WI0400033_W/ Injection Evaluation_20100825

wxnqb0033
ot";Irlvto ENR/pw
cc�Q�N
AUc 25 201(/
April 2010 Groundwater Monitoring
and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility
515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
Groundwater Incident No. 21340
Site Priority Ranking 60/13
August 24, 2010
Prepared For:
Kayser -Roth Corporation
Greensboro, North Carolina
Submitted To:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management - Superfund Section
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Prepared By:
Duncklee & Dunham, P.C.
Cary, North Carolina
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

DUN�C�K�L�E�E�(
& DV1V1Z1" M
August 24, 2010
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & ENGINEERING
511 KEISLER DRIVE - SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
OFFICE: [phone]
W W W.DUNCKLEEDUNHAM.COM
Mr. Kim T. Caulk
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section - East Region Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Reference: April 2010 Groundwater Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
Groundwater Incident Number 21340
Site Priority Ranking 60/D
Dear Mr. Caulk:
On behalf of Kayser -Roth Corporation (Kayser -Roth), Duncklee & Dunham, P.C. (Duncklee & Dunham)
has prepared this April 2010 Groundwater Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report for the above -
referenced site. This report presents a summary of current injection activities and the results from the
sampling event conducted in April 2010. Certification of the report in accordance with the requirements
of the Administrative Agreement (AA) between Kayser -Roth, the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, and Duncklee & Dunham is attached.
Groundwater levels have recovered from the 2007 drought conditions and resaturated the area previously
subjected to potassium permanganate injection. The average rise in water levels from 2007 to 2010 was
just over nine feet. The purple colored water associated with the active permanganate ion was detected in
shallow aquifer wells in the source area, indicating continued distribution of the oxidant and contact with
the dissolved contaminants.
As requested by Kayser -Roth and required by the AA, Duncklee & Dunham is continuing with the
preparation of the Remedial Investigation Plan and conceptual remediation plan to fill data gaps from
assessment and corrective action documents previously submitted to and approved by the DENR Division
of Water Quality, Groundwater Protection Section.
MAILING ADDRESS - POST OFFICE BOX 33366 - RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27636
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS LICENSE C-3559
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD FOR LICENSING OF GEOLOGISTS LICENSE C-261
NC DENR REGISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT NUMBER 00061

Semiannual Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility
August 24, 2010
Page 2 of 2
If there are any questions or you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Dave Duncklee at davendunckleedunham.com or [phone], or Mr. Laval Choiniere of
Kayser -Roth in Greensboro at [phone].
Sincerely,
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P. C.
Bryson D. Trexler, Jr., Ph.D., P.G., R.S.M.
Senior Hydrogeologist ��
Oew,'__�l.' `
David L. Duncklee, P.G., R.S.M.
Senior Hydrogeologist
Attachments
c: Mr. Thomas Slusser- Aquifer Protection Section, UIC Group
Mr. Laval Choiniere — Kayser -Roth Corporation (2)
Ms. Doris H. Osborne —Adjacent Property Owner
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600�DWQ Phase\Reporls\2010 SA Reports\2010 Groundwater Monitoring Report-10100.doc
{j; .� DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

Table of Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Site Background 1
1.2 Corrective Action Plan and Injection Permitting 1
1.3 Summary of Previous Injection Activities 2
2 Injection and Groundwater Monitoring Activities
2.1 Injection Activities
2.2 Groundwater Sampling Methods
3 Sampling Results
3.1 Groundwater Flow Results
3.2 Groundwater Sampling Results
3.2.1 Saprolite Wells Sample Results
3.2.1.1 VOCs
3.2.1.2 Inorganic Data
3.2.1.3 Field Parameters
3.2.2 Bedrock Wells Sample Results
3.2.2.1 VOCs
3.2.2.2 Inorganic Data
3.2.2.3 Field Parameters
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
7
7
7
8
4 Conclusions and Recommendations 8
i i,

Figures
Fi ure Title
1 Site Location Topographic Map
2 Site Plan with Water Injection Locations — September 24-27, 2007
3 Saprolite Unit Groundwater Contour Map — April 2010
4 Bedrock Unit Groundwater Contour Map — April 2010
5 PCE Plume in Saprolite Unit — April 2010
6 PCE Plume in Bedrock Unit — April 2010
7 PCE Plume in Cross Section B-B' - April 2010
Tables
Table Title
1 Historical Groundwater VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data
2 Water Level Recovery from October 2007 to April 2010
3 Summary of Water Level Data — April 2010
4 Field Measured Groundwater Data - April 2010
Appendices
Appendix Title
A April 2010 Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Report
B Field Sampling Forms
C Plots of Select Historical Organic and Inorganic Analytical Results
v

April 2010 Groundwater Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility
515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
1 Introduction
L1 Site Background
The Kayser -Roth Corporation (Kayser -Roth) Asheboro plant facility ("the site") is located at 515 West
Balfour Avenue in Asheboro, North Carolina (see Figure 1). The plant currently manufactures socks and
the property contains one main plant building and several smaller outbuildings located to the south and
southeast of the main plant (see Figure 2). Burlington Industries, Inc. (Burlington) constructed the main
plant building on undeveloped land in 1952 and operated the facility until 1982 when it was acquired by
Kayser -Roth.
In the spring of 1999, environmental site assessment activities detected several chlorinated volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) in groundwater at' concentrations exceeding the North Carolina 2L
groundwater standards. The primary groundwater constituent detected is tetrachloroethene (PCE).
According to plant personnel, PCE was used for weed control along the southern fence line. This usage
was discontinued in the late 1970s. A Comprehensive Site Assessment Report (CSA) dated December 17,
1999, and several subsequent addendum reports were subsequently completed by GaiaTech, Inc.
(GaiaTech) of Atlanta, Georgia.
GaiaTech installed 11 on -site and eight off -site (i.e., off property to the south) saprolite unit wells, and
four on -site Type III bedrock unit (DW) monitoring wells to determine the horizontal and vertical extent
of dissolved VOC impact in groundwater (see Figure 2). Soil assessment activities conducted by
GaiaTech did not indicate the presence of significant residual PCE in the source area unsaturated zone.
Low levels of residual PCE contamination were detected in only one soil boring (the boring for
monitoring well MW-1 Ob) near the, south fence line.
1.2 Corrective Action Plan and Injection Permitting
In late 2001, Duncklee & Dunham, P.C. (Duncklee & Dunham) continued site assessment activities and
prepared a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to address groundwater remediation. The CAP, submitted to
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) in February 2002,
outlined a plan to address the dissolved PCE plume through in -situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) via
injection of potassium permanganate. Following the installation of an additional monitoring well as
requested by DENR, a CAP Addendum was submitted to the DENR — Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on November 25, 2002.
Site assessment activities to support the CAP included further assessment in the reported source area (i.e.,
the southern fence line area). Soil samples were collected from several borings advanced along the
southern fence line near well MW-10b and revealed low levels of PCE in one soil sample. This result
supported the previous finding that residual soil PCE contamination along the southern fence line
appeared to be minor and isolated.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 2 of 9
An injection pilot test was proposed in the CAP to determine the most practical and cost-effective method'
of oxidant delivery and to estimate overall groundwater treatment time. Duncklee- & Dunham submitted
an Application for Permit to Construct and/or Use a Class 51 Injection Well to the DWQ, Aquifer
Protection Section (APS) - Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program in late October 2002. An
injection permit was issued to Kayser -Roth by DWQ on January 7, 2003.
Duncklee & Dunham requested an amendment to the injection permit in correspondence dated September
27, 2004. DWQ amended the permit in early 2005 to allow the injection of permanganate slurry in the
suspected source area. The injection permit was renewed and approved without modification on August
1, 2007, by the UIC Program.
1.3 Summary of Previous Injection Activities
Phase I injection pilot test activities, performed on July 14-16, 2003, and Phase II injection pilot test
activities, performed between September 16-19 and 22-25, 2003, were used to ascertain an effective
delivery method and evaluate the performance of the oxidant. Effectiveness monitoring tasks performed
during Phase I and Phase II showed the 1 to 2.5% potassium permanganate solution injected significantly
reduced VOC levels in both the shallow and deep aquifer zones.
However, after a period of approximately six months subsequent to the Phase II injection, VOC
concentrations in saprolite wells near the source area rebounded to pre -injection levels. Contamination
rebound in the shallow aquifer zone was attributed to dissolution of residual contaminants remaining in
the source area. The 1 to 2.5% potassium permanganate solution, while highly effective in the dissolved
VOC area of the groundwater plume, was not able to overcome the residual VOC levels in the source
area.
Phase III injection was conducted on March 15-17, 2005 and involved injection of a 3040 35 percent
potassium permanganate slurry into the source area in the vicinity of MW-10b (see Figure 3). Prior to
Phase III injection event, Duncklee & Dunham requested the UIC Program amend the injection permit for
the use of potassium permanganate slurry.
In February 2007, Duncklee & Dunham requested that the injection permit be renewed to facilitate water
injection in to the aquifer. The purpose of the injection was to improve distribution and contact of
residual potassium permanganate with the aquifer by moving the slurry farther away from•the injection
zone. The UIC Program approved the injection permit renewal as documented in a letter dated August 1,
2007.
On September 24-28, 2007, water was injected into boreholes within the source area near the Phase III
injection wells. The Phase IV water injection was performed at nine soil boring points (Pt-1 to Pt-3 and
Pt-5 to Pt-10, see Figure 2). Each point was advanced with a direct push rig using two inch rods. Borings
were advanced to approximately 30 feet below land surface (ft bls), with the exception of Pt-3 and Pt-8
which were advanced to refusal at 22 ft bls and 28 ft b1s, respectively.
During the Phase IV injection event, City of Asheboro municipal water was injected into the potassium
permanganate slurry in the shallow saprolite portion of the aquifer through the mjection' points at
pressures ranging from approximately 150 to 200 pounds per square inch (psi) at a. rate of four to ten
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.
J

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 3 of 9
gallons per minute (gpm). Approximately 5,969 gallons of water was injected in to the shallow saprolite
aquifer unit.
Following the water injection, groundwater monitoring was performed on October 8 and 9, 2007. This
was the sixth monitoring event performed following the Phase III injection event. PCE remained the
primary groundwater constituent present in saprolite and bedrock aquifer unit wells (see Table 1).
2 Injection and Groundwater Monitoring Activities
2.1 Injection Activities
No new injection activities have occurred since the September 2007 injection of clean water into the nine
soil boring points (Pt-1 to Pt-3 and Pt-5 to Pt-10). The groundwater table was at a low in September 2007
due to drought conditions which extended into 2008. Since the drought, the groundwater has risen about
9.15 feet as measured in April 2010 and compared to October 2007 water levels (see Table 2). This water
level rise has effectively acted like a water injection event as the rising water flushed the permanganate
ions from the slurry remaining in the capillary fringe zone and out through the plume. The presence of
purple colored water noted in several monitoring wells during the April 2010 sampling event (described
- below) indicates the permanganate ion is active and the oxidant remains in the source area.
2.2 Groundwater Sampling Methods
Physical and geochemical parameters were collected from saprolite monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3,
MW-6b, MW-7, MW-8, MW-10b, MW-11, MW-13, MW-17, MW-20, MW-21, MW-22, and bedrock
wells DW-1 through DW-5. Prior to sample collection, water levels were collected in all wells, with the
exception of MW-2b and MW-14 (see Table 3), which was inaccessible for this event (April 13-14,
2010). Monitoring wells MW-15, MW-16, and MW-18 were dry during this sampling event. On May
20, 2010, access was obtained to MW-2b for water level measurement and sampling.
Groundwater samples were collected using EPA -approved low -flow sampling techniques in the selected
saprolite and bedrock monitoring wells located immediately adjacent to and within the core groundwater
plume. A low -flow electric submersible pump equipped with new, disposable polyethylene tubing was
used to purge the well and withdraw each sample. The groundwater samples were collected in
laboratory -provided bottles immediately after purging.
- The sample bottles were labeled and logged on to a chain -of -custody form, and transported to Pace
Analytical Services (Pace) in Huntersville, North Carolina in an ice filled cooler (MW-2b sample was .
submitted to Environmental Science Corporation in Lebanon, TN). Groundwater samples were analyzed
for PCE, TCE, cis- and trans-1,2 dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride using EPA Method 8260B (MW-2b
was analyzed for the full 8260B scan). Saprolite and bedrock monitoring wells located within and
immediately adjacent to the core of the groundwater plume were also sampled for manganese and
chromium according to Method 200.7 MET ICP, and chloride according to Method 4500. Copies of the
laboratory analytical report and chain -of -custody forms are included in Appendix A.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 4 of 9
During the groundwater sampling process, field geochemical parameters were collected from select
monitoring wells. The field parameters included pH, electrical conductivity, oxygen reduction potential
(ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature. Additionally, a field colorimeter instrument was used
during mg the recent samplmg event to evaluate potassium permanganate concentrations in select wells. This
field data is summarized in Table 4 and the field sampling forms are included in Appendix B.
3 . Sampling Results
3.1 Groundwater Flow Results
Water levels measured (see Table 3) on April 13, 2010, were used to create a groundwater contour map
for the saprolite (Figure 3) and bedrock units (Figure 4). During this monitoring event, groundwater flow
in the saprolite aquifer was found to be to the south-southeast at an average horizontal hydraulic gradient
calculated to be approximately 0.032 ft/ft. Based on the data collected from this sampling event, the flow
direction and gradient is consistent with historical data results.
Similar to previous results, this event revealed the presence of a divergent groundwater flow direction to
the south-southwest and east across the site. This flow pattern, observed in the shallow aquifer (see
-- Figure 3), is believed to be influenced by remnant bedrock fracture patterns in the saprolite and partially
weathered rock. This divergent flow pattern is also evidenced by the shape of the dissolved PCE plume
in the saprolite aquifer unit.
Groundwater flow in the bedrock aquifer unit (see Figure 4) is primarily to the east-southeast in response
to an average horizontal hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.038 ft/ft. The flow direction and hydraulic
gradient data is consistent with previous data.
3.2 Groundwater Sampling Results
PCE remains the primary groundwater constituent present in saprolite and bedrock aquifer unit wells (see
Table 1). Recent PCE results found in the saprolite and bedrock aquifer unit wells collected during the
April and May 2010 sampling event have been contoured and shown in cross section and plan view on
Figures 5, 6, and 7. Inorganic metals and field geochemical data results are also included in Tables 1 and
4, respectively. Plots of selected analytical parameters are also shown in Appendix C.
3.2.1 Saprolite Wells Results
3.2.1.1 VOCs
During this event, VOCs were detected at various concentrations in MW-2b, MW-3, MW-6b, MW-13,
MW-17, and MW-21. A summary of historical (i.e., pre -injection, Phase I and II pilot test, slurry
injection, and post water injection phases) and recent data results are shown in Table 1. Field parameter
data from this event are summarized on Table 4. Trend graphs for select wells are included in
Appendix C.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph, County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 5 of 9
Based on this data, the following observations are made:
• The highest concentration of PCE occurred in MW-17 at 5,740 micrograms per liter (µg/L). The
remaining saprolite wells showed detectable PCE concentrations above the 2L groundwater
standards at levels ranging from 4.3 µg/L in MW-6b to 637 µg/L in MW-3.
• The PCE historically detected in MW-8 since September 1999 was not detected for the first time
during the April 2010 sampling event. Field observations and data indicate the permanganate
solution has extended to MW-8. MW-8 showed over a ten fold increase in dissolved manganese
thought to be caused by the migration of oxidation degradation products to the well and the rise in
groundwater levels since the end of the 2007 to 2008 drought. .
• MW-2b had last been sampled from 1999 through 2001 and had PCE at 3, 9.1, 6, and 7.8 µg/L
and chloroform at 41, 24, 24, and 23 µg/L. On May 20, 2010, PCE was detected at 14 µg/L while
chloroform was not.detected.
• No TCE was detected in the saprolite wells. No other target VOCs were detected above the
laboratory detection or 2L groundwater standards.
• . Monitoring wells MW-1, MW-7, MW-8, MW-10b, MW-11, MW-20, and MW-22 showed PCE
below laboratory detection limits.
• Based on pre -injection and post injection PCE data trends, PCE appears to be decreasing in the
saprolite wells following the injection work phases with the exception of MW-17 (see Appendix
C and Table 1).
3.2.1.2 Inorganic Data
Chloride, manganese, and chromium are typical byproducts of the oxidation process, and so are used to
evaluate PCE degradation and as a tracer to evaluate the distribution and impact of the oxidant to the
aquifer. These results are summarized in Table 1 and the following observations can be made at this
time:
• Manganese levels were elevated in saprolite wells closest to the injection zone. Data collected in
wells MW-8 (13.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L)), MW-10b (187 mg/L), and MW-6b (9.59 mg/L)
showed manganese at concentrations higher than peripheral wells MW-17 (1.37 mg/L and MW-
13 (1.56 mg/L) and downgradient wells MW-21 (3.45 mg/L) and MW-3 (1.63 mg/L). All the
manganese levels were higher than the 50 µg/L 2L standard.
• Based on pre -injection and post injection manganese data trends, manganese appears to have
increased somewhat after each injection event in the saprolite wells. Higher concentrations of
manganese have also been noted (see Appendix C) after the the drought period ended and
groundwater levels rose (see Tables 1 and 2).
• No chloride concentrations could be detected in source area wells MW-8 and MW-1 Ob because of
the high permanganate concentration. Chloride levels from the remaining saprolite wells ranged
from 3.49 mg/L in MW-11 to 152 in MW-6b. None of the chloride concentrations exceeded the
250 mg/L 2L standard.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 6 of 9
• Chromium levels showed a similar pattern to manganese levels. Data collected from saprolite
J wells closest to the injection zone showed chromium slightly higher than wells located on the
_ periphery or hydraulically downgradient. No chromium concentrations could be detected in
source area wells MW-8 and MW-IOb because of the high permanganate concentration. MW-17
contained chromium at 0.0109 mg/L and- MW-6b contained chromium at 0.0064 mg/L.
Peripheral well MW-13, in addition to downgradient wells MW-21 and MW-3, showed
chromium levels below laboratory detection limits. The chromium level in MW-17 was slightly
higher than the 10 µg/L 2L standard.
• Based on pre -injection and post injection data, no consistant data trends were observed for
chlorides and chromium.
3.2.1.3 Field Parameters
Field parameters collected during the April 2010 sampling event are presented in Table 4. The field
parameters include pH, electrical conductivity, oxygen reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen
(DO), and temperature. Additionally, a colorimeter was used to measure the concentration of potassium
permanganate in impacted wells.
Based on the data collected, the following observations can be made.
• Based on the colorimeter data, detectable levels of permanganate were present in monitoring
wells MW-6b, MW-8, MW-10b, MW-13, and MW-17. MW-8 and MW-10b exhibited by far the
highest concentrations with colorimeter readings of 116.8 mg/L and 143.7 mg/L, respectively.
• DO levels in the wells sampled remained stable when compared to previous data. Elevated DO
levels continue in well MW-8 (9.98 mg/L). The remaining saprolite wells showed DO levels
ranging from 7.64 mg/L in MW-2b to 2.3 mg/L in MW-21.
• Generally, the pH data collected ranged from 4.49 to 5.87. Wells nearest to the source area, MW-
8 and MW-6b, showed pH values of 5.43 and 5.84, respectively. The remaining outlying
saprolite wells contained pH values ranging from 4.49 in MW-2b to 5.87 in MW-17.
• ORP data indicate aerobic conditions in the saprolite wells. Among the saprolite unit wells, MW-
1 Ob showed the highest ORP reading at 834 mV (millivolts) while elevated ORP results were also
noted in MW-8 (604 mV) and MW-17 (684 mV). Data collected in the remaining saprolite wells
showed ORP ranging from 304 mV (MW-21) to 364 mV (MW-2b).
• During this monitoring event, conductivity data fluctuated across the site. The highest
measurements of conductivity were measured in the outlying wells MW-8 (1,130 micro -Siemens
per centimeter (µS/cm)), MW-6b (900 µS/cm), and MW-21 (830 µS/cm). The remaining
saprolite wells showed conductivity ranging from 195 µS/cm (MW-2b) to 200 µS/cm (MW-17).
This data shows no discernible trends.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, 2010
Page 7 of 9
3.2.2 Bedrock Wells Results
3.2.2.1 VOCs
During the April 2010 sampling event, PCE was the primary groundwater constituent detected in the
bedrock wells DW-1, DW-2, DW-3, DW-4, and DW-5. A summary of historical (i.e., pre -injection,
Phase I and II pilot test, slurry injection, and post water injection phases) and recent data results are
shown in Table 1. Field parameter data from this event are summarized on Table 4. Based on this most
recent sampling event for the bedrock wells, the following observations are made:
• Analytical results show PCE continues to be present above 2L groundwater standards. 'DW-2
continues to show the greatest impact of PCE at a concentration of 717 µg/L. In the remaining
bedrock wells, PCE ranged from 576 µg/L (DW-1) to 1.2 µg/L (DW-4).
• Based on pre -injection and post injection PCE data trends, PCE appears to be increasing in the
bedrock wells following the injection work phases (see Appendix Q. The post water injection
data results also show TCE present in the bedrock wells at low to trace levels. TCE ranged from
34.9 µg/L (DW-4) to 10.8 µg/L (DW-5). No other target VOCs were detected above the
laboratory detection limits in the bedrock wells.
• TCE is often considered a daughter product of chlorinated compound degradation. Although
trace amounts of these compounds have been seen in bedrock wells over the course of the
sampling program, the post injection data trend reveal a slight increase when compared to pre -
injection data results for TCE. No other VOC daughter products are present at this time.
• Bedrock wells DW-1 and DW-2 show a correlation between the byproducts of the oxidation
process and PCE concentrations. As manganese and chlorides increase in concentrations, PCE
decreases and vice versa. Manganese concentrations remained relatively low until after the end
of the drought period when groundwater levels rose (see Tables 1 and 2 and Appendix C).
3.2.2.2 Inorganic Data
As stated earlier, chloride, manganese, and chromium are typical byproducts of the oxidation process to
evaluate PCE degradation and are used as a tracer to evaluate the distribution and impact of the oxidant to
the aquifer. These results for the bedrock wells are summarized in Table 1 and the following observations
can be made at this time:
• Manganese levels are significantly elevated in DW-1 (6.75 mg/L), DW-2 (11.2 mg/L), DW-3
(6.71 mg/L), DW-4 (19.1 mg/L), and DW-5 (9.57 mg/L) above concentrations results obtained
during the pre -water injection monitoring event in April 2007 and the post -water injection event
in October 2007. This appears to be a result of the higher water levels in April 2010 compared to
2007. All the manganese levels were higher than the 50 µg/L 2L standard.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August'24, 2010
Page 8 of 9
li, • Among the bedrock wells, chloride concentrations are higher in downgradient wells compared to
wells closer to the source area. DW-1 and DW-4 contain chlorides at concentrations 44.6 mg/L
and 40.2 mg/L. The downgradient wells DW-2, DW-3, and DW-5 contain chlorides at
concentrations ,126 mg/L, 70.8 mg/L and 51.9 mg/L, respectively. None of the chloride
concentrations exceeded the 250 mg/L 2L standard.
• Analytical data collected in the bedrock wells showed chromium levels decreased slightly in
comparison to the October 2007 sampling event in wells DW-1 (0.0073 mg/L) and DW-2
(<0.005 mg/L). Chromium levels increased in wells DW-3 (0.0099 mg/L), DW-4 (0.0712 mg/L),
and DW-5 (0.0211 mg/L). Chromium exceeded the 10 µg/L 2L standard in DW-4 and DW-5.
3.2.2.3 Field Parameters
Field parameters collected in the bedrock wells during the October 2007 sampling event are presented in
Table 4. The field parameters include pH, electrical conductivity, ORP, DO, and temperature.
Additionally, a colorimeter was used to evaluate during the recent sampling period to ascertain the
relative concentration of potassium permanganate in impacted wells. Based on the data collected, the
following observations can be made.
Based on the colorimeter data, detectable levels of potassium permanganate were present in all
five bedrock wells. Upgradient well DW-4 (1.0 mg/L) showed the highest --concentration of
permanganate while downgradient well DW-2 (0.10 mg/L) showed the lowest concentration of
permanganate.
• Data collected in the bedrock wells continue to show aerobic conditions. DO levels ranged from
9.21 mg/L in DW-4 to 0.89 mg/L in DW-5. This data shows no discernible trends.
• ORP levels ranged from 340 mV (DW-2) to 150 mV (DW-3) while conductivity values ranged
from 9990 µS/cm (DW-2 and DW-3) to 565 µS/cm (DW-4). Based on previous ORP and
conductivity readings, no discernable trends can be seen at this time.
4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the recent groundwater -monitoring results and injection data the following conclusions and
recommendations are derived.
Groundwater table elevations have risen significantly since the previous sampling events of the
drought of 2007. Concurrent with the rise of water levels, indicator parameters "such `as
colorimeter readings and manganese levels indicate the impact of the""ermangaate _oxidant
slurry has spread to the south of the source area. Manganese levels were elevated in 'saptolite
wells closest to the injection zone and lower in the peripheral and downgradient wells. The rise
in water levesl from 2007 to 2010 appears to have flushed permanganate from the slurry injection
area as indicated by the increased manganese levels since 2007.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

April 2010 Monitoring and Injection Evaluation Report
Asheboro Sock Facility, 515 West Balfour Avenue
Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina
August 24, ' 2010
Page '9 of 9
• MW-8, located south and downgradient of the treated source area showed over a ten fold increase
in dissolved manganese, a by-product of contaminant oxidation. For the first time, MW-8 also
contained a high level of permanganate oxidant as evidenced by colorimeter measurements.
• Monitoring wells MW-2b, MW-3, MW-6b, MW-13, MW-17, and NM-21 continued to show
PCE impacts at various concentrations. The highest concentration of PCE occurred in MW-17 at
5,740 µg/L. -
• The non -detect result for PCE in saprolite wells MW-8 and MW-10b and the high manganese
concentrations indicate that the permanganate slurry is still an active source of oxidant when the
groundwater level reaches the slurry.
• DW-1 and DW-4, used to evaluate the injection process in and adjacent to the source area, .
indicate PCE levels are slow to degrade. Residual impacts of the injection process are present in
the deep wells as evidenced by increased magnesium concentrations.
• Groundwater in the shallow portion of the aquifer was found to flow towards the south-southeast
and southwest and in the bedrock portion of the aquifer was found to flow towards the south-
southeast. Both sets of groundwater flow data were consistent with previous data collected.
• An additional sampling event is recommended in 2010-2011 to gather long-term data on the
effects of the water injection in distributing the permanganate and the affects the permanganate
slurry has on PCE concentrations and to determine if the permanganate has reached several areas
in the suspected plume that will be investigated under the REC Remedial Investigation Work
Plan.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C.

Wooded Area
XNi'-22 ti
S MW'-12
® Water
NRV_1O Towers
b Estimated Impacted
Source Area NIW-4
9 C
C
Brick • t t DW-4
N1W-13 S P` W-10b
Residential
Home
• t_
Pt 6
NiW-17 �8 • Pt s
MW-6b
Pt 10
Pump
D'IW-21 /House
Brick
Garage NIW-14
El
bIVG'-18
DW-1
Mobile
Homes DW-2
/ 111W-1 S
111tiC'-20,4,_ IvrW-1
DW-5
Trailer Park B'
D1W-19
n
Burn] Road (SR 150))
Wooded
MW-5 ti
STs
Boiler
House
-r- Fence
MW-2b,L
Main
Plant
Building
Electrical Substation
Legend
19
Property Line
DW-3
x--X Fence Line
MW-16 Saprolite Unit Well
® DW-3 Bedrock Unit Well
®--® Cross Section Line
• Pt 10 Water Injection Point
Parking
Lot
0 100' 200'
Graphic Scale: 1" = 100'
0
O
N
N
N
v
�
a.
a�
rn
O
y
G
a UU
O
O
0 OZZO
P
M
o N
;o
o
A Q
CA
3
II
Q
to
Figure
2

Wooded Area
MNV-22
(164.79)
Brick
Residential
Home
173.08)
21
(167.37) & i
1 1 s3 NIW-12
\(183A8)
182
(18'.1�)
Water
It
Towers
Estimated Impacted
(183.04)
Source Area
1l W-4
5
(I79.0.
W-4
181
(180.73)
7
180
-& 9 MW-6b
(179.46)
(179.76)
179
M
(17fS.17�
174.48)
b N`-19
68 (1,.
o �
Burrnil Road (SR 1500
Wooded
DW-1
ASTs
0
O
Boiler
Fence
Main
Plant
Building
114W-2b (7u
(177.73
Electrical Substation
4) 177
7"I®
DW-3
Parking
Lot
---
Property Line
X
Fence Line
Ia XIW-16
Saprolite Unit Well
N DW-3
Bedrock Unit Well
(176.17)
Ground Water Elevation in Feet
�\
Ground Water Contour Line in Feet
Inferred Ground Water Contour Line
—�
Ground Water Flow Direction
(N\1)
Not Measured
Note: The average hydraulic gradient across the site is
0.032 ft/ft based on well pair distances between MW-I I
to MW-13, MW-17 to MW-21, and MW-3 to MW-1,
MW-2b measured May 20, 2010.
0 100, 200'
------, Graphic Scale: 1" = 100'
O
0
N
O
N
�
�
a�
M
O
cd
l~
O
N
y
)�
.
w-
~
�wU
o
O
�.
zO
�
oz$
M
>, o
i
A4
a
ju
in
F

NIW-12
Wooded Area Water
)ViW_1O Towers
Estimated Impacted 6
Source Area MW-4
O
Brick DW-4
Residential
al -13 � -10b 1 so.
NM-22
P-
Home
\3
D
XRV-17
M
F-1
DID'-21
Brick
Garage
MNV-14
Iv1 W -18
Mobile
Homes
/
Dom'-200
DV7-5'
Trailer Park
4D
MW-19
-9 L
Burniil Road (SR 1500)
1170. 1 it
®DW H u
i
MlK -1 MW-1
1„ 1'
171
Wooded
NNW-16
1
Fence
MW-5'
A STs
I-;
MW-2b&
`� ` 177
1 1 6DW-3
174
(17(1.17)
Main
Plant
Building
Electrical Substation
Parking
1AA
Legend
Property Line
X r
Fence Line
0 NIIR'-16
Saprolite Unit Well
® D«-3
Bedrock Unit Well
(}�
Cross Section Line
(176.17)
Ground Water Elevation in Feet
Ground Water Contour Line in Feet
Inferred Ground Water Contour Lin
Ground Water Flow Direction
Note: The average hydraulic gradient across the site is
0.038 ft/ft based on well pair distances between MW-1
to MW-13, MW-17 to MW-21, and MW-3 to MW-1
0 100' 200'
Graphic Scale: V = 100'
O
v
O
�
cri
a�
O
CO
0
°?
c UCjq
w
N
U 0o
0
zz�
O
Ir
y N
C
N ~
�
U
G
'O
a�
33�-i1
Z
to
F i cure
al

AfW-5 B
(NS)
! MVG'-12
(NS)
Wooded Area Water
nIW _11 Towers
Estimated Impacted S (< I )
Source Area
1 (tiS) (9 ASTs
Brick DW-4
Residential 9 MW-10b
Home (5.7) ', (<1) 0
0
(5740) • -8 DG'-6b
(<500) (4.31
NINV-22 iV 1
(16.7)
+ I i 1\1 W-14
arage
titW-18� ltiS1 (037)
tz -1
Boiler
Mobile House
Homes DW-2
AIW-20. N1\YT 5 6
(�I) (1) Y) MW-1
DUX'-5 U ,
Trailer Park
}NIW-19
T1W-16
(DRY)
u 1
Fence
1
'IN1
Burtnil Road (SR 1500
W'ooded
14
I DW-3
Maui
Plant
Building
Electrical Substation
Parking
Lot
J
---
Property Line
X
Fence Line
® X1W-16
Saprolite Unit Well
® DW-3
Bedrock Unit Well
(5740)
PCF Concentration in ppb
('NS)
Not Sampled
■
PCE Concentration 1,000-10,000 ppb
■
PCE Concentration 100-1,000 ppb
PCE Concentration 10-100 ppb
.
PCE Concentration 1-10 ppb
0 100, 200'
Graphic Scale: V = 100'
o
C
ai
0
O
N
a�
�
cti
o
-v
Cz
o
c o
zRO
eC '�
• C o
�, O
yam.,
G,
c�
a
U
c%
W
U
0
3
�-
G
rig
Figure
6i

Wooded Area
MNV-22 &
tz
I.1LC'-5
NIWI-12
Water
MW-11 Towers
Estimated Impacted i 09
Source Area MAX'-4
S ASTs
Brick DW-4
Residential XPX,-139 MW-10b 0-0
Home O
\1
M\W'-17 j O
MW-8 MW-6b
Pump
MW-21 --House
IV Brick N. .,-14
Garage} �e \ 1 \\ -3
MW-18
i DW-I
Boiler
Mobile - House
Homes DW-2
(717
MW-20� MW-1
D
Trailer Park (6.4)
1
4?
NIVV-19
M)X-1G 1
N -9 �� f— Fence
,a ;
Burrnd Road (SR 1500
Wooded
MW
r
Maui
Plant
Building
Electrical Substation
i I
— — — Property Line
DW-3
4)
�x Fence Line
® I\iW-1G Saprolite Unit Well
® DW-3 Bedrock Unit Well
(5740) PCE Concentration in ppb
(NS) Not Sampled
. PCE Concentration 1.000-10,000 ppb
■ PCE Concentration 100-1,000 ppb
® PCE Concentration 10-100 ppb
Parking
■ PCE Concentration 1-10 ppb
Lot
0 100, 200'
Graphic Scale: V = 100'
Cal
p
C"
o�z
�o
z
N
�
�4 V
o
a� Q
a
CU.�
4.• o
pa o
3
2 _
Ll �
Figure

g
w
z �
Q O
U �
W
44 xr Z
r N
z
�1 w >
c�
® L
H
� z
MW1l INIW-10b MW-lOc
210 - Pt t7 PtR Yt9 n�✓S 210
3 DW-I
200 DW-2 MW-1 200
a,
Clay and Silt —
190 Saprolitc to Soft 190
Waethered Rock
> 180 180
a - N
m _
— M
—�-- 170 Q
170 t -
160 -160
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + — — — 11— — Q
t
150 + + + + + + + + + + + + I50
+ + + + + + + + — — — — — o
140 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + Hard Weathered + + + + + + + _ __ 140
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Rock to Fracttred + + + + + +
130 II — 130 �"i-� C
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ►F + + Bedrock + + + + + + + + + + + w
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + U
120 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _ 120 p
Ito-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + `\+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 110 O 0
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . 0 ,� Oc
+ + U � Z N N O
] 00 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +` 'I�- — _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 100 o O
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — I'- -� F_ + + _+ + + + + + + + +
90 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - --� —+_ + — �- —+- -i- —�-- 90 O Q
80 Cn
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +—-—+-——= 80 JX
Wcll Casing Approximate Horizontal Scale 1"=30' k
© Well Screen Vertical Scale as Shown �N
+t+ Hard Waethered Rock to Fractured Bedrock Q-t
Clay and Silt Saprolite to Soft Weathered Rock U ��
� O
n' PCE in ug/L (ppb)
[,;"I TCE in ug/L (ppb) cd
Water Table (4-13-2010)
A C/]
Pt 1 Soil Boring Point
Figure
M PCE Concentration 1,000-10,000 ppb
■ PCE Concentration 100-1,000 ppb
❑ PCE Concentration 10-100 ppb
■ PCE Concentration BDL-10 ppb 0 30' 60' r�
Note: tsoconcentration are dashed where inferred /
Temporary Injection Point (Pt) Advanced on September 28, 2007 Graphic Scale: V = 30'

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-1*
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
Ag/L
cis 1,2-DCE in
AWL
trap 1,2-DCE in
AWL
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
April 9, 1999
<5
<5
5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
July 9, 1999
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 2, 1999
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 14, 2000
<1
<1
2.7
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
<0.5
<0.5
2.4
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
<1
<1
2.1
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
November 27, 2001 1
<1 I
<1
1 3.3
<1
<1
0.12
NA
9.7
July 9, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.14
<0.002
96
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.14
0.0042
94
August 13, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.13
<0.002
110
Phase II Pilot Test
September 29,2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.13
<0.002
90
October 27, 2003
<1
<1
1.2
<1
<1
0.13
<0.002
100
November 24, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.14
<0.002
120
February 16, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.15
<0.002
69
May 27, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.14
<0.002
130
March 3, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.12
<0.002
59
Slu Injection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Au st 9, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.084
<0.010
35
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 10, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
October 11, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 17, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Water Injection
October 23, 2007
<1
<1
3.5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 14, 2010
<1
<1
NA
<1
1
<1
NA
NA
NA
2L Standard
1 0.7
3
70
70
100
MW-2b
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
September 8, 1999
3
<1
41
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
9.1
<1
24
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 6, 2000
6
1 <1
24
<1
I <1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
7.8
1 <0.5
23
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
Well Not Accessible After February 2001
May 20, 2010
14
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.17
<0.01
40
2L Standard
0.7
2.8
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 1 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-3
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
mgtL
Chlorides in
m
April 9, 1999
180
5
5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
July 9, 1999
250
6
<5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 2, 1999
160
10
10
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
440
6.3
4.6
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
270
5.4
3.9
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
1,100
<5
11
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
1 800
<10
<10
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
160 1
7.2
4.3
1 <1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
August 13, 2003
600
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.022
<0.002
7.1
Sem tember 29, 2003
420
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.035
<0.002
8.4
October 27, 2003
670
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.043
<0.002
11
November 24, 2003
540
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.028
<0.002
19
February 16, 2004
1 1100
1 <10
<10
I <10
<10
0.034
1 <0.002
1 14
May 28, 2004
460
<5
<5
<5
<5
0.021
<0.002
29
March 3, 2005
760
1.8
<5
<1
<1
0.053
<0.002
12
Slu Injection
May 23, 2005
690
4.1
<5
<1
<1
0.047
<0.010
13
August 9, 2005
410
6.4
<5
<1
<1
0.019
<0.010
13
December 5, 2005
320
7.1
<5
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
14
April 11, 2006
660
5.2
2
<1
<1
0.0086
<0.002
14
October 11 ,2006
230
6.9
2.6
<1
<1
0.0088
0.011
19.9
April 17, 2007
390
<2
<2
<2
<2
0.078
<0.005
13.8
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
456.0
9.0
5.1
<5
<5
<0.005
<0.005
22.9
,April 14, 2010
637.0
<5
NA
<5
<5
1.630
<0.005
17
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
1 100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 2 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-4*
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
In
September 9, 1999
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 13, 2001
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
November 26, 2001
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
November 21, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 26, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 12, 2006
<1
<1
1.7
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Ocotber 12, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 17, 2007
<1
<1
1.1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ZL Standard
1 0.7
3
70
70
100
MW-6b
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µgfL
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
September 8, 1999
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 13, 2001
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
November 27, 2001
<1
<1
.0.5
<1
<1
<1
0.98
<0.002
48
July 9, 2003
1.2
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.52
<0.002
220
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
1.3
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.45
<0.002
200
August 13, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.44
<0.002
210
Phase II Pilot Test
September 12, 2003
2
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.41
<0.002
180
October 27, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.51
<0.002
220
November 24, 2003
2.8
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.48
<0.002
220
February 16, 2004
2.2
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.58
<0.002
220
May 27, 2004
2.9
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.47
1 <0.002
390
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
1.4
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.370
<0.010
170
December 5, 2005
3.8
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
82
April 11, 2006
10
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.130
<0.002
121
October 11, 2006
5.4
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.210
0.0061
138
April 17, 2007
2.3
<1
<1
<1
<1
1 0.170
1 <0.005
128
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.173
<0.005
92.6
A Pril 14, 2010
4.3
<1
NA
<1
<1
9.59
0.0064
152.0
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 3 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-7*
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
L
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m L
Chromium in
m L
Chlorides in
m L
Jul 12, 1999
<5
7
5
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 2, 1999
<1
10
7
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
<1
4.4
?
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
<0.5
6.4
; . 8
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
<0.5
1.7.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
November 24, 2003
<1
<1
2.3
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 25, 2004
<1
<1
3.3
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<I
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 12, 2006
<1
<1
1.7
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
October 12, 2006
<1
<1
I
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 17, 2007
<1
<I
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
Dn
Dn-
Dry
Dry
Dn
Dn
Dn
Dn•
April 13, 2010
<1
<1
NA
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µ&L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 4 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-8
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg1L
Chloroform in
L
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
September 15, 1999
650
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
510
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
390
<10
<10
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
February 12, 2001
270
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
310
<10
<10
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
650
<1
<1
<I
<1
0.35
NA
240
July 9, 2003
1 410
<1
<I
<1
<1
0.9
<0.002
620
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
8.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.56
0.002
660
August 13, 2003
210
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.61
<0.002
710
Phase II Pilot Test
September 29 2003
170
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.53
<0.002
660
October 27, 2003
190
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
<0.002
680
November 25, 2003
200
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.91
<0.002
850
February 16, 2004
280
<5
<5
<5
<5
1.3
<0.002
660
May 28, 2004
170
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.3
<0.002
1,300
March 3, 2005
200
<1
<5
<1
<1
1.4
<0.002
560
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
120
<1
<5
<1
<1
1.4
<0.010
580
August 9,2005
190
<1
<5
<1
<1
1.4
<0.010
480
December 5, 2005
180
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
530
April 11, 2006
160
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.5
<0.002
548
October 11, 2006
260
6.4
2.9
<2
<2
0.16
<0.005
18.2
April 17, 2007
240
<2
<2
<2
<2
0.98
<0.005
20,100
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
128.0
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.905
0.0073
465.0
,April 14, 2010
<500
<500
NA
<500
<500
13.7
<0.050
NA
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
"Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Pbase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 5 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-10b
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
gg/L
cis 1,2-DCE in
trap 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
mgfL
Chlorides in
m
September 28, 1999
4,300
<50
<50
<50
<50
NA
NA
NA
October 6, 1999
4,000
1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15 2000
8,900
2.5
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
6,300
<100
<100
<100
<100
NA
NA
NA
February 12, 2001
9,000
14
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
7,000
<10
<10
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
July 9, 2003
1 9,700
1.2
<1
<1
I <1 1
0.084 1
0.0059 1
3
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
6,900
<I
<1
<1
<1
0.053
0.0043
2.4
August 13, 2003
9,300
<I
<1
<1
<1
0.046
0.0028
2.9
Phase 1I Pilot Test
September 29, 2003
5,800
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.1
0.01
T2
October 27, 2003
4,400
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.24
0.0042
4.9
November 26, 2003
6,400
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.22
0.0054
4.6
February 16, 2004
8,200
<200
<200
<200
<200
0.41
0.0043
3.8
May 28, 2004
10,000
1 <100
<100
<100
<100
0.26
0.0033
0
March 3, 2005
6,100
1.4
<5
<1
r <1
0.33
<0.010
1.5
Slum Injection
May 23,2005
<100
<100
<500
<100
<100
730
<0.010
<50
August 9, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
23
0.012
<10
December 5, 2005
2.6
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
<10
April 12, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
12
0.045
7.78
October 12, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NS
NS
12.9
April 17, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
270
0.011
42,900
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
,April 14, 2010
<2,000
<2,000
NA
<2,000
<2,000
187
<50
NA
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
'Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Pans per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 6 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-11
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
trap 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
mgfL
Chromium in
m L
Chlorides in
m
October 5, 1999
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 14 2000
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 13, 2001
<0.5
1 <0.5
<0.5
1 <0.5
1 <0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
0.62
<0.5
<0.5
1 <0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase H Pilot Test
November 21, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 26, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
March 3, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.02
<0.010
2.6
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.019
<0.010
2.8
August 9, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.022
<0.010
2.7
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<I
<1
NA
<0.010
2.5
April 12, 2006
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
October 12, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.046
<0.005
4.15
April 17, 2007
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Water Injection
October 23, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
,April 14, 2010
<1
<1
NA
<I
<1
NA
NA
NA
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
MW-13
Sample Date
PCE in µg1L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
AgIL
cis 1,2-DCE in
L
tran 1,2-DCE in
L
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m L
February 15, 2001
24
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
March 1, 2001
17
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 9, 2001
1.8
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
9.2
<1
<1
< I
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase U Pilot Test
November 25, 2003
3.8
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 28, 2004
1.3
<1
<1
<I
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.57
<0.010
2.7
December 5, 2005
14
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
0.011
2.4
April 10, 2006
4
<1
4.1
<1
<1
0.15
0.0026
3.56
October 12, 2006
5.2
<1
5.4
<1
<1
1.2
0.026
4.69
April 13.2007
6.2
<1
6.4
<1
<1
0.19
<0.005
3.49
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
14.7
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.161
<0.005
5.0
April 13.2010
5.7
<1
NA
<1
1
<1
1.56
<0.005
<5
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table I Historical Active Wells 7 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-17
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in.
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,-2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
Februaty 15, 2001
2,500
4.6
1.2
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
March 1, 2001
2,200
6.2
1.4
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 9, 2001
9,600
<100
<100
<1,000
<1,000
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
r 1,200
6.9
1.9
<1
1.5
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
August 13, 2003 13,000 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.026 <0.002 10
-Phase II Pilot Test
September 29, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
12
0.020
14
October 27, 2003
900
<1
2.1
<1
<1
9.6
0.016
16
November 25, 2003
5,200
<1
1.9
<1
<1
2.4
0.019
17
February 16, 2004
1,200
<50
<50
<50
<50
11
0.021
11
May 28, 2004
760
<10
<10
<10
<10
35
0.024
20
March 3, 2005
6,500
8.8
<5
<l
<1
0.14
0.020
5.4
Slurry In'ection:
May 23, 2005
6,300
<20
<100
<20
<20
0.53
0.023
5.2
August 9, 2005
5,800
<20
<100
<20
<20
0.43
0.015
4.9
December 5, 2005
720
<20
<100
<20
<20
NA
<0.010
5.7
April 12, 2006
6,800
<50
<50
<50
<50
0.35
0.019
7.49
October 12, 2006
1,800
<20
<20
<20
<20
1.5
0.019
8.36
April 17, 2007
7,200
<10
<10
<10
<10
0.044
0.015
5.81
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
2,350.0
<50
<10
<10
<10
0.818
0.0162
7.8
,April 14, 2010
5,740.0
<20
NA
<20
<20
1.37
0.0109
7.7
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
MW-20*
Sample -
p
PCE in lt� _
TCE in !�� .
Chloroform in
AWL
cis 1,2-DCE in _
112/L
tran 1,2-DC-E in
AWLm
Manganese in
Chromium`in`
mliiL
Chlorides in
m
November 27, 2001
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
'Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
November 25, 2003
3.2
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 26, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection .
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 12, 2006
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
October 10, 2006
April 17, 2007
1 <1
I <1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Water Injection
October 23, 2007
<1
<1
3.9
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 13, 2010
<1
<1
NA
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
2L Standard , -
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 8 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-21
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
f LAKIL
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
AWLmgtL
Manganese in
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
November 27, 2001
22
<1
2
<1
<1
0.068
0.002
17
July 9, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.03
<0.002
12
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
18
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.017
<0.002
16
August 13, 2003
5.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.04
<0.002
8.4
Phase II Pilot Test
September 29, 2003
21
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.014
<0.002
19
October 27, 2003
30
<1
1.5
<1
<1
0.016
<0.002
19
November 20, 2003
35
<1
1.9
<1
<1
0.0004
<0.002
26
Febmary 16, 2004
30
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.02
<0.002
22
May 25, 2004
26
<1
1.9
<1
<1
0.024
0.024
23
March 3, 2005
23
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.013
<0.010
16
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
24
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.023
<0.010
16
August 9, 2005
24
<1
<5
<1
<1
0.028
<0.010
17
December 5, 2005
35
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
19
April 10, 2006
45
<1
2.6
<1
<1
0.0098
<0.002
22.7
October 10, 2006
28
<1
1 1.5
1 <1
<1
0.034
<0.005
18.3
April 17, 2007
39
<1
1.8
1 <1
<1
0.014
<0.005
19.2
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
9.7
<1
<1
< 1
<1
0.0549
<0.005
11.4
April 13, 2010
16.7
<1
NA
<1
<1
3.45
<0.005
13.3
21, Standard
0.7
3
70
70
1 100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 9 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analvtical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
MW-22'�
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m'
Chlorides in
m
September 20, 2002
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase H Pilot Test
November 20, 2003
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 28, 2004
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry In'ection
May 23, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
December 5, 2005
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 12, 2006
<1
<1
<5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
October 10, 2006
April 17, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Water kiection
October 23, 2007
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
April 13, 2010
<1
<1
NA
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
2L Standard
0.7
3
1 0.19
1 70
1 7
DW-1
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in.µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
trap 1,2-DCE in
:Manganese in
m.
- Chromium in
m
Chlorides in .
m
July 12, 1999
120
10
11
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 8, 1999
210
12
8
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
190
11
9.3
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
240
9.4
8.9
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
310
14
12
<2.5
<2.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
240
12
14
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
11
8.6
4.2
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase lT Pilot: Test
November 24, 2003
<1
<1
6.6
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 27, 2004
540
11
3
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
March 3, 2005
270
<25
<25
<25
<25
0.012
0.017
15
Slurrykiection
May 23, 2005
400
16
<5
<10
<10
<0.010
0.014
14
Au gust 9, 2005
400
15
<5
<1
<1
0.19
0.013
14
December 5, 2005
420
16
<5
<1
<1
NA
0.014
15
A #1 11, 2006
590
16
4.1
<1
<1
3.6
0.012
20.7
October 11, 2006
440
15
3.8
<1
<1
1.2
0.012
22.3
A ril 17, 2007
480
16
<5
<5
<5
0.01
0.01
23.9
Water kiection .
October 10, 2007
729.0
24.6
6.1
<5.0
1 <5.0
0.379
0.0094
23.2
April 14, 2010
576.0
10.9
NA
<5
<5
6.75
0.0073
44.6
2L Standard . -
0.7
3
1 70
1 70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-RothWsheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 10 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
DW-2
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
mg1L
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
July 12, 1999
140
<25
<25
<25
<25
NA
NA
NA
September 8, 1999
190
3
14
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
320
3.3
18
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
410
<10
19
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
February 15 2001
420
<2.5
14
<2.5
<2.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
420
<10
18
<10
<10
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
340
4.5
15
<1
<1
0
NA
85
July 9, 2003
1 350
1 <1
<1
<1
<1
0 1
<0.002 1
130
Phase I Pilot Test
July 30, 2003
250
<I
E5==
<I
<1
0
<0.002
120
August 13, 2003
370
<1
33
1 <I
<1
0
<0.002
130
Phase II Pilot Test
September 29, 2003
<1
<1
1 1
<1
<1
29
0.044
89
October 27, 2003
290
1.5
15
< 1
<1
0.079
0.11
100
November 24, 2003
21
<1
16
<1
<1
9.3
0.12
130
February 16, 2004
81
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
0.18
80
May 27, 2004
550
1.4
10
1 <I
<1
0.016
0.075
160
March 3, 2005
340
1 3.7
15
< I
<1
<0.010
0.031
90
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
390
3.4
14
<10
<10
<0.010
0.022
98
August 9, 2005
330
3.7
11
<1
<1
<0.010
0.021
88
December 5, 2005
390
4.3
11
<1
<1
<0.010
0.021
83
April 11, 2006
710
5.5
12
<1
<1
0.0083
0.017
80.1
October 11, 2006
430
4.6
15
<1
<1
<0.005
0.013
97.0
April 17, 2007
610
<5
15
<5
<5
0.037
0.0089
98.7
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
883.0
5.6
25.2
<5
<5
0.0344
0.0063
120.0
April 14, 2010
717.0
<5
NA
<5
1
<5
11.2
<0.005
126.0
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table I Historical Active Wells 11 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
DW-3
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
trap 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
In
July 12, 1999
38
15
33
<5
<5
NA
NA
NA
September 9, 1999
37
31
34
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 15, 2000
54
37
41
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 8, 2000
47
18
59
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
70
22
86
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
78
18
78
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 27, 2001
51 1
28
43
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Au t 13, 2003 99 <1 39 <1 <1 0 <0.002 61
Phase II Pilot Test
September 29, 2003
90
26
30
<1
<1
0
<0.002
60
October 27, 2003
230
57
55
<1
<1
0
<0.002
65
November 24, 2003
110
26
36
<1
<1
0
<0.002
77
Febniary 16, 2004
100
32
33
<20
<20
0
<0.002
64
May 25, 2004
97
29
32
<1
<1
0
<0.002
140
March 3, 2005
85
27
38
<1
<1
<0.010
<0.010
64
Slur Nection .
May 23, 2005
98
25
29
<10
<10
0.03
<0.010
65
August 9, 2005
76
26
26
<1
<1
<0.010
<0.010
64
December 5, 2005
80
23
28
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
65
April 10, 2006
110
26
35
<1
<1
<0.005
<0.002
71.4
October 10, 2006
97
23
30
1 <1
<1
<0.005
1 <0.005
1 70.5
April 17, 2007
120
24
29
<1
<1
<0.005
<0.005
71.6
Water klection
October 10, 2007
126.0
28.9
33.3
<1
<1
<0.005
<0.005
70.6
April 13, 2010
248.0
11.1
NA
<1
<1
6.71
0.0099
70.8
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg/L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 12 of 13

Table 1. Historical Ground Water VOC and Inorganic Analytical Data for Active Wells, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina
DW-4
Sample Date
PCE in µg1L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m
Chromium in
m
Chlorides in
m
September 9, 1999
<1
39
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
September 14, 2000
<1
44
<1
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
February 15, 2001
<0.5
32
1.2
<0.5
<0.5
NA
NA
NA
May 8, 2001
<1
40
1.5
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
November 28, 2001
<1
29
1.7
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
November 21, 2003
<1
24
2.6
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 26, 2004
<1
25
3.4
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
1.2
24
5.3
<1
<1
0.14
<0.010
13
December 5, 2005
<1
31
<5
<1
<1
NA
0.037
14
April 10, 2006
<1
35
7.4
<1
<1
0.67
0.021
NA
October 10, 2006
<1
37
6.6
<1
<1
0.21
0.0086
22.3
April 17, 2007
<1
37
9.5
<1
<1
0.85
0.028
1 29.2
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
1.1
39.3
9.0
<1
<1
0.436
0.0079
27.6
April 14, 2010
1.2
34.9
NA
<1
<1
19.1
0.0712
40.2
21, Standard
0.7
1 3
70
70
1 100
DW-5
Sample Date
PCE in µg/L
TCE in µg/L
Chloroform in
cis 1,2-DCE in
tran 1,2-DCE in
Manganese in
m L
Chromium in I
m L
Chlorides in
m
November 27, 2001
<1
1.2
11
<1
<1
NA
NA
Phase I Pilot Test
Phase II Pilot Test
November 25, 2003
8.5
8.2
15
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
May 25, 2004
4.5
6.7
17
<1
<1
NA
NA
NA
Slurry Injection
May 23, 2005
4
7.8
16
<1
<1
0.029
<0.010
52
December 5, 2005
2.8
4.0
11
<1
<1
NA
<0.010
37
April 10, 2006
2.4
2.5
15
<1
<1
0.013
<0.002
429
October 10, 2006
2.9
3.6
13
<1
<1
0.014
<0.005
40.4
April 17, 2007
3.0
3.8
13
<1
<1
0.0078
<0.005
47.5
Water Injection
October 10, 2007
2.8
4.0
15.0
<1
<1
<0.005
<0.005
42.3
April 13, 2010
6.4
10.8
NA
<1
<1
9.57
0.0211
51.9
2L Standard
0.7
3
70
70
100
µg/L = Parts per billion or ppb All samples through May 2001 collected by Gaia Tech, Inc.
*Samples Collected through 2007 in Passive Diffusion Bag Samplers NA = Not analyzed
BDL = Below detection limit (laboratory reporting limit unknown)
mg1L = Parts per million, ppm
P:\Kayser-RothWsheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Exce1\Table 1 Historical Active Wells 13 of 13

�00
> >am 00 <;>
13D.
�1 �o= �pi� �1 n � r'i,• � V
ASHEB
(
Tom, r
N S
i 7:4
oo
oft
Source Map: U.S.G.S. Asheboro 7.5-Minute Ouadranzle.
DUNCKLEE & DUNHAM, P.C. Approximate Scale: Title:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS I" — 2000' USGS Topographic Map
511 KEISLER DRIVE - SUITE 102 Figure: Project:
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518 Asheboro Sock Facility
1 Asheboro, North Carolina

Table 2. Water Level Recovery from October 2007 to April 2010, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina.
Well
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft)
Depth to
Water
(ft)
Ground Water
Elevation, October
2007, (ft)
Depth to
Water
(ft)
Ground Water
Elevation April
2010, (ft)
Ground Water
Recovery
(ft)
MW-1
195.69
32.34
163.35
22.93
172.76
9.41
MW-2b
198.78
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
MW-3
199.11
32.45
166.66
22.95
176.16
9.50
MW4
207.50
34.74
172.76
24.46
183.04
10.28
MW-5
200.53
26.11
174.42
15.54
184.99
10.57
MW-6b
205.35
35.02
170.33
25.59
179.76
9.43
MW-7
199.26
30
169.26
21.62
177.64
8.38
MW-8
204.65
34.89
169.76
25.19
179.46
9.70
MW-9
175.17
15.71
159.46
10.66
164.51
5.05
MW-10b
207.61
38.5
169.11
26.88
180.73
11.62
MW-11
205.50
31.78
173.72
23.35
182.15
8.43
MW-12
203.65
30.74
172.91
20.17
183.48
10.57
MW-13
201.51
31.95
169.56
22.48
179.03
9.47
MW-14
199.44
24.78
174.66
24.78
174.66
0.00
MW-15
195.34
24.50
170.84
24.50
170.84
0.00
MW-16
191.42
14.87
176.55
14.87
176.55
0.00
MW-17
200.99
36.71
164.28
27.91
173.08
8.80
MW-18
198.70
31
167.70
20.45
178.25
10.55
MW-19
191.07
25.78
165.29
22.61
168.46
3.17
MW-20
198.53
33.23
165.30
24.05
174.48
9.18
MW-21
189.09
29.06
160.03
21.72
167.37
7.34
MW-22
182.64
25.23
157.41
17.85
164.79
7.38
DW-1
200.54
38.61
161.93
30.45
170.09
8.16
DW-2
196.53
34.56
161.97
26.45
170.08
8.11
DW-3
199.23
31.81
167.42
23.06
176.17
8.75
DW-4
207.83
35.71
172.12
27.00
180.83
8.71
DW-5
197.98
35.28
162.70
26.79
171.19
8.49
Avers a Recovery
in Feet, n = 231
9.15
NM = Well not measured, not accessible
Top -of -casing elevations referenced to arbitrary site datum of 200.00 jeer
Bold = Well dry used depth to well bottom as depth to water.
P:\Kayser-RothWsheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Table 2 Water Levels-2007-2010 Page 1 of 1

Table 3. Water Level Data, April 13, 2010, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina.
Well
Top of Casing
Elevation
ft
Well Depth
Below Grade
ft
Screen Interval
Below Grade
ft
Depth to
Water
11
Ground Water
Elevation
11
MW-1
195.69
45.5
25.5 to 45.5
22.93
172.76
MW-2b
198.78
4-1
24 to 44
21.05
177.73
MW-3
199.11
46.5
26.5 to 46.5
22.95
176.16
MW-4
207.50
52
32 to 52
24.46
183.04
MW-5
200.53
52
32 to 52
15.54
184.99
MW-6b
205.35
46
26 to 46
25.59
179.76
MW-7
199.26
30
20 to 30
21.62
177.64
MW-8
204.65
50
30 to 50
25.19
179.46
MW-9
175.17
15.71
10.71 to 15.71
10.66
164.51
MW-10b
207.61
38.5
18.5 to 38.5
26.88
180.73
MW-11
205.50
42
32 to 42
23.35
182.15
MW-12
203.65
42
32 to 42
20.17
183.48
MW-13
201.51
40.41
20.41 to 40.41
22.48
179.03
MW-14
199.44
24.78
14.78 to 24.78
NM
NM
MW-15
195.34
24.5
14.5 to 24.5
DRY
DRY
MW-16
191.42
14.87
4.87 to 14.87
DRY
DRY
MW-17
200.99
40.9
21.37 to 40.90
27.91
173.08
MW-18
198.70
21
11 to 21
20.45
178.25
MW-19
191.07
25.78
15.78 to 25.78
22.61
168.46
MW-20
198.53
42
32 to 42
24.05
174.48
MW-21
189.09
40
30 to 40
21.72
167.37
MW-22
182.64
37
22 to 37
17.85
164.79
DW-1
200.54
70
60 to 70
30.45
170.09
DW-2
196.53
96
86 to 96
26.45
170.08
DW-3
199.23
87
77 to 87
23.06
176.17
DW-4
207.83
98
83 to 98
27.00
180.83
DW-5
197.98
99
89 to 99
26.79
171.19
NM = Well not measured, not accessible
Top -of -casing elevations referenced to arbitrary site datum of 200.00 feet
P:\Kayser-Roth\Asheboro-02600\DWQ Phase\Excel\Tables 3-4 Water Levels -Field Data April 10

Table 4. Field Measured Ground Water Data, April 2010, Kayser -Roth Facility, Asheboro, North Carolina.
Temperature
(Deg. Celsius)
pH
(Standard Units)
Conductivity
(
ORP
(mV)
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/L)
Colorimeter
(mg/L)
20.9
4.49
364
7.64
NM
MW-2b
195
MW-3
17.6
5.72
223
353
5.63
0.00
MW-613
17.5
5.84
900
362
5.01
0.30
MW-8
18.1
5.43
1,130
604
9.98
116.80
MW-10b
17.7
5.54
620
834
3.09
143.7
MW-13
18.6
5.15
252
331
0.00
0.40
MW-17
16.8
5.87
200
684
4.89
0.30
MW-21
20.3
5.82
830
304
2.30
0.00
DW-I
17.9
6.63
633
325
4.02
0.70
DW-2
19.6
6.45
999
340
4.71
0.10
DW-3
21.0
6.13
999
150
2.72
0.50
DW-4
18.0
6.48
565
320
9.21
1.00
DW-5
19.6
5.93
900
201
0.89
0.30
mg/L = Parts per million or ppm
pS/cm=microseimens per centimeter
ORP = Oxidation Reduction Potential measured in millivolts
Duncklee Dunham Job No. 02600 Page 1 of 1 Tables 34 Water Levels -Field Data April 10

- aC6Ana1j ca10
www.pac0abs.com
r
April 22, 2010
Mr. Bryson Trexler
Duncklee & Dunham
P.O. Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
RE: Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Dear Mr. Trexler:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on April 15, 2010. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and
Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All
Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Renee Spencer
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
� N ACCONOI
_ � n
� z
i
Page 1 of 25

e
aceArlalytica!
Wmpawabs.wm
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Charlotte Certification IDS
9800 Kincey Ave. - Ste 100 Huntersville, NC 28078
West Virginia Certification M 357
Connecticut Certification* PH-0104
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87627
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
Louisiana/LELAP Certification M 04034
New Jersey Certification M NC012
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37706
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
North Carolina Field Services Certification A 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification M 12
Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00784
South Carolina Certification M 990060001
South Carolina Drinking Water Cert. M 990060003
Tennessee Certification #: 04010
Virginia Certification #: 00213
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Asheville Certification IDS
2225 Riverside Dr. Asheville, NC 28804
Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-03578
Connecticut Certification #: PH-0106
South Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 99030002
Louisiana/LELAP Certification #: 03095
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
Tennessee Certification #: 2980
New Jersey Certification #: NC011
Virginia Certification #: 00072
North Carolina Bioassay Certification M 9
West Virginia Certification M 356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37712
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87648
North Carolina Wastewater Certification M 40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
kC H ACCpgO'
d
Page 2 of 25

r�
aeeAnaly of
F www..paceMbs.com
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
r - Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sample: MW-1
Lab ID: 9267497001 Collected: 04/14/10 11:06
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
i
8260 MSV Low Level
I
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:29
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:29
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:29
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:29
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:29
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 13:29
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 13:29
1868-53-7
_ 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
99 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 13:29
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 13:29
2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of PaceAnalytical Services, Inc..
Q M ACCCAP'
�LL1ilOZ
Page 3 of 25

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
�i p-ebr — Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sample: MW-7
Lab ID: 9267497002 Collected: 04/13/10 17:20
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 20:17 156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 20:17 156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 20:17 127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 20:17 79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 20:17 75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 20:17 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 20:17 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
99 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 20:17 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 20:17 2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
CCCgC,
� L�JSI�tl� z
Page 4 of 25

-- acemaocal
www.pecelabscom
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
I
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sample: MW-11
Lab ID: 9267497003 Collected: 04/14/10 10:24
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed . CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 19:53 156-59-2
_ trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 19:53 156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 19:53 127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 19:53 79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND .ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 19:53 75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 19:53 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 19:53 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
99 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 19:53 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 19:53 2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
��`F,Q �N •CCC,y'
uLL�a�as,i
Page 5 of 25

aceAnalytii�aJ®
xww.paC&b&coM
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
r
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078 _
[phone]
L_
f I
Sample: MW-20
Lab ID: 9267497004 Collected: 04/13/10 14:00
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:53
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/1013:63
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04119/1013:53
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:53
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 13:53
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 13:53
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 13:53
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 13:53
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 13:53
2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
M ACCpq�'
ti n
�x
Page 6 of 25

aceAnalytical
r www.pecelebe.com
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Aye. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-22
Lab ID: 9267497005 Collected: 04/13/10 11:48
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:17
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:17
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:17
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:17
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:17
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
96 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 14:17
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 14:17
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 14:17
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 14:17
2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
-- without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
AccoA.
n
�i
Page 7 of 25

aceAnacaJ'
W m!pacelabs.svm
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 I inceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-3
Lab ID: 9267497006 Collected:
04/14/10 14:26
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7 Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Chromium
ND ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35
04/19/10 19:29
7440-47-3
Magnesium
1630 ug/L
100
1
04/16/1012:35
04/19/1019:29
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04119/1018:36
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 18:36
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
637 ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 18:36
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 18:36
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 18:36
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
5
04/19/10 18:36
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
5
04/19/10 18:36
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
5
04/19/10 18:36
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
5
04/19/10 18:36
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride
17.0 mg/L
5.0
1
04/20/10 13:17
16887-00-6
J'Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
4 N ACOOAO�
Page 8 of 25
N

qD
aceAnalytical
- www.paceiabs.com
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-6b
Parameters
Lab ID: 9267497007 Collected: 04/14/10 12:34
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7
Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
6.4 ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 19:32
7440-47-3
Magnesium
9590 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 19:32
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04119/1014:41
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:41
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
4.3 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:41
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:41
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 14:41
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 14:41
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
102 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 14:41
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 14:41
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 14:41
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride 152 mg/L 25.0 5 04/20/10 13:40 16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of 25
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ACCaApt
III iz

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
7
-
Lab ID: 9267497008 Collected: 04/14/10 15:08
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
I�
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7
i
Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
ND ug/L
50.0
10
04/16/10 12:35 04/20/1012:13 7440-47-3 D3
13700 ug/L
1000
10
04/16/10 12:35 04/20/10 12:13 7439-95-4 D3
I
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
500
500
04/1911017:05 156-59-2 D3
ND ug/L
500
500
04/19/10 17:05 156-60-5
ND ug/L
500
500
04119/1017:05 127-18-4
ND ug/L
500
500
04/19/10 17:05 79-01-6
ND ug/L
500
500
04/19/10 17:05 75-01-4
98 %
87-109
500
04/19/10 17:05 460-00-4
101 %
85-115
500
04/19/10 17:05 1868-53-7
102 %
79-120
500
04/19/10 17:05 17060-07-0
100 %
70-120
500
04/19/10 17:05 2037-26-5
aceAnalytical
www.p&Mh2bs.wm
Project: KAYS
Pace Project No.: 926749
Sample: MW-8
Parameters
200.7 MET ICP
Chromium
Magnesium
8260 MSV Low Level
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
.CiJ.�tl�Jz
Page 10 of 25
I.

it
aceAnalytical
www.pece/eftcom
�I
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-10b
Lab ID: 9267497009 Collected: 04/14/10 16:05
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7
Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Chromium
ND ug/L
50.0
10
04/16/1012:35 04/20/10 12:17
7440-47-3 D3
Magnesium
187000 ug/L
1000
10
04/16/10 12:35 04/20/10 12:17
7439-95-4 D3
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
2000
2000
04/1911017:43
156-59-2 D3
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
2000
2000
04/19/10 17:43
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
2000
2000
04/19/10 17:43
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
2000
2000
04/19/10 17:43
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
2000
2000
04/19/10 17:43
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
2000
04/19/10 17:43
460-00-4
Dlbromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
2000
04/19/10 17:43
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
99 %
79-120
2000
04/19/10 17:43
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
2000
04/19/10 17:43
2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
a �H eccogo„
�4 0
Page 11 of 25

ceAnalytical
WWWpaceleWom
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-13
Lab ID: 9267497010 Collected:
04/13/10 15:40
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7 Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Chromium
ND ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/1012:35 04/19/1019:68
7440-47-3
Magnesium
1560 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 19:58
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:05
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:05
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
5.7 ug/L
1.0
1
04119/1015:05
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:05
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:05
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 15:05
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
102 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 15:05
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 15:05
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 15:05
2037-26-5
4600 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride
ND mg/L
5.0
1
04/2011013:18
16887-00-6
r Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
oogD„
Vx
Page 12 of 25

aciamalowe
www.psoelabscom
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-17
Lab ID: 9267497011 Collected:
04/14/10 17:10
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qua]
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
10.9 ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:01
7440-47-3
Magnesium
1370 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:01
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
20.0
20
04/19/10 18:09
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
20.6
20
04/19/10 18:09
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
5740 ug/L
100
100
04/20/10 14:23
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
20.0
20
04/19/10 18:09
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
20.0
20
04/19/10 18:09
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
20
04/19/10 18:09
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
20
04/19/10 18:09
1868-53-7
1,2-Dich]oroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
20
04/19/10 18:09
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
20
04/19/10 18:09
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E_
Chloride
7.7 mg/L
5.0
1
04/20/10 13:18
16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
L-
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
4 V% AGCo,
t
Page 13 of 25

® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
,�aoeMaljftal 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
xwtvp20slabs0DM Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sampler MW-21
Lab ID: 9267497012 Collected:
04/13/10 12:35
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
ND ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:05
7440-47-3
Magnesium
3450 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:05
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:29
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:29
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
16.7 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:29
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:29
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:29
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 15:29
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 15:29
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 15:29
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 15:29
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride
13.3 mg/L
5.0
1
04/20/10 13:18
16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1F' CCCgp'
'1'•1�c
VLL�I� z
Page 14 of 25

aceAnalyical
www.pacetabs.com
IJ
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: DW-1
Lab ID: 9267497013 Collected: 04/14/10 13:48
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7
Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
7.3 ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35
04/19/10 20:08
7440-47-3
Magnesium
6750 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35
04/19/10 20:08
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:03
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:03
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
576 ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:03
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
10.9 ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:03
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:03
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
5
04/19/10 19:03
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
5
04/19/10 19:03
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
5
04/19/10 19:03
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
5
04/19/10 19:03
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride 44.6 mg/L 10.0 2 04120/1013:30 16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
4 M co'.
0
Page 15 of 25

aceAr�alytical
WWW.P80318bscom
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: DW-2
Lab ID: 9267497014 Collected:
04/14/10 11:48
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
ND ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:11
7440-47-3
Magnesium
11200 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35 04/19/10 20:11
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0.
5
04/19/10 19:29
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:29
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
717 ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:29
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:29
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
5
04/19/10 19:29
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
99 %
87-109
5
04/19/10 19:29
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
5
04/19/10 19:29
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
5
04/19/10 19:29
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
5
04/19/10 19:29
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride
126 mg/L
25.0
5
04/20/10 13:40
16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
qo�
� LLJ�A�J z
Page 16 of 25

.7
acemayical
www.pacebbscom
i
i
`J
1
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
l Pace Project No.: 9267497
? Sample: DW 3
i_
Lab ID: 9267497015 Collected:
04/13/10 16:30
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
i
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Chromium
9.9 ug/L
5.0
1
04/16/10 12:35
04/19/10 20:15
7440-47-3
Magnesium
6710 ug/L
100
1
04/16/10 12:35
04/19/10 20:15
7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:53
156-59-2
r trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:53
156-60-5
j Tetrachloroethene
248 ug/L
10.0
10
04/20/10 16:26
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
11.1 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:53
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 15:53
75-01-4
- 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
98 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 15:53
460-00-4
` Dibromofluoromethane (S)
102 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 15:53
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 15:53
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 15:53
2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
- Chloride
70.8 mg/L
10.0
2
04/20/1,0 13:30
16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
n
Quaff
Page 17 of 25

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalW al 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
wwwpacelabs.com Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078 - -
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sample: DW-4
Lab ID: 9267497016 Collected:
04/14/10 09:35
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit'
DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7 Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Chromium
71.2 ug/L
5.0
1
04/20/10'11:35
04/20/1021:04 7440-47-3
Magnesium
19100 ug/L
100
1
04/20/10 11:35
04/20/10 21:04 7439-95-4
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:17 156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:17 156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
1.2 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:17 127-18-4
Trichloroethene
34.9 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:17 79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:17 75-01-4 ,
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 16:17 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 16:17 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
100 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 16:17 17060-07-0
Toluene -dB (S)
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 16:17 2037-26-5
4500 Chloride
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
Chloride
40.2 mg/L
10.0
2
04/20/10 13:30 16887-00-6
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
C CCq'
�x
Page 18 of 25
i

aceAnaly��Cal
-- www.pacelabs.com
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Sample: DW-5
Parameters
200.7 MET ICP
Chromium
Magnesium
i
8260 MSV Low Level
cis'1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
- 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4500 Chloride
Chloride
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 9267497017 Collected:
04/13/10 13:28
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
21.1 ug/L
5.0
1
04/20/10 11:35
04/20/10 21:12
7440-47-3
9570 ug/L
100
1
04/20/10 11:35
04/20/10 21:12
7439-95-4
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:41
156-59-2
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:41
156-60-5
6.4 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:41
127-18-4
10.8 ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 16:41
79-01-6
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04119/1016:41
75-01-4
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 16:41
460-00-4
102 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 16:41
1868-53-7
100 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 16:41
17060-07-0
99 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 16:41
2037-26-5
Analytical Method: SM 4500-CI-E
51.9 mg/L
10.0
2
04/20/10 13:31
16887-00-6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ccoeot
Quaff
Page 19 of 25

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: TRIP BLANK
Lab ID: 9267497018 Collected: 04/14/10 00:00
Received: 04/15/10 16:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV Low Level
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04119/1011:52
156-59-2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 11:52
156-60-5
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 11:52
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 11:52
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
1.0
1
04/19/10 11:52
75-01-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
1
04/19/10 11:52
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
102 %
85-115
1
04/19/10 11:52
1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
98 %
79-120
1
04/19/10 11:52
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
04/19/10 11:52
2037-26-5
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ti N
�x
Page 20 of 25

i
aCeAna[Xical
fwmpeoelebs com
l
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
QC Batch: MPRP/6155 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497008, 9267497009, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013,
I' 9267497014,9267497016 j .
METHOD BLANK: 429678
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples:
9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497008,
9267497009, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013,
9267497014,9267497015
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Chromium
ug/L
ND 5.0
04/19/1018:18
Magnesium
ug/L
ND 100
04/19/1018:18
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 429679
Spike
LCS
LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Chromium
ug/L
500
531
106 85-115
Magnesium
ug/L
5000
5050
101 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 429680
429681
MS
MSD
9267441001
Spike
Spike MS
MSD MS MSD % Rec
Parameter
Units Result
Conc.
Conc. Result
Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD Qual
Chromium
ug/L 7.5
500
500 512
500 101 99 70-130 2
Magnesium
ug/L 471000
5000
5000 494000
479000 462 168 70-130 3 MO
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 429682
Parameter
Chromium
Magnesium
I' -I
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
I
9267255001 Dup
Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
ug/L ND .45J
ug/L 1.7 mg/L 1740 3
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
4 �N ACCpp'
is
Q=
Page 21 of 25

ceAnalytica!'�
www,pacalebs.�om
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
QC Batch: MPRP/6168
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7
Associated Lab Samples: 9267497016, 9267497017
METHOD BLANK: 430675
Associated Lab Samples: 9267497016, 9267497017
Parameter Units
Chromium ug/L
Magnesium ug/L
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Analysis Method: EPA200.7
Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Matrix: Water
Blank Reporting
Result Limit Analyzed
ND 5.0 04/20/10 20:34
ND 100 04/20/10 20:34
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 430676
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Chromium ug/L
500
490
98
85-115
Magnesium ug/L
5000
4840
97
85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 430677
430678
.MS
MSD
9267521001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec % Rec
Limits RPD Qua[
Chromium ug/L ND.
500
500
501
497
100 99
70-130 1
Magnesium ug/L 2.2
5000
5000
7290
7150
101 98
70-130 2
mg/L
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 430679
9267497016 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Chromium ug/L 71.2 69.4 3
Magnesium ug/L 19100 18900 1
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
O
Az
Page 22.of 25

aceAnatydieaf
www.pecambscom
�I
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QC Batch: MSV/10659
Analysis Method: EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260
Analysis Description: 8260 MSV Low Level
Associated Lab Samples:
9267497001, 9267497002, 9267497003, 9267497004, 9267497005, 9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497008,
9267497009, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013, 9267497014, 9267497015, 9267497016,
9267497017,9267497018
METHOD BLANK: 430653
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples:
9267497001, 9267497002, 9267497003, 9267497004, 9267497005, 9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497008,
9267497009, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013, 9267497014, 9267497015, 9267497016,
9267497017,9267497018
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND 1.0 04/19/10 11:27
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND 1.0 04/19/10 11:27
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND 1.0 04/19/10 11:27
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND 1.0 04/19/10 11:27
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND 1.0 04/19/10 11:21
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
99 79-120 04/19/10 11:27
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
98 87-109 04/19/10 11:27
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
100 85-115 04/19/10 11:27
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
100 70-120 04/19/10 11:27
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 430654
Parameter
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
Trichloroethene
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
Spike
Units Conc.
LCS
Result
50
49.0
50
51.2
50
49.8
50
52.2
50
40.4
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
98 76-133
102 78-128
100 78-134
104 79-127
81 67A43
101 79-120
100 87-109
98 85-115
99 70-120
Qualifiers
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 430655
430656
MS
MSD
9267497007 Spike
Spike MS
MSD MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units Result Conc.
Conc. Result
Result % Rec
% Rec
Limits. RPD Qual
Trichloroethene
ug/L ND 50
50 50.5
52.8 101
106
73-131 4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
102
101
79-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
98
98
87-109
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
102
101
85-115
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
100
99
70-120
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
li This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1_
Page 23 of 25

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceMalyticN 2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QC Batch: WETA/7191 Analysis Method: SM 4500-CI-E
QC Batch Method: SM 4500-CI-E Analysis Description: 4500 Chloride
Associated Lab Samples: 9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013, 9267497014, 9267497015,
9267497016,9267497017
METHOD BLANK: 430883 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9267497006, 9267497007, 9267497010, 9267497011, 9267497012, 9267497013, 9267497014, 9267497015,
9267497016,9267497017
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Chloride mg/L ND 5.0 04/20/1013:16
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 430884
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Chloride mg/L 20 21.1 105 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
Parameter
430885
Units
9267435001
Result
Spike MS MS % Rec
Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
51.6
20 69.2 88 75-125
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 430886
9267435003
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
18.4
18.4 0
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Accoti A*�
4LLJ�Jx
Page 24 of 25

r
I
aceAnalytbl
wwwpac&bsoom
I
i
QUALIFIERS
Project: KAYSER-ROTH ASHEBORO 02600
Pace Project No.: 9267497
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
D3 Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non -target analytes or other matrix interference.
Mo Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits.
Date: 04/22/2010 03:00 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 25 of 25
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
4 µ �CCOAO�
c

/ � �PaceAnal ical
ttitwr.pacelabs.csm
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document
The Chain -of -Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Section A Section B Section C Page; j of
Required Client Information: Required Project Information:
Invoice Information:
Company: Report To: AAACIJU Attention: 1336047
Address: Copy To: Company Name:
REGUt:�1tORY AGENCY :..;' ; .
Address:
I_ NPDES GROUND WATER IY DRINKING WATER
E ll To:
Purchase Order No.:
oJyP: Fax:
Project Name:
pare ��
Reference:
r UST I-' RCRA r OTHER
`�
_
O 0
Pace Project
Manager.
Pace Profile #:
Ske Location
Requested Due DatefTAT:
Project Number.
0
-'
.
;''SEAT&:•
stedAnalyt;Is.F*lred
Section D odes
Required Client Information MATTRIXC o
_DE �
3
�
COLLECTED
PleSBNadveS
:
Drinking Water DW
p
Water WT
v
p
Waste Water WW
2
poop
COMPOSITE
START
CAM
END
U
' }
SoiySolid SL
SAMPLE ID oil oL
g
Wipe WP
(AM S /:) Tissue
i su TS
Sample IDS MUST BE UNIQUE � fe TOT
W
U
Lu
a.
w
W.
Z
c
X
w
~
m
a.
a
O
U
a
ro
W
n
a
0
0
=O
o
O
_W
DATE
TIME
DATE
TIME
N
O
3
2
2
Z
Z
Pace Pro eet NoJ Lab I.D.
ll0
3
2-3
14
t
1.
`` x
3
MW
3
3
a
W
31
1ft
b
508"
a
11
113
?c
'
yry
S
to
7
r
rO
B31m�
3
t
g
10
IA% "
2
12 Aw •— 22
111(f
3
1
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISRED BY,'/ AFFILIq) Jp rg
,:,>.:
D T
-�,
$
C��
F AFi
..DATE•
TIME
_w ,.� .,��
„k_,,,,
�„�
'�y
�fi
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
C�s
2 oC
c
lz&to
`:
' J r,r-�
ORIGINAL'►tVs��
m
_
PRINT Name of SAMPLER:
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: DATE Signed
E
~
m 8
U' m
E
(MMIDDIYY): 1
*Important Note: By sinnina this form you are a-antina Pwm
re
y
m
U

2aceAnalyfical'
www.pacelabc.com
Section A
Required Client Information:
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document
The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Section B Section C Page: of Required Project Information: 7—
Company
Report To:
Invoice information:
Attention:
Address:
Copy To:
Company Name:
Address:
E ail To:
Purchase Order No.:
Pam Quote
hone: _n O Fax:
'L
Project Name:
kAk'l
Reference:
PdCe Proted
Requested Due Date/TAT:
a.CA
Project Number:
Manager:
Pace Profile a:
Section D Matrix Codes
—a
Required Client Information MATRIX / CODE
m
g
Z.
COLLECTED
Preservatives
`>
Drinking Water DW
U
U
Water WT
UFDATE
Op
Waste Water WW
Product P
Q
COMU
STW
SoilfSolid SL
C�SAMPLE
ID oil OLg
NWipe
WPFW(A Z, D-9 /:) Air AR
Wa
ZSample
IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS
p
aa_
Other OT
U
IIZhEu
a�0~a
<LDATE
#
S
?
2
Z
Z
O
H�
z
bui -2
s
- 3
to
o
(
l
1336046
REGULATORY AGENCY
F NPDES GROUND WATER F DRINKING WATER
F UST i RCRA F OTHER
Site Location / V
STATE:
Requested Analysis Filtered (YIN)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME
ORIGINAL SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE
PRINT Name of SAMPLER:
SIGNATURE W SAMPLER: DATE Signed
(MM/DD/YY): O
'Important Note: By signing this form you are wcepting Pace's NET 30 day payment terms and agreeing to late charges of 1.5% per month k)r an vo es not paid within 30 days.
II
IPace Project No./ Lab I.D.
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
U
o `
�
B g
U
m
c
c
-
E
.� m
Z
m �.
z
n i✓
m
m
U m
~
(A
N

�.ri « a�ttple..�t�ndition_.
Client Name': Project
Courier: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ UPS ❑ USPS ❑ Client ❑ Commercial 9 Pace Other Ep�
Custody Seal on CoolerfBox Present: ❑ yes Er —no Seals intact: �
❑ yes no
Packing Material: ❑ Bubble Wrap �bble Bags ❑ None ❑Other
Thermometer Used T060 Type of Ice: e Blue None J�Samples on ice,
Cooler Temperature 3 -b Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No N/A Date and In
Temp should be above freezing to 6°C Comments: I
contents:.
Chain of Custody Present:
Chain of Custody Filled Out:
Chain of Custody Relinquished:
Sampler Name & Signature on COC:
Samples Arrived within Hold Time:
Short Hold Time Analysis (<72hr):
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
Sufficient Volume:
Correct Containers Used,-
-Pace Containers Used:
Containers Intact:
Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests
Sample Labels match COC:
-Includes date/time/ID/Analysis Matri)
All containers needing preservation have been checks
I containers needing preservation are found to be in
mpliance with EPA recommendation.
exceptions: VOA, colirorm, TOC, 0&G, VVI-DRO (watt
Samples checked for dechlorination:
Headspace in VOA Vials ( >6mm):
Trip Blank Present:
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present
Pace Trip Blank Lot # (if purchased): N/A
Client Notification/ Resolution:
Person Contacted. -
Comments/ Resolution:
❑N/A
j.
ge�-r--'s—ONo
❑No
❑N!A
2-
❑N/A
3.
EON.
rites
ONo
❑N/A
q.
Des
❑No
❑pf/A
5.
Dyes
LI�'f�lo _ ❑N/A
6,
❑Yes
&No
❑N/A
7,
Dyes
®Qo
❑N/A
$, Lam\
es
ON.
❑No
❑(A
❑ WA
9, —
s
❑No
❑N/A
1.0,
❑Yes
❑N
0%A
s
,7�
N/A
12❑Ye
3 SCW`A
U °I.
oling process has begun
Is of erson examining
k -5-LD
tsky_�_b
❑No
❑N/A
13.
��I`1'Yes
NJYes
❑No
❑N/A
to -q A (evel vnW_d c.)ckQ Llut_. JIo dye
Dyes
❑No
1�1W�(ob Same
Initial when completed
Dyes
❑No
14
Dyes
BNo
❑N/A
15.
ErYes ❑No ❑N/A 16
9Yes ❑No ❑N/A
Date/Time:
Field Data Required? Y / N / N/A
Project Manager Review: qw Date: 4 / 6ho
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR
Certification Office ( i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers)

*ESC
I
Bryson Trexler
Duncklee and Dunham
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
Report Summary
Wednesday May 26, 2010
-Report Number: L460296
Samples Received: 05/21/10
Client Project: 02600
Descri tion: Kayser Roth
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
The analytical results in this report are based upon information supplied
by you, the client, and are for your exclusive use. If you have any
questions regarding this data package, please do not hesitate to call.
Entire Report Reviewed By: ,
JiM4 Hunt ESC Representative
Laboratory Certification Numbers
A2LA - 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA-.I-2327, CT - PH-0197, FL - E87487
GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01, KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016, NC - ENV375/DW21704, ND-.R-140
NJ - TN002,NJ NELAP - TN002, SC - 84004, TN - 2006, VA - 00109, WV - 233
AZ-.0612, MN - 047-999-395, NY - 11742, WI - 998093910, NV - TN000032008A
Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held
by ESC Lab Sciences.
Note: The use of the preparatory EPA Method 3511 is not approved or endorsed by the CA ELAP.
This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from ESC Lab Sciences.
Where applicable, sampling conducted by ESC is performed per guidance provided
in laboratory standard operating procedures: 060302, 060303, and 060304.
Page 1 of 12

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122 -
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
OESC Fax [phone]
L-A•B S•C-I•E-N•C•E•B
Tax I.D. 62-0814289 -
• - . •
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Bryson Trexler May 26,2010
Duncklee and Dunham
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
ESC Sample # L460296-01
Date Received May 21, 2010
Description Kayser Roth
Site ID KAYSER ROTH y
Sample ID MW-2B-0510
Project # 02600
Collected By Matt Flinchum
Collection Date 05/20/10 12:30
Parameter Result Det. Limit Units Method Date Dil.
Chloride 40000 1000 ug/1 9056 05/22/10 1
Chromium BDL 10. ug/l 6010B 05/25/10 1
Manganese 170 10. ug/1 6010B 05/25/10 1
Volatile Organics
Acetone BDL 50. ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Acrolein BDL 50. ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
Acrylonitrile BDL 10. ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Benzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Bromobenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Bromodichloromethane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Bromoform BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260D O5/24/10 1
Bromomethane BDL 5.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
n-Butylbenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
sec-Butylbenzene BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260B O5/24/10 1
tert-Butylbenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Carbon tetrachloride BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Chlorobenzene BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
Chlorodibromomethane BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
Chloroethane BDL 5.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether BDL 50. ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Chloroform BDL 5.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
Chloromethane BDL 2.5 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
2-Chlorotoluene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B O5/24/10 1
4-Chlorotoluene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane BDL 5.0 ug/l 8260B. 05/24/10 1
1,2-Dibromoethane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Dibromomethane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane BDL 5.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,1-Dichloroethane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,2-Dichloroethane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,1-Dichloroethene BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,2-Dichloropropane BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,1-Dichloropropene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
1,3-Dichloropropane BDL .1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BDL 1.0 ug/1 8260B 05/24/10 1
2,2-Dichloropropane BDL 1.0 ug/l 8260B 05/24/10 1
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Det. Limit - Practical Quantitation Limit(PQL)
Page 2 of 12

OESC
L•A•B 5•C-I•E•N•C•E-5
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Bryson Trexler
Duncklee and Dunham
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
Date Received May 21, 2010
Description Kayser Roth
Sample ID MW-2B-0510
Collected By Matt Flinchum
Collection Date 05/20/10 12:30
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
May 26,2010
ESC Sample # L460296-01
Site ID : KAYSER ROTH
Project # 02600
Parameter Result Det. Limit Units Method Date Dil.
Di -isopropyl ether
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Ethylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Isopropylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
p-Isopropyltoluene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
2-Butanone (MEK)
BDL
10.
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Methylene Chloride
BDL
5.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
BDL
10.
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Methyl tert-butyl ether
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Naphthalene
BDL
5.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
n-Propylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Styrene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoro
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Tetrachloroethene
14.
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Toluene
BDL
5.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Trichloroethene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Trichlorofluoromethane
BDL
5.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Vinyl chloride
BDL
1.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Xylenes, Total
BDL
3.0
ug/l
8260B
05/24/10 1
Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-d8
107.
Rec.
8260B
05/24/10 1
Dibromofluoromethane
104.
% Rec.
8260B
05/24/10 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene
108.
% Rec.
8260B
05/24/10 1
BDL - Below Detection Limit
Det. Limit - Practical Quantitation Limit(PQL)
Note:
The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC.
Reported: 05/26/10 12:13 Printed: 05/26/10 13:17
Page 3 of 12

Summary of Remarks For Samples Printed
05/26/10 at 13:17:49
TSR Signing Reports: 350
R4 - Rush: Three Day
TRIP BLANKS = $0; V826OLL14D = $75 w/ V8260; Paperless client Report waters in ug/L and soils
in mg/kg.
Sample: L460296-01 Account: DUNDUNNC Received: 05/21/10 07:20 Due Date: 05/26/10 00:00 RPT Date: 05/26/10 12:13

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet,
TN 37122
[phone]
40ESC
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
L•A•9 S.C.1•E•N•C•E•S
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
Raleigh, NC 27636
May 26, 2010
L460296
Laboratory Blank
Analyte
Result
Units Rec Limit
Batch
Date Analyzed
Chloride
<
1
mg/l
WG479684
05/21/10
19:11
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1-Dichloroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1-Dichloroethene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,1-Dichloropropene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
<
.005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2-Dibromoethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2-Dichloroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,2-Dichloropropane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,3-Dichloropropane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
2,2-Dichloropropane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
2-Butanone (MEK)
<
.01
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
2-Chlorotoluene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
4-Chlorotoluene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
<
.01
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Acetone
<
.05
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Acrolein
<
.05
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Acrylonitrile
<
.01
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Benzene
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Bromobenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Bromodichloromethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Bromoform
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Bromomethane
<
.005
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Carbon tetrachloride
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Chlorobenzene
<
.001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Chlorodibromomethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Chloroethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Chloroform
<
.005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Chloromethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Di -isopropyl ether
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Dibromomethane
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<
.005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Ethylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Isopropylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Methyl tert-butyl ether
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Methylene Chloride
<
.005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
n-Butylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
n-Propylbenzene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
Naphthalene
<
.005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
p-Isopropyltoluene
<
.001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10
10:42
* Performance of this Analyte is
outside of
established criteria.
For additional information, please
see Attachment A 'List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers.'
Page 4 of 12

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet,
TN 37122
[phone]
OESC
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
L•A•B 8•C•I•E•N•C•E•S
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Quality Assurance
Report
Level II
Raleigh, NC 27636
May 26, 2010
L460296
Laboratory Blank
Analyte
Result
Units
Rec
Limit
Batch
Date Analyzed
sec-Butylbenzene
< .001
mg/1
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Styrene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
tert-Butylbenzene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Tetrachloroethene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Toluene
< .005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Trichloroethene
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Trichlorofluoromethane
< .005
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Vinyl chloride
< .001
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Xylenes, Total
< .003
mg/l
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
4-Bromofluorobenzene
% Rec.
107.9
75-128
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Dibromofluoromethane
% Rec.
105.1
79-125
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Toluene-d8
% Rec.
105.1
87-114
WG479972
05/24/10 10:42
Chromium
< .01
mg/l
WG479657
05/25/10 20:25
Manganese
< .01
mg/l
WG479657
05/25/10 20:25
Duplicate
Analyte
Units
Result Duplicate RPD
Limit
Ref Samp Batch
Chloride
mg/l
28.0 28.0
0.712
20
L459332-03
WG479684
Chloride
mg/l
350. 350.
0
20
L459706-06
WG479684
Chromium
mg/1
0 0
0
20
L460051-06
WG479657
Manganese
mg/1
0.900 0.870
3.61
20
L460051-06 WG479657
Laboratory Control Sample
Analyte
Units
Known Val
Result
% Rec
Limit
Batch
Chloride
mg/l
40
40.0
100.
90-110
WG479684
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/1
.025
0.0255
102.
75-134
WG479972
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
mg/1
.025
0.0261
104.
67-137
WG479972
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/l
.025
0.0235
94.1
72-128
WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
mg/l
.025
0.0256
102.
79-123
WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane mg/1
.025
0.0309
124.
51-149
WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethane
mg/l
.025
0.0262
105.
67-133
WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/l
.025
0.0298
119.
60-130
WG479972
1,1-Dichloropropene
mg/l
.025
0.0275
110.
68-132
WG479972
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0259
103.
63-138
WG479972
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
mg/l
.025
0.0253
101.
68-130
WG479972
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0233
93.3
70-127
WG479972
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0273
109.
65-137
WG479972
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0258
103.
72-135
WG479972
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
mg/l
.025
0.0252
101.
55-134
WG479972
1,2-Dibromoethane
mg/l
.025
0.0271
108.
75-126
WG479972
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0258
103.
75-122
WG479972
1,2-Dichloroethane
mg/1
.025
0.0256
102.
63-137
WG479972
1,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
.025
0.0239
95.8
74-122
WG479972
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0266
107.
73-134
WG479972
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0254
102.
73-131
WG479972
1,3-Dichloropropane
mg/l
.025
0.0246
98.2
77-119
WG479972
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0258
103.
70-121
WG479972
2,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
.025
0.0237
94.9
46-151
WG479972
2-Butanone (MEK)
mg/l
.125
0.123
98.5
53-132
WG479972
* Performance of this Analyte
is outside
of established criteria.
For additional information,
please see
Attachment A 'List of Analytes with
QC Qualifiers.'
Page 5 of 12

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
*ESC
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
L•A•B B-C•I-E•N•C-E•S
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Quality Assurance
Report
Level II
Raleigh, NC 27636
May 26,
2010
L460296
Laboratory Control
Sample
Analyte
Units
Known Val
Result
%- Rec
Limit
Batch
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
mg/l
.125
0.136
108.
0-171
WG479972
2-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
.025
0.0249
99.4
74-128
WG479972
4-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
.025
0.0253
101.
74-130
WG479972
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
mg/l
.125
0.134
107.
60-142
WG479972
Acetone
mg/l
.125
0.124
99.3
48-134
WG479972
Acrolein
mg/l
.125
0.0420
33.6
6-182
WG479972
Acrylonitrile
mg/l
.125
0.132
106.
60-140
WG479972
Benzene
mg/l
.025
0.0264
105.
67-126
WG479972
Bromobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0245
97.9
76-123
WG479972
Bromodichloromethane
mg/l
.025
0.0242
96.8
68-133
WG479972
Bromoform
mg/l
.025
0.0224
89.7
60-139
WG479972
Bromomethane
mg/l
.025
0.0332
133.
45-175
WG479972
Carbon tetrachloride
mg/1
.025
0.0280
112.
64-141
WG479972
Chlorobenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0256
102.
77-125
WG479972
Chlorodibromomethane
mg/l
.025
0.0264
106.
73-138
WG479972
Chloroethane
mg/1
.025
0.0218
87.0
49-155
WG479972
Chloroform
mg/l
.025
0.0259
104.
66-126
WG479972
Chloromethane
mg/l
.025
0.0240
96.0
45-152
WG479972
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/1
.025
0.0284
114.
72-128
WG479972
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/l
.025
0.0248
99.4
73-131
WG479972
Di -isopropyl ether
mg/l
.025
0.0262
105.
63-139
WG479972
Dibromomethane
mg/1
.025
0.0271
108.
73-125
WG479972
Dichlorodifluoromethane
mg/l
.025
0.0319
128.
39-189
WG479972
Ethylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0267
107.
76-129
WG479972
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
mg/l
.025
0.0252
101.
67-135
WG479972
Isopropylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0281
113.
73-132
WG479972
Methyl tert-butyl ether
mg/l
.025
0.0268
107.
51-142
WG479972
Methylene Chloride
mg/1
.025
0.0271
108.
64-125
WG479972
n-Butylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0258
103.
63-142
WG479972
n-Propylbenzene
mg/1
.025
0.0253
101.
71-132
WG479972
Naphthalene
mg/1
.025
0.0256
102.
56-145
WG479972
p-Isopropyltoluene
mg/l
.025
0.0273
109.
68-138
WG479972
sec-Butylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0256
103.
70-135
WG479972
Styrene
mg/l
.025
0.0271
109.
78-130
WG479972
tert-Butylbenzene
mg/l
.025
0.0262
105.
72-134
WG479972
Tetrachloroethene
mg/l
.025
0.0263
105.
67-135
WG479972
Toluene
mg/l
.025
0.0263
105.
72-122
WG479972
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/l
.025
0.0279
ill.
67-129
WG479972
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/l
.025
0.0244
97.4
66-137
WG479972
Trichloroethene
mg/l
.025
0.0270
108.
74-126
WG479972
Trichlorofluoromethane
mg/1
.025
0.0246
98.3
54-156
WG479972
Vinyl chloride
mg/1
.025
0.0259
104.
55-153
WG479972
Xylenes, Total
mg/l
.075
0.0794
106.
75-128
WG479972
4-Bromofluorobenzene
105.2
75-128
WG479972
Dibromofluoromethane
104.0
79-125
WG479972
Toluene-d8
104.5
87-114
WG479972
Chromium
mg/1
1.13
1.19
105.
85-115
WG479657
Manganese
mg/l
1.13
1.14
101.
85-115
WG479657
Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Analyte
Units
Result Ref
%Rec
Limit
RPD Limit
Batch
Chloride
mg/l
40.1 40.0
100.
90-110
0.250 20
WG479684
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/l
0.0265 0.0255
106.
75-134
3.71 20
WG479972
1,1,1-Trichloroethene
mg/l
0.0267 0.0261
107.
67-137
2.24 20
WG479972
* Performance of this Analyte
is outside
of established criteria.
For additional information,
please see
Attachment A 'List of Analytes with
QC Qualifiers.,
Page 6 of 12

OESC
I
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
Anal
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
L460296
Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Units Result Ref %Rec
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/l
0.0256
0.0235
102.
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
mg/1
0.0274
0.0256
109.
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
mg/l
0.0308
0.0309
123.
1,1-Dichloroethane
mg/l
0.0260
0.0262
104.
1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/1
0.0295
0.0298
118.
1,1-Dichloropropene
mg/l
0.0277
0.0275
ill.
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0275
0.0259
110.
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
mg/l
0.0279
0.0253
112.
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
mg/1
0.0247
0.0233
99.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0287
0.0273
115.
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
0.0276
0.0258
110.
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
mg/l
0.0272
0.0252
109.
1,2-Dibromoethane
mg/l
0.0287
0.0271
115.
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0264
0.0258
105.
1,2-Dichloroethane
mg/l
0.0272
0.0256
109.
1,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
0.0255
0.0239
102.
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
0.0282
0.0266
113.
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0275
0.0254
110.
1,3-Dichloropropane
mg/l
0.0267
0.0246
107.
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0268
0.0258
107.
2,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
0.0239
0.0237
95.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
mg/l
0.128
0.123
102.
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
mg/l
0.144
0.136
115.
2-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
0.0265
0.0249
106.
4-Chlorotoluene
mg/1
0.0275
0.0253
110.
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
mg/1
0.142
0.134
113.
Acetone
mg/l
0.125
0.124
100.
Acrolein
mg/l
0.0443
0.0420
35.0
Acrylonitrile
mg/l
0.136
0.132
109.
Benzene
mg/l
0.0267
0.0264
107.
Bromobenzene
mg/l
0.0265
0.0245
106.
Bromodichloromethane
mg/l
0.0253
0.0242
101.
Bromoform
mg/1
0.0250
0.0224
100.
Bromomethane
mg/l
0.0340
0.0332
136.
Carbon tetrachloride
mg/l
0.0277
0.0280
ill.
Chlorobenzene
mg/l
0.0274
0.0256
110.
Chlorodibromomethane
mg/l
0.0285
0.0264
114.
Chloroethane
mg/l
0.0218
0.0218
87.0
Chloroform
mg/l
0.0263
0.0259
105.
Chloromethane
mg/1
0.0248
0.0240
99.0
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/1
0.0279
0.0284
112.
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/l
0.0262
0.0248
105.
Di -isopropyl ether
mg/l
0.0271
0.0262
108.
Dibromomethane
mg/l
0.0276
0.0271
110.
Dichlorodifluoromethane
mg/l
0.0321
0.0319
128.
Ethylbenzene
mg/l
0.0281
0.0267
112.
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
mg/l
0.0253
0.0252
101.
Isopropylbenzene
mg/1
0.0297
0.0281
119.
Methyl tert-butyl ether
mg/1
0.0278
0.0268
ill.
Methylene Chloride
mg/1
0.0285
0.0271
114.
n-Butylbenzene
mg/l
0.0264
0.0258
106.
n-Propylbenzene
mg/1
0.0266
0.0253
106.
Naphthalene
mg/l
0.0275
0.0256
110.
p-Isopropyltoluene
mg/l
0.0290
0.0273
116.
sec-Butylbenzene
mg/1
0.0272
0.0256
109.
Styrene
mg/1
0.0290
0.0271
116.
tert-Butylbenzene
mg/l
0.0278
0.0262
ill.
Tetrachloroethene
mg/l
0.0278
0.0263
ill.
Toluene
mg/1
0.0269
0.0263
107.
* Performance of this Analyte
is outside
of established criteria.
For additional information,
please see
Attachment
A 'List
of Analytes
Page 7 of 12
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
May 26, 2010
Limit
RPD
Limit
Batch
72-128
8.34
20
WG479972
79-123
6.68
20
WG479972
51-149
0.420
20
WG479972
67-133
0.710
20
WG479972
60-130
1.17
20
WG479972
68-132
0.860
20
WG479972
63-138
6.12
20
WG479972
68-130
9.74
20
WG479972
70-127
5.80
20
WG479972
65-137
5.08
20
WG479972
72-135
6.99
20
WG479972
55-134
7.61
20
WG479972
75-126
5.83
20
WG479972
75-122
1.99
20
WG479972
63-137
6.08
20
WG479972
74-122
6.14
20
WG479972
73-134
5.58
20
WG479972
73-131
7.66
20
WG479972
77-119
8.19
20
WG479972
70-121
3.82
20
WG479972
46-151
0.540
20
WG479972
53-132
3.65
20
WG479972
0-171
6.21
27
WG479972
74-128
6.56
20
WG479972
74-130
8.22
20
WG479972
60-142
5.48
20
WG479972
48-134
0.880
20
WG479972
6-182
5.45
39
WG479972
60-140
3.40
20
WG479972
67-126
1.38
20
WG479972
76-123
7.86
20
WG479972
68-133
4.32
20
WG479972
60-139
11.1
20
WG479972
45-175
2.27
20
WG479972
64-141
1.06
20
WG479972
77-125
6.88
20
WG479972
73-138
7.64
20
WG479972
49-155
0.0500
20
WG479972
66-126
1.38
20
WG479972
45-152
3.14
20
WG479972
72-128
1.57
20
WG479972
73-131
5.46
20
WG479972
63-139
3.47
20
WG479972
73-125
1.79
20
WG479972
39-189
0.790
24
WG479972
76-129
5.21
20
WG479972
67-135
0.540
20
WG479972
73-132
5.53
20
WG479972
51-142
3.44
20
WG479972
64-125
5.18
20
WG479972
63-142
2.27
20
WG479972
71-132
4.94
20
WG479972
56-145
7.19
20
WG479972
68-138
6.02
20
WG479972
70-135
5.80
20
WG479972
78-130
6.53
20
WG479972
72-134
5.75
20
WG479972
67-135
5.83
20
WG479972
72-122
2.16
20
WG479972
with QC Qualifiers.'

*ESC
1
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
L460296
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
May 26, 2010
Analyte
Units
Laboratory
Result
Control Sample Duplicate
Ref %Rec
Limit
RPD
Limit
Batch
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/l
0.0289
0.0279 116.
67-129
3.64
20
WG479972
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/l
0.0251
0.0244 100.
66-137
3.04
20
WG479972
Trichloroethene
mg/l
0.0274
0.0270 109.
74-126
1.24
20
WG479972
Trichlorofluoromethane
mg/l
0.0253
0.0246 101.
54-156
3.01
20
WG479972
vinyl chloride
mg/l
0.0258
0.0259 103.
55-153
0.560
20
WG479972
Xylenes, Total
mg/l
0.0839
0.0794 112.
75-128
5.61
20
WG479972
4-Bromofluorobenzene
107.4
75-128
WG479972
Dibromofluoromethane
103.8
79-125
WG479972
Toluene-d8
103.6
87-114
WG479972
Matrix Spike
Analyte _
Units
MS Res
Ref Res TV Rec
Limit
Ref Samp
Batch
Chloride mg/l 66.0 17.0 50 98.0 80-120 L459332-02 WG479684
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/1
2.61
0
.025
104.
45-152
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
mg/l
2.46
0
.025
98.6
31-161
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/1
2.51
0
.025
100.
49-149
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
mg/1
2.50
0
.025
100.
46-145
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
mg/l
2.92
0
.025
117.
14-168
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethane
mg/l
2.42
0
.025
96.8
30-159
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/l
2.53
0
.025
101.
10-162
L458976-01
WG479972
1,1-Dichloropropene
mg/l
2.46
0
.025
98.3
14-162
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.71
0.0169
.025
108.
32-143
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
mg/l
2.61
0
.025
104.
48-148
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
2.68
0.788
.025
75.7
36-141
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.79
0
.025
ill.
27-142
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
mg/1
4.30
3.90
.025
15.9-
29-153
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
mg/l
2.66
0
.025
106.
37-148
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2-Dibromoethane
mg/l
2.58
0
.025
103.
41-149
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.52
0
.025
101.
40-139
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2-Dichloroethane
mg/l
2.45
0
.025
98.1
29-167
L458976-01
WG479972
1,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
2.36
0.263
.025
84.1
39-148
L458976-01
WG479972
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
mg/l
2.82
0.480
.025
93.5
33-149
L458976-01
WG479972
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.54
0
.025
101.
32-148
L458976-01
WG479972
1,3-Dichloropropane
mg/l
2.44
0.0117
.025
97.0
44-142
L458976-01
WG479972
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.53
0.0111
.025
101.
32-136
L458976-01
WG479972
2,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
2.74
0
.025
109.
14-158
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Butanone (MEK)
mg/l
12.7
0
.125
102.
32-151
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
mg/l
12.3
0
.125
98.2
0-175
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
2.33
0
.025
93.3
35-147
L458976-01
WG479972
4-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
2.50
0.00286
.025
100.
33-147
L458976-01
WG479972
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
mg/l
13.7
0
.125
110.
40-160
L458976-01
WG479972
Acetone
mg/l
11.4
0.156
.125
90.0
25-157
L458976-01
WG479972
Acrolein
mg/l
2.87
0.382
.125
19.9
0-179
L458976-01
WG479972
Acrylonitrile
mg/1
13.4
0
.125
107.
37-162
L458976-01
WG479972
Benzene
mg/1
2.43
0
.025
97.2
16-158
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromobenzene
mg/l
2.44
0.0641
.025
95.1
37-147
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromodichloromethane
mg/l
2.36
0.0119
.025
94.1
45-147
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromoform
mg/l
2.38
0
.025
95.3
38-152
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromomethane
mg/l
2.70
0
.025
108.
0-191
L458976-01
WG479972
Carbon tetrachloride
mg/l
2.55
0.0684
.025
99.1
22-168
L458976-01
WG479972
Chlorobenzene
mg/l
2.53
0
.025
101.
33-148
L458976-01
WG479972
Chlorodibromomethane
mg/l
2.74
0
.025
109.
48-151
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloroethane
mg/l
1.81
0.00910
.025
72.2
4-176
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloroform
mg/l
2.54
0
.025
101.
37-147
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloromethane
mg/l
1.96
0.0212
.025
77.7
10-174
L458976-01
WG479972
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/l
2.61
0
.025
104.
29-156
L458976-01
WG479972
* Performance of this Analyte is
outside
of established criteria.
For additional information, please see
Attachment
A 'List of
Analytes
with QC
Qualifiers.'
Page 8 of 12

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
*ESC Fax [phone]
L•A•8 S•C•I•E•N-C•E•S
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366 Quality Assurance Report
Level II
Raleigh, NC 27636 May 26, 2010
L460296
Matrix Spike
Analyte Units MS Res Ref Res TV Rec Limit Ref Samp Batch
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/l 2.50 0 .025 100. 35-148 L458976-01 WG479972
Di -isopropyl ether mg/l 2.61 0 .025 104. 39-160 L458976-01 WG479972
Dibromomethane mg/1 2.65 0 .025 106. 36-152 L458976-01 WG479972
Dichlorodifluoromethane mg/l 2.48 0 .025 99.3 0-200 L458976-01 WG479972
Ethylbenzene mg/l 3.23 1.30 .025 77.1 29-150 L458976-01 WG479972
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene mg/l 2.47 0 .025 98.7 28-144 L458976-01 WG479972
Isopropylbenzene mg/l 2.88 0.190 .025 108. 35-147 L458976-01 WG479972
Methyl tert-butyl ether mg/l 2.66 0 .025 106. 24-167 L458976-01 WG479972
Methylene Chloride mg/l 2.48 0 .025 99.3 23-151 L458976-01 WG479972
n-Butylbenzene mg/l 2.62 0 .025 105. 22-151 L458976-01 WG479972
n-Propylbenzene mg/l 2.74 0.620 .025 84.7 26-150 L458976-01 WG479972
Naphthalene mg/l 2.79 0 .025 112. 24-160 L458976-01 WG479972
p-Isopropyltoluene mg/l 2.79 0 .025 112. 28-151 L458976-01 WG479972
sec-Butylbenzene mg/l 2.58 0 .025 103. 32-149 L458976-01 WG479972
Styrene mg/1 2.69 0.00893 .025 107. 38-149 L458976-01 WG479972
tert-Butylbenzene mg/1 2.67 0 .025 107. 36-149 L458976-01 WG479972
Tetrachloroethene mg/l 2.40 0 .025 95.8 13-157 L458976-01 WG479972
Toluene mg/l 2.49 0 .025 99.4 22-152 L458976-01 WG479972
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene mg/1 2.35 0 .025 94.1 11-160 L458976-01 WG479972
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/l 2.42 0.0124 .025 96.4 33-153 L458976-01 WG479972
Trichloroethene mg/l 2.39 0 .025 95.6 18-163 L458976-01 WG479972
Trichlorofluoromethane mg/1 2.17 0 .025 86.6 10-177 L458976-01 WG479972
vinyl chloride mg/l 2.10 0 .025 83.9 0-179 L458976-01 WG479972
Xylenes, Total mg/l 8.65 2.19 .075 86.2 27-151 L458976-01 WG479972
4-Bromofluorobenzene 104.3 75-128 WG479972
Dibromofluoromethane 104.4 79-125 WG479972
Toluene-d8 104.0 87-114 WG479972
Chromium mg/l 1.11 0 1.13 98.2 75-125 L460051-06 WG479657
Manganese mg/l 2.07 0.870 1.13 106. 75-125 L460051-06 WG479657
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Analyte Units MSD Ref %Rec Limit RPD Limit Ref Samp Batch
Chloride mg/l 65.4 66.0 96.8 80-120 0.913 20 L459332-02 WG479684
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/1 2.45 2.61 97.9 45-152 6.23 21 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/1 2.45 2.46 98.2 31-161 0.360 23 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/l 2.55 2.51 102. 49-149 1.36 22 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/l 2.54 2.50 101. 46-145 1.43 20 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane mg/l 2.89 2.92 116. 14-168 0.910 24 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethane mg/1 2.40 2.42 96.0 30-159 0.830 21 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1-Dichloroethene mg/1 2.59 2.53 103. 10-162 2.07 23 L458976-01 WG479972
1,1-Dichloropropene mg/1 2.40 2.46 96.1 14-162 2.21 23 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/l 2.61 2.71 104. 32-143 3.68 33 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/l 2.65 2.61 106. 48-148 1.41 23 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene mg/l 2.62 2.68 73.4 36-141 2.09 25 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/l 2.72 2.79 109. 27-142 2.46 30 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/l 4.39 4.30 19.7* 29-153 2.16 27 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane mg/l 2.74 2.66 110. 37-148 2.91 27 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2-Dibromoethane mg/l 2.66 2.58 106. 41-149 2.95 21 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/l 2.53 2.52 101. 40-139 0.380 23 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2-Dichloroethane mg/1 2.42 2.45 96.7 29-167 1.45 21 L458976-01 WG479972
1,2-Dichloropropane mg/1 2.28 2.36 80.9 39-148 3.44 20 L458976-01 WG479972
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/1 2.84 2.82 94.2 33-149 0.610 26 L458976-01 WG479972
1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/1 2.58 2.54 103. 32-148 1.61 24 L458976-01 WG479972
1,3-Dichloropropane mg/l 2.45 2.44 97.6 44-142 0.610 20 L458976-01 WG479972
* Performance of this Analyte is outside of established criteria.
For additional information, please see Attachment A 'List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers.,
Page 9 of 12

12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN
37122
*ESC
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
L•A•B S•C-I•E•N•C-E•S
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Quality
Assurance Report
Level II
Raleigh, NC 27636
May
26, 2010
L460296
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Analyte
Units
MSD
Ref
%Rec
Limit
RPD
Limit Ref Samp
Batch
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/l
2.53
2.53
101.
32-136
0.0300
23
L458976-01
WG479972
2,2-Dichloropropane
mg/l
2.68
2.74
107.
14-158
2.17
23
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Butanone (MEK)
mg/l
12.5
12.7
99.6
32-151
2.14
26
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
mg/l
11.6
12.3
92.9
0-175
5.60
75
L458976-01
WG479972
2-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
2.41
2.33
96.5
35-147
3.38
24
L458976-01
WG479972
4-Chlorotoluene
mg/l
2.52
2.50
101.
33-147
0.760
25
L458976-01
WG479972
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
mg/l
13.8
13.7
Ill.
40-160
1.09
28
L458976-01
WG479972
Acetone
mg/l
11.1
11.4
87.2
25-157
3.17
26
L458976-01
WG479972
Acrolein
mg/l
3.10
2.87
21.8
0-179
7.80
39
L458976-01
WG479972
Acrylonitrile
mg/1
13.2
13.4
106.
37-162
1.54
24
L458976-01
WG479972
Benzene
mg/l
2.39
2.43
95.8
16-158
1.48
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromobenzene
mg/1
2.51
2.44
97.7
37-147
2.61
23
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromodichloromethane
mg/l
2.31
2.36
92.1
45-147
2.16
20
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromoform
mg/1
2.36
2.38
94.6
38-152
0.760
20
L458976-01
WG479972
Bromomethane
mg/l
2.90
2.70
116.
0-191
7.23
35
L458976-01
WG479972
Carbon tetrachloride
mg/l
2.59
2.55
101.
22-168
1.81
24
L458976-01
WG479972
Chlorobenzene
mg/l
2.52
2.53
101.
33-148
0.630
22
L458976-01
WG479972
Chlorodibromomethane
mg/l
2.68
2.74
107.
48-151
2.08
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloroethane
mg/l
1.69
1.81
67.1
4-176
7.38
27
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloroform
mg/l
2.47
2.54
98.7
37-147
2.76
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Chloromethane
mg/l
1.93
1.96
76.4
10-174
1.66
28
L458976-01
WG479972
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/l
2.55
2.61
102.
29-156
2.28
22
L458976-01
WG479972
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/1
2.46
2.50
98.2
35-148
1.81
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Di -isopropyl ether
mg/l
2.55
2.61
102.
39-160
2.65
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Dibromomethane
mg/1
2.53
2.65
101.
36-152
4.97
20
L458976-01
WG479972
Dichlorodifluoromethane
mg/l
2.39
2.48
95.7
0-200
3.69
26
L458976-01
WG479972
Ethylbenzene
mg/1
3.28
3.23
79.0
29-150
1.49
24
L458976-01
WG479972
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
mg/1
2.27
2.47
90.8
28-144
8.28
33
L458976-01
WG479972
Isopropylbenzene
mg/l
2.90
2.88
108.
35-147
0.470
25
L458976-01
WG479972
Methyl tert-butyl ether
mg/l
2.58
2.66
103.
24-167
2.96
22
L458976-01
WG479972
Methylene Chloride
mg/l
2.43
2.48
97.0
23-151
2.35
21
L458976-01
WG479972
n-Butylbenzene
mg/l
2.56
2.62
102.
22-151
2.27
29
L458976-01
WG479972
n-Propylbenzene
mg/l
2.78
2.74
86.3
26-150
1.43
25
L458976-01
WG479972
Naphthalene
mg/l
2.80
2.79
112.
24-160
0.260
37
L458976-01
WG479972
p-Isopropyltoluene
mg/l
2.81
2.79
112.
28-151
0.900
27
L458976-01
WG479972
sec-Butylbenzene
mg/l
2.58
2.58
103.
32-149
0.130
26
L458976-01
WG479972
Styrene
mg/l
2.70
2.69
107.
38-149
0.0800
23
L458976-01
WG479972
tert-Butylbenzene
mg/l
2.66
2.67
106.
36-149
0.310
26
L458976-01
WG479972
Tetrachloroethene
mg/l
2.51
2.40
100.
13-157
4.61
24
L458976-01
WG479972
Toluene
mg/l
2.47
2.49
98.6
22-152
0.810
22
L458976-01
WG479972
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/l
2.49
2.35
99.5
11-160
5.56
23
L458976-01
WG479972
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/l
2.39
2.42
94.9
33-153
1.51
22
L458976-01
WG479972
Trichloroethene
mg/l
2.40
2.39
96.1
18-163
0.580
21
L458976-01
WG479972
Trichlorofluoromethane
mg/l
2.06
2.17
82.2
10-177
5.16
24
L458976-01
WG479972
Vinyl chloride
mg/l
2.08
2.10
83.1
0-179
0.940
26
L458976-01
WG479972
Xylenes, Total
mg/l
8.93
8.65
89.9
27-151
3.13
23
L458976-01
WG479972
4-Bromofluorobenzene
106.6
75-128
WG479972
Dibromofluoromethane
104.0
79-125
WG479972
Toluene-d8
103.8
87-114
WG479972
Chromium
mg/l
1.11
1.11
98.2
75-125
0
20
L460051-06
WG479657
Manganese
mg/1
2.04
2.07
104.
75-125
1.46
20
L460051-06
WG479657
Batch number /Run number / Sample
number cross reference
WG479684: R1231309: L460296-01
WG479972: R1232368: L460296-01
* Performance of this Analyte
is outside
of established
criteria.
For additional information,
please see
Attachment A 'List
of Analytes
with QC
Qualifiers.'
Page 10 of 12

OESC
I
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
WG479657: R1234070: L460296-01
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
L460296
* * Calculations are performed prior to rounding of reported values
* Performance of this Analyte is outside of established criteria.
For additional information, please see Attachment A 'List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers.'
Page 11 of 12
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
May 26, 2010

� I
OESC
L•A•B 6•C•1•E•N•C•E•5
Duncklee and Dunham
Bryson Trexler
PO Box 33366
Raleigh, NC 27636
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
[phone]
1-800-767-5859
Fax [phone]
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
L460296
The data package includes a summary of the analytic results of the quality
control samples required by the SW-846 or CWA methods. The quality control
` f samples include a method blank, a laboratory control sample, and the matrix
spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis. If a target parameter is outside
the method limits, every sample that is effected is flagged with the
appropriate qualifier in Appendix B of the analytic report.
Method Blank - an aliquot of reagent water carried through the
entire analytic process. The method blank results indicate if
any possible contamination exposure during the sample handling,
digestion or extraction process, and analysis. Concentrations of
target analytes above the reporting limit in the method blank are
qualified with the "B" qualifier.
Laboratory Control Sample - is a sample of known concentration
that is carried through the digestion/extraction and analysis
process. The percent recovery, expressed as a percentage of the
theoretical concentration, has statistical control limits
indicating that the analytic process is "in control". If a
target analyte is outside the control limits for the laboratory
control sample or any other control sample, the parameter is
flagged with a 11J411 qualifier for all effected samples.
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate - is two aliquots of an
environmental sample that is spiked with known concentrations of
target analytes. The percent recovery of the target analytes
also has statistical control limits. If any recoveries that are
outside the method control limits, the sample that was selected
for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis is flagged with
either a 11J5° or a 11J611. The relative percent difference (%RPD)
between the matrix spike and the matrix spike duplicate
recoveries is all calculated. If the RPD is above the method
limit, the effected samples are flagged with a "J311 qualifier.
Page 12 of 12
May 26, 2010

Company Name/Address
Altemate Billing
Analysis/Container/Preservative
Chain of Custody
Page_Loft
Duncklee & Dunham
A068
511 Keisler Dr.
Prepared by:
Cary, North Carolina 27511
*ESC
L.-A•0 8•C-1•E.W C•E•3
12065 Lebanon Road
Report to:
Son ^CVRXLe'r
E-mail to r
�
m,
Mt. Juliet TN 37122
Project Description: Kayser -Roth
Cay/State Asheboro, NC
Phone [phone]
Phone [phone]
PHONE: [phone]
Client Project No. 02600
Lab Project #
E
FAX: [phone]
E
�
L
V
c
Collected by: �ti 'w-�
ftTZ FI 101 t[.1 U.W1
Site/Facility ID#
t�1
P.O.#
CoCode (lab use only)
Collected by(signature):
Rush? (Lab MUST be Notified)
Date Results Needed
No
_
Same Day ....... 200%
D v�d�
N
N
Template/Prelogin
Next Day ........ 100%
Email? es
—
of
c
to
77
o0
X
Packed on Ice N Y_V/
Two Day ......... 50%
FAX? No —Yes
C
M
2
o
t
0
U
0
>
Shipped Via -.Raleigh Service Center
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix
Depth
Date
Time
Cntrs
Remarks/contaminant
Sample # (lab only)
40 LA) k2- 0 5 1
CF,w
512-io
9
L LI 462 -d t
Matrix. SS-Soil/Solid Groundwater WW-Wastewater DW-Drinking Water OT- Other %
Remarks:
pH Temp
Flow Other
Relin 'sher by:(Sgnature
Date:
Time:
Re y:(Sgnature)
Samples returned via: FedEx_ UPS O er
Condition (lab use only)
5- p-lo
,...
in fisher b Si n ture
Y ( 9
Date:
Time:
Received : (Sgnature)
Temp: p
Bottles Received:
3I y
1f,
Relinquisher by:(Signature
Date:
Time:
Received for lab b na re
Date:
Time:
pH Checked: NCF:
5� - 0
07zo
`<�

DUNCKLEE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
511 KEISLER DRIVE - SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
OFFICE: (9191 858 - 9898
FACSIMILE: (919) 858 -- 9899
DATE: 13
4/U
JOB NO.
PROJECT
1 0
Q
NAME: 1 \
—
LOCATION:
PRESENT
AT SITE:
WEATHER:
TEMPERATURE
r
'7J
C/
C
&TIME:.
WD QO
ARRIVAL
A,
DEPARTURE
TIME �'
PM
TIME
3 P
D..._.___15....._..._.�a \
1 or o 01:Fi(: F BOx 33 3fiG - R,Ii,n(111, NUR i H C`:ltt<,t.t�:� 2i63fi

3INo/[RON*IENT&LCONSULTANTS
n/KosuaDRIVE - SUITE /m
| CAxv,NORTH CxxoLmx7rsm
/ onIce Mo`"-o-"vv
/ FxcomuE: /919,858-9899
DATE:
JOB NO.
PROJEO'
q
NAME:
" c.--
LOCA"I'lONI(Y171
PRESENT
WEATHER,
TEMPEANWRE
ARRIVAL
DEPARTURE
9j
:
—��-------�-------------------- ( `
�
-_---o��—��
'
//
COPIES TO--- FIELD REPORT
. . ~'~^'__ 00,,44=G�2c: -- —
�)/Un:n:|�zx33�o0 -�mnu/.�^x�n��mx/���?6�w
'

DUNCKLEE
r & DUNHAM
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
511 KEISLER DRIVE - SUITE 102
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
OFFICE: (919) 858 - 9898
FACSIMILE: (919) 858 - 9899
DATE:
JOEI NO.
//
b � O
PROJECT '1
NAME: y - vWw"
LOCATION:
PRESENT I -In`
AT SITE: WIFE J {-
WEATIIER:
�, 411r1L.
TEMPERATURE J
& TIME.
ARRIVAL
TIME
�jc1
A
PM
DEPARTURE AM
TIME 1 7 3S 'M
D. __...........
_........_.. __.---_
of
__.___.._._..._...._..___..... ._...._.__
........�nE__.-..._ .-..... .
_.o_.... ... ... ........... ...
L✓ -
D._ ....__..
0• l
...._...._..... . _...._. _.....-__..
........_..___..
_... _rrtiw_-3-------
--._....__ ._..___.
% l J..-.�� '.._.
_...._....... .�..I.......................I
COPIES TO� IELD REPORT
Page or SIGNED
li:\I 7(1.4
i

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
511 KEISLER DRIVE -- SUITE 102
CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27318
OFFICE; (91_9) &SS -- 9898
FACSIMILE: (919) 358- 9899
DATE
/10V
JOB NO. /�o� p�
6
PROJECT
V
O V
NAME: L a _
LOCATIO ':
PRESENT
(� r-
►l�' JCTC !v
AT SITE:
WEATHER:-
TEMPI RXrURE /
&TIMF: (3 �- o
ARRIVAL,
DEPARTURE A Ms
T]ME
�r
O3� PM
TIME © PM

DUNCKLC
& DUNHA
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo ID: tA
f
Sample ID — t — 0�
Client: Kayser Raoth Facility Date: 4 - - 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Star jayo am/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish JJJg2— am/pm
Weather Conditions: Collectors Ja son Kilgoyne, Matt Flinchum
WATER LEVEL DATA: measured from MP at To of Cast Well Piezometer El( p,9)
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) �1 dll c. Casing Material PVC e. Lengt of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) r. l d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617m1/ft and 4"=2470mifft
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Melhod,'Equipment cJ
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (Ilmin) C U Q
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #.
Elk
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes
9
No
❑
N/A
❑
Has required volume been removed
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
❑
a,
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
P?r,
❑❑,��.�1tA�
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.lft/min
❑
3ttC
NO3 = _
If no or N,A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Aaln•
C1 rf,_
Sample ID
Container Type
No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
Flo m'l tic S
Ack
6a5
�a i s{-iLl
iIF
b vni
1AoNk
CIA(Olt i dk
comments:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature Date 4 - 10
i
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
En*mrnental Cor"gams
511 Keisw Dr, sure 102 Phone [phone]
Cary, Nodh Calolxla 27518 Fax: [phone]

DUNCKL
& DUNHAM
Grouted Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo ID: Aiw — `'v t
Sample ID —
Client: Kayser Raoth Fatuity Date: 4 - - 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start _L5 Z!,am/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish JfIr 5— am/pm
Weather Conditions: Collectors Ja on Kilco ne Man Flinchum
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing Well Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth.(ft bmp)• c. Casing Material PVC e: Lent of Water Col. (a-b)
� [ .� J
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) � d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol,
2=617mllft and 4"=2470mVft
WELL PURGING DATA (1
a. Purge Method/Equipment ' Aou,3 4tcy Y`flCLiA�.�
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge -Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (Umin) /V o�Cvi•
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs .
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testino Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #,
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed
Yes"
M
No
❑
V
N/A
❑ Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
❑/
❑ Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
❑
❑ Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft/min
❑
Sk NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
[L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
COJ - 10Yj - DIAN
a m 1 Wass
i
' ob
i Os
v
i
Lti;
aso 1
i
comments:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling 1
Signature �+ Date 4 -ill - 10
Dunaklee Dunham, P.C.
-Environmental Consultants
511 Keisler Dr, Suite 102 Phone 919,858 989a
Fax• 919.858.9899
Cory, North Carolina 2?518

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
i
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Raoth Facility
Project No: 02600
Site Location: Ashboro. NC
Weather Conditions: (col e- L., , u
Well/Piezo ID: IKW _ GQ Sam le ID W — g—O 17
Date: 4 - 10
Time: Start am/pm
Finish Q' am/pm
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing) Well EX Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) C_ c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Col, (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth r p (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617ml/ft and 4"=2470m1/ft
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment lee
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (1/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters aka
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Pace #
i ..
L�1R�19�sii+��>s
NMI
Fo GEW.
�A�_—_
rli�il•_--IM
IM.
i I
ttilL7NE
M.
c
A"�
—
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Ye
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
I�
❑ /
❑
Dissolved COZ =
Has required turbidity been reached
�/
[11�
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
L
❑
❑
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1 ft/min
❑
❑
NO3 =
- If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
6LJl.0
L40 1 5
4CI
! b
t+
J m 'Ntf
i
+
IOW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature ,L / Date 4 -14 - 10
l
Dunchloo Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 KelslerDr, Suite tat
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Phono 019.868,0898
Pax, 919.858.9899

DUNCKLE
& DUNHAMi
Ground dater -Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo ID:(i1/� 3
Sample ID
i
Client:' Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 - - 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start II q Ln., am/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish MS1 am/pm
Weather Conditions: Gl t-,00 Co9lectorfsl Jayson Kilcovne. Matt Flinchum
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing WeIth
Piezometer Ela. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) c. Casing Material PVC e. ofWater Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d.. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment [ a1N �� S t��►�t
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan) /J r V ��1
- Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (Umti in) v
- Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs .
- Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
A Fialrl Tashnn Fnuinmpnt rnlihratinn Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
VIM,
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
-Has required volume been removed
Yew
No
❑
N/A
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
Have parameters stabilized
,h1i
emu,/
❑
C]
❑
El
Sulfide = __
Fe*2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1f /min
Q'
L
NO3 =
If no or NIA -Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: .Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
0,410
qoml Clika:i
14C 1
06C ` cv ab
I
i
i
comments :
IDW: Place in drum r note other method of handling ,,ii
Signature 124 ? Date 4 - NA 10
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 Keisler Dr. Suite 102- Phone [phone]
Cary. North Carolina 27518 Fax. 919.858,9899

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo ID: _i
Sam le ID QW— I L-L 0
Client: Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 - i Li -10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start MQ amlpm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish am/pm
Weather Conditions: t V2:f T /� coot(— Collectors JaysoiKRcQYnq—lAW Fllinch-um
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing) Well k1iPiezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp)_ c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) b.4 J d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
WELL PURGING DATA [T L. a. Purge Method/Equipmentyn C lhl Lei 'F� t51ti)
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min) 4 �,I��S
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs ; J
Stabilization of -Parameters %
I ,
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
1 0 -Y,
to . r n.
�
Ktil"MEM=M=M1=-
M MMUMM—
RN
-
n... IIMMM9
y
MINIM
In
I
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Y
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
F
❑
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
Q�
❑
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
❑
❑
_
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.11`11min
&I,
❑�
NO3 =
If no or NIA - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Method: QSO,Ij
ta�m-
comments :
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling 1 i
Signature r r �� Date
w r,
Dunddee WnMm, P.C.
EnvimnmerU CansuRsnes
511 KeWs Or, Sade-t02 Phone [phone]
Cafy, Nonh Carolina 275t8 Fax; 919.d58.9899

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo ID:
Sam le ID - ' 6, ••ILA J 1
Client: Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 0 - 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start_ am/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish 11"I am/pm
Weather Conditions: &,�A r�`�t � Collectors Ja son Kiico ne Mat Flinc um
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing) Well 10, Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) �l �t c. Casing Material PVC. e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table:Depth (ft bmp)Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol._
WELL PURGING DATA
a: Purge Method/Equipment
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
A PWA T—finn FrnrinmPnt Calihratinn l7inctlmentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
=MR
MIN
q6m��l
MEMO
_
ffW
-
IN
" � r
M_ffrrn
WIRM-
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed9�1
Yes
No
❑❑
N/A
El Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
E;K
❑
Sulfide =
❑
Have parameters stabilized
J
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft/min
❑
❑
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Method:
Y�
Sample ID
Container Type
y No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
Ito
MI rmass
comments:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature % s.✓ Date 4 - - 10
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 Xeisler or, Suite 102
Cary, Will,
Carolina 27518
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]

DUNCKLE-
i
& DUNHA
Well/PiezoID:
Sam le ID — 104
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
it: Kayser Roth Facility
act No: 02600
Location: Ash_boro, NC
ether Conditions: I^ .-n 1 1-1 ti. J
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casin )
i
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) c. Casing Material PVC
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2"
Date: 4 - - 1,0/
Time: Start (('L?5 amlpm
Finish 4_ am/pm
Well C61 Piezomeler ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol.
a. Purge Method/Equipment Gykit / �-,vo nQloj
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan) T
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (1/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Paae #
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes/
No
NIA
Has required volume been removed
L�,'//
❑
❑
Dissolved CO2
Has required turbidity been reached
❑
El
Sulfide
Have parameters stabilized
�lyd'
tom'
❑
❑
10M
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >O.IfUmin
❑
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
`M
INK
T�Z
l
li V 111111C1 111 .
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature Date 4 -q - 10
Danchlee Duamam, P.C,
Environmental conswams
- 511 KeWtr Dr. Sate IQ Phone 919,858 9898
Cary, Hong Calalww 27818 Fax! 919,858.9899

DUNCI .LE WeluPiezo lD: )qtV _(
& DUNHAM ISamplell) fi4W — (— 0%41r!
Ground Water Sample Collection record
Client: Kayser Roth.Facility. Date: 4 - -10
Project No: 02600 Time: St-rt Ag1ram/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish JOICo am/pm
Weather Conditions: `ZAbkQ/ Collecto s 9a n KilMme, Matt Flinchum
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) c. Casing Material PVC
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2"
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment T�Sni f S 6Qfc.. �4tsl
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (Q well volumes) or rate (I/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model
rt Fielri Testinn Fnuioment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook #
Well Piezometer ❑
e. Le �gth of Water Cot. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol.
i.15-
JAl16',5
Page #.
Serial Number
��1LL11
i�����
e •
• .. ..
•
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes/
No
N/A
❑
Has required volume been removed
❑
Dissolved CO2
Has required turbidity been reached
Have stabilized
❑
El
❑ Sulfide =
❑ Fe+2=
parameters
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft/min
❑
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: -
0
Sample ID
Container Type
Y No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
uommenis.:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signaturer Date 4 -1h - 10
sc
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants _
511 Keister Dr, Suite 102 Phone [phone]
Fax: 919.658.989?
Cary, North Carolina 27518 . i

DUNCKLE
ii & DUNW
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
WelllPiezoID: MV—i
Sam le ID, it " 64 4 D,
Client: Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 - 114 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start JD_Q�'amlpm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish _-� 0 7A4- am/pm
Weather Conditions: (y` �9.['�a$ �Ci` Collectors Ja son Kilco ne Matt F__li_nchum
2/
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing) Well Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) �I c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
WELL PURGING DATA ni
a. Purge Method/EquipmentCk
I
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min)i""A� niC�
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
e. Acceptance criteria passifail
YeV
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
❑
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
E21*,
❑
❑
Sulfide =
Have -parameters stabilized
GK
❑
❑/
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft/min
❑
❑
NO3 =
If no or NIA - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: bWTwo
Rain,
Sample ID
Container Type
No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
1..i 1- 041 b
4C;Mi Ak Ss
FVL1
VOC."
uommenis :
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature �J� Date 4 -14 - 10
if
Dunckleo Dunham, P.C.
Envitonmemal Consultants
sit Keisler Dr, Suite 102 Phone [phone]
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Farr 9i9.858.9893

Project No:
Site Location:
Weather Conditions:
DUNC➢CL1E
& DUNHAjIM
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Kayser Roth Facility
02600
Ashboro. NC
Well/Piezo ID:
Sam le ID
Date: 4 - - 10
Time: Start M/5— am/pm
Finish CQ31 am/pm
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of casing) well cj� Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) q— c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Cot. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617mi/ft and 4"=2470mi/ft
WELL PURGIN_ G DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
- Purge Volume (Q well volumes) or rate (I/min) ry 2 •� �N �r U�y
- Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs J
- Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
rl Fi=lri Toctinn FnuinmQnt r.nhhratinn Documentation Found in Field Notebook #
Page #
f A
®=
KIMEMMMOM9M
®C
■�
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed
Yes
ff1,
No
NIA
O Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
40
Sulfide =
Have, parameters stabilized
21
❑❑,,p�I
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft/min
❑'
Elnv_
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
w No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
--
440 rk I VoA
3
�v
comments:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature Date 4 -11 - 10.
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 Kelsler. Dr, Suite 102 - Phone [phone]
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Fax [phone]

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Roth Facility
Project No: 02600
Site Location: Ashboro, NC
Weather Conditions: T!%O Collector(s) Jay. on Kilcovne.
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) ;�(�! c. Casing Material PVC
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp), f d. Casing Diameter 2"
Well/Piezo ID:
Sam le ID -
Dater 4 - 3 - 10
Time: Stag r Q am/pm
Finish 13!1 L am/pm
Well 20 Piezometer ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol.
VytLL YUKUING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment 128 -- ncA. V A n / ��� --1
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from wo plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Ye
No
NIA
Has required volume been removed
❑
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
�
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
IT-
❑❑�A
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.Ift/min
'-�,�,
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
�
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: -
Liz 0-3
00
Ra.w•
Container Type
No. of Containers-
r
u
'.
comments:
IDW: Place In drum or note other method of handling
1 IIsl�1 Signature Date 4 - ) . 2
, 10
Duncklee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 Keisler Dr, Suito 102 Phone [phone]
Cary, Nodh Carolina 27518 Fail: 919.8%9899

DUNCKLE
& DUNHAIVI
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Roth,Facility -
Project No: 02600
Site Location: Ashboro, NC
Weather Conditions: it Collectors) Jayson Kilgovne
%t}S
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Depth_(ft bmp) =� c. Casing Material PVC
b.- Water Table Depth (ft bmp) /- 5, d. Casing Diameter 2'
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment I XLIL -
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (1/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs .
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook #
Well/Piezo ID:
Sample ID r — E-IL
Date: 4 - - 10
Time: Start J 6a0am/pm
! Finish 1630 am/pm
Well Piezometer ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617ml/ft and 4"=2470m1/ft
Page #.
Serial Number
••
�
VFTNN�
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Ye
No.
N/A
Has required volume been removed
,,.6G.
❑
❑
Dissolved COZ =
Has required turbidity been reached
Have parameters stabilized//
❑
El
Sulfide =
Fe*2=
Has low flow been maintained at->0.1ft/min
Wit.
❑
r❑'
r' S.1r •
NO3 =
If no or NIA - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
10TO
q0 ilyk VoA3LIM
i
�o
t
--
uommems.:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method
of handling
Signature s i Date 4 - 6 10
Duncklee Dunham, P.C-
Environmental Consultants
511 Keisleror, Suite 102 Phone [phone]
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Fax: [phone]

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Roth Facility
Project No: 02600
Site Location: Ashboro, NC
Weather Conditions: A/Idrvy-t _e Collector(s) JaysonKilcovne
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) ui,i5 i c. Casing Material PVC
p (ft bmp) L+ ' d.:Casing Diameter_2"
b. Water Table Depth
VVQLL rVr[\arrvu uNiN
a. Purge Method/Equipment t7� (L1n1 Jl��t`Z
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min}
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model
Well/Piezo ID: v r 3
Sam le ID '—I 3 — og, 10
Date: 4 - - 10
Time: Start r-5-10 am/pm
Finish am/pm
Well 9 Piezometer ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol. _
2"=617mllft and 4"=2470m1/ft
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
Serial Number
_--■-K
M,�
men M_--■-
M#
OWN
--■-
MRN�
• r
���
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Ye
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
❑—/
❑ Dissolved CO2
Has required turbidity been reached
Have parameters stabilized
❑
F9
❑
❑ Sulfide =
❑���yr Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1f imin
El'�'
' v. NO3 =
If no or NIA - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
X-LIrw
Sample ID
Container Type
. No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
13
q O
3
ild
&4n
M I a( t,
'0
G
�Vrruno.ns . -
- IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature Date 4 - 7- 10
II
L
Duncklee Dunham. P.C,
Environmental Consultants -
511 Kaislor De, Suite 102 ' Phone [phone]
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Fax: [phone]

DUNCKLE
WelitPiezo ID:
& DUNHA4
Sam le inAw—
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Roth Facility
Date: 4 - 10
i,
Project No: 02600
Time: Start 1340 am/pm
Site Location: - Ashboro, NC
Finish i )% am/pm
Weather Conditions: Cv, to
Collectors
Ja son Kilco ne -Half Flinchum
���LLL
, I
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from_ MP at Top of Casing)
Well Piezometer El
a. Total Well -Depth (ft bmp)
c: Casing Material
PVC e. L gth of Water Cal. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) rO-�
d. Casing Diameter
2" f. Calculated Well Vol:
2"=617ml/ft and 4"=2470mVft
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method/Equipment L7�t/1
�uLt'l�l
fie_. t%Lt.ti�n.� -
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate
(Umin)
1T4tt0
Maximum Allowable Turbidity
NTUs .
Stabilization of Parameters
%
c. Field Testing Equipment Used:
Make
Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook Page #
r �
������irl4�L1���-�"•1%diG�lA:u
�
�'��fft���
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Ye
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
El
C
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
01
El
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
.17
.04"
Fe+2-
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1fVmin
L7
O
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample ID
Container Type
No, of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
1.1
L.ommenis :
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling Signature • Date 4 - 13 10
Dunddee Dunham, P.C.
Environmental Consultants _
511 Keisler or, Suite 102 Phone [phone]
Cary, North Carolina 27518 Fax: 919,858.9899 i

L_
DUNCKLE Well/Piezo ID:
&DUNHAM Sample ID _ 0
Ground. Water Sample Collection Record
Client: Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 - I - 10
Project No: 02600 Time: Start I-Z-5 am/pm
Site Location: Ashboro, NC Finish ilsu am/pm
Weather Conditions: � QiLT i��'1L/ 1+0 Jr --K O Collectors Ja son Kilco ne Matt Flinchum
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing) Well [L� Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp)q, c. Casing Material PVC e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617m1/ft and 4"=2470mi/ft
WVtLL PUKUINU UAIA Huy
a. Purge Method/Equipment m Ju y V1('Q ne
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min) Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs A*X-a 5 c �',� �-j-5,e
Stabilization of Parameters % C7 i VV
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
I�_��C'�t�f■�7L71�=IiG�►.�
�. 1 •
r651�
r
.. 1
low-_--
i
I ,
' I-®ME,J.
a
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
Be-
El
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached/
❑
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
L'7�A�
❑
❑
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1f lmin
rss ^yam
❑ -
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
�7
commems:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of hardtling
9
- Signature ar i Date 4-13: 10
ounck*e Dunham. P.C. - - -
EnvmnxverW Consuta7s
511 KeWer Dr, Suss 182 _ Phare 919:858.9898
Cary, Pdonh C&IOMM 27648 Fax:-919,858.9899

DUNC➢{LE
& KV !H
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
WelYPiezo 1D:
Sam 3e IDiqGV—Z-j tKe%O
d; Kayser Roth Facility Date: 4 - - 10
act No: 02600 Time: Start j�s am/pm
Location:. Ashboro, NC Finish 2- 5 am/pm
they Conditions: tvif Vliaft71 Collectorls) Jayson KiIgAo ne, Matt F6nc11um
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casino . Well Piezometer ❑
a. Total Well Depth (ft bmp) 'W c: Casing Material PVC e. tengt of Water Col. (a-b)
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) �Ltrl d: Casing Diameter 2" f. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617mUft and 4"=2470ml/ft
WFLL PURGING DATA l _ . 8/ I n It It
a. Purge Method/Equipment JUVV -t LEAMM
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan)
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (Ilmin) rt / f� r /} j tCc
- Maximum Allowable TurbidityNTUs � J(
- Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
ri Plain Tpatinn Pnilinment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook# Page #.
MRS
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Y
No
❑
N/A
❑
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required volume been removed
Has required turbidity been reached
❑
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
❑
❑qeR'
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1111min
❑
Sk
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
at.Z
L 0,0
Sample ID
Container Type
-No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
r Zl-s = t p
y,.t
.. 3
23y—
,© y{1
comments :
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
i
Signature Date— 4-N. - 10
Duncklee Dunham. P.C. _
Environmental Consultants
511- Keisler or, Suite 102 Phone [phone]
Cary. North Carolina 27518 Fax: 9,9.658.9599

Client:
Project No:
Site Location:
Weather Conditions:
DUNCKLE
& DUNIiA
Ground Water Sample Collection. Record
Kayser Roth Facility
02600
ATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casin
Total Well Depth (ft bmp)c. Casing Material PVC
Water Table Depth (ft bmp) T(t J d. Casing Diameter 2"
WelUPiezo ID: n �,
Sam le ID
Date: 4 - 10
Time: Start if Za am/pm
Finish 111141t am/pm
Well Piezometer ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
f. Calculated Well Vol.
WELL PURGING DATA /
a. Purge Method/Equipment n1 (
,�� ��1 0-1/ W MI1,
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan) IT l
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs J J
Stabilization of Parameters %
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial.Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yet
No
N/A
Has required volume been removed
M
❑
❑
Dissolved COj
Has required turbidity been reached
0
❑
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
❑
❑
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >0.1ft1min
❑
NO3 =
If no or NIA • Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
p i
Pat- :
.
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
LLO
3
U0 b
1
comments:
IDW: Place In drum or note other method of handling
Signature Date 4 • �- 70
C�/l r ' (T
Dunck" Dunham, P.C.
_ EA1.1mmemal consultants - -
511 KMIer Dr, Suiht 102 - Phone [phone]
CWY, Ncnh Catoltna 27518 - Fax: [phone]

DUNCKLEE
& DUNHAM
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
511 KEISLER DRIVE - SUITE 102
CARP. NORTH CAROLINA 27518
OFFICE: (919) 858 - 9898
FACSIMILE: (919) 858 - 9899
DATE:
JOf3 NO.
PROJECT
(D vc)
NAME:
i
bovylYJum
LOCATION:
PRESENT
{�}� G
AT SITE:
w r i tM l F
WEATHER: f` doluc�
�++
TEMPERATURE
& TIME:
CCYY
ARRIVAL A
DEPARTURE
A
TIME 1015PM
TIME
c'M
....... _ 1eq_t_ .. (' mod_. ___._ __........
..__F.,...._.._._....r.."_.-
- _ __._kiti-,. ._.._..l.l.
lie
. • •.f
COPIES TO FIELD REPORT
Page j taf SIGNED
kl'.ijjNtt;Aim)RLSs Puss Oi-inwi 3ox.33,36i a Fi'aLl:liill,Nilit'1'IiC:�Rt)1.1`m;127636

DUNCKLE
& DUNHA
Client:
Project No:
Site Location:
Weather Conditions:
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
Collector(s)
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from MP at Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Depth.(ft bmp) c. Casing Material PVl.
b. Water Table Depth (ft bmp) d. Casing Diameter ,a {t
PURGING DATA
Well/Piezo ID: rn W _ YJ
Sam le ID 'V W
I
Date: &Zjo' )a
Time: Start 1154 am/pm
Finish la am/pm
Well 521 Piezometer ❑
e. Length of Water Col. (a-b)
J. Calculated Well Vol.
2"=617m1/ft and 4"=24i
a. Purge Method/Equipment 75C `t SI:t1pVa1 1i I D1RPumnlapi J V—) 1101,4J
b. Acceptance Criteria Defined (from work plan) `= f
Purge Volume (@ well volumes) or rate (I/min)
Maximum Allowable Turbidity NTUs re�C1 f (�
Stabilization of Parameters % 'J
c. Field Testing Equipment Used: Make Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation Found in Field Notebook # Page #
_--lr
t !
��
r ♦
f►�li�Jr,I�F►�titR!C�'r
' . '
WWI
���_�
r ♦
i�1rC>•�_
WIF MIN
e. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes
No
O❑
N/A
Has required volume been removed
O
o-'
Dissolved CO2 =
Has required turbidity been reached
Sulfide =
Have parameters stabilized
M-1
❑
❑
Fe+2=
Has low flow been maintained at >O.1ft/min
❑
0"
NO3 =
If no or N/A - Explain below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
Sample 1D
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
Comments:
IDW: Place in drum or note other method of handling
Signature Ft.a Date
I
Dunckiee Duntumn. P.C.
Environmental Consultants
511 Keisler Dr. Suite 102 Phone [phone] -
Cary. North Carolina 27518 Fax: [phone] i

1800
1600
1400
1200
.a
0
c
1000
0
U
a
600
400
200
0
7/24/98
MW-3
12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
—0-- Mn —*— PCE -04�9-24-07 Injection "E-3-17-05 Injection—00-7-14-03 Injection
2000
1800
1600
1400
t
1200 c
0
0
w
1000 yam,
a.+
C
v
V
fl
800 U
w
U
a
600
400
200
0
11/18/10

MW-6b
12000
10000
8000
bA
a
c
c
0
6000
L
U
4000
2000
0
7/24/98 12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
fMn �PCE -00-9-24-07Injection-}3-17-05Injection Om*'7-14-03Injection
10
9
8
7
2
0
11/18/10
-J

14000
12000
10000
on
0
° 8000
Qo
0
c�
L
C
6000
0
4000
2000
0
7/24/98
12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
—S— Mn —*--July 14 03 Injection 4 PCE — —March 17 05 Injection-F-9-24-07 Injection
700
600
500
n
k
200
100
0
11/18/10

800000
700000
600000
t500000
Q
.S
Q
0
e 400000
C.)300000
a
200000
100000
0
7/24/98
MW-10b
12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
--M--Mn --*—PCE om$�9-24-07Injection f3-17-05Injection ` 0-7-14-03Injection
10,000
8,000
t
6,000 a
Q
0
4,000 U
2,000
0
11/18/10

40000
36000
32000
28000
a
ate,
c 24000
c
c
0
a 20000
L
c
6J
V
0 16000
U
c
12000
8000
4000
0
12/6/99
MW-17
4/19/01 9/l/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
—0— Mn PCE t9-24-07 Injection t3-17-05 Injection —0-7-14-03 Injection
14,000
12,000
10,000
a
0
8,000 E
0
Q
6,000 0
0
U
W
U
a
4,000
2,000
0
11/18/10

10000
9000
8000
7000
a
boo
a 6000
C
C
O
R 5000
L
1.+
O
U
U
0 4000
LIM
a
3000
2000
1000
0
7/24/98
12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
-f-Mn —4-7-14-03Injection —4-PCE—0-9-24-07Injection f13-17-05Injection
1000
900
800
700
W
00
600
O
i
500 i
C
v
u
C
400 C)
W
U
300
200
100
0
11/18/10

30000
27000
24000
21000
t
O 18000
a
a
O
15000
O
u
U 12000
a
i
9000
6000
3000
0
7/24/98
DW-2
12/6/99 4/19/01 9/1/02 1/14/04 5/28/05 10/10/06 2/22/08 7/6/09
Time in Years
fMn -f—PCE t9-24-07Injection f3-17-05Injection t7-14-03Injection
1000
900
800
700
P
600 .9
a
O
500 C
a
u
a
400 t j
W
U
300 a
200
100
0
11/18/10