NC0001376_additional information requested_20000725

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 25, 2000
Mr. John Elmore
Riverplace Il, LLC
P.O. Box 10848
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
F?W'A
- A141,0
A00--ft-W..0 6,
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit modification request
Permit NC0001376
Wake County
Dear Mr. Elmore:
The Division received your request to modify the subject permit on November 19, 1999. In order
to transfer ownership of permit NC0001376, the Division needs information on the type and volume of
wastewater to be discharged at this facility.
The current permit is for a textile -manufacturing discharge and includes effluent limitations &
monitoring requirements appropriate for that type of discharge. In order to reissue the permit, the
Division must develop new permit conditions for Riverplace II, tailored to the new activities planned for
the facility. Many parameters in the current permit will not be required if you do not plan to manufacture
textiles. Please submit:
A complete description of the planned activities (manufacturing, warehousing, office leasing,
etc.) that you plan for this facility, including the amounts and characteristics of wastewater
each activity will produce.
A wastewater flow schematic. Describe the existing (installed) components and any planned
modifications to the treatment process.
If you have any questions about the NPDES permitting process, contact me at the telephone
number or address listed at the bottom of the previous page.
Sincerely,
David A. Goodrich
NPDES Unit Supervisor
cc: NPDES File
Raleigh Regional Office / Tim Baldwin
Point Source Compliance and Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone], ext. 517 FAX [phone]
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET@ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES [e-mail]

Re:, Burlington Industries/ Riverplace
Subject: Re: Burlington Industries/ Riverplace
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:33:39 -0500
From: Dave Goodrich <dave. goodrich@ncmail. net>
To: Mike Templeton <[e-mail]>, Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
CC: Bill Reid <[e-mail]>
Thanks, Mike. I'm still in a bit of a confused state about how we should
treat this load transfer as a "third party". I'll mention it to Jill when I
talk with her about the Neuse position paper.
Mike Templeton wrote:
> Steve Levitas called today with some questions about the Neuse rules
> While we were on the phone, I asked him about the allocation issue at
> Burlington Industries. He said that they looked at allocation options
> when they were negotiating the sale to Riverplace, so all parties are
> aware of the issue. (Craig Bromby represented the buyers.) There will be
> a discharge from the property, but it won't be much of one. Everyone
> figured that Riverplace would either purchase some allocation (maybe get
> some back from Raleigh) or would hook up to Raleigh; either way, the
> folks at Riverplace know they have no allocation and that they need to
> take action before Jan 03. They hope to be able to get a permit in the
> meantime, even if it says 'no discharge after 1213110.3 without an
> allocation, ' He will talk with Bromby about it.
> He said they would appreciate getting the name change processed, so they
> don't continue to get mail as owner of the property. I mentioned all
> this to Charles, so he may go ahead with the name change and re -draft
> the response to Riverplace s application.
> SL would also like to come in and share some of his ideas about the
> trading program. For instance, he mentioned that there needs to be a
> clear means of identifying each discharger's allocation, also, the rule
> needs to be more specific about how the process will work. He will call
> you or Coleen to arrange a meeting.
1 of 1 1/14/00 6:52 AM

Burlington Industries/ Riverplace
Subj$ct: Burlington Industries/ Riverplace
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:56:25 -0500
From: Mike Templeton <mike.templeton @ ncmail.net>
To: Dave Goodrich <Dave.Goodrich @ ncmail.net>, Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
BCC: Mike Templeton <[e-mail]>
Steve Levitas called today with some questions about the Neuse rules.
While we were on the phone, I asked him about the allocation issue at
Burlington Industries. He said that they looked at allocation options
when they were negotiating the sale to Riverplace, so all parties are
aware of the issue. (Craig Bromby represented the buyers.) There will be
a discharge from the property, but it won't be much of one. Everyone
figured that Riverplace would either purchase some allocation (maybe get
some back from Raleigh) or would hook up to Raleigh; either way, the
folks at Riverplace know they have no allocation and that they need to
take action before Jan 03. They hope to be able to get a permit in the
meantime, even if it says 'no discharge after 12/31/03 without an
allocation.' He will talk with Bromby about it.
He said they would appreciate getting the name change processed, so they
don't continue to get mail as owner of the property. I mentioned all
this to Charles, so he may go ahead with the name change and re -draft
the response to Riverplace's application.
SL would also like to come in and share some of his ideas about the
trading program. For instance, he mentioned that there needs to be a
clear means of identifying each discharger's allocation; also, the rule
needs to be more specific about how the process will work. He will call
you or Coleen to arrange a meeting.
1 of 1 12/7/00 2:38 PM

NCO001376 - Burlington Industries plant
Subject: NC0001376 - Burlington Industries plant '
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:21:07 -0500
From: Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
To: Tim Baldwin <[e-mail]>��✓
CC: Mike Templeton < Mike.Templeton@ncmail. net>
C�-�-�
Tim, we exchanged e-mail on this site long ago (3-30-99). At that time, �r1 �_ / A /
we agreed to revisit your inspection of the site if a new owner wasI"c
designated. Well, a new owner (Riverplace II, LLC) applied for an
ownership change last week.
There is one obstacle, and it's considerable. In August, Burlington
transferred all of the nitrogen allocation for the facility to the City �` I�A _ 1
of Raleigh. Thus, permit NC0001376 has NO nitrogen allocation and can't
discharge any nutrient -bearing wastewater until a new nitrogen
allocation has been acquired. ) tom'
In order to assign Riverplace a new nitrogen allocation, we need to know
what their plans for the site are. What type of wastewater do they plan
to discharge, and how much flow will they require? (� d Kill
�° � jib �vrl
The attached letter is a DRAFT of our (first) response to the ownership MAL
l'' f change request. I'm having Mike Templeton review it before I send it
out. I didn't address the Neuse/nitrogen issue in this letter. I `
don't want to hit these folks with too much at once. That issue will CkaASr
come up once we know how much nitrogen they need. We must first
determine what their plans and needs are.
We'll need two things from you:
The inspection report from your site visit earlier this year. We need
to know what the condition of the existing WWTP is, and what holding
capacity is available until this issue is resolved. (You can send me a
copy electronically and follow it with a hard copy later.)
Input on the options for wastewater disposal at the site. Once the
nitrogen allocation is determined, the new owners will likely need to do
an EAA. Please share any concerns the RRO has about this site, along
with any recommended changes to the permit.
Thanks for your help with this. These people will likely be very
unhappy with us for some time....
CHW
Name: 01376add.doc
01376add.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword,
:Encoding: base64
dell
''r� .Sl.!/V�C•-' G�J✓�GC� � ��� �i(f �7� .r���' /k J �er
r � � //CTL/
!.�/Hc r— G-'�lr � C�c- � / •--ate` �J i `� U rs ., �.r� c
�U Gt•G � r �' G1.1�"! � � �' !i►rl.S G` ram' `SV /. ��1[�/` �J�
1 of 1v��Y 11 30 99 8:01 AM

A/to fff9
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
CURRENT PERMIT INFORMATION:
Permit Number: NC00 0 / 1 / 3 / 7 / 6
1. Permit holder's name: BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
2. Permit's signing official's name and title: Ter L. Fripp
(Person legally responsible for permit)
Director of Corporate Engineering
(Title)
3. Mailing address: 3330 W. Friendly Avenue City: Greensboro
State: NC Zip Code: 27410 Phone: [phone]
E-mail address:. Fripp.Terry(5�Burlington.com
NEW OWNER/NAME INFORMATION:
1. This request for a name change is a result of:
x a. Change in ownership of property/company
b. Name change only
c. Other (please explain):
2. New owner's name (name to be put on permit):
RIVERPLACE II, L.L.C.
3. New owner's or signing official's name and title: JOHN ELMORE
(Person legally responsible for permit)
MANAGING MEMBER
(Title)
P. O. Box 49688 1084 c(
4. Mailing address: 301 N. Boylan Avenue
State: NC Zip Code: 27605
E-mail address:
City: Raleigh
Phone: ( 19) 438-84t84 755-9008
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276991617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

PERMIT NAME / OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
THIS APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY UNLESS
ALL OF THE APPLICABLE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL.
REQUIRED ITEMS:
1. This completed application form
2. Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as a contract, deed, articles of
incorporation)
For changes of ownership, this form must be completed and signed by both the current permit
holder and the new owner of the facility.
For name change only, the current permit holder must complete and sign the Applicant's
Certification.
Current Permittee's Certification:
I,� Terry L. Fripp , attest that this application for name/ownership
change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required
supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be
returned as incomplete.
Signature: l( Date: c!- 4' - S
Applicant's Certi ication:
I, John Elmore , attest that this application for a
name/ownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that
if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package vill) returned as incomplete._----,
Sign
E COMP
Date. - L-J,J1
ED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
& MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDDRESS:
NC DENR / DWQ
NPDES Unit
1617 11i'lail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Version 9-97

rtt()M bUhL1NG'CON INDUSTRIES _. ... L9Juu4
1- 7. 23' 99 A ; 25/3T• 5: 2�,c✓ 465`45 P 2
I�LiTP
PreDwed by Randall A. Mcnson
IPA �
CORPORATION GENERAL WARRANTY DEED - VPCI L )-T
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE I�
3rj
THIS DEED, made this the 2,Rd day of August, 1999 by BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES, INC. ( subsequent in interest to Burlington Mills Corporation ), a
Delaware corporation with corporate offices at 3330 West Friendly Avenue,
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina 27410 ("Grantor" ) to
RIVERPLACE, L. L. C. , a North Carolina limited liability company, c/o Bennett
Kesler, 7200 Stonehedge Drive, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 27613
("Grantee" ).
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by the
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does hereby grant,
bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, its successors and
assigns, three tracts of land with all improvements thereon appurtenant
( the " premises " ) in the Wake Forest Township, County of Wake , State of
North Carolina, situated and More particularly described as follows:
All recorded documents referenced in this Deed are found in the
office of the Register of Deeds for Wake County, North Carolina )
1

Ui,&:Ji.1a CAI iu.JJ rna 51414JV44J
rit�M KLINGTON IiVD'USTAIES
bxUU1SJ
r1hx(1r,
L9005
(FRI)
7. 23' 99
8:26/ST,
8;25/iNO. 4H62265145 P
3
First Tact (Plant Site, P/O Wake County TM 285- 00000- 003 ):
A certain tract being bound on the East by the westerly right-of-way line of U,S.
Highway 1 (having a variable right-of-way width); on the South by the lands of
the Grantor, Burlington Industries, Inc.; on the West by the centerline of the CSX
Railroad ( formally the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, having a right-cf-
way width of 80 feet); and on the North by the Byme property N/F, the Beltline
Associates property N/F and Lots 8 through 16 and south right of way line of
Circle Drive as shown on the Subdivision Map recorded in Book of 1965, page 6;
and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an old corner being the point of intersection of the
southerly right -of --way line of Circle Drive and the westerly right-of-way
line of U.S. Highway 1, also being a comer of Lot 17, Book of Maps 1965,
page 6, in the westerly right-of-way line of US Highway 1( also know as
Capital Blvd. ); thence South 33 degrees 25' 24" West along said
westerly right-of-way line as established 1874.40 feet to a new comer in
said westerly right-of-way line of US Highway 1, said new comer being
located South 33 degrees 25' 24" West along said right-of-way line
550.0 feet from the centerline of the main plant facility drive at its
intersection with the right -of way line; thence North 56 degrees 34' 36"
West, along a new division line, 238.90 feet to a new corner being the
point of intersection with a line always parallel to and 240.0 feet south of
the south face of the main plant building: thence South 74 degrees 25'
22" West, along said parallel line and a new division line, 304.46 feet to
a new corner being the point of intersection with a line being the
centerline projection of that facility maintenance road west of the most
westerly aeration basin of the Waste Treatment Facility; thence South 42
degrees 56' 49' West, along said centerline projection and a new division
line, 622.26leet to a new corner, thence North 74 degrees 25' 54"
West, along a new division line passing no closer than 10 feet from the
most northerly comer of the waste treatment facility Sludge Drying Beds,
506.66 feet to a new corner in the westerly right-of-way for CSX Railroad
( formerly Seaboard Airline Railroad, having e claimed right- of- way width
of 80 feet ), thence South 15 degrees 34' 06' West along said right- of -
way line 920.66 feet to an iron pin on the Northam bank of the Neuse
River, said iron pin being in a southern line of Grantor; thence North 64
degrees 08' 32" West, along said southern line, 40.65 feet to a point in
the centerline of CSX Railroad, the southwest comer of Grantor, thence
along the centerline of the CSX Railroad and the westerly line of Grantor
the following seven ( 7 ) courses; (1) North 15 degrees 34' 06" East
1901.77 feet, (2) North 15 degrees 35' 44" East 882.44 feet, (3)
North 15 degrees 44' 46" East 199.47 feet, (4) a curve to the right
having a Radius of 5009,71 feet, A Length of 186.97 feet, and a Chord
of North 16 degrees 41' 07" East 186.88 feet, (5) a curve to the right
having a Radius of 1950.79 feet, A Length OF 317.05 feet, and a chord
of North 22 degrees 16' 53" East 316.70 feet, (6) a curve to the right
having a Radius 1907.09 feet, A Length OF 839.77 feet, and a Chord of
2

u I i f:J/ 14 rnl 10. 00 rAA 414140VLLJ bxuuhb rihxcE L& 006
FROM BURLINGTON 1NDUSTgiES (FRI) 7, 28' 99 8;26/ST, 8;25/N0. 4862265145 P 4
North 39 degrees 41' 00" East 833.01 feet, and (7) a curve to the right
having a Radius of 1879.71 feet, A Length OF 518.34 feet, and a chord
of North 60 degrees 11' 39" East 516.70 feet to a point on the
centerline of the CSX Railroad, an old corner being the most northern
comer of Lot No, 1 as shown on a map dated September 8, 1913, entitled
" Map of Mantle A. Dunn Land a, and recorded in Book of Maps 1811,
_ . page 96, the northwestern corner of Grantor, Thence South 29 degrees
03' East along a northerly line of Grantor and the line of the Byrne
property N/F, passing through existing iron pipes on line at 40.32 feet
and 99.34 feet for a total distance of 456.25 feet to an old comer being
the most northern comer of a parcel conveyed to Beltline Associates by
Deed dated May 13, 1888, and recorded in Deed Book 4261, page 903;
thence South 16 degrees 19' 29" west along the westerly line of Beltline
Associates N!F 522.81 feet to an old corner being the most northern
comer of Lot 8 as shown on a map dated Jan. 1995, entitled "Property of
Burlington Industries, Inc_ @ Wake Finishing Co. Plant", and recorded in
Book of Maps 1966, page 6; thence along the westerly and southerly lines
of Lots 8 thru 16, all inclusive and the additional small parcels conveyed
with Lots 9 and 12, the following thirteen (13) courses: (1) South 54
degrees 14' 43' West 224.49 feet to an old corner, (2) South 12
degrees 40' 43" west 123.91 feet to an old comer, (3) North 77
degrees 25' 46" West 30.0 feet to an old corner, (4) South 12
degrees 34' 14" best 111.42 feet to an old comer, (5) South 29
degrees 05' 46" East 21.42 feet to an old comer, (6) North 60 degrees
S4' 14' East 30.0 feet to an old comer, (7) South 29 degrees 05' 43"
East 214.07 feet to an old corner, (8) South 70 degrees 32' East
149.25 feet to an old corner, (9) forth 83 degrees 37' 22" East crossing
Neuse Avenue 55.33 feet to an old corner, (10) South 19 degrees 24'
14" West 82.45 feet to an old corner, (11) South 56 degrees 35' 46"
East 93.71 feet to an old corner, (12) North 33 degrees 24' 14" East
130.0 feet to an old comer, and (13) South 56 degrees 35' 46" East
400.0 feet to an old corner being the most southern comer of Lot 16;
thence along the southeasterly line of Lot 16 North 33 degrees 26' 41"
East 209.96 feet to an old corner in the southerly right-of-way line of
Circle Drive (having a right-of-way width of 60 feet); thence southeasterly
along said right-of-way line South 56 degrees 33' 26" East along said
right- of- way line 77.62 feet to an old corner marking the "sight distance
set -back" for the Intersection of Circle Drive with U. S. Highway 1; thence
South 06 degrees 24' 05" East along said "sight distance set -back"
65.44 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 1 and the
point of BEGINNING, containing 99.498 acres +.
Also being shown as Lot 1 on a map entitled " final plat Subdivision
property of Burlington Industries, Inc. " dated 7- 25- 97, revised 5- 13- 99
by S. D. Puckett Assoc, Inc. of Durham, NC; recorded in Book of Maps
page
3

U,/-./0o 47,0i iV-UU ylylfJULLJ DKUUA3 rltAuh 9007
FROM BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES (FRI) 7. 23' 99 8:27/ST, 8:25/N0, 4862265145 P 5
The Fib Tract being a portion of the lands acquired by Burlington Mills
Corporation (name changed to Burlington Industries, Inca by Deed dated April
30, 1945 and recorded in Deed Book 921, page 213.
THERE is Reserved and g cepted from the First Tract a parcel containing
1.231 Acres, being more particularly described as follows;
Commencing on the sixth ( 6 ) comer as described in the First Tract
above; thence North 15 degrees 34' 06' East along the eastern right- of -
way line of the CSX Railroad, 988.37 feet to a corner in said right- of -
way; thence North 15 degrees 35' 44" East continuing along said right-
of- way line 285.79 feet to the point of BEGINNING being the southwest
corner of the parcel to be retained; thence North 15 degrees 39' 44"
East along said right- of- way line 314L67 feet to the northwest corner of
the parcel; thence South 67 degrees 14' 37" East along a new division
line 213.39 feet to the northeast comer of the parcel; thence South 07
degrees 48' 03" West along a new division line 181.64 feet to the
southeast comer of the parcel; thence along the southern line of the
parcel the following three ( 3 ) courses: ( 1 ) North 89 degrees 43' 29"
West 162.43 feet, ( 2 ) South 48 degrees 05' 16" West 72.55 feet,
and ( 3 ) North 74 degrees 24' 15" West 40 72 feet to the point of
BEGINNING.
Also being shown as Lot 3 on a map entitled " final plat Subdivision
property of Burlington Industries, Inc. ' dated 7- 25- 97, revised 5- 13- 99
by S. D_ Puckett Assoc. Inc. of Durham, NC; recorded in Book of Maps
page
There is also reserved a 20 feet wide access easement for ingress and
egress from US Highway 1 to said parcel along a route location
acceptable to both Grantor and Grantee.
For the mutual benefit of both parties in their operation of the Raw Water
Treatment Facility ( "RW'TF", conveyed as a part of the First Tract) and the
Waste Water Treatment Facility ( "WWTF", to be retained by 9urfington
Industries, Inc_ ), the parties agree for themselves, their successors or
assigns to the following easements, access rights -of -way and obligations:
1. An easement 25 feet in width, being 12.5 feet on either side of the
existing centerline of the electrical utility line crossing the WVV TF as it
runs from the main plant building to the Raw Water Pump Station located
on the south bank of the Neuse River, for the purpose of access for
maintenance or replacement.
2. An easement 40 feet in width, being 20 feet on either side of the
existing centerline of the existing 160 raw water line as it crosses the
V4WTF from the Raw Water Pump Station on the south bank of the Neuse
4

v 1 / -Ji i'J0 1 1. 1 l . . UU 1'A 0101 -1JU4 4
DAUUAO
rizAi.i.
41008
FROM BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES
(FRI)
7.23'44
8;27/S7. 8:25/NO.4862265145 P 6
River to the Raw Water Treatment Facility , for the purpose of access for
maintenance or replacement.
3. An easement 20 feet in with, being 10 feet on either side of the
centerline of the Maintenance Drives crossing the WVVTF, for the purpose
of access to the three Alum Sludge Ponds which are a part of the Raw
Water Treatment Facility.
4. An easement 20 feet in width, being 10 feet on either slde of all
Sanitary Waste pipelines, all Stormwater Sewer pipelines, all Alum
Backwash Basins discharge pipelines and all electrical utility lines
running from the Fi s� t Trait and crossing the WVV7F, for the purpose of
maintenance or replacement.
5. The right given to the owner of the First Tract to continue to deposit
sanitary waste water, storm water and alum backwash basins discharge
Into the WVVTF until such time as said water can be diverted into a
municipal system.
6. An access easement along the existing paved travelways or drives
leading from US Highway 1 to the RWTF or, WWTF and the agreement to
share on a 50/50 basis all costs related to the maintenance of all shared
paved travelways or drives.
7. All other easements, access rights -of -ways and agreements necessary
to the operation of the RVVTF and WVV7F.
Second Tract ( Water intake station site, lying south of the Neuse River;
PIO Wake County TM 285- 00000- 003 )
A certain tract being bound on the North by the Neuse River, on the East and
South by the lands of E. T. Yost N/F, and on the West by the westerly right-of-
way line of the CSX Rail Road ( formally the Seaboard Airline Railroad
Company, having a claimed right-ef-way width of 80 feet ); and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an old comer being in the easterly right-af-way line and
75 feet from the centerline of the Seaboard Airline Railroad Company and
being the northwesterly corner of a tract conveyed by Burlington Mills
Corporation to E. T. Yost by Deed dated December 29, 1947 and
recorded in Deed Book 984, page 106; thence North 17 degrees 45'
East along the easterly right-of-way of the Railroad 401.25 feet to an old
comer on the bank of. the Neuse River; thence South 62 degrees 43'
East along the Bank of the River 109.59 feet to an old corner of E. T.
Yost Property N/F; thence along the line of E. T. Yost Property NIF the
following three (3) courses: (1) South 38 degrees 22' West 104.4 feet
to an old comer, (2) South 09 degrees 30' West 287.50 -feet to an old
comer, and (3) North 72 degrees 15' West 112.6 feet to the point of
Beginning.

U, i l..J/ 04 rl%l lU . J / rAA d1d / 4JULLJ
r�nUM bUh11jAQT'1'0 INDT)STkIES
bKUUAS
V!hRCE
1J 009
(kI)
7. 23' 99
8:27/ST.
8:25/NO, 4862265145 P
7
1. A portion of the tract conveyed to Burlington Mills Corporation (name changed
to Burlington industries, Inc.) by Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company by Deed
dated August 18. 1947 and recorded in Deed Book 981, page 90,
2. A triangular strip of land conveyed to Burlington Mills Corporation (name
changed to Burlington Industries, Inc.) by E. T. Yost by Deed dated August 5,
1947 and recorded in Deed Book 977, page 171,
The Second Tract is also shown as that certain tract labeled as I-B-F-G-H-1 on a
map darted August 11, 1947, entitled "Map Showing Property of Burlington Mills
Corporation - Neuse, North Carolina", and recorded in Book of Maps 1947, page
65.
Third Tract ( Surplus Tract, lying East of U_ S_ Highway 1; P/0-Wake County
P/O Wake County TM 285- 00000- 003 ):
A certain tract being bound on the East by the Flowers property N/F, on the
South by the Neuse River, on the West by the easterly right-of-way of U_ S.
Highway 1 (having a variable right-of-way width), and on the forth by Index
Associates N/F and Carolina Capital Ventures N/F; and being more particularly
described as follows:
BEING all of Lot 3 as shown on a map dated November 17, 1992, entitled
"Survey for Burlington Industries, Inc. & Index Associates', as recorded in
Book of Maps 1993, page 478 containing 46.076 Acres, more or less.
Grantor also conveys all of its right, title, interest and responsibility to that
certain Road Maintenance Agreement recorded in Deed Book 5585, page
32.
THERE is Reserved and Excepted from The Third Tract a parcel containing
4.641 Acres + being a northern portion of the aforementioned Lot 3 and
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most eastern corner of Lot 3 as shown in Book of
Maps 1993, page 478; thence South 08' 38' 14" West along the easterly
line of Lot 3, 452.10 feet to a new corner, thence North 81" 22' 42"
West along a new Division line of Lot 3, 608.70 feet to a new comer in
the easterly line of Lot 2 as shown in aforesaid Book of Maps 1993, page
478; thence North 33' 23' 40" East along the easterly line of Lot 2 and
Lot 1, 335.88 feet to an old corner being the most northern corner of Lot
3; thence South 81' 21' 46" East along the northerly line of Lot 3,
450.00 feet to the point of Beginning.
Also being shown as Lot 4 on a map entitled " Final Plat Subdivision for
Property of Burlington Industries, Inc." dated 5- 10- 99 by S. D_ Puckett &
Assoc. Inc. of Durham, NC; recorded in Book of Maps , page
6

u i , ,:J/ 0,1 rnl 10: 0 J rA.& Jilt r 4JuCGs BROOKS PIERCE Z 010
,,RGIt BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES (FRI) 7. 23' 99 8;28/ST. 8;25A0, 4862265145 F 8
There is also reserved an access right of way, 30 feat wide along Index
Drive ( a private road ) as shown on the beforementioned Book of Maps
1993, page 478.
The Third Tract being a portion of the lands acquired by Burlington Mills
Corporation (name changed to Burlington Industries, inc.)' by Deed dated April
30. 1945 and recorded in Deed Book 921, page 213.
The three tracts of land and all improvements thereon appurtenant
described above are conveyed subject to all covenants, restrictions, and
easements of record: rights -of -way and easements for streets and utilities, and
railroads, if any applicable to said property; all easements, restrictions and
rights -of -way as may be apparent from a visual inspection of the property; and
zoning ordinances and building restrictions of the Town of Wake Forest, County
of Wake and cad valorem taxes not due and payable as of the date of closing
or for the year 1999_
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tract of land, together with all
privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging or In any wise appertaining
unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever.
AND the said Grantor for itself, Its Successors and Assigns does by these
presents, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and Assigns. that the
said Grantor is seized of said premises in fee simple and has the right to convey
the same In fee simple; that said premises are free and clear from all
encumbrances ( with the exceptions above stated ); and that, subject to such
exceptions, if any, it will warrant and defend the said title to the premises
against the lawful claims of all persons or entities whomsoever.

UI, AJi 44 rr.1 lU.J/ C11A 41414ouzzO
rnu�yt I3u:S:,11V1r1UP{ 1,vUu�tttI�s
bhUWhJ
(FRI)
r'lhxf( h
7. 23' 99
iAIa�l
8;28/ST,
8:25A0. 4862265145 P 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
by authority
duly given and
as the act of the
Corporation, the undersigned officers have executed this Instrument on behalf
of the Corporation, as authorized by its Board of Directors, the date and year first
above written.
( Corporate Seal)
ATTEST:
By:
Assistant Secretary
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
By:
Senior Vice President
********
*******w
s

U i i :;Ji :)t9 rnl lU . J ! rAA bib / 4JULLJ
rnuyn D�I�LiaYlrlV1V uyllu�t:t1�5
}}j{1Juhi )
PIERCE
fig 012
(FRI)
7. 23' 99
8:28/ST.
8:25/N0, 4862265145
P ja
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
1' , a Notary Public, do hereby
certify that personally came
before me this day and acknowledged that he is Assistant Secretary of
Burlington Industries, Inc., and that by authority duly given and as the act of
the Corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Senior
Vice President, sealed with Its corporate seal, and attested by himself as its
Assistant Secretary. Witness my hand and official seal, this 2nd day of
August, 1999.
( NOTARY SEAL)
Notary Public
My commission expires
The foregoing certificate of is certified to be
correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered this day of
Page 1999 at AM/PM, Book
Register of Deeds
Wake County
By:
Deputy/Assistant
Register of Deeds
9

:Vnvre�DUliL1J1GCuJvv1NUU6Th1E6 I, 3VViiN
DAUUAJ r1Gnua L6013
(FRI) 7. 23' 99 8: 28/STT, 8 ; 25AC, 4862255i 45 F I I
YrepWod Dy Randag A. Hamon
CORPORATION GENERAL WARRANTY DEED wwrP
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
THIS DEED, made this the 2nd day of August, 1999 by BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES, INC. ( subsequent in interest to Burlington Mulls Corporation ), Q
Delaware corporation with corporate offices at 3330 West Friendly avenue,
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina 27410 ("Grantor" ) to
RIVERPLACE, L. L. C. , a North Carolina limited liability company, c/o Bennett
Kesler, 7200 Stonehedge Drive, Raleigh, Wake County. North Carolina 27613
("Grantee" J.
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by the
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does hereby grant,
bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, its successors and
assigns, three tracts of land with all improvements thereon appurtenant
( the " premises " ) In the Wake Forest Township, County of Wake , State of
North Carolina, situated and more particularly described as follows:
( All recorded documents referenced in this Deed are found in the
office of the Register of Deeds for Wake County, North Carolina )
1

u r i GJi 40 rAl 10: J6 rAA ylb! 4JULLJ bhUUAS rihX(:h 4014
FROM BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES (FRI) 7.23'99 8:28/ST. 8.25/N0,4862265145 P 12
Being a Tract of land with all improvements thereon appurtenant to the Waste
Water Treatment Facility, bound on the East by US Highway 1, on the South by
the Meuse River, on the West by the CSX Railroad and on the North by the
lands of the Grantee, situated and more particularly described as follows
Beginning at Point, being a new comer in the westerly right-of-way line of
US Highway 1( also known as Captial Blvd, ), said corner being South 33
degrees 25' 24" West along said right-of-way line 550.0 feet from the
centerline of the maim plant facility drive at its intersection with the right-
of-way line; thence North 56 degrees 34' 36" West, along a new division
line, 238.90 feet to a new comer, thence North 74 degrees 25' 22"
West, along a new division line, 304.46 feet to a new comer, thence
South 42 degrees 56' 49" West, along a new division line., 622.28 feet to
a new comer; thence North 74 degrees 25' 54" West, along a new
division line, - 506.66 feet to a new corner in the easterly right - of - way
line of CSX Railroad ( formerly Seaboard Airline Railroad); thence South
15 degrees 34' 06' West, along said right - of - way line, 920.00 feet to a
new comer on the northerly bank of the Neuse River; thence South 64
degrees 08' 32` East, along the northerly bank of the river, 320.49 feet to
anew comer; thence South 71 degrees 03' 35" East, continuing along
the northerly bank of the river, 513.26 feet to a new comer in the westerly
right - of - way line of US Highway 1; thence North 33 degrees 25' 24"
East, along said right-of-way line 693.31 feet to an old corner, thence
North 39 degrees 54' 15" East, along said right-of-way line, 150.52 feet
to an old comer; thence North 33 degrees 25' 24" East, along said right-
of-way line, 726.24 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Also being shown as Lot 2 an a map entitled " final plat Subdivision
property of Burlington Industries, Inc. " dated 7- 25- 97, revised 5- 13- 99
by S. D. Puckett Assoc. Inc. of Durham, NC; recorded in Book of Maps
Page
Said Waste Treatment Facility Tract being a portion of the lands acquired
by Burlington Mills Corporation ( named changed to Burlington Industries,
Inc. ) by Deed dated April 30, 1945 and recorded in Deed Book 921, page
213 of the Wake County Registry.

.,, ., _ -X O.La l DAUUAa ric.n�lG l6 015
MM �UHL1NGTON ENDUSTRIES (FRI) 7. 23' 99 6:29/ST. 8:25/12. 4H2265145 P 13
The Tract of land and all improvements thereon described above are
conveyed subject to all covenants, restrictions, and easements of record; and
rights -of -way and easements for streets and utilities, and railroads, if any
applicable to said property; all easements, restrictions and rights -of -way as may
be apparent from a visual inspection of the property; and zoning ordinances
and building restrictions of the City of Raleigh or Town of Wake Forest and
County of Wake and ad vo gTpM taxes not due and payable as of the date of
conveyance or for the year 1999.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tract of land, together with all
privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging or In any wise appertaining
unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever.
AND the said Grantor for its Successors and Assigns does by these
presents, covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and Assigns, that the
said Grantor is seized of said premises in fee simple and has the right to convey
the some in fee simple; that said premises are free and clear from all
encumbrances ( with the exceptions above stated ); and that, subject to such
exceptions, if any, it will warrant and defend the said title to the premises
against the lawful claims of all persons or entities whomsoever.
3

V,. ". / as rni LU-00 rAA bAUUKS PIERCE Z016
FROM BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES (FAI) 7.23'99 8;29/ST, 8:25/ND.4862265I45 P 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by authority duly given and as the act of the
Corporation, the undersigned officers have executed this instrument on behalf
of the Corporation, as authorized by its Board of Directors, the date and year first
above written.
( Corporate Seal )
ATTEST:
BY=
Assistant Secretary
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
By:
Senior Vice President
4

u I i cil as rAl 10: J2f rAA blb r 4ju;LZO
MOM 512LINGTON INDUSTRIES
BROUAS PIERCE 16017
(FRI) 7,25'99 8:29/ST, 8:25/1K 4862265145 P 15
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
I' a Natary Public, do hereby
certify that personally came
before me this day and acknowledged that he is Assistant Secretary of
Burlington Industries, inc., and that by authority duly given and as the act of
the Corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Senior
Vice President, sealed with its corporate seal, and attested by himself as its
Assistant Secretary. Witness my hand and official seal, this 2nd day of
August, 1999.
( NOTARY SEAL)
Notary Public
My commission expires
The foregoing certificate of is certified to be
correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered this day of
Page 1999 at AM/PM, Book
Register of Deeds
Wake County
1.0
Deputy/Assistant
Register of Deeds
5

08&20/99 FRI 09:40 FAUK 9197430225 BROOIiS PIERCE
2001
FAX ANSI SSION CO Brooks, Pierce cLendon,
,'um hrey & Leonard, L.L. P-
Street Address; First Unljon Capitol Center
Mailing Address: Post Office $ox 1300 Suit* 1600
P41olgh, North Carolina 27602 iso Fayett*villc Street Mall
Phone' [phone] Meigh, North Carolina 27601
Fax. [phone]
Date:
To: 5 m LG� If
From.
Fax N0.
FaxNo.
Fxx NO -
i✓axNo.
YaU SHOULD RECEIVE �` PAGEM, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU
DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL K
AT [phone].
hffSSAG£:
'Iho infot:aation coataitYed in this fax transmittal is privileged and confidential istteaded far G a ssa
aaly. 1f yot. are steiu� u the intended rCo3pieat nor the cmp10yee ar agent nspotujble for delivering this message to
the intetldcd recipient, any
d3sclos= of this Snfam.Won b nay w! or miring of say adios in reliance on this
rolmbited. If You have re= vad this fax in crror,'glease notify the person tra�nsstYitiLag e
istfarmatioa is strictly p Y
inform It%0a ira-aediately.

08/.20/99 FRI 09:40 FAX [phone] BROOHS PIERCE 0 002
DEED OF GIFT
THIS DEED OF GIFT (the "Deed") is made and given this the day of August,
1999, by BURLINGTON INDLTSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Burlington"), to THE
CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, a North Carolina municipality (the "City").
WHEREAS, Burlington is the holder of a nitrogen discharge allocation pursuant to the
Neese River Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy, 15A NCAC 2B .0234, in
the amount of Fifty Six Thousar d Three Hundred Sixty Eight (56,368) pounds per year (the
"Allocation"); and
WFI,REAS, Burlingtori wishes to donate the Allocation to the City and the City wishes
to receive the Allocation; and
WHEREAS, it is the parties' intent that Burlington's donation of the Allocation to the
City pursuant to this Deed shall qualify as a charitable contribution by Burlington pursuant to
Section 174(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and pursuant to applicable provisions of
the North Carolina General Statutes;
NOW, THEREFORE,
1. Burlington hereby gifts, contributes, transfers, and conveys to the City, and the
City hereby accepts and assumes from Burlington, the Allocation.
2. The City hereby represents to Burlington that the City has been duly authorized to
accept the Allocation and to execute and receive this Deed of Gift pursuant to a
resolution of the City Council dated August 3, 1999.
3. In consideration for the donation of the Allocation, the City hereby agrees that it
will use or reconvey the Allocation exclusively for public purposes within the
meaning of Section 170(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
4.. The City hereby agrees to provide Burlington, contemporaneously with the
execution of this Deed, with an acknowledgment of receipt in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
Signatures appear on following page.

0$%20/99 FRI 09:41 FAX [phone] BROOKS FIERCE
2003
ZN WITNESS WI-I£RRCF, the parties have caused this Deed of Gift to be executed by
their duly authorized representatives as of the date first above -written.
Thomas A. McCormick
City Attorney
gifdeed.2
Burlington Industries, Inc.
By:
Title:
The City of Raleigh, North arolina
By.,
Title: fA.w
3

s
08/20/99 FRI 09:41 FAX [phone] BROOKS PIERCE
2004
"ity. Of alei�li
,North Carolina
EXHIBIT .A.
August 4, 1999
Burlington Industries, Inc.
3330 West Friendly Avenue
Greensboro, Forth Carolina. 27410
ATTN: Robert A. Wicker, Esq.
vice President and General Counsel
The City of Raleigh hezeby acknowledges receipt from
Burlington zx�dustries, Inc., on August 4, 1999, of an annual
i nitrogen discharge allocation, created pursuant to the Neuse
River Nutrient Sensitive Watexs Management Strategy,
15A NCAC 2B .0234, in the amount of 56,358 pounds.
No benefits having a market value were provided to
Burlington industries, Inc., by the City of Raleigh in return
for its contribution.
Sincere-
D.E. Benton, Jr,
City Manager
DEB:vt/9441
OFFICES • 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX s90 • RALEICH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
Recycled Paper

Burlington Industries: 24-Hour Staffing Req'ment • C 0 00 I � I
Subject: Burlington Industries: 24-Hour Staffing Req'ment
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 14:24:01 -0400
From: "Dave Goodrich"<[e-mail]. nc.us> Internal
To: Bob Sledge < bob_sledge@h2 o. enr. state. nc.us >
CC: Mark McIntire <mark [e-mail]>
Thanks, Bob. I think we can handle the variance in the permit renewal cover
letter. Only potential concern that I didn't think of when we discussed
this the other day is that of time. I'm not sure that we're going to issue
the permit anytime soon (I would estimate around August or September). If
they can wait that long, no problem. Otherwise, we may have to handle it
through an approval letter. (I'd prefer that come from your shop.) If they
can wait, would you please forward a copy of the request to Mark so that he
remembers to include the language in the renewal letter?
- Dave
Bob Sledge wrote:
> I spoke with Ted Cashion about the status of this facility. He says the
> plant is still shut down, with only a skeletal staff on site performing
> operations and maintenance activities. They only discharge once a month
> and that flow is entirely regulated by the staff.
> RRO recommends continuing the variance to 24 hour staffing as long as
> they are in their current mode of operation (i.e. plant not in
> production). If you can and are willing to do this in the framework of
> the permit reissuance, I think that would be a clean way of doing it.
> We could include some standard language noting the director reserves the
> right to withdraw the variance if he becomes aware of conditions that
> would warrant around the clock staffing. They are trying to sell the
> plant; I'd assume in the event of a sale, a new determination would have
> to be made depending on the plans for the facility of a new owner.
> Thank you for your help. If you want me to go ahead and draft a letter
> on the subject, it shouldn't be difficult to get that done. Let me know
> how you'd like to proceed and if you would like the letter back for your
> file.
> Thank you.
> Bob
1 of 1 4/19/99 1:58 PM

Re: Burlington Industries Wake Finishing Plant
Subject: Re: Burlington Industries Wake Finishing Plant
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:31:54 EST
From: `Tim Baldwin" <[e-mail]>
Organization: DENR - Raleigh Regional Office
To: "Charles Weaver" <[e-mail]. nc.us>
CC: [e-mail]
Charles,
Sounds good. I did an inspection just a month or two ago, and
depending on when the Neuse permits are ready to go, I will either
use that inspection, or I will do a new one. Thanks.
-Tim Baldwin
-RRO WQS
-[phone] x251
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 199911,22.36 -0500
> From: "Charles Weaver" <char/es weavernah2o.enrstate.nc.us>
> To: Tim Baldwin <Tim 3aldwin0)rro. enr state.nc. us>
> Subject; Re: Burlington Industries Wake Finishing Plant
> This plant is supposedly shut down - only the domestic discharge
> remains The current owner is searching for someone to whom they can
> sell the plant, expecting the buyer will resume production.
> Hold off on doing the Staff Report now - until we know when the Neuse
> permits will be issued there's no need to waste effort on it• However,
> the site should be inspected prior to renewal of the permit. We need to
> know which ouffalls are still in use and which have been shut down.
> Contact Steve Levitas (839-0300) - he is the attorney for Burlington and
> is handling the permitting issues (his e-mail address is:
> [e-mail]). He can apprise you ofany developments
> regarding the sale of the plant.
> If a new owner takes possession before the permit is renewed, the place
> should be inspected then. We need to know who the new owners are and
> what they plan to do with the place. If no sale takes place before
> renewal, wait until you hear that the Neuse permits are ready to go,
> then do the staff report.
1 of 1 3/30/99 12:55 PM

BE00$s, PiEBCE, MCLENDo-w, HUMPHEEY & LEONAAD, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
L.P. McLENDON, JR.
STEVEN J. LEVITAS
HUBERT HUMPHREY
V. RANDALL TINSLEY
EDGAR S. FISHER, JR.
JOHN R. ARCHAMBAULT
W. ERWIN FULLER, JR.
S. KYLE WOOSLEY
JAMES T. WILLIAMS, JR.
DANIEL M. SROKA
WADE H. HARGROVE
FORREST W. CAMPBELL, JR.
M. DANIEL McGINN
MARCUS W. TRATHEN
MICHAEL D. MEEKER
JEAN C. BROOKS
WILLIAM G. McNAIRY
ANNE C. BRENNAN
EDWARD C. WINSLOW III
ELLEN P. HAMRICK
HOWARD L. WILLIAMS
ALLISON M. GRIMM
GEORGE W. HOUSE
JAMES C. ADAMS, II
WILLIAM P.H. CARY
ELIZABETH S. BREWINGTON
REID L. PHILLIPS
JOHN K. EASON
ROBERT A. SINGER
H. ARTHUR BOLICK II
JOHN H. SMALL
NATASHA RATH MARCUS
RANDALL A. UNDERWOOD
JOHN M. CROSS, JR.
S. LEIGH RODENBOUGH IV
JENNIFER K. VAN ZANT
WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR.
KEARNS DAVIS
MARKJ.PRAK
JILL R. WILSON
TRACEY BANKS COAN
MARC D. BISHOP
DAVID W. SAR
JIM W. PHILLIPS, JR.
KATHLEEN M. THORNTON
MACKSPERLING
BRIAN J. MOMILLAN
JEFFREY E. OLEYNIK
JENNIFER L. BOLICK
MARK DAVIDSON
DAVID KUSHNER
MELISSA H. WEAVER
DEREK J. ALLEN
JAMES R. SAINTSING
ELIZABETH V. LAFOLLETTE
JOHN W. ORMAND III
ERIN L. ROBERTS
ROBERT J. KING III
GINGER S. SHIELDS
Mr. Charles Weaver
NC DENR DWQ - NPDES
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North
Carolina 27626
MAILING ADDRESS OFFICE ADDRESS
POST OFFICE BOX IBOO SUITE 1600
RALEIGH, N.C. 27602 FIRST UNION CAPITOL CENTER
ISO FAYETTEVILLE STREET MALL
RALEIGH, N.C. 27601
FOUNDED1897
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE 919-839-0304 AUBREY L. BROOKS (1872-1958)
W.H. HOLDERNESS (1904-1965)
L.P. McLENDON (1890-1968)
KENNETH M. BRIM (1898-1974)
C.T. LEONARD, JR. (1929-1983)
CLAUDE C. PIERCE (1913-198B)
THORNTON H. BROOKS (1912-1988)
G. NEILDANIELS (1911-1997)
GREENSBORO OFFICE
2000 RENAISSANCE PLAZA
230 NORTH ELM STREET
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401
Jul 16 1998 WASHINGTON OFFICE
Y 7 2000 L STREET N.W., SUITE 200
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036
Re: Burlington Industries, Inc.
Wake Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0001376
Dear Charles:
Please find enclosed three copies of the NPDES permit renewal application for the above -
referenced facility, which includes the required residuals management plan. Since manufacturing
operations at the facility have been suspended since November 1996, it was not possible to conduct a
new priority pollutant analysis, but the most recent analysis is included with the application. A check
in the amount of $300.00 for the renewal application fee is enclosed. Please let me know if you require
anything further in order for this application to be considered complete.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
With best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON,
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Steven J. Levitas
SJL/ksm
Enclosures
cc: Robert A. Wicker, Esquire

im
Burlington Industries, Inc.
July 13, 1998
Mr. Charles Weaver
NCDENR - DWQ - MPBES
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626
Re: Permit Renewal Application
Dear Mr. Weaver:
Legal Department
P.O. Box 21207
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420
336-379-2435 (direct)
336-379-4504 (fax)
This letter will serve to confirm to your office that Mr. Steve Levitas, Brooks, Pierce,
McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, is authorized to act on behalf of Burlington Industries, Inc. in
submitting and obtaining approval for the permit application to be submitted on behalf of the
Company.
Thank you for your assistance in this regard.
Very trnuly yours,
4 �
Robert A. Wicker
Vice President and General Counsel
:ahh
cc: Steve Levitas, Esq.

,.tmZ 570
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
STANDARD FORM C - MANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIAL
SECTION I. APPLICATION AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION
Unless otherwise specified on this form all items are to be completed. If an Rem is not applicable indicate'NA'.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SELECTED ITEMS APPEAR IN SEPARATE INSTRUCTION BOOKLET AS INDICATED. REFER TO BOOKLET
BEFORE FILLING OUT THESE ITEMS.
Please Print or Type
1. Legal Name of Applicant
(see instructions)
2. Mailing Address of Applicant
(see Instructions)
Number & Street
City
State
Zip Code
3. Applicant's Authorized Agent
(see Instructions)
Name and Title
Number & Street
City
State
Zip Code
Telephone
4. Previous Application
If a previous application for a
permit under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System has been made, give
the date of application.
101
102a
102b
102c
102d
103a
103b
103c
103d
103e
103f
104
Burlin on Industries Inc.
P.O. Box 21207
Greensboro
27420
Robert A. Wicker
Vice -President and General Counsel
P.O. Box 21207
Greensboro
27420
336 379-2435
Area Number
Code
1993 Feb. 24
YR MO DAY
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete,
and accurate.
Tern L. Fripp 102e Director of Cor rate Engineering
Printed Name of Person Signip Title
102f �_ 6 TS
Signatu pl' r Autho ' ge YR MO DAY
Date Application Signed
North Carolina General Statue 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any
application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required
to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a
punishment by a fine or not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
WakeAppl.doc

5. Facility (see instructions)
Give the name, ownership, and
physical location of the plant or
other operating facility where
discharge(s) presently occur(s)
or will occur.
Name 105a
Ownership (Public, Private
or both Public and Private) 105b
Check block if a Federal
facility 105c
and give GSA Inventory
Control Number 105d
Location:
Number & Street
105e
City
105f
County
105g
State
105h
6. Nature of Business State the nature
106a
of the business conducted at the
plant or operating facility.
106b
7, Facility Intake Water (see
instructions) Indicate water intake
volume per day by sources.
Estimate average volume per day
in thousand gallons per day.
Municipal or private water system
Surface water
Groundwater
Other*
Total Item 7
* If there is intake water from 'other',
specify the source.
8. Facility Water Use Estimate average
volume per day in thousand gallons
per day for the following types of
water usage at the facility.
(See instructions)
Noncontact cooling water
Boiler feed water
Process water (including contact
cooling water)
1078
107b
107c
107d
107e
107f
108a
108b
108c
Sanitary water
108d
Other`
108e
Total Item 8
108f
If there are discharges to 'other,
specify
108g
If there is "Sanitary water use,
108h
Burlington Industries. Inc. _
Wake Plant
XPUB Q PRV n BPP
FED
9701 Capital Boulevard
Wake Forest
Textile knit fabric bleaching, dyeing, and finishing
AGENCY USE
0
Not Applicable thousand gallons per day
3.500
thousand gallons per day
20
thousand gallons per day
20
thousand gallons per day
3.540
thousand gallons per day
Stormwater
5 thousand gallons per day
185 thousand gallons per day
3.310 thousand gallons per day
20 thousand gallons per day
20 thousand gallons per day
3.540 thousand gallons per day
Stormwater
800 people served
WakeAppl.doc

give the number of people served.
9. All Facility Discharges and other Losses,
Number
and Discharge (See instructions)Volume
Specify
the
number of discharge points and the
volume of water
discharged or lost from the facility according
to the
categories below. Estimate average
volume per day
in
thousand gallons per day
Number of Total Volume Discharged,
Discharge Points Million Gallons Per
Surface Water
109al
Da -
1 109a2 3,340
Sanitary wastewater transport syste
109bl
NA 109b2
Storm water transport system
10901
NA 109c2
Combined sanitary and storm water
109dl
NA 109d2
transport system
Surface impoundment with no
109e1
NA 109e2
effluent
Underground percolation
109fl
NAA__ 109f2
Well injection
109g1
NA 109g2
Waste acceptance firm
109111
NA 109h2
Evaporation
109il
Atmosphere 109i2 200
Consumption
109j1
NA 109j2
Other*
NA 109k2
109k1
Facility dischargers and volume
Total Item 9
10911
1 10912 3,540
*If there are discharges to'othee,
109ml
specify.
10. Permits, Licenses and Applications
List all existing, pending or denied permits,
licenses
and applications related to discharges from this facility (see instructions)
Issuing For Type
of
Date Date Date Expiration
Agency Agency Permit
or
Filed Issued Denied Date
Use License
ID Number
YR/MO/DA YR/MO/DA YR/MO/DA YR/MO/DA
NC DEHNR
>rz €z
........................
NPDES
NC0001376
95/3/1
NA
99/1/31
NC DEHNR
` ; r r t> ?
Air
2575R24
96/4/1
NA
01/3131
NC DEHNR
> J ?> ` >?_:
Land Appl
W00001
97/7/3
NA
02/6/30
11. Maps and Drawings
Attach all required maps and drawings to the back of this application. (see instructions)
12. Additional Information
WakeAppl.doc

STANDARD FORM C - MANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIAL
SECTION II. BASIC DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
Complete this section for each discharge indicated in Section I, Items 9, that is to surface waters. This includes discharges to municipal sewerage systems in which the
waste water does not go through a treatment works prior to being discharged to surface waters. Discharges to wells must be described where there are also discharges to
surface waters from this facility. SEPARATE DESCRIPTIONS OF EACH DISCHARGE ARE REQUIRED EVEN IF SEVERAL DISCHARGES ORIGINATE IN THE SAME
FACILITY. All values for an existing discharge should be representative of the twelve previous months of operation. If this is a proposed discharge, values should reflect
best engineering estimates.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SELECTED ITEMS APPEAR IN SEPARATE INSTRUCTION BOOKLET AS INDICATED. REFER TO BOOKLET
BEFORE FILLING OUT THESE ITEMS.
1. Discharge Serial No. and Name
a. Discharge Serial No. 201 a
(see instructions)
b. Discharge Name 201b
Give the name of discharge, if
any (see instructions)
c. Previous Discharge Serial No 201c
If a previous permit
application was made for this dis
charge (Item 4, Section 1) provid�
previous discharge serial
number.
2. Discharge Operating Dates
a. Discharge Began Date
If the discharge described below
is in operation, give the date
(within best estimate) the
discharge began
b. Discharge to Begin Date
If the discharge has never
occurred but is planned for some
future date, give the date the
discharge will begin.
c. Discharge to End Date If the
discharge is scheduled to be
discontinued within the next 5
years, give the date (within best
estimate) the discharge will end.
3. Engineering Report Available ...........: .
Check if an engineering report is
available to reviewing agency
upon request (see instructions)
4. Discharge Location Name the
political boundaries within which
the point of discharge is located:
State
County
(If applicable) City or Town
5. Discharge Point Description
Discharge into (check one)
Stream (includes ditches, arroyos)
Lake
Ocean
Municipal Sanitary Wastewater
Transport System
Municipal Combined Sanitary
and Storm Transport System
202a
001
Not Applicable NA
NA
1948 January
202b NA
YR MO
202c NA
YR MO
.....................Not Applicable
203 ❑
204a
204b
204c
l 205a
North Carolina
Wake
X❑ STR
❑ LKE
❑ OCE
❑ MTS
❑ MCS
204d
204e
204f

Municipal Storm Water Transport
System
Well (injection)
Other
If 'other is checked, specify type
6. Discharge Point - Lat/Long.
Give the precise location of the point of
discharge to the nearest second.
Latitude
Longitude
7. Discharge Receiving Water Name
Name the waterway at the point of
discharge. (see instructions)
If the discharge is through an outfall that extends
beyond the shoreline or is below the mean low
water line, complete item 8,
For Agency Use
35i
f>
8. Offshore Discharge
a. Discharge Distance from Shore
b. Discharge Depth Below Water
9 Discharge Type and Occurrence
a. Type of Discharge Check whether
the discharge is continuous or
intermittent. (See instructions)
b. Discharge Occurrence Days
per Week. Enter the average
number of days per week
(during periods of discharge)
this discharge occurs.
C. Discharge Occurrence- Months
If this discharge normally operates
(either intermittently or continuously)
on less than a year around basis
(excluding shutdowns for routine
maintenance), check the months
during the year when the discharge
is operating (see instructions)
Complete Items 10 and 11 if "intermittent" is
checked in Item 9.a. Otherwise, proceed to
Item 12.
10. Intermittent Discharge Quantity
State the average volume per dis-
charge occurrence in thousands of
gallons
11. Intermittent Discharge Duration
and Frequency
a. Intermittent Discharge Duration
Per Day State the average
number of hours per day the
dischargge is operating
b. Intermitfent Discharge
Frequency State the average
number of discharge occurrences
per day during days when
discharging
12. Maximum Flow Period Give the
time period in which the maximum
flow of this discharge occurs
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
❑ STS
❑ WEL
❑ OTH
205b
206a 35 DEG. 54MIN. 32SEC
206b 78 DEG. 33 MIN, 21 SEC
207a Neuse River
207b
207c
208a _ 30 feet
208b 1 foot
2090 X❑ (con) Continuous
❑ (Int) Intermittent
209b
6
days per week
209c
❑ JAN
❑ FEB
❑ MAR
❑ APR
❑ MAY
❑ JUN
❑ JUL
❑ AUG
❑ SEP
❑ OCT
❑ NOV
❑ DEC
210 1 NA thousand gallons per day
211a
211b
212
NA hours per day
NA discharge occurrences per day
From NA to
month months

13. Activity Description Give a
narrative description of activity
producing this discharge (see
instructions)
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
213a Greiae fabric will be bleached and scoured. It will then be
and finished before shipment to the customer as
finished fabric.
14. Activity Causing Discharge For each SIC Code which
describes the activity causing this discharge, supply the
type and maximum amount of either the raw material
consumed (Item 14a) or the product produced (item 14b)
in the units specified in Table I of the Instruction Booklet..
For SIC Codes not listed in Table I, use raw material or
production units normally used for measuring production
(see instructions)
214
214
a. Raw Materials
Maximum Unit Shared Discharges
b Products
Maximum Unit Shared Discharges
SIC Code Name Amount/Day (See Table I) (Serial Number)
I 1
(2)
(3
4
5
2257
Knit fabric
200
H-2 (1000 lb.)
001

15 Waste Abatement
a. Waste Abatement Practices 215a
Describe the waste abatement
practices used on this dis-
charge with a brief narrative
(see instructions)
b. Waste Abatement Codes I
Using the codes listed in Table
II of the Instruction Booklet,
describe the waste abatement
processes for this discharge in
the order in which they occur
if possible.
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
215b (1 )
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)_
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11 )
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
16. Wastewater Characteristics
Check the box beside each constituent which is present in the effluent (discharge water). This determination is to be based on actual
analysis or best estimate.(see instructions)
Parameter
Present
Parameter
Present
216
216
Color
X
Copper
X
00080
01042
Ammonia
X
Iron
X
00610
01045
Organic nitrogen
X
Lead
X
00605
01051
Nitrate
X
Magnesium
X
00620
00927
Nitrite
X
Manganese
X
00615
01055
Phosphorus
X
Mercury
X
00665
1 171900
Sulfate
X
Molybdenum
00945
01062
Sulfide
X
Nickel
X
00745
01067
Sulfite
Selenium
X
00740
01147
Bromide
Silver
X
71870
01077
Chloride
X
Potassium
X
00940
00937
Cyanide
X
Sodium
X
00720
00929
Fluoride
X
Thallium
00951
1 101059
Aluminum
X
Titanium
01105
01152
Antimony
X Tin
01097
01102
Arsenic
X Zinc
X
01002
01092
Beryllium
X Algicides*
X
01012
74051
Barium
X Chlorinated organic compounds`
01007
74052
Boron
Pesticides*
01022
74053
Cadmium
X Oil and grease
X
01027
00550
Calcium
X Phenols
X
00916
32730
Cobalt
X Surfactants
X
01037
38260
Chromium
X Chloride
01034
150060
Fecal coliform bacteria
Radioactivity
74055
74050
* Specify substances, compounds and/or elements in Item 26.
Pesticides (insecticides, fungicides, and rodenticides) must be reported in terms of the acceptable common names specified in Acceptable Common
Names and Chemical names for the Ingredient Statement on Pesticide Labels, 2nd Edition, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20250,
June 1972, as required by Subsection 162.7(b) of the Regulations for the Enforcement of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
17. Description of Intake and Discharge
For each of the parameters listed below,
enter in the appropriate box the value or code letter answer called for (see instructions)
In addition, enter the parameter name and code and all required values for any of the following parameters if they ere checked in Item 16:
ammonia, cyanide, aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium,
zinc, phenols, oil and grease,
and chlorine (residual).
Influent
Effluent
Untreated
In -Plant
Daily Minimum
Maximum
Frequency
Number o
Sample
Parameter and Code Intake
Treated
Average Value
Value
of Analysis
Analyses
Type
Water
Intake
Observed or
Observed or
217 (Daily
Water
Expected
Expected
average)
(Daily
During
During
average)
Discharge
Discharge
Activity
Activity
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
Flow*
3.5
3.33 1.10
4.64
1/1
278
24
Million Gallons per day
50050
pH
7.2
7.8
8.4
1/1
2781
G
Units
00400
Temperature (Winter)
11.81
18 9
23
1/1
112
G
"C
74026
Temperature (summer)
21.3
27 16
34
1/1
166
G
"C
74025
Biochemcial Oxygen
NA
6.1 2.0
16
1/1
278
24
Demand
(BOD 5-Day)
mg/I
00310
Chemical Oxygen
NA
112 78
183
1/1
278
24
Demand (COD)
mg/I
00340
Total Suspended
NA
16 5
61
1/1
278
24
(nonfifterable) Solids
mgA
00530
Specific Conductance
NA
2,000
4,800
3—f-7—or-1-177
63
G
micromhos/cm at 25*C
00095
Settleable Matter
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(residue)
mIA
00545
* Other discharges sharing intake flow (serial numbers) (see instructions)

FOR AGENCY USE
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
17 (Cont'd)
Parameter and Code
217
Influent
Effluent
Untreated
Intake
Water
(Daily
average)
1
In -Plant
Treated
Intake
Water
(Daily
average)
2
Daily
Average
3
Minimum
, Value
Observed or
Expected
During
Discharge
Activity
4
Maximum
Value
Observed or
Expected
During
Discharge
Activity
5
Frequency
of Analysis
6
Number
of
Analyses
7
Sample
Type
8
Ammonia (mg/l) 00610
_
_
2.77
0.86
4.23
1 /7
48
24
Cyanide (mgA) 00720
_
_
<5.0
_
1 /W5
1
24
Aluminum (mgA) 01105
_
_
271
_
1/365
1
24
Arsenic (mg/1) 01002
_
_
_
450
_
1/365
1
24
Beryllium (mg/1) 01012
_
_
<5.0
_
11365
1
24
Cadmium (mgA) 01027
_
_
<2.0
_
1/365
1
24
Chromium (mgA) 01034
_
_
<5.0
_
1/W5
1
24
Copper (mg/1) 01042
_
_
_
137
_
1/365
1
24
Lead (mgA) 01051
_
_
<10
_
1/365
1
24
Mercury (mgil) 71900
_
_
<0.2
_
i /365
1
24
Nickel (mg/1) 01067
_
_
<10
_
1/365
1
24
Selenium (mgA) 01077
_
_
<10
_
1/365
1
24
Zinc (mgA) 01092
_
_
92
_
1/365
1 1
24
Phenols (mgA) 32730
_
_
1.4
1.1
1.8
201
24
G
18. Plant Controls Check if the following
plant controls are available for this
discharge
ARemate power source for major
pumping facility
Alarm or emergency procedure for
power or equipment failure
19. Water Treatment Additives If the
discharge is treated with any
conditioner, inhibitor, or algicide,
answer the following:
a. Name of Material(s)
b. Name and address of
manufacturer
I
218
219a
219b
c, Quantity (pounds added per 219c
million gallons of water treated)
d. Chemical composition of these 219d
additives (see instructions)
❑ APS
❑ ALM

Complete Items 20-25 if there is a thermal discharge
(e.g., associated with a steam and/or power generation
plant, steel mill, petroleum refinery, or any other
manufacturing process) and the total discharge flow is
10 million gallons per day or more. (see instructions)
20. Thermal Discharge Source_ Check the
appropriate item(s) indicating the source
of the discharge (see instructions)
Boiler Blowdown
Boiler Chemical Cleaning
Ash Pond Overflow
Boiler Water Treatment -
Evaporator Blowdown
Oil and Coal Fired Plants -Effluent
from Air Pollution Control Devices
Condense Cooling Water
Cooling Tower Blowdown
Manufacturing Process
Other
21. Discharge/Receiving Water
Temperature Difference
Give the maximum temperature difference
between the discharge and receiving
waters for summer and winter operating
conditions (see instructions)
Summer
Winter 221 b
22. Discharge Temperature, Rate of
Change Per Hour
Give the maximum possible rate of
temperature change per hour of discharge
under operating conditions (see instructions)
23. Water Temperature, Percentile Report
(Frequency of Occurrence) In the table
below, enter the temperature which is
exceeded 10% of the year, 5% of the year,
1 % of the year and not at all (maximum
yearly temperature). (see instructions)
Frequency of occurrence
a. Intake Water Temperature 223a
(subject to natural changes
b. Discharge Water Temperature 223b
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
220
I
221a
—°F
222
24. Water Intake Velocity (see instructions) 224
I
25. Retention Time Give the length of time, in 225
minutes, from start of water temperature
rise to discharge of cooling water.
(See instructions)
NOT APPLICABLE
❑ BLBD
❑ BCCL
❑ APOF
❑ EPBD
❑ OCFP
❑ COND
❑ CTBD
❑ MFPR
❑ OTHR
°F
°F./hour
10% 5% 1 % Maximum
°F -F "F °F
°F °F °F 'F
feet/sec.
minutes

DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
26. Additional Information
II. 17. Flow, influent, contributing to discharge: from Neuse River = 3.5 MGD; from wells = 0.020 MGD
II. 17. Values for total intake water are listed in column (2) since 100% of all intake water is treated before use.
Source Treatment
Neuse River Coagulation, flocculation, settling, sand filtered, zeolite softeners
Wells Chlorination
II. 16. 1 Algicides (74051) from water treatment chemicals, as follows;
Product is Betz Entec 345A, it is a microbiocide containing 5% dibromo-nkripropinonamide (DBNPA)

FOR AGENCY USE
STANDARD FORM C - MANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIAL
SECTION III. WASTE ABATEMENT REQUIREMENTS & IMPLEMENTATION (CONSTRUCTION) SCHEDULE
This section requires information on any uncompleted implementation schedule which may have been imposed for construction of waste treatment facilities.
Such requirements and implementation schedules may have been established by local, State, or Federal agencies or by court action. In addition to
completing the following items, a copy of an official implementation schedule should be attached to this application. IF YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERAL
DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES, EITHER BECAUSE OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF AUTHORITY IMPOSING DIFFERENT
SCHEDULES (ITEM 1a) AND/OR STAGED CONSTRUCTION OF SEPARATE OPERATIONAL UNITS (ITEM 1c), SUBMIT A SEPARATE SECTION
III FOR EACH ONE.
Improvements
a. Discharge Serial Numbers 300
NOT APPLICABLE
Affected List the discharge serial
numbers, assigned in Section II, that
are covered by this implementation
schedule
b. Authority Imposing Requirement 301a
Check the appropriate item indicating
the authority for the implementation
schedule. If the identical imple-
mentation schedule has been ordered
by more than one authority, check
the appropriate items. (see instructions)
Locally developed plan 301 b
❑ LOC
Areawide Plan
❑ ARE
Basin Plan
❑ BAS
State approved implementation
❑ SQS
schedule
Federal approved water quality
❑ WQS
standards implementation plan
Federal enforcement procedure
❑ ENF
or action
State court order
❑ CRT
Federal court order
❑ FED
c. Facility Requirement Specify the 3-
character code of those listed below
3-character
that best describes in general terms
(general)
the requirement of the implementation 301 c
schedule and the applicable six -
character abatement codes(s) from
Table II of the instruction booklet.
If more than one schedule applies 301 d
6-character
to the facility because of a staged
(specific)
construction schedule, state the stage
(see Table II)
construction being described here with
the appropriate general action code.
Submit a separate Section III for each
stage of construction planned.
New Facility
NEW
Modification (no increase in capacity or treatment)
MOD
Increase in Capacity
INC
Increase in Treatment Level
INT
Both Increase in Treatment Level and Capacity
ICT
Process Change
PRO
Elimination of Discharge
ELI

2. Implementation Schedule and 3. Actual Completion Dates
Provide dates imposed by schedule and any actual dates of completion for implementation steps listed below.
Indicate dates as accurately as possible. (see instructions)
NOT APPLICABLE
Implementation Steps 2. Schedule
(yr/Mo/Day)
3. Actual Completion (Yr/Mo/Day)
a. Preliminary plan complete
302a
!
/
303a
1
/_
b. Final plan submission
302b
/
/
303b
c. Final plan complete
302c
/
/
303c
i
1
d. Financing complete & contract
302d
1
/
303d
awarded
e. Site acquired
302e
/
/
303e
f. Begin construction
302f
/
/
303f
g. End construction
302g
/
!
303g
/
1
h. Begin discharge
302h
_/
/
303h
I. Operational level attained
3021
/
/
303i
/
/

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED INFORMATION
NOT APPLICABLE
APPLICATION NUMBER
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER 001
REFER TO DIRECTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
Parameter
(Code)
(501)
Untreated
Intake
Water
(Daily
average)
In -Plant
Treated
Intake
Water
(Daily
average)
Daily
Average
Minimum
Value
Maximum
Value
Frequency
of Analysis
Number
of
Analyses
Sample
Type
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
REMARKS:
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this report and that to the
hest of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete and accurate.
Date Form Completed Name of Authorized Agent Signature

Direcdons - For each parameter listed, complete the information
requested in each column in the units specified according to the
instructions given below.
Column f - Enter the daily average value of the intake water at
the point it enters the facility. If intake water if from more than one source,
and enters the facility at separate entry points, the value given in column 1
should be weighted proportional to the quantity of flow contributed from
each source. If water is treated before use, completion of this column is not
required (see instructions for column 2). Values of intake are not required
for mining activities.
Column 2 - If all or part of intake water is treated before use,
provide values for total intake here instead on in Column 1, Also describe
briefly in item 26 "additional information," the type of treatment performed on
intake water (e.g., rapid sand filtration, coagulation, flocculation, ion
exchange, etc.) and the percent of intake water contributing to this
discharge that has been treated.
Column 3 - Supply daily average value for the days when
discharge is actually operating or is expected to be operating (a new
discharge). Daily average values are to be computed by weighing the daily
value in proportion to the daily flow. If a discharge occurs irregularly, the
value supplied in the column marked "Daily Average" should represent an
average for the average for the days the discharge actually occurs. Average
values are not to be supplied for pH, specific conductance, and
bacteriological parameters (e.g., coliform bacteria).
Columns 4 and 5 - Supply minimum and maximum value
observed (or expected for new discharge) over any one day when the
discharge is operating.
Column 6 - Specify the average frequency of analysis for each
parameter as number analyses per number of days (e.g., "3/7" is equivalent
to three analyses performed every 7 days). If continuous, enter "CONT."
When analyses are conducted on more than one individual grab sample
collected during the same day, the analysis frequency should reflect one
analysis whose value is the average of the individual grab sample
measurements. Average frequency should be based on an operating
month.
Column 7 - Specify the number of analyses performed at the
average frequency specified in column 6, up to 365.
Column 8 - Specify sample type as follows:
G For grab sample (individual sample collected in less than 15
minutes).
#C For composite sample # is to be replaced by the average
number of hours over which the composite sample was collected.
Composite samples are combinations of individual samples
obtained at intervals over a time period, either the volume of
each individual sample is directly proportional to discharge flow
rates or the sampling interval (for constant volume samples) is
inversely proportional to the flow rates over the time period
used to produce the composite.
NA If "CONT" was entered in column 6.
Ana"dal methods - Appendix A contains all parameters with
their reporting levels, test descriptions, and references. The parameter
values can be determined either by use of the standard analytical methods
as described in table A or by methods previously approved by the EPA
Regional Administrator or Director of a federally approved State program (or
their authorized representative) who has jurisdiction over the State in which
the discharge occurs. If the test used is not one shown in table A, the test
procedure should be referenced in "Remarks" or on a separate sheet.. If
values are determined to be less than the detectable limits (as determined
by referenced standard analytical techniques and/or instrument
manufacturer's literature), specify "LT(Value of detectable limit)" in the
appropriate space. For example, if the detectable limit is .005 mg/1 and
quantities of less than this are determined, specify "LT.005." Do not enter
descriptors such as "NIL," "TRACE," "NEG," etc. for this purpose. If it is
your reasoned judgment that one or more of the required parameters is not
present in the initial untreated or treated process water and/or the
discharge, enter an "A" (meaning "absent") in the appropriate space.
In order for values reported to be representative, it is
recommended that they be based on from at least five to seven analyses of
composite samples(if applicable). Each of the composite samples should
be obtained by compositing frequent samples in proportion to flow over an
operating day. Samples should be taken during period of maximum
production, if possible. If samples are taken at periods of less than
maximum production, state in "Remarks" the percent of maximum
production that was obtained during the sampling period.

ffi
m RESEARC & ANC yTicA
- LAbORATOR9* S, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
29 July 1992
Mr. Tim Holland
Burlington Industries, T,nc.
Wake Finishing Plant
9701 North Blvd.
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dear Mr. Holland:
Enclosed please find the results for the nnual Pollutant Analysi of
the sample frcm Wake Finishing Plant, Wake Forest, North Carolina submitted
to our laboratory on 24 June 1992.
If you should have any questions of need any additional information
concerning this report please so advise.
Sincerely,
RERCH & ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
James M. Cheshire
President
JMC/jf
enclosure

Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requiremont
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
Facility Information:
NPDES Permit No: N/A Discharge (Pipe) No: Year: _ 1992
Facility Name: Burlington Industries,,Tja e�For�� S: N/A County:
Person(s) Collecting Samples: George Simms
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical. X Yes __ No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: Research & Analytical Laboratories Inc.
Sam,.;Iing:
24 hr composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction
d
Page 1 of 9
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Sampling begun (date, time): 6/24 92 Yes
Sampling finished (date, time): 6/25/92 X No
Date and time sampled (grab sample): 6/25/92
Instructions
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
;r the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
ampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
rganic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
arforming the analysis.
? - indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling In the space provided on the form.
naiysis
a • Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, Including those to be Identified and approximately quantified under the 10
gnificant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
my with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), Read and distribute to the laboratory
5rforming the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 • Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in Item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
•ionitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GClMS library search. Tentative identification is all that is required; confirmation by standard
election is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
eporting
3 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
:on Limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity forsample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
n within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
or this purpose.
7 • If a chemical Is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or 'L ') the quantitation limit
3 the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
:tan the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quan-
:.ation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
ne total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction In the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
. units of micrograms per Ilter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be Identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
re observed, enter "none" In the space provided for "other" compounds In each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
.on estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
3 It "significant peaks" are found, provlde probable molecular-welghl, library match probability, retention time,.ldentlficatlon basis, and
iS scan number for each. In addition, list Internal standards and their retention times.
9 In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), Include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
peeling condltions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
- Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
?presentative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
. - Mai: two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTt4: Central Files,
Nr. ncurtR Pr) Rnx �F . Rara,nh Nr, 274U-4. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring

A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method �24_
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction Q
Fraction STORET Number 84085
S T ORET Compound Ouantitatlon Quantitation
Number Limit Target Limit"
Pollutants to be analyzed for: (ug/1) (ug/1)
34210 Acrolein 100 100
34215 Acrylonitrile 100 100
Concentration
Detected
(ug/1)
<l0o
<100
Page 2 of 9
GC/MS
Confirmation?
Yes No
x
34030
Benzene
5
5
<5
32101
32104
34413
32102
34301
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
5
- 5
10
5
6
5
10
5
5
<5-
<10
<
<5
x
x
34311
Chloroethane
10
10
<10
x
34576
32106
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
10
5
10
5
<10
<5
x
x
34418
32105
34496
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
10
5
5
10
5
<10
<5
x
x
34531
1,2-Dichloroethane
5
5
<5
x
34501
1,1-Dichloroethylene
5
5
<5
x
34546
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
5
5
<5
x
34541
1,2-Dichloropropane
6
34704
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
5
<5
x
34699
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
5
<5
x
34371
Ethylbenzene
8
5
<5
x
3423
Methylene chloride
5
341516
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
7
5
<5
x
34475
Tetrachloroethylene
5
5
<5
x
34010
Toluene
6
5
<5
x
34506
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
5
5
<5
x
34511
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
39180
Trichloroethylene
5
5
<5
x
34488
Trichlorofluromethane
10
10
<10
x
39175
Vinyl chloride
10
10
<10
x
If different from quantitation limit target

B. Acid Extractable Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected In Fraction 0-
Fraction STORET Number 45582
Page 4 of 9
STORiET Compound
NLinib-rar
Quantitatlon
Limit Targ®t
Quantitation
Lirnit'
Concentration
Detected
GC/PAS
Confirmation?
Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes I No
`s4452
I 4-Chloro-3-meth I henol
10
10
<10
x
34566
2-Chloro henol
10
10
<10
x
34601
2 4-Dichloro henol
10
10
<10
x
2 4-Dlmeth # henol
10
10
<10
x
t4616
2 4-Dinitro henol
50
,4657
2-Meth y 1-4 6-dInItro p henol
50
50
<50
x
�4591
2-Nitrophenol
10 1
10
<10
x
4646
4-Nitrophenol
50
50
<50
x
9032
Pentachloro henol
50
50
<50
x
4621
dliferent from quantitation limit target

2. Other acid extractabies (up to 10 highest peaks) No other peaks identified
C
U E
Z
tr
q �+
y a
C
O
Gf
W Ci -
C Ci
7
O L
C Q
cc v
U cc
w _m
C
C U
C7
� U
cc U
o CD
J t
C
O
� C
CD m
m E
CrI--
U y,
iu
v
Ca O
A CL
J
C
� O
O
E c o,
® :3
U .�
C
Lu O
U
CD s
L
Cd U
O 9 O
Oj
CL �
v
c
E
O
U
w
N
m
a
LD
N
T.?
f:
n
a
E
0
U
.0
m
.m
Im
as
c
0
C
A
C
O
_m
m
Cl
E
0
U
Page 5 of 9
c
O m
'c E c
�E
tx
Co
c
N
0
C

+C;ganic Analytical Information: rage got 9
,a-flc Fraction
Method
Extraction
CC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes)
—
Batch
Continuous
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, CWT1er Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
L
Compound
Recovery
° a
geable
60m,0.75 l, 1urn
Vha
1,2-Dichlozo-
A
65
94°C, 6°/min 200°C, 4*/min
Toluene
7
( 10 ruin)
•1-13rom -5
Pe
d Extractable
625
X
30M X 0.32 mm, 0.25µm
itro nze0
DB-5, tie 30 cm/sec, 40° C
2-oro-
96
(4 min) 270°C, 100/min
4-Ter -
122
91hieutral Extractable
See Above
2-Fluorophenol
84
Phenol d6l
143
214 6-T ibromo-
` .
mple: Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, D13•5,
He, 30 cm/sec, 40°C (4 min)
270°C, 1001min
d5 • phenol
50
IMS Library size (number of relarence spectra): 43,000
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected In Sample 5
Fraction STORET Number 78240
0RET Compound
Jumber
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitatlon
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
ollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
1104
Aluminum
50
50
271
097
Antimony
50
50
<50
1002
Arsenic
10
50
<50
012
Beryllium
25
.027
Cadmium
2
2
<2
034
Chromium
5
5
<5 I
042
Copper
2
2
137
1051
Lead
10
10
<10
1900
Mercury
0.2
1067
Nickel
10
10
<10
i 147
Selenium
5
10
<10
077
Silver
5
5
<5
.092
Zinc
i0
10
92
(her Inorganics:
007 1
Barium 500 l00
<100
�940
Chloride 1000 1000
11,000
i720
Cyanide 20 5
<5
951
Fluoride 100 100
350
lifferent from quantitation limit target
rti�,al Laboratory Representative: _—
���� C��� `. Date:
ity Orprat-, In Resnonsihle Charne (ORC):------_------.__--_—__--

625
C. Bas ,,/�jeutral Fraction, EPA method_
i3umber of chernicals detected in Fraction 1
Fraction STOPET Number 45583
STORET Compound Quantitatlon
Number Limit Target
Pollutants to be analyzed tor:
3405 Acena hthene
34200 Acena hth lene
34220 A nthracene
39120 _ Benzidine
34526 Benzo(a) anthracene
34247 Benzo (a) rene
(ug/1)
10
10
10
50
10
10
34230
Benzo (b fluoranthene
10
34521
Benzo hi a lame __
10
34242
Benzo (f< fluoranthene
10
34278
Bis(2-chibroethox )_methane
10
10
10
10
10
34273
34283
39100
Bis(2-chloroeth I ether
Bis(2-chloroisooro I) ether_
Bis(2-ethylhex I)y phthalate
34636
4-13romo hen 1 hen I ether
34292
Butyl bent i phthalate
10
34581
2-Chlor2na hthalene
4-Chloroohenyl phenyl ether
Ch sene
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
10
10
10
10
10
10 —
10
20
10
10
34641
34320
34555
34536
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
_ 34563
34571
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
34631
3,3-Dichiorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimeth 1 phthalate
34336
34341
39110
Di-n-but I Phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
34611
34626
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10�
10
34596
Di-n-octyl hthalate
34346
1,2-Di hen Ih drazine
10
34376
Fiuoranthene
10
10
34381
Fluorene
39700
Hexachiorobenzene
10 _
10
10 '
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
34391
Hexachforobutadiene
Hexachloroc cio entadfene
Hexachioroethane
34386
314396
34403
indeno 1,2.3-cd rene
3440E
Iso horone
Naahthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimeth lamine
N-nitroso-di-n ro lamina
34696
34447
34438
34428
34433
N-nitrosodi henylamine
10
34461
34469
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
10
10
Page 6 of 9
Quantitation
Concentration
GCIPd1S
Llr,.lt•
Detected
Confirmation?
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
50
<50
x
30
10
<1
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<1010
:c
1
<10
X
..
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
(J
<10
X
Q<10
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
20
<20
x
10
<10
x
10
2
x
x
10
<10
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
l
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<l0
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
i
10
<10
x
10
<10
X
--
10
<10
x
10
<10
x
—1
< 11 r)
x

2. Gli13r bas3lr: utrals (up to 10 high©st peaks)
C t0 rh
E Ln o
rn o
z
tB T
en d
O
� Q
ro io
c
c iv
o L
c
R —
U C3
�
_ �
C
C U
© m
'fl L
U
Z` L
� U
ca k
J �
G P N O
O �
C m
CD
Ocj
L
U y
E o Ln
a`.
J
C
� O
m
E cm
o
_ m
cn U
o 0
a rI
W C
O
U
`m
L
� U �
A m
_m
O
co
4J
c v
3 O
EO O 'o
U c 'D 7
G -rl I
f;
I � �
U �
U 1
M 7_
i
11
Page 7 of 9
C
c �,
'C E C
o "
o
LO
Ln
r-
'r
tin
('I.^I
rn
o
r,
r
lO
r
r
,a
C
A
�
M
I
C
U
v
N
O
O
Ea)
oo
ra
0
I
I
C
O
O
Z
C
ri
rl
0
w
Ri
a)0
4
H
+1
.G
•ri
�
O.
�
41
tv
Q
-P
m
rt
r+
i
1--
C
G
>
.>1
rl
Z
4
a
U
a.

U. OrCa.ncctilc)rine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 00158
STORET
Compound
Quantitation
Ouantitation
Concentration
Number
I Limit Target
Limit'
Detected
Pollutants
to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Drganochlorine
Pesticides/PCB's: EPA Method
Aidrin
al ha-BHC
8080
0.05
0.05
0.5
0.5
<0.5
<0.5
39J30
319337
39338
Beta-BHC
Delta-BHC
Gama-BHC LindaAe
m
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.5
0.5
•5
<0.5
<0.5
< "
34259
3940
?
39350
Chlordane
0.2
1.0
<1.0
39310
4 4'-DDD
0.1
0.5
<0.5
39320
4,4'-DDE
0.1
0.5
<0.5
39300
4 4'-DDT
0.1
0.5
<0.5
39380
Dieldrih
0.02
0.5
<0.5
34361
Endosulfan I (alpha)_0.1
<0.5
_
34356
Endosulfan II (betal
0.1
0.5
<0.5
34351
Endosulfan sulfate
0.7
0.5
<0.5
_
39390
Endrin
0.06
0.5
<0.5
34366
Endrin aldehyde
0.2
0.5
<0.5
39410
He tachlor
0.05
0.5
<
39420
Heptachlor epoxide
0.8
0.5
<0.5
39490
Methox chlor
0.5
0.5
<0.5
39755
Mirex
0.2
0.5
<0.5
39400
Toxaohene
2.4
34671
PCB 1016
0.5
5.0
<5.0
39488
PCB 1221
0.5
12.5
<12.5
39492
PCB 1232
0.5
5.0
<5.0
39496
PCB 1242
0.5
5.0
<5.0
39500
PCB 1248
0.5
7K
39504
PCB 1254
1.0-<2.5
39508
PCB 1260
1.0
2.5
<2.5
Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method 8080 -
3S560 Demeton 2.5
39540 1 Parathion (ethyl) 0.6
Pace 8 OI n
Coll lirrnation-
Dual Column GC/MS
Yes No I Yes j No
©M©
©mow
©-©
MIME
©MS
©_®
MME
©ICI©
MIME
E. Herbicides, EPA Method RI Sn
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
_ 0 --
Fraction STORET Number 00148
STORET Compound
Ouantitation
Ouantitation
Concentration Confirmation?
Number
Limit Target
Limit'
Detected Dual Column
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
39730
2,4•D
12
5.0
< 5.0
39045
Silvex
2
2.5
<2.5
x
Ig74n
2 4 ..5-T
2
2.5
<2.5 -
Y!
x

SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., WAKE FOREST, NC
FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF STABILIZED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE ON
FARMLAND AT AGRONOMIC RATES
JUNE 22, 1998
I. INTRODUCTION
Burlington Industries, Inc. is currently under contract with Environmental Waste Recycling, Inc.
(EWR) to provide sludge management services. EWR mobilizes their equipment once per year,
or as needed, to remove, transport and land apply drying bed sludge to farmland at agronomic
rates in Franklin County under Permit No. WQ0001462 (renewed in July, 1997). There are
currently 216.8 acres of land under permit.
A detailed plan is kept on file at our office and with the NC-DEM. Below is an outline of the
information contained in the plan. A copy of the entire plan can be provided if needed.
II. OUTLINE OF PLAN INFORMATION
A. GENERAL
This section contains general project information including the State of North Carolina Sludge
Management Permit Attachment A and Form: LARS 4/91. The Spill Control Plan is
included in this section. Also in this section is an explanation of the treatment process.
B. CURRENT PERMIT
C. ANALYSIS
This section contains the EPA Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure analysis (TCLP)
and a total sludge analysis.
D. SITE
This section contains information on the fields identified for sludge applications: topographic
maps, serial maps and a vicinity map. Also included is information on the soil types and hand
auger boring investigations. Detailed information on the soils is located in the SOIL section.
The completed NC-DEM Agreement for Land Application of Waste Sludge to Private Lands
can also be found in this section.
E. AGRONOMY
This section contains the Agronomist Report including loading rate recommendations for
nutrients and dry tonnages/ac for each site.
F. SOILS
This section contains the Soil Scientist Report including loading rate recommendations for
nutrients and dry tonnages/ac for particular soils found at the site. Also, the soils analysis
performed by A & L Agricultural Labs are located in this section. A detailed description of
each soil type existing on each site is found in this section including profile descriptions.

Page 2 of 2
III. OPERATIONS
A. PLANT SITE
Liquid sludge will be pumped into sealed tank trailer and tractor units and transported to the
permitted sites. Dewatered sludge will be loaded onto a leakproof transport/application
vehicle and transported to the site.
B. FIELD
An EWR project manager will contact the farmer to schedule applications. Prior to spreading
operations, the project manager will flag the site according to the buffer zones listed in the
permit. While flagging the site, a suitable off loading area will be selected by an EWR project
manager (i.e. away from sensitive areas like ponds drainage area's, homes, excessive slope)
where sludge can be transferred from a tanker to the liquid application vehicle. If dewatered
operations were utilized, the sludge would be deposited in the field and then loaded by a front
end loader to the spreader vehicle. Depending on availability, a combined, liquid or cake
transport and application vehicle may be used. Sludge will be surface applied on hay and
pasture and on sites with adequate cover. If a cover crop does not exist, the sludge will be
incorporated with the soil. The sludge will be spread at predetermined rates specified under
permit conditions.
C. ACCESS CONTROL
Since the sludge will be applied to private lands, no trespassing is allowed on any of the sites.
Fencing will be in place to allow for cattle rotations if necessary.
D. REPORTING
A report showing the date, dry tonnage, cubic yards/gallons, field numbers, acres and pounds
per acre applied of nutrients and metals will be generated for each application event. Copies
of these reports will be retained by Burlington Industries and submitted to the farm operators
by EWR. An annual report will be generated as required in the pernut.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HONG KONG
KNOX V ILLE, TENNESSEE
MCLEAN, VIRGINIA
CRAIG A. BROMBY
INTERNET MAIL: [e-mail]
Donald L. Safrit, P.E.
Chief, Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Permit transfer
Dear Don:
HUNTON SIC WILLIAMS
P. O. Box log
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27602
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]
[phone]
January 30, 1998
NEW YORK. NEW YORK
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
RICHMOND. VIRGINIA
WARSAW,POLAND
WASHINGTON. D.C.
FILE No.: 53654.000002
DIRECT DIAL: [phone]
This letter clarifies my letter of January 30, 1998, based on our discussion of February 10,
1998. You indicated that the bullet in the above -referenced letter, regarding the affect that
compliance history may have on transfer of the permit, could be somewhat misleading.
Generally, if the Division were to reject a transfer based on poor compliance history, no permit
would be issued at all, thus mooting the issue of transferability of load allocation.
Sincerely yours,
s
Craig A. Bromby
CAB:ds
c: A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Steven J. Levitas, Esquire
�l� i 3�yRCE ef�p,NCH

ATLANTA. GEORGIA
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HONG KONG
KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE
McLEAN, VIRGINIA
CRAIG A. BROMBY
INTERNET MAIL: [e-mail]
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
P. O. Box log
AALEIGH. NORTH CA&OLINA 27602
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]
[phone]
January 30, 1998
VIA FACSIMILE (733-9919)
FOLLOWED BY HARD COPY
Donald L. Safrit, P.E.
Chief, Point Source Branch
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Permit transfer
Dear Don:
FGN i SOURCE BRANCH
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
WARSAW. POLAND
WASHINGTON. D.C.
FILE No.: 53654.000002
DIRECT DIAL: [phone]
This letter confirms our discussion this morning regarding the interaction of permit
transfers and the Neuse NSW Rules. You indicated that a permit transfer can be handled as a
minor modification to the permit'and that the flow and load allocation are transferred with the
permit. Our discussion assumed the following facts:
• My client has proposed to purchase a plant facility located within the Neuse Basin;
• An NPDES Permit has been issued to the Facility; and
• The NPDES Permit allows a daily flow of 5.0 million gallons and contains an effluent
limitation for ammonia nitrogen;
Based on the Division's interpretation of the Neuse NSW Rules, as applied to the facts of this
transaction, I understand the following to be true, :
• If the NPDES permit issued to the Facility is conveyed as a part of the transaction, my client
would not be considered a new permittee under the Neuse NSW Rules;
• The NPDES permit can be transferred to my client by way of a name change or minor
modification to the permit;

HUNTON 8c WILLIAMS
Donald L. Safrit
January 30, 1998
Page 2
If a transfer of the NPDES permit to my client is effected, my client, as permittee, would be
entitled to discharge at the same flow and nitrogen load currently allocated to the Facility;
and
• If the Division determines that my client has a poor compliance history with regard to
environmental permits, the Division could elect to require an application for a new permit, in
which case the flow and nitrogen load allocations would not be passed to the new permittee.
If my client provides to the Division information regarding past environmental permit
compliance history in advance of the closing of transaction, the Division will be able to assess
whether there will be any problem regarding transfer of the permit. This understanding is, of
course, contingent on the discovery of additional information indicating poor compliance history
which had not been disclosed to the Division.
Please review this summary and let me know as soon as possible if any of these
understandings are incorrect. As you are aware, resolution of this issue can significantly
influence the value of the Facility and is therefore very important to my clients in considering the
transaction.
Sincerely yours,
4.
6x-"-t
Craig A. Bromby
CAB:ds
c: A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Steven J. Levitas, Esquire