20081832 Ver 1_Emails_20100618 (2)

Lucas, Annette
From: Levitas, Steve [[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 5:04 PM
To: Lucas, Annette
Cc: Mcmillan, Ian; Travis Crissman; 'Bob Zarzecki'; Gary J. McCabe; Michael Weeks; tapipkin1
@yahoo.com
Subject: SE 40
Attachments: COR Response 2-18-10.pdf; h+e existing conveyance. pdf; COR Comments Trans 266448 -
Approved 3-1-10.pdf; Permit Set (without details)6-11-10.pdf; H+E Site - Rip Rap Calcs.pdf;
H+E Site - Restored Conveyance Calcs.pdf; H+E Site - Q10 Runoff Calcs.pdf
Annette -- As we discussed the other day, the City of Raleigh has approved the construction and stormwater management
plan for the development on Lot 9 at SE 40 based on the fact that stormwater will be discharged to an existing
conveyance and will enter the buffer at non-erosive velocity. I am attaching the following relevant documents to to
support this conclusion and document the City's action:
1. COR Response 2-18-10.pdf: Comment/response letter from owner's engineer to City of Raleigh regarding how to
meet Neuse Riparian Rules (comment/response 16).
2. h+e existing conveyance.pdf: County topographic illustration of existing topo.
3. COR comments Trans 266448 - Approved 3-1-10.pdf: Documentation of City of Raleigh approval.
4. Permit Set (without details) 6-11-10.pdf: Copies of plans approved by City (with city approval stamp on cover).
5. H+E Site - Rip Rap Calcs.pdf: Energy dissipater calculations for site discharges.
6. H+E Site - Q10 Runoff Calcs.pdf: H+E site discharge quantity calculations.
7. H+E Site - Restored Conveyance Calcs.pdf: Velocity calculations for restored conveyance.
My client remains committed to installing a level spreader (as depicted in previous submittals) to deal with the
concentrated flow being directed to Lot 9 from other parts of the development, but it is our position that a separate level
spreader is not required (either legally or practically) for the stormwater flow originating on Lot 9. If you agree with this
conclusion based on the attached information, we will formally submit this material as part of our response to the pending
request for additional information. Thanks for your help. I look forward to hearing from you. Steve

Steven J. Levitas
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Suite 400
3737 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27612
t 919 420 1707
f 919 510 6145
'his C9tTl 11 7SCatl of root fee z w r,-1lect 'on : c ri-3r kinu;ation e I'1(:2r1 t, )f the Eiectron!c t?CiiT10li1iltf, .:Ei3 S .5 ?wacu Act '18 U.S-C Section 2,51 and its disuinsuie Es
t i,:_y a t, t f ti rt, t:.er r t„ -. , d , 1.,i > ih , , his Yft s r? ,.?,:c; a n.l anv in,-,; ?,, nta r. co nh.de t!al ; t oq ev :. ie t p i ;He i inforrnatiorr
a 1oi .. 3th , r??1.?„! area i. - irltr, holier or u,;e 3t any of + c; h.t.,rm?. u; in o? < E ,.:i f,,d to ti ; is
E R!(- l_Y i _ pjeaFae, y by r{ ar n,.i ?r at J19 42f 1 ?:ncl Ss?.ar?,y tt t>rtit . t?..:r m ,,;r>n <a ;ls <att<.<i?rr?er?ts ?is
ta
"'DISCLAIMER"' Per Treasury Department Circular 230 Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein

4
,

f
f

H+E EQUIPMENT SITE
0 50 too 200 Feet

PIN 1721489414
Real Estate ID 0371473
Map Name 172106
Owner APMW LLC
Mailing Address 1 11030 RAVEN RIDGE RD STE 109
Mailing Address 2 RALEIGH NC 27614-8512
Mi I nq Address 3
Deed Book 11937
Deed Page 1490
Deed Date 05/01/2006
Deeded Acreage 6.49
Assessed Building
Value $0.00
Assessed Land Value $0.00
Total Assessed Value $0.00
Billing Class CORPORATE LISTING
Property Description L09 SOUTHEAST 40 CENTRE BM2010-134
Heated Area
Site Address 3821 GENEROSITY CT
City Raleigh
Township ST. MARYS
Year Built 0
Total Sale Price $0.00
Sale Data
Type and Use
Design Style
land Class
Old Parcel Number 659-
WAKE
COI INry
PIP RAP APRON DESIGN SHEET
Rip Rap Zone [delineation
Do, Depth of Flow (ft)
6,._,t._ aiYid.mY, sa Nn z a. c s• c•, na +z c- v.d4R?k,?,
Number of tJ p,eds.
..._ _
Daslr_;n ?!elOtaty, V,, r rn:fi
Eiinw a APSH ft?_
pipe D a ttTY?r. 'D r r
Stacie sue.„„ = acz r?. ,rt
Using NC`,DOT Rlp
Us Rar, Apron Decign
e. Zone ,
t
6 ft
.,
L.. 12 f?
vJ 6 (7 ??
W r: ? F'
Ci h.`.'+d '!I RfF RAP
USE` MINIMUM 13" STi NC THICKNFS&
M[At SIOW VMU! 540 f1
2,_! ft
' ^ I.?l.?„ir?i1 pQfllf
E3asP.d 00011 1
IlAsed ,p ,m i.
? -___
0.,tfFllPAUM
( ASS
( :iJNk
N D T PIP ..pmt a t
j or THI
Co+.+f4ere t k CKNFSS
ZUNE RAI 1AASS r
? f?hL 4fti I?

15?

X I
P
?
s e
?
?

1.1 ; ttr.All? L: aY<;?iac[C yn'"?
- L' P?ttN is veavan'?r.i i
v..L=
AI t phi`

4N 5, 1
...
R11-RAP
!',i 4ie?
f Y1llfi ( 1? :Rl {ph fiq (?.S.I li F
O "^ F 4? 5.. Y( f..N 1. l.; E
?
A*t
tpr: 5? C) 5 f
k 'hl k I d. 6 b_ 5 „?" I

E"'(' i >N CONTROL TON
+an c s ?r?y t
?
f =H 5'ifX`
I A-
L ;t ATI )iv ,'?( P
. _ d S
Rip Rap Zone Delineation
j
O
Dc:Si(3n Point

25
20
10
5
O 7fa?. {
0

i Do, Depth of Flow jft.)
Number oT rulvens
Dealar, Veiucity, V,, -e o a,y

Pipe Diameter. D,.

Using NCDOT Rip Rap Apron Design
/se. Zore
L; 6 k
Li 12 {t
W G.C. it
VV Fi 8 it
GLASS'B' RIP RAP
USE. MINIMUM 1$" STONE THICKNESS
TOTAI. STONt VOLUML= Fi4.Q R' 'Based upon 1
122.4 R' Tased upo7 I
0 ASS i STO dF f
NCM RIP OF Caef6 t (L, Coefh. t THICKNESS
2.ONL PAf CLASS ST F (ftL (ftj Irn
' Ii + ? c p
k n i
c 'K L 5 tf iH
S `I V :0 'M
( F 2 Y
I i?e? G {n+et t xs3 coral
!2 < ._..ix 7INn
N1r1 f y3+
RI RAP
I T-- ?
A,% -XAST I;
V1 4"i im, Ac?
2,3
I ?_ t?Arw r la a _ _ _.1
€f[[ rRC;r ON LONIr O 5 ONE
r ,r A & :
E. e
;?i
I ell
Aga
5 10 15 20 25
x
.r
3 n e 3 t n ._.. ? ,.?~"• ;.. ., ., z .. ...: .. .. ? _„{ „_ ,? :: ^?`m,s^,. r.'?r M1i'}+rtfia,RStr'r,, Y
City of Raleigh
Attention: Lindale !-fill
One Fxrnan-:fie Plaza Suite 30
Rafe>igh North Carolina 27601
Re: H+E Equipment Grading Permit
City of Raleigh Transaction# 266446
PLH'suant to the City of Raleigh Flan Review Cycle #1 comments for the Grading Pert-nit for H + E
Equipment project, located at :31321 Generosity Court, please find enclosed three (3) copies of
thP, resised l;l R, See :<rld or c_ ;a, ropy of revised Nitrogen C'alcrilations. Please note that the
address has been changed since the original submittal. Please update this i your system.
I l.av, rt: t ' Clt't€iro;v)d addressed t;ach d1r`ni orl thi§ plam-z cvld k flr`0ien response.
yro:.!, . vw,.,Vv of °Il'Se cloc.unients, he rE;1s`ievv, iyC?i"T men ,ts tars . l eat d bie:i`.'w (n
BOLD and my responses are presented to QED, The responses are also categorized fay
department and reviewer.
5TORMWATER REVIEWER: SUSAN LOCKLEAR [phone] 02/11/2010
1. In order to claim permanently protected, undisturbed open space, the area will
need to be recorded as such. Please include a map which identifies the areas
to be recorded as permanently protected, unmanaged open space.
As disr;i.assf?ra, t . rveyo, will t vise the recorded map to re act the 'fa r
ca r r . 14 t, r.aam +. "Permanently Prplans to tte Undisturbed Open Space"` prior to
'ti`&,R;'s$d7117 c$# .€.,9t3 ...s R. ? 4`. Xatrr?$t. #tl BdG «..d{$r to .r gt..+R>.-.. a)t r&
as awO. n'r n?s c-v f evisedplans,.
2. In nitrogen table, please separate the site areas from the right of way areas.
For example site impervious area, right of way impervious area for 1,11 the
roadway, sidewalks, etc..
;,¢ 1414.r xgen Cah-,!ations have boen revised to incltfde f,3r? hx peivious areas
t as space x: l# sated ror - of the Right of Way -dj 4..x=ra= to our project.,
3. Breaking this out may help clarify the discrepancies,
t7 marl" ! .,.E r as see rewsed M fi t.1 W175,
4. A map identifying the impervious areas claimed may be helpful,
as coat Inecessaryper the revised
1305-109 Durham Cyr+v€, Raleigh. NG 27k03 Offlee [phone] Fax, (919) T79-o826 www rte pc corn
r
?...<lrteering Relationships'
5. Provide a phased erosion control plan. Phase t should be for clearing and
grubbing. Phase 2 should be final grades with storm pipes, etc.
Qquegtr= , the erosion control plan has been reused to imi de phase
Construction Sequence- Please see revised plans,
6. The basin will need to be installed prior to the site inspection. This should be
addressed in the construction sequence for Phase 1.
The plans have been revised to include: ttae sediment basin prior to site
wspection r¢l hose 1 of the Construction Sep -4enca. Please s a revised
is the P-3 to be installed prior to the construction entrance? It so, it will need to
be a part of phase 1 with the remaining system to be installed in phase 2.This
should be identified in the construction sequences.
The plans have been revised to include the installation of P- in Phase
Construction Sequence. Please see revi sect plans,
8. Consider the use of slope drains in phase 1 to convey the runoff down into the
basin.
As discussed on the phone, given the expedited construction schedule of this
project, slope drains and diversion ditches are not anticipated to be raecess e
The rite is to be cleared, graded and stabilized within creeks and the
stormwater pipes shall he installed within f week of that time,
9. If used, provide appropriate detail for slope drains and diversion ditches.
i
10. Identity on basin detail that the baffles need to be either jute matting or coin
fiber.
As requested, the Sediment Basin Detail has been revised !o incjudf
net"Hi or Core titer battles. Please see re-vised plans.
11. Show silt fence outlet in plan view and provide a detail.
t 8. r e bvu-o Rw,;uded in plan view on Sheet CS. detail for
has been inci€rcleal on Sheet C9.-
12. The existing combo fence along the buffer will need to be replaced at a
minimum along the north side along the proposed basin.
As- discussed on the phone, the c-xistin Tree Protection Fc,'Icirly Is a"tt t
r itcreed to be used as an erosion control device and shall remain undisturbed
kvpw Sediment Fence and Controlled Outiets shall be installed ner r„ late, Pry
3305-149 Durharn Drove ? Raleigh, NC 27603 * Office (919} 779-5851 Fax (919} 779 0826 14 www rie-pc corn

1 3. Provide silt fence outlet and dissipater at outlet of skimmer.
Fence and, a t?t°troffed s l.lffef have £„;:n fa3'4ai? d d as regr'?este
t4. Consider showing a second construction entrance (off Virtuous) with the option
to block one access point at any time. The concern is that the contractor will
wasat to utilize the entrance off of Virtuous and it not being shown on the plans,
raafr ef"i to ?r'leot ri ,,f the t= s°`w x1s?, se e r' 1rB ire "fry:
11 16. It appears the orifice for the skimmer should be ", not 3". Tease revisit this
calculation. Staff i referencing Figure .64b of the NC Erosion and Sediment
Control Design Manual.
A;. 6¢ad:'uss d, a - orifice is ap °ar tafu for the s r" vok,:rne at the `astm
"p t iWat"Is ha ve, been #o-ia`11d.,;ale a ,Y ».0aaQ.° . -d. F11-sasI
M Provide a final grading plan that demonstrates the removal of the sediment
basin and how the Neuse Riparian Buffer regulations are being met. It is
assumed that the basin will be filled upon completion of construction, This
should be identified in the construction sequence as well.
€.'Xj ; Fd"T;. a: xlva , C tiG'c m£:=t 4:; r1'a{ `l io ih&
e rfl too. rawslorc-d once thrr s cdratC?nt haf:{rr is rerf7c,,v rt
for l rlde r tf ?' .s'? 'ral -e N$ v.se. F'4ive Sufffer° fly!es, ecause then; f an existing
€ x. uauf steam ,' as shalt dl;+a'.f i # e fffr' fr' this r?rt ;r cyance,
efrrr inaffr h= fr ae nee for level s readers or =,)H-er such devices, is re lrec-,ted. a
note fins feet-n gadded to the f onsfruc4f on equen p in div afirg that the
conwevance nim"I M restorers Upon I'etlaova of the f,i5esn basin, As
cf<, . u., sed. fie r.i .-.aurs for the Sediment f as4'€: shall r rrafir? on the G.%°zd rl
le... 4 or clarity c # .s .'lr#ion for the -ontrea for,
17. Feel free t r#t 4r$r,t me it you would like to discuss or need additional
c:lariflc"Mion of thr ,e comments,
f?ff ,.=' E:.?i F rr.'rtwr .. f `o- this C.ornina ii
16. Further review required.18.
'ak aK '.°`;a a :°oll rtaq fol this cry plie;i
3305-109 Durham Drive Raieig?l „ N(s 27603 a Office [phone] % Fax [phone] wvuur.Hee r)c_com
R Engineering
Urie j veering Relationships"
rRANSPORTATION REVIEWER: RENE HAAGAN [phone] 02112.'2010
1. Remove Public Works detail 20.01
?.,, ? €aestelj, erotic Works Of has been rernovpd from', Me Plarrs.
2. Show detail 20.21 for curb and gutter and detail 20.31 for residential street
section for your driveway entrances.
3. Install a HC ramp on the north part of the driveway onto virtuous street.
'?WVP IL D t-t :? .c #` aaT"#
#'estvus Street, as weft as ralli 5 oil either side of (tie driveway onto $; nerosily
'"€. sr$ ir?zssg ?s?ca rsava`crr:.r1?s^sa°
i nanx you rcr yof.fr review comments ano asslstanc:
require further information, please feel free to ca
oarv.mccahefi?)rle-nc com
Heraar
Gary J. McCabe. P.E.
Red Line Engineering, P.C.
305 109 Durham Drive 10 Raleigh, NC 27603 Otfice [phone] v Fax [phone] www rfe-pc crlm
10 ''r'P storm Event - Restorod Conveyance
,,,Vorksheet for .t_riangr.rlar C?l??r°7nel
Project Description
Project File cahaestadlfmWIrsoutheas.fm2
Worksheet Restored Conveyance
Flow Element Triangular Channel
Method Manning`s Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope O.005000 ft/ft
Left Side Slone 15-000000 H V
Right Side Slope 15.000000 H V
Discharge 21.56 cfs
Results
Depth O.ftS ft
Flow Area 10.89 ft?
ettt d F'em eteq "5 ?<' ft
I op Width 25.56 ft
Critical Depth 0.55 ft
Critical Slope 0.019003 fttft
Velocity 1.98 ftfs
Velocity Head 0.06 ft
Specific; Energy 0.91 ft
Froude Number O53
Flaw is subcritical.
Cross Section - Restored Conveyance
Cross Section for Triangular Channel
Project Description
Project Fife ?'t,c stadlfrr? s?+ thcns.frra?
Worksheet Restored Conveyance
Flow Element Inangular Channel
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Channel Depth
Section Data
Mannings Coefficient 0.030
Channel Slope 0.005000 ft/ft
Depth 0.85 ft
Left Side Slope 15.000000 H V
Right Side Slope 15.000000 H : V
Discharge 2156 cfs
0.85 ft
1
V L
H 1
NTS
FARE VS. POST DEVEI._ PMENT RLJN-OFF (10 YR. STORM
DATE hire <t : ,
PN IECI H„ E tu+rfi_4,1
CE C,RIPT ON POSI M V[:I Ot'1,ff NI RUNOFF - 10 YFAf ;RFA
POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF [EIIILRE SITE)
j.
.
-.. P ist Development C _ A (ft') A (ac)
1
L
,_.. HUH[)IrRi Ct ). E 22506
i 052
? PARKiN.. 0 arZ 8€ 370 i 98
3 f,ON ;IM VVAI K0, G 95 i
. C3
4 GHAVfr.. 095 ?
. Q tvl)
1
M ISt. STRUCTURES
095
' ,'2u ,
0,G
F GRFS:, 025
. 16+119 fi .; u}
rweightedC j .53
0
Total Area _
_ 8T.748 649
Impervions Area 1 t? F.i4i' ( ? 59
?perccnt impervious 3,# 9g;,
€'.C3S1 DEVLLOPMENT RUNOFF i 0 RESiQRED Gt7NVEYANC L)
westDeve?cpment *, h its) (c)
(3UILDO1 i 0 5 C 21 )0 0'
?.
2 PARKIN(, ? 095 ? 86,170 .f M
3 _ GONG 1310FWALKS_ 095 1,25? 0,03
4 GRAVFf 0 95 6 0 00
MISC. SIRUCtt311E:S
-.. i (11 911
.. ( 2,720 ? ()076

0
i
GRAY;
6 x
9.
':'Weight"d
etai Area a)." 334 ( f03
'Impefv ous Area 111 ?d£,;r 7 r °JG)
percent lrnpervnus .. 55 2?,,
Noic I'e{(:?)Y3f°^. of Raleiqh,t{ef..ausep arentsite co{ltams100year floodplam.
site is exempt f-rr. *?ionflon.
SHEET 1 fl.. 1
DF SIGN fly ("IN
CHF(;KE D BY GAI
G=riA
i - 7.22 infix (10 yr Stunn)
C Weighted C
A= rota{ area in acres
IQ'- ?A.81 cis..)
Q=CiA
r 7.22 wgir (1€) yr. Sto'm)
C - Weightedt
A - TcAal area in satires

IF v'fe, cvefG ??aSS,
?t c.r1 Q? u . 4- 7
6/16'/2010
plan review: Plans Review Results
Plan Review Comments
Flan Review Comments Search
Flan Review Results:
This is an incomplete listing of your review for this project. Do not bring any revisions pertaining
to this review. If revisions will be required, a complete listing of review comments will be faxed or
emailed to the project contact person upon the completion of this review cycle.
NOTE:
Once all review trades are approved and there are no outstanding administrative issues such as
map recordings, contractor licensing information, etc., it could take up to three (3) days before
your project will be ready for permit pick-up. Your project contact person will be notified via fax,
email or phone.
Transaction Contact
266448
GARY MCCABE
Number: Person:
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Grading 4 2 acres _ For Construction of site improvements (water,
Review Type sewer, parking areas. storm pipes, etc) for future 22500 sf building and
Description: 2720 sftruck wash. Financial Responsibilityform and StormwaterCalc's
in folder with permit application.
Plan Address: 3821 GENEROSITY CT
Started
Review
Group Created: 02/04/2010 Plans 02/04/2010
03/01/2010
Routing: Approved:
Final Review Permits
03/03/2010
03/03/2010
Approved: Issued:
Review Cycle - 3 Started - 02/24/2010 Completed - 03/01/2010
Trade Status Reviewer Date
STORMW ATER
Review Cycle - 2
raleighnc.gov/.../PlansReviewResults...
1/3
Plan Review
Home Plan Review Permits Inspections Administration Feedback
6/16/2010 plan review: Plans Review Results
Trade Status Reviewer Date
STORM W ATER
1 Provide a phased erosion control plan, notjusta construction sequence.Phase 1 should be
a separate plan sheet for clearing and grubbing. Phase 2 should be a separate plan sheet for
final grades with storm pipes, etc..
2 Remove #7 and #8 from the construction sequence..
3 Identifywhen the inlet protection should be installed..
4 Provide a detail for the curb inlet protection, block and gravel and proprietary, if preferred.lf a
proprietary device is shown, provide installation and maintenance information on plans.lfthe
proprietary device is installed and fails to perform, a standard device will be required to be
installed..
5 NCDOT has a preferred detail for a silt fence outlet which utilizes #57 stone.Please revise
plans to reflect DOT detail..
UNRESOLVED
SUSAN LOCKLEAR
[phone] 02/22/2010
TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONALLY APPROVED RENEHAAGEN 02123/2010
[phone]
1 Approved for grading.The building plans will be reviewed once submtted for final permits..
Review Cycle -1
Trade
Started - 0210412010
Status
Completed - 02118/2010
Reviewer Date
STORMWATER UNRESOLVED SUSAN LOCKLEAR 02111/2010
[phone]
1 In order to claim permanently protected, undisturbed open space, the area will need to be
recorded as such.Please include a map which identifies the areas to be recorded as
permanently protected, unmanaged open space..
2 In nitrogen table, please separate the site areas from the right of way areas.For example site
impervious area, right of way impervious area for 112 the roadway, sidewalks, etc..
3 Breaking this out may help clarifythe discrepancies..
4 A map identifying the impervious areas claimed maybe helpful..
5 Provide a phased erosion control plan.Phase 1 should be for clearing and grubbing.Phase 2
should be final grades with storm pipes, etc..
6 The basin will need to be installed prior to the site inspection.This should be addressed in
the construction sequence for Phase 1..
7 Is the P-3 to be installed prior to the construction entrance? If so, it will need to be a part of
phase 1 with the remaining system to be installed in phase 2.This should be identified in the
construction sequences..
8 Consider the use of slope drains in phase 1 to convey the runoff down into the basin..
9 If used, provide appropriate detail for slope drains and diversion ditches..
10 Identify on basin detail that the baffles need to be either jute matting or coir fiber..
11 Show silt fence outlet in plan view and provide a detail..
raleighnc.gov/.../PlansReviewResults... 2/3
6/16/2010
plan review: Plans Review Results
12 The existing combo fence along the buffer will need to be replaced at a minimum along the
north side along the proposed basin..
13 Provide silt fence outlet and dissipater at outlet of skimmer..
14 Considers howing a seco rid construction entrance (off Virtuous) with the option to block one
access point at anytime.The concern is that the contractor will want to utilize the entrance off of
Virtuous and it not being shown on the plans..
15 It appears the orifice for the skimmer should be 2", not 3".Please revisit this calculation.Staff
is referencing Figure 6.64b of the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Design Manual..
16 Provide a final grading plan that demonstrates the removal of the sediment basin and how
the Neuse Riparian Buffer regulations are being met.lt is assumed that the basin will be filled
upon completion of cons truction.This should be identified in the construction sequence as
well..
17 Feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss or need additional clarification of these
comments..
18 Further reivew required.18
MORG
FIRE PROTECTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BRIAN 7MORG 6702AN 0210912010
1 No permit issued.
URBAN FORESTRY CONDITIONALLY APPROVED MARY METCALF 02/1812010
[phone]
1 An administrative hold is placed on this project until tree protection fence has been re-
inspected by Mary Ann Metcalf [[phone]] prior to issuance of grading permit..
2 A set of the last submitted plans must be on site at the time of inspection.
ZONING (SITE REVIEW) APPROVED PATRICK ONEAL 02/05/2010
[phone]
1 Urban Forestry plan reviewer will check to make sure that conditon #1 of S-41-2006 is met
concerning tree conservation plan and tree protection fencing..
TECHNICAL SERVICES APPROVED ROTONDA MCKOY 02/05/2010
[phone]
TRANSPORTATION UNRESOLVED RENE HAAGEN 0 211 212 0 1 0
j [phone]
1 Remove Public Works detail 20.01..
2 Show detail 20.21 for curb and gutter and detail 20.31 for residential street section for your
driveway entrances..
3 Install a HC ramp on the north part of the drivewayonto virtuous street..
City of Raleigh I Disclaimer
raleighnc.gov/ ... /PlansReviewResults...
3/3