20160847 Ver 3_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20201116

ID#* 20160847 Version* 3
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/16/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/16/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Katie Webber
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20160847
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*3
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Project
County: Alamance
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Cloud & Banner Bank Parcel MY1 Report.pdf 8.62MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Kathleen Webber
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 1 Report
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Project
DWR Project # 2016-0847 Version 3
Alamance County, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake
HUC 03030002
Prepared By:
fires
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909
November 2020

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary..............................................................................................
1.1 Project Location and Description........................................................
1.2 Project Success Criteria.......................................................................
1.3 Project Components............................................................................
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach.............................................................
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions ................................................
1.6 Year 1 Monitoring Performance..........................................................
2 Methods............................................................................................................
3 Reference..........................................................................................................
Appendix A: Site Mans
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
................................... 1
................................... 1
................................... 1
................................... 2
................................... 3
................................... 4
................................... 4
................................... 5
................................... 5
n

I Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC (EBX, LLC), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions
(RES), is pleased to provide this Monitoring Report for the Cloud and Banner Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel provides riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Haw River Subwatershed of the Jordan Lake
Watershed, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030002 and
14-digit HUC 03030002030070 (Figure 1). This BPDP is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 0213.0295, 15A NCAC 0213.0240 and the RES Cloud and Banner Mitigation
Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (MBI), made and entered
into by EBX, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix
A.
The BPDP was also designed in concurrence with the Cloud and Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank (SAW 92016-02451). The mitigation plan for the Cloud and Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank was approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) in April 2019. The Cloud and Banner Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Bank is proposed to provide 4,160 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 8.20
Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking
instrument with the IRT.
The Parcel is located in Alamance County approximately three miles north of Mebane, North Carolina east
of NC Highway 119 (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within Haw River Subwatershed within the Jordan
Lake Watershed, USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002030070, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin
Number 03-06-02.
The Parcel restores and enhances stream and wetland complexes with their adjacent riparian buffers and
their functions and values to compensate, in appropriate circumstances, for unavoidable riparian buffer
impacts and nutrient load reduction requirements. When combining the Cloud and Banner Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Cloud and Banner Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the
conservation easement totals approximately 59.76 acres and includes a portion of Back Creek and four
unnamed tributaries that drain to Back Creek. The Parcel is located in an area dominated by forest and
agriculture with pockets of low -density residential areas. Past land use within the project ranges from
managed, regularly harvested hay to forested communities. The project area showed signs of past livestock
grazing and impacts from historical ditching. Historical land use had resulted in degraded water quality and
unstable channel characteristics throughout the project area.
Back Creek is the main hydrologic feature in the Parcel. There are also four unnamed tributaries and seven
wetland areas included in the Parcel (Figure 2). The five tributaries on the project site are referred to as
UT2, UT4, UT5, UT6, and Back Creek. Stream identifications and buffer viability determinations were
verified by the DWR site visit on June 21, 2016. Correspondence regarding this determination is in the
BPDP.
1.2 Project Success Criteria
Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring is based on the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a
minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least
Cloud & Banner 1 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project November 2020

5 months from initial planting. As part of the stream and wetland mitigation plan, 20 monitoring plots were
installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size in the planted area and cover at least two percent of the planted
mitigation area for the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank. The following data will be recorded for all
planted and volunteer trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All
stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape. Photographs will be taken at established monitoring
stations each monitoring year. Visual inspection reports and photographs will be provided in the annual
reports to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative
success for the Parcel are the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species
is greater than 50% of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre
at the end of Year 5. Desirable native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards
as determined by DWR. Invasive and noxious species are being monitored and treated so that none become
dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 3.66 acres (159,419.52 ft2) of riparian buffer restoration credits on
existing non -forested hayfields, and 0.15 acre (6,060.90 ft2) of buffer preservation credits. There are 0.17
acres of nutrient offset that are viable for buffer restoration credits in accordance with 15A NCAC
02B.0240. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated service Jordan Lake buffer impacts within the
Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake. The nutrient offsets generated service nutrient load reduction
requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B.0240 within the Haw River Subwatershed.
The Sponsor maintains four credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for Riparian Buffer Restoration credits,
one ledger accounts for buffer Preservation credits, one ledger accounts for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits,
and one accounts for Phosphorus nutrient offset credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these
credit ledgers. The total mitigation credits that the Cloud and Banner Bank generates are summarized in
Table 1.
Table la. Cloud and Banner Bank Parcel Riparian Buffer Credit Summary
Riparian
Credit Type
Mitigation
Existing
Used
Ratio
% Full
Mitigation
Zone
Type
Acreage
Acreage
Credit
Assets
Riparian
Restoration
3.41
3.41
1:1
100%
3.41 ac (148,383.00 sqft)
Buffer
0-50'
Riparian
Preservation
10.76
1.39*
10:1
100%
0.15 ac (6,060.90 sqft)
Buffer
51-150'
Stream or
--
--
--
--
--
Wetland
Riparian
Restoration
0.77
0.77
1:1
33%
0.25 ac (11,036.52 sqft)
Buffer
151-200'
Riparian
Preservation
0.87
0.00*
10:1
33%
0.00 ac (000.00 sqft)
Buffer
Total Restoration
4.17
4.17
3.66 ac (159,419.52 sqft)
0.15 ac 6,060.90 sqft)
Total Preservation
11.63
1.39
includes ratios & reductions
*No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation will be used for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5) and 15A
NCAC 0295(o)(4) and the rest of the area will be protected in the conservation easement and not applied for credit.
Cloud & Banner 2 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project November 2020

Table lb. Cloud and Banner Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset Credit Summary
Nutrient Offset Credit
Mitigation
Existing
Credit per
Generated
Delivery
Delivered
Zone
Credit Type
Type
Acreage
Acre
Credits
Factor
Credits
(lbs/ac)
(lbs/30 yrs)
151-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
0.17
2,249.36
382.39
36%
137.66
151-200'
Phosphorus
Restoration
0.17
143.81
24.45
18%
4.40
Total
0.17
Table lc. Alternative Crediting Scenario for Nutrient Credit Conversion to Buffer Credit
Nutrient Offset
Credit
Zone
Credit Type
Mitigation
Type
Existing
Acreage
Used
Acreage
Ratio
% Full
Credit
Mitigation
Assets
151-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
0.17
0.17
1:1
33%
0.06 (2,443.72 sqft)
Total
0.17
*The data presented in this table represent the credit potential of the proposed nutrient credits, were they to be
converted to riparian buffer credits.
The Sponsor may use the credits generated on the non -forested hayfields for Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer
Mitigation or Nutrient Offsets, but not both. All applicable ratios must be accounted for when converting
from nutrient offset to buffer. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from
DWR prior to any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each
conversion and transfer request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers
showing all transactions that have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
Buffer restoration was used along Back Creek, UT2, UT4, and UT5 in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n). Stream Restoration addresses existing impairments
including floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, nutrient input, and buffer degradation. The stream approach
included meandering the channels within the natural valley. Within the easement, riparian restoration areas
were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet, to a maximum of 200 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. As previously
described, zones dedicated to wetland restoration and additional stream credit generation will not generate
any Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset credit.
Buffer preservation was used along Back Creek, UT2, UT4, UT5, and UT6 in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5). Preservation activities consisted of
permanently protecting the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would
affect the functioning of the buffer. No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation is used
for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4) and the rest of the
area is protected in the conservation easement and not applied for credit. Furthermore, buffer preservation
can only generate Riparian Buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable to nutrient offset credits.
Cloud & Banner 3 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project November 2020

1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by selective herbicide spraying and ripping the easement. Piedmont
Alluvial Forest is the target community type for the riparian restoration areas. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in April 2020. Changes to the planting plan
included replacing green ash, paw paw, and overcup oak with pin oak, red mulberry, bald cypress, and
southern crabapple. RES is aware that bald cypress is a softwood species and will not count towards the
minimum of four hardwood species on -site. Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bareroot
availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 2.
There was one deviation in planted area from the BPDP that developed during construction and planting.
One area of approximately 9,471 square feet was not planted because it is already forested. This area was
overlooked as forested during BPDP development due to clarity issues on the aerial imagery (Figure 2).
Crediting has been adjusted for this area and it is now included as preservation. The as -built plat shows this
area as preservation (Baseline Report).
Stream construction activities were completed in April 2020. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-02451), 401 (DWR
# 16-0847), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ALAMA-2019-039) Permits. There were no
easement changes between the submittal of the BPDP Approval and the construction of the site. The
conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with Unique Places to Save signs attached to t-posts.
No livestock are present onsite; therefore, fencing was not installed.
1.6 Year 1 Monitoring Performance
The Cloud and Banner Year 1 Monitoring (MY1) activities were completed in October 2020. All Year 1
Monitoring data is presented below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting interim success
criteria.
RES installed 14 permanent vegetation plots on site with six designated for the DWR portion of the project.
Monitoring of the six permanent vegetation plots was completed in October 2020. Vegetation tables and
transect data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY data indicate that all plots
are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from
607 to 971 planted stems per acre with a mean of 803 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 14
species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted at Year 1 monitoring and are
expected to increase in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.6 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. As observed during the July site visit, the site currently
hosts pollinator -friendly herbaceous plants including Black-eyed Susan (Rudbekia sp.) and milkweed
species (Asclepias sp.). There was no encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively
affect the functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement
area. Small areas of re -sprouted Chinese privet were observed in areas that were treated at as -built. RES
will continue to treat invasive species as needed throughout the monitoring period.
Cloud & Banner 4 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project November 2020

2 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at six permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
3 Reference
EBX. 2019. Cloud and Banner Mitigation Project — Bank Parcel Development Plan.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R.. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Meuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (March 2019).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 0213.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Cloud & Banner 5 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Project November 2020

Appendix A
Site Maps

andl Ln
i
Burlington
Cloud and Banner
Site
Z
n
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Date: 3/6/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Site
Checked by: BPB
1,000
Alamance County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Hillsborough
fires

`. ^: , .'. 1.-• ; •i,: ,�,� are, .., ,.;e. ,' .dY '.'�-� �• }'. ��' ..( +, ;��. s° .a.
T'mY_.'i
11W,
: r. . r ., . .. - {":� 'Fj ,�.• , � „'4Y � �V jZ�"i q,
.. .. - _
b .; !. ,:-;-'�".'• '1 �'• -t f. <.i"!r ). °.
r+Y ..:, M1-. .�.. .; Y•M :a - .IL✓.'. :'wiM..., ;; .•�5,�y +.,• ..�+ {yy. � .r!!f;.� \ f .}. ..'i �4'Y'- �1 ri
-,f " "" 2 �$: � � - � Wan-. ( t } N+'. _ ••f! 4 r � pp¢¢..���� �jj � �
} •`;" '' _ <.:, • > , _ = ri" a• ': "` a.n !� $'r1.. v"�!'�� • �` "�� i -�' �' ✓. ra 1S A;l.m[
:�y i •�I ill. ;;tr s
ems:�" �.. ., _.' �. ...1. __r '.. ..�:^,;; ..•i. k• v°• .�' -:.e '�l n �`,.. i�' µ. n
-•-� ,.. - ,...t.., q. �:. w�,:. _ . ft t pT .j� a+d=T.,.., � t � y �l' fy � �,. .
'foie � yn �". }- �n .. t 1' �'..: ._y'iH�f f � � •• r„r.� ,'+.:. ... ... :� �.'r� .. b f ..
! /
k �r
'�,
a � �! ✓� � ate`, r - _
:
tt
Tw
al
� Y
r
i°
i
w
TIV
o _
,
� f e
4 a
Mw-
ICJ UI.A9 x.,..
fy of
='W y��•'AA �n
K
S f.
,
i
Y
�~ t- � � xb t� y�, nor � � ► t;t ! �+r. � .
v YCy y n rx' yy
i � <•r 1'�e'i i it 4 it +��. �` a} }� 7 •,YT'J",:fy �. �. �1,+i .,,(�.o-
x y u ,
L r r
y � r }

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
4,560
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
3,700
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,800
Pin Oak
Quercus palustris
2,500
Red Mulberry
Morus rubra
2,100
Southern Crabapple
Malus angustifolia
2,000
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
2,000
River Birch
Betula nigra
1,800
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
1,300
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1,300
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
1200
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
700
Total
25,960
Planted Areal
22.9
As -built Planted Stems/Acre
1 1,134
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
4
971
324
1295
Yes
1.5
5
688
81
769
Yes
2.2
6
607
40
647
Yes
1.7
7
931
40
971
Yes
1.4
8
809
0
809
Yes
1.4
10
809
0
809
Yes
1.4
Project Avg
803
81
884
Yes
1.6

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Cloud & Banner
Current Plot Data (MY1 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
04202020-01-0004
04202020-01-0005
04202020-01-0006
04202020-01-0007
04202020-01-0008
04202020-01-0010
MY1(2020)
MYO(2020)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
7
7
7
17
17
17
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
7
7
7
6
6
6
1
1
1
14
14
14
9
9
9
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
8
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
8
8
18
18
18
18
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
11
1
1
1
3
3
3
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
7
7
7
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
10
10
10
1
1
1
11
11
11
7
7
7
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
14
14
14
Quercus palustris
pin oak
ITree
6
6
61
1
11
1
31
3
31
7
7
7
3
3
31
1
20
20
20
11
11
11
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
11
11
11
7
7
7
13
13
13
33
33
33
26
26
26
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
7
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
24
24
32
17
17
19
15
15
16
23
23
24
20
20
20
20
20
20
119
119
131
132
132
132
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.15
0.15
41
4
5
61
61
8
5
5
6
51
51
5
71
71
7
3
31
3
13
131
14
12
12
12
9711
971
1295
6881
6881
769
607
607
648
9311
931
971
8091
8091
809
809
809
809
803
8031
884
890
890
890

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Cloud & Banner Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (10/15/2020)
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6
Vegetation Plot 5
Vegetation Plot 7

Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 10

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 04202020-01-0004 Oct 2020 Data N THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020-01-0004 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-�: Date: / / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): ::TX -.Axis bearing (deg): 200
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m O.lm
Oct 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
N
75
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.3
0.3
53.0
❑
76
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.2
0.3
35.0
❑
77
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.4
0.8
42.0
❑
78
Quercus palustris
O
R
3.6
1.5
62.0
❑
79
Quercus michauxii
O
R
2.7
2.2
50.0
❑
80
Quercus palustris
O
R
2.1
2.7
41.0
❑
81
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.2
3.4
55.0
82
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.4
4.1
45.0
❑
83
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.3
8.2
50.0
84
Quercus palustris
O
R
1.3
7.2
55.0
❑
85
Quercus michauxii
R
2.3
6.2
52.0
❑
86
Quercus michauxii
O
R
3.4
5.4
45.0
❑
87
Quercus michauxii
R
4.7
4.3
60.0
❑
88
Quercus palustris
R
5.9
3.2
58.0
❑
89
Quercus michauxii
O
R
6.7
2.3
37.0
❑
90
Quercus palustris
O
R
8.0
1.4
32.0
❑
91
Quercus palustris
O
R
9.1
0.4
45.0
❑
92
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.1
4.0
55.0
❑
93
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.3
5.0
55.0
❑
94
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.3
5.9
28.0
❑
95
Platanus occidentalis
@
R
6.3
6.6
36.0
❑
96
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.4
7.5
40.0
❑
97
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.4
8.5
38.0
❑
98
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.0
9.3
20.0
❑
99
Malus angustifolia
R
9.1
8.0
Missin S
❑
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0004
Oct 2020 Data
N
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#steins: 25 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): LL 10cm LL 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
**Re quiredifcut-off >10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
03
064
N5
�6 ::7
::8
} J
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0004
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 200 °
# stems: 25
map size:
N-0 small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020-01-0005
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
tcoie:
Datum:
IUTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg): 230
Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
is 90 degrees to the right of
Oct 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.Int Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
100
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
0.2
0.5
Missin g
❑
101
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.6
4.0
50.0
❑
102
Quercus palustris
O
R
1.9
3.0
53.0
❑
103
Quercus michauxii
O
R
3.0
2.2
Missin g
❑
104
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.7
0.8
38.0
❑
105
Celtis laevigata
R
8.9
1.1
90.0
❑
106
Celtis laevigata
R
7.5
2.2
58.0
❑
107
Celtis laevigata
O
R
6.3
3.0
60.0
❑
108
Celtis laevigata
R
5.1
4.1
65.0
❑
109
Celtis laevigata
O
R
3.8
5.1
45.0
❑
110
Celtis laevigata
R
2.4
6.0
85.0
❑
III
Celtis laevigata
®
R
1.2
6.8
70.0
❑
112
Betula nigra
O
R
0.1
7.7
72.0
❑
113
Betula nigra
O
R
2.0
9.8
102.0
DBH? ❑
114
Betula nigra
O
R
3.7
8.7
83.0
❑
115
Betula nigra
O
R
4.9
7.7
90.0
❑
116
Betula nigra
O
R
6.3
6.6
65.0
❑
117
Betula nigra
R
8.1
5.7
Missin g
❑
118
Betula nigra
R
9.9
4.5
Missin g
❑
119
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.2
8.7
73.0
❑
120
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.1
9.4
55.0
❑
# stems: 21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, BVSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0005
Oct 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requiredifciioff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•3
♦64
1 NS
:46 ::7
S
1
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0005
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 230° #stems: 21
0 map size:
small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020-01-0006 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / 71 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X-Axis bearing (deg): 330
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Oct 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
121
Taxodium distichum
R
0.6
0.5
72.0
❑
122
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
1.2
1.8
47.0
123
Celtis laevigata
R
1.7
3.0
43.0
❑
124
Celtis laevigata
®
R
2.1
4.0
63.0
125
Celtis laevigata
R
2.5
5.1
30.0
❑
126
Celtis laevigata
O
R
3.0
6.1
36.0
❑
127
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
4.0
9.7
70.0
❑
128
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.9
9.3
88.0
❑
129
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.3
8.0
Missin g
❑
130
Celtis laevigata
R
6.8
6.7
40.0
❑
131
Quercus michauxii
O
R
6.3
5.5
39.0
❑
132
Quercus palustris
O
R
5.8
4.4
60.0
❑
133
Celtis laevigata
O
R
5.4
3.3
25.0
❑
134
Quercus palustris
O
R
4.6
1.3
30.0
❑
135
Quercus palustris
R
4.0
0.4
51.0
❑
136
Taxodium distichum
R
9.7
1.0
71.0
❑
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0006
Oct 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcttoff>10cmorsuhsample?100%. 01
•2
•3
♦64
1 ♦45
:6 ::7
8
} 7
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0006
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 330° #stems: 16
0 map size:
small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020_01_0007 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / 71 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):710
X-Axis bearing (deg): 180
Plot Dimensions: X:Y:10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Last Year's Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
137
Quercus palustris
®
R
0.4
0.4
40.0 ❑
138
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
0.3
3.4
39.0 ❑
139
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
1.5
2.8
60.0 ❑
140
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
3.1
2.2
Missin ❑
g
141
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.3
1.4
32.0 ❑
142
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.7
0.7
36.0 ❑
143
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.8
0.3
34.0 ❑
144
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.7
2.2
78.0 ❑
145
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.8
2.7
70.0 ❑
146
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.9
3.0
60.0 ❑
147
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.6
3.7
40.0 ❑
148
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.8
4.1
50.0 ❑
149
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.7
4.7
51.0 ❑
150
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.5
5.2
51.0 ❑
151
Betula nigra
R
2.3
5.5
Missin ❑
g
152
Betula nigra
®
R
1.2
6.3
Missin ❑
g
153
Quercus palustris
O
R
0.9
8.6
40.0 ❑
154
Quercus palustris
O
R
2.1
7.9
32.0 ❑
155
Quercus palustris
O
R
3.6
7.2
33.0 ❑
156
Quercus phellos
R
5.0
6.5
50.0 ❑
157
Quercus palustris
R
6.4
5.9
38.0 ❑
158
Quercus palustris
O
R
7.7
5.4
45.0 ❑
159
Quercus palustris
R
9.2
4.6
28.0 ❑
160
Malus angustifolia
O
R
8.6
8.0
20.0 ❑
161
Morus rubra
O
R
7.2
8.8
30.0 ❑
162
Morus rubra
R
6.0
9.5
15.0 ❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0007
Last Year's Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#steins: 26 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): LL 10cm LL 50cm Li 100em Li 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
**Re quiredifcut-off >10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
0,3
064
N5
�6 ::7
::8
} J
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0007
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 180 °
N 0
# stems: 26
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020-01-0008
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
tcoie:
Datum:
IUTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg): 310
Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
is 90 degrees to the right of
Oct 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
163
Quercus palustris
R
0.5
0.4
50.0
164
Cornus amomum
O
R
5.2
0.4
51.0
165
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
2.5
2.3
30.0
166
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
1.5
3.5
54.0
167
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
0.7
4.8
45.0
168
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
0.4
6.6
52.0
169
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.2
5.9
35.0
170
Quercus phellos
®
R
3.7
4.6
40.0
171
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.1
3.0
40.0
172
Quercus palustris
O
R
9.0
3.4
45.0
173
Quercus phellos
(p)
R
8.1
4.5
40.0
174
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.0
5.5
45.0
175
Quercus phellos
R
6.2
6.5
32.0
176
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.2
7.4
40.0
177
Quercus palustris
O
R
4.5
8.6
41.0
178
Morus rubra
R
3.5
9.6
31.0
179
Betula nigra
O
R
6.9
9.6
70.0
180
Betula nigra
R
8.0
8.6
62.0
181
Celtis laevigata
O
R
8.9
7.5
40.0
182
Morus rubra
O
R
9.8
6.4
15.0
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0008
Oct 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requiredifciioff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•3
♦64
1 NS
:46 ::7
S
1
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0008
Y
0
0
®
m�
t
0
5
h
O
®
0
0
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 310° #stems: 20
0 map size:
small
N
*SOURCE: Tr -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin "are Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1,
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 04202020-01-0010
VMD Year (1-5): ❑2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
tcoie:
Datum:
IUTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg): 70
Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
is 90 degrees to the right of
Oct 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.Int Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
209
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.5
0.5
56.0
❑
210
Cercis canadensis
R
4.9
1.0
31.0
❑
211
Cercis canadensis
O
R
4.0
2.1
35.0
❑
212
Cercis canadensis
®
R
3.1
3.1
22.0
❑
213
Cercis canadensis
O
R
2.5
3.8
31.0
❑
214
Cercis canadensis
®
R
1.4
4.7
28.0
215
Cercis canadensis
®
R
0.4
5.5
40.0
❑
216
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.5
8.8
35.0
❑
217
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.4
8.2
50.0
❑
218
Quercus phellos
R
2.6
7.4
37.0
❑
219
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.7
6.4
50.0
❑
220
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.6
5.5
65.0
❑
221
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.5
4.8
34.0
❑
222
Quercus phellos
R
6.2
3.7
41.0
❑
223
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.9
2.5
65.0
❑
224
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.6
8.8
37.0
❑
225
Quercus michauxii
O
R
9.6
3.5
53.0
❑
226
Betula nigra
,
R
8.9
4.5
Missin g
❑
227
Celtis laevigata
R
8.2
5.9
Missin g
❑
228
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.3
6.7
Missin g
❑
229
Quercus phellos
R
6.2
7.8
47.0
❑
230
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.1
8.8
58.0
❑
231
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.8
9.6
45.0
❑
232
Betula nigra
O
R
8.7
8.9
Missin g
❑
# stems: 24 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
j --
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
04202020-01-0010
Oct 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & snbsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcttoff>10cmorsuhsample?100%. 01
•2
•3
♦64
1 ♦45
:6 ::7
8
}
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 04202020-01-0010
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 70' N stems: 24
�/ map size:
sm
Uall
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1