20171293 Ver 2_FINAL_Modification_MP_SAW-2017-01466_20201113

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20171293 Version*2
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 11/13/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/13/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
17 Stream r Wetlands r Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matt Butler [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20171293 Version:*2
&fisting IC# Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Green Mesa
County: Yadkin
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: GreenMesa FINAL Modification MP SAW-2017-
80.28MB
01466.pdf
Rease upload only one R7F of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matt Butler
Signature:*

3600 Glenwood Ave.,Suite 100
Or es Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
November 12,2020
Steve Kichefski Byron Hamstead
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers U.S.Fish&Wildlife Services
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville,NC 28801 Asheville,NC 28801
Todd Tugwell,
Kimberly Browning,&Casey Haywood Todd Bowers
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers USEPA,Region 4
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Ste 105 61 Forsyth Street,SW
Wake Forest,NC 27587 Atlanta,GA 30303
Erin Davis Andrea Leslie&Travis Wilson
NCDEQ,Division of Water Resources NC Wildlife Resources Commission
PO Box 29535 645 Fish Hatchery Rd.Building B
Raleigh,NC 27626-0535 Marion,NC 28752
Re: Green Mesa Final Mitigation Plan Amendment(SAW-2017-01466)
Dear Sir/Madam,
On behalf of Resource Environmental Solutions(RES)& Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (a RES
affiliate),I am pleased to submit a modification to the Final Mitigation Plan for the Green Mesa Site,a part
of the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank.
A timeline of events is as follows:
• Prospectus was placed on Public notice September 6,2017
• Initial IRT visit conducted on October 20,2017
• Initial evaluation letter issued on November 15,2017
• Draft mitigation plan was submitted in August 2018
• Final mitigation plan was submitted in June 2019
• Additional IRT visit conducted on June 25,2019
• Final mitigation plan and Yadkin 01 UMBI approval was given on December 4,2019
The attached plan is a requested modification to the Final Mitigation Plan to incorporate changes required
by Yadkin County Soil and Water to release an existing easement on the flood control pond on-site. The
alterations and updates are detailed below:
• The amended final mitigation plan presents 5,002 SMUs(3,352 in the final mitigation plan);
• The project conservation easement has been increased to 36.15 acres because of a successful
negotiation with the primary landowner and Yadkin Soil and Water Conservation to remove the
pond on-site;
• Easement breaks were removed from:
o FF1-C(Overhead Electric)
o FF1-C(Agricultural Crossing)
o FF5-A(Overhead Electric)
o FF1-E(Overhead Electric)
• The existing driveway will be relocated downstream due to dam breaching
res.us

0
o Historic wall associated with existing driveway will be removed and rebuilt to
accommodate new driveway above flood stage
o Coordination was completed with SHPO to ensure no implications with removal;
• Restoration was designed for reaches FF1-B and FF3 in coordination with the pond removal;
• Overhead powerlines will be relocated where they cross FF1-B and FF5-A:
o FF1-B overhead powerlines will be co-located with the newly constructed driveway
o FF5-A overhead powerlines will be co-located with the agricultural crossing(the easement
was widened here to accommodate the crossing and overhead lines)
• FF1-E (59 if of EII) was removed from the project because of narrow buffer and overhead
powerline interference;
• RES has supplied an updated JD with an updated aquatic resource inventory table and Waters of
the US Map based on survey data.
Below is a list of areas in the Mitigation Plan that have been updated accordingly:
• Mitigation Plan credits(Sections 1,6);
• Section 3.2—Existing Wetland and Open Waters(to include the pond);
• Section 3.4—Property,boundary,and utilities;
• Section 6—Mitigation Work Plan—Stream restoration approach on FF1-B and FF3
• Section 8 —Monitoring Plan —to reflect changes in planting area, additional cross sections, and
vegetation plots
• Section 12—Financial Assurances—to reflect changes in Construction and Monitoring costs
• Appendix B—Morph Table
• Appendix F—Updated JD
• Figures
As specified in the mitigation plan,RES requests that the initial allocation of released credits,equivalent to
15 percent of the restoration/enhancement credits and 100 percent of the preservation credits, be released
by the IRT with written approval upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
Issuance of the 404-permit verification for construction of the site,if required.
This request represents 801.3 SMUs. We look forward to discussing this modification with you in more
detail as your review progresses.
Sincerely,
Matt Butler
Project Manager
2

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
-MODIFICATION-
Green Mesa Mitigation Site
Yadkin County,North Carolina
USACE Action ID SAW-2017-01466
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101
Prepared by:
res
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc&Exchange,LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,NC 27605
919-209-1052
November 2020
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation
and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section§332.8 paragraphs(c)(2)through(c)(14)."

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Green Mesa Mitigation Site("the Project")is located in Yadkin County,approximately two miles
south of Boonville, NC. Water quality stressors currently affecting the Project include livestock
production, agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project presents 9,186 linear feet
(LF) of stream restoration,enhancement, and preservation, generating 5,002 Warm Stream Mitigation
Units(SMU)along five unnamed tributaries.
The Project is located in the Yadkin River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, Hydrologic 14-
digit USGS HUC 03040101130010, and NCDWR sub-basin 03-07-02. This HUC ultimately drains
into Deep Creek,which has a State classification as Class C waters(NCDWQ 2011).
Consisting of agricultural fields,livestock pastures and wooded areas,the Project's total easement area
is approximately 36.15 acres within the overall drainage area of 1,011 acres. Grazing livestock have
historically had access to all stream reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation,
deep-rooted vegetation, and unstable channel characteristics have contributed to the degradation of
stream banks throughout the Project area.
Goals for the Project include an increase to hydrologic function and restoration to ecological function
within the existing stream and riparian corridor and protection of these features in perpetuity. These
will be accomplished by returning the existing streams into stable conditions by constructing an E/C
type stream with appropriate dimensions and pattern,pond/dam removal,reconnecting the channel to
the floodplain,and backfilling the abandoned channel.In-stream structures will be utilized for vertical
stability and to improve habitat.Buffer improvements will filter runoff from agricultural fields,thereby
reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.Livestock exclusion fence will be installed along
the easement boundary. The widening and restoration of the riparian areas will also provide wildlife
corridors throughout the Project area. Benefits to be accrued from these activities include improved
water quality,and terrestrial and aquatic habitat.
The stream design approach for the Project is to combine the analog method of natural channel design
with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and
floodplain.The analog method involves the use of a reference reach,or"template" stream,adjacent to,
nearby, or previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog
reach are replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when
watershed and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches(Skidmore et al.,
2001).Hydraulic geometry is developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
After completion of all construction and planting activities,the Project will be monitored on a regular
basis throughout the seven-year post-construction monitoring period, or until performance standards
are met.Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team(IRT),the site will be transferred
to Unique Places to Save(UP2S).This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term
steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and
deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan i November 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Components 1
1.2 Project Outcomes 1
2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION 2
2.1 Site Selection 2
3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 4
3.1 Watershed Summary Information 4
Drainage Area and Land Use 4
Surface Water Classification 4
3.2 Landscape Characteristics 4
Existing Vegetation 4
Existing Wetlands and Open Waters 6
Geology 6
Soil Survey 6
3.3 Land Use -Historic,Current,and Future 9
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints 9
Property,Boundary,and Utilities 9
Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)/Hydrologic Trespass 9
Environmental Screening and Documentation 10
Threatened and Endangered Species 10
Cultural Resources 10
3.5 Reach Summary Information 11
Channel Classification 12
Discharge 12
Existing Channel Morphology 12
Channel Stability Assessment 14
Bankfull Verification 15
3.6 Site Photographs 16
4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL 20
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements 20
Hydrology 20
Hydraulic 20
Geomorphology 21
Physicochemical 21
Biology 21
5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 23
6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN 25
6.1 Reference Stream 25
Reference Watershed Characterization 25
Reference Discharge 25
Reference Channel Morphology 26
Reference Bankfull Verification 26
Reference Riparian Vegetation 27
6.2 Design Parameters 27
Stream Restoration Approach 27
Design Methods 30
Data Analysis 32
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan 35
Plant Community Restoration 35
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan ii November 2020

On Site Invasive Species Management 36
Soil Restoration 36
6.4 Mitigation Summary 37
6.5 Determination of Credits 37
6.6 Credit Calculations for Non-Standard Buffer Widths 38
7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 40
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria 40
Bankfull Events 40
Cross Sections 40
Digital Image Stations 40
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria 40
8 MONITORING PLAN 41
8.1 As-Built Survey 41
8.2 Visual Monitoring 41
8.3 Hydrology Events 41
8.4 Cross Sections 41
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring 42
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting 42
9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 44
10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 45
11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE 46
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits 46
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases 46
12 MAINTENANCE PLAN 48
13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES 49
14 REFERENCES 50
List of Tables
Table 1. Green Mesa Project Components Summary 1
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information 3
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information 4
Table 4. Green Mesa Vegetation Plot Summary 5
Table 5.Mapped Soil Series 8
Table 6. Regulatory Considerations 11
Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics 12
Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results 15
Table 9.Functional Benefits and Improvements 24
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison 33
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses 34
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities 34
Table 13. Proposed Plant List 36
Table 14.Mitigation Credits 38
Table 15. Stream Mitigation Credit Adjustments for Non-standard Buffer Widths 39
Table 16.Monitoring Requirements 43
Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule 47
Table 18.Maintenance Plan 48
Table 19.Financial Assurances 49
List of Charts
Chart 1. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison 26
Chart 2.Bankfull Verification 27
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan iii November 2020

List of Figures
Figure 1 —Service Area and Vicinity Map
Figure 2—USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3—Landowner Map
Figure 4—Land-use Map
Figure 5—Existing Conditions Map
Figure 6—National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 7—Soils Map
Figure 8—Historical Conditions Map
Figure 9—FEMA Map
Figure 10—Conceptual Plan Map
Figure 11 —Non-Standard Buffer Zones
Figure 12—Monitoring Plan
Appendices
Appendix A- Plan Sheets
Appendix B - Data,Analysis,and Supplementary Information
Appendix C- Site Protection Instrument
Appendix D- DWR Stream Identification Forms
Appendix E- USACE District Assessment Forms
Appendix F- Wetland JD Forms
Appendix G- Invasive Species Plan
Appendix H- Regulatory Agency Scoping Letters
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan iv November 2020

1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Components
The Green Mesa Mitigation Site ("Project") is located within a rural watershed in Yadkin County,
approximately two miles south of Booneville. The Project lies within the Yadkin River Basin, North
Carolina Department of Water Resources(NCDWR)sub-basin 03-07-02 and United States Geological
Survey(USGS) 14-digit hydrologic unit code(HUC)03040101130010(Figure 1).The Project is being
designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in the HUC 03040101.
The Project proposes to restore 3,657 linear feet(LF),enhance 5,685 LF,preserve 602 LF of existing
stream,and provide water quality benefit for 1,011 acres of drainage area.The Project is in the Northern
Inner Piedmont Level IV ecoregion.
The Project consists of two owners on six parcels. It is comprised of five unnamed tributaries totaling
9,186 existing linear feet, which eventually drain into the Yadkin River. The stream mitigation
components are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 10.The Project is accessible from Baptist Church
Road. Coordinates for the Project are as follows: 36.213246,-80.718195.
1.2 Project Outcomes
The streams proposed for restoration have been significantly impacted by livestock production,
agricultural practices, and a lack of riparian buffer. Proposed improvements to the Project will help
meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin Restoration
Priorities(RBRP)as well as ecological improvements to riparian corridor within the easement.
Through stream restoration,enhancement,and preservation,the Project presents 9,186 LF of proposed
stream, generating 5,002 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) (Table 1). This mitigation plan is
consistent with the October 20, 2017 and June 26, 2019 IRT site visit (Appendix H). Additionally,
this Mitigation Plan was previously approved under the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument on December 04,2019(Appendix B).
Table 1.Green Mesa Project Components Summary
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Base Warm SMU
Restoration 3,657 1:1 3,657
Enhancement I 474 1.5:1 316
Enhancement II 993 2.5:1 397
Enhancement II 560 3:1 187
Enhancement III 219 5:1 44
Enhancement III 3,439 7.5:1 459
Preservation 602 10:1 60
Total 9,186 5,120
Credit Loss in Required Buffer -430
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 312
Total Adjusted SMUs 5,002
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 1 November 2020

2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee RBRP identified several restoration needs for the entire Yadkin River
Basin, as well as for HUC 03040101, the Yadkin River headwaters. The Project resides in the North
Deep Creek HUC(03040101130010),which ultimately drains to the South Deep Creek Targeted Local
Watershed(TLW 03040101130020). The Yadkin River headwaters exhibit both the need for wetland,
stream,and riparian buffer restoration;more specifically the goals in the 2009 RBRP for the watershed
include:
1. Restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat in impaired stream segments;
2. Protection of high-resource value waters, including HQW, ORW, and WSW designated waters
and those containing large numbers ofrare and endangered species(Natural Heritage Element
Occurrences);
3. Continuation of existing watershed restoration and protection initiatives and projects,
including efforts funded by Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF), DWQ's 319
Program,NC EEP,Ag Cost Share Program (ACSP) and Community Conservation Assistance
Program (CCAP);
4. Collaborative efforts with local resource agencies, land trusts and willing landowners to
implement new stream, riparian buffer and wetland restoration,enhancement and preservation
projects within TLWs;
5. Improved management ofstormwater runoff(including the implementation ofstormwater BMP
projects), especially in urban and suburban areas contributing to downstream degradation of
stream habitat and impairment of water quality; and
6. Implementation of agricultural BMPs in order to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal
coliform to streams from active farming operations.
2.1 Site Selection
The Project was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality,
habitat, and hydrology within the Yadkin River Basin within the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee RBRP.
The site lends itself to accomplish multiple RBRP goals along Project reaches due to an absence of
riparian buffers, livestock access to the stream, and the historic land use, which has led to
channelization.Many of the Project design goals and objectives will address major watershed stressors
identified in the 2009 RBRP. Project-specific goals and objectives will be addressed further in Section
5. A project watershed map with the Project's drainage areas is shown on Figure 2 and watershed
planning priority boundaries are shown on Figure 1.
The Project will address two of the six goals outlined in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee RBRP.
Establishing riparian buffers, instream structures, and increasing bedform diversity will help address
RBRP Goal 1,but achievement will not be quantified. The Project will include the use of agricultural
BMPs to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform to streams from active farming
operations(RBRP Goal 6).
The land required for the construction,management,and stewardship of this Project includes six parcels
in Yadkin County with the following ownership in Table 2 & Figure 3. Once finalized,a copy of the
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 2 November 2020

land protection instrument will be included in Appendix C. The Wilmington District Conservation
Easement model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument.
Table 2.Project Parcel and Landowner Information
PIN
Owner of Record Or Stream Reach
Tax Parcel ID#
499000403703
Frazier Farm of North 499000217656
Carolina,LLC 499000310877 FF1-C,D,E, FF4,FF5
499000223660
499000117958
Johnson Joey C and Frazier 499000200499 FFI-A,B, FF2, FF3
Wilma Arlene Trustee
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 3 November 2020

3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Summary Information
Drainage Area and Land Use
The Project area is comprised of five unnamed tributaries, and one flood control impoundment, that
flow northwest to a first order tributary that ultimately flows to North Deep Creek. The total drainage
area for the Project is 1,011 acres (1.58 mi2). Primary land use within the rural watershed consists of
approximately 28 percent forest and 62 percent agricultural land.Impervious area covers less than two
percent of the total watershed (Table 3 & Figure 4). Within the agricultural land use, pastureland
accounts for approximately two percent of the area and cropland comprises 55 percent of the area.
Historic and current land-use within the immediate Project area have had direct livestock access to the
streams. These activities have negatively impacted both water quality and streambank stability along
the Project streams.The resulting observed stressors include excess nutrient input,streambank erosion,
sedimentation,livestock access to streams,channel modification,and the loss of riparian buffers.
Table 3.Project Watershed Summary Information
Level IV Ecoregion 45e—Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03040101130010
DWR Sub-basin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area(acres) 1,011
Percent Impervious Area <2%
Surface Water Classification
The project drains into Deep Creek, which has been classified as Class C Waters (NCDWQ 2011).
Class C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation,fishing,wildlife,fish consumption,
aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.
Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with
water where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner(NCDWQ
2011).
3.2 Landscape Characteristics
The Project is located in the Northern Inner Piedmont Level IV ecoregion, which is characterized by
rolling to hilly higher elevations than the Southern Outer Piedmont,more rugged topography,and more
monadnocks or mountain outliers than other areas of the Piedmont. It has colder temperatures, more
snowfall, and a shorter growing season than in Southern Inner, Southern Outer,Northern Outer, and
Carolina Slate Belt Piedmont regions. It has mostly mesic soils rather than the thermic soils that cover
other regions of the Carolina Piedmont.The region contains more Virginia pine and less shortleaf pine
than Southern Outer Piedmont and Carolina Slate Belt,more chestnut oak,and many mountain disjunct
plant species. Streams tend to have higher gradients than in the Outer Piedmont regions and contain
many mountain-type macroinvertebrate species.
Existing Vegetation
Vegetation around the unbuffered reaches of the Project are primarily composed of herbaceous
vegetation and some scattered trees. In general, these riparian zones are disturbed due to regular land
management activities. On June 21, 2018 three 100m2plots were surveyed along the floodplain of the
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 4 November 2020

Project to categorize the existing vegetation communities.Forested riparian areas along the majority of
the Project have been intermittently livestock-grazed and lack a well-developed understory and shrub
strata, while short reaches of enhancement and preservation represent more natural community
assemblages.For this reason,representative plots were surveyed along reaches FF1-C,FF1-D,and FF2
(Appendix B). Within each vegetation plot, all trees >5 inches (12.7cm) diameter at breast height
(DBH)were identified,measured, and used to calculate both basal area and stems per acre. Trees>54
inches (137cm) in height were used to quantify tree species diversity. Canopy species data was
calculated to quantify the existing natural community (Schafale, 2012) (Table 4). Shrub species and
herbaceous species were also identified,and the percent cover was estimated.
Table 4. Green Mesa Vegetation Plot Summary
Basal Area
Plot (ma/ha) Avg.DBH(cm) Trees per Acre Total Tree Species Natural Community
1 4.77 10.40 202.3 12 Piedmont Alluvial Forest
2 3.00 7.18 283.3 6 Disturbed Piedmont Alluvial
Forest
3 0.00 0 0 0 Pasture
AVG 2.59 5.86 161.86 6
Dominant canopy species across the Project included tulip-poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera),white oak
(Quercus alba), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), red maple (Acer rubrum), American holly (Ilex
opaca), black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), pignut hickory (Carya
glabra), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), eastern red cedar(Juniperus virginiana), black walnut
(Juglans nigra),American sycamore(Platanus occidentalis),and black cherry(Prunus serotina). Sub-
canopy species included green briar(Smilax rotundifolia),service berry(Amelanchier arborea),poison
ivy(Toxicodendron radicans),lowbush blueberry(vaccinium angustifolium),and sawtooth blackberry
(Rubus argutus). Native herbaceous species in the enhancement and preservation reaches included
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), little
heartleaf (Hexastylis minor), wild yam (Dioscorea villosa), American hog peanut (Amphicarpaea
bracteate),common blue violet(Viola sororia),sessileleaf bellwort(Uvularia sessilifolia),yellow star
grass(Hypoxis hirsute),white lettuce(Prenanthes alba),New York fern(Thelypteris noveboracensis),
devil's grandmother (Elephantopus tomentosus), strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus), spear
leaved violet(Viola hastata), frostweed(Verbesina virginica),long leaved bluet(Houstonia longifolia),
Cinquefoil (Potentilla sp), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), white snake root (ageratina
altissima), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), tearthumb (Polygonum
arifolium), golden rod (Solidago sp.), hairy agrimony (Agrimonia gryposepala), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), horse nettle (Solanum
carolinense),sweetscented joe pye weed(Eutrochium purpureum),and common boneset(Eupatorium
perfoliatum). Native grasses, sedges, and rushes present on preservation and enhancement reaches
included deer-tongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum), globe flatsedge (Cyperus echinatus), and
common sedge (Carex sp.).
Invasive species were also found within the vegetation survey plots,and in the vicinity of the site: tree
of heaven(Ailanthus altissima),Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense),multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Non-native species included red clover (Trifolium
pratense), white clover (Trifolium repens), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), annual
meadow grass(Poa annua),tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea),red fescue(Festuca rubra),bush clover
(Lespedeza sp.), ox-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), pigweed (Amaranthus albus), and common
stork's-bill(Erodium cicutarium).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 5 November 2020

Existing Wetlands and Open Waters
A survey of existing wetlands was performed on November 8, 2017. Wetland boundaries were
delineated using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Soils were characterized and classified using
the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States,Version 7.0(USDA-NRCS 2010). Within the
boundaries of the proposed Project,two jurisdictional wetlands are present near Reach FF1-B,FF1-C,
and FF3 (Appendix F & Figure 5),and are labeled as WA(Wetland A)and WB (Wetland B). WA is
approximately 5.4 acres in size and WB is approximately 0.28 acres in size. WA is well forested, and
WB is under active management for livestock. Vegetation within WA was made up of black willow
(Salix nigra),red maple,eastern red cedar,American holly,and sawtooth blackberry.Vegetation within
WB was made up of sawtooth blackberry, Pennsylvania smartweed (Persicaria pensylvanica),
tearthumb(Persicaria sagittate), soft rush(Juncus effuses),broom sedge(Carex scoparia),and purple
stem aster(Symphyotrichum puniceum). One jurisdictional pond (Pond A) is present downstream of
FF1-B and FF3 (Figure 5)and is approximately 1.91 acres in size.
A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PJD)request was sent to the USACE on December 8,2017
and the confirmed PJD was received August 23,2018(SAW-2017-01466).Wetland forms are included
in Appendix F.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) depicts two
potential wetland areas within the Project, and these were surveyed during the wetland delineation
(Figure 6). Moreover, the soils mapped along reaches FF1 and FF4 are considered predominately
hydric,and the soils downstream of the project pond are considered predominantly nonhydric and have
the potential to be hydric(Figure 7).
Geology
According to geology data from the North Carolina Geologic Survey,published in 1985,the Project is
located at the boundary of two different map units, OCg and CZma2,both occurring within the Inner
Piedmont,Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon,and Sauratown Mountain.
OCg. This map unit is associated with intrusive rock types of the metamorphosed granitic rock
formation that forms in the Paleozoic between 455 and 540 million years ago. This formation is
equigranular to megacrystic, foliated to massive; includes Toluca Granite.
CZma2. This map unit is associated with metamorphic rocks of the Metagraywacke formation that
formed in the later Proterzoic-Paleozoic between 500 and 900 million years ago. This formation
contains quartz and microcline porphyroblasts.
Soil Survey
Existing soil information from the Natural Resource Conservation Service(NRCS) shows the property
is located within the Cecil-Appling soil association. This association is deep, well-drained, medium-
textured soils found over gneiss,granite,and schist,located on broad,gently rolling ridges.
The Yadkin County Soil Survey shows several mapping units across the project. Map units include
seven soil series. The soil series found on the Project are described below and summarized in Table 5.
Project soil series are mapped by the NRCS as Clifford, Codorus, Dan River sandy loam, Fairview,
Hatboro, Rhodhiss-Stott Knob, and Siloam (Figure 7). The Clifford, Fairview, Rhodhiss, and Siloam
soils are considered well drained; Codorus soils are somewhat poorly drained; and Hatboro soils are
poorly drained.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 6 November 2020

Clifford Sandy Clay Loam.This map unit is found on interfluves and uplands.It formed from saprolite
residuum weathered from schist and/or saprolite residuum weathered from gneiss.This map unit is well
drained with moderate runoff,moderate permeability,and with no flooding or ponding.Major uses are
row crops, pasture, and forest. Where cultivated, dominant vegetation includes small grains, corn,
soybeans, hay, tobacco, and orchards. Where forested, dominant vegetation is Eastern white pine,
Virginia pine,red oak,white oak,post oak,hickory,blackgum,red maple,yellow poplar,and dogwood.
Codorus Loam. This map unit is found on floodplains and valleys. It formed in recently deposited
alluvial materials derived from upland soils materials weathered from mostly metamorphic and
crystalline rocks.This map unit is somewhat poorly drained,occasionally flooding,but does not pond.
Major land uses are row crops,pasture,and forest.
Dan River Sandy Loam. This map unit is found on valleys and floodplains. It formed from loamy
alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock. This map unit is well drained, moderate
permeability,frequent flooding,with no ponding.Major land uses are row crops,pasture,and forest.
Fairview Series. (Including Fairview sandy clay loam, Fairview clay loam, Fairview gravely fine
sandy loam, and Fairview-Stott knob complex) These map units are found on hillslopes on ridges and
uplands. They formed from residuum from felsic metamorphic or igneous rock such as mica schist,
gneiss, granite gneiss, mica gneiss, granodiorite, and granite. These map units are well drained, with
moderate permeability, and no flooding or ponding. Major uses are row crops, pasture, and forest.
Where cultivated, dominant vegetation includes small grains, corn, soybeans, hay, tobacco, and
orchards.Where forested,dominant vegetation is Eastern white pine,Virginia pine,red oak,white oak,
post oak,hickory,blackgum,red maple,yellow poplar,and dogwood.
Hatboro Soils. This map unit is found on floodplains and valleys. It formed in alluvium derived from
metamorphic and crystalline rock. It is poorly drained, frequently flooded, but does not pond. Major
uses are pasture,row crops,and forest.
Rhodhiss-Stott Knob Complex. This map unit has two main components: Stott Knob, stony; and
Rhodhiss, stony. The Stott Knob component is found on hillslopes on ridges and uplands. This
component formed from residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or schist. It is well-drained
and does not flood or pond.Major land uses are row crops,pasture,and forest.The Rhodiss component
is found on hillslopes on ridges and uplands. It formed from saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
and/or schist.
Siloam Sandy Loam. This map unit is located on hillslopes and ridges and uplands. This soil formed
form from residuum weathered from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or gneiss. It is a well-
drained soil and does not flood or pond.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 7 November 2020

Table 5.Mapped Soil Series
Map Percent Drainage Hydrologic Landscape
Unit Map Unit Name Hydric Class Soil Group Setting
Symbol
Clifford sandy clay loam,6 to Interfluves and
CcC2 10 percent slopes,moderately 0.0% Well drained B uplands
eroded
Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent ° Somewhat Floodplains and
CrA slopes,occasionally flooded 7'0% poorly drained B/D valleys
Dan River sandy loam,0 to 3
DeA percent slopes,frequently 0.0% Well drained C Floodplains and
flooded valleys
Fairview sandy clay loam, 10 Hillslopes on
FdD2 to 15 percent slopes, 0.0% Well drained C ridges and
moderately eroded uplands
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15
FdE2 to 25 percent slopes, 0.0% Well drained C Intertluves on
moderately eroded uplands
Fairview clay loam, 10 to 15 ° Hillslopes on
FeD3 percent slopes,severely eroded 0.0/° Well drained B ridges and
uplands
Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25 Hillslopes on
FeE3 percent slopes,severely eroded 0.0% Well drained B ridges and
uplands
Fairview gravelly fine sandy Hillslopes on
FgD2 loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, 0.0% Well drained B ridges and
moderately eroded uplands
Fairview gravelly fine sandy Hillslopes on
FgE2 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, 0.0% Well drained B ridges and
moderately eroded uplands
Fairview-Stott Knob complex, ° Hillslopes on
FtF 25 to 45 percent slopes,stony 0.0/o Well drained B ridges and
uplands
HsA Hatboro soils,0 to 2 percent 90.0% Poorly drained B/D Floodplains and
slopes,frequently flooded valleys
Rhodhiss-Stott Knob complex, Hillslopes on
RdF 25 to 45 percent slopes,stony 0.0% Well drained C ridges and
uplands
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 ° Hillslopes on
SmE percent slopes 0.0/° Well drained D ridges and
uplands
Siloam sandy loam,25 to 50 Hillslopes on
SmF percent slopes 0.0% Well drained D ridges and
uplands
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 8 November 2020

3.3 Land Use-Historic,Current, and Future
Historic aerial imagery indicates that the Project area has been used extensively for agricultural
purposes, and that the location of the streams has not significantly changed in over 60 years (Figure
8). The southern portions of the easement have remained forested. A federal flood control pond was
built between the northern and southern portions of the easement and was built in 1963. Several
watershed characteristics, such as groundwater, vegetation, surface drainage, and potentially soil
parameters have been modified. Soil structure and surface texture have been altered from intensive
agricultural operations.
The Project area is currently still in agricultural use and is being used as pasture for livestock.Livestock
have full access to most of the project reaches,and these reaches remain heavily impacted. Outside the
Project area is also mostly in agricultural use.
The future land use for the Project area will include an established 36.15-acre conservation easement,
that will be protected in perpetuity. The Project easement will have 9,944 linear feet of functioning
streams, a minimum 50-foot riparian buffer, and will be protected with fencing. Outside the Project
will likely remain in agricultural use.
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints
Property,Boundary,and Utilities
There are six planned crossings within the Project. These crossings will occur at easement breaks and
will allow landowners to continue current land-use and access as needed. There will be two new
crossings: a ford in the 30-foot easement break on FF5 and a ford in the 70-ft easement break on FF4-
A. There are four existing ford crossings, three will be improved(on FF1-A, FF2, and FF5), and one
will be relocated upgraded to a culvert crossing (on FF1-C). The improved ford crossings on FF1-A,
FF2, and FF5 occur at easement breaks. The ford crossing along FF1-C will be relocated to the old
driveway location, and one 72-foot culvert crossing will be installed at the 100-foot easement break
just downstream of FF1-B.
There is a powerline easement present at the northern part of the project. The powerline easement
crosses the proposed conservation easement in three places and is approximately 70 feet wide(Figure
5).This powerline easement crosses between FF4-A and FF4-B,and FF1-D in two places.There is also
an approximate 40-foot wide utility line to the south of these powerlines that crosses two stream reaches
and is collocated with the crossings on FF1-C and FF5 (Figure 5).
There is a pond present in the project area. The earthen dam is proposed to be removed as part of this
project. According to the North Carolina Dam Inventory, this dam is a low hazard (NCDEQ, 2017).
The dam was constructed in 1963 and was designed by the USDA NRCS.The dam name is Deep Creek
W/S#14(PL-566;USACE,2016),it has a height of 26.2 feet, a length of 410 feet, a hydraulic height
of nine feet,and a storage capacity of 211 acre-feet. Additional details in reference to this dam can be
found in Appendix B.
Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)/Hydrologic Trespass
According to the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Information System, the Project is entirely
outside of the FEMA 100-year flood zone (Zone AE, one percent annual chance of flooding) (Figure
9).No regulated floodway is mapped. Hydraulic modeling will not be required to determine whether
restoration activities will have an effect on 100-year flood elevations downstream. The design and
permitting of the mitigation do not require coordination with the Yadkin County Floodplain
Administrator, and a No-Rise Certification or CLOMR/LOMR will not be necessary. No hydrologic
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 9 November 2020

trespass will be permitted to adjacent properties upstream or downstream of the project. The Project
can be found on Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)Panel 4990(map number 37110499000J)and Panel
4888 (map number 3710488800J),effective date May 18,2009.
Environmental Screening and Documentation
To ensure that a project meets environmental screening, scoping letters were sent to the regulatory
agencies of the IRT(Appendix H).
Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under
provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973(ESA),as amended.The USFWS
database lists one Federally listed species that may occur in proximity to the Project:the Northern long-
eared bat(Myotis septentrionalis).No protected species or potential habitat for protected species was
observed during preliminary project evaluations. Species and species habitat listed in the USFWS
database was inspected during the field investigation to determine whether they occur at the Project.
No individual species or habitats were identified on site. Potential impacts to species and habitat off
site,downstream,and within the vicinity of the Project were also considered.
Formal USFWS consultation for the Northern long-eared bat(NLEB)is not required for this site since
it is entirely located outside of the confirmed hibernation and maternity site for the species. Therefore,
this Project has met the criteria for the 4(d) rule, and any associated take is therefore exempt.
Furthermore, the USFWS encourages tree removal outside the pup season (June 1 to July 31) and/or
active season(April 1 to October 31)to reduce the chance of impacting unidentified maternity roosts;
and to avoid clearing habitat within a five-mile radius of hibernation sites when bats are emerging from
or preparing for hibernation(April 1 to May 15 and August 15 to November 14,respectively).
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires consultation with state fish and wildlife agencies when
"waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized, permitted or licensed to be
impounded, diverted...or otherwise controlled or modified." The North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission (NCWRC) responded to the USACE Public Notice, issued on September 6, 2017, on
October 26,2017. Documentation is included in Appendix H.
Cultural Resources
A review of North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service (accessed
June 11, 2017 and June 13, 2018) database did not reveal any listed or potentially eligible historic or
archeological resources on the proposed Project property.There are no documented structures within a
half mile of the proposed easement.
There are two unlisted features on the Project that the IRT requested further coordination with SHPO.
The SHPO has been consulted about these structures. One structure is present on the left bank of FF1-
A and is remnants of a stone wall. The second structure is a stone wall crossing on FF1-C and was
constructed by the landowner's ancestors.Following consultation,the SHPO recorded these features
with the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology as sites 31YD224(present on reach FF1-A)and
31YD225 (present on reach FF1-C). Since no earthwork or heavy equipment are planned in the
immediate vicinity of either site,the proposed mitigation with have no effect. Correspondence with
the SHPO is presented in Appendix H.The mitigation treatment on both reaches is Enhancement II
and would involve livestock exclusion and riparian buffer planting.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 10 November 2020

Table 6. Regulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Documentation
Waters of the United States- Section Yes No Appendix H
404
Waters of the United States- Section Yes No Appendix H
401
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix H
National Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix H
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/Coastal Area Management No N/A N/A
Act(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Act-Essential No N/A N/A
Fisheries Habitat
3.5 Reach Summary Information
The Project area is comprised of a six-parcel easement area along Baptist Church Rd. The easement
has six agricultural crossings: one on FF5, one on FF4-A, one on FF3, one on FF1-C, and two are
easement breaks adjacent to the property line (FF2 and FF1-A) The stream channels include five
unnamed tributaries, split into eleven reaches based on proposed treatment type (Figure 5). Results of
the preliminary data collection are presented in Table 7.
In general,all or portions of FF1-A,FF1-B,FF1-C,FF1-D,FF1-E,FF3,FF4,and FF5 do not function
to their full potential;whereas FF2 seems to have functionality and is proposed for preservation only.
Current conditions demonstrate significant habitat degradation as a result of impacts from agriculture,
livestock production,and lack of riparian buffer.Being heavily eroded and incised,some of the streams
do not access their floodplains as frequently as they naturally would have prior to agricultural
operations.In the proposed restoration areas,the riparian buffer is in poor condition where much of the
riparian buffer is devoid of trees or shrubs and row crops are present up to the edge of the existing
channel. In the enhancement areas,trees are present,but understory riparian buffer has been impacted
by livestock. Habitat along the majority of the restoration reaches is poor in that there is little woody
debris or overhanging vegetation for fish cover or protection for other aquatic species. Morphological
parameters are located in Appendix B.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 11 November 2020

Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics
Drainage ABKF 1 Width Mean W/D Slope
Reach Area (acres) (ft2) (ft) Depth (ft) Ratio Sinuosity (ft/ft)
FF1-A 498 17-18.8 15-23.8 0.8-1.1 13.2-30.2 1.16 0.020
FF1-B 585 10-28.1 34.8-66.2 0.2-0.8 43.2-440.5 1.29 0.004
FF1-C 686 22.1-27.5 14.6-24.9 1.1-1.5 9.7-22.6 1.04 0.015
FF1-D 1,011 37.2 21.1 1.8 12.0 1.08 0.005
FF2 63 3.3 5.1 0.6 8.0 1.01 0.047
FF3 75 6.1-8.4 9.8-24.3 0.3-0.6 15.8-70.2 1.27 0.019
FF4-A 222 11.1 7.3-7.8 1.5 4.8 1.06 0.011
FF4-B 242 15.3 7.9-11.8 1.3-1.7 9.1 1.07 0.008
FF5 34 3.1 7.9 0.4 20.1 1.20 0.025
Channel Classification
All stream reaches have been classified as perennial or intermittent using the NCDWR Stream
Identification Form version 4.11 and are A-, B-, and E-, stream types as classified using the Rosgen
stream classification system (Rosgen, 1996). Channel characteristics are summarized in Table 7 and
Appendix B. Stream determinations have been verified by the USACE.
Discharge
Estimating flows (discharge) for the Project is difficult due to the channelization and agricultural
impacts of the existing streams.Several models,regression equations,and the Piedmont regional curves
were used to estimate existing bankfull discharges. Land use and slope were considered when the
discharge calculations were developed.All hydraulic and hydrologic analyses are discussed in Section
6.2. Data and analysis of the hydrologic and hydraulic models are included as Appendix B.
Existing Channel Morphology
FF1
Reach FF1-A is 993 linear feet and begins at the property line in the southwest corner of the Project
area and flows east to FF1-B. The reach is sparsely wooded along the channel and has pasture adjacent
to the left bank of the channel.Bed material in the channel is primarily bedrock along the upper section
of the reach before transitioning to a cobble,gravel,and sand dominated system. There are sections of
incised bank areas along the channel.Livestock have access to the entire reach and there is evidence of
an old stone dam on this reach. The average channel width is approximately 23 feet with an average
depth of approximately one and a half feet.The drainage area for the reach is approximately 498 acres.
Reach FF1-B is 1,132 linear feet and is located in the southern portion of the Project area and flows
east into a federal flood control dam. This reach is wooded along the channel and has pasture to the
north of the easement.Bed and bank stability is decent throughout the reach.There is obvious evidence
of beaver activity at the downstream portion of this reach and riparian wetlands are present.The average
channel width is approximately 12 feet with an average depth of approximately nine inches. The
drainage area for the reach is approximately 585 acres.
Reach FF1-C is 560 linear feet and begins below the federal flood control dam.The reach flows through
an open livestock pasture with minimal tree cover along the channel until tying in with Reach FF1-D.
Bed and bank stability are low throughout the reach due to heavy livestock access.A powerline crosses
this reach.There is a large intact stone wall on this reach near the downstream end.The average channel
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 12 November 2020

width is approximately 16 feet with an average depth of approximately two feet.The drainage area for
the reach is approximately 686 acres.
Reach FF 1-D is 1,452 linear feet and starts just south of the Baptist Church Road crossing and flows to
the east. The reach ultimately drains into Deep Creek. This reach is extremely incised and over-
widened.The buffer is devoid of a wooded buffer and has pasture on both sides.Bed and bank stability
are low throughout the reach due to heavy livestock access. There is a large powerline that cuts across
the stream in multiple locations. The average channel width is approximately 15 feet with an average
depth of approximately one foot. The drainage area for the reach is approximately 1,011 acres.
FF2
Reach FF2 is 602 linear feet and located along the southernmost portion of the Project and flows in a
northerly direction into reach FF1-B. This reach is wooded on both sides of the channel and does not
have livestock access.Bed and bank stability throughout this reach are high.The average channel width
is approximately six and a half feet with an average depth of approximately one foot.The drainage area
for the reach is approximately 63 acres.
FF3
Reach FF3 is 1,943 linear feet and begins at the property line in the southeast portion of the Project
area and flows in a northerly direction into a federal flood control dam and riparian wetland area. The
entire left bank is wooded,and the right bank has moderate buffer. The reach is adjacent to an actively
managed pasture,and historically has served this purpose.There is a current road crossing on this reach.
The upstream portion of the reach has signs of bank erosion and instability, while the downstream
section is more stable. The average channel width is approximately seven feet with an average depth
of around one foot. The drainage area for this section of the reach is approximately 75 acres.
FF4
Reach FF4-A is 474 linear feet and begins at the property boundary at the northwest portion of the
Project area and flows east toward FF-B. The existing buffer along the upper section is row crop up to
the banks of the channel. The upper portion of the reach has bedrock in the channel. The average
channel width is approximately eight feet with an average depth of approximately one and a half feet.
The drainage area for the reach is approximately 222 acres.
Reach FF4-B is 375 linear feet and begins after FF4-A and the powerline easement, and flows east
toward FF1-D. After crossing an existing powerline easement, the buffer becomes livestock pasture
and active signs of erosion and down-cutting are apparent.The average channel width is approximately
eight feet with an average depth of approximately two and a half feet. The drainage area for the reach
is approximately 242 acres.
FF5
Reach FF5 is 1,655 linear feet and located in the eastern portion of the Project area and flows in a
northly direction to FF1-D. The left bank is entirely wooded,and the right bank is moderately wooded
and adjacent to an actively managed pasture. Bed and bank stability are good throughout the reach.
There is a high density of Chinese privet and black walnut.The average channel width is approximately
six feet with an average depth of approximately three inches. The drainage area for the reach is
approximately 34 acres.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 13 November 2020

Channel Stability Assessment
A modified version of the channel stability assessment method ("channel assessment") provided in
"Assessing Stream Channel Stability at Bridges in Physiographic Regions"by Johnson(2006)was used
to assess channel stability for the Project's existing channels.This method may be rapidly applied on a
variety of stream types in different physiographic regions having a range of bed and bank materials.
The original channel assessment method was designed to evaluate 13 stability indicators in the field.
These parameters are: watershed characteristics (frequency of watershed disturbances such as
agricultural activities, urbanization, etc.), flow habit, channel pattern, entrenchment/channel
confinement, bed material, bar development, presence of obstructions/debris jams, bank soil texture
and coherence, average bank angle, bank vegetation/protection, bank cutting, mass wasting/bank
failure, and upstream distance to bridge. See Appendix B for a detailed description of the stability
indicators.As this method was initially developed to assess stability at bridges,a few minor adjustments
were made to remove indicators that contradict stability characteristics of natural channels in favor of
providing hydraulic efficiency at bridges. First, the "channel pattern" indicator was altered such that
naturally meandering channels scored low as opposed to straightened/engineered channels that are
favorable for stability near bridges. Secondly, the last indicator, "upstream distance to bridge", was
removed from the assessment as bridges are not a focus of channel stability for this project. The 12
indicators were then scored in the field, and a rating of excellent, good, fair, or poor was assigned to
each project reach based on the total score.
The channel assessment results(scores and ratings)for the Project are provided in Table 8.Two of the
eight project stream reaches received"Good"ratings,one reach received"Excellent"rating,while the
remaining five reaches received"Fair"ratings. Most Project streams were observed to have relatively
high bank angles, and many were found to be actively eroding. A majority of the channels have been
impacted by farming practices or livestock production and are slightly entrenched.These characteristics
are reflected in the higher channel assessment scores for average bank angle and bank
vegetation/protection. Most reaches also scored poorly for watershed characteristics since the
surrounding land use is dominated by agriculture activities.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 14 November 2020

Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results
FF1-A FF1-B FF1-C FF1-D FF2 FF3 FF4 FF5
Watershed
1 9 9 9 10 4 9 9 9
characteristics
2 Flow habit 5 5 5 5 3 5 4 5
3 Channel pattern 4 4 4 8 1 4 8 5
4 Entrenchment/channel 10 8 8 9 2 6 8 8
confinement
5 Bed material 4 4 9 6 3 7 6 7
6 Bar development 4 4 4 10 2 5 8 5
7 Obstructions/debris jams 6 6 4 8 3 6 5 6
8 Bank soil texture and 4 4 9 8 4 8 7 8
coherence
9 Average bank angle 5 5 7 8 2 5 7 5
Bank
10 7 5 9 8 6 6 8 6
vegetation/protection
11 Bank cutting 7 6 6 4 2 6 4 6
12 Mass wasting/bank 6 6 6 5 2 6 4 6
failure
13 Upstream distance to NA NA NA NA na NA NA NA
bridge
Score 71 66 80 89 34 73 78 76
Rating** Good Good Fair Fair Excellent Fair Fair Fair
**Excellent(0<Score<=36),Good(36<Score<=72),Fair(72<Score<=108),Fair(108<Score<=144)
Bankfull Verification
Bankfull is difficult and often times impossible to accurately identify on actively maintained channels
and agricultural ditches.The usual and preferred indicators rarely exist,and other factors may be taken
into consideration in order to approximate a bankfull stage. Other factors that may be used are wrack
lines, vegetation lines, scour lines, or top of a bankfull bench; however, complete confidence should
not be placed on these indicators. Along the proposed restoration reaches, the channel is generally
entrenched and actively maintained,which means bankfull indicators were very limited or non-existent.
Therefore, bankfull stage was estimated by using Piedmont Regional Curves and other hydrologic
analyses, existing cross sections, and in-house spreadsheets to estimate bankfull area and bankfull
discharge.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 15 November 2020

3.6 Site Photographs
If \y," i ' 'e(''' '\ 1..,,,,,,,,
;. ,,,„,,:,:::,*.„...,v..1„id iihh, : _., „!-,:.,4„,,,,,,,,,;,,:„..i.,-,...,:-v-, , , ,,,,,!:...,,,,,i,
{{,,
... 4401 y = 1,
Looking downstream along Reach FF 1-A Looking upstream along Reach FF 1 A
4/17/2018 4/17/2018
_
� w
a l
Looking downstream along Reach FF 1-B Looking upstream along Reach FF 1-B
4/17/2018 4/17/2018
,, ,. .0 - •-, 11 ii,.;,I ,;:f,d. ,' t. ,, Jo,,,*
.,,,,, ,,,,,,,
, --,:,.,...,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,, F :I.. '...!.•:' , , - " -4"t0
; a Q-0 .
•
iii-
X a t
az
" +fi
1 1
Looking downstream along Reach FF 1-C Looking upstream along Reach FF 1 C
4/18/2018 4/18/2018
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 16 November 2020

,
C fix . ' � Y , •e _.._ $'
�r _fir
- i y
li
Looking downstream along Reach FF 1-D Looking upstream along Reach FF 1-D
04/17/2018 04/17/2018
• "�:rt C / N. 1 ' 1}:;fir �` _ y-• .t`. o
Sri � 141'. � .�`"- '� gam.' �
r
•
ra- - r: d . ,T-
*z
'
Looking downstream along Reach FF2 Looking upstream along Reach FF2
4/17/2018 4/17/2018
i y�� r
3y 9 1 it�'rb- iYA »a ty 1 ��1�, E x ` t IAA
df1. " `
„� Y
'. —r - 3-:,;'''..S.
te` :.
Looking downstream along Reach FF3 Looking upstream along Reach FF3
4/17/2018 4/17/2018
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 17 November 2020

, ...: .f -.,•-..,':1,.....-39;#.,''''
>_r a .
l yam, •• t�
y A F
S, ,,,
A
3a
Looking downstream along Reach FF4 Looking upstream along Reach FF4
04/17/2018 04/17/2018
.0''''W.,--0.,., . —
•
; .-Ate.
Looking downstream along Reach FF4 Looking upstream along Reach FF4
04/17/2018 04/17/2018
4.
S gg 4 ■ Fh 1 � �•:
tart —. :-
�. E '.
Looking downstream along Reach FF5 Looking upstream along Reach FF5 04/18/2018 04/18/2018
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 18 November 2020

•
Standing near FF 1-B looking towards Pond A Looking upstream,from the dam,towards Pond A
07/15/2020 07/15/2020
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 19 November 2020

4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
In order to thoroughly examine the potential functional uplift to stream systems proposed for restoration
and enhancement,the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework(Framework)(Harman et.al.2012)serves
as a useful concept to understand streams and their ecological functions. The Framework presents a
logical, holistic view of streams that describes the interrelatedness of fundamental stream functions.
The Framework defines five stream function categories,ordered into a hierarchy,that demonstrates the
dependence of higher-level functions (biology, physicochemical, and geomorphology) on lower level
functions(hydrology and hydraulics). Functions that affect the greatest number of other functions are
illustrated at the base of the Pyramid, while functions that have the least effect on other functions are
illustrated at the top.Further justifying this hierarchical concept,Fischenich(2006)found that the most
critical restoration activities are those that address stream functions related to hydrodynamic processes,
sediment transport processes, stream stability,and riparian buffers.
Therefore,principles of the Framework are utilized to discuss and communicate the potential functional
uplift to streams at the Green Mesa project and to propose realistic, attainable goals and objectives.
However,the determination of credits and performance standards for the Project follow guidance put
forth by the USACE Wilmington District.
The Green Mesa Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project will provide numerous ecological and water
quality benefits within the Yadkin River Basin by applying an ecosystem restoration approach. The
restoration approach at the reach scale of this project will have the greatest effect on the hydrology,
hydraulic,and geomorphology functions of the system and is assumed to ultimately benefit the upper-
level functions(physicochemical and biology)over time,and in combination with other projects within
the watershed. Within the Project area, functional benefits and improvements related to the Function-
Based Pyramid Framework are anticipated by realizing site-specific functional goals and objectives
These goals and objectives,as they relate to the Framework,are outlined in Table 9.
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements
Hydrology
This Project intends to make significant improvements to the already functioning hydrology.Much of
the improvement will come from altering land use within these reaches' catchment areas and the
removal of a 1.91-acre flood control impoundment.By converting land-use for a significant percentage
of the catchment area from pasture to riparian forest, curve numbers will decrease, and reach runoff
will improve. By removing the flood control impoundment, the transport of water through the
watershed will not be impaired by the presence of an impoundment.
Hydraulic
Perhaps the greatest potential uplift at the Project will be achieved through establishing healthy
floodplain connectivity. Some of the reaches in the Project do not have functioning floodplain
connectivity or stable flow dynamics. Reaches where floodplain connectivity is not-functioning or
functioning-at-risk will be improved to functioning by reducing bank height ratios and increasing
entrenchment ratios. Reaches in which stable flow dynamics are not-functioning or functioning-at-risk
will be improved to functioning by constructing a new channel that is geometrically stable based on the
Project's hydrology inputs.Additionally,instream structures will be installed to address the energy and
erosive power of the water so that a stable base flow is achieved post-project.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 20 November 2020

Geomorphology
Sediment Transport will be improved in reaches that currently function-at-risk or not-functioning by
designing channels that transport sediment until it reaches an appropriate place to settle like a point bar.
Large Woody Debris Transport and Storage will be improved using woody debris such as log vanes,
root wads, log weirs, and log toes for in-stream structures on restoration reaches. The restoration
reaches are also designed to accumulate woody debris by having defined shallow riffles where cobble
catches and holds woody debris and leaf packs. Riparian vegetation is functioning in some areas but is
either functioning-at-risk or not-functioning on most reaches.Therefore,riparian buffers will be planted
out to a minimum of 50 feet to improve the riparian vegetation to functioning levels.Bed form diversity
will be improved in restoration areas by using a natural riffle pool sequence from the reference reach
to inform design of functioning riffle pool sequences in constructed channels based on reference reach
conditions. This bed form diversity will also further improve aquatic habitat. These functional
parameters are interconnected and ultimately depend on each other in order to function properly.
Therefore,by focusing improvements to these parameters,the restored channels will achieve dynamic
equilibrium and provide maximum geomorphic functional uplift.
Physicochemical
Although this Project would support the overarching goal in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin Priorities
to promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas, it is difficult to measure nutrient and
sediment reduction at this project level because they can be affected by so many variables. However,
several restoration actions are known to help reduce nutrients and sediment even though they may not
be measurable at the project level. These activities include livestock exclusion and direct removal of
fecal inputs, filtering of runoff through buffer areas, the conversion of active farm fields to forested
buffers,and improved denitrification and nutrient uptake through buffer zones.Additional benefits may
also come from functional uplift of the lower level stream functions(hydraulics and geomorphology),
which will reduce sediment and nutrients in the system through bank stabilization and reforesting.
Temperature regulation will also be improved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the
stream buffer areas. Oxygen regulation will occur through two actions: first, the temperature of the
water directly impacts the amount of gas held by the water. Therefore, through planting the buffer to
shade the channel the temperature is decreased, and dissolved oxygen is increased. Second, the log
structures placed in the stream create mixing zones where oxygen dissolves much faster than the
standard exchange rate of oxygen to dissolved oxygen. The processing of organic matter will be
improved once healthy riffles are shallow enough to catch twigs and branches that then retain leaves.
Many of these physiochemical benefits occur slowly over time and are dependent on multiple variables
within the stream ecosystem. Therefore, it is not practical or feasible to directly measure these
parameters within the monitoring time-frame of this project.With that said,it is logical to use existing
riparian buffer and visual performance standards to demonstrate the positive correlation between
geomorphic parameters and physicochemical parameters. For example, as riparian buffer trees grow,
as represented in annual monitoring reports, it is anticipated that canopy cover is actively shading the
stream channel and reducing water temperature. This is not a substitute for direct physicochemical
monitoring, but it is a useful tool to help project the long-term benefits of the Project in terms of its
functional uplift.
Biology
As mentioned for the physiochemical stream function, it will be difficult to measure the functional
uplift of the biological functions at this site within the monitoring period of the project.However,since
the life histories of many species likely to benefit from stream and wetland restoration are depending
on all the lower-level functions,the functional uplift from the hydraulic and geomorphic levels would
have a positive effect to the biology over time and in combination with other projects within the
watershed is anticipated.Again,there is no substitute for direct biological monitoring,but it is important
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 21 November 2020

to understand the hierarchy of the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework in order to help project long-
term benefits of the Project though only categories two and three(hydraulics and geomorphology)will
be directly measured during the seven-year monitoring period.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 22 November 2020

5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework,specific,attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project.
These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were
identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River RBRP. The Project
will address outlined RBRP Goals 1 and 6(listed in Section 2).
The Project goals are:
• Re-establish hydrology to a historical stream complex that has been impacted by a flood control
impoundment for over 50 years.
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner in a stable
channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and
• Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee RBRP to improve water quality
and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
The Project objectives to address the goals are:
• Design and construct stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile
based on reference reach conditions;
• Add in-stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the
project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treat exotic invasive species;
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project that will exclude future livestock
from stream channels and their associated buffers.
Anticipated functional uplift, benefits, and improvements within the Project area, as based on the
Function Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries.
While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals
within the Project parcels,we are unable to influence the effect of poor riparian buffers and livestock
impact in other areas within the watershed. However, the overall watershed functionality and health
will improve to meet the RBRP goals.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 23 November 2020

Table 9.Functional Benefits and Improvements
Existing
Level Function Goal Functional Rating/Projected Objective Measurement Method
Parameter Rating
(Reach)
Channel-Forming
Discharge
Precipitation/Runoff Percent Project drainage
Relationship Convert land-use of area converted to
streams and their riparian forest
Hvdrolojv to transport water from Flow Duration headwaters from (indirect measurement)
1 Transport of water from the watershed to the F/F pasture to riparian
the watershed to the channel in a non-erosive Flood Frequency (All Reaches) forest Percent Project area
channel manner
Catchment Remove flood control impacted by flood
Hydrology impoundment control impoundment
(indirect measurement)
Reach Runoff
Baseflow Alteration
F/F
(FF2)
il Flood Bank Cross sections
F/F Improve flood bank
Hydraulic FF1-B FF3
to transport water in a Connectivity connectivity by Crest gauges
Transport of water in the FF5)
2 stable non-erosive Flow D Dynamics
reducing bank height
channel, on the floodplain, manner y ratios and increase Bank Height Ratio
and through the sediments Groundwater/Surface FAR/F
F1-A FF1-C entrenchment ratios
water exchange Entrenchment Ratio
FF 1-E)
NF/F
(FF1-D,FF4)
Sediment Transport
Large Woody Debris F/F
(LWD)Transport (FF2) Reduce erosion rates
and Storage and channel stability
to reference reach As-built stream profile
Channel Evolution F/F conditions
Geomorphology Cross sections
to create a diverse (FF1-B,FF3,
Transport of wood and Lateral Stability
bedform FF5) Improve bedform
3 sediment to create diverse Visual monitoring
to achieve dynamic diversity(pool
bedforms and dynamic Riparian Vegetation
equilibrium equilibrium FAR/F spacing,percent Stream walks
Bedform Diversity (FF1-A,FF1-C, riffles,etc.)
FF 1-E)
Bed Material
Increase buffer width Vegetation plots
NF/F to 50 feet
Characterization (FF 1-D,FF4)
Sinuosity
Unmeasured
Objectives
F/F
(FF2) Improve stream
to achieve appropriate Water Quality temperature
° levels for water regulation through Vegetation plots
Physiochemical (indirect measurement)
temperature,dissolved Water Temperature FAR/F introduction of
Temperature and oxygen oxygen concentration, (FF1-B,FF3, canopy
4 regulation;processing of and other important Nutrient Load FF5) Established fencing and
organic matter and perpetual conservation
nutrients nutrients including but Decrease nutrient easement
not limited to Nitrogen Organic Carbon NF/F loading through (indirect measurement)
and Phosphorus (FF1-A,FF1-C, filtration of planted
Bacteria FF1-D,FF1-E riparian buffer,and
FF4) removing livestock
from the riparian
areas
Microbial
Communities F/F
(FF2) Unmeasured
Macrophyte Objective
to achieve functionality Communities
Biology * in levels 1-4 to support FAR/F Improve aquatic
19 Biodiversity and life Benthic (FF1-B,FF3, habitat through the
histories of aquatic life the life histories of Macroinvertebrate FF5) installation of habitat Vegetation plots
histories and riparian life aquatic and riparian Communities features,construction (indirect measurement)
plants and animals NF/F of pools at varying
Fish Communities (FF1-A,FF1-C, depths,and planting
FF1-D,FF1-E, the riparian buffer
Landscape FF4)
Connectivity
Not Measured(NM);Not Functioning(NF);Functioning-at-risk(FAR);Functioning (F)
°These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 24 November 2020

6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
6.1 Reference Stream
The restoration portions of the Project are characterized by livestock practices. Portions of the Project
were historically diverted to form poorly-functioning stream channels. Physical parameters of the
Project were used, as well as other reference materials, to determine the target stream type. The
"Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina" was also used to narrow the potential
community types that would have existed at the Project(Schafale,2012).An iterative process was used
to develop the final information for the Project design.
Targeted reference conditions included the following:
• Located within the Physiographic Region and ecoregion,
• Similar watershed size,
• Similar land use on site and in the watershed,
• Similar soil types on site and in the watershed,
• Ideal,undisturbed habitat—several types of woody debris present,
• Similar topography,
• Similar slope,
• Pattern common among Piedmont streams,and
• Minimal presence of invasive species.
Obtaining property owner information and owner authorization for access was another factor in locating
suitable reference sites for the Project. There was no predetermined amount of reference sites needed
as long as the site was suitable and met the parameters. Many streams in this watershed are impacted
by cattle and agricultural practices,having a minimal riparian buffer,making it difficult to find an ideal
reference for the Project site.Parts of reference stream parameters for the site proves to be ideal in both
geomorphology and habitat is located just upstream of the preservation Reach FF2 as well as off-site
reference reaches UT to Mill Creek and UT to Grassy Creek.
Reference Watershed Characterization
The first reference reach, UT to Mill Creek, is also located within the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin.
This reach is 225 feet in length,with a drainage area of 1.44 square miles(921 acres). The land use is
characterized by mostly forest(64%),herbaceous/shrub(27%),and a small amount of cultivated land.
The second reference reach, UT to Grassy Creek, is also located within the Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin. This reach is 318 feet in length,with a drainage area of 0.67 square miles(426 acres). The land
use is characterized by mostly agricultural, with mixed pines and hardwoods, and a small amount of
residential
Reference Discharge
Several hydrologic models/methods were used to develop a bankfull discharge for each reference reach.
Existing drainage area,land use, slope,roughness,and cross-sectional area were all factors considered
when performing the calculations.Using a combination of regional curves,in-house spreadsheet tools,
and a project specific regional flood frequency analysis, the existing bankfull discharge for the
references reaches was estimated at 113-122 cubic feet per second(ft3/s) and 50 cubic feet per second
for UT to Mill Creek and UT to Grassy Creek respectively. See Section 6.2 for a more detailed
description of the hydrologic analyses performed for this project.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 25 November 2020

Reference Channel Morphology
In comparison to the restoration reaches,both the onsite reference reach and the UT to Mill Creek and
UT to Grassy Creek reaches are similar is basin size and basin characteristics.When comparing pattern,
dimension and profile, dimensionless ratios were computed for proper scaling to the design based on
on-site verified bankfull widths.The designed reach would then have the necessary dimensions of either
a smaller or larger stream corresponding to differences in drainage area(Chart 2).The onsite reference
reach for FF4-B was typically 12-14 feet wide and 1.5 feet deep.The cross-sectional area was typically
around 15.6 square feet with a width to depth ratio around 9.0.For Reach FF1-D,the reach was typically
12-16 feet wide and 2.3 feet deep.The cross-sectional area was typically around 27-34 square feet with
a width to depth ratio around 8.0.For Reach FF5 the Channel Slope(S)versus Pool to Pool Spacing to
Bankfull Riffle Width(Ps/Wbkf)was used for the step pool system.
Channel Slope(S)versus Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Riffle Width (Ps 1 Wbkf)
9
8 Ps Wbkf=8.2513S-0.9799
R2=0.9226
N
a 7
L
+' GMC-B5 Step-Pools
y=9.3 x-1 os
6 R'=0.89
w
5
fa
m \\i%411.4
0 4
a)I
3
2 •1 ~s
a
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Channel Slope(%)
Chart 1. Channel Slope and Pool to Pool Spacing Comparison
Reference Bankfull Verification
Typical indicators of bankfull include vegetation at the bankfull elevation, scour lines, wrack lines,
vegetation lines, benches/inner berm, and point bars. Typical cross-sections for all reaches within the
Project were collected and analyzed for bankfull area,width, depth and discharge. The cross-sections
were plotted against the Piedmont Regional Curves for verification and analysis along with the
hydrologic analysis. Evidence that can further support the location of bankfull is the lack of any bench
or berm features within the channel, and wrack lines present within the floodplain. Based on the
analysis, the data collected lined up with in the 95% confidence interval for the cross-sectional area
further lowering the uncertainty in the proposed design bankfull area.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 26 November 2020

NC Piedmont y = 21.433x°6761
R2 = 0.9491
NCSU Piedmont Publised Data RES Green Mesa Collected Data
1000 1 1 1 11
n
t,
N 100 @J —
v
U— n_ .J 0
Q J
10 nQ Lu
`)
© ©
1 11
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
DRAINAGE AREA (M12)
Chart 2. Bankfull Verification
Reference Riparian Vegetation
The reference reach riparian community is characteristic of a Piedmont Alluvial Forest community
(Schafale, 2012). On June 21, 2018 one 100m2 plot was surveyed along Reach FF2, to categorize the
existing vegetation community.Forested riparian areas along the reference reach have not been heavily
disturbed and remain relatively intact. Project vegetation included tulip-poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), white oak, sourwood, red maple, American holly, black tupelo, American beech, pignut
hickory, flowering dogwood, eastern red cedar, black walnut, American sycamore, and black cherry.
The average basal area was approximately 4.77m2 per hectare,and the average stems per-acre was 202
stems/ac. There was a high species diversity in the herbaceous stratum, including: Christmas fern,
Virginia creeper, little heartleaf, wild yam, American hog peanut, common blue violet, sessileleaf
bellwort,yellow star grass,white lettuce,New York fern,devil's grandmother, strawberry bush, spear
leaved violet, frostweed,long leaved bluet, Cinquefoil,ebony spleenwort,white snake root,jewelweed.
Some invasive species we present at the reference reach, most notably Chinese privet and Japanese
honeysuckle.
It is anticipated that a local seed source for high dispersal species is present upstream at the Project and
will disperse across much of the Project area. These species are often found in early successional
communities and quickly fill disturbance gaps. Because many of these high dispersal species often
become aggressive in these sites, they are not included in the Restoration Planting List(Section 6.3).
Hardwood species typical of the target community were observed in adjacent and nearby communities
and were judged to be more appropriate for this site.
6.2 Design Parameters
Stream Restoration Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project will be accomplished through analyses of
geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applies a combination of
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 27 November 2020

analytical and reference reach-based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both
ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment activities may range from minor bank
grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry.For reaches requiring
full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied and verified through rigorous engineering
analyses and modeling.The objective of this approach is to design a geomorphically stable channel that
provides habitat improvements and ties into the existing landscape.
The Project will include priorities I and II stream restoration, enhancement I, enhancement II,
enhancement III, and preservation. Stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single-thread
meandering channel, with parameters based on data taken from reference sites, published empirical
relationships, regional curves developed from existing project streams, and NC Regional Curves.
Analytical design techniques will also be a crucial element of the project and will be used to determine
the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole.A conceptual plan view is provided in Figure
10.
Current stream conditions along the proposed restoration reaches exhibit habitat degradation as a result
of impacts from livestock and channelization performed to promote agricultural activities.Additionally,
the riparian buffer is in poor condition throughout the sections of FF4-B and parts of FF1-D, where
much of it is devoid of trees or shrubs, and active pasture is present up to the edge of the existing
channel.
The Project design approach began with a thorough study of existing conditions, including the onsite
streams, valleys, and watershed. Design parameters, including active channel, habitat and floodplain
features were developed from analyses performed on the reference site data. Analytical design
techniques were used to determine the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole.
Geomorphic and habitat studies will be performed concurrently with the engineering analyses. While
stream design will be verified by simulations of hydrology and fluvial processes, analogs of desirable
habitat features will be derived from reference sites and integrated into the project design. Both in-
stream and riparian habitat features will be designed. In-stream structures will be used throughout the
project to act as grade control and for bank stabilization by dissipating and redirecting the stream's
energy.Bank stability may further be enhanced through the installation of brush mattresses,live stakes
and cuttings bundles.
Sections of abandoned stream channel will be backfilled with material excavated from on site to the
elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel, installing channel plugs where
necessary. The floodplain will be planted with native species creating a vegetated buffer, which will
provide numerous water quality and ecological benefits. Stream banks will be stabilized using a
combination of grading, erosion control matting, bare-root plantings, native material revetment
techniques (i.e., bioengineering) and structure placement. The stream and adjacent riparian areas will
be protected by a minimum 50-foot conservation easement (where feasible) which will be fenced to
exclude livestock as needed.
The Project has been broken into the following design reaches:
Reach FF1-A- This reach begins on the southwest end of the project,flows east to FF1-B, and totals
993 linear feet of Enhancement II. Sparse woodland is located on the left bank, and actively managed
pasture lies just outside of the wood line.Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through
riparian buffer planting and livestock exclusion. While there are areas for spot stabilization,this is the
best approach based on the amount of bedrock in this reach. Moreover, this reach will have riparian
buffers wider than the 50-foot minimum and up to 125-feet in some places.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 28 November 2020

Reach FF1-B-This reach begins on the southwest end of the project from FF1-A, flows east through
an impoundment to a proposed easement break and culvert crossing upstream of FF1-C. The reach
totals 219 linear feet of Enhancement III and 1,267 linear feet of restoration. Enhancement activities
will include improving habitat through supplemental planting,protection of fringe wetlands,livestock
exclusion, and beaver removal. Restoration will begin approximately 100 feet downstream of the
confluence with FF2 near the upstream limits of the fringe wetland associated with the pond. This
location is located within the upper limits of the backwater influence of the impoundment and is located
upstream of where the reach becomes a multi-thread system resulting from low gradients and sediment
deposition. Restoration activities will include breaching the dam and constructing a new channel within
the old pond bottom (natural valley location) with appropriate dimensions and pattern. Much of the
channel construction through the pond will involve P2 restoration in order to excavate a new floodplain
within the sediment deposition, three to five feet in thickness, located in the pond bottom. In-stream
structures such as constructed riffles and brush toes will be installed for stability and to improve habitat.
Moreover,this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50-foot minimum,and up to 150-feet in
some places. Additionally, the existing driveway that is currently located along the dam will be
relocated to the historic driveway location, an existing stone wall, at the proposed easement break at
the end of the reach.
Reach FF1-C—This reach begins downstream of the proposed easement break and associated culvert
crossing located at the end of FF1-B and flows north to FF1-D. This reach totals 694 linear feet of
Enhancement II.There is an existing utility crossing located within the upper end of the reach that will
be relocated by others to the easement break just above the reach. Actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through buffer plantings
and livestock exclusion fencing. Minimal bank grading and buffer re-establishment is also proposed
along this reach.The restoration of the riparian areas and buffers along this reach will filter runoff from
adjacent pasture,reduce sediment loads,and provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area.
Reach FF1-D - This reach begins on the north end of the project,just downstream of Baptist Church
Road and Reach FF4-B and totals 1,391 linear feet of Restoration.Actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural
valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. In-stream
structures such as constructed riffles, brush toes, boulder riffles, and j-hooks will be installed for
stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved through buffer plantings, livestock
exclusion, and invasive species treatment. Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas that
will filter runoff from adjacent pastures,thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
There are four easement breaks along this reach to account for crossings associated with a Duke Power
transmission line and a telephone line. The riparian buffer will be less than the minimum 50-feet due
in some locations due to the presence of the aforementioned utility lines and their rights-of-way.
However, there are also portions of the buffer that exceed the minimum 50-feet and reach up to 125-
feet in width in some areas.
Reach FF2-This reach begins on the south end of the project,flows north to FF1-B.This reach totals
602 linear feet of Preservation. Dense woodland is located adjacent to the bedrock-controlled reach.
Preservation activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing. The
livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area and will remove
livestock access to the riparian areas.Moreover,this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50-
foot minimum, and up to 75-feet in some places.
Reach FF3 -This reach begins on the south end of the project and flows north into the impoundment.
The reach totals 1,829 linear feet of Enhancement III and 500 linear feet of restoration. Enhancement
activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion, invasive species treatment, and
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 29 November 2020

supplemental buffer planting. Restoration activities will include breaching the dam and constructing a
new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern. In-stream structures
such as constructed riffles and brush toes will be installed for stability and to improve habitat.
Moreover,this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50-foot minimum,and up to 150-feet in
some places.The livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area
and will remove livestock access to the riparian areas.
Reach FF4-A—This reach begins on the west end of the project, and flows southeast to FF4-B. This
reach totals 474 linear feet of Enhancement I.Actively managed pasture is present on both sides of the
reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion, buffer
plantings, and the installation of in-stream structures such as log sills and brush toes. Additional
enhancement activities will include constructing a floodplain bench along the right bank and laying
back the left bank at the upstream end of the reach.Moreover,this reach exceeds the 50-foot minimum
buffer requirement on the left bank.
Reach FF4-B - This reach begins on the west end of the project at a power line easement break just
downstream of reach FF4-A and flows east to Baptist Church Road.This reach totals 444 linear feet of
restoration and begins at the bedrock section.Actively managed pasture is present on both sides of the
reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural valley with
appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. Native bed material will be
harvested when possible. In-stream structures such as constructed riffles, brush toes, boulder riffles,
and j-hooks will be installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved
through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion.Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas
that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the
channel. Moreover, portions of this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50-foot minimum,
up to 125-feet in some places.
Reach FF5-A -This reach begins on the southeast end of the project and flows north to FF1-D. This
reach totals 1,586 linear feet of Enhancement III. Woodland and actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock
exclusion,invasive species treatment,removal of approximately 90 percent of the black walnut stems,
and buffer planting in areas where black walnut has been removed. Planted stems along FF5 will be
black walnut tolerant;these species are indicated on the planting plan(K-State Research and Extension,
2015).Moreover,this reach will have riparian buffers wider than the 50-foot minimum.
Reach FF5-B- This reach begins on the southeast end of the project and flows north to FF1-D. This
reach totals 56 linear feet of Restoration that ties into FF1-D. Woodland and actively managed pasture
is located adjacent to the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a new channel within
the natural valley with appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel.Habitat
will further be improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Proposed buffer activities
will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures,thereby reducing nutrient and
sediment loads to the channel.
Design Methods
There are three primary methods that have demonstrated success in stream restoration: analog,
empirical, and analytical. All three methods have advantages and limitations, and it is often best to
utilize more than one method to address site-specific conditions or to verify the applicability of design
elements. This is particularly true in developed watersheds where existing conditions do not always
reflect current inputs and events, and sediment and hydrologic inputs may remain unstable for some
time. Combinations of analytical, empirical, and analog methods were used to develop the stream
designs for the Project.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 30 November 2020

Analytical Approach
Analytical design is based on principles and processes considered universal to all streams and can entail
many traditional engineering techniques. The analytical approach utilizes continuity, roughness
equations, hydrologic and hydraulic models, and sediment transport functions to derive equilibrium
conditions. Because the Project is located within a rural watershed, restoration designs are based on
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, including rainfall-runoff models to determine design discharges
coupled with reference reach techniques.
Analog Approach
The analog method of natural channel design involves the use of a "template" or reference stream
located near the design reach and is particularly useful when watershed and boundary conditions are
similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). In an analog approach, the
pattern,dimension,and profile are used to inform design parameters for the subject stream.
Empirical Approach
Empirical design is based on regional mathematical relationships among measured channel variables.
The flood frequency analysis and regional curve evaluation described above are examples of empirical
design methods to select a range of channel forming discharges for a given watershed area.
Typical Design Sections
Typical cross sections for riffles and pools are shown on the design plan sheets in Appendix A. The
cross-section dimensions were developed for the three design reaches by using an in-house spreadsheet
described in Section 6.2 of this report. The cross sections were altered slightly to facilitate
constructability;however,the cross-sectional area,width to depth ratio,and side slopes were preserved.
Typical pool sections include pools located on straight reaches and pools on meander bends.
Meander Pattern
The design plans showing the proposed channel alignment are provided in Appendix A. The meander
pattern was derived directly from the analog reach and was altered in some locations to provide
variability in pattern,to avoid on site constraints,to follow the valley pattern,and to make the channel
more constructible. The morphologic parameters summarized in the Appendix B were applied
wherever these deviations occurred.
Longitudinal Profiles
The design profiles are presented in Appendix A. These profiles extend throughout the entire project
for the proposed channel alignment. The profiles were designed using the analog reach bed features as
a template for feature lengths and slopes.The bed slopes and bankfull energy gradients were determined
for each design reach based on the existing valley slope and the sinuosity of the design reach. Log and
rock structures will be utilized in the design to control grade,divert flows,and provide additional habitat
diversity and stability.
In-Stream Structures
Structures will be incorporated into the channel design to provide additional stability and improve
aquatic habitat.Native materials and vegetation will be used for revetments and grade control structures
where applicable.Additionally,log and rock structures will be utilized intermittently along all reaches
to provide increased stability and habitat. Typical rock structures that will protect the channel bed
and/or banks will include riffle grade controls and cross-vanes.
Woody debris will be placed throughout the channel at locations and at a frequency that is similar to
those observed in the analog reaches. Woody habitat features installed will include root wads, brush
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 31 November 2020

toes,and log vanes. Other bank stability measures include the installation of coir matting along stream
banks, live stakes, log sills, and log toes. Typical details for proposed in-stream structures and
revetments are in Appendix A.
Data Analysis
Design Discharge
Based upon the hydrologic analyses described below,design discharges were selected that fall between
model results for the 1.1-year and 1.5-year flood frequency analysis for each reach.The selected flows
for the restoration reach FF4-B is 50 ft3/s, 15 ft3/s for FF5-B and 125 ft3/s for FF1-D.These discharges
will provide frequent inundation of the adjacent floodplain.
The design discharges were selected based on the following rationale:
• The calculated bankfull discharge for the analog/reference reach and existing reaches fall
between the results of the 1.1-year and 1.5-year flood frequency analysis,
• The results of the 1.1-year flood frequency analysis are slightly higher than the NC regional
curve (Doll et al.,2002),and
• Selecting design discharges slightly higher than the 1.1-year storm events allows frequent
inundation of the adjacent floodplain.
Stream Hydrologic Analysis
Hydrologic evaluations were performed for the design reaches using multiple methods to determine
and validate the design bankfull discharge and channel geometry required to provide regular floodplain
inundation. The use of various methods allows for comparison of results and eliminates reliance on a
single model.Peak flows(Table 10)and corresponding channel cross sectional areas were determined
for comparison to design parameters using the following methods:
• Regional Flood Frequency Analysis,
• NC and VA Regional Curves for the Rural Piedmont,and
• USGS regional regression equations for rural conditions in the Blue Ridge-Piedmont.
Regional Flood Frequency Analysis
A flood frequency analysis was completed for the study region using historic gauge data on all nearby
USGS gauges with drainage areas less than 6,400 acres (10 mi2) which passed the Dalrymple
homogeneity test(Dalrymple, 1960). This is a subset of gauges used for USGS regression equations.
Regional flood frequency equations were developed for the 1.1-, 1.5-,and 2-year peak discharges based
on the gauge data. Discharges were then computed for the design reach. These discharges were
compared to those predicted by the discharge regional curve and USGS regional regression 2-year
discharge equations.
Regional Curve Regression Equations
The North Carolina Piedmont regional curves by Harman et al. (1999) and Doll et al. (2002) and the
Virginia Rural Piedmont regional curves by Lotspeich (2009) for discharge were used to predict the
bankfull discharge for the Project. The NC regional curves predicted flows that are similar to those
predicted by the 1.1-year flood frequency,while the VA curves are comparable to flows predicted by
the 1.5-year flood frequency equation. The regional curve equations for NC discharges by Doll et al.
(2002):
(1) Qb=89.04*(DA)0 73 (Harman et al., 1999)
(2) Qb=91.62*(DA)0 71 (Doll et al.,2002)
(3) Qbkr 43.895*(DA)°9472 (Lotspeich,2009)
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 32 November 2020

Where Qbkf=bankfull discharge (ft3/s) and DA=drainage area(mi2).
USGS Regional Regression Equations
USGS regression equations estimate the magnitude and frequency of flood-peak discharges. The
regression equations were developed from gauge data in different physiographic regions of the
Southeastern United States.For this analysis,there was only concern for the 2-year return interval.The
equation for the rural Piedmont/Foothills(Hydrologic Region 1)(4)is:
(4) Q2=158*(DA)0.649
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison
Drainage FFQ FFQ NC Regional NC Regional VA Regional Regional Design/
Reach Area Ac Regression Calculated
( ) Q2.2 Q2.5 Curve Q(1) Curve Q(2) Curve Q(3) Eqns.Qz(4)
FF4-B 242 49 77 44 46 17 84 50
FF5-B 35 17 25 11 12 3 24 15
FF3 75 26 39 19 20 6 30 17
FF1-B 585 80 127 83 86 40 127 70
FF1-D 1010 108 174 124 124 68 212 125
Sediment Transport Analysis
An erosion and sedimentation analysis was performed to confirm that the restoration design creates a
stable gravel bed channel that neither aggrades nor degrades over time. Typically, sediment transport
is assessed to determine a stream's ability to move a specific grain size at specified flows. Various
sediment transport equations are applied when estimating entrainment for sand and gravel bed streams
found in the piedmont. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) report, Stability Thresholds for
Stream Restoration Materials (Fochenich, 2001), was used to obtain permissible shear stresses and
velocities. Data found in this document was obtained from multiple sources using different testing
conditions. The following methods and published documents were utilized during the sediment
transport analysis:
• Permissible Shear Stress Approach,and
• Permissible Velocity Approach.
Shear Stress Approach
Shear stress is a commonly used tool for assessing channel stability.Allowable channel shear stresses
are a function of bed slope, channel shape, flows, bed material (shape, size, and gradation),
cohesiveness of bank materials, vegetative cover, and incoming sediment load. The shear stress
approach compares calculated shear stresses to those found in the literature. Shear stress is the force
exerted on a boundary during the resistance of motion as calculated using the following formula:
(1) i =yRS
i =shear stress(lb/ft2)
y=specific gravity of water(62.4 lb/ft3)
R=hydraulic radius(ft)
S=average channel slope(ft/ft)
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 33 November 2020

Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses
Allowable Shear Stressl
Reach Proposed Shear Stress at Critical Shear Stress
Bankfull Stage(lbs/ft2) (Ibs/ft2) Coarse Gravel Cobble Vegetation
(lb s/ft2) (lbs/ft2) (lbs/ft2)
FF4-B 0.74 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
FF5-B 1.32 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
FF3 0.40 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
FF1-B 0.68 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
FF1-D 0.58 >0.54 0.33 to 0.67 0.67 to 2.0 0.7 to 0.1.7
1(Fischenich,2001)
Review of the above table shows that the proposed shear stresses for the Project design reaches fall
between the critical shear stress (shear stress required to initiate motion) and the allowable limits.
Therefore,the proposed channel should remain stable.
Velocity Approach
Published data are readily available that provide entrainment velocities for different bed and bank
materials. A comparison of calculated velocities to these permissible velocities is a simple method to
aid in the verification of channel stability. Table 12 compares the proposed velocities calculated using
Manning's equation with the permissible velocities.
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities
Manning's"n" Design Velocity Permissible Velocityl
Reach Bed Material
Value (ft/s) (ft/sec)
FF4-B 0.04 2.9-3.2 Coarse gravel to cobble 2.5-7.5
FF5-B 0.04 3.8-4.7 Coarse gravel to cobble 2.5-7.5
FF3 0.04 2.1-3.6 Coarse gravel to cobble 2.5-7.5
FF1-B 0.04 3.3-4.6 Coarse gravel to cobble 2.5-7.5
FF1-D 0.04 2.7-3.0 Coarse gravel to cobble 2.5-7.5
1(Fischenich,2001)
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply, was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions.A sediment assessment within the pond bottom was performed to
inform design parameters on those restoration reaches within the pond bottom.A combination of field
reconnaissance and windshield surveys, existing land use data,and historical aerial photography were
analyzed to assess existing and past watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that
would significantly impact sediment supply. As discussed in Section 3.3,the land use throughout the
site has changed little over the past 60 years, with much of the project area being used primarily for
agricultural purposes.Much of the forested areas are located within the southern portions of the project
reaches. Land use has remained relatively constant within this rural watershed, and significant land
disturbing activities are not anticipated for the future.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 34 November 2020

Observations and assessments of these reaches upstream and/or in the preservation reaches show little
signs of aggradation (deposition) or degradation, and that the streams appear physically stable. This
indicates the reaches are able to effectively transport the sediment supplied by their respective
watersheds.There are several localized areas of instability and erosion along the channels,which appear
to be a result of livestock activity and agricultural activities occurring up to and along channel banks
and not from watershed activities.It is anticipated that sediment supply from agricultural land adjacent
to the project will decrease as buffers are enhanced and widened, and flow from existing agricultural
ditches will be diffused before entering the proposed channel.
Since little deposition or degradation(scour)was observed along the restoration reaches,it appears that
the channels are able to effectively move the sediment supplied from the surrounding watershed.
Because observed areas of degradation can be attributed to farming practices adjacent to the channel
and not watershed activities, a threshold channel design approach was used. This approach assumes
minimal movement (vertical or lateral migration) of the channel boundary during design flow
conditions, and that the channel is not sensitive to sediment supply. Additionally, grade controls have
been integrated throughout the design to provide vertical stability in the event scour should occur.
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Plant Community Restoration
The restoration of the plant communities is an important aspect of the restoration project.The selection
of plant species is based on what was observed at the reference reach, species present in the forest
surrounding the restoration site,and what is typically native to the area. Several sources of information
were used to determine the most appropriate species for the restoration project.The reference stream is
located within an intact Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest community. Dominant tree species
included tulip-poplar,white oak,sourwood,red maple,American holly,black tupelo,American beech,
pignut hickory, flowering dogwood, eastern red cedar, black walnut, American sycamore, and black
cheery. The reference site was chosen due to the stability of the channel, the physical structure of the
forest community,and to evaluate stream habitat.
A Piedmont Alluvial Forest will be the target community along all project reaches and will be
established to include a diverse mix of species. These target communities will be used for the planting
areas within the project, shown in Appendix A. The plant species list has been developed and can be
found in Table 13. Specifically, along FF5 species targeted for planting will be black walnut tolerant
(K-State Research and Extension,2015). Species with high dispersal rates are not included because of
local occurrence, adjacent seed sources, and the high potential for natural regeneration. The high
dispersal species include red maple,tulip poplar,and sweetgum.
The restoration of plant communities along the Project will provide stabilization and diversity. For
rapid stabilization of the stream banks(primarily outside meanders),silky dogwood(Cornus amomum)
and black willow(Salix nigra)were chosen for live stakes along the restored channel because of their
rapid growth patterns and high success rates. Willows grow at a faster rate than the species planted
around them, and they stabilize the stream banks. Willows will also be quicker to contribute organic
matter to the channel. When the other species are bigger,the black willows will slowly stop growing
or die out because the other species would outgrow them and create shade that the willows do not
tolerate. The live stake species will be planted along the outside of the meander bends three feet from
the top of bank,creating a three-foot section along the top of bank. The live stakes will be spaced one
per linear foot with alternate spacing vertically.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 35 November 2020

Table 13. Proposed Plant List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
%of Total
Species Common Name Unit Type Species
Spacing(ft)
Composition
Quercus nigra Water Oak 9X6 Bare Root 15
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 9X6 Bare Root 15
Betula nigra* River birch 9X6 Bare Root 15
Platanus occidentalis* American 9X6 Bare Root 15
Sycamore
Quercus rubra* Northern Red Oak 9X6 Bare Root 10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9X6 Bare Root 5
Liriodendron tulipifera* Yellow Poplar 9X6 Bare Root 10
Diospyros virginiana* Persimmon 9X6 Bare Root 5
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 9X6 Bare Root 5
Nyssa bora Black Gum 9X6 Bare Root 5
*Indicates black walnut tolerant species. These species will be targeted for planting along reach FF5
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species
Species Common Name %of Total Species Composition
Salix nigra Black willow 60
Cornus ammonium Silky dogwood 40
On Site Invasive Species Management
Treatment for invasive species will be required within all grading limits associated with stream
restoration. Invasive species will require different and multiple treatment methods,depending on plant
phenology and the location of the species being treated(Appendix G).All treatment will be conducted
as to maximize its effectiveness and reduce chances of detriment to surrounding native vegetation.
Treatment methods will include mechanical(cutting with loppers,clippers,or chain saw)and chemical
(foliar spray,cut stump,and hack and squirt techniques).Plants containing mature,viable seeds will be
removed from the Project and properly disposed. All herbicide applicators will be supervised by a
certified ground pesticide applicator with a North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services (NCDA&CS) license and adhere to all legal and safety requirements according to herbicide
labels,and NC and Federal laws.Management records will be kept on the plant species treated,type of
treatment employed, type of herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and
quantities used. These records will be included in all reporting documents.
Soil Restoration
After construction activities,the subsoil will be scarified,and any compaction will be deep tilled before
the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be
stockpiled and placed over the Project during final soil preparation. This process should provide
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Rapid establishment of vegetation will provide natural
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 36 November 2020

stabilization for the Project.
6.4 Mitigation Summary
Natural channel design techniques have been used to develop the restoration designs described in this
document. The combination of the analog and analytical design methods was determined to be
appropriate for this Project because the watershed is rural, the causes of disturbance are known and
have been abated,and there are minimal infrastructure constraints.The original design parameters were
developed from the measured analog/reference reach data and applied to the subject stream. The
parameters were then analyzed and adjusted through an iterative process using analytical tools and
numerical simulations of fluvial processes. The designs presented in this report provide for the
restoration of natural Piedmont gravel-bed channel features and stream bed diversity to improve benthic
habitat. The proposed design will allow flows that exceed the design bankfull stage to spread out over
the floodplain,restoring a portion of the hydrology for the existing wetlands.
A large portion of the existing stream will be filled using material excavated from the restoration
channel. However, many segments will be left partially filled to provide habitat diversity and flood
storage. Native woody material will be installed throughout the restored reach to reduce bank stress,
provide grade control,and increase habitat diversity.
Forested riparian buffers of at least 50 feet on both sides (when feasible) of the channel will be
established along the Project reach. An appropriate riparian plant community (Piedmont Alluvial
Forest)will be established to include a diverse mix of species.within the Project.The plant species list
has been developed and can be found in Table 13. Replanting of native species will occur where the
existing buffer is impacted during construction.
Due to the nature of the project, complete avoidance of stream and wetland impacts is not possible.
Proposed stream impacts, including stream relocation and culverts, will be replaced on site. Wetland
impacts associated with restoration and enhancement efforts will only temporarily impact wetlands and
will provide an overall increase in wetland function with the addition of native trees and shrubs along
the stream banks, and restored hydrology. All stream impacts will be accounted for in the Pre-
Construction Notification(PCN)form.
6.5 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 14 are projections based upon site design (Figure 10). Upon
completion of site construction, the project components and credits data will only be revised to be
consistent with the as-built condition if there is a large discrepancy and with an approved mitigation
plan addendum.This will be approved by the USACE.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 37 November 2020

Table 14.Mitigation Credits
The Green Mesa Site Mitigation Credits
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
Totals 5,002 NA NA
Existing Proposed Mitigati
Reach Mitigation Type Proposed Stationing Length Length SMUs
on Ratio
(LF) (LF)
FF1-A Enhancement II 1+54 to 11+47 993 993 2.5:1 397
FF1-B EnhancementBI 11+47 to 13+66 219 219 5.0:1 44
FF1-B Restoration 13+66 to 26+33 913 1,267 1.0:1 1,267
FF1-C Enhancement II(3) 27+33 to 32+93 560 560 3.0:1 187
FF2 Preservation 1+29 to 7+31 602 602 10.0:1 60
FF3-A Enhancement IIl(7.5) 0+44 to 12+23 1,179 1,179 7.5:1 157
FF3-A Enhancement III(7.5) 12+80 to 19+30 650 650 7.5:1 87
FF3-B Restoration 19+30 to 24+30 114 500 1.0:1 500
FF4-A Enhancement I 0+53 to 5+27 474 474 1.5:1 316
FF4-B Restoration 6+59 to 11+03 375 444 1.0:1 444
FF1-D Restoration 12+04 to 13+47 147 143 1.0:1 143
FF1-D Restoration 14+20 to 18+20 416 400 1.0:1 400
FF1-D Restoration 18+56 to 21+54 331 298 1.0:1 298
FF1-D Restoration 22+27 to 27+77 558 550 1.0:1 550
FF5-A Enhancement III(7.5) 0+65 to 16+75 1,610 1,610 7.5:1 215
FF5-B Restoration 17+59 to 18+14 45 55 1.0:1 55
Total 9,186 9,944 5,120
Credit Loss in Required Buffer* -430
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer* 312
Total Adjusted SMUs 5,002
*SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- "Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator",supplied
to Providers in the January 2018,from the USACE.A detailed description of the methodology and calculations is
described below and in Figure(s)11.
6.6 Credit Calculations for Non-Standard Buffer Widths
Buffer measurements for additional credit were made horizontally, beginning from the edge of the
wetted perimeter and extending to easement boundary.Due to the minimum required widths,additional
credit was not generated until a stream is at least 50 feet inside the edge of the buffer.Table 15 describes
the adjustments in stream credit based on buffer widths.Areas within the project that are being used to
generate additional credit are solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and will
not be used for the generation of any other credit type (i.e., the same square foot of buffer cannot be
used to generate wetland credit,nutrient offset credits or state buffer credits).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 38 November 2020

Table 15. Stream Mitigation Credit Adjustments for Non-standard Buffer Widths
Mountain Counties Piedmont and Coastal Plain Counties
Adjustment to Adjustment to Stream
Buffer Width Buffer Width
Stream Credit Credit
Less than 15 feet -100% Less than 15 feet -100%
15 to<20 feet -50% 15 to<20 feet -50%
20 to<25 feet -30% 20 to<25 feet -40%
25 to<30 feet -15% 25 to<30 feet -30%
30 to<50 feet 0% 30 to<35 feet -20%
50to<75feet 9% 35to<40feet -15%
75 to< 100 feet 16% 40 to<45 feet -10%
100 to< 125 feet 22% 45 to<50 feet -5%
125to< 150feet 27% 50to<75feet 0%
150 feet or Greater 30% 75 to< 100 feet 7%
100 to<125 feet 12%
125 to< 150 feet 16%
150 feet or greater 20%
In order to calculate credit adjustments,the Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator from
the USACE in January 2018 was utilized. To perform this calculation GIS analysis was performed to
determine the area (in square feet) of ideal buffer zones and actual buffer zones around all streams
within the project. Minimum standard buffer widths are measured from the top of bank (50 feet in
Piedmont and Coastal Plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties) and do not generate additional
credit. The ideal buffers are the maximum potential size (in square feet)of each buffer zone measured
around all creditable stream reaches,calculated using GIS,including areas outside of the easement.The
actual buffer is the square feet in each buffer zone,as measured by GIS,excluding non-forested areas,
all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas
failing to meet the vegetation performance standard,etc.Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer
width, so areas within the easement that are more than 150 feet from creditable streams should were
not included in this measurement.Non-creditable stream reaches within the easement are removed prior
to calculating this area with GIS (for both ideal and actual). The stream lengths,mitigation type,ideal
buffer, and actual buffer are all entered into the calculator. This is data is processed, and the resulting
credit amounts are totaled for the whole project(Table 14,Figure 11,Appendix B).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 39 November 2020

7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The success criteria for the Project will follow accepted and approved success criteria presented in the
2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and
subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Bankfull Events
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years.Otherwise,the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.Crest gauges will be installed FF1-B,FF1-D and FF4-
B (Figure 12).
Cross Sections
There should be little change in as-built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition(for example down-
cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks,or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall
be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.Bank height ratio
shall not exceed 1.2,and the Entrenchment Ratio (ER) shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle
cross-sections on a given reach. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four
bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring period(Table 16).
Digital Image Stations
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation,bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project
will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 trees per acre
with an average height of seven feet at the end of Year 5,and the final vegetative success criteria will
be 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be
counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports,but will not be counted
towards the success criteria of total planted stems.Moreover,any single species can only account for
up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of
50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success.
Supplemental planting transects will follow the same success criteria except the height requirement
and stems per acre will be total stems and not just planted stems.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 40 November 2020

8 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the NCIRT monitoring template. The monitoring report
shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding project close-out. Monitoring reports will
be prepared annually and submitted to the USACE. Monitoring of the Project will adhere to metrics
and performance standards established by the USACE's April 2003 Wilmington District Stream
Mitigation Guidelines and the NC IRT's October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update. Table 16 outlines the links between project goals, objectives, and
treatments and their associated monitoring metrics and performance standards within the context of
functional uplift based on the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework. The monitoring plan is provided
in Figure 12.
8.1 As-Built Survey
An as-built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel size,condition, and
location.The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg,water surface,bankfull,and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by USACE. Stream channel stationing will be marked with stakes
placed near the top of bank every 200 feet.
8.2 Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals.The visual assessments will include vegetation density,vigor,invasive species,
and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete
streamwalk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to
record each monitoring event,as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern.Results of visual
monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital
images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
8.3 Hydrology Events
Crest gauges will be installed to document the occurrence of bankfull events.A minimum of one gauge
will be installed on each tributary that is greater than 1,000 feet in length,with one gauge required for
every 5,000 feet of length on each tributary and a maximum of five gauges per tributary. Reaches with
Priority 1 Restoration (designed to reconnect the stream to its floodplain), gauges will be capable of
tracking the frequency and duration of overbank events. Where restoration or enhancement activities
are proposed for intermittent streams,monitoring gauges should be installed to track the frequency and
duration of stream flow events.
8.4 Cross Sections
Permanent cross sections will be installed at a minimum of one per 20 bankfull widths with half in
pools and half in riffle on all Restoration and Enhancement I reaches. All cross-section measurements
will include bank height ratio and entrenchment ratio. Cross sections will be monitored in Years 1, 2,
3,5,and 7.There should be little change in as-built cross sections.If changes do take place,they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent movement toward a less stable condition(for example down-
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 41 November 2020

cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes,deposition along the banks,or decrease in width/depth ratio).
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. There will be 20 plots within the planted area(24.76 acres). Plots will be a
mixture of fixed and random plots,with 13 fixed plots and seven random plots. Planted area indicates
all area in the easement that will be planted with trees. Existing wooded areas,including supplemental
planting areas are not included in the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in
the fixed plots: species,height,planting date(or volunteer),and grid location.For random plots,species
and height will be recorded for all planted woody stems.The location(GPS coordinates and orientation)
of the random plots will be identified in the annual monitoring reports. Random transects (50 meters
by 2 meters) will occur in the supplemental planting areas (roughly seven acres). There will be two
transects on Reach FF1-B and two transects on Reach FF5 for a total of four transects. To measure
these transects, a 50-meter tape is stretched diagonally across the buffer corridor and any native
volunteer or planted tree/shrub that falls within one meter of either side of the tape is recorded. The
transects will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Vegetation will be planted,and plots established at least 180 days prior to the initiation of the first year
of monitoring.Monitoring will occur in Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 between July 1st and leaf drop.Invasive
and noxious species will be monitored and so that none become dominant or alter the desired
community structure of the Project(Appendix G). If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific
treatment plan.
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting
A baseline monitoring report and as-built drawings documenting stream restoration activities will be
developed within 60 days of the planting completion on the Project. The report will include all
information required by IRT mitigation plan guidelines, including elevations, photographs and
sampling plot locations,gauge locations,and a description of initial species composition by community
type. The report will also include a list of the species planted and the associated densities. Baseline
vegetation monitoring will include species,height,date of planting,and grid location of each stem.The
baseline report will follow USACE guidelines.
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation.The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final
success criteria are achieved,whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to the IRT.
The monitoring reports will include all information and be in the format required by USACE.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan 42 November 2020

Table 16.Monitoring Requirements
Level Goal Treatment Outcome Monitoring Metric Performance Standard
. To transport Improve the
water from the Convert land-use of transport of water
o
1 watershed to Project reaches from from the watershed
the channel in a pasture to riparian to the Project NA NA
non-erosive forest reaches in a non-
manner erosive way
Reduce bank height Improve flood Crest gauges and/or Four bankfull events occurring in
ratios and increase bank connectivity pressure transducers: separate years
c. To transport entrenchment ratios by reducing bank Inspected semiannually
water in a byreconstructingheight ratios and
2 stable non-
channels g Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
channels to mimic increase Cross sections: Surveyed 1.4 within restored reaches
erosive manner reference reach entrenchment in
conditions ratios years 1,2,3,5 and 7 Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2
1
As-built stream profile NA
Reduce erosion
Establish a riparian rates and channel Cross sections: Surveyed Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
buffer to reduce
erosion and sediment stability to
reference reach 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections
on a given create a iniven reach where C channels are
o diverse years 1,2,3,5 and 7
bedform transport into project conditions proposed
3 streams.Establish Improve bedform Visual monitoring Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2
o stable banks with
Z To achieve diversity(pool
o livestakes,erosion Visual monitoring: Identify and document significant
C. dynamic control matting,and spacing,percent Performed at least stream problem areas;i.e.erosion,
equilibrium other in stream riffles,etc. semiannually degradation,aggradation,etc.
structures. Increase buffer Vegetation plots: MY 1-3:320 trees/acre
width to 50 feet Surveyed in MY 5:260 trees/acre(7 ft.tall)
years 1,2,3,5 and 7 MY 7:210 trees/acre(10 ft.tall)
To achieve Vegetation plots:
appropriate Improve stream Surveyed in MY 1-3:320 trees/acre
levels for water temperature years 1,2,3,5 and 7 MY 5:260 trees/acre(7 ft.tall)
temperature, regulation through (indirect measurement) MY 7:210 trees/acre(10 ft.tall)
dissolved introduction of
`c' oxygen Exclude livestock canopy
Z from riparian areas
4 m concentration,
with exclusion fence, Decrease nutrient Visual assessment of
u and other and plant a riparianloading othroughestablished fencingand
.� important bufferp filtration of planted conservation signage: Inspect fencing and signage.Identify
-o nutrients riparian buffer,and Performed at least and document any damaged or missing
including but removing livestock semiannually fencing and/or signs
not limited to from the riparian (indirect measurement)
Nitrogen and areas
Phosphorus
R
To achieve Improve aquatic
functionality in habitat through the
Plant a riparian installation of Visual monitoring of in-
levels 1-4 to Identify and document significant
buffer,install habitat habitat features, stream habitat features:
5 o support the life features,and construction of Performed at least stream problem areas;i.e.degradation,
o histories of aggradation,stressed or failed
construct pools of pools at varying semiannually
aquatic and structures,etc.
varying depths depths,and (indirect measurement)plants
and animals planting the
riparian buffer
°These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
43

9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of Project construction, RES will implement the post-construction monitoring
protocols previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as described
previously in this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring, it is determined that the
Project's ability to achieve performance standards are jeopardized,RES will notify the USACE of the
need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action. Once the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized
RES will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the USACE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Prepare Corrective Action Plan for review and approval by IRT.
5. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
Provide the IRT a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the extent and
nature of the work performed.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
44

10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval of the Project by the IRT, the Project will be transferred to Unique Places to Save
(UP2S):
Unique Places to Save
[phone]
PO Box 1183
Chapel Hill,NC 27514
[e-mail]
UP2S will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the
Conservation Easement or the deed restriction document(s)are upheld.Easements will be stewarded in
general accordance with the guidelines published by the National Land Trust Alliance. Specific
responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to the site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly
communicated to the landowner.
A model conservation easement and engagement letter from UP2S are included in Appendix C. The
engagement letter includes itemized annual cost accounting of long-term management,total amount of
funding,and the manner in which the funding will be provided.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
45

11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved mitigation
plan of the site.Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise
provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for
construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules
below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released
depending on the specifics of the case.Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended,depending
on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of Project
credits will be subject to the criteria described in Table 17.
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits,as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the IRT
with written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
f) Issuance of the 404-permit verification for construction of the site,if required.
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
The second credit release will occur after the completion of implementation of the Mitigation Plan and
IRT approval of the Baseline Monitoring Report and As-built Survey. All subsequent credit releases
must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a determination that required
performance standards have been achieved. As projects approach milestones associated with credit
release, the Sponsor will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur.This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
46

Table 17. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Release Credit Release Activity Interim Total Released
Milestone Release
1 Site Establishment(includes all required criteria 15% 15%
stated above)
2 Baseline Monitoring Report and As-built Survey 15% 30%
3 First year monitoring report demonstrates 10% 40%
performance standards are being met.
4 Second year monitoring report demonstrates 10% 50%
performance standards are being met.
5 Third year monitoring report demonstrates 10% 60%
performance standards are being met.
6 Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates 5% 65%
performance standards are being met. (75%**)
7 Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates 10% 75%
performance standards are being met. (85%**)
8 Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates 5% 80%
performance standards are being met. (90%**)
9 Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates 90%
performance standards are being met,and project 10% (100%**)
has received close-out approval.
**10%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
47

12 MAINTENANCE PLAN
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection will be conducted a minimum
of once per year throughout the post construction monitoring period until performance standards are
met.These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction
and may include the following:
Table 18.Maintenance Plan
Component/Feature Maintenance through project close-out
Stream Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of
in-stream structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and
supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the
channel.Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel
may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head-cutting.
Stream maintenance activities will be documented and reported in annual
monitoring reports. Stream maintenance will continue through the
monitoring period.
Vegetation Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic
invasive plant species shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical
methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be
performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture(NCDA)rules
and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be documented and
reported in annual monitoring reports.Vegetation maintenance will continue
through the monitoring period.
Site Boundary Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction
between the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries will be
marked with signs identifying the property as a mitigation site and will
include the name of the long-term steward and a contact number.Boundaries
may be identified by fence,marker,bollard,post,tree-blazing,or other means
as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary
markers disturbed,damaged,or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as-needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Road Crossing Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Conservation Easement or existing easement,deed restrictions,rights of way,
or corridor agreements. Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility
of the landowner to maintain.
Livestock Fencing Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits.Maintenance
of fencing is the responsibility of the landowner.
Beaver Routine site visits and monitoring will be used to determine if beaver
management is needed.If beaver activity poses a threat to project stability or
vegetative success, RES will trap beavers and remove impoundments as
needed. All beaver management activities will be documented and included
in annual monitoring reports. Beaver monitoring and management will
continue through the monitoring period.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
48

13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
CONFIDENTIAL
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of a $681,000 Construction Performance
Bond to the USACE to assure completion of mitigation construction and planting. Construction and
planting costs are estimated to be at or below$681,000 based on the Engineer's construction materials
estimate and recent bid tabulation unit costs for construction materials. Following completion of
construction and planting the Construction Performance Bond will be retired and a $153,095
Monitoring Performance Bond will be provided to assure completion of seven years of monitoring and
reporting,and any remedial work required during the monitoring period.The$153,095 amount includes
contingency and estimated monitoring costs from the Engineer. The Monitoring Performance Bond
will be reduced by $21,871 following approval of each annual monitoring report. The Monitoring
Performance Bond will be retired in total following official notice of site close-out from the IRT.
Financial assurances shall be payable to a standby trust or other designee at the direction of the obligee.
Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank
Sponsor are not acceptable. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE
receives notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation. The Performance
Bonds will be provided by a surety listed with the U.S. Treasury and has an A.M. Best Rating of B or
above. All Performance Bonds will be submitted to the USACE in draft form for approval prior to
execution. In the event of Sponsor default,UP2S has agreed to receive the funds and ensure the work
is successfully completed.
Table 19. Financial Assurances
Construction Cosil
ts
General(e.g.mobilization, erosion control,etc.) $100,000
Sitework $300,000
Structures(e.g.ditch plugs,logs,rocks,coir,etc.) $110,000
Crossings $100,000
Vegetation $75,000
Miscellaneous/Admin Fees $300,000
Total $985,000
Monitorin. Costs
Monitoring Set-Up&As-Built $22,500
Monitoring Year 1 and Report $12,000
Monitoring Year 2 and Report $12,000
Monitoring Year 3 and Report $12,000
Monitoring Year 4 and Report $9,000
Monitoring Year 5 and Report $13,500
Monitoring Year 6 and Report $9,000
Monitoring Year 7 and Report $18,000
Equipment(e.g. gauges,markers,etc.) $12,350
Maintenance $50,000
Total $170,350
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
49

14 REFERENCES
Dalrymple,T. 1960.Flood Frequency Analyses.U.S.Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1543-
A.
Doll,B.A.,D.E. Wise-Frederick,C.M.Buckner, S.D. Wilkerson,W.A.Harman,R.E. Smith and J.
Spooner. 2002.Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the
Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of the American water Resource Association. 38(3):641-
651.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1.U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Harman,W.H.et al. 1999.Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited By: D.S. Olsen and J.P.
Potyondy.AWRA Summer Symposium.Bozeman,MT.
Harman,W.,R. Starr,M. Carter,K. Tweedy,M. Clemmons,K. Suggs,C.Miller.2012.A Function-
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects.US Environmental
Protection Agency,Office of Wetlands,Oceans,and Watersheds,Washington,DC EPA 843-
K-12-006.
Johnson PA. 2006.Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions.U.S.
Depailnient of Transportation.Federal Highway Administration. Report Number FHWA-
HRT-05-072.
Johnston County K-State Research and Extension.2015. Selecting Juglone-Tolerant Plants.
Lotspeich,R.R.,2009,Regional curves of bankfull channel geometry for non-urban streams in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province,Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2009-5206, 51 p.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985,Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina
Geological Survey,General Geologic Map,scale 1:500000.
North Carolina Environmental Quality.North Carolina Dam Safety Program;N.C. Dam Inventory.
March 16,2017.https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-
mineral-land-permits/dam-safety(July 2018).
NCDENR 2012a. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina."Water
Quality http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home.(June 2018).
NCDENR 2012b. "2012 North Carolina 303(d)Lists-Category 5."Water Quality Section.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home. (June 2018).
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater
Classifications in North Carolina. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/
get file?p_1_id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed June 2018.
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
50

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program(NCEEP). "Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009.".
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998). A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Radford,A.E.,H.E.Ahles and F.R.Bell. 1968.Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press,Chapel Hill,North Carolina.
Rosgen,D.(1996),Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition,Wildland Hydrology,Pagosa Springs,CO
Schafale,M.P.and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina,Fourth
Approximation.North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR,Raleigh,NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE),2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2,
December 24,2002.
USACE. 2016.National Inventory of Dams.http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:12 Accessed
July 2018.
USACE. 2003.April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region(Version 2.0),ed. J. S. Wakeley,R.W. Lichvar,and
C.V.Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20.Vicksburg,MS: U.S.Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
USACE. 2018. Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator.
USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS).
1986.Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55.
USDA NRCS. 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook(NEH 654),USDA
USDANRCS. 2007.Soil Survey of Yadkin County,North Carolina.
USDA NRCS. 2010.Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States,Version 7.0. L.M.Vasilas,
G.W.Hurt,and C.V.Noble (eds.).USDA,NRCS,in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
USDA NRCS. Web Soil Survey;http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov(June 2018).
United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). 1999.EPA Manual. Quantifying Physical
Habitat in Wadeable Streams.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service."Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina."
North Carolina Ecological Services. http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/.(September 2014).
Green Mesa Mitigation Plan November 2020
51

Figures List
Figure 1 — Service Area and Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —USGS Map
Figure 3 —Landowner Map
Figure 4—Land-use Map
Figure 5 —Existing Conditions Map
Figure 6 —National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 7 — Soils Map
Figure 8 —Historic Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 9 —FEMA Map
Figure 10 — Concept Plan Map
Figure 11 —Non-Standard Buffer Zones
Figure 12 —Monitoring Plan

0
a„ °' ° v Condit}Rd
ipO, h,°/Y3 Qv' N a Er
i
r 3 '
rc
CI
_NCig6/ Sonnet Dr
c Spring St
ri
g U
° J Sunrise Ln
V U Q R
2 c rn
oonv
i
barn Sr
ea°J,,)11 r1 - y O Mai ^os S
0 o Q:
e 1 `
S,ce 'v
Arbor St B 2Y
LI
Y J V
e U \\ �s St
\ Dr
Marview Or `Oa
m
Dowers Le CO --
Q
O
o''
S.-
c
N
2
s
£
c
kts 0
d
0
v
0,,,, c9f:ta
9
q
.. Moxley Rd
Oo
a'
L n 1::::14% ‘
eo
[`
.7 a 0Q
'PbelI Rd
O
5 n°o /6a
ge C v
bP cy V
R w
a
.
o N Oak Ridge Ch°r°h Rd
0
f
nJ 5
- _-
3
Win sto -a
! 01 40
▪ Legend Lenoir
tit sville
Proposed Easement Morganton
- - - Green Mesa Salisbury
o Service Area 03040101 Site
U
14-Digit HUC-03040101130010
Mooresville
jseePy\;, 1 i
f 4.
N
Date: 10/7/2020
E.
Figure 1 -Service Area and Vicinity Map
▪ f�d�,: �kti�>�11 w c Drawn by: MDE
+6Tr-"�..:0�;�$ S Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
�eior 0 1,000 2,000 Checked by: MGB
11 Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=2,000 feet
Feet

__..t. -___4,•,,Q0. r. v.--,,,,v1 __ ..•,;,. ..) (c7-- , , , _ _, " - . , `7- ‘ " I. : .../. \ (
a , ,--... 0 . 4 4 ...",- ,. •% 4:3 Ii,.<;.....„ --- ,. .. \ „ .
)1. - ,
; iii____ 7: ) iii__.
e . . ,
, , .,•. tr
-. . -- 4-- • . ._ 5,.--1-11: .
,,\,•\I
),li„'''.
'_i'
1.
nI,
J 8 n `ry 9 pr { _ rfLj[1i
f ,p . 4.,...,..7pyeii iy
i, vr,v_o
_, •i
f•lc
.,ry„,,?/
,',i,,..•il o'... •-•\,v.f ;.-.-L-7P.
.,::-..,,,.)..
P(
.sm.,c1..r6p.,i,..-S•,r,,-•__
•
• .. --tea o / ..z1 14
if,
N:..../
. ,,.,
4l,,: N. ' ik1i. 14
; i'
02
k
'i -----.• ---"--3 ' t.,..,=\. ri '44 . ofP) \-45, -_1 1\ .-.\ ---c ' ... liti(. ._. ---u_.
• A ---' -'-----" —
---- ,.j.\. ,,, 4i-k _•4 ./ \-J 110°i`ft dPr:
�-- , y
$:`- • r~—' r 242 ac 4 , •
, : %r\,
FA
• -yip • __--..•, — - —_J __ _ _ 6 \ . %`. f ..
i,... ,,\,,
e .
,;-: -'=f, ) ,'.:• P13 l''.1.. =-r . .----...." ...-•-•.:) 1 . 7.41iiii.". FF1
1011ac - - \ kw
�i l� ,i 4�+ u \� , FF5
�sro I \•- _ .- -.,, 35 ac - ,
look
FF3
• - — moo ' 72 ac► ) 14•r�
1 \ -.• �,. • ' FF2 (C '
_ 2 .� y
�� ' F. �< 63 ac
-0......--._ 1;1; ° 1
_.:i• - , • Z
� n 6 _ „:„...„,.... 1 ;.�
II
I
. r t1,-.*
'(-- -,52\7,%
(,_,..,--4
______. ----cp ,‘.. (
_ ,
• , _ ate -.3,,
�' =t,
)\ t ./..--.€-
........ .. 0,-— r41111 ,.....,._. ._c, ,,,,, .. „.._,.,,,r �. ° i►))(-:- - . % 1 - ••••!,, r
.,
U ` `�/ •/\
.1I,Lp'
___ , Are ' .
I. 1 .,.. . (___
Legend •�
lli. '
o Proposed Easement M.,:„ k,... ..,1
lir * illSi.'-'' ♦'�� ,,
Drainage Area -"�"' _+ •I''
�'. + ! R ' •
r� __ �h e� � a�
Figure 2-USGS Map Date: 10/7/2020
�* 7 Yadkinville(1967)
0
.74271
� �71 di ��f�r��� w - ::ebyM:
res
S Green Mesa Mitigation Site
�"�� 0 1,000 2,000
11
Feet
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=2,000 feet

It
111411111 1
r. i'' ,,,„ '..°- RI e I at 1111 11111
pt t,.„, I I I I I I I 1 imr
r`
b
s i
1 A
1
/----' ,,,,i4P.7. Ar'..'4,
,ru
lI
FRAZIER FARM OF , A
NORTH CAROLINA LLC
499000223660 4S- APP
`C
FRAZIER FARM OF
S litiP i NORTH CAROLINA LLC
FRAZIER FARM OF / • 499000310877":3 `
NORTH CA �
ROLINA'LLC
l FRAZIER FARM OF -�.: `' y,
499000117958 h' / �.
i i NORTH CAROLINA LLC " ' Y"
499000217656
FRAZIER FARM OF
NORTH CAROLINA'LLC
499000403703 ,fti}
• Johnson`Joey C and Frazier
• Wilma A leneLTrustee;
499000200499
T ,
r°t
1
i.
`3
y
,= T^ ` Ytl S�
m 4
R
LegendBir -, � gill
Proposed Easement ' j
' =i13T 5:.
±.."'" WiN�QekaRl® :°_ ' ..
Project ParcelRFillf . _ ��� ,
i
N
Date: 11/5/2020
Figure 3-Landowner Map
‘...,
0 f��� ��.,��� w - c Drawn by: MDE
+'� 'r`.$.:i�;'`$ 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
+mow Checked by: MGB
�"�' 0 500 1.000
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet
Feet

_ —
I y
'or i,r
A - tit 3'�x 'Sol
m �
�1yr"i
-..-1, I ;ir .,a,11,,J0 , . , -°- - - ' ,_ , - "17 -4.. .''." 41-,--',.- :r— :,,Ifir.,,,,,.
i ./ pis G i,`
�aM. 1S ' F .,
' POP/in Df / d
a
00
" .. -aN Etr 't
ITS
' eillir#11 ' s'' ::4 'lk .,,,
" . - ' rid ''-: ,''' :ir_&,..t..,,,
}t
,, .., ... , 0 ,„,.,... fir „,.. .
,1/4
t ; ,,,,,„,. .1.,.!
. ..,.
. , •• - , P r:... .
A. �•-
J.
aW O.'+',Mom. I "'
ti ,• N..
i ,..,,
.4 _,
1'"' i
Carr
,. 4 i ' , 44.101.001,,,,_
4 4 .,„ . . _
. ,
,,:::, ,,,, artiNi "' "="-°''
w;' of
aN r ',r`1 c, 9
y .e a
,CrLiS
a.
o Rd a 2- A r _ .1 , '. sus Y
Legend � � � �
Proposed Easement . _,L ,lipti‘o,4 ""*'... f '' -
Drainage Area :�..4i, >_ r k
Land Use . t.. 3 r t s
Agriculture fi j
,
% t
Forest 1
Residential
Imperviuos Surface ' ti
Nsz
Open Water ff
t'
111411
Urban Commercial s�-
N
Date: 10/7/2020
Figure 4-Land Use Map
f��� ��•fr�>�� w - c Drawn by: MDE
+'� '�`�$.:i�;'`$ s Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
� el 0 1,000 2,000 Checked by: MGB
11
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=2,000 feet
Feet

aw ,w
f i ,.
A
''''' 44/::'' '-- :''.' . ',, ._ .‘ . . '''''' ' '‘‘'\ //6*;34P:' ''' 'L. ,,
1/
I.,'. . ,, -
fix
j
Historic Crossing
- - ,.- ' /7\'.''„. 1- ,, ., .„_. ' ,
t B aca
j
, ' . r ;',,,
,,, ,,,,,,.,,,,,
r i'.-';i''..'4•ii,4, . _ .
\ ,
: 1
As
Legend
Proposed Easement
Project Parcels
Parcels „-.
Existing Wetlands
ff
T T Transmission Line .„
Existing Streams
JIIC:i
. _
N
Date: 11/5/2020
Figure 5-Existing Conditions Map
Pfik� 17�,•:.4 w — c Drawn by: MDE res
tkoraNk fr.111,1`$ s Green Mesa Mitigation Site Checked by: MGB
e"�e 0 250 500
11 Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet
Feet

r PFO1A
t.-,, ‘,,,
M
q k
`,� t ,f 4 r# }� O 1
k,,, ',:*,,"-.:,. .,'.-:AI,'':',411'':
•
a ce•.. tq :re:.. }
—1111_ _ } z�
�" . _, . , , , k\ --
,,' •:.` Baptist Churchand 'r' � a,4" -
',1 x
40.
# % it''ya' a` -s tea. ,
ram.•c ;t t
, n
r
- i PUBHh �'a
E.,
..
L I .r i f
v bW 4'
� s Gaggi. 4h A \b 1 . R
1.
i
a V
t
- - , 1 L
..
, .
..
`g;
1
Legend .
.:,,, trvlV,
79- Proposed Easement ..
NW Wetlands 10/29/2018 yr.
N
Date: 10/7/2020
,L.
Figure 6-National Wetland Inventory
-iin
f��� ��•���� WE Drawn by: GDS
+'� 'r`�$.:i�;'`$ 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
��"�� 0 250 500 Checked by: MDE
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet
g.
Feet

FaD
FdD2 \ ea \) / \/° HsA+ CcC2
Cla
FdD2 ^N i': ' FdE2 CcC2 lan
_� ` '' FeD3
____&DM
- -2
DeA FgE2 \ �i' Vie.". �'HsA __ .._ 411Dr
FaE
CaC
FeE3 GOP �__/ FdD2
FgD2
efe*
Baptist ChurcFi fttl —
r
YZi/
\___...---v Mill CM CrA FeD3
FdE2 FgD2
FeD3
` --
) t ' ,
RdF aSi
SmD
/ FdD2 \ Saiffl
CO . \----__ &Et \
QS FgE2
QM \
Gin '.......\ 1::;/
CgC2
CaC
CgB2
NaB 7
12 __...\-----,.....
Map Unit I
611
Symbol Map Unit Name
CcB2 Ce63 CcC2 Clifford sandy clay loam,6 to 10 percent slopes,moderately eroded
Legend CrA Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded
•
- DeA Dan River sandy loam,0 to 3 percent slopes,frequently flooded
FdD2 Fairview sandy clay loam,10 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded
Proposed Easement •
FdE2 Fairview sandy clay loam,15 to 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded
Hydric (100%) FeD3 Fairview clay loam,10 to 15 percent slopes,severely eroded
FeE3 Fairview clay loam,15 to 25 percent slopes,severely eroded
Predominantly Hydric (66-99%) FgD2 Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam,10to15percentslopes,moderatelyeroded
FgE2 Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam,15 to 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded
L Partially Hydric (33 65%) ' FtF Fairview-Stott Knob complex,25 to 45 percent slopes,stony
.
o HsA Hatboro soils,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequentlyflooded
1 In Predominantly Nonhydric (1-32%) • •
RdF Rhodhiss-Stott Knob complex,25 to 45 percent slopes,stony
Nonhydric (0%) SmE Siloam sandy loam,15 to 25 percent slopes .
" SmF Siloam sandy loam,25 to 50 percent slopes
N .,
Date: 10/7/2020
Figure 7-Soils Map
„.,.
f���N LI II O gclai w c Drawn by: MDE
- -+'Alr-"�..:*ivy_ � 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site or.,,icks
*ivy_
0 250 500 Checked by: MGB
11 Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet
Feet

1950 rtx .' . 1963
ter,
• p$,-f
i.,.7,:,.,, ..,;':,,,..:,,,'it.,,,:,_
ir. ,, _ ,,,,„..„..„,.,,,,,., . ..
,,,,,,,,..... ., . c.- 7.1,
..„,,
-----....,, . , .
q:,..
55
. ...„ ,,... . ,..t . ,... ., ..... .,
• ..
, , . .„... ......
•
_ . .
. . , _
„, ,
, . „
..,. ..,,,.. ,.. ..,
. .,,.},..,...„,„:.,,,,,,...,„:„.„,„ ......,. .,.
, ,
..,..,,,,..:,.,,...„.„Ac ;::;.--4- ..., -,,. ,..... ,„ , I
,. .. ,
' c r
6 r
t -
:,: .11kiAT;,...''.4,-;. .• o w0..."''',-:- - , '', . : '' .'4 -- „, ",. " pc47'4,1/2:‘,.PA, t
t g u
i I, t __ ....sf, . Ai. ,.
p ER a �i ,.
, Source: ,.USGS Earth Explorera Source:USGS Earth Explorer .
1 ,
rr 1976 1993
1#
y.
ti
.b ' --11''''''4
u w. r .
r.
., a , .,
. , , . .'i,..,',...:5,?4,-.-,....,:' 41k, -,,v,„ ..
•
l 1
'L ?Mk.
{ -.y'E / ` Source:NCOneMap ,
, ,
ri.....,.,„ .
i . ..,,...:_.., . : .,. ,,,,.,, :
Legend
d
N o Source:USGS Earth Explorer � 1 Proposed Easement
of.;
N
Date: 10/7/2020
E.
Figure 8-Historic Aerial Imagery
y��*�i:".IU�1/1�#r. w E Drawn by: MDE
pr,,ems
+..,,,011101, 0 500 00o Green Mesa Mitigation Site Checked by: MGB
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet
Feet

•
t.1
/ .
S ,4-' €r -
44
is
•
; y�a�� '". k w E�. <44
���1
rik
{ i
;.;:,-141i6:7:: ''
'tr•' %,,t,
.��, �'a'` � `' tv' '+af-� - i
' - ? '' 'ilc' - , - ,.,. .. ..„
"
yam-
1 AREA OF MINI ALrFL®.D,HAZARD .4.
a . 6. Dnvers go .irrA. y,F as,�°u s~
pN
.b I h A`R' ,ry�" k p •,yam
tc.
"i` 'I `
•
,
PAN P' �
� J9
„ '
/104888008/200
•
Legend
o
s II Proposed Easement ,�
L..,_ FEMA Zone AE (None) ,
0 r•,0,.!k s
N
Figure 9-National Flood Hazard Layer Date: 10/21/2020
1.•.■.■■ i•a►L w E (FMA)
/44 Drawn by: MDE
•+t7
~, 4.t, ;#` �� 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site Checked by: JRM
1'�' 0 250 500
g.
Feet
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet

II I
fl\szir Ford Crossing Installation
;rim\ /FF1-D �•\
I . I .
) 1 •ie
•
Baptist..:Church_,Rd•
Ford Crossing Installation
Culvert Installation
J 1
j\----- 4114'j 4
At
S •
1
\,. ..i r 1. a
♦
• •
••
♦w
1
w••
,
t
s
«
Ford Crossing Improvement y
i -r/
I
Proposed
Reach Mitigation Type Length(ft) Mitigation Ratio SMUs
Legend FF1-A Enhancement II 993 2.5:1 397
FF1-B Enhancement III 219 5.0:1 44
Proposed Easement(36.15 ac+/-) FF1-B Restoration 1,267 1.0:1 1,267
Parcel BoundaryFF1-C Enhancement II(3) 560 3.0:1 187
FF2 Preservation 602 10.0:1 60
Approach FF3 Enhancement III(7.5) 1,179 7.5:1 157
FF3 Enhancement III(7.5) 650 7.5:1 87
Restoration FF3 Restoration 500 1.0:1 500
FF4-A Enhancement I 474 1.5:1 316
Enhancement I (1.5:1) FF4-B Restoration 444 1.0:1 444
Enhancement II (2.5:1) FF1-D Restoration 143 1.0:1 143
FF1-D Restoration 400 1.0:1 400
Enhancement III (3:1) FF1-D Restoration 298 1.0:1 298
FF1-D Restoration 550 1.0:1 550
` Enhancement III (5:1) t 4 FF5-A Enhancement III(7.5) 1,610 7.5:1 215
FF5-B Restoration 55 1.0:1 55
Enhancement III (7.5:1) = Total 9,944 5,120
_ Credit Loss in Required Buffer -430
gg Preservation Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 312
Adjusted SMUs 5,002
N Figure 10-Concept Design Date: 11/12/2020
f��i: �♦•���t W E Drawn by MDE
t�,,:..:..,i�;"`tj�1 Green MesaFS
��'k� 0 250 500 Mitigation Project Checked by: MGB
11 1 inch=500 feet
Feet Yadkin Count North Carolina

Ideal Buffers Actual Buffers C
pre IP
N
w E
11..11III l'il i,(40/PONMOIM*_..iih iiiiiiiii
0 250 500
Feet
Figure 11 -Non-Standard
Buff Zones
} Green er Mesa
Mitigation Site
�� Yadkin County, North Carolina
k
� - .4411.1".."\- 11J- ► � Date: 10/20/2020 Drawn by: MDE
---.11111 Aliwir/
` 1 j Checked by:MGB 1 in=500 feet
N _ t
Legend
IProposed Easement
j '7 Buffer Width Zones
t., \
0-50 ft
50-75 ft
76-100 ft
101-125 ft
- 126-150 ft
REFERENCE
1)Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z17N.
2)Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
ff North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

. ,, . Arne
sit'st:I°*. -, ,
reF
V* 4 4 w. le4.0414.1.4",k '''I'k‘ .'),'". "t,.,,'-..';•-...y,Ap
\N _--*
..o; •
•
♦ - (MVO.; ♦ ♦1 ♦♦ r_ .
♦F444-t.♦ 1 ♦ i ♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ /44♦ ♦
Nc• 1.. � FE4=6 �♦`I S
�.';.♦:♦.♦.♦♦♦. p '.�'` •♦r:.♦ 0 150 300
►♦�,.♦,ak :��.♦ Il
Feet
t.
I ��_����" ♦ 4♦ Figure 12-Monitoring Plan
;,.....��� ♦:.� Green Mesa
t♦`4' Mitigation Project
•
•�:� Yadkin County, North Carolina�.�
Gp t•♦♦♦♦1�♦4 1♦♦♦* ��t1�.
illi
vor ♦♦♦♦ ♦1 �1�wP
``'�♦ Date: 10/21/2020 Drawn by: MDE
♦♦♦♦ A.
� ♦ ��� �� Checked by:MGB 1 in=300 feet
•��4 w`w41!. ,t It, Legend
' ♦ �♦::♦♦♦��4 ••♦ vq4, ' � Proposed Easement
♦♦♦4
♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦� -•a*-1•♦♦: ♦: �.:.;�'` � Planted Area (24.76 ac)
1�1♦♦�♦1��1�1i �♦♦♦ � ♦♦♦r���♦1 Cross Section
♦♦. I♦.♦1♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦�♦�4 r���� 8.4 ® Crest Gauge
- ��00witramt. ♦♦�♦/0♦♦♦1 8, *
��♦��1♦��gitik1�;�♦v 14 .I. t` ■ Vegetation Plot
♦A.--— 1� pp
. . Approach
w1 1� ► Restoration
���_♦�,�� Enhancement I (1.5:1)
- . ice PL
N♦ Enhancement II (2.5:1)
�� ,'v&N Enhancement III (3:1)
•�- .74 — Enhancement III (5:1)
' 1 �•• - - Enhancement III (7.5:1)
1 Note:There will be a total of 20 vegetation plots; �► Preservation
= 13 fixed vegetation plots, and 9 will be randomly +
placed each monitoring year. -
•
r.
Random vegetation plots are not shown in this monitoring plan. 1 ► oaammosiowitrat
Random plot will vary by location and dimension. i Preservation
��it'1/�> o
ri
Crest gauge, cross section, and ��alb4 �1101
p vegetation plot locations are all proposed 4P4►
E
locations.

Appendix A - Plan Sheets

c 1 r
1 P
GREEN MESA STREAM MITIGATION SITE res
' Level Csoss
4,
0.
d
F
Str:ny Knoll
Br_nham YAD KI N COUNTY, NORTH CARO LI NA 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
£i Raleigh, NC 27612
Burch r • -
_ _ • Main: 919.829.9909
Elk rr www.res.us
Elkin GYP Rrd?n1ond Engineering Services Provided By:
Barmy •.
YAD KI N RIVER BASIN : H U C 03040101130010 Angler Environmental LLC
nd8 Anj*r.Cto License: F-1428
N OVE M B E R 2020 SEAL
Rena £.,�
J
PROJECT LOCATION
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
le Yadkinvi:le o�
.ii 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
s
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Hamptorw llr Some-s /S
C)ocsm;ds ' Sheet List Table
$ I Sheet Number Sheet Title
VICINITY MAP t ,
COVER
NTS r i v�. i��F ' --
I
I S 8 A I OVERALL AERIAL VIEW
� \'J
,. �c , REACH FFI D E I GENERAL NOTES S LEGEND
THE '
I °"� �� _ E2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
a.m.= oHE• �/'' ...
REACH FF4-A ��-,' !<•.oHE�
Z5. . lip
�, 1 ` 5 I REACH IT I -A
"'� '• — �� di
1 **,,,,..,,, /i/ -7tdra c,,E____e_t-,_ 4. g @� ��` _� 5 2 REACH FFI -A o N
�1• i
ry e; '` .+ -- 53 REACH FFI -A B o
RR
REACH FF4 B 54 RACH FfI -VREACH FFI C iI / I c14111ff ,\\<,,„\\_ 111141 g'y �• F 55 REACH FFI -B $ CI / ,r \ ,._,\..,, _ \ Z
_____
_ _ ____ ..,,, .,� 56 REACH FFI -C °
o f=��—� ° E - _., 57 REACH FFI D �
�one-f-won ,t__ 0.1;
1 /__ _ �4 ',��;� 58 REACH FFI D
fl
8w
CE _
/-� _ ., REACH FF5-A 59 REACH Ff I D
fl
Q Q y . , 4(kti REACH FF5 B aA 5 I 0 REACH FF2
II 4: 51 I REACH FF3-A o ct
Know what's below. REACH FFI -B `'> _ .., 6 o z
Call before you dig --W 5 12 REACH FF3-A z w —
REACH FFI AL ""�, 0Q 2
A
, REACH FF3 B 5 13 RACH FF3-Aw
cC diin
NOTICE TO CONTCTOR 5I S2 /k
_ 5 14 REACH FF3-A S B
11/4
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING, OR EXCAVATION THE a` LCE i wl,�\ ( �\
►
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND _ 53 —� y y y �y`-/ y �p� ��\ /� ��� 1k 5 15 REACH FF4-A
�7r-_
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH I
�` h -e1- `�_, ,4114 _ - ;�"��r�� C'° ° / F - '% _ / A
THE AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS 111
�. ~\ > _• /� `�^ y y '.- " 'Z ,�/ ' .y / ems+ / A_1 ' ' S I REACH FF4-B
OR NOT. CALL "8 I I " A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING OR / ` \ y;' ,��" ',e " CO�-- - y y y " y �`_ y y��y�1
EXCAVATING. REPAIRS TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM /� �C m ��_:-' �r� `may`- y y y y yZ.4140 y y JJ " 5 17 REACH FF5-A
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE - �1 y y ���y y y y � y y y y y y ti!� •
CONTRACTOR. __� -14 � 0 ' �� �7y y�y N
yyyy yyyyy • yyy .., 518 REACH FF5-A
•
yyyyyy y �' .\
S I S REACH FF5-A B
\ .
���ti �' ', W P I PLANTING PLAN
}� \ �' > ��� \ �z\r F I FARM IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
ROJ ECT DIRECTORY `. \\_._ REACH FF3 A
\ o ' , _�� �� _ D I DETAILS
DESIGNED BY: REACH FF2 ��� �, \ D2 DETAILS
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC �,w� - - \ A"•
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE I I 0 \ \ D3 DETAILS
RALEIGH, NC 27605 _ _ _ s4t,f,
`4' D4 DETAILS
SURVEYED BY:
- - -I `� c � / D5 DETAILS
ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC �; r
I I 6 WILLIAMS ROAD "s '
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
i
t
PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
CONDITIONS PLANIMETRICS SURVEY WAS , DESIGNED:DRAWN: MJG
TRS
PROVIDED BY ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC �J
I CHECKED: AFM
(NC FIRM LICENSE NUMBER C-4288, -
SITE MAP SHEET NUMBER:
CH RISTOPH ER L. COLE, NC PLS L-5008) - - - - - NTS
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-20I 7-0 1466
J \ I

f 1 r \
\ AREACHFFI -D row
0 res
RESTORATION
\ — - - 3600 100
_ Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
a
i ., _ _ _ Main: 919.829.9909
$- •
r. / i — C-F�
�F. _ _ _ www.res.us
_ -
�, \\ ' F / _— /, —___—— T- - - _:,. Engineering Services Provided By:
i # / —__/ ——— g9- 1 Angler Environmental, LLC
1
F \ C_ - -v_y- \ 1 License: F-1428
\ 7.4„.. - _— _-__ LG� AI �/' REACH FF5-B SEAL
/3� _ TB -a _ _ =,a_. Lac LSE
�j7 f �-- RESTORATION
L� I / 71/\ �a.`_ _ G� / i // / / l -_ 4D\ _
ii _._,
o' : i''''--- ,(1-; /i4 / •
REACH FF4-A I ,
\ -
ENHANCEMENT I \ g37 m cI REACH FF1 -C - - � ��\ \\\ <// ENHANCEMENT
REACH FF5-A •
o- --t---------------- +LF - ENHANCEMENT II' \ 1
III
i.
I \ c"\ . . . _ ._ ----,
I \ I
eagimmimmillLI \ I I - . .
i i I • \ %/
REACH FF4-B I t11 i - • \ � FULL SCALE: 1"=150
RESTORATION \ �,� 150 300
ti 1
4 ? \ \ \
\ 2" = FULL SCALE
I 1" = HALF SCALE
\ 1
\ , - ...
i \
4-'2'
_, \ LCE - ` vj Q N
r+
\ :
\ i 1allihr'� N
Ho
\\
_ \\ \
0>1
4 . 'et i_--
\\ ‘• \ 0
1111
I- \_ (/ \ \\ 0
Sr
0 V A \ z
/ > \\ \ l
\ ��
opei
REACH FF1 -B REA H FF3 /I-
/RESTORATION ,n�� RESTORATION , \
f - REACH FF1 -B /// O
•{ -0.00- A 7 . --.' ., _ .' ,..- --- err - �/ ( \ \ \ - ---- LL
ENHANCEMENT III \\ // � }
� t \\ (�
o rI
— / 1 R. o z
z
REACH FF1 -A / - - // l( ! _ w
J
ENHANCEMENT I lir. v� / � _ � ( _ ;
45
ro / /
//_ — i • n \
\ W
r—n Q
N \ \ V! Z
E LCE - LCE _— ) �C\� \�
; LG , ; / REACH FF3 z
0 , kir .,,h G� LGE ,- \ \ ENHANCEMENT III . .. . __ _ 0_ 0
u _ Green Mesa NI'itigatian Site Credits 0 �; NW .. Q Q
d Proposed Mitigation "��e
U W_
w Reach Nfitigation Type Length (LF} Ratio
SNP 3�` -P'\ ; - ~ I- J
u) FF1-A Enhancement II 993 1 : 2.5 397 �� i L F Q
FF1-B Enhancement III 219 1 : 5.0 44 , i \ Q Z W
o FF1-B Restoration 1,267 1 : 1.0 1,267 J
J
o FF1-C Enhancement II (3) 560 1 : 3.0 187 rn ' V~j H Q
FF2 Preservation 602 1 : 10.0 60 ��� ul O W
,,
°' FF3 Enhancement. III (7.5) 1,179 1 : 7.5 157 �0� W U
REACH FF2 W z w 0
cz FF3 Enhancement III (7.5) 650 1 : 7.5 87 PRESERVATION z Z IF
FF3 Restoration 500 1 : 1.0 500 •.. _, rn �J �� \� z W Q z
FF4-A Enhancement I 474 1 : 1.5 316 ., L— — - 2
U
cc Q
z cc 0 cc
FF4-B Restoration 111 1 : 1.0 414 0_ o
Q FF1-D Restoration 143 1 : 1.0 143 _ _ - PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
FF1-D Restoration 400 1 : 1.0 400 \ � )
0 �� PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
°
_ > DESIGNED: MJG
2 FFl-D Restoration 298 1 : 1.0 298 \, ,' DRAWN: TRS
FF1-D Restoration 550 1 : 1.0 550 • CHECKED: AFM
ii - - SHEET NUMBER:
aE FF5-A Enhancement III (7.5) 1,610 1 : 7.5 215 "`-
w ,
z FF5-B Restoration 55 1 : 1.0 55 Al
_ .
_,
E Total 9,944 5,120 ' - , - \
J ` J

c" 1 r 1
STREAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
LEGEND res
I . ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT CROSSINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
A DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLINE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR 50
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP.
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR 46 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
2. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM AT THE END PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 Raleigh, NC 27612
OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER. WITH APPROVAL, A PUMP AROUND MAY BE ALLOWED TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY IF THERE PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR 42) Main: 919.829.9909
IS NO FORECAST FOR RAIN OVERNIGHT, AND/OR THE PUMP APPARATUS IS MAINTAINED AND 'V W www.res.us
MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY. EXISTING WETLAND
4' W W Engineering Services Provided By:
3. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO --- Angler Environmental, LLC
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EXISTING STREAM License: F-1428
9i----
4. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WITHIN AREAS THAT ARE TO BE CUT 9" OR MORE BELOW EXISTING EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB SEAL
GRADE. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL IS TO BE PLACED ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN BENCHES. EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — BB
5. STRUCTURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS (AS INDICATED ON THE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE ONE ONE 0
STRUCTURE TABLES) USING METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL SHEETS. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING,
OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES. PROPERTY LINE — — — —
G. NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL SHALL BE TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL AND INSTALLED ON THE EXISTING FENCELINE —x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—
PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW/RIFFLE CHANNEL SECTIONS. IN AREAS WHERE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
NATIVE SUBSTRATE TO PLACE A MINIMUM 9" LAYER ALONG PROPOSED SHALLOW/RIFFLE SECTIONS, EXISTING TREELINE
SUPPLEMENT THE NATIVE SUBSTRATE USING SPECIFICATIONS CALLED OUT IN THE DETAIL SHEETS.
7. UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING, INSTALL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION INCLUDING EROSION EXISTING TREE0
CONTROL MATTING OR SOD MATS ALONG CHANNEL BANKS.
8. FILL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DIRECTION OF THE PROPOSED TOP OF BANK — —
ENGINEER.
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF CHANNEL —
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE LCE
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG X
(SEE DETAIL D3)
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
(SEE DETAIL D2)
iLi
I— o
• N
LOG SILL 0 N
(SEE DETAIL D2) I—• N
. J
II
OP
ROCK CROSS VANE lie }.
(SEE DETAIL D4) J
4Ib�' 0
'A.
� Z
• 1—
W
CONSTRUCTED BOULDER RIFFLE �' �' ��` 0_
�n fl
(SEE DETAIL D5) '' 0
• >-
O 11
LL Q
Z 0 Z
() W J
J W
w W Q_'
LOG J-HOOK CC CC 0_
(SEE DETAIL D7)
Illi W
a
LE U) Z_
r LOG CASCADE / \ Z —I
coDETAIL D7) O O 0
0 Z
Q Q W
I RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL / O O �O 0 ak
U W
H (SEE DETAIL D3) 0 Q O D 7Th04 H =
� . 0 . 0 06
O
u)
coc.iW
g LOG STRUCTURE < Z H
o (PROFILE) 8 r2 i_>-
0
Z
O Z -I
Q
L ROCK STRUCTURE < 0Et
(PROFILE) W 0 W
.45'7, Z
di w
J
co
a) Z Z 0 ~
wC
i�n < Z
92 0L.I_
U
z 0o
U
4)
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
cm PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
0
DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
0)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
di
Q El
z
w
J
L
J I

l 1 l \
\
0 res
\ I�EACh FF I —D
\ I�EACh FF I —E
\ _ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\ , Raleigh, NC 27612
\ /
Main: 919.829.9909
'S% _ /� �' is/' _ �\\ / \\\ \ �.� _ www.res.us
\ \ \ �/ / / / _ __ \ \ \ �_� / //// Engineering Services Provided By:
�+.' � - -----_ _ Angler Environmental, LLC
\ VA v��A CG kitviro
i ( � �`�<�'Z —�� i/ � ��A 1 } V V A ` acid / / \
\' vim . ���� v��vvv _ /�,, �. :r - —/\ i nE�4,, --'�° \ ., ---// / I , ,.° t1�^ - License: F 1428
\ Y', \`_\\\N.\�\\_ % / i. .�/i/ ' .s—��.�' wry .:., ,-t., \ \\ / \ne �1`'hJ"l:,`�o ____ SEAL
111 \\\\ �� \ .....
� :�' \\\ \\_ —/''� __ // ,� / �'—"� one t nc 3 J'' _ r �R�t ——�'—�� / 1I% I C� „t_
\\ 1 �► �� �.�.i���.64 - 1` ` __— MPce_�__� --e / f ih " or 'gone Sri-�� \ `_ >\. 7�� ^L � , �`_I /� /
\ \�\�\ I ..—\ \ \� , \-`---_ -' `a`=R �one�one�on $� / /// l 11 I —— \\ ` —�'2 _ r��_ il-1 'P1
�\ 1\ �� _` \ \ ,� done oaoa�RwT�oa — — � / _` —— -_ _
\ I \�� \a one - - _-- -/ - -�-_- _ —
.ne—[� � s I I
one sA �' ( mot' :- --� l di l�l i = — _— `^ �.`
once—once_ ��\^ :Rr'rxr" \ \\ `— �//�3/�7 / / /\ — = pp, '
men"`c� \ one ones g ue -- tom. -- _ , \_��`� - i�i/// 1 II // /�/r- >i—� \`
one ->
v A,,, L / � � - .� �, ��.III {IIRw�. 1/ Vv / /�� /�� (%ii —_--_ ^---ii% C.
\ \\\\k��� \ •; . - '_.. Fir IL Il\`' '\)I / ('I it /, /�'' — j—�'�ii�E '� \,
\ \ \ II 1 / ,//// I�EACh FF I —C
��> ,/ / `\ Illy II i ,,tip. �I1 I \ l� \11t\ I __ i -- s �\
\ / I l i l J I �I .. '��t 111,. ,�.l \\\\ \\l>>1\ _-------------------- onE � .�1onE_��
I�EACh FF4—A 3p, \ \\t, I, 1, 1 ck_ --- ------------- I�EACh FF5—A
I 1 �t \�
v i 3�\ \\
,,,,-------' ‘ *
% 'N%\\„:,...\...,:.Z;‘;;..,,,.\ 1 \ \ ,,
' I \�\\ \ �\ \ � �I It()� FULL SCALE: 1"=150
IKEACI-1 FF4—B , , \\\\\�\\ \\ �,�\ 1 1 r�, I�EACh FF5—B
\\ I \\ \ � \,\�� \I I I 1 11 �j,
\ u \VA\ VA :VA�� �\ I\lVI ►�ll
\ v v 1 1 II It llt�v 0 150 300
\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\�� \\�\ \ll
\ . .�, \\ l\\ ,\\\\\\\\\\\\\ . \I It I 1\�\\\\
\ I /� / I\\\\\�\l1\\\\\\\\\\\\'� 1�\\\\ \\\\\ � .\
c� 2" = FULL SCALE
` /_ \\ Itk\ \ \\\\\\\@1�\L 1t
�j�����\\\ �> \``. 1" - HALF SCALE
\ I \\ � 1 `
- ►-, \\\1\ III/l //// 11 t1� ? r1\\ \\ \�
i / 101i)))ii)V1in V/. // I; -���� ' i 1 v vvv \ \‘'
\ /,- \t\1 II/, ///�/,J,/ 1 \ Cj11//
I IIII/ �IIII /i� H N1IIIII1111 I � �� Ii11111�Ith I� 1 , �• k ►I�i 0_
j1 1 \ \ �J �R1 '\\\1.,IIIII
+ t111I1" ' <,
v t1tV\t\1110 y-,---- ''_I l ^__ 4)1 11 11 1 , $�' �`
\A\\\\\ \\ __ � ___ I \
'III ;I1rr III 1��j�'I�-w vim, c H
p R \ • \� ~
\. /N i \ \ ,
y� vvv v ;> e O
\\\\ ,1 1
"vim ,� A � ,
y 1
:4,/,
� -lro•
GE / �" � /may <`, — \ \\
`� (n 0 LL Z
W w
...Aild# =----=---:-/ < i / /.v--_-•.- ., • 0 ,
, F a._ w w
/ ‘.... \....,; ?......! , ,.....,— ...' -- ----------- ...4
(pc (_, All ) -; . " . <
��c � - '�` ; ' ' `� �� �� � � y, KEACI-1 FF3 z
r2 CI)
\ � -„ _ fce e Q Z
Lu -__ ,„�,� I 0
I—
O
i _ ace , _ .oi---------; \ �6 ��F
. i . / '.. \ 2 0 z
' 0
j,
I � .' rn - `_�= �CF \ LLI
v c
N • .
i E ,N \ w..,., I
j,„ I
I�EACh FF2 �� '' \ -- 2 w.,„ I .,
Li_ 1 �� > 2
'' '' \ \
(L)u) / \.. E N , t
\ rn �J> . �'� \\ U w < z
Lu
0 t \ :. o cc
U
\ PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
\ *' PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
_° \\ /'� DESIGNED: MJG
a
DRAWN: TRS
O. CHECKED: AFM
,f;
cc
wu) SHEET NUMBER:
__ 4) \
E 2
z< _____ -_ \
__-
_,
J

I -A
l \ r
i LCE
rn I LEE ENHANC M ENHANCEMENT II
r
Pres
)x
, STA I +54TO I I +47
L cE 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
n I Raleigh, NC 27612
-n I\ \ L cE Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
EXISTING FORD n \
CROSSING TO BE rn y L CE Engineering Services Provided By:
ENHANCED Angler Environmental, LLC
f _ 2-�-00
/ ' /GG — — —_ _ L C E SEAL License: F-1428
6 - � � -- '99 — TB
///�GG\'`\ _ _ — _ —99 — _- —TB _ 3-h00 , _ EXISTING STONE WALL LcE
/'�// � —� _ — e}8 �� -e9 �_ TB
TO REMAIN
�� —
\ ice_ � � TB _
O / ,� t BB 9g 4 O _
/\ O O
xV
\ '<;' /
// / j CA9i — \ Co
1.. - - 5+00 .4K/
\ /\
// ////45( ---, ---- ------___________________ 99 — _ — --LG6---_—— r-s \ '-)
w� e0j/ N\ \ \ <?�
\ �/ °/ // SPOT STABILIZATION OF CHANNEL FROM \�� \6� x
\00
x / j/ APPROXIMATE STA. I +54 TO 6+00. \\00
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
O EXACT LOCATIONS TO BE IDENTIFIED BY \ \ g \ 0 30 60
\ ► ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION \�A �7 O /
N ,\ " kO 2" = FULL SCALE
\\ \ / — _ 1" = HALF SCALE
\\ 'may
\ T \ � u.i
\ \\ � `B i �� �/il
x Q• o
O N
v 1.
0_
\ � I
n
J
Jo 7 z o
n
rn 0
\
z
1-
2
rI
w
a
rI
O
u_
965 ^ I 965 oc }
\ 0 rI
u_ Q
N vi a z
� _ _ — _ _ _ Z w
\ � �— \\ �� I ,� - - _ — EXISTING GRADE 0 Q
N y — — _ ALONG ETREAM 5 _1 W
N\ \\ _ _ _ CENTERL NE w w rI
\ / Q_
45 960 — 960
occ;) W
- - - _ _ _ ~ _....-
N,
— —
— \ �i \ OF BANK
✓ / \ z
co \\ // 11 \ O O
> \ / 1 r
\ / \ Q 0 U
955 \ // 1 \ 955 = Q
H _ _ � � � \\ / \ \
_ C
i
1 W
�� 1 �� z W
E 950 \� 950 < o
i z _ \� � �.45
—/ �� / ,
ro try \� I..IC.J
2 j + \� � � - - - - _ w G z_ w
\ � Z z 0 H
Z � � � I- in0
o - - - - - I- LnJ,J Q z
0 \ — , , O LL > Q
U O � ,
cc 0 cc
z 945 945 0 o
U
N
.O J
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
o) PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
0)
cc I SHEET NUMBER:
6
Q 0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 S
zin
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

r
Pres
REACH FF I -A
ENHANCEMENT II
STA I +54 TO I 1 +47
= L C = L — I C C J 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
C - L — L Raleigh, NC 27612
L C Main: 919.829.9909
C �C www.res.us
QQ L L Engineering Services Provided By:
X Angler Environmental, LLC
CD License: F-1428
CO � SEAL
v
`vi— \� REACH FF 1 -B
\'� �' �� �� �s ENHANCEMENT III
\\
\ STA 1 1 +47 TO 1 3+66
9� 5+00_ _9�- - - — to \ \ O —�
9g 91 / `•,s.. ) ) i O
-----:
- -/ �� �� �� 00 /ray Q0/ , ��_ -e I. O * / / 3 O. ��
/ --- _.-- 75— \\ / _1
) ............,
�._�TB i-i �� B� , =1_—.— �1 — /,/ ,-0y FULL SCALE: 1"=30
l '� 'c / 0 30 60
\� REACH FF2 }/ // / 02" = FULL SCALE
(SHEET S 1 0) }/ / y/ 1" = HALF SCALE
/ / � ZW
� Ed�� ]3� }/ / o
i t �� N
A3 7 ,, � 0_
/, z
/ /// O
u /
2
rI
w
Allikillifi&.& .
rI
O
u_
955 955ri
0 rI
u_ Q
z 0 Z_
0 u) _
1
J
J in
W w rI
co
950 A 950 W
45
/ \ — Q
// � /� — �\ (I) Z
r
m / \N / \\ EXISTING GRADE 2- I // ,� _ EXISTING TOP Z J
o / N ALOVG STREAM 2-2 OF BANK O O
/ — ��\ / \ CENTERLINE / \\ Q Q
� �� — �/ // \ 0 U
LI 945 — \ / - - - - -�\ �� ,\�/ _ \ \ 945 Q
co x
,J _ u_
— — ` ,L < Z =
` � - -= _ —
in
940 \ - - - - - - - - - - - _ �'� �� 940 < 0
`� W
U
N.45
Ed 5
Li'
J
z• z 0 H
W
r.
✓ W Q z
co
al
U
o Q
z C� cc
o
935 935
N J
PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
O
a
DESIGNED: MJG
o
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
al
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E
ui
z
w S6+00 6+507+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 I I +00 I I +50 1 2+00 �
_1SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
.1 \ I

r
CIIIPPFW EXISTING CHANNEL TO �6- �I Ta _
BE ABANDONED AND BACKFILLED X
N ----- „ \ ores
SEE DETAIL D2 �'� � ����rfiTkz, \\ X X X X .EACH ft I -B STA 13 +66 TO STA 26+33
�j' j ' \ \\ \� ' I8.O'
,,, \ \ / \N,2 ___ ------__ p 4.5' 4.5'
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
C %
' j'� / \�6 '��� \ BAN KFU LL STAGE
rr� — / j \ \\ \� Raleigh, NC 27612
�v // / / ' \ \�\ ��` rr:
,� - Main: 919.829.9909
/ / / \ \ \\.
/ / www.res.us
// �P \ �\ \ /—TB —— — TB
4':
/ \\ \ �/— — — — \ _ c- Engineering Services Provided By:
�\ \ - _ — — — 93 �_ TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION Angler Environmental, LLC
�l i � \ \ \ \ y �-
\\ \\ �� License: F-1428
ill — — rP, r \\ \ � ` ' \TJ`9 %/� BB � � �/ SEAL
---_ \ ) \ 0 'S'4 \ _.
0'\ 1/:j'
40 _ c)c
_____\/
. 4Q,,ict--_
0, _
/\. ), ;
,_-_____ _---
: G7 :/'' '//
/ /'K( '
„ ,,\
j\ �I '�� .ii.
;_ -- �� \ ' . .
\pJ� . �� BANKFULL STAGE I�
__\,.._.\\
,./..._N
\ ___\/ 1 ,c
roini
,1*- rnilift
` O � S— T5 ---- \ _ I - ..#4 / � 1 4-2
gg •
TR- y ,`� �/ —^V v �� �7 _
2 � / /����� \ �``� �;�� / � ���O__./ / 4- 1 ��'I., TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
Ai____ ,./ dr 2,1,11
— � '\ a _I 3+0_ _ — T- ---, 4+00 3-2 TB "'•......,�! �r1R4 //
_ _____y ,o 9 ' - - - -99 - -'CP .�d \ _ ___ , jam 3-4 y 6.0 4.0 9.0/ 1 \ \ -elliftrivi �� / \\��B— �. i ��Tg, Pj i P �I 1 BAN KFULL STAGE =.
i ,•,•.t• / ----\1 17--- -- -----4.1
_ �•.:c,::.*..... / m� FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/,<� o \ �I
/� _ —�� ���� O 0 30 60
3
/_ -0/ _— N �I �I 0
\ — \ \ ' + 2" = FULLA SCALE
w REACH FF2 � �I TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION � 1" = HALF SCALE '�
Z� (SHEET \ / �I
U \3� J o 0
REACH FF I -B ---- 14110 ---\/
REST\ /ORATION J
REACH FF I -B STA- 13+66 TO +33 Z
ENHANCEMENT III 0
STA I I +47 TO 13+66 qg 7 0
2
rI
w
o_
rI
0
u_
950 I I I I 950
oC }
O rI
u_ Q
z o z
EXISTING TOP ( Q
OF BANK j J LU
w w rI
45 945 945 LLJ
Q
EXISTING GRADE Z
H ALONG STREAM
coCEN-ERLINE 3- I 3-2 Z _I
_ O 0
Q PROPOSED TOP 3 3 3_4 r
cn OF BANK i Q Q
I - - � o 0 m
L 940 \ _ _ 940 j 1
— '
o LL
- — / \\�` � - - J \� 1 LL
1 /— M PROPOSED < Z
— _ � � - - - - -� / �vi� \ f\ CHANNEL BED i I
935 �- ^ �ir___::: — ,
935 Q W
O r
inU
T w 2 z w
z W p
0 inQ z
0 o Q
U
z cc 0 cc
930 1 930 o
U n - N n C0 Co co C9 N n C9 C0 n
.ffN N n n N C0 - 1- O coC9 in in03 cd cd V co- O- V cdN N cd - - N
a co co co co co co co co m m m m m coPROJECT NUMBER: 0423
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
II II II II II II II II II ° ° ° ° ° ° o PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
x > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
O w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
_a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w co O DESIGNED: MJG
acn
o C9 l - N O CO N N C9 N N C0 n in NII DRAWN: TRS
C9 ) C9 03 - N V C9 n - N V 03 - c0
�i + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + >
n m v v v in in in in in Cfl Cfl Cfl N N w CHECKED: AFM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
u) II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II N
CC Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 03 SHEET NUMBER:
1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1
1 n
1
Q 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 I6+00 I6+50 17+00 17+50 Q 18+00
z n S3LLJ
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
J \ I

„, 4, \ 111111\1!1111111 illr +\+ f
��v Ali7.4‘,,,,,,,,,,,3.p...._ rmilik _6;
N N -_- A� % v \ �,` \ �\\ \ �::0,...........::,
. EACN FF I -B STA 13 +66 TO STA 26+33 ores
3-3
\:#6n\
V -� 4.5' ► 4.5'
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE 1-27
� �110
���� BB J� z � — � �) 1 \\ \ �� �'� ��� ����`� \��� 5 � 3600 Glenwood Ave Suite 100
\\\� \\ \ . ,"---. \--1-.)N' .0 --- ----- -------- \ __
91 - 91 \ \ / \ ® f �� BANKFULL STAGE
A
\VAV ABANDONED AND BACKFILLEDI ♦ Raleigh, NC 27612
�v �� +\ (SEE DETAIL D2) / , I �� \A / •\ �� ► \ v f ��� 5-2 v — Main: 919.829.9909
A \ / C� WWW.res.us
\ Tom— �� % �V �� Engineering Services Provided By:
—I —g�\\ 1 1. \ +\ •. 24 00 /7;/
TYPICAL RILE COSS SCTION
\\� III SEAL
\AAA\ \mi / . q� I9.0
\o� _ _ 1 J+00.NNet•=. _ \ \ ��\� g3o \ y�� \� 9.0' 4.0' G.0'
\ „ \jar \ \ \ ism
BANKFULL STAGE I�
i
\� ��\ ...-; ' tX 4 / \ \ \ a
9� 4 6 \ \ \ \V
0 °) \\ \1/ 4- I
\1/ /
vv -re 4 2 2+ V ���
\ Oo
� \ 9 TB ���ro _ �� ��
V/
-,�� i ,y r'� \ ,,: � 1 ��'����:�� __ ® f ���� TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
• mrd'
•. A \ f \ ...����
Vir, \ \ 4-3
I 40
•
l
\,. . 4-5 yfi ,�� /
, G.0' 4.0' 9.0'
A ���t��o , \ V *f \ \ V �� I BANKFULLSTAGE
ill
il.t<-*-* X / / /
;re, a
4-4 Ni...'401R________ 4—
.• Ul In Z \f I FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0 30 60
' 4 1,ki:.. -----___ , \ \ c_
\ Fl / L \
..:..ors.
Skliii\ (SKEET S 14) I � Q , ,\ \ \
� \�\ TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION � 1�� = HALF SCALE '\
�,
9� I X x X X x "� +\ o c.,
O I v ® x X x X X X FENGE
7EACh FF I -B . I BARB WIR \ \f o
\j AR. STORATION V 0 P �� \ \
0_
STA 13+66 ' O 26+33 \ '�
\ * / ..,
/ :::',////// Z
2
w
0_
O
940 / 940 u_
/ oC >-
/ O Q
/ 6 o z
EXISTING GRADE /
ALONG STREAM / 0 Q �
LLJ
CENTERLINE / w w
PRE-DAM BREACH) / cc cc 0_
4- I 4-2
_ _45 4_3 // 935
4-4 W
2 % \cz \ - - - - � � — _ - - - - PROPOSED TOP 4-5 // ~
47 ° , \ - - - - - -- �� — — / OBANK 4-6 z
I .09% \ EXI� I INC;ING GKALM
co — — ,— ALONG STREAM z _I
_ / — — CEN1 EKLINE 0 0
Q — ° J \/
(POST DAM BREACH) Q
-I .04% PROPOSED -./ Q 0
I 930 - - - - CHANNEL BED I 930
7 LL
LI
c=n -�� /P.P. _ / u_
0 ' Iiiiii-Ki -.______ in ..- 0
Ic4C H <
6 Far
0I N -
Zin
925 925 Q
N W
U
T w 2 z di
z w 0
W Q z
z 920 920
z cc U cc
o
() - - - n co co — — co O N N CM C9 in in O V V O
U N C) C) c0 03 — 03- 03- — in — — 'src0 co coN N N —
N _ - 06-06 NS 6 to tc) l C9 tc) tc) C9 tc) 4 4 to cd cd tc)
O co N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
Trn II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
> >—> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
0) - w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
X _ J J J J _ J _ J _ J J J _ J _ J _ J J
O w w w w U I w U I w U I w w w Id w Id w Id w Id w
_ —
a
o C� coo 0 0 N — N N <o DESIGNED: MJG
p co co — o� l — co V C9 N C9 00 N N
03 o� o� o� 0 0 — — — — N N N N 00 00 ±
DRAWN: TRS
Trn _ — — — — — N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 CHECKED: AFM
0) II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
cc cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn co co cn cn cn cn cn cn cn n SHEET NUMBER
oC I I I I I I I
di 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 2 I +00 2 I +50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00
S4w SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
LI
J \ J

. If /yr
II
k O -
ores
/ , / I EACH FF I -B - AC N F F I -B STA 13 +66 TO STA 26+33
viRESTO RATI O N � �
18.0STA 13+66 TO 2 +33 Al : __ k BANKFULL STAGE 41 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
k
' J � �k Raleigh, NC 27612
��� I / / /k k�k - Main: 919.829.9909
if k
www.res.us
rn —l,\
I k Engineering Services Provided
/� EXISTING UTILITY TO BE — g g By:
z ill — TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
14
I RELOCATED BY OTHERS :1:: 428
AnglerEnvironmet , LLC
/ \
OQn — —
i�r..Dii4:. •p.`��::..• k ` I ( HEET F ) icense: F-1
,,.\ -- SEAL
w i
//
O. -- / / )\`'\`-'0'
\ / BANKFULL STAGE4-6 ,►��„ " : 1®! — / g� \ 1� ��; ,, 11 — I I — PLACE CLASS I $ II / o
x1k RIPRAP DS OF / / ,i �,� �� m </ m
CULVTOUTLTo1 \OO m� `�`� v\'21 � \ TYPICAL RIGHT MANDER COSS SCTION
/ ii/ �� I / �1_ _ B — °��� . _ ► _I / o
II i o ����
/��!! — T. — 5 3 ' \ 11111111 17-I-0O_ B - 19.O
_ _ a100�II 4�
_ I
I
�71/� BB — — I
3O �. II® — — —a� � e9 9 1�11��'3 � �iiiiiiiiiii i�►��. '� � _�-- `��•— — — — \ AChrrIC
i -I- 6.O' 4.0' 9.0'lir / BANFULLSTAGE (/I111?jJ)
— wo -----1�WIMP r �� ���=rm
-ring 1111!1
, _ i _ - ■ --- 11111 yam- _ liiif
c " s P 1 II . I 444A4010 44414 VAJVI-..-*.a., ,��... - _ I m �I�� ,d�� ��
� Z 1 FULL SCALE. 1 -30
5-5 TIT1 i// H 1 - - _ ±
- \ I91 - r - - 9i J 5 6
0 / - 0 30 I 1 o REACH - I- =o
I I/ :// , 04 = — ENHANCEMENT 11 2 = FULL SCALE
I
x _ �� ��� . STA 27+33 TO 33+02 �/ TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION `h 1" = HALF SCALE \I`
-
di
��
/ k /�� O
��
I i � ¢ N
0 0
I N
\� �/� Pirr_ rn
c -�
k ' ' ,/ rn
\ -1.-Ni _ , ,
x. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
i I �, / PROPOSED 72 LF OF ZO
EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE RELOCATED OVERHEAD UTILITY .�
}/ / ABANDONED AND BACKFILLED (SKEET F I ) (P I ) I I 7" X 79" ELLIPTICAL ARCH PIPE 0
/ 0
(SEE DETAIL D2) I 0 (P2) 48" RCP rn Z
}/
rn / I-
2
rI
w
0_
hi-
201 � 0
935 935 L
\ I 6E }
o\ EXISTING GRADE PRCPOSED DRIVEWAY Q
ALONG STREAM CROSSING
0 LLI Z_
\ CENTERLINE p
\ (PRE-DAM REMOVAL) CT)
W
\ ccO+ W w
0= rI
CC Q_
930 5- \45 \ H 930
0)
cz
\ 5-2 PRO-'OSED TOP w
5 354r"u
~ Q
\ IObAN
- - 5-5 (n Z
H _ \'_ \ A Z J
co
\ , - - \ 5-6 0 0
CI
\
\ Q Q
PROPOSED \\ I ii.
(� U 0
CHANNEL BEDim
% � j�� ���
925 � _ 06
�,
925 I-ILLco
0 \ w1 \ , 2
s / \ U
-� / w
- - - <
, - _ _
/ — Z _ - - - - /
w 0
RJ
I w z w
%jam j j % \ \� - - - _
27------'
Z
PROP 72 F O — Z w 0 F-
117" 79" ELLIPTIC L ARC h PIPE U 1.J•J Q Z
t
048" FLOODP 'IN 'CP — - - - -wc
z 915 1 - - \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 915 0_ (� a
n N N <9 C9 C9 C9 IN N N N - O O - 6� 6� 6� \
U in in 03 N N in N N in in - N O 0 — C9 co N `�
O N N N N N N O_O_— 6� O —lam N oo—in iS)—C9
Q •
II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
—> > > > > > >_> > > > >_> > >—> >—>
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
X J J J J J J J J J J J J J _ _ _ _ J
O w w w w w w w w w 111
w w w w w w w w
Q.o in _ _ DESIGNED: MJG
p —O N i 0) 0 NN in inN cm V Q.0 N .
O O in C9—N 6�—O
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + DRAWN: TRS
v v v v in in in in in in <o c N N N N N co
N
0 N N N N N N N_N_ N N N N N N NN NN CHECKED: AFM
0) II II II II II II II II II II ' II II II II II II II II
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q — — — — —
cc n n n� n n n I n ' I i �i SHEET NUMBER:
w 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00
S5z SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
L
\ I

cD
-1\4�,� / / v RE�C� FF4 0, ,
I (\HEFT S 1ii
1U (, 1
— — — x \ _ ENHANCEMENT II I
x\ — _ _ _ STA 27+33 TO 33+02 \ rrtr n 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
k\k - — _ — — \ i � 1\AriA1�r��� \ 0 - O Raleigh, NC 27612
rri
— Z Main: 919.829.9909
q
X xx—x—xcl /
-
= \ Engineering Services Provided By:
;�x 1 �_,�\\�- Q K 1 Angler Environmental, LLC
-x
License: F-1428
—L / ' IRCH -t -c-I
SEAL
s t �x�X�X�
A um X� rn
/ \\ k
O
xtx__
rn _
�� �� _ �/ j �� �\ REACH FF I -D
— — x��x�� ' AV \�\ (SHEET S7)
i s
/
o0
�; � -------- ---\L\ +oo v \ y �� �'P 1
o <s,. V �"� — - 3 3,J \\ �� � e
1-11
/ I \ \\ ------- --------1---1 ----------T-B----- -_ ----------------- ,-- - - --, __Ing--/r, / \ 1 1 A ----\ \ -Iwitt .{.-
\ 2 L ,_-__ ____,, ---------- * 7 — — :1---_--1.---55 7- — — ,g91-,i5-'---. ---- - - - 313+ I 4-1- ( \ a 4,ii-1- >x Ihi
\ N---'---. ----- ><_/ _.--- , Vi' \ p ,--- _ n;
:////).
m \ �� 1 v x—gi / 'k�k — V' �.4 �� tw A \ ram ���
-� - x �, ,X I I-A-- 1 1 1 ---'.","---4-'`..i..,.4.1 N i
V111111114
o�
/ ��/ � �l /,� O � � _ �X �k� � ''• _ A � FULL SCALE: 1"=30
_ _ Tam , m + x �► �tO \ . 2" = FULL SCALE
— T*0 / age,— � IT-- 4.\\ \
i � uJ � 1 A� V � \� �C����. . A��� j ��� � \ \
�• 1" = HALF SCALE
-\--
�_ems—_ig • k� -r \v . �ezare � ,
_ _
� II \ \ \ 1- ,=:,
Tit,—kwAPP-- ,_ A. j____\-9 ___Z 7 ____----N -----A- \ ---' *-iC 2' \ ---- T'i ----* \ _I ,-
IS VS( - ---''' II ______ ( ---- -' 'N. \ \ \ \
%.w.i. eli - ..- • \ — ---__ ____ _____ _______
.-,.ge,40— - z o --- -----\ \ \,(
--,>,/- \\ \\ \\
x
1 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE I �� O
I " REMOVED AND DISPOSED A A �� x'—x�x� / I rn �+ ��,� / O
OF Off-SITE V �+ z
� I _ v1N v \ / \ m . 1vy,vv �, ',� ,, c, aA �`y
0'
uJ
0_
0'
O
U-
925 925
oC >-
0 0'
u_ Q
z o z
EXISTING GRADE EXISTING TOP C Q
ALONG STREAM OF BANK j J in
CEN-ERLI\IE rI
ri ri 0_
'(15920 ' 920 LLJ
NJ \ \icm \—
�\ z
cz
m - - - - - - - - - - -\� r \'_ � z —Io N\ / �_
a _ ___/ — — — — — — -
L) U
LT_ 915 - _ - - _
— _ J/ 915 i— = 0
1
u
LL
I
Q z
co
I
_ _ _ W
o
o
z W
910 \ 910 Q 0
LL
�, g30
RJ
LL
Ed z di
CO
z w 0
CZ
v inQ z
o - QU
Z
905 905 0_ o
0
N
O
PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
a
DESIGNED: MJG
0TRS
o
DRAWN:
CHECKED: AFM
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
cc
Q 30+00 30+50 31 +00 31 +50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50
z S6
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
Lti
J \ I

�EACN FF I D STA 0+ 20 TO STA 15 +8T7
�C '9Ns�I'/,�C� __________________: — — \ 25'
o
/
ss/��c3O 0� res
- - T -:ak .1.-
1 3.4'
/���� F 0
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
� BANKFULL STAGE
4.
_ REACh FF I -D Raleigh, NC 27612
/:
13.4
FANG x� — — -- - / \ _ RESTORATION :i-
Main: 919.829.9909
O/y� O�\�jX�� \ / www.res.us
N
/ —x x— x—x x—x=x x
STA 2+36 TO 6+35 N
imb.
)4:-Cx���� \ /
�N�� ���� X — / x x x� A E ices y
_— x x
Engineering Services Provided B
+ x 8. I A Environmental, LC
/ - x_ Angler E nmental, L
�i �/ O 11,----*---- --k-----*----
— �' �� (----
/ �x� License: F-1428
-----r
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
/ X� \ SEAL
41:.,...,,,,,
41
GI 1
, � �;. �r� r,Q - yji 7-2 �I 4V' (f V �lb� BAN KFULL STAGE
' \.4 4;/ 1/It/ \ I 1 I ilk'.°N
41:-7 3:'7"11‘46;41"6:1 I I:14-.*11:41
Z Zcery /
0 --1y,?._5 / z z _Z
V ..1.. v,
Wii*IllitliAlft-------- i<//
\N\' c_ .... .. ...... ..-...„......-- .. ./.---. ........
r Z .. \ \
/j __- �,+;.,,�f Z dttX0-1,.::::\.,..... 4-\
/\%; \ \\ \N\\\ .\\\ •'�:;.,. TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
AI eir �T
_ _ , --,
0
O
( / \ \ \ \
+ Fj — / ® / �� V�� �/ \ / \ 0/),,, ---- � / - A+ \ 6' 18.8' ; 0 FULL SCALE: 1"=30
.I �� �� �� � V ��� A` BAN KFULL STAGE
od-- \ // I
�+ / Ts \( \ 2" = FULL SCALE
/ ) / ///f/ / ( / ----i-- / /
�� \ \+ N 1" = HALF SCALE
, / \ ,\\ N \ + ,<j
----:2
' ' 4-0 / / , 4 ) \ V ( 1/ / / / / // 1\
RESTORATION o / \� \ \+ x Q
Q /// ZA ;� \ \ o
1 / �/ STA 0+20 TO I +62F �\ i
� �v
�� I �" I + \ TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION/ 1 I�� EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE — ��+— � e v (ij + o� o_
7// G EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE �� o v� � �� v C \ ��
I < REMOVED AND DISPOSED �k �� �� hF � Z V '� + \
�l \ ABANDONED AND BACKFILLED \ � A+ �'
j}/ / �� �( OF OFF SITE r./ + \ \ O
r / i� — �� (SEE DETAIL D2) \ +V O z
' '\ / \ \ \
> ) \ / r /7/ / / ____--6 --- Z
/ Lir /4- 4- / / _.\ .` \ I
h.
1-
925
925 I I I I I I I I I I I I I oc }
O Ct
u_ Q
z o z_
Q
CCNSERVATION + j J in
EASEMENT N
cc cc Q_
Q BREAK II(
6)
920 920 W
- z
w w
N7- EXISTING GRADE U) Z
Q 7-2 7-3 ALONG STREAM
co 111
CENTERLINE z
z 7-4 O O
> O—o
Q N PROPOSED TOP
>—co
� — _ OF BANK Q Q
w Q — PROPOSED U
9 1 5 z0—' — — — — \
CHANNEL BED 9 1 5 _
H' I/ // - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ ~
a �_ 0.43% Q Z =
o o /^1 I \\
/ I 1 / W U
fY
Q / \ I i��% ��-,—,. _ / LLJ
Q
9 1 0 . !�_Y� 9 1 0 rQn O
Ei
U_ N7---- \\,-. -- O. O V
W
T '" EdZ w
cz
Z i-
1,-) z 0
W
W U Q Z
CC 0 CC
92
z u
905 905
o
a) — co co o.) 1- C9 — C9 O V O co
O 1- coin — N O CO CO co co 1- coco co co N
a - m m - - m - o co o O co o 6 m PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
- O O — — o — — o - — o — o 0 0 0
x II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
cm
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
o > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 111
DESIGNED: MJG
W W W W W W W
TRS
DRAWN:0 � c� c� t) CO NN C9 N N t) N - <o co 0-) CHECKED:
D: AFM—
C o+ -+ <o+ + con
+ + o+ + + + v+ <o v+ + + +
cs) O O O O —II —II —II N N N co co c+ 1 1- 1- in
II II II II II II II II II II II II II II SHEET NUMBER:N Qcc Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQ
n I
w I I I I I I I I I I I 1
Q 0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 S 7
z
w
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
.1 \ I

REACH FF I D � max /
RESTORATION �,X � X / ' 04 .EACH FF I D STA 0+ 20 TO STA 15 +87 ores
s� STA 6+72 TO 9+70 �x��X /
x�x�X \ 2 5'
T —.0 1 9.4'
41-1 04
REACH FF I -D
RESTORATION BAN KFULL STAGE
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
�� �� �' 1 3.4'
Raleigh, NC 27612
Q Main: 919.829.9909
s STA 2+36 TO 6+35 23 c� __ www.res.us
\� \ /
N
Engineering Services Provided By:
0 - �.4, 1\�" _ 8. I " Angler Environmental, LLC
-Ct- ,� QO�„ p� License: F 1428
Cz�G
V" SEAL
�� -_ / • '' :::• '�w.w' .ore.vr:: TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
/�x zz- / O�
,.
X
x�x C� — ' l �� i jafike,Ar• /� ° v x�xw'x 18.8' ► 6'
x�
00 r
r 44.4��� �/ I�t►• \ �x�X�X ri p.. BAN KFULL STAGE
r y 5-2 .A� ��-,v \ i�x�x .'
r
_ • vot-o, \ 04 ,01 41.CiaPa. 41'
. ,,,,„..i • s1.----)(----)A--- / 4L-401-1V, t\\ 1
Ct
J \G �X^� Jlli000...
• 4 Tel /�� i��a.��` � ` A ��������� `e r
.�P
..... , - .-vaireai__: _____/-(:\/ u
- oLt �x 7����� , � � �I
:::___ y � r iv, . �� ����� ,������ -_ , — TYPICAL RIGhT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
x • rdzi
_ XO 4// •
B 30T . 1 '
/ F—� 8 4 �- 1„�x 6' 18 8' ULL SCALE: —30
• ----::/ ,x Q4 11 //- _ t:-----: �'���� BANKFULL STAGE ; 0 3 6
/ / 'l 2„ FULL SCALE
7 4 �x� �� C� N 1 = HALF SCALE
x
X� _ T6. / 9 'i t
V
Q x, � i .� — _ � / W
C-D
__
/ / �t a- si..____.1. �, /' = REACH FF I -D X Q o
�G� G �x �e/ - RESTORATION' ~O N
�L x/X�x� �� _ ���� — TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION J
STA I 0+43 TO 15+87
-V ,.\\‘i,c\i --, - <g..___ ----- ------ -'- ___ ____ 1?,----
X
y.
- .xtkt‘t 11N -:SA ---- i S 13 _------- -;-------
+X�X� :3 , _________—___ --- _______ ,- _ r
/ �� �`� ;,�� `�i�11.0i g as` l / = \
liq x ____<,:_,,,_ _l_ _- / - zp , Z
-,7, G— --- TB 7 /
H
2
ct
w
a
ct
O
u_
920 I I �I ���I ��I ���I I �I ��I— 920 }
ri 0 rI
u_ Q
z o z
N EXISTING GRADE O m 0
o CONSERVATION N ALONG S I REAM + CONSERVATION + w I j
EASEMENT CENTERLINE EASEMENT o w w rI
Q BREAK Q Q BREAK Q cc cc Q_
45 915 - - 915 w
18-
F - - - - _ —I 8-2 8-3 8_L} PROPOSED TOP — Q
H t
_ OF BANK Z
m - - _ _ _ _ Z
o - 1 - PRODOSED 0 0
Q - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHANNEL BED - r
-0.45% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ______ _ _ Q Q
9101 imin \\ /�// �I 910 _
LL
- 0.59%
- - 0
co' `i / I \ O L.L.
,���� I I \ Q Z =
/ r���A- W14
z w
905 L _��-��L V�-�_�, 905 D
J �:� O
iii
g30
LL
.45
Ed 2 U Z u;
-
as
z Z I-
0
I-
o92
co
W Q z
U
900 I I 900 cc
U N c0
cc) N C9 N cc) n in V
.5 N_ in in in C9 � V C9,
a o 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
m m m m m m II II
u- II II II II —II
> PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
�° J J J J JILI J w w DESIGNED: MJG
° m- 'sr0 in co —� cc) cO
DRAWN: TRS
-o:iii + + + +co + + - - CHECKED: AFM
ol
cn �� �� �� II II -II II II
cc 1- Q Q SHEET NUMBER:
In I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (n di
I (n1 I
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11 +00 11 +50 12+00
z S8in
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
LT_
J \ I

OhE �I • E \ k k k
;W� M ��� I \ x�x
ACT ori> ohE Oh — — — �-(T C / � --
X),cF�NC ,1��:: \ hE OhE _ OWtK/ / / I �l /i ,/_ �EACN FF I D STA 0+ 20 TO STA 15 +87
x�x�x o® DOUBLE CIRC I 30KV zaHE / / / /�I /
2 5'
\k,_x� *dirt- \ TfZANSMISSlO I — — / �% TI5.4
x
"1 Pres
C II-_ Is e \ — — - - REAC �F I D oy /'` ✓N / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
w �a:' r� I � BANKFULL STAGE
x �� - RE ORATIO } /� 1 Raleigh, NC 27612
/
__� A � -x(k LC— - - 5/TA I0+4' TO I5487 I �� �� 13.4'
r.sw� �x� ON / Main: 919.829.9909
--
\ � �x�� www.res.us
r• ® — 1/ \ Engineering Services Provided By:
• •` ram — — — _ O/yE / �� g g
����� \ x�x } 8. I " Angler Environmental, LLC
______ � � I /� � 7 / K v
_. � • �`� x� ,fix — — — _ O E +�����1 ��,
\ A • r• \ \ / I N I �/ License: F 1428
\ i x N„ Q SEAL
N
�ifr ,k x� _rr ----- } �, TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
x
v �/ 4--- /-__) ---2 0:067-;_e,- 1404- _ _ _ max— 3 / � / oy - 30.
elriditillb:_i
TB- _ \ LI_ �� V`'`APl ._at ����'- \fix /�// +�, ENE BAN KFULL STAGE GI 1
> .l f► Z s ��-' _ '4•` 'i��t au �/� /� ..'fir
�� l�III nV A �� �
'' ::•rr,,; =�•�Ll�iiiili������i��� � ������� ��� � 9 '2 x� \\ /� _�`'� ,4® 9��
_i________
�' h 1
.11l�,..,o.....1111/0 II /. -7 --fir i
1 0 e / ��� �__
�� i.....
�_
�� � \ �� \ f 14: ���_ 5 k � j TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
, — z d� � — 6' 18 8'T _.... ..._ .....,
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
J \ \ ,C _� BAN KFULL STAGE 0 3= 60
+ may/q ��
\--- II
2" = FULL SCALE
������� 71- N �• 1" = HALF SCALE
�I / �i�w
__,b __ 0�l _ r f
.d, If w
��� 1
y--
) I- o
! I N
� �j� TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION 0
!
— IID
N�
— — — — I II REAL h FF5 z0
x I (SKEET 5 19)
z_
2
rI
w
0
rI
0
U-
ri
920 920 }
0 IY
u_ Q
z o z_
0 u) 2
(1) W
5 J w
w w r'
0= 0= 0_
45
915 915
W
U) Z
9- I
co9 2 EXISTING GRADE Z _Io [ALONG S REAM 9 3 0 0
PROPOSEBTOP
CENTERLINE 0
OF BANK
0 U
a
910 �� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,, 910 = 0
I-I PROPOSED - \ /� / —\
/ ChANNEL BED \/� O
jfr
Nco
N Z
- 0.64% - w - U
o I r- --N Q
/
cnQ
I \ \ I \ — 905/ 0
905 S�~I1--'' II SIS�IS 4. ��S-� �� � \ \ i/ \ _ lz0
di
.45
- - z ZE - w�, zy 0 Q- - fr
_ o Q
U
z 900 - - 1 900 02
0_ 0
U V - l <9 6-)
4) V cY) c) N N -
N 4 c� 6
o 0 0 0 0 0 o PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
m m m m m m m
II II 0)
> � PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
ox
J J J J TRS
J J J DESIGNED: MJG
a w w w w w w w
O - N N l CO N
DRAWN:
++ + + ++ + + ++03
CHECKED: AFM
N c� c� In In In
II II II II II II II
1-
cc(Du) Q Q Q Q Q Q Q SHEET NUMBER:
(n 11
w I I I
Q 1 2+00 1 2+50 1 3+00 1 3+50 1 4+00 1 4+50 1 5+00 1 5+50 1 6+0 0 S9
z
w
SCALE: KOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

C '� �I ��� 1 r 1
C I l � ' ores
�
(�� I ►Ili
iiir
\_`-�E x�_ III► I 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
x x_xx�x_x 1 I �I Raleigh, NC 27612
x—'� II ELECTRIC F Main: 919.829.9909
CE �-x—x_x_x FENCE
www.res.us
IREACH FF I Engineering Services Provided By:
LCE I (SKEET S2) Angler Environmental, LLC
\ License: F-1428
\ SEAL
\_CE b�\ \ \\\
\ \ \
\_CE _ 5+00 \\\\\\
\ \
EXISTING FORD /% —\/R 1�� —t= --___263--------____ \ '\\.
�= BB
CROSSING CROSSING TO BE � � / ��\� �O \\ �
\ \
ENHANCED J - �r �� \ \ \�
ql \ %\
r 2:\- ,,5. ___,---;--sg-,_-_-____7_, _-, _ BB ___ -
� �� � � �ei — �R — ---
REACH FF2 \ \ R ���,_ ram_ ` \ \�
�� PRESERVATIONS �� Te ��\� �� �\
\ \ , v
I ±00 s STA I +29TO7+3I \\ ) �� �N
\
I . � � T / � � a1 �� � OOY,
,,...,
==_-_______ TB
-99 ' ?y, -Q, �' J l� FULL SCALE: 1"=30
-- 1 — I 0� 1\�\\ k // 0 30 60
U \ \)/(
(e QI m 0 \ 2" = FULL SCALE
I r > \ ��I 1" = HALF SCALE
I— o
In -30— \\\\\ \6 di
\ ij
I \� �\ °
\ \>>--,
>_,-
Z
> ) \k /
0
\ \\\ N I) H
rI
w
0_
rI
0
980 980 U-
oC }
O rI
u_ Q
z o z_
0 U) 2
(/) W =,
_1in
W W r'
CC CC CL
970 970
0) W
N N I—
/
i EXISTING U) z
r CROSSING — Z
coEXISTING GRADE 0 0
o
w \ ALONG STREAM
— — — _ _ �� _ CENTERLINE
— — _
_ 0 U
960 - - - - - - _ _ - - 960 _
� � — 1— N
co
I
ON - � \ EXISTING TOP =z
o _ \� � OF BANK Uo W H \ \ fY W_
n 7 ��//
1 950 Q \ 950
W Q 0
.45 o� , _ --,. W
U
' i- N
> z Ed1 _
a) � Z 1-
- - - - - -_--_-� \ < W 0 H
z _
_ —, 1- 0
i
N
940 H � _ — , — �_ _ 940 o
O > - - _
O J — _
O I I PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
Trn
cs)0 PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
I CHECKED: AFM
0)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E I
di I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50
a
'z310
SCALE: hOR I "=30 ; VERT I "=6'
L
J \ I

C \ -) 1 C
--;\ ores
// „.N,
,), . 7,
\,„
7, / _\,\ i
, O7 i\VI vx 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
x // ,- \\ \ Raleigh, NC 27612
CM `b\/ / = Main: 919.829.9909
%/ 4/ www.res.us
iy/�\ (/ Engineering Services Provided By:
\\� / Angler Environmental, LLC
LC LC-
1\ C L C = \ 0\ �3( // License: F 1428
BLO / SL/
REACH FF3 i% �� A a
__-:-.. i j
ENHANCEMENT III =\ I``��5�\\�-J
STA 0+44 TO 12+23
i r ---G--k- - ' ) \ iii
\ NV�� ys— 00 e x��
_—-1- sly y i y,/ 1�
o \ �\ — _ O _ _ , �B _, \\' 's \ qII"ii
'III 111
1
� _ jki
x—X IIIL,,��0�01
\ i
x� \\� FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0 30 60
30 1" = HALF SCALE
N
� � 0 0
N
H
O
J --
0_ —
J
Z
O
Z
I—
2
ct
w
a
ct
O
u_
980 I 980 ,
O Ct
u_ Q
Z o Z_
O cn 2_
W J
5 _I in
— — — 4 EXISTING TOP cc
w w CL
OF BANK
45 cy) 975 CC CL
_ \\ — - \— — 975 w
r \ /
_ _ _ i / \ Q
— \ \ U) Z
\ --- -\ / Z
/ 0 0
Q � \ �� /N \\ \ N / \ EXISTING GRADE I r
u) \/ / ALONG 5I RAM < <
— L - - - � \\ — \\ / 'N CENTERLINE (.�
970 `- - - — \ y� 970 I Q
H `� - - _ - - � \ N\ 2 r M
LL
Z
z �� 7
U W — — _ — — \ \ \ 1\\/ / /\\\ VJ L W
-rif
965 w \ \\ \ 965 Q
z \ /� \ \ (n
cc; O
cn ' z- - -A \ z W 0 =
c o - - - - \ — \ram\ o Q
960 c \ 960 0_ o
U \ \
N \ - — __
_ PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
_° DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
0
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di
0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
SI I
z
w
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

iN 1 r 1
CQ
Pres
in
N C -
L C E - 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
L C E Z — Raleigh, NC 27612
L C E = (!) Main: 919.829.9909
L C E = www.res.us
LC E Q C) Engineering Services Provided By:
LC E Angler Environmental, LLC
k-N
REACH FF3 License: F-1428
ENHANCEMENT III sEAL
\ � N /5TAO4 TO 12+23
zo
B6_- 91
\\\____-_---- - --_gg ____ /,, \ \ -)5•1 --- ---- / 0 -A' /7„.:::: ---g__------_7_-----'
- ' - 113 -_ -<--- ----j\'' \\ 00 - -0
- ___ ____ :
°- / / /17, 0, ,-i ,V) ' -\" \ 651 i 7/
\ /_- - eel /%
---gl -•/:7// .r
\ 0° /C /// 1!
\ .„/ v , / _____,
i f ,---'-..---?3',- //ill
:- B5— — '
'is 'bi' ')( 1';')(
^ Z
LLJ rn z9
lJ _ 9� / FULL SCALE: 1"=30
4.,S
J i 0 30 60
X_ —�-
go X�' x_ / 2" = FULL SCALE
N.� x�X_ 1" = HALF SCALE
-3 1 -
- 01
0 -311 -311
in di
N
o -
- W
__z 0_
(1)J
F--- J
Q z
O
o
1—
rl
in
a
rl
O
U-
965 965 }
ri 0
u_ Q
z o z_
o w 2
w J
w _I w
\ LLI\ EXISTING TOP cc cc a
\ OF BANK
45 960 \� ,\ �'\ 96O LLJ
N \ \ i EXISTING GRADE H Q
_ _ - - - � � n \ ALONG STREAM (n
H ��—��`N 1 ^ / \ CENTERLINE z
\_ _ � / Z J
co w rY
—
\ \ J- - - - \ � \\ / \\ / / � l Q Q
I N. , --- — — ,� ,1 �/ \ n /- � C� U
955 �\ \/ � , \ — � � — \— x� _ -- - ^ � � \\\ ( \\\ 955 Q
co v - -\ � � \ / / \ /\ / /
— LLJ I
Q
Q — �\ � � — � J� \� z LLJ
N
950 \ - J 950 Q
— z C
z di
~ z
N w zw 0 0
c2 Q nWm w W Q z
945 945 0_ 0
U
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
cm PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
o
DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
01
w
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
di ' ' I
a
6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 II +00 II +50 12+00 12+50 S 1 2
z
w
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

1
16
L CE • Pres
0
L CE 03 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
W 1- Raleigh, NC 27612
z— Main: 919.829.9909
o \_ L C 2]COC = www.res.us
+ REACH FF3 U Engineering Services Provided By:
CV ENHANCEMENT III < E Angler Environmental, LLC
w N / 5+00 STA 12+80 TO 19+30 L CE License: F 1428
z I .-B € _ _ b = SEAL
L \ 6' I // ______L_---- - ----, N.:S',
LC - y2.7 y �� /
� � */ \0 1 4 4 CD\ +\
1141
1
/ / \ ' k �i = a1 �� r x� \ ��. /�t/' li ,
QK-- w I�j/�♦ FULL SCALE: 1"=30
/ r1 ' / �: .. — ., =99 = D /\ \� � ` ��— �9 . „� •• -u Win"
/ 0 30 60
_ ! X
V, 1/1/ *
f---- ---\' (k, 7 D ,,,,,N
1 € /9.., 0 \4- ) 7/I */ _f_
/ nl l — a ' L 2" = FULL SCALE
\_ \ / ' ) �\ L _i 4112..
��ii
1" = HALF SCALE
` 7_8! 14-3 In \
Ixi A-, ' I4 I
w
Q I
�/2
0 x,
�
0�
o_
_3C -/
J
z
0 ~
2
IY
w
a
ct
O
u_
955 955 .. .
0 Ct
u_ Q
Z 0 Z_
0 c) 2
() W J
5 _Iw
w w r'
4 950 950 W
CZ
NJ
~ Q
EXISTING TOP (n z
ccz) _— OF BANK z
co o \ O O
Q \— EXISTING GRADE F r
CO ' — — _ \ ALONG STREAM Q Q
'\ \ _ - CENTERLINE Ur 0
945 \\ �\ _\ , ---\ CENTERLINE
945 H = Q
�, - \ N LL
co — — � ' \ N N 0 LL
N — — — _
c — — \ < Z i
—�� _\ U
a �� , (1)
940 - - ��� —��J 940 Q
LA
Q w Q N — — — — — ��
_ Z z 0
`� � u U W Q z
92 -)0 0 Wa] Q W W
935 935 0_ o
U
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
DESIGNED: MJG
a
0
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di 1
12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 I6+00 I6+50 17+00 17+50 I8+00 I8+50
zS 1 3
w
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

k , , L , ,„
i *kr
/� �� ____ ____
__ __ ,„,,„, ,,„,,
�4 � _ - �� . EAC N FF3 STA 19 +3 0 TO STA 24+5 5
Pres
/ w...„
♦�i� \ \ REACH FF I \ I I .0'
(SHEET 54)
\\ p 3.0' 2.5'
�/ �� 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
BAN KFULL STAGE Raleigh, NC 27612
LC _ REACH FF3 / s.,, O Main: 919.829.9909
RESTORATION // / // / www.res.us
1
S 'A 19+30 TO 2,4+30
—
C ( —� / I / Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental, LLC
/ / TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
License: F-1428
I44 I48 . �. SEAL
2� 14-5 % *) ��
2 O �� I I .5'
, \I'M::
��- 41.
�� �' Vik
/ \ // BANKFULL STAGE ,14-2 .�0,,.� `��.'•'' � //
1,4.t. 1,,\.:9.4 - .,;-,,
1.
��fr --- TB .':�
r Q ♦ \? 1 4-7 / � I O D �%
2 \ 14\ ( \ / 1 7
�L - r j 143 � v146 � I we*** c_
♦
\� � ,1 . r v s , 24� / /
00 •
/ // --/....,„„:
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
4:...:33_____, gl it '� ,.��� _ / / (/////////.,�
\v 14 I
al
O �c 1 4 1 0 ;, /
.. •;:... •''�•••. I I .5' ��
*- -. 00 - / 1 4- 1 2 �`' ...,;:;;:. '''.: ��
\ 3.6' 2.5' 5.4' ��/
I BAN KFULL STAGE /�OD����
�� do
Eo
\ \ \ N,. -....:4::::i:. ________ V _ // ------- /_ 7
, FULL SCALE: 1"=30
(//// / 7/ /74\
930 I // �� 2' FULL SCALE
k�,y / // / �/ ,� 1" = HALF SCALE
��� REACH FF3 \ Il l/ / // / i TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
- . ENHANCEMENT III a �� / / /�� ,� o
0 0
STA 12+80 TO 19+30 di
�� � � � � � � ��� � / �// I N
%Niol /// b 1-
Z — / ''gam ;�i�i
------------------z \ ____ // / // _11/4 ftiliti:481411411111fte• >-
\� 1, / //i, Y / /c4/ /////
1-
2
fl
w
fl
0
u_
945 I I I I 945
oC }
O il
u_ Q
z o z_
0 cn 2
(1) W J
5 _1W
EXISI ING TOP
cc
OF BANK Q_
1 4- I
4il940 • 14-2 14-3
940
14NW 1 -4 14-5 Q
14-6 II 4-7 (n Z
r0 • 1 4-8 1 4-9 - I co \ I I O 2 Z _I�—- -�- -, - —�—_ T - P,� 14- I I PROPOSED TOP 0
/ Q Q
- - - - - _ OF BANK 1 4 < U
`0.93%� co,-
935 3
1 •49% _ - - - 935 _
JJ 06
0.93%
~ ^ — PROPOSED Q
NI EX STING GRADE B 2.g8%—I
— — — — — — — fChANNLBD 2 Q M
U—
o ALONG STREAM 0.93% — _ — _ Q Z L.L
0 CENTERLINE — - _ / .,
w _
pi- 93% Z
U
Q
-0.93% � w
1 930 4 2.25% 930 Q 0
U- p fY
-0.75%
�, 1 _ - - 0
so% W
-\,_ �! TIE REAC I FF3 INTO EdZ di
�� - -0.88% 2
PROPOSED BED OF 1-
N cow
REACH FF I Z W 0
�, w W Q z
z '; ! ° , ri
U 925 =_ 41 =� IPA- 925 0_ o
O O in in V C9 Co - - to to C9 C9 N V V - - c0 V V 00 N IN N N to C9 c0 c0 0 C9 —lei�7�aY" N
N in in co co C9 — — V V — C9 C9 NN — — V V — C9 C9 V O O O — in in O in in N V C9 C9 V ...
O 4_4—cri_cri 4—cri_cr—N N— _cY) —_--6 6 — 0-0-6� O - -6� —�_o� 6 N— C9 C9 l C9 �—� C9
co co co co co co co co co co co co co co 6 6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
Tro II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II O O II
>_>->_> >—>_>—> > > >_>—> > > >_>—> > > >_>_> >—>_> > > > > > > > > >—> > > 4 4 > PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
ILI ILI ILI ILI W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ILI ILI ILI W ILI ILI W W W W W W W W W W W W N N W
IJLI IJLI IJLI IJLI w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w DESIGNED: MJG
0 — C) CO CO 0 CO CO c0 in N co V N 00 N O 00 N — in co O C9 N in O 0 — V n O — — 6) N N > > 0
-co 1--1- <o—<o-t—co m o --N0Y) t in N-N—co 0 - N—O CO v—(n-<O N m 0 - v N m in <o—<o 00 N UI w N DRAWN: TRS
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + J J +
in O O O O O O O O O — — - - - — — — — — N N N N N co co co co V W W CHECKED: AFM
—_—_—_— —_—_—_— — N N_N_N N N NNN N N NNN NNN N N N N N N N N NN N N C9 V N
II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II O in II
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q + +
1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1 1- 1- 1 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- SHEET NUMBER:
(n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n N N (n
1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I J J I II II
Q 1 8+50 1 9+00 1 9+50 20+00 20+50 2 1 +00 2 1 +50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 �24� 50 25+00
z 1 4
J SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
L
J \ J

r \ ores
\ 1 r 1
\ \
,„
\ // / j � /
\ GRADE LEFT BANK @3h: IV / �
FROM STA 0+53 TO 2+00 / / / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
INSTALL COI R MATTING $ / / � /
��� Raleigh, NC 27612
/ Main: 919.829.9909
\ LIVE STAKE / �� � � www.res.us
/ /� / Engineering Services Provided By:
L C — L C = �� _ / ;Zvz
/�// — Angler Environmental, LLC
�\ — - �- C— - �C - --C- / � VC License: F 1428
/ / V y SEAL
___ ZZ ,/ I— (i., ,e
- ______ ______ k_____
_____ ___ ____ ____ ___ __________, j __
— _____ _ ____:— -------- ___---yr-- ----'- ___,, z ____
/ -— — .____----- 6). -1-\ , z-
otAt
\ I
7 - 1- QO \ / - ____- - _ \ / 0
I ;itfili% J�o
`��_ �
ce_ -�— _ C m�_—e — ►'f B �- — , / i
� 77tm af
_�� --- N--?'(- \f- T13------
7 - _�-
—, - - ' - - - cam— " � / / -
_ A - _____________i r K.
1 5 I — O
—
\ , �—
x FULL SCALE: 1"=30
\ REACH FF4-A — ,
\ \ ENHANCEMENT I \ V� 0 30 so
_ STA 0+52 TO 5+27 N
�� i / O 2" = FULL SCALE
- C-1 =01 _ O O 1" = HALF SCALE
7
BENCH RIGHT BANK FROM \-,_ \ // \ \ / / %k,
\ \ \\ — �� 0 / / �� Q N
STA 0+53 TO 5+27 V � _ _ _ _ _ — \ \ / z F N
SEE DETAIL SKEET D3 \ V \ U O
\ \— —� - \ \ \ ��� Q o_
PROPOSED FORD CROSSING
��
o�` �GO 2�\\. (SEE DETAIL D3) zz
H
2
rY
W
a
rY
O
935 935 LL
oC }
O rI
u_ Q
z o z_
O cn 2
() W J
J in
PROPOSED RIGHT w w rI
a
TOP OF BANK
N-
CONSERVA-ION+
45 930 I - Ln EASEMENT 930 w
N I 15- I Q BREAK F-
—\ _ _ _ — — EXISTING TOP EXISTING GRADE Q
OF BANK ALONG STREAM z
CENTERLINE Z J
925 , — /- — - r 1 925 = Q
g \ \ / \/ c �� � i- - < Z =
0 — N _ — w
N
w
U
_
Q _ _
Q O
RJ -- — — — — L ..„ 0
LJ_ -- w c G z_ di
cc, c 1—
z W 0 I-
C v w92
Q z
U
0= cc
915 915 0_ o
0
N
O
Co PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
x PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
a
DESIGNED: MJG
2
DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
0)
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
6E I ILii I I I I I
0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
w S 1 5
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
LT_
J \ I

.•\- 1//i - i , / / / ...
2_3., I / / U 3
_ _ __ ____ \,,,_\ ‘,„. o\-\ (..,, I
P44
o�� & \ON , //
ores
'�4V� /� . EAC N FF4-B STA 6+59 TO STA I I +03C� POPOSD FOD COSSING ��/ /
\ OH 15.5'
SEE DETAIL D3) II41
f / / 0, I I .4'
V 0 �� �� �, ����. 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
BANKFULL STAGE
Imp 0,\ ( // / Ralei h NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
�� ` HE \witit����� �� s? www.res.us
,� � � / , z / / � i _
c x �I
? OHE EXISTING ChANNEL TO BE 1 1 // x o Engineering Services Provided By:
00 ABANDONED AND BACKFILLED A
X \ /� 135' Angler Environmental, LLC
\ OHE (SEE DETAIL D2) / x License: F 1428
f
�"
\ \ E / � / I I / � x TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION sEAL
91 = \a 0 I
- - - �� 11 I � ,k, - � ' ' X
_ / , /
�j..►.i���t����� 99
\ ' \
__-- z 1(11 ) 1 1
. li
um,
1
_ -,
OHE �� �� 0 �� ��� ������_ __
/______
A I0 1,' \\„ \
�\ \\ \ X\ , , 18P .6
_ _ _ ripbxtf%
- . — — — ____ ___y , Io.B 3.0
:!.. .+D 074 ID �•4t,„• . I� 1 BANKFULL STAGE
.. �'� �� = 1 _
,,\-, ) j \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ 1
Act V
..\,...._ 144046.1..._ 4 4 \ (it.. —. — _ -,.. ________--
ff -� \\ \ \ \IA \ \ \ \--\\i \ 1
s\/___ —
� _ _ _
2_,),,,--y. 7; 1 \ 4
.ram , \ VV.mtb• ���_�,-�.:_� = — — _ � ..ov ru�r, \ \\ \ \ \ �`V� I�
lb /} ��e��,-� ,\ - .010 X - -4.0111 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
�% '` �
_ \ \
co — \ �� \ = �, " FEN ---6 / \% \\ v \� �%
� �V � � I6 2 n.
� J ��� \ \ �-G
v A`,, \ ' — �� �. \�\ ` FULL SCALE: 1 =30
I6 3 18.6
1.5-4P''*;
16 5 /, � v o- \\\\\ A \ \ \�
r \ \ A
�U \ / I o \\ \ \m\ �\ 3.0' I O.8' 60
164 I � \ � —' \ \ � 1 VA \� —= FULL SCALE
\\ \ \ \ � � BAN KFULL STAGE 1 — HALF SCALE
\ 0- \ \>< -\ \ \ \ \
\ \ s
X ,,,
x o
, \ r„,-,-/- \ m
,_ .
\___
c__, \ 11 / /
11 REACH FF4 B A , VLii
\>>Th
.::, c.,
� o
RESTORATION ', 1
`i * \ \ 0 -
STA 6+59 TO I I +03 I ��
0_
�� V \\ �; TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
/ \ -------- \ \ \ \--2---------/----/ -----W OZ
_\ ---- "\ \\\ /��
� � 0
� �� ��
2
rI
w
rI
0
930 I - 930
oC }
0 rI
N
u_ Q
z a z
83
EXISTING GRADE Q
CONSERVATION O —
Q 2
+ w ALONG STREAM ( w w
EASEMENT <9 z - 5 J
BREAK Q CENTERLINE C O W w o_
cc cc Q_
- >
45 925 Q 925 LLJ
1 6- I z
EXISTING TOP 16-2 16-3 PROPOSED TOP O a
OF BANK 1 -501 _ OO
wPOOSD— — _ ChANLBD /0, 920 � � _ / _ // /OBAN
- - - - - - � � �\ �/ \ — 920 I— 2
Li_ _ m
o.9i % \
/ O
\
o I0
II
` t -0.9G% I w 0
-
if
~ z
U _
1 i.S0% I 11
915 \ � - - - - � - - _ —� I 915
N - �I I w U
I I 2z
I I w w
\ < Z
cI
J
C APE U
w Q z
0w
o a > Q
92
z 910 910 0 o
N co V (Ni N
U 0 1- n in 0 Q.() c� IN O 1- n vi
N In in Oco
.o — N — in in 03 N 03 N N i O 4 O O O,
0o C9 C9 N n C9 C9 V C9 V t. V
- - - - - - - - - - - - m m m m m PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
:Co m m m m m m m m m m m m II II II II ii
0) II-II II II II II II II II II II II > > > > > PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
o wow w w w w w w w w w w MJG
J J _, _, _, _, _, _, _, J J J W W W W W
a W ILI Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu W
DESIGNED:
n� m v - 0 m m m m <0 -0,3 N N- 0 N DRAWN: TRS
u-� C9 N V 0 — In C9 CO O In + + + + +
+ 1+ + + + + + + + + + + o_ o_ o_ o_ CHECKED: AFM
�o c o 03 m m m
0)
II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
a� Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
cc
SHEET NUMBER:
oC 1 r 1
di 6+00 6+5 0 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11 +00 11 +50 I2+00
a
z316
LIJ
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
LT_
J \ I

C 1 r
ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
— _ LC _ CE Engineering Services Provided By:
_ _ L C E Angler Environmental, LLC
_ L C - L License: F-1428
REACH FF5-A
1� _ _ ENHANCEMENT III L CE SEAL
U
--\ STA 0+65 TO 16+75
� _ _ LCE
_ _
_ 4 _ -III^ L C
_ — - -rg —_ _ 00/_ �\
�� 9 -- _ \ .9\j +00
TB —
O
0 t ').‘-- —68---- '.6-111j1-1\1\-'N;I +00,r7---- -- -'-' .--- /i---- --Z9 ----- \\ / \4.. ,..- "Vt.---ar---- ---1 — —
I Pi
Lip\\`B _ 1I1I)
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
_ 0 30 60
i 1\ 2" = FULL SCALE
0-1
1" = HALF SCALE 1\
]C�l ]C-1 �� i
Atio
Ho
Q N
C - 0 O
N
�O o
J
,X o_
P
I
960 960 oc }
0
u_ Q
z o z_
0 cn 2
() W J
5 J in
w w 0_'
EXISTING TOP Q_
OF BANK
955 955 W
cz
45
NJ
C/'U)(i3 \ / /— —\ Z
o — — — \ �\ \ / EXISTING GRADE O O
w k \ ALONG STREAM —
CENTERLINE H
950 \v/\ � � \Vt^\��'\� /,� 950 E I Q
H LL
�� / \ LU
\ \ �co
0 �.L
— _ _
fY
o z — — _ -_��
1 ~ W
W z
'Cifw
945 w — _ , 945 ((� 0
N o�� W U
a)a) ILI cn � � \ � mac— i^ � Z H
o-`t' - - _ _ — _ _ - 0 W < z
z _ _ O 0
a
o 940 940
J
PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
a
DESIGNED: MJG
oTRS
DRAWN:
CHECKED: AFM
w
cc SHEET NUMBER:
w
z 0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 S 1 7
w
J
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

, ,, ,. .,
ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
LCE Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
r www.res.us
LC L Engineering Services Provided By:
4 Angler Environmental, LLC
LC - LC- L-C - L-C -
inL C= L C — L C= License: F-1428
SEAL
W
REACH FF5-A Z—
ENHANCEMENT III =
STA 0+65 TO 16+75 � f ����
7+00 8 0� f /3� Ij �
+00 --� ID =,�,�0 I I +00 \� 99 �v �� � — '� ��
B — _�.9 ��i�l ��,\ >Pj ,—BBB T� �� --_tp , _\ / —�Tg ij� �
_iic_ _ 515_,*) .) ____\ ___,,cz
��� - - - - ,ee « � � - �— �_ Ili. II§
��- - - � 111111111
,�- 1, - ---
i
IllilleinIIDI1I .,,��a�00
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
�C
0 30 60
.J-\ FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
I— o
O Q N
CD
0 O
N
o --
J
n 0_
\ _
Ii
/��
945 945 }
oc
0
u_ Q
il
z o Z_
EXISTING TOP 0 Q
N OF BANK w w =
- CC _I I-U
_ \
(91 940 - -\ —-,NN\ / \ \ \ 7
940 W
-t \ v \ \ ~ Q
_ _:_z__,.I
\ - — \ EXISTING GRADE V) Z
_ _ ALONG STREAM
Z J
m ' \ \\ �� CENTERLINE O O
o \ — —
— — ,
co � , i . , < <
H 935 935 H = Q
co 1 I \ /\ 2 4 LL.
o
1LL
\ ` � �� \ �\ W Z I
o
�� �.1 % - �� �\ i_ Z W
930.45 — \ 930
, \� _ -�� J\ W S
di
(I)) \ \\ \ / \ I� z z in Q E
°' \, \� V \ / \ \ w W Q 0
o 925 \ \\ I \� 925 cc C� 0
cc
:coa — — _ _ _
cm
0 J PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
o
— — — _ — _ PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
a
DESIGNED: MJG
DRAWN: TRS
01
CHECKED: AFM
cc SHEET NUMBER:
w
z 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11 +00 11 +50 12+00 12+50 318
LT_ SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
J \ I

/ // /)/ / C // %. c
o /,may`
/ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1 t / ' \ .y-� id
. EACN ff5-B STA 16+94 TO STA 18+ 22 ores
/RELOCATED OVERHEAD UTILITY / I / •`�
/ REACH I D ���
i (SHEET F I ) (S ET S9) /: :- 6'7X II I / \ \ /,��� ;�
k ���; 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
�\ PROPOSED FORD CROSSING I \ \O ���� /���� BAN KFULLSTAGE Raleigh, NC27612
�V / o- Main: 919.829.9909
DETAIL SHEET D3 • \ �s N
� / / \ /� � �' U N www.res.us
C E O — L C- I / \ F �� irk" Engineering Services Provided By:
(� / / / c_ Angler Environmental, LLC
LCEv� k / / \ ��� / // \ 1 .4' g License: F-1428
I /
...1LCW / \X / / / l ij/// ,/` / / 7( SEAL
LCE / e / /1 / TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
L C E O REACH FF5-A �v \ I /in NHANCMNT III O Xv % f/i !
k /W I �/
+ STA 0+65 TO 16+75 '� / L 9 lO \ �/� l\�� +'.., }/� 7r1 4'.. / P .4'
� 7+� O / �/ / � �`� �� 4. I ' 2.5' 1
— LLJZ -1 � _ — �� / BANKFULL STAGE
— �T /���� � ID . T. //7 r
= / i a-;:ri — :v-41. ---, ,,,,--1 T5 "1-\,,, // / /// Z tt / i
/ /
/1I +0O �0 L /�j / r '� ``' yj ��
19-2 / � � °/�� \\ /
/ /
1 \ _.._- ..,.--.---- ---- ----- N 2Z? .. -------,, ,,, ':-----"-------_,. -----------------\-,- _ /.---- --- I 9-3 \*,,.c5'x & -*-/ z
�'74---
_ ��% — — `� a= � � ♦%,O / / TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION (*tit%
10-/ --
- /' \\ //-------./ 7 , ,
9 , 6' < / tr. /47\0 i + 11/1/ di"
/ /7 :..r/ W/ 1
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
�/ / (-)
;'�l k 1iri 2.5' 4. 1
/
0 30 60
0 -30� �`� W \/ / ' �! / BANKFULL STAGE 2" = FULL SCALE
On 1 � /��.� I( ��� 2 1" HALF SCALE
00/ VI ; I � ��� ( \
II li I III I \ III w
N
It
\ \ w � � I '1l\ 7
REACH FF5 B \ IW x\ ` �� TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
RESTORATION \�\\�'I� I
EXISTING UTILITY TO BE �� STA 17+59 TO 18+ 14 \ -`-'��'9�{p� I \
RELOCATED BY OTHERS �' Li] \ ���/ 1 I z/ p
(SHEET F I ) U
\
tte'I 0 444 \„ rY
in
0_
0'
925 I I 925 02
I
I I O
Q
—�� \-� I 8 6 o z_
-� I I EXITING GRADE + CONSERVATION + O
\ \ / \ J ALONG S I REAM-- FASFMFNT CT) w J
— — � -�- - � - - - � \ ` CENTERLINE Q BREAK Q w in
920 rI
— - \ 920
w
�co
�� — \� EXISTING TOP I- Q
— — — — OF BANK 19- I (n z
Q ��� , (
�\ 19-2 19-3 O O
U) I \� � � I \ < <
9I5 x� \,-._ ,I �� 11
� _ 915 C U CO
LJ-
Q z ft
O - - LLJ
—
— T — PROPOSED TOP r
I
— OF BANK 0
Q _ — _2S9 W910 �/ \ ,\ 0 - 910 i
L ` _
vi
.[aM.te �� ��`�` \ — \ \ PROPOSED w 0
t S CHANNEL BED CC z
LJ_ 1 • •J Ed G _ di
% \ 2 _1
co
" z z" 0 ~
w / w W Q z
I / O ey > Q
0u y
905 - o I 905 0o
N N N in d-
o V a6� �l /
O
O O O O O O O O,O O
Q II II II II II II II II II II PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
>—>—> > > > > > > >
X J J J J J J J J J J BPB
o 'L' 'L' 'L' 'L' W W 'L' 'L' 'L' 'L' TIE BED OF PROPOSED REACH
PROJECT MANAGER:
v cV O CO i N in m - DESIGNED: MJG
o m—o cV in <o 00 m o N TO PROPOSED BED
-0 + + + N N + + + + OF REACH FF I -D DRAWN: TRS
:Co ----- - - - - - - - CHECKED: AFM
II II II II II II II II II II
u) Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
ccc (n (n (n (n (n (n (n SHEET NUMBER:
I I I I w 1 2+50 1 3+00 1 3+50 1 4+00 1 4+50 1 5+00 15+50 1 6+00 1 6+50 17+00 17+50 1 8+00 1 8+50
w SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3' S 1 9
J_

l 1 l
,
PLANTING LEGEND I �s: �, REACH FF I -D PLANTING NOTES Ores
I
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION 1 o RESTORATION ALL PLANTING AREAS
LCE ��_�' ` � . % � -_ I I . EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT
EASEMENT l : `�* / ��`\\` E VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND FINAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE CONTRACTOR 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
,, i '�'♦♦®?► SHALL INSPECT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY TO
°�� 'Y ♦`� 1 / .I♦♦♦♦ s Raleigh, NC 27612
EXISTING TREELINE '\ *y, - �� ®♦ /,- �r�♦♦♦♦♦♦ ►�♦V 9 ENSURE MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
i�` ►���t��� ®�♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦®� ,;C ,��%r a►,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦t♦�'♦���r.r Main: 919.829.9909
PROPERTY LINE V\, *♦���� ®♦ v 'r♦♦���♦♦®♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦®®♦♦♦�®i, 2. DISTURBED AREAS NOT AT FINAL GRADE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY VEGETATED WITHIN I O WWW,reS.US
\ ♦♦ ` ® ,/ -_-% �`♦®e•�® ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦��®��j' �, WORKING DAYS. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL
�` �® ♦♦• �♦ ♦♦♦jI♦♦®®♦♦�''s �►.„ BE ESTABLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN I 0 WORKING DAYS. SEEDING SHALL
RIPARIAN PLANTING \I44
��♦C��s ♦�� ♦♦♦®♦®®�► t , - Engineering Services Provided By:
(TOTAL AREA: 20.7 AC) Ilk / �"�k♦♦ • \ ♦®♦®®®l ' BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
' ,v I♦��'� ,�♦♦®♦ �- / ®� �' .tfe,; �., , **♦�.� �♦ -—-—-_�, ♦♦®♦♦♦®®®®♦_— ; Angler Environmental, LLC
��♦�����' ♦�®�® ��% v ,/ ®� _ �♦a ®�ae���r �� 1rr ►�� ��� ...:e. _ ���-� _ —�—_, / _ 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED PRIOR TO PLANTING BY DISC OR
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING/ / - i -- ,----- --T - �' `°�.�., ---- _ � ' �iz License: F 1428
m � � v �/ �" / � �- ��,��� � �� _ � � - ��� \ � �� � ___ ��� '�- ��`" SPRING-TOOTH CHISEL PLOW TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. MULTIPLE PASSES
INVASIVE CONTROL 1� _ �� of ' �„E �/o OH —o"E /
o"E �� �� °"E��°"�� — '�� ��—� ��: o"e� Rom= �- :"..----4-----------_--
A, '�,v —�� WITH THE IMPLEMENT AND THE FINAL PASS SEAL
amp o"E o"ER(TOTAL AREA: 4.2 AC) ��� / �� i � BAH �soH"HE e ��° __�°"���`� °�' __� �� � � ������� , ./.,, SHALL FOLLOW TOPO R PLANTING A EAS
/ oEoE —�o"ESHALL BE MADE ACRO� `=� v_,._ o -�, GRAPHIC CONTOURS.
,+ - ®;/ . -1C' _ *j`�'� �.�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� _4. BARE ROOT PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET D2.
♦ ♦�®♦ ♦♦♦® l°/ /i = �R� ♦♦♦ ♦/l�r` �o LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET D2.
:.•' I' \ 5. TREATMENT/REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, PINES AND SWEET GUMS LESS THAN G" DBH� i lik ♦ ,♦♦♦ I'♦♦�- ♦♦♦♦♦♦ 4. ♦♦♦� __\ SHALL BE PERFORMED THROUGHOUT THE PLANTED AREA.
♦��♦♦♦♦ . ��♦. ♦1 I �.���� �`♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ �yJ ♦♦� G. SPECIES SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED SUCH THAT 3 TO G PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES ARE
REACH FF4-A �, �%♦♦i♦i♦i♦♦i♦♦♦♦♦�♦i♦i♦♦'1/ �♦„_•
.,� ,♦�' �I, ♦®♦!♦!�!!.♦-+-� , ..
♦♦ GROUPED TOGETHER.
ENHANCEMENT I �� ®� ►�k, BARE ROOT PLANTING DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 800 STEMS PER ACRE.
♦♦♦♦���Ali.4691 >♦�� �c.
� I �'� ��♦�4\ ' v 8. LIVE STAKES ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS AND ALONG BOTH
' `♦♦4 4 #jl�-\ ----- f '♦., BANKS OF STRAIGHT REACHES ADJACENT TO POOLS.
Ii i •♦j ♦♦♦♦♦ --------------__—_ ___ � , / ♦♦. 9. TEMPORARY SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE TO ALL DISTURBED
I ����G ♦♦®♦A •♦�� _4 '' 4< AREAS WITH SLOPES EQUAL TO OK STEEPER THAN 3: I I.
� ♦��V°` ♦®♦� �♦ I O. PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE C
®��� �o,� ♦♦♦®®� �o , �1 '+►�♦�
off. �� ®♦� more `�„ �� CONSERVATION EASEMENT AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
♦®�� \®♦♦♦ I °°e �;'-� ,'t�
�'►♦ ��� , Art REACH FFS-B �/ I I. PERMANENT HERB SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
I / ♦♦♦♦♦ �,�♦♦. )/ •`s 1 4- CONSERVATION EASEMENT BREAKS AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
� ♦-♦♦♦♦ ,,�,''.♦♦ I I RESTORATION A �.-'* ��
„� ,►♦t♦♦♦®♦♦♦4. � ��p♦♦. >>♦��4 FULL SCALE: 1 _150
' ��� / ir
I ' ®♦♦♦♦®♦1.p�2 \\\\
0 150 300
one — 4 1 ♦♦♦ ®-'11, V /.
REACH FF4-B -- I % v �./ , vi v2" = FULL SCALE
- v / .t:;74:1:17'14:7
/ii / >�_ ���>-'� I N 1" = HALF SCALE
RESTORATION I I //,//,i 4,'�°� ��� 4,4A
, , #.:// ,v4* ;:.4%\irT , \l`
n r -�I®,. �� �.
i\i.
REACH FF I C 4'44- ♦•, ♦_
•_o_____---- ---'-_�---� REACH FF3-B
iti! ♦♦�` ♦�♦ ♦® - -- // } . 4' z
EN H AN CEO/ ENT I I s►♦♦♦♦♦♦&„„ .- ,♦♦, .-- �, �,,�. ,0
♦♦♦ems _♦ ♦♦���., RESTORATION ♦ c�
N♦♦♦♦♦����♦�♦ ` ♦♦♦���♦� '. to z
1�'��l►♦♦♦♦♦ ' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�=
REACH FF5-A y� •` •
®♦♦/,►♦♦♦♦♦ •/♦� '��♦♦®♦���♦ ENHANCEMENT III / t ' /. w
REACH FF I -A _ �. ..-��♦!♦�`� i :♦i♦i♦i ♦ •; f; , . II
.�����►��►„•t���♦"mot'14;+12,,,SA\♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦1:-_)•-:
♦♦��► 0
ENHANCEMENT II ♦��♦♦k. ....+:► .�vr�� / ♦<�� / �� ?� j���► vh,,,, 'vt w, ♦-i"I Altfra �y ��► ►► ♦•♦�tt�� �� �, • ♦♦♦40. ♦'��1� � �
N, , 04 44 ++.Z4tpyt.tr4C,11..'
�1♦�♦� �♦♦♦ /�► fit♦♦�,�� ►�♦♦mow♦ 0.
. � ' CT)o Q
E _ E E / ♦'♦', �♦7* ~ ��'��* i���♦♦��• '♦♦♦♦�♦®♦o��►'l♦♦♦♦�t����� / owc owc a
��'��♦i♦���. ,�♦♦�♦♦♦��1♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦♦♦fir:N. t ♦f ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�! �'♦♦♦♦♦t© ► � ,IfilirtikA
♦♦♦©♦ y y y ,♦ ,v. REACH FF3-A▪,� _ �� -- yam.. ♦` �♦ / ��\ -. ©♦♦♦icy '' y y '' y y y W,� �_ --�- ��� _ . •"� ♦ ¢ ,u. ♦♦♦_ y y y y y ENHANCE�/ ENT III ��°°� y y ygy �.
/G8./> . i'�� ♦,�r♦♦ _ 1 ♦�.�_-� y y y y y y y y t �` '/�
r/�/ —�:'?,.�'♦ ♦♦�� ♦n A� -6=-= ♦♦ice y y . y y /y y �c \ vJ Z
m /////�N �10/ _ i4k4► :♦:♦:♦:�:♦:♦�,5�' y y y y y y ' y , '� Z
in �� �� Nam• iv,
A, g �" e yj �� y A PLANTING TABLE H r
i � 11 , Permanent Riparian Seed Mix U
H / N.• i �,a����1) \ Percent _
Common Name Scientific Name
�I i rn ♦� �� ‘\ Composition _ J
/ h .--_`~-- `_ •. O , \ Virginia Wildrye Elymus virgrnicus 25%
I
�I i -, w `-S
Indian Grass Sorghastrum nutans 25% O
co N J REACH FF I -B � � C�!I ♦F Little Blue Stem Schizachyrium scoparium I O% z 7
N, RESTORATION go
r �!�� soft Rush �uncus effuses I w
�\ rn - *•w� I Blackeyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta I0%
Ct
-- �l/l ��1�F Deertongue Dichanthelium clandestmum I 0% � Z
�N. ��� _,:/� ° ���►���� �\ Common Milkweed Asclepias syriaca 5%
�` �� Showy Goldenrod Solidago erecta 5% Q O 0-
o
ill E
�
Percent 1��� Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species W
II 4
LWJ G _ Lii
Li_ \� �� � Z
�� It Common Name Scientific Name Composition ¢ 7
co
`� t1 REACH FF2 �J ; Silk do wood Z Z
----� \ Y g Cornus amomum 40% W 0
.92 ` `� II Black willow Sahx nigra GO% W w Z
U � A�--� PRESERVATION ,>J �II� tl Bare Root Planting Tree Species
I �� % 0_ 0
aa) 1 Percent
0 I , \
Common Name Scientific Name Composition
o_ ii ', PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
Tini Water Oak Quercus nigra I5%
cy% 11 I gPROJECT MANAGER: BPB
_ --- J rn Willow Oak Quercus phellos 15% DESIGNED: MJG
O ___�--�-- River Birch Betula nigra I5% TRS
--- ) SycamoreCHECKED: AFM
__ DRAWN:
_, American Platanas occidental's 15%
u Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra 1 0%
-_____-_---- - '.0 /
Green Ash Frawnus pennsylvanica 5% SHEET NUMBER:
oC --
Lii
Yellow opar Liriodendron tuhpi era I 0%
Q
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 5% P1
Z
Ili _� Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 5%
J \Li Black Gum Nyssa biflora 5%
J

/ I% ` /
I
1 ,
I /
LEACH FF4—B LEGEND0 res
- KESTOKATION
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
ice
I ' , ,i REACH I I I -D EASEMENT 3600 Glenwood Suite 100
° RESTORATION
... EXISTING FE N C E LI N E -x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x- Raleigh, NC Ave,e, Suite
i
ow
Main: 919.829.9909
'` ' EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY
' ;_ _ ;�, www.res.us
1\ Z V / i -
�, ��� �c , �,'� � '
PROPOSED OVERHEAD UTILITY --
PROPOSED OHE OHE Engineering Services Provided By:
i • 41111,
Angler Environmental, LLC
V
�� PROPOSED WATERLINE
�' -��� License F-1428
Ilk '' �� 1 /� -� \ � _� V v�v� � SEAL
\ �� 1 �-�o�- � �� ��i; - = — a- _��V Iii ��� _ —\_— I
\A` _ _ PROPOSED FENCELINE o0 0
-- �� ____------ -- - ------ .- =� �- `_- _ . . APPROX. TOTAL LENGTH = 9600 LFE OHE —OHE OHE OH 3` ill . OHE OH�OHE-H OHE OHE HE ——_
:.% ro OHE ..: / E �:,� �-� � \ �E FO R Nz H_ /o ��� - (SEE DETAIL SHEET D3)
1 �OHE�OHE OH HSMUGH E � E.� OH 52: OH SHE i/ t -—-- `_^ �'� V � . 1� ' - -- -
OHE OHE OH=-
Et.
oOHBRW, O _
ooH �o
71-'6
-- 1 -�� , 4 �� /� , 4, ��• �," �� -�-_�- PROPOSED WATERING STATION 0
rt,
11 \� \\\ �� \ � - ��..-�,��i� %/�'�/ ��// ��� i \�\ ` . .�- _-��..,� �, Ji`�` \°"f\ WELL LOCATION O
I
/ r4 ,---- I-
LEACH FF4-A A �1% \ \\ 1 , - --.--- "\Iii;j Jilt it- .;11;11,st\, P '/ 7' y
ENHANCE�/ ENT I I �. I , , j �� 1 / v �� �� � �W _
fl _
1 IRii'� ) 1 ) �"�� V :fie �O
‘ *
\ \
i , 1
....„ __
\ _
...„----- „I=
1 \\ I _______ _.
,, ,,, ,\,II,., /1 I \ __�__����/ _—__�__�__�__ _ this, .....
\ \\ \�O\C1YP ____
O / ,�/ �_ OHE ______
_ :Ivo,
, % i
\ \ \\
_____.
i , ..„..,„
.7„,
1 I ,0,,,,, _,LEACH FF I -C I , , v` \�/vvy,�m;�� .„ems°„� y,
v �,�� O o� FULL SCALE: 1"=150
I ENHANCEMENT II � � „v v ', ���,a 1 . � LEACH FF5-B � .. . vvv j
„� \� 1 / / 0 150 300
,. .„e �� vv vv 1„ °�� ICE ST O I�AT I ON —
I, 1/ode A V A A \ V A :\\\V.• 1 1 I ���
/ 1 I 1 v v v v ._ ,„\ \v 2 = FULL SCALE
\ � °„ � , I � / v v v v v w�,,._.--• / v � 1�� = HALF SCALE
% i_ _________ - i
_,-__ __,,, k01, ,,,, „ __,7_„-7,\ \ \
.P ¢ o
i / / �// / 1
. I A h . / / 2 yt I
N
I1 II (I �, 1 \ i \ ® 0- ,-
/ \ \
V J
1�
���V� ( 1 I �• LEACH ���-A �� '' �N J
��\V�� VI ���-- = �I 1� I �'b, Z
i;���o�—=—--=-- -===_�'� ENHANCEMENT III o
o
��-- - _ Z
_ �� ,,; �
/ \ v
,. / ---) \ LEACH FF3-B 1,�1 w
NN
� II ! // 1 \- / y� �� -"� ��
:/-c-
./ y ,,�-� \ I�ESTOI�ATION O
/, s ri 1
\ \ %I ii
I/ O
/
/ i ..-- . \)"
w
r - -�� 9' ,� l ‘ Z 0 Z
/ %, \ 0 U) 2
/ 9 9 1 ,,,. mm/ �� Imo_ - (� iiiQ
/ u r� 1 //'/ / .,' i c-, W W fI
, . \ : : _
.1‘.0,,,,/;:iii,..„ / ,, , ( ..
/ „,% y/ \---....,,...--4,_ ...,- i ,, ( / ‘ •
'' ----_--, /. \ \ 'NI\
LLJ
N / 9 4 '' 9 9 - /9
E �= '; , ���� ��� �,' y� ,� y� � LEACH FF3-A n
LL / m� _,__=u��_ �� =�.= �'a��..- -_ 1. �"�A . `-� mil �� 9 y 9 � �, L
co , �. � =R� z _ee�_ ,, _-„ . ),�, ��t_ ��, - , , '�,� EN hANCEf�/ ENT III -
01 /iN
-0 , \,// // i-'3-\ I ‘
0 U cn
Lti / �{ wIii,,.„
H
/ AI \
� :.__� LJJ
C
F c
u •
LI,
LLJ
��. ,A ) REACH FF I -B -J � <c� Et r O
% Et
/ ��, I�ESTOI�ATION ���' '` H
cn 0_
;/ LEACH FF I -A �� rn - ,� c� Q p
2
.45
ENHANCEMENT II � Et
Eri, � , , � : z
I A,1 nr � W W
LLJ
2
o ., cc
\ LEACH FF2 �J> �, 1 0
--_ t _-----_---1 `� I o
Q ,�, --- , PIESEKVATION �� I
o , 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
x
' I PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
o
�' , DESIGNED: MJG
\,_.:,,
' DRAWN: TRS
Te-n ____� \ FENCING NOTES:
cm _--_------ 1 ', I I . CONTRACTOR TO TIE PROPOSED FENCE CHECKED: AFM
ccc �a., I INTO EXISTING FENCE WHERE APPLICABLE SHEET NUMBER:
L ______,_, '' J TO MAINTAIN CATTLE EXCLUSION.
w ___ -- o \ 7 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL FENCING
z ___—---- LOCATED WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSERVATION F 1
J EASEMENT.
u=
''D'\ 1\ J

C 1 r
WHEN AND WHERE TO USE IT
SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE IN AREAS: FLOW
I .25 LB./LINEAR T. STEEL POSTS
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE IS I00-FEET. g MIDDLE LAYER TOP LAYER
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS (NORMAL[PERPENDICULAR] TO FENCE LINE) IS 2H: I V. EXTRA STRENGTH BOTTOM LAYER
THAT DO NOT RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOWS GREATER THAN 0.5 CFS. res
FILTER FABRIC 6' -N 112.2 ,
� 4/ rliel purl*******dell**lead*flat ifplipille1 EARTH SURFACE
DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE ACROSS CHANNELS OR USE IT AS A VELOCITY CONTROL BMP. T� L4!I!&I!I!I!&'I!1!I!1!I!ld
,,,,
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: \ STUN--q A �������111 A \\ ; I /�i\ .\\/,i./\ 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
I . USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OR POLYESTER, WHICH IS \ ` , , _ ` �ePi I Raleigh, NC 27612
CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 646 I I . ' ` c B TRENCH 0.25' DEEP
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A \\\\\` HEAVY DUTY PLASTIC TIE ONLY WHEN PLACED ON Main: 919.829.9909
MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 0°TO I 20° F. / ` ` . . . FOR STEEL POSTS PLAN VIEW ENDS OF BAGS IN EARTH SURFACE www.res.us
2. ENSURE THAT POSTS FOR SEDIMENT FENCES ARE I .33 LB/LINEAR FT STEEL WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH \ \\ ADJACENT ROWS BUTTED
COMPACTED EARTH ' \ \ \ 41 SLIGHTLY TOGETHER
MAKE SURE THAT STEEL POSTS HAVE PROJECTIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC. / SEE NOTE LOWEST POINT Engineering Services Provided By:
` ` ; ' : , SECTION B-B Angler Environmental, LLC
CONSTRUCTION: ���0 \ \j GROUND LEVEL g
I . CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS. �\�` , A / ,\ , License: F 1428
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND SURFACE. \ . SEAL
(HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE.) / BURY FABRIC \ \
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE EITHER FLAT BOTTOM \ / / NOTES:
JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 OR V BOTTOM TRENCH +� �\ ,...(\,..,,,,,....., - / EARTH SURFACE
FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST. SHOWN BELOW SECTION A-A I I . END OF DIKE AT GROUND LEVEL TO BE HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST
4. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE. POINT OF FLOW CHECK
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS. WIRE OR ELASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 SILT FENCE INSTALLATION 2. SUFFICIENT SANDBAGS ARE TO BE PLACED TO PREVENT SCOURING
POUND TENSILE STRENGTH. 3. SANDBAG BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF THREE LAYERS OF
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF POSTS SANDBAGS. THE BOTTOM LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF 3 ROWS OF
AND U FROM THE BARRIER. BAGS, THE MIDDLE LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF 2 ROWS OF BAGS AND
I 2 INC
6. PLACEINCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH. THE TOP LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF I ROW OF BAGS
7. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION OF FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC 4. THE RECOMMENDED DIMENSION OF A FILLED SANDBAG SHALL BE
THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE.
8. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES. COMPACTED v COMPACTED v MAINTENANCE: APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT X 0.5 FT X I .5 FT
EARTH EARTH NO
I . PERIODICALLY INSPECT SANDBAG DIKE FOR
MAINTENANCE: DAMAGE AND LEAKS AND REPAIR AS NEEDED
RUNOFF 00 RUNOFF 00
J
I . INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS cil
_
IMMEDIATELY. -� NTS
2. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT WA
PROMPTLY. N N
3. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND
TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. J V-
4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND �J
STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED. FILTER
FABRIC 4 FILTER FABRIC
V-SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NOTES:
FIAT-BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL A1111I
-y I I. EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY IN DRY AND/OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
.# 2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHOULD BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM STREAM FLOW.
CPO o•'0 COARSE AGGREGATE 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE STABILIZED IN ONE
, G .41.el STONE SIZE = 2"-3" WORKING DAY. A MAXIMUM OF 200 FEET MAY BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME.
t) '4. 40 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PUMP SIZE SUFFICIENT TO
.O."�. PUMP BASE FLOW.
TEMPORARY SILT PENCE ',o . o �-� 5. DIKE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF NON-ERODIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS SANDBAGS.
�0•� �0�0'� SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
NTS41.4i o 0 0 0 0 1/ W
II� 10�� �-����(I1 I. INSTALL STILLING BASIN AND STABILIZED OUTFALL USING CLASS A RIP RAP AT THE Q o
� �tWa"li O O O O • DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT WORKING AREA. p N
��IIIIIIIIIIIII'14 y% , 4.•°' •��� • 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND PUMP AND THE TEMPORARY PIPING 0 N
�� �� THAT WILL CONVEY THE BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA TO THE J
STEEL POST
4' MAX STEEL POST �����O�O�O�O� STABILIZED OUTFACE.
HARDWARE CLOTH S 4�I������< �! 3. INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM
WASHED STONE HARDWARE CLOTH C' �c� �L2 �it DIVERSION.
WIRE FENCING �/ �tr�N �°����
(NCDOT#5 OR#57) BETWEEN POSTS AND WASHED STONE N �ro• .�0 4. INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND DEWATERING PUMPING APPARATUS IF
(IF APPLICABLE) �• ram/r' NEEDED TO DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND HOSE FOR THIS PURPOSE
COVERED BY STONE (NCDOT#5 OK#57) INSTALL PIPE PER DESIGN ��� ,,..I�� Z
�'' 1111 " ""'74!•7" 44 40 ) = SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA. THIS WATER WILL ALSO BE Z
�.*- . *4-• •�Oc9KG44i (IF NEEDED) '' N
WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
°.1• r ► ��Oi �� PUMPED TO AN OUTFALL STABILIZED WITH CLASS A RIP RAP. 0
• +'1 e:c' 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE
* ' ___ __ _ __ _ _" a '`. FLOW REMOVAL OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE. WHEN DEWATERING AREA, ALL DIRTY WATER MUST BE Z
„,-►„-_,�,� ����„��,11,� PUMPED THROUGH A SILT BAG. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
,UI�4J4:..4_CO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - `.L_►eau G. _
1 __ 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=I - •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•..... - " FLEXIBLE HOSE/PIPIN G STARTING WITH THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE FIRST.
1=III=III=III= =III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III= I1=III=III= MI II t- I1-III-III-111a11III-III ITi 1 PURPOSE:
i 11III111III I11I11I11I11I11I11I11III111III111III111III1111 =111III1I - 111 ,11:,111 III=III=III=111="=III-1 6. ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED, REMOVE ALL RIP RAP AND IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND
III=111=III= -III=111EIII=111EIII=111EIII=III=III=III=III=111=111=111=111= 11=111=111= - 1111=111 STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH SEED AND MULCH. fI
11 111 IIIEIII-Ill i11= EIIIEIIIEIIIE111111 III 111EIIIEHIEHIEHIEHIEHIEEI -111=111 ' STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHOULD BE USED AT ALL POINTS WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING A 7. ALL WORK IN CHANNEL MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE REMOVING IMPERVIOUS DIKE. LLB
-111=III- -III I i I I i iEi l i l l l-l l -III1 i I it i l-1 l 1-1 i 1-1 i 11 it i ll�l-- =1 i 1 III „ CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD. INSTALL A CULVERT PIPE ACROSS THE ENTRANCE a
-IIIIII III- ANCHOR SKIRT; WHEN NEEDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 0-
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
GENERAL NOTES: COMPACT BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: 0
MAINTENANCE NOTES: I . CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AND I.2E }
1 . SEDIMENT FILTER OUTLET AND HARDWARE CLOTH SHALL BE I G INCHES HIGH BUT NO TALLER PROPERLY GRADE IT. 0 C'
THAN 18 INCHES. 1 . FILTER OUTLETS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR 2. PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL, AND SMOOTH IT. FLOW Lt_ Q
2. HARDWARE CLOTH SHALL BE ANCHORED TO THE STEEL POSTS SECURELY USING APPROPRIATE HIS AGENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING 3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET. 6 p Z
LLJ
ANCHORS. HARDWARE CLOTH SHALL BE KEYED IN A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES IN LENGTH AND PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REPAIRS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 4. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO O
BACKFILLED PROPERLY AS SHOWN IN ABOVE DETAIL. HARDWARE CLOTH TO BE SAME AS STD. SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE.
2. THE STONE SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY AFTER ANY EVENT THAT HAS CLOGGED J
#30.09 (I 9 GAUGE, 1/4" SPACING). INTAKE HOSE
3. OR REMOVED IT. CLASS A ( J W
3. POSTS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 4 FEET APART. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH HALF THE STONE
W W �'
4. SITE OUTLETS AT ANY POINT SMALL CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE ANTICIPATED AND AT THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE MAINTENANCE: CC CC Q_
45 DIRECTION OF THE INSPECTOR. SILT FENCE OUTLET 15 REMOVED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM TO THE EXISTING PUMP AROUND
o) 5. ONE ACRE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA PER OUTLET. I . MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION PUMP
GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH 2-INCH STONE.
SILT PENCE OUTLET �''
2. AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. �'�� w
ca 3. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC WORK r i
H DE WATPUING MP AREA `L%
NTS ROADWAYS, OR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS.
in
0 TEN/PORAY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IMPERVIOUS •
``-� z J
O O
DIKE
INSTALLATION NOTES: NT5 ;■ IMPERVIOUS DIKE I- r
��,� Q Q
J SITE PREPARATION FLOW � � 0 U
wI. GRADE AND COMPACT AREA. NOTES: # 5 WASHED STONE
p 2. REMOVE ALL ROCKS, CLODS, VEGETATION, AND OBSTRUCTIONS SO THAT MATTING WILL I . CONSTRUCT DAM ACCORDING TO NCDENR EROSION CONTROL MANUAL s B I�.� 4 >J
HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE SOIL. DISCHARGE 2. RIRAP SHALL BE CLASS II 3. PREARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 3 TO 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL ABOVE FINAL GRADE. 3. PLACE ROCK DAM AS SHOWN ON PLANS. EXTEND CLASS B RIP RAP ROCK • STON J
4. TEST SOILS FOR ANY NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES AND SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO THE r.
NI ENGINEER. APPLY ANY TREATMENT SUCH AS LIME OR FERTILIZERS TO THE SOIL IF NEEDED. APRON 2 FEET DOWNSTREAM FROM TOE OF ROCK DAM tdd�#�1,0'* -�!•xx•eJw►. 1 WWII W 2 O
o KEY IN MATTING ,'� �Tso IT La .
SEEDING 1. I. ;� t' �_ /
MAINTENANCE: �;�, � � � •,� Q��� 1=, NOTE: NOSE SHOULD BE < z Q
C`3 A ��� � � � • A �^ KEPT OUTSIDE OF WORK
�7u dY�gY�vr��7u`f�Y SILT BAG ,1��/ AREA w
I I. SEE PLANTING SHEETS FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS. I I . INSPECT CHECK DAM PERIODICALLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT "��1.1.1.10' LOCATION ♦ V w
6 2. APPLY SEED TO SOIL BEFORE PLACING MATTING. RAINFALL EVENT FOR DAMAGE AND SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION -•_•-•-•=•=•=•-• �� I- 0
Q PZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZJ
2. AT A MINIMUM, REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN ACCUMULATIONS REACH l•- -••-••-••-••-••-•
U �.
INSTALLATION -STREAM BANK ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE V)
in I.0'THICK CLASS
E 3. REPLACE OR CLEAN SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE AS NEEDED TO g ROCK APRON B STABILIZED OUTFACE Q
i I I. SEE GRADING NOTES ON ELAN AND PROFILE SHEETS AND DETAIL SHEETS FOR ALLOW WATER TO DRAIN THROUGH THE DEVICE BETWEEN __RAINFALL FILTER FABRIC
L 0
INFORMATION REGARDING WCLASS A STONE HAT AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE COIR MATTING. ---_ --- EVENTS V) / 1
.N2.0 2. OVERLAP ADJACENT MATS 6" (IN DIRECTION PARALLEL TO FLOW) AND ANCHOR EVERY I2" ' PLAN w t.J
ca ACROSS THE OVERLAP. THE UPSTREAM MAT SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE DOWNSTREAM MIN. STAKE MATTING JUST 0� Ed z di
ro 3. EDGES SHOULD BE SHINGLED AWAY FROM THE FLOW OF WATER. ABOVE CHANNEL TOE
DISCHARGE _1
`� AND BACKFILL W/ W(SPILLWAY) EXISTING HOSE Q z
I-
(L) 4. LAY MAT LOOSE TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH SOIL. DO NOT STRETCH TIGHT. 0
5. ANCHOR MAT USING BIODEGRADABLE STAKES. RIFFLE MATERIAL 2' MIN. 5'3111111
STREAM WIDTH FILTER FABRIC GROUND w
c 6. EXTEND MAT 2 TO 3 FEET PAST TOP OF BANK. SPILLWAY CREST I' MIN OF# 5 (� w Q Z
92 7. PLACE ADJACENT ROLLS IN THE ANCHOR TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OVERLAP. I I WASHED STONE STABILIZED OUTFACE I 15'TO 20' I 0
0 SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES, BACKFILL ANCHOR TRENCH, AND COMPACT SOIL. --- -- 6" RIFFLE
U 8. STAKE AT I2" INTERVALS ALONG OVERLAP. MATERIAL v �v �- '-� -�- CLASS A STONE
Z --- -- CLASS B RIP RAP �? T fi
9. IF MORE THAN ROLL IS REQUIRED TO COVER THE CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK DOWNw• - - �-� •-� 0_ p
y�,i yi yam_
�. - --
o TO THE TOE, THEN OVERLAP MATTING BY A MINIMUM OF I'. ,i-� Z � ` . / i - / •• ••• : • •• ;
••i�i - v FLOW - - - - - �, \//\/\\ � \/ i/\\,
Q I .O'THICK CLASS ��till 'tap'tap'tip �� _� � /\/\\ \/\\ //\ \ /\/
�Oi��0�0��:� a R�i�i�i�i�i� /\\/\i\i\\i\\/ i\\\ \/ \/\\ PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
B ROCK APRON /\i \ \\ /i\� \ /\
o) EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE • •• • • • • �.. N -- N N . •/ • • • \ PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
��A&OiOi 0 op•*Vc•It:. � ,��� � � 8" OF CLASS A DESIGNED: MJG
x
o FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
Lam.;.- .- .- .- .-•T. _•_
_ N lea ler STONE
• I00 ToCOCONUT FIBER(COIR) TWINE WOVEN INTO A COI R MATTING
DRAWN: TRS
CUTOFF TRENCH CHECKED: AFM
.ci) HIGHFILTER FABRIC CLASS B FILTER FABRIC EXISTING
THICKNESS
STRENGTH MATRIX. NTS RIP RAP CHANNEL
� • THICKNESS - 0.35 IN. MINIMUM.
SHEAR STRESS 5 LBS/SQFT SECTION B B SECTION A-A
cc SILT BAG PROFILE SHEET NUMBER:
• FLOW VELOCITY- OBSERVED 16 FT/SEC
Li • WEIGHT- 29 OZ/SY
Li • OPEN AREA - 38%
z • SLOPES UP TO A MAXIMUM OF I : I TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAfV
w PUfVP AROUND * DEWATERING DETAIL Dl
J_
L_
NTS NTS
I

c 1 r 1
Pres
FLOW
MIN 12.0'
COIR FIBER CHANNEL BOTTOM EXISTING EROSION CONTROL 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
MATTING OF BANK GRADE WATTLE/SILT FENCE Raleigh, NC 27612
0.75"TO 2" _ COARSE BACKFILL
INSTALL LIVESTAKES 1 I Main: 919.829.9909
AROUND OUTSIDE OF FLAT TOP END ® 1 -77�—,/ SLOPE
NON-WOVEN T�7�\ \.\�� _ EXISTING www.res.us
MEANDER BENDS INSTA+ + AROUND N DLL LIVESTAKES STRUCTURES CTU RES + 1 O— GEO(CDOT TYFABRIC
E II) A \/��%\/\\/\\//\\\/\\\/ // /\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\\/\\' \/\\\\\\,\\ \�/\\\ GRADE
+ + + + + + + + �,///// // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // / r/ Engineering Services Provided By:
+ ++++++ ++++++ ++++ + LATERAL BUD 01 \\\\i\\%\%\%\/\\i�\,\,\,\,\\//\\///\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\ \\ Angler Environmental, LLC
+++++ ++++++ ++ ‘. o -�o o�o� o� o� , - NOTES: \ \��\/\ \//�//% License: F-1428
�'• SEAL
\ I I . MAINTAIN HAUL ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION
1 / B \ =��= = = O 2. RETURN TO ORIGINAL GRADE AT THE COMPLETION OF WORK
/ - ----- ---\Jo
O� \ REMOVED AT I ,p �� ��_ C 4. REMOVE COMPOST FILTER SOCK UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION
K� ,_
SLIGHT ANGLE I z = ----�`-__ __—�-_-- - - -
- f Low '� -= _ --
________
++++ + _____ _s.
+++ WATER TABLE ' hiGh —YPICAL HAUL ROAD
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + V I V
+ + + + + + + + + + + — —
+ + + + + + + + NTS
+ + + + + e,/\_ f 5.0'
_ MIN
PLAN VIEW
DETAIL45 DEGREE
TAPERED BUTT END
LARGE CHANNEL
SPACING
3.0' LI VESTAKE \ \
COIR FIBER in CHANNEL TOP
I.5' OF BANK
—
SMALL CHANNEL MATTING zy \ \ PROPOSED
\/j/\i /j SPACING �\ 4� �� ��� !j COIR FIBER STREAM BED SCOUR POOL
\\\ \, _ 4��`�� ��•'� ` MATTING POOL PLOW MIN. 5.0'
/ / //\ / /\/ / � ``��•'`��''�`� ITOB ® SEE PROFILE FOR
\ / / A/ A. �� / '' A/ •••�� �i•�� "�/�\ POOL DEPTH
\ /A /A /A N N/S ! \ \ O
\/\/\/,� \ • V /V/ / k
�I������•
�N.��••• •������ , BACKFILL WITH COARSE a �` \ \\---7
\ /\/ / / /\/ Ai.** i� II��`�II��`'II�`i��!`.NWS AAGGREGATE iRC /.
(I"TO 5" DIA.) \/\jJ \/
\ \ /
\/\/ / /\/ LI VESTAKE SPACING // /\//\ / //\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\/
/\/\/\/ / LARGE CHANNEL \\ \\\ /�\/\/\/\\/\\/\/� /\\/\ iiiQ N
LI VESTAKE
2.0' � 7 o C)
CV
TYPICAL SECTION O I .0 COIR FIBER GEOTEXTIOLE FABRIC TACK FABRIC O N-WOVEN I— N
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
'• MATTING (NCDOT TYPE II) TO LOG
NOTES: I �`i'•`�•--11 •• �• 0_
O ��❖�•� �0� ;.. TOD SECTION A-A (OPT 2)
I. SEE TABLE ON PLANTING SHEET FOR ACCEPTABLE SPECIES AND COMPOSITION. _�`_I •�`•I •I._
2. LIVE STAKES 2 INCHES IN �� %•• �i•I �• >-
3. LIVE STAKES SHOULD
TOED FEET LONG AND 0.75
.5 ALTERNATING SPOACING ON LARGE METER. •••-'•a�C�❖ •�•` •��❖�:��' COIR MATTING Z
CHANNELS (POOL DEPTH > 2FT) AND I .O' ALTERNATING SPACING ON SMALL ,��•�/``,I`• ``•�1 •�`` O
CHANNELS (POOL DEPTH < 2FT). �•�• �•�• •�•� •�••�••�••�•, 0
4. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ON ALL RESTORATION REACHES AND ALONG ALL � ��`���`����`'���`•_A!`• ._ NWS Z
ENHANCEMENT REACHES AS SHOWN ON LIVE STAKE SHEETS. HEADER LOG HIGH i=
LOW -.4----- ~
LIVE STAKING LIVEST SPACING 11
SMALLLL C CHANNEL
NOTES: LU
NTS I . LOGS SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD 0-
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED 111
2. HIGH SIDE OF LOG SHALL BE APPROX. 0.2' HIGHER 0
FOOTER LOG THAN LOW END LL
3. PROPOSED LOG DIMENSIONS: 11 }
SECTION B-B MIN DIAM. = I 8", MIN LENGTH = I S O Q
NAIL FILTER FABRIC USING 3" I OD GALVANIZED LL
COMMON NAIL EVERY I .5'ALONG THE LOG z 0 Z
O U) 2
() W J
5 J in
LOG SILL w
cc cc ct
45 NTS
0)
crs
N W
(i3 ` C/'
1 \
coV! Z
O Z
w
0 0
co
NEW CHANNEL TO BE O�
CONSTRUCTED y7 H r2
Uj
Q
w H 2
0I — 2"x 2"X 2'WOODEN C— H
I—
STAKE ON 2' CENTERS BANKFULL ELEVATION MIN. 25' C r (n
coco
OLD CHANNEL TO BE 761
�—CHANNEL PLUG GRADE MAX. 75'alSTING J
d- DIVERTED OR ABANDONED O Q
0 SLOPE J
�iI/ i On LLJ
o
/j\/�\\/�\\/\\/ //\` \\�\\//\\//\\/\\'�\\ \ \ z B, / o Ct 0
Q /\� %\�%\\%\�%%\%%�% / �\ ��/\ - NBOTTOM ��\�\� \��\\�\\�% — \\- (n
c) PLAN VIEW %/ / / / AEXISTING CHANNEL \� �� • /� Z
E \� � \\�\\\\�\i�\\-\\�\\�\\�\\i\�\\i\i\\\\\II
Q0
.45 MIIMUM 9" EROSION INSTALL WATTLE N
LLJ
ii UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL PROFILE VIEW 4. ��� w 2 Z w
I .5' MINIMUM
crs BANKFULL ELEVATION COMPACTED BACKFILL J
ci) (I 2"TO 18" LIFTS) < Z i-
NOTES: 1— w 0 O
30' I I . EROSION CONTROL WATTLES OR COIR LOGS/WATTLES MAY BE ' TYPICAL SECTION w w › z
O FINISHED GRADE NEW CHANNEL BANK SHALL USED IN PLACE OF SILT FENCE 0 L.1_
I ��/ \�' '// / // �/ </� �� BE TREATED AS SPECIFIED 2. INSTLL A MINIMUM OF 2 UPSLOPE STAKES AND 4 DOWNSLOPE EXISTING NOTES: fr C� fr
? COMPACTED BACKFILL I `� IN PLANS STAKES AT AN ANGLE TO WEDGE WATTLE IN PLACE CHANNEL I I . IN AREAS WHERE EXISTING CHANNEL IS TO BE ABANDONED, FILL EXISTING CHANNEL TO
(I 2" LIFTS) I
a0i BANKFULL ELEVATION WHEN POSSIBLE.
.p I0' MIN MAINTENANCE:
a �� 2. CHANNEL MUST BE FILLED IN 12"TO I8" LIFTS AND COMPACTED ACCORDINGLY.
3. WHEN SPOIL DOES NOT EXIST IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY FILL EXISTING CHANNEL TO PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
0) I I . INSPECT WATTLE PERIODICALLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT BANKFULL ELEVATION, FILL CHANNEL TO AN ELEVATION 6" ABOVE BANKFULL HEIGHT FOR PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
o RAINFALL EVENT FOR DAMAGE AND SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AT LEAST 25 LF OUT OF EVERY 100 LF SEGMENT. REMAINING CHANNEL SECTIONS ARE
_0 PROPOSED TO BE FILLED TO A DEPTH OF NO LESS THAN 70% OF BANKFULL ELEVATION. DESIGNED: MJG
0_ 2. REPLACE OR CLEAN WATTLE AS NEEDED TO ALLOW WATER TO
_` , -,I. CHANNEL INVERTDRAIN THROUGH THE NATURAL FIBERS BETWEEN RAINFALL EVENTS PLAN VIEW 4. EASEMENT, THE CHANNEIN AREAS WHERE THE ISTING CHANNEL IS LOCATED L MUST BE FILLED COMPLETEOULY NSiDE OFT CONSERVATION DRAWN: TRS
cn CHECKED: AFM
a) IMPERVIOUS SELECT MATERIAL
CC (PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER) TYPICAL SECTION EROSION CONTROL WATTLE CHANNEL ABANDONN/ENT AND BACKFILL SHEET NUMBER:
� OPTIONAL
di TOE PROTECTION
NTS
z
CHANNEL PLUG NTS D2
w
L NTS
.✓ I

C 1 r
NOTES: ores
ANCHOR BOULDER LARGE COBBLE/SMALL
BOULDERS, TYP I . RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES SMALL BE INSTALLED IN NEWLY
4.0' CHANNEL GRADED CHANNEL SECTIONS, AS SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN SHEETS.
4.0 TOP OF BANK
TYP BOTTOM WIDTH 2. ELEVATION CONTROL POINTS SMALL BE DESIGNATED AT THE
NW - �' ► BEGINNING AND END OF RIFFLE POINTS TO ESTABLISH PART OF THE
PER DETAIL MATTING -7J/�����T \-r-`e7��, ����������`7 ��T �/ PROFILE OF THE CHANNEL. SURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE
Flow \��\/\/\/\/\/\/\ �` \� \\ \\ \\ \/\ \/\ \� REQUIRED TO
OFS+OBLISH ACCURATE RIFFLE INSTALLATION WITHIN A 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
\ \ \ /\ / // 3. GRADE CONTROL ROCK SMALL BE COMPRISED OF A 50/50 MIX OF Raleigh, NC 27612
EXCAVATE/GRADE UPPER BANK i i \ C`,`-" Main: 919.829.9909
.Ar \ CLASS A AND B RIPRAP. GRADE CONTROL ROCK SHALL BE PLACED
0.5' MIN \ `�� .i� -
\\/\\��•4•, ► J�•�• PROPOSED TOE OF BANK SUCH THAT THE ADDITION OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS OF RIFFLE WWW.res.us
INSTALL LIVE STAKES //%� �� ���� �� '4�_�a���r r,._10:„0 -a U/ MATERIAL SHALL ACHIEVE THE DESIGNATED GRADES.
1 .o' MIN \ O v`mp• 4.mr► v.•4MR �•�•mrZ+�.�" O�C\ Engineering Services Provided
PER DETAIL o _ o o �� 4. RIFFLE MATERIAL SMALL BE COMPRISED OF ROCKS AND LOGS. THE 9 9 By:
/\/\j \\\\\\\/\\/\/\/\\/\/\\\\\\/ /\/\\\/ \\ EXISTING CHANNEL BANK \/ � �� /\\\ ROCK MATERIAL COMPOSITION SMALL MATCh TABLE I . RIFFLE Angler Environmental, LLC
/\/\/ \j\/ .\j////\/\\///\/\j \ /\ // l //\/\ RIFFLE MATERIAL; MATERIAL SMALL BE EXCAVATED, STOCKPILED, AND RE-USED FROM License: F-1428
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /\7 \/ v / X ABANDONED CHANNEL SECTIONS. ROCK RIFFLE MATERIAL OBTAINED
/�\/\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\ \\• \// /\\//\\//\\ \/\\// //\ \ \ \ \ SEE TABLE I
\\/;�/// / / /\ / " //�/\/�/�///�/\ = .� = = = �, = = = �. = = \ //// \ / OFFSITE SMALL BE SLIGHTLY ROUNDED, "RIVER-TYPE" ROCK, UNLESS SEAL
/\/%///\/////\//\\�� //�/�// // /� •�•��� • • ��•�• = =�- -1 = A //\/Z\//\//` OTHER ROCK CHARACTERISTICS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE CHANNEL.
\/��/ /�\\ \�� // /�// /�� ���I�I�I�I� I.I.�.I�I�• 4" - 6" LOGS 5. SPACING AND NUMBER OF LOGS SHOULD BE BASED ON RIFFLE
\/\/\/ _/\__ \ \ p 4, r . LENGTH AND MAY VARY BASED ON LOG AVAILABILITY. LOGS SHOULD
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE /K\//\/ - �•�• �4•1i• ♦��•�x��S^�•. •�•Z BE SPACED EQUALLY AND ANCHORED TO THE CHANNEL BED WITH
/V /\ /\/\/ / • • • • • 1/V• GRADE CONTROL ROCK
MIN SLOPE 2.OH: I V \//\/\/\//\ \// • �� • • k - CROSS SECTION A-A' 50/50 MIX OF CLASS A AND BOULDERS.
/\/ ., A' -•-•�•!� ��.-.-.. ` •� A
/ / / / / , I.Tifi l y" 4/ 111A, :►4 11.• B RIPRAP G. THE PLACEMENT OF GRADE CONTROL ROCK AND/OR RIFFLE MATERIAL
i� \// \//\//\//\/ \//\//\/ ����j �jI/�1���j�.�.�.���.�.� SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER TO CREATE A SMOOTH PROFILE, WITH
\\/�j\\ \ \j/\ \\\j\\ \/� �'►�'; �O�•'• �•�•�•"• , 11�• NO ABRUPT "JUMP" (TRANSITION) BETWEEN THE UPSTREAM
r i , RIFFLE MATERIAL; )
\`\ \�/j\/\\/\\ � •��•�' g��• �4•4•��4•4•� SEE TABLE I POOL-GLIDE AND THE RIFFLE, AND LIKEWISE NO ABRUPT "DROP"
• • • • �� • •it • (TRANSITION) BETWEEN THE RIFFLE AND THE DOWNSTREAM RUN-POOL.
EXISTING �•• 0�1� • • • • • • ••►• 11�• THE FINISHED CROSS SECTION OF THE RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL
CHANNEL BED • • • • �� • • • •
������������1w• • • �.•-•� GENERALLY MATCh THE SHAPE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE
••► 1"WWI' 111"." �••►•�1 e 4" - 6" LOGS VARIES PER PROFILE
SMALL POOL , . • • . . . . . ., RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME VARIABILITY OF THE THALWEG
BENCH WIDTH VARIES PER -•�•1•-•-•-e., •�•1•�•n•1G�
NOTES: �••►•�1/�•�•�•� �•�•�••►•�16�• BEGIN RIFFLE PROPOSED TOP LOCATION AS A RESULT OF THE SMALL POOLS AND LOGS.
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER : • .., •�' �: �. ;, • or • •, = CONTROL POINT 7. THE END OF RIFFLE CONTROL POINT MAY TIE IN TO ANOTHER
(MIN WIDTH OF 8' - 10'TYPICAL) �• •��� ���•� - ���� OF BANK
�•mopore a.door••• - .•my••►••�1/my• IN-STREAM STRUCTURE (LOG SILL , J-HOOK, ETC.). NO LOGS SHOULD
I . SEED AND MULCH ALL BANKS PRIOR TO INSTALLING a
COIR MATTING -��•i -•-•4►•-�` � � �•� BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE.
..••►•�•4.•.•.•�• , ••J•�11�• 8. THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SHALL BE KEYED IN TO THE STREAM BANKS
ice/ • • • 1� *,, .4 • " FLOW
���������������������, ������ END RIFFLE CONTROL POINT „
iipt►•�11►r•rerej_`aakI - ►•�11r• AND/OR BED AS DESIGNATED BY THE DESIGNER. THE KEY SMALL
�� �• ' GLIDE
�� .� .� .� .���� � �,� J' ��,��,� EXTEND BEYOND THE TOP OF BANK FOR THE LENGTH OF THE RIFFLE.
LARGE COBBLE/ .� �, t , - - ♦ •' __ RUN
• ' • • • 4 �a•o•:►•�Y1�• POOL �� - r �� WHERE PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM BANK VEGETATION IS A
SMALL BOULDERS • al • • • • • • • �_0. �4 V•11_d1�Jld[h_ha „
•mrel7•.•-•-•-�w 16• �-•-• •- Y�` z•.=� POOL PRIORITY A KEY MAY NOT BE USED (OR THE DIMENSIONS MAY BE
., . . . ,. . . . . . . l ) R 41RA �I ADJUSTED) TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE.
,1111 ��• • •,•-., f0, 1••�1/.• \ \\\ //\\/\\/^ \ �/ \ \\ �' C7 \ �\'
-YP I C A L BANK GRADING 14• •141* A; ������.•�-• /\//\// /\/\/\ \ \/\/\/\j\
_••►•_1.-•-. . .-•-•-••►• 11-• / //\//\ \ / //\
•
NTS �a�.i�.�1,%,' ��.4�,�'y.' .4.� \\ \� /\ // //. //.
• • - - O • < •
.• '71.1K•�>, ••!�•�•�4 '•�11�• 4" 6" LOGS GRADE CONTROL ROCK
!AtU'�•r -Ag.MP ft• ,�o��� 50/50 MIX OF CLASS A AND
�� •1 V� • 4*
• • B RIPRAP
���`i •�ii��i�ir�-�-�-��.-�- PROFILE
ANCHOR BOULDER 01� '��•�'��e.•�•�•'►�•�110•
g'VIM rj.4,
TABLE I - STONE COMPOSITION 1- o
REACH STONE SIZE % 0• N
0 0
N
NOTES: I-• N
FFI B, FFI -D #3 50
I . OVER EXCAVATE THE OUTSIDE BEND OF THE CHANNEL. PLACE LARGER BRANCHES AND LOGS IN A CRISS-CROSS PATTERN. LOCK IN PLACE •I PPLE GRADE CONTROL FF4-B, FF3 SURGE 50
WITH FILL COVERING 6 IN TO 12 IN OF THE LARGER BRANCHES/SMALL LOGS.
2. PLACE SMALLER BRANCHES AND BRUSH OVER THE LARGER BRANCHES/SMALL LOGS (HARDWOOD SPECIES ONLY) AND COMPACT LIGHTLY NTS A 30
TOGETHER. BACKFILL AND COMPACT TO LOCK IN PLACE. FF5 B B 30 J
3. PLACE LIVE CUTTINGS OVER THE SMALL BRANCHES AND BRUSH. SEE TABLE ON PLANTING SHEET FOR ACCEPTABLE LIVE CUTTING AND LIVE
STAKE SPECIES AND COMPOSITION. CUTTINGS SHOULD BE RINSED AT CUTTING POINT TO ALLOW BETTER ROOTING. SURGE 40 Z
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL(COIR) MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. COIR MATTING SHOULD BE KEYED INTO 0
TOP OF BANK. Ur
5. INSTALL I TO 3 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ABOVE THE LIVE CUTTINGS LAYER PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. Z
6. LIVE CUTTINGS SHOULD NOT EXTEND PAST/3 OF CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH.
I-
2
1rI
INSTALL COIR MATTING PER DETAIL in
Q_
SEE DWG D I
0
FLOW
KEY COI NTOA TANG COMPACTED SOIL LIFT 0
LL
MIN 2.0' CE }
LIVE STAKES LL 0 Q
\M,
r� Z 0 Z
\/ ` 1TOODANK
LARGE COBBLE/SMALL U)
//\\\\\ / ` LIVE CUTTINGS BOULDERS, TYP NOTES: LU
C LU J in/// A \ SMALL BRANCHES /\ ‘ I CHANNEL 7-TOP OF BANK I I . TYPICAL RIFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL NEWLY GRADED CHANNEL a
\ \ - AND BRUSH \ BOTTOM WIDTH SECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
/ - - - . _ =:j 0 // //\/ �' 1r�• = c= . = y ON PLAN SHEETS.
ro 1/4 MAX POOL DEPTH \\\1 t�- ` _ \ (1!�•q.•�•zbi?, / / / / / / / / / / POINTS SMALL BE\ - -�- - / / \ '`: - ��C �' \\/\/\/\/\ \ /\/\/\/ /\/ 2.
ELEVATION
AND ENDLOFF RIFFLE POINTS TO DESIGNATED AT ThE PART OF THE in
\/ Fil f �•Wit! �i �=�i / / / �
( 0 \ \ = n�� = : ,fir ��` / / / / �\ / PROFILE OF THE CHANNEL. SURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE I-
I/4 MAX POOL DEPTH / /�/ / / / ,411s.��y� i, \ \ �\ \ \ \\ \\ ' REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH ACCURATE RIFFLE INSTALLATION WITHIN A - Q
r / / �� / / / / / / • ' �� C%1c 4110 \ \ '�' \ / TOLERANCE OF +0.2'. U) Z
m / T T \\ A' ��C�1...*�� or A 0.75' MIN K\/\/\/\ t-j Sw li - '.__, \ \ \ \ 3. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPRISED OF 75% ROCKS AND 25%
�// / \ / / \ \//\/ / y ri \/\/\/ -�Yc1� '- //\ \\/ WOODY MATERIAL. WOODY MATERIAL SMALL CONSIST OF LOGS, Z J
0 0
< \ /\\ \ \ \ \ \ �'ta�t= �-�(j �-y • '�" / v/ / BRANCHES, AND BRUSH NO GREATER THAN 3" IN DIAMETER. THE
SMALL LOGS AND/OR /\/j\//\ \ \ /\ / / ��•����j �7`:� �•�� \/\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ PROPOSED ROCK MATERIAL SMALL CONSIST OF NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL r
LARGE BRANCHES WITH A >•. .�`�!�. Ir`%V"���y / / TOE OF BANK
MIN DIAMETER OF 4" MIN t•�� o(il � . / / \ WHEN POSSIBLE. NATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE EXCAVATED, Q Q
��•� .� - \j\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\ STOCKPILED, AND RE-USED FROM ABANDONED CHANNEL SECTIONS. IF U
TOE PROTECTION •-•-4 1-�4-6t ; /\/,//\ / V
Q (LARGER CHANNELS) ••�•�•• ? �i�z•�•�� //j�/////�// A SUITABLE QUANTITY OF NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL CANNOT BE
\ RIFFLE MATERIAL;
L '.44 1Peill,•1����•�2 HARVESTED, CONTRACTOR MAY SUBSTITUTE THE RIFFLE MATERIAL
��� l L '�� +� -7 SEE TABLE
•wrA:kie11I •w1�,, WITH ROCK MATCHING THE COMPOSITION IN TABLE I I . C_ SECTION A A A 4.**4` orb[! l�.�l� �7 4. THE PLACEMENT OF RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER TO G r (!)
1 ® Io Asans1 • • • • CROSS SECTION A-A' CREATE A SMOOTH PROFILE, WITH NO ABRUPT "JUMP" (TRANSITION) J
Co I ►�aks&or•�1 �•�7?ror•er� BETWEEN THE UPSTREAM POOL GLIDE AND THE RIFFLE, AND LIKEWISE Z
o i ...4.17.
'�41 4100 0` •1 NO ABRUPT "DROP" (TRANSITION) BETWEEN THE RIFFLE AND THE <
0441:0II-u,,, a�„II1 ) I-
0 ►•�lfI'�•►may•••'•r,! DOWNSTREAM RUN-POOL. THE FINISHED CROSS SECTION OF THE W
t\ i• ��. •:,1•���� • �• 1�:�.
o ' /� `I �� LARGE COBBLE/ prwa,-,,,,.."...„..-!zo.s4r7,•Ay;� � RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL GENERALLY MATCH THE SHAPE AND W,, COIR MATTING k�flifit. , H 0
'''�►�1���,���l�:,,/� '�� SMALL BOULDERS �• • z ►. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME
U V r1, 4. /7A� 44%i �'.o ���'•�t. `I, G• •..1..,,wno.. +mac •1� 4 VARIABILITY OF THE THALWEG LOCATION AS A RESULT OF THE SMALL Z
`n %i►� ;',yA AiLlj►V,,, c & , C � �� ��, ,,o I �� �% IMOM POOLS AND LOGS. D
E '►= �3,1.4 1�ia0,• i ��`������ r BEGIN RIFFLE PROPOSED TOP<� � >> Y� =_' r�.��`��1,��.€,A, • VARIES PER PROFILE 5. THE END OF RIFFLE CONTROL POINT MAY TIE IN TO ANOTHER Qt��\+;v4// ��"%: *. �2F' � J� v� //��.r , 1'•(�.,�w, � OF BANK�r.yj \,�. '.; .,, •�� >�,�,, -���� . +\i' ��1,,_ - c- -7gm,41 CONTROL POINT IN-STREAM STRUCTURE (LOG SILL , J-HOOK, ETC.). NO LOGS SHOULD (n
a� ►� 4 d V����' • .` to.. ,• �� BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. 0
CHANNEL TOP 41� W ♦� A . N �, i^
T OF BANK �������� ��.��� s�,�•���•�•��• I •� RIFFLE MATERIAL; W
Y �. SEE TABLE I END RIFFLE
��., � CC
CONTROL POINT G Z
�� - cw• • •- di W
iiri
w fewOwl`r�o0o0o GLIDE Z 0
.Z•n:��•�•:•�;;rs•� FLOW RUN W
�_����, NI, _ _ _ U W Q Z
U 92 �o - ` 'jam '~rr4e*b
POOL LLJ 0=
0 POOL �� �` _: ' .- O Q
z
cc 0
A \//\/ / / \/\ TABLE I - STONE COMPOSITION 0 0
o OF BANK CHANNEL BOTTOM /
/\\//\\//,/ ///\//\//\//j//j//j\ A // REACH I STONE SIZE %
a
/ #3 25 PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
0) MAx 2"-3" FF I -B, FF I -D
a BRANCHES FF4 B, FF3 NATIVE 25 PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW DESIGNED: MJG
0
/
PROFILE SURGE 50
A 50 DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
o) FF5-15 NATIVE 25
cC SURGE 25 SHEET NUMBER:
6E
di
BRUSH TOE
-YPICAL .RIFFLE D3
z NTS
Jw NTS
_
L_
J I

r 1 / 1
TOP OF BANK
Pres
RIP RAP APPROACH TOE OF BANK
(5' MIN) TIMBER MAT CROSSING TIMBER MAT APPROACH
3' MAXIMUM STREAM CHANNEL
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD • BANK HEIGHT 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR liji Ilikli 1 ICI
iv % 1 SEDIMENT RAIL Raleigh, NC 27612
1 "'i di, ii MIN HEIGHT = 4"
TIMBER MATINSTALLED Main: 919.829.9909
,, 4, I+mi`l• II 1 II 1 / 1 4 SURFACE FLOW FLOW PARALLEL
\ --\ www.res.us
_�, 1 I ilk,
�-, ��s II+� 1 �� II A i I d+ DIVERSION
IMI CLASS B RIP RAP
2" I' 0° . 00 , • "// i1 IliI Engineering Services Provided By:
I11l1 Ill °7°°� a o _ _ Angler Environmental, LLC
1:=11.=11 11.=11.=1 :-10IIr I' 11.=11:=1 -1 '.11=a -11=11=11 , /°0° a a 4 ° A '� °o _Th �/j�/.� �_. �_.
11.=11. ?11:=11.=11- 11'=11.=1 1'=11=11 11=;11.=L 11.=11=11= yt- I 11 11\ • Q _ 1���/ � License: F 1428
I�II:�IIF 11:=11:=1 ll�ll#n 'll*ll*l 7 11 t�II:�II:�II� "' l %11.=11.=11 '.11:=11.. :11=11=11:'�/1=11=11. II: 11:=1L 11. 11II= hi 1 1 \A\v - SEAL
1 .11.111.1�,111.111.11 :111111.1111.--111 1=1.1111.--1.1111 11:1A.11=11 II ILII II OP / / �� 11100000
/.0 i�
iiiiiii : ii�1 � " 1 " ',lilt I Ii� t 1 1 ,
I I. INSERT 2. REMOVE 3. INSERT I i
y •V.
.r d
PLANTING BAR AS PLANTING BAR PLANTING BAR 2 II I40•,,/c '
/ate /ate
SHOWN AND PULL AND PLACE INCHES TOWARD STONE APPROACH •1�•1f
HANDLE TOWARD SEEDING AT PLANTER FROM / / SECTION: NO STEEPERPI i�%•:••` >� » >£ CARRIAGE BOLT
PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH. SEEDING. /ao /ao
THAN 5: I SLOPE ON ROAD r �-
CLASS ASTONE OVER o- /.p♦/<
FILTER FABRIC r er .. ° ° [1 1111
co: ® ff
• 01.
SURFACE FLOW /a0 /a
DIVERSION et. A
NIu= 1. 0, 11:"u=II.= Ii -u=i=Il=i1= I= n=it=u=11= TIMBER MAT
II II= 11=11=11 h 11=11F:':11-11.=11E 11 :11=11=11=11
EI_I:11�I II t1_1111111'11:11 II:II 1111:11:11:i1�1:11:�1:11E 1I II:1I:II$;:IL1171:11L
1_l: IL�:11.=11.=11•= 11= .:11=11-11=11= I= 11=11 11=11= EXISTING STREAMBANK
II- 1i=11=11=11 11.=11:=11=.11=11=.11E 11 =11=11=11=11 �„ ■
111:=11:-11:=11.=11.=11:= 11=i .11=11=11=11= 1'=11=11=11=11=11=
11.=11..11..11..11..11 E.11 11=11.=11.=11:SIII .11: .11.=11.=W11. , I ` 's ' i' �i TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR NOTES:
4. PULL HANDLE OF 5. PUSH 6. LEAVE
BAR TOWARD HANDLE COMPACTION I I . TIMBER MATS SHALL BE USED FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
PLANTER, FIRMING FORWARD HOLE OPEN. PLAN VIEW TO TRAVERSE WET AND/OR MUDDY ARES ADJACENT TO THE STREAM AND
SOIL AT BOTTOM. FIRMING SOIL WATER
AT TOP. THOROUGHLY. CLASS A STONE TO CROSS THE STREAM AND OTHER CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS.
SEDIMENT RAIL 2. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A DRY CONDITION WHEN
FILTER FABRIC MIN HEIGHT = 4" FLOW IS LOW. THERE SHALL BE MINIMAL TO NO DISTURBANCE OF THE
NOTES: CARRIAGE BOLT TIMBER MAT INSTALLED CHANNEL BED AND BANKS AS A RESULT OF INSTALLING THE APPROACHES
� , �P) PERPENDICULAR OR CROSSING.
PLANTING NOTES: NOTES:
I I. CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS LOW. TIMBER MAT
BARE ROOTS SHALL BE PLANTED 6 CLASS B RIP RAP 3. THE LENGTH OF TIMBER MAT REQUIRED TO CROSS THE STREAM OR
PLANTING BAG 2. HAVE ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON-SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. TOP OF BANK INSTALLED PARALLEL
DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL T. TO I 0 T. ON CENTER, 3. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE W i` CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE TIMBER MAT
BE KEPT IN A MOIST CANVAS BAG OK RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8 CHANNEL BOTTOM. COMPLETE ONE SIDE BEFORE STARTING ON THE OTHER SIDE. ��' EXTENDS PAST THE TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING A
SIMILAR CONTAINER TO PREVENT THE �' FT. ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 4. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW. -.Op/.•D. a 0 0 0 O •••• •••••• SUFFICIENT DISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE MAXIMUM EQUIPMENT SIZE USING
ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING. 680 PLANTS PER ACRE. 5. GRADE SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 5: I }� /\%\y �/ �/ / �y �/ V\y\% THE CROSSING.
KBC PLANTING BAR 6. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT /�//�//�//�//\///\///\ \ // /j/ / //\//\//\�//\�/�/ //j//\//�\/�\/\/ 4. STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER MAT LENGTHS ELI
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A BLADE ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL. /\\/\ \\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\�-/ / / / / / / \ �\��/�/� /' O
AND VVITHSHAL TRIANGULAR
12 INCHES LONG, 4 7 FILTER,FABRIC S. A STABILIZED HALL BE USED OF LOVER THE CLASS A S EQRM AND QACC SS SLOPES.9 INCHES LINED WITH //\//\////\/\/\/\//�//�\// /\j\j\j\\ j\/ / / / / \ \//\�/ ORIENTED
STREAMRAPPROACH APENDICULAR PPROACHES SHALLBE INSTALLED THE P WI THS OF THE STREAME
TIMBER MAT TIMBER a o
INCHES WIDE AND I INCH THICK AT 8. FILTER FABRIC USED SHALL BE NCDOT TYPE 2 ENGINEERING FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT. /\/\/\ \�\�\�\�\�\�\�\ `\�`\��\��\�\\/\\\//\/\/\/\/\//\\A\ LENGTHS ORIENTED PARALLEL TO THE TOPS OF THE STREAM BANKS. I- N
CENTER. 9. WIDTH OF THE CROSSING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT(8' MIN.)TO ACCOMMODATE THE �� �\�/\\�\\/' 0
LARGEST VEHICLE CROSSING THE CHANNEL. FILTER FABRIC �// 5. TIMBER MATS SHALL HAVE A SOLID DECK WITH NO GAPS OR SPACES J
ROOT PRUNING I O. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING TO TOE OF BANK ALLOWED BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL BOARDS/TIMBERS.
ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT cr P) APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW
PRUNED, IF NECESSARY, SO THAT NO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED. WATER SURFACE
ROOTS EXTEND MORE THAN I O I I. TEMPORARY CROSSINGS ARE TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE. 6. A 4" MINIMUM HEIGHT SEDIMENT RAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED AT STREAM
INCHES BELOW THE ROOT COLLAR. CROSSINGS TO PREVENT TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM FALLING INTO THE }
11 STREAM BED.
Z
SECTION VIEW 7. STREAM CROSSING APPROACHES FROM DRY AREAS SHALL BE 0
CONSTRUCTED USING CLASS B RIP RAP PLACED OVER FILTER FABRIC. (0
BASE .00T PLANTING POND CO55I NG 8. ALL TIMBER MATS, FILTER FABRIC, AND RIP RAP SHALL BE COMPLETELY
NTS NTS REMOVED FROM THE SITE WHEN THE CROSSING IS REMOVED. I-
rY
W
o_
TIN/BE MAT TEN/PORAY CROSSING rI
0
NTS LL
•
0 IY
LL Q
Z 0 Z
w -
0 v) 2
() W
5 _1 W
STREAM BANK NOTES: W W rI
CC CC 0-
BANKFULL
45 COARSE AGGREGATE I . SEE STRUCTURE BOULDER SIZE TABLE FOR MINIMUM DIMENSIONS
o) BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) OF BOULDERS. ThE UPPER LIMIT FOR BOULDER SIZES SHOULD BE
`rJcci ->> NO MORE ThAT 20% OF ThE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SIZE AND SMALL/ W
F \\\\\ BANKFULL BE APPROVED BY ThE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE
/ // HEADER BOULDER
H /\\/\ COARSE AGGREGATE STRUCTURE. Q
✓ //\//\ BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) LEFT OR RIGHT VANE ARM 2. COARSE AGGREGATE BACKFILL SMALL CONSIST OF AN EQUAL MIX (/) z
m TOE OF BANK FLOW STREAM BANK \j�/ ...P, G� ,�5.�� FOOTER BOULDER BANK INTERCEPT OF#57 STONE, SURGE STONE, AND CLASS A RIPRAP. -
W TOE OF BANK / / N CONTROL POINT Z J
/\ V'440. j;ji..� 3. BOULDERS AT TOE SMALL BE INSTALLED SLIGHTLY HIGHER ThAN
Q O110102411, i STREAM BED FlowP (APPROX. O. I ') IN ORDER TO PROMOTE LOW FLOW INTO CENTER OF 0_ 0
BANKFULL \ /\ \/\/\, VARIES CHANNEL.
;�/ /\\j/\j \ IN POOL 0'TO 0.8
\/\/\/\ \\/\\/\\/\\ �- 4. CROSS VANES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO ThAT ADJOINING U
J % CHANNEL % CHANNEL % CHANNEL FILTER FABRIC \//j//\/ //\//\//\//\ 3°IoTO 5°Io , BOULDERS TAPER IN AN UPSTREAM DIRECTION, FROM ThE fry
WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH \�\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\/\\' T /�/>�// � - BANKFULL ELEVATION TO THE STREAM INVERT. THE UPSTREAM END V
w COARSE AGGREGATE VARIES / \/// // // // // // //�� \//\\/\\/\\//\\ � � `t� --/\ Flow OF THE CROSS VANE IS SET AT AN ANGLE OF 20 TO 30 DEGREES
CI BACKFILL(SEE NOTE#2) CROSS VANE INVERT 0'TO WIDTH \/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\� \/.,\/\\/\\�_ .�i��i�� � __ - \/\\, \\_ TANGENT TO THE PROJECTED STREAM BANK DIRECTION. ThE TOP - I-
= I I •
CONTROL POINT //\//.\//.�//\/A /
ii I I /\/\\\//\\\ / POOL j\�j\�j\\j/\\// OF THEIO� OF BOTH VANES WILL DECREASE TOWARD THE CENTER 2 r: J
SECTION A-A' FOOTER ROCK /x\��\\\77777-/ \j/\\\j/\\\j\\j/\\\\\��\\�\\�/`/ 5. THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE CROSS VANE SHALL BE KEYED 0
o INTO ThE STREAMBANK AT ThE BANKFULL ELEVATION. ThE CROSS < Z Q
O ,- .- 4... i•.�✓..� HEADER ROCK VANE SMALL BE KEYED A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET INTO ThE -, I-
20°TO 30° IJ;/•//•//••i•/ W
�- ,,,- ',�- 40,4_4.,.- ', MIN STREAMBANK. THE UPSTREAM END OF CROSS VANE SHALL BE W
o re:Ore.."Wit. ;� 5 0' PROFILE VIEWra p , % ' KEYED INTO THE STREAMBANK AT ThE DESIGNED STREAMBED I- 0
•� ii.��
U 1114154
7• /`I INVERT ELEVATION. z
'Cif �� 6. VANE BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED IN A LINEAR FASHION SO AS 1t et HEADER AND FOOTER A CHANNEL % CHANNEL A CHANNEL D
RIGHT VANE ARM • .�•, WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH TO PRODUCE THE SLOPING CROSS VANE, AND SMALL BE PLACEDQO
10
- i•• BOULDERS
ii BANK INTERCEPT O ~� '����• WITH TIGhT, CONTINUOUS SURFACE CONTACT BETWEEN ADJOINING
CONTROL POINT *O Ate VANE ARM BANK BOULDER. BOULDER SMALL BE PLACE SO AS TO HAVE NO Cl) 0
.45 VANE ARM BANK W
T .•/~�� �/r�•/: FILTER FABRIC INTERCEPT CONTROL INTERCEPT CONTROL may/ SIGNIFICANT GAPS BETWEEN ADJOINING BOULDER. C Z
L, •.- 'fm- ;ore A POINT POINT � \/ 7. VANE BOULDERS SMALL BE PLACED SO AS TO HAVE A FINAL W G Li
ca • fet9 Y. 1�: X SMOOTH SURFACE ALONG THE TOP PLANE OF THE CROSS VANE. Q H
���/' �;/�� Z NO VANE BOULDER SHALL PROTRUDE HIGH ER THAN THE OTHER Z Z in 0
,� 4�s I I �\j�\\\ \\/\\�\\ ��".4+.•........�� '� BOULDER IN THE BOULDER VANE. A COMPLETED CROSS VANE HAS U < Z
2 POOL /,//• K ) -/\/i�/ Y ;%�;�;:;%�;:;;:%�;:;:;;:,• A SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS FINISH GRADE FROM ThE BANKFULL W W
O B I I B `- --'` -r� '`--k--' `. •�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•.x.:.. ELEVATION TO THE STREAMBED. 0r OTC
zU MIN Is is- s'�"�.t. STRUCTURE MINIMUM BOULDER SIZE 8. AS THE CROSS VANE IS CONSTRUCTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL O
5.0' 111P
r-- CHINK ALL VOIDS BETWEEN ThE FOOTER BOULDERS, AND BETWEEN 0_ 0
o LEFT VANE ARM REACH DIMENSION LENTGH (IN.) ThE FOOTER BOULDERS AND VANE BOULDERS. VOIDS SMALL BE
°� BANK INTERCEPT FILTER CHINKED WITH SMALLER ROCK SUCH ThAT NO VOIDS GREATER
-
.o FABRIC -' X 24
a CONTROL POINT`� HEADER BOULDER FF3, FF5 Y 18 ThAN FOUR INCHES IN SIZE WILL BE PRESENT. PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
0) 3 PRIMARY ROCK DIMENSIONS: Z 18 PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
aPLAN VIEW FOOTER BOULDER X 36 DESIGNED: MJG
o X. LONGEST DIMENSION
-o SECTION B-B' Y. SHORTEST DIMENSION FF I B, FF I -D Y 24DRAWN: TRS
FF4-BZ. INTERMEDIATE DIMENSION Z 24 CHECKED: AFM
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
Ed
. OCK CROSS VANE D4
w
J NTS
LI

C. 1 r 1
Ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
NOTES: Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
SELECT BACKFILL HEADER BOULDER I . BOULDERS FOR THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MUST BE A MIN. OF I -2TN BOULDER WITH A MIN. DIAMETER OF 2-3FT. www.res.us
MATERIAL PT INVERT ELEVATION
2. THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS UNLESS Engineering Services Provided By:
STREAMBED OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Angler Environmental, LLC
:• License: F 1428
i V � MAX DEPTH 2 OF 3. HEADER BOULDERS ARE THE TOP MOST BOULDERS USED IN EACH STRUCTURE. HEADER BOULDERS FOR THIS
NON WOVEN GEOTEXTILE =:= ROCK DIAMETER (TYP) STRUCTURE ARE ONLY VISIBLE BETWEEN THE INNER BERMS. SEAL
MAX. ALLOWABLE DROP
FABRIC OPTIONAL (TYP.) VW4111VW11 - ACROSS EACH ROCK
—1/4t1/=0 4. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM OF THE FOOTER BOULDERS. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL
�� ��0, 0.4 ft BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE HEADER BOULDERS.
1
PT OOL ER /=� — DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE 5. SET INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. INVERTS AND ELEVATIONS WILL BE PROVIDED
• ELEVATION TO THE CONTRACTOR AS A 2014 FORMAT DWG FILE. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE ARMS MAY
to.:
VARY FROM THE PLAN LOCATIONS WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER.
. ..- G. THE DROP IN ELEVATION ACROSS THE STRUCTURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5FT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE
FOOTER ENGINEER.
BOULDER 7. MINI-VANES WILL BE SPACED IN THE RIFFLE AS A FUNCTION OF THE RIFFLE LENGTH.
NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC OPTIONAL (TYP.) PC
8. THE MOST UPSTREAM RIFFLE MINI-VANE ARM SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THE BANK TIE-IN IS ON THE SAME SIDE
AS THE NEXT UPSTREAM OUTSIDE BEND IN ORDER TO SERVE AS A VANE AND HELP DIRECT STREAM FLOW AWAY
SECTION G-G' FROM THE PREVIOUS OUTSIDE BEND. LOCATION OF ALL RIFFLE VANE ARMS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS.
9. THE MOST DOWNSTREAM MINI-VANE ARM SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THE HIGH POINT IS ON THE SAME SIDE AS
THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM OUTSIDE BEND IN ORDER TO HELP DIRECT STREAM FLOW FROM THE NEXT OUTSIDE BEND.
10. THE VERTICAL SLOPE OF EACH MINI-VANE ARM SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 0% UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER. THE SLOPES WILL BE DICTATED BY THE WIDTH-TO-DEPTH RATIO OF THE REACH, TYPICAL RIFFLE INNER
/Z.- \ ,
BERM CHANNEL, VERTICAL DROP OVER THE LOG, AND LOG DIAMETER.
1 1 . ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 21N BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL BE HAND CHINKED WITH
COBBLE AND GRAVEL ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE GEOTEXTILE. ALL CHINKING SHALL BE
POINT BAR "G) HEADER BOULDER INVERT KOCK APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE THE MINI-VANES ARE BACKFILLED.
SILL
j 1 2. THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE FIRST AND LAST MINI-VANE ARM REQUIRE A LAYER OF NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC iij
THAT SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN IN THE GEOTEXTILE PLACEMENT DETAIL THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE MINI-VANE. Q N
BAN KFULL —\ 0 N
30-40° ANGLE 13. BACKFILL VANES WITH SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL AS SHOWN AND DEFINED IN THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE DETAIL. I- N
BAN KFULL INNER BERM
� 10% �• ��1����������� 1 4. SELECT BACKFILL AND SOIL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE
�A�A�A•��e. 4 4 `� MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
411141111 s A0AYYA Y1YaY AV VA
�������� ������ v. ����������������������������� 1 5. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE��������������������� t,isiAs---7
� A WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF
����������������������������������������� �. 4 ������������������������������������������. FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS S h ALL B E W I T h I N O. 1 FT O F THE E GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED, PROVIDED O
f ���������������������������������������������������������� �� ��������������������������������������� ANY HEIGHT DOES NOT EXCEED MAX. ALLOWABLE DROP OF 0.5 FT FOR THIS STRUCTURE. Z
fi 4 �� OVERLAP OF 1 G. RE DRESSING OF ChANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION H
DOWNSTREAM ROCK OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
7,110.11"
f (MINIMUM I .OFT W
I _ 44 44' DIAMETER) 1 7. FOOTER DEPTH ON ALL STRUCTURES REQUIRING FOOTERS SHALL BE G TIMES GREATER THAN THE DROP BETWEEN 0_
cZ cZ I THE STRUCTURE AND THE FOOTERED STRUCTURE DIRECTLY UPSTREAM. O
SECTION H-H' U_
s 18. THE DEPARTURE ANGLE SHOWN ABOVE IS DEPICTED IN SUCH A WAY TO EMPHASIZE DETAIL. ACTUAL DEPARTURE
CD z I BOULDER ANGLE SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS.131
447-- 1 ,
_1 iSILL LL 11
44,
J MIN. 4FT Z a z
LLoz
i irr: S' r j O Q
, ••'-' ,„„:-• . 1 .
E z filipes, CT)
Q WCC W rI
lir
will", LLJ
ro ,
f
Q
w I 7LI f r, 0
,;r. ,
e• IZ 0 J
r1 4._W':1 '-':.
.:_i'l::7 '
VW ,
,. . . . ,, ,„ 0 y'�.� '�•! :) \e 4i
• k.,:..,,yR�A'1 r'', . . L Ili
cri . 4 441. TIE INTO -- a^ ra,
J , ^ _ -- V V
Q BANK 4 FEET _ - _
w f _ H
0 44114% . .....
co i 1 TOP OF �- - �: '• 0 J_
0
INNER BERM ,. .��. `_ ";,;
o
1
E BOULDER - =:�
SILL - 1 ..,. - - Q O
MIN. 4FT J - �_ U
.42
s a. _ di z di
N. Via- '. . _ Z in
z 0
w Ln�1J// Q z
92 0 -
U
PLAN VIEW 0 0
U
N
O
a PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
0 DECONSTRUCTED BOULDER •IftLE DESIGNED: MJG
Q
2 NOT TO SCALE DRAWN: TRS
CHECKED: AFM
u)
cc SHEET NUMBER:
L
di
Q
D5
z
J
L_
J \ 1

C "N r
LOG BURIED
IN STREAM
0 res
BANK �i� VANE LENGTH
ow-
BANKFULL OFFSET FROM LOG BURIED
TOP OF BANK IN STREAM BANK 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
_ MIN. 5FT _ Raleigh, NC 27612
j \/\/ 1 , 1/2 MAX DEPTH OF NEAREST Main: 919.829.9909
RIFFLE
\ � www.res.us
\ \ \
j/ /j •
INVERT j
2-4% STREAM BED Engineering Services Provided By:
j\\j\ \�\ �� THALWEG Angler Environmental, LLC
\/\\/\\ I/ ELEVATION License: F-1428
SEAL
�/// /\/\//\//\ <
/ / � / \ \ BOWL OUT BANK BANKFULL
/\/ *) \ Iistaillr \// / BEHIND STRUCTURE ELEVATION
—AN \ /
/// / /\//\/ i'V HEADER LOG �� // // �
\\ \\ \\ \/\\ ./ /j /\\\\\ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ / / /\ \ \� LL WITH
\/\/ // / \/\�/�` �/ FOOTER LOG / ;V\ . �/. /./z/./z/.//. \ �� / /\/\/ \�
/ i / / / �. -- MATERIAL
j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\/ /\\/ /\\/ /\\ \\/1 Hj ADE R BO j LDE R (H 00 K) /y\ \\\\\\\\\\\\�� ~ \\\\ \\\\ �_ \\
• •� ( RO K SI L ROCK SILL
/ . / i / i / i / i / i / •• /
\ FOOTER BOULDER (HOOK) / I4I:I o 1 // \ /\
\ \<//\<//K//\<//\<//< \
/ /// /' o) / LOGS TO BEN
SECTION A—A' HEADER LOG \ \/, /// CHINKEDj
/ / / /4 / WITH WOOD, //
/
NON-WOVEN \ / / /\/\/ GRAVEL AND j//\ COBLE j
GEO / /\ / /\ /\\\/ . /FABRIC /\ /\\/ /\\/\\/\\/\ / /\\/\\/\ /\ /\ \/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\)
TEXTI LE FOOTER LOG STREAM BED
Q, THALWEG
ELEVATION
,
4,za SECTION C—C'
J �
Ed
0Q, iri
I- o
Nco NOTES: 0 N
N
h00 \ BANKFULL I . LOGS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 24-IN AND MINIMUM LENGTH OF 40 FT. OJ
4b - SELECT �NGT 2. ALL LOGS SHALL BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT AND LIMBS SHALL BE TRIMMED FLUSH.
11F/NIIII0 BACKFILL
MATERIAL }
3. FOOTER LOGS/BOULDERS ARE LOGS/BOULDERS PLACED TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION AND SCOUR
PROTECTION FOR THE HEADER LOGS/BOULDERS. Z
HEADER BOULDERS O
0/ 4. HEADER LOGS/BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER LOGS/BOULDERS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED Z
FOOTER BOULDERS BY THE ENGINEER.
H
G 4 5. HEADER LOGS ARE THE TOP MOST LOGS USED IN EACH LOG STRUCTURE. ALL HEADER LOGS CAN BE SEEN fl
FOOTER LOG %IIIPARTIALLY PROTRUDING FROM THE WATER SURFACE DURING EXTREMELY LOW FLOWS. LU
., G. HEADER LOGS SHALL BE OFFSET SLIGHTLY DOWNSTREAM OF THE FOOTING LOGS WHERE SCOUR POOLS fl
0
� 20°-30° r
ARE ANTICIPATED TO FORM AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. LL
ki ji o= >-
7 7. SILL LOGS SHALL BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE BANKFULL FLOW DIRECTION. 0 Q
BOWL-OUT pt , HEADER LOG C U) p Z
BANK 8. THE FOOTER LOGS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE SILL LOG TO THE END OF THE HEADER LOG TOWARD THE 0 U) 2
iri
BANK. (7)Li w u
W
9. HOOK BOULDERS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE HEADER LOG TO BEYOND BANKFULL WIDTH. Q_
a5
� 1 0. SETINVERTSATELEVATION SHOWNON THE PLANANDPROFILE SHEETS. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE LOG
J DROPS STRUCTURE MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN LOCATIONS WITHOUT DIRECTIONS FROM THE ENGINEER. WY 41* F-NON WOVEN I I . HEADER LOG SHALL TIE INTO THE STREAM BANK AT A MINIMUM ELEVATION OF 1/4 DMAX (MEASURED AT zoGEOTEXTILE �� "4,
6' THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE) BELOW BANKFULL ELEVATION AND A MINIMUM ELEVATION OF 1/2 DMAX _
w FABRIC SCOUR (MEASURED AT THE NEXT DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE) BELOW BANKFULL ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE Z J
POOL DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 0 0
co I441r LIVE STAKES � r
(TYP., A .) 12. CUTTING OF THE SILL LOG ROOTWAD MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT THE ROOTWAD FROM PROTRUDING Q
Q
J - ABOVE THE BANKFULL ELEVATION. Ur (�
BANKFULL
0V I 3. ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN I INCH BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTING LOGS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH
of 10 J\\/\\/\tiON LIMBS AND OR BRUSH ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE GEOTEXTILE.
11
rco • - / 11� _" ^ o 0 J
o SILL LEN AIN
G SOIL BACKFILL \/� 0 . (�\, I 4. ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN I INCH BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTING BOULDERS SHALL BE CHINKED Z
t� / `I t�c� ) WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES. <
o ��,�, SELECT ��/ HEADER LOG Q > W
o P • BACKFILL MATERIAL /\)v. 4) / /\/ 15. ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE LOGS AND/OR BOULDERS NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE I— 0
v ��0 / \ I\//\// //\ PLACED AS SHOWN FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LOG AND BOULDER HOOK. H Z
� '� // /, ��/i� „//4 V//./�� �i (n
E SILL LOG/ROOT WAD .0. 0
LE •�', HIGH DENSITY NON WOVEN UNDISTURBED I G. BACKFILL STRUCTURE WITH SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL AS SHOWN. < 0
LIVE STAKING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC GROUND in0
FOOTER LOG 17. SELECT BACKFILL AND SOIL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF
L� STREAMBED THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM. W Z_ id
Z 2 ~
SECTION B—B' 18. NAIL NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO EDGE OF HEADER LOG AND BACKFILL AS SHOWN. Z W 0 I-
W inz
O 19. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN II
z PLANVIEW ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE a O cc
NOTE: DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN O. I FT OF THE GRADES AND 0_ a
a ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
THE DEPARTURE ANGLE SHOWN ABOVE IS DEPICTED IN SUCH A WAY TO
EMPHASIZE DETAIL. ACTUAL DEPARTURE ANGLE AND STRUCTURE LOCATION 20. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING PROJECT NUMBER: 0423
o SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ELAN AND PROFILE 5hEET5. PROJECT MANAGER: BPB
INSTALLATION OF IN STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
DESIGNED: MJG
a
2 I I . NO LIVE STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE LOG VANE AT OR BELOW THE TIE-IN DRAWN: TRS
`� LOG J—NOOK / WITH �OOTWAD ELEVATION OF THE HEADER LOG WITH THE STREAM BANK UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. CHECKED: AFM
NOT TO SCALE 22. FOOTER DEPTH ON ALL STRUCTURES REQUIRING FOOTERS SHALL BE G TIMES GREATER THAN THE DROP cc
SHEET NUMBER:
w BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE AND THE FOOTERED STRUCTURE DIRECTLY DOWNSTREAM.
Q D6
z
w
J
LL
1 \ 1

Appendix B —
Data/Analysis/Supplementary Information

RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument
Approval Letter

OTa�°p a DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
% WILMINGTON DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS
44 4'' ta 151 PATTON AVENUE
' — ROOM 208
ASHEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006
O wares of e '
December 4, 2019
Regulatory Division
SUBJECT: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the Environmental Banc & Exchange,
LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC) RES Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument- Gideon Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01462), Compass
Point Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01465), Green Mesa Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01466),
Twiman Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01467) and Scout Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01469)
Mr. Brad Breslow
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,North Carolina 27605
Dear Mr. Breslow:
This letter is to inform you that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps)has
reviewed and approved the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument(UMBI)
and Gideon (SAW-2017-01462), Compass Point(SAW-2017-01465), Green Mesa(SAW-2017-
01466), Twiman (SAW-2017-01467) and Scout(SAW-2017-01469) Final Mitigation Plans
dated August 2019, except for Green Mesa which is dated June 2019. In addition, the Corps has
issued a Nationwide Permit 27 (NWP 27)verification letter authorizing work in waters of the
United States associated with restoration of aquatic resources for each mitigation bank site,
except Green Mesa. As bank sponsor you are required to comply with the approved RES Yadkin
01 UMBI and each sites approved mitigation plan, the terms and conditions of your NWP 27
verification letter, and the Corps' regulations regarding compensatory mitigation (33 CFR 332).
The bank sponsor accepts all risk, liability, and responsibility for the success of all mitigation
activities associated with the approved mitigation bank site. In accordance with each Final
Mitigation Plan, the bank sponsor must prepare and submit annual monitoring reports to
document whether the stream restoration and enhancement areas on the project site meet the
necessary interim and final performance standards. When credits are debited from the mitigation
site,the bank sponsor must provide the Corps with an updated ledger form identifying the
purchaser of the credits,the project name,the permit number, and the number and type of credits
to be debited. When all stream credits have been consumed, no more credits may be sold from
this mitigation site.

From the Corps' perspective, the next phase in the establishment of the RES Yadkin 01
UMBI and the five initial mitigation sites,include recording the conservation easement to protect
the mitigation site, marking the boundary of the site with permanent signs, and executing the
necessary financial assurances. Once the conservation easement has been recorded and we
receive the required executed financial assurance documents,the Corps will be in a position to
approve an initial credit release for 15% of the total stream mitigation credits. We look forward
to working with you to ensure each Mitigation Site complies with the requirements of the
approved UMBI and site-specific mitigation plan
In all future correspondence concerning the UMBI or prospective new sites, please refer
to our file number, SAW-2016-02357, otherwise refer to the each site by its specific Action ID.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the
requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please contact Mr. Steve Kichefski by email at
[e-mail] or by phone at(828) 271-7980 extension 4234.
Sincerely,
Steve Kichefski
Project Manager,Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
RES Yadkin 01 NCIRT Distribution List

IRT Comment Response Memo

401 Op DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
q� \ 1r�.n WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
A , WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
` q.�� to
G
�."4' '' REPLY
ATTENTI T
STaxes OF ON OF
CESAW-RG/Browning May 1, 2019
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: RES Yadkin 01—Green Mesa Mitigation Site-Draft Mitigation Plan Review, Yadkin
County,NC
PURPOSE: The comments listed below were received from the NCIRT during the 30-day comment
period in accordance with Section 332.8(g) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule.
USACE AID#: SAW-2017-01466
30-Day Comment Deadline: November 21, 2018
Mac Haupt, NCDWR:
1. Table 5. Mapped Soil Series shows map unit HsA as Hatboro while Figure 7 shows HsA as
Hornsboro series. Please clarify which series is correct. Also, Table 5 shows Siloam soils as
having Hydrologic Soil Group D. Since this series is well drained the Soil Group is probably B.
2. Please remove the 30-day flow metric from Table 16.
3. Please make sure the locations of the wetlands are on the Final Design sheets.
4. DWR believes the more appropriate ratio for reach FF4-A is E2 at 2.5:1.
Special note: While DWR is approving this project to move forward, DWR would like to bring out
several characteristics of this project that will in the future result in this type of project being rejected.
These characteristics are listed below:
a. There is minimal functional uplift on the majority of the stream reaches.
b. A large pond in the middle of the project separates two sections of the project and essentially
greatly reduces the ecological benefit of the upstream reaches. Given the fact that all the
upstream reaches are enhancement reaches and low functional uplift enhancement, this
further diminishes the ecological effectiveness of these reaches.
c. Much of the project has less than the minimum requirement of riparian vegetated buffers.
d. There are numerous crossings (10) for the size of the project.
e. The project has an overall low percentage of stream restoration versus enhancement.
Kim Browning, USACE:
1. Reach FF4-A was limited by bedrock, with no pressure from crop production or livestock access.
A ratio of 2.5:1 is more appropriate here.

2. The number of crossings seems excessive for the total length of the project. On our field visit I
thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed(the one near the historic
building).
3. The Deep Creek W/S #14 dam/pond in the middle of the project prevents the upstream
enhancement activities from benefiting downstream reaches. Functional uplift should be
documented.
4. Table 9: Highly Functioning (HF) is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
5. On our field visit I thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed (the
one near the historic building).
6. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 16 in the Stream
Geomorphology and Hydraulic Performance standard to include "The Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach."The Cross Sections
performance standard in Section 7.1 should be updated to reflect this as well.
7. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add"260 trees"to the statement for year five.
8. Please provide a Service Area Map.
9. Please provide a monitoring map (or include on the Conceptual Plan Map)the location of the
gauge, existing wetland, veg plots,photo locations, etc.
10. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs,but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage, fence monitoring, encroachments, etc.
11. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond. Please
provide an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs,to include beaver removal (especially
since there was evidence of beaver activity near the pond along FF 1-B).
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
Steve Kichefski

MEMORANDUM 2res
302 Jefferson Street,Suite 110 Raleigh,North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
TO: NCIRT
FROM: Brad Breslow and Matt Butler -RES
DATE: June 6,2019
RE: Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank, Green Mesa Mitigation Bank Site,EPA,USACE and
NCDWR Draft Mitigation Plan Comments(SAW-2017-01466)
Mac Haupt,NCDWR:
1. Table 5.Mapped Soil Series shows map unit HsA as Hatboro while Figure 7 shows HsA as
Hornsboro series. Please clarify which series is correct.Also,Table 5 shows Siloam soils as
having Hydrologic Soil Group D. Since this series is well drained the Soil Group is probably B.
This was a typographic error on Figure 5,and Hatboro is the correct soil series;this has been revised
on Figure 5. Siloam soils within the Project(SmE and SmF),according to NRCS Web Soil Survey,
are both classified as D for the hydrological soil group.
2. Please remove the 30-day flow metric from Table 16.
This metric has been removed from Table 16.
3. Please make sure the locations of the wetlands are on the Final Design sheets.
Design sheets revised to show existing wetlands.
4. DWR believes the more appropriate ratio for reach FF4-A is E2 at 2.5:1.
Per recommendation from the IRT site visit on 10/17/2017,the initial approach of restoration for
Reach FF4-A was changed to Enhancement Level I(EI). Proposed improvements include
adding several in-stream structures,including brush toes that will be installed at 1+50 and 1+60
sta, and a log sill that will be installed at 2+47,benching the right bank for 474 LF, and planting
the buffer. RES feels that this EI approach is justified given the channel is currently oversized
and lacks a buffer along the south side.
Special note: While DWR is approving this project to move forward,DWR would like to bring
out several characteristics of this project that will in the future result in this type of project being
rejected. These characteristics are listed below:
a. There is minimal functional uplift on the majority of the stream reaches.
b.A large pond in the middle of the project separates two sections of the project and
essentially greatly reduces the ecological benefit of the upstream reaches. Given the fact
that all the upstream reaches are enhancement reaches and low functional uplift
enhancement,this further diminishes the ecological effectiveness of these reaches.
c.Much of the project has less than the minimum requirement of riparian vegetated
buffers.
d. There are numerous crossings(10)for the size of the project.
e. The project has an overall low percentage of stream restoration versus enhancement.

RES recognizes that the Green Mesa Mitigation Site falls short on the types of parameters the IRT
are looking for when accepting a site.Moving forward,RES ensures that these parameters and any
project constraints will be addressed at the initiation of the project. RES appreciates the attention
and understanding of the IRT during the development and subsequent approval of the Green Mesa
Mitigation Plan.
Kim Browning,USACE:
1. Reach FF4-A was limited by bedrock,with no pressure from crop production or livestock access.
A ratio of 2.5:1 is more appropriate here.
Per recommendation from the IRT site visit on 10/17/2017 (below),the initial approach of
restoration for Reach FF4-A was changed to Enhancement Level I (EI). Proposed improvements
include adding several in-stream structures,including brush toes that will be installed at 1+50 and
1+60 sta, and a log sill will be installed at 2+47,benching the right bank for 474 LF, and planting
the buffer. RES feels that this EI approach is justified given the channel is currently oversized and
lacks a buffer along the south side.
Green Mesa Site-10/17/17
Overall the site has clear potential for functional uplift,but there arc a few notable constraints
including powcrline easement and a large pond that will remain(landowner will not allow pond
to be part of project).Because the pond will remain in place,RL•S and USACE discussed
potentially retrofitting the riser structure to include a bottom pond drain to release cooler water.
IRT members agreed the Green Mesa site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation,and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan.Reach specific comments are
below.
+ FF4 and FF1-D:RES originally proposed restoration at a 1:1 ratio.The approach is a mix
of Priority I and II restoration with potential for enhancement level I above the powerlline
based on bedrock in the channel.USACE said clearly justify rationale for restoration
measures.
2. The number of crossings seems excessive for the total length of the project. On our field visit I
thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed(the one near the
historic building).
RES notes the constraints in the project and we have used the non-standard buffer tool to assess
and adjust our crediting allotments per the site constraints. We examined removing this crossing
but were unable to given landowner constraints.
3. The Deep Creek W/S#14 dam/pond in the middle of the project prevents the upstream
enhancement activities from benefiting downstream reaches.Functional uplift should be
documented.
RES understands, and the constrains of Deep Creek W/S#14 dam/pond are now documented in
Section 4,in response to this comment.
4. Table 9: Highly Functioning(HT)is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
"Highly Functioning"ratings have been revised to"Functioning"rating, as Highly Functioning
will not be demonstrated.
5. On our field visit I thought it was stated that the existing crossing on FF3 would be removed(the
one near the historic building).
RES notes the constraints in the project and we have used the non-standard buffer tool to assess
and adjust our crediting allotments per the site constraints. We examined removing this crossing
but were unable to given landowner constraints.

6. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 16 in the Stream
Geomorphology and Hydraulic Performance standard to include"The Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach."The Cross
Sections performance standard in Section 7.1 should be updated to reflect this as well.
The entrenchment ratio performance standard has been updated in response to this comment.
7. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add"260 trees"to the statement for year five.
The success criteria have been updated in response to this comment.
8. Please provide a Service Area Map.
Figure 1 has been updated to serve as the Service Area and Project Vicinity Map.
9. Please provide a monitoring map(or include on the Conceptual Plan Map)the location of the
gauge,existing wetland,veg plots,photo locations,etc.
Figure 12 has been added to present the Monitoring Plan.
10. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs,but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage,fence monitoring,encroachments,etc.
As noted in Section 10,UP2S has provided engagement letters that state their responsibilities to
include the maintenance of easement boundary signage, annual on-site monitoring/inspections
(which will include fence monitoring,where applicable), and encroachments.Any potential
violations,including encroachment,will be promptly communicated to the landowner.
11. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond.Please
provide an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs,to include beaver removal(especially
since there was evidence of beaver activity near the pond along FF1-B).
An itemized breakdown has been included in the mitigation plan,in Section 12.Maintenance
costs include beaver removal and other considerations.

Vegetation Survey

Protocol for Existing Conditions Vegetation Surveying
Plot Selection and Setup
Survey multiple plots on-site,which together are representative of all ecotypes present within the
easement boundaries. Each plot is a 5m X 20m belt transect,positioned parallel to the channel in the
floodplain or adjacent upland.
Take a GPS point at the origin and set the bounds with 5m as the "x-axis"and 20m as the "y-axis." Set
the plot with the y-axis as the side parallel to the stream channel. Record the y-axis azimuth to allow for
future resampling. Conclude selection and set-up with a representative photo of the plot taken from the
origin.
Data Collection
Identify each plant in the plot to the species level. Sort and measure tree species by height class and
diameter at breast height(DBH). Count seedlings<54in(137cm)in height into height categories 0-9cm,
10-50cm, 51-100cm,or 101-137cm. Count saplings>54in(137cm)in height into DBH categories 0-1cm,
1-2.5cm,2.5-5cm,or 5-12.7cm.Measure the DBH of all trees>5in(12.7cm)DBH. Shrubs,vines,and
herbaceous taxa receive an estimation of their percent cover over the substrate within the plot. If the
personnel are unable to identify to the species level,collect voucher photos and/or specimen(s)for later
identification. Record these on the data sheet as UNK-1,UNK-2,etc.
Data Processing
Begin processing collected data by identifying the unknown species observed from voucher photos and
specimen(s)collected. When species present are sufficiently identified,use the dominant canopy species
assemblages and ecological region to identify a habitat type from Schafale (2012).
Calculate both basal area and stems per acre for each plot surveyed using the formulas below.These
metrics help to inform the existing conditions of the canopy on-site and inform the development of the
project's planting plan.
Basal Area Formula:
Basal area of each tree(m2)=0.00007854 X(DBHcm)2
Basal area of plot(m2/ha)=(sum of basal areas for all trees in plot)X 100
•100 is to scale up from our 0.01ha plot to lha
Stems per Acre Formula:
Stems/Acre=(#of stems)/0.02471

,
.... �[
re f •� .
'Sp ik
Nr
4 ��y r.
y + y� �, y 2Q.,‘,
lk
-�.Le+^
x
s. 4 a ler
\a "`\ttr fit. 7 \p
T uP 2a
+t4+" y.�,. 1Via, �`*, 4'.
*.
t
+ .,k
} A-V' tiyF\ 4 y4 „ aiLlitilir
a o�9 ',
tea'
'.4"'*' ' r ,
` v,
,‘,,
.. , ,iir
r
,...„
-,. ,
Legend
Proposed Easement
♦ Vegatation Survey Plots
y
N
Vegatation Survey Date: 8/2/2018
_ fAiP4I6A-V agI I Il P�•iOSi� w E Drawn by: M D E
+,t—irA :milli A`tj�� 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
y �e"� 0 250 500� Checked by: xxx
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet
Feet

i
w **
' ,._
..
�1 4.11, > o o
P V - vi r
f. e o
e .... ` ..
rt.., t +) V 12 m - \
O I I Y
7 11 eil �
t C,
+ i A ,
r +
II
di cu
(/ L
4
4 COCil C
O1
II• .r
m U
N 0 o
A
LA L u -
GN Ln
j.Z ill s
• •• •
u
Lit N
✓I• ei
I i w L
= u C +M
CI all in e-I f0
0 nj LA s_
' • O a w
�C a
, lit— - _ on
v • Z C
7+ 0
oA E Q 7' cu
L
J 0 Q N p O O Q
r — r I 1 4 a C
E c .a
_- r. N C
.-1 ,Ain
N
s-D as
U E
Gi t o O� C
(4
i -4. F-
(U p •on � " rn
0 CI. = ^ Y
Z
L Z N m +
a �
0
0.; . • as
CALLI r r C
0 N E C `- U
co kr. c, m p O © O N
in
111 Io
E = _ _ _ �-
a;r
•
C
I
-
A I CD
cn
13
V a� cal—
v ..--7,
r V
�"�- CC 5 ''( � ^ �' CJ o ( d
tr—
•

. , . .
.YAv�a
,. ..
CA '`
v.
1 r
Li.st- t
-4,
4. d Jj
�' v
tNi ils e
:1 c..........:. t?
A ......_ ,_.>
q v N
i
`j
.Ci VI
v
IL
( o
FA, 0
sit Cr
o
A _
s _
U _ }
t:
rti qJ ? - `----
„- � \ t 1
(� L
` - /
4
-0 go A. LR - 1

411
L . w
il `° N.At
M V E▪ om •\ n\ 4` t` 0\ �\ ��+ 4, e s�
O 1 0 9 e - Q I �, J`• \.
tliPA NN v � v -�. vv
• ++ a E
N ` c
W =
6.1 . . I ,
i 0
*, _ . ., .
t .
h Vl
�1n 112
t-
in
U
3 A 0
h` ` � ,
c t t I— ,Q. in
t " Ni
1 I A I A
W ii t an
ei v
Z VI • • / • 4
U --
'-f1 N
VI v •
�i • 4 4 p
q1 III AAl
ns
N .� O I rl- w
v z c
v ..1-, 3 a U v'
co. O E N O O i Q
♦ • `
n d c
" ` m 0?
.i CO
N � a Q VI
-
1V ° o ` a
_ An
Y
o a
4.► AZ
A (N7 u •0 0) 0
In 11.I C O mkA E `4 t AS•
M
W _
C
C E
U V1 f,
Ln
•
w ` L 1 (.1
IL
J 4_
73
O � asA c1e 2,:. 3 T-
0 • .* o • 0 If

r, q, a , 4,
/
✓ '\ N
a
3
1
1 7.5
i ck
i ....0,..
i vl
a
i
a .4
o 4b
A
dJLZ
g.
...... tt._ t
\I A
fr c:). ‘.9 il ,,,t3,
"', 42, i
c J
Y
1 p o�n ri
v
F
M p
P1 \ �� V a
AA
x a 6 -qk 'A- i -r- g . = o
4)
Zv.... 2 2 4 9
U
Z
7 n
2 '.
7 7
1
4
f

4 I I
via `1 ♦� -.. C� L 1 s -. •{� ••46 \ O s'l 1 tN lb ,
ri.�► U g
4 *L4V.u.I; -.LTc84.",,
4ti,%l _ (" N! • ,
4 418, w
4 „
_ _
CD
1 1 _ _
N
a7
U
II
= u r
y9 onT 0 0
ji n
w
i
O j 6 )r ( 'cNi N
Z in -.
1
u c
N N
a L^
N a9-` m („
0 (NIu) ' i
z i� c ,i °°
d § 1
- En O • R "O a tam Q
—I J Q ;- V 4 , t...\ 4 ,._T 43
m in
CO
ell vs 0 m r� y�
tri
vi — . c . - ?\ 4 , 4 ....,......4
CIJ
WO + - '4 z
A U ^ 4J1
UL V L CO
CSin
..
G! —I
i N vl
O
2 LLcu
0 4,) _;-, A , .,, \.1\ of 11 w 4 i 6,.._ , r a)
70,a C V-'
141 a cN 'CC i Z vv ° n ' 9 ) 45 a 7 i ;�

/-
\(
g
Q
•
\
L
" 4

Darn Information

7/2/2018 Interactive Reports
Login
•; Corps ap '_ ational Inventory of Dams
Home NID By State NID National NIu Interactive Keport interactive map Help
NID Detail Report
Report View Row 1 of 1 Exclude Null Values Displayed Columns
Dam Name DEEP CREEK W/S#14(PL-566)
River NORTH DEEP CREEK-TR
State NC
County YADKIN
Owner Name YADKIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Private Dam N
NID Storage 211
Max Discharge 960
Max Storage 211
Drainage Area 1.009
Longitude -80.7205
Latitude 36.213
Dam Designer USDA NRCS
Core IEK
Other Dam Name
Foundation SZ
EAP Y
Inspection Date 07/22/2013
Spillway Type U
Spillway Width 0
NIDID NC00396
Owner Type Local Government
Dam Type Earth
Primary Purpose Flood Control
All Purposes Flood Control
Inspection Frequency 5
Year Completed 1963
Surface Area 5.8
State Reg Dam Y
State Reg.Agency DEQ
StatelD
Section
Year Modified
Outlet Gates U
Volume 0
Number Of Locks 0
Length Of Locks 0
Width Of Locks 0
Fed Funding USDA NRCS
Fed Design USDA NRCS
Fed Construction USDA NRCS
Fed Regulatory
Fed Inspection
Fed Operation
Fed Owner
Fed Other
Source Agency NC
Submit Date 10/29/2015
Congressional District NC05
Political Party R
Normal Storage 18
Congressional Rep. Virginia Foxx(R)
Other Structure Id -
Url Address -
Number Of Separate Structures 0
Permitting Authority Y
Inspection Authority Y
Enforcement Authority Y
http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:4:0::NO 1/2

7/2/2018 Interactive Reports
NID Detail Report
Jurisdictional Dam Y
Dam Former Name -
Eap Last Rev Date 06/16/2015
Zoom To
NID Height(Ft.) 26.2
Dam Length(Ft.) 410
Dam Height(Ft.) 26.2
Structural Height(Ft.) 0
Hydraulic Height(Ft.) 9
City HIGH ROCK
Distance -
nobody en-us
http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:4:0::NO 2/2

Non-Standard Buffer Width Calculations

Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Site Name: Green Mesa
USACE Action ID:
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor: RES
County: Yadkin
Minimum Required Buffer Width': 50
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
Mitigation Type Baseline Stream Credit
Multiplier' Length'
Restoration(1:1) 1 3657 3657.00
Enhancement I(1.5:1) 1.5 474 316.00
Enhancement 11(2.5:1) 2.5 993 397.20
Preservation(5:1) 5
Other(7.5:1) 7.5 3439 458.53
Other(10:1) 10 602 60.20
Custom Ratio 1 3 560 186.67
Custom Ratio 2 5 219 43.80
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals 9944.00 5119.40
Buffer Width Zone(feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
Buffer Zones less than 15 feet >15 to 20 feet >20 to 25 feet >25 to 30 feet >30 to 35 feet >35 to 40 feet >40 to 45 feet >45 to 50 feet >50 to 75 feet >75 to 100 feet >100 to 125 feet >125 to 150 feet
Max Possible Buffer(square feet)° 298320 99440 99440 99440 99440 99440 99440 99440 497200 497200 497200 497200
Ideal Buffer(square feet)s 301588.3167 100292.8912 100577.3474 101014.9242 101197.3495 100718.6516 100472.9653 99957.01927 486812.912 480600.017 478525.033 477994.3163
Actual Buffer(square feet)° 286773.5689 92218.76835 90543.82319 89222.98988 87620.0047 86095.11824 84921.71665 83480.82521 290070.7228 123839.6154 52219.51204 25328.64751
Zone Multiplier 50% 10% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 5% 4% 4%
Buffer Credit Equivalent 2559.70 511.94 511.94 511.94 255.97 255.97 255.97 255.97 358.36 255.97 204.78 204.78
Percent of Ideal Buffer 95% 92% 90% 88% 87% 85% 85% 84% 60% 26% 11% 5%
Credit Adjustment -125.74 -41.21 -51.07 -59.76 -34.34 -37.16 -39.62 -42.19 213.53 65.96 22.35 10.85
Total Baseline Credit Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
5119.40 -431.10 312.68 -118.42 5000.98
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank(50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
'Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios,which are equal to the number of feet in the feet-to-credit mitigation ratio(e.g.,for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit,the multiplier would be 8).
'Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type.If stream reaches are not creditable,they should be excluded from this measurement,even if they fall within the easement.
4This amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width.This number is not used in calculations,but is provided as a reference.
5Maximum potential size(in square feet)of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches,calculated using GIS,including areas outside of the easement.The inner zone(0-15')should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known.Non-creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
°Square feet in each buffer zone,as measured by GIS,excluding non-forested areas,all other credit type(e.g.,wetland,nutrient offset,buffer),easement exceptions,open water,areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard,etc.Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width,so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement.Non-creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.

Morphological Parameters

Green Mesa Morphological Parameters
Reference Reach Existing Exisiting Design
UT to Mill Creek UT to Grassy Creek FF1-A FF1-B FF1-C FF1-D FF2 FF3 FF4-A FF4-B FF5 FF4-B FF1-B FF1-D(DS End) FF3 FF5
Feature Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Riffle riffle(Norll iffle(Soutf Riffle I Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle Riffle I Riffle Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool Riffle I Pool
Drainage Area(ac) 921 426 498 585 686 1011 63 75 222 242 34 242 585 1011 75 35
Drainage Area(mi2) 1.44 0.67 0.78 0.91 1.07 1.58 0.10 0.12 0.35 0.38 0.05 0.38 0.91 1.58 0.12 0.05
NC Regional Curve Discharge(cfs)2 116.1 66.2 74.1 83.4 93.6 124.3 16.4 18.7 41.2 43.8 10.5 43.8 83.4 124.3 19 11
NC Regional Curve Discharge(cfs)3 118.6 68.6 76.7 86.0 96.2 126.7 17.7 20.0 43.3 45.9 11.5 45.9 86.0 126.8 20 12
Design/Calculated Discharge(cfs) 113-122 50 61 47 109 161 36 17 61 71 14 60 70 125 17 15
Dimension
BF Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 27.7 34.7 18.1 23.4 9.6 17.0 23.0 3.5 22.1 27.5 33.5 37.2 42.2 7.0 6.1 8.4 15.5 12.6 15.3 13.2 3.1 15.0 21.1 20.3 34.5 30.0 4.2 7.2 12.6 3.0 5.8
BF Width(ft) 17.5 18.6 13.7 15.0 18.5 15.0 33.4 24.6 14.6 24.9 26.1 21.1 17.7 6.9 9.8 24.3 8.2 7.8 11.8 7.9 7.9 15.5 18.6 18.0 19.0 23.2 5.6 11.0 11.5 6.7 7.4
BF Mean Depth(ft) 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.6 0.5 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.7 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.8 1.3 1.2 0.7 1.1 0.5 1.2
BF Max Depth(ft) 2.5 3.4 1.7 2.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 0.5 2.0 1.7 2.6 3.9 4.4 1.4 0.7 1.1 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 0.7 1.6 2.9 1.5 3.0 2.1 2.1 0.9 1.8 0.7 2.1
Wetted Perimeter(ft) 19.3 21.1 14.9 16.8 18.9 15.8 34.9 24.8 16.3 25.6 28.1 24.0 21.7 8.1 10.5 24.9 10.7 9.8 13.4 9.9 8.2 16.0 20.3 18.5 20.2 24.1 11.0 11.3 12.2 7.0 11.0
Hydraulic Radius(ft) 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.4 0.5 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.3 0.4 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.5 1.0
Width/Depth Ratio 11.1 10.6 9.8 9.6 35.7 13.2 48.6 175.6 9.7 22.6 20.3 12.0 7.4 6.7 15.8 70.2 4.3 4.8 9.1 4.7 20.1 15.0 17.1 16.0 10.5 17.0 7.5 16.8 10.5 14.0 7.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 72.5 - >50 NA 34.1 18 >50 >50 25.2 >30 >30 >30 >30 20.3 19.0 >30 --- --- >30 30.0 10.9 >30 - >50 - >30 - >50 - >30 -
Entrenchment Ratio 4.3 - >2.2 NA 1.8 1.2 1.8 3.3 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.7 3.0 1.9 1.2 --- --- 2.5 3.8 1.4 >4 - >4 - >4 - >4 - 2.8 -
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.6 2.7 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.0 3.2 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.4 2.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bed Material
Description(D50) Gravel/Cobble Gravel Gravel Silt/Clay Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Sand Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel
D16(mm) 12 2.8 4 0.062 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.1 3.1 3.1 1 - - - - -
D50(mm) 54 11 27 0.062 3 5.6 27 23.8 9.2 9.2 1.6 - - - - -
D84(mm) 120 16 68 2 70 11 72 39.6 28 28 6.9 - - - - -
Pattern
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 35.0 85.0 26.3 55.5 29 61 56 85 46 113 37 65 34
Radius of Curvature(ft) 13.0 54.0 13.5 103.3 15 113 31 55 17 72 19 35 13 34
Radius of Curvature Ratio 0.9 3.7 1.0 7.6 1 8 2 3 1 5 2 3 2 5
Meander Wavelength(ft) 67.0 105.0 49.4 66.0 54 73 150 200 89 139 85 130 40 54
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 5.9 3.6 4.8 4 5 3 5 3 8 3 6 6 8
Profile
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Riffle Length(ft) 6 17 6.0 18.0 3 16 - - 7 20 25 61 7 80 11 52 7 15
Run Length(ft) 6 17 5.0 13.0 3 10 - - 6 15 18 23 22 36 8 14 - -
Pool Length(ft) 4 16 5.0 42.0 8 20 - - 6 47 12 45 26 71 5 25 4 9
Pool-to-Pool Spacing(ft) 26 68 18.0 64.0 17 30 - - 20 73 80 125 80 193 28 100 13 15
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length(ft) 202 279 1041 658 769 1395 610 1544 447 423 1351 415 1100 146 408 105
Channel Length(ft) 230 318 1211 852 797 1507 617 1967 475 454 1621 444 1267 185 500 113
Sinuosity 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.29 1.04 1.08 1.01 1.27 1.06 1.07 1.20 1.07 1.15 1.27 1.23 1.08
Channel Slope(ft/ft) 0.012 0.005 0.020 0.004 0.015 0.005 0.047 0.019 0.011 0.008 0.025 0.0097 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.050
Rosgen Classification E3 E4 B4 B6c B4c B4c A4 B4c E4 E4 B5 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 B4
Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data
2 NC Regional Curve equations source:Doll et al.(2003)
3 NC Regional Curve equations source:Sweet and Geratz(2003)

Reach FF4-A(US) FF4-B(DS) FF1-D(@ Road)FF1-D(DS end) FF5-A FF1-C FF1-A FF1-B FF2 FF3
DA(ac) 210 242 928 1010 35 686 498 585 63 72
DA(sqmi) 0.33 0.38 1.45 1.58 0.05 1.07 0.78 0.91 0.10 0.11
Slope 1.00% 1.00% 0.60% 0.60% 3.60% 1.28% 1.58% 0.60% 2.40% 2.40%
Width 11.70 8.16 12.50 13.70 7.79 14.60 0.15 13.40 6.87 7.45
Mean Depth 1.31 1.60 2.19 2.49 0.39 1.51 0.90 1.04 1.02 0.53
QBKF 61 71Ill 161 13 109 61 47 36 17
"BkfA 15.3 15.6 34.1 3.13 22.1 12.3 14 7 3.94
FFQ Analysis
Q1.1 45 49 103 108 17 87 73 80 23 25
Q1_5 71 77 166 174 25 139 116 127 35 38
Q2 92 100 211 221 34 178 149 163 47 51
Clio 200 218 494 520 67 410 338 373 96 104
Rural Piedmont Regional Curves
NC-QBKF orig 39 44 117 124 11 94 74 83 16 18
NC-QBKF rev 42 46 119 127 12 96 77 86 18 19
"BKFcSA 10.4 28.2 29.9 3.1 23.0 18.6 20.7 4.7 5.1
VA-QBKF 15 17 62 68 3 47 35 40 5 6
USGS RR Eqns(Region 1)
Q2(1996 EQNS) 74 186 197 19 151 121 135 29 32
Q2(2001 EQNS) 68 175 186 18 142 113 127 27 29
Q2 84 201 212 24 165 134 149 35 38
Q5 160 372 393 48 308 252 279 69 75
Clio 218 501 527 66 415 341 377 95 103
Q25 298 673 708 92 559 461 509 132 143
Q50 369 826 869 116 688 569 626 164 178
Recommended Design Flows=
Qbnkfull 60 1 125 15

Cross Sections of Current Conditions

' � .
! 4 , YL, i P-!
F 4 i i 7 F 4{ In
4 (1
a
,� rr O
In
!� MAv L / yy4 L W4
0
uppr� 3
b6 1 Ci
_ y a O N
in
1 d
Ai
.12 P.
r CO —
co
X
B m
N
, (.....................) ( o 2
N a
LI °-
s Q
0 I
d
C N
—o
7
O
in
o
s r ca O
l L
0.
I 1 m
in
#8010,..4*,'Y
i a O
—. I� O U7 V CON O O OD I- (O
O O O O O O O O OD OD OD OD
,, �s' (11) uoi;enal3
' m "'tits, . .`'

f .y q-t A 'iK^`
f '
•
L`M r '^ ed�
"'-
n i9 v
v !t aA I�ri
O
d Et k j"Y -S.,t L co
tA
Yrt
ci
�3 , • C
r a 0
(6
v 4 Lf) d
_ "�^' N CU
!
�l Q
O
vm°.. ki io a a: N
N cg —
N
Ti
X
a m
aU.
y X
0 0
Q
in
.�, U.
Q
M"i1kr,' F, �� S^ S I
V
mac/
Y�
C
O C)
�4v� A
E
f3
' 4 ,
tA
0.
O
�`- lf') (0 lf-) LU lf-) V lf-) ellf-) N lf-)
co U) 0 V 0 (M 0) (V 0)
a�, 0) 0) O) O) O) 0)
r.
(H.) uol;eAeI

L
n �
o
i in
LO
I
03
Q
In N
o
Q
o
CU
Q U7
Z co
N
y c
X co
0 N i
m 0 a
Q
' � �e L I
.wr .,,,�a., - ,.'',..' ink! :, I -. t CI
'"' 10."'"'4':} '' : .iee-1,
A{gyp
i 5 �� f 3"A .2 p O 3
Y ! y �`' xq N p
k a a 0
a N%f [ b
�r'"w 'ate i,.� �y a i
-r i- y y }E y kq �:tl�
io
S
lif
�r t.
o
H
in
sp a ' :
o
in N- LU (0 LU LU in LU
� : t a) rn a) rn rn rn rn m
,
° f (�1) uol;enal3

�, ��.1, 3 .ay -f. °,^ _In
F C ,� t'" 1
co
9' 4 'J -'R {4rc t ,!f O
ids j'� S9"
- ,
fe* �` & _ ' N-
d
al
'. a L N-
- _i. N 0
as
o in
o
O
t. O o
o
LL
%sMCr' �+`YLo
m,', Y�
, �� c �. ��."�- ail` , ram+
" c i lfu t c
O
fA v y
M c m
X o r 00
v N o
m
a
in
Q
ak 1 LPL M I
.�¢ 4. r s
' f o
° " ��' d M
et
-�xb o
wY gin t£- any ` { in
N 0
� �. ,FNa "�i' O
. � i "a ,_g N
•
""w'� ��5P E
- , -,,,,4114,t4 4.,:e.,,
17,
t91 0.
o
in
8�8Ale' �n �n co �n �n Ln Ln in in
r rY. 4� i rW Fi r' .l N O In U7 N 0) N V
�' sa -f O) O lf') 0) In V O)
` ' v ni - i rn rn rn rn
n (u) uoReAel3
h

V !" -
4 N . 5 ap „
iiZ!; ° zY 1
LO
x
w
v
a C v
V., �� -V
� r"
Q
LO
a. �..- M 00
xr.
,..-', ,--,-2. ,,,..:',.!:: ,. 4.' '''W:'Y' ''.'' ,Li';',,:' , _
O
~d .,';-.,._'i..,..'.1,-,,',..._:,__-
ye..A..'r '.?.. *na .,:,5 , 4 LL
,,, ,
Y
,�, C
N COm
.
V Cn
X
0 O
u_ a
U. Q
ra . ��
r cr ♦ t
CU
Ct
S L O
4 - 4 G 0
o
.%„.____:±i, ... _:_*„.144it. :.
h54 •\ 'TA'
liii
Cal t..
`a \ Lo
Ktritiltit'IV.to-- -:�.
Flea ,� rM
0 co CO
rr .:'
�" � . 0.1) uoReAel3
'' ate pan
ti

•
�. 9
r9
M
L
N
C
0
CIr.
co N
d
N
Y 0_l
_ O
.
LO
to
co
X
o o
as
V N CO m
' N
0 0
u_ a
LL a
Ce
o
E
L
Ff Qin
I 1\
s`�.: ids
! aMo allo ao 0 0
s (11) uol;enel3
Sty
Via.
r,...s ,1

4
q, t
ggi }�
',6 '1 ds c x`" b '- �� S
1 ' .i^y M
fC
d
.,
N
C
3
0
0 0
M N
N
Q
N
ems •
,' Q
d' O
�tE. R :, _ •aim ,�:. L O
�:.°c. i -* if E
F
Cl)
d Y
X 0 r m
V N X
0 0
u_ ) Lo
a
LI CD
ca
�' F ryCt
�.= x° .y r.. 5 ��:
't� I
r c .
Lo
;:-,..;-;./ '4 .'.-7L,-,..‘.,;„.H54.-.. ,. . , . ......_;
)1 _ 0
vR�va�w - I i.
CO CO
, � ,.
co
�,� '� (11) uoReAel3
!f. / ,: r

M
'
ca
cv
o°
3 a,
in
c
F N
c
O
•
Q
O
•
o
all, .,.
c as
Um
_
r. a
=
r m
N x
0 O
I
'
LO
Um
I.rtY,..,,.,'.'':',.'....,.",-..'-S.A 4w ikilE,f1-iT''_,.,t.;,,kd,,.y`',,''i i'1*'7:4,-.',..f..,.4 l:,,',',...,,'_4,..w y
eCctDU
y. f :1... 3
ft., ak i*�. O (�
ti'tom - yLo
,, L
t-" YPt �i''..�.E O"�"�y7 a'
tr'ut -S_ —0
HH�s �ll �rrrTTT"lya _ qt
co 0 N- N- N- N- N- N- N- N-/
0
cv 01 N- N-
t �� (j ) uol;eAel3

c+ Alt,5
' ar� �'v ,I � 'fit,'u
i *:
� L
N
o°
N
i Q
N
N
C
O
O_
-O
s • r O
rt a �°�t O
.• d oN
Cl)co
3
X V
o
Q o m
N x
0 O
LL a
sF a sLo
Ic)
et
n *4,,.
O
0,',',.--, ti. ...';''',-.'1;;;"'i.-'-',.. 4.7i1'..'' '
0
w k
�. E
LO
2.
+. k3- ' L
:'-- 1- 'r- - -
it
'
_ ONO W cv O0 0
.w.

yy
�k,'r` i 1 Y
C Fed 1 1 M ,n .,�•3 f ,
O
( el
1
l f � r .<
h It, 4
e
1 19 m
1 g . A '
+�+ N
as
40
y, 0. y
r lhR v- Ply � �, O
4'. a ° O
U
( � a try i o
LL
" F t! y y
03
a) d
ct
Cl) c
r m
N N
LI 0 0
LL §-
• V Q
. , Io fix, = r . co
Nay ,4 d
)f � fr ct
t !' Oi
' (� li ;, 2
if
�m .> o�� . c3
a s ' ' I
Yn.,.... .. . .r.,.....:..,...„ ...,....t,.„:,,14,.1,'.. ,,,,g1;„3.1't )': 1,-I
a
, ,1.0,d..,?....'..,,,-;,:,,';.',.:-;6?0,.k. .)‘(''''.'',4;77'' 't"Y '''l ? ''',
,-. .. --1,:..A.',.-..;i.-,.,-.: :;.. 'i cf„, „.„ ,,,,,,..,,,i1..,‘
_ 0
In In In V In M In N In In
.Y., + 'jay' x+ _A .3 ., -F
a ti:� (H.) uoi;enal3

•..f,tallt
i r E I 1 _ in
M
��(�tf �A r 4 i i+
oss
o
Ti
12
Ii
el I
N
LL p
u_ a
yC.) _
S Q
in
h gyp,:
t t �bi�i° a • re
,,,„.,,,. .
I
' _ -
O
,.k
E
1,;I. sZ in
�L1 VAS;
‘it
i;
is
r,tr ‘..'
' ,� lf') N- lf') M lf') in in V lf') M lf') N
w ( ) uoi;eAe J

• ,at ,,-fie;;:
. 0
E M
fC
��,> I
0o
Q
o
1� N LL
o
r
co V
X N y CO
co CI)
LL 0 0
u- a
d
•
, a
ti ' 0
,-: ''�
r ; am„ , i
-4 y
co a '7 t -
1.. Y I
g � r� � '� T �
314-
;44.
b 5. .E� _ }: tmo!f - y,i
,-.- ..-if!,,'7,-;•'..'::' '..!!!,....-It ti. • , -.,,,,-..-", .. ..-ot4 \ 1 o
i}f q ,e N ' $
wY
a Y7 v (11) uol;enal3
-'...: .off

. h T
}r r
Vr
y {r
b ro 4 k 1i
ih 3 'r! I
k'T'- *. t.� fig._ �. riR .1 •
T fl .
tiVti;...-;',....7 ,x 1.# .' a) In
- '' 'p. N
o
47 i 4 1,' P. i\NI\I o
fir,
INKo
1.440iii.00,:!'''
b"I s r, k t O
co d
X Y
c
c
cz
r m
m N
4 0 2
U. a
'� h e d
- .,._r*,,,-..1...4:,.."„rw,',4,...,..... ,,,.,,-, ::,..., ,, »h
v 30
BARi Y x �,
..',,';':L .,
';':. , ,. L In
r IMf
� Y .a."
VI
O
.,t'J '.: F ij .l M N O O W ID O
1',e3;IL..:'!:":::
_ 5 1k � , Y v, .{_ F) O O O O 00 00 00 00
fY5

'1,1111fr":.4'
R o
t /,fir .. € w;..r ,
pt., r '.,a' a. O
y hh. Q
LL
•
Fr � m
_ . t i Q
��¢ s
r .S . SP C
N
""' ' ' ri E5 0
,
N d
Ce
XLO
0:,111111111.1V4.16, iin:‘,...,-,tie-7.A1440,...;--,4-444,l'''_''''' ...'..,..,,,'' ' '':'::::
r CO
el
m N X
4' 0 0
xPL G kcci
r` a LL Q
s I
ce
u
s u.
/O^
I
E
cci
Lo
O.
3 N
0
00
•'11ems ;. 0000CO
{ � � i
1 Kt
I ti a . ( ) uo;enal3
r ;E r T ' y C4 k.

\ \\ . « ? \ _ g
, /
\ \
. »d\ ••\\ • /2\\ « \ ----....
� E
§
.
g
-
��\��22 °
- . «\
\d \ / .........
)
\\ •
\\ :ow
-
\ /¥ \
_
= y I
__«
\$ 12
j
-vz= 6
.
\ � . I
/
^ E r
I.
` §
.
% a<' \\ m
\ . \ . . o
2 ^ \ •/ . % S / G ) § 80
H.
. - .
« \ � ° < ( ) u R23
. »[ \\- .
} \ ° 2^° \

N
N
E
N
N
In
0 ON
td
tti
N
r
opc
6
..
O
, (.0
LL
V
0.1 r
N
to
Y
X o C
CI m
Q N X
u
o 0
u Q
(Q
ttal
Ce
-a
C
op 2
"4 ::: Ir-. V
1
E
vs
tn
al
t
x
�� r N
y ..,R,. 7a ejL:W.�t
'--
- O
CO N"- M f') V M 00 O CO ODl
00 CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 I�
«� (;;) uol;enal3

d`x a '4 4 fWD'
4 . aZ ,
w- fl� ,-
M
y
C
0
0
N IL.
µ ,'Te N
I.a o CU
CD
.. 0
r a)
Cl) o
c
r co
y
LO
0 0
LL
in a
1 1i V .:It
it I
11
,. o
O 0
A J ir
A I
y 7 )
d .) . ft sd R
in
MI . . . ,, .,,
0
al
f i 1 ' ,. '. O 0) O O O
7 �
"- r ; � ) uoi;enal3
�, 1 , O 1

Channel Stability Assessment

[ e , , Ge , , _ CC , GO GO G / a )
7 , , Ge G _ Ge , w w m , , / r )
[ , , , _ 0- , _ 00 Ge GO GO G / r )
m
[ , , - Cl r Cl r , Cl = e , § 7, )
\
so
; CV
9 4 , ƒ
§ S a , _ , z ce ) z
V =
to
oo CD g /
- , a , Ge , , , , , , GO ° z 00 !41 } =
_ ±
! e
/ , , , , , _ , _ / G / =
0,1 \
/ , , _ , , _ , w w / r ] \ /
I
I
- /\ ` - k \ -
! ] - ° 0 f ® )
§ ' k ' , k k ] i 7
§ ) - . ] % —
§ ! ) k k ] / { § @ ) §
/ ; R ) a k \ ; ) ; ; k / zv
_ el n - < 0 N GC 0 - . - -
jj so

a
CD
3 0) LI)
0 E 3 0 U tg�L 2 0 S: v CI
r cl ° � � Y (cpa) y . w C
N ` O >. o O > S: c) E y CO .N 3 - O t U > p o T m S rn a E O TD ° a) - U
a) O > a N N O U E O C - 0 V a) 3 N > ` U -6 0)
O O > a) t ° E c > 0 > a) t o >, as s V m 3 > S) n O
'E Oi 0 m o n N a o m S N o o 3 a ` 3 '� > o To 2 Z O > ,-, C
u
w > as u
m :�°- w v _rn 3 - ai >p a T rn > > -°� °) E o ai o .° C w w 3
O o O1 m m m = o >-, `m o > in as .( .� 3 E .� 0 o N rn.3 o a o o > `O
d 0 (A -c . o0 'E 2 . (ft > u) > > (na0 v2i2 > E1(1035; NO1n -O N2
0 - u' n - u, w o a0i m a) o -p C > o u, 03 o (n > 3 m E 2 0
• Vi p 0)U _T U C N " Vl C 3 U ° 0 t a.O O Tts a) >
C V) U 0)U .- T O O ..-. E > .- C a• > (n O .. O o 70 > as C > a) N
O 'l U C -a N a rC -°O s Q '• 3 'E fl- a) F, .>— 0 U m 0 (`p N N > > O 0' a E
m
O 3 E o .� 2 w E o< .) c w Y aa)) .� n m m > _J A m .- `a .Lc .- O w ° °
> ctsE O V) 3 N T C
> y N O y > O p
tT- ° a) -O C -0 N C r U O
.� > O 00 3 C -0 g C O o 0 0 U 2 j o '3 0 — T A 0 > `°
W > 0 O1 m N C E S) > a `o c�i , ' - 2 S)11 ° E n w E U >
.�.. > O O O � „,2
) T'V O C > > V) .(n N V o V) a) O U V) S: U
O a) O 7 U U
2 y a) '� a)Fw C m 0)_2 2 C 0p V) ._'w y6 Q N 2 (6 C o LL `- E y0 N 0) C V a) N
atf cu (n U 5 .5 C D 3 2 rn O (n o O u a) E S: =o v n O -O a) . O o
`y U rn 0 E -o o f .S o -o > > o o .0 .3 > N T C s E o 0 o E u
2 E ii d &- m w Ei 2 E a 9 o a) o E m E o 0 3 C V) 8 o O O C E
O
ce N i N LL 7 V 0 5)s U E C Qp > (n N t C V°i y t > > E C > ` E (6 o V) (n C
dj E " v) � U 'p) ° ` ° '> t > o m p N 2 O ° r > E N U 00 O mCNI
w N ° >
CD H o co o n ° `o as p .'m O m O ° E O 3 0 T S) > S) 'u
_ V > -0 a) -0
V l3 (D N 2 0) 7 C U 'E(13 t )- > .0 c . a) > ••- 0 > > a) a a) OV y0 ... > T a) S) 0 70 Z
y 'C R i CD CD 0 al a N U .- N 0 .E > S: Q C U C U U c N .� .N N .�>. U o n N 3 a) U [
S 2 i w N i C .C_ C S: 0) 0 V) 0_ a) C 0 a) N V) > O > a) C 0 S) 0)-0 p in — 0 2
0 a 0 f/) �i 3 16 E o o 'O d w < 0 m o n 2 0 .� a.S r _1 o E ui r -0 o > m 2 g ( U i
o
s > o_c `o ` -O o o .N C) >3 o C r YC
'O
Er .5 o TO > oC
UEr w > > S2 ro U ° Oa) 7
n > O m A 2 0
u)u . 6 o m S o i o w > p u) S o 0.)o cn = o 32 • o S � OE • -oO
E N > o Ea oEV `O oOL > UE 2
otr000 > >. V oa O . 0 V) () 0 -O > l N O Q
(n o at o .N •E o S � V n m m E o . 2 o 0
• n > 0) 5 , 6 a) E2 TC Y ` S
01-a co
° .- U 'E OQt N �) a) N ' E > t 7c NV 'm T 'w a)pC a) 0 J N ' > U C C N ` U E 26 O '� la,.F >,U O (n (I) a U N ;
fn c co LE
I'
-6 C Og (n a) O N t p N N N +' >` C O > U Q C C N a) S) 7
• > > V) N Q V) 'N U o T E -O E > Q V O > > _ > O V C O (/)
U > a) V) O .� > > Q >• N — O Y -p > ,,.,>" ra > a U :N
U (6 p > U > a t a) j U 7 O X N p jp `O - E 0 -0 U -°
O 3 O oU -O 0 a `o m Q U in -O Q U U o S) 2 o E w E ° ° n o m 00 -
V
Tu
> o C -o
u E > p >
m
> - C ° t. > E V N 0 a) 3 c
O 7 O N c E a) ` 60 T' > t -0
O . U T O > > O E A a)T. 3 as No > E
n�i N 3 t > u, E aa)i n U t a E 3 `6 3 ° o -° o 0
•a) = E p N °O t C o O .°)-0 -O O o n > N N
i 6 a) o u, a a) C c -O . ^ m 3 -O (n 2 > O-
S X N > Q > a 0) N N > a) N O` O N O a) °_ (CD
S 0 > a) > � 6O c U -0 'Q 0) 6 C aa5 C
> V) °j U S:00 > Vi .>. E V > (6 0 N s0 O N
co (p > -0 S!
s U) 3 an Z2o > Qn .� < j
2 ii E 3 m o .- a 0
0
T ; E o Y o_ >
C
ju S c p E 0) a)
C as o V) -O m .5 . m
ca (r3 'm 'o 0 o s0> avi U
y V a N N C m> -0 C 4)
N V -0 C O J > C
i N c °p 0 0 _S! 0
CO V)al a0 w N ° °- N .� N 76 O U
N X (4 U .. �, a) E O O E o U O
LL LL n .r > a E > 'R > _ Z
LL l.L �_ i C U) t O N N U i6 O > U E r
m S 0 E > 2 - o C
s « « r 03 as t 3 m 2 -O a ° N ° >
�; y a>�i U w m u m O o U
(n 0 > J N- N (Ni (M 4 N lL t (0 r O 0) 2

0ID N. N. Z ti
co
°N O) a) > . a O
) 3 Y v C cl
O
• )o (n > O y a) T U '0 co -a N N ) 6> v o NO C `t > . m 'C s > ma O > >no )>> .E -° o C _a r
° > Q.N ° °oo •o ° o 0c ° 0 ai Et o• U o (a N 0 so (a wU U 0_N U mt O O s a) N -a a) ._ , Z
E > m -° o o o E v wv o E ` ° >o s Oo or E > `' ) D 2C i nr Ew• O1 °� T 0 o 'v, Cn E a >oo ° a) pC > o o (n V) C a) .4 Y
L Eza) > V a) O C > > -a p Q ° > V Q
O (n E E o g a)-0 o T CO o > O rn C > o y a U E
dO u > ° m a 6 LN O on D E a)
'O Cr) ° a TO n ° 0t . (0 .2 O To. CN O > O ° -2 o mN > E 0., a > C Co y
OE>' C ) N
O ON 3 -a v) v '` O >> Q S > Ua) 0 2>,.E) V) n 2 U O N V ...C7) > V C °Er .= > O ON >S > ° -° 2 > 2 �a) m -° mU > O a m . > - r E E E 2 > ° _a m a . a r m o i ai `m Q ai ._J E D mu
n >. _
n a) Y 0 0 t _ O
'O t O a) O E C O U V U > p) U
v) C
'c U -a u c Q ' o o ' g 2 .� ,o E r 3 'o 0
CD (a C y T yN. U > is N 7 ° 0 06 .N v) E O
CD a) C N u! E Q Q O O) 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) CI o OU N O)-° > _C Q a) C > Q' O ._ O C vi w -O >
a N u oNrn n - Y s) '> on or ° ° o O (nn o w> _ v) - _ , 'Y _ D a) o o a n
s
l4 mtE 7. ° 'v 2 na.) CA )
D.
12
O O ' 'C ° U • N > C U Cm6 CmN > 0 . o .a. N2 > NO 5 .> O _ j ._
°' O4 C _aN a C U 2O 2 C _a)VO0E) 0 O a) N C a) .- o -O ! C a a m 'u E .m >uEv )- s O n o ._ ,3 a) n a) 3 o a
• O 'aN ° S m
Y Cpa
0 -0 . (6 >, N o a a)° ° > > ° ° ( E r .6 > U a) C g) 3C > Un (a3U nN 3 .2atCn co n ( r > .— S nmo (o mE coEmy `o o . c m n o w o E 3 ° U
2 .2 •>, -b. ( o E
0 CD
C C > CO °` a) O C O 'Q
co 2
c.1)
>
U ° ` _.-° m
om N`o Nto' ... 6 Un Na)▪ a)• 7 -° oE `
-°
•
Qm U >co E _a o > s O � E o' c .N � ono ° Em � '� O E O � .'� .0 o)� 2a) •
ti
u > > = o aio � o 'a n u > _ a co
-ao ( CV U (O T 0 -O 3 + 0U � Y .E .2 N F ° � -° 'w NV E c -- 'a. -,2 & g D a Q m T�a) E O m o -° o s o oo .S O a r o o > ,Nr n ao mU o s ° =0 v C °? (n a o oa) o -° ` a E m . C ' `O a) ° . & 0tn n
Eo a) > o n rnrV) ° E ,, °; Y > > v03 nr ° o 8- > v U . o > . m a
O C -aY (p `° r ° O > >7r 'NUV v
_ ` oQ > V - N CC NC) O
E 3 U V) N N> O O N C C > ° t E U > C O N max co Ua) imm � jO a mE 2 3 Q U co a) o n WE30o s0
6
m _ao m.�
> 0 3 > a .° o o ° fn.
E `o > > S• > > a C > > = D rn - 3 -C
> m _ o ' > a (n o
M > o o ° a) o aO1i a) 2 > (n . 3 .S
> — C > U w T-O > > > O >
>` E> NoN > o ° t p) 32 a) a � O o. a o ao 0° v > r o t U °
U O > C > > '2 > r
(I))> v)V U > C E• C N ' II a3>` > a) M _aK r N .> O O co E O) O N(n O) co_ CO
W
-O O > N > N co T,-. > ?) >.C -O C C a) U a) 3
6
N N o '� u! s N '(3 3 N O s N 0O vi n — (n ' '�" U)) C a)a)
T :? s a->i E o '•°-- ° > m T.� 2 c v`6i E
> as > > E O E a) o .m w
U m Eno m a r =o n > no `a) ' n ° Z > > 2 2 0 o
O N
> N O` N N >.
U w
as
L > 3 S 7 01 C II13
a�+ t N TT) s` To (n
VO° C > Y ° U N TD
C > C a) > a) r C
0 Y �) S C > as
>, 2 n a) O aS O L
Y n o to) in a ° (�
S N N > C .T7). _° U > >
w U •> Q a) i O
o > o U 3 > E o O Z
Y cl >a) 0 01 O C ((n N 0 co
V
_ as
>
a) > v) > U m C t
m Q •
> a) te+
O O ° N M• > I I O
co rnrn .- a E 2 H

a)
O 0) Li) CO Nr Nr (.0
0
o; 0 E 3 ' c U EE))L ( o S: v CI
c
r cl ° � � 602. . ( E
`o 5' o o oS m E ym .N 3 of
ii > p o T m E rn a E ° ° 0 — U
CI m p a) °-m U) `2 E ° s 0 °) 3 U > U -O rn
a) O) U N U V S! > a) a) p C (0 U C C
-' O O O a) t O E o > 0 > as t o >, a) s v m 3 > S) n O
.E Oi 3 m) n N o f m g N o ` ( o . a 8 3 .� >• o '> o 0 O• O Oi
u
o m N . o T m w E ur'°-> E °O p -2 > 2 as m s O U • c a
co w O (1 u
" m :F w vi _r) 3 ai-op a 2 T rn O a) m —. °� E E o ai o .° a) v) w 3
O O1 m m _ s `m > iA as .� .� o N mg .3 o a o o >. `O
d N (A E o ai '- w cc G) > 0 a Nam v2i . a) E 8 N rn n 'p N
• Vi p O)U _T U C N " Vl C 3 U ° ca t 0 .0 O 5 To• a) a)
C 5 U O)'O .- T E O y c ° .- 0 Q a) a) O -. O ow a) 'O O E a) C 0 n a) (`6
w � o o v) n O o N O rn o 0 3 r o a o a) & E O .m
o I' ° ° S) m Tc o s a `2 '• 3 .E ,9 as g .>_ 0 U rn O c� o °� o a E
m
O m E o .� m w E o< cam) c w Y aa)) .� n co m > J n m — a) .cc = O LL ° H °
cn N T
N N E O u! 3 N T
> y N O y a) O p
.> > O Cp .3 C -O c C 0 o 0 0 V 2 n o c.
'3 0 — T n 0 0 -6
W O m O1 m co S) > m `m o S) ° E n w E 2 co o a) 0 n
0 1E )) p O O` E T.� ID)
O O a) > U) .N a) (n 0 O VVl 0_ u! 0- O O 7 U U
^2 R E -O p) vl _2 N 7 ._'N N E fl- N V) (p C n LL E v) O) -O U a) (0
v) 8 5 .° E D 3 o O .N m O (n a) 8 a) E S: =o v n O -O a) .E r
.0 a) L v ° N E 3 r > C T U C S) E a) v a)
At) U rn E o 0 E . a`) -o a) O U - .E L O as > o o E
d &- m w Ei ° E a o a) o f `� E o 0 3 2 g a) o O o
_ o a
.. d ` Q LL ° t o ? E ° m a`6i m o v m E m E 0 2 `a) `o `m 2 o a) i
Cl) a >, V) .E U .Ea o > S 01 O - 2 0 - r N O m w N a)
i_ C� a) H O rn o n ° `o as p 0 -_T'm O m p O ° E 0 0 T s O s 'v
_ VCo a) _O a) -O
c. c 0 -. 2 - o C 0 .coE -0 a) .0 a) a) N a) a) 16 Q a) OV p -' a) N T O S) ct Z
Cl) .- .- i a a) U .E N N .E a) S: Q C U C U U c N .c .N '� N r U o n N 3 a) U [
S Y i a+ N N C .c_ S: N vl 0_ a) C 0 a) vl N O > a) 0 o_S) O)-O O N - 0 S
0 a 0 f/) li 16 E o o 'O d w < 0 m o n 2 cam) .E a.E r _1 o E li r -a o > m 2 n C () S
a) —_
r `o ` -O 5 o .N C) O o s ° o (n °
E r .E cs w vo T o 22 m 3 r o U ° O . .00i
avi .0 a`6i E r m > o i o w n O o m n o co
p N 7 S! '6 C a) 0 l0 S! O O)N (n 7 a) (D
II) S E T (� E •o as o E v o o arn) > c)(„ E 2
(o n r O o rn o > w O as o .E (° u as u o > O > )i °� o Q
U) o a t o .N o .E o S:• '1 v n m m E o . as 2 o 0
• u o D > v a) E 2 >, Y S)
'a _° U •'m'E O Q ca t N �) N N N T N 3 '7 N E N 0 Q 0c1 c N
a) O)J U C ` (6 a) ' 'w a)
p C U O N '3 O > (n N (n '(6 U C 0 U > E C 0 O .E S r c Y >.
E ° a) E o c ,'O a s ' _ a) a) a E as rn E o p a)
(p -p g O .� N a) D O o D a>) 0 N N .) +' >` C O > U Q C C N a) S) 7
C (a U y6 u! p a u! 'N U o T E -O E a) fl_ V O > a) _ a) O V C p (I)
'cN .N' Eav'i '°) . ,_ 0 aio > (D . ' � a) a..7 vrQ � > o3 N .E rn
U N a) u! O . a) a) C s > a) '- O Y U a) T _a a) Q ca)) .N
U (6 p a) U a) _° , p-t a) n U 7 O X N O ) N `O a) E S) -O U _°
O 3 O1 U -O a) a `o m Q U in -O Q U U a) S) 2 o E LL E ° ° n o m O m
v
Tu
o c(,12
) E O-o O p
m o u
'6 u! as
p O a) O_ 00) -p S) N S) 2ca0 p > T -
O _ , O }, o E v Vl co a) 3 c
O O
O Q O N • E ( V U T' O ? C 'O
— jn a) -. .0_ r N a)sa Q w n a) N 2 a) C as
++ O . U T v, t > T u E >,.> 2 oo O E
(�.i N 3 r O u aXi t a E 3 `6 3 ° o ° o 0
•4) 16 0 17)• °- ° as . -O s n m 3 -O (0 a) ai Q
S X N O Q a) °- O) N N O (0 N O N 0 0 O_ (N6
W N U N C .a) a) a p v) '5 u! a) O a) ° LL u! O
:be'
4O a) a) a) � v) O c U U 'Q N O °- a) 3
y) a) V) °> 7 U S: N i/i • r N E V a) N 0 0 s0 `p N
n a) a a) m .- U)) .> m 0 — o S: U n ° a) E
ca (p a) O -8
s (n 3 an z2o > Qn .� < j
2 LOL E 3 m ° .- a u)
N
3 _
7 U E c o E rn a) la
a) .o a) • as .°_ m
ea 'Fs 'o U 0 _aO> Q v ,
y V a a) N C m> U C U
a1 a U j cO J a) a)
coa) >' w (I) C U aE a) . >'6 0 U
mi N f/) S N V) N (0 E s Y N
rw-CE o '=o
X (3 r as o E o 0
n _
LL LL . i 0 CO S: U N N U a) O > U (6 r z
S ° ° E o E i ° °
s « « r 3 2 -O - ° o O
�; CO a�i U w m u -, m O o 0 iii
(n 0 > -IN- N N M V N LL _Q (c) N O O) 2

O (al
` N Y O) Y U T-(3 a) N V V -0 C _c °N 0 O) U) a) . C U)) > V C
O
)ov) > O y ' NTU ' co _Q -a N N ) 6> V o N (.0 C `t . 0m 'C o mm O a) >o ) n
• >> > 0 .E -° o C s -co 3 Q.N ° pOo ° O oC '° 0 N U) Vj E t• U O (6 0 8 U) Uco § U °-
N U t O O _0 N , -O U) ._ o ._ Z
E a) m > ° o o
Ea 2 C
su
wv o E o ° o s Oo or E > `' ) , 2C i nr Ew• CL O1 °� T o0 u Cn E m oo
o 0 m pC > o o (n V C m .4 U) Y
L EzU) 0 V co C U) U) 16 p a ° U V) 2,5
O u u E E 0 g 0.,-0 0T CO o o O co C o o y m U E
d O > ° m m 2 L IO o n 0 E m
S ° CO ° m T rn n ° Os ._ N 2. O o o a o U o °2 omN 072E .3.) a > C Co m '-- (` N> rC0 ' ` OE ° j C O 6
O- 0t (0 O (pyO
>' 0 O 'U -a V V .` O ()N `) UO U UU) 2 2>,.� V V C U 6 C ) V O U) V C °E '5 .= UO) 0V1 Fr o ° ° V g V �(o O -° mU > p a m . U - r f E E 2 > ° _m m D . ar m o U U (`o Q CD ._J ED mu
>. _
n (0 Y 0 0 -C _ O
'O t O co O E C O V V U U) p) O
o C
'( U -0 V c Q ' o o ' g ;Li .� ,o E r 3 'o 0
U) ,p C y T yN. O > O o N 7 ° 0 0 ° 'V) ) E o
O) U) C N (n E _a a O COO) 3 U U) O C
O U) -O U U) N OU N m U U) _C 0- U) C a) r- O .- O C Vi VU) -0 N
.r.. >, (6 .N OU 8 _aU,.T. _0_ O O 0 O• V) s 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u
l4
LL u, -° in- ° '° ° o (cc)). -° Y 00 vi ° '° E m _° -° u, rn a`))
o °, m C o w o 0 0 a. °w o > m or '5 o ° .0 4,n• ° o
m ' o m
-6 N C U -.N y0 U) T-6 N U) co U) Y V) ° U co U) U) _a E _a
V O 0 0 0 O a) N C U) °' 0..... •C 0 -0 .!.. s N (Cp C > O)ff U C U) O .� V) C -6
u E V, )- s m 0 n o _ 3 CI) a a) 3 o Q ° `° E 0 C rn ns m s. E .m o
-° ° U) Vim) ° O° E • Or .° N C C C S Y -0 . (6 T • Y N N
2 ° t C ° U 0 (6 E (6 a) U U) .a) a) C m 3 C > U ,6 N U U 3 C
in n o o n m c E o cn L0 E r m y `o o .S n 03 m n o w o n E co 3 n o ° U
-b. V o O>,,CD
W ° C O 'Q0
C C > E E 67 V) V) (5 r `C 0 t
• o O m
(o E s > ▪ o o s `O m U U) 0 o E o Q
' 0 . 0 O E O .' _ o) o
u > = o o n o a0i o E o '� 3 .� u m 2_ a) ) .0
N 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 ,..-• U) U .� Y T. N N E V) N E () ,r)
V ms o E r O c 'a. o E 'Q 0- ° -0 w N
o & 0 , m
p vm) oUo so °° (5 ° aro 'o > ,Nrn aE 3 m 7o T
C9 O C °? a) V, a) o N a� -0 `Oar o ,U o) Os a�
o CO m o o 0 0 0 .. & 0 t n E m N r o .5 'o o _a =
E a u V, U n rn .r v) > ° E ai U; Y > U) V, 0 3 cn
co
r ° o ° U) O o .S m m Y E
C S Y O-0 Tlo `° 7 Or .� Vim`) V) U) V) - (3 > C C N 0
> O OU N C C r 0 •-° t E U O C o o_ O E C 3 C U vl t N (`') N N
O m n aa)) m c E o 2 3 Q U U _a 0) aa)) o in m m � w E 3 _c
0 o N
s j
o D
m s o c m m.� 7Tu
°� 0 3 n a) a .° 'a. o ° .N g o
E `o N T °• o o o o .�to D rn m a r s
M > o 0 0 m o aO1i m oCT CD 3 3 .S
.' () Co 'O . O)_O (p y U) CO t C U a E O a) II N
C > U) N U) o N O . N o t p) >` E
° v >,r o f �° 0 0 a o ° o -a o 3 0
-0 O U) C a) U) C U r
. N C � N> V)V U U) C E• C N ' II 6K >` U) U) co.. .> O O (6 E O O n C O) _ tCO
W (Dv)
-0 O U) N U) N O T,-• > ?) >. -0 C C U) U U) 3
6
co
N (� o ,- U) s N N 3 N O s N 0U)n N am" N c N
m m m > E 0 2 0 0 .m w
U m E n° m a r =o n > _a `m ' n ° z > > 2 2 0 o
C
O N
0N Y ` N N >,
U w _
co
L N 3 01 ClEt
S 7 II
6 O) COn as
VO° CO C U) Y ° -6 U) TD
C U) U) U) () +' C
Oa Y �) S 0 C > as
>, 2 (n C a) O U) U L
7 Y S O o) N O- II U
S N N 0 C -co c
U > U)
w U > N Q U) i O
o o U 3 0 E o O z
Y ca > 01 O C N N 0 V
_ ctso co
m co
> V) > ° m 2 D C r
m Q ' U) U) te+
O O ° N M• O II O
co rnrn .- a E 2 H

a
0 0) in CO 0)
3 C 2 m LL O S: V m T.
r c' ° � � Y c' C I...`o m o oS m E rm .N S' of U > p in c T m a) S rn a E o ° 6) - U
CO 2 O a) a m o `-' E ° E s o v a) 3 a > ` 0 -O rn
a) N O) U N U V S! > r a) 6) p C 16 O C C
" g O 0 O 6) t o f > u > 6s E o >, 6) . v rn 3 > S) n 0
'E Oi a ni o n N o f E N o ` ( o .3 °- 0 .0 >. o > 0 Z 6s O Oi
OV m (n . ` (n ° .' c - Y °
C UF, > 6 6) a =
U o (6 '- E U � °�m ° w i oO6rn E 2 U C a) 3E .o 0 o .° (nw:E w v rn 0 a T O O -° a NOOmm = o ` o > 6 .r2 .� 5 .c o) 3 o >, `
a 1 m o sm in o
0- u! (A s 6 'E 0 E_c ou) > o Nam U) E o a 5) A 'p N
v nw (n w ° m n ° g °
(n- p O U T U Co Ni — N 3Uo '
O o as od o > 3(n EU O m cn
Eo 6)
_ - 0 toO u) 6 t a ao
C 5 UO)U - >, O .5 Co ° . na a ..o N . O a) o O a) E 6C N 6) E
3 -c oa° 61 a (n .mw° 5o Os v) O 6 O rn ° soa°Eo I' g S � T2 -2
Q mm' .Ea) � - o U c-`! Eo = o
O Eo . E w E o< ) w Ya) . nom > co A m - 6) . O LL H
E o (n 3 N T C
> y N O y a) O p
.� > O Cp •3 C -O C O o 0 0 UEct$ 2 j0 o '3 0 - T A 0 )) `°
W O m O1 m N 0 a) S) > m `m o S) ° E n w E E co O m n
O r a) O O O E V T'V O C a) > 2 1 ate) 6) V O V) 6) O U V) S- U
O 6) O 7 U U
y '� N O)s N C p u) '_'w y6 Q N N 3 C 7 LL — E — N O) U a) N
..5 a) (n U 5 .. a_ D 3 rn O u, o a) V a) E S: =o v n O -O a) . 6s
`y of rn u E o o f .S o O O of a>) ,E 3 O o T 12 m s 8 o o a) u
d m w E a o o a) E E `� E o a) 3 u 6s ° O '13
o
O
a. N i LL 7 U m s U C �p > (n m t C V°i y > o E C O ` E (6 N N N C
dj E Q : V) •� cam) 'p) 0 ` ° '> - a) 6) p) p N 2 O t r O E N -° 0 O m w N 0 0
CA O a) H (n rn 0 in a `O 6) p 0 E.-T. 'm U C '5 'O -p p E v o 3 0 T s ° n 'u
_ V a) _O 6) -O
V lC N 2 01 7 C U 'E oo -a a) .0 y6 6) a) N 6) a) 6) a 6) OV p ," a) 6 T O S) 6) a Z
V) •C •l4 i CD CD 0 co a a) U .— N N .E a) _. Q . U C U U c N .. .N 'C N r U o n N 6) U C [
S Y i w N N C .0 C S: N u! a 6) C 0 0 16 u! a) O N 6) C a S) a) -O o in '— 0 2
O a O U) )i E ° o '() d w < cam) m o n 20 ..� a.S r _1 o E LOL r -a m > m 2 S C U 1
a) -_
y p ` -O N C .N C N O _. . O (n C
E r .5 o w >,0 a) o m 3 ro U ° O . .00i
N U N E y N N N > di in S! U O N 7 0 n a) O m A a) O u)
p S) -o O p u) S) o co o cn '5 a`) 3
0 (1oS u E T6) E :o 2 6s a o E v o o 'al) > c)(„ E 2
(a n r O o rn O > w E O 6s o .E 6s u 6s u o > O > a °� o Q
(n o a= o .N o C 2 .F o S: 'o v n m m 2 o • as 2 o 0
u a) D > u 6s E >, Y S)
O) a) O)y, O _
V _° U U 'm'E O Q N _c t N C1 N N N a) T N > '- N E I a) Q C1 c N
6) O)J U C ` (6 6) ' 'w 6)
p C U O N '3 O > (n N u) '(6 U C N U ; E C 0 0 .� S.�.. Y 7,
E Oif) E E t . ,'O a . O a) a E m o, E o p m a)
N -p O � u! 6) O O N a>) p N N +' >` C) v OCV > 'O Q C C N 6) 7
C U y6 u! N a N .N U O T E -O E a) Q V O > a) _ a) O V C O (/)
N � N '+�—' _ " 0 C 6 O a) C Vim) O 2 N.o v t Q > 0 3 .N E Ca
U O 6) N O . a) a) C S > N — O Y -p a) >, To a) a U :N
U (6 p N U a) -O a t 6) j U 7 O X N o > N `O 6) E S) -O U _°
0 3 O1 U -O 6) d `o E Q U in -O Q U U aa)) S) 2 o E LL E ° ° n o m 05 -
-6 E
v
Tu
O 6) o p 0
m o u E O
'O (np O (.5a C1 -p S) N S) 2 a) > >, —
O - c ° t. a) E V in co 6) 3 c
O
M 7 O N C E u! N T .- ° a) C '6
u O •aa)) • r O a) a w O E 6s 0 a)
N -- 'O _c C U T )- N U a) >, (n E >,• 3 6) NO a) E
a) '3 O N c a) m 2 t o_ E 3 `6 S o o -° o 0
N CD D_ _Q 0 ° C o °) t 2 O A a) N
S V . N O (`)O) °- " 6) c 'O .9.
A m 3 '6 (A a) a) O'
_ ° a Ill C) W 2 -O u C .a'11). ° o � w N C) � O .`p OL°L n -0.
3
(6 ai 2 CA C > > rn>• a) U)o m E V E `° o O O O a)
n a`) E r a) o .- )) .>_ o O o u) S n E E
s ° O a) O o -o -OS) w
$ U) 3 an z2o > I
.� < o2 L°L E3 m o .- a u)
a) N
>. a)
to .0 c O m VOi -O m '5 .a0 S) oQ (n c m -p 2O J a) C
coco
co >' w u) C U o_ a) .) >'6 O 0
a) .+ O U r (
r
. (n S 6) V) r , 61 E C `p S) Y a)
N X (4 -O .- �, 6) E O O E o U O
LL LL CO .. a) a E O 'R a) _ z
LL LL i 0 co S: U N N U 16 O > U 6) r
E E S E O E
E s v « « r t m E O ° n a O
�; y N lL U w m u _, m O o a N
(n 0 > J N- m N M 4 N lL sa c0 r O co 2

cp
O N. a) co Z CO
00
co
-O N VN) V) -6 C y Y C V) O) > T C
o .� O yN. N 0 O) U) N . ° C (6 O) V) C O)
> V) o N N O C `t N .T U '0 3 co s s N N O) cp (6
0 m 0
o o >>) n > '3 0 .E -° o C m '2 s -c 3 m .Q.N ° >
0 O
O • ° O T y U o C CO '° 0 0 Q o 8 VN) U) Vj E t N p
N U t O O s N , -0 N ._ (6 ._ Z E Y U U U °-
Vi O C N E a) N >-° (6 N O O o E U V) 'n V)
C ,� `o -° r o s r E o > `' c) D 2
o 0 LU 0 n .N ° O1 0 N 0 0 0 '0 C n E m o
0 m C > o o C m .4 C u,
L E z N 0 V 0 C U) U) p -6 p Q V) V) N U) V) N Y
O u u E 0 E 0 o a)-0 0 ° 0 o x Y °
O > ° m 0 O rn C 0 0 y m U
0 0 u 0 m 2 L O m 0 E m E
d s .E N N r O o o `-° o U) o I� o n E ° Cr) ° m T rn ai ° O
12 o m 0 73 E 0) a > C Y C ° o y m •-- n n m
co '- `0 ,t„ > O O E > o >.r_ (Cp y > O) °U j C O j (` - N
T.� V) N V) N U >'10 O 3 s V) V) .E () ` U) O U 2 (6 .-. 30
E r .= a) O) Y 00 V1 '6p N i° N V1 O U) V) C O O N U) a) U) U) V) g V)
(o (o O -° m U > O a m .g U) -o r 0 E E E 2 0 0 ° ° 0 u �_
J E D m m D u . a r m o io Uri (`o Q a>) ° .-
>. _
n E Y 0 0 -C _ O
'O t O 0 O E C O V V U U) p) O
o C
'T) U -0 V c Q ' 0 0 ' g 2 .� ,o E .(5
3 'o 0
N (p C y T yN O > O N 7 ° 0 06 'V) ) E o
O) (L$ C N V) E _a Q O COO) 3 U N O C
O U) -O U N CI N OU N O)-0 U) _C 0- M C N Q' O .E O C Vi w -0 N
.r.. >, (6 .N O• U c00 s U,.T. -6 O O 0 O• V) s 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u
Y m E w t E •_ D 7. a) ° Uc) CA'v)7. o 2 n' o a n °9 s
l4
LL u, -° in- ° '° ° 0 `O 3 -° Y 00 vi ° '° E m -• ° -° u, rn a`))
(6 C N (o U) O O o C 0 2O > N Or '5 ° .° 4,n U) j C �_ U C
m ' o mco
-6 N C U -.N y0 N T-6 U) co U) Y V) ° U co U) U) _a E _a
V O 0 0 0 O a) N C (6 °' O.,.4- C 0 -0 •!.• s N coC C > O)ff U C N O .� V) C -6
u E u )- s m 0 n o _ 3 CI) n a) 3 o Q ° (6 E 0 C rn 0 m 0 ' E .m 0
-° ° U) Vim) ° O° E • Or .° N C C C C S Y -0 . (6 T N t$ N
2 ° s C ° 0 m E m 0 0 U) .a) a) C rn 3 C 0 U m N o U 3 L.
in n o w n m c E o cn L0 E r m y `o o .E n cn m n o w o n E co 3 n o ° U
T O V o O)
0 CD
C C > W °` C O C O 'Q
m -0 V) V) (5 °? E C ' 0 E O C m s
E > I� N > N C .� O N • (p t C 0_ ° N OU N U'
0 0 to' �-o ° n UO1i m a) ' -0 E ° ° _T m
0 _ _ 0 m
�oE s > o 0 s `O m U U) 0 ° E 0 Q
0•. 0 o E o _ rn o
u > = o o n o a0i o E o '� 3 .� u m 2_ a) ) .0
N 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 ,.... N U .� Y T. N N F tc;0 U) E 16 (r)
-0 -0 o Ea) 0 c —— 0 � � 0 � E 'Q 0 ° � 0 w N
o & 0 o m
O vm o ° o 0 °° g ° a o 'o > ,N r n a E 0 >,
C9 O C :? a) V, a) o N a� -0 `Oar o ,U o) Os a�
o CO m 0 > o 0 0 0 . & 0t n E m N r o ,E '460), o n` =
E 0 u V, U n rn .r > ° E ,, U; Y > 0 V, 3 cn
r ° o ° U) (o o o .E m mY E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U Vim`) V)▪ U) V) .E (3 > C C N 0
> O O° N C C r 0 -° t E U a) C o Q O E C 3 C -6 V) t co S (`') N N
O m n 0 m c E o 2 3 Q U U _a a) aa)) o co m m � W E 3 _c
0 o N
s j
o -
m s o 2 m m.- 7Tu
°� 0 3 n a) a .° o o ° .N g o
E `o N T °• 0 0 a C 0 0 . D rn m a r s
M > o 0 0 m 0 aO1i m 0CT CD .`>)
3 3 .S
... () Co ') . O)-O •(p ..-. U) CO t C U Q E O a) II N
C > (6 N 9 o N O . N o t p) >` E
° v > o r �° 0 0 a 0 ° o -a o 3 0
7 O U) C a) U) C U r
45
K >` N > V O (6 E UO N U) C > E• C ).0 '� (I)) 0W ... U) . 0 o O) — (p C O) U) N _ M t II as
-0 O U) N 792
) N O T,-. > ?) . -0 C E C N U N 3
6
co
N N O '- U) -a N '(3 3 VO) O s N 00 v,n N am" U) c N
m m m (ii > E 0 2 (o o .m w
U m E n° m a r =o n > n° `m • n ° z > > 2 2 0 o
C
O N
U) a) Y ` N >,
U w _
L N 01 Cla
S 7 II
6 O) ( COn as
V O° C U) Y ° 1
6 N TD
C 0 E co 0 (o r c
0 Y �) S C > as
>, 2 N C a) O U) U L
7 Y S 0 o) N 0- II (�
S N N 0 C -co c
U > U)
w U > N Q U) i O
0 0 o U 0 E O z
Yco
co > 01 O C N N 0 V
_ 0 co
m > V) > ° m 2 D C r
m Q N co te+
O O ° N M• a) II O
oo rn 0 .- a E 2 H

a)
O u.) co a) co O O
> U To N t O -i N •Y N N r u) C • C
2 0 > m o O s m E r m .N 3 t o t
'U > C -p in C T (6 N E. rn a E O N ° (a U
C O a) a 1 N N `—' E O c 0 V a) 3 N > ` 0 '6 0)
a) 0) U •N U V S! > a) N p C a) U C C
O O o a) t O E c > u > a) t o >, a) s V m 3 > S) n O
U O1 O S N 0 t c a) N p C C O .3 a N '� >. O 'v) 2 Z a)• a) U C
u
O o N (n .E O T N (n a) ur ( E c - -a p c -a > N a) a) s a) c0i 13 N 7
w o a) u
&- :.--- co — .- (n _rn 3 — ai-2 a 2 T a) ) o m — O E E o ai o .° w w 3
O O1 m m _ s `m > iA a) .� .� o N CD.3 o a o o > `O
20- . ° N N C N E 0 n O) n -a (
V) u t Ei 'C 2 -3 wt -° mu) > a 2. V4Q 5 > m .� U a)
-• 6u tm 0i) n T U Co Ni v u3 Ui O m a) oo (n 2 o U
pU _ - C OO 2a) t -rn Ea. O aa
C () U0)Uo T O .5 ca .i n a O o H o . Oo 0 7 N a C () a N
3 o oa a O .m
mw5 m 2 o L ' Y p< aF, > rn a rs mao ,c Sa o s a ° .Ea) .-0) o U 2) C-`! Uo ° o
O E o . m w E o< ) c w Y a) .� n m > J n m —
CI . = O w o
(/)
> T
N O )
— CV >, CN N E O
O> r C p
-0 C -p OT' ` o U `°o0U o O >, n 0 a
0 4-
. m ....7.
s EE U) ;. O t UO E ' a 0
o `m -O m ( CO m
13 cUO a OE r E
w E U a) a) .o () a) 'N S o S) m m O Un O OV U V S UO u) a) Oy - 00O � u T _ UC• Na) > QNa O Cou aw a O7OO
W .- ( (ti C p ( .rn_. C N2To LL cE u) CO) 2VNoNy S =o V n O O o .at ` N U m .S 3 � oS oO0o O ,E 3 0 o T ms0 E ar. Urn u, E `
mw E f . o 0 i cE La a o ` _ o 3 a o ° o
u
0 C is d os > C $ m o E o . O
OE NNN T.6E O ( N O ONQi 7V ` C p ( a• t C C
u) U 'p 0 ` .> C a 'p 0 ) 2 0 C r E N3 O m wT S o s 'y 0 =o - rn o i a O a p .E . ( UmD -O -p 0 0 �
CD I— V C O a O a) -O
_ c3 E U17 U ' _2 a aa a N () a a a s Vp a) -2 T O S a -a Z
CD CD 0 al a-NU0 a) 7 N N NU) N n N Ua) U8 CC al i (3) .— v) 'E a S Q C C UU C . .N C O pi — p2S Yw N 1-6 C .CC S m (3., (wa ammC pa N v) a) > a liU isc` o >O
0 a 0 CO i 3 E o 'O d < ) o n 2 0 . a. r _1 E • 2 n Cc U S
a)
s rn> o_C `o ` -O 5 o N 2 o o C > r c
E r .S m o 0 'O 2 .° O
U Er mwC 02 w .2 n o Om n o ,_ 1a)
u)u . 6 N 7 S > o _ai o a) p cO S O O)a) (n U n 32
o ° ° E di aC
E >w oao E a oE V Ou o O.) • °) UE 2
o nr O O rn o _o> oo o . O '-'-a' (,'2 N N o Q
7 U (n 8 o_ .N CC .— U S1V n N N o 2 0S 0
• 0) u 0) arn > u a1E2 O _>, Y O
a co
U UUc'E `O Q N t r N g Te; NN '° E) EN (D CC N'a . T 'w a)pC a) 0)J N ' U C ` U E C (6 0 '� S.� as �UO O (6UC Na ' ; E m o, E o ,
a)
E ° u a °tO N . p N .N_ o +o' a>` C O > 45 CNp oS
O > U Q_ a) OC V aCO 7p p C p y6 u! To 2 a n .N U o >. E • E U) Q V (I)
NN) � a' ° � `n 2ao a) o22g Vim ° V2a2 > o3 .2 . rn� O . NOa o � > N — OY 'a-p u) r a) a UE NU (6 a o N U a) S Q Na) U aa j p 7 O p > j ` >"' E S -O
Oa) oca U :
O 3 O 0 -O a a o mQ U i -O Q U U a) S 2 o E wEoon
O m
V
TD
3 o C o p O
mo u, E o '
'6 c p 0 a) a m -0 s N s 2 p > T
o - C ° t. a) E V n co `° 3 c
0 0
M Q p N E E (6 U U T O ? 0 C 'O
.�.. jn C a) r yaa)) r N O a's n a) CI N
-p U T u, -O > T u, E >,.> O No E
N 3 r O N CD t a E 3 m 3 o 0 > o 0
U S! O t C o °)-p t -O N o o n a) O N
E a) o o u
0) a) a N N• O` O N O O a as
W N in U C in 0• U () n N 0) O O p v O
4O t a) 0 a) (/) O c u '6 'Q N O C E s C
T a) u! > > U t N in. .0. N E V a) (6 p a) O C.
N
CD n N a 0 a) N .D N .>_ C N VOl N u) 7 S: U n C a) E
NI ca N 6 S)
CD CO 3 an Z2o > Qn .� < o2 ii E 3 c ° CO u)
i _ N
T a)
C > E 5 Y - a
C 'U C C p E p) a) la
7 i a) as Eas
C °-
ea (3 'm '-es _a• 0> Q N
y V _ N N C m> U C a)
a) V -O '> C O — a)S) ca C
CLI i co C OO N N 7 _ > 0
co
a) � 'O U E U a a) .� N 2 v) C.)
r
E O o
X -O •. a E a) O o 0
LL LL �_ i C fn S: U N v U 16 0 > U (6 u! z
S: C C E a) - oo
s « « r m O a -O o a 0 a)
�; CO R C/ C j U w m u -, m O o m
(n 0 > J N- N N Cc) 4 N lL _2 c0 N O 00 2

cU
O CO CO CO Z 00
co
N Y O) > T-O a) V (I) 'O C y °N O) a) > . C O V - O)o > O y
> z CI cn as 2 La >
C > •
poS 2 YC 7
sO
° O o '° 0 N a) Vj E t• U C O (6 N 0 Q 8 (p wU U QN U t O O s a) N -a a) ._ , Z
E > m -° a) 'a o E V wv o Eu ` ° >o s Oo or E > `' ) , 2C i nr Ew.N O1 °� T u0 U 'V, C n E a >oo. 0 ° 0 0 pC > O o (n V) C a) .4 Y
L NOa) > V a) O C > > U p Q ° > V) Q
O u u E 0 E o g rn ° oT CO o > O rn C > 0 y a U E
dO 0 u > ° C m a 2 LN O on D E a)
'O O ° 6 TO n ° Ot . ,n .2 O N C N O > O ° y - (`2 0N 0 73 E rn a > C Y C o
> rC O NO ` OE j .2 > _
OVj " t > O (pyO
>'-O O ' S V) V '` O >> O > a)O > Ua) U 2>,.E) V) (n aU Lc) a) (n O > V C °E .= a) O) ON > > ° -° V g V �a) r -° mU > O a m . > - r E E E 2 > ° _asm m D . a .,3 m o U a `m Q ai ._J E D mu
n >. .E.n a) Y 0 0 t _ O
'O t O a) O E C O U V U > p) U
o C
CD 412 a) C N (n E _a Q O CO 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) N OU N O)-° > _C Q a) C > Q' O ._ O C Vi w -O >
.r.. >, (6 .N O• U c00 s U,.T. '6 O O O O• V) s 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u25
Y m E w t E •_ D 7. a) ° ac) CA o 2 n' 0 o a n w s
l4
LL u, '° in- ° '° ° 0 `O2 . -° 0 Y 00 vi ° '° E m '• ° -° u, rn a`))
(6 C > (o > O O o C N 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C �_ U C
m ' o m
V O 0 0 0 O > N C a) °' O.,•�.• •C O -O .a. �.. s 0 (Cp C > O)ff U• 0 > ,a O .� N C U
u E 2 )- s a) O n o _ 3 rn a a) 3 o Q ° (° S m C 0) O m s. E .m >
_° ° > V>) ° O° E • Or .° N C S Y U . (6 T • Y N a) a)
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U > .— a) C g) 3 C > U (6 N U C 3 C
m n o w n m c E o cn L0 E r m y `o o .S n 03 m n o w o n E 3 3 n o ° U
>,, -b. (n o 2
0 CD
C C > W °` coO C O 'Q
0 _ _ 0 as
�o E _c ▪ to (3.) s `O mU 2 > > E > Q
' > . m 2 O E O .' _ ) o
u > = o o n o a>i o E o '� .� u 2_ a) ) .0
> 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 .+�-, a) U .� Y T. N N E V) > E a) co
-0 -a o E r 0 . -- 'a. -2 � 0 � E 'Q a ° � ° w N
o & o D as
p 0 o -° o s 0 oo S ° a r o 'o > ,N r n a o m m '� T
C9 O C :? a) (n a) o .N a) o -° `O a o .0 .- m O s °
o a) > o ° o o . & 0t n E m Nr o .5 '460), o n` =
E 0 u V, U n rn .r > ° E ,, °; Y > > V, 3 cn
r ° o ° > (o o o .S m `' Y E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U V>`) V)▪ > > V) - (3 > C C N O
> O O° N C C r > _° t E .3 > C o Q O E C 3 C U V) t N S (`') N N
O m n ax) m c E o 2 3 Q U U _a a) aa)) o in m m � W E 3 0 o N
s j
0 6
m s (nm.�
E `o > > S• > > a C > > = D rn -a) TD 3 -C
> m _ o ' > a (n o
M > o o ° as 0 aO1i as 2 ') (n 0 3 3 .S
> - C > U w T-O > > > O >
>` E> NoN > o ° t p) 32 a a � O o a o ao 0° v > r o t U °
U O > C > > '2 > r
N C C � (I))> V)V U > C E• C N ' I 6>` > a) M K r (Dv) O a) E O) O an O) _ tCO
W
-O O > N792
N co T,-• > ?) >.C -O C C a) U a) 3
6
N N o '� V) s N '(C) 3 N O s N 0O Vi n - N . '�" U)) C N
T :? s a->i E o 0 '•°-- ° > To
0 T.� 2 c co E
> as > > Eo E as o .m w
U m Eno m a r =o n > no `m ' n ° z > > 2 2 0 o
O N
U w
L > 3 S 7 01 C IIla
VO° C > Y ° U a) TD
C > C a) > a) r C
0 Y �) _a -.E. > as
>, 2 n a) O a) O L
S N N > C T7). _° U > >
w U > Q a) i O
o > o U 3 > E o O z
Y cl >a) 0 01 O C ((n N 0 co
V
_ as
>
a) > V) > U m C t
m Q > a) To
O O ° N M• > I I O
co rn 0 .- a E 2 H

a
o '1 M x— N M N M
E 3 ' C c iL 0 E ° U _c 0)
(a a) y w
• Cr ` m m E rm .N 3 o5 f U > _co o m o ° Srn 0_ E O ° 0 - U
O O > °- N T ' E O C -
) 0 a) 3 N > U -0 6
)
a) > 6) U .N Uv) N S > - > a o a -C ` C C
v °C S nO O > a t O m > 0 > a t o >, a s ° rn° °'E i di onN omn ow . >, o .N 2 Z n' ° )
Cu (3 f
w ° a) u
m :w w v _rn 3 - ai >6 a T rn ° ° -°� ° E o ai o .° C w w 3
O a O1 m m 3 = •
c s `m o > (n (6 .Es P .� cc E .� c o N rn.3 o a o o > o
d N (n _. = O` N 'C 2 U 2 t ° (n '> ° N (n Q N N C > N N O) n -O .'� v) 2
0 D) vi - n - u, w o a0i m ,n a) - S -p C > o u, ,3 o 2 > 3 m E 2 a)
• Vl 0 6)U T U C N Vl C 3 U ° v) t 0 .0 O Tcs > °
C () U O)U T (7) ...O ..-E > .- 0 0- > .. v) O .. O o N 70 > E a) C > a) (`6
w 5o ° v) n Y (no '� ° rn ° 0 3r a° ° (n '-
0 o m ° . S) Tr 2 o s a (L° '• 3 .3 ,9- m F, .>- 0 U rn O (� ° > 0 6 0
m
O 3 E o .� m w E o< cam) c w Y a0i .� n m m > _J n m N- a) . = O w ° °
° (6 E O w3 N >,> _CN O y > O o
.� > O CO 3 C -6 g C O o 0 0 0 2 j o 3 0 - >, A 0 N `°
W a) m O, m N C E S) > m `0 °a) - 2 S) 0_ E n w E U > C
.�.. > O O O � „,2
) T'V O C ° > V) .(n 75.
V O V) N O U v) S: U
• O aS O 7 U U
2 y a) '� N 0 0) 0)_2 N C v) .-.N y6 Q N N 1 C o LL `- E (n 6) 0 U r a)
.5 d (n ° a) .5 C D 3 r rn O u, -E a) V a) E S: =o v n O -6 > . °
`y 8 rn (n E -o o f .S o -o ° > 0 o .0 .3 ° o T C s E o Vi o E u
2 E d i m c w Ei 2 E a 9 o a) o f E o 0 3 C 2 a) o > O C E
o
ce N i a) IL 7 V a3 s U C 8p > (n a) c t C vo) r 0 > ° E C ° ` E (6 0 (n (n C
dj " u) � U 'p) 0 ` 0 '> - ° 0 m Co n 2 O - r > E 0c‘i 2 0 0 m w N O °
a) H o co o n ° `o a) o .'m O m ° p O E O 3 0 T S) ° n 'u
_ V > -6 a) -6
V l3 4.a) N 2 - n C U '13 E -a ,- > .0 a) > ,- N > > (a Q a) OV y0 ... > T a) S) a) 70 Z
V) 'C R i a N .� in k > S: a C 7 C -° U N .� .N N .�>. U o n N 3 aS U [
S 2 i a- N N C .0 C S: 0) 0 V) 0_ a) C 0 a) N V) > O > a) C °-S) 6)-6 O N - 0 S
0 a 0 f/) li 3 E ° o 'O d w < 0 m o n 2 0 .� D_.S r _1 o E li r -a ° > m 2 n C U S
o r O ` U N C .N C ° O t C O v) C
E r .5 s w v> >,-a > o C 3 ro 2 .° O '(77)
a- .0 a`6i E r m E 2 > F o _0 2i o w O n > O m n a) 2 O u)
• o ° 13
E .� T ° E o ° o E v `O o 2 > O E 2
(o , r O o 0) > >. (n N > a) O .E 6 (0 (n a) N -O > lL > cn O Q
8 (n o 0_t o .(n o .' o S: ',, v n m m E o . as 2 o 0
• 0) > (i00) O
-° cc0i .c.E `O a 2 t r m m `m o 0 T N 3 '° w E m > 0 C c N
6 a) 6)J U C ` (6 a) ' 'w a)
00 ) o (Ea '3 p > (A (n 'm -° c Yi > E E co o o .S n r Y >
0 C o .° u! a) 0 0 0 0 N N N +' >` C O > U Q C C N a) S) 7
• ° > U 12 u! p a u! 'N U o T E -6 E > Q V O > > _ > O V C O (/)
w r u o 2 ai O > o 2 v>i m'° v t a > 0 3 N .E
U (6 p > U > _° 0-t a) n U n o X N O > N `O a) E _a -6 U '°
O 3 O1 U -6 a) a `O m Q U in -6 Q U U aa)) S) 2 O E w E ° ° n o m Om -
v
3 ° o C u E >o O >
m
-6 u!LI
O O a) - m s N s 2 > > T —
> _ C o .= > E v in O1 (° 3 c
> >
M Q 0 N • E (6 U U T O ? C -6
N c o a) ' r o > a w n ° U a) - a)
N N 7 •3 t > u, E aa)i n 2 t a E 3 `6 3 ° o -° o 0
i cu
TD N (a O N °- " (0 C C -6 C n C 3 16 (0 N 2 0'
-0 X (n > Q > Q 0) N N > aS N O` 00 N O (6 °_ (N6
W N -a,
N C .C) > N o u! 6 u! > O a) ° LL (n °
S 0 > a) > � V) O c U -6 'Q(6 0 C 0- a) C 3
05 .°. E 0 sN N0 ` N> u j 6S > U
(p > -6 S!
s U) 3 an z2o > Qn .� < j
2 ii E 3 0 ° .- a cn
v)
3 Q
T .> °
7 U 5 c o f• 6) 2i a) C a) U E .0 a 0
Oa l4 m 'o U o s• 0> a (n
y V _ a) N . m> -6 C 4)
a) 'a -6 '> C O fs J > c C
„ C) w N C ° o_ > .° >-6 0 U Gl 6) !� -6 U 41 vl
G (n S a) V) v N ) (a o_ 2- p S) 3 a)
LL LL ^ v �C o - a E > 'X aoi O E _ _6 0
0
LL u_ . i 0 U) fn ° N D U (a O U (6 r Z
(� S C C E ° - o
�; CO a�i U w 13
m u m O o U
(n 0 > J N- N N C 4 N L(L) _8 (0 N O 6) 2

al
OS
o
N t0 N N 'Cr
o .> O y N 0 0) a) a) ° C a) O) V) C 0)
> w o v`) 0 0 c `s )• 3 .T 0 '0 3 m _Q n m v°i .2 t ° >
> as >
°S > •
S 2 C
sO•
CD
°oo ° o c0 n ai E t o• U o 0 o U 'm oE > m 7 a) ' o E (n ()No cc ` ° >o s 00 or E > `' ) 7, 2C i0 nr Ew.N ° O1 (D 00 0 '() C n E a) >oo. 0 0 a) p C > o o (n V) C a) .4 0 (Y
L ,a, O a > V 0O C > > 16 p a ° > V Q
O u E 0 E 0 g a)-0 0T CO o > O rn C > 0 y () U E
d O 0 u > ° C m a 2 L O o n D E a)
'Es Cr) Um T rn n ° 0s . N r O o o - o > o ° y - (`2 o uN 0 73 E rn a > C Co
> C > O Nim ` > OE j .2 > _
3V " t O r (py0
>'-O O ' -a V) •( 'O O >> O > aO > U> U .E 0>..� V) (n V0 (3 i° O > V C E .= > 0 O (n > > ° ° V g V �a) r 0 -° mU > O am . > - r E E E 2 > o _as m D . a` .,3 m o m a `m .7 o ai ._J E D mu
n >. .E.n a) Y 0 0 t _ O
'O t O a) O E C O U V U > p) U
o C
CD (p C y T yN. U > o �p N 7 ° 0 06 'V) ) E O
CD a) C N V1 E _a a O CO0) 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) N o N O)-O > _C Q a) C > Q O ._ O C Vi w -O >
.r.. >' 'V>-) _ •
°U S '6... '6 0 0 0 O V) S 7 N U N 01 7 - Y t
u
Y m E v) t E _ D 7. a) ° ac) CA'v)7. o 2 _a 0 o a n w s
l4
LL > '° in- ° '° ° 00 . _° 0 Y ao vi ° '° E m _• ° -° > rn a0i
(6 C > (o > O O o C 0 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C �_ U C
m ' o m •
V O 0 0 0 O > N C a) °' O.,.�.. •C O '6 •�.• s N (Cp C > O1 0 C > O .� N C U
u E 2 )- s a) O n o _ 3 rn o_ a) 3 o Q ° (6 S m C O1 as m s. E .m >
_° ° > V>) ° o E • Or .° N C S Y U . 0 T • Y N a) >
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U > .— a) C g) 3 C > U (6 N ._ C 3 C
in n o w n m c E o CO L0 E r m y `o o .S n 03 m n o w o n E 3 3 n o ° U
>, -b. ( o 2
0 CD
C C > W °` co O C O 'Q
a) ^U V) V) 6 r E C `0 E O C (6 t
E > 0 m > o .� o .� `m t n 0_ N o w 2
0 0 �-o U n a°)i a)▪ a) ' -0 E ° ° T m 7
0 _ _ 0 as
�o Es m > s `O mU 2 > > E > Q
' >•. 0 2 O E O ..' _ o) o
u � > = oon oa>i °oEo '� '� n � 2_ a) ) � � � .0
> 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 ,+._, a) W .� Y T. N N F V) > E a) co
V -a o Ea) 0 c —— � � � 0 � E 'Q a ° � -0 w N
o & 0 u as
O ooUo s0oog Oaro 'o > ,Nrn aEm m 7 T
C9 O C :? a) (n a) o N NU `Oar o ,U m I >
o a) > 0 0 0 0 0 . & 0 t n E m N r o .S '� o _a =
E a u w U n rn .r 0 > ° E ,, °; Y > > w o 3 cn
r ° 5 ° > (o o o .S m a) Y E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U Vv) V) > > V) - N > C C N 0
> O o N C C r > _° t E .3 > C o o_ O E C 3 C U V) t N S (`') N N
O m n aa)) m c E o 2 3 Q 7 La n 0) aa)) o in m m � W E cu 3 0 o N
s j
a -
m s o 2 m m.- 7Tu
> 0 3 n > a .° o ° n ag) o
E `o > T °• > > 0 C > > .� D rn - 3 r s
> m _ O ' > a (n o
M > o 0 0 as 0 aO1i as > n .`>)
3 3 .S
... > 6 ') . 0)7 o y > CO t C U a E O a) >i N
C > a) N a) o 0 O . N o t p) >` E
o o v T o r ° �° U 0 E °- > ° o a o 3 0
7 O > C > > C U r
K >` N > V O U C a) > C > E• C N '� N N
CO
W r > .> O o (6 E 0) O — (n C O) > a) _ M t II (6
-O O > N792
N co T,-. > ?) >.C -O C C a) U a) 3
6
co
N N o '� vl s N '(6 3 N O s N 0O vi n - 0 E ms" N c N
as > > E o E as o .m w
U m Eno m a r =o n > _a `m • _a ° z > > 2 2 0 o
O N
> N Y ` N >,
U _
L > 3 01 Cla
S 7_a 2II
O 0) n as
V o C > Y ° U a) TD
C > (6 > co r C
Oa Y �) S C > co
>, 2 n C > O a) O L
7 Y S 0 01 m N a a (�
S N N > C - _° U > >
w U •> N E Q a) i O
o > o U 3 > E O z
Yas
co > O1 O C N N 0 co
V
_ >
a) > V) > U m 2 D C r
m Q > a) te+
O O ° N M• > I I O
oo 00 .- a E 2 H

a
3o 0) � N. � CD
0 E 3 ' U tg)L S: v CI
`o m o > S m E rm .N▪ 3 S' of U > p o Tm S rn aE o ° a) - U
as o > 0 a>i -' E o o v > 3 F > ` 0 O rn
> O) U .N U V) S! > > a) o C (0 U C C
0 0 > as t O E 8 >'0 > a) -E o >, a) s v m 3 > S) n 0
0i a -o n v) o f_c il m 5 N o c o 3 a w •3 .E > o .N 2 Z a)• > 0i c
0 u
w > (1 u
m :w w v _rn 3 - ai >O a T rn > > °� °) E 2 0 0 o .° a) v) w 3
O a O1 m„ = s `m o > (n as .5 .� 2 E .5 o N rn.3 o a o o > `O
d (A o 6 'E w 3(1 t > G) > > 0_ N a m v2i 2 > 8 N rn A -p N
0 - u' n - u, w o o m a) o -p ci ct$> o u, ro clroo 2 > 3 m E 2 0
V)730 (Dp O)U _T U C N Vl 3 U O v) t 0 .0 O E Ta a) >
co
C 5 U O)U .- T O O .5.. 8 > .- 0 0- > O O .. O o a) -O > E a) C > n a)
w '5o a) Ginn Y 2 (n V) > rn > 0 3 -. o 0-2 a) a (I) .co
m
O E o .� m w E o< cam) m w Y 0 .� _am m > J A CO LL o ff
cn > _T
> N E ) cn 3 N T c
> _c N O y > O o
.� > O Cp 3 C -O s C o o O 0 U 2 j o '3 0 — T A 0 > `°
W > m O1 m Ni as t a) S) > `) °0 o 2 S)• 0_ E CI 0 or n w E 0i >
.�.. > O O O � „,2
) T'V O C > > V) .N N V O v) a) o U V) S: U
O a) O 7 U U
2 y '� a) 0 O) O)_2 N C v) '_'w y6 Q N N 1 C 7 LL N- E y0 N O) 2 U a) N
.5 d (n 5 .. E D 3 r rn 0 ° o a) (al a) E S: =o v n 0 -O > . as
`y U rn 'n E -o o f .S a) -o > > U o .E .3 > N T m _CI E o C o E u
2 E d &- m c w 2 2 E a 9 8 o a) E E `� E o 0 3 2 2 as o > O ° E
O
a. N i N LL 7 U m CO s U C o > (0 m c t C v0i y a) > > E C > ` E (6 N N N T.
dj 2 Q u) � cam) 'p) ° ` O '> t > 0 p) p i 2 O - r > E (V as 2 O O m w N O >
CD H o CO o n a `o as o .'m O m O 0 E O 3 0 T S) > S) 'u
V to N 2 - 7 C U 'E 13 -a ,- > .0 0 . a) > (- N > > () Q a) OV y0 ... > N T a) S) a) -6 Z
V) •C R i CD CD 0 al a N U •— N 0 .E > S: Q C 1,1
C U U c N .� .N N .�>. U o n N 3 a) U [
S Y i w N N C .0 C S: N u! Q a) C p a) u! > O N () C O-S) O)-O o in '— 0 2
0 a 0 f/) li 3 16 E m o 'O d w < cam) o o n 2 cam) .� a.S r _1 o E li r - m > m 2 7 C 0 S
r `o ` U 5 o .N C) > o s c o r
E r .. 1 w v> TO >gE o m 3 ro U ° O , .00
aui .0 a`6i E r m a>i > o S) 2i o w n > O m A m 2 0 (n
p S) -o > p u) S) o rn o cn n CD 3
2 • o S u E T as E •:o a) a o E v o o 2 > O E 2
(o n r O O rn > > ; > a) O .E 2 `° u as u o > )i > N o Q
u, o t o .N o 2 2 .S o 0 v n m m ,_ o . as 2 0 0
u > rn > u as E > Y S)
'a a co
U U 'm'E o Q N 2 t N g N (6 N 0 T N 3 2 N E N > Q 0.1 . (V
a) 01 J U C ` (6 a) ' 'w a)
p , o '3 p > (A (n 'm2 a ' cYi > E o .Snr Y >,
(p -p Og u! a) O N p N N N +' >` C OCV > U 45 _a L. C N a) S) 7
C > g U y6 u! N 2 a N .N U O >. E -O E > Q V O > > _ > O V C O 0.)
� N .N' Eaai °)' � uo � � aio > o8v> g Vim'`° vrQ � > o3 N .E c
U > a) u! O .? > > Q > N — O Y -p > T > Q U 'N
U (6 p > U a) -2 Q t a) j U 7 o X N o > N o - E 0 -O U U
0 3 O1 U -O a) a `O m Q U in -O Q U U aa)) S) 2 O E LL E 0 0 n o m O m -
a
v
Tu
it
C -o O >
mo u, E > '
-
-6 u! O O a) 00) -p S) N S) 2 >▪ > T —
> - C 2 :- > E V V) a) 3 —
N .. 2s U T -8
8 > >, u, E >,.> 3 a) No > E
W CD_ En o () �_ O °) t 2 O A > > 45
S V N N O Y)0) O- " a) . -O m A m 3 -O (0 2 > O-
_ > a isi CDC) W 2 -O u c .�-V) o � ~ N c) 8 o. `m oa V o 3
y 0 o - v o N .0_N O _ E vi s E'
(o ai 2 c > > o rn>• > vi o m E v (° o > o O >
n CD U r > a) .- U .>_ as O - (0 5 S n c 2 E
s > U 0 o -o -OS) w
•3 U) 3 a n z 2 o > Q n .� < o 2 u E 3 m 0 .- a (n
> N
>, w
(1) .0 C c O E di0
a
C .�+ .0 vv)i 'O a) .5 CIS
(o m -o 0 o _CI o a vi
i as p co
• S! C
co N G a+. -O U E U > .� N-6 O U
r c r V
G W (n S a) N r �p a) o_ o S) y >
co M N X to -O - y, a) E O O E o U o
LL LL co .. a) o_ E 'R >
_ z
LL LL .- i 0 U) S: U N )0 U 16 O > U (e r
S c c E > 2 _ o
�; CO a>�i U w m u m O o U
(n 0 > J N- m N PM 4 N LL c0 N O O) 2

es
O CO ( Z CO ti
-O N VN) V) -O C y Y C (n O) > T
o .> O y N 0 O) N > . ° C a) O) Vl - O)
> w o v`) 0 0 c `s 3 .T 0 '0 3 m _Q n m v°i .2 t ° To
> as >
• > O
°oo ° o 0 0 n (D- E t o• U c o a6 0 o a) U U °-
N U m t O O _0 a) , -O . a) ._ ._ Z
E > m >-° a) ' o
ES 2 C s(n
()No cc o ° o s 00 or E > `' ) D 2C i nr Ew.N ° O1 (D 00 U '() C n E a o>
o. 0 0 0 a) p C > O o (n V C a) .4 (Y
L EOa) > V a) O C > > 16 p a ° > V Q
O u u E 0 E 0 .0 0, 0T CO o > O rn C > 0 y a U E
d O 0 u > ° C m 2 L O o n D E a)
S ° Cr) ° m T rn na ° Os ._ (n r O o o - o > o °-2 omN 072E 0.) a > C Co m ,- (` m N> rC� ' ` > OE ° j .2 > _
3V - 0t O (pyO
>'-O O 3 -a V V ' O >> ° > aO > Ua) U .-2. 0T.� = V (n V0U i° O > V C OE '5 . > O O (n > > ° -° V g V �a) -° mU > O a m . > - r E E E 2 > ° _am m D . a .,3 m o U a `m Q ° ai ._J E D mu
n >. _
n a) Y 0 0 -C _ O
'O t O 0 o E C O U V U > p) U
o C
'( U m, y) a Q ' 0 ' ' g ai .� ,o E .(5
3 'o 0
CD (p C y T yN. U > �p N 7 ° 0 0 ° 'cp V) ) E o
CD a) C N V1 E _a a O COO) 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) ) OU N O)-0 a) _C 0- a) C > r- O .- O C Vi w -O >
.r.. >, (6 'V>-i • °U c00 s U,.T. U O O 0 O• V) -a 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u
Y m E w t E _ D 7. a) ° ac) CA'v)7. o 2 _a 0 o a n w s
l4
LL > -° in- ° '° ° 00 . -° 0 Y 00 vi ° '° E m _• ° -° > rn a0)
(6 C > (o > O O o C 0 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C •_ U C
m ' o m
V O 0 0 0 O a) N C a) °' O.,.4- C 0 so-O •!.• s 0 (Cp C > O) U C a) O .� V) C -6
u E u )- s m 0 n o _ 3 CI) a a) 3 o Q ° (6 S m C O1 as m s. E .m >
-° ° > V>) ° O° E • Or .° Nc co C S Y -O . (6 T • Y N a) a)
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U > .N a) C � 3 C > U (6 0 U C 3 C
m n o w n m c E o cn uo) E r m y `o o = n 03 m n o W o n E 3 3 n o ° U
>, -b. V o 2
0 CD
C C > W °` C O C O 'Q
a) ^7 V) V) (5 r E• C `0 E O C (6 t
E > 0 m > o .� o `m n 0_ ° N o w U
0 0 o �-o U n c as▪ a) ' -0 E ° ° _T m
0 _ _ 0 as
�o E _c o > s `O mU 2 > > E > Q
' >•. 0 2 O E O ..' _ o) o
u � > = oon oa>i °oEo '� '� n � 2_ a) u � � � .0
> 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 ,.... a) U .� Y T. N N E V) N E a) co
-0 -0 o Ea) 0 c -- 0 � � 0 � E 'Q a ° � 0 w N
o & 0 D as -a 2p vm o ° o 0 °° g ° a o 'o > ,N r n a E 0 >,
C9 O C :? a) (n a) o cn a) -0 `Oar o ,U m I >
o CO a) > > o 00 0 . & 0t n E m N r o .5 'oo _a =
r ° o ° > (p O o .S m `' Y E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U V>`l V)▪ > > V) - N > C C N 0
N O O° N C C r > U t E .3 a) C o Q O E C 3 C -6 V) t N S (`') N N
O m n ax) m c E o 2 3 Q -a La n rn ax) o in m m � W E 3 O o N
s j
o -
m s o c m m.� 7Tu
> 0 3 n > a .° o o ° .N g o
E `o > T °• > > 0 C > > .�to D rn m a r s
> m _ O ' > a C o (n o
M > o 0 0 as 0 aO1i as 4).)
n .`>)
3 3 .S
C > (a N a) o N O . N o t p) >` E
° v >,r o f �° U 0 0 a > ° o a o 3 0
-O O > C > > C U r
irs
N C � (I))>• C NV U > C E N ' II 6K >` > a) M ow O 6 E O O an C O) _ tCO
W
-O O > N792
N co T,-. > ?) >.C -O C C a) 0 a) 3
6
as
N N O '- vl s N N 3 N O s N vi n - N am" N c N
a > ° > E n o > Eas o .m w
U mE n m a r =o n > _a ` ' ° Z > 2 2 0 o
O N
> N Y ` N N >,
U _
L > 01 C
3 S 7 II13
O to n as
VO° C > Y ° 2a) TD
C > as () r C
0 as Oa Y �) _aC > as
>, 2 n C > O a) O L
S N N > C - U > >
w U > N E Q a) i O
> o U 3 > E o O Z
Yco
> 01 O C N N 0 co
V
_ >
a) > v) > U m 2 D C r
m Q ' > a) te+
O O ° N M• > I I O
co rnrn .- a E 2 H

N
0 a) co co CO CO 1.0
0 E 3 ' CU � ii � S: V rn a
.� 2 `O > �, m o > S ° E ym .N 3 2 of
> p o T m S rn cts
a E o ( ° - U
(6 2 0 N °- N N `-' E 0 0 -c 0 V > 3 a > ` U -O 01
> p 01 U .N U N S! > > N o C i6 -p C C
c4 " 0 0 > c t o E N > u > 6s 1.. t o >, 0 s V m 3 > U n n
ccoi O1 C S N 0 (D 7 N p Ti; C O .3 a N 3 '� >` O 'N 2 z O > U C
o o c N .E o > m w 0 m °-> E c -°p O c -0 > -a U a) s > U c o 7
w > 6s w
m :�°- w v _rn 3 - ai >p a T rn > > -°� °� E E 7) o 0 o .° w w 3
O .- O1 m m m _ m s `m o > (0 CI ..- - ° E .6 E o N rn.3 o a o o > `O
d ) (A s S o i '1 w c�i 2 > 63 > > N a v2i 2 > E 8 N rn A 'p N
U v, n - N w o aoi m `° ° > o N 0 o 2 > 3 m N 2 0
Vl 0 01 U _T U C N " vi C 3 U .2 ° U) S: a.O Ocs E Tts > >
N 2 rn-p '- T > O y 5 > .2 0 a > o 0 a) p > E > 6s m
w e '5 o 7 � > C -U) Y N N N > rn > 0 3 y o a° � n V) .m
o m _° ,E n m Tr o s Q (�° ' 3 .E >9- m g .>- o U rn 0 (� U > °� o s o a E
m
O 3 E o .� m w E o< c�i ta w Y a0i .� n co m > J A m - 6s . .- O Cl_ ° H °
W N _T
> E O N 3 N T C
> y N O y > O p
}T' ° 65 U E -p N C r 2 O c
.> > O Cp .3 C -p g C O o O o V 2 j o '3 0 - T A O N -6
.0 m 13 (6 a-°) E aoi aTi .N O t U U E n a ° or `m m m m c E
I- > C O1 6s N S: > n > () `a U '- .- a_ E n w E U > (6 a
y O 'c Vl T+� U > O U) .(n O O O V O v) (6 O O U) S: U
- ° ° N 2 O > 65 N N C4 a a O 7 U U
W ((I Fri '_ 65 0 m 01 s (6 C p (n ._.v) N Q N 2 (6 C j LL E (n 0�1 2 V N N
06 (n 5 .S rn 0 (n > (n E S: =o V n 0 -p o . o
O E 1) U rn E 3 `' o f .E a`) -o a) > c>i ,� 3 > N T 2 m s 2 0-o E v
O c is d •` m . ( w .� 2 2 E a ° 0 E o m E o $ 3 m > 6s o > '18 5
o
^� N i LL 7 V a s U C 8p > co N c t C . y > > E C > 2 E (6 N N N T.
y E " N F U 'p) 0 ` ° '> t (D a ta p N 2 O t rE > E as N U O ° m w N O >
� 0 CD H o rn o n ° `o hs o o r'm U m5 � p ° E � O 3 0 T- U)
_ . 73 V > 6 N O
L V c6 E NCD CD 0 co N U 01 7 E U 'E -8 > C l u) 65 > N 65 > c a 65 OV y0 ... N N T 2 S! a 76 Z
Vl '0 R i Cr N U •.- N N .5 > S: a C U C U U c o .0 .N .0 N r U o n N 3 65 U [
S Y i w N 16 C .0 C S: N U) a 65 C p 65 U) > O N (6 C a S! 01'6 p in '- p 2
0 a 0 f/) li 3 2 E ° o '(n d w < (.) m o n 2 . .� a.S r o f li r -a o > m 7 C U S
r `o ` Tio o .N C) > o o s c o (n c
E r .5 o w v> T o > o m r o U ° O . 'vo0i
N U N E y N N > 2 in S! U O N 0 s > O i6 A N O u)
p N 7 S! '6 C > O N S! O co N (n 7 N (D
0 N S u E .8 T > E -o c o o E V `O o 2 > p E 2
iz • �. O O 01 > >. Vl N > 65 O .E > N 65 N U > > > lL > N O Q
7 U (n o Q r FO .N O C C F o O S: V n N 0) N o . N 2 o O
w > m > w co E >, Y n
01 > 01 O
V _° '- U 'm'E O w Q N t N EE1 N (6 N N T N 3 ', N E N > Q .7).
071 g CO
N
(6 0)J U C ` (6 65 'w 65
p o 3 p > (n 'm 2 c Yi > E o .S n r Y >
(6 -p Og N 65 O N a>j p N N N +' T C O > U 46 Q C 0 (. 65 7
> > U Vl N a N .N U O T E -p E > Q V O > > _ > •O V C O (/)
_• c CO aai °'' a o � ai o > o v> m'`° V r Qo > 0 3 N .E rn
U > 65 N O .? > > Q > N - O Y -p > >"' ra > a U :N
U (6 p > U > a t 65 j U 7 O X N p j6 `O (6E S! -O U -°
O 3 O oU -p a a `o m Q U in -p Q U U aX) n 2 o E w E ° ° n o m O m •
v
> C O >
Tu
m o E >o
'6 V1 o O c O_ C -p S! N S! 2 a) > >` +.
> �_ - ° - > E V N CO 6s 3 c
0 7 o N E E 65 o N o T l.L O > C '6
c > �voi . r > > a w > 2 6s 0 >
-p U T `� -2 > >, (n E >,.> 3 6s No > E
(�.i N 3 r a w ( n.) n 2 t a E 3 ° 3 o d o 0
•G) = E p N °O r C_ o O ,m-p -O O 0 /c > v>j N
-0 X U) > Q > Q 01 N N > 65 N O` p v>j O 65 °_ ((66
w -p N C .� > yp o N (n c1 > O 65 O LL N O
S �O > 65 > � N O c U -0 'Q N O c O- 65 c 3
> U) °j5 U S: > i/i .>. E V > (6 p N s0 O E'
_Q > U a > N .- N .> N V`°i — N ( 7 S: O C > E
tz (6 > '6 S!
s CO 3 a n z2o > Q _a .� Q o2 ii E 3 a 0 a 0
(n
T ; E o - Y o_ >
C
j u S o o E m 6s la
CO C > .0 N U N .5 N
VOa CI _ > m -a8 N
Gl V -p '> C O J > 65 C
i o > -SI > c
I,- otj o 65 RS
r
O S 65 N : N 16 Q v `o s 3 >
LL LL ^ v X « o o a E > 'X aoi ° E E 73 °
LL LL � i C U) t O N N U i6 O > U (6 r Z
CD y 2 N i 'O L� U w co a _p m O o 8
(n 0 > J N- ((66 N CO 4 N LL _Q c0 N O 01 2

O N. N. CO 'Cr
cp 03
co
-O N VN) (I) -0 C y Y C Vl O) > T
o .> O y N O) N a) . ° C (6 O) V) C O)
> V) o (n N O C `t N .T U '0 3 co s s N N O) (o
> m >
> • O
O ° T y U 0 C O '° 0 0 s o 8 VNi N Vj N p
N U • t O O s N , -0 N ._ (6 ._ Z E U U °-
v o E > m >-° m a) 0 O o o E U u u w
C E `o ° r o s r E o > `' ) , 2 >
o 0 i0 0 n • O1 °� T E w 0 0 0 'V, C n E m o
O m C > o o C m .4 C u,
L E z N > V co C > > p 16 p a V) )n V) > V) co Y Q
O u u E 0 E 0 g a)-0 0 T C O o x Y °
O > ° m > O rn C > 0 y m U
O 0 u o C m 2 L O m 0 C N E
d s ._ N ,n r o 0 0 `—° o > 0 r 0 n S ° Cr) ° m T rn ai ° 0
-2 o m 0 72 E 0) a > C Y C ° o y m '-- n n
0 '- `0 ,t„ > O O E > o >.r_ coC y > O) OU j C > j (` - N
T.� V) )n V) U >'-0 O 3 S V) V) '� > O > O U U .f.. 30
E r .= > O) Y 0O V) N i° V) O > V) C `° O > > a > a) V) g V)
m (o m -° m U > O a m .g > -o r > E E E 2 > > ° ° > u �_
J E D m m D u . a` r m o io ai `m Q a>i ° .-
>. _
0 E Y 0 0 -C _ O
'O t O co O E C O U V U > p) U
o C
'T) U m, u c Q ' 0 0 ' g 2 .� ,o E r 3 'o 0
N (p C y T yN. U > co N 7 ° 0 06 'V) ) E o
O) (L$ C N V1 E _a a O COO) 3 U N O C
O > -O U N CI v OU N O)-O a) _C 0- M C a) Q' O ._ O C Vi w -0 >
.r.. >, (6 .N O• U c00 s U,.T. -6 O O 0 O V) s 7 N U N �) - Y t
u
Y m E (nt E •_ D 7. a) o ac) CA'v)7. o 2 n' o a n °9 s
l4
LL u, -° in- ° '° ° 0 `O0 . -° Y 00 vi ° '° E m -• ° -° u, rn a`))
(6 C > (o > O O o C 0 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C �_ U C
m ' o m
V O U) 0 0 O a) N C (6 °' 0.4--' •C o -0 .!.. s 0 (Co C > O)ff U C N O .� V) C -6
u E u )- s m O n o _ 3 CI) a a) 3 o Q ° (6 E > C rn > m 0 ' E .m >
-° ° > V>) ° O° E • Or .o N C S Y -0 . (6 T • N D a)
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U > .a) a) C g) 3 C > U (o N U C 3 C
m n o w n m c E o cn L0 E r m y `o o .S n 03 m n o w o n E co 3 n o ° U
>, -b. V) o 2
0 CD
C C > W °` C O C O 'Q
N ^7 V) V) 6 r E C `0 E O C (6 t
E > 0 N > N C • .� O N • (p t C a ° N OU N U'
0 0 to' �-o U n c m a) ' -0 E o ° _T m 7
0 _ _ 0 m
'A,' E s o > s `O m U m > > E > Q
' > . 0 2 O E O ..' _ o) o
u > = o o n o a>i o E o '� .� n 2_ a) ) .0
> 'V) N U (O T 0 -O 3 ,.... N U .� Y T. N N E V) > E () co
13 -0 o Ea) 0 c -- 0 � � 0 � E 'Q 0 ° � 0 w N
o & 0 D m
p o o -0 0 s 0 oo g ° a r o 'o > ,N r n a E m m 7o T
CD O C r a) (n a) O N C N -0 O d OU ,U - O) O t -° >
oCO `m > o 00 0 . & Ot n E m N r o .5 '460), o n` =
E a u V, U n rn .r V) > ° E ,, °; Y > > V, 3 cn
r ° o ° > (o o o .S m mY E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U V>`l V) > > V) - N > C C N 0
> O O° N C C r > U t E .3 a) C o Q O E C 3 C -6 V) t N S (`') N N
O m n aa)) m c E o 2 3 Q U U _a a) aa)) o in m m � W E 3 0 o N
s j
o -
m s o .- m m.- 7Tu
> 0 3 n (3.) 0 .° o o ° .N o
E `o > T °• > > 0 C > > —> 0 rn m a r s
M > o 0 0 m 0 aO1i m >CT CD .`>)
3 3 .S
C > (6 N 9 o N O . N o t p) >` E
° v > r o f �° 0 0 a > ° o a o 3 0
-0 O > C > > C U r
N C � (I))>• C V)V U > C E N ' II asK >` > co co t N .> O O (6 E O O Nn C O) _ CO
W
-0 O > N > N O T,-. > ?) >.C -0 C C N U N 3
6
N N O '- vl s N N 3 N O s N U)n - N am" N c N
> m > > E 0 2 (o o .m w
U m Eno m a r =o n > n0 `m ' n ° Z > > 2 2 0 o
O N
> N Y ` N N >,
U _
L > S 7 01 C
3 IIla
6 O) ( COn as
V O° C > Y ° 2NTD
Oa Y �) _a ...E. > co
>, 2 To0 a) O 2 O L
7 Y 0 co c
m N a-
' a C.)
S N N > C - U > >
w U •> N Q N i O
o > o U 3 > E O Z
Y a) 0cts
03 > 01 O C N N 0 co
V
_ >
m > V > ° m 2 D c t
m Q > co Ts
O O ° N M• > I I O
0o rnw .- a E 2 H

N
CO CO CO CO Li)
0 E 3 CU � ii � S: v c) c
' ° N S: O U m ''2 m m r . G) C • C
2 0 > m o o s m E r CO .N 3 S o t U > p o Tm E rn aE O ° a) — U
as o o ° -' E o 0 v a) 3 a > ` 0 p rn
a) O) U N U n S! > a) a) o C a) U C C
O O o a) t O E c > 0 > a) • t o >, a) s V rn 3 S) n °
' 'E °i a di o n N o 0 m S v°i o O a ( 3 .° >' o 'n 2 z a)• o °i C
u
0 coi m N .E O T N N N ur ( E c - - o c -a > a) N s a) 0 13 N 7
w o 0 u
m :w w -0
v _rn 3 — ai op a rn o o —°� °�-TD E o ai o .° C w w
O 5 O1 m m m _ •
m s `t) > u) a) .- • 0 E .7) o N rn.3 o a o o > `o
a N (A _c o 0i 'E w ci 2 t ° (A > a) N a m vN 2 a) E 8 N rn n 'O °
° u' - n — u, w o 0 a u as - o -p 0 cl o o u, 2 o 5 > 3 m N 2 ()
• Vi o O)U _T U C N " Vi C 3 U ' ° 0 v) 0 — O to a) a)
C () U O)U T O O f• c ° .- C a a) O O .. O a) 'O N E a) C C a) D a) N
w 5o o v) n ° o ° o rn o0 3r a° ° ° .m
o m ° S) osa `�° '• 3 • m .>_ o rnO `mN 2 a) oo a aE
m
O 3 m E o .� m w E o< cam) m w Y o .� n m m > J n m - 0 . .- O LL ° H °
(i) T
N ) C,I T C> N N E O a o
.� > O CO 3 C -p g C O o ° 0 U 2 j o '3 0 — T A 0 a) `°
.0 m -a m a-°) E aoi aTi .N O t U U E n a 0 or `m -° m U CO m c E
I— o as O1 as N S: a) S) > m `a) ° '' 0- E S) w E U o °
y O '� u! T+� U C a) O u! .N O O O V O u! a) O 0 u) S: 0
- ° ° N 0 0 > a) )n u! � Q Q OD 0 0
W y 'E a)Fw C m O)s (6 C p u) "'u! N X- Ui 2 �p C n LL E u) OC) 2 V N N
0.5 u, U 2 .E m 0 u a) u E S: =o V n 0 -p o . o
0 E a`) U co `n E 3 r o f .E a) -o m 0 U ( :C .3 o N _T m s o u
0 c is d ` m =o c w .n C E a o �` E o 0 3 m o E o o .°
O
N i ii;o LL 7 U N m s ° r C O > (n m c t C . y > O E 0E (6 N w u! C
y Q u) .E U 'p) C ` 0 '> C 0 0 0) C0 N 2 O C r O E N 7 00 0 m w N o 0
0 0 a) H oCa - rn O U) a `O a) o 0 E r'co U C D -° -p O E 0 3 ° T S) U) n 'u
_ V a) -O a) -O
V l3 4.N N 2 - n C U 'E 13 -0 ,- a) .0 a) a) ,- N• a) a) O Q a) OV o " a) 5 T O S) a) U Z
V) '0 (Si i CD CD 0 al a N U .E N N .E a) S: a C U C -° U C N .0 .N U)) N ) -O NO n N 3 U a) U U [
S Y i w N N C .C_ C S: m N 8 0_ a) C 0 a) N u) N O N a) C °-S) O)-O 0 in — 0 S
0 a 0 f/) li 3 16 E m o '° d w < 0 m o n 2 0 .E D_.E r o f li r -a m > m 2 m c U i
r• `o ` U 5 o .N C) o o s C o r C
•E r-.E a w vo T O o o m 3 r o 2 .° O c '7)7)
2 .0 a`6) E r m E ai > a) o S) o o w m O n o o m n m ,_ 0 (I)
p S) -o o p u) S) o co o (n D 0 3
• o S ° E > `° E •o as o E V o o arni > U E 2
(o n r O o O) ° >. )n N O O O .E 0 `° N a) w -o a) lL O N O Q
U) o 0_t o .N o .E o S: '� v n m m E o . 0 2 o 0
u o rn > u as E > Y S)
O) a) O) O _
-a -° 0 .5.E `o a m m m `as a) T N 3 '° `� E `—° o n m ( N
a) O)J U C ` (6 a) ' 'w a)
p ) o ,Ep '3 p > (n 'm 2 c cYi > E o .S n r Y >,
E o E t . a 9 ' o o a E m o, E o p m a)
0 C o .° u! a) O N p N N N +' >` C O > U 45 Q C C N a) S) 7
C U V) V) 'N U O T E U E a) fl_Ta V O > a) _ a) O V C O (/)
• N � N r = " 0 ( C ai O a) C 8 O N'_ V t a N > 0 3 'N E coo
c
U 02
a) u! o . a) a) S > N — O Y -0 a) (n T a) Q U :
U (6 p N U a) -,-,0
° °-t o n U o O Q N o > N `O — E 0 -O U _° Ri
0 3 O1 U -p a) a `O m Q U in -p Q U U a) S) 2 O E LL E ° ° n o m 05
v
TD
°� o C u E o O o
m -o
'6 C O O a) o_ 0.) -p S) N S) 2 N > >,
o - C ° t. o E V in O1 a) 3 c
0 0
O Q 0 N E (6 U U T (4 O > t C 'O
.�.. jn C a) -c IT)) r N a) Q. n a) N _ O C a)
-0 S: U T V) -p > T V) E >-...,—> 3 a) NO O E
nwi CD 3 r .) u ( aa)) m 2 t a E 3 6 3 ° o -° o 0
i 16 0 1v°i a ° `6 C ' -p . n m 3 -p (0 0 ai o
S X N O Q a) Q O) N N O a) N O VO) 0 0 °_ (N6
(J,J N U V C N P. O N 7 V O co a) ° LL n °
S 0 a) a) a) � V) O c U U 'Q N O C 0- a) C
a) u! of5 '6 S: N i/i r E V •a) N 0 N s0 `o N
_0 a) 0 0 a) m .- N .> N V`oi — N ( 7 S: ° C a) E
(p a) -O -8
s U) 3 a n z2o > Q _a .� < j
2 u E 3 m o .- a
• N
3 Y _ T
j toE c o E rn a) la
aas
co is m 'o U 0 s• 0 a (n
V a o m -a 2 4)
W � N C O J a) C
N i 06 E O N m _S) > m
3 00 a1 V w (n C ° a a) E N 6 O U CD r +-' U U u)
J O S m N v N N o a 2- `o s Y N
LL LL N. v X C a) - a E o 'X ao) ° E _° o
0
LL LL . i 0 U) -8 ° N N U 16 O > U (6 r Z
C
E . V 42 w a) `m s c 2 E a -° U u, O o
to'
y R dN 2 al o i 'O L_ U w m 13
Cti a) a _0 m O cis -a 0
(n 0 > J N- m (Ni PM 4 N lL _8 (0 N O O) N

CO Z a)
co
-O N VN) (I) 'O C y Y C V) O) > T
o .> O y N O) N > . ° C a) O) V) - .co
> V) o v) N O C `t 3 .T U '0 3 co _Q s N N O) To
s.
> as >
> O
O • ° T y U 0 C O '° 0 0 s o 8 VNi N Vj N p
N U • t O O s a) , U a) ._ (6 ._ Z a) U U °-
N o E > m >7 m a) o 0 i) o E U N ' ' ()
C E o ° r o s r E o > `' ci 2
V)
2 C C
s >
. a) p• C > oo V• N C a) .4 (Y
L EOa) > V a) O C > > U p a ° > V) Q
O u E E o g rn ° oT CO o > O rn C > o y a) U E
d O u > ° m L Io on D E a)
=° Cr) Um T rn n ° Os . 2. O o o - o > o ° y - (`t o mN 072E a, a > C Co
> > rC ° N� ` > OE j .2 > _
3V " Ot O co
>'-O O 3 -a V V 'O O >> >O > aO > (0,,,)a) U .E 0>,.� V V N U i° O > V C E .= > O) yO (p >S > ° -° V g V �a) r m -° mU > O am .g > - r E E E 2 > ° _as m D . a r m o U ai `m .7( ° ai .-E D mu
V >. 'E.n Y a) 0 0 t _ O
'O t O a) O E C O U V U > p) U
o C
'T) U -a V c Q ' o o ' g ai .� ,o E r 3 'o 0
CD (p C y T yN. U > �p N 7 ° 0 0 ° 'V) ) E o
CD a) C N V1 E _a a O COO) 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) CI N OU N O)-O a) _C Q a) C > Q' O .— O C Vi w -O >
.r.. >, (6 'V>—i •
°U c00 s U,''U O O O O V) s 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u25
Y m E• w t E _ D 7. a) ° ac) CA o 2 _a o a n w s
l4
LL > '° in- ° '° ° o0 . _° Y ao vi ° '° E m _• ° -° > rn a°)
(6 C > N > O O O C N 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C �_ U C
m ' o m
V O 0 0 0 O a) N C a) °' 0.4--' •C o -° .a. !.. s 0 (Cp C > O) U C a) 2 O .2 V) C U
u E (n (7) -(S ., ?a) n o _ 3 rn a a) 3 o Q ° (6 S m C p) as m s. E .m >
_° ° > V>) ° ° • Or .° N C S Y U . (6 T • N a)
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U > .- a) C - 3 C > U (6 N U C 3 C
in n o w n m c E o cn L0 E r m y `o o .S co 03 m n o w o n E 3 3 n o ° U
>, -b. V) o E
'Q0 W 2
C3 co
CD
C Y` O
C C > E E 6a ^U V) V) f6 C � r `C °
Y t
•
CI N co in -2 ON iE > N > N • . O a, (p " ° O -° m >`(po ` N o ... 6 U _a Na) a) 7 -° oE ` U Qm U >� _c o > s O 22E o° � no ° Em � '� o E o � � .0 rn� 2a) )u > > = oo aio . o 'a n V N _ a co
�oV CV U (O >, 0 -O 3 ,... 0U � Y T._ 'NN E ° � ° w N-0 E c —— 'a. -,2 & g D a aQ m ,-
a) >-,E >O moU s000 (5 ° aroo > ,Nrn O mU O) O t 7 =C9 v O r a) a ON NU O E m U ,r 5 ' o° ° o . & 0t an _a
Eo a) > o n rnr ° E ,, a; > V 03 E nr ° o a > VU . > o . m a)O C -aY (p `° r ° O O > >'NV V
_ r -a ` oo_ > V - N > CC N(') O
E C 3 C U V) t co S> O O N C C > ° t E .3 (3., C O
cl N N
O m n ax) m c E o 2 3 Q 7 La co rn aa)) o co m m � W co E 3 0 o N
s j
o -
m s o 2 m m.� 7Tu
> 0 3 n > a .° '2 o ° .N g o
E `o > T °• > > 0 C > > .to D rn -a) To 3 r s
^ > m _ O ' > a C o N o
M > o o ° as o aO1i as > 3 3 .S
C > (a N a) o N O . N o t p) >` E
° v > r o t �° U ° o a > ° -o -a o 3 0
7 O > C > > C U r
N C � (I))> V)V U > C E• C N ' II 6K >` > a) M t>N .> O O 6 E O) O a(p C O) _ CO
W
-O O > N792
N O T,-. > ?) . -O C C a) 0 a) 3
6
N N O '� vl s N N 3 N O s N • U)n — N am N co
c N
a > ° > E ° o > Eas o .m w
U mE n m a r =o n > _a ` ' n Z > 2 2 0 o
C
O N
> N Y ` N N >,
U _
L > S 7 01 C
3co
II13
O O) ( COn as
VO° C > Y ° U a) TD
C > as co ..0C
Oa Y �) _a ...E. > as
>, 2 N C > O a) O L
Y n o o) in °- II C.)
S N N > C - _° U > >
w U •> N E Q a) i O
> o U 3 > E O Z
Y co > 01 O C N N 0 co
V
_ >
0 as
> V) > ° m 2 D c t
CO Q > a) te+
O O ° N M• > I I O
co rnrn .- a E 2 H

a
3o 0) LI) � CO 1` ID
0 E 3 CU � (i 2OS: v rn
'' 2 `O > �' m o oS m E rm .N 3 2 of
a) 2 o O a —' E o O v a) 3 a > ` o _O or,
a) a) co U .N U w S) > a) N o C (a -CS C C
O 0 O a) _2 ° E m > u > a) t -o >, a) s v m 3 > s n 0
1 .— U 01 S s N 2 7 N O C C o . _ N 3 .O >, O .() 2 Z O a) U C
u
0 cc) m v •E o T(a v) 0 ,n °-> E c - -°p ° c -0 > -o O a) t 0 o ac c
w O a) u
&- m :E 8 w vi _0 3 — ai_00 a 2 T rn O O m — O E E o 5 o .° w w 3
O 0 O1 m m 3 = m s `m o > (n a) .r2 .� 2 E .c o N en.3 o a o o > `O
d N (A s S o a 'E w ci E (2 (o > a) 6 Nam v2i 2 a) E 7 N rn A _O N 2
u - u' n — u, w o a0i s a) o -p c)i O o u, 03 o > 3 m E 2 m
• Vi o O). _T_O C N " VI C 3 • O a o ,U Tcs a) a)
C 2 U O)_O .- T O O y � a) .- 0 a a) aS � .. o a) _6 a) E •O C O 0 a)
w '5 o2 a) c v, n o 2 V, O En O o 3 y o 0-° a) n E O .m
o m ° S) osa `�° '• 3 n.9 .>_ o rnN (� O Oo so aE
cis m
O m E o .� 2 w E o< cam) o w Y ao) .� n m m > _J A m .— a) . o (L ° I` °
a N _T
a) N E O u! 3 N T
> _cN O y a) O o
° 0 3 E -O g c `O o O o 0 2 g 0 3ci
0 — T A O U m
W a) m O1 m Li as t 2 S) > a `a) ° ' o 2 S) o_ E or n u) E Oi O
.�.. a) O O O � V, T'() O C a) > V, .N N V O u, a) O o u, S: o
ir, O aS O 7 o o
2 y '� a) 0 01 O)s N C p N ._'w ya c Q a) N 3 C o LL N— E y0 v) 8)O) 2 U a) N
ao d N O m .S t D 3 r rn 0 (, o O N o E S: =o v n 0 -O a) . a)
` U rn 0 E -o o f .S a) -o a) a) U o .E .3 a) N >, m s E o o E u
2 E At) i m c w � 2 E a 9 8 o a) o f E o 0 3 2 2 a) o O O ° E
O
a. CI) i LL 7 V s U o p > (n N t C u°i y > (D E C O ` E N N N N .
.. ' n U 'p) 0 ` ° '> t o a) p) p ,. 2 O t r EO E N -° O O m oi w N ° O
CD H o rn o n ° `o a) o r'm O m p O ° E o 3 ° T- O - 'u
_ ci) V a) _O a) _O
V c CD CD 0 al N 2 - 7 C U 'E (- a) .0 a) a) ,- N a) a) O Q a) OV o " a) N T O S) a) U Z
y 'C R i a a) U •— N O 'E a) S: Q C 7 C U U c N .c .N N r U o n N 3 as U C [
S 2 i w N t) C .C_ C IS m a) 2 a a) C p a) N (n ° O > a) C O-S) O)_O p in — 0 2
0 a 0 f/) (i 3 16 E o o 'O d w Q cam) m o n 2 cam) .� a.S r _1 o E (i r -a ° > m 2 7 C O S
O —_
r `o ` -O 5 o .N C) O o s c o (n c
E r .5 n w Ta a) o c 3 ro ° O . .00i
N .-U N E y N N > (• n S! U o N 0 n a) O N A a) O u)
p N 7 S! _6 C a) p (O S! O O)N (n 7 a) (.
c o S — E .� a) E _o C Tcs E 2 g o E v o o arni > c)(„ E
(O n r O O O) a) >. (n N E a) O .E a) )n a) N U a) > LL O () , Q
u, o o__c o .v) o .5 o (a v n a) m 2 o . a) 2 o 0
u O rn > u a) E > Y S)
• O) a) O) O _
'a _° U 'm'E O Q N 2 t N g N (6 N N T N 3 '2 N E a (D a) C1 o N
a) O)J ° ` (a a) ' 'w a)
p o (Ea '3 p > (A v) m -° Yi > E as O .E n r C m Y >
E O E t c .° a s '._ a) O o_ E a) en E 0 pct, a)
(a -p O � u! a) O O N co p N N >` 61 V O > _6 n C C N a) S) 7
a) O U u! a) a N .N U O T E -O E a) fl_ V O > a) - a) O V C O (/)
o� �v .N' � aai '°)' � `'/ 0 � a) ai o a, '.'2 8 g Vim'(° v r a 1 T � 3 .N .E rn
O O a) N O . a) a) C S > N — O Y -p a) >, a) Q U :N
U (6 p N U a) _° .' O-t O 7 p 7 O Q N o > (a `O a) E S) _O U _°
0 3 O1 p -O a) a `O m Q pin -O Q o o a) S) 2 O E w E ° ° n o m O m —
v
TD
O o E O C -0 0 0
m
_6 u! 0 0 a) O- C1 -p S) N S) 2 p > T —
O - c ° t. a) E v in co (a 3 c
O
M 7 O N C E a) ` u! N T O a) C -6
N O (D • v) O a) a w O a, a) o a)
N .. -p t C O T )i N U a) >` V, E >,.> 3 a) NO a) E
y '3 r O N F4 o n 2 t a E 3 m 3 oo O o 0
a) _ n o a) �_ o °) t 2 O A O O
S V N N o tn. °- O a) c _O E A N 3 _O (A a) a) O-
_ ° a
a) Tcs O y ° —• u o
E o i 'a m _ E v _a c2- E v ° oOO O a)ai V > > c rn T a) v Ti)
n N 2 a) a .� a . a) ° — (n . _c Q C 2 E
_c zO > I
V a O ( -o -O S
i mo .- a w
•3 U) an 2 ( . < o2 E 3
ai
O 0
y (� C 0 (n m O Q
a
(6 l3 (0 -6 0 S) 0> Q vi
y V _ a) . m> -0C O LaJ a)
Coco co a) ate+ _6 U E ° a) .� N_6 V, U
r
G W (n S a) N :� 1 a) 0_ C S) y a)
Yy in N X l4 -p - y, a) E O O E U O
LL L- CO -. a) o_ E O 'x a)
Z
LL U- i 0 CO S: O N D c) (6 O > U a) r
t t w `• a) c E a ° u! °0- 0 a)
ate+ y N _O L U w m u -p CO O cis -a o a
(n 0 > J N- N (NI M V cn lL _Q c0 r O co 2

al
O CO ( Z tO ti
co
w 2 Vj 6
-O N vN) (I) 'O C y Y C V) O) > T
o .> O y N O) a) > . ° C a) O) Vl - O)
> v) o (n N O C `t a) .T U '0 3 co o s N N O) (6
• > a) >
> O
o ° T y U o 0 0 '° 0 0 s o b vNi N Vj N p
N U t O 0 s a) N U a) ._ (6 ._ Z a) U U °-
N o E > m >-° m o 0 0 0 o E U N ' v ()
C E `o ° r o s r E o > `' ) D 2 >
o 0 i° 0 n .N ° O1 °� E w u 0 0 '() C n E a) o
O a) C > O o C a) .4 C ()
L E z a) > V a) C > > p U p a V) V) N > V) Y Q
O u u E 0 E o g taco o T C O o x Y °
O > ° a) > O rn C > 0 y a) U
O 0 u o C m 2 L O a) D E a) E
d s .S N r O o o `-° o > o r o n S =° Cr) U m T rn ai -° O
o o m 072 E rn a > C Y C ° o y - n n
v�j " `O ,t„ > O O E > o >.r_ (Ca y > O) °U j C > j (` _ N
T.� V) V) N U >'-O O ' 3 S v) v) '� > O > O U U .�.. O
E r .= > O) y. cO (p i° N O > V) C O O > > a > a) 2 (2 2
a) a) m -° m U > O a m .g > -o r > E E E o > > -° -° > u, �_
J E D m m a u . a` r m o is ai `m Q °n a>i ° .—
n >. _
n co Y 0 0 t _ O
'O t O a) O E C O U V U > p) U
o C
'T) U -0 u c Q ' 0 0 ' g 2 .� ,o E r 3 'o 0
CD (a C y T yN U > is N 7 ° 0 'a .° .N a E O
CD a) C N (n E Q a 0 O) 3 U a) O C
O > -O U a) CI N OU N O)-° a) _C Q a) C > Q' O ._ O o vi w -O >
.r.. >, (6 'v>-i •
°U c00 s U,''U O O O O v) s 7 N U N 01 - Y t
u25
Y m E (nt E _ D 7. a) ° ac) CA'v) o L" _a o a n w s
l4
lL > -° in- ° -° O 0 (cc)). -° Y 00 vi ° -° E m -• ° -° > rn a°)
(6 C > (o > O o C N 2O > N Or '5 ° .0 4,n > j C �_ U C
m ' o mas
U N C U Q.N y0 o a) T'6 > a) > Y u! ° U co > > _a E _a
V O 0 0 0 O > N C a) °' O.,.�.. •C O '6 •�.• s N (Ca C > O)ff U C > o) O .� N C U
u E v) )- s a) O n o _ 3 rn a a) 3 o Q ° (6 S m C O1 a) m s. E .m >
_° ° > V>) ° O° E • Or .° N C S Y U . a) T • N a)
C U t C U C C (6 E (6 > U a) .a) a) C — 3 C > U (a N ._ C 3 C
m n o o n m c E o cn i0 E r m y `o o .S n U3 m n o w o n E co 3 n o ° U
>, -b. (n o 2
0 CD
C C > CO °` a) O C O 'Q
0 0 to' �-o U n a°)i a) a) ' -° E ° ° T m -°
0 _ _ 0 a)
�oE _c o > s `O mU 2 > > E > Q
° • m o E o _ rn o
u � > = oon oa>i °oEo '� '� n � 2_ a) u � � � .0
> 'v) N U (O T 0 -O 3 .+�-, a) U .� Y T. N N E u! > E a) co
V �o Ea) 0 c -- 'a. -2 � 0 � .E .2 a ° � -° w N
o & o D a)
p vm) o -° o s 0 oo g O a r o 'o > ,N r n a o m m '� T
CD O C r a) (n a) O N o N U O d O° ,U .- O) O t -° >
o a) > > o ° o o . & 0t n E m nr o .5 '460), o _a =
E a u v, U n rn .r V) > ° E ,, °; o Y > > v, 3 cn
r ° o ° > (o o o .S m a) Y E
O C S Y ° `° 7 Or 'N U V>`) v) > > V) - N C C N O
> O OU N C C r > -° t E .3 > C o a O E o 3 C -O vl co s M -§ N
O m n aa)) m c E o 2 3 Q -a La co rn aa)) o in m m � W co E 3 0 o N
s j
0 6
m s (nm.�
> 0 3 n a) 0 .° 'a. o ° fn.
E `o > > S• > > o C > > = D rn —a) To 3 -C
> m _ O ' > a o (n o
.-
0, .> o o ° a) 0 aO1i a) 2 > (n 0 3 3 .S
> C > U w T-O > > > O >
... > C000 ') . O)-O a) y > CO t C ` a E O a) a E
C > a) N a) o N O . > o t p) >` E
° v > r o t �° U ° o a > ° -o -a o 3 0
7 O > C a) > C U r
N C � (I))> v)V U > C E• C N ' II asK >` > a) M t r N .> O O as E O) O Nn C O) a CO
s
-O O > N792
N O T,-. > ?) >.C -O C C a) 0 a) 3
6
N N o '� u! s N .F 3 N O _o N 0O vi n — w ' '� ate) o a)a)
T :? s a->i E o 0 '•°-- ° > To
0 T.� 2 c v`6i E
> as > > EO E a) o .m w
U m E n° m a r =o n > _a `m ' n ° z > > 2 2 0 o
O v)
> N O` N N >.
U w
L > 01 C
S 7 II
O O) (n co
V CU O° C > Y ° U N TD
C > C a) > a) r C
>, 2 o a) O 2O L
7 Y S O m N O- II C.)
S N N > C T7).co c
_° U > >
w U •> Q a) i O
o > o U 3 > E O z
Y co > 01 O C ((n N 0 co
V
_ >
a) > v) > g(b)
as
m o t
m Q • a) te+
O O ° N M• > I I O
oo rn 0 .— a E 2 H

Appendix C — Site Protection Instrument

Unique Places
May 11, 2018 To Save
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Ms. Conder,
This letter confirms that Resource Environmental Solutions has agreed to engage Unique Places to Save
("UP2S"), a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization located in the State of North Carolina, as the conservation
easement grantee and long-term steward for the Green Mesa Stream Mitigation Project ("Site") located near
Boonville, Yadkin County, North Carolina.As the conservation easement grantee and long-term steward, UP2S
has agreed to and shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in
the conservation easement are enforced and maintained. Specific responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of Site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to Site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly communicated to
the landowner.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), LLC shall act as Bank Sponsor of the Site. UP2S shall receive a
stewardship endowment in the amount of$31,528.57 to ensure annual Site inspections occur and that the terms
of the conservation easement are legally defended into perpetuity.
As the bond obligee for the construction and monitoring phase of the Green Mesa Stream Mitigation Project,
we agree to abide by the terms of the bond agreement(s) in the event that Resource Environmental Solutions
fails to perform or no longer exists.
V
A,
David Harper, Executive Director Representative ignature Resource
Unique Places To Save Environmental S''olutions
5/11//2018 Printed Name
Date 71
I ( vt
g
PO Box 1183 . Chapel Hill, NC 27514 585-472-9498 infouniqueplacestosave.orq

Unique Places to Save Annual Monitoring and Legal Defe e Endowment
Green Mesa Mitigaton Easement-CONFIDENTIAL
Units Hours Cost/Unit Frequency Annual Cost
Annual Monitoring
Staff time to monitor mitigation easement,including file
review,travel time,on site time,post visit report production 20 acres 4 $ 60.00 Annual $ 240.00
Staff time needed to address minor violations or issues N/A 10 $ 600.00 Once every 10 yrs. $ 60.00
Mileage 100 N/A $ 0.54 Annual $ 53.50
Meal Costs 1 N/A $ 20.00 Annual $ 20.00
Insurance 1 N/A $ 100.00 N/A $ 100.00
Total Annual Funding Amount $ 473.50
Capitalization Rate 3.50%
Monitoring En
Accepting and Defending the Easement in Perpetuity
Staff time for major violations N/A 50 60 N/A $ 3,000.00
Legal Counsel N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 10,000.00
Other Incidentals N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 5,000.00
Monitoring Endowment $ 18,000.00
Total Monitoring and Legal Defense Endowment $31,528.57

Unique Places
rot To Save
Unique Places To Save
Property Monitoring Report 2017
I. PROPERTY INFORMATION
• NAME OF PROPERTY:
• PROPERTY ACREAGE:
• DATE EASEMENT GRANTED:
• DATE OF ANY EASEMENT AMENDMENT(S):
• OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFORMATION
Owner Manager/Representative
Name(s)
Address
City,State,Zip
Phone
Email
• GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION
• PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (acreage, general biophysical characteristics, land/resource use):
• DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL CONCERN, FEATURES OR RESTRICTIONS(building envelopes,areas of intensive
management, riparian areas,access points,historic, etc.)
II. MONITORING INFORMATION
• DATE(S)OF INSPECTION:
• GENERAL WEATHER CONDITIONS(temp,cloud cover, precip):
• IF AVAILABLE,APPROXIMATE PRECIPITATION TOTAL FOR PREVIOUS YEAR:
• LIST ALL PERSONS ATTENDING INSPECTION:
• TIME SPENT ON INSPECTION: hours
• WAS THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
Unique Places
fr▪ it To Save

• DID THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANY MONITOR? Y N
• WAS THE EASEMENT REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
• WAS THE PROPERTY TRANSFERRED SINCE THE LAST REPORT? Y N
o IF YES: DEED FROM: DEED TO:
• IS THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY FOR SALE? Y N
III. MONITOR OBSERVATIONS
• NATURAL AND/OR AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITIES OBSERVED.Note any rare species.
• DESCRIBE CURRENT MANAGEMENT AND LAND USE WITHIN THE EASEMENT:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MANAGEMENT CHANGES SINCE LAST INSPECTION.Describe the activity or alteration. Note
location and extent. Document with maps,photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ AGRICULTURAL/OPERATIONAL CHANGES:
♦ LAND USE CHANGES:
♦ ECOSYSTEM/SPECIES PRESERVATION:
♦ SCIENTIFIC(research,surveys,etc.):
♦ RECREATIONAL OR EDUCATIONAL:
♦ WILDLIFE OR HABITAT MANAGEMENT/RESTORATION:
♦ EXOTICS OR DISEASE CONTROL:
♦ OTHER:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MAN-INDUCED ALTERATIONS SINCE LAST INSPECTION.Describe the activity or alteration.
Note location and extent. Document with maps,photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS,STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS:
♦ EROSION OR OTHER SOIL DISTURBANCE:
♦ OHV/ORV USE:
♦ FERAL ANIMALS AND/OR EXOTIC PLANTS:
♦ TRESPASSING AND/OR BOUNDARY ENCROACHMENT:
♦ TRASH DUMPING AND/OR VANDALISM:
Unique Places
To Save

• CONTINUAL OVERUSE:
• DISEASE (plant or animal):
• POLLUTION:
• DEFERRED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE:
• OTHER:
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES PERMITTED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT.Such as
construction of buildings,facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Include all reserved rights
exercised since last inspection. Note location and extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps,photos,
and/or illustrations as necessary.
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT.
Such as construction of buildings,facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Note location and
extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps,photos, and/or illustrations as necessary.
• NOTE ANY OBSERVED CHANGES IN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERSHIP OR CONDITION. NOTE ANY CONTACT WITH
NEIGHBORING LANDOWNERS.
• LANDOWNER/REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS.Include any landowner/representative comments specifically related to
the terms of the conservation easement and changes in land use or management.
IV. SUMMARY, STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• SUMMARY.Provide a brief narrative. Information from previous reports must be incorporated if available. Include
impressions of long-term trends and conditions of the site.
• STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
o NO VIOLATION(S)OF EASEMENT TERMS OBSERVED
o UNSURE DUE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR EVALUATION
o SOME EVIDENCE OR ACTIVITIES WERE OBSERVED WHICH MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF THE EASEMENT
• SUGGEST ANY ACTIONS THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN AS A RESULT OF THIS SITE MONITORING VISIT:
• INFORMATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR 2013 MONITORING VISIT:
V. MONITOR CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME:
TITLE:
ri°lc Unique Places
— To.Save

ADDRESS:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
SIGNATURE OF MONITOR: DATE:
*This report is a record of one person's observations during one visit.It is not intended to be a statement of landowner compliance of the conservation
easement.
VI. DESCRIPTION OF ENCLOSURES AND ATTACHMENTS
Indicate the number of the following items accompanying this report:
Aerial photos
Ground photos
Maps and Illustrations
Additional documentation
Other
If attachments are separated from this report, note their location:
lit Unique Places
Il To.Save

VIII. PHOTODOCUMENTATION LIST
Fill in the table below for all photos taken during the monitoring site visit.Also attach a map showing the location where the
photo(s) were taken.
UTM Northing UTM Easting
Photo# Photopoint Description (meters) (meters)
7111"la Unique Places
I To.Save

Unique Places
To Save
Unique Places To Save
Stewardship Monitoring Procedures and Guidelines
Unique Places To Save (UP2Save) is dedicated to upholding and defending the
conservation values of the easements it holds. An important aspect of achieving this is to
conduct our stewardship monitoring practices in a professional, accurate, and efficient
manner. The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure that staff will have the
guidance and expertise to properly monitor UP2Save's conservation easements.
UP2Save's stewardship monitoring procedures and guidelines are separated into three
stages: (1)pre-monitoring due diligence; (2)monitoring of the easement property; and(3)
post-monitoring due diligence. Each stage in the monitoring process is crucial in
employing sound monitoring practices and creating accurate and reliable documentation.
Pre-monitoring Due Diligence:
Pre-monitoring due diligence includes components that prepare the monitor for the
impending field work and documentation of their stewardship activities. The following
procedures shall be followed prior to all conservation easement monitoring visits:
1. Contact the landowner to schedule a monitoring visit at least one to two weeks
prior to the scheduled visit either by phone, email, or letter(make an effort to
group monitoring visits to multiple easements in the same general area in one
trip).
2. Make an effort to invite the landowner to be involved in the monitoring process.
Usually having the landowner available for questions or discussion of issues
before and after monitoring is fine. It is not necessary that the landowner
accompany the monitor around the property unless the landowner prefers to do
so.
3. If unknown, acquire any information needed to access the property (e.g. lock
combinations, gate locations,road/trail locations, contact information for land
managers and neighboring landowners).
4. A few days prior to the monitoring visit,make an effort to contact the landowner
to confirm the monitoring date.
5. Prior to the monitoring date, review the conservation easement deed, baseline
documentation report,most recent monitoring report, and any other pertinent
information (e.g. landowner correspondence, older monitoring reports).
6. Create a monitoring map of the property using aerial imagery or a topo map as
the base layer. Ensure that the property boundary is clearly depicted on the map
as well as any building envelopes or other important boundaries or landscape
features (e.g. stream buffers, forest management plots,property points of access).
7. Enter the property boundary and BDR photopoint locations (if available) into a
GPS unit for field reference.

8. Inform at least two staff members of your schedule and destination(s). Have an
emergency contact phone number available at the office.
9. Monitoring material that is needed on the monitoring visit includes:
a. Stewardship Binder
b. Monitoring map
c. GPS unit(with extra batteries)
d. Compass
e. Camera(with extra batteries)
f. Notepad
10. Prepare for your field work. Bring necessary field equipment to conduct a safe
and effective monitoring visit. Field equipment should include:
Required Optional
a. Sunscreen a. Tent
b. Extra water b. Sleeping bag
c. Extra clothing c. Firearm(s)
d. Extra food d. Stove
e. Extra cash e. Laptop computer
f. Topo map of greater area f. Bear spray
g. First Aid/Survival Kit
h. Blanket(s)
i. Shovel
j. Spare tire(s)
k. Cell phone
1. Flares
m. Bolt cutters
n. Crowbar
Approximate pre-monitoring due diligence completion time: 3 hours
Monitoring of the Easement Property:
The field portion of the monitoring effort should be interpreted as (1) an opportunity to
maintain and improve relations with landowners and/or landowner representatives; (2) a
small-scale duplication effort of the baseline documentation report; (3) an opportunity to
enhance, alter, or correct any deficiencies or errors in past monitoring efforts; and (4) a
check on the activities within and conditions of the property under easement.
The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure the efficiency, accuracy, and
safety of a monitoring visit:
1. The monitor should have a clear strategy of how the property will be monitored
prior to the site visit.

2. Meet with the landowner if possible prior to engaging in field work. Ask about
land management activities (past, present or future), activities on adjacent lands,
and any other issues related to the terms of the conservation easement.
3. Invite the landowner to accompany the monitor in the field. This is not necessary,
but it is polite to ask.
4. Enact the monitoring strategy laid out prior to the visit using all tools available
(e.g. GPS, compass,maps,photos).
5. Use GPS to track the monitoring route and take coordinates of photopoint
locations. Use the compass to take azimuth readings at the photopoint locations
(direction photo was taken). All photopoint coordinates must be taken in UTM
coordinates, Zone 13. All azimuth reading must be taken using the 3-digit method
(0 to 360°)to decrease ambiguity as opposed to using quadrants.For example,recording
a bearing of 192°is much clearer than 12°W of S,or S12°W.
6. Walk or drive as much of the property as possible making an effort to visit all access
points,boundary lines,and property corners. Pay special attention to building envelope
areas and other areas that may have more restrictive covenants(e.g. stream corridors,no-
timbering zones,high quality habitat areas).
7. Duplicate the photopoint locations that are depicted in the BDR. If new photopoint
locations are required; develop the new photopoint locations based upon current
landscape conditions and activities. Document these new locations in the monitoring
report and make notes that future monitoring efforts should follow the new photopoint
format. Note: the original photopoints portrayed in the BDR must always be replicated
unless the BDR is amended to not include certain photopoint locations.
8. TAKE FIELD NOTES! Do not rely on memory to complete the monitoring report.
9. Make an effort to meet with the landowner after the field visit to discuss any minor,non-
violation issues or other observations made while conducting the field visit. Do not,
under any circumstances,discuss potential minor or major violations to the
conservation easement with the landowner. UP2SaVe has specific procedures to
follow when addressing potential violations(see UP2Save'S Conservation Easement
Violations Policy).
Approximate monitoring completion time: 4-16 hours depending upon driving time and
size/complexity of property.
Post-monitoring Due Diligence:
Post-monitoring due diligence primarily consists of developing documentation of the
monitoring visit. This documentation consists of:
1. Filling out the monitoring report
2. Creating a monitoring map including the photopoints,access points,monitoring track,
and any other points of interest.
3. Writing a letter to the landowner that summarizes the monitoring visit and also states that
the landowner is in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement. If the
landowner is not in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement,then staff
will follow the UP2Save'S Conservation Easement Violations Policy.
4. Properly duplicate the monitoring report and file all copies according to the
UP2 Save'S Stewardship Records Management Policy.

5. Mail the signed monitoring report and compliance letter to the landowner and any
representatives listed in the baseline or that have received monitoring reports in the past.
6. Schedule the next monitoring visit based upon observations in the field and seasonal
access to the property.
Approximate completion time: 3 hours

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 201_ by and between ,
("Grantor") and ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d)
listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open-space aspects of real

property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open-space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers.The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately acres, more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Mitigation Bank, Department of the
Army(DA) Action ID Number SAW- , entitled "Agreement to Establish
the Mitigation Bank in the River Basin within the State of
North Carolina", entered into by and between acting as the Bank Sponsor
and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Mitigation Site has been
approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable
stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third-Party," to
include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate
enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument
number SAW- ("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or
certification issued by the Third-Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area
described on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:

ARTICLE I.
DURATIONOF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual.This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited.The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement
Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous
vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved
in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years
from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed
by and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails.There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing

roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands
within the Conservation Easement Area, is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Enter Sponsor Name, the Grantee, its
employees and agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area..
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural

condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement
Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area in accordance with the approved Mitigation Plan, and the
Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Enter Sponsor Name, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are
allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such
areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by
Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the
Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by

appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach.The Corps
shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and
conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons._
B. Subsequent Transfers.The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area.The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation

Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment.The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and §501 (c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability.The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the
entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and
supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to
the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except
those incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the
Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor
of the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long-Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated
with fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These
activities include the maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures, as deemed
necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the
boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds.This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Sponsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this
grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the Mitigation Plan,_prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor
and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the

Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]

Appendix D — DWR Stream Identification
Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Summary
REACH FF1 FF2 FF3 FF4 FF5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ) 21.5 16.5 13 21 17
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 3 2 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 1 2 2 1 2
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool,step-pool, 2 3 1 2 1
rinnle-nool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 3 2 1 3 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 3 2 2 2 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 2 1 2 2 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 1 1 1 1 1
8. Headcuts 1 1 0 1 2
9. Grade control 1 1 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1
11.Second or greater order channel 3 0 0 3 0
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ) 11 5.5 9 10.5 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 3 2 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 1 1 2 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1 0 1
16.Organic debris lines or piles 1 1 1 1 1
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? 3 0 3 3 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = ) 12 9 8 12 9
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 2 3 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 3 2 3 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 2 2 2 2 2
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 0 0 1 0
22. Fish 1 0 0 1 0
23.Crayfish 1 1 1 1 0
24.Amphibians 1 1 1 1 1
25.Algae 0 0 0 0 0
26.Wetland plants in streambed 0 0 0 0 0
Total Points (Subtotal=) 44.5 31 30 43.5 32.5
Stream Determination Perennial Perennial Perennial Perennial Perennial

--
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Fr 1
Date: Ll / 17 f ic6 Project/Site: V r-e n MQ Sc Latitude:
Evaluator: M D�v,fit. County: yAP k,'r Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 5 Ephemeral Intermittent ere e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = a\, ) Absent 1 Weak Moderate Strong
fa.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 i
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 if) 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 (3)
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 Z 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ( 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 (.) 1 5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 C�
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 des= 3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11 _)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 1Q 3
14. Leaf litter � 1 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 :5) 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 U 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No= 0 Yes=
C. Biology (Subtotal = l"; )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 20 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 © 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 (I) 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 't\ 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ StreamIi
Identification Form Version 4.11 PI,t(X7 }-F2
Date: L( !i-9• ] Project/Site: rv0 Latitude:
Evaluator: � i 12 i County: l/aV;ri Longitude:
Total Points:Stream is at least intermittent \ Stream Determination(circl ne) Other
Ephemeral Intermittent Pre 'al e.g. Quad Name:
ifz 19or perennial if>_30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = N, . ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 23
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 .T 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 0 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ® 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 0 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 10 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 cf5
11. Second or greater order channel 47 : Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =3.(0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2) 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 n 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 C) 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 Q 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 Q 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? �6 N ` Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = c 1 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 0 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 T) 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish C0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 6 _ 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 (1) 1.5
25.Algae 'c,D 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0 _
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 }- 3
Date: 9 11-1 I8 Project/Site: ( ' Latitude:
Evaluator: moc Q r() County: 11od f I� l Longitude:
Total Points: Y 1
Stream is at least intermittent
3o Stream Determination(circle . Other
Ephemeral Intermittent erenmal e.g. Quad Name:
i if 19 or perennial if?30* P
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = lll ) Absent Weak Moderate _ Strong
1a'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 (D 3
-
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 CD 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 (?� 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 ?) 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 11 2 3
8. HeadcutsII0, 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 _ 1.5 _
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 r0
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 _ Yes =3
a artificial ditches are not rated:see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 41 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 O 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 01 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 s=
C. Biology (Subtotal=_ :,-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 0 ' 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 (2) 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 Q 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks © 1 2 3
22. Fish Z) 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 C(y 1.5
25.Algae 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ' \°'" C s+ 9
Date: L/1 7 `j C Project/Site: Gre D el Me c7 q Latitude:
Evaluator: M (DeA.", c\ i ty County: '4cJ k;`i Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination(circ _one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 4 3 P s 5 Ephemeral lntermittentcPerennia g e. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30" l �i
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = °� 1 ) Absent Weak 1 Moderate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 (S,
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 CD 2 3
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 Z3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 03
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 (I 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 Q 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 C1) 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1
8
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No= 0 es=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10. 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 a
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 0 3
14. Leaf litter Q� 1 0.5 0
_
15, Sediment on plants or debris l"J 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 CID 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 s=23 i
C. Biology (Subtotal = r j,___,
18. Fibrous roots in streambed (3) 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed ( ) 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 (2) 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 Et 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 0 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 CD 1.5
25. Algae c(?'• 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 f F5
Date: L 1.--4,1 C g. Project/Site: to yeeN1 Ma% Latitude:
Evaluator: M �} -6 -r\ County: yo 4 \.i r Longitude:
Total Points: ' Y Stream Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is at feast intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent e�efirl' t e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if?30' A.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = , ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 _ 1 (2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 r, 3
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 125 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 a 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
J
8. Headcuts 0 1 _ 0 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 'C1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 .,--_ 0.5 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel (No Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual �
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =_ (0•J }
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 (. 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 (I) 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 (,3) 1.5
•
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 CD 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? o-0 Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed P 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish - 0.5 1 ...
1.5
23. Crayfish Ef 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 0 1.5
25.Algae 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Appendix E — USACE District Assessment
Methods/Forms

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet Summary
FF1-A FF1-B FF1-C FF1-D FF2 FF3 FF4 FF5
1 Presence of flow/persistent 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
pools in stream
2 Evidence of past human 2 2 2 1 5 4 1 4
alteration
3 Riparian zone 1 4 1 1 3 2 1 2
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 2
discharges
5 Groundwater discharge 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 0
�a
U
.N 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 3 1 4 3 4 4 2 3
T
s
a
7 Entrenchment/floodplain access 1 1 0 1 4 4 1 1
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 1 3 3 0 2 4 0 0
9 Channel sinuosity 3 4 3 1 3 3 1 3
10 Sediment input 2 3 1 1 2 2 0 2
11 Size&diversity of channel bed 4 3 1 1 3 1 3 3
substrate
12 Evidence of channel incision or 0 2 0 1 3 3 1 1
widening
13 Presence of major bank failures 5 5 1 2 5 3 1 3
La 14 Root depth and density on banks 5 3 2 1 4 3 1 3
H 15 Impact by agriculture,livestock, 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 1
or timber production
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool 4 4 3 1 4 2 2 3
complexes
17 Habitat complexity 4 4 2 2 4 2 3 3
.1° Canopy coverage over
a 18 streambed 2 4 2 1 4 3 1 3
I
19 Substrate embeddedness 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 2
20 Presence of stream invertebrates 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
rn 21 Presence of amphibians 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
0
0
m 22 Presence of fish 3 3 3 2 0 0 2 0
23 Evidence of wildlife use 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1
Total Score: 58 65 41 34 68 55 34 46

Site: Green Mesa
Date:4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
F f\--0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal - SCORE
Piedjnogt Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream , `
1 (no flow or saturation_0;strong flow=max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 `'�
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-5 0-5 0-5
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration-max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0 4 Q- S t
(no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) l
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive discharges-0;no discharges=max points)
a Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
e; 5 (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain ) 0-4 0-4 0-2
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points
7
Entrenchment/floodplain access
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points) 0-5 0-4 0-2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 (no wetlands=0; Iarge adjacent wetlands=max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2
y
Channel sinuosity
9 (extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) 0 5 4-4 0-33
10 Sediment input 0 5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition=0;little or no sediment=max points)
I 1 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate ) NA* 0 4 0-5
(fine,homogenous=0; fares,diverse sizes=max points
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 f
H (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points) lt'
r 13 Presence of major bank failures _ 0-5 0-5 0-5 -
(severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks-max points)
d 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5
4 (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points)
ri Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production
15 s>I
(substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 Z
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points) - 9
L 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 1-1-
(little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points)_ _
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0 5 2
x (no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 4 0-4
(deeply embedded=0;loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) I 0-4 0-5 0-5
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
(7 Presence of amphibians
O 21 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0 4 0-4 4-4
0 22 Presence of fish
- _ (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
23 -
Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0 5
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) %PA 5(22
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Site: Green Mesa
l R Date:4/17/2018
J Evaluators: RTM & MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream W
l 0—5 0—4 0—5
(no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points)
ii
Evidence of past human alteration
2 (extensive alteration—0;no alteration=max points) 0—6 0—5 0 5 Z
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) ©—6 0 4 0—5 `4 c�
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0—5 0—4 0—4 �1 l
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0—3 0—4 0—4 3
U (no discharge=0;springs, seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0_4 0—4 0—2
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points) 1
aEntrenchment/floodplain access 0—5 0 4 0—2
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 (no wetlands=0;large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0—6 I 0—4 0—2 3
Channel sinuosity 0 5 0—4 0—3LI
(extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points)
10 Sediment input 0—5 0—4 0—4
(extensive deposition=0;little or no sediment=max points) _ 3
1! Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0—4 0—5 3
(fine,homogenous=0;large,diverse sizes—max points)
•
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12 0-5 0-4 0-5
H (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
" 13 Presence of major bank failures 0—5 0—S 0—S
14 (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points) _
14 Root depth and density on banks
F. visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points) 0—3 0—4 0—5 3
- Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production
15 (substantial impact�;no evidence=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—5
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0—3 0--5 0—6
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points) _ y
d 17 Habitat complexity 0—6 0—6 0—6
�' (little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0—5 0—5 0—5
(no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 4 0—4 3
(deeply embedded—0; loose structure=max)
Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4)
20 0—4 0—5 0—5
y, (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4 0-4 0-4
C0 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
14
p4 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0_6 0—5 0—S
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) uT
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Site: Green Mesa
7/2018
—4 Date:
Evaluators: RTM && MDE MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE - SCORE
_ Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points) 0-5 4 4 0-5 II
Evidence of past human alteration2
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration=max points) fl-6 Y 0 5 0-5 .2
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) 0-6 0-4 0 5 t
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 5 0-4 0 4
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points)
Groundwater discharge
5 (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points) 0--3 0-4 0-4
Ld
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2
9
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points)
a Entrenchment/floodplain access
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points) 0-5 0-4 0 2 `�
Presence of adjacent wetlands
$ (no wetlands=0;large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 3
Channel sinuosity
9 (extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) 0-5 0-4 0-3
10 Sediment input ) 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition=0;little or no sediment=max points
Size&diversity of channel bed substrate
11 (fine,homogenous=0; large,diverse sizes=max points) NA* 0-4 0 5
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 v 0---4 0-5 -�
(deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
E Presence of major bank failures
13 0-5 0-5 0-5
(severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 I F„, (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points) -
rs) Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production
15 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
(substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) _
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-b 3
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points)
d 17 Habitat complexity 0 6 0-b fl-6
E (little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points) -
t
1 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 "�
x (no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points) G
Substrate embeddedness
19 (deeply embedded=0;loose structure=max) NA* 0-4 0 4
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) _
0 Presence of amphibians
O 21 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0-4 0-4 0 4 `
O 22 Presence of fish
3
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0 4 0-4 0-4
Evidence of wildlife use
23 0-6 0-S 0-5 1
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence-max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) f )
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. i
2
-

Site: Green Mesa Date:
4/17/2018
Evaluators: EWT&MDD
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET R
ec,G In FFI. — D
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal tii cant- Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points) 0 5 0 4 0-5 i
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
(extensive alteration =0;no alteration=max points) _
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
(no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges p 5 0-4 0-4 '1`1
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points) cx
ra 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0 4
U (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points)
* 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0 2 L
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points) -
7 Entrenchment/floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-217-4
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points)
$ Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 6 0-4 0-2 0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0 3
(extensive channelization_0;natural meander=max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition=0; little or no sediment=max points)
I 1 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NM 0-4 0-5
(fine,homogenous=0;large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 0 4 0-5
;.a (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
Presence of major bank failures
13
ra 0-5 0-5 0-52.
1„0 (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 1�
(no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points)
co') Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production O
15 0-5 0--4 0-5
(substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0 W 6
I
(no riffles/ripples or pools-0;well-developed=max points)
Habitat complexity
17 0-6 0-6 0-6
(little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed }
18 0-5 0-5 0-5 !
(no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0 4
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 a
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
C7 21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0-4 0-4
0 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
O Presence of fish
0 22 0-4 0-4 0- 4 a
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
Pel
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0_6 0-5 0-5
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence- max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 3 V
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Site: Green Mesa
Date:4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
.jfZ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream 0_5 0-4 _ 0-5
(no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2 0-6 0-5 0-5
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration=max points)
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
Groundwater discharge
5 (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
Li
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6 (no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points) 0-4 0-4 0 2
Entrenchment/floodplain access
p" (deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding max 0-5 0-4 0-2 r
( p y q g= points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands=0;large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0-6 _ 0-4 0-2 -
Channel sinuosity 3
9 (extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) 0-5 0-4 0 3
10 Sediment input 0--5 0-4 0-4 Z
(extensive deposition=0;little or no sediment=max points)
11 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 3
(fine,homogenous=0;large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
(deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
,,,,,, Presence of major bank failures
►a 13 (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 S.
14 Root depth and density on banks
E-1 (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points) 0-3 0-4 0-5 14
r/ Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
F (no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points) _
L 17 Habitat complexityLI
p=i (little or no habitat=0; frequent,varied habitats=max points) 0-6 , 0-6 0-6
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5
i (no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
Substrate embeddedness 3
19 NA* 0-4 0-4
_ (deeply embedded=0; loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) _
C' 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
4 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0--4 0-4i
t:4 ono evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use p_6 0-5 0 5 ii
(no evidence-0;abundant evidence=max points) 1
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) LOS
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Site: Green Mesa
Date:4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—5
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0—6 0—5 0—5
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration=max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
(no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) o
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges—0;no discharges=max points) 0—5 0—4 0 4 1
Groundwater discharge
5 (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points) 0—3 0—4 0—4 Z
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain p_4 0—4 0—2 •
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points)
Entrenchment/floodplain access
a. 7 0-5 0-4 0-2
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 (no wetlands=0;large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0—6 0—4 0—2
Channel sinuosity 0—5 0—4 0—3
(extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition=0;little or no sediment=max points)
I 1 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0—4 0—5
(fine,homogenous=0;large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening p—5 0—4 0—5
F (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures 0 5 0 5 0—5
(severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points)
a 14 Root depth and density on bankset ) 0_3 D—4 0—5
F
(no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points
t/0 Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production
15 (substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—S `
i 6 Presence of riffle-poot/ripple-pool complexes p—3 0 5 0—6 r
F (no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points)
F17 Habitat complexity 0—6 0—6 0—6 2
-0 (little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points)
I.00 Canopy coverage over streambed
i8 0-5 0-5 0-5
(no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
1 Substrate embeddedness NA* fl 4 0—4
(deeply embedded=0;loose structure=max)
Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4)
20 0—4 0—5 0—5
(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0
C' 21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0 4 0—4 1
d _(no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
0 22 Presence of fish ) 0-4 0-4 0-4
1.4 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points
23 OA
Evidence of wildlife use 0—6 0—5 0—5
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
-TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) -SC—
.
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
UY4

Site: Green Mesa Date:
4/17/2018
Evaluators: EWT&MDD
S2. Li STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
II CHARACTERISTICS - — SCORE
Coastal , mont� Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—5
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0 6 0 5 0—5
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration=max points)
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) 0—6 0 4 0 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0_5 0—4 0—4 a
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0_3 0—4 0—4 0
C.) (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points)
- 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 4 0 4 0—2 a
>4 (no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points)
: Entrenchment/floodplain access
7
p' (deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 0-6 0-4 0-2 J
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0—5 0—4 0—3 i
(extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) E
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 (.)
(extensive deposition=0; little or no sediment=max points)
1 I Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0—4 0—5
(fine,homogenous=0; large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0—5 0—4 0—5
>4 (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
i„ Presence of major bank failures
a 13 (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points) D—5 0 5 0 5
r-1
14 Root depth and density on banks 0—3 0—4 0 5
F., (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points)
z Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production
]5 (substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—5
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0—3 0—5 0—6
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
17 Habitat complexity 0—6 0—6 0—6
04 (little or no habitat=0; frequent,varied habitats=max points)
P1 Canopy coverage over streambed
►TQi 18 0-5 0-5 0-5
(no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 4 0—4
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0—4 0—5 0 5 a
> (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0—4 0 4 0 4 a
O (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
O22 Presence of fish 0—4 0—4 0—4 `)..
FWM
4 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0—6 0—5 0—5
A.
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 3 y
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Site: Green Mesa
Date:4/17/2018
Evaluators: RTM & MDE
..'F- b STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
1 ono flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points) 0 5 0-4 0-5
Evidence of past human alteration r,
2 (extensive alteration=0;no alteration =max points) 0-6 _ 0-5 0-5 -
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
(no buffer=0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) a
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points) a
5 Groundwater discharge 0_3 0-4 0-4
C.) (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points)
MI 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0_4 0_4 0-2 3
(no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points)
Entrenchment/floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2
Po (deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 (no wetlands=0;large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0-6 0-4 4-2 ` `�
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0 4 0-3 3
(extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) , -
1 O Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 c.
(extensive deposition=0; little or no sediment=max points)
I l Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5
3
_ (fine,homogenous=0;large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 0 4 0-5
,` 4 (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
M"„ Presence of major bank failures +
14 13 (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points) 0-5 0-5 0 5
dam' Root depth and density on banks
l4 (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points) 0-3 0-4 0-53
F
o1 Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production l
15 (substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) 0-5 0 4 0-5 1
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points) 3
17 Habitat complexity 0_6 0-6 0-6
F (little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points)
18 2
Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0 5 0-5 3
(no shading vegetation=0;continuous canopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4
(deeply embedded=0;loose structure=max) a
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0_4 0-5 0-5
>1 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
rr} 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 '
O (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) _ _
Presence of fish
5 22 (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points) 0 4 0-4 0-4
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0 6 0 5 0-5 1
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) Lk0
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
t

Appendix F — Wetland JD Forms & Maps

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW-2017-01466 County: Yadkin U.S.G.S. Quad: Yadkinville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Frazier Farm of North Carolina,LLC
Address: 3532 Baptist Church Road
Boonville,NC 27011
Telephone Number:
Size(acres): 20 acres Nearest
Town: Boonville
Nearest Waterway: Tanyard Creek Coordinates: 36.213246,-80.718195
River Basin/HUC: Upper Yadkin
Location description: The site is located
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters,including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The
waters,including wetlands, have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable.Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation.For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation
requirements,and other resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may request an approved JD,which is an
appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§ 403).However, since the
waters,including wetlands, have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33
USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S.including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed,the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA

jurisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S.including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311).Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§ 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext.4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual:Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region(version 2.0).These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S.,at this site,were verified on-site by the Corps on May 8,2018 and are as approximately
depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map(dated 10/27/2017).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate
participation in USDA programs,you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and request for appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele,Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by N/A(Preliminary-JD).
2

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** lly signed by
ELLIOTT.WILLIAM.AN w°
INJ:c=US,o=U.S Gwx nnert,ou=UaD,ou-Pp,
Corps Regulatory Official: THON Y.1048694604 UO .W LLAMAM qN.1098 H9804
Date:2018.0823115212 04'00'
William Elliott
Issue Date of JD: August 23,2018 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cmapex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Jeremy Schmid, 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110,Raleigh,NC 27605
3

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Frazier Farm of North Carolina,LLC File Number: SAW-SAW-2017-01466 Date: August 23,2018
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The ollowing identifies your righ and options -garding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx o
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b)modify the permit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT:You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
4

SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting,and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele,Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn:William Elliott CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15
828-271-7980,ext. 4232 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn.:William Elliott,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn: Mr.Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
5

6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)FORM
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: August 23,2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Frazier Farm of North Carolina,LLC
3532 Baptist Church Road
Boonville,NC 27011
C. DISTRICT OFFICE,FILE NAME,AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A,SAW-2017-01466,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S)AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The site is located
State: NC County/parish/borough: Yadkin City:Boonville
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal format):36.213246,-80.718195
Universal Transverse Mercator:NAD83
Name of nearestwaterbody: Tanyard Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office(Desk)Determination. Date: August 23,2018
®FieldDetermination. Date(s): May 8,2018
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site Centered Coordinates Estimated A mount Type of Aquatic Geographic
Number (decimal degrees) of Aquatic Resource Resources Authority to Which
in Review Area Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude (linear feet or acre) "May Be" Subject
FF1-A 36.212223 -80.724609 1013 if ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF1-B 36.212189 -80.722394 7241f ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF1-C 36.213772 -80.720389 815 if ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF1-D 36.215554 -80.718159 1609 if ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF2 36.211115 -80.723753 637 if ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF3 36.210798 -80.719211 14941f ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF4 36.216467 -80.722795 10371f ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
FF5 36.214259 -80.716669 14421f ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
7

WA 36.212119 -80.723091 5.4 ac if ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
WB 36.213772 -80.720389 .28 ac ❑Wetland ® Section 404
®Non-wetland Waters ❑ Section 10/404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (MD)for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit(NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an MD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD,which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3)the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an MD or a PJD,the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an MD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an MD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
8

SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD(check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
®Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester:Vicinity,USGS,NWI,Soil,Existing
conditions,WOUS
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester.
®Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.Rational:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey(USGS)Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
®USGS map(s). Cite scale&quad name: Yadkinville.
❑Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Yadkin County,NC
®National wetlands inventory(NWI)map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)/Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial(Name&Date):UNK
or❑ Other(Name&Date):
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
ELLIOTT.WILLIAM.AN LLIOI..LLA ANTHONY 1048694604
DN:c=US,o=U.S.Govemment,ou=DOD,ou=PKI,
THONY.1048694604 Dd1e 018 310TT o13LIIATTHONV.1048694604
William Elliott,August 23,2018 Frazier Farm of North Carolina,LLC
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting
staff member completing preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
preliminary JD signature is impracticable)
Two copies of this Preliminary JD Form have been provided Please sign both copies.Keep one signed copy for your record
and return a signed copy to the Asheville Regulatory Field Office by mail or e-mail
US Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville,NC 28801-5006
9

I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time
frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
10

Aquatic Resources Table Update
Stream lengths have been updated to the surveyed lengths since the JD site visit on May 8, 2018, those
updates are reflected in the Aquatic Resource table below. Pond A has been added to the PJD, as it is a
portion of the project now.
Original PJD Included Reaches Latitude Longitude Length(ft)/
Reach ID Area(ac)
FF1-A FF1-A 36.212 -80.725 993 ft
FF1-B FF1-B 36.212 -80.722 1,132 ft
FF1-C FF1-C 36.214 -80.720 560 ft
FF1-D FF1-D 36.216 -80.718 1,452 ft
FF2 FF2 36.211 -80.724 602 ft
FF3 FF3 36.211 -80.719 1,943 ft
FF4-A
FF4 36.216 -80.723 849 ft
FF4-B
FF5-A 1,655 ft
FF5 36.214 -80.717
FF5-B
WA -- 36.212 -80.723 5.4 ac
WB -- 36.214 -80.720 0.28 ac
Pond A -- 36.213 -80.721 1.91 ac
Total Existing Wetlands 5.68 ac
Total Existing Stream Length 9,186 ft
Total Open Water 1.91 ac
*Lengths have been updated to reflect the surveyed length of the streams within the project easement

� Original PJD _ Length(ft)/
4+' _ r_ eac Included Reaches Latitude Longitude
R hl ID Area(ac)
'gip ±+
FF1-A FF1-A 36.212 -80.725 993
0 rye:
1 . FF1-B FF1-B 36.212 -80.722 1,132
s
M+, �*
` ll
- FF1-C FF1-C 36.214 -80.720 560
\ _ "_ '"'II!'
. FF1-D FF1-D 36.216 -80.718 1,452
\ / `,. FF2 FF2 36.211 -80.724 602
, FF3 36 211 80 719 3
FF3 1 94
- FF4 36.216 -80.723 849
s"' i 'ok �/ ,, k ' '� y; `^FF1-D„- FF5 36.214 -80.717 1,655
3 ;.. Nta. 1 WA 36.212 -80.723 5.4 ac
x �'�_ „.' WB -- 36.214 -80.720 0.28 ac
'i ;' ;� a a. ,,,, ;.;•..';,,,. PondA -- 36.213 -80.721 1.91 ac S
�C.t,` z g f'' ' ^- Total Existing Wetlands 5.68 ac
4 t , ` '4 nn -' Total Existing Stream Length 91 86Il
0 150 300
r,. �, r» Total Open Water 1.91 ac Feet
�M
°� "� '•C= 'Lengths have been updated to reflectthe surveyed length of the streams within the project
- ::,:,-.1*-:;':,= - 1 in 300 feet
�, \ ,y .;� easement =„ ' �� '" a ; ' Potential
' Wetland or Non-Wetland Waters
•. > of the U.S. Map
•,rb
r ppN
" .' Y A �` Green Mesa
A Mitigation
Project
. .e Psto,,, ,.. . ,r r
r
r'� Yadkin County, North Carolina
'• 4.F._ 1 WB
-R 4 • Date: 10/21/2020 Drawn by: MDE
'� .-- " O F l Revisions: 2 Checked by: JRM
� � . Legend
t,
M.
ti
Proposed Easement
'',v....,„;.
Pond Ai..--.•�",•-
r'` 1.=
IleLj "' ,�,.�' 'ItOr ..- �. f �
.�; , Existing Wetland
r ! � sus
f
�,. . 7.
:. `- . , ; Yr Existing Pond
• ,.
•
p§
A/ ,
WA ' { ' f® f Existing Stream
b •
6
f
J it
Wetland Datapoint
•
0 Upland Datapoint
fi,' ,� p x REFERENCE
# �k ' � IA 1)Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N.
2)Map Projection is NAD_1983 StatePlane
.. A � -' North_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet
_ lttkk:
err
A
;_; ,� ,t ��ti �i4+:� .moink+r4 �
I r_It"rt
0
. : v. •., %,• :: �����#ram

Ores
December 8,2017
Mr. William Elliott
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville,NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr.William Elliott,
Resource Environmental Solutions (RES) is pleased to present this Request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination for Green Mesa Stream Mitigation Site located in Booneville,Yadkin County,North Carolina.
As part of this scope of work,RES is submitting this request to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)for
a confirmation of the limits of Waters of the U.S. on the subject site.
The Green Mesa Site is a part of the Yadkin 01 Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank.The proposed
umbrella structure of the Bank is designed to initially permit five mitigation sites, and establish the umbrella
banking instrument for future mitigation sites. The first five sites are Gideon, Compass Point, Green Mesa,
Twiman, and Scout. These sites are identified as having potential to help meet the compensatory mitigation
requirement for stream impacts in hydrologic unit 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin.
The purpose of the proposed Site is to generate compensatory mitigation credits for inclusion in the RES
Yadkin 01 Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank in hydrologic unit 03040101 of the Yadkin River
Basin associated with Department of the Army permit authorizations pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act.
The stream channels on the site have been classified using the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
methodology.Current stream conditions along the proposed reaches demonstrate habitat degradation as a result
of impacts from livestock and a lack of riparian buffers. The restoration approach for this project will be a
combination of restoration, enhancement, and preservation. Proposed treatment activities may range from
minor bank grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. The objective of
this approach is to design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat improvements and ties into the
existing landscape.Within the boundaries of the proposed project,two jurisdictional wetlands are present.The
Restoration Plan for both sites is currently in development.
Attachments for Reference
- Jurisdictional Determination Request Form - National Wetlands Inventory Map
- Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form - Aerial Imagery
- Landowner Authorization Form - Soils Map
- Project Vicinity Map - Wetland Delineation Data Sheets
- Project Location Map(with topography) - Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map

Ores
RES respectfully requests that the Corps confirm this delineation of Waters of the U.S. on this property. I
will contact you in the coming days to arrange a site visit for this purpose. Please contact me at(919)
926-1473 if you have any additional questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
L.
Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Ecologist
Attachments
412 N.4th St.#300 1200 Camdlia Blvd.#220 1434 Odenton Rd. 10055 Red Run Blvd.#130 302 Jefferson St.#110 33 Terminal Way#431
Baton Rouge,LA 70802 Lafayette,LA 70508 Odenton,MD 21113 Owings Mills,MD 21117 Raleigh,NC 27605 Pittsburgh,PA 15219
701 E.Bay St.#306 5020 Montrose Blvd.#650 2750 Prosperity Ave.#220 1521 W.Main 2ntl Floor 3751 Westerre Pkwy.#A 5367 Tdephone Rd. 1371/2 East Main St.#210
Charleston,SC 29403 Houston,TX 77006 Fairfax,VA 22031 Richmond,VA 23233 Richmond,VA 23220 Warrenton,VA 20187 Oak Hill,WV 25901

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 12/8/17
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jeremy Schmid
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Asheville
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Yadkin City: Booneville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.213246 Long.: -80.718195
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: North Deep Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)

Site Reach/Wetland ID Latitude Longitude Length (LF)/Area (ac)
Green Mesa FF1-A 36.212223 -80.724609 1013
Green Mesa FF1-B 36.212189 -80.722394 724
Green Mesa FF1-C 36.213772 -80.720389 815
Green Mesa FF1-D 36.215554 -80.718159 1609
Green Mesa FF2 36.211115 -80.723753 637
Green Mesa FF3 36.210798 -80.719211 1494
Green Mesa FF4 36.216467 -80.722795 1037
Green Mesa FF5 36.214259 -80.716669 1442
Green Mesa WA 36.212119 -80.723091 5.4
Green Mesa WB 36.213772 -80.720389 0.28
*stream lengths will be updated upon completion of survey and final stream design

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity, USGS, NWI, Soil, Existing conditions, WOUS •
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24k Yadkinville
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
n N• ational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
n State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n F• EMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other(Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature al date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 3532 Baptist Church Road
City, State: Boonville, NC
County: Yadkin
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): see attached
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jeremy Schmid
Mailing Address: 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone Number: 919-926-1473
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
riInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Frazier Farm of North Carolina, LLC
Mailing Address: 3532 Baptist Church Road
Boonville, NC 27011
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Bank Site Landowner PIN County Deed Book & Parcel
Page Number Acreage
499000200499;
499000403703;
Frazier Farm of
Green 499000217656;
Mesa North Carolina' 499000310877: Yadkin 1084/410 273.44
LLC
499000223660;
499000117958

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: fl Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Landowner Authorization Form
Site: Frazier Farm
Property Legal Description
Deed Book: 1084 Page:410 County:Yadkin
Parcel ID Number:N/A
Street Address:3532 Baptist Church Road,Boonville,NC 27011
Property Owner: Frazier Fain'of North Carolina,LLC,a North Carolina limited liability company
The undersigned,registered property owner of the above property,do hereby authorize
Resource Environmental Solutions,the NC Division of Water Resources,and the US Army Corps of Engineers,
their employees,agents or assigns to have reasonable access to the above referenced property for the evaluation of
the property as a potential stream,wetland,and or riparian buffer restoration project,including conducting stream
and or wetland determinations and delineations,as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s)or
certification(s).
Property Owner Address:3532 Baptist Church Road,Boonville,NC 27011
IIWe hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge.
7 01/ 7
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) Date
14rl,P n e. .1r �, r 7 67A 7
(Property Owner Printed Name) Date

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
r 1 Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
I r l Size of Property or Review Area 20 acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.213246
Longitude: -80.718195
InA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters,waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States,wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
VIl Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
El Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
rj Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps,FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
nNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
nNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
L Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppA Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Legend
Proposed Easement
Qb
illb �r
o`
cr
Bepps
dA
Mosley Rd Baptist Church Rd
l"8
t Hill - ITI
Elkin Boonville
J esville
4 iJ I
r ;
1
zv Yadkinville . _
0
rnut
-\ti Mabel Trl
I
Date: 11/29/2017
O
w m E Vicinity Map
"VHF- Drawn by: RTM
soo Green Mesa Mitigation Site res
.,., 0Feet Yadkin County, North Carolina

, /„,__....., li.
wr, ‘/ , ,,,n r1"r /r � _ �J 1_.,..Gret ,Hiy $i 41L- 140-, � -
. .
t ,, , „. , :„.
_. ,.. , _ _ .:-.......„Ala,* 4 AllatiaL2i: il ....--1 '.
i ,i iii ii : 4-11:11:11-1W_ ._111111LEMNIN •
AD: . . mar , -41.1
ce
il
n pry�/ t tl t>a� ••••i. :µ ,
•- jr N_A , • . . igibii
, t
i, . , , • . .„,., , , __ _
II
A i dp : !-:T--to...0.. —,.sk*y ku, ,
, -- ,-:.: -----) ,... .
' T 1 I 1 % i •..4 SNI\%k )\,y • ik----- (2 J il k . • ‘_,__L__..th i'
e• ., N, ',ler
.��� • r i _ate
--•--..; p.li-o -f---------- " "N'• )•"-` - /1111, '"4111 iii r
Q . mt.
,. ...._ , __,„„,,--- i . N, 4 cc..? .023
_ j( (
p, i
,...,,- ..v./ .0, ,t_.,--i7./.3, ,
1:%si.t.
) 7-j- .. 0)1111
,, o-_, *.--
_.=.=,
,,,,,2 7,,,
... b
f ,...,_ ________ , ____ • ., ,, , © LA C,....71 cK3 i .„.., 7'`a.* A
__ e -.71.11 if--------:---)- - ,_,,,,.....„ - ,, , ,
Ai,„„,,,,,,,, ,... ---,,, -7 I
ft
j 1 y lorifflram• }� --�w- �„j '/cik, lit
_u
p) ( --- -,,,IA-,..i--
-_!-Low----, -ib
. .. ,i,r
.. ...
t ,:.,. \ , . -. .
L...„ \ ` ��e �� � y, , r
r„.„?...„ . ,,:sitiii.„,...., :IN L.\
_ --.) i' . ddli:lit.I � tt
too ' \ -,,, , ilr ,
..,.=• -.4k.i14144 ,....,
Q___,
•• r,
1
i v _. �oi,
► 4
._.=...,-. I FL ;0,-7,-
`r•� ,_ a: r xrrG?
7---Nimik
d
�y c ,/
, / t.,,, 1 ---,ft /
n (N. r , 4 0- . ._
na \.„ ., . , - ,:s; 1 ,••
.,,, (1/4 vor..42
L7 lif i
16 tr,>••.___'" at tt,- ---)..\,,r), 011. ____.---_--.."
I.. 4 •••Azar_\8 � r�1'-__ _f ,p. a1•. _.._ — ,— .
`�, t ol --/Bliria_ •,k.
41,0 a NI
, 1_
A a S
, .• , .,
, ...,
,‘ 4
,....) ,
VA4 •IUit:s .,• L„a-,
.,,
. 1
E � ��. rt. , C
- Legend INV. ,� o t - ` _ . ��el-
1 .4.- . ....5
Proposed Easement .� ► � �-Ni , �1 O
,w, / J �-- ^�, t.tt - `�; � CopJg�t©2013 National Geographic,Sooiety,i o�ub
USGS Map Date: 11/29/2017
wE Drawn by: RTM
_ YYYs Green Mesa Mitigation Site res
g 01,000 2,000
Feet Yadkin County, North Carolina

CM MEI
FdE2 Gal Cl2Gal
MO MEI
On FdD2 Qi itiEl CZ
2 FdE2 egg
MS
GM �.�
ICwl
CGS
alta
es
C
6/59
MP FdD2
: MD QED
MD 1
MS
Z" 1 FdE2
1153
ega
1221
FdD2 e'
en es
MD MEI
ens er) \ CgC2
es IZEI
MI
CgB2
.. j
k
Map Unit Map Unit
S bol Map Unit Name Name Map Unit Name
Legend �'r"
Clifford sandy clay loam,6 to 10%slopes, Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam,10 to 25%slopes,
CcC2 moderately eroded FgD2,FgE2 moderately eroded
Proposed Easement - Codorus loam,0 to 2%slopes,occasionally °
CrA flooded FtF Fairview-Stott Knob complex,25 to 45%slopes,stony ,,
Non-hyd ri c Soil DeA Dan River sandy loam,0 to 3%slopes, HsA Hatboro soils,0 to 2%slopes,frequently flooded
IPartially Hydric Soil FaE fre.uentl Fairview fine sanfloodedd loam,15 to 25%slo.es RdF Rhodhiss-Stott Knob Com.lex,25 to 45%slo.es,ston
FdD2,FdE2 Fairview sandy clay loam,10 to 25%slopes, SmE,SmF Siloam sandy loam,15 to 50%slopes
moderate) eroded
Hydric Soil
FeD3,FeE3 Fairview clay loam,10 to 25%slopes,
severe) eroded
Date: 11/29/2017
w m E Soils Map
1V�� Drawn by: RTM
g 0 250 soo Green Mesa Mitigation SiteO
Feet Yadkin County, North Carolina

• '74;47 P.'IO:i',f
'"4.,,,':;:..-,\A',-,4%;!:r1,11,1 ,.'::.'.?-. ''.'''',i14,-'';•1,:;.,,qe"'/'11--',
•' 'i,"f '''''\''.,t :' , 74,',''.'N., ''''.4.:.'../ •'.:''.',-07;IrT,If..,.,:•,,,4.:',*. ,,P',/,,,://p.,,. .i
' , 5,• ''.',1,. ' .,., ..... . ,',1 ,'., '',.'.-•'' :.V:i:t:Es' ;:,,:.:;.i,,,:;'f':-:..'';'';.,/,/,f;:'....444,
, ,,... . .,, :-.,,,.... „•,.. . :.. _ .,,,,,t.\ , .4,f,,,, , ,.,,, :•. :•.-. '7/. ,8'i? ''o,. '
.
''' ' ' ' .''''''''':-'... .--' ' '•' ' - -''-7''. 1°''''. '''' ,. ''' ' ''1'::: \ '''1/4, 4,4„*„,. . . , - ,. --• ..<:.„--,:„.7,..1
•77. ...,, ,- • -41 - „,:- ..'' ' = '4 r , , . 8 -•,,.".,„,41',8,'8.. ' ' .,'0'- - ' - '$4- N.,8,/AV", '•'• -."8-8,riF',---- -' -
,'„,,,,,` '..4 -,:.•,-. r-, •,,,,,,,,_-r-, r • ',',' ,. '.',. .. r. ... --,,,r,r :r.,' ; '. :,,,,',-,A'. :'..:"., Nt .;',/,,le&-,:,,(47..,Y,,,,3-!.1.-: ,,'- -
•_4 ,.,-.,,,,,7•'-..- . --",-....,„*. '. , ' , . , -,.; •-• : .;,k7...',-,,,*.;;;J,. • -,,.' ,-.,,,..,,tv,,....:.-„:-...-.....,,,,:xerr-.-;':-.4,i,'r''r7:-'.'.,"-.,..r.f"i--z..1..-.;:.:r--:.m.:.-.:;;-;;.;-.:7.:'-4t7.,i.:;.,:-,-.-.,-.I...:--,,--,
-:-f-.,,,-,'::,-j._.,.--._,--'--':-,r7,,:--..7-,.,,v:-,....,:.::..',,''',,,Tr,•-,,,'-,,-.'•,-'A _.:.•-!:,,.',,-„'•„..-.,,..''.:.;..--,...--.,n,_..!.,. ,
'''.„,.'-,..,,..-.--:.,-1,-.,-„.',,,',,..,:'._-r,'.4r''''''';.'‘f..;,.,'./-'','2./..7_,''',,.,-,-i.',4 i-,-..-,•,,K-.-,i;:V
' :.=,_l.,-1,.,.:,.7'„-.,,.•.,-.,'::.-,:4'',-...7=;'7:•,1:!-„-':1,_-4-:,,,,":,..'.,'.-,,,.,`,•.'r1-.-..;'-':,—,.,-,--.1;•':4--*t-4*.:-..',_"'7..;'''I.'„..':'.,,.:.-`,.,,,,,'".;s.--„-,,„,„-.-.,.."T.,4-,7,-,:.",.,-.•-„,!-':'-.-;-.--.'.,,1 1.,,-.5.),,4,.-.,-,'..,,,:,.,,t,T-1'-.i,4,,"..'..,.„,,.-,„,*C,
,4;,.,':'',',,,-''',,,''''`-1.;''-'-.'.'-1_'.-,'1-,•k„-..;.i1„..--,-.'1,..1"„,,--.--..4:-,..-•,r1t,--S,1,,,i,i-:,.,r..';.r.n,,o..,-f,-::i,f'--- ''„,.;---,-4a„,,,;,-,,,,','7-..,.L,-„A!.','-/.-••','---'..„,it-',4'D,-t,.....-J,.4,44.,„,,1.„,4',-•.'„.''--r':-e',„.i,!'N-,,,,...,.,„,,:.•,•.',,,t..:ei4.i''.4'.'s.'t'--'t'',.-'s'7:--'„,-.v.:.'s"i.-v:.''*''"'-
'‘..-.''_.:..,-N.,'-,v.:,-..'.'P,,,';..-,..r,-.P;..r'.s'-:.'..':--.-,,....;,'•'-K'"-•f,,..1o..'.".-...t.*-..-,--::.:--.-;.s.;.-_---,-r,.-k.
--,.:'-,--.;.r..r.:„•-,_?,',.-;-;,-:-_,1-,-
.:,.f:.
,..,
.
-
-- -.„ V -.5.--:
,,,k,..-,_-:;,„,,..„-.7..:, . ik . „•..• ,,[ ,,,,,,,*-., ,,, „,, -,---...,,..,...,--i .,,.. .. - 's
- -
,..
-•....,,,,,,'
„,
,.,itri.
1/
y , -410, ,41;,:''' -,,,,,,,,•;;S. '•,.. .
_,
Ab. .
,';'"';..,-':'-'•* 'i'. ',
'.,%(' e•''.?' • 4-ti: i , '',8\
$.
. .
_ .
•
i, •
PUBHh
PSS1Ch
Legend
Proposed Easement
1
NWI Wetlands
, .IF,....
Site
L
Mitigation
Green Mesa
.@,
Gre
Carolina
North
w+
County, DrawnDle lblyi:29::
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Yadkin
500
1
250
0
Feet
.g.

'�^ 4 }ih�,, \ .-.. 4 ':. y
•
'•�"' ) \ 'c��a ' ' \a ' YCv f ee,.. r a i " ,.,,,,, . „,,,„0:,,,.,,,..,. ..,. f., .' J • ' `�. S
.,4,:- ' ,. ,,,,,,..,„
� t "
.\:„.:::41
" ,, `,did Ya \.n o d ` �•" _ x t',1`v` ,;�P �•.-��w Y ", j
' �� a t ,+ �
1 4 t ,�-_ 1 as a '.Et`ar, A•. r„ .
X .....; ,. a i''' 14
C' 5R
l p' ', to i _ •
,
tik.
)r: �e ;litit uuA\ \ l A,� - , a tl r.4 bpi. ��.
011)
1... : ,.,..,_ . .
.„ ., ,
•:____, 1-40,4.- , ,,,4' ,:,... - ,,,,,:: '
4
a �y. 5 w @. � k gait t # r # xiN # � ' aiiii.
rJ s- a • A a ,
iiitor- .. •,-,"'''''', . . .,,, „
r� a
,,, ,- 4,„.„.„..,4\, \ ,,
Q v `, yF K t
wI'r h Z Y Pi. 'Ma S\ � .„ 1
ON
r
m
,: s7• r a « DP-4
.a
-,',,,,,,:_.'„'•'.'1-.- ''''. . . '''' ' -
0
40,... ,. ,....
O
L
DP-1 a
•
ti° a
6
O
al c
.'1 . ' .,, , , , :‘,.::::1441.:.7,...7_,,.: 1. ffi M
FF
B
:'
1
a, :
r ,..,.. _
w., ._...
'- A li.
Legend ,
%
<, Upland Data Point • ,_
P W E
a
M '4
0 200 400
ISI
111( �n
Wetland Data Point v Feet
:"•t� PROJECT MANAGER:
� t
rr DRAvvN
Existing Streams
,,. `.. JOB NUMBER:
. Aµl{lN{g
Proposed Easement j DATE:
- x 10/27/2017
Existing Ponds REVISIONS:
Existing Wetlandsaimm NONE
Document Path:C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox(RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Green Mesa(Frazier Farms)\MXD\JD\GreenMesa_VVOUS_11x17.mxd - Date Saved:12/7/2017

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Green Mesa City/County: Yadkin County Sampling Date: 08-Nov-17
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): J.Schmid,M.DeAngelo Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.212617 Long.: -80.722573 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI classification: PF0
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
within a Wetland? Yes No 0
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
d❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑d Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑d Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑d Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches): _ 3
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP-1
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1• Salix niara 10 d❑ 25.0% OBL That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
2. Acer rubrum 30 d❑ 75.0% FAC
° Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4 o ❑ 0.0% -
5 o ❑ 0.0% - Percent of dominant Species
0 ❑ o.0% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
6. -
7 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ 0.0% - Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
40 =Total Cover OBL species 45 x 1 = 45
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
FACW species 45_ x 2 = 90
1• Alnus serrulata 20 d❑ 44.4% OBL
2. Liqustrum sinense 15 d❑ 33.3% FACU FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
3. Salix niara 5 ❑ 11.1% OBL FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
4• Rubus arautus 5 ❑ 11.1% FACU UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 o ❑ 0.0% Column Totals: 160 (A) 365 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.281
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 Dominance Test is>50%
0 ❑ 0.0%
1 0 Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
45 =Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.0% - Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.- o ❑ 0.0% - Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - o - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) 0 =Total Cover regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1. Persicaria saaittata 10 ❑ 13.3% OBL vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. Microsteaium vimineum 20 0 26.7% FAC Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3. Persicaria nensvlvanica
40 0 53.3% FACW regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4• Juncos effusus 5 ❑ 6.7% FACW Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
in height.
5. o ❑ 0.0%
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Five Vegetation Strata:
7. o ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% - ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10 0 ❑ 0.0% vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% - than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% - Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
75 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
0 ❑ 0.0% including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
1 species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% - m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% - Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
4. _ -
5. _ o ❑ 0.0% -
0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
6. 0 =Total Cover Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by RAG.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) _ Color(moist) ohColor(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C PL Silty Clay Loam
3-7 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/4 10 C PL Silty Clay Loam
7-12 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Silty Clay
1 Type: C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes CD No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Green Mesa City/County: Yadkin County Sampling Date: 08-Nov-17
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): J.Schmid,M.DeAngelo Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Footslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.212654 Long.: -80.722691 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
within a Wetland? Yes No ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches): _
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP-2
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1• Acer rubrum 50 d❑ 62.5% FAC That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
2. Pinus virainiana 15 ❑ 18.8% UPL
Total Number of Dominant
3. Pinus echinata 10 ❑ 12.5% UPL Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4. Juniperus virainiana 5 ❑ 6.3% FACU
5 o ❑ 0.0% _ Percent of dominant Species
6.
0 ❑ 0.0% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ 0.0% Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
80 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
FACW species 0 _ x 2 = 0
1• Liaustrum sinense 65 d❑ 81.3% FACU
2. Rosa multiflora 5 ❑ 6.3% FACU FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
3. Juniperusvirginiana 3 ❑ 3.8% FACU FACU species 90 x 4 = 360
4. Ilex°Baca 2 ❑ 2.5% FACU UPL species 25 x 5 = 125
5• Rubus arautus 5 ❑ 6.3% FACU Col umn Totals: 170 (A) 650 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 3.824
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
0 ❑ 0.0%
1 ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
80 =Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 o ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6. o ❑ 0.0% Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - - - (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 _) 0 =Total Cover regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1 - 0 ❑ 0.00/o vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2 0 ❑ 0.0% Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3.
0 ❑ 0.0% regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
o ❑ 0.0% Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
4' in height.
5. o ❑ 0.0%
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Five Vegetation Strata:
7. o ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
0
9. Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10 0 ❑ 0.0% vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% _ than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
0 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
1• Lonicera iaponiea 5 0 50.0% FACU including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. Smilax rotundifolia 5 0 50.0% FAC m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% _ Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
4. _
5. - o ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic
6. 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
10 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by RAG.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-2 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loam
2-12 5YR 4/6 100 Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Green Mesa City/County: Yadkin County Sampling Date: 08-Nov-17
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): J.Schmid,M.DeAngelo Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.213435 Long.: -80.721009 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,severely eroded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
within a Wetland? Yes No 0
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
d❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches): _ 6
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP-3
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 0 ❑ 0.0% That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
° Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% - Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4 o ❑ 0.0%5 o ❑ 0.0% - Percent of dominant Species
0 ❑ o.0% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
6. -
7 0 ❑ 0.0% - Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ 0.0% - Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
0 =Total Cover OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
1• Rubus argutus 5 d❑ 100.0% FACU
2 0 ❑ 0.0% _ FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
4. o •❑ 0.0% - UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 o ❑ 0.0% _ Column Totals: 100 (A) 180 (B)
6 0 ❑ 0.0% Prevalence Index= B/A= 1.800
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0% 0 Dominance Test is>50%
0 ❑ 0.0%
1 0 Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1
(Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 0 ❑ 0.0% be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. o ❑ 0.0% - Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.- o ❑ 0.0% - Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7 - - - (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) 0 =Total Cover regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1. Persicaria pensvlvanica 20 0 21.1% FACW vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. Persicaria saaittata 10 ❑ 10.5% OBL Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3. Juncus effusus
20 d❑ 21.1% FACW regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4• Carex sem:aria 5 ❑ 5.3% FACW Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
in height.
5• Microsteaium vimineum 10 ❑ 10.5% FAC
6• Svmphvotrichum puniceum 30 0 31.6% OBL Five Vegetation Strata:
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
0 ❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
9' Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10 0 ❑ 0.0% vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% - than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% - Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 95 =Total Cover Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
0 ❑ 0.0% including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
1 species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% - m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% - Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
4. _ -
5. _ o ❑ 0.0% -
0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
6. 0 =Total Cover Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by RAG.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 100 Silt Loam
3-8 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C PL Silt Loam
8-12 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes CD No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Green Mesa City/County: Yadkin County Sampling Date: 08-Nov-17
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): J.Schmid,M.DeAngelo Section,Township,Range: S T R
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Footslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.213603 Long.: -80.721038 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,severely eroded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ ,or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
within a Wetland? Yes No ❑
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift deposits(B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ FAC-neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches): _
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth(inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: DP-4
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 0 ❑ 0.0% That are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
° Total Number of Dominant
3 0 ❑ 0.0% - Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4 0 ❑ 0.0%
5 0 ❑ 0.00%0 - Percent of dominant Species
0 ❑ o.o% That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
6. -
7 0 ❑ 0.0% - Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 0 ❑ 0.00%0 - Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
0 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
FACW species 0 _ x 2 = 0
1 0 ❑ 0.0% -
0 ❑ 0.0% FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2. -
3 0 ❑ 0.0% - FACU species 95 x 4 = 380
4 0 ❑ 0.0% - UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5 0 ❑ 0.00/0 _ Column Totals: 95 (A) 380 CB)
6 0 ❑ 0.00%0 Prevalence Index= B/A= 4.000
7 0 ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$ 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 0 ❑ 0.0%
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
0 ❑ 0.0%
% ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0 =Total Cover ❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1 0 ❑ 0.0% data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 0 ❑ 0.0% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3 0 ❑ 0.0% 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4 0 ❑ 0.0%
5. o ❑ 0.00%0 - Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.- _ o ❑ 0.00%0 - Four Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ 0.0% Tree stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.
7._ - -- (7.6 cm)or more in diameter at breast height(DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) 0 =Total Cover regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding
1. Festuca arundinacea 90 d❑ 100.0% FACU vines,less than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% - Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
3 0 ❑ 0.0% regardless of size,and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
.
0 ❑ 0.0% Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
4' in height.
5. 0 ❑ 0.0%6 0 ❑ o.o°io Five Vegetation Strata:
7 0 ❑ 0.0% -
- Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,approximately 20
8 0 ❑ 0.0% - ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.(7.6 cm)or larger in
❑ 0.0% diameter at breast height(DBH).
0
9. Sapling stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
10 0 ❑ 0.0% - vines,approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
11. o ❑ 0.0% - than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
12 0 ❑ 0.0% Shrub stratum-Consists of woody plants,excluding woody
vines,approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) Herb stratum-Consists of all herbaceous(non-woody)plants,
1• Lonicera iaponica 5 0 100.0% FACU including herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
species,except woody vines,less than approximately 3 ft(1
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% - m)in height.
3. 0 ❑ 0.0% - Woody vines-Consists of all woody vines,regardless of
0 ❑ 0.0% height.
4. _ -
5. _ 0 ❑ 0.0% -
Hydrophytic
6. 0 ❑ 0.0% Vegetation
5 =Total Cover
Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix= National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks _
0-2 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loam
2-12 5YR 4/6 100 Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration.D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Dark Surface(S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral(Sl)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

Appendix G — Invasive Species Plan

INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. RES will treat invasive
species vegetation within the project area and provide remedial action on a case by- case basis. Common
invasive species vegetation, such as Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense),multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), will be treated to
allow native plants to become established within the conservation easement. Invasive species vegetation
will be treated by approved mechanical and/or chemical methods such that the percent composition of
exotic/invasive species is less than 5% of the total riparian buffer area. Any control methods requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA)rules
and regulations.If areas of invasive species exist within the easement,they will be monitored yearly as part
of the monitoring protocol, and treated if necessary. If required, problem areas will continue to be treated
until the project easement shows overall trending towards meeting all monitoring requirements.

Appendix H — Regulatory Agency Scoping
Letters

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
w yN 69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
° "�IIII ,;�'� WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
. l
" REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
November 15, 2017
Regulatory Division
Re: NCIRT Review of the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus:
Gideon Site (SAW-2017-01462), Compass Point Site (SAW-2017-01465), Green Mesa Site
(SAW-2017-01466), Twiman Site (SAW-2017-01467), and Scout Site (SAW-2017-01469).
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Attention: Ms. Cara Conder
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,North Carolina 27605
Dear Ms. Conder:
This letter is in regard to your prospectus document for the proposed RES Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The proposal consists of the establishment and operation of the
mitigation sites listed below:
Corps Action ID Site Name Easement County Stream/Receiving Latitude(°N) Longitude(°W)
(ac) Water
SAW-2017-01462 Gideon 8.6 Surry Mill Creek 36.3967 -80.8584
SAW-2017-01465 Compass 13.73 Yadkin Yadkin River 36.2696 -80.6384
Point
SAW-2017-01466 Green 19.96 Yadkin N.Deep Creek 36.2132 -80.7181
Mesa
SAW-2017-01467 Twiman 32.06 Yadkin N.Deep Creek 36.2130 -80.6902
SAW-2017-01469 Scout 14.0 Davie Hauser Creek 36.0322 -80.5166
The Corps determined the prospectus document was complete and issued a public notice
(P/N# SAW-2017-01462) on September 6, 2017. The purpose of this notice was to solicit the
views of interested State and Federal agencies and other parties either interested in or affected by
the proposed work. In addition,the Corps and members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT)
conducted field reviews of the proposed mitigation sites on October 16 - 18, 2017. Attached are
comments received in response to the public notice from the North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission, and a field visit memo incorporating comments from the attending IRT members.
The Corps has reviewed the information provided and considered the comments received
in response to the public notice and the field site visits. We have determined that the proposed
mitigation bank appears to have the potential to restore and protect aquatic resources within the
Upper Yadkin 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin.
Therefore,the bank sponsor may proceed with preparation of a draft Mitigation Banking
Instrument(MBI).
1

We appreciate your interest in restoring and protecting waters of the United States. If
you have questions concerning the path forward for the proposed mitigation bank,please do not
hesitate to contact me at(919) 554-4884 extension 59.
Sincerely,HUGHES.ANDREA.VV`n'
HHUGHISAND EAWADE.1258339165
DN:c=US,o=U.S.Government,ou=DoD,ou=PKI,
ADE.1258339165 Date:SA,cn1 15 11 25 11DOS REA. ADE.1258339165
- 0Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List
2

*Ft - . _
s •I
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager,US Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Andrea Leslie Y'd"--O `�
Habitat Conservation,NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: 26 October 2017
SUBJECT: Comments on RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Davie,Yadkin and Surry Counties
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)have reviewed
the final prospectus for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Site. NCWRC staff
attended site visits with regulatory agency staff October 16-18. The prospectus proposes stream
restoration, enhancement, and preservation on over 29,800 feet of stream to net over 18,000
SMUs in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101).
The bank includes five sites, and general comments on each site follow:
• Gideon Site. Located on a 76-acre parcel and sandwiched between two Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) sites, this agricultural site will involve restoration, enhancement,
and preservation on 4,092 ft of Mill Creek and unnamed tributaries (UTs)to Mill Creek,
netting 2,664 SMUs. The site is less than a mile upstream of the Mitchell River,which
serves as habitat for Brook Floater(Alasmidonta varicosa,US Federal Species of Concern,
NC Endangered). Excellent erosion and sediment control is especially important at both this
site and the adjacent DMS sites to minimize impacts to this mussel.
• Compass Point Site. This site is located on a 209-acre parcel in agricultural and forestry
uses. It was recently logged. The project will involve restoration and enhancement on 5,024
ft of UTs to the Yadkin River,netting 3,709 SMUs. The downstream end of the site is at the
confluence with the Yadkin River, and protection and enhancement of riparian habitat at this
location is especially ecologically beneficial, as it will provide a wildlife corridor that is
connected to the Yadkin River. We recommend that the landowner expand the forested
riparian area along the Yadkin River, as well. Two rare mussels [Creeper(Strophitus
undulatus,NC Threatened) and Brook Floater] are found in the Yadkin River in the vicinity
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh,NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

RES Yadkin 01 Mitigation Bank Page 2 October 26,2017
Davie,Yadkin,Surry Counties
of the project, and erosion and sediment control is especially important at this site to
minimize impacts to these species.
• Green Mesa. This site is on a 273-acre parcel in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 7,776 ft of UTs to North Deep Creek,
netting 3,531 SMUs. The old dam structure downstream of the present dam may serve as bat
habitat, and NCWRC biologists may perform bat surveys there in 2018.
• Twiman. This site is comprised of 10 parcels totaling 266 acres in agricultural use, and
project activities include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 10,477 ft of UTs to
North Deep Creek,netting 5,766 SMUs.
• Scout. This site is on two parcels totaling 522 acres in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration on 2,467 ft of Hauser Creek,netting 2,467 SMUs.
Detailed comments on the mitigation approach are captured in RES staff's October 16-18 site
visit summary. NCWRC staff has reviewed this summary and has provided comments on it in a
separate email.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance,please contact Andrea Leslie at(828) 400-4223 or at [e-mail].
ec: Travis Wilson and Oliva Munzer,NCWRC

MEMORANDUM 2res
302 Jefferson Street,Suite 110 Raleigh,North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
TO: NC IRT
FROM: Cara Conder,Brad Breslow-RES
DATE: 11/14/2017(revised)
RE: RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank IRT Site Visits
Attendees: Mac Haupt(NC DWR), Kim Browning (USACE),Andrea Leslie (NCWRC), Olivia
Munzer(NCWRC), Cara Conder(RES), Brad Breslow (RES), David Godley (RES)
Dates: October 16, 17, and 18, 2017
Gideon Site— 10/16/17
The Gideon Site is located between two disjunct portions of the recently contracted DMS Little
Sebastian full delivery site. While each project could be developed independently of the other,
the combined easements will result in a much larger contiguous protected corridor and high-
quality aquatic habitat. WRC mentioned that there are known occurrences of the brook floater
(Alasmidonta varicosa) in the Mitchell River, approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the
project area which RES mentioned in the Prospectus. Connecting the Gideon and Little Sebastian
Sites offer opportunities to create and protect habitat for the State protected species. IRT
members agreed the Gideon site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios
will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• DWR requested that RES determine the potential wetlands on site. RES is currently
delineating the site.
• MC3-A: Group agreed to restoration at 1:1 ratio as originally proposed in prospectus.
RES explained that cows have full access and the landowner has historically moved the
channel. RES affirmed that construction sequencing would harvest native bed material
when possible (e.g. cobble). The crossing will be a culvert.
• JN5—Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be more appropriate
approach for this reach instead of Enhancement II. Enhancement measures will include
grading banks, installing grade control structures (including at the tie-in with MC3-A),
planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion.
• JN4— Similar to JN5,the Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be a
more appropriate approach for below the crossing. Enhancement measures will include
removing pipe in old channel, fixing current culvert, grading banks, installing grade
control structures,planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion. Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio
is the approach for above the crossing and includes cattle exclusion and light
supplemental planting.

• MC3-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1,but the Group agreed to
change the approach to Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio because of channel condition and
cattle access. Enhancement measures will include planting the buffer on the left bank and
cattle exclusion.
• JN6-C—RES originally proposed restoration on this reach and Group agreed to that
approach. However,proposed alignment and restoration approach will need to be dictated
by topographic survey data. RES is in process of data collection, including delineating
slough feature. WRC suggested fencing slough area if not in alignment of proposed
restoration area. Barns will likely be removed and the culvert at the driveway will be
reset to improve hydrologic connection to JN6-B. WRC Comment: At the break between
JN6-B & JN6-A, there is an old road that is eroding. RES agreed to stabilize this road.
• JN6-B—RES originally proposed Enhancement II on this reach. DWR did not agree to
2.5:1 ratio due to buffer being intact,but does agree this reach should be part of the
overall project. The consensus was Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of
removing the crossing and cattle exclusion.
• JN6-A—RES originally proposed preservation on this reach. Group agreed to including
this top part of the reach as preservation. The JD will determine the limits.
Compass Point Site—10/16/17
IRT members agreed the Compass Point site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• DW6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. WRC and DWR
recommended more of an Enhancement I approach (ranging from a 1.5 to 2 ratio),which
would include bank work(spot stabilization), riparian buffer planting, and livestock
exclusion.
• DW1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio and Group agreed,with the
exception being the upstream most portion that ties into DW6. Group agreed that a mix of
Enhancement I and II would be best approach on the first 250 feet of DW1-A.
• DW2: Group agreed to Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio as originally proposed in
prospectus. RES confirmed that cows have access. Enhancement measures will include
planting the riparian buffer and cattle exclusion. DWR and RES agreed to installing a
stream gauge midway on the reach to monitor hydrology.
• DW1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. Group discussed
Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio with enhancement measures including a combination of
bed and bank work, complete riparian buffer planting, and cattle exclusion. DWR
Comment: there was some discussion of El, however, if that ratio is proposed vs the E2,
then the work needs to be justified in the mit plan. For the reach DW1-D, DWR believes
while it is a benefit to have a corridor connect to the Yadkin River,however,the ratio
that is appropriate would be no better than 7.5:1. USACE Comment: This will transition
from restoration in DW1-A at bedrock point. Buffered on one side, some areas do need
bank shaping. EII only if the banks are addressed. The existing road may cause the buffer
to be pinched to less than 50' at the end of the reach.
• DW 1-C: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. This reach has patches of high
quality bed material including cobble and bedrock. Group agreed a Priority II Restoration
approach,including benching to aid in floodplain connectivity, would be the best
measure.

• DW1-D—RES originally proposed Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio on this reach. WRC
wants to see this reach protected and included in the project. DWR and USACE
recommended a 7.5:1 ratio. The approach will be cattle exclusion and installing a boulder
grade control structure below the limits of restoration on DW1-C. WRC Comment: We
support the protection and riparian buffer enhancement of this reach, which would protect
a riparian corridor that would connect the Yadkin River to the site.
Green Mesa Site—10/17/17
Overall the site has clear potential for functional uplift, but there are a few notable constraints
including powerline easement and a large pond that will remain (landowner will not allow pond
to be part of project). Because the pond will remain in place, RES and USACE discussed
potentially retrofitting the riser structure to include a bottom pond drain to release cooler water.
IRT members agreed the Green Mesa site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• FF4 and FF 1-D: RES originally proposed restoration at a 1:1 ratio. The approach is a mix
of Priority I and II restoration with potential for enhancement level I above the powerline
based on bedrock in the channel. USACE said clearly justify rationale for restoration
measures.
• FF1-C: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio. DWR and USACE
stated if channel was left in place and enhancement II approach was taken that it was
likely for no credit to be given due to powerline and lack of buffer near the road. Group
discussed starting restoration immediately below Baptist Church Road and RES agreed
this was best option if feasible. WRC Comment: There was discussion of raising the bed
elevation to lessen the DOT culvert perch. The discussion on lower FF1-C being too
close to the road also applies to upper FF1-D. Turning the channel into the field
upstream of where it turns now could allow R credit for both.
• FF1-C (below pond): RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an
approach of cattle exclusion,buffer planting, and tying into the restoration area. There is
a large stone wall in this reach with a culvert that might need to be retrofitted (if
possible). Group agreed the best approach is probably to leave the wall in place and credit
the enhancement at 3:1. USACE Comment: I agree with your summary for both areas
above and below the pond. It's recommended that SHPO review this area(and the area
where the other historic wall is in the buffer in FF1-A).
• FF5: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, invasive species treatment, and supplemental planting on right bank. DWR
stated there is no cattle pressure and there is decent buffer on the banks,but invasives are
problematic (high density of privet). WRC would like some of the black walnut removed
and those areas replanted with a more diverse mix of native hardwood vegetation.
USACE and DWR suggested a ratio of 7.5:1; however, if buffer planting and easement
was extended to at least 100 feet a higher ratio could be approved.
• FF3-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. During the site visit RES suggested enhancement I at
a 1.5:1 ratio with an added measure of bank stabilization to reduce shear stress and in-
channel erosion. WRC agreed to rationale for enhancement I approach, but DWR stated
that there isn't much work needed on this reach and a ratio of 5:1 is likely most
appropriate (see FF3-B below). DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio

of 7.5:1. WRC Comment: We did not agree with the El approach, as this reach has a
stellar riparian forest; definitely agree on an E3 approach here, as light tough is needed
and riparian area is too nice to justify getting heavy equipment to address channel
erosion. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary
here. My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift.
The historic house in the buffer should be addressed.
• FF3-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and light supplemental planting. IRT suggested combining FF3-A and FF3-B
into one reach and having the entire crediting approach be enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio.
This area might be generating wetlands that RES would not be claiming credit. RES is
currently delineating the site. DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio of
7.5:1. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary here.
My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift,
especially considering these enter the pond. A narrative of historical farming practices
would be beneficial.
• FF1-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio and Group agreed and
stated to justify the uplift in the mitigation plan. WRC Comment: There is evidence of
beaver here.
• FF2: RES originally proposed preservation and Group agreed to a 7.5:1 ratio with an
approach of fencing where needed. DWR Comment: DWR could go with 7.5:1 on the
preservation (FF2) but would like to see the reach extended above the crossing at the top
and fenced out. WRC Comment: There was a discussion on preserving a little more
above the fence line and whether the old road would be planted/fenced. There was a
question on the location of the property line and end of preservation. USACE Comment:
Channel in good condition,USACE feels preservation at 10:1 is appropriate. The
discussion of 7.5:1 would be entertained if the upstream portion excluded cattle, as well.
• FF1-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. While there might be some opportunities for bank
work,the group agreed that the enhancement II approach was best based on the amount
of bedrock in this reach.
Twiman Site— 10/17/17
IRT members agreed the Twiman site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit
ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• TC2-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement I at 1.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion,buffer planting, and bank stabilization. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC2-B: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group generally agreed with this
approach, but did note there is a section of potential enhancement I below the pond. Upon
further data collection/analysis, RES will determine the best approach for this section of
TC2-B. WRC Comment: The group discussed establishing the break between EI and R
at the bedrock nickpoint.
• TC1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC3-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan.

• TC1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised,poor substrate,no buffer, channelized,with an available floodplain.
USACE& DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC4: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised,poor substrate,no buffer, channelized,with an available floodplain.
USACE& DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC5-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, and minor spot stabilization. IRT suggested a lower ratio of
3:1 in some areas based on existing buffer condition. RES recommends potentially
splitting the reach into different treatments based on level of intervention and will justify
rationale in mitigation plan.
• TC7: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan. USACE Comment: 3:1 ratio would be more appropriate.
• TC6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. This reach is in a deeply formed gully,but is currently
stable with the exception of multiple headcuts at the top of the reach. DWR suggested
"filling in"the reach to bring the bed up and credit as restoration with a 1:1 ratio. RES
expressed concerns with filling in the gully because thee stream might lose jurisdictional
status after construction with such a small watershed (roughly 20 acres). DWR Comment:
Reach TC6 may not be a creditable reach. While I feel that the only beneficial treatment
would be filling like a RSC approach it is likely the stream would lose flow. Planting the
outer 20 feet for this reach would not be creditable enhancement either. USACE
Comment: I would question whether there would be flow if the bed was raised with
restoration. USACE would not release credit if the restored channel was not
jurisdictional. The channel is part of the larger system, and the lower portions of this
reach would benefit from cattle exclusion. I would suggest a lower EII ratio of 5-7.5:1.
• TC5-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT agreed that this is an appropriate approach,but RES
needs to clearly justify the rationale for the enhancement on this reach. DWR Comment:
IRT suggested 7.5:1,would consider 5:1 if justified in mit plan. WRC Comment: RES
will need to address the issue of cattle accessing land via passage under the bridge and
the associated erosion. USACE Comment: USACE and DWR agreed that 7.5:1 would be
more appropriate,unless 5:1 can be justified.

Scout Site- 10/18/17
The Scout Site is located just upstream of the lower portion of the recently contracted DMS
Mockingbird Site. While each project could be developed independently of the other, the
combined easements will result in a better project and most importantly provide the opportunity
to add over 2,000 linear feet of priority I restoration and limit the amount of priority II
restoration on the Mockingbird Site. IRT members agreed the Scout site is acceptable for
compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation
Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• HC3: Group agreed that restoration at 1:1 ratio is the best approach for this reach and
including it will improve the development of the Mockingbird project. USACE
commented that a hunting blind within the proposed easement area will need to be
removed. There is an existing crossing that will be removed as part of the design. RES
also showed a tributary that was not included in the prospectus that would be eligible for
potential restoration credit at the tie-in with HC3, but would more likely be Enhancement
II for the rest of the reach.

I IV Pli
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office .
Ramona M.liartos,Administrator ,
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and I Iistoty
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
November 7, 2017
Daniel Ingram
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, #110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Re: RES Yadkin 01 Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank, ER 17-1991
Dear Mr. Ingram:
Thank you for your letter of July 7, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
2916.c.S6SEctatt
ORamona M. Bartos
Location:109 Fast Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

Memorandum to the Record
October 6, 2017
Response to Public Notice and agency comments on the Prospectus to establish
the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW-2017-01462) in the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101, North Carolina.
Andrea,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback and comments on the Public Notice (SAW-
2017-01462) for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) Prospectus. The bank
Sponsor, Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC wishes to establish a commercial umbrella
mitigation bank to generate mitigation banking credits to provide compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources associated with Section 404 permits within the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101.The Bank consists of establishing five mitigation sites
expected to provide approximately 6,373 cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) and 11,764 warm
SMUs by restoring, enhancing and preserving over 29,800 linear feet of stream and riparian
corridor. The project is designed to address stressors identified in the watershed and provide
improvements and ecological uplift to water quality, hydrologic function and both aquatic and
terrestrial habitat.
The EPA Region 4 Ocean, Wetlands and Stream Protection Branch offers the following
comments as they pertain to RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Final Prospectus dated
July, 2017 and the Public Notice dated September 6, 2017.
• Section 1.4/Page 3: The project goals stated are too broad and somewhat vague. For
example, the goal: "Nutrient removal" and a few others may be better presented as
"Intercept, filter, minimize and potentially eliminate nutrients (such as...), sediment and
other pollutants/pathogens before entering the aquatic environment".
o The goal of"Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat" is also vague and does not
address any particular habitat or species of interest. Since we have cool water
habitats being presented for restoration/enhancement then the goals should
address the habitat types and rationale for considering them.
o "Invasive species treatment" is more of an objective or action (and is stated as
such in the document) to address the real goal of"Eliminate competition to
native vegetation from exotic and invasive floral species".
o I understand that many of the "goals" presented are at the prospectus level and
not necessarily applicable to each site but without clear goals, the establishment

of objectives and performance standards that relate back to the goals and
functional uplift of the site becomes more challenging.
• Section 3.7/Page 6:The last sentence should read: "If planted tree mortality affects 40
percent or greater of the initial planting in a stream or wetland restoration or
enhancement area, then a remedial/supplemental planting plan will be implemented
for the affected area(s)." This addresses "planted" vs. "volunteer" mortality and defines
the starting point to consider mortality.
• Section 5.1/Page 9: Be sure to continue coordinating the work at the Gideon Site with
the Little Sebastian sites and ensure the Mitigation Plan is updated with relevant
information about the adjacent restoration site. NCDMS' Little Sebastian site is now out
on Public Notice, SAW-2017-01507, dated September 21, 2017. The Mitigation Plan
should address how the Gideon Site will tie in with the adjacent restoration work so that
the projects connect seamlessly and minimize disturbance to one another.
• Section 5.4.7/Page 13: Be sure to identify the adjacent restoration work at the Little
Sebastian site upstream and downstream of the project as a potential constraint. See
comment above.
• Section 5.5/Page 14: Table 6 does not match Figure 8. Be sure not to carry error forward
into the Mitigation Plan for Gideon Site.
• Section 5.5.1/Page 14: Second paragraph should state Enhancement Level II instead of
Level I. I also recommend 50-foot riparian buffers be considered for this site due to the
high potential for nutrients and fecal pathogens to enter the stream from the adjacent
pasture.
• Section 7.1/Page 21: SMU discrepancy should be corrected to match Table 6 on page 26.
• Section 7.4.2/Page 22: Information on FF-5 is missing.
• Section 7.5.1/Page 26: Enhancement Level I is not being utilized at the Green Mesa Site.
Level II is proposed for Reach FF3-A.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 34: Priority Level I is proposed for TC3-B only. Be sure to note pond
removals in this paragraph and restoration plan in general.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 35: Enhancement Level II includes TC3-A also.
• Section 9.1/Page 36: Recommend continuing to coordinate with NCDMS and the
adjacent Mockingbird site currently out on Public Notice (SAW-2017-01505) dated
September 15, 2017.The Mockingbird site is considering a Priority II approach to
restoration along Hauser Creek at the terminus of the Scout Site which is considering
Priority I approach on Hauser Creek (HC3). I agree that the sites can be developed
independently but they should complement each other and provide for a seamless
transition as one moves downstream from Scout to Mockingbird.
• Section 9.4.7/Page 39: See comment above.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback, comments and concerns with the RES
Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus and associated proposed sites to provide
compensatory mitigation in the Upper Yadkin River watershed of North Carolina. I believe the
sponsor has provided a viable plan to offset warm and cool water stream impacts that will be
incurred within the proposed service area. If you or the sponsor have any questions or need
clarification on any of the comments stated above, please contact me at 404-562-9225 or at
[e-mail].
Best Regards,
Todd Bowers
Comments submitted to Andrea Hughes (SAW-PM) via email on October 6, 2017.

tip
,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
June 28,2018
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,NC 27605
Re: Identification of Stone Wall Features, Green Mesa Mitigation Site,RES Yadkin 01 Stream and
Wetland Umbrella Bank,Yadkin County,ER 17-1991
Dear Ms. Conder:
Thank you for your submission concerning the above referenced project.We have reviewed the information
provided and offer the following comments.
Two dry-stacked stone wall features were identified in the Area of Potential Effects for the proposed Green
Mesa mitigation site. Thank you for bringing these features to our attention. They have been recorded with
the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology as archaeological sites 31YD224 (Reach FF1-A) and
31YD225 (Reach FF1-C).No earthwork or heavy equipment are planned in the immediate vicinity of either
site. Based on the information provided, the proposed mitigation activities will have no effect on any historic
properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
C-12,ksuL tculle- .
Ramona M. Bartos
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
r es
Raleigh, NC 27605
o
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd.Suite 650
Houston,TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
June 12,2018
Renee Gledhill-Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-4617
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
The Green Mesa Site has been identified by Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC(RES)to provide
compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream impacts.The proposed project involves the restoration,
enhancement,and preservation of approximately 8,350 linear feet of stream. The prospectus for the RES
Yadkin 01 Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank was submitted to the NC Interagency Review(IRT)Team
in July 2017.As part of that process SHPO responded on November 7,2017 that a review of the project
has been conducted and are not aware of any historic resources which would be affected by the project
(Tracking#ER17-1991).
The five sites under the proposed RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank had IRT site visits October 16-18,
2017. During the site visit it was noted that the Green Mesa Site has two stone walls that would need
further coordination with SHPO. One stone wall is located on Reach FF1-C(north of the pond)and this
entire wall is intact and has a culvert. It was noted during the site visit to possibly retrofit this culvert,but
the IRT and RES agreed to leave the culvert in place and adjust the credit ratio.The mitigation treatment
on this reach is Enhancement II and would involve cattle exclusion and riparian buffer planting. There
will not be any earthwork or equipment in this area.
The other stone wall is remnants of a stone wall on Reach FF1-A(reach to the farthest west).The
mitigation treatment on this reach is also Enhancement II with an approach of cattle exclusion and
riparian buffer planting. There will not be any earthwork or equipment in this area.
These two areas are called out on the attached map and photos of both areas are included in this letter. If
you would like the regular size photo for any of these please let me know.
The landowners have lived on the property for four generations. The current landowner,Arlene Frazier
said her great grandfather(Duke Frazier)helped build the lower dam crossing with paid laborers on
Reach FF1-C. It was built as a creek crossing and the driveway crossed it until the USACE dam was built.
The current landowners do not have any information about the dam/stone wall remnants on Reach FF1-A.
Thank you,
Cara Conder
RES
919-209-1052
res.us

w
k,'
,-,-„,. .,
, (,-
..
ik,, ,
, ..„ . , , L a, ,c'° , g .4 ', i N w ram` 4
111k
4. am , -''' ',
•
.„,k,\-:.,, -,,,,,„ „...,,, ,...,„,,,
„,
.,,,,,,, „7,
, ,.•., „., ,
,„,,„4....„. „ ---7-- ---4... , , ,,,,_,..,-... ,.., ,,
......, ,
•
Historic Crossin , ,gPp ��
-
Inset A �� , ,,
.1
ti
Relic Wall �; ,
Inset B _.:
"
iiii
V
4
/
� ►
5.,�. �, .
Legend f' �
Proposed Easement
,
Project Streams
5. N
Existing Conditions Date: 6/12/2018
�� E
1.....1 W+
«�'-��w�C� g Drawn by: MDE
N +`�~~`�►:r ;�,��'�� 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
y V4'a#` 0 250 500 Checked by: uuu
Il
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet
Feet

/ W,....6 I_
I 1
i .IP
' . ti • .
19' ' ' i
A.
k .
'LI;ll• v{i
wr
1
'IL4.. -
11 kalik, • ,
R $
i
. ti'
r4.
t
Historic Crossing l '�!• 'ks ,M , % 1, , A,...,.. y ' - '. '•
' ►►• s1 • ,
1r1 10
. • \ :
k.
'. .M • •
• '.
•
-,..,s,. ,,,,- •._i_
. . - .:
. . ,. ., , ,,,,, L, -.--._. • . ...„, --- - I
, . At..,. • -...• .... T.: -.'7:). • .„.. . . - ... .....
....,...... .
-. :,,,n,• :,, -. ..., ,.- vc -4t;
...0(°' ''''70X • II- lb
f ,
-: 'r
Legend \
l�
Proposed Easement `
Project Streams -- •
y-" j, -.... .,
N
Existing Conditions-Inset A Date. 6/12/2018
���1►�7���A����;i� Drawn by: MDE
NI W+E
++�rallVi;r ;�1.N. 5 Green Mesa Mitigation Site rs
y ��'�#` 0 25 50 Checked by: xxx
il
Il Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=50 feet
Feet

I i ,t • , .
it, . • • • • 2-. .' •
-:.'s , ) !.", sic , 141. ' ••• .1. '
' , %* „''
- '. • • ' • ,,, ' 1
,1, 0
, 41 . '41'...)ii,, .41-„,r, '..6., •••••
14\
.4)1:`‘`,k,'41. ..:''il' v •t, ,
.1' • •
• •\k,
, ‘,•.t,"riii .,....ife,‘ .11 ' ' • : 4:, ., .
.--:, ,-- .'t,- •_ 1 ' -.?- • Ito
•
.•t-- ,
., ..•• \' .4' 4... . • -
1
,
. Relic Wall ni , .
s\V"
t '. ' • 411k*. . '
., . . .
, ,,s'A • .
. 4* •
.0 -.• I'
- ... ..1144._*-
\•
k , A ,
.— A ,•A'.\i'A 'k, s-till AL. ' ar$
k '., • .
'. . .,
..__ . .• .NI--fl, *V , I
•••IPP
i. „).. . ,.,,,,i •,
auk, • — , . . • -•k t.1
. '
,-, , , _ , . ..., , -..• .
- .,I,• .' ._...
- 4 ' r ' • ‘ •- • .
,. i . or •
.1
.I
i
i.,.\\
4 4.. \ A,j _.
i
' -.I - .' . • v,-
1,-. ; % •. 7 - . 'ip
' ''- '• ' ..*
-,•- • . •---.--r st . .,,
. ...N. Y ' , . 7 • . - - 'WI
••• t .Iti - \ ., 11.-• .' k••• . . - ' i..:i ''‘ ••••\•— • ‘ii: III
(
. ik. 1 ,........._ ,...
t:' ' •-- , •' '. -• • - t 7, - , - .
,F, .-4. , p , I - .. - . . . - - ' ' •- ' .
- ,
'1 ),
. - A
-.,
Is.;i114.
'• 'r, ' '"N-,,
', . t •
•— ' !ilk.t:\... ...... hr. ,f.:.,t.. , ' , ,. ,
,•'t
I . •
Legend ....• ,-• - -
•\c II .4;. .4c. : ; \ — .1!, ,., •
, , •
, ,„ . , .,
T , . , • --'.
I IProposed Easement
`,T,' 4*s, ), • *, _ ,
i , m
LI Project Streams ...
Li
N
Date: 6/12/2018
-',1- Existing Conditions-Inset B
.: -,oPangrAlq.167$01 W+E
Drawn by: MDE E. _AILADIVIN W44"(40
:I', ir.00.‘&7474111*-411 4v Green Mesa Mitigation Site r, s
..... s
Checked by: xxx
irlit 0 25 50
il
11 Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch=50 feet
Feet

Photos of intact stone wall near Reach FF1-C. Third photo is a close-
up of the wall.
py w
p/
W_ ,� Vy,,- -.1'471 u f
J � f 1,
`.� '. ak. / --`- i' /
`\_ \ ,.: / �/
= " ._ " f ' / E
•
/
�~ •_ — .. —e ,Q" -a.�-� - `.-d'./� \1.
em .
.Q S .4
— L' t—..
•
t I
5
1 a • ii axe x % f t{
'
- \ T., .:'-•- •- •.,,,lr- :.. ....„. . ..
—.— _ p
tia s�A r t / � .=— F dis %e y/ /\.1 - r—..._
•-\,1 1 per^ ^ P - IJ
eth er �"._T lC'.._.. .:-� -+ - f ' E ) -.
- r �1 ( y - d 7F',E?�=
,ye y
•
', -
4
kTM
!R_

y,wo- i ,
•r is. ..� t -
. .. iiitk
•
1 t �
ti
7 ti 1 • s
, ',lip A { 1 1 • r a
6 II T
:i iii :Ni;01#
tliqs
' : -,flizi.
,i\
t., ...If'. '
xrr : -:-
r 1
1.
r
4.
t
..^ 1
n ` r 1
1
11/t_
r 1 • • .1 ,
, , , ) 1 I % I-A 44 4, ,111)1, gg gbh 4'6 . ..• 1
r•
'
s
III 11. r
r •
- �•
•
A.
i'llik
NI:�•
f. • 1 4r1PI.
• I �. ifr +R-w .+
zr
.M1L Iti ti •ti
a It
kfrifii:±;paltradill
diviiii
..ti
' t /

The following photos are of the stone wall remnant on Reach FF1-A.
vl'
y = } �` . �k j a� a jam,
_,.1-. .,---- - ,• toit 4 . .111 ., '
f A ',14 -•�a 1 -R_ �..;1:141:1-:
ir ,-
4.::,. -:: ...
r
•
.
�, ^.� -,.;a : '
Ir d 'e41.i. �yj _ - ..
t ga'94i(a• ' r y T h
„lb
,iett.,,,.., „. ,,__:,0 01,4 , .
_ e�L• `-Y.'-"'�4, 1 III '^ .. i
, ,.,,
..,,,_,, 7, . .
it
41011,
/0
-Y a j.s.A; r a; y.- i' p - r�,e �'.` 'F �
Itio
,i!:,:147"' iebell rea.'' ,;3 "ii fir;i144'.“:' f • .
it
, •
•
#-. . .- _ •- - sue--.+ _. __
s
a.
.. �.a ice s'! k ,.- d 1 .A
1 s.. . t tI ( P
+ .y- .is y"x -.! t , tea.. _ 'r+� ! i

1; r�3
F ° .�4r y r f .. r.
•
le
a•'\ k � '"� ^ 1 :.3 t4 d ,. I es SAS -
, cif r vS q +,1y ,6.
r
j
� Neil,` fiT
s }
� - �
- .sue
y a
x
t

From: DCR-Environmental_Review
To: Cara Conder
Subject: [EXTERNAL]RE: [External]Tracking#FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Date: Tuesday,July 17,2018 2:32:52 PM
Attachments: imaae001.Dnq
ER 17-1991.pdf
Our response is attached. Thank you.
Renee Shearin
Environmental Review Technician, State Historic Preservation Office
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
109 East Jones Street 14603 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Please submit all Environmental Review projects to [e-mail]. Only one project
per email.
Allow at least 30 days for our review. We try hard to complete the reviews in fewer days, but under state
and federal regulations we have a mandatory 30 days.
See http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html for guidelines on submitting projectsfor
environmental review.
Do not send.zip, .tif files, downloads, or links to websites as we are not able to process these types of
items. The message size, including all attachments, should be no larger than 20 megabytes.
From: Cara Conder [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent:Tuesday,July 03, 2018 11:39 AM
To: DCR - Environmental_Review<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Tracking# FR17-1991 Green Mesa
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified.Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to
Hi Renee,
Thank you for the quick response. After our initial review request was sent to SHPO we had a follow-
up site visit with the stream engineer and there is some proposed minor bank stabilization work to
be done on Reach FF1-A to prevent future erosion and instability.The proposed work would involve
grading the banks and there are three proposed spots for this. Page 3 of the attached PDF shows the
zoomed in area on Reach FF1-A(this was in original correspondence).

One area is about 75 feet upstream of the wall on the opposite side of the stream bank(the wall is
on the left bank and the proposed grading is on the right bank). Another spot is about 75
downstream of the wall and we'd be smoothing the banks.The third spot is about 400 feet
downstream of the wall and would involve grading the banks.The stone wall remnants would not be
impacted and no work is proposed immediately in the vicinity of the wall (75 feet away).
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Thank you,
Cara
Cara Conder
Project Manager
RES I res.us
Direct: 919.209.1052 I Mobile: [phone]
From: DCR - Environmental_Review [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday,June 29, 2018 12:10 PM
To: Cara Conder<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [External] Tracking# FR17-1991 Green Mesa
Our response is attached. Thank you.
Renee Shearin
Environmental Review Technician, State Historic Preservation Office
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
109 East Jones Street 14603 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Please submit all Environmental Review projects to [e-mail]. Only one project
per email.
Allow at least 30 days for our review. We try hard to complete the reviews in fewer days, but under state
and federal regulations we have a mandatory 30 days.
See http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html for guidelines on submitting projectsfor
environmental review.
Do not send.zip, .tif files, downloads, or links to websites as we are not able to process these types of
items. The message size, including all attachments, should be no larger than 20 megabytes.

From: Cara Conder [mailto:cconder(Wres.us]
Sent:Tuesday,June 12, 2018 4:01 PM
To: DCR - Environmental_Review<Environmental.Review(Wncdcr.gov>
Cc: Gledhill-earley, Renee <renee.gledhill-earley(Wncdcr.gov>
Subject: [External] Tracking# FR17-1991 Green Mesa
CAUTION: Exte -- --- '- of click links or open attachments unless verified.Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a letter with additional information regarding the Green Mesa mitigation site.
This site is a potential mitigation bank site and has already been reviewed by SHPO as part of the
prospectus process. During an IRT site visit two walls were identified on stream reaches and the IRT
requested further coordination with SHPO.The attached letter, maps, and photos have all the
additional information. If you have any questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Cara
Cara Conder
Project Manager
RES I res.us
Direct: 919.209.1052 I Mobile: [phone]

f
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
July 17,2018
Cara Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh,NC 27605
Re: Stream Bank Grading in Reach FF1-A, Green Mesa Mitigation Site in Yadkin Umbrella Bank,
Yadkin County,ER 17-1991
Dear Ms. Conder:
Thank you for your submission concerning the above referenced project.We have reviewed the information
provided and offer the following comments.
One dry-stacked stone wall feature (31YD224) is located in Reach FF1-A of the subject mitigation site. Based
on the information provided, earthwork will take place 75 feet from 31YD224,but not in the immediate
vicinity of the wall itself. We find this 75-foot distance sufficient to buffer site 31YD224 from disturbance
associated with the proposed stream bank grading. Therefore, the proposed mitigation activities will have no
effect on any historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review@a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
121LisuL cA �.
ifeRamona M. Bartos
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599