20201326 Ver 1_401 Application_20201124

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
November 13, 2020
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Put
RECEIVED
NOV 2 4 2020
NCDEQIDWRINPDES
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP#39 for the 46.51-acre 6890 Konica Dr Facility
project, in Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Wojoski,
We submitted the following PCN for a NWP 39 for the above mentioned project electronically
to USACE. It has been received and assigned as SAW-2019-01264. I've enclosed a check for the
application fees in the amount of $240.00.
Please contact me at 828-699-3697 or jeff.levi@wetlands-epl;.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
i
Jeff Levi,
Biologist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. [e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
1
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville. NC 28805

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2019-01264 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 6890 Konica Dr Facility
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and B3e]:
Commercial development in Guilford County
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Intersect Greensboro I LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Jeff Levi c/o Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B 1 b]:
36.05927,-79.579246: 46.51 acres located at 6890 Konica Drive, Whitsett, NC. 27377
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: PIN: 8824808917-000, Parcel #: 217642
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Guilford
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Whitsett
11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Little Alamance Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Cape Fear / 03030002
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 39
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning
November 13, 2020
Mr. David E. Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Assigned Project Manager
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Ms. Sue Homewood
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP#39 for the 46.51-acre 6890 Konica Dr Facility
project, in Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Homewood, and Messrs. Bailey, Wojoski, and assigned project manager for USFWS,
Enclosed is a Request for Nationwide Permit # 39 for the 6890 Konica Dr Facility site on +/-
46.51 acres located at 6890 Konica Drive, Whitsett, NC. 27377. The site is a proposed
Commercial development consisting of one wetland totaling approximately 0.014 acres and
three streams totaling approximately 1,064 linear feet. A preliminary jurisdictional
determination request (SAW-2019-01264) was previously submitted, field reviewed by USACE
(David Bailey) and NCDWR (Sue Homewood) on 08/20/2019, and approved by USACE (D. Bailey)
on 05/07/2020. Please note that the ownership of the property and the project applicant has
changed since the JD review. The project name switched from CA Global Spec to 6890 Konica
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville. NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail] 1

Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Dr Facility. Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination and Approvals sections for
information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include impacts to one wetland
for fill, and grading in order to accommodate the building and needed parking. Overall impacts
to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site
selection location, design, and location/orientation of the proposed access routes. The total
permanent impacts proposed include 0.014 acres of wetland impacts (Wetland Y). It was not
possible to avoid impacts further due to the terrain, the centralized location of the wetland and
the resulting fill required to accommodate the building and associated parking.
Efforts of impact minimization were implemented during the design to preserve the existing
hydrology and limit adverse effects to existing, onsite natural habitat. The applicant has
demonstrated substantial avoidance and minimization efforts in which 100% of the 1,064 linear
feet of stream channels will be avoided. This includes directional boring of a utility line under
Stream Z with no proposed impacts to the stream or its buffer. Due to the minimal impacts
including 0.014 acres of wetland impacts, no mitigation is being proposed.
Enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please
contact me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
i
Jeff Levi,
Biologist
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville. NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail] 2

C
O
u
a
a
Q
.E
L
0-
Permit Application

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
6890 Konica Dr. Facility
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Whitsett
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Intersect Greensboro I LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
008317-01046
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Scott Brown
3d.
Street address:
1266 West Paces Ferry Rd, STE 181
3e.
City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30327
3f.
Telephone no.:
678-984-6675
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jeff Levi
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c. Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28227
5e. Telephone no.:
828-699-3697
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8824808917-000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.05927 Longitude:-79.579246
1 c. Property size:
46.51 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Little Alamance Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
03030002 - Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of a mixture of forested areas with maintained clearings/fields. General land use in the vicinity consists of commercial and light
industrial developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.014
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,064
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of grading, fill, and BMPs for a commercial development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, dump trucks, track hoe, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PJD Request approved 05/07/20 (SAW-2019-01264
)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): J. Levi & P. Kealy
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A PJD request was submitted and field verified by USACE and NCDWR on 08/20/19 (SAW-2019-01264). See JD section for details.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.014
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.014
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the location of the on site wetland, opportunities to avoid this area is limited. Impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed
development were minimized through site selection location, design, location/orientation of the building, associated parking areas and access routes.
Relocation of utilities, specifically a fiber optic line, will be completed by directional boring avoiding all impacts to Stream Z.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
El Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
50.1 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan is being reviewed by Guilford County and is
designed
to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Guilford County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Guilford County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater, on the site be transported to the nearest reatment facility via sewer lines.
generated will
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no protected species were identified. A UE/Protected species evaluation
report is included with this submittal.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fah habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.nedcr.gov/hpoweb/
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http:/Igis.guilfordoountync.gov/guilfordjs/; www.fema.gov
Jeff Levi
J
11-13-2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning
Aunt Authorization Letter
S. Rindner,
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: 6890 Konica Dr Facility
Property Address: 6890 Konica Drive, Whittsett, NC 27377
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 0217642
Select one: I am the current property owner
Name: 5 GOOFY L- io;t d V t4
Company: �l`�i C-+�� L �.�t�1..at� Ya r- 9-1 t C7t20,S'
Mailing Address: Houirpu- M '&-L. R 0 - SVITS 6 a
1�T "riA op -or 3 D b i $
Telephone Number: __
6'?0- [ 9>y' 1♦♦0 b% S
Electronic Mail Address:
c
Buyer* / Other`
� r,4viscc4"- c, Cv ✓vi
10 / A q/Ra
Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
I Jill
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. 1
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
IenxindnerQwetlands-epg.com 2 amanda JonesCai)wetiands-epg.com

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
SG o"r; G-, `i T4*%Aq
Print Name
Capacity: 19 wner ❑ Authorized Agents
10 Act I Zao
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
HI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional
Determination & Approvals

WAS
Perennial Stream A
Project Boundary
(- 900 LF, 0.06 acres) — Limits of Study
4 - (+/- 46.51) f
-- --- ,f.
VOW
y* ,a
�►
? f
lk
� 1 r
! Y/ k Stream )j
Form 3� a 4
Intermittent
t Stream X
78 LF, 0.009 acres)
Intermittent Stream Z r
(- 86 LF, 0.006 acres) 4f
0 r � x a
Wetland Data 4 " ' ,
Form (DPI) t`
Stream 7
Form
c (DP4) ' Culvert ,
66 e_
Wetland Y Stream ' _ 8 t
` •� Form �» ', •
acres)
A
MON
�l Stream
•
Form
LEGEND (DP5) M
rV Non -Wetlands Waters
® Wetland:
Photo location and direction Field Verified by
Q Project boundary study limits USACE and/ NCDEQ
on 08/20/2019
LOCATION 1:4,000
Lat: 36.059489 2N 0 187.5 375 750 ft
vv
Long:-79.579038 2W 0 55 110 220 m
HUC: 03030002 (HAW)
Acres: 6890 Konica Dr. Facility Drawn by: Reviewed by:
+/- 46.51 Guilford County, NC PJK JAL
FIGURE 1
Date: Approximate Wetland Map Prepared for:
07102119 For survey and study purposes only Intersect Greensboro I LLC
Rev 11105120 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification 1266 West Paces Ferry Rd, STE 181 r
Atlanta, GA 30327

Guilford County, NC
LOCATION
Lat: 36.059489 2N
Long:-79.579038 2W
HUC: 03030002 (HAW) r,)
Acres:
+/- 46.51
FIGURE 2
Date:
07102119
Rev11105120
6890 Konica Dr. Facility
Guilford County, NC
TAX PARCEL MAP
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
two
- . y.
1-
1:4,000
0 187.5 375 750 ft
0 55 110 220 m
Drawn by: Reviewed by:
PJK JAL
Prepared for:
Intersect Greensboro I LLC
1266 West Paces Ferry Rd, STE 181
Atlanta, GA 30327

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01264 County: Guilford U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Gibsonville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Leonard S Rindner PLLC / WEPG
Attn: Jeff Levi
Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
Size (acres) —45.51 Nearest Town Whitsett
Nearest Waterway UT to Little Alamance Creek River Basin Cave Fear
USGS RUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.059270.-79.579246
Location description: Theyroiect area is located on the south side of Konica Drive, ayaroximately 0.7 mile west of its
intersection with NC Highway 61, at 6890 Konica Drive, in Whitsett. Guilford County, North Carolina. Theyroiect area is
shown as the red -outlined "Project Boundary Limits of Study" on the fieure entitled "Approximate Wetland Map."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be
sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map
dated 8/20/2019. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including
wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated _. We strongly suggest you
have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this
survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

SAW-2019-01264
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David E. Bailey at [phone] X 30 or
David.E.Bailev2na,usace.a rmvmil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary iurisdictional determination form dated 05/07/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not aaalicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: 2020.05.07 09:14:05
-04'00'
Date of JD: 05/07/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not aimlicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Chaim Piekarski, Konica Ventures, LLC, 114 Tived Lane East, Edison, NJ 08837
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105

VPer',eonnial Stream A
(- 0 LF, 0.06 acres)
M' r -w- �—
r1
1
Intermittent Stream Z
( 86 LF, 0.006 acres)
r�rar
Wetland Y
(- 0.014 acres)
Project Boundary
r _ _ Limits of Study
(+/- 46.51)
1. AL.
Stream
Form 3 = 4
(DP3) e w ti
Intermittent
Stream X
78 LF, 0.009 acres)
1;lif04• �M Upland
Form
Wetland Data
Form(DPl) �.+i..a�•
Stream .• /
7 Form �1
.`, 6 �.i�� (DP4)
x • Stream -
Form "A
4
Stream
LEGEND
#0%&I Non -Wetlands Waters
® Wetland
0' Photo location and direction
Q Project boundary study limits
LOCATION'
Lat: 36.059489 °N r
r
Long:-79.579038 2W
HUC: 03030002 (HAW) ri
Acres:
+/- 46.51
FIGURE 1
Date:
07102119
CA Global Spec
Guilford County, NC
Approximate Wetland Map
For survey and study purposes only
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
F
9
�J Field Verified by
USACE and/ NCDEQ
on 08/20/2019
1:4,000
0 18T5 375 750 ft
0 55 110 220 m
Drawn by: Reviewed by:
PJK JAL
Prepared for:
Konica Ventures LLC
114 Tived Lane East
Edison, NJ 08837

SAW-20 t 9-0 t 264
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
QU R APPE
Applicant: Leonard S Rindner PLLC / WEPG Attn: Jeff Levi File Number: SAW-2019-01264 Date: 05/07/2020
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑X
1 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://ww\v.usace.anm .mil�Missions, CivilWorks/Rei;ulatoryProaramandPermits.asi2x
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. -
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2019-01264
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
k
SECTION II - RE UE'� Ok APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PPRMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
DINT OF CONTACT P-MMSTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
if you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David E. Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 5/7/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Patrick Kealy c/o Wetlands and Environmental
Planning Group, Leonard S. Rindner PLLC, 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550, Charlotte, NC, 28277
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME AND NUMBER:
SAW-2019-01264 (CA Global Spec / 6896 konica Drive / Guilford County / Whitsett NC)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 6890 Konica Drive.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Guilford City: Whitsett
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.059489 Longitude:-79.579038
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Alamance Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 8/20/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
degrees)
degrees)
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non -
may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Wetland Y
36.05829900
-79.57951500
0.014 acres
wetland
Section 404
Intermittent
36.05751700
-79.57829200
78 linear feet
non -wetland
Section 404
Stream X
0.009 acres
waters
Intermittent
36.05949900
-79.58118600
86 linear feet
non -wetland
Section 404
Stream Z
0.006 acres
waters
Perennial
36.06066800
-79.58147900
900 linear feet
non -wetland
Section 404
Stream A
0.06 acres
waters

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types
of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not
requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the
JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all
terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an
official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area,
or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"
waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area,
and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity,
based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated
for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: CA Global Spec_ApproxWtldDelin_aerial_070219_
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑x Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24K Gibsonville NC quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Guilford County 1977 Sheet 30_
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: CA Global Spec_NWI map_070519_
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): CA Global Spec Aerial maR2018
or ®Other (Name & Date):Representative Landscape Photographs 04/17/19, 06/05/19
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): LiDAR (NC Floodmaps)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Date:
2020.05.07
08:45:33-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
DATE
, a- �-, 07/02/19
Signature and date o erson requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 764A832r-36CC-4ADD-oumi-87EB9F6F989C
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 25, 2019
Mr. Jeff Levi
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
1070 Tunnel Rd
Building 1 Suite 10
PMB 283
Asheville, NC 2885
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
Subject Property: CA Global Spec, Guilford County
Dear Mr. Levi:
On August 20, 2019, at your request, Kelli Park and I conducted an on -site determination to
review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the
above noted state regulations. David Bailey with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was
also present during the site visit.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the
USACE. The attached initialed and dated map accurately depicts all stream determinations
conducted during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. In addition, the
Jordan Lake Buffer Rules may apply to some streams at this location, please be sure to contact
the local government for further information regarding the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this
decision in any future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination
shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated
Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1650. Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 3001 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
oenuve.m a e�wo�s�w aaar
336.77b.9800

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B4A832F-3BCC-4ADD-86A1-B7EB9F6F989C
Authority that "exempts" surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby
notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The Division recommends that
the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in
a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B
of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does
not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their
associated buffers. If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please
contact Kelli Park at 336-776-9698 or [e-mail]
Sincerely,
ED63109BF4*11
sge.a e,,
E #o,�eell
...
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Stream/Wetland Location Map
cc: David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office

Perennial Stream A .;*� Project Boundary
(- 900 LF, 0.06 acres) _ -- Limits of Study
_R-
`n
W: a
1�,. - `
. � � � � R �
2
i'
e
i k
Stream ` _ do
y' Form 3 4
(DP3)
Intermittent
' Stream X
78 LF, 0.009 acres)
Intermittent Stream Z� �
(� 86 LF, 0.006 acres) k1 ��r
t r
Upland Data ��'•�� l�b;;
Form(DP2)
Wetland
Form (DP3)
Iq
7 Stream
4 Form
Culvert
(DP4) x,
Wetland Y ti- Stream 8
n t 1 Form ►° ' -.
(- 0.014 acres) , +.. (DP6) r• aka11
.'. .
Stream
a Form .� N 10 h
LEGEND (DPS) `
I'\I Non -Wetlands Waters
® Wetland
Photo location and direction Field Verified byUSACE and/ NCDEQ
Q Project boundary study limits 3. on 08/20/2019
LOCATION A j Ds 1:4,000
Lat: 36.059489 2N kA 0 187.5 375 750 ft
Long:-79.579038 2W 9/19/2019 0 55 110 220 m
HUC: 03030002 (HAW)
Acres: CA Global Spec Drawn by: Reviewed by:
+/- 46.51 Guilford County, NC PJK JAL
FIGURE 1
Date: Approximate Wetland Map Prepored for:
For survey and stud purposes only Konica Ventures LLC
07/02/19 y y p p y 114 Tived Lane East + • ' �
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Edison, NJ ane

Contact Name *
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name *
Project County*
Owner Address:*
Is this a transportation project?*
Jeff Levi
[e-mail]
Intersect Development Group
Konica Industrial
Guilford
Street Address
The Forum at West Paces
Address Line 2
3290 Northside Parkway, Suite 825
Uty
Atlanta
Fbstal / Zip Code
30327
r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
R 401 Water Quality Certification - r 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
f Individual Permit f Modification
f Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
SAW-2019-01264
State / Rovince / Fegbn
GA
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood / Kelli Park
Please give a brief project description below.*
The forthcoming PCN will be a request for Nationwide Permit #39 for the
Konica Industrial project located on 46.5 acres at 6890 Konica Drive,
Whitsett, NC 27377. The site is a proposed industrial development
consisting of one wetland totaling approximately 0.014 acres and two
streams totaling approximately 164 linear feet. A preliminary jurisdictional
determination was submitted and field -verified by David Bailey (USACE),
Sue Homewood (NCDWR), and Kelli Park (NCDWR) on 08/20/2019 and
was approved by USACE on 05/20/2020. The proposed plan will include
0.014 acres of permanent impacts to one wetland with no stream impacts
proposed.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
10/21 /2022
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Konica Drive Overview.pdf 782.34KB
PCff cI,ry
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
[�B�aiCt-zc
Submittal Date 9/29/2020

`wJ
Plans/Exhibits

EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Total Project Area = +/- 46.51 ACRES
Wetland Impact / Preservation Summary
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
Guilford County, NC
Prepared For: INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
Prepared By: Thomas & Hutton
Date: October 28, 2020
Stream
Length
Wetland
FILL
NEW
(linear
Wetland Size (square
FILL
(linear
EXCAVATE
PRESERVE
BIfffER
RLL
Item
Wetland Number
feet)
She (acres) feet)
(acres)
feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(CY)
WE
TLAND ETLAND 1
0.00
0.014
610
0.014
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
775.00
Total
0.00
0.014
1 610
1 0.014 1
0.00
0.00
1 0.00
1 0.00
776.D0
LEGEND
SITE DEVELOPMENT FILL
EXISTING WETLAND
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
T THOMAS
IMPACT SUMMARY
'"' H U T T O N
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
1020 Euclid Avenue
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
Charlotte, NC 28203 • 980.201.5505
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 1
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1"= 1'
www.thomasandhutton.com

�r
p
EX SANITARY
SEWER
LAKE MACKINTOS,�
BASE FLOOD ELV. 557.00
PER SURVEY COMPLETED BY
ALLEY, W1112AMS CARMEN &
KING, INC.
EX WATERLINE
EX NATURAL GAS ■ �° °
EX UNDERGROUND
FIBER OPTICS i !
I
NOW OR ■
B■00 LLC
■
P8, 179-tilm 17i-7G
PIRCSL (89'76a
■M IONIC! D I 'N'
11fAf3b7T, N.C. 27377977 ■ �
INTERMITTENT STREAM 'Z' .
t377 SF (0.009 AC) I
t86 LF ;
WITH 50' BUFFER '
`-----------
WETLAND 'Y'
t610 SF (t0.014 AC
CITY OF BURLINGTON PROPERTY
LAKE MACINTOSH
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 2
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1"= 300'
• 14
' C
I
C
1 ,
Igo ;
INTERMITTENT STREAM
t427SF (0.011 AC)
t78 LF
WITH 50' BUFFER
g,' I
- N
I
-- �- \--
_ _ _ -
-X DEOVERHEA
POWER
T THOMAS
Im -&
HUTTON
1020 Euclid Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28203 - 980.201.5505
www.thomasandhutton.com

E
T
n
u
v
PROP. ATaT^20' UTILITY
EASEMENT RELOCATION
ALIGNMENT KONICA
v—
a
D' q
N q
ttEEEE
aE�
�:
EX NATURAL GAS
EX WATERLINE
PROP. ATaT 20' UTILITY
I EASEMENT RELOCATION
11 ALIGNMENT'
C
PROPOSED
BUILDING
200' DIRECTIONAL BORE
UNDER THE EXISTING
_ INTERMITTENT STREAM Z [
WITH NO IMPACT TO THE
_— — — — STREAM OR ITS BUFFER
EX.30' �I
SSWR ESMT i
� II
WETLAND IMPACT 01
WETLAND Y
/. 0.014 ACRES
610 S0. FT.
EX. SANITARY I
SEWER OHF
SHEET 5 I
�_
PROPOSED
STORMWATER
POND
11
�IIT I
I
• I EX. 50'
—� —
I0I POWER ESMT
71) l
/FES #Z
_S
I I FIR: 601.07
— J
— — — — — —
I0 INV. IN: 598.82 (N)
I
Y l!>Ow.
OO LDC A'� QOOZY 35�8
HSO,LN!}IO{Oy 8MY7 8 J
L EX OVERHEAD
POWER
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 3
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1'= 300'
T THOMAS
14 - &
HUTTON
1020 Euclid Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28203 • 980.201.5505
www.thomasandhutton.com

/- Ill IIII I (I N I \
PROPOSED \BUILDING
FIFE: 627.0
I I \
WETLAND IMPACT 01 \ \\1 1 I
— ' WETLAND Y \ \ \ I I I \ 1
0.014 ACRES
610 SO. FT. I f
n I •r
626 \ \ I\ 1\ IIII I 1 I I 1
0IIIIII\I�I11\ 1 1 \
\625'
6111
i_/ PRE DRIV
j I
o �
C�
i
615
\ \ 1
\ 605 \ \\ \ \ \ 1
595�
\ \ \\\ \\
11 I I I \ \ \ 1 I \ \\\ \ \ \ \\\ \
1 I \ \\\\
=-
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
SITE PLAN - WETLANDS
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 4
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1'= 40'
T THOMAS
HUTTON
1020 Euclid Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28203 • 980.201.5505
www.thomosandhutton.com

• PROPOSED GRADE
•
o
i
• ;
IL
�
/�
. •
M 0
INES
j
0
0
0 0
0
0010000
'
Immom
0,
0
0
0:
. • •
/
j
l
. ego
I
immmm
•
' •
GRADE
iEXISTING
585
0111111
0+00 1+00 1+50
WETLAND 1 CROSS SECTION
STATIONS: -0+55 - 1+50
SCALE: HORZ.: 1" = 100'
VERT.: 1" = 10'
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
NATIONWIDE WETLAND PERMIT
CROSS SECTION
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 5
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1"= 100'
T THOMAS
HUTTON
1020 Euclid Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28203 • 980.201.5505
www.thomosandhutton.com

W.
11
11
►IN �I I ` � -
j1c(J I , i I •,�,
a� L SHEET 5
EX.30- i � WETLAND PACT #1
P JISSWR ESMT 111 WETLAND Y
0.014 ACRES
j� 610 SO. FT.
c
ps.
nm�FUTURE
R. .
CONNECTION
-...
BUILDING_
i�
EX. 50'
h POWER ESMT
X �J— 1 \�~ /� FOREBAY
* ( I I'11I
PROPOSED
EX SANITARY \ . STORMWATER
SEWER \ ��L ��� \ / POND
OUTFACE PIPE
env •� �, - — �' - yam..—�,a_.. ( ' ".
cueos�m°" rsrr. at
00 Is nav a ais all
l��� axv� ig EX OVERHEAD
TOTAL SITE AREA: 46.5 ACRES POWER —
IMPERVIOUS BUILDING 8i PAVED AREA: 23.3 ACRES
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS: 50.1 X
6890 KONICA DR. FACILITY
STORMWATER & GRADING PLAN
CLIENT:
INTERSECT GREENSBORO 1, LLC
LOCATION: GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10-14-2020 DRAWN BY: NH SHEET: 6
JOB NUMBER: J-27783.0002 REVIEWED BY: WBS SCALE: 1"= 300'
T THOMAS
FqH-U TTON
1020 Euclid Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28203 • 980.201.5505
www.thomasandhutton.com

tr
Threatened & Endangered Species ~
Report

Wetlands and
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
6890 Konica Drive Facility
Guilford County, North Carolina
For
Intersect Development Group LLC
The Forum at West Paces
3290 Northside Parkway, Suite 825
Atlanta, GA 30327
By:
Jeff Levi
Biologist
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Field Evaluated: June 5, 2019 & October 17, 2019
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. [e-mail]
October 27, 2020
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. 1
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

OS90 honic�I /b / ix ilih lhr o/"Ile, / hI,h {,r ."d Prolrrledl.p ( ieN Ll'eIII lution
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The 6890 Konica Drive Facility site is approximately 47 acres and is located
south of I — 85, southeast of Konica Drive, and north of Little Alamance Creek
Whitsett, Guilford County, North Carolina (Figure 1). It can be found on the
Gibsonville, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map at a latitude of 36.0595 N
and longitude of 79.5790 W (Figure 2). The site consists of open mowed fields,
roadside edges, utility right-of-ways and wooded edges, disturbed oak -hickory
forest, and alluvial forest along stream valleys. The topography is moderately
sloped with the elevation ranging from approximately 550 to 660 feet.
Figure 1:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

6890 Konica Dr Facility Threatened Endangered Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2:
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/Guilford.html) was referenced to determine the potential occurrence of
Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for Guilford County, North
Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial
photographs were assembled and the site was investigated on June 5, 2019 and
October 17, 2019.
YYEEQ 2
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

6890 Konica Dr Facility- Areatened b7dangered Protected Species Evahtatioai
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Guilford County
County: Guilford. NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)
**Data search on May 30, 2019; October 16, 2019
Group Name Status
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus Endangered
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants Small whorled poQonia (Isotria Threatened
medeoloides)
Vertebrate Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Endangered
Vertebrate Roanoke loaoerch (Percina rex) Endangered
Vertebrate Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Protected under the
Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act
Two plant species with federal protection were included in the survey efforts:
• Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzil), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
• Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides), listed as Federally
Threatened, typically grows under canopies that are relatively open or
near features that create long -persisting breaks in the forest canopy such
as a road or a stream. It grows in mixed -deciduous or mixed-
deciduous/coniferous forests that are generally in second- or third -growth
3
Wetlands and
Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

6890 Konica Dr Facility Pireatened Endangered Protected Species Evaluation
successional stages. The soils in which it lives are usually acidic, moist,
and have very few nutrients.
A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially
occurring in Iredell County:
Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), listed as Federally
Endangered, is generally associated with gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrates, and has been observed in slow pools, riffles, and slow runs.
The species is known from tributaries and mainstreams of the Deep
River, Haw River, Rocky River and Cape Fear River in Chatham,
Harnett, Lee, Moore and Randolph counties.
• Roanoke logperch (Percina rex), listed as Federally Endangered,
typically inhabit medium -to -large sized warm, clear streams and small
rivers of moderate to low gradient. This species is known from portions
of the Chowan and Roanoke River basins within the ridge and valley,
piedmont, and upper coastal plain physiographic regions, including
recent collections in North Carolina in the Dan River, Mayo River, and
Smith River watersheds.
Bald eagles (Haliaeetus
Golden Eagle Protection
bodies of open water st
where there are suitable
roosting.
RESULTS:
leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Act, typically inhabit forested areas near large
ich as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers
fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
The site is characterized by open mowed fields, utility right -of ways (ROW),
roadside edges, and disturbed oak -hickory forest on slopes leading to alluvial
forest along stream corridors. The forested areas are dominated by mixed
hardwoods with some areas of dense pine. Areas along lower slopes and
valleys have a more mesic composition of species with some alluvial species
included.
The open areas including the utility ROW, roadside and wooded edges, and
open fields have no traditional canopy. Edges support smaller individuals from
the surrounding canopy including sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua), American
beech (Fagus grandifolia), and hackberry (Celtis sp.). Shrubs include blackberry
(Rubus sp.), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). Vines include Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Herbs dominate these areas and include
assorted agricultural grasses, goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Queen Anne's lace
(Daucus carota), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), southern crownbeard

6890 Konica Dr Facilirn 1hrealened Endangered Prolected Species Evaluation
(Verbesina occidentalis), wingstem (V. alternifolia), bush clover (Lespedeza sp.),
aster (Aster sp.), onion (Allium sp.), St. Johns Wort (Hypericum sp.), dogbane
(Apocynum cannibinum), wood oats (Chasmanthium latifolium), lopseed (Phryma
leptostachya), Agrimony (Agrimonia sp.), elephants foot (Elephantopus sp.),
milkweed (Asclepias sp.), mullein (Verbascum thapsus), starry rosinweed
(Silphium asteriscus), American burnweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), and rabbit
tobacco (Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium).
The disturbed oak -hickory forest has a canopy that includes yellow poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), oak (Quercus sp.), white oak (Q. alba), red oak (Q.
rubra), southern red oak (Q. falcata), post oak (Q. stellata), hickory (Carya sp.),
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), elm (Ulmus sp.), and white ash (Fraxinus
americana). Areas with dense pine include pine (Pinus sp.), short -leaf pine (P.
echinata), Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), loblolly pine (P. taeda), sweetgum, and
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana). The subcanopy supports red maple
(Acer rubrum), flowering dogwood (Corpus florida), eastern red cedar, redbud
(Cercis canadensis), American beech, southern sugar maple (Acer floridanum),
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), and transgressives. Shrubs include
Chinese privet, autumn olive, strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus),
blackberry (Rubus sp.), and American holly (Ilex opaca). Vines include grape
(Vitis sp.), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). The sparse herb
layer includes ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), Christmas fern
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), southern crownbeard, violet (Viola sp.), Japanese
stilt -grass (Microstegium vimineum), pipsissewa (Chimaphila maculata), grape
fern (Botrychium sp.), beggarticks (Bidens sp.), and bushclover.
Lower forested areas along stream valleys support a more alluvial assemblage of
plant species. These include American elm (Ulmus americana), American
beech, spicebush (Lindera benzoin), and southern crownbeard.
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
All potential habitats for Schweinitz's sunflower along woodland edges,
utility right-of-ways and roadside edges were closely examined. No
individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed.
All potential habitat for small whorled pogonia along open wooded areas
and edge communities was closely examined and no individuals of this
species were observed.
• The streams on -site were examined for the presence of Cape Fear shiner
and Roanoke logperch. No individuals were observed during the survey
nor would any be expected on -site.
5
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

6890 Konica Dr Facilitv Threatened bidangered Protected SErecies Evaluation
• There is potential habitat for bald eagles on the site along Little Alamance
Creek. No bald eagles were sighted during the survey nor were any nests
or nesting activity observed.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the results of the field evaluation the review of available data, we see
no potential for a 'Take' to occur to any of the protected species discussed within
this report. WEPG did not identify any protected species occurring on the subject
property. No further investigation of the presence of protected species on this
site is recommended at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeff Levi
Biologist
October 27, 2020
C.
---- ----------------
wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.