WQ0001800_Non-Discharge Inspection BIMS Report_20201125

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0001800 Effective: 09/10/20 Expiration: 02/28/22 Owner : Town of Yadkinville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Town of Yadkinville RLAP
County: Yadkin 1620 Fred Hinshaw Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Grant Trivette
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: LA,
Primary ORC: Michael Wayne Boone
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Yadkinville NC 27055
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification: 987521 Phone: [phone]
NC0020338 Town of Yadkinville - Yadkinville WWTP
Inspection Date: 11/09/2020
Entry Time 10:10AM Exit Time: 11:45AM
Primary Inspector: Jim J Gonsiewski Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503)
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Sampling
II Land Application Site Pathogen and Vector Attraction Transport
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 5

Permit: WQ0001800 Owner - Facility:Town of Yadkinville
Inspection Date: 11/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On November 9, 2020 staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office (DWR)
performed an announced routine compliance inspection of the Town of Yadkinville's residuals land application program. This
inspection was conducted by DWR staff member Jim Gonsiewski. Mr. Alex Fox of Synagro was present during this
inspection. The inspection reflects compliance with the permit.
Two tankers(6,200-gallon tankers, Numbers 53-471 and 53-566 transporting residuals from the WWTP to the land application
Site (NC-YK-33-02). .
A rain guage was observed in the field. A sign was visible on the fence. The terrain was slightly hilly with the slopes ranging
from 2% to 6%. The solids content in the residuals was 1.58%. The field was properly flagged. No runoff or ponding of
residuals from previous spreading was observed. One 4,200 gallon truck spreader (Number 520231) was applying residuals.
The O&M plan and the permit were present. The O&M plan was adequate. Each truck and tanker had an O&M plan and
maps. The residual spreading was good. No additional run off or ponding was observed. Proper buffers were maintained.
Observed transfer of residuals from tankers to the spreader truck. No problems noted.
At WWTP observed loading of from the 250,000 gallon sludge tank. No spillage or staining of the
asphalt or tracking of residuals out of the WWTP observed.
Page 2 of 5

Permit: WQ0001800 Owner - Facility:Town of Yadkinville
Inspection Date: 11/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Distribution and Marketing
Land Application
Record Keeping
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required?
Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters?
Are there any GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is a copy of current permit on -site?
Are current metals and nutrient analysis available?
Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters?
a. TCLP analysis?
b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)?
Are PAN balances being maintained?
Are PAN balances within permit limits?
Has land application equipment been calibrated?
Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization?
Are there pH records for the land application site?
Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place?
Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary?
Are hauling records available?
Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date?
# Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window?
Comment:
Pathogen and Vector Attraction
a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B)
Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram
Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only)
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram
b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A)
c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B)
Temperature corrected
d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day)
Yes No NA NE
El
•
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
❑ ❑•❑
Page 3 of 5

Permit: WQ0001800 Owner - Facility:Town of Yadkinville
Inspection Date: 11/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
e. Time/Temp on:
Digester (MCRT)
Compost
Class A lime stabilization
f. Volatile Solids Calculations
g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results
Comment:
Sampling
Describe sampling:
Sampled for TC:LP, nutrients, metals, pathogen/vector analyses.
Is sampling adequate?
Is sampling representative?
Comment:
Transport
Is a copy of the permit in the transport vehicle?
Is a copy of the spill control plan in the vehicle?
Is the spill control plan satisfactory?
Does transport vehicle appear to be maintained?
Comment:
Land Application Site
Is a copy of the permit on -site during application events?
Is the application site in overall good condition?
Is the site free of runoff/ponding?
If present, is the application equipment in good operating condition?
Are buffers being maintained?
Are limiting slopes buffered?
10% for surface application
18% for subsurface application
Are there access restrictions and/or signs?
Is the application site free of odors or vectors?
Have performance requirements for application method been met?
For injection?
For incorporation?
Does permit require monitoring wells?
Have required MWs been installed?
Are MWs properly located w/ respect to RB and CB?
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: WQ0001800 Owner - Facility:Town of Yadkinville
Inspection Date: 11/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Are MWs properly constructed (including screened interval)?
Is the surrounding area served by public water?
If Annual Report indicates overapplication of PAN, are wells nearby that may be impacted?
Are soil types consistent w/ Soil Scientist report/evaluation?
Is the water table greater than 173' bls.
Is application occurring at the time of the inspection?
Comment: See comments
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5