENR-Division of
Coastal Management issued Consistency Concurrence for the Fiscal Year 07 and 08 construction
projects for NL RSOC. On 10 and 25 March 2008, we received the mitigation and monitoring
plan for Phase 2 of the MARSOC facility entitled "Road Relocation" dated 21 February 2008.
We are issuing individual permit authorization to cover this proposed Phase 2-Road Relocation.
i 2. Based on the submittal by your consultant, USMC-Camp Lejeune has indicated that a portion
of the mitigation to be impacted, 129 linear feet of intermittent channel, will be compensated
through payment into the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). This compensation is
consistent with the administrative record and receipt of payment should be copied to this office
before work is initiated within any jurisdictional areas.
3. This office has also received an on-site mitigation plan which would restore 1.5 acres of
riparian wetlands and 287 linear feet of stream channel. This proposed on-site mitigation will be
used in combination with payment to NC EEP to adequately compensate for the authorized
impact. The use of on-site in combination with off-site mitigation remains consistent with the
provisional authorization. The North Mitigation Site should be completed concurrently with the
construction of the road relocation covered by this Phase 2 authorization. The South Mitigation
Site should be completed concurrently with the future authorization of Phase 3 (2007 & 2008
projects). Whiting Turner has made a commitment to complete all mitigation prior to contract
completion with the Navy in 2010.
4. The on-site mitigation should be properly stabilized using sediment erosion control best
management practices during construction. The on-site mitigation should be monitored according
to the approved monitoring plan received complete in this office on 25 March 2008.
•
CESAW-RG (1145B)
SUBJECT: Action ID: 2007 286 067; Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for Marine
Special Operations Command Complex (MARSOC) Phase 2
5. If any change in the authorized work is required because of unforeseen or altered conditions
or for any other reason, the plans revised to show the change must be sent promptly to this office.
Such action is necessary, as revised plans must be reviewed and the permit modified.
6. Certain significant general conditions remain and require that:
a. You must complete construction before 31 December 2017.
b. You must allow representatives from this office to make periodic visits to your
worksite as deemed necessary to assure compliance with permit plans and
conditions.
7. You must notify this office in advance as to when you intend to commence and complete
work in regulated areas.
8. This individual authorization only covers the Phase 2 - Road Relocation. Subsequent
authorizations for the remainder of the property will be issued once permit requirements are met.
This office is returning a stamped, approved, Phase map which covers the authorized activity as
• well as the approved restoration and monitoring plan for the on-site mitigation. Should you have
questions, please contact Mr. Brad Shaver, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office at telephone
[phone].
Encl hn E. Pulliam, Jr.
WColonel, EN
Commanding
CF:
Chief, Source Data Unit
NOAA/National Ocean Service
ATTN: Sharon Tear N/CS261
1315 East-West Hwy., Rm 7316
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
0 2
CESAW-RG (1145B)
SUBJECT: Action 101 2007 286 067; Issuance of a Department of the Army Permit for Marine
Special Operations Command Complex (MARSOC) Phase 2
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
• Mr. David Rackle
Y
National Marine Fisheries Service
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, SC 29412-9110
3
C
•
•

n M1
C
_ ?
l1 G x I
4
'
b

U
U Ny ryIM 11
'1 ly ?
,
_ y'u ( S T O N E S B A Y

x ?? u
II 11
_ I u
`?
x 6.
\
Ll4h
JL an
? M it ii 1 Dolphln 11,
o
.
Q I C X11 e
rye North Mitigation Site
Approximate Location of
MARSOC Project

• Lght

??Y]
•
Lrl ? ?.J ? V" v ii
4k x
4 x
y? /b
72x ? `-il /1
b 1
N
Marine Corps Approximate Location of W E
Special Operations Command O Mitigation Sites
(MARSOC) 0 0.25 0.5
Opnpi%,14un Miles
MAR 10 2008
On-Site Restoration Sites
D p elirkarjri202UUv8 USGS 7.5 minute topographic map -
1WIL-FM,OFC- Sneads Ferry quadrangle USACE Action ID: 2007-00286-067
DWQ # 20070245
MARSOC On-Site Wetland Monitoring Plan
1.0 PROPOSED WETLAND MONITORING PLAN
The Marine Corps is proposing on-site restoration of a two riparian wetland areas at the Marine
Special Operations Command (MARSOC) project site, located in Camp Lejuene, Onslow
County, North Carolina. The combined restoration will restore 1.5 acres of riparian forested
wetlands and 287 linear feet of intermittent streams. A monitoring plan is an essential
component of a compensatory mitigation project'. It is the only mechanism by which (1) the
restoration success can be measured, (2) the success can be reported to the interested parties,
and (3) the restoration design can be reexamined and the appropriate corrective measures
taken. A five-year monitoring program is proposed for the two on-site mitigation areas.
1.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The goal of the proposed project is to provide compensatory in-kind mitigation to off-set
unavoidable wetland and stream impacts by the MARSOC project. The mitigation site will
provide a similar hydrologic regime, comparable soils, and similar vegetative communities as
the impacted wetlands. The primary objective of the proposed project is to comply with the
compensatory mitigation acreage requirements within the anticipated US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) wetland permits.
The Marine Corps propose to compensate wetland and stream loss at a-1:1 ratio for the
permanent impacts to 0.9.14 acre of riparian wetlands .and 287 linear feet of intermittent
streams, associated with the Road Relocation and FY07/FY08 phases of the MARSOC project.
The proposed Success Criteria for wetland success will be based on the presence of the three
criteria described in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual' (wetland hydrology,
hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils). Additional Success Criteria are based on the
0 secondary objectives of establishing a riparian forested wetland community that is dominated by
native vegetation.
Objective 1:
RECEIVED
Meet wetland criteria set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual2. MAR Z5 2008
Success Criteria 1:
REGUL,AJ OHy
WILM-FLU OFD,
Achieve a dominance of wetland hydrology, as indicated by the evidence of overbank
flooding.
Success Criteria 2:
Achieve -a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, defined as a vegetation community
where more than 50% of all dominant species are facultative (FAC) or wetter, excluding
FAC- plants.
Success Criteria 3:

Achieve a dominance of hydric soils, as indicated by the evidence of hydric soils within
select soil profiles.
_ MARSOCProject Page 1 of4
USACE Action ID 2007-00286-067; DWQ #20070245 U.S. Marine Corps
Wetland Monitoring Plan March 2008
MARSOC On-Site Wetland Monitoring Plan
•
Objective 2:
Establish a riparian forested wetland community (Planting Success).
Success Criteria 4:
Achieve a diversity of at least four woody wetland plants with a wetland indicator status
FAC or greater, as depicted on the USACE-approved plant list on the mitigation plans.
Success Criteria 5:
Demonstrate a density of planted species to meet or exceed 320 trees per acre at the
end of 3 years (post planting) and 260 trees per acre at the end of 5 years (post
planting).
Objective 3:
Establish restoration site that contains stable slopes and stream channels.
Success Criteria 6:
Achieve. a restoration site that re-establishes the upstream and downstream contours to,
their pre-culvert condition, while maintaining the integrity and stability of the slopes.
Success Criteria 7:

•
Achieve a restoration site that re-establishes streams to their pre-culvert condition, while
maintaining the integrity and stability of the existing and constructed stream channels.
1.2 POST CONSTRUCTION
As-Built Survey
Prior to planting, spot elevations will be taken to ensure that the proposed mitigation plan
elevations were achieved. Within the wetland zones, the As-Built survey shall deviate from the
theoretical plan surface by no more than 0.2 foot.
As-Built Plant List
Plants will be those listed in the USACE-approved plant list as depicted on the mitigation plans.
Immediately following planting, an As-Built plant list will be prepared that lists the name and
quantities of each species installed at the mitigation sites. The As-Built plant list will include any
deviations from the USACE-approved mitigation plan plant list that occurred as a result of a
change order, and subsequently approved by the USACE. The As-Built plant list will provide the
baseline information from which plant survivorship over the five-year monitoring period can be
evaluated.
.imucouu rrglect
USACE Action ID 2007-00286-067; DWQ #20070245
Wetland Monitoring Plan
Page 2 of 4
U.S. Marine Corps .
March 2008
MARSOC On-Site Wetland Monitoring Plan
• 1.3 MONITORING
Initial Vegetative Response
An initial vegetative response will be evaluated in an initial monitoring visit approximately one to
two months following the completion of all planting activities. The purpose of this monitoring is to
evaluate the immediate response of the plantings to their new environment. Qualitative
descriptions of the overall appearance of the vegetation will be documented.
Annual Monitoring Program
A five-year monitoring program will be implemented to evaluate the long-term success of the
restoration effort.
Hydrology Monitorinq (Success Criteria 1)
To document the success of wetland hydrology within the project site, photographs will be taken
that show evidence of overbank flooding. Photographs may depict water in floodplain, wrack
lines, sediment deposits, and/or scour points in the flood plain. One hydrology monitoring visit
will be conducted per year.
Vegetation Monitoring
Two 0.01 acre vegetation monitoring plots will be established at each of the two on-site
mitigation sites (North Site and South Site). The plots will be established on both sides of the
channel. The monitoring points will be marked in the field using either wooden stakes or PVC
• tubing. One vegetation monitoring visit will be conducted per year.
(Success Criteria 2)
Each plot will be evaluated for vegetative percent coverage to determine if more than
50% of all dominant species are facultative (FAC) or wetter, excluding FAC- plants
(Success Criteria 4)
Each plot will be evaluated for species composition to determine if at least diversity of at
least four of the nine woody wetland plants from the USACE-approved plant list on the
mitigation plans occurs.
(Success Criteria 5)
Each plot will be evaluated for species density to determine if at least 320 trees per acre
at the end of 3 years (post planting) and 260 trees per acre at the end of 5 years (post
planting) is achieved.
Soil Monitorinq (Success Criteria 3)
To document the development of hydric conditions within the soil profile, soil borings will be
taken using a soil auger at each vegetation monitoring plot. A description of the soil profile will
be documented. The soil boring hole will also be evaluated for the presence of standing water.
One soil monitoring visit will be conducted per year.
MARSOC Project Page 3 of 4
USAGE Action ID 2007-00286-067; DWQ #20070245 U.S. Marine Corps
Wetland Monitoring Plan March 2008
MARSOC On-Site Wetland Monitorinq Plan
Stability Monitoring (Success Criteria 6 and 7)
• Photographs will be taken to document the success of slope and stream stability at the project
site. Four stability monitoring visits will be conducted during the first two monitoring years, and
then one stability monitoring visit will be conducted during the remaining three monitoring years.
Photograph Locations
In addition to the photograph documentation described above, fixed-point photograph locations,
indicated with permanent markers (e.g., wooden stakes), will also be established that would
best portray a visual depiction of the restoration. Photographs of the restoration will be taken
from these fixed-point locations at each monitoring visit, at the same orientation per location
(e.g., facing north, facing southeast, etc.). These photographs will supplement the monitoring
data as a visual aid for reporting.
Additional Observations
All relevant observations would also be documented during the monitoring visits. These
observations include wildlife species, invasion by nuisance plants, occurrence of woody species
in the herbaceous community, and disturbances to the landscape.
._ 1.4 . MONITORING REPORTS
The results of the restoration monitoring program will be provided to appropriate regulatory
agencies on an annual basis, with a final report issued at the end of the five-year period. The
interim reports (monitoring years 1 to 4) will be delivered prior to the end of the calendar year of
the respective monitoring period. These reports will include the results of the data collection,
• color photographs, a comparison of the current monitoring results with prior data, general
observations of the restoration area and assessment of restoration success, and
recommendations for any corrective measures to be taken. The final monitoring report will
present an overall assessment of the restoration effort and will also present a chronological
summary of all the interim monitoring results. The reports will be prepared in accordance with
the USACE Regulatory Guidance Letter on Minimum Monitoring Requirements for
Compensatory Mitigation Projects Involving the Creation, Restoration, and/or Enhancement of
Aquatic Resources. 3
2.0 REFERENCES
US Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Guidance Letter, No. 02-02. Subject: Guidance on Compensatory
Mitigation Projects for Aquatic Resource Impacts under the Corps Regulatory Program Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
2 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US
Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
3 US Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Guidance Letter, No. 06-03. Subject: Minimum Monitoring Requirements
for Compensatory Mitigation Projects Involving the Creation, Restoration, and/or Enhancement of Aquatic Resources.
August 3, 2006.
MARSOC Project Page 4 of 4
USACE Action ID 2007-00286-067; DWQ #20070245 U.S. Marine Corps
Wetland Monitoring Plan March 2008
U
C
RESTORED WETLANDS
APPROX. LOCATION OF TL PROPOSED STREAM
15 E E%ISTING DOUBLE BARREL I EXISTING GRADE
24• CMP (TO BE REM0VED,
10 5 PROPOSED GRADE
0
0 50 100 i50 2DO 250 300 350 40C 450 500
SECTION A-A'
a'
FL?W 3 £a?
w-ao
EXISTING CDNTOURS
w-Ha w - PROPOSED CONTOURS oil _
E%ISTINC DOUBLE p i
BARREL 24-CM P -••-••- PROPOSED STREAM - 118 L.F. tit
TO BE REMOVED C-
PROPOSED IL C-82 PROPOSED WETLAND RESTORATION - 0.5 0...S
OF STREAM ® w
FLOWIL1\ LOC CR055-VANE iW
6th 4u
POOL '^ ups?
°u
.I J
% PR OS T -11
>OF A EE
<r
1 0 FL 1 ? ? ? ? <o
\, ? / lO I ? ? 1\ u
J ~¢
-? A-301
9 t
GRADING PLAN Ilkn oc I
e?^ ww =P HOOAIZQONFAL SCALE
eP
m01
r -
=a r= W
kL[l'. Sare'bcNue Ca.w Ww Typ Ms. 9me? Rolfalm
!Iw
n
611' mlYei. CovW Y SbuA I1kn Cm?m 66x o.c.
blt' flea Amnenoll Tne IM Caca6a 14ka of
bll' TRe Ike fmYrtv iFhawc
6I1' Awnl:xe Rd le Ts Ike Cmtl4a Ib
611' awimo Tee ;ke Canuoe 14Aeac
611' A?.m lYee ke Cmniee
56' C 6 Tk Tac Ike Cmiwc 14knwc
66' AnN IeWmE Skub 1? Canum bhe ac
6A' MvN Yu' S i.1 ke Commr bket e.c
ArwMro.la (Aen Cme BemEOe 1 f Sea Cmum bke o c
0

•
LOG CROSS-VANE WITH DUCK BILL ANCHOR
SCALE: NT8
zQVl
DEO•TF%TILF
_-- --_._-- -- ?
-
wont
?
i
o
`
? ` a
WE E
zI
BTixo eEU LOG VANE
p
?
ANCHDN ? "

PROFILE VIEW TOP OF BANK T EDGE OF MTFA a $ 1
I O
BM7ED LOB
f BTREN6NIK EXPOSED LAD I
tl
RC eV BOLA DER ?p?

AD VANE
SCOUR
1OLE -

D_

-__
________.•
..
WIRED LOB
I
BURIED LCD -______ N
K Z
u
WO-TEXTILE TOP OF BAM
'
L• I E
MATHI7AL
Nf FOOTFA BWIIIEII
EOBE OF MATER SIREAMIEO I
PLAX VIER
PLAN VIEW
SECTION A-A EEVATION
NOTE: LAD IS HAt10ROW MINI" DIAIETEN
OF 10 IN. LAD 18 BURIED RI NOR OF Y FT.
ON BATH EMIR. ALL STONES V To BE "gyp,
a O
n B LCER 117TH RINI" 2'NES¢ DIMENSION. ? u
__._._.__. -4._.__-_-._ .
w?
K
NAIL BED-TEKTILE
VANE LOD TO LOB
Qp
BAiBc
po. o
oo:D ~
BED-TEXTILE -
MATERIAL GABLE
BILL
OUCL DEO-TEKiILE
MATERIAL y
N
-
?? AtVER ALLWIW 'W' 1001
M ALL
cnoeB SECTION VIM

is
•
MAK50C_ I ermit Modification & Kesolution Document
Appendix L
MARSOC Cantonment Project Area Wetland Identifier Exhibit

•
5F.Gi
Page xii
•
•
0
•
•
•
MAK50L Permit Modification & Resolution Document
Appendix M
Sedimentation Tracking Survey and Table
Page xiii
SEGO
•

a
a
LAJ

J

Z _
?
•
Y 1°
U a
Q >
am
L
,
V
Q 5
d a
C
L
•
« O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L ? m
E a
W N
° 1
>
E
a
.p
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
c
v Q
d ,O O O O O O O O O O
E
`w
°
O O O N ? N O q ;
a
w m
E a
E
m a
d

C
O1
Y+

? O
m
Q
0
0
0
o
n
Io
o
M
M
E
`w
c ,o 0 0 o M a ? o ? ?

E
v
6 N a 111
O O O O O O O O O
m Q
a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
w
a
o O o 0 o O O o 0
a
c
m

« u
3 m
c
`m ras
$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O.
OC N
0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q
1+

° O O O O O O O O O
0
0 0
0 o
0 O
0 o
0 m
0 w
0 a
4 in
0
m
N
>
y O O O n m
N
W ?t
n O
m
N .'1
? n
M
!?
E
`u
° H 11i a vi
9
C O O O d N N O a Q
!0
W
3
«
m Q O O O O O O N N

`m
n
' Q
? 001 1?0
a ? N
n W
m O
a O
g
z
C
O
N .: e+i ri oo v
N v
N ?

N g

N
Z
O O O a N N N 1011 N

V Q O O O O O O N N
W
r+
i o .

a .

.? N

n N

m tn0

m 000

1n n

o1 ti n
M
^?

N N m N m
H M
N m
N Vl m
O
H OD
?y

= A
d ?
F
'
y
A Q
?''
6
O
X
=
Y
m
m O1

f 9
y
,r'
CL E E
a

v
z m'
E a 0 0 0 0 0 0

LL O)
° >
E _ 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr
m
3 ?
m
E Q
d ? O O O O O O
E
v
a
> o m a o n n
v m
" E a
E
m a
v

N
01
N
01
0
N
N

C ? j
m M M
?+
E Q
C N t O V g
M
y
E
w
a M

m

Q O
O
O N
O
O N
O
O 0O
O
O N
O
O ?M?}}
O
C
a

v
1:
`w
a
a
Ol
M
m
O
O N
O 01
O O
O ?Np
O ??rpp1
O

c o 0 0 0 o c
3 m
C
N

d
K Q

SS

H O N

Oat

b O ID

tM0
N IO

lM0
N
0o
0 m
0 1°o
0 Oo
0
Q O O O O O O

E
a o v
a ?
Io o m
0 M
0
N ri v a

m Q 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
>
?
01 O O O N N N

E
`w
°
11 N
v N
e Y1
e
?
C O O O ? O O
A
d
!' Q O O O O O O
3
°P
?
n

C Q
? O O O N
?v11
v N
I?i1
o N
1O1n
a
O
Z
O
O O
O O
O O
C? Q
O
Q O O O O O O
d
E
6

N o 0 0 0 0 N°

V
O A
? W N
A
C)
f
Q
Ol Q Q CC m _N
? y
__ E
d E
a
m

•
D
W
r
?/. Z
O z
a o
W
N
a
Z C
C
C
Y
• ?
U
Q co
ac co
H
U >
Q ?
a ?
cc
w
w
CL
•
a- 0 0 m 0 O o O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 o O o o °m
E c
N
..
W N
a >
E o 0 m
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d
m o 0 M
n M
n
C?
E
m Q
d
d O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o O o O O M
m O O M
m
M
b co
E
a
N
> O O O O O
d
N m
d n
O o b
Ot
M N
d
N ?0
N
N M
N d
m o O O O O O o n
N
N Ot
N
tp
-
a J
d m N N
E a
E
m a
v

y?

++
o
O1
M
0
0
0
0
0
o
N
N
o
0
0
o
c
o
M
?
m
n
o
o
o
o
O
o

C
w
r ?
3 m N N
?+
E
`w Q
c o m
? o O o
N w
d n
O . I
N b
M rv
d b
N M
N d
00 o m
? w
n o o o o n
O
N T
N
E
d
a

j

O

O N
M
O o
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O 0
O
O .+
O
O a
O
O o
O
C o
O
O m
M
O ni
.-1
.-I
m Q o O O O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G
Q
N
>
a
? o O O
M O O O O O O O O O O O O
? N O
M n
? O O N
O
n n
M
m
`w
a
O
O 8
O N
O 8
O O
O o
O o
S o
O o
O o
S O
S O
S O
S 8
O 8
O tD
.N-? Ot
O T
O N
O 8
O p
O 00
nn1
a
C
Q O O O O O O O O O O O o o O O O O O O O o o
3 tO
,?,
4

K a
?

N o 0
? 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o n
N
N N
N
d N
00
M m
d o 0 4 n{pp
O
b
pq
0
O
0
t0
0
O
000
S
0 0
o
0 0
O
0
S
0
S
0 8
O 0
°
O 8
O p
o
o o
S
O o
.M- m
N
0 m
m
0 ?o
M
0 0
p
0 o
p
o n
ea

a
Q
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o a
o
x
a o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o d b o o m
o d' M a6
.r

?+

.;
8

° pp
O o
°

O
O o
S vi
S
O o
°

O 0
S 8
O 0
°

O 0
O

O o
p

p m

?O ?n
a

O o
°

o 0
o

o 0
p

O o

p
o m
o

o o

p
o .+

n
° of

C
ei
m
a Q C O O O O O O o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 o C O G O
N
O o o p o ° g O ° o ° O o a o o ° o m o m r?
`w
a

-Q
C n
q

O O

O
O M

O b

d
N n

n
N O

N
O N

O

S N

N
O O

N
O N

N
O .-?

N
O n

l0
O

S
O O

o

S
O O

O

O O

O
O
d
rl

O
O

O
d

1O

ey

v Q o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 . O o o o O N
3
m
1O
_n
C' a" n
n o o m
u? d
°n rv
.M+ ?c
m o o m
m M
w n
m o
m a
m o 0 0 0 0 0
vO1i w
d m
n o?
n

C
O M O N

N N
o
N
O
If1
Z
n
m
O O
O

O M
.-1

O b
d

N N
00

N O
N

O N

O
S N
N

O O
N

O N
N

O H
N

O N

p
O N

d
O O

O
O O

O
O p

O
O o

O

o N

N

o O

o b

M

N m

tp

N
a Q O O o O O o O O O O O O O O O O o o 6 6 6
d
E

N

d n

n O O m
d

1 y

O

n N

M

M lD

m

m
c

a
l0
O

m

n
M

M

N
m

n

M
O1

O

N
N

n

O
n

n

N
O1

O

O

O

O

M

N
n

0

d

N

N
00

'y

M

N M O N
N N rrf N Nj ?
N
a
o?
u
y a

>

;

r

g

a

ct

o

N

m

T

N

00

D

ld7

n7

_

:°
o
°
E
U
L E
a

MAK50C Permit Modification & Kesolution Document
5FGI
• With regard to the following sedimentation mapping exhibits, please note, the exhibits imply that
sedimentation extended out to the limits of all the wetland features. However, this is not the case for all
areas. For example, A3, on sheet V-2, sediment did not cover the entire shaded area, but the area did
experience the effects of sedimentation. These maps were prepared for the sole purpose of illustrating
the locations where sedimentation and restoration occurred. To prepare exhibits that illustrated the exact
limits of sedimentation would have been a major undertaking. The endeavor was economically
infeasible and could not be prepared in a timely manner. Please, consider this when evaluating the
maps.
•
•
Page xiii
I_ A JNr :Aa Pe*e43 OOSbdw - 1 b d M 3

b
?
b

dMa •Aa lUN@?Q
JNI>I:DV ll l?bdWl 1 S

TiOT-9 ?'OM 7fM>51n MIL
'
our 'tiuuaaulbu3 Nema1S "o ua111 U
0U1111
?opd 7nu471m N+eU p?l4l a pau6lsse you 1-a-11111 -os1?egm 1auw
o?
Aue u! pa6ue
O to '
'

uY '8100

009=.L •918 Wb3b1S/aNb?13M

7?
£ a Z 9 SdHd
o
z "?
+
ef'6T6 r

?LO•?E•6T6 1 4
pa!)I
pow
pa!UOO a4 ua IOU aae Aay1 aul
'6uljaaul6u3 3iema4S Jo NJad OJd aye ulewou 0e45 pue smel 740u
Gyadwtl la4)o pue Iytiu,ldoo w pa(4ns aue nayl asn awp-auo

:ON lea

14060 :ON P81OJd

£ 1191 HX3

0
a j
10912 AN HSI3WN
oor awns
13mus TnL%3LL3AVi M, JoJ papualw a:)Imas leu Ulssa)wtl jo sluawruisul ale out
'6uljaaul6u3 yemaa n aledaid uo e7i cads pup 'stiu!mejp
salt' uaindwoo 6ulpnlOul suojejooj o pue sluawnoop IN 900Z©
0 0 9
_
0Nr :As Pe*)oJo 0MAVw
z
n - Ili V M 3

d MN

?' 0 ?uau?n
Is t?e?d 5NIXDV it iOVdWl IS
Isol-? ?'OM 1/Ni,[l rmJ

? _?, bu„aaU, 6UI, III IU n7 "
IUl7u 7n NL 6,,,
eO P-0y7 a o7
yoaAOnaIIosILLI
aaUauUeu,
VYV3b1S/GNVli3M
W00'dYFiM?MM'7NMM
o o:
A
Aue M ul p a6ueyo o'pa,7lpow 'pal ' aooo yl
P I aq 07 7ou aj aye e a
'DUJ
'6

O`/U? a?eQ ? ???`

{` 7
?+*R Z ` ? 3SVHd

2 LSLY'OBE'6T6 J
OSLY'OY6'6T6 L C
u 4
51J
uuaaulbU3 >reMa75 )o Auatloj0 ay7 ulewa !!eys pue smel 7y 0u
j
pep pue 7 o
A
N aoaa yl asn awq-auo
o7 7oa
aoe Aa
apu
a7u

O H
:ON a IF W60

PWOJd

I
IH
(
3

J
To9LL,?,'Heirm
c ON, ??
f
s l
jw
p
?uj
iemajS Aq pareuad um7eoje0a UOjj7o s7uaw aUe
nq ypaos pup ' s6u!mpip
'tiu,,aau
l6u3
lr
'-II7 ?.Inclw.o bu
n
a
,
/?
I AMLL5 3T11A31L3AVJ TL? !p
pul suogeI-j o PUe s7uaunnoP IIV r90oz
0 0 0
?'_n Mr :A8 pe*pega OM MY
a? 7a dMa :?BuMe?o JNINOVb l11?ddWl

OWLIt :alga
zm=.I :-IBS Wd32JIS/GNVi3M
£18 Z 'L 3S`dHd
:ON Iea *1069 :ON P9fWd £ 1181 HX3
j i I I I 'l? I I I I I i I l I I I i i
12l1?M31S
'0u7 'DU!-u!6u3 uema75 )o uolssl wjaD ua771?.
0 T201-0 VON "Mon Ww" A0uo Inogllm A77etl p71g1 a o7 paublsse 7ou 7anaos7euM Jauuaw
lyap• .MMM Aue u! pa6uew 70 'Pahl pow 'paltloo aq 07 7ou we Aagl -oul
? '6uI7aa dU3 uema7S to AuaoOm aql uleww pegs Due smel 7gbl;
Z ZSLi'OBE'6T6 J Auadw
OSL9'OBE'6T6 1 laylo Due 714b11Atl00 o7 Pafgns we Aayl 'asn a7-auo
T wl
X04 pap" w.1 aollas feu 01ssalo?q J. S7uawn11-1 w*U
OlLZ A 'F19I3TVy 'buuaaul6u3 ueMwS Aq paJetlaw cope
Il j]an5 Due 'S. qOU, p
O` L0? 'sally ja7ntlwoa 6u!Dnl:ml su opemal e:? pue sluaw nnop IIV :900LC
it lm7ie3T1UMLLa.IVA TZ? Q9
8
W

U g w

O
O

0
NN
W ~
r
V

8

Nt I I -
rl,) (n
Q N
U
W
Z
U i , ll .,

V r n
Iz CD o W
LL- < LL
O LL-
n-- ?- Q
I rn r_ ?
0 0
V-A `JNr :Aspo*"o
31LIP :a18U ,ooL=.L :aleos
:ON lea tiL06J :ON Pe"d
oos8vvy
JNINOV'Ji iOVdWl
Wd32US/aNVi3M
£'8Z'13S`dHd
£ 1181HX3

O I11VM31S
_DUI
l?
3 i.ema'
u s
ao

Q
p
TipT-o row ifN7JZl Wy)W lg
j
2 p
!g
u UeD
ouU In
Aped pjlga a of o? au 6isse y. ou ?anaos?e m ?aueu.
M?'a1NVAAWWMMM ui
Aue uI pa6ueyD Jo 'paid pow 'pajdoD aq 01 7ou ale Aaql :)U,
°
Z
ZSL$'OBE•6S6 J
S
'
' '6ul,aau16u3 3lemalS do A»aaad aqa ulewaJ pegs Due smel ?q6u
A.Ijadoud Jagjo pue ?g61jAdOD 04 IDaf ns aje AO
q yl 'asnawp
auo

o 0
L$
06E
6I6 1
I09LZ 3N'H913 H -
?o? papua?ui
s ?euolssa?wd J. s?uawru7sui aye DU7
'

OOf nifIS jS
6w?aaui6u3 vema?g Aq Aq pa-daltl uogcayuads Due 's6ulme?u
'
Q
a
133HIS 3 1LULMVI 1:Zf Sall) ?a?ntlwoD 6uipnpni suogepoleD Due sjo-,op ITV :90020
O
N
W
8 y..1
0

x w II
z
0

L.7

0 0 0
JNr :AS p@T^o
9-A wa o,N,,.p dMa :As Lwma
0LWjl :eiea ,ooL=.L :91e3S
- :ON lea 14060 :ON lid
JNIiiOV8i iOVdWI
M38 11SKINVU3M
£'8 Z `L 8SVHd
£ 1181HX8

121t/M31S
O w] '60uaau16u3 yemaag 4o uo!ss!wjaa uaU!im
U Z90T-, f•? 7?IIX1I1 ?? loud Iooq11M Alied pjlql a of pau6isse Jou JanaosjegM Jauuew
y?•„UMM.MMM Aue ul pa6uego ?o 'paiJIpow 'paidoo aq 07 ]ou aae Aagl ?ou[
'6u!uaau16u3 yeMajg 40 Ayadold aq u!-, pegs oue S-1 3(4b"
Z S 'K6 / Ayadmd jagjo pue 4g6ljAdoo 01 ?oalgns aje Aagl •asn aw
OSL9'06E'6T'6i6 1 n-auo
I09GI JN NqI3M1 '-I papu-'ul ao?nias !euo,ssa,.,d Ao s7uaw n??sui aye 'cur
L
' '6uuaaui6u3 yemaas Aq pa
it jedaitl uoge?Upads oue 'stiu!Me,p
o0? 311ns 'SaIU jaindwoD 6u1pnpu? suope!n?!ea pue sluaw nu op IIV 100LO 133His 3mL 3LL3AV! IZf

8
w
W ?
0 0 40
9_n JNr :As pepan 0MI V w a j b d M 31 S

?l

dMa .A9 UIV1eJQ JNIX DV' Ji -LOVdWI

U
T10T-D =*ON fl M '6uuaaw s S uolssim auuew
jouo p ed ea pjlql a pa
u61s6?sse you j aegey ?auuew
pa

VYV
- Woo.euw-ZAL%*yw?r'MMM Mr Aua ul ul pa pa6ueyo jo 'P a?ylp
ow 'paltloo aq 04 o> jo >ou aye Aayl 'our
32 1S/GNV
1 18M /?
'
' '6uueau16u3 yema7S To Ayiadwo ay7 u ewal pegs pue smel ]y6u
Ol/L!4 :pled ?M W ??. ;? 71 `
E'SZ ?S V/Hd ZSLY
OiE
6T6 J
(
OSLO'OK'676 1 J
' AUa ojd jay]o pue ay6uAdou of pafgns We Aayl asn awq-auc
poi papualul --W s Ieuoissaiolo P swaw uasu .,e D.1

:ON;ea
IrW60 :ON lid
E 1181 HX8 T09LZ JN
H!)BW'!
°0t ? '6uuaaul6u3 yleMa4 Aq paje6aid uupeoppaos pue'sbulmeip
sale a ntlwoo 6u pnpui suopelnuicn p- s?uawnoo

a
133hiS TMA 113AVA TZV p w 900ZO

r ,....

1,1?
C0
is 0 6
L- JNf :A8 Pe?pe4o
` oN &W ALa dMN :Ae umw(]
0l/LIV :0180 ,004=.4 :91809
- :ON IOU 44069 :ON POlOld

1bdM31S
J N INOVdl lObd W I ui 'bu,JaaU,bg3 3 pma,S,<> uo,ss,w ao ua,,,,m
TfOT-0 l•OM mown MTI1r loud FUoga,m Aped pj,qj a o7 paub,sse Jou Janaoslegm Jauuew
LD 0
Wb3 ZIlS/aN`d?l?M -? 6 ? Aue u, pa6ueytl o 'paylPoui 'pa,doo aq 01 IOU ae Aayy Dui
'6upaau,6u3 yemag 4. Ayiado,d aql u,ewa, pet's pup sme, 4q6,,
2 ZSLB'OK*6T6 1 Auadad Aayao pue 1t'wAdoo of paf ns We Aa
£'g Z`L ?Sb'Hd 05LI'OK*6T6 1 9 yl'asnawp-auo
v T09LZ JN INDEr VN '6 1o) p Wel a leuoiss Jo scup al u mein
{? g [['?j yy,?. uuaaul6ug u3 uma?S Aq nq pa?euad Uojj uoppjypads atls pu 'sbul mejc
L 11 G' -'? r ",: d 1-33k11e MfA31 O71yau? 'sal,/,a]ndw- buipnl,u, suoi)eln,le? pup s?uawn,op IIV 90uz

W
U
U?
a
Ix
J

I?
4
o
0
it
U
0 0 0
0
6-A JNr :As per"o
:ON a*wa dWJ :AS umeja
0?iuv :8190 ,006=.L :e190S
- :ON 191 'K060 :ON P9(OJd
30SHM
JNINOV2Jl1OVdNI
VYVD?I1S/0N` -ll3M
£'8 Z ' L 3SVHd
£ 1181HX3

i r
1bdM31S
d
o T"T-3 PON 38mion trii+
L9 UmW&M-&"L%mW
z ZSLY' 616 ^
05L8'O9VBC'6T6 L L `J
109LZ ON 'H9BWW
0 0or nuns
it 1332115 3TTIA3113AV3 It*
P-'
`ou[ '6uuaauibu3 uema7s to uo -.,aa -q-
.opd 4no421m A»ed p?lgl a of pau6Isee 100 Aanaoslegm lauuew
Aue ui pa6uega uo'papi pow 'pa!doa aq of aou we Aagl •aul
'6upaaw6u3 pemaas jo pjaowd agl u!ewaj logs Due smel 7gbj.
Auadwd Jaq]o Due Ig6laAdoa of faafgns we Aagy asn awp-auo
104 papuami eD"as leuolssaAoja jo s4u-1sui aje aui
'6upaaui6u3 JJemaIs Aq pajedaid vogeappaas pue 'sbulmeip
'sap ?al.dwoa 6ulpnloul suopejnaiea oue sauawnaop py :900Z9
0 0 10

0 ? _ E)Nr :AS Pe)PO40
:,, ew,wo dM8 :Aa umeJ(3
OL/L/1' :8190 ,OOL=.L :0I80S
:ON JeN K060 :ON P9(OJd
JNNOV8l iOVdWI
AV32i1SKINYU3M
£'8 Z ' L 3S`dHd
£ 1181HX3
V
>OW
u

p 111VF M31S
"ou
'6u
6
)
paaui
u3 7AeMa)5 )o uolssiwjaa uauum
1901_0 rON 29NIon mmu ,outl )nogmm Nped pAiy) a o) pau6tsse Jou ,anaos)2gm jauuew
V'8U M.I?/M?'Ir1/11M
XJMWA
AV Aue ui pa6ueyp jo 'pal)lpow 'pa!dop aq o) )ou aje Aa41 DUI
Z Z
E'
J '6ujlaau?6u3 ?ema)g 1o A)ladwd ay) u?ewap Ile4s pue -e? )y6i?
S
OSC2'OK'616 1 Auatlwd ,ay)o pue )y6ijAtlop o) pafgns aje Aag1 asn awq-aua
1O9LZ A 'HOW i X01 papua)ul Alas jeuoissaAad )o slua adws w)sui a'ue •puI
'6ujjaauj6u3 NemajS)g Aq paretlaid uooepyp?pads pue 's6ujme?p
u
o
a Oft 313f1s
1332115 3TIIA3113nj 1L1 'salt' ja)ndwop 6uipnpui suoa)ejnaje pue s)uawnpop IIV u9oo j
0 0 0
A JNf :As pe**go 0MIdW
:a+ a dM21 :A8 era JNNVO li iOVdWl

M/Ub :e1ea
.om=.L :01" WVE)?JiSKINYUAM
£'8 Z ' L BSVHd
oN1ea VL06EJ :ON d £ 1181HXA

waa.ulf/ a7JUIlr', _?.
1ViM31S
o •o u7 '6uuaaul6u3 yi eiuajs jo uolsslwjad uaalij.n
U 1101•3 "ON MSM rl km+ 'oua lnogllM Aped pu144 a 07 pau6lsse you JanaoS)eIIM lauuew
y?p•bN-iM11M1?•I11M1M Aue ul pabuego uo 'pal)Ipow 'paldoo aq ol jou aje Aagl oul
'6upaaul6u3 7?eMa?S 40 Auadwa aga uleww pegs pue sMel ag6lj
2 MWIDW616 J Ayadwd Jaglo pue ig61jAdw o7 7aa[gns we Aagl asn aw
OSLB'OB6'6Z6 L u-auo
S09LZ DIM 'H 1o4 papualui aopvas Ieuolssa?oid jo Swawwisul aje oui
V
'JQ1YN '6uljaaulbu3 ueMaaS Aq pw eaaad uopeoypads pue 's6ulMeup
OOY Uins 'sallj lajnlwoD buipnlaul suoiaelnuleo pup sauawnoop IIV ?90OZOO
a J33iLL5 3TMULL3AWS iii

Z [-A 9Nr :A8 P9V940
&*,.,a dM8 :Ae Um9J0
06/U1 :9190 ,006=.6 :816*s
:ON led 16069 :ON POWd
.
ONINOVb Jl l0bdWl
Wd32ilS/4NV113M
£'8 Z ` l 3SVHd
£ 1181HX3
c!)1bdM31S
00
L.
Q
l?
V /
U
W (_0
= O
U -4zt
? ut '6upaaul6u71,emaI5 jo uassl-d uaul0m
O+ T9pT-? ='ON ?fM7?n FIT jolid inogliM Abed PANT a 01 pau6isse'0u Janaos7eLIM ?auueu,
Aue ul pafiueg0 jo 'paylpow ' aldw
WOy0116y181Mq/•INMM aq o] o aye Aayl '-I (?D o '6uuaau!6u3 y?eMalS yo pad o0tl aq ye ulewaj pegs pue smei 7y d,'
Z LSLB'OB£'6i6 J Auadwd ?a410 pue ly610Ado0 oa j0a(gns aie Aayl asn awp-auc
OSLB'OBf'6I6 1 004 papuaIul a-as leuolssaiojd 40 sluawn lsul a0e Du,
S09LZ JN H9L31VM '6uuaaul6u3 ,ema?S Aq pa0edajd u0ge0quads pup 'sbulmeip
o OOr 3uris 's JLJ'amdwoo 6ulpnpul suopelnule0 pup sluawn0op lly :900(,00
a` 133riLS 3nLk LL3AVd In,
1
- 8
U ? w II
0
g

r

Q
C?
U Ln
W 0
= O
U r--
l
n
• 0 0
CI-A

off
a dM2! :?(gwue?d JNINOV2lll?ddWl

r

MIL/V :3160
,006=.1 :01009 WV32JiSKINV
i3M
£'g Z ' l 3S`dHd
:ONMA 11060 :ONPskud £ ilBIHX3
f T I

8
L Q
Q Q
0 LL- C)

C) Qo
U Lf) W N
W Qo Z 00
U N
C) r? ?
N
Q
C,
Ln
Q
W ?
?z
oQ
O -'
w
o ?
o Cf)
w?
00
z ?--
Q 12ldM31S
O 'out 'fiuuaaul6u3 y""S'o uoissiw?ad ua
T90T_D ?•? 13b11 ?? joud 7noy4lm Abed pllyl a of paublsse jou janaosleym jauuew
ypp• M Aue ul pa6ueyo uo 'pagpow 'paldoo aq of lou we Aayl 'oul
'
z z ZSLB'08E
'6T6 I 6uuaau16u3 l+emals to N1adwd a p uleww pegs pue smei ly r,
OSLQ'OBE'616 1 Aliadwd Jagjo Due ly6ljAdoo 07 loa(gns are Aayl asn awlj-
auo
T09LZ ON'H!)2WH '6 JO! papualul IaDl-s S Aq Ieuolssalootl J. sluaw nu ale ou;
uuaaul6u3 Lemals ey pa?etlad uoy eogpads PUP 's6ulme? p
e
o
a oof minx
1331!15 3T11AUIIWd TZY 'sale Jalndwoo 6ulpnloul suopelnoleo pue sluawnoop IIV 9
ORO
Arm

0 0 0
• •
0
0
9 [-n JNr :As Pe)pe,4o
:oH dMa :As wimp
O6/L/ti :area - :ales
- :ON lea 46060 :ON POfOld
LLI a w Z w Z
o O
0- D
CL ZC] ?X0O O
Iwvzo?
(UZ QmFQ 0 JQ?'. OU
ZO <<ix WZO?w-
?0 >- 0 C14aOW
w a F-m a??
0
0
?0 QUO Wm -w 2F-
0 w O NU lIx? ?(n
ZW tnVOf OZ wat%3wm
0cc ZOZ- ma LLJ z
a Q? ?o
?0 9c?m<< -J m
z Z OWOSW °z°W`"?(n
Om LLJ ?waw5 30QOO ?Q?-
00 'L`''' mm< LLI zzOwz NQ=
Qw =30 l o: <F-MW wax
ww
o? ww<z0 a?Ix LLJ
z
00 (n (n Z w 5m 0
?a Imo (a!1?wu=i Q?
ui
0
LAJ 00
IX >°-
a 0 LA- w v rn -i LL- ?QU Z? JZ Z O
w 0 2F-0 ZU?'UxaQm
C) mwoa< }? 06
N
zQIX 00U wwQ0p1`0o
w2i2 P: co Dui o Q N
U) Q x oz Z W6 jr
QV)ap
w- UQN QW Of
Whiz oww ?LNwwmWww
0 m w?? ??m?aZam
? 0Q ? wZa?oa
W o 0~ N = (n X wM cn??P Qaw(wi?
ZU DOS m=oi ?_
O k'aQoo ?wo Z dzw?pow
Z wL]?O wo<z m J pOJ?woOa
W N?Oo
S?m?U
Q r-Qo Qaz ? n? m
m?Qz 0 O owwi° }0?F
W w 0° a6< CL 00<<U)(-)o
z NZwm SwF w000:OwxwO
`D N Nj
0 0
Q a a
0 0
w w w
m
0 0 0
z z z
a a 0
o
a a a x
2 M, m U ?-
C-)
w w w n a
V) W
V W Q Z O
6 L
iV?I F U<
Q Q Q Q
a m
W a a a 0a I a
W
J
" """"
lb dM S
3 1
'
J N Iii O V2J i i W I p? ouI
6u!jaau!6u3 uemalg lo uolss!w ad ua?I m
T90Z'0 l•ON 7lM701.1 MyTJ Loud 7noyl!m /geed pggj a oa pau 6isse Jou Janaosgeym Jauuew
Wb'? b1S/d N`d?13M
o UWrftW-4MWAWrwfr Aue ui pa6uey> >o 'paljIpow 'pa!doo aq oa you ae Aayl _?uI
'6

z
LSLV'OK'6T6 A wiaaul6ug Nemaas jo /gjadojd ayI u!ewa) pegs pue smel ly61i

?? z ` ?SdHd
OSL9'0K'6T6 1 AUadwd jagPo pue 7y6ijAdoo of Pafgns aje Aagl -asn awg-auo

lo

_ v 1091.z A'HE)BWM I pu:j Ml ao! ed d UOOIo sauawruzsul we
-jul
'6ul?aau!6uq uemaIs Aq Aq paja?etla?d oq u?!jpads pue 's 6uimeA
e?

a
00? inns
133WS 3nL%3i13AVj in, p
's IU jalndwoJ 6uipripul, suol)elo,leo pue s-u'-.p IIV :9002 9
a?
rn
c
m
a.
w 0
C >,
m N ?
E `F 0-
E
o
m
U E
m
m U
a
rnw
a; a>
.T z
a
U 0
.0
0 0
0 0
N (n
G o o
o ' o
20 oo
J
w S?
J 'OE
Q Q
F"-
z Y3
O °

r-r
CL m0
a
£

? ? ~
w O

? m J
Q
w
C °C m m
Y
(L
..
Q z N
w g
c U.
T-i w ?
£ E o
u') c b
Q Z N

L Q
a -

a

Q U
=C .
O)
3 w m = o

L L
U w ?
ea ` ' (D
a• • o ti
r--q c m
m m

0 0
z3 )
w
CL
co
0 0 0l0
0 0 0
N
O ? co
r-
N
O O o
(D 00 _
M ?
C) lA
4 w
J
J
Q
z
O
z '-'
O~
H Q
F-
U
OJw
U
Q
°w
w C)
Q Q
2O' w
U)
? Q
O W
U
cl?
a
Z
m m
io m
N ?
m m 0 0) 0) 0
m
a
o
a
o-
C a
m v) m
C D 0 Q 0
c a
!
'c N
0
U d)
U m U U
U
m
m?mm
c
c c
7S a) 's d) c
m -2 'S

m
c c m N c c c m
a 0 a 0_ a 0 a 0 v
L L
c c 0 C
0 c 0 c
16
U w o w U w O w 2
L
v
L 10
C

0 0 0 0

0

? J
r ... N ? (D
?E co o L6 o
(
D M M
0
d i ^
00 (D
N
c U.
d J
C
0) R
0 N C'i
o u>
rn
?
C
N
U.
a 0)
T` -
r-
.
L .0 N
r- cli
O O co (14
O. M
j co 0) co
It a) M ti co
O
m
3 ?
_u
-

= 0 0 0 0 0
m
c
z°
c
m
E
m
>v

0
c°
m „
?
m
N C
0
m
m m
y w
G
a Cl)
Q IT Cl) ? a3
0 0 0
L ?, _? DNr :As r??euo oosadw ? l b V M 3 1 S
?•v JN I?i?t/bl l?b'dW I "out '6uuaaui6u3 Uemals )o uolssiwlad uaAum
:OH B11NNB1Q d/Y\O •?8 ?Q T90T? 'ON 7SNiJI7 WMId loud "°e °lnogAm Nled p1141 a of pau6isse lou lanaos7e4M lauuew
d WOY6YiMaDrl• WVU I pa6ue4o >o 'pailipow 'paidoo aq of lou aje Aagy oul
WVDH-LS/aNVl13M
8 z MWOHE'616 d 6uuaau'd 6ug lallemals to Allad aq1 n uIewa, ajpegs pue smel -auo
0l/Uti : lea - :elms ( Alladw leglo Due ] Nas to .1 loa(gns ae luaw'asn awnauo
O Z 1. 3SbHd 709LZ 0S[8 A '08E'6T61V11 1 J
'HEJLi lo) Wpualw DIe lold )o swawru ale -aul
- 0 e 0 004 31105 '6uuaaul6u3 yemajS g Aq l Aq paledwd etlad uoneopuads Dua e 's6uimejp L3AVI el
N 1 d t, W6J :ON;Je(aud £ 1181 HX3 SaIJ lalndwoo 6uipnpui suale no eo p- s7uawn?oD IIV 900ZO
o. 1331115 3l1lA31oov a ns IZI,
a
Q a
c Q
C
CA 0) a) N N N 0) N N C L
OJ O m ? a) ? a) 'O N a) a) a)
C C m O m m a) O O O O
Q m ma m m (0 N m c0 ca m C6 c c r_ c
c c (n U U c c° N cn a U) a a a a a ? a a Q a c -0 m 0 0 >, >, > .o o cn o U U U Q) GO U) U c U)
d m m m m >, >, >, c >, > > °-
E m c C c L) u c c c c Q fl io
a o o
. 0 0 0 Lr- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 lr_ o
0 0 0m m m m 0 0 m v
m m m om m m m
v v E E am m 0 0m
m m a) (D €€ a) m ate) a) w N N ate) 0) o)
°€€ Qa0 U U U €v U U U oU U U €ci
0 d) a) di ai
cc cc a a) d) a C4 a d) °) °) •°? c a; c di a) 0 ai a)
J o
d) cb d) a) ai 0 a?m m d) o a) d)
co m 'm c c c E 'a E 'D E"D E a m E"o E v E? E v a . 'c co a-:
Q m 0 0 0 c m o c E c E c m E C
C? Q Q U n U a') U n U aQ Q U maU aU aU n Q U aU aU aU o CO U aU a) 6-0 o Q U a
z
o
O U
0. Q. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0
O c
? _
f-
; LL
CO J
LU .- Q 0) `- Cn
O O O O O O O O O O O O cc O O C) O 0
O O O 0 C)
0
N N
CL `
O
r c LL
LU
w
W E E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Du') 0 0 0 L6 N
U') Q y O of o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC)
Q z ? o
= Q
CL
LL
cy Q
N D)
W L Ts ui N M M M N (D (,) O a0 c„)
r- rl- O O Co O O C) O c) 'i O O O O M Ch I? ?t I? ti ~
C
cu c) M M CD w a co N O N IT IT N
0 0
N
' M M N
O Q
W a
U cc
i
v
M N
N
H Q' O .- tD OR C) N r M O
P- r- M
, r- Lo ? O
r- Lo COO N O O O O (o C'i
M O O O O O O O O O 00
w z 3 r- N V ti
CL
z
U
03
CL
E
a
a)
w
m
CL
C
D
(p M
(1)
L N ?- c- C`') L0
N (O
a } v -i w LL LL
N
2 z a O O m Y a = ? ? z 00 wa.
-, z wa.
0 0 0
•
•
•
MARSOC - Start of headcut of natural stream
v ?

1? s
3.." " 4 ? ? sl -r
? ?..
• L( ? * ? A 1
• dA
-?
4
M ?'
-.,
"AIR
a
a,p? ,? t?

p
P
.
??C 144
s *
er
? .?, ? i
1 ,
S,
R
M
}
• .5
{
r `
?
V
?Cr
d .'? 4""-^f?. ~ 4, •. ?
( rAK

.11,41,14M
'11? 1
4'!R ik.
+s r
F
S }

x
(tr k?'>. a` i

?,
y`?

T

r

Vp? T r ? r ? A fi R ?r
` F
r z?
AN.
t

t --,OTT

y
`",?
..
i
.? ? ~?? a Q`s? ?1Fs A t F ?
Y
q o
? paR/ a
Y °.? k A ?, ?• '?` d ? y ? 4 i`.
.
Co.

. t. At
-41

Ile

MARSOC - Further downstream
•

•
MARSOC - Upstream view, note logs, roots, and natural sediments
MARSOC - Stream that headcut stream empties into
•
•
c:
MARSOC - Natural log barrier
MARSOC - Downstream of previous photo
•
•

MARSOC - Natural log barriers
c: