20190183 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2020_Draft_20201120

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190183 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/20/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/20/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Jeffrey Turner [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20190183 Version:*1
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C•' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank
Parcel
County: Randolph
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Plans
File Upload: LoflinPhIl_BufferBank MY1_2020_Draft.pdf 14.04MB
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeffrey S Turner
Signature:* f
J Am/4

S MONITORING YEAR 1 LOFLIN DAIRY PHASE II BUFFER MITIGATION
BANK PARCEL
ANNUAL REPORT Wildlands Holdings V, LLC's Randleman Lake Umbrella
Mitigation Bank
Randolph County, NC
Draft DWR ID#2019-0183
Randleman Lake Watershed
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003
Data Collection Period: September 2020
Submission Date: November 18, 2020
PREPARED FOR:
WILDLANDS HOLDINGS V, LLC
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
[phone]

PREPARED BY:
Oir
%iv
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page ii

LOFLIN DAIRY PHASE II BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: INTRODUCTION 2
1.1 Project Description 2
1.2 Bank Sponsor & Financial Assurance 2
1.3 Project History 3
1.4 Project Location 3
1.5 Project Design 3
1.6 Project Objectives 4
Section 2: VEGETATION MONITORING 5
2.1 Success Criteria 5
2.2 Monitoring Protocols 5
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring 6
2.4 Conclusions 7
Section 3: REFERENCES 8
APPENDICES
Appendix A: General Tables and Figures
Table la-b Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes
Table 5 Monitoring Components Summary
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Figure 1 Project Location Map
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Figure 3 Project Components/Assets Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map
Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledgers
Appendix C:Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Count
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Vegetation Plot Field Data Sheets
Appendix D: Overview Photographs
Appendix E: Problem Area Photographs
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 1

Section 1: INTRODUCTION
The Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is under the terms and conditions of the
Randleman Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument(UMBI), which was made and entered into by
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC, the acting Bank Sponsor(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR).The UMBI and Bank Parcel
Development Plan (BPDP)were approved on April 10, 2019.The Parcel was planned and designed
according to the UMBI and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295, which became
effective on November 1, 2015.
The project includes the restoration of riparian areas along Bob Branch and several unnamed tributaries
(Al, B1, B2, and B3) in Randolph County, NC(Figure 1). The primary purpose of the Bank is to provide
riparian buffer mitigation credits to mitigate for unavoidable buffer impacts in the Randleman Lake
Watershed, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030003 and the DWR Sub-basin 03-06-08 of the Cape Fear
River Basin.
1.1 Project Description
This Parcel provides buffer mitigation through the creation of a riparian buffer mitigation bank.The
project involved the restoration of onsite riparian buffers that help reduce non-point source
contaminant discharges from agricultural run-off to downstream waters.The project streams flow into
the Randleman Reservoir,which drains into the Deep River, and is part of the Cape Fear River Basin.
There is an existing conservation easement on the first 50 feet from the top of bank of several of the
Parcel's project streams:Al, B1, B2, and B3 (Figurel).This existing easement(Phase I)was recorded on
the Parcel in 2012 as part of a NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Loflin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
(DWR#2012-0365). Phase II of the project expanded the existing buffer restoration area an additional
50 feet on either side of Al, B1, B2, and B3 and adds a new 100-foot buffer on either side of Bob Branch,
for a total of 12.00 acres.
Of the 12.00 acres protected under the Phase II conservation easement, 8.24 acres are for riparian
buffer restoration, 0.16 acres for riparian buffer enhancement, and 2.84 acres for riparian buffer
preservation, for a total of 366,883.664 square feet of riparian buffer credits. An additional 0.11 acres of
forested riparian buffer are protected under the conservation easement but are not eligible for
mitigation credit in compliance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5).
See Tables 1 through 4 in Appendix A for detailed information regarding the project assets, activity,
background, and attributes.
1.2 Bank Sponsor & Financial Assurance
The Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Parcel is part of the Bank.The Randleman UMBI for the Bank
was approved on April 10, 2019.
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Attn:Shawn Wilkerson
Email:[e-mail]
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 2

1.3 Project History
The Randleman UMBI and the Bank Parcel Development Packages (BPDP)were signed and approved on
April 10, 2019. Project planting was completed in January 2020.The baseline monitoring collection was
completed in February of 2020, and the report delivered in April of 2020. The Year 1 project monitoring
collection was completed in September 2020. Additional project history information is provided in Table
2 of Appendix 1.
1.4 Project Location
The Parcel is located in Randolph County, NC (Figure 1).The site is located within the 14-digit HUC
03030003010060 and the DWR Sub-basin 03-06-08,which is in the Randleman Lake Watershed of the
Cape Fear River Basin (Figure 2).
The Loflin Dairy Parcel is located off Loflin Dairy Road, which is approximately six miles southeast of the
intersection of Interstate 85 and Highway 311 in Archdale.To access the site from Greensboro, take 1-85
S.Take exit 113C-A for 1-74. In 0.7 miles,take exit 113B onto 1-74 E towards Asheboro. In 4.2 miles, take
exit 79 for Cedar Square Road. In 0.3 miles, turn right onto Cedar Square Road. Continue for 0.3 miles
and turn left onto US-311. Continue for 2.4 miles and turn left onto Loflin Dairy Road.The Parcel is
located at the end of the road on the left (35°50'45.2" N, 79°52'20.4"W).
The Parcel is surrounded by fields that have been alternately used for cattle and crop production.There
is a 60-foot easement break on B1 and both a 70-foot and 15-foot easement break on Bob Branch. There
is also a 30-foot access easement break along Al that was recorded as part of Phase ! of the project.The
break in the existing Phase ! conservation easement will remain to allow for access to both the phases of
the project.
1.5 Project Design
Mitigation credits for the site are based upon the as-built survey. A map detailing the credit generation
is provided in Figure 3.The tables and figures are all presented in Appendix A.
Mitigation activities per drainage feature are outlined in Table la.These acreages were calculated prior
to applying any reductions in riparian buffer credits for areas between 101 feet and 200 feet from top of
bank, per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n) or the 2:1 and 10:1 credit ratios on the enhancement and preservation
of rural streams respectively, per 15A NCAC 02B.295(m).
After applying the applicable reductions in credits and credit ratios, the Loflin Dairy Phase II Bank Parcel
includes 8.422 credited acres, or 366,883.664 ft2 of riparian buffer credits, as shown in Table lb.The
Sponsor will maintain two credit ledgers.
Planting of bare root trees occurred in the restoration areas of the site, and supplemental plantings
occurred in the enhancement areas of the site.Tree species selected for the Parcel were native
hardwood species typical for Piedmont communities as defined by Schafale (2012). 5,010 trees were
planted at a density of 597 trees per acre, which is sufficient to meet the performance standards of 260
trees per acre at the end of five years (Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295). For most of the site, it was
determined that seed mix was not needed based on lack of disturbed areas. No work was performed in
the preservation portions of the site, and these areas are protected in perpetuity under the
conservation easement.
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 3

1.6 Project Objectives
The major goals of the proposed buffer restoration project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Deep River and Randleman Reservoir watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin by
creating a functional riparian corridor and restoring and enhancing the riparian buffer.The proposed
project supports specific goals identified in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan
(RBRP)for the Cape Fear River Catalog Unit(CU) 03030003. Specific enhancements to water quality and
ecological processes are outlined in the table below:
Goals Objectives
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the
agricultural fields through restored native buffer zones.The
Decrease nutrient levels off-site nutrient input will also be absorbed on-site by
dispersing flood flows through native vegetation,thereby
reducing nutrient inputs to waters of the Randleman
Reservoir
Sediment from off-site sources will be deposited on
restored floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow
Decrease sediment input overland flow velocities,thereby reducing sediment inputs
to waters of Randleman Reservoir.
Buffer areas will be restored by removing invasive
Create appropriate terrestrial habitat vegetation and planting native vegetation;thereby
improving wildlife habitat and restoring degraded riparian
buffers.
A conservation easement will be established on the Parcel
Permanently protect the Site from harmful uses. that will protect aquatic habitat and water supply waters in
perpetuity.
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 4

Section 2: VEGETATION MONITORING
The performance criteria for the Parcel follows approved performance criteria presented in the
guidance documents outlined in the Consolidated Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295). Annual monitoring
and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished project (Table 5).
2.1 Success Criteria
The buffer restoration project has been assigned specific performance criteria components for
vegetation. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the five-year post -construction
monitoring. An outline of the performance criteria and monitoring components are shown in Table 5
and are depicted in Figure 4 (Appendix A). The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the
survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50% of the
established stems, and an established density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year
Five. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance
standards with DWR approval.
2.2 Monitoring Protocols
Vegetation
Six, 10-meter by 10-meter vegetation monitoring plots were installed within the buffer restoration area
to measure the survival of the planted trees (Figure 4). The number of plots required was determined in
accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling Protocol (CVS) Levels 1 & 2 (Lee et al. 2008).
Vegetation assessments were conducted following the CVS Levels 1 & 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 (Lee et al. 2008; Peet et al. 1996).
Planting was completed on February 18, 2020 and annual monitoring activities began in the fall of 2020,
at least five months after planting was completed, and will continue in the fall for the remainder of the
monitoring period (Table 2). Each year a reference photo will be taken from the origin pole, which is
located near the southwestern corner of each vegetation plot, and all planted stems will be marked with
flagging tape and their heights recorded. Species composition, height, density, and survival rates will be
evaluated on an annual basis by plot for the entire site. The total number of volunteer woody stems will
also be documented and reported.
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs will be taken of the project area using a drone once a year to visually document site
stability for five years following construction.
The approximate locations of the aerial photos are shown in Figure 4. The photos documenting the
current site conditions of the Parcel are provided in Appendix D.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above. Visual assessments will be performed within the site on a semi-annual basis during the five-year
monitoring period. Problem areas with vegetative health will be noted (e.g. low stem density, vegetation
mortality, invasive species or encroachment). Areas of concern will be mapped, photographed, and
accompanied by a written description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during
each subsequent visual assessment. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and
treated as necessary throughout the required, five-year monitoring period. Photos showing identified
problem areas are provided in Appendix E.
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report —Draft Page 5

Adaptive Management Criteria
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
2.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to,fire, flooding, drought,
or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed with the consent
of DWR to achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria.
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
2.3.1 Vegetative Success
The six vegetation plots were sampled in September 2020 towards the end of the first growing season.A
reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot, which can be found in Appendix C
along with the stem count raw data.Total numbers of tree species identified within the monitoring plots
as well as density and composition are summarized in Table 9.The field data sheets are also in Appendix
C.
Several stems within the plots were mis-identified as swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) during
baseline monitoring based on the planting list provided by the contractor. During MY1 monitoring and
after leaf-out,these stems were reexamined and correctly identified as red oak(Quercus rubra).
Though red oak was not included on the planting list provided by the contractor, it appears to have been
a mistake since the stems were part of the original planted stems and are evidently red oak.Therefore,
the vegetation plot composition table was updated in MY1 to include the accurate label of Q. rubra for
the associated planted stems.
The 2020 vegetation monitoring period found an average stem density of 627 stems per acre with the
stem densities of the individual plots ranging from 526-890 stems per acre. These densities are all
greater than the final requirement of 260 stems per acre and decreased slightly from the as-built
condition in February of 2020 when an average of 688 stems per acre were counted; the resulting
average survival rate of the site is 91%.The plots are composed of six different species with plots 1, 2,
and 6 having five species and plots 3-5 having six(one additional volunteer species was also found in
plot 6 but is not included in the site total). The average stem height in MY1 is 85 cm,which is an
increase in 4 cm since planting.The Parcel is on track to meet its final success criteria.
2.3.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
An assessment of the vegetation condition was conducted throughout the site. There were no bare
areas noted and a total of less than one acre of areas of concern. These areas are outlined below,
presented in Table 6, and depicted in Figure 4 of Appendix A.
Encroachment
Two areas of easement encroachment, totaling 0.02 acres, were identified where the property owner
extended his row crop planting into the easement.The landowner was notified in October 2020 of this
issue and he agreed to stay out of the easement; additional signage or fencing may be installed during
the 2020-2021 winter as needed to further correct this issue.
Invasive Species
Six areas of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) totaling 0.3 acres were identified within the easement:
two areas along the right bank of Bob Branch, two areas along the left bank of Reach B3, one area along
the right bank of Reach B2, and one area near the Reach B1 and B2 confluence. Some areas were hand-
cleared in July to reduce the growth of the S. halepense. Spot herbicide treatments may be applied
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 6

around the base of the trees in the spring and as needed to reduce the competition from S. halepense
and allow the trees to grow up and shade out the grass. Invasive species populations will continue to be
monitored and spot herbicide treatments will be conducted as needed during the appropriate time of
year.
Bare Areas
Three areas of low stem-density, totaling 0.5 acres,were identified within the easement: one area along
the left bank of Bob Branch, and two areas along the right bank of Bob Branch. It is likely that this area's
density will increase throughout the monitoring period by way of resprouts and the continued
introduction of volunteer species; therefore, no additional planting is needed at this time. Wildlands will
continue to monitor this area for emergence of woody species. If species density does not continue to
improve, supplemental planting may be needed.
2.4 Conclusions
The 2020 vegetation monitoring data reflects that the trees planted in the Parcel have not suffered
significant mortality and there still exists a diversity of tree species. A few problem areas were identified
including two areas of easement encroachment, a few areas of invasive plant populations
(Johnsongrass), and three low stem-density areas.The encroachment issue is being addressed with the
landowner, and the Johnsongrass and low stem-density areas will be monitored and addressed during
the appropriate time of year.The Parcel is currently on a trajectory to achieve the final vegetative
success criteria of 260 stems per acre by the end of Monitoring Year 5.
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 7

Section 3: REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth,Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS),
2009. Cape Fear Basin Restoration Priorities.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed Planning/Cape Fear River Basin/R
B R P%20Ca pe Fea r%202009%20 Rev i sed%20032013.pdf
Peet, R.K.,T.R.Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. NC
Natural Heritage Program. https://files.nc.gov/dncr-nhp/documents/files/Natural-Community-
Classification-Fourth-Approximation-2012.pdf
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2012. Loflin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site, Mitigation Plan. Charlotte, NC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2019. Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel, Bank Parcel Development
Package. Charlotte, NC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2020. Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel, As-built & Baseline
Monitoring Report. Charlotte, NC
Wildlands Holdings V, LLC. 2019. Randleman Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument. NCDEQ DWR,
Raleigh, NC. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks
Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1 Report—Draft Page 8

APPENDIX A. General Tables and Figures

Table la. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No.2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Mitigation Activities by Drainage Feature-Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Riparian Buffer Total o/Total
Feature Name Restoration Restoration Restoration Enhancement Enhancement Preservation Preservation Preservation Mitigation
0'-50'(ac) 51'-100'(ac) 101'-200'(ac) 0'-50'(ac) 51'-100'(ac) 0'-50'(ac) 51'-100'(ac) 101'-200'(ac) Acreage Area
Al 0.101 0.458 0.059 - - 0.258 - - 0.876 7.728%
B1 - 2.043 0.076 - - - 0.314 - 2.432 21.441%
B2 - 0.627 - - - - - - 0.627 5.532%
B3 - 1.817 0.042 - - - - - 1.859 16.390%
Bob Branch 1.347 1.579 0.092 0.058 0.099 1.724 0.627 0.021 5.547 48.902%
Total Acreage 1.448 6.524 0.268 0.058 0.099 1.983 0.941 0.021 11.342
%Total Area 12.766% 57.518% 2.367% 0.511% 0.876% 17.481%* 8.296%* 0.186%* 100.000%
*This percentage is based on total area being preserved,not total creditable area

Table lb. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No.2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Riparian Buffer Credit Generation Summary-Loflin Dairy Phase 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
Eligible
Mitigation Riparian Eligible Total Square %of Full Credited Credit Square Mitigation Credits
Feature ID* Credit Type Total Acreage Square Credit Ratio Z
Type Width Acreage** Feet Credit Acreage(ac) Footage(ft) (ft)
Feet**
Al,Bob Branch TOB-50' 1.448 1.45 63,071 63,071 100% 1.45 63,071 63,071
Restoration Al,B2,B3,Bob Branch 51'-100' Riparian Buffer 6.524 6.52 284,177 284,177 1:1 100% 6.52 284,177 284,177
Al,Bl,B3,Bob Branch 101'-200' 0.268 0.27 11,693 11,693 33% 0.09 3,859 3,859
TOB-50' 0.058 0.06 2,524 2,524 100% 0.03 1,262 1,262
Enhancement Bob Branch 51'-100' Riparian Buffer 0.099 0.10 4,326 4,326 2:1 100% 0.05 2,163 2,163
101'-200' 0.000 0.00 0 0 33% 0.00 0 0
Al,Bob Branch TOB-50' 1.983 1.98 86,370 86,370 100% 0.20 8,637 8,637
Preservation Al,Bl,Bob Branch 51'-100' Riparian Buffer 0.941 0.85 40,992 37,148 10:1 100% 0.09 3,715 3,715
Bob Branch 101'-200' 0.021 0.00 917 0 33% 0.00 0 0
Total Riparian Buffer Restoration Credits 8.06 351,107 351,107
Total Riparian Buffer Enhancement Credits 0.08 3,425 3,425
Total Riparian Buffer Preservation Credits 0.29 12,352 12,352
Total Riparian Buffer Credits 8.43 366,883 366,883
*Areas identified for mitigation credits in the Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel are adjacent to the DMS Loflin Dairy Phase 1 Mitigation Site,but do not overlap.
**The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25%of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5).

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No. 2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Scheduled
Delivery
Bank Parcel Development Package - April 2019
Bare roots plantings - January 2020
Baseline Monitoring (Year 0) February 2020 April 2020
Invasive Species Treatment July 2020
Year 1 Monitoring September 2020 November 2020
Year 2 Monitoring December 2021
Year 3 Monitoring December 2022
Year 4 Monitoring December 2023
Year 5 Monitoring December 2024
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No. 2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Designers
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.332.7754
Project Manager(POC) Andrea Eckardt, 704.332.7754, Ext. 101
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
Planting Contractor 150 Old Black Creek Rd
Freemont, NC 27830
Dykes&Son Nursery
Nursery Stock Suppliers 825 Maude Etter Rd.
McMinnville,TN 37110
Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring (POC) Kristi Suggs,704.332.7754, Ext. 110

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No. 2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
County Randolph
Project Area (acres) 12.0
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) 35° 50' 45.2"N, 79° 52' 20.4"W
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG) 2655/ 1041
Total Credits (BMU) 366,883
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer
PROJECT WATERSHED INFORMATION
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
Hydrologic Unit Code 03030003-010060
DWR Sub-basin 03-06-08
Project Drainage Area (acres) 883
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2.8%
CGIA Land Use Classification 57% Pasture/Grass, 28% Forest/Shrub, <1% water, 14% Developed
Table 5. Monitoring Components Summary
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No. 2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Parameter Monitoring Feature Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency
Bobs Branch Al B1 B2 B3
Vegetation CVS Level 1 & 2 6 Annual
Visual Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Project Boundary Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Reference Photos Drone Photographs Annual

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No.2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Planted Acreage 8.40
Mapping of
Number of Combined
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Planted
Polygons Acreage
(acres) Acreage
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material 0.1 0 0.0 0%
i Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,4, or 5 0
Low Stem Density Areas 0.1 3 0.5 6%
stem count criteria.
Total 3 0.0 6%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the
0.0 0 0.0 0%
Vigor monitoring year.
Cumulative Total 3 0.0 6%
Easement Acreage 12.0
Mapping of
Number of Combined
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Planted
(SF) Polygons Acreage Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). 1,000 6 0.3 4%
Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none 2 0.02 0%
lAcreage calculated from vegetation plots monitored for site,and visual assessement during the site walk.

y n Cf ems ' j°• TILIF'. \' 2018 Aerial Photography
;� &kru = Y r 03030003010030
T y Park Gull Y N.
'0. ,'
r Coulee / ■
.., I cFV f /
L •
.$y�. 03030003010040 /7/. , / -
fn
tip,r Iei�ky. • ►u �,
> > ,�
We granc'S` - 0303000301005 '�� •� '�t -1.
' ` f '
:0N
—• —..—..—..—•--••—••—..—..—..L.C.—••— —..—..—.-- `-- {j\\ GUILFORD I
.
•,,i RANDOLPH'''..v.., . •..4".1.4.4r7% r ' [1 t if A.N N.
I .*.
Trinity Muddy Gee '_) \.0- .-.
'�"`.. In
3 N 1.io I.,` p
� 'Y' „i• �,i •off 4, '--.� older Inman Rh.�
Yq 3 1 03030003010070
4 4 r" Arov�dence Crkrn=h Rd
G cF :220:
3 \.�,.\ S�y�7GlenolaHd�`.` �.� dT c
' m i ; \,5„
°'Rv _ t a{ri `1�.'. P- j . 13 o L f,.
• y43040103050010 ' ' j Fpdp. �'(\ .\
Rp. j'w u 1` 6011 LnkY 1oavne r Whiten��Rd ( `!
1 PlnP $
f Roy Farlowreo, t ... W Phase I Conservation Easement Boundary
9 '03040103050040 d ' �''.`��� r--.
U /t cor.r —_j Phase II Conservation Easement Boundary
t.
2 4a`¢,a ?:5a•�- v County Boundary
N� .e L._,1 Hydrologic Unit Code(14)
r ri l'''� a Q
J l * Loflin Dairy Mitigation Bank Parcel Location
fin ,.
.try Sophia I.
Figure 1 Project Location Map
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
W I L D L A N D 5 Monitoring Year 1 2020 llkiiiipt
ENGINEERING IIIIIIIII N Cape Fear River Basin (3030003)
Randolph County, NC

I i 1 I
I I r"—"-
Y Il•-
Salem
Le i.---.! County Boundaries arsvillN Salem I Burlinglan !1eban
r•:•r,•+ j 8I Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC)03030003 •�
j elm
.` -
Forsyth I
,�•'^ •j i i * Loflin Dairy Mitigation Bank Parcel Location
•`ojov . ..i.74R e /
�•o • _.._.._.._.._..c_ir_rd_—.. I ,I,..IIlrll •rr�•
1�
••..: I h• } ilk
— — 1 �,
i ._ _ !Durham
.. ._..�
f.�; I Lrb.l ry .
' .,J
I 1
I
-s I1
•.•.►.�`..�. Io ! .•II•I Ir, Plttsbaro 6.: P
ex
.! .7,, Ashebi o B Everer[
m j i' Jordan •m a
'�Y Flrvv. Lake g •,wfi'
'<I I,,, i
•• I • k4�a Holly
�\ I yoe Springs
• ! 03030003 j"
1 2 ! �S..M
i'..i a• L,•-• '� Fuqua).-
,,'•� I - I .� ••••,... Varina
t 1 ! 1 �;.s 1••
C'h fir• •'�••....
%
._.._.._.._..�..._.._.._ f_.._.._..i ._.._..�.._.._. Moore ••_.._.._..�.._,..� •// . ;rA
%.
/• . i .• /• Raven
y •. .�,•1• ira••I • Rxk
U�3 = y , •� a Stale Park
N.
i tj
`. S /`r` BIl IES
..
/, Lillington Creek
I' kbunr.•t Llwhanra , 2� opk - p/•
Albemarle Stine Pe. rJarivpn�al Troy t3rcoe� pv. 1 .'f,^
�• _ f ••.• s69 R Emu
I / Walkertown
1 '•t Cohene -A•
1 1� ••ti 'vrr ., �gCumb fir•'
\ • Lumbee
•' i _..s..r..' .A 6::
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
kiii,IPNW W I L D L A N D S 0 5 10 20 Miles Monitoring Year 1-2020
ENGINEERING I I I I I I I I I N Cape Fear River Basin (3030003)
Randolph County, NC

. • SEMIElini I'
Parcel Boundary
L.‹ Phase I Conservation Easement Boundary
• ` �. - r Phase II Conservation Easement Boundary
/ �`N. 5'Easement Break it
. ! Buffer Restoration
/ Buffer Enhancement
%
/ _ Buffer Preservation
0 %. r Project Streams
/ Non-Project Streams
,I i ,. Existing Tree Line
I / I •
\ 1 ..,
�j♦� .:..
: 4 i '
I ►♦♦ `
. .
N.
11. tlif, I 0
•
Loftin dairy Rd
\ ;..h . ',.%:1. ..C.M'Alailli_ . .... ..,- . _ '. rile[i lam
Figure 3 Project Components/Assets Map
IPICZ
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
W I L D L A N D 5 0 200 400 800 Feet Monitoring Year 1-2020
ENGINEER U N G I I I I I I I I I Cape Fear River Basin (3030003)
Randolph County, NC

r
ti` I= Parcel Boundary
/ j � Phase I Conservation Easement Boundary
.�
I.` ) ; •"`�, ; '•_—i Phase II Conservation Easement Boundary
,•. /' - Buffer Restoration
/ VII
.r F_ Buffer Enhancement
!
I
/�... / PP4 't •• • . . • Buffer Preservation
Project Streams
r Non-Project Streams
Existing Tree Line
y
�
. Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1
•
i i Criteria Met
0 , .. \ ;
'.I 1 ■ �, i Johnsongrass
•f. 1 ‘ ..� /,�� Low Stem Density
,
( t ►�./ I
Encroachment
_ ' 0 Drone Photo Points&View Angle
1'
"' 70' Easement Break 4_4 j 4-
. PP3 i R
■! - - - I % ' ''',,: NI
't,
. I ; tii
7,„ ..4•40., t
r An♦4 • 1 3� . t ' i ' -j cl
I • - L_, 60' Easement B'.
30'Access — .. �� --
1p
Easement Break ' �. P8 Rips r
ilb
"A. •
'a:, , r \ sue,, / frt �.
i
T •••••• .T• i tiOAIV''' • : _ i gr
;
--_,..k......ji * •
. . .,- .4-."-.7: -.1k.:4 •, ,0 1/4, '1/4 .. ii. ,PP9 .., — /
;. `. AF -410 /
_�PP10 `�
r •ti _..v.: #. /i' " ■ •
L. Ru�,r�itl-,c see �.— A —!
Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map
ktillvp,' WILDLA_NDS 0 125 250 500 Feet Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2020
ENGINEERING 111111111 Cape Fear River Basin (3030003)
Randolph County, NC

APPENDIX B. Bank Credit Ledgers

Randleman Umbrella Mitigation Bank Instrument(UMBI)
Loflin Dairy Phase II Bank Parcel
Cape Fear HUC(03030003) W I LD LAN D S 0
Buffer Credit Ledger HOLDINGS
Date Last Updated: edger 10-13-2020
DWR Project#:2019-0183
Total Credits Released to Date:184,441.50
Sale/ Credits Released/Available Credits Debited/Sold From
Release Date Purchaser or%Credit Release Project Name to Bank Bank Buffer Credit Balance Gov't Requiring
Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres
7/12/2019 Bank Parcel Credit Release-Task 1(20%) 72,135.36 1.66 72,135.36 1.66 NCDWR
12/17/2019 Campground Road,LLC Campground Road Sewer Line 52,065.00 1.20 20,070.36 0.46 NCDWR
12/20/2019 Koury Corporation Services,LLC Grandover West 8,454.00 0.19 11,616.36 0.27 NCDWR
3/23/2020 Task 2 Credit Release(20%) 73,135.36 1.66 84,751.72 1.95 NCDWR
5/5/2020 Piedmont Triad Charitable Foundation DBA Wyndham Championship Sedgefield Country Club 84,751.72 1.95 - - Guilford County
9/22/2020 Task 3 Credit Release(10%) 39,170.78 0.90 39,170.78 0.90 NCDWR
Totals 184,441.50 4.22 145,270.72 3.33 39,170.78 -

APPENDIX C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No. 2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Plot Success Criteria Tract Mean
Met(Y/N)
1 Y
2 Y
3 Y 100%
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Tables-Metadata
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No.2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
Report Prepared By Sara Thompson
Date Prepared 9/8/2020 12:54
Database Name LoflinDPhll_MY1_cvs-v2.5.0.mdb
Database Location Q:\ActiveProjects\005-40011 Loflin Dairy Mitigation Bank\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 1_2020\Vegetation Assessment
Computer Name SARA2020
File Size 74268672
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata Description of database file,the report worksheets,and a summary of project(s)and project data.
Project Planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre,for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Project Total Stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre,for each year. This includes live stakes,all planted stems,and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data(live stems,dead stems,missing,etc.).
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species(planted and natural volunteers combined)for each plot;dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code 40011
Project Name Loflin Dairy Phase II
Sampled Plots 6

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Count
Loflin Dairy Phase II Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project No.2019-0183
Monitoring Year 1-2020
-. • . D. . (u 8.
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 2 Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4 Vegetation Plot 5 Vegetation Plot 6
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch,Red Birch Tree 5 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4
Junglons nigra Black Walnut Tree 1
Platonus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
Quercus michouxii Basket Oak,Swamp Chestnut Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Stem count 14 14 14 15 15 15 14 14 14 13 13 13 22 22 22 15 15 16
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247 0.0247
Species count 5 5 5 5 i 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 1 6 6 5 5 6
Stems per ACRE 567 567 567 607 607 607 567 567 567 526 526 526 890 890 890 607 607 647
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type MY1(2020) MVO(2020)
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch,Red Birch Tree 21 21 21 22 22 22
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 15 15 15 15 15 15
Junglons nigra Black Walnut Tree 1
Platonus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 25 25 25 25 25 25
Quercus michouxii Basket Oak,Swamp Chestnut Oak Tree 9 9 9 18 18 18
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 15 15 15 22 22 22
Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak Tree 8 8 8
Stem count 93 93 94 102 102 102
size(ares) 6 6
size(ACRES) 0.1483 0.1483
Species count 6 6 7 5 5 5
Stems per ACRE 627 634 688 688
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS:Number of planted stems excluding live stakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-All: Number of planted stems including live stakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T:Total stems
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers included

Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank
Monitoring Year 1
Vegetation Plot Photographs

1 ti 1 1
s ✓ li
F _r l F I �4 ♦�S �s�YS p or f
Vegetation Plot 1 (09/04/2020) Vegetation Plot 2(09/04/2020)
rt Yam. yG, # k' yjFa - -
, & . ",}` ri.: s+ ^ #, a�� „ems ,, '`:. ..
g Y
e
f: ' ' ' Tr = ' ,t-,,, ,? -'" ,
. s �� "
yg aF F 's,
Vegetation Plot 3 (09/04/2020) Vegetation Plot 4(09/04/2020)
. .
, 3 t '
144,
! 11r. i'^ :i .4 x t ,' -'' Y.. i,, }4+ ^mot,
r°RR.
m .- e,j t k u $�A •� v ail.
' ‘ • -zl... .0.,-0c, , 1.4,1.-__ , _. .
4.
it. k o I =- f h n� r �iil* amp 5 .uy >`. ` - 4- y
Ep p ; Ay?'
�( " 1 -1-' t ,: �{1::
4 .s+�'';� 0'...,� J
Vegetation Plot 5 (09/04/2020) Vegetation Plot 6(09/04/2020)

Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank(MY1)
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
Plots 1-6
Sampled:
09/04/2020
Notes:
Qu. ru. was not on the planting list, but several specimens were located within the plots.
Party:
JT Jeff Turner
ST Sara Thompson
Abbreviations for Woody Stems:
Be. ni. Betula nigra River birch
Fr. pe. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash
Ju. ni. Juglans nigra Eastern black walnut
PI. oc. Platanus occidentalis American sycamore
Po. de. Populus deltoides Eastern cottonwood
Qu. mi. Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut oak
Qu. ph. Quercus phellos Willow oak
Qu. ru. Quercus rubra Northern red oak

Plot(continued): 40011-01-0001 Feb 2020 Data z o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH i ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0001 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: C hay /a v - / / .,5-1-/, 7 NeñCheckboxifplotwasnot
anting date m/yy? /
y
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: -79.875088 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) n 35.849113 UTM Zone: 17
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 190
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height" DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.7 0.5 80.0 El //7 n y
2 Betula nigra ® R 3.3 0.6 57.0 El 57 ❑ y
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 5.8 0.5 82.0 0 81 n .2 S v"okh+.re I
4 Quercus,miehanaeii ru&re, © R 8.2 0.6 70.0 ❑ G q El 1
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 9.4 0.5 80.0 ❑ 75 ❑ V
6 Betula nigra ® R 9.6 5.3 70.0 ❑ 1 ❑ ci
7 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 5.9 5.2 82.0 ❑ 70 ❑ V
8 Betula nigra 0 R 3.3 4.9 86.0 El /6 6 ,./
9 Quercus mishatoii v k 5 rc. 0 R 8.2 4.8 79.0 ❑ Wo El 51
10 Quercus michauxii © R 0.5 5.1 70.0 ❑ 70 q
11 Betula nigra ( R 0.2 9.4 94.0 ❑ /0 5 0 y
12 Quercus michauxii Q R 2.3 9.5 77.0 ❑ 741 ❑ -2 .a ,1
13 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.6 9.5 67.0 ❑ 8 S ❑
14 Betula nigra Q R 7.1 9.4 80.0 ❑ VG 0
15 Quercus phellos ® R 9.6 9.4 108.0 DBH?❑ - b e ;/
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height I)BH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr--Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.1
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CPS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot (continued): 40011-01-0001 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & suNam plin2**:
Hei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain whytotheright.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
o
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub_
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcut-off>10cm or subsample? 100%. •1
•2
•
• 3
••
• •4
••
♦45
••
�6
•
* •7
j•
�8
��9
1Fj
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0001
Y:5
J
a J
®✓
O
®
n
U
OI
O
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 190 °
# stems: 15
map sire:
N _0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Roo[ M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4-excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVSEntry Tool ver. 2.5.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: pi/ o y / 24) - / / 5i/ al New_planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: - -- Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1"ci6M4aK rasS i�
Latitude or UTM-N: -79.876116 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) 35.84803 UTM Zone:n A 17 > 2 c �• ta C 1 v
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 153
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10IllPlot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH t, Height DBH Re-. Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
17 Betula nigra 0 R 0.0 0.9 97.0 ❑ g L '1
18 Quercus phellos a R 2.5 0.8 103.0 DBH?❑ 57 0 '1
19 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 4.9 0.7 76.0 ❑ 44 0' I
20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 6.9 0.7 89.0 ❑ fo Q 9
21 Betula nigra ® R 9.9 0.6 104.0 DBH?❑
.x. 22 QuercurrnictrAMT 1 v.,v)rk ® R 9.9 4.9 75.0 ❑ 70 2 .2
23 Platanus occidentalis © R 7.1 5.0 100.0 ❑ 9s 111 y
24 Betula nigra 0 R 5.0 5.2 95.0 0 66 El Le
25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 2.5 5.3 54.0 El .55 ❑ y
26 Platanus occidentalis , ( R 0.0 5.5 55.0 ❑ i t?`1 ❑ 41
27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 0.0 9.3 49.0 ❑ tt s 111 3
28 , Quercus phellos 0 R 2.7 9.4 94.0 E 63 ® 9
29 Betula nigra 0 R 5.2 9.5 98.0 ❑ q V Q- 3
30 Quercus phellos 0 R 7.4 9.2 83.0 ❑ .32
31 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 9.9 9.3 88.0 ❑ g3
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Sterns)Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 om*t 1DBH cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Ajo v6L4 `
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown D.3
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot (continued): 40011-01-0002 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling*_*:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. .1 .2 -.• I.:4 NS r6 17
}38 I 9 �10 FormWS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0002 • X-axis: 153° #stems: IS
N map si_e:
small
O 0 O Ecr
0 0 0
Y:5n'
0 0
4110
(0,0) X:5 m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.4
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,I-IURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0003 Party: Role: Date last planted:
w l
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 0 / p / 2o - / / ST / T r Ne lianting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: ' -79.878755 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) n
35.846196 UTM Zone: 17
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 127
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH D Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
32 Fraxinus permsylvanica O R 0.6 0.7 69.0 ❑ (, i ❑ I :n;e cl c
33 Quercus phellos O R 2.8 0.7 92.0 ❑ 7(, ❑
34 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.5 0.8 78.0 ❑ 16l0 1 ❑ y
35 Quercus.michauxii ru,bfA © R 7.6 0.9 80.0 ❑ 13 ❑ !
� !
36 Betula nigra O R 9.8 0.7 120.0 DBH?❑ I 41 { I v;h£.
37 Platanus occidentalis ® R 9.5 5.7 84.0 ❑ I3S , ❑ .
38 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.4 5.8 66.0 Li I y O .� n
39 Quercus phellos O R 5.5 5.5 63.0 0 56 ❑
40 Betula nigra O R 2.9 5.4 103.0 DBH?❑ Sal ❑r !,,,
41 Quercus phellos ® R 0.7 5.4 78.0 ❑ 72 ❑ 2
42 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.6 9.6 68.0 ❑ 2 ❑
`-I
43 Quercus miehtittleii IR,jirt^. O R 2.7 9.7 76.0 ❑ 57 ❑
44 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.9 9.7 59.0 ❑ 53 Eli!
45 Betula nigra• O R 6.9 9.8 86.0 ❑ �
46 Quercus michauxii O R 9.5 9.6 88.0 ❑ -7(.4
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
A/o 0445
5
,.
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.5
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot (continued): 40011-01-0003 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ill Explanation suisamNine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.)): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Species Name p Sub-
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
l
** • N I�
Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample.100%. 1 I 2 3 •04 S •6 r7 8 10 Form WS2,vet 9.1
I. •• •• •• •• N f�
Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0003 X-axis: 127° N #stems: is
U
map si:e:
small
� / ✓
/ O
Of O
Y:5n'
/
f ,/
r J CD
G
® 0
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.6
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CPS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0004 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 01 / col / 2 o - / / ST Sr New lanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: -79.872675 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 35.847356 UTM Zone: 17
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 108
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.Im lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
47 Quercus phellos 0 R 0.0 0.7 103.0 DBH?0 0 2 )+
48 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 2.3 0.7 63.0 ❑ (,y ❑ 4
49 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.7 0.7 85.0 ❑ l 9 3 ❑ `i
50 Betula nigra 0 R 7.3 0.7 100.0 ❑ 8 5 El y
51 Quercus phellos ® R 9.9 0.6 78.0 ❑ _ 0 d b as d
* 52 Quercus in-iehatiiii r kit,r G .{ O R 9.9 5.6 84.0 ❑ 79 ❑ ki
53 Platanus occidentalis Oj R 8.0 5.7 90.0 ❑ I 0 CI `t
54 Quercus michauxii 0 R 5.1 5.5 82.0 ❑ 7g ❑ `1
. 55 Quercus michauxii , ,e, O R 2.4 5.5 80.0 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 \)e
56 Betula nigra 0 R 0.2 5.6 115.0 DBH?❑
is
57 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.0 9.4 94.0 ❑ l 1 3 ❑ u
58 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 3.3 9.5 88.0 ❑ %Col3
a
59 Quercus phellos O R 5.6 9.5 114.0 DBH?0 - El v De d J
60 Betula nigra ® R 8.0 9.4 94.0 ❑ t U
61 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 10.0 9.4 86.0 ❑ 7 ! 111 ,,{
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.7
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Ent,y Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot (continued): 40011-01-0004 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100c m ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 2 Sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 •2 • 3 ♦•4 "5 6 �7 s8 i N 10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •. r.
Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0004 X-axis: 108° N #stems: 15
U
,�-� map sire:
small
e o
o ® CD 0 0 •
O O 0 C
Y:5rr
/ ✓ /
/
0 0 0 C C
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.8
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0005 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 0 q /c'1 /Zo - / / S T7 Newplanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: -79.872574 Datum: NAD83/W �'� ��.I, aUooms taw
(dec.deg.or m) 1,0o
Longitude or UTM-E: 35.845509 UTM Zone: 17
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 130
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH a Height DBH Re-
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout Vigor Damage Notes
63 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 0.1 0.7 65.0 El G y ❑ cf
64 Betula nigra O R 2.6 0.7 108.0 DBH?0 I o I. ❑
65 Quercus michauxii ® R 4.8 0.8 54.0 0 _ n F, Gad
66 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 7.2 0.8 64.0 ❑ t'3 ❑
67 Betula nigra O R 10.0 0.7 95.0 ❑ /`i ❑ �+
68 Quercus pltelles n,+al,a w x,+ O R 8.5 1.5 50.0 ❑ 4 S
n 3 ,ys-so{kuec,
69 Quercus-phellos,.,,+c-to xs+ O R 7.0 1.3 57.0 0 -7 5 ❑ hi
70 Quercus michauxii ® R 3.2 2.0 51.00 - n rn S; ,
71 Quercus michauxii ® R 1.4 2.3 61.0 0 )3 n =.,
r
72 Quercus phellos O R 3.7 3.8 56.0 ❑ I b ❑
73 Quercus michauxii r+nyrc ® R 0.0 5.0 80.0 0 w i,, ❑ 1
74 Quercus phellos O R 2.5 5.1 101.0 DBH?
ILK ❑ `I
75 Quercus phellos ® R 5.1 5.1 86.0 0 $ ❑ '
76 Quercus phellos O R 7.8 5.1 70.0 0 co O ❑
77 Betula nigra ® R 10.0 5.0 91.0 ❑ 6e.i ❑ Li
78 Quercus michauxii ® R 9.4 6.5 45.0
79 Platanus occidentalis ® R 8.1 6.5 60.0 El ,1j- o ❑ _
80 Quercus phellos O R 6.6 6.3 43.00 _ ❑
81 Quercus phellos O R 5.5 . 6.0 53.0 ❑ - ❑ J
82 Platanus occidentalis Q R 4.0 6.2 44.0 10 ❑ 1
83 Platanus occidentalis O R 2.7 6.7 52.0 ❑ 1 33 ❑ N
84 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.0 7.0 43.0 ❑ 17 1 ❑ -
85 Betula nigra O R 0.1 9.4 74.0 / ❑ 7 0 ❑
86 Quercus michauxii Oj R 2.8 9.4 74.0 El -- ❑ o D<,
87 Quercus phellos ® R 5.1 9.4 67.0 0 5 0 ❑ 1 5 ,
88 Platanus occidentalis g R 7.5 9.5 79.0 ❑ A p 2 ❑ L-'
89 Quercus phellos ® R 10.0 9.2 91.0 ❑ 5g ❑ Z
,o VoLS
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B Br11 and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.9
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot (continued): 40011-01-0005 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH a) ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) + (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#stems: 27 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Y Species Name Source* (m Height DBH
) (m) eim* cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /&subsampline**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10c m ❑ 50cm ❑ 100c m ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm-
Species Name 2 Sub- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cit-off>10cm or subsample?100%. •1 •2 • 3 \ •04 0-05 r6 �•7 =8 a 1410 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• '•• •• • •�
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.10
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the Cl/S Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0005 > x-axis: 130° N #stems: 27
map size:
CAPITAL LE1"1'hRS represent stems that are different from stems 0 small
marked with lowercase letters(i.e."A"is different from"a").
e - - e
O / ©J o,, o CD
o .1 j
0
O J
O O O✓ o,
Y:Q O Cf O J0 .
0
o
4 .
j
f J
O O © O
e e
(0,0) X:5m
•
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.11
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIvIal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M—missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CPS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 40011-01-0006 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 01 / oy / ac - / / ST/ s r New lanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: -79.871088 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) 35.845628 UTM Zone: 17
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 126
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Feb 2020 Data 2 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Sauce* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
90 Betula nigra O R 0.7 0.0 102.0 DBH?❑ 1 17 ❑ 3 v,r`a
91 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 0.8 2.5 88.0 ❑ I G 2 o ❑ -I
92 Quercus phellos ® R 0.7 4.9 97.0 ❑ 9 7 ❑ y
93 Platanus occidentalis ) R 0.7 7.5 74.0
l02 ❑ 3 tr+seats
94 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.7 10.0 72.0 ❑ 12 G ❑ 9
95 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 5.1 10.0 102.0 DBH?❑ 59 Q 11
96 Quercus phellos O R 5.1 7.6 80.0 ❑ 70 ❑ y
97 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.0 5.1 77.0 ❑ &Li ❑ 4
98 Betula nigra ® R 5.0 2.4 90.0 ❑ l 2 I n '-
99 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.1 0.0 67.0 ❑ Z 0 ❑
100 Quercus michauxii ® R 9.5 0.0 90.0 ❑ 7 b ❑
101 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 9.6 2.5 40.0 ❑ 72 1
102• Betula nigra ® R 9.6 5.2 95.0 0 , /o a ❑ ti
i
103 Platanus occidentalis ® R 9.5 7.7 74.0 0 // 0 ❑ '1
104 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 9.3 10.0 85.0 ❑ '-G ❑ t
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
A/0 VOG S
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.12
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS Entry Tool ver.2.5.0

Plot(continued): 40011-01-0006 Feb 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamuiing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
o Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. 01 :2 : 3 1..4 N5 f�6 I=7 1=8 9 =10 FormWS2,ver9.1
•Map of stems on plot 40011-01-0006 I+••• X-axis: 126° N #stems: Is
map site:small
® C U)
1
J
of o 0
Y:Sn 0
0 0
J f
0
� J
00 0 © 0
(o,o) x:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 13
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0—dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVSEntry Tool ver.2.5.0

APPENDIX D: Overview Photographs

Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank
Monitoring Year 1
Overview Photographs

•as. 9 _ ,c: . .' ++
11141fii
•lam . ':,,�} �,':: 1
_ . __ . , i
fir_ -- - _
Y.
-
C
3'
_ }
Photo 1—Looking S upstream Al, LB(09/09/2020)
., s'%J}
•
+x..,
°r
•4F
7 f i }
} u7 s "' ?
} j h k :z
+ac-. r
Photo 2—Looking NE downstream Bob Branch, LB (09/09/2020)

•
•
•
:, wY ?_:.,. • - try, �.
•
_ Y1 � q
: ''
Photo 3—Looking N towards downstream Bob Branch, RB(09/09/2020)
•
(4‘44‘4,.
`lam. i ' �
�eyyA°,.€o .,.' �`f 'z �r1�Lq'}-�y,,. 'dF ¢� •
� :., c ^° ` ,,6
Photo 4—Looking SW upstream Bob Brach, RB(09/09/2020)

•
•
Photo 5—Looking NE downstream B1, LB(09/09/2020)
o loto •
24.
•
•
•
Photo 6—Looking N downstream B1, RB(09/09/2020)

i
r
•
Photo 7—Looking SE upstream B3, RB(09/09/2020)
,f
ti: •3.,
•;F.
•
"'$ -.. 'F cam•.-ry
•_
,r
04- ,...11.„ ..-44 .,,,---.:.411,4*4'4,-4/;741if'4:411-- ',....04 .01:41, ,, ..___. . .:.. ... „... , _..,,,.... ......e;7-4Y.t• 14
�y i erc -z * E .!h3,°' - 144,..., y y k` a °�sr.
Photo 8—Looking SW upstream B1, LB (09/09/2020)

x
.k_,
y
If
t y g
Photo 9—Looking S upstream B2, RB(09/09/2020)
, T ram ,. y .'
y.] et[ 9l '� �i '!s`�' S S P i
1"? -'f-.�" � «.•=� #' s51 ffi.y. r t S'' .:"
.l.� �•- 4 �` _k .''''A 1, i+5. ��Fp S a�' C x '9
r
x_ j � k tsl w' ' � � `� � ��C`
1i `.� C ? y ,1 1 .. �� ' ' �. •
1 `I~,V,�ry� Mr s !
"l11 '_I y�'F •� ' cif_.1 �F 1.
, 'S� I e" ��s. iYt' 1 _ 'Jr, �*� RV •r �•r r ti �
��. 1 ��4 �� �n4� � °;�.1�.,. � ��4 �'.;�/ � _.�
Photo 10—Looking N towards B1 B2 confluence(09/09/2020)

APPENDIX E: Problem Area Photographs

Loflin Dairy Phase II Buffer Mitigation Bank
Monitoring Year 1
Problem Area Photographs

i}p,{S487 T �, 1 �. e C n r ,•,k fj x!a :r ir F V - >'rl li
,, rd f t:,,,-r .ems - I t �I�.r` ��'
�` �ir .� , �►, d , r � r Ff� .,' Encroachment
T ny
...,itc
,,Ir. r._ ,- 11,4' '';,,,......:a. . L if
Easement encroachment on Bob Branch LB (Easement is everything Easement encroachment on B3 LBi (Easement is everything to the
to the right of the pole); looking NE (09/04/2020) right of the pole); looking W(09/04/2020)
,., 0„-fii.
Y W
y1 G• l
�" r 4x , •
_ fit.
Low visual stem-density on Bob Branch LB with wild grape and Low visual stem-density on Bob Branch RB; looking NE
bindweed; looking SE (09/04/2020) (09/04/2020)
�
rr c.ali9 Y Y Y
8� w ^
�a Ir
tr x �' ,.' 4': '4 F li X "ry 8`3'
t i' ,` � kr� �`1'?L
,4 ' ; � +� � �: psi
wr.ac.N ', r., -cv'+
S.
«d. 'T . Si�sa�
Invasive vegetation (Johnsongrass) on B2; looking NW(09/04/2020)