WQ0003351_Staff Report_20201105

DocuSign Envelope ID: EOBDB84C-6F40-449E-94E7-81C6F889378E
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
November 4, 2020
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Erick Saunders
Application No.: W00003351
Facility name: Town of Mocksville RLAP
From: Patrick Mitchell
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? n Yes or ® No
a. Date of most recent site visit: October 7, 2020
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Henderson
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
e. Driving directions: See file.
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? n Yes n No ® NE
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NE
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or n No
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? n Yes ❑ No ® NE
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes n No ® NE
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or n No
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues n Current enforcement action(s) n Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation n Currently under SOC n Currently under moratorium
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
nYes ®NonN/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: EOBDB84C-6F40-449E-94E7-81C6F889378E
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
o uSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparer: Mr& Akiktu ,(, ,-DocuSianed bv:
Signature of regional supery
Date: November 4, 2020
5548B6CO265C47A...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
�145B49E225C94EA...
The only modification requested is an increase in annual dry tonnage. The currently permitted land application acreage
is sufficient to support the proposed increase. Analytical data provided on the source facility appears to meet regulatory
limits. Recommend issuing permit modification with increased annual tons in the Attachment A.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2