20100603 Ver 1_Application_20100723

e\wd
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
July 15, 2010
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir,
q??? C I
'YJe:9ni'n
EUGENE A. CONTI,
SECRETARY
100003
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33, 23, Section 401 Water
Quality Certification, and Neuse Riparian Buffer Authorization for the
replacement of Bridge No. 19 over the Neuse River on SR 2000 (Falls of Neuse
Road), State Project No. 8.240997 1, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-2000(4),
Division 5, T.I.P No. B-4660.
Debit $240.00 from WBS No. 33822.1.1
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge No. 19
over the Neuse River on SR 2000 (Falls of Neuse Road).
Please see the enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Stormwater
Management Plan, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form, permit drawings, and design
plans for the above-referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) for this
was completed project in August 2008. Additional copies are available upon request.
There will be 0.03 acres of wetland impacts from permanent fill and mechanized clearing. Due
to the minimal amount of wetland impacts, the fact that the function of the wetland will not me
compromised and the wetland is scrub/shrub and not a mature forest, NCDOT proposes no
mitigation.
This project calls for a letting date of February 15, 2011 and a review date of January 4, 2011.
However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4701 Atlantic AVe.,
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT FAX: [phone] Suite 116
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Raleigh, NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598 WEBSITE: H .N000LORG

•A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at:
http://www.nedot.org/doh/preconstruct/pe/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Sara Easterly at [phone].
Smcerel
(ice Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
C? Environmental Management Director, PDEA

W/attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Mr. J. Wally Bowman, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, DEO
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Tracy Walter, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
B-4660 Permit Application
Page 2 of 2

O? FWAiFgOG
0Nii? ?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
I

Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
_® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ®No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ®No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacment of Bridge 19 over the Neus River on SR 2000 (Falls of Neuse Road)
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: B-4660
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): not applicable
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.9406 Longitude: - 78.5799
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Neuse River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Low density single family, cultivated land, and forest land
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.8
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
639
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing bridge No. 19 with a structure that is approximately 425-feet long. The new bridge will
include two 12-foot lanes, 4 foot shoulders and a 10-foot multi-use bike and pedestrian lane on the existing alignment
with an off-site detour. NCDOT will also be constricting a greenway path that will pass under the bridge. Two temporary
causeways will be used to construct the new bridge. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and
cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/

El Yes ® No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary E] Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit on October 31, 2006
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
Site l ®P ? T Pennament fill Riparian ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.01

Site 2 ®P ? T Mechanized
Clearing
Riparian ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ
0.02
Site 3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P El T ? Yes C1 Corps
? No ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.03 Permanent
0 Temporary
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ - non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1 ? P ® T Temporary
Causeway #1 Neuse River ® PER
? INT ® Corps
? DWQ 100 100
Site 2 ? P ® T Temporary
Causeway #2 Neuse River ® PER
? INT ® Corps
? DWQ 100 102
Site 3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
Site 6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Penn
202 Temp
3i. Comments: Total impact for Causeway #1 are 0.25 acres the total impact for Causeway #2 are 0.32 acres. Only one
causeway at at time will be installed.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If an impacts require mitig ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse
?Tar-Pamlico
? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary required?
B1 SP(-]T Bridge Impacts Neuse River ® Nos 1,019 386
B2 ®P ? T Road Crossing Neuse River ® Nos 420 0
B3 ®P ? T Greenway Neuse River ® Nos 5,679 4,761
6h. Total buffer impacts 7,118 5,147
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge will span the river; an off site detour will be used. Design Standards for Sensitive Waters will be
used
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2:1 slopes in jurisdictional and buffer areas, and Best Management Practices for Surface Waters, rip rap dissipater at pipe
outlets. Bridge end drains are located outside of buffer and wetlands. No deck drains are used on the roadway side of
the bridge. Also, a boardwalk spans the natural outlet ditch under MUP 2 rather than use of a pipe culvert.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g . Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h . Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a . If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved irt4ieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
Ia. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ? No
Comments: if yes, see attached permit drawings.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
(check all that apply): ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b . Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
Ia. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land? .
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ®No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from .
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
Raleigh
El
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP, USFWS website, and the NCDOT mussel survey conducted in 2006. No dwarf wedgemussel species were found.
The Biological Conclusion remains "No Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone. Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps

)
0 /0
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe. Ph D -
,
' D
t
Applicant/Agent
s Printed Name Appli ant/Ag nt's Signature a
e
(Agent's signature is valid only d an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Sara Easterly, NCDOT,
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
B-4660: Replace Bridge No. 19 over the Neuse River Creek on Falls of
the Neuse Road (SR 2000) Wake County. Field visit held 10/31/06.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.9406°
N, Long. -78.5799° W, Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 200 linear feet: 40 width (ft) and/or ac res.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.96 acres.
Cowardin Class: NCWAM Headwater Forest
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
? Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: NC DOT.
? Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app licant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
? U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 :New
Hill.
? USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Wake County
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (Nation al Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
? Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Wake sid 08, 2005.
or El Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Other information (please specify): NCDWQ Wetland Rating Sheet.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
Estimated
amount of Class of
Site Latitude Longitude Cowardin aquatic aquatic
number Class
resource in resource
review area
WA 35.9406° -78.5799° Headwater 0.0.3 wetland
Forest

4
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project: 33822.1.1
TIP: B-4660
County: Wake
Hydraulics Project Engineers: Brian Elam, E.I. (Sungate Design Group);
Bill Zerman, P.E. (NCDOT Hydraulics Unit)
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves the replacement of Bridge No. 19 on SR 2000 over Neuse River.
The overall length of the project with approach work is approximately 1,079 feet. The
proposed bridge will consist of 3@ 100', 1@ 80', 1@ 100' PSG (54"). The project
drainage consists of the bridge with deck drains on the multi-use path only and drainage
systems at the beginning and end of the bridge. There is one proposed standard rip rap
ditch and one existing ditch cleanout.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin. Buffer rules are in effect for this river
basin. The project will have one (1) crossing of a jurisdictional stream that will impact
the Neuse River. This section of The Neuse River is classified as WS-N and NSW. The
Neuse River is not listed on NCDENR-DWQ's 303d list. Wetlands will be impacted by
the proposed project.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters as a result of the location, construction and operation of the highway
system. BMPs are activities, practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce
stormwater pollution. Due to site restrictions no BMPs were used on this project.
At all the sites, stormwater will be treated and non-erosive velocities will be achieved
where practicable.
MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS
Several design elements. provided for minimization of wetland impacts. Bridge end drains
are located outside of buffers and wetlands. No deck drains are used on the roadway side
of the bridge. Also, a boardwalk spans the natural outlet ditch under -MUP2- rather than
use of a pipe culvert.
z a
® x

? ? e x W a
? F o w cc

? 0 U M z
U
C7
z ?
? ?
U
z z
0
w
w c?

c ?
a ?
ra ,
a
a
1 ? N
Z
W 0

0
0
0
0
0 @. zQYW
gR
J
O Q Z J } W
3
Q
m
W
® ® l.
M
Y?{y xl
oD Z
z
® U3po5
tt ® W K W S W
O
U '?. U ..
a
@ # W?WF-
?0
?

w
? w
?
? y
?
, y aa?
m0
W? w J H
Ll ~?wSS
W v' @ 3w Ox}DN50
0
o

z U w
@ U
@ aZ
WW
~
5.>-U m
0
.. F
U F
U U F
U E? U x0
v w u WW ?
U ] W ] r
? W 0:)W3WQW
6
dx
W
® Fy
[?
-'
®
?
r
Q
U ? ?
? ? W J
F FV,]
z jj?
Cr?T F p
p??11
F VI

z [
Ln 1p
I
rCl C_
¢
yjF Y. W
SF'ZQ
z
z
® -?
U i
w
®
® w ?Z ? ZOO
r
l ZU=Uwa
ni tV M @ u7 ?

O
?o
LL) Of

0 p H W \
LID Of N v
F
<> p =1
QwW
N
z3 m
z
r ? w
ra a ? Z .
zo
W? _
(if
} W

> Q

R
O
U J
NW
N>
Q
-
Of ?.

f O J

MOa
W J-
inaa
r:. 2 W M W
OU O O ~

IL V)
F% < H
O
U CD O
w
u U)
U} N
H Q
w W Z O
N O
J A q OW
O U
z cr U?
a ° in
H ?
Z W
CD O W
O N
•?
G m
\
?
A
?v-Lei ?
Q
LLJ

N

Q N
i ?:
H W O N
?i U
® N
Z
a Q
a (D
F-
0
H Z
O
W
a N
co
N _
® o
O O
n a
O a
O
r? ) U CC
T a Q
d
O Ln O CC

In N
Q
LLJ
N
U)

Q Q D U U
? N
LLJ a
c
N? cr
0 c
a 0 - C)

O
m U _
-
U) In
O
?
O N W
a Q 0 Lc,
M
O
CY)
T
O N
~
~
U
U
ii i CCQ
z
W N
WO + N
+
J O J U ? U 0 0
W w o w a E
W E
U Q U) N
O Z J W W
r O

O
d
L v
FD H W \
OWN v
E O W W
N
a 3 m
z
r w

F- ¢
0.
Z w
.-. Z O
W C::
-
x z
?
r Q O
U NWIJ
<
?
J p. O
gy
MOQ
WJ-
cn< W M
r?mW
4
I
O O Q
3 O `
ad U) F y UOO
W
Ur V) G
> wzo 0
Q
J w
A N
O W
U
U
0- U Ln
0- in Ln
H F
Z W
[O O W
S
O V

?\ LLJ
[O
\
o PAP
S? uj
' W
of
N

r S
fA? Q ~ N
l? SL
~ W °N
L'i
® ° V
7 U
W Q
Q
U O
W HF-
O
H Z
z
LL)
Q m
ui

N
z
_
?`o ® Z
O 20
M O
cr Cl
O
rr??
?J
Z U
a
O a
d
O N
M (if
U) co O Q
W V)
0
U)
a
Q a o m
o
Q Q F - U _

W

W IL
U
C

U
U)
W O C
=
-
Q W
O
- - F- O

p
cc U _

- to

v) N O

a o

0

lf) Y
UV) W Q
J In
J N m
Q
0 V)
~
U
II
>
> ZQ
J
Z
Q W N
+-
O N
}
W
w p W
J w U
o O 0
Q E 0
E
LL w Ui
d N
' Z
Q
O U)
O s J W W
Z 0

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMES
ADDRESSES
U.S. ARMY CORPS
OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 350
MONCURE, NC 27559
WETLAND,/ STREAM
IMPACTS

z o
O ?+
6
o ?
h ?

a
a
`
z
m
Sa z
F =
0o
O
Y
Z
O
? y 3 M

o m

0
U
z
F
m
y

IL m
m c m m

z

Z 3

L
C
E

U
Q
V
O
O
O
n

CL 3 LL
O

11

i
k N
r

l u
H
U
a
a

K
w
F a
a

W
W
Z

E

O

O

rJ Z
W W
Q
a
w ~
a
Q
T T T

U) Z
O S

L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
i
l
l
?-
j
2
--
E
? ?

Z y O
m d
C C U O_
?? a E r
N O ? O
N
LL WU Et-
N C
R C C ? C
y ? a ? x
E
w ? E a

Q N
m
N
r
E 3
u
N? m N

0 Cl

0
u
'>
0
K F

d
N
>
E ?
fA E
d _
? a
U
a
? m
m-d
F

W d my
d N? N U
? ` N
O N
O

Q L N d?
dU? O O

F ?
W o w

w
N
N U
?
F LL d
C N
d O
C C
C
A = t0 U
O
O
ELL ?1° 0 0

N
n
m
~ J J
N U U

E E
t? H
F
J J Of

OI
N J
^O N I? O
O ? N N O

N LL W W ?
v O} 4 N
Q
N (D
N +
m
N
-
-
-
-

u O
I
T
I
T J
F-

I 0
Q
Federal Aid # BRSTP-2000 (4) T!P N B-4660 County: Wake
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bri dge no. 19 over Neuse River on SR 2000, Wake County
On Feb. I1, 2008 representatives of
® North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
® North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
? Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
There are no effects on the National Regi?ter-listed property/properties located within
the project's area of potential edl'ect and listed on the reverse.
There are no effects on the National Regil? er-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
? There is an effect on the National Registe -listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect; The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
? There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect.. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
Representative, JDq ' Date

FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date

Representative, HPO Date

State Historic Preservation Officer Date
FederalAid# BRSTP-2000(4) TIP# B4660 County: Wake
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
r.lls of NauSC. Maxv6ccurtnq Cam,,. t 60
/Askew - i or v, 4u I-6v-S L t cu, V-V I A 1VV (T-A
COA C. LOhnw?vr.?fVy Revafed Waf etr S4a? c??e ?,?,_? 131 ?
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
'+Initialed: NCDOT HPO
FHWA
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
A.
B.
C.
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
Project Description:
B-4660
8.2409971
33822.1.1
BRSTP-2000(04)
The purpose of this project is to replace Wake County Bridge No. 19 on SR 2000 (Falls
of Neuse Road) over the Neuse River. The existing structure has a total length of
404.1-feet. The replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 450-feet long. The
bridge will include two 12-foot lanes, 4-foot shoulders and a 10-foot multi-use bike and
pedestrian lane separated from the travel lanes by vertical barrier. Total bridge width will
be 48.6-feet with a minimum of 34.8-feet clear deck width for travel lanes and 10-feet for
the bike and pedestrian lane. The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 425-feet from the southern end of the
bridge and tie directly into the existing spillway bridge No. 602 to the north. The
southern approach will include a 24-foot pavement width providing two 12-foot lanes.
Eight-foot shoulders with guardrail will be provided. The roadway will be designed as a
Rural Major Collector with a 45 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1).
Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance records indicate Bridge No. 19 has a sufficiency rating of
44.2 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally
obsolete due to deck geometry appraisal of 2' out of 9 according to the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) standards and therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program.
Bridge No. 19 was originally constructed in 1938 and rehabilitated in 1967. Substructure
elements range in age from 70 to 40 years in age. Steel superstructure elements are 40
years old. The typical life expectancy for structures of this type is 50 years. Bridge No.
19 has approached the end of its useful life.
Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type B improvements which apply to the project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement
(3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
I. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane).
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. .Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
I. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. . Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazards
and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit.
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
Qr. repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill).
nsportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of
rightof-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a
street with adequate capacity, to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle
traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required
and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger
shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when
located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is
adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
2
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UNIT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives, including
D.
shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may be required
in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed
until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
Special Project Information:
Estimated Costs:
The estimated costs, based on 2008 prices,. are as follows:
Structure $3,521,000
Roadway Approaches $ 450,000
On-Site Detour N/A
Structure Removal $ 170,000
Misc. & Mob. $ 540,000
En g. & Contingencies $ 788,000
Total Construction Cost $5,600,000
Right-of-Way Cost $ 117,500
Utility Relocation Cost $ 132,000
Total Project Costs $ 5,849,500
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 13300 vpd
Year 2030 - 15800 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 2%
Accidents: Traffic Engineering has evaluated a recent three year period and found 7
accidents occurring in the vicinity of the project. From the crash analysis, there does not
appear to be identifiable crash patterns or obvious safety hazards in the vicinity of the
structure.
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 19 is constructed of steel, concrete and stone masonry.
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be used to avoid
dropping debris into the river.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build - No build would result in eventually closing Falls of Neuse Road (SR
2000), which is unacceptable given the volume of traffic the facility carries.

Rehabilitation - The bridge was constructed in 1938 and rehabilitated in 1967
and has reached the end of its.life expectancy. Rehabilitation would require
replacing both substructure and superstructure components and would effectively
constitute replacing the bridge.
Offsite Detour - Bridge No. 19 will be replaced on the existing alignment.
Traffic will be detoured offsite (see Figure 1) during the construction period.
NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement
Projects considers multiple project variables beginning with the additional time
traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite detour. The offsite
detour for this project would include SR 2006 (Durant Road), US 1 (Capital
Blvd.) and NC 98 (Durham Road) and add approximately 3. 7 miles additional
travel.
Wake County Schools and Wake County Emergency Services has indicated that
they can manage the proposed detour. NCDOT Division 5 concurs with the use
of the detour.
Other Agency Comments:
The N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission provided standard comments, recommending
replacing this bridge with a bridge.
The N.C. Division of Water Quality recommends that the most protective sediment and
erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff into the Neuse
River. Additionally they request that road design plans provide treatment of the storm
water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent version of
NC DWQ Starmwater Best Management Practices.
Response: Neuse River Buffer Rules apply; therefore, sedimentation and erosion control
measures shall adhere to Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds.
The Historic Preservation Office (HPO) reviewed the project Historic Architectural
Resources Survey Report, prepared November 2007 and found that the project will have
no effects to listed or eligible National Register properties. (See concurrence dated
February 11, 2008.)
City of Raleigh is currently designing the Upper Neuse Greenway, which starts at Falls
Lake Dam and will connect to Forest Ridge Park to the north of Bridge No. 19 and under
Bridge No. 19 traveling south along the Neuse River. The project begins construction in
the fall of 2009. The City has requested that a multiuse path be accommodated on the
new bridge and to modify the existing bench on the south end of the bridge allow the
greenway to be constructed.
Response: NCDOT has developed the typical section for bridge to accommodate a 10-
foot multi-use path separated from the travel lanes by a vertical barrier. The City will be
required to contribute to the project for cost associated with the multi-use path on the
bridge. NCDOT proposes to delay construction of the greenway directly under Bridge
No. 19 and will construct that as a part of the new bridge.
Public Involvement:
E.
A Citizen's Informational Workshop was held on August 13, 2007, which was attended
by 175 citizens. The majority of the comments concerned the detour route, which was
considered to be too long. There was large support for coordinating the project with the
City of Raleigh's New Falls of Neuse project and using that project, which includes a
bridge over the Neuse River as the detour route.
Response: NCDOT will coordinate with the City of Raleigh concerning the possibility
to utilize the New Falls of Neuse Road as the detour for this bridge replacement project
Threshold Criteria The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for
Type H actions:
Ecological Yes No
1 Will the project have a substantial impact on any unique or ? v
important natural resource? J?
2 Does the project involve habitat where federally listed ?
endangered or threatened species may occur?
3 Will the project affect anadromous fish? ? J?"
4 If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of permanent
and/or temporary wetland taking less than one-tenth (1/10) ?
of an acre and have all practicable measures to avoid and x
minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
5 Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service
lands?
?
X .
6 Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction acti
iti
? ?
v
es
7 Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters
(H
W
? ? v
Q
) X
8 Will the project require fill in waters of the United States in
any of the designated mountain tro
t
i ?
u
count
es?
9 Does the project involve any known underground storage ,
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sit
? ?
es

Permits and Coordination Yes No
10 If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any "Area X
of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?

11 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
? ?
X
resources
12 Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ?
13 Will the project result in the modification of any existing
l
?
fl
d ?
regu
atory
way
oo
14 Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
h
? ?
c
anges
Social, Economic and Cultural Resources Yes No
15 Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
h
l
d
f
h
? F] Xv
growt
or
an
use
or t
e area
16 Will the project require the relocation of any family or
b
i
? F] Xv
us
ness
17 Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
F1
X
low-income population?
18 If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
h
f
i
i
i
id
d
i
? X ?
t o
way acqu
s
t
on cons
ere
m
nor
amount of rig
19 Will the project involve any changes in access control? ? X
20 Will the project substantially alter the usefulness and/or land ? X
use of adjacent property?
21 Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent local ? X
traffic patterns or community cohesiveness?
22 Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan F]
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X
_
23 Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic ? X
volumes?
6
,
24 Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing ?
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours?
25 If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
.be replaced at its existing location (along the existing
facility) and will all construction proposed in association
with the bridge replacement project be contained on the X
existing facility?
26 Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or F] X
environmental grounds concerning the project?
27 Is the project consistent with all Federal, State and local El
laws relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
28 Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties ?
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic X
Places?
29 Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ? X
important to history or pre-history?
30 Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl
refuges, historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in ?
Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act X
of 1966)?
31 Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as
defined by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation ?
X
Act of 1965, as amended?
32 Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for ?
X
inclusion in the Natural System of Wild and Scenic Rivers?
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
There are no unfavorable responses in Part E.

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4660
State Project No. 8.2409971
Federal Project No. 338211.
Project Description: (Include project scope and location. Attach location map.)
The purpose of this project is to replace Wake County Bridge No. 19 on SR 2000 (Falls
of Neuse Road) over the Neuse River. The existing structure has a total length of
404.1-feet. The replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 450-feet long. The
bridge will include two 12-foot lanes, 4-foot shoulders and a 10-foot multi-use bike and
pedestrian lane separated from the travel lanes by vertical barrier. Total bridge width will
be 48.6-feet with a minimum of 36-feet clear deck width for travel lanes and 10-feet for
the bike and pedestrian lane. The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existing structure.
The approach roadway will extend approximately.425-feet from the southern end of the
bridge and tie directly into the existing spillway bridge No. 602 to the north. The
southern approach will include a 24-foot pavement width providing two 12-foot lanes.
Eight-foot shoulders with guardrail will be provided. The roadway will be designed.as a
Rural Major Collector with a 45 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure t).
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
? TYPE II(A)
-TYPE H(B)
Approved:
440
Date
Bridge Project Development Engineer -
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
,ohs z?'. ??. /4!? e--
Date Project Engineer
Project Development & EVironmental Analysis Branch
k1410, / .
Date Projec fanning Engineer
Project Development & Ei
8/28/2008
Analysis Branch.
Date Iona C. Hauser, AICP
Senior Planner, Stewart Engineering, Inc.
For type II(B) proiects only:
N/A
N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
w
PROJECT COMMTTMENTS:
Wake County
Bridge No. 19 on SR 2000
over Neuse River
Federal Project No. BRSTP-2000(04)
State Project No. 8.2409971
W.B.S. No. 33822.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4660
All Design Groups & Division Construction - Greenway Accommodation
The new bridge will to be designed to include a 10-foot multi-use path separated from the travel
lanes by a vertical barrier. The City of Raleigh will be required to contribute to the project for
costs associated with the multi-use path on the bridge. NCDOT proposes to delay construction of
the greenway under Bridge No. 19 and will construct that as a part of the new bridge.
Division 5 Construction, Resident Engineer's Office - Offsite Detour
The Wake County Emergency Services and Public Schools should be notified at least two month
prior to road closure.
Roadside Environmental Unit, Division 5 - Water Quality
Sedimentation and erosion control measures shall adhere to Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds.
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
Green Sheet
August 2008
Page 1 of 1
. , _..,
Q? D.d oasBe&e

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTME14TOF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIS BRANCH
WARE COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 19 ON SR 2000
OVERNEUSERIVER
B4660
Figm 1
s ss$$$SYS TIME$$$$$
S$$$USasERNA.ME$sMESSssocNSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSs
SSSSUSSS _
CONTRACT: TIP PROJECT:
0 0 0
G1
T ? O N U

T p m p p

o z
Z
m N
° 0

? D k7

0 pp pp

I y O
?
5n O
N A
c N G ti O G W
O O (n
'. A II II II II II II II (?
)OC 0
Or?
m y
3 Dy V
r
Z
ry o CN
= r~ a
a
tip 0
^ O
p
N?
z e
0 r r
0 m m
D Gl G1
r = _
m
Z N A
ti
i c v
y F
H
ti
O T V
t
A
_O y
`m ^
P y qm l
o IA P y
P P
O O
II II li
O O O
N ?
O I,G W
a
3 I3. 3
T
m T n 9
/1
C: D T'T ?n
< p -i
K 47
N a U .? \ i2?'
D
Y
J? N
O a
C f
A I

O 1
I

?
a
(]
a
? Z ? z
a; C Y 2 o m ?o E
o ? p D m ?

z c
o
2 >
< i >
?

Y
O m 5
T -
Q z
Y C
n z 8 $

m
A A m
m
C
rt
3
V
v_
D
a
r
V
3
G
6
3
m
Ci
G
REVISIONS
O \ \?w
49
s; 8 a.
r?
m
I
? Opp ?
? n?n Gy".N
z
Lp? ^o=
E>° .erg
o?
41 1
- o
"s aa•er v u
Q 4e ? ? x
Q a i I .a. x-x?
o ? ? I 4cas O
pJ _ V O {lqn I T= 6
? ? j1'llb i &'?x Q I
Rio\d?`? ?% fj
o\ r? s 1
0
\D a °? I W m - %?X W
?• t7rz;
o° r r
'o I
b3Alb 3??'
o goo"omoo
o? smp=y.g? O
> on ? ?a?°-s?? ° L
O • . 5 _ z
? ?
^ m<?coSDO zz
O

C7
a
pUE I
,s r ? d
Zii
V
k Vb O
MM(.-?
O T yJy
G

.d
Z

?-
i o oI n

s
? 8s4

?
??yy
5?/?/
I
111
_a

d 1 "`
\\?/\J
V A A
o ?ZC002?[
Om HEIP5
3g???g
0 4
o m
w z

Z > - u
U 47 (Z3
?o "t a?

N
IW
8
N
W
0
A\
m 10
0
0
0
10

Qg@
°
°
°
° z /
gg
m
m
m
A
mmm I„?,v?p 9° M w

AAAc-c??j ?j2 .
ooo??xxx?o p nlm-?? ? ? n

2 2
- Z O_ <
E Z 1
nn
2
0
?c?c?n?
A Cm m
O
???
N+v
O 4
,,

N

/
T
^O
Tm xIT2nm `L"? c O
A
Z _ o
??
m n
y
2 a it
o? 2 0 ? D -
xm?2 c
II II 11 II II II II II 11 ? ? 6+ /
?•? m
? s?$ Z
m n
N
N°N
u° tn
?? I o
? 0
°
'2p
°g
N N o
+ ?
.o yC 0
D
*N N
o.n V +Nm y .i
N Na
' C
Tn<mn c»
A
?
~
?
ra
ra
a
? ooo
° y i
il
il In
il t
t
t
il
t p .(,i
=1 /
STA22 -L- LT • • l
EL2N /
I N
N
$ A22+35 K- LT
;V
01 ELZS \\,
x<mm
/ Il Ilan
M3 aNN
I p Qoo
N ?

1 W
?
?
1

m
K ? ?
i
I. ? p
o s ? ?
? ? w 3? j
I ' ?tFi ?? ? na I o? ? ?
( II ° P + =o
II
?I II
N- In
?" N
Ja
Q O G i
U
O F
Q$ C
Z
0 a I li
I " I I
_
+ n

u? N '
^
____
II IIUI 1 s > x II
aNN 1 K

r- i N Z

? C
U _I I

I
NyVI N I
" N Y p T <Q __ ----- ___ --
u =
'a .. rp
U ' •O

y -I
I ypQ
N
V

---- - - ------- -
I I
--

co
--
_______ I ! im
?
J
I I #O I Z
n ii ?c? m I o
>
N N
? I

I y
m Y p
O
? I
N
N o ?°
m + n
N
10 yv f.5'NJ ?I O ?
A lz
T 9mi° ? C1!-? 81

? III
S sSSYSTIMESSESS I
s E ESSESSSESS ESt?
tsi Ell SEFNfaMEESSS [.Nt{
i titif tf i6fiti5
?

I
I
I I
I
I I
I
i
I I

I
I

I I
I
I
I
N I
I I
I
I I
I
I

, I
I
I

I I
I
I

I I
I

I
I

I
II
I
1
II
I
I
I
I ?

I
I I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N I
I
I \
I \ N
I \ ? I
N \ N I
I
I
\ ?

I
I
I
\
I ? I
I
1
I I
\ I
I ? ? O O
?
O ?
N
, N N
? I I
I
I
I
I ?
I I 00

I
I
O I
I
O I
I
I O I p ?
'I p
+ t
O N i
1 c
O I O 0 0 l
I
II I
O p I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
i I
I
j
I I
I,
y

I
I N

I I
I
I J
I
/
I A I
I N I

I
1
i I
/ I
I
I

/ I

/
o I

SSSSSSSYSTIMESSSSS
sssss SSSSSSSSSSSDGNSSSSSSSSSSEE$$$$
SSSSUSERNAN.ESSSS
CONTRACT: TIP PROJECT:
0 0 0
'O VI O U UNi

T o m o o
m = v

A
O Z
?
VJ
n 0 0 0 0 a
D th=f
L ?
o °o °o

r+ D
D p
n ?
s = o° cm
c
c rn < ? O < O O ('
a II II II 'III II II II ?
)OC z
OF'b ; a=1 ° g $ b
Zmr .a Cy? l a
>y x >? y
'a
MMO
m O
M II II
N
A e a°
0 r r
O m
D O G1
r y y
r x x
m
U 0
D
x ? o
c F
a < bb
v m y
O ?v v
a C)
'p O H
P G
o I ? ? yn
U P V
P P
O O
II II it
O O O
N L
A ISO W
3. !I. 3,
T T G
m n
C e
M
I
O

>
O N
D
i n i3'
'i

?n i
N `C
T a
3
? 7ixx
p m O y ? ? i

O

s

a

?
?
Y o
z
O y

R
D ?
? z
O S Z
x o

m
z a
G
m 9
T
Z s
::E

J
A
0 x

b a

?_
S's n
?o '
8? ?
p z
m ?"
A I m
m ' ?
m -?
m I
RtY?5?ON5
48899 Y TIM ESS44
54954 t° 99 fE4EMGN449f 89999tt9ff4f ?p
tl M tUI
I I 0 a
-? : 8qz u..
1 \ „ I 2.oS Q
F c M Soz
Pi 0
. ) f x
-x
-- \ r=O6°p° 81 a 1X °? ° f
j
d6_1 fi
AU" ury A 9 © ?'??>>55t 1 j4 E
anR? i• oo O 4 ?1 1 a ? /?
20
n.
IT!
GJ
O 1 °
90
I N \
a? lrnl^' ? II ...? ? O N a
<3 0
° ? ? ? I a m
as f1
08
lea _ ? V
Y4? .1? ? I o ? ? -
C:??a 6 . I T U
O

Z?l
•Q
0?
M
a
N
0
®.I
II
f660_RDY_PLIANSNEETS.dgn
-\roj\89n
USEReer
11CONTRACT.- TIP PROJECT

O U
O I U
O

?
9
0
O U U ryy O
T`
Y
o m I
o 0
m Z
o
z
A 30
0
0
c
w
o
cm
Nz

z m--I
y
0A
N
mO
O p
? N
i°, °
b
mrn
< o < o o H {2
n II n n n u n ?j 3?
() Jo
O C A w a
"'
° ?
°
m cn x -m-1 r
S ao
?v
m
D o
N a
2
O O a Om
..
r C
_ --I y
? m
O? II II ' =T
zo N_ O
A e
m
0 r r
m m
D G1 G1
r = 2
m
Z w 0
y n OQ
c G
m
A H ? Q
m A (?
Ism ? O F`y
IA ti y Lz]
P I %'
P p
P P
O °
it II II
° O O
IJ O _
A ? W
G
m m L
m h m Z
m R1 ?
c c
D y C
? G7
u, y
J K ?
S m I2=??E
y ??3i'?

O °a Z O

ppp
4 1 Y m ? >

A m

7 n
m
m
°x
Z
n
O
O
O
ti
n
-1
O`C
G
<D
OO
m
N_ ?p
O
Z m
z
O
z
m
m
A_
Z
C)
n
O
O
0
z

II
s
0 o n n n
N A W N
mo m
9 y
ym 49 9
<a <9 4 •
v
m 0 y
v
>ymv 9Z9 i
r = t

mn
m mD0 >O
2m
v x t
m9 m. mK mK
9y i
• li>S >m D? )
)> >S
m
m S
z>
m m> > >
v >
>= »
m
o
T O
T o>
m> m > > )
?
O
>O

to ay

So
O;
?
m O>
>No O

Sa m>
m
>

m<
I
. m
1II
o
I
.
I

E I c ? ? m

ya
m m I o
y D = y
S
Z9

? D a
m i n im

9
n o

m
m =

m
y )
v
> T
)
m ? ;
m

n

~
m

m
m ?m

o >
y
F
f

~ I m
t
m
° p .
p
m Z i
p n
$ p
_ y .
r m r
I
L
mm
m
z
-1
W
O
m
l_
m
O
Z
0
OE
?F
0
m
0
N
,0
O G1
z
0
T
y
a
>p
L
N m ?
p O <
m Z
p n -p.
Pg?S
im cm
__. rEZ)
r
D m
N p
O o
b
a f
O D
O
y r
D (m?
N i.
O
u Z
0
0
00
on
z q
o
7
O
D D v
N N
V N
+ ? D
O O m
o
Z o o
ms ? n
p N
N S cn
> r m
o-r a n
N
O
1 ? 0
j'm Z Z
m
N G1 _.
} Z Z
`? m Q
O p
o N
O
i
N
r
IZ\\\
O
Jv
J1J
1
D
f
D
D
I
0
H
0
_H
N
r
Z
m
N
0
n
Q
0
c
°
O N
m ?
O
U m ? H

n A I° N A
to ° U C
1 D
Iy
u t^ D
ti
y C
D m
+ D
y O
? K
O ?
<s
ti
I r
N N
u O
+ Z
Y
P
O
O
2
N
0
F?
F
Y I /v
D w D
° y o` y
Z P m
v y .O - (l
A A JJ

O D

m N
m

O
t
Z

O
Z o
A
A ?\
51 I // ?a
m ' V
I
I

O
Q Q
a
i °
N £ Z
Z ? n °
P
m p O
I c c
o i
Q
I
N ? I W
m c o
N S
m M
^„? N m
N T m p
m N O
+ o D
A F r
0 c s 7C
N O JC
0 O ?
A ? r D
? c
4 S n
s

O
v
n
O
N

^? Q
O
C
Z
a
O
?

o
#i c
c c y

P T ? t
?
C
+ +
c
r

O O
yl o N I ?
o O C
? ?
N
? C m
z O ?

?
O
y y
t
s s
r ? ?
a
N ? "O 'c
o+ ? n
D

I
Y
O
O
Z
m

I?
I
? c
i T m
+ g
I p
i o f
I O D
O ?
5 s
I ? N
N
+ Z
O
O
N
m
n
0
Z
Z
O
/W
1
O
0
C
Z
m
c
REVISIONS
"&46 DATE:- - PARCEL 5; REVISED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION E SEMENT DUE TO CHANGE IN TRAIL ALIGNMENT.
6/R ?
...?d 6D.HUY_PLPN6HEET6.dgn
_ ?.. 1p ? _ LB s
of w ? ` - 'e-I
----=-? 0
?l all
N .? ]pl
4 \\ ?\\ ?>,,.? N ?--_..I E i carer si gvlGyT?{?^]rb
•?^? ? \??\ ? ? ?.95'fi2 •vYitl 01 •?d?tl P`\ «b2.CS0 y? ? m
Ln O Y^ Y ei3.B0• N•I '99
n? 1 \ \ - " 221IIB 5 V ? X,
I \ {q t 5Y ? ` C BB S <13
RtL[°Cy Its aB m6c
C\ i R ? I ?I 3v ? /
'?- ? .Rrza I -n?,
10
Pff/sni 10+=
o /
tRt?` ao\r ? 41a \ .m °$ e? I II ??",I?"R a
$ T a i 5 n ''? Q ?9
1 y X
90T9 -K ? XJ /?`•?
3,11.61 ? /??7yI
S R .6 1' S gli o o R, l ? ?g
o. ?g? nF cap.yN Ry 0. 1 - oZ e.w Qx .os'zz
feosl,
saes 'N _
08 °lu 0l .LO'sn '$a b? Pa.seof. yr t?Id X
01
'.? ° ?`??G mud a 'Imp LJ TP° 1\R °Y, ..a n>
v t ? ? ? ? J _ i4 z
y I\
l? w
mm a °?o w?$
?ti?F4 0 ?;L6 ??R_ ? 60
R R R R ? Zf : e• R
I N 'Fg 4 SDBI I1
v ry
av?oD, ?{? cgs R
RRRR.R ? ? ?°?'
eQq .,/' P
a IN V
? ? ? ? ?^ ? aanra nnav $II 1
Rn 1p?o a o
AIL !F
ee o II i ?
?ti; OD C e? e ~yf 0 III
1 R R R $ ? t g?
R$;?c ?61_? it s
I r i? e°g? I -
tiH L 0. ??? 2?? . II
q rig
A `I
4?`UIE]ry4? T .I 5E I n _?--sr?'z? [?A? :... _ •.
. $RT
I'a. 4s5 ?
sA 572a'+`'44I to
8 mfg-(D
kz .lREg4
s s INV
I E
? n
° m?
D
$ a Z
m
0
US`-- n
? PUE
PUE B
i+ J/ +
e
URs
z ?Po\
to
I=
IN
I?
IA
i,

\ do
? woods Iloo
3s?? 11 /
41
f \ GA E
I ?
X \ 36' C \
- i- -
S^Eo n 1IT
1 i n ";z ?•
o MH r'Fl- m
io ? e$T ,`„ o n tP
m / ? °o I
N 11°59'41
Ilz\.»?' 11
--X, / I y
D RAIL- ? B5T \
S l s Bus Stapr42
\ 1 ,
O,R N I
O,R f-I 1 ,
C St 1+0
BST EP
I
C --- m
m BST
G Il ?/ ECC
ED
OR It1J 96,1?
2
Q,c 3+96
+'°
35
\ \ ? yy
c? I wo
1 '
/\\
, I
_//' J
U
• It

O
o Ir.

N
O

N
N
N
W
N
A
N
N
N
P
N
V
N
OD
N
1O
0
r

I
u
.,? -
.o
w, ? 1

0
0
O
"0
F
0
? B3;iU 7fi3N
00 1 )

77
l aro /
-x-k-x?
!J O
` I
,x {
S li
I I
- I I ??*II
I I I ? _ _---x 4
- I `
5R / `
?I ? L_y? I I
I I
J / f J
ss?-- I A
i / rri
F `
t I? Ga f }
I

ali mz\\ .
°17
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMES
ADDRESSES
U.S. ARMY CORPS
OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 350
MONCURE, NC 27559
BUFFER
IMPACTS

Z

p
? Q
tix
QZ =
K LL
r 0
LL Z
??

w?
p p
ti
z

^
m
Z?
O N
U N
w ^
Y N
3v

w
O
a

I
o?
N
N
N
N H
w
x
N O
N
N

m
}

Q

N
F-
U
a '

W
LL
LL
M

N °
z Z w
co U) O Z
O

Z W
z g? °

m w
J zr °
o
W

$ O J
o

F O o

y LL N
i
N

Z a

?, o

°
N

LLI

Z
W
O
ay e ¢

" ax

Z
s y 0 z o ,

0
QQ
?
K
0

l
m N
LL
r0
n N -
W
LL Z Y n H
00

W 1 W N
00 O
K
U a. ,
Z

N

CL o x

LL °y

F- N
Z wN
y
W ? ?
W

m
d w -,

J
F-
O
F-
W
J
m N

Z C
F- 0-

W r

O
N
J
h

N O

O N

N
O Y y O O N
J F
? H
U m N

C d
0 p ?-
N n a ?n
L ?
_
J
a w
ry m_ ° m
r m
O ? N vei n
, N
v, J
r W H
U Ja
4a
d a
?
a
w W

W m
W p

? pQ m x x
,o
m
U
J
Z O °o °m
O C 1
m }
f. ? N
Q O O
O
F
N W N n
} 1
N O
W
p
W
>a ?
F m v
W °° m
N v ry
_
m ? c
W
m ?
o w
z y
v
O
H m F C7
U ?
K o
f- o
N
M
O J
z
N
N Q
W F
h
?m O
3v w